UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period to

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-23383

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


LOUISIANA		72-1395273
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4500 N.E. EVANGELINE THRUWAY CARENCRO, LOUISIANA		70520
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (337) 896-6664

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨x No x¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~August~~September 252, 2010, there were 22,815,198 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2010

INDEX

			PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Item 1	Financial Statements
		Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	3
		Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	4
		Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - For the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	4
		Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) - For the three-month period ended March 31, 2010	5
		Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) - For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010	5
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	6
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	6
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
	Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	21
	Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	25
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	21
	Item 4	Controls and Procedures	25
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION			2326
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	23
	Item 1	Legal Proceedings	26
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2426
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds	24
	Item 2	Unregistered Sale of Securities and Use of Proceeds	26
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	24
	Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	26
	Item 4.	Reserved	24
	Item 4	Reserved	26
	Item 5.	Other Information	24
	Item 5	Other Information	26
	Item 6.	Exhibits	24
	Item 6	Exhibits	26
		SIGNATURES	2527

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, 2009			~~March~~June 3130, 2010
	(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
				(unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,931		$	~~1,821~~676
Trade receivables, net		15,016			1823,~~203~~824
Other receivables		578			~~222~~65
Parts and supplies inventory		6,811			67,~~953~~697
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4,638			32,~~512~~787
Deferred tax assets		66			1,~~020~~224
Due from related party		131			131
Assets held for sale		736			736
Total current assets		29,907			3237,~~598~~140
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net		72,144			69,~~774~~090
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill		6,586			6,586
Customer intangible assets, net		3,539			35,387
Licenses, permits and other intangible assets, net		9,424			98,~~200~~992
Loan closing costs, net		3,758			3,~~534~~244
Other assets		286			~~306~~282
Total other assets		23,593			2324,~~013~~491
TOTAL ASSETS	$	125,644		$	~~125~~130,~~385~~721
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	3,911		$	6,~~669~~027
Accrued expenses		5,817			48,~~173~~774
Line of credit		—			601,741
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases		11,881			1213,~~018~~937
Insurance notes payable		248			~~125~~—
Total current liabilities		21,857			2330,~~045~~479
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities		33,731			3331,~~020~~333
Other long-term liabilities		172			80—
Deferred tax liabilities		18,449			18,~~449~~874
Total long-term liabilities		52,352			5150,~~549~~207
Total liabilities		74,209			7480,~~594~~686
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Convertible preferred stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 29 and 0 shares of Series B issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively, and 5,396 shares of Series C issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share		1,074			1,045
Convertible preferred stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 29 and 0 shares of Series B issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively, and 5,396 shares of Series C issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share		1,074			1,045
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized; 20,980,202 and 21,325,648 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively		209			213
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized; 20,980,202 and 22,782,891 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively		209			227
Preferred stock dividends declared		3			—
Additional paid-in capital		100,887			101,~~300~~726
Accumulated deficit		(50,738	)		(5152,~~767~~963	)
Total stockholders’ equity		51,435			50,~~791~~035
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	125,644		$	~~125~~130,~~385~~721

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2009			2010			2009			2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
	(Restated)						(Restated)
Operating revenue
Services	$	2527,~~981~~102		$	2023,~~129~~805		$	53,083		$	43,934
Rentals		85,~~923~~499			67,~~716~~641			14,422			14,357
Total operating revenue		3432,~~904~~601			2631,~~845~~446			67,505			58,291
Operating expenses:
Direct costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
Services		18,~~189~~308			1618,~~099~~535			36,496			34,634
Rentals		43,~~458~~118			3,~~438~~692			7,577			7,130
Depreciation and amortization		3,~~337~~443			3,~~412~~431			6,780			6,843
General and administrative expenses		7,~~371~~156			45,~~623~~592			14,527			10,215
Total operating expenses		3332,~~355~~025			2731,~~572~~250			65,380			58,822
Operating income (loss)		1,549			(727	)
Impairment of fixed assets		73			—			73			—
Interest expense		(959	)		(1,156	)
Operating income (loss)		503			196			2,052			(531	)
Other income, net		6			20
Interest expense		(618	)		(1,092	)		(1,577	)		(2,248	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		596			(1,863	)
Other income (expense), net		(8	)		3			(2	)		23
(Provision) benefit for income taxes		(784	)		954
Income (loss) before (provision) benefit for income taxes		(123	)		(893	)		473			(2,756	)
Net loss		(188	)		(909	)
(Provision) benefit for income taxes		(205	)		(182	)		(989	)		772
Dividends on preferred stock		(120	)		(120	)
Net loss		(328	)		(1,075	)		(516	)		(1,984	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(308	)	$	(1,029	)
Dividends on preferred stock		(121	)		(121	)		(241	)		(241	)
Basic income (loss) per share:
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(449	)	$	(1,196	)	$	(757	)	$	(2,225	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)
Basic loss per share:
Diluted income (loss) per share:
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.10	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)
Diluted loss per share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.10	)
Basic		20,577			21,014
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Diluted		20,658			21,014
Basic		20,712			21,821			20,653			21,420
Diluted		20,712			21,821			20,653			21,420

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENTS~~STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE ~~THREE~~SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2010

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share amounts)


	Preferred Stock						Common Stock
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
	(in thousands, except share amounts)
BALANCE, December 31, 2009		5,425		$	1,074			20,980,202		$	209
— Stock based compensation		—			—			—			—
— Restricted stock awards		—			—			95,000			1
— Stock options and warrants exercised for cash and other		—			—			1,376,746			14
— Common stock issued for note modifications		—			—			330,943			3
— Preferred stock dividends declared		—			—			—			—
— Preferred stock and dividends cancelled		(29	)		(29	)		—			—
— Net loss		—			—			—			—

BALANCE, June 30, 2010		5,396		$	1,045			22,782,891		$	227


	Preferred Stock Dividends Declared			Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
	(in thousands)
BALANCE, December 31, 2009	$	3		$	100,887		$	(50,738	)	$	51,435
— Stock based compensation		—			483			—			483
— Restricted stock awards		—			(1	)		—			—
— Stock options and warrants exercised for cash and other		—			201			—			215
— Common stock issued for note modifications		—			124			—			127
— Preferred stock dividends declared		—			—			(241	)		(241	)
— Preferred stock and dividends cancelled		(3	)		32			—			—
— Net loss		—			—			(1,984	)		(1,984	)

BALANCE, June 30, 2010	$	—		$	101,726		$	(52,963	)	$	50,035

	Preferred Stock						Common Stock
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
BALANCE, December 31, 2009		5,425		$	1,074			20,980,202		$	209
— Stock based compensation		—			—			—			—
— Restricted stock awards		—			—			95,000			1
— Common stock issued for note modifications		—			—			250,446			3
— Preferred stock dividends declared		—			—			—			—
— Preferred stock and dividends cancelled		(29	)		(29	)		—			—
— Net loss		—			—			—			—
BALANCE, March 31, 2010		5,396		$	1,045			21,325,648		$	213
	Preferred StockDividendsDeclared			AdditionalPaid-In Capital			AccumulatedDeficit			Total
BALANCE, December 31, 2009	$	3		$	100,887		$	(50,738	)	$	51,435
— Stock based compensation		—			258			—			258
— Restricted stock awards		—			(1	)		—			—
— Common stock issued for note modifications		—			124			—			127
— Preferred stock dividends declared		—			—			(120	)		(120	)
— Preferred stock and dividends cancelled		(3	)		32			—			—
— Net loss		—			—			(909	)		(909	)
BALANCE, March 31, 2010	$	—		$	101,300		$	(51,767	)	$	50,791

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2009			2010
	(in thousands)
	(Restated)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(~~188~~516	)	$	(~~909~~1,984	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		36,~~337~~780			36,~~412~~843
Amortization of deferred loan issuance costs		~~289~~578			~~416~~707
(Gain) loss on fixed asset dispositions		16			(20	)
Loss (gain) on fixed asset dispositions		217			(73	)
Stock based compensation expense		398			258
Provision for doubtful accounts		1,279			(4	)
Other		13			9
Stock based compensation expense		825			483
Provision for doubtful accounts		64			(7	)
Stock issued in legal settlement		112			—
Deferred income taxes		769			(954	)
Accretion of discount on convertible notes and other		25			7
Deferred income taxes		974			(733	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		810,~~889~~503			(38,~~180~~069	)
Other receivables		~~607~~299			~~356~~514
Parts and supplies inventory		~~453~~1,320			(~~142~~531	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		12,~~542~~131			12,~~126~~059
Other assets		—(38	)		(162	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(57,~~435~~358	)		34,~~448~~482
Other long term liabilities		(~~100~~200	)		(~~100~~180	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1016,~~654~~931			3,~~697~~519
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(~~935~~1,292	)		(~~387~~1,549	)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment		82307			~~182~~479
Decrease in restricted cash		942			—
Investment in restricted cash		(350	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		89			(205	)
Return of restricted cash		942			—
Net cash used in investing activities		(393	)		(1,070	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on long-term debt and insurance notes		(69,~~391~~808	)		(35,~~477~~354	)
Principal payments on line of credit		(5170,~~035~~102	)		(6023,879	)
Borrowings on line of credit		4663,~~234~~561			~~120~~25,620
Loan closing costs		—			(65	)
Loan amendment costs		—			(65	)
Preferred stock dividends paid in cash		(~~122~~363	)		(~~120~~241	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(11,314	)		(3,602	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants		—			215
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(571	)		(110	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(16,712	)		(3,704	)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(174	)		(1,255	)
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period		2,043			1,931
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	1,~~472~~869		$	~~1,821~~676
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
Cash paid for interest	$	~~635~~1,286		$	~~701~~1,411
Cash paid for taxes	$	~~765~~798		$	—
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:
Equipment financed through capital lease	$	—		$	446
Stock issued in satisfaction of note payable	$	350		$	—
Preferred stock and dividends cancelled	$	—		$	32
Common stock issued in exchange for note modifications	$	—		$	127
Payables issued to former owners for the acquisition of Keeton Services, Inc. and Griswold Management, Inc.	$	—		$	3,500
Preferred stock and dividends cancelled	$	—		$	32
Equipment financed through capital lease	$	—		$	924

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The financial statements included herein, which have not been audited pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods on a basis consistent with the annual audited statements. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period of a full year. Certain information, accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on August 26, 2010.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

We review our long lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”). If the carrying amount of the asset, including any intangible assets associated with that asset, exceeds its estimated undiscounted net cash flow, before interest, we will recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between its carrying amount and its estimated fair value. There was no impairment recognized during the ~~quarter~~three or six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 or 2009.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

We consider highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

We follow the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), which requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. The cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award).

~~ACCOUNTING~~AUTHORITATIVE ~~PRONOUNCEMENTS~~LITERATURE ~~RECENTLY~~NOT YET ADOPTED

InOn ~~May~~March ~~2009~~30, 2010, the ~~FASB~~President ~~issued~~of athe ~~standard~~United ~~regarding~~States ~~subsequent~~signed ~~events~~the ~~that~~Health ~~provides~~Care ~~guidance~~and asEducation toReconciliation ~~when~~Act anof ~~entity~~2010, ~~should~~which ~~recognize~~is ~~events or transactions occurring after~~ a ~~balance~~reconciliation ~~sheet~~bill ~~date~~that inamends ~~its~~the ~~financial~~Patient ~~statements~~Protection and ~~the~~Affordable ~~necessary~~Care ~~disclosures~~Act ~~related to these events. Specifically, the entity should recognize subsequent events~~ that ~~provide~~was ~~evidence~~signed ~~about conditions~~by ~~that existed at~~ the ~~balance~~President ~~sheet~~on ~~date~~March 23, ~~including significant estimates used to prepare financial statements~~2010. ~~Originally,~~We ~~this~~are ~~standard~~currently ~~required~~awaiting ~~entities~~guidance tofrom ~~disclose~~ the ~~date~~FASB ~~through which subsequent events had been evaluated~~ and ~~whether that~~SEC ~~date~~related ~~was~~to the ~~date~~implications ~~the~~of ~~financial~~this ~~statements~~new legislation ~~were~~on ~~issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We adopted this~~ accounting ~~standard effective June 30, 2009~~ and ~~applied~~disclosure ~~its provisions prospectively~~requirements. ~~In February 2010,~~We ~~the~~expect ~~FASB~~that ~~modified~~ this ~~standard~~legislation towill ~~eliminate~~have ~~the requirement for~~ an ~~SEC~~impact ~~filing~~on ~~entity~~our tofinancial ~~disclose~~position, ~~the~~results ~~date~~of ~~through~~operations ~~which~~and ~~subsequent~~cash ~~events~~flows, ~~have~~but ~~been~~we ~~evaluated.~~cannot ~~Therefore,~~determine wethe ~~omitted~~extent of the ~~disclosure~~impact inat this ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of March 31, 2010~~time.

In January 2010, the FASB issued “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (Topic 820)” which clarified the disclosure requirements of existing U.S. GAAP related to fair value measurements. This standard requires additional disclosures about recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements as follows: (1) for transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, as those terms are currently defined in existing authoritative literature, a reporting entity is required to disclose the amount of the movement between levels and an explanation for the movement; (2) for activity at Level 3, primarily fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs, a reporting entity is required to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, as opposed to presenting such transactions on a net basis; (3) in the event of a disaggregation, a reporting entity is required to provide fair value measurement disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities; and (4) a reporting entity is required to provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for items that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. These disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements for which disclosure becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(unaudited)

AUTHORITATIVE LITERATURE NOT YET ADOPTED

On March 30, 2010, the President of the United States signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which is a reconciliation bill that amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was signed by the President on March 23, 2010. We are currently awaiting guidance from the FASB and SEC related to the implications of this new legislation on accounting and disclosure requirements. We expect that this legislation will have an impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, but we cannot determine the extent of the impact at this time.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

We have reclassified our reporting of gains and losses from the disposal of fixed assets from other income and expense to income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to conform to the current period presentation.

NOTE 2. RESTATEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed on August 26, 2010, the financials as of and for the three ~~month~~and ~~period~~six ~~ended~~month ~~March~~periods ended June 3130, 2009 have been restated to reflect certain contingent obligations associated with certain subordinated promissory notes recorded as compensation for services in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 95-8 “Accounting for Contingent Consideration Paid to the Shareholders of an Acquired Enterprise in a Purchase Business Combination” (“EITF 95-8”) rather than purchase price consideration, as originally presented. Accordingly, goodwill and other intangibles initially recorded were likewise revised as a result of the reduction in purchase price that was replaced by compensation for services recorded during the period of the required contingent employment of the shareholders of the acquired entities. The effect on the previously filed financial statements is included below:

	For the three months ended March 31, 2009
	Three months ended June 30, 2009
	As PreviouslyReported			Adjustment			As Restated
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating expenses
General and administrative expense (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately above)	$	6,~~172~~527		$	~~1,199~~629		$	7,~~371~~156
Operating income (loss)		21,~~764~~132			(~~1,215~~629	)		~~1,549~~503
Interest expense		(~~1,040~~683	)		8165			(~~959~~618	)
Income (loss) before taxes		~~1,714~~441			(~~1,118~~564	)		~~596~~(123	)
Income tax expense		(~~784~~205	)		—			(~~784~~205	)
Net income (loss)		~~930~~236			(~~1,118~~564	)		(~~188~~328	)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	~~810~~115		$	(~~1,118~~564	)	$	(~~308~~449	)
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	0.0401		$	(0.0603	)	$	(0.02	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	0.0401		$	(0.0603	)	$	(0.02	)
	Six months ended June 30, 2009
	As PreviouslyReported			Adjustment			As Restated
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating expenses
General and administrative expense (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately above)	$	12,699		$	1,828		$	14,527
Operating income (loss)		3,880			(1,828	)		2,052
Interest expense		(1,723	)		146			(1,577	)
Income (loss) before taxes		2,155			(1,682	)		473
Income tax expense		(990	)		1			(989	)
Net income (loss)		1,165			(1,681	)		(516	)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	924		$	(1,681	)	$	(757	)
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	0.04		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.04	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	0.04		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.04	)
Number of weighted average shares:
Basic		20,~~577~~653			—			20,~~577~~653
Diluted		2420,~~226~~717			(~~3,568~~64	)		20,~~658~~653

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment, net, consists of the following at December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, respectively:

	December 31,2009			~~March~~June 3130,2010
	(In thousands)
Land	$	493		$	~~493~~472
Building and improvements		8,874			8,~~874~~709
Drilling, field and support equipment		108,393			~~109~~110,~~524~~969
Shop equipment		742			~~819~~854
Office equipment		2,389			2,~~405~~419
Vehicles		4,404			4,~~424~~450
Construction in progress		1,202			~~581~~1,261
		126,497			~~127~~129,~~120~~134
Less: accumulated depreciation		(54,353	)		(5760,~~346~~044	)
Total property, plant and equipment, net	$	72,144		$	69,~~774~~090

NOTE 4. LONG-TERM DEBT AND LINE OF CREDIT

At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, long-term debt consists of the following:

	December 31,2009			~~March~~June 3130,2010
	(In thousands)
Notes payable to a bank with interest payable at prime plus 1.50% (4.75% at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010) maturing July 31, 2023, secured by real estate	$	1,183		$	1,167
Notes payable to a bank with interest payable at prime plus 1.50% (4.75% at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010) maturing July 31, 2023, secured by real estate	$	1,183		$	1,152
Promissory notes payable to certain former owners of acquired companies with interest at 5%, maturing at various dates through April 2013		2,000			~~2,000~~474
Convertible promissory notes payable to certain former stockholders of acquired companies with interest at 5%, maturing at various dates through April 2013		4,133			5,349
Promissory note payable to certain former owners of acquired companies with interest at 6%, maturing June 2013		—			1,750
Promissory notes payable to finance companies secured by vehicles and equipment		329			286
Convertible promissory notes payable to certain former stockholders of acquired companies with interest at 5%, maturing at various dates through April 2013		4,133			5,404
Capital leases payable to finance companies secured by equipment		1,967			2,236
Promissory notes payable to finance companies secured by vehicles and equipment		329			252
Term Loan payable to a bank, variable interest rate at 30-day LIBOR with 1% floor plus 4.50% (5.50% at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010), secured by various equipment, maturing April 23, 2013		36,000			34,000
Capital leases payable to finance companies secured by equipment		1,967			2,378
Total		45,612		$	45,038
Term Loan payable to a bank, variable interest rate at 30-day LIBOR with 1% floor plus 4.50% (5.50% at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010), secured by various equipment, maturing April 23, 2013		36,000			33,860
Less: current maturities		(11,881	)		(12,018	)
Total		45,612		$	45,270
Long-term debt, less current maturities	$	33,731		$	33,020
Less: current maturities		(11,881	)		(13,937	)
Long-term debt, less current maturities	$	33,731		$	31,333

~~Our~~SENIOR ~~Senior~~CREDIT ~~Credit~~FACILITY Facility consists of a $50.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) and a $20.0 million working capital revolving line of credit (the “Revolver”). Availability under the Revolver is the lower of: (i) $20.0 million or (ii) the sum of eligible accounts receivable and inventory, as defined under the agreement governing the Revolver. The Revolver accrued interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate with a 1% floor plus 4.0% (5.0% at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010), and matures in April 2013. The Revolver is collateralized by accounts receivable and inventory. As of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, we had $0.0 million and $0.1 million outstanding under the Revolver, respectively. Due to the lock-box arrangement and the subjective acceleration clause in the agreements governing the Revolver, the debt under the Revolver has been classified as a current liability as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, as required by ASC 470-10-45 (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 95-22), “Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-box Arrangement.”

~~Under~~Our ~~the~~Senior ~~Term~~Credit ~~Loan,~~Facility ~~the~~consists ~~funding~~of ~~limits~~a ~~are~~$50.0 ~~limited~~million toterm loan (the ~~lesser~~“Term ofLoan”) and a $5020.0 million ~~and 80%~~working ofcapital ~~the~~revolving line ~~orderly~~of ~~liquidation~~credit ~~value~~(the ~~of our equipment~~“Revolver”). InAvailability ~~addition,~~under the ~~Term~~Revolver ~~Loan~~is ~~matures~~the inlower ~~April~~of: ~~2013~~(i) $20.0 ~~and~~million ~~will~~or be(ii) the ~~repaid~~sum ~~quarterly~~of ineligible ~~equal~~accounts ~~payments~~receivable ofand ~~$2.0~~inventory, ~~million.~~as ~~Interest~~defined isunder ~~due~~the ~~monthly~~agreement ingoverning ~~arrears~~the ~~and~~Revolver. ~~accrues~~The Revolver accrued interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate with a 1% floor plus 4.50% (5.500% at December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010)., ~~The~~and ~~Term~~matures ~~Loan~~in ~~contains~~April ~~customary~~2013. ~~financial~~The ~~covenants~~Revolver ~~and~~is ~~limitations~~collateralized onby ~~capital~~accounts ~~expenditures~~receivable and inventory. As of December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we had $360.0 million and $341.07 million outstanding under the ~~Term Loan~~Revolver, respectively. Due to the lock-box arrangement and the subjective acceleration clause in the agreements governing the Revolver, the debt under the Revolver has been classified as a current liability as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, as required by ASC 470-10-45 (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 95-22), “Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-box Arrangement.”

~~During~~Under ~~March~~the ~~2010~~Term Loan, wethe ~~entered~~funding ~~into~~limits anare ~~amendment~~limited ~~and waiver~~ to the ~~Senior~~lesser ~~Credit~~of ~~Facility~~$50.0 ~~The~~million ~~waiver provided~~and 80% ~~relief~~of ~~from~~the ~~violations~~orderly ~~related~~liquidation tovalue of our equipment. In addition, the ~~timely~~Term ~~filing~~Loan ofmatures ~~certain~~in ~~reports~~April ~~with~~2013 ~~the~~and ~~lender~~will be repaid quarterly in equal payments of $2.0 ~~Additionally,~~million. ~~the~~Interest ~~amendment~~is ~~adjusted~~due monthly in arrears and accrues at the ~~required~~30-day ~~covenants~~LIBOR ~~related~~rate towith ~~our~~a ~~leverage~~1% ~~ratio~~floor ~~for~~plus ~~the~~4.5% ~~remainder~~(5.50% ofat ~~the~~December 31, 2009 ~~term~~and ofJune 30, ~~the~~2010). ~~loan~~The Term Loan contains customary financial covenants and limitations on capital expenditures. As aof ~~result~~December 31, ~~at March~~2009 and June 3130, 2010, we ~~were~~had in$36.0 ~~compliance~~million ~~with~~and ~~all~~$34.0 ~~covenants~~million outstanding under the ~~Senior~~Term ~~Credit Facility~~Loan, respectively.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~(unaudited)~~During March 2010, we entered into an amendment and waiver to the Senior Credit Facility. The waiver provided relief from violations related to the timely filing of certain reports with the lender. Additionally, the amendment adjusted the required covenants related to our leverage ratio for the remainder of the term of the loan. At June 30, 2010, we are in compliance with all covenants under the Senior Credit Facility.

CAPITAL LEASES

We have several pieces of equipment which were acquired under capital lease. In 2009 and thus far in 2010, we acquired several pieces of equipment for the Seismic Services and Environmental and Other Services segments under capital leases. These leases have maturity dates ranging from February 2011 to July 2014. The balance of all capital leases payable as of December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 was $2.0 million and $2.24 million, respectively.

The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets held under capital lease was $2.3 million and $0.1 million and $23.83 million and $0.24 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, respectively.

Depreciation expense for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 and 2010 was approximately $0.0 million and $0.1 million, and $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for all assets held under capital lease.

CHARLES HOLSTON NOTES

In connection with the acquisition of BMJ Industrial Investments, L.L.C. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Charles Holston, Inc. (“Holston”) in March 2007, we issued $5.0 million in 5% promissory notes payable to certain Holston owners (“Holston Notes”) which included an employment contingency for $3.3 million of this obligation. This portion of the obligation is being recognized as compensation expense ratably over the three-year contingency period. The remaining $1.7 million of the obligation was recorded as a liability as no contingent employment was required. The Holston Notes consist of three separate notes with $1.0 million maturing in February 2008, $2.0 million maturing in February 2009 and $2.0 million maturing in February 2010. The Holston Notes maturing in 2009 and 2010 are convertible into shares of our common stock at a price of $9.24 per share. Based upon the stock valuation at the time of issuance, no beneficial conversion feature existed. At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Holston Notes had a balance of $2.0 and $1.97 million, respectively.

During February 2010, each of the holders of the Holston Notes signed note modification agreements (“Holston Note Modifications”) whereby the payment terms of the Holston Notes were modified to thirty-five monthly payments of principal and interest of $0.06 million beginning February 28, 2010 and one payment for the balance on January 28, 2013. This modification included the removal of all associated employment contingencies. As a result, the portion of the outstanding obligation in the amount of $0.08 million not previously recorded due to the contingency was included in compensation expense in the first quarter of 2010. At the time of the Holston Note Modifications, we issued an aggregate of 107,334 shares of our unregistered restricted common stock to the holders of the Holston Notes. The restrictions on the shares will lapse at various times prior to the maturity of the Holston Notes and we may, at our option, pay the Holston Note balances prior to the new maturity date without penalty. If payment of the Holston Notes is made prior to the lapse of the periodic restrictions, the remaining restricted shares will be forfeited to us and cancelled. As the shares vest, the expense is recognized as a current period charge to interest expense.

CYPRESS NOTE

In connection with the acquisition of certain assets of Cypress Consulting Services, Inc. d/b/a Cypress Energy Services (“Cypress”) effective in February 2007, we issued $3.0 million in a 5% promissory note payable to a certain Cypress stockholder (“Cypress Note”). The Cypress Note was payable over three years with $1.0 million maturing in February 2008, $1.0 million maturing in February 2009 and $1.0 million maturing in February 2010. In November 2008, as an accommodation to the holder of the Cypress Note, we paid the $1.0 million due in February 2009 in exchange for a discounted payment by $0.1 million. At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Cypress Note had a balance of $1.0 million~~. The~~ ~~principal shareholder of Cypress passed away prior to the maturity date of the Cypress Note. After his death, some uncertainty arose among the minority shareholders of Cypress~~ and ~~the heirs to the principal shareholder’s estate.~~ ~~Consequently, payment on the Cypress Note has not been made~~$0.0 We have filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment with the court seeking guidance on how the final installment on the Cypress Note should be made and to confirm the exact setoff amount to which we are entitled as a result of the breaches of agreements by and between Cypressmillion, ~~affiliates of Cypress, and us~~respectively. ~~See Note 10 for additional information related to the Cypress Note.~~

BAILEY NOTE

In connection with the acquisition of Bailey Operating, Inc. (“BOI”) in June 2007, we issued $0.5 million in a 5% promissory note payable to BOI (“Bailey Note”). The Bailey Note is payable on or before May 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Bailey Note had a balance of $0.5 million.

In January 2010, the holder of the Bailey Note executed a note modification agreement (“Bailey Note Modification”) whereby the payment terms of the Bailey Note were modified to thirty-five monthly payments of principal and interest of $0.015 million beginning May 30, 2010 and one payment for the balance on April 30, 2013. At the time of the Bailey Note Modification, we became obligated to issue an aggregate of 26,832 shares of our unregistered restricted common stock to the holder of the Bailey ~~Note.~~ ~~The restrictions on the shares will lapse at various times prior to the maturity of the Bailey~~ Note ~~and we may, at our option, pay the Bailey Note balance prior to the new maturity date without penalty~~. ~~If payment of the Bailey Note is made prior to the lapse of the periodic restrictions, the remaining restricted shares will be forfeited to us and cancelled.~~ The ~~allocation between current and long-term debt was adjusted in the 2009 financial statements to reflect this modification. The charge related to these shares will be recognized as the~~ restrictions ~~are lifted. As the shares vest, the expense is recognized as a current period charge to interest expense.~~

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~(unaudited)~~ on the shares will lapse at various times prior to the maturity of the Bailey Note and we may, at our option, pay the Bailey Note balance prior to the new maturity date without penalty. If payment of the Bailey Note is made prior to the lapse of the periodic restrictions, the remaining restricted shares will be forfeited to us and cancelled. The allocation between current and long-term debt was adjusted in the 2009 financial statements to reflect this modification. The charge related to these shares will be recognized as the restrictions are lifted. As the shares vest, the expense is recognized as a current period charge to interest expense.

BEG NOTES

In connection with the acquisition of certain assets of B.E.G. Liquid Mud Services, Inc. (“BEG”) in January 2008, we issued $4.0 million of 5% promissory notes payable to certain shareholders of BEG (“BEG Notes”). The BEG Notes were payable over three years with $1.3 million maturing in January 2009, $1.3 million maturing in January 2010 and $1.4 million maturing in January 2011 and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a rate of $3.70 per share under certain circumstances. Based upon the stock valuation at the time of the issuance, no beneficial conversion feature exists. At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the BEG Notes had a balance of $2.7 million and $2.52 million, respectively.

In January 2010, each of the holders of the BEG Notes executed note modification agreements (“BEG Note Modifications”) whereby the payment terms of the BEG Notes were modified to thirty-five monthly payments of principal and interest of $0.08 million beginning January 18, 2010 and one payment for the balance on December 18, 2013. At the time of the BEG Note Modifications, we issued an aggregate of 143,112 shares of our unregistered restricted common stock to the holders of the BEG Notes. The restrictions on the shares will lapse at various times prior to the maturity of the BEG Notes and we may, at our option, pay the note balance prior to the new maturity date without penalty. If payment of the BEG Notes are made prior to the lapse of the periodic restrictions, the remaining restricted shares will be forfeited to us and cancelled. The allocation between current and long-term debt was adjusted in the 2009 financial statements to reflect these modifications. The charge related to these shares will be recognized as the restrictions are lifted. As the shares vest, the expense is recognized as a current period charge to interest expense.

INDUSTRIAL LIFT NOTES

In connection with the acquisition of Industrial Lift Truck and Equipment Co., Inc. (“Industrial Lift”) in April 2008, we issued $4.0 million of promissory notes payable to the shareholders of Industrial Lift (the “ILT Notes”). The ILT Notes are payable over three years with $2.0 million maturing in April 2009, $1.0 million maturing in April 2010 and $0.5 million maturing in April 2011. An employment contingency was included in the ILT Notes requiring the continued employment of one of the former owners of Industrial Lift requiring these notes to be recognized as compensation expense ratably over the three-year contingency period. As a result of the employment contingency, the ILT Notes were not included as a portion of the purchase price of Industrial Lift. The ILT Notes bear interest at a rate of 5% per annum payable in arrears and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a rate of $10.50 per share under certain circumstances. Based upon the stock valuation at the time of the issuance, no beneficial conversion feature exists. An additional note in the amount of $0.5 million, which is non-convertible and non-interest bearing, matures in April 2011. In April 2009, an agreement was reached with the former shareholder of Industrial Lift whereby $0.5 million of the scheduled principal payment due in April 2009 was paid in cash and $0.3 million of the obligation was satisfied through the issuance of 233,333 unregistered restricted shares of our common stock valued at $0.3 million. Additionally, $0.4 million was deposited into an irrevocable trust which was released prior to December 31, 2009. In January 2010, a cash payment in the amount of $0.8 million was made to the holder of the ILT Notes. At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the ILT Notes had a balance of $2.8 million and $21.04 million, respectively.

In March 2010, each of the holders of the ILT Notes signed a note modification agreement (“ILT Note Modification”) whereby the payment terms of $1.0 million of the ILT Notes were modified to thirty-five monthly payments of principal and interest of $0.03 million beginning April 23, 2010 and one payment for the balance on March 23, 2013. This modification included the removal of the associated employment contingencies. As a result, this portion of the outstanding obligation not previously recorded in the amount of $0.3 million was recorded as compensation expense in the first quarter of 2010. This payable is included in the monthly payments of principal and interest of $0.03 million. At the time of the ILT Note Modification, we issued an aggregate of 53,665 shares of our unregistered restricted common stock to the holders of the ILT Notes. The restrictions on the shares will lapse at various times prior to the maturity of the ~~ILT~~notes ~~Notes~~ and we may, at our option, pay the ~~note~~ILT Note balance prior to the new maturity date without penalty. If payment of the ILT Notes is made prior to the lapse of the periodic restrictions, the remaining restricted shares will be forfeited to us and cancelled. The charge related to these shares will be recognized as the restrictions are lifted. The terms and maturity on the $1.0 million of ILT Notes originally maturing in April 2011 remain unchanged. As the shares vest, the expense is recognized as a current period charge to interest expense.

~~INSURANCE~~KEETON ~~NOTES~~NOTE ~~PAYABLE~~

AEffective June 30, ~~portion~~2010, we acquired all of ~~our~~the ~~property~~outstanding common stock of Keeton Services, Inc. and ~~casualty~~Griswold ~~insurance~~Management, ~~premiums~~Inc. ~~are~~(collectively ~~financed~~“Keeton”). ~~through~~In ~~certain~~connection ~~short-term~~with ~~installment~~the ~~loan~~acquisition ~~agreements~~of Keeton, we issued a $1.8 ~~The~~million 6% promissory note ~~insurance~~payable ~~notes~~to ~~are~~the shareholders of Keeton (the “Keeton Note”). The Keeton Note matures on June 15, 2013 and is payable in 36 monthly installments ~~through~~of $0.05 million. At June 30, 2010, ~~and~~the ~~accrue~~Keeton ~~interest~~Note athad 5a balance of $1.~~16%.~~8 million.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~(unaudited)~~INSURANCE NOTES PAYABLE

~~NOTE~~A portion of our property and casualty insurance premiums are financed through certain short-term installment loan agreements. The insurance notes were payable in monthly installments through June 2010 and accrued interest at 5.16%. ~~COMMITMENTS~~The ~~AND~~policies ~~CONTINGENCIES~~serviced by insurance notes were renewed effective July 1, 2010.

NOTE 5. ACQUISITIONS

KEETON SERVICES, INC. AND GRISWOLD MANAGEMENT, INC.

Effective June 30, 2010, we acquired Keeton pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement under which we purchased 100% of the common stock of both entities for the total consideration of approximately $3.5 million, including $1.75 million in cash and $1.75 million in a 6% promissory note payable to the former owners, that matures on June 15, 2013 and is payable in thirty-six (36) monthly installments of $0.05 million . The acquisition was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations”. Keeton provides completion fluids to various customers including E&P companies in the Texas markets in which it operates. We feel this service will complement our fluid service offerings in the markets we serve. Pro-Forma disclosures have not been included as they are not material. The results of Keeton’s operations will be included in our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The property and equipment are amortized over periods ranging from three to ten years with no residual value. The amortizable customer list intangible will be amortized over ten years. The allocation of the purchase price will be adjusted as required asset and liability values are finalized and working capital adjustment provisions are resolved (in thousands):


Accounts receivable	$	735
Inventory and other current assets		644
Property and equipment		937
Customer list		2,151
Deferred income tax liability		(347	)
Current liabilities		(620	)

Purchase price	$	3,500

NOTE 6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

INSURANCE RESERVES

We maintain reserves for workers’ compensation and general liability on our balance sheet based on our judgment and ~~the adjusters’~~ best estimates based on claims incurred. Estimated workers’ compensation and general liability claims are determined by an outside adjuster on a case-by-case basis. We maintain insurance policies for workers’ compensation and general liability claims. These insurance policies carry retention limits or deductibles on a per occurrence basis. The retention limits or deductibles are accounted for in our process for all workers’ compensation and general liability claims. As of December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we have recorded $0.8 million and $01.70 million, respectively, of insurance reserves related to workers’ compensation and general liability claims. We feel that the liabilities we have recorded are appropriate based on the known facts and circumstances and do not expect further losses materially in excess of the amounts already accrued for existing claims.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

We have employment agreements with our executive officers and ~~certain~~some former shareholders of companies we acquired. These agreements generally last two to four years and have renewal provisions at our option.

OTHER CONTINGENCIES

On May 1, 2008, the former owners of Preheat, Inc., which we acquired in February 2006, filed a lawsuit in federal court (the “Federal Suit”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana in Lafayette, Louisiana, against us, our directors, our current Chief Executive Officer, our current Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, one of our investment advisors, and a principal of the investment advisor. The Federal Suit sought, among other things, (i) a declaratory judgment that the Preheat purchase agreement executed in December 2005 is null because of alleged inducement to enter into the purchase agreement by criminal or fraudulent conduct, securities fraud and bad faith breach of the purchase agreement and that one of the former owner’s ERISA rights be clarified, (ii) injunctive relief to halt alleged securities disclosure violations by us and to remove three board members, and (iii) damages resulting from the nullification of the Preheat purchase agreement. The Federal Suit has been dismissed. Subsequent to this dismissal, the former owners of Preheat filed a lawsuit in the 16th Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberia, situated in New Iberia, Louisiana. This lawsuit sought essentially the same relief as requested in the Federal Suit, named many of the same defendants as the Federal Suit, and contained many of the same allegations as the Federal Suit. We, together with the other defendants, filed a motion to dismiss the suit based upon the fact that it was filed in the wrong venue. A ruling was issued dismissing the case on that basis, and a judgment reflecting that ruling has been submitted to the trial judge for signature. At this point, we are unable to assess the ultimate impact of this litigation on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We, together with the other defendants, have filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit and that motion remains pending with the court. We believe the claims against us are without merit and are vigorously contesting the legal action.

On12 June 3, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Wellspring OMNI Holdings Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (“Parent”), and Wellspring OMNI Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, providing for the Merger of Acquisition with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger (the “Merger”) as a subsidiary of Parent. Six purported class action lawsuits have been filed in connection with the Merger in state courts in Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, and two purported class actions were filed in connection with the Merger in the federal district court for the Western District of Louisiana. Each court action named the Company and its directors as defendants, and the state court actions also named Wellspring, Parent and Acquisition. One of the federal actions filed named Parent and Acquisition as defendants. The state court complaints allege, among other things, that the director defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders of the Company by entering into the Merger Agreement, failing to disclose certain information with respect to the Company and failing to maximize shareholder value. The Wellspring entities are claimed to have aided and abetted the alleged fiduciary duty breaches by the directors of the Company. The federal court complaints make substantially the same claims as the state court complaints, but also allege violations of federal law relating to the Company’s proxy statement disclosures. One or more of the complaints seek injunctions against the Merger, rescission of the Merger if it is consummated, imposition of a constructive trust, damages, attorneys’ fees, expenses and other relief. The complaints request class action certification and rulings that the named complainants are representatives of the class. No class has been certified at present. Plaintiffs in certain of the state actions and both federal actions have moved for expedited discovery. The defendants have filed the appropriate motions in the state proceedings to consolidate them into a single proceeding and further to stay such state actions pending the federal court’s consideration of the federal suit. A hearing is set for August 30, 2010, as to the motions filed in state court. Moreover, the defendants are contesting discovery requests made by some of the state plaintiffs. The defendants have also filed a motion in the federal court requesting consolidation of the federal actions, a state of all proceedings until lead plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel are appointed and defendants’ motion to dismiss is resolved, and requesting that outstanding discovery requests be quashed. No hearing date has yet been set regarding this motion. The Company believes that all of the lawsuits that have been filed and the allegations contained therein are without merit, and it, along with the directors of the Company, intends to vigorously defend the lawsuits.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Louisiana. This lawsuit sought essentially the same relief as requested in the Federal Suit, named many of the same defendants as the Federal Suit, and contained many of the same allegations as the Federal Suit. We, together with the other defendants, filed a motion to dismiss the suit based upon the fact that it was filed in the wrong venue. A ruling was issued dismissing the case on that basis, and a judgment reflecting that ruling has been submitted to the trial judge for signature. At this point, we are unable to assess the ultimate impact of this litigation on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We, together with the other defendants, have filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit and that motion remains pending with the court. We believe the claims against us are without merit and are vigorously contesting the legal action.

On June 3, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Wellspring OMNI Holdings Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (“Parent”), and Wellspring OMNI Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Acquisition”), providing for the Merger of Acquisition with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger (the “Merger”) as a subsidiary of Parent. Six purported class action lawsuits have been filed in connection with the Merger in state courts in Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, and two purported class actions were filed in connection with the Merger in the federal district court for the Western District of Louisiana. Each court action named the Company and its directors as defendants, and the state court actions also named Wellspring, Parent and Acquisition. One of the federal actions filed named Parent and Acquisition as defendants. The state court complaints allege, among other things, that the director defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders of the Company by entering into the Merger Agreement, failing to disclose certain information with respect to the Company and failing to maximize shareholder value. The Wellspring entities are claimed to have aided and abetted the alleged fiduciary duty breaches by the directors of the Company. The federal court complaints make substantially the same claims as the state court complaints, but also allege violations of federal law relating to the Company’s proxy statement disclosures. One or more of the complaints seek injunctions against the Merger, rescission of the Merger if it is consummated, imposition of a constructive trust, damages, attorneys’ fees, expenses and other relief. The complaints request class action certification and rulings that the named complainants are representatives of the class. No class has been certified at present. Plaintiffs in certain of the state actions and both federal actions have moved for expedited discovery. The defendants have filed the appropriate motions in the state proceedings to consolidate them into a single proceeding and further to stay such state actions pending the federal court’s consideration of the federal suit. A hearing is set for August 30, 2010, as to the motions filed in state court. Moreover, the defendants are contesting discovery requests made by some of the state plaintiffs. The defendants have also filed a motion in the federal court requesting consolidation of the federal actions, a state of all proceedings until lead plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel are appointed and defendants’ motion to dismiss is resolved, and requesting that outstanding discovery requests be quashed. No hearing date has yet been set regarding this motion. The Company believes that all of the lawsuits that have been filed and the allegations contained therein are without merit, and it, along with the directors of the Company, intends to vigorously defend the lawsuits.

In the normal course of our business, we become involved in various litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages, personal injuries and other matters. While we believe we have meritorious defenses against these claims, management has used estimates in determining our potential exposure and has recorded reserves in our financial statements related thereto where appropriate. It is possible that a change in our estimates of that exposure could occur, but we do not expect such changes in estimated costs will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 67. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On June 3, 2010, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Parent, and Acquisition, providing for the merger of Acquisition with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a subsidiary of Parent. Parent and Acquisition are affiliates of Wellspring Capital Management LLC (“Wellspring Capital”), a middle market private equity firm. Each outstanding share of common stock of the Company (other than treasury shares, shares held by Parent and Acquisition and any of their subsidiaries, shares with respect to which dissenters rights are properly exercised and shares held by our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and one other director on our Board of Directors) will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive $2.75 per share in cash (the “Merger Consideration”). Completion of the Merger is subject to (i) approval of the Merger by the shareholders of the Company, (ii) applicable regulatory approvals, including the termination or expiration of the applicable waiting period (and any extensions thereof) under the U.S. Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), and (iii) other customary closing conditions. On August 2, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

PREFERRED STOCK

At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, 29 and 0 shares, respectively, of Series B Preferred ~~Stock~~ remain outstanding and are convertible into 7,733 ~~and 0~~ shares of our common stock~~, respectively~~. The previously remaining shares of Series B Preferred Stock were cancelled in accordance with a settlement agreement between the Company and the holders of the stock executed in the first quarter of 2010.

At December 31, 2009 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, 5,396 shares of Series C ~~9% Convertible~~ Preferred ~~Stock (the “Series C Preferred”)~~ remain outstanding and are convertible into 2,767,179 shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of $1.95 per share.

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

We have two stock-based compensation plans available to grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted units and restricted stock to key employees, officers, directors, advisors and consultants to the Company. The Eighth Amended and Restated OMNI Energy Services Corp. Stock Incentive Plan (“Stock Plan”), provides for 5,750,000 shares of our common stock. The principal awards outstanding under our stock-based compensation plans include non-qualified stock options. In addition, we have the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the “1999 Plan”) which became effective on November 11, 1999 and was not approved by the stockholders. The total shares of our common stock available for issuance under the 1999 Plan isare 100,000 shares ~~as of March 31, 2010~~.

12The exercise price, term and other conditions applicable to each stock option granted under the stock plans are generally determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The exercise price of stock options is set on the grant date and may not be less than the fair market value per share of our stock on that date. The options generally become exercisable over a three-year period and expire after ten years.

There was $0.4 million and $0.8 million, and $0.2 million and $0.5 million of compensation cost related to non-qualified stock options recognized in operating results (included in general and administrative expenses) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

Historically, the fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility was based on implied volatilities from historical trading of our stock. We used the simplified method to derive an expected term. The expected term represents an estimate of the time that options are expected to remain outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option was based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The weighted average fair value at date of grant for options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 was $1.27 and $1.16 per option, respectively.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009		Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Expected volatility	80.61	%	54.39	%
Expected annual dividend yield	0.00	%	0.00	%
Risk free rate of return	3.26	%	3.46	%
Expected option term (years)	6.50		6.50

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, 800,000 options were granted to senior management at an exercise price $1.26 per share. Because the vesting of the options is based on several variable criteria (financial performance of the Company and the Company’s stock price as it relates to its peer group), the fair value of these options was estimated using the Monte Carlo valuation method. The shares will vest over a four year period. As the financial performance targets are met, compensation expense will be recognized. For the options based upon share price performance, the compensation is expensed ratably over the vesting period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the amount of expense related to this award was de minimus.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 (~~unaudited~~in thousands, except option amounts):

The exercise price, term and other conditions applicable to each stock option granted under the stock plans are generally determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The exercise price of stock options is set on the grant date and may not be less than the fair market value per share of our stock on that date. The options generally become exercisable over a three-year period and expire after ten years.


	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2009	1,646,841		$	2.21
Granted	800,000			1.26
Exercised	—			—
Lapsed or canceled	(27,084	)		2.26

Outstanding at March 31, 2010	2,419,757		$	1.90	7.5	$	73
Granted	28,000			2.05
Exercised	(9,030	)		2.26
Lapsed or canceled	(12,115	)		2.14

Outstanding at June 30, 2010	2,426,612		$	1.90	7.4	$	1,868

Exercisable at June 30, 2010	1,234,404		$	2.20	7.0	$	580

~~There~~At ~~was~~June 30, ~~$0.4~~2010, ~~million and~~ $01.3 million of total unrecognized compensation ~~cost~~costs related to ~~non-qualified~~the ~~stock~~unvested ~~options~~portion ~~recognized~~of inthe ~~operating~~option ~~results~~awards ~~(included~~is inexpected ~~general~~to ~~and~~be ~~administrative~~recognized ~~expenses)~~over ~~for~~a ~~the~~weighted ~~three~~average ~~months~~period ~~ended~~of ~~March 31,~~1.6 ~~2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively~~years.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, 800,000 options were granted to senior management at an exercise price $1.26 per share. Because the vesting of the options is based on several variable criteria (financial performance of the Company and the Company’s stock price as it relates to its peer group), the fair value of these options was estimated using the Monte Carlo valuation method. The shares will vest over a four year period. The value of options vesting based upon the stock price of the Company is being expensed ratably over the vesting period. The options which vest based upon the financial performance of the Company are charged against earnings based upon management’s assessment of the likelihood that the pre-established targets will be met. As the financial performance targets are met, compensation expense will be recognized. For the options based upon share price performance, the compensation is expensed ratably over the vesting period. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the amount of expense related to this award was de minimus.

The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands, except option amounts):

	Number ofOptions		WeightedAverageExercisePrice		WeightedAverageRemainingContractualTerm (years)	AggregateIntrinsicValue
Outstanding at December 31, 2009	1,646,841		$	2.21
Granted	800,000			1.26
Exercised	—			—
Lapsed or canceled	(27,084	)		2.26
Outstanding at March 31, 2010	2,419,757		$	1.90	7.5	$	73
Exercisable at March 31, 2010	1,115,823		$	2.23	7.1	$	—

WARRANTS

A summary of our warrants as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and changes during the three and six months then ended are presented below:

	WEIGHTED AVERAGEEXERCISE PRICE		WARRANTS
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	2.10	4,594,000
Granted		—	—
Exercised		—	—
Forfeited		—	—
Balance at March 31, 2010	$	2.10	4,594,000
Exercisable	$	2.10	4,594,000
Granted		—	—
Exercised		1.95	(3,997,550	)
Forfeited		3.38	(355,250	)
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	2.76	241,200
Exercisable	$	2.76	241,200

13RESTRICTED STOCK

The following table summarizes activity of unvested restricted stock awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:


	SHARES		WEIGHTED AVERAGE GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE		AGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE
					(in thousands)
Unvested at December 31, 2009	37,419		$	3.81
Granted	95,000		$	1.27
Vested	(29,479	)	$	1.92

Unvested at March 31, 2010	102,940		$	2.01	$	199
Granted	—		$	—
Vested	(13,979	)	$	3.70

Unvested at June 30, 2010	88,961		$	1.92	$	238

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~(unaudited)~~At June 30, 2010, $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested portion of the restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 2.75 years.

~~RESTRICTED~~During ~~STOCK~~the first quarter of 2010, certain of our subordinated notes payable were modified resulting in adjustment to the maturity dates and payment schedules of the notes. As an incentive to modify the notes, the Company authorized the issuance of an aggregate of 330,943 unregistered, restricted shares of our common stock in amounts dependent upon the balances modified. The restrictions on the shares will lapse at various times prior to the maturity of the notes and we may, at our option, pay the note balances prior to the new maturity dates. If payment of the notes is made prior to the lapse of the periodic restriction on the stock, the remaining restricted shares will be forfeited to us and cancelled. As of June 30, 2010, all 330,943 of the shares have been issued.

The following table summarizes activity of ~~management’s~~ restricted stock awards related to the modified subordinated notes for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010:

	SHARES		WEIGHTED AVERAGEGRANT DATEFAIR VALUE		AGGREGATEINTRINSICVALUE
					(in thousands)
Unvested at December 31, 2009	~~37,419~~—		$	~~3.81~~—
Granted	95250,~~000~~446		$	1.2752
Vested	(2962,~~479~~616	)	$	1.9252
Unvested at March 31, 2010	~~102~~187,~~940~~830		$	21.0152	$	~~199~~363
Granted	80,497		$	1.58
Vested	(20,125	)	$	1.58
Unvested at June 30, 2010	248,202		$	1.54	$	663

On January 5, 2010, we entered into Restricted Stock Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”) with certain of our executive officers pursuant to which we granted 95,000 shares of restricted stock under our Stock Plan. The restricted stock will ratably vest annually in equal 25% installments over a period of four years beginning on the grant date, January 5, 2010, and continuing on each anniversary thereof until January 5, 2013. However, the restricted stock will vest sooner if (i) the executive’s employment relationship with the Company is terminated due to the executive’s death or disability, (ii) the Company terminates the executive’s employment relationship with the Company without cause, or (iii) there is a change in control (as defined in the Stock Plan) of the Company. All unvested restricted stock will be forfeited if (i) the executive terminates his employment during the term of his employment agreement, (ii) the Company terminates the executive for cause (as defined in each executive’s employment agreement), or (iii) either the Company or the executive elect not to renew the executive’s employment pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.

At March 31, 2010, $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested portion of management’s restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years.

Subsequent to December 31, 2009, certain of our subordinated notes payable were modified resulting in adjustment to the maturity dates and payment schedules of the notes. As an incentive to modify the notes, the Company authorized the issuance of an aggregate of 330,943 unregistered, restricted shares of our common stock in amounts dependent upon the balances modified. The restrictions on the shares will lapse at various times prior to the maturity of the notes and we may, at our option, pay the note balances prior to the new maturity dates. If payment of the notes is made prior to the lapse of the periodic restriction on the stock, the remaining restricted shares will be forfeited to us and cancelled. As of March 31, 2010, 250,446 of the shares have been issued. An additional 53,665 share were issued subsequent to March 31, 2010 and the remainder will be issued in accordance with the relevant note modification agreement.

The following table summarizes activity of restricted stock awards related to the modified subordinated notes for the three months ended March 31, 2010:

	SHARES		WEIGHTED AVERAGEGRANT DATEFAIR VALUE		AGGREGATEINTRINSICVALUE
					(in thousands)
Unvested at December 31, 2009	—			—
Granted	250,446		$	1.52
Vested	(62,616	)	$	1.52
Unvested at March 31, 2010	187,830		$	1.52	$	363

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is determined by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if options and other contracts to issue shares of common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

AsFor ofthe ~~March~~three and six months ended June 3130, 2009 ~~and 2010~~, we had 1,~~488~~393,~~284~~043 and 1,~~768~~460,~~004~~390 options and restricted shares, respectively, and 5,192,650 ~~and~~ ~~4,594,000~~ warrants, ~~respectively,~~ that were excluded from the calculation of Diluted EPS as they were antidilutive. In addition, Holston Notes convertible into ~~358~~216,~~345~~450 and ~~212~~287,~~364~~006 shares of common stock, BEG Notes convertible into 0720,721 and ~~693,556~~ 756,558 shares of common stock and ILT Notes convertible into ~~333~~310,~~333~~623 and ~~164~~321,~~867~~915 shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 ~~and 2010~~, respectively. Also, preferred stock convertible into ~~0 and~~ 2,~~773~~774,~~624~~913 shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of ~~diluted~~Diluted EPS atfor ~~March 31,~~the ~~2009~~three months and ~~2010~~six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, because they were antidilutive.

14For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we had 444,077 and 1,890,126 options and restricted shares, respectively, and 2,225,775 and 3,403,345 warrants, respectively, that were excluded from the calculation of Diluted EPS as they were antidilutive. In addition, Holston Notes convertible into 199,047 and 205,669 shares of common stock, BEG Notes convertible into 636,667 and 664,955 shares of common stock and ILT Notes convertible into 139,725 and 152,227 shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Also, preferred stock convertible into 2,767,179 and 2,770,384 shares, respectively, of common stock were excluded from the calculation of Diluted EPS for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, because they were antidilutive.

NOTE 8. SEGMENT INFORMATION

ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” (“ASC 280”), requires that companies disclose segment data based on how management makes decisions about allocating resources to segments and measuring their performance. We revised our reportable business segments during the fourth quarter of 2009. The new operating segments are Seismic Services, Environmental and Other Services and Equipment Leasing. Financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 have been restated to reflect the change in operating segments. We revised our segments to align with changes in management’s resource allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding our operations. Our saltwater transportation and disposal, solids removal and hauling and liquid mud services, and boat tank and pit cleaning services are now included within our Environmental and Other Services segment. These changes reflect our current operating focus. All of our assets and operations are exclusively in North America. The segment classified as Corporate includes operating activities that support the executive offices, capital structure and costs of being a public registrant. These costs are not allocated to the operating segments when determining segment profit or loss. Certain of the June 30, 2009 information below has also been restated for the impact of the restatement discussed in Note 2.

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table shows segment information (~~unaudited~~net of intercompany transactions) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

The following table reconciles net loss available to common stockholders and common equivalent shares for the Basic EPS calculation to net loss available to common stockholders and common equivalent shares for the Diluted EPS calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively:


Three Months Ended June 30,	SEISMIC SERVICES			ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER SERVICES		EQUIPMENT LEASING			CORPORATE			TOTAL
	(In thousands)
2010
Operating revenues	$	7,100		$	16,705	$	7,641		$	—		$	31,446
Operating income (loss)		384			1,540		1,373			(3,101	)		196
Interest (income) expense		(1	)		115		19			959			1,092
Depreciation and amortization		243			1,542		1,574			72			3,431
Identifiable assets		17,887			50,904		50,761			11,169			130,721
Capital expenditures		463			541		144			14			1,162

2009
Operating revenues	$	12,293		$	14,808	$	5,500		$	—		$	32,601
Operating income (loss) (Restated)		2,222			1,673		(1,408	)		(1,984	)		503
Interest expense (Restated)		17			65		27			509			618
Depreciation and amortization		232			1,523		1,612			76			3,443
Identifiable assets (Restated)		19,997			46,057		56,524			13,206			135,784
Capital expenditures		222			123		—			12			357

Six Months Ended June 30,	SEISMIC SERVICES			ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER SERVICES		EQUIPMENT LEASING			CORPORATE			TOTAL
	(In thousands)
2010
Operating revenues	$	11,730		$	32,205	$	14,356		$	—		$	58,291
Operating income (loss)		(46	)		2,430		1,854			(4,769	)		(531	)
Interest expense		23			226		42			1,957			2,248
Depreciation and amortization		457			3,091		3,152			143			6,843
Identifiable assets		17,887			50,904		50,761			11,169			130,721
Capital expenditures		785			605		144			15			1,549

2009
Operating revenues	$	22,023		$	31,060	$	14,422		$	—		$	67,505
Operating income (loss) (Restated)		3,482			3,838		(1,419	)		(3,849	)		2,052
Interest expense (Restated)		32			147		52			1,346			1,577
Depreciation and amortization		466			2,956		3,206			152			6,780
Identifiable assets (Restated)		19,997			46,057		56,524			13,206			135,784
Capital expenditures		232			511		537			12			1,292

	Three Months EndedMarch 31, 2009				Three Months EndedMarch 31, 2010
	Dollars			WeightedAverageShares	Dollars			WeightedAverageShares
	(in thousands)
	(Restated)			(Restated)
Basic EPS net loss available to common stockholders	$	(308	)	20,577	$	(1,029	)	21,014
Add: Stock Options		—		—		—		—
Warrants		—		—		—		—
Contingently issuable shares		—		81		—		—
Preferred stock		—		—		—		—
Shareholder notes		—		—		—		—
Total dilutive effect		—		81		—		—
Diluted EPS net loss available to common stockholders and common equivalent shares	$	(308	)	20,658	$	(1,029	)	21,014

NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES

~~NOTE~~We 7account for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which requires recognition of future tax benefits (temporary differences), subject to a valuation allowance based on a more-likely-than-not criteria that such asset will be realized. ~~SEGMENT~~In ~~INFORMATION~~determining whether it is more-likely-than-not that we will realize such tax asset, ASC 740 requires that all negative and positive evidence be considered (with more weight given to evidence that is “objective and verifiable”) in making the determination. Because we do not believe that a reliable estimate of taxable income for 2010 can be made as of June 30, 2010, we used the actual effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to determine our tax benefit for the period. We recorded income tax expense of $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. We recorded income tax expense of $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and income tax benefit of $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

~~ASC~~On ~~280~~January 1, ~~“Segment Reporting” (“ASC 280”)~~2007, ~~requires~~we ~~that~~adopted ~~companies~~and ~~disclose~~implemented ~~segment~~ASC ~~data~~740 ~~based~~as onit ~~how~~related ~~management makes decisions about allocating resources~~ to ~~segments~~uncertainties ~~and~~in ~~measuring~~income ~~their performance~~taxes. WeAs ~~revised~~a ~~our~~result ~~reportable business segments during the fourth quarter~~ of ~~2009. The new operating segments are Seismic Services~~the implementation, ~~Environmental~~management ~~and~~assessed ~~Other~~its ~~Services and~~various ~~Equipment~~income ~~Leasing.~~tax ~~Financial~~positions; ~~results~~this ~~for~~assessment ~~the~~resulted ~~quarter~~in ~~ended~~no ~~March 31,~~adjustment ~~2009 have been restated~~ to ~~reflect~~ the ~~change~~tax inasset ~~operating~~or ~~segments~~liability. We ~~revised~~will ~~our~~account ~~segments~~for tointerest ~~align~~and ~~with~~penalties ~~changes~~relating into ~~management’s~~uncertain ~~resource~~tax ~~allocation~~positions ~~and performance assessment~~ in ~~making~~the ~~decisions~~current regarding our operations. Our saltwater transportation and disposal, solids removal and hauling and liquid mud services, and boat tank and pit cleaning services are now included within our Environmental and Otherperiod ~~Services~~income ~~segment.~~statement ~~These~~as ~~changes~~part ~~reflect our current operating focus. All~~ of ~~our~~the ~~assets~~provision ~~and~~for ~~operations~~income ~~are~~taxes, ~~exclusively~~as ~~in North America~~necessary. The ~~segment~~2004, ~~classified~~2005, ~~as Corporate includes operating activities that support the executive offices~~2006, ~~capital structure~~2007 and ~~costs~~2008 oftax ~~being~~years aremain ~~public~~subject ~~registrant. These costs are not allocated~~ to ~~the~~examination ~~operating~~by ~~segments~~various ~~when determining segment profit or loss. Certain of the March 31~~federal, ~~2009~~state ~~information~~and ~~below~~foreign ~~has~~tax ~~also been restated for the impact of the restatement discussed in Note 2~~jurisdictions.

~~The~~NOTE ~~following~~10. ~~table~~RELATED ~~shows~~PARTY ~~segment~~TRANSACTIONS ~~information (net of intercompany transactions) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended March 31,	SEISMICSERVICES			ENVIRONMENTALAND OTHERSERVICES		EQUIPMENTLEASING			CORPORATE			TOTAL
	(In thousands)
2010
Operating revenues	$	4,630		$	15,499	$	6,716		$	—		$	26,845
Operating income (loss)		(430	)		890		481			(1,668	)		(727	)
Interest expense		25			110		23			998			1,156
Depreciation and amortization		214			1,549		1,578			71			3,412
Identifiable assets		15,035			46,074		51,445			12,831			125,385
Capital expenditures		322			64		—			1			387
2009 (Restated)
Operating revenues	$	9,729		$	16,252	$	8,923		$	—		$	34,904
Operating income (loss) (Restated)		1,259			2,165		(11	)		(1,864	)		1,549
Interest expense (Restated)		15			82		25			837			959
Depreciation and amortization		234			1,434		1,594			75			3,337
Identifiable assets (Restated)		19,085			50,171		61,408			12,112			142,776
Capital expenditures		10			388		537			—			935

On May 17, 2005, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain of our affiliates and executive officers to issue up to $5.0 million of Series C Preferred in conjunction with the completion of a term loan. Our Series C Preferred is convertible into our common stock at a conversion price of $1.95 per share and includes detachable warrants to purchase up to 6,550,000 additional shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging between $1.95 and $3.50 per share. The transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement closed in two tranches. On May 17, 2005, we issued an aggregate of 3,500 shares of Series C Preferred and

1517

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~(unaudited)~~ warrants to acquire 4,585,000 shares of our common stock, in exchange for $3.5 million. On August 29, 2005, the remainder of the Series C Preferred and warrants were issued generating proceeds of $1.5 million and we granted the remaining 1,965,000 warrants.

~~NOTE~~The 8prior term loan agreement and senior credit facility restricted the payment of cash dividends. ~~INCOME~~Consequently, ~~TAXES~~a portion of the 9% dividend obligation related to the Series C Preferred was satisfied through the issuance of payment-in-kind (“PIK”) dividends. The PIK dividends were paid through the issuance of additional shares of Series C Preferred. These additional shares of preferred stock did not have warrants attached to them. During the year ended December 31, 2007, 256 shares of Series C Preferred were issued as PIK dividends at par. Effective April 29, 2007, the loan and security agreement governing the Term Loan was amended to remove the restriction on cash dividend payments on the preferred equity shares, provided we had sufficient availability under our Revolver and were in compliance with all other covenants. Consequently, the accrued dividends since April 2007 have been paid in cash, $0.1 million and $0.4 million, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

WeNOTE account for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which requires recognition of future tax benefits (temporary differences), subject to a valuation allowance based on more-likely-than-not that such asset will be realized11. InSUBSEQUENT ~~determining~~EVENTS whether it is more-likely-than-not that we will realize such tax asset, ASC 740 requires that all negative and positive evidence be considered (with more weight given to evidence that is “objective and verifiable”) in making the determination. We recorded income tax expense of $0.8 million and an income tax benefit of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

On January 1, 2007, we adopted and implemented ASC 740 as it relates to uncertainties in income taxes. As a result of the implementation, management assessed its various income tax positions; this assessment resulted in no adjustment to the tax asset or liability. We will account for interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions in the current period income statement as part of the provision for income taxes, as necessary. The 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 tax years remain subject to examination by various federal, state and foreign tax jurisdictions.

NOTE 9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The prior term loan agreement and senior credit facility restricted the payment of cash dividends. Consequently, a portion of the 9% dividend obligation related to the Series C Preferred were satisfied through the issuance of payment-in-kind (“PIK”) dividends. The PIK dividends were paid through the issuance of additional shares of Series C Preferred. These additional shares of preferred stock did not have warrants attached to them. During the year ended December 31, 2007, 256 shares of Series C Preferred were issued as PIK dividends at par. Effective April 29, 2007, the loan and security agreement governing the Term Loan was amended to remove the restriction on cash dividend payments on the preferred equity shares, provided we had sufficient availability under our Revolver and were in compliance with all other covenants. Consequently, the accrued dividends since April 2007 have been paid in cash, $0.1 million for each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2010.

NOTE 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 6, 2010, the parties to the Petition for Declaratory Judgment reached a settlement with respect to the payment of the final installment of the Cypress Note. We paid to the claimants named in the Petition for Declaratory Judgment a total of $0.8 million and agreed to assume liabilities of $0.2 million. We received from all claimants, a release of any and all claims for amounts due under the Cypress Note. The settlement also provided for the resolution of the matters involving accounts receivable retention, sub-lease obligations and advances in our relationship with Cypress.

On May 6, 2010, certain holders of the Series C Preferred exercised a total of 3,897,550 warrants with an exercise price of $1.95 on a cashless basis. As a result of the cashless exercise, the Company issued 1,267,716 shares of common stock. Additionally, on the same day, 100,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.95 were exercised for cash resulting in an additional 100,000 shares of common stock being issued and the Company receiving cash of approximately $0.2 million.

On June 3, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Wellspring OMNI Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Wellspring OMNI Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Acquisition”), providing for the merger of Acquisition with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger (the “Merger”) as a subsidiary of Parent. Parent and Acquisition are affiliates of Wellspring Capital Management LLC (“Wellspring Capital”), a middle market private equity firm. Each outstanding share of common stock of the Company (other than treasury shares, shares held by Parent and Acquisition and any of their subsidiaries, shares with respect to which dissenters rights are properly exercised and shares held by our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and one other director on our Board of Directors) will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive $2.75 per share in cash (the “Merger Consideration”). Completion of the Merger is subject to (i) approval of the Merger by the shareholders of the Company, (ii) applicable regulatory approvals, including the termination or expiration of the applicable waiting period (and any extensions thereof) under the U.S. Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), and (iii) other customary closing conditions. On August 2, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act.

Effective June 30, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Keeton Services, Inc. and Griswold Management, Inc. (“Keeton”) pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Keeton Purchase Agreement”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the Keeton Purchase Agreement, consideration was approximately $3.5 million, including $1.75 million in cash and $1.75 million in a 6% promissory note payable to the former owners. Keeton provides completion fluids to various customers.

On August 24, 2010, a holder of the Series C Preferred exercised 115,200 warrants with an exercise price of $1.95 on a cashless basis. As a result of the cashless exercise, the Company issued 32,307 shares of common stock.

1618

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains certain “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which reflect management’s best judgment based on factors currently known. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these “forward looking statements” as a result of a number of factors, including but not limited to those discussed under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements.” Forward looking statements provided by us pursuant to the safe harbor established by the federal securities laws should be evaluated in the context of these factors.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the accompanying notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2010.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained in all parts of this document (including the portion, if any, to which this Form 10-Q is attached), including, but not limited to, those relating to ~~our~~the ~~acquisition~~Merger ~~plans~~Agreement and Merger, the effect of changes in strategy and business discipline, future tax matters, future general and administrative expenses, future growth and expansion, expansion of ~~our~~ our operations, review of acquisitions, expansion and improvement of our capabilities, integration of new technology into operations, credit facilities, redetermination of our borrowing base, attraction of new members to the management team, future compensation programs, new alliances, future capital expenditures (or funding thereof) and working capital, sufficiency of future working capital, borrowings and capital resources and liquidity, projected rates of return, timely conversion of backlog into revenue, retained earnings and dividend policies, projected cash flows from operations, future, outcome, effects or timing of any legal proceedings or contingencies, the impact of any change in accounting policies on our financial statements, realization of post-closing price adjustments with respect to the recent acquisitions, management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, the identification of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and any other statements regarding future operations, financial results, opportunities, growth, business plans and strategy and other statements that are not historical facts are forward looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current view of future events and financial performance. When used in this document, the words “budgeted,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “potential,” “forecast,” “might,” “predict,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to be among the statements that identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of their dates and should not be unduly relied upon. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those set forth under ITEM 1A. “RISK FACTORS” and other factors detailed in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on ~~March~~August 3126, 2010 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties.

GENERAL

We were founded in 1987, as OMNI Drilling Corporation, to provide drilling services to the geophysical industry. In July 1996, OMNI Geophysical, L.L.C. acquired substantially all of the assets of OMNI Geophysical Corporation, the successor to the business of OMNI Drilling Corporation. OMNI Energy Services Corp. (“OMNI”) was formed as a Louisiana corporation on September 11, 1997 to acquire all of the outstanding common units of OMNI Geophysical, L.L.C.

We are an integrated oilfield service company specializing in providing a range of (i) onshore seismic drilling, operational support, permitting, and survey services; (ii) dock-side and offshore hazardous and non-hazardous oilfield waste management and environmental cleaning services, including tank and vessel cleaning and safe vessel entry; drilling fluid transportation and disposal services; other specialized services such as metal stress relieving, environmental pit cleaning, wellhead preheating and wellhead installation and (iii) oilfield equipment rental, for oil and gas companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico, the Rocky Mountain region and prolific shale regions in the South Central United States and the Appalachian Region. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we operated in three business segments—Seismic Services, Environmental and Other Services, and Equipment Leasing. For information about the revenues, operating income (loss) and other financial information relating to the segments, see Note 78 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Our business is driven by the supply and demand of hydrocarbon commodities in the United States and, to a certain extent, the international markets. Virtually all of our customers are involved in the exploration and/or production of oil and natural gas in the continental United States and the coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Not surprisingly, a higher demand for oil and gas results in a higher demand for our equipment and services. We experienced a ~~slight~~ reduction in Seismic Services in the first and second quarter of 2010 related to weather and permitting issues and a general ~~slowdown~~slow down in the exploration activity in ~~the~~ the market areas in which we operate. As the economy has shown signs of recovery and the land-based rig count has increased, we have seen an increase in opportunities in the shale plays in the areas in which we operate. Increased activity in the Haynesville Shale area has led to increased demand for items in our equipment rental fleet. Additionally, the increase in rig count has expanded our opportunities in the environmental services sector of our business.

In the past, we have been very active in acquiring companies which we believe are well aligned with our Company philosophy. We plan to expand our presence in the environmental services industry in the markets in which we serve through organic growth and through additional acquisitions as such opportunities arise that we believe fit into our overall business strategy.

We continue to maintain a large and visible presence along the coast of Louisiana to service our customers in the offshore exploration and production markets. While the offshore rig counts in the Gulf of Mexico have fallen in recent years and remain stagnant halfway into 2010, we feel that there is still adequate activity in the area to allow us to remain profitable in that region.

Our acquisitions have allowed us to expand our operations into what currently appear to be more prolific areas of activity, such as the Rocky Mountains and prolific shale regions in the South Central United States. Additionally, we have expanded organically into the Marcellus Shale area in the northeast United States with our seismic services and equipment leasing operations.

We anticipate that the Haynesville, Eagle Ford and Marcellus Shale regions will continue to be a very active area in terms of natural gas exploration. Additionally, the Rocky Mountains have shown increased activity and we are currently expanding our equipment leasing operations into the Bakken Shale region in North Dakota.

Seismic Services.

The market for our Seismic Services segment is South Central United States as well as the Appalachian Region in the Northeast United States. Additionally, we believe we are a leading provider of seismic drilling support services in the marsh, swamp, shallow water and contiguous dry land areas along the Gulf of Mexico (the “Transition Zone”), primarily in Louisiana and Texas.

We own and operate a fleet of specialized seismic drilling and transportation equipment for use in the Transition Zone. We believe we are the only company that currently can both provide an integrated range of seismic drilling, permitting, and survey services in all of the varied terrain of the Transition Zone and simultaneously support operations for multiple, large-scale seismic projects.

In March 2007, we acquired certain assets of Cypress Consulting Services, Inc. d/b/a Cypress Energy Services (“Cypress”), thereby expanding our fleet of seismic drilling equipment and allowing us to better serve the needs of our seismic drilling customers. The entirety of the operations related to the assets purchased from Cypress ~~are~~is included in our Seismic Services segment.

Environmental and Other Services.

We provide specialized environmental cleaning and maintenance equipment and trained personnel to oil and gas companies operating in the Gulf Coast region of the United States. Our services include dock-side and offshore hazardous and non-hazardous oilfield waste management and environmental cleaning services, including drilling rig, tank and vessel cleaning (tank degassing and demolition and rig pit cleaning), safe vessel entry, naturally occurring radioactive material (“NORM”) decontamination and surveys, platform abandonment services, pipeline flushing, gas dehydration, hydro blasting, and offshore sandblasting and painting. We also assist production operators in the maintenance and replacement of anodes, mist extractors, valves, glycol systems, chemical electric units and fire tubes. Demand for environmental services is directly impacted by offshore drilling and production activity in the Gulf of Mexico. Our dock side services are dependent upon the movement of vessels from offshore production platforms or drilling rigs which operate non-stop throughout the year, and demand for our dock-side vessel and tank cleaning and non-hazardous waste treatment businesses are primarily driven by drilling and well-site abandonment activity in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, as reflected by the drilling rig count. Much of the cleaning and waste treatment is from residual waste created in the drilling process.

In March 2007, we acquired BMJ Industrial Investments, L.L.C. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Charles Holston, Inc. (collectively “Holston”). This acquisition provided us with additional opportunities to expand our Environmental and Other Services segment with corrosion proofing and offshore cleaning capabilities. Through Holston we also expanded our transportation services to include vacuum truck, winch truck, roll-off truck and flat bed services supporting both drilling and production. Holston also offers transportation of non-hazardous by-products, such as saltwater and spent drilling fluids. Holston originally operated two saltwater disposal wells for the disposal of non-hazardous by-products.

In June 2007, we acquired certain assets of Bailey Operating, Inc. (“BOI”), which geographically extended our core businesses into the Barnett Shale region in North Texas. These assets included an additional saltwater disposal well for the disposal of non-hazardous by-products. Not only did we acquire an exceptional facility for the disposal of non-hazardous oilfield waste by-products, the acquisition also established a platform for further geographic expansion of our core businesses. We have expanded our Environmental and Other Services and Equipment Leasing operations into the Barnett Shale region. We have also expanded our operations into the Haynesville Shale and Fayetteville Shale areas.

In January 2008, we acquired the assets of B.E.G. Liquid Mud Services Corp. (“BEG”), which was an extension of our fluid transportation services and our land-based equipment leasing operations. It allows us to better serve our customers by offering drilling support packages including the supply of drilling fluids, chemicals, storage, mixing and fluid pumping services as well as fluid trucking, recycling, tank cleaning and disposal services. Through Holston, we currently handle the transportation of oilfield drilling and production fluids in Louisiana. The acquisition of BEG strategically positions us for further geographic expansion of these services and also extends our transportation and land-based equipment leasing operations into the southern regions of the Barnett Shale and into East Texas. Additionally, we believe we will be able to capitalize on our existing customer relationships to geographically expand BEG’s fluid service distribution facilities into other prolific onshore regions of the United States.

The acquisition of Preheat, Inc. (“Preheat”) in February 2006 allowed us to offer additional services, including wellhead installation services and metal stress relieving services, to our customers in the Gulf of Mexico and southern United States.

With our acquisitions of Preheat, Rig Tools, Holston, and Industrial Lift we have expanded the list of equipment and services that we offer to customers operating in the Gulf of Mexico and Rocky Mountain regions and the prolific Barnett, Haynesville, Fayetteville and Marcellus Shale regions. Our Equipment Leasing segment has customer lists including virtually all of the major and independent oil and gas companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico and the Rocky Mountains and the prolific shale plays in the United States.

Our June 30, 2010 acquisition of Keeton provides us with opportunities in markets where completion fluids are in demand and allows cross-selling opportunities with our liquid mud operations mentioned above.

Equipment Leasing.

Through our subsidiaries Preheat, Rig Tools and Holston, we provide rental equipment for various oilfield and commercial applications including pressure washers, steam cleaners, water, mud and disposal pumps; mud, fuel and frac tanks; air compressors; wireline units; generators; high pressure washers; light towers; tubing; and handling tools.

Rental equipment is charged on a daily basis. Our ability to successfully secure and maintain future rental and service opportunities with Preheat customers is dependent upon our ability to continue to provide high-quality, dependable rental equipment and reliable services to these customers at a competitive price.

The April 2008 acquisition of Industrial Lift Truck and Equipment Co., Inc. (“Industrial Lift”) allowed us to further expand the line of products that we provide for lease into specialized lifting units such as industrial forklifts and manlifts. Industrial Lift has operating facilities in Broussard, Louisiana and Lincoln, Texas.

All of our operations are subject to seasonal variations in weather conditions and available daylight hours. Since our drilling and environmental activities take place outdoors, on average we experience lower production in winter months than in summer months, due to an increase in rain, fog, and cold conditions and a decrease in daylight hours. These winter conditions also generally result in fewer hours worked per day and fewer holes drilled or surveyed per day during that season.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and provide a basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available through open market quotes. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We must use our judgment related to uncertainties in order to make these estimates and assumptions.

For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates as well as certain sensitivity disclosures related to those estimates, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2010. Our critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed materially during the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2009			2010			2009			2010
	(in thousands)
	(Restated)						(Restated)
	(Restated)
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating revenue:
Operating revenue
Services	$	2527,~~981~~102		$	2023,~~129~~805		$	53,083		$	43,934
Rentals		85,~~923~~499			67,~~716~~641			14,422			14,357
Total operating revenue		3432,~~904~~601			2631,~~845~~446			67,505			58,291
Operating expenses:
Direct costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
Services		18,~~189~~308			1618,~~099~~535			36,496			34,634
Rentals		43,~~458~~118			3,~~438~~692			7,577			7,130
Depreciation and amortization		3,~~337~~443			3,~~412~~431			6,780			6,843
General and administrative expenses		7,~~371~~156			45,~~623~~592			14,527			10,215
Total operating expenses		3332,~~355~~025			2731,~~572~~250			65,380			58,822
Operating income (loss)		1,549			(727	)
Impairment of fixed assets		73			—			73			—
Interest expense		(959	)		(1,156	)
Operating income (loss)		503			196			2,052			(531	)
Other income, net		6			20
Interest expense		(618	)		(1,092	)		(1,577	)		(2,248	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		596			(1,863	)
Other income (expense), net		(8	)		3			(2	)		23
(Provision) benefit for income taxes		(784	)		954
Income (loss) before (provision) benefit for income taxes		(123	)		(893	)		473			(2,756	)
Net loss		(188	)		(909	)
(Provision) benefit for income taxes		(205	)		(182	)		(989	)		772
Dividends on preferred stock		(120	)		(120	)
Net loss		(328	)		(1,075	)		(516	)		(1,984	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(308	)	$	(1,029	)
Dividends on preferred stock		(121	)		(121	)		(241	)		(241	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(449	)	$	(1,196	)	$	(757	)	$	(2,225	)

~~THREE~~22 ~~MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009~~

Operating revenues decreased $8.1 million, from $34.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $26.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Operating revenues related to services decreased $5.9 million. Our Seismic Services segment and our Environmental and Other Services segment accounted for $5.1 million and $0.8 million of the decrease, respectively. Operating revenues related to our Equipment Leasing segment decreased by $2.2 million. The decrease in revenues in our Seismic Services segment was attributable to significant weather delays in the northeast United States and contraction in capital spending by our customers. The Environmental and Other Services and Equipment Leasing segments are directly impacted by the number of rigs operating in the United States and the Gulf of Mexico. The rig counts were reduced compared to the number of rigs operating during the first quarter of 2009. Additionally, with the compression in drilling activity, we have felt considerable pricing pressure for our equipment and services. Our Environmental and Other Services segment was impacted to a lesser degree because a portion of the work that we perform is driven by the production process, as opposed to the exploration and drilling process, and the number of active facilities has remained stable. During the first quarter of 2010, we also expanded our environmental operations into additional markets where we feel organic growth opportunities exist.

Direct costs related to services decreased $2.1 million, from $18.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $16.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Direct costs for our seismic services segment decreased $2.8 million. The decrease was in response to lower activity levels as described above and was offset by increases in our environmental and other services segment of $0.7 million. Direct costs related to rentals decreased $1.1 million, from $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Of the total decrease in direct costs, $1.6 million relates to payroll costs and $1.3 million relates to third-party contract services.

Depreciation and amortization costs increased $0.1 million from $3.3 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 to $3.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010. Depreciation expense increased $0.1 million due to the increase in revenue-producing assets. Amortization expense remained constant between the two periods.

~~General~~THREE ~~and~~MONTHS ~~administrative~~ENDED ~~costs~~JUNE ~~decreased $2.8 million~~30, ~~from~~2010 ~~$7.4~~COMPARED ~~million~~TO ~~during~~THREE ~~the~~MONTHS ~~three month~~ENDED ~~period~~JUNE ~~ended March 31~~30, 2009 ~~to $4.6 million during the same three month period of 2010 primarily as a result of decreased payroll costs.~~

~~Interest~~Operating ~~expense~~revenues ~~increased~~decreased ~~approximately~~ $01.2 million, from $132.06 million for the three ~~month~~months ~~period~~ ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, to $131.2 4 million for the three months ~~month period~~ ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. ~~Interest~~Operating ~~expense~~revenues ~~includes~~related to services decreased $03.3 million. Our Seismic Services segment accounted for $5.2 million of the decrease while our Environmental and Other Services segment increased $01.49 million,. Operating ~~respectively,~~revenues related to our Equipment Leasing segment increased by $2.1 million. The decrease in revenues in our Seismic Services segment was attributable to continued weather delays in the areas in which we operate and delays in commencement of jobs previously awarded due in part to customer concern for price stability in natural gas markets. The Environmental and Other Services and Equipment Leasing segments are directly impacted by the ~~three~~number ~~month~~of ~~periods~~rigs ~~ended~~operating ~~March 31,~~in ~~2009~~the United States and the ~~2010~~Gulf ~~related~~of toMexico. ~~amortization~~The land-based rig counts for the second quarter of ~~deferred~~2010 ~~loan~~were ~~costs~~significantly higher than the counts for the same period in 2009. The rig counts in the Gulf of Mexico remained at depressed levels. Our traditional environmental ~~increase~~operations were adversely affected by the effects of the oil spill in ~~interest~~the ~~expense~~Gulf isof Mexico as a result of the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion which occurred in April 2010 while under contract to British Petroleum (“BP”). However, we were able to offset the negative impact on our traditional environmental operations by securing ancillary work related to ~~increase~~the clean-up of the BP spill. Our Equipment Leasing segment performed favorably in ~~interest~~the ~~rates~~second ~~and~~quarter ~~charges~~of ~~related~~2010 as compared to the same ~~modification~~quarter in 2009 as a result of ~~our~~the ~~subordinated~~higher ~~debt~~land-based rig count resulting in an increase in the demand for our equipment.

~~Income~~Direct ~~tax~~costs ~~expense~~related ~~decreased~~to byservices ~~approximately~~increased $10.72 million, from ~~a tax expense of~~ $018.83 million for the ~~period~~three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, to ~~a benefit of~~ $118.0 5 million for the three ~~month~~months ~~period~~ ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Direct costs for our Seismic Services segment decreased $2.1 million. The decrease iswas ~~attributable~~in response to aexecution ~~loss~~delays ~~before~~as ~~income~~described ~~taxes~~above ~~for~~and ~~the~~was ~~current~~offset ~~quarter~~by ~~compared~~increases in our Environmental and Other Services segment of $1.9 million. Direct costs related to ~~income~~rentals ~~before~~increased ~~income~~$0.6 ~~taxes~~million, from $3.1 million for the ~~same~~three ~~period~~months inended June 30, 2009. ~~The~~to ~~effective tax~~$3.7 ~~rate~~million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. ~~quarter~~Of isthe 51total increase in direct costs, $0.2%9 million relates to cost of parts and repairs and maintenance, $0.7 ~~The~~million ~~rate~~relates isto ~~higher~~rentals ~~than~~and ~~the~~leases, ~~statutory~~$0.6 ~~federal~~million ~~rate~~relates ~~because~~to ofexplosives ~~the~~and ~~addition~~downhole ofsupplies, ~~state~~$0.4 ~~income~~million ~~taxes~~relates to insurance and ~~permanent~~$0.3 ~~differences~~million ~~encountered~~relates into ~~the~~fuel and ~~course~~oil, offset by decreases of ~~the~~$0.7 ~~Company’s~~million ~~day~~in payroll costs and $1.4 million in third-~~to-day~~party ~~operations~~contract services.

Depreciation and amortization costs remained constant at $3.4 million between the two periods.

General and administrative costs decreased $1.6 million, from $7.2 million during the three month period ended June 30, 2009 to $5.6 million during the same three month period of 2010. Compensation costs decreased by $1.2 million due in large part to reduced cost related to contingent compensation associated with certain subordinated promissory notes. Additionally, bad debt expense decreased $1.2 million, due primarily to the fact we incurred no material cost associated with a client bankruptcy as we did in the same period in 2009. Professional services increased $0.8 million as a result of increased fees associated with the “Merger Agreement”.

Interest expense increased approximately $0.5 million from $0.6 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, to $1.1 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2010. Interest expense includes $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 related to amortization of deferred loan costs. The increase in interest expense is related to increase in interest rates and charges related to the modification of our subordinated debt.

Income tax expense remained constant at a tax expense of $0.2 million for the period ended June 30, 2009, and the three month period ended June 30, 2010. The effective income tax benefit rate for the 2010 quarter is 20.4%. The rate is different from the statutory federal rate because of the addition of state income taxes and permanent differences encountered in the course of the Company’s operations.

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

Operating revenues decreased $9.2 million, from $67.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $58.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Operating revenues related to services decreased $9.2 million. Our Seismic Services segment accounted for $10.3 million of the decrease while our Environmental and Other Services segment’s revenue increased $1.1 million. Operating revenues related to our Equipment Leasing segment remained constant at $14.4 million for each of the two periods. The decrease in revenues in our Seismic Services segment was attributable to significant weather delays in the areas in which we operate and delays in commencement of jobs while permits were being secured coupled with customer concern for price stability in natural gas markets. The Environmental and Other Services and Equipment Leasing segments are directly impacted by the number of rigs operating in the United States and the Gulf of Mexico. The land-based rig counts for the second quarter of 2010 were significantly higher than the counts for the same period in 2009. The rig counts in the Gulf of Mexico remained at depressed levels. Our traditional environmental operations were adversely affected by the effects of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as a result of the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion which occurred in April 2010 while under contract to BP. However, we were able to offset the negative impact on our traditional environmental operations by securing ancillary work related to the clean-up of the BP spill. Our Equipment Leasing segment performed favorably in the first six months of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 as a result of the higher land-based rig count resulting in an increase in the demand for our equipment.

Direct costs related to services decreased $1.9 million, from $36.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $34.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Direct costs for our Seismic Services segment decreased $4.9 million. The decrease was in response to execution delays as described above and was offset by increases in our Environmental and Other Services segment of $2.7 million and corporate of $0.3 million. Direct costs related to rentals decreased $0.5 million, from $7.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Of the $2.4 million decrease in total direct costs, $2.6 million relates to payroll costs and $2.7 million relates to third-party contract services, offset by increases of $0.8 million in cost of parts and repairs and maintenance, $1.4 million in rentals and leases, $0.3 million in explosives and downhole supplies, $0.5 million in fuel and oil.

Depreciation and amortization costs remained constant at $6.8 million between the two periods.

General and administrative costs decreased $4.3 million, from $14.5 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2009 to $10.2 million during the same six month period of 2010. Compensation costs decreased $4.1 million due in large part to reduced cost related to contingent compensation of $1.4 million associated with certain subordinated promissory notes as well as lower compensation as a result of reduced head count compared to the same period in 2009. Additionally, bad debt expense decreased $1.2 million, due primarily to the fact that we incurred no material cost associated with a client bankruptcy as we did in the same period in 2009. Professional services increased $0.8 million and investor relations costs increased $0.2 million as a result of increased fees associated with the Merger Agreement.

Interest expense increased approximately $0.6 million from $1.6 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, to $2.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Interest expense includes $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 related to amortization of deferred loan costs. The increase in interest expense is related to increase in interest rates and charges related to the modification of our subordinated debt.

Income tax expense decreased by approximately $1.8 million from a tax expense of $1.0 million for the period ended June 30, 2009, to a benefit of $0.8 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. The decrease is attributable to a greater loss before income taxes for the current six months compared to the same period in 2009. The effective income tax benefit rate for the 2010 six month period is 28.0%. The rate is different from the statutory federal rate because of the addition of state income taxes and permanent differences encountered in the course of the Company’s operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Effective as of April 24, 2008, we completed a modified $90.0 million credit facility (“Senior Credit Facility”), including a $50.0 million term loan, a $25.0 million working capital revolving line of credit, and a $15.0 million delayed draw term loan available to fund future acquisitions. With the proceeds from the Senior Credit Facility, we (i) repaid approximately $28.7 million of outstanding principal balance under our previous term loan; (ii) repaid approximately $2.1 million of outstanding principal balance under our previous capital expenditure loan; (iii) repaid the balance on the previous line of credit; and (iv) ~~closed~~completed the acquisition of Industrial Lift. The balance of the proceeds available under the Senior Credit Facility was used to pay fees and expenses of the aforementioned transaction and to provide additional working capital.

~~During~~At ~~March~~June 30, 2010, we ~~entered~~had ~~into~~approximately an$0.7 ~~amendment~~million in cash compared to $1.9 million in cash at December 31, 2009, and ~~waiver~~working capital of $6.7 million at June 30, 2010, compared to ~~our~~$8.1 ~~Senior~~million ~~Credit~~at ~~Facility~~December 31, 2009. ~~The~~At ~~waiver~~June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had $12.5 million and $7.6 million available for future borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Cash provided ~~relief~~by ~~from~~operating ~~violations~~activities ~~related~~was to$5.3 million for the ~~timely~~six ~~filing~~months ofended ~~certain~~June 30, ~~reports~~2010 ~~with~~compared ~~the~~to ~~lender~~$16.9 ~~Additionally,~~million for the ~~amendment~~same ~~adjusted~~period ~~the~~in ~~required~~2009 ~~covenants~~due ~~related~~to a decrease in net income and non-cash adjustments to ~~our~~deferred ~~leverage~~income ~~ratio~~taxes as well as increases in trade receivables and payables. Cash used in investing activities was $2.8 million for the ~~remainder~~six ofmonths ended June 30, 2010 compared to $0.4 million during the ~~term~~same period in 2009. The difference is due, in part, to the use of operating capital in the ~~loan~~acquisition of Keeton Services, Inc. Asand aGriswold ~~result~~Management, ~~at March~~Inc., effective June 3130, 2010, wealong ~~were~~with the decrease in ~~compliance~~restricted ~~with~~cash ~~all~~in ~~covenants~~2009. ~~under~~Cash used in financing activities was $3.7 million for the ~~Senior~~six ~~Credit~~months ~~Facility~~ended June 30, 2010 compared to $16.7 million for the same period in 2009 due primarily to the pay down of the long term debt and the revolving line of credit during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

~~At March 31~~Historically, ~~2010,~~our ~~we had~~capital ~~approximately~~requirements ~~$1.8~~have ~~million~~primarily inrelated ~~cash compared~~ to ~~$1.9~~the ~~million~~purchase inor ~~cash~~fabrication atof ~~December 31,~~new ~~2009,~~drilling equipment and related ~~working~~support ~~capital~~equipment, expansion of ~~$9.6~~our ~~million~~rental atand ~~March 31,~~transportation ~~2010,~~fleets ~~compared~~and tonew ~~$8.1~~business ~~million at December 31, 2009~~acquisitions. AtThus ~~March 31,~~far ~~2010~~in ~~and December 31~~2010, ~~2009,~~ we ~~had~~have ~~$9.5~~expended ~~million~~approximately ~~and~~ $71.65 million ~~available~~on ~~for~~unfinanced ~~future~~equipment ~~borrowings~~and ~~under~~other ~~our~~fixed ~~revolving line of credit~~assets. ~~Cash~~For ~~provided by operating activities was $3.7 million for~~ the ~~three~~remainder ~~months~~of ~~ended March 31~~2010, ~~2010 compared to $10.7~~we ~~million~~expect ~~for the same period in 2009 due~~ to aexplore ~~decrease~~strategic inbusiness ~~net~~opportunities ~~income~~ and ~~non-cash~~closely ~~adjustments~~monitor toour ~~deferred~~operational ~~income~~needs ~~taxes as well as trade receivables and payables. Cash used in investing activities was $0.2 million~~ for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $0.1 million provided by investing activities during the same period in 2009. The difference is due to the decrease in restricted cash in 2009 partially offset by the reduction in capital expenditures ~~in 2010~~. Cash used in financing activities was $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $11.3 million for the same period in 2009 due primarily to the pay down of the revolving line of credit during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Historically, our capital requirements have primarily related to the purchase or fabrication of new drilling equipment and related support equipment, expansion of our rental and transportation fleets and new business acquisitions. Thus far in 2010, we have expended approximately $0.4 million on unfinanced equipment and other fixed assets. For the remainder of 2010, we expect to explore strategic business opportunities and closely monitor our operational needs for capital expenditures.

We believe that our internally generated cash flow from operations is sufficient to finance our cash requirements for current and future operations, budgeted capital expenditures and debt service for 2010. As we have historically done, we may, from time to time, access available funds under our Senior Credit Facility to supplement our liquidity to meet our cash requirements for day to day operations and times of peak needs throughout the year. Our planned capital expenditures as well as any acquisitions we choose to pursue, are expected to be financed through a combination of cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no significant changes in our market risks since the year ended December 31, 2009. For more information, please read the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~March~~August 3126, 2010.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

21As of the end of June 30, 2010, management performed, with the participation of our CEO and our CFO, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designated to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and our CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on the evaluation and the identification of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

~~Table~~Because of ~~Contents~~the material weaknesses identified in our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2009, we performed additional substantive procedures so that our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

As of the end of March 31, 2010, management performed, with the participation of our CEO and our CFO, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designated to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and our CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on the evaluation and the identification of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, management concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Because of the material weaknesses identified in our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2009, we performed additional substantive procedures so that our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

We believe that, because we performed the substantial additional procedures referenced above, the consolidated financial statements for the periods included in this Quarterly Report are fairly presented in all material respects in accordance with GAAP.

Management is committed to achieving effective internal control over financial reporting. Our remediation efforts are described in Item 9A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on August 26, 2010. While these efforts continue, we will rely on additional substantive procedures and other measures as needed to assist us with meeting the objectives otherwise fulfilled by an effective control environment.

2225

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On May 1, 2008, the former owners of Preheat, Inc., which we acquired in February 2006, filed a lawsuit in federal court (the “Federal Suit”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana in Lafayette, Louisiana, against us, our directors, our current Chief Executive Officer, our current Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, one of our investment advisors, and a principal of the investment advisor. The Federal Suit sought, among other things, (i) a declaratory judgment that the Preheat purchase agreement executed in December 2005 is null because of alleged inducement to enter into the purchase agreement by criminal or fraudulent conduct, securities fraud and bad faith breach of the purchase agreement and that one of the former owner’s ERISA rights be clarified, (ii) injunctive relief to halt alleged securities disclosure violations by us and to remove three board members, and (iii) damages resulting from the nullification of the Preheat purchase agreement. The Federal Suit has been dismissed. Subsequent to this dismissal, the former owners of Preheat filed a lawsuit in the 16^th Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberia, situated in New Iberia, Louisiana. This lawsuit sought essentially the same relief as requested in the Federal Suit, named many of the same defendants as the Federal Suit, and contained many of the same allegations as the Federal Suit. We, together with the other defendants, filed a motion to dismiss the suit based upon the fact that it was filed in the wrong venue. A ruling was issued dismissing the case on that basis, and a judgment reflecting that ruling has been submitted to the trial judge for signature. At this point, we are unable to assess the ultimate impact of this litigation on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We, together with the other defendants, have filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit and that motion remains pending with the court. We believe the claims against us are without merit and are vigorously contesting the legal action.

Six purported class action lawsuits have been filed in connection with the Merger in state courts in Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, and two purported class actions were filed in connection with the Merger in the federal district court for the Western District of Louisiana. Each court action named the Company and its directors as defendants, and the state court actions also named Wellspring, Parent and Acquisition. One of the federal actions filed named Parent and Acquisition as defendants. The state court complaints allege, among other things, that the director defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders of the Company by entering into the Merger Agreement, failing to disclose certain information with respect to the Company and failing to maximize shareholder value. The Wellspring entities are claimed to have aided and abetted the alleged fiduciary duty breaches by the directors of the Company. The federal court complaints make substantially the same claims as the state court complaints, but also allege violations of federal law relating to the Company’s proxy statement disclosures. One or more of the complaints seek injunctions against the Merger, rescission of the Merger if it is consummated, imposition of a constructive trust, damages, attorneys’ fees, expenses and other relief. The complaints request class action certification and rulings that the named complainants are representatives of the class. No class has been certified at present. Plaintiffs in certain of the state actions and both federal actions have moved for expedited discovery. The defendants have filed the appropriate motions in the state proceedings to consolidate them into a single proceeding and further to stay such state actions pending the federal court’s consideration of the federal suit. A hearing is set for August 30, 2010, as to the motions filed in state court. Moreover, the defendants are contesting discovery requests made by some of the state plaintiffs. The defendants have also filed a motion in the federal court requesting consolidation of the federal actions, a state of all proceedings until lead plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel are appointed and defendants’ motion to dismiss is resolved, and requesting that outstanding discovery requests be quashed. No hearing date has yet been set regarding this motion. The Company believes that all of the lawsuits that have been filed and the allegations contained therein are without merit, and it, along with the directors of the Company, intends to vigorously defend the lawsuits.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from our risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our 2009 Form 10-K/A ~~filed with the SEC on August 26, 2010~~. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider these risk factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our 2009 Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on August 26, 2010 and our subsequent filings with the ~~Securities~~SEC ~~and Exchange Commission~~ are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

See the Company’s Current ~~Reports~~Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on ~~January 19, 2010, January 28, 2010, February 3, 2010 and~~ August 26, 2010.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.

REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits

31.1		Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

32.2		Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

2426

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.
Dated: September 1, 2010		/S/ BRIAN J. RECATTO
Dated: September 7, 2010		/S/ BRIAN J. RECATTO
		Brian J. Recatto
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: September 1, 2010		/S/ RONALD D. MOGEL
Dated: September 7, 2010		/S/ RONALD D. MOGEL
		Ronald D. Mogel
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

2527

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP