UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-25785

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		13-3985040
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
51 Weaver Street, Building 1 South, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, Connecticut		06831
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 861-1000


900 King Street, Suite 100, Rye Brook, New York		10573
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (914) 307-7000

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~Registrant~~registrant is ana large accelerated filer, ~~(as~~an ~~defined~~accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act. of(Check ~~1934~~one)~~. Yes ¨ No x~~:

~~PART~~Large I.accelerated ~~FINANCIAL~~filer ¨ Accelerated ~~INFORMATION~~filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (ad defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 24 30, ~~2005~~ 2006

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2004~~ ~~(Audited)~~2005

	June 24,2005		December 31,2004
	June 30,2006		December 31,2005
ASSETS
Cash in commodity trading accounts	$	1510,~~790~~368	$	1612,~~066~~331
Investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (100% of net asset value)		2,564,308		2,980,766
Investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (99.99% and 100.05% of net asset value, respectively)		1,784,720		2,160,971
Redemption receivable from WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.		892,~~374~~529		436,~~466~~120
Total assets	$	21,~~669~~797,~~472~~617	$	32,~~001~~209,~~298~~422
LIABILITIES
Commissions payable	$	1512,~~150~~679	$	1615,~~240~~954
Redemptions payable		49,026		0
Incentive fee payable		37		681
Total liabilities		64,176		16,240
Redemptions payable		0		32,903
Commitments
Total liabilities		12,716		49,538
Trust capital
Limited interests (29,618.758 and 36,398.946 interests outstanding) at June 24, 2005 and December 31, 2004		2,571,523		2,953,494
Limited interests (20,866.302 and 24,452.976 interests outstanding) at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005		1,766,614		2,137,420
Managing Owner interests (389 interests outstanding) at June 24, 2005 and December 31, 2004		33,773		31,564
Managing Owner interests (216 and 257 interests outstanding) at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005		18,287		22,464
Total trust capital		21,~~605~~784,~~296~~901		2,~~985~~159,~~058~~884
Total liabilities and trust capital	$	21,~~669~~797,~~472~~617	$	32,~~001~~209,~~298~~422

See accompanying notes.

-2-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Periods ~~March 26~~April 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 24 30, 2006 ~~2005~~ and ~~March~~ 27March 26, ~~2004~~2005 to June 25 24, ~~2004~~2005 and

~~For the Periods~~ January 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and January 1, ~~2004~~2005 to June 25 24, 2005 ~~2004~~

(Unaudited)

	For the PeriodMarch 26, 2005 toJune 24, 2005			For the PeriodMarch 27, 2004 toJune 25, 2004			For the PeriodJanuary 1, 2005 toJune 24, 2005			For the PeriodJanuary 1, 2004 toJune 25, 2004
	For the PeriodApril 1, 2006 toJune 30, 2006			For the PeriodMarch 26, 2005 toJune 24, 2005			For the PeriodJanuary 1, 2006 toJune 30, 2006			For the PeriodJanuary 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005
NET (LOSS) FROM TRUST OPERATIONS:
REVENUES
Realized	$	0		$	(489,625	)	$	0		$	(668,367	)
Interest income	$	59		$	86		$	127		$	169
Change in net unrealized		0			(360,151	)		0			(255,116	)
Interest income		86			13,992			169			28,628
Total revenues		86			(835,784	)		169			(894,855	)
EXPENSES
Commissions		4934,~~429~~668			8949,~~804~~429			9671,~~629~~673			~~190~~96,~~377~~629
Management fee		0			23,141			0			49,124
Incentive fee		37			0			7,291			0
Incentive fee		0			0			0			(8,750	)
Total expenses		34,705			49,429			78,964			96,629
Total expenses		49,429			112,945			96,629			230,751
NET (LOSS) FROM TRUST OPERATIONS		(34,646	)		(49,343	)		(78,837	)		(96,460	)
NET (LOSS) FROM TRUST OPERATIONS		(49,343	)		(948,729	)		(96,460	)		(1,125,606	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.:
NET INCOME ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.:
REVENUES
Realized		~~158~~(35,~~116~~492	)		0158,116			25(71,~~305~~996	)		025,305
Change in net unrealized		~~242~~(69,~~390~~806	)		0242,390			~~257~~72,~~460~~666			0257,460
Interest income		1823,~~548~~159			018,548			3446,~~763~~006			034,763
Total revenues		~~419~~(82,~~054~~139	)		0419,054			~~317~~46,~~528~~676			0317,528
EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions and other transaction fees		21,~~947~~354			02,947			63,~~819~~115			06,819
Management fee		149,~~025~~303			014,025			2719,~~197~~308			027,197
Incentive fee		~~21,377~~0			021,377			~~21,377~~0			021,377
Total expenses		3810,~~349~~657			038,349			5522,~~393~~423			055,393
NET INCOME ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.		380,705			0			262,135			0
NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.		(92,796	)		380,705			24,253			262,135
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	~~331~~(127,~~362~~442	)	$	~~(948~~331,~~729~~362	)	$	~~165~~(54,~~675~~584	)	$	(1165,~~125,606~~675	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIMITED AND MANAGING OWNER INTEREST
Net income (loss) per weighted average limited and Managing Owner interest	$	9(5.7596	)	$	~~(21~~9.6875	)	$	4(2.7146	)	$	~~(25~~4.3671	)
Weighted average number of limited and Managing Owner interests outstanding		3321,~~986~~374			4333,~~756~~986			3522,~~151~~170			4435,~~389~~151

See accompanying notes.

-3-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TRUST CAPITAL

For the ~~Period~~Periods January 1, ~~2005~~2006 to ~~June~~ 24June 30, ~~2005~~2006 and

~~For the Period~~ January 1, ~~2004~~2005 to June 25 24, ~~2004~~2005

(Unaudited)

	Interests			~~LimitedInterests~~	LimitedInterests			~~Managing OwnerInterests~~	Managing OwnerInterests			~~Total~~	Total
For the period January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005
For the period December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006
Trust capital at December 31, 2004	36,787.946			$	2,953,494			$	31,564			$	2,985,058
Trust capital at December 31, 2005		24,709.976			$	2,137,420			$	22,464			$	2,159,884
Net income for the period January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005					163,466				2,209				165,675
Net (loss) for the period January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006						(54,070	)			(514	)			(54,584	)
Redemptions	~~(6,780.188~~	)(3,627.674	)		~~(545,437~~	)(316,736	)		0	(3,663	)		~~(545,437~~	)(320,399	)
Trust capital at June 24, 2005	30,007.758			$	2,571,523			$	33,773			$	2,605,296
Trust capital at June 30, 2006		21,082.302			$	1,766,614			$	18,287			$	1,784,901
For the period January 1, 2004 to June 25, 2004
For the period December 31, 2004 to June 24, 2005
Trust capital at December 31, 2003	45,200.828			$	5,521,592			$	55,897			$	5,577,489
Trust capital at December 31, 2004		36,787.946			$	2,953,494			$	31,564			$	2,985,058
Net (loss) for the period January 1, 2004 to June 25, 2004					(1,114,260	)			(11,346	)			(1,125,606	)
Net income for the period January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005						163,466				2,209				165,675
Redemptions	~~(2,746.943~~	)(6,780.188	)		~~(293,570~~	)(545,437	)		~~(2,952~~	)0			~~(296,522~~	)(545,437	)
Trust capital at June 25, 2004	42,453.885			$	4,113,762			$	41,599			$	4,155,361
Trust capital at June 24, 2005		30,007.758			$	2,571,523			$	33,773			$	2,605,296
	Net Asset Value per Limited and Managing Owner Interest
	June 30, 2006				December 31,2005				June 24, 2005				December 31,2004
	$	84.66			$	87.41			$	86.82			$	81.14

Net Asset Value per Limited and Managing Owner Interest
June 24,2005	December 31,2004		June 25,2004		December 31,2003
$86.82	$	81.14	$	97.88	$	123.39

See accompanying notes.

-4-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1.

ORGANIZATION

General Description of the Trust

The statement of financial condition as of June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006, and the statements of operations for the periods ~~March 26~~April 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 (“Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006”), March 27 26, ~~2004~~2005 to June 25 24, ~~2004~~2005 (“Second Quarter ~~2004~~ 2005”), January 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 (“Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006”), and January 1, ~~2004~~2005 to June 25 24, ~~2004,~~2005 (“Year-To-Date ~~2004~~2005”), and the statements of changes in trust capital for the periods January 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and January 1, ~~2004~~2005 to June 25 24, ~~2004~~2005, are unaudited. The December 31, 2005 references were taken from audited financial statements. In the opinion of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (“Preferred” or the “Managing Owner”), the financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to state fairly the financial position of World Monitor Trust – Series A (“Series A”) as of June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and the results of its operations for the Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006, Second Quarter ~~2004~~2005, Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006 and Year-To-Date ~~2004~~2005. ~~However,~~The ~~the~~ operating results for these interim periods may not be indicative of the results expected for a full year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Series A’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, ~~2004~~2005.

World Monitor Trust ~~– Series A~~ (the “Trust”) is a business trust organized under the laws of Delaware on December 17, 1997. The Trust commenced trading operations on June 10, 1998 and will terminate on December 31, 2047 unless terminated sooner as provided in the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement. The Trust consists of three separate and distinct series (“Series”): Series A, B and C. The assets of each Series are segregated from those of the other Series, separately valued and independently managed. Each Series was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures, forward and options contracts and may, from time to time, engage in cash and spot transactions. The trustee of the Trust is Wilmington Trust Company.

OnEffective ~~July 1~~December 6, ~~2003~~2004, ~~Prudential~~Series ~~Financial,~~A ~~Inc.~~contributed ~~(“Prudential”)~~its ~~and~~net ~~Wachovia~~assets to ~~Corp~~WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “~~Wachovia~~Company”) ~~combined their separate retail securities brokerage~~ and ~~clearing~~received ~~businesses under~~ a ~~new~~Voting ~~holding~~Membership ~~company~~Interest ~~named~~in ~~Wachovia/Prudential~~the ~~Financial~~Company. ~~Advisors,~~The ~~LLC~~Company ~~(“WPFA”),~~was ~~owned~~formed ~~62%~~to byfunction ~~Wachovia~~as ~~and~~an ~~38%~~aggregate bytrading ~~Prudential~~vehicle. AsThe asole ~~result,~~members of the ~~retail~~Company ~~brokerage operations~~are ofSeries ~~Prudential~~A ~~Securities~~and ~~Incorporated~~World ~~(“PSI”)~~Monitor ~~were~~Trust II ~~contributed~~– toSeries ~~Wachovia~~F ~~Securities, LLC~~ (“~~Wachovia~~Series ~~Securities~~F”). ~~Wachovia~~Preferred ~~Securities~~ is ~~wholly-owned~~the byManaging ~~WPFA~~Owner ~~and~~of isSeries aF ~~registered~~and ~~broker-dealer~~has ~~and~~been adelegated ~~member~~administrative ofauthority over the ~~National~~ ~~Association~~operations of ~~Securities~~the ~~Dealers, Inc~~Company. ~~(“NASD”)~~The ~~and~~Company ~~all~~engages ~~major~~in ~~securities~~the ~~exchanges.~~speculative ~~Series~~trading Aof futures and ~~its~~forward contracts. ~~Managing~~The ~~Owner,~~financial ~~Prudential~~statements ~~Securities~~of ~~Futures~~the ~~Management~~Company, ~~Inc.,~~including ~~which~~the ~~was~~condensed anschedule ~~indirect wholly-owned subsidiary~~ of ~~PSI~~investments, ~~entered into~~are aincluded ~~service~~in ~~agreement~~Section ~~with~~II ~~Wachovia~~of ~~Securities,~~these ~~effective~~financial ~~July~~statements 1,and ~~2003.~~should ~~Pursuant~~be toread ~~this~~in ~~agreement,~~conjunction ~~Wachovia~~with ~~Securities~~Series ~~agreed~~A’s tofinancial ~~provide certain enumerated services to accounts of the limited interest owners carried at Wachovia~~statements.

Note 2.

RELATED PARTIES

The Managing Owner or third parties engaged by the Managing Owner perform services for Series A, which include, but are not limited to: brokerage services; accounting and financial management; registrar, transfer and assignment functions; investor communications, printing and other administrative services. Except for costs related to brokerage services, Preferred pays all the costs of these services in addition to Series A’s routine operational, administrative, legal and auditing costs.

-5-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 12. ~~ORGANIZATION~~RELATED PARTIES (CONTINUED)

The costs charged to Series A. ~~General~~for ~~Description~~commissions offor the ~~Trust~~Second ~~(continued)~~Quarter 2006, Second Quarter 2005, Year-To-Date 2006 and Year-To-Date 2005 were $34,668, $49,429, $71,673 and $96,629, respectively.

Effective July 1, 2003, PSI changed its name to Prudential Equity Group, Inc. (“PEG”). PEG remained an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential. PEG was a registered broker-dealer and a member of the NASD and all major securities exchanges and conducted the equity research, domestic and international equity sales and trading operations, and commodity brokerage and derivative operations it had previously conducted as PSI until December 31, 2003. As part of the process of reorganizing its business structure, Prudential Securities Group Inc. (“PSG”), the direct parent of PEG and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential, transferred the commodity brokerage, commodity clearing and derivative operations previously performed by PEG to another PSG indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Prudential Financial Derivatives, LLC (“PFD”) effective January 1, 2004. Like PEG, PFD is registered as a futures commission merchant under the Commodity Exchange Act and is a member of the National Futures Association. On April 1, 2004, PEG transferred the ownership of the Managing Owner and PFD Holdings, LLC, the direct parent of PFD to PSG.

On June 30, 2004, PSG and Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., formerly Kenmar Advisory Corp. (“Preferred”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which PSG would sell, and Preferred would buy, all of the capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the then current Managing Owner of Series A) and another commodity pool operator owned by PSG. In connection with the transaction, Prudential Securities Futures Management, Inc. solicited proxies seeking approval from the Series A interest holders for (i) the sale of the stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management, Inc. to Preferred; (ii) the concomitant approval of Preferred as the new Managing Owner of Series A; and (iii) the concomitant approval of certain amendments to the Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement of the Trust. A Report on Form 8-K describing the transaction was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2004 and the definitive proxies were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2004.

As of October 1, 2004, Preferred acquired from PSG all of the outstanding stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. Immediately after such acquisition, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. was merged with and into Preferred. Accordingly, as of October 1, 2004 all of the board of directors and officers of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. resigned. Following Preferred’s acquisition of Prudential Securities Futures Management, Inc. and its merger with and into Preferred, Preferred became the successor Managing Owner of Series A.

The term Managing Owner, as used herein, refers either to Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. or Preferred, depending upon the applicable period discussed.

Effective December 6, 2004, Series A contributed its net assets to WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) and received a Voting Membership Interest in the Company. The Company was formed to function as an aggregate trading vehicle. The sole members of the Company are Series A and World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”). Preferred is the Managing Owner of Series F and has been delegated administrative authority over the operations of the Company. The Company engages in the speculative trading of futures and forward contracts. The financial statements of the Company, including the condensed schedule of investments, are included in Section II of these financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Series A’s financial statements.

-6-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 2. RELATED PARTIES

The Managing Owner or third parties engaged by the Managing Owner perform services for Series A, which include, but are not limited to: brokerage services; accounting and financial management; registrar, transfer and assignment functions: investor communications, printing and other administrative services. Except for costs related to brokerage services, PEG, or its affiliates, or Preferred pay all the costs of these services in addition to Series A’s routine operational, administrative, legal and auditing costs. Additionally, PEG or its affiliates paid the costs associated with offering Series A’s Interests.

The costs charged to Series A for brokerage services for the Second Quarter 2005, Second Quarter 2004, Year-To-Date 2005 and Year-To-Date 2004 were $49,429, $89,804, $96,629 and $190,377, respectively.

All of the proceeds of the offering of Series A were received in the name of Series A and were deposited in trading or cash accounts at PEG. Effective January 1, 2004, Series A’s assets are maintained with PFD and PFD credits Series A monthly with 100% of the interest it earns on the average net assets in Series A’s accounts.

Series A, acting through its Trading Advisor, may execute over-the-counter, spot, forward and/or option foreign exchange transactions with its broker. The broker then engages in back-to-back trading with an affiliate, Prudential-Bache Global Markets Inc. (“PBGM”). PBGM attempts to earn a profit on such transactions.

PBGM keeps its prices on foreign currency competitive with other interbank currency trading desks. Prior to December 6, 2004 all over-the-counter currency transactions were conducted between Series A and its broker pursuant to a line of credit.

Note 3.

INVESTMENT IN WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

~~Effective December 6, 2004,~~ Series ~~A invested a substantial portion of its assets in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the~~ ~~“Company”). Series~~ A’s investment in the Company represents approximately 5% and 6%, respectively, of the net asset value of the Company at June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and December 31, ~~2004~~2005. The investment in the Company is subject to the Organization Agreement of ~~the~~ the Company.

Summarized information for this investment is as follows:

Net Asset ValueDecember 31, 2004

Income

Redemptions

Net Asset ValueJune 24, 2005

Net Asset ValueDecember 31, 2005

Gain

Redemptions

Net Asset ValueJune 30, 2006

WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

2,~~980~~160,~~766~~971

~~262~~24,~~135~~253

(~~678~~400,~~593~~504

)

21,~~564~~784,~~308~~720

Series A may make additional contributions to, or redemptions from, the Company on a weekly basis.

-7-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 4.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS

Series A is exposed to various types of risks associated with the derivative instruments and related markets through its investment in the Company. These risks include, but are not limited to, risk of loss from fluctuations in the value of derivative instruments held (market risk) and the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the Company’s investment activities (credit risk).

Market Risk

Trading in futures and forward contracts (including foreign exchange) involves entering into contractual commitments to purchase or sell a particular commodity at a specified date and price. The gross or face amount of the contracts, which is typically many times that of the Company’s net assets being traded, significantly exceeds the Company’s future cash requirements since the Company intends to close out its open positions prior to settlement. As a result, the Company is generally subject only to the risk of loss arising from the change in the value of the contracts. As such, the Company considers the “fair value” of its derivative instruments to be the net unrealized gain or loss on the contracts. The market risk associated with the Company’s commitments to purchase commodities is limited to the gross or face amount of the contract held. However, when the Company enters into a contractual commitment to sell commodities, it must make delivery of the underlying commodity at the contract price and then repurchase the contract at prevailing market prices or settle in cash. Since the repurchase price to which a commodity can rise is unlimited, entering into commitments to sell commodities exposes the Company to unlimited risk.

-6-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 4.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS

Market Risk (Continued)

Market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including government programs and policies, political and economic events, the level and volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, the diversification effect among the derivative instruments the Company holds and the liquidity and inherent volatility of the markets in which the Company trades.

Credit Risk

When entering into futures or forward contracts, the Company is exposed to credit risk that the counterparty to the contract will not meet its obligations. The counterparty for futures contracts traded on United States and most foreign futures exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with the particular exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by their corporate members who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members (i.e., some foreign exchanges), it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. On the other hand, there is a concentration risk on forward transactions entered into by the Company as the Company’s commodity broker is the sole counterparty. The Company has entered into a master netting agreement with its broker and, as a result, when applicable, presents unrealized gains and losses on open forward positions as a net amount in the statements of financial condition. The amount at risk associated with counterparty non-performance of all of the Company’s contracts is the net unrealized gain included in the statements of financial condition; however, counterparty non-performance on only certain of the Company’s contracts may result in greater loss than non-performance on all of the Company’s contracts. There can be no assurance that any counterparty, clearing member or clearinghouse will meet its obligations to the Company.

~~-8-~~The Managing Owner attempts to minimize both credit and market risks by requiring the Trading Advisor of the Company to abide by various trading limitations and policies. The Managing Owner monitors compliance with these trading limitations and policies, which include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing all trades with creditworthy counterparties; limiting the amount of margin or premium required for any one commodity or all commodities combined; and generally limiting transactions to contracts which are traded in sufficient volume to permit the taking and liquidating of positions. Additionally, pursuant to the advisory agreement among the Company, Preferred and the Trading Advisor, Preferred shall automatically terminate the Company’s Trading Advisor Agreement if the net asset value allocated to the Trading Advisor declines by 40% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the effective date of the Trading Advisory Agreement. Furthermore, the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement provides that Series A will liquidate its positions, and eventually dissolve, if Series A experiences a decline in net asset value of 50% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the commencement of trading activities. In each case, the decline in net asset value is after giving effect for distributions, contributions and redemptions. The Managing Owner may impose additional restrictions (through modifications of trading limitations and policies) upon the trading activities of the Trading Advisor as it, in good faith, deems to be in the best interest of Series A.

-7-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 4.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS (CONTINUED)

~~The~~Credit ~~Managing~~Risk Owner attempts to minimize both credit and market risks by requiring the Trading Advisor of the Company to abide by various trading limitations and policies. The Managing Owner monitors compliance with these trading limitations and policies, which include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing all trades with creditworthy counterparties; limiting the amount of margin or premium required for any one commodity or all commodity or all commodities combined; and generally limiting transactions to contracts which are traded in sufficient volume to permit the taking and liquidating of positions. Additionally, pursuant to the advisory agreement among the Company, Preferred and the Trading Advisor, Preferred shall automatically terminate the Company’s trading agreement if the net asset value allocated to the trading advisor declines by 40% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the effective date of the advisory agreement (~~i.e., December 2004~~Continued). Furthermore, the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement provides that Series A will liquidate its positions, and eventually dissolve, if Series A experiences a decline in net asset value of 50% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the commencement of trading activities. In each case, the decline in net asset value is after giving effect for distributions, contributions and redemptions. The Managing Owner may impose additional restrictions (through modifications of trading limitations and policies) upon the trading activities of the Trading Advisor as it, in good faith, deems to be in the best interest of Series A.

Series A’s futures commission merchant, Prudential Financial Derivatives, LLC, in accepting orders for the purchase or sale of domestic futures contracts, is required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to Series A all assets of Series A relating to domestic futures trading and is not allowed to commingle such assets with its other assets. At June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and December 31, ~~2004~~2005, such segregated assets totaled $0 and $980, respectively. Part 30.7 of the CFTC regulations also requires Series A’s futures commission merchant to secure assets of Series A related to foreign futures trading which totaled $~~15,790~~0 and $~~15,968~~0 at June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and December 31, ~~2004~~2005, respectively. There are no segregation requirements for assets related to forward trading.

~~-9-~~Note 5. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 20, 2006, the Board of Directors of Preferred, the managing owner of World Monitor Trust, resolved to dissolve World Monitor Trust (and each of Series A and Series B) and liquidate its assets in accordance with the terms of World Monitor Trust’s Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement. The Directors of Preferred also resolved to mandatorily redeem any Limited Interests of World Monitor Trust that are outstanding on August 25, 2006 as of that date.

-8-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 56. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following information presents per interest operating performance data and other supplemental financial data for the Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006, Second Quarter ~~2004~~2005, Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006 and Year-To-Date ~~2004~~2005. This information has been derived from information presented in the financial statements.

	Second Quarter						Year-To-Date
	2005(Unaudited)			2004(Unaudited)			2005(Unaudited)			2004(Unaudited)
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Per Interest Performance (for an interest outstanding throughout the entire period)
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net asset value per interest at beginning of period	$	76.59		$	119.46		$	81.14		$	123.39
Per Interest Performance
Net realized gain (loss) and change in net unrealized gain on commodity transactions (1), (3)		12.26			(19.31	)		9.01			(20.95	)
(for an interest outstanding throughout the entire period)
Interest income (1), (3)		0.55			0.32			0.99			0.64
Net asset value per interest at beginning of period	$	90.60		$	76.59		$	87.41		$	81.14
Expenses (1), (3)		(2.58	)		(2.59	)		(4.32	)		(5.20	)
Net realized gain (loss) and change in net unrealized gain on commodity transactions (1), (3)		(4.91	)		12.26			(0.26	)		9.01
Net increase (decrease) for the period		10.23			(21.58	)		5.68			(25.51	)
Interest income (1), (3)		1.09			0.55			2.08			0.99
Net asset value per interest at end of period	$	86.82		$	97.88		$	86.82		$	97.88
Expenses (1), (3)		(2.12	)		(2.58	)		(4.57	)		(4.32	)
Net increase (decrease) for the period		(5.94	)		10.23			(2.75	)		5.68
Net asset value per interest at end of period	$	84.66		$	86.82		$	84.66		$	86.82
Total Return (4)
Total return before incentive fees		14(6.1556	)%		~~(18~~14.0615	)%		7(2.7776	)%		~~(20~~7.8477	)%
Incentive fees		(0.8000	)%		(0.0080	)%		(0.77 38	)%		(0.1777	)%
Total return after incentive fees		13(6.3556	)%		~~(18~~13.0635	)%		7(3.0014	)%		~~(20~~7.6700	)%
Supplemental Data
Ratios to average net asset value:(3)
Net investment loss before incentive fees (2), (5)		(74.1341	)%		(87.4713	)%		(74.1876	)%		(87.3018	)%
Incentive fees (4)		(0.8000	)%		(0.0080	)%		(0.7738	)%		(0.1777	)%
Net investment loss after incentive fees		(74.9341	)%		(87.4793	)%		(75.9514	)%		(87.1395	)%
Interest income (5)		24.7863	%		12.2078	%		24.6258	%		12.1362	%
Incentive fees (4)		0.8000	%		0.0080	%		0.7738	%		(0.1777	)%
Other expenses (5)		9.9204	%		9.6792	%		9.8134	%		9.4381	%
Total expenses		109.7204	%		910.6772	%		109.5872	%		910.2658	%

Total returns are calculated based on the change in value of an interest during the period. An individual interestholder’s total returns and ratios may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of redemptions.

(1) Interest income per interest and expenses per interest are calculated by dividing interest income and expenses by the weighted average number of interests outstanding during the period. Net realized ~~gain~~ (loss) and change in net unrealized gain on commodity transactions is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per interest with the other per interest information.

⁽²⁾	Represents interest income less total expenses (exclusive of incentive fees).

(3) For the ~~Second~~second ~~Quarter~~quarter ~~2005~~2006 and ~~Year~~year-Toto-~~Date~~date ~~2005~~2006, includes ~~the~~Series ~~Fund~~A’s proportionate share of income and expense of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

⁽⁴⁾	Not annualized.

⁽⁵⁾	Annualized.

-109-

SECTION II

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2004~~ ~~(Audited)~~2005

	June 24, 2005		December 31,2004
	June 30, 2006		December 31,2005
ASSETS
Cash in commodity trading accounts	$	33,152,142	$	42,836,462
Equity in broker trading accounts
Cash in forward trading accounts		6,233,016		0
Cash in commodity trading accounts	$	34,167,625	$	40,427,991
Net unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts		1,548,076		(657,261	)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on open contracts		58,899		(1,270,180	)
Net unrealized gain on open forward contracts		1,590,528		0
Total assets	$	34,226,524	$	39,157,811
Accounts receivable		345		0
Interest receivable		62,580		40,442
Total assets	$	42,586,687	$	42,219,643
LIABILITIES
Commissions payable	$	53,~~787~~649	$	~~435~~5,377
Management fee payable		6765,~~041~~475		6478,~~650~~910
Incentive fee payable		21,377		0
Redemptions payable		52,581		316,109
Redemptions payable		138,254		258,271
Total liabilities		121,705		400,396
Total liabilities		232,459		323,356
Commitments
MEMBERS’ CAPITAL (Net Asset Value)
Member A		21,~~564~~784,~~308~~720		2,~~980~~160,~~766~~971
Member F		3932,~~789~~320,~~920~~099		3836,~~915~~596,~~521~~444
Total members’ capital (Net Asset Value)		4234,~~354~~104,~~228~~819		4138,~~896~~757,~~287~~415
Total liabilities and members’ capital	$	4234,~~586~~226,~~687~~524	$	4239,~~219~~157,~~643~~811

See accompanying notes.

-212-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

CONDENSED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS

June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2004~~ ~~(Audited)~~2005

	June 24, 2005					December 31, 2004
	June 30, 2006					December 31, 2005
Futures Contracts	Net UnrealizedGain (Loss) as a % ofNet Asset Value		NetUnrealizedGain (Loss)			Net UnrealizedGain (Loss) as a % ofNet Asset Value		NetUnrealizedGain (Loss)
	NetUnrealizedGain (Loss)as a % ofTrust Capital		NetUnrealizedGain (Loss)			NetUnrealizedGain (Loss)as a % ofTrust Capital		NetUnrealizedGain (Loss)
Futures Contracts
Futures contracts purchased:
Commodities	0.9927	%	$	~~419~~92,~~811~~936		(0.0688	)%	$	(25340,~~083~~904	)
Currencies	0.00	%		0		(1.01	)%		(425,541	)
Interest rates	(0.16	)%		(53,968	)	0.03	%		13,407
Interest rates	2.75	%		1,164,284		0.13	%		56,691
Stock indices	0.19	%		65,649		(0.06	)%		(24,587	)
Stock indices	(0.16	)%		(67,807	)	0.69	%		289,217
Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts purchased	0.30	%		104,617		(0.91	)%		(352,084	)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts purchased	3.58	%		1,516,288		(0.25	)%		(104,716	)
Futures contracts sold:
Commodities	(0.0810	)%		31(35,~~788~~343	)	(0.0100	)%		~~(5,788~~0	)
Currencies	0.00	%		0		(1.41	)%		(594,763	)
Interest rates	0.87	%		297,979		0.67	%		258,268
Interest rates	0.00	%		0		0.11	%		48,006
Stock indices	(0.09	)%		(32,229	)	(0.02	)%		(9,379	)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts sold	0.08	%		31,788		(1.31	)%		(552,545	)
Net unrealized gain on futures contracts sold	0.68	%		230,407		0.65	%		248,889
Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts	30.6698	%	$	1335,~~548,076~~024		(10.5626	)%	$	(~~657~~103,~~261~~195	)
Forward Contracts
Forward contracts purchased:
Net unrealized (loss) on forward contracts purchased	1.01	%	$	426,250		0.00	%	$	0
Net unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts purchased	0.27	%	$	91,096		(2.71	)%	$	(1,048,402	)
Forward contracts sold:
Net unrealized gain on forward contracts sold	2.75	%	$	1,164,278		0.00	%	$	0
Net unrealized (loss) on forward contracts sold	(1.08	)%		(367,221	)	(0.30	)%		(118,583	)
Net unrealized gain on forward contracts	3.76	%	$	1,590,528		0.00	%	$	0
Net unrealized (loss) on forward contracts	(0.81	)%	$	(276,125	)	(3.01	)%	$	(1,166,985	)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts			$	58,899				$	(1,270,180	)

See accompanying notes.

-313-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Periods ~~March 26~~April 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 24 30, 2006 ~~2005~~ and ~~January~~ 1March 26, 2005 to June 24, 2005 and

January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 and January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005

(Unaudited)

	For the PeriodMarch 26, 2005 toJune 24, 2005			For the PeriodJanuary 1, 2005 toJune 24, 2005
	For the PeriodApril 1, 2006 toJune 30, 2006				For the PeriodMarch 26, 2005 toJune 24, 2005		For the PeriodJanuary 1, 2006 toJune 30, 2006			For the PeriodJanuary 1, 2005 toJune 24, 2005
REVENUES
Realized	$	2(681,~~450,522~~036	)	$	~~585,511~~$	2,450,522	$	(1,376,132	)	$	585,511
Change in unrealized		3(1,~~589~~332,~~462~~028	)		~~3,795,865~~	3,589,462		1,329,080			3,795,865
Interest income		~~269~~443,~~801~~071			~~497,396~~	269,801		870,548			497,396
Total revenues		6(1,~~309~~569,~~785~~993	)		~~4,878,772~~	6,309,785		823,496			4,878,772
EXPENSES
Commissions		4325,~~029~~905			~~97,358~~	43,029		58,730			97,358
Management fee		~~204~~177,~~024~~996			~~388,754~~	204,024		364,916			388,754
Incentive fee		~~21,377~~0			~~21,377~~	21,377		0			21,377
Total expenses		~~268~~203,~~430~~901			~~507,489~~	268,430		423,646			507,489
NET INCOME	$	6,041,355		$	4,371,283
NET GAIN (LOSS)	$	(1,773,894	)		$	6,041,344	$	399,850		$	4,371,283

See accompanying notes.

-414-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL (NET ASSET VALUE)

For the ~~Period~~Periods January 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and

January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005

(Unaudited)

	Members’ Capital
	Member A			Member F			Total
For the period December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006
Balances at December 31, 2005	$	2,160,971		$	36,596,444		$	38,757,415
Net income for the period January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006		24,253			375,597			399,850
Redemptions		(400,504	)		(4,651,942	)		(5,052,446	)
Balances at June 30, 2006	$	1,784,720		$	32,320,099		$	34,104,819
For the period December 31, 2004 to June 24, 2005
Balances at December 31, 2004	$	2,980,766		$	38,915,521		$	41,896,287
Net income for the period January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005		262,135			4,109,148			4,371,283
Redemptions		(678,593	)		(3,234,749	)		(3,913,342	)
Balances at June 24, 2005	$	2,564,308		$	39,789,920		$	42,354,228

See accompanying notes.

-515-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1.

ORGANIZATION

General Description of the Company

WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) is a limited liability company organized under the laws of Delaware on November 3, 2004 and commenced trading operations on December 6, 2004. The Company was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures contracts, options on futures contracts and forward currency contracts and may, from time to time, engage in cash and spot transactions. The Company currently consists of two members: World Monitor Trust – Series A (“Member A”) and World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Member F”) (collectively, the “Members”). Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (“Preferred”) is the Managing Owner of each of the Members. Upon making the initial capital contribution, each Member received Voting Membership Interests.

The Company is a Member managed limited liability company that is not registered in any capacity with, or subject directly to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Trading Advisor

The Company entered into an advisory agreement with Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”) to make the trading decisions for the Company. The Trading Advisor manages approximately 100% of the assets of the Company pursuant to its Financial, Metal & Energy Large Portfolio.

Note 2.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Accounting

The statement of financial condition, including the condensed schedule of investments, as of June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006, and the statements of operations for the periods ~~March~~ 26April 1, ~~2005~~2006 to June 30, 2006 (“Second Quarter 2006”), March 26, 2005 to June 24, 2005 (“Second Quarter 2005”), January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 (“Year-To-Date 2006”), and January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005 (“Year-To-Date 2005”), and the ~~statement~~statements of changes in member ~~members’~~ capital for the ~~period~~periods January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 and January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005, are unaudited. The December 31, 2005 references were taken from audited financial statements. In the opinion of ~~management~~Preferred, such financial statements reflect all adjustments, which were of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position as of June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006, and the results of operations for the ~~periods~~Second ~~March~~Quarter 262006, Second Quarter 2005, toYear-To-Date ~~June~~2006 ~~24,~~and Year-To-Date 2005. ~~and~~The ~~January~~operating 1,results ~~2005~~for tothese ~~June~~interim ~~24,~~periods ~~2005~~may not be indicative of the results expected for a full year.

The financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

-616-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 2.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Basis of Accounting (Continued)

Commodity futures and forward transactions are reflected in the accompanying ~~statement~~statements of financial condition on the trade date. Net unrealized gain or loss on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) is reflected in the financial statements in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 39 – “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.” The market value of futures (exchange-traded) contracts is based upon the closing quotation on the various futures exchanges on which the contract is traded. The fair value of forward (non-exchange traded) contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices. Any change in net unrealized gain or loss during the current period is reported in the statement of operations. Realized gains and losses on commodity futures and forward transactions are recognized in the period in which the contracts are closed.

Brokerage commissions include other trading fees and are charged to expense when contracts are ~~opened~~entered into.

The Company has elected not to provide a Statement of Cash Flows as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 102, “Statement of Cash Flows – Exemption of Certain Enterprises and Classification of Cash Flows from Certain Securities Acquired for Resale.”

Consistent with standard business practices in the normal course of business, the Company has provided general indemnifications to its Trading Advisor and others when they act, in good faith, in the best interests of the Company. The Company is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim, but expects the risk of having to make any payments under these general business indemnifications to be remote.

Income Taxes

The Company is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. As such, the Company is not required to provide for, or pay, any Federal or state income taxes. Income tax attributes that arise from its operations are passed directly to the Members. The Company may be subject to other state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates.

Capital Accounts

The Company accounts for subscriptions, allocations and redemptions on a per member capital account basis.

The Company allocates profits and losses, prior to calculation of the incentive fee, for both financial and tax reporting purposes to its Members weekly on a pro rata basis based on each Member’s pro rata capital in the Company during the week. Each Member is then charged with the applicable incentive fee. Distributions (other than redemptions of capital) may be made at the sole discretion of the Members on a pro rata basis in accordance with the Members’ respective capital balances. The Company has not and does not presently intend to make any distributions.

-717-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 2.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however, it transacts business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at the date of the statement of financial condition. Income and expense items denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect during the period. Gains and losses resulting from the translation to U.S. dollars are reported in ~~income~~operations currently.

Note 3.

FEES

Organizational, General and Administrative Costs

~~Preferred has paid the costs associated with organizing the Company.~~ Under the WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. Organization Agreement, Preferred may allocate administrative costs of the Company to the Members. Administrative costs include legal, audit, postage and other routine third party administrative costs.

Management and Incentive Fees

The Company pays the Trading Advisor a management fee at an annual rate of 2% of the Company’s assets determined as of the close of business each Friday. The sum of the amounts determined each Friday will be paid monthly. For purposes of determining the management fee, any distributions, redemptions or reallocation of assets made as of the last Friday of each week shall be added back to the assets and there shall be no reduction for (i) the weekly management fees calculated or (ii) any accrued but unpaid incentive fees due the Trading Advisor.

Additionally, the ~~Company~~Members ~~pays~~pay the Trading Advisor an incentive fee of 22% (the “Incentive Fee”) of “New High Net Trading Profits” (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) ~~of each Member’s account~~. The incentive fee will accrue weekly and be paid quarterly. An incentive fee of $21,377 with respect to Member A was earned during the period January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005. No incentive fee was earned with respect to Member F during the period January 1, 2005 to June 24, 2005.

Note 4.

INCOME TAXES

There have been no differences between the tax basis and book basis of Members’ capital since inception of the Company.

Note 5.

DEPOSITS WITH COMMODITY BROKER

The Company deposits funds with a commodity broker subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations and various exchange and commodity broker requirements. Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of cash with such commodity broker. The Company earns interest income on assets deposited with the commodity broker.

-818-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 6.

SUBSCRIPTIONS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND REDEMPTIONS

Investments in the Company are made subject to the terms of the Organization Agreement.

The Company is not required to make distributions, but could do so at the discretion of the Members. A Member can request and receive redemption of capital, subject to the terms in the Organization Agreement.

Note 7.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS

The Company is exposed to various types of risks associated with the derivative instruments and related markets in which it invests. These risks include, but are not limited to, risk of loss from fluctuations in the value of derivative instruments held (market risk) and the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the Company’s investment activities (credit risk).

A. Market Risk

-919-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 7.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS (CONTINUED)

B. Credit Risk

When entering into futures or forward contracts, the Company is exposed to credit risk that the counterparty to the contract will not meet its obligations. The counterparty for futures contracts traded on United States and most foreign futures exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with the particular exchange. In general, a clearinghouse is backed by its corporate members who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members (i.e., some foreign exchanges), it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. On the other hand, there is concentration risk on forward transactions entered into by the Company, as the Company’s forward broker is the sole counterparty. The Company has entered into a master netting agreement with its forward broker and, as a result, when applicable, presents unrealized gains and losses on open forward positions as a net amount in the statements of financial condition. The amount at risk associated with counterparty non-performance of all of the Company’s contracts is the net unrealized gain included in the statement of financial condition; however, counterparty non-performance on only certain of the Company’s contracts may result in greater loss than non-performance on all of the Company’s contracts. There can be no assurance that any counterparty, clearing member or clearinghouse will meet its obligations to the Company.

~~The~~Preferred ~~Managing Owner~~ attempts to minimize both credit and market risks by requiring the Company and its Trading Advisor to abide by various ~~trading~~ trading limitations and policies. Preferred monitors compliance with these trading limitations and policies, which include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing all trades with creditworthy counterparties; limiting the amount of margin or ~~premium~~ premium required for any one commodity or all commodities combined; and generally limiting transactions to contracts which are traded in sufficient volume to permit the taking and liquidating of positions. Additionally, pursuant to the Advisory ~~Agreement~~ Agreement among the Company, Preferred and the Trading Advisor, the Company shall automatically terminate the Trading Agreement, if the net asset value allocated to the Trading Advisor declines by 40% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the effective date of the Advisory Agreement. The decline in net asset value is after giving effect for distributions, subscriptions and redemptions.

The Company’s commodity broker, in accepting orders for the purchase or sale of domestic futures contracts, is required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to the Company all assets of the Company relating to domestic futures trading and is not allowed to commingle such assets with its other assets. At June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and December 31, ~~2004~~2005, such segregated assets totaled $35,~~065~~484,~~498~~466 and $54,~~765~~041,~~078~~188, respectively. Part 30.7 of the CFTC regulations also requires the Company’s futures commission merchant to secure assets of the Company related to foreign futures trading which totaled $3129,~~634~~018,~~720~~183 and $3639,~~414,123~~ 656 at June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 and December 31, ~~2004~~2005, respectively. There are no segregation requirements for assets related to forward trading.

As of June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006, all open futures contracts mature within 12nine months.

-1020-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Note 8.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following information presents the financial highlights of the Company for the Second Quarter 2006, Second Quarter 2005, Year-To-Date 2006 and Year-To-Date 2005. This information has been derived from information presented in the financial statements.

	Second Quarter 2006				Year-To-Date 2006
	Member A		Member F		Member A		Member F
Total return (1)	(4.97	)%	(4.97	)%	1.25	%	1.08	%
Total expenses(2)	2.12	%	2.12	%	2.23	%	2.22	%
Net investment income (2)	2.49	%	2.49	%	2.34	%	2.35	%
	Second Quarter 2005				Year-To-Date 2005
	Member A		Member F		Member A		Member F
Total Return (1)
Total return (1)	15.48	%	16.40	%	10.80	%	11.68	%
Total return before incentive fee	16.40	%	16.40	%	11.68	%	11.68	%
Total expenses(2)	3.34	%	2.54	%	3.33	%	2.56	%
Incentive fee	(0.92	)%	0.00	%	(0.88	)%	0.00	%
Net investment income (2)	0.23	%	0.23	%	0.06	%	0.06	%
Total Return after incentive fee	15.48	%	16.40	%	10.80	%	11.68	%
Ratios to average net asset value:
Expenses prior to incentive fee (2)	2.54	%	2.54	%	2.56	%	2.56	%
Incentive fee (1)	0.80	%	0.00	%	0.77	%	0.00	%
Total expenses and incentive fee	3.34	%	2.54	%	3.33	%	2.56	%
Net investment income (2), (3)	0.23	%	0.23	%	0.06	%	0.06	%

Total ~~return~~returns ~~and~~are ~~ratios~~based toon average net asset value and are calculated for Members’ capital taken as a whole. An individual Member’s total ~~return~~returns and ratios may vary from the above ~~return~~returns and ratios based on the timing of redemptions.

(1) Not annualized and includes realized and unrealized gains on securities transactions.

⁽²⁾	Annualized.

~~(3)~~-21- ~~Represents interest income less total expenses (exclusive of incentive fee).~~

-11-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A

(a Delaware Business Trust)

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Report includes forward-looking statements that reflect Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.’s (“Preferred” or the “Managing Owner”) current expectations about the future results, performance, prospects and opportunities of World Monitor Trust – Series A (the “Trust” or “Series A”). The Managing Owner has tried to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “should,” “estimate” or the negative of those terms or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to the Managing Owner and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors, both known, such as those described in this Report, and unknown, that could cause the Trust’s actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as expressly required by the Federal securities laws, the Managing Owner undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or the risks, uncertainties or other factors described in this Report, as a result of new information, future events or changed circumstances or for any other reason after the date of this Report.

Effective December 6, 2004, Series A contributed its net assets to WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) and received a Voting Membership Interest in the Company. The Company was formed to function as an aggregate trading vehicle. The sole members of the Company are Series A and World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”). Preferred is the Managing Owner of Series F and has been delegated administrative authority over the operations of the Company. The Company engages in the speculative trading of futures and forward contracts. The following discussion and analysis refers to Series A’s activities both directly and through its investment in the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies

Preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the application of appropriate accounting rules and guidance, as well as the use of estimates. Series A’s application of these policies involves judgments and actual results may differ from the estimates used.

The Managing Owner has evaluated the nature and types of estimates that it makes in preparing the Series A’s financial statements and related disclosures and has determined that the valuation of its investments which are not traded on a United States or Internationally recognized futures exchange involves a critical accounting policy. The market values of futures (exchange traded) contracts isare verified by the administrator who obtains valuation data from third party data providers such as Bloomberg and Reuters and compares those prices with the Series A’s broker. The market value of currency swap and forward (non-exchange traded) contracts is are extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of 3 PM on the last business day of the reporting period. All values assigned by the administrator and confirmed by the Managing Owner are final and conclusive as to all Interest holders.

As such, if actual results vary from estimates used, they are anticipated to not have a material impact on the financial statements and related disclosures.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Series A commenced operations on June 10, 1998 with gross proceeds of $6,039,177 allocated to commodities trading. Interests in Series A continued to be offered weekly until Series A achieved its subscription maximum of $34,000,000 during November 1999. The Managing Owner suspended the offering of interests in World Monitor Trust – Series B and World Monitor Trust – Series C and allowed all selling registrations to expire by April 30, 2002. Series C was liquidated effective September 20, 2004. As such, interests owned in one series of World Monitor Trust may no longer be exchanged for interests of one or more other series of World Monitor Trust.

Interests in Series A may be redeemed on a weekly basis. Redemptions of limited interests for Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006, Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006, and for the period from June 10, 1998 (commencement of operations) to June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 were $~~469~~67,~~215~~883, $~~545~~316,~~437~~736 and $2526,~~372~~138,~~926~~147, respectively. ~~While~~Redemptions ~~there were no redemptions~~ of general interests during Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006, ~~and~~ Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006, ~~redemptions~~and ~~of general interests~~ for the period from June 10, 1998 (commencement of operations) to June 30, 2006 24were $763, ~~2005~~$3,663 ~~were~~and $~~246~~261,~~342~~290, respectively. Future redemptions will impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contracts in subsequent periods. On July 20, 2006, the Board of Directors of Preferred, the managing owner of World Monitor Trust, resolved to dissolve World Monitor Trust (and each of Series A and Series B) and liquidate its assets in accordance with the terms of World Monitor Trust’s Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement. The Directors of Preferred also resolved to mandatorily redeem any Limited Interests of World Monitor Trust that are outstanding on August 25, 2006 as of that date.

At June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006, 100% of Series A’s net assets were allocated to commodities trading through it’s investment in the Company. A significant portion of the net assets was held in cash, which was used as margin for ~~Series A’s~~ trading in commodities. ~~Inasmuch~~In as much as the sole business of Series A is to trade in commodities, Series A continues to own such liquid assets to be used as margin. ~~PFD~~The broker credits Series A ~~monthly~~ with interest income on 100% of ~~the~~its ~~interest it~~average ~~earns~~daily onequity ~~the~~maintained ~~average~~in ~~net~~its ~~assets~~accounts inwith ~~Series~~them ~~A’s~~each ~~accounts~~month.

-22-

The commodities contracts are subject to periods of illiquidity because of market conditions, regulatory considerations and other reasons. For example, some commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in certain commodity futures contract prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily limits.” During a single day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract for a particular commodity has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in the commodity can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Commodity futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Such market conditions could prevent Series A from promptly liquidating its commodity futures positions.

1Since Series A’s business is to trade futures and forward contracts, through it’s investment in the Company, it’s capital is at risk due to changes in the value of these contracts (market risk) or the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contract (credit risk). Series A’s exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the volatility of interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, the liquidity of the markets in which the contracts are traded and the relationships among the contracts held. The inherent uncertainty of Series A’s speculative trading, as well as the development of drastic market occurrences, could result in monthly losses considerably beyond Series A’s experience to date and could ultimately lead to a loss of all or substantially all of investors’ capital. The Managing Owner attempts to minimize these risks by requiring Series A, through it’s investment in the Company, to abide by various trading limitations and policies, which include limiting margin amounts, trading only in liquid markets and permitting the use of stop loss provisions. See Note 4 to the financial statements for a further discussion on the credit and market risks associated with Series A’s futures and forward contracts.

Since Series A’s business is to trade futures and forward contracts, its capital is at risk due to changes in the value of these contracts (market risk) or the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contract (credit risk). Series A’s exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the volatility of interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, the liquidity of the markets in which the contracts are traded and the relationships among the contracts held. The inherent uncertainty of Series A’s speculative trading, as well as the development of drastic market occurrences, could result in monthly losses considerably beyond Series A’s experience to date and could ultimately lead to a loss of all or substantially all of investors’ capital. The Managing Owner attempts to minimize these risks by requiring Series A and its trading advisor to abide by various trading limitations and policies, which include limiting margin amounts, trading only in liquid markets and permitting the use of stop loss provisions. See Note 4 to the financial statements for a further discussion on the credit and market risks associated with Series A’s futures and forward contracts.

Series A does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

As of June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006, Series A has not utilized special purpose entities to facilitate off-balance sheet financing arrangements and has no loan guarantee arrangements or off-balance sheet arrangements of any kind other than agreements entered into in the normal course of business, which may include indemnification provisions related to certain risks service providers, such as our accountants, undertake in performing services which are in the best interests of Series A. While Series A’s exposure under such indemnification provisions cannot be estimated, these general business indemnifications are not expected to have a material impact on the Series A’s financial position.

Series A’s contractual obligations are with the Managing Owner, the Trading Advisor and its commodity broker. Payments made under the Series A’s agreement with the Trading Advisor are at a fixed rate, calculated as a percentage of the Series A’s “New High Net Trading Profits”. In addition, management fee payments made to the Trading Advisor and fees paid to the Managing Owner are calculated as a fixed percentage of Series A’s Net Asset Values. As such, the Managing Owner cannot anticipate the amount of payments that will be required under these agreements for ~~future~~futures periods as Net Asset Values are not known until a future date. Commission payments to the commodity broker are based on cost per executed trade and, as such, the Managing Owner cannot anticipate the amount of payments that will be required under the brokerage agreement for future periods as the level of executed trades are not ~~known~~know until a future date. These agreements are effective for one-year terms, renewable automatically for additional one-year terms unless terminated. Additionally, these agreements may be terminated by either party for various reason. For a further discussion on these payments, see Notes 1 and 3 of Series A’s ~~2004~~ 2005 Annual Report.

Results of Operations

The net asset value per interest as of June 24 30, ~~2005~~2006 was $8684.8266, a ~~increase~~decrease of 73.0015% from the December 31, ~~2004~~2005 net asset value per interest of $8187.1441 and a ~~increase~~decrease of 136.3556% from the March 25 31, ~~2005~~2006 net asset value per interest of $7690.5960. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Series A’s had gross trading ~~gains~~losses ~~were~~of approximately ($~~401~~105,000) and gains of $~~283,000~~700 during Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006 and Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006, compared to ~~losses~~approximately of $~~850~~401,000 and $~~923~~283,000 in trading gains during Second Quarter ~~2004~~2005 and Year-To-Date ~~2004, respectively~~2005. Due to the nature of Series A’s trading activities, a period to period comparison of its trading results is not meaningful. However, a detailed discussion of Series A’s Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006 trading results is presented below.

~~Quarterly~~Second Quarter ~~Market~~2006 Economic Overview

~~The~~News USfrom ~~economy~~the ~~continued~~Federal ~~to outperform~~Reserve ~~both~~(“Fed”) ~~Europe~~ and ~~Asia~~its new chairman, Ben Bernanke, dominated the markets in the second quarter of ~~2005,~~2006. ~~although~~Chairman ~~growth~~Bernanke ~~showed~~appears ~~some~~fully ~~evidence~~committed ofto afighting ~~modest~~inflation ~~slowdown.~~and ~~The~~has ~~Federal~~quickly ~~Reserve~~eliminated ~~continued~~speculation that ~~its~~he ~~policy~~might oftake ~~measured~~a 25softer ~~point~~stance ~~rate~~than ~~increases~~his ~~and~~predecessor. ~~the~~The ~~statement~~Fed ~~from~~continued ~~the~~to ~~June~~raise ~~30th~~rates ~~Federal~~throughout ~~Open~~the quarter. The Fed ~~Market~~minutes ~~Committee~~have ~~meeting~~repeatedly ~~indicated~~stated that itthe ~~will~~Federal ~~maintain~~Open ~~this~~Market ~~policy~~Committee’s in(“FOMC”) ~~the~~actions ~~third~~will ~~quarter~~be ofdata ~~2005,~~dependent and ~~possibly~~to ~~beyond.~~this ~~The~~point ~~Federal~~that ~~Reserve~~means ~~has~~the ~~now~~rate ~~raised~~hike ~~interest~~cycle ~~rates~~is atlikely ~~nine~~to ~~consecutive~~continue ~~meetings,~~at toleast ~~the~~for ~~current~~one 3addition meeting.~~25%.~~ ~~This~~As ~~has helped strengthen~~global ~~both~~liquidity ~~the US dollar~~ and USgeopolitical ~~treasuries,~~concerns asarose during the USsecond ~~has~~quarter, aU.S. ~~distinct~~Treasury ~~rate~~yields ~~advantage~~found ~~over~~safe ~~Europe~~haven ~~and Japan~~support.

~~Gains~~Inflation inand housing were again the major USfactors ~~economy~~within ~~were~~the ~~not~~U.S. ~~shared~~economic bylandscape. ~~Europe~~As ~~and~~gasoline ~~Japan,~~prices ~~with~~continued ~~Europe~~to inrise, ~~particular~~inflation ~~showing~~data ~~economic~~drew ~~malaise~~particular attention. ~~Germany~~The ~~and~~housing ~~France~~market ~~showed~~was ~~low~~somewhat ~~growth~~mixed and ~~weak~~the ~~employment,~~outlook ~~and~~remains ~~Italy~~uncertain. isDespite ~~essentially~~these infactors, afinal ~~recession.~~first ~~Even~~quarter ~~the~~Gross ~~UK,~~Domestic ~~which~~Product ~~had~~(“GDP”) ~~previously~~was ~~outperformed~~revised ~~the~~upwards ~~rest~~to of5.3% ~~Europe,~~from ~~began~~the tooriginal ~~show weakness~~4.6%. ~~The~~However, ~~result~~the ~~has~~impact ~~been~~of a ~~slide~~weaker inhousing ~~the~~sector ~~British~~and ~~pound~~high gasoline and ~~growing~~energy ~~speculation~~prices ~~that~~may ~~the~~be ~~Bank~~starting ofto ~~England~~take ~~may~~a ~~cut~~toll, ~~interest~~as ~~rates~~the aspreliminary ~~soon~~GDP asfor ~~early~~the ~~July~~second quarter was lower than expected at 2.5%.

The economic outlook in Japan is somewhat better than in Europe. The Bank of Japan’s recently released quarterly Tankan Survey of Corporate Sentiment showed widespread improvement in June, with both large and small manufacturers as well as non-~~manufacturers~~23- ~~more optimistic about business conditions. This came in spite of high oil prices and a sharp decline in export growth.~~

The Eurozone continued to experience economic improvement in the second quarter. However, like the U.S., the third quarter may present a somewhat less buoyant picture. The euro turned in a strong quarter benefiting from central bank currency diversification. Interest rates were a primary focus as the European Central Bank (“ECB”) hiked rates by 25 basis points to 2.75% at its June meeting with further increases anticipated later in the year. An ongoing pattern of improved economic data was noted, particularly from Germany. In the U.K., the Bank of England (“BOE”) made no rate changes; economic data was fairly decent but showed some strain as the third quarter began

~~Currencies:~~In ~~Following~~Japan, aspeculation ~~weak~~that ~~performance in April,~~ the ~~euro~~Bank ~~experienced a further decline for much~~ of ~~May~~Japan ~~and hit~~(“BOJ”) awould ~~10-month~~finally ~~low in June before firming a bit at the~~ end ofits ~~the~~“zero ~~month. A major factor was the pattern of global~~ interest ~~rates,~~rate” ~~which~~policy ~~put~~proved ~~the~~correct ~~euro~~as atthey imposed a ~~distinct disadvantage~~0.25% ~~The~~rate ~~British~~during ~~pound hit an 8-month low on June 30th. Part of~~ the ~~euro’s recovery~~first ~~toward~~week ~~the end~~ of ~~June~~July. Japan was ~~related~~at to the ~~belief~~forefront ~~that the European Central Bank will wait until later in the year to move rates, given its long history~~ of ~~being slow to act. Additionally, surging crude oil prices raised inflation concerns. The euro continued to suffer from~~ the ~~rejection~~short-lived ofliquidity ~~the European Union constitution by French and Dutch voters. During the quarter~~crisis, ~~the~~which ~~Swiss~~instigated ~~franc also hit~~ a 10sell-~~month~~off ~~low~~in ~~prior~~global ~~to a modest recovery. Despite recent strength against many currencies,~~assets ~~the~~during ~~US dollar continues to suffer weakness within~~ the ~~long-term~~second ~~trend.~~quarter, ~~The~~and ~~latest~~their ~~data~~equity onmarket ~~the~~fell USapproximately ~~Current Account Deficit was released on June 17th showing a 3.6~~9% ~~increase to a record $195~~.1 ~~billion~~Other inAsian ~~the~~equity ~~first~~markets ~~quarter~~saw ~~of 2005. The deficit amounted to~~ a ~~record~~similar ~~6.4%~~fate ofwith Korea, ~~the~~Hong USKong ~~Gross Domestic Product~~ and ~~was~~Shanghai ~~larger~~also ~~than~~experiencing ~~predicted~~weakness. ~~The~~Despite ~~Japanese yen fell to a 10-month low against~~ the UStemporary ~~dollar~~disruption, ~~amid~~overall ~~concerns~~economic ~~surrounding~~data ~~high oil prices. Moreover~~from Japan, ~~a declining trade surplus~~ and ~~a growing dependence on~~ the ~~domestic~~region ~~economy~~in ~~served~~general, toshowed ~~pressure~~an ~~the~~improved ~~yen with Japan’s Gross Domestic Product running at about 1~~tone.~~5%.~~ ~~While Japan~~China’s ~~economy~~growth ~~is not in nearly as bad shape as Europe’s, it~~ continues to ~~suffer~~be ~~and the Bank of Japan continues in an accommodative stance. Among other currencies~~strong, ~~the~~as ~~Australian~~second ~~dollar~~quarter ~~entered~~GDP ~~June~~rose ~~with~~to a 10 year~~-to-date~~ ~~loss~~high of ~~about 2~~11.52%. ~~versus~~The ~~the~~Bank ~~US dollar but rising metals and energy prices helped the currency recover most~~ of ~~that~~China ~~and~~raised itinterest isrates ~~now~~in ~~essentially~~April ~~flat for~~in ~~the~~an ~~year.~~attempt ~~The~~to ~~Canadian~~harness ~~dollar~~growth ~~also had a positive June, gaining about 2.5%~~ and ~~lowering~~ its inflationary ~~year-to-date loss versus the US dollar to approximately 2~~implications.~~0%.~~ ~~The~~Further ~~South~~rate ~~African~~hikes ~~rand,~~are ~~which declined approximately 9% in May versus the US dollar, continued to decline in June~~expected.

~~Energies: Crude oil prices continued to rise in June, and for most of the second quarter.~~ The ~~driving~~Canadian ~~factors~~economy tohas ~~the~~been ~~price~~moving ~~increase~~at ~~included~~ a ~~growing~~brisk ~~concern~~pace ~~that~~all ~~refinery~~year ~~facilities will be unable to produce gasoline~~ and ~~heating oil to satisfy~~ the ~~seemingly~~Bank ~~inelastic~~of ~~demand~~Canada ~~for these~~has ~~products.~~steadily ~~Consumer~~raised ~~demand~~rates. ~~for~~However, ~~these~~the ~~products~~statement ~~persists~~ at ~~a rapid pace with record demand seen as~~ the ~~July~~conclusion ~~4th~~of ~~holiday~~its ~~approached.~~most ~~Additionally,~~recent ~~geopolitical~~meeting ~~factors~~suggests ~~played~~that a ~~part~~pause inmay ~~the~~be ~~rally,~~on ~~including a brief Nigerian strike and growing tensions between~~ the ~~Nigerian government and local oil workers~~horizon. The ~~Iranian~~Canadian ~~elections~~dollar ~~also~~strengthened ~~helped to increase prices~~ in the ~~market,~~second ~~as Tehran’s Mayor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, considered an extreme conservative, was elected President of Iran. Natural gas was not nearly as buoyant during the~~ quarter ~~although prices rallied in June. The weather was supportive, with extreme heat noted in key consuming regions for much~~ of ~~June.~~2006 ~~However,~~and ~~the US Department of Energy~~Canada’s ~~inventory~~economic ~~reports~~fortunes ~~noted~~seem ~~that inventories were sufficient~~bright.

~~Indices:~~Currencies The second quarter was truly mixed for US equities, with April a down month, May a positive one, and June showing little change. For the quarter, the Dow fell 1.7%, the S&P 500 rose 1.2% and the Nasdaq rose 1.3%. During the second quarter, the US equity markets were directionless. There was plenty of mergers and acquisition activity and earnings were respectable. However, there were concerns, including the well-documented problems at General Motors and Ford. Economic data was decent but not inspiring. Crude oil prices running near $60 per barrel put pressure on the markets and a stronger US dollar raised some profit concerns. In the June 30th statement following its ninth consecutive 25 point rate hike, the Federal Reserve indicated that it is not done raising rates, resulting in stocks ending the month with a weak final session, including a triple digit loss for the Dow. European equities had a positive month and a positive quarter despite lackluster economic data, the failure of the European Union to reach a budget agreement and the “no” votes on the European Union constitution. The UK, which had previously avoided much of Europe’s economic decline, showed evidence of weakness in the second quarter. Regardless, the FTSE gained 149 points in June to 5,113 and is up 6.2% year-to-date. The Nikkei, which declined 660 points in April and recovered 265 points in May, was weak early in June, but rebounded to end the month up 300 points. Japanese economic data was mixed, showing some improvement domestically, but displaying weakness on the export front.

Interest ~~Rates:~~rates ~~The~~were USthe ~~treasury~~primary ~~market~~drivers ~~for~~of the ~~most~~currency ofsector in the second quarter ~~was~~of ~~characterized by lower yields and a flatter yield curve~~2006. ~~After~~The ~~closing out May at 3~~U.~~98% and falling to 3~~S.~~82%~~ indollar ~~early~~suffered ~~June,~~against the ~~yield~~euro onas the ~~benchmark~~ECB ~~10-year note~~appears ~~briefly spiked~~ to ~~4.15%~~be ~~but~~at ~~fell to 3.96% by~~ the ~~end~~beginning of ~~June.~~its ~~The~~rate ~~spread~~hike ~~between~~cycle ~~the 2-year~~ and ~~10-year notes, which stood at 55 points in April and 40 points at~~ the ~~end~~Fed ofappears ~~May,~~to ~~further~~be ~~narrowed~~close to ~~34 points at~~ the end. ~~of June~~Additionally, ~~with~~a ~~increasing talk~~continued pattern of improving aeconomic ~~potential~~data in ~~inverted~~the ~~yield~~Eurozone ~~curve.~~was ~~The~~noted ~~flight~~throughout tothe ~~safety buying of Treasuries which occurred in April and May~~quarter, ~~persisted~~particularly infrom ~~June~~Germany, ~~albeit~~the atleading adriver ~~lessened~~of ~~pace~~the region’s growth. The ~~Federal~~euro ~~Reserve~~also ~~raised~~benefited ~~interest~~from ~~rates~~central ~~another~~bank 25currency ~~basis~~diversification ~~points~~away ~~on June 30th and the statement~~ from the ~~Federal Open Market Committee indicated that it will continue to raise rates at a measured pace~~ U.S. ~~The~~dollar ~~European~~as ~~Central~~the ~~Bank~~global ~~and~~reserve ~~Bank~~currency, ofas ~~England~~Russia, ~~did~~China, ~~not change rates. However~~Sweden, atand the ~~end~~United ofArab ~~June~~Emirates ~~there~~were ~~was~~prominent ~~growing~~in ~~speculation~~this ~~that both may cut rates soon~~trend, ~~led~~which inis ~~part~~expected byto acontinue. ~~surprisingly~~Despite ~~aggressive~~this 50pressure, ~~basis~~the ~~point reduction by Sweden’s Riksbank to 1~~U.5%S. ~~The~~dollar ~~Bank~~attracted offlight ~~Canada~~to ~~and~~safety ~~Reserve~~support ~~Bank~~in ofmid ~~Australia~~June when ~~left~~the Korean ~~rates~~missile ~~unchanged~~crisis emerged.

~~Metals:~~In ~~After~~Japan, ~~falling~~the ~~nearly~~focus 5%was inalso ~~May,~~on ~~gold~~interest ~~prices~~rates, ~~rose~~as ~~sharply~~market inparticipants ~~June~~attempted to ~~their highest~~discern ~~levels~~when ~~since~~the ~~mid-March.~~BOJ would Asend ~~June~~its ~~ended,~~long ~~gold~~standing ~~appeared~~“zero ~~headed~~interest ~~for~~rate” ~~still higher levels~~policy. ~~Uncertainty~~The ~~surrounding~~BOJ ~~global~~drained ~~equity~~liquidity ~~markets~~throughout ~~and relatively low global interest rates helped~~ the ~~rally~~quarter in ~~gold.~~preparation ~~Silver did not keep pace with gold’s rally, although it remained higher~~ for ~~the~~this ~~year~~eventuality. ~~Among~~The ~~the~~Japanese ~~base~~economy ~~metals,~~continues ~~copper gained approximately 8% during June and was up 12% year-~~to~~-date~~ improve, ~~although~~as ~~prices~~highlighted ~~eased~~by ~~from~~one ~~16-year highs~~ of ~~over $1.60 per pound in~~ the ~~final~~most ~~half~~watched ~~of June. Strong demand~~economic ~~from~~indicators, ~~China~~the ~~continued~~Tankan ~~to drive prices higher~~Report, aswhich itwas ~~did~~released inat the ~~first~~end ~~quarter~~ of ~~2005. Aluminum declined approximately 4.5% in~~ June and isthe ~~down~~second ~~approximately~~quarter ~~9.8%~~saw ~~year-to-date.~~the ~~Nickel,~~definitive ~~which~~conclusion ~~rose~~of ~~approximately~~the 7%nation’s indeflationary ~~May, experienced particular weakness as prices tumbled approximately 12~~era.5% inThe ~~June~~yen ~~due~~was topressured a ~~heavy~~bit ~~sell-off~~in ~~toward~~late ~~the end of~~ June, ~~leaving~~by ~~prices~~the ~~down~~scandal ~~approximately~~surrounding ~~1.5%~~BOJ ~~year-to-date.~~Governor Fukui.

3The Chinese yuan traded at 7.999 to the U.S. dollar in late June compared to 8.017 at the end of the first quarter and has gained slightly over 1% since its 2.1% revaluation in July 2005. Recent comments from Bank of China officials have hinted at a potentially faster pace, but the markets have lent little credence to this statement.

~~Quarterly~~Energies ~~Partnership Performance~~

The ~~following~~energy issector awas ~~summary~~volatile in the second quarter of ~~performance~~2006. Crude ended the quarter around $74 per barrel, up approximately 8.5% from the end of the previous quarter. Geopolitical uncertainty regarding Iran, North Korea and Nigeria were supportive of crude. Additional support is coming from increased demand from China and India. The price at the pump for unleaded gasoline remains high, but demand continued to display a relatively inelastic pattern. The only component of the ~~major~~sector ~~sectors~~that infell ~~which~~was natural gas. With plenty of supply, moderate temperatures and a slow start to the ~~Fund~~hurricane season, ~~traded:~~prices of natural gas continued their downward slide.

Grains

The sector was mixed for the quarter. On the production side of the equation, weather played the single largest role in corn prices for the second quarter. On a week-by-week basis, as chances for seasonally beneficial precipitation ebbed and flowed, corn prices moved higher and lower respectively. The start of the period found the corn market firmly ensconced in an uptrend that began at the end of calendar year 2005, but prices fell off sharply in June after the release of a U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) Supply/Demand Report that raised questions about the demand for corn. The decline in corn prices, along with many other commodity markets, may have had its roots in a consumption-restricting announcement made by the Chinese government. The statement made was that internal growth needed to be slowed, in light of a too-rapidly expanding economy. The graphic profile of the wheat market is almost identical as that seen in corn. For most of the second quarter, soybean prices moved sideways. Due to China’s dependence on Brazilian soybean imports, the tightening credit situation in China will likely not have as great a bearing on U.S. soybean prices.

Indices

By and large, global equity indices were lower in the second quarter of 2006 versus the first quarter of 2006. For most of the quarter, U.S. stocks suffered from the uncertainty surrounding the interest rate environment and from fears that the U.S. economy was slowing, mainly due to higher energy prices and a softer housing sector. The S&P 500 ended the quarter down 1.9% and the NASDAQ ended the quarter down 7.2%. Going forward U.S. equities are likely to remain highly sensitive to any events that might alter the outlook for the Fed, particularly inflation related data.

European markets had been strong for most of the year prior to the sell-off in May. Foreign money flows into Europe slowed significantly in May and were still at a somewhat reduced level in June. The German DAX ended the quarter down 4.8%, the French CAC 40 was down 4.9% and the British FTSE was down 2.2%.

-24-

Asian markets were very volatile, particularly in May and June, as a liquidity crunch was experienced in Japan and in various other sectors around the region. Indications of higher interest rates in Japan, Korea and China in coming months provided a negative tone, but the flow of economic data took on a positive tone and bodes well for the rest of the year. Japan’s Nikkei was down 9.1% for the quarter and Korea’s Kospi was down 4.7%. Australia’s All Ordinaries closed out the quarter down approximately 1%, but the strength in resource issues aided this market and the outlook for Australia is positive.

Interest Rates

U.S. Treasuries were in a rally mode for much of May and June as the markets evaluated the new Fed under Ben Bernanke. The FOMC appeared to be taking on a more aggressively anti-inflationary tone as the quarter progressed, with the Chairman and numerous Fed Governors focusing on the threat of inflation. After closing out the first quarter at 4.85%, the yield on the 10-year Treasury Note moved over 5.26% in mid June on the market view that that the Fed would continue to raise rates through the August meeting and possibly beyond. The softer tone of the statement accompanying the 25 basis point rate hike at the end of June caught the markets by surprise. While still recognizing the risk of inflation, the Fed gave greater credence to the potential for some economic slowing, and appeared to put into question the prospect of a further rate hike in August. As June concluded, the yield on the 10-year Treasury Note stood at 5.145%.

Outside of the U.S., the ECB raised rates 25 basis points in June to 2.75%. Statements by ECB President Jean Claude Trichet regarding inflation were mixed throughout the quarter, but were leaning towards the tightening side as June ended and additional ECB rate hikes are expected later this summer. Trichet has emphasized that inflation will remain elevated and that there is a risk of a surge in consumer prices. European data, particularly from Germany remains buoyant. The 10-year German Bund was yielding 4.07% at the end of June while the 30-year stood at 4.31%.

In the first week of July, the BOJ officially ended its “zero interest rate” policy by imposing a 0.25% rate, finally putting an end to the speculation that was rampant throughout the second quarter. Other Asian banks, including the Bank of Korea, raised rates in June and there are growing indications that the Bank of China will embark on a tightening bias to temper the expected 10% plus GDP growth and its inflationary potential. The Bank of Canada raised rates another 25 basis points but the accompanying statement hinted at a pause. The Reserve Bank of Australia held rates at 5.75% but there is speculation of an increase.

Metals

Gold had been in an upside surge for the entire year until things finally came to an end, at least temporarily, in late May. Global liquidity tightness, particularly in the Far East, which impacted other commodities as well as the equity and fixed income markets, served as a clear negative for gold and essentially put an end to the rally. Geopolitical concerns surrounding Iran, Iraq and Korea have been supportive for gold and are likely to aid the bull case in coming weeks. In addition, reserve asset diversification is likely to persist. Russia, China and Sweden, along with the United Arab Emirates and other petro-nations were active in that regard during the second quarter. Petrodollars have been flowing into gold for much of the year, although that slowed somewhat in June. Silver followed a similar pattern to gold, retaining its dependent relationship with the yellow metal.

The entire base metal complex was very volatile during the second quarter. Copper ended the quarter up 37% from the previous quarter, as labor and production problems in Mexico, Chile and Zambia added to the bullish scenario. With China forecast to see 10% plus GDP growth in 2006, the demand side of the equation still looks strong, as it does for most of Asia as well as the U.S. and Europe. Mines still lack the ability to significantly ramp up production, giving copper a solid fundamental base. After surging nearly 17% in May, zinc lost 15% in June but it is still up more than 75% for the year. Fundamentally, zinc presents the strongest picture among all the base metals as it faces a significant production deficit. Nickel rallied strongly for the quarter as well. While its fundamentals have improved, as stainless steel demand increased, the recent highs are vastly ahead of reasonable value.

Softs

The sector was mixed for the second quarter, with several markets experiencing significant sell-offs in May. Sugar had been extremely firm in the first quarter through mid second quarter, before undergoing a correction in May. Following a weak performance in May, which saw sugar decline over 11%, prices rebounded in June. However, the outlook is uncertain, as the weather in Brazil’s sugar producing areas has been crop friendly after a period of dry conditions. Coffee prices also fell in May, losing 10%. Brazilian weather has been excellent, which weighed on sentiment throughout the second quarter. The harvest has been moving at a brisk pace and at 35% complete for the season, is ahead of schedule. The second quarter saw cocoa prices trend higher. The Ivory Coast was the focus after the disarmament process broke down yet again. Cattle scored gains in May and June as the USDA announced an agreement with Japan to restart U.S. beef exports to that nation. Hogs also put in a strong June, as Far Eastern demand remained brisk.

Quarterly Performance of Series A

The following is a summary of performance for the major sectors in which Series A traded:

Sector P/L

Currencies: (+-): ~~The~~Long ~~major~~positions ~~currencies~~in ~~experienced a significant sell off versus~~ the Australian US dollar, ~~over~~and ~~the~~short ~~last~~positions ~~two~~in ~~months of~~ the ~~second~~Canadian ~~quarter. Gains~~dollar, ~~were~~Japanese ~~derived~~yen, ~~from~~and ~~short~~Swiss ~~positions~~franc oncontributed ~~the~~to ~~euro,~~ the ~~Swiss~~net ~~franc,~~loss ~~and~~for the ~~Japanese~~second ~~yen~~quarter of 2006.

Energies: (-+): Profits ~~The~~on ~~sector~~long ~~was~~and ~~choppy~~short ~~this~~positions ~~quarter~~in ~~with~~heating ~~prices~~oil, ~~rebounding~~and ~~after~~long apositions ~~mid-quarter~~in ~~sell-off~~Brent tocrude ~~finish~~resulted atin ~~levels~~a ~~close~~gain tofor ~~where they began~~ the second quarter. ~~Losses~~of ~~were generated on long positions in crude~~2006.

~~Indices (~~-):25- Global markets, excluding Japan, overcame losses during the first half of the second quarter to finish with modest gains for the quarter. Losses were generated from long and short positions in the DAX, S&P 500 and Nasdaq.

~~Interest~~Indices: ~~Rates~~ (+-): ~~The~~Long ~~prices~~positions ofin USthe S&P 500, ~~European~~the ~~and~~IBEX ~~Japanese~~35 ~~bonds~~and ~~all~~the ~~strengthened~~Nikkei, ~~during~~as ~~the~~well ~~second~~as ~~quarter.~~long ~~Long~~and short positions ~~along~~ in the ~~British~~DAX, ~~German~~ and ~~Japanese curves~~the DJ STOXX contributed ~~towards~~to losses in the ~~gain~~second quarter.

~~Metals~~Interest Rates: (-+): The ~~Most~~interest ofrate ~~the~~sector ~~industrial~~was ~~and~~up for the second ~~precious~~quarter ~~metals~~of ~~were~~2006. ~~trendless~~Short ~~for~~positions ~~the~~in ~~quarter~~Euribor, ~~making~~Eurodollar, ~~them~~Short ~~difficult~~Sterling toand ~~trade~~U.S. ~~Losses~~Treasury ~~were~~Notes ~~generated~~and ~~from~~Bonds ~~long~~contributed ~~and~~to ~~short~~the ~~positions~~sector’s inprofits ~~zinc~~for the quarter.

~~Series~~Metals: ~~A’s~~(+) The ~~average~~sector generated net ~~asset~~profits ~~levels~~for ~~Year-To-Date~~the ~~2005~~second ~~decreased~~quarter inof ~~comparison~~2006 toon ~~Year-To-Date~~gains ~~2004, primarily due to redemptions offset~~ in ~~part~~long bygold, ~~positive~~copper ~~trading performance~~and ~~during~~zinc ~~2005~~positions.

~~Interest income is earned on~~ Series A’s average net assets ~~held~~have atdeclined for the ~~broker~~three and, ~~therefore,~~sixth ~~varies~~month ~~monthly~~periods ~~according~~ending toJune 30, ~~interest~~2006 ~~rates,~~compared ~~trading~~to ~~performance~~the three and ~~redemptions.~~sixth ~~Interest~~month ~~income~~periods ~~increased~~ending $5June 30,~~000~~ ~~and~~2005 ~~$6,000~~due ~~during~~to ~~Second~~the ~~Quarter~~effect ~~2005~~of ~~and~~redemptions ~~Year-To-Date~~during 2005 ~~as compared to Second Quarter 2004~~ and Year-Toto-Date ~~2004~~2006, ~~due~~in addition to ~~higher~~negative ~~interest~~trading ~~rates~~performance ~~during~~between July 1, 2005 asand ~~compared~~June 30, ~~to 2004 offset in part by a decrease in average net assets~~2006.

~~Commissions~~Interest ~~are~~income ~~calculated~~is earned on Series A’s average net ~~asset~~assets held ~~value~~ at the ~~end~~broker ~~of each week~~ and, therefore, ~~vary~~varies monthly according to ~~weekly~~interest rates, trading performance and redemptions. ~~Commissions~~ ~~decreased~~Interest income increased approximately $375,000 and $8711,000 during Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006 and Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006, as compared to Second Quarter ~~2004~~2005 and Year-To-Date ~~2004,~~2005 due to ~~the~~higher interest rates during Second Quarter 2006 and Year-To-Date 2006 as compared to Second Quarter 2005 and Year-To-Date 2005 offset in part by a decrease in average net ~~asset~~assets ~~levels.~~as discussed above.

~~All~~Brokerage ~~trading~~commissions ~~decisions for Series A~~ are ~~made by Campbell & Company, Inc. Management fees are~~ calculated on Series A’s net asset value at the end of each week and, therefore, ~~are~~vary ~~affected~~according byto weekly trading performance and redemptions. ~~Management~~Other transaction fees consist of National Futures Association, exchange, clearing fees, as well as floor brokerage costs and give-up charges, which are based on the number of trades the trading advisor executes, as well as which exchange, clearing firm or bank on, or through, which the contract is traded. Brokerage commissions and other transaction fees decreased approximately $916,000 and $2229,000 during Second Quarter ~~2005~~2006 and Year-To-Date ~~2005~~2006, as compared to Second Quarter ~~2004~~2005 and Year-To-Date ~~2004,~~2005 due to the decrease in average net asset levels as discussed above.

~~Incentive~~All ~~fees~~trading ~~are~~decisions ~~based~~for onSeries ~~the~~A ~~“New~~are ~~High Net Trading Profits” generated~~ made by ~~the~~Campbell & ~~Trading Advisor~~Company, ~~are~~Inc. ~~accrued~~Management ~~weekly~~fees ~~and~~ are ~~ultimately~~calculated ~~determined~~on asSeries ofA’s ~~the~~net ~~close~~asset ofvalue ~~business~~at on the ~~last~~end ~~Friday~~ of each ~~calendar~~ ~~quarter~~week and, astherefore, ~~defined~~are inaffected ~~the~~by ~~advisory~~weekly ~~agreement~~trading ~~among~~performance ~~Series A, the Managing Owner~~ and ~~the Trading Advisor~~redemptions. ~~The~~Management ~~incentive~~fees ~~fee~~decreased inapproximately ~~the~~$5,000 and ~~amount of (~~$98,000) ~~for~~during ~~the~~Second Quarter 2006 and Year-To-Date ~~2004 represents the reversal of a December 31~~2006, ~~2003~~as ~~accrual~~compared ~~for~~to ~~the incentive~~Second ~~fee~~Quarter ~~measurement~~2005 ~~period~~and ~~beginning~~Year-To-Date ~~December~~2005 ~~27,~~due ~~2003~~to (the ~~start~~decrease ofin ~~the~~average ~~new~~net ~~quarter~~asset ~~for~~levels ~~incentive~~as ~~fee~~discussed ~~purposes) through March 26, 2004 (end of the quarter for incentive fee purposes)~~above. ~~Incentive fee expenses of $21,000 were incurred during Year-To-Date 2005.~~

Incentive fees are based on the “New High Net Trading Profits” generated by the Trading Advisor, are accrued weekly and are ultimately determined as of the close of business on the last Friday of each calendar quarter, as defined in the advisory agreement among Series A, the Managing Owner and the Trading Advisor. Incentive fees were approximately $40 and $7,300 during Second Quarter 2006 and Year-To-Date 2006. Incentive fees were approximately $21,000 during Second Quarter 2005 and Year-To-Date 2005.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Information regarding quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is not required pursuant to item 305(e) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Managing Owner carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the officers of the Managing Owner, including the Managing Owner’s co-chief executive officer, ~~and~~ chief financial officer and director of fund administration, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Series A’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the evaluation, the Managing Owner’s co-chief executive officer, ~~and~~ chief financial officer and director of fund administration concluded that Series A’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

In designing and evaluating Series A’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act), the Managing Owner recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurances of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and the Managing Owner necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. We believe that our disclosure controls and procedures provide such reasonable assurance.

There have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

5PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

~~PART~~Item II1. ~~OTHER~~Legal ~~INFORMATION~~Proceedings – There are no material legal proceedings pending by or against Series A or the Managing Owner, or for which Series A or Managing Owner was a party during the period covered by this report.

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings – There are no material legal proceedings pending by or against the Registrant or the Managing Owner, or for which the Registrant or Managing Owner was a party during the period covered by this report.
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds – None
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None
Item 5.	Other Information – None
Item 6.	Exhibits:
	3.1
	and
	4.1	Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreements of World Monitor Trust dated as of October 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)
	31.1	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)
	31.2	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)
	32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
	32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)

Item 1.A.

Risk Factors – There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in Series A’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

6Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds – None

-26-

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None

Item 5.

Other Information – None

Item 6.

Exhibits:

3.1

and

4.1

Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreements of World Monitor Trust dated as of October 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)

31.1

Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)

31.2

Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)

31.3

Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)

32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)

32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)

32.3

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)

-27-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	WORLD MONITOR TRUST – SERIES A
By:	Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. Managing Owner
	Managing Owner
	By:	/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer	Date: August 14, 2006
	By:	/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer	Date: August 8, 2005
		Kenneth A. Shewer
		Chairman and Director
		Co-Chief Executive Officer
	By:	/s/ Maureen D. Howley	Date: August 814, ~~2005~~2006
		Maureen D. Howley
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
	By:	/s/ David K. Spohr	Date: August 14, 2006
		David K. Spohr
		Vice President and Director of Fund Administration

Filing Compare · WORLD MONITOR TRUST SERIES A