United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the thirteen -week period ended: ~~March~~September 3028, 2007

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

C-COR Incorporated

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Pennsylvania

0-10726

24-0811591

(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

60 Decibel Road

State College, PA

16801

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

(814) 238-2461

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer: ¨ Accelerated filer: x Non-accelerated filer: ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $.05 Par Value – 4950,~~563~~293,~~652~~140 shares outstanding as of ~~April~~October 2719, 2007.

C-COR Incorporated

		Page
Part I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		23
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:As of March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006		3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:As of September 28, 2007 and June 29, 2007		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:Thirteen Weeks Ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:Thirteen Weeks Ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:Thirty-nine Weeks Ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:Thirteen Weeks Ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006		6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:Thirty-nine Weeks Ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006		6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7-15
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7-19
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16-23
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		20-30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		31
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		31
Part II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors		3225-27
Item 6. Exhibits		3227
Signatures		3328

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

C-COR Incorporated:

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of C-COR Incorporated and subsidiaries as of ~~March~~September 3028, 2007, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations ~~for the thirteen week~~ and ~~thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006, and the related condensed consolidated statements of~~ cash flows for the ~~thirty~~thirteen-~~nine~~ week periods ended ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 and ~~March~~September 2429, 2006. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of C-COR Incorporated and subsidiaries as of June 3029, ~~2006~~ 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated September 1211, ~~2006~~2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 3029, ~~2006~~2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ KPMG LLP Harrisburg, Pennsylvania ~~May~~November 86, 2007

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

C-COR Incorporated

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	March 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
	September 28, 2007			June 29, 2007
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4460,~~447~~968		$	4454,~~658~~913
Restricted cash		34,~~594~~404			12,~~409~~563
Marketable securities		4771,~~108~~508			1653,~~270~~453
Accounts receivable, net		58,014			49,188
Accounts receivable		42,021			63,375
Unbilled receivables		21,~~908~~890			32,~~308~~268
Inventories		3623,~~009~~817			2528,~~437~~150
Deferred costs		79,~~848~~116			48,~~555~~476
Assets held for sale		—			303
Other current assets		4,415			4,935
Other current assets		3,185			4,239
Total current assets		218,139			218,133
Total current assets		203,113			149,367
Property, plant, and equipment, net		19,594			19,381
Property, plant, and equipment, net		20,359			20,074
Goodwill		128,610			128,825
Goodwill		131,034			131,209
Other intangible assets, net		1,216			1,849
Other intangible assets, net		2,648			5,135
Deferred taxes		458			778
Deferred taxes		424			497
Other long-term assets		6,507			7,754
Other long-term assets		5,675			6,847
Total assets	$	374,524		$	376,720
Total assets	$	363,253		$	313,129
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	2718,~~820~~553		$	2520,~~796~~699
Accrued liabilities		3223,~~490~~649			2631,~~423~~291
Deferred revenue		2928,~~984~~074			1932,~~674~~534
Deferred taxes		~~1,317~~194			~~374~~219
Liabilities held for sale		—			415
Current portion of long-term debt		391			384
Current portion of long-term debt		378			299
Total current liabilities		70,861			85,127
Total current liabilities		91,989			72,981
Long-term debt, less current portion		35,870			35,968
Long-term debt, less current portion		36,064			35,966
Deferred revenue		3,393			3,892
Deferred revenue		4,472			2,705
Deferred taxes		5,806			5,234
Deferred taxes		3,078			2,986
Other long-term liabilities		6,280			5,587
Other long-term liabilities		4,861			3,624
Total liabilities		122,210			135,808
Total liabilities		140,464			118,262
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 14)
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; authorized shares of 2,000,000; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.05 par value; authorized shares of 100,000,000; issued shares of 53,107,979 as of March 30, 2007 and 51,653,206 as of June 30, 2006		2,656			2,583
Common stock, $.05 par value; authorized shares of 100,000,000; issued shares of 53,934,050 at September 28, 2007 and 53,548,951 at June 29, 2007		2,697			2,677
Additional paid-in capital		~~395~~406,~~505~~010			~~383~~400,~~362~~185
Accumulated other comprehensive income		67,~~261~~206			56,~~362~~400
Accumulated deficit		(~~147~~129,~~240~~207	)		(~~162~~133,~~047~~958	)
Treasury stock at cost, 3,645,046 shares as of March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006		(34,393	)		(34,393	)
Treasury stock at cost, 3,644,980 shares at September 28, 2007 and June 29, 2007		(34,392	)		(34,392	)
Shareholders’ equity		222,789			194,867
Total shareholders’ equity		252,314			240,912
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	~~363~~374,~~253~~524		$	~~313~~376,~~129~~720

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

C-COR Incorporated

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007			March 24,2006
Net sales:
Products	$	56,260		$	35,765
Content and operations management systems		15,536			10,560
Services		10,897			14,057
Total net sales		82,693			60,382
Cost of sales:
Products		31,710			21,772
Content and operations management systems		6,564			6,105
Services		10,009			12,141
Excess and obsolete inventory charge		—			618
Total cost of sales		48,283			40,636
Gross margin		34,410			19,746
Operating expenses:
Selling and administrative		16,523			14,869
Research and product development		8,722			8,887
Amortization of other intangibles		829			912
Impairment of long-lived assets		—			1,792
Gain on sale of product line		—			(1,970	)
Restructuring charge		870			3,287
Total operating expenses		26,944			27,777
Income (loss) from operations		7,466			(8,031	)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense		(359	)		(341	)
Investment income		928			458
Foreign exchange gain (loss)		(270	)		465
Other income, net		304			177
Income (loss) before income taxes		8,069			(7,272	)
Income tax expense		708			676
Net income (loss)	$	7,361		$	(7,948	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.15		$	(0.17	)
Diluted	$	0.14		$	(0.17	)
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents:
Basic		49,080			47,896
Diluted		53,191			47,896

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

C-COR Incorporated

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007			March 24,2006
	September 28,2007			September 29,2006
Net sales:
Products	$	~~154~~51,~~213~~999		$	~~112~~46,~~952~~037
Content and operations management systems		4419,~~151~~006			3812,~~832~~744
Services		~~34,049~~922			381,~~760~~585
Total net sales		~~232~~71,~~413~~927			~~190~~60,~~544~~366
Cost of sales:
Products		9131,~~992~~966			7229,~~140~~201
Content and operations management systems		177,~~094~~869			204,~~034~~618
Services		~~31,401~~906			~~33,731~~974
Excess and obsolete inventory charge		—			8,354
Total cost of sales		40,741			34,793
Total cost of sales		140,487			134,259
Gross margin		31,186			25,573
Gross margin		91,926			56,285
Operating expenses:
Selling and administrative		4717,~~670~~024			5014,~~212~~397
Research and product development		248,~~230~~681			297,~~459~~200
Amortization of other intangibles		~~2,487~~633			~~3,706~~829
Impairment of long-lived assets		—			7,122
Loss on sale of product lines		—			245
Loss (gain) on sale of product line		245			(1,970	)
Restructuring costs		205			400
Restructuring charge		1,731			5,037
Total operating expenses		26,543			23,071
Total operating expenses		76,363			93,566
Income from operations		4,643			2,502
Income (loss) from operations		15,563			(37,281	)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense		(~~1,084~~341	)		(~~990~~360	)
Investment income		21,~~423~~506			~~1,081~~695
Foreign exchange gain (loss)		(126	)		218
Foreign exchange gain		527			30
Other income, net		~~389~~102			~~479~~71
Income (loss) before income taxes		17,165			(36,493	)
Income before income taxes		6,437			2,938
Income tax expense		~~2,358~~911			~~1,994~~764
Net income (loss)	$	14,807		$	(38,487	)
Income from continuing operations		5,526			2,174
Net income (loss) per share:
Discontinued operations, net of tax:
Basic	$	0.31		$	(0.80	)
Loss from discontinued operations		(536	)		(591	)
Diluted	$	0.30		$	(0.80	)
Total discontinued operations, net of tax		(536	)		(591	)
Net income	$	4,990		$	1,583
Net income (loss) per share—basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.11		$	0.04
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		(0.01	)
Net income	$	0.10		$	0.03
Net income (loss) per share—diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.11		$	0.04
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		(0.01	)
Net income	$	0.10		$	0.03
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents:
Basic		4850,~~466~~229			4748,~~856~~048
Diluted		5253,~~203~~916			4748,~~856~~529
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

C-COR Incorporated

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007			March 24, 2006
	September 28, 2007			September 29,2006
Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)	$	14,807		$	(38,487	)
Net income	$	4,990		$	1,583
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		61,~~579~~652			82,~~638~~239
Stock-based compensation		2,~~595~~811			21,~~845~~056
Impairment charges		—			7,122
Loss on sale of product line		—			245
Loss (gain) on sale of product line		245			(1,970	)
Deferred income tax		643			666
Other, net		~~123~~62			~~450~~15
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition and divestitures:
Receivables		(721,~~878~~754	)		~~362~~(3,144	)
Inventories		~~(10~~4,~~540~~336	)		~~15,298~~(248	)
Accounts payable		1(2,~~904~~233	)		(131,~~872~~107	)
Accrued liabilities and deferred revenue		19(12,~~020~~130	)		26,~~918~~142
Deferred income tax		990			1,818
Other		(9	)		(2,441	)
Other		(3,447	)		982
Net cash provided by operating activities		21,876			5,006
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		24,398			(13,896	)
Investing Activities:
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment		(41,~~467~~645	)		(41,~~552~~698	)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment		30			183
Proceeds from sale and maturities of marketable securities and other investments		24,535			3,560
Proceeds from sale and maturities of marketable securities and other investments		21,378			16,362
Purchase of marketable securities and other investments		(42,126	)		(4,574	)
Purchase of marketable securities and other investments		(51,611	)		(12,395	)
Proceeds from the sale of product line		—			388
Proceeds from the sale of product line		388			3,348
Net cash used in investing activities		(19,236	)		(2,324	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(26	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(34,282	)		2,920
Financing Activities:
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations		(~~283~~92	)		(~~146~~77	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employee stock purchase plan		59			103
Proceeds from financing arrangements		—			447
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock warrants		9,561			670
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employee stock purchase plan		28			16
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(43	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock warrants		3,005			784
Net cash provided by financing activities		92,~~337~~941			~~584~~1,170
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		~~336~~474			~~(179~~160	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(211	)		(10,571	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		6,055			4,012
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		4454,~~658~~913			3644,~~898~~658
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	4460,~~447~~968		$	2648,~~327~~670
Supplemental cash flow information:
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Fair value adjustment of available-for-sale securities	$	1131		$	~~(13~~22	)
Capital lease obligation		—			258
Purchase of assets under equipment financing agreements		471			—
Equity securities received in connection with Adelphia Communications Corporation Bankruptcy		139			—

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

C-COR Incorporated

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, in the opinion of management of C-COR Incorporated (the Company), contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments except as noted) necessary to fairly present the Company’s consolidated financial position as of ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 and the consolidated results of operations for ~~the~~ ~~thirteen~~the ~~week and thirty~~thirteen-~~nine~~ week periods ended ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 and ~~March~~September 2429, 2006. Operating results for the thirteen ~~week and thirty~~-~~nine~~ week ~~periods~~period ended ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the ~~fiscal~~ year ending June 2927, ~~2007~~2008 due to the cyclical nature of the industry in which the Company operates, timing of recognizing revenues from the sale of certain content and operations management systems, fluctuations in currencies related to intercompany foreign currency transactions where settlement is anticipated, and changes in overall conditions that could affect the carrying value of the Company’s assets and liabilities. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3029, ~~2006~~2007 (fiscal year ~~2006~~2007).

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company sold certain assets and liabilities related to the Company’s field services business which was a component of its Network Services business segment. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 (Statement 144) “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the field services operations were classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

On September 23, 2007, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with ARRIS Group, Inc. (“ARRIS”), pursuant to which the Company will merge with a subsidiary of ARRIS and become a wholly owned subsidiary of ARRIS (see Note 4).

2. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Company is a global provider of integrated, end-to-end network solutions that include ~~access and transport~~ products, content and operations management systems, and ~~technical~~professional services for two-way hybrid fiber coax broadband networks delivering video, voice, and data. The Company operates in ~~two~~one industry ~~segments:~~segment ~~Broadband~~and ~~Systems~~is ~~Solutions~~responsible for the development, management, production, deployment, support and ~~Network~~sale ~~Services~~of unified solutions for delivering voice, video and data services over complex networks for residential and business subscribers. The Company’s product categories are as follows:

~~The~~• ~~Broadband~~Access ~~Systems~~products ~~Solutions~~and ~~segment~~services, isincludes ~~responsible~~network ~~for~~infrastructure products, including the ~~development,~~Company’s ~~management,~~amplitude ~~production,~~modulation ~~deployment,~~headend/hub ~~support~~optical platform and ~~sale~~line of ~~unified~~optical ~~solutions~~nodes, and a full offering of radio frequency amplifiers, as well as professional services for ~~delivering~~ ~~voice~~engineering, ~~video~~design, and ~~data~~deployment ~~services~~of advanced applications over ~~complex~~broadband networks, ~~for~~including ~~residential~~network ~~and~~design, ~~business~~network ~~subscribers~~integration, ~~including:~~and consulting to a variety of customers.

• ~~Network~~Content ~~infrastructure~~and ~~products~~operations management systems, ~~including~~includes ~~the~~software, ~~Company’s~~hardware, ~~amplitude~~and ~~modulation~~support ~~headend/hub~~for ~~optical~~the ~~platform~~delivery of video on demand and ~~line~~digital ofadvertising ~~optical~~as ~~nodes~~well as application-oriented, ~~and~~operational asupport ~~full~~software ~~offering~~for ofmanaging ~~radio~~bandwidth ~~frequency~~and ~~amplifiers~~resource utilization, network and service assurance, and mobile workforce automation.

• Content and operations management systems, including software and hardware, for delivery of video on demand and digital advertising as well as application-oriented, operational support software for managing bandwidth and resource utilization, network and service assurance, and mobile workforce automation.

The Network Services segment provides outsourced technical services for engineering, design, and deployment of advanced applications over broadband networks, including installation services, network design and engineering, network integration, outside plant and construction services, and consulting to a variety of customers.

For additional information regarding the Company’s reporting segments, see Note 15.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management has discussed the development and selection of the Company’s critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the Company’s related disclosures. A detailed description of the Company’s significant accounting policies is set forth in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ~~2006~~2007, and is supplemented by the information below.

Reclassifications and Revisions

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year consolidated financial statement presentation.

The June 30, 2006 consolidated condensed balance sheet has been revised to reflect a reclassification of $8,621 from cash and cash equivalents to marketable securities due to certain securities having an original maturity greater than three months. This revision affected the consolidated statement of cash flows for the thirty-nine week period ended March 24, 2006. This revision did not affect the consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.

~~The~~On ~~impact~~June 30, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of ~~this~~FASB ~~reclassification~~Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 provides recognition criteria and ~~revision~~a onrelated ~~the~~measurement model for tax positions taken by companies. In accordance with FIN 48, a tax position is a position in a previously ~~issued~~filed ~~consolidated~~tax ~~condensed~~return ~~balance~~or ~~sheet~~a position expected to be taken in a future tax filing that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Tax positions are recognized only when it is more likely than ~~statement~~not (likelihood of ~~cash~~greater ~~flows~~than ~~was~~50%), based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are measured using a probability weighted approach as ~~follows:~~the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement (see Note 13).

	As reported			Adjustment			Adjusted Balance
Balance sheet as of June 30, 2006:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	53,279		$	(8,621	)	$	44,658
Marketable securities		7,649			8,621			16,270
Statement of cash flows for the thirty-nine week period ended March 24, 2006:
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(13,896	)	$	—		$	(13,896	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,585			1,335			2,920
Net cash provided by financing activities		584			—			584
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(179	)		—			(179	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(11,906	)	$	1,335		$	(10,571	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		43,320			(6,422	)		36,898
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	31,414		$	(5,087	)	$	26,327

Reclassifications and Revisions

~~Revenue~~Certain ~~Recognition~~prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year consolidated financial statement presentation.

The ~~Company~~June 30, ~~recognizes~~2006 ~~revenue~~consolidated ~~when~~balance ~~persuasive~~sheet ~~evidence~~was ofpreviously anrevised ~~arrangement~~to ~~exists~~reflect a reclassification of $8,621 ~~delivery~~from ~~has~~cash ~~occurred~~and orcash ~~services~~equivalents ~~have~~to ~~been~~marketable ~~rendered,~~securities due to certain securities having an original maturity greater than three months. This revision affected the ~~sale~~condensed ~~price~~consolidated isstatement ~~fixed~~of orcash ~~determinable~~flows for the thirteen-week period ending September 29, ~~and~~2006. ~~collectibility~~This isrevision ~~reasonably~~did ~~assured~~not affect the consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.

~~Products~~The impact of reclassifications and revisions on the previously issued condensed consolidated statements of cash flows was as follows:

Revenue from product sales and sales-type leases is recognized based upon delivery terms. Revenue is recognized when the equipment has been shipped to the customer when delivery terms are origin-based (e.g., FOB Shipping Point and Ex-works). When delivery terms are destination-based (e.g., FOB Destination, Delivery duty unpaid (DDU) and Delivery duty paid (DDP)), revenue is recognized upon the delivery of the equipment. In instances in which payments are received upon product delivery and the agreement with the customer contains a customer acceptance clause, revenue recognition is deferred until customer acceptance is obtained. Deferred revenue recorded under these arrangements was $23 and $78 at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively.


	As reported			Adjustment			Adjusted Balance
Statement of cash flows for the thirteen-week period ended September 29, 2006:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	5,080		$	(74	)	$	5,006
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,402	)		(922	)		(2,324	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		723			447			1,170
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		160			—			160

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	4,561		$	(549	)	$	4,012
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		53,279			(8,621	)		44,658

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	57,840		$	(9,170	)	$	48,670

Content and Operations Management Systems:

Content and operations management systems revenue consists of equipment and application software sales of video on demand systems, digital advertising insertion systems and operational support systems. Software and associated system product revenues are recognized based on the guidance of AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” (SOP 97-2), as amended. In multiple element arrangements, the Company allocates revenue to the various elements based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value. The Company’s VSOE of fair value is determined based on the price charged when the same element is sold separately. If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, revenue recognition is deferred until all elements without VSOE are delivered, at which time the Company applies the residual method. Under the residual method, if VSOE exists for the undelivered element (post contract support (PCS)), the fair value of the undelivered element is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the PCS contract, and the remaining portion of the arrangement is recognized as revenue upon delivery, which generally occurs on completion of implementation of the system.

For software license arrangements where professional services are being provided and are deemed to be essential to the functionality or are for significant production, modification, or customization of the software product, both the software and the associated professional service revenue are recognized in accordance with the provisions of ARB 45 and SOP 81-1. Many of these software and professional services arrangements are recognized using the completed-contract method as the Company does not have the ability to reasonably estimate contract costs at the inception of the contracts. Under the completed-contract method, revenue is recognized when the contract is complete, and all direct costs and related revenues are deferred until that time. The Company recognizes software license and associated professional services revenue for one of its software license products (mobile workforce management) using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting as the Company believes that its estimates of costs to complete and extent of progress toward completion of such contracts are reliable. The entire amount of an estimated loss on a contract is accrued at the time a loss on a contract is projected. Actual losses may differ from these estimates.

Software maintenance and support services fees are generally billed and collected in advance of the associated maintenance contract term. Maintenance and support services fees collected are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized ratably under the straight-line method over the term of the contract. Unbilled receivables totaled $127 and $534 at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively.

Deferred revenue represents amounts billed and totaled $34,433 and $22,301 at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Contract costs related to deferred revenue consist primarily of direct labor and applicable benefits, travel and other direct costs, and equipment costs. Deferred costs under these contracts were $7,702 and $4,555 as of March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively.

Services:

Service revenues, consisting of system design, field services, and consulting engagements, are recognized as services are rendered in accordance with the terms of contracts. At times, the Company enters into multiple element contracts that entail delivery of both products and services. These contracts are accounted for under the percentage of completion method in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 45, “Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts” (ARB No. 45) using the relevant guidance in AICPA Statement of Position 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts” (SOP 81-1). Under the percentage of completion method, for certain contracts the Company records revenue by reference to the costs incurred to date and the estimated costs remaining to fulfill the contracts. For other contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion method, revenue and costs are recognized on the units of delivery method. This method recognizes as revenue the contract price of units of the product delivered during each period and the costs allocable to the delivered units as the related cost of sales. Provisions for losses on service contracts are recognized in the period in which the loss first becomes apparent. For contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion method, the Company typically performs the service prior to billing the customer which gives rise to unbilled receivables. In these circumstances, billings usually occur shortly after the Company performs specific increments of work, as outlined in the contract. Unbilled receivables are expected to be billed and collected generally within three to six months. Unbilled receivables totaled $2,781 and $2,774 at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Deferred costs under units of delivery contracts were $146 and $0 at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively.

Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 establishes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for income tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 also prescribes a two-step evaluation process for tax positions. The first step is recognition and the second is measurement. For recognition, an enterprise judgmentally determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. If the tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, it is measured and recognized in the financial statements as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. If a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, no benefit is recognized in the financial statements.

Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date of FIN 48 may be recognized or, continue to be recognized, upon adoption of FIN 48. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 is required to be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the fiscal year in which FIN 48 is adopted. FIN 48 will apply to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact FIN 48 will have on its consolidated financial statements when it becomes effective for the Company in its fiscal year 2008 and is unable, at this time, to quantify the impact, if any, on the Company’s retained earnings at the time of adoption.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The Company is currently assessing SFAS No. 157 and has not yet determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its results of operations and financial position when it becomes effective for the Company in fiscal year 2009.

In ~~September 2006~~February 2007, the ~~Securities~~FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and ~~Exchange~~Financial ~~Commission~~Liabilities” (~~SEC~~“SFAS 159”). ~~released~~SFAS ~~SEC~~159 ~~Staff~~permits ~~Accounting~~entities ~~Bulletin~~to Nochoose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. ~~108,~~ ~~“Considering~~The ~~the~~objective ~~Effects~~is ofto ~~Prior~~improve ~~Year~~financial ~~Misstatements~~reporting ~~when~~by ~~Quantifying~~providing ~~Misstatements~~entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in ~~Current~~reported ~~Year~~earnings ~~Financial~~caused ~~Statements,”~~by ~~(“SAB~~measuring ~~108”),~~related ~~which~~assets ~~addresses~~and ~~how~~liabilities ~~uncorrected~~differently ~~errors~~without inhaving ~~previous~~to ~~years~~apply ~~should~~complex behedge ~~considered~~accounting ~~when~~provisions. ~~quantifying~~SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing SFAS 159 and has not yet determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its results of operations and financial position.

4. PLAN OF MERGER

On September 23, 2007, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) with ARRIS Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ARRIS”), and Air Merger Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of ARRIS (“Merger Sub”), whereby the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). Each issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock will be converted into the right to receive either $13.75 in cash or 0.9642 share of ARRIS common stock, subject to adjustment based on the average closing price of ARRIS’ common stock prior to the closing of the Merger. Shareholders may elect to receive cash, ARRIS common stock or a combination of cash and ARRIS common stock in exchange for their shares of C-COR stock. The actual aggregate consideration received by shareholders of the Company will be 51% cash and 49% ARRIS common stock and C-COR shareholder elections will be pro-rated if necessary. In addition, all outstanding options to acquire C-COR common stock, the vesting of which will accelerate as a result of the Merger, will be converted into the right to acquire shares of ARRIS common stock.

The stock component of the merger consideration is subject to adjustment in the event that the average closing price of ARRIS’ common stock for the ten trading-day period ending three trading days prior to the closing date of the Merger (the “Average Closing Price”) is less than $12.83 or more than $15.69, provided, however, that no further adjustments will be made in the event the Average Closing Price is less than $11.41 or more than $17.11. The adjustments to the merger consideration can be made, at ARRIS’ option and subject to certain restrictions, in cash, shares of ARRIS common stock, or a combination of both.

ARRIS and C-COR have each made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Agreement, including, among others, covenants to conduct their businesses in the ordinary course between the execution of the Agreement and the consummation of the Merger. ARRIS also has agreed to name one nominee of C-COR to the ARRIS board of directors as soon as practicable after the Merger is complete. The Merger is subject to the approval of the shareholders of both ARRIS and C-COR, as well as the receipt of regulatory approvals, including clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. On October 29, 2007, the Company announced that it has received early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott Rodino Act. The Company has set November 7, 2007 as the record date and December 14, 2007 as the meeting date for the special meeting of its shareholders to approve the merger.

In addition to the customary termination provisions, the Agreement provides that either ARRIS or C-COR may terminate the Agreement in the event that the Average Closing Price is less than $11.41. Upon the termination of the Agreement under specified circumstances, ARRIS or C-COR, as the case may be, would be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $22,500. No termination fee would be payable by either party in the event that either party exercises their rights to terminate in the event that the Average Closing Price is less than $11.41.

5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company sold certain assets and liabilities of its field services operations, the operations of which were included as a component of the Company’s Network Services segment, to Source Broadband Solutions, LLC, a privately held business in Atlanta, Georgia. During the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, the Company incurred a loss from discontinued operations of $536 primarily related to customer claims, restructuring costs, and certain employee costs during the period.

6. RESTRUCTURING COSTS

For the thirteen-week periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, restructuring costs by category for continuing operations were as follows:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	September 28, 2007		September 29, 2006
Employee severance and relocation benefits	$	38	$	104
Contractual obligations		167		296

Total restructuring costs	$	205	$	400

~~errors~~For ~~in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 requires registrants to consider~~ the ~~effect of all carry over and reversing effects of prior~~thirteen-~~year misstatements~~week ~~when~~period ~~quantifying~~ended ~~errors~~September 28, in2007, ~~current-year financial statements. SAB 108 does not change~~ the ~~SEC~~Company ~~staff’s~~recorded ~~previous~~$205 ~~guidance on evaluating the materiality~~ of ~~errors.~~restructuring ~~SAB~~charges ~~108 allows registrants to record the effects of adopting SAB 108~~in ~~guidance~~continuing ~~as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. This adjustment must be reported in the annual financial statements of the first fiscal year ending after November 15~~operations, ~~2006.~~representing ~~The~~employee ~~Company~~severance isbenefits ~~currently evaluating the impact SAB 108 will have on its consolidated financial statements when it becomes effective for the Company as of June 29, 2007~~ and iscontractual ~~unable~~obligations, atincluding ~~this~~leased ~~time,~~facility ~~to quantify the impact, if any, on the Company’s result of operations, financial position~~ and ~~retained~~ ~~earnings~~equipment ~~at the time of adoption~~costs.

~~In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “~~The ~~Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and~~following ~~Financial~~table ~~Liabilities”~~provides ~~(“SFAS~~detail ~~159”).~~on ~~SFAS~~the ~~159~~activity ~~permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments~~ and ~~certain~~remaining ~~other~~restructuring ~~items~~accrual atbalance ~~fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting~~ by ~~providing~~category ~~entities~~as ~~with~~of the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after NovemberSeptember 1528, 2007.: ~~The Company is currently assessing SFAS 159 and has not yet determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its results of operations and financial position.~~

In June 2006, the FASB ratified EITF No. 06-3, “Disclosure Requirements for Taxes Assessed by a Government Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions.” EITF 06-3 requires disclosure of a company’s accounting policy with respect to presentation of taxes collected on a revenue producing transaction between a seller and a customer. For taxes that are reported on a gross basis (included in revenue and costs), EITF 06-3 also requires disclosure of the amount of taxes included in the financial statements. The Company records taxes on a net basis. EITF 06-3 was effective for the Company beginning December 30, 2006 and it did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


	Restructuring Accrual at June 29, 2007		Continuing Operations Charges in Fiscal Year 2008		Discontinued Operations Charges in Fiscal Year 2008		Net Cash Paid			Restructuring Accrual at September 28, 2007
Employee severance and termination benefits	$	210	$	38	$	—	$	(220	)	$	28
Contractual obligations and other		958		167		12		(416	)		721

Total	$	1,168	$	205	$	12	$	(636	)	$	749

4.Amounts ~~RESTRUCTURING~~accrued ~~COSTS~~as of September 28, 2007 for employee severance and termination benefits will be paid out during the second quarter of fiscal year 2008.

~~During~~Amounts ~~the~~related ~~thirteen~~to ~~week~~contractual ~~and~~obligations ~~thirty-nine~~relate ~~week~~to ~~periods~~excess ~~ended~~leased ~~March 30,~~facilities ~~2007~~ and ~~March 24~~equipment, ~~2006,~~which ~~the~~will ~~Company~~be ~~incurred~~paid over ~~restructuring~~their ~~costs~~remaining tolease ~~align~~terms ~~its~~through ~~workforce~~2014, ~~facilities~~ ~~and~~unless ~~operating~~terminated ~~costs with current business opportunities~~earlier. ~~For the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006, restructuring costs by category were as follows:~~

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007		March 24, 2006
Employee severance and relocation benefits	$	220	$	3,246
Contractual obligations		650		41
Total restructuring costs	$	870	$	3,287
	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007		March 24, 2006
Employee severance and relocation benefits	$	387	$	4,497
Contractual obligations		1,344		540
Total restructuring costs	$	1,731	$	5,037

7. INVENTORIES

~~For~~Inventories ~~the~~as ~~thirteen~~of ~~week period ended March~~September 3028, 2007, ~~the Company recorded $870 of restructuring charges, representing contractual obligations, including leased facility~~ and equipment costs, employee severance and termination benefits associated with workforce reductions of nine employees, and relocation benefits. Restructuring charges associated with our Broadband Systems Solutions operating segment for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended MarchJune 3029, 2007 ~~were~~consisted ~~$180 and $780, respectively, compared to $3,287 and $5,037 for the same periods~~ of the ~~prior~~following: ~~year. Restructuring charges associated with our Network Services operating segment for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 were $690 and $951, respectively.~~


	September 28, 2007		June 29, 2007
Finished goods	$	4,569	$	7,646
Work-in-process		2,180		3,136
Raw materials		17,068		17,368

Total inventories	$	23,817	$	28,150

~~The~~8. ~~following~~GOODWILL ~~table~~AND ~~provides~~OTHER ~~detail~~INTANGIBLE onASSETS ~~the activity and remaining restructuring accrual balance by category as of March 30, 2007:~~

	Restructuring Accrual at June 30, 2006		RestructuringCharges in Fiscal Year 2007		Net Cash Paid			Restructuring Accrual at March 30, 2007
Employee severance and relocation benefits	$	1,626	$	387	$	(1,866	)	$	147
Contractual obligations		925		1,344		(842	)		1,427
Total	$	2,551	$	1,731	$	(2,708	)	$	1,574

As of September 28, 2007 and June 29, 2007, goodwill was $128,610 and $128,825, respectively. During the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, goodwill decreased $215, which consisted of a decrease of $234 related to utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, resulting in a reversal of valuation allowances associated with acquisitions, and an increase of $19 related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates used to translate the goodwill related to foreign subsidiaries at the balance sheet date.

~~Amounts~~Other ~~accrued~~intangible assets as of ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 ~~for employee severance~~ and ~~termination benefits will be paid out over~~June 29, ~~bi-weekly~~2007 ~~periods~~consisted ~~through~~of the ~~first~~following: quarter of fiscal year 2008. Amounts related to contractual obligations relate to excess leased facilities and equipment, which will be paid over their remaining lease terms through 2014, unless terminated earlier.

5. INVENTORIES


	September 28, 2007			June 29, 2007
Cost of intangibles:
Purchased technology	$	13,412		$	13,412
Customer relationships		5,010			5,010
Covenants not-to-compete		860			860
Patents and trademarks		1,200			1,200

Total cost of intangibles		20,482			20,482

Less accumulated amortization:
Purchased technology		(12,402	)		(11,908	)
Customer relationships		(4,804	)		(4,665	)
Covenants not-to-compete		(860	)		(860	)
Patents and trademarks		(1,200	)		(1,200	)

Total accumulated amortization		(19,266	)		(18,633	)

Total other intangible assets, net	$	1,216		$	1,849

~~Inventories~~9. asLETTER ofOF ~~March 30, 2007~~CREDIT ~~and~~AGREEMENT ~~June 30, 2006 consisted of the following:~~

	March 30, 2007		June 30, 2006
Finished goods	$	8,362	$	7,026
Work-in-process		3,625		1,808
Raw materials		24,022		16,603
Total inventories	$	36,009	$	25,437

Effective November 1, 2007, the Company amended its credit agreement of November 5, 2004 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with a bank for a $10,000 revolving letter of credit facility. Under the Credit Agreement, the $10,000 may be used solely for the issuance of letters of credit which must be fully cash collateralized at the time of issuance. The Company is required to maintain with the bank cash collateral of 102% of the amount that can be drawn on the issued letters of credit. This collateral can be drawn on upon the occurrence of any event of default under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement contains standard event of default provisions, but no financial covenants. The Credit Agreement is committed through October 31, 2008. The applicable margin under the Credit Agreement is 0.65%, payable quarterly in arrears. In the event that a letter of credit is drawn upon, the interest rate for any unreimbursed drawing is the bank’s floating prime rate.

6As of September 28, 2007, the aggregate amount of letters of credit issued under the Agreement was $3,608. ~~GOODWILL~~A ~~AND~~cash compensating ~~OTHER~~balance ~~INTANGIBLE~~of ~~ASSETS~~$4,296 (includes interest earned on account) was funded as of September 28, 2007 to secure the Company’s reimbursement obligation relating to the letters of credit (see Note 14).

Goodwill was $131,034 and $131,209 as of March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. As of March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, goodwill was allocated by segment as follows:

	March 30, 2007		June 30, 2006
Business segment:
Broadband Systems Solutions	$	124,057	$	124,232
Network Services		6,977		6,977
Total	$	131,034	$	131,209

During the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007, goodwill decreased $175, which consisted of a decrease of $342 related to the divestiture of certain operations in Bangalore, India, a decrease of $61 related primarily to settlement of certain income tax contingencies, resulting in a reversal of a valuation allowance associated with the acquisition of nCUBE Corporation, and an increase of $228 related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates used to translate the goodwill related to foreign subsidiaries at the balance sheet date.

Under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill is no longer amortized. Rather, goodwill is subject to a periodic impairment test based on its fair value. The Company has selected the end of its third fiscal quarter of each year to reassess the value of its reporting units and related goodwill balance, or at other times if events have occurred or circumstances exist that indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company obtained an independent appraisal as of March 30, 2007 to assess the fair value of its reporting units, to determine whether goodwill carried on its books was impaired and the extent of such impairment, if any. The independent appraisal used the income and market approach to measure the fair value of the Company’s business units. Management’s assumptions regarding estimates of operating results and expected cash flows for each business unit were provided to the independent appraiser, along with historical operating performance. Under the income approach, fair value is dependent on the present value of future economic benefits to be derived from ownership. Future net cash flows available for distribution are discounted at market-based rates

~~of return to provide indications of the value~~10. ~~Based~~ACCRUED ~~upon~~LIABILITIES ~~this independent appraisal, the Company determined that its current goodwill balances were not impaired as of March 30, 2007.~~

~~Other~~Accrued ~~intangible~~liabilities ~~assets~~ as of ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 and June 3029, ~~2006~~2007 consisted of the following:

	March 30,2007				June 30, 2006
	September 28,2007			June 29,2007
Cost of intangibles:
Accrued vacation expense	$	4,100		$	4,169
Purchased technology	$	13,412			$	13,412
Accrued salary expense		2,793			2,362
Customer relationships		5,010				5,010
Accrued incentive compensation expense		1,283			5,607
Covenants not-to-compete		860				860
Accrued employee benefit expense		569			932
Patents and trademarks		1,200				1,200
Accrued sales tax expense		964			701
Total cost of intangibles		20,482				20,482
Accrued warranty expense		5,603			5,500
Less accumulated amortization:
Accrued workers’ compensation expense		598			663
Purchased technology		(11,271	)			(9,291	)
Accrued restructuring costs		749			1,168
Customer relationships		(4,503	)			(3,996	)
Accrued income taxes payable		237			915
Covenants not-to-compete		(860	)			(860	)
Accrued other		6,753			9,274
Patents and trademarks		(1,200	)			(1,200	)
	$	23,649		$	31,291
Total accumulated amortization		(17,834	)			(15,347	)
Total other intangible assets, net	$	2,648			$	5,135

711. ~~LONG-TERM~~INCOME ~~DEBT~~PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

~~During~~Basic ~~the~~income ~~thirty-nine~~per ~~week~~share ~~period~~from ~~ended~~continuing ~~March 30,~~operations ~~2007,~~is computed by dividing income from continuing operations by the ~~Company~~weighted ~~obtained~~average ~~$447~~number of ~~additional~~common ~~financing~~shares ~~through~~outstanding. aDiluted ~~financing~~income ~~company~~from ~~for~~continuing operations per share is computed by dividing income from continuing operations by the ~~purchase~~weighted average number of ~~machinery~~common shares outstanding and ~~equipment~~potential common shares outstanding. ~~The~~Potential ~~borrowings~~common ~~have~~shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants having a ~~weighted~~dilutive effect calculated under the treasury stock method using the average ~~interest~~market ~~rate~~price for the period and from the potential conversion of 9 the Company’s 3.355% senior unsecured convertible notes, calculated under the if-converted method. ~~Monthly~~In ~~payments~~addition, ofin ~~principal~~computing ~~and~~the ~~interest~~dilutive effect of $9the ~~are~~convertible ~~required~~notes, ~~through~~the ~~fiscal~~income ~~year~~from ~~2012.~~continuing ~~The~~operations ~~borrowings~~is ~~under~~adjusted to add back the ~~financing~~after-tax ~~agreement~~amount ~~are~~of ~~collateralized~~interest byand amortized debt issuance costs recognized in the period ~~equipment~~associated with the senior unsecured convertible notes. ~~The~~Any ~~principal~~potential ~~balance~~shares atthat ~~March 30,~~are ~~2007~~antidilutive ~~was~~are ~~$405~~excluded from the effect of dilutive securities.

8.Income ~~LETTER~~per OFshare ~~CREDIT~~from ~~AGREEMENT~~continuing operations is calculated as follows:

Effective November 1, 2006, the Company amended its credit agreement of November 5, 2004 (as amended, the “Agreement”) with a bank for a $10,000 revolving letter of credit facility. Under the Agreement, the $10,000 may be used solely for the issuance of letters of credit which must be fully cash collateralized at the time of issuance. The Company is required to maintain with the bank cash collateral of 102% of the amount that can be drawn on the issued letters of credit. This collateral can be drawn on upon the occurrence of any event of default under the Agreement. The Agreement contains standard event of default provisions, but no financial covenants. The Agreement is committed through November 3, 2007. The applicable margin under the Agreement is 0.65%, payable quarterly in arrears. In the event that a letter of credit is drawn upon, the interest rate for any unreimbursed drawing is the bank’s floating prime rate.


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	September 28, 2007		September 29, 2006
Basic income per share from continuing operations:
Income from continuing operations	$	5,526	$	2,174

Weighted average common shares outstanding		50,229,304		48,047,973
Basic income per share from continuing operations	$	0.11	$	0.04
Diluted income from continuing operations per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	5,526	$	2,174
Interest and expense related to 3.5% senior unsecured convertible debt		306		—

Income for purposes of computing diluted income per share from continuing operations	$	5,832	$	2,174

Weighted average common shares outstanding		50,229,304		48,047,973
Plus effect of:
Stock options and warrants		848,229		480,721
3.5% senior unsecured convertible debt		2,838,168		—

Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents		53,915,701		48,528,694

Diluted income per share from continuing operations:	$	0.11	$	0.04

As of March 30, 2007, the aggregate amount of letters of credit issued under the Agreement was $4,049. A cash compensating balance of $4,187 (includes interest earned on account) was funded as of March 30, 2007 to secure the Company’s reimbursement obligation relating to the letters of credit (see Note 13).

9.For ~~ACCRUED~~the ~~LIABILITIES~~thirteen-week periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, total potential common shares of 3,841,197 and 6,143,852, respectively, were excluded from the diluted income per share from continuing operations calculation because they were antidilutive.

~~Accrued~~12. ~~liabilities~~COMPREHENSIVE asINCOME ~~of March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 consisted of the following:~~

	March 30, 2007		June 30, 2006
Accrued vacation expense	$	3,922	$	3,541
Accrued salary expense		3,672		2,170
Accrued incentive compensation expense		6,366		—
Accrued employee benefit expense		266		1,106
Accrued sales tax expense		577		220
Accrued warranty expense		5,766		5,319
Accrued workers’ compensation expense		577		760
Accrued restructuring costs		1,574		2,551
Accrued income taxes payable		966		876
Accrued other		8,804		9,880
	$	32,490	$	26,423

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, if applicable, are as follows:

10. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE


	September 28, 2007		June 29, 2007
Unrealized gain on marketable securities	$	41	$	10
Foreign currency translation gain		7,165		6,390

Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	7,206	$	6,400

~~Basic~~The ~~net~~components ~~income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number~~ of ~~common~~comprehensive ~~shares outstanding. Diluted net~~ income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potential common shares outstanding. Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants having a dilutive effect, calculated under the treasury stock method using the average market price for the ~~period, and from the potential conversion of the Company’s 3.5% senior convertible notes, calculated under the if~~thirteen-~~converted~~week ~~method.~~periods Inended ~~addition~~September 28, in2007 ~~computing the dilutive effect of~~and ~~the convertible debt~~September 29, ~~the~~2006 ~~net income (loss) is adjusted to add back the after-tax amount of interest and amortized debt issuance costs recognized in the period associated with the convertible debt. Any potential shares that~~ are ~~antidilutive~~as ~~are excluded~~follows: ~~from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share.~~

Net income (loss) per share is calculated as follows:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	September 28, 2007		September 29, 2006
Net income	$	4,990	$	1,583
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		31		22
Foreign currency translation gain		775		296

Other comprehensive income		806		318

Comprehensive income	$	5,796	$	1,901

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007		March 24, 2006
Basic net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	7,361	$	(7,948	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		49,079,596		47,895,832
Basic net income (loss) per share	$	0.15	$	(0.17	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	7,361	$	(7,948	)
Interest and expense related to 3.5% senior unsecured convertible debt		306		—
Income (loss) for purposes of computing diluted net income (loss) per share	$	7,667	$	(7,948	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		49,079,596		47,895,832
Plus effect of:
Stock options and warrants		1,273,389		—
3.5% senior unsecured convertible debt		2,838,169		—
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents		53,191,154		47,895,832
Diluted net income (loss) per share:	$	0.14	$	(0.17	)

The Company accounts for certain intercompany loans that are denominated in foreign currencies as being permanent in nature, as settlement is not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future. As such, foreign currency translation gains and losses related to these loans are excluded from net income and reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

~~For~~13. ~~the~~INCOME ~~thirteen~~TAXES week periods ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006, total potential common shares of 750,041 and 8,831,454, respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation because they were antidilutive.

The Company determines income taxes for each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This determination involves estimating the Company’s actual current income tax payable and assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as reserves and accruals, for tax and accounting purposes. Deferred taxes arise due to temporary differences in the bases of assets and liabilities and from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. In general, deferred tax assets represent future tax benefits to be received when certain expenses previously recognized in the Company’s statement of operations become deductible expenses under applicable income tax laws or net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards are utilized. Accordingly, realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future taxable income against which these deductions, net operating losses and tax credits can be utilized. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Historical operating losses, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies are considered in making this assessment.

As a result of cumulative losses the Company incurred in prior years, management previously recorded a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. The Company expects to maintain the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets until it can sustain a level of profitability in the applicable tax jurisdictions that demonstrates its ability to utilize these assets. As of September 28, 2007, a valuation allowance on substantially all of the deferred tax assets remains, except in certain foreign jurisdictions where the Company has been consistently profitable.

Income tax expense for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007 arose primarily from the following: recognition of additional valuation allowance, current taxes paid or payable for state and foreign income tax in those jurisdictions where offsetting loss carryforwards are not available or are limited, and from a decrease in valuation allowance due to the utilization of acquired net operating loss carryforwards for which the tax benefit is recorded as a decrease in goodwill.

	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007		March 24,2006
Basic net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	14,807	$	(38,487	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		48,465,640		47,855,679
Basic net income (loss) per share	$	0.31	$	(0.80	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	14,807	$	(38,487	)
Interest and expense related to 3.5% senior unsecured convertible debt		919		—
Income (loss) for purposes of computing diluted net income (loss) per share	$	15,726	$	(38,487	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		48,465,640		47,855,679
Plus effect of:
Stock options and warrants		899,463		—
3.5% senior unsecured convertible debt		2,838,169		—
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents		52,203,272		47,855,679
Diluted net income (loss) per share:	$	0.30	$	(0.80	)

Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

~~For~~On June 30, 2007, the ~~thirty-nine~~Company ~~week~~adopted ~~periods~~the ~~ended~~provisions ~~March 30,~~of ~~2007~~FASB ~~and~~Interpretation ~~March~~No. 2448, ~~2006~~Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, ~~total~~an ~~potential~~Interpretation ~~common~~of ~~shares~~FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 ofprovides ~~1,791,549~~recognition criteria and ~~8,983,032,~~a ~~respectively~~related measurement model for tax positions taken by companies. In accordance with FIN 48, ~~were~~a ~~excluded~~tax ~~from~~position ~~the~~is ~~diluted~~a ~~net~~position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax filing that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Tax positions are recognized only when it is more likely than not (~~loss~~likelihood of greater than 50%), ~~per~~based ~~share~~on ~~calculation~~technical ~~because~~merits, ~~they~~that ~~were~~the ~~antidilutive~~position will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are measured using a probability weighted approach as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits including interest and penalties, as of the date of adoption, was $4,242, of which $4,005 had been previously reserved under FASB Statement 5 and FASB Statement No. 109, prior to adoption of FIN 48. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $237 increase in the liability, which was primarily related to an accrual for potential interest and penalties not previously accrued. The increase of $237 was accounted for as a reduction to retained earnings and a $159 increase to the non current tax liability, and a $78 increase was recorded as a current tax liability as it relates to anticipated audit settlements. In addition, there was a reduction of deferred tax assets and the corresponding valuation allowance of $4,005, which was reclassified to comply with FIN 48.

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2007, was $357 of tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. With regard to the unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2007, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that such unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by $614 in the next 12 months due to anticipated audit settlements, the expiration of statutes of limitations, and other events.

The Company classifies interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. The Company had $190 interest and penalties accrued at June 30, 2007. For the quarter ended September 28, 2007, there was no material change to the unrecognized tax benefits or the accrued interest and penalties.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With no material exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002.

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Letters of Credit and Bank Guarantees:

The Company has outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees which are collateralized by restricted cash. As of September 28, 2007, the commitments and restricted cash associated with outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees were as follows:


	As of September 28, 2007
	Outstanding Commitments		Restricted Cash
Letters of credit issued under Credit Agreement (see Note 9)	$	3,608	$	4,296
Other letters of credit and bank guarantees		760		769

Total	$	4,368	$	5,065

Restricted cash reflected in condensed consolidated balance sheet as:
Restricted cash (current, as terms of commitment less than 12-months)			$	4,404
Other long-term assets				661

Total			$	5,065

1115. ~~COMPREHENSIVE~~GUARANTEES ~~INCOME (LOSS)~~

As of September 28, 2007, the Company did not have any outstanding guarantees, except for product warranties. The ~~components~~Company ofwarrants ~~accumulated~~its ~~other~~products ~~comprehensive~~against ~~income~~defects in materials and workmanship, ~~net~~generally for one to five years depending upon product lines and geographic regions. A provision for estimated future costs related to warranty activities is recorded when the product is shipped, based upon historical experience of ~~tax~~product failure rates and historical costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, iffrom ~~applicable~~time to time, ~~are~~the asrecorded ~~follows:~~amount is adjusted for specifically identified warranty exposures when unforeseen technical problems arise.

	March 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
Unrealized loss on marketable securities	$	(3	)	$	(14	)
Foreign currency translation gain		6,264			5,376
Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	6,261		$	5,362

Changes in the Company’s warranty liability during the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007 is as follows:

The components of comprehensive income (loss) for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006 are as follows:


Balance as of June 29, 2007	$	5,500
Warranties issued during the period		528
Settlements made during the period		(327	)
Changes in the liability for pre-existing warranties during the period		(98	)

Balance as of September 28, 2007	$	5,603

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007			March 24,2006
Net income (loss)	$	7,361		$	(7,948	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized loss on marketable securities		(18	)		(30	)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		149			(166	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		131			(196	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	7,492		$	(8,144	)
	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007			March 24, 2006
Net income (loss)	$	14,807		$	(38,487	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities		11			(13	)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		888			(771	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		899			(784	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	15,706		$	(39,271	)

In the normal course of business, the Company is party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements, including indemnification obligations and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit (see Notes 9 and 14).

The Company licenses ~~accounts~~software ~~for~~to ~~certain~~its ~~intercompany~~customers ~~loans~~under ~~that~~written ~~are~~agreements. ~~denominated~~Each inagreement ~~foreign~~contains ~~currencies~~the asrelevant ~~being~~terms ~~permanent in~~of ~~nature,~~the ascontractual ~~settlement~~arrangement iswith ~~not~~the ~~planned~~customer, orand ~~anticipated~~generally inincludes provisions for indemnifying the ~~foreseeable~~customer ~~future.~~against Aslosses, ~~such~~expenses, ~~foreign~~and liabilities ~~currency~~from ~~translation~~damages ~~gains~~that ~~and~~may ~~losses~~be ~~related~~awarded toagainst ~~these~~the ~~loans~~customer ~~are~~in ~~excluded~~the ~~from~~event ~~net~~the ~~income~~software ~~(loss)~~is ~~and~~found ~~reported~~to asinfringe upon certain intellectual property rights of a ~~component~~third party. Each agreement generally limits the scope of ~~other~~and ~~comprehensive~~remedies for such ~~income~~indemnification ~~(loss)~~obligations in a variety of industry-standard respects. The Company has not identified any losses that are probable under these provisions and, accordingly, no liability related to these indemnification provisions has been recorded.

1216. ~~INCOME~~GAIN ~~TAXES~~ON LITIGATION JUDGMENT

~~The~~On ~~Company~~April 20, ~~determines~~2006, the ~~income~~Company ~~taxes~~received ~~for~~a ~~each~~payment of ~~the~~$8,021 ~~jurisdictions~~as ina ~~which~~settlement itresulting ~~operates.~~from ~~This~~litigation ~~determination~~against ~~involves~~SeaChange ~~estimating~~International, ~~the~~Inc. ~~Company’s~~for ~~actual~~patent ~~current~~infringement. ~~income~~The ~~tax~~award ~~payable~~included ~~and~~damages, ~~assessing~~enhanced ~~temporary~~damages, ~~differences~~interest ~~resulting~~and ~~from~~a ~~differing~~percentage ~~treatment~~ of ~~items,~~attorney ~~such~~fees. asPortions of the ~~reserves~~award ~~and~~were ~~accruals,~~subject ~~for~~to ~~tax~~contractual ~~and~~agreements ~~accounting~~with ~~purposes.~~two ~~Deferred~~third ~~taxes~~parties ~~arise~~that ~~due~~provided tofor ~~temporary~~payment ~~differences~~to ineach ~~the~~third ~~basis~~party of ~~assets~~a ~~and~~portion ~~liabilities~~of ~~and~~the ~~from~~award ~~net~~amount. ~~operating~~The ~~loss~~Company ~~and~~recorded ~~tax~~a ~~credit~~gain ~~carryforwards.~~of ~~In general~~$1,238, ~~deferred~~net ~~tax~~of ~~assets~~a ~~represent future~~recovery ~~tax~~of ~~benefits~~attorney tofees beof ~~received~~$407, ~~when~~from ~~certain~~the distribution ~~expenses~~as ~~previously~~a ~~recognized~~component of other income in ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~consolidated statement of operations ~~become~~during ~~deductible~~the ~~expenses~~fourth ~~under~~quarter ~~applicable~~of ~~income~~its ~~tax~~fiscal ~~laws~~year orended ~~net~~June 30, ~~operating~~2006. ~~loss~~An orinitial ~~tax~~distribution ~~credit~~of ~~carryforwards~~a ~~are~~portion ~~utilized. Accordingly, realization~~ of ~~deferred~~the ~~tax~~award ~~assets~~was ismade ~~dependent~~to onone ~~future~~of ~~taxable~~the ~~income~~third ~~against~~parties ~~which these deductions~~on June 30, ~~net~~2006 ~~operating~~in ~~losses~~the ~~and~~amount ~~tax~~of ~~credits can be utilized~~$3,168. InOn ~~assessing~~September 28, ~~the~~2007, ~~realizability~~a ofpayment ~~deferred~~was ~~tax~~made ~~assets,~~by the Company ~~considers whether~~to itthe isother ~~more~~third-party ~~likely~~in ~~than~~the ~~not~~amount ~~that~~of ~~some~~$3,200 ~~portion~~as orfinal ~~all~~distribution of the ~~deferred~~funds ~~tax~~received ~~assets~~in ~~will~~the ~~not~~litigation ~~be realized~~judgment. ~~Historical~~The ~~operating~~Company ~~losses,~~recorded an ~~scheduled~~additional ~~reversals~~gain of ~~deferred~~$8 ~~tax~~as ~~liabilities~~of September 28, ~~projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies are considered in making this assessment~~2007.

~~In fiscal year 2006, the Company recognized deferred tax liabilities of $200 related to unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries that may be repatriated in the foreseeable future~~17. ~~Income~~LITIGATION ~~taxes~~AND ~~are~~PENDING ~~not~~OR ~~provided~~THREATENED onLITIGATION the unremitted earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries where such earnings have been indefinitely reinvested in its foreign operations. In future periods, deferred tax liabilities for domestic income tax and foreign withholding tax will be recognized for undistributed earnings and basis differences of foreign subsidiaries when the Company no longer intends to permanently reinvest such unremitted earnings.

On July 23, 2007, the Company received correspondence from attorneys for the Adelphia Recovery Trust (“the Trust”), that the Company may have received $29,108 in transfers from Adelphia Cablevision, LLC (“Cablevision”), one of the Adelphia debtors, during the year prior to its filing of a chapter 11 petition on June 25, 2002 (the “Petition Date”). The correspondence further asserts that information obtained during the course of the Adelphia chapter 11 proceedings indicates that Cablevision was insolvent during the year prior to the Petition Date and, accordingly, the Trust intends to assert that the payments made to the Company were fraudulent transfers under section 548 (a) of the Bankruptcy Code that may be recovered for the benefit of Cablevision’s bankruptcy estate pursuant to section 550 of the Bankruptcy Code.

To date, no suit has been commenced by the Trust and the Company has requested documents supporting the Trust’s position which have not yet been provided. In the event suit is commenced, the Company intends to contest the case vigorously; however, it cannot be sure that it would be successful in its defense. The Company understands that a similar letter was received by other Adelphia suppliers and we may seek to enter into a joint defense agreement to share legal expenses if a suit is commenced. No estimate can be made of the possible range of loss, if any, associated with a resolution of these assertions, and, accordingly, the Company has not recorded a liability as of September 28, 2007. An unfavorable outcome of this matter could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations.

From time to time, the Company is a party to litigation and pending or threatened litigation that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s business, its financial position or its results of operations.

AsItem ~~a result of cumulative losses the Company incurred in prior years, management previously recorded a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets~~2. ~~The~~Management’s ~~Company~~Discussion ~~expects~~and toAnalysis ~~maintain the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets until it can sustain a level~~ of ~~profitability~~Financial inConditio ~~the~~n applicable tax jurisdictions that demonstrates its ability to utilize these assets. As of March 30, 2007, a valuation allowance on substantially all of the deferred tax assets remains, except in certain foreign jurisdictions where the Company has been consistently profitable. Income tax expense for the thirteen week and ~~thirty-nine~~Results ~~week periods ended March 30, 2007 arose primarily from the following: recognition~~ of additional valuation allowance, current taxes paid or payable for federal alternative minimum tax (“AMT”), for which any AMT credit carryforward is offset by a valuation allowance and state and foreign income tax in those jurisdictions where offsetting loss carryforwards is not available or is limited. Operations

InGeneral November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS123(R)-3, “Transition Election to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards”. This FSP requires an entity to follow either the transition guidance for the additional-paid-in-capital pool as prescribed in SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), or the alternative transition method as described in the FSP. An entity that adopts SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective application may make a one-time election to adopt the transition method described in this FSP. An entity may take up to one year from the later of its initial adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) or the effective date of this FSP to evaluate its available transition alternatives and make its one-time election. The Company has elected the alternative transition method to establish the initial pool of excess tax benefits, which would be available to absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R. The pool of excess tax benefits was determined to be zero as of the date of adoption.

13The following discussion addresses the financial condition of C-COR Incorporated (“C-COR”) as of September 28, 2007, and the results of our operations for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. ~~COMMITMENTS~~This ~~AND~~discussion ~~CONTINGENCIES~~should be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2007, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Letters~~Disclosure ofRegarding ~~Credit~~Forward-Looking ~~and~~Statements ~~Bank Guarantees:~~

~~The~~Some ~~Company~~of ~~has~~the ~~outstanding~~information ~~letters~~presented in this report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of ~~credit~~the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, among others, the possibility that the pending merger with ARRIS Group, Inc. will not be consummated, our ability to develop and ~~bank~~expand ~~guarantees~~our ~~which~~product ~~are~~offerings, ~~collateralized~~our continued investment in research and product development, fluctuations in network upgrade activity and the level of future network upgrade activity, both domestically and internationally, future capital spending in European markets being driven by ~~restricted~~upgrades made by telecommunication providers to their networks in response to increased competition for enhanced broadband services, fluctuations in the global demand for our products, content and operations management systems, and services, demand for our product line offerings in international markets, the effect of revenue levels in general, sales mix, competitive pricing, the timing of new product introductions and the timing of deployments of our content management and operational support software systems on our future overall gross margin, our expectation to maintain valuation allowances related to net tax benefits arising from temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards, our intention to continue our initiatives to achieve cost-effective operations, the adequacy of our cash and cash equivalent balances and our marketable securities to cover our operating cash requirements over the next 24 months, statements relating to our business strategy and the effect of accounting pronouncements required to be adopted by the Company. AsForward-looking statements represent our judgment regarding future events. Although we believe we have a reasonable basis for these forward-looking statements, we cannot guarantee their accuracy and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated due to a number of ~~March 30~~known and unknown uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, ~~2007~~among others, capital spending patterns of the ~~commitments~~communications industry, our ability to develop new and ~~restricted~~enhanced ~~cash~~products, ~~associated~~the ~~with~~timing ~~outstanding~~for ~~letters~~scheduled completion of certain projects and customer acceptance requirements, continued industry consolidation, the development of competing technologies, the effect of increased competition from satellite providers and telephone companies on the capital spending budgets of our cable customers, changes in the credit profiles of major customers that would lead us to restrict new orders of products and ~~bank~~services ~~guarantees~~or ~~were~~record asan ~~follows:~~increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts, timing of recognizing software revenues, changes in our sales mix, the effect of competitive pricing, an impairment of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet, the success of our initiatives to achieve cost-effective operations, our ability to convert our backlog into sales, and our ability to achieve our strategic objectives. For additional information concerning these and other important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from expectations and underlying assumptions, please refer to the reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

	As of March 30, 2007
	Outstanding Commitments		Restricted Cash
Letters of credit issued under Agreement (see Note 8)	$	4,049	$	4,187
Other letters of credit and bank guarantees		646		646
Total	$	4,695	$	4,833
Restricted cash reflected in condensed consolidated balance sheet as:
Restricted cash (current, as terms of commitment less than 12-months)			$	3,594
Other long-term assets				1,239
Total			$	4,833

Plan of Merger

On September 23, 2007, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) with ARRIS Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ARRIS”), and Air Merger Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of ARRIS (“Merger Sub”), whereby the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). Each issued and outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive either $13.75 in cash or 0.9642 share of ARRIS common stock, subject to adjustment based on the average closing price of ARRIS’ common stock prior to the closing of the Merger. Shareholders may elect to receive cash, ARRIS common stock or a combination of cash and ARRIS common stock in exchange for their shares of C-COR stock. The actual aggregate consideration received by shareholders of the Company will be 51% cash and 49% ARRIS common stock and C-COR shareholder elections will be pro-rated if necessary. In addition, all outstanding options to acquire our common stock, the vesting of which will accelerate as a result of the Merger, will be converted into the right to acquire shares of ARRIS common stock.

14ARRIS and C-COR have each made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Agreement, including, among others, covenants to conduct their businesses in the ordinary course between the execution of the Agreement and the consummation of the Merger. ~~GUARANTEES~~ARRIS also has agreed to name one nominee of C-COR to the ARRIS board of directors as soon as practicable after the Merger is complete. The Merger is subject to the approval of the shareholders of both ARRIS and C-COR, as well as the receipt of regulatory approvals, including clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. On October 29, 2007, we announced that we had received early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott Rodino Act. We have set November 7, 2007 as the record date and December 14, 2007 as the meeting date for the special meeting of its shareholders to approve the merger.

AsIn ~~of March 30,~~addition ~~2007,~~to the ~~Company~~customary ~~did~~termination ~~not~~provisions, ~~have~~the ~~any~~Agreement ~~outstanding~~provides ~~guarantees,~~that ~~except~~either ~~for~~ARRIS ~~product~~or ~~warranties.~~C-COR ~~The~~may ~~Company~~terminate ~~warrants~~the ~~its~~Agreement in ~~products~~the ~~against~~event ~~defects~~that inthe ~~materials~~Average ~~and~~Closing ~~workmanship,~~Price ~~generally~~is ~~for~~less ~~one~~than to$11.41. ~~five~~Upon ~~years~~the ~~depending~~termination ~~upon~~of ~~product~~the ~~lines~~Agreement ~~and geographic~~under ~~regions.~~specified Acircumstances, ~~provision~~ARRIS ~~for~~or ~~estimated~~C-COR, ~~future~~as ~~costs~~the ~~related~~case tomay ~~warranty~~be, ~~activities~~would isbe ~~recorded~~required ~~when~~to pay the ~~product~~other isparty ~~shipped,~~a ~~based~~termination ~~upon~~fee ~~historical~~of ~~experience~~$22.5 ofmillion. ~~product~~No termination ~~failure~~fee ~~rates~~would ~~and~~be ~~historical~~payable ~~costs~~by ~~incurred~~either party in ~~correcting~~the ~~product failures.~~event Inthat ~~addition,~~either ~~from~~party ~~time~~exercises totheir ~~time,~~rights ~~the~~to ~~recorded~~terminate ~~amount~~in isthe ~~adjusted~~event ~~for~~that ~~specifically~~the ~~identified~~Average ~~warranty~~Closing ~~exposures~~Price ~~when~~is ~~unforeseen~~less ~~technical~~than ~~problems arise~~$11.41.

~~Changes~~Business inOverview ~~the Company’s warranty liability during the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007 are as follows:~~

Balance as of June 30, 2006	$	5,319
Warranties issued during the period		2,097
Settlements made during the period		(845	)
Changes in the liability for pre-existing warranties during the period		(805	)
Balance as of March 30, 2007	$	5,766

We are a global provider of integrated, end-to-end network solutions that include products, content and operations management systems, and professional services for two-way hybrid fiber coax broadband networks delivering video, voice, and data. Prior to fiscal year 2008, we reported our results of operations based upon two operating segments; Broadband Systems Solutions and Network Services. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company sold certain assets and liabilities related to the Company’s field services business which was a component of its Network Services business segment. The field services operations are classified as discontinued operations.

InAs ~~the~~a ~~normal course of business~~result, ~~the~~beginning ~~Company~~in isfiscal ~~party~~year ~~to certain off-balance sheet arrangements~~2008, ~~including indemnification~~we obligations and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit and performance or surety bonds (see Notes 8 and 13). The Company’s Network Services segment uses surety bonds to secureoperate ~~performance obligations as a contractor~~ in ~~various~~one ~~state~~industry ~~and local jurisdictions~~segment. ToOur ~~the~~product ~~extent~~categories that surety bonds become unavailable, the Company would need to replace the surety bonds or seek to secure the bonds or the Company’s obligation to reimburse the surety with letters of credit, cash deposits, or other suitable forms of collateral. As of March 30, 2007, the Company had $2,142 of outstanding surety bonds. Liabilities related to these arrangements are ~~not~~as ~~reflected~~follows: in the consolidated balance sheets, and the Company does not expect any material impact on its cash flows, results of operations or financial condition to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements.

~~The~~• ~~Company’s~~Access ~~Broadband~~products ~~Systems~~and ~~Solutions~~services, ~~segment~~include ~~licenses~~network ~~software~~infrastructure toproducts, ~~its~~including ~~customers~~the ~~under~~Company’s ~~written~~amplitude ~~agreements.~~modulation ~~Each~~headend/hub ~~agreement~~optical ~~contains~~platform ~~the~~and ~~relevant~~line ~~terms~~ of ~~the contractual~~optical ~~arrangement with the customer~~nodes, and ~~generally~~a ~~includes~~full ~~provisions~~offering ~~for~~of ~~indemnifying~~radio ~~the~~frequency ~~customer against losses~~amplifiers, ~~expenses,~~as ~~and~~well ~~liabilities~~as ~~from~~related ~~damages~~professional ~~that~~services ~~may~~for beengineering, ~~awarded~~design, ~~against~~and ~~the~~deployment ~~customer in the event the software is found to infringe upon certain intellectual property rights~~ of aadvanced ~~third~~applications ~~party.~~over ~~Each~~broadband ~~agreement~~networks, ~~generally~~including ~~limits~~network ~~the~~design, ~~scope~~network ofintegration, and ~~remedies~~consulting ~~for~~to ~~such indemnification obligations in~~ a variety of ~~industry-standard respects~~customers. ~~The Company has not identified any losses that are probable under these provisions and, accordingly, no liability related to these indemnification provisions has been recorded.~~

~~15.~~• ~~SEGMENT~~Content ~~INFORMATION~~ and operations management systems, include software, hardware, and support for the delivery of video on demand and digital advertising as well as application-oriented, operational support software for managing bandwidth and resource utilization, network and service assurance, and mobile workforce automation.

~~The~~Net ~~“management~~sales ~~approach”~~for ~~required~~the ~~under~~thirteen-week ~~SFAS~~period ~~No.~~ended September ~~131~~28, ~~“Disclosures~~2007 ~~About~~were ~~Segments~~$71.9 ofmillion, an ~~Enterprise~~increase of 19% over the $60.4 million recorded in the same period of the prior year, reflecting higher revenues from the sale of both access products and ~~Related~~content ~~Information~~and operations management systems. Our largest customers during the quarter were Time Warner Cable and Comcast accounting for 34% and 12%,” ~~has~~respectively, of net sales. International customers accounted for 25% ~~been~~of ~~used~~net sales. Gross margins were 43.4% during the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to ~~present~~gross margins of 42.4% for the ~~following~~same ~~segment~~period ~~information~~of the prior year. ~~This~~Gross ~~approach~~margins isincreased ~~based~~during ~~upon~~the quarter for Access, and were partially offset by a decline in Solutions gross margins during the ~~way~~period compared to the ~~management~~same period a year ago. Selling and administrative expense as a percentage of sales was 23.6% for the ~~Company~~thirteen-week ~~organizes~~period ~~segments~~ended ~~within~~September 28, an2007, ~~enterprise~~compared to 23.8% for ~~making~~the ~~operating~~same ~~decisions~~period of the prior year. Research and ~~assessing~~product ~~performance~~development costs as a percent of sales were 12.1% for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to 11.9% for the same period of the prior year.

~~Prior~~At toSeptember 28, ~~fiscal year~~ 2007, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~had ~~reported~~recorded ~~its~~$128.6 ~~results~~million of ~~operations~~goodwill ~~based~~and ~~upon~~$1.2 ~~three~~million ~~operating~~of ~~segments:~~other ~~C-COR~~intangible ~~Access and Transport~~assets, ~~C-COR Solutions, and C-COR Network Services~~net. InWhile angoodwill ~~effort~~is tono ~~improve~~longer ~~operational~~amortized, ~~efficiencies~~we ~~across~~are required ~~the~~to ~~organization~~assess ~~and~~whether ~~reduce~~goodwill ~~costs,~~is ~~the~~impaired ~~Company~~at ~~has~~least ~~reorganized~~annually ~~aspects of its business~~ and ~~combined~~more ~~the~~frequently ~~C-COR~~if ~~Access~~circumstances ~~and~~warrant. ~~Transport~~In ~~and~~the ~~C-COR~~future, ~~Solutions~~if ~~segment~~an ~~into~~impairment ~~the Broadband~~of ~~Systems~~goodwill ~~Solutions~~is ~~segment.~~indicated, Asit acould result, ~~beginning~~ in ~~fiscal~~a ~~year~~substantial ~~2007,~~charge ~~the~~to ~~Company~~earnings, ~~began~~which ~~reporting~~would ~~its~~have ~~results~~a material ofadverse ~~operations~~effect ~~based~~on ~~upon~~our ~~two~~results ~~operating~~of ~~segments:~~operation ~~Broadband Systems Solutions~~ and ~~Network~~financial ~~Services.~~position ~~Prior~~in ~~year~~the ~~segment~~period ~~data~~in ~~has been~~which ~~restated~~such toimpairment ~~reflect~~is ~~this change~~recorded.

The following costs and asset categories are not allocated to segments and are reflected in the table as “unallocated items”:

• Income tax expense (benefit); and

• Identifiable assets of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and other short-term investments, and certain other long-term corporate assets.

~~Information~~Results ~~about~~of ~~the~~Operations ~~Company’s industry segments for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006 is as follows:~~

	BroadbandSystemsSolutions			NetworkServices			Unallocated			Total
Thirteen week period ended March 30, 2007:
Net sales
Products	$	56,260		$	—		$	—		$	56,260
Content and operation management systems		15,536			—			—			15,536
Services		—			10,897			—			10,897
Total net sales		71,796			10,897			—			82,693
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		2,265			100			(432	)		1,933
Income (loss) from operations		8,701			(1,235	)		—			7,466
Income tax expense		—			—			708			708
Identifiable assets at March 30, 2007		246,370			16,240			100,643			363,253
Capital expenditures		1,884			29			—			1,913
Thirteen week period ended March 24, 2006:
Net sales
Products	$	35,765		$	—		$	—		$	35,765
Content and operation management systems		10,560			—			—			10,560
Services		—			14,057			—			14,057
Total net sales		46,325			14,057			—			60,382
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		2,346			122			—			2,468
Income (loss) from operations		(8,849	)		818			—			(8,031	)
Income tax expense		—			—			676			676
Identifiable assets at March 24, 2006		213,321			23,986			54,865			292,172
Capital expenditures		559			197			—			756
Thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007:
Net sales
Products	$	154,213		$	—		$	—		$	154,213
Content and operation management systems		44,151			—			—			44,151
Services		—			34,049			—			34,049
Total net sales		198,364			34,049			—			232,413
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		6,695			316			(432	)		6,579
Income (loss) from operations		17,405			(1,842	)		—			15,563
Income tax expense		—			—			2,358			2,358
Identifiable assets at March 30, 2007		246,370			16,240			100,643			363,253
Capital expenditures		4,251			216			—			4,467
Thirty-nine week period ended March 24, 2006:
Net sales
Products	$	112,952		$	—		$	—		$	112,952
Content and operation management systems		38,832			—			—			38,832
Services		—			38,760			—			38,760
Total net sales		151,784			38,760			—			190,544
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		8,292			346			—			8,638
Income (loss) from operations		(38,982	)		1,701			—			(37,281	)
Income tax expense		—			—			1,994			1,994
Identifiable assets at March 24, 2006		213,321			23,986			54,865			292,172
Capital expenditures		3,959			593			—			4,552

The Company’s condensed consolidated results of continuing operations for the thirteen-week periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006 as a percentage of net sales are as follows:


	Percentages of Net Sales Thirteen Weeks Ended
	September 28, 2007		September 29, 2006
Net sales:
Products	72.3	%	76.3	%
Content and operations management systems	26.4		21.1
Services	1.3		2.6

Total net sales	100.0		100.0

Cost of sales:
Products	44.4		48.4
Content and operations management systems	10.9		7.6
Services	1.3		1.6

Total cost of sales	56.6		57.6

Gross margin	43.4		42.4

Operating expenses:
Selling and administrative	23.6		23.8
Research and product development	12.1		11.9
Amortization of intangibles	0.9		1.4
Loss on sale of product line	—		0.4
Restructuring costs	0.3		0.7

Total operating expenses	36.9		38.2

Income from operations	6.5		4.2

Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(0.5	)	(0.6	)
Investment income	2.1		1.2
Foreign exchange gain	0.7		0.0
Other income, net	0.1		0.1

Income before income taxes	8.9		4.9
Income tax expense	1.2		1.3

Income from continuing operations	7.7	%	3.6	%

The ~~Company~~tables ~~and~~below ~~its~~set ~~subsidiaries~~forth ~~operate~~our innet ~~various~~sales ~~geographic~~for ~~areas.~~the ~~The~~thirteen-week ~~table~~periods ~~below~~ended ~~presents~~September 28, ~~the~~2007 ~~Company’s sales~~and bySeptember 29, ~~geographic~~2006, ~~area:~~for each of our product categories.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007		March 24,2006
	(in millions of dollars)
Sales:
	September 28,2007				Change from Prior Period	September 29,2006
United States	$	65,984	$	43,394
Product Category	Net Sales		%		%	Net Sales		%
Europe		11,403		11,602
Access products and services	$	52.9	74		11	$	47.7	79
Asia		2,702		2,931
Content and operations management systems		19.0	26		50		12.7	21
Canada		552		795
Consolidated	$	71.9	100		19	$	60.4	100
Latin America		2,052		1,660
Total	$	82,693	$	60,382
	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007		March 24,2006
Sales:
United States	$	189,840	$	131,965
Europe		28,642		39,869
Asia		6,695		11,453
Canada		1,487		2,340
Latin America		5,749		4,917
Total	$	232,413	$	190,544

~~16.~~The ~~GAIN~~table ONbelow ~~LITIGATION~~sets ~~JUDGMENT~~forth our net sales for the thirteen-week periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006 by geographic region.

On April 20, 2006, the Company received a payment of $8,021, as a settlement resulting from litigation against SeaChange International, Inc for patent infringement. The award included damages, enhanced damages, interest and a percentage of attorney fees. Portions of the award are subject to contractual agreements with two third parties that provide for payment to each third party of a portion of the award amount. The Company recorded a gain of $1,238, net of a recovery of attorney fees of $407, from the distribution as a component of other income in its consolidated statement of operations during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. An initial distribution of a portion of the award was made to one of the third parties on June 30, 2006 in the amount of $3,168. The remaining $3,208 has been recorded as an accrued liability in the Company’s consolidated condensed balance sheet as of March 30, 2007, pending resolution of a dispute over which components of the award were subject to the terms of agreement with one of the third parties, which has not yet been resolved. The Company believes that the dispute will be resolved within the next 12 months. Any subsequent gain, if any, resulting from settlement of the award would be recorded by the Company at the time of resolution.


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	(in millions of dollars)
	September 28, 2007			Change from Prior Period	September 29, 2006
Geographic Region	Net Sales		%	%	Net Sales		%
United States	$	54.0	75	13	$	47.7	79
Europe		10.4	14	30		8.0	14
Asia		2.8	4	33		2.1	3
Canada		1.4	2	180		.5	1
Latin America		3.3	5	57		2.1	3

Consolidated	$	71.9	100	19	$	60.4	100

~~Item~~Net 2Sales. ~~Management’s~~Net ~~Discussion~~sales ~~and~~increased ~~Analysis~~19% for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to the same period of ~~Financial~~the ~~Condition~~prior ~~and~~year. ~~Results~~The higher revenues for the thirteen-week period resulted primarily from increased sales of ~~Operations~~both access products and content and operations management systems. These increases were partially offset by a decline in revenue from technical services.

~~General~~Sales of access products and services increased 11% for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to the same period of the prior year. Sales of access products increased as a result of upgrade requirements of Time Warner and Comcast, as well as certain other domestic customers. We believe the increased revenues for access products in general, relate to upgrades by domestic cable operators to expand system bandwidth requirements in order to provide enhanced broadband services, including high definition television, high-speed Internet, voice over Internet, voice over Internet Protocol, digital video, and interactive and on demand video services. Sales of access products to international customers increased during the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, primarily in Europe, Latin America, and Asia. Sales of content and operations management systems increased 50% for the thirteen week-period ended September 28, 2007, due primarily to higher sales to Charter and Time Warner, as well as sales to international customers, primarily in Latin America and Europe. Our content and operations management systems revenues are derived from sales under multiple element arrangements whereby revenues are recognized using the completed contract method of accounting or, in some cases, are recognized ratably over the delivery period. As a result, systems revenues are affected by the timing of new orders and customer acceptance requirements. Software license and associated professional services revenue for our mobile workforce software product line is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting due to our ability to reliably estimate contract costs at the inception of the contracts.

~~The~~Domestic sales ~~following~~increased ~~discussion~~13% ~~addresses~~for the ~~financial condition of C~~thirteen-~~COR~~week ~~Incorporated~~period asended ~~of March~~September 3028, 2007, ~~and~~ ~~the~~compared ~~results~~to ofthe ~~our~~same ~~operations~~period ~~for~~of the ~~thirteen~~prior ~~week~~year, ~~and~~primarily ~~thirty-nine~~driven ~~week~~by ~~periods~~an ~~ended~~increase ~~March 30,~~in ~~2007,~~content ~~compared~~and tooperations ~~the~~management ~~same~~systems ~~periods~~sales ofwith ~~the~~Charter ~~prior~~and ~~fiscal~~Time ~~year.~~Warner, ~~This~~as ~~discussion~~well as ~~should~~an beincrease ~~read~~ in ~~conjunction~~sales ~~with~~of ~~the~~access ~~Management’s Discussion~~products ~~and~~with ~~Analysis~~Time ~~section~~Warner ~~for~~and ~~the~~Comcast, ~~fiscal~~which ~~year~~where ~~ended~~partially ~~June 30,~~offset ~~2006,~~by ~~included~~lower inaccess ~~the~~product ~~Company’s~~sales ~~Annual~~to ~~Report~~Cox onCommunications ~~Form~~in ~~10-K~~the period.

~~Disclosure Regarding~~International ~~Forward~~sales increased 41% for the thirteen-~~Looking~~week ~~Statements~~period ended September 28, 2007, compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in the quarter was primarily a result of an increase in access products sales in Europe, Latin America, and Asia, as well as an increase in content and operations management systems sales primarily in Latin America and Europe. We believe that future capital spending in European markets will be primarily driven by increased competition for enhanced broadband services requiring telecommunication providers to upgrade their networks to support these enhanced services. We expect demand for our product line offerings in international markets will continue to be highly variable. The international markets represent distinct markets in which capital spending decisions for access products and content and operations management systems are affected by a variety of factors, including access to financing and general economic conditions.

~~Some~~Backlog: ofThe ~~the~~table ~~information~~below ~~presented~~sets inforth this report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, among others, our ~~ability~~backlog to develop and expand our product offerings, our continued investment in research and product development, fluctuations in network upgrade activity and the level of future network upgrade activity, both domestically and internationally, future capital spending in European markets being driven by upgrades made by telecommunication providers to their networks in response to increased competition for enhanced broadband services, fluctuations in the global demand for our products, services and software, future sales revenue of our segments, including the anticipated decline in sales revenue for our Network Services segment in fiscal year 2008, both domestically and internationally, demand for our product ~~line~~category ~~offerings~~as ~~in international markets, the effect~~ of ~~revenue levels in general~~September 28, ~~sales~~2007 ~~mix,~~compared competitive pricing, the timing of new product introductions and the timing of deployments of our content management and operational support software systems on our future overall gross margin, our expectation to ~~maintain valuation allowances related to net tax benefits arising from~~ ~~temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards~~June 29, ~~our~~2007: intention to continue our initiatives to achieve cost-effective operations, the adequacy of our cash and cash equivalent balances and our marketable securities to cover our operating cash requirements over the next 24 months, statements relating to our business strategy and the effect of accounting pronouncements required to be adopted by the Company. Forward-looking statements represent our judgment regarding future events. Although we believe we have a reasonable basis for these forward-looking statements, we cannot guarantee their accuracy and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated due to a number of known and unknown uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, among others, capital spending patterns of the communications industry, our ability to develop new and enhanced products, the timing for scheduled completion of certain projects and customer acceptance requirements, continued industry consolidation, the development of competing technologies, the effect of increased competition from satellite providers and telephone companies on the capital spending budgets of our cable customers, changes in the credit profiles of major customers that would lead us to restrict new orders of products and services or record an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts, timing of recognizing software revenues, changes in our sales mix, the effect of competitive pricing, an impairment of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet, the success of our initiatives to achieve cost-effective operations, our ability to convert our backlog into sales, and our ability to achieve our strategic objectives. For additional information concerning these and other important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from expectations and underlying assumptions, please refer to the reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Business Overview


Backlog as of September 28, 2007:	(in millions of dollars)
Product Category	12-month backlog		Greater than 12-month backlog		Total Backlog		% of Total
Access products and services	$	22.4	$	—	$	22.4	28
Content and operations management systems		42.5		16.4		58.9	72

Total contract backlog	$	64.9	$	16.4	$	81.3	100

% of total		80		20		100

Backlog as of June 29, 2007:	(in millions of dollars)
Product Category	12-month backlog		Greater than 12-month backlog		Total Backlog		% of Total
Access products and services	$	31.0	$	—	$	31.0	34
Content and operations management systems		43.0		18.3		61.3	66

Total contract backlog	$	74.0	$	18.3	$	92.3	100

% of total		80		20		100

We are a global provider of communications equipment, software solutions and technical services for two-way hybrid fiber coax broadband networks delivering video, voice and data.

Prior to fiscal year 2007, we reported our results of operations based upon three operating segments: C-COR Access and Transport, C-COR Solutions, and C-COR Network Services. In an effort to improve operational efficiencies across the organization and reduce costs, we have reorganized aspects of our business and combined the C-COR Access and Transport and C-COR Solutions segment into the Broadband Systems Solutions segment. As a result, beginning in fiscal year 2007, we began reporting our results of operations based upon two operating segments: Broadband Systems Solutions and Network Services. Prior year segment data has been restated to reflect this change.

The Broadband Systems Solutions segment is responsible for the development, management, production, deployment, support and sale of unified solutions for delivering voice, video and data services over complex networks for residential and business subscribers, including:

• Network infrastructure products, including the Company’s amplitude modulation headend/hub optical platform and line of optical nodes, and a full offering of radio frequency amplifiers, and

~~The~~Our ~~Network~~total ~~Services~~contract ~~segment~~backlog ~~provides~~is ~~technical~~defined ~~services~~as ~~for~~the ~~engineering,~~revenue ~~design,~~we ~~and~~expect ~~deployment~~to ofgenerate ~~advanced~~in future periods from existing customer ~~applications~~contracts. Our 12-month backlog is defined as the revenue we expect to generate from customer contracts over ~~broadband~~the ~~networks,~~next ~~including~~12 ~~installation~~months. The majority of orders in backlog for Access products and services, ~~network~~typically ~~design~~result in revenue over the next six months. Content and ~~engineering,~~operations ~~network~~management ~~integration~~systems orders include software license fees, ~~outside~~maintenance ~~plant~~fees, systems and ~~construction~~ services specified in executed contracts, for which the timing of revenue can be affected by both contract performance and ~~consulting~~the application of accounting principles to the specific terms of the contract, typically resulting in the recognition of revenues over longer periods. As a ~~variety~~result, a portion of ~~customers~~our content and operations management systems backlog is expected to generate revenues in periods that extend beyond the next 12 months.

~~Net~~Our ~~sales~~backlog ~~for~~methodology ~~the~~requires ~~thirteen~~us ~~week~~to ~~period~~make ~~ended~~judgments ~~March 30,~~about ~~2007 were $82.7 million, an increase of 37% over~~ the ~~$60.4~~timing ~~million recorded in the same period~~ of ~~the~~implementation ~~prior year, reflecting higher revenues from the sale of products~~ and ~~content~~deployment schedules ~~and~~based ~~operations~~upon ~~management~~our ~~systems.~~historical ~~This increase was partially offset by a reduction in technical services revenues during the quarter~~experience. ~~During~~Backlog ~~the~~can ~~thirteen-week~~change ~~period~~due ~~ended March 30, 2007, we made a strategic decision~~ to ~~de-emphasize certain projects of our Network Services operating segment where we cannot compete profitably, and on~~ a ~~going~~number ~~forward basis, be more selective with the types~~ of ~~service we provide. As a result~~factors, weincluding ~~anticipate~~unforeseen ~~our~~changes ~~Network Services segment sales to decline~~ in ~~fiscal~~development ~~year~~and ~~2008.~~implementation ~~Our largest customers during the quarter were Time Warner Cable~~schedules, ~~Cox~~contract ~~Communications,~~renegotiations ~~and~~or ~~Comcast Corporation accounting for 34%~~terminations, ~~15%~~or ~~and~~changes ~~14%,~~in ~~respectively,~~customer offinancial ~~net sales~~conditions. ~~International~~In ~~customers~~addition, ~~accounted~~changes ~~for~~in ~~20%~~foreign ofcurrency ~~net~~exchange ~~sales.~~rates ~~Gross~~may ~~margins~~also ~~were~~affect ~~41.6% during~~ the ~~thirteen~~amount ~~week period ended March 30, 2007, compared to gross margins~~ of ~~32.7%~~revenue ~~for~~actually ~~the~~recognized ~~same~~in ~~period~~future ~~of the prior year~~periods. ~~Gross margins increased during the quarter for both products and content and operations management systems~~Accordingly, ~~and~~there ~~were~~can ~~partially~~be ~~offset~~no byassurance athat ~~decline~~contracts included in ~~technical~~backlog ~~services~~will ~~gross~~actually ~~margins~~generate ~~during~~ the anticipated ~~period~~revenues ~~compared~~or tothat the ~~same~~actual ~~period~~revenues awill ~~year~~be ~~ago.~~generated ~~Product~~as ~~gross~~indicated ~~margins~~ for the ~~same~~ ~~period~~corresponding of12-month ~~the~~or ~~prior~~greater ~~year~~than ~~were~~12-month ~~adversely~~periods. ~~affected~~We bymake amanagement ~~$618,000~~decisions ~~charge~~based ~~related~~on toour ~~inventory~~backlog, ~~associated~~including ~~with~~hiring ~~certain transport product lines due to the Company’s decision to cease selling certain product lines. Selling and administrative expense as a percent~~ of ~~sales were 20% for the thirteen week period ended March 30~~personnel, ~~2007,~~purchasing ~~compared to 24.6% for the same period~~ of materials, ~~the prior year. Research~~ and ~~product~~other ~~development~~matters ~~costs~~that asmay aincrease ~~percent~~our ofproduction ~~sales~~capabilities ~~were~~and 10costs.5% ~~for~~Cancellations, ~~the~~delays ~~thirteen~~or ~~week period~~reductions ~~ended~~of ~~March 30,~~orders ~~2007,~~or ~~compared~~contracts tocould ~~14.7%~~adversely ~~for~~affect ~~the~~our ~~same~~results ~~period~~ of ~~the~~operations ~~prior~~and ~~year~~financial condition.

AtGross ~~March 30, 2007, we had recorded $131~~Margin.0 ~~million~~The ~~of goodwill~~following ~~and~~table ~~$2.6~~sets ~~million~~forth ofour ~~other~~gross ~~intangible~~margins ~~assets,~~by ~~net.~~product ~~While~~category ~~goodwill is no longer amortized, we are required to assess whether goodwill is impaired at least annually and more frequently if circumstances warrant. Our annual assessment was performed~~ during the thirteen -week period ended ~~March~~September 3028, 2007, ~~and~~compared ~~no impairment was indicated. In the future, if an impairment of goodwill is indicated, it could result in a substantial charge~~ to ~~earnings, which would have a material adverse~~the ~~effect~~same onperiod ~~our results~~ of ~~operation and financial position in~~ the ~~period~~prior ~~in which such impairment is recorded~~year.


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
Product Category	September 28, 2007 Gross Margin %	Change Points		September 29, 2006 Gross Margin %
Access products and services	37.9	1.3		36.6
Content and operations management systems	58.6	(5.2	)	63.8
Consolidated	43.4	1.0		42.4

Consolidated gross margins were 43.4% for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to 42.4% for the same period of the prior year. Gross margins of access products and services increased for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, as a result of higher volumes and changes in sales mix during the periods. Gross margins of content and operations management systems declined for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007 due primarily to lower sales volume of operational support software systems sales. We anticipate that our future gross margins will continue to be affected by many factors, including revenue levels in general, sales mix, competitive pricing pressures, the timing of new product introductions and the timing of deployments for certain of our content management and operational support software solutions.

Selling and Administrative. Selling and administrative expenses were $17.0 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007 compared to $14.4 million for the same period of the prior year. Selling and administrative expenses increased 18% for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, primarily as a result of higher stock-based compensation expense and $1.2 million of transaction costs related to the proposed merger with ARRIS. Selling and administrative expense remained relatively flat as a percent of sales at 23.6% for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to 23.8% for the same period of the prior year.

Research and Product Development. Research and product development expenses were $8.7 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to $7.2 million for the same period of the prior year. Research and product development expenses increased 21% for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, due to higher personnel costs and higher stock-based compensation expense. Our research and product development expenses consist primarily of the compensation of development personnel, depreciation of development and test equipment, project expenses to support product development initiatives, and program services. We believe sustained commitment to product development efforts will be required for us to remain competitive, and anticipate continuing investments in research and product development in future periods related to network infrastructure products and content and operations management systems.

Interest Expense and Investment Income. Interest expense was $341,000 for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to $360,000 for the same period of the prior year. The decrease in interest expense resulted primarily from lower financing costs associated with certain software license purchases.

~~Results~~Investment income was $1.5 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to $695,000 for the same period of ~~Operations~~the prior year. The increase in investment income was a result of a higher average investment balance and improved investment returns during the period.

~~The~~Income ~~following~~Tax ~~table~~Expense. ~~contains~~Income ~~information~~tax ~~regarding~~expense ~~the~~was ~~percentage~~$911,000 offor ~~net~~the ~~sales~~thirteen-week ofperiod ~~our~~ended ~~condensed~~September 28, ~~consolidated~~2007, ~~statements~~compared ofto ~~operations~~$764,000 for the ~~thirteen~~same ~~week~~period ~~and~~of ~~thirty-nine~~the prior year. Income tax expense for the thirteen-week ~~periods~~period ended ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 arose primarily from the following: recognition of additional valuation allowance, current taxes paid or payable for state and ~~March 24~~foreign income tax in those jurisdictions where offsetting loss carryforwards are not available or are limited, ~~2006~~and from a decrease in valuation allowance due to the utilization of acquired net operating loss carryforwards for which the tax benefit is recorded as a decrease in goodwill.

	Percentages of Net Sales
	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007		March 24,2006		March 30, 2007		March 24,2006
Net sales:
Products	68.0	%	59.2	%	66.4	%	59.3	%
Content and operations management systems	18.8		17.5		19.0		20.4
Services	13.2		23.3		14.6		20.3
Total net sales	100.0		100.0		100.0		100.0
Cost of sales:
Products	38.4		36.1		39.6		37.9
Content and operations management systems	7.9		10.1		7.3		10.5
Services	12.1		20.1		13.5		17.7
Excess and obsolete inventory charge	0.0		1.0		0.0		4.4
Total cost of sales	58.4		67.3		60.4		70.5
Gross margin	41.6		32.7		39.6		29.5
Operating expenses:
Selling and administrative	20.0		24.6		20.5		26.4
Research and product development	10.5		14.7		10.5		15.5
Amortization of intangibles	1.0		1.5		1.1		1.9
Impairment charges	0.0		3.0		0.0		3.7
Loss (gain) on sale of product line	0.0		(3.2	)	0.1		(1.0	)
Restructuring charge	1.1		5.4		0.7		2.6
Total operating expenses	32.6		46.0		32.9		49.1
Income (loss) from operations	9.0		(13.3	)	6.7		(19.6	)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(0.4	)	(0.6	)	(0.5	)	(0.5	)
Investment income	1.1		0.7		1.0		0.6
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	(0.3	)	0.8		0.0		0.1
Other income, net	0.4		0.3		0.2		0.2
Income (loss) before income taxes	9.8		(12.1	)	7.4		(19.2	)
Income tax expense	0.9		1.1		1.0		1.0
Net income (loss)	8.9	%	(13.2	)%	6.4	%	(20.2	)%

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	September 28, 2007			June 29, 2007
	(In millions of dollars)
Balance sheet data (at period end)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	61.0		$	54.9
Marketable securities		71.5			53.5

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	September 28, 2007			September 29, 2006
	(In millions of dollars)
Statements of cash flows data:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	21.9		$	5.0
Net cash provided used in investing activities		(19.2	)		(2.3	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		2.9			1.2

The aggregate of our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities increased $24.1 million as of September 28, 2007, primarily as a result of positive cash flow generated from operations during the thirteen-week period. Working capital was $147.3 million at September 28, 2007 compared to $133.0 million at June 29, 2007.

As of September 28, 2007, we had total restricted cash of $5.1 million. Restricted cash relates to commitments under the terms of our letter of credit agreement with a bank, where we are required to maintain cash collateral of 102% of the amount that can be drawn on issued letters of credit, as well as bank guarantees associated with certain vendor obligations. The restricted cash balances are classified in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as either current or long-term, depending upon the expiration term associated with the commitment (see Note 14).

Net cash provided by operating activities was $21.9 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to $5.0 million for the same period of the prior year. The major reason for the increase in cash generated from operating activities in the period was the reduction of accounts receivables, including collections associated with our field services business that was sold as of June 29, 2007. Other major elements of cash provided by operations for the thirteen- week period ended September 28, 2007 include net income for the period of $5.0 million, which is adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation, and a decrease of $4.3 million in inventory due to lower purchases and the consumption of on-hand inventories during the period. These changes were partially offset by decreases in accounts payables and accrued liabilities, which resulted primarily from a $3.2 million payout to a third-party for a portion of proceeds received on a litigation judgment and $5.6 million related to payout of incentive compensation accrued as of June 29, 2007, for which payments were made during the period.

Net cash used in investing activities was $19.2 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 28, 2007, compared to $2.3 million for the same period of the prior year. The cash used in investing activities during the thirteen-week period was primarily comprised of $42.1 million for the purchase of marketable securities and $1.6 million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, which were offset by proceeds from sale and maturities of marketable securities of $24.5 million. The cash used in investing activities during the same period of the prior year was $1.7 million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and $4.6 million for the purchase of marketable securities, which were offset by proceeds from maturities of marketable securities of $3.6 million and $388,000 cash proceeds from the sale of a product line.

~~The~~Net ~~tables~~cash ~~below~~provided ~~set~~by ~~forth~~financing ~~our~~activities ~~net~~was ~~sales~~$2.9 million for the thirteen -week ~~and~~period ~~thirty-nine~~ended September 28, 2007, compared to $1.2 million for the same period of the prior year. Cash provided by financing activities during the thirteen-week ~~periods~~period ended ~~March~~September 3028, 2007, ~~and March 24~~resulted primarily from proceeds from the exercise of stock options, ~~2006~~which were partially offset by debt and capital lease payments. The cash provided by financing activities during the same period of the prior year were primarily from proceeds from the exercise of stock options, ~~for~~as ~~each~~well as $447,000 of ~~our~~proceeds ~~reportable~~received ~~segments~~from financing arrangements, which were offset by debt and capital lease payments.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	(in millions of dollars)
	March 30, 2007			Change from Prior Period %		March 24, 2006
Operating Segment	Net Sales		%			Net Sales		%
Broadband Systems Solutions:
Products	$	56.3	68	57		$	35.8	59
Content and operations management systems		15.5	19	46			10.6	18
Total Broadband Systems Solutions		71.8	87	55			46.4	77
Network Services		10.9	13	(22	)		14.0	23
	$	82.7	100	37		$	60.4	100

On November 1, 2007, we amended our credit agreement of November 5, 2004 (as amended, the “ Credit Agreement”) with a bank for a $10 million revolving letter of credit facility. Under the Credit Agreement, the $10 million may be used solely for the issuance of letters of credit which must be fully cash collateralized at the time of issuance. We are required to maintain with the bank cash collateral of 102% of the amount that can be drawn on the issued letters of credit. This collateral can be drawn on upon the occurrence of any event of default under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement contains standard event of default provisions, but no financial covenants. The Credit Agreement is committed through October 31, 2008. The applicable margin under the Credit Agreement is 0.65%, payable quarterly in arrears. In the event that a letter of credit is drawn upon, the interest rate for any unreimbursed drawing is the bank’s floating prime rate.

	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	(in millions of dollars)
	March 30, 2007			Change from Prior Period %		March 24, 2006
Operating Segment	Net Sales		%			Net Sales		%
Broadband Systems Solutions:
Products	$	154.2	66	37		$	112.9	59
Content and operations management systems		44.2	19	14			38.8	21
Total Broadband Systems Solutions		198.4	85	31			151.7	80
Network Services		34.0	15	(12	)		38.8	20
	$	232.4	100	22		$	190.5	100

The table below sets forth our net sales for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006 by geographic region.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	(in millions of dollars)
	March 30, 2007			Change from Prior Period %		March 24, 2006
Geographic Region	Net Sales		%			Net Sales		%
United States	$	66.0	80	52		$	43.4	72
Europe		11.4	14	(2	)		11.6	19
Asia		2.7	3	(7	)		2.9	5
Canada		.5	1	(38	)		.8	1
Latin America		2.1	2	24			1.7	3
Consolidated	$	82.7	100	37		$	60.4	100

	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	(in millions of dollars)
	March 30, 2007			Change from Prior Period %		March 24, 2006
Geographic Region	Net Sales		%			Net Sales		%
United States	$	189.8	82	44		$	132.0	69
Europe		28.6	12	(28	)		39.9	21
Asia		6.7	3	(41	)		11.4	6
Canada		1.5	1	(35	)		2.3	1
Latin America		5.8	2	18			4.9	3
Consolidated	$	232.4	100	22		$	190.5	100

Net Sales. Net sales increased 37% and 22% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year. The higher revenues for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods resulted primarily from increased sales of products and content and operations management systems. These increases were partially offset by a decline in revenue from technical services.

Broadband Systems Solutions segment sales increased 55% and 31% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year. The sales of network products increased 57% and 37% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, primarily as a result of increased upgrade requirements for domestic customers. Sales of network products to international customers were up slightly during the thirteen week period ended March 30, 2007, primarily in Europe and Latin America, but reflect a decline for the thirty-nine week period as a result of lower sales to certain customers in Europe and Asia. We believe the increased revenues for network products is related to expansion and upgrades by Time Warner and Comcast, as a result of their acquisitions of substantially all of the assets of Adelphia Communications Corporation, and in general, upgrades by domestic cable operators to expand system bandwidth requirements in order to provide enhanced broadband services, including high definition television, high-speed Internet, voice over Internet, voice over Internet Protocol, digital video, and interactive and on demand video services. Content and operations management systems sales increased 46% and 14% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, due primarily to higher revenues of content and operations management systems to Time Warner, which was partially offset by lower sales to international customers, primarily in Europe and Canada. Content and operations management systems revenues are derived from sales under multiple element arrangements whereby revenues are recognized using the completed contract method of accounting or, in some cases, are recognized ratably over the delivery period. As a result, systems revenues are affected by the timing of new orders and customer acceptance requirements. Software license and associated professional services revenue for our mobile workforce software product line is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting due to our ability to reliably estimate contract costs at the inception of the contracts.

Network Services segment sales decreased 22% and 12% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year. The lower sales were primarily the result of the completion of upgrade projects with a certain customer as of the end of fiscal year 2006. The Company anticipates its Network Services segment sales to decline in fiscal year 2008, as we plan to de-emphasize certain services for which we cannot compete profitably and become more selective as we move forward with the types of service we provide.

Domestic sales increased 52% and 44% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, due primarily to increased Broadband Systems Solutions segment sales to Time Warner Cable, Cox Communications, and Comcast Corporation, which were partially offset by lower Network Services segment sales.

International sales decreased 2% and 27% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively. The slight decline in the quarter was a result of lower content and operations management systems sales which more than offset an increase in network product sales during the period. The decline for the thirty-nine week period is due primarily to lower Broadband Systems Solutions segment sales of network products due to lower sales to certain customers, primarily in Europe and Asia. We believe that future capital spending in European markets will be primarily driven by increased competition for enhanced broadband services requiring telecommunication providers to upgrade their networks to support these enhanced services. We expect demand for our product line offerings in international markets will continue to be highly variable. The international markets represent distinct markets in which capital spending decisions for network equipment and solutions are affected by a variety of factors, including access to financing and general economic conditions.

Backlog: The table below sets forth our backlog by operating segment as of March 30, 2007 compared to December 29, 2006:

Backlog as of March 30, 2007:	(in millions of dollars)
Operating Segment	12-month backlog		Greater than 12-month backlog		Total Backlog		% of Total
Broadband Systems Solutions:
Products	$	34.5	$	—	$	34.5	29
Content and operations management systems		45.1		16.6		61.7	53
Total Broadband Systems Solutions		79.6		16.6		96.2	82
Network Services		20.6		—		20.6	18
Total contract backlog	$	100.2	$	16.6	$	116.8	100
% of total		86		14		100
Backlog as of December 29, 2006:	(in millions of dollars)
Operating Segment	12-month backlog		Greater than 12-month backlog		Total Backlog		% of Total
Broadband Systems Solutions:
Products	$	34.5	$	—	$	34.5	29
Content and operations management systems		43.7		15.5		59.2	51
Total Broadband Systems Solutions		78.2		15.5		93.7	80
Network Services		23.6		—		23.6	20
Total contract backlog	$	101.8	$	15.5	$	117.3	100
% of total		87		13		100

Our total contract backlog is defined as the revenue we expect to generate in future periods from existing customer contracts. Our 12-month backlog is defined as the revenue we expect to generate from customer contracts over the next 12 months. For the Broadband Systems Solutions segment, the majority of orders in backlog for products typically result in revenue over the next six months. Orders for content and operations management systems include software license fees, maintenance fees, systems and services specified in executed contracts, for which the timing of revenue can be affected by both contract performance and the application of accounting principles to the specific terms of the contract, typically resulting in the recognition of revenues over longer periods. As a result, a portion of our content and operations management systems backlog is expected to generate revenues in periods that extend beyond the next 12 months. Our Network Services backlog typically includes a portion that will result in revenue over the latter part of the twelve month period. During the thirteen week period ended March 30, 2007 there was a reduction in our Network Services backlog of $3.2 million related to the Company’s decision to exit a certain Network Services contract.

Our backlog methodology requires us to make judgments about the timing of implementation and deployment schedules based upon our historical experience. Backlog can change due to a number of factors, including unforeseen changes in development and implementation schedules, contract renegotiations or terminations, or changes in customer financial conditions. In addition, changes in foreign currency exchange rates may also affect the amount of revenue actually recognized in future periods. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that contracts included in backlog will actually generate the anticipated revenues or that the actual revenues will be generated as indicated for the corresponding 12-month or greater than 12-month periods. We make management decisions based on our backlog, including hiring of personnel, purchasing of materials, and other matters that may increase our production capabilities and costs. Cancellations, delays or reductions of orders or contracts could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Gross Margin. The following table sets forth our gross margins by operating segment during the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 compared to the same periods of the prior year.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
Operating Segment	March 30, 2007 Gross Margin %	Change Points		March 24, 2006 Gross Margin %
Broadband Systems Solutions:
Products	43.6	6.2		37.4
Content and operations management systems	57.7	15.5		42.2
Total Broadband Systems Solutions	46.7	8.2		38.5
Network Services	8.1	(5.5	)	13.6
Consolidated	41.6	8.9		32.7
	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
Operating Segment	March 30, 2007 Gross Margin %	Change Points		March 24, 2006 Gross Margin %
Broadband Systems Solutions:
Products	40.3	11.6		28.7
Content and operations management systems	61.3	12.9		48.4
Total Broadband Systems Solutions	45.0	11.2		33.8
Network Services	7.8	(5.2	)	13.0
Consolidated	39.6	10.1		29.5

Consolidated gross margins were 41.6% and 39.6% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 32.7% and 29.5% for the same periods of the prior year. Broadband Systems Solutions segment gross margins increased for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, for both products and content and operations management systems, as a result of higher volumes and changes in sales mix during the periods. Product gross margins for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods of the prior year were adversely affected by charges of $618,000 and $8.4 million, respectively, related to inventory associated with certain transport product lines, based on management’s assessment of market conditions for those product lines. Network Services segment gross margins declined for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods due to lower sales volume and performance difficulty on certain projects. We anticipate that our future gross margins in both of our business segments will continue to be affected by many factors, including revenue levels in general, sales mix, competitive pricing pressures, the timing of new product introductions and the timing of deployments for certain of our content management and operational support software solutions.

Selling and Administrative. Selling and administrative expenses were $16.5 million and $47.7 million for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to $14.9 million and $50.2 million for the same periods of the prior year. Selling and administrative expenses increased 11% for the thirteen week period ended March 30, 2007, primarily as a result of higher personnel, marketing and administrative expenses. Selling and administrative expenses declined 5% for the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007, primarily as a result of lower personnel and administrative expenses resulting from restructuring initiatives implemented in order to improve our cost structure. Selling and administrative expense declined as a percent of sales to 20.0% and 20.5% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 24.6% and 26.4% for the same periods of the prior year.

Research and Product Development. Research and product development expenses were $8.7 million and $24.2 million for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to $8.9 million and $29.5 million for the same periods of the prior year. Research and product development expenses decreased 2% and 18% for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, due primarily to lower personnel costs resulting from workforce reductions. Our research and product development expenses consist primarily of the compensation of development personnel, depreciation of development and test equipment, project expenses to support product development initiatives, and program services. We believe sustained commitment to product development efforts will be required for us to remain competitive, and anticipate continuing investments in research and product development in future periods related to network infrastructure products and content and operations management systems.

Operating Income (Loss) By Segment. The tables below set forth our operating income (loss), excluding unallocated items, for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 and March 24, 2006, for each of our reportable segments.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	(in millions of dollars)
Operating Segment	March 30, 2007 Operating Income (Loss)			Change from Prior Period$		March 24, 2006 Operating Income (Loss)
Broadband Systems Solutions	$	8.7		17.5		$	(8.8	)
Network Services		(1.2	)	(2.0	)		0.8
	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	(in millions of dollars)
Operating Segment	March 30, 2007 OperatingIncome (Loss)			Change from Prior Period$		March 24, 2006 OperatingIncome (Loss)
Broadband Systems Solutions	$	17.4		56.4		$	(39.0	)
Network Services		(1.8	)	(3.5	)		1.7

The operating income for the Broadband Systems Solutions segment for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, compared to operating losses for the same periods of the prior year, which was attributable to higher revenues and improved gross margins. In addition, the operating losses in the prior year included the previously discussed inventory charges as well as an impairment charge of $7.1 million, including $5.3 million associated with the decision to cease sales and marketing activities related to certain transport product lines, and $1.8 million associated with the divestiture of our operations in Mulgrave, Australia. In addition, we recorded a gain of $2.0 million in the prior year associated with the divestiture of our digital video product line. The operating losses for the Network Services segment for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, compared to operating income for the same periods of the prior year was due to lower revenues and gross margins, as well as restructuring charges incurred during the periods resulting from termination of a certain technical service contract and the strategic decision to de-emphasize certain service offerings.

Investment Expense and Investment Income. Interest expense was $359,000 and $1.1 million for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to $341,000 and $990,000 for the same periods of the prior year. The increase in interest expense resulted primarily from additional financing for the purchase of machinery and equipment in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 and first quarter of fiscal year 2007.

Investment income was $928,000 and $2.4 million for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to $458,000 and $1.1 million for the same periods of the prior year. The increase in investment income was a result of a higher average investment balance and improved investment returns during the periods.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $708,000 and $2.4 million for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007, respectively, compared to $676,000 and $2.0 million for the same periods of the prior year. Income taxes for the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended March 30, 2007 arose primarily from the following: recognition of additional valuation allowance, current taxes paid or payable for federal alternative minimum tax (“AMT”), for which any AMT credit carryforward is offset by a valuation allowance, and state and foreign income tax in those jurisdictions where offsetting loss carryforwards are not available or are limited.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

	March 30, 2007			June 30, 2006
	(In millions of dollars)
Balance sheet data (at period end)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44.4		$	44.7
Marketable securities		47.1			16.3
	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	March 30, 2007			March 24, 2006
	(In millions of dollars)
Statements of cash flows data:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	24.4		$	(13.9	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(34.3	)		2.9
Net cash provided by financing activities		9.3			.6

The aggregate of our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities increased as of March 30, 2007, primarily as a result of positive cash flow generated from operations during the thirty-nine week period. Working capital was $111.1 million at March 30, 2007 compared to $76.4 million at June 30, 2006.

As of March 30, 2007, we had total restricted cash of $4.8 million. Restricted cash relates to commitments under the terms of our letter of credit agreement with a bank, where we are required to maintain cash collateral of 102% of the amount that can be drawn on issued letters of credit, as well as bank guarantees associated with certain vendor obligations. The restricted cash balances are classified in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as either current or long-term, depending upon the expiration term associated with the commitment (see Note 13).

Net cash provided by operating activities was $24.4 million for the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007, compared with net cash used of $13.9 million for the same period of the prior year. The major elements of cash provided by operations for the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007 include net income for the period of $14.8 million, which is adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation, and an increase in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue during the period. These changes were partially offset by increased inventory, accounts receivables and other assets during the period.

Net cash used in investing activities was $34.3 million for the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007 compared to cash provided by investing activities of $2.9 million for the same period of the prior year. The cash used in investing activities during the thirty-nine week period was primarily comprised of $51.6 million for the purchase of marketable securities and $4.5 million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, which were offset by proceeds from sale and maturities of marketable securities of $21.4 million and $388,000 of cash proceeds from the sale of a product line. The major elements of cash provided by investing activities during the same period of the prior year were $16.4 million of proceeds from maturities of marketable securities and $3.3 million from the sale of a product line, which were partially offset by $12.4 million for the purchase of marketable securities and $4.6 million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.3 million for the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007, compared to $584,000 for the same period of the prior year. Cash provided by financing activities during the thirty-nine week period ended March 30, 2007 was primarily a result of $9.6 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options, which were partially offset by payments of debt and capital lease obligations of $283,000. The major element of cash provided by financing activities during the same period of the prior year was $670,000 of proceeds from the exercise of stock options which were partially offset by payments of debt and capital lease obligations of $146,000.

On November 1, 2006, we amended our credit agreement of November 5, 2004 (as amended, the “Agreement”) with a bank for a $10 million revolving letter of credit facility. Under the Agreement, the $10 million may be used solely for the issuance of letters of credit which must be fully cash collateralized at the time of issuance. We are required to maintain with the bank cash collateral of 102% of the amount that can be drawn on the issued letters of credit. This collateral can be drawn on upon the occurrence of any event of default under the Agreement. The Agreement contains standard event of default provisions, but no financial covenants. The Agreement is committed through November 3, 2007. The applicable margin under the Agreement is 0.65%, payable quarterly in arrears. In the event that a letter of credit is drawn upon, the interest rate for any unreimbursed drawing is the bank’s floating prime rate.

Working Capital Outlook

Our main source of liquidity is our unrestricted cash on hand and marketable securities.

Our $35.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes, issued in December 2004, requires semi-annual interest payments at an annual rate of 3.5% on June 30 and December 30. The notes mature on December 30, 2009. As of ~~March~~September 3028, 2007, we had a restructuring accrual of $~~1.6 million which includes $147~~749,000 related toprimarily ~~employee termination benefits~~ to ~~be paid out over the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, and $1.4 million related to~~ contractual obligations for leased facilities and equipment, which will be paid over the respective lease terms through 2014, unless terminated earlier. ~~In addition, additional amounts may be owed to third parties related to a portion of the proceeds we received from a litigation judgment.~~ As of ~~March~~September 3028, 2007, we had accrued $61.4 3 million associated with employee incentive compensation under the Company’s Fiscal Year ~~2007~~2008 Profit Incentive Plan which is expected to be paid in the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal year 2008.

Taking into account the fixed charges associated with our long-term debt obligations, ~~amounts which may be owed to third parties from proceeds received from the litigation judgment,~~ restructuring accruals, and employee incentive compensation payments, we believe remaining cash and cash equivalents balances, and our marketable securities will be adequate to cover our operating cash requirements over the next 24 months. However, we may find it necessary or desirable to seek financing to support our capital needs and provide funds for additional strategic initiatives~~, including acquiring or investing in complementary businesses, products, services, or technologies~~. Accordingly, this may require third-party financing or equity-based financing, such as issuance of common stock, preferred stock, or subordinated convertible debt securities and warrants, which would be dilutive to existing shareholders. We do not currently have any committed lines of credit or other available credit facilities that could be utilized for capital requirements, and it is uncertain whether such facilities could be obtained in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 establishes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for income tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 also prescribes a two-step evaluation process for tax positions. The first step is recognition and the second is measurement. For recognition, an enterprise judgmentally determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. If the tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold it is measured and recognized in the financial statements as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. If a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, no benefit is recognized in the financial statements.

Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date of FIN 48 may be recognized, or continue to be recognized, upon adoption of FIN 48. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 shall be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the fiscal year in which FIN 48 is adopted. FIN 48 will apply to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact FIN 48 will have on our consolidated financial statements when it becomes effective for us in fiscal year 2008 and are unable, at this time, to quantify the impact, if any, on retained earnings at the time of adoption.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. We are currently assessing SFAS No. 157 and have not yet determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our results of operations and financial position when it becomes effective for us in fiscal year 2009.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements,” (“SAB 108”), which addresses how uncorrected errors in previous years should be considered when quantifying errors in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 requires registrants to consider the effect of all carry over and reversing effects of prior-year misstatements when quantifying errors in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 does not change the SEC staff’s previous guidance on evaluating the materiality of errors. SAB 108 allows registrants to record the effects of adopting SAB 108 as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. This adjustment must be reported in the annual financial statements of the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact SAB 108 will have on our consolidated financial statements when it becomes effective for the Company as of June 29, 2007 and we are unable, at this time, to quantify the impact, if any, on our results of operations, financial position and retained earnings at the time of adoption.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing SFAS 159 and have not yet determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on our results of operations and financial position.

In23 June 2006, the FASB ratified EITF No. 06-3, “Disclosure Requirements for Taxes Assessed by a Government Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions.” EITF 06-3 requires disclosure of a company’s accounting policy with respect to presentation of taxes collected on a revenue producing transaction between a seller and a customer. For taxes that are reported on a gross basis (included in revenue and costs), EITF 06-3 also requires disclosure of the amount of taxes included in the financial statements. We record taxes on a net basis. EITF 06-3 was effective for the Company beginning December 30, 2006 and it did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes to the Company’s exposure to market risk since June 3029, ~~2006~~2007.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures related to our reporting and disclosure obligations as of ~~March~~September 3028, 2007, which is the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended ~~March~~September 3028, 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

3124

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

~~There~~Since ~~have~~the ~~been~~filing noof ~~material~~the ~~changes~~Company’s inAnnual ~~the~~Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2007, the Company announced its entry into the merger agreement with ARRIS pursuant to which it will merge with a subsidiary of ARRIS and become a wholly owned subsidiary of ARRIS. The Company’s business ~~risk~~involves ~~factors~~numerous ~~from~~risks, ~~those~~many ~~disclosed~~of inwhich ~~Part~~are Ibeyond our control. The following is a description of certain additional risks related to the proposed merger. For additional information about factors that may affect our business, see Item 1A2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the ~~Company’s~~risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for ~~fiscal~~the year ~~2006~~ended June 29, 2007. For additional information about the factors that affect, or be affected by, the proposed merger with ARRIS, see the preliminary proxy statement filed by the Company on October 15, 2007.

Because the market price of ARRIS common stock will fluctuate, C-COR shareholders cannot be sure of the market value of the ARRIS common stock that they will receive in the merger.

Upon completion of the merger, approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of C-COR common stock will be converted into shares of ARRIS common stock. The ratio at which those shares will be converted will only be adjusted if the average closing price of ARRIS’ common stock is less than $12.83 or more than $15.69. However, even in such event, the adjustments to the exchange ratio are limited and, in the case of a decline in the price of ARRIS’ stock, will not provide C-COR shareholders receiving ARRIS common stock the same value for such shares as was contemplated when the merger agreement was signed. Accordingly, the market value of the ARRIS common stock that C-COR shareholders will be entitled to receive upon completion of the merger will depend on the market value of ARRIS common stock at the time of the completion of the merger and could vary significantly from the market value on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the dates of the ARRIS and C-COR special meetings. The market value of the ARRIS common stock that C-COR shareholders will be entitled to receive in the merger also will continue to fluctuate after the completion of the merger.

Such variations could be the result of changes in the business, operations, or prospects of ARRIS or C-COR before the merger, or the combined company following the merger, market assessments of the likelihood that the merger will be completed or the timing of the completion of the merger, regulatory considerations, general market and economic conditions, and other factors both within and beyond the control of ARRIS and C-COR. Because the date that the merger is completed could be later than the date of the ARRIS and C-COR special meetings, at the time of the special meetings C-COR shareholders may not know with certainty the value of the shares of ARRIS common stock that they will receive upon completion of the merger.

ARRIS and C-COR may elect to proceed with the merger even if the average closing price of the ARRIS common stock is less than $11.41.

Under the merger agreement, either ARRIS or C-COR may terminate the merger agreement in the event that the average closing price of ARRIS’ common stock is less than $11.41. However, termination of the merger agreement in such circumstance is at the discretion of the boards of directors of ARRIS and C-COR and no assurance can be provided that either ARRIS or C-COR will terminate the merger agreement in such circumstance. If the average closing price of ARRIS’ common stock is less than $11.41, the boards of directors of ARRIS and C-COR may still determine that the merger remains in the best interests of their respective companies and shareholders and, therefore, elect to proceed with the merger. In that event, under the terms of the merger agreement, no further adjustment will be made to the exchange ratio for the stock consideration and, as a result, the value of the ARRIS shares a C-COR shareholder receives in the merger could be significantly lower than the value of those shares at the time the merger agreement was signed or at the time of either the ARRIS meeting or the C-COR meeting.

The pendency of the merger could materially adversely affect the future business and operations of ARRIS and C-COR.

In connection with the pending merger, some customers of ARRIS and C-COR may delay or defer decisions, which could negatively impact revenues, earnings, and cash flows of ARRIS and C-COR, as well as the market prices of ARRIS common stock and C-COR

common stock, regardless of whether the merger is completed. Similarly, current and prospective employees of ARRIS and C-COR may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company following the merger, which may materially adversely affect the ability of ARRIS and C-COR to attract and retain key management, sales, marketing, technical, and other personnel.

Directors and executive officers of C-COR may have potential conflicts of interest in recommending that C-COR shareholders vote in favor of the merger agreement.

Some of the directors and executive officers of C-COR have interests in the merger that are different from, and are in addition to, the interests of C-COR shareholders generally. These interests relate to the treatment of options held by directors and executive officers of C-COR in the merger, the payment of severance benefits to certain executive officers of C-COR under certain circumstances following completion of the merger, the appointment of a nominee of C-COR as a director of ARRIS after the merger, ARRIS’ commitment to assume the current employment agreements of C-COR’s executive officers, and ARRIS’ agreement to indemnify C-COR directors and officers from certain claims and to continue certain insurance coverage. You should consider these interests in connection with your vote, including whether these interests may have influenced these directors and executive officers to recommend or support the merger.

C-COR shareholders may receive a combination of consideration different from what they elect, and while such elections are being calculated, may not be able to transfer the shares of ARRIS common stock, if any, to which they may be entitled.

While each C-COR shareholder may elect to receive all cash, all ARRIS common stock, or a combination of cash and ARRIS common stock in the merger, the pools of cash and ARRIS common stock available for all C-COR shareholders will be fixed amounts. Accordingly, depending on the elections made by other C-COR shareholders, even if you elect to receive all cash in the merger, you may receive a portion of your consideration in ARRIS common stock and even if you elect to receive all ARRIS common stock in the merger, you may receive a portion of your consideration in cash. If you elect to receive a combination of cash and ARRIS common stock in the merger, you are likely to receive cash and ARRIS common stock in a proportion different from what you elected. The tax consequences to you from the transaction may be less favorable than you anticipated in the event you receive a greater portion of your consideration in cash than you elected. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” for more information. If you do not submit a properly completed and signed election form to the exchange agent by the election deadline, you will have no control over the type of merger consideration you may receive.

Within five business days of the closing of the merger, ARRIS and the exchange agent will calculate the number and amount of valid cash and stock elections made by C-COR shareholders. The validity of any election will be determined solely by ARRIS, in the exercise of its reasonable discretion. Until ARRIS and the exchange agent complete this calculation, a former holder of C-COR common stock may not be able to sell or otherwise dispose of the shares of ARRIS common stock, if any, to which such holder is entitled.

The merger agreement restricts both C-COR’s and ARRIS’ ability to pursue alternatives to the merger.

The merger agreement contains “no shop” provisions that, subject to limited fiduciary exceptions, restrict C-COR’s ability to directly or indirectly initiate, solicit, encourage, facilitate, discuss, or commit to competing third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant portion of C-COR. Further, there are only limited exceptions to C-COR’s agreement that the C-COR board of directors will not withdraw, modify, or qualify in any manner adverse to ARRIS its approval of the merger agreement or its recommendation to holders of C-COR common stock that they vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement, or recommend any other acquisition proposal. Although the C-COR board of directors is permitted to take these actions if it determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law in connection with a superior proposal, doing so in specified situations could entitle ARRIS to terminate the merger agreement and to be paid by C-COR a termination fee of $22.5 million in cash.

Similarly, in the event a third party makes a proposal to acquire all or a significant portion of ARRIS, and the merger agreement is terminated and ARRIS completes the third-party transaction within 12 months of the termination of the merger agreement, ARRIS could be required to pay C-COR a termination fee of $22.5 million in cash.

ARRIS and C-COR agreed to these restrictions to induce the other party to enter into the merger agreement. However, these provisions could discourage a potential third-party acquiror that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of either C-COR or ARRIS from considering or proposing that acquisition, or might result in a potential acquiror proposing to pay a lower per share price to acquire either C-COR or ARRIS than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added cost of the termination fee that may become payable to either ARRIS or C-COR in certain circumstances.

ARRIS’ and C-COR’s stockholders will be diluted by the merger.

The merger will dilute the ownership position of the current shareholders of ARRIS. ARRIS will issue approximately 25 million shares of ARRIS common stock (based on the number of outstanding shares of C-COR common stock on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and assuming the exercise of all outstanding options to purchase shares of C-COR common stock) to C-COR shareholders in the merger. As a result, ARRIS’ shareholders and C-COR’s shareholders are expected to hold approximately 81% and 19%, respectively, of the combined company’s common stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis (including shares issuable pursuant to outstanding options and convertible securities) immediately following the completion of the merger.

Any delay in completing the merger may reduce or eliminate the benefits expected.

In addition to the required shareholder approvals and regulatory clearances and approvals, the merger is subject to a number of other conditions beyond the control of ARRIS and C-COR that may prevent, delay, or otherwise materially adversely affect its completion. We cannot predict whether and when these other conditions will be satisfied. Further, the requirements for obtaining the required clearances and approvals could delay the completion of the merger for a period of time or prevent it from occurring. Any delay in completing the merger could cause ARRIS not to realize some of the benefits that ARRIS expects to achieve following the merger if it successfully completes the merger within its expected timeframe and integrates C-COR’s business.

The rights of C-COR shareholders will change when they become shareholders of ARRIS upon completion of the merger.

Upon completion of the merger, C-COR shareholders who receive ARRIS shares in the merger will become ARRIS shareholders. There are numerous differences between the rights of a shareholder of C-COR, a Pennsylvania corporation, and the rights of a shareholder of ARRIS, a Delaware corporation.

The costs and expenses incurred in connection with the integration of ARRIS’ and C-COR’s businesses may affect the combined company’s operating results.

The combined company will incur certain costs and expenses in connection with the integration of ARRIS’ and C-COR’s businesses. These costs and expenses will have a negative effect on the combined company’s results of operations.

Item 6.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are included herein:

(10)(1)		Letter of separation between C-COR Incorporated and David E. Levitan dated February 20, 2007
(2)(1)		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 23, 2007 by and among ARRIS Group, Inc, C-COR Corporation, and Air Merger Subsidiary Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2007)
(10)(1)		Profit Incentive Plan (PIP)-Fiscal Year 2008 (Amended and Restated as of October 23, 2007)
(10)(2)		Third Amendment to Revolving Line of Credit Agreement
(10)(3)		Amendment No 1. to the Rights Agreement between C-COR Incorporated and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co., dated as of September 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on Sept 23, 2007)
(10)(4)		Amendment No. 2 to the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated September 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2007)
(10)(5)		Amendment No 2007-1 to the Amended and Restated Incentive Plan executed October 11, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 12, 2007)
(15)		Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.
(31)(1)		Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
(31)(2)		Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(32)(1)		Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(32)(2)		Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

3227

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

				C-COR Incorporated (Registrant)
Date: May 9, 2007				/s/ DAVID A. WOODLE
Date: November 6, 2007				/s/ DAVID A. WOODLE
				Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 9, 2007				/s/ WILLIAM T. HANELLY
Date: November 6, 2007				/s/ WILLIAM T. HANELLY
				Chief Financial Officer
				(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: May 9, 2007				/s/ JOSEPH E. ZAVACKY
Date: November 6, 2007				/s/ JOSEPH E. ZAVACKY
				Controller & Assistant Secretary
				(Principal Accounting Officer)

3328

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · C-COR INC