UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-24539

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

65-0632092

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

Three Ravinia Drive

Atlanta, GA

30346

(Address of principal executive offices)

(404) 847-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Shares outstanding as of ~~April~~July 30, 2010
Common Stock, $0.01 par value		57,~~450~~663,~~620~~392

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

For the period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

Table of Contents

Part I.	Financial Information	3
Item 1.	Financial Statements - Unaudited	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) - As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) - As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) - For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) - For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) - For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) - For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1314
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2327
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2428
Part II.	Other Information	2529
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2529
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2529
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3759
Item 6.	Exhibits	3860
Signatures		3961
Certifications

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)

	As of
	March 31,2010			December 31,2009
	June 30,2010			December 31,2009
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~118~~143,~~668~~284		$	123,160
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,855 in 2010 and $2,994 in 2009		113,141			111,712
Restricted cash		2,495			—
Prepaid expenses		26,895			26,832
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,436 in 2010 and $2,994 in 2009		120,421			111,712
Other current assets		3,484			4,250
Receivable from sale of investments		17,175			—
Total current assets		262,188			265,954
Prepaid expenses		28,042			26,832
Long-term investments		81,395			85,988
Other current assets		1,932			4,250
Total current assets		313,349			265,954
Long-term investments		37,345			85,988
Property and equipment:
Property and equipment		~~167~~174,~~598~~103			160,923
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(~~109~~112,~~036~~209	)		(104,344	)
Property and equipment, net		5861,~~562~~894			56,579
Capitalized software development costs, net		5654,~~123~~282			51,889
Acquired technology, net		2724,~~079~~602			29,557
Intangible assets, net		65,~~699~~988			7,411
Goodwill		100,008			100,008
Deferred tax assets		8279,~~200~~145			86,639
Other assets		1211,~~105~~835			13,039
Total assets	$	~~686~~688,~~359~~448		$	697,064
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Deferred revenue	$	~~138~~141,~~790~~415		$	135,185
Accounts payable		1422,~~389~~300			14,752
Accrued compensation costs		2421,~~568~~624			34,034
Deferred tax liabilities		6,033			6,033
Other current liabilities		18,~~582~~279			20,994
Total current liabilities		~~202~~209,~~362~~651			210,998
Deferred revenue		34,~~892~~127			4,896
Long-term debt and capital leases		~~15,676~~594			29,727
Other long-term liabilities		1516,~~761~~113			15,616
Total liabilities		~~237~~230,~~691~~485			261,237
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value - 5,000,000 shares authorized; no share issued or outstanding		—			—
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value - 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 57,423,573 and 57,162,466 issued and oustanding, respectively		574			572
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 57,622,727 and 57,162,466 issued and oustanding, respectively		576			572
Additional paid-in capital		~~605~~612,~~876~~142			599,111
Accumulated deficit		(~~156~~154,~~578~~941	)		(162,004	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,204	)		(1,852	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		186			(1,852	)
Total stockholders’ equity		~~448~~457,~~668~~963			435,827
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	~~686~~688,~~359~~448		$	697,064

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	For the Three MonthsEnded March 31,
	For the Three MonthsEnded June 30,						For the Six MonthsEnded June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenues:
Systems and services	$	~~125~~131,~~557~~480		$	~~128~~127,~~137~~675		$	257,037		$	255,812
Hardware		2,~~803~~962			2,~~029~~173			5,765			4,202
Total revenues		~~128~~134,~~360~~442			~~130~~129,~~166~~848			262,802			260,014
Costs and expenses:
Cost of systems and services (excluding depreciation and amortization shown below)		6571,~~199~~208			6668,~~874~~315			136,407			135,189
Cost of hardware		2,~~452~~412			1,~~656~~950			4,864			3,606
Sales and marketing		1917,~~748~~293			2227,~~751~~394			37,041			50,144
Research and development		1317,~~461~~229			13,~~493~~872			30,690			27,364
General and administrative		812,~~567~~321			12,~~021~~429			20,888			24,451
Restructuring		—			~~5,434~~—			—			5,434
Depreciation and amortization		8,~~226~~564			8,~~034~~117			16,790			16,152
Total costs and expenses		~~117~~129,~~653~~027			~~130~~132,~~263~~077			246,680			262,340
Income (loss) from operations		105,~~707~~415			(972,229	)		16,122			(2,326	)
Gain on sale of assets		—			~~400~~838			—			1,237
Loss on investments, net		(226	)		(158	)
Gain (loss) on investments, net		(1,573	)		691			(1,799	)		533
Interest income		~~417~~372			~~847~~681			789			1,528
Interest expense		(~~344~~267	)		(~~1,143~~961	)		(611	)		(2,105	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		103,~~554~~947			(~~151~~980	)		14,501			(1,133	)
Provision for income taxes		52,~~128~~310			~~714~~3,120			7,438			3,834
Net income (loss)	$	51,~~426~~637		$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,063		$	(4,967	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	51,~~426~~637		$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,063		$	(4,967	)
Less: Income allocated to participating securities		317			—			35			—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	51,~~395~~630		$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,028		$	(4,967	)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		5657,~~838~~208			55,~~470~~710			57,024			55,588
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.0903		$	(0.0207	)	$	0.12		$	(0.09	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	51,~~426~~637		$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,063		$	(4,967	)
Less: Income allocated to participating securities		307			—			35			—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	51,~~396~~630		$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,028		$	(4,967	)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		5657,~~838~~208			55,~~470~~710			57,024			55,588
Dilutive effect of potential common shares		~~891~~862			—			879			—
Diluted weighted average shares common outstanding		5758,~~729~~070			55,~~470~~710			57,903			55,588
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.0903		$	(0.0207	)	$	0.12		$	(0.09	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	For the Six MonthsEnded June 30,
	2010			2009
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	57,~~426~~063		$	(~~865~~4,967	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1227,~~336~~360			1224,~~035~~833
Provision for bad debts		~~450~~900			1,~~046~~996
Stock compensation expense		37,~~681~~395			411,~~408~~169
Unrealized loss on investments, net		226			158
(Gain) loss on investments, net		1,799			(533	)
Gain on sale of assets		—			(~~400~~1,237	)
Deferred provision for income taxes		46,~~545~~372			~~452~~3,674
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(19,~~470~~427	)		31,~~695~~948
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		~~659~~892			(1,~~454~~580	)
Other assets		~~704~~702			(~~237~~497	)
Deferred revenue		25,~~531~~933			(~~807~~3,631	)
Accrued compensation		(912,~~437~~395	)		78,~~465~~633
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		~~(3,809~~483	)		(6,~~596~~888	)
Other long-term liabilities		27485			~~751~~1,565
Other		885			85108
Total adjustments		1030,~~451~~584			2042,~~601~~720
Net cash provided by operating activities		1537,~~877~~647			1937,~~736~~753
Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(612,~~661~~191	)		(712,~~273~~555	)
Proceeds from sales and redemptions of investments		432,~~575~~474			150
Capitalized software development costs		(812,~~091~~456	)		(714,~~216~~651	)
Earnout on disposition		—			842
Increase in restricted cash		(2,495	)		—
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(2,763	)
Earnout on disposition		—			1,241
Net cash used in investing activities		(10,177	)		(16,260	)
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(2,819	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		5,332			(28,634	)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from stock options exercised		35,~~431~~999			743,306
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		~~201~~375			~~242~~454
Repayment of secured financings		(1429,000	)		—
Other		(48147	)		—(59	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(1022,~~416~~773	)		~~316~~3,701
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		~~224~~(82	)		(~~214~~199	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(420,~~492~~124	)		312,~~578~~621
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		123,160			108,304
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	~~118~~143,~~668~~284		$	~~111~~120,~~882~~925
Non-cash investing activities:
Funds from sale of investments not collected	$	17,175		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE A – PREPARATION OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In these notes, Eclipsys Corporation and its subsidiaries are referred to as “the Company” or “Eclipsys.”

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared based upon U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that permit reduced disclosure for interim periods. In the Company’s opinion, these statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

Revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities can vary during each quarter of the year. Therefore, the results and trends in these interim financial statements may not be indicative of annual results. For a more complete discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies and other information, this report should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 that was filed with the SEC on February 25, 2010.

The Company manages its business as one reportable segment.

NOTE B – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated guidance that amends existing revenue recognition accounting pronouncements that have multiple element arrangements. This updated guidance provides accounting principles and application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. This new approach is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010 and may be applied retrospectively or prospectively for new or materially modified arrangements. In addition, early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2010 did not have an impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued updated guidance related to certain arrangements that contain software elements, which amends revenue recognition to exclude tangible products that include software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality. This updated guidance will be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted as of the beginning of a company’s fiscal year provided the company has not previously issued financial statements for any period within that year. An entity shall not elect early application of this update unless it also elects early application of the update related to multiple element arrangements. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2010 did not have an impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE C – ~~EARNINGS~~MERGER ~~(LOSS) PER SHARE~~

On June 9, 2010, Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (“Allscripts”) and Eclipsys announced a definitive agreement to merge in an all-stock transaction. Allscripts is the leading provider of clinical software, information and connectivity solutions for physicians. Under terms of the merger agreement, Eclipsys stockholders will receive 1.2 shares of Allscripts stock for each share of Eclipsys stock owned. The consummation of the merger is subject to various conditions including regulatory and shareholder approval and other conditions including the repurchase by Allscripts of 24.4 million Allscripts shares owned by Misys plc and the sale in a public offering of no fewer than 25 million Allscripts shares held by Misys plc. The Company incurred $3.4 million of additional expenses through June 30, 2010, for legal, banking, accounting, and consulting services related to this transaction.

NOTE D – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

For all periods presented, basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share (“EPS”) is presented using the two-class method, which requires that basic earnings (loss) per common share be calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

Non-vested restricted stock granted prior to April 1, 2009 carries non-forfeitable dividend rights and is therefore a participating security. Non-vested restricted stock granted subsequent to March 31, 2009 carries forfeitable dividend rights and is, therefore, not considered a participating security. The two-class method of computing earnings per share is required for companies with participating shares. Under this method, net income is allocated to common stock and participating securities to the extent that each security may share in earnings, as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed. ~~The Company has~~ accounted for non-vested restricted stock granted prior to April 1, 2009 as a participating security and has used the two class method of computing earnings per share. Because the Company does not pay dividends, earnings allocated to each participating security and share of common stock are equal. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company was in a net loss position and therefore did not allocate any loss to participating securities.

Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential dilution from assumed conversion of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. When the effect of the outstanding equity securities is anti-dilutive, they are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The Company has accounted for non-vested restricted stock granted prior to April 1, 2009 as a participating security and has used the two class method of computing earnings per share. Because the Company does not pay dividends, earnings allocated to each participating security and share of common stock are equal. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company was in a net loss position and therefore did not allocate any loss to participating securities.

The computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,					Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2010		2009			2010		2009
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss)	$	51,~~426~~637	$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,063	$	(4,967	)
Less: Income allocated to participating securities		317		—			35		—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	51,~~395~~630	$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,028	$	(4,967	)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		57,~~161~~457		55,~~470~~710			57,311		55,588
Less: Participating securities		~~323~~249		—			287		—
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		5657,~~838~~208		55,~~470~~710			57,024		55,588
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.0903	$	(0.0207	)	$	0.12	$	(0.09	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss)	$	51,~~426~~637	$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,063	$	(4,967	)
Less: Income allocated to participating securities		307		—			35		—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	51,~~396~~630	$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	7,028	$	(4,967	)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		5657,~~838~~208		55,~~470~~710			57,024		55,588
Dilutive portion of potential common shares		~~891~~862		—			879		—
Diluted weighted average shares common outstanding		5758,~~729~~070		55,~~470~~710			57,903		55,588
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.0903	$	(0.0207	)	$	0.12	$	(0.09	)
Anti-dilutive share excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share		3,196		5,367
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share		2,582		4,551			2,673		4,825

NOTE DE – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, consists of the following (in thousands):

	As of
	March 31,2010		December 31,2009
	June 30,2010		December 31,2009
Accounts Receivable:
Billed accounts receivable, net	$	8196,~~266~~505	$	82,110
Unbilled accounts receivable, net		3123,~~875~~916		29,602
Total accounts receivable, net	$	~~113~~120,~~141~~421	$	111,712

NOTE E – LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS

The fair value of investment securities were as follows (in thousands):

	As of
	March 31,2010		December 31,2009
Available for sales securities:
Goldman Sachs purchased auction rate securities (“ARS”)	$	50,147	$	49,939
Trading securities:
UBS Financial Services purchased ARS		29,039		33,403
ARS put option		2,209		2,646
Total trading securities		31,248		36,049
Total long-term investments	$	81,395	$	85,988

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~The~~NOTE ~~changes~~F in– ~~market~~LONG-TERM ~~value~~INVESTMENTS of available for sale securities are recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive loss caption in the stockholders’ equity section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, until the Company disposes of them. Once these securities are disposed of, either by sale or maturity, any realized loss is reported in loss on investments, net. The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflects gross proceeds from sales or redemptions of available for sale securities as investing activities.

~~Changes~~The infair ~~the market~~ value of ~~trading~~investment securities ~~are~~were ~~recorded in loss on investments, net, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations~~ as ~~they~~ ~~occur.~~follows ~~The~~(in ~~Condensed~~thousands): Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflects gross proceeds from sales or redemptions of trading securities as investing cash flows since the securities are illiquid with no established market and are not used for operating activities.


	As of
	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Available for sale securities:
Goldman Sachs purchased auction rate securities (“ARS”)	$	37,345	$	49,939
Trading securities:
UBS Financial Services purchased ARS		—		33,403
ARS put option		—		2,646

Total trading securities		—		36,049

Total long-term investments	$	37,345	$	85,988

The changes in market value of available for sale securities are recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) caption in the stockholders’ equity section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, until the Company disposes of them. Once these securities are disposed of, either by sale or redemption, any realized gain or loss is reported in gain (loss) on investments, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflects gross proceeds from sales or redemptions of available for sale securities as investing activities.

Changes in the market value of trading securities are recorded in gain (loss) on investments, net, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as they occur. The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflects gross proceeds from sales or redemptions of trading securities as investing cash flows since the securities are illiquid with no established market and are not used for operating activities.

The par values of investments in ARS were as follows (in thousands):

	As of
	March 31,2010		December 31,2009
	June 30,2010		December 31,2009
UBS:
AAA rated pool of student loans	$	~~28,025~~—	$	32,275
A3 rated pool of student loans		~~3,150~~—		3,475
UBS		~~31,175~~—		35,750
Goldman Sachs:
AAA rated pool of student loans		40,050		40,050
Baa2 rated pool of student loans		~~15,400~~—		15,400
Goldman Sachs UBS		5540,~~450~~050		55,450
Total par value of ARS	$	8640,~~625~~050	$	91,200

These investments have long-term nominal maturities for which the interest rates are supposed to be reset through a Dutch auction each month. Prior to February 2008, monthly auctions provided a liquid market for these securities. However, in February 2008, the broker-dealers managing the Company’s ARS portfolio experienced failed auctions in which the amount of ARS submitted for sale exceeded the amount of purchase orders. The Company’s ARS continued to fail to settle at auctions through the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010. The Company continues to earn interest on these investments at the contractual rate.

On November 12, 2008, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with UBS pursuant to which the Company (1) received the right (the “put option”) to sell the ARS, originally purchased through UBS, at par value, to UBS between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012 and (2) gave UBS the right to purchase the ARS, originally purchased through UBS, from the Company any time after the acceptance date of the settlement agreement as long as the Company receives the par value of the securities. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, UBS purchased $14.0 million of ARS at par from the Company. On June 30, 2010, the Company exercised its right to sell the remaining $17.2 million of ARS to UBS at par. At June 30, 2010, the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include a current receivable from sale of investments of $17.2 million. The exercise of the option settled and the cash was received on July 1, 2010.

The Company has accounted for the put option as a freestanding financial instrument and elected to record the value under the fair value option. The Company has classified the related UBS purchased ARS as trading securities. Although the underlying credit quality of UBS will impact the future value of the put option and could cause the put option to decrease in fair value and not offset the change in fair value of the UBS purchased ARS, the Company expects that the future changes in the fair value of the put option will over time generally offset the fair value movements in the related UBS purchased ARS.

The put option becomes exercisable on June 30, 2010. Although the Company currently anticipates that it will exercise the put option on the date it becomes exercisable, the Company is not required to do so. In addition, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to recover the entire investment because the individual securities are illiquid and the Company is still subject to the credit risk that UBS may not be able to perform under the terms of the put option. Accordingly, the Company has classified the UBS portfolio as a non-current asset on its balance sheet as a component of long-term investments.

As of March 31, 2010, the Company has recorded these investments, including the put option, at their estimated fair value. All of the ARS were at an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2010. See Note I – Fair Value Measurement for further information regarding the valuation of the ARS.

In evaluating its ARS purchased from Goldman Sachs for other than temporary impairment, as of March 31, 2010, the Company considered a number of qualitative factors such as: the loans are sufficiently collateralized; all of the underlying student loans in the Goldman Sachs’ portfolio are guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”);

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~there~~The ~~have~~put ~~been~~option ~~principal~~had ~~repayments~~been ofaccounted ~~some~~for ofas ~~the~~a ~~securities~~freestanding tofinancial ~~investors;~~instrument with the ~~Company~~fair ~~continues~~value tobeing recorded ~~earn~~under ~~interest on~~ the ~~securities~~fair atvalue ~~market~~option. ~~rates;~~The ~~and~~UBS ~~there~~purchased ~~was continued evidence of improvement in the secondary market for~~ ARS ~~during~~were ~~the~~classified ~~first~~as ~~quarter~~trading ~~of 2010~~securities. ~~Management~~The ~~believes~~resulting ~~these~~unrealized ~~investments~~gain/loss ~~continue to be~~ of ~~high~~both ~~credit quality and expects to recover~~ the ~~securities’~~fair ~~entire~~value ~~amortized~~adjustment ~~cost~~of ~~basis. In addition,~~ the ~~Company~~ ~~does~~UBS ~~not~~ARS ~~currently~~and ~~intend to sell~~ the ~~securities,~~fair ~~unless~~value itof ~~receives an unsolicited offer, which~~ the ~~Company~~UBS ~~considers~~put ~~favorable~~option atis ~~that~~recorded ~~time.~~in ~~More~~gain (loss) ~~likely~~on ~~than not~~investment, ~~the~~net. ~~Company~~As ~~will~~a ~~not~~result beof ~~required to sell~~ the ~~securities~~transactions ~~before~~noted ~~recovering its cost. Accordingly~~above, the Company ~~has~~recorded ~~classified~~a ~~these~~loss ~~securities~~on ~~as long-term~~ investments inof ~~its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets~~$0.1 ~~The~~million ~~Company has concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment losses, including any credit loss, occurred~~ for the ~~three~~second ~~months ended March 31~~quarter, ~~2010.~~which ~~The~~was ~~Company~~comprised ~~will~~of ~~continue~~the toreversal ~~analyze~~of ~~its~~the ~~ARS~~UBS ~~purchased~~put ~~from~~option ~~Goldman~~valuation ~~Sachs~~of ~~each~~$2.2 ~~reporting~~million ~~period~~offset ~~for impairment, and it may be required to record an impairment charge in~~ by the ~~Condensed~~reversal ~~Consolidated Statements~~ of ~~Operations if~~ the fair value adjustment of the ~~Goldman~~UBS ~~Sachs purchased~~ ARS ~~declines,~~of ~~and~~$2.1 ~~the decline is determined to be other-than-temporary~~million.

~~NOTE~~In Fevaluating –its ~~ACQUIRED~~ARS ~~TECHNOLOGY~~purchased ~~AND~~from ~~INTANGIBLE~~Goldman ~~ASSETS~~Sachs for other than temporary impairment, ~~INCLUDING~~as ~~GOODWILL~~of June 30, 2010, the Company considered a number of qualitative factors such as: the loans are sufficiently collateralized; all of the underlying student loans in the Goldman Sachs’ portfolio are guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”); there have been principal repayments of some of the securities to investors; the Company continues to earn interest on the securities at market rates; and there was continued evidence of improvement in the secondary market for ARS during the second quarter of 2010. Management believes these investments continue to be of high credit quality and expects to recover the securities’ entire amortized cost basis. In addition, the Company does not currently intend to sell the securities, unless it receives an unsolicited offer, which the Company considers favorable at that time. More likely than not, the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovering its cost. Accordingly, the Company has classified these securities as long-term investments in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment losses, including any credit loss, occurred for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

In April 2010, as a result of unsolicited offers, the Company sold $15.4 million in par value of these ARS for $13.9 million. The ~~gross~~realized loss on this sale was $1.5 million and is included in gain (loss) on investments, net. ~~amounts~~The ~~for~~Company ~~intangible~~will ~~assets~~continue to analyze its ARS purchased from Goldman Sachs each reporting period for impairment, and ~~goodwill~~it ~~consist~~may be required to record an impairment charge in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations if the ~~following~~fair ~~(in~~value ~~thousands):~~of the Goldman Sachs purchased ARS declines, and the decline is determined to be other-than-temporary.

	As of March 31, 2010							As of December 31, 2009
	GrossCarryingAmount		AccumulatedAmortization			Net BookValue		GrossCarryingAmount		AccumulatedAmortization			Net BookValue		EstimatedLife
Intangibles subject to amortization
Acquired technology	$	43,060	$	(15,981	)	$	27,079	$	43,060	$	(13,503	)	$	29,557	3-5 years
Ongoing customer relationships		9,409		(3,543	)		5,866		9,409		(3,110	)		6,299	5-6 years
Non-compete agreements		2,640		(1,867	)		773		2,640		(1,588	)		1,052	2-3 years
Total	$	55,109	$	(21,391	)	$	33,718	$	55,109	$	(18,201	)	$	36,908
Intangibles not subject to amortization:
Trade names						$	60						$	60
Goodwill							100,008							100,008
Total						$	100,068						$	100,068

Goodwill has been recorded in U.S dollars only and is not amortized. Eclipsys has only one reporting unit for which all goodwill is assigned. Impairment tests for goodwill include comparing Eclipsys’ fair value to the comparable carrying value, including goodwill. No impairment has been identified or recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2010 or March 31, 2009.

NOTE G – TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The components of total comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):

	For theThree Months EndedMarch 31,
	2010		2009
Net income (loss)	$	5,426	$	(865	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		478		(358	)
Net change in unrealized holding loss, net of tax		170		(1,104	)
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	6,074	$	(2,327	)

NOTE H – RESTRUCTURING

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company executed a workforce reduction which included terminating the employment of approximately 175 employees, including staff in its services and client solutions organizations to better align with current and projected business volumes, and other workforce reductions across various businesses and back office divisions. These reductions, together with severance costs resulting from the departure of an executive officer of approximately $0.6 million, resulted in a total charge of $5.4 million for severance related costs to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of March 31, 2010, $5.3 million of these costs have been paid by the Company and the remaining accrued liability is $0.1 million.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE IG – ~~FAIR~~ACQUIRED ~~VALUE~~TECHNOLOGY ~~MEASUREMENT~~AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, INCLUDING GOODWILL

The gross and net amounts for intangible assets and goodwill consist of the following (in thousands):


	As of June 30, 2010							As of December 31, 2009							Estimated Life
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value		Estimated Life
Intangibles subject to amortization
Acquired technology	$	43,060	$	(18,458	)	$	24,602	$	43,060	$	(13,503	)	$	29,557	3-5 years
Ongoing customer relationships		9,409		(3,974	)		5,435		9,409		(3,110	)		6,299	5-6 years
Non-compete agreements		2,640		(2,147	)		493		2,640		(1,588	)		1,052	2-3 years

Total	$	55,109	$	(24,579	)	$	30,530	$	55,109	$	(18,201	)	$	36,908

Intangibles not subject to amortization:
Trade names						$	60						$	60
Goodwill							100,008							100,008

Total						$	100,068						$	100,068

Goodwill has been recorded in U.S dollars only and is not amortized. Eclipsys has only one reporting unit for which all goodwill is assigned. Impairment tests for goodwill include comparing the Eclipsys fair value to the comparable carrying value, including goodwill. No impairment has been identified or recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2010 or the year ended December 31, 2009.

NOTE H – TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The components of total comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010		2009
Net income (loss)	$	1,637		$	(4,100	)	$	7,063	$	(4,967	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(104	)		997			374		1,658
Net change in unrealized holding loss, net of tax		1,493			1,742			1,664		639

Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	3,026		$	(1,361	)	$	9,101	$	(2,670	)

NOTE I – RESTRUCTURING

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company executed a workforce reduction which included terminating the employment of approximately 175 employees, including staff in its services and client solutions organizations to better align with current and projected business volumes, and other workforce reductions across various businesses and back office divisions. These reductions, together with severance costs resulting from the departure of an executive officer of approximately $0.6 million, resulted in a total charge of $5.4 million for severance related costs to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2010, all of these costs have been paid by the Company with no remaining liability.

NOTE J – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

Investments

The Company measures its financial assets at fair value in accordance with the fair value framework, which requires the categorization of assets into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to determine the estimated fair value of the assets. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

•

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

•

Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets in inactive markets.

•

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in estimating the value of the asset.

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):

	Balance as ofMarch 31, 2010		Quoted Prices inActive Markets ForIdentical Assets(Level 1)		Significant OtherObservable Inputs(Level 2)		UnobservableInputs(Level 3)
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	69,768	$	69,768	$	—	$	—
Long-term investments
Auction rate securities		79,186		—		—		79,186
Put option		2,209		—		—		2,209
	$	151,163	$	69,768	$	—	$	81,395

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

	Balance as ofDecember 31, 2009		Quoted Prices inActive Markets ForIdentical Assets(Level 1)		Significant OtherObservable Inputs(Level 2)		UnobservableInputs(Level 3)
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	80,585	$	80,585	$	—	$	—
Long-term investments
Auction rate securities		83,342		—		—		83,342
Put option		2,646		—		—		2,646
	$	166,573	$	80,585	$	—	$	85,988

The Company has recorded the investments categorized as Level 1 at their estimated fair value. These investments consist of money market funds which are valued daily by the fund companies. The valuation is based on the publicly reported net asset value of each fund.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 (in thousands):


	Balance as of June 30, 2010		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	88,505	$	88,505	$	—	$	—
Long-term investments
Auction rate securities		37,345		—		—		37,345

	$	125,850	$	88,505	$	—	$	37,345

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):


	Balance as of December 31, 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	80,585	$	80,585	$	—	$	—
Long-term investments
Auction rate securities		83,342		—		—		83,342
Put option		2,646		—		—		2,646

	$	166,573	$	80,585	$	—	$	85,988

The Company has recorded the investments categorized as Level 3 at their estimated fair value. Due to events in the credit markets, quoted prices in active markets are not readily available for the ARS and put option. The Company estimated the fair value of these ARS based on various factors using a trinomial discount model. The model considers possible cash flows and probabilities which are forecasted under a number of potential scenarios. Each scenario’s cash flow is multiplied by the probability of that scenario occurring. The major inputs are as follows: forecasted maximum interest rates, probability of passing auction or early redemption, probability of failing auction, probability of default at auction, severity of default, and the discount rate. The Company also considered the credit quality and duration of the securities. The Company accounted for illiquidity by using a discount rate within the valuation, with an additional spread representing the additional rates of return investors would require for certain securities to hold those securities in an illiquid environment. The UBS put option was valued using a valuation approach for forward contracts in which one party agrees to sell a financial instrument to another party at a particular time for a particular price. In this approach, the present value of all expected future cash flows are subtracted from the current fair value of the security. The resulting value is calculated as a future value at an interest rate reflective of counterparty risk. There have not been any changes in the Company’s valuation model for ARS and the put option from December 31, 2009.

The assumptions that were used to determine the fair value estimates of the ARS and put option were highly subjective and therefore considered Level 3 unobservable inputs in the fair value hierarchy. ~~The~~As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of these assets represents $8137.43 million or 5329.87% of total assets measured at fair value. The estimate of the fair value of the ARS the Company holds could change significantly based on future market conditions.

The following table presents the Company’s activity for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs - Level 3 (in thousands):

	Auction RateSecurities			Auction RateSecurities PutOptions			Total
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	83,342		$	2,646		$	85,988
Total gains/(losses):
Included in loss on investments, net (realized)		—			—			—
Included in loss on investments, net (unrealized)		211			(437	)		(226	)
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		208			—			208
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		(4,575	)		—			(4,575	)
Transfers out of Level 3		—			—			—
Balance at March 31, 2010	$	79,186		$	2,209		$	81,395

Unrealized gains and losses included in loss on investments, net, on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are related to the changes in ARS purchased through UBS that are classified as trading securities and are still held as of March 31, 2010. Gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are related to the changes in ARS purchased through Goldman Sachs that are classified as available for sale and are still held as of March 31, 2010.

Debt

The fair value of the Company’s bank debt approximates the carrying value of $15.0 million due to the nature of its revolving line of credit financing arrangement with a variable interest rate and a maturity date of August 26, 2011. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company repaid $14.0 million of revolving long-term debt outstanding under the Company’s credit facility.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~NOTE~~The Jfollowing –table ~~INCOME~~presents ~~TAXES~~the Company’s activity for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs - Level 3 (in thousands):


	Auction Rate Securities			Auction Rate Securities Put Options			Total
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	83,342		$	2,646		$	85,988
Total gains/(losses):
Included in loss on investments, net (realized)		(1,501	)					(1,501	)
Included in loss on investments, net (unrealized)		2,348			(2,646	)		(298	)
Included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		2,805						2,805
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		(49,649	)					(49,649	)
Transfers out of Level 3		—						—

Balance at June 30, 2010	$	37,345		$	—		$	37,345

Gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are related to the changes in ARS purchased through Goldman Sachs that are classified as available for sale and are still held as of June 30, 2010.

NOTE K – INCOME TAXES

Income tax provisions for interim periods are based on estimated annual income for the year at the statutory income tax rates in effect at the time, adjusted to reflect the effects of any significant infrequent or unusual items which are required to be discretely recognized within the current interim period. The Company’s intention is to permanently reinvest its foreign earnings outside of the United States. As a result, the effective tax rates in the periods presented are largely based upon the forecasted pretax earnings mix and allocation of certain expenses in various taxing jurisdictions where the Company conducts its business that utilizes a broad range of statutory income tax rates.

The effective tax rate was 4858.65% and 51.3% for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and was negative for the three and six months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2009. The tax rates for these periods were based on the forecasted pretax earnings mix by jurisdiction of Eclipsys and its subsidiaries after considering any discrete items in the interim periods. The effective rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was higher than statutory rates primarily due to the tax effect of share-based compensation shortfalls. The negative effective tax rate for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 was impacted by the pre-tax loss for the quarter and the respective shortfall for share-based compensation awards to the extent that the cumulative recognized book stock compensation expense for that award exceeded the associated tax deductions. The 48.6% effective rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was higher than statutory rates primarily due to the tax effect of share-based compensation shortfalls and deemed dividend distributions from foreign subsidiaries.

~~NOTE~~During Kthe –three ~~CONTINGENCIES~~and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company expensed $3.4 million of transaction costs related to the proposed merger with Allscripts. When the merger is consummated, the Company will review these costs and may be required to adjust the related deferred tax asset.

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company~~L ~~and~~– ~~its~~CONTINGENCIES subsidiaries are from time to time parties to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims incident to their business activities. Such matters may include, among other things, assertions of contract breach or intellectual property infringement, claims for indemnity arising in the course of the Company’s business and claims by persons whose employment with us has been terminated. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. Consequently, management is unable to ascertain the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability, amounts which may be covered by insurance or recoverable from third parties, or the financial impact with respect to these other matters as of March 31, 2010. However, based on management’s knowledge, management believes that the final resolution of such other matters pending at the time of this report, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~NOTE~~On Lor –about June 15, ~~SUBSEQUENT~~2010, ~~EVENTS~~Rajesh Nama, on behalf of himself and the public stockholders of Eclipsys, filed a purported class action complaint in the Superior Court of DeKalb County, State of Georgia, captioned Nama v. Pead, et al. The lawsuit names Allscripts, Arsenal Merger Corp. (“Arsenal”), Eclipsys, and each of the directors of Eclipsys as defendants. On or about June 17, 2010, John Scoggins, on behalf of himself and the public stockholders of Eclipsys, filed a second purported class action complaint in the same court and against the same defendants (except not Arsenal) captioned Scoggins v. Eclipsys Corp., et al. On or about June 18, 2010, Colleen Witmer, on behalf of herself and the public stockholders of Eclipsys, filed a third purported class action complaint in the same court and against the same defendants as the first case and captioned Witmer v. Casey, et al. On or about June 22, 2010, Michael Hiers, on behalf of himself and the public stockholders of Eclipsys, filed a fourth purported class action complaint in the same court and against the same parties as the first case and captioned Hiers v. Casey, et al. On or about June 22, 2010, the Iron Workers of Western Pennsylvania Pension Plan, on behalf of itself and the public stockholders of Eclipsys, filed a fifth purported class action complaint in the Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia, and against the same defendants as the first case (except not Allscripts or Arsenal) and captioned Iron Workers of W. Pennsylvania Pension Plan v. Pead, et al.

During April 2010, the Company repaid $15.0 million of revolving long-term debt outstanding under the Company’s secured credit facility.

In April 2010, as a result of unsolicited offers, the Company sold $15.4 million of available for sale ARS for $13.9 million. The realized loss of $1.5 million will be recorded in the second quarter of 2010.

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

On or about June 30, 2010, the plaintiff in the Iron Workers case dismissed its complaint in the Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia and refiled its complaint in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia. On or about July 9, 2010, the plaintiff in the Iron Workers case filed an Amended Complaint. On or about July 9, 2010, Jody Madala, individually and on behalf of the public stockholders of Eclipsys, filed a sixth purported class action complaint in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia against the same defendants as the first case (except not Allscripts or Arsenal) captioned Madala v. Pead et al.

The lawsuits allege, among other things, that the Eclipsys directors breached their fiduciary duties and that Eclipsys aided and abetted those breaches. The two lawsuits first filed in Gwinnett County contain allegations that the joint proxy statement/prospectus/information statement on Form S-4 filed by Allscripts and Eclipsys with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the merger of the Company with Allscripts is materially misleading in certain respects, including the alleged omission of information concerning certain financial projections and whether or how the parties and their financial advisors have accounted for certain proceeds to be paid to Misys in the stock buyback. The four lawsuits originally filed in DeKalb County also allege that Allscripts aided and abetted such alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the directors of Eclipsys. Based on these allegations, the lawsuits seek, among other relief, injunctive relief enjoining the merger, and certain lawsuits seek damages in the alternative. They also purport to seek recovery of the costs of the action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. Based on the facts known to date, the defendants believe that the claims asserted against them in these lawsuits are without merit, and the defendants intend to defend themselves vigorously against the claims.

On or about July 12, 2010, the plaintiffs in the Nama and Scoggins actions jointly filed an amended complaint containing additional allegations including allegations concerning allegedly false and misleading statements in the joint proxy statement/prospectus/information statement on Form S-4 relating to, among other things, financial projections, synergies, the financial analyses of the parties’ financial advisors, and the events leading up to the transaction.

On or about July 16, 2010, the Superior Court of DeKalb County ruled that it would transfer all related cases in DeKalb County to the Gwinnett County Superior Court Business Case Division.

On July 22, 2010, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Iron Workers’ amended complaint for failure to state a claim. On July 27, 2010, the Gwinnett County Superior Court Business Case Division granted the defendants’ motion and dismissed with prejudice the Iron Workers’ claims, finding that plaintiff had not stated a colorable claim against any director for breach of fiduciary duty. On July 28, 2010, the Iron Workers filed a motion for reconsideration, which the Gwinnett County Superior Court Business Case Division denied the same day.

On or about July 29, 2010, Iron Workers filed an appeal with the Georgia Court of Appeals seeking to enjoin the meeting of the Company’s stockholders scheduled for August 13, 2010 to vote on the merger of the Company and Allscripts and to expedite the appeals process. The Company filed an opposition brief on August 4, 2010.

Also on or about July 29, 2010, the plaintiffs in the Nama and Scoggins actions jointly filed a motion with the Gwinnett County Superior Court Business Case Division alleging inadequate disclosure in the joint proxy statement/prospectus/ information statement and seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin the meeting of the Company’s stockholders scheduled for August 13, 2010 to vote on the merger of the Company and Allscripts unless and until the defendants agree to provide additional disclosure. The Company has opposed this motion.

In addition to the foregoing, the Company and its subsidiaries are from time to time parties to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims incident to their business activities. Such matters may include, among other things, assertions of contract breach or intellectual property infringement, claims for indemnity arising in the course of the Company’s business and claims by persons whose employment with us has been terminated. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. Consequently, management is unable to ascertain the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability, amounts which may be covered by insurance or recoverable from third parties, or the financial impact with respect to these other matters as of June 30, 2010. However, based on management’s knowledge, management believes that the final resolution of such other matters pending at the time of this report, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our company and our industry. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual outcomes may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted. When used in this report, the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “predict,” “continue,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “believe,” “could,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements may include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our anticipated performance, including revenue, margin, cash flow, balance sheet and profit expectations; development and implementation of our software; duration, size, scope and revenue expectations associated with client contracts; business mix; sales and growth in our client base; market opportunities; industry conditions; performance of our acquisitions; and our accounting, including its effects and potential changes in accounting.

Actual results might differ materially from the results projected or implied by the forward-looking statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in this report under the heading “Risk Factors” and in other filings we make from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

Throughout this report we refer to Eclipsys Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries as “Eclipsys,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our.”

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this report.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

About the Company

Eclipsys is a provider of advanced integrated clinical, revenue cycle and performance management software and related professional services that help healthcare organizations and physicians improve clinical, financial, and operational outcomes. We develop and license proprietary software and content that is designed for use in connection with many of the key clinical, financial and operational functions that healthcare organizations require. Among other things, our software:

•

Enables physicians, nurses and other clinicians to coordinate care through shared electronic medical records, place orders and access and share information about patients;

•

Provides information for use by physicians, nurses and other clinicians through clinical content, which is integrated with our software;

•

Helps our clients optimize the healthcare revenue cycle, including patient admissions, scheduling, invoicing, inventory control and cost accounting; and

•

Supports clinical and financial planning and analysis.

We also provide professional services related to our software. These services include software implementation and maintenance, outsourcing of information technology operations, remote hosting of our software and third-party healthcare information technology applications, technical and user training, and consulting.

With the exception of hardware revenues, we classify our revenues in one caption (systems and services) in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations because the amount of license revenues related to traditional software contracts is less than 10% of total revenues. The remaining revenue types included in this caption relate to bundled subscription arrangements and other services arrangements that have similar attribution patterns for revenue recognition. The revenue items included on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows:

•

Systems and services revenues include revenues derived from a variety of sources, including software licenses, software maintenance, and professional services, which include implementation, training and consulting services, as well as outsourcing and remote hosting of our software. Our systems and services revenues include both recurring software license revenues and software maintenance revenues (both of which are recognized ratably over the contractual term) and license revenues related to “traditional” software contracts (which are generally recognized upon delivery of the software or during the course of implementation and represent less than 10% of total revenues). For some clients, we host the software applications licensed from us remotely on our own servers, which saves these clients the cost of procuring and maintaining hardware and related facilities. For other clients, we offer an outsourced solution in which we assume partial to total responsibility for a healthcare organization’s information technology operations using our employees. Margins on our software license and maintenance revenues are generally significantly higher than margins on our professional services, outsourcing, and remote hosting revenues.

•14 Hardware revenues result from the sale of computer hardware to our clients in connection with their implementation of our software. We purchase this hardware from suppliers and resell it to our clients. As clients elect more remote-hosted solutions, clients’ need for hardware is reduced and future hardware revenues may continue to be negatively impacted. The amount of hardware revenues can vary significantly from period to period. Margins on our hardware revenues are generally significantly lower than margins on our systems and services revenues.

We• ~~market~~Hardware ~~our~~revenues ~~software~~result from the sale of computer hardware to ~~healthcare~~our ~~providers~~clients in connection with their implementation of ~~many~~our ~~different~~software. ~~sizes~~We purchase this hardware from suppliers and ~~specialties,~~resell ~~including~~it ~~community hospitals,~~to ~~large~~our ~~multi-entity~~clients. ~~healthcare~~As ~~systems,~~clients ~~academic~~elect ~~medical~~more ~~centers~~remote-hosted solutions, ~~outpatient~~clients’ ~~clinics~~need for hardware is reduced and ~~physician~~future ~~practices~~hardware revenues may continue to be negatively impacted. AThe ~~number~~amount of ~~the~~hardware ~~top-ranked~~revenues ~~U.S.~~can ~~hospitals~~vary ~~named~~significantly infrom Uperiod to period.S. ~~News &~~Margins ~~World~~on ~~Report’s~~our ~~Honor~~hardware ~~Roll~~revenues ~~use~~are ~~one~~generally orsignificantly ~~more~~lower of than margins on our ~~solutions.~~systems and services revenues.

We ~~continue~~market toour ~~focus~~software onto ~~expanding~~healthcare ~~sales~~providers of ~~our~~many ~~solutions~~different ~~outside~~sizes ofand ~~North America~~specialties, ~~such~~including ascommunity ~~the~~hospitals, ~~Asia~~large multi-~~Pacific~~entity ~~region and the~~healthcare ~~Middle~~systems, ~~East.~~academic Asmedical ~~of March 31~~centers, ~~2010,~~outpatient ~~our~~clinics ~~India operations have expanded to include two offices~~ and ~~approximately~~physician ~~780 employees~~practices. WeA ~~believe~~number ~~that~~of ~~India~~the ~~provides~~top-ranked ~~access~~U.S. tohospitals ~~educated~~named ~~professionals~~in toU.S. ~~work~~News & onWorld ~~software~~Report‘s ~~research,~~Honor ~~development~~Roll ~~and~~use ~~support, as~~one ~~well~~or asmore ~~other~~of ~~functions,~~our ~~at an economical cost~~solutions.

We continue to focus on expanding sales of our solutions outside of North America, such as the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East. As of June 30, 2010, our India operations have expanded to include two offices and approximately 730 employees. We believe that India provides access to educated professionals to work on software research, development and support, as well as other functions, at an economical cost.

Business Environment

Our industry, healthcare information technology, or HIT, is highly competitive and subject to numerous government regulations and industry standards. Sales of Eclipsys’ solutions can be affected significantly by many competitive factors, including the features and cost of our solutions as compared to the offerings of our competitors, our marketing effectiveness, and the success of our research and development efforts to create new and enhanced solutions. We anticipate that the HIT industry will continue to grow and be seen as a way to address growing healthcare costs while also improving the quality of healthcare.

Economic conditions have adversely affected the availability of capital for some of our clients and potential clients, with commensurate effects on their decisions about HIT spending. In addition, ~~current~~ economic conditions ~~has~~have ~~and~~motivated ~~may continue to increasingly motivate~~ some clients and potential clients to prefer software subscription contracting to traditional licensing arrangements as a means to lower the amount of the upfront investment to purchase and implement HIT solutions. Given that periodic revenues from traditional license arrangements carry higher margins and contribute significantly to overall profitability in the transaction period, this client contracting preference ~~has and~~ may ~~continue to~~ affect our profitability in the near term. In addition, the pricing environment for certain market segments is becoming increasingly difficult. Some competitors are becoming more aggressive on pricing as a way to gain or avoid losing market share. We believe this emerging market dynamic of more aggressive pricing is the result of competition to capture market share of the increasing number of hospitals with older, less robust clinical systems. ~~beginning~~Many toof ~~evaluate~~these hospitals are evaluating replacement inas ~~light~~a result of the incentives being offered through the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or (“HITECH Act”), which is part of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (“ARRA”)~~, among other factors~~.

Economic factors have contributed to a difficult operating environment, and we have responded with various initiatives to reduce and control our expenses, including headcount reductions, to better align with currently anticipated business conditions. However, the difficult economy, client financial challenges, and significant development requirements, combined with the positive effects of the HITECH Act and other factors motivating healthcare providers to expand use of information technology systems (discussed below) have resulted in an unusual business environment that makes planning and forecasting challenging.

Initiatives and Challenges for 2010

Respond to clients’ needs through ARRA certification and our “Speed-to-Value” implementation methodology

We believe helping our clients achieve ARRA “meaningful use” is critical to our future success and failure to do so in a timely manner could put us at a severe competitive disadvantage.

The HITECH Act, which is part of the ARRA, provides financial incentives for hospitals and doctors that are “meaningful users” of ~~electronic health records, or~~ EHRs, which includes use of HIT systems that are “certified” according to technical standards developed under the supervision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Qualifying hospitals and physicians can receive significant aggregate payments over a period of approximately four or five years beginning in 2011. The HITECH Act also provides for financial penalties in the form of reduced Medicare reimbursement payments for hospitals and doctors that have not become “meaningful users” of EHRs by 2015. As a result of these incentives and future penalties, we have noticed increased interest in our offerings. In order to take advantage of this opportunity and preserve our competitiveness, we are committing to clients that we will timely meet the HITECH Act certification standards. This has required us to invest in our applicable clinical software to conform to HITECH Act standards, and will require significant additional development investments as certification standards evolve.

1415

Eligible professionals and hospitals who seek to qualify for incentive payments under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs are required to use certified EHR technicians. While the details are still being finalized, we believe that failure to have certified products and to demonstrate compliance plans for products that are not certified could put us at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, we are devoting significant resources to conforming our software to current and anticipated certification criteria and believe both are critical to our future growth and success. This investment is beginning to generate favorable results. Our core product, Sunrise Clinical Manager, now preliminarily meets 22 of 22 requirements for Hospitals, and Sunrise Ambulatory Care preliminarily meets 24 of 24 requirements for Eligible Providers published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Interim Final Rule related to the ARRA. Further, in June 2010, the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (“CCHIT”) listed three integrated clinical components of Sunrise EnterpriseTM5.5 suite of products as premarket conditionally CCHIT Certified EHRs.

Some of our software is complex and highly configurable and many clients value our ability to adapt the software to their specific needs. However, this high degree of configurability can result in significant implementation costs, which can make our offering too expensive for some potential purchasers. Our ability to reach our goals for expansion into smaller clients and in the international market, and to sell to clients with budgetary constraints, depends upon our ability to develop less costly ways of implementing our complex software. To address this issue, we introduced a new “speed to value” implementation methodology and we are continuing our efforts to refine this approach and expand its use.

Deploy Community Strategy

Our community strategy is focused on helping our hospital clients better connect with affiliated physicians and other constituents in their communities. Hospitals are actively looking for solutions they can provide for physicians to establish stronger relationships through electronic sharing of patient information. To help them achieve this, we market Sunrise Ambulatory Care^TM and PeakPractice^TM solutions that our hospital clients can use to extend the inpatient Eclipsys EHR to the community for both employed and affiliated physicians.

We also have introduced Eclipsys HealthXchange™, a vendor-neutral health information exchange solution that enables access, exchange and sharing of health information among disparate systems within and across acute care, ambulatory and community settings.

Given the growing desire of our current and potential client base to enhance their electronic sharing of patient information within their “community”, we believe it is critical that we continue to improve, market, and sell these solutions in 2010. We believe our pending merger with Allscripts will significantly enhance our community strategy.

Improve Operating Margins

In the second quarter of 2009, we launched an initiative designed to more effectively align and engage our employees, implement best practice processes across all our major businesses, and improve our operating margins. To support this initiative, we engaged an outside consultant to assists us with a thorough evaluation of our business.

As a result of this project, we developed together an operational plan that targeted very specific, achievable goals with accountability for milestones and cost savings targets at both the executive management and departmental level. We established a governance structure to manage the change process and results measurement tracking and also contracted with the consultant through the second quarter of 2010 to assist in the implementation of the initiative. In the third quarter of 2009, we launched phase one of this initiative. We ~~estimate~~are beginning to see the ~~annualized~~ benefits of ~~the~~this initiative toas ~~approximate~~operating income was $1216.1 million for the first half of 2010 compared to 13 an operating loss of $2.3 million, ~~and~~for wethe ~~expect~~first half of 2009. Our operating income for the second quarter 2010 was $5.4 million compared to ~~reach~~an ~~this~~operating ~~run~~loss ~~rate~~of ~~beginning~~$2.2 million in the ~~third~~second quarter of 2009. The quarterly comparisons are more favorable when considering the second quarter 2010 was impacted by $5.4 million of incremental expense related to the release of Sunrise Enterprise 5.5. Improvements in operating margins were significantly impacted by cost savings initiatives.

Pursue International Growth

We continue efforts to expand sales of our solutions in the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East. We achieved some initial success with our sale of Sunrise Clinical Manager to SingHealth, the largest healthcare provider in Singapore. Our performance at SingHealth is being closely monitored in the region, and could prove to be a catalyst to help us drive business in new international markets. In April 2010, we expanded our Asia-Pacific footprint by contracting with a hospital in Malaysia. These international initiatives are important to our ability to grow our business and require that we oversee development and client support capabilities in a high quality and cost-effective manner. We also may face challenges building brand-name recognition and adapting our software solutions to new international markets.

Execute on Development Initiatives

In addition to requirements to help bring our clients to ARRA “meaningful use” we continue to develop other solutions to meet our client’s needs. We continue to emphasize development and marketing of our performance management suite of solutions, consisting of Sunrise EPSi™, Sunrise Patient Flow™ and Sunrise Clinical Analytics™. These solutions help healthcare organizations streamline and automate manual processes required to gather, analyze and display enterprise-wide information. They also enable hospital senior and department level management to more easily identify areas requiring intervention and to improve clinical quality, regulatory compliance, cost-efficiency, resource utilization and patient satisfaction. We think an integrated performance management offering can be a competitive differentiator for us, but it requires additional investment to develop these independent applications into an integrated solution.

15Another important research and development initiative includes continued work on making our Sunrise EnterpriseTM platform more extensible to better interoperate with solutions from third party vendors. Sunrise Enterprise 5.5, which was made generally available in April 2010, is an important step towards providing this capability. During the second quarter 2010 we successfully implemented Sunrise Enterprise 5.5 at two major client sites in a 60 day period. Our goal is to make future versions of our platform even more extensible.

~~Table~~During the first quarter of ~~Contents~~2010, we introduced Helios by EclipsysTM, which is our unique open platform strategy to deliver vendor choice and flexibility. We plan to use our open platform to enable and encourage third parties to write applications that work with our software. We are enabling clients and certified third-parties to natively integrate their applications with our enterprise solutions so our clients can utilize best-of-breed systems without the additional cost and complexity of customized interfaces to a closed proprietary architecture. This approach is expected to result in improved clinician workflows, an enhanced organizational ability to embrace and extend current technology investments and more freedom to adopt the latest technology innovations by removing the constraints caused by waiting for a single vendor’s development timeline. We view having an open platform as an important competitive differentiator and our continued development of this platform is an important part of our plans for future success.

~~Another~~In ~~important~~the ~~research~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~development~~of ~~initiative~~2010, ~~includes~~we ~~continued~~also ~~work~~introduced ~~on making~~ our ~~Sunrise EnterpriseTM~~integrated ~~platform~~suite of mobility applications designed for the Apple iPhone® ~~more~~and ~~extensible~~Apple iPod touch®. Specific to ~~better~~physicians, ~~interoperate~~Eclipsys ~~with~~Apple ~~solutions~~iPhone ~~from~~application ~~third~~enables ~~party~~rapid ~~vendors.~~access ~~Sunrise~~to ~~Enterprise~~patient ~~5.5~~information and order entry capabilities, ~~which~~going ~~was~~one ~~made~~step ~~generally~~beyond ~~available~~typical inmobile ~~April~~devices ~~2010,~~which ismerely anprovide ~~important~~physicians ~~step~~with ~~towards~~views ~~providing~~of ~~this~~patient ~~capability~~data. ~~Our~~For ~~goal~~nurses, isgraphical totask ~~make~~lists ~~future~~and ~~versions~~patient ofmanagement features support improved workflows and enhanced ability ~~our~~to ~~platform~~respond ~~even~~to ~~more~~patient ~~extensible~~needs.

~~During~~Another ~~the~~major ~~first~~initiative ~~quarter~~is the migration of ~~2010,~~our wepatient ~~introduced~~accounting ~~Helios~~solutions, bySunrise ~~EclipsysTM~~Patient FinancialsTM, ~~which~~to isthe ~~our~~same HeliosTM ~~unique open~~ platform ~~strategy~~as toSunrise Clinical ~~deliver~~ManagerTM ~~vendor choice~~ and ~~flexibility.~~other WeSunrise EnterpriseTM ~~plan~~solutions, tosuch ~~use~~as ~~our~~Sunrise ~~open~~Enterprise RegistrationTM ~~platform to enable~~ and ~~encourage~~Sunrise ~~third~~Enterprise SchedulingTM. ~~parties~~Once toSunrise ~~write~~Patient ~~applications~~Financials ~~that~~is ~~work~~on ~~with~~the same ~~our~~platform ~~software.~~we Wecan ~~are~~bring ~~enabling~~to ~~clients~~market ~~and~~a ~~certified~~completely ~~third-parties~~integrated toclinical ~~natively~~and ~~integrate~~revenue ~~their applications~~cycle ~~with~~management ~~our~~solution, ~~enterprise~~which ~~solutions~~some sopotential ~~our~~ clients ~~can~~view ~~utilize~~as ~~best-of-breed~~an ~~systems~~important ~~without~~factor ~~the~~in ~~additional~~their ~~cost~~selection ~~and complexity~~ of ~~customized~~an ~~interfaces~~enterprise ~~to a closed proprietary architecture~~vendor. This ~~approach~~solution is expected to ~~result in improved~~be ~~clinician~~generally ~~workflows,~~available anin ~~enhanced organizational ability to embrace and extend current technology investments and more freedom to adopt~~ the ~~latest~~second ~~technology~~half ~~innovations~~of ~~by removing the constraints caused by waiting for a single vendor's development timeline~~2011. WeWith ~~view~~so ~~having~~many anhospitals ~~open~~running ~~platform~~on asextremely anantiquated ~~important~~patient ~~competitive~~accounting ~~differentiator~~systems, ~~and~~we ~~our~~anticipate ~~continued~~a ~~development~~growing ofdemand ~~this platform is an important part of our plans~~ for ~~future~~more ~~success~~modern solutions.

In the first quarter of 2010, we also introduced our integrated suite of mobility applications designed for the Apple iPhone and Apple iPod touch. Specific to physicians, Eclipsys’ Apple iPhone application enables rapid access to patient information and order entry capabilities, going one step beyond typical mobile devices which merely provide physicians with views of patient data. For nurses, graphical task lists and patient management features support improved workflows and enhanced ability to respond to patient needs.

Another major initiative is the migration of our patient accounting solutions, Sunrise Patient FinancialsTM, to the same XATM platform as Sunrise Clinical ManagerTM and other Sunrise EnterpriseTM solutions, such as Sunrise Enterprise RegistrationTM and Sunrise Enterprise SchedulingTM. Once Sunrise Patient Financials is on the same platform we can bring to market a completely integrated clinical and revenue cycle management solution, which some potential clients view as an important factor in their selection of an enterprise vendor. This solution is expected to be generally available in the second half of 2011. With so many hospitals running on extremely antiquated patient accounting systems, we anticipate a growing demand for more modern solutions.

Recent Performance and Outlook

Our ~~first~~second quarter 2010 performance reflects our initiatives to control costs and drive improvements in our operating margins. Total revenues of $~~128~~134.4 million in the ~~first~~second quarter 2010 were 13.45% ~~lower~~higher than the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009,. ~~despite~~The ~~an increase~~overall increase in ~~ratable~~revenue ~~revenues~~reflected ~~from~~increased ~~software,~~demand ~~maintenance,~~and ~~outsourcing~~improved ~~and~~mix ~~remote~~of ~~hosting~~periodic software license revenues. The ~~overall~~increase ~~decline~~was instunted ~~revenue~~by ~~reflected~~ continued softness in our professional services business,. ~~resulting~~This situation resulted from fewer large enterprise activations ~~impacted by lower enterprise sales~~ in 2009, reflecting economic pressures on our clients, and ~~some~~ delays in capital investments pending further definition of ARRA requirements. ~~The~~For ~~HITECH~~the ~~Act~~six ~~appears~~months toended beJune ~~starting~~30, to2010, ~~drive~~new ~~increased~~business ~~demand~~bookings ~~for~~were ~~enterprise solutions~~$259.4 million, which were Wepositively ~~expect~~impacted ~~bookings~~by ~~activity~~new ~~from~~and ~~ARRA~~existing tocustomers ~~continue~~making toinvestment ~~build~~decisions ~~through~~to meet the ~~rest~~meaningful use criteria of ~~2010~~the ~~and~~ARRA. ~~beyond,~~We asdefine ~~clients~~new ~~and~~business ~~prospects~~bookings ~~start~~as ~~accelerating~~the ~~purchasing~~total ~~decisions~~amount ~~required~~of toall ~~achieve~~new ~~‘meaningful~~contracts ~~use’~~signed, ~~requirements~~excluding renewal contracts. Our professional services business ~~should~~may ~~improve~~not inreflect ~~the~~comparable ~~latter~~growth ~~half~~as ofwe ~~2010~~experience ~~compared~~continued tolag ~~recent~~between ~~activity~~sales ~~due to recent positive~~ bookings ~~activity~~ and ~~expectations~~implementation ~~for continued improvements in 2010~~activity.

The overall revenue ~~decline~~increase in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010 compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009 included aan ~~reduction~~increase of $42.79 million, or 3742.85%, in ~~periodic~~ periodic revenues to $79.8 million. Periodic revenues can fluctuate dramatically depending on whether we are able to record license revenues at contract signing, which is dependent on each individual client’s contract terms. Therefore, it is difficult to project periodic license revenues in future quarters, and declines in periodic license revenues can have a significant adverse effect on our earnings for the period.

~~Although~~Our ~~overall revenues declined, our earnings improved due to our~~ cost reduction efforts, ~~which~~implemented during 2009 contributed to aan 9overall 2.73% reduction in total expenses for the second quarter 2010 and a 6.0% reduction for the first ~~quarter~~six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the ~~first~~same ~~quarter~~periods in 2009. The ~~first~~second quarter of2010 ~~2009~~expenses included $53.4 million of ~~restructuring~~merger ~~charges.~~related ~~Expense~~expenses, ~~reductions~~while ~~reflect~~the ~~ongoing~~first ~~initiatives~~six ~~implemented~~months ~~during~~of 2009 included $5.4 million of restructuring charges.

Pre-tax income for the first quarter of 2010 was $10.6 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2009. Results by quarter can vary due to many factors including the effects on demand created by factors like the HITECH Act and other emerging changes in the market and regulatory environment for our clients; increasing price competition in certain market segments, as certain competitors attempt to retain market share; timing of license revenues; restructuring activity; and capitalized software labor deferrals, which also can fluctuate based on project activity.

Operating cash flows of $15.9 million for the first three months in 2010 decreased $3.8 million compared to operating cash flows of $19.7 million in the first three months of 2009 due to $12.5 million in incentive compensation payments made during 2010 under the 2009 incentive plan, offsetting strong income generated by operations. We did not pay bonuses in 2009 under the 2008 incentive plan. We utilized these operating cash flows and $4.6 million of proceeds from ARS sales and redemptions to repay $14.0 million of long-term debt during the first quarter of 2010. We also paid the remaining $15.0 million of outstanding long-term debt under our secured credit facility in April 2010.

Pre-tax income for the second quarter of 2010 was $3.9 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2009. Results by quarter can vary due to many factors including the effects on demand created by factors like the HITECH Act and other emerging changes in the market and regulatory environment for our clients; increasing price competition in certain market segments, as certain competitors attempt to retain market share; timing of license revenues; restructuring activity; and capitalized software labor deferrals, which also can fluctuate based on project activity.

Operating cash flows of $37.6 million for the first six months in 2010 decreased $0.2 million compared to operating cash flows of $37.8 million in the first six months of 2009 due to $12.5 million in incentive compensation payments made during 2010 under the 2009 incentive plan, offsetting higher income generated by operations. We did not pay bonuses in 2009 under the 2008 incentive plan. We utilized these operating cash flows and $32.5 million of proceeds from ARS sales and redemptions to repay $29.0 million of long-term debt during the first six months of 2010.

Pending Merger with Allscripts

On June 9, 2010, we announced that we had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc., a leading provider of clinical software, services, information and connectivity solutions that empower physicians and other healthcare providers to deliver best-in-class patient safety, clinical outcomes and financial results (“Allscripts”), and Arsenal Merger Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Allscripts (“Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Eclipsys, with Eclipsys surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Allscripts (the “Merger”).

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been approved and adopted by boards of directors of both Allscripts and Eclipsys, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of Eclipsys common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than those shares owned by us, Allscripts or any of their respective subsidiaries, will be converted into the right to receive 1.2 shares of Allscripts common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

Completion of the Merger is subject to certain conditions, including (i) adoption of the Merger Agreement by our stockholders, and (ii) approval by Allscripts’ stockholders of the issuance of Allscripts common stock in connection with the Merger. In addition, the transaction is subject to the completion of a secondary offering of Allscripts shares owned by Misys and the completion of the Allscripts buyback from Misys of additional Allscripts shares owned by Misys, each as described below, which will substantially reduce Misys’s share ownership of Allscripts prior to the closing of the Merger. There is no assurance the Merger will close.

We believe the combination of Allscripts and Eclipsys will allow the combined company to become a larger, more competitive “end-to-end” solutions provider within the healthcare information technology industry. Combining the companies’ respective solution sets will result in one of the most comprehensive solution offerings for healthcare organizations of every size and setting. By combining physician-office and post-acute care solutions from Allscripts with Eclipsys’ enterprise solutions for hospitals and health systems, the combined company will offer a single platform of clinical, financial, connectivity and information solutions.

After the Merger, given the unique breadth of solutions and customer types, the combined company expects to be uniquely positioned to connect physicians, other care providers and patients across all health care provider settings including hospitals, small or large physician practices, extended care facilities, or in a home care setting. The Merger establishes significant breadth and critical mass to compete for opportunities among large hospital and health systems that increasingly are looking to one information technology vendor to provide a single, end-to-end solution across all points of care.

Reduction of Misys’ Share Ownership in Allscripts

On June 9, 2010, Allscripts also announced that it had entered into a Framework Agreement with Misys, which was subsequently amended on July 26, 2010 (as amended, the “Framework Agreement”). Pursuant to the Framework Agreement, Allscripts and Misys agreed to reduce Misys’ existing indirect ownership interest in Allscripts. As of June 8, 2010, Misys held indirectly 79.8 million shares of Allscripts’ common stock, representing approximately 54.5% of the aggregate voting power of Allscripts’ capital stock. Upon completion of the Coniston Transactions described below, and assuming that Misys sells 25 million shares of Allscripts common stock in the Secondary Offering and exercises its right to sell shares in the Contingent Share Repurchase, each as described below, it is expected that Misys’ equity stake in Allscripts will be approximately 13.5%.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Framework Agreement, Misys and Allscripts have agreed that:

•

100% of the issued and outstanding shares of an indirect subsidiary of Misys (“Newco”), which will hold 61.3 million shares of Allscripts’ common stock, will be transferred to Allscripts in exchange for 61.3 million newly issued shares of Allscripts’ common stock (such shares being referred to as the “Exchange Shares” and the transaction described in this bullet being referred to as the “Exchange”);

•

Misys, directly or through one or more of its subsidiaries, will sell additional shares of Allscripts’ common stock in an underwritten secondary public offering (the “Secondary Offering”);

•

Allscripts will repurchase from Misys or from one or more of its indirect subsidiaries 24.4 million Exchange Shares at an aggregate purchase price of $577.4 million (the “Share Repurchase”), which includes a payment of a premium of $117.4 million in connection with the sale by Misys of its controlling interest in Allscripts; and

•

if the Merger is completed, Misys will have the right to require that Allscripts repurchase from Misys or from one or more of its indirect subsidiaries approximately 5.3 million additional shares of Allscripts common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $101.6 million (the “Contingent Share Repurchase”), which right may be exercised for up to 10 days after the closing of the Merger.

The Exchange, Share Repurchase and Secondary Offering are referred to as the “Coniston Transactions.”

The closing of the Coniston Transactions is subject to certain conditions, including (i) approval of the Coniston Transactions by the shareholders of Misys, (ii) the sale of no fewer than 36 million shares of Allscripts common stock owned by Misys in the Secondary Offering, or 25 million shares if Allscripts’ stockholders approve the issuance of Allscripts common stock in connection with the Merger and Eclipsys stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement, at a public offering price of no less than $16.50 per share, (iii) completion of the Share Repurchase and (iv) completion of the financing contemplated by the Commitment Letter described below and completion of the Share Repurchase using proceeds of the credit facility.

In connection with the Coniston Transactions, Allscripts has signed a commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, UBS Loan Finance LLC and certain of their affiliates for a $570 million senior secured term loan facility and a $150 million senior secured revolving facility, each of which is expected to close upon the closing of the Coniston Transactions. Allscripts expects to use the proceeds from these facilities, as well as cash on hand, to finance the Share Repurchase and the Contingent Share Repurchase, to pay certain fees and expenses in connection with the Merger and the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement, and to finance the working capital needs and general corporate purposes of Allscripts and its subsidiaries.

More Information; Risks

The Merger and the Coniston Transactions are described in detail in the joint proxy statement/prospectus/information statement on Form S-4 filed by Allscripts and Eclipsys with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2010 and made available to stockholders of Allscripts and Eclipsys in connection with the Merger.

As a result of the Merger Agreement, the current market value of Eclipsys shares is a function of the market value of Allscripts shares based upon the merger exchange ratio, so developments with respect to Allscripts that negatively affect the market value of Allscripts shares can be expected to have a negative effect on the value of Eclipsys shares, and positive developments for Eclipsys might not have the same positive effect on the market value of Eclipsys shares as if the Merger had not been announced.

The Merger is subject to conditions including adoption of the Merger Agreement by our stockholders, approval by Allscripts’ stockholders of the issuance of Allscripts common stock in connection with the Merger, and completion of the Coniston transactions. There is no assurance that the Merger will close.

Our work on the Merger has resulted in substantial costs that we must pay whether or not the Merger closes. Through June 30, 2010, we have incurred $3.4 million of expenses for legal, banking, accounting, and consulting services related to the Merger, and additional costs have been incurred since June 30 and will continue to be incurred until the Merger closes or the Merger Agreement terminates.

Failure to complete the Merger might result in various adverse effects including damage to our reputation and a decrease in the value of our shares.

If the Merger closes, then Eclipsys stockholders will become Allscripts stockholders and be subject not only to risks of the type currently affecting Eclipsys’ business, but also risks related to Allscripts’ business, which are similar to risks affecting Eclipsys’ business but some of which are more particular to Allscripts.

See “Risk Factors” below for more detail.

Reasons for the Merger

Strategic Considerations and Addressing Challenges and Opportunities in the Market:

Our board of directors believes that market factors have caused clients to accelerate health information technology purchasing decisions that will help shape the market landscape for years to come. These factors include increased competitiveness among hospitals, closer affiliations between hospitals and referring physicians, evolving healthcare industry dynamics such as payor reimbursement rates and requirements, regulatory and certification mandates, federal funding provided by HITECH passed as part of the ARRA, technological advances and the increasing use and capabilities of health information technology, and the anticipated relaxation of The Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (Stark Law). These factors have driven a growing convergence of the acute and ambulatory markets, which have historically been largely distinct but are now quickly consolidating. This consolidation has caused Eclipsys’ current and prospective clients to focus on seeking broad, functionally integrated single-platform solutions that include market-leading acute care and ambulatory elements.

In addition, various factors including increased market competition among health information technology providers, accelerating technological evolution, greater utilization of health information technology and demands for integration across a growing healthcare spectrum, more challenging regulatory requirements, economic conditions, and investor expectations have combined to result in a more complex and challenging business environment that the Eclipsys board believes can better be managed with greater financial and operational scale.

In evaluating how to adapt to these market factors, the Eclipsys board of directors has considered possible alternatives available to Eclipsys, including the acquisition of one or more companies to pursue various objectives and the increased scale and acceleration of development of Eclipsys’ integrated acute and ambulatory offering, as well as various other internal development initiatives to address market developments including the convergence of the acute and ambulatory markets, investments from outside sources, and combinations with companies looking to enter the health information technology market. The board believes that the merger will confer various strategic, operational and financial benefits that will likely enable the combined company to address challenges and capitalize upon opportunities more quickly and effectively than Eclipsys alone, and will result in better long-term value prospects for Eclipsys stockholders than other available alternative strategic courses of action. In reaching this conclusion, the Eclipsys board of directors formed the following views:

Scale and Scope. The merger could quickly result in a combined company with significantly greater diversification, scale and scope in the industry than Eclipsys alone, which will enable Eclipsys to increase its addressable market faster than by continuing to build its own capabilities. The combined company will have the ability to integrate the market-leading technologies of Eclipsys and Allscripts and offer its customers an integrated acute/ambulatory/post-acute electronic health record solution and a broader set of leading capabilities with a total customer base of approximately 1,500 hospitals, 180,000 physician users and 10,000 post-acute providers.

Meeting Market Demands. The merger provides the combined company with the ability to join the Allscripts and Eclipsys market-leading acute and ambulatory offerings into a functionally integrated solution that should be compelling to the market. Eclipsys will be able to make this functionally integrated solution available in the market more quickly and efficiently, with more predictable results and at lower costs to clients through the merger than could be accomplished through other available alternative strategic courses of action. Both companies utilize the Microsoft .Net platform (a more modern and flexible platform than alternatives), have experience integrating their respective solutions at various clients already, and share common development and architectural approaches and philosophies. In addition, the market perceives Eclipsys as strong in the acute arena and Allscripts as strong in the ambulatory arena, which will enable the combined company to take advantage of those market perceptions, rather than trying to remake them to suit alternative strategies. Eclipsys’ plan to meet market demand through the enhancement and marketing of its own ambulatory capabilities is likely to face obstacles such as the costs and challenges of introducing new solutions, the time associated with new development relative to the immediacy of customer purchasing decisions, and market perceptions, and these obstacles can be avoided by combining with Allscripts to take advantage of its expertise, capabilities, reputation and platform in the ambulatory market. For all of these reasons, the merger should give the combined company, with its market leading integrated acute care and ambulatory functionality, the best opportunity to take advantage of current market dynamics to increase market share and position the business favorably for the next several years.

Cost and Revenue Synergies. The combined company will be able to achieve cost synergies through elimination of redundant expenses and leveraging common resources, so as to increase efficiency and operating margins. In addition, the combined company will have increased revenue opportunities from cross selling into each company’s existing customer base along with potential sales to new customers interested in a full service, integrated suite of products.

Impact of the Merger on Customers and Employees. The merger will benefit customers by enhancing operations, strengthening reliability and extending connectivity across the continuum of care. The merger will also provide more opportunities for employees in a larger, more competitive company, which will help with recruiting and retention in an increasingly competitive environment.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The combined company will be better positioned to help clients leverage more effectively the federal funding for hospital and physician adoption of Electronic Health Records that is provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Management Arrangements. The combined company will have a rich base of talented and experienced employees in key positions and will be able to draw upon the combined experience of two strong senior management teams, Allscripts current Chief Executive Officer, Glen Tullman, will continue as Chief Executive Officer of the combined company, and our current Chief Executive Officer, Phil Pead will serve as the Chairman of the board of directors of the combined company, Messrs. Fife and Kangas, who currently serve as members of our board of directors, will serve on the board of directors of the combined company, and certain members of our senior management team will serve as members of the combined company’s executive team. This continuity of our management will help the combined company with integration and client retention and service, and will facilitate achievement of the anticipated benefits of the merger.

Retained Equity Interest. The fact that the merger consideration consists of Allscripts common stock will permit the Eclipsys stockholders to retain an equity interest in the combined company with the opportunity to share in its future growth.

Stock Trading Considerations. The increased size and market capitalization of the combined company should provide greater stockholder liquidity, make the combined company an attractive investment for a broader range of potential investors, and improve analyst coverage, all of which should help increase stockholder value.

Financial Considerations. The combined company will have a solid financial profile, with greater revenue and cash flow generating capabilities and a stronger capital structure, making the combined company better able to take advantage of strategic opportunities.

Innovation. Innovation is a driver of competitive differentiation in the evolving health information technology market. The advantages of the combined company, including increased scale, access to each company’s technology, development resources, and client support, and meaningful participation at each point in the health information technology spectrum, will all contribute to the combined company’s innovative capabilities and ability to influence the market and accelerate the pace of adoption for electronic-prescribing, electronic health records and other health information technology solutions.

Consolidated Results of Operations (unaudited)

Key financial and operating data for Eclipsys Corporation and its subsidiaries are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	For The Three MonthsEnded March 31,						Change($)			Change(%)
	For The Three MonthsEnded June 30,						Change			Change		For The Six MonthsEnded June 30,						Change			Change
	2010			2009			($)			(%)		2010			2009			($)			(%)
Revenues:
Systems and services	$	~~125~~131,~~557~~480		$	~~128~~127,~~137~~675		$	(23,~~580~~805	)	-23.0	%	$	257,037		$	255,812		$	1,225		0.5	%
Hardware		2,~~803~~962			2,~~029~~173			~~774~~789		3836.13	%		5,765			4,202			1,563		37.2	%
Total revenues		~~128~~134,~~360~~442			~~130~~129,~~166~~848			(14,~~806~~594	)	-13.45	%		262,802			260,014			2,788		1.1	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of systems and services (excluding depreciation and amortization shown below)		6571,~~199~~208			6668,~~874~~315			(12,~~675~~893	)	-24.52	%		136,407			135,189			1,218		0.9	%
Cost of hardware		2,~~452~~412			1,~~656~~950			~~796~~462		4823.17	%		4,864			3,606			1,258		34.9	%
Sales and marketing		1917,~~748~~293			2227,~~751~~394			(310,~~003~~101	)	-1336.29	%		37,041			50,144			(13,103	)	-26.1	%
Research and development		1317,~~461~~229			13,~~493~~872			~~(32~~3,357	)	-024.2	%		30,690			27,364			3,326		12.2	%
General and administrative		812,~~567~~321			12,~~021~~429			(~~3,454~~108	)	-280.79	%		20,888			24,451			(3,563	)	-14.6	%
Restructuring		—			~~5,434~~—			~~(5,434~~—	)	~~-100.0~~*	%		—			5,434			(5,434	)	-100.0	%
Depreciation and amortization		8,~~226~~564			8,~~034~~117			~~192~~447		25.45	%		16,790			16,152			638		3.9	%
Total costs and expenses		~~117~~129,~~653~~027			~~130~~132,~~263~~077			(123,~~610~~050	)	-92.73	%		246,680			262,340			(15,660	)	-6.0	%
Income (loss) from operations		105,~~707~~415			(972,229	)		107,~~804~~644		*			16,122			(2,326	)		18,448		*
Gain on sale of assets		—			~~400~~838			(~~400~~838	)	-100.0	%		—			1,237			(1,237	)	-100.0	%
Loss on investments, net		(~~226~~1,573	)		~~(158~~691	)		(682,264	)	43-327.06	%		(1,799	)		533			(2,332	)	-437.5	%
Interest income		~~417~~372			~~847~~681			(~~430~~309	)	-5045.84	%		789			1,528			(739	)	-48.4	%
Interest expense		(~~344~~267	)		(~~1,143~~961	)		~~799~~694		-6972.92	%		(611	)		(2,105	)		1,494		-71.0	%
Income (loss) before taxes		103,~~554~~947			(~~151~~980	)		104,~~705~~927		*			14,501			(1,133	)		15,634		*
Provision for income taxes		52,~~128~~310			~~714~~3,120			~~4,414~~(810	)	*-26.0	%		7,438			3,834			3,604		94.0	%
Net income (loss)	$	51,~~426~~637		$	(~~865~~4,100	)	$	65,~~291~~737		~~-727.3~~*	%	$	7,063		$	(4,967	)	$	12,030		*
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.0903		$	(0.0207	)	$	0.1110				$	0.12		$	(0.09	)	$	0.21
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.0903		$	(0.0207	)	$	0.1110				$	0.12		$	(0.09	)	$	0.21

*	Not meaningful

Revenues

Total revenues ~~decreased~~increased by $14.86 million, or 13.45%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, revenues increased by $2.8 million, or 1.1% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Systems and Services Revenues

Systems and services revenues consisted of the following (in thousands):

	For the Three MonthsEnded March 31,				Change($)			Change(%)
	For the Three MonthsEnded June 30 ,				Change			Change		For the Six MonthsEnded June 30,				Change			Change
	2010		2009		($)			(%)		2010		2009		($)			(%)
Revenues recognized ratably	$	9496,~~309~~682	$	8889,~~101~~909	$	6,~~208~~773		7.05	%	$	190,991	$	178,010	$	12,981		7.3	%
Professional services		2225,~~747~~022		2730,~~346~~908		(45,~~599~~886	)	-1619.80	%		47,769		58,254		(10,485	)	-18.0	%
Periodic revenues:
Eclipsys software related fees		78,~~330~~242		105,~~216~~784		(2,~~886~~458	)	~~-28~~42.25	%		15,572		16,000		(428	)	-2.7	%
Third party software related fees		1,~~171~~534		21,~~474~~074		~~(1,303~~460	)	~~-52~~42.78	%		2,705		3,548		(843	)	-23.8	%
Total periodic revenues		89,~~501~~776		126,~~690~~858		(42,~~189~~918	)	~~-33~~42.05	%		18,277		19,548		(1,271	)	-6.5	%
Total systems and services revenues	$	~~125~~131,~~557~~480	$	~~128~~127,~~137~~675	$	(23,~~580~~805	)	-23.0	%	$	257,037	$	255,812	$	1,225		0.5	%

Revenues Recognized Ratably— - Revenues recognized ratably from software, maintenance, outsourcing and ~~remote~~ remote hosting were $9496.37 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, a 7.05 % increase from the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. The increase was due to previous period sales of our software solutions, remote hosting related services, and outsourcing, resulting in growth in our recurring revenue base. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, revenues recognized ratably increased $13.0 million, or 7.3%, compared to the six month ended June 30, 2009.

1822

Professional Services Revenues - Professional services revenues, which include implementation, training and consulting related services, were $2225.70 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, a decrease of $45.69 million, or 1619.80%, from the ~~first~~second quarter 2009. The decrease primarily resulted from a reduction in professional service hours worked on large enterprise deals, due to lower enterprise deal sales in 2009. Professional services also decreased due to lower client spending on training. ~~Recent~~For ~~improvement in~~ the ~~economy~~six ~~should~~months ~~result~~ended inJune 30, ~~increased~~2010, ~~enterprise~~professional ~~sales~~services ~~and~~revenues decreased ~~training~~$10.5 ~~activity~~million, or 18.0%, compared to the six month ended June 30, 2009. Prior year percentage of completion revenues of $0.27 million ~~have~~for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 have been reclassified from professional services revenues to periodic revenues to conform to current year presentation.

Periodic Revenues - Periodic revenues, which consist of Eclipsys software -related fees and third party software related fees, were $89.58 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010., ~~The~~an ~~decline~~increase ~~from the first quarter~~ of ~~2009 is due to recent client preferences for subscription-type transactions that spread their license payments over time~~$2.9 ~~In any period~~million, ~~some~~or ~~software~~42.5% ~~revenues~~compared ~~can be~~to ~~considered~~the ~~one-time~~corresponding period in ~~nature~~2009. ~~for~~Periodic ~~that period, and we do not recognize these periodic~~ revenues onwere ~~a ratable basis~~$18.3 ~~These~~million ~~periodic~~for ~~revenues~~the ~~include~~six ~~traditional~~months ~~license~~ended ~~fees~~June 30, ~~associated with new contracts signed in the period~~2010, ~~including~~down ~~add-on licenses~~$1.3 ~~to existing clients and new client transactions~~million, ~~as well as revenues from contract backlog that had not previously been recognized pending contract performance that occurred~~ or ~~was~~6.5% ~~completed~~compared ~~during~~to the ~~period,~~corresponding ~~and certain other activities during the~~ period ~~associated~~in ~~with client relationships~~2009. InAs ~~the~~previously ~~aggregate~~discussed, ~~these~~ periodic revenues can ~~contribute~~fluctuate ~~significantly~~dramatically todepending ~~earnings~~on whether inwe ~~the period because relatively little in-period costs~~ are ~~associated~~able ~~with~~to ~~such~~record license revenues. Weat ~~expect~~contract ~~these periodic revenues~~signing, which ~~depend~~is dependent on ~~economic~~each ~~conditions,~~individual client’s ~~preferences~~contract ~~and~~terms. ~~other factors~~Therefore, toit ~~continue~~is difficult to ~~fluctuate~~project asperiodic alicense ~~result~~revenues ~~of significant variations~~ in ~~the~~future ~~type~~quarters, and ~~magnitude~~declines ~~of sales and other contract and client activity~~ in ~~any period, and these variations make it difficult to predict the nature and amount of these~~ periodic ~~revenues. Prior year content software~~ license revenues ofcan ~~$1.0 million~~ have ~~been~~a ~~reclassified~~significant ~~from~~adverse ~~Eclipsys~~effect ~~software~~on ~~related~~our ~~fees~~earnings tofor ~~third~~the ~~party software related fees to conform to current year presentation~~period.

In any period, some software revenues can be considered one-time in nature for that period, and we do not recognize these periodic revenues on a ratable basis. These periodic revenues include traditional license fees associated with new contracts signed in the period, including add-on licenses to existing clients and new client transactions, as well as revenues from contract backlog that had not previously been recognized pending contract performance that occurred or was completed during the period, and certain other activities during the period associated with client relationships. In the aggregate, these periodic revenues can contribute significantly to earnings in the period because relatively little in-period costs are associated with such revenues. Prior year content software license revenues of $1.1 million have been reclassified from Eclipsys software related fees to third party software related fees to conform to current year presentation.

Hardware Revenues

Hardware revenues increased by $0.8 million, or 3836.13%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, as compared to the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2009. The increase in hardware revenues is primarily attributable to lower volumes in 2009 due to fewer enterprise deals sold in late 2008 and early 2009 and due to increased demand in 2010 reflecting increased client upgrade activity. Hardware revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $5.8 million, which represents a 37.2% increase over the same period in 2009.

Operating Expenses

Cost of Systems and Services

Our cost of systems and services ~~decreased~~increased $12.79 million, or 24.52%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. The ~~decrease~~increase reflects a $0.59 million ~~decrease~~increase in labor related costs, ~~and a $0.6~~which ~~million decrease in travel related costs. The labor decrease of $0.5 million~~ includes a $1.13 million ~~decrease~~increase in core wages ~~reflecting professional services headcount reductions during 2009~~ partially offset by ~~higher~~lower ~~self-insured~~annual ~~medical~~incentive ~~costs caused~~compensation byof ~~unusual~~$0.4 ~~high~~million. ~~dollar~~The ~~claim~~increase ~~activity~~ in ~~the~~cost ~~first~~of ~~quarter~~systems ofand ~~2010.~~services ~~The~~also ~~travel~~includes ~~related~~an ~~reductions~~increase ~~reflect~~in ~~cost~~amortization ~~savings~~of ~~initiatives~~capitalized ~~implemented~~software ~~during~~of ~~2009~~$2.4 ~~and~~million related to athe ~~lesser~~release ~~extent~~of ~~lower~~Sunrise ~~professional~~XA ~~services~~5.5 ~~activity~~ in ~~the~~April ~~first quarter~~ 2010 ~~compared to the first quarter 2009~~.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, cost of systems and services increased $1.2 million, a 0.9% increase over the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflecting higher labor costs of $0.4 million and an increase in the amortization of capitalized software of $2.5 million for reasons described above. These increases were partially offset by lower legal fees of $1.0 million and lower professional services of $0.7 million. During 2009, certain legal fees supporting patent infringement litigation were coded to cost of systems and services.

Cost of Hardware

Cost of hardware increased $0.85 million, or 4823.17%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. This increase was directly attributable to increased hardware revenues in the quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, cost of hardware increased $1.3 million, a 34.9% increase over the six months ended June 30, 2009. Hardware revenues are recorded when the hardware is delivered. The amount of hardware revenues in any quarter depends on shipments associated with active implementations.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing expenses decreased $310.01 million, or 1336.29%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. This decrease included $37.46 million of lower labor related costs primarily impacted by lower wages of $24.10 million, lower annual incentive compensation of $0.79 million and lower stock compensation of $02.67 million. Stock based compensation expense was higher in the second quarter 2009 due primarily to the resignation of our former Chief Executive Officer. The reduction in wages reflects headcount reductions late in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009 and in the fourth quarter of 2009 including unfilled fourth quarter 2009 vacancies. We expect labor savings excluding stock based compensation expense to continue for the remainder of 2010, but to a lesser extent as certain headcount vacancies are filled. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses also included lower meeting costs of $0.8 million, lower trade show expenses of $0.7 million impacted by the timing of major client events, and lower professional services of $0.5 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, sales and marketing expenses decreased $13.1 million, a 26.1% decrease over the six months ended June 30, 2009 impacted by lower labor related costs of $11.1 million, which included lower wages of $6.1 million, lower stock based compensation expense of $3.3 million and lower annual incentive compensation of $1.7 million due to reasons similar to the decrease for the second quarter described above. Lower travel expenses of $0.8 million due to lower headcount and cost savings initiatives and lower professional services of $0.5 million also contributed to the decrease for the six month period.

Research and Development

Our research and development expenses ~~were~~increased ~~flat~~$3.4 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. ~~Offsetting changes~~This ~~included~~increase ais ~~reduction~~primarily ~~in research and development expenses of $0.9 million as~~ a result of andecreased ~~increase in~~ internal labor cost capitalization of $3.1 million associated with Sunrise XA 5.5, which was released in April 2010. As a product is being developed, ~~and~~internal ~~higher~~labor ~~consulting~~is ~~related~~capitalized, ~~project~~which reduces research and development expenses. ofFor $0the Sunrise XA 5.5, ~~million.~~capitalized ~~Capitalized~~ hours increased ~~throughout~~during 2009 and the ~~Sunrise~~first XAquarter ~~5.5~~of 2010 as the development ~~and~~was ~~accelerated~~underway ~~prior~~with toa large increase near the final stages of development. After the April 2010 release date, these capitalized hours decreased resulting in the decrease in internal labor cost capitalization in the second quarter of 2010. Research and development labor was generally flat in 2010 compared to 2009 as ~~we stabilized~~ headcount growth in India ~~during~~has ~~2009~~now stabilized.

19For the six months ended June 30, 2010, research and development expenses increased $3.3 million, or 12.2%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to lower internal labor capitalization costs of $2.2 million due to the previously discussed release of Sunrise XA 5.5. The six month period also includes higher consulting expenses for research projects.

Our gross research and development spending, which consists of research and development expenses and capitalized software development costs, was as follows (in thousands):

	For The Three Months EndedMarch 31,				Change($)			Change(%)
	For The Three MonthsEnded June 30,				Change			Change		For The Six MonthsEnded June 30,				Change			Change
	2010		2009		($)			(%)		2010		2009		($)			(%)
Research and development expenses	$	1317,~~461~~229	$	13,~~493~~872	$	~~(32~~3,357	)	-024.2	%	$	30,690	$	27,364	$	3,326		12.2	%
Capitalized software and development costs		84,~~091~~365		7,~~216~~435		~~875~~(3,070	)	12-41.13	%		12,456		14,651		(2,195	)	-15.0	%
Gross research and development expenditures	$	21,~~552~~594	$	2021,~~709~~307	$	~~843~~287		4.1.3	%	$	43,146	$	42,015	$	1,131		2.7	%
Amortization of capitalized software development costs	$	36,~~857~~207	$	3,~~752~~847	$	~~105~~2,360		261.83	%	$	10,063	$	7,598	$	2,465		32.4	%

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expenses decreased $30.51 million, or 280.79%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~ 2010 as compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. The decrease reflects ~~lower~~increases of $1.4 million in legal expenses and $1.3 million in professional services costs impacted by merger related activity. Offsetting these increases were lower labor costs of $1.58 million as a result of headcount reductions during 2009., ~~This~~lower ~~decrease~~recruiting incosts ~~labor~~of ~~costs~~$0.4 ~~included~~million and lower ~~accrued~~bad ~~annual~~debt ~~incentive compensation~~expenses of $0.45 million.

~~The~~For the six months ended June 30, 2010, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.56 million, ~~general~~or ~~and~~14.6%, ~~administrative~~compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease ~~also~~included ~~includes~~lower labor costs of $3.3 million as a result of headcount reductions during 2009, lower ~~legal~~recruiting ~~fees~~costs of $01.50 million, lower bad debt ~~expense~~expenses of $01.50 million, lower ~~recruiting~~travel and other general administrative costs of $0.67 million, ~~and~~partially ~~various~~offset ~~other~~by ~~expense~~higher ~~reductions~~consulting infees ~~the~~of ~~business~~$1.6 ~~totaling~~million and higher legal costs of $0.49 ~~million~~impacted by merger related activity.

Restructuring

During the first quarter of 2009, we executed a workforce reduction which included terminating the employment of approximately 175 employees. We reduced staff in our services and client solutions organizations to better align with current and projected business volumes, and we also made other workforce reductions across various businesses and back office divisions. These reductions, together with severance costs resulting from the departure of an executive officer of approximately $0.6 million, resulted in a total charge of $5.4 million for severance related costs. No such restructuring occurred in ~~the first quarter of~~ 2010.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.24 million, or 25.45%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as ~~compared~~and to$0.6 ~~the~~million, ~~three~~or 3.9%, for the six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009.

Gain on Sale of Assets

We recorded a $0.48 million gain for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 resulting from the completion of earn out post-closing milestones ~~associated~~ associated with our fourth quarter 2007 sale of our Clinical Practice Model Resource Center (“CPMRC”) business. All remaining earn out payments were received in 2009 with no further payments expected.

~~Loss~~Gain (loss) on Investments, Net

~~We recorded~~Gain an(loss) ~~unrealized~~on ~~gain of $0.2 million reflecting an increase in the fair value of our auction rate securities~~investments, ornet ~~ARS,~~is ~~purchased~~comprised ~~through UBS Financial Services, or UBS, for the three months ended March 31, 2010. In addition, we recorded an unrealized loss~~ of ~~$0.4 million for~~ the ~~three~~following ~~months ended March 31, 2010 reflecting the change~~ (in ~~the~~thousands): ~~fair value of our UBS put option.~~


	For the Three Months Ended June 30 ,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Realized loss on sale of Goldman Sachs ARS	$	(1,501	)	$	—		$	(1,501	)	$	—
Change in/reversal of fair value of UBS put options related to redemptions		(2,209	)		(218	)		(2,646	)		(600	)
Change in/reversal of fair value of UBS ARS related to redemptions		2,137			909			2,348			1,133

Loss on investment, net	$	(1,573	)	$	691		$	(1,799	)	$	533

During the second quarter of 2010, as a result of unsolicited offers, we sold $15.4 million in par value of the Goldman Sachs ARS for $13.9 million. The realized loss on this sale was $1.5 million. Under the terms of the UBS right, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we sold UBS ARS securities at par in the amount of $14.0 million and $18.6 million. On June 30, 2010, we exercised our right to sell the remaining $17.2 million of UBS ARS to UBS at par. This transaction resulted in a loss on investments of $0.1 million for the second quarter, which was comprised of the reversal of the UBS put option valuation of $2.2 million offset by the reversal of the fair value of the UBS ARS of $2.1 million.

Interest Income

Interest income decreased $0.43 million, or 5045.84%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 asand ~~compared~~$0.7 tomillion, ~~the~~or ~~three~~48.4%, for the six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower ARS investment balances due to sales and redemptions during ~~2009~~ ~~and~~ 2010 and lower interest rates on our ARS investments and cash and cash equivalents in 2010 as compared to 2009.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $0.87 million, or 6972.92%, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and $1.5 million, or 71.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the ~~corresponding~~ ~~period~~same periods in 2009. The decrease in interest expense reflects lower average outstanding debt balances due to ~~lower interest rates and~~ the timing of payments on the $125.0 million long-term revolving line of credit financing arrangement we entered into in August 2008 (the “Credit Facility”) and lower interest rates in 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009.

Provision for Income Taxes

For the three months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010, we recorded income tax expense of $52.13 million as compared to $03.71 million for the three months ended ~~March 31~~ June 30, 2009. The $3.6 million increase in income tax expense year over year is directly related to the increase in income before income taxes. The effective tax rate was 4858.65% and 51.3% for the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010 and was negative for the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2009. The tax rates for these periods were based on the forecasted pretax earnings mix by jurisdiction of Eclipsys and its subsidiaries after considering any discrete items in the interim periods. The ~~negative~~ effective ~~tax~~ rate for the three ~~months ended March 31, 2009 was impacted by the pre-tax loss for the quarter~~ and ~~the~~six respective shortfall for share-based compensations awards to the extent that the cumulative recognized book stock compensation expense for that award exceeds the associated tax deductions. The 48.6% effective rate for the three months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010 was higher than statutory rates primarily due to the tax effect of share-based compensation shortfalls. ~~and~~The ~~deemed~~negative ~~dividend distributions~~effective ~~from~~tax ~~foreign~~rate ~~subsidiaries.~~for the three and six months

ended June 30, 2009 was impacted by the pre-tax loss for the period and the respective shortfall for share-based compensations awards to the extent that the cumulative recognized book stock compensation expense for that award exceeds the associated tax deductions.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and cash equivalents at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 were $~~118~~143.73 million representing a $420.51 million ~~decrease~~increase from December 31, 2009. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, operating activities provided $1537.96 million of cash compared to $1937.78 million for the same period in 2009. Cash flow from operating activities reflects income generated from operations of $2651.70 million, after adjusting for non-cash items of $2143.29 million, which included depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, provision for bad debts, non-cash deferred tax provision, gain on sale of assets, gain (loss) on investments, net, and other reconciling items. Cash flow from operating activities after non-cash items, described above, ~~decreased~~increased $915.89 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009.

Based on the reconciliation of net income (loss) to operating cash flow, net changes in operating assets and liabilities used $1013.83 million of cash related to operating activities. This change is primarily the result of the following changes in working capital from December 31, 2009:

• A cash flow decrease due to an increase in accounts receivable of $19.54 million related to current period billings and revenues recognized in excess of cash collections, ~~that~~which ~~were~~we ~~lower~~expect ~~than~~to ~~current~~improve ~~period~~the ~~billings~~second ~~and~~half ~~revenues~~of ~~recognized~~2010;

• A cash flow increase due to an increase in deferred revenue of $2.5.9 million due to an increase in billings in excess of software license and maintenance fees revenues recognized;

• A cash flow ~~decrease~~increase due to aan ~~decrease~~increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities of $30.85 million due to timing of cash payments; and

• A cash flow decrease due to a decrease in accrued compensation of $912.4 million primarily due to the 2010 payment ~~under~~for the 2009 incentive compensation plan.

Investing activities ~~used~~provided $105.23 million of cash during the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2010, which included:

• Proceeds of $432.65 million related to sales and redemptions of ~~UBS~~ARS ~~purchased securities~~investments, offset by

• Payments of $612.72 million related to capital expenditures, ~~and~~

• Payments of $812.15 million related to capitalized investments in software development., and

~~Financing~~• ~~activities~~A ~~used~~ cash ofdecrease ~~$10.4~~resulting ~~million~~from ~~during~~an ~~the~~increase ~~first~~in ~~quarter~~restricted ofcash ~~2010~~related asto aletters ~~result~~ of ~~our~~credit of $142.05 million ~~long-term debt pay down, offset by $3~~.~~6 million received from stock option exercises and employee stock purchases.~~

Financing activities used cash of $22.8 million during the first six months of 2010 as a result of our $29.0 million long-term debt pay down, offset by $6.4 million received from stock option exercises and employee stock purchases.

Future Capital Requirements

Our future cash requirements will depend on a number of factors including the timing and level of our new sales volumes and cash collections, the cost of our development efforts, expenditures for property and equipment and acquisitions, and the success and market acceptance of our future product releases~~, and other items~~. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our principal source of liquidity is our cash and cash ~~equivalents~~ equivalents balances of $~~118~~143.73 million and cash generated from our operations. We also have $~~108~~123.1 million available for borrowings under the $125.0 million Credit Facility. All loans under the Credit Facility may be prepaid at any time and are due and payable on August 26, 2011 subject to mandatory prepayment obligations upon material asset sales, as described in the Credit Facility. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents combined with our anticipated cash flows from operations and, if necessary, available borrowings under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund our current operations and capital requirements for the next twelve months.

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents combined with our anticipated cash flows from operations and, if necessary, available borrowings under our Credit Facility, will be sufficient to fund our current operations and capital requirements for the next twelve months. We will also have the option beginning June 30, 2010 to redeem the par value of our UBS investments totaling $31.2 million. During April 2010, we repaid the remaining $15 million on the Credit Facility.

Fair Value of Investments

As of ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010, we held approximately $8640.61 million par value of investments in ARS all of which ~~$31.2 million~~ was purchased through ~~UBS~~Goldman Sachs and ~~$55~~is comprised of Triple-A rated pools of student loans.~~4 million~~ ~~was~~We have recorded a cumulative temporary loss on the ARS purchased through Goldman Sachs of $2.7 million, Asas of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), reflecting the ~~par~~decline in the fair value of ~~our~~these ~~ARS~~securities, isas ~~comprised~~these ofsecurities ~~the~~remain ~~following~~classified ~~(in~~as ~~thousands):~~available for sale.

	UBS		GoldmanSachs
Triple-A rated pools of student loans	$	28,025	$	40,050
A3 rated pools of student loans		3,150		—
B3 rated pools of student loans		—		15,400
Total	$	31,175	$	55,450

In evaluating our ARS purchased from Goldman Sachs for other-than-temporary impairment, as of June 30, 2010, we considered several factors related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments including a number of qualitative factors such as: the loans are sufficiently collateralized; all of the underlying student loans in the Goldman Sachs’ portfolio are guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”); there have been principal repayments of some of the securities to investors; we continue to earn interest on the securities at market rates; and

~~These~~26 investments have long-term nominal maturities for which the interest rates were structured to be reset through a Dutch auction each month. Prior to February 2008, monthly auctions historically provided a liquid market for these securities. However, in February 2008, the broker-dealers managing our ARS portfolio experienced failed auctions in which the amount of ARS submitted for sale exceeded the amount of purchase orders. Our ARS continued to fail to settle at auctions through the first quarter of 2010. We continue to earn interest on these investments at the contractual rate.

On November 12, 2008, we entered into a settlement agreement with UBS pursuant to which we (1) received the right (the “put option”) to sell the ARS, originally purchased through UBS, at par value, to UBS between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012, and (2) gave UBS the right to purchase the ARS, originally purchased through UBS, from us any time after the acceptance date of the settlement agreement as long as we receive the par value of the securities.

As of March 31, 2010, we recorded these investments, including the put option, at their estimated fair value of $81.4 million. Each of our individual ARS holdings was in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2010. Due to events in the credit markets, quoted prices of the ARS in active markets are not readily available at this time. We estimate the fair value of these ARS based on various factors using a trinomial discount model. The model considers possible cash flows and probabilities which are forecasted under a number of potential scenarios. Each scenario’s cash flow is multiplied by the probability of that scenario occurring. The major inputs are as follows: forecasted maximum interest rates, probability of passing auction or early redemption, probability of failing auction, probability of default at auction, severity of default, and the discount rate. We also considered the credit quality and duration of the securities. We accounted for illiquidity by using a discount rate within the valuation, with an additional spread representing the additional rates of return investors would require for certain securities to hold those securities in an illiquid environment. The put option was valued using a valuation approach for forward contracts in which one party agrees to sell a financial instrument to another party at a particular time for a particular price. In this approach, the present value of all expected future cash flows are subtracted from the current fair value of the security. The resulting value is calculated as a future value at an interest rate reflective of counterparty risk. There have not been any changes in our valuation model for ARS and the put option from December 31, 2009.

The assumptions that we used to determine the fair value estimates of the ARS and put option were highly subjective and, therefore, were considered Level 3 unobservable inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of these assets represents 53.8% of total assets measured at fair value. The estimate of the fair value of the ARS we hold could change significantly based on future market conditions. For additional information on our investments, see Note I – Fair Value Measurement.

We have accounted for the put option as a freestanding financial instrument and elected to record the value under the fair value option. The fair value of the put option, previously recorded as an asset, decreased $0.4 million during the first quarter of 2010, with a corresponding charge to earnings for the change in the fair value. We expect that the future changes in the fair value of the put option will generally offset the fair value movements in the related UBS purchased ARS. We have recorded a cumulative temporary loss on the ARS purchased through Goldman Sachs of $5.3 million, as of March 31, 2010, in accumulated other comprehensive loss, reflecting the decline in the fair value of these securities, as these securities remain classified as available for sale.

In evaluating our ARS purchased from Goldman Sachs for other than temporary impairment, as of March 31, 2010, we considered several factors related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments including a number of qualitative factors such as: the loans are sufficiently collateralized; all of the underlying student loans in the Goldman Sachs’ portfolio are guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”); there have been principal repayments of some of the securities to investors; we continue to earn interest on the securities at market rates; and there was continued evidence of improvement in the secondary market for ARS during the first quarter of 2010. We believe these investments continue to be of high credit quality, and we currently do not intend to sell the securities, “more likely than not” will not be required to sell the securities before recovering our cost, and expect to recover the securities’ entire amortized cost basis. Accordingly, we have classified these securities as long-term investments in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment losses, including any credit loss, occurred for the three months ended March 31, 2010. We will continue to analyze our ARS purchased from Goldman Sachs each reporting period for impairment and may be required to record an impairment charge in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations if the decline in fair value of the Goldman Sachs purchased ARS is determined to be other-than-temporary. In April 2010, as a result of unsolicited offers, we sold $15.4 million of available for sale ARS for $13.9 million. The realized loss of $1.5 million will be recorded in the second quarter of 2010.

there was continued evidence of improvement in the secondary market for ARS during the second quarter of 2010. We believe these investments continue to be of high credit quality, and we currently do not intend to sell the securities, “more likely than not” will not be required to sell the securities before recovering our cost, and expect to recover the securities’ entire amortized cost basis. Accordingly, we have classified these securities as long-term investments in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment losses, including any credit loss, occurred for the three months ended June 30, 2010. We will continue to analyze our ARS purchased from Goldman Sachs each reporting period for impairment and may be required to record an impairment charge in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations if the decline in fair value of the Goldman Sachs purchased ARS is determined to be other-than-temporary. In April 2010, as a result of unsolicited offers, we sold $15.4 million in par value of available for sale ARS for $13.9 million. The realized loss of $1.5 million was recorded in gain (loss) on investments, net.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 25, 2010.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We do not currently use derivative financial instruments or enter into foreign currency hedge transactions. Foreign currency fluctuations through ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 have not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We continually monitor our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and may use derivative financial instruments and hedging transactions in the future if, in our judgment, the circumstances warrant their use. We believe most of our international operations are naturally hedged for foreign currency risk as our foreign subsidiaries invoice their clients and satisfy their obligations primarily in their local currencies with the exception of our development center in India. Our development center in India is not naturally hedged for foreign currency risk since their obligations are paid in their local currency but are funded in U.S. dollars. There can be no guarantee that the impact of foreign currency fluctuations in the future will not be significant and will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

We hold investments in ARS. These ARS are debt instruments with long-term nominal maturities that previously could be sold via Dutch auctions every 7, 14, 21, 28, or 35 days, creating a short-term instrument. In February 2008, broker-dealers holding our ARS portfolio experienced failed auctions in which the amount of ARS submitted for sale exceeded the amount of related purchase orders. Our ARS continued to fail to settle at auctions through the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010. We continue to earn interest on these investments at the contractual rate, and the ARS that we hold have not been placed on credit watch by credit rating agencies. The average interest rate, based on the par value of the ARS, earned on the majority of these investments for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 was 1.59%. For further information on ARS investments, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” discussion above.

Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that declined in market value due to changes in interest rates.

The following table illustrates potential fluctuation in annualized interest income based upon hypothetical values for blended interest rates for hypothetical ARS balances (we currently earn interest on $8640.61 million par value of ARS):

Hypothetical Interest Rate	Investment balances (in thousands)
	$	6520,000	$	7530,000	$	8540,000
0.5%		~~325~~100		~~375~~150		~~425~~200
1.0%		~~650~~200		~~750~~300		~~850~~400
1.5%		~~975~~300		~~1,125~~450		~~1,275~~600
2.0%		~~1,300~~400		~~1,500~~600		~~1,700~~800
2.5%		~~1,625~~500		~~1,875~~750		21,~~125~~000

We estimate that a one-percentage point decrease in interest rates for our long-term investment securities portfolio as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 would have resulted in a decrease in interest income of $0.94 million for a 12 month period, based on ana $8540.0 million investment balance. ~~This~~ This sensitivity analysis contains certain simplifying assumptions, including a constant level of investment securities and an immediate across-the-board increase or decrease in the level of interest rates with no other subsequent changes for the remainder of the period, and it does not consider the impact of changes in the portfolio as a result of our business needs or as a response to changes in the market. Therefore, although it gives an indication of our exposure to changes in interest rates, it is not intended to predict future results, and our actual results will likely vary.

2327

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents balance earning interest was $~~104~~121.17 million of the $~~118~~145.78 million in cash and cash equivalents held as of that date. This amount includes $2.5 million of restricted cash, which also earns interest. The weighted average interest rate on our cash and cash equivalents was 0.2% as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The following table illustrates potential fluctuations in annualized interest income based upon hypothetical values for blended interest rates for hypothetical cash and cash equivalents balances:

Hypothetical Interest Rate	Cash and cash equivalent balances (in thousands)
	$	90115,000	$	~~100~~125,000	$	~~110~~135,000
0.1%		90115		~~100~~125		~~110~~135
0.2%		~~180~~230		~~200~~250		~~220~~270
0.3%		~~270~~345		~~300~~375		~~330~~405
0.4%		~~360~~460		~~400~~500		~~440~~540
0.5%		~~450~~575		~~500~~625		~~550~~675

We estimate that a one tenth-percentage point decrease in interest rate for our cash and cash equivalents earning interest as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 would have resulted in a decrease in interest income of $~~100~~125,000 for a 12 month period, based on a $~~100~~125.0 million investment balance. This sensitivity analysis contains certain simplifying assumptions, including a constant level of cash and cash equivalents and an immediate across-the-board increase or decrease in the level of interest rates with no other subsequent changes for the remainder of the period, and it does not consider the impact of changes in the balance of cash and cash equivalents as a result of our business needs. Therefore, although it gives an indication of our exposure to changes in interest rates, it is not intended to predict future results, and our actual results will likely vary.

On August 26, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement pursuant to which we received a senior secured revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, all borrowings under the Credit Facility ~~totaled~~have been repaid. However, we have issued $151.09 million of letters of credit under this Credit Facility. The interest rate applicable to ~~the~~ borrowed ~~amount~~amounts is based, at our option, on the prime rate, one-month LIBOR rate, three-month LIBOR rate, six-month LIBOR rate or 12-month LIBOR rate at the initial debt draw date and interest rate contract end date plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin, which is based on our leverage ratio, was 1.5% as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, is the ratio of (i) funded debt to (ii) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization plus or minus certain other adjustments, for the four consecutive fiscal quarters as of the last day of each current fiscal quarter. As of March 31, 2010, our effective interest rate was 1.75%. Based on borrowings of $15 million, as of March 31, 2010, for each percentage point increase in the interest rate, annual interest expense would increase $0.2 million. This sensitivity analysis contains certain simplifying assumptions, including a constant level and rate of outstanding debt under the Credit Facility, an immediate across-the-board increase or decrease in the level of interest rates with no other subsequent changes for the remainder of the period, and it does not consider the impact of changes in the outstanding debt as a result of our business needs or as a response to changes in the market. Therefore, although it gives an indication of our exposure to changes in interest rates, it is not intended to predict future results, and our actual results will likely vary.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives of ensuring that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There is no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will operate effectively under all circumstances. Based upon the evaluation described above our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter-ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

2428

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information set forth under Note K - Contingencies to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Many risks affect our business. These risks include, but are not limited to, those described below, each of which may be relevant to decisions regarding an investment in or ownership of our stock. We have attempted to organize the description of these risks into logical groupings to enhance readability, but many of the risks interrelate or could be grouped or ordered in other ways, so no special significance should be attributed to these groupings or order. The occurrence of any of these risks could have a significant adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~RISKS~~We ~~RELATING~~have TOmodified ~~DEVELOPMENT~~the ~~AND~~version of the ~~OPERATION~~risk OFfactors ~~OUR~~titled ~~SOFTWARE~~“The healthcare industry faces financial constraints that could adversely affect the demand for Eclipsys’ software and services” from the versions thereof included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “10-K”) and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “First Quarter 10-Q”) to reflect the passage of time and progressing schedule for incentives under the HITECH Act.

In addition to the risks below under the heading “RISKS RELATED TO ECLIPSYS’ BUSINESS,” which we included in the 10-K and First Quarter 10-Q, the pending Merger with Allscripts and the related Coniston Transactions impose additional risks. Further, because Eclipsys stockholders will receive Allscripts shares in exchange for their Eclipsys shares in the Merger, Eclipsys stockholders will be subject to risks affecting Allscripts business, some of which are similar to the risks affecting Eclipsys’ business, some of which are more particular to Allscripts. These additional risks are set forth below under the headings “Risks Related to the Merger,” “Risks Related to the Coniston Transactions,” and “Risks Related to Allscripts Business.”

Further, as a result of the Merger Agreement, the market value of Eclipsys shares is a function of the market value of Allscripts shares based upon the merger exchange ratio, so problems with Allscripts that negatively affect the market value of Allscripts shares can be expected to have a negative effect on the value of Eclipsys shares, and positive developments for Eclipsys might not have the same positive effect on the market value of Eclipsys shares as if the Merger had not been announced.

RISKS RELATED TO ECLIPSYS’ BUSINESS

Risks Relating To Development And Operation Of Our Software

Our software may not operate properly, which could damage our reputation and impair our sales.

Software development is time consuming, expensive and complex. Unforeseen difficulties can arise. We may encounter technical obstacles and additional issues ~~problems~~ that prevent our software from operating properly. Client environments and practice patterns are widely divergent; consequently, there is significant variability in the configuration of our software from client to client, and we are not able to identify, test for, and resolve in advance all issues that may be encountered by clients. These risks are generally higher for newer software, until we have enough experience with the software to have addressed issues that are discovered in disparate client circumstances and environments, and for new installations, until potential issues associated with each new client’s particular environment and configurability are identified and addressed. Due to our ongoing ~~development~~ development efforts, at any point in time, we generally have significant software that could be considered relatively new and therefore more vulnerable to these risks. It is also possible that future releases of our software, which would typically ~~include~~ include additional features, may be delayed or may require additional work to address issues that may be discovered as the software is introduced into our client base. If our software contains errors or does not function consistent with software specifications or client expectations, we could be subject to significant contractual damages or contract terminations and face serious harm to our reputation, and our sales could be negatively affected.

Our software development efforts may be inefficient or ineffective, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We face intense competition in the marketplace and are confronted by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and user needs and the frequent introduction of new software and enhancements by our competitors. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to enhance our existing software and services, and to timely develop and introduce competing new software and services with features and pricing that meet changing client and market requirements. We schedule and prioritize these development efforts according to a variety of factors, including our perceptions of market trends, client requirements, and resource availability. Our software solutions are complex and require a significant investment of time and resources to develop, test, introduce into use, and enhance. These activities can take longer than we expect. We may encounter unanticipated difficulties that require us to re-direct or scale-back our efforts and we may need to modify our plans in response to changes in client requirements, market demands, resource availability, regulatory requirements, or other factors. These factors place significant demands upon our software development organization, require complex planning and decision making, and can result in acceleration of some initiatives and delay of others. If we do not manage our development efforts efficiently and effectively, we may fail to produce, or timely produce, software that responds appropriately to our clients’ needs, or we may fail to meet client expectations regarding new or enhanced features and functionality.

Market changes could decrease the demand for our software or increase our development costs.

The healthcare information technology market is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards and new software introductions and enhancements that may render existing software obsolete or less competitive. Our position in the market could erode rapidly due to the development of regulatory or industry standards that our software may not fully meet or due to changes in the features and functions of competing software, as well as the pricing models for such software. If software development for the healthcare information technology market becomes significantly more expensive due to changes in regulatory requirements or healthcare industry practices, or other factors, we may find ourselves at a disadvantage to larger competitors with more financial resources to devote to development. If we are unable to enhance our existing software and services, and to timely develop and introduce competing new software and services with features and pricing that meet changing client and market requirements, demand for our software will suffer and it will be more difficult for us to recover the cost of product development.

2530

Any failure by us to protect our intellectual property, or any misappropriation of it, could enable our competitors to market software with similar features, which could reduce demand for our software.

We are dependent upon our proprietary information and technology. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate to prevent misappropriation. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not enable us to protect our proprietary rights in those jurisdictions. Also, despite the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary rights, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy aspects of our software, reverse engineer our software or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Furthermore, it may be possible for our competitors to copy or gain access to our software. In some limited instances, clients can access source-code versions of our software, subject to contractual limitations on the permitted use of the source code. ~~Furthermore, it may be possible for our competitors to copy or gain access to our software.~~ Although our license agreements with clients attempt to prevent misuse of our source code and other trade secrets, the possession of our source code or trade secrets by third parties increases the ease and likelihood of potential misappropriation of our software. Furthermore, others could independently develop technologies similar or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights.

Failure of security features of our software could expose us to significant liabilities.

Clients use our systems to store and transmit highly confidential patient health information. Because of the sensitivity of this information, security features of our software are very important. If, notwithstanding our efforts, our software security features do not function properly, or client systems using our software are compromised, we could face claims for contract breach, fines, penalties and other liabilities for violation of applicable laws or regulations, and significant costs for remediation and re-engineering to prevent future occurrences.

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~SALES~~Sales ~~AND~~And ~~IMPLEMENTATION~~Implementation OFOf ~~OUR~~Our ~~SOFTWARE~~Software

Our sales process can be long and expensive and may not result in revenues, and the length of our sales and implementation cycles may adversely affect our operating results.

The sales cycle for our hospital software ranges from 6 to 18 months or more from initial contact to contract execution. Our hospital implementation cycle has generally ranged from 6 to 36 months from contract execution to completion of implementation. During the sales and implementation cycles, we expend substantial time, effort and resources preparing contract proposals, negotiating the contract and implementing the software. Our sales efforts may not result in a sale, in which case we will not realize any revenues to offset these expenditures. If we do complete a sale, revenue recognition can be delayed or fall below expectations if accounting principles do not allow us to recognize revenues in the same periods in which corresponding sales and implementation expenses were incurred, or clients decide to delay purchasing or implementing our software or reduce the scope of products purchased.

We may experience implementation delays that could harm our reputation and violate contractual commitments.

Some of our software, particularly our hospital enterprise software, is complex, requires a lengthy and expensive implementation process, and requires our clients to make a substantial commitment of their own time and resources and to make significant organizational and process changes. If our clients are unable to fulfill their implementation responsibilities in a timely fashion, our projects may be delayed or become less profitable. Each client’s situation is different, and unanticipated difficulties and delays may arise as a result of failures by us or the client to meet our respective implementation responsibilities or other factors. Because of the complexity of the implementation process, delays are sometimes difficult to attribute solely to us or the client. Implementation delays could motivate clients to delay payments or attempt to cancel their contracts with us or seek other remedies from us. Any inability or perceived inability to implement our software consistent with a client’s schedule could harm our reputation and be a competitive disadvantage for us as we pursue new business. Our ability to improve sales depends upon many factors, including successful and timely completion of implementation and successful use of our software in live environments by clients who are willing to become reference sites for us.

Implementation costs may exceed our expectations, which can negatively affect our operating results.

Each client’s circumstances may include unforeseen issues that make it more difficult or costly than anticipated to implement our software. As a result, we may fail to project, price or manage our implementation services correctly. If we do not have sufficient qualified personnel to fulfill our implementation commitments in a timely fashion, or if our personnel take longer than budgeted to implement our solutions, our operating results will be negatively affected. Similarly, if we must supplement our capabilities with third-party consultants, who are generally more expensive, our costs will increase.

2631

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~OUR~~Our ~~INFORMATION~~Information ~~TECHNOLOGY~~Technology (IT) OROr ~~TECHNOLOGY~~Technology ~~SERVICES~~Services

Various risks could interrupt clients’ access to their data residing in our service center, exposing us to significant costs and other liabilities.

We provide remote hosting services that involve running our software and third-party vendors’ software for clients in our Technology Solutions Center. The ability to access the systems and the data that the Technology Solution Center hosts and supports on demand is critical to our clients. Our operations are vulnerable to interruption and/or damage from a number of sources, many of which are beyond our control, including, without limitation: (i) power loss and telecommunications failures; (ii) fire, flood, hurricane and other natural disasters; (iii) software and hardware errors, failures or crashes; and (iv) computer viruses, hacking and similar disruptive problems. We attempt to mitigate these risks through various means including redundant infrastructure, disaster recovery plans, separate test systems and change control and system security measures, but our precautions may not protect against all problems. In addition, our disaster recovery and business continuity plans rely upon third-party providers of related services, and if those vendors fail us at a time that our center is not operating correctly, we could be unable to fulfill our contractual service commitments notwithstanding our attempts to mitigate the risks. If clients’ access is interrupted because of problems in the operation of our Technology Solutions Center, we could be exposed to significant claims by clients or their patients. Furthermore, interruption of access to data could result in a loss of revenue and liability under our client contracts, and any significant instances of system downtime could negatively affect our reputation and ability to sell our remote hosting services.

Any breach of confidentiality of client or patient data in our possession could expose us to significant expense and harm our reputation.

We must maintain facility and systems security measures to preserve the confidentiality of data belonging to our clients and their patients that resides on computer equipment in our Technology Solution Center that we handle in our outsourcing operations, or that is otherwise in our possession. Notwithstanding the efforts we undertake to protect data, our measures can be vulnerable to infiltration as well as unintentional lapse, and if confidential information is compromised, we could face claims for contract breach, penalties and other liabilities for violation of applicable laws or regulations, significant costs for remediation and re-engineering to prevent future occurrences, and serious harm to our reputation.

Recruiting challenges and higher than anticipated costs in outsourcing our clients’ IT operations may adversely affect our profitability.

We provide outsourcing services that involve operating clients’ IT departments using our employees. At the initiation of these relationships, clients often require us to hire, at substantially the same compensation, the IT staff that had been performing the services we take on. In these circumstances, our costs may be higher than we target unless and until we are able to transition the workforce, methods and systems to a more scalable model. Various factors can make this transition difficult, including geographic dispersion of client facilities and variation in client needs, IT environments, and system configurations. Also, under some circumstances, we may incur significant costs as a successor employer by inheriting obligations of that client for which we may not be indemnified. Further, facilities management contracts require us to provide the IT services specified by contract, and in some places or at some times it can be difficult to recruit qualified IT personnel, which cause us to incur higher costs by raising salaries or relocating personnel.

Inability to obtain consents needed from third -party software providers could impair our ability to provide remote IT or technology services.

We and our clients need consent from some third-party software providers as a condition to running the providers’ software in our service center, or to allow our employees who work in client locations under facilities management arrangements to have access to their software. Vendors’ refusal to give such consents, or insistence upon unreasonable conditions to such consents, could reduce our revenue opportunities and make our IT or technology services less viable for some clients.

2732

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~THE~~The ~~HEALTHCARE~~Healthcare IT ~~INDUSTRY~~Industry ~~AND~~And ~~MARKET~~Market

We operate in an intensely competitive market that includes companies that have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do.

We face intense competition in the marketplace. We are confronted by rapidly changing technology, evolving user needs and the frequent introduction by our competitors of new and enhanced software. Our principal competitors in our software business include Cerner Corporation, Epic Systems Corporation, GE Healthcare, Medical Information Technology, Inc., McKesson Corporation, and Siemens AG. Other software competitors include providers of practice management, general decision support and database systems, as well as segment-specific applications and healthcare technology consultants. Our services business competes with large consulting firms, as well as independent providers of technology implementation and other services. Our outsourcing business competes with large national providers of technology solutions such as Computer Sciences Corporation, Dell Perot Systems, and IBM Corporation, as well as smaller firms. Several of our existing and potential competitors are better established, benefit from greater name recognition and have significantly more financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. In addition, some competitors, particularly those with a more diversified revenue base or that are privately held, may have greater flexibility than we do to compete aggressively on the basis of price and to provide favorable financing terms to clients. Vigorous and evolving competition could lead to a loss of our market share or pressure on our prices and could make it more difficult to grow our business profitably.

The principal factors that affect competition within our market include software functionality, performance, flexibility and features, use of open industry standards, compliance with industry standards, speed and quality of implementation and client service and support, company reputation, price and total cost of ownership. We anticipate continued consolidation in both the information technology and healthcare industries and large integrated technology companies may become more active in our markets, both through acquisition and internal investment. There is a finite number of hospitals and other healthcare providers in our target market. As costs fall, technology improves, and market factors continue to compel investment by healthcare organizations in software and services like ours, market saturation may change the competitive landscape in favor of larger competitors with greater scale.

Clients that use our legacy software are vulnerable to sales efforts of our competitors.

A significant part of our revenue comes from relatively high-margin legacy software that was installed by our clients many years ago. As the marketplace becomes more saturated and technology advances, there will be increased competition to retain existing clients, particularly those using older generation products, and loss of this business would adversely affect our results of operations. We attempt to convert clients using legacy software to our newer generation software, but such conversions may require significant investments of time and resources by clients.

The healthcare industry faces financial constraints that could adversely affect the demand for our software and services.

~~Our~~Acquisition and implementation of our software often involves a significant financial commitment by our clients. Our ability to grow our business is largely dependent on our clients’ information technology budgets, which in part depend on our clients’ cash generation and access to other sources of liquidity. Recent financial market disruptions have adversely affected the availability of external financing, and led to tighter lending standards and interest rate concerns. In addition, the healthcare industry faces significant financial constraints specific to the industry. Managed healthcare puts pressure on healthcare organizations to reduce costs, and regulatory changes and payor requirements have reduced reimbursements to healthcare organizations. For example, the Inpatient Prospective Payment System rules, published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid in the U.S., identified several “hospital-acquired conditions” for which treatment will no longer be reimbursed by Medicare. Federal, state and local governments and private payors are imposing other requirements that may have the effect of reducing payments to healthcare organizations.

These factors can reduce access to cash for our clients and potential clients. In addition, many of our clients’ budgets rely in part on investment earnings, which decrease when portfolio investment values decline. Economic factors are causing many clients to take a conservative approach to investments, including the purchase of systems like those we sell, and to seek pricing and financing concessions from vendors like us. If healthcare information technology spending declines or increases more slowly than we anticipate, or if we are not able to offer competitive pricing or financing terms, demand for our software could be adversely affected and our revenue could fall short of our expectations. Challenging economic conditions also may impair the ability of our clients to pay for our software and services for which they have contracted. As a result, reserves for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable may increase, resulting in increased bad debt expense.

2833

Healthcare industry consolidation could put pressure on our software prices, reduce our potential client base and reduce demand for our software.

Many healthcare organizations have consolidated to create larger healthcare enterprises. If this consolidation trend continues, it could reduce our potential client base and give the resulting enterprises greater bargaining power, each of which may lead to erosion of the prices for our software. In addition, when healthcare organizations combine they often consolidate infrastructure including IT systems, and acquisitions of our clients could erode our revenue base.

Changes in standards applicable to our software could require us to incur substantial additional development costs.

Integration and interoperability of the software and systems provided by various vendors are important issues in the healthcare industry. Market forces, regulatory authorities and industry organizations are causing the emergence of standards for software features and performance that are applicable to our products. Healthcare standards and ultimately the functionality demands of the electronic health record, or EHR, are now expanding to support community health, public health, public policy and population health initiatives. In addition, interoperability and health information exchange features that support emerging and enabling technologies are becoming increasingly important to our clients and require us to undertake large scale product enhancements and redesign.

For example, the Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology, or CCHIT, maintains comprehensive and growing sets of criteria for the functionality, interoperability, and security of healthcare software in the U.S. Achieving CCHIT certification is evolving as a de facto competitive requirement, resulting in increased research and development expense to conform to these requirements. Similar dynamics are evolving in international markets. CCHIT requirements may diverge from our software’s characteristics and our development direction. We may choose not to apply for CCHIT certification of certain modules of our software or to delay applying for certification. The CCHIT application process requires conformity with 100% of all criteria applicable to each module in order to achieve certification and there is no assurance that we will receive or retain certification for any particular module notwithstanding application. Certification for a software module lasts for two years and must then be re-secured, and certification requirements evolve, so even certifications we receive may be lost. In addition, U.S. government initiatives, such as the HITECH Act described below, and related industry trends are resulting in comprehensive and evolving standards related to interoperability, privacy, and other features that are becoming mandatory for systems purchased by governmental healthcare providers and other providers receiving governmental payments, including Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. Various state and foreign governments are also developing similar standards, which may be different and even more demanding.

Our software does not conform to all of these standards, and conforming to these standards is expected to consume a substantial and increasing portion of our development resources. If our software is not consistent with emerging standards, our market position and sales could be impaired and we will have to upgrade our software to remain competitive in the market. We expect compliance with these kinds of standards to become increasingly important to clients and therefore to our ability to sell our software. If we make the wrong decisions about compliance with these standards, or are late in conforming our software to these standards, or if despite our efforts our software fails standards compliance testing, our offerings will be at a disadvantage in the market to the offerings of competitors who have complied.

The HITECH Act is resulting in new business imperatives, and failure to provide our clients with health information technology systems that are “certified” under the HITECH Act could result in breach of some client obligations and put us at a competitive disadvantage.

The HITECH Act, which is a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, provides financial incentives for hospitals and doctors that are “meaningful EHR users,” which includes use of health information technology systems that are “certified” according to technical standards developed under the supervision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. In addition, the HITECH Act imposes certain requirements upon governmental agencies to use, and require ~~health~~healthcare ~~care~~ providers, health plans, and insurers contracting with such agencies to use, systems that are certified according to such standards. This has at least ~~four~~three important implications for us. First, we have invested and continue to invest in conforming our applicable clinical software to these standards and further significant investment will be required as certification standards evolve. Second, ~~because~~recently ~~the~~signed ~~HITECH Act authorizes provider incentive payments to be made available beginning in calendar year 2011 and some lead time is required to implement the technologies and for~~ clients ~~to satisfy any associated use requirements, the work we need to do to comply with the standards must be done in a compressed timeframe~~ and ~~may displace other important initiatives. Third,~~ new client prospects are requiring us to agree that our software will be certified according to applicable HITECH technical standards so that, assuming clients properly use the electronic health record software and satisfy the meaningful use and other requirements of the HITECH Act, they will qualify for available incentive payments. We plan to meet these requirements as part of our normal software maintenance obligations, and failure to comply could result in costly contract breach and jeopardize our relationships with clients who are relying upon us to provide certified software. ~~Fourth~~Third, if for some reason we are not able to comply with these standards in a timely fashion after their issuance, our offerings will be at a severe competitive disadvantage in the market to the offerings of vendors who have complied.

2934

If we fail to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified technical, marketing, sales and management personnel, our ability to execute our business strategy could be impaired.

Our success depends, in significant part, upon the continued services of our key technical, marketing, sales and management personnel, and on our ability to continue to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified employees. Competition for employees with experience in our industry can be intense and we maintain at-will employment terms with our employees. In addition, the process of recruiting personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute our business strategy can be difficult, time-consuming and expensive. We believe that our ability to implement our strategic goals depends to a considerable degree on our senior management team. The loss of any member of that team could hurt our business.

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~OUR~~Our ~~INTERNATIONAL~~International ~~BUSINESS~~Business ~~STRATEGY~~Strategy

Our growing operations in India expose us to risks that could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We have a significant workforce employed in India engaged in a broad range of development, support and corporate infrastructure activities that are integral to our business and critical to our profitability. Further, while there are certain cost advantages to operating in India, significant growth in the technology sector in India has increased competition to attract and retain skilled employees with commensurate increases in compensation costs. In the future, we may not be able to hire and retain such personnel at compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and salary structure. Many of the companies with which we compete for hiring experienced employees have greater resources than we have and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, our operations in India require ongoing capital investments and expose us to foreign currency fluctuations, which may significantly reduce or negate any cost benefit anticipated from such expansion.

In addition, our reliance on a workforce in India exposes us to disruptions in the business, political and economic environment in that region. Maintenance of a stable political environment is important to our operations, and terrorist attacks and acts of violence or war may directly affect our physical facilities and workforce or contribute to general instability. Our operations in India may also be affected by trade restrictions, such as tariffs or other trade controls, as well as other factors that may adversely affect our operations.

Our business strategy includes expansion into markets outside North America, which will require increased expenditures and if our international operations are not successfully implemented, such expansion may cause our operating results and reputation to suffer.

We are working to expand operations in markets outside North America. There is no assurance that these efforts will be successful. We have limited experience in marketing, selling, implementing and supporting our software abroad. Expansion of our international sales and operations will require a significant amount of attention from our management, establishment of service delivery and support capabilities to handle that business and commensurate financial resources, and will subject us to risks and challenges that we would not face if we conducted our business only in the United States. We may not generate sufficient revenues from international business to cover these expenses.

The risks and challenges associated with operations outside the United States may include: the need to modify our software to satisfy local requirements and standards, including associated expenses and time delays; laws and business practices favoring local competitors; compliance with multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations, including healthcare, employment, tax, privacy, healthcare information technology, and data and intellectual property protection laws and regulations; laws regulating exports of technology products from the United States; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; difficulties in setting up foreign operations, including recruiting staff and management; and longer accounts receivable payment cycles and other collection difficulties. One or more of these requirements and risks may preclude us from operating in some markets.

Foreign operations subject us to numerous stringent U.S. and foreign laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and comparable foreign laws and regulations that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by U.S. and other business entities for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. As we expand our international operations, there is some risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of our employees, consultants, sales agents or distributors, which could constitute a violation by Eclipsys of various laws including the FCPA, even though such parties are not always subject to our control. Safeguards we implement to discourage these practices may prove to be less than effective and violations of the FCPA and other laws may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, or other liabilities or proceedings against us, including class action law suits and enforcement actions from the SEC, Department of Justice and overseas regulators.

3035

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~OUR~~Our ~~OPERATING~~Operating ~~RESULTS~~Results, ~~ACCOUNTING~~Accounting ~~CONTROLS~~Controls ~~AND~~And ~~FINANCES~~Finances

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly depending upon periodic software revenues and other factors.

We have experienced significant variations in revenues and operating results from quarter to quarter. Our operating results may continue to fluctuate due to a number of factors, including:

•

The performance of our software and our ability to promptly and efficiently address software performance shortcomings or warranty issues;

•

The cost, timeliness and outcomes of our software development and implementation efforts, including expansion of our presence in India;

•

The timing, size and complexity of our software sales and implementations;

•

Healthcare industry conditions and the overall demand for healthcare information technology;

•

Variations in periodic software license revenues (as discussed more fully below);

•

The financial condition of our clients and potential clients;

•

Market acceptance of new services, software and software enhancements introduced by us or our competitors;

•

Client decisions regarding renewal or termination of their contracts;

•

Software and price competition;

•

Investment required to support our international expansion efforts;

•

Personnel changes and other organizational changes and related expenses;

•

Significant judgments and estimates made by management in the application of generally accepted accounting principles;

•

Healthcare reform measures and healthcare regulation in general;

•

Lower investment returns due to disruptions in U.S. and international financial markets;

•

Fluctuations in costs related to litigation, strategic initiatives, and acquisitions; and

•

Fluctuations in general economic and financial market conditions, including interest rates.

It is difficult to predict the timing of revenues that we receive from software sales, because the sales cycle can vary depending upon several factors. These include the size and terms of the transaction, the changing business plans of the client, the effectiveness of the client’s management, general economic conditions and the regulatory environment. The periodic software revenues we recognize in any financial reporting period include traditional license fees associated with sales made in that period, as well as revenues from contract backlog that had not previously been recognized pending contract performance that occurred or was completed during the period, and certain other activities during the period associated with existing client relationships. Although these periodic software revenues represent a relatively small portion of our overall revenue in any period, they generally have high margins and are therefore an important element of our earnings. The type and amount of these periodic revenues can fluctuate significantly from period to period for various reasons including economic conditions, market factors, and client-specific situations. These variations make it difficult to predict the nature and amount of these periodic revenues. We offer clients a subscription pricing model that allows them to pay software license fees over time, and we believe economic conditions and cash conservation by clients, attempts by clients to match their software costs more closely to funds they anticipate receiving in the future under the HITECH Act, and other factors are likely to motivate many clients in 2010 to prefer subscription pricing. While this is beneficial to our backlog and long-term revenue visibility, it may adversely affect our periodic software revenues in 2010, which will adversely affect earnings if we are not able to compensate through other revenue sources or expense controls.

Because a significant percentage of our expenses are relatively fixed, variation in the timing of sales and implementations could cause significant variations in operating results and resulting stock price volatility from quarter to quarter. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our historical results of operations are not necessarily meaningful. Investors should not rely on these comparisons as indicators of future performance.

In addition, prices for our common stock may be influenced by investor perception of us and our industry in general, research analyst recommendations, and our ability to meet or exceed quarterly performance expectations of investors or analysts.

3136

Early termination of client contracts or contract penalties could adversely affect our results of operations.

Client contracts can change or terminate early for a variety of reasons. Change of control, financial issues, declining general economic conditions or other changes in client circumstances may cause us or the client to seek to modify or terminate a contract. Further, either we or the client may generally terminate a contract for material uncured breach by the other. If we breach a contract or fail to perform in accordance with contractual service levels, we may be required to refund money previously paid to us by the client, or to pay penalties or other damages. Even if we have not breached, we may deal with various situations from time to time for the reasons described above which may result in the amendment or termination of a contract. These steps can result in significant current period charges and/or reductions in current or future revenue.

Because in many cases we recognize revenues for our software monthly over the term of a client contract, downturns or upturns in sales may not be fully reflected in our operating results until future periods.

We recognize a significant portion of our revenues from clients monthly over the terms of their agreements, which are generally for periods of 5 to 7 years and can be up to 10 years. As a result, much of the revenue that we report each quarter is attributable to agreements executed during prior quarters. Consequently, a decline in sales, client renewals, or market acceptance of our software in one quarter may negatively affect our revenues and profitability in future quarters. In addition, we may be unable to rapidly adjust our cost structure to compensate for reduced revenues. This monthly revenue recognition also makes it more difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenues through additional sales in any period, as a significant portion of revenues from new clients or new sales may be recognized over the applicable agreement term.

Loss of revenue from large clients could have significant negative impact on our results of operations and overall financial condition.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, approximately 42% of our revenues were attributable to our 20 largest clients and one client represented 13.2% of our revenues. In addition, approximately 49% of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2009 were attributable to 20 clients. Loss of revenue from significant clients or failure to collect accounts receivable, whether as a result of client payment default, contract termination, or other factors could have a significant negative impact on our results of operation and overall financial condition.

Impairment of intangible assets could increase our expenses.

A significant portion of our assets consists of intangible assets, including capitalized software development costs and goodwill and other intangibles acquired in connection with acquisitions. Current accounting standards require us to evaluate goodwill on an annual basis and other intangibles if certain triggering events occur, and adjust the carrying value of these assets to net realizable value when such testing reveals impairment of the assets. Various factors, including regulatory or competitive changes, could affect the value of our intangible assets. If we are required to write-down the value of our intangible assets due to impairment, our reported expenses will increase, resulting in a corresponding decrease in our reported profit.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls could cause our investors to lose confidence and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we maintain internal control over financial reporting that meets applicable standards. We may err in the design or operation of our controls, and all internal control systems, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because there are inherent limitations in all control systems, there can be no absolute assurance that all control issues have been or will be detected. If we are unable, or are perceived as unable, to produce reliable financial reports due to internal control deficiencies, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information and operating results, which could result in a negative market reaction.

3237

Funds invested in auction rate securities may not be liquid or accessible for in excess of 12 months, and our auction rate securities may experience further fair value adjustments or other-than-temporary declines in value, which would adversely affect our financial condition, cash flow and reported earnings.

Our long-term investment portfolio is invested in auction rate securities, or ARS. Beginning in February 2008, negative conditions in the credit and capital markets resulted in failed auctions of our ARS. The ratings on some of the ARS in our portfolio have been downgraded, and there may be further deterioration in creditworthiness in the future. We reevaluate the fair value of these securities on a quarterly basis. See Note E – “Long-Term Investments” in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. If uncertainties in the credit and capital markets continue, these markets deteriorate further or we experience further deterioration in creditworthiness on any investments in our portfolio, funds associated with these securities may not be liquid or available to fund current operations for in excess of 12 months. This could result in further fair value adjustments or other-than-temporary impairments in the carrying value of our investments, which would negatively affect our financial condition, cash flow and reported earnings.

Our commercial credit facility subjects us to operating restrictions and risks of default.

On August 26, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, as Administrative Agent, providing for a senior secured revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $125 million. This credit facility is subject to certain financial ratio and other covenants that could restrict our ability to conduct business as we might otherwise deem to be in our best interests, and breach of these covenants could cause any indebtedness under the ~~debt~~credit facility to become immediately due. Depending on borrowing levels in such an event, our liquid assets might not be sufficient to repay in full the debt outstanding under the credit facility. Such an acceleration also would expose us to the risk of liquidation of collateral assets at unfavorable prices.

Inability to obtain other financing could limit our ability to conduct necessary development activities and make strategic investments.

Although we believe at this time that our available cash and cash equivalents, the cash we anticipate generating from operations, and our available line of credit under our credit facility will be adequate to meet our foreseeable needs, we could incur significant expenses or shortfalls in anticipated cash generated as a result of unanticipated events in our business or competitive, regulatory, or other changes in our market. As a result, we may in the future need to obtain other financing. The availability of such financing may be limited by the tightening of the global credit markets. In addition, the commitment under our credit facility expires on August 26, 2011. Our ability to renew such credit facility or to enter into a new credit facility to replace the existing facility could be impaired if market conditions experienced in 2008 and 2009 continue or worsen. In addition, if credit is available, lenders may seek more restrictive lending provisions and higher interest rates that may reduce our borrowing capacity and increase our costs.

If other financing is not available on acceptable terms, or at all, we may not be able to respond adequately to these changes or maintain our business, which could adversely affect our operating results and the market price of our common stock. Alternatively, we may be forced to obtain additional financing by selling equity, and this could be dilutive to our existing stockholders.

~~RISKS~~Risks OFOf ~~LIABILITY~~Liability TOTo ~~THIRD~~Third ~~PARTIES~~Parties

Our software and content are used by clinicians in the course of treating patients. If our software fails to provide accurate and timely information or is associated with faulty clinical decisions or treatment, clients, clinicians or their patients could assert claims against us that could result in substantial cost to us, harm our reputation in the industry and cause demand for our software to decline.

We provide software and content that provides information and tools for use in clinical decision-making, provides access to patient medical histories and assists in creating patient treatment plans. If our software fails to provide accurate and timely information, or if our content or any other element of our software is associated with faulty clinical decisions or treatment, we could have exposure to claims by clients, clinicians or their patients. The assertion of such claims, whether or not valid, and ensuing litigation, regardless of its outcome, could result in substantial cost to us, divert management’s attention from operations and decrease market acceptance of our software. We attempt to limit by contract our liability for damages and to require that our clients assume responsibility for medical care and approve all system rules and protocols. Despite these precautions, the allocations of responsibility and limitations of liability set forth in our contracts may not be enforceable, may not be binding upon our client’s patients, or may not otherwise protect us from liability for damages. We maintain general liability and errors and omissions insurance coverage, but this coverage may not continue to be available on acceptable terms or may not be available in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims against us. In addition, the insurer might disclaim coverage as to any future claim. One or more large claims could exceed our available insurance coverage.

3338

Complex software such as ours may contain errors or failures that are not detected until after the software is introduced or updates and new versions are released. It is challenging for us to envision and test our software for all potential problems because it is difficult to simulate the wide variety of computing environments, medical circumstances or treatment methodologies that our clients may deploy or rely upon. Despite extensive testing by us and clients, from time to time we have discovered defects or errors in our software, and additional defects or errors can be expected to appear in the future.

Defects and errors that are not timely detected and remedied could expose us to risk of liability to clients, clinicians and their patients and cause delays in software introductions and shipments, result in increased costs and diversion of development resources, require design modifications or decrease market acceptance or client satisfaction with our software.

Our software and software provided by third parties that we include in our offering could infringe third-party intellectual property rights, exposing us to costs that could be significant.

Infringement or invalidity claims or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims could be asserted or prosecuted against us based upon design or use of software we provide to clients, including software we develop as well as software provided to us by third parties. Regardless of the validity of any claims, defending against these claims could result in significant costs and diversion of our resources, and vendor indemnity might not be available. The assertion of infringement claims could result in injunctions preventing us from distributing our software, or require us to obtain a license to the disputed intellectual property rights, which might not be available on reasonable terms or at all. We might also be required to indemnify our clients at significant expense.

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~OUR~~Our ~~STRATEGIC~~Strategic ~~RELATIONSHIPS~~Relationships ~~AND~~And ~~INITIATIVES~~Initiatives

Our software strategy is dependent on the continued development and support by Microsoft of its .NET Framework and other technologies.

Our software strategy is substantially dependent upon Microsoft’s .NET Framework and other Microsoft technologies. If Microsoft were to cease actively supporting .NET or other technologies that we use, fail to update and enhance them to keep pace with changing industry standards, encounter technical difficulties in the continuing development of these technologies or make them unavailable to us, we could be required to invest significant resources in re-engineering our software. This could lead to lost or delayed sales, loss of functionality, increased client costs associated with platform changes, and unanticipated development expenses.

We depend on licenses from third parties for rights to some of the technology we use, and if we are unable to continue these relationships and maintain our rights to this technology, our business could suffer.

We depend upon licenses for some of the technology used in our software from a number of third-party vendors. Most of these licenses expire within one to five years, can be renewed only by mutual consent and may be terminated if we breach the terms of the license and fail to cure the breach within a specified period of time. We may not be able to continue using the technology made available to us under these licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all. As a result, we may have to discontinue, delay or reduce software sales until we obtain equivalent technology, which could hurt our business. Most of our third-party licenses are non-exclusive. Our competitors may obtain the right to use any of the technology covered by these licenses and use the technology to compete directly with us. In addition, if our vendors choose to discontinue support of the licensed technology in the future or are unsuccessful in their continued research and development efforts, particularly with regard to Microsoft, we may not be able to modify or adapt our own software.

Our software offering often includes modules provided by third parties, and if these third parties do not meet their commitments, our relationships with our clients could be impaired.

Some of the software modules we offer to clients are provided by third parties. We often rely upon these third parties to produce software that meets our clients’ needs and to implement and maintain that software. If these third parties are unable or unwilling to fulfill their responsibilities, our relationships with affected clients could be impaired, and we could be responsible to clients for the failures. We might not be able to recover from these third parties for any or all of the costs we incur as a result of their failures.

3439

Any acquisitions we undertake may be disruptive to our business and could have an adverse effect on our future operations and the market price of our common stock.

An important element of our business strategy has been expansion through acquisitions and while there is no assurance that we will identify and complete any future acquisitions, any acquisitions would involve a number of risks, including the following:

•

The anticipated benefits from the acquisition may not be achieved, including as a result of loss of customers or personnel of the target.

•

The identification, acquisition and integration of acquired businesses require substantial attention from management. The diversion of management’s attention and any difficulties encountered in the transition process could hurt our business.

•

The identification, acquisition and integration of acquired businesses requires significant investment, including to harmonize product and service offerings, expand management capabilities and market presence, and improve or increase development efforts and software features and functions.

•

In future acquisitions, we could issue additional shares of our common stock, incur additional indebtedness or pay consideration in excess of book value, which could dilute future earnings.

•

Acquisitions also expose us to the risk of assumed known and unknown liabilities.

•

New business acquisitions generate significant intangible assets that result in substantial related amortization charges and possible impairments.

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~INDUSTRY~~Industry ~~REGULATION~~Regulation

Potential regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of our software and content as medical devices could impose increased costs, delay the introduction of new software and hurt our business.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, may become increasingly active in regulating computer software or content intended for use in the healthcare setting. The FDA has increasingly focused on the regulation of computer software and computer-assisted products as medical devices under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or the FDC Act. If the FDA chooses to regulate any of our software, or third -party software that we resell, as medical devices, it could impose extensive requirements upon us, including requiring us to:

•

Seek FDA clearance of pre-market notification submission demonstrating substantial equivalence to a device already legally marketed, or to obtain FDA approval of a pre-market approval application establishing the safety and effectiveness of the software;

•

Comply with rigorous regulations governing the pre-clinical and clinical testing, manufacture, distribution, labeling and promotion of medical devices; and/or

•

Comply with the FDC Act regarding general controls, including establishment registration, device listing, compliance with good manufacturing practices, reporting of specified device malfunctions and adverse device events.

Other countries in which we do business have agencies similar to the FDA that may also impose regulations affecting our software. If we fail to comply with applicable requirements, the FDA or foreign agencies could respond by imposing fines, injunctions or civil penalties, requiring recalls or software corrections, suspending production, refusing to grant pre-market clearance or approval of software, withdrawing clearances and approvals, and initiating criminal prosecution. Any FDA or foreign agency policy governing computer products or content may increase the cost and time to market of new or existing software or may prevent us from marketing our software.

Changes in federal and state regulations relating to patient data could increase our compliance costs, depress the demand for our software and impose significant software redesign costs on us.

Clients use our systems to store and transmit highly confidential patient health information and data. State and federal laws and regulations and their foreign equivalents govern the collection, security, use, transmission and other disclosures of health information. These laws and regulations may change rapidly and may be unclear, or difficult or costly to apply.

3540

Federal regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, and related laws and regulations, impose national health data standards on healthcare providers that conduct electronic health transactions, healthcare clearinghouses that convert health data between HIPAA-compliant and non-compliant formats, and health plans and entities providing certain services to these organizations. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or ARRA, includes provisions specifying additional HIPAA requirements for such organizations, including more detailed penalty and enforcement provisions and provisions specifying additional data restrictions, and disclosure and reporting requirements. The HIPAA standards, as modified by ARRA, require, among other things, transaction formats and code sets for electronic health transactions; protect individual privacy by limiting the uses and disclosures of individually identifiable health information; require covered entities to implement administrative, physical and technological safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, availability and security of individually identifiable health information in electronic form; and require notification to individuals in the event of a security breach with respect to unsecured protected health information. Most of our clients are covered by these regulations and require that our software and services adhere to HIPAA standards. In addition, ARRA includes provisions that apply several of HIPAA’s security and privacy requirements to us in our role as a “business associate” to certain of the organizations mentioned above, and business associates will now also be subject to certain penalties and enforcement proceedings for violations of applicable HIPAA standards. Any failure or perception of failure of our software or services to meet HIPAA standards and related regulations could expose us to certain notification, penalty and/or enforcement risks and could adversely affect demand for our software and services and force us to expend significant capital, research and development and other resources to modify our software or services to address the privacy and security requirements of our clients.

States and foreign jurisdictions in which we or our clients operate have adopted, or may adopt, privacy standards that are similar to or more stringent than the federal HIPAA privacy standards. This may lead to different restrictions for handling individually identifiable health information. As a result, our clients may demand, and we may be required to provide information technology solutions and services that are adaptable to reflect different and changing regulatory requirements, which could increase our development costs. In the future, federal, state or foreign governmental or regulatory authorities or industry bodies may impose new data security standards or additional restrictions on the collection, use, transmission and other disclosures of health information. We cannot predict the potential impact that these future rules may have on our business. However, the demand for our software and services may decrease if we are not able to develop and offer software and services that can address the regulatory challenges and compliance obligations facing us and our clients.

~~RISKS~~Risks ~~RELATED~~Related TOTo ~~OUR~~Our ~~EQUITY~~Equity ~~STRUCTURE~~Structure

Provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit potential acquisition bids that stockholders may believe are desirable, and the market price of our common stock may be lower as a result.

Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board of directors can fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred stock without any further vote or action by our stockholders. The issuance of shares of preferred stock may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition of our company. The issuance of preferred stock may result in the loss of voting control to other stockholders. We have no current plans to issue any shares of preferred stock but in the future we could implement a stockholder rights plan or make other uses of preferred stock that could inhibit a potential acquisition of the company.

Our charter documents contain additional anti-takeover devices, including:

•

Only one of the three classes of directors is elected each year;

•

The ability of our stockholders to remove directors without cause is limited;

•

Our stockholders are not allowed to act by written consent;

•

Our stockholders are not allowed to call a special meeting of stockholders; and

•

Advance notice must be given to nominate directors or submit proposals for consideration at stockholders meetings.

3641

We are also subject to provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits us from engaging in any business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years from the date the person became an interested stockholder, unless certain conditions are met. These provisions make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to acquire us without negotiation and may apply even if some of our stockholders consider the proposed transaction beneficial to them. For example, these provisions might discourage a potential acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition proposal or tender offer is at a premium over the then current market price for our common stock. These provisions could also limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGER

Allscripts may be unable to successfully integrate Eclipsys’ business with its business and realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger.

The success of the Merger will depend, in part, on the ability to realize the anticipated synergies, growth opportunities and cost savings from integrating Eclipsys’ business with Allscripts’ business. The integration of two independent companies is a complex, costly and time-consuming process and involves numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of operations, services, products and personnel, the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, the entry into markets in which Allscripts or Eclipsys have little or no direct prior experience, the potential loss of Allscripts’ key employees or Eclipsys’ key employees, and the potential inability to maintain the goodwill of existing clients. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among other factors:

•

managing a significantly larger company;

•

the possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the integration process;

•

integrating two unique business cultures, which may prove to be incompatible;

•

creating uniform standards, controls, procedures, policies and information systems and minimizing the costs associated with such matters;

•

integrating information, purchasing, accounting, finance, sales, billing, payroll and regulatory compliance systems;

•

preserving customer, supplier, research and development, distribution, marketing, promotion and other important relationships;

•

commercializing products under development and increasing revenues from existing marketed products;

•

coordinating geographically separated organizations, systems and facilities, including complexities associated with managing the combined businesses with separate locations;

•

combining the sales force territories and competencies associated with the sale of products and services presently sold or provided by Allscripts or Eclipsys;

•

integrating personnel from different companies while maintaining focus on providing consistent, high-quality products and customer service and attractive to prospective customers;

•

integrating complex technologies, solutions and products from different companies in a manner that is seamless to customers;

•

unforeseen expenses or delays associated with the Merger; and

•

performance shortfalls at one or both of the companies as a result of the diversion of management’s attention to the Merger.

If management is unable to combine successfully Allscripts’ business and the business of Eclipsys in a manner that permits the combined company to achieve the cost savings and operating synergies anticipated to result from the Merger, such anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. Any of the above difficulties could adversely affect the combined company’s ability to maintain relationships with customers, partners, suppliers and employees or the combined company’s ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger, or could reduce the combined company’s earnings or otherwise adversely affect the business and financial results of the combined company.

If Eclipsys’ former stockholders immediately sell Allscripts common stock received in the Merger, they could cause Allscripts’ common stock price to decline.

Allscripts’ common stock to be issued to stockholders of Eclipsys pursuant to the Merger Agreement will be registered under the federal securities laws. As a result, those shares will be immediately available for resale in the public market. The number of shares of Allscripts common stock to be issued to Eclipsys’ former stockholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and immediately available for resale, will equal approximately 37% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding, after giving effect

to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement, including the Share Repurchase, the Secondary Offering and the Contingent Share Repurchase. Eclipsys’ former stockholders may sell any or all of the stock they receive immediately after the Merger. If Eclipsys’ former stockholders or the other holders of Allscripts common stock sell significant amounts of our common stock immediately after the Merger is completed, the market price of Allscripts common stock could decline. These sales may also make it more difficult for Allscripts to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate to raise funds through future offerings of common stock.

To be successful, the combined company must retain and motivate key employees, and failure to do so could seriously harm the combined company.

To be successful, the combined company must retain and motivate executives and other key employees. Allscripts’ and Eclipsys’ employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company until or after strategies for the combined company are announced or executed. These circumstances may adversely affect the combined company’s ability to retain key personnel. Allscripts and Eclipsys have implemented retention plans to retain and motivate executives and other key employees which will increase the cost of the Merger. The combined company also must continue to motivate employees and keep them focused on the strategies and goals of the combined company, which effort may be adversely affected as a result of the uncertainty and difficulties with integrating Allscripts’ business and Eclipsys’ business. If the combined company is unable to retain executives and other key employees, the roles and responsibilities of such executive officers and employees will need to be filled either by existing or new officers and employees, which may require the combined company to devote time and resources to identifying, hiring and integrating replacements for the departed executives that could otherwise be used to integrate Allscripts’ business and Eclipsys’ business or otherwise pursue business opportunities.

If the combined company is unable to manage its growth, its business and financial results could suffer.

The combined company’s future financial results will depend in part on its ability to profitably manage its core businesses, including any growth that the combined company may be able to achieve. Over the past several years, both Allscripts and Eclipsys have engaged in the identification of, and competition for, growth and expansion opportunities. In order to achieve those initiatives, the combined company will need to, among other things, recruit, train, retain and effectively manage employees and expand its operations and financial control systems. If the combined company is unable to manage its businesses effectively and profitably, its business and financial results could suffer.

Provisions of the Merger Agreement may deter alternative business combinations and could negatively impact Allscripts’ stock price if the Merger Agreement is terminated in certain circumstances.

Restrictions in the Merger Agreement prohibit Allscripts and Eclipsys from soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a merger or business combination with any other party, including a proposal that might be advantageous to Allscripts’ stockholders or Eclipsys’ stockholders when compared to the terms and conditions of the Merger.

In addition, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, Allscripts or Eclipsys may be required in specified circumstances to pay the transaction expenses of the other up to $5 million or to pay a termination fee of $17.7 million or $40 million to the other. If the Merger Agreement is terminated by either Allscripts or Eclipsys in circumstances that obligate it to pay the other its transaction expenses or the termination fee, the trading price of the payor’s stock may decline.

These provisions may deter third parties from proposing or pursuing alternative business combinations that might result in greater value to stockholders of Allscripts or Eclipsys than the Merger.

Certain executive officers of Allscripts and Eclipsys have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of stockholders.

Certain of the executive officers of Allscripts and Eclipsys have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, interests of the stockholders of Allscripts and Eclipsys, respectively. Pursuant to retention plans adopted by the boards of directors of Allscripts and Eclipsys, certain employees of each company, including executive officers, will be entitled to receive retention payments subject to certain conditions.

The Merger may result in substantial goodwill for the combined company. If the combined company’s goodwill becomes impaired, then the profits of the combined company may be significantly reduced or eliminated and stockholders’ equity may be reduced.

The actual amount of goodwill recorded will depend in part on the market value of Allscripts common stock as of the date on which the Merger is completed and the appropriate allocation of purchase price, which may be impacted by a number of factors, including changes in the net assets acquired and changes in the fair values of the net assets acquired. On at least an annual basis, Allscripts assessed whether there has been an impairment in the value of goodwill. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its

estimated fair value, impairment is deemed to have occurred and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. Under GAAP, this would result in a charge to the combined company’s operating earnings. Accordingly, any determination requiring the write-off of a significant portion of goodwill recorded in connection with the Merger would negatively affect the combined company’s results of operations.

Allscripts and Eclipsys will incur significant costs in connection with the Merger.

Allscripts and Eclipsys will incur substantial expenses related to the Merger, and in the case of Allscripts, the Coniston Transactions. It is currently estimated that Allscripts will incur approximately $55.6 million in transactional expenses, and Eclipsys will incur approximately $15 million in transactional expenses (excluding severance expenses and other costs of pursuing Merger synergies).

If the Coniston Transactions are not completed, then the Merger will not be completed.

Allscripts’ obligation to complete the Merger is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the completion of the Coniston Transactions. Completion of the Coniston Transactions, in turn, is subject to certain conditions, including (i) approval of the Coniston Transactions by the shareholders of Misys, (ii) the sale of no fewer than 36 million shares of Allscripts common stock in the Secondary Offering, or 25 million shares if Allscripts’ stockholders approve the issuance of Allscripts common stock in connection with the Merger and Eclipsys stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement, at a price to the public of no less than $16.50 per share, and (iii) completion of the Share Repurchase, which is contingent upon completion of the financing contemplated by the Commitment Letter. Accordingly, if any of these conditions is not satisfied or waived, the Coniston Transactions will not be completed and, as a result, the Merger will not be completed. In addition, the Framework Agreement provides for certain termination rights for both Allscripts and Misys, including the right of either party to terminate the Framework Agreement if the closing of the Coniston Transactions has not been completed on or prior to December 9, 2010. If the Framework Agreement is terminated prior to the completion of the Coniston Transactions, the Merger will not be completed.

If the Merger is completed, the combined company will incur significant additional expenses in connection with the integration of the two businesses.

If the Merger is completed, the combined company expects to incur significant additional expenses in connection with the integration of the two businesses, including integrating personnel, geographically diverse operations, information technology systems, accounting systems, customers, and strategic partners of each company and implementing consistent standards, policies, and procedures, and may be subject to possibly material write downs in assets and charges to earnings, which are expected to include severance pay and other costs.

We will be subject to various uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending that could adversely affect our financial results.

Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on employees, customers, potential customers, partners and suppliers may have an adverse effect on us. These uncertainties may impair our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Merger is completed and for a period of time thereafter, and could cause existing customers, partners and suppliers and others that currently have business relationships with us to seek to change their business relationships with us. Additionally, these uncertainties could cause potential clients to defer decisions or purchases, or to seek products and services from our competitors.

Employee retention and recruitment may be particularly challenging prior to completion of the Merger, as employees and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company.

The pursuit of the Merger and the preparation for the integration may place a significant burden on management and internal resources. Any significant diversion of management attention away from ongoing business and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process could affect our financial results.

In addition, the Merger Agreement restricts us, without Allscripts’ consent, from making certain acquisitions and dispositions and taking other specified actions related to the operation of our businesses while the Merger is pending. These restrictions may prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities and making other changes to our business prior to completion of the Merger or termination of the Merger Agreement.

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact our stock price and our future business and financial results.

If the Merger is not completed, our ongoing business may be adversely affected and we will be subject to several risks, including the following:

•

being required, under certain circumstances under the Merger Agreement, to pay a termination fee of approximately $17.7 million or $40 million to Allscripts or reimburse Allscripts’ out-of-pocket transaction expenses of up to $5 million depending on the timing and reasons for termination;

•

having to pay costs and expenses relating to the Merger and related transactions;

•

the attention of our management will have been diverted to the Merger instead of our operations and pursuit of other opportunities that could have been beneficial to us; and

•

customer perception may be negatively impacted which could affect our ability to compete for, or to win, new and renewal business in the marketplace.

Pending litigation could result in an injunction preventing completion of the Merger, the payment of damages if the Merger is completed and/or may adversely affect the combined company’s business, financial condition or results of operations following the Merger.

In connection with the Merger, purported stockholders of Eclipsys have filed putative stockholder class action lawsuits against Eclipsys and its directors, Allscripts and Arsenal Merger Corp. Among other remedies, the plaintiffs seek to enjoin the Merger. The outcome of any such litigation is inherently uncertain. Each company may incur substantial costs and expenses to defend against the lawsuit. If a dismissal is not granted or a settlement is not reached, these lawsuits could prevent or delay completion of the Merger. The outcome may adversely affect the combined company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. For additional information about these lawsuits, see Note K – Contingencies to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

The combined company will have to develop and rely on its own resources and personnel to operate the business.

Allscripts is currently a party to a Shared Services Agreement with Misys pursuant to which Misys provides Allscripts with certain services and personnel to support its business. Upon the consummation of the Coniston Transactions, the Shared Services Agreement will be terminated and Allscripts will enter into a Transition Services Agreement with Misys pursuant to which Misys will continue to provide certain services and personnel to the combined company to support its business. Beginning approximately six months after the date of the Transition Services Agreement with respect to certain services, the services formerly provided by Misys will need to be continued by either Allscripts’ existing or new employees, which may require the combined company to devote time and resources to identifying, hiring and integrating individuals to perform the services formerly provided by Misys pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement.

The combined company’s common stock may be affected by factors different from those affecting the price of our common stock.

On completion of the Merger, holders of Eclipsys common stock will become Allscripts stockholders. Allscripts’ business is different from Eclipsys, and will change as a result of the Merger, and the results of operations of Allscripts after the Merger as well as the price of the combined company’s common stock may be affected by factors different than those factors affecting Eclipsys and Allscripts as independent stand-alone entities. The combined company will face additional risks and uncertainties not otherwise facing each independent company in the Merger.

If the Merger is completed, provisions of the combined company’s charter documents and Delaware law may delay or inhibit potential acquisition bids that stockholders may believe are desirable, and the market price of our common stock may be lower as a result.

If the Merger is completed, the combined company’s charter documents will provide that the board of directors will have the authority to issue up to 1 million shares of preferred stock. The board of directors will be able to fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred stock without any further vote or action by Allscripts’ stockholders, and the issuance of shares of preferred stock may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition of Allscripts.

In addition, the combined company’s charter documents will include an election to be governed by Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will prohibit Allscripts from engaging in any business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years from the date the person became an interested stockholder, unless certain conditions are met. These provisions will make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to acquire Allscripts without negotiation and may apply even if some of Allscripts’ stockholders consider the proposed transaction beneficial to them. These provisions could also limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of Allscripts’ common stock.

The combined company’s charter documents will also contain provisions that may delay or inhibit potential acquisition bids, including provisions that:

•

Allscripts’ stockholders are not allowed to act by written consent; and

•

Allscripts’ stockholders are not allowed to call a special meeting of stockholders.

RISKS RELATED TO THE CONISTON TRANSACTIONS

The sale of Allscripts common stock by Misys could cause Allscripts’ common stock price to decline.

Allscripts has agreed to facilitate the sale of at least 36 million shares of its common stock held by one or more subsidiaries of Misys in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement, which requirement will be reduced to 25 million shares if Allscripts’ stockholders approve the issuance of Allscripts common stock in connection with the Merger and Eclipsys stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement. The number of shares to be offered by such subsidiaries of Misys will equal approximately 24.6% of Allscripts’ outstanding common stock at the time of such sale if they sell 36 million shares, or 17.1% if they sell 25 million shares. As a result of such offering, the market price for Allscripts’ common stock could decline and it may make it more difficult for Allscripts to sell equity securities at a time and at a price Allscripts deems appropriate. In addition, any shares of Allscripts’ common stock held by Misys and its subsidiaries after the completion of the Coniston Transactions may be sold following the expiration of the lock-up agreements entered into in connection with the Secondary Offering, which could result in further declines of the market price for Allscripts’ common stock. Under the Registration Rights Agreement between Allscripts, Misys and certain Misys subsidiaries, for as long as Misys owns at least 5% of the outstanding shares of Allscripts’ common stock, Misys may require Allscripts to file a registration statement under the federal securities laws registering the sale of all or a portion of the shares of Allscripts common stock owned by Misys that are not otherwise freely tradable, and Misys may, for a period of three years, participate in any registration statement proposed to be effected by Allscripts, subject to certain limitations.

The additional indebtedness incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement will decrease business flexibility and increase borrowing costs.

In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement, Allscripts will increase its indebtedness by approximately $570 million, and will have indebtedness that will be substantially greater than Allscripts’ indebtedness prior to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement. The covenants in such indebtedness and the increased indebtedness and higher debt-to-equity ratio in comparison to Allscripts’ debt-to-equity ratio on a recent historical basis could have the effect, among other things, of:

•

requiring a substantial portion of the combined company’s cash flow from operations to be used for payments on the combined company’s debt, reducing the availability of cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

•

increasing vulnerability to adverse general economic and industry conditions;

•

limiting flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in business and the industry;

•

placing the combined company at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt; and

•

limiting the ability to borrow additional funds on terms that are satisfactory or at all.

Newco (a Misys subsidiary holding Allscripts shares) may be liable for significant potential contingent tax liabilities arising out of the Coniston Transactions and certain related transactions, or out of prior activities of Newco unrelated to those transactions.

Newco might be subject to significant taxes, which are referred to as Transaction Taxes, arising out of the Coniston Transactions and certain related restructuring transactions, which are referred to collectively as the Misys Transactions. In particular, the Exchange or other Misys Transactions might result in recognition of the built-in gain inherent in Allscripts shares of common stock held by Newco, which is significant. At the time of the Exchange, Newco will hold approximately 61.3 million shares of Allscripts common stock. Pursuant to the Framework Agreement, Misys has agreed to indemnify Allscripts against any Transaction Taxes imposed on Newco, and Misys is required to provide a bank guarantee in the amount of $168 million, which is referred to as the PLR Bank Guarantee, to support that indemnification obligation.

Misys is seeking a letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, which is referred to as the IRS, which, if obtained, is expected to confirm that the Misys Transactions will not result in the recognition of the built-in gain inherent in Allscripts shares of common stock held by Newco, and may address other tax issues related to the Misys Transactions. If a favorable letter ruling is received, the PLR Bank Guarantee will be terminated. No assurances can be given that a favorable letter ruling will be received, as the IRS might decline to issue a favorable letter ruling. At the time of the closing of the Coniston Transactions it likely will not be known whether a favorable letter ruling will be issued. If a favorable letter ruling were not issued, in a subsequent IRS audit of the Misys Transactions the IRS might successfully assert that significant taxes, penalties and interest are payable by Newco. The amount of the PLR Bank Guarantee might be insufficient to fully cover Misys’ resulting indemnification obligation. Furthermore, although not expected, there could be circumstances in which the PLR Bank Guarantee would be reduced or terminated prior to the extinguishment of the resulting tax liabilities. The ability to rely on any favorable letter ruling depends on the accuracy and completeness of the information submitted to the IRS, which will be primarily determined by Misys. As a result, no assurances can be given that Allscripts’ ability to rely on a favorable letter ruling could not be challenged, in which case Allscripts would be required to rely on Misys’ indemnification obligation without the benefit of the PLR Bank Guarantee.

Additionally, while the letter ruling is expected to address the material tax issues related to the Misys Transactions, all issues may not be addressed.

KPMG LLP, Allscripts’ tax advisor, has delivered an opinion to Allscripts concluding, among other things, that, based on relevant representations and assumptions, the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement, including the Exchange and the other Misys Transactions, will not result in the recognition of the built-in gain inherent in Allscripts stock held by Newco. If the representations or assumptions on which such opinion is based are inaccurate or incomplete, the conclusions reached in the opinion may be incorrect. Furthermore, such opinion is not binding on the IRS or any court, and the IRS or the courts may not agree with the conclusions reached in the opinion. The opinion will not preclude the IRS from declining to issue a favorable letter ruling nor will it preclude the IRS from successfully asserting that significant taxes, penalties and interest are payable by Newco as a result of the Misys Transactions or otherwise.

Pursuant to the Framework Agreement, Misys has also agreed to indemnify Allscripts against any contingent tax liability of Newco other than Transaction Taxes, such as taxes imposed as a result of prior activities of Newco, which are referred to as Historic Taxes, and Misys is required to provide an additional bank guarantee in the amount of $45 million, which is referred to as the Historic Bank Guarantee, to support that indemnification obligation. The amount of the Historic Bank Guarantee might be insufficient to fully cover Historic Taxes that might be imposed. Furthermore, although not expected, there could be circumstances in which the Historic Bank Guarantee is reduced or terminated prior to the extinguishment of the resulting tax liabilities.

Misys also has agreed to indemnify Allscripts from taxes imposed on Allscripts as a result of the Exchange and from taxes imposed on Allscripts relating to certain withholding taxes, including any liability for failing to withhold certain taxes. Those indemnification obligations are not supported by any bank guarantees.

If Allscripts is unable to finance the repurchase of shares from Misys, the Merger will not be completed.

Allscripts intends to finance the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement with debt financing, existing cash balances and cash flow from operations. To this end, and to provide for ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes after the Merger, Allscripts has received commitments from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, UBS Loan Finance LLC and certain of their affiliates for a $570 million senior secured term loan facility and a $150 million senior secured revolving facility, each of which is expected to close upon the closing of the Coniston Transactions. The Commitment Letter includes customary conditions to funding, including the completion of definitive documentation, the absence of a material adverse change in Allscripts and its subsidiaries’ business, assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise), financial condition or results of operations consistent with the definition in the Merger Agreement, the absence of material modification to the Framework Agreement and related documentation unless approved by the initial arrangers of the financing, the delivery of financial information and other customary closing deliveries, the receipt of corporate credit ratings from Moody’s and S&P, the perfection of liens, Allscripts’ solvency and the solvency of its subsidiaries after giving effect to the Coniston Transactions (other than the Merger) and a pro forma ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA for Allscripts and its subsidiaries not in excess of 4.0 to 1.0 (giving effect to the Merger on a pro forma basis to the extent the Merger will close substantially simultaneously with the Coniston Transactions). If the financing described in the Commitment Letter is not available on the terms set forth in the Commitment Letter, other financing may not be available on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all. If other financing becomes necessary and Allscripts is unable to secure such additional financing, the Coniston Transactions will not be completed and, as a result, the Merger will not be completed.

RISKS RELATED TO ALLSCRIPTS’ BUSINESS

If physicians and hospitals do not accept Allscripts’ products and services, or delay in deciding whether to purchase its products and services, its business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Allscripts’ business model depends on its ability to sell its products and services. Acceptance of Allscripts’ products and services requires physicians and hospitals to adopt different behavior patterns and new methods of conducting business and exchanging information. Allscripts cannot provide assurance that physicians and hospitals will integrate its products and services into their workflow or that participants in the healthcare market will accept its products and services as a replacement for traditional methods of conducting healthcare transactions. Achieving market acceptance for Allscripts’ products and services will require substantial sales and marketing efforts and the expenditure of significant financial and other resources to create awareness and demand by participants in the healthcare industry. If Allscripts fails to achieve broad acceptance of their products and services by physicians, hospitals and other healthcare industry participants or if Allscripts fails to position its services as a preferred method for information management and healthcare delivery, Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Allscripts may not see the benefits of government programs initiated to accelerate the adoption and utilization of health information technology and to counter the effects of the current economic situation.

While government programs initiated to improve the efficiency within the healthcare sector and counter the effects of the current economic situation include expenditures to stimulate business and accelerate the adoption and utilization of healthcare technology, Allscripts cannot provide assurance that it will receive any of those funds. For example, the passage of the HITECH Act under the ARRA authorizes approximately $30 billion in expenditures, including discretionary funding, to further adoption of electronic health records. Although Allscripts believes that its service offerings will meet the requirements of the HITECH Act in order for Allscripts clients to qualify for financial incentives for implementing and using Allscripts’ services, there can be no certainty that any of the planned financial incentives, if made, will be made in regard to Allscripts services. Allscripts also cannot predict the speed at which physicians will adopt electronic health record systems in response to such government incentives, whether physicians will select Allscripts’ products and services or whether physicians will implement an electronic health record system at all. Any delay in the purchase and implementation of electronic health records systems by physicians in response to government programs, or the failure of physicians to purchase an electronic health record system, could have an adverse effect on Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Allscripts’ failure to compete successfully could cause its revenue or market share to decline.

The market for Allscripts’ products and services is intensely competitive and is characterized by rapidly evolving technology and product standards, user needs and the frequent introduction of new products and services. Some of Allscripts’ competitors may be more established, benefit from greater name recognition and have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than Allscripts. Moreover, Allscripts expects that competition will continue to increase as a result of consolidation in both the information technology and healthcare industries. If one or more of Allscripts’ competitors or potential competitors were to merge or partner with another of its competitors, the change in the competitive landscape could adversely affect Allscripts’ ability to compete effectively. Allscripts competes on the basis of several factors, including:

•

breadth and depth of services;

•

reputation;

•

reliability, accuracy and security;

•

client service;

•

price; and

•

industry expertise and experience.

Allscripts’ clinical solutions segment’s principal competitors include athenahealth Inc., Cerner Corporation, eClinicalWorks Inc., Epic Systems Corporation, Emdeon Business Services LLC, General Electric Company, Aprima Medical Software (formerly iMedica Corporation), McKesson Corporation, Quality Systems, Inc., Sage Software, Inc., The Trizetto Group, Inc., and Wellsoft Corporation.

Allscripts’ key competitors in the electronic data information source market include MedHost, Meditech, Picis and WellSoft. In the care management market, primary competitors include eDischarge, Maxsys Ltd., Meditech, Midas+ and ProviderLink.

There can be no assurance that Allscripts will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that the competitive pressures that Allscripts faces will not materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

It is difficult to predict the sales cycle and implementation schedule for Allscripts’ software solutions.

The duration of the sales cycle and implementation schedule for Allscripts’ software solutions depends on a number of factors, including the nature and size of the potential customer and the extent of the commitment being made by the potential customer, which is difficult to predict. Allscripts’ sales and marketing efforts with respect to hospitals and large health organizations generally involve a lengthy sales cycle due to these organizations’ complex decision-making processes. Additionally, in light of increased government involvement in healthcare, and related changes in the operating environment for healthcare organizations, Allscripts’ current and potential customers may react by curtailing or deferring investments, including those for Allscripts’ services. If potential customers take longer than Allscripts expects to decide whether to purchase Allscripts’ solutions, Allscripts’ selling expenses could increase and Allscripts’ revenues could decrease, which could harm Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations. If customers take longer than Allscripts expect to implement Allscripts’ solutions, Allscripts’ recognition of related revenue would be delayed, which would adversely affect Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Allscripts’ future success depends upon Allscripts’ ability to grow, and if Allscripts is unable to manage Allscripts’ growth effectively, Allscripts may incur unexpected expenses and be unable to meet Allscripts’ customers’ requirements.

Allscripts will need to expand its operations in order to successfully achieve market acceptance for its products and services. Allscripts cannot be certain that its systems, procedures, controls and existing space will be adequate to support expansion of its operations. Allscripts’ future operating results will depend on the ability of Allscripts’ officers and key employees to manage changing business conditions and to implement and improve Allscripts’ technical, administrative, financial control and reporting systems. Allscripts may not be able to expand and upgrade Allscripts’ systems and infrastructure to accommodate these increases. Difficulties in managing any future growth, including as a result of the Merger, could have a significant negative impact on Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations because Allscripts may incur unexpected expenses and be unable to meet Allscripts’ customers’ requirements.

Competition for Allscripts’ employees is intense, and Allscripts may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees it needs to support its business.

Allscripts’ ability to provide high-quality services to its clients depends in large part upon Allscripts’ employees’ experience and expertise. Allscripts must attract and retain highly qualified personnel with a deep understanding of the healthcare and health information technology industries. Allscripts competes with a number of companies for experienced personnel and many of these companies, including clients and competitors, have greater resources than Allscripts has and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, Allscripts invests significant time and expense in training its employees, which increases their value to clients and competitors who may seek to recruit them and increases the costs of replacing them. If Allscripts fails to retain its employees, the quality of Allscripts’ services could diminish and this could have a material adverse effect on Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

If Allscripts loses the services of its key personnel, Allscripts may be unable to replace them, and its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Allscripts’ success largely depends on the continued skills, experience, efforts and policies of Allscripts’ management and other key personnel and Allscripts’ ability to continue to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified employees. If one or more of Allscripts’ key employees leaves Allscripts’ employment, Allscripts will have to find a replacement with the combination of skills and attributes necessary to execute Allscripts’ strategy. Because competition for skilled employees is intense, and the process of finding qualified individuals can be lengthy and expensive, Allscripts believes that the loss of the services of key personnel could adversely affect Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations. Allscripts cannot provide assurance that it will continue to retain such personnel. Allscripts does not maintain key man insurance for any of Allscripts’ key employees.

If Allscripts is unable to successfully introduce new products or services or fail to keep pace with advances in technology, Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

The successful implementation of Allscripts’ business model depends on Allscripts’ ability to adapt to evolving technologies and industry standards and introduce new products and services. Allscripts cannot provide assurance that Allscripts will be able to introduce new products on schedule, or at all, or that such products will achieve market acceptance. Moreover, competitors may develop competitive products that could adversely affect Allscripts’ results of operations. A failure by Allscripts to introduce planned products or other new products or to introduce these products on schedule could have an adverse effect on Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

If Allscripts cannot adapt to changing technologies, Allscripts’ products and services may become obsolete, and its business could suffer. Because the health information technology market is characterized by rapid technological change, Allscripts may be unable to anticipate changes in Allscripts’ current and potential customers’ requirements that could make Allscripts’ existing technology obsolete. Allscripts’ success will depend, in part, on Allscripts’ ability to continue to enhance Allscripts’ existing products and services, develop new technology that addresses the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of Allscripts’ prospective customers, license leading technologies and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a timely and cost-effective basis. The development of Allscripts’ proprietary technology entails significant technical and business risks. Allscripts may not be successful in using new technologies effectively or adapting Allscripts’ proprietary technology to evolving customer requirements or emerging industry standards, and, as a result, Allscripts’ business could suffer.

Allscripts’ business depends in part on and will continue to depend in part on Allscripts’ ability to establish and maintain additional strategic relationships.

To be successful, Allscripts must continue to maintain Allscripts’ existing strategic relationships and establish additional strategic relationships with leaders in a number of healthcare and health information technology industry segments. This is critical to Allscripts’ success because Allscripts believes that these relationships contribute towards Allscripts’ ability to:

•

extend the reach of Allscripts’ products and services to a larger number of physicians and hospitals and to other participants in the healthcare industry;

•

develop and deploy new products and services;

•

further enhance the Allscripts brand; and

•

generate additional revenue and cash flows.

Entering into strategic relationships is complicated because strategic partners may decide to compete with Allscripts in some or all of Allscripts’ markets. In addition, Allscripts may not be able to maintain or establish relationships with key participants in the healthcare industry if Allscripts conducts business with their competitors. Allscripts depends, in part, on Allscripts’ strategic partners’ ability to generate increased acceptance and use of Allscripts’ products and services. If Allscripts loses any of these strategic relationships or fails to establish additional relationships, or if Allscripts’ strategic relationships fail to benefit Allscripts as expected, Allscripts may not be able to execute its business plan, and Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

Future acquisitions may result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of indebtedness and increased amortization expense.

Future acquisitions may result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities. In addition, future acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, the assumption of known and unknown liabilities, the write off of software development costs and the amortization of expenses related to intangible assets, all of which could have an adverse effect on Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations. Allscripts has taken, and, if an impairment occurs, could take, charges against earnings in connection with acquisitions.

If Allscripts’ products fail to perform properly due to errors or similar problems, Allscripts’ business could suffer.

Complex software, such as Allscripts, often contains defects or errors, some of which may remain undetected for a period of time. It is possible that such errors may be found after introduction of new software or enhancements to existing software. Allscripts continually introduces new solutions and enhancements to Allscripts’ solutions, and, despite testing by us, it is possible that errors might occur in Allscripts’ software. If Allscripts detects any errors before Allscripts introduces a solution, Allscripts might have to delay deployment for an extended period of time while Allscripts addresses the problem. If Allscripts does not discover software errors that affect Allscripts’ new or current solutions or enhancements until after they are deployed, Allscripts would need to provide enhancements to correct such errors. Errors in Allscripts’ software could result in:

•

harm to Allscripts’ reputation;

•

lost sales;

•

delays in commercial release;

•

product liability claims;

•

delays in or loss of market acceptance of Allscripts’ solutions;

•

license terminations or renegotiations; and

•

unexpected expenses and diversion of resources to remedy errors.

Furthermore, Allscripts’ customers might use Allscripts’ software together with products from other companies. As a result, when problems occur, it might be difficult to identify the source of the problem. Even when Allscripts’ software does not cause these problems, the existence of these errors might cause Allscripts to incur significant costs, divert the attention of Allscripts’ technical personnel from Allscripts’ solution development efforts, impact Allscripts’ reputation and cause significant customer relations problems.

Allscripts’ business depends on its intellectual property rights, and if Allscripts is unable to protect them, its competitive position may suffer.

Allscripts’ business plan is predicated on its proprietary systems and technology products. Accordingly, protecting Allscripts’ intellectual property rights is critical to its continued success and Allscripts’ ability to maintain Allscripts’ competitive position. Allscripts protects its proprietary rights through a combination of trademark, trade secret and copyright law, confidentiality agreements and technical measures. Allscripts generally does not have any patents on Allscripts’ technology. Allscripts generally enters into non-disclosure agreements with Allscripts’ employees and consultants and limits access to Allscripts’ trade secrets and technology. Allscripts cannot provide assurance that the steps it has taken will prevent misappropriation of Allscripts’ technology. Misappropriation of Allscripts’ intellectual property would have an adverse effect on Allscripts’ competitive position. In addition, Allscripts may have to engage in litigation in the future to enforce or protect its intellectual property rights or to defend against claims of invalidity, and Allscripts may incur substantial costs and the diversion of management’s time and attention as a result.

If Allscripts is deemed to infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties, Allscripts could incur unanticipated expense and be prevented from providing Allscripts’ products and services.

Allscripts is and may continue to be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as Allscripts’ applications’ functionality overlaps with competitive products. Allscripts does not believe that Allscripts has infringed or is infringing on any proprietary rights of third parties.

However, claims are occasionally asserted against Allscripts, and Allscripts cannot provide assurance that infringement claims will not be asserted against Allscripts in the future. Also, Allscripts cannot provide assurance that any such claims will be unsuccessful. Allscripts could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources defending any infringement claims. Furthermore, a party making a claim against Allscripts could secure a judgment awarding substantial damages, as well as injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block Allscripts’ ability to provide products or services. In addition, Allscripts cannot provide assurance that licenses for any intellectual property of third parties that might be required for its products or services will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

If Allscripts’ content and service providers fail to perform adequately, or to comply with laws, regulations or contractual covenants, its reputation and business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Allscripts depends on independent content and service providers for communications and information services and for many of the benefits Allscripts provides through its software applications and services, including the maintenance of managed care pharmacy guidelines, drug interaction reviews, the routing of transaction data to third-party payers and the hosting of Allscripts’ applications. Allscripts’ ability to rely on these services could be impaired as a result of the failure of such providers to comply with applicable laws, regulations and contractual covenants, or as a result of events affecting such providers, such as power loss, telecommunication failures, software or hardware errors, computer viruses and similar disruptive problems, fire, flood and natural disasters. Any such failure or event could adversely affect Allscripts’ relationships with customers and damage Allscripts’ reputation. This would adversely affect Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, Allscripts may have no means of replacing content or services on a timely basis or at all if they are inadequate or in the event of a service interruption or failure.

Allscripts also relies on independent content providers for the majority of the clinical, educational and other healthcare information that Allscripts provides. In addition, Allscripts depends on its content providers to deliver high quality content from reliable sources and to continually upgrade their content in response to demand and evolving healthcare industry trends. If these parties fail to develop and maintain high quality, attractive content, the value of Allscripts’ brand and Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations could be impaired.

Allscripts may be liable for use of content it provides.

Allscripts provides content for use by healthcare providers in treating patients. Third-party contractors provide Allscripts with most of this content. If this content is incorrect or incomplete, adverse consequences, including death, may occur and give rise to product liability and other claims against Allscripts. In addition, certain of Allscripts’ solutions provide applications that relate to patient clinical information, and a court or government agency may take the position that Allscripts’ delivery of health information directly, including through licensed practitioners, or delivery of information by a third-party site that a consumer accesses through Allscripts’ websites, exposes Allscripts to personal injury liability, or other liability for wrongful delivery or handling of healthcare services or erroneous health information. While Allscripts maintains product liability insurance coverage in an amount that Allscripts believes is sufficient for Allscripts’ business, Allscripts cannot provide assurance that this coverage will prove to be adequate or will continue to be available on acceptable terms, if at all. A claim brought against Allscripts that is uninsured or under-insured could harm Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations. Even unsuccessful claims could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources.

If Allscripts’ security is breached, it could be subject to liability, and customers could be deterred from using Allscripts’ services.

Allscripts’ business relies on electronic transmission of confidential patient and other information. Allscripts believes that any well-publicized compromise of Allscripts’ network security or a misappropriation of patient information or other data would adversely affect Allscripts’ reputation and would require Allscripts to devote significant financial and other resources to alleviate such problems. In addition, Allscripts’ existing or potential customers could be deterred from using Allscripts’ products and services, and Allscripts could be subject to possible liability and regulatory action. Allscripts could face financial loss, litigation and other liabilities to the extent that Allscripts’ activities or the activities of third-party contractors involve the storage and transmission of confidential information, such as patient records or credit information.

If Allscripts is unable to obtain additional financing for its future needs, its ability to respond to competitive pressures may be impaired and Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Allscripts cannot be certain that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If adequate financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, Allscripts’ ability to fund Allscripts’ expansion, take advantage of potential acquisition opportunities, develop or enhance services or products, or respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited.

If Allscripts is forced to reduce its prices, its business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

Allscripts may be subject to pricing pressures with respect to Allscripts’ future sales arising from various sources, including practices of managed care organizations, and government action affecting reimbursement under Medicare, Medicaid and other government health programs. Allscripts’ customers and the other entities with which Allscripts has a business relationship are affected by changes in statutes, regulations and limitations in governmental spending for Medicare, Medicaid and other programs. Recent government actions and future legislative and administrative changes could limit government spending for the Medicare and Medicaid programs, limit payments to hospitals and other providers, increase emphasis on competition, impose price controls and create other programs that potentially could have an adverse effect on Allscripts’ customers and the other entities with which Allscripts has a business relationship. If Allscripts’

pricing experiences significant downward pressure, its business will be less profitable and Allscripts’ results of operations would be adversely affected. In addition, because cash from sales funds some of Allscripts’ working capital requirements, reduced profitability could require Allscripts to raise additional capital sooner than Allscripts would otherwise need.

If Allscripts incurs costs exceeding its insurance coverage in lawsuits pending against it or that are brought against it in the future, it could adversely affect Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Allscripts is a defendant in lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. In the event Allscripts is found liable in any lawsuits filed against it, and if Allscripts’ insurance coverage were not available or inadequate to satisfy these liabilities, it could have an adverse effect on Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Allscripts’ failure to license and integrate third-party technologies could harm its business.

Allscripts depends upon licenses for some of the technology used in its solutions from third-party vendors, and intends to continue licensing technologies from third parties. These technologies might not continue to be available to Allscripts on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Most of these licenses can be renewed only by mutual consent and may be terminated if Allscripts breaches the terms of the license and fails to cure the breach within a specified period of time. Allscripts’ inability to obtain any of these licenses could delay development until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed and integrated, which would harm its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Most of Allscripts’ third-party licenses are non-exclusive and its competitors may obtain the right to use any of the technology covered by these licenses and use the technology to compete directly with Allscripts. Allscripts’ use of third-party technologies exposes Allscripts to increased risks, including, but not limited to, risks associated with the integration of new technology into its solutions, the diversion of its resources from development of its own proprietary technology and its inability to generate revenue from licensed technology sufficient to offset associated acquisition and maintenance costs. In addition, if Allscripts’ vendors choose to discontinue support of the licensed technology in the future or are unsuccessful in their continued research and development efforts, Allscripts might not be able to modify or adapt its own solutions.

If Allscripts fails to maintain and expand its business with its existing customers, or to effectively transition Allscripts’ customers to newer products, Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Allscripts’ business model depends on the success of its efforts to sell additional products and services to Allscripts’ existing customers, including the sale of Allscripts’ electronic health record products to legacy Misys Healthcare Systems’ practice management customer base. Additionally, certain of Allscripts’ clinical solutions business unit customers initially purchase one or a limited number of Allscripts’ products and services. These customers might choose not to expand their use of, or purchase, additional modules. Also, as Allscripts deploys new applications and features for its existing solutions or introduce new solutions and services, its current customers could choose not to purchase these new offerings. If Allscripts fails to generate additional business from its current customers, Allscripts’ revenue could grow at a slower rate or even decrease.

In addition, the transition of Allscripts’ existing customers to current versions of its products presents certain risks, including the risk of data loss or corruption, or delays in completion. If such events occur, Allscripts’ client relationships and reputation could be damaged, which could adversely affect Allscripts’ business and results of operations.

Potential subsidy of services similar to that of Allscripts may reduce client demand.

Federal regulations have been changed to permit such subsidy from additional sources subject to certain limitations, and HITECH provides federal support for certain electronic medical record initiatives. To the extent that Allscripts does not qualify or participate in such subsidy programs, demand for Allscripts’ services may be reduced, which may decrease Allscripts’ revenues.

Allscripts relies on Misys for the provision of certain corporate services.

Pursuant to Allscripts’ Shared Services Agreement with Misys, as amended, Misys provides Allscripts with services including: (1) human resource functions such as administration, selection of benefit plans and designing employee survey and training programs, (2) management services, (3) procurement services such as travel arrangements, disaster recovery and vendor management, (4) research and development services such as software development, (5) access to information technology, telephony, facilities and other related services at Misys’ customer support center located in Manila, The Philippines; and (6) information system services such as planning, support and database administration. Prior to the closing of the 2008 Transactions, Allscripts did not rely on a third-party for such services. If Misys fails to provide these services as required under the Shared Services Agreement or if the Shared Services Agreement were terminated for any reason, Allscripts might incur significant costs to obtain replacement services.

HITECH is resulting in new business imperatives, and failure to provide Allscripts’ clients with health information technology systems that are “certified” under HITECH could result in breach of some client obligations and put Allscripts at a competitive disadvantage.

HITECH, which is a part of ARRA, provides financial incentives for hospitals and doctors that are “meaningful electronic health record users,” and mandates use of health information technology systems that are “certified” according to technical standards developed under the supervision of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. HITECH also imposes certain requirements upon governmental agencies to use, and requires healthcare providers, health plans, and insurers contracting with such agencies to use, systems that are certified according to such standards. HITECH can adversely affect Allscripts’ business in at least three ways. First, Allscripts has invested and continues to invest in conforming its applicable clinical software to these standards and further significant investment will be required as certification standards evolve. Second, recently signed customers and new client prospects are requiring Allscripts to agree that its software will be certified according to applicable HITECH technical standards so that, assuming clients properly use the electronic health record software and satisfy the “meaningful use” and other requirements of HITECH, they will qualify for available incentive payments. Allscripts plans to meet these requirements as part of Allscripts’ normal software maintenance obligations, and failure to comply could result in costly contract breach and jeopardize Allscripts’ relationships with clients who are relying upon Allscripts to provide certified software. Third, if for some reason Allscripts is not able to comply with these HITECH standards in a timely fashion after their issuance, Allscripts’ offerings will be at a severe competitive disadvantage in the market to the offerings of other electronic health record vendors who have complied.

Changes in interoperability standards applicable to Allscripts’ software could require Allscripts to incur substantial additional development costs.

Allscripts’ clients are concerned with and often require that its software solutions and healthcare devices be interoperable with other third-party HIT suppliers. Market forces or governmental/regulatory authorities could create software interoperability standards that would apply to Allscripts’ solutions, and if Allscripts’ software solutions and/or healthcare devices are not consistent with those standards, Allscripts could be forced to incur substantial additional development costs. The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) has developed a comprehensive set of criteria for the functionality, interoperability and security of various software modules in the HIT industry. CCHIT, however, continues to modify and refine those standards. Achieving CCHIT certification is becoming a competitive requirement, resulting in increased software development and administrative expense to conform to these requirements. These standards and specifications, once finalized, will be subject to interpretation by the entities designated to certify such technology. Allscripts will incur increased development costs in delivering solutions if Allscripts needs to upgrade its software and healthcare devices to be in compliance with these varying and evolving standards, and delays may result in connection therewith. If Allscripts’ software solutions and healthcare devices are not consistent with these evolving standards,

Allscripts’ market position and sales could be impaired and Allscripts may have to invest significantly in changes to Allscripts’ software solutions and healthcare devices, although Allscripts does not expect such costs to be significant in relation to the overall development costs for its solutions.

Risks Related to Allscripts’ Industry

Allscripts is subject to a number of existing laws, regulations and industry initiatives, non-compliance with certain of which could materially adversely affect Allscripts’ operations or otherwise adversely affect Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations, and Allscripts is susceptible to a changing regulatory environment.

As a participant in the healthcare industry, Allscripts’ operations and relationships, and those of Allscripts’ customers, are regulated by a number of federal, state and local governmental entities. The impact of this regulation on Allscripts is direct, to the extent Allscripts is subject to these laws and regulations, and is also indirect in that, in a number of situations, even though Allscripts may not be directly regulated by specific healthcare laws and regulations, Allscripts’ products must be capable of being used by Allscripts’ customers in a manner that complies with those laws and regulations. Inability of Allscripts’ customers to do so could affect the marketability of Allscripts’ products or Allscripts’ compliance with Allscripts’ customer contracts, or even expose Allscripts to direct liability on a theory that Allscripts had assisted its customers in a violation of healthcare laws or regulations. Because Allscripts’ business relationships with physicians are unique, and the healthcare technology industry as a whole is relatively young, the application of many state and federal regulations to Allscripts’ business operations and to Allscripts’ customers is uncertain. Indeed, there are federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including anti-kickback laws and limitations on physician referrals, and laws related to distribution and marketing, including off-label promotion of prescription drugs that may be directly or indirectly applicable to Allscripts’ operations and relationships or the business practices of Allscripts’ customers. It is possible that a review of Allscripts’ business practices or those of Allscripts’ customers by regulatory authorities could result in a determination that could adversely affect Allscripts. In addition, the healthcare regulatory environment may change in a way that restricts Allscripts’ existing operations or Allscripts’ growth. The healthcare industry is expected to continue to undergo significant changes for the foreseeable future, which could have an adverse effect on Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations. Allscripts cannot predict the effect of possible future legislation and regulation.

Specific risks include, but are not limited to, risks relating to:

•

Patient Information. As part of the operation of Allscripts’ business, Allscripts’ customers provide to Allscripts patient-identifiable medical information related to the prescription drugs that they prescribe and other aspects of patient treatment. Government and

industry legislation and rulemaking, especially the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), HITECH standards and requirements published by industry groups such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, require the use of standard transactions, standard identifiers, security and other standards and requirements for the transmission of certain electronic health information. National standards and procedures under HIPAA include the “Standards for Electronic Transactions and Code Sets” (the Transaction Standards); the “Security Standards” (the Security Standards); and the “Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information” (the Privacy Standards). The Transaction Standards require the use of specified data coding, formatting and content in all specified “Health Care Transactions” conducted electronically. The Security Standards require the adoption of specified types of security for certain patient identifiable health information (called Protected Health Information). The Privacy Standards grant a number of rights to individuals as to their Protected Health Information and restrict the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information by Covered Entities, defined as “health plans,” “health care providers, “and “health care clearinghouses.” Allscripts has reviewed its activities and believe that Allscripts is a Covered Entity to the extent that Allscripts maintains a “group health plan” for the benefit of employees. Allscripts has taken steps Allscripts believes to be appropriate and required to bring its group health plan into compliance with HIPAA and HITECH. For Allscripts’ operating functions, Allscripts believes that it is a hybrid entity, with both covered and non-covered functions under HIPAA. The Payerpath portion of Allscripts’ business qualifies as a healthcare clearinghouse when it files electronic healthcare claims on behalf of healthcare providers that are subject to HIPAA and HITECH and Allscripts has instituted policies and procedures to comply with HIPAA and HITECH in that role. With respect to Allscripts’ other business functions, Allscripts does not believe it is a Covered Entity as a healthcare provider or as a healthcare clearinghouse; however, the definition of a healthcare clearinghouse is broad and Allscripts cannot offer any assurance that Allscripts could not be considered a healthcare clearinghouse under HIPAA or that, if Allscripts is determined to be a healthcare clearinghouse, the consequences would not be adverse to Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, certain provisions of the Privacy and Security Standards apply to third-parties that create, access, or receive Protected Health Information in order to perform a function or activity on behalf of a Covered Entity. Such third-parties are called “Business Associates.” Covered Entities must have a written “Business Associate Agreement” with such third parties, containing specified written satisfactory assurances, consistent with the Privacy and Security Standards and HITECH and its implementing regulations, that the third party will safeguard Protected Health Information that it creates or accesses and will fulfill other material obligations. Most of Allscripts’ customers are Covered Entities, and Allscripts functions in many of its relationships as a Business Associate of those customers. Allscripts would face liability under Allscripts’ Business Associate Agreements and HIPAA and HITECH if Allscripts does not comply with Allscripts’ Business Associate obligations and applicable provisions of the Privacy and Security Standards and HITECH and its implementing regulations. The penalties for a violation of HIPAA or HITECH are significant and could have an adverse impact upon Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations, if such penalties ever were imposed. Additionally, Covered Entities that are providers are required to adopt a unique standard National Provider Identifier (NPI) for use in filing and processing healthcare claims and other transactions. Subject to the discussion set forth above, Allscripts believes that the principal effects of HIPAA are, first, to require that Allscripts’ systems be capable of being operated by Allscripts and Allscripts’ customers in a manner that is compliant with the various HIPAA standards and, second, to require Allscripts to enter into and comply with Business Associate Agreements with Allscripts’ Covered Entity customers. For most Covered Entities, the deadlines for compliance with the Privacy Standards and the Transaction Standards occurred in 2003. Covered Entities, with the exception of small health plans (as that term is defined by the Privacy Standards), were required to be in compliance with the Security Standards by April 20, 2005 and to use NPIs in standard transactions no later than the compliance dates, which was May 23, 2007, for all but small health plans, and May 23, 2008 for small health plans. Allscripts has policies and procedures that Allscripts believes comply with all federal and state confidentiality requirements for the handling of Protected Health Information that Allscripts receives and with Allscripts’ obligations under Business Associate Agreements. In particular, Allscripts believes that its systems and products are capable of being used by or for Allscripts’ customers in compliance with the Transaction Standards and Security Standards and are capable of being used by or for Allscripts’ customers in compliance with the NPI requirements. If, however, Allscripts does not follow those procedures and policies, or they are not sufficient to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of Protected Health Information, Allscripts could be subject to civil and/or criminal liability, fines and lawsuits, termination of Allscripts’ customer contracts or its operations could be shut down. Moreover, because all HIPAA Standards and HITECH implementing regulations and guidance are subject to change or interpretation, Allscripts cannot predict the full future impact of HIPAA or HITECH on Allscripts’ business and operations. In the event that the HIPAA or HITECH standards and compliance requirements change or are interpreted in a way that requires any material change to the way in which Allscripts does business, Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Additionally, certain state laws are not preempted by HIPAA and HITECH and may impose independent obligations upon Allscripts or its customers. Additional legislation governing the acquisition, storage and transmission or other dissemination of health record information and other personal information, including social security numbers, has been proposed at the state level. There can be no assurance that changes to state or federal laws will not materially restrict the ability of providers to submit information from patient records using Allscripts’ products and services.

•

Electronic Prescribing. The use of Allscripts’ software by physicians to perform a variety of functions, including electronic prescribing, electronic routing of prescriptions to pharmacies and dispensing, is governed by state and federal law, including fraud and abuse laws. States have differing prescription format requirements, which Allscripts has programmed into

Allscripts’ software. Many existing laws and regulations, when enacted, did not anticipate methods of e-commerce now being developed. While federal law and the laws of many states permit the electronic transmission of certain prescription orders, the laws of several states neither specifically permit nor specifically prohibit the practice. Restrictions exist, however, on the use of e-prescribing for controlled substances and certain other drugs. Given the rapid growth of electronic transactions in healthcare, and particularly the growth of the Internet, Allscripts expects the remaining states to directly address these areas with regulation in the near future. In addition, on November 7, 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services published its final “E-Prescribing and the Prescription Drug Program” regulations (E-Prescribing Regulations). These regulations are required by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) and became effective beginning on January 1, 2006. The E-Prescribing Regulations consist of detailed standards and requirements, in addition to the HIPAA Standard discussed above, for prescription and other information transmitted electronically in connection with a drug benefit covered by the MMA’s Prescription Drug Benefit. These standards cover not only transactions between prescribers and dispensers for prescriptions but also electronic eligibility and benefits inquiries and drug formulary and benefit coverage information. The standards apply to prescription drug plans participating in the MMA’s Prescription Drug Benefit. Other rules governing e-prescribing apply to other areas of Medicare and to Medicaid. The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) authorized a new and separate incentive program for individual eligible professionals who are successful electronic prescribers as defined by MIPPA. This new incentive is separate from and is in addition to the quality reporting incentive program authorized by Division B of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006—Medicare Improvements and Extension Act of 2006 and known as the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI). Eligible professionals do not need to participate in PQRI to participate in the E-Prescribing Incentive Program. For the 2009 e-prescribing reporting year, to be a successful e-prescriber and to receive an incentive payment, an individual eligible professional must report one e-prescribing measure in at least 50% of the cases in which the measure is reportable by the eligible professional during 2009. There is no sign-up or pre-registration to participate in the E-Prescribing Incentive Program. However, there are certain limitations for participation. To the extent that these new initiatives and regulations foster the accelerated adoption of e-prescribing, Allscripts’ business could benefit. But, as noted below, there is no assurance that these government-sponsored efforts will succeed in spurring greater adoption of e-prescribing. Moreover, regulations in this area impose certain requirements which can be burdensome and they are evolving and subject to change at any moment, meaning that any potential benefits may be reversed by a newly-promulgated regulation that adversely affects Allscripts’ business model. Aspects of Allscripts’ clinical products are affected by such regulation because of the need of Allscripts’ customers to comply, as discussed above. Compliance with these regulations could be burdensome, time-consuming and expensive. Allscripts also could become subject to future legislation and regulations concerning the development and marketing of healthcare software systems. For example, regulatory authorities such as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services may impose functionality standards with regard to electronic prescribing and electronic health record technologies. These could increase the cost and time necessary to market new services and could affect Allscripts in other respects not presently foreseeable.

•

Electronic Health Records. A number of important federal and state laws govern the use and content of electronic health record systems, including fraud and abuse laws that may affect the donation of such technology. As a company that provides electronic health record systems to a variety of providers of healthcare, Allscripts’ systems and services must be designed in a manner that facilitates Allscripts’ customers’ compliance with these laws. Because this is a topic of increasing state and federal regulation, Allscripts must continue to monitor legislative and regulatory developments that might affect Allscripts’ business practices as they relate to electronic health record systems. Allscripts cannot predict the content or effect of possible future regulation on Allscripts’ business practices. Also, Allscripts Enterprise EHR, Allscripts Professional EHR and Allscripts MyWay electronic health record are each certified by CCHIT as meeting CCHIT’s certification standards for functionality, interoperability and security. Allscripts’ failure to maintain CCHIT certification or otherwise meet industry standards would adversely impact Allscripts’ business.

•

Claims Transmission. Allscripts’ system electronically transmits claims for prescription medications dispensed by physicians to patients’ payers for immediate approval and reimbursement. Federal law provides that it is both a civil and a criminal violation for any person to submit, or cause to be submitted, a claim to any payer, including, without limitation, Medicare, Medicaid and all private health plans and managed care plans, seeking payment for any services or products that overbills or bills for items that have not been provided to the patient. Allscripts has in place policies and procedures that Allscripts believes assure that all claims that are transmitted by Allscripts’ system are accurate and complete, provided that the information given to Allscripts by its customers is also accurate and complete. If, however, Allscripts does not follow those procedures and policies, or they are not sufficient to prevent inaccurate claims from being submitted, Allscripts could be subject to liability. As discussed above, the HIPAA Transaction Standards and the HIPAA Security Standards also affect Allscripts’ claims transmission services, since those services must be structured and provided in a way that supports Allscripts’ customers’ HIPAA compliance obligations. Furthermore, to the extent that there is some type of security breach, it could have a material adverse effect on Allscripts’ business.

•

Medical Devices. Certain computer software products are regulated as medical devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft policy for the regulation of computer

software products as medical devices. The draft policy is not binding on the industry or the FDA. To the extent that computer software is a medical device under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Allscripts, as a manufacturer of such products, could be required, depending on the product, to register and list Allscripts’ products with the FDA; notify the FDA and demonstrate substantial equivalence to other products on the market before marketing such products; or obtain FDA approval by demonstrating safety and effectiveness before marketing a product. Depending on the intended use of a device, the FDA could require Allscripts to obtain extensive data from clinical studies to demonstrate safety or effectiveness or substantial equivalence. If the FDA requires this data, Allscripts could be required to obtain approval of an investigational device exemption before undertaking clinical trials. Clinical trials can take extended periods of time to complete. Allscripts cannot provide assurances that the FDA will approve or clear a device after the completion of such trials. In addition, these products would be subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act’s general controls, including those relating to good manufacturing practices and adverse experience reporting. Allscripts expects that the FDA is likely to become increasingly active in regulating computer software intended for use in healthcare settings regardless of whether the draft policy is ever revised or finalized. The FDA can impose extensive requirements governing pre- and post-market conditions like approval, labeling and manufacturing. In addition, the FDA can impose extensive requirements governing product design controls and quality assurance processes. Failure to comply with FDA requirements can result in criminal and civil fines and penalties, product seizure, injunction, and civil monetary policies—each of which could have an adverse affect on Allscripts’ business.

•

Red Flag Rules. As of November 1, 2009, medical practices that act as “creditors” to their patients were required to comply with new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rules promulgated under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 that are aimed at reducing the risk of identity theft. These rules require creditors to adopt policies and procedures that identify patterns, practices, or activities that indicate possible identity theft (called “red flags”); detect those red flags; and respond appropriately to those red flags to prevent or mitigate any theft. The rules also require creditors to update their policies and procedures on a regular basis. Because most practices treat their patients without receiving full payment at the time of service, Allscripts’ clients are generally considered “creditors” for purposes of these rules and are required to comply with them. Although Allscripts is not directly subject to these rules—since Allscripts does not extend credit to customers—Allscripts does handle patient data that, if improperly disclosed, could be used in identity theft. On May 28, 2010, the FTC announced that it would delay enforcement of the Red Flag Rule until January 1, 2011.

Additionally, recently enacted public laws reforming the U.S. healthcare system may have an impact on Allscripts’ business. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590; Public Law 111-148) (“PPACA”) and The

Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872) (the “Reconciliation Act”), which amends the PPACA (collectively the “Health Reform Laws”), were signed into law in March 2010. The Health Reform Laws contain various provisions which may impact Allscripts and its customers. Some of these provisions may have a positive impact, by expanding the use of electronic health records in certain federal programs, for example, while others, such as reductions in reimbursement for certain types of providers, may have a negative impact due to fewer available resources. Increases in fraud and abuse penalties may also adversely affect participants in the healthcare sector, including Allscripts.

Increased government involvement in healthcare could adversely affect Allscripts’ business.

U.S. healthcare system reform at both the federal and state level, could increase government involvement in healthcare, lower reimbursement rates and otherwise change the business environment of Allscripts’ customers and the other entities with which Allscripts has a business relationship. Allscripts cannot predict whether or when future healthcare reform initiatives at the federal or state level or other initiatives affecting Allscripts’ business will be proposed, enacted or implemented or what impact those initiatives may have on Allscripts’ business, financial condition or results of operations. Allscripts’ customers and the other entities with which Allscripts has a business relationship could react to these initiatives and the uncertainty surrounding these proposals by curtailing or deferring investments, including those for Allscripts’ products and services. Additionally, the government has signaled increased enforcement activity targeting healthcare fraud and abuse, which could adversely impact Allscripts’ business, either directly or indirectly. To the extent that Allscripts’ customers, most of whom are providers, may be affected by this increased enforcement environment, Allscripts’ business could correspondingly be affected. Additionally, government regulation could alter the clinical workflow of physicians, hospitals and other healthcare participants, thereby limiting the utility of Allscripts’ products and services to existing and potential customers and curtailing broad acceptance of Allscripts’ products and services. Further examples of government involvement could include requiring the standardization of technology relating to electronic health records, providing customers with incentives to adopt electronic health record solutions or developing a low-cost government sponsored electronic health record solution, such as VistA-Office electronic health record. Additionally, certain safe harbors to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and corresponding exceptions to the federal Stark law may alter the competitive landscape. These safe harbors and exceptions are intended to accelerate the adoption of electronic prescription systems and electronic health records systems, and therefore provide new and attractive opportunities for Allscripts to work with hospitals and other donors who wish to provide Allscripts’ solutions to physicians. At the same time, such safe harbors and exceptions may result in increased competition from providers of acute electronic health record solutions, whose hospital customers may seek to donate their existing acute electronic health record solutions to physicians for use in ambulatory settings.

If the electronic healthcare information market fails to develop as quickly as expected, Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

The electronic healthcare information market is in the early stages of development and is rapidly evolving. A number of market entrants have introduced or developed products and services that are competitive with one or more components of the solutions Allscripts offer. Allscripts expects that additional companies will continue to enter this market, especially in response to recent government subsidies. In new and rapidly evolving industries, there is significant uncertainty and risk as to the demand for, and market acceptance of, recently introduced products and services. Because the markets for Allscripts’ products and services are new and evolving, Allscripts is not able to predict the size and growth rate of the markets with any certainty. Allscripts cannot provide assurance that markets for Allscripts’ products and services will develop or that, if they do, they will be strong and continue to grow at a sufficient pace. If markets fail to develop, develop more slowly than expected or become saturated with competitors, Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Consolidation in the healthcare industry could adversely affect Allscripts’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Many healthcare industry participants are consolidating to create integrated healthcare delivery systems with greater market power. As provider networks and managed care organizations consolidate, thus decreasing the number of market participants, competition to provide products and services like those of Allscripts will become more intense, and the importance of establishing relationships with key industry participants will become greater. These industry participants may try to use their market power to negotiate price reductions for Allscripts’ products and services. Further, consolidation of management and billing services through integrated delivery systems may decrease demand for its products. If Allscripts were forced to reduce its prices, Allscripts’ business would become less profitable unless Allscripts were able to achieve corresponding reductions in its expenses.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases by Eclipsys of its equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010:

	(a)	(b)		(c)	(d)
Period	Total ~~Number~~Numberof ofSharesof ~~Shares~~CommonStock ~~of Common Stock~~ Purchased	Average ~~Price~~PricePaid ~~Paid~~PerShare ~~Per~~ofCommon ~~Share of Common~~ Stock		Total Number ofShares of Common StockPurchased as Part ofPublicly AnnouncedPlans or Programs	Maximum Number (orApproximate Dollar Value) ofShares of Common Stock thatMay Yet Be Purchased Underthe Plans or Programs
January 1-31, 2010	—		—	—	—
April 1-30, 2010	—	$	—	—	—
February 1-28, 2010 (1)	30,842	$	18.41	—	—
May 1-31, 2010	—		—	—	—
March 1-31, 2010	174		19.52	—	—
June 1-30, 2010 (1)	8,634		18.98	—	—
Total	318,~~016~~634	$	18.4298	—	—

(1)

These shares were tendered to the Company by employees holding common stock initially issued to them in the form of restricted stock awards in order to reimburse the Company for income tax deposits paid by the Company on their behalf in respect of taxable income resulting from scheduled vesting of restricted shares.

3759

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

Exhibit			Incorporated by Reference
Number	Exhibit Description	Form	Exhibit	Filing Date
2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 9, 2010, by and among Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc., Arsenal Merger Corp. and Eclipsys Corporation	8-K	2.1	June 9, 2010
3.1	Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant	10-Q	3.1	September 21, 1998
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant	8-K	3.21	May 19, 2009
4.1	~~Speciman~~Specimen certificate for shares of Common Stock	S-1	4.1	April 23, 1998
10.1	~~Form~~Framework Agreement, dated as of ~~Performance~~June ~~Stock~~9, ~~Unit~~2010, ~~Agreement~~by and among Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Misys plc with Eclipsys Corporation as a third party beneficiary	8-K	10.1	~~March~~June 199, 2010
10.2	Voting Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2010, by and among Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc., Eclipsys Corporation and Misys plc	8-K	10.2	June 9, 2010
10.3	Voting Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2010, by and among Misys plc and ValueAct Capital Master Fund L.P., with Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Eclipsys Corporation as third party beneficiaries	8-K	10.3	June 9, 2010
10.4	Amendment to the Framework Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2010, by and among Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Misys plc, with Eclipsys Corporation as a third party beneficiary	8-K	10.4	June 27, 2010
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)			Filed herewith
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)			Filed herewith
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350			Filed herewith
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350			Filed herewith
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document		101.INS	Furnished herewith
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document		101.SCH	Furnished herewith
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document		101.CAL	Furnished herewith
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document		101.DEF	Furnished herewith
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document		101.LAB	Furnished herewith
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document		101.PRE	Furnished herewith

38* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: ~~May~~August 45, 2010

ECLIPSYS CORPORATION

Registrant

/s/ Chris E. Perkins

Chris E. Perkins

Chief Financial Officer

(authorized officer and principal financial officer)

3961

Filing Compare · ECLIPSYS CORP