UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1001-~~4668~~ 04668

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & ~~MINERALS, LTD.~~

MINERALS, LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


BERMUDA		NONE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Clarendon House, Church Street, Hamilton, Bermuda		HM 11
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(850) ~~556~~576-~~5924~~5982

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x¨ Yes ¨x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s single class of common stock as of ~~November 14~~July 23, ~~2011~~2014 was 7695,~~106~~504,~~047~~951.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

Table of Contents

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1	Financial Statements
	Consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		3
	Consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		3
	Consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from January 31, 1953 (inception) to September 30, 2011		4
	Consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from January 31, 1953 (inception) to September 30, 2012		4
	Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from January 31, 1953 (inception) to September 30, 2011		5
	Consolidated statements of cash flows for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from January 31, 1953 (inception) to September 30, 2012		5
	Notes to consolidated financial statements		6
ITEM 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		11
ITEM 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk		1615
ITEM 4	Controls and Procedures		1715
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1	Legal Proceedings		1817
ITEM 5	Other Information		1817
ITEM 6	Exhibits		19
	Signatures		20

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

(A Bermuda Corporation)

A Development Stage Company

	September 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)			(Note)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	86,~~690~~095		$	177,~~043~~384
Total current assets		86,~~690~~095			177,~~043~~384
Certificates of deposit – Restricted		86,283			86,024
Certificates of deposit - Restricted		86,446			86,318
Petroleum leases		2,809 299			2,775,066
Total Assets	$	92,541		$	93,702
Equipment, net		—			1,374
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Total assets		2,904,272		$	2,879,507
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	~~292~~229,~~142~~064		$	~~273~~235,~~813~~073
Notes payable		25,000			25,000
Amounts due to related parties		1,268,656			1,134,922
Amounts due to related parties		1,108,063			967,292
Total current liabilities		1,497,720			1,369,995
Total current liabilities		1,425,205			1,266,105
Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, par value $.12 per share:
Authorized – 250,000,000 shares
Authorized - 250,000,000 shares
Outstanding – 71,661,603 and 70,661,604 shares, respectively		8,599,392			8,479,392
Outstanding - 75,938,518 and 75,133,824 shares, respectively		9,112,622			9,016,059
Discount on common stock		(12,~~892~~251,~~625~~886	)		(12,~~842~~184,~~625~~293	)
Capital in excess of par value		32,139,311			32,139,311
		38,846,078			38,776,078
		39,000,047			38,971,077
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(3740,~~367~~405,~~011~~226	)		(3740,~~162~~247,~~676~~370	)
Total shareholders’ equity		1,479,067			1,613,402
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)		(1,405,179	)		(1,276,293	)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,904,272		$	2,879,507
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit)	$	92,541		$	93,702

Note: The balance sheet at December 31, ~~2010~~2011 has been derived from

the audited consolidated financial statements at that date.

See accompanying notes.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - Financial Statements (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

(A Bermuda Corporation)

A Development Stage Company

(Unaudited)

													For the period from Jan. 31, 1953 (inception)
													For the period fromJan. 31, 1953 (inception)
	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						to September 30,
	Three months endedSeptember 30,						Nine months endedSeptember 30,						to September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012
Interest and other income	$	90127		$	—90		$	~~259~~127		$	~~1,494~~259		$	3,985,~~488~~650
Gain on settlement		—			—			—			—			8,124,016
		90			—			259			1,494			12,109,504
		127			90			127			259			12,109,666
Expenses:
Legal fees and costs		~~7,036~~—			27,~~857~~036			~~7,036~~—			57,~~503~~036			17,~~689~~688,~~789~~104
Administrative expenses		2519,~~410~~136			3425,~~197~~410			~~102~~46,~~858~~667			~~113~~102,~~044~~858			11,~~292~~348,~~548~~069
Salaries		31,250			31,250			93,750			9593,~~609~~750			4,~~615~~740,181
Shareholder communications		~~400~~4,300			~~821~~400			~~950~~17,566			~~4,039~~950			4,~~173~~200,~~521~~543
Goodwill impairment		—			—			—			—			801,823
Write off of unproved properties		—			—			—			—			69,~~690~~523,~~752~~271
Exploration costs		—			—			—			—			188,218
Lawsuit judgments		—			—			—			—			1,941,916
Minority interests		—			—			—			—			(632,974	)
Other		—			—			—			—			364,865
Contractual services		—			—			—			—			2,350,876
		64,096			69,125			204,594			218,195			49,476,515
		54,686			64,096			157,983			204,594			52,514,892
Income tax benefit		—			—			—			—			—
Net loss	$	(54,559	)	$	(64,006	)	$	(157,856	)	$	(204,335	)
Net loss		(64,006	)	$	(69,125	)		(204,335	)	$	(216,701	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage													$	(40,405,226	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage													$	(37,367,011	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic & diluted)		75,837,527			71,004,461			76,016,540			71,061,604
Weighted average number of Shares outstanding (basic & diluted)		71,004,461			65,861,604			71,061,604			62,747,715
Net loss per share (basic & diluted)	$	(.00	)	$	(.00	)	$	(.00	)	$	(.00	)

See accompanying notes.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - Financial Statements (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(A Bermuda Corporation)

A Development Stage Company

(Unaudited)

							For the period from Jan. 31, 1953
							For the period fromJan. 31, 1953
	Nine months ended						(inception)
	September 30,						To
	2011			2010			September 30, 2011
	2012			2011			September 30, 2012
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(~~204~~157,~~335~~856	)	$	(~~216~~204,~~701~~335	)	$	(3740,~~367~~405,~~011~~226	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Gain on settlement		—			—			(8,124,016	)
Goodwill impairment		—			—			801,823
Minority interest		—			—			(602,949	)
Depreciation		~~1,374~~—			1,~~890~~374			12,973
Write off of unproved properties		—			—			69,~~690~~491,~~752~~990
Common stock issued for services		—			—			119,500
Compensation recognized for stock option grant		—			—			75,000
Recoveries from previously written off properties		—			—			252,173
Net change in:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		~~159~~127,~~100~~725			~~(79~~159,~~656~~100	)		1,~~406~~503,~~241~~756
Net cash used in operating activities		(4330,~~861~~131	)		(~~294~~43,~~467~~861	)		(36,~~735~~874,~~514~~976	)
Investing activities:
Additions to oil, gas, and mineral properties net of assets acquired for common stock and reimbursements		~~(30,898~~—	)		(6630,~~633~~898	)		(6,~~631~~652,~~945~~219	)
Well drilling costs		~~(3,335~~—	)		—(3,335	)		(1,~~289~~285,~~327~~992	)
Sale of unproved nonoperating interests		—			—			512,595
Net proceeds from settlement		—			—			8,124,016
Proceeds from relinquishment of surface rights		—			—			246,733
Purchase of certificate of deposit		(~~259~~127	)		(~~762~~259	)		(~~140~~141,~~938~~100	)
Redemption of certification of deposit		—			—			54,655
Purchase of minority interest in CPC		—			—			(801,823	)
Purchase of fixed assets		—			—			(74,623	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(34,492	)		(67,395	)		(657	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(127	)		(34,492	)		(17,758	)
Financing activities:
Notes payable proceeds		—			—			184,988
Repayment of loans		—			~~(48,198~~—	)		(159,988	)
Sale of common stock net of expenses		7028,~~000~~969			~~760~~70,000			31,~~288~~442,~~112~~080
Shares issued upon exercise of options		—			—			891,749
Sale of shares by subsidiary		—			—			820,000
Sale of subsidiary shares		—			—			3,720,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		7028,~~000~~969			~~711~~70,~~802~~000			36,~~744~~898,~~861~~829
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(81,~~353~~289	)		~~349~~(8,~~940~~353	)		86,~~690~~095
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		177,~~043~~384			917,~~207~~043			—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	86,~~690~~095		$	~~359~~8,~~147~~690		$	86,~~690~~095

See accompanying notes.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 1 Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. (“the Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Coastal Petroleum Company (“Coastal Petroleum”) and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2011~~2012. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011.

Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)), which requires an entity to recognize revenue from the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance addresses in particular contracts with more than one performance obligation as well as the accounting for some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and provides for additional disclosures with respect to revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. With respect to public entities, this update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is not permitted. We believe that our implementation of this guidance will have no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2.

Going Concern

AsThe ~~of September 30, 2011, the~~ Company ~~had~~has no recurring revenues, had recurring losses ~~from~~since ~~operations~~2006 and prior to 2005, and has ~~had~~a andeficit accumulated ~~deficit~~ during the development stage. The Company’s current cash position is not adequate to fund existing operations or exploration and development ~~of its oil and gas properties~~. ~~Currently,~~ ~~management is actively pursuing funding to allow the Company to undertake exploration efforts on its own.~~ The Company has an agreement in place with a director ~~which~~pursuant ~~provides~~to which the director ~~with~~may ~~options to~~ further fund the Company to continue operations and exploration ~~of its leases~~. The Company continues to be in contact with several parties interested in investing in the Company so that the Company could explore its leases on its own. In addition, the Company has been in contact with other parties interested in working with the Company, in buying some of the Company’s leases or in buying or earning an interest in those leases. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain any funding, that sufficient funding can be obtained, or that the Company will be able to raise necessary funds ~~through the sale of some of its leases or interests in those leases~~.

These situations raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or amounts and classification of liabilities, which may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note 3. Net loss per share

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 1

Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3.

Net loss per share

Net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The Company’s basic and diluted calculations of earnings per share (“EPS”) are the same because the exercise of options is not assumed in calculating diluted EPS, as the result would be anti-dilutive. The Company has included common shares to be issued to Robert J. Angerer, Sr. for advances made through September 30, 2012.

Note 4.

Unproved Oil, Gas and Mineral Properties

In December 2011, the Company determined that its leases and capitalized development costs were impaired due to the time remaining under some of the leases, the Company being unable to establish quantifiable production on the leases, and in the case of less prospective leases, for nonpayment of lease rentals, and recorded an impairment charge of $2,832,519.

Montana Leases

The Company’s ~~primary~~had a presence in ~~Montana is in~~ Valley County, Montana, where it ~~holds~~held leases covering approximately 32,313 net acres, which ~~are~~were the remaining unexpired leases from those leases the Company acquired in three separate acquisitions between July 2005 and February 2006. ~~The~~Subsequent to 2011, these leases ~~acquired~~expired indue ~~those~~to ~~acquisitions~~the ~~are~~expiration ~~contiguous~~of tothe ~~each~~time ~~other~~remaining ~~and~~under ~~are~~some ~~referred~~of the leases, the Company being unable to ~~collectively~~establish asquantifiable “production on the ~~Valley~~leases, ~~County~~and ~~Leases~~in the case of less prospective leases, for nonpayment of lease rentals, and an impairment charge of $2,832,519 was recorded.”

The first acquisition of the Valley County Leases was in July 2005, when the Company acquired the rights to drill two 6,500 foot wells to test Mississippian Lodgepole reefs in Valley County, in northeast Montana for a one time fee of $50,000 from an entity controlled by one of the Company’s Directors. That acquisition included a small amount of acreage and the option to drill fifty additional prospects in the Valley County area.

The second acquisition of the Valley County Leases was in November 2005, when the Company acquired a group of oil and gas lease rights to approximately 109,423 net acres in eastern Montana for $1,568,000 from EOG Resources, Inc. and Great Northern Gas Company. These leases are subject to various overriding royalty interests to others ranging up to 19.5%. These leases expire in years from 2011 to 2014.

The final acquisition of acreage within the Valley County Leases was in February 2006, when the Company acquired additional oil and gas leases in eastern Montana covering 27,740 net acres contiguous to its existing Montana leases. These leases were acquired from the Bureau of Land Management and United States Department of the Interior.

North Dakota Leases

~~The Company currently holds approximately 400 acres of leases covering its Red River prospect in North Dakota.~~ In July 2005, the Company ~~originally~~ acquired leases to the deeper rights in approximately 21,688 net acres in and near Slope County, North Dakota. ~~for~~Subsequent ato ~~one time fee of $50~~2011,~~000~~ these ~~from~~leases anexpired ~~entity~~due ~~controlled~~to bythe ~~one~~expiration of the ~~Company’s~~time ~~Directors~~remaining ~~and~~under ~~the Company has invested~~ some ~~additional~~of ~~funds~~the toleases, ~~geochemically~~the ~~test~~Company ~~and~~being ~~high-grade~~unable ~~these~~to ~~and other~~establish ~~prospects~~quantifiable production on the leases., ~~The~~and ~~majority~~in of the ~~leases~~case ~~previously~~of ~~held~~less inprospective ~~North~~leases, ~~Dakota~~for ~~have~~nonpayment ~~expired~~of lease rentals.

Note 5.

Income Taxes

For the ~~three and~~ nine month periods ending September 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Company reported a loss for both financial statement reporting and income tax purposes. The Company has provided a 100% valuation allowance on its deferred tax asset as a result of its net operating loss carryforwards. The Company had approximately $109,~~000~~441,000 in net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, ~~2010~~ 2011.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 1

Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6.

Related Party Transactions

~~Oil~~See ~~and~~Note ~~Gas~~8 ~~Exploration~~also. ~~Activities~~

Pursuant to a written agreement with respect to the Valley County Leases, the Company has used an entity controlled by an individual who is a shareholder and director of the Company to perform geotechnical analysis of potential drilling sites at a cost of $1,000 per site. The Company paid no amounts to this entity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Services

Through May 2009, the Company paid a monthly retainer to the law firm of Angerer & Angerer which had been litigation counsel to the Company for more than twenty-five years and also served the Company in that capacity as well as others including general counsel services, management services, public relations, shareholder relations and representing the Company before state and federal agencies for permitting. The principals of the law firm included two individuals who are collectively shareholders , officers and a director of the Company. ~~The Company accrued and expensed $60,000 in legal fees to Angerer & Angerer in 2009.~~ No amounts were paid or accrued in ~~2011~~the nine month periods ending September 30, 2012 or ~~2010~~2011. The Company owes $150,000 to Angerer & Angerer at September 30, ~~2011 and December 31, 2010~~2012.

~~From~~The ~~June~~Company ~~2009~~expensed ~~until~~$0 ~~his~~and ~~resignation on January 14~~$7,036 ~~2010,~~for ~~the~~legal ~~Company~~fees ~~retained~~by ~~Robert~~the J.law ~~Angerer,~~firm ~~Sr.~~of asIgler & ~~legal~~Dougherty, ~~counsel~~P. MrA. ~~Angerer~~, ~~had~~during ~~been litigation counsel to~~ the ~~Company~~nine ~~for~~months ~~more~~ended ~~than twenty-five years before his resignation. As counsel for the Company he served the Company as litigation counsel~~September 30, ~~but~~2012 ~~also provided the Company with general counsel services~~ and ~~management~~2011, ~~services and represented the Company before state and federal agencies for permitting~~respectively. Mr. ~~Angerer, Sr~~Herbert D. isHaughton, ~~also~~ a shareholder ~~and a director~~ of ~~the~~Igler & ~~Company.~~Dougherty, ~~The Company accrued and expensed no legal fees to Mr~~P. ~~Angerer~~A., ~~Sr.~~was ~~for~~elected ~~the~~a ~~three~~director ~~and~~of ~~nine~~Coastal Caribbean ~~months~~and ~~ended~~of ~~September 30,~~Coastal ~~2011,~~Petroleum ~~and~~in ~~2010~~December 2005.

~~Also~~The ~~since~~Company ~~June~~has ~~2009, the~~been ~~Company~~accruing ~~has~~compensation ~~retained~~and ~~Robert~~related J.benefits ~~Angerer,~~to ~~Jr.~~it ~~who~~its ~~serves~~president asand CEO. During the ~~Company’s~~nine ~~corporate~~months ~~secretary~~ended ~~and~~September 30, ~~handles~~2012 ~~management~~and ~~services~~2011, ~~public~~the ~~relations,~~Company ~~shareholder~~accrued ~~relations~~compensation and ~~management~~retirement benefits of $114,984. At September 30, 2012, the Company’s ~~website.~~owes Nocompensation ~~amounts~~and ~~were~~related ~~paid~~benefits ~~or accrued~~to inits ~~2011~~president orand ~~2010,~~CEO ~~related~~of to$656,250 ~~these~~and $174,906, ~~services~~respectively.

The Company ~~incurred~~has ~~and~~also ~~expensed~~been ~~$7,036~~accruing ~~and~~directors’ ~~$5,503 in legal~~ fees. toDuring the ~~law~~nine ~~firm~~months ~~of Igler~~ended September &30, ~~Dougherty~~2012, PAthe Company accrued $18,750 ~~during~~of ~~the~~fees ~~nine~~to ~~months~~directors. ~~ended~~At September 30, ~~2011~~2012, ~~and~~the ~~2010~~Company owes $287,500 ~~respectively~~in directors’ fees.

~~The~~Note ~~Company owed Igler & Dougherty, PA $14,595 and $~~7~~,559 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively~~. ~~Mr.~~ ~~Herbert~~Certificates ~~D. Haughton, a shareholder~~ of ~~the~~Deposit ~~firm,~~– ~~was elected a director of Coastal Caribbean and of Coastal Petroleum in December 2005.~~ Restricted

The Company has pledged certificates of deposit for pollution bond requirements under three previous well permits.

Note 8.

Stock Transactions

Beginning in 2010, the Company has entered into various agreements to sell and sold restricted shares of its common stock for cash or in return for payment of certain Company expenses that have allowed the Company to pay lease rentals and other administrative costs necessary to keep the Company viable through the current period.

On May 20, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Robert J. Angerer, Sr., for the sale of 857,142 restricted and unregistered shares of common stock of the Company for $60,000, in order to cover certain Company expenses. Mr. Angerer also exercised an option under the agreement for 142,857 shares of common stock for $10,000. The Company plans to issue Mr. Angerer a total of 999,999 restricted and unregistered shares of common stock for investments made under this agreement. This agreement has concluded.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 1

Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 78. ~~Certificates~~Stock ofTransactions ~~Deposit – Restricted~~(Continued)

Then in October 2011, in order to fund immediate cash needs at that time, the Company entered into another agreement with Robert J. Angerer, Sr., for an immediate infusion of $30,000 cash and the commitment to spend $130,000 in operational costs to complete the Federal 1-19A well. The agreement also provided options for Mr. Angerer to provide additional funding. In return, the Company ~~has~~will ~~pledged~~issue ~~certificates~~4,444,444 restricted and unregistered shares of ~~deposit~~common stock to Mr. Angerer. Under this agreement, Mr. Angerer provided a total of $90,000 in cash to the Company; he provided $55,000 in 2011 and an additional $35,000 through August of 2012. Mr. Angerer also paid directly $70,000 for ~~pollution~~expenses ~~bond~~related ~~requirements~~to ~~under~~the ~~three~~Federal ~~previous~~1-19A well. ~~permits~~The Company plans to issue Mr. Angerer a total of 4,444,444 restricted and unregistered shares of common stock for investments made under this agreement. The agreement was completed and all other options under the agreement expired. During 2011, 3,472,221 shares have been reflected as issued under the October 2011 agreement; and at September 30, 2012, 972,223 shares remain to be issued to Mr. Angerer.

~~Note~~In 8September 2012, the Company entered into a new agreement with Robert J. ~~Notes~~Angerer, ~~Payable~~Sr., to provide additional funding in return for shares of restricted and unregistered shares of common stock of the Company at $.03 per share. Mr. Angerer agreed to provide up to $1,000,000 to perform a nitrogen fracturing operation on the Federal 1-19A well, to abandon two existing wells, to pay existing liabilities, and to allow the Company to cure its delinquent legal and regulatory filings. In conjunction with this agreement, the Company entered into a separation agreement with Phillip W. Ware. Mr. Angerer completed the nitrogen fracturing operation on the Federal 1-19A well at a cost of $171,501 in 2012. The Company plans to issue 3,564,705 shares of restricted and unregistered shares of common stock to Mr. Angerer for 2012. In 2013, Mr. Angerer paid $60,000 to the Company in order for the Company to pay legal compliance costs and paid $343,988 of existing liabilities of the Company. In February 2014, Mr. Angerer paid $30,500 for regulatory compliance costs on behalf of the Company. The Company plans to issue Mr. Angerer 15,834,199 shares of restricted and unregistered shares of common stock in exchange for the funds paid into the Company during 2013 and through June 30, 2014, pursuant to the 2012 agreement.

~~During~~As of the ~~first~~date ~~nine months~~ of ~~2009~~this report, the Company ~~borrowed~~plans ~~$48,198 from two individuals, which was used~~ to ~~make~~issue ~~annual rental payments on specific leases~~Mr. ~~The~~Angerer ~~loans~~24,843,347 ~~are~~shares ~~non~~of restricted ~~interest bearing~~ and ~~have~~unregistered noshares ~~set~~of ~~repayment~~common ~~terms. The~~stock ~~individuals~~in ~~were~~exchange ~~granted~~for athe ~~0.5%~~funds ~~royalty~~paid ~~interest~~into in the ~~leases~~Company ~~for~~through ~~which~~ the ~~borrowed~~various ~~money~~agreements ~~was~~described ~~used~~above tothat ~~pay~~were ~~rentals,~~entered ~~which~~into ~~are~~and ~~located~~performed ~~primarily~~from ~~in the~~2011 ~~Starbuck~~through ~~prospect area in Montana.~~June ~~These~~30, ~~loans were repaid in January 2010~~2014.

During August 2009, the Company borrowed $25,000 from a consultant and also agreed to pay the consultant a fee of $25,000 to identify investors to consummate an agreement and fund exploration. The funds from the loan were used to pay the Company’s annual corporate fee to Bermuda as well as certain other operational expenses. The loan is non interest bearing and has no set repayment terms. No investor agreements have been consummated by the consultant at September 30, 2011, therefore the $25,000 loan is not currently due and the $25,000 fee has not been earned.

Note 9. Stock Transactions

On January 14, 2010, the Company and Coastal Petroleum entered into a letter agreement with Robert J. Angerer, Sr. for the funding of immediate cash needs and granted Mr. Angerer an option to fund the Company’s and Coastal Petroleum’s future obligations. Under the agreement Mr. Angerer provided compensation to the Company including $300,000 cash and the forgiveness of $150,000 of legal fees owed to his law firm, Angerer & Angerer, forgiveness of $21,500 in director fees owed to him and credit of $240,000 for the completion of the Company’s purchase of leases on which there is a Red River oil and gas development prospect. In return, Mr. Angerer was issued 14,400,000 Rule 144 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and was provided an option to further fund the Company. Under the agreement, Mr. Angerer could exercise up to four options by paying $3 million for each option beginning three months after the date of the agreement and thereafter in three month intervals. In return for the funding, Mr. Angerer would earn up to a total of 36% of the Company’s operations in North Dakota and Montana in increments per exercised option and a 20% interest in Coastal Petroleum. There was also one extension available to extend the time to exercise the first option for three months in exchange for the payment of $50,000. Simultaneous with this transaction, Mr. Angerer resigned as the Vice President of both the Company and Coastal, but will remain as a Director and the Chairman of the Board of Directors for both the Company and Coastal Petroleum.

On April 29, 2010, Mr. Angerer paid $50,000 and elected to extend the option to fund the Company’s operations. However, Mr. Angerer did not exercise his option within the required time and in July 2010, the agreement expired by its terms.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 1

Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9. ~~Stock~~Commitments, ~~Transactions~~Contingencies and Subsequent Events

OnSee ~~May 28,~~Note ~~2010,~~8 ~~the~~regarding ~~Company~~subsequent ~~entered agreements with two individuals who paid $10,000 each in return for each individual receiving 162,500 shares of the Company’s common~~ stock ~~and a 1/4% overriding royalty in Coastal Petroleum’s Starbuck East Montana shallow gas leases~~transactions. An entity that brought the investors to the Company also received a similar overriding royalty and 67,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company used this money to pay the lease rentals that were due on September 1, 2010.

OnSubsequent ~~August~~to September 2630, ~~2010~~2012, the Company’s ~~entered~~property ~~into~~leases aexpired ~~letter~~due ~~agreement~~to ~~with Robert J. Angerer, Sr. a Director and~~ the ~~Chairman~~expiration of the ~~Board~~time ofremaining ~~Directors for~~under ~~both~~some ~~the~~of ~~Company and Coastal, for~~ the ~~sale of 8~~leases,~~000,000~~ ~~restricted shares of~~ the Company’s ~~common~~being ~~stock~~unable ~~for~~to ~~$400,000,~~establish toquantifiable beproduction ~~used~~on ~~for~~the ~~exploration~~leases, ~~prospect acquisition~~ and ~~operating~~in ~~costs. Approximately $250,000 of~~ the ~~proceeds~~case ~~from the sale~~ of ~~the~~less ~~stock~~prospective ~~was used to drill a test well on Coastal’s Starbuck East shallow gas prospect in Valley County~~leases, ~~Montana~~for ~~and~~nonpayment ~~another~~of ~~$40,000~~lease ~~was~~rental ~~used to acquire additional Lodgepole prospects in North Dakota which subsequently expired before they could be drilled~~payments.

OnThe ~~May 20, 2011, the~~ Company ~~entered~~is ~~into~~delinquent anin ~~agreement~~filing ~~with~~its ~~Robert~~periodic J.reports ~~Angerer,~~required ~~Sr.,~~under athe ~~Director~~Securities ~~and~~Exchange ~~the~~Act ~~Chairman~~ of ~~the~~1934 ~~Board~~due ofto ~~Directors~~lack ~~for~~of ~~both~~funding. ~~the~~The Company ~~and~~is ~~Coastal,~~currently preparing ~~for~~its ~~the~~delinquent ~~sale~~reports ofand ~~857,142~~plans ~~restricted~~to ~~shares~~file ofall ~~the~~delinquent ~~Company’s~~reports ~~common stock for $60,000, payable~~ in ~~three~~2014. ~~tranches~~The ~~from~~previous ~~the~~inaction ~~date~~to ofbring the ~~agreement,~~Company’s ~~with~~filings ~~the~~current ~~last~~may ~~$8,000~~result ~~payment made~~ in ~~July 2011.~~de-registration Inof ~~addition, under~~ the ~~Agreement~~Company ~~Mr. Angerer~~with ~~could~~the ~~infuse~~Securities anExchange ~~additional~~Commission ~~$240,000~~(SEC). inLoss ~~funds through the purchase~~ of this ~~additional~~status ~~shares,~~may atlimit the ~~market~~Company’s ~~price~~ability atto ~~the~~access ~~time~~capital ofmarkets. ~~the~~The ~~capital~~Company ~~infusion,~~is inworking ~~order~~ to ~~complete~~file the ~~Federal~~delinquent ~~1-19A well and cover other company expenses. In August 2011~~reports, ~~Mr. Angerer~~but ~~exercised~~there ~~$10,000~~is ofno ~~this~~assurance ~~option~~that ~~for~~the ~~142,857~~Company ~~shares~~will ofbe ~~common~~able ~~stock,~~to ~~with~~file ~~the~~its ~~remainder~~delinquent ~~of the option expiring~~reports.

OnIn ~~October 17,~~September ~~2011~~2012, the Company entered into ana separation agreement ~~with~~and ~~Robert~~release J.with ~~Angerer,~~Phillip ~~Sr.~~Ware, aformerly ~~Director and~~ the ~~Chairman~~CEO ofand ~~the~~President ~~Board~~ of ~~Directors for both~~ the Company ~~and Coastal~~, ~~for~~in ~~the~~connection with ~~funding of~~ the ~~Company’s~~ ~~immediate~~September ~~cash~~2012 ~~needs~~agreement ~~and~~with ~~granting~~Robert MrJ. Angerer, anSr. ~~option~~as todisclosed ~~fund~~in ~~the~~Note ~~Company’s future obligations~~8. ~~Under the agreement~~ Mr. ~~Angerer~~Ware ~~provided~~agreed ~~financial~~that ~~support~~his toexisting ~~the~~options ~~Company~~for ~~including $30~~450,000 ~~cash~~shares ~~and~~of ~~the~~common ~~commitment~~stock ~~to spend~~would ~~$130,000~~expire inwithin ~~operational~~90 ~~costs~~days toof ~~complete~~ the ~~Federal~~termination ~~1-19A well in Valley County~~date, ~~Montana.~~which Inwas ~~return~~February 28, Mr 2013. ~~Angerer~~ ~~was~~The ~~issued~~options ~~4,444,444~~were ~~Rule~~not ~~144~~exercised ~~restricted~~and ~~shares~~have ofexpired. ~~the~~The Company’s ~~common~~agreed ~~stock.~~to ~~Under~~pay ~~the agreement,~~ Mr. ~~Angerer also~~Ware ~~has two future options; the first is to invest an additional~~ $25200,000 toand ~~pay~~issued ~~lease~~him ~~rentals~~an ~~due~~option onto ~~November~~ purchase 1, ~~2011~~000,000 inshares ~~exchange~~of ~~for~~restricted ~~694,444~~and unregistered shares of common stock ~~and~~for ~~the~~$.03 ~~second~~per isshare. toThis ~~invest~~option expires ~~$815,000~~ on ~~or before January~~December 31, ~~2012,~~2017. ~~in exchange~~The ~~for~~Company ~~22,638,888~~has ~~shares~~not ofpaid ~~common~~Mr. Ware ~~stock,~~or toissued ~~provide~~the ~~funds~~stock ~~for~~option ~~exploration.~~as Onof ~~October 28,~~July ~~2011~~23, 2014. Mr. ~~Angerer~~Ware ~~exercised~~resigned ~~the~~from ~~first option and invested~~ the ~~$25,000~~Company ~~necessary~~effective ~~to pay the November~~February 128, ~~2011 lease rentals~~2013.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

Statements included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are not historical in nature, are intended to be forward looking statements. The Company cautions readers that forward looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward looking statements. Among the risks and uncertainties are: the uncertainty of securing additional funding through the sale of shares of Coastal Petroleum and/or Coastal Caribbean; changes in the income tax laws relating to tax loss carry forwards; the failure of the Company’s test wells to locate oil or gas reserves or the failure to locate oil or gas reserves which are economically feasible to recover; reductions in world wide oil or gas prices; adverse weather conditions; or mechanical failures of equipment used to explore the Company’s leases.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for its oil and gas properties. All costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities whether successful or unsuccessful are capitalized.

The capitalized costs are subject to a ceiling test which basically limits such costs to the aggregate of the estimated present value discounted at a 10% rate of future net revenues from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties.

The Company assesses whether its unproved properties are impaired on a periodic basis. This assessment is based upon work completed on the properties to date, the expiration date of its leases and technical data from the properties and adjacent areas.

General

We are an ~~active~~ independent oil and gas exploration ~~company~~ ~~and through our subsidiary, Coastal Petroleum, we hold mineral rights in Montana and North Dakota in the oil producing region known as the Williston Basin~~company. ~~Our~~ ~~objective formations on those leases include the Lodgepole and the Eagle among others.~~ The Company’s future growth will be driven primarily by exploration and development activities. Our business strategy is to increase shareholder value by acquiring and drilling reasonably priced prospects that have good potential, ~~whether in the Williston Basin or in other parts of the United States,~~ with the goal of shaping the Company into a ~~producing~~highly productive independent oil and gas firm. We will continue to seek high quality exploration projects with potential for providing long-term drilling inventories that generate high returns.

InDuring ~~Montana~~2010 and 2011, we ~~have~~were ~~obtained~~primarily ~~the~~focused ~~rights~~on and engaged in raising capital to ~~explore~~fund ~~for oil~~the ~~and~~Company ~~gas~~so inthat ~~one~~we ~~area~~could ~~which~~recommence ~~will~~the exploration beof our ~~primary~~leases ~~area~~in ofMontana ~~focus~~and North Dakota. ~~This~~Due ~~primary~~to ~~area~~the isrecession aand ~~large~~the ~~assembly~~fragile state of ~~leases~~the ~~covering~~country’s ~~approximately~~financial 32market,~~313~~ ~~net~~capital ~~acres~~was ina ~~Valley~~scarce ~~County~~commodity to obtain. Ultimately, ~~located~~no inoutside ~~northeastern~~parties ~~Montana~~were ~~close~~able to ~~known~~provide ~~production~~the ~~from~~capital necessary ato ~~Lodgepole reef~~begin exploration. ~~This~~During ~~area~~2012 ofand ~~Montana~~2013, ~~has~~the aCompany’s ~~number~~own ofexploration ~~other~~efforts ~~producing~~in ~~formations~~Montana inand ~~addition~~North toDakota ~~the~~did ~~Lodgepole,~~not ~~including~~result ~~the~~in ~~Eagle~~any ~~sands.~~quantifiable ~~These~~success and the leases ~~cover~~have ~~our~~expired. ~~Starbuck~~Except ~~East~~for ~~shallow~~a ~~natural~~few ~~gas~~reclamation ~~prospect~~projects, ~~that~~we ~~includes~~do ~~the~~not plan ~~Eagle~~any ~~sands.~~further Weoperations ~~also~~or ~~hold~~expenditures ~~leases~~on ~~in southwestern~~the ~~North~~former ~~Dakota~~drilling ~~covering~~program ain ~~Red~~Montana ~~River~~and ~~oil~~North ~~prospect.~~Dakota if the

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

~~During~~ U.S. ~~2010~~Bureau ~~and~~of ~~for~~Land ~~2011~~Management ~~to-date,~~(BLM) weprevails ~~were primarily focused~~ on ~~and engaged in raising capital to fund~~ the ~~Company~~claim so that ~~we could recommence~~ the ~~exploration~~lease ofwith ~~our leases. Due to~~ the ~~recession~~Federal ~~and~~1-19A ~~the~~well ~~fragile~~has ~~state of the country’s financial market, exploration funds were a scarce commodity to obtain~~expired. WeThe ~~contacted,~~combination ~~met~~of: ~~with and negotiated with various individuals and groups during the year. To date,~~ no ~~outside~~ parties ~~have~~being ~~provided~~located ~~the~~that ~~funds necessary to begin exploration. While we~~ were ~~close~~interested toin ~~consummating an agreement~~ working with ~~one entity and amended~~ the ~~articles~~Company; ~~of our subsidiary to be prepared to complete the transaction, the other party could not deliver the capital as promised. The combination of the broken deal~~ and the state of the economy,; left the Company with no other viable alternative other than to sell shares of its common stock to raise capital necessary to remain a viable public company, as described below and toin ~~retain~~Note ~~its~~8 ~~most~~to ~~valuable~~the consolidated ~~leases~~financial statements.

WeThe ~~continue~~Company tohas bebeen ~~actively~~sustained ~~engaged~~only inthrough ~~pursuing~~the ~~funding~~purchases ~~for~~of ~~our~~stock ~~Drilling~~by ~~Program~~the Chairman of the Board of Directors, Robert J. Angerer, Sr. The ~~Drilling~~funds ~~Program~~that isMr. Angerer anhas ~~aggressive~~provided ~~exploration operation~~allowed ~~which~~for ~~would~~the ~~allow~~abandonment usexpenditures and payment of operating costs to ~~explore~~keep the ~~potential~~Company viable. On January 14, 2010, Robert J. Angerer, Sr., the chairman of ~~each~~the board of directors and vice president of the ~~areas~~Company weat ~~hold~~the ~~under~~time, ~~lease~~entered into a letter agreement for the funding of immediate cash needs and granting Mr. Angerer ~~The~~an ~~Drilling~~option ~~Program~~to ~~covers~~fund ~~exploration~~the inCompany’s ~~two~~and ~~areas:~~Coastal’s afuture obligations. Under ~~development~~the ~~Red~~agreement, ~~River~~Mr. Angerer ~~Formation~~provided ~~prospect~~compensation into ~~Slope~~the ~~County~~Company including $300,000 ~~North~~cash ~~Dakota~~and the forgiveness of $150,000 onof legal ~~approximately~~fees ~~400~~owed to his law firm, Angerer & Angerer, forgiveness of $21,500 in ~~acres~~director wefees ~~acquired;~~owed to him and ~~twelve~~credit ~~step~~of ~~out~~$240,000 ~~wells~~to ~~from~~him for the ~~Federal~~completion ~~1-19~~of ~~well~~the Company’s purchase of leases on ~~the~~which ~~Starbuck~~there ~~East~~is a Red River oil and gas development prospect. In inreturn, ~~Montana~~Mr. ~~The~~Angerer ~~Company~~was isissued ~~proceeding~~14,400,000 ~~with~~Rule 144 restricted shares of the ~~relatively~~Company’s ~~inexpensive~~common ~~process~~stock ofand ~~permitting~~provided ~~wells~~an inoption ~~its~~to ~~main~~further ~~block~~fund ofthe ~~leases~~Company. inMr. Angerer ~~Valley County,~~exercised ~~Montana,~~the inone ~~order~~extension granted him to ~~accommodate~~extend the ~~drilling~~time ofto exercise the ~~expected~~first ~~wells~~option for three months in exchange for the payment of $50,000. The remaining options expired unexercised.

OnSimultaneous with the January 14, 2010, Robert J. Angerer, Sr., the chairman of the board of directors and vice president of the Company at the time, entered into a letter agreement for the funding of immediate cash needs and granting Mr. Angerer an option to fund the Company’s future obligations. The agreement was similar to the deal that was not consummated by a third party during 2009. Under the agreement Mr. Angerer provided compensation to the Company including $300,000 cash and the forgiveness of $150,000 of legal fees owed to his law firm, Angerer & Angerer, forgiveness of $21,500 in director fees owed to him and credit of $240,000 to him for the completion of the Company’s purchase of leases on which there is a Red River oil and gas development prospect. In return, Mr. Angerer was issued 14,400,000 Rule 144 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and provided an option to further fund the Company. Simultaneous with this transaction, Mr. Angerer resigned as the Vice President of both the Company and ~~Coastal~~its subsidiary, but has remained as a Director and the Chairman of the Board of Directors for both ~~the Company and Coastal~~. Mr. Angerer exercised the one extension granted him to extend the time to exercise the first option for three months in exchange for the payment of $50,000, however, the remaining options expired unexercised.

OnDuring ~~August 26,~~the fourth quarter of 2010, ~~after~~ the ~~January~~Company ~~agreement~~drilled ~~expired,~~an ~~the~~exploratory ~~Company~~gas ~~entered~~well ~~into~~on aits ~~separate~~Valley ~~letter~~County, ~~agreement~~Montana ~~with~~Leases ~~Mr. Angerer~~to ~~for~~test ~~the~~multiple ~~sale~~zones potentially ofcontaining ~~8,000,000~~natural ~~restricted~~gas. ~~shares~~The ofwell ~~the~~was ~~Company’s common~~logged ~~stock~~and ~~for~~cased ~~$400,000,~~and tothe beresults ~~used~~and ~~for~~information ~~exploration,~~gathered ~~prospect~~from ~~acquisition~~the ~~and~~well ~~operating~~were ~~costs.~~evaluated ~~Using~~in ~~some~~order to provide an assessment of the ~~funds~~potential ~~from~~for ~~this~~natural ~~sale~~gas ofproduction ~~stock,~~from wethe several target horizons drilled athrough ~~test~~at ~~well~~this onlocation. ~~Coastal’s~~The ~~Starbuck~~information ~~East~~gathered ~~shallow~~was ~~gas~~presented ~~prospect~~to inthe ~~Valley~~lessor, ~~County~~the BLM, ~~Montana for~~but ~~approximately~~the ~~$365,000.~~BLM Weconsidered ~~also~~the ~~acquired~~information ~~four~~insufficient ~~additional~~to ~~high-graded~~show ~~Lodgepole~~economic ~~Reef~~quantities ~~prospects~~of ingas ~~North~~necessary ~~Dakota~~to ~~for~~maintain ~~$20,000~~the ~~which~~leases ~~subsequently~~and ~~expired~~has instated ~~2011~~that ~~before~~it ~~funding~~will issue ~~could~~a befinal ~~secured~~order tofinding ~~drill~~that ~~them.~~the Weleases ~~continue~~had toexpired ~~speak~~under totheir ~~and~~terms. ~~seek~~The ~~entities interested~~Company inis ~~funding~~considering ~~our~~an ~~Drilling~~appeal ~~Program~~of this determination.

In North Dakota, we held the working interest on approximately 400 net acres in Slope County, however, due to lack of funds and no entity to partner with, we were not able to explore those leases prior to them expiring. Other leases that we previously held in North Dakota expired during the first quarter of 2012, because we were not able to raise the capital needed to fund drilling exploratory wells to test the Lodgepole Reef prospects on the leases.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

~~During~~Mr. Angerer ~~the~~has ~~fourth~~undertaken, ~~quarter~~pursuant ofto ~~2010~~his most recent agreement, to bring the Company to ~~drilled~~a andebt ~~exploratory~~free ~~gas~~operating ~~well~~position onover ~~its Valley~~the ~~County,~~next ~~Montana~~twelve ~~Leases~~months. toIn ~~test~~addition, ~~multiple~~in ~~zones~~light ~~potentially~~of ~~containing~~recent ~~natural~~technological ~~gas.~~advances ~~The~~in ~~well~~horizontal ~~has~~drilling ~~been~~and ~~logged~~hydraulic ~~and~~fracturing ~~cased~~methods, ~~and~~consultants ~~the~~are ~~results~~currently ~~and~~assessing ~~information~~certain ~~gathered~~areas ~~from~~to ~~the~~determine ~~well~~whether they ~~continue~~are toprospective befor ~~evaluated~~oil and gas in ~~order~~sufficient quantities and properties to ~~provide~~allow anthe ~~assessment~~use of ~~the potential~~horizontal ~~for~~drilling ~~natural~~and ~~gas~~“fracking”. ~~production~~If, ~~from~~after their assessment, the ~~several~~consultants ~~target~~identify ~~horizons~~certain ~~drilled~~areas ~~through~~as atprospective, ~~this~~the ~~location.~~Company Tointends ~~date,~~to seek weanother doentity ~~not~~to ~~have~~work awith ~~definitive~~to ~~determination~~acquire asleases over and to ~~whether~~test ~~economic~~the ~~quantities~~prospective ofareas for oil and gas. ~~exist~~At ~~within~~this point the ~~target~~areas ~~zones~~being atassessed ~~this location~~are confidential and may or may not result in the identification of any prospective areas.

~~On May~~Liquidity ~~20, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr.~~and Angerer for the sale of 857,142 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock for $60,000 payable in three tranches from the date of the agreement with the last $8,000 payment made in July 2011. In addition, under the Agreement Mr.Capital ~~Angerer~~Resources had the option to infuse an additional $240,000 in funds, through the purchase of additional shares, in order to complete the Federal 1-19A well and cover other company expenses. In August 2011, Mr. Angerer exercised $10,000 of this option for 142,857 shares of common stock, in order to fund certain immediate needs of the Company, but the remainder of the option expired.

OnLiquidity October 17, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Robert J. Angerer, Sr., a Director and the Chairman of the Board of Directors for both the Company and Coastal, for the funding of the Company’s immediate cash needs and granting Mr. Angerer an option to fund the Company’s future obligations. Under the Agreement Mr. Angerer provided financial support to the Company including $30,000 cash and the commitment to spend $130,000 in operational costs to complete the Federal 1-19A well in Valley County, Montana. In return, Mr. Angerer was issued 4,444,444 Rule 144 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. Under the Agreement, Mr. Angerer also has two future options; the first is to invest an additional $25,000 to pay lease rentals due on November 1, 2011, in return for 694,444 shares of common stock and the second is to invest $815,000 on or before January 31, 2012, in return for 22,638,888 shares of common stock, to provide funds for exploration. Mr. Angerer exercised the first of these options on October 28, 2011.

~~Utilizing~~As ~~the~~more ~~funds~~fully described ~~from~~in Note 2 to the ~~October~~ ~~2011~~consolidated ~~agreement~~financial ~~with~~statements, ~~Mr. Angerer~~we have no significant assets or recurring revenues, ~~the~~have ~~Company~~experienced ~~has~~recurring ~~recommenced~~losses ~~operations~~and onhave a deficit accumulated during the ~~Federal~~development ~~1-19A~~stage. ~~well~~We, inalong ~~Valley~~with ~~County~~various other related parties, ~~Montana.~~settled Toseveral ~~date~~lawsuits in 2005, wewhich ~~have~~were ~~logged~~filed by the ~~well~~Company, ~~and~~our ~~perforated~~subsidiary itCoastal inPetroleum ~~two~~Company ~~deeper~~and ~~zones~~other ~~that~~related ~~are~~parties ~~targets~~against ~~for~~the ~~natural~~State ~~gas~~of Florida. ~~In addition,~~All weof ~~have~~these ~~prepared~~lawsuits were related to the ~~well~~State’s ~~for~~actions alimiting ~~40,000~~our ability ~~pound~~to ~~sand~~commence ~~and~~development ~~nitrogen~~activities ~~frac~~through toour ~~test~~subsidiary. ~~the~~The ~~formations~~cost of that litigation was substantial. We leased mineral rights in Montana and ~~determine~~North ~~whether~~Dakota but the ~~well~~last ~~contains~~of ~~economic~~those ~~quantities~~leases expired under their terms in 2012 with the exception of the ~~natural~~BLM ~~gas~~contested lease. Management believes its efforts to obtain funding will allow the Company to move forward to explore and ~~can~~develop beprofitable ~~put~~oil ~~into~~and ~~production.~~gas Ifoperations, wealthough ~~are~~there ~~successful~~is inno assurance these efforts, wewill be successful. These ~~plan~~situations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue ~~with~~as ~~eight~~a ~~step~~going ~~out~~concern. ~~wells~~Our ~~and~~consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to ~~unitize~~reflect the ~~entire~~possible ~~structure~~future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or amounts and classification of liabilities, which may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

~~Under~~At aSeptember 30, ~~past~~2012, ~~agreement~~we ~~with~~have approximately ~~F-Cross~~$6,000 ~~the Federal~~in ~~1-19~~cash ~~well,~~compared ~~was~~to ~~drilled~~approximately on$7,000 ~~our~~at ~~Valley County~~December 31, ~~Montana~~2011. ~~Leases~~Our tocurrent ~~test~~liabilities aexceed ~~shallow~~our ~~gas~~current ~~prospect~~assets ~~during~~by ~~October~~approximately ~~2007.~~$1,491,000 ~~The~~at ~~well~~September 30, ~~reached~~2012. aWe ~~total~~suspended ~~depth~~payments ofto 1our directors,~~126~~ ~~feet~~general legal counsel, and ~~confirmed~~employee since the ~~structural~~second ~~high~~quarter ~~that~~of ~~was~~2007 ~~targeted~~through September 30, 2012, and ~~had~~have ~~gas~~accrued ~~shows~~$1,498,000 in ~~two~~expenses ~~zones. Casing~~as ~~was~~of ~~run~~September 30, ~~into~~2012. ~~the~~We ~~hole~~expect ~~and~~to ~~the~~continue ~~Company~~to ~~engaged~~suspend inpayments ~~three~~to ~~stages~~most of ~~completion~~these ~~operations,~~parties ~~including~~indefinitely ~~stimulation~~until sufficient offunding ~~the~~can ~~well,~~be asecured ~~common~~to ~~procedure~~resume inexploration ~~completing~~operations ~~oil~~ and ~~gas~~cover ~~wells~~normal operating expenses.

Capital Resources

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

~~The~~On ~~Company~~May 20, ~~was~~2011, ~~unable to determine by~~ the ~~Federal~~Company ~~1-19~~entered ~~well~~into ~~whether~~an ~~the~~agreement ~~target formations~~with ~~contain~~Robert ~~economic~~J. ~~quantities~~Angerer, ofSr., ~~gas because drilling damage in~~ for the ~~well~~sale ~~prevented the testing~~ of ~~either~~857,142 ofrestricted ~~the~~and ~~prospective~~unregistered ~~formations~~shares atof ~~this~~common ~~location.~~stock ~~Completion~~of ~~efforts found that~~ the ~~Eagle~~Company ~~formation~~for ~~was~~$60,000, ~~damaged~~in byorder ~~the initial drilling and the formation was not able~~ to becover ~~tested~~certain ~~from~~Company ~~this~~expenses. ~~well~~Mr. Angerer ~~Further~~also ~~drilling~~exercised ~~into~~an ~~the~~option ~~Eagle~~under ~~formation during completion did not yield gas like~~ the ~~gas~~agreement ~~show~~for ~~seen~~142,857 ~~from~~shares ~~the upper part~~ of ~~the~~common ~~formation~~stock ~~that was damaged~~for $10,000. The ~~Judith~~Company ~~River~~plans ~~formation, a secondary target, was damaged by drilling fluids lost into the formation while drilling through it~~ to ~~get~~issue ~~to the Eagle formation, the primary target~~Mr. Angerer ~~Future~~a ~~wells~~total toof ~~test~~999,999 ~~this~~restricted ~~structure~~and ~~will~~unregistered ~~incorporate~~shares ~~the~~of ~~information~~common ~~obtained~~stock ~~from~~for ~~these~~investments ~~wells~~made ~~to prevent~~under ~~that~~this ~~damage~~agreement. ~~from~~This ~~occurring~~agreement ~~again~~has ~~in other locations on the structure~~concluded.

InThen ~~North~~in ~~Dakota~~October 2011, wein ~~control~~order to fund immediate cash needs at that time, the ~~working~~Company entered into another agreement with Robert J. Angerer, ~~interest~~Sr., onfor ~~approximately~~an ~~400~~immediate ~~net~~infusion ~~acres~~of in$30,000 ~~Slope~~cash ~~County~~and the commitment to spend $130,000 ~~under~~in ~~which~~operational ~~lies~~costs ~~our~~to ~~Red~~complete ~~River~~the ~~prospect~~Federal 1-19A well. ~~Other~~The ~~leases~~agreement ~~that~~also weprovided ~~previously~~options ~~held~~for inMr. Angerer ~~North~~to ~~Dakota~~provide ~~expired~~additional ~~during~~funding. In return, the Company ~~first~~will ~~quarter~~issue 4,444,444 restricted and unregistered shares of ~~2011~~common stock to Mr. Angerer. Under this agreement, ~~because~~Mr. Angerer weprovided ~~were~~a ~~not~~total ~~able~~of to$90,000 ~~raise~~in cash to the ~~funds~~Company; ~~needed~~he toprovided $55,000 in 2011 and an additional $35,000 ~~cover~~through August of 2012. Mr. Angerer also paid directly $70,000 for expenses related to the ~~cost~~Federal of1-19A ~~drilling~~well. ~~exploratory~~The ~~wells~~Company plans to ~~test~~issue Mr. Angerer a total of 4,444,444 restricted and unregistered shares of common stock for investments made under this agreement. The agreement was completed and all other options under the ~~Lodgepole~~agreement ~~Reef~~expired. ~~prospects~~During on2011, 3,472,221 shares have been reflected as issued under the ~~leases~~October 2011 agreement; and at September 30, 2012, 972,223 shares remain to be issued to Mr. Angerer.

IfIn ~~our~~September ~~funding~~2012, ~~efforts~~the ~~are successful,~~Company weentered ~~plan~~into toa ~~drill~~new oragreement ~~participate~~with inRobert asJ. ~~many~~Angerer, asSr., ~~eight~~to provide ~~exploratory~~additional ~~wells~~funding onin ~~the~~return ~~Montana~~for ~~leases.~~shares ~~However,~~of ~~the~~restricted ~~number~~and unregistered shares of ~~wells~~common ~~that~~stock weof ~~drill~~the ~~and~~Company ~~their~~at ~~cost~~$.03 ~~will~~per beshare. ~~subject~~Mr. Angerer agreed to ~~various~~provide ~~factors~~up to $1,000,000 ~~including~~to ~~whether~~perform ora ~~not~~nitrogen wefracturing ~~can~~operation ~~obtain~~on ~~sufficient~~the Federal ~~funding~~1-19A well, to ~~carry~~abandon ~~out~~two ~~the~~existing ~~planned~~wells, ~~exploratory~~to ~~drilling~~pay existing liabilities, ~~the~~and ~~availability~~to ofallow ~~drilling~~the ~~rigs~~Company ~~that~~to wecure ~~can~~its ~~hire~~delinquent legal and ~~whether~~regulatory wefilings. ~~drill~~In ~~alone~~conjunction orwith this agreement, the Company entered into a separation agreement with ~~other~~Phillip ~~participants~~W. Ware. InMr. Angerer ~~addition,~~completed wethe ~~could~~nitrogen ~~reduce~~fracturing operation on the ~~number~~Federal 1-19A well at a cost of ~~wells~~$171,501 ~~that~~in we2012. ~~drill~~The ifCompany ~~oil~~plans to issue 3,564,705 shares of restricted and ~~natural~~unregistered ~~gas prices~~shares ~~were~~of common stock to ~~decline~~Mr. Angerer ~~significantly~~for 2012. WeIn ~~expect~~2013, ~~the~~Mr. Angerer ~~cost~~paid of$60,000 ~~drilling~~to the ~~sixteen~~Company ~~wells~~in order for the Company to ~~depend~~pay ~~upon~~legal ~~many~~compliance ~~factors~~costs and paid $343,988 ~~including~~of ~~those~~existing ~~above~~liabilities of the Company. In February 2014, ~~which~~Mr. Angerer ~~may~~paid ~~affect~~$30,500 for regulatory compliance costs on behalf of the ~~cost~~Company. The Company plans to issue Mr. Angerer 15,834,199 shares of ~~operations~~restricted and ~~whether~~unregistered ~~and~~shares toof ~~what~~common ~~extent~~stock ~~others~~in ~~participate~~exchange ~~with~~for the funds paid into the Company. during 2013 and through June 30, 2014, pursuant to the 2012 agreement.

~~Liquidity~~As of the date of this report, the Company plans to issue Mr. Angerer 24,843,347 shares of restricted and unregistered shares of common stock in exchange for the funds paid into the Company through the various agreements described above that were entered and performed from 2011 through June ~~Capital Resources~~30, 2014.

Liquidity

As more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, we have no recurring revenues, have experienced recurring losses and have a deficit accumulated during the development stage. We, along with various other related parties, settled several lawsuits in 2005, which were filed by the Company, our subsidiary Coastal Petroleum Company and other related parties against the State of Florida. All of these lawsuits were related to the State’s actions limiting our ability to commence development activities through our subsidiary. The cost of that litigation was substantial. Management believes its current cash position, and its active efforts to obtain funding will allow the Company to move forward to explore and develop profitable oil and gas operations, although there is no assurance these efforts will be successful. These situations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or amounts and classification of liabilities, which may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

The Company had $9,000 available cash, excluding certificate of deposits pledged for drilling permits, at September 30, 2011, and had $17,000 at December 31, 2010. Our current liabilities exceed our current assets by approximately $1,417,000 at September 30, 2011. We have suspended payments to our directors, general legal counsel, and employee since the second quarter of 2007 and have accrued approximately $1,400,000 in expenses as of September 30, 2011. We expect to continue to suspend payments to these parties until sufficient funding can be secured to resume exploration operations and cover normal operating expenses. In May 2011, we received $52,000 in cash from Mr. Angerer and we received $8,000 in July 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 857,142 shares of common stock and an option to further fund the Company in the amount of $240,000 to complete the Federal 1-19A well. We paid $27,398 in annual lease payments that were due in June 2011.

In August 2011, Mr. Angerer exercised an option for 142,857 shares of common stock for $10,000. On October 17, 2011, we received $30,000 cash and the commitment to spend $130,000 in operational costs to complete the Federal 1-19A well in Valley County, Montana through an agreement with Mr. Angerer in exchange for 4,444,444 shares of common stock. Under the Agreement, Mr. Angerer also has two future options; the first is to invest an additional $25,000 to pay lease rentals due on November 1, 2011, in exchange for 694,444 shares of common stock and the second is to invest $815,000 on or before January 31, 2012, in exchange for 22,638,888 shares of common stock, to provide funds for exploration. We received $25,000 for the first option from Mr. Angerer on October 26, 2011.

Capital Resources

During 2010, the Company sold 22,725,000 shares of common stock for $770,000 in cash and settlement of $217,850 in liabilities. We drilled a test well on Coastal’s Starbuck East shallow gas prospect in Valley County, Montana and hired a consultant to obtain additional drilling permits for approximately $492,000. We also acquired four additional high-graded Lodgepole Reef prospects in North Dakota for $20,000 which leases subsequently expired in the first quarter of 2011.

In North Dakota, we control the working interest on approximately 400 net acres in Slope County covering a Red River oil prospect. We had originally intended to bring in others to share the risk and investment in wells it drilled in North Dakota until the Company is in a stronger financial position, but are now actively seeking funding to allow us to begin such exploration on our own.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, 2011

ITEM 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

If our funding efforts are successful, we plan to drill or participate in as many as eight exploratory wells on the Montana leases. However, the number of wells that we drill in 2011 and their cost will be subject to various factors, including whether or not we can obtain sufficient funding to carry out the drilling, the availability of drilling rigs that we can hire and whether we drill alone or with other participants. In addition, we could reduce the number of wells that we drill if oil and natural gas prices were to decline significantly. We expect the cost of drilling the sixteen wells to depend upon many factors, including those above, which may affect the cost of operations and whether and to what extent others participate with the Company.

We expect to continue to participate with others or to obtain sufficient funding to allow the Company to drill additional wells both in Montana and North Dakota.

Results of Operations

Three months ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012 vs. September 30, ~~2010~~2011

We conducted limited operational activities in the third quarter of ~~2011~~2012 and did not conduct drilling activities in the third quarter of ~~2010~~2012 or 2011. ~~Our~~We ~~efforts~~suspended ~~have~~substantially ~~primarily~~all ~~been~~of ~~focused~~our onefforts ~~soliciting~~since ~~funding or~~2011 ~~potential~~due ~~partners~~to ~~for~~lack ~~our~~of ~~Drilling Program~~funding. Our expenses are primarily administrative and our ~~2011~~2012 expenses remained consistent with ~~2010~~2011 amounts.

Nine months ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012 vs. September 30, ~~2010~~2011

We conducted limited operational activities in ~~2011~~the ~~and~~first ~~capitalized~~three ~~$34,000~~quarters onof ~~such~~2012 ~~activities,~~and ~~but~~ did not conduct drilling activities in ~~2011.~~the ~~Our~~first ~~efforts~~three quarters ~~have~~of ~~primarily~~2012 ~~been~~or ~~focused~~2011. onWe ~~soliciting~~suspended ~~funding~~substantially orall ~~potential~~of ~~partners~~our ~~for~~efforts ~~our~~since ~~Drilling~~2011 ~~Program~~due to lack of funding. Our expenses are primarily administrative and our ~~2011~~2012 expenses remained consistent with ~~2010~~2011 amounts.

ITEM 3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The Company does not have any significant exposure to market risk as there were no investments in marketable securities at September 30, ~~2011~~2012.

16ITEM 4 Controls and Procedures

a.	Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.

We maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on his evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15.

Changes in internal controls. The Company made no changes in its internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or which is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 4 Controls and Procedures (Continued)

ac. ~~Management’s~~Limitations ~~annual~~on ~~report~~the onEffectiveness of Controls Our management, including our Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control ~~over~~system, ~~financial~~no ~~reporting~~matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

b. Changes in internal controls. The Company made no changes in its internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or which is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

c. Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls Our management, including our Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

1716

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

ITEM 1

Legal Proceedings

~~During~~The ~~the~~Company ~~third~~is ~~quarter~~aware of ~~2009, the Company was involved as~~ a ~~defendant in a case entitled American Pipe & Supply Co. v. Coastal Petroleum Company, et.al, Cause No. DV 08-63, in the Montana Seventeenth Judicial District Court in Valley County, Montana. This~~ claim isof inlien ~~relation~~relating to the ~~failure~~Evaline ofwell ~~our~~(for ~~farmee,~~approximately ~~F-Cross~~$10, ~~who has filed for bankruptcy~~400), toand ~~pay~~another ~~for~~relating ~~pipe purchased from the Plaintiff~~ to ~~drill~~ the ~~State~~Federal 71-1619A well. ~~The claim seeks relief against Coastal Petroleum: to foreclose an oil and gas lien on the single part of one lease involved which is held in Coastal Petroleum’s name; and damages~~ (for ~~breach~~ ofapproximately ~~contract and quantum meruit in the amount of about~~ $8033,~~000~~200). ~~American~~We ~~Pipe~~have ~~did~~also ~~not~~stipulated ~~proceed~~ with ~~its~~surveyors ~~case~~in ~~and~~North onDakota ~~October 5,~~for ~~2011,~~approximately ~~the case was dismissed. During the second quarter of 2011~~$40,000 ~~the~~in ~~Company~~order ~~became aware of an additional claim of lien that has been filed by another party relating~~ to ~~the~~avoid ~~State~~suit ~~7-16~~over ~~well~~work ~~seeking similar relief in the amount of $295,000~~conducted there.

In ~~addition, during~~ the second quarter of 2011, the drilling contractor on the Company’s ~~became~~Federal ~~aware~~1-19A well in Montana, filed suit against Coastal Petroleum in Houston, Texas, for breach of ~~three~~contract ~~other~~seeking ~~claims~~damages of ~~liens~~approximately ~~that~~$98,000. ~~have~~Coastal ~~been~~Petroleum filed ~~relating~~a motion to dismiss the ~~Evaline~~claim (for ~~approximately~~lack ~~$10,400),~~of ~~Federal~~jurisdiction ~~1-19~~and ~~(for~~improper ~~approximately~~venue. ~~$113,800)~~The ~~and~~case ~~Federal~~was ~~1-19A~~voluntarily ~~(for~~nonsuited ~~approximately~~and ~~$33~~refiled in Montana. Ultimately,~~200)~~ ~~wells~~the ~~all~~case ofwas ~~which~~settled ~~seek~~for ~~similar~~$70,000, ~~relief~~paid asfor toby Mr. Angerer, Sr. and the ~~respective~~case ~~wells~~was resolved.

~~Also~~As inof the ~~second~~date ~~quarter~~ of this ~~2011~~report, ~~the~~to ~~drilling contractor on~~ the ~~Company’s~~best ~~Federal~~knowledge ~~1-19A well in Montana, filed suit against Coastal Petroleum in Houston, Texas, for breach~~ of ~~contract~~our ~~seeking damages of approximately $98~~management,~~000.~~ ~~Coastal~~there ~~Petroleum~~are ~~has~~no ~~retained~~material ~~counsel~~litigation tomatters ~~have~~pending ~~the~~or ~~claim~~threatened ~~dismissed~~against ~~for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue~~us.

Except as described in the preceding paragraphs, to the best knowledge of our management, there are no material litigation matters pending or threatened against us.

ITEM 5

Other Information

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, provides special rules for distributions received by U.S. holders on stock of a passive foreign investment company (PFIC), as well as amounts received from the sale or other disposition of PFIC stock. Under the PFIC rules, a non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either (1) at least 75 percent of its gross income is passive income or (2) at least 50 percent of the gross value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income.

The Company believes that it may be classified as a PFIC for the year ~~2010~~2012, because it ~~derived~~derives the majority of its gross income ~~in 2010~~ from the relatively small amount of interest the Company ~~received~~receives. The determination of whether the Company will be considered a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes is an annual determination that cannot be made until the close of the fiscal year. Also, how the Company was classified in prior years does not affect how it will be classified in the current year.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

September 30, 2012

ITEM 5

Other Information (Continued)

amount of the gain on the sale or the amount of the distribution, as the case may be, to each day in the U.S. shareholder’s holding period. To the extent that the amount is allocated to a year, other than the year of the disposition or distribution, in which the corporation was treated as a PFIC with respect to the U.S. holder, the income will be taxed as ordinary income at the highest rate in effect for that year, plus an interest charge.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

If, for any taxable year, the Company’s passive income or assets that produce passive income exceed levels provided by U.S. law, the Company would be a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For the years 1987 through 2004 and in 2006, Coastal Caribbean’s passive income and assets that produce passive income exceeded those levels and for those years Coastal Caribbean constituted a PFIC. If Coastal Caribbean is a PFIC for any taxable year, then the Company’s U.S. shareholders potentially would be subject to adverse U.S. tax consequences of holding and disposing of shares of our common stock for that year and for future tax years. Any gain from the sale of, and certain distributions with respect to, shares of the Company’s common stock, would cause a U.S. holder to become liable for U.S. federal income tax under section 1291 of the Internal Revenue Code (the interest charge regime). The tax is computed by allocating the amount of the gain on the sale or the amount of the distribution, as the case may be, to each day in the U.S. shareholder’s holding period. To the extent that the amount is allocated to a year, other than the year of the disposition or distribution, in which the corporation was treated as a PFIC with respect to the U.S. holder, the income will be taxed as ordinary income at the highest rate in effect for that year, plus an interest charge.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 6

Exhibits

31.1		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) byof ~~Phillip~~the W.Securities ~~Ware~~Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 byof ~~Phillip~~the W.Sarbanes-Oxley ~~Ware~~Act of 2002.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

September 30, ~~2011~~2012

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.
	Registrant
Date: November 14, 2011		By	/s/ Phillip W. Ware
Date: July 24, 2014	By	/s/ Robert J. Angerer, Sr.
			Phillip W. Ware
		Robert J. Angerer, Sr.
		Chief Executive Officer,	~~Chief Executive Officer,~~
			President and Treasurer
		President and Principal Financial Officer

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS LTD