UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to to

Commission file number 1-12692

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		13-3490149
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification no.)

325 North LaSalle Street, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois		60654
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

312-923-0030

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ or No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ or No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non- accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ or No þ.

As of ~~July~~October 2827, 2011, the registrant had 16,901,~~860~~867 shares of its Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

	Page
Forward-Looking Statements		3
Part I - Financial Information
Part I—Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements		4
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011 - unaudited		4
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2011 and January 2, 2011—unaudited		4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six month periods ended July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010 – unaudited		6
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011 and October 3, 2010—unaudited		6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010 – unaudited		7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine month periods ended October 2, 2011 and October 3, 2010—unaudited		7
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		8
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		22
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		22
Part II - Other Information
Part II—Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		23
Item 1A. Risk Factors		23
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		23
Item 5. Other Information		23
Item 6. Exhibits		24
Signatures		25

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements, written, oral or otherwise made, represent the Company’s expectation or belief concerning future events. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “thinks,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

The Company cautions that these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

(i) a reduction in consumer and/or business spending in one or more of the Company’s markets due to business layoffs, or budget reductions, negative consumer sentiment, ~~access to consumer credit, commodity and other prices,~~ events or occurrences affecting the securities and/or financial markets, ~~occurrences affecting the Company’s common stock, housing values,~~ changes in federal, state, foreign and/or local tax levels or other factors;

(ii) risks relating to the restaurant industry and the Company’s business, including competition, changes in consumer tastes and preferences, risks associated with opening new locations, increases in ~~food and other raw materials~~ costs, ~~increases in energy costs,~~ demographic trends, traffic patterns, weather conditions, employee availability, ~~benefits and cost increases,~~ perceived product safety issues, supply interruptions, litigation judgments or settlements in pending litigation, government regulation, the Company’s ability to maintain adequate financing facilities, the Company’s liquidity and capital resources, prevailing interest rates and legal and regulatory matters;

(iii) ~~public~~risks ~~health~~regarding ~~issues,~~the ~~including~~timing or whether the Company will elect to pursue any of the strategic alternatives it may consider, ~~without~~or ~~limitation~~that ~~risks~~any ~~relating~~such alternatives will result in changes to the ~~spread~~Company’s business plan or a sale of ~~pandemic~~the ~~diseases~~Company; and

(iv) other risks ~~regarding~~detailed ~~the~~in ~~timing~~“Item or1A. ~~whether~~Risk ~~the~~Factors” ~~Company~~herein, ~~will~~in ~~elect to pursue any of~~ the ~~strategic~~Company’s ~~alternatives~~most itrecent ~~may~~Form ~~consider,~~10-K orand ~~that any such alternatives will result~~ in ~~changes to~~ the Company’s ~~business~~other ~~plan~~reports orfiled afrom ~~sale~~time ofto time with the ~~Company;~~Securities and Exchange Commission.

~~(v)~~In ~~other~~addition, ~~risks~~the ~~detailed~~Company’s inability ~~“Item~~to ~~1A.~~open ~~Risk~~new restaurants ~~Factors”~~is ~~herein~~dependent upon various factors, insuch as the availability of attractive sites for new restaurants, the ability to negotiate suitable lease terms, the ability to generate or borrow funds to develop new restaurants, the ability to obtain various government permits and licenses, limitations on permitted capital expenditures under the Company’s ~~most~~Senior ~~recent~~Credit ~~Form~~Facility ~~10-K~~(as ~~and~~defined in Note 8 “Long Term Debt” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report) and the recruitment and training of skilled management and restaurant employees. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm the Company’s ~~other~~business, ~~reports~~financial ~~filed~~condition ~~from~~and ~~time~~results. Consequently, there can be no assurance that actual results or developments anticipated by the Company will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, ~~time~~or ~~with~~effects on, the ~~Securities~~Company. ~~and~~The ~~Exchange~~Company ~~Commission~~undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable securities laws.

In addition, the Company’s ability to open new restaurants is dependent upon various factors, such as the availability of attractive sites for new restaurants, the ability to negotiate suitable lease terms, the ability to generate or borrow funds to develop new restaurants, the ability to obtain various government permits and licenses, limitations on permitted capital expenditures under the Company’s Senior Credit Facility (as defined in Note 8 “Long Term Debt” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report) and the recruitment and training of skilled management and restaurant employees. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm the Company’s business, financial condition and results. Consequently, there can be no assurance that actual results or developments anticipated by the Company will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, the Company. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable securities laws.

Part I-—Financial Information

Item 1.

Financial Statements

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(amounts in thousands)

	July 3,2011		January 2,2011
	October 2,2011		January 2,2011
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,~~151~~073	$	1,214
Restricted cash		12,~~532~~215		1,435
Accounts receivable		45,~~456~~430		6,407
Inventories		10,~~197~~046		10,819
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,~~307~~916		4,180
Income taxes receivable		4464		96
Total current assets		2022,~~687~~744		24,151
Property and equipment, at cost:
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		31,~~203~~729		29,635
Buildings and leasehold improvements		103,~~491~~961		99,330
Land		7,300		7,300
Construction in progress		~~198~~332		1,320
		142,192		137,585
		143,322		137,585
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		5153,~~562~~790		46,091
Property and equipment, net		9089,~~630~~532		91,494
Intangible asset		73,000		73,000
Goodwill		6,~~990~~903		6,938
Other assets and deferred expenses, net		65,~~096~~998		6,231
	$	~~197~~198,~~403~~177	$	201,814

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets, Continued

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	July 3,2011			January 2,2011
	October 2,2011			January 2,2011
	(unaudited)
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	911,~~692~~586		$	11,703
Accrued expenses		1821,~~516~~222			20,959
Deferred revenue from gift certificates and gift cards		1211,~~030~~032			15,542
Current portion of long-term debt		3,~~880~~884			3,871
Accrued income taxes		~~425~~433			936
Total current liabilities		4448,~~543~~157			53,011
Long-term debt, net of current portion		6465,~~959~~355			63,631
Deferred income taxes, net		25,~~957~~402			25,857
Deferred rent and landlord allowances		42,~~455~~267			42,520
Other liabilities		2,~~888~~536			3,671
Total liabilities		~~180~~183,~~802~~717			188,690
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. 30,000,000 shares authorized, 1,200,000 issued and outstanding at July 3, 2011 and at January 2, 2011		12			12
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. 30,000,000 shares authorized, 1,200,000 issued and outstanding at October 2, 2011 and at January 2, 2011		12			12
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share. 100,000,000 shares authorized, 17,413,739 and 17,267,571 issued and 16,181,739 and 16,035,571 outstanding at July 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011, respectively		175			173
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share. 100,000,000 shares authorized, 18,133,669 and 17,267,571 issued and 16,901,669 and 16,035,571 outstanding at October 2, 2011 and January 2, 2011, respectively		181			173
Additional paid-in capital		175,~~183~~541			174,828
Treasury stock, 1,232,000 shares at a weighted average cost of $7.63 per share at July 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011		(9,395	)		(9,395	)
Treasury stock, 1,232,000 shares at a weighted average cost of $7.63 per share at October 2, 2011 and January 2, 2011		(9,395	)		(9,395	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		~~1,164~~890			961
Accumulated deficit		(~~149~~152,~~980~~272	)		(152,790	)
Total stockholders’ equity of controlling interest		1714,~~159~~957			13,789
Noncontrolling interest		(~~558~~497	)		(665	)
Total equity		1614,~~601~~460			13,124
	$	~~197~~198,~~403~~177		$	201,814

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Three month periods ended						~~Six~~Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011			July 4,2010			July 3,2011		July 4,2010
	October 2,2011			October 3,2010			October 2,2011		October 3,2010
	(unaudited)
Revenues	$	7771,~~963~~442		$	7066,~~457~~247		$	~~160~~231,~~486~~928	$	~~145~~212,~~779~~026
Food and beverage costs		2322,~~958~~570			2120,~~481~~445			4972,~~575~~145		4464,~~142~~587
Restaurant operating expenses		4241,~~389~~195			3938,~~326~~888			85126,~~251~~446		80119,~~559~~447
Pre-opening costs		8262			~~325~~789			~~354~~416		~~429~~1,218
Depreciation and amortization		2,~~734~~751			2,~~543~~454			58,~~395~~146		57,~~042~~496
General and administrative expenses		4,~~767~~425			34,~~838~~250			914,~~778~~053		812,~~088~~338
Marketing and promotional expenses		1,~~703~~515			1,~~889~~276			34,~~229~~744		34,~~285~~561
Charge related to legal settlements		—235			—			~~481~~866		540
Operating income		2,330			1,055			6,423		3,694
Operating (loss) income		(1,311	)		(1,855	)		5,112		1,839
Interest expense, net		1,~~344~~369			~~923~~956			24,~~686~~055		12,~~875~~831
Income before income taxes from continuing operations		986			132			3,737		1,819
(Loss) income before income taxes from continuing operations		(2,680	)		(2,811	)		1,057		(992	)
Income tax expense		248			6			824		438
Income tax (benefit) expense		(348	)		(395	)		476		43
Income from continuing operations		738			126			2,913		1,381
(Loss) income from continuing operations		(2,332	)		(2,416	)		581		(1,035	)
Discontinued operations		—99			(~~789~~66	)		—99		(~~803~~869	)
Net income (loss)		738			(663	)		2,913		578
Net (loss) income		(2,233	)		(2,482	)		680		(1,904	)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		8459			(~~147~~293	)		~~103~~162		(~~113~~406	)
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest	$	654		$	(516	)	$	2,810	$	691
Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest	$	(2,292	)	$	(2,189	)	$	518	$	(1,498	)
Amounts attributable to controlling interest:
Income from continuing operations	$	654		$	273		$	2,810	$	1,494
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(2,391	)	$	(2,123	)	$	419	$	(629	)
Discontinued operations		—99			(~~789~~66	)		—99		(~~803~~869	)
Net income (loss)	$	654		$	(516	)	$	2,810	$	691
Net (loss) income	$	(2,292	)	$	(2,189	)	$	518	$	(1,498	)
Basic income (loss) per share:
Basic (loss) income per share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.0415	)	$	(0.0213	)	$	0.1702	$	(0.0904	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.0001		$	(0.0501	)	$	0.0001	$	(0.05	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.04		$	(0.03	)	$	0.17	$	0.04
Net (loss) income per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.14	)	$	0.03	$	(0.09	)
Diluted income (loss) per share:
Diluted (loss) income per share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.0415	)	$	(0.0213	)	$	0.1602	$	(0.0904	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.0001		$	(0.0501	)	$	0.0001	$	(0.05	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.04		$	(0.03	)	$	0.16	$	0.04
Net (loss) income per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.14	)	$	0.03	$	(0.09	)
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Shares used in computing net (loss) income per share:
Basic		16,~~181~~182,~~045~~386			16,~~032~~033,~~419~~111			16,~~154~~164,~~850~~029		16,~~010~~017,~~087~~762
Diluted		1716,~~618~~182,~~481~~386			1716,~~471~~033,~~550~~111			17,~~673~~557,~~759~~961		1716,~~153~~017,~~196~~762

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands)

	Six month periods ended
	Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011			July 4,2010
	October 2,2011			October 3,2010
	(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	2,913		$	578
Net income (loss)	$	680		$	(1,904	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges		69,~~027~~103			610,~~633~~493
Non-cash portion of charge related to legal settlements		—			540
Deferred income taxes		~~416~~(494	)		(~~251~~957	)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		~~1,964~~952			~~2,266~~511
Inventories		~~651~~745			~~390~~501
Prepaid expenses and other assets		~~849~~202			~~(1,471~~42	)
Income taxes receivable		5232			~~488~~489
Accounts payable		(~~2,045~~117	)		(~~449~~922	)
Accrued expenses and deferred revenue		(53,~~201~~756	)		(89,~~646~~882	)
Other liabilities		(~~642~~996	)		~~1,879~~517
Accrued income taxes		(~~730~~569	)		(~~200~~94	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,254			1,757
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		5,782			(666	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(56,~~443~~842	)		(56,~~023~~292	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(56,~~443~~842	)		(56,~~023~~292	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under senior credit facility		712,100			613,~~300~~400
Payments made on senior credit facility		(59,~~862~~893	)		(59,~~000~~600	)
Principal reduction on obligation to financial institution		(86132	)		(80120	)
Borrowings under non-recourse loan		—			89
Shares vested and surrendered by employees in lieu of paying minimum income taxes		(~~354~~244	)		(~~159~~221	)
Increase in restricted cash		(77774	)		(21,~~498~~240	)
(Payments) proceeds from joint venture loan payable		(8480	)		4,~~097~~273
JV partners’ investment in joint venture		—			~~171~~78
Payments of deferred financing costs		(6	)		(11	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		~~631~~971			26,~~909~~648
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		~~495~~(52	)		~~(25~~96	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(63141	)		(~~382~~214	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,214			1,141
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,~~151~~073		$	~~759~~927

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“MRG,” the “Company,” the “controlling interest,” “we,” “us” and “our”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions relating to assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company uses a 52/53 week fiscal year which ends on the Sunday closest to January 1. Approximately every six or seven years, a 53rd week is added. Fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 are each 52 week years.

MRG was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on October 3, 1988. In February 2006, the Company and certain selling stockholders completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of shares of common stock. The first Morton’s was opened in 1978 in downtown Chicago, where Morton’s corporate office is still located. Since then, Morton’s has grown to 77 restaurants (“Morton’s”) and one Trevi restaurant (“Trevi”) as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011.

Statements of Cash Flows

For the purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. In addition, accrued purchases of property and equipment are reflected as non-cash transactions in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Furthermore, the issuance of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) in connection with the settlement of certain wage and hour litigation during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010, is reflected as a non-cash transaction in ~~the~~ the consolidated statements of cash flows.

The following table sets forth the amount of interest paid, including capitalized interest, and net income taxes paid for each period presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows (amounts in thousands):

	Six month periods ended
	Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011		July 4,2010
	October 2,2011		October 3,2010
Interest paid	$	2,~~548~~697	$	12,~~448~~152
Capitalized interest		20		7
Income taxes paid, net of refunds		1,~~088~~512		~~407~~608

Income Taxes

The Company recognized income tax expense of $0.85 million on pre-tax income related to continuing operations of $31.71 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011. The Company’s effective tax rate was 2245.10% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and was primarily attributable to non-U.S. and current state income taxes, asan adjustment ~~well~~related asto ~~current~~filing ~~state~~our ~~income taxes~~tax returns for fiscal 2010 and a charge related to the non-cash effect of a local tax law change on our deferred tax liability. Based on management’s evaluation of certain factors, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company established a valuation allowance for all U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. Management continues to believe that a valuation allowance for all U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets is necessary based on the cumulative loss incurred in the past three years. Consideration is given to all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. Due to the historical losses recorded in our U.S. operations and the uncertainty of the economic outlook, we continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets.

4) Net ~~Income~~ (~~loss~~Loss) Income per Share

The Company computes net ~~income~~ (loss) income per common share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share.” Basic net ~~income~~ (loss) income per share has been computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net ~~income~~ (loss) income per share is calculated in the same manner, but adjusts shares outstanding to reflect the potential dilution that would occur if unvested restricted stock awards were vested and if the preferred shares outstanding had been converted to common shares. In periods where losses are recorded, inclusion of potentially dilutive securities in the calculation would decrease the loss per common share and, therefore, these securities are not added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding due to their anti-dilutive effect.

The following table sets forth the approximate number of shares that were not included in the calculation of diluted net ~~income~~ (loss) income per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive, if any, and the computation of basic and diluted net ~~income~~ (loss) income per share attributable to controlling interest for the periods presented (amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

	Three month periods ended						~~Six~~Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011			July 4,2010			July 3,2011		July 4,2010
	October 2,2011			October 3,2010			October 2,2011		October 3,2010
Potentially dilutive shares that are considered anti-dilutive:
Restricted stock		~~104~~729,000			~~240~~697,000			~~122~~736,000		~~282~~732,000
Income from continuing operations	$	654		$	273		$	2,810	$	1,494
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(2,391	)	$	(2,123	)	$	419	$	(629	)
Discontinued operations		—99			(~~789~~66	)		—99		(~~803~~869	)
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest	$	654		$	(516	)	$	2,810	$	691
Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest	$	(2,292	)	$	(2,189	)	$	518	$	(1,498	)
Shares:
Weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding		16,~~181~~182,~~045~~386			16,~~032~~033,~~419~~111			16,~~154~~164,~~850~~029		16,~~010~~017,~~087~~762
Dilutive potential common shares		~~1,437,436~~—			~~1,439,131~~—			1,~~518~~393,~~909~~932		~~1,143,109~~—
Weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding		1716,~~618~~182,~~481~~386			1716,~~471~~033,~~550~~111			17,~~673~~557,~~759~~961		1716,~~153~~017,~~196~~762
Basic income (loss) per share:
Basic (loss) income per share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.0415	)	$	(0.0213	)	$	0.1702	$	(0.0904	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.0001		$	(0.0501	)	$	0.0001	$	(0.05	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.04		$	(0.03	)	$	0.17	$	0.04
Net (loss) income per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.14	)	$	0.03	$	(0.09	)
Diluted income (loss) per share:
Diluted (loss) income per share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.0415	)	$	(0.0213	)	$	0.1602	$	(0.0904	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.0001		$	(0.0501	)	$	0.0001	$	(0.05	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.04		$	(0.03	)	$	0.16	$	0.04
Net (loss) income per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.14	)	$	0.03	$	(0.09	)

5) Comprehensive ~~Income~~ (Loss) Income

The components of comprehensive ~~income~~ (loss) ~~for~~income ~~the~~were ~~three~~as ~~and~~follows ~~six~~for ~~month~~the periods ~~ended~~presented ~~July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010 are as follows~~ (amounts in thousands):

	Three month periods ended						~~Six~~Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011			July 4,2010			July 3,2011			July 4,2010
	October 2,2011			October 3,2010			October 2,2011			October 3,2010
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest	$	654		$	(516	)	$	2,810		$	691
Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest	$	(2,292	)	$	(2,189	)	$	518		$	(1,498	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation		44(274	)		~~(28~~24	)		~~203~~(71	)		(284	)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interest		698			(544	)		3,013			663
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to controlling interest		(2,566	)		(2,165	)		447			(1,502	)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		8459			(~~147~~293	)		~~103~~162			(~~113~~406	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	782		$	(691	)	$	3,116		$	550
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(2,507	)	$	(2,458	)	$	609		$	(1,908	)

Stock Based Compensation

Prior to the IPO, the Company adopted the 2006 MRG Stock Incentive Plan (the “equity incentive plan”). The equity incentive plan provides for the grant of stock options and stock appreciation rights and for awards of shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units and other equity-based awards to employees, officers, directors or consultants. As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock approved for grant under the equity incentive plan was 1,789,000 shares. If an award granted under the equity incentive plan terminates, lapses or is forfeited before the vesting of the related shares, those shares will again be available to be granted. During the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, the Company granted and issued the following ~~shares of~~ restricted stock awards to certain of its employees and directors pursuant to the equity incentive plan:

Date of Grant	Number ofShares Granted		Stock Price onGrant Date
January 25, 2011		264,850	$	6.62
May 19, 2011		1,500	$	7.45
July 26, 2011		2,700	$	7.60

Activity relating to the shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to the equity incentive plan during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 was as follows:

	Number ofShares
Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of January 2, 2011		673,200
Granted at a weighted average price of $6.62 per share		266,350
Granted at a weighted average price of $6.63 per share		269,050
Vested with 50,212 shares surrendered in lieu of paying taxes (a)		(196,380	)
Vested with 50,612 shares surrendered in lieu of paying taxes(a)		(197,660	)
Forfeited by termination		(1525,~~240~~540	)
Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of July 3, 2011		727,930
Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of October 2, 2011		719,050

(a) In connection with the vesting of shares, certain employees elected to pay the employee minimum income taxes due by surrendering shares in lieu of paying the taxes in cash. Such surrendered shares were cancelled by the Company.

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, there were ~~395~~402,~~190~~790 shares available for grant pursuant to the equity incentive plan.

In accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite ~~employee~~ service period (generally the vesting period of the grant). The Company recognized stock-based compensation for awards issued under the equity incentive plan in the following line items for the periods presented in the consolidated statements of operations (amounts in thousands):

	Three month periods ended				~~Six~~Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011		July 4,2010		July 3,2011		July 4,2010
	October 2,2011		October 3,2010		October 2,2011		October 3,2010
Restaurant operating expenses	$	81	$	9891	$	~~191~~271	$	~~188~~279
General and administrative expenses		~~272~~273		~~415~~397		~~457~~731		~~799~~1,196
Marketing and promotional expenses		17		1617		4158		3350
Net compensation expense		370		529		689		1,020
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	371	$	505	$	1,060	$	1,525

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, total remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock-based payment awards, net of estimated forfeitures, was approximately $3.2.9 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.43 years.

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, the Company owned and operated 77 Morton’s steakhouses, including 71 domestic ~~restaurants~~ restaurants located in 64 cities across 26 states and San Juan, Puerto Rico, and 6 international locations (Toronto, Canada; Hong Kong, China; Macau, China; Shanghai, China; Mexico City, Mexico and Singapore), as well as Trevi, our Italian restaurant, which is located next to the ‘Fountain of the Gods’ at The Forum Shops at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, NV.

~~Income~~(Loss) income before income taxes from continuing operations for the Company’s domestic and foreign operations ~~are~~were as follows for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):

	Three month periods ended						~~Six~~Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011			July 4,2010			July 3,2011			July 4,2010
	October 2,2011			October 3,2010			October 2,2011			October 3,2010
Domestic (72 restaurants at July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010)	$	(510	)	$	(412	)	$	881		$	362
Domestic (72 restaurants at October 2, 2011 and October 3, 2010)	$	(3,743	)	$	(3,057	)	$	(2,862	)	$	(2,696	)
Foreign (6 and 5 restaurants at July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010, respectively)		1,496			544			2,856			1,457
Foreign (6 and 5 restaurants at October 2, 2011 and October 3, 2010, respectively)		1,063			246			3,919			1,704
Total	$	~~986~~(2,680	)	$	~~132~~(2,811	)	$	31,~~737~~057		$	~~1,819~~(992	)

Domestic (loss) income before income taxes from continuing operations includes certain corporate expenses ~~and~~ and other charges that relate to our U.S. based headquarters, and are included in domestic operations but not allocated to the foreign operations. A $0.25 million charge relating to the settlement of certain wage and hour claims as well as expenses for professional fees associated with the previously announced exploration of strategic alternatives is included in the domestic (loss) income before income taxes from continuing operations for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011. A $01.96 million charge relating to the settlement of certain wage and hour and similar labor claims as well as ~~relating~~expenses tofor professional fees associated with the previously announced exploration of strategic alternatives is included in the domestic (loss) income before income taxes from continuing operations for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~ October 32, 2011. The charge related to the legal settlements of approximately $0.5 million is included in the domestic (loss) income before income taxes from continuing operations for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010.

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt asconsisted of ~~July 3,~~the ~~2011~~following ~~and~~obligations ~~January 2,~~for ~~2011 consisted of~~ the ~~following~~periods presented (amounts in thousands):

	July 3,2011		January 2,2011
	October 2,2011		January 2,2011
Senior credit facility (a)	$	5657,~~838~~807	$	55,600
Mortgage loan (b)		2,~~806~~761		2,893
Joint venture loans payable (c)		7,~~557~~033		7,371
Non-recourse loan (d)		1,638		1,638
Total long-term debt		6869,~~839~~239		67,502
Less: Current portion		3,~~880~~884		3,871
Long-term debt, net of current portion	$	6465,~~959~~355	$	63,631

(a) Senior Credit Facility

Goldman Sachs Bank

On December 9, 2010, the Company entered into a new five-year $70.0 million senior credit facility with Goldman Sachs Bank USA ~~(“Goldman Sachs”)~~ which includes a $60.0 million principal amount senior term loan and $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of revolving commitments (“Senior Credit Facility”). The Senior Credit Facility matures on December 8, 2015. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Morton’s of Chicago, Inc. (“Morton’s of Chicago”), is the borrower under the facility and most of its domestic subsidiaries are guarantors. As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, the Company had outstanding borrowings of approximately $54.7 3 million under the senior term loan and $23.15 million under the revolver, and was in compliance with all of its financial covenants. Management believes that the carrying value of the outstanding borrowings ~~approximate~~approximates fair value since interest rates vary with market conditions.

Subject to customary conditions, including the absence of default under the Senior Credit Facility, all of the $10.0 million available under the revolving commitments may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed, as applicable, until the maturity date thereof. The Company is required to make scheduled installment payments on the senior term loan periodically and any additional voluntary payments reduce these scheduled installment payments on a pro-rata basis. The scheduled payments of $3.7 million, which are due within 12 months of the most recent balance sheet date, are included in “Current portion of long-term debt” on the consolidated balance sheet. In addition, we are also subject to certain mandatory prepayments determined by certain conditions of the ~~Senior~~ Credit ~~Facility~~Agreement.

Loans made under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at a rate per annum equal to either a “Base Rate” or an “Adjusted LIBOR Rate,” in each case plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is 5.50% for Adjusted LIBOR Rate loans and 4.50% for Base Rate loans until delivery of our financial statements for the fiscal year ending January 1, 2012, and after that the applicable margin for Adjusted LIBOR Rate loans ranges from 4.50% to 5.50% and the applicable margin for the Base Rate loans ranges from 3.50% to 4.50%, in each case, based on our senior leverage ratio. The Adjusted LIBOR Rate is subject to a floor of 1.75% and the Base Rate is subject to a floor of 4.75%. The “Base Rate” is a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) the rate of interest quoted in The Wall Street Journal, Money Rates Section as the Prime Rate as in effect from time-to-time and (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum.

The Senior Credit Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants customary for similar credit facilities. The affirmative covenants include, but are not limited to: delivery of financial statements, maintenance of existence, payment of taxes, maintenance of properties and insurance, and compliance with laws. The negative covenants include, but are not limited to: limitations on indebtedness, liens, negative pledges, restricted payments, investments, disposition of assets, acquisitions, sales and lease-backs and transactions with affiliates. Notwithstanding the limitation on restricted payments, the Company will be permitted to redeem or repurchase its preferred securities.

With respect to the Senior Credit Facility, we are required to comply with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.15:1.00 and a maximum senior leverage ratio that ranges from 1.75:1.00 to 2.75:1.00 based on the fiscal year, among various other covenants.

The Senior Credit Facility contains events of default (subject to exceptions, thresholds and grace periods), including, without limitation, for: (i) nonpayment of principal or interest; (ii) failure to perform or comply with covenants; (iii) breaches of representations and warranties; (iv) cross-defaults with certain other indebtedness; (v) certain bankruptcy related events (subject to limited exceptions for certain inactive subsidiaries or operating subsidiaries which cease operations); (vi) impairment of security interests in collateral; (vii) invalidity of guarantees; (viii) monetary judgment defaults; and (ix) certain ERISA matters. Other than in respect of a bankruptcy related event of default, which would result in the automatic and immediate requirement to repay all borrowings and other amounts due, if an event of default occurs the lenders would be entitled to require the immediate repayment of all borrowings and other amounts due under the facility and to seize and sell the collateral pledged to secure the borrowings and other obligations under the facility.

(b) Mortgage loan

During fiscal 2001, one of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a mortgage loan with GE Capital Franchise Finance aggregating $4.0 million with an interest rate of 8.98% per annum, the proceeds of which were used to fund the purchase of land and construction of a restaurant. OnThe ~~both July 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011, the aggregate~~ outstanding principal balance due on this mortgage loan was ~~approximately~~ $2.8 million, and $2.9 million as of October 2, 2011 and January 2, 2011, ~~which~~respectively. Of the outstanding principal balance due, approximately $0.2 million of principal is included in “Current portion of long-term debt” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of October 2, 2011 and January 2, 2011. The mortgage loan is scheduled to mature in March 2021. As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants of this mortgage loan.

Also included in the consolidated balance sheets ~~as of July 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011,~~ are liabilities related to variable interest entities (See Note 9) consisting of loans for the Company’s Mexico City and Shanghai restaurants totaling $7.60 million as of October 2, 2011 and $7.4 million as of January 2, ~~respectively~~2011. The proceeds of the loans were used to fund construction of the respective restaurants, pre-opening costs and initial operating expenses. These loans are treated as debt of the joint ventures. The loan related to Mexico City is repayable without interest while the loan related to Shanghai requires simple interest to be accrued at an annual interest rate of 2%.

(d) Non-recourse loan

On April 13, 2009, one of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into an agreement with Crown at Miami Beach, LTD, pursuant to which that subsidiary borrowed $1.6 million, which is still outstanding as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011. Loan proceeds were used solely for costs incurred in connection with the construction and opening of the restaurant located in Miami Beach, FLFlorida, including for the acquisition and installation of furniture, fixtures and equipment. The loan bears interest at 8.0% and matures on October 1, 2014 at which time a balloon payment of the total principal outstanding is due.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (Joint Ventures)

The Company operates Morton’s ~~steakhouses~~Steakhouses in Mexico City, Mexico and in Shanghai, China in which the Company has variable interests. The accounts of these variable interest entities (“VIEs”) have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements due to the fact that the Company is the primary beneficiary inof the VIEs. The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the VIEs do not represent an additional claim on the Company’s general assets but rather each loan represents a claim against the specific assets of each consolidated VIE. Conversely, assets recognized as a result of consolidating the VIEs do not represent additional assets that could be used to satisfy claims against the Company’s general assets.

The Company determined it is the primary beneficiary of the two VIEs as the Company is responsible for the day-to-day management and operation of the restaurants, including new menu selection and pricing. These activities were determined to most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. Upon repayment of the outstanding loans, profits from the VIEs will be distributed to the owners in proportion to their ownership interests. The Company is not involved in any VIEs other than those discussed above. The amounts set forth in the table below were included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets related to the VIEs for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):

	July 3,2011		January 2,2011
	October 2,2011		January 2,2011
Restricted cash	$	~~615~~965	$	805
Total assets		6,~~839~~599		6,942
Joint venture loans payable		7,~~557~~033		7,371

10)

Restaurant Activity

During the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, the Company opened a new Morton’s ~~steakhouse~~Steakhouse in the ~~Uptown~~ Uptown area of Dallas, TX, which also includes a Bar 12—•21 and ~~have~~ entered into a lease to open a new Morton’s steakhouse in the ~~Tyson’s~~Tysons Corner area of Vienna, VAVirginia.

11)

Discontinued Operations

The Company accounts for closed restaurants as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment,” due to the fact that the Company does not expect any further direct or indirect cash flows from these restaurants. Accordingly, the results of closed restaurants are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of discontinued operations were as follows for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):

	Three month periods ended					~~Six~~Nine month periods ended
	July 3,2011		July 4,2010			July 3,2011		July 4,2010
	October 2,2011		October 3,2010			October 2,2011		October 3,2010
Revenues	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Loss before income taxes		—		(789	)		—		(803	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		99		(66	)		99		(869	)
Income tax benefit		—		—			—		—
Net loss	$	—	$	(789	)	$	—	$	(803	)
Net income (loss)	$	99	$	(66	)	$	99	$	(869	)

12)

Legal Matters and Contingencies

The Company records legal fees and accruals in accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies.” A liability is recorded when it is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s accounting policy is to accrue estimated legal defense costs under ASC Topic 450.

In ~~February~~August 2010, ~~two~~a former ~~employees~~employee of the ~~San~~Costa ~~Diego~~Mesa Morton’s steakhouse filed a state-wide class action complaint against Morton’s of Chicago~~/San~~ ~~Diego, Inc.~~ in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of ~~San~~Los ~~Diego~~Angeles, alleging certain violations of the California Labor Code and the California Unfair Competition Law ~~for~~ for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, failure to pay overtime and failure to provide employees with accurate wage statements as a result of the classification of California-based Assistant Managers and Day Managers as salaried exempt. The plaintiff ~~plaintiffs~~is ~~were~~ seeking recovery of statutory penalties, unpaid wages and overtime, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief and attorneys’ fees and costs. OnThe ~~January 7,~~Company ~~2011~~is contesting this matter vigorously. In September 2010, the Company’s removed ~~partial~~the ~~motion~~case ~~for~~to ~~summary~~Federal ~~judgment~~court ~~was granted~~ and the ~~plaintiffs’~~plaintiff ~~claims~~subsequently ~~for~~filed ~~failure~~a motion to ~~provide~~remand. ~~rest~~On ~~periods~~January 26, ~~and~~2011, ~~failure~~the toplaintiff’s ~~provide~~motion ~~employees with~~to ~~accurate~~remand ~~wage~~was ~~statements were dismissed~~denied. In addition, on ~~February~~June 1813, 2011, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. InA ~~May~~jury ~~2011,~~trial ais ~~settlement~~scheduled ~~and~~for ~~release~~January ~~agreement~~2012. ~~was~~In ~~entered~~October ~~into~~2011, byan ~~the~~agreement ~~parties~~was ~~resolving~~reached to resolve this matter.

In August 2010, a former employee of the Costa Mesa Morton’s steakhouse filed a state-wide class action complaint against Morton’s of Chicago in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, alleging certain violations of the California Labor Code and the California Unfair Competition Law for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, failure to pay overtime and failure to provide employees with accurate wage statements as a result of the classification of California-based Assistant Managers and Day Managers as salaried exempt. The plaintiff is seeking recovery of statutory penalties, unpaid wages and overtime, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief and attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company is contesting this matter vigorously. In September 2010, the Company removed the case to Federal court and the plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to remand. On January 26, 2011, the plaintiff’s motion to remand was denied. In addition, on June 13, 2011, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. A jury trial is scheduled for January 2012. The plaintiff in this matter has not stated the amount of damages sought and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the plaintiff.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions, including claims and legal actions by landlords, arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

13)

Subsequent Events

We evaluated all of our activity through the issue date of these financial statements and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred, other than the legal matter discussed in Note 12, that would require recognition in the financial statements or disclosure in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011.

Overview

Many parts of the world including the United States have been in, or are recovering from, a recession and despite the recent increases in comparable sales we have experienced, we believe that weak general economic conditions could continue through the rest of 2011 and possibly beyond. The ongoing impact of the housing crisis and high unemployment may further exacerbate current economic conditions. We continue to experience many of the same challenges our partners and competitors in the industry are facing. As a result of these economic conditions, our guests may become more apprehensive about the economy and/or related factors, and may reduce their level of discretionary spending. A decrease in spending due to lower consumer discretionary income or consumer confidence caused by uncertainty in the current state of the global economy could impact the frequency with which our guests choose to dine out or the amount they spend on meals while dining out, thereby decreasing our revenues and negatively affecting our operating results.

Results of Operations

Three Month Period Ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 (13 weeks) compared to Three Month Period Ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010 (13 weeks)

Our ~~income~~ loss from continuing operations attributable to controlling interest for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 was $0(2.74) million, compared to a loss of $0(2.31) million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. The change is primarily due to improved operating results from an increase in comparable restaurant revenues, net of related food and beverage and restaurant operating costs, which was offset by higher interest. For purposes of this discussion, comparable restaurants refer to Morton’s steakhouses open for all of fiscal 2010 and the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011.

Revenues increased $7.5.2 million, or ~~10.~~7.8%, to $7871.04 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~ October 32, 2011, from $7066.52 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. Revenues increased $53.62 million, or 85.21%, due to an increase in revenues from comparable restaurants. Revenues increased $1.8 million due to the opening of our Shanghai restaurant in fiscal 2010. Revenues increased $0.12 million due to a net increase in revenues from our Trevi restaurant and other revenues.

Average revenue per restaurant open all of either period being compared increased 9.6.8%. Revenues for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 also reflect the impact of menu price increases of 1.~~2% in June 2010, 1.~~0% in July 2010, 2.7% in December 2010 and 0.9% in January 2011 at our Morton’s steakhouses.

Food and beverage costs increased $2.51 million, or 1110.54%, to $2422.06 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $2120.54 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. The increase was directly related to the increase in sales as well as higher beef and other food costs as compared to the prior year period. Food and beverage costs as a percentage of revenues increased to 3031.76% for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from 30.59% for the three month period ended ~~July~~ October 43, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the impact of higher beef and other food costs, partially offset by menu price increases when compared to the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010.

Restaurant operating expenses, which include labor, occupancy and other operating expenses, increased $32.13 million, or 75.89%, to $4241.42 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $3938.39 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This increase was primarily due to anadditional ~~increase~~operating costs associated with opening our Shanghai restaurant in ~~salaries~~October 2010, ~~wages~~as ~~and~~well ~~other benefits,~~as increased variable costs, which include credit card commissions, ~~related~~payroll toand ~~increased~~percentage ~~sales~~rent, ~~volume~~among ~~and~~other costs, due to the ~~opening~~higher ofsales ~~our Shanghai restaurant in October of 2010~~volume. Included in the three month periods ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010 is a non-cash straight–line rent ~~expense~~ (~~income~~benefit) expense of $(0.1) million and $0.16 million, respectively. Restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 5457.47% for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from 5558.87% for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This decrease was primarily due to the leveraging effect on the fixed cost base caused by positive comparable restaurant revenues.

Pre-opening costs decreased $0.27 million to $0.1 ~~million~~ for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $0.38 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. We expense all costs incurred during restaurant start-up activities, including training, travel and legal, among other costs. The number of restaurants opened, the timing of restaurant openings and the costs per restaurant opened affected the amount of these costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $0.23 million, or 7 12.51%, to $2.78 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $2.5 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This increase was due to depreciation and amortization relating to our Shanghai restaurant, which opened in October 2010, and capital expenditures related to renovations to existing restaurants completed during fiscal 2010 and for the three month period ended October 2, 2011.

General and administrative expenses increased $0.92 million, or 244.21%, to $4.84 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $34.83 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This increase was primarily due to expenses for professional fees associated with the previously announced exploration of strategic alternatives and increased payroll costs, offset by decreases in various other costs including travel. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues ~~increased~~decreased to 6.12% for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from 5 6.4% for the three month period ended ~~July~~ October 43, 2010. ~~These increases were primarily due to increased legal costs associated with various matters and professional fees associated with the previously announced exploration of strategic alternatives.~~

Marketing and promotional expenses ~~decreased~~increased $0.2 million, or 918.87%, to $1.75 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $1.93 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. Marketing and promotional expenses as a percentage of revenues ~~decreased~~increased 0.52% to 2.21% for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from 21.79% during the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. The timing of marketing expenditures affected the amount of these costs.

~~Interest~~Charge ~~expense,~~related ~~net increased $0.4 million, or 45.6%,~~ to ~~$1.3~~legal ~~million~~settlements ~~for the~~of ~~three month period ended July 3, 2011, from~~ $0.92 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 42, ~~2010.~~2011 ~~This~~relates ~~increase was primarily due~~ to the ~~higher~~settlement ~~interest~~of ~~rates~~certain ~~charged~~wage onand ~~the~~hour ~~Company’s~~claims. ~~new~~No ~~credit~~comparable ~~facility~~charge ~~that~~ was ~~entered into~~recorded ~~on December 9, 2010, when compared to~~ in the ~~rates on the~~ prior ~~credit facility that were effective during the three month~~ period ~~ended July 4, 2010~~. ~~Interest income for the three month periods ended July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010 was insignificant.~~

~~Provision~~Interest ~~for~~expense, ~~income~~net ~~taxes~~increased ~~consisted~~$0.4 ofmillion, ~~income~~or ~~tax~~43.2%, ~~expense~~to of $01.24 million ~~and~~for $6the three month period ended October 2,~~000~~ 2011, from $1.0 million for the three month ~~periods~~period ended ~~July~~October 3, ~~2011~~2010. ~~and~~This ~~July~~increase was primarily due to the higher interest rates charged on the Company’s new credit facility that was entered into on December 49, 2010, ~~respectively.~~when ~~Our~~compared to the rates on the prior credit facility that were effective ~~tax~~during ~~rate~~the ~~was~~three ~~25.2%~~month ~~and~~period 4ended October 3, 2010.5% Interest income for the three month periods ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010, ~~respectively~~was insignificant.

~~Net~~Provision for income ~~attributable~~taxes toconsisted ~~noncontrolling~~of ~~interest~~an income tax benefit of $0.13 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~ October 32, 2011 ~~consists of our partners’ 49.99% share of the net income (loss) of the Morton’s steakhouses located in Mexico City~~, ~~Mexico~~compared ~~and Shanghai, China. This compares~~ to aan ~~net~~income ~~loss~~tax ~~attributable~~benefit ~~to noncontrolling interest~~ of $0.14 million for the three month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010,. ~~consisting~~Our ofeffective ~~our~~tax ~~partners’~~rate 49was 13.990% ~~share~~and of14.1% ~~the~~for ~~net income (loss) of~~ the ~~Morton’s~~three ~~steakhouse~~month ~~located~~periods inended ~~Mexico City~~October 2, ~~Mexico~~2011 and ~~the startup costs for our Shanghai restaurant which opened in~~ October of 3, 2010, respectively.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of $0.1 million for the three month period ended October 2, 2011 consists of our partners’ 49.99% share of the net income related to our variable interest entities. This compares to a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest of $(0.3) million for the three month period ended October 3, 2010, consisting of our partners’ 49.99% share of the net loss related to our variable interest entities. The net loss was primarily due to pre-opening costs related to our Shanghai restaurant that opened in October 2010.

~~Six~~Nine Month Period Ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 (2639 weeks) compared to ~~Six~~Nine Month Period Ended ~~July~~ October 43, 2010 (2639 weeks)

Our income from continuing operations attributable to controlling interest for the nine ~~six~~ month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 was $20.84 million, compared to a net loss of $1(0.56) million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. The change is primarily due to improved operating results from an increase in comparable restaurant revenues, net of related food and beverage and restaurant operating costs, which was offset by higher interest and income tax expense. For purposes of this discussion, comparable restaurants refer to Morton’s steakhouses open for all of fiscal 2010 and the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011.

Revenues increased $1419.79 million, or 109.14%, to $~~160~~231.5 9 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $~~145~~212.80 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. Revenues increased $1114.02 million, or 7.80%, due to an increase in revenues from comparable restaurants. Revenues increased $35.20 million due to the opening of our Shanghai restaurant in fiscal 2010. Revenues increased $0.57 million due to a net increase in revenues from our Trevi restaurant and other revenues.

Average revenue per restaurant open all of either period being compared increased 8.92%. Revenues for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~ October 32, 2011 also reflect the impact of menu price increases of 1.2% in June 2010, 1.0% in July 2010, 2.7% in December 2010 and 0.9% in January 2011 at our Morton’s steakhouses.

Food and beverage costs increased $57.46 million, or 1211.37%, to $4972.6 1 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $4464.16 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. The increase was directly related to the increase in sales as well as higher beef and other food costs as compared to the prior year period. Food and beverage costs as a percentage of revenues increased to 3031.91% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from 30.35% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the impact of higher beef and other food costs, partially offset by menu price increases when compared to the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010.

Restaurant operating expenses, which include labor, occupancy and other operating expenses, increased $4.7.0 million, or 5.89%, to $85126.34 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $80119.6 4 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This increase was primarily due to anadditional ~~increase~~operating costs associated with opening our Shanghai restaurant in ~~salaries~~October 2010, ~~wages~~as ~~and~~well ~~other~~as ~~benefits~~increased variable costs, ~~increased~~which include credit card commissions, payroll and ~~increased~~percentage rent, among other costs, due to the ~~opening~~higher ofsales ~~our Shanghai restaurant during fiscal 2010~~volume. Included in the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010 is non-cash straight–line rent ~~expense~~ (~~income~~benefit) expense of $(0.24) million and $0.28 million, respectively. Restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased 1.8% to 5354.15% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from 5556.3% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This decrease was primarily due to the leveraging effect on the fixed cost base caused by positive comparable restaurant revenues.

Pre-opening costs ~~remained~~decreased ~~consistent~~$0.8 ~~with~~million, ~~the~~or ~~prior~~65.8%, ~~year~~to at $0.4 million for the ~~six~~nine month ~~periods~~ period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, ~~and~~from ~~July~~$1.2 million for the nine month period ended October 43, 2010. We expense all costs incurred during restaurant start-up activities, including training, travel and legal, among other costs. The number of restaurants opened, the timing of restaurant openings and the costs per restaurant opened affected the amount of these costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $0.47 million, or 78.07%, to $58.42 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $57.05 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This increase was due to depreciation and amortization relating to our Shanghai restaurant, which opened in October 2010, and capital expenditures related to renovations to existing restaurants completed during fiscal 2010 and the nine month period ended October 2, 2011.

General and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million, or 2013.9%, to $914.81 million for the nine ~~six~~ month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $812.13 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. These increases were primarily due to increased legal costs associated with various matters, expenses for professional fees associated with the previously announced exploration of strategic alternatives and increased payroll costs, offset by decreases in various other costs including travel. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 6.1% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from 5.58% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. ~~These increases were primarily due to increased legal costs associated with various matters and professional fees associated with the previously announced exploration of strategic alternatives.~~

Marketing and promotional expenses ~~decreased~~increased $0.12 million, or 14.70%, to $34.27 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $34.36 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. Marketing and promotional expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased 0.32% to 2.0% for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~ October 32, 2011, from 2.32% during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. The timing of marketing expenditures affected the amount of these costs.

Charge related to legal settlements of $0.59 million for the ~~six~~ nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 relates to the settlement of certain wage and hour and similar labor claims. Charge related to legal settlements of $0.5 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010 relates to the change in the fair value of the Company’s Preferred Stock issued in February 2010 in connection with the fiscal 2009 settlement of certain wage and hour litigation. The charge represents the final adjustment to the fair value of the Preferred Stock as of the January 28, 2010 court approval date. The fair value of the Preferred Stock issued in the settlement was calculated based on market conditions at the time of issuance using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Interest expense, net increased $01.8 2 million, or 43.3%, to $24.71 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, from $12.9 8 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the higher interest rates charged on the Company’s new credit facility that was entered into on December 9, 2010, when compared to the rates on the prior credit facility that was effective during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010. Interest income for the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010 was insignificant.

Provision for income taxes consisted of income tax expense of $0.85 million and $~~0.4~~43,000 ~~million~~ for the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010, respectively. Our effective tax rate was 2245.10% and 24(4.13)% for the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~ October 43, 2010, respectively.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of $0.12 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 consists of our partners’ 49.99% share of the net income ~~(loss)~~related ofto ~~the Morton’s~~our ~~steakhouses~~variable ~~located~~interest ~~in Mexico City, Mexico and Shanghai, China~~entities. This compares to a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest of $(0.14) million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 43, 2010, consisting of our partners’ 49.99% share of the net ~~income (~~loss) ofrelated ~~the~~to ~~Morton’s~~our ~~steakhouse~~variable ~~located~~interest inentities. ~~Mexico~~The ~~City,~~net ~~Mexico~~loss ~~and~~was ~~the~~primarily ~~startup~~due to pre-opening costs ~~for~~related to our Shanghai ~~Steakhouse~~restaurant ~~which~~that opened ~~later~~ in ~~fiscal~~ October 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity requirements are to meet our lease obligations, ~~and~~ our working capital and capital expenditure needs and to pay principal and interest on our debt. Subject to our operating performance, which, if significantly adversely affected, would negatively affect the availability of funds, we expect to finance our operations for fiscal 2011 through cash provided by operations and borrowings available under our Senior Credit Facility. In addition, we rely to a significant degree on landlord development allowances and/or loans as a means of financing the costs of opening new restaurants, and any substantial reduction in the amount of those landlord development allowances and/or loans could adversely affect our liquidity. We had cash and cash equivalents of $1.21 million as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and $1.2 million as of January 2, 2011.

Based on our current projections, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents and cash flow from operations, together with amounts available under our Senior Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital and investment requirements and our debt service obligations for the next twelve months. If available liquidity is not sufficient to meet these requirements and obligations as they come due, our plans include reducing expenditures as necessary in order to meet our cash requirements. However, there can be no assurance that any such reductions in expenditures would be sufficient to enable us to meet our cash requirement needs.

Working Capital and Cash Flows

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, we had, and in the future we may have, negative working capital balances. Our operations have not required significant working capital and, like many restaurant companies, we have been able to operate with negative working capital since our restaurant guests pay for their food and beverage purchases in cash or by credit card at the time of sale, and we are able to sell many of our food inventory items before payment is due to our suppliers. Our receivables primarily represent amounts due from credit card processors, which arise when customers pay by credit card, and are included in “Accounts Receivable” in our consolidated balance sheets. We receive trade credit based upon negotiated terms in purchasing food and supplies. Funds available from cash sales not needed immediately to pay for food and supplies or to finance receivables or inventories have typically been used for capital expenditures and/or to repay debt.

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 was $45.38 million and primarily consisted of net income of $20.97 million that included non-cash depreciation, amortization and ~~other~~changes ~~non-cash~~related ~~charges~~to our deferred tax liability of $68.46 million, which was offset by cash outflows primarily for the payment of accounts payable and accrued expenses, as well as other changes in assets and liabilities, of $53.05 million. The improvement in cash flow from operations over the prior year period was due to higher net income and lower cash required for working capital items.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 was $56.48 million and consisted of purchases of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 was $01.60 million and primarily consisted of proceeds from net borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility of $12.2 million, partially offset by cash ~~used~~deposited ~~for~~into restricted accounts, the payment of minimum income taxes relating to shares vested and surrendered by employees and other financing uses of cash of $01.62 million.

Contractual Commitments

Restaurant Operating Leases

Our lease obligations include certain restaurant operating leases for which we, or one of our subsidiaries, guarantee for a portion of the lease term, the performance of the lease by the subsidiary operating company that is a party thereto.

See Note 8 “Long-Term Debt” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a discussion of our debt obligations. The following table represents our contractual commitments associated with our debt, lease and other obligations as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

	2011		2012		2013		2014		2015		Thereafter		Total
Senior credit facility	$	2,~~831~~400	$	4,892	$	5,~~538~~539	$	5,538	$	3839,~~039~~439	$	—	$	5657,~~838~~808
Interest on senior credit facility (a)		21,~~053~~048		3,~~535~~628		3,~~190~~282		2,~~823~~916		2,~~336~~424		—		13,~~937~~298
Mortgage loan		9246		196		215		235		257		1,~~811~~812		2,~~806~~761
Interest on mortgage loan (a)		~~126~~63		239		220		200		178		474		1,~~437~~374
JV Loans Payable		1,165		1,885		1,900		938		440		1,229		7,557
JV loans payable		320		1,885		1,900		1,610		440		878		7,033
Interest on JV loans payable (a)		7922		5569		2539		512		—		—		~~164~~142
Non-recourse loan		—		—		—		1,638		—		—		1,638
Interest on non-recourse loan (a)		6633		131		131		98		—		—		~~426~~393
Subtotal		63,~~412~~932		1011,~~933~~040		11,~~219~~326		1112,~~475~~247		4142,~~250~~738		3,~~514~~164		84,~~803~~447
Operating leases		136,~~764~~832		29,~~259~~095		30,~~097~~213		2930,~~757~~092		2728,~~916~~260		~~143~~147,~~364~~920		~~274~~272,~~157~~412
Legal settlements		~~1,190~~845		1,883		1,600		—		—		—		4,~~673~~328
Purchase commitments		115,~~094~~677		—		—		—		—		—		115,~~094~~677
Total	$	3217,~~460~~286	$	42,~~075~~018	$	4243,~~916~~139	$	4142,~~232~~339	$	6970,~~166~~998	$	~~146~~151,~~878~~084	$	~~374~~366,~~727~~864

(a) Interest is based on borrowings as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and interest rates as of ~~July~~October 2827, 2011.

Capital Expenditures

During the first ~~six~~nine months of fiscal 2011, our expenditures for fixed assets and related investment costs, plus pre-opening costs, approximated $57.83 million. We estimate that we will expend up to an aggregate of $78.90 million in fiscal 2011 for fixed assets and related investment costs, including pre-opening costs of approximately $0.4 million, for the relocation of one restaurant, ordinary refurbishment of existing restaurants and to remodel ~~the~~ the bar area in selected restaurants to include our Bar 12—•21 concept. Cash capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 are expected to be reduced by landlord contributions of approximately $0.14 million. We anticipate that funds generated through operations and through borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility, together with landlord contributions, will be sufficient to fund these currently planned expenditures through the end of fiscal 2011. We cannot be sure, however, that this will be the case.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The inherent risk in market risk sensitive instruments and positions primarily relates to the potential for losses arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and beef and other food product prices.

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, we owned and operated six international restaurants, one each in ~~Hong~~ Hong Kong, China; Macau, China; Shanghai, China; Mexico City, Mexico; Singapore; and Toronto, Canada. As a result, we are subject to risk from changes in foreign exchange rates. The cash flow risk associated with these rate changes is largely ~~mitigated~~ mitigated by ~~the fact that~~ both revenues and expenses of these locations ~~are~~being denominated in ~~the~~ local currency, which is also the functional currency. However, these changes result in cumulative translation adjustments, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. We do not consider the potential loss resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates, as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, to be material.

We also are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our financing activities. This exposure relates to borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility that are payable at floating rates of interest. Our other indebtedness, including our mortgage, non-recourse loan and joint venture loans, are payable at fixed rates of interest. As of ~~July~~October 32, 2011, there were borrowings outstanding under our floating rate Senior Credit Facility of $5657.8 million. As a result, a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in interest rates would have an impact of approximately $0.4 million on pre-tax earnings for the nine ~~six~~ month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011.

We are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef and other food product prices, this exposure can impact our food and beverage costs. Since we typically set our menu prices in advance of our beef and other food product purchases, we cannot quickly take into account changing costs of beef and other food items. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our guests through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. To manage this risk in part, we attempt to enter into fixed price purchase commitments. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in beef or other food product prices. As a result, a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in beef costs would have an impact of approximately $23.2 million on pre-tax earnings for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. These include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~July~~October 32, 2011 at the reasonable assurance level. No changes were made in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls ~~subsequent~~ subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Part II - —Other Information

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

See Note 12 “Legal Matters and Contingencies” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a summary of legal proceedings.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There are no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011, except as set forth in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2011.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011, the Company did not purchase shares of its common stock.

Item 5.

Other Information

In accordance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, if a stockholder wants the Company to include a proposal in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy for presentation at its 2012 Annual Meeting, the proposal must be received by the Company on or before December 16, 2011.

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101		The following materials from Morton’s Restaurant Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 are furnished herewith, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~July~~October 32, ~~3011~~2011 and January 2, 2011 - unaudited, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three- and ~~Six~~Nine-Months Ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010 - unaudited, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Six~~Nine-Months Ended ~~July~~October 32, 2011 and ~~July~~October 43, 2010 - unaudited, and (iv) the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

*	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
		(Registrant)
Date:	~~August~~November 21, 2011	By:	/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ARTINIAN
			Christopher J. Artinian
			Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
			(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:	~~August~~November 21, 2011	By:	/s/ RONALD M. DINELLA
			Ronald M. DiNella
			Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
			(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · MORTONS RESTAURANT GROUP INC