
OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number:		3235-0063
Expires:		November 30, 2006
Estimated average burden hours
per response		1,196.00

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file numbers 333-50305 and 333-50305-01

Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		13-3983598
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

Eagle Family Foods, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		13-3982757
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)
735 Taylor Road, Suite 200 Gahanna, OH		43230
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		13-3983598
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

735 Taylor Road, Suite 200 Gahanna, OH		43230
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrants’ telephone number, including area code: (614) 501-4200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
N/A		N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Title of class ~~N/A~~

~~Indicate~~N/A by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants’ knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are accelerated filers (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ~~Yes ¨ No x~~

Yes ¨ No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants’ most recent completed second fiscal year. None.

As of ~~September~~October 221, ~~2003~~2004, there were 1957,~~002,282~~235 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. (“Common Stock”) and 10,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of Eagle Family Foods, Inc. outstanding, respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page	~~Page~~
PART I
Item 1.	~~Item 1.~~Business	~~Business~~2	2
Item 2.	~~Item 2.~~Properties	~~Properties~~10	9
Item 3.	~~Item~~Legal 3.Proceedings	~~Legal Proceedings~~10	9
Item 4.	~~Item~~Submission 4.of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~10	9
PART II
Item 5.	~~Item~~Market 5.for Registrants’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	~~Market for Registrants’ Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters~~11	10
Item 6.	~~Item~~Selected 6.Financial Data	~~Selected Financial Data~~12	11
Item 7.	~~Item~~Management’s 7.Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~13	12
Item 7A.	~~Item~~Quantitative ~~7A.~~and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~22	21
Item 8.	~~Item~~Financial 8.Statements and Supplementary Data	~~Financial Statements and Supplementary Data~~23	22
Item 9.	~~Item~~Changes 9.in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	~~Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure~~23	22
Item 9A.	~~Item~~Controls ~~9A.~~and Procedures	~~Controls and Procedures~~23	22
PART III
Item 9B.	Other Information	24
	Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrants	24
PART III
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	26
Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrants	25
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	28
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	27
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	30
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	29
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	31
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	31
PART IV
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	32
	Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K	32
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	33

PART I

Eagle Family Foods, Inc. (“Eagle”) and Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”, and together with Eagle, the “Company”) are presenting consolidated financial statements of the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the guidelines of Regulation S-X Article 3, Rule 3-10(c). Eagle is the issuer of a public registered debt that is guaranteed by its parent, Holdings. Eagle is 100% owned by Holdings; Holdings fully and unconditionally guarantees this registered debt; Holdings has no independent assets or operations; and Holdings has no other subsidiaries.

The Company has significant restrictions on the ability of Holdings or any guarantor to obtain funds from Eagle by dividend or loan as disclosed in Note 7 to the financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company has provided the disclosures prescribed by Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X with respect to the subsidiary issuers and subsidiary guarantors.

Item 1:

Business

~~Eagle Family Foods~~ Holdings, ~~Inc. (“Holdings”)~~ and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Eagle ~~Family Foods, Inc. (“Eagle”)~~ is a manufacturer and marketer of a portfolio of leading dry-grocery food products with widely recognized and established brands, including Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk and ~~Cremora~~None ~~powdered~~Such ~~non-dairy~~mincemeat ~~creamer~~pie filling. The Company began marketing premium dessert kits in the current fiscal year. These kits utilize the Company’s Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk product in popular sweetened condensed milk recipes. Eagle and Holdings are collectively referred to as the “Company”, unless the context indicates otherwise. Eagle and Holdings were incorporated in Delaware in 1997.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements which include assumptions about future market conditions, operations and financial results. These statements are based on current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties. They are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company’s actual results, performance or achievements in the future could differ significantly from the results, performance or achievements discussed or implied in such forward-looking statements herein and in prior ~~Securities~~SEC ~~and Exchange Commission~~ filings by the Company. The Company assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements or to advise of changes in the assumption on which they were based.

Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the success of new product introductions and promotions, changes in the competitive environment of the Company’s products, general economic and business conditions, industry trends, raw material costs, dependence on the Company’s labor force, and changes in, or the failure or inability to comply with, government rules and regulations, including, without limitation, Food and Drug Administration and environmental rules and regulations. Statements concerning interest rates and other financial instrument fair values and their estimated contribution to the Company’s future results of operations are based upon market information as of a specific date. This market information is often a function of significant judgment and estimation. Further, market interest rates and commodity prices are subject to significant volatility.

Significant Events in Fiscal Year ~~2003~~2004

~~Effective~~On December 3024, ~~2002~~2003, the Company ~~closed~~sold ~~its~~to ~~powdered~~Dean ~~non-dairy~~Specialty ~~creamer~~Foods ~~manufacturing plant in Chester~~Group, ~~South~~LLC ~~Carolina~~ (“~~Non-Dairy~~Dean ~~Creamer Plant Closure~~Foods”). ~~Production~~the isCompany’s ~~now~~business ~~sourced~~of ~~from~~marketing, adistributing and ~~third~~selling ~~party~~powdered ~~manufacturer~~non-dairy ~~under~~creamer asold ~~long-term~~under ~~co-pack~~the ~~agreement~~Cremora ~~entered~~and ~~into~~Cremora onRoyale ~~October~~brand 1,names ~~2002.~~(“Non-Dairy ~~The~~Creamer ~~third~~Business”) ~~party~~and ~~manufacturer~~related ~~has~~assets, ~~significantly~~including ~~larger~~inventory ~~powdered non~~(“Non-~~dairy~~Dairy ~~creamer~~Creamer ~~plants~~Sale”). ~~than~~The ~~the~~purchase price was $12.2 million. The Company ~~had,~~recognized ~~and~~a ~~has~~loss ~~agreed~~of to$1.0 ~~produce~~million on the ~~Company’s~~sale, ~~powdered~~which ~~non-dairy~~included ~~creamer~~the ~~requirements~~book atvalues aof ~~lower~~$3.4 ~~cost~~million, ~~than~~$6.3 ~~the~~million, ~~Company’s~~$2.3 ~~cost~~million, ofand ~~production~~$0.2 ~~During~~million ~~the~~for ~~year~~trade ~~ended~~names, ~~June~~goodwill, 28inventory, ~~2003~~and ~~(“fiscal~~other ~~year~~prepaid ~~2003”)~~assets, ~~the~~respectively. The Company ~~sold~~incurred ~~the Chester,~~$1.0 ~~South~~million ~~Carolina~~of ~~property,~~expenses ~~plant~~related ~~and~~to ~~equipment (~~the ~~“South~~Non-Dairy ~~Carolina~~Creamer ~~Property”) for $0~~Sale.5 ~~million.~~

InOn ~~connection~~March ~~with~~23, ~~the Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure~~2004, the Company ~~recorded~~entered into a ~~charge~~Financing ofAgreement ~~$1.2 million in fiscal year 2003, and included~~ (the ~~expense within the classification of~~ “~~Gain~~Financing ~~(loss~~Agreement’) onby ~~sale~~and ofamong ~~product~~Eagle, ~~lines~~Holdings, ~~net~~as ofa ~~reorganization~~guarantor, ~~charges~~ and ~~other~~certain ~~charges”~~financial oninstitutions ~~the~~party ~~Consolidated~~thereto ~~Statements~~from oftime ~~Operations~~to ~~and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The closure charges included $1.3 million for~~time ~~termination pay and benefits for~~ (the ~~79 displaced employees~~“Lenders”), ~~$0.4~~Fortress ~~million~~Credit ~~for~~Opportunities ~~other~~I ~~plant~~LP ~~closure costs and contractual expenditures~~(“Fortress”), ~~offset~~as bycollateral ~~the~~agent ~~$0.5~~for ~~million gain on~~ the ~~sale of the South Carolina Property. As of June 28~~Lenders, ~~2003, the remaining cash requirements of the Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure are expected to total $0.3 million~~ and ~~are~~Congress ~~expected to be paid by December 2003.~~

Products and Markets

The Company markets and distributes its products through the retail grocery channel, including mass-merchant retailers and club stores, foodservice, the U.S. military, and private label businesses. The Company’s U.S. food business is complemented by a presence in Canada and other foreign countries that represented 7.5%, 7.8% and 7.8% of the Company’s total net sales for fiscal year 2003, and its fifty-two week periods ended June 29, 2002 (“fiscal year 2002”) and June 30, 2001 (“fiscal year 2001”), respectively. The Company utilizes a national retail

~~grocery~~Financial ~~brokerage~~Corporation ~~company~~(Central) ~~with~~(“Congress”), 47an ~~brokerage~~administrative ~~houses~~agent ~~and~~for 13the ~~independent~~Lenders. ~~food~~The ~~brokers~~Financing toAgreement ~~sell~~provides ~~its~~for ~~products~~a secured revolving credit facility that consists of (1) an asset-based revolving credit facility (“Revolver A”) in ~~the~~an Uaggregate principal amount not to exceed $27.S.0 ~~Non-grocery~~million ~~channels~~at ~~and~~any ~~international~~time outstanding, including a subfacility for the issuance of letters of ~~markets~~credit ~~are~~in ~~serviced~~an ~~through~~aggregate ~~brokers,~~amount ~~distributors~~not to exceed $5.0 million, orand ~~directly~~(2) a revolving credit facility (“Revolver B”, ~~depending~~and ontogether with Revolver A, the ~~size~~“Revolving ~~and~~Financing ~~needs~~Facility”) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $55.0 million for Revolver B. The maturity date of the ~~customers~~Financing Agreement is March 23, 2007, subject to extensions if certain conditions are met.

The ~~Company’s~~proceeds ~~marketing~~from ~~programs~~the ~~consist~~Revolving ofFinancing ~~various~~Facility ~~combinations~~were ~~of media advertising~~used, ~~consumer~~in ~~promotions~~part, ~~and~~to ~~trade~~repay ~~promotion.~~all ~~Certain~~amounts ~~products~~outstanding ~~are also~~under ~~promoted~~the ~~with direct consumer rebate programs. The~~ Company’s ~~customers~~previous ~~may~~bank ~~also~~facilities and will be ~~offered~~used, ~~pre-season stocking and~~ in~~-store~~ ~~promotional~~part, ~~allowances.~~to ~~Since~~fund ~~many~~working capital of the Company’s ~~brands~~and ~~are purchased primarily as ingredients~~ for ~~recipes, the~~other ~~Company~~general ~~frequently~~corporate ~~promotes recipes that incorporate its brands~~purposes. Recipe dissemination is a primary focus during the holiday season for our seasonal brands, None Such mincemeat pie filling, Borden eggnog, and Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk. The following Company-sponsored Internet sites promote the recipes containing the Company’s products:

–The ~~www.eaglebrand.com;~~Company –has ~~www~~classified the Revolving Financing Facility as a current liability in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No.~~eaglenonesuch.com;~~ –95-22, ~~www~~“Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that Include Both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement” (“EITF 95-22”).~~bordeneggnog.com;~~ The Revolving Financing Facility is classified as a current liability in accordance with EITF 95-22 since the Financing Agreement contains a subjective acceleration clause and –a ~~www~~lock box arrangement that requires the cash receipts of the Company to be used to repay amounts outstanding under the Revolving Financing Facility.~~cremora.com.~~

~~The~~Subsequent ~~Company manufactured~~Event and marketed ReaLemon lemon juice from concentrate and ReaLime lime juice from concentrate (collectively, the “ReaLemon business”) until the sale of the ReaLemon business to Mott’s Inc. in September 2001. The net sales percentages provided below exclude the results from the ReaLemon business product lines for the periods provided.

~~Sweetened~~On ~~condensed~~September ~~milk.~~20, ~~The~~2004, the Company ~~manufactures~~entered ~~and~~into ~~markets~~a ~~Eagle~~First ~~Brand~~Amendment ~~and~~to ~~additional~~Financing ~~sweetened~~Agreement ~~condensed milk products in~~ (the ~~U.S.~~“First ~~In Canada,~~Amendment”) ~~the~~by ~~Company markets Eagle Brand~~ and ~~additional~~among ~~sweetened~~Holdings, ~~condensed~~as ~~milk~~guarantor, ~~products. In addition to classic~~ Eagle, ~~Brand~~as ~~sweetened condensed milk~~borrower, ~~the~~certain ~~Company’s~~financial ~~other~~institutions ~~branded~~from ~~sweetened~~time ~~condensed~~to ~~milk products include Eagle~~time ~~Brand~~party ~~low~~thereto, ~~fat~~Fortress, ~~and~~as ~~fat~~collateral ~~free~~agent ~~products,~~for ~~Meadow~~the ~~Gold~~Lenders, and ~~Star~~Congress, ~~and~~as ~~Magnolia~~administrative ~~Hispanic~~agent ~~brands.~~for ~~The Company’s Eagle Brand products carry~~ the ~~Borden and Elsie trademarks~~Lenders. The ~~Company~~First ~~also~~Amendment ~~manufactures sweetened~~temporarily ~~condensed~~increases ~~milk~~the ~~under~~principal ~~several~~amount ~~labels~~available for aborrowing ~~customer~~under ~~who~~Revolver ~~distributes~~A ~~and~~from ~~markets these products to certain ethnic markets. In fiscal year 2003~~$27, ~~fiscal year 2002~~000,000 ~~and fiscal year 2001~~to $30, ~~respectively~~000,000 ~~the~~through ~~Company’s~~and ~~sweetened~~including ~~condensed~~November ~~milk products accounted for 74%~~3, ~~71% and 69% of the Company’s net sales~~2004.

~~Retail~~Products ~~channels, including grocery~~ and ~~mass-merchant retailers, are the primary outlet for the Company’s sweetened condensed milk products and accounted for approximately 80%, 81% and 80% of the Company’s~~ ~~sweetened~~Markets condensed milk net sales for fiscal year 2003, fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2001, respectively. The balance of the Company’s sweetened condensed milk net sales is made through other channels, including foodservice customers, industrial customers, and international markets.

~~Powdered non-dairy creamers.~~ The Company markets ~~powdered~~and ~~non-dairy~~distributes ~~creamer~~its ~~under~~products through the ~~Cremora~~retail ~~and~~grocery ~~Cremora~~channel, ~~Royale~~including ~~brand~~mass-merchant ~~names.~~retailers Inand ~~fiscal~~club ~~year~~stores, ~~2003~~foodservice, ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~U.S. ~~2002~~military, and ~~fiscal~~private ~~year~~label ~~2001,~~businesses. ~~the~~The Company’s ~~powdered~~U.S. ~~non-dairy~~food ~~creamer~~business is complemented by a presence in Canada and other foreign ~~products~~countries ~~accounted~~that ~~for~~represented 188.7%, 218.0% and 227.9% of the Company’s total net sales for the fifty-three week period ended July 3, 2004 (“fiscal year 2004”), and the fifty-two week periods ended June 28, 2003 (“fiscal year 2003”) and June 29, 2002 (“fiscal year 2002”), respectively. The Company utilizes a national retail grocery brokerage company with 43 brokerage houses and 13 independent food brokers to sell its products in the U.S. Non-grocery channels and international markets are serviced through brokers, distributors, or directly, depending on the size and needs of the customers.

~~Branded~~The ~~Cremora~~Company’s ~~and~~marketing ~~Cremora~~programs ~~Royale~~consist ~~are~~of ~~sold~~various ~~primarily~~combinations ~~through~~of ~~retail~~media ~~channels~~advertising, ~~and~~consumer ~~accounted for 67%~~promotions, ~~62%,~~ and ~~73%~~trade ofpromotion. ~~the~~Certain ~~Company’s~~products ~~fiscal~~are also ~~year~~promoted ~~2003,~~with ~~fiscal~~direct ~~year~~consumer ~~2002,~~rebate ~~and~~programs. ~~fiscal~~The ~~year~~Company’s ~~2001~~customers ~~powdered non-dairy~~may ~~creamer~~also ~~net~~be ~~sales,~~offered ~~respectively.~~pre-season ~~Private~~stocking ~~label~~and ~~net~~in-store ~~sales~~promotional ~~accounted~~allowances. ~~for~~Since ~~13%,~~many ~~16% and 10%~~ of the Company’s ~~powdered~~brands ~~non-dairy~~are ~~creamer~~purchased ~~net~~primarily ~~sales~~as ingredients for ~~fiscal year 2003~~recipes, the ~~fiscal~~Company ~~year~~frequently ~~2002~~promotes ~~and~~recipes ~~fiscal~~that ~~year~~incorporate ~~2001,~~its ~~respectively,~~brands. ~~with~~Recipe ~~the~~dissemination ~~balance primarily~~is ~~attributable~~a toprimary ~~international~~focus ~~and~~during ~~industrial~~the ~~customers~~holiday ~~(who~~season ~~use~~for ~~non-dairy~~our ~~creamer~~seasonal inbrands ~~producing~~None ~~other~~Such ~~food~~mincemeat ~~products).~~pie ~~As noted previously~~filling, ~~the~~Borden ~~Company’s powdered non-dairy creamer products~~eggnog, asand ofEagle ~~January 1, 2003, are supplied by a~~Brand ~~third~~sweetened ~~party~~condensed ~~manufacturer~~milk. ~~Due~~The tofollowing ~~this~~Company-sponsored ~~decision~~Internet tosites ~~outsource~~promote the ~~production~~recipes ofcontaining the ~~branded~~Company’s ~~powdered non-dairy creamer~~ products,: ~~the Company will no longer focus marketing efforts on the private label and industrial non-dairy creamer channels.~~

~~Niche~~• ~~brand products~~www. ~~The Company’s niche brand products include eggnog, mincemeat pie filling and instant coffee~~eaglebrand. com

~~Borden~~• ~~eggnog is manufactured by a third party through a seasonal purchase order agreement~~www. ~~Borden eggnog is the only shelf-stable eggnog available in the market and competes with refrigerated eggnog~~eaglenonesuch. ~~Borden eggnog is distributed through the retail grocery channel. Eggnog is generally consumed during the November and December holiday season as a beverage or mixed with liquor as a cocktail.~~ com

•

www.bordeneggnog.com

•

www.eaglebrandkits.com

The Company marketed powdered non-dairy creamer under the Cremora and Cremora Royale brand names until the sale of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business to Dean Foods in December 2003. The Company manufactured and marketed ReaLemon lemon juice from concentrate and ReaLime lime juice from concentrate (collectively, the “ReaLemon business”) until the sale of the ReaLemon business to Mott’s Inc. in September 2001.

The net sales percentages provided within Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K exclude the results from the Non-Dairy Creamer Business and the ReaLemon business product lines for the applicable periods provided.

Sweetened condensed milk. The Company manufactures and markets Eagle Brand and additional sweetened condensed milk products in the U.S. In Canada, the Company markets Eagle Brand and additional sweetened condensed milk products. In addition to classic Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk, the Company’s other branded sweetened condensed milk products include Eagle Brand low fat and fat free products, Meadow Gold, and the Hispanic brands, Star and Magnolia. The Company’s Eagle Brand products carry the Borden and Elsie trademarks. In fiscal year 2004, the Company launched a new product offering, premium dessert kits, to selected markets. These premium dessert kits utilize the Company’s Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk product in popular sweetened condensed milk recipes. The Company also manufactures sweetened condensed milk under several private labels, which includes an Asian customer who distributes and markets these products to certain ethnic markets. In fiscal year 2004, fiscal year 2003, and fiscal year 2002, respectively, the Company’s sweetened condensed milk products accounted for 91%, 90% and 89% of the Company’s net sales.

Retail channels, including grocery and mass-merchant retailers, are the primary outlet for the Company’s sweetened condensed milk products and accounted for approximately 79%, 80% and 81% of the Company’s sweetened condensed milk net sales for fiscal year 2004, fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2002, respectively. The balance of the Company’s sweetened condensed milk net sales is made through other channels, including foodservice customers, industrial customers, and international markets.

Niche brand products. The Company’s niche brand products include eggnog, mincemeat pie filling and instant coffee.

Borden eggnog is manufactured by a third party through a seasonal purchase order agreement. Borden eggnog is the only shelf-stable eggnog available in the market and competes with refrigerated eggnog. Borden eggnog is distributed through the retail grocery channel. Eggnog is generally consumed during the November and December holiday season as a beverage or mixed with liquor as a cocktail.

The Company manufactures and markets two flavors of None Such mincemeat pie filling: Regular and Brandy & Rum. None Such mincemeat is used in pies, cookies and pastries, and is consumed primarily during the November and December holiday season. None Such is distributed through the retail grocery channel.

Kava is marketed by the Company and manufactured by a third party independent manufacturer pursuant to a co-packing agreement. Kava is a unique instant coffee, differentiated as the only coffee that is “90% acid-neutralized.” Management believes that Kava’s customer loyalty is significantly higher than that of most other instant coffee brands, and is well positioned to remain high given the brand’s unique position as an acid-neutralized product.

Competition

The Company operates in highly competitive markets. Competition for retail sales to consumers and sales to the retailer in the retail grocery channel is based on several factors, including brand name recognition, quality, price and customer service. Many companies with numerous brands and product offerings compete for retailers’ shelf-space and sales. The Company competes with a significant number of competitors of varying sizes, including divisions or subsidiaries of larger companies. ~~The most significant branded competition encountered by the Company is Nestlé’s Coffee-mate, which competes with Cremora and~~ ~~Cremora Royale.~~ Furthermore, the Company is facing increased competition from private label brands and store brands. A number of these branded and private label competitors have broader product lines, as well as substantially greater financial and other resources available to them compared to the Company.

Industry Overview

The U.S. food industry has historically been relatively stable with growth driven primarily by modest population increases and new products. Over the last ten years, management believes the industry has experienced consolidation as competitors have shed non-core business lines and made strategic acquisitions to strengthen category positions, generate economies of scale in distribution, production and raw material sourcing and create leverage relative to the retail grocery trade through better service and broader market presence.

Grocery retailers have also utilized mergers and acquisitions to consolidate within their industry. Growth in the mass-merchant retailer channel has outpaced growth in the retail grocery channel, and mass- merchant retailers have consequently increased their share of food sales relative to the retail grocery and drug store channels. Furthermore, the convenience store channel has maintained a constant presence within the total grocery industry. Management believes that food companies have broadened their distribution channels to include greater focus on mass-merchant retailers and other alternative distribution channels. Management also believes that another growth opportunity in the U.S. for branded food companies is the foodservice channel, which supplies restaurants, hospitals, schools and other institutions.

Seasonality

The Company’s net sales, operating income and cash flows are affected by a seasonal bias toward the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year due to increased sales during the holiday season. Three of the Company’s five major brands (Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk, Borden eggnog and None Such mincemeat pie filling) are consumed primarily during the November and December holiday season. In recent years, approximately 48% of the Company’s net sales, excluding the ReaLemon and ReaLime brands’ net sales, have occurred in the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. Because of this seasonality, the Company’s working capital needs have historically increased throughout the year, normally peaking in the August/September period, which requires the Company to draw additional amounts on its Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) in that period.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The primary raw materials used in the Company’s operations include milk, sugar, vegetable oil, corn syrup, and packaging materials. The Company purchases many of its raw materials from numerous independent suppliers. Milk is purchased through one cooperative at each of its manufacturing plants. Cremora and Cremora Royale

Grocery retailers have also utilized mergers and acquisitions to consolidate within their industry. ~~powdered~~Growth ~~non~~in the mass-~~dairy~~merchant ~~creamer,~~retailer ~~Kava~~channel ~~instant~~has ~~coffee~~outpaced growth in the retail grocery channel, and ~~Borden~~mass-merchant ~~eggnog~~retailers ~~are~~have ~~obtained~~consequently inincreased ~~final~~their ~~product~~share ~~form~~of ~~from~~food ~~third~~sales ~~party~~relative ~~manufacturers~~to the retail grocery and drug store channels. Furthermore, ~~traditionally~~the ~~referred~~convenience store channel has maintained a constant presence within the total grocery industry. Management believes that food companies have broadened their distribution channels to asinclude cogreater focus on mass-~~packers~~merchant retailers and other alternative distribution channels. Management also believes that another growth opportunity in the U.S. for branded food companies is the foodservice channel, which supplies restaurants, hospitals, schools and other institutions.

Seasonality

The Company’s net sales, operating income and cash flows are affected by a seasonal bias toward the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year due to increased sales during the holiday season. Three of the Company’s four major brands (Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk, Borden eggnog and None Such mincemeat pie filling) are consumed primarily during the November and December holiday season. In recent years, approximately 49% of the Company’s net sales, excluding the net sales of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business and the ReaLemon Business, have occurred in the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. Because of this seasonality, the Company’s working capital needs have historically increased throughout the year, normally peaking in the August/September period, which will require the Company to draw additional amounts on its Revolving Financing Facility in that period.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The primary raw materials used in the Company’s operations include milk, sugar, and packaging materials. The Company purchases many of its raw materials from numerous independent suppliers. Milk is purchased through one cooperative at each of its manufacturing plants. Kava instant coffee, sweetened condensed milk marketed in Canada, evaporated canned milk, and Borden eggnog are obtained in final product form from third party manufacturers, traditionally referred to as co-packers. The ingredients in the premium dessert kits are procured by the Company and converted into a finished product by a co-packer.

Trademarks, Copyrights and Patents

The Company owns a number of trademarks, licenses and patents. The Company’s principal trademarks include Eagle Brand, ~~Cremora,~~ and None Such which the Company has registered in the United States and various foreign countries. The Company holds a perpetual, exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Borden and Elsie trademarks on certain products and their extensions. The Borden and Elsie trademarks are currently used on (1) the entire line of Eagle Brand products, including condensed or evaporated milk, and (2) shelf-stable eggnog~~, and (3) Cremora powdered non-dairy creamer~~. The Borden trademark is also currently used on Magnolia sweetened condensed milk. The Company also holds a perpetual, exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Borden trademark on None Such mincemeat, Magnolia condensed or evaporated milk, and Kava acid-neutralized coffee. In addition, as assignee from Borden Foods Corporation (“BFC”), the Company holds an exclusive and royalty-free license from Dean Foods Limited (f.k.a. Southern Foods Group, L.P.) to use the Meadow Gold trademark on sweetened condensed milk in the United States for a five year term, which is renewable automatically for subsequent five year terms and terminable at the option of the Company upon one year’s notice and, under certain limited circumstances, by the licensor. Such brand names are considered to be of fundamental importance to the business of the Company due to their brand identification and ability to maintain brand loyalty. ~~A third party owns the Cremora trademark in Africa and the Middle East.~~ The Company also owns various patents and copyrights associated with the business.

Employees

As of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004, the Company employed approximately ~~165~~163 people, including 109 93 hourly and 7254 salaried employees. The Wellsboro, Pennsylvania and Starkville, Mississippi plants are unionized plants. As of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004, union employees represented approximately 5655% of the Company’s total work force. At Starkville, the Teamsters Local 984 has a contract expiring on January 31, 2005 and at Wellsboro, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union-Local 174 has a contract expiring on February 5, 2005. Management believes that relations with the Company’s employees and unions are generally good.

Business History

On January 23, 1998 (the “Acquisition Closing”), Eagle acquired certain assets of ~~Borden Foods Corporation (“~~BFC”), BFC Investments, L.P. (“BFC Investments”) and certain of their affiliates for an aggregate purchase price of $376.8 million (the “Acquisition”). The assets acquired included, among other things: (1) four manufacturing facilities located in Wellsboro, Pennsylvania; Starkville, Mississippi; Waterloo, New York; and Chester, South Carolina; (2) all machinery and equipment located at these facilities; (3) the trademarks Eagle Brand; ReaLemon; ReaLime; Cremora; Kava; None Such and certain other trademarks in North America and in certain foreign territories; and (4) a non-compete and non-solicitation agreement from BFC and certain of its affiliates.

Financing for the Acquisition and related fees and expenses consisted of (1) $82.5 million of equity contribution from Holdings (which was financed by Holdings’ issuance of preferred and common stock in that amount to GE Investment Private Placement Partners II, a Limited Partnership (“GEI”) and Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P. (“Warburg” and together with GEI, the “Equity Sponsors”), and certain members of the Company’s management, (the “Management Investors”), who contributed approximately $1.7 million of such amount (the “Equity Contribution”); (2) the issuance of $115.0 million of 8.75% senior subordinated notes due 2008 (the “Notes”); and (3) senior secured credit facilities (the “Senior Credit Facilities”) in an aggregate principal amount of $245.0 million, consisting of a $175.0 million term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) and a $70.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”).

Since the Acquisition Closing, the Company nationally launched Cremora Royale powdered non-dairy creamer, the Star and Magnolia Hispanic brands of sweetened condensed milk and ReaLemonade lemonade liquid concentrate.

In September 1999, the Equity Sponsors contributed an aggregate of $10.0 million to Holdings in exchange for shares of a new series of Holdings preferred stock and Holdings common stock. This contribution was made to finance the marketing investment made by the Company in launching Cremora Royale and ReaLemonade during its fiscal year ended July 3, 1999.

5In September 2001, the Company completed the sale to Mott’s Inc. and Cadbury Beverages Delaware, Inc. of Eagle’s business of developing, manufacturing, marketing, distributing and selling shelf-stable juice sold under the ReaLemon and ReaLime brand names (the “ReaLemon product lines”) and related assets for $128.4 million (the “ReaLemon Sale”).

~~Table~~In July 2001, the Company began implementing a plan (the “Plan”) to reorganize the management and operations of ~~Contents~~the Company because of the then pending ReaLemon Sale, which reduced the sales and operating base of the Company. The Plan included (1) the resignation of John O’C. Nugent as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company; (2) the appointment of Craig A. Steinke as Chief Executive Officer and President in addition to serving as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company; (3) the resignations of other executive officers of the Company; and (4) the closure of the corporate office in Tarrytown, New York and the research and development office in Columbus, Ohio.

finance the marketing investment made by the Company in launching Cremora Royale and ReaLemonade during its fiscal year ended July 3, 1999.

In September 2001, Eagle and Holdings completed the sale to Mott’s Inc. and Cadbury Beverages Delaware, Inc. of Eagle’s business of developing, manufacturing, marketing, distributing and selling shelf-stable juice sold under the ReaLemon and ReaLime brand names (the “ReaLemon product lines”) and related assets for $128.4 million (the “ReaLemon Sale”).

In July 2001, the Company began implementing a plan (“the Plan”) to reorganize the management and operations of the Company as a result of the then pending ReaLemon Sale, which reduced the sales and operating base of the Company. The Plan included (1) the resignation of John O’C. Nugent as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company; (2) the appointment of Craig A. Steinke as Chief Executive Officer and President in addition to serving as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company; (3) the resignations of other executive officers of the Company; and (4) the closure of the corporate office in Tarrytown, New York and the research and development office in Columbus, Ohio.

As part of the Plan, the number of corporate and administrative employees of the Company was reduced by 64% during the two quarters ended December 29, 2001, with the majority of the reductions occurring in the quarter ended September 29, 2001. In addition, the Company’s overall administrative cost structure was reduced by renegotiation of annual service contracts with third party vendors, elimination of office leases and related costs and reductions in travel, entertainment and other administrative expenses.

Effective December 30, 2002, the Company closed the powdered non-dairy creamer manufacturing plant in Chester, South Carolina (“Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure”) and outsourced the production of powdered non-dairy creamer product to Dean Specialty Foods Group, LLC (“Dean Foods”). In connection with the Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure, the Company recorded a charge of $1.2 million in fiscal year 2003. The closure charges included $1.3 million for termination pay and benefits for the 79 displaced employees, $0.4 million for other plant closure costs and contractual expenditures, offset by the $0.5 million gain on the sale of the South Carolina Property.

On December 24, 2003, the Company completed the Non-Dairy Creamer Sale to Dean Foods for $12.2 million. The Company has reclassified the results of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business as discontinued operations.

Certain Legal and Regulatory Matters

Public Health. The Company is subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated thereunder by the Food and Drug Administration. This comprehensive regulatory program governs, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, labeling, packaging and safety of food. In addition, the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, as amended, prescribes the format and content of certain information required to appear on the labels of food products. The operations and the products of the Company are also subject to state and local regulation through such measures as: licensing of plants, enforcement by state health agencies of various state standards and inspection of facilities. Management believes that the Company’s facilities and practices are in compliance with applicable government regulations in all material respects. The Company is subject to certain health and safety regulations, including regulations issued pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act. These regulations require the Company to comply with certain manufacturing, health and safety standards to protect its employees from accidents. See “Risk Factors— The Company’s operations are subject to comprehensive public health regulations.”

Environment. The Company believes that it is substantially in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations for the protection of the environment. The Company’s operations and properties are subject to a wide variety of increasingly complex and stringent federal, state and local environmental regulations governing the storage, handling, generation, treatment, emission, and disposal of certain substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater. As such, the nature of the Company’s operations exposes it to the risk of claims with respect to environmental matters. Based upon its experience to date, the Company believes that the future cost of compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations and liability for known environmental claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Risk Factors— The Company’s operations and properties are subject to a wide variety of increasingly complex and stringent federal, state and local environmental regulations governing the storage, handling, generation, treatment, emission, and disposal of certain substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater.”

Risk Factors

In connection with a review of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully.

The Company has a significant amount of indebtedness. As of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~ 2004, the outstanding indebtedness was $~~193~~185.37 million, with maturities of $870.67 million, ~~$51.0~~in ~~million~~fiscal year 2007 on the Revolving Financing Facility and $18115.70 million in fiscal year 2008 on the ~~fiscal~~Notes. ~~years~~This ~~2004~~substantial ~~through~~indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:

6• make it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its obligations to creditors, including holders of its Notes, who could upon default require the Company to accelerate principal and interest payments;

~~Table~~• oflimit ~~Contents~~the Company’s ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, the sales growth, research and development costs, or other general corporate purposes;

2006 on the Senior Credit Facilities and $115 million in fiscal year 2008 on the Notes. This substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:

• make it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its obligations to creditors, including holders of its Notes, who could upon default require the Company to accelerate principal and interest payment;

• limit the Company’s ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, the Company’s growth, research and development costs or other general corporate purposes;

• require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness and corresponding interest, which will reduce the cash flow available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

•

limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and in the industry in which the Company operates;

• increase the vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions, and adverse changes in government regulation;

•

place the Company at a disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt; and

•

expose the Company to risks inherent in interest rate fluctuations because some of the indebtedness bears interest at variable rates, which could result in higher interest expense in the event of increases in interest rates.

Any of the above listed factors could have a material adverse affect on the Company’s business and results of operations and its ability to meet its obligations.

~~The~~7 credit agreement governing the Company’s Senior Credit Facilities restricts management’s discretion in operating the Company’s business. In addition, the credit agreement requires the Company to maintain specified financial ratios and tests, among other obligations. The credit agreement also restricts the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, make acquisitions and make capital expenditures.

The Financing Agreement governing the Revolving Financing Facility restricts management’s discretion in operating the Company’s business. The Financing Agreement requires the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness and corresponding interest, which will reduce the cash flow available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes. In addition, the Financing Agreement requires the Company to maintain specified financial ratios and tests, among other obligations. The Financing Agreement also restricts the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, make acquisitions and make capital expenditures.

The markets in which the Company competes are highly competitive. The Company competes with large and established national and multinational companies, as well as smaller companies. Some of these competitors have, and new competitors may have, substantially greater resources than the Company has. Consequently, it cannot be assured that the Company will be able to compete effectively in the future. See “Competition.”

The Company relies upon its suppliers and third party manufacturers. The Company purchases many of its raw materials from numerous independent suppliers. Milk is purchased through one cooperative at each of its manufacturing plants. ~~Cremora and Cremora Royale powdered non-dairy creamer,~~ Kava instant coffee, sweetened condensed milk marketed in Canada, evaporated canned milk, and Borden eggnog are obtained in final product form from third party manufacturers, or co-packers. The ingredients in the premium dessert kits are procured by the Company and converted into a finished product by a co-packer. Any adverse change in any of the following could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations:

•

relationships with the Company’s suppliers or third party manufacturers;

•

financial condition of the suppliers or third party manufacturers; or

•

the suppliers’ or third party manufacturers’ ability to manufacture and deliver outsourced products on a timely basis.

There is no assurance that the Company could quickly or effectively replace any of its suppliers or third party manufacturers if the need arose. The Company’s dependence on these suppliers and third party ~~manufactures~~manufacturers could also adversely affect its ability to react quickly and effectively to changes in the market for its products.

The Company uses milk as a major ingredient in its sweetened condensed milk product line and is subject to the risk of rising milk prices that increase manufacturing costs and erode profit margins. By purchasing future contracts, the Company tries to establish a known price for future milk purchases in order to protect against fluctuating milk prices. Milk prices in April 2004 rose dramatically and the forward milk prices from May through December have also increased significantly. Future contracts purchased by the Company reduced a significant portion of the negative impact these higher milk prices would have had on the Company’s operating results. However, if milk prices continue to rise and the Company is not able or does not secure lower priced milk future contracts, the impact of higher milk prices could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The Company manufactures all of its U. S. sweetened condensed milk at two facilities and is dependent on such facilities for production. The Company manufactures sweetened condensed milk for the U.S. markets at the Wellsboro, PA and Starkville, MS facilities. These facilities are subject to the normal hazards that could result in any material damage to any such facility. Damage to the facilities, or prolonged interruption in the operations of the facilities for repairs or other reasons, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company cannot be certain of the results of its product innovations and marketing programs. The Company believes that its future success will depend, in part, upon its ability to develop, manufacture and market new products or line extensions to its existing product lines. The Company is making an investment in the development, test marketing, and promotion of new premium dessert kits utilizing popular sweetened condensed milk recipes, which were introduced into the market in fiscal year 2004. The Company cannot predict whether it will be successful in the introduction, marketing and manufacturing of this new product offering or any other new products. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to develop and introduce new products or improvements to its existing products, which satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. The

new products or line extensions to its existing product lines. The Company cannot predict whether it will be successful in the introduction, marketing and manufacture of any new products. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to develop and introduce new products or improvements to its existing product, which satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. The failure to develop products and introduce them successfully in a timely manner could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is dependent on a concentrated customer base. The Company does not have long-term sales agreements or other contractual assurances as to future sales with any of its customers. In addition, continued consolidation in the retail industry has resulted in an increasingly concentrated retail base. ToIf ~~the extent~~ such concentration continues to occur, the Company’s net sales and operating income may be increasingly sensitive to deterioration in the financial condition of its customer base, or other adverse developments involving the Company’s ~~relationship~~relationships with its customers.

The Company’s operations are subject to comprehensive public health regulations. The Company is subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated thereunder by the Food and Drug Administration. This comprehensive regulatory program governs, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, labeling, packaging and safety of food. In addition, the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, as amended, prescribes the format and content of certain information required to appear on the labels of food products.

The operations and the products of the Company are also subject to state and local regulation through such measures as licensing of plants, enforcement by state health agencies of various state standards and inspection of facilities. Enforcement actions for violations of federal, state and local regulations may include seizure and condemnation of volatile products, cease and desist -orders, injunctions and/or monetary penalties.

The Company is subject to certain health and safety regulations, including regulations issued pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act. These regulations require the Company to comply with certain manufacturing, health and safety standards to protect its employees from accidents.

Management believes that the Company’s facilities and practices comply with applicable government regulations in all material respects, but there can be no assurance that the Company will not incur liabilities in the future. In addition, future events, such as changes in existing laws and regulations or their interpretation, and more vigorous enforcement policies of regulatory agencies, may give rise to additional expenditures or liabilities that could be material.

The Company’s operations and properties are subject to a wide variety of increasingly complex and stringent federal, state and local environmental regulations governing the storage, handling, generation, treatment, emission, and disposal of certain substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater. As such, the nature of the Company’s operations exposes it to the risk of claims with respect to environmental matters. The Company believes that it is substantially in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations for the protection of the environment. Based upon its experience to date, the Company believes that the future cost of compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations and liability for known environmental claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. In connection with the Acquisition, the Company assumed all past and future environmental liabilities related to the acquired business. The Company would have been indemnified by BFC and BFC Investments with respect to certain pre-Acquisition Closing environmental liabilities identified by January 2003. No liabilities were identified. There can be no assurances that past material environmental liabilities will not be identified or that new material environmental liabilities will not be incurred. In addition, future events, such as changes in existing laws and regulations or their interpretation, and more vigorous enforcement policies of regulatory agencies, may give rise to additional expenditures or liabilities that could be material.

Available Information.

The Company’s Internet address is www.eaglefamilyfoods.com. The Company does not make available its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on the Internet, but these reports will be furnished free of charge upon request to the Secretary of the Company at (614) 501-4200.

those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on the Internet, but these reports will be furnished free of charge upon request to the Secretary of the Company at (614) 501-4200.

Item 2:

Properties

The Company produces its U.S. sweetened condensed milk and mincemeat pie filling products in two Company-owned manufacturing facilities, as described in the following table. Management believes that the Company’s manufacturing plants have sufficient capacity to accommodate the Company’s needs for the foreseeable future.


Location	Square Feet	Products Manufactured
Wellsboro, PA	119,000	Sweetened condensed milk, mincemeat pie filling
Starkville, MS	49,000	Sweetened condensed milk

In addition to the owned manufacturing facilities described above, as of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004, the Company leased 2017,000 square feet of office space in Columbus, Ohio and uses public warehouse space in numerous locations in variable amounts as needed.

Item 3:

Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to litigation in the ordinary course of its business. The Company is not a party to any lawsuit or proceeding, which is material, or in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4:

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5: Market for Registrants’ Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

There is no established public trading market for the common stock of Holdings or Eagle. As of September 22, 2003, Holdings was the only holder of Eagle common stock. As of September 22, 2003, there were approximately 22 holders of Holdings’ common stock.

No cash dividends on common stock have been declared by either registrant since their respective incorporations. Holdings and Eagle are restricted from declaring dividends on their common stock by the Senior Credit Facilities. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Financial Statements of Holdings and Eagle included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Item~~PART 6:II ~~Selected Financial Data~~

~~The~~Item ~~selected~~5: ~~financial~~Market ~~data set forth below (dollars in thousands) as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, and~~ for ~~fiscal~~Registrants’ ~~year~~Common ~~2003~~Equity, ~~fiscal~~Related ~~year~~Stockholder ~~2002,~~Matters and ~~fiscal~~Issuer ~~year~~Purchases ~~2001 are derived from audited financial statements included elsewhere herein. The selected financial data set forth below as~~ of ~~July~~Equity 3, 1999, July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2001 and the fifty-two week period ended July 1, 2000 (“fiscal year 2000”), and the fifty-three week period ended July 3, 1999 (“fiscal year 1999”) are derived from the financial statements not included elsewhere herein. The results of operations were affected by certain reclassifications made to comply with the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 00-14 and No. 00-25, as described in “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These reclassifications had no impact on operating income, net loss or cash flows. Securities

	Fifty-Three WeekPeriod EndedJuly 3, 1999(a)			Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJuly 1, 2000(a)			Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 30, 2001(a)			Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 29, 2002(a)			Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 28, 2003(a)
Statement of Operations Data:(b)
Net sales	$	205,668		$	186,165		$	185,570		$	143,849		$	128,722
Cost of goods sold		111,026			111,140			102,650			101,273			81,313
Gross profit		94,642			75,025			82,920			42,576			47,409
Distribution expenses		12,947			13,098			12,851			9,004			8,292
Marketing expense		42,382			27,071			20,284			12,335			11,158
General & administrative expense		12,406			13,580			13,363			8,824			7,619
Amortization of intangible assets		21,249			11,156			11,157			8,052			1,660
Gain (loss) on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges and other charges		—			—			—			18,722	(c)		(1,190	)
Other operating income		—			(1,212	)		—			—			—
Operating income		5,658			11,332			25,265			23,083			17,490
Net loss	$	(14,485	)	$	(11,610	)	$	(5,434	)	$	(31,709	) (d)	$	(54,606	) (e)
Other Financial Data:
Depreciation and amortization(f)	$	26,497		$	20,553		$	19,756		$	28,427		$	6,772
Capital expenditures		13,744			7,564			3,568			414			610

There is no established public trading market for the common stock of Holdings or Eagle. As of October 1, 2004, Holdings was the only holder of Eagle common stock. As of October 1, 2004, there were three holders of Holdings’ Common Stock.

	As ofJuly 3, 1999(a)		As ofJuly 1, 2000(a)		As ofJune 30, 2001(a)		As ofJune 29, 2002(a)		As ofJune 28, 2003
Balance Sheet Data:
Inventories	$	41,757	$	33,780	$	36,929	$	35,491	$	32,594
Net property and equipment		33,798		33,775		31,014		8,670		5,574
Total assets		417,286		396,670		387,546		224,424		158,494
Total debt, including current maturities		338,500		327,500		333,500		203,788		193,252
Stockholder’s equity		41,795		39,972		34,563		2,709		(51,775	)

No cash dividends on common stock have been declared by either registrant since their respective incorporations. Holdings and Eagle are restricted from declaring dividends on their common stock by the Revolving Financing Facility. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Financial Statements of Holdings and Eagle included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~(a)~~ The ~~statements~~following oftable ~~operations~~presents ~~and~~ the ~~balance~~number ~~sheets set forth above reflect the financial position and results~~ of ~~operations~~shares of ~~Eagle.~~Common ~~With~~Stock that ~~the~~were ~~exception~~repurchased ofby ~~stockholder’s~~Holdings ~~equity,~~from ~~Series~~certain Acurrent ~~Non-Voting Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”)~~ and ~~the~~prior ~~Series~~employee B Non-Voting Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock,” together with Series A Preferred Stock, “Redeemable Preferred Stock”), this information is substantially consistent with that of Holdings. The following represents stockholders’ ~~deficit~~in ~~and~~fiscal ~~Redeemable~~year ~~Preferred Stock of Holdings~~2004:

	As ofJuly 3, 1999				As ofJuly 1, 2000				As ofJune 30, 2001			As ofJune 29, 2002			As ofJune 28, 2003
Period	(a) Total Numberof Shares (or Units)Purchased		(b) Average PricePaid for Share (orUnit)			(c) Total Numberof Shares (or Units)Purchased as Partof PubliclyAnnounced Plansor Programs		(d) MaximumNumber (orApproximateDollar Value) of Shares(or Units) that May Yet BePurchased Underthe Plans orPrograms
Stockholders’ deficit	$	(52,235	)		$	(74,314	)		$	(91,362	)	$	(135,802	)	$	(204,302	)
December 2003	45,047		$	0.00		—		—
Redeemable Preferred Stock		93,302				113,555				125,163			137,129			151,145
Total	45,047		$	0.00		—		—

(b) The adoption of EITF No. 00-14 and No. 00-25, effective first quarter of 2002, resulted in the following reclassifications to fiscal year 1999, fiscal year 2000 and fiscal year 2001: net sales were reduced by $34.1 million, $38.6 million and $35.1 million, respectively; distribution expense was reduced by $0.5 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively; and marketing expense was reduced by $33.6 million, $37.6 million and $34.1 million, respectively. These reclassifications had no impact on operating income, net loss and cash flows.

(d) In fiscal year 2002, the Company recorded a valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards of $33.2 million.

(e) In fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $56.6 million upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

(f) Includes the amortization of debt issuance cost of $920, $1,823, $2,322, $2,878, and $1,451 for fiscal year 1999, fiscal year 2000, fiscal year 2001, fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2003, respectively.

Item 76: ~~Management’s~~Selected ~~Discussion and Analysis of~~ Financial ~~Condition and Results of Operations~~ Data

~~General~~The selected financial data set forth below (dollars in thousands) as of July 3, 2004 and June 28, 2003, and for fiscal year 2004, fiscal year 2003, and fiscal year 2002 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. The selected financial data set forth below as of July 1, 2000, June 30, 2001, June 29, 2002, and for the fifty-two week periods ended June 30, 2001 (“fiscal year 2001”) and July 1, 2000 (“fiscal year 2000”) are derived from the consolidated financial statements not included elsewhere herein. In accordance with the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the results of operations of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business for all fiscal years presented have been classified as discontinued operations and prior period results of operations have been reclassified.

Set forth below is a discussion of the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations for fiscal year 2003, fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2001 of the Company. With the exception of Stockholder’s Equity, Redeemable Preferred Stock and an intercompany payable of $1.4 million, the financial condition and results of operations of Eagle are substantially consistent with that of Holdings. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


	Fifty-Two Week Period Ended July 1, 2000			Fifty-Two Week Period Ended June 30, 2001			Fifty-Two Week Period Ended June 29, 2002			Fifty-Two Week Period Ended June 28, 2003			Fifty-Three Week Period Ended July 3, 2004
Statement of Operations Data:^(a)
Net sales	$	155,093		$	156,693		$	116,351		$	105,661		$	115,778
Cost of goods sold		87,944			80,906			79,557			64,150			72,789

Gross profit		67,149			75,787			36,794			41,511			42,989
Distribution expenses		11,081			10,634			6,986			6,405			7,578
Marketing expense		24,199			17,685			10,002			9,132			11,351
General & administrative expense		13,601			13,372			8,794			7,619			7,170
Due diligence and other costs		—			—			—			—			1,516
Amortization of intangible assets		10,504			10,504			8,052			1,660			—
Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges		—			—			18,722			—			—
Other operating income		(1,209	)		—			—			—			—

Operating income		8,973			23,592			21,682			16,695			15,374
Net loss	$	(11,631	)	$	(5,443	)	$	(31,679	)^(b)	$	(54,606	)^(c)	$	(2,403	)
Other Financial Data:
Depreciation and amortization^(d)	$	20,575		$	19,765		$	28,397		$	6,772		$	3,847
Capital expenditures		7,564			3,568			414			610			789

	As of July 1, 2000			As of June 30, 2001			As of June 29, 2002			As of June 28, 2003			As of July 3, 2004
Balance Sheet Data:
Inventories	$	33,780		$	36,929		$	35,491		$	32,594		$	33,298
Net property and equipment		33,775			31,014			8,670			5,574			3,960
Total assets		395,939			386,784			223,042			157,112			148,374
Total debt, including current maturities		327,500			333,500			203,788			193,252			185,688
Redeemable Preferred Stock		113,555			125,163			137,129			151,145			166,905
Stockholders’ deficit		(74,314	)		(91,362	)		(135,802	)		(204,302	)		(222,123	)

(a) The ~~results~~adoption of ~~operations were affected by certain reclassifications made to comply with the new accounting standards,~~ EITF ~~Issue~~ No. 00-14~~, “Accounting~~ ~~for Certain Sales Incentives”~~ and ~~EITF Issue~~ No. 00-25, ~~“Accounting~~effective ~~for~~first ~~Consideration~~quarter ~~from~~of a2002, ~~Vendor~~resulted ~~to a Retailer~~ in ~~Connection~~the ~~with~~following ~~the~~reclassifications ~~Purchase~~to orfiscal ~~Promotion~~year of2000 ~~the~~and ~~Vendor’s~~fiscal ~~Products”.~~year ~~Under~~2001: ~~these~~net ~~Issues,~~sales ~~the EITF~~were ~~concluded~~reduced ~~that~~by ~~certain~~$38.6 ~~consumer~~million and ~~trade~~$35.1 ~~sales promotion expenses~~million, ~~such~~respectively; asdistribution ~~coupon~~expense ~~redemption~~was ~~costs,~~reduced ~~cooperative~~by ~~advertising~~$1.0 ~~programs,~~million ~~new~~and ~~product~~$1.0 ~~introduction fees~~million, ~~feature~~respectively; ~~price discounts~~ and ~~in-store~~marketing ~~display~~expense ~~incentives~~was ~~should~~reduced beby ~~classified as~~$37.6 amillion ~~reduction~~and ~~of sales rather than as marketing expense~~$34.1 ~~The adoption of these Issues~~million, ~~effective~~respectively. inUnder ~~the~~EITF ~~first~~No. ~~calendar~~00-14 ~~quarter~~and ofNo. ~~2002~~00-25, ~~resulted in~~ the ~~following~~EITF ~~reclassifications~~concluded tothat ~~fiscal~~certain ~~year~~consumer ~~2001:~~and ~~net~~trade sales ~~were~~promotion ~~reduced~~expenses byshould ~~$35.1~~be ~~million; distribution~~classified ~~expense~~as ~~was~~a ~~reduced~~reduction byof ~~$1.0~~sales ~~million;~~rather ~~and~~than as marketing expense ~~was reduced by $34~~.1 ~~million.~~ These reclassifications had no impact on operating income, net loss and cash flows.

~~The~~(b) ~~following~~In ~~table~~fiscal ~~sets~~year ~~forth~~2002, the ~~results~~Company ofrecorded ~~operations as~~ a ~~percentage~~valuation ofallowance ~~net~~for ~~sales~~its ~~for~~deferred ~~fiscal~~tax ~~year~~assets ~~2003,~~and ~~fiscal~~net ~~year~~operating ~~2002 and~~loss ~~fiscal~~carryforwards ~~year~~of ~~2001~~$33.2 million.

	Results of Operations
	Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 28, 2003		Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 29, 2002		Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 30, 2001
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold	63.2		62.7		55.3
Cost of goods sold, accelerated depreciation	—		7.7		—
Total cost of goods sold	63.2		70.4		55.3
Gross margin	36.8		29.6		44.7
Distribution expense	6.4		6.3		6.9
Marketing expense	8.7		8.6		10.9
General & administrative expense	5.9		6.1		7.2
Amortization of intangible assets	1.3		5.6		6.0
Gain (loss) on sale of product lines/reorganization	(0.9	)	13.0		—
Operating income	13.6	%	16.0	%	13.7	%

^(c)	In fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $56.6 million upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

In(d) ~~July~~Includes ~~2001,~~ the ~~Company~~ ~~implemented~~amortization ~~the~~of ~~Plan,~~debt ~~which~~issuance ~~reorganized~~costs ~~the~~of ~~management~~$1,823, ~~and~~$2,322, ~~operations~~$2,878, of$1,450, ~~the~~and ~~Company.~~$1,449 ~~This~~for ~~was~~fiscal ~~executed~~year ~~because~~2000, offiscal ~~the~~year ~~ReaLemon~~2001, ~~Sale~~fiscal ~~that~~year ~~had~~2002, ~~reduced~~fiscal ~~the~~year ~~sales~~2003, and ~~operating~~fiscal ~~base~~year of2004, ~~the Company~~respectively.

On September 19, 2001, the Company sold to Motts Inc. and Cadbury Beverages Delaware, Inc. the Company’s business of developing, manufacturing, marketing, distributing and selling shelf-stable juice sold under the ReaLemon and ReaLime brand names and related assets including inventory and the manufacturing facility in Waterloo, New York.

The following table sets forth the unaudited consolidated results of operations of the Company excluding the results of operations of the ReaLemon product lines for fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2001. The information is intended to provide comparable results for the continuing product lines for the periods presented in a manner used by the Company to assist in making internal operating decisions. This data is not intended to represent and should not be considered more meaningful than, or an alternative to, operating income, cash flows from operating activities or other measures of performance in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

~~Results~~Item of7: ~~Operations~~Management’s ~~Excluding~~Discussion ~~the~~and ~~ReaLemon~~Analysis ~~Product~~of ~~Lines~~Financial Condition and Results of Operations

	Fifty-Two Week Period Ended June 28, 2003		Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 29, 2002		Fifty-Two WeekPeriod EndedJune 30, 2001
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold	63.2		64.2		60.2
Cost of goods sold, accelerated depreciation	—		8.4		—
Gross profit	36.8		27.4		39.8
Distribution expense	6.4		6.0		6.3
Marketing expense	8.7		8.7		11.0
General & administrative expense	5.9		6.7		10.4
Amortization of intangible assets	1.3		5.4		5.6
Other operating loss	(0.9	)	—		—
Operating income	13.6	%	0.6	%	6.5	%

Executive Overview

~~Results~~Set forth below is a discussion of ~~Operations~~the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations for fiscal year 2004, fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2002 of the Company. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Fifty~~Eagle and Holdings will file consolidated financial statements of Holdings and its subsidiary, Eagle with the SEC under the guidelines of Regulation S-~~Two~~X ~~Week~~Article ~~Periods~~3, ~~Ended~~Rule ~~June~~3-10(c). 28Eagle is the issuer of a public registered debt that is guaranteed by its parent, ~~2003~~Eagle ~~and~~Family ~~June 29~~Foods Holdings, ~~2002~~Inc. (“Holdings”). Eagle is 100% owned by Holdings; Holdings fully and unconditionally guarantees this registered debt; Holdings has no independent assets or operations; and Holdings has no other subsidiaries.

~~Net Sales.~~ The Company’s ~~net~~has ~~sales for~~significant ~~fiscal~~restrictions ~~year~~on ~~2003~~the ~~were~~ability ~~$128.7~~of ~~million~~Holdings asor ~~compared~~any guarantor to ~~$143.8~~obtain ~~million~~funds ~~for~~from ~~fiscal~~Eagle ~~year~~by ~~2002,~~dividend aor ~~decrease~~loan ofas ~~$15.1~~disclosed ~~million,~~in orNote ~~10.5%.~~7 ~~The~~to ~~table~~the ~~below~~financial ~~sets~~statements ~~forth~~included ~~the~~elsewhere ~~Company’s~~in ~~net~~this ~~sales~~Annual ~~data~~Report ~~for~~Form ~~each~~10-K. ofThe Company has provided the ~~Company’s~~disclosures ~~product~~prescribed ~~lines~~by ~~for~~Rule ~~fiscal~~4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X ~~year~~with ~~2003~~respect ~~and~~to ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~subsidiary ~~2002~~issuers ~~(dollars~~and insubsidiary ~~millions):~~guarantors

Product Lines	Company’s Principal Brands	Net SalesFiscal Year2003		Percentageof Net Sales		Net SalesFiscal Year2002		Percentageof Net Sales
Sweetened condensed milk	Eagle Brand, Meadow Gold, Magnolia, Star and other	$	95.0	73.8	%	$	93.5	65.0	%
Lemon and lime juices	ReaLemon and ReaLime		—	—			11.6	8.1
Non-dairy creamer	Cremora, Cremora Royale		16.6	12.9			18.7	13.0
	Private label, industrial and other		6.5	5.1			8.8	6.1
Niche brand products	Borden, None Such, and Kava		10.6	8.2			11.2	7.8
Total		$	128.7	100.0	%	$	143.8	100.0	%

The Company has classified the Revolving Financing Facility as a current liability in accordance with EITF 95-22. The Revolving Financing Facility is classified as a current liability in accordance with EITF 95-22 since the Financing Agreement contains a subjective acceleration clause and a lock box arrangement that requires the cash receipts of the Company to be used to repay amounts outstanding under the Revolving Financing Facility.

~~Net~~The ~~sales~~discussion and analysis of ~~sweetened~~the Company’s financial condition and ~~condensed~~results ~~milk~~of ~~increased~~operations byrelates $1to the business exclusive of the powdered non-dairy creamer business (“Non-Dairy Creamer Business”) unless otherwise described.5 ~~million~~In ~~for~~accordance ~~fiscal~~with ~~year~~the ~~2003~~provisions asof ~~compared~~SFAS toNo. 144, the results of operations of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business for fiscal year ~~2002.~~2004, ~~The~~fiscal ~~Company~~year ~~experienced~~2003 ~~sales~~and ~~growth~~fiscal ~~with~~year ~~its~~2002 ~~Hispanic~~have ~~branded~~been ~~products~~classified as discontinued operations and ~~within~~prior ~~the~~period ~~private~~results ~~label~~of ~~sweetened~~operations ~~condensed~~have ~~milk~~been ~~business~~reclassified.

On December 24, 2003, the Company sold to Dean Specialty Foods Group, LLC (“Dean Foods”) the Non-Dairy Creamer Business and related assets, including inventory. The ~~decrease~~purchase inprice ~~net~~was ~~sales~~$12.2 million. The Company recognized a loss of $~~15.~~1.0 million ~~from~~on ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~sale, ~~2003~~which asincluded ~~compared~~the book values of $3.4 million, $6.3 tomillion, ~~fiscal~~$2.3 ~~year~~million, ~~2002~~and ~~was~~$0.2 ~~primarily~~million ~~due~~for totrade names, goodwill, inventory, and other prepaid assets, respectively. The Company incurred $111.60 million of ~~lower~~expenses ~~net~~related ~~sales~~to ~~from~~ the ~~ReaLemon~~Non-Dairy ~~product~~Creamer ~~lines~~Sale. OnEffective ~~September~~December 1930, ~~2001~~2002, the Company closed ~~consummated~~the powdered non-dairy creamer manufacturing plant in Chester, South Carolina (“Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure”) and outsourced the ~~ReaLemon~~production ~~Sale~~of powdered non-dairy creamer product to Dean Foods.

~~Non-dairy~~In ~~creamer~~July ~~net~~2001, ~~sales~~the ~~decreased~~Company byimplemented ~~$4.4~~the ~~million~~Plan, ~~for~~which ~~fiscal~~reorganized ~~year~~the management ~~2003~~and asoperations ~~compared~~of tothe ~~fiscal year 2002~~Company. OfThis ~~this decrease,~~was ~~the~~executed ~~retail~~because ~~branded~~of ~~non-dairy~~the ~~creamer~~ReaLemon ~~net~~Sale ~~sales~~that ~~decreased~~had byreduced ~~$2.1~~the ~~million.~~sales ~~The private label~~ and ~~industrial~~operating ~~non-dairy~~base ~~creamer~~of ~~net~~the ~~sales~~Company. ~~decreased~~On bySeptember ~~$2.3~~19, ~~million.~~2001, ~~The~~the Company ~~continues~~sold to ~~experience~~Motts ~~increasingly~~Inc. ~~competitive~~and ~~conditions within~~Cadbury ~~the~~Beverages ~~non-dairy~~Delaware, ~~creamer category~~Inc. the AsCompany’s abusiness ~~result~~ of ~~the~~developing, ~~Non-Dairy~~manufacturing, ~~Creamer~~marketing, ~~Plant~~distributing ~~Closure~~ and ~~the~~selling ~~non~~shelf-~~dairy~~stable ~~creamer~~juice ~~co-pack~~sold ~~agreement~~under ~~mentioned above,~~ the ~~Company~~ReaLemon noand ~~longer~~ReaLime ~~manufactures~~brand ornames ~~markets~~and ~~products~~related ~~within~~assets ~~the~~including ~~private~~inventory ~~label~~ and ~~industrial non-dairy creamer category, but will continue to focus on~~ the ~~branded~~manufacturing ~~non-dairy~~facility ~~creamer~~in Waterloo, ~~product~~New ~~lines~~York.

Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold was $81.3 million for fiscal year 2003 as compared to $101.3 million for fiscal year 2002, a decrease of $20.0 million, or 19.7%. The decrease is due to a $11.1 million charge for accelerated depreciation in fiscal year 2002 which related principally to long-lived assets that were taken out of service before the end of their normal service period, $5.2 million for the ReaLemon product lines in fiscal year 2002, the effect of the lower private label non-dairy creamer sales volume in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal

~~year~~The ~~2002,~~following ~~and~~table ~~lower~~sets ~~raw~~forth ~~material~~the ~~costs,~~results ~~primarily~~of ~~milk.~~operations ~~Expressed~~ as a percentage of net sales, ~~cost of goods sold~~ for fiscal year ~~2003 decreased to 63.2%~~ ~~from~~2004, ~~70.4% for~~ fiscal year ~~2002. This favorable change in percentage is the result of the lower depreciation expense in fiscal year~~ 2003 asand ~~compared to~~ fiscal year 2002.

Distribution Expense. Distribution expense was $8.3 million for fiscal year 2003 as compared to $9.0 million for fiscal year 2002, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 7.8%. The decrease in distribution expense was due to a reduction of $1.1 million for the ReaLemon product lines in fiscal year 2002. This was offset by higher warehousing and freight costs in fiscal year 2003 associated with moving the non-dairy creamer inventory from the plant to third party warehouses in expectation of the Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, distribution expense was 6.4% and 6.3% for fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2002, respectively.


	Results of Operations
	Fifty-Three Week Period Ended July 3, 2004		Fifty-Two Week Period Ended June 28, 2003		Fifty-Two Week Period Ended June 29, 2002
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold	62.9		60.7		58.8
Cost of goods sold, accelerated depreciation	—		—		9.6

Total cost of goods sold	62.9		60.7		68.4
Gross margin	37.1		39.3		31.6
Distribution expense	6.5		6.1		6.0
Marketing expense	9.8		8.6		8.6
General & administrative expense	6.2		7.2		7.6
Due diligence and other costs	1.3		—		—
Amortization of intangible assets	—		1.6		6.9
Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges	—		—		16.1

Operating income	13.3	%	15.8	%	18.6	%

~~Marketing~~Results ~~Expense. Marketing expense was $11.2 million for fiscal year 2003 as compared to $12.3 million for fiscal year 2002, a decrease~~ of ~~$1.1 million, or 8.9%. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, marketing expense was 8.7%~~Operations and 8.6% for fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2002, respectively. The decrease in marketing expense was primarily due to $0.8 million of marketing expense in fiscal year 2002 related to the ReaLemon product lines and a reduction in administrative expenses pursuant to the Plan.

~~General~~Fifty-Three ~~& Administrative~~Week ~~(“G&A”)~~Period ~~Expense.~~Ended ~~G&A~~July ~~expense was $7.6 million for fiscal year 2003 as compared to $8.8 million for fiscal year 2002~~3, ~~a decrease of $1.2 million~~2004, orand ~~13.6%. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, G&A expense~~the ~~was~~Fifty-Two ~~5.9%~~week ~~and~~Period ~~6.1%~~Ended ~~for~~June ~~fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2002~~28, ~~respectively~~2003. ~~The decrease in G&A expense was primarily due to the execution of the Plan as noted above.~~

~~Amortization~~Net Sales. ofThe ~~Intangible~~Company’s ~~Assets.~~net ~~Amortization~~sales offor ~~intangible~~fiscal ~~assets~~year ~~was~~2004 were $1115.8 million as compared to $105.7 million for fiscal year 2003, ~~and~~an increase of $810.1 ~~for~~ ~~fiscal~~million, ~~year~~or ~~2002~~9. ~~In accordance with SFAS No~~6%. ~~142~~The astable ofbelow ~~June~~sets ~~30,~~forth ~~2002,~~ the Company’s ~~will~~net nosales ~~longer~~data ~~amortize~~for ~~indefinite-lived~~each ~~assets,~~of ~~but evaluate~~ the Company’s ~~assets~~product lines for ~~impairment~~fiscal ~~annually.~~year ~~(See~~2004 ~~additional~~and ~~discussion~~fiscal ~~under~~year ~~“Recently~~2003 ~~Adopted Accounting~~(dollars ~~Statements”~~in ~~as described below.~~millions):

Gain (Loss) on Sales of Product Lines, Net of Reorganization Charges and Other Charges. In fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded a charge of $1.7 million to cover severance and other costs associated with the Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure, offset by a $0.5 gain on the sale of the South Carolina Property. In fiscal year 2002, the Company recognized an $18.7 million gain on the ReaLemon Sale, net of reorganization charges of $4.8 million.


Product Lines	Company’s Principal Brands	Net Sales Fiscal Year 2004		Percentage of Net Sales		Net Sales Fiscal Year 2003		Percentage of Net Sales
Sweetened condensed milk	Eagle Brand, Meadow Gold, Magnolia, Star and other	$	104.8	90.5	%	$	95.1	90.0	%
Niche brand products	Borden, None Such, and Kava		11.0	9.5			10.6	10.0

Total		$	115.8	100.0	%	$	105.7	100.0	%

~~Operating~~The ~~Income.~~increase ~~Operating~~in sweetened ~~income~~condensed ~~was~~milk net sales of $179.57 million for fiscal year ~~2003~~ 2004 as compared to ~~$23.1 million for~~ fiscal year ~~2002,~~2003 awas ~~decrease~~due ofto ~~$5.6~~an ~~million,~~increase orin ~~24.2%.~~sales ~~The~~volume ~~decrease~~to ~~results~~an ~~primarily~~Asian ~~from~~private ~~the~~label ~~$18.7~~customer, ~~million~~an ~~gain~~increase ~~on the ReaLemon Sale~~ in ~~fiscal~~sales ~~year~~volume ~~2002,~~of the ~~$4.4~~retail ~~million~~Eagle ofBrand ~~operating income from the~~products ~~ReaLemon~~and ~~product~~increased ~~lines~~sales inof ~~fiscal year 2002, offset by~~ the ~~$11.1~~new ~~million~~product ~~charge~~offering, ~~for~~premium ~~accelerated~~dessert ~~depreciation~~kits. ~~Other~~The ~~factors~~new ~~contributing~~product tooffering, the ~~decrease~~premium ~~were~~dessert ~~the~~kits, ~~$1.2~~utilizes ~~million~~the ~~Non-Dairy~~Company’s ~~Creamer~~Eagle ~~Plant~~Brand ~~Closure~~sweetened ~~charge~~condensed inmilk ~~fiscal~~product ~~year 2003, offset by reductions~~ in ~~administrative~~popular ~~costs,~~sweetened ~~marketing~~condensed ~~expense~~milk ~~and amortization expense as discussed above~~recipes.

~~Interest~~Cost ~~Expense~~of Goods Sold. ~~Net~~Cost ~~interest~~of ~~expense~~goods sold was $1572.6 8 million for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 as compared to $2064.72 million for fiscal year ~~2002~~2003, aan ~~decrease~~increase of $58.1 6 million., ~~The~~or ~~decrease~~13.4%. ~~was~~Expressed ~~primarily~~as ~~due~~a topercentage ~~lower~~of ~~average~~net ~~interest~~sales, ~~rates~~cost ~~and~~of ~~lower~~goods ~~average~~sold ~~debt balances~~ for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 asincreased ~~compared~~ to ~~fiscal~~62.9% ~~year~~from ~~2002~~60.7% ~~The~~for ~~average debt balance is lower in~~ fiscal year 2003. ~~compared~~The toincrease ~~fiscal~~in ~~year~~cost ~~2002~~of asgoods ~~the Company~~sold ~~used~~was ~~$118.0~~primarily ~~million~~due ofto ~~proceeds~~the ~~from~~change in the ~~ReaLemon~~sales ~~Sale~~mix to ~~repay~~products ~~indebtedness~~with ina ~~fiscal~~higher ~~year~~production ~~2002~~cost.

~~Income~~Distribution ~~Taxes~~Expense. ~~Income~~Distribution ~~tax~~ expense was ~~less than~~ $07.16 million for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 as compared to ~~an income tax benefit of~~ $346.14 million for fiscal ~~year~~ ~~2002. In fiscal~~ year ~~2002~~2003, ~~the~~an ~~Company~~increase ~~established a tax valuation allowance for~~ of $331.2 million, ~~for~~or ~~the Company’s net deferred tax assets and net operating loss caryforwards~~18. ~~The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No~~8%. ~~109~~Expressed ~~“Accounting~~as ~~for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”) which requires the recording of~~ a ~~valuation~~percentage ~~allowance when it is probable that any or all~~ of ~~the deferred~~net ~~tax assets will not be realized. In absence of favorable factors~~sales, ~~application~~distribution ofexpense ~~SFAS~~was No6.5% ~~109~~and ~~requires a 100~~6.1% ~~valuation allowance~~ for ~~any~~fiscal ~~net~~year ~~deferred~~2004 ~~tax~~and ~~assets~~fiscal ~~when~~year ~~a company has cumulative financial accounting losses~~2003, ~~excluding unusual items, over several years~~respectively. The ~~Company~~increase ~~has experienced pretax losses over the past several years, excluding the gain~~ in ~~fiscal~~distribution ~~year~~expense ~~2002~~was ondue ~~the ReaLemon Sale. Management continues~~ to ~~see~~costs ~~lower~~associated ~~industry~~with ~~market~~storing ~~values in the current economic~~and ~~environment~~handling ~~which could affect~~ the ~~tax~~new ~~planning~~premium ~~strategies~~dessert ~~available~~kits toand ~~the~~higher ~~Company~~transportation costs. ~~Therefore, the Company will continue to~~

~~maintain~~Marketing aExpense. ~~full~~Marketing ~~valuation~~expense ~~allowance~~was ~~for~~$11.4 ~~its~~million ~~net~~for ~~deferred~~fiscal ~~tax~~year ~~assets~~2004 ~~and~~as ~~net~~compared ~~operating~~to ~~loss~~$9.1 million ~~carryforwards~~for ~~until~~fiscal ~~sufficient~~year ~~positive~~2003, ~~evidence~~an ~~exists~~increase toof ~~support reversal~~$2.3 ofmillion, ~~the~~or ~~reserve~~25.3%. ~~Until~~Expressed ~~such~~as ~~time~~a percentage of net sales, ~~except~~marketing expense was 9.8% and 8.6% for ~~minor~~fiscal ~~state~~year 2004 and ~~local~~fiscal ~~tax~~year ~~provisions~~2003, respectively. The increase was due to the Company’s investment ~~will~~in ~~have~~the nodevelopment, ~~reported~~test ~~tax~~marketing ~~provision,~~and ~~net~~promotion of ~~valuation~~new ~~allowance~~premium ~~adjustments~~dessert kits utilizing popular sweetened condensed milk recipes. In addition, the increase was due to marketing efforts to capture incremental opportunities within the growing Hispanic market.

InGeneral ~~determining~~& ~~the~~Administrative (“G&A”) ~~amount~~Expense. ofG&A ~~the~~expense ~~deferred~~was ~~tax~~$7.2 ~~asset~~million ~~valuation~~for ~~allowance,~~fiscal ~~the~~year ~~Company~~2004 ~~estimated~~as ~~the~~compared ~~current~~to ~~tax~~$7.6 ~~deductibility of~~million ~~certain~~for ~~costs~~fiscal ~~and~~year ~~charges~~2003, ~~and~~a ~~evaluated~~decrease ~~the fair market value~~ of ~~the~~$0.4 ~~Company~~million, inor ~~comparison to the tax value~~5.3%. ~~These~~Expressed ~~estimates~~as ~~are~~a ~~subject~~percentage toof ~~change.~~net ~~Any~~sales, ~~differences~~G&A ~~between~~expense ~~these~~was ~~current~~6.2% ~~estimates~~ and ~~actual values determined at a future date~~7.2% ~~will~~for ~~result~~fiscal inyear a2004 ~~change to the valuation allowance~~ and ~~will~~fiscal beyear ~~recorded~~2003, ~~at that date~~respectively.

~~Fifty-Two~~Due ~~Week~~Diligence ~~Periods~~and ~~Ended~~Other ~~June~~Costs. ~~29,~~Due ~~2002~~diligence and ~~June~~other 30costs were $1.5 million for fiscal year 2004. The Company recorded a charge of $0.7 million for due diligence costs related to an unsuccessful acquisition attempt, ~~2001~~and a charge of $0.8 million for an incentive payment to certain management members for successfully completing the sale of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business.

~~Net~~Amortization ~~Sales.~~of ~~The~~Intangible ~~Company’s~~Assets. ~~net~~Amortization ~~sales~~of ~~for~~intangible ~~fiscal~~assets ~~year~~was ~~2002 were~~ $~~143~~1.87 million ~~as compared to $185.6 million~~ for fiscal year ~~2001, a decrease of $41~~2003.8 ~~million, or 22.5%.~~ The ~~table below sets forth the~~ Company’s ~~net~~only ~~sales~~amortizable intangible ~~data~~asset ~~for~~was ~~each~~a ofcovenant ~~the~~not ~~Company’s~~to ~~product~~compete. ~~lines~~This ~~for~~asset ~~fiscal~~was ~~year~~fully ~~2002~~amortized ~~and~~in fiscal year ~~2001~~2003. ~~(dollars in millions):~~

Product Lines	Company’s Principal Brands	Net SalesFiscal Year2002		Percentageof Net Sales		Net SalesFiscal Year2001		Percentageof NetSales
Sweetened condensed milk	Eagle Brand, Meadow Gold, Magnolia, Star and other	$	93.5	65.0	%	$	89.7	48.3	%
Non-dairy creamer	Cremora, Cremora Royale		18.7	13.0			20.6	11.1
	Private label and other		8.8	6.1			8.3	4.5
Lemon and lime juices	ReaLemon and ReaLime		11.6	8.1			55.5	29.9
Niche brand products	Borden, None Such, Kava		11.2	7.8			11.3	6.1
Lemonade liquid concentrate	ReaLemonade		—	—			0.2	0.1
Total		$	143.8	100.0	%	$	185.6	100.0	%

Operating Income. Operating income was $15.4 million for fiscal year 2004 as compared to $16.7 million for fiscal year 2003, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 7.8%. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, operating income for fiscal year 2004 decreased to 13.3% from 15.8% for fiscal year 2003. The decrease in operating income was due to due diligence and other costs, the change in product sales mix and the cost of launching the new premium dessert product offering.

~~The~~Interest ~~decrease~~Expense. inNet ~~net sales~~interest expense was ~~primarily~~$16.0 ~~attributable~~million for fiscal year 2004 as compared to ~~the~~$14.9 ~~sale~~million for fiscal year 2003, an increase of ~~the~~$1.1 ~~ReaLemon~~million, ~~product~~or ~~lines~~7.4%. inIn ~~September~~accordance ~~2001~~with SFAS No. 144, ~~resulting~~interest expense intotaling a$0.3 ~~decrease~~million ofand $430.97 million infor ~~lemon~~fiscal year 2004 and ~~lime~~fiscal ~~juice~~year ~~net~~2003, ~~sales.~~respectively, ~~The~~was ~~decrease~~charged inagainst income from discontinued operations, and represented the ~~net~~interest ~~sales~~associated ofwith the ~~non~~Non-~~dairy~~Dairy ~~creamer~~Creamer ~~product~~Business. ~~line~~The increase in interest expense was ~~the~~ ~~result~~due to a higher average interest rate of ~~increased~~9.11% ~~marketing~~in ~~initiatives~~fiscal byyear ~~the~~2004 ~~Company’s~~as ~~competitors~~compared to an average interest rate of 8.11% in fiscal year 2003. The ~~increase~~average debt balance in ~~sweetened~~fiscal ~~condensed~~year ~~milk~~2004 ~~product~~was ~~net~~$178.9 ~~sales~~million ofas compared $3191.87 million ~~was~~in ~~primarily~~fiscal ~~due~~year to2003. ~~higher~~The ~~sales~~Company ~~volumes~~used ~~for~~the ~~sweetened~~proceeds ~~condensed~~from ~~milk~~the ~~private~~sale ~~label~~of ~~and Hispanic~~the ~~brands~~Non-Dairy Creamer Business to repay indebtedness in fiscal year 2004.

~~Cost~~Costs ofRelated ~~Goods~~to ~~Sold~~Refinancing. ~~Cost~~Costs ofrelated ~~goods~~to ~~sold was~~refinancing were $~~101~~1.3 million for fiscal year ~~2002 as compared to $102~~2004.7 ~~million~~The ~~for~~Company ~~fiscal~~recorded ~~year 2001,~~ a ~~decrease~~write-off of $1.43 million, for ~~or 1.4%. In fiscal year 2002,~~ the ~~Company~~unamortized ~~recorded~~financing ~~$11.1~~fees ~~million of accelerated depreciation~~ related ~~principally~~ to ~~long-lived assets that were taken out of service before~~ the ~~end~~extinguished ofTerm ~~their~~Loan ~~normal service period due to the Plan~~Facility. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased to 70.4% from 55.3% for 2001. The increase in the percentage was due to the charge for the accelerated depreciation, an increase in the sales of lower priced industrial and private label non-dairy creamer products, and higher raw material costs, principally milk and sugar used in the production of sweetened condensed milk. In early fiscal year 2002, milk prices rose to levels significantly above historical averages and negatively affected costs of goods sold.

~~Distribution~~Income ~~Expense~~Taxes. ~~Distribution~~Income tax expense was less than $9.0.1 million for fiscal year ~~2002~~2004 as compared to ~~$12.9~~an ~~million~~income ~~for~~tax ~~fiscal~~benefit ~~year~~of ~~2001,~~less athan ~~decrease of~~ $30.91 million, orfor 30fiscal year 2003.~~2%.~~ The ~~decrease~~expense inresulted ~~distribution~~from ~~expense~~estimated isstate and ~~primarily~~local ~~due~~income ~~to $3~~taxes.6 ~~million~~The ~~reduction~~Company ~~after~~is ~~the~~carrying ~~sale~~a offull ~~the~~valuation ~~ReaLemon~~allowance ~~product~~for ~~lines.~~its ~~Expressed as a percentage of~~ net ~~sales,~~deferred ~~distribution~~tax ~~expense~~assets ~~was 6.3%~~ and ~~7.0%~~net ~~for~~operating ~~fiscal year~~loss ~~2002~~carryforwards ~~and~~until ~~fiscal~~such ~~year~~time ~~2001,~~that ~~respectively.~~sufficient ~~The~~positive ~~decrease~~evidence ofexists ~~0.7% was primarily due~~ to ~~a reduction in administrative~~ support ~~staff~~realization inof ~~fiscal~~these ~~year~~tax ~~2002 pursuant to the Plan and reduced distribution expense associated with the ReaLemon product lines~~assets.

~~Marketing~~Income ~~Expense~~from Discontinued Operations. ~~Marketing~~Income ~~expense~~from discontinued operations was $120.3 6 million for fiscal year ~~2002~~2004 as compared to $200.31 million for fiscal year ~~2001, a decrease of $8~~2003.0 ~~million,~~This orrepresents ~~39.4%. The decrease was primarily due to~~ the ~~reduction~~results inof ~~marketing~~operations ~~administrative~~of ~~costs related to~~ the ~~Plan~~Non-Dairy ~~and~~Creamer $5Business.3 ~~million~~The ~~reduction after~~Company ~~the~~sold ~~sale of~~ the ~~ReaLemon~~Non-Dairy ~~product~~Creamer ~~lines.~~Business ~~Expressed~~on ~~as a percentage of net sales~~December 24, ~~marketing~~2003 ~~expense for fiscal year 2002 decreased~~ to ~~8.6%~~Dean ~~from 10~~Foods.9% ~~for fiscal year 2001.~~

Loss on Disposal of Discontinued Operations. In fiscal year 2004, the Company recorded a loss of $1.0 million for the Non-Dairy Creamer Sale.

~~G&A~~Fifty-Two ~~Expense.~~Week ~~G&A~~Periods ~~expense~~Ended ~~was~~June ~~$8.8 million for fiscal year 2002 as compared to $13.4 million for fiscal year 2001~~28, a2003 ~~decrease of $4.6 million, or 34.3%. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, G&A expense was 6.1%~~ and ~~7.2%~~June ~~for fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2001~~29, ~~respectively~~2002. ~~The decrease in G&A expense was primarily due to the execution of the Plan as noted above.~~

~~Amortization of~~Net ~~Intangible Assets~~Sales. ~~Amortization~~The ofCompany’s ~~intangible~~net ~~assets~~sales ~~was~~for fiscal year 2003 were $8105.07 million as compared to $116.4 million for fiscal year 2002, ~~and~~a decrease of $1110.27 ~~for~~million, ~~fiscal~~or ~~year 2001~~9.2%. The ~~decrease~~table isbelow ~~due~~sets toforth the ~~write-off~~Company’s ofnet ~~the~~sales ~~net~~data ~~book~~for ~~value~~each of ~~certain~~the ~~tradenames~~Company’s ~~and~~product ~~other~~lines ~~intangible~~for ~~assets~~fiscal ~~sold pursuant~~year to2003 ~~the~~and ~~ReaLemon~~fiscal ~~Sale.~~year 2002 (dollars in millions):

Gain (Loss) on Sales of Product Lines, Net of Reorganization Charges and Other Charges. In fiscal year 2002, the Company recognized an $18.7 million gain on the ReaLemon Sale, net of reorganization charges of $4.8 million.


Product Lines	Company’s Principal Brands	Net Sales Fiscal Year 2003		Percentage of Net Sales		Net Sales Fiscal Year 2002		Percentage of Net Sales
Sweetened condensed milk	Eagle Brand, Meadow Gold, Magnolia, Star and other	$	95.1	90.0	%	$	93.5	80.3	%
Niche brand products	Borden, None Such, Kava		10.6	10.0			11.3	9.7
Lemon and lime juices	ReaLemon and ReaLime		—	—			11.6	10.0

Total		$	105.7	100.0	%	$	116.4	100.0	%

~~Operating~~Net ~~Income.~~sales ~~Operating~~of ~~income~~sweetened condensed ~~was~~milk product increased by $~~23.~~1.6 million for fiscal year ~~2002~~ 2003 as compared to ~~$25.3 million for~~ fiscal year ~~2001, a decrease of $2~~2002.2 ~~million,~~The orCompany ~~8.7%.~~experienced ~~Together~~sales ~~with~~growth ~~other~~for ~~factors~~its ~~discussed~~Hispanic ~~above,~~branded ~~the~~products ~~decrease~~and inwithin ~~operating income was primarily due to~~ the ~~charge~~private oflabel ~~accelerated~~sweetened ~~depreciation,~~condensed ~~lost ReaLemon~~milk ~~operating income opportunity after the ReaLemon Sale, offset by the gain on the ReaLemon Sale~~business.

~~Interest~~This ~~Expense.~~increase ~~Net~~in ~~interest~~net ~~expense~~sales was ~~$20.7~~offset ~~million~~by ~~for~~a ~~fiscal~~decrease ~~year~~in ~~2002 as compared to~~ net ~~interest~~sales ~~expense~~from ~~of $33.2 million for fiscal year~~the ~~2001,~~ReaLemon aproduct ~~decrease of $12~~lines.5 ~~million.~~On ~~The~~September ~~decrease~~19, ~~was primarily due to lower average interest rates and lower average debt balances during 2002. The average debt balance was lower for fiscal year 2002 compared to fiscal year~~ 2001, ~~as proceeds from~~ the ~~ReaLemon~~ ~~Sale~~Company ~~were~~consummated ~~used to repay indebtedness under~~ the ~~Term~~ReaLemon ~~Loan Facility~~Sale.

~~Income~~Cost ~~Taxes.~~of ~~The~~Goods ~~Company~~Sold. ~~recorded~~Cost anof ~~income~~goods ~~tax~~sold ~~expense~~was of $3464.12 million for fiscal year ~~2002~~2003 as compared to a $279.96 million ~~income tax benefit~~ for fiscal year ~~2001.~~2002, ~~The Company established~~ a ~~tax~~decrease ~~valuation~~of ~~allowance for~~ $3315.24 million, ~~for~~or ~~the~~19.3%. ~~Company’s~~The ~~net~~decrease ~~deferred~~is ~~tax~~due ~~assets~~to ~~and~~an ~~net operating loss caryforwards~~$11.1 ~~The~~million ~~valuation~~charge ~~allowance~~for ~~was~~accelerated ~~calculated~~depreciation in ~~accordance~~fiscal ~~with~~year ~~the~~2002, ~~provisions of SFAS No. 109~~ which ~~requires~~related ~~the~~principally ~~recording~~to oflong-lived aassets ~~valuation allowance when it is probable~~ that ~~any~~were ortaken ~~all~~out of ~~the~~service ~~deferred~~before ~~tax~~the ~~assets~~end ~~will~~of ~~not~~their benormal ~~realized.~~service ~~In absence of favorable factors~~period, and ~~application~~the ~~of SFAS No~~$5.2 ~~109~~million ~~requires~~reduction ain ~~100%~~cost ~~valuation~~of ~~allowance~~goods ~~for~~sold ~~any~~attributable ~~net~~to ~~deferred tax assets when a company has cumulative financial accounting losses, excluding unusual items, over several years. The Company experienced pretax losses over~~ the ~~past~~ReaLemon ~~three~~product ~~years,~~lines ~~excluding the gain~~ in fiscal year 2002 ~~on the ReaLemon Sale~~. ~~Management~~The ~~saw~~decrease ~~lower~~was ~~industry market~~offset ~~values~~by in the ~~economic~~cost ~~environment~~of ~~during~~goods ~~the~~sold ~~reported~~associated ~~periods~~with ~~which could affect~~ the ~~tax~~increased ~~planning~~sales ~~strategies~~volume ~~available~~as todiscussed ~~the~~above ~~Company~~under net sales. AsExpressed as a ~~result~~percentage of ~~these~~net ~~factors~~sales, ~~the~~cost ~~Company~~of ~~recorded~~goods asold ~~full~~for ~~valuation~~fiscal ~~allowance~~year ~~under~~2003 ~~the~~decreased ~~provisions~~to of60.7% ~~SFAS No~~from 68.4% ~~109~~for 2002.

InDistribution ~~determining~~Expense. ~~the~~Distribution ~~amount~~expense ofwas ~~the~~$6.4 ~~deferred~~million ~~tax~~for ~~asset valuation~~fiscal ~~allowance,~~year ~~the~~2003 ~~Company~~as ~~estimated~~compared ~~the~~to ~~current~~$7.0 ~~tax~~million ~~deductibility~~for offiscal ~~certain~~year ~~costs and charges~~2002, ~~and~~a ~~evaluated~~decrease ~~the~~of $0.6 ~~fair~~million, ~~market~~or ~~value~~8.6%. ofThe ~~the~~decrease ~~Company~~ in ~~comparison~~distribution toexpense ~~the~~was ~~tax~~due ~~value.~~to ~~These~~a ~~estimates~~reduction ~~are~~of ~~subject to change~~$1.1 ~~Any~~million ~~differences~~for ~~between these~~the ~~current~~ReaLemon ~~estimates~~product ~~and~~lines ~~actual~~in ~~values~~fiscal ~~determined~~year at2002. aThis ~~future~~was ~~date~~offset ~~will~~by ~~result~~an increase in adistribution ~~change~~expense toprimarily ~~the~~due ~~valuation~~to ~~allowance~~increased ~~and~~sales volume. ~~will~~Expressed beas ~~recorded~~a atpercentage ~~that~~of ~~date.~~net ~~Excluding~~sales, ~~the~~distribution ~~valuation~~expense ~~allowance,~~for ~~the~~fiscal ~~increase~~year ~~was~~2003 ~~primarily~~increased ~~due~~ to ~~the~~6.1% ~~gain~~from on6.0% ~~the ReaLemon~~for ~~Sale~~fiscal year 2002.

~~Liquidity~~Marketing Expense. Marketing expense was $9.1 million for fiscal year 2003 as compared to $10.0 million for fiscal year 2002, a decrease of $0.9 million, or 9.0%. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, marketing expense was 8.6% for fiscal year 2003 and ~~Capital~~fiscal ~~Resources~~year 2002. The decrease in marketing expense was primarily due to $0.8 million of marketing expense in fiscal year 2002 related to the ReaLemon product lines.

~~Borrowings~~G&A ~~under the Term Loan Facility were $52~~Expense.3 ~~million~~G&A ~~and~~expense was $537.26 million atfor ~~June~~fiscal ~~28,~~year 2003 ~~and~~as ~~June~~compared ~~29,~~to ~~2002, respectively. The Term Loan Facility matures~~ $8.68 million, ~~$25.0~~for ~~million and $18.7 million in the~~ fiscal ~~years~~year ~~2004 through 2006~~2002, ~~respectively. The Company has~~ a ~~$50.0~~decrease ~~million Revolving Credit Facility,~~ of ~~which~~ $261.02 million, ~~and~~or ~~$35~~13.6%. ~~million~~Expressed ~~was~~as ~~outstanding~~a atpercentage ~~June~~of ~~28,~~net ~~2003 and June 29~~sales, ~~2002,~~G&A ~~respectively.~~expense ~~Included~~for infiscal ~~the~~year ~~Revolving~~2003 ~~Credit~~decreased ~~Facility~~to is7.2% afrom ~~$10~~7.06% for ~~million~~fiscal ~~swingline~~year ~~loan~~2002. ~~that~~The isdecrease ~~utilized~~in ~~for~~G&A ~~short-term~~expense ~~borrowings~~was ~~for periods~~primarily ~~less~~due ~~than~~to ~~thirty~~the ~~days.~~execution ~~The~~of ~~Revolving~~the ~~Credit~~Plan ~~Facility~~as ~~matures~~noted ~~in fiscal year 2005~~above.

~~Interest~~Amortization ~~payments~~of onIntangible ~~the~~Assets. ~~Notes~~Amortization ~~and~~of ~~interest~~intangible ~~and~~assets ~~principal~~was ~~payments~~$1.7 ~~under~~million ~~the~~for ~~Term~~fiscal ~~Loan~~year ~~Facility~~2003 and ~~the~~$8.1 ~~Revolving~~for ~~Credit~~fiscal ~~Facility~~year ~~represent~~2002. ~~significant~~The decrease ~~cash~~is ~~requirements~~due ~~for~~to the ~~Company.~~write-off ~~Borrowings~~of ~~under~~ the ~~Term~~net ~~Loan Facility~~book ~~and~~value ~~the~~of ~~Revolving~~certain ~~Credit~~tradenames ~~Facility~~and ~~bear~~other ~~interest~~intangible atassets ~~floating~~sold ~~rates~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~require~~the ~~interest~~ReaLemon ~~payments on varying dates~~Sale.

Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges. In fiscal year 2002, the Company recognized an $18.7 million gain on the ReaLemon Sale, inclusive of a reorganization charge of $4.8 million.

Operating Income (Loss). Operating income was $16.7 million for fiscal year 2003 as compared to $21.7 million for fiscal year 2002, a decrease of $5.0 million, or 23.0%. The decrease was due primarily to the $18.7 million gain on the ReaLemon Sale in fiscal year 2002, the $4.4 million of operating income from the ReaLemon product lines in fiscal year 2002, offset by the $11.1 million charge for accelerated depreciation in fiscal year 2002 and reductions in administrative costs, marketing expense and amortization as discussed above.

~~The~~Interest ~~Company~~Expense. ~~amended~~Net ~~its~~interest ~~Credit~~expense ~~Agreement~~was ~~pursuant~~$14.9 tomillion anfor ~~amendment~~fiscal ~~dated~~year ~~November~~2003 ~~21,~~as ~~2002.~~compared ~~Pursuant~~ to net ~~the~~interest ~~Amendment,~~expense ~~the~~of ~~lenders~~$19.9 ~~waived~~million ~~compliance with certain coverage ratio financial covenants~~ for ~~the~~fiscal ~~period~~year ~~commencing~~2002, ona ~~and~~decrease ~~including~~of ~~December~~$5.0 29million, ~~2002~~or ~~and ending on and including the Revolving Credit Facility maturity date~~25.1%. The ~~Amendment~~decrease ~~includes restrictions~~in oninterest ~~the~~expense ~~carrying~~was ~~balance~~due ofto ~~the~~a ~~Revolving~~lower ~~Credit~~average ~~Facility~~interest ~~for~~rate ~~a period~~ of ~~thirty~~8.11% ~~consecutive~~in ~~days~~fiscal ~~commencing on a date not earlier than December of any~~ year ~~and~~2003 ~~ending~~as ~~not~~compared ~~later~~to ~~than~~an ~~January~~average 31interest rate of ~~the following year~~9.18% ~~The Amendment also~~in ~~sets~~fiscal ~~forth~~year minimum requirements for consolidated earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization, sets forth maximum requirements for capital expenditures, and changed the total allowable commitment and interest rates2002. The ~~Company~~ isaverage indebt ~~compliance~~balance ~~with~~in ~~the~~fiscal ~~abovementioned~~year ~~covenants~~2003 ~~and~~was it$191.7 ~~believes~~million itas ~~can~~compared ~~meet existing bank covenants pursuant~~ to ~~the~~$225.5 ~~Credit~~million ~~Agreement,~~in asfiscal ~~amended,~~year ~~for each of the next four quarters ending July 3, 2004~~2002.

~~The~~Income ~~Company’s~~Taxes. ~~ability~~Income tax benefit was less than $0.1 million for fiscal year 2003 as compared to ~~meet~~an ~~the~~income ~~bank~~tax ~~covenants~~expense ~~will~~of be$34.1 ~~dependent~~million ~~upon~~for fiscal year 2002. In fiscal year 2002, the Company’s ~~future~~established ~~performance,~~a ~~which~~tax ~~will~~valuation beallowance ~~subject~~for to$33.2 ~~general~~million ~~economic~~for ~~conditions~~the Company’s net deferred tax assets and ~~financial~~net ~~operations~~operating loss carryforwards. ~~There~~The ~~can~~valuation beallowance nowas ~~assurance~~provided ~~that~~as the Company’s ~~future~~has experienced ~~performance~~pretax ~~will~~losses ~~not~~over bethe ~~affected~~past ~~negatively~~several byyears, ~~changes~~excluding the gain in fiscal year 2002 on the ~~above factors~~ReaLemon Sale. Management continues to ~~such~~see alower ~~degree~~industry ~~that~~market itvalues ~~affects~~in the ~~Company’s~~current ~~ability~~economic toenvironment ~~meet~~which ~~bank~~could ~~covenants.~~affect ~~There~~the ~~can~~tax planning bestrategies noavailable ~~assurance~~to ~~that~~the Company. Therefore, the Company ~~could~~will ~~renegotiate~~continue ~~its~~to ~~covenants,~~maintain ~~refinance~~a full valuation allowance for its ~~debt,~~net ordeferred ~~obtain~~tax ~~terms~~assets ~~that~~and ~~are~~net ~~favorable~~operating toloss ~~the~~carryforwards ~~financial~~until ~~position~~sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of the reserve. Until such time, except for minor state and local tax provisions, the Company will have no reported tax provision, net of valuation allowance adjustments.

~~The~~In ~~Company’s~~determining ~~remaining~~the ~~liquidity~~amount ~~needs are~~of ~~for~~the ~~capital~~deferred ~~expenditures~~tax ~~and~~asset ~~increases~~valuation inallowance, ~~working~~the ~~capital. The~~ Company ~~spent~~estimated ~~$0.6~~the ~~million~~current ontax ~~capital~~deductibility of ~~projects~~certain incosts ~~fiscal~~and ~~year~~charges, ~~2003~~and toevaluated ~~fund~~the ~~expenditures~~fair atmarket ~~existing~~value ~~facilities.~~of ~~The~~the Company ~~expects~~in comparison to ~~spend~~the ~~approximately~~tax $1value.0 ~~million~~These onestimates ~~capital projects~~are insubject ~~the~~to ~~Company’s~~change. ~~fiscal~~Any ~~year~~differences ~~ending~~between ~~July~~these 3,current ~~2004~~estimates toand ~~fund~~actual ~~expenditures~~values determined at ~~existing~~a ~~facilities.~~future ~~The~~date will ~~Company’s~~result ~~primary~~in ~~sources~~a ofchange ~~liquidity~~to ~~are~~the ~~cash~~valuation ~~flows~~allowance ~~from operations~~ and ~~available~~will ~~borrowings~~be ~~under~~recorded ~~the~~at ~~Revolving~~that ~~Credit Facility~~date.

~~Net~~Income ~~cash~~from ~~provided~~Discontinued Operations. Income from ~~operating~~discontinued ~~activities~~operations was $110.81 million ~~and~~ ~~$3.0 million~~ for fiscal year 2003 and $0.7 million for fiscal year 2002~~, respectively~~. ~~The~~As ~~increase~~mentioned inabove, ~~net~~income ~~cash~~ from ~~operating~~discontinued ~~activities~~operations represent isthe ~~primarily~~results ~~due~~of tooperations ~~effective~~of ~~cost~~the ~~reductions~~Non-Dairy inCreamer ~~administrative expenditures and lower interest expense~~Business.

~~Cash~~Liquidity ~~used in investing activities in fiscal year 2003 was minimal~~ and ~~cash from~~Capital ~~investing~~Resources activities in fiscal year 2002 was $128.1 million, a decrease of $128.0 million. In fiscal year 2003, the Company received $0.6 million in proceeds from the sale of the South Carolina Property, offset by $0.6 million of capital expenditures. In fiscal year 2002, the Company received $128.4 million in proceeds from the Realemon Sale.

~~Cash~~On ~~used~~March in23, 2004, ~~financing~~the ~~activities~~Company ~~was~~entered ~~$11.1~~into ~~million~~the Financing Agreement by and ~~$131.3~~among ~~million~~Eagle, inHoldings, ~~fiscal~~as ~~year~~a ~~2003~~guarantor, and inthe ~~fiscal~~Lenders, ~~year~~Fortress, ~~2002~~as collateral agent for the Lenders, ~~respectively~~and Congress, as administrative agent for the Lenders. The Financing Agreement provides for a ~~decrease~~secured revolving credit facility that consists of (1) an asset-based revolving credit facility (“Revolver A”) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $~~120~~27.2 0 million. Inat ~~fiscal~~any ~~year~~time ~~2002~~outstanding, including a subfacility for the ~~Company~~issuance ~~used~~of letters of credit in an aggregate amount not to exceed $~~118~~5.0 million, ofand ~~proceeds~~(2) ~~from~~a ~~the~~revolving ~~ReaLemon~~credit ~~Sale~~facility to(“Revolver ~~repay~~B”, aand ~~portion~~together ofwith ~~the~~Revolver ~~indebtedness~~A, ~~under~~ the ~~Term~~“Revolving ~~Loan~~Financing Facility.”) ~~The~~in ~~Company~~an ~~was~~aggregate ~~also~~principal amount ~~able~~not to ~~reduce~~exceed ~~its~~$55.0 ~~Revolving~~million. ~~Credit~~As ~~Facility~~of inJuly ~~fiscal year~~3, ~~2003~~2004, ~~due~~the toborrowings ~~generating~~were ~~higher~~$15.7 ~~operating~~million ~~cash~~under ~~flows~~Revolver A and $55.0 million under Revolver B.

~~Management~~On ~~believes~~September ~~that~~20, ~~cash~~2004, ~~generated~~the ~~from~~Company ~~operations~~entered ~~and~~into ~~borrowings~~a ~~under~~First ~~the~~Amendment ~~Term~~to ~~Loan~~Financing ~~Facility~~Agreement ~~and~~ (the ~~Revolving~~“First ~~Credit~~Amendment”) ~~Facility~~by ~~will~~and beamong ~~sufficient~~Holdings, toas guarantor, ~~satisfy~~Eagle, ~~working~~as ~~capital~~borrower, ~~requirements~~certain ~~and~~financial ~~required~~institutions ~~capital~~from ~~expenditures.~~time ~~Further expansion~~to oftime ~~the~~party ~~business~~thereto, ~~through~~Fortress, ~~acquisitions~~as ~~may~~collateral ~~require~~agent for the ~~Company~~Lenders, toand ~~incur~~Congress, ~~additional~~as ~~indebtedness~~administrative oragent tofor ~~sell~~the ~~additional~~Lenders. ~~equity~~The ~~securities.~~First ~~There~~Amendment ~~can~~temporarily beincreases nothe principal ~~assurance~~amount ~~that~~available ~~the~~for ~~Company~~borrowing ~~will~~under beRevolver ~~able~~A from $27.0 million to ~~secure~~$30.0 ~~additional~~million ~~financing~~through onand ~~favorable terms,~~including ifNovember at3, ~~all~~2004.

~~GEI~~The Revolving Financing Facility contains financial covenants, which require the Company to meet certain financial tests including senior debt leverage, fixed charge coverage, and ~~Warburg~~consolidated earnings before interest, ~~Holdings’~~income tax, and depreciation and amortization expenses. The Company is required to reduce the outstanding principal amount of Revolver B to specific amounts by December 31 of each of ~~stockholders~~the next three years. The principal amount as of December 31, ~~each~~2004 ~~owned~~is to be less than $1434.17 million. inIn ~~aggregate~~addition, ~~principal~~the Company is restricted from accumulating or maintaining an aggregate amount of ~~Notes~~cash asin bank accounts, other cash equivalents and investments in excess of ~~August~~$2.0 18million for a period of more than ten consecutive business days, ~~2003~~subject to certain exceptions as permitted by the Financing Agreement. The Revolving Financing Facility includes a subjective acceleration clause and a lockbox arrangement, which provides for all cash receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Financing Facility.

Significant Events in Fiscal Year 2003

Effective December 30, 2002, the Company closed its powdered non-dairy creamer manufacturing plant in Chester, South Carolina. Production is now sourced from a third party manufacturer under a long-term co-pack agreement entered into on October 1, 2002. The third party manufacturer has significantly larger powdered non-dairy creamer plants than the Company had and has agreed to produce the Company’s powdered non-dairy creamer requirements at a lower cost than the Company’s cost of production. During fiscal year 2003, the Company sold the South Carolina Property for $0.5 million.

InThe ~~connection~~Revolving ~~with~~Financing ~~the~~Facility ~~Non-Dairy~~also ~~Creamer~~contains ~~Plant~~covenants ~~Closure,~~including ~~the~~limitations ~~Company~~on ~~recorded~~liens, ~~a charge $1.2 million in~~indebtedness, ~~fiscal~~dispositions, ~~year~~acquisitions, ~~2003~~mergers, ~~and~~consolidations, ~~included~~changes ~~the~~in ~~expense within~~ the ~~classification~~nature of ~~“Gain~~business, ~~(loss)~~loans, onadvances, ~~sale of product lines~~investments, ~~net~~sale ~~of reorganization charges~~ and ~~other~~leaseback ~~charges”~~transactions, oncapital ~~the~~expenditures, ~~Consolidated~~transactions ~~Statements~~with ofaffiliates, ~~Operations~~dividends and ~~Comprehensive~~other ~~Income~~payments, ~~(Loss).~~issuances of ~~The~~capital ~~closure~~stock ~~charges included $1.3 million for termination pay~~ and ~~benefits~~excess ~~for the 79 displaced employees, $0~~cash.4 ~~million~~The ~~for~~Revolving ~~other~~Financing ~~plant~~Facility ~~closure~~contains ~~costs~~customary ~~and~~events ~~contractual~~of ~~expenditures~~default, ~~offset~~including bycertain achanges ~~$0.5~~in ~~million~~control ~~gain on the sale~~ of the ~~South Carolina Property~~Company. AsThe ofCompany ~~June~~is ~~28,~~currently ~~2003,~~in ~~the~~compliance ~~remaining~~with ~~cash~~the ~~requirements~~covenants of the ~~Non-Dairy~~Financing ~~Creamer Plant Closure are expected to total $0~~Agreement.~~3 million and are expected to be paid by December 2003.~~

~~Commitments~~The proceeds from the Revolving Financing Facility were used, in part, to repay all amounts outstanding under the Company’s previous senior bank facilities and ~~Contingencies~~will be used, in part, to fund working capital of the Company and for other general corporate purposes.

~~The~~Interest ~~Company~~payments ~~may~~on ~~enter into long-term contracts for~~ the ~~purchase of certain raw materials. At June 28, 2003, the~~ Company’s ~~did~~$115 ~~not~~million ~~have~~of ~~any~~outstanding ~~long-term~~senior ~~purchase~~subordinated ~~commitments.~~notes ~~The~~(“Notes”) ~~Company~~and ~~intends~~interest toand ~~utilize~~principal ~~the~~payments ~~raw materials~~ under ~~its~~the ~~outstanding~~Revolving ~~purchase~~Financing ~~commitments~~Facility inrepresent ~~production.~~significant ~~The~~cash ~~Company~~requirements ~~leases buildings and equipment under various noncancellable lease agreements~~ for ~~periods of one to five years. The lease agreements generally require~~ the Company. toBorrowings ~~pay~~under ~~taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses related to~~ the ~~leased~~Revolving ~~assets.~~Financing ~~The~~Facility ~~Company~~bear ~~has~~interest ~~entered~~at ~~into employment agreements with certain key executives. Such agreements provide for~~floating ~~annual~~rates ~~salaries, bonuses~~ and ~~severances~~require ~~and~~interest ~~include~~payments ~~non-compete and non-solicitation provisions~~monthly. ~~The following table lists the Company’s commitments and contingencies at June 28, 2003 (dollars in thousands):~~

	Payments Due by Period
Contractural Obligations	Total		Less Than1 Year		1-3Years		3-5Years		More Than5 Years
Long-term debt obligations	$	193,252	$	8,578	$	69,674	$	115,000	$	—
Operating lease obligations		508		411		97		—		—
Purchase obligations		6,182		6,182		—		—		—
Total	$	199,942	$	15,171	$	69,771	$	115,000	$	—

The Company’s remaining liquidity needs are for capital expenditures and increases in working capital. The Company spent $0.8 million on capital projects in fiscal year 2004 to fund expenditures at existing facilities, and expects capital expenditures to be no more than $1.0 million at the existing facilities in the year ending July 2, 2005 (“fiscal year 2005”). The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations and available borrowings under the Revolving Financing Facility.

Net cash used in operating activities was $0.5 million in fiscal year 2004 and net cash from operating activities was $11.8 million in fiscal year 2003, a decrease of $12.3 million. This decrease is primarily due to the additional costs associated with the Non-Dairy Creamer Sale and the investment in the new product offering, premium dessert kits, as described above.

Cash from investing activities was $11.4 million in fiscal year 2004 and cash used in investing activities was less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2003. In fiscal year 2004, the Company received $12.2 million in proceeds from the Non-Dairy Creamer Sale.

Cash used in financing activities was $10.5 million and $11.1 million in fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2003, respectively, a decrease of $0.6 million. As described above, in fiscal year 2004, the Company received proceeds from the Revolving Financing Facility which were used to repay the outstanding amount of the then existing senior bank facilities and the financing costs associated with the refinancing. In addition, the Company used the proceeds from the sale of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business received in December 2003 to pay down its then existing term loan facility.

During the year ended July 3, 2004, the Company had negative cash generated from operating activities. The classification of the Revolving Financing Facility as a current liability caused a working capital deficit. The Revolving Financing Facility is available to the Company through March 23, 2007. The Company will be required to temporarily reduce the amount outstanding under the Revolver B by $20.3 million. Management has evaluated its estimated cash flows in the next operating period and believes that cash generated from operations and borrowings under the Revolving Financing Facility will be sufficient to service interest on the Notes and Revolving Financing Facility, satisfy working capital requirements, meet temporary requirements to reduce the amount of outstanding indebtedness, and make required capital expenditures in fiscal year 2005. However, significant changes in interest rates, the Company’s business, customers and cost of raw materials could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and the Company’s ability to meet its obligations.

As of September 9, 2004, GE Investment Private Placement Partners II, a Limited Partnership and Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P., Holdings’ principal stockholders, each owned $14.1 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes. These stockholders have guaranteed payment of Revolver B obligations and associated costs to the extent of interest paid to the stockholders on the Notes after March 23, 2004.

Significant Events in Fiscal Year 2004

On December 24, 2003, the Company sold to Dean Specialty Foods Group, LLC (“Dean Foods”) the Company’s business of marketing, distributing and selling powdered non-dairy creamer sold under the Cremora and Cremora Royale brand names (“Non-Dairy Creamer Business”) and related assets, including inventory (“Non-Dairy Creamer Sale”). The purchase price was $12.2 million. The Company recognized a loss of $1.0 million on the sale, which included the book values of $3.4 million, $6.3 million, $2.3 million, and $0.2 million for trade names, goodwill, inventory, and other prepaid assets, respectively. The Company incurred $1.0 million of expenses related to the Non-Dairy Creamer Sale.

Contractual Obligations

The Company may enter into long-term contracts for the purchase of certain raw materials. At July 3, 2004, the Company did not have any long-term purchase commitments. The Company intends to utilize the raw materials under its outstanding purchase commitments in production. The Company leases buildings and equipment under various noncancellable lease agreements for periods of one to five years. The lease agreements generally require the Company to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses related to the leased assets. The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain key executives. Such agreements provide for annual salaries, bonuses and severances and include non-compete and non-solicitation provisions. The following table lists the Company’s contractual obligations at July 3, 2004 (dollars in thousands):


	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
Long-term debt obligations	$	115,000	$	—	$	—	$	115,000	$	—
Revolving financing obligations		70,688		70,688		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations		822		244		487		51		40
Purchase obligations		7,271		7,271		—		—		—

Total	$	193,781	$	78,203	$	487	$	115,051	$	40

The Company’s Revolving Financing Facility includes a lockbox arrangement, which provides for all cash receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Financing Facility. This arrangement, combined with the existence of a subjective acceleration clause, causes the Revolving Financing Facility balance to be classified as a current liability on the balance sheet in accordance with EITF 95-22. The acceleration clause allows the Company’s lenders to accelerate payment of the obligation or to terminate the Financing Agreement upon the occurrence of an event or development that would be reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations, business, assets, properties or condition (financial or otherwise). Management believes that no such event or development has occurred. The maturity date of the Revolving Financing Facility is March 23, 2007.

Redeemable Preferred Stock

Redeemable Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at a price per share equal to the Stated Value for each series of Preferred Stock plus all dividends accrued and unpaid there upon (1) the closing of a public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, (2) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Holdings or the merger or consolidation of Holdings with or into any other corporation or other entity in which the holders of Holdings’ outstanding shares before the merger or consolidation do not retain a majority of the voting power of the surviving corporation or other entity or (3) the acquisition by any person of shares of Common Stock representing a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock then outstanding.

Seasonality

The Company’s net sales, operating income and cash flows are affected by a seasonal bias toward the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year due to increased sales during the holiday season. Three of the Company’s ~~five~~four major brands (Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk, Borden eggnog and None Such mincemeat pie filling) are ~~consumed primarily during the November and December holiday season. In recent years, approximately 48% of the Company’s net sales, excluding the ReaLemon and ReaLime brands’ net~~ sales, have occurred in the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. Because of this seasonality, the Company’s working capital needs have historically increased throughout the year, normally peaking in the August/September period, which requires the Company to draw additional amounts on its Revolving Credit Facility during this period.

~~Critical~~19 ~~Accounting Policies and Estimates~~

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires the use of significant judgment and estimates on the part of the Company’s management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to

consumed primarily during the ~~Financial~~November ~~Statements~~and ~~within~~December ~~this~~holiday ~~Annual~~season. ~~Report~~In onrecent ~~Form~~years, 10approximately 49% of the Company’s net sales, excluding the net sales of the Non-KDairy Creamer Business and the ReaLemon Business, have occurred in the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. ~~The~~Because ~~following~~of ~~discussion~~this ~~addresses~~seasonality, the Company’s ~~most~~working ~~critical~~capital ~~accounting~~needs ~~policies.~~have historically increased throughout the year, normally peaking in the August/September period, which will require the Company to draw additional amounts on its Revolving Financing Facility in that period.

~~Marketing~~Off-Balance ~~Costs.~~Sheet ~~The~~Arrangements Company offers market development funds, slotting, and other trade spending programs to its customers to support the customers’ promotional activities related to the Company’s product lines. The Company regularly reviews and revises estimates of costs to the Company, when deemed necessary, for the marketing programs based on actual costs incurred or revised spending level by the customers. Actual costs may differ significantly, as the performance from the marketing program may differ from previous expectations.

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of significant judgment and estimates on the part of the Company’s management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following discussion addresses the Company’s most critical accounting policies.

Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenues when there is persuasive evidence of a sale arrangement, delivery has occurred and title, ownership and risk of loss transfers to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Liabilities are established for estimated returns, allowances, consumer and certain trade promotions and discounts when revenues are recognized. The Company utilizes certain consumer and trade promotions, such as coupons, co-op advertising, featured price discounts and in store display incentives. These expenses are classified as a reduction of sales.

Marketing Costs. The Company offers market development funds, slotting, and other trade spending programs to its customers to support the customers’ promotional activities related to the Company’s product lines. The Company provides accruals for marketing costs based on historical information and known promotional programs that may deviate from prior years’ activity. At interim dates and year end, the Company reviews and revises estimates of costs to the Company, when deemed necessary, for the marketing programs based on actual costs incurred or revised spending level by the customers. Actual costs may differ significantly if factors, such as the level and success of the customers’ programs, changes in customer utilization practices, or other conditions, differ from previous expectations.

Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost of goods sold principally determined using the first-in, first-out method. The Company reviews the value of the inventory, and based on the physical condition (e.g., age and quality) of the inventories and forecasted sales plans, may require adjustments, either favorable or unfavorable. These inventory adjustments are estimates and may differ if future economic conditions, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company’s expectations.

Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Changes in circumstances, such as technological advances or changes to the Company’s capital strategy, can result in the actual lives differing from the Company’s estimates. The Company periodically reviews the useful lives of its property, plant and equipment, and where warranted, changes are made that may result in acceleration of depreciation.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill. Intangible assets are stated at fair value as recorded at acquisition and adjusted for impairment as deemed ~~appropriately~~appropriate. In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company reviews ~~goodwill and~~ indefinite-lived assets for impairment, at a minimum, annually or whenever events or changes in ~~circumstances~~ circumstances indicate that the carrying value of any such asset may not be recoverable. The Company performs its annual impairment test of intangible assets during its first quarter of the fiscal year. The fair value of the indefinite-lived tradenames are determined using a royalty savings methodology and discounted cash flows and the fair value of goodwill is determined using estimated future discounted cash flow earnings and market valuations based on these cash flow earnings.

Income taxes. Income taxes are recognized using the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing ~~assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which those~~ temporary differences are expected to reverse. The Company assesses the recoverability of the deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, the Company initially recorded a valuation allowance in fiscal year ended June 29, 2002 for the net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards. As of June 28, 2003, the valuation allowance was $53.3 million. The Company intends to maintain a full valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of the remaining reserve. Until such time, except for state and local tax expenses, the Company will have no reported tax provision, net of valuation allowance adjustments. In the event the Company were to determine, based on the existence of sufficient positive evidence, that it would be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.

Recently Adopted Accounting Statements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for intangible assets acquired individually or with a group of other assets at acquisition and for periods subsequent to acquisition. Effective June 30, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142. In accordance with this standard, goodwill and certain other intangible assets have been classified as indefinite-lived assets no longer subject to amortization. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to an impairment test upon adoption and at least annually thereafter. As of June 30, 2002, the value of the indefinite-lived tradenames was determined using a royalty savings methodology and discounted cash flows. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $43.7 million against tradenames. After completing the valuation and impairment of the tradenames, a market valuation of goodwill was assessed based on estimated cash flow earnings. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $12.9 million against goodwill. The transitional

impairment charge was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change. The Company’s annual amortization charge will be reduced by an estimated $4.5 million in fiscal year 2003. The useful lives of intangible assets still subject to amortization were not revised because of the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”). SFAS No. 144, which supersedes SFAS No. 121, applies to all long-lived assets (including discontinued operations) and consequently amends APB No. 30. SFAS No. 144 develops an accounting model (based on the model in SFAS No. 121) for disposal of long-lived assets. This model requires that long-lived assets that are to be disposed of be measured at the lower of book value or fair value, less cost to sell. Additionally, SFAS No. 144 expands the scope of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that (1) can be distinguished from the rest of the entity and (2) will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in a disposal transaction. SFAS No. 144 was effective for the Company’s first quarter of fiscal year 2003. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 (“SFAS No. 13”) and Technical Corrections” (“SFAS No. 145”) with an adoption date of fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. This pronouncement rescinds certain Statements and amends SFAS No. 13 and other various authoritative pronouncements to clarify, correct technically or describe applicability under changed conditions. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS No. 146”). SFAS No. 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Costs covered by SFAS No. 146 include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity that is initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company has adopted this pronouncement for activities after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34” (“FIN No. 45”). FIN No. 45 addresses the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees. This interpretation also clarifies the requirements related to the recognition of a liability by a guarantor at the inception of a guarantee for the obligations the guarantor has undertaken in issuing that guarantee. FIN No. 45 is effective for all guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements and the recognition provisions of FIN 45 in third quarter 2003. The adoption of this interpretation did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Recently Issued Accounting Statements

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN No. 46”). FIN No. 46 expands existing accounting guidance regarding when a variable interest entity is consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the variable interest entity’s residual returns or both. This pronouncement applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and to variable interest entities in which a company obtains an interest after that date. For variable interest entities created prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of this pronouncement are effective June 29, 2003. The adoption of FIN No. 46 is not expected to have any effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 149”). SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies the accounting guidance on derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) and hedging activities that fall

~~within~~assets ~~the~~and ~~scope~~liabilities ofand ~~SFAS~~their ~~No.~~respective ~~133,~~tax ~~“Accounting~~bases. ~~for~~Deferred ~~Derivative~~tax ~~Instruments~~assets and ~~Hedging~~liabilities ~~Activities”.~~are ~~SFAS~~measured ~~No.~~using ~~149~~enacted ~~also~~tax ~~amends~~rates ~~certain~~in ~~other~~effect ~~existing pronouncements,~~in the years in which ~~will~~those ~~result~~temporary indifferences ~~more~~are ~~consistent~~expected ~~reporting~~to ofreverse. ~~contracts~~The ~~that~~Company ~~are~~assesses ~~derivatives~~the inrecoverability ~~their~~of ~~entirety~~the deferred tax assets when events or circumstances indicate that ~~contain~~it ~~embedded~~is ~~derivatives~~more likely than not that ~~warrant~~the ~~separate~~assets ~~accounting.~~will ~~SFAS~~not Nobe recovered. ~~149~~The isCompany had ~~effective~~recorded a valuation allowance for ~~contracts~~the ~~entered~~net ~~into~~deferred ~~or modified~~tax ~~after~~assets and net operating loss carryforwards as of June 3029, ~~2003,~~2002. ~~with~~The ~~certain~~Company ~~exceptions,~~has continued to record a full valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was $54.2 million and ~~for~~$53.3 ~~hedging~~million as ~~relationships~~of ~~initiated~~July ~~after~~3, 2004 and June 3028, 2003, respectively. The ~~guidance~~Company ~~outlined~~intends into ~~this~~maintain ~~pronouncement~~a isfull valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to besupport ~~applied~~reversal ~~prospectively~~of the remaining reserve. Until such time, except for minor state and islocal ~~effective~~tax inexpenses, the ~~first~~Company ~~quarter~~will have no reported tax provision, net of valuation allowance adjustments. In the event the Company’s ~~fiscal~~were ~~year~~to ~~2004.~~determine, ~~The~~based ~~adoption~~on the existence of sufficient ~~this~~positive ~~pronouncement~~evidence, isthat ~~not~~it ~~expected~~would be able to ~~have~~realize ~~any~~deferred ~~effect~~tax onassets in the ~~Company’s~~future ~~results~~in excess of ~~operations~~the orcurrently ~~financial~~realized ~~condition.~~amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.

Recently Adopted Accounting Statements

In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN No. 46R”). FIN No. 46R varies significantly from FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN No. 46”), which it supersedes. FIN No. 46R requires the application of either FIN No. 46 or FIN No. 46R by “Public Entities” (as defined in paragraph 395 of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”) to all Special Purpose Entities (“SPEs”) created prior to February 1, 2003 at the end of the first interim or annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2003. All entities created after January 31, 2003 by Public Entities were already required to be analyzed under FIN No. 46, and they must continue to do so, unless FIN No. 46R is adopted early. FIN No. 46R is applicable to all non-SPEs created prior to February 1, 2003 by Public Entities at the end of the first interim or annual reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of this standard did not have any effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In July 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS No. 150”). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability, or as an asset in some circumstances. SFAS No. 150 applies to three types of freestanding financial instruments, other than outstanding shares. One type is mandatory redeemable shares, which the issuing company is obligated to buy back in exchange for cash or assets; a second type includes put options and forward purchase contracts that require or may require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets; the third type is obligations that can be settled with shares, the monetary value of which is fixed, ties solely or predominantly to a variable such as a market index, or varies inversely with the value of the issuers’ shares. SFAS No. 150 does not apply to features embedded in a financial instrument that is not a derivative in its entirety. The Company considered the classification of its redeemable preferred stock and determined that this stock is contingently redeemable. Accordingly, these securities are outside the scope of SFAS No. 150 and adoption of this standard did not have any effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106, and a revision of FASB Statement No. 132” (“SFAS No. 132”). SFAS No. 132 revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. It does not change the measurement or recognition of those plans required by FASB Statements No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits” and No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.” The new rules require additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. The required information has been provided separately for pension plans and for other postretirement benefit plans. This includes expanded disclosure on an interim basis as well. The new disclosures are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. The disclosures required by this statement have been included within the Notes to the Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This section may contain forward-looking statements which include assumptions about future market conditions, operations and financial results. These statements are based on current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties. They are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company’s actual results, performance or achievements in the future could differ significantly from the results, performance or achievements discussed or implied in such forward-looking statements herein and in prior Securities and Exchange Commission filings by the Company. The Company assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements or advise of changes in the assumption on which they were based.

Item 7A:

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rates

The following table presents a description of the financial instruments that were held by the Company at ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004 and that were sensitive to changes in interest rates. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative financial instrument transactions in order to manage or reduce market risk. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes. For the liabilities, the table represents principal fiscal year cash flows that exist by maturity date and the related average interest rate. The variable rates are estimated based upon the six-month forward LIBOR rate.

All amounts are reflected in U.S. dollars (in thousands).

	2004			2005				2006				2007			Thereafter				Total			Fair Value
	2005			2006			2007			2008				Total				Fair Value
Liabilities
Fixed Rate										$	115,000			$	$115,000	~~115,000~~		$	$80,500	~~115,000~~		$	~~78,200~~
Average Interest Rate											8.750	%			8.750	~~8.750~~%	%			~~8.750~~	%
Variable Rate	$	870,~~578~~688		$	~~50,956~~—		$	$—	~~18,718~~	$	—	$	—	$	$70,688	—		$	$70,688	~~78,252~~		$	~~78,252~~
Average Interest Rate		510.~~350~~336	%		~~5.314~~—	%		—	~~5.350~~	%	—		—		10.336	—%				~~5.327~~	%

As the table incorporates only those exposures that existed as of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004, it does not consider exposure to changes in the LIBOR rate that arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate interest expense with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the interest rates that are applicable during the period. A 1% change in interest rate will cause a variance of approximately $0.87 million in forecasted interest expense. The Company’s variable rate liability has a stated maturity date of March 23, 2007. In accordance with EITF 95-22, the Company has presented the outstanding balance as a current obligation. See additional disclosure in Note 7 of the financial statements of the Company included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Milk Hedging

The Company uses milk as a major ingredient in its sweetened condensed milk product line and is subject to the risk of rising milk prices that increase manufacturing costs and erode profit margins. By purchasing futures contracts, however, the Company establishes a known price for future milk purchases in order to protect against fluctuating milk prices. AsDuring ~~of June 28, 2003,~~ the ~~Company~~fourth ~~had purchased~~quarter ~~490~~of ~~milk~~fiscal ~~futures~~year ~~contracts, which will settle during various months through June~~ 2004, atthe aCompany ~~cost~~sold of886 ~~$11.5~~contracts ~~million~~for ~~and~~ a ~~current~~gain ~~market value~~ of $112.30 million, orprior anto ~~aggregate~~the ~~market~~contracts’ ~~loss~~settlement ~~of $0~~dates.2 ~~million.~~ The ~~aggregate~~gain ~~market value~~ will ~~increase~~ orbe ~~decrease~~recognized ~~based~~as on the ~~future~~original ~~milk~~contracts ~~prices~~mature. As

of July 3, 2004, the Company had purchased 154 milk futures contracts, which will settle during various months through May 2005, at a cost of $4.1 million and a current market value of $4.0 million, or an aggregate market loss of $0.1 million. The aggregate market value will increase or decrease based on the future milk prices.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Item 8:

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Item 15: “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.”

Item 9:

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A:

Controls and Procedures

(a)

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company’s management reviewed the Company’s internal controls and procedures and the effectiveness of these controls. As of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004, the registrants carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the registrants’ management, including the registrants’ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, including the event described below, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are not effective for the reason described in ~~timely~~Item ~~alerting~~9A(b) ~~them~~below. toDisclosure ~~material~~controls ~~information~~and ~~relating~~procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ~~the~~ensure ~~registrants~~that information required to be ~~included~~disclosed by an issuer in the ~~registrants~~reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s ~~periodic~~management, ~~SEC~~including ~~filings~~its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

22(b) Change in internal controls over financial reporting.

~~Table~~Subsequent to the issuance of ~~Contents~~the Company’s financial statements for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2004, the Company determined that borrowings under its Revolving Financing Facility should have been classified as short-term on the balance sheet of Eagle and the consolidated balance sheet of Holdings. As a

(b) Change in internal controls.

There was no change in the registrants’ internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, and therefore there were no corrective actions taken.

result, the balance sheet of Eagle at April 3, 2004 and the consolidated balance sheet of Holdings at April 3, 2004 were restated and a Form 10-Q/A was filed with the SEC on October 1, 2004 for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2004.

As of the end of the period covered by the Report on Form 10-K, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as described above.

In making this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer considered matters relating to this restatement and its impact on the financial statements taken as a whole, including the processes that were undertaken to ensure that all material adjustments necessary to correct the classification were recorded. This restatement reflected the Company’s compliance with an accounting standard that was brought to light with respect to the new Financing Agreement entered into on March 23, 2004. In light of the facts and circumstances relating to the restatement, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the restatement was reflective of a material weakness (as defined under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) in the Company’s disclosure controls.

The material weakness was caused by an inadequate control over the review process of new material debt agreements. The Company has subsequently implemented a more robust review policy of new material debt agreements using accounting checklists and additional levels of review.

Item 9B:

Other Information

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10:

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrants

The directors of Holdings and the Company and executive officers of ~~Holdings and~~ Eagle are as follows:

Name	Age	Position
Craig A. Steinke	4647	Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director*
Michael P. Conti	3435	Vice President, Finance*
Kelly J. Crouse	4041	Vice President, Marketing
Ronald E. Hord, Jr.	4142	Vice President, Supply Chain
Lori S. Snowden	4344	Secretary* and Financial Controller
Harold G. M. Strunk	4647	Vice President, Sales
David A. Barr	4041	Director
Andreas T. Hildebrand	3536	Director
Kewsong Lee	3839	Director
Mark J. Strelecki	3637	Director
Donald W. Torey	4647	Director

* Messrs. Steinke and Conti and Ms. Snowden hold these same positions at Holdings and are the executive officers of Holdings.

Craig A. Steinke has served as a Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Holdings and Eagle since July 2001. Since January 1998, Mr. Steinke has held the positions of Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of Holdings and Eagle. From March 1999 until July 2001, Mr. Steinke also served as Senior Vice President of Operations of Holdings and Eagle. Prior to joining Eagle, Mr. Steinke was President of Magma Metals, a billion dollar subsidiary of Magma Copper. He was responsible for operations, marketing and sales. Magma Metals was acquired by Broken Hill Proprietary Co. Ltd., and Mr. Steinke was promoted to Senior Vice President and Group General Manager of BHP Copper, a $3.0 billion subsidiary of Broken Hill Proprietary Co., Ltd. His responsibilities included worldwide sales, international and national marketing teams and a complex U.S. based manufacturing operation with over 1,000 employees.

Michael P. Conti has served as Vice President, Finance of Holdings and Eagle since August 2001. Mr. Conti joined Eagle in August 1998 and has held Director of Financial Planning and Analysis and Financial Manager positions. From April 1996 through August 1998, Mr. Conti served as Controller of Hamilton Watch, a division of The Swatch Watch Group.

Kelly J. Crouse has served as Vice President, Marketing of Eagle since August 2001. From 1998 through August 2001, Mr. Crouse served as Director of Customer Marketing and as Area Vice President of Sales at Eagle. Between 1994 and 1998, Mr. Crouse served as a National Trade Marketing Manager and Midwest Regional Sales Manager with BFC’s, Pasta/Sauce Division.

Ronald E. Hord, Jr. has served as Vice President, Supply Chain of Eagle since August 2001 as an executive officer. From March 2000 to August 2001, Mr. Hord served in that position in a non-executive officer capacity. Mr. Hord joined Eagle as the Director of Logistics in January 1998. From March 1994 through January 1998, Mr. Hord held a position in logistics with BFC and Borden, Inc., working on numerous food brands including the six brands that Eagle acquired.

Lori S. Snowden has served as Secretary of Holdings and Eagle since August 2001. Since April 1999, Ms. Snowden has served as Financial Controller for Eagle. Ms. Snowden joined Eagle as Assistant Controller in January 1998. ~~From~~Prior ~~1990~~ to ~~the~~joining ~~time she joined~~ Eagle, Ms. Snowden held various managerial accounting positions with BFC and Borden, Inc.

Harold G. M. Strunk has served as Vice President, Sales of Eagle since August 2001. From 1998 through August 2001 Mr. Strunk held positions of Director of Sales Support and Vice President of International Sales of

2425

Eagle. Between 1996 and 1998, Mr. Strunk held various managerial positions in sales and marketing with BFC and Borden, Inc.

David A. Barr has served as a Director of Holdings and Eagle since August 2001. Mr. Barr has served as a Member and Managing Director of E.M. Warburg, Pincus & Co., LLC (“EMW LLC”) and General Partner of Warburg, Pincus & Co. (“WP”) since January 1, 2001. Prior to joining EMW LLC, Mr. Barr was a Managing Director at Butler Capital Corp., a private investment firm focused on middle market management buyouts. His present service as a director includes membership on the boards of TransDigm Holding Company, ~~and~~Polypore Holdings, and Wellman, Inc.

Andreas T. Hildebrand has served as a Director of Holdings and Eagle since their respective dates of formation. Mr. Hildebrand has served as Managing Director of the Private Equity Group of General Electric Asset Management (“GEAM”) since July 2000 and Vice President of GEAM since May 1997. Mr. Hildebrand presently serves as a director of several privately held companies.

Kewsong Lee has served as a Director of Holdings and Eagle since their respective dates of formation. Mr. Lee has served as a Member and Managing Director of EMW LLC and General Partner of WP since January 1, 1997. His present service as a director includes membership on the boards of Knoll, Inc., Arch Capital Group Ltd., TransDigm Holding Company, Polypore Holdings, and several privately held companies.

Mark J. Strelecki has served as a Director of Holdings and Eagle since September 2002. Mr. Strelecki has served as an Associate in the Private Equity Group of GEAM since July 2000. From July 1997 through July 2000, Mr. Strelecki served in various Financial Planning and Analysis positions at GEAM.

Donald W. Torey has served as a Director of Holdings and Eagle since their respective dates of formation. Mr. Torey has served as Executive Vice President of GEAM and GE Investment Management Incorporated (“GEIM” and, together with GEAM, “GE Investments”) with responsibility for GE Investments’ ~~Private~~Alternative ~~Equity~~Assets ~~and~~group ~~Real Estate groups~~ since January 1997. Mr. Torey currently serves as a Trustee for the General Electric Pension Trust (“GEPT”).

25The Company does not have a separately designated audit committee and therefore the entire board acts as the audit committee for the Company. The board has determined not to designate an audit committee financial expert.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics, which is included as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 11:

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The following summary compensation table provides information concerning compensation for the Company’s chief executive ~~officers~~officer, the four other most highly compensated executive officers of Eagle and other executive officers who are named executive officers within the meaning of Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004, fiscal year ~~2002~~2003, and fiscal year ~~2001~~2002.

	Annual Compensation
Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)(1)		Other AnnualCompensation($)~~(2)~~
Craig A. Steinke Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer	2003 2002 2001	$	312,875 305,078 278,333	$	250,000 182,500 167,125	$	13,200 382,300 6,464	(3)
Craig A. Steinke	2004	$	320,970	$	300,000	$	680,700	(2)
Harold G.M. Strunk(4) Senior Vice President, Marketing and Sales	2003 2002		179,250 173,967		90,668 91,470		12,356 12,998	(5)
Chief Executive Officer, President	2003		312,875		250,000		13,200	(3)
Ronald E. Hord, Jr.(4) Vice President, Supply Chain	2003 2002		167,983 163,042		110,923 72,450		11,197 10,020	(5)
and Chief Financial Officer	2002		305,078		182,500		382,300	(4)
Kelly J. Crouse(4) Vice President, Marketing	2003 2002		167,783 162,842		80,837 66,980		12,696 38,337	(5,6)
Harold G.M. Strunk	2004		183,942		93,476		43,293	(2)
Michael P. Conti(4) Vice President, Finance	2003 2002		152,717 138,533		78,793 58,570		16,249 58,207	(6,7)
Senior Vice President, Marketing and Sales	2003		179,250		90,668		12,356	(3)
	2002		173,967		91,470		12,998	(5)
Ronald E. Hord, Jr.	2004		172,358		88,560		42,408	(2)
Vice President, Supply Chain	2003		167,983		110,923		11,197	(3)
	2002		163,042		72,450		10,020	(5)
Kelly J. Crouse	2004		172,158		88,475		43,287	(2)
Vice President, Marketing	2003		167,783		80,837		12,696	(3)
	2002		162,842		66,980		38,337	(5,6)
Michael P. Conti	2004		156,733		96,697		41,086	(2)
Vice President, Finance	2003		152,717		78,793		16,249	(3)
	2002		138,533		58,570		58,207	(6,7)

(1) The bonus represents the amount earned and paid to the Named Executive Officer for the Company’s fiscal year for which each executive could earn upa tocertain ~~100%~~percentage of his base salary if certain performance targets were met.

(2) Includes for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 for Messrs. Steinke, Strunk, Hord, Crouse and Conti, respectively, the following: (i) special bonus for consummating the Non-Dairy Creamer Sale of $667,000, $30,000, $30,000, $30,000, and $35,000 (ii) matching and profit sharing contributions (“~~company~~Company 401k match”) made by the Company on behalf of each Named Executive Officer pursuant to the Eagle 401k Savings and Retirement Plan of $6,~~000~~500, $56,~~156,~~093 $35,~~997~~208, $56,~~496~~087, and $56,~~433~~086; and (iiiii) car allowance of $7,200, $7,200, $7,200, $7,200, and $0~~; and (iii) moving expense of $10,816 for Mr~~. ~~Conti.~~

(3) Includes ~~$370,800~~for ~~special~~fiscal ~~bonus~~year 2003 for ~~consummating~~Messrs. ~~the~~Steinke, ~~ReaLemon~~Strunk, ~~Sale~~Hord, Crouse and Conti, respectively, the following: (i) Company 401k match of $6,000, ~~for~~$5,156, ~~out-of-town~~$3,997, $5,496, and $5,433; (ii) car allowance of $7,200, $7,200, $7,200, $7,200, and $50; and (iii) moving expense of $10,~~500~~816 for ~~company~~Mr. ~~401k match~~Conti.

(4) ~~Prior~~Includes ~~to fiscal year 2002~~$370,800 ~~these~~special ~~Named~~bonus ~~Executive~~for ~~Officers~~consummating ~~were~~the ~~employees~~ReaLemon ofSale, ~~Eagle~~$6,000 ~~but~~for ~~did~~out-of-town ~~not~~car ~~hold~~allowance ~~executive~~and ~~officer positions. Therefore~~$5,500 ~~their compensation is not provided~~ for ~~fiscal~~Company ~~year~~401k ~~2001~~match.

(5) Includes car allowance of $7,200, $6,000 and $7,200 and Company 401k match of $5,798, $4,020, and $5,717 for Messrs. Strunk, Hord, and Crouse, respectively.

⁽⁶⁾	Includes $25,420 and $31,778 related to moving expense for Messrs. Crouse and Conti, respectively.

⁽⁷⁾	Includes $20,000 special bonus for consummating the ReaLemon Sale.

Retirement Plan

The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan covering all eligible union employees. No executive officer participates in this plan.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Matters of compensation are reviewed and acted upon by the full Board of Directors, consisting of David A. Barr, Andreas T. Hildebrand, Kewsong Lee, Craig A. Steinke, Mark J. Strelecki, and Donald W. Torey. Mr. Steinke is an executive officer and employee of Holdings and Eagle. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Director Compensation

The Directors of Holdings and Eagle have not received, and are not expected in the future to receive, compensation for their service as directors. Directors are entitled to reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their travel to and attendance at meetings of the Boards of Directors or committees thereof, except that directors who are employees of Holdings, Eagle, or a stockholder of Holdings shall not be entitled to such reimbursement.

that directors who are employees of Holdings, Eagle, or a stockholder of Holdings shall not be entitled to such reimbursement.

Employment Agreements

On January 23, 1998, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Craig A. Steinke, pursuant to which Mr. Steinke served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company. In July 2001, Mr. Steinke was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. The Company has not entered into a new agreement with Mr. Steinke since his promotion. Pursuant to his employment agreement, his annual base salary was $300,000 as of July 1, 2001 and is subject to increases as determined by the Board of Directors. In addition, pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Steinke is entitled to receive a bonus of up to 100% of his base salary if certain performance targets are met. Bonuses for future periods are to be based on targets to be established by the Board of Directors. The agreement has a term of one year, with automatic annual renewals. In the event the employment agreement is terminated by the Company without “cause” (as defined in such employment agreement), Mr. Steinke is entitled to receive severance payments equal to the base salary then in effect for 12 months. The agreement provides for customary non-competition and non-solicitation provisions.

The Company ~~entered~~has ~~into~~ employment arrangements with Messrs. Conti, Crouse, Hord and Strunk relative to base pay and bonuses. In the event ~~the~~ employment ~~arrangement~~ is terminated by the Company without cause, these executive officers are entitled to receive severance payments equal to the base salary then in effect for 12 months.

2728

Item 12:

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

All of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Eagle as of October ~~September 22~~1, ~~2003~~2004 are beneficially owned by Holdings. There are three classes of capital stock of Holdings authorized and outstanding: the Common Stock, which has full voting rights, the Series A Preferred Stock and the Series B Preferred Stock, each of which has limited voting rights. The following table sets forth, as of ~~September~~ 22October 1, ~~2003~~2004, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, as determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with respect to (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of Holdings’ voting securities, (ii) each of the directors and named executive officers of Holdings and Eagle and (iii) all directors and executive officers of Holdings and Eagle, as a group:

	Common Stock		Series ~~APreferred~~A Preferred Stock		Series ~~BPreferred~~B Preferred Stock
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	~~Number~~Numberof ~~ofShares~~Shares	Percentage	Number ofShares	Percentage	Number ofShares	Percentage
GE Investment Private Placement Partners II, a Limited Partnership 3003 Summer Street Stamford, CT 06905(2)	458,200	4547.79	402,399	49.9	49.5	50.0
Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P. 466 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017(3)	458,200	4547.79	402,399	49.9	49.5	50.0
Craig A. Steinke(4)	40,835	4.12	990	*	—	—
Harold G.M. Strunk(5)	2,000	*	—	—	—	—
David A. Barr(3)	458,200	47.9	402,399	49.9	—	—
Ronald E. Hord, Jr.(5).	600	*	—	—	—	—
Andreas T. Hildebrand(2)(5)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Kelly J. Crouse(5)	750	*	—	—	—	—
Kewsong Lee(3)	458,200	47.9	402,399	49.9	—	—
Michael P. Conti(5)	1,000	*	—	—	—	—
Mark J. Strelecki(2)(5)	—	—	—	—	—	—
David A. Barr(3)	458,200	45.7	402,399	49.9	—	—
Donald W. Torey(2)(5)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Andreas T. Hildebrand(2)(6)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Michael P. Conti	—	—	—	—	—	—
Kewsong Lee(3)	458,200	45.7	402,399	49.9	—	—
Kelly J. Crouse	—	—	—	—	—	—
Mark J. Strelecki(2)(6)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Ronald E. Hord, Jr.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Donald W. Torey(2)(6)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Harold G.M. Strunk	—	—	—	—	—	—
All directors and executive officers as a Group (8 persons)(7)	503,685	50.3	403,389	50.0	49.5	50.0
All directors and executive officers as a Group (11 persons)(6)	499,035	52.1	403,389	50.0	49.5	50.0

*	Less than 1%

⁽¹⁾

Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, shares are deemed to be “beneficially owned” by a person if such person directly or indirectly has or shares (i) the power to vote or dispose of such shares, whether or not such person has any pecuniary interest in such shares, or (ii) the right to acquire the power to vote or dispose of such shares within 60 days, including any right to acquire through the exercise of any option, warrant or right. Unless otherwise indicated, each person’s address is c/o Eagle Family Foods, Inc. 735 Taylor Road, Gahanna, Ohio 43230. Messrs. Barr and Lee have the same address as Warburg. Messrs. Hildebrand, Strelecki, and Torey have the same address as GEI.

⁽²⁾

Does not include any shares indirectly held by Trustees of GEPT by virtue of GEPT’s limited partnership interest in Warburg. GEPT is also a limited partner in GEI. GEIM is the general partner of GEI and a wholly owned subsidiary of GE. As a result, each of GEIM and GE may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by GEI.

⁽³⁾

The sole general partner of Warburg is WP, a New York general partnership. EMW LLC, a New York limited liability company, manages Warburg. The members of EMW LLC are substantially the same as the partners of WP. Lionel I. Pincus is the managing partner of WP and the managing member of EMW LLC. WP, as the sole general partner of Warburg, has a 15% interest in the profits of Warburg. Messrs. Barr and Lee, directors of Holdings, are Managing Directors and members of EMW LLC and general partners of WP. As such, Messrs. Barr and Lee may be deemed to have an indirect pecuniary interest (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1 under the Exchange Act) in an indeterminate portion of the shares beneficially owned by Warburg and WP.

⁽⁴⁾	Includes 39,835 Restricted Shares, subject to certain vesting and forfeiture requirements, issued to Mr. Steinke.

(5) ~~Represents~~Excludes ~~Restricted~~458,200 ~~Shares~~shares of Common Stock, ~~subject~~402,399 toshares ~~certain~~of ~~vesting~~Series A Preferred Stock and ~~forfeiture~~49.5 ~~requirements~~shares of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owned by GEI and GEIM. As an executive officer and director of GEIM, ~~issued~~Mr. Torey has shared voting and investment power with respect to ~~named~~the ~~executive~~shares ~~officers~~held by GEI, and therefore, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares. Messrs. Hildebrand, Strelecki, and Torey disclaim beneficial ownership of all such shares owned by GEI and GEIM.

(6) ~~Excludes~~Includes 458,200 shares of Common Stock, 402,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 49.5 shares of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owned by ~~GEI and GEIM~~Warburg. AsExcludes ~~an executive officer and director of GEIM~~458,200 ~~Mr. Torey has shared voting and investment power with respect to the~~ shares ~~held~~of byCommon ~~GEI~~Stock, ~~and therefore~~402,399 ~~may~~shares ~~be deemed to be the beneficial owner~~ of ~~such~~Series ~~shares.~~A ~~Messrs.~~Preferred ~~Hildebrand,~~Stock ~~Strelecki,~~ and ~~Torey~~49.5 ~~disclaim~~shares ~~beneficial~~of ~~ownership~~Series ofB ~~all~~Preferred ~~such~~Stock ~~shares~~beneficially owned by GEI ~~and GEIM~~.

~~(7)~~29 Includes 458,200 shares of Common Stock, 402,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 49.5 shares of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owned by Warburg. Excludes 458,200 shares of Common Stock, 402,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 49.5 shares of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owned by GEI. Includes 300 shares of restricted stock, subject to certain vesting and forfeiture requirements, issued to executive officer not identified in the table.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information about the Common Stock issuable under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) as of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004. Only Restricted Shares had been issued under the Incentive Plan as of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004.

Plan category	Number of securities to beissued upon exercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights (a)	Weighted averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights(b)	Number of securitiesremaining ~~available~~availablefor ~~forfurther~~further issuance underequity compensation plans(excluding securitiesreflected in column (a)). (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	—	—	—
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)	—	—	~~121~~166,~~268~~315	(2)
Total	—	—	~~121~~166,~~268~~315

⁽¹⁾

On January 14, 1998, Holdings’ Board of Directors adopted the Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock to officers, key employees, directors and consultants of the Company at the discretion of a committee of the Holdings’ Board of Directors. Originally, there were 153,650 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan. As amended on January 5, 2000 by the Holdings’ Board of Directors, 206,150 shares of Common Stock may be awarded under the Incentive Plan, subject to certain adjustments reflecting changes in Holdings’ capitalization.

(2) All ~~121~~166,~~268~~315 shares of Common Stock remain available for issuance pursuant to the Incentive Plan. No options have been issued under the Incentive Plan.

The Holdings Stockholders Agreement

The relations among the Equity Sponsors and the Management Investors (collectively, the “Investors”), and Holdings are governed by a Stockholders Agreement, dated as of the Acquisition Closing and as amended (the “Holdings Stockholders Agreement”). The following summary of certain provisions of the Holdings Stockholders Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all the provisions of the Holdings Stockholders Agreement.

Board of Directors. Holdings is managed by a Board of Directors not to exceed nine members, three members of which may be designated by GEI and three members of which may be designated by Warburg. For so long as GEI beneficially owns at least 20% of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis, GEI has the right to designate three directors to the Board of Directors. For so long as GEI beneficially owns at least 15% of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis, GEI has the right to designate two directors to the Board of Directors. For so long as GEI beneficially owns at least 10% of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis, GEI has the right to designate one director to the Board of Directors. For so long as Warburg beneficially owns at least 20% of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis, Warburg has the right to designate three directors to the Board of Directors. For so long as Warburg beneficially owns at least 15% of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis, Warburg has the right to designate two directors to the Board of Directors. For so long as Warburg beneficially owns at least 10% of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis, Warburg has the right to designate one director to the Board of Directors. In addition, as long as the Equity Sponsors in the aggregate beneficially own more than 50% of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis, the Equity Sponsors have the right to designate a majority of the directors to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will have at least one director who is not an officer or employee of Holdings, the Company, or the Equity Sponsors, appointed by unanimous approval of the Board of Directors. The Holdings Stockholders Agreement provides that the Board of Directors of the Company is identical to that of Holdings.

The consent of a majority of the Board of Directors which includes at least one of the directors designated by GEI and one of the directors designated by Warburg is required for the approval of (i) the Company’s or Holdings’ annual operating budget; (ii) capital expenditures or investments not approved in the annual budget in amounts greater than $500,000; (iii) any merger or consolidation involving the Company or Holdings; (iv) any acquisition by the Company or Holdings of any assets or stock, other than acquisitions of assets in the ordinary course of business; (v) any divestiture of assets in excess of $500,000 by the Company or Holdings, other than sales of inventory in the

2930

ordinary course of business; (vi) any liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or any consent to a bankruptcy or insolvency or related proceeding involving, the Company or Holdings; (vii) the issuance or sale of any debt or equity securities for cash; (viii) any expansion into new lines of business; (ix) any joint venture or strategic alliance; (x) the repurchase or redemption of any outstanding shares of capital stock or the declaration or payment of any dividends on any shares of capital stock of the Company or Holdings; (xi) the amendment or modification of the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of the Company or Holdings; (xii) the amendment, modification or termination of any employment agreement with any executive officer of the Company or Holdings; (xiii) the grant of any stock options or other equity-based compensation; (xiv) the hiring or firing of any executive officer; (xv) any related party transactions; (xvi) any loans or guarantees by the Company or Holdings outside of the ordinary course of business; (xvii) any agreement having a duration in excess of one year or cumulative obligations in excess of $1 million; (xviii) the amendment, modification or termination of any agreement with any union; (xix) the approval or adoption, amendment, modification or termination of certain employee benefit plans; and (xx) any agreement to do any of the foregoing.

Restrictions on Transfer of Stock. Securities held by the Management Investors, including any shares of Common Stock or Redeemable Preferred Stock and any options to acquire shares of Common Stock, may only be sold or otherwise transferred with the consent of the Board of Directors of Holdings.

Tag-Along Rights. The Holdings Stockholders Agreement provides that in the event any Investor chooses to sell or otherwise transfer more than 20% of its shares of Common Stock or Redeemable Preferred Stock to a proposed transferee, the selling Investor must offer to each of the other Investors the right to participate in such sale on a pro rata basis based on ownership of the shares being sold.

Subscription Rights. With certain exceptions, the Holdings Stockholders Agreement provides each Investor with subscription rights in connection with any issuance of equity securities by Holdings for cash whereby each Investor shall have the right to purchase a pro rata portion of such equity securities.

Certain Covenants. The Holdings Stockholders Agreement requires Holdings to (i) provide certain financial and other information to the Investors concerning Holdings and its subsidiaries (ii) comply with applicable law and (iii) maintain insurance.

Termination. The tag-along rights and subscription rights described above will terminate upon the completion of an initial public offering of Common Stock.

The Registration Rights Agreement

Holdings and the Investors entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of the Acquisition Closing and as amended (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, each of the Equity Sponsors has two demand registration rights for each of its Redeemable Preferred Stock and Common Stock. In addition, the Equity Sponsors have unlimited Form S-3 registration rights and unlimited piggyback rights. The Management Investors also have piggyback registration rights. All expenses related to these registrations (other than underwriting discounts and commissions) will be borne by Holdings. Holdings is required to use its best efforts to affect such registrations, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Holdings has agreed to indemnify the Investors for certain liabilities arising out of such registrations, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

Item 13:

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

InOn ~~connection~~September ~~with~~27, ~~the~~1999, ~~portion~~pursuant ~~of the Equity Contribution~~ to ~~Holdings~~a ~~made~~subscription ~~by Mr. Nugent~~agreement, ~~the~~each ~~Company lent an aggregate~~ of ~~$250,000~~Warburg toand ~~Mr.~~GEI ~~Nugent~~purchased ~~in exchange~~(i) ~~for full recourse note bearing interest at a floating rate~~50,000 ~~set~~shares ~~semi-annually,~~of atCommon ~~The~~Stock ~~Chase~~and ~~Manhattan~~Warrants ~~Bank’s~~to ~~then applicable prime rate~~purchase 11, ~~in effect for six-month periods, plus 0~~006.5%. ~~The~~shares ~~note would have matured on the fifth anniversary~~ of ~~the~~Common ~~Acquisition~~Stock ~~Closing~~for ~~and was secured by~~ a ~~pledge~~cash inpurchase ~~favor~~price of ~~the~~$50,000 ~~Company~~and of(ii) ~~all~~49.5 ~~of the~~ shares of ~~Common Stock and~~ Series AB Preferred Stock ~~owned~~for bya ~~such~~cash ~~Management~~purchase ~~Investor.~~price ~~Pursuant~~of ~~to the Separation Agreement~~$4, Mr950,000. ~~Nugent~~The ~~agreed~~Warrants towere ~~transfer 2,475~~exercisable ~~shares~~(a) offor ~~Series~~a Apurchase ~~Preferred~~price ~~Stock~~of to$1 ~~the~~per ~~Company~~share ~~and~~of toCommon ~~waive~~Stock (subject ~~his right~~ to ~~payment~~certain ~~therefore~~adjustments) inand ~~accordance~~(b) ~~with~~only upon the ~~terms~~failure of ~~his~~the ~~employment~~Company ~~agreement,~~to asachieve ~~payment~~certain infinancial ~~full~~targets ~~and~~for ~~complete~~fiscal ~~satisfaction~~year of2000. ~~principal~~The ~~and~~financial ~~interest~~targets ~~accrued~~for onfiscal ~~this~~year ~~note and~~2000 ~~2,475~~were ~~shares~~not ofmet. ~~Series~~The AWarrants ~~Preferred~~expired ~~Stock~~on ~~for~~September a27, ~~cash~~2004 ~~purchase~~without being ~~price of $250,000~~exercised.

3031

On September 27, 1999, pursuant to a subscription agreement, each of Warburg and GEI purchased (i) 50,000 shares of Common Stock and Warrants to purchase 11,006.5 shares of Common Stock for a cash purchase price of $50,000 and (ii) 49.5 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for a cash purchase price of $4,950,000. The Warrants may be exercised (a) for a purchase price of $1 per share of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) and (b) only upon the failure of the Company to achieve certain financial targets for fiscal year 2000. The financial targets for fiscal year 2000 were not met. Therefore, the Warrants are exercisable. The Warrants expire on September 27, 2004.

Matters of compensation are reviewed and acted upon by the full Board of Directors, consisting of David A. Barr, Andreas T. Hildebrand, Kewsong Lee, Craig A. Steinke, Mark J. Strelecki and Donald W. Torey. Mr. Steinke is an executive officer and employee of Holdings and Eagle.

All future transactions between the Company and its officers, directors, principal stockholders or their respective affiliates, will be on terms no less favorable to the Company than can be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Item 14:

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the fees billed to ~~Eagle~~the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 and ~~2002~~2003 (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year2003		Fiscal Year2002
	Fiscal Year2004		Fiscal Year2003
Audit Fees	$	~~158~~167.48	$	~~145~~158.54
Audit-Related Fees		18190.85		2318.8
Tax Fees and Other Fees		4074.5		4540.15
Total	$	~~217~~432.78	$	~~214~~217.47

Audit Fees for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 and fiscal year ~~2002~~2003 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, the issuance of debt compliance letters and assistance with the review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audited -Related Fees for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 ~~and~~were for due diligence work pertaining to an acquisition attempt. For fiscal year ~~2002~~2003, fees were for ~~audit or compilation~~ work pertaining to the Company’s employee benefit plans.

Tax Fees and Other Fees for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 and fiscal year ~~2002~~2003 were for services related to tax compliance and preparation of federal, state and local corporate tax returns and personal property returns and tax planning and tax advice. ~~Tax~~Fiscal ~~fees for fiscal~~ year ~~2002~~2004 also included fees for services ~~relative~~related to ~~tax~~an ~~consultation~~acquisition ~~on the ReaLemon Sale~~attempt.

The ~~officers~~Company ofdoes ~~the~~not ~~Company~~have ~~consult~~an ~~with~~audit committee and therefore the entire board is consulted before ~~engaging~~ accountants are engaged for any services.

3132

PART IV

Item 15: Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules~~, and Reports on Form 8-K~~

(a)(1) Financial Statements of the Company

		Page
Eagle Family Foods, Inc. and Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.
Report of Independent Accountants		36
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		37
Eagle Family Foods, Inc. Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002, and June 30, 2001		37
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fifty-Three Week Period ended July 3, 2004 and the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002		38
Eagle Family Foods, Inc. Balance Sheets as of June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2002		38
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 3, 2004 and June 28, 2003		39
Eagle Family Foods, Inc. Statements of Cash Flows for the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002, and June 30, 2001		39
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fifty-Three Week Period ended July 3, 2004 and the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002		40
Eagle Family Foods, Inc. Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002, and June 30, 2001		40
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Fifty-Three Week Period ended July 3, 2004 and the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002		41
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002, and June 30, 2001		41
Notes to the Financial Statements		42
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002		42
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002, and June 30, 2001		43
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		56
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Fifty-Two Week Periods ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002, and June 30, 2001		44
All other schedules are omitted because the required information is presented either in the financial statements or notes thereto, or is not applicable, required or material.
Notes to the Financial Statements		45

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules are omitted because the required information is either presented in the financial statements or notes thereto, or is not applicable, required or material.

(a)(3) Exhibits

2.1		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 24, 1997, as amended as of December 9, 1997 and January 15, 1998, by and among Borden Foods Corporation, BFC Investments, L.P., and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Eagle and Holdings filed on June 17, 1998 (the “S-4”))
2.2		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2001, among Holdings, Eagle, Mott’s Inc. and Cadbury Beverages Delaware, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Report on Form 8-K filed by Holdings and Eagle on October 3, 2001)
3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Holdings (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the S-4)
3.2		Amended Bylaws of Holdings (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on May 14, 1999)
3.3		Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated November 19, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the S-4)
3.4		Amended Bylaws of Eagle (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on May 14, 1999)

3.3		Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated November 19, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the S-4)
3.4		Amended Bylaws of Eagle (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on May 14, 1999)
3.5		Certificate of Designation, Number, Voting Powers, Preferences and Rights of Series B Non-Voting Preferred Stock of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. dated September 24, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on October 27, 1999)
4.1		Credit Agreement, dated January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings, Eagle, The Chase Manhattan Bank, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, Chase Securities, Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated August 12, 1998, as amended by Amendment No. 2, dated November 30, 1998, as amended by Amendment No. 3, dated June 30, 1999, as amended by Amendment No. 4 dated June 29, 2000, as amended by Amendment No. 5 dated January 26, 2001, as amended by Amendment No. 6 dated August 10, 2001, and as amended by Amendment No. 7 dated November 21, 2002.
4.2		Purchase Agreement, dated January 16, 1998, by and among Holdings, Eagle, Chase Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the S-4)
4.3		Indenture, dated January 23, 1998, among Holdings, Eagle and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company (including Specimen Certificates of 8¾% Series Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 and 8¾% Series B Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the S-4)
4.4		Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings, Eagle, Chase Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the S-4)
4.5		Stockholders Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings and certain stockholders of Holdings named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the S-4)
4.6		Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings and certain stockholders of Holdings named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the S-4)
4.7		Subscription Rights Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings, GEI and Warburg (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the S-4)
4.8		First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 27, 1999, by and among Holdings and certain investors named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the 10-Q, filed on October 27, 1999)
4.9		First Amendment to Stockholders Agreement, dated September 27, 1999, by and among Holdings and certain stockholders of Holdings named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on October 27, 1999)
4.10		Subscription Agreement, dated September 27, 1999, by and among Holdings, GE Investment Private Placement Partners, II, a Limited Partnership and Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L. P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on October 27, 1999)
10.1		License Agreement dated January 23, 1998 by and among BDH Two, Inc., Borden, Inc. and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the S-4)
10.2		Assignment of Trademark License Agreement dated January 23, 1998, by and between BFC and the Company of BFC’s License Agreement, dated as of September 4, 1997, by and between BFC and Southern Foods Group, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the S-4)

3.5		Certificate of Designation, Number, Voting Powers, Preferences and Rights of Series B Non-Voting Preferred Stock of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. dated September 24, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on October 27, 1999)
4.1		Financing Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2004, by and among Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc., Eagle Family Foods, Inc., the financial institutions from time to time party there to, Fortress Credit Opportunities, ILP, as collateral agent for the Lenders, and Congress Financial Corporation (Central), as administrative agent for the Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Report on Form 8-K filed by Holdings and Eagle on March 25, 2004)
4.2		First Amendment to Financing Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2004, by and among Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc., as guarantor, Eagle Family Foods, Inc., as borrower, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto, as lenders, Fortress Credit Opportunities I LP, as collateral agent, and Congress Financial Corporation (Central), as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Report on Form 8-K filed by Holdings and Eagle on September 22, 2004)
4.3		Purchase Agreement, dated January 16, 1998, by and among Holdings, Eagle, Chase Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the S-4)
4.4		Indenture, dated January 23, 1998, among Holdings, Eagle and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company (including Specimen Certificates of 8¾% Series Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 and 8¾% Series B Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the S-4)
4.5		Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings, Eagle, Chase Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the S-4)
4.6		Stockholders Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings and certain stockholders of Holdings named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the S-4)
4.7		Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings and certain stockholders of Holdings named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the S-4)
4.8		Subscription Rights Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings, GEI and Warburg (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the S-4)
4.9		First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 27, 1999, by and among Holdings and certain investors named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the 10-Q, filed on October 27, 1999)
4.10		First Amendment to Stockholders Agreement, dated September 27, 1999, by and among Holdings and certain stockholders of Holdings named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on October 27, 1999)
4.11		Subscription Agreement, dated September 27, 1999, by and among Holdings, GE Investment Private Placement Partners, II, a Limited Partnership and Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L. P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on October 27, 1999)
10.1		License Agreement dated January 23, 1998 by and among BDH Two, Inc., Borden, Inc. and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the S-4)
10.2		Assignment of Trademark License Agreement dated January 23, 1998, by and between BFC and the Company of BFC’s License Agreement, dated as of September 4, 1997, by and between BFC and Southern Foods Group, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the S-4)
10.3		License Agreement, dated January 23, 1998, by and between BFC and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the S-4)
10.4		The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan of Holdings (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the S-4)
10.5		Employment Agreement, dated January 23, 1998, by and between Craig A. Steinke and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the S-4)
10.6		Amendment No. 1 to the Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, effective January 5, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on May 10, 2000)
12.1		Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
12.2		Eagle Family Foods, Inc. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.1		Certification, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Eagle Family Foods, Inc.
31.2		Certification, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

None.


10.4		The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan of Holdings (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the S-4)

10.5		Employment Agreement, dated January 23, 1998, by and between Craig A. Steinke and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the S-4)

10.6		Amendment No. 1 to the Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, effective January 5, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Report on Form 10-Q, filed by Holdings and Eagle on May 10, 2000)

12.1		Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

14.1		Code of Ethics for Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. and Eagle Family Foods, Inc.

31.1		Certification, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Eagle Family Foods, Inc.

31.2		Certification, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC. By: /S/ CRAIG A. STEINKE Craig A. ~~SteinkePresident~~Steinke President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief ~~FinancialOfficer~~Financial Officer EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC. By: /S/ CRAIG A. STEINKE Craig A. Steinke President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

~~EAGLE~~October ~~FAMILY FOODS~~1, ~~INC.~~2004 ~~By: /s/ CRAIG A. STEINKE Craig A. SteinkePresident, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer~~

September 22, 2003

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrants and in their capacities indicated.

Name	Title	Date
/S/ CRAIG A. STEINKE Craig A. Steinke	Director, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)	~~September~~October 221, ~~2003~~2004
/S/ ANDREAS T. HILDEBRAND Andreas T. Hildebrand	Director	~~September~~October 221, ~~2003~~2004
/S/ KEWSONG LEE Kewsong Lee	Director	~~September~~October 221, ~~2003~~2004
/S/ DAVID A. BARR David A. Barr	Director	~~September~~October 221, ~~2003~~2004
/S/ DONALD W. TOREY Donald W. Torey	Director	~~September~~October 221, ~~2003~~2004
/S/ MARK J. STRELECKI Mark J. Strelecki	Director	~~September~~October 221, ~~2003~~2004

3536

Report of Independent ~~Auditors~~Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and ~~Shareholders~~Stockholders

of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.

and ~~Eagle~~its ~~Family Foods Holdings, Inc.~~subsidiary:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. and its ~~Eagle~~subsidiary ~~Family~~at ~~Foods~~July ~~Holdings~~3, ~~Inc.~~2004 atand June 28, 2003 ~~and June 29~~, ~~2002,~~ and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) (2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management;. ~~our~~Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with ~~auditing~~the standards ~~generally~~of ~~accepted~~the inPublic ~~the~~Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). ofThose ~~America,~~standards ~~which~~ require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 6 to the financial statements, effective June 30, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Columbus, Ohio

~~August~~September 2821, ~~2003~~2004

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Fifty-Two Week Period Ended
	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002			June 30, 2001
Net sales, before marketing allowance	$	157,647		$	171,431		$	220,633
Marketing allowance		28,925			27,582			35,063
Net sales		128,722			143,849			185,570
Cost of goods sold		81,313			90,147			102,650
Cost of goods sold, accelerated depreciation		—			11,126			—
Cost of goods sold		81,313			101,273			102,650
Gross margin		47,409			42,576			82,920
Distribution expense		8,292			9,004			12,851
Marketing expense		11,158			12,335			20,284
General and administrative expense		7,619			8,824			13,363
Amortization of intangible assets		1,660			8,052			11,157
Gain (loss) on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges and other charges		(1,190	)		18,722			—
Operating income		17,490			23,083			25,265
Interest expense, net		15,558			20,691			33,200
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		1,932			2,392			(7,935	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		76			(34,101	)		2,862
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change		2,008			(31,709	)		(5,073	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of tax $0 and $212)		56,614			—			(361	)
Net loss	$	(54,606	)	$	(31,709	)	$	(5,434	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Cash flow hedges -
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of tax of $741)		—			—			1,262
Change in fair value of financial derivatives (net of tax benefit of $568)		—			—			(967	)
Change in fair value of commodity contracts (net of tax benefit of $0 and $24)		37			(41	)		—
Reclassification to interest expense (net of tax benefit of $71, $124, and $127)		(121	)		(211	)		(215	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		206			107			(55	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(54,484	)	$	(31,854	)	$	(5,409	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

Balance Sheets

(Dollars in Thousands Except Share Data)

	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,616		$	892
Accounts receivable, net		7,261			9,379
Inventories		32,594			35,491
Other current assets		1,222			605
Total current assets		42,693			46,367
Property and equipment, net		5,574			8,670
Intangible assets, net		104,571			162,837
Other non-current assets		4,274			5,168
Intercompany receivable		1,382			1,382
Total assets	$	158,494		$	224,424
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	8,578		$	936
Accounts payable		5,504			5,825
Other accrued liabilities		6,111			7,031
Accrued interest		5,402			5,071
Total current liabilities		25,595			18,863
Long-term debt		184,674			202,852
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Stockholder’s equity
Common stock, $.01 par value, 250,000 shares authorized, 10,000 shares issued and outstanding		1			1
Additional paid-in capital		92,500			92,500
Accumulated deficit		(144,288	)		(89,682	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		12			(110	)
Total stockholder’s equity		(51,775	)		2,709
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	158,494		$	224,424

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Fifty-Two Week Period Ended
	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002			June 30, 2001
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities:
Net loss	$	(54,606	)	$	(31,709	)	$	(5,434	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		5,322			25,549			17,434
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,450			2,878			2,322
Cumulative effect of accounting change		56,614			—			361
Loss (gain) on retirement/sale of fixed assets		(549	)		(5	)		32
Deferred taxes		—			33,889			(3,094	)
Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges		—			(18,722	)		—
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		2,118			4,955			(462	)
Inventories		2,897			(1,542	)		(2,541	)
Accounts payable		(321	)		(1,196	)		(4,942	)
Other assets		(617	)		(250	)		(825	)
Other liabilities		(468	)		(11,768	)		(4,677	)
Cash from (used in) operating activities		11,840			2,079			(1,826	)
Cash (used in) from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(610	)		(414	)		(3,568	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets		593			41			—
Proceeds from sale of product lines		—			128,425			—
Cash (used in) from investing activities		(17	)		128,052			(3,568	)
Cash (used in) from financing activities:
Borrowings under revolving credit facility		55,000			64,100			78,900
Payments under revolving credit facility		(64,600	)		(75,500	)		(71,900	)
Payments under term loan facility		(936	)		(118,312	)		(1,000	)
Other financing costs		(563	)		(591	)		(1,612	)
Proceeds from sale of interest rate swap agreements		—			—			873
Cash (used in) from financing activities		(11,099	)		(130,303	)		5,261
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		724			(172	)		(133	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		892			1,064			1,197
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,616		$	892		$	1,064
Supplemental disclosure:
Interest paid	$	14,074		$	21,528		$	31,863

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity

For the Fifty-Two Week Periods Ended

June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002, and June 30, 2001

(Dollars in Thousands)

	CommonStock		AdditionalPaid inCapital		AccumulatedDeficit			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss)			Total
Balance, July 1, 2000	$	1	$	92,500	$	(52,539	)	$	10		$	39,972
Net loss		—		—		(5,434	)		—			(5,434	)
Other comprehensive income:
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—		—		—			1,262			1,262
Change in fair value of financial derivatives		—		—		—			(967	)		(967	)
Reclassification to interest expense		—		—		—			(215	)		(215	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			(55	)		(55	)
Balance, June 30, 2001		1		92,500		(57,973	)		35			34,563
Net loss		—		—		(31,709	)		—			(31,709	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Change in fair value of commodities		—		—		—			(41	)		(41	)
Recognition of interest income		—		—		—			(211	)		(211	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			107			107
Balance, June 29, 2002		1		92,500		(89,682	)		(110	)		2,709
Net loss		—		—		(54,606	)		—			(54,606	)
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of commodities		—		—		—			37			37
Reclassification to interest expense		—		—		—			(121	)		(121	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			206			206
Balance, June 28, 2003	$	1	$	92,500	$	(144,288	)	$	12		$	(51,775	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations ~~and Comprehensive Loss~~

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Fifty-Two Week Period Ended
	Fifty-Three WeekPeriod Ended July 3, 2004			Fifty-Two Week PeriodEnded
	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002			June 30, 2001
				June 28,2003			June 29,2002
Net sales, before marketing allowance	$	~~157~~139,~~647~~973		$	~~171~~128,~~431~~661		$	~~220~~138,~~633~~003
Marketing allowance		2824,~~925~~195			2723,~~582~~000			3521,~~063~~652
Net sales		~~128~~115,~~722~~778			~~143~~105,~~849~~661			~~185~~116,~~570~~351
Cost of goods sold		8172,~~313~~789			9064,~~147~~150			~~102~~68,~~650~~431
Cost of goods sold, accelerated depreciation		—			~~11,126~~—			—11,126
Cost of goods sold		8172,~~313~~789			~~101~~64,~~273~~150			~~102~~79,~~650~~557
Gross margin		4742,~~409~~989			4241,~~576~~511			8236,~~920~~794
Distribution expense		87,~~292~~578			96,~~004~~405			126,~~851~~986
Marketing expense		11,~~158~~351			129,~~335~~132			2010,~~284~~002
General and administrative expense		7,~~619~~170			87,~~794~~619			138,~~372~~794
Amortization of intangible assets		1,660			8,052			11,157
Due diligence and other costs		1,516			—			—
Gain (loss) on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges and other charges		(1,190	)		18,722			—
Amortization of intangible assets		—			1,660			8,052
Operating income		17,490			23,113			25,256
Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges		—			—			18,722
Interest expense, net		15,558			20,691			33,200
Operating income (loss)		15,374			16,695			21,682
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		1,932			2,422			(7,944	)
Interest expense, net		15,994			14,899			19,921
Income tax benefit (expense)		76			(34,101	)		2,862
Costs related to refinancing		1,310			—			—
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change		2,008			(31,679	)		(5,082	)
Income (loss) before income taxes, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of accounting change		(1,930	)		1,796			1,761
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of tax of $0 and $212 )		56,614			—			(361	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(73	)		76			(34,101	)
Net loss	$	(54,606	)	$	(31,679	)	$	(5,443	)
Income (loss) before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of accounting change		(2,003	)		1,872			(32,340	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Income from discontinued operations		607			136			661
Cash flow hedges -
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations		(1,007	)		—			—
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of tax of $741)		—			—			1,262
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(400	)		136			661
Change in fair value of financial derivatives (net of tax benefit of $568)		—			—			(967	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—			56,614			—
Change in fair value of commodity contracts (net of tax benefit of $0 and $24)		37			(41	)		—
Net loss	$	(2,403	)	$	(54,606	)	$	(31,679	)
Reclassification to interest expense (net of tax benefit of $71, $124, and $127)		(121	)		(211	)		(215	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		206			107			(55	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(54,484	)	$	(31,824	)	$	(5,418	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4138

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in Thousands Except Share Data)

	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002
	July 3,2004			June 28,2003
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,~~616~~030		$	~~892~~1,616
Accounts receivable, net		78,~~261~~075			97,~~379~~261
Inventories		3233,~~594~~298			3532,~~491~~594
Other current assets		1,~~222~~634			~~605~~1,222
Total current assets		4245,~~693~~037			4642,~~367~~693
Property and equipment, net		53,~~574~~960			85,~~670~~574
Intangible assets, net		104,571			162,837
Goodwill		61,047			67,354
Other non-current assets		4,274			5,168
Other intangible assets		33,783			37,217
Total assets	$	157,112		$	223,042
Other non-current assets		4,547			4,274
Total assets	$	148,374		$	157,112
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	~~8,578~~—		$	~~936~~8,578
Accounts payable		5,504			5,825
Revolving financing facility		70,688			—
Other accrued liabilities		6,111			7,031
Accounts payable		7,093			5,504
Accrued interest		5,402			5,071
Other accrued liabilities		5,904			6,111
Total current liabilities		25,595			18,863
Accrued interest		4,907			5,402
Long-term debt		184,674			202,852
Total current liabilities		88,592			25,595
Long-term debt		115,000			184,674
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Redeemable preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A preferred stock, $100 stated value, 816,750 shares issued and outstanding at redemption value		~~138~~152,~~247~~518			~~125~~138,~~555~~247
Treasury stock, 10,962 shares at cost		(1,382	)		(1,382	)
		136,865			124,173
		151,136			136,865
Series B preferred stock, $100,000 stated value, 99 shares issued and outstanding at redemption value		1415,~~280~~769			1214,~~956~~280
Total redeemable preferred stock		~~151~~166,~~145~~905			~~137~~151,~~129~~145
Stockholders’ deficit
Common stock $0.01 par value, 1,200,000 shares authorized, 1,002,582 and 1,116,704 issued and outstanding, respectively		10			10
Common stock $0.01 par value, 1,200,000 shares authorized, 957,235 shares issued and outstanding		10			10
Additional paid-in capital		958			958
Accumulated deficit		(~~205~~223,~~282~~445	)		(~~136~~205,~~660~~282	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		12			(110	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		354			12
Total stockholders’ deficit		(~~204~~222,~~302~~123	)		(~~135~~204,~~802~~302	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	~~157~~148,~~112~~374		$	~~223~~157,~~042~~112

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4239

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Fifty-Two Week Period Ended
	Fifty-Three WeekPeriod Ended July 3, 2004			Fifty-Two Week PeriodEnded
	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002			June 30, 2001
				June 28,2003			June 29,2002
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities:
Cash flows (used in) from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(542,~~606~~403	)	$	(3154,~~679~~606	)	$	(531,~~443~~679	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from (used in) operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) from operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		52,~~322~~398			255,~~519~~322			1725,~~443~~519
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,~~450~~449			21,~~878~~450			2,~~322~~878
Cumulative effect of accounting change		~~56,614~~—			—56,614			~~361~~—
Loss (gain) on retirement/sale of fixed assets		(549	)		(5	)		32
Write off of deferred financing costs		1,273			—			—
Deferred taxes		—			33,889			(3,094	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations		1,007			—			—
Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges		—			(18,722	)		—
Loss (gain) on retirement/sale of fixed assets		6			(549	)		(5	)
Deferred taxes		—			—			33,889
Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization charges		—			—			(18,722	)
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		~~2,118~~(814	)		42,~~955~~118			~~(462~~4,955	)
Inventories		2(3,~~897~~149	)		(12,~~542~~897	)		(21,~~541~~542	)
Accounts payable		~~(321~~1,589	)		(~~1,196~~321	)		(41,~~942~~196	)
Other assets		(~~617~~614	)		~~716~~(617	)		~~(825~~716	)
Other liabilities		(~~468~~1,271	)		(~~11,768~~468	)		(411,~~677~~768	)
Cash from (used in) operating activities		11,840			3,045			(1,826	)
Cash (used in) from operating activities		(529	)		11,840			3,045
Cash (used in) from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(~~610~~789	)		(~~414~~610	)		(~~3,568~~414	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets		~~593~~—			41593			—41
Proceeds from sale of product lines		—			128,425			—
Proceeds from the sale of business		12,201			—			128,425
Cash (used in) from investing activities		(17	)		128,052			(3,568	)
Cash from (used in) investing activities		11,412			(17	)		128,052
Cash (used in) from financing activities:
Borrowings under revolving credit facility		55,000			64,100			78,900
Net proceeds from revolver		70,688			—			—
Payments under revolving credit facility		(64,600	)		(75,500	)		(71,900	)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility		32,600			55,000			64,100
Payments under term loan facility		(936	)		(118,312	)		(1,000	)
Payments under revolving credit facility		(58,600	)		(64,600	)		(75,500	)
Other financing costs		(563	)		(591	)		(1,612	)
Payments under term loan facility		(52,252	)		(936	)		(118,312	)
Purchase of Series A Preferred Stock		—			(966	)		—
Other financing costs		(2,905	)		(563	)		(591	)
Proceeds from sale of interest rate swap agreements		—			—			873
Purchase of Series A Preferred Stock		—			—			(966	)
Cash (used in) from financing activities		(11,099	)		(131,269	)		5,261
Cash used in financing activities		(10,469	)		(11,099	)		(131,269	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		~~724~~414			~~(172~~724	)		(~~133~~172	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		~~892~~1,616			~~1,064~~892			1,~~197~~064
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	12,~~616~~030		$	~~892~~1,616		$	~~1,064~~892
Supplemental disclosure:
Interest paid	$	1415,~~074~~532		$	2114,~~528~~074		$	3121,~~863~~528
Non-cash activities, including dividends accrued on redeemable preferred stock	$	1415,~~016~~760		$	1214,~~593~~016		$	1112,~~636~~593

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4340

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Fifty-Three Week Period Ended July 3, 2004 and

For the Fifty-Two Week Periods Ended

June 28, 2003, and June 29, 2002 ~~and June 30, 2001~~

(Dollars in Thousands)

	CommonStock			AdditionalPaid InCapital			AccumulatedDeficit			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome			Other			Total
Balance, July 1, 2000	$	11		$	1,001		$	(75,309	)	$	10		$	(27	)	$	(74,314	)
Balance, June 30, 2001	$	11		$	1,001		$	(92,388	)	$	35		$	(21	)	$	(91,362	)
Net loss		—			—			(5,443	)		—			—			(5,443	)
Preferred stock dividend		—			—			(11,636	)		—			—			(11,636	)
Subscription receivable:
Interest Income		—			—			—			—			(3	)		(3	)
Amortization of unearned compensation		—			—			—			—			9			9
Other comprehensive income:
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—			—			—			1,262			—			1,262
Change in fair value of financial derivatives		—			—			—			(967	)		—			(967	)
Reclassification to interest expense		—			—			—			(215	)		—			(215	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			(55	)		—			(55	)
Balance, June 30, 2001		11			1,001			(92,388	)		35			(21	)		(91,362	)
Net loss		—			—			(31,679	)		—			—			(31,679	)
Preferred stock dividend		—			—			(12,593	)		—			—			(12,593	)
Subscription receivable:
Interest income		—			—			—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Repayment of subscription receivable		—			—			—			—			7			7
Termination of restricted common stock		(1	)		(43	)		—			—			1			(43	)
Amortization of unearned compensation		—			—			—			—			14			14
Other comprehensive loss:
Change in fair value of commodities		—			—			—			(41	)		—			(41	)
Change in fair value of commodity contracts		—			—			—			(41	)		—			(41	)
Recognition of interest income		—			—			—			(211	)		—			(211	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			107			—			107
Balance, June 29, 2002		10			958			(136,660	)		(110	)		—			(135,802	)
Net loss		—			—			(54,606	)		—			—			(54,606	)
Preferred stock dividend		—			—			(14,016	)		—			—			(14,016	)
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of commodities		—			—			—			37			—			37
Change in fair value of commodity contracts		—			—			—			37			—			37
Reclassification to interest expense		—			—			—			(121	)		—			(121	)
Recognition of interest income		—			—			—			(121	)		—			(121	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			206			—			206
Balance, June 28, 2003	$	10		$	958		$	(205,282	)	$	12		$	—		$	(204,302	)
Net loss		—			—			(2,403	)		—			—			(2,403	)
Preferred stock dividend		—			—			(15,760	)		—			—			(15,760	)
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of commodity contracts		—			—			—			176			—			176
Deferred gain on commodity contracts sold		—			—			—			1,969			—			1,969
Recognition of deferred gain on Commodity contracts sold		—			—			—			(1,638	)		—			(1,638	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			(165	)		—			(165	)
Balance, July 3, 2004	$	10		$	958		$	(223,445	)	$	354		$	—		$	(222,123	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4441

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

1. Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying financial statements as of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004 and June 2928, ~~2002~~2003 and for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004, fiscal year ~~2002~~2003, and fiscal year ~~2001~~2002 present the consolidated financial ~~positions~~position, results of operations and cash flows of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. (“~~Eagle~~Holdings”) and ~~the~~its ~~consolidated~~wholly ~~financial~~owned ~~positions~~subsidiary, ~~results of operations and cash flows of~~ Eagle Family Foods ~~Holdings~~, Inc. (“~~Holdings~~Eagle”) ~~and its wholly owned subsidiary,~~ Eagle. ~~Eagle~~ and Holdings are collectively referred to as the “Company”, unless the context indicates otherwise. ~~All~~Under ~~significant~~the ~~intercompany~~guidelines ~~balances~~of Regulation ~~and~~S-X ~~transactions~~Article ~~have~~3, ~~been~~Rule ~~eliminated~~3-10(c), inthe ~~consolidation. Certain~~Company ~~prior~~will ~~year~~only ~~amounts~~present ~~have~~the ~~been~~consolidated ~~reclassified~~financial tostatements ~~conform~~of toHoldings ~~the~~as ~~current~~mentioned ~~year’s~~above ~~presentation.~~and ~~Eagle’s~~will ~~and~~exclude ~~Holdings’~~separate ~~fiscal~~financial ~~year~~statements ~~end~~of Eagle. Eagle is ~~the~~a ~~Saturday~~100% ~~closest~~wholly toowned ~~June~~subsidiary ~~30.~~of ~~Fiscal~~Holdings; Holdings ~~years~~fully ~~are~~and ~~designated~~unconditionally inguarantees the ~~financial~~registered ~~statements~~debt ~~and notes~~issued by ~~the~~Eagle; ~~calendar~~Holdings ~~year~~has inno ~~which~~independent ~~the~~assets ~~fiscal~~or ~~year~~operations; ~~ends~~and Holdings has no other subsidiaries.

~~Eagle~~The ~~was~~Company ~~incorporated~~has onsignificant ~~November~~restrictions ~~14, 1997 and Holdings was incorporated~~ on ~~December~~the ~~22,~~ability ~~1997. On December 30, 1997, Eagle issued 10,000 shares~~ of ~~common stock, par value $.01 per share, for $1,000 to~~ Holdings. ~~Holdings and Eagle did not realize any income~~ or ~~incur~~ any ~~expenses~~guarantor ~~until~~to ~~commencement~~obtain offunds ~~operations on January 23, 1998. On January 23, 1998, Holdings received $82.5 million~~ from GEEagle ~~Investment~~by ~~Private Placement Partners II, a Limited Partnership (“GEI”), Warburg,~~dividend ~~Pincus~~or ~~Ventures,~~loan ~~L.P.~~as ~~(“Warburg”)~~disclosed ~~and certain members of management~~ in ~~exchange~~Note ~~for 825,000 shares of common stock and 816,750 shares of Series A preferred stock~~8. OnThe ~~January~~Company ~~23,~~has ~~1998,~~provided ~~Eagle acquired certain assets of Borden Foods Corporation and certain of their affiliates for $376.8 million. Financing for~~ the ~~acquisition~~disclosures ~~and~~prescribed ~~related~~by ~~fees~~Rule ~~consisted of~~ 4-08(ie) ~~$82.5 million equity contribution from Holdings,~~ (ii3) ~~$115.0 million~~ of ~~8.75%~~Regulation ~~Senior~~S-X ~~Subordinated~~with ~~Notes~~respect ~~(the “Notes”)~~to ~~and (iii) Senior Credit Facilities in~~ the ~~aggregate~~subsidiary ~~principal~~issuers ~~amount of $245.0 million, consisting of a $175.0 million Term Loan Facility~~ and asubsidiary ~~$70~~guarantors.0 ~~million revolving credit facility, under which $16.5 million was drawn at the time of the Acquisition Closing.~~

During the year ended July 3, 2004, the Company had negative cash generated from operating activities. The classification of the Revolving Financing Facility as a current liability caused a working capital deficit. The Revolving Financing Facility is available to the Company through March 23, 2007. The Company will be required to temporarily reduce the amount outstanding under the Revolver B by $20,270,000. Management has evaluated its estimated cash flows in the next operating period and believes that cash generated from operations and borrowings under the Revolving Financing Facility will be sufficient to service interest on the Notes and Revolving Financing Facility, satisfy working capital requirements, meet temporary requirements to reduce the amount of outstanding indebtedness, and make required capital expenditures in fiscal year 2005. However, significant changes in interest rates, the Company’s business, customers and cost of raw materials could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and the Company’s ability to meet its obligations.

All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. Included in these reclassifications is the presentation of the sale of the non-dairy business as discontinued operations pursuant to the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”). See Note 3 to the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company’s fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to June 30. Fiscal years are designated in the financial statements and notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal year ends.

Holdings was incorporated on December 22, 1997 and Eagle was incorporated on November 14, 1997. On December 30, 1997, Eagle issued 10,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, for $1,000 to Holdings. The Company did not realize any income or incur any expenses until commencement of operations on January 23, 1998. On January 23, 1998, Holdings received $82.5 million from GE Investment Private Placement Partners II, a Limited Partnership (“GEI”), Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P. (“Warburg”) and certain members of management in exchange for 825,000 shares of common stock and 816,750 shares of Series A preferred stock. On January 23, 1998, Eagle acquired certain assets of Borden Foods Corporation and certain of their affiliates for $376.8 million (the “Acquisition”). Financing for the acquisition and related fees consisted of (i) $82.5 million equity contribution from Holdings, (ii) $115.0 million of 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Notes”) and (iii) Senior Credit Facilities in the aggregate principal amount of $245.0 million, consisting of a $175.0 million Term Loan Facility and a $70.0 million revolving credit facility, under which $16.5 million was drawn at the time of the Acquisition closing.

The Acquisition was reflected in the financial statements using the purchase method of accounting. The purchase price was allocated to the assets of Eagle based on their fair values. The fair values of assets were determined based on independent appraisals and management estimates.

~~Eagle~~The Company operates in a single segment that markets a portfolio of leading dry-grocery food products with widely recognized and established brands in the United States. The Company’s portfolio of products includes Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk, None Such mincemeat pie filling, ~~Cremora powdered non-dairy creamer,~~ Kava acid-neutralized coffee and Borden eggnog, and through December 24, 2003 included Cremora powdered non-dairy creamer, and through September 19, 2001 included ReaLemon and ReaLime lemon and lime juice from concentrate. The Company ~~also markets~~began ~~sweetened~~marketing ~~condensed milk products in Canada. In the U.S, the Company manufactures sweetened condensed milk and mincemeat pie filling.~~

2.42 ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:~~

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when title, ownership and risk of loss transfers to the customer. Liabilities are established for estimated returns, allowances, consumer and certain trade promotions and discounts when revenues are recognized. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue, as clarified in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101. The Company recorded a cumulative effect from this accounting change of $361,000, net of tax of $212,000.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs amounted to $285,000, $629,000 and $1,510,000 for fiscal year 2003, fiscal year 2002, and fiscal year 2001, respectively.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

premium dessert kits in the current fiscal year. These kits utilize the Company’s Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk product in popular sweetened condensed milk recipes. The Company also markets sweetened condensed milk products in Canada. In the U.S, the Company manufactures sweetened condensed milk and mincemeat pie filling.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when there is persuasive evidence of a sale arrangement, delivery has occurred and title, ownership and risk of loss transfers to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Liabilities are established for estimated returns, allowances, consumer and certain trade promotions and discounts when revenues are recognized. The Company utilizes certain consumer and trade promotions, such as coupons, co-op advertising, featured price discounts and in store display incentives. These expenses are classified as a reduction of sales.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs amounted to $262,000, $285,000 and $629,000 for fiscal year 2004, fiscal year 2003, and fiscal year 2002, respectively.

Advertising and Promotion

The Company advertises its products through national and regional media, and through cooperative advertising programs with retailers. Certain products are also promoted with direct consumer rebate programs. The Company’s customers may also be offered pre-season stocking and in-store promotional allowances.

Production costs of media advertising and consumer promotion events are deferred until the advertising or promotion first occurs. All other advertising and promotion costs are expensed to interim periods in relation to revenues. All amounts paid or payable to customers or consumers in connection with the purchase of the Company’s products are recorded as a reduction of net sales. Advertising and promotional expenses were $31,~~871~~469,000, $3031,~~830~~871,000 and $3930,~~877~~830,000 for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004, fiscal year ~~2002~~2003, and fiscal year ~~2001~~2002, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers liquid investments purchased with an initial term to maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company provides for an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of the accounts receivable balances, historical write-off experience and an on-going review of our trade customers and those customers’ ability to make payment.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost of goods sold being determined using the first-in, first-out method.

Slotting Allowance

The costs of obtaining shelf space (slotting) are expensed over a period not to exceed twelve months. Slotting expense was $~~122~~138,000, $~~392~~122,000, and $~~567~~392,000 for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004, fiscal year ~~2002~~2003, and fiscal year ~~2001~~2002, respectively.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated for financial reporting purposes on a straight-line method using estimated service lives ranging principally from 8-20 years for buildings and improvements and 3-10 years for other property and equipment. When assets are sold, retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any related gain or loss is recorded in the statement of operations. Normal maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, while major renewals and betterments that extend service lives are capitalized.

Capitalized Software Development Costs

Certain external costs and internal payroll and payroll related costs incurred during the application development and implementation stages of a software project are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software costs were $9,063,000 at ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004 and June 2928, ~~2002~~2003, and had a net book value of $199,~~185,~~000 and $21,~~996~~185,000 at ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004 and June 2928, ~~2002~~2003, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives, such as trademarks that are not subject to amortization, are tested annually for impairment of value. Impairment occurs when the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. If impaired, the asset’s carrying amount is reduced to its fair market value. The Company’s annual impairment testing is performed during the first quarter of the fiscal year.

Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. Impairment occurs when the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. If impaired, the asset is written down to its fair value. (See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional financial disclosure.)

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

Impairment occurs when the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. If impaired, the asset is written down to its fair value. (See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional financial disclosure.)

Other Non-current Assets

Other non-current assets at ~~June~~July 283, 2004 ~~2003~~ and June 2928, ~~2002~~2003 consisted primarily of net deferred financing costs amounting to approximately $4,~~274~~547,000 and $54,~~160~~274,000, respectively. Such costs are amortized over the term of the related debt using the interest method.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes inon ~~accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” (“SFAS No. 109”) which requires~~ the ~~use of the~~ liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. ~~Under~~The ~~SFAS No. 109, the~~ effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company assesses the recoverability of the deferred tax assets inand ~~accordance~~has ~~with the provisions of SFAS No. 109. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, the Company~~ determined that a valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards was required as of June 29, 2002. The Company has continued to record a full valuation allowance. As of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004 and June 2928, 2003, the amount was $5354,~~291~~198,000 and $3353,~~167~~291,000, respectively.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosure of contingent assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

Foreign Currency Translation

All assets and liabilities of Canadian operations are translated into U.S. dollars using the rate at the end of the fiscal period. Income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the fiscal period. Foreign currency assets, liabilities, income and expenses were not significant to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable as stated on the balance sheets approximate their fair market values because of their short maturities. The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of the Company’s derivatives is estimated based on dealer quotes for those instruments.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging

InThe ~~July~~Company ~~2000,~~accounts ~~the~~for ~~Company~~derivative ~~adopted~~instruments and hedging in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recognized as assets and liabilities in the financial statements at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge (fair value or cash flow), changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The amount of the hedged item is expected to be recorded to earnings within twelve months. The change in a derivative’s fair value related to the ineffective portion of a hedge, if any, will be immediately recognized in earnings. For fiscal year 2004, there have been no gains or losses recognized in earnings for hedge ineffectiveness. The Company’s current financial derivatives are treated as cash flow hedges.

47As of July 3, 2004, the Company had purchased 154 milk futures contracts, which will settle during various months through May 2005, at a cost of $4,091,000 and a current market value of $4,011,000, or an aggregate market loss of $80,000. The aggregate market value will increase or decrease based on the future milk prices.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

The adoption of the pronouncement resulted in an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income of $1,262,000, net of tax, for the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement. On November 9, 2000, the Company sold its interest rate swap positions for fair market gains of $873,000. Pursuant to SFAS 133, the gains on the interest rate swap agreements will remain in other comprehensive income and be reclassified as interest expense over the original terms of the interest rate swap agreements. The interest income in other comprehensive loss as of December 30, 2000 was amortized through the period ending December 31, 2002.

As of June 28, 2003, the Company had purchased 490 milk futures contracts, which will settle during various months through June 2004, at a cost of $11,500,000 and a current market value of $11,250,000, or an aggregate market loss of $250,000. The aggregate market value will increase or decrease based on the future milk prices.

Environmental

The Company, like other companies in similar businesses, is subject to extensive Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Although the Company’s environmental policies and practices are designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, future developments and increasingly stringent regulations could require the Company to incur additional unforeseen environmental expenditures. Environmental remediation costs are accrued when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the cost within or a reasonable range can be estimated. Environmental expenditures, which improve the condition of the property, are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful life. The Company has not incurred any significant ~~environmental~~ environmental liabilities.

Recently ~~Issued~~Adopted Accounting ~~Statements~~ Statements

In ~~October~~December ~~2001~~2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ~~SFAS~~FASB Interpretation No. ~~144,~~46 ~~“Accounting~~(revised ~~for~~December ~~the~~2003), ~~Impairment~~“Consolidation ~~or Disposal~~ of ~~Long-Lived~~Variable ~~Assets~~Interest Entities” (“~~SFAS~~FIN No. ~~144~~46R”). ~~SFAS~~FIN ~~144~~No. ~~supersedes~~46R ~~SFAS~~varies ~~121~~significantly ~~and~~from ~~applies~~FASB toInterpretation ~~all~~No. ~~long-lived assets (including discontinued~~46, ~~operations)~~“Consolidation ~~and~~of ~~consequently~~Variable ~~amends~~Interest ~~Accounting~~Entities” ~~Principles~~(“FIN ~~Board Opinion~~ No. 3046”), ~~“Reporting~~which ~~Results~~it ofsupersedes. ~~Operations~~FIN ~~Reporting~~No. 46R requires the ~~Effects~~application of ~~Disposal~~either ofFIN aNo. ~~Segment~~46 ofor aFIN ~~Business~~No.”. ~~SFAS~~46R ~~144~~by ~~develops~~“Public anEntities” ~~accounting~~(as ~~model~~defined ~~(based~~in onparagraph ~~the~~395 ~~model~~of inFASB ~~SFAS~~Statement ~~121)~~No ~~for~~123, ~~disposal~~“Accounting offor ~~long~~Stock-~~lived~~Based ~~assets.~~Compensation”) ~~This~~to ~~model~~all ~~requires~~Special ~~that~~Purpose ~~long-lived~~Entities ~~assets~~(“SPEs”) ~~that~~created ~~are~~prior to beFebruary ~~disposed~~1, of2003 ~~be measured~~ at the ~~lower~~end of ~~book~~the ~~value~~first interim or ~~fair~~annual ~~value,~~reporting ~~less~~period ~~cost~~ending toafter ~~sell.~~December ~~Additionally~~15, ~~SFAS 144 expands the scope of discontinued~~2003. ~~operations~~All toentities ~~include~~created ~~all~~after ~~components~~January of31, an2003 ~~entity~~by ~~with~~Public ~~operations~~Entities ~~that~~were ~~(1)~~already ~~can~~required to be ~~distinguished~~analyzed ~~from~~under ~~the~~FIN ~~rest~~No. of46, ~~the entity~~ and ~~(2)~~they ~~will~~must becontinue ~~eliminated~~to ~~from~~do ~~the~~so, ~~ongoing~~unless ~~operations~~FIN ofNo. ~~the~~46R ~~entity~~is inadopted aearly. ~~disposal~~FIN ~~transaction~~No. ~~SFAS~~46R ~~144~~is ~~was~~applicable ~~effective~~to ~~for the~~all ~~Company’s~~non-SPEs ~~first~~created ~~quarter~~prior ofto February ~~fiscal~~1, ~~year~~ 2003. ~~The~~by ~~adoption~~Public ofEntities ~~this~~at ~~pronouncement did not have a material impact on~~ the ~~Company’s~~end ~~results~~ of ~~operations~~the orfirst ~~financial~~interim ~~condition.~~

In45 April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 (“SFAS No. 13”) and Technical Corrections” (“SFAS No. 145”) with an adoption date of fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. This pronouncement rescinds the aforementioned Statements and amends SFAS No. 13 and other various authoritative pronouncements to clarify, correct technically or describe applicability under changed conditions. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS No. 146”). SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Costs covered by SFAS No. 146 include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity that is initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company has adopted this pronouncement for activities after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees. This interpretation also clarifies the requirements related to the recognition of a liability by a guarantor at the inception of a guarantee for the obligations the guarantor has undertaken in issuing that guarantee. FIN No. 45 is effective for all guarantees issued or ~~modified~~ ~~after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements for interim and~~ annual ~~periods~~reporting period ending after ~~December~~March 15, ~~2002~~2004. The ~~Company adopted the disclosure requirements and the recognition provisions of FIN 45 in third quarter 2003. The~~ adoption of this ~~interpretation~~standard did not have aany ~~material~~effect ~~impact~~ on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In ~~January~~July 2003, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ~~Interpretation~~ SFAS No. 46150, “~~Consolidation~~Accounting offor ~~Variable~~Certain ~~Interest~~Financial ~~Entities,~~Instruments anWith ~~interpretation~~Characteristics of ~~ARB~~Both ~~No.~~Liabilities 51and Equity” (“~~FIN~~SFAS No. 46150”). ~~FIN~~SFAS No. 46150 ~~expands~~establishes ~~existing~~standards ~~accounting~~for ~~guidance~~how ~~regarding~~an ~~when~~issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that an issuer classify a ~~variable~~financial ~~interest~~instrument ~~entity~~that is ~~consolidated~~within byits scope as a ~~company~~liability, ifor ~~that~~as an asset in some circumstances. SFAS No. 150 applies to three types of freestanding financial instruments, other than outstanding shares. One type is mandatory redeemable shares, which the issuing company is ~~subject~~obligated to abuy ~~majority~~back ofin ~~the~~exchange ~~risk~~for ofcash ~~loss~~or ~~from~~assets; ~~the~~a ~~variable~~second ~~interest~~type ~~entity’s~~includes put options and forward purchase ~~activities~~contracts that require or ismay ~~entitled~~require the issuer to ~~receive~~buy aback ~~majority~~some of ~~the~~its ~~variable~~shares ~~interest~~in ~~entity’s~~exchange ~~residual~~for ~~returns~~cash or ~~both.~~other ~~This~~assets; ~~pronouncement~~the ~~applies~~third ~~immediately~~type tois ~~variable~~obligations ~~interest~~that ~~entities~~can ~~created~~be ~~after~~settled ~~January~~with 31shares, ~~2003~~the ~~and~~monetary tovalue ~~variable~~of ~~interest~~which ~~entities~~is infixed, ties solely or predominantly ~~which~~to a ~~company~~variable ~~obtains~~such anas ~~interest~~a ~~after~~market ~~that~~index, ~~date~~or varies inversely with the value of the issuers’ shares. ~~For~~SFAS ~~variable~~No. ~~interest~~150 ~~entities~~does ~~created~~not ~~prior~~apply to ~~February~~features 1,embedded ~~2003,~~in ~~the~~a ~~provisions~~financial instrument that is not a derivative in its entirety. The Company considered the classification of its redeemable preferred stock and determined that this ~~pronouncement~~stock ~~are~~is ~~effective~~contingently ~~June~~redeemable. 29Accordingly, ~~2003.~~these ~~The~~securities ~~adoption~~are outside the scope of ~~FIN~~SFAS No. 46150 isand ~~not~~adoption ~~expected~~of tothis standard did not have any effect on ~~the~~ the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In ~~April~~December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. ~~149~~132 (revised 2003),”Employers’ ~~“Amendment~~Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of ~~Statement~~FASB ~~133~~Statements onNo. ~~Derivative~~87, ~~Instruments~~88 and ~~Hedging~~106, ~~Activities~~and a revision of FASB Statement No. 132” (“SFAS No. ~~149~~132”). SFAS No. ~~149~~132 ~~amends~~revises ~~and~~employers’ ~~clarifies~~disclosures ~~the~~about ~~accounting~~pension ~~guidance~~plans onand ~~derivative instruments~~other ~~(including~~postretirement ~~certain~~benefit ~~derivative~~plans. ~~instruments~~It ~~embedded~~does innot ~~other~~change ~~contracts)~~the ~~and~~measurement ~~hedging~~or ~~activities~~recognition ~~that~~of ~~fall~~those ~~within~~plans ~~the~~required ~~scope~~by ofFASB ~~SFAS~~Statements No. ~~133~~87, “Employers’ Accounting for ~~Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities~~Pensions,”. ~~SFAS~~ No. ~~149 also amends certain other existing pronouncements~~88, ~~which~~“Employers’ ~~will~~Accounting ~~result~~for inSettlements ~~more~~and ~~consistent~~Curtailments ~~reporting~~ of ~~contracts~~Defined ~~that~~Benefit ~~are~~Pension ~~derivatives~~Plans inand ~~their~~for ~~entirety~~Termination orBenefits” ~~that~~and ~~contain~~No. ~~embedded~~106, ~~derivatives~~“Employers’ ~~that~~Accounting ~~warrant~~for Postretirement ~~separate~~Benefits ~~accounting~~Other Than Pensions.” SFAS No. ~~149~~132 isrequires ~~effective~~additional ~~for~~disclosures ~~contracts entered~~about ~~into~~the orassets, ~~modified~~obligations, ~~after~~cash ~~June~~flows ~~30,~~and ~~2003,~~net ~~with~~periodic ~~certain~~benefit ~~exceptions,~~cost ~~and~~of ~~for~~defined ~~hedging~~benefit ~~relationships~~pension ~~initiated~~plans ~~after~~and ~~June~~other ~~30,~~postretirement ~~2003~~benefit plans. The required ~~guidance~~information ~~outlined~~has inbeen ~~this~~provided ~~pronouncement~~separately isfor topension beplans ~~applied~~and ~~prospectively,~~for ~~and~~other ispostretirement ~~effective~~benefit inplans. ~~the~~This ~~first~~includes ~~quarter~~expanded ~~of the~~disclosure ~~Company’s~~on ~~fiscal~~an ~~year~~interim ~~2004~~basis as well. The ~~adoption~~new ofdisclosures ~~this~~are ~~pronouncement~~required isfor ~~not~~fiscal ~~expected~~years toending ~~have~~after ~~any~~December 15, ~~effect~~2003. onThe ~~the~~disclosures ~~Company’s~~required ~~results~~by ofthis ~~operations~~statement orare ~~financial~~included ~~condition~~within Note 15 of the Financial Statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS No. 150”). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how companies classify and measure certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires companies to classify a financial instrument as defined within the scope of the pronouncement as liabilities (or an asset in some circumstances). The pronouncement is effective for the first quarter of the fiscal year ending July 3, 2004. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have any effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial conditions.

3. Divestiture and restructuring activities:

On ~~September~~December 1924, ~~2001~~2003, the Company sold to ~~Mott’s~~Dean ~~Inc.~~Specialty ~~and~~Foods ~~Cadbury Beverages Delaware~~Group, ~~Inc.~~LLC the Company’s business of ~~developing, manufacturing,~~ marketing, distributing and selling ~~shelf~~powdered non-~~stable~~dairy ~~juice~~creamer sold under the ~~ReaLemon~~Cremora and ~~ReaLime~~Cremora Royale brand names (~~the~~ “~~Realemon~~Non-Dairy ~~product~~Creamer ~~lines~~Business”) and related assets, including inventory ~~and~~(“Non-Dairy ~~the~~Creamer ~~manufacturing~~Sale”). ~~facility~~The inpurchase ~~Waterloo,~~price ~~New~~was ~~York for~~ $~~128~~12,~~425~~201,000 ~~(the “ReaLemon Sale”)~~. The Company recognized a ~~gain~~loss of $181,~~722~~007,000 on the ~~ReaLemon Sale~~sale, ~~net~~which included the book values of ~~reorganization~~$3,433,000, $6,307,000, $2,260,000 and ~~transition~~$201,000 ~~charges~~for oftradenames, goodwill, inventory and other prepaid assets, respectively. The Company incurred $41,~~769~~007,000 of expenses related to the Non-Dairy Creamer Sale.

InEffective ~~connection~~December ~~with~~30, ~~the ReaLemon Sale~~2002, the Company ~~committed~~closed toits apowdered ~~plan~~non-dairy creamer ~~(“the~~manufacturing ~~Plan”)~~plant toin ~~reorganize~~Chester, ~~the~~South ~~management~~Carolina ~~and~~(“Non-Dairy ~~operations~~Creamer ofPlant ~~the Company~~Closure”). ~~The~~In ~~Plan~~connection ~~included~~with the ~~reduction~~Non-Dairy ofCreamer ~~approximately~~Plant ~~60 employees~~Closure, ~~including executives and administrative staff at~~ the ~~offices~~Company inrecorded ~~Tarrytown,~~a ~~New~~charge ~~York;~~of ~~Columbus~~$1, ~~Ohio; and Gahanna~~190,000 ~~Ohio, and the closure of corporate and research and development offices. The Company completed the tactical actions of the Plan. Costs expensed related to the Plan~~ in fiscal year ~~2002~~2003. ~~and~~The ~~classified~~closure ~~as part of the “Gain on sale of product lines, net of reorganization~~ charges ~~and other charges” on the~~ ~~Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss~~ included $31,~~942~~321,000 ~~severance~~for ~~and related~~ termination ~~costs~~pay and ~~$827,000~~benefits for ~~contractual~~the ~~lease~~79 ~~liabilities~~displaced ~~and~~employees, ~~related~~$411,000 ~~office~~for other plant closure costs. ~~The~~and ~~remaining~~contractual ~~cash requirements of the Plan as of June 28~~expenditures, ~~2003~~offset ~~are~~by ~~expected~~a ~~to total approximately~~ $~~130~~542,000 ~~and~~gain ~~are~~on ~~expected~~the tosale beof ~~paid~~the bySouth ~~August~~Carolina ~~2003~~property.

49On September 19, 2001, the Company sold to Mott’s, Inc. and Cadbury Beverages Delaware, Inc. the Company’s business of developing, manufacturing, marketing, distributing, and selling shelf-stable juice sold under the ReaLemon and ReaLime brand names (the “ReaLemon product lines”) and related assets, including inventory and the manufacturing facility in Waterloo, New York for $128,425,000 (the “ReaLemon Sale”). The Company recognized a gain of $18,722,000 on the ReaLemon Sale, inclusive of reorganization and transition charges of $4,769,000.

In connection with the ReaLemon Sale, the Company committed to a plan (the “Plan”) to reorganize the management and operations of the Company. The Plan included the reduction of approximately 60 employees,

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

~~The~~ including ~~selected~~executives ~~consolidated~~and ~~results~~administrative ofstaff ~~operations~~at ~~excluding~~ the ~~results~~offices ofin ~~operations~~Tarrytown, ~~for~~New York; Columbus, Ohio; and Gahanna, Ohio, and the closure of corporate and ~~ReaLemon~~research and ~~ReaLime~~development ~~product~~offices. ~~lines~~Costs onexpensed arelated ~~pro~~to ~~forma~~the ~~basis~~Plan ~~for~~in fiscal year ~~2003,~~2002 ~~fiscal~~included ~~year~~$3,942,000 ~~2002~~severance and ~~fiscal~~related ~~year~~termination ~~2001~~costs ~~were~~and ~~(in~~$827,000 ~~thousands~~for contractual lease liabilities and ~~unaudited):~~related office closure costs.

	June 28, 2003		June 29, 2002		June 30, 2001
Net sales	$	128,722	$	132,319	$	129,859
Gross margin	$	47,409	$	36,276	$	51,725
Operating income	$	17,490	$	776	$	8,491

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, the results of operations of the Non-Dairy Creamer Business have been classified as discontinued operations and prior period results of operations have been reclassified. Interest expense associated with the term debt to be paid down because of the sale of the businesses has been allocated to discontinued operations.

The results of operations of ~~Eagle are substantially consistent with that of~~ the ~~consolidated~~discontinued ~~results~~businesses ofare ~~operations~~as offollows ~~Holdings.~~(in thousands):

Effective December 30, 2002, the Company closed its powdered non-dairy creamer manufacturing plant in Chester, South Carolina (“Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure”). Production is now sourced from a third party manufacturer under a long-term co-pack agreement entered into on October 1, 2002. The third party manufacturer has significantly larger powdered non-dairy creamer plants than the Company had and has agreed to produce the Company’s powdered non-dairy creamer requirements at a lower cost than the Company’s cost of production. During the quarter ended March 29, 2003, the Company sold the South Carolina Property for $592,000.


	Fifty-Three Week Period Ended July 3, 2004		Fifty-Two Week Period Ended
	Fifty-Three Week Period Ended July 3, 2004		June 28, 2003		June 29, 2002
Net sales	$	7,368	$	23,061	$	27,498
Operating income		920		795		1,431
Interest expense, net		313		659		770

Income from discontinued operations	$	607		136	$	661

InIncluded ~~connection~~within ~~with~~ the ~~Non-Dairy Creamer Plant~~ ~~Closure,~~operating ~~the~~income ~~Company recorded a charge of $1,190,000~~ for ~~fiscal year 2003, and included~~ the ~~expense~~fifty-two ~~within~~week ~~the~~period ~~classification~~ended ofJune ~~“Gain (loss) on sale of product lines~~28, ~~net~~2003 ofwas ~~reorganization charges and other charges” on~~ the ~~Consolidated Statements~~charge of ~~Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The closure charges included~~ $1,~~321~~190,000 for ~~termination pay and benefits for~~ the 79 displaced employees, $411,000 for other plant closure costs and contractual expenditures, offset by a $542,000 gain on the sale of the South Carolina Property. As of June 28, 2003, the remaining cash requirements of the Non-Dairy Creamer Plant Closure ~~are expected to total $296,000 and are expected to be paid by December 2003~~.

4. Inventories:

Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market and ~~at June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002~~ consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 28, 2003		June 29, 2002
	July 3, 2004		June 28, 2003
Finished goods	$	31,~~384~~342	$	3331,~~915~~384
Raw material		1,~~210~~956		1,~~576~~210
Total inventories	$	3233,~~594~~298	$	3532,~~491~~594

5. Property and Equipment:

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002
	July 3, 2004			June 28, 2003
Land	$	355		$	~~390~~355
Buildings and improvements		3,~~694~~575			63,~~996~~694
Machinery and equipment		1213,~~732~~147			2112,~~965~~732
Computers		1011,~~859~~033			10,~~996~~859
Construction in progress		~~442~~110			~~110~~442
Total property and equipment		28,~~082~~220			4028,~~457~~082
Accumulated depreciation		(2224,~~508~~260	)		(3122,~~787~~508	)
Net property and equipment	$	53,~~574~~960		$	85,~~670~~574

The Company periodically reviews the useful lives of its assets, and when warranted, changes are made that result in an acceleration of depreciation. The Company recorded a charge of $11,126,000 in fiscal year 2002 for accelerated depreciation related to long-lived assets that may be taken out of service before the end of their normal service period due to expected strategic initiatives.

5047

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

long-lived assets that will be taken out of service before the end of their normal service period due to the Plan. The useful lives of assets related to the strategic initiatives were shortened, resulting in incremental depreciation expense totaling $11,126,000 for fiscal year 2002.

6. Intangible Assets:

Effective June 30, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). In accordance with this standard, goodwill and certain other intangible assets have been classified as indefinite-lived assets that are no longer subject to amortization. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to an impairment test upon adoption and at least annually thereafter. As of June 30, 2002, the value of the indefinite-lived tradenames was determined using a royalty savings methodology and discounted cash flows. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $43,736,000 against tradenames. After completing the valuation and impairment of the tradenames, a market valuation of goodwill was assessed based on estimated future discounted cash flow earnings. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $12,878,000 against goodwill. The transitional impairment charge was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change. The Company’s performed its annual ~~amortization~~impairment ~~charge~~test ~~will~~of beintangible ~~reduced~~assets byduring anthe ~~estimated~~period $4ended September 27,~~500~~ 2003 and during the quarterly period ending October 2,~~000~~ in2004, ~~fiscal~~and ~~year~~determined ~~2003~~there was no impairment. ~~The~~Pursuant ~~useful~~to ~~lives~~the sale of ~~intangible~~ ~~assets~~the ~~still~~Non-Dairy ~~subject~~Creamer toBusiness, ~~amortization~~the ~~were~~Company ~~not~~sold ~~revised~~tradenames ~~because~~and ofgoodwill with the ~~adoption~~book values of ~~SFAS~~$3,433,000 and ~~No.~~$6,307,000, ~~142~~respectively.

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 28, 2003							June 29, 2002
	July 3, 2004		June 28, 2003
	GrossCarryingAmount		AccumulatedAmortization			Net CarryingAmount		GrossCarryingAmount		AccumulatedAmortization			Net CarryingAmount
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Tradenames	$	33,783	$	37,217
Covenant not to compete	$	13,847	$	(13,847	)	$	—	$	13,847	$	(12,195	)	$	1,652
Goodwill		61,047		67,354
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Total unamortized intangible assets	$	94,830	$	104,571
Tradenames							37,217							80,953
Goodwill							67,354							80,232
Total unamortized intangible assets							104,571							161,185
Total intangible assets						$	104,571						$	162,837

Total amortization of intangible assets ~~were~~was $1,652,000, and $8,040,000 ~~and $11,141,000~~ for fiscal year 2003, ~~fiscal year 2002,~~ and fiscal year ~~2001~~2002, respectively.

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, fiscal year 2002 ~~and~~was ~~fiscal year 2001 have~~ not ~~been~~ restated to reflect the accounting change. The table below presents a reconciliation of net income as if SFAS No. 142 had been adopted for fiscal year 2002 ~~and fiscal year 2001 (in thousands)~~.

	Fifty-Two Week Period Ended
	Fifty-Three WeekPeriod Ended July 3, 2004				Fifty-Two WeekPeriod Ended
	~~June 28, 2003~~			~~June 29, 2002~~	June 28, 2003		June 3029, ~~2001~~2002
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	(2,~~008~~403	)	$	~~(31,679~~$	)2,008	$	(531,~~082~~679	)
Amortization of intangible assets, net of tax and valuation allowance		—			~~4,992~~	—		4,~~373~~992
Adjusted net income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	(2,~~008~~403	)	$	~~(26,687~~$	)2,008	$	(~~709~~26,687	)

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

7. Debt:

Debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002
	July 3, 2004			June 28, 2003
Senior subordinated notes due January 15, 2008	$	115,000		$	115,000
Term loan facility due December 31, 2005		52,252			53,188
Revolving financing facility due March 23, 2007		70,688			—
Revolving credit facility due December 3, 2004		26,000			35,000
Term loan facility due December 31, 2005		—			52,252
Revolving credit facility swingline loan due December 31, 2003		—			600
Revolving credit facility due December 31, 2004		—			26,000
Total debt		~~193~~185,~~252~~688			~~203~~193,~~788~~252
Less: current portion of long-term debt		(8,578	)		(936	)
Less: current portion of long-term debt and revolving financing facility		(70,688	)		(8,578	)
Long-term debt	$	~~184~~115,~~674~~000		$	~~202~~184,~~852~~674

~~Senior~~48 ~~Credit Facilities~~

The Company is the borrower under a credit agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, as amended (the “Senior Credit Facilities”), which consists of (1) a $50.0 million seven-year revolving credit facility, including a $10.0 million swingline loan (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and (2) an eight-year term loan (the “Term Loan Facility”). The Senior Credit Facilities are guaranteed by Holdings and all future domestic subsidiaries of the Company.

The interest rate on the Term Loan Facility is LIBOR plus 4.25%. The interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 4.25% with the swingline loan portion bearing interest at Prime plus 3.25%. The fair market value of the Senior Credit Facilities at June 28, 2003 was approximately the carrying value.

The Senior Credit Facilities contain financial covenants, which require the Company to meet certain financial tests including debt coverage, interest expense coverage and capital expenditure requirements. The Senior Credit Facilities also contain covenants including limitations on additional indebtedness, liens, asset sales, capital expenditures, sale and leaseback transactions, dividends, loans and investments, modification of material agreements, transaction with affiliates, acquisitions, mergers and consolidations and prepayment of subordinated indebtedness. The Senior Credit Facilities agreement provides that neither Holdings or Eagle will, nor will they permit any subsidiary of Eagle to, declare or make, or agree to pay or make, directly or indirectly, any dividend and certain other distributions and payments, except primarily (1) Holdings may declare and pay dividends with respect to its capital stock payable solely in additional shares of its capital stock (other than redeemable preferred stock) and (2) subsidiaries of Eagle may declare and pay dividends ratable with respect to their capital stock. The Senior Credit Facilities agreement also requires the Company to pledge assets acquired after the Acquisition Closing, including stock of after-acquired or formed subsidiaries, to deliver guarantees by wholly owned domestic subsidiaries and to maintain insurance. The Senior Credit Facilities contain customary events of default, including certain changes of control of the Company.

The Company amended its Credit Agreement pursuant to an amendment dated November 21, 2002 (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the Amendment, the lenders waived compliance with certain coverage ratio financial covenants for the period commencing on and including December 29, 2002 and ending on and including the Revolving Credit Facility maturity date. The Amendment includes restrictions on the carrying balance of the Revolving Credit Facility for a period of thirty consecutive days commencing on a date not earlier than December of any year and ending not later than January 31 of the following year. The Amendment also sets forth minimum requirements for consolidated earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization, sets forth maximum requirements for capital expenditures, and changed the total allowable commitment and interest rates. The Company is in compliance with the abovementioned covenants and it believes it can meet existing bank covenants pursuant to the Credit Agreement, as amended, for each of the next four quarters ending July 3, 2004.

The Company’s ability to meet the bank covenants will be dependent upon the Company’s future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions and financial operations. There can be no assurance that the Company’s future performance will not be affected negatively by changes in the above factors to such a degree that it affects the Company’s ability to meet bank covenants. There can be no assurance that the Company could

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

On March 23, 2004, the Company entered into a Financing Agreement (the “Financing ~~renegotiate~~Agreement’) ~~its~~by ~~covenants~~and among Eagle, ~~refinance~~Holdings, ~~its~~as ~~debt~~a guarantor, orand ~~obtain~~certain ~~terms~~financial institutions party thereto from time to time (the “Lenders”), Fortress Credit Opportunities I LP (“Fortress”), as collateral agent for the Lenders, and Congress Financial Corporation (Central) (“Congress”), an administrative agent for the Lenders. The Financing Agreement provides for a secured revolving credit facility that consists of (1) an asset-based revolving credit facility (“Revolver A”) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $27,000,000 at any time outstanding, including a subfacility for the issuance of letters of credit in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5,000,000, and (2) a revolving credit facility (“Revolver B”, and together with Revolver A, the “Revolving Financing Facility”) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $55,000,000. The borrowings under Revolver A are ~~favorable~~subject to a maximum borrowing base based on the ~~financial~~calculation ~~position~~of 65% of the book value of eligible inventory and 85% of the value of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable as defined in the Financing Agreement. The Company must borrow the maximum amount available under Revolver B before the Company can utilize Revolver A. As of July 3, 2004, the borrowings under Revolver A were $15,688,000, and the borrowings under Revolver B were $55,000,000. The maturity date of the Financing Agreement is March 23, 2007, subject to extensions if certain conditions are met.

The ~~obligations~~Company’s Revolving ofFinancing ~~Eagle~~Facility includes a lockbox arrangement, which provides for all cash receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding under the ~~Senior~~Revolving ~~Credit~~Financing ~~Facilities~~Facility. ~~are collateralized~~This byarrangement, ~~(1)~~combined ~~100%~~with the existence of ~~the~~a subjective ~~capital~~acceleration ~~stock~~clause, ofcauses the ~~Company~~Revolving ~~and~~Financing ~~each~~Facility ofbalance ~~its~~to ~~subsidiaries~~be ~~and~~classified ~~(2)~~as a ~~first~~current ~~priority~~liability ~~collateral~~on ~~interest~~the balance sheet in ~~substantially~~accordance ~~all~~with ~~assets~~the ~~and~~FASB’s ~~properties~~Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-22, “Balance Sheet Classification of ~~the~~Borrowings ~~Company~~Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that Include Both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and ~~its~~a ~~future~~Lock-Box ~~domestic~~Arrangement” ~~subsidiaries~~(“EITF 95-22”). The ~~fair~~acceleration ~~market~~clause allows the Company’s lenders to ~~value~~accelerate payment of the ~~senior~~obligation ~~credit~~or ~~facilities~~to atterminate ~~June~~the ~~28,~~Financing ~~2003~~Agreement ~~approximates~~upon the ~~carrying~~occurrence ~~value~~of an event or development that would be reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations, business, assets, properties or condition (financial or otherwise). Management believes that no such event or development has occurred.

AsThe ofproceeds ~~June~~from 28the Revolving Financing Facility were used, ~~2003~~in part, to repay all amounts outstanding under the Company’s ~~had~~previous ~~letters~~bank offacilities and ~~credit~~will ~~totaling~~be ~~$600~~used,~~000~~ ~~under~~in ~~the~~part, ~~Revolving~~to ~~Credit~~fund ~~Facility~~working ascapital ~~required~~of bythe ~~certain~~Company ~~insurance~~and ~~policies~~for other general corporate purposes.

~~Senior~~The ~~Subordinated~~interest ~~Notes~~rate on Revolver A is LIBOR plus 3.0% or the reference rate as announced by Wachovia Bank (the “Reference Rate”) plus 0.5%. The interest rate on Revolver B is 10.0% plus the greater of 2.0% and LIBOR or 8.0% plus the greater of 4.0% and the Reference Rate. The fair market value of the Revolving Financing Facility at April 3, 2004 was approximately the carrying value.

The ~~Company’s~~Revolving ~~Notes~~Financing ~~are~~Facility ~~due~~contains ~~January~~financial 15covenants, which ~~2008~~require ~~bearing~~the ~~interest~~Company ofto ~~8.75%~~meet ~~per~~certain ~~annum,~~financial ~~payable~~tests onincluding ~~January~~senior 15debt ~~and~~leverage, ~~July~~fixed 15charge coverage, ~~commencing~~and ~~July~~consolidated 15earnings before interest, ~~1998~~income tax, and depreciation and amortization expenses. The Company is required to reduce the ~~fair~~outstanding ~~market~~principal ~~value~~amount of Revolver B to specific amounts by December 31 of each of the ~~Notes~~next ~~was~~three ~~approximately~~years. The principal amount as of December 31, 2004 is to be less than $7834,~~200~~730,000. In addition, the Company is restricted from accumulating or maintaining an aggregate amount of cash in bank accounts, other cash equivalents and investments in excess of $872,~~400~~000,000 atfor ~~June~~a ~~28,~~period ~~2003~~of ~~and~~more ~~June~~than ~~29,~~ten ~~2002~~consecutive business days, ~~respectively.~~subject to certain exceptions as permitted by the Financing Agreement.

The ~~Notes~~Revolving ~~are~~Financing ~~unconditionally~~Facility ~~guaranteed~~also bycontains ~~Holdings~~covenants including ~~(the~~limitations ~~“Parent~~on ~~Guarantee”)~~liens, ~~and~~indebtedness, bydispositions, ~~each future Domestic Subsidiary of the Company (each~~acquisitions, ~~a “Domestic Subsidiary Guarantee” and~~mergers, ~~collectively~~consolidations, ~~the~~changes ~~“Domestic~~in ~~Subsidiary Guarantees”). The Company currently has no domestic subsidiaries and therefore none that guarantee~~ the ~~Notes.~~nature ~~The Parent Guarantee and the Domestic Subsidiary Guarantees are joint and several as well as full and unconditional. The Notes are unsecured and subordinated in right~~ of ~~payment~~business, ~~to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company. The Notes include certain covenants including limitations on indebtedness~~loans, ~~dividends and other payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries~~advances, ~~subordinated liens~~investments, sale and leaseback transactions, ~~sale or issuance of~~ capital ~~stock of subsidiaries~~expenditures, ~~merger, consolidation or sale of assets,~~ transactions with affiliates ~~and layering debt. The indenture provides that the Company will not~~, dividends and ~~will~~other ~~not permit any of its subsidiaries~~payments, ~~directly~~issuances ~~or indirectly, to declare or pay any dividend or make any distribution on or in respect~~ of ~~its~~ capital stock ~~except~~and ~~dividends~~excess orcash. ~~distributions~~The ~~payable~~Revolving ~~solely~~Financing inFacility ~~its~~contains ~~capital~~customary ~~stock~~events ~~(other~~of ~~than~~default, ~~redeemable~~including ~~stock)~~certain ~~and~~changes ~~except~~in ~~dividends~~control ~~or distributions payable solely to the Company or any wholly-owned subsidiary~~ of the Company. ~~Furthermore, Holdings’~~The ~~ability~~Company ~~to obtain funds from its subsidiaries~~ is ~~restricted~~currently byin ~~the~~compliance ~~Notes~~with ~~because (1) Holdings may not hold assets other than Company capital stock and other minimal assets related to~~ the covenants ~~business~~ of ~~holding such stock and (2) Holdings may not incur any additional liabilities other than in~~ the ~~ordinary~~Financing ~~course of business~~Agreement.

OnThe ~~April~~Company ~~16,~~has ~~1998,~~pledged or ~~Eagle~~assigned ~~and~~a ~~Holdings~~security ~~filed~~interest ain ~~Registration~~substantially ~~Statement~~all onof ~~Form~~its ~~S-4~~assets to ~~offer~~secure topayment ~~exchange~~of (its indebtedness and other obligations under the ~~“Exchange~~Financing ~~Offer”)~~Agreement. upThe toCompany’s ~~$115~~principal stockholders,~~000,000~~ ofGE ~~its~~Investment 8Private Placement Partners II, L.~~75%~~P. ~~Notes~~(“GEI”) ~~due~~and ~~2008~~Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P. (“Warburg,” and together with GEI, the “~~Exchange~~Equity ~~Notes~~Sponsors”) ~~for~~, uphave toguaranteed ~~$115,000,000~~the payments of ~~its~~the ~~outstanding~~Revolver ~~Notes.~~B obligations and

~~Upon consummation~~49 of the Exchange Offer, the terms of the Exchange Notes were substantially identical in all respects to the term of the Notes. The Exchange Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior subordinated and unsecured basis by Holdings and all future Domestic Subsidiaries.

Annual principal payments for future maturities for the next five fiscal years consist of the following (in thousands):

2004	$	8,578
2005		50,956
2006		18,718
2007		—
2008		115,000
	$	193,252

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

associated costs (the “Guaranteed Obligations”). This guaranty is limited in amount to the lesser of (i) the aggregate amount of all interest paid to the Equity Sponsors after March 23, 2004 in respect of the Notes (as defined below) held by such Equity Sponsors and their affiliates and (ii) the aggregate amount of the outstanding Guaranteed Obligations.

The Company’s ability to meet the covenants in the Financing Agreement will be dependent upon the Company’s future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions and financial operations. There can be no assurance that the Company’s future performance will not be affected negatively by changes in the above factors to such a degree that it affects the Company’s ability to meet covenants in the Financing Agreement.

As of July 3, 2004, the Company had letters of credit outstanding totaling $1,664,000 under the Revolving Financing Facility, as required by certain insurance policies.

Senior Subordinated Notes

The Company’s $115,000,000 of Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Notes”) are due January 15, 2008 bearing interest of 8.75% per annum, payable on January 15 and July 15, commencing July 15, 1998. The fair market value of the Notes was approximately $80,500,000 and $78,200,000 at July 3, 2004 and June 28, 2003, respectively.

The Notes are unconditionally guaranteed by Holdings (the “Parent Guarantee”) and by each future Domestic Subsidiary of the Company (each, a “Domestic Subsidiary Guarantee” and, collectively, the “Domestic Subsidiary Guarantees”). The Company currently has no domestic subsidiaries and therefore none that guarantee the Notes. The Parent Guarantee and the Domestic Subsidiary Guarantees are joint and several as well as full and unconditional. The Notes are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company. The Notes include certain covenants including limitations on indebtedness, dividends and other payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries, subordinated liens, sale and leaseback transactions, sale or issuance of capital stock of subsidiaries, merger, consolidation or sale of assets, transactions with affiliates and layering debt. The indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, to declare or pay any dividend or make any distribution on or in respect of its capital stock except dividends or distributions payable solely in its capital stock (other than redeemable stock) and except dividends or distributions payable solely to the Company or any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Furthermore, Holdings’ ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries is restricted by the Notes because (1) Holdings may not hold assets other than Company capital stock and other minimal assets related to the business of holding such stock and (2) Holdings may not incur any additional liabilities other than in the ordinary course of business.

GEI and Warburg, Holdings’ principal stockholders, each owned $14,100,000 in aggregate principal amount of Notes as of September 9, 2004.

8. Income Taxes:

The Company ~~accounts~~assesses ~~for~~the recoverability ~~income~~of ~~taxes~~the indeferred ~~accordance~~tax ~~with~~assets ~~SFAS~~and ~~No.~~records ~~109,~~a ~~which~~valuation ~~requires~~allowance ~~the~~when ~~use~~it ofis ~~the~~probable ~~liability~~that ~~method.~~any ~~Under~~or ~~this~~all ~~method,~~of the deferred tax assets ~~and~~will ~~liabilities~~not ~~are~~be ~~recognized~~realized. ~~based~~The onCompany has experienced pretax losses over the ~~difference~~past ~~between~~few years, excluding the ~~financial~~gain ~~statement~~in fiscal ~~carrying~~year ~~amounts~~2002 on the ReaLemon Sale. Because of ~~existing~~these ~~assets~~factors, ~~and~~the ~~liabilities~~Company ~~and~~had ~~their~~recorded ~~respective~~a ~~tax~~$54,198,000 ~~bases.~~valuation ~~Deferred~~allowance for the net deferred tax assets and ~~liabilities~~net ~~are~~operating ~~measured~~loss ~~using~~carryforwards ~~enacted~~as ~~tax~~of July 3, 2004. Management continues to see ~~rates~~lower inindustry ~~effect~~market values in the ~~years~~current ineconomic environment, which ~~those~~could ~~temporary~~affect ~~differences~~the ~~are~~tax ~~expected~~planning strategies available to ~~reverse~~the Company. ~~Under~~The ~~SFAS~~Company ~~No.~~maintains ~~109,~~a ~~the~~full ~~effect~~valuation onallowance for its net deferred ~~taxes~~tax ofassets aand ~~change~~net inoperating ~~tax~~loss carryforwards ~~rates~~as issufficient ~~recognized~~positive inevidence ~~income~~does innot exist to support reversal of the ~~period~~reserve. ~~that~~Until ~~includes~~such time, except for minor state and local tax provisions, the ~~enactment~~Company ~~date~~will have no reported tax provision, net of valuation allowance adjustments.

The Company assesses the recoverability of the deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, which requires the recording of a valuation allowance when it is probable that any or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In absence of favorable economic factors, application of SFAS No. 109 requires a 100% valuation allowance for any net deferred tax assets when a company has cumulative financial accounting losses, excluding unusual items, over several years. The Company has experienced pretax losses over the past few years, excluding the gain in fiscal year 2002 on the ReaLemon Sale. Because of these factors, the Company had recorded a $33,167,000 valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards as of June 29, 2002. Management continues to see lower industry market values in the current economic environment, which could affect the tax planning strategies available to the Company. The Company intends to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of the reserve. Until such time, except for minor state and local tax provisions, the Company will have no reported tax provision, net of valuation allowance adjustments.

In determining the amount of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, the Company estimated the current tax deductibility of certain costs and charges, and evaluated the fair market value of the Company in comparison to the tax value. These estimates are subject to change. Any differences between these current estimates and actual values determined at a future date will result in a change to the valuation allowance and will be recorded at that date.

A50 ~~comparative analysis of the Company’s (expense) benefit for income taxes from earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change consisted of the following (in thousands):~~

	June 29, 2003			June 29, 2002			June 30, 2001
Federal	$	97		$	(824	)	$	2,721
State		(21	)		(110	)		141
Valuation allowance		—			(33,167	)		—
	$	76		$	(34,101	)	$	2,862

At June 28, 2003, the Company had $144,021,000 of accumulated net operating losses for financial statement purposes and $98,428,000 of accumulated net operating loss carryforwards for tax reporting purposes. The tax net operating losses expire, if unused, beginning in 2018. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards for foreign purposes are not material.

Reconciliation of the differences between income taxes computed at Federal statutory rates and the consolidated (expense) benefit for income taxes on earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change are as follows (in thousands):

	June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002			June 30, 2001
Income tax (expense) benefit computed at the Federal statutory tax rate	$	19,140		$	(848	)	$	2,781
State tax (expense) benefit, net of Federal tax benefits		1,060			(86	)		92
Valuation allowance		(20,124	)		(33,167	)		—
Other		—			—			(11	)
	$	76		$	(34,101	)	$	2,862

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

A comparative analysis of the Company’s (expense) benefit for income taxes from earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change consisted of the following (in thousands):


	July 3, 2004			June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002
Federal	$	—		$	97		$	(824	)
State		(73	)		(21	)		(110	)
Valuation allowance		—			—			(33,167	)

	$	(73	)	$	76		$	(34,101	)

At July 3, 2004, the Company had $133,495,000 of accumulated net operating loss carryforwards for tax reporting purposes. The tax net operating losses expire, if unused, beginning in 2018. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards for foreign purposes are not material.


	July 3, 2004			June 28, 2003			June 20, 2002
Income tax (expense) benefit computed at the Federal statutory tax rate	$	847		$	19,140		$	(848	)
State tax (expense) benefit, net of Federal tax benefits		(13	)		1,060			(86	)
Valuation allowance		(907	)		(20,124	)		(33,167	)

	$	(73	)	$	76		$	(34,101	)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 28, 2003

June 29, 2002

June 30, 2001

July 3,2004

June 28,2003

June 29,2002

Net operating loss carryforward

3649,~~418~~393

2936,~~470~~418

3429,~~095~~470

Intangible assets

142,~~890~~265

~~(989~~14,890

)

(~~196~~989

)

Property, plant and equipment

~~386~~609

~~2,052~~386

(2,~~478~~052

)

All other assets

1,~~842~~988

21,~~772~~842

2,~~851~~772

All other liabilities

(~~245~~57

)

(~~138~~245

)

(~~383~~138

)

Valuation allowance

(5354,~~291~~198

)

(3353,~~167~~291

)

—(33,167

)

Net deferred tax asset

—

~~33,889~~—

9. Supplemental Information:

Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 28, 2003		June 29, 2002
	July 3,2004		June 28,2003
Other accrued liabilities:
Customer allowances	$	2,~~741~~803	$	2,~~463~~741
Divestiture reserve		494		1,854
Insurance accruals		1,224		945
Coupon accrual		578		656
Divestiture reserve		—		494
Broker commissions		390		592
Coupon accrual		497		578
Compensation and related accruals		956		916
Broker commissions		326		390
Other		952		550
Compensation and related accruals		999		956
Total other accrued liabilities	$	6,111	$	7,031
Other		55		7
Total other accrued liabilities	$	5,904	$	6,111

~~10.~~51 ~~Redeemable Preferred Stock:~~

On September 24, 1999, 99 shares of Series B Non-Voting Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) were issued by Holdings at a stated value of $100,000 per share (the “Series B Stated Value”), and on January 23, 1998, 816,750 shares of Series A Non-Voting Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock” and together with the Series B Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”) were issued by Holdings at a stated value of $100 per share (the “Series A Stated Value”, and together with the Series B Stated Value, the “Stated Value”).

Together, the Preferred Stock ranks as to dividends and on liquidation on parity. The Preferred Stock provides for preferential cumulative dividends at the rate of 10% per share per annum of the Stated Value for each series of Preferred Stock. Dividends are payable as declared by the Holdings Board of Directors and shall be paid before any dividends shall be set apart for or paid upon the Common Stock of Holdings, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”). In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of shares of Preferred Stock are entitled to be paid out of the assets of Holdings available for distribution to its stockholders before any payment is made to the holders of stock junior to the Preferred Stock. Holders of Preferred Stock are not entitled to vote on any matters presented to the stockholders of Holdings. However, the affirmative vote or written consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of Preferred Stock is required to amend, alter or repeal the preferences, special rights or other powers of the Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at a price per share equal to the Stated Value for each series of Preferred Stock plus all dividends accrued and unpaid there upon (1) the closing of a public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, (2) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Holdings or the merger or consolidation of Holdings with or into any other corporation or other entity in which the holders of Holdings’ outstanding shares before the merger or consolidation do not retain a majority of the voting power of the surviving corporation or other entity or (3) the acquisition by any person of shares of Common Stock representing a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock then outstanding.

Cumulative accrued dividends totaled $60,952,000 and $46,936,000 at June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively. They are classified with Redeemable Preferred Stock in the consolidated balance sheet of Holdings.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

10. Redeemable Preferred Stock:

Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock rank on parity as to dividends and on liquidation. The Preferred Stock provides for preferential cumulative dividends at the rate of 10% per share per annum of the Stated Value for each series of Preferred Stock. Dividends are payable as declared by the Holdings Board of Directors and shall be paid before any dividends shall be set apart for or paid upon the Common Stock of Holdings, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”). In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of shares of Preferred Stock are entitled to be paid out of the assets of Holdings available for distribution to its stockholders before any payment is made to the holders of stock junior to the Preferred Stock. Holders of Preferred Stock are not entitled to vote on any matters presented to the stockholders of Holdings. However, the affirmative vote or written consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of Preferred Stock is required to amend, alter or repeal the preferences, special rights or other powers of the Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at a price per share equal to the Stated Value for each series of Preferred Stock plus all dividends accrued and unpaid there upon (1) the closing of a public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, (2) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Holdings or the merger or consolidation of Holdings with or into any other corporation or other entity in which the holders of Holdings’ outstanding shares before the merger or consolidation do not retain a majority of the voting power of the surviving corporation or other entity or (3) the acquisition by any person of shares of Common Stock representing a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock then outstanding.

Cumulative accrued dividends totaled $76,712,000 and $60,952,000 at July 3, 2004 and June 28, 2003, respectively. They are classified with Redeemable Preferred Stock in the consolidated balance sheet of the Company.

11. Stockholders and Registration Rights Agreements:

The Stockholders Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings and the stockholders named therein (the “Stockholders Agreement”) and the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 23, 1998, by and among Holdings and the investors named therein (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) were each amended as of September 27, 1999, to reflect a Subscription Agreement with GEI and Warburg (as described in Note 12) for the offer and sale of a total of 99 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and a total of 100,000 shares of Common Stock with accompanying warrants to purchase a total of 22,013 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”) . AsBecause ~~a result~~ of such amendments, all covenants and agreements set forth in the initial Stockholders Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement will apply to the newly issued Series B Preferred Stock, ~~Common Stock~~ and Common Stock ~~issuable upon exercise of the Warrants~~.

12. Stock Subscription Agreement:

On September 27, 1999, GEI and Warburg subscribed to purchase a total of 99 shares of Series B Preferred Stock at $100,000 per share and a total of 100,000 shares of Common Stock at $1 per share with accompanying Warrants to purchase up to 22,013 additional shares of Common Stock. The Warrants ~~may~~were beexercisable ~~exercised~~ for a purchase price of $1 per share of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) and only upon failure of the Company to achieve certain financial targets for the fiscal year 2000. The Warrants would have automatically terminated if the Company had achieved certain financial targets for fiscal year 2000. The Company did not meet the financial targets for fiscal year 2000. Therefore, pursuant to the terms of the Warrants, the Warrants ~~are~~expired ~~currently exercisable and expire~~ on September 27, 2004 without being exercised. Holdings received $10,000,000 in exchange for these securities. Upon completion of ~~the~~ the issuance of the Warrants, Holdings made a $10,000,000 capital contribution to Eagle.

~~Upon~~52 the separations of certain executive officers during fiscal year 2002 and pursuant to their employment agreement, the Company purchased into treasury 7,524 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for a value of $966,000.

Secured recourse promissory note, principal and interest, between the Company and one executive was satisfied in fiscal year 2002 by transferring the executive’s 2,475 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (included in the 7,524 treasury shares referenced above) to the Company.

13. Commitments and Contingencies:

Commitments. The Company may enter into long-term contracts for the purchase of certain raw materials. At June 28, 2003, the Company did not have any long-term purchase commitments.

The Company leases buildings and equipment under various noncancellable operating lease agreements for periods of one to five years. The lease agreements generally provide that the Company pays taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses related to the leased assets. Rent expense for fiscal year 2003, fiscal year 2002, and fiscal year 2001 totaled $393,000, $1,257,000 and $1,065,000, respectively.

At June 28, 2003, future minimum lease payments were as follows (in thousands):

2004	$	411
2005		75
2006		11
2007 and beyond		11
Total minimum lease payments	$	508

Employment Agreements. The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain key executives. Such agreements provide for annual salaries, bonuses and severances and include non-compete and non-solicitation provisions.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

Upon the separations of certain executive officers during fiscal year 2002 and pursuant to their employment agreements, the Company purchased into treasury 7,524 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for a value of $966,000.

13. Commitments and Contingencies:

The Company may enter into long-term contracts for the purchase of certain raw materials. At July 3, 2004, the Company did not have any long-term purchase commitments. The Company leases buildings and equipment under various non-cancelable lease agreements for periods of one to five years. The lease agreements generally require the Company to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses related to the leased assets.

The following table lists the Company’s commitments and contingencies at July 3, 2004 (dollars in thousands):


	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
Long-term debt obligations	$	115,000	$	—	$	—	$	115,000	$	—
Revolving financing obligations		70,688		70,688		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations		822		244		487		51		40
Purchase obligations		7,271		7,271		—		—		—

Total	$	193,781	$	78,203	$	487	$	115,051	$	40

The maturity date of the Revolving Financing Facility is March 23, 2007, but in accordance with EITF 95-22, the Company has presented the outstanding balance as a current obligation. See additional disclosure in Note 7 herein.

Employment Agreements. The Company has an employment agreement with the Chief Executive Officer and has employment arrangements with certain other key executives which provide for annual salaries, bonuses and severances and include non-compete and non-solicitation provisions.

14. Stock Options and Restricted Stock:

On January 14, 1998, Holdings’ Board of Directors adopted the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”). The Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock to officers, key employees, directors and consultants of the Company at the discretion of a committee of the Board of Directors. As amended on January 5, 2000, a total of 206,150 shares of common stock may be awarded under the Incentive Plan, subject to certain adjustments reflecting changes in Holdings’ capitalization.

Grants of options and the periods during which such options can be exercised, and grants of restricted stock and the periods during which such grants become unrestricted and vest are at the discretion of a committee. As of ~~June~~July 283, ~~2003~~2004, the committee has not granted any stock options.

The committee has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to Holdings’ officers and other key employees. Holders of the restricted stock are not entitled to (1) receive dividends until such shares vest or (2) vote their respective shares during the restricted period. The restricted stock vests in installments of 20% per year on each of the first five anniversaries of the issue date, provided that the recipient is employed by Holdings as of each such date. Additionally, the sale, transfer, pledge, exchange or disposal of restricted shares during the restricted period is not permitted except as otherwise allowed by the Holdings’ Stockholders Agreement.

A53 ~~summary of restricted stock transactions for the fiscal years 2001 and 2002 is as follows:~~

	Shares ofRestrictedStock		Fair MarketValue atIssuance Date
Outstanding at July 1, 2000	138,559		86,584
Granted	53,145		531
Outstanding at June 30, 2001	191,704		87,115
Cancelled	(106,522	)	(44,156	)
Outstanding at June 29, 2002	85,182		42,959
Cancelled	(300	)	(3	)
Outstanding at June 28, 2003	84,882		42,956

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued

A summary of restricted stock transactions for the fiscal years 2002, 2003, and 2004 is as follows:


	Shares of Restricted Stock		Fair Market Value at Issuance Date
Outstanding at June 30, 2001	191,704		$	87,115
Cancelled	(106,522	)		(44,156	)

Outstanding at June 29, 2002	85,182			42,959
Cancelled	(300	)		(3	)

Outstanding at June 28, 2003	84,882			42,956
Cancelled	(45,047	)		(37,771	)

Outstanding at July 3, 2004	39,835		$	5,185

Unearned compensation is charged for the fair value of the restricted shares granted and issued in accordance with the Incentive Plan. The unearned compensation is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ deficit in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of Holdings. Unearned compensation is amortized ratably over the restricted period.

15. Retirement Plan:

The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan. Participation in this plan is available to all employees who have completed certain minimum service requirements. Company contributions to this plan are based on a percentage of employees’ annual compensation. The costs of this plan were $~~340~~222,000, $~~373~~340,000, and $~~675~~373,000, for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004, fiscal year ~~2002~~2003, and fiscal year ~~2001~~2002, respectively.

16The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan covering all eligible union employees (“Benefit Plan”) and provides a defined benefit based on years of service. ~~Intercompany~~The ~~Receivable~~following tables present information about benefit obligations, plan assets, annual expense, net periodic benefit costs and other assumptions about the Company’s Benefit Plan as of December 31 for each respective year (in thousands):

Eagle lent Holdings, in the aggregate, $1,382,000 as a non-interest bearing loan to purchase into treasury certain shares of Series A Preferred Stock from certain former executives pursuant to their employment agreements.


	Twelve Months Ended
	December 31, 2003			December 31, 2002
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	321		$	237
Service cost		60			60
Interest cost		21			15
Experience losses		23			9

Benefit obligation at end of year	$	425		$	321

Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	237		$	171
Employer contribution		70			65
Benefits paid		(4	)		(1	)
Interest earned		1			2

Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	304		$	237

Weighted average assumptions
Discount rate		6.5	%		6.5	%
Expected rate of return		8.0	%		8.0	%

~~17. Other~~54 ~~Information:~~

GEITable and Warburg, Holdings’ principal stockholders, each owned $14,100,000 in aggregate principal amount of Notes as of August 18, 2003. Contents

57EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements – continued


	December 31, 2003			December 31, 2002			December 31, 2001
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	60		$	60		$	53
Interest cost		21			15			11
Expected return on plan assets		(16	)		(12	)		(7	)
Amortization of net (gain) loss		6			6			2

Net periodic benefit cost	$	71		$	69		$	59

The Company expensed $39,000 and $37,000 for the six months ended July 3, 2004 and June 28, 2003, respectively. The Company contributed $70,000 during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2003, including $52,500 paid during the fifty-three week period ended July 3, 2004. The Company anticipates contributing $90,000 to fund its Benefit Plan during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2004.

16. Comprehensive Income (Loss):

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the fifty-three week period ended July 3, 2004 and the fifty-two week periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	July 3, 2004			June 28, 2003			June 29, 2002
Net loss	$	(2,403	)	$	(54,606	)	$	(31,679	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in fair value of commodity contracts		176			37			(41	)
Recognition of interest expense		—			(121	)		(211	)
Deferred gain on commodity contracts sold		1,969			—			—
Recognition of realized gain on commodity contracts sold		(1,638	)		—			—
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(165	)		206			107

Comprehensive loss	$	(2,061	)	$	(54,484	)	$	(31,824	)

The Company sold 886 contracts for a gain of $1,969,000 prior to the contracts’ settlement dates. The gain will be recognized as the original contracts mature.

17. Subsequent Event:

On September 20, 2004, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Financing Agreement (the “First Amendment”) by and among Holdings, as guarantor, Eagle, as borrower, certain financial institutions from time to time party thereto, Fortress, as collateral agent for the Lenders, and Congress, as administrative agent for the Lenders. The First Amendment temporarily increases the principal amount available for borrowing under Revolver A from $27,000,000 to $30,000,000 through and including November 3, 2004.

Schedule II

Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc.

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(Dollars in thousands)


Description	Balance at beginning of period		Charged to costs and expenses	Deductions	Balance at end of period
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
For the year ended July 3, 2004	$	53,291	907	—	$	54,198
For the year ended June 28, 2003	$	33,167	20,124	—	$	53,291
For the year ended June 29, 2002	$	—	33,167	—	$	33,167

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

GEITable and Warburg, Holdings’ principal stockholders, each owned $14,100,000 in aggregate principal amount of Notes as of August 18, 2003. Contents

Filing Compare · EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS INC