3Table of Contents

4Table of Contents

TheTable Fund commenced the offering of Units on February 17, 2009. The initial offering terminated on March 31, 2009, and the Fund commenced operations on April 1, 2009. The continuing offering period commenced at the termination of the initial offering period and is ongoing. For the year ended December 31, 2012, subscriptions totaling $3,810,089 for the Fund as a whole, $2,312,559 in Series A-1, $470,972 in Series A-2, $375,669 in Series B-1, and $650,889 in Series B-2 had been accepted and redemptions over the same period totaled $5,333,399 for the Fund as a whole, $2,151,712 in Series A-1, $367,739 in Series A-2, $1,942,747 in Series B-1, and $871,201 in Series B-2. Contents

InTable July, the Fund’s trading strategies returned to positive territory as capital preservation was the primary goal for investors. Unsustainable debt in Spain had government officials considering all options including bailout, default, or even leaving the euro while Greece’s troika of creditors found the country to be falling short of budgetary targets required for their 240 billion euro rescue package. China’s growth slowed to 7.6%, a three-year low, prompting two rate cuts so far this year. Investors seeking refuge redirected cash into safe haven debt instruments, pushing yields to record lows. In the U.S., the Great Plains growing region is facing the worst drought since 1956. Less than one-third of the U.S. corn and soybean crop is in good condition, propelling both markets to all-time highs. The Fund’s short-term strategies produced mixed results with gains in interest rates and losses in metals. The Fund’s equity positions underperformed in July. Volatility persisted as the overhang of European economic difficulties and slowing global growth continued to weigh on markets. Spain’s Ibex35 (-4.0%) fell to its lowest point since 2003 while the Italian Mib40 (-3.0%) reached an all-time low, prompting regulators to reinstitute short-sale bans in both countries. In the U.S., the Dow (+1.1%) was supported by a drop in jobless claims and encouraging durable goods data. In China (+1.1%), slowing growth prompted a second cut to its key lending rate while Japanese stocks (-3.7%) lost ground, pressured by the yen’s appreciation. The Fund’s bond positions were profitable in July as investors poured money into safe-haven debt instruments despite record low yields. Spain remains at the center of Europe’s economic woes with 10-year bond yields reaching 7.75%, a euro-era record. In response, investment into German bunds increased, which twice touched a record low yield of 1.127%. British Long Gilts (+2.3%) also benefited from safe-haven inflows as Bank of England officials announced another 50 billion pounds in quantitative easing. Robust demand for the safety of U.S. debt drove 10-year and 30-year yields to record lows as well, at 1.379% and 2.4405% respectively. The Fund’s allocation to short-term interest rates generated positive returns in July as markets welcomed action from the ECB while looking to the Fed to follow suit. The ECB cut its benchmark lending rate to a record low of 0.75% and its overnight deposit rate to 0% in an effort to stave off recession. Speculation for further cuts drove the Euribor rate to a record low of 0.401%. Markets expected that the Fed may reconsider cutting the IOER (interest on excess reserves) from 0.25% in order to incentivize banks to reallocate reserves away from the Fed and into higher yielding areas. Anticipation for an IOER cut, coordinated with additional Fed tools, lifted Eurodollar futures. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced moderate gains in July as global economic uncertainly drove money flows into safe-haven sovereign currencies at the expense of the euro. A permanent solution to the debt issues that plague southern Europe remained elusive, pushing the euro to a two-year low versus the U.S. dollar ($1.2043/euro). The yen maintained its favored status, up 7.2% since mid-March, while the Aussie dollar (+2.9%) also remained strong. The Canadian dollar (+1.5%) approached parity with its U.S. counterpart on relative economic outperformance. The Fund’s strategies produced strong returns in grains in July as the U.S. Midwest is experiencing its worst drought in nearly six decades. As of July 30th, only 25% of the crop was in good condition, the lowest since 1988. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) lowered yield estimates 12% to and was expected to make another significant cut in August. December corn gained 27% in July and is 59% higher since mid-June. It is likely that later maturing soybeans will be equally affected by the drought. The most active corn and soybean contracts posted all-time highs of $8.20 1/2 and 16.91 1/2 a bushel respectively. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector underperformed in July as COMEX gold continued to trade in a narrow range and global instability hurt base metal demand. LME warehouse zinc (-1.9%) supplies surpassed one million metric tons for the first time in 17 years while copper imports to China fell to a 10-month low. COMEX copper declined 2.1%, closing at $341.75/lb. Gold was confined to a 4.6% range as traders awaited signals from central bankers towards easing policies. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector yielded disappointing results in July as crude oil mounted a rally from the dramatic decline over the last several months. Short-covering helped to start prices moving up early in the month as speculators sought to lock in gains. Rising political tensions between Israel and Iran helped to reinforce the rally with unrest in Syria increasing the likelihood of a near-term supply disruption. RBOB gasoline (+6.9%) and heating oil (+5.4%) moved up sharply in step with crude, in spite of ample supplies. Natural gas (+13.6%) rebounded further from lows as hot weather drove up cooling demand from utilities. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position posted modest gains in July as gold remained bound to its established trading range, crossing the $1,600/troy oz. level ten times since early May. Forecasters disagree on market direction with bulls anticipating central bankers being forced to implement further monetary easing while bears cite waning interest and preference for the U.S. dollar. Contents

ForTable the second quarter of 2012, the most profitable market group overall was the bonds sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the grains sector. Contents

13Table of Contents

NetTable results for the year ended December 31, 2011, were a loss of 8.1% in net asset value for Series B-1 and a loss of 6.4% in net asset value for Series B-2. In this period, Series B experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $593,123. This net decrease consisted of interest income of $5,657, trading gains of $744,697 and total expenses of $1,343,477. Expenses included $287,138 in management fees, $95,710 in operating expenses, $156,375 in selling commissions, $286,128 in brokerage commissions, $405,490 in incentive fees, $101,521 attributable to the MF Global reserve and $11,115 in other expenses. At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the net asset value per Unit of Series B-1 was $1,241.61 and $1,351.21, respectively, and of Series B-2 was $1,300.90 and $1,389.80, respectively. Contents

InTable July, the Fund’s trading strategies bounced back to produce strong returns as global contagion fears resulted in strong moves for safe haven assets at the expense of risk. The Fund’s short-term strategies contributed positively to overall performance as gains in bonds and stocks offset small losses in currencies, metals and energies. The strongest performing sectors on the month were bonds, metals and currencies, with bonds having the most substantial returns. Meanwhile, stock indices and grains produced moderate losses. The Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold position produced substantial positive returns in July as the debt crisis in Europe and the U.S. accelerated. The Fund’s bond positions performed well in July on speculation that there was an increasing likelihood of a debt-related slowdown in Europe and the U.S. German bunds rallied on demand for safe haven assets as Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) figures remained muted despite factory orders and exports easily surpassing expectations. The health of major banks in Italy and Spain came into question forcing Spanish and Italian yield to soar amid increasing loan losses for private banks. In the U.S., the combination of a disappointing early month jobs report and debt ceiling related slowdown fears supported the steady trend higher. Allocations to metals produced positive results on the month as policy maker deadlocks in Europe and the U.S. drove investors to the perceived safety of gold and silver. December gold finished 8.4% higher, surpassing the $1,637 level, while September silver added 15.2% to finish just over the $40 mark. London copper added 4.5% due to strong U.S. corporate earnings and a 20% increase in Chinese refined copper imports following May’s domestic stocks drawdown. An early month Chinese rate hike and a somewhat disappointing GDP report did little to slow the advance. The Fund’s currency market positions yielded positive results in July as early U.S. dollar strength reversed mid-month, giving way to concern over the risks associated with a failure to raise the U.S. debt ceiling. The first half of the month saw significant euro weakness amid conflicting signals from various euro-zone officials as to the ultimate fate of their heavily indebted members and the monetary union itself. The U.S. dollar rallied over 2% while the euro gave up over 3% amid Greek default talk and heightening Italian solvency concerns. From there, the U.S dollar reversed as global investors sought protection from a potential U.S. default as debt ceiling negotiations faltered. The Fund yielded slightly negative results in the stock indices sector in July as global markets continued to retrace from spring highs amid debt worries. Grain positions also experienced moderate losses in July on weather related yield uncertainty. Contents

RecentlyTable Issuedof Accounting Pronouncements Contents

ItemTable 9.of Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.Contents

PARTTable IIIof Contents

TheTable Board of Directors of Superfund Capital Management, in its capacity as the audit committee for the Fund, has determined that Gizela Benedek qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations for the SEC. She is not independent of management. Contents

AuditTable Feesof Contents

TheTable Board of Directors and Audit Committee of Superfund Capital Management approved all of the services described above. The Board of Directors and Audit Committee have determined that the payments made to its independent accountants for these services are compatible with maintaining such auditors’ independence. The Board of Directors pre-approves all audit and non-audit services and all engagement fees and terms. Contents

*Table XBRL information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is not subject to liability under those sections, is not part of any registration statement or prospectus to which it relates and is not incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference into any registration statement, prospectus or other document.Contents

EXHIBITTable 13.01of Contents

MarchTable 26,of 2013 Contents

29Table of Contents

SeeTable accompanyingof notes to financial statements. Contents

*Table Dueof to roundingContents

SeeTable accompanyingof notes to financial statements. Contents

35Table of Contents

CONDENSEDTable SCHEDULEof OF INVESTMENTS Contents

SUPERFUNDTable GOLD,of L.P. - SERIES A Contents

38Table of Contents

39Table of Contents

SUPERFUNDTable GOLD,of L.P. - SERIES B Contents

CONDENSEDTable SCHEDULEof OF INVESTMENTS Contents

SUPERFUNDTable GOLD,of L.P. - SERIES B Contents

44Table of Contents

46Table of Contents

AssetsTable and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the period end exchange rates. Purchases and sales of investments and income and expenses that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts on the transaction date. Adjustments arising from foreign currency transactions are reflected in the statements of operations. Contents

InTable December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. GAAP more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of assets and liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. New disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The General Partner is evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-11 on the financial statements and disclosures. Contents

U.S.Table Government Securities. The Fund’s only market exposure in instruments held other than for trading is in its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio. As the Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio, which approximates fair value, this portfolio is classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Contents

SuperfundTable Gold,of L.P. Contents

TheTable Fund follows ASC 815, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“ASC 815”). ASC 815 is intended to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments by requiring enhanced disclosure that enables investors to understand how and why an entity uses derivatives, how derivatives are accounted for, and how derivative instruments affect an entity’s results of operations and financial position. Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-53764

SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE		98-0574019 (Series A); 98-0574020 (Series B)
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

SUPERFUND OFFICE BUILDING

P.O. BOX 1479

GRAND ANSE

ST. GEORGE’S, GRENADA

WEST INDIES

Not applicable

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (473) 439-2418

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Units of Limited Partnership Interest

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨ x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Prospectus dated May 111, ~~2012~~2013, included within the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Superfund Gold, L.P.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-179534), is incorporated by reference into Item 1 and Item 5.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I	3
ITEM 1. BUSINESS	3	3
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	4	4
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	4	4
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES	4	4
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	4	4
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	4	4
PART II	4
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	4	4
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	6	6
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	6	6
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	14	23
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	14	23
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	14	23
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	14	23
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION	15	24
PART III	15
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	15	24
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	16	26
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	17	26
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	17	26
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	17	26
PART IV	18
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	18	27
SIGNATURES	59	68
EXHIBIT INDEX	60	69
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Superfund Gold, L.P., (the “Fund”) is a limited partnership which was organized on March 19, 2008 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended. In accordance with the Third Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Limited Partnership Agreement”) under which it operates, the Fund offers two series of limited partnership units (the “Units”): Series A and Series B (each, a “Series”). Series B implements the Fund’s futures and forward trading program at a leverage level equal to approximately 1.5 times that implemented on behalf of Series A. Over the long term (periods of several years), the targeted average ratio of margin to equity for Series A is approximately 20% and approximately 30% for Series B. The leverage with which each of the Series is traded is the only difference between the Series.

Within each Series, Units are issued in two sub-Series (each a “Sub-Series”). Sub-Series within a Series are not ~~managed~~ managed differently. Rather Series A-1 Units and Series B-1 Units are subject to selling commissions. Series A-2 Units and Series B-2 Units are not subject to selling commissions but are available exclusively to: (i) limited partners of the ~~Fund~~ Fund (“Limited Partners”) participating in selling agent asset-based or fixed-fee investment programs or a registered investment adviser’s asset-based fee or fixed-fee advisory program through which an investment adviser recommends a portfolio allocation to the Fund and for which Superfund USA, LLC (“Superfund USA”) serves as selling agent, (ii) investors who purchased the Units through Superfund USA or an affiliated broker and who are commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), and (iii) investors who have paid the maximum selling commission on their Series A-1 or Series B-1 Units (by redesignation of such Units as Series A-2 Units or Series B-2 Units as described herein). The foregoing eligibility requirements and selling commissions are the only differences between the Sub-Series within a Series.

The Fund operates as a commodity investment pool, whose purpose is speculative trading in the United States (“U.S.”) and international futures and forwards markets. Specifically, the Fund trades a portfolio of more than 120 futures and forward contracts using a fully-automated, proprietary, computerized trading system. The Fund also seeks to maintain an investment in gold approximately equal to the total capital of each Series, as of the beginning of each month and as periodically readjusted during each month to reflect the profits and losses from the Series’ futures and forward trading activities during the month. The gold investment is intended to delink each Series’ net asset value, which is determined in U.S. dollars, from the value of the U.S. dollar relative to gold, effectively denominating the Series’ net asset value in terms of gold. The general partner and trading manager of the Fund is Superfund Capital Management, Inc. (“Superfund Capital Management”), a Grenada corporation. Superfund Capital Management is registered as a commodity pool operator with the CFTC and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”) and is therefore subject to the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, the regulations of the CFTC, and the rules of the NFA.

Narrative Description of the Business

A description of the business of the Fund, including trading approach, rights and obligations of the Limited Partners, and compensation arrangements is contained in the Fund’s current Prospectus dated May 111, ~~2012~~2013, under “Summary,” “The Risks You Face,” “Superfund Capital Management, Inc.,” “Conflicts of Interest,” and “Charges” and such description is incorporated herein by reference from the Prospectus.

The Fund conducts its business in one industry segment: the speculative trading of futures and forward contracts and options thereon. The Fund is a market participant in the “managed futures” industry. Market participants include all types of investors, such as corporations, employee benefit plans, individuals and foreign investors. Service providers of the managed futures industry include (a) pool operators, which conduct and manage all aspects of trading funds, such as the Fund, (b) trading advisors, which make the specific trading decisions, and (c) commodity brokers, which execute and clear the trades pursuant to the instructions of the trading advisor. The Fund has no employees and does not engage in the sale of goods or services.

The Fund trades on domestic and international exchanges in more than 120 futures and forward contracts. The Fund also seeks to maintain a long position in gold futures contracts approximately equal to the total capital of each Series as of the beginning of each month and as periodically readjusted during each month to reflect profits and losses from the Series’ futures and forward trading activities during the month. The gold position is intended to delink each Series’ net asset value, which is determined in U.S. dollars, from the value of the U.S. dollar relative to gold, essentially denominating the Series’ net asset value in terms of gold. Trading decisions are made using a fully-automated, proprietary, computerized trading system which emphasizes instruments with low correlation and high liquidity for order execution. The particular contracts traded by the Fund will vary from time to time.

The Fund may, in the future, experience increased competition for the commodity futures and other contracts in which it trades. Superfund Capital Management will recommend similar or identical trades for other accounts under its management. Such competition may also increase due to what Superfund Capital Management believes is an increasing utilization of computerized trading methods similar in general to those used by Superfund Capital Management.

~~Under~~3 the Commodity Exchange Act, commodity exchanges and commodity futures trading are subject to regulation by the CFTC. The NFA, a registered futures association under the Commodity Exchange Act, is the only non-exchange self-regulatory

~~Table~~Under the Commodity Exchange Act, commodity exchanges and commodity futures trading are subject to regulation by the CFTC. The NFA, a registered futures association under the Commodity Exchange Act, is the only non-exchange self-regulatory organization for commodity industry professionals. The CFTC has delegated to the NFA responsibility for the registration of ~~Contents~~“commodity trading advisors,” “commodity pool operators,” “futures commission merchants,” “introducing brokers” and their respective associated persons and “floor brokers.” The Commodity Exchange Act requires “commodity pool operators” such as Superfund Capital Management and commodity brokers or “futures commission merchants” such as the Fund’s commodity brokers to be registered and to comply with various reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Superfund Capital Management and the Fund’s commodity brokers are members of the NFA. The CFTC may suspend a commodity pool operator’s registration if it finds that its trading practices tend to disrupt orderly market conditions, or as the result of violations of the Commodity Exchange Act or rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. In the event Superfund Capital Management’s registration as a commodity pool operator was terminated or suspended, Superfund Capital Management would be unable to continue to manage its business or the Fund. Should Superfund Capital Management’s registration be suspended, termination of the Fund might result.

~~organization~~In ~~for~~addition ~~commodity~~to ~~industry~~such ~~professionals.~~registration ~~The~~requirements, the CFTC ~~has~~and ~~delegated~~certain tocommodity ~~the~~exchanges ~~NFA~~have ~~responsibility~~established ~~for~~limits on the ~~registration~~maximum ofnet ~~“commodity~~long ~~trading~~and net ~~advisors,”~~short ~~“commodity~~positions ~~pool operators,”~~which ~~“futures~~any ~~commission merchants~~person,” ~~“introducing~~including ~~brokers”~~the ~~and~~Fund, ~~their~~may ~~respective~~hold ~~associated~~or ~~persons~~control ~~and~~in ~~“floor~~certain ~~brokers~~futures contracts.” ~~The~~Most ~~Commodity~~exchanges ~~Exchange~~also ~~Act~~limit ~~requires~~the ~~“commodity~~maximum ~~pool~~changes ~~operators”~~in ~~such~~futures ~~as Superfund~~contract ~~Capital~~prices ~~Management~~that ~~and~~may ~~commodity~~occur ~~brokers~~during ora ~~“futures~~single ~~commission~~trading ~~merchants”~~day. ~~such~~In asNovember 2011, the CFTC ~~Fund’s~~adopted ~~commodity~~a ~~brokers~~new toposition belimits ~~registered~~regime ~~and~~for to28 ~~comply~~so-called ~~with~~“exempt” ~~various~~(i.e., ~~reporting~~metals and ~~recordkeeping~~energy) ~~requirements.~~and ~~Superfund~~agricultural ~~Capital Management~~futures and ~~the~~options ~~Fund’s~~contracts ~~commodity~~and ~~brokers~~their ~~are~~economically ~~members~~equivalent ofswap ~~the~~contracts. ~~NFA~~A U.S. ~~The~~District ~~CFTC~~Court ~~may~~vacated ~~suspend~~the anew ~~commodity~~position limits ~~pool~~regime, ~~operator’s~~but ~~registration~~the ifCFTC itproposed ~~finds~~a ~~that~~new ~~its~~set ~~trading~~of ~~practices~~speculative ~~tend~~position torules ~~disrupt~~which ~~orderly~~are ~~market~~not ~~conditions,~~yet finalized or aseffective. ~~the~~All ~~result~~accounts ~~of violations~~controlled ofby Superfund Capital Management, including the ~~Commodity~~accounts ~~Exchange~~of ~~Act~~each orSeries, ~~rules~~are ~~and~~combined ~~regulations~~for ~~promulgated~~speculative position ~~thereunder~~limit purposes. InIf ~~the~~positions ~~event~~in ~~Superfund~~those ~~Capital~~accounts ~~Management’s~~were ~~registration~~to asapproach athe ~~commodity~~level ~~pool~~of ~~operator~~the ~~was~~particular ~~terminated~~speculative orposition ~~suspended,~~limit Superfund Capital Management ~~would~~may ~~be unable~~modify tothe ~~continue~~trading todecisions ~~manage~~for ~~its business or~~ the Fund. ~~Should~~or ~~Superfund~~be ~~Capital~~forced ~~Management’s~~to ~~registration~~liquidate becertain ~~suspended~~futures positions, ~~termination~~possibly ofresulting ~~the~~in ~~Fund might result~~losses.

InThe ~~addition~~Fund tomay ~~such~~also ~~registration~~trade ~~requirements,~~in ~~the~~dealer ~~CFTC~~markets ~~and~~for ~~certain~~forward ~~commodity exchanges have established limits on the maximum net long~~ and ~~net~~swap ~~short~~contracts. ~~positions~~In ~~which any person~~addition, ~~including~~ the Fund~~, may~~ ~~hold~~trades oron ~~control~~foreign incommodity ~~certain futures contracts. Most~~ exchanges, ~~also~~which ~~limit~~are ~~the~~not ~~maximum~~currently ~~changes~~subject into ~~futures~~regulation ~~contract~~by ~~prices~~any ~~that~~U.S. ~~may~~government ~~occur during a single trading day~~agency. InThe ~~November~~Dodd-Frank ~~2011,~~Wall ~~the~~Street ~~CFTC~~Reform ~~adopted~~and aConsumer ~~new~~Protection ~~position~~Act ~~limits regime for 28 so-called~~ (“~~exempt~~Dodd-Frank”) ~~(i.e.,~~was ~~metals~~enacted ~~and~~in ~~energy)~~July ~~and~~2010. ~~agricultural~~As ~~futures~~a ~~and~~result ~~options~~of ~~contracts~~the rules ~~and~~being ~~their~~implemented ~~economically~~by ~~equivalent~~the ~~swap~~CFTC ~~contracts.~~pursuant ~~These~~to ~~position~~Dodd-Frank, ~~limits~~the ~~are~~regulatory ~~not~~landscape ~~yet~~affecting ~~effective~~the ~~and~~Fund ~~there~~ is ~~considerable uncertainty surrounding their application~~evolving. ~~All~~For ~~accounts~~example, ~~controlled~~Dodd-Frank bymandates ~~Superfund~~that ~~Capital~~a ~~Management,~~substantial ~~including~~portion of over-the-counter ~~accounts~~derivatives ofbe ~~each~~executed ~~Series,~~in ~~are~~regulated ~~combined~~markets and submitted for ~~speculative~~clearing ~~position~~to ~~limit~~regulated ~~purposes~~clearinghouses. IfThe ~~positions~~mandates inimposed ~~those~~by ~~accounts~~Dodd-Frank ~~were~~may toresult ~~approach~~in the ~~level~~Fund ofbearing ~~the~~higher ~~particular speculative~~upfront ~~position~~and ~~limit~~mark-to-market ~~Superfund~~margin, ~~Capital~~less ~~Management~~favorable ~~may~~trade ~~modify~~pricing, and the ~~trading~~possible ~~decisions~~imposition ~~for~~of ~~the~~new ~~Fund~~ or beincreased ~~forced~~fees including toaccount ~~liquidate~~maintenance ~~certain futures positions, possibly resulting in losses~~fees.

The Fund ~~may~~itself ~~also~~has ~~trade~~no ~~in dealer markets for forward and swap contracts~~employees. InRather ~~addition,~~it ~~the~~is ~~Fund~~operated ~~trades on foreign commodity exchanges, which are not subject to regulation~~ by ~~any~~Superfund ~~U.S.~~Capital ~~government agency~~Management. ~~The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) was enacted in July 2010. As a result of the rules being implemented by the CFTC pursuant to~~Superfund ~~Dodd-Frank,~~Capital ~~the~~Management ~~regulatory~~employs ~~landscape~~approximately ~~affecting~~nine ~~the~~people ~~Fund~~on ~~is evolving. For example, Dodd-Frank mandates that~~ a ~~substantial portion of over~~full-~~the-counter~~time ~~derivatives be executed in regulated markets and submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses~~basis. ~~The~~ ~~mandates imposed by Dodd-Frank may result in the Fund bearing higher upfront and mark-to-market margin, less favorable trade pricing, and the possible imposition of new or increased fees.~~

~~The~~Item ~~Fund itself has no employees~~1A. ~~Rather~~Risk ~~it is operated by Superfund Capital Management~~Factors. ~~Superfund Capital Management employs approximately 12 people on a full-time basis.~~

~~Item~~Not 1Arequired. ~~Risk Factors.~~

~~Not required~~Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

~~Item~~Not 1Brequired. ~~Unresolved Staff Comments.~~

~~Not~~Item ~~required~~2. Properties.

~~Item~~The 2Fund does not own or use any physical properties in the conduct of its business. ~~Properties~~Its assets currently consist of futures and other contracts, cash and U.S. Treasury Bills. Superfund Capital Management’s office is located at Superfund Office Building, P.O. Box 1479, Grand Anse, St. George’s, Grenada, West Indies.

~~The~~Item ~~Fund does not own or use any physical properties in the conduct of its business~~3. ~~Its~~Legal ~~assets currently consist of futures and other contracts, cash and U~~Proceedings.~~S. Treasury Bills.~~

~~Item 3~~None. ~~Legal Proceedings.~~

~~None~~Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

~~Item~~Not 4applicable. ~~Mine Safety Disclosures.~~

~~Not~~PART ~~applicable.~~II

~~Item~~(a) 5. Market ~~for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.~~Information

There is no trading market for the Units, and none is likely to develop. Units may be redeemed upon five (a5) business ~~Market~~days ~~Information~~prior notice to Superfund Capital Management at their net asset value as of the last day of the month in which the redemption request is received.

~~There is~~4 no trading market for the Units, and none is likely to develop. Units may be redeemed upon five (5) business days prior notice to Superfund Capital Management at their net asset value as of the last day of the month in which the redemption request is received.

~~Table~~(b) ~~of Contents~~Holders

~~(b)~~As ~~Holders~~of February 28, 2014, there were 329 holders of Series A-1 Units, 93 holders of Series A-2 Units, 57 holders of Series B-1 Units, and 79 holders of Series B-2 Units.

As(c) ~~of December 31, 2012, there were 500 holders of Series A-1 Units, 96 holders of Series A-2 Units, 134 holders of Series B-1 Units, and 44 holders of Series B-2 Units.~~ Dividends

~~(c)~~Superfund ~~Dividends~~Capital Management has sole discretion in determining what distributions, if any, the Fund will make to its Limited Partners. Superfund Capital Management has not made any distributions as of the date hereof and has no present intention to make any.

~~Superfund Capital~~(d) ~~Management~~Securities ~~has~~Authorized ~~sole~~for ~~discretion~~Issuance inUnder ~~determining~~Equity ~~what~~Compensation ~~distributions, if any, the Fund will make to its Limited Partners. Superfund Capital Management has not made any distributions as of the date hereof and has no present intention to make any.~~ Plans

~~(d)~~None. ~~Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans~~

~~None.~~(e) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

~~(e)~~There ~~Recent~~were ~~Sales~~no sales of ~~Unregistered~~unregistered ~~Securities;~~securities during the year ended December 31, 2013. A description of the use of proceeds from the sale of registered securities is contained in the Fund’s current Prospectus, dated May 1, 2013, included within the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Superfund Gold, L.P.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-179534), under “Use of Proceeds” and such description is incorporated herein by reference from ~~Registered~~the ~~Securities~~Prospectus.

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, 2012. A description of the use of proceeds from the sale of registered securities is contained in the Fund’s current Prospectus, dated May 11, 2012, included within the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (~~File No. 333-162132~~f), ~~under~~Purchases ~~“Use~~ of ~~Proceeds”~~Equity ~~and~~Securities ~~such description is incorporated herein~~ by ~~reference~~the ~~from~~Issuer ~~the~~and ~~Prospectus.~~Affiliated Purchasers

~~(f)~~Pursuant ~~Purchases~~to the Fund’s Limited Partnership Agreement, Limited Partners may redeem their Units at the end of ~~Equity~~each ~~Securities~~calendar bymonth at the ~~Issuer~~then current month-end net asset value per Unit. The redemption of Units has no impact on the value of the Units that remain outstanding, and ~~Affiliated~~Units ~~Purchasers~~are not reissued once redeemed.

~~Pursuant~~The tofollowing ~~the~~tables ~~Fund’s~~summarize ~~Limited~~the ~~Partnership~~redemptions ~~Agreement,~~by Limited Partners ~~may~~during ~~redeem their Units at~~ the fourth ~~end of each~~ calendar ~~month~~quarter ~~at the then current month-end net asset value per Unit. The redemption~~ of ~~Units~~2013: ~~has no impact on the value of the Units that remain outstanding, and Units are not reissued once redeemed.~~

~~The following~~Series ~~tables summarize the redemptions by Limited Partners during the fourth calendar quarter of 2012~~A-1:

Series A-1:


Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Value per Unit ($)
October 31, 2013		217.234		1,155.74
November 30, 2013		211.831		1,096.62
December 31, 2013		199.070		1,083.46

Total		628.135

Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Valueper Unit ($)
October 31, 2012		184.748		1,512.67
November 30, 2012		295.993		1,409.21
December 31, 2012		159.494		1,423.03
Total		640.235
Series A-2:
Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Valueper Unit ($)
October 31, 2012		5.989		1,671.22
November 30, 2012		3.847		1,559.52
December 31, 2012		34.095		1,577.45
Total		43.931
Series B-1:
Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Valueper Unit ($)
October 31, 2012		489.252		1,199.93
November 30, 2012		284.625		1,079.43
December 31, 2012		96.500		1,110.58
Total		870.377
Series B-2:
Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Valueper Unit ($)
October 31, 2012		112.120		1,278.36
November 30, 2012		119.172		1,151.90
December 31, 2012		47.704		1,187.13
Total		278.996

Series A-2:


Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Value per Unit ($)
October 31, 2013		21.385		1,302.76
November 30, 2013		0.000		1,238.19
December 31, 2013		51.784		1,225.37

Total		73.169

~~Table~~Series ofB-1: ~~Contents~~

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.


Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Value per Unit ($)
October 31, 2013		39.613		955.53
November 30, 2013		58.188		906.34
December 31, 2013		122.773		913.20

Total		220.574

~~Not~~Series ~~required.~~B-2:

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


Month	Units Redeemed		Net Asset Value per Unit ($)
October 31, 2013		32.064		1,038.62
November 30, 2013		8.965		986.80
December 31, 2013		193.487		995.94

Total		234.516

~~Introduction~~5

~~Liquidity~~Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

~~Most~~Not Urequired.~~S. commodity~~ exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. This may affect the Fund’s ability to initiate new positions or close existing ones or may prevent it from having orders executed. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses, which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Fund may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices if little trading in such contracts is taking place.

~~Trading~~Item ~~in forward contracts introduces a possible further impact on liquidity~~7. ~~Because~~Management’s ~~such~~Discussion ~~contracts~~and ~~are~~Analysis ~~executed~~of ~~“off exchange”~~Financial ~~between~~Condition ~~private~~and ~~parties,~~Results ~~the~~of ~~time required to offset or “unwind” these positions may be greater than that for regulated instruments~~Operations. ~~This potential delay could be exacerbated to the extent a counterparty is not a U.S. person.~~

~~Other~~Introduction ~~than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Fund’s futures and forward trading operations, the Fund’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.~~

~~Capital~~The ~~Resources~~Fund commenced the offering of Units on February 17, 2009. The initial offering terminated on March 31, 2009, and the Fund commenced operations on April 1, 2009. The continuing offering period commenced at the termination of the initial offering period and is ongoing. For the year ended December 31, 2013, subscriptions totaling $2,375,231 for the Fund as a whole, $464,627 in Series A-1, $709,288 in Series A-2, $238,752 in Series B-1, and $962,564 in Series B-2 had been accepted and redemptions over the same period totaled $8,117,904 for the Fund as a whole, $3,829,066 in Series A-1, $1,410,894 in Series A-2, $1,756,050 in Series B-1, and $1,121,894 in Series B-2.

~~The~~Liquidity Fund will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowings. Due to the nature of the Fund’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.

~~Results~~Most ofU.S. ~~Operations~~commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. This may affect the Fund’s ability to initiate new positions or close existing ones or may prevent it from having orders executed. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses, which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Fund may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices if little trading in such contracts is taking place.

~~2012~~Trading in forward contracts introduces a possible further impact on liquidity. Because such contracts are executed “off exchange” between private parties, the time required to offset or “unwind” these positions may be greater than that for regulated instruments. This potential delay could be exacerbated to the extent a counterparty is not a U.S. person.

~~Series~~Other A:than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Fund’s futures and forward trading operations, the Fund’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.

~~Net~~Capital ~~results~~Resources for the year ended December 31, 2012, were a loss of 4.8% in net asset value for Series A-1 and a loss of 2.9% in net asset value for Series A-2. In this period, Series A experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $760,807. The 2012 results consisted of interest income of $1,885, other income of $520, trading gains of $379,297 and total expenses of $1,142,509. Expenses included $382,247 in management fees, $127,416 in operating expenses, $270,220 in selling commissions, $347,717 in brokerage commissions and $7,984 in other expenses. At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net asset value per Unit of Series A-1 was $1,423.03 and $1,496.15, respectively, and of Series A-2 was $1,577.45 and $1,625.63, respectively.

~~Series~~The B:Fund will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowings. Due to the nature of the Fund’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.

~~Net~~Results ~~results for the year ended December 31, 2012, were a loss~~ of ~~10.5%~~Operations in net asset value for Series B-1 and a loss of 8.8% in net asset value for Series B-2. In this period, Series B experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $708,640. The 2012 results consisted of interest income of $1,540, $450 in other income, trading losses of $17,528 and total expenses of $693,102. Expenses included $211,520 in management fees, $70,506 in operating expenses, $104,986 in selling commissions, $289,361 in brokerage commissions and $10,890 in other expenses. At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net asset value per Unit of Series B-1 was $1,110.58 and $1,241.61, respectively, and of Series B-2 was $1,187.13 and $1,300.90, respectively.

62013

~~Table~~Series ofA: ~~Contents~~

~~Fund~~Net results for ~~4th~~the ~~Quarter~~year ended December 31, 2013, were a loss of 23.9% in net asset value for Series A-1 and a loss of 22.3% in net asset value for Series A-2. In this period, Series A experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $2,960,177. The 2013 results consisted of interest income of $1,395, other income of $44, trading losses of $2,180,243 and total expenses of $781,373. Expenses included $267,413 in management fees, $89,141 in operating expenses, $186,577 in selling commissions, $231,669 in brokerage commissions and $6,573 in other expenses. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:, the net asset value per Unit of Series A-1 was $1,083.46 and $1,423.03, respectively, and of Series A-2 was $1,225.37 and $1,577.45, respectively.

InSeries ~~December,~~B: the Fund’s strategies ended 2012 on a positive note with gains despite the uncertainty resulting from U.S. budgetary negotiations. As the year-end deadline approached, U.S. political leaders struggled to avert the so-called fiscal cliff, a term used to describe the deadlock over $607 billion in tax increases and cuts to government spending. Meanwhile the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) announced $45 billion in monthly treasury purchases while also linking its key interest rate to unemployment and inflation for the first time. U.S. equities finished nearly unchanged despite optimistic economic data while European and Asian stocks gained ground. Japanese stocks and commodities were lifted by the plummeting yen as newly elected Prime Minister Shinzo Abe pushed for bold monetary easing. Gold and silver fell below 200-day moving averages while base metals and energies fluctuated on fiscal cliff related demand prospects. The Fund’s short-term strategies produced mixed returns with gains in stocks and metals and losses in energies. The Fund’s models generated positive returns in global equity indices in December as tensions over European finances eased. The DAX gained ground on encouraging factory orders and inflation-free consumer price index and producer price index figures while the IBEX35 and MIB40 climbed in-spite of economic weakness. The Japanese Nikkei soared as the tumbling yen boosted export demand expectation while Chinese H-Shares profited on strong industrial production and retail sales data. In the U.S., the Dow Jones Industrial Average (the “Dow”) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) declined on the fiscal cliff deadlock before reaching positive territory on the last day of trading as political parties closed in on a budgetary resolution. The Nasdaq Stock Market (the “Nasdaq”) fell as shares of the influential Apple Inc. continued to come under pressure. The Fund’s positions in the bond sector resulted in loss in December as U.S. fiscal cliff negotiations continued to drive market movement. Fiscal cliff uncertainty, expectations for poor U.S. employment data, and downbeat euro-zone forecasts drove global yields lower at the start of December. The addition of 146,000 jobs and the Fed’s expansion of the third round of quantitative easing (“QE3”) reversed the trend as investors turned to risk. Renewed optimism for a budget resolution pushed U.S. 10-year Treasury yields to a 7-week high of 1.85% before investment turned to safety once again. German bund yields approached record lows on expectations for a rate cut by the European Central Bank (“ECB”) before Greece reached a deal to repurchase some of its sovereign securities and the ECB left rates unchanged, diminishing demand for Europe’s safest asset. The Fund’s allocations to currency markets profited in December as trends in the euro and yen persisted. The U.S. dollar was lower against major currencies due to the increasing threat of fiscal cliff tax increases and spending cuts. The euro remained relatively strong as the ECB again held the line on interest rates and the recent recovery in equity markets boosted confidence. The British pound also gained despite the relative weakness of the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) economy. The U.S. dollar lost value against most South American currencies including the Columbian peso and Brazilian real. The Japanese yen fell drastically, reaching a 28-month low, as the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) continued its attempts to weaken its currency. The Australian dollar was modestly weaker in the face of soft commodity demand. The Fund’s grain positions generated losses in December after China canceled U.S. soybean purchases and favorable weather in South America increased harvest expectations. Soybeans and soybean by-products initially climbed to a one-month high, aided by solid exports and crush data. Soybean markets were then abruptly sent lower as China canceled purchases totaling 840,000 metric tons. Soybeans fell to a one-month low of $13.97 3/4 before settling down just 1.6%. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position negatively affected performance in December as anxieties surrounding U.S. fiscal cliff budget negotiations and signs of recovery in the U.S. housing market reduced both commodity and safe-haven demand for gold. Gold fell to a 4-month low, closing below its 200-day moving average, before recovering slightly. Other market sectors, relative to those discussed above, did not have a substantial impact on the month’s overall performance.

InNet ~~November, the Fund’s strategies produced disappointing~~ results ~~as U.S. budgetary negotiations injected headline risk and volatility across market sectors. World indices fell dramatically following the U.S. presidential election as congressional leaders~~for ~~grappled with how to avert~~ the ~~so-called~~year ~~fiscal~~ended ~~cliff. Fears that such drastic measures would send the U.S.~~December 31, ~~and potentially the world economy~~2013, ~~back~~were ~~into~~a ~~recession~~loss ~~drove~~of ~~investment towards safety~~17.8% ~~Concern turned to optimism later~~ in ~~the~~net ~~month~~asset ~~as lawmakers~~value ~~seemed~~for toSeries ~~make~~B-1 ~~progress,~~and ~~lifting~~a ~~U.S.,~~loss ~~European~~of ~~and Asian equities~~16.1% ~~Energies, supported by tensions~~ in ~~the~~net ~~Middle~~asset ~~East,~~value ~~also benefited from the hopes~~ for ~~budgetary~~Series ~~resolution~~B-2. ~~Base~~In ~~metals~~this ~~gained ground~~period, ~~aided~~Series byB ~~signs~~experienced ~~that~~a ~~the~~net ~~Chinese economy~~decrease ~~is once again accelerating. The Fund’s short-term strategies yielded positive returns~~ in ~~interest~~net ~~rates~~assets ~~and~~from ~~equities~~operations ~~while~~of ~~underperforming in energies~~$997,432. The 2013 ~~Fund’s~~results ~~allocation~~consisted toof ~~long-term~~ interest ~~rates~~income ~~generated~~of ~~positive~~$902, ~~results~~other ~~in November~~income asof ~~U.S. budgetary concerns lifted bond prices. Immediately following the U.S. presidential election~~$19, ~~focus~~trading ~~turned~~losses ~~to the fiscal cliff as politicians publicly debated the merits~~ of ~~their positions~~$581,187 ~~leading~~and tototal ~~reactionary~~expenses ~~market~~of ~~movement~~$417,166. ~~Fiscal~~ ~~cliff~~Expenses ~~anxieties~~included ~~drove~~$136,131 ~~U.S.~~in ~~30-year~~management ~~Treasury~~fees, ~~bonds to all-time highs~~$45,377 ~~settling~~in upoperating ~~1.2%. German bunds~~expenses, ~~Europe’s preeminent safe-haven instrument~~$51,716 also reached all-time highs. Japanese 10-yr bonds reached a 9 1/2 year high amid expectations for aggressive easing after the country’s December election. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced positive returns in ~~November~~selling ascommissions, ~~U.S. dollar weakness~~$172,723 ~~continued~~in ~~with~~brokerage ~~the~~commissions ~~Fed~~and ~~intent~~$11,219 onin ~~keeping~~other ~~interest rates extremely low~~expenses. ~~The~~At ~~euro~~December 31, ~~fell~~2013 ~~versus the U.S. dollar before rebounding late as the ECB kept rates unchanged~~ and ~~European~~December 31, ~~equities~~2012, ~~strengthened. Steady support for~~ the ~~euro~~net ~~from~~asset ~~regional~~value ~~leaders and~~per ~~the~~Unit ~~ECB stabilized fears~~ of anSeries ~~eminent euro~~B-~~zone~~1 ~~breakup.~~was ~~The Japanese yen (-3~~$913.~~2%)~~20 ~~fell~~and sharply as the BOJ provided more signals that easing is on the horizon. The Australian dollar (+0.7%) rose as its economy continued to avoid the problems affecting the rest of the globe. The Canadian dollar (+0.8%) also strengthened against the U.S. dollar while the Mexican Peso (+$1,110.~~4%) gained~~58, ~~on positive industrial production and retail sales. The Fund’s positions in metals resulted in loss in November as bearish trends reversed on hopes for additional fiscal stimulus~~respectively, ~~alternative investment demand~~ and ~~accelerating~~of ~~growth~~Series ~~in China. Gold and silver fell sharply to start November after better~~B-~~than-expected~~2 ~~U.S. unemployment figures were seen as alleviating pressure on the Fed to implement additional stimulus measures. The dip~~ was ~~short-lived as post-election optimism grew for a resolution to the U~~$995.S.94 ~~budget impasse. After falling to an 8-week low on November 2, COMEX silver climbed a robust 7.6% to close 2.8% higher. Base metals copper~~ and ~~aluminum~~$1, ~~after falling 13~~187.~~4% and 9.7% respectively since mid-September~~13, ~~both climbed steadily on prospects for increased demand from China~~ respectively. ~~The Fund’s energies positions produced negative results in November, as crude prices edged up after the breakout of hostilities between Israel and Hamas~~

and ongoing political tensions in Syria and Iran injected risk premium into energies. Nymex crude (+3.1%) rose sharply in reaction to the conflict while IPE Brent crude (+2.3%) was modestly higher. Lack of global economic growth, increasing production rates and high levels of inventories kept West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) prices contained. RBOB gasoline (+4.1%) gained significant ground as inventories slipped after two straight gains. After climbing as much as 5.6%, natural gas plummeted late on an unexpected gain in U.S. stockpiles due to unusually mild winter weather in the northern hemisphere. Natural gas finished down 6.8% in volatile trade. The Fund’s ~~perpetual~~results ~~long gold position produced modest negative returns in November as rapidly changing expectations~~ for a4th ~~U.S.~~Quarter ~~budget~~2013: ~~deal injected volatility into the gold market. Other market sectors, relative to those discussed above, did not have a substantial impact on the month’s overall performance.~~

InThe ~~October, the~~ Fund’s ~~strategies~~ ~~produced~~managed ~~disappointing~~futures ~~results~~strategies asproduced ~~encouraging~~positive ~~economic~~returns data supported equities while commodity demand remained tepid. Investors looking for signs of additional economic stimulus were let down as central bankers were generally quiet. In China, direct foreign investment fell for the 10th time in 11 ~~months~~December, ~~contrasting~~led ~~with~~by improvements in exports and retail sales. U.S. housing starts hit a 4-year high and unemployment unexpectedly fell below 8.0%, lifting stocks and pressuring safe-haven debt instruments. Moody’s maintained Spain’s credit rating at investment grade, citing the ECB’s willingness to buy sovereign debt. Growing stockpiles of crude oil and distillate fuels met head-on with diminishing demand. RBOB gasoline fell for nine straight sessions, its longest slump in 25 years. The Fund’s ~~short-term strategies yielded mixed returns with gains in currencies and losses in metals and interest rates. The Fund’s equity index~~ positions ~~generated mixed results~~ in ~~October.~~the ~~While economic conditions remained challenging across Europe~~bond, ~~equities~~currency ~~finished modestly higher on improved economic data. The Italian MIB (+1.9%)~~ and energy ~~French CAC40 (+2~~sectors.~~2%) both~~ ~~finished with gains as industrial production improved.~~ The ~~London~~Dow ~~FTSE (+0.9%)~~Jones ~~rose~~Industrial ~~modestly~~Average ~~as gross domestic product~~ (the “~~GDP~~Dow”) ~~growth~~and ~~beat forecasts while~~ the ~~German~~Standard & ~~DAX~~Poor’s 500 (~~+0.5%)~~“S&P ~~was slightly higher despite declining factory orders. Equities in the east were mixed as uncertainty drove investor sentiment. Chinese H-Shares (+7.6%~~500”) ~~rose~~ aseach ~~GDP~~reached ~~and~~new ~~retail~~highs ~~sales surpassed expectations. The South Korean Kospi (-5.2%) fell~~ as ~~growth remained sluggish while~~ the ~~Nikkei (+0.5%) rose on anticipated government stimulus. Weakness in the~~ U.S. ~~technology sector~~Federal ~~sent~~Reserve (the ~~Nasdaq~~“Fed”) ~~down~~announced ~~5.4%.~~plans ~~The Fund’s allocations~~ to ~~long-term~~cut ~~interest rates underperformed in October as European peripheral woes created a risk-on, risk-off environment, while economic data in the U.S. pressured treasury futures.~~its ~~German~~monthly ~~bunds~~bond ~~dropped~~purchases 0.7% after Moody’s affirmed Spain’s investment grade credit rating at just above junk. Moody’s subsequently lowered the ratings of five Spanish regional economies. The localized downgrades along with an 11% tumble in Spanish retail sales drove assets back into the safety of bunds. Bund yields climbed as high as 1.66% before falling back to ~~1.46%.~~$75 ~~U.S.~~billion ~~bonds~~from ~~experienced~~$85 ~~consistent declines~~billion, ~~influenced by a drastic dip in~~ the ~~unemployment~~first ~~rate~~step ~~and~~toward ~~significant increases~~unwinding inits ~~new~~economic ~~housing~~stimulus ~~starts~~program. The ~~Fund’s~~euro ~~positions~~gained inagainst the ~~metals sector underperformed in October as prospects for additional stimulus measures diminished and the~~ U.S. dollar ~~firmed. Expectations for another round of growth initiatives in China receded~~ as ~~September~~reports ~~exports~~showed ~~climbed~~Italy’s ~~9.9% and~~ industrial production ~~accelerated. The Fed avoided addressing the approaching expiration of their Operation Twist program~~expanded, ~~reducing~~boosting ~~demand~~optimism ~~for gold and silver as inflation hedges. COMEX copper and~~of ~~LME~~economic ~~aluminum declined 6~~recovery.4% ~~and~~Crude ~~9.8%~~oil ~~respectively~~gained ~~as the debt crisis continued to weigh~~ on ~~world~~declines ~~economies. The Fund’s energy portfolio underperformed~~ in ~~October~~inventories ascoupled ~~markets~~with ~~gave back recent gains. Crude oil fell another 7% as the global economy remained weak. North American crude output swelled to a 17~~above-~~year~~forecast high while consumption fell to a 4-year low. Earning misses by economic heavyweights Microsoft and General Electric signaled further demand reduction while Chinese imports remained depressed. European benchmark Brent crude (-3.3%) held up well relative to the WTI contract as the spread between the two widened to as much $24.87. Natural gas (+2.2%) rose to a 2012 high ($3.97/M btu) as storage levels were unchanged even though production rates remain high. The Fund’s allocations to foreign exchange markets generated moderate gains as the U.S. ~~dollar~~economic ~~fluctuated~~data ~~relative~~and tonews ~~world~~that ~~currencies.~~internal ~~The~~strife British pound was steady against the U.S. dollar as GDP rose 1.0%, taking the U.K. out of recessionary territory. The Euro (+0.7%) rose modestly as the ECB took no action, citing elevated but acceptable levels of inflation. The Australian dollar weakened as the Reserve Bank of Australia (“RBA”) unexpectedly cut rates by 25 bps to 3.25% before a sharp climb in ~~consumer~~South ~~prices~~Sudan ~~(+1.4%) dampened~~may ~~expectations for~~ further ~~easing.~~threaten ~~The~~oil ~~Canadian dollar (-1~~inventories.~~6%)~~ ~~fell as a Bank of Canada governor’s discouraging economic outlook doused expectations of near-term tightening.~~ The Fund’s perpetual long gold position negatively impacted performance in ~~October as signs of economic stability reduced precious metal demand~~December. Expectations that central bankers globally will curb stimulus measures reduced demand for gold as a hedge against inflation. Other market sectors, relative to those discussed above, did not have a substantial impact on the month’s overall performance.

~~For~~In November, the ~~fourth~~Fund’s ~~quarter~~managed offutures ~~2012,~~strategy experienced positive returns as its positions in indices and metals produced significant gains. Both the ~~most~~Dow ~~profitable~~and the S&P 500 set all-time highs as stocks rose sharply on better-than-expected corporate profit reports and news that the Fed would continue its easy-money policies. The Fund’s positions in the currency, money market ~~group~~and ~~overall~~grains ~~was~~sectors also produced positive results. The Fund’s allocation to the ~~currencies~~energy sector ~~while~~performed ~~the~~negatively ~~greatest~~in ~~losses~~November ~~were~~as its positions in NYMEX gasoline, natural gas and crude oil all produced ~~attributable~~losses after a temporary trade agreement was reached with Iran – the world’s fourth largest oil producer. U.S. crude oil production rose by 45,000 bbl/day to 8.02 million, placing it at the highest point in 25 years. The Fund’s short positions in ~~the~~COMEX ~~metals~~gold ~~sector~~and silver posted gains on reports of lackluster Chinese manufacturing growth, which fell to a two-month low. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position negatively impacted performance in November.

The Fund’s managed futures strategy yielded positive results in October, as the Fund benefitted from its allocations to indices and bonds. For the first time since 2011, Japanese Government Bonds (“JGB”) rose for the ~~3rd~~fourth ~~Quarter~~consecutive ~~2012:~~month, producing strong gains for the Fund’s long positions. The Fund’s long positions in indices also performed well as the S&P500 rose to a record high. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector produced disappointing results. The Fund’s long NYMEX natural gas positions suffered on speculation the U.S. Energy Information Administration would report increases in supply. The Fund’s allocation to metals also produced negative results as the Fed fueled speculation that it would trim the U.S. monetary stimulus sooner than anticipated. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position negatively impacted performance in October.

~~In September, the~~ Fund’s ~~trading strategies produced negative~~ results as the expansion of accommodative policies by central bankers led investors to add risk. Optimism that followed the ECB’s decision to buy Spanish and Italian bonds was amplified by the Fed’s announcement of QE3, lifting equities worldwide. The Fed revealed an open-ended plan to buy mortgage-backed securities while holding the federal funds rate near zero through at least mid-2015. The BOJ’s move to add 10 trillion yen to their asset purchase program and China’s openness to stimulus further supported stocks. Base metals climbed on hopes for ~~increased~~3rd ~~demand~~Quarter ~~while~~2013: gold and silver benefited as inflation hedges. NY crude topped $100/bbl before growing stockpiles and the end of the summer driving season helped to reverse the trend. Natural gas rallied to a 2012 high on below normal gains in inventory ahead of the winter heating season. The Fund’s short-term strategies posted mixed results with gains in metals and losses in currencies. The Fund’s bond

8The Fund’s managed futures strategies produced negative returns in September. The Fund’s long positions in the energy sector hurt performance as natural gas futures continued to retrace from near three-month highs amid reduced anticipated demand based on U.S. weather forecasts. The Fund’s long positions in the metals markets also underperformed as gold futures tumbled following a report that U.S. jobless claims fell to the lowest level since April 2006. Gold and silver continued to decline on concerns over a possible shutdown of the U.S. government in October. The Fund’s positions in the bonds sector produced favorable returns as Japan’s inflation rate soared to its highest level since 2008. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position negatively impacted performance in September.

~~Table~~In August, the Fund’s managed futures strategies underperformed as gold and silver continued their recovery from the previous month on news that U.S. home sales fell below consensus forecast indicating that the Fed will continue its stimulus program. The Fund’s short positions in the grain markets produced negative returns as soybeans rose to a nine-month high. The Fund’s long positions in crude yielded positive results as prices rose at the end of ~~Contents~~the month to its highest level since April 2011. Crude’s rally coincided with signs of accelerating economic growth in Europe and the contemplation of Western military action against Syria. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position had a positive impact on performance in August.

The ~~positions produced moderate losses in September as central bank intervention drove market movement. German bund yields climbed sharply as the ECB~~Fund’s ~~plan~~managed ~~to purchase Italian and Spanish debt reduced safe-haven demand. Bund~~ futures ~~reached~~strategies ~~3-month~~produced ~~lows~~slightly ~~before~~negative ~~concern~~returns ~~over~~in ~~austerity measures within Spain’s 2013 budget and its ability to cooperate with the ECB sparked anxieties and reversed the move~~July. ~~After dipping 1.5%, U.S. 10-year note futures recovered to nearly unchanged on higher than expected U.S. jobless claims.~~ The ~~BOJ also eased, adding 10 trillion yen to its existing asset purchase program, suppressing Japanese Government Bonds (“JGB”) yields. The~~ Fund’s ~~allocation~~short topositions ~~currencies underperformed~~ in ~~September as~~ the ~~U.S.~~metals ~~dollar~~and ~~lost~~bonds ~~ground~~markets ~~against~~suffered ~~all~~as ~~major~~the ~~currencies~~market inweighed ~~response to~~ the Fed’s ~~stimulus.~~next ~~Market~~move ~~expectations~~on ~~for~~monetary ~~QE3~~stimulus ~~proved~~against tothe beprospects ~~correct as a weak employment data prompted further~~for ~~injections~~demand ofamid ~~liquidity~~higher prices. ~~The~~Gold ~~Fed~~also ~~moved~~recovered ~~its~~from ~~focus~~a ~~to the mortgage market, announcing open~~three-~~ended~~year ~~monthly~~low ~~purchases~~on ofnews ~~$40~~that ~~billion in mortgage backed securities. The ECB implemented a broad bond purchase program but stopped short of lowering interest rates. These moves prompted a decline in~~ the ~~U.S.~~Fed ~~dollar~~would ~~versus~~only ~~the~~start ~~euro~~phasing ~~(+2.2%) and~~out the ~~British~~stimulus ~~pound~~once ~~versus~~ the ~~U.S.~~economy ~~dollar~~was ~~(+1.6%).~~strong ~~The~~enough ~~Canadian~~to ~~dollar~~stand ~~(+0.3%)~~on ~~strengthened~~its ~~versus the U~~own.S. ~~dollar~~This asnews ~~jobs~~allayed ~~data~~fears ~~was~~of ~~better-than-expected.~~imminent ~~In Japan,~~cuts ~~the~~to ~~expansion of~~ the ~~BOJ~~Fed’s monthly bond ~~purchase program led to volatile month for the yen (+0~~purchases.5% ~~versus the U.S. dollar).~~ The ~~Fund’s~~losses ~~positions~~from in the metals sector generated positive results in September as plans for open-ended asset purchases by U.S. and European central bankers and new infrastructure spending in China lifted both precious and base metal alike. Disappointing U.S. jobs data fueled growing expectations for monetary stimulus while ChinaFund’s ~~approval of new infrastructure spending supported~~ metals ~~early. Metals spiked higher following the announcement of QE3 with London Metal Exchange (“LME”) Aluminum (+11.3%) posting 11 consecutive gains, its longest rally in 25 years. LME~~ and ~~COMEX copper~~bond ~~gained~~positions ~~7.7%~~was ~~and~~partly ~~8.7%~~offset ~~respectively on anticipated raw material demand. Labor unrest in South Africa forced the closure of mines owned~~ by ~~Anglo~~gains ~~American~~from ~~Platinum,~~ the ~~world’s top producer. Platinum was up 19.2% since August 16. The~~ Fund’s ~~allocations~~long topositions in the ~~energies~~energy sector ~~yielded disappointing results in September~~ as ~~the 30% climb in crude since June abruptly reversed on demand concerns and a build in supplies~~U. ~~Saudi Arabia’s commitment to increase production, concern over a Spanish bailout and a reduced profit outlook from economic bellwether Fedex sent prices lower~~S. ~~The~~Energy ~~September 19~~Information ~~inventory~~Administration ~~report~~data showed aoil ~~build~~inventories offeel ~~+8.53M bbl, culminating in a 4.4% decline~~ for ~~crude. Gasoline strengthened against~~a ~~crude,~~fourth ~~climbing~~consecutive 1week.~~2%,~~ as refining capacity remained constrained. Heating oil also gained as the winter heating season draws near. Natural gas (+12.1%) finished at 2012 highs on news that stockpiles will fall short of capacity prior to winter. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position ~~produced~~had ~~strong~~a ~~results~~positive aseffect ~~investors~~on ~~flocked~~performance ~~to gold~~ in ~~order to hedge away inflation risk brought on by the currency debasing polices of the ECB and the Fed~~July. ~~Gold’s attraction as a value store drove it 5.1% higher, reaching a 6-month high ($1,787/Troy oz). The quarterly gain of 11% was its best since June of 2010.~~

~~In August, apart from its perpetual long gold position, the~~ Fund’s ~~strategies produced moderately disappointing~~ results ~~as guidance from central bankers increased investor appetite~~ for ~~risk.~~2nd ~~ECB~~Quarter ~~president Mario Draghi’s late July statement~~2013: that the he would do “whatever it takes” to preserve the euro proved to be the driving force behind a rally in European equity markets. German Chancellor Angela Merkel reaffirmed her country’s support for the ECB’s approach, increasing expectations for monetary stimulus. U.S. equities rallied in tandem with Europe, aided by a series of positive economic data, with the S&P 500 reaching a four-year high. Fed minutes released in advance of the highly anticipated Jackson Hole symposium revealed the Federal Open Market Committee’s (“FOMC”) intention to implement QE3 unless the strength and pace of economic recovery improves soon. Energy markets rallied markedly, lifted by U.S. and euro-zone optimism, heightened tensions in the Middle East, and the falling U.S. dollar. The drought gripping the U.S. Midwest drove corn and soybean to all-time highs. The Fund’s short-term strategies underperformed with losses in equities, energies and currencies. The Fund’s positions in equities underperformed in August as European leaders worked to improve the region’s fiscal position, reducing anxiety over euro-zone debt issues. Yields in Spain and Italy fell back on increasing expectations that the ECB will take action to avoid default. Equities in the U.K. (+1.8%), Italy (+8.9%), and Spain (+10.5%) all finished with gains in spite of weak economic data. France (+3.6%) and Germany (+2.7%) managed to avoid recession during the second quarter, outperforming their neighbors in the European Union (the “EU”). In the U.S., the S&P 500 (+2.2%) also gained, posting a four-year high. Asian equities in Japan (+1.6%) and Taiwan (+3.3%) finished on the plus side while stocks in China (-4.3%) fell as exports slowed. The Fund’s bond positions posted disappointing results in August as U.S. treasuries sold off steadily throughout the first half of the month in response to positive economic data and euro-zone optimism. Retail sales rose for the first time in four months while an encouraging 1.8% gain in housing prices signaled a strengthening economy. Reduced demand for safe-haven assets lifted U.S. 10-year note yields to an intraday three-month high of 1.86% before falling after Fed minutes alluded to the possible need for further stimulus. Positive economic news in Europe also contributed to risk appetite with better-than-expected GDP data from Germany (+0.3%) and France (unchanged), pressuring German bunds. The Fund’s positions in the energies sector benefited in August as the uptrend in the crude oil complex that began in July continued. Stronger employment data in the U.S. and an easing of European economic fears boosted the crude market early on expectations for increased demand. Inventory reports showed both crude and heating oil shrunk with heating oil inventories falling to a seasonally adjusted 4-year low. Tensions in the Middle East showed no signs of abating as hostilities continued to escalate in Syria. Crude prices climbed 9.6% while heating oil rose 11.5%. Natural gas prices fell back sharply, -12.8% to $2.799 per million British thermal unit (“btu”), as the supply glut rose still further and temperatures moderated. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced negative results in August. High expectations on the latest ECB meeting went unmet as little new information was revealed and rates were left unchanged. Germany’s firm support of the euro and Greece’s reaffirmed dedication to meeting bailout targets, bolstered confidence. As a result, both the euro (+2.2%) and British pound (+1.3%) gained ground versus the U.S. dollar. The U.S. dollar (-1.8%) was mostly weaker as the slow pace of U.S. growth prompted the FOMC to suggest that additional stimulus might be necessary to spur a sustainable recovery. The Australian dollar (-1.5%) fell as weakening Chinese demand threatened to dampen exports. The Japanese yen (-0.3%) lost ground early on weak economic data but quickly rebounded. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position posted strong gains in August as gold regained its preferred status as an inflationary hedge. Bulls betting on monetary easing were rewarded when Fed minutes predicted additional stimulus measures if the U.S. economy failed to show signs of durable growth soon. Gold had its best month since January, gaining 4.6%.

9The Fund’s strategies produced negative returns in June, driven primarily by losses from the Fund’s allocation to energies markets as U.S. Department of Energy data showed higher than expected returns as a rise in the U.S. dollar produced sharp downward pressure on interest rate products. Based on the aforementioned decrease in price, the Fund’s perpetual long gold position negatively affected performance in June.

~~Table~~7 ~~of Contents~~

~~For~~In May, the ~~third~~Fund ~~quarter~~yielded ofdisappointing ~~2012,~~results due primarily to its positions in the ~~most~~bonds ~~profitable~~and energy ~~market~~sectors. ~~group~~The ~~overall~~Fund’s ~~was~~long ~~the~~natural ~~money~~gas ~~market~~positions ~~sector~~negatively ~~while~~affected performance amid reports from the U.S. Energy Information Administration of rising inventories. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also issued reports that ~~greatest~~downplayed ~~losses~~the ~~were~~environmental ~~attributable~~impact toof natural gas fracking. The Fund’s long soybean positions produced sold returns in May as China, the ~~currencies~~world’s ~~sector~~largest soybean consumer, continued to show increased demand. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position had a negative effect on performance amid speculation that the Fed will scale back its aggressive bond purchasing program.

In April, the Fund’s ~~results~~managed ~~for~~futures ~~2nd~~strategy ~~Quarter~~posted ~~2012:~~positive returns amidst high volatility in several key markets. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated positive returns, as did its long natural gas positions. The Fund’s allocation to the grains sector suffered in April after the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) reported that farmers had planted 2 million more acres of corn than expected. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position had a negative effect on performance as gold experienced its sharpest monthly decline since December 2011.

~~In June, the~~ Fund’s ~~trading strategies yielded disappointing~~ results as market sensitivity to European debt crisis news led to choppy market conditions. Investor focus remained on troubled European economies, with eyes turned to faltering Spain. Moody’s downgrade of Spanish sovereign debt was followed by rating reductions for ~~numerous~~1st ~~Spanish~~Quarter ~~lenders.~~2013: Depressed European indices reacted positively to EU summit agreements to reduce funding costs for Spain and Italy. U.S. stocks rallied in anticipation of QE3 but were disappointed as the Fed offered only an extension of the Operation Twist program. Commodity demand remains weak as supplies build in base metals and energies. U.S. crude inventories are at their highest since 1990 as growth in consumption is met with greater gains in production. The Fund’s short-term trading strategies also underperformed. The Fund’s allocation to equities underperformed in June due to volatile and directionless trading as European economic conditions weighed on global markets. Uncertainty over Greek elections eased as pro-EU moderates prevailed while business confidence in Germany hit a two-year low. European equities rose at the end of the month, as EU summit leaders eased repayment terms for Spanish banks. In the U.S., the Dow

10In March, the Fund’s trading strategies produced positive returns. U.S. stock indices rose for a third consecutive month with the S&P 500 approaching an all-time high, leading to profitable returns for the Fund’s long positions. The Fund’s long positions in European long-term interest rate futures produced significant gains as investors feared the banking crisis in Cyprus could spill over into neighboring economies. Short positions in base metals added to positive returns as markets were pressured by the debt crisis in Europe, slumping Chinese stocks, and the rising U.S. dollar. The Fund also benefited from long natural gas positions as below normal temperatures forecasted for April lifted futures to an 18-month high. Larger than expected U.S. inventories and record projected planting acreage sent Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) corn to limit down conditions on the last day of trading, resulting in losses for the Fund’s long positions across the grain sector. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position had a small positive effect on performance in March.

~~Table~~The Fund’s managed futures strategy produced positive results in February as unmet expectations for global demand sent commodities lower while unsettling election results in Italy and negative growth renewed European debt concerns. Long positions in equity indices yielded losses for the Fund as European political instability and the slow pace of ~~Contents~~economic activity again raised concerns over regional finances. The Fund’s long bond positions generated solid returns in treasuries as European debt crisis fears were reignited in reaction to inconclusive Italian election results. Long positions in the money market sector generated favorable returns for the Funds as rising interbank borrowing costs prompted European Central Bank (“ECB”) President Mario Draghi to restate the ECB’s readiness to loosen monetary policy, lowering yield expectations. The U.S. dollar strengthened dramatically against a basket of world currencies leading to disappointing results for the Fund’s long positions in counter-currencies. The Fund’s short position in London Metal Exchange (“LME”) aluminum generated healthy returns as anticipated increases in demand had yet to be realized, Chinese production swelled and stockpiles tracked by LME rose for a fifth straight month. After climbing 6% in January, the crude oil complex fell back as the slow pace of recovery across the globe was unable to support a further advance, leading to losses for the Fund’s long positions in the energies sector. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position had a negative impact on performance in February as growing optimism for a U.S. economic recovery led investors to exit safe-haven assets, sending gold lower for a fifth consecutive month.

~~rose~~In ~~3.4%~~January, ~~but~~the ~~gains~~Fund ~~were~~produced ~~tempered~~positive byreturns ~~poor unemployment and weak consumer confidence. China reacted~~ to ~~slowing~~start ~~growth~~2013 bywith ~~cutting its key interest rate. The Australian SPI fell 0.4% despite surprise~~ gains inacross ~~GDP~~multiple ~~and~~market ~~employment, while the Japanese Nikkei climbed 5~~sectors.6% ~~on expectations for further stimulus.~~ The Fund’s ~~bond~~strategies ~~portfolio~~performed well ~~experienced losses~~ in ~~June~~global equities as ~~the~~indices ~~recent~~reached ~~rally~~multi-year ~~stagnated~~highs ~~due~~on togrowing ainvestor ~~lack~~optimism, ofproducing ~~substantial~~profits ~~central bank stimulus. Investors hoping~~ for ~~new asset purchases from~~ the ~~Fed were disappointed as they chose only to expand their Operation Twist program by $267 billion. Europe~~Fund’s ~~bond~~long ~~rally also retreated as area-wide interest rates climbed in response to the increasingly insolvent Spanish banking sector~~positions. ~~While bond rallies in the U.S. and Europe cooled, Japanese 10-year bond futures continued higher with yields reaching 0.79%, the lowest since 2003.~~ The Fund’s ~~allocation~~long topositions ~~currencies produced negative results~~ in ~~June~~base asmetals ~~the~~produced ~~U.S.~~favorable ~~dollar~~results ~~declined~~with ~~versus major currencies. The euro (+2.4% against~~ the ~~U.S.~~rebound ~~dollar) finished~~ in ~~positive territory while remaining under pressure due to~~ the ~~unresolved debt crisis. Spanish bank insolvency and~~global ~~unsustainable~~economy ~~sovereign~~leading ~~debt had sent the euro~~ to ~~23-month~~increased ~~low~~industrial ~~before regaining ground~~demand. ~~The~~Long ~~Swiss~~allocations ~~franc~~across ~~(+2.5%) gained against~~ the ~~dollar~~energies ~~while~~sector ~~holding~~also ~~steady~~generated ~~against~~healthy ~~the~~returns ~~euro.~~for ~~The British pound (+1.7%) rose versus~~ the ~~dollar after May’s sharp decline while also gaining favor versus the euro. The~~ Fund’s ~~grain allocations generated moderate losses in June~~ as ~~hot~~improving ~~and~~global ~~dry~~economic conditions inlifted ~~the~~demand ~~U.S.~~prospects ~~threatened~~while tounrest ~~damage~~across ~~the~~North ~~largest~~Africa ~~projected~~and ~~corn~~the ~~crop since~~Middle ~~1937. December~~East ~~corn~~injected ~~surged~~geopolitical ~~21.6%~~risk ~~as the market digested rapidly deteriorating crop conditions~~premium. ~~Soybeans~~Growing ~~(+12.4%) trailed~~global ~~corn~~economic ~~higher,~~stability ~~tempered~~eroded bydemand ~~hopes~~for ~~that~~ the ~~later~~safety ~~developing~~of ~~crop~~government ~~still~~securities ~~has time to recover. The Fund’s positions~~ in ~~the~~ ~~metals~~January, ~~sector~~leading ~~generated~~to ~~moderately~~ negative ~~results~~returns infor ~~June~~the asFund’s ~~gains~~long ~~in short base metal~~ positions ~~were offset by losses~~ in ~~range-bound~~the ~~COMEX~~bonds ~~gold (-0~~sector.~~4%).~~ ~~Demand~~Expectations for ~~base metals has suffered as Chinese growth has slowed and~~ the ~~broader world~~ ~~economy~~removal ~~has failed to show significant signs~~ of ~~recovery.~~excess ~~After~~liquidity ~~spending~~from ~~nearly~~ the ~~entire~~financial ~~month~~system inled ~~negative territory, however, base metals took part in a global rally spurred by European leaders’ agreement on short-term measures~~ to ~~assist Spanish~~losses ~~banks.~~for ~~The~~the Fund’s ~~allocation~~long topositions ~~the energy sector produced gains~~ in ~~June~~money asmarket ~~weak demand and ample supplies pushed prices lower~~futures. Global economic weakness continues to be the key driver of prices near-term as slowing global growth has hurt overall energy demand. Crude oil touched an eight-month low of $77.28/bbl with supplies reaching 22-year highs. Gasoline (-3.5%) fell as U.S. supplies rose more than expected and demand remains soft. Heating oil (-0.4%) also suffered from a rise in inventories and warm temperatures. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position ~~posted~~negatively ~~disappointing~~affected ~~results~~performance in ~~June~~January as ~~conflicting~~positive ~~market~~economic ~~influences produced trendless trading. The supportive effects of central bank reserve purchases~~metrics, a ~~weaker~~fading ~~dollar~~inflation concerns, and ~~lackluster~~prospects ~~U.S.~~for ~~economic~~an ~~data~~end ~~were~~to ~~counteracted by~~ the ~~lack~~Fed ofmonetary ~~new~~ stimulus ~~from~~led to the ~~Fed~~fourth ~~and~~straight ~~reduced~~monthly ~~demand~~decline ~~out~~for ~~of India, the world’s top consumer~~gold.

In May, the Fund’s trading strategies produced strong results as uncertainty and eroding optimism dominated market sentiment, sending investors on a broad-based flight to safety. Falling business confidence in Germany, rising euro-zone unemployment, and a shrinking manufacturing sector led to dramatic risk reduction across all sectors. The euro decreased to a nearly two-year low as investors sought the safety of the U.S. dollar, pressuring commodities. The S&P GSCI index of 24 commodities plunged 13%, its worst month since the recession of 2008. Demand for capital preservation drove yields of safe-haven debt instruments to all-time lows. The Fund’s short-term models enhanced monthly gains with profitable positions in CME Australian dollar, COMEX gold and CBT U.S. T-Bonds. The Fund’s equity positions excelled in May as markets fell sharply on weakening economic conditions. European economies continued to soften with negative quarterly GDP and falling indices in the U.K. (-7.5%), Italy (-10.4%), Spain (-11.8%), and Greece (-30.6%). Even though Germany managed to show slight positive GDP growth of .5%, Dax futures fell 7.9%. The possibility of a Greek departure from the euro-zone increased as economic and political pressures mount. In the U.S., the Dow slipped 5.3% as factory orders fell 1.5% and leading indicators slipped 0.1%, leaving only modest growth expectations for the near-term. The U.S. added 115,000 jobs in April, the fewest since October, 2011. Shares across Asia were decidedly weak with the Hang Seng (-11.5%), Nikkei (-10.2%), and MSCI Taiwan (-3.5%) sinking on weakening export demand. The Fund’s bond exposure returned substantial profits in May as the risk-off trade prevailed in response to the unresolved debt crisis in Europe. Elevated fears that Greece may leave the euro-zone and an increasingly troubled Spanish banking sector combined to lift borrowing costs for at-risk sovereigns. Fear-driven investment poured into safe-haven assets in Germany, the U.S., and Australia. German 10-year bund futures (+3.5%) rose to all-time highs. In the U.S., strong demand for safety pushed the benchmark 10-year note to a record low of 1.5309% with 30-year yields approaching their 2008 bottom. The Fund’s allocations to currencies yielded strong results in May as the U.S. dollar advanced sharply in a general flight to safety. Heightened European instability and slowing global growth hurt equity markets while driving the Dollar Index to a 5.4% gain and a 21-month high. The euro slid 6.6% against the U.S. dollar as regional unemployment hit 10.9%, a 15-year high. U.K. retail sales dropped the most over two years, pushing the British pound 5.0% lower versus the U.S. dollar. The Australian dollar fell 6.2% as the RBA unexpectedly cut its key lending rate 50 basis points to 3.75%. Only the Japanese yen (+1.8%) managed to rise against the U.S. dollar in relatively quiet trade. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated significant gains in May. Precious and industrial metals fell as a risk-off mentality began to permeate futures markets once again on renewed fears of a global economic recession. Euro-zone service and manufacturing sector data showed contraction for the ninth consecutive month, adding to concerns about the health of the global economy. Manufacturing data in China continued to reveal slowing growth, pushing down industrial metal. LME and COMEX copper fell for four consecutive weeks while LME aluminum slumped 5.9%. All base metals, with the exception of zinc, established new lows for 2012 ~~in May, as did COMEX gold (-6.1%) and silver~~ (-10.3%). The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector produced robust gains, benefitting from the sharp decline in the petroleum complex as ample supply and slack demand pressured prices. After several months of consolidation in crude, technical breaks below support levels led to a significant decline in both NYMEX and Brent futures, dropping 17.5% and 14.7% respectively. In natural gas, the well-established down-trend was finally broken as multi-year lows spurred buying interest. Mild spring weather and warm near-term forecasts helped support prices on increased cooling needs. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position underperformed in May as gold experienced its worst month in 11 years. Investors concerned over the European debt crisis favored the perceived safety of the U.S. dollar over alternative assets such as precious metals.

11Series A:

~~Table~~Net results for the year ended December 31, 2012, were a loss of ~~Contents~~4.8% in net asset value for Series A-1 and a loss of 2.9% in net asset value for Series A-2. In this period, Series A experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $760,807. The 2012 results consisted of interest income of $1,885, other income of $520, trading gains of $379,297 and total expenses of $1,142,509. Expenses included $382,247 in management fees, $127,416 in operating expenses, $270,220 in selling commissions, $347,717 in brokerage commissions and $7,984 in other expenses. At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net asset value per Unit of Series A-1 was $1,423.03 and $1,496.15, respectively, and of Series A-2 was $1,577.45 and $1,625.63, respectively.

In April, the Fund’s trading strategies produced mixed results as markets digested signs of moderating growth and concerns over European sovereign debt. Minutes from a meeting of the Fed revealed the U.S. central bank will refrain from additional stimulus unless the economy wavers, sparking concern over growth and demand for raw materials. Upticks in weekly jobless claims and weak sales of previously-owned homes added to bearish sentiment. Chinese GDP grew 8~~.1%,~~ the slowest pace in nearly three years as the country seeks to rebalance its economy away from exports and towards domestic consumption. Tenuous optimism in Europe gave way to increasing instability as austerity measures and ECB efforts to spur growth have yet to solve the regions debt woes, punctuated by S&P’s downgrade of Spanish debt. Investment flowed into safe-haven debt instruments of the U.S., Germany, and Australia in response to the weakness. The Fund’s bond exposure produced robust returns in April as investment poured into safe-haven assets on renewed euro-zone weakness and concerns over slowing growth. Spain’s soaring unemployment (24.4%), contracting GDP (-0.3%), and alarming spike in non-performing loans led to poor debt auctions as their 10-year yield climbed back above 6%. Resurging peripheral debt woes sent investors flocking to the security of German bunds (+1.9%). British Long Gilts also benefited from safe-haven inflows but performance was muted due to negative GDP growth in the U.K. Despite mixed economic signals and signs of stagnation, the U.S. maintained its favored position relative to struggling European economies, driving demand for U.S. debt. Australian debt yields fell to record lows as easing inflation data is widely expected to prompt a rate cut from the RBA at its next meeting. The Fund’s allocation to foreign exchange markets underperformed in April as markets ended little changed in volatile trade. Concerns over sovereign debt and slowing economic growth left European currencies seeking solid direction. The euro (-0.7%) fell modestly as economic indicators softened and Spain’s debt was downgraded. The Swiss franc (-0.5%) fell against the U.S. dollar after reversing early month gains. The British pound (+1.5%) gained against the U.S. dollar and the euro (+2.2%) on expectations the Bank of England will not pursue further stimulus. The Australian dollar (+1.0%) continued its position as a favored currency with the RBA keeping rates unchanged as their economy sustains growth. The Canadian dollar (1.1%) also appreciated as unemployment there fell to 7.2%. The Japanese yen (+3.8%) regained ground from its recent decline as the BOJ remained focused on easing in an effort to strengthen growth prospects. The Mexican peso (-1.5%) fell back on worries global growth concerns will dampen exports. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated moderate losses in April due to sharp reversals in the LME and COMEX copper markets. Poor U.S. monthly payroll and industrial production figures, slowing Chinese growth and heightened euro-zone debt concerns drove copper 6.6% lower to 3-month lows before being turned markedly higher on falling inventories. LME copper stockpiles dropped to 241,550 tons, the lowest level since November of 2008 and down 30% since January as miners struggle to keep pace with consumption. COMEX copper posted five consecutive gains at month’s end, its longest rally since August, to close nearly unchanged. Short positions in COMEX silver (-4.7%) helped to offset losses while COMEX gold (-0.3%) had its smallest monthly change since March of 2010 as traders waited for clarity on global economic conditions. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector yielded losses in April as encouraging U.S. manufacturing and consumer spending supported energy markets despite reduced geopolitical risk, slowing growth in China, and renewed recession fears in Europe. NYMEX crude posted its least volatile month in 17 years, trading in a 4.8% range, tightly bound by its 100 and 50-day moving averages. Weekly inventories (373 million barrels) reached an 11-month high as Chinese manufacturing contracted for the sixth straight month. Brent crude’s premium over WTI shrunk to as little as $13.61, the smallest margin since January, as Spain and the U.K. slid back into recession and negotiations with Iran showed promise. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position was relatively flat in April, as gold traded in its tightest range (4.3%) since August of 2009 due to languid investor and physical interest. Gold closed at $1,664.20/oz., just below its 200-day moving average and down 7.2% from the 2012 high.

~~Fund~~Series ~~results for 1st Quarter 2012~~B:

InNet ~~March,~~results for the ~~Fund’s~~year ~~trading~~ended ~~strategies~~December 31, ~~produced~~2012, ~~disappointing~~were ~~returns~~a asloss ~~rapidly~~of ~~shifting macroeconomic factors led to trendless and choppy market conditions~~10.5% ~~The~~in ~~U.S.~~net ~~economy~~asset ~~sustained~~value ~~momentum, adding another 227,000 jobs~~ for ~~its~~Series ~~best six~~B-~~month~~1 ~~streak~~and ~~since~~a ~~May~~loss of ~~2006~~8. ~~Retail sales climbed 1.1~~8%, ~~the most~~ in ~~five~~net ~~months,~~asset value ~~reflecting~~for ~~consumer~~Series ~~confidence despite rising gas prices~~B-2. In ~~contrast,~~this ~~commodity-driven economies such as Australia felt the effects of reduced base-metal demand~~period, ~~while~~Series ~~euro-zone~~B ~~GDP~~experienced ~~unexpectedly~~a ~~contracted~~net asdecrease ~~the~~in ~~region~~net ~~struggled~~assets tofrom ~~contain~~operations ~~its debt crisis. Crude oil declined as the impact~~ of ~~Iranian tensions receded when compared to slowing global demand and ample supplies~~$708,640. The ~~Fund’s~~2012 ~~short-term strategies produced mixed to slightly negative~~ results. ~~The~~consisted ~~Fund’s~~of ~~allocation to currency markets yielded poor results in March. The U.S. dollar (+0.5%) advanced early as improvements in the U.S. economy and positive investor sentiment drove up equities and sent~~ interest ~~rates~~income ~~modestly~~of ~~higher.~~$1,540, ~~Later~~$450 in ~~the~~other ~~month~~income, ~~Chairman~~trading ~~Bernanke~~losses of ~~the Fed reiterated his commitment to low interest rates~~$17,528 ~~pressuring the U.S. dollar~~ and ~~erasing~~total ~~previous~~expenses ~~gains. The ECB~~of ~~continued to hold the line on interest rates~~$693, ~~keeping its discount rate at 1%~~102. ~~The~~Expenses ~~euro~~included ~~and~~$211,520 ~~British~~in ~~pound~~management ~~finished~~fees, ~~unchanged~~$70,506 ~~versus~~in ~~the~~operating ~~U.S.~~expenses, ~~dollar~~$104,986 ~~after~~in ~~declines~~selling ofcommissions, ~~2%. The Australian dollar (-4.4%) fell on weak GDP~~$289,361 ~~an unexpected rise~~ in ~~unemployment,~~ asbrokerage ~~well~~commissions ~~as softening commodity exports. The Fund’s bond exposure experienced losses during a turbulent March as U.S.~~ and ~~European~~$10,890 ~~bonds sold off precipitously only to rebound later~~ in ~~the~~other ~~month~~expenses. ~~JGB~~At ~~came under pressure as the BOJ resisted calls to increase asset purchases beyond the 30 trillion yen committed at their February meeting. JGB yields rose to 1.056%~~December 31, ~~the~~2012 ~~highest~~and ~~since~~ December 31, 2011., ~~The Fund experienced negative results in~~ the ~~global equity markets in March.~~net ~~European~~asset ~~stocks~~value ~~fell~~per ~~sharply~~Unit onof ~~euro-zone~~Series ~~GDP contraction (~~B-~~0.3%)~~1 ~~before~~was ~~optimistic U~~$1,110.S.58 ~~data~~and ~~helped lift futures to 8-month highs~~$1,241.61, ~~Markets~~respectively, ~~quickly reversed on China’s shrinking economy~~ and ~~the~~of ~~possible~~Series ~~need for further Greek debt restructuring. The FTSE (~~B-2~~.1%),~~ ~~Amsterdam~~was ~~EOE Index (-~~$1~~.2%)~~,187.13 and ~~Euro Stoxx (-4.5%) all finished lower. The Dow (+~~$1,300.~~2%) and the S&P 500 (+2.5%) rose to four-year highs. Asian shares were mostly lower~~90, ~~pressured by the slowdown in China~~respectively. ~~China’s H-Shares (-10.9%) sank on weaker-than-expected~~

12Fund results for 4th Quarter 2012:

~~Table~~In December, the Fund’s strategies ended 2012 on a positive note with gains despite the uncertainty resulting from U.S. budgetary negotiations. The Fund’s allocations to currency markets profited in December as trends in the euro and yen persisted. The U.S. dollar was lower against major currencies due to the increasing threat of ~~Contents~~fiscal cliff tax increases and spending cuts. The euro remained relatively strong as the ECB again held the line on interest rates and the recent recovery in equity markets boosted confidence. The British pound also gained despite the relative weakness of the U.K. economy. The Fund’s models generated positive returns in global equity indices in December as tensions over European finances eased. The Fund’s positions in the bond sector resulted in loss in December as U.S. fiscal cliff negotiations continued to drive market movement. Fiscal cliff uncertainty, expectations for poor U.S. employment data, and downbeat euro-zone forecasts drove global yields lower at the start of December. The addition of 146,000 jobs and the Fed’s expansion of the third round of quantitative easing (“QE3”) reversed the trend as investors turned to risk. The Fund’s grain positions generated losses in December after China canceled U.S. soybean purchases and favorable weather in South America increased harvest expectations. Soybeans and soybean by-products initially climbed to a one-month high, aided by solid exports and crush data. Soybean markets were then abruptly sent lower as China canceled purchases totaling 840,000 metric tons. The Fund’s short-term strategies produced mixed returns with gains in stocks and metals and losses in energies. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position negatively affected performance in December as anxieties surrounding U.S. fiscal cliff budget negotiations and signs of recovery in the U.S. housing market reduced both commodity and safe-haven demand for gold.

In ~~housing~~November, ~~and~~the ~~auto~~Fund’s ~~data~~strategies ~~with~~produced ~~stocks~~disappointing inresults ~~Singapore~~as ~~(-1~~U.~~1%),~~S. ~~Taiwan~~budgetary ~~(-2.5%)~~negotiations injected headline risk and ~~India~~volatility ~~(-2.3%)~~across ~~also~~market ~~lower~~sectors. The ~~Nikkei~~Fund’s ~~(+1.5%) managed~~allocation to ~~gain~~long-term interest rates generated positive results in November as ~~the~~U.S. ~~BOJ~~budgetary ~~continued~~concerns tolifted ~~ease~~bond inprices. anFiscal ~~effort~~cliff anxieties drove U.S. 30-year bonds to ~~boost growth~~all-time ~~and~~highs, ~~weaken~~settling ~~the~~up ~~yen~~1.2%. German bunds, Europe’s preeminent safe-haven instrument, also reached all-time highs. The Fund’s allocation ~~grains~~to ~~positions~~currencies ~~experienced~~produced ~~moderate~~positive ~~losses~~returns ~~for~~in November as U.S. dollar weakness continued with the ~~month~~Fed intent on keeping interest rates extremely low. ~~Directionless~~The ~~trading~~euro ~~led~~fell toversus ~~losses~~the inU.S. ~~corn~~dollar ~~and~~before ~~wheat~~rebounding ~~while~~late ~~trending~~as ~~soybeans~~the ~~benefited~~ECB ~~long~~kept ~~soybean~~rates ~~meal~~unchanged and ~~positions~~European equities strengthened. The Fund’s ~~exposure~~positions ~~to the~~in metals ~~sectors~~failed ~~generated~~to ~~moderate~~perform ~~losses~~in November as ~~precious~~bearish ~~metals~~trends ~~declined~~reversed on ~~increasingly~~hopes ~~positive~~for ~~sentiment~~additional ~~surrounding~~fiscal ~~the~~stimulus, ~~stability~~alternative ofinvestment ~~the~~demand ~~global~~and ~~economy~~accelerating growth in China. The Fund’s energies ~~allocation~~positions ~~to money market futures~~ also produced negative results~~. Short-rate~~ ~~price~~in ~~movement~~November, ~~closely~~as ~~mirrored~~crude ~~the~~prices ~~volatility~~edged ~~seen~~up inafter ~~longer-term~~the ~~maturities~~breakout asof ~~central~~hostilities ~~banks~~between ~~continued~~Israel toand ~~hold~~Hamas ~~overnight~~and ~~lending~~ongoing ~~rates~~political ~~between~~tensions 0in Syria and 25Iran ~~basis~~injected ~~points~~risk premium into energies. ~~Although~~After ~~targeted~~climbing as ~~rates~~much ~~are~~as ~~expected~~5.6%, tonatural ~~remain~~gas ~~near~~plummeted ~~zero~~late ~~for~~on an ~~extended~~ ~~period,~~unexpected ~~the~~gain ~~strength~~in ofU.S. ~~the~~stockpiles ~~equity~~due ~~rally~~to ~~precipitated~~unusually amild ~~decline~~winter weather in ~~global~~the ~~short-rate~~northern ~~prices,~~hemisphere. ~~negatively~~Natural ~~impacting~~gas ~~the~~finished ~~Fund’s~~down ~~long~~6.8% ~~positions~~in volatile trade. The Fund’s ~~perpetual~~short-term ~~long~~strategies ~~gold~~yielded positive ~~position~~returns ~~underperformed~~ in ~~March~~interest asrates ~~investors~~and ~~exited~~equities ~~the precious~~while ~~metal~~underperforming in ~~exchange for risk~~energies. The ~~steady~~Fund’s ~~pace~~perpetual oflong ~~upbeat~~gold ~~economic~~position ~~reports~~produced inmodest ~~the~~negative ~~U.S.,~~returns ~~including~~in ~~consumer~~November ~~spending~~as ~~and~~rapidly ~~confidence,~~changing ~~fed~~expectations ~~growing~~for ~~optimism~~a ~~over~~U.S. ~~the~~budget ~~stability~~deal ofinjected volatility into the ~~world’s~~gold ~~largest economy~~market.

In ~~February~~October, the Fund’s ~~trading~~ strategies ~~generated~~produced ~~solid~~disappointing ~~returns~~results as ~~geopolitical~~encouraging ~~and~~ economic ~~forces~~data ~~pushed energies and equities~~supported ~~decidedly~~equities ~~higher.~~while ~~Intensifying~~commodity ~~tensions~~demand ~~with~~remained ~~Iran~~tepid. ~~over~~The ~~their~~Fund’s ~~nuclear~~equity ~~program~~positions ~~injected~~generated ~~risk~~mixed ~~premium~~results ~~into~~in ~~oil~~October. ~~markets,~~While ~~driving~~economic ~~crude~~conditions ~~prices~~remained tochallenging ~~multi-month~~across ~~highs. Meanwhile~~Europe, aequities ~~wave~~finished ofmodestly ~~hopeful~~higher on improved economic data. ~~and~~Equities in the ~~long-awaited~~east ~~second~~were ~~Greek~~mixed ~~bailout lifted~~as ~~stocks.~~uncertainty ~~U.S.~~drove ~~unemployment~~investor ~~fell for a fifth straight month, adding 234,000 jobs while U~~sentiment.S. ~~consumer~~Chinese ~~confidence~~H-Shares ~~posted its longest streak of gains since 1997~~(+7.6%) rose ~~The~~as ~~Nasdaq~~GDP ~~hit 11-year highs~~ and ~~the~~retail ~~Dow~~sales ~~closed~~surpassed ~~above 13,000 for the first time since 2008~~expectations. The ~~BOJ~~South ~~revealed~~Korean ~~plans~~Kospi to(-5.2%) ~~inject~~fell 10as ~~trillion~~growth ~~yen~~remained ~~into~~sluggish ~~the Japanese economy in an effort to suppress deflation~~ while the ~~ECB~~Nikkei ~~sought to stabilize euro-zone banks and stimulate the economy by issuing €529~~(+0.5%) ~~billion~~rose ~~of low interest loans.~~on ~~CBOT~~anticipated ~~corn~~government ~~slid sideways awaiting spring plantings, while soybeans soared on expected crop damage in Brazil~~stimulus. ~~Short-term strategies enhanced overall performance with gains in currencies, stocks, metals, and energies.~~ The Fund’s ~~allocation~~allocations to ~~the energy~~long-term ~~sector~~interest ~~produced~~rates ~~significant~~underperformed ~~returns~~ in ~~February~~October as ~~economic~~European ~~optimism,~~peripheral ~~escalating~~woes ~~Iranian~~created ~~tensions, and reduced refinery capacity led to robust returns for long energy positions. Extreme cold in Europe in the midst of heavy refinery maintenance drove IPE gas oil (+6.3%) to~~ a ~~nine~~risk-~~month high. New York heating oil (+6.0%)~~on, ~~also~~risk-off ~~used in home heating~~environment, ~~was~~while ~~pulled~~economic ~~higher~~data onin ~~anticipated demand shift to~~ the U.S. ~~Brent~~pressured ~~crude~~treasury ~~gained 10~~futures.~~9%,~~ ~~its best month since May of 2009, while NY~~The ~~crude~~Fund’s ~~(+8.6%) reached~~positions ain ~~nine-month~~the ~~high.~~metals ~~Despite~~sector ~~poor~~underperformed ~~U.S.~~in ~~gasoline~~October ~~demand,~~as ~~RBOB~~prospects ~~futures~~for ~~extended~~additional anstimulus ~~impressive~~measures ~~rally,~~diminished ~~gaining 5.4%, aided by permanent, unplanned,~~ and ~~seasonal~~the ~~refinery closures. Promising~~ U.S. ~~employment~~dollar ~~data and the Greek bailout approval lifted energies universally on hopes of economic growth~~firmed. The ~~Fund~~Fed ~~experienced~~avoided ~~positive~~addressing ~~results~~the inapproaching ~~global~~expiration ~~equity~~of ~~markets~~their asOperation ~~stocks~~Twist ~~rose on continued economic improvement. While Europe worked its way towards the second bailout of Greece~~program, reducing ~~equity~~demand ~~markets~~for ~~across~~gold ~~the~~and ~~continent~~silver ~~were higher~~ as ~~fears~~inflation ~~of an imminent euro-zone collapse subsided~~hedges. ~~The~~COMEX ~~ECB~~copper ~~eased~~and ~~monetary~~LME ~~policy~~aluminum ~~significantly~~declined ~~in an effort to support markets, stepping away from its traditional mandate of inflation stability~~6. ~~Markets responded with the CAC40 (+~~4.5%), ~~FTSE (+3.7%)~~ and ~~DAX (+6~~9.08%~~) all~~ ~~finishing~~respectively ~~the~~as ~~month higher. Only~~ the ~~Greek~~debt ~~index~~crisis ~~finished~~continued ~~lower~~to ~~with~~weigh aon ~~9.1%~~world ~~loss~~economies. ~~Investor~~The ~~optimism~~Fund’s ~~drove~~energy upportfolio ~~markets~~underperformed ~~across~~in ~~Asia~~October ~~with the Nikkei~~as ~~(+10.2%) climbing~~markets ~~sharply~~gave asback ~~the~~recent ~~yen fell~~gains. ~~Improvements~~Crude inoil ~~the~~fell ~~outlook~~another ~~for exports also boosted shares in Hong Kong (+6.6%), Korea (+3.5%) and Taiwan (+~~7.6%). ~~The U.S. markets rose~~ as ~~unemployment~~the ~~fell~~global toeconomy ~~8.3%,~~remained ~~jobless claims hit a four-year low, and modest growth was seen in manufacturing and housing~~weak. The ~~S&P 500 (+4.3%) is off to its best start in 21 years. The~~ Fund’s ~~allocation~~allocations to ~~currencies~~foreign exchange markets generated moderate ~~losses~~gains ~~due~~as to the ~~sharp reversal in the Japanese yen. The~~ U.S. dollar ~~was~~fluctuated ~~weaker~~relative ~~against~~to ~~most~~world ~~global~~ currencies ~~as the Fed reiterated its highly accommodative stance in spite of improving economic conditions~~. The ~~BOJ, which has struggled with deflation for more than a decade, announced it would~~British ~~target~~pound awas 1%steady ~~annual inflation rate, adding 10 trillion yen to the economy in the process. Traders took the news seriously and sent the yen (-6.2%) to a seven-month low. The euro (+1.9%) strengthened~~ against the U.S. dollar as ~~fears~~GDP ~~over a Greek debt disaster abated and expectations~~ rose ~~for increased lending activity. The Swiss franc (+~~1.80%~~) and~~, ~~British~~taking ~~pound (+1.1%) also gained while better-than-expected economic data in Australia drove~~ the ~~AUD/USD rate to a six-month high (1~~U.~~0795 $/AUD)~~K. ~~South~~out ~~American~~of ~~currencies~~recessionary ~~continued to climb with the Mexican peso (+1~~territory.~~4%),~~ ~~Colombian~~The ~~peso~~Euro (+20.~~4%), and the Brazilian real (+1.~~7%) ~~all~~ ~~gaining.~~rose ~~The~~modestly ~~Fund’s bond portfolio produced negative results in February. U.S. bond prices retreated slightly from January highs~~ as ~~positive economic data continued to foster~~ the ~~strongest~~ECB ~~equity~~took ~~rally~~no ~~in two decades. U.S. unemployment dropped to 8.3%~~action, ~~returning~~citing toelevated abut ~~level~~acceptable ~~not~~levels ~~seen~~of ~~since February 2009~~inflation. ~~U.S. 10-year notes retreated on the news and ended the month down 0.8%.~~ The ~~ECB~~Australian ~~implemented~~dollar ~~phase~~weakened ~~two of their long term refinancing operation liquidity program on February 27, injecting 530 billion euros of short-term liquidity into~~ as the ~~region.~~RBA ~~The~~unexpectedly 1%cut ~~loan~~rates ~~offering was taken up~~ by ~~800~~25 ~~euro-zone~~bps ~~banks. The monetary infusion is expected~~ to ~~make its way into longer-term maturities as seen by the resulting rally in bunds and 10-year Swap Notes~~3.25% ~~The~~before ~~Fund’s~~a ~~strategies~~sharp ~~underperformed~~climb in the metals sector after bullish trends in precious metals radically corrected as Fed Chairman Bernanke quelled hopes for QE3. Immediately prior to the plunge, gold and silver each hit multi-month highs as investors placed hedges against rising consumer prices ~~and a weakening U.S. dollar. Following Mr. Bernanke’s testimony, gold~~ (-+1.74%) dampened ~~and~~expectations ~~silver (-6.9%) decreased significantly. Fears of reduced euro-zone base metal demand abated as leaders came to agreement on a second aid package~~ for ~~Greece.~~further ~~LME aluminum (+4~~easing.~~0%),~~ ~~assisted~~The byFund’s ~~record canceled warrants (orders to withdraw stockpiles), reversed early losses in the broad~~short-~~based~~term ~~rally.~~strategies ~~Rising~~yielded ~~confidence~~mixed ~~levels~~returns onwith ~~both~~gains ~~sides~~currencies ~~of the Atlantic~~ and ~~falling~~losses ~~inventories worked~~ in ~~tandem to elevate COMEX~~metals ~~(+2.1%)~~ and ~~LME~~interest ~~copper (+2~~rates.~~2%).~~ The Fund’s perpetual long gold position ~~suffered~~negatively ~~late-month~~impacted ~~losses~~performance asin ~~testimony~~October ~~from~~as ~~Mr. Bernanke~~signs ~~expressed optimism over improving macroeconomic data, reducing the likelihood~~ of ~~additional~~economic ~~monetary stimulus.~~stability ~~Gold~~reduced ~~and~~precious ~~other~~metal ~~safe-havens dropped on the news as the U~~demand.S. ~~dollar rallied.~~

In9 January, the Fund’s strategies produced mixed results as optimism toward a European debt resolution and positive economic growth indicators led investors to add risk. The U.S. dollar declined against major currencies as the “safety trade” unwound, accelerated by the Fed’s stated willingness to purchase additional bonds. Gold benefited from the dollar’s decline, posting a +10% gain, climbing solidly back above its 200-day moving average while base-metals surged on production cutbacks and anticipated

~~Table~~For the fourth quarter of ~~Contents~~2012, the most profitable market group overall was the currencies sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the metals sector.

Chinese demand. EU negotiations with Greece, initially promising, weighed on equity markets towards month-end as leaders debated terms of a second rescue package worth 500 billion euro. NYMEX gasoline trended higher throughout the month as supply concerns intensified due to multiple refinery closures while natural gas plummeted to a 10-year low on unseasonably warm winter temperatures and overabundant supply. The Fund’s ~~short-term strategies~~results ~~contributed positively to performance with gains in bonds, stocks, and metals, while the Fund’s perpetual long gold position produced significant gains~~ for ~~the~~3rd ~~month.~~Quarter ~~The~~2012: Fund’s allocation to money market futures yielded robust returns as central banks universally maintained accommodative monetary policies. In the United States, minutes from the FOMC revealed the Fed’s commitment to maintain interest rates at or near zero through 2014. The ECB, having cut rates twice in the last three months, maintained rates at a record low of 1%, citing signs of stabilization. In the U.K., the Bank of England also maintained a record low benchmark of 0.5%. The Fund’s allocation to currency markets yielded negative returns as the U.S. dollar reversed its recent uptrend as global economic concerns began to subside. What had been a flight to safety in the U.S. dollar in late 2011 reversed as investors chose risk exposure and yield over conservation. The euro reached a 17-month low before recovering on perceived EU debt negotiation progress. The Australian dollar sustained its climb on relative economic outperformance, attractive interest rates, and strength in commodity prices. South American currencies, which lost significant ground in 2011, advanced considerably against the U.S. dollar. The Japanese yen rallied sharply late, closing at a three-month high, as investors flocked to the currency given the short-term U.S. interest rate outlook. The Fund’s grain positions experienced moderate losses for the month. Lingering concerns over South American corn and soybean yields drove grains to multi-week highs before surprisingly bearish USDA figures abruptly reversed trends. The highly anticipated January USDA report caused significant declines mid-month on unexpected increases in corn production and inventories, resulting in losses for the Fund’s corn positions. Wheat traded in tandem with corn, pressured by weak exports, ample supply, and favorable winter crop conditions. The Fund’s exposure to the energy sector generated positive returns, led by long gasoline and short natural gas positions. Gasoline ended up (+7.3%) for the month, while an unusually warm winter and continued supply glut pushed natural gas to $2.231/btu, a 10-year low. The Fund experienced losses in NYMEX crude oil amid a directionless trade as prices were range-bound between $98 and $103 per barrel. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position produced sizable gains after the FOMC announced that interest rates would remain low through 2014, sparking U.S. dollar worries. The ongoing EU debt crisis also continues to keep the euro weak. The instability associated with these currencies provided strong support for safe-haven assets.

~~For~~In September, the ~~first~~Fund’s ~~quarter~~managed futures trading strategy produced negative results as the expansion of ~~2012~~accommodative policies by central bankers led investors to add risk. The Fund’s bond positions produced moderate losses in September as central bank intervention drove market movement. German bund yields climbed sharply as the ECB’s plan to purchase Italian and Spanish debt reduced safe-haven demand. The BOJ also eased, adding 10 trillion yen to its existing asset purchase program, suppressing JGB yields. The Fund’s allocation to currencies underperformed in September as the ~~most~~U.S. ~~profitable~~dollar ~~market~~lost ~~group~~ground against ~~overall~~all ~~was~~major currencies in response to the ~~energy~~Fed stimulus. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector ~~while~~generated positive results in September as plans for open-ended asset purchases by U.S. and European central bankers and new infrastructure spending in China lifted both precious and base metal alike. The Fund’s allocations to the ~~greatest~~energies sector yielded disappointing results in September as the 30% climb in crude since June abruptly reversed on demand concerns and a build in supplies. Saudi Arabia’s commitment to increase production, concern over a Spanish bailout and a reduced profit outlook from economic bellwether Fedex sent prices lower. The Fund’s short-term strategies posted mixed results with gains in metals and losses ~~were~~in ~~attributable~~currencies. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position produced strong results as investors flocked to ~~positions~~gold in order to hedge away inflation risk brought on by the currency ~~sector~~debasing polices of the ECB and the Fed. Gold’s attraction as a value store drove it 5.1% higher, reaching a 6-month high ($1,787/Troy oz). The quarterly gain of 11% was its best since June of 2010.

~~2011~~In August, apart from its perpetual long gold position, the Fund’s strategies produced moderately disappointing results as guidance from central bankers increased investor appetite for risk. Energy markets rallied markedly, lifted by U.S. and euro-zone optimism, heightened tensions in the Middle East, and the falling U.S. dollar. The drought gripping the U.S. Midwest drove corn and soybean to all-time highs. The Fund’s positions in equities underperformed in August as European leaders worked to improve the region’s fiscal position, reducing anxiety over euro-zone debt issues. ECB president Mario Draghi’s late July statement that the he would do “whatever it takes” to preserve the euro proved to be the driving force behind a rally in European equity markets. U.S. equities rallied in tandem with Europe, aided by a series of positive economic data, with the S&P 500 reaching a four-year high. The Fund’s bond positions posted disappointing results in August as U.S. treasuries sold off steadily throughout the first half of the month in response to positive economic data and euro-zone optimism. Reduced demand for safe-haven assets lifted U.S. 10-year note yields to an intraday three-month high of 1.86% before falling after Fed minutes alluded to the possible need for further stimulus. The Fund’s positions in the energies sector benefited in August as the uptrend in the crude oil complex that began in July continued. Natural gas prices fell back sharply, -12.8% to $2.799 per million btu, as the supply glut rose still further and temperatures moderated. The Fund's allocation to currencies produced negative results in August. High expectations on the latest ECB meeting went unmet as little new information was revealed and rates were left unchanged. Both the euro (+2.2%) and British pound (+1.3%) gained ground versus the U.S. dollar. The Fund’s short-term strategies underperformed with losses in equities, energies and currencies. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position posted strong gains in August as gold regained its preferred status as an inflationary hedge. Gold had its best month since January, gaining 4.6%.

~~Series~~In A:July, the Fund’s trading strategies returned to positive territory as capital preservation was the primary goal for investors. The Fund’s equity positions underperformed in July. Volatility persisted as the overhang of European economic difficulties and slowing global growth continued to weigh on markets. In the U.S., the Dow (+1.1%) was supported by a drop in jobless claims and encouraging durable goods data. In China (+1.1%), slowing growth prompted a second cut to its key lending rate while Japanese stocks (-3.7%) lost ground, pressured by the yen’s appreciation. The Fund’s bond positions were profitable in July as investors poured money into safe-haven debt instruments despite record low yields. The Fund’s allocation to short-term interest rates generated positive returns in July as markets welcomed action from the ECB while looking to the Fed to follow suit. The ECB cut its benchmark lending rate to a record low of 0.75% and its overnight deposit rate to 0% in an effort to stave off recession. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced moderate gains in July as global economic uncertainly drove money flows into safe-haven sovereign currencies at the expense of the euro. The yen maintained its favored status, up 7.2% since mid-March, while the Aussie dollar (+2.9%) also remained strong. The Fund’s strategies produced strong returns in grains in July as the U.S. Midwest experienced its worst drought in nearly six decades. As of July 30th, only 25% of the crop was in good condition, the lowest since 1988. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector underperformed in July as COMEX gold continued to trade in a narrow range and global instability hurt base metal demand. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector yielded disappointing results in July as crude oil mounted a rally from the dramatic decline over the last several months. Natural gas (+13.6%) rebounded further from lows as hot weather drove up cooling demand from utilities. The Fund’s short-term strategies produced mixed results with gains in interest rates and losses in metals. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position posted modest gains in July as gold remained bound to its established trading range, crossing the $1,600/troy oz. level ten times since early May.

~~Net~~For ~~results for~~ the ~~year~~ ~~ended~~third ~~December 31,~~quarter ~~2011, were a loss~~ of ~~4.5% in net asset value for Series A-1 and a loss of 2.7% in net asset value for Series A-2. In this period~~2012, ~~Series~~the Amost ~~experienced~~profitable amarket ~~net~~group ~~decrease~~overall inwas ~~net~~the ~~assets~~money ~~from~~market ~~operations~~sector ofwhile ~~$1,021,393.~~the ~~This~~greatest ~~net decrease~~losses consisted of interest income of $6,191, trading gains of $353,540 and total expenses of $1,381,124. Expenses included $383,509 in management fees, $127,836 in operating expenses, $272,237 in selling commissions, $243,449 in incentive fees,were ~~$255,210 in brokerage commissions, $93,232~~ attributable to ~~the~~positions ~~MF Global reserve and $5,651~~ in ~~other expenses. At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,~~ the ~~net~~currencies ~~asset value per Unit of Series A-1 was $1,496~~sector.15 ~~and $1,566.65, respectively, and of Series A-2 was $1,625.63 and $1,671.00, respectively.~~

~~Series~~10 B:

Fund results for ~~4th~~2nd Quarter ~~2011~~2012:

In ~~December~~June, the Fund’s trading strategies ~~posted~~yielded disappointing results as ~~macroeconomic~~market ~~factors~~sensitivity ~~continued~~to European debt crisis news led to ~~shake~~choppy market ~~markets,~~conditions. ~~resulting~~Commodity demand remained weak as supplies build in ~~another~~base metals and energies. The Fund’s allocation to equities underperformed in June due to volatile ~~month~~and ofdirectionless trading as European economic conditions weighed on global markets. ~~Equities~~The ~~finished~~Fund’s bond portfolio experienced losses in June as the ~~year on~~recent rally stagnated due to a ~~small~~lack ~~upswing~~of assubstantial ~~positive~~central ~~economic~~bank ~~news~~stimulus. Investors hoping for new asset purchases from the ~~U.S.~~Fed ~~elevated~~were ~~markets~~disappointed ~~from~~as they chose only to expand their ~~intra-month~~Operation ~~lows~~Twist ~~despite~~program ~~the~~by ~~European~~$267 ~~debt~~billion. ~~crisis~~Europe’s ~~continuing~~bond rally also retreated as area-wide interest rates climbed in response to ~~weigh~~the ~~heavily~~increasingly oninsolvent ~~global~~Spanish ~~markets~~banking sector. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced negative results in June as the U.S. dollar ~~trended~~declined ~~higher~~versus major currencies. The Fund’s grain allocations generated moderate losses in June as hot and dry conditions in the U.S. threatened to damage the ~~detriment~~largest ofprojected ~~gold,~~corn ~~with~~crop since ~~gold~~1937. December ~~futures~~corn ~~trading~~surged ~~below~~21.6% as the ~~200-day~~market ~~moving~~digested ~~average~~rapidly deteriorating crop conditions. ~~Grains~~The ~~rallied~~Fund’s aspositions ~~reduced~~in ~~yields~~the ~~for~~metals ~~soybeans~~sector ~~and~~generated ~~corn~~moderately ~~drove~~negative ~~prices~~results ~~higher~~in ~~while~~June ~~soft~~as ~~commodities’~~gains ~~values~~in ~~remained~~short ~~suppressed~~base onmetal ~~steady~~positions ~~output~~were offset by losses in range-bound COMEX gold (-0.4%). ~~Meanwhile,~~Demand for base metals ~~lagged~~has suffered as ~~stockpiles of~~Chinese ~~aluminum~~growth ~~increased~~slowed toand ~~record~~the ~~highs~~broader ~~while~~world ~~demand~~economy ~~for~~failed ~~copper~~to ~~decreased~~show significant signs of recovery. ~~Crude~~After ~~oil~~spending ~~experienced~~nearly athe ~~volatile~~entire ~~trade~~month ~~with~~in ~~growing~~negative ~~tensions~~territory, ~~between~~however, base ~~the~~metals ~~U.S.~~took ~~and~~part ~~Iran~~in ~~threatening~~a toglobal ~~disrupt~~rally ~~the~~spurred ~~oil~~by ~~supply~~European leaders’ agreement on short-term measures to assist Spanish banks. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector ~~yielded~~ ~~losses~~produced gains in ~~December~~June as ~~conflicting~~weak ~~macroeconomic~~demand ~~factors~~and ~~injected~~ample ~~volatility~~supplies ~~into~~pushed prices lower. Global economic weakness continued to be the ~~markets~~key driver of prices near-term as slowing global growth hurt overall energy demand. AThe ~~modest~~Fund’s ~~improvement~~short-term trading strategies underperformed in UJune.S. ~~economic~~The ~~data,~~Fund’s ~~including~~perpetual ~~positive~~long ~~job~~gold position ~~reports,~~posted ~~supported~~disappointing ~~energy~~results ~~prices~~in ~~and~~June ~~helped~~as ~~sustain~~conflicting ~~crude~~market to influences produced trendless trading.

14In May, the Fund’s trading strategies produced strong results as uncertainty and eroding optimism dominated market sentiment, sending investors on a broad-based flight to safety. Falling business confidence in Germany, rising euro-zone unemployment, and a shrinking manufacturing sector led to dramatic risk reduction across all sectors. The Fund’s equity positions excelled in May as markets fell sharply on weakening economic conditions. The Fund’s bond exposure returned substantial profits in May as the risk-off trade prevailed in response to the unresolved debt crisis in Europe. Elevated fears that Greece may leave the euro-zone and an increasingly troubled Spanish banking sector combined to lift borrowing costs for at-risk sovereigns. Fear-driven investment poured into safe-haven assets in Germany, the U.S., and Australia. The Fund’s allocations to currencies yielded strong results in May as the U.S. dollar advanced sharply in a general flight to safety. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated significant gains in May. Precious and industrial metals fell as a risk-off mentality began to permeate futures markets once again on renewed fears of a global economic recession. All base metals, with the exception of zinc, established new lows for 2012 in May, as did COMEX gold (-6.1%) and silver (-10.3%). The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector produced robust gains, benefitting from the sharp decline in the petroleum complex as ample supply and slack demand pressured prices. In natural gas, the well-established down-trend was finally broken as multi-year lows spurred buying interest. Mild spring weather and warm near-term forecasts helped support prices on increased cooling needs. The Fund’s short-term models enhanced monthly gains with profitable positions in CME Australian dollar, COMEX gold and CBT U.S. T-Bonds. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position underperformed in May as gold experienced its worst month in 11 years. Investors concerned over the European debt crisis favored the perceived safety of the U.S. dollar over alternative assets such as precious metals.

~~Table~~In April, the Fund’s trading strategies produced mixed results as markets digested signs of ~~Contents~~moderating growth and concerns over European sovereign debt. The Fund’s bond exposure produced robust returns in April as investment poured into safe-haven assets on renewed euro-zone weakness and concerns over slowing growth. Despite mixed economic signals and signs of stagnation, the U.S. maintained its favored position relative to struggling European economies, driving demand for U.S. debt. The Fund’s allocation to foreign exchange markets underperformed in April as markets ended little changed in volatile trade. Concerns over sovereign debt and slowing economic growth left European currencies seeking solid direction. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated moderate losses in April due to sharp reversals in the LME and COMEX copper markets. Poor U.S. monthly payroll and industrial production figures, slowing Chinese growth and heightened euro-zone debt concerns drove copper 6.6% lower to 3-month lows before being turned markedly higher on falling inventories. Short positions in COMEX silver (-4.7%) helped to offset losses while COMEX gold (-0.3%) had its smallest monthly change since March of 2010 as traders waited for clarity on global economic conditions. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector yielded losses in April as encouraging U.S. manufacturing and consumer spending supported energy markets despite reduced geopolitical risk, slowing growth in China, and renewed recession fears in Europe. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position was relatively flat in April, as gold traded in its tightest range (4.3%) since August of 2009.

just above the $100 per barrel. These increases, however, were reversed as proposed EU summit resolutions were viewed as insufficient to produce significant growth in Europe, resulting in multi-week lows. Calls for sanctions against Iran and the potential interruption to Middle Eastern supplies abruptly halted the slide and sent crude markets higher at the end of the month. For the month, natural gas (-16.5%) remained heavily bearish as a result of above-normal temperatures across the upper Midwest and East Coast and reported inventories significantly above the five-year average. The Fund experienced negative results in the metals markets in December as gains made in base metals were offset by losses in gold. The European debt crisis and related demand concerns significantly impacted metals prices over the second ~~half~~quarter of the year. Short positions in aluminum (-4.27%) prospered as fears of a recession in the euro-zone weakened demand for the base metal and as aluminum inventories increased to record levels. Copper also suffered from similar demand concerns as data out of China2012, the ~~world’s~~most ~~largest~~profitable user of the metal, indicated stockpiles increased while industrial output slowed. Silver (-14.9%) hit a four-month low after a sell-off spurred by Euro concerns. Meanwhile, gold (-10.5%) dropped below its 200-day moving average mid-month for the first time in over two years. The Fund’s money market ~~positions~~group ~~yielded~~overall ~~negative~~was ~~returns in December. Short-term interest rates remained on~~ the ~~decline~~bonds assector investors continued to favor the safety of money markets. Rates rose slightly from their lows throughout December as the ECB continued attempting to add liquidity to the markets by increasing access to its lending facilities. The U.S. also maintained its own easy monetary policy in order to boost liquidity and support economic recovery. The Fund’s money market positions declined slightly as money markets fell back near the end of the month. The Fund’s bond portfolio produced modest losses in December as external factors disrupted prices. While a mid-month auction of U.S. notes displayed its strongest demand since 1993, European political and central bank decisions drove prices lower. U.S. 10-year T-Note futures (+1.4%) gained on the month while ~~2-year T-Notes remained flat. In Europe, German bund prices dipped after~~ the ~~ECB’s~~greatest decision to lend €489 billion to capitalize insolvent European banks. In Asia, Korean T-Bonds trended higher in early December before dropping significantly after Kim Jong-Il’s death, ending nearly flat in December. The Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold position posted significant losses inwere ~~December~~attributable ~~as demand for the asset was weakened by the ongoing European debt crisis. New liquidity concerns forced some banks~~ to ~~sell~~positions ~~off precious metals~~ in ~~favor of cash. Gold fell 10.5% during December, its second largest monthly loss since October 2008 and finished~~ the ~~year~~grains 18sector.~~43%~~ ~~off its record high in September this year. Despite the decline this month, 2011 marked the 11th consecutive year of gains for gold.~~

~~In November, the~~ Fund’s ~~trading~~results ~~strategies underperformed as the continuing euro-zone debt crisis resulted in high market volatility and left investors searching~~ for ~~safe~~1st ~~haven~~Quarter ~~investments.~~2012: Indices pared early heavy losses by month’s end as a coordinated effort by central banks in the euro-zone, the U.S., Canada, Switzerland, the U.K. and Japan to lower the cost of dollar funding gave much needed optimism to the markets. Bond yields rose significantly higher in Europe and Japan, with Germany unable to sell nearly a third of its bund offering and the Japanese benchmark 10-year Japanese Government Bond’s high yields making borrowing potentially unsustainable. The U.S. dollar resumed its status as a safe haven currency in November as investors reallocated from gold and the Swiss franc. Overall, the metals sector moved lower to the benefit of the Fund’s positions as global demand concerns from the euro-zone debt crisis along with slowing Chinese economic growth suppressed prices. Strong U.S. Thanksgiving retail sales and an increase in consumer confidence drove crude oil to over $100 per barrel. The Fund’s short-term strategies performed poorly as gains in energies were offset by losses in currencies and short rates. The Fund’s allocation to currencies experienced significant losses in November as the U.S. dollar reversed sharply as investors sought a safe haven currency in the face of global market turmoil. The U.S. dollar rose sharply against almost every global currency as uncertainty over the sovereign debt of some European nations continued to shake markets. The euro, Swiss franc, Canadian dollar and Brazilian real all finished with losses against the U.S. dollar with only the Japanese yen finishing with a modest gain as that currency drifted higher after last month’s late intervention. The Fund experienced strong gains in the global energy markets in November with long crude oil and short natural gas positions leading the way. Both NYMEX and Brent Crude rallied into month-end on record U.S. Thanksgiving retail sales, strong consumer confidence and a proposed ban on EU imports of Iranian oil. U.S. domestic crude stocks fell to 330.8 million barrels in November, the lowest level since January 2010, propelling crude 32% higher since early October while reaching $100 a barrel for the first time since July. The Fund’s bond portfolio produced losses in November as uncertainty over the euro-zone’s credit worthiness drove European yields to significant highs. Euro-zone uncertainty also lowered yields in the U.S. for most of November before a decision by central banks around the world to cut the U.S. dollar overnight index-swap rate reversed some of the U.S. 30-year note’s price increases in November. Japanese yields spiked at the end of November just days before a critical 2-year, 2.7 trillion Japanese yen offering. The Fund’s allocation to global equity markets yielded modest negative returns in November. Equity markets around the globe declined sharply early in the month as policy makers continued to search for solutions to growing economic tensions. Global markets moved up sharply late in the month, however, punctuated by news of a 6-nation coordinated central bank action aimed at easing strains within the banking system. As a result, significant early-month negative returns in Italy, Spain, Germany and Japan were pared, while the U.S. experienced positive returns for November despite large early-November losses. The Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold position (+1.2%) continued October’s rally early in November as the European debt crisis continued to worry investors and increase demand for safer assets. However, the weakening Euro reversed this trend for most of the month before central banks around the world began a coordinated effort to provide additional loans to the ECB, instantly propelling gold 2.0% higher at month’s end.

In ~~October~~March, the Fund’s trading strategies ~~posted~~produced disappointing ~~results~~returns as ~~renewed~~rapidly ~~optimism~~shifting ~~precipitated~~macroeconomic afactors ~~return~~led to ~~risk~~trendless ~~after~~and choppy ~~September~~market conditions. The Fund’s ~~historic~~allocation ~~liquidation.~~to ~~Indices~~currency ~~led~~markets ~~the~~yielded ~~way~~poor ~~higher,~~results ~~posting~~in ~~impressive~~March. ~~gains~~The U.S. dollar (+0.5%) advanced early as ~~strong~~improvements in the U.S. ~~corporate~~economy ~~earnings~~ and ~~GDP~~positive ~~figures~~investor sentiment drove up equities and asent interest ~~preliminary~~rates ~~debt~~modestly ~~crisis~~higher. ~~agreement~~Later in ~~Europe~~the ~~sent~~month ~~values~~Chairman ~~higher.~~Bernanke ~~While~~of ~~central~~the ~~bank~~Fed ~~statements~~reiterated ~~remained~~his ~~downbeat~~commitment to low interest rates, pressuring the U.S. dollar and erasing previous gains. The Fund’s bond exposure experienced losses during a turbulent March as U.S. and European bonds sold off precipitously only to rebound later in the month. JGB came under pressure as the ~~bold~~BOJ ~~action~~resisted incalls ~~Europe~~to inincrease ~~dealing~~asset ~~with~~purchases beyond the ~~debt~~30 ~~crisis~~trillion ~~inspired~~yen ~~optimism~~committed at their February meeting. ~~Crude~~The ~~oil~~Fund ~~and~~experienced negative ~~base~~results ~~metals~~in ~~also~~the ~~rallied~~global ~~as September’s~~equity ~~losses~~markets ~~appeared~~in toMarch. ~~have~~European ~~attracted~~stocks ~~renewed~~fell ~~physical~~sharply ~~demand~~on euro-zone GDP contraction (-0.3%) ~~Gold~~before optimistic U.S. data helped lift futures ~~recovered~~to ~~from~~8-month ~~recent~~highs. ~~slides~~The Nikkei (+1.5%) managed to gain as ~~weakening~~the BOJ continued to ease in an effort to boost growth and weaken the

1511

~~the U~~yen.S. ~~dollar~~The ~~and~~Fund’s ~~prospects~~grains ~~for~~positions ~~easy~~experienced ~~money~~moderate inlosses ~~the U.S. and Europe~~ for the ~~foreseeable future supported values~~month. ~~Currencies~~Directionless ~~reversed~~trading asled ~~yield-seeking~~to ~~investors~~losses ~~redeployed~~in ~~capital~~corn ~~after the euro-zone averted disaster, Japanese authorities intervened,~~ and ~~commodity~~wheat ~~currencies~~while ~~rose.~~trending ~~Agricultural~~soybeans ~~products~~benefited ~~finished~~long ~~mixed~~soybean ~~as a weaker U~~meal positions.S. ~~dollar was offset by higher production.~~ The Fund’s ~~short-term~~exposure ~~strategies were unable~~ to ~~keep pace with~~ the ~~velocity~~metals ofsectors ~~the~~generated ~~change~~moderate inlosses ~~direction~~ as ~~losses~~precious ~~in bonds, currencies, energies and stocks offset gains in~~ metals ~~trading.~~declined ~~The~~on ~~Fund~~increasingly ~~experienced~~positive ~~significant~~sentiment ~~losses~~surrounding ~~in bonds markets in October. Losses in bond markets arose as optimism over~~ the ~~economic~~ ~~outlook~~stability ~~strengthened~~of as the ~~month~~global ~~progressed~~economy. ~~U.S. bond and German bund yields rallied from their lows even as consumer confidence remained depressed as European policy makers tackled their sovereign debt issue in a comprehensive manner.~~ The Fund’s allocation to ~~currencies~~money ~~produced~~market ~~losses~~futures also inproduced ~~October~~negative ~~as the risk on/risk off dynamic that has prevailed in 2011 continued with a dramatic return to risk~~results. ~~September’s~~Short-rate ~~U.S.~~price ~~dollar~~movement ~~liquidity~~closely ~~operations~~mirrored ~~and substantial progress between European sovereigns, banks and bond holders on a way forward out of~~ the ~~debt~~volatility ~~crisis~~seen ~~combined~~in ~~to send the euro 3.7% higher. The late~~longer-~~month~~term ~~debt~~maturities ~~agreement~~as ~~prompted~~central abanks ~~temporary~~continued ~~return~~ to ~~risk,~~hold ~~sending~~overnight ~~capital~~lending ~~flowing~~rates ~~back~~between ~~into~~0 ~~European regions such as Norway, Russia, Sweden~~ and ~~Poland.~~25 ~~Commodity~~basis ~~currencies also benefitted as macroeconomic risks receded with strong U~~points.S. ~~corporate~~Although ~~earnings~~targeted ~~and~~rates aare ~~2.5% rise in third quarter U.S. GDP. The Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and Brazilian real~~expected ~~moved~~to ~~sharply~~remain ~~higher~~near inzero ~~yet another extreme move. The Japanese government intervened~~ for ~~the~~an ~~fourth~~extended ~~time in just over a year~~period, ~~sending~~ the ~~yen~~strength ~~to intra-day declines~~ of ~~4.7%~~the ~~after~~equity ~~reaching~~rally ~~post-war~~precipitated ~~highs~~a ~~against~~decline ~~the dollar earlier~~ in ~~the month. Allocations to stock and~~ global ~~energy~~short-rate ~~markets~~prices, ~~also~~negatively ~~yielded~~impacting ~~negative~~the ~~returns in October. The~~ Fund’s ~~strategies~~long ~~in global equity markets suffered as markets reversed higher in volatile trade~~positions. U.S. equities led the way with the S&P 500 rising 11% for the month. Although consumer confidence and employment figures remained weak, investors gained confidence on impressive corporate earnings and U.S. GDP growth. In Europe, concerns over sovereign debt issues abated as the late-month summit finally yielded some tangible solutions to the crisis. The Fund’s ~~allocations~~short-term tostrategies ~~global~~produced ~~energy~~mixed ~~markets~~to ~~underperformed as encouraging economic news out of the U.S. and increasing optimism from European policy makers caused a sharp reversal from~~slightly ~~September’s~~negative ~~liquidation~~results. The Fund’s ~~dollar~~perpetual ~~for dollar~~ long gold position ~~recovered~~underperformed ~~this month (+6.4%) from September’s steep losses as equity and commodity market liquidation reversed, temporarily limiting the need for gold sales to finance losses~~ in ~~other~~March ~~assets. Acute U.S. dollar weakness (-3.4%) also provided support~~ as ~~European~~investors ~~policy~~exited ~~makers demonstrated~~ the ~~political~~precious ~~will~~metal to tackle their structural issues, agreeing to bank recapitalizations, an expansion of the European Financial Stability Facility, and a 50% haircut for Greek bond holders. On October 31, 2011, MF Global reported to the SEC and the CFTC possible deficiencies in ~~customer~~exchange segregated accounts held at the firm. As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation proceeding led by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and SIPC initiated the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act. On November 21, 2011, the SIPC liquidation Trustee announced that the shortfall in the customer segregated funds account could be as much as 22% or more. After consideration of the Fund’s exposure, the General Partner caused the Fund to take a reserve to account for ~~the Fund’s estimated exposure to such 22% shortfall as of October 31, 2011~~risk. ~~The reserve taken reduced the net asset value of Series A-1 and A-2 by approximately 0.49% and Series B-1 and B-2 by approximately 0.87%.~~

~~For~~In February, the ~~fourth~~Fund’s ~~quarter~~trading ofstrategies ~~2011~~generated positive returns as geopolitical and economic forces pushed energies and equities decidedly higher. Intensifying tensions with Iran over their nuclear program injected risk premium into oil markets, driving crude prices to multi-month highs. Meanwhile, a wave of hopeful economic data and the ~~most~~long-awaited ~~profitable~~second ~~market~~Greek bailout ~~group~~lifted ~~overall~~stocks. ~~was~~The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector produced significant returns in February as economic optimism, escalating Iranian tensions, and reduced refinery capacity led to robust returns for long energy positions. The Fund experienced positive results in global equity markets as stocks rose on continued economic improvement. While Europe worked its way towards the second bailout of Greece, equity markets across the continent were higher as fears of an imminent euro-zone collapse subsided. Investor optimism drove up markets across Asia, while the ~~greatest~~U.S. markets rose as unemployment fell to 8.3%, jobless claims hit a four-year low, and modest growth was seen in manufacturing and housing. The Fund’s allocation to currencies generated moderate losses ~~were~~due ~~attributable~~to the sharp reversal in the Japanese yen. The Fund’s bond portfolio produced negative results in February. U.S. bond prices retreated slightly from January highs as positive economic data continued to ~~positions~~foster the strongest equity rally in two decades. The Fund’s strategies underperformed in the ~~bonds~~metals sector after bullish trends in precious metals radically corrected as Fed Chairman Bernanke quelled hopes for QE3. Short-term strategies enhanced overall performance with gains in currencies, stocks, metals, and energies. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position erased the gains achieved by the managed futures strategy as gold suffered late-month losses following testimony from Mr. Bernanke that expressed optimism over improving macroeconomic data, reducing the likelihood of additional monetary stimulus.

In January, the Fund ’s strategies produced mixed results ~~for~~as ~~3rd~~optimism ~~Quarter~~toward a European debt resolution and positive economic growth indicators led investors to add risk. The Fund’s allocation to money market futures yielded robust returns as central banks universally maintained accommodative monetary policies. The Fund’s allocation to currency markets yielded negative returns as the U.S. dollar reversed its recent uptrend as global economic concerns began to subside. What had been a flight to safety in the U.S. dollar in late 2011: reversed as investors chose risk exposure and yield over conservation. The Fund’s grain positions experienced moderate losses for the month. Lingering concerns over South American corn and soybean yields drove grains to multi-week highs before surprisingly bearish USDA figures abruptly reversed trends. The highly anticipated January USDA report caused significant declines mid-month on unexpected increases in corn production and inventories, resulting in losses for the Fund’s corn positions. The Fund’s exposure to the energy sector generated positive returns, led by long gasoline and short natural gas positions. The Fund’s short-term strategies contributed positively to performance with gains in bonds, stocks, and metals. The Fund’s perpetual long gold position produced sizable gains after the FOMC announced that interest rates would remain low through 2014, sparking U.S. dollar worries. The ongoing EU debt crisis also continues to keep the euro weak. The instability associated with these currencies provided strong support for safe-haven assets.

InFor ~~September,~~ the ~~Fund’s~~first ~~trading~~quarter ~~strategies posted disappointing results as economic uncertainty spiked, precipitating a severe bout~~ of commodity market liquidation and corresponding flight to the U.S. dollar and treasuries. Equities came under pressure early as poor U.S. unemployment data and growing dysfunction in European money markets prompted liquidation. Values remained under duress for the balance of the month as the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”)2012, the ~~Fed~~most ~~and~~profitable the ECB offered bearish assessments of downside risks to global growth. The U.S. dollar gained along with U.S. and European treasuries as investors flocked to safe haven assets while awaiting further clarity from European authorities. Gold and silver reversed August’s gains on a stronger U.S. dollar, increased margin requirements and collateral damage from commodity and equity market ~~liquidation.~~group ~~Grains~~overall ~~and~~was ~~soft commodities were hit particularly hard amid~~ the ~~fundamental~~energy ~~reassessment~~sector ofwhile ~~demand, a stronger U.S. dollar and improved production prospects. The Fund’s short-term strategies further detracted from overall~~the ~~performance~~greatest as losses ~~in currencies and energies offset gains in bonds, metals and stocks. The Fund experienced significant losses in grains and agricultural markets in September. Losses~~ were ~~seen~~attributable into ~~grain~~positions ~~market trades amid global economic concerns, weakening demand, seasonal harvest pressure and a strong U.S. dollar. Positions~~ in ~~agricultural products underperformed as~~ the combination of excellent production and the increasing likelihood of a global recession resulted in heavy liquidation. Allocations to currencies and money markets also yielded negative returns in September. Losses in currency ~~markets resulted from a massive flight out of risk assets, including commodities, commodity currencies and emerging market equities which propelled the U~~sector.S. dollar sharply higher against a global basket of currencies. Positions in global money markets lost ground in September as continued instability in financial markets led to choppy action at the top of the recent range. Pressure continued to mount on European officials as major bank shares fell amid reports of rising dysfunction in the inter-bank lending market. This prompted the major central banks to coordinate funding and stability to the system. The Fund’s models produced gains in metals and bonds in September. Metals markets saw positive results overall as the seemingly intractable European debt crisis escalated pessimism regarding industrial metal demand. The Fund’s bond portfolio continued to perform well during September as fear and central bank intervention drove major sovereign debt prices higher. As world commodity and equity prices fell, investors invested into the safe haven assets of medium and long-term sovereign debt. The Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold position produced losses in September. December COMEX gold opened the month with new all-time

16Off-Balance Sheet Risk

~~Table~~The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in a future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures and forward contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of ~~Contents~~off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures positions of the Fund at the same time, and if Superfund Capital Management was unable to offset such positions, the Fund could experience substantial losses. Superfund Capital Management attempts to minimize market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio in all but extreme instances not greater than 50%.

In ~~highs~~addition ~~before~~to ~~reversing~~market torisk, ~~post~~in entering into futures and forward contracts, there is a ~~loss~~credit ofrisk 11that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Fund.5% The counterparty for futures contracts traded in ~~volatile~~the ~~action~~U.S. ~~Losses~~and ~~accelerated~~on ~~after~~most ~~the~~foreign exchanges ~~Fed’s~~is ~~plan~~the toclearinghouse ~~purchase~~associated ~~long-term~~with ~~debt~~such ~~was~~exchange. ~~announced~~In general, ~~citing~~clearinghouses ~~increasing~~are ~~downside~~backed ~~risks~~by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to ~~economic~~ ~~growth.~~share Byany ~~minimizing~~financial ~~inflation~~burden ~~worries,~~resulting from the ~~Fed’s~~non-performance ~~action~~by ~~also~~one ~~paved~~of ~~the~~their members ~~way~~and, ~~for~~as asuch, ~~massive~~should ~~exodus~~significantly ~~out~~reduce ofthis ~~commodities~~credit risk. AsIn cases where the ~~flight~~clearinghouse ~~out~~is ofnot ~~risk~~backed ~~progressed~~by the clearing members, ~~gold~~like ~~lost~~some ~~ground~~foreign asexchanges, ~~institutions~~it ~~used~~is ~~recent~~normally ~~profits~~backed toby ~~finance~~a ~~losses elsewhere.~~consortium of banks or other financial institutions.

In August, the Fund’s trading strategies yielded mixed results as volatility continued to rise in conjunction with political and economic uncertainty. Global contagion fears escalated to new levels during the month following the downgrade of U.S. debt and heightened fears of a downgrade of French debt. The Fund’s trend following models produced gains in bonds and money markets as safe haven capital flooded to sovereign debt. The Fund’s short-term strategies also contributed positively to overall performance as gains in bonds, metals and energies offset losses in stocks and currencies. The Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold position furthered gains as gold futures increased over 12% while posting new all-time highs above $1,900 per ounce. The Fund’s allocation to bond markets outperformed once again in August as the fear trade picked up momentum amid flagging consumer sentiment as governments continued to fail to address long-term deficit challenges. U.S. bonds increased over 7% as safe haven demand surged with the S&P downgrade of U.S. debt and subsequent heavy liquidation in global equity markets. The trading strategies also produced gains from short-term interest rate futures positions in August as the uptrend remained firmly entrenched. Short-term rate futures around the world spiked higher early in the month as equities sold off in response to uncertainty surrounding the debt of both sovereigns as well as major financial institutions. Somewhat paradoxically this led to a flight to safety to some of the very sovereigns that were coming under fire, most notably the U.S. Allocations to equities markets yielded negative results in August as global markets collapsed under the weight of fears surrounding the stability of major international banks. Equity market volatility increased as S&P’s downgrade of U.S. debt was followed by fears of a French downgrade due to exposure to Italy. Global growth expectations contracted quickly sending Italian (-15.7%), Spanish (-8.9%) and French (-11.4%) indices sharply lower, prompting regulators to establish short-selling bans. Short sellers responded by attacking Europe’s leading economy, sending Germany’s DAX to a loss of 19.4%. Asian markets also suffered amid global contagion fears, as Japan (-9%), Korea (-13%) and Singapore (-9.7%) witnessed declines. Late month news that Warren Buffet was investing $5 billion in embattled Bank of America shares along with a surprisingly strong U.S. durable goods number and a Greek bank merger restored some measure of confidence while limiting losses in the Dow to 4.1%. The Fund’s currencies positions also yielded negative returns in August as the euro and U.S. dollar settled into tight ranges while risk currencies reversed lower. Other market sectors, relative to those discussed above, did not have a substantial influence on the Fund’s overall positive performance in the month of August.

~~For~~Off-Balance ~~the~~Sheet ~~third~~Arrangements ~~quarter of 2011, the most profitable market group overall was the bonds sector, while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the currencies sector.~~

The Fund ~~results~~does ~~for~~not ~~2nd~~engage ~~Quarter~~in ~~2011:~~off-balance sheet arrangements with other entities.

InContractual ~~June,~~Obligations the Fund’s trading strategies yielded negative results as the correction in stocks and commodities that began in May continued, only to reverse late in the month. The Fund’s short-term strategies contributed positively to overall performance as gains in bonds, metals and stocks offset losses in currencies and energies. The Fund underperformed in equities futures trading in June as stagnating growth and European sovereign debt worries sent indices sharply lower. European equities plummeted as EU officials, private creditors and the Greek government struggled to find a workable solution to the crisis. Meanwhile, the Fund’s bond strategies

17The Fund does not enter into contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments of a type that would be typical for an operating company. The Fund’s sole business is trading futures, currency, forward and certain swap contracts, both long (contracts to buy) and short (contracts to sell). All such contracts are settled by offset, not delivery. Substantially all such contracts are for settlement within four months of the trade date and substantially all such contracts are held by the Fund for less than four months before being offset or rolled over into new contracts with similar maturities. The financial statements of Series A and Series B each present a Condensed Schedule of Investments setting forth net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of such Series’ open forward contracts as well as the fair value of the futures contracts purchased and sold by each Series at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

~~Table~~Critical Accounting Policies – Valuation of ~~Contents~~the Fund’s Positions

~~outperformed~~Superfund ~~across~~Capital ~~the~~Management ~~board~~believes inthat ~~June, responding in a classic inverse manner to~~ the ~~factors~~accounting ~~impacting~~policies ~~equities.~~that ~~German~~are ~~bunds~~most ~~moved~~critical steadily higher early as uncertainty over the status of Greek debt intensified. Lower than expected German factory orders and industrial production supported values as well. Australian bonds rallied, due in part to the ~~attractive yield differential versus the U.S., Europe and Japan. The~~ Fund’s ~~allocation to~~financial ~~global~~condition ~~energy markets produced losses as the recent correction continued in June, reflecting increasing pessimism for economic prospects. Energy markets~~ and ~~commodity~~results ~~currencies sold off while treasuries gained on safe haven flows as softening~~of ~~manufacturing~~operations ~~data~~relate ~~prompted~~to the ~~ECB~~valuation ~~and~~of the Fed to lower their longer term inflation estimates. However, with a late month agreement on a new aid package, equities and other risk assets reversed higher, while treasuries gave back earlier gains. Late month losses in previous metals and choppy action in base metals led to negative performance in that sector. The Fund’s ~~trading models also produced losses in grains in June as improving weather and declining demand prospects associated with macroeconomic concerns led to sharp reversals~~positions. ~~Gold~~The ~~and~~majority ~~silver~~of ~~finished lower on~~ the ~~inflation outlook while grains sold off as excellent weather and an uncertain demand outlook led to higher inventory estimates. The~~ Fund’s ~~dollar~~positions ~~for~~are ~~dollar long~~exchange-traded ~~gold~~ futures ~~position~~contracts, ~~yielded~~which ~~subpar~~are ~~results~~valued indaily ~~June~~at assettlement ~~choppy~~prices topublished ~~slightly~~by ~~lower~~the ~~action eroded returns~~exchanges. ~~Europe’s~~Any ~~sovereign~~forward ~~debt~~foreign ~~situation~~currency contracts ~~dominated~~held ~~much~~by of the ~~headlines~~Fund asare ~~Greek,~~valued ~~German~~at ~~and~~published ~~French~~daily ~~officials~~settlement ~~struggled~~prices toor ~~come~~at todealers’ ~~common ground on new financing for the heavily indebted nation~~quotes. ~~Indeed~~Thus, ~~gold~~Superfund inCapital ~~euro~~Management ~~terms~~expects ~~established~~that ~~new~~under ~~all-time~~normal ~~highs~~circumstances ~~just~~substantially ~~below~~all ~~€1,100 per~~of ~~ounce~~the onFund’s ~~June 22nd~~assets ~~before~~are ~~settling~~valued ~~2.1%~~on ~~lower~~a ~~near~~daily ~~the €1,046 per ounce level with the~~basis ~~passage~~using ofobjective ~~Greek austerity~~ measures ~~and dovish longer term inflation statements by the ECB and the Fed~~.

InRecently ~~May,~~Issued ~~the Fund’s~~Accounting ~~medium~~Pronouncements to long term trading strategies underperformed as investors temporarily abandoned risk assets in favor of safe haven alternatives. The Fund’s short-term strategies also contributed negatively to overall performance as losses in equities, metals and currencies offset gains in bonds and energies. Equities reversed as declines in U.S. employment, housing and GDP combined with disappointing German factory orders to unnerve bullish investors. The Fund’s allocation to global stock indices underperformed despite a late recovery as the European debt crisis and a slowdown in manufacturing heightened fears of stagnant growth. The Fund’s bond strategies produced positive results across the board in May as safe haven assets pressed higher amid uncertainty concerning the sustainability of global economic growth. Treasuries rallied as bond yields in peripheral European states soared amid growing concern that a Greek default or restructuring was a real possibility. Allocations to currencies yielded poor results for the Fund in May as the U.S. dollar and euro reversed April’s action following the ECB’s unexpected removal of the “strong vigilance” on higher prices language from their May policy statement. The growing focus on the European sovereign debt situation prompted a flight out of risk assets and into the U.S dollar and the Swiss franc, which established a new record high against the euro. Energies and base metals saw sharp declines as a bearish Goldman Sachs commodity call, along with heightened volatility in forex markets tied to the problems in Europe, spurred liquidation. The Fund’s performance in the metals sector reversed as gold futures opened the month retracing over 6% from all-time highs established on May 2nd. The weakness stemmed from massive liquidation in silver and receding inflation fears as European sovereign debt instability delayed near term prospects for an ECB rate hike. April gains turned into May losses for the Fund in energies as recent upward trends in crude oil, heating oil and gasoline gave way to significant declines. Grains endured more volatile action as extreme weather in the Northern Hemisphere continued to threaten production prospects. The Fund’s position in grains suffered due to continued volatility from broad based commodity selling, a reversal in the U.S. dollar and a surprise 8% upward revision in 2010-11 USDA corn ending stocks. The Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold futures position underperformed in May as heavy early month liquidation led to an eventual loss of 1.3% for the precious metal. The market opened the month with a decline of over 6% from May 2nd record highs amid rumors that George Soros and Carlos Slim were cutting precious metal bets. Values stabilized slightly below $1,500 per ounce before rallying to finish near $1,535 per ounce amid safe haven buying.

InASU ~~April, the Fund produced solid overall gains, rebounding from a subpar performance in March. Global equities continued to trend higher despite U.S and European debt issues, Mid~~2013-~~East~~08 unrest and the Japanese disaster. Manufacturing maintained its positive trajectory, with notable improvement in Germany driving the DAX over 6% higher while U.S. shares accelerated to new multi-year highs on strong corporate earnings. Bond markets reversed mid-month as a downgrade in the U.S. credit outlook temporarily shifted focus away from inflation and toward longer term obstacles to growth. Gold posted record highs above $1,500 per ounce and silver fell just short of the $50 per ounce mark, adding over 28% as the Fed’s reaffirmation of quantitative easing and a U.S. credit outlook downgrade sent the U.S. dollar plummeting. The Fund experienced uneven results in grains and agricultural markets amid volatile weather conditions. The Fund’s short-term strategies contributed positively to overall performance as gains in currencies, metals and stocks offset losses in bonds and energies. The Fund’s allocation to global stock indices performed well in April as the uptrend in equities continued. The Dow rose 4.4%, reaching mid-2008 highs on excellent quarterly earnings. Late-month results from Apple and IBM easily offset the downgrade of the U.S. credit outlook by S&P. European equities generally ignored sovereign debt worries, finishing broadly higher as surging Germany factory orders and industrial production set a positive tone. However, Greece’s ASE-20 moved back to its lows as debt restructuring rumors rattled investors. Asian indices tracked steadily higher, continuing to capitalize on China’s dynamic growth. Japan’s Nikkei (+1.3%) broke higher late as disaster recovery efforts progressed. The Fund yielded negative results in global bond markets in April as a mid-month reversal produced losses. German bunds continued their recent trend lower early in the month as strong economic data at home combined with sovereign debt fears on the periphery to drive yields higher. Ongoing inflation fears ahead of the ECB’s 25 basis point rate hike also exerted pressure. Values then recovered somewhat before vaulting higher in conjunction with the downgrade of the U.S. credit outlook by S&P as investors received a sobering reminder of the potential long-term risks to global growth prospects. The Fund experienced minor gains from its allocation to short-term interest rate futures in April in mixed action. Eurodollar futures trended higher as the Fed officially reiterated its commitment to completing the second round of quantitative easing (“QE2”) after some doubts were expressed last month. Euribor futures finished

18In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-08, Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”). ASU 2013-08 contains new guidance regarding the approach to investment company assessment, requires non-controlling ownership interests in other investment companies to be measured at fair value and requires additional disclosures about the investment company’s status as an investment company and information required to be provided to any of its investees. The amendments in the update are effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. Superfund Capital Management is evaluating the impact of ASU 2013-08 on the financial statements and disclosures.

~~Table~~ASU of2011-11 ~~Contents~~

~~mixed~~In asDecember ~~the~~2011, ~~ECB~~FASB ~~maintained~~issued ~~its~~ASU ~~vigilant~~No. 2011-11, ~~stance~~Disclosures onabout ~~inflation~~Offsetting byAssets ~~raising~~and ~~their~~Liabilities ~~discount~~(“ASU ~~rate 25 basis points as expected~~2011-11”). ~~Allocations to currency markets yielded strong results in April as recent~~ASU ~~trends~~2011-11 ~~extended~~requires ~~amid~~disclosures ~~accelerating U.S. dollar weakness. The euro surged~~ to ~~its~~make ~~highest~~financial ~~level~~statements ~~since~~that ~~December~~are ofprepared ~~2009~~under ~~as an S&P downgrade of the~~ U.S. ~~credit~~generally ~~outlook~~accepted ~~prompted~~accounting ~~severe~~principles ~~U.S~~(“GAAP”) ~~dollar~~more ~~weakness~~comparable asto ~~the~~those ~~month~~prepared ~~came~~under toInternational aFinancial ~~close.~~Reporting ~~The Australian~~Standards ~~dollar marched 6~~(“IFRS”).2% higher amid excellent export growth, while the New Zealand dollar rose by approximately the same percentage on a rising appetite for yield and risk as global investors sought to offset asset deterioration linked to inflation. The ~~Colombian~~ ~~peso~~new ~~added~~disclosure ~~another~~requirements ~~5.5%~~mandate ~~amid~~that ~~heavy~~entities ~~foreign~~disclose ~~direct~~both ~~investment~~gross ~~flows into the oil~~ and ~~mining~~net ~~industries.~~information ~~Sweden’s~~about ~~krona~~instruments and ~~Brazil’s~~transactions ~~real~~eligible ~~also~~for ~~gained~~offset ~~significantly as rate hikes attracted yield hungry investors. The Fund’s grain positions suffered losses~~ in ~~April amid heightened volatility as values fluctuated along with uncertain weather. Soybeans finished lower on~~ the ~~prospect~~statement of ~~U.S.~~assets ~~corn~~and ~~acres~~liabilities shifting to soybeans due to an excessively wet spring. A potentially record breaking South American crop led China to cancel U.S. purchases, while a bearish commodity call by Goldman Sachs pressured values as well. ~~Wheat sold off late, losing 7% of its value~~ as ~~forecasts~~instruments ~~for badly needed rains in winter wheat areas~~and ~~offset~~transactions ~~the~~subject ~~bullish effects of excessive moisture in spring wheat regions. Corn traded~~ to ~~all-time~~an ~~highs~~agreement ~~above~~similar ~~$7.80 per bushel as poor planting progress threatened~~ to exacerbate historically tight supplies. The Fund’s allocation to agricultural markets also resulted in losses for April as growing supplies offset the weaker U.S. dollar. June cattle (-6.2%) fell throughout the month after establishing record highs on April 4th as the USDA reported that commercial red-meat production reached a ~~record~~master ~~high.~~netting ~~June hogs also reversed to finish 8~~arrangement.4% ~~lower~~In after a reported 12% increase in frozen pork stocks versus last year. Cotton fell sharply on concern that China’s attempts to slow inflation using higher interest rates and reserve rate requirements would cut into demand. Meanwhileaddition, ~~July~~ASU ~~NY coffee established 14~~2011-~~year~~11 ~~highs~~requires ~~amid~~disclosure ~~poor~~of ~~weather~~collateral inreceived ~~South America. Allocations to metals outperformed in April as exceptional U.S. dollar weakness~~ and ~~rising~~posted inflation throughout the world propelled precious metals sharply higher. Gold saw an 8.1% gain, surpassing the $1,550 per ounce mark. July silver tacked on another 28%, pushing its year to date return to over 50% in ~~frenzied~~connection action. Copper futures lost 3.4% as the U.S. credit downgrade and another reserve requirement hike in China dampened the growth outlook for the world’s two largest copper consumers. The Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold position surged as gold futures rose to new all time highs in U.S. dollar terms. CPI readings in China, Europe and the U.S. continued to expand with ~~rising~~master ~~energy~~netting ~~markets,~~agreements ~~enhancing~~or ~~demand~~similar ~~for the perceived inflation hedge~~arrangements. The U.S. dollar struggled early amid rate hikes in Europe and China, along with a number of hikes in lesser economies. The S&P downgrade of the U.S. long term credit outlook accelerated these U.S. dollar losses.

~~For~~In January 2013, FASB issued guidance to clarify the ~~second~~scope ~~quarter~~of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The amendments clarify that the scope of guidance issued in December 2011 to enhance disclosures around financial instrument and derivative instruments that are either (a) offset, ~~the~~or ~~most~~(b) subject ~~profitable~~to ~~market~~a ~~group~~master ~~overall~~netting ~~was~~agreement ~~the~~or ~~bonds~~similar ~~sector~~agreement, ~~while~~irrespective ~~the~~of whether ~~greatest~~they ~~losses~~are ~~were~~offset, ~~attributable~~applies to ~~positions~~derivatives, inincluding ~~the~~bifurcated ~~energy~~embedded ~~sector~~derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Adoption did not have a material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.

~~Fund~~ASU ~~results for 1st Quarter~~ 2011:-04

In ~~March~~May 2011, ~~the~~FASB issued ~~Fund’s~~ASU ~~allocation to global equity markets underperformed as a sharp countertrend reversal following the disaster in Japan produced losses for the Fund’s strategies~~No. 2011-04, ~~Equity~~Amendments ~~markets opened~~to ~~the~~Achieve ~~month~~Common ~~moving~~Fair ~~sideways~~Value asMeasurement ~~the reemergence of sovereign debt~~ and ~~inflation~~Disclosure ~~worries~~Requirements in ~~Europe offset steady expansion in global manufacturing~~U.S. ~~From~~GAAP ~~there~~and ~~the Nikkei plunged 25~~IFRSs.0% onASU ~~panic~~2011-~~induced~~04 ~~selling~~includes ~~following~~common ~~the~~requirements ~~events of March 11th. Results~~ for ~~the~~measurement ~~Fund’s~~of ~~models~~and ~~experienced~~disclosure ~~losses~~about asfair ~~most~~value ~~leading~~between ~~indices participated in the selloff as risk appetite abated~~U. ~~Equities quickly recovered as the focus shifted to the growth to be generated by rebuilding Japan~~S. ~~Nikkei~~ ~~futures finished only 7.7% lower on the month while shares in South Korea~~ GAAP and ~~Hong Kong finished 9~~IFRS.1% ~~and~~ASU ~~0.9%~~2011-04 ~~higher,~~requires ~~respectively,~~reporting onentities ~~the belief that these markets are well positioned~~ to ~~fill~~disclose the ~~temporary~~following ~~void~~information ~~left~~for byfair ~~the~~value ~~decimated Japanese~~measurements ~~manufacturing~~categorized ~~sector.~~within ~~U.S.~~Level ~~equity~~3 ~~markets also experienced small gains as macroeconomic data continued on a positive trajectory. A mixture~~ of ~~long and short positions in equity markets led~~ the ~~Fund~~fair tovalue anhierarchy: ~~overall~~quantitative ~~loss.~~information ~~The~~about ~~Fund’s positions in~~ the ~~bond~~unobservable ~~sector~~inputs ~~experienced~~used ~~gains~~ in ~~March despite volatile market conditions as geopolitical instability in Libya and Japan and financial instability in Europe led investors to~~ the ~~relative~~fair ~~safety of treasuries. Positions in 10-year~~value ~~Japanese~~measurement, ~~Government~~the ~~Bonds~~valuation ~~experienced~~processes ~~gains~~used asby the ~~market~~reporting ~~opened~~entity ~~the~~and ~~month near unchanged before rallying sharply in response to~~ a ~~nearly~~narrative ~~20.0%~~description ~~washout~~of ~~in equities following~~ the ~~disaster.~~sensitivity ~~The Fund experienced losses in German bund futures as the market finished lower on news~~ of ~~improving employment, factory orders and retail sales. Meanwhile,~~ the ~~sovereign~~fair ~~debt~~value ~~situation~~measurement ~~continued~~ to ~~evolve~~changes ~~amid several debt downgrades of peripheral states, prompting investors to demand more yield to hold German debt even as EU leaders agreed to an expanded bailout package for troubled states. Results~~ in ~~U.S.~~unobservable ~~bonds~~inputs ~~also~~and ~~experienced~~the ~~losses~~interrelationships inbetween ~~turbulent~~those ~~trading~~unobservable ~~activity as strong economic prospects offset geopolitical safe haven buying~~inputs. ~~A mixture of~~In ~~long~~addition, ~~and~~ASU ~~short~~2011-04 ~~bond~~requires ~~positions~~reporting ~~led~~entities ~~the Fund~~ to anmake ~~overall~~disclosures ~~gain~~about onamounts ~~the~~and ~~month.~~reasons ~~The~~for ~~Fund’s~~all ~~currency~~transfers ~~positions experienced gains~~ in ~~March as interest rate expectations~~ and ~~unsettling~~out ~~geopolitical developments dominated trading activity. June euro futures advanced 2.9% despite debt downgrades~~ of ~~Greece,~~Level ~~Portugal~~1 and ~~Spain~~Level as2 ~~the~~fair ~~ECB~~value ~~chairman continued to express the need for extreme vigilance with respect to the growing threat of inflation~~measurements. The ~~Swiss~~new ~~franc benefitted as investors sought shelter from the U.S.’s quantitative easing~~ and ~~Europe’s~~revised ~~sovereign~~disclosures ~~debt~~are ~~troubles.~~effective ~~The yen rose over 4.0% following the catastrophic earthquake, amid expectations~~ for ainterim ~~massive~~and ~~repatriation of capital to rebuild the stricken nation.~~annual ~~However,~~reporting inperiods ~~the~~beginning ~~first~~after ~~coordinated G7 intervention since the 2000 support for the euro, central bankers crushed the rally on March~~December ~~18th~~15, ~~leading to a loss of 1~~2011.6% ~~on the month.~~ The ~~Mexican peso outperformed as the oil producing nation saw slowing inflation complimented by expectations for continuing strong GDP growth. A mixture of long and short currency positions led the~~ Fund toadopted anASU ~~overall~~2011-04 ~~gain on the month. June gold contracts finished a choppy month with a 2.0% gain~~ as ~~the trend~~ of ~~a shift from improving macroeconomic results to inflation risks continued. Daily reminders of rising food costs fuelled the inflation story and~~January 1, ~~according to the United Nations, food costs posted record highs in February after rising 25~~2012.0% ~~in 2010.~~The ~~Gold~~adoption ~~experienced a mid-month correction~~ of ~~4.4% following~~ the ~~catastrophe~~provisions ~~in Japan as investors moved out~~ of ~~risk~~ASU ~~assets.~~2011-04 ~~However,~~has ~~the~~not ~~market~~had ~~closed strong as ECB rate hike expectations pressured the U.S. dollar to~~ a ~~loss~~material ofimpact ~~1.5%~~ on the ~~month. These factors produced an overall gain for the~~ Fund’s ~~dollar~~financial ~~for~~statement ~~dollar long gold futures position~~disclosures.

1913

InItem ~~February, the Fund’s allocation to equity markets performed well as major indices in the U~~7A.S. ~~and~~Quantitative ~~Europe continued to press higher on improving economic conditions~~ and ~~strong~~Qualitative ~~corporate~~Disclosures ~~results.~~about ~~Late~~Market ~~in the month, European and U~~Risk.S. equities were shaken as the political unrest in Egypt spread to Libya and Bahrain, where protesters were met with force. The outbreak of violence triggered a spike in energy markets, which, when combined with uncertainty surrounding the severity of the crisis, prompted liquidation. Most major U.S. and European indices recovered late amid reassuring comments that the Saudis would cover any oil supply shortfalls. Asian shares struggled as inflation took a toll on growth prospects. Chinese H-shares lagged, finishing unchanged as inflation and consequent fiscal tightening dominated the action. Spillover pressure also affected shares in Singapore and Taiwan, which finished 5.9% and 5.6% lower, respectively. Japan’s Nikkei and Australia’s SPI finished 3.7% and 2.1% higher, respectively, in relatively quiet trading. A mixture of long and short positions in equity markets led the Fund to an overall gain in February. The Fund experienced losses in the bond sector in February as existing positions suffered amid a reversal in investors’ perception of the current risk environment. After breaking lower early in the month on strong corporate earnings and forward guidance, U.S. 30-year bond futures surged to January highs as growing unrest across the Middle East unnerved investors, prompting a general flight to safety. Germany’s bund futures opened the month under pressure as anecdotal evidence of exceptional demand from China offset disappointing December factory orders and retail sales data. However, the deteriorating geopolitical situation and local election losses by the majority ruling party in Germany spurred a reversal that led to losses for the Fund. Trade in Australian bond futures was particularly volatile, to the Fund’s detriment, as weakness associated with a strong early month employment report faded as the Reserve Bank of Australia chief indicated that the central bank was not considering a rate hike at the current time. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund obtained gains in currencies in February as the U.S. dollar continued to trend lower, extending January’s losses by another 0.7%. The Swiss franc and Japanese yen finished 1.5% and 0.3% higher, respectively, amid safe haven buying as the situation deteriorated in the Middle East. The Fund experienced gains in the British pound, which finished the month 1.5% higher, after CPI readings showed that prices were increasing at a 4.0% annualized rate, the highest level since fall of 2008. Meanwhile, central bankers in Peru, Colombia, Indonesia and Russia raised rates as they continued to battle inflation while also attempting to fend off the negative effects that massive currency inflows are having on domestic currency appreciation. Colombia extended its dollar purchase program for another three months, hoping to cap currency gains to protect its export prospects. The Australian dollar finished 2.5% higher against the U.S. dollar as strong commodity markets supported full employment. A mixture of long and short positions in the currency sector led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. The Fund’s allocation to global energy markets yielded gains as growing instability in the Middle East and Northern Africa sent prices significantly higher. Short positions in WTI crude oil performed well early in the month, falling over 5.0% following the Egyptian president’s resignation and total U.S. fuel supplies moving to twenty year highs at the Cushing, Oklahoma delivery point. From there, the Fund experienced gains on long positions in April gasoline, heating oil and brent crude, which finished 9.8%, 7.6% and 10.9% higher, respectively, at the expense of the Fund’s WTI crude position as civil unrest spread to Bahrain, Libya and Oman. The markets gathered momentum as speculation surrounding the stability of the Saudi regime intensified. Short positions in April natural gas also performed well, falling 8.9% on the month as forecasts for mild weather contributed to a convincing breach of the $4 btu level. A mixture of long and short positions in the energy sector led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. The Fund experienced gains in April gold contracts, which finished the month 5.6% higher as the market’s focus shifted from improving economic results to inflation risks. Gold rallied early as China responded aggressively to its inflation challenges with interest rate and reserve requirement hikes. While the unrest in Egypt subsided relatively peacefully, matters took a more violent turn in Bahrain and Libya as rising food costs exacerbated widespread discontent, fuelling skyrocketing energy markets which posed even greater inflation risks and support for gold. These factors produced an overall gain for the Fund’s dollar for dollar long gold futures position.

~~In January,~~Not ~~the Fund’s allocation to global equities finished mixed as disappointing performances in several peripheral markets offset steady trends in major indices~~required. In Europe, several past laggards, including Greece, Italy and Spain finished the month 13.9%, 9.2% and 10.2% higher, respectively, as heavy ECB participation in secondary market debt auctions and plans for a comprehensive debt relief structure reassured investors. Small gains on positions in Germany’s DAX, France’s CAC40 and the Amsterdam EOE Index, which finished 2.5%, 5.1% and 1.3% higher, respectively, offset losses in the sector as several core European economies improved. U.S. equities pressed higher as improving employment figures and solid consumer demand elevated corporate earnings. The Fund experienced early losses in Australia’s SPI as epic flooding cut into 2011 GDP prospects. Chinese H-Shares reversed lower late in the month to the Fund’s detriment as authorities continued to struggle with inflation. Overall, a mixture of long and short stock indices positions led the Fund to an overall loss. The Fund’s allocation to global bond markets underperformed in January as investors exited safe haven assets in response to improving global economic conditions. The Fund experienced losses in its Japanese government bond positions as large auctions and generally poor economic performance resulted in a ratings agency debt downgrade, encouraging investors to put money to work outside the country. In Europe, investors sold bund and bobl futures as Euro-zone industrial production readings easily surpassed expectations. Additionally, positive dialogue from various heads of state regarding a comprehensive crisis solution was backed up by aggressive ECB purchases of Italian, Portuguese and Spanish debt in secondary markets, ensuring successful auctions for the embattled countries. In the U.S., performance suffered in choppy countertrend action as bond and note futures moved sideways to slightly higher as QE2 persisted in spite of rising inflation concerns in the rest of the world. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund experienced losses in the interest rates sector as European short rates reversed sharply from December’s strong close. While the ECB left rates unchanged in January, their policy minutes emphasized vigilance over price stability in the midst of rising commodity prices. Policy makers also noted that uncertainty remains elevated and some financial institutions still face the threat of balance sheet adjustments despite positive underlying momentum in the economy. They also stressed the need for Euro members to reduce debt-to-GDP ratios. Short rate

20Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

~~Table~~Financial statements appear beginning on page 25 of ~~Contents~~this report. Supplementary data is not required.

~~futures~~Item in the U.S. finished near their highs as early weakness associated with a strong employment report was offset by staunchly accommodative Fed monetary policy. Their focus, in contrast to the ECB, continues to be focused on growth and full employment at the expense of inflation. Meanwhile, Australian short rate futures moved higher to the Fund’s benefit as epic flooding cut into 2011 GDP estimates, thereby reducing prospects for previously expected rate hikes. A mixture of long and short interest rate positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund’s allocation to currency markets underperformed in January as the euro and British pound finished 2.4% and 2.8% higher against the U.S. dollar, respectively, and euro-zone regionals reversed late 2010 losses. Early month news that Japan would buy distressed sovereign debt and strong ECB secondary market participation in Portugal, Spain and Italian bond auctions provided support to these economies. As confidence in the euro improved, investors moved out of the Swiss franc, which finished 0.9~~% lower against the U~~.S. ~~dollar,~~Changes ~~and back into risk plays~~ in ~~Hungary~~ and ~~Poland,~~Disagreements which finished 5.4% and 4.1% higher, respectively, resulting in losses for the Fund. The Australian dollar finished 2.1% lower against the U.S. dollar as flood damage triggered a one-time levy, which tempered 2011 growth estimates and rate hike expectations. The Fund experienced losses in the yen following a credit rating downgrade as Japan’s huge debt load and limited policy options unnerved investors. Gains in the Mexican peso, which finished 1.8% higher against the U.S. dollar offset some losses in the sector as the peso rallied on prospects for a sustained U.S. economic recovery. The Fund’s mixture of long and short currency positions led to an overall loss on the month. The Fund experienced losses in the metals sector in January as gold and silver futures traded sharply lower amid growing optimism that the global economic recovery is gaining momentum. April gold finished with aAccountants loss of 6.2% as strong early month U.S. employment figures and ebbing contagion fears in Europe limited investors’ appetite for the alternative asset. March silver finished the month 8.8% lower in correlated action. The Fund’s allocation to industrial metals also suffered. The Fund’s positions in March COMEX copper were stopped out after a 6.0% intra-month decline due to China raising its reserve requirement in response to elevated GDP and CPI reports. Fears that China would take more aggressive measures to limit growth led to losses in London aluminum, lead and zinc as several Chinese banks were forced to cease lending for the remainder of the month. A mixture of long and short metals positions led the Fund to an overall loss on ~~the~~Accounting ~~month. The Fund’s allocation to global energy markets produced positive returns in January as economic, logistical~~ and ~~geopolitical~~Financial ~~factors underpinned values~~Disclosure. Strong U.S. employment figures and a pipeline shutdown in Alaska supported the Fund’s New York crude oil positions early in the month. However, elevated Chinese GDP and CPI readings precipitated another reserve requirement hike while increasing expectations for additional measures to slow their economy. This scenario, along with a bearish U.S. inventory report, contributed to losses for the Fund amid an 8.0% drop from intra-month highs. Long positions in brent crude finished 6.6% higher, surpassing $100 per barrel following a reversal in European demand expectations, an accident in the North Sea which idled 200,000 barrels of production and heightening unrest in Egypt. Front-month heating oil surged as well, adding 7.4% as exceptionally cold weather gripped the northern hemisphere, providing excellent returns for the Fund. A mixture of long and short energy positions led the Fund to an overall gain on the month.

~~For the first quarter of 2011, the most profitable market group overall was the energy sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the stock indices sector~~None.

~~Off-Balance~~Item ~~Sheet~~9A. ~~Risk~~Controls and Procedures.

~~The~~Controls term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in a future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures and ~~forward~~Procedures contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures positions of the Fund at the same time, and if Superfund Capital Management was unable to offset such positions, the Fund could experience substantial losses. Superfund Capital Management attempts to minimize market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio in all but extreme instances not greater than 50%.

InSuperfund ~~addition~~Capital Management, tothe ~~market~~Fund’s ~~risk~~general partner, inwith ~~entering~~the ~~into~~participation ~~futures~~of Superfund Capital Management’s principal executive officer and ~~forward~~principal ~~contracts~~financial officer, ~~there~~has isevaluated athe ~~credit~~effectiveness ~~risk~~of ~~that~~the adesign ~~counterparty~~and ~~will~~operation ~~not~~of beits ~~able~~disclosure controls toand ~~meet~~procedures ~~its~~with ~~obligations~~respect to ~~the~~each ~~Fund.~~Series ~~The~~individually, ~~counterparty~~as ~~for~~well ~~futures contracts~~as ~~traded~~the inFund ~~the~~as ~~U.S.~~a ~~and~~whole, onas ~~most~~of ~~foreign~~the ~~exchanges~~end isof the ~~clearinghouse~~period ~~associated~~covered ~~with~~by ~~such~~this ~~exchange.~~annual Inreport, ~~general~~and, ~~clearinghouses~~based ~~are~~on ~~backed~~their byevaluation, ~~the~~have ~~corporate~~concluded ~~members~~that ofthese ~~the~~disclosure ~~clearinghouse~~controls ~~who~~and procedures are ~~required~~effective. toThere ~~share~~were ~~any~~no ~~financial~~changes ~~burden resulting~~in ~~from~~Superfund ~~the~~Capital ~~non-performance~~Management’s byinternal ~~one~~controls ofwith ~~their~~respect ~~members~~to ~~and~~each Series individually, as ~~such,~~well ~~should~~as ~~significantly~~the ~~reduce~~Fund ~~this~~as ~~credit~~a ~~risk.~~whole, Inor ~~cases~~in ~~where~~other ~~the~~factors ~~clearinghouse~~applicable isto ~~not~~each ~~backed~~Series byindividually, ~~the~~as ~~clearing~~well ~~members,~~as ~~like~~the ~~some~~Fund as ~~foreign~~a ~~exchanges~~whole, itthat iscould ~~normally~~materially ~~backed~~affect bythese ~~a consortium~~controls ofsubsequent ~~banks~~to orthe ~~other~~date ~~financial~~of ~~institutions~~their evaluation.

OnChanges ~~October 31, 2011, MF Global reported to the SEC and the CFTC possible deficiencies~~ in ~~customer~~Internal ~~segregated~~Control ~~accounts~~over ~~held at the firm. As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation proceeding led by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) would be the safest and most~~Financial ~~prudent~~Reporting course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and SIPC initiated the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act. Superfund Capital Management closely monitored MF Global in the weeks prior to October 31, 2011 and began reducing the Fund’s exposure to MF Global. In October, total trading positions and assets of the Fund held at MF Global were reduced and steps were initiated to transfer all remaining positions and assets from MF Global to other clearing brokers prior to the bankruptcy filing. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the SIPC liquidation Trustee announced that the shortfall in the customer segregated funds account could be as much as 22% or more. After consideration of the Fund’s exposure, Superfund Capital Management caused the Fund to take a reserve to account for the Fund’s estimated exposure to such 22% shortfall. Series A-1 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $74,000, Series A-2 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $19,000, Series B-1 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $58,000 and Series B-2 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $43,000.

21Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires Superfund Capital Management to evaluate annually the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting with respect to each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, as of the end of each fiscal year, and to include in all annual reports a management report assessing the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act. There were no changes in Superfund Capital Management’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter-ended December 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Superfund Capital Management’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~Table~~Management’s ofAnnual ~~Contents~~Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~Since the Fund’s initial reserve was taken, an active market developed for MF Global claims similar to the Fund’s. As a result,~~ Superfund Capital Management ~~received~~is ~~bids~~responsible ~~from~~for ~~third~~establishing ~~parties~~and ~~for~~maintaining ~~the~~adequate ~~purchase~~internal ofcontrol over the ~~Fund’s~~financial MFreporting ~~Global~~of ~~claims.~~each Series ~~Following this process~~individually, ~~Superfund~~as ~~Capital~~well ~~Management~~as ~~determined it was in~~ the ~~best interests of the~~ Fund toas ~~sell~~a ~~its~~whole. MFInternal ~~Global~~control ~~claims,~~over ~~and~~financial ~~the~~reporting ~~Fund~~is ~~closed~~defined ~~on the sale~~ in ~~the~~Rules ~~amount~~13a-15(f) ~~of $312,885 for Series A~~ and ~~$335,057~~15d-15(f) ~~for~~under ~~Series B on June 11, 2012. Although~~ the ~~sale~~Securities ~~did~~Exchange ~~not~~Act ~~close~~as ~~until~~a ~~June 11,~~process ~~2012,~~designed ~~Superfund Capital Management recognized the change in reserve prior to closing the Fund’s books effective May 31~~by, ~~2012.~~or ~~Because~~under the ~~sale~~supervision ~~price was slightly less than the carrying amount~~ of, ~~the~~a ~~Fund~~company’s principal ~~assets~~executive onand ~~deposit~~principal atfinancial MFofficers ~~Global~~and aseffected ~~reduced~~ by ~~the reserve~~a ~~taken~~company’s asboard of ~~October 31~~directors, ~~2011,~~management ~~each~~and ~~Series~~other ~~recognized~~personnel ~~an additional reduction in value as of May 31, 2012 due~~ to ~~the~~provide ~~sale.~~reasonable ~~Such~~assurance ~~change~~regarding ~~in reserve is presented as “Loss on MF Global” on~~ the ~~Statements~~reliability of ~~Operations.~~financial ~~On May 31,~~reporting ~~2012,~~and the ~~net~~preparation ~~asset value~~ of financial ~~the~~statements ~~Series~~for ~~A-1~~external ~~Units~~purposes ~~was~~in ~~reduced~~accordance bywith ~~approximately 0~~U.~~05% (or approximately $0~~S.86 ~~per Unit); the net asset value of the Series A-2 Units was reduced by approximately 0~~GAAP.~~05%~~ ~~(or~~Superfund ~~approximately~~Capital ~~$0.94~~Management’s ~~per~~internal ~~Unit); the~~control ~~net~~over ~~asset~~financial ~~value~~reporting ofincludes ~~the~~those ~~Series~~policies ~~B-1 Units was reduced by approximately 0.07% (or approximately $1.06 per Unit);~~ and ~~the~~procedures ~~net~~that: ~~asset value of the Series B-2 Units was reduced by approximately 0.07% (or approximately $1.12 per Unit). Following this sale, the Fund no longer has any exposure to MF Global.~~

~~Off-Balance~~• ~~Sheet~~pertain ~~Arrangements~~to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole;

~~The~~• ~~Fund~~provide ~~does~~reasonable ~~not~~assurance ~~engage~~that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of each Series’, as well as the Fund’s, financial statements in ~~off-balance~~accordance ~~sheet~~with ~~arrangements~~U.S. GAAP, and that the receipts and expenditures of each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, are being made only in accordance with ~~other~~authorizations ~~entities.~~of Superfund Capital Management’s management and directors; and

~~Contractual~~• ~~Obligations~~provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, that could have a material effect on the Series’ or the Fund’s financial statements.

~~The~~Because ~~Fund does not enter into contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments~~ of aits ~~type~~inherent ~~that would be typical for an operating company. The Fund’s sole business is trading futures~~limitations, ~~currency,~~internal ~~forward~~control ~~and~~over ~~certain~~financial ~~swap~~reporting ~~contracts,~~may ~~both~~not ~~long~~prevent ~~(contracts to buy) and~~or ~~short~~detect ~~(contracts to sell)~~misstatements. ~~All~~Projections ~~such~~of ~~contracts~~any ~~are~~evaluation ~~settled by offset, not delivery. Substantially all such contracts are for settlement within four months~~ of ~~the~~effectiveness ~~trade~~to ~~date~~future ~~and~~periods ~~substantially all such contracts~~ are ~~held~~subject byto the ~~Fund~~risk ~~for~~that ~~less~~controls ~~than~~may ~~four months~~become ~~before~~inadequate ~~being~~because ~~offset or rolled over into new contracts with similar maturities. The financial statements~~ of ~~Series A~~changes ~~and~~in ~~Series B~~conditions, ~~each~~or ~~present~~that athe ~~Condensed~~degree ~~Schedule~~ of ~~Investments~~compliance ~~setting~~with ~~forth net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of such Series’ open forward contracts as well as~~ the ~~fair~~policies ~~value~~or ofprocedures ~~the futures contracts purchased and sold by each Series at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011~~may deteriorate.

~~Critical~~The ~~Accounting~~management ~~Policies~~of –Superfund ~~Valuation~~Capital Management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting with respect to each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework in 1992. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, Superfund Capital Management’s ~~Positions~~internal control over financial reporting with respect to each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, is effective based on those criteria.

~~Superfund~~14 Capital Management believes that the accounting policies that are most critical to the Fund’s financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Fund’s positions. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury bills. Superfund Capital Management believes the cost of securities plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, approximates fair value. The majority of the Fund’s positions are exchange-traded futures contracts, which are valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges. Any forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund are valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes. Thus, Superfund Capital Management expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Fund’s assets are valued on a daily basis using objective measures.

~~ASU~~The ~~2011~~Rule 13a-1114(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer, Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Exhibit 31.01, Exhibit 31.02, Exhibit 32.01 and Exhibit 32.02 hereto, respectively, are applicable with respect to each Series individually, as well as to the Fund as a whole.

InItem ~~December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No~~9B. ~~2011-11,~~ ~~Disclosures~~Other ~~about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”)~~Information. ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of assets and liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. New disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Superfund Capital Management is evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-11 on the financial statements and disclosures.

InThere ~~January~~was ~~2013,~~no ~~the~~information ~~FASB~~required ~~issued guidance~~ to ~~clarify~~be ~~the~~disclosed ~~scope of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The amendments clarify that the scope of guidance issued~~ in ~~December 2011 to enhance disclosures around financial instrument and derivative instruments that are either (~~a~~) offset,~~ orreport ~~(b) subject~~on toForm a8-K ~~master~~during ~~netting~~the ~~agreement~~fourth orquarter ~~similar agreement, irrespective~~ of ~~whether they are offset, applies to derivatives, including~~ ~~bifurcated~~2013 ~~embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions~~ that ~~are~~was ~~either~~not ~~offset~~reported ~~or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning~~ on ~~or after January~~Form ~~1, 2013~~8-K. ~~Adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Funds’ financial statements.~~

22PART III

~~Table~~Item of10. ~~Contents~~Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

~~ASU~~Identification ~~2011-04~~of Directors and Executive Officers

InThe ~~May~~Fund ~~2011,~~has ~~FASB~~no ~~issued~~directors ~~ASU~~or ~~No. 2011-04~~executive ~~“Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U~~officers.S. ~~GAAP~~The ~~and~~Fund ~~IFRSs”.~~has ~~ASU~~no ~~2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U~~employees.S. ~~GAAP~~It ~~and~~is ~~IFRS.~~managed ~~ASU~~by ~~2011-04~~Superfund ~~will~~Capital ~~require~~Management ~~reporting~~in ~~entities~~its tocapacity ~~disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:~~as ~~quantitative~~general ~~information~~partner. ~~about~~Superfund ~~the~~Capital ~~unobservable~~Management ~~inputs~~has ~~used~~been inregistered ~~the~~with ~~fair value measurement,~~ the ~~valuation~~CFTC ~~processes~~as ~~used by the reporting entity and~~ a ~~narrative~~commodity ~~description~~pool ofoperator ~~the~~since ~~sensitivity~~May 2001. ofIts ~~the~~main ~~fair~~business ~~value~~address ~~measurement~~is toSuperfund ~~changes~~Office inBuilding, ~~unobservable inputs~~P.O. ~~and~~Box ~~the~~1479, ~~interrelationships~~Grand ~~between~~Anse, ~~those unobservable inputs~~St. InGeorge’s, ~~addition~~Grenada, ~~ASU~~West Indies, ~~2011~~(473) 439-042418. ~~will~~Superfund ~~require~~Capital ~~reporting~~Management’s ~~entities~~directors ~~to make disclosures about amounts~~ and ~~reasons~~executive ~~for~~officers ~~all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures~~ are ~~effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Fund adopted ASU 2011-04~~ as offollows: ~~January 1, 2012. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Fund’s financial statement disclosures.~~

~~Item~~NIGEL 7AJAMES, age 33, was appointed as President of Superfund Capital Management on July 13, 2006, and was listed as a principal and registered as an associated person with Superfund Capital Management on November 28, 2006 and May 23, 2007, respectively. ~~Quantitative~~Mr. James has been an employee of various members of the Superfund group of affiliated companies since July 2003 when he became a software developer for Superfund Trading Management, Inc., an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management that acts as a commodity trading advisor to non-U.S. funds. In May 2005, he was promoted to the role of Intellectual Technology Project Manager for Superfund Trading Management, Inc. where he managed a team focused on conceptual analysis and ~~Qualitative~~design ~~Disclosures~~of ~~about~~trading ~~Market~~software. ~~Risk~~Mr. James graduated from the University of the West Indies in Barbados with a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science and Management in May 2003 and began his employment in July 2003. Mr. James is a citizen of Grenada.

~~Not~~MARTIN ~~required~~SCHNEIDER, age 47, was appointed Vice President, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and sole Director of Superfund Capital Management on July 28, 2010. Mr. Schneider was listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management on August 19, 2010. From May 1997 to June 2001, Mr. Schneider served as Sales Director for Nike, Inc., an international retailer, in the company’s European divisions. From July 2001 to July 2002, Mr. Schneider held the position of Commercial Director for FC Tirol Innsbruck, a former Austrian football club. In this position, Mr. Schneider was responsible for the promotional activities of the organization. Mr. Schneider spent August 2002 preparing for his transition to the Superfund group of financial companies. From September 2002 to March 2005, Mr. Schneider functioned as the sports marketing director for Quadriga Asset Management GmbH, a financial services company, and as the Executive Vice President of the successor company, Superfund Marketing and Sports Sponsoring Inc., a marketing services company. In April 2005, Mr. Schneider assumed the role of Operating Manager for Superfund Group Monaco, a financial services company, a position he held until his appointment to Superfund Capital Management in June 2010. In the position of Operating Manager, Mr. Schneider conducted internal operational and financial audits of members of the Superfund group of affiliated financial companies. Mr. Schneider is a graduate of TGM Technical School in Vienna, Austria, with a degree in mechanical engineering. Mr. Schneider is a citizen of Austria.

~~Item~~GIZELA BENEDEK, 8age 35, was appointed Treasurer of Superfund Capital Management on July 28, 2010. Ms. Benedek also serves as Audit Committee Financial ~~Statements~~Expert for the Fund. Ms. Benedek was listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management on September 10, 2010. From June 2000 to September 2005, Ms. Benedek served as an Associate of PricewaterhouseCoopers, an international accounting firm, in its tax consulting group in Vienna, Austria. In this position, Ms. Benedek provided tax consulting services to investment companies. From October 2005 to December 2005, Ms. Benedek conducted intensive research in connection with her master thesis. From January 2006 to July 2008, Ms. Benedek held the position of Auditing Associate in the auditing group of RSM Exacta Wirtschaftsprufung AG, an Austrian auditing and ~~Supplementary~~tax ~~Data~~consultancy firm. In this position, Ms. Benedek provided auditing services to private foundations and middle-market companies. From August 2008 through August 2009, she was granted educational leave sponsored by the Austrian government to study for the U.S. CPA exam. Since September 2009, Ms. Benedek has held the role of Financial Counsel for Superfund Distribution and Investment, Inc., a financial services company located in Grenada, West Indies. In this role, Ms. Benedek engages in various internal accounting and auditing functions. Ms. Benedek is a graduate of The University of Economics and Business Administration in Vienna, Austria, and is a certified public accountant. Ms. Benedek is a citizen of Austria.

~~Financial~~15 ~~statements appear beginning on page 31 of this report. Supplementary data is not required.~~

~~None~~CHRISTIAN BAHA, age 45, is Superfund Capital Management’s founder and ultimate sole owner. By December 1991, Mr. Baha began working independently to develop software for the technical analysis of financial data in Austria. In January 1995, Mr. Baha founded the first members of the Superfund group of affiliated companies specializing in managed futures funds and began to develop a worldwide distribution network. With profit sharing rights certificates, Mr. Baha launched an alternative investment vehicle for private investors. Launched on March 8, 1996, this product is called the Superfund Unternehmens-Beteiligungs-Aktiengesellschaft (Superfund Q-AG), and was formerly known as Quadriga Beteiligungs & Vermögens AG (Quadriga AG). In March 2003, a new generation of managed futures funds was internationally launched under the brand name “Superfund” and previously existing products have since been re-branded under this name. Simultaneously with the development of the Quadriga/Superfund group of affiliated companies, Mr. Baha founded the software company TeleTrader AG, which has been listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange since March 2001. He was listed as a principal of Superfund Advisors, Inc., a CFTC registered commodity pool operator, on November 20, 2009, however, such listing was withdrawn as of November 26, 2011. He was registered as an associated person and listed as a principal of Superfund Asset Management, Inc., a CFTC registered introducing broker, effective as of July 23, 1999 and June 24, 1997, respectively, until it withdrew its registration on July 12, 2012. He was registered as an associated person and listed as a principal of Superfund Asset Management LLC, a CFTC registered introducing broker, positions which he has held since June 11, 2012 and April 26, 2012. He has also been listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management from May 9, 2001 until it withdrew its registration on September 19, 2013. He was registered as an associated person of Superfund Capital Management on May 9, 2001 as well, however, such registration was subsequently withdrawn on February 17, 2009. Mr. Baha is listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management because he indirectly, through holding companies, owns 100% its equity securities. Mr. Baha was also listed as a principal of Superfund USA, Inc., a former broker dealer that was previously registered as a commodity pool operator with the CFTC from August 14, 2009 through September 4, 2010, from August 13, 2009 through September 4, 2010 because he is the sole owner of the foregoing entity. He is a graduate of the police academy in Vienna, Austria and studied at the Business University of Vienna, Austria. Mr. Baha is a citizen of Austria.

~~Item~~Identification ~~9A.~~of ~~Controls~~Certain ~~and~~Significant ~~Procedures.~~Employees

~~Controls~~None. ~~and Procedures~~

~~Superfund~~Family ~~Capital~~Relationships Management, the Fund’s general partner, with the participation of Superfund Capital Management’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures with respect to each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, and, based on their evaluation, have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in Superfund Capital Management’s internal controls with respect to each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, or in other factors applicable to each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, that could materially affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

~~Changes~~None. ~~in Internal Control over Financial Reporting~~

~~Section 404~~Business ofExperience the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires Superfund Capital Management to evaluate annually the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, and to include in all annual reports a management report assessing the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act. There were no changes in Superfund Capital Management’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter-ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Superfund Capital Management’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~Management’s~~See ~~Annual Report~~“Identification onof ~~Internal~~Directors ~~Control~~and ~~over~~Executive ~~Financial~~Officers,” ~~Reporting~~above.

~~Superfund~~Involvement Capital Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the financial reporting of each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in ~~Rules~~Certain ~~13a-15(f)~~Legal ~~and~~Proceedings 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by a company’s board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Superfund Capital Management’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

•There ~~pertain~~has tonever ~~the~~been ~~maintenance~~a ofmaterial ~~records that~~administrative, incivil ~~reasonable~~or ~~detail~~criminal order, ~~accurately~~judgment, ~~and~~decree ~~fairly~~or ~~reflect~~finding ~~the~~against ~~transactions~~Superfund ~~and~~Capital ~~dispositions~~Management ofor any ~~the assets~~ of ~~each~~its ~~Series individually~~directors, asexecutive ~~well~~officers, aspromoters ~~the~~or ~~Fund~~control aspersons. ~~a whole;~~

•Code ~~provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation~~ of ~~each~~Ethics Series’, as well as the Fund’s, financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that the receipts and expenditures of each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Superfund Capital Management’s management and directors; and

23The Fund has no employees, officers or directors and is managed by Superfund Capital Management. Superfund Capital Management has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and its principal accounting officer. A copy of the code of ethics may be obtained at no charge by written request to the corporate secretary of Superfund Capital Management, Superfund Office Building, P.O. Box 1479, Grand Anse, St. George’s, Grenada, West Indies.

~~Table~~Board of ~~Contents~~Director Nominees

•Not provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, that could have a material effect on the Series’ or the Fund’s financial statementsapplicable.

~~Because~~Audit ofCommittee ~~its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the~~Financial ~~risk~~Expert ~~that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.~~

The ~~management~~Board of Directors of Superfund Capital Management, ~~assessed~~in ~~the effectiveness of~~ its ~~internal~~capacity ~~control over financial reporting with respect to each Series individually,~~ as ~~well as~~ the ~~Fund~~audit ascommittee afor ~~whole, as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used~~ the ~~criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment~~Fund, ~~management~~ has ~~concluded~~ determined that, asGizela ofBenedek ~~December 31,~~qualifies ~~2012,~~as ~~Superfund~~an ~~Capital~~“audit ~~Management’s~~committee ~~internal~~financial ~~control~~expert” ~~over~~in ~~financial~~accordance ~~reporting~~ with ~~respect~~the toapplicable ~~each~~rules ~~Series~~and ~~individually,~~regulations asfor ~~well as~~ the ~~Fund~~SEC. asShe ~~a whole,~~ is ~~effective~~not ~~based~~independent onof ~~those criteria~~management.

~~The~~Item ~~Rule~~11. ~~13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal~~ Executive Officer, Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Exhibit 31Compensation.~~01, Exhibit 31.02, Exhibit 32.01 and Exhibit 32.02 hereto, respectively, are applicable with respect to each Series individually, as well as to the Fund as a whole.~~

~~Item~~The 9BFund has no employees, officers or directors and is managed by Superfund Capital Management. ~~Other~~None ~~Information~~of the directors or officers of Superfund Capital Management receive compensation from the Fund. Superfund Capital Management receives a monthly management fee of one-twelfth of 2.25% of month-end net assets (2.25% per annum). Superfund Capital Management will also be paid a monthly performance fee equal to 25% of any new appreciation without respect to interest income or any changes in net asset value due changes in value of the Fund’s dollar for dollar gold position. Trading losses will be carried forward and no further incentive fee may be paid until the prior losses have been recovered. In addition, Superfund Capital Management receives a portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the Fund in connection with its futures trading. Superfund USA, LLC, an entity related to Superfund Capital Management by common ownership (“Superfund USA”), is paid selling commissions equal to 2% of the month-end net asset value per Series A-1 Unit and Series B-1 Unit (one-twelfth of 2% per month). These amounts are included under “Selling commission” in the

~~There was~~16 ~~no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2012 that was not reported on Form 8-K.~~

~~Item~~ Statements 10of Operations. ~~Directors~~However, ~~Executive~~the ~~Officers~~maximum cumulative selling commission per Unit is limited to 10% of the gross offering proceeds price of such Unit. Each Series and ~~Corporate~~Superfund ~~Governance~~USA may retain additional selling agents to assist with the placement of the Units. Superfund USA will pay all or a portion of the selling commission described above which it receives in respect of the Units sold by the additional selling agents to the additional selling agents effecting the sales.

~~Identification~~Item 12. Security Ownership of ~~Directors~~Certain Beneficial Owners and ~~Executive~~Management ~~Officers~~and Related Stockholder Matters.

~~The~~Securities ~~Fund~~Authorized ~~has~~for ~~no directors~~Issuance orunder ~~executive~~Equity ~~officers.~~Compensation ~~The~~Plans Fund has no employees. It is managed by Superfund Capital Management in its capacity as general partner. Superfund Capital Management has been registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator since May 2001. Its main business address is Superfund Office Building, P.O. Box 1479, Grand Anse, St. George’s, Grenada, West Indies, (473) 439-2418. Superfund Capital Management’s directors and executive officers are as follows:

NIGEL JAMES, age 32, was appointed as President of Superfund Capital Management on July 13, 2006, and was listed as a principal and registered as an associated person with Superfund Capital Management on November 28, 2006, and May 23, 2007, respectivelyNone. Mr. James has been an employee of various members of the Superfund group of affiliated companies since July 2003 when he became a software developer for Superfund Trading Management, Inc., an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management that acts as a commodity trading advisor to non-U.S. funds. In May 2005, he was promoted to the role of Intellectual Technology Project Manager for Superfund Trading Management, Inc. where he managed a team focused on conceptual analysis and design of trading software. Mr. James graduated from the University of the West Indies in Barbados with a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science and Management in May 2003 and began his employment in July 2003. Mr. James is a citizen of Grenada.

~~MARTIN~~Security ~~SCHNEIDER,~~Ownership ~~age 46, was appointed Vice President, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and sole Director~~ of ~~Superfund Capital Management on July 28, 2010.~~Certain ~~Mr. Schneider~~Beneficial ~~was~~Owners listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management on August 19, 2010. From May 1997 to June 2001, Mr. Schneider served as Sales Director for Nike, Inc., an international retailer, in the company’s European divisions. From July 2001 to July 2002, Mr. Schneider held the position of Commercial Director for FC Tirol Innsbruck, a former Austrian football club. In this position, Mr. Schneider was responsible for the promotional activities of the organization. Mr. Schneider spent August 2002 preparing for his transition to the Superfund group of financial companies. From September 2002 to March 2005, Mr. Schneider functioned as the sports marketing director for Quadriga Asset Management GmbH, a financial services company, and as the Executive Vice President of the successor company, Superfund Marketing and Sports Sponsoring Inc., a marketing services company. In April 2005, Mr. Schneider assumed the role of Operating Manager for Superfund Group Monaco, a financial services company, a position he held until his appointment to Superfund Capital Management in June 2010. In the position of Operating Manager, Mr. Schneider conducted internal operational and financial audits of members of the Superfund group of affiliated financial companies. Mr. Schneider is a graduate of TGM Technical School in Vienna, Austria, with a degree in mechanical engineering. Mr. Schneider is a citizen of Austria.

24All of the Fund’s general partner interest is held by Superfund Capital Management.

~~Table~~Security Ownership of ~~Contents~~Management

~~GIZELA~~As ~~BENEDEK, age 34, was appointed Treasurer~~ of ~~Superfund Capital Management on~~ ~~July~~February 28, ~~2010.~~2014, ~~Ms. Benedek~~no ~~will~~Units ~~also~~were ~~serve~~owned asor ~~Audit~~held ~~Committee~~by ~~Financial~~officers ~~Expert for the Fund. Ms. Benedek was listed as a principal~~ of Superfund Capital Management ~~on September 10, 2010~~. ~~From~~As ~~June 2000 to September 2005, Ms. Benedek served as an Associate~~ of ~~PricewaterhouseCoopers~~February 28, ~~an international accounting firm~~2014, inSuperfund ~~its~~Capital ~~tax~~Management ~~consulting~~owned ~~group in Vienna, Austria~~111.49 InUnits ~~this~~of ~~position, Ms.~~Series ~~Benedek~~A-1 ~~provided~~(non-voting), ~~tax~~representing ~~consulting~~2.12% ~~services~~of tothe ~~investment~~total ~~companies. From~~issued ~~October~~Units ~~2005~~of ~~to December 2005~~Series A-1, ~~Ms. Benedek~~and ~~conducted intensive research in connection with her master thesis~~64.743 ~~From~~Units ~~January~~of ~~2006 to July 2008~~Series B-1, Msrepresenting 4. ~~Benedek~~51% ~~held the position~~ of ~~Auditing Associate in~~ the ~~auditing~~total ~~group~~issued Units of ~~RSM~~Series B-1 ~~Exacta Wirtschaftsprufung AG~~(non-voting), anhaving ~~Austrian~~a ~~auditing~~combined ~~and~~value ~~tax~~of ~~consultancy firm. In this position~~$200, Ms211. ~~Benedek~~36. ~~provided~~Losses ~~auditing~~allocated ~~services~~ to ~~private~~Units ~~foundations~~of ~~and~~Series ~~mid~~A-~~market~~1 ~~companies.~~and ~~From~~Series ~~August~~B-1 ~~2008~~owned ~~through August 2009, she was granted educational~~by ~~leave~~Superfund ~~sponsored~~Capital byManagement ~~the~~were ~~Austrian~~$260,564 ~~government to study~~ for the ~~U.S.~~year ~~CPA~~ended ~~exam~~December 31, 2013. ~~Since~~Superfund ~~September~~Capital ~~2009,~~Management ~~Ms. Benedek~~did ~~has~~not ~~held~~make ~~the~~any ~~role~~contributions ofto ~~Financial~~or ~~Counsel~~withdrawals ~~for~~from ~~Superfund~~any ~~Distribution~~Series ~~and~~during ~~Investment,~~this ~~Inc~~period., aSuperfund ~~financial~~Capital ~~services~~Management’s ~~company~~ownership ~~located in~~of ~~Grenada,~~Units ~~West~~of ~~Indies.~~Series InA-1 ~~this~~and ~~role,~~Series ~~Ms. Benedek~~B-1 ~~engages~~is included in ~~various~~the ~~internal~~overall ~~accounting~~changes ~~and~~in ~~auditing~~capital ~~functions.~~activity ~~Ms. Benedek~~reported isin athe ~~graduate~~Statements of ~~The~~Changes ~~University~~in ofNet ~~Economics~~Assets. ~~and~~Christian ~~Business~~Baha ~~Administration~~is inthe ~~Vienna,~~ultimate ~~Austria,~~beneficial ~~and~~owner isof aall ~~certified public~~of ~~accountant.~~the ~~Ms. Benedek~~equity isof aSuperfund ~~citizen~~Capital ~~of Austria~~Management.

~~CHRISTIAN~~Changes ~~BAHA, age 44, is Superfund Capital Management’s founder and sole owner. By December 1991, Mr. Baha began working independently to develop software for the technical analysis of financial data~~ in ~~Austria.~~Control In January 1995, Mr. Baha founded the first members of the Superfund group of affiliated companies specializing in managed futures funds and began to develop a worldwide distribution network. With profit sharing rights certificates, Mr. Baha launched an alternative investment vehicle for private investors. Launched on March 8, 1996, this product is called the Superfund Unternehmens-Beteiligungs-Aktiengesellschaft (Superfund Q-AG), and was formerly known as Quadriga Beteiligungs & Vermögens AG (Quadriga AG). In March 2003, a new generation of managed futures funds was internationally launched under the brand name “Superfund” and previously existing products have since been re-branded under this name. Simultaneously with the development of the Quadriga/Superfund group of affiliated companies, Mr. Baha founded the software company TeleTrader AG, which has been listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange since March 2001. He was listed as a principal of Superfund Advisors, Inc., a CFTC registered commodity pool operator, on November 20, 2009, however, such listing was withdrawn as of November 26, 2011. He was registered as an associated person and listed as a principal of Superfund Asset Management, Inc., a CFTC registered introducing broker, effective as of July 23, 1999 and June 24, 1997, respectively, until it withdrew its registration on July 12, 2012. He is registered as an associated person and listed as a principal of Superfund Asset Management LLC, a CFTC registered introducing broker, positions which he has held since June 11, 2012 and April 26, 2012. He has also been listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management since May 9, 2001. He was registered as an associated person of Superfund Capital Management on May 9, 2001 as well, however, such registration was subsequently withdrawn on February 17, 2009. Mr. Baha is listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management because he is its sole owner. Mr. Baha was also listed as a principal of Superfund USA, Inc., a former broker dealer that was previously registered as a commodity pool operator with the CFTC from August 14, 2009 through September 4, 2010, from August 13, 2009 through September 4, 2010 because he is the sole owner of the foregoing entity. He is a graduate of the police academy in Vienna, Austria and studied at the Business University of Vienna, Austria. Mr. Baha is a citizen of Austria.

~~Identification~~None. ~~of Certain Significant Employees~~

~~Family~~See ~~Relationships~~“Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance”, “Item 11, Executive Compensation” and “Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.” In 2013, the Series A management fee totaled $267,413, the Series A selling commissions totaled $186,577 and the Series A brokerage commissions totaled $231,669. In 2013, the Series B management fee totaled $136,131, the Series B selling commissions totaled $51,716 and the Series B brokerage commissions totaled $172,723. In 2012, the Series A management fee totaled $382,247, the Series A selling commissions totaled $270,220 and the Series A brokerage commissions totaled $347,717. In 2012, the Series B management fee totaled $211,520, the Series B selling commissions totaled $104,986 and the Series B brokerage commissions totaled $289,361.

~~None~~Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

~~Business~~Audit ~~Experience~~ Fees

~~See~~The ~~“Identification~~aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by McGladrey LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with their audit of ~~Directors~~the Fund’s financial statements, reviews of the financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and ~~Executive~~other services ~~Officers~~normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the years ended December 31,” ~~above~~2013 and December 31, 2012, were approximately $101,000 and $127,500, respectively.

~~Involvement~~Audit-Related inFees ~~Certain Legal Proceedings~~

There ~~has~~were ~~never~~no audit-related ~~been~~fees afor ~~material~~services ~~administrative,~~rendered ~~civil~~by orMcGladrey ~~criminal~~LLP ~~order, judgment, decree~~ or ~~finding~~Deloitte & ~~against~~Touche ~~Superfund~~LLP ~~Capital~~for ~~Management~~the oryears ~~any~~ended ~~of its directors~~December 31, ~~executive~~2013 ~~officers~~and December 31, ~~promoters or control persons~~2012.

~~Code~~Tax ofFees ~~Ethics~~

~~The~~There ~~Fund~~were ~~has~~ no ~~employees,~~fees ~~officers~~for ~~or directors and is managed by Superfund Capital Management. Superfund Capital Management has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer,~~tax ~~principal~~compliance, ~~financial~~tax ~~officer~~advice ~~and~~or ~~its~~tax ~~principal~~planning ~~accounting~~rendered ~~officer.~~by AMcGladrey ~~copy~~LLP ofor ~~the~~Deloitte & ~~code~~Touche ofLLP ~~ethics~~for ~~may be obtained at no charge by written request to~~ the ~~corporate~~years ~~secretary~~ended ~~of Superfund Capital Management~~December 31, ~~Superfund~~2013 ~~Office~~and ~~Building~~December 31, P2012.O. ~~Box 1479, Grand Anse, St. George’s, Grenada, West Indies.~~

~~Board~~All ofOther ~~Director~~Fees ~~Nominees~~

~~Not~~There ~~applicable~~were no other fees for products or services provided by McGladrey LLP or Deloitte & Touche LLP for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

25Pre-Approval Policies

~~Table~~The Board of Directors ~~Contents~~and Audit Committee of Superfund Capital Management approved all of the services described above. The Board of Directors and Audit Committee have determined that the payments made to its independent accountants for these services are compatible with maintaining such auditors’ independence. The Board of Directors pre-approves all audit and non-audit services and all engagement fees and terms.

~~Audit~~17 ~~Committee Financial Expert~~

~~Item~~PART ~~11.~~IV ~~Executive Compensation.~~

~~The~~Item ~~Fund has no employees, officers or directors and is managed by Superfund Capital Management~~15. None of the directors or officers of Superfund Capital Management receive compensation from the Fund. Superfund Capital Management receives a monthly management fee of one-twelfth of 2.25% of month-end net assets (2.25% per annum). Superfund Capital Management will also be paid a monthly performance fee equal to 25% of any new appreciation without respect to interest income or any changes in net asset value due changes in value of the Fund’s dollar for dollar gold position. Trading losses will be carried forward and no further incentive fee may be paid until the prior losses have been recovered. In additionExhibits, ~~Superfund~~Financial ~~Asset~~Statement Management, LLC, an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management, serves as the introducing broker for the Fund’s futures transactions and receives a portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the Fund in connection with its futures tradingSchedules. Superfund USA, LLC, an entity related to Superfund Capital Management by common ownership (“Superfund USA”), is paid selling commissions equal to 2% of the month-end net asset value per Series A-1 Unit and Series B-1 Unit (one-twelfth of 2% per month). These amounts are included under “Selling commission” in the Statements of Operations. However, the maximum cumulative selling commission per Unit is limited to 10% of the gross offering proceeds price of such Unit. Each Series and Superfund USA may retain additional selling agents to assist with the placement of the Units. Superfund USA will pay all or a portion of the selling commission described above which it receives in respect of the Units sold by the additional selling agents to the additional selling agents effecting the sales.

~~Item~~(a) ~~12.~~The ~~Security~~Following ~~Ownership~~documents ofare ~~Certain~~filed ~~Beneficial~~as ~~Owners~~part ~~and~~of ~~Management~~this ~~and Related Stockholder Matters.~~report:

~~Securities~~(1) ~~Authorized~~Financial ~~for~~Statements ~~Issuance~~beginning ~~under~~on ~~Equity~~page ~~Compensation~~25 ~~Plans~~ hereof.

~~None.~~(2) Financial Statement Schedules:

~~Security~~Financial ~~Ownership~~statement ofschedules ~~Certain~~have ~~Beneficial~~been ~~Owners~~omitted because they are not required or because equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

~~All~~(3) ofExhibits ~~the~~as ~~Fund’s~~required ~~general~~by ~~partner~~Item ~~interest~~601 isof ~~held~~Regulation ~~by Superfund Capital Management~~S-K.

~~Security~~The ~~Ownership~~following exhibits ofare ~~Management~~included herewith.

As of December 31, 2012, no Units were owned or held by officers of Superfund Capital Management. As of December 31, 2012, Superfund Capital Management owned 514.918 Units of Series A-1 (non-voting), representing 6.11% of the total issued Units of Series A-1, and 434.258 Units of Series B-1, representing 13.33% of the total issued Units of Series B-1 (non-voting), having a combined value of $1,215,022. Losses allocated to Units of Series A-1 and Series B-1 owned by Superfund Capital Management were $94,552 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Superfund Capital Management did not make any contributions to or withdrawals from any Series during this period. Superfund Capital Management’s ownership of Units of Series A-1 and Series A-2 is included in the overall changes in capital activity reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets. Christian Baha is the holder of all of the equity of Superfund Capital Management.


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

31.01		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer

31.02		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

32.01		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer

32.02		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labe Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

~~Changes~~The infollowing ~~Control~~exhibits are incorporated by reference herein from the exhibits of the same description and number filed on April 12, 2013, with Superfund Gold, L.P.’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-179534).

None.


3.02		Form of Third Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Registrant.

10.02		Form of Subscription Agreement.

~~Item~~The following exhibits are incorporated by reference herein from the exhibits of the same description and number filed on February 13, 2009, with Amendment No. 3 ~~Certain~~to ~~Relationships~~Superfund ~~and~~Gold, ~~Related~~L.P.’s ~~Transactions~~Registration ~~and~~Statement ~~Director~~on ~~Independence~~Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-151632).

~~See~~3.01 ~~“Item~~Certificate 10of ~~Directors,~~Limited ~~Executive~~Partnership ~~Officers and Corporate Governance”, “Item 11, Executive Compensation” and “Item 12, Security Ownership~~ of ~~Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters.” In 2012,~~ the ~~Series A management fee totaled $382,247, the Series A selling commissions totaled $270,220, the Series A incentive fee totaled $0 and the Series A brokerage commissions totaled $347,717~~Registrant. In 2012, the Series B management fee totaled $289,361, the Series B selling commissions totaled $104,986, the Series B incentive fee totaled $0 and the Series B brokerage commissions totaled $289,361. In 2011, the Series A management fee totaled $383,509, the Series A selling commissions totaled $272,237, the Series A incentive fee totaled $243,449 and the Series A brokerage commissions totaled $255,210. In 2011, the Series B management fee totaled $287,138, the Series B selling commissions totaled $156,375, the Series B incentive fee totaled $405,490 and the Series B brokerage commissions totaled $286,128.

~~Item~~18 ~~14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.~~

~~The~~EXHIBIT aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with their audit of the Fund’s financial statements, reviews of the financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, were approximately $127,500 and $108,725, respectively13.01

26REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

~~Table~~To the Partners of ~~Contents~~Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B:

~~Audit~~We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Superfund Gold, L.P., Superfund Gold, L.P. -~~Related~~ ~~Fees~~Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B (collectively the “Funds”), including the condensed schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

~~There~~We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were nowe engaged to perform, an audit~~-related~~ ~~fees~~of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for ~~services~~designing ~~rendered~~audit byprocedures ~~Deloitte &~~that ~~Touche~~are ~~LLP~~appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the ~~years~~purpose ~~ended~~of ~~December 31~~expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, ~~2012~~we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and ~~December 31~~disclosures in the financial statements, ~~2011~~assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~Tax~~In ~~Fees~~our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Superfund Gold, L.P., Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B as of December 31, 2013, and the results of their operations, changes in net assets, and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~There~~/S/ ~~were~~McGLADREY ~~no fees for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning rendered by Deloitte & Touche~~ LLP ~~for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.~~

~~All~~Chicago, ~~Other~~Illinois ~~Fees~~

~~There~~March ~~were no other fees for products or services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the years ended December 31~~27, ~~2012~~2014 ~~and December 31, 2011.~~

~~Pre-Approval~~19 ~~Policies~~

~~PART~~REPORT IVOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

~~Item~~To ~~15.~~the ~~Exhibits~~Partners of Superfund Gold, ~~Financial~~L.P. ~~Statement~~- ~~Schedules~~Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Superfund Gold, L.P., Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B (acollectively the “Funds”), ~~The~~including ~~Following~~the ~~documents~~condensed ~~are~~schedules ~~filed~~of investments, as ~~part~~of December 31, 2012, and the related statements of ~~this~~operations, ~~report:~~changes in net assets, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (1United States). ~~Financial~~Those ~~Statements~~standards ~~beginning~~require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on ~~page~~the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, ~~hereof~~2012, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~(2)~~In ~~Financial~~our ~~Statement~~opinion, ~~Schedules:~~the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Superfund Gold, L.P., Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B as of December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations, changes in net assets, and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~Financial~~/S/ ~~statement~~DELOITTE & ~~schedules~~TOUCHE ~~have~~LLP ~~been omitted because they are not required or because equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or notes thereto.~~

~~(3)~~Philadelphia, ~~Exhibits as required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.~~Pennsylvania

~~The~~March 26, ~~following~~2013 ~~exhibits are included herewith.~~

Exhibit Number		Description of Document
31.01		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
31.02		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
32.01		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
32.02 101.INS* 101.SCH* 101.CAL* 101.DEF* 101.LAB* 101.PRE*		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer XBRL Instance Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labe Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

~~The~~SUPERFUND ~~following exhibits are incorporated by reference herein from the exhibits of the same description and number filed on May 11~~GOLD, ~~2012, with Amendment No. 1 to Superfund Gold,~~ L.P.’s ~~Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-179534).~~

3.02		Formof Third Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Registrant.
10.02		Form of Subscription Agreement.

STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

~~The~~as ~~following exhibits are incorporated by reference herein from the exhibits~~ of ~~the same description and number filed on February~~December 1331, ~~2009,~~2013 ~~with~~and ~~Amendment No.~~December ~~3 to Superfund Gold~~31, ~~L.P.’s~~2012 ~~Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-151632).~~

3.01	Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Registrant.
	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
10.01	Form of Administration Agreement between the Registrant and the Administrator.
ASSETS
Due from brokers	$	7,856,372	$	13,552,648
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		3		182,189
Unrealized gain on futures contracts purchased		434,347		30,068
Unrealized gain on futures contracts sold		336,188		155,131
Cash		5,499,481		9,250,263
Total assets		14,126,391		23,170,299
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		5		101,789
Unrealized loss on futures contracts purchased		623,378		89,610
Unrealized loss on futures contracts sold		190,551		—
Subscriptions received in advance		15,000		84,515
Redemptions payable		583,958		444,547
Management fees payable		24,932		42,929
Fees payable		22,160		40,220
Total liabilities		1,459,984		803,610
NET ASSETS	$	12,666,407	$	22,366,689

27See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~Table~~21 ~~of Contents~~

~~REPORT~~SUPERFUND OFGOLD, ~~INDEPENDENT~~L.P. ~~REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~

ToCONDENSED ~~the~~SCHEDULE ~~Partners~~OF ofINVESTMENTS ~~Superfund Gold, L.P.—Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P.—Series B:~~

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Superfund Gold, L.P., Superfund Gold, L.P.—Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P.—Series B (collectively the “Funds”), including the condensed schedules of investments, as of December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2012, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


	Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		0.0	*%	$	3

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		0.0	*		3

Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		(0.0	)*		(5	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(0.0	)*		(5	)

Total forward contracts, at fair value		(0.0	)*%	$	(2	)

Futures contracts purchased
Currency		0.2	%	$	20,369
Energy		(0.5	)		(64,665	)
Financial		(0.1	)		(11,330	)
Food & Fiber		(0.2	)		(30,514	)
Indices		1.7			212,720
Livestock		(0.0	)*		(4,820	)
Metals		(2.5	)		(310,791	)

Total futures contracts purchased		(1.4	)		(189,031	)

Futures contracts sold
Currency		0.5			63,135
Energy		0.8			104,221
Financial		0.5			61,459
Food & Fiber		(0.1	)		(11,040	)
Metals		(0.6	)		(72,138	)

Total futures contracts sold		1.1			145,637

Total futures contracts, at fair value		(0.3	)%	$	(43,394	)

Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australia		(0.1	)%	$	(17,985	)
European Monetary Union		0.0	*		268
Great Britain		0.0	*		6,192
Japan		0.1			13,085
United States		(0.8	)		(97,305	)
Other		0.4			52,349

Total futures and forward contracts by country composition		(0.3	)%	$	(43,396	)

~~In our~~* ~~opinion,~~Due ~~the financial statements referred~~ to ~~above~~rounding ~~present~~– ~~fairly,~~amount inis ~~all~~less ~~material~~than ~~respects, the financial position of the Superfund Gold, L~~0.P., Superfund Gold, L.P.—Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P.—Series B as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations, changes in net assets, and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 05%

~~/s/~~See ~~DELOITTE~~accompanying &notes ~~TOUCHE~~to ~~LLP~~financial statements.

~~Philadelphia,~~22 ~~Pennsylvania~~

28SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.

~~Table~~CONDENSED ofSCHEDULE ~~Contents~~OF INVESTMENTS

~~SUPERFUND~~as ~~GOLD~~of December 31, ~~L.P.~~2012

STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


	Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		0.8	%	$	182,189

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		0.8			182,189

Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		(0.4	)		(101,789	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(0.4	)		(101,789	)

Total forward contracts, at fair value		0.4	%	$	80,400

Futures contracts purchased
Currency		(0.0	)*%	$	(10,164	)
Energy		0.4			93,730
Financial		0.7			157,123
Indices		1.2			269,955
Metals		(2.6	)		(570,186	)

Total futures contracts purchased		(0.3	)		(59,542	)

Futures contracts sold
Currency		1.2			258,209
Energy		(0.0	)*		(2,904	)
Financial		0.0	*		1,613
Food & Fiber		0.5			120,345
Indices		(0.0	)*		(504	)
Metals		(1.0	)		(221,628	)

Total futures contracts sold		0.7			155,131

Total futures contracts, at fair value		0.4	%	$	95,589

Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australia		0.2	%	$	33,214
European Monetary Union		(0.1	)		(22,837	)
Great Britain		(0.1	)		(15,450	)
Japan		1.3			282,720
United States		(1.3	)		(284,465	)
Other		0.8			182,807

Total futures and forward contracts by country composition		0.8	%	$	175,989

~~December 31,~~* ~~2012~~Due ~~and~~to ~~December 31,~~rounding ~~2011~~– amount is less than 0.05%

	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
ASSETS
US Government securities, at fair value,(amortized cost of $6,400,000 as of December 31, 2011)	$	—	$	6,400,000
Due from brokers		13,552,648		17,505,597
Futures contracts purchased		30,068		—
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		182,189		134,988
Futures contracts sold		155,131		378,483
Cash		9,250,263		5,304,787
Total assets		23,170,299		29,723,855
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		101,789		95,397
Futures contracts purchased		89,610		2,237,362
Subscriptions received in advance		84,515		914,000
Redemptions payable		444,547		904,938
Management fee payable		42,929		107,656
Fees payable		40,220		105,056
Total liabilities		803,610		4,364,409
NET ASSETS	$	22,366,689	$	25,359,446

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~See~~23 ~~accompanying notes to financial statements.~~

~~Table~~SUPERFUND ofGOLD, ~~Contents~~L.P.

~~SUPERFUND~~STATEMENTS ~~GOLD,~~OF ~~L.P.~~OPERATIONS

~~CONDENSED~~Years ~~SCHEDULE~~Ended OFDecember 31, ~~INVESTMENTS~~2013 and December 31, 2012

December 31, 2012


	2013			2012
Investment income
Interest income	$	2,297		$	3,425
Other income		63			970

Total investment income		2,360			4,395

Expenses
Brokerage commissions		404,392			637,078
Management fee		403,544			593,767
Selling commission		238,293			375,206
Operating expenses		134,518			197,922
Loss on MF Global		—			12,764
Other		17,792			18,874

Total expenses		1,198,539			1,835,611

Net investment loss	$	(1,196,179	)	$	(1,831,216	)

Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net realized loss on futures and forward contracts	$	(2,542,045	)	$	(1,633,508	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		(219,385	)		1,995,277

Net gain (loss) on investments	$	(2,761,430	)	$	361,769

Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(3,957,609	)	$	(1,469,447	)

	Percentage ofNet Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts
Currency		0.8	%	$	182,189
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts		0.8			182,189
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts
Currency		(0.5	)		(101,789	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts		(0.5	)		(101,789	)
Total forward contracts, at fair value		0.4	%	$	80,400
Futures contracts, at fair value
Futures contracts purchased
Currency		(0.0	)*%	$	(10,164	)
Energy		0.4			93,730
Financial		0.7			157,123
Indices		1.2			269,955
Metals		(2.5	)		(570,186	)
Total futures contracts purchased		(0.3	)		(59,542	)
Futures contracts sold
Currency		1.2			258,209
Energy		(0.0	) *		(2,904	)
Financial		0.0	*		1,613
Food & Fiber		0.5			120,345
Indices		(0.0	) *		(504	)
Metals		(1.0	)		(221,628	)
Total futures contracts sold		0.7			155,131
Total futures contracts, at fair value		0.4	%	$	95,589
Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australian		0.1	%	$	33,214
European Monetary Union		(0.1	)		(22,837	)
Great Britain		(0.1	)		(15,450	)
Japan		1.3			282,720
United States		(1.3	)		(284,465	)
Other		0.8			182,807
Total futures and forward contracts by country		0.8	%	$	175,989

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

*24 ~~Due to rounding~~

30SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.

~~Table~~STATEMENTS ofOF ~~Contents~~CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

~~SUPERFUND~~Years ~~GOLD~~Ended December 31, ~~L.P.~~2013 and December 31, 2012

CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS


	2013			2012
Decrease in net assets from operations
Net investment loss	$	(1,196,179	)	$	(1,831,216	)
Net realized loss on futures and forward contracts		(2,542,045	)		(1,633,508	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		(219,385	)		1,995,277

Net decrease in net assets from operations		(3,957,609	)		(1,469,447	)

Capital share transactions
Issuance of Units		2,375,231			3,810,089
Redemption of Units		(8,117,904	)		(5,333,399	)

Net decrease in net assets from capital share transactions		(5,742,673	)		(1,523,310	)

Net decrease in net assets		(9,700,282	)		(2,992,757	)
Net assets, beginning of year		22,366,689			25,359,446

Net assets, end of year	$	12,666,407		$	22,366,689

~~December 31,~~See ~~2011~~accompanying notes to financial statements.

	Face Value		Percentage ofNet Assets			Fair Value
Debt Securities United States, at fair value
United States Treasury Bills due February 23, 2012 (amortized cost $6,400,000), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards	$	6,400,000		25.2	%	$	6,400,000
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts
Currency				0.5			134,988
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts				0.5			134,988
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts
Currency				(0.4	)		(95,397	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts				(0.4	)		(95,397	)
Total forward contracts, at fair value				0.2	%	$	39,591
Futures contracts, at fair value
Futures contracts purchased
Currency				0.3	%	$	68,483
Energy				(0.3	)		(86,639	)
Financial
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note				0.0	*		1,954
Other				0.0	*		3,926
Total Financial				0.0	*		5,880
Food & Fiber				0.1			30,713
Indices				0.0	*		8,193
Metals
171 contracts of CMX Gold expiring February 2012				(8.8	)		(2,228,620	)
Other				(0.1	)		(35,372	)
Total Metals				(8.9	)		(2,263,992	)
Total futures contracts purchased				(8.8	)		(2,237,362	)
Futures contracts sold
Currency				0.3			85,282
Energy				0.3			84,680
Financial				(0.0	) *		(11,937	)
Food & Fiber				0.1			23,297
Indices				0.2			58,871
Livestock				0.1			18,950
Metals				0.5			119,340
Total futures contracts sold				1.5			378,483
Total futures contracts, at fair value				(7.3	)%	$	(1,858,879	)
Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australian				0.1	%	$	13,630
European Monetary Union				0.3			69,960
Great Britain				0.0	*		5,614
Japan				0.4			106,637
United States				(8.1	)		(2,048,725	)
Other				0.1			33,596
Total futures and forward contracts by country				(7.2	)%	$	(1,819,288	)

~~See~~SUPERFUND ~~accompanying~~GOLD, ~~notes to financial statements~~L.P.

31STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

~~Table~~Years ofEnded ~~Contents~~December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.


	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(3,957,609	)	$	(1,469,447	)
Adjustment to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Purchases of U.S. government securities		—			(7,948,374	)
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities		—			14,350,000
Amortization of discounts and premiums		—			(1,626	)
Increase in due from brokers		5,696,276			3,952,949
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		182,186			(47,201	)
Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(101,784	)		6,392
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased		129,489			(2,177,820	)
Increase in futures contracts sold		9,494			223,352
Decrease in management fees payable		(17,997	)		(64,727	)
Decrease in fees payable		(18,060	)		(64,836	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,921,995			6,758,662

Cash flows from financing activities
Subscriptions, net of change in advanced subscriptions		2,305,716			2,980,604
Redemptions, net of change in redemptions payable		(7,978,493	)		(5,793,790	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(5,672,777	)		(2,813,186	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(3,750,782	)		3,945,476
Cash, beginning of year		9,250,263			5,304,787

Cash, end of year	$	5,499,481		$	9,250,263

~~STATEMENTS~~See OFaccompanying ~~OPERATIONS~~notes to financial statements.

~~Years~~26 ~~Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011~~

	2012			2011
Investment income
Interest income	$	3,425		$	11,848
Other income		970			—
Total income		4,395			11,848
Expenses
Incentive fee		—			648,939
Management fee		593,767			670,647
Brokerage commissions		637,078			541,338
Selling commission		375,206			428,612
Operating expenses		197,922			223,546
Loss on MF Global		12,764			194,753
Other		18,874			16,766
Total expenses		1,835,611			2,724,601
Net investment loss		(1,831,216	)		(2,712,753	)
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts		(1,633,508	)		5,588,766
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		1,995,277			(4,490,529	)
Net gain on investments		361,769			1,098,237
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(1,469,447	)	$	(1,614,516	)

~~See~~SUPERFUND ~~accompanying~~GOLD, ~~notes~~L.P. to– ~~financial~~SERIES ~~statements.~~A

32STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

~~Table~~as of ~~Contents~~December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.


	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Due from brokers	$	4,366,891	$	8,151,334
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		3		111,557
Unrealized gain on futures contracts purchased		254,637		—
Unrealized gain on futures contracts sold		177,920		85,248
Cash		4,314,062		7,542,936

Total assets		9,113,513		15,891,075

LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		1		60,610
Unrealized loss on futures contracts purchased		379,957		89,610
Unrealized loss on futures contracts sold		110,852		—
Subscriptions received in advance		15,000		78,764
Redemptions payable		279,141		280,745
Management fees payable		16,139		29,368
Fees payable		16,219		29,552

Total liabilities		817,309		568,649

NET ASSETS	$	8,296,204	$	15,322,426

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-1 Net Assets	$	6,261,154	$	11,986,641

Number of Units outstanding		5,778.843		8,423.300

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-1 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	1,083.46	$	1,423.03

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-2 Net Assets	$	2,035,050	$	3,335,785

Number of Units outstanding		1,660.757		2,114.666

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-2 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	1,225.37	$	1,577.45

~~STATEMENTS~~See OFaccompanying ~~CHANGES~~notes INto ~~NET~~financial ~~ASSETS~~statements.

~~Years~~27 ~~Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011~~

	2012			2011
Decrease in net assets from operations
Net investment loss	$	(1,831,216	)	$	(2,712,753	)
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts		(1,633,508	)		5,588,766
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		1,995,277			(4,490,529	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations		(1,469,447	)		(1,614,516	)
Capital share transactions
Issuance of Units		3,810,089			10,736,259
Redemption of Units		(5,333,399	)		(10,437,522	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions		(1,523,310	)		298,737
Net decrease in net assets		(2,992,757	)		(1,315,779	)
Net assets, beginning of year		25,359,446			26,675,225
Net assets, end of year	$	22,366,689		$	25,359,446

~~See~~SUPERFUND ~~accompanying~~GOLD, ~~notes~~L.P. to– ~~financial~~SERIES ~~statements.~~A

33CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

~~Table~~as of December 31, ~~Contents~~2013

SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.


	Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		0.0	*%	$	3

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		0.0	*		3

Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		(0.0	)*		(1	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(0.0	)*		(1	)

Total forward contracts, at fair value		0.0	*%	$	2

Futures contracts purchased
Currency		0.1	%	$	11,719
Energy		(0.3	)		(24,089	)
Financial		(0.1	)		(6,327	)
Food & Fiber		(0.2	)		(15,802	)
Indices		1.4			120,148
Livestock		(0.0	)*		(3,020	)
Metals		(2.4	)		(207,949	)

Total futures contracts purchased		(1.5	)		(125,320	)

Futures contracts sold
Currency		0.4			35,289
Energy		0.7			55,379
Financial		0.4			31,349
Food & Fiber		(0.1	)		(6,357	)
Metals		(0.6	)		(48,592	)

Total futures contracts sold		0.8			67,068

Total futures contracts, at fair value		(0.7	)%	$	(58,252	)

Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australia		(0.1	)%	$	(10,382	)
European Monetary Union		0.0	*		124
Great Britain		0.0	*		2,552
Japan		0.1			9,002
United States		(1.1	)		(88,697	)
Other		0.4			29,151

Total futures and forward contracts by country composition		(0.7	)%	$	(58,250	)

~~STATEMENTS~~* OFDue ~~CASH~~to ~~FLOWS~~rounding – amount is less than 0.05%

~~Years~~See ~~Ended~~accompanying ~~December 31,~~notes ~~2012~~to financial ~~and~~statements. ~~December 31, 2011~~

	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(1,469,447	)	$	(1,614,516	)
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Purchases of U.S. government securities		(7,948,374	)		(33,946,385	)
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities		14,350,000			37,148,549
Amortization of discounts and premiums		(1,626	)		(4,077	)
Increase (decrease) in due from brokers		3,952,949			(4,700,166	)
Increase (decrease) in due from affiliate		—			5,599
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		(47,201	)		89,597
Increase in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		6,392			58,937
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased		(2,177,820	)		5,070,283
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts sold		223,352			(728,288	)
Increase (decrease) in incentive fee payable		—			(409,223	)
Increase (decrease) in management fee		(64,727	)		56,250
Increase (decrease) in fees payable		(64,836	)		55,871
Net cash provided by operating activities		6,758,662			1,082,431
Cash flows from financing activities
Subscriptions, net of advance subscriptions		2,980,604			10,360,842
Redemptions, net of redemptions payable		(5,793,790	)		(9,768,911	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(2,813,186	)		591,931
Net increase in cash		3,945,476			1,674,362
Cash, beginning of year		5,304,787			3,630,425
Cash, end of year	$	9,250,263		$	5,304,787

34SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. – SERIES A

~~Table~~CONDENSED ofSCHEDULE ~~Contents~~OF INVESTMENTS

~~SUPERFUND~~as ~~GOLD~~of December 31, ~~L.P.~~2012 ~~- SERIES A~~

STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


	Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		0.7	%	$	111,557

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		0.7			111,557

Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		(0.4	)		(60,610	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(0.4	)		(60,610	)

Total forward contracts, at fair value		0.3	%	$	50,947

Futures contracts purchased
Currency		(0.0	)*%	$	(5,989	)
Energy		0.4			53,671
Financial		0.6			92,894
Indices		1.1			164,177
Metals		(2.6	)		(394,363	)

Total futures contracts purchased		(0.5	)		(89,610	)

Futures contracts sold
Currency		1.0			146,281
Energy		(0.1	)		(6,395	)
Financial		0.0	*		1,033
Food & Fiber		0.5			69,879
Indices		(0.0	)*		(277	)
Metals		(0.8	)		(125,273	)

Total futures contracts sold		0.6			85,248

Total futures contracts, at fair value		(0.0	)*%	$	(4,362	)

Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australia		0.1	%	$	18,911
European Monetary Union		(0.1	)		(13,510	)
Great Britain		(0.1	)		(10,846	)
Japan		1.1			170,893
United States		(1.4	)		(228,553	)
Other		0.7			109,690

Total futures and forward contracts by country composition		0.3	%	$	46,585

~~December 31,~~* ~~2012~~Due ~~and~~to ~~December 31,~~rounding ~~2011~~ – amount is less than 0.05%

	December 31,2012		December 31,2011
ASSETS
US Government securities, at fair value (amortized cost of $3,700,000 as of December 31, 2011)	$	—	$	3,700,000
Due from brokers		8,151,334		10,182,255
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		111,557		69,300
Futures contracts sold		85,248		189,971
Cash		7,542,936		4,325,976
Total assets		15,891,075		18,467,502
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		60,610		51,238
Futures contracts purchased		89,610		1,411,823
Subscriptions received in advance		78,764		336,000
Redemptions payable		280,745		711,068
Management fee payable		29,368		67,674
Fees payable		29,552		70,546
Total liabilities		568,649		2,648,349
NET ASSETS	$	15,322,426	$	15,819,153
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-1 Net Assets	$	11,986,641	$	12,507,057
Number of Units outstanding		8,423.300		8,359.510
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-1 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	1,423.03	$	1,496.15
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-2 Net Assets	$	3,335,785	$	3,312,096
Number of Units outstanding		2,114.666		2,037.421
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-2 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	1,577.45	$	1,625.63

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~See~~29 ~~accompanying notes to financial statements.~~

~~Table~~SUPERFUND ofGOLD, ~~Contents~~L.P. – SERIES A

~~SUPERFUND~~STATEMENTS ~~GOLD,~~OF ~~L.P.~~OPERATIONS ~~- SERIES A~~

~~CONDENSED~~Years ~~SCHEDULE~~Ended OFDecember 31, ~~INVESTMENTS~~2013 and December 31, 2012

December 31, 2012


	2013			2012
Investment income
Interest income	$	1,395		$	1,885
Other income		44			520

Total investment income		1,439			2,405

Expenses
Brokerage commissions		231,669			347,717
Management fee		267,413			382,247
Selling commission		186,577			270,220
Operating expenses		89,141			127,416
Loss on MF Global		—			6,925
Other		6,573			7,984

Total expenses		781,373			1,142,509

Net investment loss	$	(779,934	)	$	(1,140,104	)

Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net realized loss on futures and forward contracts	$	(2,075,408	)	$	(871,078	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		(104,835	)		1,250,375

Net gain (loss) on investments	$	(2,180,243	)	$	379,297

Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(2,960,177	)	$	(760,807	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series A-1 Unit (based upon weighted average number of units outstanding during period)*	$	(335.31	)	$	(78.96	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series A-1 Unit (based upon change in net asset value per unit during period)	$	(339.57	)	$	(73.12	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series A-2 Unit (based upon weighted average number of units outstanding during period) **	$	(350.02	)	$	(39.22	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series A-2 Unit (based upon change in net asset value per unit during period)	$	(352.08	)	$	(48.18	)

	Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts
Currency		0.7	%	$	111,557
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts		0.7			111,557
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts
Currency		(0.4	)		(60,610	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts		(0.4	)		(60,610	)
Total forward contracts, at fair value		0.3	%	$	50,947
Futures Contracts, at fair value
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currency		(0.0	)*%	$	(5,989	)
Energy		0.4			53,671
Financial		0.6			92,894
Indices		1.1			164,177
Metals		(2.6	)		(394,363	)
Total futures contracts purchased		(0.5	)		(89,610	)
Futures Contracts Sold
Currency		1.0			146,281
Energy		(0.1	)		(6,395	)
Financial		0.0	*		1,033
Food & Fiber		0.5			69,879
Indices		(0.0	) *		(277	)
Metals		(0.8	)		(125,273	)
Total futures contracts sold		0.6			85,248
Total futures contracts, at fair value		(0.0	)*%	$	(4,362	)
Futures contracts by country composition
Australia		0.1	%	$	18,911
European Monetary Union		(0.1	)		(13,510	)
Great Britain		(0.1	)		(10,846	)
Japan		1.1			170,893
United States		(1.4	)		(228,553	)
Other		0.7			109,690
Total futures contracts by country		0.3	%	$	46,585
* Due to rounding
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

*	Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series A-1 for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: 7,041.299 and 8,629.77, respectively.

36** Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series A-2 for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: 1,711.685 and 2,024.35, respectively.

~~Table~~See ofaccompanying ~~Contents~~notes to financial statements.

~~SUPERFUND~~30 ~~GOLD, L.P. - SERIES A~~

~~December 31~~SUPERFUND GOLD, ~~2011~~L.P. – SERIES A

	Face Value		Percentage ofNet Assets			Fair Value
Debt Securities United States, at fair value
United States Treasury Bills due February 23, 2012 (amortized cost $3,700,000), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards	$	3,700,000		23.4	%	$	3,700,000
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts
Currency				0.4			69,300
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts				0.4			69,300
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts
Currency				(0.3	)		(51,238	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts				(0.3	)		(51,238	)
Total forward contracts, at fair value				0.1	%	$	18,062
Futures Contracts, at fair value
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currency				0.2	%	$	36,900
Energy				(0.3	)		(45,053	)
Financial
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note				0.0	*		1,016
Other				0.0	*		1,598
Total Financial				0.0	*		2,614
Food & Fiber				0.1			16,738
Indices				0.0	*		4,717
Metals
108 contracts of CMX Gold expiring February 2012				(8.9	)		(1,407,280	)
Other				(0.1	)		(20,459	)
Total Metals				(9.0	)		(1,427,739	)
Total futures contracts purchased				(9.0	)		(1,411,823	)
Futures Contracts Sold
Currency				0.3			43,963
Energy				0.3			42,480
Financial				(0.0	)*		(6,656	)
Food & Fiber				0.1			11,607
Indices				0.2			26,026
Livestock				0.1			9,670
Metals				0.4			62,881
Total futures contracts sold				1.4			189,971
Total futures contracts, at fair value				(7.6	)%	$	(1,221,852	)
Futures contracts by country composition
Australia				0.1	%	$	8,242
European Monetary Union				0.2			36,313
Great Britain				0.0	*		2,711
Japan				0.3			55,550
United States				(8.2	)		(1,316,556	)
Other				0.1			9,950
Total futures contracts by country				(7.5	)%	$	(1,203,790	)

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

*Years ~~Due~~Ended December 31, to2013 ~~rounding~~and December 31, 2012

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


	2013			2012
Decrease in net assets from operations
Net investment loss	$	(779,934	)	$	(1,140,104	)
Net realized loss on futures and forward contracts		(2,075,408	)		(871,078	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		(104,835	)		1,250,375

Net decrease in net assets from operations		(2,960,177	)		(760,807	)
Capital share transactions
Issuance of Units		1,173,915			2,783,531
Redemption of Units		(5,239,960	)		(2,519,451	)

Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions		(4,066,045	)		264,080

Net decrease in net assets		(7,026,222	)		(496,727	)
Net assets, beginning of year		15,322,426			15,819,153

Net assets, end of year	$	8,296,204		$	15,322,426

Series A-1 Units, beginning of year		8,423.300			8,359.510
Issuance of Series A-1 Units		339.090			1,481.653
Redemption of Units		(2,983.547	)		(1,417.863	)

Series A-1 Units, end of year		5,778.843			8,423.300

Series A-2 Units, beginning of year		2,114.666			2,037.421
Issuance of Series A-2 Units		494.337			293.053
Redemption of Units		(948.246	)		(215.808	)

Series A-2 Units, end of year		1,660.757			2,114.666

37See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~Table~~31 ~~of Contents~~

~~STATEMENTS~~SUPERFUND OFGOLD, ~~OPERATIONS~~L.P. – SERIES A

~~Years~~STATEMENTS ~~Ended~~OF ~~December 31,~~CASH ~~2012~~FLOWS ~~and December 31, 2011~~

	2012			2011
Investment income
Interest income	$	1,885		$	6,191
Other income		520			—
Total income		2,405			6,191
Expenses
Incentive fee		—			243,449
Management fee		382,247			383,509
Brokerage commissions		347,717			255,210
Selling commission		270,220			272,237
Operating expenses		127,416			127,836
Loss on MF Global		6,925			93,232
Other		7,984			5,651
Total expenses		1,142,509			1,381,124
Net investment loss		(1,140,104	)		(1,374,933	)
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts		(871,078	)		2,767,330
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)on futures and forward contracts		1,250,375			(2,413,790	)
Net gain on investments		379,297			353,540
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(760,807	)	$	(1,021,393	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (basedupon weighted average number of Units outstanding duringyear) for Series A-1*	$	(78.96	)	$	(103.81	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (basedupon change in net asset value per Unit during year) forSeries A-1	$	(73.12	)	$	(70.50	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (basedupon weighted average number of Units outstanding duringyear) for Series A-2**	$	(39.22	)	$	(96.66	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (basedupon change in net asset value per Unit during year) forSeries A-2	$	(48.18	)	$	(45.37	)

Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

* Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series A-1 for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011: 8,629.77 and 8,066.50, respectively.


	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(2,960,177	)	$	(760,807	)
Adjustment to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Purchases of U.S. government securities		—			(4,249,133	)
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities		—			7,950,000
Amortization of discounts and premiums		—			(867	)
Increase in due from brokers		3,784,443			2,030,921
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		111,554			(42,257	)
Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(60,609	)		9,372
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased		35,710			(1,322,213	)
Increase in futures contracts sold		18,180			104,723
Decrease in management fees payable		(13,229	)		(38,306	)
Decrease in fees payable		(13,333	)		(40,994	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		902,539			3,640,439

Cash flows from financing activities
Subscriptions, net of change in advanced subscriptions		1,110,151			2,526,295
Redemptions, net of change in redemptions payable		(5,241,564	)		(2,949,774	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(4,131,413	)		(423,479	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(3,228,874	)		3,216,960
Cash, beginning of year		7,542,936			4,325,976

Cash, end of year	$	4,314,062		$	7,542,936

**See ~~Weighted~~accompanying ~~average~~notes ~~number~~to offinancial ~~Units outstanding for Series A-2 for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011: 2,024~~statements.35 ~~and 1,903.44, respectively.~~

~~See~~32 ~~accompanying notes to financial statements.~~

~~Table~~SUPERFUND ofGOLD, ~~Contents~~L.P. – SERIES B

~~SUPERFUND~~STATEMENTS ~~GOLD,~~OF ~~L.P.~~ASSETS -AND ~~SERIES~~LIABILITIES A

~~STATEMENTS~~as OFof ~~CHANGES~~December 31, IN2013 ~~NET~~and ~~ASSETS~~December 31, 2012

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011


	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Due from brokers	$	3,489,481	$	5,401,314
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		—		70,632
Unrealized gain on futures contracts purchased		179,710		30,068
Unrealized gain on futures contracts sold		158,268		69,883
Cash		1,185,419		1,707,327

Total assets		5,012,878		7,279,224

LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		4		41,179
Unrealized loss on futures contracts purchased		243,421		—
Unrealized loss on futures contracts sold		79,699		—
Subscriptions received in advance		—		5,751
Redemptions payable		304,817		163,802
Management fees payable		8,793		13,561
Fees payable		5,941		10,668

Total liabilities		642,675		234,961

NET ASSETS	$	4,370,203	$	7,044,263

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-1 Net Assets	$	1,689,188	$	3,618,576

Number of Units outstanding		1,849.736		3,258.284

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-1 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	913.20	$	1,110.58

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-2 Net Assets	$	2,681,015	$	3,425,687

Number of Units outstanding		2,691.953		2,885.689

Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-2 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	995.94	$	1,187.13

	2012			2011
Decrease in net assets from operations:
Net investment loss	$	(1,140,104	)	$	(1,374,933	)
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts		(871,078	)		2,767,330
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		1,250,375			(2,413,790	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations		(760,807	)		(1,021,393	)
Capital share transactions
Issuance of Units		2,783,531			8,156,974
Redemption of Units		(2,519,451	)		(5,033,119	)
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions		264,080			3,123,855
Net increase (decrease) in net assets		(496,727	)		2,102,462
Net assets, beginning of year		15,819,153			13,716,691
Net assets, end of year	$	15,322,426		$	15,819,153
Series A-1 Units, beginning of year		8,359.510			6,916.044
Issuance of Series A-1 Units		1,481.653			3,951.118
Redemption of Series A-1 Units		(1,417.863	)		(2,507.652	)
Series A-1 Units, end of year		8,423.300			8,359.510
Series A-2 Units, beginning of year		2,037.421			1,724.508
Issuance of Series A-2 Units		293.053			877.402
Redemption of Series A-2 Units		(215.808	)		(564.489	)
Series A-2 Units, end of year		2,114.666			2,037.421

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~See~~33 ~~accompanying notes to financial statements.~~

~~Table~~SUPERFUND ofGOLD, ~~Contents~~L.P. – SERIES B

~~SUPERFUND~~CONDENSED ~~GOLD,~~SCHEDULE ~~L.P.~~OF -INVESTMENTS ~~SERIES A~~

~~STATEMENTS~~as OFof December 31, ~~CASH~~2013 ~~FLOWS~~

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011


	Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts
Currency		(0.0	)*%		(4	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(0.0	)*		(4	)

Total forward contracts, at fair value		(0.0	)*%	$	(4	)

Futures contracts purchased
Currency		0.2	%	$	8,650
Energy		(0.9	)		(40,576	)
Financial		(0.1	)		(5,003	)
Food & Fiber		(0.3	)		(14,712	)
Indices		2.1			92,572
Livestock		(0.0	)*		(1,800	)
Metals		(2.5	)		(102,842	)

Total futures contracts purchased		(1.5	)		(63,711	)

Futures contracts sold
Currency		0.6			27,846
Energy		1.1			48,842
Financial		0.7			30,110
Food & Fiber		(0.1	)		(4,683	)
Metals		(0.5	)		(23,546	)

Total futures contracts sold		1.8			78,569

Total futures contracts, at fair value		0.3	%	$	14,858

Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australia		(0.2	)%	$	(7,603	)
European Monetary Union		0.0	*		144
Great Britain		0.1			3,640
Japan		0.1			4,083
United States		(0.2	)		(8,608	)
Other		0.5			23,198

Total futures and forward contracts by country composition		0.3	%	$	14,854

	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(760,807	)	$	(1,021,393	)
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Purchases of U.S. government securities		(4,249,133	)		(18,148,163	)
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities		7,950,000			19,399,271
Amortization of discounts and premiums		(867	)		(2,089	)
Increase (decrease) in due from brokers		2,030,921			(3,668,457	)
Increase (decrease) in due from affiliate		—			5,599
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		(42,257	)		26,455
Increase in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		9,372			37,381
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased		(1,322,213	)		2,683,769
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts sold		104,723			(333,815	)
Increase (decrease) in incentive fee		—			(198,986	)
Increase (decrease) in management fee		(38,306	)		41,402
Increase (decrease) in fees payable		(40,994	)		43,324
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		3,640,439			(1,135,702	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Subscriptions, net of subscriptions received in advance		2,526,295			7,610,644
Redemptions, net of redemptions payable		(2,949,774	)		(4,364,498	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(423,479	)		3,246,146
Net increase in cash		3,216,960			2,110,444
Cash, beginning of year		4,325,976			2,215,532
Cash, end of year	$	7,542,936		$	4,325,976

*	Due to rounding – amount is less than 0.05%

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4034

SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. -– SERIES B

~~STATEMENTS~~CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF ~~ASSETS~~INVESTMENTS ~~AND LIABILITIES~~

as of December 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~

	December 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value
ASSETS
Forward contracts, at fair value
US Government securities, at fair value (amortized cost of $2,700,000 as of December 31, 2011)	$	—		$	2,700,000
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts
Due from brokers		5,401,314			7,323,342
Currency		1.0	%		70,632
Futures contracts purchased		30,068			—
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		1.0		$	70,632
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		70,632			65,688
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts
Futures contracts sold		69,883			188,512
Currency		(0.6	)		(41,179	)
Cash		1,707,327			978,811
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(0.6	)		(41,179	)
Total assets		7,279,224			11,256,353
Total forward contracts, at fair value		0.4	%	$	29,453
LIABILITIES
Futures contracts purchased
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		41,179			44,159
Currency		(0.1	)%	$	(4,175	)
Futures contracts purchased		—			825,539
Energy		0.6			40,059
Subscriptions received in advance		5,751			578,000
Financial		0.9			64,229
Redemptions payable		163,802			193,870
Indices		1.5			105,778
Management fee payable		13,561			39,982
Metals		(2.5	)		(175,823	)
Fees payable		10,668			34,510
Total futures contracts purchased		0.4			30,068
Total liabilities		234,961			1,716,060
Futures contracts sold
NET ASSETS	$	7,044,263		$	9,540,293
Currency		1.6			111,928
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-1 Net Assets	$	3,618,576		$	5,617,352
Energy		0.1			3,491
Number of Units outstanding		3,258.284			4,524.265
Financial		0.0	*		580
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-1 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	1,110.58		$	1,241.61
Food & Fiber		0.7			50,466
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-2 Net Assets	$	3,425,687		$	3,922,941
Indices		(0.0	)*		(227	)
Number of Units outstanding		2,885.689			3,015.557
Metals		(1.4	)		(96,355	)
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-2 Net Asset Value per Unit	$	1,187.13		$	1,300.90
Total futures contracts sold		1.0			69,883
Total futures contracts, at fair value		1.4	%	$	99,951
Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australia		0.2	%	$	14,303
European Monetary Union		(0.1	)		(9,327	)
Great Britain		(0.1	)		(4,604	)
Japan		1.6			111,827
United States		(0.8	)		(55,912	)
Other		1.0			73,117
Total futures and forward contracts by country composition		1.8	%	$	129,404

~~See~~* ~~accompanying~~Due ~~notes~~ to ~~financial~~rounding ~~statements.~~– amount is less than 0.05%

41See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~Table~~35 ~~of Contents~~

~~CONDENSED~~SUPERFUND ~~SCHEDULE~~GOLD, OFL.P. ~~INVESTMENTS~~– SERIES B

~~December 31,~~STATEMENTS ~~2012~~OF OPERATIONS

	Percentage of
	Net Assets			Fair Value
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts
Currency		1.0	%	$	70,632
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts		1.0			70,632
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts
Currency		(0.6	)		(41,179	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts		(0.6	)		(41,179	)
Total forward contracts, at fair value		0.4	%	$	29,453
Futures contracts, at fair value
Futures contracts purchased
Currency		(0.1	)%	$	(4,175	)
Energy		0.6			40,059
Financial		0.9			64,229
Indices		1.5			105,778
Metals		(2.5	)		(175,823	)
Total futures contracts purchased		0.4			30,068
Futures contracts sold
Currency		1.6			111,928
Energy		0.1			3,491
Financial		0.0	*		580
Food & Fiber		0.7			50,466
Indices		(0.0	) *		(227	)
Metals		(1.4	)		(96,355	)
Total futures contracts sold		1.0			69,883
Total futures contracts, at fair value		1.4	%	$	99,951
Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australian		0.2	%	$	14,303
European Monetary Union		(0.1	)		(9,327	)
Great Britain		(0.1	)		(4,604	)
Japan		1.6			111,827
United States		(0.8	)		(55,912	)
Other		1.0			73,117
Total futures and forward contracts by country		1.8	%	$	129,404

Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

* Due to rounding


	2013			2012
Investment income
Interest income	$	902		$	1,540
Other income		19			450

Total investment income		921			1,990

Expenses
Brokerage commissions		172,723			289,361
Management fee		136,131			211,520
Selling commission		51,716			104,986
Operating expenses		45,377			70,506
Loss on MF Global		—			5,839
Other		11,219			10,890

Total expenses		417,166			693,102

Net investment loss	$	(416,245	)	$	(691,112	)

Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net realized loss on futures and forward contracts	$	(466,637	)	$	(762,430	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		(114,550	)		744,902

Net loss on investments	$	(581,187	)	$	(17,528	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(997,432	)	$	(708,640	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series B-1 Unit (based upon weighted average number of units outstanding during period)*	$	(177.73	)	$	(105.27	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series B-1 Unit (based upon change in net asset value per unit during period)	$	(197.38	)	$	(131.03	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series B-2 Unit (based upon weighted average number of units outstanding during period) **	$	(198.06	)	$	(89.97	)

Net decrease in net assets from operations per Series B-2 Unit (based upon change in net asset value per unit during period)	$	(191.19	)	$	(113.77	)

~~See~~* ~~accompanying~~Weighted ~~notes~~average ~~to financial~~number ~~statements~~of Units outstanding for Series B-1 for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: 2,318.575 and 4,102.09, respectively.

42** Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series B-2 for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: 2,955.433 and 3,076.50, respectively.

~~Table~~See ofaccompanying ~~Contents~~notes to financial statements.

~~SUPERFUND~~36 ~~GOLD, L.P. - SERIES B~~

~~December 31~~SUPERFUND GOLD, ~~2011~~L.P. – SERIES B

			Percentage of
	Face Value		Net Assets			Fair Value
Debt Securities United States, at fair value
United States Treasury Bills due February 23, 2012 (amortized cost $2,700,000), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards	$	2,700,000		28.3	%	$	2,700,000
Forward contracts, at fair value
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts
Currency				0.7			65,688
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts				0.7			65,688
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts
Currency				(0.5	)		(44,159	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts				(0.5	)		(44,159	)
Total forward contracts, at fair value				0.2	%	$	21,529
Futures contracts, at fair value
Futures contracts purchased
Currency				0.3	%	$	31,583
Energy				(0.4	)		(41,586	)
Financial
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note				0.0	*		938
Other				0.0	*		2,328
Total Financial				0.0	*		3,266
Food & Fiber				0.1			13,975
Indices				0.0	*		3,476
Metals
63 contracts of CMX Gold expiring February 2012				(8.6	)		(821,340	)
Other				(0.2	)		(14,913	)
Total Metals				(8.8	)		(836,253	)
Total futures contracts purchased				(8.8	)		(825,539	)
Futures contracts sold
Currency				0.4			41,319
Energy				0.4			42,200
Financial				(0.1	)		(5,281	)
Food & Fiber				0.1			11,690
Indices				0.3			32,845
Livestock				0.1			9,280
Metals				0.6			56,459
Total futures contracts sold				1.8			188,512
Total futures contracts, at fair value				(7.0	)%	$	(637,027	)
Futures and forward contracts by country composition
Australian				0.1	%	$	5,388
European Monetary Union				0.3			33,647
Great Britain				0.0	*		2,903
Japan				0.4			51,087
United States				(7.8	)		(732,169	)
Other				0.2			23,646
Total futures and forward contracts by country				(6.8	)%	$	(615,498	)

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

*Years ~~Due~~Ended December 31, to2013 ~~rounding~~and December 31, 2012

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


	2013			2012
Decrease in net assets from operations
Net investment loss	$	(416,245	)	$	(691,112	)
Net realized loss on futures and forward contracts		(466,637	)		(762,430	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		(114,550	)		744,902

Net decrease in net assets from operations		(997,432	)		(708,640	)
Capital share transactions
Issuance of Units		1,201,316			1,026,558
Redemption of Units		(2,877,944	)		(2,813,948	)

Net decrease in net assets from capital share transactions		(1,676,628	)		(1,787,390	)

Net decrease in net assets		(2,674,060	)		(2,496,030	)
Net assets, beginning of year		7,044,263			9,540,293

Net assets, end of year	$	4,370,203		$	7,044,263

Series B-1 Units, beginning of year		3,258.284			4,524.265
Issuance of Series B-1 Units		184.070			309.453
Redemption of Units		(1,592.618	)		(1,575.434	)

Series B-1 Units, end of year		1,849.736			3,258.284

Series B-2 Units, beginning of year		2,885.689			3,015.557
Issuance of Series B-2 Units		787.099			512.776
Redemption of Units		(980.835	)		(642.644	)

Series B-2 Units, end of year		2,691.953			2,885.689

43See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~Table~~37 ~~of Contents~~

~~STATEMENTS~~SUPERFUND OFGOLD, ~~OPERATIONS~~L.P. – SERIES B

~~Years~~STATEMENTS ~~Ended~~OF ~~December 31,~~CASH ~~2012~~FLOWS ~~and December 31, 2011~~

	2012			2011
Investment income
Interest income	$	1,540		$	5,657
Other income		450			—
Total income		1,990			5,657
Expenses
Incentive fee		—			405,490
Management fee		211,520			287,138
Brokerage commissions		289,361			286,128
Selling commission		104,986			156,375
Operating expenses		70,506			95,710
Loss on MF Global		5,839			101,521
Other		10,890			11,115
Total expenses		693,102			1,343,477
Net investment loss		(691,112	)		(1,337,820	)
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward Contracts		(762,430	)		2,821,436
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		744,902			(2,076,739	)
Net gain (loss) on investments		(17,528	)		744,697
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(708,640	)	$	(593,123	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average number of Units outstanding during year) for Series B-1*	$	(105.27	)	$	(78.44	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit during year) for Series B-1	$	(131.03	)	$	(109.60	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average number of Units outstanding during year) for Series B-2**	$	(89.97	)	$	(50.73	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit during year) for Series B-2	$	(113.77	)	$	(88.90	)

Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

* Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series B-1 for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011: 4,102.09 and 5,422.14, respectively.


	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(997,432	)	$	(708,640	)
Adjustment to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Purchases of U.S. government securities		—			(3,699,241	)
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities		—			6,400,000
Amortization of discounts and premiums		—			(759	)
Increase in due from brokers		1,911,833			1,922,028
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		70,632			(4,944	)
Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(41,175	)		(2,980	)
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased		93,779			(855,607	)
Increase in futures contracts sold		(8,686	)		118,629
Decrease in management fees payable		(4,768	)		(26,421	)
Decrease in fees payable		(4,727	)		(23,842	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,019,456			3,118,223

Cash flows from financing activities
Subscriptions, net of change in advanced subscriptions		1,195,565			454,309
Redemptions, net of change in redemptions payable		(2,736,929	)		(2,844,016	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(1,541,364	)		(2,389,707	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(521,908	)		728,516
Cash, beginning of year		1,707,327			978,811

Cash, end of year	$	1,185,419		$	1,707,327

**See ~~Weighted~~accompanying ~~average~~notes ~~number~~to offinancial ~~Units outstanding for Series B-2 for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011: 3,076~~statements.50 ~~and 3,340.25, respectively.~~

~~See~~38 ~~accompanying notes to financial statements.~~

~~Table~~SUPERFUND ofGOLD, ~~Contents~~L.P., SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. – SERIES A and SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. – SERIES B

~~SUPERFUND~~NOTES ~~GOLD,~~TO ~~L.P.~~FINANCIAL –STATEMENTS ~~SERIES B~~

~~STATEMENTS~~December 31, OF2013 ~~CHANGES IN NET ASSETS~~

~~Years~~(1) ~~Ended~~Nature ~~December 31,~~of ~~2012 and December 31, 2011~~ Operations

	2012			2011
Decrease in net assets from operations
Net investment loss	$	(691,112	)	$	(1,337,820	)
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts		(762,430	)		2,821,436
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts		744,902			(2,076,739	)
Net decrease in net assets from operations		(708,640	)		(593,123	)
Capital share transactions
Issuance of Units		1,026,558			2,579,285
Redemption of Units		(2,813,948	)		(5,404,403	)
Net decrease in net assets from capital share transactions		(1,787,390	)		(2,825,118	)
Net decrease in net assets		(2,496,030	)		(3,418,241	)
Net assets, beginning of year		9,540,293			12,958,534
Net assets, end of year	$	7,044,263		$	9,540,293
Series B-1 Units, beginning of year		4,524.265			5,784.122
Issuance of Series B-1 Units		309.453			1,527.856
Redemption of Series B-1 Units		(1,575.434	)		(2,787.713	)
Series B-1 Units, end of year		3,258.284			4,524.265
Series B-2 Units, beginning of year		3,015.557			3,700.480
Issuance of Series B-2 Units		512.776			314.675
Redemption of Series B-2 Units		(642.644	)		(999.598	)
Series B-2 Units, end of year		2,885.689			3,015.557

Organization and Business

~~See~~Superfund ~~accompanying~~Gold, ~~notes~~L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Fund”), commenced operations on April 1, 2009. The Fund was organized to ~~financial~~trade ~~statements~~speculatively in the United States and international commodity futures and forward markets using a strategy developed by Superfund Capital Management, Inc., the general partner and trading advisor of the Fund (“Superfund Capital Management”). The Fund has issued two series of units of limited partnership interest (“Units”), each with a subseries, Series A-1/A-2 and Series B-1/B-2 (each a “Series”). Series A-1/A-2 and Series B-1/B-2 are traded and managed the same way, with the exception of the degree of leverage. Series B implements the Fund’s futures and forward trading program at a leverage level equal to approximately 1.5 times that implemented on behalf of Series A. Over the long term (periods of several years), the targeted average ratio of margin to equity for Series A is approximately 20% and approximately 30% for Series B. The leverage with which each of the Series is traded is the only difference between the Series. Sub-Series within a Series are not managed differently. Rather, Series A-1 Units and Series B-1 Units are subject to selling commissions. Series A-2 Units and Series B-2 Units are not subject to selling commissions but are available exclusively to: (i) investors participating in selling agent asset-based or fixed-fee investment programs or a registered investment adviser’s asset-based fee or fixed-fee advisory program through which an investment adviser recommends a portfolio allocation to the Fund and for which Superfund USA, LLC (“Superfund USA”) serves as selling agent, (ii) investors who purchased the Units through Superfund USA or an affiliated broker and who are commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and (iii) investors who have paid the maximum selling commission on their Series A-1 or Series B-1 Units (by re-designation of such Units as Series A-2 Units or Series B-2 Units as described herein). The foregoing eligibility requirements and selling commissions are the only differences between the Sub-Series within a Series.

45The term of the Fund commenced on the day on which the Certificate of Limited Partnership was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act and shall end upon the first to occur of the following: (i) receipt by Superfund Capital Management of an approval to dissolve the Fund at a specified time by Limited Partners owning Units representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding Units of each Series then owned by Limited Partners of each Series, notice of which is sent by certified mail return receipt requested to Superfund Capital Management not less than 90 days prior to the effective date of such dissolution; (ii) withdrawal, insolvency or dissolution of Superfund Capital Management or any other event that causes Superfund Capital Management to cease to be the general partner of the Fund, unless (a) at the time of each event there is at least one remaining general partner of the Fund who carries on the business of the Fund (and each remaining general partner of the Fund is hereby authorized to carry on the business of general partner of the Fund in such an event), or (b) within 120 days after such event Limited Partners of a Series holding a majority of Units of such Series agree in writing to continue the business of the Fund and such Series and to the appointment, effective as of the date of such event, of one or more general partners of the Fund and such Series; (iii) a decline in the aggregate net assets of each Series to less than $500,000 at any time following commencement of trading in the Series; or (iv) any other event which shall make it unlawful for the existence of the Fund to be continued or which requires termination of the Fund.

~~Table~~(2) Basis of ~~Contents~~Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

~~SUPERFUND~~(a) ~~GOLD,~~Basis ~~L.P.~~of ~~– SERIES B~~ Presentation

~~STATEMENTS~~Pursuant OFto ~~CASH~~rules ~~FLOWS~~and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), audited financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and presented for the Fund as a whole, as the SEC registrant, and for Series A and Series B individually. For the avoidance of doubt, the debts, liabilities, obligations and expenses incurred, contracted for or otherwise existing with respect to a particular Series shall be enforceable only against the assets of such Series and not against the assets of the Fund generally or any other Series. Accordingly, the assets of one Series of the Fund include only those funds and other assets that are paid to, held by or distributed to the Fund on account of and for the benefit of that Series, including, without limitation, funds delivered to the Fund for the purchase of Units in that Series.

~~Years~~(b) ~~Ended~~Valuation ~~December 31,~~of ~~2012~~Investments ~~and~~in ~~December 31,~~Futures ~~2011~~Contracts and Forward Contracts

	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(708,640	)	$	(593,123	)
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Purchases of U.S. government securities		(3,699,241	)		(15,798,222	)
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities		6,400,000			17,749,278
Amortization of discounts and premiums		(759	)		(1,988	)
Increase (decrease) in due from brokers		1,922,028			(1,031,709	)
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		(4,944	)		63,142
Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(2,980	)		21,556
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased		(855,607	)		2,386,514
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts sold		118,629			(394,473	)
Increase (decrease) in incentive fee		—			(210,237	)
Increase (decrease) in management fee		(26,421	)		14,848
Increase (decrease) in fees payable		(23,842	)		12,547
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,118,223			2,218,133
Cash flows from financing activities
Subscriptions, net of subscriptions received in advance		454,309			2,750,198
Redemptions, net of redemptions payable		(2,844,016	)		(5,404,413	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,389,707	)		(2,654,215	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		728,516			(436,082	)
Cash, beginning of year		978,811			1,414,893
Cash, end of year	$	1,707,327		$	978,811

All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on a trade date basis and open contracts are recorded in the statements of assets and liabilities at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotes are readily available. Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at settlement prices published by the recognized exchange. Any spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund will be valued at published settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes.

~~See~~39 ~~accompanying notes to financial statements.~~

~~Table~~(c) Translation of ~~Contents~~Foreign Currency

~~SUPERFUND~~Assets ~~GOLD,~~and Lliabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.PS., ~~SUPERFUND~~dollar ~~GOLD,~~amounts Lat the period end exchange rates.P. –Purchases ~~SERIES~~and Asales of investments and ~~SUPERFUND~~income ~~GOLD,~~and Lexpenses that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.PS. –dollar amounts on the transaction ~~SERIES~~date. BAdjustments arising from foreign currency transactions are reflected in the statements of operations.

~~NOTES~~The TOFund ~~FINANCIAL~~does ~~STATEMENTS~~not isolate that portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the statements of operations.

~~December 31~~(d) Investment Transactions, ~~2012~~Investment Income and Expenses

~~(1)~~Investment ~~Nature~~transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Interest income and expenses are recognized on the accrual basis. Operating expenses of ~~Operations~~the Fund are allocated to each Series in proportion to the net asset value of the Series at the beginning of each month. Expenses directly attributable to a particular Series are charged directly to that Series.

~~Organization~~Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated. Unrealized gains and ~~Business~~losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of assets and liabilities as gross gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 210-20, Offsetting - Balance Sheet.

~~Superfund~~Set ~~Gold,~~forth ~~L.P.,~~herein aare ~~Delaware~~instruments ~~limited~~and ~~partnership~~transactions ~~(the~~eligible ~~“Fund”),~~for ~~commenced~~offset ~~operations on April 1, 2009. The Fund was organized to trade speculatively~~ in the ~~United~~Statements ~~States and international commodity futures and forward markets using a strategy developed by Superfund Capital Management, Inc., the general partner and trading advisor~~ of ~~the~~Assets ~~Fund (“Superfund Capital Management”). The Fund has issued two series of units of limited partnership interest (“Units”), each with a subseries, Series A-1/A-2~~ and ~~Series~~Liabilities ~~B-1/B-2 (each a “Series”). Series A-1/A-2~~ and ~~Series~~which ~~B-1/B-2~~ are ~~traded~~subject ~~and~~to derivative ~~managed~~clearing ~~the~~agreements ~~same way,~~ with the ~~exception of the degree of leverage. Series B implements the~~ Fund’s futures ~~and~~commission ~~forward~~merchants. ~~trading~~Each ~~program~~futures atcommission amerchant ~~leverage~~nets ~~level~~margin ~~equal~~held ~~to approximately 1.5 times that implemented~~ on behalf of each Series A. ~~Over~~of the ~~long~~Fund ~~term~~or ~~(periods~~payment obligations of ~~several years),~~ the ~~targeted average~~futures ~~ratio~~commission ofmerchant ~~margin~~ to ~~equity~~each ~~for~~ Series A isagainst any ~~approximately~~payment ~~20%~~obligations ~~and~~of ~~approximately~~that ~~30% for~~ Series B. ~~The~~to ~~leverage~~the ~~with~~futures ~~which~~commission ~~each~~merchant. ofEach ~~the~~ Series is ~~traded~~required isto ~~the~~deposit ~~only~~margin ~~difference~~at ~~between~~each ~~the~~futures ~~Series.~~commission ~~Sub-Series~~merchant ~~within~~to ameet ~~Series~~the ~~are~~original ~~not managed differently. Rather, Series A-1 Units~~ and ~~Series B-1~~maintenance ~~Units~~requirements ~~are~~established ~~subject~~by tothat ~~selling~~futures ~~commissions.~~commission merchant, ~~Series A-2 Units~~ and/or ~~Series B-2~~the ~~Units~~exchange ~~are~~or ~~not~~clearinghouse ~~subject~~associated towith ~~selling~~the ~~commissions~~exchange ~~but~~on ~~are~~which ~~available~~the ~~exclusively~~instrument ~~to: (i) investors~~is ~~participating~~traded. inThe ~~selling~~derivative ~~agent~~clearing ~~asset-based~~agreements orgive ~~fixed-fee~~each ~~investment~~futures ~~programs~~commission ormerchant a ~~registered~~security ~~investment~~interest ~~adviser’s~~in ~~asset-based~~this ~~fee~~margin orto ~~fixed-fee~~secure ~~advisory~~any ~~program~~liabilities ~~through~~owed to ~~which~~the anfutures ~~investment~~commission ~~adviser~~merchant ~~recommends~~arising from a ~~portfolio allocation~~default toby the ~~Fund~~Series. ~~and~~As ~~for~~of ~~which~~December 31, ~~Superfund USA~~2013, ~~LLC~~the ~~(“Superfund~~Fund ~~USA”)~~had ~~serves~~on asdeposit ~~selling agent~~$4,497,932 ~~(ii) investors~~at ~~who~~ADM ~~purchased~~Investor ~~the~~Services, ~~Units~~Inc., ~~through~~$621,042 ~~Superfund~~at ~~USA~~Barclays orCapital anInc. ~~affiliated broker~~ and ~~who~~$2,737,398 ~~are~~at ~~commodity~~Citigroup ~~pools~~Global ~~operated by commodity~~Markets ~~pool~~Inc. ~~operators~~As ~~registered~~of asDecember 31, ~~such~~2013, ~~with~~Series ~~the~~A ~~Commodity~~had ~~Futures~~on ~~Trading~~deposit ~~Commission~~$2,493,850 ~~and~~at ~~(iii) investors~~ADM ~~who~~Investor ~~have~~Services, ~~paid~~Inc., ~~the~~$218,513 ~~maximum~~at ~~selling~~Barclays ~~commission~~Capital onInc. ~~their~~and ~~Series A-~~$1,654,528 orat ~~Series B-1~~Citigroup ~~Units~~Global ~~(by~~Markets ~~re-designation~~Inc. As of ~~such Units as Series~~December ~~A-2~~31, ~~Units~~2013, or Series B-2 ~~Units~~had ason ~~described~~deposit ~~herein).~~$2,004,082 at ~~The~~ADM ~~foregoing~~Investor ~~eligibility~~Services, ~~requirements~~Inc., ~~and~~$402,529 ~~selling~~at ~~commissions~~Barclays ~~are~~Capital ~~the~~Inc. ~~only~~and ~~differences~~$1,082,870 ~~between~~at ~~the~~Citigroup ~~Sub-Series~~Global ~~within~~Markets ~~a Series~~Inc.

The term of the Fund commenced on the day on which the Certificate of Limited Partnership was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act and shall end upon the first to occur of the following: (ie) ~~receipt~~ byIncome Superfund Capital Management of an approval to dissolve the Fund at a specified time by Limited Partners owning Units representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding Units of each Series then owned by Limited Partners of each Series, notice of which is sent by certified mail return receipt requested to Superfund Capital Management not less than 90 days prior to the effective date of such dissolution; (ii) withdrawal, insolvency or dissolution of Superfund Capital Management or any other event that causes Superfund Capital Management to cease to be the general partner of the Fund, unless (a) at the time of each event there is at least one remaining general partner of the Fund who carries on the business of the Fund (and each remaining general partner of the Fund is hereby authorized to carry on the business of general partner of the Fund in such an event), or (b) within 120 days after such event Limited Partners of a Series holding a majority of Units of such Series agree in writing to continue the business of the Fund and such Series and to the appointment, effective as of the date of such event, of one or more general partners of the Fund and such Series; (iii) a decline in the aggregate net assets of each Series to less than $500,000 at any time following commencement of trading in the Series; or (iv) any other event which shall make it unlawful for the existence of the Fund to be continued or which requires termination of the Fund. Taxes

~~(2)~~The ~~Basis~~Fund does not record a provision for U.S. income taxes because the partners report their share of ~~Presentation~~the ~~and~~Fund’s ~~Significant~~income ~~Accounting~~or ~~Policies~~loss on their returns. The financial statements reflect the Fund’s transactions without adjustment, if any, required for income tax purposes.

Superfund Capital Management has evaluated the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes (a“ASC 740”) ~~Basis~~to the Fund, to determine whether or not there are uncertain tax positions that require financial statement recognition. Based on this evaluation, the Fund has determined no reserves for uncertain tax position are required to be recorded as a result of ~~Presentation~~the application of ASC 740. The Fund is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months. As a result, no income tax liability or expense has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements. The Fund files federal and various state tax returns. The 2010 through 2013 tax years generally remain subject to examination by the U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.

~~Pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission~~ (~~“SEC”~~f), ~~audited~~Use financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and presented for the Fund as a whole, as the SEC registrant, and for Series A and Series B individually. For the avoidance of doubt, the debts, liabilities, obligations and expenses incurred, contracted for or otherwise existing with respect to a particular Series shall be enforceable only against the assets of such Series and not against the assets of the Fund generally or any other Series. Accordingly, the assets of one Series of the Fund include only those funds and other assets that are paid to, held by or distributed to the Fund on account of and for the benefit of that Series, including, without limitation, funds delivered to the Fund for the purchase of Units in that Series. Estimates

~~(b)~~The ~~Valuation~~preparation of ~~Investments~~financial statements in ~~Futures~~conformity ~~Contracts,~~with ~~Forward~~U.S. GAAP ~~Contracts~~requires Superfund Capital Management to make estimates and Uassumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period.S ~~Treasury~~Actual ~~Bills~~results could differ from those estimates.

~~All commodity interests~~ (~~including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments~~g) ~~are~~Recently ~~used~~Issued ~~for~~Accounting trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on a trade date basis and open contracts are recorded in the statements of assets and liabilities at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotes are readily available. Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at settlement prices published by the recognized exchange. Any spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund will be valued at published settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury bills due to the short-term nature of such instruments; accordingly, the cost of securities plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, approximates fair value (See Note (2)(h) – Fair Value Measurements). Pronouncements

47ASU 2013-08

~~Table~~In June 2013, FASB ASU No. 2013-08, Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”). ASU 2013-08 contains new guidance regarding the approach to investment company assessment, requires non-controlling ownership interests in other investment companies to be measured at fair value and requires additional disclosures about the investment company’s status as an investment company and information required to be provided to any of ~~Contents~~its investees. The amendments in the update are effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. Superfund Capital Management is evaluating the impact of ASU 2013-08 on the financial statements and disclosures.

~~(c)~~40 ~~Translation of Foreign Currency~~

~~The~~ASU ~~Fund~~2011-11 does not isolate that portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the statements of operations.

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (d“ASU 2011-11”). ~~Investment~~ASU 2011-11 ~~Transactions~~requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. GAAP more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of assets and liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ~~Investment~~ASU ~~Income~~2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and ~~Expenses~~posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements.

~~Investment~~In ~~transactions~~January ~~are~~2013, ~~accounted~~FASB ~~for~~issued onguidance ato ~~trade-date~~clarify ~~basis~~the scope of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. ~~Interest~~The ~~income~~amendments clarify that the scope of guidance issued in December 2011 to enhance disclosures around financial instrument and ~~expenses~~derivative instruments that are ~~recognized~~either on(a) offset, ~~the~~or ~~accrual~~(b) subject ~~basis.~~to ~~The~~a master netting agreement or similar agreement, irrespective of ~~Fund~~whether ~~uses~~they ~~the~~are ~~amortized~~offset, ~~cost~~applies ~~method~~to ~~for~~derivatives, ~~valuing~~including ~~U.S.~~bifurcated ~~Treasury~~embedded ~~bills.~~derivatives, ~~Operating~~repurchase ~~expenses~~agreements ofand ~~the~~reverse ~~Fund~~repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are ~~allocated~~either offset or subject to ~~each~~an enforceable ~~Series~~master innetting ~~proportion~~arrangement toor ~~the~~similar ~~net~~agreement. ~~asset~~The ~~value~~amendments ofare ~~the~~effective ~~Series~~for atinterim ~~the~~and annual periods beginning ofon ~~each~~or ~~month~~after January 1, 2013. ~~Expenses~~Adoption ~~directly~~did ~~attributable~~not tohave a ~~particular~~ ~~Series~~material ~~are~~impact ~~charged~~on ~~directly~~the toFunds’ ~~that~~financial ~~Series~~statements.

~~Gains~~ASU or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated. Unrealized gains and losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of financial condition as a net gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 2102011-~~20,~~04 ~~Offsetting - Balance Sheet.~~

~~(e)~~In ~~Income~~May 2011, ~~Taxes~~FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Fund adopted ASU 2011-04 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Fund’s financial statement disclosures.

~~The~~(h) ~~Fund~~Fair ~~does~~Value not record a provision for U.S. income taxes because the partners report their share of the Fund’s income or loss on their returns. The financial statements reflect the Fund’s transactions without adjustment, if any, required for income tax purposes. Measurements

~~Superfund~~The ~~Capital~~Fund ~~Management~~follows ~~has evaluated the application of~~ ASC ~~740~~820, ~~Income~~Fair ~~Taxes~~Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC ~~740~~820”). toASC ~~the~~820 ~~Fund,~~establishes toa ~~determine~~fair ~~whether~~value orhierarchy ~~not there are uncertain tax positions~~ that ~~require~~prioritizes ~~financial statement recognition. Based on this evaluation,~~ the ~~Fund~~inputs ~~has~~to ~~determined~~valuation notechniques ~~reserves for~~used ~~uncertain tax position are required~~ to bemeasure ~~recorded~~fair ~~as a result of the application of ASC 740~~value. The ~~Fund~~hierarchy isgives ~~not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that~~ the ~~total~~highest ~~amounts~~priority ofto ~~unrecognized~~unadjusted ~~tax~~quoted ~~benefits~~prices ~~will change materially~~ in ~~the~~active ~~next~~markets for ~~twelve~~identical ~~months.~~assets ~~As a result, no income tax liability~~ or ~~expense~~liabilities ~~has~~(level ~~been~~1 ~~recorded~~measurements) inand the ~~accompanying~~lowest ~~financial~~priority ~~statements.~~to ~~The~~unobservable ~~Fund~~inputs ~~files~~(level ~~federal~~3 ~~and various state tax returns~~measurements). The ~~2009~~three ~~through~~levels ~~2012~~of ~~tax~~the ~~years~~fair ~~generally~~value ~~remain subject~~hierarchy tounder ~~examination~~ASC by820 ~~the~~are ~~U.S.~~described ~~federal~~below: ~~and most state tax authorities.~~

(f) Use of Estimates


Level 1		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2		Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3		Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

~~The~~A ~~preparation of~~ financial ~~statements~~instrument’s inlevel ~~conformity~~within ~~with~~the ~~U.S.~~fair ~~GAAP~~value ~~requires~~hierarchy ~~Superfund~~is ~~Capital~~based ~~Management~~on ~~to make estimates and assumptions that affect~~ the ~~reported~~lowest ~~amounts~~level of ~~assets and liabilities and~~any ~~disclosure~~input ofthat ~~contingent~~is ~~assets~~significant ~~and~~to ~~liabilities at~~ the ~~date~~fair ofvalue ~~the~~measurement. ~~financial~~In ~~statements~~determining ~~and~~fair value, the ~~reported~~Fund ~~amounts~~separates ofits ~~increases~~financial ~~and~~instruments ~~decreases~~into intwo ~~net~~categories: ~~assets from operations during the reporting period~~U.S. ~~Actual~~government ~~results~~securities ~~could~~and ~~differ~~derivative ~~from those estimates~~contracts.

Derivative Contracts. Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or over-the-counter (g“OTC”). ~~Recently~~Exchange-traded ~~Issued~~derivatives typically ~~Accounting~~fall ~~Pronouncements~~within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not. The Fund has exposure to exchange-traded derivative contracts through the Fund’s trading of exchange-traded futures contracts. The Fund’s exchange-traded futures contract positions are valued daily at settlement prices published by the applicable exchanges. In such cases, provided they are deemed to be actively traded, exchange- traded derivatives are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Less actively traded exchange-traded derivatives fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

~~ASU~~41 ~~2011-11~~

InOTC ~~January~~derivatives ~~2013,~~are ~~the~~valued ~~FASB~~using ~~issued~~market ~~guidance~~transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to ~~clarify~~models, ~~the~~model ~~scope~~calibration ofto ~~disclosures~~market-clearing ~~about~~transactions, ~~offsetting~~broker ~~assets~~or ~~and~~dealer ~~liabilities.~~quotations, ~~The~~or ~~amendments~~alternative ~~clarify~~pricing ~~that~~sources ~~the~~with ~~scope~~reasonable levels of ~~guidance~~price ~~issued~~transparency. inWhere ~~December~~models ~~2011~~are toused, ~~enhance~~the selection of a ~~disclosures~~particular ~~around~~model ~~financial~~to ~~instrument~~value ~~and~~an OTC derivative ~~instruments~~depends ~~that~~upon ~~are~~the ~~either~~contractual ~~(a) offset~~terms of, orand ~~(b) subject~~specific torisks ainherent ~~master~~in, ~~netting~~the ~~agreement~~instrument oras ~~similar~~well ~~agreement,~~as ~~irrespective~~the availability of ~~whether~~pricing ~~they~~information ~~are~~in ~~offset,~~the ~~applies~~market. toFor OTC derivatives, ~~including bifurcated~~that ~~embedded~~trade ~~derivatives~~in liquid markets, such ~~repurchase~~as ~~agreements~~generic forwards and ~~reverse~~swaps, ~~repurchase~~model ~~agreements,~~inputs ~~and~~can ~~securities~~generally ~~borrowing~~be verified and ~~securities~~model ~~lending~~selection ~~transactions~~does ~~that~~not ~~are~~involve ~~either~~significant ~~offset~~management orjudgment. ~~subject~~The toOTC anderivatives ~~enforceable~~held ~~master~~by ~~netting~~the ~~arrangement~~Fund ormay ~~similar agreement~~include forwards and swaps. ~~The~~Spot ~~amendments~~and ~~are~~forward ~~effective~~foreign ~~for~~currency contracts ~~interim~~held ~~and~~by ~~annual~~the ~~periods~~Fund ~~beginning~~are onvalued at published daily settlement prices or ~~after~~at ~~January 1,~~dealers’ ~~2013~~quotes. ~~Adoption~~The isFund’s ~~not~~forward ~~expected~~positions toare ~~have~~typically aclassified ~~material~~within ~~impact~~level 2 onof the ~~Funds’~~fair ~~financial~~value ~~statements~~hierarchy.

48Certain OTC derivatives traded in less liquid markets with limited pricing information, and the determination of fair value for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. Such instruments are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Where the Fund does not have corroborating market evidence to support significant model inputs and cannot verify the model to market transactions, transaction price is initially used as the best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so that the model value at inception equals the transaction price. The valuations of these less liquid OTC derivatives are typically based on level 1 and/or level 2 inputs that can be observed in the market for similar instruments, as well as unobservable level 3 inputs. Subsequent to initial recognition, the Fund updates the level 1 and level 2 inputs to reflect observable market changes, with resulting gains and losses reflected within level 3. Level 3 inputs are only changed when corroborated by evidence such as similar market transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or dealer quotations, or other empirical market data. In circumstances where the Fund cannot verify the model value to market transactions, it is possible that a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. The Fund attempts to avoid holding less liquid OTC derivatives. However, once held, the market for any particular derivative contract could become less liquid during the holding period.

~~Table~~As of ~~Contents~~and during the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Fund held no investments or derivative contracts valued using level 3 inputs.

~~ASU~~The ~~2011-04~~following table summarizes the valuation of the Fund’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2013:

InSuperfund ~~May 2011~~Gold, ~~FASB issued ASU No~~L. ~~2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U~~P.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Fund adopted ASU 2011-04 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Fund’s financial statement disclosures.

(h) Fair Value Measurements


	Balance December 31, 2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	3	$	—	$	3	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		434,347		434,347		—
Futures contracts sold		336,188		336,188		—		—

Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	770,538	$	770,535	$	3	$	—

LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	5	$	—	$	5	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		623,378		623,378		—		—
Futures contracts sold		190,551		190,551		—		—

Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	813,934	$	813,929	$	5	$	—

~~The~~Superfund ~~Fund follows ASC 820~~Gold, ~~Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”)~~L. ~~ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value~~P. ~~The~~– ~~hierarchy~~Series ~~gives~~A the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:

	Level 1		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
	BalanceDecember 31, 2013			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	Level 2		Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
ASSETS
	Level 3		Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	3		$	—	$	3	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		254,637			254,637		—
Futures contracts sold		177,920			177,920		—		—
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	432,560		$	432,557	$	3	$	—
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	1		$	—	$	1	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		379,957			379,957		—		—
Futures contracts sold		110,852			110,852		—		—
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	490,810		$	490,809	$	1	$	—

A42 financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In determining fair value, the Fund separates its financial instruments into two categories: U.S. government securities and derivative contracts.

~~Derivative~~Superfund ~~Contracts.~~Gold, ~~Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or over-the-counter (“OTC”)~~L. ~~Exchange-traded derivatives typically fall within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not~~P. ~~The~~– ~~Fund~~Series ~~has~~B exposure to exchange-traded derivative contracts through the Fund’s trading of exchange-traded futures contracts. The Fund’s exchange-traded futures contract positions are valued daily at settlement prices published by the applicable exchanges. In such cases, provided they are deemed to be actively traded, exchange-traded derivatives are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Less actively traded exchange-traded derivatives fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to models, model calibration to market-clearing transactions, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Where models are used, the selection of a particular model to value an OTC derivative depends upon the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent in, the instrument as well as the availability of pricing information in the market. For OTC derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards and swaps, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. The OTC derivatives held by the Fund may include forwards and swaps. Spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund are valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes. The Fund’s forward positions are typically classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.


	Balance December 31, 2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Futures contracts purchased	$	179,710	$	179,710	$	—	$	—
Futures contracts sold		158,268		158,268		—		—

Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	337,978	$	337,978	$	—	$	—

LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	4	$	—	$	4	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		243,421		243,421		—		—
Futures contracts sold		79,699		79,699		—		—

Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	323,124	$	323,120	$	4	$	—

~~Certain~~The ~~OTC~~following ~~derivatives~~table ~~traded~~summarizes ~~in less liquid markets with limited pricing information, and~~ the ~~determination~~valuation of ~~fair value for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. Such instruments are classified within level 3 of~~ the ~~fair value hierarchy. Where the~~ Fund’s ~~does~~assets ~~not have corroborating market evidence to support significant model inputs~~ and ~~cannot~~liabilities ~~verify~~by the ~~model~~ASC to820 ~~market~~fair value ~~transactions,~~hierarchy ~~transaction price is initially used~~ as ~~the best estimate~~ of ~~fair value. Accordingly~~December 31, ~~when~~2012: a

49Superfund Gold, L.P.


	Balance December 31, 2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	182,189	$	—	$	182,189	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		30,068		30,068		—
Futures contracts sold		155,131		155,131		—		—

Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	367,388	$	185,199	$	182,189	$	—

LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	101,789	$	—	$	101,789	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		89,610		89,610		—		—

Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	191,399	$	89,610	$	101,789	$	—

~~pricing~~Superfund ~~model is used to value such an instrument~~Gold, ~~the model is adjusted so that the model value at inception equals the transaction price~~L. ~~The valuations of these less liquid OTC derivatives are typically based on level 1 and/or level 2 inputs that can be observed in the market, as well as unobservable level 3 inputs~~P. ~~Subsequent~~– toSeries ~~initial~~A recognition, the Fund updates the level 1 and level 2 inputs to reflect observable market changes, with resulting gains and losses reflected within level 3. Level 3 inputs are only changed when corroborated by evidence such as similar market transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or dealer quotations, or other empirical market data. In circumstances where the Fund cannot verify the model value to market transactions, it is possible that a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. The Fund attempts to avoid holding less liquid OTC derivatives. However, once held, the market for any particular derivative contract could become less liquid during the holding period.

As of and during the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Fund held no investments or derivative contracts valued using level 3 inputs.


	Balance December 31, 2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	111,557	$	—	$	111,557	$	—
Futures contracts sold		85,248		85,248		—		—

Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	196,805	$	85,248	$	111,557	$	—

LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	60,610	$	—	$	60,610	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		89,610		89,610		—		—

Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	150,220	$	89,610	$	60,610	$	—

~~The~~43 ~~following table summarizes the valuation of the Fund’s assets and liabilities by the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2012:~~

	BalanceDecember 31,2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	182,189	$	—	$	182,189	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		30,068		30,068		—		—
Futures contracts sold		155,131		155,131		—		—
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	367,388	$	185,199	$	182,189	$	—
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	101,789	$	—	$	101,789	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		89,610		89,610		—		—
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	191,399	$	89,610	$	101,789	$	—

Superfund Gold, L.P. – Series B

Superfund Gold, L.P. – Series A


	Balance December 31, 2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	70,632	$	—	$	70,632	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		30,068		30,068		—
Futures contracts sold		69,883		69,883		—		—

Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	170,583	$	99,951	$	70,632	$	—

LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	41,179	$	—	$	41,179	$	—

Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	41,179	$	—	$	41,179	$	—

	BalanceDecember 31,2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	111,557	$	—	$	111,557	$	—
Futures contracts sold		85,248		85,248		—		—
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	196,805	$	85,248	$	111,557	$	—
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	60,610	$	—	$	60,610	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		89,610		89,610		—		—
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	150,220	$	89,610	$	60,610	$	—

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 assets and liabilities.

~~Superfund~~(3) ~~Gold,~~Disclosure ~~L.P.~~of –derivative ~~Series~~instruments Band hedging activities

	BalanceDecember 31,2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	70,632	$	—	$	70,632	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		30,068		30,068		—		—
Futures contracts sold		69,883		69,883		—		—
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	170,583	$	99,951	$	70,632	$	—
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	41,179	$	—	$	41,179	$	—
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	41,179	$	—	$	41,179	$	—

The Fund follows ASC 815, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“ASC 815”). ASC 815 is intended to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments by requiring enhanced disclosure that enables investors to understand how and why an entity uses derivatives, how derivatives are accounted for, and how derivative instruments affect an entity’s results of operations and financial position.

50Derivative instruments held by the Fund do not qualify as derivative instruments held as hedging instruments, as defined in ASC 815. Instead, the Fund includes derivative instruments in its trading activity. Per the requirements of ASC 815, the Fund discloses the gains and losses on its trading activities for both derivative and nonderivative instruments in the Statement of Operations for each Series.

~~Table~~The Fund engages in the speculative trading of forward ~~Contents~~contracts in currency and futures contracts in a wide range of commodities, including equity markets, interest rates, food and fiber, energy, livestock and metals. ASC 815 requires entities to recognize all derivatives instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. Investments in forward contracts and commodity futures contracts are recorded in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as “unrealized appreciation or depreciation on open forward contracts and futures contracts purchased and futures contracts sold.” Since the derivatives held or sold by the Fund are for speculative trading purposes, the derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under the provisions of ASC 815. Accordingly, all realized gains and losses, as well as any change in net unrealized gains or losses on open positions from the preceding period, are recognized as part of the Fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the Statements of Operations.

~~The~~Superfund ~~following~~Capital ~~table~~Management ~~summarizes~~believes futures and forward unrealized gains and losses expressed as a percentage of net assets is indicative of trading activity. Information concerning the ~~valuation~~fair value of the Fund’s ~~assets~~derivatives ~~and~~held ~~liabilities~~long ~~by the~~or ~~ASC~~sold ~~820~~short, ~~fair~~as ~~value~~well ~~hierarchy~~ as information related to the annual average volume of ~~December 31~~the Fund’s derivative activity, ~~2011~~is as follows:

~~Superfund~~44 ~~Gold, L.P.~~

	BalanceDecember 31,2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
U.S. Government securities	$	6,400,000	$	—	$	6,400,000	$	—
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		134,988		—		134,988		—
Futures contracts sold		378,483		378,483		—		—
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	6,913,471	$	378,483	$	6,534,988	$	—
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	95,397	$	—	$	95,397	$	—
Futures contracts sold		2,237,362		2,237,362		—		—
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	2,332,759	$	2,237,362	$	95,397	$	—

Superfund Gold, L.P. ~~– Series A~~

	BalanceDecember 31,2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
U.S. Government securities	$	3,700,000	$	—	$	3,700,000	$	—
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		69,300		—		69,300		—
Futures contracts sold		189,971		189,971		—		—
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	3,959,271	$	189,971	$	3,769,300	$	—
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	51,238	$	—	$	51,238	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		1,411,823		1,411,823		—		—
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	1,463,061	$	1,411,823	$	51,238	$	—

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2013, is as follows:

Superfund Gold, L.P. – Series B


Type of Instrument	Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location	Asset Derivatives at December 31, 2013		Liability Derivatives at December 31, 2013			Net
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	3	$	—		$	3
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		—		(5	)		(5	)
Futures contracts	Futures contracts purchased		434,347		(623,378	)		(189,031	)
Futures contracts	Futures contracts sold		336,188		(190,551	)		145,637

Totals		$	770,538	$	(813,934	)	$	(43,396	)

	BalanceDecember 31,2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
U.S. Government securities	$	2,700,000	$	—	$	2,700,000	$	—
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		65,688		—		65,688		—
Futures contracts sold		188,512		188,512		—		—
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value	$	2,954,200	$	188,512	$	2,765,688	$	—
LIABILITIES
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	44,159	$	—	$	44,159	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		825,539		825,539		—		—
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value	$	869,698	$	825,539	$	44,159	$	—

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2012, is as follows:

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 assets and liabilities.


Type of Instrument	Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location	Asset Derivatives at December 31, 2012		Liability Derivatives at December 31, 2012			Net
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	182,189	$	—		$	182,189
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		—		(101,789	)		(101,789	)
Futures contracts	Futures contracts purchased		30,068		(89,610	)		(59,542	)
Futures contracts	Futures contracts sold		155,131		—			155,131

Totals		$	367,388	$	(191,399	)	$	175,989

51Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2013:


Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815	Location of Loss on Derivatives Recognized in Income	Net Realized Loss on Derivatives Recognized in Income			Net Change in Unrealized Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized in Income
Foreign exchange contracts	Net realized/unrealized loss on futures and forward contracts	$	(328,276	)	$	(80,402	)
Futures contracts	Net realized/unrealized loss on futures and forward contracts		(2,213,769	)		(138,983	)

Total		$	(2,542,045	)	$	(219,385	)

~~(3)~~45 ~~Disclosure of derivative instruments and hedging activities~~

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

~~Derivative~~Effects instruments held by the Fund do not qualify as derivative instruments held as hedging instruments, as defined in ASC 815. Instead, the Fund includes derivative instruments in its trading activity. Per the requirements of ~~ASC~~Derivative ~~815,~~Instruments ~~the Fund discloses the gains and losses~~ on ~~its trading activities for both derivative and nonderivative instruments in~~ the Statement of Operations for ~~each~~the ~~Series.~~Year Ended December 31, 2012:

The Fund engages in the speculative trading of forward contracts in currency and futures contracts in a wide range of commodities, including equity markets, interest rates, food and fiber, energy, livestock and metals. ASC 815 requires entities to recognize all derivatives instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. Investments in forward contracts and commodity futures contracts are recorded in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as “unrealized appreciation or depreciation on open forward contracts and futures contracts purchased and futures contracts sold.” Since the derivatives held or sold by the Fund are for speculative trading purposes, the derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under the provisions of ASC 815. Accordingly, all realized gains and losses, as well as any change in net unrealized gains or losses on open positions from the preceding period, are recognized as part of the Fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the Statements of Operations.


Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815	Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income	Net Realized Gain(Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income			Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation on Derivatives Recognized in Income
Foreign exchange contracts	Net realized/unrealized gain on futures and forward contracts	$	263,199		$	40,809
Futures contracts	Net realized/unrealized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts		(1,896,707	)		1,954,468

Total		$	(1,633,508	)	$	1,995,277

Superfund ~~Capital~~Gold, ~~Management believes~~L.P. ~~futures~~gross and ~~forward trading activity expressed as a percentage of~~ net ~~assets~~unrealized isgains ~~indicative~~and oflosses ~~trading~~by ~~activity. Information concerning the fair value of the Fund’s derivatives held~~ long orand ~~sold~~ short, aspositions ~~well~~ as ~~information related to the annual average volume~~ of ~~the~~December 31, ~~Fund’s~~2013 ~~derivative activity~~and December 31, ~~is as follows~~2012:

Superfund Gold, L.P.


	As of December 31, 2013
	Long Positions Gross Unrealized											Short Positions Gross Unrealized
	Gains		% of Net Assets			Losses			% of Net Assets			Gains		% of Net Assets			Losses			% of Net Assets			Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Positions
Foreign Exchange	$	3		0.0	*	$	—			—		$	—		—		$	(5	)		(0.0	)*	$	(2	)
Currency		34,356		0.3			(13,987	)		(0.1	)		67,051		0.5			(3,916	)		(0.0	)*		83,504
Financial		—		—			(11,330	)		(0.1	)		115,315		0.9			(11,094	)		(0.1	)		92,891
Food & Fiber		4,780		0.0	*		(35,294	)		(0.3	)		61,459		0.5			—			—			30,945
Indices		226,092		1.8			(13,372	)		(0.1	)		168		0.0	*		(11,208	)		(0.1	)		201,680
Metals		113,479		0.9			(424,270	)		(3.3	)		92,195		0.7			(164,333	)		(1.3	)		(382,929	)
Energy		55,539		0.4			(120,204	)		(0.9	)		—		—			—			—			(64,665	)
Livestock		100		0.0	*		(4,920	)		(0.0	)*		—		—			—			—			(4,820	)

Totals	$	434,349		3.4		$	(623,377	)		(4.9	)	$	336,188		2.7		$	(190,556	)		(1.5	)	$	(43,396	)

~~The~~* ~~fair~~Due ~~value~~to ~~of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2012, is as follows:~~ rounding

Type of Instrument	Statement of Assets andLiabilities Location		Asset Derivatives atDecember 31, 2012				Liability Derivatives atDecember 31, 2012				Net
	As of December 31, 2012
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized appreciationon open forwardcontracts		$	182,189			$	—			$	182,189
	Long Positions Gross Unrealized															Short Positions Gross Unrealized
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized depreciationon open forwardcontracts			—				(101,789	)			(101,789	)
	Gains				% ofNetAssets				Losses				% ofNetAssets			Gains		% ofNetAssets			Losses			% ofNetAssets			Net UnrealizedGain (Loss) onOpen Positions
Futures contracts	Futures contractspurchased			30,068				(89,610	)			(59,542	)
Foreign Exchange	$	181,362				0.8			$	(16,748	)			(0.1	)	$	827		0.0	*	$	(85,041	)		(0.4	)	$	80,400
Futures contracts	Futures contracts sold			155,131				—				155,131
Currency		80,981				0.4				(91,145	)			(0.4	)		260,503		1.2			(2,294	)		(0.0	)*		248,045
Totals			$	367,388			$	(191,399	)		$	175,989
Financial		172,165				0.8				(15,042	)			(0.1	)		1,613		0.0	*		—			—			158,736
Food & Fiber		—				—				—				—			123,461		0.5			(3,116	)		(0.0	)*		120,345
Indices		365,180				1.6				(95,225	)			(0.4	)		—		—			(504	)		(0.0	)*		269,451
Metals		88,702				0.4				(658,888	)			(2.9	)		226,985		1.0			(448,613	)		(2.0	)		(791,814	)
Energy		94,444				0.4				(714	)			(0.0	)*		194,796		0.9			(197,700	)		(0.9	)		90,826
Totals	$	982,834				4.4			$	(877,762	)			(3.9	)	$	808,185		3.6		$	(737,268	)		(3.3	)	$	175,989

Type of Instrument	Statement of Assets andLiabilities Location	Asset Derivatives atDecember 31, 2011		Liability Derivatives atDecember 31, 2011			Net
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized appreciationon open forwardcontracts	$	134,988	$	—		$	134,988
Foreign exchange contracts	Unrealized depreciationon open forwardcontracts		—		(95,397	)		(95,397	)
Futures contracts	Futures contractspurchased		—		(2,237,362	)		(2,237,362	)
Futures contracts	Futures contracts sold		378,483		—			378,483
Totals		$	513,471	$	(2,332,759	)	$	(1,819,288	)

Superfund Gold, L.P. average* contract volume by market sector for the Year Ended December 31, 2013:


	Average Number of Long Contracts		Average Number of Short Contracts		Average Value of Long Positions		Average Value of Short Positions
Foreign Exchange		47		34	$	23	$	58


	Average Number of Long Contracts		Average Number of Short Contracts
Currency		389		201
Financial		1,448		785
Food & Fiber		83		163
Indices		1,274		103
Metals		716		347
Livestock		66		23
Energy		303		190

Total		4,326		1,846

~~Effects~~46 ~~of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012:~~

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815	Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income	Net Realized Gain (Loss)on Derivatives Recognizedin Income			Net Change inUnrealized Appreciationon DerivativesRecognized in Income
Foreign exchange contracts	Net realized and unrealized gain on futures and forward contracts	$	263,199		$	40,809
Futures contracts	Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts		(1,896,707	)		1,954,468
Total		$	(1,633,508	)	$	1,995,277

~~Effects~~Superfund ofGold, ~~Derivative~~L.P. ~~Instruments~~average* oncontract ~~the~~volume ~~Statement~~by ofmarket ~~Operations~~sector for the Year Ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012:

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815	Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income		Net Realized Gain (Loss)on Derivatives Recognizedin Income				Net Change inUnrealized Depreciationon DerivativesRecognized in Income
	Average Numberof Long Contracts				Average Numberof Short Contracts				Average Value ofLong Positions		Average Value ofShort Positions
Foreign exchange contracts	Net realized and unrealized loss on futures and forward contracts		$	(119,549	)		$	(148,534	)
Foreign Exchange		93				85			$	495,922	$	495,459
Futures contracts	Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts			5,708,315				(4,341,995	)
Total			$	5,588,766			$	(4,490,529	)

Superfund Gold, L.P. gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2012:


	Average Number of Long Contracts		Average Number of Short Contracts
Currency		826		930
Financial		2,395		552
Food & Fiber		88		182
Indices		1,087		664
Metals		771		240
Livestock		31		110
Energy		385		368

Total		5,676		3,131

	As of December 31, 2012
	Long Positions Gross Unrealized										Short Positions Gross Unrealized
	Gains		% ofNetAssets		Losses			% ofNetAssets			Gains		% ofNetAssets			Losses			% ofNetAssets			Net UnrealizedGains (Losses) onOpen Positions
Foreign Exchange	$	181,362		0.8	$	(16,748	)		(0.1	)	$	827		0.0	*	$	(85,041	)		(0.4	)	$	80,400
Currency		80,981		0.4		(91,145	)		(0.4	)		260,503		1.2			(2,294	)		(0.0	)*		248,045
Financial		172,165		0.8		(15,042	)		(0.1	)		1,613		0.0	*		—			—			158,736
Food & Fiber		—		—		—			—			123,461		0.6			(3,116	)		(0.0	)*		120,345
Indices		365,180		1.6		(95,225	)		(0.4	)		—		—			(504	)		(0.0	)*		269,451
Metals		88,702		0.4		(658,888	)		(2.9	)		226,985		1.0			(448,613	)		(2.0	)		(791,814	)
Energy		94,444		0.4		(714	)		(0.0	)*		194,796		0.9			(197,700	)		(0.9	)		90,826
Totals	$	982,834		4.4	$	(877,762	)		(3.9	)	$	808,185		3.6		$	(737,268	)		(3.3	)	$	175,989

*	Based on quarterly holdings

*Superfund ~~Due~~Gold, toL.P. ~~rounding~~trading results by market sector:


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
	Net Realized Gains (Losses)			Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Net Trading Gains (Losses)
Foreign Exchange	$	(328,276	)	$	(80,402	)	$	(408,678	)
Currency		(448,607	)		(164,541	)		(613,148	)
Financial		644,407			(65,845	)		578,562
Food & Fiber		(488,863	)		(89,400	)		(578,263	)
Indices		2,340,038			(67,771	)		2,272,267
Metals		(3,893,370	)		408,885			(3,484,485	)
Livestock		80,430			(4,820	)		75,610
Energy		(447,804	)		(155,491	)		(603,295	)

Total net trading losses	$	(2,542,045	)	$	(219,385	)	$	(2,761,430	)


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Net Realized Gains (Losses)			Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Net Trading Gains (Losses)
Foreign Exchange	$	263,199		$	40,809		$	304,008
Currency		(1,162,365	)		94,280			(1,068,085	)
Financial		639,203			164,793			803,996
Food & Fiber		(737,597	)		66,335			(671,262	)
Indices		26,837			202,387			229,224
Metals		(1,278,198	)		1,352,838			74,640
Livestock		(64,462	)		(18,950	)		(83,412	)
Energy		679,875			92,785			772,660

Filing Compare · SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.