UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): ~~May~~June 2624, 2011

HQ SUSTAINABLE MARITIME ~~INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

001-33473

62-1407522

(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)

(Commission

File Number)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Melbourne Towers, 1511 Third Avenue, Suite 788, Seattle, WA 98101

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(206) 621-9888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

¨	Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

¨	Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

¨	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

¨	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 3.01. Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing.

On ~~May 27~~June 24, 2011, HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) received ana ~~additional~~notice ~~deficiency letter~~ from the NYSE Amex LLC (the “Exchange”) ~~due~~stating tothat the Exchange staff has determined that the Company’s ~~inability~~previously tosubmitted ~~timely~~plan ~~file~~of ~~its~~compliance, ~~Quarterly~~as ~~Report~~amended onand ~~Form~~supplemented, ~~10-Q~~did ~~for~~not ~~the~~make ~~period~~a ~~ended~~reasonable ~~March 31,~~demonstration ~~2011~~of (the ~~“Quarterly~~Company’s ~~Report”).~~ability to regain compliance with Sections 134 and 1101 of the Exchange Company Guide. The Exchange noted that, in addition to the previous continued listing deficiencies (as recited below), the “Company ~~Guide”~~was being subject to delisting pursuant to Section 1003(f)(iii) of ~~require~~the ~~timely~~Exchange ~~filing~~Company Guide in that, in the opinion of ~~such~~the ~~periodic~~Exchange ~~reports~~staff, ~~with~~the Company or its management has engaged in operations, which, in the ~~Securities~~opinion ~~and~~of the Exchange ~~Commission~~staff, are contrary to the public interest. ~~The~~In ~~staff~~addition, the Exchange also noted that the Company was also subject to delisting pursuant to Section 132(e) of the Exchange (Company Guide in that, in the opinion of the Exchange staff, the Company made “~~Staff~~…a material representation to the Exchange” which relates to the circumstances of the purported independent review by the Audit Committee of the Board in May 2011. Finally, the Exchange noticed the Company with an additional continued listing deficiency under Section 803B(4) ~~cited~~of the Exchange Company’s ~~failure~~Guide which requires that the Audit Committee of each issuer must have the specific audit committee responsibilities, authority and procedures necessary to ~~file~~comply ~~its~~with ~~Quarterly~~Rule ~~Report~~10A-3(b)(4) ~~within~~and (5) under the Exchange Act, concerning responsibilities relating to authority to engage advisors and funding for compensation to be paid to such advisors as determined by the ~~prescribed~~Audit ~~filing~~Committee. ~~deadline~~Accordingly, inthe ~~its~~Exchange ~~determination~~notified the Company that, based on the previously noticed and foregoing deficiencies, the Company’s common stock was subject to delisting from the Exchange (the “Staff Determination”). The Company has ~~failed~~determined not to ~~comply~~appeal ~~with~~this ~~certain~~Staff ~~continued~~Determination ~~listing~~and, ~~standards~~consequently, ofnotified the Exchange of its intent.

As previously reported, on April 1, 2011, the Company ~~remains~~received ~~out~~a ofnotice from the Exchange notifying the Company that was not in compliance with continued listing standards set forth under Sections 134 and 1101 of the Exchange Company Guide since the Company iswas yet to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. InOn ~~addition~~April 11, on2011, the Company received another notice from the Exchange notifying the Company that, following resignation of its independent nonexecutive director and the Chairman of the Audit Committee effective April 11 6, 2011, the Company was ~~notified~~not ofin ~~non-~~compliance with continued listing standards set forth under Sections 802(a) and 803(B)(2)(a) of the Exchange Company Guide. ~~The~~ ~~foregoing~~Finally, ~~Sections~~on ~~require~~May a27, ~~listed~~2011, ~~company~~the toCompany ~~maintain~~received aan ~~majority~~additional ofdeficiency ~~independent~~letter ~~directors~~from onthe ~~its~~Exchange ~~Board~~due ofto ~~Directors~~the ~~and~~Company’s atinability ~~least~~to timely ~~three~~file ~~independent~~its ~~directors~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ~~Company’s~~period ~~Audit~~ended ~~Committee~~March 31, 2011. The trading in the Company’s securities remains halted.

~~The~~Item ~~Company submitted to the Staff a plan of compliance in connection with the continued listing deficiencies~~7. If the Company’s plan to regain compliance is accepted by the Exchange, the Company may be able to continue its listing during this period, during which time it will be subject to periodic review to determine progress consistent with the plan01. ~~If,~~Regulation ~~however,~~FD the plan is not accepted by the Exchange, the Company will be subject to delisting procedures as set forth in the Company Guide. Under Company Guide rules, the Company has the right to appeal the determination by the Exchange staff to initiate delisting proceedings. There is no assurance that the Exchange staff will accept the Company’s plan of compliance or that, even if such plan is accepted, the Company will be able to implement the plan within the prescribed timeframe. Disclosure

~~Item~~On 4July 1, 2011, the Company issued a press release announcing the foregoing.01 ~~Changes~~A incopy ~~Registrant’s~~of ~~Certifying~~the ~~Accountant~~press release is attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 99.1 and the information therein is incorporated herein by reference.

On May 26, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company received a written notice from the Company’s auditing firm of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP (“SLF”) that the client-auditor relationship between the Company and SLF has ceased. The written correspondence contained no further information and is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.3.

As described in detail below, the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 has not been completed and, therefore, SLF did not provide its report in connection with such financial statements for the subject period. In addition, the preparation and review of the interim financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 are also yet to be completed. The SLF reports on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and subsequent interim periods did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. Similarly, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the subsequent interim periods, the Company had no disagreements with SLF on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of SLF, would have caused SLF to make reference to the matter in its report, except as follows:

During the course of the audit work relating to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Company learned that SLF was not licensed to provide auditing services for the Company and its PRC subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”). This information came to the Company’s attention when SLF insisted upon application of certain heightened, more stringent procedures than those utilized by SLF in prior audits of the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, those procedures related to confirmation and verification procedures that involved the collection of information directly from the sources of such information, such as vendors, customers and financial institutions in connection with the 2010 audit work. SLF’s attempt to implement these new direct collection procedures raised the issue of SLF’s lack of PRC licensing since such licensing is a legal pre-requisite for direct collection of information in connection with an audit in the PRC.

The Company also learned that the PRC Ministry of Finance has reconfirmed its policies regarding the performance of fieldwork by foreign auditing firms auditing the financial statements of companies with operations in the PRC. The PRC rules and regulations governing licensing matters require, among other things, that foreign accounting firms obtain administrative permits to conduct auditing services in the PRC, comply with PRC laws regulating the confidentiality and secrecy of information, and keep audit working papers within the PRC. Violators of the foregoing requirements could be subject to legal sanctions in the PRC, ranging from fines and suspension of business licenses to criminal prosecution. Notwithstanding repeated inquiries by the Company, SLF neither confirmed nor denied that it was not properly licensed to provide auditing services in the PRC.

As an alternative to SLF’s more stringent confirmation procedures and a safeguard against violating applicable PRC rules and regulations, the Company proposed that SLF and the Company employ certain “chain of custody” procedures in the confirmation and verification procedures to be utilized in the audit, which the Company believed would satisfy Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. Those proposed procedures involved the proposed collection of the requisite information by the Company in the presence of SLF. Notwithstanding SLF’s initial agreement to utilize such procedures, SLF subsequently and without explanation elected not to utilize this alternative and reverted to its demand to utilize the more stringent confirmation procedures. Thereafter in early May 2011, SLF requested that the Company (and its subsidiaries’) provide certain written representations to be submitted by SLF to the PRC Ministry of Finance in connection with an application SLF intended to make for a Temporary Practice Permit for Offshore Accounting Firm in accordance with the PRC Ministry of Finance’s Interim Provisions on Temporary Auditing Business Activities Carried Out in China Mainland by Offshore Accounting Firms. The Company and SLF apparently have conflicting understandings of those regulations. The Company believes that the subject legal scheme precludes SLF from obtaining such a temporary permit by virtue of SLF’s prior activities in the PRC, and the Company has continued to press SLF to utilize alternative procedures. SLF disagreed with the Company’s view of that regulatory scheme. If the Company’s assessment is correct, the written support that SLF requested that the Company (and its subsidiaries) provided could have subjected the Company to administrative sanctions in the event that the PRC authorities determined that SLF engaged in unpermitted auditing business activities in Hainan Province. The Company, therefore, declined to provide the written authorizations sought by SLF. Subsequently on May 26, 2011, SLF tendered its resignation letter filed as an exhibit to this Current Report.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors discussed the foregoing matters with SLF on a number of occasions. On April 11, 2011, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, disclosing Chairman of the Audit Committee’s resignation from the Audit Committee and the Board at large. Mr. Intrater’s resignation letter cited differences and disagreements with management as the basis for his resignation. A copy of that letter was filed as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2011.

On May 25, 2011 a representative of SLF placed a telephone call to Mr. Fred Bild, a member of the Company’s Audit Committee, and informed him that SLF would resign because of its inability to proceed due to the lack of support from management in SLF efforts to complete the audit.

As of the date hereof, the Company has not engaged a registered independent public accounting firm to succeed SLF and to audit its 2010 financial statements. When the Company does engage a new firm, however, the Company intends to authorize SLF to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor accounting firm concerning the foregoing matters.

In addition, except as set forth elsewhere in this filing, during SLF’s engagement with the Company and in the subsequent interim periods through its resignation, SLF did not advise the Company:

(i) that the internal controls necessary for the Company to develop reliable financial statements do not exist;

(ii) that information had come to its attention that had led it to no longer be able to rely on management’s representations, or that had made SLF unwilling to be associated with the financial statements prepared by management,

(iii) of the need to expand significantly the scope of its audit; or

(iv) that information had come to its attention that if further investigated (i) might materially impact the fairness or reliability of either a previously issued audit report or the underlying financial statements or the financial statements issued or to be issued covering the fiscal periods subsequent to the date of the most recent financial statements covered by an audit report (including information that may prevent it from rendering an unqualified audit report on those financial statements) or (ii) might cause SLF to be unwilling to rely on management’s representations or to be associated with the Company’s financial statements, or that for any reason, the issue has not been resolved to SLF’s satisfaction prior to its resignation.

In accordance with Item 304(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, a copy of the draft of this Current Report on Form 8-K has been provided to SLF with a request that SLF furnish the Company a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. No such letter has been provided to the Company as of the filing date of this Current Report. However, SLF provided a letter addressed to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors in which SLF stated, among other things, that “… the draft Form 8-K does not accurately set forth the reasons for the resignation of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP…” In addition, SLF, in the same letter to the Audit Committee stated, among other things, that “…SLF’s resignation was the result of culmination of several factors which lead SLF to conclude that it could no longer rely upon representations of HQ’s management and, thus, lead SLF to decide to resign as HQ’s auditors.” A true copy of SLF’s letter to the Audit Committee is filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report. Any references to such letter are qualified in their entirety by the text of the letter. All readers of this Current Report are encouraged to read the entire text of such letter. In addition, on a call between the Company’s and SLF’s counsel, SLF’s counsel cited several factors for SLF’s resignation, including, among other things, difficulties in confirming receivable balances in the PRC, the Company’s management’s resistance to SLF’s suggestions, lack of cooperation and promptness by the Company’s management in connection with SLF’s request relating to its temporary licensing application in the PRC, lack of promptness in sharing of the information with SLF relating to the Company’s submissions to the NYSE Amex, and SLF’s understanding that, contrary to the Company’s representations to the NYSE Amex, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors authorized engagement of independent counsel to investigate circumstances leading to the Company’s inability to complete the 2010 audit and file its Annual Report within the prescribed timeframe.

The Company is in the process of searching for a new independent registered auditing firm. The Company will provide details of such engagement upon completion of the engagement process.

Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.

On June 2, 2011, the Company issued a press release announcing the receipt of the additional deficiency letter from the Exchange. A copy of the press release is attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 99.1 and the information therein is incorporated herein by reference.

The information reported under Item 7.01 in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Item 9.01

Exhibits

99.1		Press release dated June 2, 2011
99.2		Letter from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP
99.3		Termination letter from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP


99.1		Press release.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. By: /s/ Norbert Sporns Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer

Date: ~~June 2~~July 1, 2011

Exhibit Index

ExhibitNo.		Description
Exhibit No.		Description
99.1		Press release ~~dated June 2, 2011~~
99.2		Letter from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP
99.3		Termination letter from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP

Filing Compare · HQ SUSTAINABLE MARITIME INDUSTRIES, INC.