UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

September 30, 2011 For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 333-147828

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

71-1018770, 20-8650498

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

10511 East Central, Wichita, Kansas 67206

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(316) 676-7111

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

No membership interests in Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC, and no common shares of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company are held by non-affiliates.

Table of Contents

Part I – Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2627
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3334
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3334
Part II – Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3334
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3435
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3436
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3436
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	3436
Item 5.	Other Information	3436
Item 6.	Exhibits	3536
Signatures		3637

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited)

(In millions)

	June 30,2011			December 31,2010
	September 30,2011			December 31,2010
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~143~~146.27		$	422.8
Accounts receivable, net		~~138~~99.81			121.0
Unbilled revenue		3035.95			34.4
Inventories		1,~~172~~318.47			1,059.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2925.03			30.7
Total current assets		1,~~514~~625.3			1,668.8
Property, plant and equipment, net		~~453~~442.52			482.2
Goodwill		259.5			259.5
Intangible assets, net		~~752~~745.69			759.1
Other assets, net		3837.50			42.2
Total assets	$	3,~~018~~109.49		$	3,211.8
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt	$	69.5		$	74.6
Notes payable, revolver and current portion of long-term debt	$	117.2		$	74.6
Advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred		~~224~~267.09			266.0
Accounts payable		~~277~~328.42			221.1
Accrued salaries and wages		4756.2			65.0
Accrued interest payable		1429.91			14.7
Other accrued expenses		242.7			291.6
Current deferred income tax liability, net		15.9			0.4
Total current liabilities		875.7			933.0
Other accrued expenses		225.6			291.2
Long-term debt		2,026.9			2,055.1
Total current liabilities		1,040.1			933.0
Accrued pension benefits		338.6			349.4
Long-term debt		2,027.5			2,055.1
Other long-term liabilities		86.2			75.1
Accrued pension benefits		329.9			349.4
Noncurrent deferred income tax liability, net		8.3			13.6
Other long-term liabilities		95.6			75.1
Total liabilities		3,335.7			3,426.2
Noncurrent deferred income tax liability, net		—			13.6
Total liabilities		3,493.1			3,426.2
Equity:
Paid-in capital		1,006.17			1,004.5
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(~~289~~268.01	)		(310.4	)
Retained deficit		(1,~~038~~126.0	)		(912.0	)
Total deficit attributable to parent company		(~~320~~387.94	)		(217.9	)
Noncontrolling interest		34.62			3.5
Total deficit		(~~317~~383.32	)		(214.4	)
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,~~018~~109.49		$	3,211.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In millions)

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,2011			June 27,2010			June 30,2011			June 27,2010
	September 30,2011			September 30,2010			September 30,2011			September 30,2010
Sales:
Aircraft and parts	$	~~536~~470.31		$	~~603~~552.71		$	1,~~053~~523.23		$	1,~~134~~686.45
Services		4548.47			3542.6			86135.96			73115.17
Total sales		~~581~~518.78			~~639~~594.37			1,~~140~~658.19			1,~~207~~802.52
Cost of sales:
Aircraft and parts		~~464~~427.1			~~536~~547.48			~~934~~1,361.67			1,~~016~~564.20
Services		3840.2			3035.47			73113.68			6298.96
Total cost of sales		~~502~~467.3			~~566~~583.85			1,~~008~~475.25			1,~~079~~662.16
Gross profit		7951.45			7211.52			~~131~~183.94			~~128~~139.46
Restructuring		2.3.6			31.78			37.84			57.64
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6867.0			64.91			~~134~~201.7			~~121~~185.45
Research and development expenses		2823.71			2426.67			5074.90			4773.29
Operating loss		(1942.62	)		(2081.74	)		(5799.57	)		(45127.82	)
Interest expense		32.93			3637.85			69102.81			73110.16
Interest income		~~(0.1~~—	)		(0.12	)		(0.3	)		(0.24	)
Other income, net		—			(1.0	)		(0.8	)		(1.3	)
Other expense (income), net		0.3			(1.0	)		(0.5	)		(2.3	)
Nonoperating expense, net		32.86			3536.73			68101.73			71107.69
Loss before taxes		(5274.48	)		(56117.47	)		(~~126~~201.20	)		(~~117~~235.41	)
Income taxes provision (benefit)		(1.2	)		0.2			(0.2	)		2.6
Income taxes provision		13.2			0.9			13.0			3.5
Net loss		(5188.20	)		(56118.6	)		(~~126~~214.0	)		(~~120~~238.06	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		0.16			0.21			0.17			0.34
Net loss attributable to parent company	$	(5188.36	)	$	(56118.87	)	$	(~~126~~214.17	)	$	(~~120~~239.30	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(In millions)

	Paid-inCapital		RetainedEarnings(Deficit)			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss)			Non-controllingInterest			TotalEquity			TotalComprehensiveIncome (Loss)Attributableto HBAC(a)			ComprehensiveIncomeAttributable toNoncontrollingInterest
Balance at January 1, 2010	$	1,000.1	$	(607.7	)	$	(274.1	)	$	3.9		$	122.2
Stock-based compensation		2.3.4											2.3.4
Noncontrolling interest activity				0.34						(1.0	)		(0.76	)
Net (loss) income				(~~120~~239.30	)					0.34			(~~120~~238.06	)	$	(~~120~~239.30	)	$	0.34
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost, net of tax of $0							711.76						711.76			711.76
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $0							(0.5	)					(0.5	)		(0.5	)
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $1.2							1.9						1.9			1.9
Reclassifications of unrealized losses due to cash flow hedge maturities, net of tax of $0							914.25						914.25			914.25
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $0							(0.91	)					(0.91	)		(0.91	)
Balance at June 27, 2010	$	1,002.4	$	(727.7	)	$	(258.6	)	$	3.2		$	19.3		$	(104.8	)	$	0.3
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	1,003.5	$	(846.3	)	$	(246.2	)	$	3.3		$	(85.7	)	$	(211.1	)	$	0.4
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	1,004.5	$	(912.0	)	$	(310.4	)	$	3.5		$	(214.4	)
Stock-based compensation		12.62											12.62
Noncontrolling interest activity				0.17									0.17
Net (loss) income				(~~126~~214.17	)					0.17			(~~126~~214.0	)	$	(~~126~~214.17	)	$	0.17
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost, net of tax of $5.5							8.5						8.5			8.5
Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost, net of tax of $6.7							14.2						14.2			14.2
Realized net curtailment loss, net of tax of $1.1							1.8						1.8			1.8
Realized net curtailment loss, net of tax of $1.2							2.7						2.7			2.7
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $0							45.69						45.69			45.69
Reclassification of unrealized losses due to cash flow hedge maturities, net of tax of $0							5.6						5.6			5.6
Reclassification of unrealized losses due to cash flow hedge maturities, net of tax of $(14.9)							20.5						20.5			20.5
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $0.6							0.9						0.9			0.9
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $0.7							(1.0	)					(1.0	)		(1.0	)
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	1,006.1	$	(1,038.0	)	$	(289.0	)	$	3.6		$	(317.3	)	$	(104.7	)	$	0.1
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	1,006.7	$	(1,126.0	)	$	(268.1	)	$	4.2		$	(383.2	)	$	(172.4	)	$	0.7

(a)	Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to HBAC was $(67.7) million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $(106.3) million for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In millions)

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,2011			June 27,2010
	September 30,2011			September 30,2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(~~126~~214.0	)	$	(~~120~~238.06	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		4768.09			4366.94
Amortization of intangible assets		1928.58			2333.35
Amortization of debt issuance costs		57.25			4.7.0
Amortization of original issue discount		1.39			1.17
Stock-based compensation		12.62			2.3.4
Change in current and deferred income taxes		23.48			23.12
Gain (loss) on sale of fixed assets		0.3			(1.5	)
Loss (gain) on sale of fixed assets		0.3			(1.5	)
Noncash interest expense		—			6.9
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		~~(17~~21.89	)		(822.84	)
Unbilled revenue, advanced payments and billings in excess of costs incurred		~~(38~~0.58	)		(810.03	)
Inventories		(29135.43	)		7934.34
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1.91	)		(86.09	)
Accounts payable		56107.31			3248.20
Accrued salaries and wages		(178.8	)		12.85
Other accrued expenses		(5551.23	)		(544.57	)
Pension and other changes, net		2043.1			236.84
Income taxes payable		21.50			(1.1	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(~~130~~121.40	)		7952.57
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(1829.73	)		(1323.53	)
Additions to computer software		(1315.06	)		(14.50	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		0.2			4.7
Net cash used in investing activities		(3144.57	)		(1022.36	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of notes payable		(73115.29	)		(92100.1	)
Payment of term loan		(44.5	)		(311.83	)
Payment of revolving credit facility		—			(235.0	)
Utilization of revolving credit facility		50.0			(235.0	)
Proceeds from IRB funding		—			0.1
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~117~~110.74	)		(~~330~~346.83	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(~~279~~276.61	)		(~~261~~316.62	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		422.8			568.8
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	~~143~~146.27		$	~~307~~252.26
Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash paid for interest	$	6176.07		$	3871.51
Cash paid for income taxes	$	1.03		$	12.31
Net noncash transfers to property, plant and equipment from inventory	$	—		$	7.9
Net noncash transfers from property, plant and equipment to prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	—		$	(24.96	)
Inventories acquired through issuance of notes	$	83123.15		$	87109.28

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Background and Basis of Interim Presentation

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (“HBAC”) is engaged in the design, development, manufacturing, marketing, selling and servicing of business and general aviation, training, light attack and special mission aircraft. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HBAC and its subsidiaries, which are referred to by the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company” and “Hawker Beechcraft”.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information but do not include all disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The year-end condensed consolidated statement of financial position was derived from audited financial statements, however, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted. Reclassifications of certain comparative data have been made to provide consistency with the current presentation. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In the opinion of HBAC management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of financial statements for the interim periods in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The amortization of prior service cost and actuarial losses associated with our pension and post-retirement obligations was incorrectly recorded as a change in Accrued pension benefits and should have been recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income for each of the first three quarters of 2010. We applied the appropriate accounting treatment related to the amortization of our prior service cost and actuarial losses within our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 and within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2011. We have quantitatively and qualitatively assessed the impact of the error correction on our consolidated financial statements for each of the quarterly and year-to-date periods ended March 28, 2010, June 27, 2010 and September 30, 2010, and concluded that none of these periods were materially misstated. The following table illustrates the quantitative impact on comprehensive loss for each of the affected prior quarterly periods:

	Three months endedMarch 28, 2010						Six months endedJune 27, 2010						Nine months endedSeptember 30, 2010
	As previouslypresented			As revised(a)			As previouslypresented			As revised(a)			As previouslypresented			As revised(a)
Comprehensive loss	$	(69.2	)	$	(65.4	)	$	(121.7	)	$	(114.0	)	$	(237.2	)	$	(225.6	)
(a) The amounts have been further revised in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on August 9, 2011, to be $(61.9) million for the three months ended March 28, 2010, $(104.8) million for the six months ended June 27, 2010, and $(211.0) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
(a) The amounts have been further revised in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on August 9, 2011, to be $(61.9) million for the three months ended March 28, 2010, $(104.8) million for the six months ended June 27, 2010, and $(211.1) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This revision was related to certain components of accumulated other comprehensive income not carried forward into Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to HBAC. This error had no impact on the condensed consolidated statement of financial position, condensed consolidated statement of operations or condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

There have been no substantial changes in our significant accounting policies since our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Refer to the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new standards in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) topic on Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. These standards require, among other changes, disclosure of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within the Level 3 fair value measurements effective beginning the first quarter of 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Other new pronouncements issued but not effective until after June 30, 2011, are not expected to have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within the Level 3 fair value measurements effective beginning the first quarter of 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2011, the FASB issued an update in the ASC topic on Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. This update provides, among other changes, an option to first assess qualitative factors in the determination of goodwill impairment and whether or not the two-step impairment test is required. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and is not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Other new pronouncements issued but not effective until after September 30, 2011, are not expected to have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

4. Inventories

The following table summarizes the components of Inventories:

(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011		December 31,2010
Materials and purchased parts	$	~~215~~254.15	$	231.1
Work in process		~~808~~878.42		663.5
Finished goods		~~148~~186.90		165.3
Total	$	1,~~172~~318.47	$	1,059.9

5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Interest Rate Swap

We entered into an interest rate swap agreement in April 2007 to effectively convert a portion of our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The notional amount of this swap is $150.0 million and it matures on December 31, 2011.

Our counterparty syndicated 40% of the April 2007 swap agreement by entering into risk participation agreements with a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. and another financial institution. On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which triggered termination of its risk participation agreement with our counterparty. As agreed with our counterparty, the swap was amended to increase the fixed rate by four basis points to 4.95% to compensate our counterparty for assuming the additional credit risk. We ~~dedesignated the~~de-designated the cash flow hedging relationship under the original terms of the swap and re-designated the amended swap in a new cash flow hedging relationship. The deferred loss associated with the ~~dedesignated~~de-designated hedge is being amortized over the life of the debt.

We entered into an additional interest rate swap agreement in June 2009 to effectively convert an additional portion of our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The notional amount of this swap was $300.0 million and it matured on June 30, 2011.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

We use foreign currency forward contracts, when appropriate, to hedge forecasted United Kingdom pound sterling inventory purchases. The foreign currency forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2010, a selection of which were designated as cash flow hedges, matured in January 2011. We entered into additional foreign currency forward contracts in June 2011 with notional values totaling $59.5 million and maturity dates extending ~~from July to~~ through December 2011. We elected to not designate these forward contracts as cash flow hedges. The notional amount outstanding at September 30, 2011 was $23.5 million.

Notional Amounts and Fair Values

The following table summarizes the effects derivative instruments have on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position:

	Notional amounts				Other current assets
(In millions)	June 30,2011		December 31,2010		June 30,2011		December 31,2010
Asset derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging relationships:
Foreign currency forward contracts, current	$	59.5	$	—	$	0.6	$	—

	Notional amounts				Other accrued expenses
(In millions)	June 30,2011		December 31,2010		June 30,2011		December 31,2010
Liability derivatives designated as cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts, current	$	150.0	$	450.0	$	3.3	$	8.3
Liability derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts, current		—		—		0.2		0.3
Foreign currency forward contracts, current		—		0.3		—		—
Total derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging relationships		—		0.3		0.2		0.3
Total liability derivatives	$	150.0	$	450.3	$	3.5	$	8.6

Notional Amounts and Fair Values

The following table summarizes the effects derivative instruments have on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position:


	Notional amounts				Other accrued expenses
(In millions)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Liability derivatives designated as cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts, current	$	150.0	$	450.0	$	1.6	$	8.3

Liability derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts, current		—		—		0.1		0.3
Foreign currency forward contracts, current		23.5		0.3		0.8		—

Total derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging relationships		23.5		0.3		0.9		0.3

Total liability derivatives	$	173.5	$	450.3	$	2.5	$	8.6

Derivatives not in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:

The following table summarizes the ~~gains~~ (losses) gains recorded in income from derivative instruments that are not designated in cash flow hedging relationships:

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011			~~June~~September 2730,2010			~~June~~September 30,2011			~~June~~September 2730,2010
Interest rate contracts (a)	$	—(0.1	)	$	(0.95	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(12.94	)
Foreign currency forward contracts (b)		(0.68	)		(01.5	)		(0.63	)		(6.4.9	)
Total	$	(0.69	)	$	(1.40	)	$	(0.5	)	$	(87.3	)

(a) Amounts are included in Interest expense related to the ~~dedesignation~~de-designation of the original hedging relationship

(b)	Amounts are included in Cost of sales

We expect $0.1 million of net unrealized losses related to the ~~dedesignation~~de-designation of the original cash flow hedging relationship to be reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Interest expense over the next ~~six~~three months.

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:

The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss from the effective portion of derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships:

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011		~~June~~September 2730,2010		~~June~~September 30,2011		~~June~~September 2730,2010
Interest rate contracts	$	2.1.3	$	32.67	$	45.69	$	47.96
Foreign currency forward contracts		—		0.29		—		(5.4.5	)
Total	$	2.1.3	$	3.86	$	45.69	$	(03.51	)

The following table summarizes the losses reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Cost of sales for the effective portion of derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(In millions)	June 30,2011			June 27,2010			June 30,2011			June 27,2010
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	(0.8	)	$	(4.8	)	$	(5.5	)	$	(7.3	)

WeThe ~~have~~following notable ~~unrealized~~summarizes the losses onreclassified ~~foreign currency forward contracts designated and effective as cash flow hedges to reclassify~~ from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Cost of sales ~~over~~for the ~~next~~effective ~~six~~portion ~~months~~of asderivative ~~the~~instruments ~~underlying~~designated ~~transactions~~in ~~have~~cash ~~matured~~flow ~~and~~hedging ~~the~~relationships: ~~hedged items are reflected fully in earnings.~~


	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	(4.8	)	$	(5.5	)	$	(12.1	)

We have no unrealized losses on foreign currency forward contracts designated and effective as cash flow hedges to reclassify from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Cost of sales over the next three months as the underlying transactions have matured and the hedged items are reflected fully in earnings.

The following table summarizes the gains recorded in Interest expense from the ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing of derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships:

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011		~~June~~September 2730,2010		~~June~~September 30,2011		~~June~~September 2730,2010
Interest rate contracts	$	0.5	$	—	$	1.06	$	—

6. Restructuring

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we continued restructuring actions announced in 2009 ~~and~~ and 2010, which were taken as part of our ongoing cost reduction initiatives and in response to lower aircraft production rates that reflected depressed demand in the general aviation industry. The estimated severance cost of this program is approximately $10.0 million, including the effect of additional incentives that were included in the new collective bargaining agreement approved by our union work force in August 2011.

The following table summarizes pre-tax charges related to our restructuring actions:

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011		~~June~~September 2730,2010		~~June~~September 30,2011		~~June~~September 2730,2010
Business and General Aviation	$	2.3.6	$	31.47	$	3.7.3	$	57.30
Trainer/Attack Aircraft		—		0.31		0.1		0.34
Total	$	2.3.6	$	31.78	$	37.84	$	57.64

The following table summarizes the changes in our restructuring and other reserve balances, which are recorded as Other accrued expenses:

(In millions)	Facilitiesand OtherConsolidationCosts (a)			SeveranceandRelated Costs			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	1.1		$	4.2		$	5.3
Accruals		—0.1			37.83			37.84
Payments		(0.3	)		(24.62	)		(24.95	)
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	0.8		$	5.4		$	6.2
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	0.9		$	7.3		$	8.2

(a)	The facilities and other consolidation costs primarily represent future lease payments for facility closures.

7. Other Accrued Expenses

The following table summarizes the components of Other accrued expenses:

(In millions)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Post-delivery commitments	$	50.0	$	56.8
Supplier claims		33.0		50.5
Development advances received		28.2		29.6
Product warranty, current		21.5		21.0
Non-warranty repair reserve		19.9		32.8
Other accrued expenses		90.1		100.9
Total	$	242.7	$	291.6

7. Other Accrued Expenses

The following table summarizes the components of Other accrued expenses:


(In millions)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Post-delivery commitments	$	43.0	$	56.8
Supplier claims		30.8		50.5
Development advances received		28.1		29.6
Non-warranty repair reserve		20.9		32.8
Product warranty, current		14.4		21.0
Other accrued expenses		88.4		100.5

Total	$	225.6	$	291.2

8. Debt and Notes Payable

The following table summarizes the components of our debt and notes payable:

	June 30,		December 31,
(In millions)	September 30,2011		December 31,2010
(In millions)	2011		2010
Short-term debt:
Notes payable	$	69.5	$	59.6
Revolving credit facility	$	50.0	$	—
Notes payable		67.2		59.6
Current portion of long-term debt		—		15.0
Total short-term debt		69117.52		74.6
Senior secured term loan due 2014, net of current portion		1,212.8		1,238.3
Incremental secured term loan due 2014, net of current portion		~~183~~184.51		186.2
Senior fixed rate notes due 2015		182.9		182.9
Senior PIK-election notes due 2015		302.6		302.6
Senior subordinated notes due 2017		145.1		145.1
Total long-term debt		2,~~026~~027.95		2,055.1
Total debt	$	2,~~096~~144.47	$	2,129.7

The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding notes payable was 5.38% at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, ~~and~~ and 5.40% at December 31, 2010. We issued $83123.15 million of ~~these~~current deferred payment obligation notes payable to a supplier and paid ~~off~~ $73115.29 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. The issuance of these notes was treated as a noncash financing transaction.

In accordance with our ~~debt~~credit agreement, we were required to make a prepayment of principal toward our senior secured and incremental term loans as a result of our excess cash flow for the year 2010. We paid $44.5 million of principal on March 2, 2011, which we elected to apply against our principal repayment schedules. This election eliminates required principal payments set forth in our repayment schedules until near maturity of these debt instruments. The weighted average floating interest rate on the secured term loans was 3.3335% at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and 3.39% at December 31, 2010.

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we drew a total of $75.0 million on our revolving credit facility. We also paid $25.0 million on our revolving credit facility and $0.3 million of related interest during this same period. The weighted average interest rate was 1.98%.

9. Product Warranty

The following table summarizes activity related to our commercial aircraft and parts warranty provisions, the majority of which are recorded in Other long-term liabilities:

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011			~~June~~September 2730,2010			~~June~~September 30,2011			~~June~~September 2730,2010
Beginning balance	$	5653.6		$	6562.64		$	61.8		$	67.9
Accrual for aircraft and part deliveries		62.35			43.62			118.13			811.57
Reversals related to prior period deliveries		(0.2	)		(0.9	)		(1.4	)		(1.1	)
(Reversals) accruals related to prior period deliveries		(1.3	)		0.4			(2.7	)		(0.6	)
Warranty services provided		(9.18	)		(67.92	)		(1722.94	)		(1220.92	)
Ending balance	$	5345.60		$	6258.48		$	5345.60		$	6258.48

10. Fair Value Measurements

We determine fair value utilizing the following three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value:

•

Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

•

Level 2 Inputs – Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; observable inputs other than quoted prices; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data.

•

Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs reflecting our assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

11The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments and, therefore, is not included in the following tables.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	June 30, 2011							December 31, 2010
	September 30, 2011							December 31, 2010
(In millions)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Assets
Cash equivalents	$	128.7	$	—		$	—	$	395.7	$	—		$	—
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	0.6		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Liabilities
Interest rate contracts	$	—	$	(3.5	)	$	—	$	—	$	(8.6	)	$	—
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	(0.8	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Interest rate contracts	$	—	$	(1.7	)	$	—	$	—	$	(8.6	)	$	—

The following table summarizes the effect of recording our foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps at fair value in our statement of financial position:

	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
(In millions)	ForeignCurrencyForwardContracts			~~Interest RateContracts~~InterestRateContracts			ForeignCurrencyForwardContracts		~~Interest RateContracts~~InterestRateContracts
Other current assets	$	0.6		$	—		$	—	$	—
Other accrued expenses-current	$	(0.8	)	$	(1.7	)	$	—	$	(8.6	)
Other accrued expenses-current		—			(3.5	)		—		(8.6	)
Net derivative asset (liability)	$	0.6		$	(3.5	)	$	—	$	(8.6	)

The estimated fair value of long-term debt is based on indicative broker pricing. The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of our debt:

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(In millions)	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Senior secured term loan (including current portion)	$	1,212.8	$	1,020.3	$	1,251.3	$	1,091.7
Incremental secured term loan due 2014		183.5		185.1		188.2		186.4
Senior fixed rate notes		182.9		144.5		182.9		140.4
Senior PIK-election notes		302.6		237.2		302.6		230.0
Senior subordinated notes		145.1		105.2		145.1		82.4
Total	$	2,026.9	$	1,692.3	$	2,070.1	$	1,730.9

11. Income Taxes

Income taxes for the interim periods presented have been included in the accompanying financial statements on the basis of an estimated annual effective tax rate. In addition to the amount of tax resulting from applying the estimated annual effective tax rate to pre-tax income, we include certain items treated as discrete events to arrive at an estimated overall tax amount. The effective tax rate in the six months ended June 30, 2011, was 0.2%. The effective tax rate in the six months ended June 27, 2010 was negative 2.2%. The primary difference between the effective tax rate and statutory tax rate in the jurisdictions in which we operate is a result of the valuation allowance against our net U.S. deferred tax assets.

We have a valuation allowance against our net U.S. deferred tax assets (excluding “naked credits”). Naked credits refer to deferred tax liabilities associated with the tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets that are not amortized for financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax liability remains on the balance sheet indefinitely until such time the related assets are impaired or the business to which those assets relate are disposed. As the deferred tax liability could have an indefinite life, it is not netted against our deferred tax assets when determining the required valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was established based upon management’s assessment of all available evidence, both positive and negative, including current and historical operating results, future income projections and potential tax-planning strategies. The conclusion was based primarily on our cumulative pre-tax losses in recent years and the need to generate significant amounts of taxable income in future periods in order to utilize existing deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance increased to $597.9 million as of June 30, 2011, from $511.2 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in valuation allowance was a result of an increase in our U.S. deferred tax assets, primarily related to U.S. federal

~~and~~The ~~state~~estimated ~~net~~fair ~~operating~~value ~~losses.~~of Welong-term ~~intend~~debt tois ~~maintain~~based ~~a full valuation allowance~~ on ~~our~~indicative Ubroker pricing.S. ~~deferred~~The following ~~tax~~table ~~assets~~presents ~~until~~the ~~sufficient~~carrying ~~positive~~amount ~~evidence~~and ~~related~~estimated tofair ~~sources~~value of ~~future~~our ~~taxable~~debt: ~~income exists to support a reversal of the valuation allowance.~~


	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
(In millions)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Senior secured term loan (including current portion)	$	1,212.8	$	842.9	$	1,251.3	$	1,091.7
Incremental secured term loan		184.1		144.5		188.2		186.4
Senior fixed rate notes		182.9		77.7		182.9		140.4
Senior PIK-election notes		302.6		137.7		302.6		230.0
Senior subordinated notes		145.1		52.2		145.1		82.4

Total	$	2,027.5	$	1,255.0	$	2,070.1	$	1,730.9

11. Income Taxes

Generally, the amount of income tax expense or benefit allocated to continuing operations is determined without regard to the tax effects of other categories of income or loss, such as Accumulated other comprehensive income/loss (“AOCI”). However, an exception to the general rule is provided when there is a pre-tax loss from continuing operations and pre-tax income from other categories in the current year. The intraperiod tax allocation rules in ASC 740 related to items charged directly to AOCI can result in disproportionate tax effects that remain in AOCI until certain events occur.

During the quarter, we eliminated the disproportionate tax effects in AOCI related to our cash flow hedges. The underlying inventory being hedged was sold and the unrealized gains/losses were reclassified to the statement of operations which resulted in the release of approximately $15.0 million of deferred tax expense to continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was negative 6.5%, including the discrete impact of the disproportionate tax effects from the cash flow hedges described above. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was negative 1.5%. The primary difference between the effective tax rate and statutory tax rate in the jurisdictions in which we operate is a result of the valuation allowance against our net U.S. deferred tax assets.

We have a valuation allowance against our net U.S. deferred tax assets (excluding “naked credits”). Naked credits refer to deferred tax liabilities associated with the tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets that are not amortized for financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax liability remains on the balance sheet indefinitely until such time the related assets are impaired or the business to which those assets relate are disposed. As the deferred tax liability could have an indefinite life, it is not netted against our deferred tax assets when determining the required valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was established based upon management’s assessment of all available evidence, both positive and negative, including current and historical operating results, future income projections and potential tax-planning strategies. The conclusion was based primarily on our cumulative pretax losses in recent years and the need to generate significant amounts of taxable income in future periods in order to utilize existing deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance increased to $584.1 million as of September 30, 2011, from $511.2 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in valuation allowance was a result of an increase in our U.S. deferred tax assets, primarily related to U.S. federal and state net operating losses. We intend to maintain a full valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets until sufficient positive evidence related to sources of future taxable income exists to support a reversal of the valuation allowance.

The statute of limitations on our 2007 U.S. Federal tax return expired during the quarter. The impact of the expiration on our financial statements was not material for the nine months ended September 30, 2011

12. Pension and Other Employee Benefits

We have defined benefit pension and retirement plans covering the majority of our employees hired prior to January 1, 2007. We also provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to retired employees through other postretirement defined benefit plans.

In October 2010, we announced that we would implement a cost reduction and productivity program that included reducing our factory and shop work forces by approximately 800 employees over a period of time. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we re-measured certain of our benefit plans in connection with these actions. As a result, we recorded a curtailment loss of $3.1 million that reflects the immediate recognition of a portion of the previously unrecognized prior service cost of our hourly employee defined benefit pension plan. We are also recording a curtailment gain of $2.1 million over the related termination period as a result of the re-measurement of our retiree medical plan for union employees. The portion of this gain recognized during the period ended June 30, 2011, was $0.2 million and the remainder is anticipated to be recognized by March 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes the components of net pension expense:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(In millions)	June 30, 2011			June 27, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 27, 2010
Service cost	$	5.9		$	5.8		$	12.0		$	11.6
Interest cost		14.4			14.4			28.7			28.7
Expected return on plan assets		(14.4	)		(14.3	)		(28.7	)		(28.6	)
Amortization of prior service cost		0.4			0.4			0.8			0.9
Amortization of net loss		6.7			3.5			13.4			7.0
Pension curtailment loss		3.1			—			3.1			—
Net amount recorded	$	16.1		$	9.8		$	29.3		$	19.6

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic other benefits expense:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(In millions)	June 30, 2011			June 27, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 27, 2010
Service cost	$	0.1		$	0.1		$	0.2		$	0.2
Interest cost		0.2			0.2			0.3			0.4
Amortization of net gain		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)
Curtailment gain		(0.2	)		—			(0.2	)		—
Amount recorded	$	—		$	0.2		$	0.1		$	0.4

Total required and discretionary contributions to our defined benefit pension and retirement plans were $22.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, of anticipated contributions of $44.2 million for the year 2011. Total required and discretionary contributions to our other postretirement defined benefit plans were $0.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, of anticipated contributions of $0.6 million for the year 2011.

We maintain a 401(k) defined contribution plan under which covered employees are allowed to contribute up to a specific percentage of their eligible compensation. Prior to October 2009, we matched union and non-union employee contributions up to the first four percent of eligible compensation. The match for all non-union employees was suspended in October 2009 and was reinstated in October 2010, now matching 50% of the first four percent of contributions. Our total match expense was $2.6 million and $5.6 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $1.4 million and $2.8 million in the three and six months ended June 27, 2010.

We maintain a retirement income savings program (“RISP”), which is part of our defined contribution plan, for certain employees who were hired on or after January 1, 2007. These employees participate in the RISP in place of the defined benefit pension and retirement plans described previously. We contribute to the covered employee’s participant account up to a maximum of 9% of the employee’s pay based on the employee’s age and tenure. Total expense for the RISP was $0.6 million and $2.0 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $0.9 million and $1.7 million in the three and six months ended June 27, 2010.

In October 2010, we announced that we would implement a cost reduction and productivity program that included reducing our factory and shop work forces by approximately 800 employees over a period of time. During the second quarter of 2011, we re-measured certain of our benefit plans in connection with these actions. We have recorded a curtailment loss of $1.2 million and $4.3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, to reflect an increase in the projected benefit obligation of our hourly employee defined benefit pension plan. We are also recording a curtailment gain of $2.1 million over the related termination period as a result of the re-measurement of our retiree medical plan for union employees. We recorded $0.2 million and $0.4 million of this gain during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The remainder is anticipated to be recorded by December 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes the components of net pension expense:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Service cost	$	5.5		$	5.8		$	17.5		$	17.4
Interest cost		14.4			14.4			43.2			43.1
Expected return on plan assets		(14.7	)		(14.3	)		(43.5	)		(42.9	)
Amortization of prior service cost		0.3			0.5			1.1			1.4
Amortization of net loss		6.7			3.5			20.1			10.5
Pension curtailment loss		1.2			—			4.3			—

Net pension expense	$	13.4		$	9.9		$	42.7		$	29.5

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic other benefits expense:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Service cost	$	0.1		$	0.1		$	0.3		$	0.3
Interest cost		0.1			0.2			0.5			0.6
Amortization of net gain		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)
Curtailment gain		(0.2	)		—			(0.4	)		—

Net periodic other benefits expense	$	(0.1	)	$	0.2		$	0.1		$	0.6

Total required and discretionary contributions to our defined benefit pension and retirement plans were $36.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, of anticipated contributions of $44.2 million for the year 2011. Total required and discretionary contributions to our other postretirement defined benefit plans were $0.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, of anticipated contributions of $0.6 million for the year 2011.

We maintain a 401(k) defined contribution plan under which covered employees are allowed to contribute up to a specific percentage of their eligible compensation. Prior to October 2009, we matched union and non-union employee contributions up to the first four percent of eligible compensation. The match for all non-union employees was suspended in October 2009 and was reinstated in October 2010, now matching 50% of the first four percent of contributions. The match for union employees was reduced to 50% of the first four percent of contributions as part of the collective bargaining agreement ratified in August 2011, to be in tandem with our non-union employees. Our total match expense was $1.8 million and $7.3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $1.6 million and $4.4 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

We maintain a retirement income savings program (“RISP”), which is part of our defined contribution plan, for certain employees who were hired on or after January 1, 2007. These employees participate in the RISP in place of the defined benefit pension and retirement plans described previously. We contribute to the covered employee’s participant account up to a maximum of 9% of the employee’s pay based on the employee’s age and tenure. Total expense for the RISP was $1.0 million and $3.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $1.1 million and $2.8 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

13. Stock-Based Compensation

On August 9, 2011, we entered into option exchange agreements with certain eligible option holders that offered the right to exchange outstanding options for restricted stock units. For every 1.75 eligible options surrendered, one restricted stock unit was issued that represents a right to receive one share of common stock in the future, provided that certain specified criteria are satisfied.

The effects of this exchange program are included in the following tables.

The following tables summarize our stock option activity:

	Number of Options
	Six Months			Six Months
Service-Vesting	Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2011			Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010
	Ended			Ended
Service-Vesting	June 30, 2011			June 27, 2010
Beginning balance		5,349,672			3,694,387
Granted		—			2,~~495~~642,~~168~~673
Forfeited or expired		(~~239~~1,~~225~~180,945	)		(~~404~~535,~~420~~046	)
Ending balance		5,110,447			5,785,135
Exchanged		(3,860,651	)		—
	Number of Options
Ending balance		308,076			5,802,014
	Six Months			Six Months
	Ended			Ended
Performance-Vesting	June 30, 2011			June 27, 2010
Beginning balance		3,026,673			3,490,523
Granted		—			285,168
Forfeited or expired		(175,757	)		(157,294	)
Ending balance		2,850,916			3,618,397


	Number of Options
Performance-Vesting	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Beginning balance		3,026,673			3,490,523
Granted		—			412,668
Forfeited or expired		(926,705	)		(188,436	)
Exchanged		(1,960,630	)		—

Ending balance		139,338			3,714,755

The following table summarizes restricted share activity:

	Number of Options
	Number of Restricted Shares
	Six Months			Six Months
Restricted Shares	Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2011			Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010
	Ended			Ended
Restricted Shares	June 30, 2011			June 27, 2010
Beginning balance		179,789			158,878
Granted		—652,710			182,829
Vested		(32,326	)		(62,809	)
Exchanged		3,326,445			—
Ending balance		147,463			278,898
Vested		(32,326	)		(84,130	)
Ending balance		4,126,618			257,577

We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million and $12.62 million in the three and ~~six months~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $1.41 million and $2.3.4 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010.

14. Related Party Transactions

Onex Partners II LP and its affiliated entities own 49% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Hawker Beechcraft, Inc. Affiliates of Onex Partners II LP currently own a controlling interest in Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (“Spirit”), one of our suppliers. Spirit supplies certain components for our Hawker aircraft,. ~~and~~We we believe that our purchases of components from Spirit are based on standard market terms. We purchased components from Spirit of $2.74 million and $47.82 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $01.89 million and $14.52 million in the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. We owe Spirit $1.28 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, for components we have received, as opposed to advance payments made of $1.7 million at December 31, 2010, for goods not yet received.

We are party to a management services arrangement with the investment managers of GS Capital Partners VI, L.P., and its related funds, and Onex Partners II LP. Under the arrangement, we pay these parties an annual aggregate fee of $2.0 million plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses as compensation for various advisory services. This fee is shared equally by the two sets of investment managers. We also agreed to indemnify these parties and their affiliates for liabilities arising from their actions under the management services arrangement.

An15 entity affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Onex Partners II LP completed open-market purchases of $152.8 million of our outstanding notes in February 2010. As of June 30, 2011, the debt acquired by the affiliate has not been retired and we will continue to pay interest in accordance with terms of the debt. The affiliate’s outstanding balance of these notes was $159.4 million at

~~June 30,~~reasonable ~~2011,~~out-of-pocket ~~and~~expenses atas ~~December 31,~~compensation ~~2010~~for various advisory services. ~~The~~This ~~amount~~fee ofis ~~accrued~~shared ~~interest~~equally ~~associated~~by ~~with~~the ~~these~~two ~~notes~~sets ~~was~~of $3investment managers.6 ~~million~~We atalso ~~June 30,~~agreed ~~2011,~~to indemnify these parties and their ataffiliates ~~December 31,~~for ~~2010~~liabilities arising from their actions under the management services arrangement.

An entity affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Onex Partners II LP completed open-market purchases of $152.8 million of our outstanding notes in February 2010. As of September 30, 2011, the debt acquired by the affiliate has not been retired and we will continue to pay interest in accordance with terms of the debt. The affiliate’s outstanding balance of these notes was $159.4 million at September 30, 2011, and at December 31, 2010. The amount of accrued interest associated with these notes was $7.1 million at September 30, 2011, and $3.6 million at December 31, 2010.

15. Commitments and Contingencies

We lease equipment, office buildings and other facilities in the ordinary course of business, under leases that include standard escalation clauses to reflect changes in price indices as well as renewal options. Our rent expense was $3.64 million and $610.93 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $43.04 million and $710.14 million in the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010.

We have assigned certain leasehold interests to third parties but remain liable to lessors through 2026 to the extent the assignee defaults on future lease payments amounting to $1716.15 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $18.5 million at December 31, 2010.

We have committed to construct facilities and purchase equipment under contracts with various third parties. Future payments required under these contracts were $612.14 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $5.4 million at December 31, 2010.

We retain liability for losses and expenses for aircraft product liability up to a maximum of $10 million per occurrence and $20 million per fiscal year. Insurance purchased from third parties is expected to cover excess aggregate liability exposure from $20 million to $750 million and excess liability over the per occurrence limits. Raytheon Company retained the liability for claims relating to occurrences after April 1, 2001, through March 25, 2007. We have responsibility for claims relating to occurrences prior to April 1, 2001, subject to limited exceptions covering specific liabilities retained by Raytheon Company. Our aircraft product liability reserve was $1112.83 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $13.0 million at December 31, 2010, based on management’s estimate of our expected losses not covered by third party insurers. We currently have no offsetting receivable for insurance recovery associated with this estimate.

We issue guarantees and have banks and surety companies issue letters of credit and surety bonds on our behalf to meet various administrative, bid, performance, warranty, retention and advance payment obligations of us or our affiliates. The following table summarizes the outstanding items, which expire on various dates through 2016, for which there were stated values:

(In millions)	~~June~~September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Guarantees	$	~~130~~126.32	$	117.9
Letters of credit	$	41.41	$	42.4
Surety bonds	$	5.0	$	1.1

In connection with certain aircraft sales, we offer trade-in incentives whereby the customer will receive a pre-determined trade-in value if they purchase another aircraft of equal or greater value from us. The differences between the value of these trade-in incentives and the current, lower, estimated fair value of the underlying aircraft was $1812.68 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $17.1 million at December 31, 2010. There is a high degree of uncertainty inherent in assessing the likelihood of trade-in commitments.

We are subject to oversight by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) as well as comparable agencies, including but not limited to the European Aviation Safety Agency and the Civil Aviation Administration of China, which regulate these matters in other countries. The FAA and such other agencies routinely ~~evaluates~~evaluate aircraft operational and safety requirements and is are responsible for certification of new and modified aircraft. Future action by the FAA or such other agencies may adversely affect our financial position or results of operations, including recovery of our investment in new aircraft. ~~Comparable agencies, including but not limited to the European Aviation Safety Agency and the Civil Aviation Administration of China, regulate these matters in other countries.~~

As a defense contractor, we are subject to many levels of audit and investigation. Agencies that oversee contract performance include: the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the U.S. Department of Defense Inspector General, the Government Accountability Office, the U.S. Department of Justice and Congressional committees. Future action by these agencies and legislative committees may adversely affect our financial position or results of operations.

In16 July 2007, the FAA informed us that it had initiated an investigation concerning compliance by one of our suppliers with part specifications involving our T-6A trainers and certain special mission King Air aircraft sold to the U.S. government. HBAC cooperated with the FAA investigation and conducted its own supplier quality audits. HBAC believes the alleged non-compliance condition does not impact safety of flight. On June 17, 2008, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Kansas notified us that the FAA had referred a civil penalty matter arising out of its investigation to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for enforcement and that the FAA had recommended imposing civil penalties against HBAC. HBAC has reached a settlement with the FAA with respect to this matter. It does not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. The settlement was neither an admission of liability or wrongdoing by HBAC, and there was no finding of any regulatory or other violation.

~~non-conformance~~We ~~with~~are ~~specifications~~from ~~and~~time ~~HBAC’s~~to ~~alleged~~time ~~inadequate~~subject ~~quality~~to, ~~control~~and ~~over~~are ~~the~~presently ~~supplier’s~~involved ~~manufacturing~~in, ~~process~~litigation onor ~~certain~~other legal ~~T-6~~proceedings ~~and~~arising ~~King~~in ~~Air~~the ~~aircraft~~ordinary ~~delivered~~course toof ~~the government~~business. ~~The lawsuit,~~We ~~United~~are ~~States~~a exdefendant ~~rel.~~in ~~Minge,~~a etnumber ~~al.~~of v.product ~~Turbine~~liability ~~Engine~~lawsuits ~~Components~~with ~~Technologies~~respect ~~Corporation,~~to etaccidents ~~al.,~~involving ~~No. 07-1212-MLB~~our ~~(D.~~aircraft ~~Kan.),~~that ~~alleged~~allege ~~FCA~~personal ~~causes~~injury ofand ~~action~~property ~~against~~damage ~~HBAC (~~and ~~its~~seek ~~predecessor~~substantial recoveries, ~~Raytheon~~including, ~~Aircraft Company)~~in ~~and~~some ~~FCA causes of action~~cases, ~~retaliation~~punitive ~~causes~~and ofexemplary ~~action,~~damages. ~~and~~We amaintain ~~tort~~partial ~~cause~~insurance ofcoverage ~~action~~ against ~~TECT~~such ~~Aerospace~~claims ~~Wellington,~~at ~~Inc.~~a ~~(“TECT”),~~level andetermined ~~HBAC~~by ~~supplier,~~management ~~and~~to ~~various~~be ~~affiliates of TECT~~prudent. OnIn ~~February 3~~addition, ~~2010,~~Raytheon ~~the~~Company ~~District~~retained ~~of Kansas~~all ~~court~~product ~~granted~~liability ~~HBAC’s~~claims arising ~~motion~~from ~~for~~incidents ~~summary~~occurring ~~judgment~~after inApril 1, ~~the~~2001 ~~qui~~until ~~tam~~March 25, ~~case~~2007. ~~The~~We ~~Court~~cannot ~~permitted~~predict the ~~FCA~~outcome ~~retaliation cause~~ of ~~action~~these tomatters ~~proceed~~or ~~against~~whether ~~TECT.~~Raytheon OnCompany ~~June 1,~~will ~~2010,~~uphold ~~the~~its ~~plaintiffs~~indemnity ~~filed~~obligations a(see ~~motion~~Item 1A, to“Risk ~~reconsider the order~~Factors” ~~granting~~contained ~~summary~~in ~~judgment~~our ~~and~~Annual aReport ~~motion~~on toForm ~~amend~~10-K for the ~~complaint.~~year Onended ~~August~~December 231, 2010,). ~~the~~We ~~Court~~are ~~denied~~at ~~plaintiffs’~~risk ~~motion~~of tolosses ~~reconsider~~and ~~the~~adverse ~~order~~publicity ~~but~~stemming ~~granted~~from ~~plaintiffs’~~any ~~leave~~accident toinvolving ~~file~~aircraft anfor ~~amended~~which ~~complaint.~~we Onhold ~~September 29,~~design ~~2010,~~authority. ~~HBAC filed~~The anoutcome ~~Answer~~of ~~and~~litigation ~~Affirmative~~in which ~~Defenses.~~we ~~Discovery~~have isbeen ~~pending~~named ~~pursuant~~as to a ~~November 12,~~defendant ~~2010~~is ~~Scheduling~~unpredictable ~~Order~~ and an ~~April 12,~~adverse ~~2011~~decision ~~Second~~in ~~Scheduling~~any ~~Order,~~such ~~and~~matter ~~per~~could have a ~~July 20,~~material ~~2011~~adverse ~~Order,~~effect ~~fact discovery~~ on ~~the~~our ~~limited~~financial ~~issues currently before the Court shall be completed by November 30~~condition, ~~2011.~~results ~~No accruals have been recorded for this matter as~~ of ~~June 30,~~operations ~~2011~~or liquidity.

OnIn ~~April 7,~~July ~~2009~~2007, ~~Airbus UK Ltd. (“Airbus”) filed a Request for Arbitration with~~ the ~~International~~FAA ~~Chamber~~informed ofus ~~Commerce in Paris initiating proceedings against HBAC. Airbus alleged~~ that ~~HBAC~~ ~~breached~~it ~~its~~had ~~obligations~~initiated ~~under~~an ~~the~~investigation ~~Airframe~~concerning ~~Purchase~~compliance ~~and~~by ~~Support~~one ~~Agreement dated August 19, 1998 between Airbus and HBAC. More particularly, Airbus claimed that it and HBAC reached agreement in April~~ of ~~2008~~our ~~for~~suppliers ~~HBAC~~with ~~to purchase increased~~part ~~volumes~~specifications ofinvolving ~~fuselages,~~our ~~wings,~~T-6A ~~track~~trainers ~~kits~~ and ~~spare~~certain ~~parts~~special ~~(collectively~~mission ~~the~~King ~~“shipsets”)~~Air inaircraft ~~the~~sold ~~2008~~ to ~~2010~~the ~~time~~U.S. ~~frame~~government. ~~Airbus further alleged that (i) beginning in late 2008,~~ HBAC ~~unilaterally~~cooperated ~~reduced~~with the ~~number~~FAA ofinvestigation ~~shipsets that it would purchase in breach of its contractual obligations~~ and ~~(ii) that Airbus~~conducted ~~made substantial investments to expand~~ its ~~production~~own ~~capacity~~supplier atquality ~~the~~audits. ~~urging of~~ HBAC ~~and~~believes inthe ~~reliance on~~ alleged ~~expanded commitments from HBAC. On~~non-compliance ~~December 23,~~condition ~~2009,~~does ~~Airbus~~not ~~filed~~impact ~~its~~safety ~~Statement~~ of ~~Claim, which sought an award of damages potentially in excess of £40 million~~flight. ~~HBAC~~On ~~filed its Statement of Defense and Counterclaim on April~~June 517, ~~2010~~2008, ~~denying liability and asserting a counterclaim against Airbus in~~ the ~~amount of £6,433,015~~U. ~~The arbitration merits hearing was held July 27-30, 2010~~S. ~~Post-hearing~~Attorney’s ~~submissions~~Office ~~were~~for ~~completed~~the inDistrict ~~October~~of ~~2010.~~Kansas Onnotified ~~April 29,~~us ~~2011,~~that the ~~International~~FAA ~~Chamber~~had ofreferred ~~Commerce issued~~a ~~its~~civil ~~final~~penalty ~~award~~matter inarising ~~favor~~out of ~~Airbus~~its ininvestigation to the ~~amount~~U.S. ofAttorney’s Office ~~£6,649,975~~for ~~plus~~enforcement ~~interest~~ and ~~arbitrator~~that ~~costs,~~the ~~with~~FAA ~~each~~had ~~party~~recommended toimposing ~~bear~~civil ~~its~~penalties ~~own~~against ~~legal~~HBAC. ~~fees~~HBAC ~~and~~reached ~~costs.~~a Wesettlement ~~paid~~with the ~~final~~FAA ~~award~~with respect to ~~Airbus in May 2011. The effect of~~ this ~~final~~matter ~~award was reflected~~ in the ~~unaudited~~first ~~condensed~~quarter ~~consolidated financial statements~~ of ~~our~~2011. ~~Quarterly~~It ~~Report~~does onnot ~~Form~~have ~~10-Q~~a asmaterial ofimpact ~~and~~on ~~for~~our ~~the~~financial condition, ~~period~~results ~~ended~~of ~~March 31,~~operations ~~2011~~or liquidity. The settlement ~~to Airbus~~ was ~~less~~neither ~~than~~an ~~the~~admission ~~amount previously accrued. This provided a positive impact~~ of ~~approximately~~liability ~~$6.0~~or ~~million~~wrongdoing onby ~~our~~HBAC, ~~operating loss within the Business~~ and ~~General~~there ~~Aviation segment that~~ was ~~partially~~no ~~offset~~finding byof aany ~~$2.5~~regulatory ~~million~~or ~~increase~~other ~~in interest expense~~violation.

In April 2009, HBAC received a complaint naming it as a defendant in a qui tam lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The complaint alleged violations of the civil False Claims Act (“FCA”) arising from alleged supplier non-conformance with specifications and HBAC’s alleged inadequate quality control over the supplier’s manufacturing process on certain T-6 and King Air aircraft delivered to the government. The lawsuit, United States ex rel. Minge, et al. v. Turbine Engine Components Technologies Corporation, et al., No. 07-1212-MLB (D. Kan.), alleged FCA causes of action against HBAC (and its predecessor, Raytheon Aircraft Company) and FCA causes of action, retaliation causes of action, and a tort cause of action against TECT Aerospace Wellington, Inc. (“TECT”), an HBAC supplier, and various affiliates of TECT. On February 3, 2010, the District of Kansas court granted HBAC’s motion for summary judgment in the qui tam case. The Court permitted the FCA retaliation cause of action to proceed against TECT. On June 1, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider the order granting summary judgment and a motion to amend the complaint. On August 2, 2010, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the order but granted plaintiffs’ leave to file an amended complaint. On September 29, 2010, HBAC filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses. Discovery is pending pursuant to a November 12, 2010 Scheduling Order and an April 12, 2011 Second Scheduling Order, and per a July 20, 2011 Order, fact discovery on the limited issues currently before the Court shall be completed by November 30, 2011. No accruals have been recorded for this matter as of September 30, 2011.

On April 7, 2009, Airbus UK Ltd. (“Airbus”) filed a Request for Arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris initiating proceedings against HBAC. Airbus alleged that HBAC breached its obligations under the Airframe Purchase and Support Agreement dated August 19, 1998 between Airbus and HBAC. More particularly, Airbus claimed that it and HBAC reached agreement in April of 2008 for HBAC to purchase increased volumes of fuselages, wings, track kits and spare parts (collectively the “Shipsets”) in the 2008 to 2010 time frame. Airbus further alleged that (i) beginning in late 2008, HBAC unilaterally reduced the number of Shipsets that it would purchase in breach of its contractual obligations and (ii) that Airbus made substantial investments to expand its production capacity at the urging of HBAC and in reliance on alleged expanded commitments from HBAC. On December 23, 2009, Airbus filed its Statement of Claim, which sought an award of damages potentially in excess of £40 million. HBAC filed its Statement of Defense and Counterclaim on April 5, 2010 denying liability and asserting a counterclaim against Airbus in the amount of £6,433,015. The arbitration merits hearing was held July 27-30, 2010. Post-hearing submissions were completed in October 2010. On April 29, 2011, the International Chamber of Commerce issued its final award in favor of Airbus in the amount of £6,649,975 plus interest and arbitrator costs, with each party to bear its own legal fees and costs. We paid the final award to Airbus in May 2011. The effect of this final award was reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of and for the period ended March 31, 2011. The settlement to Airbus was less than the amount previously accrued. This provided a positive impact of approximately $6.0 million on our operating loss within the Business and General Aviation segment that was partially offset by a $2.5 million increase in interest expense.

Similar to other companies in our industry, we receive requests for information from government agencies in connection with their regulatory or investigational authority in the ordinary course of business. Such requests can include subpoenas or demand letters for documents to assist the government in audits or investigations. We review such requests and notices and take appropriate action.

16. Business Segment Information

Our reportable segments include ~~the following:~~ Business and General Aviation, Trainer/Attack Aircraft and Customer Support. Business and General Aviation designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells commercial and specially modified general aviation aircraft and related service contracts. Trainer/Attack Aircraft designs, develops, manufactures, markets and ~~sells military training aircraft to the U.S. Government~~ and foreign governments. Customer Support provides aftermarket parts and maintenance services as well as refurbishment and upgrade services for our installed fleet of aircraft worldwide. Certain reclassifications have been made between the Business and General Aviation and Customer Support segments in the prior period to conform to the current period presentation, which reflects the change in responsibility over a specific support program.

~~While~~17 some working capital accounts are maintained on a segment basis, many of our assets are not managed or maintained on a segment basis. Certain property, plant and equipment, including tooling, is used in the design and production of products for each of the segments and, therefore, is not allocated to any individual segment. In addition, cash, other assets, noncurrent liabilities and deferred taxes are maintained and managed on a consolidated basis and generally do not pertain to any particular segment. Raw materials and certain component parts are used in production across all segments. Work in process inventory is identifiable by segment but is managed and evaluated at the program level. As there is no segmentation of our productive assets, no allocation of these amounts has been made for purposes of segment disclosure.

General Aviation designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells commercial and specially modified general aviation aircraft and related service contracts. Trainer/Attack Aircraft designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells military training aircraft to the U.S. Government and foreign governments. Customer Support provides aftermarket parts and maintenance services as well as refurbishment and upgrade services for our installed fleet of aircraft worldwide. Certain reclassifications have been made between the Business and General Aviation and Customer Support segments in the prior period to conform to the current period presentation, which reflects the change in responsibility over a specific product support program.

While some working capital accounts are maintained on a segment basis, many of our assets are not managed or maintained on a segment basis. Certain property, plant and equipment, including tooling, is used in the design and production of products for each of the segments and, therefore, is not allocated to any individual segment. In addition, cash, other assets, noncurrent liabilities and deferred taxes are maintained and managed on a consolidated basis and generally do not pertain to any particular segment. Raw materials and certain component parts are used in production across all segments. Work in process inventory is identifiable by segment but is managed and evaluated at the program level. As there is no segmentation of our productive assets, no allocation of these amounts has been made for purposes of segment disclosure.

The following table summarizes our segment financial results:

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30, 2011			~~June~~September 2730, 2010			~~June~~September 30, 2011			~~June~~September 2730, 2010
Sales:
Business and General Aviation	$	~~291~~283.92		$	~~353~~336.58		$	~~578~~861.13		$	~~688~~1,025.64
Trainer/Attack Aircraft		~~177~~133.57			~~184~~161.81			~~354~~487.18			~~327~~488.23
Customer Support		~~141~~126.27			~~134~~135.56			~~260~~387.95			~~250~~385.28
Eliminations		(2824.98	)		(3338.58	)		(5377.07	)		(5897.53	)
Total	$	~~581~~518.78		$	~~639~~594.37		$	1,~~140~~658.19		$	1,~~207~~802.52
Operating (Loss) Income:
Business and General Aviation	$	(6475.94	)	$	(73124.35	)	$	(~~151~~226.48	)	$	(~~138~~263.94	)
Trainer/Attack Aircraft		1912.36			3220.02			4558.84			5272.13
Customer Support		2620.17			2023.70			4868.29			4164.1
Eliminations		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.12	)		(0.12	)
Total	$	(1942.62	)	$	(2081.74	)	$	(5799.57	)	$	(45127.82	)

Business and General Aviation intersegment sales were $1613.63 million and $3144.57 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and $1916.70 million and $3551.1 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. Customer Support intersegment sales were $1211.30 million and $2132.5 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2011, and $1322.8 million and $2346.42 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. ~~The~~ Trainer/Attack Aircraft intersegment sales were $0.5 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The Trainer/Attack segment ~~does~~did not have intersegment sales in the corresponding periods of 2010.

17. ~~Subsequent~~Guarantor ~~Event~~Subsidiary Financial Information

On July 21, 2011, we drew $25.0 million on our revolving credit facility at an interest rate of 1.94% and on August 5, 2011, we drew an additional $25.0 million. These funds will be used for general business purposes.

On August 6, 2011, our union work force ratified a new collective bargaining agreement that expires on August 7, 2016.

On October 22, 2010, we announced that we would implement a cost reduction and productivity program that included reducing our factory and shop work forces by approximately 800 employees over a period of time. As of June 30, 2011 we had accrued approximately $3.8 million in restructuring severance and related costs. As part of the ratification of the collective bargaining agreement approximately $6.0 million of additional incentives were agreed to. We estimate that in the aggregate the severance cost of this program will be approximately $10.0 million.

18. Guarantor Subsidiary Financial Information

Our obligation to pay principal and interest under certain debt instruments is guaranteed on a joint and several basis by certain guarantor subsidiaries that are 100% owned by us. The guarantees are full and unconditional. Non-guarantor subsidiaries consist primarily of foreign subsidiaries of HBAC, which are organized outside the U.S.

The following unaudited condensed consolidating financial information presents Condensed Consolidating Statements of Financial Position as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010; Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010; and Condensed ~~Consolidating~~ Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010.

Elimination entries necessary to consolidate guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries have been included in the eliminations columns. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.

1718

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Financial Position

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011

(In millions)

											Condensed
	HBAC			GuarantorSubsidiaries		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Eliminations			CondensedConsolidatedTotal
				Guarantor		Non-Guarantor					Consolidated
	HBAC			Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~133~~140.84		$	—	$	97.43	$	—(1.0	)	$	~~143~~146.27
Accounts and notes receivable, net		0.26			~~129~~89.69		98.26		~~(0.2~~—	)		~~138~~99.81
Intercompany receivables		—			1939.14		2.18		(2142.2	)		—
Current portion of industrial revenue bonds receivable		55.0			—		—		(55.0	)		—
Unbilled revenue		—			1921.56		1114.41		—(0.2	)		3035.95
Inventories		—			1,~~165~~311.27		7.20		—			1,~~172~~318.47
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—			9823.28		01.96		(700.1	)		2925.03
Total current assets		~~189~~196.0			1,~~431~~486.64		4041.24		(~~146~~98.5	)		1,~~514~~625.3
Property, plant and equipment, net		1716.09			~~434~~422.18		2.45		—			~~453~~442.52
Investment in subsidiaries		1,~~628~~589.76			—		—		(1,~~628~~589.76	)		—
Industrial revenue bonds receivable		196.8			—		—		(196.8	)		—
Intercompany loan		—			~~181~~216.69		—		(~~181~~216.69	)		—
Goodwill		—			259.5		—		—			259.5
Intangible assets, net		—			~~752~~745.03		0.6		—			~~752~~745.69
Other assets, net		2937.02			109.64		0.1		(19.27	)		3837.50
Total assets	$	2,~~060~~036.5		$	3,~~069~~140.43	$	4344.36	$	(2,~~154~~111.85	)	$	3,~~018~~109.49
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt	$	69117.52		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	69117.52
Current portion of industrial revenue bonds payable		—			55.0		—		(55.0	)		—
Advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred		—			~~223~~267.87		0.2		—			~~224~~267.09
Accounts payable		—0.5			~~284~~345.70		67.94		(1424.27	)		~~277~~328.42
Accrued salaries and wages		—			4655.98		0.34		—			4756.2
Accrued interest payable		1427.68			01.3		—		—			1429.91
Other accrued expenses		88.7			219.0		5.1		(70.1	)		242.7
Current deferred income tax liability, net		15.6			—		0.4		(0.1	)		15.9
Total current liabilities		172.8			829.7		12.5		(139.3	)		875.7
Other accrued expenses		10.3			210.1		5.2		—			225.6
Long-term debt		2,026.9			—		—		—			2,026.9
Total current liabilities		171.4			934.9		13.6		(79.8	)		1040.1
Long-term debt		2,027.5			—		—		—			2,027.5
Industrial revenue bonds payable		—			196.8		—		(196.8	)		—
Intercompany loan		~~177~~220.95			—		1015.91		(~~188~~235.86	)		—
Accrued pension benefits		—			~~338~~329.69		—		—			~~338~~329.69
Other long-term liabilities		0.3			8595.94		—		—(0.1	)		8695.26
Noncurrent deferred income tax liability		—			9.56		—		(19.26	)		~~8.3~~—
Total liabilities		2,~~377~~419.97			1,~~460~~566.56		2328.47		(~~526~~521.19	)		3,~~335~~493.71
Total equity		(317.4	)		1,608.9		19.9		(1,628.7	)		(317.3	)
Total (deficit) equity		(383.2	)		1,573.7		15.9		(1,589.6	)		(383.2	)
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,~~060~~036.5		$	3,~~069~~140.43	$	4344.36	$	(2,~~154~~111.85	)	$	3,~~018~~109.49

1819

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Financial Position

As of December 31, 2010

(In millions)

											Condensed
	HBAC			GuarantorSubsidiaries		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Eliminations			CondensedConsolidatedTotal
				Guarantor		Non-Guarantor					Consolidated
	HBAC			Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Total
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	413.3		$	0.2	$	9.3	$	—		$	422.8
Accounts and notes receivable, net		—			113.8		7.2		—			121.0
Intercompany receivables		—			13.3		2.1		(15.4	)		—
Current portion of industrial revenue bonds receivable		61.5			—		—		(61.5	)		—
Unbilled revenue		—			25.8		8.6		—			34.4
Inventories		—			1,052.8		7.1		—			1,059.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—			96.0		0.5		(65.8	)		30.7
Total current assets		474.8			1,301.9		34.8		(142.7	)		1,668.8
Property, plant and equipment, net		17.5			462.3		2.4		—			482.2
Investment in subsidiaries		1,674.6			—		—		(1,674.6	)		—
Industrial revenue bonds receivable		225.4			—		—		(225.4	)		—
Intercompany loan		—			415.0		—		(415.0	)		—
Goodwill		—			259.5		—		—			259.5
Intangible assets, net		—			758.5		0.6		—			759.1
Other assets, net		32.8			9.2		0.2		—			42.2
Total assets	$	2,425.1		$	3,206.4	$	38.0	$	(2,457.7	)	$	3,211.8
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt	$	74.6		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	74.6
Current portion of industrial revenue bonds payable		—			61.5		—		(61.5	)		—
Advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred		—			265.8		0.2		—			266.0
Accounts payable		0.1			222.0		7.6		(8.6	)		221.1
Accrued salaries and wages		—			64.7		0.3		—			65.0
Accrued interest payable		14.4			0.3		—		—			14.7
Other accrued expenses		82.5			270.6		4.3		(65.8	)		291.6
Total current liabilities		171.6			884.9		12.4		(135.9	)		933.0
Long-term debt		2,055.1			—		—		—			2,055.1
Industrial revenue bonds payable		—			225.4		—		(225.4	)		—
Intercompany loan		408.5			—		13.3		(421.8	)		—
Accrued pension benefits		—			349.4		—		—			349.4
Other long-term liabilities		0.3			74.8		—		—			75.1
Noncurrent deferred income tax liability		4.0			9.6		—		—			13.6
Total liabilities		2,639.5			1,544.1		25.7		(783.1	)		3,426.2
Total equity		(214.4	)		1,662.3		12.3		(1,674.6	)		(214.4	)
Total (deficit) equity		(214.4	)		1,662.3		12.3		(1,674.6	)		(214.4	)
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,425.1		$	3,206.4	$	38.0	$	(2,457.7	)	$	3,211.8

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

(In millions)

													Condensed
				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						Consolidated
	HBAC			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Sales	$	—		$	614.6		$	24.2		$	(57.1	)	$	581.7
Cost of sales		—			538.9			20.5			(57.1	)		502.3
Gross Profit		—			75.7			3.7			—			79.4
Restructuring, net		—			2.3			—			—			2.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses		0.3			66.6			1.1			—			68.0
Research and development expenses		—			28.7			—			—			28.7
Operating (loss) income		(0.3	)		(21.9	)		2.6			—			(19.6	)
Intercompany interest expense (income), net		0.2			(0.2	)		—			—			—
Interest expense, net		31.8			1.0			—			—			32.8
Other (income) expense, net		0.2			1.4			(1.6	)		—			—
Nonoperating expense (income), net		32.2			2.2			(1.6	)		—			32.8
(Loss) income before taxes		(32.5	)		(24.1	)		4.2			—			(52.4	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		(1.4	)		(0.2	)		0.4			—			(1.2	)
(Loss) earnings before equity income		(31.1	)		(23.9	)		3.8			—			(51.2	)
Equity loss (income) in subsidiaries		20.1			—			—			(20.1	)		—
Net (loss) income		(51.2	)		(23.9	)		3.8			20.1			(51.2	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			0.1			—			0.1
Net (loss) income attributable to HBAC	$	(51.2	)	$	(23.9	)	$	3.7		$	20.1		$	(51.3	)

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

~~Six~~Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2011~~ 2011

(In millions)

													Condensed
	HBAC			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			CondensedConsolidatedTotal
				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						Consolidated
Sales	$	—		$	539.3		$	24.3		$	(44.8	)	$	518.8
	HBAC			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Cost of sales		—			490.4			21.7			(44.8	)		467.3
Sales	$	—		$	1,204.1		$	47.1		$	(111.1	)	$	1,140.1
Gross Profit		—			48.9			2.6			—			51.5
Cost of sales		—			1,079.2			40.1			(111.1	)		1,008.2
Restructuring, net		—			3.6			—			—			3.6
Gross Profit		—			124.9			7.0			—			131.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses		0.4			65.5			1.1			—			67.0
Restructuring, net		—			3.8			—			—			3.8
Research and development expenses		—			23.1			—			—			23.1
Selling, general and administrative expenses		0.7			131.9			2.1			—			134.7
Operating (loss) income		(0.4	)		(43.3	)		1.5			—			(42.2	)
Research and development expenses		—			50.9			—			—			50.9
Intercompany interest expense (income), net		0.1			(0.2	)		0.1			—			—
Operating (loss) income		(0.7	)		(61.7	)		4.9			—			(57.5	)
Interest expense, net		31.4			0.9			—			—			32.3
Intercompany interest expense (income), net		0.3			(0.3	)		—			—			—
Other expense (income), net		0.6			(3.4	)		3.1			—			0.3
Interest expense, net		65.0			4.5			—			—			69.5
Nonoperating expense (income), net		32.1			(2.7	)		3.2			—			32.6
Other (income) expense, net		(1.3	)		3.2			(2.7	)		—			(0.8	)
Loss before taxes		(32.5	)		(40.6	)		(1.7	)		—			(74.8	)
Nonoperating expense (income), net		64.0			7.4			(2.7	)		—			68.7
Income tax provision		3.4			9.3			0.5			—			13.2
(Loss) income before taxes		(64.7	)		(69.1	)		7.6			—			(126.2	)
Loss before equity income		(35.9	)		(49.9	)		(2.2	)		—			(88.0	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		(1.8	)		0.8			0.8			—			(0.2	)
Equity loss (income) in subsidiaries		52.1			—			—			(52.1	)		—
(Loss) earnings before equity income		(62.9	)		(69.9	)		6.8			—			(126.0	)
Net (loss) income		(88.0	)		(49.9	)		(2.2	)		52.1			(88.0	)
Equity loss (income) in subsidiaries		63.1			—			—			(63.1	)		—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			0.6			—			0.6
Net (loss) income		(126.0	)		(69.9	)		6.8			63.1			(126.0	)
Net (loss) income attributable to HBAC	$	(88.0	)	$	(49.9	)	$	(2.8	)	$	52.1		$	(88.6	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			0.1			—			0.1
Net (loss) income attributable to HBAC	$	(126.0	)	$	(69.9	)	$	6.7		$	63.1		$	(126.1	)

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

~~Three~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 2730, ~~2010~~ 2011

(In millions)

													Condensed
	HBAC			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			CondensedConsolidatedTotal
				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						Consolidated
Sales	$	—		$	1,743.4		$	71.4		$	(155.9	)	$	1,658.9
	HBAC			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Cost of sales		—			1,569.6			61.8			(155.9	)		1,475.5
Sales	$	—		$	678.3		$	18.2		$	(57.2	)	$	639.3
Gross Profit		—			173.8			9.6			—			183.4
Cost of sales		—			607.4			16.6			(57.2	)		566.8
Restructuring, net		—			7.4			—			—			7.4
Gross Profit		—			70.9			1.6			—			72.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1.1			197.4			3.2			—			201.7
Restructuring, net		—			3.7			—			—			3.7
Research and development expenses		—			74.0			—			—			74.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses		0.4			63.3			1.2			—			64.9
Operating (loss) income		(1.1	)		(105.0	)		6.4			—			(99.7	)
Research and development expenses		—			24.6			—			—			24.6
Intercompany interest expense (income), net		0.4			(0.5	)		0.1			—			—
Operating (loss) income		(0.4	)		(20.7	)		0.4			—			(20.7	)
Interest expense, net		96.4			5.4			—			—			101.8
Intercompany interest expense (income), net		0.1			(0.1	)		—			—			—
Other (income) expense, net		(0.7	)		(0.2	)		0.4			—			(0.5	)
Interest expense, net		35.5			1.2			—			—			36.7
Nonoperating expense net		96.1			4.7			0.5			—			101.3
Other (income) expense, net		(0.6	)		(2.0	)		1.6			—			(1.0	)
(Loss) income before taxes		(97.2	)		(109.7	)		5.9			—			(201.0	)
Nonoperating expense (income), net		35.0			(0.9	)		1.6			—			35.7
Income tax provision		1.6			10.1			1.3			—			13.0
(Loss) income before taxes		(35.4	)		(19.8	)		(1.2	)		—			(56.4	)
(Loss) earnings before equity income		(98.8	)		(119.8	)		4.6			—			(214.0	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		(0.7	)		0.8			0.1			—			0.2
Equity loss (income) in subsidiaries		115.2			—			—			(115.2	)		—
(Loss) earnings before equity income		(34.7	)		(20.6	)		(1.3	)		—			(56.6	)
Net (loss) income		(214.0	)		(119.8	)		4.6			115.2			(214.0	)
Equity loss (income) in subsidiaries		21.9			—			—			(21.9	)		—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			0.7			—			0.7
Net (loss) income		(56.6	)		(20.6	)		(1.3	)		21.9			(56.6	)
Net (loss) income attributable to HBAC	$	(214.0	)	$	(119.8	)	$	3.9		$	115.2		$	(214.7	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			0.2			—			0.2
Net (loss) income attributable to HBAC	$	(56.6	)	$	(20.6	)	$	(1.5	)	$	21.9		$	(56.8	)

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

~~Six~~Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 2730, ~~2010~~ 2010

(In millions)

													Condensed
	HBAC			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			CondensedConsolidatedTotal
				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						Consolidated
Sales	$	—		$	638.1		$	22.8		$	(66.2	)	$	594.7
	HBAC			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Cost of sales		—			629.9			19.8			(66.2	)		583.5
Sales	$	—		$	1,289.9		$	35.1		$	(117.5	)	$	1,207.5
Gross Profit		—			8.2			3.0			—			11.2
Cost of sales		—			1,165.3			31.3			(117.5	)		1,079.1
Restructuring, net		—			1.8			—			—			1.8
Gross Profit		—			124.6			3.8			—			128.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses		0.3			62.6			1.2			—			64.1
Restructuring, net		—			5.6			—			—			5.6
Research and development expenses		—			26.7			—			—			26.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses		0.7			118.6			2.1			—			121.4
Operating (loss) income		(0.3	)		(82.9	)		1.8			—			(81.4	)
Research and development expenses		—			47.2			—			—			47.2
Operating (loss) income		(0.7	)		(46.8	)		1.7			—			(45.8	)
Intercompany interest expense (income), net		0.2			(0.2	)		—			—			—
Interest expense, net		7036.52			1.41			~~1.0~~—			—			7237.93
Other (income) expense, net		(01.48	)		(2.72	)		(1.84	)		—			(1.30	)
Nonoperating expense (income), net		7034.36			(13.51	)		2(1.84	)		—			7136.63
(Loss) income before taxes		(7134.09	)		(4586.30	)		(13.12	)		—			(117.47	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		(0.94	)		21.70			(0.85	)		—			20.69
(Loss) earnings before equity income		(7035.13	)		(4887.0	)		(13.97	)		—			(~~120~~118.06	)
Equity loss (income) in subsidiaries		4983.93			—			—			(4983.93	)		—
Net (loss) income		(~~120~~118.06	)		(4887.0	)		(13.97	)		4983.93			(~~120~~118.06	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			0.31			—			0.31
Net (loss) income attributable to HBAC	$	(~~120~~118.06	)	$	(4887.0	)	$	(23.26	)	$	4983.93		$	(~~120~~118.37	)

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of ~~Cash~~Operations ~~Flows~~

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2011~~ 2010

(In millions)

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						CondensedConsolidated
	HBAC			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			CondensedConsolidatedTotal
	HBAC			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Sales	$	—		$	1,928.0		$	57.9		$	(183.7	)	$	1,802.2
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	34.1		$	(167.1	)	$	2.6		$	—		$	(130.4	)
Cost of sales		—			1,795.2			51.1			(183.7	)		1,662.6
Cash flows from investing activities:
Gross Profit		—			132.8			6.8			—			139.6
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		—			(18.6	)		(0.1	)		—			(18.7	)
Restructuring, net		—			7.4			—			—			7.4
Additions to computer software		—			(13.0	)		—			—			(13.0	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1.0			181.2			3.3			—			185.5
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		—			0.2			—			—			0.2
Research and development expenses		—			73.9			—			—			73.9
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		—			(31.4	)		(0.1	)		—			(31.5	)
Operating (loss) income		(1.0	)		(129.7	)		3.5			—			(127.2	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Intercompany interest expense (income), net		0.4			(0.4	)		—			—			—
Payment of notes payable		(73.2	)		—			—			—			(73.2	)
Interest expense, net		106.7			2.5			1.0			—			110.2
Payment of term loan		(44.5	)		—			—			—			(44.5	)
Other (income) expense, net		(2.2	)		(0.5	)		0.4			—			(2.3	)
Industrial revenue bond receipts (payments)		35.1			(35.1	)		—			—			—
Nonoperating expense (income), net		104.9			1.6			1.4			—			107.9
Net (repayments to) borrowings from HBAC		(231.0	)		233.4			(2.4	)		—			—
(Loss) income before taxes		(105.9	)		(131.3	)		2.1			—			(235.1	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(313.6	)		198.3			(2.4	)		—			(117.7	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		(0.5	)		3.7			0.3			—			3.5
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(279.5	)		(0.2	)		0.1			—			(279.6	)
(Loss) earnings before equity income		(105.4	)		(135.0	)		1.8			—			(238.6	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		413.3			0.2			9.3			—			422.8
Equity loss (income) in subsidiaries		133.2			—			—			(133.2	)		—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	133.8		$	—		$	9.4		$	—		$	143.2
Net (loss) income		(238.6	)		(135.0	)		1.8			133.2			(238.6	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			0.4			—			0.4
Net (loss) income attributable to HBAC	$	(238.6	)	$	(135.0	)	$	1.4		$	133.2		$	(239.0	)

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 2730, ~~2010~~ 2011

(In millions)

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						CondensedConsolidated
	HBAC			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			CondensedConsolidatedTotal
	HBAC			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	219.3		$	(119.0	)	$	(3.4	)	$	(217.9	)	$	(121.0	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	261.9		$	(177.8	)	$	(4.6	)	$	—		$	79.5
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		—			(1328.49	)		(0.14	)		—			(1329.53	)
Additions to computer software		—			(115.56	)		—			—			(115.56	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		—			40.72			—			—			40.72
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(1044.23	)		(0.14	)		—			(1044.37	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of notes payable		(92115.19	)		—			—			—			(92115.19	)
Payment of notes payable		(3.8	)		—			—			—			(3.8	)
Payment of term loan		(44.5	)		—			—			—			(44.5	)
Utilization of revolving credit facility		~~(235~~50.0	)		—			—			—			~~(235~~50.0	)
Industrial revenue bond receipts (payments)		3835.60			(3835.50	)		—			—			~~0.1~~—
Net (repayments to) borrowings from HBAC		(~~230~~416.28	)		~~226~~198.51			31.78			—216.9			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(~~522~~492.52	)		~~188~~163.01			31.78			—216.9			(~~330~~110.84	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(~~260~~272.69	)		—(0.2	)		(12.0	)		—(1.0	)		(~~261~~276.61	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		~~562~~413.03			0.2			69.63			—			~~568~~422.8
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	~~301~~140.4		$	~~0.2~~—		$	57.63		$	—(1.0	)	$	~~307~~146.27

Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

(In millions)


	HBAC			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Condensed Consolidated Total
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	214.5		$	(160.8	)	$	(1.0	)	$	—	$	52.7

Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		—			(23.2	)		(0.1	)		—		(23.3	)
Additions to computer software		—			(4.0	)		—			—		(4.0	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		—			4.7			—			—		4.7

Net cash used in investing activities		—			(22.5	)		(0.1	)		—		(22.6	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of notes payable		(100.1	)		—			—			—		(100.1	)
Payment of term loan		(11.3	)		—			—			—		(11.3	)
Utilization of revolving credit facility		(235.0	)		—			—			—		(235.0	)
Industrial revenue bond receipts (payments)		38.6			(38.5	)		—			—		0.1
Net (repayments to) borrowings from HBAC		(222.8	)		221.7			1.1			—		—

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(530.6	)		183.2			1.1			—		(346.3	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(316.1	)		(0.1	)		—			—		(316.2	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		562.0			0.2			6.6			—		568.8

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	245.9		$	0.1		$	6.6		$	—	$	252.6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and ~~June~~September 2730, 2010, reflects the business of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (“HBAC”). The terms “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company” and “Hawker Beechcraft” refer to HBAC and its subsidiaries.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

All statements that are not reported financial results or other historical information are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements including, for example, statements about our business outlook, our liquidity, our products, including the timing of new product introductions, and the markets in which we operate, including growth of our various markets and our expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, prospects, and assumptions for future events or performance. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s assumptions and assessments in light of past experience and trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other relevant factors. They are also based on management’s expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by, the forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described or implied in the forward-looking statements are the substantial leverage and debt service resulting from our indebtedness; general business and economic conditions; competition in our existing and future markets; disruption in supply from key vendors; ~~work~~disruptions ~~stoppages~~to at our operations ~~facilities;~~due to our computer system upgrade during the ~~substantial~~ ~~leverage~~three months ended September 30, 2011 and ~~debt~~any ~~service~~impact ~~resulting~~that such ~~from~~upgrade may have had on our ~~indebtedness~~internal controls; production delays resulting from lack of regulatory certifications; ~~general~~work ~~business~~stoppages ~~and~~at ~~economic conditions; competition in~~ our ~~existing~~operations ~~and future markets~~facilities; lack of market acceptance of our products and services; loss or retirement of key executives; and other risks disclosed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our Company

Hawker Beechcraft is a ~~world-~~leading manufacturer of business, special mission and trainer/attack aircraft; designing, marketing and supporting aviation products and services for businesses, governments and individuals worldwide. ~~The~~We ~~Company~~have ~~leads~~an ~~the~~extensive ~~industry with a~~ global network of more than 100 factory-owned and authorized service centers to support an installed fleet of more than 37,000 aircraft.

Our business was formerly owned by Raytheon Company. On March 26, 2007, Hawker Beechcraft, Inc., purchased Raytheon Aircraft Acquisition Company, LLC (which has been renamed Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC) and substantially all of the assets of Raytheon Aircraft Services Limited from Raytheon Company and some of its affiliates. ~~We refer to this transaction when we use~~ (the ~~term~~ “Acquisition”). Following the Acquisition, Hawker Beechcraft, Inc., contributed the equity interest of the entity purchasing the assets of Raytheon Aircraft Services Limited to us.

Our Products and Services

We conduct our business through three segments: Business and General Aviation, Trainer/Attack Aircraft and Customer Support. Certain reclassifications have been made between the Business and General Aviation and Customer Support segments to conform to the current period presentation, which reflects the change in responsibility over a specific product support program. A description of our business segments is set forth below.

Business and General Aviation

Our Business and General Aviation segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets and delivers commercial and specially modified general aviation aircraft. The segment manufactures one of the broadest product lines in the industry, including business jet, turboprop and piston aircraft, under the Hawker® and Beechcraft® brands. We believe our extensive product line, ~~as described below,~~ enables us to attract and retain a broad range of corporate, fractional and charter operators and individual customers worldwide. Our Business and General Aviation segment sells aircraft through various distribution channels, including direct single unit retail sales, fleet (multiple units) sales to larger operators and our authorized dealer network.

~~Trainer/Attack~~27 ~~Aircraft~~

Our Trainer/Attack Aircraft segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells military training aircraft and spares. Its customers include the U.S. and foreign governments. The segment manufactures our primary military trainer aircraft, the T-6 Texan II (“T-6”). In 1995, Raytheon Aircraft was awarded the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Navy’s Joint Primary Aircraft Training System

~~(“JPATS”)~~Trainer/Attack program. Under this program, we continue to be the sole source provider to the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Navy of their primary military trainer aircraft. Through December 31, 2010, Hawker Beechcraft and Raytheon Aircraft have delivered 556 trainer aircraft under JPATS contracts, including the 60 T-6B aircraft with upgraded avionics to the U.S. Navy. In addition, HBC has sold and delivered 110 trainer aircraft to international customers, including four T-6C aircraft, the most recent variant of the T-6 trainer. We continue to market the T-6 trainer to certain foreign governments and anticipate additional international awards in the near future. International customers made up 20% of the deliveries in 2010.

WeOur ~~continue~~Trainer/Attack toAircraft ~~invest~~segment indesigns, ~~the~~develops, ~~AT-6~~manufactures, ~~the~~markets ~~Light~~and ~~Attack~~sells military training aircraft and spares. Its ~~being~~customers ~~offered~~include bythe ~~Hawker~~U.S. ~~Beechcraft~~and foreign governments. ~~This~~The segment manufactures our primary military trainer aircraft, ~~offers~~the ~~integrated~~T-6 ~~surveillance~~Texan ~~equipment~~II (“T-6”). In 1995, ~~data~~Raytheon ~~link~~Aircraft was awarded the U.S. Air Force and ~~“hard~~the ~~point”~~U.S. ~~wings~~Navy’s ~~capable~~Joint ofPrimary Aircraft ~~carrying~~Training ~~light~~System ~~attack~~(“JPATS”) ~~weapons~~program. ~~The~~Under ~~prototype~~this ~~completed~~program, ~~its~~we ~~initial~~continue ~~flight~~to ~~tests~~be inthe sole source provider to the ~~fall~~U.S. ofAir ~~2009~~Force and the U.S. Navy of their primary military trainer aircraft. Through September 30, 2011, Hawker ~~performed~~Beechcraft ~~successfully~~and atRaytheon Aircraft have delivered 600 trainer aircraft under JPATS contracts, including the 104 T-6B aircraft with upgraded avionics to the U.S. ~~Department~~Navy. In addition, HBC has sold and delivered 126 trainer aircraft to international customers, including 20 T-6C aircraft, the most recent variant of ~~Defense~~the ~~Joint~~T-6 ~~Expeditionary~~trainer. ~~Force~~We ~~Experiment~~continue ~~(JEFX)~~to market the T-6 trainer to certain foreign governments and anticipate additional international awards in ~~2010~~the near future. International customers made up 27% of the deliveries through September 30, 2011.

We continue to invest in the AT-6, the light attack aircraft being offered by Hawker Beechcraft. This aircraft offers integrated surveillance equipment, data link and “hard point” wings capable of carrying light attack weapons. The prototype completed its initial flight tests in the fall of 2009 and performed successfully at the U.S. Department of Defense Joint Expeditionary Force Experiment in 2010.

Our Trainer/Attack Aircraft segment also provides training and logistics support and aftermarket parts and services. We expect the U.S. Government to continue to require product support for T-6 trainers through 2050.

Customer Support

Our Customer Support segment provides parts and maintenance services to our installed fleet of more than 37,000 aircraft. We sell parts from our headquarters in Wichita, Kansas and operate distribution warehouses in Dallas, Texas,; London, England,; Dubai, United Arab Emirates,; and Singapore. Support services include maintenance, repairs and refurbishment, as well as airframe and avionics modifications and upgrades. Our service and support network consists of the largest number of jet and turboprop service centers in the industry, including 10more than 100 company-owned ~~service centers in the U.S., the United Kingdom~~ and ~~Mexico, as well as approximately 100~~ company-authorized third party service centers in over 3230 countries.

Results of Operations

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011			~~June~~September 2730,2010			~~June~~September 30,2011			~~June~~September 2730,2010
Sales	$	~~581~~518.78		$	~~639~~594.37		$	1,~~140~~658.19		$	1,~~207~~802.52
Cost of sales		~~502~~467.3			~~566~~583.85			1,~~008~~475.25			1,~~079~~662.16
Gross margin		7951.45			7211.52			~~131~~183.94			~~128~~139.46
Restructuring, net		2.3.6			31.78			37.84			57.64
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6867.0			64.91			~~134~~201.7			~~121~~185.45
Research and development expenses		2823.71			2426.67			5074.90			4773.29
Operating loss		(1942.62	)		(2081.74	)		(5799.57	)		(45127.82	)
Interest expense		32.93			3637.85			69102.81			73110.16
Interest income		~~(0.1~~—	)		(0.12	)		(0.3	)		(0.24	)
Other income, net		—			(1.0	)		(0.8	)		(1.3	)
Other expense (income), net		0.3			(1.0	)		(0.5	)		(2.3	)
Nonoperating expense, net		32.86			3536.73			68101.73			71107.69
Loss before taxes		(5274.48	)		(56117.47	)		(~~126~~201.20	)		(~~117~~235.41	)
Income taxes provision (benefit)		(1.2	)		0.2			(0.2	)		2.6
Income taxes provision		13.2			0.9			13.0			3.5
Net loss		(5188.20	)		(56118.6	)		(~~126~~214.0	)		(~~120~~238.06	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		0.16			0.21			0.17			0.34
Net loss attributable to parent company	$	(5188.36	)	$	(56118.87	)	$	(~~126~~214.17	)	$	(~~120~~239.30	)

~~Sales~~28

Sales decreased $57.6 million or 9.0% in the three months ended June 30, 2011, and $67.4 million or 5.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. The decreases reflect the continued weakness in the general aviation market and recent supply issues discussed subsequently.

Sales

Sales decreased $75.9 million or 12.8% in the three months ended September 30, 2011, and $143.3 million or 8.0% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. The decreases reflect the continued weakness in the general aviation market and recent supply issues discussed subsequently.

The following table summarizes our sales by segment, which are described subsequently:

Three Months Ended

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended

(In millions)

~~June~~September 30,2011

~~June~~September 2730,2010

~~June~~September 30,2011

~~June~~September 2730,2010

Business and General Aviation

~~291~~283.92

~~353~~336.58

~~578~~861.13

~~688~~1,025.64

Trainer/Attack Aircraft

~~177~~133.57

~~184~~161.81

~~354~~487.18

~~327~~488.23

Customer Support

~~141~~126.27

~~134~~135.56

~~260~~387.95

~~250~~385.28

Eliminations

(2824.98

)

(3338.58

)

(5377.07

)

(5897.53

)

Total

~~581~~518.78

~~639~~594.37

1,~~140~~658.19

1,~~207~~802.52

Business and General Aviation

Business and General Aviation sales decreased $6153.6 million or 1715.49% in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, when compared to ~~the~~ the corresponding period in 2010. ~~This~~Revenues ~~decrease is in large part the result of a $35.8 million reduction in revenues~~ from ~~the sale of used aircraft that we received as trade-ins during~~ new aircraft sales ~~transactions. In addition, revenues from new aircraft sales~~ decreased $2338.2 million or 813.35% to $~~257~~245.84 million in this period from $~~281~~283.06 million in the three months ended ~~June 27,~~September 2010, primarily reflecting a reduction in ~~the~~ deliveries of ~~Hawker~~King Air ~~4000 jet~~ aircraft ~~and other aircraft~~, as shown in a following table. We are ~~also~~ experiencing supply disruptions that have affected our production of Hawker 4000, ~~and~~ King Air ~~aircraft~~ and ~~deferred~~Piston ~~some~~aircraft. ~~deliveries~~The of Hawker 4000 ~~jet~~software ~~aircraft~~related supply disruption was substantially resolved in August 2011 when we received FAA approval. This has allowed us to resume deliveries in the ~~second~~United ~~quarter~~States. We ~~currently~~are ~~anticipate resolution~~still ofawaiting ~~the~~approvals from comparable agencies in other countries before delivering additional Hawker 4000s in these areas. The supply ~~issues~~disruptions ~~during~~related ~~the~~to ~~third~~King Air and Piston aircraft have not yet been resolved and we expect these disruptions will continue in the fourth ~~quarters~~quarter of ~~2011,~~this ~~however~~year. In addition, we ~~also~~experienced ~~expect~~an ~~they~~$11.6 ~~will~~million ~~result~~reduction in ~~fewer~~revenues ~~deliveries~~from the sale of ~~Hawker~~used ~~4000~~aircraft ~~and~~that ~~King~~we ~~Air~~received as trade-ins during new aircraft insales ~~the~~transactions ~~second~~when ~~half~~compared ofto the ~~year~~corresponding period in 2010.

Business and General Aviation sales decreased $~~110~~164.51 million or 16.0% in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding period in 2010. ~~This~~Revenues ~~decrease is partially the result of a $56.4 million reduction in revenues~~ from ~~the sale of used aircraft that we received as trade-ins during~~ new aircraft sales ~~transactions. In addition, revenues from new aircraft~~ ~~sales~~ decreased $4583.0 million or 810.20% to $~~501~~746.16 million in ~~the~~this ~~six~~period ~~months ended June 30, 2011,~~ from $~~546~~829.16 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June 27,~~September 2010. ~~Our~~This ~~new~~decrease ~~aircraft~~is ~~revenues decreased in the six month comparison~~ primarily as the result of fewer jet aircraft deliveries of the Hawker 4000s, Hawker 900XPs, and Hawker 400XPs. In addition, we experienced a $68.0 million reduction in revenues from the sale of used aircraft that we received as trade-ins during new aircraft sales transactions when compared to the corresponding period in 2010.

The following table summarizes Business and General Aviation new aircraft deliveries:

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,2011		June 27,2010		June 30,2011		June 27,2010
	September 30,2011		September 30,2010		September 30,2011		September 30,2010
Hawker 4000		13		41		47		89
Hawker 900XP		45		35		611		1116
Hawker 800XP/850XP		—		1—		1		1
Hawker 750		21		1		45		12
Hawker 400XP		—		21		1		34
Premier		3—		2		5		35
King Air		2520		2426		4969		3965
Pistons		9		1713		1928		2235
Total		4438		5449		89127		88137

~~Trainer/Attack~~29 ~~Aircraft~~

Trainer/Attack Aircraft sales decreased $7.3 million or 4.0% in the three months ended June 30, 2011, and increased $26.9 million or 8.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. These variances reflect the comparative volumes of aircraft sold in the corresponding periods, as disclosed on the following table. The increase in international sales, related to international trainer contracts that were awarded in late 2009, are offset by lower domestic sales related to the JPATS contract. Revenue is recorded on essentially all contracts in the Trainer/Attack Aircraft segment using the cost-to-cost method to measure progress towards completion. Accordingly, the majority of Trainer/Attack Aircraft segment sales, including estimated earned gross margin, are recorded as costs are incurred.

Trainer/Attack Aircraft

Trainer/Attack Aircraft sales decreased $27.4 million or 17.0% in the three months ended September 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding period in 2010. The decrease in the current quarter is primarily the result of a decrease in spare parts and training system sales of $13.9 million. In addition, we experienced a decrease of $9.8 million due to slower production levels resulting from fewer aircraft under contract in the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the corresponding period in 2010. Revenue is recorded on essentially all contracts in the Trainer/Attack Aircraft segment using a percentage of completion method to measure progress towards completion. Accordingly, the majority of Trainer/Attack Aircraft segment sales, including estimated earned gross margin, are recorded as costs are incurred. Trainer/Attack Aircraft sales decreased $0.5 million or 0.1% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding period in 2010.

The following table summarizes Trainer/Attack Aircraft new aircraft deliveries:

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,2011		June 27,2010		June 30,2011		June 27,2010
	September 30,2011		September 30,2010		September 30,2011		September 30,2010
T-6A Domestic		—		8—		—		9
T-6B Domestic		17		14		30		29
T-6A International		—		9		—		9
T-6C International		4		—		12		—
T-6B Domestic		14		10		44		39
Total		21		22		42		38
T-6C International		4		1		16		1
Total		18		20		60		58

Customer Support

Customer Support segment sales are principally comprised of the sale of spare parts and maintenance services to existing aircraft operators. Sales ~~increased~~decreased $68.79 million or 56.06% in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and increased $101.7 million or 40.34% in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. The decrease in revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2011 is primarily ~~due~~the toresult ~~revenue~~of ~~growth~~a attemporary disruption in our ~~company~~business ~~owned~~related ~~service~~to ~~centers~~the implementation of our computer system upgrade. ~~These~~This ~~revenues~~disruption ~~have~~was ~~been~~short ~~largely driven~~in bynature ~~improved~~and ~~product~~we ~~offerings~~have resumed ordinary operations.

Restructuring, net

We recorded pre-tax charges of $2.3.6 million and $37.84 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, as compared to $31.7 8 million and $57.64 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. These charges result from restructuring actions announced in 2009 and 2010, which were taken as part of our ongoing cost reduction initiatives and in response to lower aircraft production rates that resulted from depressed demand in the general aviation industry and primarily relate to employee severance costs. We currently anticipate these restructuring activities will continue through 2012.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $6867.0 million and $~~134~~201.7 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, as compared to $64.91 million and $~~121~~185.45 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. The higher expenses in 2011 reflect the expansion of our global sales force.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense totaled $2823.71 million and $5074.90 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, as compared to $2426.67 million and $4773.29 million in the three months and nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. We continue to focus our research and development efforts on our Business and General Aviation and Trainer/Attack segments. The 2011 expenses reflect the benefit of $1.0.9 million and $12.87 million recorded in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, relating to the incentive package agreement reached with the State of Kansas in December 2010.

Operating (Loss) Income

The following table summarizes Operating (loss) income by segment:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(In millions)	June 30,2011			June 27,2010			June 30,2011			June 27,2010
Operating (Loss) Income:
Business and General Aviation	$	(64.9	)	$	(73.3	)	$	(151.4	)	$	(138.9	)
Trainer/Attack Aircraft		19.3			32.0			45.8			52.1
Customer Support		26.1			20.7			48.2			41.1
Eliminations		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)
Total	$	(19.6	)	$	(20.7	)	$	(57.5	)	$	(45.8	)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Operating (Loss) Income:
Business and General Aviation	$	(75.4	)	$	(124.5	)	$	(226.8	)	$	(263.4	)
Trainer/Attack Aircraft		12.6			20.2			58.4			72.3
Customer Support		20.7			23.0			68.9			64.1
Eliminations		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)

Total	$	(42.2	)	$	(81.4	)	$	(99.7	)	$	(127.2	)

Business and General Aviation

Operating loss decreased $849.41 million or 1139.54% in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, as compared to the corresponding period in in 2010. ~~The~~This ~~effect~~decrease is primarily the result of ~~decreased~~recording ~~sales~~lower charges in the current quarter for loss making aircraft and the Hawker 4000 upgrade and enhancement program. We recorded an aggregate of $11.9 million for these items during ~~this~~the ~~period,~~three months ~~described~~ended ~~previously~~September 30, ~~was~~2011, ~~mitigated~~as byopposed anto ~~improved~~$67.1 ~~product~~million ~~mix~~in ~~that~~the ~~resulted~~corresponding period in 2010. In addition, we recorded a charge of $32.82 million ~~improvement~~related to the Hawker 400 line in the ~~related~~three ~~gross~~months ~~margins.~~ended ~~Increased~~September 30, ~~selling~~2011 ~~expenses~~as ~~associated~~opposed ~~with~~to $11.6 million in the ~~expansion of~~corresponding ~~our~~period ~~global~~in ~~sales~~2010. ~~force~~The ~~were~~decrease in loss was primarily offset by ~~lower~~forfeited ~~general~~deposits ~~and~~of ~~administrative~~$9.1 ~~expenses~~million recognized as income in the three months ended September 30, 2010 that did not recur in the corresponding period in 2011.

Operating loss ~~increased~~decreased $1236.56 million or 9 13.09% in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, as compared to the corresponding period in 2010. In addition to the ~~decreased~~lower ~~sales~~charges ~~during~~discussed ~~this period, described~~ previously, the ~~increased~~resolution ~~operating~~of ~~loss~~our ~~also~~dispute ~~reflects~~with ~~higher~~Airbus ~~selling~~during ~~expenses associated with~~ the ~~expansion~~three ofmonths ~~our~~ended ~~global~~March 31, ~~sales~~2011, ~~force~~was ~~and~~approximately ~~expenditures~~$6.0 ~~related~~million toless ~~factory~~than ~~operations~~the ~~cost~~amount ~~reduction~~previously ~~initiatives~~accrued. The ~~increase in operating loss was partially offset by a~~ positive financial impact of ~~recording~~this ~~the~~ resolution ofalso ~~our~~contributed ~~dispute with Airbus. The final award~~ to ~~Airbus was approximately $6.0 million less than~~ the ~~amount~~decrease ~~previously~~in ~~accrued~~operating loss.

Our operating results continue to be negatively impacted by depressed demand and margins for our product within the Business and General Aviation segment. Adverse changes in operating results could negatively impact the fair value of our tradenames and result in impairment charges in the fourth quarter.

Trainer/Attack Aircraft

Operating income decreased $~~12.~~7.6 million or 3937.76% in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and ~~decreased~~ $613.39 million or 1219.12% in the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010,. These decreases primarily reflect the reduced spare parts and training system sales and slowing of production activity related to ~~the~~our ~~sales~~contracts, ~~volumes~~as discussed previously. The use of ~~the~~a ~~cost-to-cost~~percentage of completion method of revenue recognition causes gross margin to be recorded based on management’s estimate of total contract revenue and total contract cost at completion. As estimates are updated, any impact on revenue and gross margin as a result of the change in estimate is reflected in current earnings on a cumulative catch-up basis. Favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $4.8.0 million and $1018.5 million were recorded in the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, as compared to $125.21million ~~million~~ and $1520.89 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. We also incurred higher development costs primarily for the AT-6 of $20.36 million and $23.73 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, when compared to corresponding periods in 2010.

Customer Support

Operating income ~~increased~~decreased $52.43 million or 2610.10% in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and increased $74.1 8 million or 177.35% in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. ~~These~~The ~~improvements~~decrease ~~are~~in ~~primarily~~the ~~due~~three months ended September 30, 2011, reflects the temporary disruption in our business attributable to the implementation of our computer system upgrade discussed previously. This decrease offset the operating income increase experienced in the first half of 2011 primarily as a result of improved product offerings, strategic pricing initiatives and a favorable shift in product mix toward higher margin proprietary parts sales.

Nonoperating Expense, net

We recorded nonoperating expenses of $32.86 million and $68101.73 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, as compared to $3536.73 million and $71107.69 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010. The reductions in nonoperating expenses are primarily due to decreases in interest expense of $35.92 million and $38.35 million in the respective periods that are largely the result of a scheduled reduction in the notional value of one of our interest rate swap agreements at the end of 2010. The decrease in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, was partially offset by $2.5 million of interest expense recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011, related to the resolution of our dispute with Airbus.

~~Provision~~31 ~~for Income Taxes~~

Our effective tax rate was 2.3% and 0.2% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to negative 0.4% and negative 2.2% in the three and six months ended June 27, 2010. These effective tax rates reflect the impact of the full valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred income tax assets. The primary difference between the effective tax rate and statutory tax rate in the jurisdictions in which we operate is a result of the valuation allowance against our net U.S. deferred tax assets.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate was negative 17.6% and negative 6.5% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, and includes the discrete impact of the disproportionate tax effects from the cash flow hedges. Our effective tax rate was negative 0.8% and negative 1.5% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. These effective tax rates reflect the impact of the full valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred income tax assets. The primary difference between the effective tax rate and statutory tax rate in the jurisdictions in which we operate is a result of the valuation allowance against our net U.S. deferred tax assets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow Analysis

The following table summarizes sources and uses of funds:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011			~~June~~September 2730,2010
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(~~130~~121.40	)	$	7952.57
Net cash used in investing activities		(3144.57	)		(1022.36	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~117~~110.74	)		(~~330~~346.83	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(~~279~~276.61	)	$	(~~261~~316.62	)

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

The net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to the decreased ~~earnings~~sales discussed previously in combination with an increase in in inventory balances,. ~~decreases~~These inchanges ~~advance~~were ~~payment~~partially ~~balances~~offset ~~and~~by ~~management~~an ~~incentive~~increase ~~plan,~~in ~~performance~~accounts ~~pay~~payable ~~outflows related to meeting target goals for the 2010 fiscal year and increased defined benefit plan contributions~~balances.

Net cash used in investing activities related primarily to expenditures for property, plant and equipment and the implementation of new information systems software throughout the company.

Net cash used in financing activities represents the prepayment of principal toward our senior secured and incremental term loans as well as payments on notes payable used to finance certain aircraft engine purchases.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2010

The net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a reduction in inventory and an increase in accounts payable balances.

Net cash used in investing activities related primarily to capital expenditures for equipment being used to support the AT-6 development program in our Trainer/Attack Aircraft segment as well as tooling in our Business and General Aviation segment.

Net cash used in financing activities represents the repayment of $235.0 million on the revolving credit facility as well as payments on notes payable used to finance certain aircraft engine purchases.

Capital Resources

The following table summarizes our capital resources:

(In millions)	~~June~~September 30,2011			December 31,2010
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~143~~146.27		$	422.8
Total debt		2,~~096~~144.47			2,129.7
Net debt (total debt less cash and cash equivalents)		1,953.2			1,706.9
Net debt (a)		1,998.0			1,706.9
Total deficit		(~~317~~383.32	)		(214.4	)
Total capitalization (debt plus equity)		1,779.1			1,915.3
Total capitalization (b)		1,761.5			1,915.3
Net capitalization (debt plus equity less cash and cash equivalents)		1,635.9			1,492.5
Net capitalization (c)		1,614.8			1,492.5
Debt to total capitalization		118	%		111	%
Total debt to total capitalization		122	%		111	%
Net debt to net capitalization		~~119~~124	%		114	%

~~Our~~(a) ~~total~~Difference ~~indebtedness~~between atTotal ~~June 30,~~debt ~~2011,~~and ~~included~~Cash ~~$69.5~~and ~~million~~cash ~~of short-term obligations payable to a third party under a financing arrangement.~~ equivalents

In(b) ~~accordance~~Summation ~~with~~of ~~our~~Total debt ~~agreement, we were required to make a prepayment of principal toward our senior secured~~ and ~~incremental~~Total term loans as a result of our excess cash flow for the year 2010. We paid $44.5 million of principal on March 2, 2011, which we elected to apply against our principal repayment schedules. This election eliminates required principal payments set forth in our repayment schedules until the final payments due at maturity. deficit

31(c) Difference between Total capitalization and Cash and cash equivalents

~~Table~~Our total indebtedness at September 30, 2011, included $67.2 million of ~~Contents~~short-term obligations payable to a third party under a financing arrangement and $50.0 million drawn under our revolving credit facility.

AsIn ofaccordance ~~June 30,~~with ~~2011~~our credit agreement, we ~~had~~were ~~$239.2~~required ~~million~~to ~~available~~make ~~under~~a ~~our~~prepayment ~~revolving~~of ~~credit~~principal toward our ~~facility,~~senior ~~net~~secured and incremental term loans as a result of our excess cash flow for the year 2010. We paid $144.15 million of ~~outstanding~~principal ~~letters~~on ofMarch 2, ~~credit~~2011, which we elected to apply against our principal repayment schedules. This election eliminates required principal payments set forth in our repayment schedules until the final payments due at maturity.

WeAs ~~have~~of September 30, ~~used~~2011, we had $41189.43 million ofavailable ~~the~~under our revolving credit facility, net of $751.01 million ~~available under~~of ~~our~~outstanding ~~synthetic~~letters ~~letter~~ of credit ~~facility~~and as$50.0 ofmillion ~~June 30,~~drawn ~~2011~~under our revolving credit facility.

We ~~believe we~~ have ~~sufficient~~used liquidity to meet our cash requirements for the next twelve months. However, we have experienced supply disruptions that have affected our production and deferred some deliveries. In addition, the third quarter is historically a slow period for aircraft deliveries, and we are continuing to invest in projects to improve efficiency. Accordingly, on July 21, 2011, we drew $2540.01 million onof ~~our~~the ~~revolving credit facility and on August 5, 2011, we drew on additional~~ $2575.0 million inavailable ~~order~~under toour ~~keep~~synthetic aletter ~~prudent amount~~ of ~~cash~~ oncredit ~~hand~~facility as we work through the supply issues, seasonal slowdown and working capital swings driven by our transformative projects. We may make additional draws on our revolver, which currently has approximately $189.2 million of ~~availability~~September 30, ~~in order to maintain an appropriate supply of cash~~2011. ~~Additional economic deterioration may further depress the business and general aviation market and delays in resolving supply disruptions could slow deliveries of certain aircraft, which could impact~~ ~~our future ability to meet our liquidity needs.~~

We believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash requirements through the end of 2011. However, we have experienced supply disruptions that have affected our production and deferred deliveries of aircraft, which we expect to continue in the fourth quarter. The third quarter is historically a slow period for aircraft deliveries, and we are continuing to invest in projects to improve efficiency. Accordingly, we have drawn on our revolving credit facility in order to keep a prudent amount of cash on hand as we work through the supply issues, seasonal slowdown and working capital swings driven by our transformative projects. We may make additional draws on our revolver, which currently has approximately $189.3 million of availability, in order to maintain an appropriate supply of cash. Our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt, fund working capital and make capital expenditures depends on our future performance. The fourth quarter has historically been the quarter during which we have generated the largest amount of cash. Any significant change in this pattern, whether due to additional economic deterioration causing further depression in the business and general aviation market, due to delays in our ability to resolve supply disruptions resulting in slower deliveries of aircraft, or any other circumstances could impact our future ability to meet our liquidity needs.

Debt Covenants

The indentures governing the notes and the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit include usual and customary covenants for notes and ~~credits~~debt of this type. These covenants include, but are not limited to, covenants limiting debt, investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, liens, mergers, asset sales, and material changes in our business or our subsidiaries. ~~The~~ The credit agreement also includes financial covenants ~~for~~related to our liquidity and ~~minimum~~adjusted EBITDA. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we continued to be in full compliance with all covenants contained in our debt agreements.

Seasonality

In recent years, a significant portion of our Business and General Aviation aircraft deliveries have occurred during the fourth quarter of the year. Given the long lead time involved in the production of aircraft, it is necessary to build aircraft throughout the year in support of the higher fourth quarter delivery volume. As a result, our working capital levels typically rise during the first three quarters of the year and are reduced significantly during the fourth quarter. Any disruptions to our business or delivery schedule during the year, including any continued supply disruptions, could have a materially adverse effect on our full-year financial operating results.

Backlog

Orders for aircraft are included in backlog upon receipt of an executed contract. Our backlog was $1.43 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, of which 4227.19% represented orders expected to be delivered beyond the next twelve months. Our backlog includes significant orders with the U.S. government.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We use customary off-balance sheet arrangements, such as operating leases and letters of credit, in the normal course of business. We may, from time to time, instruct banks to issue letters of credit on our behalf to support cash deposits and to guarantee the performance of our contractual obligations. None of the arrangements has or is likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. See Note 15 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to “Summary of Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There has been no material change in our exposure to market risk in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. For a discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our ~~Chief~~Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, our ~~Chief~~Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial ~~Officer~~ Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the ~~Chief~~Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we implemented a computer system upgrade. As a result, we have modified certain controls to address changes in system and operating procedures. We continue to conduct post-implementation monitoring and testing of internal controls over financial reporting in connection with the implementation of the new computer system upgrade. There were no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We are from time to time subject to, and are presently involved in, litigation or other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We are a defendant in a number of product liability lawsuits with respect to accidents involving our aircraft that allege personal injury and property damage and seek substantial recoveries, including, in some cases, punitive and exemplary damages. We maintain partial insurance coverage against such claims at a level determined by management to be prudent (see Note 15 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). In addition, Raytheon Company retained all product liability claims arising from incidents occurring after April 1, 2001 until March 25, 2007. We cannot predict the outcome of these matters or whether Raytheon will uphold its indemnity obligations (see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010). We are at risk of losses and adverse publicity stemming from any accident involving aircraft for which we hold design authority. The outcome of litigation in which we have been named as a defendant is unpredictable and an adverse decision in any such matter could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

In34 July 2007, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) informed us that it had initiated an investigation concerning compliance by one of our suppliers with part specifications involving our T-6A trainers and certain special mission King Air aircraft sold to the U.S. government. HBAC cooperated with the FAA investigation and conducted its own supplier quality audits. HBAC believes the alleged non-compliance condition does not impact safety of flight. On June 17, 2008, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Kansas notified us that the FAA had referred a civil penalty matter arising out of its investigation to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for enforcement and that the FAA had recommended imposing civil penalties against HBAC. HBAC has reached a settlement with the FAA with respect to this matter. It does not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. The settlement was neither an admission of liability or wrongdoing by HBAC, and there was no finding of any regulatory or other violation.

In April 2009, HBAC received a complaint naming it as a defendant in a qui tam lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The complaint alleged violations of the civil False Claims Act (“FCA”) arising from alleged supplier non-conformance with specifications and HBAC’s alleged inadequate quality control over the supplier’s manufacturing process on certain T-6 and King Air aircraft delivered to the government. The lawsuit, United States ex rel. Minge, et al. v. Turbine Engine Components Technologies Corporation, et al., No. 07-1212-MLB (D. Kan.), alleged FCA causes of action against HBAC (and its predecessor, Raytheon Aircraft Company) and FCA causes of action, retaliation causes of action, and a tort cause of action against TECT Aerospace Wellington, Inc. (“TECT”), an HBAC supplier, and various affiliates of TECT. On February 3, 2010, the District of Kansas court granted HBAC’s motion for summary judgment in the qui tam case. The Court permitted the FCA retaliation cause of action to proceed against TECT. On June 1, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider the order granting summary judgment and a motion to amend the complaint. On August 2, 2010, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the order but granted plaintiffs’ leave to file an amended complaint. On September 29, 2010, HBAC filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses. Discovery is pending pursuant to a November 12, 2010 Scheduling Order and an April 12, 2011 Second Scheduling Order, and per a July 20, 2011 Order, fact discovery on the limited issues currently before the Court shall be completed by November 30, 2011. No accruals have been recorded

~~for~~allege ~~this~~personal ~~matter~~injury asand property damage and seek substantial recoveries, including, in some cases, punitive and exemplary damages. We maintain partial insurance coverage against such claims at a level determined by management to be prudent (see Note 15 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). In addition, Raytheon Company retained all product liability claims arising from incidents occurring after April 1, 2001 until March 25, 2007. We cannot predict the outcome of ~~June~~these matters or whether Raytheon Company will uphold its indemnity obligations (see Item 301A, ~~2011~~“Risk Factors” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010). We are at risk of losses and adverse publicity stemming from any accident involving aircraft for which we hold design authority. The outcome of litigation in which we have been named as a defendant is unpredictable and an adverse decision in any such matter could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

OnIn ~~April 7,~~July ~~2009~~2007, ~~Airbus UK~~the ~~Ltd.~~Federal Aviation Administration (“~~Airbus~~FAA”) ~~filed~~informed aus ~~Request~~that ~~for~~it ~~Arbitration~~had ~~with~~initiated ~~the~~an ~~International~~investigation ~~Chamber~~concerning ofcompliance ~~Commerce~~by inone ~~Paris~~of ~~initiating~~our ~~proceedings~~suppliers ~~against~~with ~~HBAC.~~part ~~Airbus~~specifications ~~alleged~~involving ~~that HBAC breached its obligations under the Airframe Purchase and Support Agreement~~our ~~dated~~T-6A ~~August 19,~~trainers ~~1998 between Airbus~~ and ~~HBAC.~~certain ~~More~~special ~~particularly,~~mission ~~Airbus~~King ~~claimed~~Air ~~that~~aircraft itsold ~~and HBAC reached agreement in April of 2008 for HBAC~~ to ~~purchase increased volumes of fuselages, wings, track kits and spare parts (collectively~~ the ~~“shipsets”)~~ inU.S. ~~the 2008 to 2010 time frame~~government. ~~Airbus further alleged that (i) beginning in late 2008,~~ HBAC ~~unilaterally~~cooperated ~~reduced~~with the ~~number~~FAA ofinvestigation ~~shipsets that it would purchase in breach of its contractual obligations~~ and ~~(ii) that Airbus~~ ~~made~~conducted ~~substantial investments to expand~~ its ~~production~~own ~~capacity~~supplier atquality ~~the~~audits. ~~urging of~~ HBAC ~~and~~believes inthe ~~reliance~~alleged onnon-compliance ~~alleged~~condition ~~expanded~~does ~~commitments~~not ~~from~~impact safety ~~HBAC~~of flight. On ~~December~~June 2317, ~~2009~~2008, ~~Airbus~~the ~~filed~~U.S. ~~its~~Attorney’s ~~Statement~~Office offor ~~Claim,~~the ~~which~~District ~~sought an award~~ of ~~damages~~Kansas ~~potentially~~notified inus ~~excess~~that ofthe ~~£40~~FAA ~~million.~~had ~~HBAC~~referred ~~filed its Statement of Defense and Counterclaim on April 5, 2010 denying liability and asserting~~ a ~~counterclaim~~civil ~~against~~penalty ~~Airbus~~matter inarising ~~the~~out ~~amount~~ of ~~£6,433,015.~~its ~~The arbitration~~investigation ~~merits~~to ~~hearing~~the ~~was held July 27-30, 2010~~U.S. ~~Post-hearing~~Attorney’s ~~submissions~~Office ~~were~~for ~~completed~~enforcement inand that ~~October 2010. On April 29, 2011,~~ the ~~International~~FAA ~~Chamber~~had ofrecommended ~~Commerce~~imposing ~~issued~~civil ~~its~~penalties ~~final~~against ~~award~~HBAC. inHBAC ~~favor~~reached ofa ~~Airbus~~settlement inwith the ~~amount~~FAA ~~of £6,649,975 plus interest and arbitrator costs,~~ with ~~each~~respect ~~party~~ to ~~bear~~this ~~its~~matter ~~own~~in ~~legal fees and costs. We paid~~ the ~~final~~first ~~award~~quarter toof ~~Airbus in May~~ 2011. ~~The~~It ~~effect~~does ofnot ~~this~~have ~~final~~a ~~award~~material ~~was~~impact ~~reflected~~on inour ~~the unaudited condensed consolidated~~ financial ~~statements~~ ofcondition, ~~our~~results ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as~~ of ~~and~~operations or ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2011~~liquidity. The settlement ~~to Airbus~~ was ~~less~~neither ~~than~~an ~~the~~admission ~~amount previously accrued. This provided a positive impact~~ of ~~approximately~~liability ~~$6.0~~or ~~million~~wrongdoing onby ~~our operating~~HBAC, ~~loss within the Business~~ and ~~General~~there ~~Aviation segment that~~ was ~~partially~~no ~~offset~~finding byof aany ~~$2.5~~regulatory ~~million~~or ~~increase~~other ~~in interest expense~~violation.

On April 7, 2009, Airbus UK Ltd. (“Airbus”) filed a Request for Arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris initiating proceedings against HBAC. Airbus alleged that HBAC breached its obligations under the Airframe Purchase and Support Agreement dated August 19, 1998 between Airbus and HBAC. More particularly, Airbus claimed that it and HBAC reached agreement in April of 2008 for HBAC to purchase increased volumes of fuselages, wings, track kits and spare parts (collectively the “Shipsets”) in the 2008 to 2010 time frame. Airbus further alleged that (i) beginning in late 2008, HBAC unilaterally reduced the number of Shipsets that it would purchase in breach of its contractual obligations and (ii) that Airbus made substantial investments to expand its production capacity at the urging of HBAC and in reliance on alleged expanded commitments from HBAC. On December 23, 2009, Airbus filed its Statement of Claim, which sought an award of damages potentially in excess of £40 million. HBAC filed its Statement of Defense and Counterclaim on April 5, 2010 denying liability and asserting a counterclaim against Airbus in the amount of £6,433,015. The arbitration merits hearing was held July 27-30, 2010. Post-hearing submissions were completed in October 2010. On April 29, 2011, the International Chamber of Commerce issued its final award in favor of Airbus in the amount of £6,649,975 plus interest and arbitrator costs, with each party to bear its own legal fees and costs. We paid the final award to Airbus in May 2011. The effect of this final award was reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The settlement to Airbus was less than the amount previously accrued. This provided a positive impact of approximately $6.0 million on our operating loss within the Business and General Aviation segment that was partially offset by a $2.5 million increase in interest expense.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, ~~financial position or results of operations. There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~

financial position or results of operations. There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.

Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description
ExhibitNumber		Description
4.1*		Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2007 by and between Hawker Beechcraft, Inc., Onex, GSCP and Management Shareholders.
31.1.1*		Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC.
31.1.2*		Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company.
31.1.3*		Certifications of the Principal Financial Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC.
31.1.4*		Certifications of the Principal Financial Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company.
32.1.1*		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC.
32.1.2*		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company.
32.1.3*		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC.
32.1.4*		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company.
101.INS(1)		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*	Filed herewith.

⁽¹⁾

XBRL information is furnished and not filed as a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections.

3536

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HAWKER BEECHCRAFT ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC By: Hawker Beechcraft, Inc., its Sole Member By: /s/ T.Karin-Joyce ~~Patrick~~Tjon ~~Kelly~~Sien T.Fat ~~Patrick~~Karin-Joyce ~~Kelly~~Tjon Sien Fat Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) By: /s/ Gina E. Vascsinec Gina E. Vascsinec, Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~August~~November 92, 2011

3637

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HAWKER BEECHCRAFT NOTES COMPANY By: /s/ T.Karin-Joyce ~~Patrick~~Tjon ~~Kelly~~Sien T.Fat ~~Patrick~~Karin-Joyce ~~Kelly~~Tjon Sien Fat Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) By: /s/ Gina E. Vascsinec Gina E. Vascsinec, Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~August~~November 92, 2011

3738

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · HAWKER BEECHCRAFT ACQUISITION CO LLC