UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~April~~July 4, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-50807

DESIGN WITHIN REACH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		94-3314374
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

225 Bush Street, 20^th Floor, San Francisco, CA		94104
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(415) 676-6500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) (Check one).

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer x (do not check if smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No.

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of ~~May~~August 116, 2009 was 1429,~~489~~906,~~001~~243.

DESIGN WITHIN REACH, INC.

FORM 10-Q — QUARTERLY REPORT

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~APRIL~~JULY 4, ~~2009~~ 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements	1
	Condensed Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of April 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and March 29, 2008	1
	Condensed Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of July 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and June 28, 2008	1
	Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the thirteen week periods ended April 4, 2009 and March 29, 2008	2
	Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008	2
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the thirteen week periods ended April 4, 2009 and March 29, 2008	3
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the twenty-six week periods ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008	3
	Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)	4
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1215
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	2129
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	2230
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	2432
Item 1A	Risk Factors	2432
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2535
Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	2535
Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	2535
Item 5	Other Information	2535
Item 6	Exhibits	2636
SIGNATURES		2737

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Condensed Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	April 4, 2009		January 3, 2009		March 29, 2008
	July 4, 2009		January 3, 2009		June 28, 2008
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~3,099~~464	$	8,684	$	67,~~496~~070
Restricted cash		2,000		—		—
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $159, $164, and $267, respectively)		1,500		1,459		1,755
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $33, $164, and $275, respectively)		1,226		1,459		2,720
Inventory		3024,~~085~~661		36,596		4138,~~217~~028
Prepaid catalog costs		~~183~~140		708		1,~~423~~186
Deferred income taxes		—		—		1,251
Other current assets		32,~~462~~877		3,978		3,~~431~~656
Total current assets		4031,~~329~~368		51,425		5553,~~573~~911
Property and equipment, net		2220,~~522~~073		23,702		2223,~~929~~189
Deferred income taxes, net		—		—		8,182
Other non-current assets		~~1,012~~988		1,025		~~965~~963
Total assets	$	6352,~~863~~429	$	76,152	$	8786,~~649~~245
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	1311,~~595~~167	$	16,978	$	1511,~~305~~899
Accrued expenses		45,~~568~~046		4,455		54,~~271~~992
Accrued compensation		21,~~184~~580		1,945		2,~~079~~543
Deferred revenue		1,~~637~~609		1,162		1,~~980~~954
Customer deposits and other liabilities		3,435		3,191		3,310
Other liabilities		3,234		3,191		3,150
Borrowings under loan agreement		97,~~683~~818		13,949		24,~~534~~657
Long-term debt, current portion		~~317~~150		254		~~351~~357
Total current liabilities		3530,~~419~~604		41,934		3029,~~830~~552
Deferred rent and lease incentives		67,~~377~~023		6,373		6,~~139~~158
Long-term debt, net of current portion		~~206~~188		223		~~224~~125
Total liabilities		4237,~~002~~815		48,530		3735,~~193~~835
Commitments and Contingencies		—		—		—
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock – $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		—		—		—
Common stock – $0.001 par value; authorized 30,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 14,489, 14,480 and 14,455 shares		14		14		14
Common stock – $0.001 par value; authorized 30,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 14,506, 14,480 and 14,471 shares		15		14		14
Additional paid-in capital		60,~~697~~862		60,585		59,~~611~~996
Accumulated other comprehensive income		—		(111)		~~334~~62
Accumulated deficit		(3846,~~850~~263)		(32,866)		(9,~~503~~662)
Total stockholders’ equity		2114,~~861~~614		27,622		50,~~456~~410
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6352,~~863~~429	$	76,152	$	8786,~~649~~245

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Condensed Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
	April 4, 2009		March 29, 2008
	July 4, 2009		June 28, 2008		July 4, 2009		June 28, 2008
Net sales	$	3430,~~076~~861	$	4647,~~914~~260	$	64,937	$	94,174
Cost of sales		1918,~~746~~036		2425,~~738~~325		37,782		50,063
Gross margin		1412,~~330~~825		2221,~~176~~935		27,155		44,111
Selling, general and administrative expenses		20,~~203~~091		2322,~~359~~706		40,294		46,065
Loss from operations		(57,~~873~~266)		(~~1,183~~771)		(13,139)		(1,954)
Interest income		—		5740		—		97
Interest expense		(~~114~~95)		(4870)		(209)		(118)
Other income (expense), net		3(52)		~~(144)~~101		(49)		(43)
Loss before income tax benefit		(57,~~984~~413)		(~~1,318~~700)		(13,397)		(2,018)
Income tax benefit		—		(~~696~~541)		—		(1,237)
Net loss	$	(57,~~984~~413)	$	(~~622~~159)	$	(13,397)	$	(781)
Net loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.4151)	$	(0.0401)	$	(0.92)	$	(0.05)
Diluted	$	(0.4151)	$	(0.0401)	$	(0.92)	$	(0.05)
Weighted average shares used in calculation of net loss per share:
Basic		14,~~488~~495		14,~~455~~462		14,491		14,458
Diluted		14,~~488~~495		14,~~455~~462		14,491		14,458

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands)

	Thirteen weeks ended
	Twenty-six weeks ended
	April 4, 2009		March 29, 2008
	July 4, 2009		June 28, 2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(513,~~984~~397)	$	(~~622~~781)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		13,~~560~~057		13,~~480~~039
Stock-based compensation		~~107~~262		~~465~~817
Impairment of long-lived assets		731,299		—
Provision for doubtful accounts		(5)		3
Loss on the sale/disposal of long-lived assets		16		—
Provision for doubtful accounts		—		11
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		~~(36)~~233		(12,~~212~~185)
Inventory		611,~~511~~935		(~~3,397~~208)
Prepaid catalog costs		~~525~~568		~~678~~915
Other assets		~~520~~1,119		(~~573~~1,077)
Accounts payable		(25,~~913~~399)		~~790~~(2,735)
Accrued expenses		~~(81)~~402		~~942~~317
Accrued compensation		~~239~~(365)		(~~686~~222)
Deferred revenue		~~475~~447		1,~~655~~629
Customer deposits and other liabilities		355		(87)
Other liabilities		154		(247)
Deferred rent and lease incentives		4650		~~163~~182
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		~~1,350~~981		(~~401~~545)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(~~720~~947)		(12,~~196~~541)
Net cash used in investing activities		(~~720~~947)		(12,~~196~~541)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of expenses		516		—33
Net borrowings (repayments) under loan agreement		(46,~~266~~131)		24,~~534~~657
Restricted cash		(2,000)		—
Repayments of long-term obligations		(~~207~~392)		(92185)
Borrowings on notes payable		253		—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(68,~~215~~254)		24,~~442~~505
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(58,~~585~~220)		~~845~~1,419
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		8,684		5,651
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	~~3,099~~464	$	67,~~496~~070
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes paid	$	24	$	16
Income taxes paid (refunded)	$	(264)	$	275
Interest paid	$	~~116~~213	$	53124
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Gain (loss) on fair value of derivatives	$	—	$	~~209~~(15)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1.	Description of Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Business Activity

Design Within Reach, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in California in November 1998 and reincorporated in Delaware in March 2004. The Company is an integrated retailer of distinctive modern design products. The Company markets and sells its products to both residential and commercial customers through three integrated sales points consisting of studios, website and phone. The Company sells its products directly to customers principally throughout the United States and it has one international studio in Canada.

The Company operates on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. Each fiscal year consists of four 13-week quarters, with an extra week added onto the fourth quarter every four to six years. The Company’s 2009 and 2008 fiscal years end on January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively. Fiscal year 2009 consists of 52 weeks and fiscal year 2008 consisted of 53 weeks.

Basis of Presentation and Quarterly Information (unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements as of and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended ~~April~~July 4, 2009 and ~~March~~ June 2928, 2008 have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding interim financial reporting. The accompanying balance sheet as of January 3, 2009 was derived from audited statements within the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009. Accordingly, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by ~~accounting principles~~ generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the ~~first~~thirteen ~~quarters~~and twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or the full fiscal year.

The ~~accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements were prepared according to US GAAP, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the~~ economic downturn has adversely impacted the Company’s operations, resulting in lower sales and higher losses than expected during 2008 and the first ~~quarter~~half of 2009. In response to lower sales following the economic downturn and resulting losses from operations in 2008, the Company undertook several initiatives to lower its expenses to better match the forecasted reduction in revenues ~~and improve liquidity~~ in the fourth quarter of 2008 and ~~the first quarter~~ 2009. The Company restructured certain real estate lease contracts, reduced marketing and catalog expenses primarily by reducing the number of planned catalog mailings and the number of pages per catalog, delayed implementation of a new ERP system, renegotiated certain support contracts related to software maintenance and telecommunications, and lowered outside contractor fees as well as headcount in all areas of the Company. The Company reduced selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $38.1 million in the first ~~quarter~~half of 2009 excluding charges for impairment and future lease liabilities of $2,323,000, and expects reduced selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $1510 million in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable periods in 2008. The Company also reduced inventory levels significantly from year-end 2008 levels to generate additional liquidity. As a result, the Company was able to generate cash from operating activities ~~during~~in the first ~~quarter~~half of 2009. However, ifat ~~the~~July 4, ~~Company~~2009 ~~fails~~there towere ~~generate~~insufficient ~~sales~~assets ~~and~~that ~~margins~~could atbe ~~levels~~liquidated ~~currently~~to ~~forecasted~~support orongoing ~~does~~operational ~~not~~loss ~~obtain additional~~and ~~debt~~without oradditional equity ~~financing~~, it iswas highly unlikely that the Company could continue as a going concern. The ~~financial~~Company ~~statements~~subsequently doraised ~~not~~$15,000,000 ~~include~~of ~~any~~equity ~~adjustments~~financing ~~relating~~on August 3, 2009, of which, $5,000,000 will be used to ~~the~~pay ~~recoverability~~down ~~and~~the ~~classification~~Company’s ofloan ~~recorded~~agreement ~~asset~~with ~~amounts~~Wells ~~and~~Fargo ~~classification~~Retail ofFinance, ~~liabilities~~LLC. ~~that~~This ~~might~~equity should be ~~necessary~~sufficient ~~should~~to ~~the~~fund ~~Company~~operations befor ~~unable~~at toleast ~~continue~~the innext ~~existence~~twelve months.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

Segment Reporting

The Company’s business is conducted in a single operating segment. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer who reviews a single set of financial data that encompasses the Company’s entire operations for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing performance.

Reclassifications

Accounts receivable consists of amounts due from major credit card companies that are generally collected within one to five days after a customer’s credit card is charged, receivables due within 30 days of the invoice date from commercial customers and commissions receivable. Amounts receivable from vendors in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to this presentation for the current reporting period. On the condensed balance sheets as of January 3, 2009 and ~~March~~June 2928, 2008, vendor receivables that were originally included in accounts receivable of approximately $303,000 and $~~439~~338,000, respectively, were reclassified to other current assets. In addition, related to this reclassification, on the condensed statement of cash flows ~~for~~in the ~~thirteen~~twenty-six weeks ended ~~March~~July 294, ~~2008~~2009, $~~191~~292,000 was reclassified from accounts receivable to other assets. These reclassifications did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows used in operating activities.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could affect the results of operations reported in future periods.

Cash and Accounts Payable

As of July 4, 2009, accounts payable included approximately $2,543,000 of outstanding checks in excess of the cash balances in the Company’s bank accounts with Wells Fargo Trade Bank, N.A. No outstanding checks were in excess of the cash balances in the Company’s bank accounts with Wells Fargo Trade Bank, N.A as of January 3, 2009 and June 28, 2008.

Restricted Cash

On March 18, 2009, the Company entered into the first amendment to its loan agreement and a securities account availability agreement with Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC (“Wells Fargo”), in which Wells Fargo increased the amount of advances otherwise available to the Company by $1,000,000 in exchange for the Company’s granting Wells Fargo collateral rights to a deposit account of the Company with a balance of $42,~~678~~187,000 as of July 4, 2009. Wells Fargo will permit the Company to withdraw amounts from this account in excess of $2,000,000 soas long as no default or event of default has occurred. Accordingly, the Company classified $2,000,000 of cash to restricted cash.

~~Inventory~~Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

~~Inventory~~The ~~consists~~Company estimates ofits ~~finished~~allowance ~~goods~~for ~~purchased~~doubtful ~~from~~accounts ~~third-party~~by ~~manufacturers~~considering ~~and~~a ~~estimated~~number ~~inbound~~of ~~freight~~factors, ~~costs.~~including ~~Inventory on hand is carried at~~ the ~~lower~~length of ~~cost~~time oraccounts ~~market.~~receivable ~~Cost~~are ispast ~~determined~~due ~~using~~and the ~~average cost method. The~~ Company’s ~~writes~~previous ~~down~~loss ~~inventory below cost to the estimated market value when necessary, based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions~~history. AsThe offollowing ~~April 4,~~table ~~2009, January 3,~~presents ~~2009~~activities ~~and~~in ~~March 29,~~the ~~2008,~~allowance ~~inventories~~for ~~were~~doubtful ~~$30,085,000,~~accounts: ~~$36,596,000 and $41,217,000, respectively, net of write-downs of $1,813,000, $1,844,000 and $2,522,000, respectively.~~

Total inventory includes inventory-in-transit that consists primarily of finished goods purchased from third-party manufacturers that are in-transit from the vendor to the Company when terms are FOB shipping point and estimated inbound freight costs. Inventory-in-transit also includes those goods that are in-transit from the Company to its customers. Inventory-in-transit is carried at cost. Inventory-in-transit was $2,526,000, $3,203,000 and $5,418,000, as of April 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and March 29, 2008, respectively.


Twenty-six weeks ended	Beginning Balance		Charged/ (Credited) to Operations			Reserve Reduction due to Write-offs			Ending Balance
(amounts in thousands)
July 4, 2009	$	164	$	(1	)	$	(130	)	$	33
June 28, 2008		264		11			—			275

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

Inventory

Inventory consists of finished goods purchased from third-party manufacturers and estimated inbound freight costs. Inventory on hand is carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the average cost method. The Company writes down inventory below cost to the estimated market value when necessary, based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. As of July 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and June 28, 2008, inventories were $24,661,000, $36,596,000 and $38,028,000, respectively, net of write-downs of $1,886,000, $1,844,000 and $2,344,000, respectively.

Total inventory includes inventory-in-transit that consists primarily of finished goods purchased from third-party manufacturers that are in-transit from the vendor to the Company when terms are FOB shipping point and estimated inbound freight costs. Inventory-in-transit also includes those goods that are in-transit from the Company to its customers. Inventory-in-transit is carried at cost. Inventory-in-transit was $2,313,000, $3,203,000 and $4,898,000, as of July 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with determining net sales recognized in any accounting period. The Company recognizes revenue on the date on which it estimates that the product has been received by the customer and retains title to items and bears the risk of loss of shipments until delivery to its customers. The Company recognizes shipping and handling fees charged to customers in net sales at the time products are estimated to have been received by customers. The Company recognizes drop ship sales on a gross basis in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, because it bears the risk of loss until delivery to customers. The Company uses third-party freight carrier information to estimate standard delivery times to various locations throughout the United States and Canada. The Company records as deferred revenue the dollar amount of all shipments for a particular day, if based upon the Company’s estimated delivery time, such shipments, on average, are expected to be delivered after the end of the reporting period. As of ~~April~~ July 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and ~~March~~June 2928, 2008, deferred revenue was $1,~~637~~609,000, $1,162,000 and $1,~~980~~954,000, respectively, and related deferred cost of sales was $~~890~~865,000, $572,000 and $1,~~024~~037,000, respectively.

Sales are recorded net of expected product returns by customers. The Company analyzes historical returns, current economic trends, changes in customer demand and acceptance of products when evaluating the adequacy of the sales returns and other allowances in any accounting period. The returns allowance is recorded as a reduction to net sales for the estimated retail value of the projected product returns and as a reduction in cost of sales for the corresponding cost amount, less any reserve for estimated scrap. The reserves for estimated product returns were $~~532~~465,000, $573,000 and $~~674~~572,000 as of ~~April~~July 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and ~~March~~June 2928, 2008, respectively.

Various governmental authorities directly impose taxes on sales including sales, use, value added and some excise taxes. The Company excludes such taxes from net sales. The Company accounts for gift cards by recognizing a liability at the time a gift card is sold, and recognizing revenue at the time the gift card is redeemed for merchandise. Promotion gift cards, issued as part of a sales transaction, are recorded as a reduction in sales for the value of the gift card.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping costs, which include inbound and outbound freight costs, are included in cost of sales. The Company records costs of shipping products to customers in cost of sales at the time products are estimated to have been received by customers. Handling costs, which include fulfillment center expenses, call center expenses, and credit card fees, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Handling costs were approximately $1,~~742~~573,000 and $2,~~471~~333,000 in the ~~first~~thirteen ~~quarters~~weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, and $3,315,000 and $4,804,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.

Advertising Costs

The cost of print media advertising, other than direct response catalogs, is expensed upon publication. Direct response catalog costs are recorded as prepaid catalog costs and consist of third-party costs, including paper, printing, postage, name acquisition and mailing costs. In accordance with Statements of Position of the Accounting Standards Division No. 93-7, Reporting on Advertising Costs (“SOP 93-7”), advertising costs must be expensed as incurred unless the advertising elicits sales to customers. In order to conclude that advertising elicits sales to customers who could be shown to have responded specifically to the advertising, there must be a means of documenting that response, including a record that can identify the name of the customer and the advertising that elicited the direct response.

In the first nine months of 2008, prepaid catalog costs were amortized over their expected period of future benefit of approximately four months in accordance with SOP 93-7, based upon weighted-average historical revenues attributed to previously issued catalogs. Prepaid catalog costs were $1,423,000 as of March 29, 2008, which included $1,092,000 of unamortized costs for catalogs previously distributed and $331,000 of costs for catalogs waiting to be distributed. In the fourth quarter 2008 and the first quarter 2009, prepaid catalog costs were expensed upon publication since the Company no longer adequately tracked the required information required by SOP 93-7. Prepaid catalog costs for catalogs waiting to be distributed were $183,000 and $708,000 as of April 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009, respectively.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

The Company accounts for consideration received from its vendors for co-operative advertising as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense. Co-operative advertising amounts earned by the Company were $40,000 and $306,000 in the first quarters 2009 and 2008, respectively. Advertising ~~and~~Costs ~~promotion expenses, including catalog expense, net of co-operative advertising, were $2,630,000 and $3,283,000 in the first quarters 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~

~~Apart~~The ~~from amounts~~cost ~~received~~of ~~from~~print ~~vendors~~media ~~for~~advertising, ~~co-operative~~other ~~advertising~~than direct response catalogs, ~~the~~is ~~Company~~expensed ~~does~~upon ~~not~~publication. ~~typically~~Direct ~~receive~~response ~~allowances~~catalog orcosts ~~credits~~are ~~from~~recorded ~~vendors.~~as Inprepaid ~~the~~catalog ~~case~~costs and consist of athird-party ~~few~~costs, ~~select~~including paper, ~~vendors~~printing, ~~the~~postage, ~~Company~~name ~~receives~~acquisition aand ~~small~~mailing ~~discount~~costs. ofIn ~~approximately~~accordance 2%with ~~for~~Statements ~~prompt~~of ~~payment~~ Position of ~~invoices~~the Accounting Standards Division No. 93-7, ~~These~~Reporting ~~discounts~~on ~~were~~Advertising ~~recorded~~Costs (“SOP 93-7”), advertising costs must be expensed as aincurred ~~reduction~~unless ofthe ~~cost~~advertising ofelicits sales ofto $4customers. In order to conclude that advertising elicits sales to customers who could be shown to have responded specifically to the advertising,~~000~~ ~~and~~there ~~$104~~must be a means of documenting that response,~~000~~ inincluding a record that can identify the ~~first~~name ~~quarters~~of ~~2009~~the customer and ~~2008,~~the ~~respectively~~advertising that elicited the direct response.

In the first nine months of 2008, prepaid catalog costs were amortized over their expected period of future benefit of approximately four months in accordance with SOP 93-7, based upon weighted-average historical revenues attributed to previously issued catalogs. Prepaid catalog costs were $1,186,000 as of June 28, 2008, which included $894,000 of unamortized costs for catalogs previously distributed and $292,000 of costs for catalogs waiting to be distributed. Since the fourth quarter 2008, prepaid catalog costs were expensed upon publication since the Company no longer adequately tracked the required information required by SOP 93-7. Prepaid catalog costs for catalogs waiting to be distributed were $140,000 and $708,000 as of July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009, respectively.

The Company accounts for consideration received from its vendors for co-operative advertising as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense. No co-operative advertising amounts were earned by the Company in the thirteen weeks ended July 4, 2009. Co-operative advertising amounts earned by the Company were $153,000 in the thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2008, and $40,000 and $459,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively. Advertising and promotion expenses, including catalog expense, net of co-operative advertising, were $1,551,000 and $3,408,000 in the thirteen weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, and $4,181,000 and $6,691,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.

Apart from amounts received from vendors for co-operative advertising, the Company does not typically receive allowances or credits from vendors. In the case of a few select vendors, the Company receives a small discount of approximately 2% for prompt payment of invoices. These discounts were recorded as a reduction of cost of sales of approximately $6,000 and $48,000 in the thirteen weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, and $10,000 and $152,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method under FAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FAS 109”). Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws currently in effect. The Company estimates a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.

Net Loss per Share

Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to the Company’s common stockholders for the period by the number of weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income per share includes the effects of dilutive instruments, such as stock options, and uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Options to purchase approximately 2,~~416~~371,000 and 2,~~191~~246,000 shares of common stock that were outstanding as of ~~April~~July 4, 2009 and ~~March~~June 2928, 2008, respectively, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss consists of net loss, unrealized mark-to-market gain (loss) on open derivatives, unamortized gain (loss) on settled derivatives and unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, if any. The following table presents comprehensive loss for the first quarters 2009 and 2008:

	Thirteen weeks ended
	April 4, 2009		March 29, 2008
(amounts in thousands)	(unaudited)
Net loss	$	(5,984)	$	(622)
Other comprehensive income:
Net gain on foreign currency cash flow hedges		111		261
Comprehensive loss	$	(5,873)	$	(361)

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

Comprehensive Loss


	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
	July 4, 2009		June 28, 2008		July 4, 2009		June 28, 2008
(amounts in thousands)	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
Net loss	$	(7,413)	$	(159)	$	(13,397)	$	(781)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges		—		(272)		111		(11)

Comprehensive loss	$	(7,413)	$	(431)	$	(13,286)	$	(792)

Derivative and Hedging Activities

The Company’s operations are exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To mitigate its foreign currency exchange rate risk, the Company purchased foreign currency contracts to pay for merchandise purchases based on forecasted demand in 2008. The objective of the Company’s foreign exchange risk management program is to manage the financial and operational exposure arising from these risks by offsetting gains and losses on the underlying exposures with gains and losses on currency contract derivatives used to hedge those exposures. The Company maintains comprehensive hedge documentation that defines the hedging objectives, practices, procedures and accounting treatment. The Company’s hedging program and derivative positions and strategy were reviewed on a regular basis by management. Derivatives used to manage financial exposures for foreign exchange risks generally matured within one year. The Company discontinued its hedging activities during the fourth quarter 2008 resulting in no open contracts as of ~~April~~July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009.

The Company applies FAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 133”), as amended and interpreted, for derivative instruments and requires that all derivatives be recorded at fair value on its balance sheet, including embedded derivatives. In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”), to expand the disclosure framework in FAS 133. The new Statement requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose information about how and why the company uses derivative instruments; how the company accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items under FAS 133; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The expanded disclosure guidance also requires a company to provide information about its strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments; disclose credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements and information about counterparty credit risk; and present the fair value of derivative instruments and related gains or losses in a tabular format. The Company adopted FAS 161 as of the required effective date of January 4, 2009 and will apply its provisions prospectively by providing the additional disclosures in its financial statements for any hedging activity the Company enters into in the future. Additional disclosures required by FAS 161 have not been provided for prior periods. Periods in years after initial adoption will include comparative disclosures, as allowed by FAS 161.

The Company records derivatives related to cash flow hedges for foreign currency at fair value on its balance sheet, including embedded derivatives. Foreign currency contracts entered into during 2008 were designated as cash flow hedge contracts and were accounted for on a monthly basis by adjusting the carrying amount of open designated contracts to fair value by recognizing any corresponding gain or loss in other comprehensive income (loss) and recognizing the net cash settlement gain or loss in other comprehensive income (loss). Subsequently, these net cash settlement gains or losses are recognized in cost of sales as the underlying hedged inventory is sold in each reporting period. In the statements of cash flows, net cash settlement gain or loss is included in operating cash flows as changes in other assets, and as customer deposits and other liabilities. The following table presents designated hedge contract activity for the ~~first~~thirteen ~~quarters~~and twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008:

	Thirteen weeks ended
(amounts in thousands)	April 4, 2009		March 29, 2008
Increase in carrying amount to fair value of open designated hedge contracts	$	—	$	209
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income upon settlement of designated hedge contracts		—		111
Amount of (gain) loss reclassified to cost of sales from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		111		(59)
Other comprehensive income -
Net gain on foreign currency cash flow hedges	$	111	$	261

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

Management evaluates hedges for effectiveness, and for derivatives that are deemed ineffective, the ineffective portion is reported through earnings. The fair market value of the hedged exposure is presumed to be the market value of the hedge instrument when critical terms match. The Company did not record any amounts for ineffectiveness in the first quarters 2009 and 2008.


	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
(amounts in thousands)	July 4, 2009		June 28, 2008		July 4, 2009		June 28, 2008
Decrease in carrying amount to fair value of open designated hedge contracts	$	—	$	(224)	$	—	$	(15)
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income upon settlement of designated hedge contracts		—		221		—		332
Amount of (gain) loss reclassified to cost of sales from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		—		(269)		111		(328)

Other comprehensive income (loss) -
Net gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges	$	—	$	(272)	$	111	$	(11)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~April~~May 2009, the FASB issued ~~FAS~~Statement ~~Staff Position No. 157-4~~165, ~~“Determining~~Subsequent ~~Fair~~Events ~~Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”~~ (“~~FSP~~FAS ~~157-4~~165”), to ~~provide~~incorporate ~~additional guidance on estimating fair value when~~ the ~~volume~~accounting and ~~level~~disclosure ofrequirements ~~activity~~ for subsequent anevents ~~asset~~into orU.S. ~~liability~~generally ~~have~~accepted ~~significantly~~accounting ~~decreased~~principles. ~~FSP~~FAS ~~157-4~~165 ~~also~~introduces ~~includes guidance~~new onterminology, ~~identifying~~defines ~~circumstances that indicate~~ a ~~transaction~~date isthrough ~~not~~which ~~orderly.~~management ~~FSP~~must ~~157-4~~evaluate ~~emphasizes~~subsequent ~~that~~events, ~~regardless of whether the volume~~ and ~~level~~lists ~~of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly and regardless of which valuation technique was used,~~ the ~~objective~~circumstances ~~of a fair value measurement~~ under ~~FASB Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, remains the same,~~ which ~~is to estimate the price that would be received to sell~~ an ~~asset~~entity ormust ~~transfer~~recognize ~~a liability in an~~and ~~orderly~~disclose ~~transaction~~events ~~between~~or ~~market~~transactions ~~participants~~occurring atafter the ~~measurement~~balance-sheet date ~~under current market conditions~~. ~~FSP~~The ~~157-4~~Company ~~also~~adopted ~~requires~~Statement ~~expanded~~165 ~~disclosures.~~as ~~FSP~~of ~~157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June~~July 154, 2009. The Company intends to adopt FSP 157-4 effective the second quarter 2009 and apply its provisions prospectively. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are typically measured using Level 1 inputs and as a result, ~~the~~which ~~Company~~was ~~does not believe that~~ the ~~adoption~~required ofeffective ~~FSP 157-4 will have a significant effect on its financial statements~~date.

InThe ~~April~~Company evaluated its July 4, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events through August 7, 2009, the ~~FASB~~date the financial statements were available to be issued. ~~FAS~~Other ~~Staff~~than ~~Position~~the agreements and events Nonoted below, the Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. ~~107-1~~ ~~and~~On ~~APB~~July 20, ~~28-1~~2009, ~~“Interim~~the ~~Disclosures~~Company ~~about~~entered ~~Fair~~into ~~Value~~a securities purchase agreement relating to a private placement of ~~Financial~~shares ~~Instruments”~~of ~~(“FSP~~its ~~FAS~~common ~~107-1~~stock and ~~APB~~a ~~28-1”)~~new toseries ~~require~~of preferred stock, ondesignated anSeries ~~interim~~A ~~basis~~9% Convertible Preferred Stock. On August 3, ~~disclosures~~2009, ~~about~~Glenhill ~~the~~Special ~~fair~~Opportunities ~~value~~Master Fund LLC invested $15,000,000 of ~~financial~~additional ~~instruments~~capital ~~for~~into the Company ~~public~~in ~~entities~~exchange for a 91.33% ~~FSP~~ownership ~~FAS~~stake. ~~107-1~~At ~~and~~July 4, ~~APB~~2009 ~~28-1~~there iswere ~~effective~~insufficient ~~for~~assets ~~interim~~that could be liquidated to support ongoing operational loss and ~~annual~~without ~~periods~~additional ~~ending~~equity, ~~after~~it ~~June~~was highly unlikely that the Company could continue as a going concern. See Note 8 regarding these subsequent events. On August 154, 2009., ~~The~~the Company ~~intends~~entered tointo ~~adopt~~a ~~FSP~~Second ~~FAS~~Amendment ~~107-1~~to the Loan Agreement and ~~APB~~Waiver ~~28-1~~with ~~effective~~Wells ~~the~~Fargo, ~~second~~in ~~quarter~~which ~~2009.~~Wells ~~The~~Fargo ~~Company~~consented ~~anticipates~~to ~~that~~the ~~this~~$15,000,000 financing of which ~~statement~~$5,000,000 will ~~not~~be ~~have~~used to pay down the loan agreement. See Note 3 regarding the loan agreement with Wells Fargo. Our negotiations and any settlement agreements subsequent to July 4, 2009 with our landlords for lease buy-outs influenced our determination that a ~~significant~~settlement ~~impact~~is onhighly likely and the ~~reporting~~calculation of ~~its~~any ~~results~~estimated ofpotential ~~operations~~settlement. See Note 7 regarding liabilities for future lease payments.

2In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, ~~Fair~~Amendments ~~Value~~to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“FAS 167”), to improve how enterprises account for and disclose their involvement with variable interest entities (VIE’s), which are special-purpose entities, and other entities whose equity at risk is insufficient or lack certain characteristics. Among other things, FAS 167 changes how an entity determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of ~~Financial~~a ~~Instruments~~variable interest entity (“VIE”) and whether that VIE should be consolidated. The new Statement requires an entity to provide significantly more disclosures about its involvement with VIE’s. As a result, the Company must comprehensively review its involvements with VIE’s and potential VIE’s, including entities previous considered to be qualifying special purpose entities, to determine the effect on its financial statements and related disclosures. FAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within the first annual reporting period. Earlier application is prohibited. Since the Company has no involvement with VIE’s, the adoption of FAS 167 will have no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Effective December 30, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes how to measure fair value based on a three-level hierarchy of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.

• Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

We implemented FSP No. 157-2 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 4, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

~~The~~In ~~following~~June ~~table~~2009, ~~presents~~the ~~information~~FASB ~~about~~issued Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets: an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“FAS 166”). FAS 166 changes the derecognition guidance for transferors of financial assets, ~~and~~including ~~liabilities~~entities ~~required~~that sponsor securitizations, to bealign ~~carried~~that atguidance ~~fair~~with the original ~~value~~intent onof FASB Statement 140, Accounting for the Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. FAS 166 also eliminates the exemption from consolidation for qualifying special-purpose entities (“QSPE’s”). As a ~~recurring~~result, ~~basis~~all existing QSPE’s need to be evaluated to determine whether the QSPE should be consolidated in accordance with FAS 166. FAS 166 is effective as of ~~April~~the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual reporting period beginning after November 415, 2009:, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The recognition and measurement provisions of FAS 166 must be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. Early application is prohibited. The new Statement also requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets that occur both before and after the effective date. Since the Company has no involvement with QSPE’s or transfers of financial assets, the adoption of FAS 166 will have no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

(amounts in thousands)	Fair Value at April 4, 2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash equivalents	$	2,905	$	2,905	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		2,000		2,000		—		—

In April 2009, the FASB issued FAS Staff Position No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP 157-4”) to provide additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 emphasizes that, regardless of whether the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly and regardless of which valuation technique was used, the objective of a fair value measurement under FASB Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, remains the same, which is to estimate the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP 157-4 also requires expanded disclosures. FSP 157-4 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FSP 157-4 effective April 5, 2009. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are typically measured using Level 1 inputs and as a result, the adoption of FSP 157-4 did not have any effect on its financial statements. See Note 2 regarding fair value of financial instruments.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FAS Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”) to require, on an interim basis, disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for public entities. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 effective April 5, 2009. The adoption FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not have any impact on the reporting of its results of operations. See Note 2 for fair value of financial instruments.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

2.	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Effective December 30, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”) for financial assets and liabilities, and non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. Effective January 4, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually, in accordance with FAS Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (See Note 7). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes how to measure fair value based on a three-level hierarchy of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.

•

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

•

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table presents information about assets and liabilities required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 4, 2009:


(amounts in thousands)	Fair Value at July 4, 2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash equivalents	$	220	$	220	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		2,000		2,000		—		—

The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements.

3.	Loan Agreement and Long-term Debt

On February 2, 2007, the Company entered into a Loan, Guaranty and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC (“Wells Fargo”). The Loan Agreement expires on February 2, 2012 and provides for an ~~initial~~ overall credit line up to $20,000,000~~, which may be increased to $25,000,000 at the Company’s option provided the Company is not in default on the Loan Agreement~~. The Loan Agreement consists of a revolving credit line and letters of credit up to $5,000,000. The amount the Company may borrow at any time under the Loan Agreement is based upon a percentage of eligible inventory and accounts receivable less certain reserves. Borrowings are secured by the right, title and interest to all of the Company’s personal property, including cash, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, fixtures, general intangibles and intellectual property. The Loan Agreement contains various restrictive covenants, including minimum availability, restrictions on payment of dividends, limitations on indebtedness, limitations on subordinated indebtedness and limitations on the amount of capital expenditures the Company may incur in any fiscal year. The Company is currently in compliance with all of these restrictive covenants.

InOn March 18, 2009, the ~~fourth~~Company ~~quarter~~entered ~~2008~~into ~~and~~a first amendment to the ~~first~~Loan ~~quarter~~Agreement ~~2009,~~and ~~bank-commissioned~~a ~~appraisals~~securities account availability agreement with Wells Fargo ~~determined~~in ~~that~~which ~~the~~Wells ~~net~~Fargo ~~liquidation~~increased ~~value~~the amount of advances otherwise available to the Company by $1,000,000 in exchange for the Company’s ~~inventories~~granting ~~had~~Wells ~~declined~~Fargo ~~due~~collateral rights to ~~general~~a ~~market~~deposit ~~conditions~~account ~~and,~~of asthe Company with a ~~result~~balance of $2,187,000 as of July 4, 2009. Wells Fargo ~~reduced~~permitted the Company’s ~~advance~~to ~~rates,~~withdraw ~~which~~amounts ~~constricted~~from ~~the~~this ~~availability~~account ofin ~~borrowings~~excess ~~under the line~~ of ~~credit.~~$2,000,000 ~~The~~as ~~availability~~long ofas ~~borrowings~~no ~~would~~default ~~decrease~~or ifevent ~~subsequent~~of ~~appraisals~~default ~~determine~~has ~~that~~occurred. Accordingly, the ~~net~~Company ~~liquidation~~classified ~~value~~$2,000,000 of ~~the~~cash ~~Company’s~~to ~~inventories~~restricted ~~have decreased~~cash.

~~Wells~~11 Fargo increased discretionary reserves by $1,500,000 in the first quarter 2009. On March 18, 2009, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Loan Agreement and a securities account availability agreement with Wells Fargo in which Wells Fargo increased the amount of advances otherwise available to the Company by $1,000,000 in exchange for the Company’s granting Wells Fargo collateral rights to a deposit account of the Company with a balance of $4,678,000. Wells Fargo will permit the Company to withdraw amounts from this account in excess of $2,000,000 so long as no default or event of default has occurred. Accordingly, the Company classified $2,000,000 of cash to restricted cash. In addition, Wells Fargo rescinded its decision to require additional discretionary reserves of $1,500,000. On April 14, 2009, the Company withdrew $1,000,000 from this account for working capital purposes.

Interest on borrowings will be either at Wells Fargo’s prime rate, or LIBOR plus 1.25% to 1.75% based upon average availability, and the unused credit line fee is 0.3%. In the event of default, the Company’s interest rates will be increased by two percentage points. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings at April 4, 2009 was 3.25%. As of April 4, 2009, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $9,683,000 under the revolving credit line and $1,318,000 in outstanding letters of credit. Advances of $3,836,000 were available under the revolving credit line as of April 4, 2009.

In January 2009, the Company financed the second and third years of a three year software license fee of approximately $253,000 per year with a promissory note. As of April 4, 2009, the Company’s outstanding borrowings under this and other notes were $261,000 with interest rates ranging from 2% to 11% maturing in 2009.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

On August 4, 2009, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement and Waiver with Wells Fargo, in which Wells Fargo consented to the $15,000,000 financing (See Note 8) of which $5,000,000 will be used to pay down the Loan Agreement. In addition, the Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement removes collateral rights to the deposit account of the Company contained in the first amendment to the Loan Agreement, lowered the borrowing base and eligible in-transit inventory and increased minimum availability, letter of credit costs, the unused credit line fee and the interest rate that the Company pays on borrowings.

As of August 4, 2009, interest on borrowings will be based upon average availability either at a base rate plus 2% to 2.5%, or LIBOR plus 3% to 3.5%, and the unused credit line fee is 0.5%. The base rate is the greater of Wells Fargo’s prime rate or the Federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%. In the event of default, the Company’s interest rate will be increased by two percentage points. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings at July 4, 2009 was 3.25%, which increased to 5.5% on August 4, 2009. As of July 4, 2009, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $7,818,000 under the revolving credit line and $1,523,000 in outstanding letters of credit. Advances of $2,419,000 were available under the revolving credit line as of July 4, 2009.

In the fourth quarter 2008 and the first half of 2009, bank-commissioned appraisals determined that the net liquidation value of the Company’s inventories had declined due to general market conditions and, as a result, Wells Fargo reduced the Company’s advance rates, which constricted the availability of borrowings under the line of credit. The availability of borrowings will decrease if subsequent appraisals determine that the net liquidation value of the Company’s inventories has decreased.

In January 2009, the Company financed the second and third years of a three year software license fee of approximately $253,000 per year with a promissory note. As of July 4, 2009, the Company’s outstanding borrowings under this and other notes were $93,000 with interest rates ranging from 2% to 11% maturing in 2009.

4.	Commitments

As of ~~April~~July 4, 2009, inventory purchase obligations related to open purchase orders were approximately $711,~~920~~526,000, commitments for furniture, fixtures, and leasehold improvements related to studios were approximately $~~387~~186,000, and commitments to maintain and enhance various information technology systems and website were approximately $1963,~~316,~~000.

5.	Income Taxes

No income tax benefit was recognized in the ~~first~~thirteen ~~quarter~~and twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 because recent general economic events have indicated that more likely than not the tax benefit of the year-to-date pre-tax loss would not be realized. InFor the ~~first~~thirteen ~~quarter~~and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008, the Company recorded a tax ~~benefit~~benefits of approximately $~~696~~541,000 and $1,237,000, respectively, calculated at the projected annual effective tax rate of 5261.83%. The difference between the statutory rate of 39.5% and effective tax rate ~~was~~is primarily due to projected stock-based compensation expense related to incentive stock options not being deductible for tax purposes. Utilization of the net operating losses and tax credits will be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions because of the $15,000,000 financing on August 3, 2009 (See Note 8). The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses and tax credits before utilization.

6.	Related Party Transactions

The Company rents studio space from an affiliate of the former Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. Rent expense, applicable to this space was approximately $40,000 for each of the ~~first~~thirteen ~~quarters~~weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, and $80,000 for each of the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008.

7.12 ~~Subsequent Events~~

The Company closed its Southlake, Texas and Tigard, Oregon studios during the second quarter 2009. Accordingly, leasehold improvements related to the Southlake, Texas studio were deemed impaired as of April 4, 2009. An impairment charge of $73,000 was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the first quarter 2009 that reduced net property and equipment. The Company incurred an impairment charge related to the leasehold improvements for the Tigard, Oregon studio in 2008.

In accordance with FASB Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“FAS 146”), a liability for costs that will continue to be incurred under the lease agreement for the remaining term without economic benefit to the Company shall be recognized and measured at the lease’s fair value at the cease-use date. The Company will record additional charges in the second quarter 2009 for future lease payments at the cease-use date in accordance with FAS 146.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

7.	Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Liabilities for Future Lease Payments

The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets in accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“FAS 144”). The Company closed three studios in the second quarter 2009. In addition, the carrying value of leasehold improvements were determined not likely to be recovered by identified future cash flows for five other studios with current-period cash flow losses combined with a history of cash flow losses or a projection that demonstrates continuing losses. The leasehold improvements were determined to have no fair value. Accordingly, leasehold improvements related to these studios were deemed impaired and impairment charges of $73,000 and $1,226,000 were included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the first and second quarters 2009, respectively, that reduced the carrying amount of each leasehold improvement, less any associated tenant improvement and other liabilities, to a fair value of zero.

In accordance with FASB Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“FAS 146”), a liability for costs that will continue to be incurred under the lease agreement for the remaining term without economic benefit to the Company shall be recognized and measured at the lease’s fair value at the cease-use date. Accordingly, charges of $1,024,000 related to the three closed studios were included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter 2009 that increased accrued expenses or deferred rent and lease incentives liability. The fair value of each lease was determined by either estimating a lease buy-out payment to the landlord when active negotiations indicate that a settlement is highly likely, or by using an income approach of calculating the present value of future lease payments less estimated sublease receipts. Our negotiations and any settlement agreements subsequent to July 4, 2009 with our landlords for lease buy-outs influenced our determination that a settlement is highly likely and the calculation of any estimated potential settlement. Additional charges or recoveries may be incurred in future periods for these three closed studios based on actual subleases or negotiated settlements with landlords and for any additional closed studios.

The following table presents information about assets and liabilities required to be carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of July 4, 2009 (See Note 2 for SFAS 157 three-level hierarchy of inputs):


	As of January 3, 2009		Fair Value Measurements Using
(amounts in thousands)	As of January 3, 2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Charge
Impaired leasehold improvements	$	1,299	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,299
Liability for future lease payments		—		—		—		1,024		1,024

8.	Subsequent Events

On July 20, 2009, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement relating to a private placement of shares of its common stock and a new series of preferred stock, designated Series A 9% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC, an affiliate of Glenhill Capital Management, LLC (the “Investor”), invested $15,000,000 of additional capital into the Company on August 3, 2009 in exchange for a 91.33% ownership stake.

On August 3, 2009, the Investor purchased 15,400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.15 per share and 1,000,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $12.69 per share with gross proceeds of $15,000,000. Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to an annual compounded dividend of 9% on each share of Series A Preferred Stock, payable in kind at the purchase price of the Series A Preferred Stock, annually in arrears. The annual dividend rate will automatically increase to 15% if the Company’s stockholders do not approve the necessary increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock to permit full conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, or a default by the Company on any of the material terms and conditions of the Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder of Series A Preferred Stock, into 137,409,132 shares of common stock which, together with the 15,400,000 shares of common stock issued to the Investor in connection with the transaction, equal 91.33% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

Design Within Reach, Inc.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) – (continued)

The Series A Preferred Stock is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution protection in connection with future issuances of equity securities, subject to customary exceptions. The liquidation preference per share of the Series A Preferred Stock is equal to the purchase price of the Series A Preferred Stock plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. However, if the Company’s stockholders do not approve the increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock within 90 days of the closing, the liquidation preference per share of the Series A Preferred Stock will automatically increase to four times such amount and increases in increments of 5% for each month thereafter pro rated daily. Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to voting rights equal to the number of shares of common stock into which the Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, on an “as if” converted basis.

If the Company’s stockholders do not approve the increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock, then on or after the first anniversary of the closing, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled, in their sole discretion, to require the Company to redeem their shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the applicable liquidation preference. The common stock issued and the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to customary registration rights. If the Company proposes to offer equity or equity-like securities to any person (other than in an underwritten public offering), the Investor will have the right to purchase its pro rata portion of such shares (based on the number of shares which would be outstanding assuming that the stockholders approved the increase in the authorized number of shares of the Company’s common stock, on an as-converted and as-exercised basis). The Company is obligated to file a registration statement registering the resale of shares of its common stock issued in the transaction and issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock. The Company is obligated to pay the Investors additional cash fees of 2% per month subject to a maximum of $1.5 million for each month in which any of the following occur: the registration statement is not timely filed, or declared effective within the time frame described; the registration statement is suspended other than as permitted in the registration rights agreement; after effectiveness, the registration statement ceases to remain continuously effective for ten consecutive calendar days or fifteen calendar days in any twelve month period; or the Company fails to make current public information available.

Upon closing of the equity financing on August 3, 2009, Hilary Billings, William McDonagh, James Peters and Lawrence Wilkinson resigned as directors of the Company. In accordance with the Company’s bylaws for filling board vacancies, the remaining board members, Ray Brunner and Peter Lynch, appointed Glenn J. Krevlin, David Rockwell and William Sweedler to serve as directors of the Company effective on August 3, 2009. Messrs. Krevlin, Rockwell and Sweedler have been designated by the Investor. In addition, the size of the Company’s board of directors was reduced to five.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements in this report and the information incorporated herein by reference about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not historical facts and are forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words or phrases such as “believe,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “expect,” “should,” or “would.” We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance or achievement. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law.

The interim financial statements and this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2009.

Overview

We are a retailer of distinctive modern design products to both residential and commercial customers. Our clients purchase through three integrated sales points, consisting of our studios, website and phone. We have developed a presence in modern design furnishings and a brand recognized for design excellence among our customers and the design community. In the process we have created a business model that enables us to provide products to our customers in a more convenient, efficient and economical manner than was previously available to them. Our policy of maintaining core products in stock represents a departure from the approach taken by many other modern design furnishings retailers. Our relationships with both internationally recognized and emerging designers continue to grow and allow us to offer our customers an array of innovative and often hard-to-find merchandise.

We expanded our offerings in accessories called “DWR:Tools for Living.” In this category we feature approximately 700 products, ranging in price from under $10 to over $2,000. The products all share good design and functionality. Each DWR:Tools for Living product is unique in how it solves a problem or makes something more comfortable or easier to use.

Our business strategy is based upon the premise that integrated sales points improve customer convenience, reinforce brand awareness, enhance customer knowledge of our products and produce operational benefits that ultimately improve market penetration and returns on capital. We believe most traditional retailers initially established their presence with one sales point and subsequently added additional sales points, thereby making integration across sales points more difficult.

1215

WeAll ~~had~~of 66our ~~studios~~sales points, ~~two~~other than our DWR:Tools for Living stores and ~~three~~ outlets, ~~operating~~utilize a single common inventory held at our Hebron, Kentucky fulfillment center. Because we don’t offer a “cash and carry” option in 25our ~~states~~studios, we are able to more fully utilize selling space and avoid the ~~District~~operational issues that often arise with stock ofbalancing ~~Columbia~~and store replenishment. We currently source our products primarily in the United States and ~~Canada~~Europe. asIn ofthe ~~April~~twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009, we purchased approximately 31% of our product inventories from manufacturers in foreign countries, with 16% of our product inventory purchases being paid for in Euros. We ~~opened~~expect ~~one~~to ~~new~~have ~~outlet~~an ~~during~~increasing ~~the~~amount ~~first~~of ~~quarter~~products ~~2009~~being sourced from factories outside of Europe. We ~~closed~~plan to increase our ~~Southlake,~~efforts ~~Texas~~to develop products internally and include ~~Tigard~~more exclusive items in our mix, ~~Oregon~~and ~~studios~~in ~~during~~doing so, source products from other parts of the ~~second~~world ~~quarter~~including ~~2009~~Latin America and Asia where product costs are generally lower. WeOur ~~believe~~product development team has worked diligently to find qualified factories in North America, Asia and elsewhere that can provide us with the ~~number~~quality our clients expect but free us from the impact of ~~available~~fluctuations ~~locations~~in ~~is currently~~the ~~limited~~price toof ~~our~~the 66Euro. ~~studios~~By ~~and~~the ~~three~~end ~~outlets~~of 2009, ~~and~~we believe we ~~may~~can ~~need~~achieve toproduct ~~close~~margin ~~underperforming~~improvements from ~~studios~~these efforts.

~~All~~We ofhad ~~our~~63 ~~sales points~~studios, ~~other than~~two ~~our new~~ DWR:Tools for Living stores, ~~utilize a single common inventory held at our Hebron, Kentucky fulfillment center. Because we don’t offer a “cash~~ and ~~carry”~~three ~~option~~outlets operating in ~~our~~24 ~~studios~~states, wethe ~~are~~District ~~able~~of ~~to more fully utilize selling~~Columbia ~~space~~ and ~~avoid~~Canada ~~the~~as ~~operational~~of ~~issues~~July 4, ~~that often arise with stock balancing and store replenishment~~2009. WeIn ~~currently~~the ~~source~~first ~~our~~quarter ~~products~~2009, ~~primarily~~we inopened ~~the~~one ~~United~~new ~~States and Europe~~outlet. In the ~~first~~second quarter 2009, we ~~purchased~~relocated ~~approximately~~one ~~36%~~studio ofand closed our ~~product~~ ~~inventories~~Southlake, ~~from~~Texas, ~~manufacturers in foreign countries~~Tigard, ~~with~~Oregon ~~20%~~and ofLas ~~our~~Vegas ~~product~~Town ~~inventory~~Square ~~purchases being paid for in Euros~~studios. We ~~expect~~incurred toimpairment charges ~~have an increasing amount~~ of ~~products~~$1,299,000 ~~being~~for ~~sourced~~leasehold ~~from~~improvements ~~factories~~related ~~outside of Europe. We plan~~ to ~~increase our~~the ~~efforts~~closed tostudios ~~develop products internally~~ and ~~include~~five ~~more~~other ~~exclusive~~studios ~~items~~with incontinuing ~~our~~losses ~~mix, and~~ in ~~doing~~the ~~so,~~first ~~source~~half ~~products from other parts~~ of ~~the world including Latin America and Asia where product costs are generally lower~~2009. ~~Our~~In ~~product~~addition, ~~development team~~we ~~has~~incurred ~~worked~~charges ~~diligently~~of ~~to find qualified factories in North America~~$1,024,000 ~~Asia~~for ~~and~~future ~~elsewhere~~rent ~~that~~payments ~~can~~related ~~provide~~to ~~us with~~ the ~~quality~~three closed ~~our~~studios ~~clients expect but free us from the impact of fluctuations~~ in the ~~price~~second ofquarter ~~the Euro. By the end of~~ 2009~~, we believe we can achieve product margin improvements from these efforts~~. We ~~believe~~have ~~that~~no ~~within~~current ~~four~~plans ~~years~~for weany ~~may~~new ~~have~~studios, ~~less~~and ~~than~~may ~~20%~~need ofto ~~our~~close ~~product~~underperforming ~~coming from European factories~~studios.

On June 25, 2009, we notified the NASDAQ Stock Market of our intent to delist our common stock from the NASDAQ Global Market. On July 6, 2009 we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ a Form 25 relating to the delisting of our common stock. Trading in our common stock was suspended by NASDAQ effective at the open of business on July 6, 2009, with official delisting of our common stock effective ten days thereafter, on July 16, 2009. However, we remain as an SEC registrant and our shares continue to trade on the Pink Sheets, a centralized electronic quotation service for over-the-counter securities.

On July 20, 2009, we entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to a private placement of shares of our common stock and a new series of preferred stock, designated Series A 9% Convertible Preferred Stock, or Series A Preferred Stock. On August 3, 2009, Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC, an affiliate of Glenhill Capital Management, LLC, or the Investor, invested $15,000,000 of additional capital into the company. The Investor purchased 15,400,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.15 per share and 1,000,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $12.69 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock, into 137,409,132 shares of common stock which, together with the 15,400,000 shares of common stock issued to the Investor in connection with the transaction, equal 91.33% of our outstanding common stock.

Upon closing of the equity financing on August 3, 2009, Hilary Billings, William McDonagh, James Peters and Lawrence Wilkinson resigned as our directors . In accordance with our bylaws for filling board vacancies, the remaining board members, Ray Brunner and Peter Lynch, appointed Glenn J. Krevlin, David Rockwell and William Sweedler to serve as our directors effective on August 3, 2009. Messrs. Krevlin, Rockwell and Sweedler have been designated by the Investor. In addition, the size of our board of directors was reduced to five.

Recent market and economic conditions have been unprecedented and challenging with tighter credit conditions, slower growth, and increased market uncertainty and instability in both U.S. and international capital and credit markets. These conditions, combined with declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment have recently contributed to volatility of unprecedented levels. The purchase of our products by customers is discretionary, and therefore highly dependent upon the level of consumer spending, particularly among affluent customers. Accordingly, sales of our products have been and may continue to be adversely affected by the current unfavorable market and economic conditions. As a result, we may be required to take significant additional markdowns in response to the lower levels of demand for our products.

In16 response to lower sales following the economic downturn and resulting losses from operations in 2008, we undertook several initiatives to lower our expenses to better match the forecasted reduction in revenues and improve liquidity in the fourth quarter 2008 and the first quarter 2009. We have restructured certain real estate lease contracts, reduced marketing and catalog expenses primarily by reducing the number of planned catalog mailings and the number of pages per catalog, delayed implementation of a new ERP system, renegotiated certain support contracts related to software maintenance and telecommunications, and lowered outside contractor fees as well as headcount in all areas of the Company. We reduced expenses by approximately $3 million in the first quarter 2009 and expect reduced expenses of approximately $15 million in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable periods in 2008. We also reduced inventory levels significantly from year-end 2008 levels to generate additional liquidity.

While we have generated sufficient liquidity to sustain operations with significant operating losses to date, if we fail to generate sales and margins at levels currently forecasted or do not obtain additional debt or equity financing, it is unlikely that we will be able to maintain sufficient liquidity to continue as a going concern.

In February 2009, we announced the engagement of Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, an investment banking firm, to assist in the review of strategic alternatives, including advice related to an unsolicited offer we recently received. In the review process, an independent committee of the board will consider a full range of possible alternatives, including, among other things, a possible sale, merger, strategic partnership or refinancing. We currently have no commitments or agreements with respect to any particular transaction, and there can be no assurance that our review of strategic alternatives will result in any transaction.

In response to lower sales following the economic downturn and resulting losses from operations in 2008, we undertook several initiatives to lower our expenses to better match the forecasted reduction in revenues and improve liquidity in the fourth quarter 2008 and 2009. We have restructured certain real estate lease contracts, reduced marketing and catalog expenses primarily by reducing the number of planned catalog mailings and the number of pages per catalog, delayed implementation of a new ERP system, renegotiated certain support contracts related to software maintenance and telecommunications, and lowered outside contractor fees as well as headcount in all areas of the company. Excluding charges for impairment and future lease liabilities of $2,323,000, we reduced selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $8.1 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and expect reduced selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $10 million in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable periods in 2008. We also reduced inventory levels significantly from year-end 2008 levels to generate additional liquidity. As a result, we were able to generate cash from operating activities in the first half of 2009. However, at July 4, 2009 there were insufficient assets that could be liquidated to support ongoing operational loss and without additional equity, it was highly unlikely that the company could continue as a going concern. We subsequently raised $15,000,000 of equity financing on August 3, 2009, of which, $5,000,000 will be used to pay down our loan agreement with Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC. This equity should be sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months.

Basis of Presentation

We operate on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. Each fiscal year consists of four 13-week quarters, with an extra week added onto the fourth quarter every four to six years. Our 2009 and 2008 fiscal years end on January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, respectively. Fiscal year 2009 consists of 52 weeks and fiscal year 2008 consisted of 53 weeks.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the thirteen weeks ended ~~April~~ July 4, 2009 (~~First~~Second Quarter 2009) to the thirteen weeks ended ~~March~~June 2928, 2008 (~~First~~ Second Quarter 2008)

Net Sales

Net sales consist of studio sales, online sales, phone sales, other sales and shipping and handling fees, net of actual and estimated returns by customers. Studio sales consist of sales of merchandise to customers from orders placed at our studios and sales at our DWR:Tools for Living stores, online sales consist of sales of merchandise from orders placed through our website, phone sales consist of sales of merchandise through the toll-free numbers associated with our printed catalogs, and other sales consist of warehouse sales and outlet sales. Warehouse sales consist of periodic clearance sales at our fulfillment center of product samples and returned product from our customers. Outlet sales consist of sales at our outlets of product samples, returned product from our customers and to a lesser degree full price product. Shipping and handling fees consist of amounts we charge customers for the delivery of merchandise.

	Thirteen weeks ended
(amounts in thousands, except percentages)	~~April~~July 4, 2009		% ofNet Sales	~~March~~June 2928, 2008		% ofNet Sales	Change		% Change
Studio sales	$	2322,~~468~~159	6871.98%	$	3132,~~314~~617	6669.70%	$	(710,~~846~~458)	(2532.1)%
Online sales		54,~~206~~077	1513.32%		6,~~327~~276	13.53%		(12,~~121~~199)	(1735.70)%
Phone sales		2,~~365~~111	6.98%		4,~~298~~128	98.27%		(12,~~933~~017)	(4548.09)%
Other sales		1,~~701~~428	54.07%		1,~~420~~782	3.08%		~~281~~(354)	(19.8 9)%
Shipping and handling fees		1,~~336~~086	3.95%		32,~~555~~457	75.62%		(21,~~219~~371)	(6255.48)%
Net sales	$	3430,~~076~~861	100.0%	$	4647,~~914~~260	100.0%	$	(1216,~~838~~399)	(2734.47)%

Net sales decreased $12,838,000, or 27.4%, to $34,076,000 in the first quarter 2009 from $46,914,000 in the first quarter 2008. The decrease in the combined net sales of our three sales points (studio, online and phone) is related to a 5% decrease in the number of units of merchandise shipped, a decrease in prices due to an increase in promotional discounts and a change in product mix to a relative higher volume of lower priced DWR:Tools for Living merchandise. The average revenue per unit of product sold decreased by 23%. All of these factors are attributed to the impact of the unfavorable economy. Studio sales decreased $7,846,000, or 25.1%, in the first quarter 2009 compared to the first quarter 2008. We had 66 studios, two DWR:Tools for Living stores and three outlets open at the end of the first quarter 2009 compared to 68 studios and one outlet open at the end of the first quarter 2008. Online sales decreased $1,121,000, or 17~~.7%,~~ ~~and phone sales decreased $1,933,000, or 45.0%, in the first quarter 2009 compared to the first quarter 2008.~~

Other sales increased $281,000, or 19.8%, in the first quarter 2009 compared to the first quarter 2008. This increase is primarily related to an increase of $192,000 in sales generated from our outlets including our newly opened Palm Springs outlet, and an increase from warehouse sales of $82,000. Shipping and handling fees for delivery of merchandise decreased $2,219,000, or 62.4%, in the first quarter 2009 compared to the first quarter 2008, primarily attributable to the decrease in product sales and an increase in the amount of promotional free shipping.

Net sales decreased $16,399,000, or 34.7%, to $30,861,000 in the second quarter 2009 from $47,260,000 in the second quarter 2008. The decrease in the combined net sales of our three sales points (studio, online and phone) is related to a 15% decrease in the number of units of merchandise shipped, a decrease in prices due to an increase in promotional discounts and a change in product mix to a relative higher volume of lower priced DWR:Tools for Living merchandise. The average revenue per unit of product sold decreased by 22%. All of these factors are attributed to the impact of the unfavorable economy. Studio sales decreased $10,458,000, or 32.1%, in the second quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008. We relocated one studio and closed three studios during the second quarter 2009. We had 63 studios, two DWR:Tools for Living stores and three outlets open at the end of the second quarter 2009 compared to 68 studios and one outlet open at the end of the second quarter 2008. Online sales decreased $2,199,000, or 35.0%, and phone sales decreased $2,017,000, or 48.9%, in the second quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008.

Other sales decreased $354,000, or 19.9%, in the second quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008. This decrease is primarily related to a decrease of $425,000 from warehouse sales, partially offset, by an increase of $56,000 in sales generated from our outlets including our recently opened Palm Springs outlet. Shipping and handling fees for delivery of merchandise decreased $1,371,000, or 55.8%, in the second quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008, primarily attributable to the decrease in product sales and an increase in the amount of promotional free shipping.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales decreased by $47,~~992~~289,000, or 2028.28%, to $1918,~~746~~036,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 from $2425,~~738~~325,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008. The decrease in cost of sales is attributable to the decrease in net sales. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased 54.28 percentage points to 5758.94% in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 from 5253.76% in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008, primarily attributable to increased promotional sales discounts and negative margins on shipping because of promotional free shipping. Shipping ~~The~~margins ~~shipping~~were ~~margin was~~ negative in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 ~~compared~~and tosecond ~~a positive shipping margin in the first~~ quarter 2008. We expect cost of sales as a percentage of net sales to increase in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter 2008 as we utilize more promotional sales discounts and free shipping ~~than the second quarter of 2008~~.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of studio, marketing, corporate and fulfillment center costs. Studio costs include salaries and studio occupancy costs. Marketing costs include consumer and online advertising expenses, and costs associated with publishing our catalogs. Corporate costs include salaries, occupancy costs, computer systems and web-site related costs and professional fees, among others. Fulfillment center costs include salaries, occupancy costs and charges for shipping merchandise from our fulfillment center to studios, DWR:Tools for Living stores, outlet and warehouse sales events. Our gross margins may not be comparable to those of other companies because some other companies include all of the costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales, while other companies, including us, may exclude a portion of those costs from gross margin, including them instead in other line items, such as selling, general and administrative expenses.

Thirteen weeks ended

(amounts in thousands, except percentages)

~~April~~July 4, 2009

% ofNet Sales

~~March~~June 2928, 2008

% ofNet Sales

Change

% Change

Salaries and benefits

76,~~603~~656

2221.36%

98,~~360~~869

2018.08%

(12,~~757~~213)

(1825.80)%

Occupancy and related expense

6,~~735~~670

1921.86%

6,~~363~~616

1314.60%

~~372~~54

50.8 %

Catalog, advertising and promotion

21,~~630~~551

75.70%

3,~~283~~408

7.02%

(~~653~~1,857)

(1954.95)%

Other expenses

24,~~542~~485

714.5%

3,~~319~~466

7.13%

~~(777)~~1,019

~~(23~~29.4)%

Professional - legal, consulting, SOX

~~693~~729

2.04%

~~1,034~~347

20.27%

~~(341)~~382

~~(33~~110.0)1 %

Total SG&A

20,~~203~~091

5965.31%

2322,~~359~~706

4948.80%

(32,~~156~~615)

(1311.5)%

~~SG&A~~18 expenses decreased by $3,156,000, or 13.5%, to $20,203,000 in the first quarter 2009 from $23,359,000 in the first quarter 2008. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses increased to 59.3% in the first quarter 2009 from 49.8% in the first quarter 2008, attributable to the decreased net sales. The decreases in SG&A are described below. In response to lower sales following the economic downturn and resulting losses from operations in 2008, we undertook several initiatives to lower our expenses to better match the forecasted reduction in revenues and improve liquidity in the fourth quarter 2008 and the first quarter 2009. We have restructured certain real estate lease contracts, reduced marketing and catalog expenses primarily by reducing the number of planned catalog mailings and the number of pages per catalog, delayed implementation of a new ERP system, renegotiated certain support contracts related to software maintenance and telecommunications, and lowered outside contractor fees as well as headcount in all areas of the Company. We reduced expenses by approximately $3 million in the first quarter 2009 and expect reduced expenses of approximately $15 million in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable periods in 2008.

•SG&A ~~Salaries~~expenses ~~and benefits expense~~ decreased by $12,~~757~~615,000, or 1811.85%, to $720,~~603~~091,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 from $922,~~360~~706,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008. ~~This~~As ~~decrease~~a ispercentage ~~related~~of tonet ~~a $720~~sales,~~000~~ ~~decrease~~SG&A ~~in salary and contract labor~~ expenses ~~and~~increased ato ~~$215,000~~65.1% ~~decrease~~ in ~~health~~the ~~care~~second ~~benefits~~quarter ~~and~~2009 ~~payroll~~from ~~taxes~~48.0% ~~that~~in ~~are~~the ~~primarily~~second quarter 2008, attributable to the ~~reduction~~decreased innet ~~work~~sales. ~~force~~The ~~implemented~~decreases in ~~January~~SG&A ~~2009~~are described below. In ~~addition,~~response ~~the~~to ~~decrease~~lower issales ~~related~~following tothe aeconomic ~~$472,000~~downturn ~~decrease~~and inresulting ~~commission~~losses ~~and~~from ~~bonus~~operations ~~expenses~~in 2008, ~~which~~we isundertook ~~primarily~~several ~~attributable~~initiatives to ~~the~~lower ~~decrease~~our inexpenses ~~net~~to ~~sales~~better ~~and~~match athe ~~$359,000~~forecasted ~~decrease~~reduction in ~~stock-based~~revenues ~~compensation~~and ~~expense.~~improve liquidity ~~The~~in ~~decrease~~the infourth ~~stock-based~~quarter ~~compensation~~2008 ~~expense~~and is2009. ~~partially~~We ~~the~~have ~~result~~restructured ofcertain ~~cancelled~~real ~~stock~~estate ~~options~~lease ~~due~~contracts, toreduced ~~the~~marketing ~~reduction~~and incatalog ~~work~~expenses ~~force~~primarily ~~and~~by reducing the ~~lower~~number ~~valuation~~ of ~~recently~~planned ~~issued~~catalog ~~stock~~mailings ~~options~~and ~~due to~~ the ~~lower~~number ~~price~~ of ~~our~~pages ~~common~~per ~~stock.~~catalog, ~~Incremental~~delayed implementation ~~salaries~~of ~~and~~a ~~benefits~~new ~~expense~~ERP ~~related~~system, torenegotiated ~~one~~certain ~~new~~support ~~outlet~~contracts ~~opened~~related into ~~the~~software ~~first~~maintenance ~~quarter~~and ~~2009~~telecommunications, ~~including~~and ~~pre-opening~~lowered ~~expenses,~~outside ~~two~~contractor ~~new~~fees ~~DWR:Tools~~as ~~for~~well ~~Living~~as ~~stores~~headcount ~~opened~~ in ~~the~~all ~~third~~areas ~~and~~of ~~fourth~~the ~~quarters~~company. ~~2008~~We ~~and~~reduced ~~two~~SG&A ~~studios~~expenses ~~opened~~by approximately $4.9 million in the ~~first~~second quarter ~~2008,~~2009 ~~which~~excluding ~~did~~charges ~~not~~for ~~operate~~impairment ~~during~~and ~~the~~future ~~entire~~lease ~~first~~liabilities ~~quarter~~of ~~2008, was approximately~~ $~~221,000~~2.3 ~~Salaries~~million, and ~~benefits~~expect ~~expense~~reduced isSG&A ~~expected~~expenses toof ~~decrease~~approximately $10 million in the remainder of 2009 ~~due to headcount reductions implemented in January 2009 with a planned reduction~~ from the prior comparable periods ~~period~~ in 2008 ~~of approximately $4,000,000~~.

• ~~Occupancy~~Salaries and ~~related~~benefits expense ~~increased~~decreased $~~372~~2,213,000, or 525.80%, to $6,~~735~~656,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 ~~compared~~from to $68,~~363~~869,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008. This ~~increase~~decrease is ~~due~~related to a $~~294~~1,212,000 ~~increase~~decrease in ~~rent~~salary and ~~operating~~contract labor expenses ~~for~~and ~~new~~a or$164,000 ~~relocated~~decrease ~~sales~~in ~~locations~~health ~~including~~care ~~one~~benefits ~~new~~and ~~outlet~~payroll ~~opened~~taxes inthat ~~the~~are ~~first~~primarily ~~quarter~~attributable ~~2009,~~to ~~two~~the ~~new~~reduction ~~DWR:Tools~~in ~~for~~work ~~Living~~force ~~stores~~implemented ~~opened~~ in ~~the~~January ~~third~~2009. ~~and~~In ~~fourth~~addition, ~~quarters~~the ~~2008~~decrease ~~and~~is ~~two~~related ~~studios~~to ~~opened~~a $466,000 decrease in ~~the~~commission ~~first~~and ~~quarter~~bonus ~~2008~~expenses, which ~~did~~is ~~not~~primarily ~~operate~~attributable ~~during~~to the ~~entire~~decrease ~~first~~in ~~quarter~~net ~~2008.~~sales, Ina ~~addition~~$152,000 wedecrease ~~relocated~~in ~~one~~recruiting, ~~studio~~relocation ~~with~~and ~~increased~~severance ~~rent~~expense and ~~operating~~a ~~expenses~~$199,000 decrease in ~~the~~stock-based ~~second~~compensation ~~quarter 2008~~expense. The ~~occupancy~~decrease ~~and~~in ~~related~~stock-based compensation expense ~~increase~~ is ~~also~~partially the result of cancelled stock options due to anthe ~~$81,000~~reduction ~~increase~~ in ~~depreciation~~work ~~expense~~force and the lower valuation of recently issued stock options due to the lower price of our common stock. ~~Occupancy~~The decrease in salaries and ~~related~~benefits expense isrelated ~~expected~~ to ~~increase~~one studio closed in ~~2009~~the ~~from~~fourth quarter 2008 asand the ~~result~~three ofstudios closed in the ~~recently~~second ~~opened~~quarter 2009 was approximately $115,000. Incremental salaries and benefits expense related to one new outlet opened in the first quarter 2009, including pre-opening expenses, and two new DWR:Tools for Living stores opened in the third and ~~one~~fourth ~~relocated~~quarters ~~studio~~2008, ~~opened~~was approximately $196,000. Salaries and benefits expense is expected to decrease in the remainder of 2009 due to headcount reductions implemented in January 2009 with a planned reduction from the prior comparable period in 2008 of approximately $2,500,000.

• ~~Catalog,~~Occupancy ~~advertising~~ and ~~promotion~~related expense ~~decreased~~increased $~~653~~54,000, or 190.98%, to $26,~~630~~670,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 ~~from~~compared to $36,~~283~~616,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008. This ~~decrease~~increase is due to a $~~300~~136,000 ~~decrease~~increase in ~~catalog~~rent ~~expense~~ and aoperating ~~$236,000~~expenses ~~decrease~~for innew ~~media~~or ~~advertising~~relocated ~~expense.~~sales ~~Direct~~locations ~~response~~including ~~catalog~~one ~~costs~~new ~~were~~outlet ~~recorded~~opened asin ~~prepaid catalog costs, and during~~ the first nine months of 2008 were amortized over their expected period of future benefit of approximately four months. In accordance with Statements of Position of the Accounting Standards Division No. 93-7, Reporting on Advertising Costs (“SOP 93-7”), advertising costs must be expensed unless the advertising elicits sales to customers. During the fourth quarter ~~2008,~~2009 weand notwo ~~longer~~new ~~adequately~~DWR:Tools ~~tracked~~for ~~the~~Living ~~required~~stores ~~information~~opened ~~required by SOP 93-7. Consequently, catalog costs were expensed as the catalogs were distributed~~ in the ~~fourth~~third ~~quarter 2008~~ and ~~first~~fourth ~~quarter~~quarters ~~2009~~2008. ~~The~~In ~~cost of catalogs distributed in the first quarter 2009 decreased by approximately $280~~addition,~~000~~ ~~from~~we ~~the~~relocated ~~cost~~one ofstudio ~~catalogs~~with ~~distributed~~increased inrent ~~the~~and ~~first~~operating ~~quarter~~expenses ~~2008. The number of catalogs we distributed~~ in the ~~first~~second quarter ~~2009 increased by 16% from~~ 2008. ~~However,~~This ~~the~~increase ~~increased costs from higher circulation~~ was partially offset by a ~~38%~~ decrease ~~in the total number~~ of ~~pages~~approximately of$103,000 ~~all catalogs distributed~~ in ~~the~~occupancy ~~first~~and ~~quarter~~related ~~2009~~expense ~~from~~due ~~2008.~~to Inclosing ~~addition,~~one westudio ~~distributed a relatively more expensive annual catalog~~ in the ~~first~~fourth quarter 2008 ~~without~~and athree ~~comparable~~studios ~~catalog~~ in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009. We plan to reduce overall spending on catalogs and advertising in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable period in 2008 by approximately $8,000,000 based on our initiative to lower our expenses including reduced advertising and fewer planned catalog mailings and fewer pages.

16• Catalog, advertising and promotion expense decreased $1,857,000, or 54.5%, to $1,551,000 in the second quarter 2009 from $3,408,000 in the second quarter 2008. This decrease is due to a $1,651,000 decrease in catalog expense and a $114,000 decrease in media advertising expense. Direct response catalog costs were recorded as prepaid catalog costs, and during the first nine months of 2008 were amortized over their expected period of future benefit of approximately four months. In accordance with Statements of Position of the Accounting Standards Division No. 93-7, Reporting on Advertising Costs (“SOP 93-7”), advertising costs must be expensed unless the advertising elicits sales to customers. During the fourth quarter 2008, we no longer adequately tracked the required information required by SOP 93-7. Consequently, catalog costs were expensed as the catalogs were distributed in the fourth quarter 2008 and first half of 2009. The cost of catalogs distributed in the second quarter 2009 decreased by approximately $1,425,000 from the cost of catalogs distributed in the second quarter 2008. The number of catalogs and the total number of pages of all catalogs distributed in the second quarter 2009 decreased from 2008 by 41% and 69%, respectively. We plan to reduce overall spending on catalogs and advertising in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable period in 2008 by approximately $5,500,000 based on our initiative to lower our expenses including reduced advertising and fewer planned catalog mailings and fewer pages.

• Other expense ~~decreased~~increased $~~777~~1,019,000, or 2329.4%, to $24,~~542~~485,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 compared to $3,~~319~~466,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008. The ~~decrease~~increase is primarily due to aimpairment ~~$348,000~~charges ~~decrease~~of ~~in merchant fees, a~~ $~~256~~1,226,000 ~~decrease~~for inleasehold ~~supplies~~improvements ~~and~~related ~~the cost of distributing merchandise~~ to ~~our~~three ~~warehouse~~closed ~~sales events,~~ studios, and ~~new~~five ~~DWR:Tools~~other ~~for~~studios ~~Living~~with ~~stores,~~continuing alosses ~~$182,000~~and ~~decrease~~charges inof ~~travel-related expense, a~~ $~~114~~1,024,000 ~~decrease~~for infuture ~~bad~~rent ~~debt~~payments ~~expense,~~related ~~and~~to athe ~~$104,000~~three ~~decrease~~closed studios in ~~telephone~~the ~~and~~second ~~telecommunication~~quarter ~~expense~~2009. This ~~decrease~~increase was partially offset by ana ~~increase of~~ $~~181~~373,000 decrease in ~~software~~merchant ~~and~~fees, ~~website-related~~a ~~expenses and charges of~~ $73218,000 ~~for~~decrease ~~impairment of leasehold improvements due to closing of our Southlake, Texas studio~~ in ~~the~~supplies ~~second~~and ~~quarter 2009. We also closed our Tigard, Oregon studio during~~ the ~~second~~cost ~~quarter~~of ~~2009.~~distributing Wemerchandise ~~incurred impairment charges related~~ to ~~the~~our ~~leasehold~~retail ~~improvements~~locations, ~~for~~a ~~the Tigard~~$193,000 ~~Oregon~~decrease ~~studio~~ in ~~2008.~~travel-related ~~In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 146~~expense, ~~Accounting~~a ~~for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“FAS 146”)~~$180,000 adecrease ~~liability~~in ~~for~~software ~~costs that will continue to be incurred under the lease agreement for the remaining term without economic benefit to the Company must be recognized~~ and ~~measured at the lease’s fair value at the cease~~website-~~use~~related ~~date.~~expenses, Weand ~~will~~a ~~record~~$96,000 ~~additional~~decrease ~~charges~~ in ~~the~~telephone ~~second~~and ~~quarter~~telecommunication ~~2009 for future lease payments at the cease-use date in accordance with FAS 146~~expense. ~~Excluding~~We ~~any impairment charges, we~~ plan to reduce overall spending in other SG&A expenses in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable period in 2008 by approximately $32,000,000 based on our initiative to lower our expenses including reduced travel-related expense, information technology expenses and costs of distributing merchandise to our ~~warehouse~~retail ~~sales events, studios, and DWR:Tools for Living stores~~locations.

• Professional, accounting, legal and SOX expense ~~decreased~~increased $~~341~~382,000, or 33110.01%, to $~~693~~729,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 compared to $1347,~~034,~~000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008. The ~~decrease~~increase is ~~primarily~~ due to a $~~363~~269,000 ~~decrease~~increase in ~~accounting~~legal expenses and a $140,000 increase in consulting fees ~~directly~~primarily related to ~~SEC~~advisors ~~reporting~~to the board of directors and ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~management ~~Act~~regarding ofa ~~2002~~financing ~~compliance~~event.

Interest and Other Income and Expenses

We had no significant interest income in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 compared to interest income of $5740,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008 due to significantly less invested capital ~~and lower interest rates~~. In the ~~first~~second quarter 2009, excess cash balances were used to pay down borrowings under our loan agreement compared to being swept into an interest bearing investment account in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008. Interest expense increased $6625,000 to $~~114~~95,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 compared to $4870,000 in the ~~first~~ second quarter 2008 , primarily due to increased borrowings under our loan agreement. WeOther ~~had~~expense noof ~~significant~~$52,000 ~~other income (expense)~~ in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009. ~~Other~~and ~~expense~~other income of $~~144~~101,000 in the ~~first~~second quarter 2008 primarily ~~consists~~consist of foreign currency exchange ~~losses~~ ~~related~~gains toor ~~the~~losses ~~value~~related ~~of the dollar decreasing approximately 7% relative~~ to currency ~~the Euro~~fluctuations.

Income Taxes

No income tax benefit was recognized in the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 because it was uncertain whether the tax benefit of the year-to-date pre-tax loss would be realized. In the ~~first~~second quarter 2008, we recorded a tax benefit of $~~696~~541,000. Utilization ~~calculated~~of at the ~~projected~~net ~~annual~~operating ~~effective~~losses and tax ~~rate~~credits ofwill ~~52.8%.~~be ~~The~~subject ~~difference~~to ~~between~~a substantial annual limitation due to the ~~statutory~~ownership ~~rate~~change oflimitations ~~39.5%~~provided by Sections 382 and ~~effective~~383 ~~tax~~of ~~rate~~the ~~was~~Internal ~~primarily~~Revenue ~~due~~Code toand ~~projected~~similar state provisions because of ~~stock-based~~our ~~compensation~~$15,000,000 ~~expense~~financing ~~related~~on toAugust 3, ~~incentive~~2009. ~~stock~~The ~~options~~annual ~~not~~limitation ~~being~~may ~~deductible~~result ~~for~~in the expiration of net operating losses and tax ~~purposes~~credits before utilization.

Comparison of the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 to the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008

Net Sales


	Twenty-six weeks ended
(amounts in thousands, except percentages)	July 4, 2009		% of Net Sales	June 28, 2008		% of Net Sales	Change		% Change
Studio sales	$	45,627	70.3%	$	63,931	67.9%	$	(18,304)	(28.6)%
Online sales		9,283	14.3%		12,603	13.4%		(3,320)	(26.3)%
Phone sales		4,476	6.9%		8,427	8.9%		(3,951)	(46.9)%
Other sales		3,129	4.8%		3,201	3.4%		(72)	(2.2)%
Shipping and handling fees		2,422	3.7%		6,012	6.4%		(3,590)	(59.7)%

Net sales	$	64,937	100.0%	$	94,174	100.0%	$	(29,237)	(31.0)%

Net sales decreased $29,237,000, or 31.0%, to $64,937,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 from $94,174,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. The decrease in the combined net sales of our three sales points (studio, online and phone) is related to a 10% decrease in the number of units of merchandise shipped, a decrease in prices due to an increase in promotional discounts and a change in product mix to a relative higher volume of lower priced DWR:Tools for Living merchandise. The average revenue per unit of product sold decreased by 23%. All of these factors are attributed to the impact of the unfavorable economy. Studio sales decreased $18,304,000, or 28.6%, in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. We opened one new outlet in the first quarter 2009 and relocated one studio and closed three studios during the second quarter 2009. We had 63 studios, two DWR:Tools for Living stores and three outlets open at the end of the second quarter 2009 compared to 68 studios and one outlet open at the end of the second quarter 2008. Online sales decreased $3,320,000, or 26.3%, and phone sales decreased $3,951,000, or 46.9%, in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008.

Other sales decreased $72,000, or 2.2%, in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. This decrease is primarily related to a decrease of $343,000 from warehouse sales, partially offset, by an increase of $248,000 in sales generated from our outlets including our recently opened Palm Springs outlet. Shipping and handling fees for delivery of merchandise decreased $3,590,000, or 59.7%, in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008, primarily attributable to the decrease in product sales and an increase in the amount of promotional free shipping.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales decreased by $12,281,000, or 24.5%, to $37,782,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 from $50,063,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. The decrease in cost of sales is attributable to the decrease in net sales. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased 5.0 percentage points to 58.2% in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 from 53.2% in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008, primarily attributable to increased promotional sales discounts and negative margins on shipping because of promotional free shipping. Shipping margins were negative in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008. We expect cost of sales as a percentage of net sales to increase in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2008 as we utilize more promotional sales discounts and free shipping than the third quarter of 2008.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)


	Twenty-six weeks ended
(amounts in thousands, except percentages)	July 4, 2009		% of Net Sales	June 28, 2008		% of Net Sales	Change		% Change
Salaries and benefits	$	14,259	22.0%	$	18,229	19.4%	$	(3,970)	(21.8)%
Occupancy and related expense		13,405	20.6%		12,979	13.8%		426	3.3 %
Catalog, advertising and promotion		4,181	6.4%		6,691	7.1%		(2,510)	(37.5)%
Other expenses		7,027	10.8%		6,785	7.2%		242	3.6 %
Professional - legal, consulting, SOX		1,422	2.2%		1,381	1.5%		41	3.0 %

Total SG&A	$	40,294	62.1%	$	46,065	48.9%	$	(5,771)	(12.5)%

SG&A expenses decreased by $5,771,000, or 12.5%, to $40,294,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 from $46,065,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses increased to 62.1% in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 from 48.9% in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008, attributable to the decreased net sales. The decreases in SG&A are described below. In response to lower sales following the economic downturn and resulting losses from operations in 2008, we undertook several initiatives to lower our expenses to better match the forecasted reduction in revenues and improve liquidity in the fourth quarter 2008 and 2009. We have restructured certain real estate lease contracts, reduced marketing and catalog expenses primarily by reducing the number of planned catalog mailings and the number of pages per catalog, delayed implementation of a new ERP system, renegotiated certain support contracts related to software maintenance and telecommunications, and lowered outside contractor fees as well as headcount in all areas of the company. We reduced SG&A expenses by approximately $8.1 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 excluding charges for impairment and future lease liabilities of $2,323,000, and expect reduced SG&A expenses of approximately $10 million in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable periods in 2008.

•

Salaries and benefits expense decreased $3,970,000, or 21.8%, to $14,259,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 from $18,229,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. This decrease is related to a $1,932,000 decrease in salary and contract labor expenses and a $379,000 decrease in health care benefits and payroll taxes that are primarily attributable to the reduction in work force implemented in January 2009. In addition, the decrease is related to a $938,000 decrease in commission and bonus expenses, which is primarily attributable to the decrease in net sales, a $111,000 decrease in recruiting, relocation and severance expense and a $558,000 decrease in stock-based compensation expense. The decrease in stock-based compensation expense is partially the result of cancelled stock options due to the reduction in work force and the lower valuation of recently issued stock options due to the lower price of our common stock. The decrease in salaries and benefits expense related to one studio closed in the fourth quarter 2008 and the three studios closed in the second quarter 2009 was approximately $168,000. Incremental salaries and benefits expense related to one new outlet opened in the first quarter 2009, including pre-opening expenses, two new DWR:Tools for Living stores opened in the third and fourth quarters 2008, and two studios opened in the first quarter 2008, which operated less than six months in the comparable period in 2008, was approximately $415,000. Salaries and benefits expense is expected to decrease in the remainder of 2009 due to headcount reductions implemented in January 2009 with a planned reduction from the prior comparable period in 2008 of approximately $2,500,000.

•

Occupancy and related expense increased $426,000, or 3.3%, to $13,405,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to $12,979,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. This increase is due to a $431,000 increase in rent and operating expenses for new or relocated sales locations including one new outlet opened in the first quarter 2009, two new DWR:Tools for Living stores opened in the third and fourth quarters 2008, and two studios opened in the first quarter 2008 which operated less than six months in the comparable period in 2008. In addition, we relocated one studio with increased rent and operating expenses in the second quarter 2008. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $156,000 in occupancy and related expense due to closing one studio in the fourth quarter 2008 and three studios in the second quarter 2009. Occupancy and related expense is expected to approximately remain the same in 2009 from 2008 as the result of the increased cost of recently opened retail locations being offset by the decreased costs of closed studios.

•

Catalog, advertising and promotion expense decreased $2,510,000, or 37.5%, to $4,181,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 from $6,691,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. This decrease is due to a $1,952,000 decrease in catalog expense and a $350,000 decrease in media advertising expense. Direct response catalog costs were recorded as prepaid catalog costs, and during the first nine months of 2008 were amortized over their expected period of future benefit of approximately four months. In accordance with Statements of Position of the Accounting Standards Division No. 93-7, Reporting on Advertising Costs (“SOP 93-7”), advertising costs must be expensed unless the advertising elicits sales to customers. During the fourth quarter 2008, we no longer adequately tracked the required information required by SOP 93-7. Consequently, catalog costs were expensed as the catalogs were distributed in the fourth quarter 2008 and first half of 2009. The cost of catalogs distributed in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 decreased by approximately $1,699,000 from the cost of catalogs distributed in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. The number of catalogs and the total number of pages of all catalogs distributed in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 decreased from the comparable period in 2008 by 11% and 49%, respectively. In addition, we distributed a relatively more expensive annual catalog in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008 without a comparable catalog in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009. We plan to reduce overall spending on catalogs and advertising in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable period in 2008 by approximately $5,500,000 based on our initiative to lower our expenses including reduced advertising and fewer planned catalog mailings and fewer pages.

•

Other expense increased $242,000, or 3.6%, to $7,027,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to $6,785,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. The increase is primarily due to impairment charges of $1,299,000 for leasehold improvements related to three closed studios and five other studios with continuing losses and charges of $1,024,000 for future rent payments related to the three closed studios in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009. This increase was partially offset by a $721,000 decrease in merchant fees, a $473,000 decrease in supplies and the cost of distributing merchandise to our retail locations, a $375,000 decrease in travel-related expense and a $205,000 decrease in telephone and telecommunication expense. We plan to reduce overall spending in other SG&A expenses in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable period in 2008 by approximately $2,000,000 based on our initiative to lower our expenses including reduced travel-related expense, information technology expenses and costs of distributing merchandise to our retail locations.

•

Professional, accounting, legal and SOX expense increased $41,000, or 3.0%, to $1,422,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to $1,381,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. The increase is primarily due to a $287,000 increase in legal expenses, partially offset by a $210,000 decrease in accounting fees directly related to SEC reporting and Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 compliance.

Interest and Other Income and Expenses

We had no significant interest income in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to interest income of $97,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008 due to significantly less invested capital. In the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009, excess cash balances were used to pay down borrowings under our loan agreement compared to being swept into an interest bearing investment account in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. Interest expense increased $91,000 to $209,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to $118,000 in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008, primarily due to increased borrowings under our loan agreement. Other expense of $49,000 in the second quarter 2009 and $43,000 in the second quarter 2008 primarily consists of foreign currency exchange losses related to currency fluctuations.

Income Taxes

No income tax benefit was recognized in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 because it was uncertain whether the tax benefit of the year-to-date pre-tax loss would be realized. We recorded a tax benefit of $1,237,000 calculated at the projected annual effective tax rate of 61.3% in the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008. The difference between the statutory rate of 39.5% and effective tax rate is primarily due to projected stock-based compensation expense related to incentive stock options not being deductible for tax purposes. Utilization of the net operating losses and tax credits is subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions because of our $15,000,000 financing on August 3, 2009. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses and tax credits before utilization.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents were $3464,~~099,~~000 and $67,~~496~~070,000 as of ~~April~~July 4, 2009 and ~~March~~June 2928, 2008, respectively.

Working capital

Working capital was $4764,~~910,~~000 and $24,~~743~~359,000 as of ~~April~~July 4, 2009 and ~~March~~June 2928, 2008, respectively. The decrease in working capital is primarily the result of significant operating losses incurred in the ~~second~~ third quarter 2008 through the ~~fourth~~second quarter ~~2008 and the first quarter~~ 2009. Specific component changes in working capital were increased borrowings of $73,~~149~~161,000 under the loan agreement and decreased inventory of $1113,~~132~~367,000 and cash of $6,606,000.

Cash flows

Net cash provided by (used in):

	Thirteen weeks ended
	Twenty-six weeks ended
(amounts in thousands)	~~April~~July 4, 2009		~~March~~June 2928, 2008
Operating activities	$	~~1,350~~981	$	(~~401~~545)
Investing activities		(~~720~~947)		(12,~~196~~541)
Financing activities		(68,~~215~~254)		24,~~442~~505

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities of $1981,~~350,~~000 in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended July 4, 2009 was primarily attributable to a reduction of inventory of $611,~~511~~935,000 that was offset by the net loss ~~from~~of ~~operations~~$13,397,000 reduced by non-cash charges of $52,~~984~~323,000 for impairment of leasehold improvements and future rent payment liabilities. Net cash used in operating activities of $~~401~~545,000 in the twenty-six ~~first~~weeks ~~quarter~~ended June 28, 2008 was primarily attributable to the net loss from operations in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended June 28, 2008.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was for the purchase of property and equipment related to our new outlet and studios, and information technology systems in the amounts of $~~720~~947,000 and $12,~~196~~541,000 in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended July 4 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively. We opened one new outlet in the first quarter 2009 and relocated one studio in the second quarter 2009. We opened two new studios in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended June 28, 2008. On April 1, 2008, we launched our website on a new platform and on May 12, 2008, we installed a new warehousing and distribution system at our fulfillment center.

~~For~~24 the remainder of fiscal year 2009, we anticipate that our investment in property and equipment will be approximately $500,000, primarily to relocate one studio in the second quarter 2009. We plan to finance this investment from borrowings under our revolving line of credit facility.

Our current plan for our investment in property and equipment in the remainder of fiscal year 2009 is approximately $300,000, primarily to pay for relocating one studio in the second quarter 2009. However, we plan to evaluate our time frame for implementation of a new ERP system in the third quarter 2009 and may invest in our information technology systems in the fourth quarter 2009. We currently do not know the amount of such investment, if any. We plan to finance this investment from cash received from our $15,000,000 financing on August 3, 2009.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended July 4, 2009 was primarily comprised of repayment of borrowings under our loan agreement of $46,~~266~~131,000, the restriction of $2,000,000 of cash related to our loan agreement and repayment of long-term obligations of $~~207~~392,000. Net cash provided by financing activities in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended June 28, 2008 was primarily comprised of borrowings of $24,~~534~~657,000 under our loan agreement.

On July 20, 2009, we entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to a private placement of shares of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock. On August 3, 2009, Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC, an affiliate of Glenhill Capital Management, LLC, or the Investor, invested $15,000,000 of additional capital into the company. The Investor purchased 15,400,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.15 per share and 1,000,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $12.69 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock, into 137,409,132 shares of common stock which, together with the 15,400,000 shares of common stock issued to the Investor in connection with the transaction, equal 91.33% of our outstanding common stock.

Cash Availability and Liquidity

As of ~~April~~July 4, 2009, we had available $62,~~935~~883,000 in working capital resources for our future cash needs as follows:

• approximately $3464,~~099,~~000 in cash and cash equivalents; and

• approximately $32,~~836~~419,000 in availability under our working capital line of credit.

18In response to lower sales following the economic downturn and resulting losses from operations in 2008, we undertook several initiatives to lower our expenses to better match the forecasted reduction in revenues and improve liquidity in the fourth quarter 2008 and 2009. We have restructured certain real estate lease contracts, reduced marketing and catalog expenses primarily by reducing the number of planned catalog mailings and the number of pages per catalog, delayed implementation of a new ERP system, renegotiated certain support contracts related to software maintenance and telecommunications, and lowered outside contractor fees as well as headcount in all areas of the company. Excluding charges for impairment and future lease liabilities of $2,323,000, we reduced selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $8.1 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2009 and expect reduced selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $10 million in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable periods in 2008. We also reduced inventory levels significantly from year-end 2008 levels to generate additional liquidity. As a result, we were able to generate cash from operating activities in the first half of 2009. However, at July 4, 2009 there were insufficient assets that could be liquidated to support ongoing operational loss and without additional equity, it was highly unlikely that the company could continue as a going concern. We subsequently raised $15,000,000 of equity financing on August 3, 2009, of which, $5,000,000 will be used to pay down our loan agreement with Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC. This equity should be sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months.

InAs ~~response~~a toresult ~~lower~~of ~~sales~~the ~~following~~challenging ~~the~~market and economic ~~downturn~~conditions, ~~and~~concern ~~resulting~~about ~~losses~~the ~~from~~stability ~~operations~~of inthe ~~2008,~~markets wegenerally ~~undertook~~and ~~several~~the ~~initiatives~~strength toof ~~lower~~counterparties ~~our~~specifically ~~expenses~~has toled ~~better~~many ~~match~~lenders ~~the~~and ~~forecasted~~institutional ~~reduction~~investors into ~~revenues~~reduce, and ~~improve liquidity~~ in ~~the~~some ~~fourth~~cases, ~~quarter~~cease ~~2008~~to ~~and~~provide ~~the~~funding ~~first~~to ~~quarter 2009~~borrowers. In Weaddition, ~~have~~many ~~restructured~~vendors ~~certain~~in ~~real~~our ~~estate~~industry ~~lease~~have ~~contracts, reduced~~begun ~~marketing~~to ~~and~~provide ~~catalog~~less favorable ~~expenses~~payment ~~primarily~~terms. Continued byturbulence ~~reducing~~in the ~~number~~United ofStates ~~planned~~and ~~catalog~~international ~~mailings~~markets and ~~the~~economies ~~number~~may ofadversely ~~pages~~affect ~~per~~the ~~catalog,~~liquidity ~~delayed~~and ~~implementation~~financial condition of aour ~~new ERP system~~lenders, ~~renegotiated~~vendors ~~certain~~and ~~support~~our ~~contracts~~access ~~related~~ to ~~software maintenance~~credit ~~and~~from ~~telecommunications,~~our lenders and vendors. If ~~lowered~~these ~~outside~~market ~~contractor~~conditions ~~fees~~continue, asthey ~~well~~may aslimit ~~headcount~~our inability, ~~all~~and ~~areas of~~ the ~~Company.~~ability Weof ~~reduced~~our ~~expenses~~lenders byand ~~approximately~~vendors $3to ~~million~~timely inreplace ~~the~~maturing ~~first~~liabilities, ~~quarter 2009~~ and ~~expect~~access ~~reduced expenses of approximately $15 million in~~ the ~~remainder~~capital ofmarkets ~~2009~~to ~~from~~meet ~~the~~liquidity ~~prior~~needs, ~~comparable~~resulting ~~periods~~ in ~~2008.~~an Weadverse ~~also~~effects on ~~reduced~~our ~~inventory levels significantly from year-end 2008 levels to generate additional~~ liquidity~~. However~~, iffinancial wecondition ~~fail to generate sales~~ and ~~margins~~results atof ~~levels currently~~operations. ~~forecasted~~There orcan dobe ~~not~~no ~~obtain~~assurance ~~additional~~that ~~debt~~access orto ~~equity~~our ~~financing,~~working itcapital isline ~~unlikely~~of ~~that~~credit we will not be ~~able~~impacted toby ~~maintain~~adverse ~~sufficient~~conditions ~~liquidity~~in tothe ~~continue~~financial ~~as a going concern~~markets.

As a result of the challenging market and economic conditions, concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically has led many lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide funding to borrowers. In addition, many vendors in our industry have begun to provide less favorable payment terms. Continued turbulence in the United States and international markets and economies may adversely affect the liquidity and financial condition of our lenders, vendors and our access to credit from our lenders and vendors. If these market conditions continue, they may limit our ability, and the ability of our lenders and vendors to timely replace maturing liabilities, and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, resulting in an adverse effects on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

In the United States, recent market and economic conditions have been unprecedented and challenging with tighter credit conditions, and more frequent and lower reappraisals of inventories on which advance rates under our credit line are determined. In addition, large financial institutions have declared bankruptcy or are under government conservatorship. There can be no assurance that access to our working capital line of credit will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

We are currently in compliance with all of our debt covenants. If Wells Fargo increases reserves or reduces the advance rate due on our credit line by a material amount and we are unable to reduce outstanding borrowings to the reduced level of availability, or an event of default occurs, there can be no assurance that Wells Fargo will not demand repayment of the line of credit or take assets secured by our borrowing.

Commitments and Contractual Obligations

On February 2, 2007, we entered into a Loan, Guaranty and Security Agreement, or the Loan Agreement, with Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC, or Wells Fargo. The Loan Agreement expires on February 2, 2012 and provides for an ~~initial~~ overall credit line up to $20,000,000 ~~which may be increased to $25,000,000 at our option, provided we are not in default on the Loan Agreement~~. The Loan Agreement consists of a revolving credit line and letters of credit up to $5,000,000. The amount we may borrow at any time under the Loan Agreement is based upon a percentage of eligible inventory and accounts receivable less certain reserves. Advance rates under the credit line are, in part, determined by third party appraisals of the net liquidation value of our inventories. Borrowings are secured by the right, title and interest to all of our personal property, including cash, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, fixtures, general intangibles and intellectual property. The Loan Agreement contains various restrictive covenants, including minimum availability, restrictions on payment of dividends, limitations on indebtedness, limitations on subordinated indebtedness and limitations on the amount of capital expenditures we may incur in any fiscal year. We are currently in compliance with all of these restrictive covenants.

InOn ~~the~~March 18, ~~fourth~~2009, ~~quarter~~we ~~2008~~entered ~~and~~into ~~the~~a first ~~quarter~~amendment to the Loan Agreement and a securities account ~~2009,~~availability ~~bank-commissioned~~agreement ~~appraisals~~with ~~determined~~Wells ~~that~~Fargo ~~the~~in ~~net~~which ~~liquidation~~Wells ~~value~~Fargo increased the amount of advances otherwise available to us by $1,000,000 in exchange for our ~~inventories~~granting ~~had~~Wells ~~declined~~Fargo ~~due~~collateral torights ~~general~~on ~~market~~a ~~conditions~~deposit ~~and,~~account aswith a ~~result~~balance of $2,187,000 as of July 4, 2009. Wells Fargo ~~reduced~~permitted ~~our~~us ~~advance~~to ~~rates~~withdraw amounts from this account in excess of $2,000,000 ~~which~~as ~~constricted~~long ~~the~~as ~~availability~~no default or event of ~~borrowings~~default has occurred. Accordingly, we classified $2,000,000 of cash to restricted cash. If Wells Fargo ~~under~~increases reserves or reduces the ~~line~~advance ofrate due on our credit. ~~The~~line by a material amount and we are unable to reduce outstanding borrowings to the reduced level of availability, or an event of ~~borrowings~~default ~~would~~occurs, ~~decrease~~there ifcan ~~subsequent~~be ~~appraisals~~no ~~determine~~assurance that ~~the~~Wells Fargo ~~net~~will ~~liquidation~~not ~~value~~demand repayment of ~~our~~the ~~inventories~~line ~~has~~of ~~decreased~~credit or take assets secured by our borrowing.

19On August 4, 2009, we entered into a Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement and Waiver with Wells Fargo, in which Wells Fargo consented to the $15,000,000 financing of which $5,000,000 will be used to pay down the Loan Agreement. In addition, the Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement removes collateral rights to the deposit account contained in the first amendment to the Loan Agreement, lowered the borrowing base and eligible in-transit inventory and increased minimum availability, letter of credit costs, the unused credit line fee and the interest rate that we pay on borrowings.

As of August 4, 2009, interest on borrowings will be based upon average availability either at a base rate plus 2% to 2.5%, or LIBOR plus 3% to 3.5%, and the unused credit line fee is 0.5%. The base rate is the greater of Wells Fargo’s prime rate or the Federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%. In the event of default, our interest rate will be increased by two percentage points. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings at July 4, 2009 was 3.25%, which increased to 5.5% on August 4, 2009. As of July 4, 2009, we had outstanding borrowings of $7,818,000 under the revolving credit line and $1,523,000 in outstanding letters of credit. Approximately $2,419,000 was available for advances under the revolving credit line as of July 4, 2009.

~~Wells~~In ~~Fargo~~the ~~increased~~fourth ~~discretionary~~quarter ~~reserves~~2008 byand ~~$1,500,000 in~~ the first ~~quarter~~half ~~2009.~~of ~~On March 18,~~ 2009, webank-commissioned ~~entered~~appraisals ~~into~~determined athat ~~first amendment to~~ the net ~~Loan~~liquidation ~~Agreement~~value ~~and a securities account availability agreement with Wells Fargo in which Wells Fargo increased the amount~~ of ~~advances otherwise available to us by $1,000,000 in exchange for~~ our ~~granting Wells~~inventories ~~Fargo~~had ~~collateral~~declined ~~rights~~due ~~on a deposit account with a balance of approximately $4,678,000. Wells Fargo will permit us~~ to ~~withdraw~~general ~~amounts~~market ~~from~~conditions ~~this account in excess of $2~~and,~~000,000~~ ~~so long~~ as noa ~~default or event of default has occurred. Accordingly~~result, ~~we classified $2,000,000 of cash to restricted cash. In addition,~~ Wells Fargo ~~rescinded~~reduced ~~its~~our ~~decision~~advance ~~to require additional discretionary reserves of $1~~rates,~~500,000.~~ Onwhich ~~April 14,~~constricted ~~2009, we withdrew $1,000,000 from this account for working capital purposes. If Wells Fargo increases reserves or reduces~~ the ~~advance~~availability ~~rate~~of ~~due on our credit line by a material amount and we are unable to reduce outstanding~~ borrowings tounder the ~~reduced~~line ~~level~~ of ~~availability,~~credit. orThe anavailability ~~event~~ of ~~default~~borrowings ~~occurs,~~would ~~there~~decrease ~~can~~if besubsequent noappraisals ~~assurance~~determine that ~~Wells~~the ~~Fargo~~net ~~will~~liquidation ~~not~~value ~~demand repayment~~ of ~~the~~our ~~line~~inventories ofhas ~~credit or take assets secured by our borrowing~~decreased.

~~Interest~~In onJanuary ~~borrowings will be either at Wells Fargo’s prime rate~~2009, orwe financed ~~LIBOR~~the ~~plus~~second ~~1.25%~~and tothird ~~1.75%~~years ~~based~~of ~~upon~~a ~~average~~three ~~availability,~~year ~~and~~software ~~the~~license ~~unused credit line~~ fee ~~is 0.3%. In the event~~ of ~~default~~approximately $253,000 ~~our~~per ~~interest~~year ~~rates~~with ~~are~~a ~~increased~~promissory ~~by two percentage points~~note. As of ~~April~~July 4, 2009, ~~we had~~ outstanding borrowings ~~of $9,683,000~~ under ~~the~~this ~~revolving credit line~~ and ~~$1,318,000~~other innotes ~~outstanding~~were ~~letters of credit. Approximately~~ $393,~~836,~~000 ~~was~~with ~~available~~interest ~~for~~rates ~~advances~~ranging from ~~under~~2% ~~the~~to ~~revolving~~11% ~~credit line~~maturing asin ~~of April 4,~~ 2009.

InWe ~~January~~entered ~~2009,~~into weequipment ~~financed~~leases ~~the~~during ~~second~~fiscal ~~and third~~ years of2008 aand ~~three~~2007 ~~year~~with ~~software~~remaining ~~license~~capitalized ~~fee~~lease obligation payments of ~~approximately~~ $~~253~~267,000 ~~per~~including ~~year~~interest ~~with~~and aprincipal ~~promissory~~as ~~note. As~~ of ~~April~~July 4, 2009~~, outstanding borrowings under this and other notes were $261,000 with interest rates ranging from 2% to 11% maturing in 2009~~.

WeAs ~~entered~~of ~~into~~July 4, ~~equipment~~2009, ~~leases~~inventory ~~during~~purchase obligations ~~fiscal~~related ~~years~~to ~~2008~~open ~~and~~purchase ~~2007~~orders ~~with~~were ~~remaining~~approximately ~~capitalized~~$11,526,000, ~~lease~~commitments ~~obligation~~for ~~payments~~furniture, offixtures, and leasehold improvements related to studios were approximately $~~287~~186,000, ~~including~~and ~~interest~~commitments for software licenses, software maintenance, hosting, and ~~principal~~development asservices offor ~~April 4,~~various ~~2009~~information technology systems and website were approximately $963,000.

As of April 4, 2009, inventory purchase obligations related to open purchase orders were approximately $7,920,000, commitments for furniture, fixtures, and leasehold improvements related to studios were approximately $387,000, and commitments for software licenses, software maintenance, hosting, and development services for various information technology systems and website were approximately $1,316,000.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with ~~accounting principles~~ generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or US GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. See ~~the~~our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009, in the Notes to Financial Statements and Critical Accounting Estimates section for critical accounting estimates except as modified below.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue on the date on which we estimate that the product has been received by the customer and retain title to items and bear the risk of loss of shipments until delivery to our customers. We recognize shipping and handling fees charged to customers in net sales at the time products are estimated to have been received by customers. We take title to items drop shipped by vendors at the time of shipment and bear the risk of loss until delivery to customers. We use third-party freight carrier information to estimate standard delivery times to various locations throughout the United States and Canada. We record as deferred revenue the dollar amount of all shipments for a particular day, if based upon our estimated delivery time, such shipments, on average, are expected to be delivered after the end of the reporting period. As of ~~April~~July 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and ~~March~~June 2928, 2008, deferred revenue was $1,~~637~~609,000, $1,162,000 and $1,~~980~~954,000, respectively, and related deferred cost of sales was $~~890~~865,000, $572,000 and $1,~~024~~037,000, respectively.

20Sales are recorded net of expected product returns by customers. Our management must make estimates of potential future product returns related to current period revenue. We analyze historical returns, current economic trends, changes in customer demand and acceptance of products when evaluating the adequacy of the sales returns and other allowances in any accounting period. The returns allowance is recorded as a reduction to net sales for the estimated retail value of the projected product returns and as a reduction in cost of sales for the corresponding cost amount, less any reserve for estimated scrap. The reserves for estimated product returns were $465,000, $573,000 and $572,000 as of July 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.

~~Sales~~Recent ~~are~~Accounting ~~recorded~~Pronouncements net of expected product returns by customers. Our management must make estimates of potential future product returns related to current period revenue. We analyze historical returns, current economic trends, changes in customer demand and acceptance of products when evaluating the adequacy of the sales returns and other allowances in any accounting period. The returns allowance is recorded as a reduction to net sales for the estimated retail value of the projected product returns and as a reduction in cost of sales for the corresponding cost amount, less any reserve for estimated scrap. The reserves for estimated product returns were $532,000, $573,000 and $674,000 as of April 4, 2009, January 3, 2009 and March 29, 2008, respectively.

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement 165, Subsequent Events (“FAS 165”), to incorporate the accounting and disclosure requirements for subsequent events into U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FAS 165 introduces new terminology, defines a date through which management must evaluate subsequent events, and lists the circumstances under which an entity must recognize and disclose events or transactions occurring after the balance-sheet date. We adopted Statement 165 as of July 4, 2009, which was the required effective date.

We evaluated our July 4, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events through August 7, 2009, the date the financial statements were available to be issued. Other than the agreements and events noted below, we are not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. On July 20, 2009, we entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to a private placement of shares of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock. On August 3, 2009, Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC invested $15,000,000 of additional capital into the company in exchange for a 91.33% ownership stake. At July 4, 2009 there were insufficient assets that could be liquidated to support ongoing operational loss and without additional equity, it was highly unlikely that the company could continue as a going concern. On August 4, 2009, we entered into a Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement and Waiver with Wells Fargo, in which Wells Fargo consented to the $15,000,000 financing of which $5,000,000 will be used to pay down the Loan Agreement. Our negotiations and any settlement agreements subsequent to July 4, 2009 with our landlords for lease buy-outs influenced our determination that a settlement is highly likely and the calculation of any estimated potential settlement.

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“FAS 167”), to improve how enterprises account for and disclose their involvement with variable interest entities (VIE’s), which are special-purpose entities, and other entities whose equity at risk is insufficient or lack certain characteristics. Among other things, FAS 167 changes how an entity determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and whether that VIE should be consolidated. The new Statement requires an entity to provide significantly more disclosures about its involvement with VIE’s. As a result, we must comprehensively review our involvement with VIE’s and potential VIE’s, including entities previously considered to be qualifying special purpose entities, to determine the effect on our financial statements and related disclosures. FAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within the first annual reporting period. Earlier application is prohibited. Because we have no involvement with VIE’s, the adoption of FAS 167 will have no effect on our financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets: an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“FAS 166”). FAS 166 changes the derecognition guidance for transferors of financial assets, including entities that sponsor securitizations, to align that guidance with the original intent of FASB Statement 140, Accounting for the Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. FAS 166 also eliminates the exemption from consolidation for qualifying special-purpose entities (“QSPE’s”). As a result, all existing QSPE’s need to be evaluated to determine whether the QSPE should be consolidated in accordance with FAS 166. FAS 166 is effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The recognition and measurement provisions of FAS 166 must be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. Early application is prohibited. The new Statement also requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets that occur both before and after the effective date. Because we have no involvement with QSPE’s or transfers of financial assets, the adoption of FAS 166 will have no effect on our financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FAS Staff Position No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP 157-4”) to provide additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 emphasizes that, regardless of whether the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly and regardless of which valuation technique was used, the objective of a fair value measurement under FASB Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, remains the same, which is to estimate the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP 157-4 also requires expanded disclosures. FSP 157-4 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP 157-4 on April 5, 2009. Our financial assets and liabilities are typically measured using Level 1 inputs and as a result, the adoption of FSP 157-4 did not have any effect on our financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FAS Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”) to require, on an interim basis, disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for public entities. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 on April 5, 2009. The adoption FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not have any impact on the reporting of our results of operations.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

In the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended July 4, 2009, we generated more than 98% of our net sales in U.S. dollars, but we purchased approximately 3631% of our product inventories from manufacturers in foreign countries with 2016% of our product inventory purchases being paid for in Euros. Increases and decreases in the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro result in fluctuations in the cost to us of merchandise sourced from Europe. As a result of such currency fluctuations, we have experienced and may continue to experience fluctuations in our operating results on an annual and a quarterly basis going forward. Specifically, as the value of the U.S. dollar declines relative to the Euro, the effective cost for our product increases. As a result, declines in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro and other foreign currencies would increase our cost of sales and decrease our gross margin.

In the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended July 4, 2009, the value of the dollar has ~~increased~~remained approximately 4%the same relative to the Euro. We purchased foreign currency forward contracts to hedge our foreign currency risk in the first quarter 2008 through the third quarter 2008. In 2008, the value of the dollar increased approximately 5% relative to the Euro resulting in losses on some of those contracts and, as a result, we discontinued purchasing hedge contracts at the end of 2008. We do not hold any foreign currency forward contracts as of ~~April~~July 4, 2009. A hypothetical 1% increase or decrease in the Euro exchange rate with the dollar on January 4, 2009 would result in a change to cost of sales of approximately $6848,000 on an annualized basis if our product inventory purchases being paid for in Euros remained constant from the second quarter 2009 throughout 2009.

Interest Rate Risk

We have interest payable on our revolving line of credit. Amounts borrowed under this line of credit bear interest atbased anupon ~~annual~~average ~~rate~~availability ~~equal~~either at toa ~~the~~base ~~lender’s~~rate ~~prime~~plus ~~lending~~2% ~~rate~~to 2.5%, or LIBOR plus ~~1.25~~3% to 13.755%. ~~based~~The ~~upon~~base ~~average~~rate ~~availability~~is the greater of Wells Fargo’s prime rate or the Federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the future financing requirements. As of ~~April~~July 4, 2009, we had $97,~~683~~818,000 of outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit line at an interest rate of 3.25%, which increased to 5.5% on August 4, 2009. A hypothetical increase or decrease in interest rates by one percentage point on January 3, 2009 would result in ~~changes~~a change to our annual interest ~~expenses~~expense of approximately $2892,000, inif our outstanding loan balance remained constant throughout the ~~first~~remainder ~~quarter~~of 2009. ~~and~~If our interest rate was at the higher rate effective on August 4, 2009 of 5.5%, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $~~101~~207,000 on, ~~an annualized~~ if our outstanding loan balance remained constant throughout the remainder of 2009.

2129

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, in accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that control deficiencies which constituted material weaknesses at the end of fiscal year 2008, as discussed below, continued to exist in our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report. As a result of these material weaknesses, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report at the reasonable assurance level. In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analyses and other post-closing procedures to determine that our financial statements included in this report were prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

The certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The disclosures set forth in this Item 4 contain information concerning the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, internal control over financial reporting and changes in internal control over financial reporting referred to in those certifications. Those certifications should be read in conjunction with this Item 4 for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by the certifications.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

2230

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report. In making this assessment, management used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring.

Material Weaknesses and Remediation Initiatives

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management has discussed the material weaknesses and other deficiencies with our Audit Committee and performed significant additional substantive review as described below where it identified material weaknesses to gain assurance that the financial statements as included herein are fairly stated in all material respects. During our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report, management identified the following material weaknesses:

Control Activities

We had an entity level material weakness related to ineffective controls over the initiation, authorization, review, documentation and recording of the financial impact of material contracts. Specifically, we do not have a contract tracking system for material contracts entered into other than for purchase orders related to inventory commitments. This material weakness could impact selling, general and administrative expenses and capital expenditures.

As remediation initiative we have developed a process to review material contracts for appropriate financial statement treatment and disclosure and are in the process of implementing it. Specifically, in the ~~first~~fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2009 we have reviewed material contracts related to new real estate leases, real estate lease amendments, and website and information systems to adequately account for their financial impact.

Monitoring

We had an entity level material weakness related to insufficient oversight procedures performed by management of our internal controls. We did not maintain processes to verify that internal controls over financial reporting were performed correctly or in a timely and consistent basis.

As remediation initiative, in the ~~first~~fiscal quarter ~~2009~~ended July 4, 2009 we continued self testing and evaluation by process owners that was initiated in 2008. When a deficiency was discovered, we followed up with the parties involved and monitored corrective action and confirmed the control has been corrected and updated.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than these implementations, the improvements in our control environment during ~~the~~our ~~first~~fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2009 and the internal control implementation currently underway as discussed above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during ~~the~~our ~~first~~fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

2331

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors described below, as well as those discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Our business depends, in part, on factors affecting consumer spending that are not within our control and if current sales and margin trends are below our forecast, we may not be able to generate enough liquidity to sustain significant ongoing operating losses and continue operating as a going concern.

Our business depends on consumer demand for our products and, consequently, is sensitive to a number of factors that influence consumer spending. The recent downturn in the housing market, the turmoil in the credit markets, the decrease in consumer confidence and uncertainties in general economic conditions including the current recession, have adversely affected our sales. In addition, fewer customers are shopping at our studios, our website or through the catalog. Net sales decreased $1229,~~838~~237,000, or 2731.40%, in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended July 4, 2009 from the ~~first~~comparable ~~quarter~~period in 2008. The decrease in the combined net sales of our three sales points (studio, online and phone) is related to a decrease in the number of units of merchandise shipped by 510%, a decrease in prices due to an increase in promotional discounts and a change in product mix to a relative higher volume of lower priced DWR:Tools for Living merchandise. The average revenue per unit of product sold decreased by 23%. All of these factors are attributed to the impact of the unfavorable economy.

In response to lower sales following the economic downturn and resulting losses from operations in 2008, we undertook several initiatives to lower our expenses to better match the forecasted reduction in revenues and improve liquidity in the fourth quarter 2008 and ~~the first quarter~~ 2009. We have restructured certain real estate lease contracts, reduced marketing and catalog expenses primarily by reducing the number of planned catalog mailings and the number of pages per catalog, delayed implementation of a new ERP system, renegotiated certain support contracts related to software maintenance and telecommunications, and lowered outside contractor fees as well as headcount in all areas of the ~~Company~~company. We reduced selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $38.1 million in the ~~first~~twenty-six ~~quarter~~weeks ended July 4, 2009 excluding charges for impairment and future lease liabilities of $2,323,000, and expect reduced selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $1510 million in the remainder of 2009 from the prior comparable periods in 2008. We also reduced inventory levels significantly from year-end 2008 levels to generate additional liquidity. ~~However,~~As ifa result, we ~~fail~~were able to generate ~~sales~~cash ~~and~~from ~~margins~~operating activities in the first half of 2009. However, at ~~levels~~July 4, ~~currently~~2009 ~~forecasted~~there orwere doinsufficient ~~not~~assets ~~obtain~~that ~~additional~~could ~~debt~~be orliquidated ~~equity~~to support ongoing ~~financing~~operational loss and without additional equity, it iswas highly unlikely that wethe company could continue as a going concern. We subsequently raised $15,000,000 of equity financing on August 3, 2009, of which, $5,000,000 will be ~~able~~used to ~~maintain~~pay ~~sufficient~~down our ~~liquidity~~loan agreement with Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC. This equity should be sufficient to ~~continue~~fund asoperations afor ~~going~~at ~~concern~~least the next twelve months.

Wells Fargo may demand repayment of the line of credit or take assets secured by our borrowing.

2432

~~Our~~We ~~process~~voluntarily delisted our common stock from The NASDAQ Global Market, which could result in loss of ~~exploring~~investors, increased ~~strategic~~obligations ~~alternatives~~under ~~may~~state ~~not~~securities belaws ~~successful~~and decreased coverage by securities analysts.

InEffective ~~February~~as ~~2009~~of July 16, 2009, we ~~announced~~voluntarily ~~the~~delisted ~~engagement~~our ofcommon ~~Thomas~~stock ~~Weisel~~from ~~Partners~~The ~~LLC,~~Nasdaq anGlobal ~~investment~~Market. ~~banking~~The ~~firm,~~quotations tofor ~~assist~~our common stock now appear in the ~~review~~“Pink ofSheets.” ~~strategic alternatives,~~Delisting ~~including~~from ~~advice~~The ~~related~~Nasdaq toGlobal anMarket ~~unsolicited~~subjects ~~offer~~us weto ~~recently~~numerous ~~received.~~consequences Inthat ~~the~~may ~~review~~adversely affect ~~process~~our business, anincluding ~~independent~~the ~~committee~~loss of ~~the~~investors. ~~board~~We ~~has~~may ~~been~~no ~~and~~longer ~~will~~qualify ~~continue~~for toexemptions ~~consider~~from astate ~~full~~securities ~~range~~registration ofrequirements. ~~possible~~Without ~~alternatives,~~an ~~including,~~exemption ~~among~~from ~~other things~~registration, awe ~~possible~~may ~~sale,~~need ~~merger,~~to ~~strategic~~file ~~partnership~~time-consuming orand ~~refinancing.~~costly Weregistration statements ~~currently~~for ~~have~~future nosecurities ~~commitments~~transactions orand ~~agreements~~issuances ~~with~~and ~~respect~~ to ~~any~~amend ~~particular~~our ~~transaction,~~stock option and ~~there~~stock ~~can~~purchase beplans. noFurthermore, ~~assurance~~delisting ~~that~~may ~~our~~result ~~review~~in ofdecreased ~~strategic~~coverage ~~alternatives~~by ~~will~~securities ~~result in any transaction~~analysts.

We have a limited trading market, which could affect your ability to sell shares of our common stock and the price you may receive for our common stock.

There is currently a limited trading market for our common stock on the Pink Sheets. The ability to trade our common stock on the Pink Sheets depends on the presence and investment decisions of willing buyers and sellers. Therefore, the market of investors who are willing to purchase our common stock is limited, the volume of our common stock traded on a daily basis is low, and the liquidity of our common stock is limited. There can be no guarantee that our common stock will be accepted for quotation by any other quotation system, market or exchange. Prices for securities traded solely on the Pink Sheets may be difficult to obtain. As such, our stock has very limited liquidity and marketability. This very limited liquidity, marketability, the reduced public access to quotations for our common stock and lack of a regular trading market for our stock have depressed the market price of our common stock.

We may not have sufficient funds to pay our obligations to holders of our Series A Preferred Stock when they become due.

If our stockholders do not approve the increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock to permit full conversion of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, then on or after August 3, 2010, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled, in their sole discretion, to require us to redeem their shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the applicable liquidation preference. If our stockholders do not approve the increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock, the applicable liquidation preference per share of the Series A Preferred Stock will be equal to four times the purchase price of the Series A Preferred Stock plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends and increases in increments of 5% for each month in which we have not obtained such stockholder approval after October 2009, pro rated daily. We may not have sufficient funds to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock if such redemption becomes available. We may be required to obtain the funds necessary to redeem our Series A Preferred Stock through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities or the sale of assets. We may be unable to obtain the funds needed, if any, to pay these obligations from any one or more of these sources on favorable economic terms or at all. We have also granted Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC a preemptive right on any equity or equity-linked financings that we complete. This may impede our ability to secure additional funding because it may discourage third parties from making an offer. If we become obligated to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock and are unable to obtain funds to pay such obligations, we may be forced to dispose of assets or take other actions on disadvantageous terms, which could result in losses and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Because of its significant stock ownership, our largest stockholder can exert significant influence over our future direction.

On August 3, 2009, Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC purchased 15,400,000 shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of a new series of Series A 9% Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock, into 137,409,132 shares of our common stock which, together with the 15,400,000 shares of common stock issued to Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC in connection with the transaction, equal 91.33% of our outstanding common stock. Therefore, Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC will be able to significantly influence all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors, the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

We are required to register for resale shares of our common stock. If we fail to register the shares or the stockholders are unable to sell their shares under the registration statement after it becomes effective, we may be obligated to pay damages to the stockholders which could harm our financial condition.

We recently sold an aggregate of 15,400,000 shares of our common stock and preferred stock convertible into an additional 137,409,132 shares of our common stock in a private placement transaction. We are required to register the common stock and the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission within specified time frames. If the registration statement is not timely filed, or declared effective within the time frame described; the registration statement is suspended other than as permitted in the registration rights agreement; after effectiveness, the registration statement ceases to remain continuously effective for ten consecutive calendar days or fifteen calendar days in any twelve month period; or we fail to make current public information available, we may be obligated to pay damages equal to up to 2% of the share purchase price per month, subject to a maximum of $1.5 million. Any such payments could harm our financial condition.

We recently completed a private placement of shares of our common stock and a newly designated series of preferred stock. The agreements with the purchaser contain terms and covenants that have resulted in substantial dilution to our stockholders and which could harm our financial condition.

On August 3, 2009, we raised gross proceeds of $15,000,000 through the sale and issuance of 15,400,000 shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of a new series of preferred stock, designated Series A 9% Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible into an additional 137,409,132 shares of our common stock. While this private placement provided us with additional working capital required to fund continuing operations, the transaction was extremely dilutive to our existing stockholders and the agreements with the purchaser contain terms and covenants that could result in additional dilution to our stockholders, could render future financings and merger and acquisition transactions more difficult and could require us to expend substantial amounts of cash, even if then unavailable at the time such expenditure was required.

Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to an annual compounded dividend of 9% on each share of Series A Preferred Stock, payable in kind at the purchase price of the Series A Preferred Stock, annually in arrears. The annual dividend rate will automatically increase to 15% if our stockholders do not approve the necessary increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock to permit full conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock or a default by us on any of the material terms and conditions of the Series A Preferred Stock. While the fact that the annual dividend is payable in kind will help us to conserve our cash, the dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will result in additional dilution to our stockholders.

The Series A Preferred Stock is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution protection in connection with future issuances of equity securities, subject to customary exceptions. In addition, we have granted Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC a preemptive right on any equity or equity-linked financings that we complete. This may impede our ability to secure additional funding because it may discourage third parties from making an offer.

In the event of a merger or acquisition involving the company, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to a liquidation preference before any proceeds are paid to the holders of our common stock. The liquidation preference per share of the Series A Preferred Stock will be equal to the purchase price of the Series A Preferred Stock plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. However, if our stockholders do not approve the increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock to permit full conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, the liquidation preference per share of the Series A Preferred Stock will automatically increase to four times such amount and increases in increments of 5% for each month after October 2009, pro rated daily.

If our stockholders do not approve the increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock to permit full conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, then on or after August 3, 2010, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled, in their sole discretion, to require us to redeem their shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the then applicable liquidation preference. We may not have sufficient funds to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock if such redemption becomes available.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5.

Other Information

None.

2535

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Title
		Incorporated by Reference
3.01(1)	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
Exhibit Number	Exhibit Title	Form	Date	Number	FiledHerewith
3.02(2)	Amended and Restated Bylaws
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation	S-1	03/24/04	3.01
4.01(3)	Certificate of Designations for Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Design Within Reach, Inc.
3.2	Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A 9% Convertible Preferred Stock	8-K	08/05/09	3.1
4.02(3)	Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate
4.1	Rights Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2006, among Design Within Reach, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent, including the form of Certificate of Designations of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Design Within Reach, Inc. as Exhibit A, the form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares as Exhibit C	8-K	05/25/06	4.1
4.03(3)	Rights Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2006, among Design Within Reach, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent, including the form of Certificate of Designations of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Design Within Reach, Inc. as Exhibit A, the form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares as Exhibit C
4.2	Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate	8-K	05/25/06	4.2
4.04(4)	First Amendment dated December 13, 2007 to Rights Agreement dated May 23, 2006 between Design Within Reach, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company
4.3	First Amendment dated December 13, 2007 to Rights Agreement dated May 23, 2006 between Design Within Reach, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company	8-K	12/14/07	4.1
4.05(5)	Second Amendment dated February 12, 2009 to Rights Agreement dated May 23, 2006 between Design Within Reach, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company
4.4	Second Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2009, by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company	8-K	02/13/09	4.1
4.05(6)	Third Amendment dated April 30, 2009 to Rights Agreement dated May 23, 2006 between Design Within Reach, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company
4.5	Third Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2009, by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company	8-K	05/01/09	4.1
10.1(7)	First Amendment to Loan Guaranty and Security Agreement among Design Within Reach, Inc., the Lenders thereto and Wells Fargo Retail, Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent, dated as of March 18, 2009
4.6	Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 20, 2009 between Design Within Reach, Inc. and Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC	8-K	07/20/09	4.1
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
4.7	Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and between Design Within Reach, Inc. and Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC	8-K	07/20/09	4.2
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
4.8	Fourth Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of July 17, 2009, by and between Design Within Reach, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC	8-K	07/20/09	4.3
32*	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
4.9	Registration Rights Agreement dated August 3, 2009 between Design Within Reach, Inc. and Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC	8-K	08/05/09	4.1
(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-113903) filed on March 24, 2004, as amended.
10.1	Letter Agreement dated July 20, 2009 between Design Within Reach, Inc. and Glenhill Special Opportunities Master Fund LLC	8-K	07/20/09	10.1
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-113903) filed on June 1, 2004, as amended.
10.2	Form of Voting Agreement	8-K	07/20/09	10.2
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Design Within Reach’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2006.
10.3	Second Amendment to Loan Agreement and Waiver among Design Within Reach, Inc., the Lenders thereto and Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent, dated as of August 4, 2009	8-K	08/05/09	10.1
(4)	Incorporated by reference to Design Within Reach’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2007.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934				X
(5)	Incorporated by reference to Design Within Reach’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2009.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934				X
(6)	Incorporated by reference to Design Within Reach’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2009.
32*	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				X
(7)	Incorporated by reference to Design Within Reach’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2009.

These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this quarterly report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Design Within Reach, Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

2636

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: May 18, 2009				DESIGN WITHIN REACH, INC.
Dated: August 11, 2009				DESIGN WITHIN REACH, INC.
				/s/ Theodore R. Upland III
				Theodore R. Upland III
				Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
				(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)

2737

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · DESIGN WITHIN REACH INC