SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF ~~THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~

~~For~~THE ~~the~~SECURITIES ~~quarterly~~EXCHANGE ~~period~~ACT ~~ended~~OF ~~December 31,~~1934 ~~2004~~

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

Commission file number 0-10691

DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Minnesota		41-1392000
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
12500 Whitewater Drive
Minnetonka, Minnesota		55343-9420
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

6100 West 110^th Street

Bloomington, Minnesota

55438-2664

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(952) 939-9000

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Not Applicable

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ x No ¨ o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date. As of February 11, 2005, there were 6,306,000 shares outstanding of Common Stock.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

As of August 10, 2006, there were 6,422,297 shares outstanding of Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share.

DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Condensed consolidated balance sheets — December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004 Condensed consolidated statements of operations — Three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows — Three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure of Market Risk Item 4. Controls and Procedures PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 2. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities Item 5. Other Information Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K SIGNATURES CERTIFICATIONS Amendment No. 4 to Loan and Security Agreement Amending Agreement No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement Certification Pursuant to Section 302 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 Certification Pursuant to Section 906


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

	Condensed consolidated balance sheets – June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005	3

	Condensed consolidated statements of operations – Three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005	4

	Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows – Nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005	5

	Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	20

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		21

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	21

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	21

Item 6.	Exhibits	21

SIGNATURES		23

CERTIFICATIONS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			September 30,
	June 30, 2006			September 30,2005
	2004			2004
	(In thousands)
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~724~~779		$	~~1,314~~736
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $242 and $247 as of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004 respectively		8,403			7,897
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $252 and $174 as of June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively		6,305			6,615
Inventory		2018,~~785~~895			2119,~~710~~470
Other current assets		21,~~117~~774			2,~~389~~000
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		3227,~~029~~753			3328,~~310~~821
Equipment and fixtures, net		21,~~140~~647			21,~~368~~454
TOTAL ASSETS	$	34,169		$	35,678
Other non-current assets		130			125
TOTAL ASSETS	$	29,530		$	30,400
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	3,~~664~~356		$	53,~~609~~233
Accrued expenses		4,605			3,534
Accrued compensation		2,782			1,512
Income taxes payable		27			264
Other accrued expenses		1,080			910
Current portion of bank credit facilities		~~815~~5,753			~~1,266~~193
Current portion of capital leases		~~102~~96			99106
Deferred revenue		591			468
Customer deposits		33			1,006
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		9,804			11,240
Deferred revenue		371			305
Long-term portion of bank credit facilities and 7% convertible subordinated notes		7,774			7,738
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		13,471			7,265
Long-term portion of capital leases		153			179
Long-term portion of bank credit facilities and 7% convertible subordinated notes		2,408			5,989
TOTAL LIABILITIES		17,731			19,157
Long-term portion of capital leases		2			74
TOTAL LIABILITIES		15,881			13,328
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock — par value $0.10 per share — authorized 50,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 6,287 and 6,271 as of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004, respectively		629			627
Common stock - par value $0.10 per share - authorized 50,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 6,403 and 6,339 as of June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively		640			634
Additional paid-in capital		1819,~~839~~267			1819,~~774~~011
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(~~342~~514	)		(~~711~~710	)
Accumulated deficit		(25,~~688~~744	)		(21,~~169~~863	)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		1613,~~438~~649			1617,~~521~~072
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	3429,~~169~~530		$	3530,~~678~~400

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months Ended
	Three Months EndedJune 30,					Nine Months EndedJune 30,
	December 31,
	2006			2005		2006			2005
	2004			2003
	(In thousands, except per share data)
	(In thousands, except share data)
	(Unaudited)
	(Unaudited)
Sales:
Sales:
Maintenance, spares and supplies	$	10,949		$	12,210	$	32,252		$	35,058
Maintenance, spares and supplies	$	11,588		$	12,124
Printing equipment		411			942		4,691			3,911
Printing equipment		1,382			2,119
NET SALES		11,360			13,152		36,943			38,969
NET SALES		12,970			14,243
Cost of sales		6,411			5,746		18,242			17,702
Cost of sales		6,287			6,711
GROSS PROFIT		4,949			7,406		18,701			21,267
GROSS PROFIT		6,683			7,532
Operating Expenses:
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		6,760			5,537		17,876			16,980
Selling, general and administrative		5,746			5,570
Research and development		1,305			1,195		3,661			3,277
Research and development		1,069			1,254
OPERATING EXPENSES		8,065			6,732		21,537			20,257
		6,815			6,824
(LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		(3,116	)		674		(2,836	)		1,010
(LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		(132	)		708
Net interest expense		265			241		761			769
Net interest expense		259			195
Net realized exchange loss		84			59		386			176
Net realized exchange loss		171			56
Net unrealized exchange (gain) loss		(28	)		74		(102	)		(2	)
Net unrealized exchange (gain) loss		(55	)		22
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(3,437	)		300		(3,881	)		67
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(507	)		435
Income tax (benefit) expense		(26	)		12		—			36
Income tax expense		12			75
NET (LOSS) INCOME	$	(3,411	)	$	288	$	(3,881	)	$	31
NET (LOSS) INCOME	$	(519	)	$	360
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.53	)	$	0.05	$	(0.61	)	$	0.00
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.08	)	$	0.06
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period:
Basic		6,393			6,323		6,374			6,305
Basic		6,287			6,215
Diluted		6,393			6,349		6,374			6,361
Diluted		6,287			6,264

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Three Months Ended
	Nine Months EndedJune 30,
	December 31,
	2006			2005
	2004			2003
	(In thousands)
	(Unaudited)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss) income	$	(~~519~~3,881	)	$	~~360~~31
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		~~287~~702			~~361~~838
Non-cash interst on 7% convertible subordinated notes		148			—
Loss on disposal of equipment and fixtures		15			—
Loss on disposal of equipment and fixtures		—			137
Non-cash interest on 7% convertible subordinated notes:
Other		19			(211	)
Amortization of original issue discount		265			253
Issuance of common stock		137			170
Stock-based compensation		125			—
Other		(12	)		57
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		~~(261~~310	)		~~462~~45
Inventory		~~1,081~~575			~~(72~~2,347	)
Other current assets		~~334~~234			~~(261~~493	)
Notes receivable from customers		—			(114	)
Equipment inventory capitalized for internal use		(602	)		—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,194	)		746
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, deposits and other		589			(2,762	)
Deferred revenue		~~111~~66			~~105~~(19	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		6			1,513
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(1,477	)		1,453
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of equipment and fixtures		(56310	)		(~~172~~162	)
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments		—			43
Proceeds from sale of equipment and fixtures		3			—
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(56307	)		(~~129~~162	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock for interest on 7% convertible subordinated notes		67			—
Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options		—			7
Repayment on bank credit facilities, net		(625	)		(2,000	)
Additional borrowing (repayment) on bank credit facilities, net		1,714			(1,684	)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(2382	)		(1073	)
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(581	)		(2,010	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		1,632			(1,750	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		41195			5216
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(590	)		(574	)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		43			(443	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		~~1,314~~736			21,~~670~~314
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	~~724~~779		$	~~2,096~~871

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1. Interim Financial Statements

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not ~~include~~ include all of the information and footnotes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, consisting of normal recurring accruals, have been included.

Interim unaudited financial results should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated ~~financial~~ financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2004~~2005. Reclassifications have been made in the prior year to conform to classifications in the current year.

The results of ~~operation~~operations for the three and nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2004~~2006 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

Preparation of ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related ~~revenues~~ net sales and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Inventory

As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2004~~2006 and ~~2003~~September 30, 2005, inventory was comprised as follows:

	December 31,			September 30,
	June 30, 2006		September 30, 2005
	2004			2004
	(In thousands)
	(In thousands)
Raw materials and component parts	$	12,514	$	12,662
Raw materials and component parts	$	10,904		$	11,093
Work-in-progress		1,555		1,237
Work-in-progress		1,184			1,156
Finished goods		4,826		5,571
Finished goods		8,697			9,461
	$	18,895	$	19,470
	$	20,785		$	21,710

6 New Pronouncement – Inventory Costs

~~Table~~Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted Statement of ~~Contents~~Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, Inventory Costs (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amended prior guidance on the recognition of inventory costs to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). Prior guidance indicated that under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges. SFAS 151 requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, SFAS 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The adoption of this Statement had no material impact on the valuation of inventory or operating results for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006.

3.6 ~~Earnings per Share~~

TheTable following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss and earnings per share: Contents

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2004			2003
	(In thousands, except share data)
Numerator:
Numerator for basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(519	)	$	360
Dilutive potential loss, Convertible Notes		—			—
Numerator for diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(519	)	$	360
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings and loss per share, weighted average shares		6,287			6,215
Dilutive potential common shares:
Employee stock options		—			49
Warrants		—			—
Convertible Notes		—			—
Dilutive potential common share:		—			49
Denominator for diluted earnings and loss per share, adjusted weighted average shares		6,287			6,264
(Loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.08	)	$	0.06
(Loss) earnings per common share, assuming dilution	$	(0.08	)	$	0.06

3. Loss or Earnings per Share

~~For~~The ~~the~~following ~~first~~table ~~quarter~~sets offorth ~~fiscal~~the ~~2005,~~computation ~~a dilutive potential loss~~ of ~~$65,000~~basic ~~related to Convertible Notes,~~ and ~~dilutive~~diluted ~~potential~~loss ~~common~~or ~~shares~~earnings ~~related~~per toshare: ~~employee stock options of 64,000, warrants of 16,000 and Convertible Notes of 938,000 were excluded because their effect would be antidilutive.~~

4. Comprehensive Income


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005		2006			2005
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Numerator for basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(3,411	)	$	288	$	(3,881	)	$	31
Dilutive potential loss, Convertible Notes		—			—		—			—

Numerator for diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(3,411	)	$	288	$	(3,881	)	$	31

Denominator:
Denominator for basic (loss) earnings per share, weighted average shares		6,393			6,323		6,374			6,305

Dilutive potential shares:
Employee stock options		—			26		—			46
Warrants		—			—		—			10
Convertible Notes		—			—		—			—

Dilutive potential shares		—			26		—			56

Denominator for diluted (loss) earnings per share, weighted average shares		6,393			6,349		6,374			6,361

(Loss) earnings per share - basic	$	(0.53	)	$	0.05	$	(0.61	)	$	0.00

(Loss) earnings per share - diluted	$	(0.53	)	$	0.05	$	(0.61	)	$	0.00

~~The~~Dilutive ~~components~~potential losses related to Convertible Notes were excluded from calculation of ~~comprehensive~~the numerator for diluted loss or earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive. The amounts excluded for the three and ~~income~~nine months ended June 30, ~~net~~2006 and the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005 were $139,000, $402,000, $137,000 and $423,000, respectively. Similarly, dilutive potential common shares were excluded from calculation of the denominator because the effect would be antidilutive. Shares excluded related ~~tax,~~to employee stock options for the three and nine months ended ~~December~~ June 3130, 2006 ~~2004~~were 26,000 and ~~2003~~16,000, respectively. Shares excluded related to Warrants for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 were aszero. ~~follows:~~In all periods, 938,000 shares related to the Convertible Notes were excluded from calculation of the denominator because of their antidilutive effect.

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2004			2003
	(In thousands)
Net (loss) income	$	(519	)	$	360
Foreign currency translation adjustment		369			418
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(150	)	$	778

Options to purchase shares of Common Stock and Warrants were excluded from calculation of the denominator for diluted loss or earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive due to the fact that exercise prices were greater than the average market prices of the common shares for those periods. Shares excluded related to employee stock options for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 and the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005 were 539,000, 697,000, 458,000 and 303,000, respectively. In all periods, 516,000 shares related to Warrants were excluded from calculation of the denominator because of their antidilutive effect.

54. ~~Accounting~~Comprehensive ~~for~~Loss ~~Stock-Based~~or ~~Compensation~~ Income

WeThe ~~account~~components for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations. We have adopted the disclosure-only provisions of ~~Statement~~comprehensive ofloss ~~Financial~~or Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123) as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148). Pro forma net income ~~and loss, and earnings and loss per share, determined as if we had accounted~~ for ~~employee stock options under~~ the ~~fair~~three ~~value~~and ~~method~~nine ~~of those Statements, for the three~~ months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2004~~2006 and ~~2003~~2005 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Nine Months EndedJune 30,
	December 31,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	2004			2003
	(In thousands)
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net (loss) income	$	(3,411	)	$	288		$	(3,881	)	$	31
Net (loss) income, as reported	$	(519	)	$	360
Foreign currency translation adjustment		214			(283	)		196			107
Stock-based compensation determined under fair value based method for all awards		(44	)		(52	)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(3,197	)	$	5		$	(3,685	)	$	138
Pro forma net (loss) income, assuming fair value method for all stock-based awards	$	(563	)	$	308
Basic (loss) earnings per share, as reported	$	(0.08	)	$	0.06
Diluted (loss) earnings per share, as reported		(0.08	)		0.06
Basic (loss) earnings per share, pro forma		(0.09	)		0.05
Diluted (loss) earnings per share, pro forma		(0.09	)		0.05

~~New~~5. ~~Pronouncement~~ Senior Credit Facilities and Convertible Subordinated Debt

~~The~~Our ~~Financial~~debt ~~Accounting~~primarily ~~Standards~~consists ~~Board~~of ~~(FASB) issued~~senior ~~Statement~~credit offacilities ~~Financial~~totaling ~~Accounting~~approximately ~~Standards No~~$13. ~~123~~7 ~~(revised~~million ~~2004),~~and ~~Share-Based~~7% ~~Payment~~convertible ~~(SFAS~~subordinated ~~123~~notes (~~R)),~~the onConvertible ~~December 16,~~Notes) ~~2004~~of $3.0 million. ~~This~~The ~~statement requires~~senior ~~compensation~~credit ~~cost~~facilities, ~~relating~~which toprohibit ~~share-based~~the payment ~~transactions~~of todividends, beare ~~recognized~~secured inby ~~a company~~substantially all of the Company’s ~~financial statements~~assets. The ~~cost~~Convertible ~~will~~Notes beare ~~measured~~unsecured ~~based~~and onjunior to the ~~fair~~senior ~~value~~credit offacilities, ~~the~~with ~~equity~~interest orpayable in ~~liability~~the ~~instruments~~form of 16,406 shares of Common Stock per quarter, which is expensed based on the ~~date~~average ~~they~~market ~~are~~price ~~issued.~~of ~~SFAS~~the ~~123(R)~~Common ~~covers~~Stock aover ~~wide~~the ~~range~~interest ofperiod. ~~share-based compensation~~Original ~~arrangements,~~issue ~~including~~discount ~~share~~on ~~options~~the Convertible Notes, ~~restricted~~approximately ~~share~~$1.4 ~~plans~~million at issue, ~~performance-based~~is being ~~awards,~~amortized ~~share~~to ~~appreciation~~interest ~~rights~~expense ~~and~~over ~~employee~~the ~~share~~four-year ~~purchase~~life ~~plans~~of the Convertible Notes.

WeOur ~~will~~senior becredit ~~required~~financing has both a U.S. and Canadian component. The U.S. component consists of a secured three-year term loan of $114,000 and a secured three-year revolving credit facility of up to ~~adopt~~$8.5 ~~SFAS~~million, ~~123(R)~~subject into ~~the~~a ~~first~~borrowing ~~fiscal~~base ~~period~~of ~~beginning~~accounts ~~after~~receivable ~~June 15~~and inventory and certain financial covenants. The Canadian component consists of a secured, ~~2005~~three-year term loan of $1,042,000 and a secured three-year revolving credit facility of up to $4.0 million, subject to a borrowing base of inventory and certain financial covenants. The senior credit facilities total approximately $13.7 million. In March 2006, our ~~fourth~~credit agreements were amended to extend the three-year term by three months to April 2007. In August 2006, effective for our third quarter of fiscal ~~2005.~~2006, Weour credit agreements were amended to revise the tangible net worth, debt service coverage and interest coverage covenants, covenants that, as previously agreed, we would have ~~not~~failed ~~completed~~as ~~our evaluation~~a result of ~~SFAS~~the ~~123~~magnitude of the net loss incurred for the quarter. In addition, the lender: (Ri), ~~but~~waived the ~~adoption~~other ofcovenants ~~this~~that ~~new~~were ~~standard~~violated ~~may~~during ~~have~~the quarter; (ii) added a ~~significant~~cash ~~impact~~flow oncovenant ~~our~~for ~~financial~~the ~~results~~fourth ~~due~~quarter of fiscal 2006, limiting cash flow as defined in the agreement to not less than negative $1.4 million; and ~~use~~(iii) reduced ofour ~~stock~~availability ~~options~~under asthe ~~employee~~agreements ~~incentives~~by $500,000. The availability of revolving credit under the senior credit facilities is based primarily on our accounts receivable and inventory levels, but also on compliance with these covenants, as amended.

6The senior credit agreements provide for interest rates ranging from Canadian prime plus 1.75% ~~Senior~~to ~~Credit~~plus ~~Facilities~~2.25%, ~~and~~to ~~Convertible~~U.S. ~~Subordinated~~prime ~~Debt~~plus 0.25% to plus 1%, depending on the calculated debt service coverage ratio. Because the Company’s debt service coverage ratio was less than 1:1 as of June 30, 2006, the highest interest rates will apply to our outstanding debt beginning in the quarter ending September 30, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, the interest rates applicable to our loans were 8.25% and 9.0% for our Canadian and U.S. revolving loans, respectively, and 9.25% for our term loans.

~~Our~~The subordinated debt financing consists of ~~senior~~a ~~credit~~private ~~facilities~~placement ~~totaling~~to ~~approximately~~an ~~$13.7 million~~accredited ~~and~~investor of $3.0 million in 7% convertible subordinated notes (the Convertible Notes). and ~~The~~accompanying ~~senior~~four-year ~~credit~~warrants ~~facilities~~to ~~are secured~~purchase by515,625 ~~substantially~~shares ~~all~~ of ~~the~~ Company’s ~~assets.~~Common ~~The~~Stock ~~Convertible~~at ~~Notes~~an ~~are~~exercise ~~unsecured~~price ~~and junior~~of to$3.51 ~~the~~per ~~senior~~share ~~credit~~(the ~~facilities,~~Warrants). ~~with~~The ~~interest~~Convertible ~~payable~~Notes inare ~~the~~immediately ~~form~~convertible ofto ~~16,406~~Company ~~shares of~~ Common Stock ~~per~~at ~~quarter,~~a ~~which~~conversion isprice ~~expensed~~of ~~based~~$3.20 per onshare, ~~the~~which ~~average~~would ~~market~~result ~~price~~in of937,500 ~~the~~shares ~~Common~~being ~~Stock over~~issued ~~the~~if ~~interest~~all ~~period~~$3.0 ~~Original~~million ~~issue~~in ~~discount~~principal onof the Convertible Notes, ~~approximately~~are ~~$1.4 million~~converted at ~~issue,~~that isconversion ~~being~~price. ~~amortized~~The toConvertible ~~interest~~Notes ~~expense~~are ~~over~~junior to the ~~four-year~~senior ~~life~~credit offacilities ~~the~~described ~~Convertible~~above, bear ~~Notes.~~ interest at the

~~The~~rate ~~senior~~of ~~credit~~7% per ~~agreement~~annum, ~~was~~payable ~~amended~~quarterly in ~~February 2005~~shares of Common Stock, ~~revising~~and ~~certain~~principal ~~ratios~~is due and ~~providing~~payable ~~for~~in one lump sum ain ~~temporary~~four ~~increase~~years on February 4, 2008, unless earlier paid or converted. The number of shares of Common Stock to be issued in payment of interest was determined by dividing the monetary value of the accrued interest ~~rates~~by ~~applicable~~the toinitial conversion price of $3.20 per common share, or 16,406 shares per quarter. Interest expense is recorded quarterly based on the ~~loan~~fair value of the common shares issued and the average market price of the Common Stock over the interest period. Accordingly, ~~ranging~~interest expense may fluctuate from ~~0.25%~~quarter to 0quarter. The Convertible Notes are unsecured. The Warrants issued in connection with the Convertible Notes are exercisable anytime after August 5%, ~~when~~2004 and expire on February 4, 2008. The conversion ~~ratios~~price ~~fall~~of ~~outside~~the Convertible Notes and the exercise price of the Warrants are subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, dividends and in certain ~~parameters~~other circumstances affecting the capitalization of the Company. The relative fair value of the Warrants on February 5, 2004 was estimated to be approximately $561,000. Furthermore, the Convertible Notes contain a beneficial conversion feature representing an effective initial conversion price that was less than the fair value of the underlying Common Stock on February 5, 2004. The fair value of the beneficial conversion feature was estimated to be approximately $852,000. Both the relative fair value of the Warrants and the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature were recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and as original issue discount on the underlying debt. The total original issue discount of approximately $1.4 million is being amortized to interest expense over the four-year life of the Convertible Notes. Anytime after February 4, 2006, if the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock has been above $7.00 per share for the preceding 15 trading days and certain other conditions are met, the Company may issue a notice to redeem the Convertible Notes. Holders of the Convertible Notes would then be required to either convert the Convertible Notes to Common Stock or accept payment of 120% of the outstanding unpaid principal.

~~The~~Our ~~availability~~subsidiaries ofin ~~revolving credit under~~ the ~~senior~~United ~~credit~~Kingdom ~~facilities is based primarily on our accounts receivable~~ and ~~inventory~~France ~~levels,~~have ~~but~~lines ~~also on compliance with certain covenants, one~~ of ~~which~~ iscredit ~~a tangible net worth covenant. It is our intent to meet this and all the covenants~~ of ~~the agreements~~£100,000 and we monitor prospective compliance with the bank covenants. If we determined that revenue shortfalls or other operating results indicate that we may not meet the tangible net worth covenant or any other covenant€50,000, werespectively ~~will~~(approximately ~~initiate expense reduction plans to achieve compliance with the covenants. We have developed specific plans to reduce certain expenses in the event of covenant non-compliance~~$184,000 and ~~the plans include~~$63, ~~but may not be limited to~~000, ~~reductions in research~~ ~~and~~respectively, ~~development~~at ~~costs~~June 30, ~~and~~2006 ~~personnel~~exchange ~~costs~~rates). WeThese ~~believe~~lines ~~that~~of ~~our~~credit ~~plans~~have tonot ~~reduce~~been ~~expenses will be sufficient in order to meet the covenants at all scheduled measurement dates throughout fiscal 2005~~used.

As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2004~~2006, there was $65.7 8 million of indebtedness under the senior credit facilities, outstanding at an approximate average annual interest rate of 58.57%. The weighted average interest rate on all of the Company’s debt was approximately 1012.02%, which gives effect to the senior credit facilities and the $3.0 million of Convertible Notes. Total interest expense on all debt includes both interest paid or accrued in cash and non-cash interest expense, comprised of the amortization of the original issue discount of approximately $1.4 million over the four-year term of the Convertible Notes and the value of the Company’s Common Stock issued in payment of interest and expensed at the average market price of the stock over the interest period.

76. ~~New~~Stock-based ~~Pronouncement~~Compensation ~~— Inventory Costs~~

InCommencing ~~November~~October ~~2004~~1, ~~the~~2005, ~~FASB~~we adopted ~~issued~~ Statement of Financial Accounting ~~Standards~~Standard No. ~~151, Inventory Costs~~ 123(~~SFAS 151~~R)., ~~The~~Share ~~provisions~~Based ofPayment ~~this statement become effective for the Company in fiscal 2006.~~ (SFAS ~~151 amends the existing guidance on the recognition of inventory costs to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material~~ 123(~~spoilage~~R).), ~~Existing~~which ~~rules~~requires ~~indicate~~all ~~that~~share-based ~~under some circumstances~~payments, ~~items~~including ~~such~~grants asof ~~idle~~stock ~~facility expense~~options, ~~excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as~~ to ~~require treatment as current period charges. SFAS 151 requires that those items~~ be recognized asin ~~current period charges regardless of whether they meet~~ the ~~criterion~~statement of ~~“so~~operations ~~abnormal”.~~as Inan ~~addition~~operating expense, ~~SFAS 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be~~ based on ~~the~~ ~~normal~~their ~~capacity~~fair ofvalue ~~the~~over ~~production facilities. The adoption of this Statement is not expected to have a material impact on~~ the ~~valuation~~requisite ofservice ~~inventory or operating results~~period.

9As a result of adoption of SFAS 123(R), our financial results were lower than under our previous accounting method for share-based compensation by the following amounts:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2006		Nine Months Ended June 30, 2006
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes	$	23	$	125
Income from continuing operations		23		125
Net income		23		125

Basic and diluted net income per share	$	0.00	$	0.02

~~Item~~9 ~~2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition~~

TheTable following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read together with the other financial information and Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in “Factors Affecting Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report. Contents

~~Overview~~For the three months ended June 30, 2006, $19,000, $3,000 and $1,000 were expensed to selling, general and administrative, research and development and indirect manufacturing expense, respectively. For the nine months ended June 30, 2006, $113,000, $10,000 and $2,000 were expensed to selling, general and administrative, research and development and indirect manufacturing expense, respectively. Because we expect to incur no income tax expense for fiscal 2006, there were no effects of adopting SFAS 123(R) included in cash flows from financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2006.

~~The~~As ~~Company’s~~of ~~business~~June 30, ~~is the design~~2006, ~~manufacture~~$283,000 ~~sale and servicing~~ of ~~advanced~~total ~~digital~~unrecognized ~~print production~~compensation ~~equipment~~costs ~~based~~related onto its patented electron beam imaging (EBI) technology. A majority of our revenue is from the sale of maintenance contracts, spare parts and supplies that are used with this equipment. The equipment includes both “rollnon-~~fed”~~vested orstock ~~“web”~~option ~~presses~~awards ~~(the CR Series and RS Series) where the paper input~~ is onexpected ~~rolls,~~to ~~and~~be ~~“cut-sheet” or “sheet-fed” printers and presses (the~~recognized ~~Imaggia~~over ~~and~~a ~~the~~weighted ~~legacy~~average ~~Chectronic~~period ~~system)~~of ~~that~~approximately ~~use~~3 ~~pre-cut sheets or paper or base stock~~years.

~~For~~Prior ~~the~~to ~~first~~adopting ~~quarter~~SFAS of123(R), ~~fiscal~~we ~~2005~~accounted ~~(the~~for ~~three~~stock-based ~~months~~compensation ~~ended~~under ~~December~~Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 3125, ~~2004),~~Accounting ~~our~~for ~~revenues~~Stock ~~were improved~~Issued ~~over~~to Employees. We have applied the ~~immediately~~modified ~~preceding~~prospective ~~quarter,~~method ~~but~~in ~~were~~adopting ~~lower~~SFAS ~~than~~123(R). ~~for~~Accordingly, ~~the~~periods ~~same~~prior ~~quarter~~to aadoption ~~year ago.~~have ~~The~~not ~~gross~~been ~~margin~~restated. ~~decreased~~The ~~slightly~~following ~~for~~table illustrates the ~~first~~effect ~~quarter~~on ofnet ~~fiscal~~income ~~2005,~~and ~~compared~~loss ~~with~~and ~~the same~~net ~~quarter~~earnings ~~last~~and ~~year,~~loss ~~primarily~~per ~~due~~share toif ~~unabsorbed~~the ~~overhead~~fair ~~from~~value ~~lower~~based ~~equipment~~method ~~production~~had ~~levels in~~been applied to the ~~current~~prior ~~year~~periods: ~~period.~~

Operating expenses were flat year to year. The $132,000 loss from operations and increased interest expense and foreign currency exchange losses in the current year combined to result in a loss of $519,000 or $0.08 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2005, compared with earnings of $360,000 or $0.06 per share for the corresponding quarter a year ago.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005		Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income, as reported	$	288	$	31
Stock-based compensation determined under fair value based method for all awards		42		147

Pro forma net income (loss), assuming fair value method for all stock-based awards	$	246	$	(116	)

Basic earnings per share, as reported	$	0.05	$	0.00
Diluted earnings per share, as reported		0.05		0.00
Basic earnings (loss) per share, pro forma		0.04		(0.02	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share, pro forma		0.04		(0.02	)

~~Critical~~We ~~Accounting~~use ~~Policies~~the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted average fair value of options. The weighted average fair values of options granted during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 and the nine months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, were $34,000, $190,000 and $243,000. There were no options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2005. The assumptions we used to determine fair value were as follows:

We have prepared Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition, which discusses the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition, inventory, allowance for doubtful accounts and income taxes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.


	Three Months Ended	Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2006	June 30, 2006	June 30, 2005
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%	0%
Expected stock price volatility	58%	58%	50%
Risk-free interest rate	4.4%	4.4%	4.1%
Expected life of options	4.75 years	4.75 years	7 years

We10 ~~believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

RevenueTable Recognition of Contents

~~Our~~The ~~printing~~Company’s ~~equipment~~stock ~~systems~~options ~~are~~generally ~~tested~~vest atover ~~our~~four ~~facility~~years ~~prior~~of toservice ~~shipment,~~ and wehave ~~recognize revenue~~a ~~related~~contractual tolife ~~orders~~of ~~shipped~~7 ~~under~~years. ~~standard~~At ~~performance conditions when systems are shipped.~~the ~~Systems~~beginning ~~shipped~~of ~~subject~~fiscal to2006, ~~non-standard~~we ~~contractual~~had ~~performance~~216,000, ~~conditions~~257,000 ~~such~~and ~~as financing approval or special print applications~~780,000 ~~are~~shares ~~recognized~~authorized asfor ~~revenue~~grant ~~upon~~under ~~completion or attainment of~~ the ~~specified~~1991 ~~condition.~~Stock WePlan, ~~recognize~~the ~~service~~1997 ~~revenue~~Stock asPlan ~~services are rendered. For spare parts~~ and ~~supplies~~the ~~stored~~2000 atStock ~~customer~~Plan ~~sites, we recognize revenue when~~ (the ~~customer~~2000 ~~uses~~Plan), ~~the inventory~~respectively. ~~Amounts~~ ~~billed~~However, tosince ~~customers~~fiscal ~~under~~2003, ~~maintenance~~all ~~contracts~~options ~~are~~have ~~recorded~~been ~~as deferred revenue and~~granted ~~recognized~~under ~~in income over~~ the ~~term~~2000 ~~of the maintenance agreement~~Plan. WeOptions ~~record~~granted ~~revenue~~under ~~for~~the ~~pre-press or~~2000 ~~finishing equipment~~Plan ~~manufactured~~during bythe ~~others~~nine onmonths aended ~~gross~~June 30, ~~basis.~~2006 ~~Freight~~were ~~revenue is recorded on a gross basis and recognized upon shipment. The related freight costs are recorded~~ as ~~costs~~follows: ~~of sales.~~


	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share
	(In thousands)
Options outstanding, September 30, 2005	872		$	3.44
Granted	135			2.68
Excercised	(1	)		2.68
Canceled	(342	)		3.31

Options outstanding, June 30, 2006	664			3.35

~~Table~~The following tables summarize information concerning options outstanding and exercisable as of ~~Contents~~June 30, 2006:

Inventory


Options Outstanding
Range of Exercise Prices		Number of Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share
		(In thousands)
$	1.75 - 4.80	625	3.18 years	$	3.09
	5.06 - 7.75	21	3.33 years		5.99
	9.63 - 9.63	18	0.22 years		9.63

	1.75 - 9.63	664	3.11 years		3.35

We reduce the stated value of our inventory for obsolescence or impairment in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value, based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than we project, additional reductions in stated value may be required.



Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices		Number of Options Exercisable	Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share
		(In thousands)
$	1.75 - 4.80	376	$	3.13
	5.06 - 7.75	21		5.99
	9.63 - 9.63	18		9.63

	1.75 - 9.63	415		3.55

~~Allowance~~ Item 2. ~~for~~Management’s ~~Doubtful~~Discussion ~~Accounts~~ and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

WeThe ~~record~~following andiscussion ~~allowance for doubtful accounts based on identification~~ of ~~specific~~our ~~accounts receivable,~~financial ~~supplemented~~condition byand aresults ~~general allowance~~ of ~~approximately~~operations ~~20%~~should ofbe ~~accounts~~read ~~aged~~together ~~greater~~with ~~than 90 days~~the ~~not~~other ~~otherwise~~financial ~~specifically~~information ~~considered. Specific identification of doubtful accounts~~ and ~~determination~~ ofCondensed ~~the~~Consolidated ~~amount~~Financial ofStatements ~~the~~included ~~required~~in ~~allowance~~this ~~involves~~Quarterly aReport ~~degree~~on ofForm ~~judgment~~10-Q. ~~based on~~This discussion ~~with~~contains ~~our~~forward-looking ~~customer~~statements ~~support~~that ~~and~~involve ~~sales~~risks ~~organization, examination of the financial stability of our customers~~ and ~~review of their payment history~~uncertainties. ~~There~~Our ~~can be no assurance that our estimates will match~~ actual ~~amounts~~results ~~ultimately~~could ~~written~~differ ~~off.~~materially ~~During~~from ~~periods~~those ofanticipated ~~downturn~~ in the ~~market~~forward-looking ~~for printed~~statements ~~materials~~as ora ~~economic~~result ~~recession,~~of a ~~greater~~variety ~~degree~~ of ~~risk~~factors, ~~exists~~including ~~concerning~~those ~~the ultimate~~discussed ~~collectability~~in of“Risk ~~accounts~~Related ~~receivable due~~ to ~~the~~Operations” ~~impact~~and ~~that~~elsewhere ~~these~~in ~~conditions~~this ~~might have on our customer base~~report. ~~We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts quarterly.~~

~~Income~~11 ~~Taxes~~

InTable determining the carrying value of the Company’s net deferred tax assets, we must assess the likelihood of sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions, based on estimates and assumptions, to realize the benefit of these assets. We have fully reserved our net deferred tax assets, totaling $3.2 million and $3.0 million as of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004, respectively, recognizing that the Company has incurred losses in four of the last five fiscal years and there is no assurance that future years will be profitable. If these estimates and assumptions change in the future, we may record a reduction in the valuation allowance, resulting in an income tax benefit in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. We evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets and assess the valuation allowance quarterly. Contents

11 Executive Summary

~~Table~~For the third quarter of ~~Contents~~fiscal 2006, we incurred a net loss of $3.4 million, or $0.53 per share, compared with net income of $0.3 million, or $0.05 per share, for the year-ago quarter. For the nine months ended June 30, 2006, our net loss was $3.9 million, or $0.61 per share, compared with net income of $31,000, or zero per share, for the same period in fiscal 2005. The significant losses for the quarter and the fiscal-year-to-date periods and the significant changes in the net income for the comparable periods were attributable to a number of factors, most significantly the following:

~~Results~~• ofLower ~~Operations~~ net sales volumes and lower-margin sales reduced income for the quarter by approximately $1.6 million and for the nine-month period by approximately $2.8 million for the fiscal 2006 periods, relative to the same periods in fiscal 2005.

~~The~~• ~~following~~Cost ~~table~~of ~~sets~~sales ~~forth~~expenses ~~the~~related ~~Company’s~~to ~~Statements~~production ofat ~~Operations~~levels aslower athan ~~percentage~~normal capacity, lay-off of ~~net~~production ~~sales~~ staff and ~~should~~write-down beof ~~read~~certain ininventory ~~connection~~to ~~with~~market value reduced income for the ~~Condensed~~quarter, ~~Consolidated~~relative ~~Financial~~to ~~Statements~~the ~~and~~same ~~notes thereto~~quarter ~~presented~~a ~~elsewhere~~year inago, ~~this~~by ~~report~~approximately $0. 9 million. However, these costs of sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 were lower by approximately $0.2 million, slightly improving net income compared with the first nine months of fiscal 2005.

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2004			2003
	(Unaudited)
Sales:
Maintenance, spares and supplies		89.3	%		85.1	%
Printing equipment		10.7			14.9
NET SALES		100.0			100.0
Cost of sales		48.5			47.1
GROSS PROFIT		51.5			52.9
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		44.3			39.1
Research and development		8.2			8.8
		52.5			47.9
(LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		(1.0	)		5.0
Net interest expense		2.0			1.4
Net realized exchange loss		1.3			0.4
Net unrealized exchange (gain) loss		(0.4	)		0.2
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(3.9	)		3.0
Income tax expense		0.1			0.5
NET (LOSS) INCOME		(4.0	)%		2.5	%

•

In May 2006, the Company’s chief executive officer left Delphax by mutual agreement with the Board of Directors. Severance (CEO Severance) per the employment agreement resulted in a charge to the Company in the quarter and fiscal-year-to-date periods of approximately $0.7 million.

~~Net~~In ~~Sales.~~fiscal ~~The~~2006, ~~Company’s~~we ~~revenues~~adopted ~~consist~~SFAS 123(R), ofwhich ~~sales~~requires all share-based payments, including grants of ~~(i) maintenance~~stock options, ~~spare~~to ~~parts~~be ~~and~~recognized ~~supplies~~in the statement of operations as an operating expense, based on their fair value over the requisite service period. We recorded compensation expense of $23,000 and ~~(ii) printing~~$125,000, ~~systems~~respectively, in the three and ~~related~~nine ~~equipment~~months ended June 30, 2006. For the ~~first~~three ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~fiscal~~June 30, ~~2005~~2006, ~~net revenues~~$19,000, ~~were~~$3,000 and $131,000 were expensed to selling, general and administrative, research and development and indirect manufacturing expense, respectively.0 For the nine months ended June ~~million~~30, ~~down~~2006, 9%$113,000, ~~from~~$10,000 and $~~14.~~2 ~~million~~,000 ~~for~~were ~~the~~expensed ~~first~~to ~~quarter~~selling, ofgeneral ~~fiscal~~and ~~2004.~~administrative, research and development and indirect manufacturing expense, respectively.

~~For~~Overview the first quarter of fiscal 2005, revenues from maintenance, spare parts and supplies of $11.6 million were down 4% from $12.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2004. We attribute the decrease in revenues to a decline in usage of the Company’s installed base of legacy equipment, offset by increases in OEM business and in CR Series usage. We expect revenues from maintenance, spare parts and supplies to continue to experience downward pressures from attrition of older equipment in the field, until such time as installations of our newer CR Series printing systems are sufficient to reverse this trend.

~~Revenues~~The ~~from~~Company’s business is the design, manufacture, sale and servicing of ~~printing~~advanced digital print production equipment ~~were~~based $1on its patented electron beam imaging (EBI) technology.~~4 million~~ ~~for~~The ~~the~~majority ~~first~~of ~~quarter~~our revenue is from the sale of ~~fiscal 2005~~maintenance contracts, ~~down~~spare ~~35%~~parts and ~~from~~supplies $2that are used with this equipment.~~1 million~~ ~~for~~Our equipment includes both “roll-fed” or “web” presses (the ~~same~~CR ~~period~~Series inand ~~fiscal~~RS Series), where the paper input is on rolls, and “cut-sheet” or ~~2004~~“sheet-fed” printers and presses (the Imaggia and the Checktronic system) that use pre-cut sheets of paper or base stock. Our flagship printing systems ~~primarily~~are ~~consist of~~ the CR Series and the Imaggia ~~The~~presses. The Checktronic and Foliotronic are among the Company’s legacy products. The Checktronic is now sold principally as a system upgrade or refurbished product in Latin America, Asia and Africa. The Foliotronic is still ~~actively~~ actively marketed to customers with folio production applications. ~~The decline in revenues from printing equipment for the first quarter of fiscal 2005, compared with the first quarter of fiscal 2004, was due to lower sales in all product lines except Imaggia.~~

12The Company operates and manages its business in a single business segment – the development and marketing of advanced digital print production equipment. We market our products and services through a direct sales force and independent distributors in the United States and international markets. Our Common Stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol “DLPX.”

~~Table~~Critical ofAccounting ~~Contents~~Policies

~~Gross~~This ~~Margin. The Company~~Management’s ~~gross~~Discussion ~~margin~~and ~~percentage~~Analysis ~~for the first quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~Financial ~~2005~~Condition ~~was~~and ~~52%, compared~~Results ~~with~~of ~~53%~~Operations ~~for~~discusses ~~the~~our ~~first~~Condensed ~~quarter~~Consolidated ofFinancial ~~fiscal~~Statements, ~~2004.~~which ~~The~~have ~~decrease~~been prepared in ~~the~~accordance ~~gross~~with ~~margin percentage~~accounting ~~was~~principles ~~primarily~~generally ~~due~~accepted ~~to unabsorbed labor and overhead costs incurred~~ in the ~~first~~United ~~quarter of fiscal 2005 as a result of reduced equipment production levels~~States. ~~This~~The ~~unfavorable~~preparation ~~variance was partially offset by the greater proportion~~ of ~~fiscal~~these ~~2005~~financial ~~net~~statements ~~sales~~requires ~~derived~~management from maintenance, spare parts and supplies, at margins greater than the margin on equipment sales. In general, we anticipate that the gross margin percentage in fiscal 2005 as a whole will be lower than in fiscal 2004, as we expect full-year fiscal 2005 revenues to bemake ~~derived from a higher proportion of printing equipment revenues at lower margins.~~

~~Selling,~~12 General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses of $5.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 were relatively flat compared with $5.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2004. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 44% for the first quarter of fiscal 2005, compared with 39% for the year-ago quarter, primarily due to lower fiscal 2005 net sales levels.

ResearchTable and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses were $1.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2005, compared with $1.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2004, or 8% and 9% of net sales, respectively. The higher expense in fiscal 2004 was due to development of the CR2000 digital press and print quality enhancements for the CR Series printing systems, introduced to the marketplace in fiscal 2004. Contents

~~Net~~estimates ~~Interest~~and ~~Expense.~~assumptions ~~Net~~that ~~interest~~affect ~~expense for~~ the ~~first~~reported ~~quarter~~amounts of ~~fiscal~~assets ~~2005~~and ~~was~~liabilities ~~$259,000,~~and the disclosure of contingent ~~compared~~assets ~~with~~and ~~$195,000~~liabilities inat ~~fiscal~~the ~~2004.~~date ~~The~~of ~~increase~~the ~~was~~financial ~~primarily~~statements ~~due~~and tothe ~~non-cash~~reported ~~interest~~amounts ~~expense~~ of ~~$148,000~~net ~~related~~sales toand expenses during the ~~Convertible~~reporting ~~Notes~~period. ~~issued~~On ~~in February 2004~~an ongoing basis, ~~partially~~management ~~offset~~evaluates byits ~~the~~estimates ~~lower~~and assumptions, including those related to ~~interest~~revenue recognition, product warranties, inventory, stock-based compensation expense, onallowance ~~senior~~for ~~debt~~doubtful accounts and income taxes. ~~The~~Management ~~average~~bases ~~senior~~its ~~debt~~estimates ~~outstanding~~and ~~was~~judgments ~~lower,~~on ~~but~~historical ~~the~~experience ~~applicable~~and on various other factors that are ~~interest~~believed ~~rates~~to ~~higher,~~be ~~for~~reasonable under the ~~first~~circumstances, ~~quarter~~the results of ~~fiscal~~which ~~2005,~~form ~~compared~~the ~~with~~basis for making judgments about the ~~first~~carrying ~~quarter~~value of ~~fiscal~~ ~~2004~~assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

~~Foreign~~Management ~~Exchange~~believes ~~Gains~~the ~~and~~following ~~Losses.~~critical ~~Delphax~~accounting incurs realized and unrealized transactional foreign exchange gains and losses on currency conversion transactions that are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Realized and unrealized transactional exchange gains and losses reflect actual and anticipatedpolicies, ~~respectively,~~among ~~gains or losses recognized as the result of transactions between entities with different functional currencies. The net transactional exchange losses for the three months ended December 31~~others, ~~2004~~affect ~~and~~its ~~2003~~more ~~were~~significant ~~$116,000~~judgments and ~~$78,000, respectively.~~estimates ~~The~~used ~~Company experiences translational foreign currency gains and losses, which are reflected~~ in ~~equity, with gains due to~~ the ~~weakening,~~preparation ~~and losses due to the strengthening,~~ of the ~~U.S.~~ ~~dollar~~Condensed ~~against~~Consolidated ~~the~~Financial ~~currencies of our foreign subsidiaries and the resulting effect of currency translation on the valuation of the intercompany accounts and certain assets of the subsidiaries, which are denominated in U~~Statements.S. dollars. The functional currency of the Canadian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. We anticipate continuing to have transactional and translational foreign currency gains and losses from foreign operations in the future, although strategies to reduce the size of the gains and losses will be reviewed and implemented whenever economical and practical.

~~Income~~Revenue ~~Taxes.~~Recognition For fiscal 2005, we project that our income tax expense will be comprised of applicable minimum taxes as we anticipate utilizing loss carry-forwards from previous years. Interim income tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 has been recognized on that basis. For the first quarter of fiscal 2004, an interim period income tax expense of $75,000 was recognized based on projected profitable European operations for the fiscal year. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we have fully reserved deferred tax assets of $3.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, recognizing that Delphax has incurred losses in four of the last five fiscal years and there is no assurance that future years will be profitable.

~~Earnings~~Revenue oron ~~Loss~~printing ~~per~~equipment ~~Share~~sales is recognized upon customer acceptance and transfer of risk of loss. ~~For~~Revenue for printing equipment sales is not recognized when the contract ~~first~~includes ~~quarter~~a right of ~~fiscal~~return ~~2005~~until after the expiration of the right. Discounts, ~~basic~~credits and ~~diluted~~other ~~loss~~sales ~~per~~incentive ~~share~~arrangements offered to our customers are accounted for as reductions to revenue at the point the revenue is recognized. ~~was~~Revenue $0for post-shipment obligations, such as training and installation, considered perfunctory as defined under Staff Accounting Bulletin No.08 104, ~~compared~~Revenue ~~with~~Recognition, ~~basic~~is deferred and ~~diluted~~recognized ~~earnings~~as ~~per~~the ~~share~~services ofare $0performed.06 ~~for~~For spare parts and supplies stored at customer sites, we recognize revenue when the ~~first~~customer ~~quarter~~uses the inventory. Amounts billed to customers under maintenance contracts are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized in income over the term of the ~~fiscal~~maintenance ~~2004~~agreement. ~~The~~In ~~decrease~~accordance inwith ~~earnings~~Emerging ~~between~~Issues ~~periods~~Task ~~was~~Force ~~primarily~~Issue ~~attributable~~99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal verses Net as an Agent, as primary obligor to ~~slightly~~the ~~lower~~manufacturer, we record revenue for pre-press or finishing equipment ~~margins~~manufactured by others on ~~lower~~a ~~net~~gross ~~sales,~~basis. ~~coupled~~Freight ~~with~~revenue ~~flat~~is ~~operating~~recorded ~~expenses~~on a gross basis and recognized upon shipment. The related freight costs are recorded as costs of sales.

13 Product Warranties

~~Table~~We provide a limited warranty on our digital presses, certain licensed software and on proprietary spares and supplies. Our standard equipment warranty commences with installation and extends for a period of ~~Contents~~90 days thereafter. Similarly, on proprietary spares and supplies, our warranty is for 90 days from product shipment date. For certain licensed software, we warrant substantial conformance to documented specifications. Warranty reserves are reviewed quarterly and adjustments are made from time to time based on actual claims experience in order to properly estimate the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. While we believe that the warranty reserve is adequate and that the judgment applied is appropriate, such amounts estimated to be due and payable could differ materially from what will actually transpire in the future.

~~Market~~Inventory ~~Risk~~

~~Delphax~~Purchased ~~has~~inventory ~~foreign~~is ~~subsidiaries~~recorded ~~located~~at incost. ~~Canada,~~Manufactured ~~the~~inventory ~~United~~is ~~Kingdom~~recorded ~~and~~at ~~France~~cost based on normal capacity. Idle or excess facility expense, ~~does~~excessive ~~business~~spoilage, indouble freight, rehandling and similar costs are ~~more~~expensed ~~than~~as 60incurred. ~~countries~~We ~~and~~reduce ~~generates~~the ~~approximately~~stated ~~25%~~value of our inventory for obsolescence or impairment in an amount equal to ~~30%~~the difference between the cost of ~~its~~the ~~revenues~~inventory ~~from~~and ~~outside~~the ~~North~~estimated market value, based upon assumptions about future demand and ~~America~~market conditions. ~~Our~~Actual ~~ability~~future todemand ~~sell~~or ~~our~~market ~~products~~conditions infor ~~foreign~~inventory ~~markets~~ may be ~~affected~~more or less favorable than projected by ~~changes~~management, resulting in ~~economic,~~ ~~political~~more or less favorable margins than projected. If actual future demand or market conditions inare ~~the~~less favorable ~~foreign~~than ~~markets~~we project, additional reductions in ~~which~~stated wevalue domay ~~business~~be required.

The parent company’s net investment in its foreign subsidiaries was $7.3 million at December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004, translated into U.S. dollars at the closing exchange rates. The potential loss Stock-based onCompensation ~~end-of-period~~Expense balances and prevailing exchange rates resulting from a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies was not material in the quarter ended December 31, 2004. The functional currency of the Canadian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar.

InCommencing ~~the~~October 1, ~~past~~2005, ~~but~~we ~~not~~adopted inSFAS ~~recent~~123(R), ~~years~~which requires all share-based payments, ~~the~~including ~~Company~~grants ~~has~~of ~~entered~~stock ~~into~~options, ~~foreign~~to ~~exchange~~be ~~contracts~~recognized asin athe statements of ~~hedge~~operations ~~against~~as ~~specific~~an ~~foreign~~operating ~~currency~~expense, ~~receivables.~~based Inon their fair value over the ~~first~~requisite ~~three~~service ~~months~~period. ofWe ~~fiscal~~use ~~2004~~the ~~and 2005,~~Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the ~~Company~~weighted ~~did~~average ~~not~~fair ~~enter~~value ~~into~~of ~~any~~options. ~~foreign~~The ~~exchange~~determination ~~contracts~~of ~~and~~fair ~~does~~value ~~not~~of ~~anticipate~~share-based ~~entering~~payment ~~into~~awards ~~any~~on ~~such~~the ~~contracts~~date inof ~~the~~grant ~~near~~using ~~future.~~ an

~~Interest~~13 ~~Rate Risk~~

SubstantiallyTable all of our senior debt and the associated interest expense are sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in incremental interest expense in the three-month periods ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 of approximately $17,000 and $32,000, respectively. Contents

~~Factors~~option-pricing ~~Affecting~~model ~~Results~~is affected by our stock price as well as by assumptions regarding a number of ~~Operations~~highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

~~The~~Expected ~~Company’s~~stock ~~revenues~~price ~~are~~volatility ~~subject~~was todetermined ~~fluctuations,~~based ~~which~~on ~~may~~the bedaily ~~material.~~stock ~~Our~~price ~~net~~for ~~sales~~Delphax ~~and~~Common Stock beginning March 1, 2002, the earliest trading day for which ~~operating~~information ~~results~~is ~~may~~available ~~fluctuate~~on ~~from~~NASDAQ ~~quarter~~subsequent to ~~quarter~~the ~~because~~acquisition ~~(i)~~ of our ~~sales~~Canadian ~~cycle~~subsidiary, iswhich ~~relatively long,~~substantially ~~(ii)~~ changed the size and complexity of ~~orders~~the ~~may~~Company’s ~~vary~~business. ~~significantly,~~We ~~(iii)~~ believe the ~~availability~~volatility ofduring ~~financing~~this ~~for customers~~period inrepresents ~~some~~the ~~countries~~volatility for isthe ~~variable,~~expected ~~(iv) customers~~life ~~may~~of ~~postpone~~the oroptions. ~~cancel~~The ~~orders,~~risk-free ~~and~~interest ~~(v) economic,~~rate ~~political~~assumption ~~and~~was ~~market~~determined ~~conditions~~based inupon ~~some~~United ~~markets~~States ~~change~~Treasury Strips with ~~minimal~~ ~~notice~~a ~~and~~term ~~affect~~that approximates the ~~timing~~ ~~and~~expected ~~size~~life of ~~orders~~the option. ~~Because~~For ~~our~~the ~~operating~~expected ~~expenses~~life ~~are~~of ~~based~~the onoptions, ~~anticipated~~we ~~revenue~~have ~~levels~~applied ~~and~~the asimplified ~~high~~method ~~percentage~~allowed ofunder ~~our~~Staff ~~operating~~Accounting ~~costs~~Bulletin, ~~are~~Topic ~~relatively~~14.D.2. ~~fixed,~~SFAS ~~variations~~123(R) inrequires forfeitures to be estimated at the ~~timing~~time of ~~revenue~~ ~~recognition~~the ~~will~~grant ~~result~~and inrevised, ~~significant~~if ~~fluctuations~~necessary, in ~~operating~~subsequent ~~results~~periods ~~from~~if ~~period~~actual ~~to period~~forfeitures differ from estimates.

WeIf ~~have~~factors ~~two~~change ~~significant customers that accounted for 25%~~ and ~~19%~~we ofemploy ~~net~~different ~~sales~~assumptions in the ~~first~~application ~~quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~SFAS ~~2005~~123(R) ~~and 17% and 18% of net sales~~ in ~~the~~future ~~first quarter of fiscal 2004. We anticipate~~periods, ~~but~~ ~~cannot~~the ~~assure,~~compensation expense that ~~these~~we ~~customers~~record ~~will continue to be significant throughout fiscal 2005.~~under ~~However,~~SFAS ~~the~~123(R) ~~loss~~may ~~of,~~differ orsignificantly ~~significant~~from ~~decrease~~what inwe ~~sales to, either of these customers could~~ have ~~a material~~recorded ~~adverse~~in ~~effect on~~ the ~~Company~~current periods.

WeAllowance are dependent on our bank credit facilities to fund operations. Our ability to maintain working capital depends on compliance with the credit agreements. The senior credit agreement was amended in February 2005, revising certain ratios and providing for aDoubtful ~~temporary~~Accounts increase in the interest rates applicable to the loan, ranging from 0.25% to 0.5%, when ratios fall outside certain parameters. The Company’s credit facilities are discussed below under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

~~Liquidity~~We record an allowance for doubtful accounts based on identification of specific accounts receivable, supplemented by a general allowance of approximately 20% of accounts aged greater than 90 days not otherwise specifically considered. Specific identification of doubtful accounts and ~~Capital~~determination ~~Resources~~of the amount of the required allowance involve a degree of judgment based on discussion with our customer support and sales organization, examination of the financial stability of our customers and review of their payment history. Accounts determined to be uncollectible are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. There can be no assurance that our estimates will match actual amounts ultimately written off. During periods of downturn in the market for printed materials or economic recession, a greater degree of risk exists concerning the ultimate collectability of accounts receivable due to the impact that these conditions might have on our customer base. We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts quarterly.

~~Working~~Income ~~capital~~Taxes was $22.2 million at December 31, 2004, compared with $22.1 million at September 30, 2004. Accounts receivable increased from $7.9 million at September 30, 2004, to $8.4 million at December 31, 2004 due to timing of collections. Inventory decreased from $21.7 million at September 30, 2004, to $20.8 million at December 31, 2004 primarily due to sale of finished goods. Accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased approximately $874,000, from $9.1 million at September 30, 2004, to $8.3 million at December 31, 2004, primarily due to control over inventory purchases and expenses, partially offset by a customer deposit on a CR Series system placed at a customer site on a trial basis during the current-year quarter. In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, our debt decreased by approximately $415,000, primarily due to the reduction of the French credit facility.

14In determining the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets, we assess the likelihood of sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions, based on estimates and assumptions, to realize the benefit of these assets. We have fully reserved our net deferred tax assets, totaling $4.1 million and $1.6 million as of June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively, recognizing that the Company has incurred income tax losses in two of the last four fiscal years, expects to incur a loss for the full fiscal 2006 and has no assurance that future years will be profitable. If these estimates and assumptions change in the future, we may record a reduction in the valuation allowance, resulting in an income tax benefit in the statements of operations. We evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets and assess the valuation allowance quarterly.

~~Table~~14 ~~of Contents~~

WeTable haveof undertaken no significant investing activities. No significant capital investment has been undertaken, and at December 31, 2004, Delphax had no material commitments for capital expenditures. Short-term investments are purchased as cash is available and sold as they mature. Contents

OnResults ~~February 5, 2004, we refinanced our bank debt by (i) issuing at par $3.0 million~~ of ~~convertible subordinated~~Operations notes that were accompanied by warrants to purchase Company Common Stock, and (ii) entering into new senior credit agreements between Delphax and a new senior lender. See Note 6 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for details. We expect availability under the credit facilities to be adequate to fund operations in fiscal 2005.

~~Cautionary~~The ~~Statement~~following table sets forth the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of net sales and should be read in connection with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere in this report.

Statements included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition, the Company’s Annual Report, the Company’s Form 10-K, in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our press releases and in oral statements made to securities market analysts and shareholders, which are not historical or current facts, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(Unaudited)
Sales:
Maintenance, spares and supplies	96.4	%	92.8	%	87.3	%	90.0	%
Printing equipment	3.6		7.2		12.7		10.0

NET SALES	100.0		100.0		100.0		100.0
Cost of sales	56.4		43.7		49.4		45.4

GROSS PROFIT	43.6		56.3		50.6		54.6

Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	59.5		42.1		48.4		43.6
Research and development	11.5		9.1		9.9		8.4

OPERATING EXPENSES	71.0		51.2		58.3		52.0

(LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS	(27.4	)	5.1		(7.7	)	2.6

Net interest expense	2.3		1.8		2.1		2.0
Net realized exchange loss	0.7		0.4		1.0		0.4
Net unrealized exchange (gain) loss	(0.2	)	0.6		(0.3	)	(0.0	)

(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	(30.2	)	2.3		(10.5	)	0.2

Income tax (benefit) expense	(0.2	)	0.1		—		0.1

NET (LOSS) INCOME	(30.0	)%	2.2	%	(10.5	)%	0.1	%

~~The~~Net factors mentioned under the subheading “Factors Affecting Results of Operations” are among those that in some cases have affected, and in the future could affect, the Company’s actual results, and could cause actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statementSales.

~~Item~~The 3Company’s revenues consist of sales of: (i) maintenance, spare parts and supplies, and (ii) printing systems and related equipment. ~~Quantitative~~Our printing systems primarily consist of the CR Series and the ~~Qualitative~~Imaggia. ~~Disclosure~~The Checktronic and Foliotronic are among the Company’s legacy products. Although the Checktronic is now sold principally as a system upgrade or refurbished product in Latin America, Asia and Africa, a new unit was sold in South America in the third quarter of ~~Market~~fiscal ~~Risk~~2006. The Foliotronic is still actively marketed to customers with folio production applications. For the third quarter of fiscal 2006, net sales were $11.4 million, down 14% compared with net sales of $13.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2005. For the first nine months of fiscal 2006, net sales were $36.9 million, down 5% from $39.0 million for the same period in fiscal 2005.

~~The~~For ~~information~~the ~~called~~third quarter of fiscal 2006, net sales from maintenance, spare parts and supplies of $10.9 million were down 10% from $12.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Net sales from maintenance, spare parts and supplies for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 were $32.3 million, compared with $35.1 million for the same period in fiscal 2005, lower by ~~this~~8%. ~~item~~We isattribute ~~provided~~the ~~under~~decrease in net sales from maintenance, spare parts and supplies for the ~~caption~~three ~~“Market~~and ~~Risk”~~nine ~~under~~months ~~Item~~ended June 2.30, 2006 to a decline in usage of our customers’ installed base of legacy equipment and, additionally for the nine-month period, to the timing of purchase ~~Management’s~~orders ~~Discussion~~from certain customers during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We expect net sales from maintenance, spare parts and ~~Analysis~~supplies to experience varying degrees of ~~Results~~downward pressure from the attrition of ~~Operations~~older equipment in the field, throughout the remainder of fiscal 2006 and ~~Financial~~until ~~Condition~~such time as installations of our newer CR Series printing systems are sufficient to reverse this trend.

~~Item~~15 ~~4. Controls and Procedures.~~

(a) EvaluationTable of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Contents

~~The~~Net ~~Chairman~~sales ~~and~~of ~~Chief~~printing ~~Executive~~equipment ~~Officer,~~were ~~Jay A~~$0.4 ~~Herman,~~million and ~~Vice~~$0.9 ~~President~~million for the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and ~~Chief~~2005, ~~Financial Officer~~respectively, ~~Jeffrey~~down S56% year-to-year. ~~Mathiesen~~One CR Series unit was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, ~~have~~none ~~reviewed~~in the ~~Company’s~~third ~~disclosure~~quarter ~~controls~~of ~~and procedures~~fiscal ~~within~~2006. 90For the nine months ended June ~~days~~30, ~~prior~~2006, tonet sales of printing equipment were $4.7 million, a 20% increase over printing equipment sales for the ~~filing~~same period in fiscal 2005 of ~~this~~$3.9 ~~report~~million. ~~Based~~For ~~upon~~the ~~this~~first ~~review~~nine months of fiscal 2006 compared with the same period in of fiscal 2005, ~~these~~the increase in net sales of printing equipment was primarily ~~officers~~due ~~believe~~to ~~that~~higher ~~our~~CR ~~disclosure~~Series ~~controls~~sales, four units in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and ~~procedures~~three ~~are~~units ~~effective~~in the same period in ~~ensuring~~fiscal ~~that~~2005. Legacy product sales were also slightly higher in the first nine months of fiscal 2006 than in the same ~~material~~period ~~information~~in ~~related~~fiscal to2005. ~~Delphax~~The isincrease ~~made~~in ~~known~~legacy toproduct ~~them~~sales was partially offset by ~~others~~lower ~~within~~Imaggia sales. One Imaggia unit was sold in the ~~organization.~~first nine months of fiscal 2005; only Imaggia upgrades were sold in the first nine months of fiscal 2006.

~~(b) Changes~~Gross ~~in Internal Controls~~Margin.

~~There~~The ~~were~~Company’s nogross ~~significant~~margin ~~changes~~percentage infor the ~~Company’s~~third ~~internal~~quarter ~~controls~~of orfiscal in2006 ~~other~~was ~~factors~~44%, ~~that could~~compared ~~significantly~~with ~~affect~~56% ~~these~~for ~~controls during~~ the third quarter ~~covered~~of byfiscal ~~this~~2005. ~~report~~The ordecrease ~~from~~in the ~~end~~gross margin percentage between periods was primarily due to sales mix and higher unabsorbed manufacturing costs. Unabsorbed manufacturing costs were higher as a result of ~~the~~production ~~reporting~~at ~~period~~levels tolower ~~the~~than ~~date~~normal capacity, layoff of ~~this~~production ~~Form~~staff 10and write-Q.down of certain inventory to market value.

15The gross margin percentages for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 and 2005 were 51% and 55%, respectively. The decrease in the gross margin percentage between periods was primarily due to sales mix, partially offset by a $223,000 improvement in the level of unabsorbed labor costs.

~~Table~~Selling, ofGeneral ~~Contents~~and Administrative Expenses.

~~PART~~Selling, IIgeneral and administrative expenses were $6.8 ~~OTHER~~million ~~INFORMATION~~for the third quarter of fiscal 2006, compared with $5.5 million for the same quarter of fiscal 2005. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 60% for the third quarter of fiscal 2006, compared with 42% for the year-ago quarter. For the three- month period ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period in fiscal 2005, selling, general and administrative expenses included CEO Severance. In addition, third quarter fiscal 2006 tradeshow and bad debt expenses were higher than for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 by approximately $523,000 and $205,000, respectively, partially offset by commissions to a third-party distributor which were lower by approximately $241,000.

~~Item~~Selling, general and administrative expenses were $17.9 million and $17.0 million for the nine months ended June 230, 2006 and 2005, respectively. ~~Recent~~As ~~Sales~~a percentage of net ~~Unregistered~~sales, ~~Securities~~selling, general and administrative expenses were 48% and 44%, respectively, for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. For the nine-month period ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period in fiscal 2005, selling, general and administrative expenses included CEO Severance and $113,000 for expensing of stock options in accordance with SFAS 123(R). In addition, expenses were higher for tradeshows by approximately $339,000, for bad debt expense by approximately $299,000 and for customer support travel and consulting expenses by approximately $234,000. These higher selling, general and administrative expenses for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 compared with the same period in fiscal 2005 were partially offset by commissions to a third-party distributor which were lower by approximately $581,000.

~~On October 1, 2004, the~~Research Company issued 16,406 shares of Company Common Stock in payment of $67,000 of accrued interest on the Company’s Convertible Notes. As of December 31, 2004, interest of $65,000 on the Convertible Notes was accrued related to the 16,406 shares issued on January 3, 2005. The Convertible Notes provide for 7% interest in the form of Company Common Stock, issued on the first business day of each calendar quarter, computed based on the initial conversion price of $3.20 per share. The shares issued on October 1, 2004 and ~~January 3,~~Development ~~2005 where issued in reliance on the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended~~Expenses. ~~No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid.~~

~~Item~~Research 5and development expenses were $1.3 ~~Other~~million ~~Information~~for the third quarter of fiscal 2006, compared with $1.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2005, or 11% and 9% of net sales in each period, respectively. For the nine months ended June 30, 2006, research and development expenses were $3.7 million, compared with $3.3 million for the same period in fiscal 2005, or 10% and 8% of net sales, respectively. The increases between comparable periods in the current compared with the prior fiscal year were primarily the result of increased compensation costs related to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar.

On16 February 11, 2005, Delphax and its Canadian subsidiary entered into amendments to their credit agreements with their senior lenders. The amendments are attached as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to this Quarterly Report.

TheTable amendments reduce the debt service coverage ratio and interest coverage ratio requirements as of December 31, 2004, through March 31, 2005. During that period, the interest rates applicable to the loan are temporarily increased by 0.25% to 0.5% when the ratios fall outside of certain parameters. The potential increase in interest expense during this period is not expected to be material. Contents

~~Item~~Net 6Interest Expense. ~~Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K~~

Net interest expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2006 was $265,000 (aconsisting of $126,000 cash and $139,000 non-cash interest) , compared with $241,000 (consisting of $104,000 cash and $137,000 non-cash interest) for the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Net interest expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 was $761,000 (consisting of $359,000 cash and $402,000 non-cash interest), compared with $769,000 (consisting of $345,000 cash and $424,000 non-cash interest) for first nine months of fiscal 2005. The ~~following~~bank ~~exhibits~~debt ~~are~~levels, ~~included~~to ~~herein:~~which the cash interest expense applies, have tended to be lower and the interest rates higher in fiscal 2006, compared with fiscal 2005. Non-cash interest relates to the Convertible Notes. For the third quarter of fiscal 2006, non-cash interest expense was higher than in the comparable 2005 period due to higher amortization of the original issue discount, only partially offset by the effects of the lower average market price of Delphax stock over the interest period. For the nine months ended June 30, 2006, non-cash interest expense was lower than for the same period in fiscal 2005 due to the effects of the lower average market price of Delphax stock over the interest periods, partially offset by higher amortization of the original issue discount.

~~10.1 Amendment~~Foreign ~~No. 4~~Exchange toGains ~~Loan~~ and ~~Security Agreement Dated February 4, 2004 between Delphax Technologies Inc~~Losses. ~~and LaSalle Business Credit, LLC~~

10Delphax incurs realized and unrealized transactional foreign exchange gains and losses on currency conversion transactions that are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.2 Realized and unrealized transactional exchange gains and losses reflect actual and anticipated gains or losses recognized as the result of ~~Amending~~transactions ~~Agreement~~among Nothe Company and its subsidiaries that have different functional currencies. The net transactional exchange loss for the three months ended June 230, to2006 ~~Loan~~was ~~and~~$56,000, ~~Security~~compared ~~Agreement~~with ~~Dated~~a loss of $133,000 for the same period in ~~February~~fiscal 2005. For the nine-month periods ended June 430, ~~2004~~2006 ~~between~~and ~~Delphax~~2005, ~~Technologies~~we ~~Canada~~recognized ~~Limited~~transactional foreign exchange losses of $284,000 and $174,000, respectively. The increase in realized transactional foreign exchange losses between the ~~ABN~~nine-month ~~AMRO~~period ~~Bank~~ended NJune 30, 2006, compared with the same period in fiscal 2005, was primarily the result of the Canadian subsidiary collecting its receivables in U.VS. dollars, ~~Canada~~and ~~Branch~~then needing to exchange them for Canadian dollars to pay expenses. The decrease in realized transactional foreign exchange losses between the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, compared with the same period in fiscal 2005, was primarily the result of utilizing a lower-cost seller of Canadian dollars, beginning in the latter part of March 2006.

~~31.1~~The ~~Certification~~Company ~~pursuant~~experiences translational foreign currency exchange gains and losses, which are reflected in equity, with gains due to ~~Section 302~~the weakening, and losses due to the strengthening, of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~U.S. ~~Act~~dollar against the currencies of ~~2002~~our ~~(Rules 13a-14~~ foreign subsidiaries and ~~15d-14~~the resulting effect of currency translation on the ~~Exchange~~valuation ~~Act)~~of the intercompany accounts and certain assets of the subsidiaries, which are denominated in U.S. dollars. The functional currency of the Canadian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. We anticipate continuing to have transactional and translational foreign currency gains and losses from foreign operations in the future.

~~31.2~~Income ~~Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act)~~Taxes.

~~32.1~~For ~~Certification~~fiscal ~~pursuant~~2006, we expect to ~~Section 906~~incur no income tax expense. As a result, income taxes accrued on an interim-period basis for the first half of fiscal 2006 were reversed in the ~~Sarbanes~~third quarter for a quarterly tax benefit of $26,000. For fiscal 2005, we projected that our income tax expense would be comprised of applicable minimum taxes, as we anticipated utilizing loss carry-~~Oxley~~forwards ~~Act~~from previous years. Interim income tax expense for the third quarter and the first nine months of ~~2002~~fiscal ~~(18~~2005 Uwas recognized on that basis, at $12,000 and $36,000, respectively.S As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, we have fully reserved deferred tax assets of $4.C1 million and $2.0 §million, respectively, recognizing that Delphax has ~~1350)~~incurred income tax losses in two of the last four fiscal years, expects to incur a loss for the full fiscal 2006 and has no assurance that future years will be profitable.

~~32.2~~Earnings ~~Certification~~or ~~pursuant~~Loss toper ~~Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U~~Share.~~S.C.~~ ~~§ 1350).~~

~~(b) The~~For ~~following~~the third ~~report~~quarter onof ~~Form~~fiscal ~~8-K~~2006, basic and diluted loss per share was ~~filed~~$0.53, ~~during~~compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.05 for the ~~three~~third quarter of fiscal 2005. For the first nine months ~~ended~~of ~~December 31~~fiscal 2006, ~~2004:~~basic and diluted loss per share was $0.61, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of zero for the first nine months

~~December~~17 ~~16, 2004 - Form 8-K: Item 12. Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition - Earnings release issued December 16, 2004, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.~~

16 Table of Contents

~~Table~~of fiscal 2005. The decline in our net income in the fiscal 2006 periods compared with the fiscal 2005 periods was primarily attributable to lower net sales volumes and lower-margin sales, higher cost of ~~Contents~~sales expenses related to production at levels lower than normal capacity, severed production staff and write-down of certain inventory to market value and CEO Severance.

~~SIGNATURES~~ Market Risk

~~Pursuant~~Delphax tohas ~~the~~foreign subsidiaries ~~requirements~~in ofCanada, the ~~Securities~~United ~~Exchange~~Kingdom ~~Act~~and France. We do business in more than 60 countries and generate approximately 20% to 30% of ~~1934,~~our ~~the~~net ~~registrant~~sales ~~has~~from ~~duly~~outside ~~caused this~~North ~~report~~America. Our ability to besell ~~signed~~our onproducts ~~its~~in ~~behalf~~foreign markets may be affected by changes in economic, political or market conditions in the ~~undersigned~~foreign ~~thereunto~~markets ~~duly~~in ~~authorized~~which we do business.

		DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
		Registrant
Date February 11, 2005		/s/ Jay A. Herman
		Jay A. Herman
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date February 11, 2005		/s/ Jeffrey S. Mathiesen
		Jeffrey S. Mathiesen
		Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

The Company’s net investment in its foreign subsidiaries was $4.6 million and $7.1 million at June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively, translated into U.S. dollars at the closing exchange rates. The potential loss based on end-of-period balances and prevailing exchange rates resulting from a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the dollar against foreign currencies was not material for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. The functional currency of the Canadian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar.

17From time to time, the Company has entered into foreign exchange contracts as a hedge against specific foreign currency receivables. In the fiscal-year-to-date period and in fiscal 2005, the Company did not enter into any foreign exchange contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

Substantially all of our senior debt and the associated interest expense are sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates. A hypothetical 100 basis point (one percentage point) increase in interest rates would result in incremental interest expense of approximately $14,000 and $16,000, respectively, for the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and 2005, and $40,000 and $50,000, respectively, for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

Interest on the $3.0 million of outstanding Convertible Notes is determined by dividing the monetary value of the accrued interest at a fixed 7% rate by the initial conversion price of $3.20 per common share, or 16,406 shares of Common Stock. Interest expense on the Convertible Notes is accrued based on the fair value of the 16,406 shares issued quarterly in payment of interest, measured at the average closing price of the Common Stock over the interest period. Accordingly, interest expense on the Convertible Notes may fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of market risk from the volatility of the price of our Common Stock, but is not subject to interest rate risk.

Risk Related to Operations

The Company’s operations are subject to a number of risks, which include but are not limited to the following:

Limited sales of our new product lines. Acquisition of our Canadian subsidiary in December 2001 significantly expanded our product lines to include the CR Series and RS Series of roll-fed printing equipment. To date, a limited number of CR Series presses and RS Series print systems have been sold and there can be no assurance that these products can be sold in meaningful numbers in the future.

Reliance on significant customers. In the third quarter of 2006, we had two significant customers that individually accounted for 33% and 20% of net sales. This compares with 28% and 17% in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. For the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, these customers individually accounted for 29% and 19%, and 28% and 18% of net sales. Net sales from these two customers have typically been significant to total net sales. We anticipate, but cannot assure, that these customers will continue to be significant throughout the remainder of fiscal 2006. The loss of, or a significant decrease in sales to, either of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operation.

Requirements for availability of working capital. We depend on our revolving credit facilities for working capital. The lender has a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. Our ability to borrow under the credit facilities depends on maintaining a borrowing base of eligible accounts receivable and, to a lesser extent, eligible inventory and complying with financial covenants concerning tangible net worth, debt service coverage, interest coverage, cash flow and maximum capital expenditures. If the Company is unable to generate a sufficient borrowing base and comply with the financial covenants and other requirements of the credit facilities as amended in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, it will limit or prevent borrowing under the credit facilities and could have a serious adverse effect on the Company.

Substantial operations in foreign markets. Delphax has foreign subsidiaries in Canada, the United Kingdom and France, does business in more than 60 countries and generates approximately 20% to 30% of its net sales from outside North America. The ability to sell products in foreign markets may be affected by changes in economic, political or market conditions in those foreign markets that are outside the Company’s control.

Significant proportion of operating expenses paid in foreign currencies. Though variable by period, we estimate that up to 60% of our operating expenses in any period, the most significant of which is payroll, are paid in currencies other than the US dollar. In addition, our printing presses and proprietary consumables, spares and supplies are manufactured by our Canadian subsidiary, which, unlike our other foreign subsidiaries, does not generate any cash inflows in its local currency. In periods where the dollar has weakened in relation to comparable reporting periods, higher expenses and higher manufactured-product costs are incurred on a US dollar basis when equal expense levels are incurred on a functional currency basis.

Net sales are subject to fluctuations, which may be material. Our net sales and operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter because the sales cycle is relatively long, the size of orders may vary significantly, the availability of financing for customers in some countries is variable, customers may postpone or cancel orders, and economic, political and market conditions in some markets change with minimal notice and affect the timing and size of orders. Because operating expenses are based on anticipated net sales levels and a high percentage of the operating costs are relatively fixed in the short-term, variations in the timing of revenue recognition could result in significant fluctuations in operating results from period to period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working capital was $14.3 million at June 30, 2006, compared with $21.6 million at September 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily the result of reclassifying the outstanding credit facilities expiring in April 2007 as a current liability. In addition, accounts receivable and inventory were lower by approximately $310,000 and $575,000, respectively, and accrued compensation was higher by approximately $1.3 million, partially offset by lower customer deposits and deferred revenue lower by approximately $907,000. Accrued compensation was higher as a result of accruing severance for the former chief executive officer of Delphax and terminated production staff and due to the timing of payment of the last pay period in June 2006. Customer deposits decreased from $1.0 million at September 30, 2005, to $33,000 at June 30, 2006, primarily due to recognition of revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 related to deposits on equipment at customer sites as of September 30, 2005.

Debt, excluding capital leases, totaled approximately $8.2 million and $6.2 million as of June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively, detailed as follows:


	June 30, 2006				September 30, 2005
	Balance Outstanding		Available Credit		Balance Outstanding		Available Credit
	(In thousands)
Senior credit facilities:
Term loans	$	690	$	—	$	836	$	—
Revolving loans, $12.5 million limit		5,063		3,545		3,203		5,592
Line of credit, France		—		63		—		—
Line of credit, United Kingdom		—		184		—		176

Total bank credit facilites		5,753		3,792		4,039		5,768

7% Convertible Notes, $3.0 million issued at a discount of $1.4 million amortized over the the 4-year term of the loan		2,408		—		2,143		—

Total debt, excluding capital leases	$	8,161	$	3,792	$	6,182	$	5,768

We expect availability under the credit facilities as amended in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 to be adequate to fund operations throughout fiscal 2006 and until such time as the credit agreements expire in April 2007. However, should our net sales be too low to generate sufficient accounts receivable for our borrowing base or the results of operations be insufficient to comply with the financial covenants of our credit agreements, as amended, it will limit or prevent borrowing under the credit facilities and could have a serious adverse effect on the Company. We have begun the process of reviewing financing options to replace the expiring agreements.

We have undertaken no significant investing activities. In conjunction with moving the Corporate headquarters to 6100 West 110^th Street, Bloomington, MN 55438, we have committed to a capital lease agreement for approximately $187,000 of communications equipment and leasehold improvements, the lease to commence in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.

Cautionary Statement

Statements included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Company’s Annual Report, the Company’s Form 10-K, in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our press releases and in oral statements made to securities market analysts and shareholders, which are not historical or current facts, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected.

The factors mentioned under the subheading “Risk Related to Operations” are among those that in some cases have affected, and in the future could affect, the Company’s actual results, and could cause actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statement.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The information called for by this item is provided under the caption “Market Risk” under Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 30, 2006. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to the material information relating to us (or our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.

During the fiscal quarter covered by this report, there were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a – 15(f) under the Exchange Act) or in other factors that have materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On April 3, 2006, we issued 16,406 shares of Common Stock in payment of $48,000 of accrued interest on the Convertible Notes. As of June 30, 2006, interest of $50,000 on the Convertible Notes was accrued related to the 16,406 shares issued on July 3, 2006. The Convertible Notes provide for 7% interest in the form of Company Common Stock, issued on the first business day of each calendar quarter, computed based on the initial conversion price of $3.20 per share. The shares issued on April 3, 2006 and July 3, 2006 were issued in reliance on the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid.

Effective May 30, 2006, 15,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued to Dieter P. Schilling, President and Chief Executive Officer. These shares will be earned by Mr. Schilling over a three-year vesting period and were included in our stock compensation expense calculation under SFAS 123(R).

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 6, 2006. At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders re-elected Earl W. Rogers to serve through the 2009 Annual Meeting. Mr. Roger’s re-election was by a vote of 5,635,375 shares in favor, 89,386 shares withholding authority and a broker non-vote of zero shares. Shareholders also approved the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s independent public auditors for fiscal 2006 by a vote of 5,714,675 shares in favor, 1,638 shares against, 8,448 shares abstaining and a broker non-vote of zero shares.

Item 6. Exhibits.

The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this report:

10.1 Amendment No. 6 to Loan and Security Agreement dated February 4, 2004, between Delphax Technologies Inc. and LaSalle Business Credit, LLC

10.2 Amending Agreement No. 4 between Delphax Technologies Canada Limited and ABM AMRO Bank N.V., Canada Branch

10.3 Executive Employment Agreement – Gregory S. Furness, Chief Financial Officer

10.4 Executive Employment Agreement – George P. Carranza, Vice President Sales and Marketing

31.1 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act).

31.2 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act).

32.1 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350).

32.2 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
		Registrant

Date August 11, 2006		/s/ Dieter P. Schilling
		Dieter P. Schilling
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Date August 11, 2006		/s/ Gregory S. Furness
		Gregory S. Furness
		Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
		(Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC