UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005

¨	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 000-50780

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Bermuda		98-0417192
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

P.O. Box HM 1154, 10 Queen Street

Hamilton HM EX, Bermuda

(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)

(441) 296-4856

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

At ~~August~~ November 2, 2005, there were 39,~~181~~206,~~220~~469 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

INDEX

		Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)	6
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 (Unaudited)	7
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 (Unaudited)	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	27
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk		28
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	28
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		28
Part II. Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	29
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		29
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	29
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		29
Item 6.	Exhibits	29
Item 6. Exhibits		29
Signatures		30

PART I—Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except share and per-share data)

(Unaudited)

	June 30,2005			December 31,2004
	September 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1831,~~497~~658		$	27,512
Marketable securities		~~851~~528			1,824
Accounts receivable, (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $20,312 at June 30, 2005 and $25,068 at December 31, 2004)		213,869			210,588
Accounts receivable, (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $16,170 at September 30, 2005 and $25,068 at December 31, 2004)		192,974			210,588
Prepaid assets		96,~~703~~099			3,774
Other current assets		5,~~230~~461			6,415
Restricted cash		2,099			4,724
Total current assets		~~250~~238,~~249~~819			254,837
Property and equipment, (net of accumulated depreciation of $34,756 at June 30, 2005 and $23,361 at December 31, 2004)		131,439			134,083
Property and equipment, (net of accumulated depreciation of $39,903 at September 30, 2005 and $23,361 at December 31, 2004)		132,222			134,083
Prepaid pension asset		1817,~~240~~956			18,802
Other long-term assets		2,~~227~~212			2,836
Investment		~~1,628~~421			—
Intangible assets, (net of accumulated amortization of $15,957 at June 30, 2005 and $10,853 at December 31, 2004)		47,302			46,354
Intangible assets, (net of accumulated amortization of $18,845 at September 30, 2005 and $10,853 at December 31, 2004)		47,974			46,354
Goodwill		96,877			96,877
Total assets	$	~~547~~536,~~962~~481		$	553,789
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	~~267~~257,~~675~~823		$	259,915
Employee related payables		1115,~~260~~081			15,193
Accrued liabilities—affiliate company		77307			537
Current portion of capital lease obligations		3,~~018~~148			2,182
Current portion of deferred revenue		3,~~527~~409			3,883
Current portion of senior notes payable—affiliate company		25,000			—
Total current liabilities		~~310~~304,~~557~~768			281,710
Deferred revenue		8,~~431~~432			8,787
Deferred income tax liability		7052			940
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations		1,~~590~~543			1,112
Other long-term liabilities		25,~~920~~026			3,090
Senior notes payable—affiliate company		75,000			100,000
Total non-current liabilities		8890,~~011~~053			113,929
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock (39,108,492 shares at June 30, 2005 and 39,084,793 shares at December 31, 2004 issued and outstanding and 400,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.01)		391			391
Common stock (39,206,469 shares at September 30, 2005 and 39,084,793 shares at December 31, 2004 issued and outstanding and 400,000,000 shares authorized,par value $0.01)		391			391
Additional paid-in capital		188,~~550~~673			188,495
Deferred compensation expense		(2720	)		(44	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2218	)		(40	)
Accumulated deficit		(3947,~~498~~366	)		(30,652	)
Total stockholders’ equity		~~149~~141,~~394~~660			158,150
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	~~547~~536,~~962~~481		$	553,789

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except share and per-share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedJune 30, 2005			Three Months EndedJune 30, 2004
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005			Three Months Ended September 30, 2004
Telecommunication revenues	$	~~239~~243,~~173~~778		$	~~230~~276,~~651~~789
Operating expenses
Telecommunication		~~169~~177,~~596~~656			~~169~~208,~~370~~322
Network, exclusive of amortization and depreciation shown below		22,~~729~~199			2423,~~068~~379
Selling, general and administrative, exclusive of stock-based compensation expense, bad debt expense, depreciation and amortization shown below		3739,~~439~~904			3239,~~189~~992
Stock-based compensation expense		67			515
Bad debt expense		~~221~~1,180			~~497~~620
Depreciation		5,~~762~~559			57,~~108~~059
Amortization of intangible assets		2,~~648~~909			12,~~960~~869
Foreign exchange loss (gain)		~~1,594~~77			(~~179~~233	)
Total operating expenses		~~239~~249,~~995~~491			~~233~~282,~~018~~023
Interest expense		~~(82~~284	)		23,~~933~~605
Interest expense—related party		2,~~393~~340			12,~~021~~786
Interest income		(~~210~~255	)		(~~133~~120	)
Gain on sale of property and other income		(2,223	)		(67	)
Other income		(347	)		(309	)
Total expenses		~~239~~251,~~873~~513			~~236~~287,~~772~~985
Loss before income taxes		(~~700~~7,735	)		(611,~~121~~196	)
Income tax recovery		(299	)		(2,345	)
Income tax expense (recovery)		133			(165	)
Net loss	$	(~~401~~7,868	)	$	(311,~~776~~031	)
Preferred stock dividends to parent company		—			(1,583	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.28	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(401	)	$	(5,359	)
Number of common shares used for calculation		39,174,520			38,985,663
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.17	)
Number of common shares used for calculation		39,106,709			31,732,709

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

Consolidated Statements of Operations—(Continued)

(amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except share and per-share data)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months EndedJune 30, 2005			Six Months EndedJune 30, 2004
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Telecommunication revenues	$	~~494~~738,~~480~~258		$	~~445~~721,~~195~~984
Operating expenses
Telecommunication		~~359~~536,~~176~~832			~~323~~532,~~726~~048
Network, exclusive of amortization and depreciation shown below		4567,~~508~~707			4771,~~802~~181
Selling, general and administrative, exclusive of stock-based compensation expense, bad debt recovery, restructuring charges, depreciation and amortization shown below		75,371			57,811
Selling, general and administrative, exclusive of stock-based compensation expense, bad debt expense, depreciation, amortization and restructuring charges shown below		115,275			97,803
Stock-based compensation expense		1724			520
Bad debt recovery		(626	)		(590	)
Bad debt expense		554			30
Depreciation		1217,~~009~~568			916,~~237~~295
Amortization of intangible assets		58,~~103~~012			36,~~363~~233
Restructuring charges		—			893
Foreign exchange loss		3,~~520~~597			~~306~~73
Total operating expenses		~~500~~749,~~078~~569			~~442~~724,~~553~~576
Interest expense		1,~~668~~952			59,~~398~~003
Interest expense—related party		47,~~778~~118			13,~~021~~807
Interest income		(~~413~~668	)		(~~209~~329	)
Gain on sale of property and other income		(2,199	)		(75	)
Gain on disposal of property and other income		(2,546	)		(384	)
Total expenses		~~503~~755,~~912~~425			~~448~~736,~~688~~673
Loss before income taxes		(917,~~432~~167	)		(314,~~493~~689	)
Income tax recovery		(~~586~~453	)		(2,~~197~~362	)
Net loss	$	(816,~~846~~714	)	$	(112,~~296~~327	)
Preferred stock dividends to parent company		—			(3,958	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(816,~~846~~714	)	$	(516,~~254~~285	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.2343	)	$	(0.1849	)
Number of common shares used for calculation		39,~~100~~125,~~830~~569			2932,~~919~~941,~~733~~710

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands of United States Dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months EndedJune 30, 2005			Six Months EndedJune 30, 2004
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(816,~~846~~714	)	$	(112,~~296~~327	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1725,~~112~~580			1222,~~600~~528
Net gain on sale of property and equipment		(1,813	)		—
Net gain on disposal of property and equipment		(1,851	)		—
Bad debt recovery		(626	)		(590	)
Bad debt expense		554			30
Stock-based compensation expense		1724			520
Deferred income taxes		(~~870~~888	)		(~~395~~327	)
Other items		~~670~~960			(~~527~~3,819	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(217,~~655~~060	)		16(4,~~627~~933	)
Prepaid assets		(52,~~929~~325	)		(12,~~280~~331	)
Other current assets		~~1,185~~942			(3,~~713~~419	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		~~4,912~~610			(3518,~~764~~690	)
Deferred revenue		(~~949~~1,066	)		(~~878~~266	)
Other liabilities		(~~170~~62	)		~~270~~320
Net cash flows from operating activities		222,~~038~~824			(1418,~~941~~552	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(914,~~898~~713	)		(417,~~930~~045	)
Proceeds on disposal of property and equipment		3,~~292~~431			—
Addition of intangible assets		(48,~~707~~542	)		(1,~~004~~892	)
Sale of marketable securities		~~991~~1,318			1623,~~695~~946
Increase in long-term investment		(~~1,628~~421	)		—
Restricted cash		2,625			(~~451~~401	)
Cash acquired from merger with ITXC, net of acquisition costs paid		—			4,854
Net cash flows from investing activities		(916,~~325~~302	)		159,~~164~~462
Cash flows from financing activities
Retirement of preferred stock-parent company		—			(95,000	)
Dividend payment to parent company		—			(9,448	)
Issuance of senior notes to affiliate company		—			100,000
Capital lease repayment		(12,~~783~~554	)		(75276	)
Issuance of common stock		55178			—
Net cash flows from financing activities		(12,~~728~~376	)		(4,~~523~~724	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(9,015	)		(4,300	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		4,146			(13,814	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		27,512			35,279
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1831,~~497~~658		$	3021,~~979~~465

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(amounts in thousands of United States Dollars)

(Unaudited)

Six Months ended June 30, 2005	CommonStock		AdditionalPaid-inCapital		AccumulatedDeficit			DeferredCompensationExpense			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveloss			TotalStockholders’Equity
Nine Months endedSeptember 30, 2005	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Deferred Compensation Expense			Accumulated Other Comprehensive loss			Total Stockholders’ Equity
December 31, 2004	$	391	$	188,495	$	(30,652	)	$	(44	)	$	(40	)	$	158,150
Issuance of common stock		—		55178		—			—			—			55178
Amortization of deferred compensation expense		—		—		—			1724			—			1724
Net unrealized holding gain on marketable securities		—		—		—			—			1822			1822
Net loss		—		—		(816,~~846~~714	)		—			—			(816,~~846~~714	)
June 30, 2005	$	391	$	188,550	$	(39,498	)	$	(27	)	$	(22	)	$	149,394
September 30, 2005	$	391	$	188,673	$	(47,366	)	$	(20	)	$	(18	)	$	141,660

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The ~~consolidated~~Consolidated ~~financial~~Financial ~~statements~~Statements include the accounts of Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “Teleglobe” or “TIH”). The Company’s controlling shareholder is Cerberus Capital Management, L.P (“Cerberus”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial statements for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 include the assets, liabilities and results of ITXC Corp. (“ITXC”). The merger with ITXC was consummated on May 31, 2004 and thus the financial statements for the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2004 include the assets, liabilities and results of ITXC only from June 1, 2004.

The ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 and 2004 financial statements have been prepared by management of TIH and are unaudited. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments except for purchase price allocations) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 and 2004 have been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been omitted from the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto presented herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto presented herein should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Successor and the Combined Financial Statements of the Predecessor and notes thereto included in the Company’s ~~annual~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and filed on March 17, 2005. The results of operations of the Company for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the entire fiscal year.

Certain comparative figures have been reclassified in order to conform to the presentation adopted in the current periods. Among the reclassified items, is the reclassification of software from property and equipment to intangible assets.

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, the Company’s operating results include a favorable impact of $31.08 million ofin telecommunication ~~revenue~~expense due to ~~major~~the ~~favorable~~revision ~~settlement~~of ~~agreements~~estimates on disputed accounts payables and accrued liabilities with certain carriers and the benefit associated with negotiated retroactive rate adjustments totaling $01.96 million ofon ~~similar~~certain contracts. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company’s operating results include $3.0 million of revenue due to major favorable settlement agreements inwith ~~network~~certain ~~expense~~carriers. Additionally, for the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, the Company’s telecommunication expense ~~was~~and network expense were reduced by major favorable settlements with certain carriers for approximately $25.7 million and $50.79 million respectively.

The accounting policies used in preparation of these financial statements are consistent with those reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Successor in its ~~annual~~Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. ~~Acquisition~~Plan of Amalgamation with VSNL

On ~~May 31~~July 25, ~~2004~~2005, the ~~merger~~Company ~~with~~entered ~~ITXC~~into ~~was~~an ~~completed.~~Agreement ~~The~~and ~~merger~~Plan ~~has~~of ~~been~~Amalgamation ~~accounted for using~~ (the ~~purchase~~“Amalgamation ~~method~~Agreement”) ~~and~~with ~~the~~Videsh ~~purchase~~Sanchar ~~price was allocated to~~Nigam ~~the~~Limited ~~acquired~~(“VSNL”) ~~assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~VSNL ~~based~~Telecommunications on(Bermuda) ~~the~~Ltd., ~~estimated~~a ~~fair~~wholly ~~values~~owned ~~determined~~subsidiary ~~using~~of ~~management’s~~VSNL ~~best~~(“Amalgamation ~~estimates~~Sub”). ~~and~~Pursuant ~~independent~~to ~~valuations as at~~ the ~~acquisition~~Amalgamation ~~date.~~Agreement, ~~The~~which ~~allocation~~is ofsubject ~~the~~to ~~purchase~~approvals ~~price~~and ~~was~~closing ~~finalized~~conditions, ~~during~~Teleglobe ~~the~~will ~~first~~be ~~quarter~~amalgamated ofwith ~~2005~~Amalgamation ~~without~~Sub, ~~change~~and to the ~~amounts~~resulting ~~reported~~company inwill ~~the~~be ~~year-end~~a ~~Consolidated~~wholly ~~Financial~~owned ~~Statements.~~subsidiary ~~The excess~~ of VSNL (the ~~purchase~~“Amalgamation”). ~~consideration~~At ~~over~~ the ~~estimated~~effective ~~fair~~time ~~value~~ of ~~net assets acquired, in the amount of $96.9 million has been~~ ~~accounted for as goodwill.~~

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

~~The~~ the ~~final~~Amalgamation, ~~allocation~~each common share of Teleglobe issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares, if any, held directly or indirectly by Teleglobe, VSNL, Amalgamation Sub or any Teleglobe shareholder that has properly perfected its right to appraisal for such shares in accordance with the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda (the “Companies Act”)) will be exchanged for the right to receive $4.50 per share, all in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act and the Amalgamation Agreement. Upon consummation of the Amalgamation, each option to purchase ~~consideration~~common shares of Teleglobe outstanding immediately prior to the ~~estimated~~effective ~~fair~~time ~~value~~of the Amalgamation that has an exercise price per share less than $4.50 (whether or not then exercisable or vested) will entitle the holder thereof to the right to receive a cash payment in an aggregate amount equal to the product of (A) the ~~net~~excess ~~assets~~of $4.50 over the exercise price per share of such option and (B) the number of shares subject to such option, and such option will be terminated and cancelled immediately prior to such effective time. Upon ~~acquired~~consummation isof the Amalgamation, each option to purchase common shares of Teleglobe outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation that has an exercise price per share equal to or greater than $4.50 will automatically be terminated and cancelled, without any consideration, as ~~follows:~~of such effective time. Upon consummation of the Amalgamation, each warrant to purchase common shares of Teleglobe outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation (whether or not then exercisable or vested) shall entitle the holder thereof to the right to receive, upon exercise and payment of any applicable warrant consideration, a cash payment in an aggregate amount equal to the product of (A) $4.50 and (B) the number of shares subject to such warrant.

	ITXC(000’s)
Estimated fair value of net assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,915
Marketable securities		27,348
Restricted cash		6,317
Accounts receivable		41,642
Prepaids, deposits and other assets		3,600
Property and equipment		24,550
Intangible assets		27,400
Goodwill		96,877
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(53,763	)
Capital lease obligations		(1,227	)
Deferred compensation expense		77
Net identifiable assets acquired	$	180,736
Purchase consideration:
Fair value of common shares issued	$	157,327
Fair value of warrants issued		2,788
Fair value of stock options issued		16,285
Acquisition costs		4,336
Total purchase consideration	$	180,736

Teleglobe’s Board of Directors has approved the Amalgamation Agreement. The Amalgamation is conditioned on, among other things, the approval of the Amalgamation Agreement by the required vote of shareholders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares in Teleglobe’s common share capital, expiration or termination of any waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended and other applicable antitrust laws, the receipt of certain regulatory approvals specified in the Amalgamation Agreement, expiration of the time period for any applicable review process by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States without any action or recommendation by such committee to prevent consummation of the Amalgamation, and the number of shares of shareholders properly exercising their appraisal rights pursuant to the Companies Act does not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the outstanding Teleglobe’s common shares capital. The Amalgamation Agreement also includes certain termination rights and provides that, upon termination of the Amalgamation Agreement under certain circumstances, Teleglobe would be required to pay VSNL a termination fee of $4.5 million. In addition, the Amalgamation agreement includes certain interim operating covenants, subject to certain exceptions, that required Teleglobe to obtain VSNL’s prior written consent, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, for taking certain actions. In connection with the signed Amalgamation Agreement and the result of the vote of October 25, 2005, the Company incurred professional fees from its financial advisor in the amount of $4.5 million. A portion of the fees amounting to $900,000 became due upon the execution of the Amalgamation Agreement on July 25, 2005 and the remaining portion of the fees, which amounts to $3.6 million will become due upon consummation of the Amalgamation.

~~The~~In ~~results~~connection with the execution of the Amalgamation Agreement, Teleglobe ~~operations~~Bermuda Holdings Ltd, an affiliate of ~~ITXC~~Cerberus ~~are~~Capital ~~included~~Management, L.P. and the holder of approximately 66.2% of Teleglobe’s outstanding common shares, has executed a voting agreement with VSNL pursuant to which it agreed to vote its Teleglobe shares in favor of the ~~consolidated~~Amalgamation ~~statement~~Agreement and the Amalgamation and against any alternative transaction, not to transfer its Teleglobe shares, and not to take certain actions specified therein to encourage or facilitate any such alternative transaction. The voting agreement also provides for Teleglobe Bermuda Holdings Ltd to pay to VSNL 75% of ~~operations~~any proceeds in excess of ~~TIH~~$4.50 ~~from~~per ~~June 1~~share that may be received for its Teleglobe shares if the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances. Certain trusts affiliated with Gerald Porter Strong, ~~2004~~president and chief executive officer of Teleglobe, and with Richard D. Willett II, chief

3. Restricted Cash

In conjunction with its letters of credit for its leased premises, the Company has $2.1 million in restricted cash as of June 30, 2005 that represents the collateral supporting the letters of credit. The majority of the $2.1 million relates to a letter of credit for the leased premises in Princeton, New Jersey. The letters of credit related to the leased premises expire through July 2006.

4. Investment

During the first quarter of 2005, the Company purchased 2,207,202 shares of Wmode Inc. (“Wmode”), representing approximately 5% of the outstanding equity, and exclusive distribution rights to Wmode’s proprietary technology for $2.0 million Canadian dollars ($1.6 million US dollars equivalent). The exclusivity to the distribution rights are subject to attaining certain revenue levels. Wmode is a Canadian based, privately held leading provider of mobile content distribution services for content providers, mobile operators and media and brand companies. Teleglobe has agreed to purchase up to 4,415,402 shares of Wmode for total consideration of $4.0 million Canadian dollars in tranches upon the achievement of certain development and operational milestones throughout 2005. As at June 30, 2005, the remaining commitment to purchase shares of Wmode is $2.0 million Canadian dollars. The total amount of shares to be issued to Teleglobe under this agreement would total approximately 10% of the total shares outstanding of Wmode. The Company is currently finalizing the accounting of this investment including an allocation of the purchase consideration.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

5 operating officer of Teleglobe, have executed similar voting agreements with VSNL. ~~Comprehensive~~Each ~~Loss~~of the above-referenced voting agreements will terminate on the earliest to occur of (i) the effective time of the Amalgamation, (ii) the termination of such voting agreement by the mutual written agreement of the parties thereto, and (iii) the date of termination of the Amalgamation Agreement.

On October 25, 2005, the Company held a Special General Meeting of shareholders to vote on the Plan of Amalgamation with VSNL. The ~~components~~Company’s shareholders approved Teleglobe’s acquisition by VSNL. Over 99% of ~~comprehensive~~all ~~loss~~votes ~~for~~cast at the ~~periods~~special ~~indicated~~shareholders ~~are~~meeting asrepresenting ~~follows:~~over 78% of Teleglobe’s shares outstanding were in favor of the transaction, which required the approval of a majority of the shares outstanding.

(amounts in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005			Three Months Ended June 30, 2004			Six Months Ended June 30, 2005			Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net loss	$	(401	)	$	(3,776	)	$	(8,846	)	$	(1,296	)
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) on marketable securities		10			(18	)		18			(18	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(391	)	$	(3,794	)	$	(8,828	)	$	(1,314	)

More details on the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation are provided in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 26, 2005.

63. ~~Stock-Based~~Acquisition ~~Compensation Plans~~

~~The~~On ~~Company~~May 31, ~~accounts~~2004, ~~for~~the ~~stock-based~~merger ~~awards~~with toITXC ~~employees~~was completed. The merger has ~~and~~been ~~directors~~accounted for using the ~~intrinsic~~purchase ~~value~~ method ofand ~~accounting~~the inpurchase ~~accordance~~price ~~with~~was ~~Accounting~~allocated ~~Principles~~to ~~Board~~the ~~Opinion~~acquired ~~No.~~assets ~~25,~~and ~~Accounting~~liabilities ~~for~~based ~~Stock~~on ~~Issued~~the toestimated ~~Employees~~fair ~~(“APB~~values ~~25”).~~determined ~~Under~~using ~~the~~management’s ~~intrinsic~~best ~~value~~estimates ~~method,~~and ~~when~~independent ~~the~~valuations ~~market~~as ~~price~~at the acquisition date. The allocation of the ~~underlying~~purchase ~~stock~~price onwas finalized during the ~~date~~first quarter of ~~grant~~2005 ~~exceeds~~without change to the ~~exercise~~amounts ~~price~~reported ofin the ~~Company’s~~year-end ~~employee~~Consolidated ~~stock~~Financial ~~award,~~Statements. ~~compensation~~The ~~expense~~excess isof ~~recognized~~the purchase consideration over the estimated ~~vesting~~fair ~~period.~~value ~~The~~of ~~Company~~net isassets ~~required~~acquired, ~~under~~in ~~SFAS~~the Noamount of $96.9 ~~123~~million tohas ~~disclose~~been ~~pro-forma information~~accounted ~~regarding~~for ~~stock-based~~as ~~award~~goodwill. ~~grants~~The ~~made~~final allocation of the purchase consideration to ~~its~~the ~~employees~~estimated ~~based~~fair onvalue ~~specified~~of ~~valuation~~the ~~techniques~~net ~~that~~assets ~~produce~~acquired ~~estimated~~is ~~compensation~~as ~~charges.~~follows:

Fair Value Assumptions


	ITXC (000’s)
Estimated fair value of net assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,915
Marketable securities		27,348
Restricted cash		6,317
Accounts receivable		41,642
Prepaids, deposits and other assets		3,600
Property and equipment		24,550
Intangible assets		27,400
Goodwill		96,877
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(53,763	)
Capital lease obligations		(1,227	)
Deferred compensation expense		77

Net identifiable assets acquired	$	180,736

Purchase consideration:
Fair value of common shares issued	$	157,327
Fair value of warrants issued		2,788
Fair value of stock options issued		16,285
Acquisition costs		4,336

Total purchase consideration	$	180,736

The Company granted 120,000 stock options on January 31, 2005 at an exercise price of $4.02 per share, 190,000 stock options on March 2, 2005 at an exercise price of $5.00 per share and 44,000 stock options on May 19, 2005 at an exercise price of $2.35. The exercise prices equal the NASDAQ closing price on the date of grants. The options vest at a rate of one third per year from the date of grant and terminate no later than seven years after the grant date. The weighted-average fair value of the options granted on January 31, 2005 is $3.23 per stock option, $4.03 per stock option granted on March 2, 2005 and $1.89 per stock option granted on May 19, 2005. The fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	May 19,2005		March 2,2005		January 31,2005
Expected life (in years)	6		6		6
Risk-free interest rate	3.86	%	4.20	%	3.92	%
Volatility	100	%	100	%	100	%
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%	0	%

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

The ~~following table summarizes relevant information as to reported~~ results ~~under~~of ~~the~~operations ~~Company’s intrinsic value method~~ of ~~accounting~~ITXC ~~for~~are ~~stock~~included ~~options,~~in ~~with supplemental pro-forma information as if~~ the ~~fair~~consolidated ~~value~~statement ~~recognition~~of ~~provisions~~operations of ~~SFAS~~TIH from NoJune 1, 2004. ~~123 had been applied for the periods indicated:~~

(amounts in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005			Three Months Ended June 30, 2004			Six Months Ended June 30, 2005			Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net loss	$	(401	)	$	(3,776	)	$	(8,846	)	$	(1,296	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			(1,583	)		—			(3,958	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders		(401	)		(5,359	)		(8,846	)		(5,254	)
Add: stock-based compensation, as reported pursuant to APB 25		6			5			17			5
Deduct: total stock-based compensation determined under fair value based methods for all awards		(1,465	)		(1,214	)		(3,073	)		(1,214	)
Pro-forma net loss, fair value method for all stock-based awards		(1,860	)		(6,568	)		(11,902	)		(6,463	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share, as reported	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.18	)
Pro-forma basic and diluted net loss per share, SFAS 123	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.22	)

4. Restricted Cash

7In conjunction with its letters of credit for its leased premises, the Company has $2.1 ~~Common~~million ~~Stock~~in ~~and~~restricted ~~Earnings~~cash ~~per~~as of September 30, 2005 that represents the collateral supporting the letters of credit. The majority of the $2.1 million relates to a letter of credit for the leased premises in Princeton, New ~~Share~~Jersey, which expires in July 2006.

~~During~~5. ~~the~~Investment ~~six months ended June 30, 2005, stock options~~ in ~~respect~~Wmode ~~of 23,699 common shares were exercised for cash consideration of $55,000.~~

~~Basic~~During ~~earnings~~the ~~per~~nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company purchased 3,311,552 shares of Wmode Inc. (“Wmode”), representing approximately 7.5% of the outstanding share iscapital ~~calculated~~for bya ~~dividing~~cash ~~net~~consideration ~~income~~of ~~attributable~~$3.0 million Canadian dollars ($2.4 million US dollars equivalent). Concurrently, the Company entered into a five-year agreement for the exclusive distribution rights to ~~common~~Wmode’s ~~stockholders~~proprietary bytechnology and a revenue sharing agreement whereby Teleglobe would retain a portion of total revenues generated from Wmode’s proprietary technology. The exclusivity to the ~~weighted~~distribution ~~average~~rights ~~number~~is subject to attaining certain revenue levels. Wmode is a Canadian based, privately held provider of ~~common~~mobile content distribution services for content providers, mobile operators and media and brand companies. Teleglobe has agreed to purchase up to 4,415,402 shares ~~outstanding~~of ~~during~~Wmode for total cash consideration of $4.0 million Canadian dollars in tranches upon the ~~period~~achievement of certain development and operational milestones throughout 2005. The total amount of shares to be issued to Teleglobe under this agreement would represent approximately 10% of the total shares outstanding of Wmode.

~~Diluted~~The ~~earnings~~cash ~~per~~consideration ~~share~~paid for the shares is ~~determined~~allocated inon ~~the~~a ~~same~~pro-rated ~~manner~~basis asbetween ~~basic~~the ~~earnings per~~investment in Wmode’s share ~~except~~capital ~~that~~and the ~~number~~exclusive distribution ofrights ~~shares~~to isWmode’s ~~increased~~proprietary ~~assuming~~technology ~~exercise~~based ofon ~~dilutive~~the ~~stock~~estimated ~~options~~fair ~~and~~value ~~warrants~~of ~~using~~both ~~the~~elements ~~treasury~~as ~~stock~~determined ~~method~~by Teleglobe’s management. The ~~diluted~~cash ~~earnings~~consideration ~~per~~paid ~~share~~to- ~~amount~~date ~~equals~~has ~~basic~~been ~~earnings~~allocated ~~per~~to ~~share~~investment ~~because~~for $0.4 million and to the ~~Company~~exclusive ~~had~~distribution arights ~~net loss~~to ~~and~~Wmode’s ~~the~~proprietary ~~impact~~technology offor ~~the~~$2.0 ~~assumed~~million ~~exercise~~as of ~~the~~September 30, ~~stock~~2005. ~~options~~The ~~and~~distribution ~~warrants~~rights is ~~not~~recorded ~~dilutive~~as an amortizable intangible asset (see Note 14).

~~Basic~~6. ~~and~~Comprehensive ~~diluted~~Loss ~~loss per share calculation is as follows (in thousands, except share and per-share data):~~

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005			Three Months Ended June 30, 2004			Six Months Ended June 30, 2005			Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(401	)	$	(5,359	)	$	(8,846	)	$	(5,254	)
Basic and diluted loss per share:	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.18	)
Weighted-average shares		39,106,709			31,732,709			39,100,830			29,919,733

The components of comprehensive loss for the periods indicated are as follows:


(amounts in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005			Three Months Ended September 30, 2004			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Net loss	$	(7,868	)	$	(11,031	)	$	(16,714	)	$	(12,327	)
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) on marketable securities		4			(42	)		22			(60	)

Comprehensive loss	$	(7,864	)	$	(11,073	)	$	(16,692	)	$	(12,387	)

7. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”). Under the intrinsic value method, when the market price of the underlying stock on the

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

8 date of grant exceeds the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock award, compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period. ~~Retention~~The ~~Bonuses~~Company is required under SFAS No. 123 to disclose pro-forma information regarding stock-based award grants made to its employees based on specified valuation techniques that produce estimated compensation charges.

~~Prior~~Fair toValue ~~the~~Assumptions consummation of the merger with ITXC, certain ITXC employees contractually agreed to complete a predetermined service period in order to obtain agreed-upon retention bonuses. Receipt of these amounts is fully conditional upon completion of the entire service period. No other amounts are payable to these employees at the end of the service period. In the six months period ending June 30, 2005, some employees terminated their employment before the agreed upon-service period and other changes were made to the original terms of the contractual agreement of some employees. The Company is recognizing the total estimated liability of $3.3 million associated with this obligation on a pro-rata basis as services are provided. These amounts are included in accrued liabilities and selling, general and administrative expenses. The remaining liability is expected to be paid by the end of the third quarter of 2005.

The ~~following~~Company ~~table~~granted ~~displays~~120,000 ~~the~~stock options on January 31, 2005 at an ~~activity~~exercise price of $4.02 per share, 190,000 stock options on March 2, 2005 at an exercise price of $5.00 per share and ~~balances~~44,000 stock options on May 19, 2005 at an exercise price of $2.35. The exercise prices equal the ~~retention~~NASDAQ ~~bonus~~closing ~~liability~~price on the date of grants. The options vest at a rate of one third per year from ~~December~~the date of grant and terminate no later than seven years after the grant date. The weighted-average fair value of the options granted on January 31, ~~2004~~2005 tois ~~June~~$3.23 30per stock option, $4.03 per stock option granted on March 2, 2005 and ~~from~~$1.89 ~~May~~per 31stock tooption ~~June~~granted 30on May 19, ~~2004~~2005. The fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

(amounts in thousands)	Balance atDecember 31, 2004		Incurred		Amountspaid		Amountswritten-off		Ending balance atJune 30, 2005
	May 19, 2005		March 2, 2005		January 31, 2005
Retention bonuses	$	1,731	$	461	$	1,485	$	593	$	114
Expected life (in years)	6		6		6
(amounts in thousands)	Balance atMay 31, 2004		Incurred		Amountspaid		Amountswritten-off		Ending balance atJune 30, 2004
Risk-free interest rate	3.86	%	4.20	%	3.92	%
Retention bonuses	$	1,959	$	249	$	31	$	0	$	2,177
Volatility	100	%	100	%	100	%
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%	0	%

9.The ~~Employee~~following ~~Benefit~~table summarizes ~~Plans~~relevant information as to reported results under the Company’s intrinsic value method of accounting for stock options, with supplemental pro-forma information as if the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 had been applied for the periods indicated:

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost for pension benefits and other post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits:


(amounts in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005			Three Months Ended September 30, 2004			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Net loss	$	(7,868	)	$	(11,031	)	$	(16,714	)	$	(12,327	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			(3,958	)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders		(7,868	)		(11,031	)		(16,714	)		(16,285	)
Add: stock-based compensation, as reported pursuant to APB 25		7			15			24			20
Deduct: total stock-based compensation determined under fair value based methods for all awards		(1,358	)		(2,165	)		(4,431	)		(3,379	)

Pro-forma net loss, fair value method for all stock-based awards		(9,219	)		(13,181	)		(21,121	)		(19,644	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share, as reported	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.49	)

Pro-forma basic and diluted net loss per share, SFAS 123	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.60	)

(amounts in thousands)	Three Months EndedJune 30, 2005			Three Months EndedJune 30, 2004			Six Months EndedJune 30, 2005			Six Months EndedJune 30, 2004
Service cost	$	726		$	577		$	1,457		$	1,171
Interest cost		1,851			1,662			3,714			3,370
Return on assets		(2,257	)		(1,988	)		(4,529	)		(4,031	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	320		$	251		$	642		$	510

8. Common Stock and Earnings per Share

~~The~~During ~~Company did not contribute to its pension plans during~~ the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, ~~and~~stock ~~does~~options ~~not~~in ~~expect~~respect ~~to contribute to its pension plans during the remainder~~ of ~~2005~~97,977 ~~because~~and ~~the~~121,676 ~~plans~~common ~~are~~shares inwere aexercised ~~surplus~~for ~~position.~~cash ~~The~~consideration ~~Company~~of ~~contributed approximately~~ $33123,000 and $68178,000 ~~to its post-retirement health care and life insurance plan in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005~~ respectively ~~($nil for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004) and expects to contribute similar amounts in the remaining two quarters of 2005~~.

10. Interest Expense

Interest expense includes a recovery of $0.5 million and an interest expense of $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 respectively ($2.8 million and $5.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 respectively) representing the accretion of the Comfone AG liability to the amounts expected to be paid. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the recovery of interest expense of $0.5 million was recorded to reflect the final negotiated agreement with Comfone AG. The joint venture agreement, acquired as part of the acquisition of Old Teleglobe on May 30, 2003 as described in the Company’s annual Form 10-K, was terminated in January 2004, requiring the Company to pay Comfone AG its share of any cash derived from the mobile

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

~~global~~Basic ~~roaming~~earnings ~~business~~per ~~until~~share ~~the~~is ~~end~~calculated ofby ~~fiscal~~dividing ~~2004.~~net Atincome ~~the~~attributable ~~time~~to ofcommon ~~the~~stockholders ~~acquisition, management recorded its best estimate of~~ by the ~~fair~~weighted-average ~~value~~number of ~~the termination~~common ~~payment~~shares asoutstanding anduring ~~unfavorable contract in~~ the ~~purchase price allocation~~period.

~~The~~Diluted ~~three~~earnings ~~and~~per ~~six~~share ~~months~~is ~~ended~~determined ~~June~~in ~~30,~~the ~~2005~~same ~~include~~manner ~~$2.4~~as ~~million~~basic ~~(net~~earnings per share except that the number of ~~$0.4~~shares ~~million~~is ~~interest~~increased ~~capitalized)~~assuming exercise of dilutive stock options and ~~$4.8~~warrants ~~million~~using ~~(net~~the oftreasury $0stock method.7 ~~million~~The ~~interest~~diluted ~~capitalized)~~earnings ~~respectively,~~per ofshare ~~interest~~amount ~~expense~~equals ~~relating~~basic ~~to senior~~earnings ~~notes,~~per ~~with~~share abecause ~~related~~the ~~party,~~Company ~~issued~~had ina ~~the~~net ~~second~~loss ~~quarter~~and the impact of ~~2004~~the ~~($1.0~~assumed ~~million~~exercise ~~for~~of the ~~three~~stock options and ~~six~~warrants ~~months~~is ~~ended~~not ~~June 30, 2004)~~dilutive.

119. ~~Sale~~Retention ofBonuses ~~Property~~

OnPlan ~~June 30, 2005, as part~~ of ~~the~~Amalgamation ~~Company’s~~with ~~plan~~VSNL to reduce operational expenses, the Company disposed the land, building and office equipment located in the Burnaby Vancouver Station for $3.2 million in cash, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $2.2 million, net of transaction costs of $0.2 million.

12Following the Plan of Amalgamation announced on July 25, 2005 with VSNL, the Company implemented a retention program under which certain employees have to complete a predetermined service period in order to obtain agreed-upon retention bonuses. ~~Restructuring~~The ~~Charges~~Company is recognizing the estimated liability of $3.6 million associated with this obligation on a pro-rata basis as services are provided. The amount of $0.7 million is included in accrued liabilities and selling, general and administrative expenses to-date and the remaining liability of $2.9 million is expected to be recorded over the next two quarters and paid no later than May 1, 2006.

~~During~~ITXC ~~the~~Merger first quarter of 2004, the Company reduced its workforce by 15 people and incurred restructuring costs of $893,000 consisting of certain contractual amounts and other severance. As at June 30, 2004, the total severance liability was settled.

13Prior to the consummation of the merger with ITXC, certain ITXC employees contractually agreed to complete a predetermined service period in order to obtain agreed-upon retention bonuses. ~~Intangible~~Receipt ~~Assets~~of these amounts was conditional upon completion of the entire service period. No other amounts were payable to these employees at the end of the service period. In the nine-month period ending September 30, 2005, some employees terminated their employment before the agreed-upon service period and other changes were made to the original terms of the contractual agreement of some employees. These changes amounting to $595,000 are reflected as amounts written-off. The Company has recognized the total liability of $3.3 million associated with this obligation on a pro-rata basis as services were provided. These amounts were included in accrued liabilities and selling, general and administrative expenses. The remaining liability is expected to be paid by the end of 2005.

The following table ~~summarizes~~displays the ~~intangible~~activity ~~assets~~and atbalances of the ~~dates~~retention ~~indicated:~~bonus liability from December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005 and from May 31 to September 30, 2004 pursuant to the ITXC merger.

	June 30, 2005									December 31, 2004
(amounts in thousands)	Balance at December 31, 2004		Incurred			Amounts paid			Amounts written-off			Ending balance at September 30, 2005
(amounts in thousands)	GrossCarryingAmount		AccumulatedAmortization				Net			GrossCarryingAmount			AccumulatedAmortization			Net
Retention bonuses	$	1,731	$	461		$	1,584		$	595		$	13
Customer relationships	$	8,700	$	(3,696	)		$	5,004		$	8,700		$	(2,838	)	$	5,862
(amounts in thousands)	Balance at May 31, 2004		Incurred			Amounts paid			Amounts written-off			Ending balance at September 30, 2004
Other intangibles		2,121		(2,121	)			—			2,121			(2,121	)		—
Retention bonuses	$	1,959	$	660		$	485		$	0		$	2,134
Tradenames		700		(108	)			592			700			(58	)		642
Patents		6,500		(1,006	)			5,494			6,500			(542	)		5,958
Technology		16,400		(2,538	)			13,862			16,400			(1,367	)		15,033
Origination and termination contracts and related relationships		1,500		(300	)			1,200			1,500			(150	)		1,350
Software		27,338		(6,188	)			21,150			21,286			(3,777	)		17,509
Total intangible assets	$	63,259	$	(15,957	)		$	47,302		$	57,207		$	(10,853	)	$	46,354

The software acquired during the six months period ending June 30, 2005 is being amortized over its estimated useful life of three to five years. The weighted-average amortization period for acquired intangibles in the six months ended June 30, 2005 equals approximately 4.1 years.

Amortization expense for intangible assets totaled approximately $2.6 million and $5.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 respectively and $2.0 million and $3.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be:

Remainder of 2005	$	5.5 million
Year ending December 31, 2006	$	11.0 million
Year ending December 31, 2007	$	11.0 million
Year ending December 31, 2008	$	9.7 million
Year ending December 31, 2009	$	8.6 million

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

1410. ~~Property~~Employee ~~and~~Benefit ~~Equipment~~Plans

The following table presents the components of ~~property~~net periodic benefit cost for pension benefits and ~~equipment~~other ~~are~~post-retirement health ascare ~~follows~~and life insurance benefits:

	June 30,2005			December 31,2004
(amounts in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005			Three Months Ended September 30, 2004			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
	(amounts in thousands)
Service cost	$	734		$	586		$	2,191		$	1,757
Land	$	1,430		$	2,000
Interest cost		1,871			1,685			5,585			5,055
Telecommunications equipment		44,245			38,411
Return on assets		(2,282	)		(2,016	)		(6,811	)		(6,047	)
Buildings and equipment		4,827			4,681
Net periodic benefit cost	$	323		$	255		$	965		$	765
Cable systems		59,181			59,168
Computer equipment		4,920			4,240
Leasehold improvements		3,205			3,172
Construction in progress		9,925			8,395
		127,733			120,067
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(28,877	)		(19,280	)
		98,856			100,787
Leased property under capital leases		38,462			37,377
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(5,879	)		(4,081	)
		32,583			33,296
Property and equipment, net	$	131,439		$	134,083

15The Company did not contribute to its pension plans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and does not expect to contribute to its pension plans during the remainder of 2005 because the plans are in a surplus position. ~~Related~~The ~~Party~~Company contributed approximately $34,000 and $102,000 to its post-retirement health care and life insurance plan in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 respectively ($nil for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004) and expects to contribute a similar amount in the remaining last quarter of 2005.

~~The Company concluded the following transactions at exchange value with~~11. ~~related~~Interest ~~parties~~Expense ~~in the normal course of business.~~

(amounts in thousands)
Nature of transaction with therelated party	Classification in theCompany’s consolidatedfinancial statements	Three MonthsEndedJune 30, 2005		Three MonthsEndedJune 30, 2004		Six MonthsEndedJune 30, 2005		Six MonthsEndedJune 30, 2004
Cerberus and affiliates
Financing	Interest expense (1)	$	2,758	$	1,021	$	5,488	$	1,021
Preferred stock dividend	Preferred stock dividends to parent company	$	—	$	1,583	$	—	$	3,958

Interest expense includes an interest expense of $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (interest expense of $8.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004) representing the accretion of the Comfone AG liability to the amounts paid. During the second quarter of 2005, a recovery of interest expense of $0.5 million was recorded to reflect the final negotiated agreement reached with Comfone AG. The joint venture agreement, acquired as part of the acquisition of Old Teleglobe on May 30, 2003 as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, was terminated in January 2004 and required the Company to pay Comfone AG its share of any cash derived from the mobile global roaming business until the end of fiscal 2004. At the time of the acquisition, management recorded its best estimate of the fair value of the termination payment as an unfavorable contract in the purchase price allocation.

~~Amounts~~The ~~payable~~three ~~to related~~and ~~parties~~nine atmonths ~~June~~ended September 30, 2005 ~~total~~include $~~100~~2.3 million (net of $0.5 million interest capitalized) and $7.1 million (net of $1.2 million interest capitalized) respectively, of interest expense relating to senior notes, with a related party, issued in the second quarter of 2004 ($2.8 million and $~~100~~3.58 million atfor ~~December~~the 31three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 respectively).

~~(1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company capitalized approximately $0~~12.4 ~~million~~Disposal ~~and $0.7 million respectively~~ of ~~the total $2.8 million and $5.5 million of interest to property and equipment and software included in intangible assets ($nil for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004).~~Property

16On June 30, 2005, as part of the Company’s plan to reduce operational expenses, the Company disposed of the land, building and office equipment located in the Burnaby Vancouver Station for $3.2 ~~Contingencies~~million in cash, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $2.2 million, net of transaction costs of $0.2 million.

As previously reported, as part of its normal ongoing review of ITXC’s operations in connection with the post-merger integration of Teleglobe and ITXC, Teleglobe had identified potential instances of noncompliance with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) relating to ITXC’s operations in certain African countries prior to its merger with Teleglobe, consummated on May 31, 200413. ~~Teleglobe~~Restructuring ~~voluntarily~~Charges ~~notified the~~

During the first quarter of 2004, the Company reduced its workforce by 15 people and incurred restructuring costs of $893,000 consisting of certain contractual amounts and other severance. As at June 30, 2004, the total severance liability was settled.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

~~Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the U~~14.S. ~~Department~~Intangible ofAssets Justice (the “DOJ”) of the matter, and has been cooperating fully with the SEC and the DOJ. The SEC had previously advised Teleglobe that it was conducting an informal inquiry into the matter. Teleglobe has been informed that the SEC issued a formal order of investigation on February 15, 2005 concerning ITXC’s possible violations of the FCPA and possible related violations of the securities laws. On July 27, 2005, the SEC issued a subpoena to the Company for documents relating to its investigation. Teleglobe intends to continue to cooperate fully with the SEC and DOJ in the investigation. Teleglobe cannot predict the extent to which the SEC, the DOJ or any other governmental authorities will pursue administrative, civil or criminal proceedings, the imposition of fines or penalties or other remedies or sanctions. Teleglobe has not identified, and does not believe it is likely that, any material adjustment to its financial statements is or will be required in connection with the results of this investigation, although it is possible that a monetary penalty, if any, may be material to its results of operations in the period in which it is imposed.

On April 14, 2004, Acceris Communications Technologies, Inc. commenced a patent infringement suit in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey, against ITXC Corp., alleging that ITXC’s VoIP services and systems infringe Acceris’ U.S. Patent No. 6,243,373, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Implementing a Computer Network/Internet Telephone System.” On May 7, 2004, ITXC filed a lawsuit against Acceris for infringement of a number of ITXC’s VoIP patents. The ~~suit~~following ~~alleged~~table ~~infringement~~summarizes ~~of five of ITXC’s United States Patents, numbers 5,889,774, 6,026,087, 6,404,864, 6,628,760 and 6,661,878, directed generally to~~ the ~~transmission~~intangible ofassets ~~telephone~~at ~~calls over~~ the ~~Internet~~dates ~~and~~indicated: the completion of telephone calls by switching them off the Internet and onto a public switched telephone network (PSTN). On July 6, 2004, the Court rejected Acceris’ initial motion to dismiss ITXC’s case based upon alleged failure to conduct an adequate pre-complaint investigation. The Company intends to vigorously defend against the allegations of infringement in that case and believes it has substantial defenses to them. However, an adverse result in this litigation could either result in injunctive relief precluding all or a portion of ITXC’s VoIP activity or materially impact the Company’s revenue and profitability. Litigation of such matters may require significant management and financial resources of the Company and adverse outcomes in such lawsuits could materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results.

ITXC and certain of its former officers/directors were named as defendants in several purported shareholder class action lawsuits commenced in 2001. The lawsuits allege, among other things, that, in connection with ITXC’s public offerings of securities, its Prospectus did not disclose certain alleged practices involving its underwriters and their customers. These actions seek compensatory and other damages, and costs and expenses associated with the litigation. No discovery has taken place with respect to ITXC and the other issuer defendants. ITXC is one of hundreds of issuers named as defendants in substantially identical lawsuits. Management believes that ITXC and its officers/directors did not engage in any improper or illegal conduct. All of these cases have been consolidated for pretrial purposes before Judge Scheindlin in the Southern District of New York, who refused to dismiss the cases in an opinion issued in February 2003. All of the individual defendants who had been named as defendants in the Company’s case have now been dismissed from the proceeding without prejudice, pursuant to a stipulation with the plaintiffs. Neither the individual defendants nor the Company nor its insurers paid any consideration for these dismissals. The issuer defendants, their insurance carriers and the plaintiffs have negotiated a settlement pursuant to which the insurance carriers would fund any monetary consideration, and it is anticipated that this proposed settlement will be submitted to the Court for approval in the near future. This settlement was approved by the court on February 15, 2005 on a preliminary basis. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the Company would be dismissed from the litigation with prejudice and should neither have future liability to plaintiffs nor any significant expenses in connection with the litigation, except for a limited obligation to cooperate in discovery in the plaintiffs’ continuing cases against the underwriters.


	September 30, 2005							December 31, 2004
(amounts in thousands)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer relationships	$	8,700	$	(4,125	)	$	4,575	$	8,700	$	(2,838	)	$	5,862
Other intangibles		2,121		(2,121	)		—		2,121		(2,121	)		—
Tradenames		700		(133	)		567		700		(58	)		642
Patents		6,500		(1,238	)		5,262		6,500		(542	)		5,958
Technology		16,400		(3,124	)		13,276		16,400		(1,367	)		15,033
Origination and termination contracts and related relationships		1,500		(375	)		1,125		1,500		(150	)		1,350
Software		28,859		(7,572	)		21,287		21,286		(3,777	)		17,509
Distribution rights		2,039		(157	)		1,882		—		—			—

Total intangible assets	$	66,819	$	(18,845	)	$	47,974	$	57,207	$	(10,853	)	$	46,354

The software acquired during the nine-month period ending September 30, 2005 is being amortized over its estimated useful life of three to five years. The amount recorded under distribution rights represents the cash consideration paid to-date allocated to the exclusive distribution rights to Wmode’s proprietary technology and is being amortized over a five-year period. The weighted-average amortization period for acquired intangibles in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 equals approximately 4.6 years.

Amortization expense for intangible assets totaled approximately $2.9 million and $8.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 respectively and $2.9 million and $6.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be:


Remainder of 2005	$	2.9 million
Year ending December 31, 2006	$	11.7 million
Year ending December 31, 2007	$	11.7 million
Year ending December 31, 2008	$	10.4 million
Year ending December 31, 2009	$	6.4 million

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

We are routinely party to suits for collection, commercial disputes, claims from customers and/or suppliers over reconciliation of payments for voice minutes, circuits, Internet bandwidth and/or access to the public switched telephone network, leased equipment, and claims from estates of bankrupt companies alleging that we received preferential payments from such companies prior to their bankruptcy filings15. ~~While~~Property ~~management currently believes that resolving such suits~~ and ~~claims,~~Equipment individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position, the FCPA investigation and other litigation proceedings noted above are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, such an outcome could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.

~~17.~~The ~~Subsequent~~components ~~Events~~of property and equipment are as follows:

i) Plan of Amalgamation


	September 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
	(amounts in thousands)
Land	$	1,430		$	2,000
Telecommunications equipment		46,622			38,411
Buildings and equipment		4,959			4,681
Cable systems		57,219			59,168
Computer equipment		4,961			4,240
Leasehold improvements		4,691			3,172
Construction in progress		12,627			8,395

		132,509			120,067
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(33,028	)		(19,280	)

		99,481			100,787
Leased property under capital leases		39,616			37,377
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(6,875	)		(4,081	)

		32,741			33,296

Property and equipment, net	$	132,222		$	134,083

On July 258, 2005, the Company ~~entered~~provided ~~into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (the “Amalgamation Agreement”) with Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (“VSNL”) and VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd.,~~ a ~~wholly~~first-ranking ~~owned~~collateral ~~subsidiary~~hypothec of VSNL (“Amalgamation Sub”). Pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, which is subject to approvals and closing conditions, Teleglobe will be amalgamated with Amalgamation Sub, and the resulting company will be a wholly owned subsidiary of VSNL (the “Amalgamation”). At the effective time of the Amalgamation, each common share of Teleglobe issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares, if any, held directly or indirectly by Teleglobe, VSNL, Amalgamation Sub or any Teleglobe shareholder that has properly perfected its right to appraisal for such shares in accordance with the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda (the “Companies Act”)) will be exchanged for the right to receive $43.500 ~~per~~million ~~share,~~Canadian ~~all in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act and the Amalgamation Agreement. Upon consummation of the Amalgamation~~dollars, ~~each option~~expiring to purchase common shares of Teleglobe outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation that has an exercise price per share less than $4.50 (whether or not then exercisable or vested) will entitle the holder thereof to the right to receive a cash payment in anJanuary ~~aggregate amount equal to the product of (A) the excess of $4.50 over the exercise price per share of such option and (B) the number of shares subject to such option~~2018, ~~and~~on ~~such~~one ~~option will be terminated and cancelled immediately prior to such effective time. Upon consummation~~ of ~~the~~its ~~Amalgamation,~~properties ~~each option~~ to ~~purchase common shares of Teleglobe outstanding immediately prior to~~ the ~~effective~~lessor ~~time~~ of ~~the~~its ~~Amalgamation~~administrative ~~that has an exercise price per share equal to or greater than $4~~premises.50 will automatically be terminated and cancelled, without any consideration, as of such effective time. Upon consummation of the Amalgamation, each warrant to purchase common shares of Teleglobe outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation (whether or not then exercisable or vested) shall entitle the holder thereof to the right to receive, upon exercise and payment of any applicable warrant consideration, a cash payment in an aggregate amount equal to the product of (A) $4.50 and (B) the number of shares subject to such warrant.

~~Teleglobe’s Board of Directors has approved the Amalgamation Agreement~~16. ~~The~~Related ~~Amalgamation~~Party is conditioned on, among other things, the approval of the Amalgamation Agreement by the required vote of shareholders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares in Teleglobe’s common share capital, expiration or termination of any waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended and other applicable antitrust laws, the receipt of certain regulatory approvals specified in the Amalgamation Agreement, expiration of the time period for any applicable review process by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States without any action or recommendation by such committee to prevent consummation of the Amalgamation, and the number of shares of shareholders properly exercising their appraisal rights pursuant to the Companies Act does not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the outstanding Teleglobe’s common shares capital. The Amalgamation Agreement also includes certain termination rights and

The Company concluded the following transactions at exchange value with related parties in the normal course of business.


(amounts in thousands)
Nature of transaction with the related party	Classification in the Company’s consolidated financial statements	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005		Three Months Ended September 30, 2004		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Cerberus and affiliates
Financing	Interest expense (1)	$	2,786	$	2,786	$	8,274	$	3,807
Preferred stock dividends	Preferred stock dividends to parent company	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,958

Amounts payable to related parties at September 30, 2005 total $100.3 million and $100.5 million at December 31, 2004.

(1)

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company capitalized approximately $0.5 million and $1.2 million respectively of the total $2.8 million and $8.3 million of interest to property and equipment and software included in intangible assets ($nil for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004).

17. Contingencies

As previously reported, as part of its normal ongoing review of ITXC ‘s operations in connection with the post-merger integration of Teleglobe and ITXC, Teleglobe had identified potential instances of noncompliance with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) relating to ITXC’s operations in certain African

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

~~provides~~countries ~~that,~~prior ~~upon~~to ~~termination~~its ofmerger ~~the~~with ~~Amalgamation~~Teleglobe, ~~Agreement~~consummated ~~under~~on ~~certain circumstances~~May 31, 2004. Teleglobe ~~would~~voluntarily benotified ~~required~~the toSecurities ~~pay~~and ~~VSNL~~Exchange aCommission ~~termination~~(the “SEC”) ~~fee~~and ofthe $4U.~~5 million~~S. InDepartment ~~addition,~~of Justice (the ~~Amalgamation~~“DOJ”) ~~agreement~~of ~~includes~~the ~~certain~~matter, ~~interim~~and ~~operating~~has ~~covenants,~~been ~~subject~~cooperating tofully ~~certain~~with ~~exceptions,~~the SEC and the DOJ. The SEC had previously advised Teleglobe that ~~required~~it was conducting an informal inquiry into the matter. Teleglobe tohas ~~obtain~~been ~~VSNL~~informed that the SEC issued a formal order of investigation on February 15, 2005 concerning ITXC’s ~~prior~~possible ~~written~~violations ~~consent,~~of ~~which~~the ~~consent~~FCPA ~~may~~and ~~not~~possible berelated ~~unreasonably~~violations ~~withheld,~~of ~~for taking~~the ~~certain~~securities ~~actions~~laws. InOn ~~connection~~July 27, ~~with~~2005, the ~~signed~~SEC issued ~~Amalgamation~~a ~~Agreement,~~subpoena to the Company ~~incurred~~for ~~professional~~documents ~~fees~~relating ~~from~~to its ~~financial~~investigation. ~~advisor~~Teleglobe inintends to continue to cooperate fully with the ~~amount~~SEC ofand ~~$900,000.~~DOJ ~~The~~in ~~fees~~the ~~became~~investigation. ~~due~~Teleglobe ~~upon~~cannot predict the ~~execution~~extent ofto which the ~~Amalgamation~~SEC, ~~Agreement~~the onDOJ ~~July~~or any other 25governmental authorities will pursue administrative, ~~2005.~~civil ~~The~~or ~~remaining~~criminal ~~portion~~proceedings, the imposition of ~~the~~fines ~~fees~~or penalties or other remedies or sanctions. Teleglobe has not identified, and does not believe it is likely that, any material adjustment to its financial statements is or will ~~become~~be ~~due~~required ~~upon~~in ~~consummation~~connection with the results of this investigation, although it is possible that a monetary penalty, if any, may be material to its results of operations in the ~~Amalgamation.~~period in which it is imposed.

InOn ~~connection~~April 14, ~~with~~2004, ~~the~~Acceris ~~execution~~Communications ofTechnologies, Inc. ~~the~~commenced ~~Amalgamation~~a ~~Agreement,~~patent ~~Teleglobe~~infringement ~~Bermuda~~suit ~~Holdings~~in ~~Ltd,~~the anUnited ~~affiliate~~States District Court of ~~Cerberus~~the ~~Capital~~District ~~Management~~of New Jersey, Lagainst ITXC Corp.P., ~~and~~alleging ~~the holder~~that ofITXC’s ~~approximately~~VoIP ~~66.2%~~services ofand ~~Teleglobe~~systems infringe Acceris’s ~~outstanding~~U.S. ~~common~~Patent ~~shares~~No. 6,243,373, ~~has~~entitled “Method ~~executed~~and aApparatus ~~voting~~for ~~agreement~~Implementing ~~with~~a ~~VSNL~~Computer ~~pursuant~~Network/Internet toTelephone ~~which~~System.” itOn ~~agreed~~May 7, to2004, ~~vote~~ITXC ~~its~~filed ~~Teleglobe~~a ~~shares~~lawsuit inagainst ~~favor~~Acceris for infringement of ~~the~~a ~~Amalgamation~~number ~~Agreement~~of ~~and~~ITXC’s ~~the~~VoIP ~~Amalgamation~~patents. ~~and~~The ~~against any~~suit ~~alternative~~alleged ~~transaction,~~infringement ~~not~~of tofive of ~~transfer~~ITXC’s ~~its~~United ~~Teleglobe~~States ~~shares~~Patents, ~~and~~numbers ~~not~~5,889,774, to6,026,087, ~~take~~6,404,864, ~~certain~~6,628,760 ~~actions~~and ~~specified~~6,661,878, ~~therein~~directed generally to ~~encourage~~the ortransmission ~~facilitate~~of ~~any~~telephone ~~such~~calls ~~alternative~~over ~~transaction.~~the ~~The~~Internet ~~voting~~and ~~agreement~~the ~~also~~completion ~~provides~~of ~~for~~telephone ~~Teleglobe~~calls ~~Bermuda~~by ~~Holdings~~switching ~~Ltd to~~them ~~pay~~off tothe Internet ~~VSNL~~and ~~75%~~onto ofa ~~any~~public ~~proceeds~~switched intelephone ~~excess~~network ~~of $4~~(PSTN).50 ~~per~~On ~~share~~July 6, ~~that~~2004, ~~may~~the beCourt ~~received~~rejected ~~for~~Acceris’ ~~its~~initial ~~Teleglobe~~motion ~~shares~~to ifdismiss ~~the~~ITXC’s ~~Amalgamation~~case ~~Agreement~~based isupon ~~terminated~~alleged ~~under~~failure ~~certain~~to ~~circumstances.~~conduct ~~Certain~~an ~~trusts~~adequate ~~affiliated~~pre-complaint ~~with~~investigation. ~~Gerald~~The Company ~~Porter~~intends ~~Strong,~~to ~~president~~vigorously ~~and chief~~defend ~~executive~~against ~~officer~~the allegations of ~~Teleglobe,~~infringement ~~and~~in ~~with~~that ~~Richard~~case D.and ~~Willett~~believes ~~II,~~it ~~chief~~has ~~operating~~substantial ~~officer~~defenses ofto ~~Teleglobe~~them. However, ~~have~~an ~~executed~~adverse ~~similar~~result ~~voting~~in ~~agreements~~this ~~with~~litigation ~~VSNL.~~could ~~Each~~either ofresult ~~the~~in ~~above-referenced~~injunctive ~~voting~~relief ~~agreements~~precluding ~~will~~all ~~terminate~~or ona portion ~~the~~of ~~earliest~~ITXC’s toVoIP ~~occur~~activity ~~of (i)~~or ~~the~~materially ~~effective~~impact ~~time of~~ the ~~Amalgamation,~~Company’s ~~(ii)~~revenue ~~the~~and ~~termination~~profitability. Litigation of such ~~voting~~matters ~~agreement~~may byrequire ~~the~~significant ~~mutual~~management ~~written~~and ~~agreement~~financial resources of the ~~parties~~Company ~~thereto,~~ and ~~(iii)~~adverse ~~the~~outcomes ~~date~~in ofsuch ~~termination~~lawsuits ofcould materially ~~the~~adversely ~~Amalgamation~~affect ~~Agreement~~our financial condition or operating results.

~~ii)~~ITXC ~~Operating~~and ~~Lease~~certain of its former officers/directors were named as defendants in several purported shareholder class action lawsuits commenced in 2001. The lawsuits allege, among other things, that, in connection with ITXC’s public offerings of securities, its Prospectus did not disclose certain alleged practices involving its underwriters and their customers. These actions seek compensatory and other damages, and costs and expenses associated with the litigation. No discovery has taken place with respect to ITXC and the other issuer defendants. ITXC is one of hundreds of issuers named as defendants in substantially identical lawsuits. Management believes that ITXC and its officers/directors did not engage in any improper or illegal conduct. All of these cases have been consolidated for ~~Administrative~~pretrial ~~Office~~purposes before Judge Scheindlin in the Southern District of New York, who refused to dismiss the cases in an opinion issued in February 2003. All of the individual defendants who had been named as defendants in the Company’s case have now been dismissed from the proceeding without prejudice, pursuant to a stipulation with the plaintiffs. Neither the individual defendants nor the Company nor its insurers paid any consideration for these dismissals. The issuer defendants, their insurance carriers and the plaintiffs have negotiated a settlement pursuant to which the insurance carriers would fund any monetary consideration, and it is anticipated that this proposed settlement will be submitted to the Court for approval in the near future. This settlement was approved by the court on February 15, 2005 on a preliminary basis. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the Company would be dismissed from the litigation with prejudice and should neither have future liability to plaintiffs nor any significant expenses in connection with the litigation, except for a limited obligation to cooperate in discovery in the plaintiffs’ continuing cases against the underwriters.

On July 8, 2005, the Company signed a new lease agreement for its administrative premises with an initial term of 15 years ending December 31, 2020. The total lease payments amounting to approximately $16.2 million have been included in Note 19, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Company’s 2004 audited annual Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company provided the lessor a first-ranking collateral hypothec of $3.0 million Canadian dollars over one of its properties.

18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. SFAS 153 requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company’s adoption of this standard did not have any impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2004, the FASB released its final revised standard, SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R requires that a public entity measure the cost of equity based service awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award or the vesting period. A public entity will initially measure the cost of liability based service awards based on its current fair value; the fair value of that award will be remeasured subsequently at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that period. Adoption of SFAS 123R is required for the fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is evaluating SFAS 123R and believes the impact on the financial statements should be consistent with the FAS 123 pro forma disclosure contained in Note 6 of the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

InWe ~~May~~are ~~2005,~~routinely ~~the~~party ~~FASB~~to ~~issued~~suits ~~SFAS~~for ~~154~~collection, ~~Accounting~~commercial ~~Changes~~disputes, ~~and~~claims ~~Error~~from ~~Corrections.~~customers ~~SFAS 154~~and/or ~~eliminates~~suppliers ~~the~~over ~~requirement~~reconciliation inof ~~APB~~payments ~~Opinion~~for ~~No.~~voice 20minutes, ~~Accounting Changes~~circuits, toInternet ~~include~~bandwidth and/or access to the ~~cumulative~~public ~~effect~~switched telephone network, leased equipment, and claims from estates of ~~changes~~bankrupt incompanies ~~accounting~~alleging ~~principle~~that inwe ~~the~~received ~~income~~preferential payments ~~statement~~from insuch ~~the~~companies ~~period~~prior ofto ~~change~~their bankruptcy filings. ~~Instead,~~While tomanagement ~~enhance~~currently ~~the~~believes ~~comparability~~that ofresolving ~~prior~~such ~~period financial~~suits ~~statements~~and claims, ~~SFAS~~individually ~~154~~or ~~requires~~in ~~that~~aggregate, ~~changes~~will innot ~~accounting~~have ~~principle~~a bematerial ~~retrospectively~~adverse ~~applied.~~impact ~~Under~~on ~~the~~our ~~retrospective~~financial ~~application~~position, the ~~new~~FCPA investigation ~~accounting~~and ~~principle~~other islitigation ~~applied~~proceedings asnoted ofabove ~~the~~are ~~beginning~~subject ofto ~~the~~inherent ~~first~~uncertainties ~~period~~and ~~presented~~management’s asview ifof ~~that principle~~these ~~had~~matters ~~always~~may ~~been~~change ~~used.~~in ~~Adoption~~the offuture. ~~SFAS~~Were ~~154~~an isunfavorable ~~required~~final ~~for~~outcome ~~accounting~~to ~~changes~~occur, ~~and~~such ~~corrections~~an ofoutcome ~~errors~~could ~~made~~have ina ~~the~~material adverse ~~fiscal~~impact ~~year~~on ~~beginning~~our ~~after~~financial ~~December~~position ~~15,~~and ~~2005.~~results ~~The~~of ~~Company~~operations ~~will~~for ~~adopt~~the ~~this~~period ~~new~~in ~~accounting~~which ~~standard~~the oneffect ~~January~~becomes ~~1st,~~reasonably ~~2006~~estimable.

18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. SFAS 153 requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company’s adoption of this standard did not have any impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2004, the FASB released its final revised standard, SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R requires that a public entity measure the cost of equity based service awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award or the vesting period. A public entity will initially measure the cost of liability based service awards based on its current fair value; the fair value of that award will be remeasured subsequently at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that period. Adoption of SFAS 123R is required for the fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company evaluated SFAS 123R and believes the impact on the financial statements should be consistent with the SFAS 123 pro forma disclosure contained in Note 7 of the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SFAS 154 eliminates the requirement in APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, to include the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle in the income statement in the period of change. Instead, to enhance the comparability of prior period financial statements, SFAS 154 requires that changes in accounting principle be retrospectively applied. Under the retrospective application, the new accounting principle is applied as of the beginning of the first period presented as if that principle had always been used. Adoption of SFAS 154 is required for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company will adopt this new accounting standard on January 1, 2006.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements, the related Notes to audited Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Company’s ~~annual~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended ~~December~~ December 31, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2005 and the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The Company has included in this Quarterly Report certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning TIH’s business, operations and financial condition. “Forward-looking statements” consist of all non-historical information, and the analysis of historical information, including any references in this Quarterly Report to future revenue growth, future expense growth, future credit exposure, future profitability, anticipated cash resources, anticipated capital expenditures, capital requirements, and the Company’s plans for future periods. In addition, the words “could”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “objective”, “plan”, “may affect”, “may depend”, “believes”, “estimates”, “projects” and similar words and phrases are also intended to identify such forward-looking statements.

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the Company’s forward-looking statements due to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, (i) uncertainties inherent in the execution of the Company’s Amalgamation Agreement with VSNL, including but not limited to, transactions costs, retention of key employees and customers through the acquisition process, the risk of approval with requirements, limitations or costs, disapproval, or delay by governmental entities of the proposed transaction, the risks of delay in consummation of the transaction, the existence of undisclosed or unanticipated contingent liabilities, that material adverse changes to either entity may prevent the transaction from closing and (ii) other risks, including the volatile and competitive environment for telecommunications; changes in domestic and foreign economic, market and regulatory conditions; the inherent uncertainty of financial estimates and projections; uncertainty inherent in litigation; unanticipated technological difficulties; the risk that the Company may not be able to access sufficient capital; the creditworthiness of and relationship with our customers; the Company’s debt level and the inherent lack of ~~flexibility~~ flexibility resulting thereof; future transactions and risks inherent in being subject to significant regulation. (See also discussion on Risk Factors on page 48 of the Company’s ~~annual~~Annual Report on Form 10-K).) All such forward-looking statements are current only as of the date on which such statements were made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which any such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

More details on the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation are provided in the Company’s ~~Form~~Definitive ~~8-K~~Proxy Statement filed ~~July~~on 25September 26, 2005 and in Note 172 of the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

The results of operations contained in the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 and 2004 are results of operations for such interim periods and are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for an entire year or for any other period.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the FASB released its final revised standard, SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based ~~provide~~Payment. SFAS 123R requires that a public entity measure the cost of equity based service awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award or the vesting period. A public entity will initially measure the cost of liability based service awards based on its current fair value; the fair value of that award will be remeasured subsequently at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that period. Adoption of SFAS 123R is required for the fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company isevaluated ~~evaluating~~ SFAS 123R and believes the impact on the financial statements should be consistent with the ~~FAS~~SFAS 123 pro -forma disclosure contained in Note 67 of the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SFAS 154 eliminates the requirement in APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, to include the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle in the income statement in the period of change. Instead, to enhance the comparability of prior period financial statements, SFAS 154 requires that changes in accounting principle be retrospectively applied. Under the retrospective application, the new accounting principle is applied as of the beginning of the first period presented as if that principle had always been used. Adoption of SFAS 154 is required for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company will adopt this new accounting standard on January ~~1st~~ 1, 2006.

ITXC Integration Plan

The following is an update on the Company’s ITXC integration plan:

The Company’s ITXC merger integration plan was to achieve annual post-merger benefits of approximately $25 to $30 million ~~continued to progress in the second quarter of 2005~~. The integration plan centered around facility and headcount reductions, termination cost savings and consolidation of the Teleglobe and ITXC networks resulting in reduced capital expenditures. The original completion date was set for the first quarter of 2005, however, ~~there~~we ~~was~~continue ato ~~delay~~experience offurther ~~one~~delays ~~quarter~~in ~~from~~ the ~~original~~integration ~~plan~~of ~~exclusively~~the ~~related~~voice tosystems ~~planned integration of routing capabilities~~deployment. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, the Company has substantially completed the integration plan and estimates that $22.5 million of ~~the~~ annualized post-merger benefits have been realized with the remaining benefits ~~from unified routing~~ expected to be realized ~~over~~in the ~~next two quarters~~future. Prior to the ~~acquisition~~ ofCompany’s ~~ITXC~~merger bywith ~~the Company~~ITXC, ITXC stand alone, reported a negative EBITDA of $27.8 million, including unusual charges of $7.3 million, for its twelve months ended December 31, 2003. Integration costs, including consultant fees, severances and retention bonuses and other costs directly related to the integration of ITXC, of approximately $1.3 million, are included in the consolidated results of operations for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 ($nil in the current quarter).

ITXC access to Teleglobe IP network and Teleglobe connectivity:

The combination of Teleglobe and ITXC provided opportunities to lower the operating expenses of our network, resulting in a decrease in network expenses. IP access charges isare a significant example. ITXC on a stand-alone basis purchased IP access services from Teleglobe as well as other competitive wholesale IP service carriers. We have cancelled many of these third-party services, replacing access via Teleglobe’s network. The marginal cost of doing so is very low, yielding operating expense reductions.

We have also realized network savings in the short-term by migrating some common customers from two interconnects to one, improving utilization rates. This provides us growth capacity with lower investment requirements for a period of time. In the longer term, we anticipate benefits from network growth via VoIP, an inherently more cost effective medium than TDM. To date, the Company has achieved its integration goal related to network consolidation. The benefits of our completed network consolidation isare reflected in our network expenses.

Facilities and headcount reductions:

To date, the Company has achieved its integration goal related to closures of overlapping facilities. Further savings may be achieved from the sublet of excess floor space. The two first quarters of 2005 have not been significantly impacted by savings from headcount reductions mainly because the results include retention bonus earned in the period. However, SG&A for the third quarter of 2005 and onwards is expected to reflect net benefits from these reductions.

~~Termination~~Facilities ~~cost~~and ~~savings~~headcount reductions:

InThe ~~the~~Company ~~future,~~has ~~due~~achieved toits ~~the~~integration ~~nature~~goal ofrelated ~~the~~to ~~international~~closures ~~wholesale~~of overlapping ~~voice industry~~facilities, ~~the~~including ~~increase in volume from~~ the ~~merger~~sublet ~~with ITXC~~of ~~will~~excess ~~result~~floor inspace. ~~termination~~For ~~cost savings for~~ the ~~combined~~six-month ~~company~~period ~~with~~ending ~~other~~June 30, ~~carriers.~~2005, ~~The~~savings ~~integration~~from ofheadcount ~~the~~reduction ~~combined~~have ~~company~~not ~~least~~been ~~cost~~significant ~~routing~~mainly ~~capabilities~~because ~~will allow~~ the ~~combined~~results ~~company~~include toretention ~~route~~bonus ~~traffic~~earned ~~using the lowest cost available~~ in ~~any~~ of the ~~combined company’s routes~~ period. ~~While our benefits to date are limited~~However, weSG&A ~~anticipate~~for the ~~synergies~~third toquarter ~~occur~~of in2005 ~~the~~reflects ~~future~~net ~~now~~benefits ~~that~~from wethese ~~have completed the unification of routing~~reductions.

Results of Operations—Comparison of the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 and 2004

Set forth below is a description of the results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 and ~~June~~ September 30, 2004. The results of ITXC are included in the consolidated results of operations from June 1, 2004. Thus, the results of ITXC are included in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 and ~~from~~in ~~June~~the three months ended September 30, 2004 and from June 1, 2004 in the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2004.

Non-GAAP Financial Data (Unaudited)

We are presenting EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) because management considers it an important supplemental measure of our performance and believe that it is frequently used by interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry, in particular in connection with offerings of debt securities. However, EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

•

EBITDA does not reflect cash expenditures, future requirements for capital expenditures, or contractual commitments;

•

EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs;

•

EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on debt;

•

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

•

EBITDA reflects the impact on earnings of charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; and

•

Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to our company to invest in its business. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on the GAAP results and using EBITDA only inas a supplemental measure of our performance.

EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)

(amounts in thousands)	Three Months ~~EndedJune~~Ended September 30, 2005			Three Months ~~EndedJune~~Ended September 30, 2004			~~Six~~Nine Months ~~EndedJune~~Ended September 30, 2005			~~Six~~Nine Months ~~EndedJune~~Ended September 30, 2004
Net loss	$	(~~401~~7,868	)	$	(311,~~776~~031	)	$	(816,~~846~~714	)	$	(112,~~296~~327	)
Add:
Interest, net		2,~~101~~369			36,~~821~~271			68,~~033~~402			612,~~210~~481
Income taxes		~~(299~~133	)		(~~2,345~~165	)		(~~586~~453	)		(2,~~197~~362	)
Depreciation		5,~~762~~559			57,~~108~~059			1217,~~009~~568			916,~~237~~295
Amortization expense		2,648			1,960			5,103			3,363
Amortization		2,909			2,869			8,012			6,233
EBITDA	$	93,~~811~~102		$	45,~~768~~003		$	1316,~~713~~815		$	1520,~~317~~320

The Company’s EBITDA for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 ~~includes~~include a ~~non-recurring~~favorable impact ~~gain~~ of $21.28 million ~~relating~~ in telecommunication expense due to the ~~disposal~~revision of estimates on disputed accounts payables and accrued liabilities with certain carriers, the ~~Burnaby~~benefit ~~Vancouver~~associated ~~Station~~with negotiated retroactive rate adjustments totaling $1.6 million ~~See~~on ~~Note~~certain 11contracts ofand non-recurring special charges incurred in SG&A in connection with the ~~unaudited~~Plan ~~interim~~of ~~Consolidated~~Amalgamation ~~Financial~~with ~~Statements~~VSNL ~~included~~totaling ~~herein~~$6.8 million and $7.9 million respectively for ~~more~~the ~~details~~two periods.

InFor ~~addition, for~~ the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, the Company’s operating results include $3.0 million of revenue due to major favorable settlement agreements with certain carriers ~~and $0~~.9 ~~million~~Additionally, offor ~~similar favorable agreements in network expense. For~~ the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, the Company’s telecommunication expense ~~was~~and network expense were reduced by major favorable settlements with certain carriers for approximately $25.7 million and $50.79 million respectively.

The nine months ended September 30, 2005 also includes a non-recurring net gain of $2.2 million relating to the disposal of the Burnaby Vancouver Station. See Note 12 of the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for more details.

Revenues

The following table presents revenues derived from each product group and other relevant revenue-related information for the periods indicated. The results of ITXC are included from June 1, 2004.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005			Three Months Ended June 30, 2004			Six Months Ended June 30, 2005			Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
	Three Months Ended September 30,2005			Three Months Ended September 30,2004			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Revenues per line of business (in millions of U.S. dollars)
Voice—transport	$	~~190~~191		$	~~183~~226		$	~~396~~587		$	~~349~~575
Data—transport		25			26			5176			5480
Value—added services		2428			2225			4775			4267
Total	$	~~239~~244		$	~~231~~277		$	~~494~~738		$	~~445~~722
Total revenues excluding Bell Canada (1) revenues	$	~~215~~222		$	~~211~~251		$	~~443~~665		$	~~403~~654
Minutes of traffic (in millions)
Voice—transport		3,~~328~~470			23,~~444~~297			610,~~760~~230			47,~~536~~833
Other		7078			5361			~~134~~212			~~102~~163
Total		3,~~398~~548			23,~~497~~358			610,~~894~~442			47,~~638~~996
Average voice revenue per minute	$	0.~~057~~055		$	0.~~075~~069		$	0.~~059~~058		$	0.~~077~~073
Percentage of revenues from Bell Canada (1)		108.18	%		89.63	%		109.49	%		9.53	%
Number of customers at period-end		1,~~487~~574			1,~~328~~346			1,~~487~~574			1,~~328~~346
Geographic distribution of revenues
Asia		7	%		98	%		78	%		9	%
Canada		1514	%		1113	%		1514	%		12	%
Europe		3234	%		2829	%		33	%		29	%
USA		31	%		3533	%		31	%		34	%
Latin America		4	%		4	%		4	%		54	%
Other		1110	%		13	%		10	%		1112	%
Total		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

(1)	Bell Canada is Canada’s largest telecommunications company.

~~Total~~Overall revenues, excluding revenues from Bell Canada, increased by $4.2 million or 2.0% in the current quarter as compared to the same prior year period, and by $40.2 million or 10.0% in the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The increase in revenues, excluding the Bell Canada revenue, mainly results from the inclusion of ITXC revenue from June 1, 2004. Revenues from Bell Canada increased by $4.4 million or 22.0% in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and by $9.1 million or 21.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The increase is mainly due to abnormally low volume with Bell Canada in both comparative periods of 2004. The number of customers in the current quarter-end represents an increase of 159, including customers obtained through the merger with ITXC, as compared to June 30, 2004.

Total revenues, excluding revenues from Bell Canada, decreased by $28.8 million or 11.5% in the current quarter as compared to the same prior year quarter. The decrease in revenues mainly results from voice

~~Revenue generated from voice~~ transport’s ~~services~~current ~~increased~~competitive bypricing ~~approximately $7~~trends.4 ~~million~~For ~~or 4.0 % in~~ the ~~current~~ ~~quarter as compared~~ year-to-date ~~the same prior year~~ period. ~~For the six months~~ ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, ~~revenue~~total ~~generated~~revenues, ~~from~~excluding ~~voice~~revenues ~~transport~~from Bell Canada, increased by $4711.75 million or ~~13.7% as compared to the same prior year period. The increase is mainly explained by the inclusion of ITXC revenue from June~~ 1~~, 2004 and from an increase in minutes of traffic carried in both comparable periods~~. ~~Minutes of traffic carried in the current quarter versus the same quarter in 2004 increased by 36.2~~8% ~~and increased by 49.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as~~ compared to the same period in 2004. The increase isin ~~mainly~~revenues ~~due~~results tofrom the inclusion of ITXC ~~related~~revenue ~~minutes~~ from June 1, 2004 ~~while~~partially ~~excluding such volume for the first five months of 2004. The increase in revenue was~~ offset by the ~~current~~ competitive pricing trends in the ~~telecommunication~~ telecommunications industry.

~~During~~Revenues ~~the~~from ~~quarter~~Bell ~~and~~Canada ~~the~~decreased ~~six~~by ~~months~~$4.2 ~~ended~~million or ~~June~~16.4% in the quarter ended September 30, 2005, ~~the~~as ~~average~~compared ~~voice~~to ~~revenue~~the ~~per~~quarter ~~minute~~ended ~~was~~September 30, ~~approximately $0~~2004.~~057~~ ~~and~~The ~~$0.059~~decline asis ~~compared~~mostly ~~with $0.075~~explained ~~and~~by ~~$0.077~~higher ~~per~~volume ~~minute~~in ~~during~~ the third quarter of 2004 and by the ~~six~~repricing of Bell’s IP service in 2005. In the nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, ~~2004~~2005, ~~respectively.~~revenues ~~The~~from ~~decrease~~Bell inCanada ~~average~~increased ~~revenue~~by ~~per~~$4.8 ~~minutes~~million ~~was~~or ~~primarily~~7.1% ~~attributable~~compared to ~~changes~~the same period in ~~our~~2004. ~~route~~The ~~destination~~increase ~~mix~~was ~~and~~driven toby anabnormally ~~overall~~low ~~decline~~volume with Bell Canada in ~~rates~~the comparative period of ~~experienced~~2004. The number of customers in the ~~telecommunication~~current ~~industry~~quarter-end represents an increase of 228 compared to September 30, 2004, which were obtained through new service offerings in voice transport line of business.

InRevenues ~~the~~per ~~second quarter~~Line of ~~2005,~~Business voice transport revenue includes the impact of major favorable settlement agreements with certain carriers for approximately $1.5 million. In addition, the second quarter of 2005 voice transport revenue includes an amount of $1.2 million resulting from a non-recurring favorable settlement of a dispute with a customer.

~~Data~~Voice ~~service~~Transport ~~revenue~~Revenues in the second quarter of 2005 was lower by approximately $1.2 million or 4.6% as compared to the second quarter of 2004. Data service revenue decreased by $3.4 million or 6.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same prior year period of 2004. The Company experienced growth in new customers and in traffic volume in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, however, these benefits were offset by price erosion. In addition, Data service revenue includes the impact of a major favorable settlement agreement with a carrier for approximately $0.3 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.

Revenue generated from ~~value-added~~voice transport services ~~increased~~decreased by approximately $234.46 million or 10 15.93% in the current quarter as compared to the same ~~quarter~~prior ofyear ~~2004~~period. The decrease is primarily explained by price erosion and route destination mix. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, revenue generated from voice transport increased by $513.01 million or 112.93% ~~for~~compared to the same prior year~~-to-date~~ period. ~~ended~~The increase is explained by the inclusion of ITXC revenue from June 1, 2004 and from an increase in minutes of traffic carried in both comparable periods. Minutes of traffic carried in the current quarter versus the same quarter in 2004 increased by 5.2% and increased by 30.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The ~~company~~increase ~~experienced~~is ~~increases~~mainly indue ~~signaling~~to ~~services~~the inclusion ~~and~~of a ITXC related minutes from June 1, 2004 while excluding such volume ~~increase~~for inthe ~~our~~first ~~international~~five ~~toll~~months ~~free~~of ~~service~~2004. ~~(ITFS)~~The increase in ~~both~~revenue ~~periods~~was asoffset ~~compared~~by to the ~~same~~current ~~periods~~competitive pricing trends in ~~2004~~the telecommunication industry.

During the quarter and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the average voice revenue per minute was approximately $0.055 and $0.058 compared with $0.069 and $0.073 per minute during the quarter and the nine months ended September 30, 2004 respectively. The decrease in average revenue per minutes was primarily attributable to an overall decline in rates experienced in the telecommunication industry and to changes in our route destination mix.

The year-to-date voice transport revenue includes the impact of major favorable settlement agreements with certain carriers for approximately $1.5 million and also includes an amount of $1.2 million resulting from a non-recurring favorable settlement of a dispute with a customer.

Data Transport Revenues

Data transport revenues in the third quarter of 2005 was lower by approximately $1.1 million or 4.4% compared to the third quarter of 2004. Data transport revenues decreased by $4.6 million or 5.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same prior year period of 2004. The Company experienced growth in new customers and in traffic volume in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, however, these benefits were offset by price erosion. In addition, data transport revenues includes the impact of a major favorable settlement agreement with a carrier for approximately $0.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

Value-added Service Revenues

Revenue generated from value-added services increased by $2.7 million or 10.8% in the current quarter compared to the same quarter of 2004 and by $7.7 million or 11.5% for the year-to-date period ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The company experienced increases in signaling services and a volume increase in our international toll free service (ITFS) in both periods compared to the same periods in 2004.

Operating Expenses

The following table outlines operating costs as a percentage of revenue for the periods indicated. The results of ITXC are included from June 1, 2004.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005		Three Months Ended June 30, 2004		Six Months Ended June 30, 2005		Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
	Three Months Ended September 30,2005		Three Months Ended September 30,2004		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Total operating revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Total telecommunication revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Operating expenses
Telecommunication	7072.9	%	7375.43	%	72.67	%	7273.7	%
Network, exclusive of depreciation and amortization (shown below)	9.5	%	10.4	%	9.2	%	10.7	%
Network, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below	9.1	%	8.4	%	9.2	%	9.9	%
Selling, general and administrative exclusive of, bad debt expense (recovery), stock based compensation expense, depreciation, amortization and restructuring charges (shown below)	15.7	%	14.0	%	15.2	%	13.0	%
Selling, general and administrative, exclusive of stock based compensation expense, bad debt expense, depreciation, amortization and restructuring charges shown below	16.4	%	14.4	%	15.6	%	13.5	%
Stock based compensation expense	0.0	%	0.0	%	0.0	%	0.0	%
Bad debt expense (recovery)	0.9	%	0.2	%	(0.1	)%	(0.1	)%
Bad debt expense	0.5	%	0.2	%	0.1	%	0.0	%
Depreciation	2.43	%	2.29	%	2.4	%	2.15	%
Amortization of intangible assets	1.12	%	0.97	%	1.01	%	0.76	%
Restructuring charges	—	%	—	%	—	%	0.21	%
Foreign exchange loss (gain)	0.73	%	(0.1	)%	0.75	%	0.10	%
Total operating expenses as a percentage of revenues	~~101~~102.27	%	101.08	%	101.06	%	99100.43	%

Telecommunication expense

Telecommunication expense during the three ~~and six~~ months ~~ended~~ ~~June~~ ended September 30, 2005 ~~increased~~decreased by approximately $030.27 million or 014.17% ~~and~~compared to the same prior year period. This decrease is mostly due to lower voice termination cost. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, telecommunication expense increased by $354.58 million or 110.9% ~~respectively as~~ compared to the same ~~periods~~period in 2004. This increase is primarily explained by the inclusion of ITXC’s results from June 1, 2004., ~~The~~which ~~increase~~ was ~~partially~~mostly offset by lower voice termination costs reflecting benefits from price deflation. In addition, the ~~second~~three ~~quarter~~and ofnine months ended September 30, 2005 includes favorable impact due to the revision of estimates on disputed accounts payables and accrued liabilities for approximately $1.8 million and the benefit associated with negotiated retroactive rate adjustments totaling $1.6 million on certain contracts. The year-to-date ~~results~~expenses also include favorable settlements with certain carriers for approximately $~~2.7 million and $~~5.7 million ~~respectively~~. As a percentage of revenue, telecommunication expense decreased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 as compared to prior year periods mainly due to a favorable mix of voice transport destinations with lower average margin per minute and the unification of networks with ITXC.

Network expense

~~Network~~Ongoing ~~expense~~contract ~~decreased~~renegotiations bywith our suppliers and cancellations of unprofitable circuits continue to reduce our network expense by approximately $1.32 million or 5.60% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005 compared to the ~~second~~same quarter of 2004. ~~For~~and ~~the six months ended June 30, 2005, network expense decreased~~ by approximately $2.3.5 million or 4.89% ~~from~~for the ~~comparable~~nine ~~period~~months ~~in 2004. The decrease is~~ended ~~mainly~~September 30, ~~due~~2005 tofrom the ~~ongoing~~comparable ~~contract~~period ~~renegotiations~~in ~~with~~2004. ~~our~~Furthermore, ~~suppliers~~for ~~and~~the ~~cancellations~~year-to-date ofperiod, ~~unprofitable~~the ~~circuits~~decrease ~~and~~was impacted by ~~the impact of~~ a major favorable settlement agreement with a carrier for approximately $0.9 million. ~~The~~and ~~decrease was~~ partially offset by the inclusion of ITXC’s network expenses from June 1, 2004.

~~Network~~Selling, General ~~expense as a percentage of revenue decreased in the current quarter~~ and inAdministrative ~~the~~(SG&A) ~~year-to-date period as compared to prior year periods. The percentage decrease is a function of the decrease in network~~ expenses ~~while~~ ~~revenues increased for the same comparative periods.~~

For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, SG&A expenses increased by $17.5 million or 17.9% compared to the same period in 2004. The increase is in part due to non-recurring special charges recorded in the

~~Selling~~ third quarter of 2005 incurred in connection with the Plan of Amalgamation of the Company with VSNL announced on July 25, ~~General~~2005. These non-recurring special charges amounting to $7.9 million include $5.6 million in professional fees, $1.6 million in retention bonuses and ~~Administrative~~other compensation costs for Teleglobe employees (see Note 9 in the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statement included herein for more details) and $0.7 million of other. SG&A expense was also adversely affected by the decline in value of the US dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar from the 2004 period compared to the 2005 period, resulting in an increase in our SG&A expenses and by the inclusion of ITXC’s SG&A expenses from June 1, 2004. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 2005 include $1.3 million of ITXC integration costs and also include professional fees incurred in connection with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act investigation in the amount of $0.7 million.

~~Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense has increased by approximately $5.2 million or 16.0% in the second quarter of 2005 compared to the same quarter of 2004.~~ For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, SG&A expenses ~~increased~~totaled by $1739.59 million ~~or 30.2%~~ compared to ~~the~~$40.0 ~~same~~million ~~period~~ in ~~2004. The increases are mainly due to~~ the ~~inclusion~~third ofquarter ~~ITXC’s SG&A expense from June 1, 2004. Furthermore, SG&A expense was adversely affected by the decline in value~~ of ~~the US dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar from the~~ 2004 ~~periods compared to the 2005 periods, resulting in an increase in our SG&A expenses~~. The synergies ~~three~~ and ~~six~~the ~~months~~decrease ~~ended June 30, 2005 includes $1.1 million of professional fees incurred~~ in ~~connection~~cost ~~with~~base following the ~~Amalgamation~~completion ~~Agreement~~ of the ~~Company~~integration ~~with VSNL. In addition, the six months ended June 30, 2005 include $1.3 million~~ of ITXC ~~integration~~were ~~costs~~offset ~~and~~by ~~also~~the ~~include~~non-recurring ~~professional~~special ~~fees~~charges incurred in connection with the ~~Foreign~~Plan ~~Corrupt Practices Act investigation in the amount~~ of ~~$0.7~~Amalgamation ~~million.~~with ~~The~~VSNL ~~integration~~as ofmentioned ~~ITXC is completed and is expected to provide significant synergies resulting in a decreased cost base~~above. ~~See update on ITXC integration in “ITXC Integration Plan” included herein.~~

~~Bad~~The ~~debt~~retention ~~recovery~~bonuses for ITXC employees included in SG&A expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 were paid upon their departure and were amortized over such employees agreed-upon service period. See Note 9 to the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for more details.

Bad debt ~~recovery~~expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 amounted to $0.6 million versus a similar amount for the corresponding period of 2004. During the first six months of 2004, the Company’s collection efforts resulted in the collection of accounts, which were previously identified as doubtful accounts. Since then, the Company has gained insight in the collectibility of accounts and implemented more stringent credit review practices. The recovery in the first six months of 2005 reflects the revision of certain estimates resulting in a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $0.8 million. This amount, which is not related to the collection of previously identified doubtful accounts, increased operating income in the six months ended June 30, 2005.

Bad debt expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2005, increased by $0.6 million to $1.2 million compared to $0.6 million for the corresponding period of 2004. This increase reflects additional allowance recorded in the current quarter for certain specific customers. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005, bad debt expense totaled $0.6 million and includes the recovery recognized in the first quarter of 2005 following the revision of certain estimates and resulting in a reduction in the allowance for doubtful account of approximately $0.8 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, bad debt expense amounted to $30,000 and reflected the Company’s collection efforts resulting in the collection of accounts, which were previously identified as doubtful accounts. Since then, the Company has gained insight in the collectibility of accounts and implemented more stringent credit review practices.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense ~~increased~~decreased by $01.75 million or 1221.82% in the current quarter versus the comparable quarter in 2004. ~~mainly~~Depreciation ~~due~~for tocertain ~~the~~fiber capacities ~~inclusion~~have ~~of ITXC’s~~ceased ~~depreciation~~as ~~from~~they ~~June~~have 1,been ~~2004.~~fully ~~Similarly,~~depreciated ~~for~~in January 2005. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, depreciation expense increased by $21.83 million or 307.08% compared to the same period in 2004. This is attributed to the inclusion of ITXC’s depreciation from June 1, 2004.

Amortization of intangible assets

Amortization of intangible assets expense in the current quarter ~~increased~~remained byin ~~$0.7~~line ~~million~~with ~~or approximately by 35.1% from~~ the same quarter in 2004. ~~For~~ However, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, amortization expense increased by $1.78 million or 5128.75% as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2004. The increase is mostly due to intangible assets recorded in connection with the ~~merger with~~ ITXC merger.

Restructuring charges

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2004, the Company reduced its workforce by 15 people and as consequence, incurred restructuring costs in the amount of $893,000. See Note 1213 to the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for more details.

The retention bonuses that are being paid to ITXC employees upon their departure are being amortized over such employees agreed-upon service period and are included in SG&A expenses. See Note 8 to the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for more details.

Foreign exchange loss

The foreign exchange loss of $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a foreign exchange gain of $0.2 million and a foreign exchange loss of $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 respectively are explained by the effect of

~~fluctuations~~Foreign inexchange ~~the~~loss Euro, Canadian dollar, British Pound and other currencies versus US Dollar on certain assets and liabilities of the Company. The Company’s reporting currency is the US dollar, however, the Company transacts business in several different currencies.

~~Other~~The ~~expenses~~foreign exchange loss of $77,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to a foreign exchange gain of $0.2 million and a foreign exchange loss of $73,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 respectively are explained by the effect of fluctuations in the Euro, British Pound, Canadian dollar and other currencies versus US Dollar on certain net monetary assets of the Company. The Company’s reporting currency is the US dollar, however, the Company transacts business in several different currencies.

Interest expense

Interest expense, net of interest income, for the current quarter of 2005 decreased by $13.79 million or by 4562.02% as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2004 and for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, interest expense, net of interest income, decreased by $04.21 million or by 32.7% from the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2004. The ~~decrease~~decreases isare mainly due to ~~a reduction of~~ the accretion related to the Comfone AG liability that was recorded in 2004. ~~During~~At the ~~three~~end ~~months~~of ~~ended~~the ~~June~~first ~~30,~~quarter of 2005, the Company had completely accreted for the Comfone AG liability and a recovery of interest expense of $0.5 million was recorded to reflect the final negotiated agreement with Comfone AG reached during the second quarter of 2005.

Other income

The increase in other income of $2.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 is primarily due to the net gain on disposal of the land, building and office equipment located in the Burnaby Vancouver. See Note 12 to the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for more details.

Income taxes

Income tax ~~recovery~~expense infor the three ~~and~~-month ~~six~~period ~~months~~ ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 ~~amounted~~totaled to $~~0.3~~133,000 ~~million~~ and ~~$0.6~~mainly ~~million~~consisted ~~respectively~~of ~~and~~current ~~consists~~income oftax ~~$0.2~~resulting ~~million~~from ~~and~~the ~~$0.3~~filing ~~million~~ of ~~current~~the 2004 US income tax ~~expense,~~return. ~~due~~The toincome UStax ~~state~~recovery ~~taxes~~for ~~and~~the ~~current~~nine-month ~~income~~period ~~tax~~ended September 30, ~~for~~2005 aof ~~few~~$453,000 ~~foreign~~resulted ~~entities,~~from ~~offset~~a by deferred ~~income~~ tax ~~recoveries~~recovery of $~~0.5~~887,000 ~~million~~mostly ~~and $0.9 million~~ due ~~mostly~~ to a reduction in deferred tax liabilities caused by unrealized foreign exchange losses incurred by a Luxembourg entity ~~for~~and ~~the~~offset ~~three~~by ~~and~~current ~~six~~tax expense ~~months~~of ~~ended~~$434,000 ~~June~~due ~~30,~~to ~~2005 respectively~~taxes payable in the US and in some foreign entities.

Income tax recovery for the ~~six~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2004 of $2.24 million ~~consisted~~included ofa current ~~income~~tax ~~taxes~~recovery of $12.81 million due mostly to a recorded ~~taxes~~tax receivable related to the carry back of losses, and ~~plus~~a $0.43 million of deferred tax recoveries.

Liquidity and capital resources

Cash flow from operations

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, the Company’s cash flow ~~flows~~generated ~~from operating~~$22.8 ~~activities~~million ~~amounted~~from tooperating $2activities.0 ~~million~~It ~~made-up~~is composed of a net loss of $816.87 million, reduced by adjustments of $1424.4 million for non-cash items and ~~increased~~ by $315.61 million related to changes in operating assets and liabilities. The majority of the non-cash items relate to depreciation and amortization and to the net gain on ~~sale~~disposal of property and equipment. The changes in operating assets and liabilities ~~stem~~ mostly stem from ~~prepaids,~~a ~~other~~reduction ~~current~~in ~~assets~~accounts receivable and an increase in prepaid assets. In certain cases, the collection of accounts ~~payable~~receivables ~~and~~can ~~accrued liabilities~~be facilitated by the Company’s ability to offset with accounts payables of the corresponding carrier.

Investing Activities

Cash flows used in investing activities of $916.3 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 are mostly a result of capital expenditures and ~~an increase in investments. These are partially offset by the proceeds received in the disposal of property and equipment and by changes in restricted cash. The purchase of property~~ ~~and~~acquisition ~~equipment in the amount~~ of ~~$9.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, consists mostly of information technology upgrades and network equipment. The addition of~~ intangible assets ~~of $4~~.7 ~~million~~These relates to software purchases. The $1.6 million increase in investments is for the purchase of shares in Wmode Inc. as discussed in Note 4 of the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Together with its equity investment in Wmode Inc., the Company will have exclusive distribution rights to Wmode Inc’s proprietary technology, assuming revenue targets are ~~attained.~~partially ~~This~~offset ~~will contribute to the Company’s plan to increase value-added service revenues. Cash flows for investing activities were provided~~ by the ~~decrease in a commercial letter of credit affecting restricted cash and the sale of marketable securities.~~

Financing Activities

The cash flows used in financing activities of $1.7 million relates mostly to the repayment of capital lease obligations.

proceeds received in the disposal of property and equipment and by changes in restricted cash. The purchase of property and equipment in the amount of $14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, consists mostly of information technology upgrades and network equipment. The addition to intangible assets of $8.5 millions relates to software as well as distribution rights from Wmode Inc. as described in Note 4 of the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Financing Activities

The cash flows used in financing activities of $2.4 million relates mostly to the repayment of capital lease obligations.

Liquidity

We believe that our current liquidity and anticipated future cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations in the next twelve months and to fund the first principal repayment of $25 million, under our senior notes, due in ~~the~~May ~~second quarter of~~ 2006. Our expenditures for the remaining quarters in 2005 will be primarily attributable to operating expenses, capital expenditures and interest payments. We cannot be certain, however, that additional cash will not be required, particularly if we make significant capital expenditures or other investments.

Our working capital at ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 is in a negative position of $6065.~~3 million~~9 millions versus a negative position of $26.9 million at December 31, 2004. ~~The~~This change in working capital is mostly ~~due~~explained toby the inclusion in current liabilities of the first principal repayment of $25 million, under our senior notes, which is due ~~within~~ ~~one~~in ~~year~~May 2006 and by anuse ~~increase~~of incash and ~~accounts~~accrued ~~payables~~liabilities for investments, additions to property and ~~accrued~~equipment ~~liabilities~~and ~~mostly~~intangible ~~due~~assets. Furthermore, non-recurring special charges related to ~~timing~~the Plan of ~~PTT~~Amalgamation ~~settlements~~with VSNL contributed to the decline of our working capital. The settlement process in bilateral operating agreements has permitted the Company to operate successfully with negative working capital. We cannot be certain that these conditions will not change in future periods.

The following summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

Payments due	~~OperatingLeaseObligations~~Operating Lease Obligations		~~PurchaseObligations~~Purchase Obligations		Capital ~~LeaseObligations~~Lease Obligations		Senior ~~NoteObligations~~Note Obligations		~~OtherLong~~Other Long-~~termObligations~~term Obligations		Investment ~~inWmode~~in Wmode Inc.		Total
Remainder of 2005	$	125,~~332~~401	$	43,~~710~~869	$	~~1,419~~923	$	—	$	~~114~~64	$	~~1,654~~862	$	2011,~~229~~119
2006		1418,~~947~~442		31,~~001~~935		2,~~283~~610		25,000		~~217~~223		—		4548,~~448~~210
2007		1314,~~133~~731		58203		~~760~~949		25,000		~~214~~220		—		3941,~~165~~103
2008		12,~~518~~739		—152		~~146~~210		50,000		~~211~~216		—		6263,~~875~~317
2009		12,~~327~~405		—		—		—		~~218~~223		—		12,~~545~~628
Thereafter		69,~~099~~769		—		—		—		2,~~282~~474		—		7172,~~381~~243
Total	$	~~134~~133,~~356~~487	$	76,~~769~~159	$	4,~~608~~692	$	100,000	$	3,~~256~~420	$	~~1,654~~862	$	~~251~~248,~~643~~620

Other Commercial Commitments	Total ~~AmountsCommitted~~Amounts Committed		Less ~~than1~~than 1 Year
Standby letters of credit	$	2,~~139~~153	$	2,~~139~~153
Total commercial commitments	$	2,~~139~~153	$	2,~~139~~153

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The SEC announced on ~~March 2~~ September 21, 2005, a ~~one-year~~ further extension for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), for Non-Accelerated Filers and Foreign Private Issuers. ~~The~~that ~~compliance~~are ~~dates~~non-accelerated ~~have~~filers ~~been extended~~ from the ~~first fiscal year ending on or~~ ~~after~~announcement ~~July~~made ~~15, 2005 to the first fiscal year ending~~ on ~~or after July 15, 2006. Management has assessed that the Company satisfies the conditions to be a Non-Accelerated Filer, as defined in Rule 12b-~~March 2 ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~, ~~and is therefore eligible for the Section 404 extension~~2005. ~~Teleglobe~~The ~~must~~compliance ~~therefore~~dates behave ~~compliant~~been toextended ~~Section 404 beginning in its fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.~~

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The Company and its subsidiaries operate internationally and therefore our major market risk exposure is related to foreign currency fluctuations. Due to low levels of floating rate debt, we do not have material market risk exposures related to changes in interest rates. However, the Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its senior notes in that it is fixed and accordingly the fair value of the debt may fluctuate if the interest rate is not commensurate with market rates. To mitigate foreign currency risks, we may use derivative financial instruments such as forward foreign exchange contracts, foreign currency swap contracts and foreign currency denominated options. The derivative financial instruments are subject to standard credit terms and conditions, financial control management and risk monitoring procedures. However, no such instruments were entered into during the six months ended June 30, 2005.

from the first fiscal year ending on or after July 15, 2006 to the first fiscal year ending on or after July 15, 2007 (instead of from the first fiscal year ending on or after July 15, 2005 to the first fiscal year ending on or after July 15, 2006). Management has assessed that the Company satisfies the conditions to be a Non-Accelerated Filer, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is therefore eligible for the Section 404 extension. Teleglobe must therefore be compliant to Section 404 beginning in its fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, assuming the Company continues to meet the requirements of a Non-Accelerated Filer.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately and on a timely basis. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The legal proceedings and claims described under the heading captioned “Contingencies” in Note 1617 of the Notes to the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report are hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On ~~June 2~~October 25, 2005, the Company held its ~~Annual~~Special General Meeting of Shareholders in ~~New York~~Hamilton, ~~New York~~Bermuda. InThe ~~addition to the election of three directors to serve three-year terms, the~~ shareholders approved the ~~appointment~~Agreement and Plan of ~~PricewaterhouseCoopers~~Amalgamation ~~LLP~~among asVidesh ~~the~~Sanchar ~~Company’s~~Nigam ~~independent~~Limited, ~~auditors~~VSNL Telecommunications ~~for~~(Bermuda) ~~2005~~Ltd., and ~~authorized~~Teleglobe ~~the~~entered ~~Audit~~into ~~Committee~~on ofJuly 25, ~~the Board of Directors to set the auditors’ remuneration~~2005.

The following votes were cast for ~~each of~~ the ~~following nominees~~proposal ~~for~~to ~~director~~approve orthe ~~were~~Agreement ~~withheld~~and ~~with~~Plan ~~respect~~of ~~to such nominees~~Amalgamation:

Name	For	Withheld
For	30,569,108
Thomas S. Rogers	33,880,144	210,797
Against	246,932
Anthony J. Cassara	33,829,718	261,223
Abstain	8,759
Timothy F. Price	33,829,769	261,172

The following votes were cast for the proposal to approve the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2005 and authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditors’ remuneration:

For		34,054,739
Against		31,466
Abstain		4,736

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:

10.1		Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of July 25, 2005, by and among Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd. and Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 25, 2005).	Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of July 25, 2005, by and among Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd. and Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Annex A of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 26, 2005).
31.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
10.2	*		Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2005 by and between Teleglobe Canada ULC and Pierre Duhamel.
31.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
10.3	*		Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2005 by and between Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd and Pierre Duhamel.
32.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.1	*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Filed Herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TELEGLOBE ~~INTERNATIONALHOLDINGS~~INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD By: /s/ PIERRE DUHAMEL Pierre Duhamel Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President (principal financial officer and duly authorized officer)

Dated: ~~August~~November 109, 2005

EXHIBIT INDEX

10.1		Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of July 25, 2005, by and among Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd. and Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 25, 2005).	Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of July 25, 2005, by and among Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd. and Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Annex A of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 26, 2005).
31.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
10.2	*		Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2005 by and between Teleglobe Canada ULC and Pierre Duhamel.
31.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
10.3	*		Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2005 by and between Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd and Pierre Duhamel.
32.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.1	*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Filed Herewith

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · TELEGLOBE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD