AsTable discussed in Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, all of the note holders have agreed to extend the due dates from October 15 and 31, 2013 to October 15, 2014, while two of the note holders have provided the Company with new loans for a total of $200,000 that are due January 31, 2014 with interest at an annual rate of 18%. The note holders also expect the Company will raise an additional $200,000 from other investors in January 2014. The note holders of the additional $200,000 loans will extend the due dates for these new loans to October 15, 2014 if the Company closes the new $200,000 debt financing by January 31, 2014 and agrees to a prepayment schedule based the Company’s cash flow. Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 001-32469

XENONICS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		84-1433854
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)
3186 Lionshead Avenue
Carlsbad, California		92010-4701
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (760) 477-8900

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): ¨ Yes x No

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 31, ~~2013~~2014 was approximately $51,~~994~~748,000.

There were 24,975,929 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding on December 4, ~~2013~~2014.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~PART I~~	PART I
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	4
ITEM 1 A.	RISK FACTORS	8
ITEM 1 B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	11
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	11
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	11
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	1112
~~PART II~~	PART II
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	1213
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	1314
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	1314
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	1718
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	1819
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	3740
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	3740
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	3841
~~PART III~~	PART III
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	3942
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	4144
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	4447
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	4548
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	4649
~~PART IV~~	PART IV
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	4750

Introductory Comment

Throughout this annual report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “our company” refer to Xenonics Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and, unless the context indicates otherwise, also includes our subsidiary, Xenonics, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report contains forward-looking statements, which reflect the views of our management with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “projects,” “targets” and similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on the information available to management at this time and which speak only as of this date. Our actual results may differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For a discussion of some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements, please read carefully the information under “Risk Factors.”

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

We design, manufacture and market high-end, high-intensity portable illumination products and low light viewing systems (night vision). Our core product ~~line~~lines consists of lightweight, long-range, ultra-high intensity, multi-purpose illumination ~~products~~and high definition night vision used in a wide variety of applications by the military, law enforcement, security, search and rescue and, to a lesser extent, in commercial markets. ~~The night vision systems are used across the entire spectrum from commercial to the military.~~

We ~~have~~market ~~16 utility~~our ~~and~~illumination ~~design~~products ~~patents~~under ~~issued and 4~~the ~~pending~~NightHunter ~~applications,~~brand ~~including 1~~name ~~granted~~and ~~foreign~~night ~~patent~~vision ~~and~~under 3the ~~pending foreign~~SuperVision ~~applications~~brand. ~~Our~~ ~~illumination~~The ~~line (~~NightHunter) ofseries of products ~~has 10~~is ~~US utility~~produced ~~and~~in ~~design~~a ~~patents~~variety ~~issued,~~of ~~including~~configurations ~~patents~~to ~~for~~suit ~~our~~specific ~~technology~~customer ~~platform,~~needs. ~~which~~These ~~applies~~include ~~high~~compact ~~efficiency~~hand-held ~~dimmable~~systems ~~electronic~~for ~~ballast~~foot-borne ~~circuitry~~ personnel and ~~precision~~systems ~~optics~~mounted to ~~xenon~~weapons, ~~light~~vehicles, totowers ~~produce~~and anbuildings ~~illumination~~and ~~device~~a ~~that~~variety ~~delivers~~of ~~improved~~other ~~performance~~platforms, for ~~over~~hands-free ~~current technologies~~operations. ~~For~~ ~~our~~These ~~night~~NightHunter ~~vision (SuperVision)~~illumination ~~product~~systems ~~line~~are weused ~~have 5~~for USreconnaissance, ~~utility~~surveillance, search and ~~design~~rescue, ~~patents issued~~ physical security, target identification, navigation, and 1 ~~pending US application~~non-lethal deterrence. In ~~addition,~~The ~~for~~systems ~~our~~allow ~~night~~the ~~vision~~user ~~(SuperVision)~~to ~~product~~illuminate an ~~line~~area, wean ~~have 1~~object ~~granted~~or ~~foreign~~a ~~patent~~target ~~and~~with 3visible ~~pending~~or ~~foreign~~non-visible ~~applications~~light, thereby improving visibility.

The SuperVision products bring a new category to night vision using a high resolution HDTV display with an ultra-sensitive image sensor and a proprietary Digital Signal Processor (DSP). This all digital format brings capabilities comparable to high end military analog systems at less than half the price. In addition the digital format provides the ability to zoom. The price and capability opens the market to law enforcement and the military as well as the general consumer, whether in the maritime environment, hunting, camping, security, or any other activity done in a low light situation.

We are largely dependent upon government orders for our revenues. While the night vision products expanded our sales into the commercial market and the international market, the government market, particularly law enforcement, will continue to be a large part of the night vision sales. Existing customers include all branches of the United States Armed Forces and federal, state and local law enforcement.

We ~~market~~have 14 utility ~~our~~and ~~illumination~~design ~~products under the NightHunter brand name~~ patents issued and ~~night~~no ~~vision~~pending ~~under~~applications, ~~the~~including 1 ~~SuperVision~~granted ~~brand~~foreign patent. ~~The~~ Our NightHunter ~~series~~illumination line of products ishas 9 ~~produced~~US utility inand adesign ~~variety~~patents ofissued, ~~configurations~~including topatents ~~suit~~for ~~specific~~our ~~customer~~technology ~~needs.~~platform, ~~These~~which applies ~~include~~high ~~compact~~efficiency ~~hand-held~~dimmable ~~systems~~electronic ~~for~~ballast ~~foot-borne~~circuitry ~~personnel~~ and ~~stabilized~~precision ~~systems~~optics ~~for~~to ~~airborne,~~xenon ~~vehicular~~light ~~and~~to ~~shipboard~~produce ~~use.~~an ~~These NightHunter~~ illumination ~~systems~~device ~~are~~that ~~used~~delivers ~~for~~improved ~~reconnaissance,~~performance ~~surveillance,~~over ~~search~~current ~~and~~technologies. For ~~rescue,~~our ~~physical~~SuperVision ~~security,~~night ~~target~~vision product ~~identification,~~line we ~~navigation,~~have 5 ~~and~~US ~~non-lethal~~utility ~~deterrence.~~and ~~The~~design ~~systems~~patents issued ~~allow~~and ~~the~~no ~~user~~pending toapplications. In ~~illuminate an area~~addition, anfor ~~object~~our orSupervision anight ~~target with~~vision ~~visible~~product ~~or non-visible light~~line, ~~and~~we tohave 1 ~~improve~~granted ~~visibility~~foreign ~~through~~patent ~~many types of obscurants such as smoke, haze~~ and no ~~most~~pending ~~types~~foreign ~~of fog~~applications.

The SuperVision products were launched in June 2007 and bring a new category to night vision using a high resolution HDTV display with an ultra-sensitive infrared image sensor and a proprietary Digital Signal Processor (DSP). This all digital format brings capabilities comparable to high end military analog systems at less than half the price. In addition the digital format provides the ability to zoom. The price and capability opens the market to law enforcement and the military as well as the general consumer, whether in the maritime environment, hunting, camping, security, or any other activity done in a low light situation.

Our Products

The NightHunter ultra-high intensity series of illumination products currently consists of three versatile compact illumination systems — NightHunter ONE, NightHunter EXT, and NightHunter 3, which replaced the NightHunter II~~, all of which have been issued National Stock Numbers (NSN) by the U~~.S. ~~military.~~ The NightHunter ONE is the Department of Defense standard for non-lethal/escalation of force capability sets, while the NightHunter 3 has been added to the U.S. Army Table of Allowance (TOA) for crew-served weapons vehicles and hands-free use. Our products are lightweight, ruggedized for operation in harsh environments, and allow users to illuminate objects with visible or infrared (IR) light at distances of more than one mile. With our infrared filter accessory in place, the NightHunter products emit near-infrared light that is invisible to the naked eye, but when used with night vision devices or low-light cameras, they can illuminate a target without the target knowing that it is being illuminated. Each NightHunter product incorporates a mechanical focusing design that enables the user to vary the flood spread of the beam. For example, the systems can be focused at a 0.5° spread that results in only a 60-90 foot footprint at one mile, or at a 10° spread that results in a 900 foot footprint at one mile. Unlike other high intensity lighting systems (and traditional flashlights), the NightHunter products do not have a “black hole” at the center of the light beam that obstructs the field of view (that is, there is no “blind spot” in the beam), allowing the user to keep the illumination centered on the target area. Our NightHunter One and NightHunter 3 products all have an internal rechargeable battery and built-in charger. In addition, the NightHunter One, NightHunter ext and NightHunter 3 can be operated from external power sources. Depending on the functionality and accessories of the product, the retail prices for our ultra-high intensity products range from $3,000 to over $6,000.

The SuperVision high definition night vision integrates an ultra-sensitive IR/visible image sensor, zoom capability, a HDTV near-eye display and a proprietary Digital Signal Processor (DSP) to bring new capabilities to a wide variety of customers who

~~The SuperVision HDTV display with an ultra-sensitive IR/visible image sensor, zoom capability,~~ ~~and~~work aor ~~proprietary~~play ~~Digital~~at ~~Signal Processor (DSP) brings capability to a wide variety of customers~~night. Operating in both the visible and near infrared spectrum SuperVision allows the user to operate from dusk to dark. SuperVision can operate with or without an illuminator and with its extended IR spectrum in excess of 1,000 nanometers it can operate well past the range of a conventional analog tube night vision system. With a retail price of just $1,799 it is affordable at the local law enforcement level as well as with commercial customers. Since its original introduction, we have expanded the SuperVision product line to specifically address customer needs. These include the SuperVision Tactical Package ~~(2008)~~, the Supervision Video Out ~~(2009)~~ and the SuperVision Patrol Package ~~(2012)~~. The Tactical Package was specifically designed for the law enforcement community and packages the SuperVision with a Tactical IR in a waterproof case. The SuperVision Video Out added the ability to connect video signal to a recording device, monitor or both for surveillance or evidence gathering. This unit runs for up to eight hours on external DC or AC power, as well as its rechargeable battery. The SuperVision Patrol Package provides for the mounting of SuperVision unit inside a patrol vehicle and view, control and record video from the vehicle’s onboard computer. The Patrol Packages also allows situations to be approached at night with lights out to quickly assess what’s occurring at a safe distance from inside the vehicle.

Our currently available products and their respective features are listed below.

NightHunter ONE The NightHunter ONE system is a lightweight (6.1 lbs.) illumination system that can be readily adapted to a variety of uses and platforms, from handheld to fixed mounted use on vehicles, boats, and helicopters. The NightHunter can be powered from its internal rechargeable battery or from any 12-32 VDC power source.

NightHunter EXT The NightHunter EXT is a durable and lightweight (5.5 lbs.) illumination system that is designed for mounting on heavy guns and for use on stationary platforms or vehicles, boats, or helicopters. The NightHunter EXT has the same range and variable beam as the NightHunter ONE. The NightHunter EXT incorporates an integral filter assembly and remote control, as well as a Pictanny mount.

NightHunter 3 The NightHunter 3 was designed to replace and improve upon the NightHunter II capabilities in a light weight weapons mountable system. Utilizing Xenonics proprietary technology and lessons learned, NightHunter 3 is a 3 pound illuminator incorporating an integral filter assembly, new battery technology, and remote control, making it ideal for handheld use or mounting on light, medium and heavy machine guns or vehicles.

SuperVision SuperVision allows the user to see in the dark with greater clarity than conventional night vision, and with a zoom capability. The product is a small hand held device and weighs only 20 ounces. SuperVision retails for significantly less than the high-end night vision products.

SuperVision Video Out SuperVision with Video Out adds the ability to connect the video signal to a computer recording device or monitor for surveillance. This unit runs for up to twenty hours on external DC or AC power, as well as its rechargeable battery.

SuperVision Tactical Package The package was designed to meet the need of law enforcement professionals. It combines SuperVision with the Tactical IR and mount, extra batteries and a portable waterproof case. This has become the primary purchase item for the law enforcement market. This package can also include video-out capability.

SuperVision Vehicle Patrol Package The package was designed specifically to make law enforcement patrol operations safer and more effective at night by providing a mobile handheld device that can be mounted in vehicles and connected to onboard computers to view, control and record activities in total darkness. The SuperVision unit can also be easily dismounted when needed to pursue subjects on foot.

The Markets

The actual and potential markets for our products consist of the following.

Military Forces of the United States and Foreign Allies

Military forces in the United States currently represent the primary target market for our NightHunter products. Through September 30, ~~2013~~2014, we have sold more than $50,000,000 of NightHunter brand illumination systems into this market, which is estimated at over $700,000,000. Our customers include the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Marine Corps.

According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the U.S. Department of Defense, there are nearly 10,400,000 active and reserve troops, approximately 800 warships, and 1,600 amphibious, major mine, and support ships, 60,000 heavy tanks, and 97,000 armored infantry vehicles in the armed forces of the United States and its key allies. Given the large number of applications for NightHunter products, we believe that this represents a substantial market opportunity for the NightHunter product line.

SuperVision has application to the US Military though it was not optimized for military operations. It is listed on the GSA schedule and is also sold through the military exchange network. With the high performance and quality of SuperVision and no export restrictions, we see a good market in the international militaries.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

The agencies of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security represent another key market for NightHunter and SuperVision products. These agencies include the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Transportation Security Administration, the U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Coast Guard. The United States Border Patrol has over 18,000 vehicles, nearly 200 marine vessels and over 1,200 canine teams deployed daily. The United States Coast Guard has a fleet of 252 cutters, 945 shore units and 1,660 boats. FEMA has over 2,600 full-time employees along with 4,000 employees on standby for disaster relief. The TSA oversees security on highway, railroads, buses, mass transit systems, ports and the 450 United States airports. Our NightHunter products have been tested and deployed in key strategic locations for port, waterway, coastline, airport and border security. We believe that the increased concern about homeland security and the higher amounts budgeted for new security products may make homeland security a potentially significant market for both of our product lines. Our goal is for agencies within the United States Department of Homeland Security to use discretionary funding to purchase our products, and we believe that in the future we may achieve specific line items in the budget similar to our experience with the defense budget.

Law Enforcement and Fire, Search & Rescue

We have been actively pursuing additional opportunities for sales of NightHunter illumination systems and SuperVision to law enforcement and fire, search and rescue organizations. We have seen significant traction in this market and we currently have over 100 U.S. local, state, or federal government agencies that have purchased and are using SuperVision. Law enforcement and fire, search and rescue represent a large market opportunity. Approximately 860,000 law enforcement personnel are estimated to be employed in the United States and there are approximately 40,000 fire, search & rescue departments in the United States. In addition, the international market opportunity remains large, primarily with the SuperVision product line. SuperVision products have been sold into Europe, South America, Mexico, and Asia.

Commercial Markets

SuperVision was designed to be a high performance but affordable night vision system. Because of this, we have an excellent opportunity in several domestic and international commercial markets. There are more than 5,100,000 registered maritime vehicles in the world and over 105,000,000 hunters, fisherman and wildlife watchers. There has also been interest from several industrial customers.

Sales & Marketing

We generate most of our revenue from the direct sale of our products to customers. To date, most of our sales have been to the United States military.

Sales & Marketing

We generate most of our revenue from the direct sale of our products to customers. To date, most of our sales have been to the United States military.

Manufacturing

We conduct manufacturing and final assembly operations on the NightHunter One, NightHunter ext, NightHunter 3 and SuperVision products at our headquarters in Carlsbad, California, and own all of the equipment required to manufacture and assemble these finished products. In addition, we also own all molds, schematics, and prototypes utilized by our vendors in the production of the components and sub-assemblies used in our products. We can expand our production capabilities by adding additional personnel with negligible new investment in tooling and equipment.

We currently purchase both commodity off-the-shelf components and custom-designed fabricated parts and sub-assemblies for use in our products from a number of qualified local, national and international suppliers. Although we currently obtain these components from many single source suppliers, we believe we could obtain components from alternative suppliers without incurring significant production delays. We acquire all of our components on a purchase order basis and do not have long-term contracts with suppliers.

Competition

Other companies that offer high intensity, portable lighting products include SureFire, LLC, Polarion-USA and Peak Beam Systems, Inc. We believe that none of these companies currently offers a product with the features or range of applications of our NightHunter series. To our knowledge, only one company, Peak Beam Systems, supplies a short-arc xenon-based product. Peak Beam’s product also has the capability of utilizing infrared and ultraviolet filters, and provides a long-range light beam. However, unlike our products, Peak Beam’s products project a “black hole” and hence an obstructed field-of-view, are not as durable, and are not a self-contained unit with integrated charger and battery.

In addition to these suppliers of hand-held high intensity lighting products, we believe that other companies that use first generation xenon technology, such as Spectrolab (helicopter searchlights), Phoebus (entertainment spotlights), and Strong (entertainment spotlights) could enter our market in the future. Our strategy is to remain the recognized market and technology leader for hand held size systems thus not leaving an opening for the searchlight companies. Furthermore, during 2011 we became an approved supplier of crew served weapons light systems for the Army.

We have chosen an open spot in the market in the night vision market. We deliver in a high definition digital format the capabilities of current analog Gen 3 systems, at about half to one third the price. While our system retails at $1,799, analog Gen 3 systems are typically priced over $3,800. There are also lower performing products, usually analog Gen 1 or 2 systems, in the sub $600 retail range. Since our performance well exceeds these systems, our real competition is with the higher end product.

Regulation

We applied to the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Export Administration for an export license for both SuperVision and NightHunter products. In response to our inquiry, the department assigned an EAR classification of 99. We can export all our products without a license to all countries that are not on the restricted list IAW part 746 of the EAR. Xenonics is registered with the Department of State for any restrictions under the ITAR rules. At this time there are no restrictions on any of our products.

Intellectual Property

We ~~have16~~have 14 utility and design patents issued and 4 no pending applications, including 1 granted foreign patent ~~and 3 pending foreign applications~~. Our NightHunter illumination line ~~(NightHunter)~~ of products has 109 US utility and design patents issued, including patents for our technology platform, which applies high efficiency dimmable electronic ballast circuitry and precision optics to xenon light to produce an illumination device that delivers improved performance over current technologies. For our SuperVision night vision ~~(SuperVision)~~ product line we have 5 US utility and design patents issued and 1 no pending ~~US application~~ applications. In addition, for our Supervision night vision ~~(SuperVision)~~ product line, we have 1 granted foreign patent and 3 no pending foreign applications.

In addition to the foregoing patents, we also rely on certain know-how and trade secrets related to the design and manufacture of our products. We believe that the patents (both granted and pending) and our know-how and trade secrets provide protection to certain of our core technologies, and allow us to develop future products that can be scaled up or down (or to develop alternative packages for the existing products). We are not aware of any infringement of our patents or that we are infringing any patents owned by others.

Our “NightHunter”, “Xenonics” and “SuperVision” trademarks have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Research and Development

We maintain a research and development program for the development and introduction of new products and accessories and for the development of enhancements and improvements to our existing products. In addition, we collaborate closely with certain of our largest customers in the design and improvement of our products to suit their respective needs. As such, we consider our research and development program to be an important element of our business, operations and future success.

Our research and development efforts currently are focused on (i) improving our current product line, (ii) designing and developing product line extensions that employ our proprietary illumination and electronics platforms, and (iii) designing and developing new products complementary to our existing products. We maintain an active research and development program at our facilities in Carlsbad, California, and as needed we retain outside consultants who can provide any necessary additional engineering or technological expertise. We also regularly work with our outside vendors and manufacturers to improve product performance and manufacturability, and to reduce manufacturing costs.

During the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, we spent $~~343~~362,000 and $~~720~~343,000, respectively, on research and development.

Employees

As of September 30, ~~2013~~2014, we employed 10 persons. There are three officers on our executive management team, three persons are employed in operations, one ~~persons~~person in engineering, one person in customer service and two persons in administrative support. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock is subject to a high degree of risk. The risks described below should be carefully considered, as well as the other information contained in this annual report. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In such event, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline.

Risks Related to Our Business

Uncertainty as a Going Concern.

Our future existence remains uncertain and the report of our independent auditors on our financial statements for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 includes an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to continue as a going concern. We have suffered substantial losses from operations and require additional financing. During the year ended September 30, 2014 the Company raised $1,426,000 of additional financing. Ultimately we need to generate additional revenues and attain profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate additional revenue or obtain additional financing.

Fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results make it difficult to assure future positive cash flows from operations.

For the most recent fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, we had a net loss of $1,542,000 on revenues of $2,383,000, compared to a net loss of $2,189,000 on revenues of $2,164,000 for the year ended September 30, 2012. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, we had a net loss of $92,000 on revenues of $7,179,000. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, we had a net loss of $1,781,000 on revenues of $4,397,000. For the year ended September 30, 2009, we had a net loss of $1,839,000 on revenues of $7,378,000. For the year ended September 30, 2008, we had a net loss of $1,391,000 on revenues of $10,168,000. For the year ended September 30, 2007, we had a net loss of $4,034,000 on revenues of $4,984,000. For the year ended September 30, 2006, we had a net loss of $1,488,000 on revenues of $4,833,000. For the year ended September 30, 2005, we had a net loss of $5,310,000 on revenues of $4,434,000. For the year ended September 30, 2004, we recorded net income of $1,476,000 on revenues of $11,927,000. Since our revenues are primarily dependent upon the receipt of large orders from the military and other governmental organizations, which orders are sporadic and unpredictable, our revenues fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year. No assurance can be given that we will generate sales at any specific levels or that any additional sales that may be generated will result in the profitability or viability of our Company.

Fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results make it difficult to assure future positive cash flows from operations.

For the most recent fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, we had a net loss of $2,597,000 on revenues of $830,000, compared to a net loss of $1,542,000 on revenues of $2,383,000 for the year ended September 30, 2013. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, we had a net loss of $2,189,000 on revenues of $2,164,000. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, we had a net loss of $92,000 on revenues of $7,179,000. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, we had a net loss of $1,781,000 on revenues of $4,397,000. Since our revenues are primarily dependent upon the receipt of large orders from the military and other governmental organizations, for which orders are sporadic and unpredictable, our revenues fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year. No assurance can be given that we will generate sales at any specific levels or that any additional sales that may be generated will result in the profitability or viability of our Company.

The loss of contracts with U.S. government agencies would adversely affect our revenue.

To date, substantially all of our sales have been derived from sales to military and security organizations, such as the U.S. military, and various other governmental law enforcement agencies. While we believe that we will continue to be successful in marketing our products to these entities, there are certain considerations and limitations inherent in sales to governmental or municipal entities such as budgetary constraints, timing of procurement, political considerations, and listing requirements that are beyond our control and could affect our future sales. There is no assurance that we will be able to achieve our targeted sales objectives to these governmental and municipal entities or that we will continue to generate any material sales to these entities in the future.

Potential customers may prefer our competitors’ technology and products.

The ultra-high intensity lighting industry, in which we operate, is characterized by mature products and established industry participants. We compete with other providers of specialized lights in the United States and abroad who have created or are developing technologies and products that are similar to the products we are selling to many of the same purchasers in our targeted markets. Although we believe that our competitors do not offer products as advanced as ours, competition from these companies is intense. Because we are currently a small company with a limited marketing budget, our ability to compete effectively will depend on the benefits of our technology and on our patents. There is no assurance that potential customers will select our technology over that of a competitor, or that a competitor will not market a competing technology with operating characteristics similar to those owned by us.

The loss of any of our key personnel could adversely affect our business.

We depend on the efforts of our senior management, particularly Alan P. Magerman, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Jeffrey P. Kennedy, our Chief Operating Officer and President. The loss of the services of one or both of these individuals could delay or prevent us from achieving our objectives.

The interests of our current shareholders will be diluted if we seek additional equity financing in the future, and any debt financing that we seek in the future will expose us to the risk of default and insolvency.

We are dependent on our ability to obtain sales orders and/or additional equity or debt financing to continue to support planned operations and satisfy obligations. The Company’s marketing activity has been intensified and management remains optimistic about our growth opportunity. However, due to the nature of our business, there is no assurance that we will receive new orders during the quarters that we expect them. Although management believes it can obtain additional financing, there is no certainty that it can. Any equity financing may involve dilution of the interests of our current shareholders, and any debt financing would subject us to the risks associated with leverage, including the possible risk of default and insolvency.

We may experience production delays if suppliers fail to deliver materials to us, which could reduce our revenue.

The manufacturing process for our products consists primarily of the assembly of purchased components. Although we can obtain materials and purchase components from different suppliers, we rely on certain suppliers for our components. If a supplier should cease to deliver such components, this could result in added cost and manufacturing delays and have an adverse effect on our business.

Any delay in our ability to market, sell or ship our existing products would adversely affect our revenue.

To date, all of our revenues have been generated from the sales of our NightHunter illumination system products—the NightHunter One, NightHunter II (now discontinued), NightHunter 3 and NightHunter ext— related accessories and SuperVision. In addition to the NightHunter models and SuperVision with tactical illumination, we are now marketing the NightHunter 3. The profitability and viability of our Company is dependent upon our continued ability to manufacture, sell and ship our illumination products and SuperVision, and any delay or interruption in our ability to market, sell, or ship our NightHunter illumination systems or SuperVision and related accessories will have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Any delay in our ability to market, sell or ship our existing products would adversely affect our revenue.

To date, all of our revenues have been generated from the sales of our NightHunter illumination system products - the NightHunter One, NightHunter II (now discontinued), NightHunter 3 and NightHunter ext - related accessories and SuperVision. In addition to the NightHunter models and SuperVision with tactical illumination, we are now marketing the NightHunter 3. The profitability and viability of our Company is dependent upon our continued ability to manufacture, sell and ship our illumination products and SuperVision, and any delay or interruption in our ability to market, sell, or ship our NightHunter illumination systems or SuperVision and related accessories will have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. However, the Company has never missed a required delivery date for orders received.

Further, our future growth and profitability will depend on our ability to successfully expand NightHunter, SuperVision and other products. While our goal is to develop and commercialize a line of ultra-high intensity illumination systems, and digital low-light viewing devices, new products will require substantial expenditures for development and advertising. There is no guarantee that the market will accept these new products. If we are unable to develop and release other products, the future of our Company will depend on the commercial success of our existing NightHunter products and SuperVision.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

You may be unable to sell your shares at an adequate price or at all.

There is no assurance as to the depth or liquidity of any market for our common stock or the prices at which holders may be able to sell the shares. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. Due to these conditions, there is no assurance that shareholders will be able to sell their shares at or near ask prices or at all.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research reports about our business or if they downgrade our stock, the price of our common stock could decline.

Small, relatively unknown companies can achieve visibility in the trading market through research reports that industry or securities analysts publish. The lack of published reports by independent securities analysts could limit the interest in our common stock and negatively affect our stock price. We do not have any control over the research reports these analysts publish or whether they will be published at all. If any analyst who does cover us downgrades our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If any analyst ceases coverage of our Company or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

Anti-takeover provisions in our articles of incorporation could adversely affect the value of our common stock.

Our articles of incorporation contain certain provisions that could impede a non-negotiated change in control. In particular, without shareholder approval we can issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with rights and preferences determined by the board of directors. These provisions could make a hostile takeover or other non-negotiated change in control difficult.

The future issuance of additional common and preferred stock could dilute existing shareholders.

We are currently authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of common stock. To the extent that common shares are available for issuance, our board of directors has the ability, without seeking shareholder approval, to issue additional shares of common stock in the future for such consideration as the board of directors may consider sufficient. The issuance of additional common stock in the future will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of the common stock held by our existing shareholders. The Company can increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, but only with shareholder approval.

We are also authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, the rights and preferences of which may be designated in series by the board of directors. Such designation of new series of preferred stock may be made without shareholder approval and could create additional securities which would have dividend and liquidation preferences over our common stock. Preferred shareholders could adversely affect the rights of holders of common stock by:

•

exercising voting, redemption and conversion rights to the detriment of the holders of common stock;

•

receiving preferences over the holders of common stock or surplus funds in the event of our dissolution or liquidation;

•

delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company; and

•

discouraging bids for our common stock.

We do not plan to pay any cash dividends on our common stock.

We do not plan to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any decision to pay dividends is within the discretion of the board of directors and will depend upon our profitability at the time, cash available and other factors. As a result, there is no assurance that there will ever be any cash dividends or other distributions on our common stock.

The exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants would dilute the ownership interests of our existing shareholders.

There are currently outstanding stock options and warrants entitling the holders to purchase 810,~~504~~674,000 shares of our common stock, including a number of options granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants that are subject to vesting and financial performance conditions. These options and warrants have exercise prices ranging from $0.1412 per share to $0.65 per share. It is likely that many of the holders of these options and warrants will exercise and sell shares of our common stock when the stock price exceeds their exercise price. Substantial option and warrant exercises and subsequent stock sales by our option and warrant holders would significantly dilute the ownership interests of our existing shareholders.

The conversion of outstanding convertible debt would dilute the ownership interests of our existing shareholders.

Currently we have $981,000 of three-year convertible notes payable with interest at 13% per annum entitling note holders to purchase 14,014,000 shares of our common stock at $0.07 per share. It is likely that many of the note holders will exercise and sell shares of our common stock when the stock price exceeds their conversion price. Substantial conversions and subsequent stock sales by our note holders would significantly dilute the ownership interests of our existing shareholders.

Future sales of common stock by our existing shareholders and option and warrant holders could cause our stock price to decline.

The release into the public market of a large number of freely tradable shares and restricted securities that are now eligible or subsequently become eligible for public resale under Rule 144 could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. The perception among investors that these sales may occur could produce the same adverse effect on our market price.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our principal operations and executive offices are located at 3186 Lionshead Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92010 and our telephone number is (760) 477-8900. The Company moved into new facilities in January 2009, under the terms of a lease that was to expire in March 2014. The lease was amended in January 2013 and will now expire in March 2019. This facility consists of approximately 13,200 square feet of leased office, warehouse and manufacturing space.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are occasionally subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. It is impossible for us to predict with any certainty the outcome of pending disputes, and we cannot predict whether any liability arising from pending claims and litigation will be material in relation to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

1112

PART II

Our common stock is currently traded under the symbol “XNNH” on the OTCQB. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock.

Year ended September 30, 2014	High		Low
First Quarter	$	0.15	$	0.08
Second Quarter	$	0.15	$	0.06
Third Quarter	$	0.17	$	0.06
Fourth Quarter	$	0.22	$	0.11
Year ended September 30, 2013	High		Low
First Quarter	$	0.41	$	0.10
Second Quarter	$	0.23	$	0.15
Third Quarter	$	0.20	$	0.14
Fourth Quarter	$	0.19	$	0.06
Year ended September 30, 2012	High		Low
First Quarter	$	0.38	$	0.15
Second Quarter	$	0.29	$	0.14
Third Quarter	$	0.34	$	0.20
Fourth Quarter	$	0.42	$	0.20

As of September 30, ~~2013~~2014, there were 24,975,929 common shares outstanding and 41 shareholders of record, not including shareholders who hold their stock in “street name”.

Dividends

The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock. The Company currently anticipates that it will retain all future earnings for use in its business. Consequently, it does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our results of operations, as well as our short-term and long-term cash availability, working capital, working capital needs and other factors, as determined by our Board of Directors. Currently, except as may be provided by applicable laws, there are no contractual or other restrictions on our ability to pay dividends if we were to decide to declare and pay them.

Repurchase of Securities

The Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock during the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The Company has previously reported all equity securities that it sold during the period covered by this annual report that were not registered under the Securities Act.

1213

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes as of September 30, 2013, the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding derivative securities (options, warrants and rights); the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding derivative securities; and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans.

Plan Category	Number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights		Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights		Number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensation plans(excluding column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		2,305,000	$	0.18		21,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		100,000	$	0.50		—
Totals		2,405,000	$	0.19		21,000

The equity compensation plans approved by the security holders are the 2003 Stock Option Plan of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. Except as described in the following paragraph, the Company has not adopted without the approval of security holders any equity compensation plan under which securities of the issuer are authorized for issuance.

On November 11, 2009 the Company entered into an agreement with an independent firm to conduct institutional investor services for a period of one year. As part of this agreement the Company issued a five year warrant, vested upon issuance, to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of SEC Regulation S-K.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as information contained elsewhere in this report, contain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of management, our directors or our officers with respect to, among other things: anticipated financial or operating results, financial projections, business prospects, future product performance and other matters that are not historical facts. The success of our business operations is dependent on factors such as the impact of competitive products, product development, commercialization and technology difficulties, the results of financing efforts and the effectiveness of our marketing strategies, general competitive and economic conditions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those described under “Risk Factors” above.

Overview

We design, manufacture and market high-end, high-intensity portable illumination products and low light viewing systems (night vision). Our core product line consists of lightweight, long-range, ultra-high intensity illumination products used in a wide variety of applications by the military, law enforcement, security, search and rescue and, to a lesser extent, in commercial markets. The night vision system is used across the entire spectrum from commercial to the military. We hold several patents for our technology platform, which applies high efficiency dimmable electronic ballast circuitry and precision optics to xenon light to produce an illumination device that delivers improved performance over current technologies, and additional patents to the integration of the night vision system.

13We are largely dependent upon government orders for our revenues. While the night vision products could expand our sales into the commercial market, the government market, particularly law enforcement, will continue to be a large part of the night vision sales. Existing customers include all branches of the United States Armed Forces and federal law enforcement.

We market our illumination products under the NightHunter brand name and night vision under the SuperVision brand. The NightHunter series of products is produced in a variety of configurations to suit specific customer needs. These include compact hand-held systems for foot-borne personnel and stabilized systems for airborne, vehicular and shipboard use. These NightHunter illumination systems are used for reconnaissance, surveillance, search and rescue, physical security, target identification and navigation. The systems allow the user to illuminate an area, an object or a target with visible or non-visible light, and to improve visibility through many types of obscurants such as smoke, haze and most types of fog.

The SuperVision product uses a high resolution HDTV display with an ultra-sensitive IR/visible sensor and a proprietary Digital Signal Processor. This all digital format brings capabilities comparable to high end military analog systems at less than half the price. In addition the digital format allows for zoom capability. The price and capability opens the market to law enforcement and the general consumer, whether in the maritime environment, hunting, camping, security, or any other activity done in a low light situation.

We conduct all of our operations through our subsidiary, Xenonics, Inc.

How We Generate Revenue

We generate most of our revenue from the direct sale of our products to customers. To date, most of our sales have been to the United States military.

We are largely dependent upon government orders for our revenues. While the night vision products could expand our sales into the commercial market, the government market, particularly law enforcement, will continue to be a large part of the night vision sales. Existing customers include all branches of the United States Armed Forces and federal law enforcement.

We conduct all of our operations through our subsidiary, Xenonics, Inc.

How We Generate Revenue

We generate most of our revenue from the direct sale of our products to customers. To date, most of our sales have been to the United States military.

Trends in Our Business

The Company has not had revenue sufficient to generate net income in the last five years. In order to improve our revenue , we are focusing on improving our current products, introducing new products and expanding our customer base. In addition to an ongoing effort to improve revenue, we continually seek to lower costs wherever possible to improve our operating margin.

Our current challenge is to supplement government sales with commercial sales of both our current products and new products. Risks include new competitors entering the market, decreases in government budgets (particularly the defense budget) and our ability to penetrate other markets.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the period reported. The following accounting policies involve a “critical accounting estimate” because they are particularly dependent on estimates and assumptions made by management about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimates are made. In addition, while we have used our best estimates based on facts and circumstances available to us at the time, different estimates reasonably could have been used in the current period, and changes in the accounting estimates we used are reasonably likely to occur from period to period which may have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations. We review these estimates and assumptions periodically and reflect the effects of revisions in the period that they are determined to be necessary.

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable – - The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment and transfer of title and when it has evidence that payment arrangements exist and the price to the buyer is fixed through signed contracts or purchase orders. Collectability is reasonably assured through one or more of the following: government purchase, historical payment practices or review of new customer credit. Customers do not have the right to return product unless it is damaged or defective.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Credit evaluations are undertaken for all major sales transactions before shipment is authorized. Normal terms require payment on a net 30 basis depending on the customer. On an ongoing basis, we analyze the payment history of customer accounts, including recent purchases. We evaluate aged items in accounts receivable and provide reserves for doubtful accounts. Customer creditworthiness and economic conditions may change, including increased risk of collectability and sales returns, and may require additional provisions, which could negatively impact our operating results.

14Tax Valuation Allowance –A tax valuation allowance is established, as needed, to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount for which recovery is probable. We have established a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets because of our history of losses. In the event it becomes more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance. Depending on the amount and timing of taxable income we ultimately generate in the future, as well as other factors, we could recognize no benefit from our deferred tax assets, in accordance with our current estimate, or we could recognize a portion of or their full value.

Tax Valuation Allowance – A tax valuation allowance is established, as needed, to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount for which recovery is probable. We have established a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets because of our history of losses. In the event it becomes more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance. Depending on the amount and timing of taxable income we ultimately generate in the future, as well as other factors, we could recognize no benefit from our deferred tax assets, in accordance with our current estimate, or we could recognize a portion of or their full value.

Inventory Valuation – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using weighted average cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company may also provide inventory allowances based on excess and obsolete inventories determined primarily by future demand forecasts.

A physical inventory is completed on a monthly basis, and adjustments are made based on such inventories. If it is determined that our estimates of the valuation of inventories are incorrect, we may need to establish reserves, which would negatively affect any future earnings.

Goodwill - We review goodwill for possible impairment or loss of value at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when circumstances indicate that a reporting unit’s carrying amount is greater than its fair value. At September 30, 2014, we performed a goodwill impairment evaluation. We performed a qualitative assessment of factors to determine whether it was necessary to perform the goodwill impairment test. Based on the results of our analysis, we concluded an impairment test was required. Based on the results of our impairment test, we have concluded that an impairment loss was not warranted at September 30, 2014.

Derivative Liabilities – The Company accounts for the convertible notes payable in accordance with ASC 815 which defines determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is solely indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under ASC 815 the Company is required to (1) evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions. The derivative liabilities are remeasured at fair value at the end of each reporting period as long as they are outstanding.

Results of Operations

Year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 compared to September 30, ~~2012~~2013

We operate in the security lighting systems and night vision industries. The majority of our revenues were derived from sales of our illumination products to various customers, primarily the military.

Revenues: Revenues for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 were $2830,~~383,~~000 compared to revenues of $2,~~164~~383,000 for the year ended September 30, ~~2012~~2013. In the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014, we sold $2802,~~279,~~000 or 9597% of our NightHunter products to the U.S. Government, which includes both direct sales to the military (U.S. Army and U.S. Marines and military resellers) as well as domestic and international military resellers. This compares to $12,~~626~~279,000 or 7595% of revenue to the military market (U.S. Army, U.S. Marines and military resellers) in ~~2012~~2013. Shipments to military, law enforcement and commercial customers of our SuperVision product accounted for 53% of revenues for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and 255% for the year ended September 30, ~~2012~~2013.

Cost of Goods and Gross Profit: Cost of goods consist of our cost of manufacturing our NightHunter One, NightHunter 3 and SuperVision products.

The gross profit percentage on revenue was 3932% and 3839% for the years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, respectively. The decrease in the gross profit percentage was caused by lower sales and the change in product mix which has varying margins.

Selling, General and Administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $~~475~~68,000 to $1,~~655~~587,000 for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 as compared to $21,~~130~~655,000 for the year ended September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The reduction is primarily attributable to decreases in Board and management compensation and benefits of $~~219~~97,000, inand ~~non-cash~~investor ~~compensation~~relations expenses ~~for~~of ~~warrants~~$48,000, ~~issued~~offset ~~and~~by ~~modified~~increases ~~and~~in ~~issued~~consulting tofees ~~consultants~~ of $~~227~~36,000 and inhigher ~~marketing~~legal ~~and travel~~ expenses of $5248,000.

Research & Development: Research and development expenses ~~decreased~~increased by $~~377~~19,000 to $~~343~~362,000 for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 as compared to $~~720~~343,000 for the year ended September 30, ~~2012~~2013. ~~During~~Lower sales for the year ended September 30, ~~2013, the Company had fewer research and production staff personnel that had been used for the further development~~ ~~of the Company’s product lines. In addition~~2014, inproduced ~~fiscal~~higher ~~year 2013 the Company spent $34,000 less on outside~~ engineering ~~expenses~~overhead ~~and $32,000 less on legal costs for patents compared to fiscal year 2012~~charges.

Other ~~Income / Expense~~Expenses: For the years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, Other ~~income~~expenses ~~and~~includes ~~expense~~a ~~includes~~derivative ~~interest expense~~loss for fiscal year 2014 of $~~464~~248,000, compared to none for fiscal year 2013. Derivative liabilities recorded as of September 30, 2014 include convertible debt instruments with variable conversion elements and warrant liabilities. Interest expense for the year ended September 30, 2014 was $~~162~~631,000 compared to $467,000 ~~respectively~~for fiscal year 2013. Included in the current year interest expense is $204,000 of non-cash expenses related to the new convertible notes payable. The increase of $~~302~~164,000 is attributed to ~~interest~~the ~~expense~~increase in interest for additional notes payable, ~~including~~and ~~$185,000~~debt ofdiscount amortization offor ~~debt~~the ~~discount~~new convertible notes payable.

Provision for Income Taxes: For the ~~year~~years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, ~~had~~the noprovision ~~interest~~for income ~~compared~~tax towas $12,000, ~~for~~which represents the ~~year~~minimum ~~ended~~annual ~~September 30,~~payments ~~2012~~for state taxes.

~~Provision~~Net ~~for Income Taxes~~Loss: ~~For~~Lower ~~the~~sales ~~years~~and ~~ended~~increases ~~September 30,~~in ~~2013~~other ~~and~~expenses ~~2012,~~in the current ~~provision~~year accounted for ~~income~~a ~~tax~~net ~~was~~loss of $2,~~000~~597,000 ~~which represents~~when ~~the~~compared ~~minimum~~to ~~annual~~a ~~payments~~net loss of $1,542,000 for ~~state~~the ~~taxes~~prior year.

Net Loss: A reduction in expenses in the current year accounted for a net loss of $1,542,000 when compared to a net loss of $2,189,000 for the prior year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. As reflected in the ~~accompanying~~ accompanying financial statements, we have an accumulated deficit of $2729,~~253~~849,000 as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014. Our continued existence is dependent on our ability to obtain orders for our products and/or additional equity and/or debt financing to ~~support~~ support planned operations and satisfy obligations. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain enough orders for our products or additional financing to support our current operations.

Historically, we have invested substantial resources in the development of our products and in the establishment of our business, which negatively impacted our cost structure and created the accumulated deficit of $2729,~~253~~849,000. Our net loss of $12,~~542~~597,000 negatively impacted cash. Significant sources of cash provided by operating activities included a decrease in inventories of $~~483~~453,000 and an increase in accounts payable of $~~118~~193,000. Cash used in operating activities totaled $~~587~~1,315,000. Cash flows provided by financing activities included $~~450~~300,000 of proceeds (net of repayments) from notes payable. ~~Cash~~and ~~used for investing activities during the year ended September 30, 2013 included the purchase of computer equipment of~~ $10981,000. ~~Currently~~from convertible wenotes ~~do not anticipate any material capital expenditures during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014~~payable.

As16 of September 30, 2013, the Company had working capital of $730,000 and a current ratio of 2.0 to 1 as compared to working capital of $1,114,000 and a current ratio of 1.7 to 1 as of September 30, 2012. Cash on hand at the end of the year decreased by $147,000 from the amount of cash on hand as of September 30, 2012.

Currently we do not anticipate any material capital expenditures during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015.

As of September 30, 2014, the Company had working capital of $39,000 and a current ratio of 1.03 to 1 as compared to working capital of $730,000 and a current ratio of 2.0 to 1 as of September 30, 2013. Cash on hand at the end of the year decreased by $90,000 from the amount of cash on hand as of September 30, 2013.

As discussed in Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, all of the note holders have agreed to extend the due dates to June 23, 2017.

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our business or operations.

We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements and do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. In addition, we have no financial guarantees, debt or lease agreements or other arrangements that could trigger a requirement for an early payment or that could change the value of our assets.

Based on the amount of working capital that we had on hand on September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and the amount of unfilled and potential domestic and international orders we have pending, we are optimistic about our ability to obtain sales orders and/or additional equity or debt financing to continue to support planned operations and satisfy obligations. Management remains optimistic about our growth opportunity. However, due to the nature of our business, there is no assurance that we will receive new orders during the quarters that we expect them and although management believes it can obtain additional financing, there is no certainty that it can. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

1617

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of SEC Regulation S-K

1718

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

XENONICS HOLDINGS, INC.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			1920
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012			20 21
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 and 2013 Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013			21 22
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012			22
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013			23
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012			23
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013			24
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			2425

1819

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Xenonics Holdings, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and subsidiary (collectively, the “Company”) as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audit~~audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has historically suffered recurring losses from operations, has a substantial accumulated deficit and has limited revenues. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

SingerLewak LLP

Irvine, California

~~December~~January 1913, ~~2013~~2015

1920

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Rounded in thousands, except par value	September 30,
	September 30,
	2013			2012
	2014			2013
Rounded to the nearest thousand, except par value
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~220~~130,000		$	~~367~~220,000
Accounts receivable		30432,000			5830,000
Inventories		1,154,000			2,117,000
Inventories, net		701,000			1,154,000
Other current assets		27,000			82,000
Deferred financing costs, current portion		55,000			—
Total Current Assets		1,431,000			2,624,000
Other current assets		19,000			27,000
Inventories		480,000			—
Total Current Assets		1,337,000			1,431,000
Equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements at cost, net		11,000			14,000
Inventories, net Equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements at cost, net		444,000 5,000			480,000 11,000
Deferred financing costs, less current portion, net		103,000			—
Goodwill		375,000			375,000
Other assets		1720,000			17,000
Total Assets	$	2,~~314~~284,000		$	32,~~030~~314,000
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	~~399~~593,000		$	~~281~~399,000
Accrued expenses		~~211~~207,000			~~134~~153,000
Accrued payroll and related taxes Notes payable		91,000 —			95,000 1,000,000
Accrued payroll and related taxes Accrued interest		131,000367,000			91,000 58,000
Total Current Liabilities		~~701~~1,298,000			1701,~~510,~~000
Notes payable, net of debt discount		12,~~962~~271,000			~~525~~1,962,000
Total Liabilities		2,663,000			2,035,000
Derivative liabilities		904,000			—
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount		74,000			—
Shareholders’ equity (deficit):
Total Liabilities		4,547,000			2,663,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholders’ deficit:
Preferred shares, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common shares, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2013 and 2012; 24,976,000 shares issued as of September 30, 2013 and 2012; 24,976,000 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and 2012		25,000			25,000
Common shares, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2014 and 2013; 24,976,000 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and 2013		25,000			25,000
Additional paid-in capital		2627,~~879~~561,000			26,~~681~~879,000
Accumulated deficit		(2729,~~253~~849,000	)		(2527,~~711~~253,000	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)		(349,000	)		995,000
Total Shareholders’ Deficit		(2,263,000	)		(349,000	)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	2,314,000		$	3,030,000
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit	$	2,284,000		$	2,314,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2021

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Years ended September 30,
Rounded to the nearest thousand, except per share amounts	Years ended September 30,
Rounded in thousands, except per share amounts	2013			2012
	2014			2013
Revenue, net	$	2830,~~383,~~000		$	2,~~164~~383,000
Cost of goods sold		1566,~~458,~~000			1,~~341~~458,000
Gross profit		~~925~~264,000			~~823~~925,000
Selling, general and administrative		1,~~655~~587,000			21,~~130~~655,000
Research and development		~~343~~362,000			~~720~~343,000
Income (loss) from operations		(1,073,000	)		(2,027,000	)
Loss from operations		(1,685,000	)		(1,073,000	)
Other income (expense):
Other expenses:
Other income		—			1,000
Interest expense		(631,000	)		(467,000	)
Interest income		—			1,000
Amortization of deferred financing costs		(31,000	)		—
Interest (expense)		(467,000	)		(162,000	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(248,000	)		—
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes		(1,540,000	)		(2,187,000	)
Loss before provision for income taxes		(2,595,000	)		(1,540,000	)
Income tax provision		2,000			2,000
Net income (loss)	$	(1,542,000	)	$	(2,189,000	)
Net loss	$	(2,597,000	)	$	(1,542,000	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.09	)
Basic and fully-diluted	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.06	)
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic and diluted		24,976,000			24,976,000
Basic and fully-diluted		24,976,000			24,976,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2122

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Rounded in thousands	Common Stock				Additional		Accumulated
Rounded to the nearest thousand	Common Stock				AdditionalPaid-In Capital		AccumulatedDeficit			Total
	Shares		Amount		~~Paid-In Capital~~		~~Deficit~~			~~Total~~
Balances at September 30, 2011		24,976,000	$	25,000	$	26,652,000	$	(23,522,000	)	$	3,155,000
Balances at September 30, 2012		24,976,000	$	25,000	$	26,681,000	$	(25,710,000	)	$	996,000
Compensation charge for warrants issued						29,000					29,000
Warrants issued for new loans and extensions						198,000					198,000
Net loss								(2,189,000	)		(2,189,000	)
Balances at September 30, 2012		24,976,000	$	25,000	$	26,681,000	$	(25,711,000	)	$	995,000
Compensation charge for warrants issued for new loans and extensions						198,000					198,000
Net loss								(1,542,000	)		(1,542,000	)
Balances at September 30, 2013		24,976,000	$	25,000	$	26,879,000	$	(27,~~253~~252,000	)	$	(~~349~~348,000	)
Warrants issued for new loans and extensions						87,000					87,000
Beneficial conversion feature in convertible notes						595,000					595,000
Net loss								(2,597,000	)		(2,597,000	)
Balances at September 30, 2014		24,976,000	$	25,000	$	27,561,000	$	(29,849,000	)	$	(2,263,000	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2223

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Years ended September 30,
Rounded to the nearest thousand	Years ended September 30,
Rounded in thousands	2013			2012
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss)	$	(1,542,000	)	$	(2,189,000	)
Net loss	$	(2,597,000	)	$	(1,542,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		146,000			2014,000
Provision for bad debts		—			(2,000	)
Amortization of debt discount and non-cash interest expense on convertible notes		330,000			185,000
Non-cash compensation for warrants issued		—			29,000
Inventory reserve		36,000			—
Non-cash compensation to consultants		—			199,000
Amortization of deferred financing costs		8,000			—
Amortization of warrants for notes payable		185,000			66,000
Change in fair value of derivative liability		248,000			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		27(402,000	)		~~217~~27,000
Inventories		~~483~~453,000			~~425~~483,000
Other current assets		555,000			~~(37~~55,000	)
Accounts payable		~~118~~193,000			~~(133~~118,000	)
Accrued expenses		7756,000			3548,000
Accrued payroll and related taxes		(4,000	)		(1,000	)
Accrued interest		309,000			29,000
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(587,000	)		(1,371,000	)
Accrued payroll and related taxes		40,000			(4,000	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,315,000	)		(587,000	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of equipment, furniture and fixtures		~~(10,000~~—	)		—(10,000	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(10,000	)		—
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(10,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds of notes payable		~~450~~445,000			1450,000~~,000~~
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		450,000			1,000,000
Repayments of debt		(145,000	)		—
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(147,000	)		(371,000	)
Proceeds of convertible notes payable		981,000			—
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		367,000			738,000
Deferred financing costs		(56,000	)		—
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	220,000		$	367,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,225,000			450,000
Net decrease in cash		(90,000	)		(147,000	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		220,000			367,000
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	130,000		$	220,000
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for income taxes	$	~~2,000~~—		$	2,000
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	~~213,000~~—		$	~~118~~213,000
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:
The Company issued warrants to purchase shares of common stock for the extension of notes payable. The fair value of the warrants was recorded as debt discount and additional paid in capital	$	198,000		$	—
The Company issued warrants to purchase shares of common stock for the extension of notes payable
The fair value of the warrants was recorded as debt discount and additional paid in capital	$	87,000		$	198,000
The Company issued warrants to purchase shares of common stock as deferred financing costs in conjunction with convertible notes payable offerings	$	110,000		$	—
Debt discount was recorded for the beneficial conversion feature in conjunction with convertible notes payable	$	595,000		$	—
Debt discount was recorded for the derivative liability created in conjunction with convertible notes payable	$	546,000		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

2324

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. OPERATIONS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS

Xenonics, Inc. (Xenonics) was organized under the laws of the state of Delaware in November 1996. Xenonics was formed to develop and commercialize compact, ultra-high intensity illumination products, based on patented technology. Xenonics markets its products directly to end users on a contract and purchase order basis in a variety of markets for military, law enforcement, security, and search and rescue applications.

In July 2003, Xenonics completed a reorganization with Digital Home Theater Systems, Inc. (DHTS), a Nevada corporation that had previously operated as a multimedia service provider. DHTS had discontinued operations in 1999. In connection with the transaction, DHTS acquired 100% of Xenonics. Upon the closing of the reorganization, DHTS changed its name to Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (Holdings), together with Xenonics, collectively, the “Company”. The transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization of Xenonics with an issuance of common stock for cash. Although Holdings was the legal acquirer in the transaction, Xenonics was the accounting acquirer and, as such, its historical financial statements will continue. No goodwill was recorded as a result of the transaction.

On December 14, 2004, one warrant holder of Xenonics exercised warrants to purchase 125,000 shares of Xenonics, Inc. Effective December 10, 2008 the Company repurchased these shares in exchange for 275,000 shares of the Company, with a guaranteed value of $375,000, thus resulting in Xenonics, Inc. becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

2. GOING CONCERN

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred losses since inception of $2729,~~253~~849,000 and currently has revenues which are insufficient to cover its operating costs, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern.

The future of the Company as an operating business will depend on its ability to (1) obtain sufficient capital contributions and/or financing as may be required to sustain its operations and (2) to achieve adequate revenues from its businesses. Management’s plan to address these issues includes, (a) continued exercise of tight cost controls to conserve cash, (b) obtaining additional financing, and (c) identifying and executing on additional revenue generating opportunities.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation –- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and its 100% owned subsidiary Xenonics.

Use of Estimates –- The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s most significant estimates relate to:

~~Cash~~• ~~and~~Allowance ~~Cash Equivalents~~for –Doubtful Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company considers highly liquid money market investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with high-credit quality financial institutions. At times, such amounts may exceed federally insured limits; however, the Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash equivalent accounts. Accounts

24• Tax Valuation Allowance

•

Inventory Valuation

•

Goodwill Impairment

•

Derivative Liabilities

~~Equipment,~~Cash ~~Furniture~~ and ~~Leasehold~~Cash ~~Improvements~~Equivalents –- ~~Equipment,~~Financial ~~furniture~~instruments ~~and~~that ~~leasehold~~potentially subject the Company to ~~improvements~~concentrations ~~are~~of ~~stated~~credit atrisk ~~cost~~consist ~~less~~primarily ~~accumulated~~of ~~depreciation~~cash ~~which~~and iscash ~~computed~~equivalents. ~~using~~The ~~the~~Company ~~straight-line~~considers ~~method~~highly ~~over~~liquid ~~the~~money ~~estimated~~market ~~useful~~investments ~~lives~~with original maturities of ~~the~~three ~~assets,~~months ~~generally~~or ~~ranging~~less ~~from~~at ~~five~~the date of purchase to ~~seven~~be ~~years~~cash equivalents. ~~Leasehold~~The ~~improvements~~Company maintains ~~are~~its ~~amortized~~cash ~~using~~and ~~the straight~~cash equivalents with high-~~line~~credit ~~method~~quality ~~over~~financial ~~the~~institutions. ~~shorter~~At oftimes, ~~the~~such ~~estimated~~amounts ~~useful~~may ~~life~~exceed offederally ~~the~~insured ~~asset~~limits; orhowever, the ~~lease~~Company ~~term.~~has ~~Expenditures~~not ~~for~~experienced ~~repairs~~any losses in such accounts and ~~maintenance~~believes ~~are~~it ~~charged~~is not exposed to ~~operations~~any assignificant ~~incurred~~credit risk on its cash equivalent accounts.

~~Long-Lived~~Equipment, ~~Assets~~Furniture –and ~~The~~Leasehold ~~Company~~Improvements ~~reviews~~— ~~long-lived~~Equipment, ~~assets~~furniture and ~~whenever~~leasehold ~~events~~improvements orare ~~changes~~stated inat ~~circumstances~~cost ~~indicate~~less ~~that~~accumulated depreciation which is computed using the ~~carrying~~straight-line ~~amount~~method over the estimated useful lives of an ~~asset~~the ~~may~~assets, ~~not~~generally beranging ~~recoverable.~~from ~~Any~~five ~~long-lived~~to ~~assets~~seven ~~held~~years. ~~for~~Leasehold ~~disposal~~improvements are amortized ~~reported~~using atthe straight-line method over the ~~lower~~shorter of ~~their~~the ~~carrying~~estimated ~~amounts~~useful life of the asset or ~~fair~~the ~~value~~lease ~~less~~term. ~~costs~~Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to ~~sell~~operations as incurred.

~~Fair~~Deferred ~~Values,~~Financing ~~Inputs~~Costs ~~and~~- ~~Valuation~~Debt ~~Techniques~~issuance ~~for~~costs ~~Financial~~incurred ~~Assets~~in ~~and~~connection ~~Liabilities~~with ~~Disclosures~~the –issuance ~~The~~of ~~fair~~long-term ~~value~~debt ~~measurements~~(see ~~and~~Note ~~disclosure guidance~~9) ~~defines~~are ~~fair~~capitalized ~~value~~ and amortized ~~establishes~~to ainterest ~~framework~~expense ~~for~~over ~~measuring~~the ~~fair~~life ~~value.~~of ~~Fair~~the ~~value~~related isdebt ~~defined~~agreements asusing the ~~price~~straight-line ~~that~~method, ~~would~~which beapproximates ~~received~~the toeffective ~~sell~~interest anmethod. ~~asset~~For orthe ~~paid~~years toended ~~transfer~~September 30, a2014 ~~liability~~and in2013, aninterest ~~orderly~~expense ~~transaction~~totaling ~~between~~$8,000 ~~market participants at the~~and ~~measurement~~$0, ~~date. In accordance with this guidance~~respectively, ~~the~~was ~~Company~~related ~~has~~to ~~categorized~~amortization ~~its~~of ~~recurring~~deferred ~~basis~~financing ~~financial~~costs. ~~assets~~The ~~and~~unamortized ~~liabilities~~amounts ~~into~~are aincluded ~~three-level~~in ~~fair~~current ~~value~~and ~~hierarchy~~other ~~based~~assets onin the ~~priority~~accompanying ofconsolidated ~~the~~balance ~~inputs to the valuation technique~~sheets.

Long-Lived Assets - The Company reviews long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Any long-lived assets held for disposal are reported at the lower of their carrying amounts or fair value less costs to sell.

Goodwill - We review goodwill for possible impairment or loss of value at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when circumstances indicate that a reporting unit’s carrying amount is greater than its fair value. At September 30, 2014, we performed a goodwill impairment evaluation. We performed qualitative assessment of factors to determine whether it was necessary to perform the goodwill impairment test. Based on the results of our analysis, we concluded an impairment test was required. Based on the results of our impairment test, we have concluded that an impairment loss was not warranted at September 30, 2014.

Derivative Liabilities - The Company accounts for the convertible notes payable in accordance with ASC 815 which defines determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is solely indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under ASC 815 the Company is required to (1) evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions. The derivative liabilities are remeasured at fair value at the end of each reporting period as long as they are outstanding.

Fair Values, Inputs and Valuation Techniques for Financial Assets and Liabilities Disclosures -The fair value measurements and disclosure guidance defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In accordance with this guidance, the Company has categorized its recurring basis financial assets and liabilities into a three-level fair value hierarchy based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

•

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

•

Level 2 inputs utilize other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable in the marketplace for the asset. The observable inputs are used in valuation models to calculate the fair value for the asset.

•

Level 3 inputs are unobservable but are significant to the fair value measurement for the asset, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset. These inputs reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset.

AThe ~~review~~following ofsets ~~fair~~forth ~~value~~by ~~hierarchy~~level, ~~classifications~~within isthe ~~conducted~~fair onvalue ahierarchy, ~~quarterly~~the ~~basis.~~Company’s ~~Changes~~assets inand ~~the~~liabilities ~~observability~~measured ofat ~~valuation~~fair ~~inputs~~value ~~may~~in ~~result~~the inbalance asheet ~~reclassification~~as of ~~levels~~September 30, ~~for~~2014: ~~certain securities within the fair value hierarchy.~~

~~Disclosures~~Level ~~for~~1 ~~Non-Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis –~~ The Company’s ~~also~~cash ~~measures~~and ~~the~~cash ~~fair~~equivalents ~~value~~are ofmeasured ~~certain assets~~using onlevel a1 ~~non-recurring basis, generally on an annual basis, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable~~inputs. ~~These assets include long lived assets, and finite-lived intangible assets.~~

Level 2 The Company’s ~~utilized~~embedded ~~the~~derivative ~~income~~liabilities and ~~cost~~warrant ~~valuation~~liabilities ~~approach~~are tomeasured ~~determine~~on ~~the fair value used in its impairment analysis with an undiscounted cash flow model and~~ a ~~replacement~~recurring ~~cost~~basis ~~model.~~using ~~The Company has determined the inputs used in such analysis as~~ Level 32 inputs. During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company determined that the fair value of its long lived assets and finite-lived assets exceeded their carrying values. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any impairment charges during the year ended September 30, 2013.

~~Fair~~Level ~~Value~~3 ~~Of Financial Instruments –~~ The Company’s ~~principal~~Goodwill ~~financial~~impairment ~~instruments~~analysis ~~represented~~was by cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The fair value of the notes payable is estimated based principally on ~~current~~measurements ~~rates~~using ~~offered~~Level to3 ~~the Company for similar debt of the same remaining maturities~~inputs.

Accounts Receivable – The Company provides for the possibility of customers’ inability to make required payments by recording an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company writes-off an account when it is considered to be uncollectible. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable on an on-going basis. In some circumstances the Company records a specific allowance against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. For all other customers, the Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and the Company’s historical experience. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company allows its customers to return damaged or defective products following a customary return merchandise authorization process. The Company utilizes actual historical return rates to determine its allowance for returns each period. Gross sales are reduced by estimated returns and cost of goods sold is reduced by the estimated cost of those sales. The Company records a corresponding allowance for the estimated liability associated with the estimated returns. This estimated liability is based on the gross margin of the products corresponding to the estimated returns. This allowance is offset each period by the actual product returns. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company determined that no allowance for sales returns was necessary.

Concentrations of Credit Risk – The Company provides credit to its customers in the normal course of business. During the year ended September 30, 2013, one customer accounted for 88% of total product sales. The Company had no accounts receivable due from this customer at September 30, 2013. During the year ended September 30, 2012, one customer accounted for 83% of total product sales. This customer represented 62% of accounts receivable at September 30, 2012. The Company does not obtain collateral with which to secure its accounts receivable. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains reserves for potential credit losses based upon the Company’s historical experience related to credit losses and any unusual circumstances that may affect the ability of its customers to meet their obligations.

Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using weighted average cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventories on hand are evaluated on an on-going basis to determine if any items are obsolete or in excess of future needs. Items determined to be obsolete are reserved for. As of September 30, 2013 the Company determined that a reserve of $115,000 was required. As of September 30, 2012 the Company determined that a reserve of $90,000 was required.

Revenue Recognition – The Company recognizes revenue net of discounts upon shipment and transfer of title and when it has evidence that payment arrangements exist and the price to the buyer is fixed through signed contracts or purchase orders. Collectability is reasonably assured through one or more of the following: government purchase, historical payment practices or review of new customer credit. Customers do not have the right to return product unless it is damaged or defective.

Advertising Costs – Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 there were no expenditures for advertising.

Cost of Goods Sold – Cost of goods sold includes raw materials and components, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Also included are the costs related to outside production of product through an exclusive manufacturing agreement.

Income Taxes – Income taxes are provided for the effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related to differences between the basis of certain assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current depending on the classification of the assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that all, or some portion of, such deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company made a comprehensive review of its portfolio of uncertain tax positions in accordance with recognition standards established for certain tax positions. In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents the Company’s expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. At the date of adoption, and as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company does not have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company concluded that there are no uncertain tax positions. There was no cumulative effect on retained earnings.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share – Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect, if any, from the potential exercise of stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method.

The ~~weighted~~Company’s ~~average~~embedded ~~shares~~derivative ~~outstanding~~liabilities ~~used~~are inre-measured ~~the~~to ~~calculations~~fair value as of ~~net~~each ~~(loss)~~reporting ~~per~~date ~~share~~until the ~~were~~notes asare ~~follows:~~converted or paid off. See Note 9 below for more information about these liabilities and the inputs used for calculating fair value.

	For the years endedSeptember 30,
	2013		2012
Shares outstanding, beginning		24,976,000		24,976,000
Weighted average shares issued (purchased)		—		—
Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic and diluted		24,976,000		24,976,000

A review of fair value hierarchy classifications is conducted on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy.

~~Potential~~Disclosures ~~common~~for ~~shares~~Non-Financial ~~not~~Assets ~~included~~Measured inat Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis –The Company also measures the ~~calculation~~fair value of ~~net~~certain assets ~~(loss)~~on ~~per~~a ~~share~~non-recurring basis, asgenerally ~~their~~on ~~effect~~an ~~would~~annual basis, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be ~~anti~~recoverable. These assets include long lived assets and finite-~~dilutive,~~lived ~~are~~intangible asassets ~~follows:~~and goodwill impairment judgments.

	September 30,
	2013		2012
Stock options and warrants		8,504,000		5,629,000

The Company utilized the income and cost valuation approach to determine the fair value used in its impairment analysis with an undiscounted cash flow model and a replacement cost model. The Company has determined the inputs used in such analysis as Level 3 inputs. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company determined that the fair value of its long lived assets and finite-lived assets exceeded their carrying values. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any impairment charges during the year ended September 30, 2014.

~~Research~~Fair ~~and~~Value ~~Development~~Of –Financial ~~Research~~Instruments ~~and~~— ~~development~~The ~~costs~~Company’s ~~are~~principal ~~expensed~~financial asinstruments ~~incurred.~~represented ~~Substantially~~by ~~all~~cash and equivalents, accounts ~~research~~receivable and ~~development~~accounts ~~expenses~~payable, ~~are~~approximate ~~related~~their fair value due to ~~new~~the ~~product~~short-term ~~development~~nature ~~and~~of ~~designing~~these ~~improvements~~items. inThe carrying mounts reported for debt obligations approximate fair value due to the effective interest rate of these obligations reflecting the Company’s current ~~products~~borrowing rate.

Accounts Receivable – The Company provides for the possibility of customers’ inability to make required payments by recording an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company writes-off an account when it is considered to be uncollectible. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable on an on-going basis. In some circumstances the Company records a specific allowance against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. For all other customers, the Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and the Company’s historical experience. As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company allows its customers to return damaged or defective products following a customary return merchandise authorization process. The Company utilizes actual historical return rates to determine its allowance for returns each period. Gross sales are reduced by estimated returns and cost of goods sold is reduced by the estimated cost of those sales. The Company records a corresponding allowance for the estimated liability associated with the estimated returns. This estimated liability is based on the gross margin of the products corresponding to the estimated returns. This allowance is offset each period by the actual product returns. As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company determined that no allowance for sales returns was necessary.

Concentrations of Credit Risk - The Company provides credit to its customers in the normal course of business. During the year ended September 30, 2014, three customers accounted for 54%, 33% and 7%, respectively, of total product sales. One customer represented 98% of accounts receivable at September 30, 2014. During the year ended September 30, 2013, one customer accounted for 88% of total product sales. The Company had no accounts receivable due from this customer at September 30, 2013. The Company does not obtain collateral with which to secure its accounts receivable. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains reserves for potential credit losses based upon the Company’s historical experience related to credit losses and any unusual circumstances that may affect the ability of its customers to meet their obligations.

Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using weighted average cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventories on hand are evaluated on an on-going basis to determine if any items are obsolete or in excess of future needs. Items determined to be obsolete are reserved for. As of September 30, 2014 the Company determined that a reserve of $267,000 was required. As of September 30, 2013 the Company determined that a reserve of $185,000 was required.

Revenue Recognition - The Company recognizes revenue net of discounts upon shipment and transfer of title and when it has evidence that payment arrangements exist and the price to the buyer is fixed through signed contracts or purchase orders. Collectability is reasonably assured through one or more of the following: government purchase, historical payment practices or review of new customer credit. Customers do not have the right to return product unless it is damaged or defective.

Advertising Costs – Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 there were no expenditures for advertising.

Cost of Goods Sold - Cost of goods sold includes raw materials and components, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Also included are the costs related to outside production of product through an exclusive manufacturing agreement.

Income Taxes - Income taxes are provided for the effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related to differences between the basis of certain assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting, as well as net operating loss (NOL) and credit carryovers. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current depending on the classification of the assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that all, or some portion of, such deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company makes a comprehensive review of its portfolio of uncertain tax positions in accordance with recognition standards established for uncertain tax positions. In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents the Company’s expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. As of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the Company does not have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company concluded that there are no uncertain tax positions.

Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share includes the dilutive effect, if any, from the potential exercise of stock options and warrants and conversion of convertible debt using the treasury stock method.

The weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculations of net loss per share were as follows:


	For the years ended September 30,
	2014		2013
Shares outstanding, beginning		24,976,000		24,976,000
Weighted average shares issued (purchased)		—		—

Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic and fully-diluted		24,976,000		24,976,000

Potential common shares not included in the calculation of net loss per share, as their effect would be anti-dilutive, are as follows:


	September 30,
	2014		2013
Stock options and warrants		10,674,000		8,504,000
Convertible debt shares		14,014,000		—

		24,688,000		8,504,000

Research and Development - Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Substantially all research and development expenses are related to new product development and designing improvements in current products.

Stock Options – The Company measures the compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognizes the compensation expense over the service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is consistent with the Company’s valuation techniques previously utilized for stock options. Such fair value is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures.

Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Pronouncements

InThe ~~June~~Company ~~2011,~~reviews ~~the~~new ~~FASB issued amended~~ accounting ~~guidance~~standards onas ~~the presentation of comprehensive income~~issued. ~~The~~Although ~~amended~~some ~~guidance~~of ~~requires~~these ~~that~~accounting ~~all~~standards ~~non-owner~~issued ~~changes in~~are ~~stockholders’~~effective ~~equity~~after bethe ~~presented~~end ~~either in a single continuous statement~~ of ~~comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The provisions were effective for~~ the Company’s ~~financial~~previous ~~statements for the~~ fiscal year ~~beginning~~ ~~October 1,~~may ~~2012~~be ~~and~~applicable to the Company, ~~elected~~it tohas ~~present~~not ~~net~~identified ~~income~~any ~~and~~standards ~~other~~that ~~comprehensive~~it ~~income~~believes inmerit ~~two~~further ~~separate~~discussion. ~~but~~The ~~consecutive~~Company ~~statements.~~believes ~~The~~that ~~adoption~~none of the ~~amended~~new ~~guidance~~standards ~~did~~will ~~not~~ have a significant impact on ~~the Company’s~~its consolidated financial statements ~~and related disclosures~~.

In December 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to accounting guidance on the presentation of offsetting of derivatives, and financial assets and liabilities. The amended guidance requires quantitative disclosures regarding the gross amounts and their location within the statement of financial position. The provisions are effective for the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2013. The adoption of the amended guidance will not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures.

4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SOLD TO RELATED PARTY

The Company sells, without recourse, the receivables arising infor selected ~~accounts~~customers to a stockholder of the Company. For the year ended September 30, 2014 the aggregate amount of the receivables sold was $60,000. For the year ended September 30, 2013 the aggregate amount of the ~~receivable~~receivables sold was $878,000. Receivables are sold at a 2% discount, the purchaser receives all cash collections.

5. INVENTORIES

Inventories (net of reserves) were comprised of:

	September 30,2013			September 30,2012
	September 30,2014			September 30,2013
Raw materials	$	~~920~~961,000		$	1920,~~359,~~000
Work in process		8950,000			~~138~~89,000
Finished goods		~~625~~135,000			~~620~~625,000
Total Less: Current portion		1,~~634~~145,000 (1701,~~154,~~000	)		21,~~117~~634,000 (21,~~117~~154,000	)
Long-term portion	$	~~480~~444,000		$	—480,000

Because the sales of the Company’s SuperVision and Illuminator products have been less than expected, the Company has re-classified the inventories of these products to long-term and recorded the required discount at the applicable rate of 1318.4%.

6. FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consist of the following:

	EstimatedUseful Lives		September 30,~~2013~~2014			September 30,~~2012~~2013
Equipment and software		5	$	131,000		$	~~120~~131,000
Furniture and leasehold improvements		7		67,000			67,000
				198,000			~~187~~198,000
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization				(~~187~~193,000	)		(~~173~~187,000	)
			$	115,000		$	1411,000

Depreciation expense was $146,000 and $2014,000 for the years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~ 2013, respectively.

7. GOODWILL

The $375,000 recorded as goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the recorded minority interest of the Xenonics common stock repurchased. The Company issued 275,000 shares of common stock with a guaranteed market value of $375,000 as of December 10, 2009. ~~The~~In ~~Company~~accordance ~~does~~with ~~not~~current ~~amortize~~accounting guidance, goodwill. ~~Instead,~~is not amortized and is tested at least annually for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Company ~~evaluates~~performs ~~goodwill~~this ~~annually~~annual analysis in the fourth quarter ~~and~~of ~~whenever~~each ~~events~~fiscal oryear ~~changes~~and in ~~circumstances~~any ~~indicate~~other ~~that~~period itin iswhich ~~more~~indicators ~~likely~~of ~~than~~impairment ~~not~~warrant ~~that~~additional ananalysis. The ~~impairment~~goodwill analysis ~~loss~~is ~~has~~a ~~been~~two-step ~~incurred~~process. AsThe Company performed a qualitative assessment of ~~September 30,~~factors ~~2013,~~to determine whether it was necessary to perform the ~~Company~~goodwill ~~determined~~impairment ~~that~~test. noBased ~~such~~on the results of our analysis, we concluded an impairment ~~indicators~~test ~~exist.~~was required.

8.29 ~~NOTES PAYABLE~~

On July 15, 2009 the Company borrowed $525,000 under the terms of promissory notes due July 15, 2012 with interest only payments due quarterly at an annual rate of 13%.

In connection with the notes payable transaction, the Company granted and issued 525,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.75 and valued the warrants at $250,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.68, the volatility was estimated at 104%, the life of the warrants was 4 years, the risk free rate was 2.06% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned for the warrants issued in conjunction with the notes payable was recorded as debt discount and was amortized over the three year life of the notes. Pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes, the exercise price for the warrants was adjusted to $0.65 in April 2010 when the Company issued warrants at that lower price in connection with a stock offering. The Company recorded a valuation adjustment in 2010 of $6,000 for this change in the exercise price. For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 the Company recorded amortization of $66,000 and $83,000, respectively.

On December 7, 2011 the Company and the holders of the promissory notes agreed to amend the due date to October 15, 2012. In conjunction with the amendment, the Company amended the warrants issued with the original notes to lower the exercise price from $0.65 per share to $0.40 per share. The Company evaluated these amendments under ASC 470-50, Debt-Modification and Extinguishment, and concluded that the amendments were not significant and were therefore treated as debt modification. As a result, the Company recognized additional compensation expense of $5,000 for the year ended September 30, 2012.

On Management ~~March 19,~~performed ~~2012~~an impairment test by calculating the ~~Company~~fair ~~agreed~~value ~~(1) to~~of ~~reduce~~the reporting unit and comparing this calculated fair value with the ~~exercise~~carrying ~~price~~value of ~~warrants~~the toreporting unit. Included in ~~purchase~~this aevaluation ~~total~~are certain assumptions and estimates to determine the fair values of ~~525,000~~reporting ~~shares~~units such as estimates of ~~the~~future ~~Company’s~~cash ~~common~~flows ~~stock~~and ~~from~~discount ~~$0.40~~rates, as well as assumptions and estimates related to $0the valuation of other identified intangible assets.~~285~~ ~~per~~Changes ~~share~~in these assumptions and ~~(2) to~~estimates ~~extend~~or significant changes to the ~~expiration~~market ~~date~~value of ~~those~~our ~~warrants~~common ~~from~~stock ~~July 15,~~could ~~2014~~materially toimpact ~~July 15,~~our ~~2017~~results of operations or financial position. As aof ~~result~~September 30, 2014, the ~~Company recognized~~quantitative ~~additional~~evaluation ~~compensation~~of ~~expense~~the ofgoodwill ~~$26,000~~in ~~for~~accordance with ASC 350 indicated that the ~~year~~fair ~~ended~~value ~~September 30~~was more than its carrying amount, ~~2012~~including goodwill, and thus no goodwill impairment was triggered.

~~On March 19, 2012 the Company borrowed $500,000 under the terms of a promissory note~~8. ~~Repayment~~NOTES ofPAYABLE the promissory note is secured by a first lien security interest in all of the Company’s assets and is due no later than December 31, 2012, subject to earlier repayment upon the Company’s receipt of purchase orders. A total of $50,000 of interest must be paid on the loan

On ~~May~~July 2215, ~~2012~~2009 the Company borrowed $~~500~~525,000 under the terms of a promissory ~~note.~~notes ~~Repayment of the promissory note is~~ due ~~no later than December~~July 3115, 2012, ~~subject~~with tointerest only ~~earlier~~payments ~~repayment~~due ~~upon~~quarterly ~~the~~at ~~Company’s~~an ~~receipt~~annual rate of ~~purchase orders~~13%. AThe ~~total~~Company ofhas ~~$50,000~~modified ofthese ~~interest~~notes ~~was prepaid~~several ontimes ~~the~~since ~~loan~~issuance and ~~will~~has beproperly ~~amortized~~evaluated ~~over~~and ~~the~~accounted ~~term~~for ofeach ~~the loan~~modification.

On October 15, 2012 the Company and the holders of the promissory notes for $525,000 agreed to amend the due date to October 15, 2013. In conjunction with the amendment, the Company granted and issued 525,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.285 and valued the warrants at $94,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.23, the volatility was estimated at 114%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 0.67% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned for the warrants issued in conjunction with the amendment of the notes payable will be amortized over the one year extended life of the notes. The Company evaluated the amendment under ASC 470, “Debt— - Modification and Extinguishment,” and concluded that the extension and additional warrants resulted in significant and consequential changes to the economic substance of the debt and thus resulted in an extinguishment of the debt.

On December 20, 2012 the Company and the holders of the two promissory notes oftotalling $500,000 agreed to amend the due date to January 15, 2013. The Company evaluated the amendment under ASC 470-50, Debt-Modification and Extinguishment, and concluded that the amendment was not significant and were therefore treated as debt modification.

On December 20, 2012 the Company borrowed $75,000 under the terms of promissory notes with interest at an annual rate of 13%. Repayment of the promissory notes is secured by a first lien security interest in all of the Company’s assets and are due no later than January 15, 2013.

On January 23, 2013, the Company entered into an Agreement dated as of January 22, 2013 and closed the transactions contemplated by the Agreement. Pursuant to the Agreement:

•

The maturity date of the two $500,000 loans to the Company, and secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, was extended from January 15, 2013 to October 31, 2013 and the interest rate on each loan was increased to 13% per annum. In conjunction with the amendment, the Company granted and issued 400,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 and valued the warrants at $49,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.15, the volatility was estimated at 137%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 0.76% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned for the warrants issued in conjunction with the amendment of the notes payable will be amortized over the one year extended life of the notes. The Company evaluated the amendment under ASC 470-50, Debt-Modification and Extinguishment, and concluded that the amendment was not significant and was therefore treated as debt modification;

•

The Company repaid in full the $75,000 promissory notes, and

• The Company borrowed additional funds in the aggregate principal amount of $450,000, for which repayment is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, and bears interest at the rate of 13% per annum, and are repayable in full on October 31, 2013. In connection with the notes payable transaction, the Company granted and issued 450,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 and valued the warrants at $55,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.15, the volatility was estimated at 137%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 0.76% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned to the warrants issued in conjunction with the notes payable was recorded as debt discount and is being amortized over the nine-month life of the notes.

2930

the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.15, the volatility was estimated at 137%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 0.76% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned to the warrants issued in conjunction with the notes payable was recorded as debt discount and is being amortized over the nine-month life of the notes.

On October 31, 2013, the due dates for the principal balances for all of these loans were extended to December 15, 2013 pursuant to an agreement between the Company and the holders of the promissory notes.

On December 10, 2013 the Company and the holders of the unsecured promissory notes for $525,000 agreed to amend the due date to October 15, 2014. In conjunction with the amendment, the Company granted and issued 262,500 warrants with an exercise price of $0.12 and valued the warrants at $18,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.08, the volatility was estimated at 139%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 1.51% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned for the warrants issued in conjunction with the amendment of the notes payable will be amortized over the one year extended life of the notes. The Company evaluated amendment under ASC 470, “Debt— - Modification and Extinguishment,” and concluded that the extension and additional warrants resulted in significant and consequential changes to the economic substance of the debt and thus resulted in an extinguishment of the debt.

On December 10, 2013, the Company and the holders of the secured promissory notes for $1,450,000 agreed to amend the due dates for the principal balances for these loans were to October 15, 2014 pursuant to an agreement between the Company and the holders of the promissory notes. In conjunction with the agreement, the Company modified the term and the exercise price of existing warrants held by all of the holders of these promissory notes and granted and issued 725,000 new warrants with an exercise price of $0.12 and valued the warrants at $50,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.08, the volatility was estimated at 139%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 151% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned for the warrants issued in conjunction with the amendment of the notes payable will be amortized over the one year extended life of the notes. The Company evaluated the amendment under ASC 470-50, Debt-Modification and Extinguishment, and concluded that the amendment was not significant and was therefore treated as debt modification.

On December 10, 2013 the Company borrowed $200,000 under the terms of promissory notes with interest at an annual rate of 18%. Repayment of the promissory notes is secured by a first lien security interest in all of the Company’s assets and are due no later than January 31, 2014. The note holders also expect the Company will raise an additional $200,000 from other investors in January 2014. The note holders of the additional $200,000 loans will extend the due dates for these new loans to October 15, ~~2013~~2014 if the Company closes the new $200,000 debt financing by January 31, 2014 and agrees to a prepayment schedule based the Company’s cash flow.

30On January 24, 2014 the Company borrowed $125,000 under the terms of an assignment of purchase order with an interest at the rate of 2% per month. Repayment is due upon customer payment. On March 13, 2014 the Company borrowed $126,000 under the terms of an assignment of purchase order with an interest at the rate of 2% per month. Repayment is due upon customer payment. Both of these loans were repaid in May 2014.

On April 7, 2014 the Company borrowed $50,000 under the terms of a promissory note with interest at an annual rate of 10% and is due no later than October 15, 2014. In conjunction with this loan, the Company granted and issued 250,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.12 and valued the warrants at $19,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.08, the volatility was estimated at 173%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 1.68% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned to the warrants issued will be recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the life of the note.

On April 18, 2014 the Company borrowed $25,000 under the terms of a promissory note with interest at an annual rate of 18% and is due no later than October 15, 2014.

On April 21, 2014 the Company borrowed $25,000 under the terms of a promissory note with interest at an annual rate of 18% and is due no later than October 15, 2014.

Notes Payable	September 30,2013		September 30,2012
Secured note payable maturing on December 15, 2014 bearing interest of $50,000	$	—	$	500,000
Purchase order note payable maturing on December 15, 2014 bearing interest of $50,000		—		500,000
Total short-term debt obligations	$	—	$	1,000,000
Secured note payable maturing on December 15, 2014 bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $3,000	$	497,000		—
Secured note payable maturing on December 15, 2014 bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $5,000		445,000		—
Secured note payable maturing on December 15, 2014 bearing Interest at 13%, net of debt discounts of $3,000		497,000		—
Unsecured notes payable, maturing on December 15, 2014 bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $2,000		523,000		525,000
Total long-term obligations	$	1,962,000	$	525,000

On November 13, 2014, the due dates for the principal balances for all of these loans were extended to June 23, 2017 pursuant to an agreement between the Company and the holders of the promissory notes and all notes became secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company.

Future payments under long-term obligations as of September 30, 2013 are as follows:


Notes Payable	September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013
Secured note payable maturing on June 23, 2017 bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $-0- and $5,000 as of September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively	$	450,000	$	445,000
Secured note payable maturing on June 23, 2017 bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $-0- and $3,000 as of September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively		500,000		497,000
Secured note payable maturing on June 23, 2017 bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $-0- and $3,000 as of September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively		500,000		497,000
Secured note payable maturing on June 23, 2017, bearing interest at 18% per annum, net of debt discount of $2,000 at September 30, 2014		198,000		—
Secured note payable, maturing on June 23, 2017, bearing interest at 10% per annum, net of debt discount of $2,000 at September 30, 2014		48,000		—
Secured notes payable, maturing on June 23, 2017, bearing interest at 18% per annum		50,000		—
Secured notes payable, maturing on June 23, 2017, bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $-0- and $2,000 as of September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively		525,000		523,000

Total long-term notes payable	$	2,271,000	$	1,962,000

2015		$	1,975,000
Total		$	1,975,000

Future payments under long-term notes payable as of September 30, 2014 are as follows:

9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)


2017	$	2,275,000

Total	$	2,275,000

9. SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

XNNH Secured Convertible Notes Payable

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued and sold secured convertible notes of the Company in an aggregate principal amount of $638,000. The convertible promissory notes bear interest at a rate of 13% per annum and are convertible at the option of the holder into common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.07 per share. Management evaluated the embedded conversion option in light of the guidance in ASC 815: Derivatives and Hedging, and noted that the conversion option did not require bifurcation and derivative accounting. Management further evaluated the conversion option in light of the guidance in ASC 470: Debt, and determined that a beneficial conversion feature existed and required measurement and recognition. Management valued the beneficial conversion feature at $595,000 based on the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature capped at total proceeds related to the instrument. The beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a debt discount (with a corresponding credit to Additional Paid in Capital) and such discount is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the life of the note. As of September 30, 2014, $573,000 of the note discount remains unamortized. The notes are due three years from issuance and expire through September 9, 2017.

Private Placement Secured Convertible Notes Payable

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued and sold secured convertible notes of the Company in an aggregate principal amount of $343,000 through a private placement offering pursuant to a Subscription Agreement. The notes bear interest at 13% per annum and are convertible at the option of the holder thereof into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.07 per share. Additionally, the Company paid commissions of $56,000 and issued to the Placement Agent five-year warrants to purchase 922,902 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.12 per share.

The Company accounted for the Warrants relating to the aforementioned Private Placement in accordance with ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging. Because the Warrants are not indexed to the Company’s stock and are not classified in stockholders’ equity, they are recorded as liabilities at fair value. They are marked to market for each reporting period through the consolidated statement of operations. On the closing date, the derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value of $109,000. The value of the derivative liability as of September 30, 2014 was $151 ,000. As of result of a change in the estimated fair market value of the derivative liability we recorded other expense of $42,000 for the year ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Such change in the estimated fair value was primarily due to the fluctuation in the Company’s common stock price.

The Company accounted for the Convertible Notes relating to the aforementioned Private Placement in accordance with ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging. Because the embedded conversion feature in the notes is not indexed to the Company’s stock and is not classified in stockholders’ equity, they are bifurcated and recorded as liabilities at fair value. They are marked to market each reporting period through the consolidated statement of operations. On the closing date, the derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value of $547,000. The value of the derivative liability as of September 30, 2014 was $753,000. As of result of a change in the estimated fair market value of the derivative liability we recorded other expense of $206,000 for the year ended September 30, 2014. Such change in the estimated fair value was primarily due to the fluctuation in the Company’s common stock price.

The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Monte Carlo simulation based on the following assumptions: Hazard rate: 31.42%; Volatility: 132% - 133%; Risk free rate: 0.961% - 1.043%.


Secured Convertible Notes Payable	September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013
XNNH Secured Convertible Notes Payable, maturing through September, 2017, bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $573,000	$	65,000	$	—
Private Placement Secured Convertible Notes Payable, maturing through September, 2017, bearing interest at 13% per annum, net of debt discount of $334,000		9,000		—

Total secured convertible notes payable	$	74,000	$	—

Future payments under secured convertible notes payable as of September 30, 2014 are as follows:


2017	$	981,000

Total	$	981,000

10. SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

The Company has two classes of stock. There is no cumulative voting by shareholders and no preemptive rights. Each shareholder is entitled to have one vote for each share of stock held.

On October 10, 2009 the Company issued 300,000 shares of unregistered common stock to an independent firm for investor relations, financial public relations and marketing services for a period of three years11. ~~The~~STOCK ~~total~~OPTIONS ~~value~~AND ofWARRANTS the common stock issued was $240,000, of which $80,000 was recorded in Other current assets and $142,000 was recorded in Other assets. On April 28, 2010 the Company issued 300,000 shares to the same independent firm for an additional year for investor relations, financial public relations and marketing services. The total value of the common stock issued was $147,000, of which $43,000 was recorded in Other current assets and $104,000 was recorded in Other assets. For the year ended September 30, 2012 $199,000 was recorded as selling, general and administrative expense, which fully-amortized the costs of these transactions. Consequently, for the year ended September 30, 2013 there were no charges recorded for these transactions.

~~10.~~Stock ~~STOCK~~Options ~~OPTIONS~~- ~~AND~~The ~~WARRANTS~~Company accounts for all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, based on their fair values and classifies all stock-based compensation as selling, general and administrative expenses.

Stock Options – The Company accounts for all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, based on their fair values and classifies all stock-based compensation as selling, general and administrative expenses.

In July 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a stock option plan. Under the 2003 Option Plan, options to purchase up to 1,500,000 new shares of common stock are available for issuance to employees, directors, and outside consultants. Each option is exercisable as set forth in the documents evidencing the option, however, no option shall have a term in excess of ten years from the grant date. Options outstanding under the 2003 Option Plan have vesting periods ranging from immediate to ten years.

In December 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a 2004 stock option plan. The Company may issue up to 1,500,000 new shares of common stock under the 2004 plan and no person may be granted awards during any twelve-month period that cover more than 300,000 shares of common stock. Each option is exercisable as set forth in the documents evidencing the option, however, no option shall have a term in excess of ten years from the grant date. Options outstanding under the 2004 stock option plan have vesting periods ranging from immediate to five years.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for both plans as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, and changes during the years then ended is presented below:

	StockOptions			WeightedAverageExercise Price		WeightedAverageContractualTerm inYears		* AggregateIntrinsic Value
Outstanding at October 1, 2011		805,000		$	0.73		2.30		—
Outstanding at October 1, 2012		805,000		$	0.73		2.30		—
Granted		—			—
Forfeited		—			—
Cancelled		—			—
Outstanding at September 30, 2012		805,000		$	0.73		2.30		—
Granted		2,305,000		$	0.18		4.39
Forfeited		—			—
Cancelled		(805,000	)	$	$0.730.73
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		2,305,000		$	0.18		4.39		—
Exercisable at September 30, 2013		—			—		—		—
Granted		85,000		$	0.18		4.97
Forfeited		(75,000	)	$	0.18
Cancelled		—			—
Outstanding at September 30, 2014		2,315,000		$	0.18		3.44	$	69,000
Exercisable at September 30, 2014		—			—		—		—

* The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The market value of our stock was $0.1321 at September 30, ~~2013~~2014.

On February 18, 2013 vested stock options for 805,000 shares were canceled and replaced by grants of 2,305,000 performance options, all of which were subject to a requirement that the Company reports Income from Operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, not including the non-cash charge for these options. The unrecognized compensation cost related to these non-vested performance-based compensation arrangements using the Black-Scholes valuation model was $336,000. Because the Company would not report Income from Operations for the year ended September 30, 2013, on September 26, 2013 these performance options were extended under the same price, terms and conditions, subject to a requirement that the Company reports Income from Operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, not including non-cash charges for the options. In conjunction with this option modification, the unrecognized compensation using the ~~Black-Scholes valuation model and considering the current volatility, risk free rates and the stock prices the potential compensation cost of these options was reduced by $233,000 to $103,000.~~

~~All~~34 ~~outstanding stock options as of September 30, 2013 were not vested. All outstanding stock options as of September 30, 2012 were vested.~~

There was no compensation expense related to outstanding stock options for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

~~The~~ Black-Scholes ~~following~~valuation ~~table~~model ~~summarizes~~and ~~information~~considering ~~concerning~~the ~~currently~~current ~~outstanding~~volatility, risk free rates and ~~exercisable~~the stock prices the potential compensation cost of these options aswas reduced by $233,000 to $103,000. Because the Company would not report Income from Operations for the year ended September 30, 2014, on September 26, 2014 2,230 000 of these performance options were extended under the same price, terms and conditions, subject to a requirement that the Company reports Income from Operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2013:~~2015, not including non-cash charges for the options. In conjunction with this option modification, the unrecognized compensation using the Black-Scholes valuation model and considering the current volatility, risk free rates and the stock prices the potential compensation cost of these options was increased by $303,000 to $422,000. On September 26, 2014 85,000 new performance stock options were granted, all of which were subject to a requirement that the Company reports Income from Operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, not including the non-cash charge for these options. The unrecognized compensation cost related to these non-vested performance-based options, using the Black-Scholes valuation model and considering the current volatility, risk free rates and the stock prices was $16,000.

			Options OutstandingAt September 30, 2013				Options ExercisableAt September 30, 2013
Exercise Price	NumberOutstanding		WeightedAverageRemainingContractualLife (Years)		Weighted-AverageExercisePrice		NumberVested andExercisable		Weighted-AverageExercisePrice
$0.18		2,305,000		4.39	$	0.18		—		—
		2,305,000		4.39	$	0.18		—		—

All outstanding stock options as of September 30, 2014 and 2013 were not vested.

~~Stock~~There ~~Warrants~~was –no ~~The~~compensation ~~Company,~~expense ~~from~~related ~~time~~ to ~~time,~~outstanding ~~has issued common~~ stock ~~purchase~~options ~~warrants to~~for ~~employees, directors, shareholders and others. The warrants are nontransferable and are exercisable at any time after~~ the ~~date~~years ofended ~~issuance and on or before their respective expiration date~~September 30, ~~which~~2014 isand ~~generally five years~~2013.

The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable stock options as of September 30, 2014:


			Options Outstanding At September 30, 2014				Options Exercisable At September 30, 2014
Exercise Price	Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number Vested and Exercisable		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
$0.18		2,315,000		3.44	$	0.18		—		—

		2,315,000		3.44	$	0.18		—		—

Stock Warrants — The Company, from time to time, has issued common stock purchase warrants to employees, directors, shareholders and others. The warrants are nontransferable and are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance and on or before their respective expiration date, which is generally five years.

On July 15, 2009 the Company borrowed $525,000 under the terms of promissory notes due July 15, 2012 with interest only payments due quarterly at an annual rate of 13%. The Company also issued 525,000 five-year warrants at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. Pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes, the exercise price for the warrants was adjusted to $0.65 in April 2010 when the Company issued warrants at that lower price in connection with a stock offering. The Company recorded a valuation adjustment in 2010 of $6,000 for this change in the exercise price.

On March 19, 2012 the Company agreed (1) to reduce the exercise price of warrants to purchase a total of 525,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from $0.40 to $0.285 per share and (2) to extend the expiration date of those warrants from July 15, 2014 to July 15, 2017. The Company also agreed (1) to reduce the exercise price of warrants to purchase a total of 99,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from an average exercise price of $3.00 to $0.285 per share and (2) to extend the expiration date of those warrants from September 21, 2012 to September 21, 2017. On April 19, 2012 the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of warrants to purchase a total of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from $0.90 to $0.285 per share.

In conjunction with the warrant modifications on March 19, 2012, the Company recorded compensation expense of $27,000. In conjunction with the warrant modifications on April 19, 2012, the Company recorded compensation expense of $3,000.

On October 15, 2012 the Company and the holders of the promissory notes agreed to amend the due date to October 15, 2013. In conjunction with the amendment, the Company granted and issued 525,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.285 and valued the warrants at $94,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.23, the volatility was estimated at 114%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 0.67% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned for the warrants issued in conjunction with the amendment of the notes payable will be amortized over the one year extended life of the notes.

On December 10, 2013 the Company and the holders of the promissory notes agreed to amend the due date to October 15, 2014. In conjunction with the amendment, the Company ~~modified the term and the exercise price of all existing warrants (1,999,000) and~~ issued 987,500 new warrants with an exercise price of $0.12 and valued the warrants at $68,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: the market price was $0.08, the volatility was estimated at 139%, the life of the warrants was 5 years, the risk free rate was 1.51% and the dividend yield of 0%. The value assigned for the warrants issued in conjunction with the amendment of the notes payable will be amortized over the one year extended life of the notes.

33The Company analyzed all their warrants issued under ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity” and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” and concluded that they did not require liability accounting and qualified to be accounted for as equity in the accompanying financial statements, with the exception of the warrants issued as deferred financing costs as disclosed in Note 9.

The Company analyzed all their warrants issued under ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity” and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” and concluded that they did not require liability accounting and qualified to be accounted for as equity in the accompanying financial statements.

A summary of the Company’s warrant activity is as follows:

	For the years ended September 30,
	2013				2012
	2014				2013
	Warrants		WeightedAverageExercisePrice		Warrants			WeightedAverageExercisePrice
Outstanding-beginning of period		46,~~824~~199,000	$	0.5950		64,~~148~~824,000		$	10.1859
Issued		12,~~375~~160,000	$	0.2012		—1,375,000		$	—0.20
Exercised		—		—		—			—
Canceled/Forfeited		—		—		~~(1,324,000~~—	)	$	~~2.95~~—
Outstanding-end of period		68,~~199~~359,000	$	0.5038		46,~~824~~199,000		$	0.5950
Exercisable-end of period		68,~~199~~359,000	$	0.5038		46,~~824~~199,000		$	0.5950

Total ~~compensation~~ expense related to outstanding warrants for the years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~ 2013 was $~~198,000~~ -0- and $26198,000, respectively.

~~The~~36 ~~following table summarizes information concerning currently vested and exercisable warrants as of September 30, 2013:~~

	Warrants Vested and Exercisableat September 30, 2013
Range of Exercise Prices	NumberVested andExercisable		WeightedAverageRemainingContractualLife (Years)		Weighted-AverageExercisePrice
$0.14		850,000		4.31	$	0.14
$0.285		1,249,000		2.44	$	0.285
$0.50		100,000		1.11	$	0.50
$0.65		4,000,000		2.03	$	0.65
		6,199,000		2.41	$	0.50

11. INCOME TAXES

The Company made a comprehensive review of its portfolio of uncertain tax positions. In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents the Company’s expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this review, the Company concluded there are no uncertain tax positions. As a result, there was no cumulative effect on retained earnings.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple states and foreign jurisdictions. For all major taxing jurisdictions, the tax years 2008 through 2012 remain open for state and federal examination. As of September 30, 2013, the Company does not expect any material changes to unrecognized tax positions within the next twelve months.

The following table summarizes information concerning currently vested and exercisable warrants as of September 30, 2014:


	Warrants Vested and Exercisable at September 30, 2014
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Vested and Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
$0.12		4,159,000		4.38	$	0.12
$0.285		100,000		0.19	$	0.285
$0.50		100,000		0.11	$	0.50
$0.65		4,000,000		1.03	$	0.65

		8,359,000		2.68	$	0.38

12. INCOME TAXES

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple states and foreign jurisdictions. For all major taxing jurisdictions, the tax years 2009 through 2013 remain open for state and federal examination. As of September 30, 2014, the Company does not expect any material changes to unrecognized tax positions within the next twelve months.

The provision for income taxes is summarized below:

	For the years endedSeptember 30,
	2013			2012
	2014			2013
Current provision:
Federal	$	—		$	—
State		2,000			2,000
		2,000			2,000
Deferred provision:
Federal		(~~324~~882,000	)		(~~784~~324,000	)
State		(8583,000	)		(~~163~~85,000	)
		(409,000	)		(947,000	)
		(965,000	)		(409,000	)
Valuation allowance		~~409~~965,000			~~947~~409,000
	$	2,000		$	2,000

The principal components of deferred tax assets, liabilities and the valuation allowance are as follows:

	For the years endedSeptember 30,
	2013			2012
	2014			2013
Inventory reserve	$	46106,000		$	3646,000
Deferred lease liability		2833,000			1232,000
Stock compensation expense		~~915~~874,000			~~874~~915,000
Warrant expense		~~478~~513,000			~~399~~478,000
State taxes		1,000			1,000
Accumulated depreciation / amortization		109,000			1110,000
R&D credit		~~867~~866,000			~~865~~867,000
Other		80173,000			5676,000
Net operating loss carry-forwards		78,~~816~~631,000			7,~~578~~816,000
		10,241,000			9,832,000
		11,206,000			10 241,000
Valuation allowance		(1011,~~241~~206,000	)		(910,~~832~~241,000	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

As of September 30, ~~2013~~2014, the Company had federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards of $1922,~~876~~093,000 and $1819,~~140~~185,000, respectively, which begin to expire in 2018 for federal tax purposes and ~~2015~~2014 for state purposes. A valuation allowance of $(1011,~~241~~206,000) has been recorded to offset net deferred tax assets since the realization of these assets is uncertain. Some of these carry forward NOL’s may be subjected to limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Except to the extent of the valuation allowance that has been established, the Company believes these limitations will not prevent the carry forward benefits from being realized.

The reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective tax rate is as follows:

	For the years endedSeptember 30,
	2013			2012
	2014			2013
Federal statutory rate		34.0	%		34.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		5.8			5.8
Change in valuation allowance		(2637.52	)		(4326.25	)
R&D credit carry-forward		0.0			4.0
Permanent differences		(0.0	)		(0.1	)
Other		(132.57	)		(013.74	)
		(0.2	)%		(0.1	)%
		(0.1	)%		(0.2	)%

3513. SAVINGS PLAN

On July 1, 2004, the Company implemented a 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”) which covers all eligible employees. Participants may contribute no less than 1% and up to the maximum allowable under the Internal Revenue Service regulations. In addition, the Company may make discretionary contributions to the Savings Plan, subject to certain limitations. For the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company made no matching contributions.

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases - The Company moved into new facilities in January 2009, under the terms of a lease that was to expire in March 2014. In January 2013 the Company negotiated an amendment to the lease that will now expire in March 2019. The lease requires that the Company pay a pro-rata share of all operating expenses including, but not limited to, real estate taxes, common area maintenance and utilities. The Company also leases office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense under these leases totaled $215,000 and $218,000 for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Minimum future cash obligations for the new lease total $218,000, $225,000, $230,000, $235,000 and $120,000 for the years ending September 30, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Employment Agreements — Alan P. Magerman and Jeffrey P. Kennedy are our only employees who have employment agreements. Under their employment agreements, Mr. Magerman is to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Xenonics,

Inc., and Mr. Kennedy is to serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of Xenonics, Inc. Both employment agreements were entered into by Xenonics, Inc. as of January 1, 2003 and, except as set forth below, are substantially identical. Neither employment agreement has a fixed term or expiration date. Instead, Mr. Magerman’s agreement will continue until 24 months after either he or Xenonics, Inc. gives the other notice of termination. Likewise, Mr. Kennedy’s agreement will continue until 12 months after either he or Xenonics gives the other notice of termination. ~~SAVINGS~~On ~~PLAN~~December 15, 2010, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to both agreements to provide that either party can terminate the agreement with 30 days written notice, however, in the event of termination by Xenonics without cause, the benefits of the agreements will continue for 36 months after notice of termination. Both agreements provide for base compensation of $180,000 per year, to be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index. As of September 30, 2014 the base compensation for each of the two officers was $233,000. In addition, if either Mr. Magerman or Mr. Kennedy is terminated for any reason other than for cause, the agreements require that they must be paid the remaining balances due to them under the agreements as liquidated damages.

On July 1, 2004, the Company implemented a 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”) which covers all eligible employees. Participants may contribute no less than 1% and up to the maximum allowable under the Internal Revenue Service regulations. In addition, the Company may make discretionary contributions to the Savings Plan, subject to certain limitations. For the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company made no matching contributions.

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases – The Company moved into new facilities in January 2009, under the terms of a lease that was to expire in March 2014. In January 2013 the Company negotiated an amendment to the lease that will now expire in March 2019. The lease requires that the Company pay a pro-rata share of all operating expenses including, but not limited to, real estate taxes, common area maintenance and utilities. The Company also leases office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense under these leases totaled $218,000 and $216,000 for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Minimum future cash obligations for the new lease total $215,000, $218,000, $225,000, $230,000 and $235,000 for the years ending September 30, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.

Employment Agreements – Alan P. Magerman and Jeffrey P. Kennedy are our only employees who have employment agreements. Under their employment agreements, Mr. Magerman is to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Xenonics, Inc., and Mr. Kennedy is to serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of Xenonics, Inc. Both employment agreements were entered into by Xenonics, Inc. as of January 1, 2003 and, except as set forth below, are substantially identical. Neither employment agreement has a fixed term or expiration date. Instead, Mr. Magerman’s agreement will continue until 24 months after either he or Xenonics, Inc. gives the other notice of termination. Likewise, Mr. Kennedy’s agreement will continue until 12 months after either he or Xenonics gives the other notice of termination. On December 15, 2010, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to both agreements to provide that either party can terminate the agreement with 30 days written notice, however, in the event of termination by Xenonics without cause, the benefits of the agreements will continue for 36 months after notice of termination. Both agreements provide for base compensation of $180,000 per year, to be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index. As of September 30, 2013 the base compensation for each of the two officers was $233,000. In addition, if either Mr. Magerman or Mr. Kennedy is terminated for any reason other than for cause, the agreements require that they must be paid the remaining balances due to them under the agreements as liquidated damages.

The Company is occasionally subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. It is impossible to predict with any certainty the outcome of pending disputes, and the Company cannot predict whether any liability arising from pending claims and litigation will be material in relation to the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

1415. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated all activity through the date that the consolidated financial statements were issued and concluded that the only subsequent events that occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are the amendments to the outstanding notes payable ~~and new loans~~ described in Note 8 above.

3639

~~ITEM~~Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management conducted an evaluation, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness as of the end of the period covered by this annual report of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014, which is the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management isconducted ~~responsible~~an ~~for~~evaluation, ~~establishing~~with ~~and~~the ~~maintaining~~participation ~~adequate~~of ~~internal~~our ~~control~~Chief ~~over~~Executive ~~financial~~Officer and Chief ~~reporting~~Financial Officer, of the effectiveness as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(fe) and 15d-15(fe) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and ~~for~~reported within ~~assessing~~the time periods specified in the ~~effectiveness~~rules and forms of ~~internal~~the ~~control~~Securities ~~over~~and ~~financial~~Exchange ~~reporting~~Commission (the “SEC”) and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2014, which is the end of the period covered by this annual report.

~~Internal~~Based ~~control~~upon ~~over~~the ~~financial~~evaluation conducted ~~reporting~~by ismanagement ~~intended~~in toconnection ~~provide~~with ~~reasonable assurance regarding~~ the ~~reliability~~review of the Company’s financial ~~reporting~~statements ~~and~~for the ~~preparation~~year ofended ~~financial~~September 30, ~~statements~~2014, ~~for~~the ~~external~~Company ~~purposes~~identified a significant deficiency in ~~accordance~~our ~~with~~internal ~~accounting~~control ~~principles~~over ~~generally~~financial ~~accepted~~reporting. inA significant ~~the~~deficiency ~~United~~is ~~States~~a deficiency, or a combination of ~~America.~~deficiencies, ~~Internal~~in internal control over financial reporting ~~includes those policies and procedures~~ that ~~(i) pertain~~is toless ~~the~~severe ~~maintenance~~than ofa ~~records~~material ~~that~~weakness, inyet ~~reasonable~~important ~~detail,~~enough ~~accurately~~to ~~and~~merit ~~fairly~~the ~~reflect~~attention ~~the~~by ~~transactions~~those ~~and~~responsible ~~dispositions~~for ofoversight for the Company’s ~~assets,~~financial ~~(ii) provide~~reporting. ~~reasonable~~A ~~assurance~~material ~~that~~weakness ~~transactions~~is ~~are recorded~~a asdeficiency, ~~necessary~~or toa ~~permit~~combination ~~preparation~~ of ~~financial~~deficiencies, ~~statements~~ in ~~accordance~~internal ~~with~~control ~~accounting~~over ~~principles~~financial ~~generally~~reporting, ~~accepted~~such inthat ~~the~~there ~~United~~is ~~States~~a ofreasonable ~~America~~possibility ~~and~~ that ~~the~~a ~~Company’s~~material ~~receipts~~misstatement ~~and~~of ~~expenditures are being made only in accordance~~the ~~with~~Company’s ~~authorizations~~annual ofor ~~its~~interim ~~management~~financial ~~and~~statements ~~directors,~~will ~~and~~not ~~(iii) provide~~be ~~reasonable~~prevented ~~assurance~~or ~~regarding~~detected ~~prevention~~on ora timely ~~detection~~basis. ofThe ~~unauthorized~~significant ~~acquisitions,~~deficiency ~~use,~~in orinternal ~~disposition~~control ofover ~~the~~financial ~~Company’s~~reporting ~~assets~~ that ~~could~~was ~~have~~identified ais ~~material effect~~as onfollows: ~~its financial statements.~~

Management, ~~with~~did ~~the~~not ~~participation~~maintain ofsufficient ~~the~~personnel ~~Chief~~with ~~Executive~~an ~~Officer~~appropriate ~~and~~level ~~the~~of ~~Chief~~technical ~~Financial~~accounting ~~Officer~~knowledge, ~~conducted~~ anexperience ~~evaluation~~and oftraining in the application ~~effectiveness~~ of ~~the~~U.S. ~~Company’s~~GAAP ~~internal~~commensurate ~~control~~with ~~over~~our complexity and our financial accounting and reporting, asrequirements. ofWe ~~September 30,~~are ~~2013,~~committed ~~based~~to onimproving ~~criteria~~our ~~established~~accounting inand ~~Internal~~financial ~~Control—Integrated~~reporting ~~Framework~~functions. ~~issued~~We bywill ~~the~~continue ~~Committee~~to ~~of Sponsoring~~monitor ~~Organizations~~and ofevaluate the effectiveness ~~Treadway~~of ~~Commission~~our ~~(COSO).~~disclosure ~~Based~~controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on ~~that~~an ~~evaluation,~~ongoing ~~management~~basis ~~concluded~~and ~~that,~~are ascommitted ofto ~~September 30,~~taking ~~2013,~~further ~~the~~action ~~Company’s~~and ~~internal~~implementing ~~control~~additional ~~over~~improvements, ~~financial~~as ~~reporting~~necessary ~~was~~and ~~effective~~as funds allow.

~~Pursuant~~Based toupon ~~applicable~~our ~~law~~evaluation, ~~this~~we ~~annual~~also ~~report~~concluded isthat ~~not~~there ~~required~~was tono ~~include~~change anin ~~attestation~~our ~~report~~internal ofcontrol ~~the~~over ~~Company’s~~financial ~~registered~~reporting ~~public~~during our most recent ~~accounting~~fiscal ~~firm~~quarter ~~regarding~~that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal year that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

3740

Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Management of the Company, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Furthermore, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons or by the collusion of two or more persons. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

3841

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:

Name	Age		Position	~~Position~~
Alan P. Magerman	79	78	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer	~~Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer~~
Jeffrey P. Kennedy	60	59	Director, President and Chief Operating Officer	~~Director, President and Chief Operating Officer~~
Richard S. Kay	72	71	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer	~~Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer~~
Allen K. Fox	78	77	Director	~~Director~~
Brad J. Shapiro	59	58	Director	~~Director~~

Directors are elected at each annual meeting of shareholders, and each executive officer serves until his resignation, death, or removal by the Board of Directors.

Alan P. Magerman. Mr. Magerman, age 7879, founded Xenonics, Inc. in November 1996, and has been Chairman of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. since its acquisition of Xenonics, Inc. in July 2003. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. from July 2003 through April 2005 and has served as our Chief Executive Officer from February 2009 to the present. Prior to founding Xenonics, Mr. Magerman was a founder and former chairman of Odyssey Sports, Inc., a privately held company engaged in the development and distribution of golf clubs from 1990 through 1995. Mr. Magerman was a consultant and director of NTN Communications, Inc. (NTN), a publicly held broadcasting and cable television company, from 1984 through 1997.

Mr. Magerman’s diverse business experience provides him with a wide range of expertise that is valuable to the Board of Directors in confronting various business-related challenges and opportunities.

Jeffrey P. Kennedy. Mr. Kennedy, age 5960, has been a director and the President and Chief Operating Officer of Xenonics, Inc. since June 1997. Mr. Kennedy has held the same positions with Xenonics Holdings, Inc. since the acquisition of Xenonics, Inc. in July 2003. Prior to joining Xenonics, Inc., Mr. Kennedy held a variety of management positions with Mobil Corporation, including General Manager of the Mobil Chemical Plastics Division. He was educated at the University of Maine, receiving a BS degree in chemistry and an MS degree in chemical engineering.

As our President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Kennedy has extensive knowledge about the Company which provides a valuable resource for the Board of Directors in connection with its decisions about the operations and future direction of the Company.

Richard S. Kay. Mr. Kay, age 7172, joined Xenonics in May 2007 and has been the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Xenonics, Inc. since then. From February 2001 through October 2006 he held the position of Chief Executive Officer of Pacer Technology. Mr. Kay graduated from the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee with a BBA and majored in Accounting and Military Science. Early in his career he worked as a CPA in Wisconsin and California.

Allen K. Fox. Mr. Fox, age 7778, has been managing personal finances and providing consulting work for several public companies since 1995, and was elected as a director of the Company on July 1, 2010. Mr. Fox has also served as a director and/or officer for several charitable organizations during the last 40 years. He co-founded Odyssey Sports Co. in 1990 and was a director and an officer of that company. The company was sold in 1995. Mr. Fox also co-founded NYSE education company, Career Com, Corp. in 1969. He was a director and officer and sold his interest in 1989. From 1960 to 1969 he was a partner with an accounting firm. Mr. Fox graduated from Temple University in 1958.

~~Mr. Fox~~42 brings to the Board extensive experience in serving as an officer and a director of, and as a consultant to, numerous public and private companies. Mr. Fox’s experience as a partner of an accounting firm also assists the Board in addressing accounting requirements with which the Company must comply.

~~Brad J. Shapiro.~~ Mr. ~~Shapiro,~~Fox ~~age~~brings ~~58,~~to ~~has been a principal in various businesses in~~ the ~~optical~~Board ~~industry~~extensive ~~since~~experience ~~1990. He is currently a principal~~ in Cserving &as Ean ~~Vision~~officer ~~Services, Inc.,~~ and ~~Vision~~a ~~West,~~director ~~Inc.~~of, ~~which together comprise the largest optical group purchasing organizations in the United States. He is also principal, co-founder~~ and ~~co-Chief~~as ~~Executive~~a ~~Officer~~consultant ~~of Rudy Project North America, L.P., the exclusive North American distributor of Rudy Project sport eyewear. From 1989~~ to ~~1990~~, ~~Mr. Shapiro~~numerous ~~was~~public ~~a Managing Director of an investment-banking subsidiary of Cantor Fitzgerald~~ and ~~another~~private ~~investment banking firm~~companies. ~~For seven years prior to that time,~~ Mr. ~~Shapiro~~Fox’s ~~was~~experience as a ~~corporate~~partner ~~and~~of ~~securities lawyer at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom,~~ an ~~international~~accounting ~~law~~ firm, ~~and~~also ~~certain~~assists ~~other law firms. Mr. Shapiro has served as a director of~~ the ~~Company~~Board ~~since July 1, 2010. Mr. Shapiro holds a B.A.~~ in ~~Political~~addressing ~~Science~~accounting ~~from~~requirements ~~the~~with ~~University~~which ~~of Michigan and received his J.D. degree from~~ the ~~University~~Company ofmust ~~Michigan Law School in December 1990~~comply.

Brad J. Shapiro. Mr. Shapiro, age 59, has been a principal in various businesses in the optical industry since 1990. He is currently a principal in C & E Vision Services, Inc., and Vision West, Inc., which together comprise the largest optical group purchasing organizations in the United States. He is also principal, co-founder and co-Chief Executive Officer of Rudy Project North America, L.P., the exclusive North American distributor of Rudy Project sport eyewear. From 1989 to 1990, Mr. Shapiro was a Managing Director of an investment-banking subsidiary of Cantor Fitzgerald and another investment banking firm. For seven years prior to that time, Mr. Shapiro was a corporate and securities lawyer at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, an international law firm, and certain other law firms. Mr. Shapiro has served as a director of the Company since July 1, 2010. Mr. Shapiro holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Michigan and received his J.D. degree from the University of Michigan Law School in December 1990.

Mr. Shapiro brings to the Board a diversified business and legal background that is valuable in analyzing various business related challenges and opportunities.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller. You can obtain a copy of the Code, without charge, by writing to our Corporate Secretary at Xenonics Holdings, Inc., 3186 Lionshead Avenue, Suite 100, Carlsbad, California 92010. A copy of the Code is also available on our website at www.xenonics.com.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to:

•

The quality and integrity of our financial statements and reports;

•

The independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence; and

•

The performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee appoints the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approves permitted non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Fox and Shapiro, each of whom is “independent” under the independence standards of both the NYSE MKT and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Fox is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee’s Charter is on our website at www.xenonics.com.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is authorized to review and make recommendations to the full Board of Directors relating to the annual salaries and bonuses of our officers and to determine in its sole discretion all grants of stock options, the exercise price of each option, and the number of shares to be issuable upon the exercise of each option under our stock option plans. The Committee also is authorized to interpret our stock option plans, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the plans, to determine the term and provisions of the respective option agreements, and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the plans. The Compensation Committee’s Charter is on our website at www.xenonics.com. The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Fox and Shapiro.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee assists our Board of Directors in discharging its duties relating to corporate governance and the compensation and evaluation of the Board. The purpose of the Committee is to (1) identify individuals who are qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, (2) select, or recommend for the Board’s selection, the director nominees for each annual meeting of shareholders, (3) develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Xenonics, (4) oversee the annual evaluation of the Board and management, and (5) perform such other actions within the scope of the Committee’s Charter as the Committee deems necessary or advisable. A copy of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s Charter is available on our website at www.xenonics.com. The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Fox and Shapiro.

4043

individuals who are qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, (2) select, or recommend for the Board’s selection, the director nominees for each annual meeting of shareholders, (3) develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Xenonics, (4) oversee the annual evaluation of the Board and management, and (5) perform such other actions within the scope of the Committee’s Charter as the Committee deems necessary or advisable. A copy of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s Charter is available on our website at www.xenonics.com. The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Fox and Shapiro.

The Nominating and Governance Committee has not established any specific minimum qualifications for director candidates or any specific qualities or skills that a candidate must possess in order to be considered qualified to be nominated as a director. Qualifications for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the particular areas of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing Board composition. In making its nominations, our Nominating and Governance Committee generally will consider, among other things, an individual’s business experience, industry experience, financial background, breadth of knowledge about issues affecting our company, time available for meetings and consultation regarding company matters and other particular skills and experience possessed by the individual. Although the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that director nominees should add to the range of backgrounds and experiences of the Company’s directors, neither the Nominating and Governance Committee nor the Board of Directors has a policy regarding the consideration of diversity in identifying and evaluating director nominees.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock (collectively, “Reporting Persons”) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received or written representations from the Reporting Persons, we believe that, with respect to the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014, all of the Reporting Persons complied with all applicable Section 16 filing requirements on a timely basis.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation for the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and September 30, ~~2012~~2013 for services rendered to us (including our subsidiary, Xenonics, Inc.) by our Chief Executive Officer and our only other executive officer whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014:

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary($)			Bonus($)		StockAwards($)		OptionAwards($)		Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation($)		NonqualifiedDeferredCompensationEarnings($)		All OtherCompensation($)		Total($)
Alan P. Magerman
Chairman of the Board and		~~2013~~2014	$	~~249~~233,~~998~~215	(1)		—		—		—		—		—		—	$	~~249~~233,~~998~~215
Chief Executive Officer		~~2012~~2013	$	249,~~598~~998	(2)		—		—		—		—		—		—	$	249,~~598~~998
Jeffrey P. Kennedy
Chief Operating Officer,		~~2013~~2014	$	~~255~~245,~~335~~717	(3)		—		—		—		—		—		—	$	~~255~~245,~~335~~717
President and Director		~~2012~~2013	$	~~247~~255,~~746~~335	(4)		—		—		—		—		—		—	$	~~247~~255,~~746~~335

(1) Includes $~~18,628~~ -0- for vacation pay benefits paid for days accrued.

(2) Includes $2318,~~470~~628 for vacation pay benefits paid for days accrued.

~~(3)~~44 ~~Includes $23,965 for vacation pay benefits paid for days accrued.~~

(4) Includes $21,617 for vacation pay benefits paid for days accrued.

(3)	Includes $12,501 for vacation pay benefits paid for days accrued.

(4)	Includes $23,965 for vacation pay benefits paid for days accrued.

Compensation of the Board of Directors

When Allen K. Fox and Brad J. Shapiro became directors on July 1, 2010, the Company agreed to compensate all non-employee directors for their services. The Company agreed to pay each non-employee director $5,000 as an annual director’s fee, $500 for each committee meeting attended and not held in conjunction with a Board meeting, and $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended. ~~Due to continued losses, these fees were accrued in fiscal year 2013 but not paid.~~ The Company ~~had~~ also agreed to pay ~~Mr. Fox~~each anon-employee ~~fee~~director of $51,000 ~~per~~as ~~month~~an asannual ~~Chairman~~fee for being a member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Development ~~committee~~Committee., ~~For~~Due ~~fiscal~~to ~~year~~continued ~~2013~~losses, these ~~the~~fees ~~Company~~were ~~paid~~accrued ~~Mr. Fox~~in afiscal ~~total~~year of2014 ~~$50,000~~ but, innot ~~consideration~~paid. ofThe ~~the~~following ~~Company’s~~table ~~tight~~sets ~~cash~~forth ~~position,~~information ~~Mr. Fox~~concerning ~~requested~~the ~~that~~compensation wepaid noto ~~longer~~our ~~pay~~non-employee ordirectors ~~accrue~~during ~~these~~our ~~fees~~fiscal ~~and~~year ~~the~~ended ~~Company~~September 30, ~~ceased~~2014 ~~expensing~~for ~~the~~their ~~fees~~services rendered as directors.

~~The~~DIRECTOR ~~following~~COMPENSATION ~~table~~FOR ~~sets~~FISCAL ~~forth~~YEAR ~~information~~2014 ~~concerning the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during our fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 for their services rendered as directors.~~

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Allen K. Fox	$	8,000						—	$	8,000
Brad J. Shapiro	$	8,000							$	8,000

Name	FeesEarnedor Paidin Cash($)		StockAwards($)	OptionAwards($)	Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation($)	NonqualifiedDeferredCompensationEarnings($)	All OtherCompensation($)		Total($)
Allen K. Fox	$	50,000						—	$	50,000
Brad J. Shapiro		—								—

Stock Option Grants

The following table sets forth information as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 concerning unexercised options, unvested stock and equity incentive plan awards for each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2013~~2014

	Option Awards										Stock Awards
Name	GrantDate		Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions(#)Exercisable	Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions(#)Unexercisable	EquityIncentivePlanAwards:Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedUnearnedOptions (#)		OptionExercisePrice($)		OptionExpirationDate		~~NumberofSharesor~~Number ~~Unitsof~~ofShares ~~StockThatHaveNotVested~~orUnits ofStockThat HaveNotVested(#)	~~MarketValueofSharesorUnitsofStockThatHaveNotVested~~MarketValue ofShares orUnits ofStockThatHave NotVested($)	EquityIncentivePlanAwards:~~NumberofUnearnedShares~~Number ofUnearnedShares,Units ~~orOtherRightsThatHave~~orOtherRightsThat ~~NotVested~~HaveNotVested(#)	EquityIncentivePlanAwards:~~Marketor~~Market ~~PayoutValue~~orPayoutValue ofUnearnedShares,Units orOtherRightsThatHave NotVested($)
Alan P. Magerman		2-18-13				485,000	$	0.18		2-17-18
Chairman of the Board and		2-18-13				365,000	$	0.18		2-17-18
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer		2-18-13				365,000	$	0.18		2-17-18
Chief Executive Officer
		Total				850,000
Jeffrey P. Kennedy		2-18-13				400,000	$	0.18		2-17-18
Chief Operating Officer		2-18-13				375,000	$	0.18		2-17-18
President and Director
		Total				775,000

Employment Agreements

Alan P. Magerman and Jeffrey P. Kennedy are our only employees who have employment agreements. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Magerman is to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Xenonics, Inc., and Mr. Kennedy is to serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of Xenonics, Inc. Both employment agreements were entered into by Xenonics, Inc. as of January 1, 2003 and, as amended, are substantially identical. Neither employment agreement has a fixed term or expiration date. On December 15, 2010, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to each agreement to provide that either party can terminate the agreement with 30 days written notice. However, in the event of termination by Xenonics without cause, the former officer’s right to receive his base salary will continue for 36 months after the notice of termination. Both agreements provide for base compensation of $180,000 per year, to be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index. . As of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 the base compensation for each of the two officers was $233,000. In addition, if either Mr. Magerman or Mr. Kennedy is terminated for any reason other than for cause, the agreements require that they must be paid the remaining balances due to them under the agreements as liquidated damages.

4346

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 4, 2013 by (1) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than five percent of our outstanding common stock, (2) each of our current directors and director nominees, (3) the executive officers listed above in the Summary Compensation Table, and (4) all current executive officers and directors as a group. The number of shares and the percentage of shares beneficially owned by each such person or group, as set forth below, include shares of common stock that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within sixty days after December 4, 2013 pursuant to the exercise of vested and exercisable options or warrants or pursuant to the exercise of convertible debt. References to options or warrants in the footnotes to the table below include only options or warrants to purchase shares that were exercisable on or within sixty days after December 4, ~~2013~~2014.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount of CommonStock & Nature ofBeneficial Ownership(1)			Percent of Ownershipof Common Stock
Stephen D. Baksa 2 Woods Lane, Chatham, NJ 07928		1,533,564			6.1	%
Alan P. Magerman		975,044	(2)		3.8	%
Alan P. Magerman		260,758	(2)		1.0	%
Jeffrey P. Kennedy		1,195,886	(3)		4.7	%
Jeffrey P. Kennedy		481,600	(3)		1.9	%
Allen K. Fox		118,000	(4)		*
Brad J. Shapiro		519,245	(5)		2.1	%
All current executive officers and directors as a group (5 persons)		1,399,603	(6)		5.6	%
All current executive officers and directors as a group (4 persons)		2,808,174	(6)		10.7	%

*	Less than 1.0%

(1) The number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on December 4, ~~2013~~2014 was 24,975,929 shares.

(2) Does not include 850,000 shares that Alan P. Magerman, a director and officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., has the right to acquire pursuant to performance stock options that will vest if the Company has an operating profit for fiscal year ~~2014~~2015. Includes 714,286 shares that may be issued to Mr. Magerman pursuant to a conversion at $0.07 per share of his $50,000 investment in the Company’s secured convertible debt.

(3) Does not include 775,000 shares that Jeffrey P. Kennedy, a director and officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., has the right to acquire pursuant to performance stock options that will vest if the Company has an operating profit for fiscal year ~~2014~~2015. Includes 714,286 shares that may be issued to Mr. Kennedy pursuant to a conversion at $0.07 per share of his $50,000 investment in the Company’s secured convertible debt.

(4) Includes 18,000 shares owned by his wife but does not include 170,000 shares that Allen K. Fox, a director of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., has the right to acquire pursuant to performance stock options that will vest if the Company has an operating profit for fiscal year ~~2014~~2015.

(5) Includes the following shares with respect to which Brad J. Shapiro, a director of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., has shared voting and investment power: (i) 52,500 shares held by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Shapiro’s sister and for which Mr. Shapiro serves as a trustee; (ii) 369,245 shares held by three trusts for the benefit of Mr. Shapiro’s mother and for which Mr. Shapiro serves as a trustee; but does not include 170,000 shares Mr. Shapiro has the right to acquire pursuant to performance stock options that will vest if the Company has an operating profit for fiscal year ~~2014~~2015.

(6) Does not include 2,~~230~~265,000 shares that our current executive officers and directors have the right to acquire pursuant to performance stock options that will vest if the Company has an operating profit for fiscal year ~~2014~~2015.

4447

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 with respect to securities that may be issued under our equity compensation plans.

Plan Category	Number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights		Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights		Number of securitiesremaining ~~available~~availablefor ~~forfuture~~future ~~issuance~~issuanceunder ~~underequity~~equitycompensation ~~compensation~~ plans(excluding securitiesreflected inincolumn ~~column~~ (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		2,~~305~~315,000	$	0.18		2111,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		100,000	$	0.50		—
Total		2,~~405~~415,000	$	0.19		2111,000

The equity compensation plans approved by the security holders are the 2003 Stock Option Plan of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. Except as described in the following paragraph, the Company had not adopted as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014, without the approval of security holders, any equity compensation plan under which securities of the issuer are authorized for issuance.

On November 11, 2009 the Company entered into an agreement with an independent firm to conduct institutional investor services for a period of one year. As part of this agreement the Company issued a five-year warrant, vested upon issuance, to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. The warrant expired on November 10, 2014.

The Board of Directors has determined that directors Allen K. Fox and Brad J. Shapiro are each “independent” under the independence standards of both the NYSE MKT and the SEC.

4548

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Aggregate fees billed to us by SingerLewak LLP with respect to our ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 fiscal years were as follows:

	2013		2012
	2014		2013
Audit Fees	$	8099,000	$	80,000
Audit-Related Fees		4653,~~000~~500		4546,000
Tax Fees		—		—
All Other Fees		—		—
Total	$	~~126~~152,~~000~~500	$	~~125~~126,000

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees that Xenonics Holdings, Inc. paid for professional services for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K and for services that are normally provided by the registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; “audit-related fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements; and “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All of the audit-related services and other services described in the above table were pre-approved by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy that provides for the pre-approval of all services performed for us by SingerLewak LLP. The policy authorizes the Audit Committee to delegate to one or more of its members pre-approval authority with respect to permitted services. Pursuant to this policy, the Audit Committee delegated such authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. All pre-approval decisions must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next meeting.

4649

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules


Exhibit Number		Description

3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-123221, filed on March 9, 2005).

3.2		Bylaws of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Digital Home Theater Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on June 30, 2004).

10.1		Lease between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and Lionshead Investments, LLC dated October 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on December 18, 2008).

10.3		Agreement for the License and Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights from Lightrays, Ltd. to Xenonics, Inc., dated March 27, 1997, between Xenonics, Inc. and Lightrays, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on August 16, 2004).

10.4		Amendment to Agreement for the License and Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights, dated April 23, 1998, between Xenonics, Inc. and Lightrays, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on August 16, 2004).

10.5		Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and its directors and certain officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on May 10, 2004).*

10.6		Employment Agreement between Xenonics, Inc. and Alan P. Magerman, dated January 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on May 10, 2004).*

10.7		Amendment dated April 15, 2005 to Employment Agreement between Xenonics, Inc. and Alan P. Magerman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on April 21, 2005).*

10.8		Employment Agreement between Xenonics, Inc. and Jeffrey Kennedy, dated January 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on May 10, 2004).*

10.9		2003 Stock Option Plan of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on June 30, 2004).*

10.10		Form of Option Agreement for the 2003 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-125468, filed on June 3, 2005).*

10.11		2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Xenonics Holdings, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on February 17, 2005).*

10.12		Form of Option Agreement for the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-123221, filed on March 9, 2005).*

10.13		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on April 2, 2010).

10.14		Form of Warrant between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and the investors who are parties to a Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 with Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on April 2, 2010).

4750

10.15		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 20, 2010 between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on April 22, 2010).
10.16		Amendment dated as of April 20, 2010 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on April 22, 2010).
10.17		Form of Warrant between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and the investors who are parties to a Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 20, 2010 with Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on April 22, 2010).
10.18		Form of Secured Notes Agreement dated as of December 10, 2013 between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and Note Holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on December 19, 2013).
10.19		Form of Unsecured Notes Agreement dated as of December 10, 2013 between Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and Note Holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.F19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on December 19, 2013).
10.20		Form of Promissory Note dated as of December 10, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on December 19, 2013).
10.21		Form of Subscription Agreement entered into by the Company and investors between July 10, 2014 and September 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on May 22, 2014).
10.22		Form of Secured Convertible Note issued by the Company to investors under the Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on May 22, 2014).
10.23		Form of Security Agreement between the Company and investors under the Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on May 22, 2014).
10.24		Intercreditor Agreement, effective as of July 10, 2014, among the Company, holders of secured indebtedness identified therein and Sandlapper Securities LLC, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on May 22, 2014).
10.25		Form of Company Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. filed on May 22, 2014).
21.1		List of subsidiaries of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-115324, filed on May 10, 2004).
23.1		Consent of SingerLewak LLP
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101		The following financial information from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013; (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013; (3) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013; (4) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for years ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013; and (5) Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

*	Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which one or more directors or executive officers participate.

4851

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Alan P. Magerman Alan P. Magerman	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	December 19, 2013
/s/ Alan P. Magerman	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	January 13, 2015
/s/ Jeffrey P. Kennedy	Chief Operating Officer, President and Director	December 19, 2013
Alan P. Magerman
/s/ Jeffrey P. Kennedy	Chief Operating Officer, President and Director	January 13, 2015
Jeffrey P. Kennedy
/s/ Richard S. Kay	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial	~~December~~January 1913, ~~2013~~2015
Richard S. Kay	Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Allen K. Fox	Director
Allen K. Fox		~~December~~January 1913, ~~2013~~2015
/s/ Brad J. Shapiro	Director
Brad J. Shapiro		~~December~~January 1913, ~~2013~~2015

4952

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · XENONICS HOLDINGS, INC.