UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from to

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-4682

Thomas & Betts Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Tennessee		22-1326940
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)
8155 T&B Boulevard
8155 T&B BoulevardMemphis, Tennessee		38125
Memphis, Tennessee (Address of principal executive offices)		38125 (Zip Code)
(Address of principalexecutive offices)		(Zip Code)

(901) 252-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post ~~such~~ such files). Yes þ No o ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o¨ Non-accelerated filer o¨ Smaller reporting company o¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the ~~Exchange~~ Exchange Act). Yes o ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

		Outstanding Shares
Title of Each Class		Outstanding Shares at May 2, 2012
Title of Each Class		at October 24, 2011
Common Stock, $.10 par value		52,832,675
Common Stock, $.10 par value		52,049,867

Thomas & Betts Corporation and Subsidiaries

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Financial Statements — Unaudited:		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Quarter EndedMarch 31, 2012 and 2011		3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Quarter EndedMarch 31, 2012 and 2011		4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		5
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Quarter EndedMarch 31, 2012 and 2011		6
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		19
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		33
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andResults of Operations		18
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures		33
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		29
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures		29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings		3430
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors		3430
ITEM 2.	Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers		3430
ITEM 6.	Exhibits		34
ITEM 5.	Other Information		30
SIGNATURE			35
ITEM 6.	Exhibits		30
EXHIBIT INDEX			36
SIGNATURE			31
Statement re Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
EXHIBIT INDEX			32
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Under Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Under Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report includes “forward-looking comments and statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts regarding Thomas & Betts Corporation and are subject to risks and uncertainties in our operations, business, economic and political environment. For further explanation of these risks and uncertainties, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011. Forward looking statements contain words such as:


• “achieve”	• “anticipates”	• “intends”

• “should”	• “expects”	• “predict”

• “could”	• “might”	• “will”

• “may”	• “believes”	• other similar expressions

These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Many factors could affect our future financial condition or results of operations. Accordingly, actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this Report. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statement included in this Report to reflect any future events or circumstances.

A reference in this Report to “we”, “our”, “us”, “Thomas & Betts” or the “Corporation” refers to Thomas & Betts Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

Thomas & Betts Corporation and Subsidiaries ~~Consolidated~~ ~~Statements of Operations (In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)~~

	Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales	$	604,426		$	518,233		$	1,693,903		$	1,471,842
Cost of sales		412,927			352,096			1,168,878			1,013,310
Gross profit		191,499			166,137			525,025			458,532
Selling, general and administrative		110,389			97,470			313,656			289,880
Earnings from operations		81,110			68,667			211,369			168,652
Interest expense, net		(8,476	)		(9,042	)		(24,200	)		(26,315	)
Other (expense) income, net		1,387			(975	)		(315	)		90
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		74,021			58,650			186,854			142,427
Income tax provision		19,688			16,056			53,538			41,324
Net earnings from continuing operations		54,333			42,594			133,316			101,103
Earnings from discontinued operations, net		—			1,510			—			4,554
Net earnings	$	54,333		$	44,104		$	133,316		$	105,657
Basic earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	1.05		$	0.83		$	2.58		$	1.95
Discontinued operations		—			0.02			—			0.09
Net earnings	$	1.05		$	0.85		$	2.58		$	2.04
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	1.03		$	0.81		$	2.51		$	1.91
Discontinued operations		—			0.03			—			0.09
Net earnings	$	1.03		$	0.84		$	2.51		$	2.00
Average shares outstanding:
Basic		51,900			51,602			51,772			51,863
Diluted		52,990			52,641			53,108			52,912

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Net sales	$	607,088		$	523,135
Cost of sales		407,195			359,532

Gross profit		199,893			163,603
Selling, general and administrative		115,564			104,101

Earnings from operations		84,329			59,502
Interest expense, net		(6,185	)		(7,765	)
Other (expense) income, net		(574	)		(985	)

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		77,570			50,752
Income tax provision		22,495			15,226

Net earnings	$	55,075		$	35,526

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.06		$	0.69

Diluted	$	1.03		$	0.67

Average shares outstanding:
Basic		51,960			51,546
Diluted		53,226			52,917

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Thomas & Betts Corporation and Subsidiaries ~~Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands) (Unaudited)~~

	September 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	465,449		$	455,198
Receivables, net		303,962			230,203
Inventories		276,158			220,250
Deferred income taxes		31,669			32,745
Other current assets		23,475			18,699
Total Current Assets		1,100,713			957,095
Property, plant and equipment, net		298,149			305,796
Goodwill		975,536			967,889
Other intangible assets, net		335,466			340,544
Other assets		49,252			61,069
Total Assets	$	2,759,116		$	2,632,393
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	335		$	322
Accounts payable		181,411			190,839
Accrued liabilities		137,236			126,241
Income taxes payable		14,954			26,263
Total Current Liabilities		333,936			343,665
Long-Term Liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current maturities		574,489			574,090
Long-term benefit plan liabilities		134,930			141,998
Deferred income taxes		43,165			41,405
Other long-term liabilities		51,950			64,453
Contingencies (Note 15)
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock		5,140			5,095
Additional paid-in capital		48,378			34,384
Retained earnings		1,654,161			1,520,845
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(87,033	)		(93,542	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		1,620,646			1,466,782
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	2,759,116		$	2,632,393

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Net income	$	55,075		$	35,526

Other comprehensive income, before tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		22,438			30,044
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge		2,069			3,418
Amortization of net prior service costs and net actuarial losses		3,078			2,010

Other comprehensive income, before tax		27,585			35,472

Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income		(1,922	)		(1,907	)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		25,663			33,565

Comprehensive income	$	80,738		$	69,091

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Thomas & Betts Corporation and Subsidiaries ~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands) (Unaudited)~~

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net earnings	$	133,316		$	105,657
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization		63,386			60,031
Share-based compensation expense		9,227			8,730
Deferred income taxes		6,693			(6,491	)
Incremental tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		(2,460	)		(942	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:
Receivables		(65,693	)		(56,707	)
Inventories		(50,608	)		(26,463	)
Accounts payable		(14,286	)		12,258
Accrued liabilities		8,955			18,724
Income taxes payable		(11,624	)		21,885
Other		(5,522	)		8,238
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		71,384			144,920
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired		(29,184	)		(98,910	)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(30,784	)		(22,253	)
Other		2,067			37
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(57,901	)		(121,126	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Stock options exercised		23,909			5,162
Repurchase of common shares		(21,155	)		(42,853	)
Debt issuance costs		(2,231	)		—
Repayment of debt and other borrowings		(304	)		(36,092	)
Incremental tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		2,460			942
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		2,679			(72,841	)
Effect of exchange-rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(5,911	)		5,655
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		10,251			(43,392	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		455,198			478,613
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	465,449		$	435,221
Cash payments for interest	$	21,482		$	23,769
Cash payments for income taxes	$	63,768		$	27,031

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	598,253		$	552,256
Receivables, net		326,730			284,855
Inventories		266,828			236,409
Deferred income taxes		44,073			41,915
Other current assets		28,319			28,498

Total Current Assets		1,264,203			1,143,933

Property, plant and equipment, net		299,880			299,218
Goodwill		980,485			974,287
Other intangible assets, net		318,557			324,564
Other assets		74,285			81,719

Total Assets	$	2,937,410		$	2,823,721


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	528		$	339
Accounts payable		204,677			213,052
Accrued liabilities		123,642			123,266
Income taxes payable		7,185			10,230

Total Current Liabilities		336,032			346,887

Long-Term Liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current maturities		574,165			574,416
Long-term benefit plan liabilities		204,482			207,705
Deferred income taxes		43,082			42,792
Other long-term liabilities		49,505			49,634
Contingencies (Note 13)
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock		5,240			5,130
Additional paid-in capital		85,094			38,085
Retained earnings		1,766,073			1,710,998
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(126,263	)		(151,926	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity		1,730,144			1,602,287

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	2,937,410		$	2,823,721

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Thomas & Betts Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net earnings	$	55,075		$	35,526
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization		20,220			21,037
Share-based compensation expense		3,216			3,742
Deferred income taxes		4,437			3,599
Incremental tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		(8,404	)		(1,326	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:
Receivables		(38,604	)		(41,364	)
Inventories		(28,849	)		(35,505	)
Accounts payable		(10,233	)		(7,487	)
Accrued liabilities		(842	)		786
Income taxes payable		5,660			(11,001	)
Other		(1,076	)		(5,213	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		600			(37,206	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(10,480	)		(12,111	)
Other		165			2

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(10,315	)		(12,109	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Stock options exercised		35,740			18,518
Repayment of debt and other borrowings		(133	)		(78	)
Incremental tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		8,404			1,326

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		44,011			19,766


Effect of exchange-rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		11,701			8,634


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		45,997			(20,915	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		552,256			455,198

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	598,253		$	434,283

Cash payments for interest	$	3,531		$	4,716
Cash payments for income taxes	$	10,406		$	26,768

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Thomas & Betts Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The financial information presented as of any date other than ~~December~~ December 31 has been prepared from the books and records without audit. Financial information as of December 31 has been derived from the Corporation’s audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods indicated have been included. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011. The results of operations for the periods ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~ 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

2. Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

The following is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:

	Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	Quarter EndedMarch 31,
	September 30,				September 30,
	2012		2011
	2011		2010		2011		2010
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Net earnings	$	55,075	$	35,526
Net earnings from continuing operations	$	54,333	$	42,594	$	133,316	$	101,103
Basic shares:
Earnings from discontinued operations, net		—		1,510		—		4,554
Average shares outstanding		51,960		51,546
Net earnings	$	54,333	$	44,104	$	133,316	$	105,657
Basic earnings per share	$	1.06	$	0.69
Basic shares:
Diluted shares:
Average shares outstanding		51,~~900~~960		51,~~602~~546		~~51,772~~		~~51,863~~
Basic earnings per share:
Additional shares on the potential dilution from stock options, nonvested restricted stock and performance units		1,266		1,371
Continuing operations	$	1.05	$	0.83	$	2.58	$	1.95
		53,226		52,917
Discontinued operations		—		0.02		—		0.09
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.03	$	0.67
Net earnings	$	1.05	$	0.85	$	2.58	$	2.04
Diluted shares:
Average shares outstanding		51,900		51,602		51,772		51,863
Additional shares on the potential dilution from stock options, nonvested restricted stock and performance units		1,090		1,039		1,336		1,049
		52,990		52,641		53,108		52,912
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	1.03	$	0.81	$	2.51	$	1.91
Discontinued operations		—		0.03		—		0.09
Net earnings	$	1.03	$	0.84	$	2.51	$	2.00

The Corporation had stock options that were out-of-the-money which were excluded because of their anti-dilutive effect. ~~Such~~ Such out-of-the money stock options were ~~associated~~negligible ~~with~~for 0the first quarter of 2012 and 2011.~~7 million~~

shares of common stock for the third quarter of 2011 and 1.8 million shares of common stock for the third quarter of 2010. Out-of-the money stock options were associated with 0.3 million shares of common stock for the first nine months of 2011 and 1.8 million shares of common stock for the first nine months of 2010.

3. Acquisitions & Divestitures

2011 Acquisition

In July 2011, the Corporation acquired the AmbiRad Group (“AmbiRad”), a leading manufacturer of specialized commercial and industrial heating and ventilation products, which are sold throughout Europe and exported to other global markets, for approximately $30 million. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of approximately $7 million and other intangible assets of approximately $19 million, all of which was assigned to the Corporation’s HVAC segment. The results of these operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation since the acquisition date.

2010 Acquisitions

In April 2010, the Corporation acquired PMA AG (“PMA”), a leading European manufacturer of technologically advanced cable protection systems, for approximately $114 million. The purchase price consisted of cash of approximately $78 million and debt assumed of approximately $36 million. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of approximately $33 million and other intangible assets of approximately $60 million, all of which was assigned to the Company’s Electrical segment. The results of these operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation since the acquisition date.

In January 2010, the Corporation acquired JT Packard & Associates, Inc. (“JT Packard”), the nation’s largest independent service provider for critical power equipment used by industrial and commercial enterprises in a broad array of markets, for approximately $21 million. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of approximately $6 million and other intangible assets of approximately $11 million, all of which was assigned to the Corporation’s Electrical segment. The results of these operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation since the acquisition date.

During 2010, the Corporation divested of its non-strategic communications products business. The operations associated with this business have been reflected as discontinued operations in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of operations. Discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2010 reflected net sales of approximately $15 million, earnings before income taxes of $2.3 million and net earnings of $1.5 million from the divested communications product business. Discontinued operations in the first nine months of 2010 reflected net sales of approximately $45 million, earnings before income taxes of $6.9 million and net earnings of $4.6 million from the divested communications product business.

43. Inventories

The Corporation’s inventories at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~ 2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 were:

	September 30,		December 31,
	March 31,2012		December 31,2011
	2011		2010
(In thousands)
Finished goods	$	~~121~~115,~~335~~713	$	~~106~~109,~~998~~345
Work-in-process		3337,~~310~~543		2329,~~636~~470
Raw materials		~~121~~113,~~513~~572		8997,~~616~~594
Total inventories	$	~~276~~266,~~158~~828	$	~~220~~236,~~250~~409

54. Property, Plant and Equipment

The Corporation’s property, plant and equipment at ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 were:

	September 30,		December 31,
	March 31,2012		December 31,2011
	2011		2010
(In thousands)
Land	$	3332,~~068~~995	$	32,~~775~~590
Building		~~204~~206,~~809~~815		~~201~~206,~~866~~239
Machinery and equipment		~~677~~668,~~112~~617		~~663~~660,~~642~~455
Construction-in-progress		1416,~~953~~687		12,~~412~~293
Gross property, plant and equipment		~~929~~925,~~942~~114		~~910~~911,~~695~~577
Less: Accumulated depreciation		~~631~~625,~~793~~234		~~604~~612,~~899~~359
Net property, plant and equipment	$	~~298~~299,~~149~~880	$	~~305~~299,~~796~~218

65. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table reflects activity for goodwill by segment during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012:

Quarter Ended September 30, 2011

Quarter Ended March 31, 2012

Other —

Balance atBeginning ofPeriod

Additions

Other —PrimarilyCurrencyTranslation

Balance atEnd ofPeriod

Balance at

Primarily

Balance at

Beginning of

Currency

End of

Period

Additions

Translation

Period

(In thousands)

Electrical

~~911~~901,~~263~~632

—

(86,~~376~~060

)

~~902~~907,~~887~~692

Steel Structures

64,759

—

64,759

HVAC

~~702~~7,896

~~7,434~~—

~~(246~~138

)

78,~~890~~034

~~976~~974,~~724~~287

~~7,434~~—

~~( 8~~6,~~622~~198

)

~~975~~980,~~536~~485

The following table reflects activity for ~~goodwill~~other byintangible ~~segment~~ assets during the first ~~nine months~~ quarter of ~~2011~~2012:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Quarter Ended March 31, 2012
						Other —
	Balance atBeginning ofPeriod			Additions		AmortizationExpense			Other —PrimarilyCurrencyTranslation			Balance atEnd ofPeriod
	Balance at					Primarily			Balance at
(In thousands)
	Beginning of					Currency			End of
Intangible assets subject to amortization	$	340,098		$	—	$	—		$	2,292		$	342,390
	Period			Additions		Translation			Period
Accumulated amortization		(125,697	)		—		(8,466	)		(474	)		(134,637	)
(In thousands)
		214,401			—		(8,466	)		1,818			207,753
Electrical	$	902,478		$	—	$	409		$	902,887
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization		110,163			—		—			641			110,804
Steel Structures		64,759			—		—			64,759
Total	$	324,564		$	—	$	(8,466	)	$	2,459		$	318,557
HVAC		652			7,434		(196	)		7,890
	$	967,889		$	7,434	$	213		$	975,536

~~The~~6. Income ~~following~~Taxes ~~table reflects activity for other intangible assets during the third quarter of 2011:~~

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2011
									Other —
	Balance at								Primarily			Balance at
	Beginning of					Amortization			Currency			End of
	Period			Additions		Expense			Translation			Period
(In thousands)
Intangible assets subject to amortization	$	333,834		$	12,208	$	—		$	(4,164	)	$	341,878
Accumulated amortization		(108,727	)		—		(9,131	)		694			(117,164	)
		225,107			12,208		(9,131	)		(3,470	)		224,714
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization		105,400			6,603		—			(1,251	)		110,752
Total	$	330,507		$	18,811	$	(9,131	)	$	(4,721	)	$	335,466

The Corporation’s income tax provision for the first quarter of 2012 was $22.5 million, or an effective rate of 29.0% of pre-tax income, compared to an income tax provision in the first quarter of 2011 of $15.2 million, or an effective rate of 30.0% of pre-tax income. The effective tax rate for each period reflects benefits from the Puerto Rican manufacturing operations, which have a significantly lower effective tax rate than the Corporation’s blended statutory tax rate in other jurisdictions.

~~The~~During ~~following~~the ~~table~~first ~~reflects~~quarter ~~activity~~of 2011, the Corporation concluded a Canada Revenue Agency audit of the Corporation’s Canadian income tax returns for ~~other~~the ~~intangible~~tax years 2005 — 2009, resulting in an ~~assets~~assessment of approximately $8 million, including interest. Substantially all of this assessment was paid during the ~~first~~second ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of 2011:. The Canadian tax assessment is offset by an expected recovery of U.S. federal and state income taxes of approximately $7 million, resulting from the Corporation’s petition for tax relief under the competent authority administrative process.

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
									Other —
	Balance at								Primarily		Balance at
	Beginning of					Amortization			Currency		End of
	Period			Additions		Expense			Translation		Period
(In thousands)
Intangible assets subject to amortization	$	328,177		$	12,208	$	—		$	1,493	$	341,878
Accumulated amortization		(91,370	)		—		(25,983	)		189		(117,164	)
		236,807			12,208		(25,983	)		1,682		224,714
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization		103,737			6,603		—			412		110,752
Total	$	340,544		$	18,811	$	(25,983	)	$	2,094	$	335,466

The Corporation had net deferred tax assets totaling $17.4 million as of March 31, 2012 and net deferred tax assets totaling $24.6 million as of December 31, 2011. Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Corporation’s ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. Management believes that it is more-likely-than-not that future taxable income, based on tax laws in effect as of March 31, 2012, will be sufficient to realize the recorded deferred tax assets, net of any valuation allowance.

7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Corporation’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, short-term receivables and payables, and debt. Included in cash and cash equivalents are money market funds which are valued based on the published net asset value (“NAV”). Financial instruments also include an interest rate swap agreement, which is discussed further in Note 9 below. The carrying amounts of the Corporation’s financial instruments generally approximated their fair values at

7. March 31, ~~Income~~2012 ~~Taxes~~and December 31, 2011, except that, based on the borrowing rates available to the Corporation under current market conditions, the fair value of long-term debt (including current maturities) using Level 2 fair value inputs was approximately $610 million at March 31, 2012 and $601 million at December 31, 2011.

~~The Corporation’s income tax provision for the third quarter of 2011 was $19~~8.~~7 million,~~ Debt or an effective rate of 26.6% of pre-tax income, compared to an income tax provision in the third quarter of 2010 of $16.1 million, or an effective rate of 27.4% of pre-tax income. The Corporation’s income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $53.5 million, or an effective rate of 28.7% of pre-tax income, compared to an income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $41.3 million, or an effective rate of 29.0% of pre-tax income. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the third quarter and first nine months of 2011 primarily reflects the impact of shifts in the estimated global distribution of our current year annual pre-tax earnings. The effective tax rate for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 reflects the favorable impact of the release of a $1.5 million tax reserve associated with an outstanding tax issue. The effective tax rate for each period also reflects benefits from the Puerto Rican manufacturing operations, which have a significantly lower effective tax rate than the Corporation’s blended statutory tax rate in other jurisdictions.

~~During~~The ~~the first quarter of 2011, the~~ Corporation ~~concluded a Canada Revenue Agency audit of the Corporation~~’s ~~Canadian income~~long-term ~~tax~~debt ~~returns~~at ~~for the tax years 2005~~March ~~— 2009~~31, ~~resulting~~ in2012 anand ~~assessment of approximately $8~~December ~~million~~31, ~~including~~ ~~interest.~~2011 ~~Substantially all of this assessment~~ was ~~paid~~: during the second quarter of 2011. The Canadian tax assessment is offset by an expected recovery of U.S. federal and state income taxes of approximately $7 million, resulting from the Corporation’s petition for tax relief under the competent authority administrative process.

The Corporation had deferred tax liabilities in excess of its deferred tax assets totaling $5.6 million as of September 30, 2011 and net deferred tax assets totaling $12.4 million as of December 31, 2010. Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Corporation’s ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. Management believes that it is more-likely-than-not that future taxable income, based on tax laws in effect as of September 30, 2011, will be sufficient to realize the recorded deferred tax assets, net of any valuation allowance.


	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
(In thousands)
Senior credit facility due August 2016^(a)	$	—	$	—
Senior credit facility due October 2012^(a)		325,000		325,000
Unsecured 5.625% Senior Notes due 2021^(b)		248,635		248,570
Other, including capital leases		1,058		1,185

Long-term debt (including current maturities)		574,693		574,755
Less current maturities		528		339

Long-term debt, net of current maturities	$	574,165	$	574,416

8.(a) ~~Comprehensive~~Interest ~~Income~~is paid monthly.

~~Total~~(b) ~~comprehensive~~Interest ~~income~~is ~~and~~paid ~~its components are as follows:~~ semi-annually.

	Quarter Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
(In thousands)
Net earnings	$	54,333		$	44,104	$	133,316		$	105,657
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge, net of tax		2,330			1,100		6,302			1,829
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(31,836	)		34,027		(3,731	)		4,433
Amortization of net prior service costs and net actuarial losses, net of tax		1,268			2,104		3,938			6,766
Comprehensive income	$	26,095		$	81,335	$	139,825		$	118,685

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Corporation had outstanding $250 million of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2021. The indentures underlying the unsecured notes contain standard covenants such as restrictions on mergers, liens on certain property, sale-leaseback of certain property and funded debt for certain subsidiaries. The indentures also include standard events of default such as covenant default and cross-acceleration.

9The Corporation has an unsecured, senior credit facility (“new revolving credit facility”) with total availability of $500 million and a five year term expiring in August 2016. ~~Fair~~As ~~Value~~of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no borrowings were outstanding under this facility. Under the new revolving credit facility agreement, the Corporation will select an interest rate at the time of ~~Financial~~its ~~Instruments~~initial draw reflecting LIBOR plus a margin based on the Corporation’s credit rating or the highest rate based on several other benchmark rates, including: (i) JPMorgan Chase Bank’s New York Prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate, or (iii) an adjusted LIBOR rate, plus a margin based on our credit rating.

The Corporation’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, short-term receivables and payables, and debt. Financial instruments also include an interest rate swap agreement, which is discussed further in Note 11 below. The carrying amounts of the Corporation’s financial instruments generally approximated their fair values at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, except that, based on the borrowing rates available to

the Corporation under current market conditions, the fair value of long-term debt (including current maturities) was approximately $622 million at September 30, 2011 and $588 million at December 31, 2010.

10. Debt

The Corporation’s long-term debt at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
(In thousands)
Senior credit facility due August 2016(a)	$	—	$	—
Senior credit facility due October 2012(a)		325,000		325,000
Unsecured 5.625% Senior Notes due 2021(b)		248,505		248,301
Other, including capital leases		1,319		1,111
Long-term debt (including current maturities)		574,824		574,412
Less current maturities		335		322
Long-term debt, net of current maturities	$	574,489	$	574,090

(a) Interest is paid monthly. (b) Interest is paid semi-annually.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Corporation had outstanding $250 million of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2021. The indentures underlying the unsecured notes contain standard covenants such as restrictions on mergers, liens on certain property, sale-leaseback of certain property and funded debt for certain subsidiaries. The indentures also include standard events of default such as covenant default and cross-acceleration.

During the third quarter of 2011, the Corporation entered into a new $500 million unsecured, senior credit facility (“new revolving credit facility”) with a five year term expiring in August 2016. At September 30, 2011, no borrowings were outstanding under this facility. Under the new revolving credit facility agreement, the Corporation will select an interest rate at the time of its initial draw reflecting LIBOR plus a margin based on the Corporation’s credit rating or the highest rate based on several other benchmark rates, including: (i) JPMorgan Chase Bank’s New York Prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate, or (iii) an adjusted LIBOR rate.

All borrowings and other extensions of credit under the Corporation’s new revolving credit facility are subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, including absence of defaults and accuracy in material respects of representations and warranties. The proceeds of any loans under the facility may be used for general operating needs and for other general corporate purposes in compliance with the terms of the facility agreement. The Corporation pays an annual commitment fee to maintain the facility of 20 basis points.

Fees to access the facility and letters of credit are based on a pricing grid related to the Corporation’s debt ratings with Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch during the term of the facility.

The Corporation’s new revolving credit facility requires that it maintain:

	•	a maximum leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1.00; and
	•	a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00.

•

a maximum leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1.00; and

•

a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00.

The new revolving credit facility also contains customary covenants that could restrict the Corporation’s ability to: incur additional indebtedness; grant liens; make investments, loans, or guarantees; declare dividends; or repurchase company stock.

Outstanding letters of credit, which reduced availability under the new revolving credit facility, amounted to $17.7 million at March 31, 2012. The letters of credit relate primarily to third-party insurance claims.

Concurrent to entering into the new revolving credit facility, the Corporation amended its existing unsecured, senior credit facility (“existing revolving credit facility”) to reduce the total availability under this facility from $750 million to the $325 million of debt outstanding plus open letters of credit outstanding under the facility at the time of the amendment. Letters of credit under this facility at March 31, 2012 amounted to $2.3 million. The letters of credit relate primarily to environmental assurances. As borrowings and letters of credit under the facility are reduced, the amount of the facility will decrease.

The amendment to the existing revolving credit facility conformed all covenants and obligations to those found in the new revolving credit facility, except those related to interest on borrowings and fees, which remain unchanged. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $325 million was outstanding under this facility. The existing revolving credit facility has a five-year term expiring October 2012. The outstanding balance of the existing revolving credit facility has been classified as long-term debt in the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet based on the Corporation’s ability and intent to refinance this debt on a long-term basis through use of funds available under its new revolving credit facility or through borrowings in private or public capital markets.

The Corporation has a EUR 10 million (approximately US$13.3 million) committed revolving credit facility with a European bank. The Corporation pays an annual commitment fee of 20 basis points on the undrawn balance to maintain this facility. This credit facility contains standard covenants and events of default such as covenant default and cross-default. This facility has an indefinite maturity, and no borrowings were outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Outstanding letters of credit which reduced availability under the European facility amounted to EUR 1.8 million (approximately US$2.4 million) at March 31, 2012.

The Corporation has a CAN 10 million (approximately US$10.1 million) committed revolving credit facility with a Canadian bank. The Corporation pays an annual commitment fee of 20 basis points on the undrawn balance to maintain this facility. This credit facility contains standard covenants and events of default such as covenant default and cross-default. This facility matures in 2016, and no borrowings were outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

As of March 31, 2012, the Corporation’s aggregate availability of funds under its credit facilities is approximately $503 million, after deducting outstanding letters of credit. The Corporation has the option, at the time of drawing funds under any of the credit facilities, of selecting an interest rate based on a number of benchmarks including LIBOR, the federal funds rate, or the prime rate of the agent bank.

~~The~~As ~~new~~of ~~revolving~~March 31, ~~credit~~2012, ~~facility~~the Corporation also ~~contains~~had ~~customary~~letters of credit in addition to those ~~covenants~~discussed above that ~~could~~do ~~restrict~~not reduce availability under the Corporation’s ~~ability~~credit ~~to: incur~~facilities. The Corporation had $21.5 million of such additional ~~indebtedness;~~letters ~~grant~~of ~~liens;~~credit ~~make~~that ~~investments~~relate primarily to third-party insurance claims processing, performance ~~loans~~bonds, orperformance guarantees; ~~declare~~and ~~dividends;~~acquisition ~~or repurchase company stock~~obligations.

~~Outstanding letters of credit, which reduced availability under the new revolving credit facility, amounted to $4~~9.~~7 million at~~ Derivative ~~September 30,~~Instruments ~~2011. The letters of credit relate primarily to environmental assurances.~~

Concurrent to entering into the new revolving credit facility, the Corporation amended its existing unsecured, senior credit facility (“existing revolving credit facility”) to reduce the total availability under this facility from $750 million to the $325 million of debt outstanding plus open letters of credit outstanding under the facility at the time of the amendment. Letters of credit under this facility at September 30, 2011 amounted to $17.6 million. The letters of credit relate primarily to third-party insurance claims processing. As borrowings and letters of credit under the facility are reduced, the amount of the facility will decrease.

The Corporation has a EUR 10 million (approximately US$13.6 million) committed revolving credit facility with a European bank. The Corporation pays an annual commitment fee of 20 basis points on the undrawn balance to maintain this facility. This credit facility contains standard covenants and events of default such as covenant default and cross-default. This facility has an indefinite maturity, and no borrowings were outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Outstanding letters of credit which reduced availability under the European facility amounted to EUR 0.9 million (approximately US$1.2 million) at September 30, 2011.

The Corporation has a CAN 30 million (approximately US$29.4 million) committed revolving credit facility with a Canadian bank. The Corporation pays an annual commitment fee of 12.5 basis points on the undrawn balance to maintain this facility. This credit facility contains standard covenants and events of default such as covenant default and cross-default. This facility matures in December 2011, and no borrowings were outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

As of September 30, 2011, the Corporation’s aggregate availability of funds under its credit facilities is approximately $537 million, after deducting outstanding letters of credit.

As of September 30, 2011, the Corporation also had letters of credit in addition to those discussed above that do not reduce availability under the Corporation’s credit facilities. The Corporation had approximately $19 million of such additional letters of credit that relate primarily to environmental assurances, third-party insurance claims processing, performance bonds, performance guarantees and acquisition obligations.

11. Derivative Instruments

The Corporation is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and raw material prices, among others. At times, the Corporation may enter into various derivative instruments to manage certain of those risks. The Corporation does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

Interest Rate Swap Agreement

~~During~~The ~~2007, the~~ Corporation ~~entered~~has ~~into~~ a forward-starting amortizing interest rate swap for a notional amount of $~~390~~200 million. The ~~notional~~interest ~~amount~~rate ~~reduced~~swap ~~to $325 million~~agreement inexpires ~~December~~on ~~2010~~October 1, ~~and reduces to $200 million in December 2011 and $0 in October~~ 2012. The interest rate swap hedges the Corporation’s exposure to changes in interest rates on $~~325~~ 200 million of borrowings under its existing revolving credit facility. The Corporation has designated the receive variable/pay fixed interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes. Under the interest rate swap, the Corporation receives one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and pays an underlying fixed rate of 4.86%. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the applicable periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains or losses on the derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current period earnings.

The Corporation values the interest rate swap at fair value. Fair value is the price received to transfer an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Measuring fair value involves a hierarchy of valuation inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and, Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring a company to develop its own valuation assumptions.

The Corporation’s interest rate swap was reflected in the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet in other long-term liabilities at its fair value of $115.01 million as of ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and $217.32 million as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011. This swap is measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period. The Corporation’s fair value estimate was determined using significant unobservable inputs and assumptions (Level 3) and, in addition, the liability valuation reflects the Corporation’s credit standing. The valuation technique utilized by the Corporation to calculate the swap fair value is the income approach. Using inputs for current market expectations of LIBOR rates, Eurodollar futures prices, treasury yields and interest rate swap spreads, this approach compares the present value of a constructed zero coupon yield curve and the present value of an extrapolated forecast of future interest rates. This determined value is then reduced by a credit valuation adjustment that takes into effect the current credit risk of the interest rate swap counterparty or the Corporation, as applicable. The credit valuation adjustment was negligible as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

~~The~~12 Corporation’s balance of accumulated other comprehensive income has been reduced by $6.8 million, net of tax of $4.2 million, as of September 30, 2011 and $13.1 million, net of tax of $8.0 million, as of December 31, 2010 to reflect the above interest rate swap liability.

The ~~following~~Corporation’s isbalance aof ~~reconciliation~~accumulated ~~associated~~other ~~with~~comprehensive ~~the~~income ~~interest~~has been reduced by ~~rate~~$3.2 million, ~~swap~~net of ~~the~~tax ~~fair~~of ~~value~~$1.9 million, ~~activity~~as ~~using~~of ~~Level~~March 331, ~~inputs during~~2012 ~~the~~and ~~third~~$4.4 million, ~~quarter~~net ~~and~~of ~~first~~tax ~~nine~~of ~~months~~$2.7 million, as of December 31, 2011 ~~and~~to ~~2010:~~ reflect the above interest rate swap liability.

	Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(In millions)
Asset (liability) at beginning of period	$	(14.8	)	$	(27.5	)	$	(21.3	)	$	(28.7	)
Total realized/unrealized gains or losses:
Included in earnings		(3.8	)		(4.6	)		(11.4	)		(13.6	)
Increase (decrease) in fair value included in comprehensive income		3.7			1.9			10.2			3.0
Settlements		3.9			4.5			11.5			13.6
Asset (liability) at end of period	$	(11.0	)	$	(25.7	)	$	(11.0	)	$	(25.7	)

The following is a reconciliation associated with the interest rate swap of the fair value activity using Level 3 inputs during the first quarter of 2012 and 2011:

The ineffective portion of the swap reflected in interest expense, net during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2011 and 2010 was immaterial.


	Quarter Ended
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
(In millions)
Asset (liability) at beginning of period	$	(7.2	)	$	(21.3	)
Total realized/unrealized gains or losses:
Included in earnings		(2.3	)		(3.7	)
Increase (decrease) in fair value included in comprehensive income		2.1			3.4
Settlements		2.3			3.8

Asset (liability) at end of period	$	(5.1	)	$	(17.8	)

Interest expense, net reflects a negligible benefit during the first quarter of 2012 and 2011 for the ineffective portion of the swap.

Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts

The Corporation had no outstanding forward sale or purchase contracts as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 or December 31, ~~2010~~ 2011. The Corporation is exposed to the effects of changes in exchange rates primarily from the Canadian dollar and European currencies. From time to time, the Corporation utilizes forward foreign exchange contracts for the sale or purchase of foreign currencies to mitigate this risk.

Commodities Futures Contracts

The Corporation had no outstanding commodities futures contracts as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 or December 31, ~~2010~~2011. The Corporation is exposed to risk from fluctuating prices for certain materials used to manufacture its products, such as: steel, aluminum, copper, zinc, resins and rubber compounds. At times, some of the risk associated with usage of aluminum, copper and zinc has been mitigated through the use of futures contracts that mitigate the price exposure to these commodities.

1210. Share-Based Payment Arrangements

Share-based compensation expense, net of tax, of $12.50 million and $12.43 million was charged against ~~income~~ income during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively. ~~Share-based~~ ~~compensation~~During ~~expense,~~the ~~net~~first quarter of ~~tax~~2012, ~~of $5.7 million~~the ~~and~~Corporation ~~$5.4 million~~had ~~was~~1,088,428 ~~charged~~stock ~~against income~~options ~~during~~exercised ~~the~~at ~~first~~a ~~nine~~weighted ~~months~~average exercise price of ~~2011~~$32.84 per share and ~~2010~~had 4,313 stock options forfeited or ~~respectively~~expired.

~~During~~13 the third quarter of 2011, the Corporation had 18,179 stock options exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $26.14 per share and had 4,269 stock options forfeited or expired. During the first nine months of 2011, the Corporation had 672,257 stock options exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $35.55 per share and had 18,750 stock options forfeited or

~~expired~~11. Pension ~~During~~and ~~the~~Other ~~first~~Postretirement ~~nine~~Benefits ~~months of 2011, the Corporation granted 4,367 nonvested shares (restricted stock) with a weighted average grant date fair value of $52.66 per share.~~

Compensation expense, net of tax, of $0.3 million was charged to selling, general and administrative expense as of the grant date for stock awards under the Corporation’s Non-Employee Directors Equity Compensation Plan during the first nine months of both 2011 and 2010. The Corporation granted non-employee members of the Board of Directors a total of 8,082 shares of common stock with a weighted average grant date fair value of $55.66 during the first nine months of 2011.

13. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Net periodic cost for the Corporation’s pension and other postretirement benefits included the following components:

	Quarter Ended
							Other
	Pension Benefits						OtherPostretirementBenefits
							Postretirement
	March 31,2012			March 31,2011			March 31,2012			March 31,2011
	Pension Benefits						Benefits
	September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Service cost	$	~~1,006~~897		$	21,~~768~~039		$	12		$	2—
Interest cost		76,~~313~~618			7,~~315~~344			~~197~~160			~~229~~203
Expected return on plan assets		(8,~~541~~311	)		(8,~~298~~524	)		—			—
Plan net loss (gain)		12,~~599~~658			31,~~094~~596			2735			~~(31~~58	)
Prior service cost (gain)		~~227~~197			283			~~(63~~193	)		(63	)
Transition obligation (asset)		(53	)		(45	)		~~192~~5			192
Net curtailment/settlement loss (gain)		~~(165~~—	)		—			—			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	12,~~434~~056		$	51,~~158~~733		$	~~354~~395		$	~~329~~390

	Nine Months Ended
							Other
							Postretirement
	Pension Benefits						Benefits
	September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Service cost	$	3,072		$	8,045		$	4		$	4
Interest cost		22,015			21,745			593			688
Expected return on plan assets		(25,692	)		(24,692	)		—			—
Plan net loss (gain)		4,810			9,248			81			(93	)
Prior service cost (gain)		685			847			(189	)		(189	)
Transition obligation (asset)		(15	)		(12	)		575			575
Net curtailment/settlement loss (gain)		830			1,213			—			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	5,705		$	16,394		$	1,064		$	985

Contributions to our qualified pension plans during the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were not significant. We expect required contributions to our qualified pension plans during the remainder of 2012 to be minimal.

15 12. Segment Disclosures

Contributions to our qualified pension plans during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were not significant. We expect required contributions to our qualified pension plans during the remainder of 2011 to be minimal.

14. Segment Disclosures

The Corporation has three reportable segments: Electrical, Steel Structures and HVAC. The Corporation’s reportable segments are based primarily on product lines and represent the primary mode used to assess allocation of resources and performance. The Corporation evaluates its business segments primarily on the basis of segment earnings, with segment earnings defined as earnings before corporate expense, depreciation and amortization expense, share-based compensation expense, interest, income taxes and certain other items. Corporate expense includes legal, finance and administrative costs. The Corporation has no material inter-segment sales.

The Electrical segment designs, manufactures and markets thousands of different electrical connectors, components and other products for industrial, construction and utility applications. The Steel Structures segment designs, manufactures and markets highly engineered steel transmission structures. The HVAC segment designs, manufactures and markets heating and ventilation products for commercial and industrial buildings. The Corporation’s U.S. Electrical and International Electrical operating segments have been aggregated in the Electrical reporting segment since they have similar economic characteristics as well as similar products and services, production processes, types of customers and methods used for distributing their products.

	Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Net Sales
Electrical	$	500,693		$	439,172		$	1,427,992		$	1,235,759
Steel Structures		66,893			57,232			176,604			166,753
HVAC		36,840			21,829			89,307			69,330
Total	$	604,426		$	518,233		$	1,693,903		$	1,471,842
Segment Earnings
Electrical	$	105,165		$	89,588		$	285,281		$	237,786
Steel Structures		10,497			11,092			19,078			29,027
HVAC		3,024			2,868			10,047			9,466
Segment earnings		118,686			103,548			314,406			276,279
Corporate expense		(13,709	)		(12,615	)		(30,424	)		(40,205	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(21,426	)		(20,054	)		(63,386	)		(58,775	)
Share-based compensation expense		(2,441	)		(2,212	)		(9,227	)		(8,647	)
Interest expense, net		(8,476	)		(9,042	)		(24,200	)		(26,315	)
Other (expense) income, net		1,387			(975	)		(315	)		90
Earnings before income taxes	$	74,021		$	58,650		$	186,854		$	142,427

15. Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Corporation is involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In those cases where the Corporation is the defendant, plaintiffs may seek to recover large

or sometimes unspecified amounts or other types of relief and some matters may remain unresolved for several years. Such matters may be subject to many uncertainties and outcomes which are not predictable with assurance. The Corporation has provided for losses to the extent probable and estimable. The legal matters that have been recorded in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements are based on gross assessments of expected settlement or expected outcome and do not reflect possible recovery from insurance companies or other parties. Additional losses, even though not anticipated, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity in any given period.


	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
(In thousands)
Net Sales
Electrical	$	483,964		$	443,520
Steel Structures		82,108			50,945
HVAC		41,016			28,670

Total	$	607,088		$	523,135

Segment Earnings
Electrical	$	100,422		$	86,936
Steel Structures		19,389			4,292
HVAC		7,664			4,562

Segment earnings		127,475			95,790
Corporate expense		(19,710	)		(11,509	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(20,220	)		(21,037	)
Share-based compensation expense		(3,216	)		(3,742	)
Interest expense, net		(6,185	)		(7,765	)
Other (expense) income, net		(574	)		(985	)

Earnings before income taxes	$	77,570		$	50,752

13. Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Corporation is involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In those cases where the Corporation is the defendant, plaintiffs may seek to recover large or sometimes unspecified amounts or other types of relief and some matters may remain unresolved for several years. Such matters may be subject to many uncertainties and outcomes which are not predictable with assurance. The Corporation has provided for losses to the extent probable and estimable. The legal matters that have been recorded in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements are based on gross assessments of expected settlement or expected outcome and do not reflect possible recovery from insurance companies or other parties. Additional losses, even though not anticipated, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity in any given period.

Guarantee and Indemnification Arrangements

The Corporation generally warrants its products against certain manufacturing and other defects. These product warranties are provided for specific periods of time and usage of the product depending on the nature of the product, the geographic location of its sale and other factors. The accrued product warranty costs are based primarily on historical experience of actual warranty claims as well as current information on repair costs.

The following table provides the changes in the Corporation’s accruals for estimated product warranties:

	Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	Quarter EndedMarch 31,
	September 30,						September 30,
	2012			2011
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,213		$	2,574
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,107		$	2,798		$	2,574		$	3,064
Acquired liabilities for warranties		—			—
Acquired liabilities for warranties		609			—			609			—
Liabilities accrued for warranties issued during the period		1,760			455
Liabilities accrued for warranties issued during the period		853			404			2,444			1,141
Warranty claims paid during the period		(709	)		(258	)
Warranty claims paid during the period		(1,595	)		(453	)		(2,577	)		(1,471	)
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties during the period, including expirations		(196	)		(64	)
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties during the period, including expirations		14			10			(62	)		25
Balance at end of period	$	4,068		$	2,707
Balance at end of period	$	2,988		$	2,759		$	2,988		$	2,759

The Corporation also continues to monitor events that are subject to guarantees and indemnifications to identify whether it is probable that a loss has occurred, and would recognize any such losses under the guarantees and indemnifications at fair value when those losses are estimable.

1614. Merger ~~Share~~Agreement ~~Repurchase Plan~~

InOn ~~September~~January 29, ~~2010~~2012, ~~the~~Thomas & Betts Corporation’s, ~~Board~~Swiss-based ofABB ~~Directors~~Ltd (“ABB”) and a wholly owned ~~approved~~subsidiary of ABB entered into a ~~share~~merger ~~repurchase~~agreement. ~~plan~~At ~~that~~the ~~authorized~~closing of the merger contemplated by the merger agreement, (i) the Corporation will become a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of ABB, and (ii) each common share of the Corporation towill ~~buy~~be upconverted into the right to receive $72.00 in cash (approximately $3~~,000,000~~.9 ofbillion ~~its~~total ~~common~~purchase ~~shares~~consideration), without interest. ~~To-date~~On ~~through September~~ March 30, ~~2011~~2012, the Corporation ~~repurchased,~~filed a definitive proxy statement in connection with the merger transaction. ~~available~~[On ~~cash~~May ~~resources~~2, 12012,~~000,000~~ a majority of the shareholders of the Corporation’s common ~~shares~~stock ~~through open-market~~voted ~~transactions~~to ~~under~~approve ~~this~~the ~~plan~~merger transaction.] ~~During~~The ~~the~~closing ~~third quarter~~of ~~and~~the ~~first~~merger ~~nine~~is ~~months~~subject ofto ~~2011~~customary conditions, ~~the~~including ~~Corporation repurchased,~~certain ~~with~~regulatory ~~available~~approvals. ~~cash~~Among ~~resources~~other things, ~~500,000~~the ~~common shares~~merger ~~through~~agreement ~~open-market~~contains ~~transactions~~certain ~~under~~termination ~~this~~rights ~~plan.~~for ~~The timing~~the ofCorporation ~~future~~and ~~repurchases~~ABB, ifand ~~any,~~further ~~will~~provides ~~depend~~that, upon atermination ~~variety~~ of ~~factors~~the merger agreement under specified circumstances, ~~including~~the ~~market~~Corporation ~~conditions.~~will ~~This~~be ~~authorization~~obligated to pay a termination ~~expires~~fee into ~~December~~ABB ~~2012~~of $116 million.

Shortly after the announcement of the merger, five putative class action lawsuits challenging the merger were filed in the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tennessee (the “Chancery Court”) and the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (“Tennessee Federal Court”) against various combinations of Thomas & Betts, ABB, Merger Sub, the individual members of the Thomas & Betts Board of Directors, certain other Thomas & Betts officers and Deutsche Bank. The complaints generally allege that the members of the Thomas & Betts Board breached their fiduciary duties to Thomas & Betts’ shareholders by entering into the merger agreement, approving the proposed merger and failing to take steps to maximize Thomas & Betts’ value to its shareholders, and that Thomas & Betts, ABB and Merger Sub aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaints also allege that the proposed merger improperly favors ABB and that certain provisions of the merger agreement unduly restrict Thomas & Betts’ ability to negotiate with other potential bidders. In addition, certain of the complaints assert claims under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) based on allegations that the Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed by Thomas & Betts with the SEC on February 17, 2012 (the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”) is materially misleading and omits material information.

The complaints generally seek, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief, preliminary injunctive relief prohibiting or delaying the defendants from consummating the merger and other forms of equitable relief. On March 30, 2012, plaintiffs in the aforementioned shareholder litigations, along with Thomas & Betts, the individual members of the Thomas & Betts Board and certain other Thomas & Betts officers, reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation, which was memorialized in a memorandum of understanding. Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding, Thomas & Betts included in the definitive proxy statement certain additional disclosures relating to the merger.

17. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. This standard eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity and instead requires that such information be presented in either (1) a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or (2) in two separate but consecutive statements. This new guidance is effective beginning in 2012 and must be applied retrospectively. This standard concerns financial statement presentation only and will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Overview

Thomas & Betts Corporation is a global leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of essential components used to manage the connection, distribution, transmission and reliability of electrical power in industrial, construction and utility applications. We are also a leading producer of commercial heating and ventilation units used in commercial and industrial buildings and highly engineered steel structures used for utility transmission. We have operations in over 20 countries. Manufacturing, marketing and sales activities are concentrated primarily in North America and Europe.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements contained in this report requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain amounts reported as net sales, costs, expenses, assets or liabilities and certain amounts disclosed as contingent assets or liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates or assumptions. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011. We believe our critical accounting policies include the following:

• Revenue Recognition: We recognize revenue when products are shipped and the customer takes ownership and assumes risk of loss, collection of the relevant receivable is probable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable. We recognize revenue for service agreements over the applicable service periods. Sales discounts, quantity and price rebates, and allowances are estimated based on contractual commitments and experience and recorded as a reduction of revenue in the period in which the sale is recognized. Quantity rebates are in the form of volume incentive discount plans, which include specific sales volume targets or year-over-year sales volume growth targets for specific customers. Certain distributors can take advantage of price rebates by subsequently reselling our products into targeted construction projects or markets. Following a distributor’s sale of an eligible product, the distributor submits a claim for a price rebate. A number of distributors, primarily in our Electrical segment, have the right to return goods under certain circumstances and those returns, which are reasonably estimable, are accrued as a reduction of revenue at the time of shipment. We analyze historical returns and allowances, current economic trends and specific customer circumstances when evaluating the adequacy of accounts receivable related reserves and accruals. We provide allowances for doubtful accounts when credit losses are both probable and estimable. • Inventory Valuation: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. To ensure inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market, we periodically evaluate the carrying value of our inventories. We also periodically perform an evaluation of inventory for excess and obsolete items. Such evaluations are based on management’s judgment and use of estimates. Such estimates incorporate inventory quantities on-hand, aging of the inventory, sales history and forecasts for particular product groupings, planned dispositions of product lines and overall industry trends. • Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: We apply the acquisition (purchase) method of accounting for all business combinations. Under this method, all assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, including goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and other

19 • Inventory Valuation: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. To ensure inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market, we periodically evaluate the carrying value of our inventories. We also periodically perform an evaluation of inventory for excess and obsolete items. Such evaluations are based on management’s judgment and use of estimates. Such estimates incorporate inventory quantities on-hand, aging of the inventory, sales history and forecasts for particular product groupings, planned dispositions of product lines and overall industry trends.

•

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: We apply the acquisition (purchase) method of accounting for all business combinations. Under this method, all assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, including goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and other intangibles, are recorded at fair value. The purchase price allocation requires subjective judgments concerning estimates of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Goodwill

~~intangibles, are recorded at fair value. The purchase price allocation requires subjective judgments concerning estimates of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Goodwill~~ consists principally of the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations and is not amortized. For each amortizable intangible asset, we use a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed. If that pattern cannot be reliably determined, the straight-line amortization method is used. We perform an annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We perform our annual impairment assessment as of the beginning of the fourth quarter of each year, unless circumstances dictate more frequent interim assessments. In evaluating when an interim assessment of goodwill is necessary, we consider, among other things, the trading level of our common stock, our market capitalization, changes in expected future cash flows and mergers and acquisitions involving companies in our industry. In evaluating when an interim assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets is necessary, we review for significant events or significant changes in circumstances. Our evaluation process did not result in an interim assessment of goodwill or long-lived intangible assets for recoverability for the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012.

In conjunction with each test of goodwill we determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare the fair value to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. We determine the fair value of our reporting units using a combination of three valuation methods: market multiple approach; discounted cash flow approach; and comparable transactions approach. The market multiple approach provides indications of value based on market multiples for public companies involved in similar lines of business. The discounted cash flow approach calculates the present value of projected future cash flows using appropriate discount rates. The comparable transactions approach provides indications of value based on an examination of recent transactions in which companies in similar lines of business were acquired. The fair values derived from these three valuation methods are then weighted to arrive at a single value for each reporting unit. Relative weights assigned to the three methods are based upon the availability, relevance and reliability of the underlying data. We then reconcile the total values for all reporting units to our market capitalization and evaluate the reasonableness of the implied control premium.

To the extent a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit’s goodwill may be impaired, and we must perform a second more detailed impairment assessment. The second impairment assessment involves allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill as of the assessment date. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill to quantify an impairment charge as of the assessment date.

Methods used to determine fair values for indefinite-lived intangible assets involve customary valuation techniques that are applicable to the particular class of intangible asset and apply inputs and assumptions that we believe a market participant would use.

• Long-Lived Assets: We review long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Indications of impairment require significant judgment by management. For purposes of recognizing and measuring impairment of long-lived assets, we evaluate assets at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows for associated product groups. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of the primary asset in the associated product groups is less than the carrying amount of the assets, the

assets are considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. When fair values are not available, we estimate fair values using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to dispose.

•

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Actuarial Assumptions: We recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of benefit plans in our consolidated balance sheets. For purposes of calculating pension and postretirement medical benefit obligations and related costs, we use certain actuarial assumptions. Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors (retirement patterns, mortality and turnover), rate of compensation increase and the healthcare cost trend rate. See additional information contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Qualified Pension Plans.

•

Income Taxes: We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method recognizes the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities and requires an evaluation of the realizability of deferred income tax assets based on a more-likely-than-not criteria. We have valuation allowances for deferred tax assets primarily associated with foreign net operating loss carryforwards and foreign income tax credit carryforwards. Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. We believe that it is more-likely-than-not that future taxable income, based on enacted tax laws in effect as of March 31, 2012, will be sufficient to realize the recorded deferred tax assets net of existing valuation allowances.

•

Environmental Costs: Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued when it is probable that those costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated based on evaluations of currently available facts related to each site. The operation of manufacturing plants involves a high level of susceptibility in these areas, and requires subjective judgments by management in assessing environmental or occupational health and safety liabilities.

primary asset in the associated product groups is less than the carrying amount of the assets, the assets are considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. When fair values are not available, we estimate fair values using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to dispose.

• Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Actuarial Assumptions: We recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of benefit plans in our consolidated balance sheets. For purposes of calculating pension and postretirement medical benefit obligations and related costs, we use certain actuarial assumptions. Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors (retirement patterns, mortality and turnover), rate of compensation increase and the healthcare cost trend rate. See additional information contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Qualified Pension Plans. • Income Taxes: We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method recognizes the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities and requires an evaluation of asset realizability based on a more-likely-than-not criteria. We have valuation allowances for deferred tax assets primarily associated with foreign net operating loss carryforwards and foreign income tax credit carryforwards. Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. We believe that it is more-likely-than-not that future taxable income, based on enacted tax laws in effect as of September 30, 2011, will be sufficient to realize the recorded deferred tax assets net of existing valuation allowances. • Environmental Costs: Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued when it is probable that those costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated based on evaluations of currently available facts related to each site. The operation of manufacturing plants involves a high level of susceptibility in these areas, and requires subjective judgments by management in assessing environmental or occupational health and safety liabilities.

Summary of Consolidated Results

	Quarter Ended September 30,
	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2011						2010
	2012						2011
				% of Net						% of Net
	In Thousands			% of NetSales			In Thousands			% of NetSales
	In Thousands			Sales			In Thousands			Sales
Net sales	$	607,088			100.0		$	523,135			100.0
Net sales	$	604,426			100.0		$	518,233			100.0
Cost of sales		407,195			67.1			359,532			68.7
Cost of sales		412,927			68.3			352,096			67.9
Gross profit		199,893			32.9			163,603			31.3
Gross profit		191,499			31.7			166,137			32.1
Selling, general and administrative		115,564			19.0			104,101			19.9
Selling, general and administrative		110,389			18.3			97,470			18.8
Earnings from operations		84,329			13.9			59,502			11.4
Earnings from operations		81,110			13.4			68,667			13.3
Interest expense, net		(6,185	)		(1.0	)		(7,765	)		(1.5	)
Interest expense, net		(8,476	)		(1.4	)		(9,042	)		(1.8	)
Other (expense) income, net		(574	)		(0.1	)		(985	)		(0.2	)
Other (expense) income, net		1,387			0.2			(975	)		(0.2	)
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		77,570			12.8			50,752			9.7
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		74,021			12.2			58,650			11.3
Income tax provision		22,495			3.7			15,226			2.9
Income tax provision		19,688			3.2			16,056			3.1
Net earnings	$	55,075			9.1		$	35,526			6.8
Net earnings from continuing operations		54,333			9.0			42,594			8.2
Earnings per share:
Earnings from discontinued operations, net		—			—			1,510			0.3
Basic	$	1.06					$	0.69
Net earnings	$	54,333			9.0		$	44,104			8.5
Diluted	$	1.03					$	0.67
Basic earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	1.05					$	0.83
Discontinued operations		—						0.02
Net earnings	$	1.05					$	0.85
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	1.03					$	0.81
Discontinued operations		—						0.03
Net earnings	$	1.03					$	0.84

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011						2010
				% of Net						% of Net
	In Thousands			Sales			In Thousands			Sales
Net sales	$	1,693,903			100.0		$	1,471,842			100.0
Cost of sales		1,168,878			69.0			1,013,310			68.8
Gross profit		525,025			31.0			458,532			31.2
Selling, general and administrative		313,656			18.5			289,880			19.7
Earnings from operations		211,369			12.5			168,652			11.5
Interest expense, net		(24,200	)		(1.5	)		(26,315	)		(1.8	)
Other (expense) income, net		(315	)		—			90			—
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		186,854			11.0			142,427			9.7
Income tax provision		53,538			3.1			41,324			2.8
Net earnings from continuing operations		133,316			7.9			101,103			6.9
Earnings from discontinued operations, net		—			—			4,554			0.3
Net earnings	$	133,316			7.9		$	105,657			7.2
Basic earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	2.58					$	1.95
Discontinued operations		—						0.09
Net earnings	$	2.58					$	2.04
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	2.51					$	1.91
Discontinued operations		—						0.09
Net earnings	$	2.51					$	2.00

2012 Compared with 2011

2011 Compared with 2010

Overview

Net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and the first nine months~~ of ~~2011~~ 2012 increased from the prior-year ~~periods~~period primarily reflecting higher organic sales volumes in our Electrical ~~segment,~~and ~~the positive~~Steel ~~impact~~Structures ofsegments, the ~~2011~~positive ~~acquisition~~impact of ~~AmbiRad~~current ~~(July~~year ~~2011), the~~pricing ~~2010~~in ~~acquisitions~~our ofSteel JTStructures ~~Packard~~segment ~~(January~~and ~~2010),~~the ~~PMA~~impact ~~AG (“PMA”)~~of ~~(April~~the ~~2010) and~~July ~~Cable~~2011 ~~Management~~acquisition ~~Group,~~of AmbiRad ~~Ltd.~~Group (“~~CMG~~AmbiRad”) ~~(October~~in ~~2010),~~our ~~the~~HVAC ~~positive impact of current year price increases and a weaker U~~segment.~~S. dollar.~~

Earnings from operations, both in dollars and as a percentage of sales, increased from the respective prior-year ~~periods~~period. These improvements reflect the impact of increased organic sales volumes, aincreased ~~favorable shift in product mix in our Electrical segment, improved~~ manufacturing leverage from ~~increased~~ stronger production volumes, ~~especially in our Electrical segment,~~ and the impact of ~~acquisitions,~~the ~~which~~2011 ~~were~~AmbiRad ~~partially offset by lower segment earnings in our Steel Structures segment~~acquisition. The first ~~nine~~ ~~months~~quarter of ~~2011~~2012 included apre-tax ~~benefit~~merger ~~from~~related ~~legal settlements, in addition to~~ charges ~~related~~of toapproximately ~~facility~~$6 ~~consolidations~~million. The first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2010~~2011 included afacility ~~charge~~consolidations ~~for~~charges ~~environmental remediation~~of ~~and~~approximately ~~facility consolidation charges~~$3 million.

Net earnings in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 were $5455.31 million ($1.03 per diluted share) compared to net earnings of $4435.15 million ($0.8467 per diluted share) in the ~~third~~ first quarter of ~~2010~~2011. The ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2012 included ~~the favorable~~net ~~impact~~after oftax ~~the~~merger ~~release~~related ofcharges, aas described below of $13.5 8 million ($0.03 08 per diluted share). The first quarter of 2011 included net after tax ~~reserve~~facility consolidation charges, as described below of $2. 3 million ($0.04 per diluted share).

Net earnings in the first nine months of 2011 were $133.3 million ($2.51 per diluted share) compared to net earnings of $105.7 million ($2.00 per diluted share) in the prior-year period. Net earnings in the first nine months of 2011 included net after-tax facility consolidation charges in the first and second quarter of $2.3 million ($0.04 per diluted share) and $2.0 million ($0.04 per diluted share), respectively, and a net after-tax benefit from legal settlements in the second quarter of $3.0 million ($0.06 per diluted share). Net earnings in the first nine months of 2010 included net after-tax facility consolidation charges in the first quarter of $2.1 million ($0.04 per diluted share) and a net after-tax environmental remediation charge in the second quarter of $3.3 million ($0.06 per diluted share) in addition to the third quarter release of a tax reserve.

Net earnings in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 also reflect $1.5 million ($0.03 per diluted share) and $4.6 million ($0.09 per diluted share) of earnings from discontinued operations, respectively.

Net Sales and Gross Profit

Net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 were $~~604~~607.41 million, up 16.61%, from the prior-year period. Higher ~~For~~organic ~~the~~sales ~~first~~volumes ~~nine~~in ~~months of~~our ~~2011,~~Electrical ~~net~~and ~~sales~~Steel ~~were~~Structures ~~$1.7 billion,~~segments upand ~~15.1% from~~ the ~~prior-year~~ ~~period.~~positive ~~Higher~~impact ~~organic~~of ~~sales~~pricing ~~volumes~~ in our ~~Electrical~~ Steel Structures segment positively impacted year-over-year sales in ~~both 2011 periods~~2012. The ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ sales increase from the prior-year period ~~periods~~ attributable to the 2011 ~~and~~AmbiRad ~~2010~~acquisition ~~acquisitions~~ was approximately ~~$23 million~~ ~~and~~ $~~66 million, respectively~~12. ~~A weaker U.S.~~2 ~~dollar positively impacted sales by approximately $18~~ million ~~and $41 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, respectively, when compared to the prior-year periods~~. ~~Price had a positive impact on year-over-year consolidated sales for the third quarter and first nine months of 2011 primarily in our Electrical and Steel Structures segments.~~

~~Gross~~21 profit in the third quarter of 2011 was $191.5 million, or 31.7% of net sales, compared to $166.1 million or 32.1% of net sales, in the third quarter of 2010. Gross profit in the first nine

~~months~~Gross profit in the first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 was $~~525~~199.0 9 million, or 3132.09% of net sales, compared to $~~458~~163.56 million, or 31.23% of net sales, in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2010~~2011. The year-over-year ~~decreases~~ increase in gross profit as a percentage of sales ~~for both periods~~ reflects increased ~~facility~~manufacturing ~~consolidation~~leverage ~~charges~~from ~~and lower~~stronger ~~earnings~~production involumes ~~our Steel Structures segment due to project mix~~ and ~~a more competitive pricing environment. Gross profit as a percentage of sales in~~ the ~~third quarter of 2011 also reflects~~positive ~~the~~ impact ~~from~~of ~~acquisition~~more ~~accounting~~favorable ~~adjustments~~pricing ~~related to the AmbiRad acquisition. Gross profit~~ in ~~both~~our ~~2011~~Steel ~~periods benefited~~Structures ~~from the positive impact from acquisitions, actions taken to manage costs and improved manufacturing leverage from increased production volumes~~segment. Gross profit in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2011 ~~and 2010~~ included pre-tax charges for facility consolidations of $52.~~1 million~~4 ~~(first and second quarter) and $3.2~~ million ~~(first quarter), respectively~~.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 was $~~110~~115.46 million, or 18 19.30% of net sales, compared to $97104.51 million, or 1819.89% of net sales, in the prior-year period. SG&A expense ~~as a percentage of sales~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 ~~reflects~~includes ~~the leverage~~pre-tax ~~impact~~merger ofrelated ~~incremental~~charges ~~sales~~of ~~volumes~~approximately on$6 ~~our fixed cost base~~million. SG&A ~~expense~~in ~~for~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of 2011 also ~~reflects~~ ~~increased~~includes ~~corporate~~pre-tax ~~costs~~charges ~~associated with a revision~~ of an ~~estimate~~$0.8 million for ~~a legacy environmental remediation site.~~facility consolidations.

SG&A expense in the first nine months of 2011 was $313.7 million, or 18.5% of net sales, compared to $289.9 million, or 19.7% of net sales, in the prior-year period. SG&A expense as a percentage of sales in the first nine months of 2011 reflects the leverage impact of incremental sales volumes on our fixed cost base. In addition to the increase in corporate costs in the third quarter of 2011 noted above, SG&A expense in the first nine months of 2011 included a pre-tax benefit in the second quarter of $4.8 million from legal settlements and pre-tax charges in the first and second quarters of $1.2 million for facility consolidations. SG&A expense in the first nine months of 2010 included second quarter pre-tax charges of $5.3 million for environmental remediation.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net was $86.~~5 million for the third quarter of 2011 and $24.~~2 million for the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2011~~2012, ~~compared~~down to $91.~~0 million~~6 ~~and $26.3~~ million in from the ~~corresponding~~ prior-year ~~periods.~~period, ~~The~~primarily ~~decreases~~reflecting ~~in both periods reflect~~ lower average ~~debt levels in the current year periods in addition to increased~~ interest ~~income~~rates ~~associated with higher cash balances~~ in the current year. ~~Interest income included in interest expense, net was $0.7 million for the third quarter of 2011 and $0.5 million for the prior-year~~ period. Interest income included in interest expense, net was $21.1 million for the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2011~~2012 and $10.87 million for the prior-year period.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate from continuing operations in ~~the third~~ ~~quarter of 2011 was 26.6% compared to 27.4% in~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010. The effective tax rate from continuing operations for the first nine months~~ of ~~2011~~2012 was 2829.70% compared to 2930.0% in the first ~~nine months of 2010. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the third~~ quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of 2011 ~~primarily reflects the impact of shifts in the estimated global distribution of our current year annual pre-tax earnings~~. The effective rate for both periods ~~also~~ reflects benefits from our Puerto Rican manufacturing operations.

Net Earnings

Net earnings in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 were $5455.31 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, compared to net earnings of $4435.15 million, or $0.8467 per diluted share, in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011. Net earnings in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~ ~~included~~2012 ~~the~~include ~~favorable~~net ~~impact~~after-tax ofmerger ~~the~~related ~~release~~charges of a $13.5 8 million ($0.0308 per diluted share). Net earnings in the first quarter of 2011 included net after-tax ~~reserve~~facility consolidation charges of $2.3 million ($0.4 per diluted share).

~~Net~~22 earnings in the first nine months of 2011 were $133.3 million, or $2.51 per diluted share, compared to net earnings of $105.7 million, or $2.00 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2010. Net earnings in the first nine months of 2011 included first and second quarter net after-tax facility consolidation charges of $2.3 million ($0.04 per diluted share) and $2.0 million ($0.04 per diluted share), respectively, and a net after-tax benefit from legal settlements in the second quarter of $3.0 million ($0.06 per diluted share). Net earnings in the first nine months of 2010 included net after-tax facility consolidation charges in the first quarter of $2.1 million ($0.04 per diluted share) and a net after-tax environmental remediation charge in the second quarter of $3.3 million ($0.06 per diluted share) in addition to the third quarter release of a tax reserve.

Summary of Segment Results

Net Sales

	Quarter Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2011					2010					2011					2010
	2012					2011
	In			% of Net		In			% of Net		In			% of Net		In			% of Net
	In Thousands			% of NetSales		In Thousands			% of NetSales
	Thousands			Sales		Thousands			Sales		Thousands			Sales		Thousands			Sales
Electrical	$	483,964			79.7	$	443,520			84.8
Electrical	$	500,693			82.8	$	439,172			84.8	$	1,427,992			84.3	$	1,235,759			84.0
Steel Structures		82,108			13.5		50,945			9.7
Steel Structures		66,893			11.1		57,232			11.0		176,604			10.4		166,753			11.3
HVAC		41,016			6.8		28,670			5.5
HVAC		36,840			6.1		21,829			4.2		89,307			5.3		69,330			4.7
	$	607,088			100.0	$	523,135			100.0
	$	604,426			100.0	$	518,233			100.0	$	1,693,903			100.0	$	1,471,842			100.0
Segment Earnings
	Quarter Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010					2011					2010
	In			% of Net		In			% of Net		In			% of Net		In			% of Net
	Thousands			Sales		Thousands			Sales		Thousands			Sales		Thousands			Sales
Electrical	$	105,165			21.0	$	89,588			20.4	$	285,281			20.0	$	237,786			19.2
Steel Structures		10,497			15.7		11,092			19.4		19,078			10.8		29,027			17.4
HVAC		3,024			8.2		2,868			13.1		10,047			11.2		9,466			13.7
Segment earnings		118,686			19.6		103,548			20.0		314,406			18.6		276,279			18.8
Corporate expense		(13,709	)				(12,615	)				(30,424	)				(40,205	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(21,426	)				(20,054	)				(63,386	)				(58,775	)
Share-based compensation expense		(2,441	)				(2,212	)				(9,227	)				(8,647	)
Interest expense, net		(8,476	)				(9,042	)				(24,200	)				(26,315	)
Other (expense) income, net		1,387					(975	)				(315	)				90
Earnings before income taxes	$	74,021				$	58,650				$	186,854				$	142,427

Segment Earnings


	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2012					2011
	In Thousands			% of Net Sales		In Thousands			% of Net Sales
Electrical	$	100,422			20.7	$	86,936			19.6
Steel Structures		19,389			23.6		4,292			8.4
HVAC		7,664			18.7		4,562			15.9

Segment earnings		127,475			21.0		95,790			18.3
Corporate expense		(19,710	)				(11,509	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(20,220	)				(21,037	)
Share-based compensation expense		(3,216	)				(3,742	)
Interest expense, net		(6,185	)				(7,765	)
Other (expense) income, net		(574	)				(985	)

Earnings before income taxes	$	77,570				$	50,752

We have three reportable segments: Electrical, Steel Structures and HVAC. We evaluate our business segments primarily on the basis of segment earnings, with segment earnings defined as earnings before corporate expense, depreciation and amortization expense, share-based compensation expense, interest, income taxes and certain other items.

Our consolidated segment earnings are significantly influenced by the operating performance of our Electrical segment that accounts for a substantial portion of our consolidated net sales and consolidated segment earnings during the periods presented.

Electrical Segment

Electrical segment net sales in the ~~third~~ first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 were $~~501~~484.0 million, up $6140.54 million, or 149.01%, from the ~~third~~ ~~quarter of 2010. Electrical segment net sales in the~~ first ~~nine~~ ~~months~~quarter of 2011 ~~were $1~~.~~4 billion,~~ ~~up $192.2 million,~~Increased ororganic ~~15.6%,~~sales ~~from the prior-year period. Increased~~ volumes, ~~primarily for our industrial and utility distribution products,~~ positively impacted year-over-year ~~sales.~~ ~~The third quarter and first nine months~~ sales ~~increases from the prior-year periods attributable to the 2010 acquisitions were approximately $11 million and $54 million, respectively~~. Net sales benefited from a weaker U.S. dollar, which positively impacted sales by approximately $17 million in the third quarter of 2011 and approximately $40 million in the first nine months of 2011. Price increases, primarily to offset rising raw material costs, positively impacted net sales when compared to the respective prior-year periods.

Electrical segment earnings in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 were ~~$105.2 million,~~ up $15100.~~6 million, or 17.~~4~~%, from the third quarter of 2010. Electrical segment earnings in the first nine months of 2011 were $285.3~~ million, up $4713.5 million, or 2015.05%, from the ~~prior-year period.~~first ~~Segment earnings as a percentage of sales increased to 21.0% in the third~~ quarter of 2011 ~~compared to 20~~.4% ~~in the prior-year period.~~ Segment earnings as a percentage of sales increased to 20.07% in the first nine months of 2011 compared to 19.2% in the prior-year period. Year-over-year segment earnings for both periods reflect the contribution from 2010 acquisitions, improved product mix, manufacturing leverage from increased volume, and the benefits of current- and prior-year right-sizing actions. Segment earnings in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010 also reflect pre-tax facility consolidation charges of $4.8 million (first and second quarter) and $3.2 million (first quarter), respectively.

the first quarter of 2012 compared to 19.6% in the prior-year period. Segment earnings in the first quarter of 2011 reflect pre-tax facility consolidation charges of $2.5 million. Year-over-year segment earnings reflect improved manufacturing leverage from increased volumes, a favorable product and geographic mix and the benefits of prior-year right-sizing actions.

Steel Structures Segment

Net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 in our Steel Structures segment were $6682.91 million, up $931.72 million, or 1661.92%, from the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010. Net sales in the first nine months of~~ 2011 ~~were $176~~.~~6 million,~~ ~~up $9.9 million, or 5.9%, from the prior-year period.~~ The net sales increase in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and~~reflects ~~first~~increased ~~nine~~organic ~~months~~sales ofvolumes, ~~2011 primarily reflects~~ the positive price impact from the pass-through of higher year-over-year plate steel costs and a more favorable pricing environment.

Steel Structures segment ~~earnings in the third quarter of 2011~~ ~~were $10.5 million, down $0.6 million, or 5.4%, from the prior-year period. Segment~~ earnings in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2011~~2012 were $19.14 million, ~~down~~up $915.91 million, or 34 351.38%, from the prior-year period. The ~~decrease~~increase in year-over-year segment earnings in dollars and as a percentage of sales in ~~both 2011~~2012 ~~periods~~ reflects ~~declines~~the inincrease in project margins due to improved project mix and a more ~~competitive~~favorable pricing environment.

HVAC Segment

Net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 in our HVAC segment were $3641.8 0 million, up $1512.03 million, or 6843.81%, from the ~~third~~ ~~quarter of 2010. Net sales in the~~ first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of 2011 ~~in our HVAC segment were $89~~.~~3 million,~~ ~~up $20.0 million, or 28.8%, from the prior-year period.~~ The ~~third~~ ~~quarter and~~ first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ sales increase from the prior-year ~~periods~~period attributable to the July 2011 acquisition of AmbiRad was approximately $12.2 million. ~~Additionally, increased volumes and favorable foreign currency positively impacted year-over-year sales.~~

HVAC segment earnings in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 were $37.07 million, up $03.21 million, or 568.40%, from the ~~third~~ first quarter of ~~2010~~2011. ~~Segment~~Increased ~~earnings~~year-over-year insegment ~~the~~earnings ~~first~~as ~~nine~~a ~~months~~percentage of ~~2011~~sales ~~were~~in ~~$10.0 million,~~2012 upreflect ~~$0.6 million,~~the or2011 ~~6.1%, from~~acquisition ~~the~~of ~~prior-year period~~AmbiRad. ~~Lower year-over-year segment~~Segment earnings asin athe ~~percentage~~first quarter of ~~sales~~2011 inreflect ~~both~~a ~~2011~~pre-tax ~~periods reflect~~facility ~~the~~consolidation ~~acquisition~~charge ~~accounting~~of ~~adjustments~~ $0.7 million.

related to the AmbiRad acquisition partially offset by improved mix and manufacturing leverage from increased volume. Segment earnings in the first nine months of 2011 also reflect pre-tax facility consolidation charges in the first and second quarter of $1.5 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had cash and cash equivalents of ~~approximately~~ approximately $~~465~~598 million and $~~455~~552 million at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~ 2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, respectively.

The following table reflects the primary category totals in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

	Nine Months Ended
	Quarter EndedMarch 31,
	September 30,
	2012			2011
	2011			2010
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	~~71,384~~600		$	~~144~~(37,~~920~~206	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(5710,~~901~~315	)		(~~121~~12,~~126~~109	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		244,~~679~~011			~~(72~~19,~~841~~766	)
Effect of exchange-rate changes on cash		(511,~~911~~701	)		58,~~655~~634
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	1045,~~251~~997		$	(4320,~~392~~915	)

Operating Activities

~~Operating~~Cash provided by operating activities in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2011~~2012 included net earnings of $~~133~~55.31 million, depreciation and amortization of $6320.42 million and share-based compensation expense of $93.2 million, which were offset by a negative $77.7 million net change in working capital (accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable)~~, as well as accrued liabilities, of $121~~.~~6 million.~~ Additionally, operating activities for the first nine months of 2011 reflect increased cash income taxes resulting from the tax payment associated with the 2010 divestiture of the communications products business and payment of an assessment from a Canada Revenue Agency audit.

~~Operating~~Cash provided by operating activities in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2010~~2011 included net earnings of $~~105~~35.7 5 million, depreciation and ~~amortization~~ amortization of $6021.0 million and share-based compensation expense of $83.7 million, which was offset by a negative $84.4 Amillion net change in working capital (accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable)~~, which negatively impacted cash in the first nine months of 2010, was partially offset by higher accrued liabilities, including benefit plan liabilities, and income taxes payable~~.

Investing Activities

~~Investing~~During ~~activities in~~ the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2011~~2012 ~~included approximately~~and ~~$30 million to acquire AmbiRad. During the first nine months of~~ 2011, we had capital expenditures to support our ongoing business plans totaling $3010.85 million and $12. 1 million respectively. We expect capital expenditures to be in the $~~55-~~65–$60 70 million range for the full year ~~2011~~2012. ~~Investing~~Capital ~~activities~~expenditures in the first ~~nine~~ ~~months~~quarter of ~~2010~~2012 ~~included~~includes ~~approximately~~capacity ~~$78 million~~expansion ~~to acquire~~for ~~PMA~~a ~~(cash~~Steel ~~portion~~Structures ~~of the purchase price) and approximately $21 million to acquire JT Packard~~facility. ~~During the first nine months of 2010, we also had capital expenditures to support our ongoing business plans totaling $22.3 million.~~

Financing Activities

Financing activities in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of 2012 ~~2011~~ included ~~672,257~~ approximately 1.1 million stock options totaling $35.7 million (exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $3532.5584 per share) ~~totaling $23.9 million~~ and ~~the repurchase~~a ofrelated ~~500,000~~$8.4 ~~common~~million ~~shares~~tax ~~for $21~~benefit.~~2 million.~~ Financing activities in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2010~~2011 included ~~253,074~~approximately 0.5 million stock options exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $2036.3922 per share totaling $518.25 million~~, the repurchase of 1,075,000 common shares for $42~~.~~9 million~~ ~~and repayment of approximately $36 million to retire debt assumed as part of the PMA acquisition.~~

Credit Facilities

The Corporation has an unsecured, senior credit facility (“new revolving credit facility”) with total availability of $500 million and a five-year term expiring in August 2016. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, ~~the Corporation~~no ~~had~~borrowings were outstanding ~~$250 million~~under ~~of 5~~this facility.~~625% Senior~~ ~~Notes~~Under the ~~due~~new ~~2021.~~revolving ~~The~~credit ~~indentures~~facility ~~underlying~~agreement, the ~~unsecured~~ ~~notes~~Corporation ~~contain~~will ~~standard~~select ~~covenants~~an ~~such~~interest asrate ~~restrictions~~ at the time of its initial draw reflecting LIBOR plus a margin based on ~~mergers,~~the ~~liens~~Corporation’s credit rating or the highest rate based on ~~certain~~several ~~property~~other benchmark rates, ~~sale-leaseback~~including: of(i) JPMorgan ~~certain property~~Chase ~~and~~Bank’s ~~funded~~New ~~debt~~York ~~for~~Prime ~~certain~~rate, ~~subsidiaries.~~(ii) the ~~The indentures~~federal ~~also~~funds ~~include~~effective ~~standard~~rate, ~~events~~or of(iii) an ~~default~~adjusted ~~such~~LIBOR ~~as covenant~~rate, ~~default~~plus ~~and~~a ~~cross-acceleration~~margin based on our credit rating.

Fees to access the facility and letters of credit are based on a pricing grid related to the Corporation’s debt ratings with Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch during the term of the facility.

The Corporation’s new revolving credit facility requires that it maintain:

	•	a maximum leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1.00; and
	•	a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00.

•

a maximum leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1.00; and

~~The~~• ~~new~~a ~~revolving~~minimum ~~credit~~interest ~~facility~~coverage ~~also~~ratio ~~contains~~of ~~customary covenants~~3.00 ~~that could restrict the Corporation’s ability~~ to~~: incur~~ ~~additional indebtedness; grant liens; make investments, loans, or guarantees; declare dividends; or repurchase company stock~~1. 00.

~~Outstanding~~25 letters of credit, which reduced availability under the new revolving credit facility, amounted to $4.7 million at September 30, 2011. The letters of credit relate primarily to environmental assurances.

Concurrent to entering into the new revolving credit facility, the Corporation amended its existing unsecured, senior credit facility (“existing revolving credit facility”) to reduce the total availability under this facility from $750 million to the $325 million of debt outstanding plus the letters of credit outstanding under the facility at the time of the amendment. Letters of credit under this facility at September 30, 2011 amounted to $17.6 million. The letters of credit relate primarily

toThe ~~third-party~~new ~~insurance~~revolving ~~claims~~credit ~~processing.~~facility Asalso ~~borrowings~~contains ~~and letters~~customary ofcovenants ~~credit~~that ~~under~~could restrict the Corporation’s ~~facility~~ability ~~are~~to: ~~reduced~~incur additional indebtedness; grant liens; make investments, ~~the~~loans, ~~amount~~or ~~of the~~guarantees; ~~facility~~declare ~~will~~dividends; ~~decrease~~or repurchase company stock.

~~The~~Outstanding ~~amendment~~letters toof ~~the existing revolving~~ credit, ~~facility conformed~~which ~~all~~reduced ~~covenants~~availability ~~and~~under ~~obligations to those found in~~ the new revolving credit facility, ~~except~~amounted ~~those related~~ to ~~interest on borrowings and fees, which remain unchanged~~$17. ~~At September~~7 ~~30,~~million ~~2011~~at ~~and December~~March 31, ~~2010, $325 million was outstanding under this facility~~2012. The ~~existing~~ ~~revolving~~letters of credit ~~facility~~relate ~~has~~primarily ~~a five~~to third-~~year~~party ~~term~~insurance ~~expiring October 2012~~claims.

Other Credit Facilities

The Corporation has a EUR 10 million (approximately US$13.63 million) committed revolving credit facility with a ~~European~~ European bank. The Corporation pays an annual commitment fee of 20 basis points on the undrawn balance to maintain this facility. This credit facility contains standard covenants and events of default such as covenant default and cross-default. ~~This~~ This facility has an indefinite maturity, and no borrowings were outstanding as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~ 2011. Outstanding letters of credit which reduced availability under the European facility amounted to EUR 01.98 million (approximately US$1.2.4 million) at ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2011~~2012.

The Corporation has a CAN 3010 million (approximately US$2910.41 million) committed revolving credit facility with a Canadian bank. The Corporation pays an annual commitment fee of ~~12.5~~ 20 basis points on the undrawn balance to maintain this facility. This credit facility contains standard covenants ~~and~~ and events of default such as covenant default and cross-default. This facility matures in December ~~2011~~2016, and no borrowings were outstanding as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~ 2011.

Other Letters of Credit

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, the Corporation also had letters of credit in addition to those discussed above that do not reduce availability under the Corporation’s credit facilities. The Corporation had ~~approximately~~ $1921.5 million of such additional letters of credit that relate primarily to ~~environmental~~ ~~assurances,~~ third-party insurance claims processing, performance bonds, performance guarantees and acquisition obligations.

Compliance and Availability

We are in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in our credit facilities. However, if we fail to be in ~~compliance~~ compliance with the financial or other covenants of our credit agreements, then the credit agreements could be terminated, any outstanding borrowings under the agreements could be accelerated and immediately due, and we could have difficulty obtaining immediate credit availability to repay the accelerated obligations and in obtaining credit facilities in the future. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, the aggregate availability of funds under our credit facilities is approximately $~~537~~503 million, ~~after~~ after deducting outstanding letters of credit. Availability is subject to the satisfaction of various covenants and conditions to borrowing.

Credit Ratings

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, we had investment grade credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s (BBB rating), Moody’s Investor Service (Baa2 rating) and Fitch Ratings (BBB rating) on our senior unsecured debt. Should these credit ratings drop, repayment under our credit facilities and securities will not be accelerated; however, our credit costs may increase. Similarly, if our credit ratings improve, we could potentially have a decrease in our credit costs. The maturity of any of our debt securities does not accelerate in the event of a credit downgrade.

Debt Securities

Thomas & Betts had the following unsecured debt securities outstanding as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012:

Issue Date

Amount

Interest Rate

Interest Payable

Maturity Date

November 2009

$250.0 million

5.625%

May 15 and November 15

November 2021

The indentures underlying the unsecured debt securities contain standard covenants such as restrictions on mergers, liens on certain property, sale-leaseback of certain property and funded debt for certain subsidiaries. The indentures also include standard events of default such as covenant default and cross-acceleration. We are in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in the indentures.

Qualified Pension Plans

Contributions to our qualified pension plans during the first ~~nine~~ ~~months~~quarter of ~~2011~~2012 were not significant. We expect required contributions to our qualified pension plans in ~~2011~~2012 to be minimal.

Acquisitions

In July 2011, the Corporation acquired AmbiRad, a leading manufacturer of specialized commercial and industrial heating and ventilation products, which are sold throughout Europe and exported to other global markets, for approximately $30 million.

In April 2010, the Corporation acquired PMA, a leading European manufacturer of technologically advanced cable protection systems, for approximately $114 million including cash used in the acquisition of approximately $78 million and cash used to retire debt assumed of approximately $36 million.

In January 2010, the Corporation acquired JT Packard, the nation’s largest independent service provider for critical power equipment used by industrial and commercial enterprises in a broad array of markets, for approximately $21 million.

Other

InThe ~~September~~merger ~~2010,~~agreement ~~the~~between ~~Corporation’s~~Thomas ~~Board~~and ofBetts ~~Directors approved a share repurchase plan that authorized the~~ Corporation ~~to buy up to 3~~,~~000,000~~ ofABB ~~its~~Ltd ~~common~~and ~~shares.~~a ~~To-date~~wholly ~~through September 30,~~owned ~~2011,~~subsidiary ~~the~~of ~~Corporation~~ABB ~~repurchased,~~Ltd ~~with available~~imposes ~~cash~~certain ~~resources, 1,000,000 common shares through~~restrictions ~~open-market~~on ~~transactions~~us ~~under~~including ~~this plan. During~~ the ~~third quarter~~ability ~~and~~to ~~first~~pay ~~nine months of 2011~~dividends, ~~the~~prepay ~~Corporation repurchased~~debt, ~~with~~repurchase ~~available cash resources~~shares, ~~500,000~~dispose ~~common shares through open-market transactions under this plan. The timing~~ of ~~future~~assets ~~repurchases,~~and ifsettle ~~any,~~pending ~~will~~or ~~depend~~threatened ~~upon a variety of factors~~lawsuits, ~~including~~among ~~market~~other ~~conditions~~actions. ~~This authorization expires in December 2012.~~

We do not currently pay cash dividends. Future decisions concerning the payment of cash dividends on the common stock will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, strategic investment opportunities, continued compliance with credit facilities and other factors that the Board of Directors may consider relevant.

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, we have approximately $~~465~~598 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $~~537~~503 million of aggregate availability under our credit facilities. We renewed our effective universal shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~December~~November 34, ~~2008~~2011, utilizing the well-known seasoned issuer (WKSI) process. The registration permits ~~us to issue common stock, preferred stock and debt securities. The registration is effective~~

31 27

us to issue common stock, preferred stock and debt securities. The registration is effective for a period of three years from the date of filing. We continue to have cash requirements to, among other things, support working capital and capital expenditure needs, service debt and fund our retirement plans as required. We generally intend to use available cash and internally generated funds to meet these cash requirements and may borrow under existing credit facilities or access the capital markets as needed for liquidity. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to satisfy both short-term and long-term requirements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Refer to Note 1513 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our guarantee and indemnification arrangements.

32 28

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk and Financial Instruments

Thomas & Betts is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and raw material prices, among others. At times, we may enter into various derivative instruments to manage certain of these risks. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

For the period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, the Corporation has not experienced any material changes since December 31, ~~2010~~ 2011 in market risk that affect the quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented in our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation is made known to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer who certify the Corporation’s financial reports.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, and they have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective.

(b)

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no significant changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

33 29

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

See Note 1513, “Contingencies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference. See also Item 3. “Legal Proceedings,” in the Corporation’s ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously set forth in our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K ~~under~~ under Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 2.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table reflects activity related to equity securities purchased by the Corporation during the quarter ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2011:~~ 2012:

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Total Number

Maximum

Period

TotalNumber ofCommonSharesPurchased

AveragePrice PaidperCommonShare

Total Numberof CommonSharesPurchasedas Part ofPubliclyAnnouncedPlans

MaximumNumberof CommonShares thatMay Yet BePurchasedUnderthe Plans

of Common

Number

of Common

Total

Average

Purchased

Shares that

Number of

Price Paid

as Part of

May Yet Be

Common

per

Publicly

Purchased

Common

Announced

Under

Period

Purchased

Plans

the Plans

September 2010 Plan (3,000,000 common shares authorized)

September 8, 2011 to September 15, 2011

500,000

42.29

500,000

2,000,000

Total for the quarter ended March 31, 2012

—

1,500,000

Total for the quarter ended September 30, 2011

500,000

42.29

500,000

2,000,000

Item 5.

Other Information

Item 6.

Exhibits

The Exhibit Index that follows the signature page of this Report is incorporated herein by reference.

34 30

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Corporation has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

~~Thomas~~ THOMAS & ~~Betts Corporation~~ BETTS CORPORATION (Registrant) By: /s/ WILLIAM E. WEAVER, JR. William E. Weaver, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

ByDate: ~~/s/ William E. Weaver~~May 7, ~~Jr.~~2012

~~William~~31 ~~E. Weaver, Jr.~~

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: October 28, 2011

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit	~~Description of Exhibit~~
	10	.1	Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated August 11, 2011, among Thomas & Betts Corporation, as Borrower, the Lenders party hereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., Regions Bank and SunTrust Bank as Co-Syndication Agents (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 29, 2012, among Thomas & Betts Corporation, ABB Ltd and Edison Acquisition Corporation (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.2	Credit Agreement dated August 11, 2011, among Thomas & Betts Corporation, as Borrower, the Lenders party hereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bank of America, N.A. as Co-Syndication Agents (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
12		Statement re Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
	12		Statement re Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Under Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
	31	.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Under Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Under Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
	31	.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Under Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document
	32	.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and not filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document
	32	.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and not filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document
101*		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
	101*		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data included in Exhibit 101 is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections

36 32

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · THOMAS & BETTS CORP