UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-34088

Brink’s Home Security Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia

80-0188977

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

8880 Esters Boulevard, Irving, TX 75063

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(972) 871-3500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at ~~November~~April 427, ~~2009~~2010
Common Stock, no par value		45,~~801~~872,~~867~~480

INDEX

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1412
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		2621
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		2621
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		2622
Item 1a. Risk Factors		2622
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		27
Item 6. Exhibits		22
Item 6. Exhibits		27
Signatures		23
Signatures		28

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements.

BRINK’S HOME SECURITY HOLDINGS, INC.

and subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2008~~2009

($ in millions, except share data)

	Sept. 30,2009			Dec. 31,2008
	March 31,2010			Dec. 31,2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~108~~141.5		$	63113.62
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $6.9 and $4.9 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)		36.3			36.3
Certificates of deposit		5.0			5.0
Prepaid expenses and other		6.6			9.2
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $6.1 and $6.0 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)		33.8			36.5
Deferred income taxes		11.0			24.8
Prepaid expenses and other		8.4			11.4
Total current assets		162.4			133.9
Deferred income taxes		9.3			9.9
Property and equipment, net		699.6			659.3
Total current assets		198.0			176.0
Deferred subscriber acquisition costs, net		84.3			83.7
Property and equipment, net		717.8			710.1
Total Assets	$	946.3		$	876.9
Deferred subscriber acquisition costs, net		84.4			84.5
Total Assets	$	1,000.2		$	970.6
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2126.92		$	2024.4
Payroll and other employee liabilities		1412.45			1512.56
Other accrued liabilities		2926.30			1920.24
Deferred revenue		4647.31			4346.26
Total current liabilities		111.98			98104.30
Deferred revenue		~~182~~181.74			~~181~~182.02
Deferred income taxes		~~138~~152.63			~~104~~149.84
Other liabilities		911.82			1011.86
Total Liabilities		~~443~~456.07			~~394~~447.92
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $10 par value, 2 million shares authorized, no shares issued		—			—
Preferred stock, $10 par value, 2.0 million shares authorized, no shares issued		—			—
Common stock, no par value, 170 million shares authorized, 45.8 million shares issued and outstanding for September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		—			—
Common stock, no par value, 170.0 million shares authorized, 45.9 million shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and 45.8 million shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		5962.09			5460.53
Retained earnings		~~445~~482.93			~~428~~464.98
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1.67	)		(1.47	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		503.3			482.0
Total shareholders’ equity		543.5			523.4
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	~~946~~1,000.32		$	~~876~~970.96

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BRINK’S HOME SECURITY HOLDINGS, INC.

and subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

For the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009

(Unaudited)

($ in millions, except per share data)

	Three months endedSeptember 30,					Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2009		2008			2009			2008
	2010		2009
Revenues	$	~~143~~146.75	$	~~135~~136.40		$	~~419.7~~		$	~~397.1~~
Expenses:
Cost of revenues		7167.76		7665.32			~~204.8~~			~~219.1~~
Selling, general and administrative expenses		5150.32		3645.95			~~142.2~~			~~109.7~~
Total expenses		~~123~~117.08		~~113~~110.27			~~347.0~~			~~328.8~~
Other operating income, net		0.6		0.6			1.2			1.0
Other operating income (expense), net		0.2		(0.2	)
Operating profit		2128.39		2225.81			~~73.9~~			~~69.3~~
Interest expense, net		—		0.2			0.1			0.6
Interest income, net		—		0.1
Income before income taxes		2128.39		2225.62			~~73.8~~			~~68.7~~
Provision for income taxes		811.24		810.60			~~28.9~~			~~26.4~~
Net income	$	1317.15	$	1415.02		$	~~44.9~~		$	~~42.3~~
Other Comprehensive Income
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss) – foreign currency translation adjustments arising during the period		—		—			(0.2	)		0.1
Comprehensive income	$	17.5	$	15.2
Comprehensive income	$	13.1	$	14.0		$	44.7		$	42.4
Earnings per common share (see Note 9 – Earnings per Share)
Earnings per common share (see Note 10 – Earnings per Share)
Basic	$	0.38	$	0.33
Basic	$	0.29	$	0.31		$	0.98		$	0.92
Diluted	$	0.38	$	0.33
Diluted	$	0.28	$	0.30		$	0.98		$	0.92
Weighted average common shares outstanding (see Note 9 – Earnings per Share)
Weighted average common shares outstanding (see Note 10 – Earnings per Share)
Basic		46.0		45.8
Basic		45.9		45.8			45.8			45.8
Diluted		46.3		45.9
Diluted		46.1		45.9			46.0			45.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BRINK’S HOME SECURITY HOLDINGS, INC.

and subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

For the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~ 2010

(Unaudited)

($ in millions)

	CommonStock		AdditionalPaid-inCapital		RetainedEarnings			AccumulatedOther ComprehensiveLoss	~~AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveLoss~~			Total	~~Total~~
Balance as of December 31, 2008	$	—	$	54.5	$	428.9			$	(1.4	)		$	482.0
Balance as of December 31, 2009	$	—	$	60.3	$	464.8		$	(1.7	)		$	523.4
Net income						4417.95							17.5	~~44.9~~
Other comprehensive income										(0.2	)			(0.2	)
Share-based compensation expense				1.8									1.8
Share-based compensation expense				3.6										3.6
Exercise of stock options		—		0.7									0.7
Exercise of stock options		—		0.9										0.9
Excess tax benefit of stock options exercised		—		0.1									0.1
Adjustment to deemed dividend to BCO at Spin-off (See Note 2)						(27.9	)							(27.9	)
Balance as of March 31, 2010	$	—	$	62.9	$	482.3		$	(1.7	)		$	543.5
Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	—	$	59.0	$	445.9			$	(1.6	)		$	503.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BRINK’S HOME SECURITY HOLDINGS, INC.

and subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~ 2009

(Unaudited)

($ in millions)

	Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	4417.95		$	4215.32
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		6723.87			6322.92
Impairment charges from subscriber disconnects		4815.75			4114.40
Amortization of deferred revenue		(299.5	)		(309.53	)
Deferred income taxes		188.31			165.38
Share-based compensation		31.68			—1.3
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable		93.15			73.90
Other operating, net		(10.2	)		0.73
Loss on disposal of assets		0.1			—
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options		(0.1	)		—
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(90.28	)		(8.1.8	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		~~16.~~5.3			710.64
Deferral of subscriber acquisition costs		(~~16.~~4.9	)		(175.95	)
Deferral of revenue from new subscribers		308.56			3410.3
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		21.86			(1.4	)
Other, net		(1.0.5	)		(2.0.7	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	~~185~~69.06		$	~~154~~66.56
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(~~141~~42.21	)		(~~135~~47.32	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(~~141~~42.21	)	$	(~~135~~47.32	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		0.97			—
Net distributions to related parties		—			(18.3	)
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options		0.1			—
Net cash used in financing activities	$	0.98		$	~~(18.3~~—	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		0.2			—
Cash and cash equivalents:
Net increase		4428.93			019.94
Balance at beginning of period		63113.62			363.36
Balance at end of period	$	~~108~~141.5		$	483.20
Supplemental cash flow disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
Adjustment to deemed dividend to BCO at Spin-off (see Note 2)	$	27.9		$	—
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
Cash for income tax refund (payment), net	$	0.1		$	(0.8	)
Interest	$	0.2		$	0.2
Cash paid for interest	$	0.1		$	—
Income taxes, net:
Paid to related parties		—			18.7
Paid to taxing jurisdictions		2.7			0.6

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Description of Business, ~~The Spin-off,~~ Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

Broadview Security, Inc. (“Broadview Security”) changed its name from Brink’s Home Security, Inc. on July 1, 2009. Broadview Security was incorporated in Delaware in 1983, and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brink’s Home Security Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”), a Virginia corporation, on October 31, 2008, upon completion of the spin-off transaction described below. Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Broadview Security, are collectively referred to in this report as the “Company” or “Holdings,” unless otherwise indicated. Historically, the “Company” also refers to Broadview Security prior to the spin-off transaction.

The Company conducts business in one segment. Management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on cash flows and operating profit or loss of the Company as a whole. The Company markets, installs, services, and monitors security alarm systems for over 1.3 million customers in all 50 states and two Canadian provinces. Based on revenues, the Company believes it is the second largest provider of security alarm monitoring services for residential and commercial properties in North America. The Company’s primary customers are residents of single-family homes, which comprise approximately 93% of the Company’s subscriber base.

~~The~~Recent ~~Spin-off~~Developments

On January 18, 2010, we announced that we signed a definitive agreement and plan of merger (“Merger Agreement”) to be merged into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tyco International Ltd (“Tyco”) in a transaction valued at approximately $2.0 billion (the “Merger”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, for each share of our common stock outstanding, our shareholders will generally have the right to receive, at the election of the shareholder, (a) $42.50 in cash (subject to proration to reflect an overall cap on the amount of cash to be paid by Tyco), (b) a combination of $12.75 in cash and a fraction of a Tyco share equal to $29.75 divided by the volume weighted-average price of Tyco’s shares on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) during the 10-trading day period ending on the fifth full day prior to the closing date, subject to a collar between $32.97 and $40.29, or (c) Tyco shares equal to $42.50 divided by the volume weighted-average price detailed in (b) above, subject to the same collar. The Merger Agreement was subsequently amended to provide that, to the extent the closing of the Merger occurs prior to the distribution date of Tyco’s quarterly dividend, which is currently scheduled to be made on May 26, 2010, our shareholders who receive Tyco shares in the Merger will receive the applicable dividend for each Tyco share they receive in the Merger. The Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, various regulatory approvals and approval of our shareholders. We currently expect the Merger to close on or about May 14, 2010. Upon closing of the Merger, we anticipate that Broadview Security will be combined with Tyco’s ADT security business under the ADT brand.

History

On September 12, 2008, the Board of Directors of The Brink’s Company (“BCO”) approved the separation of BCO into two independent, publicly traded companies through the spin-off of the Company to shareholders of BCO. To effect the separation, BCO transferred all outstanding shares of Brink’s Home Security, Inc. through a series of transactions to Holdings, another wholly-owned subsidiary of BCO, which prior to these transactions had no independent assets or operations, and distributed the shares of Holdings to BCO’s shareholders.

Distribution of Holdings’ common stock to the stockholders of BCO occurred on October 31, 2008, at a ratio of one share of Holdings’ common stock for each share of BCO’s common stock held by each such holder as of the record date of October 21, 2008 (“the Spin-off”). Immediately following the Spin-off, Holdings’ common stock began trading “regular way” on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CFL,” reflecting its corporate mission of creating “Customers For Life.” See Note 2 – Transactions with Related Parties for a description of transition services and other agreements entered into between the Company and BCO.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted ~~accounting~~in ~~principles~~the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. The Company believes that the ~~disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.~~

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, prior to the Spin-off, have been prepared using the Company’s historical results of operations and historical basis in its assets and liabilities. Prior to the Spin-off, the historical financial statements included allocations of certain BCO corporate expenses. Those expenses were allocated to the Company based on the most relevant allocation method for the service provided. Management believes such allocations were reasonable; however, they may not be indicative of the actual expense that would have been incurred had the Company been operating as an independent company for the periods prior to the Spin-off. The charges for these functions are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 2 – Transactions with Related Parties for further information regarding allocated expenses.

The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, prior to the Spin-off, may not be indicative of the Company’s future performance and may not reflect what its consolidated results of operations, financial position, and cash flows would have been had the Company operated as an independent company during the periods presented. To the extent that an asset, liability, revenue, or expense is directly associated with the Company, it is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

It disclosures ismade ~~suggested~~are ~~that~~adequate ~~these~~to ~~condensed~~make ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~information benot ~~read~~misleading. inAll ~~conjunction~~intercompany ~~with~~balances ~~the financial statements~~ and ~~the~~transactions ~~notes~~have ~~thereto~~been ~~included~~eliminated in ~~the Company’s annual report for the period ended December 31, 2008 (“Form 10-K”), filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009~~consolidation.

It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report for the period ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2010 and as amended on April 6, 2010 (“Form 10-K”).

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company has identified the following policies as critical accounting policies: revenue recognition, security systems capitalization, deferred subscriber acquisition costs, long-lived asset valuation, useful lives of security systems, allowance for doubtful accounts, and income taxes. These accounting policies are discussed in greater detail in the Company’s Form 10-K.

New Accounting Standards

In ~~August~~September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued anauthoritative ~~amendment~~guidance tofor the accounting ~~standards related~~for torevenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. The guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the ~~measurement~~selling price of ~~liabilities~~a ~~that~~deliverable. ~~are~~The ~~recognized~~selling orprice ~~disclosed~~used atfor ~~fair~~each ~~value~~deliverable will be based on avendor-specific objective ~~recurring~~evidence ~~basis.~~if ~~This~~available, ~~standard~~third-party ~~clarifies~~evidence ~~how~~if avendor-specific ~~company~~objective ~~should~~evidence ~~measure~~is ~~the~~not ~~fair~~available, ~~value~~or ofestimated ~~liabilities~~selling ~~and~~price ~~that~~if ~~restrictions~~neither ~~preventing~~vendor-specific ~~the~~evidence ~~transfer~~nor ofthird-party aevidence is available. The guidance requires arrangements ~~liability~~under ~~should~~which ~~not~~multiple revenue generating activities to be ~~considered~~performed asbe aallocated ~~factor~~at ininception. The residual method under the ~~measurement~~existing ofaccounting ~~liabilities~~guidance ~~within~~has been eliminated. The guidance expands the ~~scope~~disclosure ofrequirements ~~this~~related ~~standard~~to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The guidance becomes effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning in fiscal 2011, with early adoption ofpermitted. ~~this~~The guidance inapplies on a prospective basis unless the Company ~~fourth~~specifically ~~quarter~~elects ofto ~~2009~~apply isthe guidance retrospectively. The Company does not ~~expected~~expect tothat the guidance will have a material ~~effect~~impact on ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~financial position, results of operations, ~~financial position,~~ or cash ~~flow~~flows.

Effective June 30, 2009, the Company adopted a newly issued accounting standard related to accounting for, and disclosure of, subsequent events in its consolidated financial statements. This standard provides the authoritative guidance for subsequent events that was previously addressed only in United States auditing standards. This standard establishes general accounting for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued and requires the Company to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events and whether that was the date the financial statements were issued or available to be issued. This standard does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other applicable GAAP that provide different guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events or transactions. The adoption of this standard in the second quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after September 30, 2009 through November 5, 2009, the date financial statements are issued. During this period, the Company did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.

In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance that related to unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid). These awards are participating securities and should be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method. The adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the calculation or reporting of the Company’s earnings per share.

In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that established requirements for an acquirer to record assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any related noncontrolling interest related to the acquisition of a controlled subsidiary, measured at fair value as of the acquisition date. The adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this guidance clarifies that noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

Note 2 – Transactions with Related Parties

~~Allocation~~Agreements ofRelated ~~BCO’s~~to ~~General~~the ~~and~~Spin-off ~~Administrative~~from ~~Corporate~~BCO ~~Expenses~~

~~For~~Following the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, prior to the~~ Spin-off, the ~~accompanying~~Company ~~consolidated~~has ~~financial~~operated ~~statements~~independently ~~include~~from ~~allocations~~BCO, ofand ~~certain~~has no ownership interest in BCO. ~~corporate~~As ~~expenses~~a ~~for~~part ~~services provided~~of tothe Spin-off, the Company entered ~~including~~into certain ~~treasury~~agreements, ~~accounting,~~including ~~tax,~~the ~~legal,~~Tax ~~internal~~Matters ~~audit,~~Agreement ~~human~~(“TMA”) ~~resources,~~and ~~investor~~the ~~relations,~~Brand ~~general~~Licensing ~~management,~~Agreement. ~~real~~In ~~estate,~~order ~~insurance,~~to ~~risk~~govern ~~management,~~the ~~and~~ongoing ~~other~~relationships ~~functions,~~between ~~such~~the asCompany ~~board~~and ofBCO ~~directors~~after ~~and~~the ~~other centrally~~Spin-off ~~managed~~and ~~employee~~to ~~benefit~~provide ~~arrangements.~~mechanisms ~~The~~for ~~Company~~an orderly ~~recorded~~transition, ~~allocated~~the ~~costs~~Company ofand ~~$0.4~~BCO ~~million~~agreed ~~for~~to ~~the~~certain ~~three~~non-compete ~~months~~and ~~ended~~non-solicitation ~~September 30~~arrangements. Also, ~~2008~~the Company and ~~$3.7~~BCO ~~million~~agreed ~~for~~to ~~the~~indemnify ~~nine~~each ~~months~~other ~~ended~~against ~~September 30,~~certain ~~2008~~liabilities ~~within~~arising ~~selling,~~from ~~general,~~their ~~and administrative~~respective ~~expenses~~businesses.

Receivable from and Payable to Related Parties

Prior to the Spin-off, BCO provided the Company with funds for its operating cash when needed. Any excess funds were advanced to BCO. Intercompany accounts were maintained for such borrowings that occurred between the Company and its parent. For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company reflected intercompany activity with BCO as a financing activity. Interest expense under this arrangement was $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There was no interest expense under this arrangement for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Interest expense incurred by the Company associated with its payable to related parties other than BCO was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. There was no interest expense of this nature recorded for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Non-cash Transactions

At Spin-off, the Company transferred to BCO net assets of a wholly-owned subsidiary in the amount of $139.2 million. Additionally, the Company transferred other operating assets and liabilities in the net amount of $12.4 million. These two items comprise the $151.6 million non-cash transfer of net assets and liabilities to BCO at Spin-off. The net effect of the $50.0 million cash received from BCO and the elimination of the net intercompany payables resulted in a deemed dividend to BCO in the amount of $31.8 million, a non-cash transaction, reducing retained earnings at the Spin-off date. As a result of a tax transaction described below, the deemed non-cash dividend was increased by $27.9 in the third quarter of 2009.

Allocation of Income Tax Expense

For the periods prior to the Spin-off, the Company and its U.S. subsidiaries were included in the consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return filed by BCO. BCO’s consolidated tax provision and actual cash payments for U.S. federal and state income taxes were allocated to the Company in accordance with BCO’s tax allocation policy.

In accordance with the Tax Matters Agreement between the Company and BCO (the “TMA”), BCO is, in general, responsible for all taxes reported on any joint return through the date of Spin-off, which may include the Company for periods prior to the Spin-off. In September 2009, pursuant to the TMA, BCO elected several tax accounting method changes related to the Company’s operations, primarily involving the timing of deductions for deferred installation fees and deferred monitoring revenue. These elections have been implemented in BCO’s U.S. Federal 2008 consolidated tax return which includes operating results of the Company’s domestic U.S. subsidiary for the period January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008. These elections decreased the carrying value of certain deferred tax assets and increased the carrying value of certain deferred tax liabilities which were allocated to the Company at the Spin-off and have subsequently been carried on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. As a result of these elections made by BCO, the Company has decreased its current deferred tax assets by $16.4 million and increased its noncurrent deferred tax liabilities by $11.5 million, with an offsetting reduction of $27.9 million in retained earnings to increase the amount of the deemed dividend recorded as a non-cash transaction related to the Spin-off as of September 30, 2009.

Brand License Agreement

~~Historically,~~Pursuant to the ~~Company~~Brand ~~had~~Licensing aAgreement, ~~brand license agreement with a subsidiary of~~ BCO ~~that~~allows ~~allowed~~ the Company to use ~~BCO’s~~ trademarks for certain products and services for a royalty fee ~~based on~~ approximately ~~7.0% of revenues. Since the Spin-off, the royalty rate the Company paid to BCO for the use of certain trademarks has decreased to approximately~~ 1.25% of ~~revenues~~revenue. ~~pursuant~~The ~~to the~~ Brand Licensing Agreement ~~between~~is ~~BCO~~effective ~~and the Company. The royalty rate will continue to be approximately 1.25% of revenues~~ until the earlier of October 31, 2011, or when the Company ceases active use of the trademarks. The Company announced its new brand name, Broadview Security, on June 30, 2009 and has begun the process to transition away from its heritage name; however, the Company currently expects that it will continue to actively use BCO’s trademarks for a significant portion, if not all, of the available time remaining on the Brand Licensing Agreement. Royalty expense was $1.78 million and ~~$9.4~~ ~~million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and~~ $5.1 ~~million and $27~~.36 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively, and is included in cost of revenues.

Transition Services and Other Agreements Related to the Spin-off from BCO

Following the Spin-off, the Company has operated independently from BCO, and has no ownership interest in BCO. As a part of the Spin-off, the Company entered into certain agreements, including the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the TMA, the Employee Matters Agreement, the Brand Licensing Agreement, and the Transition Services Agreement (the “TSA”). In order to govern the ongoing relationships between the Company and BCO after the Spin-off and to provide

mechanisms for an orderly transition, the Company and BCO agreed to certain non-compete and non-solicitation arrangements. Also, the Company and BCO agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities arising from their respective businesses. The specified services that the Company can receive, as requested from BCO, include tax, legal, accounting, treasury, investor relations, insurance and risk management, and human resources. The services are paid for by the Company, as set forth in the TSA. The TSA provides for terms ranging from 6 to 18 months for such services. The Company incurred less than $0.1 million in expense for services provided by BCO pursuant to the TSA for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Note 3 – Property and Equipment, net

The following table presents the Company’s property and equipment, net:

(In millions)	~~Sept.~~March 3031,~~2009~~2010			Dec. 31,~~2008~~2009
Land	$	2.5		$	2.5
Buildings		15.5			15.5
Leasehold improvements		56.35			36.41
Security systems		~~992~~1,031.39			~~925~~1,012.65
Capitalized software		2622.54			2421.28
Computers and office equipment		4952.8			4351.9
		1,091.9			1,015.1
		1,131.6			1,110.3
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(~~392~~413.38	)		(~~355~~400.82	)
Property and equipment, net	$	~~699~~717.68		$	~~659~~710.31

The following table presents depreciation and amortization expense:

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,				Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
(In millions)	~~2009~~2010		~~2008~~2009		~~2009~~		~~2008~~
Property and equipment	$	20.08	$	1819.52	$	~~58.8~~	$	~~54.0~~
Deferred subscriber acquisition costs		32.09		3.0		~~9.0~~		~~9.9~~
Total Depreciation and Amortization	$	23.07	$	2122.52	$	~~67.8~~	$	~~63.9~~

Note 4 – Income Taxes

Income tax provisions for interim periods are based on estimated annual income tax rates calculated separately from the effect of significant, infrequent, or unusual items. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 was 3839.54% compared with ~~38.0% in the same period last year. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was~~ 39.27% ~~compared with 38.4%~~ in the same period last year.

The TMA ~~between~~provides that the Company ~~and~~is ~~BCO~~required ~~governs~~to indemnify BCO’s and its affiliates against all tax-related liabilities caused by the ~~Company’s~~failure ~~respective~~of ~~rights,~~the ~~responsibilities~~Spin-off ~~and~~to ~~obligations~~qualify ~~with~~for ~~respect~~tax-free totreatment for United States federal income tax purposes to the extent these liabilities ~~and~~arise ~~benefits,~~as ~~the~~a ~~preparation~~result ~~and~~of ~~filing~~any action taken by Holdings or any of ~~tax~~Holdings’ ~~returns,~~subsidiaries following the ~~control~~Spin-off ofor ~~audits,~~otherwise result ~~and~~from ~~other~~any ~~tax~~breach ~~matters.~~of ~~The~~any covenant under the TMA ~~generally~~or ~~allocates~~any ~~responsibility~~other ~~for~~agreement ~~consolidated~~entered ~~tax~~into ~~liabilities~~by ~~for periods~~the ~~prior~~Company toin connection with the Spin-off. toThough ~~BCO~~valid ~~and~~as ~~for~~between ~~stand-alone~~the ~~tax~~parties, ~~liabilities~~the ~~prior~~TMA tois ~~and~~not ~~subsequent~~binding toon the ~~Spin-off~~Internal toRevenue Service. In connection with the Merger, the Company ~~(see~~and ~~Note~~Tyco 2entered –into ~~Transactions~~an agreement with ~~Related~~BCO ~~Parties)~~whereby BCO consented to the assignment of the TMA to Tyco.

The TMA provides that the Company is required to indemnify BCO and its affiliates against all tax-related liabilities caused by the failure of the Spin-off to qualify for tax-free treatment for United States federal income tax purposes to the extent these liabilities arise as a result of any action taken by Holdings or any of Holdings’ subsidiaries following the Spin-off or otherwise result from any breach of any covenant under the TMA or any other agreement entered into by the Company in connection with the Spin-off. Though valid as between the parties, the TMA is not binding on the IRS.

Note 5 – Share-Based Compensation Plans

On February 19, 2010, the Company granted stock options under the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase 209,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain employees. The ~~following~~exercise ~~table~~price ~~presents~~for ~~share~~the ~~based~~stock ~~compensation~~option ~~expense:~~grants was $41.23, which was equal to the average high and low of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The stock options granted generally vest over a three year annual graded schedule. The grant date fair value of these stock options approximated $3.0 million.

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,				Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
(In millions)	2009		2008		2009		2008
Plans sponsored by BCO	$	—	$	0.6	$	—	$	1.5
Deferred compensation plan sponsored by BCO		—		0.1		—		0.2
Holdings stock options, restricted and deferred stock units		0.8		—		2.7		—
Holdings deferred compensation		0.2		—		0.9		—
Total share-based compensation	$	1.0	$	0.7	$	3.6	$	1.7

Share-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense and was $1.8 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Prior to the Spin-off, certain employees of the Company participated in BCO’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 1988 Stock Option Plan. Under these plans, employees were granted options to purchase stock in BCO. Certain employees also participated in BCO’s Key Employees’ Deferred Compensation Program. The expense incurred for stock options and deferred compensation related to Company employees has been reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income in selling, general, and administrative expenses. In connection with the Spin-off, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted stock incentive plans providing for future awards to the Company’s employees and directors. See Form 10-K for descriptions of the plans.

In connection with the Spin-off, BCO’s share-based awards held by Company employees and newly appointed non-employee directors were converted to and replaced with, respectively, equivalent share-based awards of Holdings based on the ratio of the Company’s fair market value of stock when issued to the fair market value of BCO stock. The number of shares and, for options, the ratio of the exercise price to market price were equitably adjusted to preserve the intrinsic value of the award as of immediately prior to the Spin-off. The conversion was accounted for as a modification and resulted in a $0.6 million aggregate increase in the fair value of option awards. Of the total amount, the Company recorded less than $0.1 million of non-cash compensation expense in selling and general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and approximately $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The remaining modification expense of $0.1 million will be recorded through 2011.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, options for approximately 33,000 shares of common stock were exercised under the Company’s equity incentive plans.

On February 20, 2009, the Company granted stock options to certain employees to purchase 325,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. The exercise price for the stock option grant is $21.19, which is equal to the average of the high and low of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The stock options granted generally vest on a three year cliff vesting schedule. The grant date fair value of these stock options approximated $2.2 million.

On May 18, 2009, non-management members of the Company’s Board of Directors were awarded approximately 16,000 restricted stock units in the aggregate under the Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Plan. The units granted vest in one year. The grant date fair value of these restricted stock units was approximately $0.5 million.

Note 6 – Credit Agreement

On October 21, 2008, the Company entered into a credit agreement (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) that provides for a four-year unsecured $75 million revolving credit facility with a syndicate of lenders led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the administrative agent (“Credit Facility”). The Company has the option, under certain conditions, to increase the commitment by up to $50 million, not to exceed $125 million in the aggregate. The Credit Facility is available for general corporate purposes, including the issuance of letters of credit of up to $15 million.

The Credit ~~Facility~~Agreement ~~agreement~~ includes a requirement that the Company maintain: (i) a Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit ~~Facility agreement~~Agreement) of no more than 2.5 to 1.0 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, measured on a trailing four-quarters basis, and (ii) a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit ~~Facility agreement~~Agreement) of at least 2.0 to 1.0 for the same trailing four quarter period. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, the Company is in compliance with the requirements of the Credit ~~Facility agreement~~Agreement.

11The pricing on the Credit Facility is based on, generally at the Company’s discretion, the greater of the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus one-half of one percent, or LIBOR, plus an adjustment based on the Company’s leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Company is charged a commitment fee between 0.25% and 0.35% on the unused portion of the facility, tiered based on the Company’s leverage ratio.

As of March 31, 2010, no funds have been drawn under the Credit Facility, but the Company has used the Credit Facility to

~~The pricing on the Credit Facility is based on, generally at the Company’s discretion, the greater of~~ ~~the~~issue ~~Prime~~letters ~~Rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus one-half~~ of ~~one~~credit ~~percent,~~totaling ~~or LIBOR, plus an adjustment based on the Company’s leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility agreement~~$4.3 ~~The Company is charged a commitment fee between 0~~million.~~25%~~ ~~and 0.35% on the unused portion of the facility, tiered based on the Company’s leverage ratio.~~

AsIn oforder ~~September 30,~~for ~~2009,~~us noto ~~funds~~comply ~~have~~with certain ~~been~~operating ~~drawn~~covenants ~~under~~included in the ~~Credit~~Merger ~~Facility~~Agreement, ~~but~~and as contemplated by the ~~Company~~Merger ~~has~~Agreement, ~~used~~we ~~the~~entered ~~Credit~~into ~~Facility~~an toamendment ~~issue~~and ~~letters~~received ofa ~~credit~~limited ~~totaling~~consent ~~$2.7~~and ~~million~~waiver to the Credit Agreement.

Note 7 – ~~Other~~Geographic ~~Operating~~Information ~~Income, Net~~

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,					Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
(In millions)	2009		2008			2009		2008
Royalty income from a third party	$	—	$	0.9		$	—	$	1.4
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses), net		0.5		(0.1	)		1.1		(0.4	)
Other		0.1		(0.2	)		0.1		—
Total	$	0.6	$	0.6		$	1.2	$	1.0

Revenues by country for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

Note 8 – Geographic Information


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In millions)	2010		2009
United States	$	144.4	$	134.3
Canada		2.1		1.7

Total	$	146.5	$	136.0

Revenues by country for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,				Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
(In millions)	2009		2008		2009		2008
United States	$	141.7	$	133.4	$	414.1	$	391.0
Canada		2.0		2.0		5.6		6.1
Total	$	143.7	$	135.4	$	419.7	$	397.1

No single customer represents more than 10% of total revenue.

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009, long-lived assets, consisting of property and equipment, net, and deferred charges by country were as follows:

(In millions)	~~September,~~March ~~302009~~31,2010		December 31,~~2008~~2009
United States	$	~~770~~788.73	$	~~730~~780.9
Canada		13.29		1213.17
Total	$	~~783~~802.92	$	~~743~~794.06

Net liabilities related to the Canadian operations totaled $10.1 million as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~ 2010 and $20.26 million at December 31, ~~2008~~2009.

Note 98 – Commitments and Contingencies

Joint and Several Liability with ~~The~~BCO ~~Brink’s Company~~

Under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992, as amended (the “Health Benefit Act”), BCO and its majority-owned subsidiaries at July 20, 1992, including certain material subsidiaries of the Company, are jointly and severally liable with certain of BCO’s other current and former subsidiaries for health care coverage obligations provided for by the Health Benefit Act. ~~These obligations were $250 million as of December~~ ~~31, 2008.~~ A Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Associate trust has been established by BCO to pay for these liabilities, although the trust may not have sufficient funds to satisfy the obligations. The Company entered into an agreement with BCO ~~pursuant~~in to which BCO agreed to indemnify the Company for any and all liabilities and expenses related to BCO’s former coal operations, including any health care coverage obligations.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is ~~involved~~ involved in various lawsuits and claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company has recorded accruals for losses that are considered probable and reasonably estimable associated with these matters. The Company believes that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial position; however, losses, or changes in estimates of losses, from these matters may result in income or expense in any one accounting period that is material in comparison to the earnings of that period.

12In April 2009, a Michigan state circuit court jury rendered a verdict against the Company for $4.2 million pertaining to claims made by a terminated employee of the Company. On July 7, 2009, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $4.7 million. This amount included approximately $0.5 million in pre-judgment interest and attorney fees. After post-trial proceedings, on September 25, 2009, the trial court entered a revised judgment in the amount of $3.5 million. The amount of the revised judgment has been included in other accrued liabilities as of March 31, 2010. On October 16, 2009, the Company filed an appeal seeking reversal of the judgment or in the alternative a new trial, based on various alleged points of error by the trial court. In connection with the appeal, the trial court ordered a stay of execution on the judgment which requires the Company to post an appeal bond. The Company has filed its initial appeal brief and a reply to the plaintiff’s brief but no date has yet been set for oral argument.

~~believes~~Note ~~that~~9 ~~the~~– ~~ultimate~~Earnings ~~disposition~~per ofShare these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial position; however, losses, or changes in estimates of losses, from these matters may result in income or expense in any one accounting period that is material in comparison to the earnings of that period.

~~In April~~Basic ~~2009,~~earnings aper ~~Michigan~~share ~~state~~(“EPS”) ~~circuit~~was ~~court~~computed ~~jury~~by ~~rendered~~dividing anet ~~verdict~~income ~~against~~by the ~~Company~~weighted ~~for $4.2~~average ~~million~~number ~~pertaining~~of tocommon ~~claims~~shares ~~made~~outstanding byfor ~~a terminated employee of~~ the ~~Company.~~three months Onended ~~July~~March 731, ~~2009,~~2010 ~~the~~and ~~trial~~2009. ~~court~~Diluted ~~entered~~EPS ~~judgment~~was calculated in ~~favor~~a ofsimilar ~~the plaintiff~~manner ~~for~~but ~~$4.7 million. This amount~~ included ~~approximately~~the ~~$0.5~~dilutive ~~million~~effect inof ~~pre-judgment~~stock ~~interest~~options and ~~attorney~~restricted ~~fees.~~stock ~~After~~units ~~post-trial~~outstanding ~~proceedings,~~for ~~on September 25, 2009,~~ the ~~trial~~respective ~~court~~periods. ~~entered~~To athe ~~revised~~extent ~~judgment~~these insecurities ~~the amount of~~were ~~approximately~~anti-dilutive, ~~$3.5~~they ~~million.~~were ~~The~~excluded ~~amount~~from of the ~~revised~~calculation ~~judgment~~of ~~has~~diluted ~~been~~earnings ~~included~~per inshare. ~~other~~For ~~accrued~~the ~~liabilities~~three asmonths ofended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009.~~2010 Onand ~~October 16,~~ 2009, ~~the~~0.1 million ~~Company~~and ~~filed to appeal the revised judgment~~1.2 million Inshares ~~connection~~were ~~with the appeal~~anti-dilutive, ~~the~~ ~~trial court ordered a stay of execution on the judgment which requires the Company to post an appeal bond~~respectively.

Note 10 – Earnings per Share


(In millions, except EPS)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010		2009
Earnings:
Net income	$	17.5	$	15.2


Shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		46.0		45.8
Adjustment for assumed dilution — stock options and restricted stock awards		0.3		0.1


Weighted average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents		46.3		45.9


Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.38	$	0.33
Diluted		0.38		0.33

~~For~~11 the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, basic earnings per share (“EPS”) was computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Diluted EPS was calculated in a similar manner but included the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. To the extent these securities were anti-dilutive, they were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 0.1 million and 0.7 million shares were anti-dilutive, respectively.

For periods prior to the Spin-off, no common stock of Holdings and none of Holdings’ equity awards were outstanding. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were computed on a pro forma basis using the average number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding from October 31, 2008 to December 31, 2008. The number of diluted shares used in the calculation was based on the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding plus the estimated potential dilution that could have occurred if options and restricted stock units granted under the Company’s equity-based compensation arrangements were exercised or converted into the Company’s common stock.

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,				Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
(In millions, except EPS)	2009		2008		2009		2008
Earnings:
Net income	$	13.1	$	14.0	$	44.9	$	42.3
Shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		45.9		45.8		45.8		45.8
Adjustment for assumed dilution — stock options and restricted stock awards		0.2		0.1		0.2		0.1
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents		46.1		45.9		46.0		45.9
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.29	$	0.31	$	0.98	$	0.92
Diluted		0.28		0.30		0.98		0.92

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (~~the “Exchange Act”) (~~which Sections were adopted as part of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Statements preceded by, followed by, or that otherwise include the ~~words~~ words “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “prospects,” “outlook,” and similar words or expressions, or future or ~~conditional~~ conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may,” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts. These forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any anticipated results, performance or achievements. WeExcept as required by law, we disclaim any intention, and undertake no obligation, to revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, a future event, or otherwise. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control, include, but are not limited to risks related to the Merger, risks inherent in the ~~spin~~Spin-off from our former parent corporation, ~~including increased costs and reduced profitability associated with operating as an independent company,~~ the demand for our products and services, the ability to identify and execute further cost and operational improvements and efficiencies in our core business, the actions of competitors, our ability to successfully build and market a new brand, our ability to identify strategic opportunities and integrate them successfully, our ability to maintain subscriber growth, the number of household moves, the level of home sales or new home construction, potential instability in housing credit markets, our ~~estimated reconnection experience, our~~ ability to cost-effectively develop or incorporate new systems or technology in a timely manner, our ability to balance the cost of acquiring customers with the profit from serving existing customers, our ability to keep disconnect rates relatively low, the availability and cost of capital, and general business conditions. For additional risks and uncertainties that could impact our forward-looking statements, please see Part II Item 1A, “Risk Factors” herein, and also the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009, filed with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”), on February 24, 2010 and amended on Form 10-K/A filed on April 6, 2010 (“Form 10-K”), which includes, but is not limited to, the discussion under “Risk Factors” therein, ~~filed with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”),~~ which you may view at www.sec.gov.

General

The ~~following~~ following discussion, which presents the results of Brink’s Home Security Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and ~~notes~~ notes thereto at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009.

As used in this Report, (a) references to “Holdings,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Brink’s Home Security Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Broadview Security, Inc. (“Broadview Security,” formerly named Brink’s Home Security, Inc.), after the spin-off transaction described below, and (b) references to the “Company” on a historical basis, prior to the spin-off transaction, refer to Broadview Security and its consolidated subsidiaries, in each case unless the context requires otherwise.

This discussion is intended to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from period to period, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, how operating results affect our financial condition and results of our operations of the Company as a whole, and how certain accounting principles and estimates affect our financial statements. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to earnings per share (“EPS”) are on a diluted basis.

~~The~~Recent ~~Spin-off~~Developments

On ~~September~~January 1218, ~~2008~~2010, ~~the~~we ~~Board~~signed ofa ~~Directors~~definitive ofagreement ~~The~~and ~~Brink’s~~plan ~~Company~~of merger (“~~BCO~~Merger Agreement”) ~~approved~~to ~~the~~be ~~separation~~merged ~~of BCO~~ into ~~two~~a ~~independent,~~wholly-owned subsidiary ~~publicly~~of ~~traded~~Tyco ~~companies~~International ~~through~~Ltd ~~the~~(“Tyco”) ~~spin-off~~in ofa ~~the~~transaction ~~Company~~valued toat ~~shareholders~~approximately of$2.0 ~~BCO~~billion (the “~~Spin-off~~Merger”). ToThe ~~effect~~Merger ~~the~~is ~~Spin-off~~subject to customary closing conditions, ~~BCO~~various ~~transferred~~regulatory ~~all~~approvals ~~outstanding~~and ~~shares~~approval of ~~Brink’s~~our ~~Home~~shareholders. ~~Security,~~We currently ~~Inc.~~expect the Merger to ~~Holdings,~~close ~~another~~on ~~wholly-owned subsidiary~~or ofabout ~~BCO~~May 14, ~~through~~2010. aUpon ~~series~~closing of ~~transactions~~the ~~pursuant~~Merger, towe aanticipate ~~Separation~~that ~~and~~Broadview ~~Distribution~~Security ~~Agreement~~will ~~between~~be ~~BCO~~combined ~~and~~with ~~Holdings.~~Tyco’s OnADT ~~October 31,~~security ~~2008,~~business ~~BCO~~under ~~distributed all of~~ the ~~shares~~ADT ofbrand. ~~Holdings~~This topending ~~the~~transaction ~~stockholders~~may significantly ofimpact ~~BCO~~our atoperations aand ~~ratio~~continuation of ~~one share~~historical oftrends ~~Holdings~~in ~~common~~future ~~stock~~periods ~~for~~as ~~each~~it ~~share~~becomes ofmore ~~BCO~~difficult ~~common~~to ~~stock~~reasonably ~~held~~estimate bytrends ~~each~~affecting ~~such~~our ~~holder~~company, ascapital ofresource ~~the~~needs, ~~record~~and ~~date~~other ~~of October 21, 2008~~items.

~~On November 3,~~History 2008, after completion of the Spin-off, our stock began trading “regular way” as an independent public company on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CFL”, reflecting our corporate mission of creating “Customers For Life.”

14On September 12, 2008, the Board of Directors of The Brink’s Company (“BCO”) approved the separation of BCO into two independent, publicly traded companies through the spin-off of the Company to shareholders of BCO (the “Spin-off”). To

As effect ~~a condition of~~ the Spin-off, weBCO ~~are~~transferred ~~required~~all outstanding shares of Brink’s Home Security, Inc. to ~~change~~Holdings, ~~the~~another ~~name~~wholly-owned subsidiary of ~~the~~BCO, ~~Company~~through ~~prior~~a series of transactions pursuant to a Separation and Distribution Agreement between BCO and Holdings. On October 31, ~~2011.~~ We2008, ~~intend~~BCO distributed all of the shares of Holdings to ~~propose~~the stockholders of BCO at a ~~vote~~ratio toof ~~change~~one ~~the~~share ~~name~~of Holdings common stock for each share of BCO common stock held by each such holder as of the ~~Company~~record atdate of October 21, 2008. On November 3, 2008, after completion of the Spin-off, our ~~next~~stock ~~annual~~began ~~shareholders’~~trading ~~meeting~~“regular toway” beas ~~held~~an inindependent ~~May~~public ~~2010~~company on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CFL”, reflecting our corporate mission of creating “Customers For Life.”

As a condition of the Spin-off, we were required to change the name of the Company prior to October 31, 2011. We announced Broadview Security as our new brand name on June 30, 2009 and immediately began the process to transition away from our heritage name. The change was a name change only. The corporate structure and management of the Company did not change.

We began marketing efforts in July 2009 to promote awareness of the new brand through advertisements via television media, internet, direct mail, yellow pages, and messaging to our existing subscriber base (“Brand Introduction”). The Brand Introduction also includes costs to create the new brand, convert building signage, re-decal our vehicle fleet, issue new technician uniforms, change customer yard signs, and other similar brand conversion activities.

Overview

We provide monitored security alarm services in North America for owner-occupied single-family residences and commercial properties. We typically install and own the on-site security alarm systems and charge fees to monitor and service the systems. We attribute our success to our focus on quality service, customer retention, and a disciplined approach to growth. We believe our business is a premium provider of services in the markets that we serve.

We have grown consistently over the past several years due to our ability to attract and retain customers by providing quality services while operating as efficiently as possible. Revenues are fairly predictable as most monitoring service revenues are governed by initial three-year monitoring contracts that generally include recurring one-year renewal clauses. Over the past three years, recurring revenues have been approximately 90% of total revenues. Our primary customers are residents of single-family homes which comprise approximately 93% of our subscriber base.

We announced Broadview Security as our new brand name on June 30, 2009 and have begun the process to transition away from our heritage name. The change was a name change only. The corporate structure and management of the Company remain the same. We began marketing efforts in July 2009 to promote brand awareness through advertisements via television media, internet, direct mail, yellow pages, and messaging to our existing subscriber base (“Brand Introduction”). The Brand Introduction also includes costs to create the new brand, convert building signage, re-decal our vehicle fleet, issue new technician uniforms, change customer yard signs, and other similar brand conversion activities. We monitor the awareness, perception, and acceptance of the Broadview Security brand name periodically to guide us on the method, extent, and duration of the Brand Introduction and to determine if we will cease to use our heritage brand name prior to the termination of the Brand Licensing Agreement with BCO on October 31, 2011.

For further information regarding our business, industry trends, and risks and uncertainties, refer to our Form 10-K.

Key Performance Indicators and Cash Flow Measures

The success of our business model depends on recurring contractual revenues and cash flows from our ongoing subscriber base. Key drivers of recurring contractual revenues are subscriber growth and continuous focus on existing customer retention. It is important to minimize subscriber cancellations as the majority of costs associated with a subscriber are incurred at installation. It currently takes approximately four years to recover our initial cash investment in a new subscriber. We use some of the cash flows from the ongoing subscriber base to finance the costs necessary to grow the subscriber base. We continually balance the current cost of growth with the future benefit of recurring contractual revenues. The recurring nature of our net operating cash flows tends to buffer, but not eliminate, the impact of negative trends in the general economy. In evaluating our results, we review the following key performance indicators:

Key Performance Indicators

~~Monthly~~The ~~Recurring~~success of ~~Revenue~~our ~~(“MRR”)~~business ismodel adepends ~~non-GAAP~~on ~~measure~~recurring ~~that~~contractual isrevenues ~~used~~and tocash ~~evaluate~~flows ~~performance. MRR~~from ~~measures~~our ~~the~~ongoing ~~amount~~subscriber base. Key drivers of recurring contractual revenues ~~from~~are subscriber ~~fees~~growth and continuous focus on existing customer retention. It is ~~calculated~~important to ~~based~~minimize onsubscriber cancellations as the ~~number~~majority of ~~subscribers~~costs associated with a subscriber are incurred at installation. It currently takes approximately four years to recover our initial cash investment in a new subscriber. We use some of the cash ~~period~~flows ~~end~~from ~~multiplied~~the byongoing subscriber base to finance the ~~average~~costs ~~fee~~necessary ~~per~~to grow the subscriber ~~received~~base. inWe continually balance the ~~last~~current ~~month~~cost of ~~the~~growth ~~period~~with ~~for~~the ~~contracted~~future ~~monitoring~~benefit ~~and~~of ~~maintenance~~recurring ~~services~~contractual revenues. On ~~page~~The ~~22,~~recurring ~~MRR~~nature isof ~~described~~our innet ~~greater~~operating cash ~~detail~~flows ~~and~~tends isto ~~accompanied~~buffer bybut anot ~~reconciliation~~eliminate the impact of ~~MRR~~negative ~~to revenue,~~trends ~~its~~in ~~closest~~the ~~GAAP~~general ~~counterpart~~economy. In evaluating our results, we review the following key performance indicators:

~~Subscriber~~Monthly ~~Growth~~Recurring —Revenue ~~The~~(“MRR”) ~~growth~~is ofa ~~our~~non-GAAP ~~subscriber~~measure ~~base~~used isto ~~crucial~~evaluate toperformance. MRR ~~drive~~measures the amount of ~~MRR~~recurring ~~expansion~~revenues from subscriber fees and tois ~~leverage~~calculated ~~our~~based ~~costs~~on the number of ~~operations.~~subscribers ~~Despite~~at aperiod ~~challenging~~end ~~housing~~multiplied ~~market~~by ~~and~~the ~~generally~~average ~~weak~~fee ~~economic~~per ~~conditions,~~subscriber ~~our~~received ~~ending~~in ~~subscriber~~the ~~base~~last ~~has~~month ~~continued~~of tothe ~~grow~~period asfor ~~presented~~contracted monitoring and maintenance services. On page 18, MRR is described in ~~the~~greater ~~table~~detail onand ~~page~~is 21accompanied by a reconciliation of MRR to revenue, its closest GAAP counterpart.

~~Customer~~Subscriber ~~Retention~~Growth — The ~~strength~~growth of our ~~economic~~subscriber ~~model~~base is ~~highly~~crucial ~~dependent~~to ondrive ~~customer~~MRR ~~retention.~~expansion Weand ~~believe~~to leverage our ~~disconnect rate~~costs ~~is the lowest among the major monitored security service companies~~of operations. ~~Success~~Despite ina ~~retaining~~challenging ~~customers~~housing ismarket ~~driven in part by our discipline in acquiring new customers with acceptable credit backgrounds~~ and bygenerally ~~providing~~weak ~~high~~economic ~~quality equipment~~conditions, ~~installation,~~ ~~monitoring,~~our ~~and~~ending ~~customer~~subscriber ~~service.~~base Wehas ~~are,~~continued ~~however,~~to ~~affected~~grow byas ~~the~~presented ~~economic slowdown and expect our disconnect rate~~ in the ~~near~~table ~~term~~on topage ~~continue at an elevated rate relative to our historical disconnect experience~~17.

~~Subscriber~~Customer ~~disconnects~~Retention ~~stem~~— ~~from~~Success ~~three~~of ~~primary~~our ~~sources~~economic ~~including~~model ~~account~~is ~~write-offs,~~highly ~~household~~dependent ~~and~~on ~~business~~customer ~~moves,~~retention. ~~and~~We ~~disconnects~~believe ~~due~~our todisconnect ~~customer initiated~~rate ~~cancellations~~is ~~for~~the ~~reasons~~lowest ~~other~~among ~~than~~the ~~moves~~major monitored security service companies. ~~Another~~Our ~~factor~~low ~~that~~disconnect ~~can~~rate ~~from~~is ~~time~~driven toin ~~time~~part ~~increase~~by ~~the~~our ~~disconnect~~discipline ~~rate~~in isacquiring ~~cancellation~~new ofcustomers ~~multi-family~~with ~~contracts,~~acceptable ascredit ~~they~~backgrounds ~~can~~and ~~contain~~by ~~numerous~~providing ~~individually~~high ~~monitored~~quality equipment, installation, monitoring, and~~/or~~ ~~revenue-producing~~customer ~~sites~~service.

15Subscriber disconnects stem from three primary sources including account write-offs, household and business moves, and

~~Profit from Recurring Services — Profit from recurring services reflects the~~ ~~monthly~~disconnects ~~monitoring~~due ~~and~~to ~~service~~customer ~~fees~~initiated generated from the existing subscriber base, including the amortization of deferred revenues, net of general and administrative expenses, including royalty expense. Non-cash impairment charges resulting from subscriber contract cancellations ~~and~~for ~~depreciation~~reasons ~~and~~other ~~amortization~~than ~~expenses, including the amortization of deferred subscriber acquisition costs, are also charged to recurring services~~moves. ~~Profit~~ ~~from~~Another ~~recurring~~factor ~~services~~that iscan affected by the size of the subscriber base, the amount of operational costs, depreciation, the level of subscriber cancellations, and changes in the average monthly monitoring fee per subscriber. Profit from ~~recurring~~time ~~services is considered~~ to betime anincrease ~~important non-GAAP component of our operating profit. This component of operating profit allows investors and others to understand~~ the ~~amount~~disconnect ofrate ~~operating~~is ~~income~~cancellation ~~generated from active security systems. See the “Reconciliation~~ of ~~Non~~multi-~~GAAP~~family contracts, ~~Measures”~~as ~~section~~they ~~for~~can ~~the~~contain ~~reconciliation~~numerous ofindividual ~~profit~~subscriber ~~from recurring services to its closest GAAP counterpart, operating profit~~sites.

~~Investment~~Profit infrom ~~New~~Recurring ~~Subscribers~~Services — ~~Investment~~Profit infrom ~~new~~recurring services ~~subscribers~~reflects is the ~~net~~monthly ~~expense~~monitoring ~~incurred~~and toservice ~~add~~fees togenerated from the existing subscriber base ~~every year~~, ~~which~~including isthe ~~primarily~~amortization ~~marketing~~of ~~and~~deferred ~~selling expenses including Brand Introduction costs~~revenues, ~~after capitalization~~net of ~~the~~general ~~security system assets~~ and ~~after~~administrative ~~deferral~~expenses, ofincluding ~~subscriber~~royalty ~~installation~~expense. ~~fees~~This ~~and~~measure ~~selling~~excludes ~~expense~~the results ~~directly~~of operations related to ~~installations. The amount of the~~ investment in new subscribers, ~~charged~~a toseparate ~~income~~non-GAAP ~~may~~measure bedefined ~~influenced~~below. byNon-cash ~~several factors,~~impairment ~~including~~charges ~~the~~resulting ~~growth~~from ~~rate~~subscriber ofcontract ~~new~~cancellations ~~subscriber~~and ~~installations~~depreciation and ~~the~~amortization ~~level~~expenses, ofincluding ~~costs~~the amortization ~~incurred~~of todeferred ~~attract~~subscriber ~~new~~acquisition ~~subscribers~~costs, ~~which~~are ~~can~~also ~~vary~~charged byto ~~customer~~recurring ~~acquisition channel~~services. As aProfit ~~result,~~from ~~increases~~recurring inservices ~~the~~is ~~rate~~affected ofby ~~investment (~~the ~~addition~~size of ~~new subscribers)~~the ~~may~~subscriber ~~have~~base, athe ~~negative~~amount ~~effect~~of onoperational ~~current~~costs, ~~operating profit~~depreciation, ~~but~~the alevel ~~positive~~of ~~impact~~subscriber cancellations, onand ~~long-term~~changes ~~operating~~in ~~profit,~~the ~~cash~~average ~~flow,~~monthly ~~and~~monitoring ~~economic~~fee ~~value~~per subscriber. ~~Investment~~ inProfit ~~new~~from ~~subscribers~~recurring services is considered to be an important non-GAAP component of our operating profit. This component of operating profit allows investors and others to understand the amount of ~~net~~operating ~~expenses~~income ~~associated~~generated ~~with~~from ~~the~~active ~~installation~~security ~~of new subscribers~~systems. See the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for the reconciliation of ~~investment~~profit infrom ~~new~~recurring ~~subscribers~~services to its closest GAAP counterpart, ~~operating profit~~net income.

~~Key~~Investment ~~Cash~~in ~~Flow~~New ~~Measures~~Subscribers — Investment in new subscribers is the net expense incurred to add to the subscriber base every year, which is primarily marketing and selling expenses including Brand Introduction costs, net of security system asset capitalization, and net of sales acquisition cost deferrals. The amount of the investment in new subscribers charged to income may be influenced by several factors, including the volume of new subscriber installations and the level of costs incurred to attract new subscribers, which can vary by customer acquisition channel. As a result, increases in the rate of investment (the addition of new subscribers) may have a negative effect on current operating profit, but a positive impact on long-term operating profit, cash flow, and economic value. Investment in new subscribers is considered to be an important non-GAAP component of our operating profit. This component of operating profit allows investors and others to understand the amount of net expenses associated with the installation of new subscribers. See the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for the reconciliation of investment in new subscribers to its closest GAAP counterpart, net income.

~~Adjusted~~ EBITDA from Recurring Services — ~~Adjusted~~ EBITDA from recurring services is a non-GAAP measure that we use to convey profits generated from the subscriber base adjusted for certain non-cash items including asset impairment charges, depreciation of fixed assets, amortization of deferred charges, and amortization of deferred revenue. We believe ~~adjusted~~ EBITDA from ~~recurring~~Recurring ~~services~~Services is useful to provide investors with information about ~~adjusted~~operating profits, ~~and~~adjusted for significant non-cash ~~flows~~items, generated from the existing customer base, ~~that~~which ~~are~~can ~~available~~be toused ~~reinvest in the business or distribute~~ to ~~shareholders.~~support ~~In deriving this non-GAAP measure, we reflect~~ the ~~go-forward~~investment ~~1.25% royalty rate~~ in ~~adjusted~~new ~~EBITDA~~subscribers ~~from~~portion ~~recurring~~of ~~services~~our ~~for all periods presented~~operations. ~~Historically, we paid our former parent company a royalty of 7% on revenues in the United States and~~This 3%measure onexcludes ~~revenues in Canada. On November 1, 2008,~~ the ~~royalty~~results ~~rate changed to approximately 1.25%~~ of ~~revenues~~operations ~~and~~related ~~will continue~~ to beinvestment ~~calculated~~in onnew ~~that~~subscribers, ~~basis~~a ~~until~~separate ~~the~~non-GAAP ~~earlier~~measure ofdefined ~~when we cease to use certain BCO trademarks or the expiration of the license agreement on October 31, 2011~~above. See the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for the reconciliation of ~~adjusted~~ EBITDA from recurring services to its closest GAAP counterpart, ~~operating~~net ~~profit~~income.

Adjusted Cash Invested in New Subscribers — Adjusted cash invested in new subscribers is a non-GAAP measure that we use to convey the total cash invested to acquire new subscribers ~~and~~or ~~make~~move ~~additional investments, as necessary, in~~ existing subscribers, without regard to the accounting treatment of the various cash components. It is comprised of primarily ~~capitalized~~ capitalized security system costs, marketing and selling expenses, and deferred subscriber acquisition costs (current year payments) less deferred revenue from new subscribers (current year receipts). This measure is adjusted to exclude costs related to the Brand Introduction. See the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for the reconciliation of adjusted cash ~~investment~~invested in new subscribers to its closest GAAP counterpart, ~~operating~~net ~~profit~~income.

1614

Summary of Operating Results and Key Performance Indicators ~~and Cash Flow Measures~~

($ in millions, except EPS, disconnect rate, subscriber growth rate, and subscriber data)

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	2010			2009
Revenues	$	~~143~~146.75		$	~~135~~136.40		$	~~419.7~~		$	~~397.1~~
Cost of revenues		7167.76			7665.32			~~204.8~~			~~219.1~~
Selling, general and administrative expenses		5150.32			3645.95			~~142.2~~			~~109.7~~
Total costs and expenses		~~123~~117.08			~~113~~110.27			~~347.0~~			~~328.8~~
Other operating income, net		0.6			0.6			1.2			1.0
Other operating income (expense), net		0.2			(0.2	)
Operating profit		2128.39			2225.81			~~73.9~~			~~69.3~~
Interest expense, net		—			0.2			0.1			0.6
Interest income, net		—			0.1
Income before income taxes		2128.39			2225.62			~~73.8~~			~~68.7~~
Income tax expense		811.24			810.60			~~28.9~~			~~26.4~~
Net income	$	1317.15		$	1415.02		$	~~44.9~~		$	~~42.3~~
Diluted EPS	$	0.2838		$	0.3033		$	~~0.98~~		$	~~0.92~~
Weighted average shares assuming dilution(1)		46.1			45.9			46.0			45.9
Weighted average shares assuming dilution(a)		46.3			45.9
Key Performance Indicators
Monthly recurring revenue(2)							$	43.4		$	39.8
Monthly recurring revenue(b)		44.8			41.5
Subscriber growth
Ending number of subscribers (in thousands)		1,369.4			1,321.3			~~1,348.1~~			~~1,285.3~~
Ending subscriber base growth (percentage)(3)								4.9			7.1
Ending subscriber base growth (percentage)(c)		3.6			5.7
Average number of subscribers (in thousands)		1,~~342~~364.61			1,~~279~~310.18			~~1,328.1~~			~~1,259.0~~
Average subscriber growth rate (percentage)		54.01			76.70			~~5.5~~			~~8.2~~
Customer retention
Disconnect rate (percentage)(4)		9.4			9.0			8.1			7.4
Disconnect rate (percentage)(d)		7.3			7.1
Profit from recurring services(5)	$	59.0		$	47.4		$	165.9		$	145.4
Profit from recurring services(e)	$	59.5		$	51.5
Investment in new subscribers(6)	$	(37.7	)	$	(24.6	)	$	(92.0	)	$	(76.1	)
Investment in new subscribers(f)	$	(30.6	)	$	(26.4	)
Key Cash Flow Measures
EBITDA from recurring services(g)	$	89.2		$	78.4
Adjusted EBITDA from recurring services (using 1.25% royalty rate)(7)	$	90.5		$	81.9		$	252.9		$	239.7
Adjusted cash invested in new subscribers(h)	$	(59.0	)	$	(62.8	)
Adjusted cash invested in new subscribers(8)	$	(67.3	)	$	(62.0	)	$	(195.0	)	$	(187.6	)

(1a) See Note 109 – Earnings per Share for explanation of the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

(2b) Monthly recurring revenue (“MRR”), a non-GAAP measure, is calculated based on the number of subscribers at period end multiplied by the average fee per subscriber earned in the last month of the period for contractual monitoring and maintenance services. This measure is reconciled below under the caption “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures.”

(3c) Calculated based on period ending subscribers.

(4d) Calculated as a ratio, the numerator of which is customer cancellations, on an annualized basis, and the denominator of which is the average number of customers during the period. Customer relocations, reactivations, and dealer charge backs of contract cancellations are excluded from the calculation.

(5e) Profit from recurring services, a non-GAAP measure, reflects operating profit generated from the existing subscriber base including the amortization of deferred revenues, and deferred acquisition costs as these amounts are recognized over time and are unrelated to generating new subscribers in the current period as discussed under the caption “Key Performance Measures — Profit from Recurring Services.” This measure is reconciled below in the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section.

(6f) Investment in new subscribers, a non-GAAP measure, is net expense (primarily marketing and selling expenses, including Brand Introduction costs) incurred to add new subscribers to the subscriber base as discussed under the caption “Key Performance Measures — Investment in New Subscribers.” This measure is reconciled below in the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section.

(7g) ~~Adjusted~~ EBITDA from recurring services, is a non-GAAP measure, isthat ~~calculated~~we asuse ifto ~~the~~convey ~~royalty~~profits ~~rate~~generated ~~had~~from ~~been~~the ~~approximately~~subscriber ~~1.25%~~base ofadjusted ~~revenues~~ for ~~all~~certain ~~periods~~non-cash ~~presented.~~items ~~The~~including ~~royalty~~asset ~~rate~~impairment ~~will~~charges, ~~remain~~depreciation ~~at approximately 1.25%~~ of ~~revenues~~fixed ~~until~~assets, ~~the~~amortization ~~earlier~~ of ~~when~~deferred wecharges, ~~cease~~and toamortization ~~use~~ of ~~certain~~deferred ~~BCO trademarks or the expiration of the license agreement on October 31, 2011~~revenue. This measure is reconciled below in the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section.

(8h) Adjusted cash invested in new subscribers, a non-GAAP measure, represents cash used to acquire new subscribers during the period and excludes costs related to the Brand Introduction. This measure is reconciled below in the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section.

1715

Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 compared to the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2008~~ 2009

Revenues

Revenues increased $810.35 million or 67.17% to $~~143~~146.75 million in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $~~135~~136.40 million in the comparable prior period. ~~Revenues increased $22.6 million or 5.7% to $419.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $397.1 million in the comparable prior period.~~ The increase was primarily due to 54.01% ~~and 5.5%~~ growth in the average subscriber base ~~for the three~~ and ~~nine~~a ~~month periods, respectively~~4.2% ~~Additionally,~~increase in MRR per ending subscriber ~~increased 4.0%~~ over the comparable prior period end. These increases were partially offset by a decline in pre-wire and trim-out revenues from our new housing construction customer acquisition channel (“Builder”), formerly referred to as Brink’s Home Technologies.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues ~~decreased~~increased $42.64 million or 63.07% to $7167.76 million in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $7665.32 million in the comparable prior period. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~due~~ primarily todue ~~the decline in the royalty rate from approximately 7% of revenues in 2008,~~ to ~~approximately 1.25% of revenues in the same period of 2009, resulting in a reduction of royalty expense of~~ $~~7.8 million for the three months ended 2009. Additionally, cost of revenues declined approximately $~~1.65 million ~~due to lower expenses stemming from lower levels of activity in the Builder channel. These increases were partially offset primarily by a $2.3 million~~ increase in impairment charges related to subscriber disconnects and an increase in costs to support the larger subscriber base. Cost of revenues was 4946.91% of revenues in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and 5647.49% in the comparable prior period. Had the royalty rate been approximately 1.25% of revenues in the comparable prior period, cost of revenues would have been $68.5 million or 50.6% of revenues. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of the royalty rate on cost of revenues.

Cost of revenues decreased $14.3 million or 6.5% to $204.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $219.1 million in the comparable prior period. The decrease was due primarily to the decline in the royalty rate from approximately 7% of revenues in 2008 to approximately 1.25% of revenues in the same period of 2009, resulting in a reduction of royalty expense of $22.4 million for the nine months ended 2009. Additionally, cost of revenues declined approximately $6.0 million due to lower expenses stemming from lower levels of activity in the Builder channel. This was partially offset in the period primarily by a $5.8 million increase in impairment charges related to subscriber disconnects and an increase in costs to support the larger subscriber base. Cost of revenues was 48.8% of revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 55.2% in the comparable prior period. Had the royalty rate been approximately 1.25% of revenues in the comparable prior period in 2008, cost of revenues would have been $196.7 million or 49.5% of revenues. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of the royalty rate on cost of revenues.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased by $~~14.~~4.7 million or 3910.03% to $5150.32 million in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $3645.95 million in the comparable prior period. The increase was primarily due to $~~10.~~6.8 million ofincrease in Brand Introduction costs, and incremental costs to support the larger subscriber base~~, and increased general advertising, selling, and account servicing costs~~. These increases were partially offset by a $14.20 million ~~favorable~~unfavorable adjustment to the legal contingency accrual in the prior period (see Note 98 – Commitments and Contingencies for further discussion). SG&A was 3534.73% of revenues in the three months ended March 31, of2010 ~~2009~~ and 2733.35% in the prior comparable period. Excluding Brand Introduction costs, SG&A would have been $4042.73 million and $44.4 million or 28.39% and 32.6% of revenues in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of Brand Introduction costs on operating profit.

SG&A increased by $32.5 million or 29.6% to $142.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $109.7 million in the comparable prior period. The increase was primarily due to $13.9 million expense related to Brand Introduction costs, $4.0 million incremental litigation expense, incremental costs to support the larger subscriber base, and increased general advertising, selling, and account servicing costs. SG&A was 33.9% of revenues in the nine months ended of 2009 and 27.6% in the prior comparable period. Excluding Brand Introduction costs, SG&A would have been $128.3 or 30.6% of revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of Brand Introduction costs on operating profit.

Operating Profit

Operating profit increased ~~decreased~~ $13.58 million or 615.61% to $2128.39 million in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $2225.81 million in the prior comparable period, driven primarily by ~~Brand~~higher ~~Introduction costs~~profits ~~and~~from ~~increased~~recurring ~~impairment~~services ~~charges~~on ~~related~~our tolarger ~~customer~~subscriber ~~disconnects,~~base ~~which~~and ~~were~~an unfavorable ~~partially~~adjustment ~~offset~~to ~~primarily~~the bylegal ~~the~~contingency ~~decrease~~accrual in the ~~royalty~~prior ~~rate,~~period. aThese ~~favorable~~increases ~~adjustment~~in tooperating ~~the~~profit ~~legal~~were ~~contingency~~partially ~~accrual,~~offset ~~and~~by ~~higher~~increased ~~profits~~Brand ~~from~~Introduction ~~recurring services on our larger subscriber base~~costs. Operating margin was 1419.87% in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~ 2010 compared to 1618.85% in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2008~~2009. Excluding Brand Introduction costs, operating profit would have been $3136.~~9 or~~8 22million and $26.2 million or 25.1% and 19.3% of revenue for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009.~~2010 ~~Had the royalty rate been approximately 1.25% of revenues in 2008~~and 2009, ~~operating profit in the third quarter of 2008 would have been $30~~respectively.6 ~~million, or 22.6% operating margin.~~ Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of ~~the royalty rate change and~~ Brand Introduction costs on operating profit.

Operating profit increased $4.6 million or 6.6% to $73.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $69.3 million in the prior comparable period, driven primarily by the decrease in the royalty rate and higher profits from recurring services on our larger subscriber base. These improvements were partially offset primarily by Brand Introduction costs, higher litigation expense, and increased impairment charges related to customer disconnects. Operating margin was 17.6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 17.5% in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Excluding Brand Introduction costs, operating profit would have been $87.8 or 20.9% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Had the royalty rate been approximately 1.25% of revenues in 2008, operating profit in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would have been $91.7 million, or 23.1% operating margin. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of the royalty rate change and Brand Introduction costs on operating profit.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes in the three months ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 ~~decreased~~increased by $01.4 million to $811.24 million from $810.60 million as compared to the prior year comparable period. The change is due to the ~~decrease~~increase in income before income taxes, partially offset by ana ~~increase~~decrease in the effective tax rate to 3839.54% in the current quarter from 3839.07% in the prior comparable period.

Provision for income taxes increased by $2.5 million to $28.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $26.4 million in the prior comparable period. The change is due to growth in income before income taxes and an increase in the effective tax rate to 39.2% from 38.4% in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase primarily reflects an increase in unfavorable permanent tax adjustments related to brand development costs.

Net Income and Earnings Per Share

In the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, we reported net income of $1317.15 million, or $0.2838 per diluted share, compared to $1415.02 million, or $0.3033 per ~~pro~~diluted ~~forma~~ share, for the prior comparable period. As previously discussed, in the ~~three~~increase ~~months~~was ~~ended~~primarily ~~September 30,~~due ~~2009~~to wehigher ~~incurred~~net ~~Brand Introduction~~profit ~~costs~~from ~~and~~the ~~increased~~larger ~~impairment costs related to~~ subscriber ~~disconnects.~~base ~~These~~and ~~decreases~~an ~~were~~unfavorable ~~partially~~adjustment ~~offset~~to by the ~~decrease~~legal contingency accrual in ~~royalty expense, higher net profit from~~ the ~~larger~~prior ~~subscriber~~period. ~~base~~These ~~and~~increases awere ~~favorable~~partially ~~adjustment~~offset toby ~~the~~increased ~~legal contingency~~Brand ~~accrual~~Introduction costs. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of ~~the royalty rate change and the~~ Brand Introduction costs on net income.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we reported net income of $44.9 million, or $0.98 per diluted share, compared to $42.3 million, or $0.92 per pro forma share, for the prior comparable period. As previously discussed, the nine months ended September 30, 2009 benefited from the decrease in the royalty expense and higher net profit from the larger subscriber base which were partially offset by Brand Introduction costs, increased litigation expense, and increased impairment costs related to subscriber disconnects. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased $8.9 million, net of tax, due to Brand Introduction costs. The impact on diluted earnings per share was $0.19. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” section for further analysis on the impact of the royalty rate change and the Brand Introduction costs on net income.

We believe that operating profit will continue to be impacted by higher costs, primarily marketing in nature, incurred in the Brand Introduction. Total Brand Introduction expenses, including marketing and other conversion costs, during 2009 are expected to range between $21 and $24 million. We spent $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2009, $2.2 million in the second quarter and $10.6 million in the third quarter on the Brand Introduction. We currently estimate that total costs of the Brand Introduction effort in the first half of 2009 and across the 24-month to 36-month period that began on July 1, 2009 will range

from $60 million to $90 million on a pre-tax basis. The actual level of spending could increase or decrease depending on how quickly we are able to build brand recognition and our ability to attract new subscribers through our marketing efforts. Notwithstanding the $21 to $24 million of anticipated expense for the Brand Introduction, we expect that operating profit for 2009 will increase from the $94.0 million in operating profit we generated in 2008. We expect that the Brand Introduction costs will be funded from existing cash balances and future cash flows from operations. See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section for further discussion.

Monthly Recurring Revenue

MRR increased $3.63 million or 98.0% as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from the prior comparable period end primarily as the result of ~~the~~a 43.96% increase in the size of the ending subscriber base and a 4.02% increase in average recurring revenue per ending subscriber. The increase in MRR per subscriber is due to adding new subscribers at higher monthly monitoring rates, price increases, disconnecting customers having generally lower monthly recurring rates, and growth in additional chargeable services provided to both new and existing subscribers. ~~We expect that MRR growth will continue to exceed subscriber base growth in the near term.~~

Subscriber Growth

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, the subscriber base grew by 10,~~100~~400 ~~and 46,500~~ subscribers, ~~respectively,~~ achieving ending subscriber growth of 43.96% asover ~~compared to~~ the prior comparable period ending subscriber base. The subscriber base grew across most customer acquisition channels, with growth highest in the authorized dealer subscriber acquisition channel. ~~While~~ housing and overall market conditions are expected to remain challenging through the remainder of 2009 and into 2010, various operational initiatives are in place which we believe will continue to build our commercial and residential alarm installation and monitoring business. We believe installations will continue to exceed disconnects, leading to sustained subscriber growth in the mid-single digit range in the near term.

Disconnect Rate

The annualized disconnect rate for the three months ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 increased to 97.43% from 97.01% in the comparable prior period, driven primarily by an increase in customer requested cancellations, ~~with~~and ~~the most significant increase in customers indicating cancellation for financial reasons. The increase in~~ customer ~~requested~~moves, ~~cancellations~~partially ~~was~~offset ~~more~~by ~~pronounced~~a indecrease ~~the first half of the quarter. An increase~~ in customer disconnects ~~resulting~~associated ~~from~~with account write-offs. ~~was~~The ~~offset~~disconnect byrate acalculated ~~decrease~~on ina ~~disconnects~~trailing ~~associated~~twelve ~~with~~month ~~household~~basis ~~moves during~~as ~~the~~of ~~third~~March 31, ~~quarter~~2010 ofwas ~~2009~~8.2% ~~relative~~compared to ~~the prior comparable period~~7.8% ~~Multi-family~~calculated ~~disconnects~~on ~~were not~~ a ~~significant~~comparable ~~driver~~basis offor ~~disconnect activity in~~ the ~~current~~prior year period.

The disconnect rate calculated on a trailing twelve month basis as of September 30, 2009 was 8.1% compared to 7.3% calculated on a comparable basis for the prior year period. We continue to manage the disconnect rate by closely monitoring and adhering to established subscriber selection and retention processes. The disconnect rate may continue to increase in the near future due to factors beyond our control, including ongoing weakness in the economy and housing markets. We estimate that the full year disconnect rate for 2009 will range between 8.0% and 8.2% compared to the 7.5% full year rate for 2008.

Profit from Recurring Services

Profit from recurring services increased $118.60 million or 24 15.5% to $59.05 million during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $4751.45 million in the comparable prior period. The increase was due primarily to ~~the decrease in the royalty rate of $6.8 million and~~ higher net profits from our larger subscriber base, ~~partially~~and ~~offset~~an byunfavorable ~~increased~~adjustment ~~impairment~~to ~~costs~~the legal accrual in the prior period.

Profit from recurring services increased $20.5 million or 14.1% to $165.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $145.4 million in the comparable prior period. The increase was due primarily to the decrease in the royalty rate of $19.5 million and higher net profits from our larger subscriber base, partially offset by higher litigation expense and higher impairment charges related to customer disconnects.

Investment in New Subscribers

Investment in new subscribers increased $134.12 million to $~~37.7 million in the three months ended September~~ 30~~, 2009 from $24~~.6 million infor the ~~prior~~three ~~year comparable period and increased $15.9 million to $92.0 million in the nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $7626.14 million in the prior year comparable period. The ~~increases~~increase ~~were~~was primarily the result of $~~10.~~6 ~~million and $13~~.98 million ~~incurred~~additional ~~for the~~ Brand Introduction ~~during~~costs for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009,~~2010 ~~respectively,~~compared ~~and~~to ~~increased~~the ~~general~~prior ~~advertising and selling costs~~period.

20EBITDA from Recurring Services

~~Table~~EBITDA from recurring services increased $10.8 million or 13.8% to $89.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $78.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily the result of ~~Contents~~subscriber base growth, higher monthly recurring revenue and lower legal expense.

Adjusted EBITDA from Recurring Services

Adjusted EBITDA from recurring services increased $8.6 million or 10.5% to $90.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $81.9 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily the result of subscriber base growth and higher monthly recurring revenue.

Adjusted EBITDA from recurring services increased $13.2 million or 5.5% to $252.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $239.7 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily the result of subscriber base growth and higher monthly recurring revenue, partially offset by higher litigation expense.

Adjusted Cash Invested in New Subscribers

Adjusted cash invested in new subscribers ~~increased~~decreased $5.3.8 million or 86.51% to $6759.30 million in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $62.~~0 million~~8 million in the prior year comparable period. ~~Adjusted~~The ~~cash~~decrease ~~invested~~was inprimarily ~~new~~due ~~subscribers~~to ~~increased~~an $718.~~4 million or 3.9~~1% todecrease ~~$195.0 million~~ in the ~~nine~~number ~~months~~of ~~ended~~installations ~~September 30,~~over ~~2009 from $187.6 million in the~~ prior ~~year comparable~~ period. ~~These increases~~This ~~were~~decrease ~~primarily~~was ~~due~~partially tooffset ~~increased~~by ~~advertising and selling costs,~~ higher materials costs, and an increase in ~~the average~~ cost of accounts acquired from our authorized dealers. Materials costs increased due primarily to an increase in the installation of wireless product. ~~We anticipate that this additional investment will be recovered through profit from recurring services.~~

Subscriber Activity

Three Months EndedSeptember 30,

%Change

Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,

%Change

Three Months EndedMarch 31,

%Change

(Subscriber activity in thousands)

~~2009~~2010

~~2008~~2009

~~2009~~

~~2008~~

Number of subscribers:

Beginning of period

1,~~338~~359.0

1,~~271~~301.56

54.24

~~1,301.6~~

~~1,223.9~~

~~6.3~~

Installations(a)

4135.82

4243.70

(218.1

)

~~127.5~~

~~131.5~~

~~(3.0~~

)

Disconnects(a),(b)

(3124.78

)

(2823.93

)

96.74

~~(81.0~~

)

~~(70.1~~

)

~~15.5~~

End of period

1,~~348~~369.14

1,~~285~~321.3

43.96

~~1,348.1~~

~~1,285.3~~

~~4.9~~

Average number of subscribers

1,~~342~~364.61

1,~~279~~310.18

54.01

~~1,328.1~~

~~1,259.0~~

~~5.5~~

Annualized disconnect rate(c)

97.43

97.01

~~8.1~~

~~7.4~~

Disconnect rate, excluding multifamily disconnects(d)

97.3

87.51

~~8.1~~

~~7.1~~

Twelve month trailing disconnect rate (e)

8.2

7.8

~~8.1~~

~~7.3~~

(a) Customers who move from one location and then initiate a new monitoring agreement at a new location, totaling 64,~~200~~600 and 64,~~400~~500 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008, respectively, and 15,800 and 17,900 for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2009 ~~and 2008~~, respectively, are not included in either installations or disconnects. Dealer accounts cancelled and charged back to the dealer during the specified contract term are excluded from installations and disconnects.

(b) Inactive sites that are returned to active service, which we call system takeovers, reduce disconnects and were 76,~~400~~100 and 75,~~000~~900 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008, respectively, and 19,900 and 19,800 for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2009 ~~and 2008~~, respectively.

(c) The annualized disconnect rate is a ratio. The numerator is the number of customer cancellations during the period multiplied by the appropriate ratio for the three ~~and nine~~ month ~~periods~~period. The denominator is the average number of customers during the period. The gross number of customer cancellations is reduced for customers who move from one location and then initiate a new monitoring agreement at a new location, disconnected ~~accounts charged back to the dealers because the customers cancelled service during the specified contractual term, and inactive sites that are returned to active service during the period.~~

accounts charged back to the dealers because the customers cancelled service during the specified contractual term, and inactive sites that are returned to active service during the period.

(d)	Disconnect rate as defined in Note (c), excluding multifamily account cancellations.

(e)	Twelve month trailing disconnect rate is a ratio. The numerator is the aggregate number of net customer cancellations during the preceding four fiscal quarters, including multi-family account cancellations, and the denominator is the average number of customers during the same period.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures

Operating Results Adjusted for Brand Introduction Costs ~~and Royalty Rate~~

Our results of operations include costs related to our Brand Introduction and royalty expense that is charged to us by BCO for the use of certain trademarks. The rate utilized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately 7% of revenues in the United States and 3% of revenues outside of the United States. However, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 the rate used was approximately 1.25% of revenues for both within and outside the United States. For comparability of financial results, we present operating results adjusted by Brand Introduction costs ~~and the 1.25% royalty rate~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2008~~2010 and 2009. This supplemental non-GAAP information should be reviewed in conjunction with our historical condensed consolidated statements of income.

21The table below reconciles operating results adjusted by Brand Introduction costs to GAAP operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In millions, except EPS)	2010			2009
Non-GAAP Operating Profit	$	36.8		$	26.2
Brand Introduction		(7.9	)		(1.1	)

GAAP Operating Profit	$	28.9		$	25.1

Non-GAAP Net Income	$	22.3		$	15.9
Brand Introduction		(7.9	)		(1.1	)
Tax effect of adjustments		3.1			0.4

GAAP Net Income	$	17.5		$	15.2

Non-GAAP Earnings per share — diluted	$	0.48		$	0.35
Brand Introduction		(0.17	)		(0.02	)
Tax effect of adjustments		0.07			—

GAAP earnings per share — diluted	$	0.38		$	0.33

The table below reconciles operating results adjusted by the 1.25% royalty rate and Brand Introduction costs to GAAP operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
(In millions, except EPS)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Non-GAAP Operating Profit	$	31.9		$	30.6		$	87.8		$	91.7
Brand Introduction		(10.6	)		—			(13.9	)		—
Adjustment to royalty rate		—			(7.8	)		—			(22.4	)
GAAP Operating Profit	$	21.3		$	22.8		$	73.9		$	69.3
Non-GAAP Net Income	$	19.6		$	18.8		$	53.8		$	56.1
Brand Introduction		(10.6	)		—			(13.9	)		—
Adjustment to royalty rate		—			(7.8	)		—			(22.4	)
Tax effect of adjustments		4.1			3.0			5.0			8.6
GAAP Net Income	$	13.1		$	14.0		$	44.9		$	42.3
Non-GAAP Earnings per share — diluted	$	0.42		$	0.40		$	1.17		$	1.22
Brand Introduction		(0.23	)		—			(0.30	)		—
Adjustment to royalty rate		—			(0.17	)		—			(0.49	)
Tax effect of adjustments		0.09			0.07			0.11			0.19
GAAP earnings per share — diluted	$	0.28		$	0.30		$	0.98		$	0.92

Monthly Recurring Revenues

MRR is a non-GAAP measure used to evaluate performance. We believe the presentation of MRR is useful to investors because the measure is widely used in the industry to assess the amount of recurring revenues from subscriber, monitoring, and other service fees. This supplemental non-GAAP information should be reviewed in conjunction with our historical consolidated statements of income.

The table below reconciles monthly recurring revenues, a non-GAAP measure, to revenues, its closest GAAP counterpart.

	Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	March 31,
(In millions)	~~2009~~2010		~~2008~~2009
Monthly recurring revenues (“MRR”)(a)	$	4344.48	$	3941.85
Amounts excluded from MRR:
Amortization of deferred revenue(b)		3.3		3.42
Other revenues(c)		1.2		21.0
Revenues on a GAAP basis:
September		47.9		45.2
March		49.3		45.7
January — August		371.8		351.9
January — February		97.2		90.3
Reported GAAP January — September Revenue	$	419.7	$	397.1
Reported GAAP January — March Revenue	$	146.5	$	136.0

(a)	MRR is calculated based on the number of subscribers at period end multiplied by the average fee per subscriber received in the last month of the period for contracted monitoring and maintenance services.

(b)	Includes amortization of deferred revenue related to active subscriber accounts and recognition of deferred revenue related to subscriber accounts that disconnect.

(c) Other revenues are not pursuant to monthly contractual billings, including but not limited to revenue from commercial product sales, on-call service revenue, and pre-wire and trim-out revenue from the Builder channel. Other revenues also include terminated contract penalty billings for breached contracts, pass-through revenue (alarm permit fees, false alarm fines, etc.), and partial month revenues recognized from customers who disconnected during the last month of the period and are therefore not included in MRR. This amount is reduced for adjustments recorded against revenue (primarily customer goodwill credits and other billing adjustments), and for the amount included in MRR for new customers added during the last month of the period for those portions of the month for which revenues were not recognized for such customers.

during the last month of the period and are therefore not included in MRR. This amount is reduced for adjustments recorded against revenue (primarily customer goodwill credits and other billing adjustments), and for the amount included in MRR for new customers added during the last month of the period for those portions of the month for which revenues were not recognized for such customers.

Profit from Recurring Services and Investment in New Subscribers

Profit from recurring services and investment in new subscribers are non-GAAP measures used to evaluate performance. We believe the presentation of these measures is useful to investors as ~~they reflect~~it reflects the ongoing profit generated from the subscriber base and the net expenses incurred to acquire new subscribers. This supplemental non-GAAP information should be reviewed in conjunction with our historical consolidated statements of income.

22The table below reconciles profit from recurring services and investment in new subscribers for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, to net income, their closest GAAP counterpart.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In millions)	2010			2009
Profit from recurring services^(a)	$	59.5		$	51.5
Investment in new subscribers^(b)		(30.6	)		(26.4	)
Interest income, net		—			0.1
Provision for income taxes		(11.4	)		(10.0	)

Net income	$	17.5		$	15.2

(a)	Reflects operating profit generated from the existing subscriber base including the amortization of deferred revenues and deferred acquisition costs as these amounts are recognized over time and are unrelated to generating new subscribers in the current period.

(b)

Primarily marketing and selling expenses including the Brand Introduction costs of $7.9 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, net of the deferral of subscriber acquisition costs (primarily a portion of sales commissions and related costs) incurred in the acquisition of new subscribers. This metric also includes operating expenses related to our new housing construction customer acquisition channel (“Builder”), formerly referred to as Brink’s Home Technologies.

EBITDA from Recurring Services and Adjusted Cash Invested in New Subscribers

EBITDA from recurring services and adjusted cash invested in new subscribers are measures used to monitor our operating performance. This supplemental non-GAAP information should be reviewed in conjunction with our historical consolidated statements of income and cash flow.

The table below reconciles EBITDA from recurring services and adjusted cash invested in new subscribers for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, to net income, their closest GAAP counterpart.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In millions)	2010			2009
EBITDA from recurring services	$	89.2		$	78.4
Depreciation and amortization		(23.7	)		(22.2	)
Impairment charges from subscriber disconnects		(15.5	)		(14.0	)
Amortization of deferred revenue		9.5			9.3

Profit from recurring services		59.5			51.5

Adjusted cash invested in new subscribers		(59.0	)		(62.8	)
Deferred revenue from new subscribers (current year receipts)		(8.6	)		(10.3	)
Deferred subscriber acquisition costs (current year payments)		4.9			5.5
Security system capital expenditures^(a)		40.0			42.3
Brand Introduction^(b)		(7.9	)		(1.1	)

Investment in new subscribers		(30.6	)		(26.4	)

Interest income (expense)		—			0.1
Provision for income taxes		(11.4	)		(10.0	)

Net income	$	17.5		$	15.2

(a)	Amount excludes non-security system capital expenditures of $2.1 million and $4.9 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(b)	Brand Introduction expenses are excluded from adjusted cash invested in new subscribers.

The table below reconciles profit from recurring services and investment in new subscribers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, to operating profit, their closest GAAP counterpart.

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
(In millions)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Profit from recurring services(a)	$	59.0		$	47.4		$	165.9		$	145.4
Investment in new subscribers(b)		(37.7	)		(24.6	)		(92.0	)		(76.1	)
Operating profit	$	21.3		$	22.8		$	73.9		$	69.3

(a) Reflects operating profit generated from the existing subscriber base including the amortization of deferred revenues.

(b) Primarily marketing and selling expenses including the Brand Introduction costs of $10.6 million and $13.9 million for the three and nine months ended 2009, respectively, net of the deferral of subscriber acquisition costs (primarily a portion of sales commissions and related costs) incurred in the acquisition of new subscribers. This metric also includes operating expenses related to the Builder channel.

Adjusted EBITDA from Recurring Services and Adjusted Cash Invested in New Subscribers

Adjusted EBITDA from recurring services and adjusted cash invested in new subscribers are measures used to monitor our cash flow performance. We believe the presentation of adjusted EBITDA from recurring services is useful to investors as it provides a reasonable representation of the Company’s ability to generate cash from our established subscriber base, and adjusted cash invested in new subscribers illustrates the cash used to grow the subscriber base. This supplemental non-GAAP information should be reviewed in conjunction with our historical consolidated statements of cash flows.

The table below reconciles adjusted EBITDA from recurring services and adjusted cash invested in new subscribers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, to operating profit, their closest GAAP counterpart.

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
(In millions)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Adjusted EBITDA from recurring services	$	90.5		$	81.9		$	252.9		$	239.7
Adjustment to royalty rate(a)		—			(6.8	)		—			(19.5	)
Depreciation and amortization		(23.0	)		(21.5	)		(67.8	)		(63.9	)
Impairment charges from subscriber disconnects		(18.9	)		(16.7	)		(48.7	)		(41.4	)
Amortization of deferred revenue		10.4			10.5			29.5			30.5
Profit from recurring services		59.0			47.4			165.9			145.4
Adjusted cash invested in new subscribers		(67.3	)		(62.0	)		(195.0	)		(187.6	)
Deferred revenue from new subscribers (current year receipts)		(9.9	)		(10.7	)		(30.5	)		(34.3	)
Deferred subscriber acquisition costs (current year payments)		5.3			5.8			16.4			17.9
Security system capital expenditures(b)		44.8			42.3			131.0			127.9
Brand Introduction(c)		(10.6	)		—			(13.9	)		—
Investment in new subscribers		(37.7	)		(24.6	)		(92.0	)		(76.1	)
Operating profit	$	21.3		$	22.8		$	73.9		$	69.3

(a) Our results of operations include a royalty expense that was charged to us by our former parent company for use of certain trademarks. The rate utilized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately 7% of revenues in the United States and 3% of revenues outside of the United States. However, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the rate used was approximately 1.25% of revenues for both within and outside the United States. For comparison purposes, the current royalty rate of 1.25% was used for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. During 2008, a portion of royalty expense was allocated to investment in new subscribers (and is therefore excluded from this adjustment).

(b) Amount excludes non-security system capital expenditures of $3.3 million and $10.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $2.9 million and $7.4 million for the prior year comparable periods.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

Cash flows from operations include cash received from monthly recurring revenue and upfront installation fees received from customers less cash costs to monitor subscribers (including cash corporate costs and cash taxes paid) and certain costs, principally marketing and selling costs, associated with new customer installations. Cash used in investing activities is primarily spent on capital expenditures consisting of equipment, labor, and overhead costs incurred to install security systems for new subscribers and on costs to purchase newly installed security systems from authorized dealers. ~~Prior~~ to the Spin-off, cash flows from financing activities were primarily related to distributions from and contributions to BCO. See Note 2 – Transactions with Related Parties to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our ongoing relationship with BCO after the Spin-off.

Summary Cash Flow Information

The following table shows selected information from our statement of cash flows for the periods presented.

	Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	March 31,
(In millions)	~~2009~~2010			~~2008~~2009
Cash flows from:
Operating activities	$	~~185~~69.06		$	~~154~~66.56
Investing activities		(~~141~~42.21	)		(~~135~~47.32	)
Cash flows available for financing activities	$	4327.85		$	19.24
Financing activities	$	0.98		$	~~(18.3~~—	)

~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 ~~Compared~~compared to the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2008~~ 2009

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

Operating cash flow increased by $303.50 million to $~~185~~69.06 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $~~154~~66.56 million in the prior comparable period, primarily due to the positive effects of a larger subscriber base, apartially ~~reduction~~offset inby ~~the~~Brand ~~royalty~~Introduction rate, and a reduction in cash income taxes paid (with an offsetting increase in deferred income tax liability) resulting from electing bonus depreciation for federal tax purposes on certain capital assets placed in service in the nine months ended September 30, 2009costs. ~~Additionally, in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we paid $18.7 million for current income tax liabilities to BCO.~~

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Investing cash outflows ~~increased~~decreased by $5.91 million to $~~141~~42.21 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $~~135~~47.32 million in the comparable prior period. Non-security system capital expenditures ~~increased~~decreased to $~~10.~~2.1 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 compared to $7.4.9 million in the comparable prior period primarily due to the expansion of, and improvements to, our facilities and upgrades in telecommunication and computer equipment made in the prior period. Capital expenditures for security systems ~~increased~~decreased by $32.13 million to $~~131~~40.0 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~ 2010 relative to the comparable prior period. The majority of our capital expenditures are for equipment, labor, overhead costs incurred to install security systems for new subscribers, and costs to purchase new sites from authorized dealers. The average capital expenditure per new customer site, including new sites installed for existing customers who relocated, increased by $58114 to $~~914~~1,003 in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 from $~~856~~889 in the comparable prior period due primarily to a change in the ratio of security assets acquired from dealers to security assets installed by Company field offices (security assets acquired from dealers have higher average capitalized costs) and an increase in the installation of wireless product. ~~We anticipate that this additional investment will be recovered through future profit from recurring services.~~

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, financing activities were minimal and consisted of proceeds from stock option exercises. Cash flows from financing activities of $18.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were primarily contributions to BCO resulting from positive net cash flow from operating and investing activities.

Debt Obligations

In October 2008, we entered into a credit agreement (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) that provides for a $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility provided by a bank group led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (the “Credit Facility”). A portion of the Credit Facility, up to $15 million, may be used to issue letters of credit. Additionally, the Credit Facility has an expansion feature providing an option to increase the commitment by up to $50 million, under certain conditions. We ~~intend to use the proceeds of the Credit Facility, as necessary, to support our working capital needs, the growth of the business, and for other general corporate purposes.~~ For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, no borrowings have been made under the Credit Facility, but we have used a portion of our capacity under the Credit Facility to issue letters of credit totaling $24.73 million. See Note 6 – Credit Agreement to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the Credit Facility.

Liquidity

With our available resources, we make substantial investments in new subscriber sites with the intention of recouping this investment and generating recurring cash flow over time. We believe our cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy future working capital, capital expenditures, and financing requirements for the foreseeable future. ~~Our~~ However, our ability to generate positive cash flows from operations is dependent on general economic conditions, competitive pressures, and other business and risk factors described elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, we may be required to seek other financing alternatives. Based upon our current cash balance, availability under the Credit Facility, and cash inflows from operations, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to pursue our plans for subscriber growth and to execute the Brand Introduction. Additionally, in February 2009, the U.S. Congress passed and the President signed a stimulus package that contains a provision for bonus depreciation for federal income tax purposes on certain types of capital assets placed in service in 2009. This provision will substantially eliminate our 2009 federal current tax liability, deferring cash payment for those taxes into subsequent years, beginning in 2010. Our cash payments for income taxes during 2010 are expected to approximate our provision for income taxes for the year.

~~Pursuant~~In toFebruary ~~the Tax Matters Agreement (“TMA”)~~2009, ~~BCO~~the ~~elected several tax accounting method changes that have been implemented in BCO’s~~ U.S. ~~Federal~~Congress ~~2008~~passed ~~consolidated~~and ~~tax~~the ~~return~~President ~~which~~signed ~~included~~a ~~our~~stimulus ~~operating~~package ~~results~~that ~~prior~~contained toa ~~the~~provision ~~Spin-off.~~for Asbonus adepreciation ~~result~~for offederal ~~these~~income ~~elections, our current deferred~~ tax ~~asset~~purposes ~~decreased~~on bycertain ~~$16.4~~types ~~million~~of ~~and~~capital ~~noncurrent~~assets ~~deferred~~placed ~~tax~~in ~~liabilities~~service ~~increased~~in ~~by $11~~2009.5 ~~million.~~This ~~These~~provision ~~elections~~substantially ~~change~~reduced ~~the~~our ~~timing~~requirement ~~and~~to ~~amount~~make offederal ~~deductions in future~~ tax ~~returns, possibly impacting our future cash tax~~ payments. ~~Under~~during ~~current tax law~~2009, wedeferring ~~do not anticipate a significant increase in future~~ cash ~~tax~~ payments ~~due~~for tomost ~~these~~of ~~elections provided we continue to grow~~ our ~~subscriber~~2009 ~~base~~tax ~~and~~liability ~~defer substantial amounts of revenue collected from~~into ~~subscribers.~~subsequent ~~See~~years, ~~Note~~beginning 2in ~~– Transactions with Related Parties for further information~~2010.

~~Contractual Obligations and Off-~~Balance Sheet Arrangements

In connection with the Spin-off, BCO agreed to indemnify us for all liabilities related to BCO’s former coal operations and certain tax liabilities under the Tax Matters Agreement (“TMA”). Refer to Note 98 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities for further information regarding indemnification of BCO’s coal liabilities and Note 4 – Income Taxes in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further information about the TMA.

Aggregate information about our obligations and commitments to make future payments under contractual or contingent arrangements was disclosed in our Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates estimates used, including those related to revenue recognition, security system capitalization, useful lives of security systems, deferred subscriber acquisition costs, impairment of security systems, the allowance for doubtful accounts, and income taxes. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

There have been no changes in our critical accounting policies nor have we adopted any new accounting standards during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2009~~2010. For a further discussion of the judgments management makes in applying its accounting policies, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently issued accounting pronouncements are discussed in Note 1 – Description of Business, The Spin-off, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative ~~market~~disclosures ~~risk during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Information~~ about ~~our~~ market risk ~~was~~discussed ~~disclosed~~ in our Form 10-K.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the oversight of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Changes~~There has been no change in ~~Internal~~our ~~Controls~~internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~Before~~21 the Spin-off, the Company relied on certain financial information and resources of BCO to manage certain aspects of the Company’s business and report results, including investor relations and corporate communications, accounting, tax, legal, human resources and benefit plan administration and reporting, general management, real estate, treasury, including insurance and risk management, and oversight functions such as Board of Directors and internal audit, including Sarbanes Oxley compliance. In conjunction with the Company’s separation from BCO, the Company has enhanced its own financial, administrative, and other support systems. The Company has expanded its internal accounting, reporting, legal, and internal auditing departments, and has reformed its policies and systems, as needed, to meet all regulatory requirements on a stand-alone basis.

OtherTable thanof those noted above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company has recorded accruals for losses that are considered probable and reasonably estimable associated with these matters. The Company believes that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial position; however, losses from these matters or changes in estimates of losses for these matters may result in income or expense in any one accounting period that is material in comparison to the earnings of that period.

In April 2009, a Michigan state circuit court jury rendered a verdict against the Company for $4.2 million pertaining to claims made by a terminated employee of the Company. On July 7, 2009, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $4.7 million. This amount included ~~approximately~~ approximately $0.5 million in pre-judgment interest and attorney fees. After post-trial proceedings, on September 25, 2009, the trial court entered a revised judgment in the amount of approximately $3.5 million. The amount of the revised judgment has been included in other accrued liabilities as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010. On October 16, 2009, the Company filed toan appeal ~~the~~seeking ~~revised~~reversal of the judgment. or in the alternative a new trial, based on various alleged points of error by the trial court. In connection with the appeal, the trial court ordered a stay of execution on the judgment which requires the Company to post an appeal bond. The Company has filed its initial appeal brief and a reply to the plaintiff’s brief but no date has yet been set for oral argument.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

~~The~~There ~~following risk factors~~ have been ~~revised~~no material ~~from~~changes to the risk factors ~~included~~discussed in our Form 10-K.

We are subject to contractual limitations on the use of certain BCO trademarks which have required us to develop a new brand for our business.

Prior to the Spin-off, we operated as a subsidiary of BCO, and marketed our products and services using BCO’s brand name and logos. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a Brand Licensing Agreement with a subsidiary of BCO that

grants us the right to use certain trademarks, in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico in connection with the provision of certain products and services. These rights will extend for up to no more than three years (that is, until October 31, 2011), subject to certain terms and conditions, after which we will no longer have the right to use BCO’s brand name. In addition, following the expiration of a five-year non-compete agreement between us and BCO on October 31, 2013, BCO will be able to operate a separate alarm monitoring business using their brand name in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico.

We have incurred and will continue to incur significant expense in connection with building recognition of our new brand.

On June 30, 2009, we announced our new brand name, Broadview Security. In doing so, we have incurred costs associated with developing our new brand and will incur substantial costs in building recognition of our new brand. There is uncertainty regarding the timing, duration and the amount of the total expenses that may be incurred in the brand building effort. We anticipate an incremental investment of primarily marketing expense that could range from $60 to $90 million spread out over a minimum of 24 months following the new brand launch. These estimates are dependent on general economic and strategic marketing decisions that will be made during the transition to the new brand and are therefore subject to change.

Our new brand may not achieve similar brand recognition as our heritage brand, which could adversely affect our business and profitability.

As we introduce the Broadview Security brand name to potential and existing customers, there is some risk that the volume of new installations and the disconnect rate could be negatively impacted. Despite our efforts, we may not be successful in achieving an acceptable level of recognition of our new brand. If we are not successful in achieving recognition for our new brand, our competitive position may be weakened and we may lose market share. However, these risks may be mitigated as we will use our heritage name concurrently with our new brand during the initial phases of the new brand launch.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None

Item 6.

Exhibits.

The exhibits required to be furnished pursuant to Item 6 are listed in the Exhibit Index filed herewith, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

BRINK’S HOME SECURITY HOLDINGS, INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number		Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 18, 2010, by and among Brink’s Home Security Holdings, Inc., Tyco International Ltd., Barricade Merger Sub, Inc. and ADT Security Services, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2010)
2.2		Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 22, 2010, by and among Brink’s Home Security Holdings, Inc., Tyco International Ltd., Barricade Merger Sub, Inc. and ADT Security Services, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 22, 2010)
10.1		First Amendment, Limited Consent and Waiver to Credit Agreement, between the Registrant, the Lender’s party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent, Dated February 17, 2010. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed February 24, 2010)
31.1		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Robert B. Allen
31.2		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Stephen C. Yevich
32.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Robert B. Allen
32.2		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Stephen C. Yevich

2722

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. By /s/ Stephen C. Yevich Stephen C. Yevich ~~Senior~~Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~November~~ April 528, ~~2009~~2010

2823

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · Brink's Home Security Holdings, Inc.