Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012.

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the transition period from to .

Commission file number 0-4538

Cybex International, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


New York		11-1731581
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10 Trotter Drive, Medway, Massachusetts		02053
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

(508) 533-4300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

On ~~August 6~~November 5, 2012, the Registrant had outstanding 17,143,050 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, which is the Registrant’s only class of Common Stock.

CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

		~~Page~~		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss –– Three and Six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 25, 2011		3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) — Three and Nine months ended September 29, 2012 and September 24, 2011			3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets –– June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		4
		Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011			4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows–– Six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 25, 2011		5
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine months ended September 29, 2012 and September 24, 2011			5
	~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6		6
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			17
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		21
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			22
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures		21
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures			22
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings		22
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings			23
	Item 1A. Risk Factors		22
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors			23
	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		22
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			23
	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		22
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities			23
	Item 4. Reserved		22
	Item 4.	Reserved			23
	Item 5. Other Information		22
	Item 5.	Other Information			23
	Item 6. Exhibits		22
	Item 6.	Exhibits			23
Signatures			23		24

CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,2012			June 25,2011			June 30,2012			June 25,2011
	September 29,2012			September 24,2011			September 29,2012			September 24,2011
Net sales	$	3034,~~800~~368		$	3233,~~564~~478		$	68102,~~059~~427		$	6397,~~575~~054
Cost of sales		2122,~~736~~942			21,~~560~~728			4669,~~744~~686			4163,~~325~~053
Gross profit		911,~~064~~426			11,~~004~~750			2132,~~315~~741			2234,~~250~~001
Selling, general and administrative expenses		910,~~930~~154			910,~~952~~404			2131,~~349~~498			2030,~~413~~818
Litigation charge (reduction)		(3068	)		1,~~288~~362			63—			13,~~643~~005
Operating income (loss)		~~(836~~1,340	)		(~~236~~16	)		~~(97~~1,243	)		~~194~~178
Interest expense, net		~~358~~331			~~265~~240			~~615~~946			~~541~~781
Loss before income taxes		(1,194	)		(501	)		(712	)		(347	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		1,009			(256	)		297			(603	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		13(74	)		5422			25(49	)		(~~171~~149	)
Net loss	$	(1,207	)	$	(555	)	$	(737	)	$	(176	)
Net income (loss)	$	1,083		$	(278	)	$	346		$	(454	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	$	0.06		$	(0.02	)	$	0.02		$	(0.03	)
Comprehensive loss:
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss	$	(1,207	)	$	(555	)	$	(737	)	$	(176	)
Net income (loss)	$	1,083		$	(278	)	$	346		$	(454	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		34(57	)		750			(966	)		~~(16~~34	)
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge		~~117~~101			~~(94~~7	)		~~204~~305			4249
Comprehensive loss	$	(1,056	)	$	(642	)	$	(542	)	$	(150	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,127		$	(221	)	$	585		$	(371	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	June 30,2012			December 31,2011
	September 29,2012			December 31,2011
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	32,~~999~~181		$	11,958
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,160 and $1,192		16,837			20,251
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,222 and $1,192		18,620			20,251
Inventories		1314,~~541~~258			13,584
Prepaid expenses and other		1,~~956~~596			2,070
Barnhard litigation related receivable		—			7,561
Total current assets		36,~~333~~655			55,424
Property, plant and equipment, net		27,~~825~~131			28,194
Other assets		~~1,023~~827			1,025
	$	6564,~~181~~613		$	84,643
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	2,061		$	1,520
Accounts payable		45,~~367~~302			5,364
Accrued liabilities		12,~~831~~295			13,674
Barnhard litigation reserve		—			27,004
Total current liabilities		19,~~259~~658			47,562
Long-term debt		2018,~~833~~939			12,769
Other liabilities		5,~~802~~579			4,674
Total liabilities		4544,~~894~~176			65,005
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4 and 12)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $.10 par value, 30,000 shares authorized, 17,877 and 17,860 shares issued		1,788			1,786
Common stock, $.10 par value, 30,000 shares authorized, 17,883 and 17,860 shares issued		1,788			1,786
Additional paid-in capital		69,~~240~~263			69,051
Treasury stock, at cost (740 shares)		(2,955	)		(2,955	)
Accumulated deficit		(4645,~~966~~883	)		(46,229	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,~~820~~776	)		(2,015	)
Total stockholders’ equity		1920,~~287~~437			19,638
	$	6564,~~181~~613		$	84,643

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,2012			June 25,2011
	September 29,2012			September 24,2011
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(737	)	$	(176	)
Net income (loss)	$	346		$	(454	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		23,~~293~~426			23,~~399~~491
Amortization of deferred financing costs		3558			4047
Stock-based compensation		2742			88130
Provision for doubtful accounts		~~192~~213			~~132~~174
Amortization of interest rate swap		(1623	)		(1623	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		31,~~226~~459			~~2,270~~(579	)
Inventories		39(710	)		(2,~~218~~238	)
Prepaid expenses and other		~~(11~~368	)		~~244~~249
Barnhard litigation reserve, net		(18,500	)		13,~~643~~005
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities		(~~1,281~~615	)		(12,~~909~~166	)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(1413,~~733~~936	)		25,~~497~~968
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(12,~~680~~408	)		(1,~~163~~954	)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(12,~~680~~408	)		(1,~~163~~954	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of revolver loan		(910,~~000~~378	)		—
Repayments of term loan		(~~895~~1,411	)		(~~760~~1,140	)
Borrowing under revolver loan		10,378			—
Borrowing under term loan		8,122			—
Deferred financing costs		(151	)		—
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		8,454			(760	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		7			—
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(7,959	)		574
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		6,567			(1,140	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(9,777	)		2,874
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		11,958			7,030
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	32,~~999~~181		$	79,~~604~~904
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE
Cash paid for interest	$	~~574~~888		$	~~548~~816
Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net		5052			(~~158~~105	)
Issuance of warrants to bank		163			—

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Cybex International, Inc. (the “Company” or “Cybex”), a New York corporation, is a manufacturer of exercise equipment and develops, manufactures and markets strength and cardiovascular fitness equipment products for the commercial and, to a lesser extent, consumer markets. Most of the Company’s products are sold under the brand name “Cybex.” The Company operates in one business segment.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a ~~fair~~complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 3029, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

It is recommended that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other information included in the Company’s reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

On October 17, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which all of the Company’s outstanding common stock, exclusive of shares owned by the Company’s largest shareholder, UM Holdings, Ltd. (“UM”), its subsidiaries, and John Aglialoro and Joan Carter, would be converted into $2.55 per share payable in cash, in a “going private” merger transaction. Consummation of the merger is subject to various conditions, including shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement and consummation of financing. See Note 14 for a description of this transaction.

NOTE 2 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in the financial statements. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity, and instead requires ~~consecutive~~ presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income either in a continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The standard also requires that items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income be presented on the face of the financial statements. However, in December 2011, the FASB finalized a proposal to defer the requirement to present reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements and require that ~~reclassification~~ reclassification adjustments be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, consistent with the existing disclosure requirements. The deferral does not change the requirement to present net income, components of other comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income in either one continuous statement or two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance iswas effective for the periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption iswas permitted. The Company adopted ~~these~~ these requirements induring 2011, with retrospective application to all periods presented, except with regard to the requirements to present reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 3 — CONCENTRATION OF RISK AND GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENT DATA

Sales to one customer represented 16% and 15% of consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 13% of consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended June 25, 2011, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer were $1,647,000 and $1,641,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Sales to another customer represented 9% and 11% of consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 8% and 10% of consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended June 25, 2011, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer were $370,000 and $2,252,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales in any of those periods.

~~Sales~~NOTE ~~outside~~3 of— ~~North~~CONCENTRATION ~~America~~OF ~~represented~~RISK ~~32%~~AND ofGEOGRAPHIC ~~consolidated~~SEGMENT ~~net~~DATA sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 34% and 32% of consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended June 25, 2011, respectively. No single country besides the United States accounts for greater than 10% of consolidated net sales.

Sales to one customer represented 15% of consolidated net sales for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and 13% of consolidated net sales for the three and nine months ended September 24, 2011, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer were $1,556,000 and $1,641,000 at September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Sales to another customer represented 12% and 11% of consolidated net sales for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and 8% and 9% of consolidated net sales for the three and nine months ended September 24, 2011, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer were $2,923,000 and $2,252,000 at September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales in any of those periods.

Sales outside of North America represented 32% of consolidated net sales for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and 32% of consolidated net sales for the three and nine months ended September 24, 2011, respectively. No single country besides the United States accounts for greater than 10% of consolidated net sales.

NOTE 4 — ACCOUNTING FOR GUARANTEES

The Company arranges equipment leases and other financings for certain of its customers. While most of these financings are without recourse, in certain cases the Company may offer a guarantee or other recourse provisions. In such situations, the Company ensures that the transaction between the independent leasing company and the end user customer represents a sales-type lease. The Company monitors the payment status of the lessee under these arrangements and provides a ~~contingency~~ reserve in situations when collection of the lease payments is not probable. At ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, the maximum contingent liability under all recourse and guarantee provisions was approximately $2,~~639~~023,000. A reserve for estimated losses under recourse provisions of $~~165~~126,000 and $203,000 has been recorded based on historical experience, and is included in accrued liabilities at ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The Company as guarantor will recognize, at the inception of certain guarantees, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing such guarantees. The Company has recorded a net liability of $1816,000 and $27,000 at ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, for the estimated fair value of the Company’s guarantees. The fair value of the guarantees is determined based on the estimated cost for a customer to obtain a letter of credit from a bank or similar institution. This liability is reduced on a straight-line basis over the term of each respective guarantee. In most cases, if the Company is required to fulfill its obligations under the guarantee, it has the right to repossess the equipment from the customer. It is not practicable to estimate the approximate amount of proceeds that would be generated from the sale of these assets in such situations.

Additionally, the Company provides a warranty on its products for labor of one to three years and for parts ranging from one to ten years depending on the part and type of equipment. The accrued warranty obligation is provided at the time of product sale based on management estimates which are developed from historical information and certain assumptions about future events, which are subject to change.

The following table sets forth the change in the reserve for product warranties during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012:

Balance as of January 1, 2012	$	4,228,000
Payments made under product warranties		(23,~~207~~096,000	)
Accrual for product warranties issued		34,~~098~~110,000
Balance as of June 30, 2012	$	5,119,000
Balance as of September 29, 2012	$	5,242,000

NOTE 5 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company records stock-based compensation to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments, with such cost recognized over the period that the employee is required to perform services in exchange for the award. The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award based on the grant date fair value of the award.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $14,000 consisting of expenses related to stock options ($10,000) and stock issued to directors ($4,000). For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $27,000, consisting of expenses related to stock options ($20,000) and stock issued to directors ($7,000). For the three months ended June 25, 2011, the Company recorded stock-based

~~compensation~~NOTE ~~expense~~5 of— ~~$44,000, consisting of expenses related to stock options ($41,000) and stock issued to directors ($3,000). For the six months ended June 25, 2011, the Company recorded stock~~STOCK-~~based~~BASED ~~compensation~~COMPENSATION ~~expense of $88,000, consisting of expenses related to stock options ($83,000) and stock issued to directors ($5,000).~~

For the three months ended September 29, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $15,000 consisting of expenses related to stock options ($10,000) and stock issued to directors ($5,000). For the nine months ended September 29, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $42,000, consisting of expenses related to stock options ($30,000) and stock issued to directors ($12,000). For the three months ended September 24, 2011, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $42,000, consisting of expenses related to stock options ($39,000) and stock issued to directors ($3,000). For the nine months ended September 24, 2011, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $130,000, consisting of expenses related to stock options ($122,000) and stock issued to directors ($8,000).

Cybex’s 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) is designed to provide incentives that will attract and retain individuals key to the success of the Company through direct or indirect ownership of the Company’s common stock. The Omnibus Plan provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards and bonus stock purchase awards. The Company reserved 1,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. A registration statement was filed for the Omnibus Plan and the Company provides newly-issued shares of registered common stock upon the exercise of options and upon stock grants under the Omnibus Plan.

The terms and conditions of each award are determined by a committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. Under the Omnibus Plan, the committee may grant either qualified or nonqualified stock options with a term not to exceed ten years from the grant date and at an exercise price per share that the committee may determine (which in the case of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant). The options generally vest over a three to five year period (with some cliff vesting).

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans as of ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 is presented below:

	Number ofShares			WeightedAverage ExercisePrice		RemainingContractualTerm (years)			IntrinsicValue		~~IntrinsicValue~~
Outstanding at January 1, 2012		633,125		$	2.34
Granted		—			—
Exercised		—(6,000	)		1.20
Cancelled/Forfeited		(1316,000	)		12.7307
Outstanding at June 30, 2012		620,125		$	2.36			4.56			$	168,000
Outstanding at September 29, 2012		611,125		$	2.36		4.32		$	92,000
Options exercisable at June 30, 2012		519,125		$	2.58			3.99			$	125,000
Options exercisable at September 29, 2012		510,125		$	2.59		3.75		$	66,000
Options vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2012		615,718		$	2.36			4.54			$	166,000
Options vested and expected to vest at September 29, 2012		607,452		$	2.37		4.31		$	91,000

NoThe ~~options~~intrinsic ~~were~~value of options exercised ~~for~~in the three months ended September 29, 2012 and ~~six~~September 24, 2011 was $1,000 and $0, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised in the nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 and ~~June~~September 2524, 2011 was $1,000 and $0, respectively.

As of ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, there was $9478,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8668 years.

At ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, there are ~~611~~613,000 shares available for future issuance pursuant to the 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

NOTE 6 — INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30,2012		December 31,2011
Raw materials	$	7,388,000	$	7,853,000
Work in process		3,323,000		3,160,000
Finished goods		2,830,000		2,571,000
	$	13,541,000	$	13,584,000

NOTE 6 — INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following:


	September 29, 2012		December 31, 2011
Raw materials	$	8,545,000	$	7,853,000
Work in process		3,257,000		3,160,000
Finished goods		2,456,000		2,571,000

	$	14,258,000	$	13,584,000

NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	June 30,2012			December 31,2011
	September 29,2012			December 31,2011
Citizens revolving credit loan	$	~~1,378,000~~—		$	—
Citizens real estate loans		18,~~430~~164,000			10,703,000
Citizens equipment facility		32,~~086~~836,000			3,586,000
		22,894,000			14,289,000
		21,000,000			14,289,000
Less – current portion		(2,061,000	)		(1,520,000	)
	$	2018,~~833~~939,000		$	12,769,000

In June 2007, a $13,000,000 mortgage loan was advanced to the Company pursuant to the loan agreement (the “Citizens Loan Agreement”) with RBS Citizens, National Association (“Citizens”). The proceeds of this loan were used to finance a portion of the acquisition of an approximate 340,000 square foot manufacturing, office and warehouse facility located in Owatonna, Minnesota. The principal of the Owatonna real estate loan is being retired by eighty-three equal monthly payments of $43,000 along with a balloon payment of $9,403,000 at July 2, 2014.

In July 2008, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Citizens Credit Agreement”) with Citizens, providing for a revolving line of credit of up to the lesser of a ceiling or an amount determined by reference to a borrowing base composed of designated percentages of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory.

In March 2012, the Citizens Credit Agreement and Loan Agreement were amended to among other things increase the ceiling of the revolving line of credit under the Credit Agreement to $18,000,000 and provide under the Loan Agreement an additional $8,122,000 mortgage loan on the Company’s Medway facility. This additional borrowing capacity was used in part to finance a portion of the March 2012 settlement payments in the Barnhard product liability suit (see Note 12). The principal of the Medway real estate loan is being retired by sixty equal monthly payments of $45,000 along with a balloon payment of $5,415,000 at March 15, 2017.

Availability under the revolving loan fluctuates daily based on the borrowing base, and is reduced by outstanding advances and letters of credit. At ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, the net availability under the revolving line of credit was $1416,~~730~~869,000. The Citizens revolving line of credit is available to July 2, 2013.

In June 2010, the Company entered into a Master Lease Agreement (the “Citizens Equipment Facility”) with an affiliate of Citizens, RBS Asset Finance, Inc. (referred to herein as “Citizens”), pursuant to which $4,999,000 of equipment lease financing was advanced. Proceeds of the advance were used to retire in full equipment term loans from Wells Fargo Bank, NA (“Wells Fargo”) and related obligations. The Citizens Equipment Facility is being retired by 60 equal monthly payments of fixed rent plus interest. While the documentation for this transaction is structured as a lease, the advances under the facility are treated for all purposes as a loan.

The Citizens real estate loans and revolving line of credit are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. Amounts outstanding under the Citizens Equipment Facility are secured by designated equipment owned by the Company and cross-collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable and inventory.

The Citizens revolving line of credit and Owatonna real estate loan bore interest from June 30, 2009 to March 15, 2012 at LIBOR plus 2.5% to 3.0% based on a performance grid. From March 15, 2012, the Citizens Owatonna and Medway real estate loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% and the Citizens revolving line of credit bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% to 3.75% based on a performance grid. The Citizens Equipment Facility bears interest at a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3%. LIBOR was .25% at June 30, 2012.

~~There~~The ~~were~~Citizens noreal ~~revolving~~estate loans ~~outstanding~~and ~~during~~revolving ~~the~~line ~~six~~of ~~months~~credit ~~ended~~are ~~June 25,~~secured ~~2011.~~by ~~The~~substantially ~~average~~all of the Company’s assets. Amounts outstanding ~~revolving~~under ~~loan~~the ~~balance~~Citizens ~~during~~Equipment Facility are secured by designated equipment owned by the ~~six~~Company ~~months~~and ~~ended~~cross-collateralized ~~June 30,~~by ~~2012~~the ~~was~~Company’s ~~$1,422,000~~accounts receivable and inventory.

The ~~Company’s~~Citizens revolving line of credit ~~facilities require~~and ~~the~~Owatonna ~~Company~~real estate loan bore interest from June 30, 2009 to ~~maintain~~March 15, ~~various~~2012 ~~financial~~at ~~covenants~~LIBOR plus 2.5% Atto 3.0% ~~June~~based on a performance grid. From March 3015, 2012, the ~~Company~~Citizens ~~was~~Owatonna inand ~~compliance~~Medway ~~with~~real ~~all~~estate ~~financial~~loans ~~covenants~~bear ~~included~~interest ~~within~~at LIBOR plus 2.5% and the Citizens revolving line of credit ~~facilities~~bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% ~~While~~to ~~there~~3.75% ~~can~~based beon noa performance ~~assurance,~~grid. ~~the~~The ~~Company~~Citizens ~~believes~~Equipment ~~that~~Facility itbears ~~will remain~~interest inat ~~compliance~~a ~~with~~floating ~~its~~rate ~~financing~~equal ~~agreements~~to ~~during~~LIBOR ~~the~~plus ~~next~~3%. ~~twelve~~LIBOR ~~months~~was .21% at September 29, 2012.

There were no revolving loans outstanding during the nine months ended September 24, 2011. The ~~Company’s~~average ~~credit~~outstanding ~~agreements~~revolving ~~contain~~loan ~~cross~~balance ~~default provisions~~during tothe ~~each~~nine ~~other~~months ended September 29, 2012 was $1,087,000.

The Company’s credit facilities require the Company to maintain various financial covenants. At ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, ~~long-term~~the Company ~~debt~~was ~~maturities~~in ~~are~~compliance aswith ~~follows:~~all financial covenants included within the credit facilities. While there can be no assurance, the Company believes that it will remain in compliance with its financing agreements during at least the next twelve months.

Remainder of 2012	$	1,031,000
2013		3,439,000
2014		11,205,000
2015		1,128,000
2016		541,000
Thereafter		5,550,000
	$	22,894,000

The Company’s various credit agreements contain cross default provisions.

At September 29, 2012 long-term debt maturities are as follows:


Remainder of 2012	$	515,000
2013		2,061,000
2014		11,205,000
2015		1,128,000
2016		541,000
Thereafter		5,550,000

	$	21,000,000

NOTE 8 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in interest rates. The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

Interest rate swap agreements are utilized to reduce the impact of changes in interest rates on certain debt. These agreements were designated as cash flow hedges, therefore, the unrealized gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

In June 2006, the Company entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement with Citizens which commenced on June 29, 2007 to hedge the LIBOR-based Citizens Owatonna real estate loan. The notional amount of the swap amortizes based on the same amortization schedule as the Citizens Owatonna real estate loan and the hedged item (one-month LIBOR) is the same as the basis for the interest rate on the loan. The swap effectively converts the rate from a floating rate based on LIBOR to a fixed rate which from June 30, 2009 to March 15, 2012 equaled 8.25% or 8.75% based on a performance grid and from March 15, 2012 equals 8.25%. The swap and interest payments on the debt settle monthly. The real estate loan and the swap both mature on July 2, 2014. There was no initial cost of the interest rate swap. The Company designates the interest rate swap as a derivative hedging instrument and, accordingly, changes in the fair value of this swap are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.

The following table presents the fair values of derivatives included within the consolidated balance sheets:

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

Fair Value

June 30,2012

December 31,2011

BalanceSheetLocation

June 30,2012

December 31,2011

BalanceSheetLocation

September 29,2012

December 31,2011

BalanceSheetLocation

September 29,2012

December 31,2011

BalanceSheetLocation

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

Interest rate swap agreement

—

1978,~~088,~~000

1,307,000

~~OtherLiabilities~~Other Liabilities

The following table presents the amounts affecting the consolidated statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 and ~~June~~September 2524, 2011, respectively:

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax

Amount of Gain Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax

Derivatives in

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

June 30,2012

June 25,2011

June 30,2012

June 25,2011

September 29,2012

September 24,2011

September 29,2012

September 24,2011

Interest rate swap agreement

~~117~~101,000

~~(94~~7,000

)

~~204~~305,000

4249,000

Amount of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income

Derivatives in

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

June 30,2012

June 25,2011

June 30,2012

June 25,2011

September 29,2012

September 24,2011

September 29,2012

September 24,2011

Interest rate swap agreement

(~~146~~145,000

)

(~~156~~150,000

)

(~~292~~437,~~000~~500

)

(~~309~~459,000

)

See Note 9 —– Fair Value of Financial Instruments for a description of how the above financial instruments are valued.

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these financial instruments. The counterparties to all derivative transactions are major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings, and although no assurances can be given, the Company does not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet its obligations. The credit exposure related to these financial instruments is represented by the fair value of contracts with a positive fair value at the reporting date. Therefore, the Company had no exposure to its counterparties as of ~~June~~September 3029, 2012.

For the cash flow hedges referred to above, the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss are reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects earnings. ~~The~~Based on current interest rates, the amount expected to be reclassified into pre-tax earnings in the next 12twelve months is $~~250~~227,000. The timing of actual amounts reclassified into earnings is dependent on future movement in interest rates.

NOTE 9 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, long-term debt and derivative instruments. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered to be representative of their respective fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. Based on the terms of the Company’s debt instruments, as amended, that are outstanding as of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, the carrying values are considered to approximate their respective fair values. See Note 7 for the terms and carrying values of the Company’s various debt instruments.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value

~~NOTE~~ on 9a —recurring ~~FAIR~~basis ~~VALUE~~as OFof ~~FINANCIAL~~September 29, ~~INSTRUMENTS~~2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value and is described below:

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, long-term debt and derivative instruments. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered to be representative of their respective fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. Based on the terms of the Company’s debt instruments, as amended, that are outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, the carrying values are considered to approximate their respective fair values. See Note 7 for the terms and carrying values of the Company’s various debt instruments.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value and is described below:

•

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

•

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

•

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. There were no transfers between levels 1, 2, or 3 during 2012 or 2011.

Balance atJune 30,2012

Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets(Level 1)

Significant OtherObservable Inputs(Level 2)

SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)

Balance atSeptember 29,2012

Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets(Level 1)

Significant OtherObservableInputs (Level 2)

SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)

Interest rate swap liability

1978,~~088,~~000

—

1978,~~088,~~000

—

Balance atDecember 31,2011

Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets(Level 1)

Significant ~~OtherObservable~~OtherObservableInputs ~~Inputs~~(Level 2)

SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)

Interest rate swap liability

1,307,000

—

1,307,000

—

The valuation of the interest rate swap agreement is based on quoted prices from the counterparty that values this instrument using proprietary models and market information at the date presented, as well as consideration of the impact of the risk of non-performance of the counterparty and the Company.

There were no non-financial assets or liabilities subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis at ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

NOTE 10 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock:

The Company’s Board has the ability to issue, without approval by the common shareholders, up to 500,000 shares of $1 par value preferred stock having rights and preferences as the Board may determine in its sole discretion.

Common Stock:

At ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, there are 1,~~306~~299,125 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance pursuant to the exercise or issuance of stock options and warrants.

Warrants:

On March 15, 2012, the Company issued to Citizens Bank a warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share in connection with the March 2012 financing described in Note 7. The warrant has a term of ten years. The fair value of the warrant of $163,000 was recorded as a deferred financing cost which is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

Comprehensive Income (Loss):

Comprehensive Income (loss) is the change in equity of a business enterprise from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Excluding net income (loss), the components of comprehensive income (loss) are from foreign currency translation adjustments and changes in the fair value of hedging instruments.

~~The~~12 ~~following summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:~~

	June 30,2012			December 31,2011
Cumulative translation adjustment	$	(1,321,000	)	$	(1,312,000	)
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge (net of tax) (1)		(499,000	)		(703,000	)
Total	$	(1,820,000	)	$	(2,015,000	)

(1) Net of deferred income tax asset of $382,000 and $458,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, which are reserved by a valuation allowance at the end of each period.

NOTE 11 — NET LOSS PER SHARE

The table below sets forth the reconciliation of the basic and diluted net loss per share computations:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,2012		June 25,2011		June 30,2012		June 25,2011
Shares used in computing basic net loss per share		17,128,000		17,120,000		17,124,000		17,120,000
Dilutive effect of options and warrants		—		—		—		—
Shares used in computing diluted net loss per share		17,128,000		17,120,000		17,124,000		17,120,000

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, options to purchase 620,125 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.17 to $7.37 per share and warrants to purchase 75,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.10 per share were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as the result would be anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 25, 2011, options to purchase 694,875 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.17 to $7.37 per share were outstanding but were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share as the result would be anti-dilutive.

The following summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
Cumulative translation adjustment	$	(1,378,000	)	$	(1,312,000	)
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge (net of tax) (1)		(398,000	)		(703,000	)

Total	$	(1,776,000	)	$	(2,015,000	)

(1)	Net of deferred income tax asset of $344,000 and $458,000 at September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, which are reserved by a valuation allowance at the end of each period.

NOTE 11 — NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The table below sets forth the reconciliation of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share computations:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012		September 24, 2011		September 29, 2012		September 24, 2011
Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share		17,141,000		17,120,000		17,130,000		17,120,000
Dilutive effect of options and warrants		95,000		—		119,000		—

Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share		17,236,000		17,120,000		17,249,000		17,120,000

For the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, options and warrants to purchase 221,000 and 193,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.51 to $7.37 per share and $1.81 - $7.37 per share, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share as the result would be anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 24, 2011, options to purchase 679,875 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.17 to $7.37 per share were outstanding but were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share as the result would be anti-dilutive.

NOTE 12 — CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

Barnhard v. Cybex International, Inc., et al.

This product liability litigation was commenced in 2005 in the Supreme Court, Eighth District, State of New York. The plaintiff, who was rendered a quadriplegic after she pulled a Cybex weight machine over onto herself, asserted that Cybex was at fault for the accident due to the design of the machine and a failure to warn. On December 7, 2010, the jury returned a $66 million verdict, apportioned 75% to Cybex, 20% to third party defendant Amherst Orthopedic Physical Therapy, P.C. and 5% to the plaintiff.

In April 2011, a judgment was entered for $63,075,000 against Cybex. Under New York law, Cybex was responsible for payment of the judgment but could seek reimbursement from the third party defendant of approximately 21% of its payments on the judgment. The Company filed an appeal of the judgment with the Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, and in May 2011, the Appellate Division granted the Company’s motion for a stay of enforcement of the Barnhard judgment during the pendency of the Company’s appeals, subject to the posting of $10,000,000 of collateral. In November 2011, the Appellate Division reduced the judgment to approximately $44 million and otherwise affirmed the judgment.

In13 February 2012, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. Pursuant to this settlement, Cybex in March 2012 paid to the plaintiff $18,500,000 and agreed to pay an additional sum of approximately $1,000,000 over seven years, the parties provided cross-releases of all claims, and a satisfaction of judgment has been recorded. The Company recorded a reduction of the related litigation charge in the fourth quarter of 2011 to reflect the settlement of the litigation. At June 30, 2012, the net present value of the future amounts payable to the plaintiff is $849,000, of which $144,000 is included in accrued liabilities and $705,000 is included in other long-term liabilities.

Company’s motion for a stay of enforcement of the Barnhard judgment during the pendency of the Company’s appeals, subject to the posting of $10,000,000 of collateral. In November 2011, the Appellate Division reduced the judgment to approximately $44 million and otherwise affirmed the judgment.

In February 2012, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. Pursuant to this settlement, Cybex in March 2012 paid to the plaintiff $18,500,000 and agreed to pay an additional sum of approximately $1,000,000 over seven years, the parties provided cross-releases of all claims, and a satisfaction of judgment has been recorded. The Company recorded a reduction of the related litigation charge in the fourth quarter of 2011 to reflect the settlement of the litigation. At September 29, 2012, the net present value of the future amounts payable to the plaintiff is $817,000, of which $144,000 is included in accrued liabilities and $673,000 is included in other long-term liabilities.

United Leasing, Inc. v. Cybex International, Inc., et al.

The Company on February 25, 2009 was served with an Amended Complaint which added the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cybex Capital Corp. (collectively with the Company referred to herein as Cybex), as additional defendants in this action originally venued in the Circuit Court for Williamson County, State of Tennessee. The plaintiff, United Leasing, Inc., provided a series of lease financings for the sale of Cybex equipment to a purchaser/lessee which has since entered bankruptcy, many of which sales were made by an independent dealer, also a defendant in the action. The plaintiff alleged that it was induced to finance in excess of the purchase price for certain of the equipment based primarily upon alleged rebates to the purchaser/lessee made by the independent dealer. Cybex Capital assisted in the lease financing and the plaintiff asserted that Cybex participated in the alleged scheme and was liable for any resulting damages. During March 2009, this action was removed to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

In January 2011, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. Pursuant to this settlement, Cybex paid to the plaintiff the sum of $938,000, the parties provided cross-releases of all claims and the litigation has been dismissed with prejudice.

Other

The Company is involved in certain other legal actions, contingencies and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these other matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Legal fees related to those matters are charged to expense as incurred.

Product Liability

As a manufacturer of fitness products, the Company is inherently subject to the hazards and uncertainties of product liability litigation. The Company has maintained, and expects to continue to maintain, product liability insurance, and it includes reserves for self insured retention in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s product liability insurance, which is on a claims made basis, provides an aggregate of $25,000,000 of annual coverage for claims made on or after December 1, 2011, $10,000,000 of annual coverage for claims made on or after December 1, 2008 and before December 1, 2011, and $5,000,000 of annual coverage for claims made prior to December 1, 2008. The amount of coverage for a claim is reduced as payments are made under the policy for that policy year. These policies include a deductible of $250,000 per claim ($100,000 for claims between December 1, 2007 and December 1, 2008), with an annual aggregate deductible of $1,000,000 on claims made on or after December 1, 2008 and $750,000 on claims made prior to December 1, 2008.

~~Product~~ materially ~~Liability~~in excess of the limits of its insurance coverage. In December 2010, a significant jury verdict was rendered in the Barnhard product liability suit discussed above. This matter was settled in 2012 for an amount substantially in excess of the insurance coverage available for this claim, which had been asserted in 2005 at a time during which the annual coverage was $5,000,000.

AsThe aCompany ~~manufacturer~~records ofa ~~fitness~~reserve ~~products,~~for the ~~Company~~self isinsured ~~inherently~~retention ~~subject~~portion toof ~~the~~product ~~hazards~~liability ~~and~~matters ~~uncertainties~~for ofwhich ~~product~~it ~~liability~~is ~~litigation.~~probable ~~The~~that ~~Company~~a loss has ~~maintained,~~been incurred and ~~expects~~the torange ~~continue~~of tothe ~~maintain, product~~loss ~~liability~~can ~~insurance~~be determined, and ita ~~includes~~corresponding ~~reserves~~insurance ~~for~~receivable ~~self~~to ~~insured~~the ~~retention~~extent inthe ~~accrued~~product ~~liabilities~~liability inexposure ~~the~~is ~~consolidated~~recoverable ~~balance~~from ~~sheets.~~the ~~The~~ Company’s ~~product~~insurance ~~liability~~carrier. ~~insurance,~~Excluding ~~which~~the isBarnhard onmatter, athe product liability claims ~~made~~accrual ~~basis,~~is ~~provides~~included anas ~~aggregate~~a component of accrued liabilities ($251,~~000~~785,000 ofand ~~annual~~$1,934,000 ~~coverage~~at ~~for~~September 29, ~~claims~~2012 ~~made~~and ~~on or after~~ December 131, 2011, ~~$10,000,000~~respectively) ofand ~~annual~~other ~~coverage~~long-term ~~for~~liabilities ~~claims~~($169,000 ~~made~~and on$859,000 orat ~~after December~~September 129, ~~2008~~2012 and ~~before~~ December 131, 2011, respectively) and the insurance recoverable is included as a component of other assets ($5169,000 and $859,000 ofat ~~annual~~September 29, ~~coverage~~2012 ~~for~~and ~~claims made prior to~~ December 131, ~~2008~~2011, respectively). ~~The~~In ~~amount~~addition, ofthe ~~coverage~~Company ~~for~~recorded a $27,004,000 ~~claim~~litigation isreserve ~~reduced~~at asDecember 31, ~~payments~~2011, ~~are~~as ~~made~~a ~~under~~current ~~the~~liability ~~policy~~pertaining ~~for~~to ~~that~~the ~~policy~~Barnhard ~~year.~~judgment ~~These~~and ~~policies~~settlement, ~~include~~and a ~~deductible~~corresponding oflitigation arelated ~~$250,000~~receivable ~~per~~of ~~claim (~~$~~100~~7,561,000, ~~for~~representing ~~claims~~the ~~between~~amount ~~December 1,~~recoverable ~~2007~~in the ~~and~~matter ~~December 1,~~from ~~2008),~~the ~~with~~third anparty ~~annual~~defendant ~~aggregate~~and ~~deductible~~under ofthe ~~$1,000,000~~Company’s oninsurance ~~claims~~policies. ~~made~~The onCompany orreviews ~~after~~and ~~December 1,~~adjusts ~~2008~~each ~~and~~product ~~$750,000~~liability onclaim ~~claims~~and ~~made~~corresponding ~~prior~~receivable toon ~~December 1,~~a ~~2008~~quarterly basis.

While the Company believes that its insurance coverage is adequate in light of the risks of product liability claims and awards, the Company may be subject to product liability claims which assert damages materially in excess of the limits of its insurance coverage. In December 2010, a significant jury verdict was rendered in the Barnhard product liability suit discussed above. This matter was settled in 2012 for an amount substantially in excess of the insurance coverage available for this claim, which had been asserted in 2005 at a time during which the annual coverage was $5,000,000.

The Company records a reserve for the self insured retention portion of product liability matters for which it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the range of the loss can be determined, and a corresponding insurance receivable to the extent the product liability exposure is recoverable from the Company’s insurance carrier. Excluding the Barnhard matter, the product liability claims accrual is included as a component of accrued liabilities ($1,760,000 and $1,934,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) and other long-term liabilities ($383,000 and $859,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) and the insurance recoverable is included as a component of other assets ($383,000 and $859,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively). In addition, the Company recorded a $27,004,000 litigation reserve at December 31, 2011, as a current liability pertaining to the Barnhard judgment and settlement, and a corresponding litigation related receivable of $7,561,000, representing the amount recoverable in the matter from the third party defendant and under the Company’s insurance policies. The Company reviews and adjusts each product liability claim and corresponding receivable on a quarterly basis.

NOTE 13 — INCOME TAXES

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 and ~~June~~September 2524, 2011, an income tax ~~expense~~benefit of 3(16.5% ) of ~~loss~~income before taxes and an income tax benefit of (4924.37%) of ~~income~~loss before taxes was recorded, totaling ($2549,000) and ($~~171~~149,000), respectively. The amount of income tax ~~expense~~benefit for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 is comprised of the reduction in the amount of federal and state income taxes paid in the prior year compared to the amount provided, primarily due to timing of expense payments, offset by the amount of state taxes currently payable. During the first quarter of 2011, a refund of federal alternative minimum taxes paid in the prior year of $257,000 was received, which was recorded as a benefit in the current period since it was fully reserved at December 31, 2010. This was offset by state and federal alternative minimum taxes payable of $86108,000 during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2524, 2011.

At December 31, 2011, U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $9,535,000 were available to offset future taxable income and, as of such date, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $6,626,000, which have an unlimited life, federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $539,000, which do not expire, and federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of $490,000, which begin to expire in 2021 and various net operating loss and credit carryforwards for state tax purposes. The U.S. federal operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2021. These amounts do not include the settlement payment in the Barnhard matter (see Note 12) of $18,500,000 that was made in March 2012, which is deductible in 2012.

The Company established a valuation allowance to fully offset net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2010 due to the uncertainty created by the unfavorable Barnhard jury verdict. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded to the extent it cannot be determined that the realization of these assets is more likely than not. Since the March 2012 settlement payment in the Barnhard litigation will increase the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards by $18,500,000, and since the Company incurred cumulative losses during the three year period ended September 29, 2012, it was determined that a valuation allowance against the entire amount of deferred tax assets continues to be appropriate as of September 29, 2012. Therefore, the Company’s net deferred tax assets of $18,256,000 are fully reserved as of September 29, 2012, and the need for this valuation allowance will be assessed in future periods. As of September 29, 2012, approximately $47,000,000 of future taxable income is needed to fully realize the Company’s deferred tax assets. The difference between this figure and the net operating loss carryforwards and credits is primarily cumulative book versus tax differences related to various expenses.

The Company established a valuation allowance to fully offset net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2010 due to the uncertainty created by the unfavorable Barnhard jury verdict. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded to the extent it cannot be determined that the realization of these assets is more likely than not. Since the March 2012 settlement payment in the Barnhard litigation will increase the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards by $18,500,000, and since the Company incurred cumulative losses during the three year period ended June 30, 2012, it was determined that a valuation allowance against the entire amount of deferred tax assets continues to be appropriate as of June 30, 2012. Therefore, the Company’s net deferred tax assets of $18,420,000 are fully reserved as of June 30, 2012, and the need for this valuation allowance will be assessed in future periods. As of June 30, 2012, approximately $47,000,000 of future taxable income is needed to fully realize the Company’s deferred tax assets. The difference between this figure and the net operating loss carryforwards and credits is primarily cumulative book versus tax differences related to various expenses.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the United Kingdom and various state jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, United Kingdom and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007.

The Company has evaluated any uncertain tax positions in its federal income tax return, United Kingdom return and the state tax returns it is currently filing. The Company has also made an evaluation of the potential impact of additional state taxes being assessed by jurisdictions in which the Company does not currently consider itself liable. Based on this analysis, there has been noa ~~change~~decrease ~~during~~of ~~the~~$101,000 ~~period~~ in the balance of unrecognized tax liability for ofthe nine months ended September 29, 2012, which is $~~322~~221,000 as of ~~December~~September 3129, ~~2011~~2012.

NOTE 14 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 17, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which all of the Company’s outstanding common stock, exclusive of shares owned by the Company’s largest shareholder, UM, its subsidiaries, and John Aglialoro and Joan Carter, would be converted into $2.55 per share payable in cash, in a “going private” merger transaction. John Aglialoro is Cybex’s Chairman and CEO and Joan Carter is a director of the Company, and together with UM own approximately 49.4% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

If the merger is approved and consummated, the Company will be solely owned by UM, Mr. Aglialoro and Ms. Carter. As a result, shares of the Company’s common stock will be deregistered under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); the Company will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act; and its shares will no longer trade on any market.

Consummation of the merger is subject to various conditions, including approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of all outstanding shares and a majority of the shares held by the public shareholders, and consummation of financing. While there can be no assurance that the merger will be approved by the shareholders or consummated, the Company anticipates that it will seek approval of the merger at a Special Shareholders Meeting to be held during the first quarter of 2013 and if approval is obtained the transaction will close shortly thereafter.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION

Statements included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may contain forward-looking statements. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the statements made below. These include, but are not limited to, our ability to comply with the terms of our credit facilities, competitive factors, technological and product developments, market demand, economic conditions and the resolution of litigation involving the Company. Further information on these and other factors which could affect our financial results can be found in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Part I thereof, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, this Form 10-Q and the proxy statement dated April 12, 2012.

OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK

We are a New York corporation that develops, manufacturers and markets high performance, professional quality exercise equipment products for the commercial market and, to a lesser extent, the premium segment of the consumer market.

We estimate that commercial sales represent more than 90% of our total net sales. Our financial performance can be affected when, in times of economic uncertainty, our commercial customers, particularly fitness clubs, become cautious in making expansion and other capital investments and reduce their expenditures for items such as the fitness equipment offered by us.

We experienced a sales decline in 2009, with sales stabilizing in 2010. Our net sales for 2011 and the first ~~six~~nine months of 2012 were 14% and 76%, respectively, above net sales for the corresponding prior ~~period~~periods. While we believe that improving economic and industry conditions and our marketing and new product initiatives have been contributing factors to this sales growth, we experienced an approximate 5% decline in net sales in our second quarter of 2012 compared to the 2011 second quarter. It is our belief that the second quarter sales decline reflects current uncertainty in the general economy rather than a longer term trend. However, we cannot be certain of the extent that a reversal of improvement in economic conditions or a prolonged period of uneven sub-par economic growth in the US, Europe or other areas in which we do business would affect our financial performance.

In December 2010, the jury in the Barnhard product liability suit described elsewhere in this Report apportioned a significant amount of liability to us. In February 2012, we entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff. Pursuant to this settlement, we paid to the plaintiff, net of insurance and contribution by the third party defendant, $18,500,000 and agreed to pay an additional sum of approximately $1,000,000 over seven years. To fund a portion of these payments we incurred additional debt from our primary lender.

~~The~~On October 17, ~~foregoing~~2012, ~~statements~~our ~~are~~Board ~~based~~of onDirectors ~~current~~approved ~~expectations.~~an ~~These~~Agreement ~~statements~~and ~~are~~Plan ~~forward-looking~~of ~~and~~Merger ~~actual~~pursuant ~~results~~to ~~may~~which ~~differ~~all ~~materially.~~of Inour ~~particular~~outstanding common stock, exclusive of shares owned by the ~~continued~~Company’s ~~uncertainties~~largest inshareholder, UUM Holdings, Ltd.S. (“UM”), its subsidiaries, and ~~global economic~~John ~~conditions~~Aglialoro and Joan Carter, would be converted into $2.55 per share payable in ~~the~~cash, ~~fitness~~in ~~industry~~a ~~make~~“going itprivate” ~~particularly~~merger ~~difficult~~transaction. toJohn ~~predict~~Aglialoro ~~future~~is ~~events~~our Chairman and ~~may~~CEO ~~preclude~~and usJoan ~~from~~Carter ~~achieving~~is ~~expected~~a ~~results~~director of the Company, and together with UM own approximately 49.4% of our outstanding common stock.

If the merger is approved and consummated, our Company will be solely owned by UM, Mr. Aglialoro and Ms. Carter. As a result, shares of our common stock will be deregistered under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act; and our shares will no longer trade on any market.

Consummation of the merger is subject to various conditions, including approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of all outstanding shares and a majority of the shares

held by the public shareholders, and consummation of financing. While there can be no assurance that the merger will be approved by our shareholders or consummated, we anticipate that we will seek approval of the merger at a Special Shareholders Meeting to be held during the first quarter of 2013 and if approval is obtained the transaction will close shortly thereafter.

The foregoing statements are based on current expectations. These statements are forward-looking and actual results may differ materially. In particular, the continued uncertainties in U.S. and global economic conditions and in the fitness industry make it particularly difficult to predict future events and may preclude us from achieving expected results.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

NET SALES

Our net sales ~~decreased~~increased $1890,~~764,~~000 or 53%, to $3034,~~800~~368,000 for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2012 versus $3233,~~564~~478,000 for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2011. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, net sales increased $45,~~484~~373,000 or 76%, to $68102,~~059~~427,000 from $6397,~~575~~054,000 compared to the same period in 2011. For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2012, sales of cardiovascular products ~~decreased~~increased $~~793~~1,290,000 or 47% to $1718,~~499~~954,000, and parts, ~~sales~~freight ofand ~~strength~~other ~~products~~sales ~~decreased~~increased $1272,~~068,~~000 or 108% to $93,~~560~~826,000, offset by ~~increased~~sales ~~freight,~~of ~~parts~~strength ~~and~~products ~~other~~which ~~sales~~decreased of $97672,000 or 36% to $311,~~741~~588,000 compared to the same period in 2011. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, sales of cardiovascular products increased $34,~~458~~748,000 or 109%, to $3857,~~382~~336,000 and ~~freight~~parts, ~~parts~~freight and other sales increased $1,~~418~~689,000 or 2016%, to $812,~~416~~242,000, offset by decreases in sales of strength product of $~~392~~1,064,000, or 23%, to $2132,~~261~~849,000 compared to the same period in 2011. The sales results for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 were aided by an additional five business days in 2012 compared to 2011.

GROSS MARGIN

Gross margin for the ~~second~~ third quarter of 2012 decreased by 41.49% to 2933.42%, from 33 35.81% for the same period in 2011. Gross margin for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 decreased by 3.7% to 3132.30%, from 35.0% for the same period in 2011. Warranty expense increased by 2. 0.4% and 0.97% of sales in the quarter and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, respectively, largely as a result of increased sales of recently introduced cardiovascular products. Additionally, margins in 2012 were negatively impacted by our recently introduced treadmill and Arc Trainer products, which traditionally have initial higher manufacturing costs. We expect to achieve cost improvements in these products over time.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $22250,000, or 0.2%, to $910,~~930~~154,000 in the ~~second~~ third quarter of 2012 compared to $910,~~952~~404,000 in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2011, predominantly due to lower marketing, trade show and advertising costs. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $~~936~~680,000, or 52%, to $2131,~~349~~498,000 compared to $2030,~~413~~818,000 for the comparable period in 2011. The increase for the ~~six~~nine month period was predominantly due to higher sales and marketing costs, including initiatives directed to marketing new products, and additional sales and marketing personnel. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 3230% and 31% of sales for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, and 31% and 32% of sales for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 2524, 2011, respectively.

LITIGATION CHARGE (REDUCTION)

The 2011 litigation charges predominantly relate to statutory interest accruing on the Barnhard product liability judgment. The 2012 litigation charge (reduction) ~~relate~~relates to further adjustments to ~~the~~ the Barnhard litigation reserve following settlement of the matter. We do not expect additional Barnhard related adjustments going forward. See Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

NET INTEREST EXPENSE

Net interest expense increased by $93,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the corresponding period of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, net interest expense increased by $74,000. The increases are due to the additional bank debt incurred during the first quarter of 2012. We expect net interest expense for the balance of 2012 to exceed net interest expense for the corresponding periods of 2011, due to this additional bank debt. See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

NET INTEREST EXPENSE

Net interest expense increased by $91,000 in the third quarter of 2012 compared to the corresponding period of 2011. For the nine months ended September 29, 2012, net interest expense increased by $165,000. The increases are due to the additional bank debt incurred during the first quarter of 2012. We expect net interest expense for the balance of 2012 to exceed net interest expense for the corresponding periods of 2011, due to this additional bank debt. See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

INCOME TAXES

A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded to the extent it cannot be determined that the realization of these assets is more likely than not. We established a valuation allowance to fully offset net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2010 due to the uncertainty created by the unfavorable Barnhard jury verdict (see Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Since the March 2012 settlement payment for the Barnhard litigation will increase our net operating loss carryforwards by $18,500,000, and since we had cumulative losses during the three year period ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, it was determined that a valuation allowance against the entire amount of deferred tax assets continues to be appropriate as of ~~June~~September 3029, 2012. Income tax ~~expense~~benefit recorded for 2012 is the reduction in the amount of federal and state income taxes paid in the prior year compared to the amount provided, primarily due to timing of expense payments, offset by the amount of state tax that is currently payable. A 2011 refund of federal alternative minimum taxes paid in prior years of $257,000, recorded as a benefit in 2011 since it was fully reserved as of December 31, 2010, was ~~partially~~ offset by ~~the amount of~~ state and federal alternative minimum taxes of $86108,000 that were currently payable. Accordingly, we recorded an income tax ~~expense~~benefit of ($1374,000 ) and ($2549,000) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, and an income tax expense of $5422,000 and an income tax benefit of ($~~171~~149,000) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2524, 2011, respectively. The effective tax ~~expense (~~ benefit) rate was 3(16.5% ) and (4924.37%) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012 and ~~June~~September 2524, 2011, respectively. Actual cash outlays for taxes continue to be reduced by the available operating loss carryforwards and credits.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, we had working capital of $1716,~~074~~997,000 compared to working capital of $7,862,000 at December 31, 2011. The increase in working capital is primarily due to the net effect of of the settlement of the Barnhard litigation during the first quarter of 2012. The Barnhard settlement payments were primarily funded with cash and the proceeds of long-term debt, and resulted in the elimination of the related ~~litigation~~ litigation reserve.

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, we used $1413,~~733~~936,000 of cash flow from operating activities compared to ~~generating~~ generating $25,~~497~~968,000 of cash flow for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2524, 2011. The decrease in cash flow is predominantly due to the net effect of the settlement of the Barnhard litigation during the first quarter of 2012, offset in part by changes in working capital in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Cash used in investing activities of $12,~~680~~408,000 during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 3029, 2012 consisted of purchases of manufacturing tooling and equipment of $1,~~290~~894,000, primarily for the manufacture of new products, and computer hardware and infrastructure of $~~390~~514,000. Cash used in investing activities of $1,~~163~~954,000 during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2524, 2011 consisted of purchases of ~~computer hardware and infrastructure of $679,000 and purchase of~~ manufacturing tooling and equipment of $~~484~~1,389,000, primarily for the manufacture of new products and computer hardware and infrastructure of $565,000. While capital expenditures for the balance of 2012 are expected to be approximately $21,~~000~~300,000, the timing and amount of these expenditures will depend on economic conditions and results of our operations and our other cash needs.

Cash provided by financing activities was $8,454,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, consisting of the $8,122,000 Medway real estate loan and a net $1,378,000 borrowing on the Citizens revolving credit loan offset by $895,000 of principal payments on the Citizens equipment facility and real estate loans and deferred financing costs of $151,000. Cash used in financing activities was $760,000 for the six months ended June 25, 2011, consisting of principal payments on the Citizens real estate loan.

~~were~~Cash ~~amended~~provided ~~to,~~by ~~among~~financing ~~other~~activities ~~things~~was $6,567,000 ~~increase~~for the ~~ceiling~~nine tomonths ~~our~~ended ~~revolving~~September 29, ~~line~~2012, consisting of ~~credit under~~ the ~~Credit Agreement to~~ $~~18,000,000 and provide under the Loan Agreement an additional $~~8,122,000 Medway real estate loan onand ~~our~~proceeds ~~Medway~~from ~~facility.~~the ~~This~~exercise ~~additional~~of ~~borrowing~~stock ~~capacity~~options ~~was~~of ~~utilized~~$7,000, inoffset ~~part~~by to$1,411,000 ~~finance a portion~~ of ~~the~~principal ~~settlement~~ payments inon the ~~Barnhard~~Citizens ~~product~~equipment ~~liability~~facility ~~suit~~and ~~(see~~real ~~Note~~estate 12loans toand ~~our~~deferred ~~Consolidated~~financing ~~Financial~~costs ~~Statements).~~of ~~Our~~$151,000. ~~Citizens~~Cash ~~equipment~~used ~~facility~~in ~~provided~~financing activities was $41,~~999~~140,000 offor ~~equipment~~the ~~lease~~nine ~~financing~~months ended September 24, ~~the~~2011, ~~proceeds~~consisting of ~~which~~principal ~~were~~payments ~~used~~on inthe ~~June~~Citizens ~~2010 to retire~~ equipment ~~term~~facility ~~loans~~ and ~~related~~real ~~obligations~~estate loan.

We have credit facilities with RBS Citizens, National Association and RBS Asset Finance, Inc. (collectively, “Citizens”). Our Citizens Credit Agreement provides a revolving line of credit of up to the lesser of a ceiling or an amount determined by reference to a borrowing base. Our Citizens Loan Agreement provided for a $13,000,000 real estate loan which was advanced in 2007 to finance the acquisition of our Owatonna facility. In March 2012, the Citizens Credit Agreement and Loan Agreement were amended to, among other things, increase the ceiling to our revolving line of credit under the Credit Agreement to $18,000,000 and provide under the Loan Agreement an additional $8,122,000 real estate loan on our Medway facility. This additional borrowing capacity was utilized in part to finance a portion of the settlement payments in the Barnhard product liability suit (see Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Our Citizens equipment facility provided in 2010 $4,999,000 of equipment lease financing, the proceeds of which were used to retire equipment term loans and related obligations.

The Citizens real estate loans and revolving line of credit are secured by substantially all of our assets. The Citizens equipment facility is secured by our equipment, is cross-collateralized by our accounts receivable and inventory and matures on July 1, 2015. The Citizens Owatonna real estate loan matures on July 2, 2014, the Medway real estate loan matures on March 15, 2017 and the Citizens revolving line of credit matures on July 2, 2013.

WeAt ~~had outstanding at June~~September 3029, 2012, ~~$1,378,000~~there inwere no outstanding revolving credit loans, $18,~~430~~164,000 in real estate loans and $32,~~086~~836,000 under the Citizens equipment facility. Availability under the revolving loan fluctuates daily based on the borrowing base, and is reduced by outstanding advances and letters of credit. At ~~June~~ September 3029, 2012, the net availability under the revolving line of credit was $1416,~~730~~869,000.

At ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, we were in compliance with all financial covenants included within our credit facilities. While there can be no assurance, we believe that we will remain in compliance with our financing agreements during at least the next 12 months.

We rely upon cash flows from our operations and borrowings under our credit facilities to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements. We believe that our cash flows and the availability under our credit facilities are sufficient to fund our general working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next 12 months. However, a decline in sales or margins or a failure to remain in compliance with the terms of our credit facilities or to extend the maturity date of our revolving line of credit could result in having insufficient funds for our working capital and capital expenditure needs.

As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately $16,161,000 in U.S. Federal and non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, substantially all of which will be available to offset future taxable income. These loss carryforwards do not include the charges relating to the settlement in March 2012 of the Barnhard matter, as these charges were not deductible for income tax purposes until 2012.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following is an aggregated summary of the Company’s obligations and commitments to make future payments under various agreements:

	TOTAL		Less Than OneYear		One to ThreeYears			Four to FiveYears		~~Four to FiveYears~~		After Five Years		~~After Five Years~~
Contractual obligations:
Debt	$	2221,~~894~~000,000	$	2,061,000	$ ~~14,384,000~~	12,712,000		$	6,227,000	$	~~6,449,000~~	$	—	$	—
Interest due including impact of interest rate swap (a)		3,149,000		1,274,000			1,593,000				282,000				—
Interest due including impact of interest rateswap (a)		2,996,000		1,177,000		1,580,000			239,000				—
Capital lease obligation (b)		129,000		129,000		—	—		—		—		—		—
Litigation settlement obligation (b)		~~972~~936,000		144,000		288,000	~~288,000~~		288,000		~~288,000~~		216,000		~~252,000~~
Operating lease commitments		1,~~056~~033,000		~~515~~487,000		474,000	~~476,000~~		62,000		~~65,000~~		10,000		—
Purchase obligations		25,~~318~~474,000		1819,~~027~~418,000		6,056,000	~~7,291,000~~		—		—		—		—
	$	5351,~~401~~448,000	$	2223,~~033~~296,000	$~~24,032,000~~	21,110,000		$	6,816,000	$	~~7,084,000~~	$	226,000	$	~~252,000~~

(a)	This includes a fixed rate of 8.25% per the interest rate swap agreements.

(b)	Includes future interest obligations.

We have agreements with our named executive officers that provide for severance payments to the officer in the event the employee is terminated without cause or, in certain situations, the officer resigns after a change of control. The maximum cash exposure under these agreements, assuming the employment of the officers terminated effective as of December 31, 2011, was $2,340,000. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of the executive officer’s separation from the Company.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have a lease financing program whereby we arrange equipment leases and other financing for certain commercial customers for selected products. These leases are sales-type leases and are generally for terms of three to five years, at which time title transfers to the lessee. While most of these financings are without recourse, in certain cases we may offer a guarantee or other recourse provisions. At ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, the maximum ~~contingent~~ contingent liability under all recourse provisions was approximately $2,~~639~~023,000. A reserve for estimated losses under recourse provisions of $~~165~~126,000 has been recorded based upon historical experience, and is included in accrued liabilities at ~~June~~ September 3029, 2012.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, our evaluation of business and macroeconomic trends, and information from other outside sources, as appropriate.

As of ~~June~~September 3029, 2012, there were no material changes to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in market risks from the disclosure within the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) in its periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission'’s rules and forms. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

2122

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Barnhard v. Cybex International, Inc., et al. See Part I Item 3 of the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, for a description of these proceedings which were terminated in the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A, Part I of the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.

RESERVED

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 2.1 - Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 17, 2012 among Cybex International, Inc., CYB Merger Corp., and UM Holdings, Ltd.

Exhibit 31.1 – Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Exhibit 31.2 – Certification of President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Exhibit 32.1 – Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Exhibit 32.2 – Statement of President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Exhibit 101.INS – XBRL Instance Document.

Exhibit 101.SCH – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Exhibit 101.CAL – XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.DEF – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.LAB – XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.PRE – XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

2223

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		Cybex International, Inc.		~~Cybex International, Inc.~~
	August 6, 2012		By:	/s/ John Aglialoro
		By:	/s/ John Aglialoro
				John Aglialoro Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2012			John Aglialoro Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	August 6, 2012		By:	/s/ Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.
		By:	/s/ Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.
				Arthur W. Hicks, Jr. President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
November 5, 2012			Arthur W. Hicks, Jr. President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

2324

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · CYBEX INTERNATIONAL INC