UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2005~~2006

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File number: 333-74176

THE PRICE FUND I, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Delaware		36-4400372
(State of Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)
c/o Price Asset Management, Inc. 141 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 1340A Chicago, Illinois		60604
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

c/o Price Asset Management, Inc.

141 West Jackson Boulevard

Suite 1340A


Chicago, Illinois		60604
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(312) 264-4300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

Total number of Pages: 18 plus exhibits

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements of The Price Fund I, L.P. are included in Item 1:

		Page
Financial Statements
Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004		3
Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005		3
Schedules of Investments as of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004		4-5
Schedules of Investments as of September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005		4-5
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and March 31, 2004 (unaudited)		6
Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (unaudited)		6
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and March 31, 2004 (unaudited)		7
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (unaudited)		7
Financial Highlights for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and March 31, 2004 (unaudited)		8
Financial Highlights for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (unaudited)		8
Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)		9-11
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)		9-11

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition as of ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2005~~2006 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2004~~ 2005

	3/31/2005		12/31/2004
	9/30/2006		12/31/2005
ASSETS
Cash at bank	$	10,097	$	427,976
Cash and cash equivalents	$	149,575	$	12,961
Cash at broker		~~167~~310,~~235~~280		~~227~~410,~~010~~859
Investments in US Government obligations		1,445,308		996,015
Investment in US Government obligations		1,045,672		1,494,091
Unrealized net trading gains on open futures contracts		15,523		1,010
Net unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts		86,574		9,001
Due from General Partner		3,197		3,905
Accounts receivable – General Partner		4,394		8,986
Total Assets	$	1,641,360	$	1,655,916
Interest receivable		9,032		—
Total Assets	$	1,605,527	$	1,935,898
LIABILITIES
Management fees payable	$	4,550		7,720
Management and incentive fees payable	$	8,667	$	5,286
Administrative fees payable		5550,~~868~~942		3681,~~246~~947
Subscriptions received in advance		4,825		58,174
Redemptions payable		72,045		20,000
Redemptions payable		27,391
Subscriptions received in advance		—		323,687
Other		~~646~~5,599		~~831~~761
Total Liabilities		93137,~~280~~253		~~102~~431,~~971~~681
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Partners’ capital
Limited partners		1,262,699		1,259,832
Limited Partners		1,025,172		1,214,366
General Partner		~~285~~443,~~381~~102		~~293~~289,~~113~~851
Total Partners’ Capital		1,~~548~~468,~~080~~274		1,~~552~~504,~~945~~217
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital	$	1,~~641~~605,~~360~~527	$	1,~~655~~935,~~916~~898

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Schedule of Investments as of ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2005~~2006 (unaudited)

	Market Value		Percent ~~of Partners~~ofPartners’ Capital
US Government obligations:
US Government obligations (total cost - $1,045,173)
total cost - $1,440,794
Federal Home Loan Bank Notes, at 5.40%, due 1/29/2007, principal amount $500,000	$	500,155	34.06	%
US Treasury Bill, due 5/12/05,Principal amount $1,000,000	$	997,056	64.41	%
US Treasury Notes, at 3.75%, due 3/31/2007, principal amount $99,000		98,377	6.70	%
US Treasury Bill, due 5/26/05,Principal amount $450,000	$	448,252	28.96	%
Federal Home Loan Bank Notes, at 4.63% due 7/18/2007, principal amount $250,000		248,828	16.95	%
Total	$	1,445,308	93.37	%
Federal Mortgage Association Notes, at 4.25% due 9/15/2007 principal amount $200,000		198,312	13.51	%
Total	$	1,045,672	71.22	%

Open Futures Contracts:

	Number of Contracts	Market Value		Percent of Partners’ Capital
Unrealized gains (100% US based)
Unrealized gains (84.64% US based)
Currencies	3	$	2,335	0.15	%
Agricultural	29	$	48,233	3.28	%
Financials	20		13,188	0.85	%
Currencies	9		2,320	0.16	%
Net unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts	23	$	15,523	1.00	%
Energy	3		4,504	0.31	%
Financials	56		45,684	3.11	%
Indexes	2		2,946	0.20	%
	99	$	103,687	7.06	%
Unrealized losses (68.13% US based)
Agricultural	10	$	4,597	0.31	%
Currencies	9		3,821	0.26	%
Energy	5		4,010	0.27	%
Financials	22		2,968	0.20	%
Indexes	5		1,717	0.12	%
Total	51	$	17,113	1.16	%
Net unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts		$	86,574	5.90	%

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Schedule of Investments as of December 31, ~~2004~~2005

	MarketValue		Percent of Partners’ Capital
	Market Value		Percent of Partners’ Capital
US Government obligations (total cost - $994,888)
US Government obligations (total cost - $1,481,130)
US Treasury Bills, due 2/10/05,Principal amount $1,000,000	$	996,015	64.14	%
US Treasury Bills, due 1/19/06, principal amount $500,000	$	499,013	33.17	%
US Treasury Bills, due 2/16/06, principal amount $1,000,000		995,078	66.15	%
Total	$	1,494,091	99.32	%

Open Futures Contracts:

	Number of Contracts	Market Value			Percent of Partners’ Capital	~~Percent of Partners’ Capital~~
Unrealized gains (77.85% US based)
Unrealized gains (100.00% US based)
Agricultural	83	$	~~100~~2,700		0.18	~~0.01~~%	%
Currencies	1213		2,~~372~~069		0.14	~~0.15~~%	%
Financials	13		1,219			0.08	%
Energy	1		63		0.00	%
	33	$	3,691			0.24	%
Financials	18		6,344		0.42	%
Unrealized losses (100.00% US based)
Metals	2		4,280		0.28	%
Agricultural	8	$	(1,900	)		0.12	%
	37	$	15,456		1.02	%
Financials	5		(781	)		0.05	%
Unrealized losses (66.66% US based)
Total	13	$	(2,681	)		0.17	%
Agricultural	1	$	250		0.02	%
Net unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts		$	1,010			0.07	%
Currencies	1		1,288		0.09	%
Energy	1		2,140		0.14	%
Metals	4		2,777		0.18	%
Total	7	$	6,455		0.43	%
Net unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts		$	9,001		0.59	%

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Statements of Operations for the Three Months ~~Ended~~and ~~March~~Nine ~~31,~~Months ~~2005~~Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2004~~ 2005 (unaudited)

	3 months ended 3/31/2005			3 months ended 3/31/2004
	3 monthsended9/30/2006			3 monthsended9/30/2005			9 monthsended9/30/2006			9 monthsended9/30/2005
Income:
Trading Income (Loss)
Trading income (loss)
Net trading gains (losses) - commodities
Net trading gains (losses) - commodities
Realized	$	(92,008	)	$	1,339		$	(87,571	)	$	166,851
Realized	$	(9,515	)	$	30,616
Change in unrealized		62,695			(9,210	)		77,573			26,665
Change in unrealized		14,513			33,486
Foreign exchange losses		(921	)		(2,362	)		(1,226	)		(9,979	)
Foreign exchange losses		(3,393	)		(225	)
Brokerage commissions		(7,072	)		(3,087	)		(21,905	)		(12,663	)
Commissions		(14,067	)		(8,539	)
Net trading income (loss)		(37,306	)		(13,320	)		(33,129	)		170,874
Total trading income (loss)		(12,462	)		55,338
Investment Income
Investment income
Interest		15,975			14,945			51,378			35,270
Interest		9,556			1,385
Expenses:
Expenses:
Management fees – General Partner		3,663			5,002			11,642			12,973
Management fees - General Partner		3,918			2,970
Management fees – Trading Advisors		4,337			6,261			13,453			16,511
Management fees - Trading Advisors		4,270			4,812
Incentive fees – Trading Advisors		3,331			893			18,303			37,313
Incentive fees - Trading Advisors		—			21,184
Trailing commissions		5,493			11,382			18,035			30,132
Professional fees		3154,~~470~~255			2930,~~110~~430			114,778			92,411
Bank fees and other expenses		—900			~~3,750~~600			2,700			600
Total expenses		39,658			61,826
Total expenses before reimbursement of expenses		71,979			54,568			178,911			189,940
Net investment loss		(30,102	)		(60,441	)
Less: reimbursement of expenses		—			—			—			(16,000	)
Net loss	$	(42,564	)	$	(5,103	)
Net expenses		71,979			54,568			178,911			173,940
Net investment loss		(56,004	)		(39,623	)		(127,533	)		(138,670	)
Net income (loss)	$	(93,310	)	$	(52,943	)	$	(160,662	)	$	32,204

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the ~~Three~~Nine Months Ended ~~March~~September 30, 312006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (unaudited)

and March 31, 2004 (unaudited)


	9 months ended 9/30/2006			9 months ended 9/30/2005
Partners’ capital at beginning of period	$	1,504,217		$	1,552,945
Contributions		321,880			510,758
Net income (loss)		(160,662	)		32,204
Withdrawals		(197,161	)		(82,771	)

Partners’ capital at end of period	$	1,468,274		$	2,013,136


Per unit data	9/30/2006			9/30/2005
Net asset value	$	873.66		$	1,003.38

Units outstanding		1,681			2,006

	3 months ended 3/31/05			3 months ended 3/31/04
Partners’ capital at beginning of period	$	1,552,945		$	521
Contributions		66,914			1,364,737
Net loss		(42,564	)		(5,103	)
Withdrawals		(29,215	)		—
Partners’ capital at end of period	$	1,548,080		$	1,360,155
Per unit data	03/31/05			03/31/04
Net asset value	$	956.05		$	990.86
Units outstanding		1,619			1,373

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Financial Highlights for the Three Months ~~Ended~~and ~~March~~Nine 31Months Ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 (unaudited) and ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2004~~ 2005 (unaudited)

~~Financial~~Per ~~highlights~~Unit ~~for~~Performance ~~the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 are as follows:~~

	2005			2004
	3 monthsended9/30/2006				3 monthsended9/30/2005			9 monthsended9/30/2006			9 monthsended9/30/2005
Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Partners’ Capital	(1.93	)%		(5.12	)%
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	928.62			$	1,030.10		$	971.03		$	981.95
Ratio of Expenses to Average Partners’ Capital	2.54	%		5.24	%
Income
Total Return	(2.64	)%		(0.91	)%
Trading gains and losses		(22.63	)			(5.78	)		(20.20	)		101.15
Investment Income
Interest		9.69				7.90			31.32			20.27
Expenses		(42.02	)			(28.84	)		(108.49	)		(99.99	)
Net investment loss		(32.33	)			(20.94	)		(77.17	)		(79.72	)
Net gain (loss) per Unit		(54.96	)			(26.72	)		(97.37	)		21.43
Net Asset Value per unit at the end of the period	$	873.66			$	1,003.38		$	873.66		$	1,003.38
	3 monthsended9/30/2006				3 monthsended9/30/2005			9 monthsended9/30/2006			9 monthsended9/30/2005
Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Partners’ Capital		-3.79	%			-2.05	%		-8.30	%		-8.04	%
Ratio of Expenses to Average Partners’ Capital		4.87	%			2.83	%		11.64	%		10.08	%
Total Return		-5.92	%			-2.59	%		-10.03	%		2.18	%

The above ratios have ~~not~~ been ~~annualized~~ ~~and were~~ calculated for the partners taken as a whole and have not been annualized. The computation of such ratios was not based on the amount of expenses assessed and income allocated to an individual partner’s capital account, which may vary from these ratios based on the timing of capital transactions.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations—The Price Fund I, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) (the “Partnership”) was organized on October 5, 2000 to engage in speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests, including futures, options on futures and forward contracts. The Partnership commenced trading activities on January 12, 2004.

Price Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of the Partnership (the “General Partner”), is registered as a commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor. The Price Futures Group, Inc., an entity affiliated through common ownership, acts as the introducing broker for the Partnership, whereby certain of the Partnership’s accounts are introduced to the Partnership’s clearing broker. Man Financial Inc. serves as the clearing broker.

The General Partner and each limited partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to their respective ownership interests.

Basis of presentation—The financial statements included herein were prepared by us without audit according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America may be omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary that were of a normal and recurring nature and adequate disclosures necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations as of and for the periods indicated. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and ~~2004~~2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or for any other period.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 ~~Registration Statement~~ as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Net~~Cash ~~Assets—The valuation of net assets includes unrealized gains~~ and ~~losses on open commodity futures and forward contracts owned by the~~cash ~~Partnership,~~equivalents—Cash ~~if any, at the end of the period. The unrealized gains~~ and ~~losses~~cash onequivalents ~~these~~consist ~~contracts have been calculated based on closing prices on the last business day~~ of ~~the~~cash ~~reporting~~in ~~period.~~banks ~~Gains~~ and ~~losses~~money ~~from~~market ~~translation~~instruments tothat ~~U.S.~~mature ~~dollars are included~~ in ~~trading~~90 ~~income~~days ~~(loss)~~or ~~on the Statement of Operations~~less. Foreign currency is translated into US dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the last business day of each month. Net asset value is determined by subtracting liabilities from assets, which also equals Partners’ capital.

~~Revenue Recognition~~Net Assets—~~Commodity~~The ~~futures~~valuation ~~contracts~~of ~~are~~net ~~recorded~~assets onincludes ~~the~~unrealized ~~trade~~gains ~~date,~~ and losses on open ~~positions~~commodity ~~are~~futures ~~reflected~~and inforward ~~the~~contracts ~~accompanying~~owned ~~statements~~by ofthe ~~financial~~Partnership, ~~condition~~if asany, at the ~~difference~~end ~~between~~of the ~~original~~reporting ~~contract~~period. ~~value~~The unrealized gains and ~~the~~losses ~~market~~on these ~~value~~contracts have been calculated based on closing prices on the last business day of ~~the~~each ~~reporting period~~month. ~~The~~Gains ~~market~~and ~~value~~losses offrom ~~the~~translation ~~commodity~~to ~~futures~~U.S. isdollars ~~based~~are ~~upon~~included ~~the~~in ~~most~~trading ~~recent~~income ~~available~~(loss) ~~settlement prices~~ on the ~~appropriate~~statements ~~commodity~~of ~~exchanges~~operations. ~~Changes~~Foreign incurrency ~~unrealized~~is translated ~~gains~~into orU.S. ~~(losses)~~dollars ~~represent~~at the ~~total increases~~exchange orrate ~~(decreases)~~prevailing inon ~~unrealized~~the ~~gains~~last orbusiness ~~(increases)~~day orof ~~decreases~~each inreporting ~~unrealized~~period. ~~losses~~Net onasset ~~open~~value ~~positions~~is ~~during~~determined ~~the~~by ~~period~~subtracting liabilities from assets, which also equals partners’ capital.

~~Interest~~Revenue ~~Income~~ Recognition—~~The~~Commodity ~~Partnership~~futures ~~records~~contracts ~~interest~~are ~~income~~recorded on the trade date, and open positions are reflected in the accompanying statements of financial condition as the difference between the original contract value and the market value on the last business day of the reporting period. itThe market value of the commodity futures contracts is ~~earned~~based upon the most recent available settlement prices on the appropriate commodity exchanges. Changes in unrealized gains or losses represent the total increases or decreases in unrealized gains or increases or decreases in unrealized losses on open positions during the period.

Income Taxes—The Partnership is not subject to federal income taxes because its income and losses are includable in the tax returns of its partners.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)

Interest Income Recognition—The Partnership records interest income in the period it is earned.

Income Taxes—The Partnership is not subject to federal income taxes because its income and losses are includable in the tax returns of its partners.

Note 2 The Limited Partnership Agreement and Related-Party Activities

The General Partner is responsible for management of the Partnership.

New limited partners may purchase units of the Partnership upon approval by the General Partner at the net asset value, as defined, as of the last day of each month or on any other date as determined by the General Partner. Such purchases are effective as of the beginning of the following month. The Partnership may sell up to 100,000 units.

After holding the units for nine months, limited partners may require the Partnership to redeem some or all of their units at the net asset value, as defined, as of the last day of each month without a redemption charge. Any units redeemed before the holder has been a limited partner for six months will be assessed a redemption charge equal to 3 percent of the net asset value per unit on the date of such redemption and units redeemed after six but within nine months will be assessed a 2 percent redemption charge.

The Partnership will terminate and its remaining net assets will be distributed pro rata to the holders of the then outstanding units on December 31, 2035, or earlier if certain events occur.

The Partnership pays management and other fees as specified in the ~~Form S-1~~ Registration Statement and offering documents. A summary of such fees payable to related entities is as follows:

Price Asset Management, Inc., as General Partner

The Partnership pays the General Partner a monthly management fee based on the Partnership’s total ~~net~~ assets, based on a 1 percent annual rate. ~~Management fees paid to the General Partner for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005, and 2004 determined at the 1 percent annual rate, amounted to $3,918 and $2,970, respectively.~~ The General Partner may choose one or more trading advisors that are responsible for making all trading decisions on behalf of the Partnership. The trading advisors, as selected by the General Partner and described in the Registration Statement, may charge the Partnership management fees up to 2 percent per annum (based on assets managed) and quarterly incentive fees of up to 20 percent of new trading profits, as defined. Effective January 1, 2006, the quarterly incentive fees earned by the trading advisors may be up to 30 percent of new trading profits dependent upon the agreement with each trading advisor.

The ~~General~~Partnership ~~Partner~~has ~~receives~~advanced aamounts ~~portion of the incentive fee assessed by certain advisors. However, this fee is payable by the advisors~~ to the General Partner ~~and~~for issales ~~not~~fees andue ~~obligation~~relating ofto orunits ~~payable by the Partnership~~sold. ~~Incentive~~The ~~fees~~balance ~~paid~~owed ~~by the advisors~~ to the ~~General~~Partnership ~~Partner~~as ~~for~~of September 30, ~~the~~2006 ~~three~~and ~~month periods ended March~~ December 31, 2005 ~~and 2004~~ amounted to $04,394 and $18,~~120~~986, respectively.

The Partnership has advanced certain amounts on behalf of the General Partner. The balance owing to the Partnership as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 amounted to $3,197 and $3,905 respectively.

The Price Futures Group, Inc., as Introducing Broker

The clearing broker pays Price Futures Group a portion of the brokerage fee paid by the Partnership for clearing transactions.

In addition, the Partnership pays Price Futures Group 1 percent of the purchase price of each limited partnership unit sold for syndication costs incurred by Price Futures Group. ~~Amounts incurred for such costs to Price Futures Group for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 totaled $688 and $7,046, respectively.~~ These syndication costs, which are related to the issuance of limited partnership units, are charged to partners’ capital upon the issuance of such units.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)

Uhlmann Price Securities, LLC, as Selling Group Manager

Uhlmann Price Securities, LLC, a related party to the General Partner by reason of common management, acts as the selling group manager for the Partnership. The Partnership, through the General Partner, pays Uhlmann Price Securities a commission of 3.5% ~~percent~~ (which includes a re-allowance of up to 3% to other broker -dealers) of the purchase price of each unit sold. These commissions are charged to partners’ capital upon the issuance of such units. ~~Commissions paid by the Partnership to Uhlmann Price Securities for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 amounted to $7,652 and $27,207, respectively.~~ In addition, the Partnership pays a trailing commission to salespersons identified by Uhlmann Price Securities or to selling agents beginning ~~thirteen~~ twelve months after that unit has been outstanding. The trailing commission is equal to 3 percent of the net asset value of a unit. NoEffective January 1, 2006, the trailing commission for each unit sold was reduced to 2 percent of the net asset value of the unit. No trailing commission will accrue or be paid for any unit that has been outstanding for less than one full year. As of ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2006 and 2005, 1,~~294~~258 ~~units~~and ~~qualified~~1,460 ~~for~~units, ~~the trailing commission~~respectively, ~~thus~~qualified ~~the expense~~ for the ~~Partnership~~trailing ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $8,445 (three months ended March 31, 2004 — $0)~~commissions.

The Partnership pays all of its direct legal, accounting, filing, reporting and data processing expenses, incentive fees, management fees, brokerage fees and extraordinary expenses, subject to overall limitations on fees described in the Partnership’s limited partnership agreement. The General Partner will bear any fees in excess of these limitations.

A summary of fees incurred by the Partnership included:


	3 months ended 9/30/2006	3 months ended 9/30/2005	9 months ended 9/30/2006	9 months ended 9/30/2005
Management fees – General Partner	3,663	5,002	11,642	12,973
Management fees – Trading Advisors	4,337	6,261	13,453	16,511
Incentive fees – Trading Advisors	3,331	893	18,303	37,313
Selling commissions – Uhlmann Price Securities	3,500	3,405	8,222	5,223
Trailing commissions – Uhlmann Price Securities	5,414	11,382	17,933	30,132

Note 3 Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

The Partnership’s trading ~~activities~~ ~~involve~~involves ~~derivative~~activities ~~financial~~that ~~instruments, primarily futures, options on futures, and forward contracts, which~~ have market and/or credit risk.

Market Risk—Market risk arises primarily from changes in the market value of financial instruments. Theoretically, the Partnership’s exposure is equal to the notional value of futures contracts purchased and unlimited on such contracts sold short. As both a buyer and seller of options on futures, the Partnership pays or receives a premium at the outset and then bears the risk of unfavorable market variations underlying the option. The risk of loss for purchased options on futures is limited to the premiums paid; written or sold options on futures expose the Partnership to potentially unlimited liability. Cash and U.S. Government obligations at the clearing broker are available to satisfy margin requirements.

Exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships between financial instruments, and the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the financial instruments are traded. In many cases, the use of financial instruments may serve to modify or offset market risk associated with other transactions and, accordingly, may serve to decrease the Partnership’s overall exposure to market risk. The Partnership attempts to control its exposure to market risk through various analytical monitoring techniques.

Credit Risk—Credit risk arises primarily from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance is limited to the current cost to replace all contracts in which the Partnership has a gain. Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges.

Concentration of Credit Risk—Some of the Partnership’s trades are cleared through Price Futures Group’s clearing broker. In the event this counterparty does not fulfill its obligations, the Partnership may be exposed to risk. This risk of default depends in part on the creditworthiness of this counterparty. The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker.

The Price Fund I, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)

nonperformance is limited to the current cost to replace all contracts in which the Partnership has a gain. Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges.

Concentration of Credit Risk—Some of the Partnership’s trades are cleared through Price Futures Group’s clearing broker. In the event this counterparty does not fulfill its obligations, the Partnership may be exposed to risk. This risk of default depends in part on the creditworthiness of this counterparty. The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

The Partnership commenced the offering of units on August 1, 2003. The initial offering period ended on December 31, 2003 and the Partnership commenced operations in January 2004. The continuing offering period commenced at the termination of the initial offering period and is ongoing. For the period from commencement of the offering through ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2005~~2006, subscriptions totaling $12,~~716~~563,~~075~~749 had been accepted and redemptions over the same period totaled $53887,~~923~~075.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Partnership will raise additional capital only through the sale of units offered pursuant to the continuing offering and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowings. Due to the nature of the Partnership’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.

LIQUIDITY

Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. This may affect the Partnership’s ability to initiate new positions or close existing ones or may prevent it from having orders executed. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Partnership to substantial losses, which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Partnership may not be able to execute future trades at favorable prices if little trading in such contracts is taking place.

Trading in forward contracts introduces a possible further impact on liquidity. Because such contracts are executed “off exchange” between private parties, the amount of time required to offset or “unwind” these positions may be greater than that for regulated instruments. This potential delay could be exacerbated to the extent a counterparty is not a United States person.

Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Partnership’s futures trading operations, the Partnership’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Partnership Results for January ~~2005~~2006:

The Partnership was unprofitable in January with the majority of losses occurring inwithin the ~~grains~~sectors ~~and~~of ~~grain~~energy ~~complex~~and currency. Positions in ~~soybeans~~gold, ~~soybean~~the ~~meal~~Eurodollar, and ~~corn~~ ~~generated~~coffee ~~losses~~were ~~which~~profitable. ~~were~~The gains, however could not offset ~~partially~~the bylosses ~~gains~~suffered in ~~the~~energy, currency, wheat, ~~market~~and corn.

InFor ~~the financial markets~~January, ~~losses occurred in Eurodollars and Treasury Bonds following news releases by~~ the ~~Federal~~Partnership ~~Reserve~~lost ~~Board~~2. ~~Currency positions produced mixed results after an abrupt rally in the U~~29%.S. ~~Dollar.~~

~~For~~Partnership ~~January,~~Results ~~the~~for ~~Partnership~~February ~~lost~~2006: ~~2.73%.~~

12Partnership performance in February remained consistent with that of January. Significant losses were experienced in the currency sector and the energy sector. Above normal temperatures and higher inventories dropped the prices of heating oil and crude oil futures contracts. Meanwhile, Partnership positions in metal contracts experienced losses as the Federal Reserve appointed a new Chairman who is committed to contracting the projected US Inflation.

~~Partnership~~For ~~Results~~the ~~for~~month, ~~February~~the ~~2005:~~Partnership lost 3.01%.

Partnership ~~performance~~Results ~~was~~for ~~essentially~~March ~~unchanged~~2006: in February, despite dramatic price reversals in certain markets. The Partnership was strongly non-correlated with traditional securities portfolio benchmarks and avoided significant impact from a series of global events, including news that South Korea was planning to diversify its currency holdings, new high prices in crude oil futures and a CPI report that failed to confirm inflationary concerns.

~~For~~Profits experienced in March are attributable to improving economic growth which translated to rising commodity prices and interest rates. U.S. interest rates increased as the ~~month~~Federal Reserve continued to tighten rates. Additional gains were achieved in metals as most positions reached twenty-year highs. The Partnership had unprofitable trades in meats, grains, and softs despite the ~~Partnership~~high ~~lost~~returns 0of frozen orange juice contracts.~~37%~~ Losses were also experienced in the energy and currency sectors.

~~Partnership~~For ~~Results~~March, ~~for~~the ~~March~~Partnership ~~2005:~~gained 3.86%.

~~Profits~~For inthe ~~fixed~~first ~~income~~quarter ~~and~~ended ~~crude oil positions offset small losses in foreign currencies. U.S. economic reports pushed interest rates higher~~March 31, ~~producing~~ the ~~largest~~Partnership’s ~~returns~~compounded ~~for~~rate ~~the~~of ~~month.~~return ~~Gains~~was ~~in long crude oil positions helped mitigate losses in Euro, British Pound and Australian Dollar positions resulting from volatility in the U~~-1.S57%. ~~Dollar.~~

~~For~~Partnership ~~March,~~Results ~~the~~for ~~partnership~~April ~~gained~~2006: ~~0.47%.~~

~~For~~Profits ~~the~~in ~~year~~April ~~through~~were similar to those of March. ~~31,~~Strong ~~2005~~gains ~~the~~were ~~Partnership’s~~achieved ~~compounded~~in interest rate ~~of return~~contracts, ~~was~~indexes, -2currencies, and metals while the agricultural commodities declined.~~64%.~~

For April, the Partnership gained 4.37%.

Partnership Results for May 2006:

The profits experienced in the previous months turned to losses in May as the Partnership experienced its first loss since February. As the Federal Reserve continued to increase interest rates, stock indexes dropped considerably as the market was negatively affected by the increased rates. Furthermore, metals that reached all-time highs in February pulled back in May.

For May, the Partnership lost 0.75%.

Partnership Results for June 2006:

In June, commodity markets did not rally after the May 2006 losses. Instead, markets continued to fall as the Federal Reserve once again increased interest rates. As a majority of Price Fund I’s trading advisors are trend followers, the market’s continued downward slide negatively affected the Partnership’s performance.

For June, the Partnership lost 6.21%.

For the second quarter ended June 30, the Partnership’s compounded rate of return was -2.84%.

Partnership Results for July 2006:

Commodity markets continued to remain volatile in July. The driving forces behind these markets appeared to be continued violence in the Middle East, investor indecision over whether the Federal Reserve policy makers would continue to raise short-term interest rates, and volatility in the agricultural and energy markets stemming from the beginning of hurricane season and severe summer heat.

For July, the Partnership lost 4.96%.

Partnership Results for August 2006:

The month of August was slow and uneventful in the commodity markets. The Fund profited from movements in currencies, grains and soft commodities while positions in metals, equity indexes and lumber posted modest losses. Overall, the Fund posted its first monthly gain since April.

For August, the Partnership gained 2.51%.

Partnership Results for September 2006:

The month of September continued the downturn of the Fund as investors took positions which indicated their apparent belief that the commodity markets were inflated. Positions in most markets were mixed. Correlations between the individual commodities in the same market sectors were low.

For September, the Partnership lost 3.43%.

For the third quarter and nine-months ended September 30, 2006, the Partnership lost 5.92% and 10.03%, respectively.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Partnership ~~intends~~trades ~~to trade~~ in futures and forward contracts and may therefore become a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Partnership at the same time, and if ~~Price~~the ~~Asset~~General ~~Management~~Partner was unable to offset such positions, the Partnership could experience substantial losses. Price Asset Management will access daily positions and profit and loss summaries for all trading advisors selected to trade Partnership assets and will employ various measures to monitor draw-downs, market diversification and leverage.

In addition to market risk, in entering into futures and forward contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Partnership. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES – VALUATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP’S POSITIONS

~~Price~~The ~~Asset~~General ~~Management~~Partner believes that the accounting policies that will be most critical to the Partnership’s financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Partnership’s positions. The majority of the Partnership’s positions are exchange-traded futures contracts, which are valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges. ~~Any spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Partnership are also valued at published daily settlement prices~~ or at ~~dealers’~~ dealer quotes. Thus, ~~Price~~the ~~Asset~~General ~~Management~~Partner expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are valued on a daily basis using objective measures.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

INTRODUCTION

Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Performance

The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or a substantial amount of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s main line of business.

Market movements can produce frequent changes in the fair market value of the Partnership’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnership’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of exchange rates, interest rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Partnership may rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets through the allocations it makes to trading advisors. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of this, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification included in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership’s attempts to manage its market risk.

Standard of Materiality

Materiality as used in this section, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, and multiplier features of the Partnership’s market sensitive instruments.

QUANTIFYING THE PARTNERSHIP’S TRADING VALUE AT RISK

Quantitative Forward-Looking Statements

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact (such as the dollar amount of maintenance margin required for market risk sensitive instruments held at the end of the reporting period).

The Partnership’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Partnership is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to the Partnership’s mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings (realized or unrealized).

Exchange maintenance margin requirements are expected to be used by the Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day intervals. The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day intervals. The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

In the case of market sensitive instruments which are not exchange-traded (which includes currencies and some energy products and metals in the case of the Partnership), the margin requirements for the equivalent futures positions have been used as Value at Risk. In those cases in which a futures-equivalent margin is not available, dealers’ margins have been used.

In the case of contracts denominated in foreign currencies, the Value at Risk figures include foreign margin amounts converted into U.S. Dollars with an incremental adjustment to reflect the exchange rate risk inherent to the Dollar-based Partnership in expressing Value at Risk in a functional currency other than Dollars.

In quantifying the Partnership’s Value at Risk, 100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have simply been aggregated to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Partnership’s positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated have not been taken into account.

THE PARTNERSHIP’S TRADING VALUE AT RISK IN DIFFERENT MARKET SECTORS

The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of ~~March 31~~September 30, ~~2005~~2006.

Market Sector	Value at Risk		Percent of Net Assets
Currencies	$	2,335	0.15	%
Agricultural	$	52,829	3.60	%
Financials	$	13,188	0.85	%
Currencies	$	6,141	0.42	%
TOTAL:	$	15,523	1.00	%
Energy	$	8,514	0.58	%
Financials	$	48,652	3.31	%
Indexes	$	4,663	0.32	%
TOTAL:	$	120,799	8.23	%

MATERIAL LIMITATIONS ON VALUE AT RISK AS AN ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership may typically be many times the applicable maintenance margin requirement (maintenance margin requirements generally ranging between approximately 1% and 10% of contract face value) as well as many times the capitalization of the Partnership. The magnitude of the Partnership’s open positions could create a “risk of ruin” not typically found in most other investment vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions — unusual, but historically recurring from time to time — could cause the Partnership to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The Value at Risk tables — as well as the past performance of the Partnership — give no indication of this “risk of ruin.”

NON-TRADING RISK

The Partnership may experience non-trading market risk on any foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market risk they represent) are expected to be immaterial. The Partnership also may have non-trading market risk as a result of investing in U.S. Treasury Bills. The market risk represented by these investments is expected to be immaterial.

QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING PRIMARY TRADING RISK EXPOSURES

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by Price Asset Management for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

1517

could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING NON-TRADING RISK EXPOSURE

General

The Partnership is unaware of any (i) anticipated known demands, commitments or capital expenditures; (ii) material trends, favorable or unfavorable, in its capital resources; or (iii) trends or uncertainties that will have a material effect on operations. From time to time, certain regulatory agencies have proposed increased margin requirements on futures contracts. Because the Partnership generally will use a small percentage of assets as margin, the Partnership does not believe that any increase in margin requirements, as proposed, will have a material effect on the Partnership’s operations.

QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING MEANS OF MANAGING RISK EXPOSURE

The means by which the Partnership attempts to manage the risk of the Partnership’s open positions is essentially the same in all market categories traded. Price Asset Management applies risk management policies to trading which generally are designed to limit the total exposure that may be taken per “risk unit” of assets under management. In addition, Price Asset Management follows diversification guidelines (often formulated in terms of the balanced volatility between markets and correlated groups), as well as imposing “stop-loss” points for each of the Partnership’s trading advisors.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Price Asset Management have concluded that the Partnership has effective disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership is made known to them by others within the Partnership, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared. The principal executive officer and financial and principal accounting officer of Price Asset Management have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this report (the “Evaluation Date”) and have based the foregoing conclusion about the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

During the period covered by this report, there have been no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

1618

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings.
		None
Item 2.		Changes in Securities
		None
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities
		Not applicable.
Item 4.		Submissions of Matters to a vote of Security Holders.
		None
Item 5.		Other Information
		None
Item 6.		Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
		None

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

17None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There are no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Partnership’s most recently filed Form 10-K in response to Item 1A to Part 1 of said Form 10-K. See the Partnership’s responses to Item 3 of Part 1 of this Form 10-Q for a description of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks attendant to the operation of the Partnership.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

See attached Exhibit Index.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on ~~May 16~~November 13, ~~2005~~2006.

THE PRICE FUND I, L.P. (Registrant) By: Price Asset Management, Inc. General Partner By: /s/ Walter Thomas Price III Walter Thomas Price III Chairman, President and Director

1820

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description of Document	Page Number
ExhibitNumber	Description of Document	Page Number
31.01	Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-2
31.1	Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-2
31.02	Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-3
32.1	Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-3
32.01	Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-4
31.2	Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-4
32.02	Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-5
32.2	Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-5

E-1

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · PRICE FUND I LP