UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period from to

Commission file number: 333-138009

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware

11-3735091

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

11717 Exploration Lane, Germantown, Maryland 20876

(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)

(301) 428-5500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

The number of ~~the~~ the registrant’s membership interests outstanding as of ~~July~~October 3029, 2010 was as follows:


Class A Membership Interests: 95,000		Class B Membership Interests: 3,280

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1	1
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31	32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	50	52
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	52	53
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION		53	54
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	53	54
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	53	54
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	53	54
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	53	54
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	54	55
Item 5.	Other Information	54	55
Item 6.	Exhibits	54	55
SIGNATURES		55	56

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~103~~112,~~181~~661		$	183,733
Marketable securities		2515,~~020~~000			31,126
Receivables, net		~~158~~161,~~852~~872			162,806
Inventories		5856,~~349~~937			60,244
Prepaid expenses and other		2224,~~876~~412			20,976
Total current assets		~~368~~370,~~278~~882			458,885
Property, net		~~665~~728,~~796~~360			601,964
Capitalized software costs, net		47,~~896~~727			49,776
Intangible assets, net		1211,~~103~~421			13,488
Goodwill		2,661			2,661
Other assets		6564,~~849~~084			68,524
Total assets	$	1,~~162~~225,~~583~~135		$	1,195,298
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	~~100~~131,~~068~~598		$	117,513
Short-term debt		6,~~761~~133			6,750
Accrued liabilities and other		~~125~~145,~~328~~374			133,926
Total current liabilities		~~232~~283,~~157~~105			258,189
Long-term debt		~~712~~713,~~984~~135			714,957
Other long-term liabilities		1820,~~965~~963			16,191
Total liabilities		~~964~~1,~~106~~017,203			989,337
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Hughes Network Systems, LLC (“HNS”) equity:
Class A membership interests		~~178~~175,~~381~~934			177,933
Class B membership interests		-			-
Retained earnings		3344,~~326~~126			36,094
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1918,~~079~~158	)		(13,987	)
Total HNS’ equity		~~192~~201,~~628~~902			200,040
Noncontrolling interest		56,~~849~~030			5,921
Total equity		~~198~~207,~~477~~932			205,961
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,~~162~~225,~~583~~135		$	1,195,298

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenues:
Services revenues	$	~~192~~200,~~155~~709		$	~~172~~175,~~662~~305		$	~~379~~579,~~045~~754		$	~~334~~509,~~566~~871
Hardware sales		5964,~~178~~006			8275,~~444~~164			~~114~~178,~~431~~437			~~160~~235,~~294~~458
Total revenues		~~251~~264,~~333~~715			~~255~~250,~~106~~469			~~493~~758,~~476~~191			~~494~~745,~~860~~329
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of services		~~123~~125,~~206~~806			~~111~~108,~~092~~894			~~238~~364,~~856~~662			~~217~~326,~~638~~532
Cost of hardware products sold		5558,~~582~~356			7773,~~283~~646			~~116~~174,~~468~~824			~~151~~225,~~488~~134
Selling, general and administrative		4748,~~402~~665			44,~~301~~204			96144,~~082~~747			88132,~~098~~302
Loss on impairment		-			~~44,400~~-			-			44,400
Research and development		54,~~355~~776			5,~~698~~453			1015,~~270~~046			1116,~~049~~502
Amortization of intangible assets		~~683~~682			1,~~386~~385			12,~~385~~067			24,~~771~~156
Total operating costs and expenses		~~232~~238,~~228~~285			~~284~~233,~~160~~582			~~463~~701,~~061~~346			~~515~~749,~~444~~026
Operating income (loss)		1926,~~105~~430			~~(29~~16,~~054~~887	)		3056,~~415~~845			(203,~~584~~697	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(1514,~~515~~493	)		(1517,~~550~~727	)		(3146,~~620~~113	)		(2947,~~379~~106	)
Interest income		~~574~~359			~~170~~468			1,~~127~~486			~~397~~865
Other loss, net		-			(~~364~~1	)		-			(~~364~~365	)
Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit		4,164			(44,798	)		(78	)		(49,930	)
Income (loss) before income tax expense		12,296			(373	)		12,218			(50,303	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(1,563	)		(462	)		(2,780	)		206
Income tax expense		(1,551	)		(981	)		(4,331	)		(775	)
Net income (loss)		210,~~601~~745			(451,~~260~~354	)		(27,~~858~~887	)		(4951,~~724~~078	)
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		~~193~~55			(~~450~~216	)		90145			(~~840~~1,056	)
Net income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	210,~~794~~800		$	(451,~~710~~570	)	$	(28,~~768~~032	)	$	(5052,~~564~~134	)

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	HNS’ Equity
	Class A and BMembershipInterests			~~Retained Earnings~~RetainedEarnings			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveLoss			NoncontrollingInterest			Total
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	177,425		$	80,999		$	(27,586	)	$	4,632		$	235,470
Share-based compensation		~~439~~673												~~439~~673
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest		(391	)					(19	)		(345	)		(755	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)					(5052,~~564~~134	)					~~840~~1,056			(4951,~~724~~078	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments								5,~~052~~505			90167			5,~~142~~672
Unrealized gain on hedging instruments								52,~~368~~639			-			52,~~368~~639
Reclassification of realized loss on hedging instruments								13,~~965~~275			-			13,~~965~~275
Balance at June 30, 2009	$	177,864		$	30,435		$	(15,201	)	$	5,562		$	198,660
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities								(2	)		-			(2	)
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	177,707		$	28,865		$	(16,188	)	$	5,510		$	195,894
Balance at January 1, 2010	$	177,933		$	36,094		$	(13,987	)	$	5,921		$	205,961
Share-based compensation		~~448~~674												~~448~~674
Retirement of bonus units		(2,673	)											(2,673	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss					(2,768	)					(90	)		(2,858	)
Net income (loss)					8,032						(145	)		7,887
Foreign currency translation adjustments								~~(2,440~~458	)		18254			~~(2,422~~712	)
Unrealized loss on hedging instruments								(58,~~434~~796	)		-			(58,~~434~~796	)
Reclassification of realized loss on hedging instruments								24,~~783~~173			-			24,~~783~~173
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities								(16	)		-			(16	)
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	178,381		$	33,326		$	(19,079	)	$	5,849		$	198,477
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	175,934		$	44,126		$	(18,158	)	$	6,030		$	207,932

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(2,858	)	$	(49,724	)
Net income (loss)	$	7,887		$	(51,078	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		6195,~~784~~127			4672,~~079~~788
Amortization of debt issuance costs		12,~~323~~048			~~891~~1,452
Share-based compensation expense		~~448~~674			~~439~~665
Loss on impairment		-			44,400
Other		8334			~~363~~578
Change in other operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:
Receivables, net		21,~~028~~454			1848,~~720~~922
Inventories		13,~~046~~172			(~~169~~745	)
Prepaid expenses and other		~~733~~1,065			4(2,~~591~~531	)
Accounts payable		~~(18~~14,~~396~~024	)		524,~~592~~261
Accrued liabilities and other		(415,~~120~~419	)		(15,~~419~~657	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		42110,~~071~~066			55123,~~763~~055
Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash		9449			51(72	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(3237,615	)		-(25,080	)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		3853,615			-
Expenditures for property		(~~121~~183,~~302~~531	)		(5393,~~296~~953	)
Expenditures for capitalized software		(69,~~170~~935	)		(710,~~762~~315	)
Proceeds from sale of property		~~264~~404			93339
Net cash used in investing activities		(121,114	)		(60,914	)
Long-term loan receivable		-			(10,000	)
Other, net		-			(755	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(177,013	)		(139,836	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Short-term revolver borrowings		3,~~263~~770			-
Repayments of revolver borrowings		(34,~~745~~881	)		-
Net decrease in notes and loans payable		-			(781,315	)
Long-term debt borrowings		23,~~533~~334			~~141~~142,~~107~~318
Repayments of long-term debt		(34,~~927~~864	)		(56,~~503~~832	)
Debt issuance costs		(1,734	)		(4,~~500~~612	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(34,~~610~~375	)		~~131~~129,~~026~~559
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		~~2,101~~250			(13,~~741~~879	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(8071,~~552~~072	)		~~124~~108,~~134~~899
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		183,733			100,262
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	~~103~~112,~~181~~661		$	~~224~~209,~~396~~161
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	3336,~~551~~141		$	2629,~~588~~182
Cash paid for income taxes	$	45,~~594~~919		$	23,~~427~~660
Supplemental non-cash disclosures related to:
Capitalized software and property acquired, not paid	$	2350,~~113~~787

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1: Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Hughes Network Systems, LLC (“HNS” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”) was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on November 12, 2004. The Limited Liability Company Agreement of Hughes Network Systems, LLC, as amended (the “LLC Agreement”) provides for two classes of membership interests. The Class A membership interests, which have voting rights, are purchased by investors in the Company. The Class B membership interests, which do not have voting rights, are available for grant to employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company in exchange for the performance of services. Hughes Communications, Inc. (“HCI” or “Parent”) is the sole owner of our Class A membership interests and serves as our managing member, as defined in the LLC Agreement. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there were 95,000 Class A membership interests outstanding and 3,280 Class B membership interests outstanding.

We are a telecommunications company that provides equipment and services to the broadband communications marketplace. We have extensive technical expertise in satellite, wireline and wireless communications which we utilize in a number of product and service offerings. In particular, we offer a spectrum of broadband equipment and services to the managed services market, which is comprised of enterprises with a requirement to connect a large number of geographically dispersed locations with reliable, scalable, and cost-effective applications, such as credit card verification, inventory tracking and control, and broadcast video. We provide broadband network services and systems to the international and domestic enterprise markets and satellite broadband Internet access to North American consumers, which we refer to as the Consumer market. In addition, we provide networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite, telematics and wireless backhaul systems. These services are generally provided on a contract or project basis and may involve the use of proprietary products engineered by us.

We have five reportable segments, which we operate and manage as strategic business units and organize by products and services. We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on the operating earnings of the respective segments. Our business segments include: (i) the North America Broadband segment; (ii) the International Broadband segment; (iii) the Telecom Systems segment; (iv) the HTS Satellite segment; and (v) the Corporate segment. The North America Broadband segment consists of the Consumer group, which delivers broadband internet service to consumer customers, and the Enterprise group, which provides satellite, wireline and wireless communication networks and services to enterprises. The International Broadband segment consists of our international service companies and provides managed network services and equipment to enterprise customers and broadband service providers worldwide. The Telecom Systems segment consists of the Mobile Satellite Systems group, the Telematics group, and the Terrestrial Microwave group. The Mobile Satellite Systems group provides turnkey satellite ground segment systems to mobile system operators. The Telematics group previously provided development engineering and manufacturing services to Hughes Telematics, Inc. (“HTI”). However, as a result of the unfavorable impact of the economy on the automobile industry, HTI terminated substantially all of the development engineering and manufacturing services with us in August 2009. We expect our future revenue from the Telematics group to be insignificant. The Terrestrial Microwave group provides point-to-multipoint microwave radio network systems that are used for both cellular backhaul and broadband wireless access. The HTS Satellite segment, which is a new segment starting in 2010, consists of activities related to the development, construction and launch of high throughput satellites (“HTS”) and currently represents construction activities of our new satellite named Jupiter. As a result of the newly established HTS Satellite segment in 2010, construction activities of Jupiter in 2009, which was included in the North America Broad band segment, have been reclassified to the HTS Satellite segment to conform to the current period presentation. The Corporate segment includes our corporate offices and assets not specifically related to another business segment.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with: (i) generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information; (ii) the instructions to Form 10-Q; and (iii) the guidance of Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for financial statements required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). They include the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the Company, including its domestic and foreign subsidiaries that are more than 50% owned or for which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”) 810 “Consolidation.” Entities in which the Company holds at least 20% ownership or in which there are other indicators of significant influence are generally accounted for by the equity method, whereby the Company records its proportionate share of the entities’ results of operations. Entities in which the Company holds less than 20% ownership and does not have the ability to exercise

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

significant influence are generally carried at cost. As permitted under Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, certain notes and other financial information normally required by GAAP have been condensed or omitted. Management believes the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the periods presented herein. Our results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 may not be indicative of our future results. These condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and ~~should~~ should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. As a result of our new segment in 2010, the HTS Satellite segment, certain prior period items in these consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

All intercompany balances and transactions with subsidiaries and other consolidated entities have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in those estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2010-06 to improve disclosures about fair value measurements. ASU 2010-6 clarifies certain existing disclosures and requires new disclosure regarding significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 of fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfer. In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The amendments in ASU 2010-06 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and for interim periods within those fiscal periods. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on our disclosure about fair value measurements.

In June 2009 and December 2009, the FASB amended ASC 810 changing certain consolidation guidance and requiring improved financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities (“VIE”). The amendments provide guidance in determining when a reporting entity should include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interest and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements. The amendments to ASC 810 were effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The adoption of amendments to consolidation rules did not have any impact on our disclosures relating to our VIE activity and our financial statements.

Accounting Guidance Not Yet Effective

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14 to amend ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition.” The amendments in this update change the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. The amendments in ASU 2009-14 will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact these amendments will have on our financial statements when they become effective.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13 amending ASC 605 related to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Among other things, ASU 2009-13 provides guidance for entities in determining the accounting for multiple deliverable arrangements and establishes a hierarchy for determining the amount of revenue to allocate to the various deliverables. We are currently evaluating the impact ASU 2009-13 will have on our financial statements when it becomes effective on January 1, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 2: Marketable Securities

The amortized cost basis and estimated fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	Cost Basis		Gross Unrealized ~~Gains~~Gain		Estimated Fair Value
June 30, 2010:
September 30, 2010:
U.S. government bonds and treasury bills	$	155,~~023~~000	$	71	$	155,~~030~~001
Other debt securities		9,~~990~~999		-		9,~~990~~999
Total available-for-sale securities	$	2514,~~013~~999	$	71	$	2515,~~020~~000
December 31, 2009:
U.S. government bonds and treasury bills	$	15,105	$	4	$	15,109
Other debt securities		16,012		5		16,017
Total available-for-sale securities	$	31,117	$	9	$	31,126

Our investments in U.S. government bonds and treasury bills have AAA and Aaa ratings from Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) and Moody’s, respectively. The investments in Other debt securities have A-1/A-1+ and P-1 ratings from S&P and Moody’s, respectively.

Note 3: Receivables, Net

Receivables, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
			September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
Trade receivables	$	~~143,232~~	$	148,981	$	~~154,037~~	$	154,037
Contracts in process		~~23,810~~		20,234		~~16,952~~		16,952
Other receivables		~~3,220~~		3,614		~~3,902~~		3,902
Total receivables		~~170,262~~		172,829		~~174,891~~		174,891
Allowance for doubtful accounts		~~(11,410~~	)	(10,957	)	~~(12,085~~	)	(12,085	)
Total receivables, net	$	~~158,852~~	$	161,872	$	~~162,806~~	$	162,806

Trade receivables included $7.97 million and $8.7 million of amounts due from related parties as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Advances and progress billings offset against contracts in process amounted to $1.3.0 million and $0.3 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Note 4: Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
			September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
Production materials and supplies	$	~~7,502~~	$	7,293	$	~~7,896~~	$	7,896
Work in process		~~18,291~~		16,507		~~15,615~~		15,615
Finished goods		~~32,556~~		33,137		~~36,733~~		36,733
Total inventories	$	~~58,349~~	$	56,937	$	~~60,244~~	$	60,244

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market, principally using standard costs adjusted to reflect actual cost, based on variance analyses performed throughout the year. Inventories are adjusted to net realizable value using management’s best estimates of future use. In making its assessment of future use or recovery, management considers the aging and composition of inventory balances, the effects of technological and/or design changes, forecasted future product demand based on firm or near-firm customer orders and alternative means of disposition of excess or obsolete items.

Note 5: Property, Net

Property, net consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

		Estimated Useful Lives (years)		~~Estimated Useful Lives (years)~~	September 30, 2010	~~June 30, 2010~~			December 31, 2009	~~December 31, 2009~~
Land and improvements			10	10	$	$5,892	~~5,885~~		$	$5,885	~~5,885~~
Buildings and leasehold improvements			2 -30	~~2 - 30~~		34,340	~~33,524~~			32,867	~~32,867~~
Satellite related assets			15	15		380,394	~~380,394~~			380,394	~~380,394~~
Machinery and equipment			1 - 7	~~1 - 7~~		322,074	~~297,550~~			250,345	~~250,345~~
VSAT operating lease hardware			2 - 5	~~2 - 5~~		17,220	~~16,918~~			18,945	~~18,945~~
Furniture and fixtures			7	7		1,641	~~1,587~~			1,557	~~1,557~~
Construction in progress	- Jupiter	~~- Jupiter~~				196,655	~~130,242~~			66,555	~~66,555~~
	- Other	~~- Other~~				14,603	~~16,388~~			12,888	~~12,888~~
Total property						972,819	~~882,488~~			769,436	~~769,436~~
Accumulated depreciation						(244,459	~~(216,692~~)	)		(167,472	~~(167,472~~)	)
Total property, net					$	$728,360	~~665,796~~		$	$601,964	~~601,964~~

Satellite related assets primarily consist of SPACEWAY^TM 3 (“SPACEWAY 3”), a broadband satellite system with a unique architecture for broadband data communications. In April 2008, we placed SPACEWAY 3 into service and began to depreciate its related costs on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 15 years. Satellite related assets include the costs associated with the construction and launch of the satellite, insurance premiums for the satellite launch and the in-orbit testing period, interest incurred during the construction of the satellite, and other costs directly related to the satellite.

In June 2009, we entered into an agreement with Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (“SS/L”) under which SS/L will manufacture Jupiter, our next-generation, and geostationary high throughput ~~geostationary~~ satellite ~~(“Jupiter”)~~. Jupiter will employ a multi-spot beam, bent pipe Ka-band architecture and will provide additional capacity for the HughesNet service in North America. The construction of Jupiter began in July 2009 and we began to capitalize all direct costs associated with the construction and the launch of the satellite, including interest incurred during the construction of the satellite. WeJupiter ~~anticipate~~is ~~launching~~scheduled ~~Jupiter~~to be launched in the first half of 2012.

~~For~~We ~~the~~capitalized ~~three~~interest ~~and~~of ~~six months ended June 30, 2010, we capitalized~~ $23.79 million and $48.76 million, ~~respectively,~~for ofthe ~~interest~~three ~~related~~and tonine ~~the~~months ended ~~construction~~September 30, of2010, ~~Jupiter.~~respectively, ~~There~~and ~~was~~$0.4 nomillion ~~capitalized~~for ~~interest~~each ~~expense~~of ~~for~~ the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, related to the construction of Jupiter.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 6: Intangible Assets, Net

Intangible assets, net consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Estimated Useful Lives (years)	Cost Basis	~~Cost Basis~~		Accumulated Amortization	~~Accumulated Amortization~~			Net Basis	~~Net Basis~~
June 30, 2010:
September 30, 2010:
Backlog and customer relationships	8		$	9,786		$	(4,750	)		$	5,036
Customer relationships	8	$	9,786		$	(5,030	)		$	4,756
Patented technology and trademarks	8 -10		15,275	~~15,275~~		(8,610	~~(8,208~~)	)		6,665	~~7,067~~
Total intangible assets, net		$	$25,061	~~25,061~~	$	$(13,640	~~(12,958~~)	)	$	$11,421	~~12,103~~
December 31, 2009:
Backlog and customer relationships	4 - 8	$	$21,612	~~21,612~~	$	$(16,015	~~(16,015~~)	)	$	$5,597	~~5,597~~
Patented technology and trademarks	2 -10		15,745	~~15,745~~		(7,854	~~(7,854~~)	)		7,891	~~7,891~~
Total intangible assets, net		$	$37,357	~~37,357~~	$	$(23,869	~~(23,869~~)	)	$	$13,488	~~13,488~~

We amortize the recorded values of our intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010, weour ~~retired~~intangible assets excluded, in the aggregate, $12.3 million of ~~our~~fully amortized intangible assets. asFor ~~they~~the ~~were~~three ~~fully~~months ~~amortized.~~ended WeSeptember 30, ~~recorded~~2010 ~~amortization~~and ~~expense~~2009, ofwe recorded $0.7 million and $1.4 million, ~~for~~respectively, of amortization expense. For the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively,~~we ~~and~~recorded $12.41 million and $24.82 million, ~~for the six months ended June 30~~respectively, ~~2010~~of ~~and~~amortization ~~2009, respectively~~expense. Estimated future amortization expense as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):

	Amount
Remaining six months ending December 31, 2010	$	1,365
Remaining three months ending December 31, 2010	$	683
Year ending December 31,
2011		2,730
2012		2,730
2013		2,730
2014		1,237
2015		1,237
Thereafter		74
Total estimated future amortization expense	$	1211,~~103~~421

Note 7: Other Assets

Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Subscriber acquisition costs	$	2726,~~356~~328	$	29,884
Debt issuance costs		1312,~~240~~514		12,899
Other		25,~~253~~242		25,741
Total other assets	$	6564,~~849~~084	$	68,524

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 8: Debt

Short-term and current portion of long-term debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Interest Rates atJune 30, 2010	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
	Interest Rates atSeptember 30, 2010	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
VSAT hardware financing	8.00% - 15.00%	$	3,~~161~~165	$	~~3,158~~$	3,158
Revolving bank borrowings	8.~~25% - 8.~~75%		~~1,066~~438		~~1,547~~	1,547
Capital lease and other	65.0050% - 39.60%		2,~~534~~530		~~2,045~~	2,045
Total short-term and the current portion of long-term debt		$	6,~~761~~133	$	~~6,750~~$	6,750

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we had outstanding revolving bank borrowings of $10.14 million, which had a ~~weighted average~~ variable interest rate of 8.75%. The ~~borrowings~~borrowing ~~were~~was obtained by our ~~subsidiaries~~Indian insubsidiary ~~India and Europe~~ under its revolving ~~lines~~line of credit with ~~several~~a local ~~banks~~bank. There is no requirement for compensating balances for these borrowings. The total amount available for borrowing by our foreign subsidiaries under various revolving lines of credit was $45.87 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

Long-term debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Interest Rates atJune 30, 2010		June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	Interest Rates atSeptember 30, 2010				September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Senior Notes(1)	~~9.50%~~	9.50%	$	~~588,990~~	$	$589,573	~~587,874~~	$	587,874
Term Loan Facility	~~7.62%~~	7.62%		~~115,000~~		115,000	~~115,000~~		115,000
VSAT hardware financing	~~8.00% - 15.00%~~	8.00% - 15.00%		~~4,453~~		3,841	~~5,861~~		5,861
Capital lease and other	~~6.00% - 39.60%~~	5.50% - 39.60%		~~4,541~~		4,721	~~6,222~~		6,222
Total long-term debt			$	~~712,984~~	$	$713,135	~~714,957~~	$	714,957
(1) Includes 2006 Senior Notes and 2009 Senior Notes.

~~On March 16, 2010, we entered into a credit agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Barclays Capital to amend and restate our senior secured $50 million revolving credit facility~~ (~~the “Revolving Credit Facility”~~1)~~. Pursuant~~ toIncludes the terms of the agreement, among other changes, the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended to March 16, 2014, subject to an early maturity date of 91 days prior to March 16, 2014 in the event our 2009 and 2006 Senior Notes and our Term Loan Facility (as defined below) are not (i) repaid in full or (ii) refinanced with new debt (or amended) with maturities of no earlier than 91 days after March 16, 2014. The terms of the Revolving Credit Facility were amended to be: (i) in respect of the interest rate, at our option, the Alternative Borrowing Rate (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) plus 2.00% or the Adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) plus 3.00% and (ii) in respect of the participation fee for outstanding letters of credit, 3.00% per annum, in each case subject to downward adjustment based on our leverage ratio. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, ~~there~~Senior ~~were no borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility~~Notes. ~~As of June 30, 2010, the Revolving Credit Facility had total outstanding letters of credit of $5.3 million and an available borrowing capacity of $44.7 million.~~

InOn ~~May~~March ~~2009~~16, we2010, ~~along~~we entered into a credit agreement with ~~our~~JP ~~subsidiary,~~Morgan ~~HNS~~Chase ~~Finance~~Bank, ~~Corp~~N.,A. asand ~~co-issuer,~~Barclays ~~completed~~Capital ato ~~private~~amend ~~debt~~and ~~offering~~restate ofour senior secured $~~150.0~~50 million ofrevolving credit facility (the 9“Revolving Credit Facility”).~~50%~~ Pursuant ~~senior~~to ~~notes~~the ~~maturing~~terms onof ~~April~~the agreement, among other changes, the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended to March 1516, 2014, (subject to an early maturity date of 91 days prior to March 16, 2014 in the “event our 2009 and 2006 Senior Notes” and our Term Loan Facility (as defined below) are not (i) repaid in full or (ii) refinanced with new debt (or amended) with maturities of no earlier than 91 days after March 16, 2014. The ~~Interest~~terms onof the ~~2009~~Revolving ~~Senior~~Credit ~~Notes~~Facility iswere ~~accrued~~amended ~~from~~to ~~April~~be: (i) 15in respect of the interest rate, ~~2009~~at ~~and~~our isoption, ~~paid~~the ~~semi-annually~~Alternative Borrowing Rate (as defined in ~~arrears~~the onRevolving ~~April 15~~Credit Facility) plus 2.00% or the Adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) plus 3.00% and ~~October~~(ii) 15in respect of ~~each~~the ~~year~~participation fee for outstanding letters of credit, 3.00% per annum, in each case subject to downward ~~beginning~~adjustment based on ~~October~~our leverage ratio. 15For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, there was no borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~and~~the ~~December 31,~~Revolving ~~2009,~~Credit weFacility ~~recorded~~had ~~$3.0~~total ~~million~~outstanding letters of ~~accrued~~credit ~~interest~~of ~~payable~~$4.9 ~~related~~million toand ~~the~~an ~~2009~~available ~~Senior~~borrowing ~~Notes~~capacity of $45.1 million.

In ~~February 2007~~May 2009, we, ~~borrowed~~along ~~$115~~with ~~million~~our subsidiary, ~~from~~HNS aFinance ~~syndicate of banks (the “Term Loan Facility”)~~Corp., ~~which~~as ~~matures on April 15~~co-issuer, ~~2014.~~completed ~~The~~a ~~interest~~private ondebt ~~the~~offering ~~Term~~of ~~Loan~~$150.0 ~~Facility~~million isof ~~paid~~9.50% ~~quarterly~~senior atnotes ~~Adjusted~~maturing ~~LIBOR~~on ~~(as~~April 15, ~~defined~~2014 in (the ~~Term~~“2009 ~~Loan~~Senior ~~Facility~~Notes”) ~~plus 2~~.~~50% per~~ ~~annum.~~Interest Toon ~~mitigate~~ the ~~variable~~2009 ~~interest~~Senior ~~rate~~Notes ~~risk~~is ~~associated~~accrued ~~with the Term Loan Facility~~from April 15, ~~we entered~~2009 ~~into~~and ais ~~swap~~paid ~~agreement~~semi-annually toin ~~swap~~arrears ~~the~~on ~~Adjusted~~April 15 ~~LIBOR~~and ~~for~~October 15 ~~a fixed interest rate~~ of ~~5.12% per~~each ~~annum (the “Swap Agreement”). As a result~~year, ~~the~~beginning ~~Term~~on ~~Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62%~~October ~~per~~15, ~~annum~~2009. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, ~~interest~~we ~~accrued~~recorded ~~based~~$6.5 onmillion ~~the~~and ~~Swap~~$3.0 ~~Agreement~~million, respectively, ~~and~~of ~~the~~accrued ~~Term~~interest ~~Loan~~payable ~~Facility~~related ~~was~~to ~~$0.8~~the ~~million~~2009 Senior Notes.

In February 2007, we borrowed $115 million from a syndicate of banks (the “Term Loan Facility”), which matures on April 15, 2014. The interest on the Term Loan Facility is paid quarterly at Adjusted LIBOR (as defined in the Term Loan Facility) plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate the variable interest rate risk associated with the Term Loan Facility, we entered into a swap agreement to swap the Adjusted LIBOR for a fixed interest rate of 5.12% per annum (the “Swap Agreement”). As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62% per annum. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, interest accrued based on the Swap Agreement and the Term Loan Facility was $0.8 million.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In April 2006, we issued $450 million of 9.50% senior notes maturing on April 15, 2014 (the “2006 Senior Notes”). Interest on the 2006 Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we recorded $19.6 million and $8.9 million, respectively, of accrued interest payable related to the 2006 Senior Notes.

Although the terms and covenants with respect to the 2009 Senior Notes are substantially identical to the 2006 Senior Notes, the 2009 Senior Notes were issued under a separate indenture and do not vote together with the 2006 Senior Notes. Each of the indentures governing the 2006 Senior Notes and the 2009 Senior Notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”), the agreement governing the amended Revolving Credit Facility and the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility require us to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants: (i) in the case of the indentures, for so long as any Senior Notes are outstanding; (ii) in the case of the amended Revolving Credit Facility, so long as the amended Revolving Credit Facility is in effect; and (iii) in the case of the Term Loan Facility, for so long as the Term Loan Facility remains outstanding. Negative covenants contained in these agreements include limitations on our ability and/or certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness; issue redeemable stock and subsidiary preferred stock; incur liens; pay dividends or distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; make loans and investments; enter into agreements that restrict distributions from our subsidiaries; sell assets and capital stock of our subsidiaries; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person; and enter into new lines of business. In addition to these negative covenants, the amended Revolving Credit Facility, the indentures governing the Senior Notes and/or the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility contain affirmative covenants that require us to: (i) preserve our businesses and properties; (ii) maintain insurance over our assets; (iii) pay and discharge all material taxes when due; and (iv) furnish the lenders’ administrative agent our financial statements for each fiscal quarter and fiscal year, certificates from a financial officer certifying that no Event of Default or Default has occurred during the fiscal period being reported, litigation and other notices, compliance with laws, maintenance of records and other such customary covenants. Management believes that we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

In July 2006, we entered into a capital lease with 95 West Co., Inc. (“95 West Co.”) and its parent, Miraxis License Holdings, LLC (“MLH”), which are our related parties as discussed in Note 14—Transactions with Related Parties. Pursuant to the capital lease agreement, 95 West Co. and MLH agreed to provide a series of coordination agreements allowing us to operate SPACEWAY 3 at the 95° west longitude orbital slot where 95 West Co. and MLH have higher priority rights. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the remaining debt balance under the capital lease was $4.9 million, which was included in “Capital lease and other” in the short-term and long-term debt tables above. The remaining payments under the capital lease are subject to conditions in the agreement including our ability to operate SPACEWAY 3 and are $1.0 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2011 through 2016.

Note 9: Financial Instruments

Interest Rate Swap

The interest on the Term Loan Facility was at Adjusted LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate the variable interest rate risk associated with the Term Loan Facility, we entered into the Swap Agreement to swap the Adjusted LIBOR for a fixed interest rate of 5.12% per annum. As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62% per annum. We account for the Swap Agreement as a cash flow hedge in accordance with ASC 815-30 “Derivatives and Hedging —Cash Flow Hedges.” Accordingly, in connection with the fair market valuation of the interest rate swap, we recorded a net unrealized loss of $12.70 million and $24.76 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively, in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” (“AOCL”). For the three and anine ~~net~~months ~~unrealized~~ended ~~gain~~September 30, of2009, we recognized $21.84 million of net unrealized loss and $75.39 million of net unrealized gain, respectively, ~~for the comparable periods~~ in ~~2009~~AOCL ~~in accumulated other comprehensive loss~~ associated with the fair market valuation of the interest rate swap. The remaining net interest payments based on the Swap Agreement and the Term Loan Facility are paid quarterly and estimated to be approximately $42.42 million for the ~~six~~three months ending December 31, 2010, $8.8 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2011 through 2013 and $3.3 million for the year ending December 31, 2014. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $2.~~2 million and $2.~~3 million, ~~respectively,~~ of interest expense on the Term Loan Facility. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $46.47 million and $46.58 million, respectively, of interest expense on the Term Loan Facility.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 10: Fair Value

Under ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, and the principal market is defined as the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability. If there is no principal market, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received for the asset or minimizes the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value should be based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Where available, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are used (i.e. Black-Scholes, a barrier option model or a binomial model). ASC 820 established the following three levels used to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value measurements:

Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.

In determining fair value, we use various valuation approaches, including market, income and/or cost approaches. Other valuation techniques involve significant management judgment. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, net, ~~accounts~~ accounts payable, and debt, except for the Senior Notes as described below, approximated their respective fair values.

Our ~~Senior~~ Senior Notes were categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy as we utilized pricing for recent market transactions for identical notes because of their short-term maturities.

Our Term Loan Facility originally had a variable interest rate based on observable interest rates plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate the variable interest rate risk, we entered into the Swap Agreement to swap the Adjusted LIBOR for a fixed interest rate of 5.12% per annum. As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62% per annum. We adjust the value of the interest rate swap on a quarterly basis. The fair value of the interest rate swap was categorized as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

			June 30, 2010
			September 30, 2010
	Level	Included In	Carrying Value			Fair Value
Marketable securities	1	Marketable securities	$	2515,~~020~~000		$	2515,~~020~~000
2006 Senior Notes	1	Long-term debt	$	450,000		$	~~456~~468,~~750~~000
2009 Senior Notes	1	Long-term debt	$	~~138~~139,~~990~~573	(1)	$	~~151~~155,~~718~~250
Interest rate swap on the Term Loan Facility	2	Other long-term liabilities	$	1315,~~173~~145		$	1315,~~173~~145

(1) Amount represents the face value of $150.0 million, net the remaining original issue discount of $1110.04 million.

Note 11: Income Taxes

We are a limited liability company and have elected to be treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. As such, our U.S. federal and state income taxes (in the states which tax limited liability companies as partnerships) are the direct responsibility of our members. Our Parent holds 100% of our Class A membership interests; and therefore, our activity is

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note ~~reported~~11: Income onTaxes our Parent’s income tax returns. Under the terms of the Contribution and Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated December 3, 2004, as amended, among the Company, LightSquared, Inc. (formerly SkyTerra Communications, Inc.), the DIRECTV Group, Inc. (“DIRECTV”) and DTV Network Systems, Inc. (“DTV Networks”), DIRECTV retained the domestic tax benefits of the Company occurring prior to April 23, 2005 and has responsibility for all of the pre-closing domestic and foreign income tax liabilities of DTV Networks. We have recorded a liability in the balance sheet for the estimated amount we may be required to pay to DIRECTV resulting from prepaid taxes exceeding tax liabilities as of April 22, 2005.

~~Our~~We ~~income~~are ~~tax~~a ~~expense~~limited ~~represents~~liability ~~taxes~~company and have elected to be treated as a ~~associated~~partnership ~~with~~for income tax purposes. As such, our ~~foreign~~U.S. ~~subsidiaries~~federal and state income taxes (in the states ~~that~~which ~~recognize~~tax limited liability companies as ~~taxable~~partnerships) ~~corporations.~~are ~~For~~ the ~~three~~direct ~~and~~responsibility ~~six~~of ~~months~~our ~~ended~~members. ~~June 30,~~Our ~~2010,~~Parent weholds ~~recorded~~100% ~~$1.6~~of ~~million~~our ~~and~~Class A membership ~~$2.8~~interests; ~~million~~and therefore, ~~respectively,~~ ofour activity is reported on our Parent’s income tax ~~expense~~returns. ~~For~~Under the ~~three~~terms of the Contribution and ~~six~~Membership ~~months~~Interest ~~ended~~Purchase ~~June~~Agreement dated December 303, ~~2009~~2004, weas ~~recorded~~amended, aamong ~~net~~the ~~income~~Company, LightSquared, ~~tax~~Inc. ~~expense~~(formerly ofSkyTerra $0Communications, Inc.5), ~~million~~the ~~and~~DIRECTV aGroup, ~~net~~Inc. ~~income~~(“DIRECTV”) ~~tax~~and ~~benefit~~DTV ofNetwork $0Systems, Inc.2 ~~million~~(“DTV Networks”), ~~respectively.~~DIRECTV ~~The~~retained ~~net~~the ~~income~~domestic tax ~~benefit~~benefits isof ~~attributable~~ the Company occurring prior to April 23, ~~our~~2005 ~~Indian~~and ~~subsidiary~~has asresponsibility afor ~~result~~all of ~~being~~the ~~engaged~~pre-closing indomestic ~~telecommunications~~and ~~infrastructure~~foreign ~~development~~income tax liabilities of DTV Networks. ~~Indian~~We ~~tax~~have ~~law~~recorded ~~provides~~a liability in the balance sheet for athe ~~deduction~~estimated ofamount ~~100%~~we ofmay ~~profits~~be ~~and~~required ~~gains~~to ~~derived~~pay to DIRECTV resulting from ~~qualifying~~prepaid ~~infrastructure~~taxes ~~businesses~~exceeding ~~for~~tax ~~ten~~liabilities ~~consecutive assessment~~as ~~years~~of April 22, 2005.

~~Certain~~Our ofincome tax expense represents taxes associated with our foreign subsidiaries ~~are~~and ~~expected~~state totaxes ~~utilize~~in athe ~~portion~~states ofthat ~~their~~recognize ~~net~~limited ~~operating~~liability ~~loss~~companies ~~carry-forwards during~~as taxable corporations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded $1.6 ~~Several~~million and $4.3 million, respectively, of ~~these~~net ~~subsidiaries~~income ~~have~~tax ~~not~~expense. ~~met~~For the ~~more-likely-than-not~~three ~~criteria~~and ofnine ~~ASC~~months ~~740~~ended ~~“Income~~September 30, ~~Taxes”~~2009, we recorded a net income tax expense of $1.0 million and ~~therefore~~$0.8 ~~maintain~~million, arespectively. ~~full~~The ~~valuation~~net ~~allowance~~income ontax ~~their~~expense ~~deferred~~was partially offset by an income tax ~~assets~~benefit attributable to our Indian subsidiary as a result of ~~June 30,~~being ~~2010~~engaged in telecommunications infrastructure development. ~~Any~~Indian ~~benefit realized~~tax ~~from~~law ~~the~~provides ~~reversal~~for a deduction of ~~valuation~~100% ~~allowance~~of ~~will~~profits beand ~~recorded~~gains asderived afrom ~~reduction~~qualifying toinfrastructure ~~income~~businesses for ~~tax~~ten ~~expense~~consecutive assessment years.

~~For~~Certain ~~the~~of ~~six~~our ~~months ended~~subsidiaries ~~June 30,~~are ~~2010,~~expected weto ~~did~~utilize ~~not~~a ~~identify~~portion ~~any~~of ~~significant~~their ~~uncertain~~net ~~tax~~operating loss ~~positions~~carry-forwards during 2010. WeSeveral doof ~~not~~these ~~believe~~subsidiaries ~~that~~have not met the ~~unrecognized~~more-likely-than-not ~~tax~~criteria ~~benefits~~of ~~will~~ASC ~~significantly~~740 ~~increase~~“Income orTaxes” ~~decrease~~and ~~within~~therefore ~~the~~maintain ~~next~~a ~~twelve~~full ~~months.~~valuation ~~Following~~allowance ison atheir ~~description~~deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2010. Any benefit realized from the ~~tax years~~reversal ~~that~~of ~~remain~~valuation ~~subject~~allowance towill ~~examination~~be byrecorded ~~major~~as a reduction to income tax ~~jurisdictions:~~expense.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we did not identify any significant uncertain tax positions. We do not believe that the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Following is a description of the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions:


United States - Federal		2007 and forward
United States - Various States		2005 and forward
United Kingdom		2005 and forward
Germany		2004 and forward
Italy		2005 and forward
India		1995 and forward
Mexico		2000 and forward
Brazil		2003 and forward

Note 12: Employee Share-Based Payments

HCI’s 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan

In January 2006, HCI’s Board of Directors approved the HCI 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted common stock, restricted stock units, stock options, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based awards, as well as cash bonuses and long-term cash awards to directors, officers, employees, advisors and consultants of HCI and its subsidiaries who are selected by HCI’s Compensation Committee for participation in the Plan. We recorded compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards, issued to our employees, and restricted stock units, issued only to our international employees, after adjustment for forfeitures, of $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $1.8 million and $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, we had $0.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average life of 1.04 years.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 12: Employee Share-Based Payments

HCI’s 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan

In January 2006, HCI’s Board of Directors approved the HCI 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted common stock, restricted stock units, stock options, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based awards, as well as cash bonuses and long-term cash awards to directors, officers, employees, advisors and consultants of HCI and its subsidiaries who are selected by HCI’s Compensation Committee for participation in the Plan. We recorded compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards, issued to our employees, and restricted stock units, issued only to our international employees, after adjustment for forfeitures, of $0.6 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $1.2 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. As of June 30, 2010, we had $1.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average life of 1.02 years.

Summaries of non-vested restricted stock awards, excluding awards issued to HCI’s directors, and restricted stock units are as follows:

Restricted Stock Awards

	Shares			~~Weighted-AverageGrant-DateFair Value~~	Weighted-AverageGrant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2009	~~72,360~~	72,360		$	~~47.58~~$	47.58
Forfeited	~~(2,000~~	)(2,625	)	$	~~46.97~~$	46.50
Vested	~~(4,550~~	)(50,409	)	$	~~49.39~~$	46.81
Non-vested at June 30, 2010	65,810			$	47.47
Non-vested at September 30, 2010		19,326			$	49.72

Restricted Stock Units

As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had 8,675 non-vested restricted stock units with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $28.73.


	Shares			Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2009		8,675		$	28.73
Vested		(1,500	)	$	46.64

Non-vested at September 30, 2010		7,175		$	24.99

Stock Option Program

On April 24, 2008, HCI’s Compensation Committee made stock option awards under the Plan (the “Stock Option Program”), which consisted of the issuance of non-qualified stock options to employees of HCI and its subsidiaries. The grant and exercise price of the stock options is the closing price of HCI’s common stock on the date of the grant. Any options forfeited or cancelled before exercise will be deposited back into the Option Pool and will become available for award under the Stock Option Program. Each grant has a 10 year life and vests 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model.

On March 19, 2009, HCI offered eligible participants in the Stock Option Program the opportunity to exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) all or a portion of their eligible outstanding stock options for new stock options, on a one-for-one basis, through an exchange offer, which expired on April 16, 2009. Each new option (the “New Options”) has an exercise price of $14.47, which was the closing price of HCI’s common stock on April 15, 2009, and a new vesting schedule to reflect the new grant date of April 16, 2009.

As a result of the Exchange Offer, which was completed on April 16, 2009, 546,900 outstanding stock options (representing 100% participation) were exchanged, and the estimated fair value of the New Options of $2.3 million was computed using a Black-Scholes option valuation model based on the new grant date. The compensation expense related to the New Options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period beginning on the date of grant.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The key assumptions for the option awards for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~ 2010 are as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
		Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2010
Volatility	45.90%
Volatility range		45.33% - 45.90%
Expected term	5 years
Weighted-average volatility		45.74%
Risk-free interest rate	2.59%
Expected term		5 years
Risk-free interest rate range		1.41% - 2.59%
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate		2.29%
A summary of option activity under the Stock Option Program is presented below:

A summary of option activity under the Stock Option Program is presented below:



	Option Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value⁽¹⁾
Outstanding at December 31, 2009		648,050		$	16.77		9.37	$	6,326
Granted		7,000		$	26.99
Forfeited or expired		(13,850	)	$	15.54

Outstanding at September 30, 2010		641,200		$	16.90		8.63	$	6,837

Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2010		577,080		$	16.90		8.63	$	6,153

Exercisable at September 30, 2010		-		$	-


(1) In thousands.

	Option Shares		Weighted- AverageExercise Price		Weighted AverageRemainingContractual Life	Aggregate IntrinsicValue(1)
Outstanding at December 31, 2009	648,050		$	16.77	9.37	$	6,326
Granted	5,000		$	27.96	9.76	$	-
Forfeited or expired	(10,050	)	$	15.21
Outstanding at June 30, 2010	643,000		$	16.88	8.88	$	5,299
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2010	578,700		$	16.88	8.88	$	4,769
Exercisable at June 30, 2010	-		$	-
(1) In thousands.

The compensation expense related to stock option awards to our employees is recognized on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period beginning on the date of grant. We recorded compensation expense of $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $3.0 million and $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, we had $7.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense for non-vested stock options, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 2.61 years.

The compensation expense related to stock option awards to our employees is recognized on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period beginning on the date of grant. We recorded compensation expense of $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $2.0 million and $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, we had $8.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense for non-vested stock options, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 2.86 years.

Bonus Unit Plan

In July 2005, we adopted an incentive bonus unit plan (the “Bonus Unit Plan”), pursuant to which bonus units were granted to certain employees of the Company. The bonus units provide for time vesting over five years and are subject to a participant’s continued employment with the Company. Pursuant to the Bonus Unit Plan, if participants in the Bonus Unit Plan are employed by the Company at the time of the predetermined exchange dates, they are entitled to exchange their vested bonus units for shares of HCI’s common stock. The number of HCI’s common stock shares to be issued upon each exchange is calculated based upon the fair market value of the vested bonus unit divided by the average closing trading price of HCI’s common stock for the 20 business days immediately preceding the date of the exchange. We recognized compensation expense of $0.2 million for each of the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 and $0.46 million for each of the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 related to the Bonus Unit Plan. AsOn of July 15, 2010, ~~approximately~~the 2.1 million vested bonus units vested ~~and~~ were exchanged for approximately 207,000 shares (net of income tax withholding) of HCI’s common stock pursuant to the Bonus Unit Plan. The remaining 300,000 bonus units will vest on July 15, 2011.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes changes in bonus units under the Bonus Unit Plan:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			~~2009~~	2009		~~2010~~		2010	~~2009~~		2009
Non-vested at December 31, 2009	2,439,500			2,500,000			2,453,250			2,500,000
Non-vested beginning balance		2,439,500				2,500,000				2,453,250			2,500,000
Forfeited	-			-			(13,750	)		-
Converted to HCI common shares		(2,139,500	)			-				(2,139,500	)		-
Non-vested at June 30, 2010	2,439,500			2,500,000			2,439,500			2,500,000
Forfeited		-				-				(13,750	)		-
Non-vested ending balance		300,000				2,500,000				300,000			2,500,000
Class B Membership Interests

Class B ~~Membership~~membership ~~Interests~~interests in the Company were issued to certain members of our senior management, two of our former senior management and a member of our Board of Managers and HCI’s Board of Directors. The Class B membership interests are subject to certain vesting requirements, with 50% of the Class B membership interests subject to time vesting over five years and the other 50% vesting based upon certain performance criteria. At the holders’ election, vested Class B membership interests may be exchanged for HCI’s common stock. The number of shares of HCI’s common stock to be issued upon such exchange is based upon the fair market value of such vested Class B membership interest tendered for exchange divided by the average closing trading price of HCI’s common stock for the 20 business days immediately preceding the date of such exchange. As of September 30, 2010, 3,259 of the 3,280 outstanding Class B membership interests were vested. If the total outstanding Class B membership interests were to convert into HCI’s common stock as of September 30, 2010, they could be exchanged for approximately 584,000 shares of HCI’s common stock. On September 25, 2009, HCI registered 75,000 shares of its common stock with the SEC on Form S-8 to be issued, from time to time, upon the exchange of the Class B membership interests. Pursuant to ASC 718 “Compensation—Stock Compensation,” the Company determined that the Class B membership interests had nominal value at the date of grant, and, accordingly, minimal compensation expense was recorded for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. A summary of Class B membership interests activities is as follows:

Class B membership interests in the Company were issued to certain members of our senior management, two of our former senior management and a member of our Board of Managers and HCI’s Board of Directors. The Class B membership interests are subject to certain vesting requirements, with 50% of the Class B membership interests subject to time vesting over five years and the other 50% vesting based upon certain performance criteria. At the holders’ election, vested Class B membership interests may be exchanged for HCI’s common stock. The number of shares of HCI’s common stock to be issued upon such exchange is based upon the fair market value of such vested Class B membership interest tendered for exchange divided by the average closing trading price of HCI’s common stock for the 20 business days immediately preceding the date of such exchange. As of June 30, 2010, 3,247 of the 3,280 outstanding Class B membership interests were vested. If the total outstanding Class B membership interests were to convert into HCI’s common stock as of June 30, 2010, they could be exchanged for approximately 565,000 shares of HCI’s common stock. On September 25, 2009, HCI registered 75,000 shares of its common stock with the SEC on Form S-8 to be issued, from time to time, upon the exchange of the Class B membership interests.



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010			2009
Outstanding beginning balance		3,280		3,656		3,330			3,656
Converted to HCI common shares		-		-		(50	)		-

Outstanding ending balance		3,280		3,656		3,280			3,656

Pursuant to ASC 718 “Compensation—Stock Compensation,” the Company determined that the Class B membership interests had nominal value at the date of grant, and, accordingly, minimal compensation expense was recorded for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. A summary of Class B membership interests activities is as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009	2010		2009
Outstanding beginning balance	3,330		3,656	3,330		3,656
Converted to HCI common shares	(50	)	-	(50	)	-
Outstanding ending balance	3,280		3,656	3,280		3,656

Note 13: Long-Term Cash Incentive Retention Program

In 2005, the Company established a one-time employee retention program (“Retention Program”), which was designed to retain certain employees chosen by its senior management. As a result of the Company successfully attaining 100% of its earnings goal for 2008, as defined in the Retention Program, the Company paid an aggregate of $14.7 million to eligible participants under the Retention Program in 2009, of which $13.2 million was accrued as of December 31, 2008. The Company has no further obligation associated with the Retention Program.

Note 14: Transactions with Related Parties

In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into transactions with related parties to purchase and/or sell telecommunications services, equipment, and inventory. Related parties include all entities that are related to Apollo Management, L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Apollo”), our Parent’s controlling stockholder.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Hughes Telematics, Inc.

In July 2006, we granted a limited license to HTI allowing HTI to use the HUGHES trademark. The license is limited in that HTI may use the HUGHES trademark only in connection with its business of automotive telematics and only in combination with the TELEMATICS name. As partial consideration for the license, the agreement provides that we will be HTI’s preferred engineering services provider. The license is royalty-free, except that HTI has agreed to pay a royalty to us in the event HTI no longer has a commercial or affiliated relationship with us.

In October 2007, we entered into an agreement with HTI and a customer of HTI, whereby we agreed to assume the rights and performance obligations of HTI in the event that HTI fails to perform its obligations due to a fundamental cause such as bankruptcy or the cessation of its telematics business. In connection with that agreement, the Company and HTI have entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which HTI has agreed to take certain actions to enable us to assume HTI’s obligations in the event that such action is required. However, as a result of the Merger, as defined and described below, our obligations to HTI and its customer expired when HTI became a public company in March 2009 with an initial market capitalization value greater than $300.0 million. In January 2008, we entered into an agreement with HTI for the development of an automotive telematics system for HTI, comprising the telematics system hub and the Telematics Control Unit (“TCU”), which will serve as the user appliance in the telematics system.

In ~~January~~March ~~2008~~2009, weHCI ~~entered~~exchanged ~~into~~$13.0 anmillion ~~agreement~~of ~~with~~ HTI receivables for ~~the~~HTI ~~development~~convertible preferred stock (“HTI Preferred Stock”) as part of ana ~~automotive~~$50.0 ~~telematics~~million ~~system~~private ~~for~~placement of HTI, ~~comprising~~Preferred ~~the~~Stock. In ~~telematics~~connection ~~system~~with ~~hub~~the ~~and~~merger ~~the~~of ~~Telematics~~HTI ~~Control~~with ~~Unit~~Polaris Acquisition Corp. (the “~~TCU~~Merger”), which ~~will~~occurred ~~serve~~on asMarch 31, ~~the~~2009, ~~user~~HTI ~~appliance~~became ina ~~the~~publicly ~~telematics~~traded ~~system~~company and HCI’s HTI Preferred Stock was converted into approximately 3.3 million ~~The~~shares ~~agreement~~of ~~also~~HTI ~~provided~~common ~~that~~stock (“HTI Shares”), of which 1.3 million shares and 2.0 million shares are referred to as Non-escrowed shares and Escrowed shares, respectively. The Escrowed shares are subject to certain restrictions ~~specified~~and/or ~~performance~~earn-out ~~conditions,~~provisions wepursuant ~~will~~to ~~serve~~the asMerger agreement. If the ~~exclusive~~ ~~manufacturer~~full ~~and~~earn-out ~~supplier~~is ofachieved, ~~TCU~~HCI’s ~~for~~investment could represent approximately 3.8% of HTI’s outstanding common stock.

In ~~March~~August 2009, ~~HCI~~HTI ~~exchanged~~terminated ~~$13.0~~substantially ~~million~~all of ~~HTI~~the ~~receivables~~development ~~for HTI~~engineering ~~convertible~~and ~~preferred~~manufacturing ~~stock~~services ~~(“HTI~~with ~~Preferred~~us ~~Stock”)~~ as ~~part~~a result of athe bankruptcy ~~$50.0~~filing ~~million~~of ~~private~~one ~~placement~~ of HTI’s ~~Preferred Stock~~customers. InOn ~~connection~~December 18, ~~with~~2009, the ~~merger~~Company ofentered ~~HTI~~into ~~with~~a ~~Polaris~~promissory ~~Acquisition~~note ~~Corp.~~with ~~(the~~HTI (“~~Merger~~Promissory Note”), ~~which~~for ~~occurred~~$8.3 ~~on March 31,~~million ~~2009,~~of ~~HTI~~account ~~became~~receivables athat ~~publicly traded company and HCI’s~~ HTI ~~Preferred~~owed ~~Stock~~to ~~was~~the ~~converted~~Company. ~~into~~The ~~HTI~~Promissory ~~common~~Note has ~~stock~~a ~~(“HTI~~maturity ~~Shares”).~~date ~~There~~of ~~are~~December 31, ~~certain~~2010 ~~restrictions~~ and~~/or~~ ~~earn-out~~an ~~provisions~~interest ~~applicable~~rate toof ~~the~~12% per ~~HTI~~annum. ~~Shares pursuant~~As toof ~~the~~September 30, ~~Merger~~2010, ~~agreement. If~~ the ~~full~~remaining ~~earn-out~~Promissory ~~is achieved~~Note, ~~HCI’s~~including ~~investment~~accrued ~~could~~interest, ~~represent~~had ~~approximately~~a ~~3.8%~~balance of ~~HTI’s~~$7.5 ~~outstanding common stock~~million.

InHTI ~~August~~is ~~2009,~~controlled ~~HTI~~by ~~terminated~~an ~~substantially~~affiliate ~~all~~ of ~~the~~Apollo. ~~development~~Jeffrey ~~engineering~~A. ~~and~~Leddy, ~~manufacturing services with us as~~ a ~~result~~member of ~~the bankruptcy~~our ~~filing~~Board of ~~one~~Managers ofand ~~HTI~~HCI’s ~~customers.~~Board Onof ~~December 18~~Directors, ~~2009,~~ is the ~~Company~~CEO ~~entered~~and ~~into~~ a ~~promissory~~director ~~note~~of ~~with~~ HTI ~~(“Promissory~~and ~~Note”)~~owns ~~for~~less ~~$8.3~~than ~~million~~2% of ~~account~~HTI’s ~~receivables~~equity ~~that~~as ~~HTI~~of ~~owed~~September 30, to2010. ~~the~~In ~~Company.~~addition, ~~The~~Andrew ~~Promissory~~Africk ~~Note has~~and aAaron ~~maturity~~Stone, ~~date~~members of ~~December 31,~~our ~~2010~~Board of Managers and anHCI’s ~~interest~~Board ~~rate~~of Directors, are directors of ~~12% per~~HTI ~~annum~~and partners of Apollo.

HTI is controlled by an affiliate of Apollo. Jeffrey A. Leddy, a member of our Board of Managers and HCI’s Board of Directors, is the CEO and a director of HTI and owns less than 2% of HTI’s equity as of June 30, 2010. In addition, Andrew Africk and Aaron Stone, members of our Board of Managers and HCI’s Board of Directors, are directors of HTI and partners of Apollo.

Hughes Systique Corporation (“Hughes Systique”)

We have contracted with Hughes Systique, an entity consolidated with our Parent, for software development services. The founders of Hughes Systique include Pradman Kaul, our and HCI’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President, and certain former employees of the Company, including Pradeep Kaul, who is the CEO and President of Hughes Systique, our former Executive Vice President and the brother of our CEO and President. HCI acquired an equity investment in Hughes Systique Series A Preferred shares of $3.0 million and $1.5 million in October 2005 and January 2008, respectively. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010, on an undiluted basis, HCI owned approximately 45.23% of Hughes Systique’s outstanding shares, and our CEO and President and his brother, in the aggregate, owned approximately 25.61% of Hughes Systique’s outstanding shares. In addition, our CEO and President and Jeffrey A. Leddy, a member of our Board of Managers and HCI’s Board of Directors, serve on the board of directors of Hughes Systique.

Hughes Communications, Inc.

We have a management and advisory services agreement with HCI, our Parent, pursuant to which HCI agrees to provide us, through its officers and employees, general support, advisory, and consulting services in relation to our business. Pursuant to the agreement, we reimburse HCI for its out of pocket costs and expenses incurred in connection with the services, including an amount equal to 98% of the compensation of certain HCI executives plus a 2% service fee.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Pursuant to the agreement, we reimburse HCI for its out of pocket costs and expenses incurred in connection with the services, including an amount equal to 98% of the compensation of certain HCI executives plus a 2% service fee.

Agreement with 95 West Co., Inc.

In July 2006, we entered into an agreement with 95 West Co. and its parent, MLH, pursuant to which 95 West Co. and MLH agreed to provide a series of coordination agreements which allow us to operate SPACEWAY 3 at an orbital position where such parties have higher-priority rights. Jeffrey A. Leddy, a member of our Board of Managers and HCI’s Board of Directors, is the managing director of 95 West Co. and MLH and also owns a small interest in each. Andrew Africk, another member of our Board of Managers and HCI’s Board of Directors, is also a director of MLH. As part of the agreement, we agreed to pay $9.3 million, in annual installments of $0.3 million in 2006, $0.75 million in each year between 2007 and 2010 and $1.0 million in each year between 2011 and 2016 for the use of the orbital position, subject to conditions in the agreement including our ability to operate SPACEWAY 3. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the remaining debt balance under the capital lease was $4.9 million, which was included in “Capital lease and other” in the short-term and long-term debt tables included in Note 8—Debt.

Smart & Final, Inc.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, Apollo owned, directly or indirectly, 95% of Smart & Final, Inc. (“Smart & Final”). We provide broadband products and services to Smart & Final.

CKE Restaurants, Inc.

On July 12, 2010, an affiliate of Apollo acquired CKE Restaurants, Inc. (“CKE”). As a result, CKE indirectly became our related party as of that date. We provide broadband products and services to CKE.

Other

Certain members of our Board of Managers and officers serve on the boards of directors of some of our affiliates. In some cases, such members and officers have received stock-based compensation from such affiliates for their service. In those cases, the amount of stock-based compensation received by the directors and officers is comparable to stock-based compensation awarded to other non-executive members of the affiliates’ boards of directors.

Related Party Transactions

Sales and purchase transactions with related parties are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Sales:
HTI	$	~~200~~-	$	7,~~660~~567	$	501	$	1422,~~728~~295
Smart & Final		122		114		245		266
Others		208		129		453		395
Total sales	$	~~322~~208	$	7,~~774~~696	$	~~746~~954	$	1422,~~994~~690
Purchases:
Hughes Systique	$	2,~~575~~514	$	2,~~637~~688	$	57,~~030~~544	$	47,~~881~~569
HCI		2,~~475~~295		2,~~314~~212		47,~~958~~253		46,~~509~~721
Total purchases	$	54,~~050~~809	$	4,~~951~~900	$	914,~~988~~797	$	914,~~390~~290

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Assets and liabilities resulting from transactions with related parties are as follows (in thousands):

	June 30,2010		December 31,2009
	September 30,2010			December 31,2009
Due from related parties:
HTI	$	7,~~844~~459	$	~~8,652~~$	8,652
Smart & Final		50		52
Others		226			52
Total due from related parties	$	7,~~894~~685	$	~~8,704~~$	8,704
Due to related parties:
Hughes Systique	$	1,~~767~~768	$	~~1,643~~$	1,643
HCI		1,~~678~~270		~~2,610~~	2,610
Total due to related parties	$	3,~~445~~038	$	~~4,253~~$	4,253

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 15: Segment Data

Set forth below is selected financial information for our operating segments (in thousands). There were no intersegment transactions.

	NorthAmericaBroadband			InternationalBroadband		TelecomSystems		HTSSatellite~~(1)~~			Corporate		Consolidated(2)
As of or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
As of or For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Revenues	$	~~178~~190,~~024~~544		$	4751,~~853~~778	$	2522,~~456~~393	$	-		$	-	$	~~251~~264,~~333~~715
Operating income (loss)	$	1221,~~821~~100		$	2,~~549~~658	$	43,663	$	(~~928~~991	)	$	-	$	1926,~~105~~430
Depreciation and amortization	$	2728,~~141~~500		$	3,~~631~~794	$	1,~~043~~049	$	-		$	-	$	3133,~~815~~343
Assets	$	~~623~~622,~~819~~031		$	~~172~~177,~~296~~019	$	4541,~~976~~133	$	~~133~~202,~~284~~674		$	~~187~~182,~~208~~278	$	1,~~162~~225,~~583~~135
Capital expenditures	$	20,~~219~~845		$	21,~~484~~599	$	5058	$	3541,~~629~~852		$	21,~~256~~640	$	6065,~~638~~994
As of or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
As of or For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Revenues	$	~~175~~174,~~242~~123		$	5047,~~520~~521	$	2928,~~344~~825	$	-		$	-	$	~~255~~250,~~106~~469
Operating income (loss)(2)	$	(36,770	)	$	5,105	$	2,611	$	-		$	-	$	(29,054	)
Operating income	$	10,629		$	3,616	$	2,642	$	-		$	-	$	16,887
Depreciation and amortization	$	2022,~~237~~179		$	3,~~008~~419	$	~~974~~1,111	$	-		$	-	$	2426,~~219~~709
Assets	$	~~642~~641,~~672~~015		$	~~177~~184,~~772~~348	$	6148,~~678~~178	$	-41,418		$	~~279~~286,~~959~~813	$	1,~~162~~201,~~081~~772
Capital expenditures	$	2122,~~487~~329		$	61,~~589~~923	$	~~361~~233	$	-16,282		$	12,~~605~~443	$	3043,~~042~~210
As of or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
As of or For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Revenues	$	~~352~~542,~~019~~563		$	91143,~~309~~087	$	5072,~~148~~541	$	-		$	-	$	~~493~~758,~~476~~191
Operating income (loss)	$	2243,~~437~~537		$	14,~~393~~051	$	812,~~371~~034	$	(12,~~786~~777	)	$	-	$	3056,~~415~~845
Depreciation and amortization	$	5281,~~660~~160		$	710,~~057~~851	$	23,~~067~~116	$	-		$	-	$	6195,~~784~~127
Assets	$	~~623~~622,~~819~~031		$	~~172~~177,~~296~~019	$	4541,~~976~~133	$	~~133~~202,~~284~~674		$	~~187~~182,~~208~~278	$	1,~~162~~225,~~583~~135
Capital expenditures	$	4667,~~357~~202		$	68,~~671~~270	$	~~203~~261	$	68110,~~396~~248		$	57,~~845~~485	$	~~127~~193,~~472~~466
As of or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
As of or For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Revenues	$	~~340~~514,~~850~~973		$	95142,~~404~~925	$	5887,~~606~~431	$	-		$	-	$	~~494~~745,~~860~~329
Operating income (loss)(2)	$	(35,020	)	$	6,336	$	8,100	$	-		$	-	$	(20,584	)
Operating income (loss)(1)	$	(24,391	)	$	9,952	$	10,742	$	-		$	-	$	(3,697	)
Depreciation and amortization	$	3860,~~422~~601		$	59,~~716~~135	$	13,~~941~~052	$	-		$	-	$	4672,~~079~~788
Assets	$	~~642~~641,~~672~~015		$	~~177~~184,~~772~~348	$	6148,~~678~~178	$	-41,418		$	~~279~~286,~~959~~813	$	1,~~162~~201,~~081~~772
Capital expenditures	$	4668,~~331~~660		$	911,~~913~~836	$	~~818~~1,051	$	-16,282		$	36,~~996~~439	$	61104,~~058~~268

(1) ~~There~~Operating ~~were~~loss nofor ~~activities~~North ~~for~~America ~~the~~Broadband ~~three~~includes ~~and~~$44.4 ~~six~~million ~~months~~of ~~ended~~impairment ~~June~~loss 30related to our prepaid deposit to Sea Launch, which was impaired in 2009.

(2) ~~Operating~~Capital ~~loss~~expenditures ~~for~~on ~~North~~an ~~America~~accrual ~~Broadband~~basis ~~includes~~were: (i) $4493.47 million ofand ~~impairment~~$67.5 ~~loss~~million ~~related~~for tothe ~~our~~three ~~prepaid~~months ~~deposit~~ended toSeptember ~~Sea~~30, ~~Launch~~2010 and 2009, ~~which~~respectively, ~~was~~and ~~impaired~~(ii) in$217.3 million and $127.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 16: Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (in thousands)(1):

	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income (loss)	$	210,~~601~~745		$	(451,~~260~~354	)	$	(27,~~858~~887	)	$	(4951,~~724~~078	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(13,~~615~~134	)		~~6,549~~530			~~(2,422~~712	)		5,~~142~~672
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging instruments		(3,~~111~~362	)		31(2,729	)		(58,~~434~~796	)		52,~~368~~639
Reclassification of realized loss on hedging instruments		1,~~415~~390			21,~~819~~310			24,~~783~~173			13,~~965~~275
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities		(35	)		-(2	)		(16	)		-(2	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(31,~~314~~157	)		~~9,399~~(891	)		(53,~~074~~917	)		1211,~~475~~584
Comprehensive loss		(713	)		(35,861	)		(7,932	)		(37,249	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		11,902			(2,245	)		3,970			(39,494	)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		379			(540	)		72			(930	)
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(181	)		(293	)		(109	)		(1,223	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to HNS	$	(334	)	$	(36,401	)	$	(7,860	)	$	(38,179	)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	11,721		$	(2,538	)	$	3,861		$	(40,717	)

~~Note~~(1) ~~17: Commitments~~There ~~and~~is ~~Contingencies~~no tax impact for items included in the table since the Company has a full valuation allowance against its net deferred income taxes for all reporting periods.

Note 17: Net Income (loss) Attributable to HNS and Transfer from Noncontrolling Interest


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009
	(In thousands)
Net income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	8,032	$	(52,134	)

Transfers from the noncontrolling interest:
Decrease in HNS paid-in capital for purchase of subsidiary shares		-		(391	)

Change from net income (loss) attributable to HNS and transfers from the noncontrolling interest	$	8,032	$	(52,525	)

Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

We are periodically involved in litigation in the ordinary course of our business involving claims regarding intellectual property infringement, product liability, property damage, personal injury, contracts, employment and worker’s compensation. We do not believe that there are any such pending or threatened legal proceedings, including ordinary litigation incidental to the conduct of our business and the ownership of our properties that, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

In October 2008, Hughes Telecommunicaçoes do Brasil Ltda. (“HTB”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, received a tax assessment of approximately $67.32 million from the State of São Paulo Treasury Department. The tax assessment alleges that HTB failed to pay certain import taxes to the State of São Paulo. We do not believe the assessment is valid and plan to dispute the State of São Paulo’s claims and to defend vigorously against these allegations. Therefore, we have not recorded a liability. It is the opinion of management that such litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2009, an arbitration panel ruled in our favor in our arbitration against Sea Launch Limited Partnership and Sea Launch Company, LLC (collectively, “Sea Launch”) entitling us to a full refund of $44.4 million (the “Deposit”) in payments made to Sea Launch in connection with launch services for SPACEWAY 3, in addition to interest of 10% per annum on the $44.4 million from July 10, 2007 until payment on the Deposit is received in full. As a result of Sea Launch filing a voluntary petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, our efforts to pursue collection of the arbitral award were stayed under the bankruptcy laws. In June 2009, based upon information made available in the bankruptcy proceedings and other factors, we concluded that the value of the previously-recorded Deposit was impaired and recorded an impairment loss of $44.4 million. On May 27, 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement with Sea Launch to resolve the claim that we filed in the Sea Launch bankruptcy (the “Settlement Agreement”). The Settlement Agreement provides that Sea Launch will irrevocably issue to us two credits, each in the amount of $22.2 million (the “Credits”), in satisfaction and discharge of our bankruptcy claim. The Credits may be used by us to defray the cost of up to two launches contracted by December 31, 2015, and scheduled to occur by December 31, 2017. In addition, subject to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, one or both Credits may be transferred to third parties. The bankruptcy court has approved the

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

~~Settlement~~In ~~Agreement~~March 2009, an arbitration panel ruled in our favor in our arbitration against Sea Launch Limited Partnership and ~~its~~Sea ~~terms~~Launch ~~have~~Company, ~~been~~LLC ~~incorporated~~(collectively, ~~into~~“Sea Launch”) entitling us to a full refund of $44.4 million (the ~~court's~~“Deposit”) ~~order~~in ~~approving~~payments made to Sea Launch's ~~plan~~in connection with launch services for SPACEWAY 3, in addition to interest of ~~reorganization~~10% per annum on the $44.4 million from July 10, 2007 until payment on the Deposit is received in full. As a result of Sea Launch filing a voluntary petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, our efforts to pursue collection of the arbitral award were stayed under the bankruptcy laws. In June 2009, based upon information made available in the bankruptcy proceedings and other factors, we concluded that the value of the previously-recorded Deposit was impaired and recorded an impairment loss of $44.4 million. On May 27, 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement with Sea Launch to resolve the claim that we filed in the Sea Launch bankruptcy (the “Settlement Agreement”). The Settlement Agreement provides that Sea Launch will ~~become~~irrevocably ~~effective~~issue ~~upon~~to us two credits, each in the amount of $22.2 million (the “Credits”), in ~~effectiveness~~satisfaction and discharge of our bankruptcy claim. The Credits may be used by us to defray the ~~plan~~cost of ~~reorganization~~up to two launches contracted by December 31, ~~which~~2015, isand ~~expected~~scheduled to occur ~~later~~by inDecember 31, 2017. In addition, subject to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, one or both Credits may be transferred to third parties. The bankruptcy court has approved the Settlement Agreement, and its terms have been incorporated into the court's order approving Sea Launch's plan of reorganization. The Settlement Agreement became effective on October 27, 2010.

On May 18, 2009, the Company and HCI received notice of a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by two California subscribers to the HughesNet service. The plaintiffs complain about the speed of the HughesNet service, the Fair Access Policy, early termination fees and certain terms and conditions of the HughesNet subscriber agreement. The plaintiffs seek to pursue their claims as a class action on behalf of other California subscribers. On June 4, 2009, the Company and HCI received notice of a similar complaint filed by another HughesNet subscriber in the Superior Court of San Diego County, California. The plaintiff in this case also seeks to pursue his claims as a class action on behalf of other California subscribers. Both cases have been consolidated into a single case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. We believe that the allegations in both complaints are not meritorious and we intend to vigorously defend these matters.

On December 18, 2009, the Company and HCI received notice of a complaint filed in the Cook County, Illinois, Circuit Court by a former subscriber to the HughesNet service. The complaint seeks a declaration allowing the former subscriber to file a class arbitration challenging early termination fees under the subscriber agreement. We believe that the allegations in this complaint are not meritorious and we intend to vigorously defend this matter.

Commitments

In June 2009, we entered into an agreement with SS/L for the construction of Jupiter and have agreed to make installment payments to SS/L upon the completion of each milestone as set forth in the agreement. In connection with the construction of Jupiter, we entered into a contract with Barrett Xplore Inc. (“Barrett”), whereby Barrett agreed to lease user beams and purchase gateways and terminals for the Jupiter satellite that are designed to operate in Canada. In April 2010, we entered into an agreement with Arianespace for the launch of Jupiter in the first half of 2012. Pursuant to the agreement, the Ariane 5 ~~heavy launcher~~ will launch Jupiter into geosynchronous transfer orbit from Guiana Space Centre in Kourou, French Guiana. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our remaining obligation for the construction and launch of Jupiter was approximately $~~274~~259.89 million.

We are contingently liable under standby letters of credit and bonds in the aggregate amount of $23.52 million that were undrawn as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010. Of this amount, $54.39 million was issued under the Revolving Credit Facility; $1.6 million was secured by restricted cash; $1.0 million related to insurance bonds; and $15.67 million was issued under credit arrangements ~~available~~ available to our Indian and Brazilian subsidiaries. Certain letters of credit issued by our ~~Indian~~foreign subsidiaries are secured by ~~their~~certain assets. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, these obligations were scheduled to expire as follows: $86.16 million in 2010; $1112.97 million in 2011; $0.78 million in 2012; and $23.81 million in 2013 and thereafter.

Note 18: Supplemental Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information

Certain of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (HNS Real Estate LLC, Hughes Network Systems International Service Company, HNS India VSAT, Inc., HNS Shanghai, Inc. and Helius (together, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”)) have fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, payment of the Senior Notes. In lieu of providing separate unaudited financial statements of the Co-Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries, condensed financial statements prepared in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X are presented below. The column marked “Parent” represents our results of operations, with the subsidiaries accounted for using the equity method. The column marked “Guarantor Subsidiaries” includes the results of the guarantor subsidiaries along with the results of the Co-Issuer, a finance subsidiary which is 100% owned by the Company and which had no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows for the periods presented. The column marked “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries” includes the results of non-guarantor subsidiaries of the Company. Eliminations necessary to arrive at the information for the Company on a consolidated basis for the periods presented are included in the column so labeled. Separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Co-Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because management has determined that they are not material to investors.

The following represents the supplemental condensed financial statements of the Company, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-guarantor Subsidiaries. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

~~Condensed~~Note 19: Subsequent ~~Consolidated~~Event ~~Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010~~

~~(In~~On ~~thousands)~~October 29, 2010, the Company entered into a $115 million loan agreement with BNP Paribas and Societe Generale to finance the launch related costs for Jupiter, our next generation, high-throughput, Ka-band satellite. The loan will be guaranteed by COFACE, the French Export Credit Agency. Arianespace has been contracted by the Company to launch Jupiter, the estimated launch date being in the first half of 2012.

~~(Unaudited)~~Loan draw-downs, which will begin in the fourth quarter, will occur over the construction period for the launch vehicle up to the time of the launch. Terms of the loan include a fixed interest rate of 5.13% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears, and a repayment period of 8.5 years after the launch. The agreement also contains covenants and conditions which are customary for financings of this type.

	Parent		GuarantorSubsidiaries		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Eliminations			Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	93,402	$	210	$	9,569	$	-		$	103,181
Marketable securities		25,020		-		-		-			25,020
Receivables, net		121,410		52		47,484		(10,094	)		158,852
Inventories		44,977		-		13,372		-			58,349
Prepaid expenses and other		7,343		75		15,458		-			22,876
Total current assets		292,152		337		85,883		(10,094	)		368,278
Property, net		606,181		32,410		27,205		-			665,796
Investment in subsidiaries		112,188		-		-		(112,188	)		-
Other assets		98,169		1,289		29,051		-			128,509
Total assets	$	1,108,690	$	34,036	$	142,139	$	(122,282	)	$	1,162,583
Liabilities and equity
Accounts payable	$	80,498	$	164	$	29,500	$	(10,094	)	$	100,068
Short-term debt		2,246		-		4,515		-			6,761
Accrued liabilities and other		104,453		-		20,875		-			125,328
Total current liabilities		187,197		164		54,890		(10,094	)		232,157
Long-term debt		709,900		-		3,084		-			712,984
Other long-term liabilities		18,965		-		-		-			18,965
Total HNS’ equity		192,628		28,023		84,165		(112,188	)		192,628
Noncontrolling interest		-		5,849		-		-			5,849
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,108,690	$	34,036	$	142,139	$	(122,282	)	$	1,162,583

Note 20: Supplemental Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2009~~2010

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Parent

GuarantorSubsidiaries

Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries

Eliminations

Total

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

~~173~~103,~~991~~266

~~1,091~~166

89,~~651~~229

~~183~~112,~~733~~661

Marketable securities

3115,~~126~~000

Receivables, net

~~115~~121,~~948~~801

~~628~~28

6052,~~862~~404

(1412,~~632~~361

)

~~162~~161,~~806~~872

Inventories

4742,~~437~~999

~~138~~-

1213,~~669~~938

6056,~~244~~937

Prepaid expenses and other

79,~~421~~665

~~234~~72

1314,~~321~~675

2024,~~976~~412

Total current assets

~~375~~292,~~923~~731

~~2,091~~266

9590,~~503~~246

(1412,~~632~~361

)

~~458~~370,~~885~~882

Property, net

~~542~~668,~~642~~261

32,~~792~~354

2627,~~530~~745

~~601~~728,~~964~~360

Investment in subsidiaries

~~115~~114,~~136~~778

(~~115~~114,~~136~~778

)

Other assets

~~102~~97,~~045~~050

~~3,221~~595

2928,~~183~~248

~~134~~125,~~449~~893

Total assets

1,~~135~~172,~~746~~820

3833,~~104~~215

~~151~~146,~~216~~239

(~~129~~127,~~768~~139

)

1,~~195~~225,~~298~~135

Liabilities and equity

Accounts payable

97115,~~114~~717

~~2,272~~92

3228,~~759~~150

(1412,~~632~~361

)

~~117~~131,~~513~~598

Short-term debt

2,~~054~~271

43,~~696~~862

6,~~750~~133

Accrued liabilities and other

~~110~~121,~~088~~883

~~714~~-

23,~~124~~491

~~133~~145,~~926~~374

Total current liabilities

~~209~~239,~~256~~871

~~2,986~~92

6055,~~579~~503

(1412,~~632~~361

)

~~258~~283,~~189~~105

Long-term debt

710,~~259~~084

43,~~698~~051

~~714~~713,~~957~~135

Other long-term liabilities

1620,~~191~~963

Total HNS’ equity

~~200~~201,~~040~~902

2927,~~197~~093

8587,~~939~~685

(~~115~~114,~~136~~778

)

~~200~~201,~~040~~902

Noncontrolling interest

56,~~921~~030

Total liabilities and equity

1,~~135~~172,~~746~~820

3833,~~104~~215

~~151~~146,~~216~~239

(~~129~~127,~~768~~139

)

1,~~195~~225,~~298~~135

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated ~~Statement~~Balance ofSheet ~~Operations~~as ~~for~~of ~~the Three Months Ended June~~December 3031, ~~2010~~2009

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Parent			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Revenues	$	222,325		$	372		$	33,047		$	(4,411	)	$	251,333
Assets
Operating costs and expenses:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	173,991		$	1,091		$	8,651		$	-		$	183,733
Costs of revenues		157,791			-			24,883			(3,886	)		178,788
Marketable securities		31,126			-			-			-			31,126
Selling, general and administrative		40,467			817			6,643			(525	)		47,402
Receivables, net		115,948			628			60,862			(14,632	)		162,806
Research and development		5,355			-			-			-			5,355
Inventories		47,437			138			12,669			-			60,244
Amortization of intangible assets		683			-			-			-			683
Prepaid expenses and other		7,421			234			13,321			-			20,976
Total operating costs and expenses		204,296			817			31,526			(4,411	)		232,228
Total current assets		375,923			2,091			95,503			(14,632	)		458,885
Operating income (loss)		18,029			(445	)		1,521			-			19,105
Property, net		542,642			32,792			26,530			-			601,964
Other income (expense):
Investment in subsidiaries		115,136			-			-			(115,136	)		-
Interest expense		(15,248	)		-			(385	)		118			(15,515	)
Other assets		102,045			3,221			29,183			-			134,449
Interest and other income (loss), net		479			-			213			(118	)		574
Total assets	$	1,135,746		$	38,104		$	151,216		$	(129,768)		$	1,195,298
Equity in losses of subsidiaries		(262	)		-			-			262			-
Liabilities and equity
Income (loss) before income tax expense		2,998			(445	)		1,349			262			4,164
Accounts payable	$	97,114		$	2,272		$	32,759		$	(14,632	)	$	117,513
Income tax expense		(204	)		-			(1,359	)		-			(1,563	)
Short-term debt		2,054			-			4,696			-			6,750
Net income (loss)		2,794			(445	)		(10	)		262			2,601
Accrued liabilities and other		110,088			714			23,124			-			133,926
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		-			(142	)		335			-			193
Total current liabilities		209,256			2,986			60,579			(14,632	)		258,189
Net income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	2,794		$	(587	)	$	325		$	262		$	2,794
Long-term debt		710,259			-			4,698			-			714,957
Other long-term liabilities		16,191			-			-			-			16,191
Total HNS’ equity		200,040			29,197			85,939			(115,136	)		200,040
Noncontrolling interest		-			5,921			-			-			5,921
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,135,746		$	38,104		$	151,216		$	(129,768	)	$	1,195,298

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, ~~2009~~2010

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Parent			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Revenues	$	~~223~~232,~~235~~620		$	~~2,195~~277		$	3536,~~453~~136		$	(54,~~777~~318	)	$	~~255~~264,~~106~~715
Operating costs and expenses:
Costs of revenues		~~166~~161,~~510~~150			~~1,503~~-			25,~~409~~271			(52,~~047~~259	)		~~188~~184,~~375~~162
Selling, general and administrative		3740,~~659~~838			~~1,205~~726			69,~~167~~160			(~~730~~2,059	)		4448,~~301~~665
Loss on impairment		44,400			-			-			-			44,400
Research and development		4,776			-			-			-			4,776
Research and development		4,966			732			-			-			5,698
Amortization of intangible assets		682			-			-			-			682
Amortization of intangible assets		1,105			281			-			-			1,386
Total operating costs and expenses		207,446			726			34,431			(4,318	)		238,285
Total operating costs and expenses		254,640			3,721			31,576			(5,777	)		284,160
Operating income (loss)		25,174			(449	)		1,705			-			26,430
Operating income (loss)		(31,405	)		(1,526	)		3,877			-			(29,054	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(1514,~~318~~098	)		-			(~~232~~371	)		-(24	)		(1514,~~550~~493	)
Interest and other income (loss), net		(250	)		-			56			-			(194	)
Interest and other income, net		249			-			86			24			359
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		1,469			-			-			(1,469	)		-
Equity in losses of subsidiaries		(308	)		-			-			308			-
Income (loss) before income tax expense		~~(45~~11,~~504~~017	)		(~~1,526~~449	)		31,~~701~~420			~~(1,469~~308	)		~~(44~~12,~~798~~296	)
Income tax expense		(~~206~~217	)		-			(~~256~~1,334	)		-			(~~462~~1,551	)
Net income (loss)		~~(45~~10,~~710~~800	)		(~~1,526~~449	)		~~3,445~~86			~~(1,469~~308	)		~~(45~~10,~~260~~745	)
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		-			(~~609~~481	)		~~159~~536			-			~~(450~~55	)
Net income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	~~(45~~10,~~710~~800	)	$	(~~2,135~~930	)	$	~~3,604~~622		$	~~(1,469~~308	)	$	~~(45~~10,~~710~~800	)

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the ~~Six~~Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~ 2009

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Parent			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Revenues	$	~~434~~216,~~796~~258		$	13,~~360~~918		$	6534,~~682~~568		$	(84,~~362~~275	)	$	~~493~~250,~~476~~469
Operating costs and expenses:
Costs of revenues		~~313~~158,~~119~~179			~~306~~2,237			4925,~~375~~744			(73,~~476~~620	)		~~355~~182,~~324~~540
Selling, general and administrative		8137,~~553~~667			21,~~189~~286			135,~~226~~906			(~~886~~655	)		9644,~~082~~204
Research and development		94,~~815~~792			~~455~~661			-			-			105,~~270~~453
Amortization of intangible assets		1,~~217~~103			~~168~~282			-			-			1,385
Total operating costs and expenses		~~405~~201,~~704~~741			34,~~118~~466			6231,~~601~~650			(84,~~362~~275	)		~~463~~233,~~061~~582
Operating income (loss)		2914,~~092~~517			(~~1,758~~548	)		32,~~081~~918			-			3016,~~415~~887
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(3117,~~041~~418	)		-			(~~705~~309	)		~~126~~-			(3117,~~620~~727	)
Interest and other income (loss), net		120			870			263			(126	)		1,127
Interest and other income, net		397			-			70			-			467
Equity in losses of subsidiaries		(508	)		-			-			508			-
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		1,181			-			-			(1,181	)		-
Income (loss) before income tax expense		(21,~~337~~323	)		(~~888~~548	)		2,~~639~~679			~~508~~(1,181	)		(78373	)
Income tax expense		(~~431~~247	)		(3-	)		(~~2,346~~734	)		-			(~~2,780~~981	)
Net income (loss)		(21,~~768~~570	)		(~~891~~548	)		~~293~~1,945			~~508~~(1,181	)		(21,~~858~~354	)
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		-			(~~283~~302	)		~~373~~86			-			90(216	)
Net income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	(21,~~768~~570	)	$	(~~1,174~~850	)	$	~~666~~2,031		$	~~508~~(1,181	)	$	(21,~~768~~570	)

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2009~~ 2010

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Parent			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Revenues	$	~~433~~667,~~050~~416		$	41,~~027~~637		$	69101,~~255~~818		$	(1112,~~472~~680	)	$	~~494~~758,~~860~~191
Operating costs and expenses:
Costs of revenues		~~325~~474,~~893~~269			~~2,168~~306			5074,~~933~~646			(9,~~868~~735	)		~~369~~539,~~126~~486
Selling, general and administrative		74122,~~438~~391			2,~~558~~915			1222,~~706~~386			(12,~~604~~945	)		88144,~~098~~747
Loss on impairment		44,400			-			-			-			44,400
Research and development		14,591			455			-			-			15,046
Research and development		9,622			1,427			-			-			11,049
Amortization of intangible assets		1,899			168			-			-			2,067
Amortization of intangible assets		2,208			563			-			-			2,771
Total operating costs and expenses		613,150			3,844			97,032			(12,680	)		701,346
Total operating costs and expenses		456,561			6,716			63,639			(11,472	)		515,444
Operating income (loss)		54,266			(2,207	)		4,786			-			56,845
Operating income (loss)		(23,511	)		(2,689	)		5,616			-			(20,584	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(2845,~~971~~139	)		-			(~~408~~1,076	)		-102			(2946,~~379~~113	)
Interest and other income (loss), net		(103	)		-			136			-			33
Interest and other income, net		369			870			349			(102	)		1,486
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		2,401			-			-			(2,401	)		-
Equity in losses of subsidiaries		(816	)		-			-			816			-
Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit		(50,184	)		(2,689	)		5,344			(2,401	)		(49,930	)
Income (loss) before income tax expense		8,680			(1,337	)		4,059			816			12,218
Income tax (expense) benefit		(380	)		-			586			-			206
Income tax expense		(648	)		(3	)		(3,680	)		-			(4,331	)
Net income (loss)		~~(50~~8,~~564~~032	)		(21,~~689~~340	)		~~5,930~~379			~~(2,401~~816	)		~~(49~~7,~~724~~887	)
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		-			(~~1,138~~764	)		~~298~~909			-			~~(840~~145	)
Net income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	~~(50~~8,~~564~~032	)	$	(32,~~827~~104	)	$	61,~~228~~288		$	~~(2,401~~816	)	$	~~(50~~8,~~564~~032	)

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of ~~Cash~~Operations ~~Flows~~ for the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~ 2009

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Parent			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Revenues	$	649,308		$	7,945		$	103,823		$	(15,747	)	$	745,329
Net income (loss)	$	(2,768	)	$	(891	)	$	293		$	508		$	(2,858	)
Operating costs and expenses:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities		39,232			652			5,553			(508	)		44,929
Costs of revenues		484,072			4,405			76,677			(13,488	)		551,666
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		36,464			(239	)		5,846			-			42,071
Selling, general and administrative		112,105			3,844			18,612			(2,259	)		132,302
Cash flows from investing activities:
Loss on impairment		44,400			-			-			-			44,400
Change in restricted cash		(1	)		-			95			-			94
Research and development		14,414			2,088			-			-			16,502
Purchases of marketable securities		(32,615	)		-			-			-			(32,615	)
Amortization of intangible assets		3,311			845			-			-			4,156
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		38,615			-			-			-			38,615
Total operating costs and expenses		658,302			11,182			95,289			(15,747	)		749,026
Expenditures for property		(115,001	)		(642	)		(5,659	)		-			(121,302	)
Operating income (loss)		(8,994	)		(3,237	)		8,534			-			(3,697	)
Expenditures for capitalized software		(6,170	)		-			-			-			(6,170	)
Other income (expense):
Proceeds from sale of property		20			-			244			-			264
Interest expense		(46,389	)		-			(717	)		-			(47,106	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(115,152	)		(642	)		(5,320	)		-			(121,114	)
Interest and other income, net		294			-			206			-			500
Cash flows from financing activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		3,582			-			-			(3,582	)		-
Short-term revolver borrowings		-			-			3,263			-			3,263
Income (loss) before income tax expense		(51,507	)		(3,237	)		8,023			(3,582	)		(50,303	)
Repayments of revolver borrowings		-			-			(3,745	)		-			(3,745	)
Income tax expense		(627	)		-			(148	)		-			(775	)
Long-term debt borrowings		1,116			-			1,417			-			2,533
Net income (loss)		(52,134	)		(3,237	)		7,875			(3,582	)		(51,078	)
Repayments of long-term debt		(1,283	)		-			(2,644	)		-			(3,927	)
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		-			(1,440	)		384			-			(1,056	)
Debt issuance costs		(1,734	)		-			-			-			(1,734	)
Net income (loss) attributable to HNS	$	(52,134	)	$	(4,677	)	$	8,259		$	(3,582	)	$	(52,134	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,901	)		-			(1,709	)		-			(3,610	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		-			-			2,101			-			2,101
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(80,589	)		(881	)		918			-			(80,552	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		173,991			1,091			8,651			-			183,733
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	93,402		$	210		$	9,569		$	-		$	103,181

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2009~~ 2010

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Parent			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	~~(50~~8,~~564~~032	)	$	(21,~~689~~340	)	$	~~5,930~~379		$	~~(2,401~~816	)	$	~~(49~~7,~~724~~887	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities		~~102~~92,~~917~~496			21,~~731~~452			(29,~~562~~047	)		~~2,401~~(816	)		~~105~~102,~~487~~179
Net cash provided by operating activities		52,353			42			3,368			-			55,763
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		100,528			112			9,426			-			110,066
Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash		(1-	)		-			5249			-			5149
Expenditures for property		(43,933	)		(1,142	)		(8,221	)		-			(53,296	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(37,615	)		-			-			-			(37,615	)
Expenditures for capitalized software		(7,762	)		-			-			-			(7,762	)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		53,615			-			-			-			53,615
Proceeds from sale of property		18			6			69			-			93
Expenditures for property		(175,640	)		(1,037	)		(6,854	)		-			(183,531	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(51,678	)		(1,136	)		(8,100	)		-			(60,914	)
Expenditures for capitalized software		(9,935	)		-			-			-			(9,935	)
Proceeds from sale of property		13			-			391			-			404
Net cash used in investing activities		(169,562	)		(1,037	)		(6,414	)		-			(177,013	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net decrease in notes and loans payable		-			-			(78	)		-			(78	)
Short-term revolver borrowings		-			-			3,770			-			3,770
Long-term debt borrowings		137,338			-			3,769			-			141,107
Repayments of revolver borrowings		-			-			(4,881	)		-			(4,881	)
Repayments of long-term debt		(4,294	)		-			(1,209	)		-			(5,503	)
Long-term debt borrowings		1,699			-			1,635			-			3,334
Debt issuance costs		(4,500	)		-			-			-			(4,500	)
Repayments of long-term debt		(1,656	)		-			(3,208	)		-			(4,864	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		128,544			-			2,482			-			131,026
Debt issuance costs		(1,734	)		-			-			-			(1,734	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		-			-			(1,741	)		-			(1,741	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,691	)		-			(2,684	)		-			(4,375	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		129,219			(1,094	)		(3,991	)		-			124,134
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		-			-			250			-			250
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		75,956			2,013			22,293			-			100,262
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(70,725	)		(925	)		578			-			(71,072	)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	205,175		$	919		$	18,302		$	-		$	224,396
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		173,991			1,091			8,651			-			183,733
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	103,266		$	166		$	9,229		$	-		$	112,661

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(52,134	)	$	(3,237	)	$	7,875		$	(3,582	)	$	(51,078	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities		167,647			6,491			(3,587	)		3,582			174,133

Net cash provided by operating activities		115,513			3,254			4,288			-			123,055

Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash		(1	)		-			(71	)		-			(72	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(25,080	)		-			-			-			(25,080	)
Expenditures for property		(80,308	)		(4,183	)		(9,462	)		-			(93,953	)
Expenditures for capitalized software		(10,315	)		-			-			-			(10,315	)
Proceeds from sale of property		22			-			317			-			339
Long-term loan receivable		(10,000	)		-			-			-			(10,000	)
Other, net		(410	)		-			(345	)		-			(755	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(126,092	)		(4,183	)		(9,561	)		-			(139,836	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net decrease in notes and loans payable		-			-			(1,315	)		-			(1,315	)
Long-term debt borrowings		137,490			-			4,828			-			142,318
Repayments of long-term debt		(4,461	)		-			(2,371	)		-			(6,832	)
Debt issuance costs		(4,612	)		-			-			-			(4,612	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		128,417			-			1,142			-			129,559

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		-			-			(3,879	)		-			(3,879	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		117,838			(929	)		(8,010	)		-			108,899
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		75,956			2,013			22,293			-			100,262

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	193,794		$	1,084		$	14,283		$	-		$	209,161

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should each be read together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding our capital needs, business strategy, expectations and intentions within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. We urge you to consider statements that use the terms “believe,” “do not believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “may,” “estimate,” “strive,” “intend,” “will,” “should,” and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and because our business is subject to numerous risks, and uncertainties, our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth below under this “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and contained elsewhere in this report. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Actual results will most likely differ from those reflected in these forward-looking statements and the differences could be substantial. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements or disclose any difference, except as may be required by securities laws, between our actual results and those reflected in these statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements in this report are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved.

Overview

Hughes Network Systems, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“HNS” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”) is a telecommunications company. The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hughes Communications, Inc. (“HCI” or “Parent”). We provide equipment and services to the broadband communications marketplace. We have extensive technical expertise in satellite, wireline and wireless communications which we utilize in a number of product and service offerings. In particular, we offer a spectrum of broadband equipment and services to the managed services market, which is comprised of enterprises with a requirement to connect a large number of geographically dispersed locations with reliable, scalable, and cost-effective applications, such as credit card verification, inventory tracking and control, and broadcast video. We provide broadband network services and systems to the international and domestic enterprise markets and satellite broadband Internet access to North American consumers, which we refer to as the Consumer market. In addition, we provide networking systems to customers for mobile satellite, telematics and wireless backhaul systems. These services are generally provided on a contract or project basis and may involve the use of proprietary products engineered by us.

Strategic Initiatives and Their Impact on Our Results of Operations

WeFor the three months ended September 30, 2010, we generated a net income attributable to HNS of $210.8 million compared ~~and~~to a net loss attributable to HNS of $451.76 million for the ~~three~~ same period in 2009. For the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~and 2009~~, ~~respectively,~~we ~~and~~generated a net ~~loss~~income attributable to HNS of $2.8.0 million ~~and~~compared to a net loss attributable to HNS of $5052.61 million for the ~~six~~same ~~months~~period ~~ended~~in ~~June 30, 2010 and~~ 2009~~, respectively~~. The changes in our net income were significantly impacted by the $44.4 million impairment loss recognized in 2009, related to our prepaid deposit (the “Deposit”) paid to Sea Launch Company, LLC (“Sea Launch”). In addition, our gross margin for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 improved by $512.86 million and $1225.40 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009. The increase in our net income attributable to HNS for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was partially offset by the increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses as we increased our efforts in promoting our products and services in our North American businesses.

Technology—We incorporate advances in technology to reduce costs and to increase the functionality and reliability of our products and services. Through the usage of advanced spectrally efficient modulation and coding methodologies, such as DVB-S2, and proprietary software web acceleration and compression techniques, we continue to improve the efficiency of our networks. In addition, we invest in technologies to enhance our system and network management capabilities, specifically our managed services for enterprises. We also continue to invest in next generation technologies that can be applied to our future products and services.

~~Acquisitions,~~32 ~~Strategic Alliances and Divestitures—We continue to focus on expanding the identified markets for our~~

Acquisitions, Strategic Alliances and Divestitures—We continue to focus on expanding the identified markets for our products, services and network solutions in our North America Broadband, International Broadband and Telecom Systems segments. Consistent with our strategy to grow and improve our financial position, we also review our competitive position on an ongoing basis and, from time to time, consider various acquisitions, strategic alliances and divestitures which we believe would be beneficial to our business. We, from time to time, consider various alternatives related to the ownership structure of a new satellite, capacity features and other factors that would promote long term growth while meeting the needs of our customers.

In June 2009, we entered into an agreement with Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (“SS/L”) under which SS/L will manufacture our next-generation, geostationary high throughput ~~geostationary~~ satellite (“~~Jupiter~~HTS”) named Jupiter. Jupiter will employ a multi-spot beam, bent pipe Ka-band architecture and will provide additional capacity for the HughesNet service in North America. In connection with the construction of Jupiter, we entered into a contract with Barrett Xplore Inc. (“Barrett”), whereby Barrett agreed to lease user beams and purchase gateways and terminals for the Jupiter satellite that are designed to operate in Canada. In connection with the lease agreement with Barrett, our revenue backlog associated with our Jupiter satellite is $245.0 million, which is expected to be realized over 15 years once Jupiter is launched and placed into service. In April 2010, we entered into an agreement with Arianespace for the launch of Jupiter in the first half of 2012. Pursuant to the agreement, the Ariane 5 ~~heavy launcher~~ will launch Jupiter into geosynchronous transfer orbit from Guiana Space Centre in in Kourou, French Guiana. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our remaining obligation for the construction and launch of Jupiter was approximately $~~274~~259.89 million.

As a result of our efforts to expand the identified markets for our products, services and network solutions in our North America Broadband segment, in August 2010, we were awarded $58.7 million as the only national provider of high-speed satellite broadband service under the broadband programs established pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This award is part of the government’s investments in broadband projects to expand access to broadband service and create jobs and economic opportunity in rural, underserved communities nationwide. We began to offer services to customers under this program in October 2010.

Key Business Metrics

Business Segments—We divide our operations into five distinct segments—(i) the North America Broadband segment; (ii) the International Broadband segment; (iii) the Telecom Systems segment; (iv) the HTS Satellite segment; and (v) the Corporate segment. Within the North America Broadband segment, sales are attributed to the Consumer group, which delivers broadband internet service to consumer customers, and the Enterprise group, which provides satellite, wireline and wireless communication networks and services to enterprises. The International Broadband segment consists of our international service companies and provides managed network services and equipment to enterprise customers and broadband service providers worldwide. The Telecom Systems segment consists of the Mobile Satellite Systems group, the Telematics group, and the Terrestrial Microwave group. The Mobile Satellite Systems group provides turnkey satellite ground segment systems to mobile system operators. The Telematics group previously provided development engineering and manufacturing services to Hughes Telematics, Inc. (“HTI”). However, as a result of the unfavorable impact of the economy on the automobile industry, HTI terminated substantially all of the development engineering and manufacturing services with us in August 2009. We expect our future revenue from the Telematics group to be insignificant. The Terrestrial Microwave group provides point-to-multipoint microwave radio network systems that are used for both cellular backhaul and broadband wireless access. The HTS Satellite segment, which is a new segment starting in 2010, consists of activities related to the development, construction and launch of high throughput satellites and currently represents construction activities of Jupiter. The Corporate segment includes our corporate offices and assets not specifically related to another business segment. Due to the complementary nature and common architecture of our services and products across our business segments, we are able to leverage our expertise and resources within our various operating units to yield significant cost efficiencies.

Revenues—We generate revenues from the sale and financing of hardware and the provision of services. In our North America and International Broadband segments, we generate revenues from services and hardware. In our Telecom Systems segment, we generate revenues primarily from the development and sale of hardware. Some of our enterprise customers purchase equipment separately and operate their own networks. These customers include large enterprises, incumbent local exchange carriers, governmental agencies and resellers. Contracts for our services vary in length depending on the customers’ requirements.

3233

Services—Our services revenue is varied in nature and includes ~~total~~equipment ~~turnkey~~rental from our consumer rental program, total turnkey communications services, terminal relocation, maintenance and changes, transponder capacity and multicast or broadcast services. Our services are offered on a contractual basis, which vary in length based on the particular end market. Typically, our large enterprise customers enter into a three- to five-year contract, and our consumer customers enter into a 24-month contract. We bill and recognize service revenues on a monthly per site basis. For enterprise customers who receive services from our network operations, our services include the following:

Service Type Description Broadbandconnectivity • • Provides basic transport, intranet connectivity services and internet service provider services • Applications include high-speed internet access, IP VPN, multicast file delivery and streaming, point-of-sale credit transactions, enterprise back-office communications, and satellite backup for frame relay service and other terrestrial networks Managed networkservices • • Provides one-stop turnkey suite of bundled services that include wireline and wireless satellite networks • Includes network design program management, installation management, network and application engineering services, proactive network management, network operations, field maintenance and customer care ISP services andhosted application • Provides internet connectivity and hosted customer-owned and managed applications on our network facilities • Provides the customer application services developed by us or in conjunction with our service partners • Includes internet access, e-mail services, web hosting and online payments Digital mediaservices • Digital content management and delivery including video, online learning and digital signage applications Customized businesssolutions • Provides customized, industry-specific enterprise solutions that can be applied to multiple businesses in a given industry

Our services to enterprise customers are negotiated on a contract-by-contract basis with price varying based on numerous factors, including number of sites, complexity of system and scope of services provided. We have the ability to integrate these service offerings to provide comprehensive solutions for our customers. We also provide managed services to our customers who operate their own dedicated network facilities and charge them a management fee for the operation and support of their networks.

Hardware—We offer our enterprise customers the option to purchase their equipment up front or to finance the sale through a third-party leasing company as part of their service agreement under which payments are made over a fixed term. Our consumer customers also have the option to purchase the equipment up front ~~or, beginning in September 2008, to rent the equipment~~ with a 24-month service contract. Hardware revenues of the North American Enterprise group and International Broadband segment are derived from: (i) network operating centers; (ii) radio frequency terminals (earth stations); (iii) VSAT components including indoor units, outdoor units, and antennas; (iv) voice, video and data appliances; (v) routers and DSL modems; and (vi) system integration services to integrate all of the above into a system.

We also provide specialized equipment to our Mobile Satellite Systems and Terrestrial Microwave customers. Through large multi-year contracts, we develop and supply turnkey networking and terminal systems for various operators who offer mobile satellite-based services. We also supply microwave-based networking equipment to mobile operators for back-hauling their data from cellular telephone sites to their switching centers. In addition, local exchange carriers use our equipment for broadband access traffic from corporations bypassing local phone companies. The size and scope of these projects vary from year to year by customer and do not follow a pattern that can be reasonably predicted.

3334

Market trends impacting our revenues—The following table presents our revenues by end market for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
	2010		2009		Amount			%
Revenues:
Services revenues	$	~~192~~200,~~155~~709	$	~~172~~175,~~662~~305	$	1925,~~493~~404		~~11.3%~~	14.5	%
Hardware sales		5964,~~178~~006		8275,~~444~~164		(2311,~~266~~158	)	~~(28.2)%~~	(14.8	)%
Total revenues	$	~~251~~264,~~333~~715	$	~~255~~250,~~106~~469	$	(314,~~773~~246	)	~~(1.5)%~~	5.7	%
Revenues by end market:
North America Broadband segment:
Consumer	$	~~117~~122,~~578~~166	$	~~104~~107,~~206~~085	$	1315,~~372~~081		~~12.8%~~	14.1	%
Enterprise		6068,~~446~~378		7167,~~036~~038		~~(10~~1,~~590~~340	)	~~(14.9)%~~	2.0	%
Total North America Broadband segment		~~178~~190,~~024~~544		~~175~~174,~~242~~123		216,~~782~~421		~~1.6%~~	9.4	%
International Broadband segment		4751,~~853~~778		5047,~~520~~521		(24,~~667~~257	)	~~(5.3)%~~	9.0	%
Telecom Systems segment:
Mobile Satellite Systems		20,~~628~~070		1917,~~369~~309		12,~~259~~761		~~6.5%~~	16.0	%
Telematics		~~200~~-		78,~~659~~709		(78,~~459~~709	)	~~(97.4)%~~	(100.0	)%
Terrestrial Microwave		42,~~628~~323		2,~~316~~807		~~2,312~~(484	)	~~99.8%~~	(17.2	)%
Total Telecom Systems segment		2522,~~456~~393		2928,~~344~~825		(36,~~888~~432	)	~~(13.2)%~~	(22.3	)%
Total revenues	$	~~251~~264,~~333~~715	$	~~255~~250,~~106~~469	$	(314,~~773~~246	)	~~(1.5)%~~	5.7	%

The following table presents our churn rate, average revenue per unit (“ARPU”), average monthly gross subscriber additions, and subscribers ~~as of or for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009~~:

	As of or For theThree Months Ended June 30,						Variance
	As of or For theThree Months EndedSeptember 30,						Variance
	2010			2009			Amount			%
Churn rate(1)		2.~~01%~~22	%		2.~~27%~~30	%		(0.~~26)%~~08	)%	~~(11.5)%~~	(3.5)%
ARPU(2)	$	7375		$	7071		$	34		~~4.3%~~	5.6%
Average monthly gross subscriber additions(1)		1516,~~800~~500			16,~~600~~800			(~~800)~~300	)	~~(4.8)%~~	(1.8)%
Subscribers(1)		~~545~~558,~~500~~200			~~473~~490,~~100~~000			7268,~~400~~200		~~15.3%~~	13.9%

(1) Relates to our Consumer group and our small/medium enterprise and wholesale business customers who receive subscription services. The small/medium enterprise and wholesale business customers are part of our Enterprise group. The Consumer and Enterprise groups are part of our North America Broadband segment. The trend of ~~the~~this metric has been substantially similar for the Consumer group and the small/medium enterprise and wholesale business customers.

(2)	Relates only to our Consumer group, which is part of our North America Broadband segment.

North America Broadband Segment

Revenue from our Consumer group for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 increased by 1214.81% to $~~117~~122.62 million compared to the same period in 2009. The growth in our Consumer group has been driven primarily by three factors: (i) the substantial growth in the number of subscribers arising from increased consumer awareness of our products and services as a result of the expansion of our use of direct mail campaigns and television commercials targeting geographic areas that have historically been underserved by DSL and cable services; (ii) value-added services, such as express repair and web premium content services, and the election by our customers to utilize the consumer rental program and to subscribe to higher level service plans resulting in an increase in ARPU; and (iii) improvements in customer retention as shown by the reduction in the churn rate.

3435

As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009, we achieved a total subscription base of ~~545~~558,~~500~~200 and ~~473~~ 490,~~100~~000, respectively, which included 3234,~~100~~400 and 2225,~~500~~800, respectively, subscribers in our small/medium enterprise and wholesale businesses. Our ARPU, which is used to measure average monthly consumer subscription service revenues on a per subscriber basis, was $7375 and $7071 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ARPU is calculated by dividing the total service revenues from the Consumer group for the reporting period by the sum of the total number of subscribers in our Consumer group at the end of each month in the reporting period. Churn rate represents the average of the monthly churn rates for the months included in the reporting period. Monthly churn rate is calculated by dividing the number of subscribers at the end of the month by the number of churns for the month for the subscribers in our Consumer group and our small/medium enterprise and wholesale business customers. Our ARPU ~~calculation~~and churn rate calculations may not be consistent with other companies’ calculation in the same or similar businesses as we are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating ARPU.

Revenue from our North American Enterprise group for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~decreased~~increased by 142.90% to $6068.4 million compared to the same period in 2009. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to ~~delays~~the inrealization ~~customer~~of ~~buying~~service ~~decisions~~revenues ~~impacting~~from ~~new~~our ~~hardware~~contracts ~~orders~~booked in prior periods. Enterprise service revenue is generally characterized by long term contracts.

International Broadband Segment

Revenue from our International Broadband segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~decreased~~increased by 59.30% to $4751.98 million compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to ~~delays~~an increase in ~~customer~~hardware ~~buying~~orders ~~decisions~~and ~~impacting~~higher ~~new~~service ~~hardware~~revenues ~~orders~~from our Brazil and global service operations. ~~The~~Also ~~decrease~~contributing ~~was~~to ~~partially~~the ~~offset~~increase bywas $10.98 million resulting from the favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.

Telecom Systems Segment

Revenue from our Telecom Systems segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased by 1322.23% to $2522.54 million compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was ~~due~~mainly attributable to our Telematics group as there was no revenue earned for the ~~reduction~~three ofmonths ended September 30, 2010 compared to $78.57 million infor ~~revenue~~the ~~from~~same ~~our~~period ~~Telematics~~in ~~group,~~2009. ~~which~~The decrease in revenue was partially offset by the increase in revenue from our ~~Terrestrial~~Mobile ~~Microwave~~Satellite Systems group.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2009

Six Months Ended June 30,

Variance

Nine Months Ended September 30,

Variance

2010

2009

Amount

Revenues:

Services revenues

~~379~~579,~~045~~754

~~334~~509,~~566~~871

4469,~~479~~883

~~13.3%~~

13.7%

Hardware sales

~~114~~178,~~431~~437

~~160~~235,~~294~~458

(4557,~~863~~021

)

~~(28.6)%~~

(24.2)%

Total revenues

~~493~~758,~~476~~191

~~494~~745,~~860~~329

(112,~~384~~862

)

~~(0.3)%~~

1.7%

Revenues by end market:

North America Broadband segment:

Consumer

~~230~~353,~~932~~098

~~202~~310,~~935~~020

2743,~~997~~078

~~13.8%~~

13.9%

Enterprise

~~121~~189,~~087~~465

~~137~~204,~~915~~953

(1615,~~828~~488

)

~~(12.2)%~~

(7.6)%

Total North America Broadband segment

~~352~~542,~~019~~563

~~340~~514,~~850~~973

1127,~~169~~590

~~3.3%~~

5.4%

International Broadband segment

91143,~~309~~087

95142,~~404~~925

~~(4,095~~162

)

~~(4.3)%~~

0.1%

Telecom Systems segment:

Mobile Satellite Systems

4060,~~033~~103

3755,~~835~~144

24,~~198~~959

~~5.8%~~

9.0%

Telematics

501

1423,~~728~~437

(1422,~~227~~936

)

~~(96.6)%~~

(97.9)%

Terrestrial Microwave

911,~~614~~937

68,~~043~~850

3,~~571~~087

~~59.1%~~

34.9%

Total Telecom Systems segment

5072,~~148~~541

5887,~~606~~431

(814,~~458~~890

)

~~(14.4)%~~

(17.0)%

Total revenues

~~493~~758,~~476~~191

~~494~~745,~~860~~329

(112,~~384~~862

)

~~(0.3)%~~

1.7%

3536

The following table presents our churn rate, ARPU, average monthly gross subscriber additions, and subscribers ~~as of or for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009~~:

	As of or For theSix Months Ended June 30,						Variance
	As of or For theNine Months Ended September 30,								Variance
	2010			~~2009~~	2009		~~Amount~~		Amount	%		%
Churn rate(1)		2.~~00%~~07	%		~~2.28%~~	2.29	%	~~(0.28)%~~		(120.322)%	%		(9.6)%
ARPU(2)	$	73		$	69$	70	$	4	$	~~5.8%~~3			4.3%
Average monthly gross subscriber additions(1)		17,~~500~~100			~~17,100~~	17,000		~~400~~		~~2.3%~~100			0.6%
Subscribers(1)		~~545~~558,~~500~~200			~~473,100~~	490,000		~~72,400~~		~~15.3%~~68,200			13.9%

(2)	Relates only to our Consumer group, which is part of our North America Broadband segment.

North America Broadband Segment

Revenue from our Consumer group for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 increased by 13.89% to $~~230~~353.91 million compared to the same period in 2009. The growth in our Consumer group has been driven primarily by three factors: (i) the substantial growth in the number of subscribers arising from increased consumer awareness of our products and services as a result of the expansion of our use of direct mail campaigns and television commercials targeting geographic areas that have historically been underserved by DSL and cable services; (ii) value-added services, such as express repair and web premium content services, and the election by our customers to utilize the consumer rental program and to subscribe to higher level service plans resulting in an increase in ARPU; and (iii) improvements in customer retention as shown by the reduction in the churn rate.

Revenue from our North American Enterprise group for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased by 127.26% to $~~121~~189.15 million compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to delays in customer buying decisions ~~impacting~~impacted new hardware orders. Enterprise service revenue is generally characterized by long term contracts.

International Broadband Segment

Revenue from our International Broadband segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~decreased~~slightly increased by 40.31% to $91143.31 million compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to ~~delays in customer buying decisions impacting new hardware orders. The decrease was partially offset by~~ the continued growth of our expanding array of solutions and global services to enterprises and government organizations in Brazil and the Africa/Middle East region, and $67.10 million resulting from the favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar. The increase was partially offset by delays in customer buying decisions which impacted new hardware orders.

Telecom Systems Segment

Revenue from our Telecom Systems segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased by 1417.40% to $5072.15 million compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to ~~the~~a reduction in revenue from our Telematics group of $1422.29 million into ~~revenue~~$0.5 ~~from~~million ~~our~~compared ~~Telematics~~to ~~group,~~the same ~~which~~period in 2009. The decrease in revenue was partially offset by the increase in revenue from our Mobile Satellite Systems and Terrestrial Microwave ~~group~~groups.

~~Cost~~Revenue ~~of Services~~Backlog—~~Our~~We ~~cost~~benefit offrom ~~services~~strong ~~primarily~~visibility ~~consists~~ of ~~transponder~~our ~~capacity~~future ~~leases,~~revenues. ~~hub~~At ~~infrastructure~~September 30, ~~customer~~2010 ~~care, wireline~~ and ~~wireless~~December 31, ~~capacity~~2009, ~~depreciation~~our ~~expense~~total ~~related~~backlog, towhich ~~network~~we ~~infrastructure~~define ~~and~~as ~~capitalized~~our ~~hardware~~expected ~~and~~future revenue ~~software,~~under ~~and~~customer ~~the~~contracts ~~salaries~~that ~~and~~are ~~related~~non-cancelable ~~employment~~and ~~costs~~excludes ~~for~~agreements ~~those~~with ~~employees~~our ~~who~~consumer ~~manage~~customers, ~~our~~was ~~network~~approximately ~~operations~~$1,036.9 million and ~~other~~ $834.0 million,

3637

~~project areas~~respectively. ~~These~~We ~~costs~~expect ~~are~~to ~~dependent~~realize onfuture ~~the~~revenue ~~number~~from ofour ~~customers~~backlog ~~served~~as ~~and~~follows: ~~have~~$93.9 ~~increased~~million ~~relative~~in to2010, ~~our growth~~$259.3 Wemillion ~~continue~~in to2011, ~~execute~~$194.7 amillion ~~number~~in of2012, ~~cost~~$119.7 ~~containment~~million in 2013, and ~~efficiency~~$369.3 million ~~initiatives~~thereafter. ~~that~~Backlog ~~were~~also ~~implemented~~includes infuture ~~previous~~revenues ~~years.~~associated Inwith ~~addition~~the Jupiter satellite, ~~the~~which ~~migration~~is tocurrently aunder ~~single~~construction, ~~upgraded~~including ~~platform~~$245.0 ~~for~~million ~~ongoing~~associated ~~consumer~~with ~~customers~~the ~~from~~lease ~~our~~agreement ~~North~~with ~~America~~Barrett ~~Broadband~~for ~~segment~~satellite ~~has~~capacity, ~~enabled~~which usis expected to ~~leverage~~be realized ~~our~~over ~~satellite~~15 ~~bandwidth~~years ~~and~~once ~~network operation~~the ~~facilities~~satellite tois ~~achieve~~launched ~~further~~and ~~cost~~placed ~~efficiencies.~~into ~~The~~service ~~costs~~in ~~associated~~the ~~with~~first ~~transponder~~half ~~capacity~~of ~~leases~~2012. ~~for~~Of the ~~Consumer~~$245.0 ~~group~~million ~~are~~in ~~expected~~backlog, tothe ~~decline~~Company ashas ~~more~~collected ~~customers~~$5.0 ~~are~~million ~~added~~related to ~~the~~a ~~SPACEWAY~~non-refundable ~~network~~reservation fee.

The amounts included in backlog represent the full contract value for the duration of the contract and does not include termination fees. We do not assume that a contract will be renewed beyond its stated expiration date. In certain cases of breach for non-payment or customer bankruptcy, we may not be able to recover the full value of certain contracts or termination fees.

Generally, following the successful launch of a satellite, if the satellite is operating nominally, our customers may only terminate their service agreements for satellite capacity by paying us all, or substantially all, of the payments that would have otherwise become due over the term of the service agreement. In the case of our satellite under construction, Jupiter, we would not be obligated to return the customer prepayments made under service agreements for the satellite if the launch was to fail. Also, if the launch of Jupiter was significantly delayed, our customer could exercise a right of termination under its service agreement.

Cost of Services—Our cost of services primarily consists of transponder capacity leases, hub infrastructure, customer care, wireline and wireless capacity, depreciation expense related to network infrastructure and capitalized hardware and software, and the salaries and related employment costs for those employees who manage our network operations and other project areas. These costs are dependent on the number of customers served and have increased relative to our growth. We continue to execute a number of cost containment and efficiency initiatives that were implemented in previous years. In addition, the migration to a single upgraded platform for ongoing consumer customers from our North America Broadband segment has enabled us to leverage our satellite bandwidth and network operation facilities to achieve further cost efficiencies. The costs associated with transponder capacity leases for the Consumer group are expected to decline as more customers are added to the SPACEWAY network.

Cost of Hardware Products Sold—We outsource a significant portion of the manufacturing of our hardware for our North America and International Broadband and Telecom Systems segments to third-party contract manufacturers. Our cost of hardware products sold relates primarily to direct materials and subsystems (e.g., antennas), salaries and related employment costs for those employees who are directly associated with the procurement and manufacture of our products and other items of indirect overhead incurred in the procurement and production process. Cost of hardware products sold also includes certain engineering and hardware costs related to the design of a particular product for specific customer programs. In addition, certain software development costs are capitalized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 985-20 “Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” and amortized to cost of hardware products sold over their estimated useful lives. As we have developed new product offerings, we have reduced product costs due to higher levels of component integration, design improvements and volume increases.

Subscriber acquisition costs (“SAC”) are associated with our Consumer group and are comprised of three elements: (i) the subsidy for the cost of hardware and related installation; (ii) certain sales and marketing expense; and (iii) dealer and customer service representative commissions on new installations/activations. The subsidy for cost of hardware and related cost of installation is deferred and amortized over the shorter of the initial contract period or the useful life of the hardware as a component of cost of hardware products sold for hardware related sales or cost of services for activities related to the consumer rental program. The portion of SAC related to sales and marketing is expensed as incurred. Dealer and customer service representative commissions are deferred and amortized over the initial contract period as a component of sales and marketing expense.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)—Selling expenses primarily consist of the salaries, commissions, related benefit costs of our direct sales force and marketing staff, advertising, channel compensations on new activations which are deferred and amortized over the initial consumer contract period, travel, allocation of facilities, and other directly related overhead costs for our domestic and international businesses. General and administrative expenses include bad debt expense and salaries and related employee benefits for employees associated with common supporting functions, such as accounting and finance, risk management, legal, information technology, administration, human resources, and senior management. Selling, general, and administrative costs also include facilities costs, third-party service providers’ costs (such as outside tax and legal counsel, and insurance providers), bank fees related to credit card processing charges and depreciation of fixed assets.

~~Research~~38 and Development (“R&D”)—R&D expenses primarily consist of the salaries of certain members of our engineering staff plus an applied overhead charge. R&D expenses also include engineering support for existing platforms and development efforts to build new products and software applications, subcontractors, material purchases and other direct costs in support of product development.

Research and Development (“R&D”)—R&D expenses primarily consist of the salaries of certain members of our engineering staff plus an applied overhead charge. R&D expenses also include engineering support for existing platforms and development efforts to build new products and software applications, subcontractors, material purchases and other direct costs in support of product development.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

Revenues

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Services revenues	$	~~192~~200,~~155~~709	$	~~172~~175,~~662~~305	$	1925,~~493~~404		~~11.3%~~	14.5%
Hardware sales		5964,~~178~~006		8275,~~444~~164		(2311,~~266~~158	)	~~(28.2)%~~	(14.8)%
Total revenues	$	~~251~~264,~~333~~715	$	~~255~~250,~~106~~469	$	(314,~~773~~246	)	~~(1.5)%~~	5.7%
% of revenue to total revenues:
Services revenues		7675.58%		6770.70%
Hardware sales		2324.52%		3230.30%

Services Revenues

The increase in services revenues was attributable to our North America Broadband segment. Revenues from our Consumer group increased by $1718.36 million to $~~111~~116.58 million for the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 compared to $9498.2 million for the same period in 2009 resulting primarily from the increase in our consumer subscriber base. The increase in the Consumer group was partly due to a larger percentage of our customers utilizing the consumer rental program, for which we recognized $910.01 million and $34.39 million of services revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Services revenue from our North America Enterprise group increased by $67.9 million to $4748.23 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $40.34 million for the same period in 2009. The increase reflected the growth in our managed services business, new contracts awarded in prior periods that provided incremental services revenue in the first ~~quarter~~ quarter of 2010 and the growth in our small/medium and wholesale subscriber base.

Services revenue from our International ~~Broadband~~ Broadband segment increased by $13.62 million to $3234.13 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $3031.51 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to higher service revenues from our Brazil and global service operations and an increase of $10.86 million resulting from the favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.

The increase in services revenue was partially offset by a decrease in revenue of $64.3 million from our Telecom Systems segment to $1.43 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $75.76 million for the same period in 2009, mainly as a result of a significant reduction in revenues from the Telematics group.

Hardware Sales

Hardware sales from our North America Broadband segment decreased by $2110.51 million to $1925.35 million for the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 compared to $4035.86 million for the same period in 2009.

Despite the growth in the subscriber base, hardware sales in the Consumer group decreased by $43.05 million to $65.04 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $10.0 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to an increase in (i) the utilization of the consumer rebate program which reduced hardware revenues and (ii) customers utilizing the consumer rental program, which revenues are accounted for as services revenues, instead of the previously offered deferred purchase plan, which revenues were accounted for as hardware sales.

~~Hardware~~39 revenue from our North America Enterprise group also decreased by $17.5 million to $13.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $30.8 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to a lower volume of shipments as customers delayed their buying decisions as well as the changes in the product mix where the emphasis on managed services has led to lower upfront hardware revenue and an increase in recurring service revenue.

~~In addition, hardware sales from our International Broadband segment decreased by $4.2~~ million ~~to $15.8 million~~ for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $208.09 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was ~~primarily~~ due to aan ~~decrease~~increase in ~~shipment~~customers ~~volume~~utilizing to(i) the ~~our~~consumer rental ~~enterprise~~program, ~~customers~~which revenues are accounted for as ~~delays~~services inrevenues, ~~customer~~instead ~~buying decisions~~of ~~impacted~~the ~~new~~previously offered financed purchase plan, which revenues were accounted for as hardware ~~orders~~sales and (ii) the consumer rebate programs which reduced hardware revenues.

Hardware ~~sales~~revenue from our ~~Telecom~~North ~~Systems~~America ~~segment~~Enterprise ~~increased~~group also decreased by $26.56 million to $2420.1 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $2126.67 million for the same period in 2009,. ~~primarily~~The decrease was due to a lower volume of shipments as enterprise customers delayed their buying decisions as well as the ~~increase~~changes in the product mix where the emphasis on managed services has led to lower upfront hardware revenue ~~from~~and ~~the~~an ~~Terrestrial~~increase ~~Microwave~~in ~~group~~recurring service revenue.

In addition, hardware sales from our International Broadband segment increased by $1.1 million to $17.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $16.4 million for the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in shipment volume to our enterprise customers in India and an increase of $0.2 million resulting from the favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.

Hardware sales from our Telecom Systems segment decreased by $2.2 million to $21.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $23.2 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to the decrease in hardware revenue from the Telematics group.

Cost of Revenues

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Cost of services	$	~~123~~125,~~206~~806	$	~~111~~108,~~092~~894	$	1216,~~114~~912		~~10.9%~~	15.5%
Cost of hardware products sold		5558,~~582~~356		7773,~~283~~646		(2115,~~701~~290	)	~~(28.1)%~~	(20.8)%
Total cost of revenues	$	~~178~~184,~~788~~162	$	~~188~~182,~~375~~540	$	(91,~~587~~622	)	~~(5.1)%~~	0.9%

Cost of Services

Cost of services increased in conjunction with the increase in services ~~revenue~~revenues, mainly due to the growth in our consumer subscriber base and our managed services businesses in the North America Broadband segment. Support costs for the growth included customer service, wireline and wireless costs, field services, network operations and depreciation expense, which increased by $11.6 0 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increases were partially offset by lower transponder capacity lease expense. We expect transponder capacity lease expense for the Consumer group to continue to decrease as more customers are placed on the SPACEWAY network.

In addition, cost of services from our International Broadband segment increased by $3.32 million, primarily due to an increase in the number of enterprise and global service sites in service across Brazil and ~~the~~global ~~Africa/Middle~~service ~~East region~~operations. The increase in cost of services was partially offset by a decrease of $53.2 million from the Telecom Systems segment to $1.02 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $64.24 million for the same period in 2009, mainly related to the Telematics group.

Cost of Hardware Products Sold

Cost of hardware products sold decreased in conjunction with the reduction in hardware sales. The decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease in cost of hardware products sold from our North America Broadband segment of $1711.58 million to $2931.06 million for the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 compared to $4643.54 million for the same period in 2009.

Despite the growth in the consumer subscriber base, the cost of hardware products sold in the Consumer group decreased by $6.7.5 million to $1211.31 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $1918.06 million for the ~~same period in 2009. The decrease was due to (i) an increase in the number of customers utilizing the consumer rental program,~~ for which hardware cost is accounted for as a component of services cost, instead of the previously offered deferred purchase plan, which cost was accounted for as hardware cost and (ii) a decrease in hardware unit cost as a result of improved manufacturing efficiency.

In40 addition, cost of hardware products sold from our International Broadband segment decreased by $4.6 million to $9.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $13.9 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in hardware sales.

Cost of hardware products sold from our Telecom Systems segment remained flat at $17.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $16.9 million for the same period in 2009.

same period in 2009. The decrease was due to (i) an increase in the number of customers utilizing the consumer rental program, for which hardware cost is accounted for as a component of services cost, instead of the previously offered financed purchase plan, which cost was accounted for as hardware cost, and (ii) a decrease in hardware unit cost as a result of improved manufacturing efficiency.

In addition, cost of hardware products sold from our Telecom Systems segment decreased by $4.0 million to $15.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $19.0 million for the same period in 2009, mainly related to the Telematics group.

Cost of hardware products sold from our International Broadband segment remained flat at $11.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $11.3 million for the same period in 2009.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	4748,~~402~~665	$	44,~~301~~204	$	34,~~101~~461	~~7.0%~~	10.1%
% of revenue		18.94%		17.46%

SG&A expense increased mainly due to higher ~~marketing~~ costs of: (i) $23.73 million, ~~primarily~~ in our North American ~~America~~ operations, as we increased targeted marketing spending for our consumer ~~business.~~and ~~From~~enterprise ~~time~~businesses toand ~~time,~~(ii) $1.9 wemillion ~~modify~~at our ~~marketing~~international ~~strategy~~subsidiaries. toThese ~~attract~~increases ~~new~~were ~~customers,~~partially ~~which~~offset ~~may~~by ~~impact~~lower ~~our~~costs ~~SG&A~~of ~~expense~~$0.7 million across the other operating segments of the company.

Loss on Impairment

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Loss on impairment	$	-	$	44,400	$	(44,400	)	(100.0)%
% of revenue		0.0%		17.4%

There was no impairment loss recognized in 2010. In 2009, we recognized $44.4 million of impairment loss, related to the Deposit paid to Sea Launch.

Research and Development

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Research and development	$	54,~~355~~776	$	5,~~698~~453	$	(~~343~~677)	)	~~(6.0)%~~	(12.4)%
% of revenue		2.1.8%		2.2%

R&D decreased due to a reduction in development activities of $12.80 million from our North America Broadband segment. This decrease was partially offset by the increase in R&D activities of $01.90 million and $0.3 million related to the construction of Jupiter and our Mobile Satellite Systems group, respectively.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Amortization of intangible assets	$	~~683~~682	$	1,~~386~~385	$	(703)	)	~~(50.7)%~~	(50.8)%
% of revenue		0.3%		0.56%

Amortization of intangible assets decreased primarily due to the impact of ~~fully depreciated~~ intangible assets reaching inthe ~~2009~~end of their estimated life.

Operating Income (loss)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%
Operating income (loss)	$	19,105	$	(29,054)	$	48,159	165.8%
% of revenue		7.6%		(11.4)%

For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we generated $19.1 million of operating income compared to an operating loss of $29.1 million for the same period in 2009. The change in operating income (loss) was significantly impacted by the recognition of $44.4 million in impairment loss, which was related to the Deposit paid to Sea Launch, in 2009. In addition, our gross margin was higher by $5.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in our operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was partially offset by higher SG&A expenses as we increased our efforts in promoting our products and services.

Interest Expense

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Interest expense	$	15,515	$	15,550	$	(35	)	(0.2)%

Interest expense primarily relates to interest on the $450 million of 9.50% senior notes maturing on April 15, 2014 (the “2006 Senior Notes”), $150.0 million of 9.50% senior notes maturing on April 15, 2014 (the “2009 Senior Notes”) and the $115 million term loan maturing on April 15, 2014 (the “Term Loan Facility”) less capitalized interest associated with the construction of our satellite. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 remained flat compared to the same period in 2009. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, interest expense related to the 2009 Senior Notes was higher by $2.4 million compared to the same period in 2009, mainly due to the recognition of a full quarter of interest expense in 2010 versus a partial quarter of interest expense in 2009 as the 2009 Senior Notes were issued in May 2009. The increase in interest expense was offset by $2.7 million of capitalized interest associated with the construction of Jupiter for the three months ended June 30, 2010. There was no capitalized interest for the three months ended June 30, 2009.

Interest and Other Income (Loss), Net

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009			Amount		%
Interest income	$	574	$	170		$	404	237.6%
Other loss, net		-		(364	)		364	100.0%
Total interest and other income (loss), net	$	574	$	(194	)	$	768	395.9%

The increase in interest and other income (loss), net was primarily due to interest earned on certain notes and extinguishment of certain lease financings.

Operating Income


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%
Operating income	$	26,430	$	16,887	$	9,543		56.5%
% of revenue		10.0%		6.7%

Our operating income was $26.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $16.9 million for the same period in 2009. The increase in operating income was significantly impacted by higher gross margin of $12.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, as a result of growth in our services businesses, primarily in our North American businesses, and the reduction of costs associated with leased satellite capacity. The increase in our operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was partially offset by higher SG&A expenses as we increased our efforts in promoting our products and services.

Interest Expense


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%
Interest expense	$	14,493	$	17,727	$	(3,234)		(18.2)%

Interest and Other Loss, Net


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%
Interest income	$	359	$	468	$	(109)		(23.3)%
Other loss, net		-		(1)		1		100.0%

Total interest and other loss, net	$	359	$	467	$	(108)		(23.1)%

The decrease in interest and other loss, net was primarily due to a reduction of interest earned on certain notes.

Income Tax Expense

Three Months Ended June 30,

Variance

Three Months Ended September 30,

Variance

(Dollars in thousands)

2010

2009

Amount

Income tax expense

1,~~563~~551

~~462~~981

~~1,101~~570

~~238.3%~~

58.1%

~~Changes~~Our in income ~~tax~~ tax expense ~~are~~is generally attributable to state income taxes and income earned from certain of our foreign subsidiaries. ~~Our~~For ~~income tax expense for~~ the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, our income tax expense was partially offset by ~~the~~$0.1 ~~income~~million ~~tax~~and ~~benefit of~~ $0.96 million, respectively, of income tax benefit generated by our Indian subsidiary as a result of its engagement in telecommunications infrastructure development. Indian tax law provides for a deduction of 100% of profits and gains derived from qualifying infrastructure businesses for ten consecutive assessment years. This benefit is available to us through the tax assessment year of 2015/2016.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

Revenues

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Services revenues	$	379,045	$	334,566	$	44,479		13.3%
Hardware sales		114,431		160,294		(45,863	)	(28.6)%
Total revenues	$	493,476	$	494,860	$	(1,384	)	(0.3)%
% of revenue to total revenues:
Services revenues		76.8%		67.6%
Hardware sales		23.2%		32.4%

Services Revenues

The increase in services revenues was attributable to our North America Broadband segment. Revenues from our Consumer group increased by $36.1 million to $217.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $181.4 million for the same period in 2009 resulting primarily from the increase in our consumer subscriber base. The increase in the Consumer group was partly due to a larger percentage of our customers utilizing the consumer rental program, for which we recognized $16.1 million and $5.1 million of services revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

In addition, revenue from our North America Enterprise group increased by $13.3 million to $94.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $81.5 million for the same period in 2009. The increase reflected the growth in our managed services business, new contracts awarded in prior periods that provided incremental service revenue in the first quarter of 2010 and the growth in our small/medium and wholesale subscriber base.

Furthermore, services revenue from our International Broadband segment increased by $7.4 million to $64.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $56.6 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to the continued growth of our expanding array of solutions and global services to enterprises and government organizations in Brazil and the Africa/Middle East region. Also, contributing to the increase was $5.5 million as a result of the favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.

Partially offsetting the increase was a decrease in revenue from our Telecom Systems segment of $12.4 million to $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $15.1 million for the same period in 2009, mainly as a result of a significant reduction in revenues from the Telematics group.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009

Revenues


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Services revenues	$	579,754	$	509,871	$	69,883			13.7%
Hardware sales		178,437		235,458		(57,021	)		(24.2)%

Total revenues	$	758,191	$	745,329	$	12,862			1.7%

% of revenue to total revenues:
Services revenues		76.5%		68.4%
Hardware sales		23.5%		31.6%

Services Revenues

The increase in services revenues was attributable to our North America Broadband segment. Revenues from our Consumer group increased by $54.7 million to $334.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $279.6 million for the same period in 2009 resulting primarily from the increase in our consumer subscriber base. The increase in the Consumer group was partly due to a larger percentage of our customers utilizing the consumer rental program, for which we recognized $26.2 million and $10.0 million of services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

In addition, revenue from our North America Enterprise group increased by $21.3 million to $143.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $121.8 million for the same period in 2009. The increase reflected the growth in our managed services business, new contracts awarded in prior periods that provided incremental service revenue in the first quarter of 2010 and the growth in our small/medium and wholesale subscriber base.

Furthermore, services revenue from our International Broadband segment increased by $10.7 million to $98.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $87.7 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to the continued growth of our expanding array of solutions and global services to enterprises and government organizations in Brazil and the Africa/Middle East region. Also, contributing to the increase was $6.2 million as a result of the favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.

Partially offsetting the increase in services revenue was a decrease in revenue from our Telecom Systems segment of $16.8 million to $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $20.8 million for the same period in 2009, mainly as a result of a significant reduction in revenues from the Telematics group.

Hardware Sales

Hardware sales from our North America Broadband segment decreased by $3848.34 million to $3965.72 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 compared to $78113.06 million for the same period in 2009.

Despite the growth in the subscriber base, hardware sales in the Consumer group decreased by $811.17 million to $1318.48 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $2130.5 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to an increase in ~~(i) the~~customers ~~utilization~~utilizing ~~of the consumer rebate program which reduced hardware revenues and~~ (iii) ~~customers utilizing~~ the consumer rental program, which revenues are accounted for as services revenues, instead of the previously offered ~~deferred~~financed purchase plan, which revenues were accounted for as hardware sales and (ii) the consumer rebate programs which reduced hardware revenues.

Hardware revenue from our North America Enterprise group also decreased by $3036.~~2 million~~7 ~~to $26.3~~ million ~~for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared~~ to $5646.54 million for the ~~same period in 2009. The decrease was due to a lower volume of shipments as customers delayed their buying decisions as well as the changes in the~~ ~~product mix where the emphasis on managed services has led to lower upfront hardware revenue and an increase in recurring service revenue.~~

In addition, hardware sales from our International Broadband segment decreased by $11.5 million to $27.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $38.8 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the completion of the rollout of terminal shipments on a multi-year contract for a large lottery operator in the United Kingdom and a decrease in shipment volume to our enterprise customers as delays in customer buying decisions impacting new hardware orders. These decreases were slightly offset by a $0.6 million favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.

Hardware sales from our Telecom Systems segment increased by $3.9 million to $47.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $43.5 million for the same period in 2009, mainly due to the increase in hardware revenue from the Terrestrial Microwave group.

Cost of Revenues

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Cost of services	$	238,856	$	217,638	$	21,218		9.7%
Cost of hardware products sold		116,468		151,488		(35,020	)	(23.1)%
Total cost of revenues	$	355,324	$	369,126	$	(13,802	)	(3.7)%

Cost of Services

Cost of services increased in conjunction with the increase in services revenues, mainly due to the growth in our consumer subscriber base and our managed services businesses in the North America Broadband segment. Support costs for the growth included customer service, wireline and wireless costs, field services, network operations and depreciation expense, which increased by $23.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increases were partially offset by lower transponder capacity lease expense. We expect transponder capacity lease expense for the Consumer group to continue to decrease as more customers are placed on the SPACEWAY network.

In addition, cost of services from our International Broadband segment increased by $8.1 million, primarily due to an increase in the number of enterprise and global service sites in service across Brazil and the Africa/Middle East region. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $9.4 million in cost of services from the Telecom Systems segment to $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $11.4 million for the same period in 2009, mainly related to the Telematics group.

nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $83.1 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to a lower volume of shipments as enterprise customers delayed their buying decisions as well as the changes in the product mix where the emphasis on managed services has led to lower upfront hardware revenue and an increase in recurring service revenue.

In addition, hardware sales from our International Broadband segment decreased by $10.5 million to $44.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $55.2 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the completion of the rollout of terminal shipments in 2009 on a multi-year contract for a large lottery operator in the United Kingdom and a decrease in shipment volume to our international enterprise customers as delays in customer buying decisions which impacted new hardware orders. These decreases were slightly offset by a $0.8 million favorable impact of currency exchange due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.

Hardware sales from our Telecom Systems segment increased by $1.8 million to $68.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $66.7 million for the same period in 2009, mainly due to the increase in hardware revenue from the Mobile Satellite Systems group.

Cost of Revenues


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Cost of services	$	364,662	$	326,532	$	38,130			11.7%
Cost of hardware products sold		174,824		225,134		(50,310	)		(22.3)%

Total cost of revenues	$	539,486	$	551,666	$	(12,180	)		(2.2)%

Cost of Services

Cost of services increased in conjunction with the increase in services revenues, mainly due to the growth in our consumer subscriber base and our managed services businesses in the North America Broadband segment. Support costs for the growth included customer service, wireline and wireless costs, field services, network operations and depreciation expense, which increased by $34.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increases were partially offset by lower transponder capacity lease expense. We expect transponder capacity lease expense for the Consumer group to continue to decrease as more customers are placed on the SPACEWAY network.

In addition, cost of services from our International Broadband segment increased by $11.3 million, primarily due to an increase in the number of enterprise and global service sites in service across Brazil and the Africa/Middle East region. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $12.6 million in cost of services from the Telecom Systems segment to $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $15.8 million for the same period in 2009, mainly related to the Telematics group.

Cost of Hardware Products Sold

Cost of hardware products sold decreased in conjunction with the reduction in hardware sales. The decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease in cost of hardware products sold from our North America Broadband segment of $2839.07 million to $6495.18 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $92135.15 million for the same period in 2009.

Despite the growth in the consumer subscriber base, the cost of hardware products sold in the Consumer group decreased by $917.61 million to $2940.56 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to $3957.17 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to (i) an increase in the number of customers utilizing the consumer rental program, for which hardware cost is accounted for as a component of services cost, instead of the previously offered deferred purchase plan, which cost was accounted for as hardware cost and (ii) a decrease in hardware unit cost as a result of improved manufacturing efficiency.

In44 addition, cost of hardware products sold from our International Broadband segment decreased by $9.2 million to $17.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $26.7 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in hardware sales.

TheTable decrease in cost of hardware products sold was partially offset by the increase of $2.2 million in costs from our Telecom Systems segment resulting from the corresponding increase in hardware cost from the Terrestrial Microwave group. Contents

In addition, cost of hardware products sold from our International Broadband segment decreased by $8.7 million to $29.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $37.9 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in hardware sales.

Furthermore, cost of hardware products sold from our Telecom Systems segment decreased by $1.9 million, primarily related to the reduction in hardware cost from the Telematics group.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	96144,~~082~~747	$	88132,~~098~~302	$	712,~~984~~445	~~9.1%~~	9.4%
% of revenue		19.51%		17.8%

SG&A expense increased mainly due to higher costs of: (i) ~~marketing costs of~~ $610.23 million~~, primarily~~ in our North America operations as we increased targeted marketing spending for our consumer ~~business~~and enterprises businesses and (ii) ~~administrative costs of~~ $13.84 million, ~~primarily~~at ~~related to~~ our ~~North American operations and~~ international subsidiaries for the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. ~~From~~These ~~time~~increases towere ~~time,~~partially weoffset ~~modify~~by ~~our~~lower ~~marketing~~costs ~~strategy~~of to$1.3 ~~attract~~million ~~new~~across ~~customers,~~the ~~which~~other ~~may~~operating ~~impact~~segments ~~our~~of ~~SG&A~~the ~~expense~~company.

Loss on Impairment

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Loss on impairment	$	-	$	44,400	$	(44,400	)	(100.0)%
Loss on impaiment	$	-	$	44,400	$	(44,400	)		(100.0)%
% of revenue		0.0%		96.0%

There was no impairment loss recognized in 2010. In 2009, we recognized $44.4 million of impairment loss, related to the Deposit paid to Sea Launch.

Research and Development

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Research and development	$	1015,~~270~~046	$	1116,~~049~~502	$	(~~779~~1,456	)	~~(7.1)%~~	(8.8)%
% of revenue		2.10%		2.2%

44R&D decreased due to a reduction in development activities of $5.3 million from our North America Broadband segment. This decrease was partially offset by the increase in R&D activities of $2.7 million and $0.9 million related to the construction of Jupiter and our Mobile Satellite Systems group, respectively.

R&D decreased due to a reduction in development activities of $3.4 million from our North America Broadband segment. This decrease was partially offset by the increase in R&D activities of $1.7 million and $0.6 million related to the construction of Jupiter and our Mobile Satellite Systems group, respectively.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Amortization of intangible assets	$	12,~~385~~067	$	24,~~771~~156	$	(12,~~386~~089	)	~~(50.0)%~~	(50.3)%
% of revenue		0.3%		0.6%

Amortization of intangible assets decreased primarily due to the impact of ~~fully depreciated~~ intangible assets reaching inthe ~~2009~~end of their estimated life.

Operating Income (loss)

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%	%
Operating income (loss)	$	3056,~~415~~845	$	(203,~~584~~697)	$	5060,~~999~~542	~~247.8%~~		1637.6%
% of revenue		67.25%		(40.25)%

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we generated $3056.48 million of operating income compared to an operating loss of $203.67 million for the same period in 2009. The change in operating income (loss) was significantly impacted by the recognition of $44.4 million in impairment loss, which was related to the Deposit paid to Sea Launch, in 2009. In addition, our gross margin was higher by $1225.40 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, as a result of growth in our services businesses, primarily in our North American businesses, and the reduction of costs associated with leased satellite capacity. The increase in our operating income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was partially offset by higher SG&A expenses as we increased our efforts in promoting our products and services.

Interest Expense

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Variance
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount			%
Interest expense	$	3146,~~620~~113	$	2947,~~379~~106	$	~~2,241~~(993	)	~~7.6%~~	(2.1)%

Interest expense primarily relates to interest on the 2006 Senior Notes, the 2009 Senior Notes and the Term Loan Facility less capitalized interest associated with the construction of our satellite. The ~~increase~~decrease in interest expense was primarily due to ~~higher~~$8.2 million ~~interest~~of ~~expense~~increased ~~recognized~~capitalized oninterest ~~the~~associated ~~2009~~with ~~Senior Notes for~~ the ~~six~~construction ~~months~~of inJupiter ~~2010 compared to two months~~ in ~~2009 as the 2009 Senior Notes were issued in May 2009~~2010. The ~~increase~~decrease was partially offset by ~~$4.7~~higher ~~million~~interest expense of ~~capitalized~~$6.6 ~~interest~~million ~~associated with~~recognized on the ~~construction~~2009 ofSenior ~~Jupiter~~Notes for the ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~in ~~June 30,~~ 2010. ~~There~~compared ~~was~~to nofive months ~~capitalized~~in ~~interest~~2009 ~~for~~as the ~~six~~2009 ~~months~~Senior ~~ended~~Notes ~~June 30,~~were issued in May 2009.

45Interest and Other Loss, Net


	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009			Amount		%
Interest income	$	1,486	$	865		$	621		71.8%
Other loss, net		-		(365	)		365		100.0%

Total interest and other loss, net	$	1,486	$	500		$	986		197.2%

~~Interest~~The ~~and~~increase ~~Other~~in interest ~~Income~~and ~~(Loss)~~other loss, ~~Net~~net was primarily due to an increase of interest earned on certain notes and the extinguishment of certain lease financings in 2009.

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			Amount			%
Interest income	$	1,127		$	397		$	730		183.9 %
Other loss, net		-			(364	)		364		100.0 %
Total interest and other income (loss), net	$	1,127		$	33		$	1,094		3315.2%
The increase in interest and other income (loss), net was primarily due to interest earned on certain notes and the extinguishment of certain lease financings.
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit
	Six Months Ended June 30,						Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			Amount			%
Income tax (expense) benefit	$	(2,780	)	$	206		$	(2,986	)	(1449.5)%
Changes in income tax (expense) benefit are generally attributable to state income taxes and income earned from certain of our foreign subsidiaries. Our income tax (expense) benefit was partially offset by $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to an offset of $2.1 million for the same period in 2009 of income tax benefit generated by our Indian subsidiary as a result of it being engaged in telecommunications infrastructure development. Indian tax law provides for a deduction of 100% of profits and gains derived from qualifying infrastructure businesses for ten consecutive assessment years. This benefit is available to us through the tax assessment year of 2015/2016.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
	Six Months Ended June 30,						Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			Amount			%
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	42,071		$	55,763		$	(13,692	)	(24.6)%
Investing activities	$	(121,114	)	$	(60,914	)	$	60,200		98.8%
Financing activities	$	(3,610	)	$	131,026		$	(134,636	)	(102.8)%

Income Tax Expense


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Amount		%
Income tax expense	$	4,331	$	775	$	3,556		458.8%

Our income tax expense is generally attributable to state income taxes and income earned from certain of our foreign subsidiaries. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, our income tax expense was partially offset by $0.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of income tax benefit generated by our Indian subsidiary as a result of its engagement in telecommunications infrastructure development. Indian tax law provides for a deduction of 100% of profits and gains derived from qualifying infrastructure businesses for ten consecutive assessment years. This benefit is available to us through the tax assessment year of 2015/2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			Amount			%
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	110,066		$	123,055		$	(12,989	)		(10.6)%
Investing activities	$	(177,013	)	$	(139,836	)	$	37,177			26.6%
Financing activities	$	(4,375	)	$	129,559		$	(133,934	)		(103.4)%

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities

~~The~~Net ~~decrease in net~~ cash provided by operating activities was approximately $110.1 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010. This was ~~primarily~~ due to approximately $44105.48 million ~~impairment~~of ~~loss~~cash ~~recognized~~generated inby ~~2009~~earnings ~~and~~after ~~changes~~adjustments inof ~~our~~non-cash ~~operating~~expenses ~~assets~~plus ~~and~~a ~~liabilities~~net ~~of $32.0 million. The~~ decrease ~~related~~in toworking ~~our~~capital ~~operating~~of ~~assets~~approximately ~~and~~$4.3 ~~liabilities~~million. ~~was~~Net ~~primarily~~cash ~~due~~provided toby ~~our~~operations ~~efforts in managing our~~was ~~cash~~approximately ~~collection~~$123.1 onmillion ~~receivables~~for ~~balance, as evidenced by~~ the ~~improvement~~nine inmonths ~~the~~ended ~~“days sales outstanding” metric to 56 days as of June~~September 30, ~~2010 from 65 days as of June 30~~ 2009~~, and timing for settlement of obligation to vendors~~. ~~The~~ ~~decrease~~This was ~~partially~~due ~~offset~~to byapproximately ~~the increase in our net income of~~ $6268.68 million, ~~prior~~of tocash ~~noncash~~generated ~~depreciation~~by ~~and~~earnings ~~amortization~~after ~~expense,~~adjustment for ~~the~~non-cash ~~six~~expenses ~~months~~plus ~~ended~~a ~~June 30,~~net ~~2010~~decrease ~~compared~~in toworking ~~the~~capital ~~same~~of ~~period in 2009~~$54.3 million.

Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities

The increase in net cash used in investing activities was mainly due to an increase in capital expenditures of $6689.42 million, primarily related to the construction of our Jupiter satellite. ~~and~~The increase was partially offset by a net ~~increase~~decrease in marketable securities of $641.01 million.

4647

Capital expenditures for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown as follows (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		Variance
Capital expenditures:
Jupiter program	$	65104,~~597~~836	$	-16,282	$	6588,~~597~~554
Capital expenditures—VSAT		4869,~~440~~225		4769,~~852~~055		~~588~~170
Capital expenditures—other		57,~~844~~500		46,~~107~~668		~~1,737~~832
Capitalized software		69,~~170~~935		710,~~762~~315		(~~1,592~~380	)
SPACEWAY program		1,~~411~~970		1,~~260~~948		~~151~~22
VSAT operating lease hardware		10		77		(67	)
Total capital expenditures(1)	$	193,466	$	104,268	$	89,198
Total capital expenditures	$	127,472	$	61,058	$	66,414

(1)	Capital expenditures on an accrual basis were $217.3 million and $127.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the net cash used in our financing activities mainly related to the repayment of our long-term and short-term debt and debt issuance costs associated with the refinancing of our revolving credit facility. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, our net cash provided by financing activities was mainly related to the private debt offering of the 2009 Senior Notes in May 2009.

Future Liquidity Requirements

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our Cash and cash equivalents and Marketable securities were $~~128~~127.27 million and our total debt was $719.7 3 million. We are leveraged as a result of our indebtedness.

~~On March 16, 2010, we entered into a credit agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Barclays Capital to amend and restate our senior secured $50 million revolving credit facility (the “~~Revolving Credit Facility~~”). Pursuant~~ to the terms of the agreement, among other changes, the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended to March 16, 2014, subject to an early maturity date of 91 days prior to March 16, 2014 in the event our 2009 and ~~2006 Senior Notes and our~~ Term Loan Facility (as defined below) are not (i) repaid in full or (ii) refinanced with new debt (or amended) with maturities of no earlier than 91 days after March 16, 2014. The terms of the Revolving Credit Facility were amended to be: (i) in respect of the interest rate, at our option, the Alternative Borrowing Rate (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) plus 2.00% or the Adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) plus 3.00% and (ii) in respect of the participation fee for outstanding letters of credit, 3.00% per annum, in each case subject to downward adjustment based on our leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2010, the total outstanding letters of credit and the available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility was $5.3 million and $44.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the Revolving Credit Facility was rated Baa3 and BB- by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), respectively.

InOn ~~May~~March ~~2009~~16, we2010, ~~along~~we ~~with~~entered ~~our~~into ~~subsidiary,~~a ~~HNS~~credit ~~Finance~~agreement ~~Corp.,~~with asJP ~~co-issuer~~Morgan Chase Bank, ~~completed~~ aN.A. ~~private~~and ~~debt~~Barclays ~~offering~~Capital ofto ~~$150.0~~amend ~~million~~and ofrestate ~~9.50%~~our senior ~~notes~~secured ~~maturing~~$50 onmillion ~~April 15,~~revolving ~~2014~~credit facility (the “~~2009~~Revolving ~~Senior~~Credit ~~Notes~~Facility”). Pursuant ~~The~~to ~~2009~~the ~~Senior~~terms ~~Notes~~of ~~are~~the ~~guaranteed~~agreement, onamong aother ~~senior~~changes, ~~unsecured~~the ~~basis~~maturity bydate ~~each~~ of ~~our~~the ~~current~~Revolving ~~and~~Credit ~~future domestic~~Facility ~~subsidiaries~~was ~~that~~extended ~~guarantee~~to ~~any~~March 16, of2014, ~~our~~subject ~~indebtedness~~to oran ~~indebtedness~~early ofmaturity ~~our~~date ~~other~~of ~~subsidiary~~91 ~~guarantors.~~days ~~Interest~~prior onto March 16, 2014 in the event our 2009 and 2006 Senior Notes isand ~~accrued~~our ~~from~~Term ~~April 15,~~Loan ~~2009~~Facility ~~and~~(as isdefined ~~paid~~below) ~~semi-annually~~are not (i) repaid in ~~arrears~~full onor ~~April~~(ii) 15refinanced ~~and October 15~~with new debt (or amended) with maturities of ~~each~~no ~~year,~~earlier ~~beginning~~than on91 ~~October~~days after March 1516, ~~2009~~2014. The Weterms ~~received~~of ~~net~~the ~~proceeds~~Revolving ofCredit ~~approximately~~Facility ~~$133.6~~were ~~million~~amended ~~from~~to be: (i) in respect of the ~~offering.~~interest Werate, ~~have~~at ~~used~~our ~~and~~option, ~~intend~~the toAlternative ~~continue~~Borrowing toRate ~~use~~(as ~~these~~defined ~~net~~in ~~proceeds~~the ~~for~~Revolving ~~general~~Credit ~~corporate~~Facility) ~~purposes,~~plus ~~which~~2.00% ~~could include~~or ~~working~~the ~~capital~~Adjusted London ~~needs,~~Interbank ~~corporate~~Offered ~~development~~Rate ~~opportunities~~(“LIBOR”) (~~which~~as ~~may~~defined ~~include~~in ~~acquisitions~~the Revolving Credit Facility), ~~capital~~plus ~~expenditures~~3.00% and ~~opportunistic~~(ii) in ~~satellite~~respect ~~fleet~~of ~~expansion~~the participation fee for outstanding letters of credit, 3.00% per annum, in each case subject to downward adjustment based on our leverage ratio. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the ~~2009~~total ~~Senior~~outstanding ~~Notes~~letters ~~were~~of ~~rated~~credit B1 and Bthe ~~by Moody’s~~available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility was $4.9 million and ~~S&P~~$45.1 million, respectively. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010, wethe ~~had~~Revolving ~~recorded~~Credit ~~$3.0~~Facility ~~million~~was ofrated ~~accrued~~Baa3 ~~interest~~and ~~payable~~BB- ~~related~~by toMoody’s ~~the~~and ~~2009~~Standard & ~~Senior~~Poor’s ~~Notes~~(“S&P”), respectively.

47In February 2007, we borrowed $115 million from a syndicate of banks pursuant to a senior unsecured credit agreement (the “Term Loan Facility”), which matures on April 15, 2014. The Term Loan Facility is guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by all of our existing and future subsidiaries that guarantee our existing 2006 Senior Notes and the Revolving Credit Facility. The interest on the Term Loan Facility is paid quarterly at Adjusted LIBOR (as defined in the Term Loan Facility) plus 2.50%. To mitigate the variable interest rate risk associated with the Term Loan Facility, we entered into an agreement to swap the Adjusted LIBOR for a fixed rate of 5.12% per annum (the “Swap Agreement”). As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62% per annum and is subject to certain mandatory and optional prepayment provisions and contains negative covenants and events of default, in each case, substantially similar to those provisions contained in the indentures governing the Senior Notes. The remaining net interest payments on the Term Loan Facility are estimated to be approximately $2.2 million for the three months ending December 31, 2010, $8.8 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2011 through 2013 and $3.3 million for the year ending December 31, 2014. As of September 30, 2010, the Term Loan was rated B1 and B by Moody’s and S&P, respectively.

InOur February 2007, we borrowed $115 million from a syndicate of banks pursuant to a senior unsecured credit agreement (the “Term Loan Facility”), which matures on April 15, 2014. The Term Loan Facility is guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by all of our existing and future subsidiaries ~~that guarantee our existing 2006~~ ~~Senior~~primarily ~~Notes~~meet ~~and~~their ~~the~~working ~~Revolving~~capital ~~Credit~~requirements ~~Facility.~~through ~~The~~their ~~interest~~respective onoperations ~~the~~or ~~Term Loan Facility is paid quarterly at Adjusted LIBOR (as defined in~~ the ~~Term~~utilization ~~Loan~~of ~~Facility)~~local ~~plus~~credit 2facilities.~~50%.~~ ToOccasionally, ~~mitigate~~ the ~~variable~~subsidiaries ~~interest~~utilize ~~rate~~temporary ~~risk~~advances ~~associated~~to/from ~~with~~us ~~the Term Loan Facility, we entered into an agreement~~ to ~~swap~~meet ~~the~~temporary ~~Adjusted~~cash ~~LIBOR for a fixed rate of 5~~requirements.~~12% per~~ ~~annum~~Certain ~~(the “Swap Agreement”). As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate~~ of ~~7.62% per annum and is subject to~~ ~~certain~~our ~~mandatory~~foreign ~~and~~subsidiaries ~~optional~~maintain ~~prepayment~~various ~~provisions~~revolving ~~and~~lines ~~contains~~of ~~negative~~credit ~~covenants~~ and ~~events~~term ofloans ~~default,~~funded inby ~~each~~their ~~case,~~respective ~~substantially~~local ~~similar~~banks ~~to those provisions contained~~ in ~~the~~local ~~indentures governing the Senior Notes~~currency. ~~The~~As ~~remaining~~of ~~net interest payments on the Term Loan Facility are estimated to be approximately $4.4 million for the six months ending December~~September 3130, 2010, ~~$8.8 million for each of~~ the ~~years~~aggregate ~~ending~~balance ~~December 31,~~outstanding ~~2011~~under ~~through~~these ~~2013~~loans ~~and~~was $32.37 million. ~~for the year ending~~Our ~~December 31,~~subsidiaries ~~2014.~~may Asbe ofrestricted ~~June 30,~~from ~~2010,~~paying ~~the~~dividends ~~Term~~to ~~Loan~~us ~~was~~under ~~rated~~the B1terms ~~and~~of Bthese ~~by Moody’s and S&P, respectively~~loans.

In April 2006, we issued $450 million of 9.50% senior notes maturing on April 15, 2014 (the “2006 Senior Notes”), which are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by us and each of our current and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee any of our indebtedness or indebtedness of our other subsidiary guarantors. Interest on the 2006 Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15. As of June 30, 2010, we had recorded $8.9 million of accrued interest payable related to the 2006 Senior Notes. As of June 30, 2010, the 2006 Senior Notes were rated B1 and B by Moody’s and S&P, respectively.

Although the terms and covenants with respect to the 2009 Senior Notes are substantially identical to the 2006 Senior Notes, the 2009 Senior Notes were issued under a separate indenture and do not vote together with the 2006 Senior Notes. Each of the indentures governing the 2006 Senior Notes and 2009 Senior Notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”), the agreement governing the amended Revolving Credit Facility and the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility require us to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants: (i) in the case of the indentures, for so long as any Senior Notes are outstanding; (ii) in the case of the amended Revolving Credit Facility, for so long as the amended Revolving Credit Facility is in effect; and (iii) in the case of the Term Loan Facility, for so long as the Term Loan Facility remains outstanding. Negative covenants contained in these agreements include limitations on our ability and/or certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness; issue redeemable stock and subsidiary preferred stock; incur liens; pay dividends or distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; make loans and investments; enter into agreements that restrict distributions from our subsidiaries; sell assets and capital stock of our subsidiaries; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person; and enter into new lines of business. In addition to these negative covenants, the amended Revolving Credit Facility, the indentures governing the Senior Notes and/or the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility contain affirmative covenants that require us to: (i) preserve our businesses and properties; (ii) maintain insurance over our assets; (iii) pay and discharge all material taxes when due; and (iv) furnish the lenders’ administrative agent our financial statements for each fiscal quarter and fiscal year, certificates from a financial officer certifying that no Event of Default or Default has occurred during the fiscal period being reported, litigation and other notices, compliance with laws, maintenance of records and other such customary covenants. Management believes that the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants as of June 30, 2010.

Our subsidiaries primarily meet their working capital requirements through their respective operations or the utilization of local credit facilities. Occasionally, the subsidiaries utilize temporary advances to/from us to meet temporary cash requirements. Certain of our foreign subsidiaries maintain various revolving lines of credit and term loans funded by their respective local banks in local currency. As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate balance outstanding under these loans was $3.2 million. Our subsidiaries may be restricted from paying dividends to us under the terms of these loans.

The Company and its subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and, except for its existing and future subsidiaries that are or will be guarantors of the Senior Notes, the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility, they will have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay amounts due under the Senior Notes, Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility, or to make any funds available to pay those amounts, whether by dividend, distribution, loan or other payment.

~~In July~~Senior ~~2006,~~Notes we entered into an agreement with 95 West Co., Inc. (“95 West Co.”) and its parent, Miraxis License Holdings, LLC (“MLH”), pursuant to which 95 West Co. and MLH agreed to provide a series of coordination agreements allowing the Company to operate SPACEWAY 3 at the 95° West Longitude orbital slot where 95 West Co. and MLH have

48In May 2009, we, along with our subsidiary, HNS Finance Corp., as co-issuer, completed a private debt offering of $150.0 million of 9.50% senior notes maturing on April 15, 2014 (the “2009 Senior Notes”). The 2009 Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of our current and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee any of our indebtedness or indebtedness of our other subsidiary guarantors. Interest on the 2009 Senior Notes is accrued from April 15, 2009 and is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on October 15, 2009. We received net proceeds of approximately $133.6 million from the offering. We have used and intend to continue to use these net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which could include working capital needs, corporate development opportunities (which may include acquisitions), capital expenditures and opportunistic satellite fleet expansion. As of September 30, 2010, the 2009 Senior Notes were rated B1 and B by Moody’s and S&P, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, we had recorded $6.5 million of accrued interest payable related to the 2009 Senior Notes.

In April 2006, we issued $450 million of 9.50% senior notes maturing on April 15, 2014 (the “2006 Senior Notes”), which are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by us and each of our current and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee any of our indebtedness or indebtedness of our other subsidiary guarantors. Interest on the 2006 Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15. As of September 30, 2010, we had recorded $19.6 million of accrued interest payable related to the 2006 Senior Notes. As of September 30, 2010, the 2006 Senior Notes were rated B1 and B by Moody’s and S&P, respectively.

Although the terms and covenants with respect to the 2009 Senior Notes are substantially identical to the 2006 Senior Notes, the 2009 Senior Notes were issued under a separate indenture and do not vote together with the 2006 Senior Notes. Each of the indentures governing the 2006 Senior Notes and 2009 Senior Notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”), the agreement governing the amended Revolving Credit Facility and the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility require us to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants: (i) in the case of the indentures, for so long as any Senior Notes are outstanding; (ii) in the case of the amended Revolving Credit Facility, for so long as the amended Revolving Credit Facility is in effect; and (iii) in the case of the Term Loan Facility, for so long as the Term Loan Facility remains outstanding. Negative covenants contained in these agreements include limitations on our ability and/or certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness; issue redeemable stock and subsidiary preferred stock; incur liens; pay dividends or distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; make loans and investments; enter into agreements that restrict distributions from our subsidiaries; sell assets and capital stock of our subsidiaries; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person; and enter into new lines of business. In addition to these negative covenants, the amended Revolving Credit Facility, the indentures governing the Senior Notes and/or the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility contain affirmative covenants that require us to: (i) preserve our businesses and properties; (ii) maintain insurance over our assets; (iii) pay and discharge all material taxes when due; and (iv) furnish the lenders’ administrative agent our financial statements for each fiscal quarter and fiscal year, certificates from a financial officer certifying that no Event of Default or Default has occurred during the fiscal period being reported, litigation and other notices, compliance with laws, maintenance of records and other such customary covenants. Management believes that the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants as of September 30, 2010.

~~higher~~Other priority rights. Our remaining obligations with 95 West Co. as of June 30, 2010 are subject to conditions in the agreement including our ability to operate SPACEWAY 3 and are $1.0 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2011 through 2016.

In ~~June~~July ~~2009~~2006, we entered into an agreement with ~~SS/L~~95 ~~for~~West ~~the~~Co., ~~construction~~Inc. of(“95 ~~Jupiter~~West Co.”) and ~~have~~its ~~agreed~~parent, toMiraxis ~~make~~License ~~installment~~Holdings, ~~payments~~LLC (“MLH”), pursuant to ~~SS/L~~which ~~upon~~95 ~~the~~West ~~completion~~Co. ofand ~~each~~MLH ~~milestone~~agreed asto ~~set~~provide ~~forth~~a inseries ~~the~~of ~~agreement.~~coordination Inagreements ~~connection~~allowing ~~with~~ the ~~construction~~Company ~~of Jupiter, we entered into a contract with Barrett, whereby Barrett agreed~~ to ~~lease~~operate ~~user~~SPACEWAY ~~beams~~3 ~~and~~at ~~purchase gateways and terminals for~~ the ~~Jupiter~~95° ~~satellite~~West ~~that~~Longitude ~~are~~orbital ~~designed~~slot towhere ~~operate~~95 West ~~in Canada~~Co. Inand ~~April~~MLH ~~2010,~~have wehigher ~~entered~~priority rights. ~~into~~Our anremaining ~~agreement~~obligations with ~~Arianespace~~95 ~~for~~West ~~the~~Co. ~~launch~~as of ~~Jupiter~~September 30, ~~in the~~2010 ~~first~~are ~~half~~subject ofto ~~2012.~~conditions ~~Pursuant~~in to the agreement, ~~the~~including ~~Ariane~~our 5ability ~~heavy~~to ~~launcher~~operate ~~will~~SPACEWAY ~~launch~~3 ~~Jupiter~~and ~~into~~are ~~geosynchronous~~$1.0 million ~~transfer~~for ~~orbit~~each ~~from~~of ~~Guiana~~the ~~Space~~years ~~Centre~~ending ~~in Kourou, French Guiana. As of June~~December 3031, ~~2010, our obligation for the construction~~2011 ~~and~~through ~~launch of Jupiter was approximately $274~~2016.8 ~~million.~~

In June 2009, we entered into an agreement with SS/L for the construction of Jupiter and have agreed to make installment payments to SS/L upon the completion of each milestone as set forth in the agreement. In connection with the construction of Jupiter, we entered into a contract with Barrett, whereby Barrett agreed to lease user beams and purchase gateways and terminals for the Jupiter satellite that are designed to operate in Canada. In April 2010, we entered into an agreement with Arianespace for the launch of Jupiter in the first half of 2012. Pursuant to the agreement, the Ariane 5 will launch Jupiter into geosynchronous transfer orbit from Guiana Space Centre in Kourou, French Guiana. As of September 30, 2010, our remaining obligation for the construction and launch of Jupiter was approximately $259.9 million.

On October 29, 2010, the Company entered into a $115 million loan agreement with BNP Paribas and Societe Generale to finance the launch related costs for Jupiter, our next generation, high-throughput, Ka-band satellite. The loan will be guaranteed by COFACE, the French Export Credit Agency. Arianespace has been contracted by the Company to launch Jupiter, the estimated launch date being in the first half of 2012.

Loan draw-downs, which will begin in the fourth quarter, will occur over the construction period for the launch vehicle up to the time of the launch. Terms of the loan include a fixed interest rate of 5.13% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears, and a repayment period of 8.5 years after the launch. The agreement also contains covenants and conditions which are customary for financings of this type.

Based on our current and anticipated levels of operations and conditions in our markets and industry, we expect to meet our short-term cash requirements through the use of cash on hand and cash from operations that we expect to generate. We expect to meet our long-term cash requirements through a combination of (i) cash on hand and cash from operations that we expects to generate and (ii) a possible refinancing of our senior notes and/or term loan that mature in 2014. We believe that our current resources are sufficient to meet our short-term cash requirements. We do not currently anticipate accessing the $50 million Revolving Credit Facility. However, our ability to fund these needs and to comply with the financial covenants under our debt agreements depends on our future operating performance and cash flow, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions, the level of spending by our customers and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Any future acquisitions, joint ventures, acquisition of a satellite, or other similar transactions will likely require additional capital and there can be no assurance that any such capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations since December 31, 2009, as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, except for items listed below:

•

On March 16, 2010, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Barclays Capital to amend and restate our senior secured $50 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). See the Future Liquidity Requirements section for a discussion of the Revolving Credit Facility.

• In April 2010, we entered into an agreement with Arianespace for the launch of Jupiter in the first half of 2012. Pursuant to the agreement, the Ariane 5 ~~heavy launcher~~ will launch Jupiter into geosynchronous transfer orbit from Guiana Space Centre in Kourou, French Guiana.

Commitments and Contingencies

For a discussion of commitments and contingencies, see Note 17—Commitments and Contingencies to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I-Item 1 of this report.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are required to issue standby letters of credit and bonds primarily to support certain sales of our equipment to international government customers. These letters of credit are either bid bonds to support contract bids, or to support advance payments made by customers upon contract execution and prior to equipment being shipped, or guarantees of performance issued in support of its warranty obligations. Bid bonds typically expire upon the issue of the award by the customer. Advance payment bonds expire upon receipt by the customer of equipment, and performance bonds typically expire when the warranty expires, generally one year after the installation of the equipment.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we had $23.52 million of ~~contractual~~ contractual obligations to customers and other statutory/governmental agencies, which were secured by letters of credit issued through us and our subsidiaries’ credit facilities. Of this amount, $54.39 million was issued under the Revolving Credit Facility; $1.6 million was secured by restricted cash; $1.0 million related to insurance bonds; and $15.67 million was issued under credit arrangements available to our Indian and Brazilian subsidiaries. Certain letters of credit issued by our ~~Indian~~ foreign subsidiaries are secured by ~~their~~certain assets.

Seasonality

Like many communications infrastructure equipment vendors, a significant amount of our hardware sales occur in the second half of the year due to our customers’ annual procurement and budget cycles. Large enterprises and operators usually allocate their capital expenditure budgets at the beginning of their fiscal year (which often coincides with the calendar year). The typical sales cycle for large complex system procurements is 6 to 12 months, which often results in the customer expenditure occurring towards the end of the year. Customers often seek to expend the budgeted funds prior to the end of the year and the next budget cycle. As a result, interim results are not indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Inflation

Historically, inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. For a description of our critical accounting policies, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” as included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2010 (File number 333-138009).

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements, see Note 1—Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I-Item 1 of this report.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following discussion and the estimated amounts generated from the sensitivity analyses referred to below include forward-looking statements of market risk which assume for analytical purposes that certain adverse market conditions may occur. Actual future market conditions may differ materially from such assumptions because the amounts shown below are the result of analyses used for the purpose of assessing possible risks and the mitigation thereof. Accordingly, you should not consider the forward-looking statements as projections by us of future events or losses.

General

Our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and changes in the market value of our equity investments. We manage our exposure to those market risks through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We enter into derivative instruments only to the extent considered necessary to meet our risk management objectives and do not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes.

Foreign Currency Risk

We generally conduct our business in United States dollars. However, as our international business is conducted in a variety of foreign currencies, it is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our objective in managing our exposure to foreign currency changes is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Accordingly, we may enter into foreign exchange contracts to mitigate risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency transactions. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we had an estimated $11.9 million of foreign currency denominated receivables and payables outstanding, and $5.0 million of hedge contracts in place to partially mitigate foreign currency risk. The differences between the face amount of the foreign exchange contracts and their estimated fair values were not material as of September 30, 2010.

50The impact of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in exchange rates on the fair value of foreign currency denominated net assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries would be an estimated loss of $7.7 million as of September 30, 2010.

estimated $11.3 million of foreign currency denominated receivables and payables outstanding, and $0.5 million of hedge contracts in place to partially mitigate foreign currency risk. The differences between the face amount of the foreign exchange contracts and their estimated fair values were not material as of June 30, 2010.

The impact of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in exchange rates on the fair value of foreign currency denominated net assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries would be an estimated loss of $7.2 million as of June 30, 2010.

Marketable Securities Risk

We have a significant amount of cash that is invested in marketable securities which is subject to market risk due to interest rate fluctuations. We have established an investment policy which governs our investment strategy and stipulates that we diversify investments among United States Treasury securities and other high credit quality debt instruments that we believe to be low risk. We are averse to principal loss and seek to preserve our invested funds by limiting default risk and market risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Our Senior Notes and outstanding borrowings related to very small aperture terminal hardware financing arrangements are not subject to interest rate fluctuations because the interest rate is fixed for the term of the instrument. We are subject to variable interest rates on certain other debt including the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan Facility. To the extent we draw against the credit facility, increases in interest rates would have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

To mitigate the variable interest rate risk associated with the Term Loan Facility, we entered into the Swap Agreement to swap the variable LIBOR based interest on the Term Loan Facility for a fixed interest rate of 5.12% per annum. The remaining net interest payments based on the Swap Agreement and the Term Loan Facility are paid quarterly and estimated to be approximately $42.42 million for the ~~six~~three months ending December 31, 2010, $8.8 million for each of the years ending ~~December 31, 2011 through 2013 and $3.3 million for the year ending December 31, 2014. The security for~~ our interest obligation under the Swap Agreement is the same as the security for the Revolving Credit Facility described in Note 8—Debt to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I-Item 1 in this report.

December 31, 2011 through 2013 and $3.3 million for the year ending December 31, 2014. The security for our interest obligation under the Swap Agreement is the same as the security for the Revolving Credit Facility described in Note 8—Debt to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I-Item 1 in this report.

Market Concentration and Credit Risk

We provide services and extend credit to a number of equipment customers, service providers, and a large number of consumers, both in the United States and around the world. We monitor our exposure to credit losses and maintain, as necessary, allowances for anticipated losses. Financial instruments which potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents and marketable investments. Although we maintain cash balances at financial institutions that exceed federally insured limits, these balances are placed with high credit quality financial institutions.

Commodity Price Risk

All of our products contain components whose base raw materials have undergone dramatic cost fluctuations in the last 24 months. Fluctuations in pricing of raw materials have the ability to affect our product costs. Although we have been successful in offsetting or mitigating our exposure to these fluctuations, such changes could have an adverse impact on our product costs. We are unable to predict the possible impact of changes in commodity prices.

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has evaluated, with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in such rules) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Our management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all frauds. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company continues to review its disclosure controls and procedures, including its internal controls over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that the Company’s systems evolve with its business.

5253

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

On June 22, 2009, Sea Launch filed a voluntary petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. As a result of this filing, our efforts to pursue collection of the arbitral award from Sea Launch were stayed under the bankruptcy laws. On May 27, 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement with Sea Launch to resolve the claim that we filed in the Sea Launch bankruptcy (the “Settlement Agreement”). The Settlement Agreement provides that Sea Launch will irrevocably issue to us two credits, each in the amount of $22.2 million (the “Credits”), in satisfaction and discharge of our bankruptcy claim. The Credits may be used by us to defray the cost of up to two launches contracted by December 31, 2015, and scheduled to occur by December 31, 2017. In addition, subject to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, one or both Credits may be transferred to third parties. The bankruptcy court has approved the Settlement Agreement, and its terms have been incorporated into the court’'s order approving Sea Launch’'s plan of reorganization. The Settlement Agreement ~~will~~became ~~become~~ effective ~~upon~~on ~~the effectiveness of the plan of reorganization~~October 27, ~~which is expected to occur later in~~ 2010.

On December 18, 2009, the Company and HCI received notice of a complaint filed in the Cook County, Illinois, Circuit Court by a former subscriber to the HughesNet service. The complaint seeks a declaration allowing the former subscriber to file a class arbitration challenging early termination fees under the subscriber agreement. Based on our investigation, we believe that the allegations in this complaint are not meritorious and we intend to vigorously defend this matter.

No other material legal proceedings have commenced or been terminated during the period covered by this report.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

For a discussion of the risk factors affecting the Company, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with respect to the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

5354

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.

Other Information

~~None.~~On October 29, 2010, the Company entered into a $115 million COFACE Covered Export Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with BNP Paribas and Société Générale, as original lenders and mandated lead arrangers, BNP Paribas, as facility agent, documentation agent, and security agent, and Société Générale, as structuring bank to finance the launch of Jupiter, its next generation, high-throughput, Ka-band satellite. Arianespace has been contracted by the Company to launch Jupiter, which is expected to occur in the first half of 2012.

The Credit Agreement will be guaranteed by COFACE, the French Export Credit Agency. In addition, the borrowings under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed on a by all existing and future domestic subsidiaries of the Company. The Credit Agreement has a fixed interest rate of 5.13% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears, and a repayment period of 8.5 years starting after the launch. Loan draw-downs will occur over the Jupiter launch vehicle construction period up to time of the launch. The Credit Agreement contains covenants and conditions customary for financings of this type.

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description
10.1**		Launch Services Agreement by and between Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Arianespace dated April 30, 2010.
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hughes Network Systems, LLC pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hughes Network Systems, LLC pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Hughes Network Systems, LLC pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Filed herewith.

**55 ~~Filed herewith and portions of the agreement have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request.~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 4, 2010	HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
Date: November 4, 2010	HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
	(Registrant)
	/s/ PRADMAN P. KAUL
	Name:	Pradman P. Kaul
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
	/s/ GRANT A. BARBER
	/S/ GRANT A. BARBER
	Name:	Grant A. Barber
	Title:	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

5556

Table of Contents

TheTable decrease in cost of hardware products sold was partially offset by the increase of $2.2 million in costs from our Telecom Systems segment resulting from the corresponding increase in hardware cost from the Terrestrial Microwave group. Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · Hughes Network Systems, LLC