UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

		OR

¨		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-6393

VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA INC.

A Pennsylvania Corporation

I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 23-0397860

1717 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Telephone Number (215) 466-9900

THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(2).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page


PART I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Condensed Statements of Income
	Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002	1

	Condensed Balance Sheets
	June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002	2

	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002	4

	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations	8

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	16

PART II	Other Information

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	17

Signatures		18

Exhibit Index		19

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Millions) (Unaudited)	2003			2002			2003			2002

Operating Revenues (including $58.7, $56.0, $114.9 and $119.5 from affiliates)	$	860.0		$	905.9		$	1,741.4		$	1,788.7


Operating Expenses (including $216.3, $179.6, $406.3 and $328.8 to affiliates)
Cost of services and sales (exclusive of items shown below)		256.7			219.8			515.4			455.0
Selling, general and administrative expense		252.9			242.3			430.6			409.5
Depreciation and amortization		197.6			221.6			397.2			439.8

Total Operating Expenses		707.2			683.7			1,343.2			1,304.3


Operating Income		152.8			222.2			398.2			484.4

Other income and (expense), net (including $.1, $(8.5), $.1 and $(32.4) from affiliates)		(17.7	)		(4.3	)		(17.1	)		(29.2	)

Interest expense (including $1.1, $.9, $2.3 and $1.5 to affiliate)		27.0			33.4			56.2			67.3


Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		108.1			184.5			324.9			387.9

Provision for income taxes		44.7			80.2			134.0			174.7


Income Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle		63.4			104.3			190.9			213.2

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax		—			—			176.0			—


Net Income	$	63.4		$	104.3		$	366.9		$	213.2

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

(Dollars in Millions)	June 30, 2003		December 31, 2002

	(Unaudited)
Current assets
Short-term investments	$	37.1	$	106.3
Accounts receivable:
Trade and other, net of allowances for uncollectibles of $199.7 and $187.4		549.4		601.7
Affiliates		90.3		88.2
Material and supplies		14.6		16.3
Prepaid expenses		74.5		49.8
Deferred income taxes		119.2		92.1
Other		102.0		96.9

		987.1		1,051.3

Plant, property and equipment		13,096.8		13,019.8
Less accumulated depreciation		8,286.1		8,333.3

		4,810.7		4,686.5

Intangible assets, net		101.7		114.9

Prepaid pension asset		727.3		650.6

Other assets		285.4		282.2

Total assets	$	6,912.2	$	6,785.5

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNER’S INVESTMENT

(Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amount)	June 30, 2003		December 31, 2002

	(Unaudited)
Current liabilities
Debt maturing within one year:
Note payable to affiliate	$	653.9	$	279.9
Other		.5		150.5
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Affiliates		188.6		231.7
Other		411.0		504.1
Other current liabilities		240.5		191.4

		1,494.5		1,357.6


Long-term debt		1,654.3		1,961.4


Employee benefit obligations		681.0		665.3


Deferred credits and other liabilities
Deferred income taxes		767.8		590.3
Unamortized investment tax credits		20.9		21.5
Other		194.3		188.9

		983.0		800.7


Shareowner’s investment
Common stock – $20 par value per share
Authorized shares: 80,210,000		1,594.7		1,594.7
Outstanding shares: 79,732,681
Contributed capital		221.4		221.4
Reinvested earnings		283.3		184.4

		2,099.4		2,000.5


Total liabilities and shareowner’s investment	$	6,912.2	$	6,785.5

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Millions) (Unaudited)	2003			2002

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	$	500.2		$	567.2


Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures (including capitalized network and non-network software)		(209.1	)		(333.1	)
Net change in short-term investments		69.2			74.3
Investment in unconsolidated business		—			(35.8	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(139.9	)		(294.6	)


Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Early extinguishment of debt		(325.0	)		(225.0	)
Principal repayments of borrowings and capital lease obligations		(150.3	)		(.2	)
Change in note payable to affiliate		374.0			102.8
Dividends paid		(268.0	)		(177.0	)
Capital contribution from parent		—			35.8
Net change in outstanding checks drawn on controlled disbursement accounts		9.0			(9.0	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(360.3	)		(272.6	)


Net change in cash		—			—

Cash, beginning of period		—			—


Cash, end of period	$	—		$	—

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon). The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared based upon Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules that permit reduced disclosure for interim periods. These financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations and financial position for the interim periods shown including normal recurring accruals. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The balance sheet at December 31, 2002 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For a more complete discussion of significant accounting policies and certain other information, you should refer to the financial statements included in our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have reclassified certain amounts from prior year’s data to conform to the 2003 presentation.

2. Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Stock-Based Compensation

We participate in employee compensation plans sponsored by Verizon with awards of Verizon common stock. Prior to 2003, Verizon accounted for stock-based employee compensation under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, and followed the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, no stock-based employee compensation expense for our fixed stock option plans is reflected in our 2002 net income as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

Effective January 1, 2003, Verizon adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, using the prospective method (as permitted under SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure”) to all new awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2003. Under the prospective method, employee compensation expense in the first year will be recognized for new awards granted, modified, or settled. The options generally vest over a term of three years, therefore the expenses related to stock-based employee compensation included in the determination of net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 are less than what would have been recorded if the fair value method was also applied to previously issued awards. The following table illustrates the effect on net income if the fair value method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested options in each period:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Millions)	2003		2002			2003			2002

Net income, as reported	$	63.4	$	104.3		$	366.9		$	213.2
Add: Stock option-related employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects		—		—			—			—
Deduct: Total stock option-related employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		—		(1.4	)		(.1	)		(2.8	)

Pro forma net income	$	63.4	$	102.9		$	366.8		$	210.4

After-tax compensation expense for other stock-based compensation included in net income as reported for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was not material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This standard provides the accounting for the cost of legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 requires that companies recognize the fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the obligations are incurred and capitalize that amount as part of the book value of the long-lived asset. We have determined that we do not have a material legal obligation to remove long-lived assets as described by this statement. However, prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 143, we included estimated removal costs in our group depreciation models. These costs have increased depreciation

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

expense and accumulated depreciation for future removal costs for existing assets. These removal costs were recorded as a reduction to accumulated depreciation when the assets were retired and removal costs were incurred.

For some assets, such as telephone poles, the removal costs exceeded salvage value. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 143, we are required to exclude costs of removal from our depreciation rates for assets for which the removal costs exceed salvage. Accordingly, in connection with the initial adoption of this standard on January 1, 2003, we have reversed accrued costs of removal in excess of salvage from our accumulated depreciation accounts for these assets. The adjustment was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, resulting in the recognition of a gain of $300.8 million ($176.0 million after-tax). Effective January 1, 2003, we began expensing costs of removal in excess of salvage for these assets as incurred. The ongoing impact of this change in accounting resulted in a decrease in depreciation expense and an increase in cost of services and sales, which was not material to our total operating expenses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003.

Debt Extinguishment

In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” SFAS No. 145, among other things, eliminates the requirement that all gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt must be classified as extraordinary items on the income statement, thereby permitting the classification of such gains and losses as extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions.” We adopted this provision of SFAS No. 145 effective January 1, 2003 and, upon adoption, reclassified the losses on the early extinguishment of debt and related tax benefits that were previously reported in our statements of income as extraordinary items to Other expense and Provision for income taxes.

3. Dividend

On August 1, 2003, we declared and paid a dividend in the amount of $185.0 million to our parent, Verizon.

4. Debt

On June 30, 2003, we redeemed the entire outstanding principal amount of our $225.0 million 7 3/8% debentures due on March 15, 2033 and $100.0 million 7.70% debentures due on January 15, 2023. We recorded a loss of $18.1 million to other income and (expense), net as a result of these redemptions.

On March 15, 2003, $150.0 million 6 1/8% debentures matured.

On March 1, 2002, we redeemed the entire outstanding principal amount of our $50.0 million 4 3/8% debentures due on February 1, 2003, $100.0 million 6 3/4% debentures due on May 1, 2008 and $75.0 million 7 1/8% debentures due on January 1, 2012. We recorded a loss of $1.5 million to other income and (expense), net as a result of these redemptions.

5. Shareowner’s Investment

(Dollars in Millions)	Common Stock		Contributed Capital		Reinvested Earnings

Balance at December 31, 2002	$	1,594.7	$	221.4	$	184.4
Net income						366.9
Dividends declared						(268.0	)

Balance at June 30, 2003	$	1,594.7	$	221.4	$	283.3

Net income and comprehensive income were the same for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

6. Employee Severance and Other Benefit Costs

We maintain ongoing severance plans for both management and associate employees, which provide benefits to employees that are terminated. The costs for these plans are accounted for under SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.” We accrue for severance benefits based on the terms of our severance plan over the estimated service periods of the employees. The accruals are also based on the historical run-rate of actual severances and expectations for future severances. From time to time, because Verizon’s severance programs are implemented across its subsidiaries, Verizon must redistribute the amount of severance liability based on actual experience at the companies.

In the fourth quarter of 2001, it was determined that our severance liability was not sufficient as a result of new downsizing plans and we recorded a special charge of $76.6 million. In the second quarters of 2002 and 2003, again, it was determined that the severance liability was not sufficient because of further downsizing plans and we recorded special charges of $21.5 million and $10.8 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2003, approximately 1,770 employees have been separated under the 2001, 2002 and 2003 severance programs. Nearly all of the separations under the 2001 and 2002 severance activity have occurred. As of June 30, 2003, our severance liability was $76.3 million, which includes future payments to employees previously separated under the 2001, 2002 and 2003 severance programs. During the first six months of 2003, the company’s severance liability was increased by $23.1 million for special charges, the redistribution of severance liabilities across Verizon’s subsidiaries and ongoing severance costs and decreased by $15.1 million for payments. Severance costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in our statements of income. We continually evaluate employee levels, and accordingly, we may incur future severance costs.

In addition, we recorded special charges of $28.4 million in the second quarter of 2003 in connection with pension enhancements and estimated costs associated with the July 10, 2003 arbitration ruling. On July 10, 2003, an arbitrator ruled that Verizon-New York’s termination of approximately 2,300 employees in 2002 was not permitted under a union contract; similar cases were pending impacting an additional 1,100 employees in other Verizon subsidiaries, including the company. We offered to reinstate approximately 250 of the company’s impacted employees, and accordingly, we recorded a charge in the second quarter of 2003 representing estimated payments to employees and other related company-paid costs. In the second quarter of 2002, we recorded a special charge of $8.9 million in connection with pension enhancements and we recorded a pension settlement gain of $33.5 million as lump-sum payments exceeded the threshold of service and interest costs. The special termination benefits and settlement of pension obligations are recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits.” Special termination benefits and settlement of pension obligations are included in selling, general and administrative expense in our statements of income.

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Various legal actions and regulatory proceedings are pending to which we are a party and claims which, if asserted, may lead to other legal actions. We have established reserves for specific liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal matters, including environmental matters that we currently deem to be probable and estimable. We do not expect that the ultimate resolution of pending regulatory and legal matters in future periods will have a material effect on our financial condition, but it could have a material effect on our results of operations.

From time to time, regulatory decisions require us to assure customers that we will provide a level of service performance that falls within prescribed parameters. There are penalties associated with failing to meet those service parameters and we, from time to time, pay such penalties. We do not expect these penalties to have a material effect on our financial condition, but they could have a material effect on our results of operations.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations

(Abbreviated pursuant to General Instruction H(2).)

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Financial Statements and Condensed Notes to Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We reported net income of $366.9 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2003, compared to net income of $213.2 million for the same period in 2002. Our reported results included the following special items:

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This standard provides the accounting for the cost of legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 requires that companies recognize the fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the obligations are incurred and capitalize that amount as part of the book value of the long-lived asset. We have determined that we do not have a material legal obligation to remove long-lived assets as described by this statement. However, prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 143, we included estimated removal costs in our group depreciation models. These costs have increased depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation for future removal costs for existing assets. These removal costs were recorded as a reduction to accumulated depreciation when the assets were retired and removal costs were incurred.

Employee Severance and Other Benefit Costs

We maintain ongoing severance plans for both management and associate employees, which provide benefits to employees that are terminated. In the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, we recorded severance costs of $10.8 million and $21.5 million, respectively. Severance costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in our statements of income.

In addition, we recorded special charges of $28.4 million in the second quarter of 2003 in connection with pension enhancements and estimated costs associated with the July 10, 2003 arbitration ruling. On July 10, 2003, an arbitrator ruled that Verizon-New York’s termination of approximately 2,300 employees in 2002 was not permitted under a union contract; similar cases were pending impacting an additional 1,100 employees in other Verizon subsidiaries, including the company. We offered to reinstate approximately 250 of the company’s impacted employees, and accordingly, we recorded a charge in the second quarter of 2003 representing estimated payments to employees and other related company-paid costs. In the second quarter of 2002, we recorded a special charge of $8.9 million in connection with pension enhancements and we recorded a pension settlement gain of $33.5 million as lump-sum payments exceeded the threshold of service and interest costs. Special termination benefits and settlement of pension obligations are included in selling, general and administrative expense in our statements of income.

See Note 6 to the condensed financial statements for additional information.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

These and other items affecting the comparison of our results of operations for the six month periods ending June 30, 2003 and 2002 are discussed in the following sections.

OPERATING REVENUES

(Dollars in Millions)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2003		2002

Local services	$	919.6	$	955.9
Network access services		634.9		632.1
Long distance services		97.3		101.5
Other services		89.6		99.2

Total	$	1,741.4	$	1,788.7

LOCAL SERVICES

2003-2002	(Decrease)

Six Months	$	(36.3) (3.8)%

Local service revenues are earned from the provision of local exchange, local private line, wire maintenance, voice messaging and value-added services. Value-added services are a family of services that expand the utilization of the network, including products such as Caller ID, Call Waiting and Return Call. The provision of local exchange services not only includes retail revenues, but also includes local wholesale revenues from unbundled network elements (UNEs), interconnection revenues from competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), certain data transport revenues and wireless interconnection revenues.

Local service revenues declined in the first six months of 2003 primarily due to lower demand and usage of our basic local wireline services. The effects of mandated price reductions on UNEs, technology substitution from wireless services and the lagging economy largely drove the decline in local service revenue growth, as reflected by a decline in switched access lines in service of 5.4% from a year ago. Regulatory pricing rules for UNEs are shifting the mix of access lines from retail to wholesale resulting in more competition for local exchange services. These decreases were partially offset by the effect of higher billings to CLECs for the purchase of UNEs and for interconnection of their network with our network and by increased sales of packaged wireline services as a result of expanded new products and pricing plans.

NETWORK ACCESS SERVICES

2003-2002	Increase

Six Months	$	2.8 .4%

Network access service revenues are earned from end-user subscribers and from long distance and other competing carriers who use our local exchange facilities to provide usage services to their customers. Switched access revenues are derived from fixed and usage-based charges paid by carriers for access to our local network. Special access revenues originate from carriers and end-users that buy dedicated local exchange capacity to support their private networks. End-user access revenues are earned from our customers and from resellers who purchase dial-tone services, including digital subscriber lines (DSL).

The increase in network access revenues in the first six months of 2003 was mainly attributable to higher customer demand for data transport services (primarily special access services and DSL). Special access revenue growth reflects continuing demand in the business market for high-capacity, high-speed digital services, offset by lessening demand for older, low-speed data products and services. This increase was substantially offset by declines in switched minutes of use and switched access lines of 12.6% and 5.4%, respectively, from June 30, 2002, reflecting the impact of the soft economy and wireless substitution.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

LONG DISTANCE SERVICES

2003-2002		(Decrease)

Six Months		$(4.2) (4.1)%

Long distance revenues are earned primarily from calls made to points outside a customer’s local calling area, but within our service area (intraLATA toll). IntraLATA toll calls originate and terminate within the same LATA, but generally cover a greater distance than a local call. These services are regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PPUC) except where they cross state lines. Other long distance services that we provide include 800 services, Wide Area Telephone Service (WATS), and corridor services (between LATAs in Philadelphia and southern New Jersey). We also earn revenue from private line and operator services associated with long distance calls.

Long distance service revenues declined in the first six months of 2003 primarily due to the effects of competition, technology substitution and lower access line growth due to the soft economy. These factors were partially offset by increased sales of packaged wireline services which include expanded product offerings and pricing plans, resulting in customer win-backs.

OTHER SERVICES

2003-2002		(Decrease)

Six Months		$(9.6) (9.7)%

Our other services include such services as billing and collections for long distance carriers and affiliates, facilities rentals to affiliates and nonaffiliates, public (pay) telephone, customer premises equipment (CPE) and sales of materials and supplies to affiliates. Other service revenues also include fees paid by customers for nonpublication of telephone numbers, multiple white page listings and late payment of bills, and fees paid by an affiliate for usage of our directory listings.

Other service revenues declined in the first six months of 2003 primarily due to a decrease in revenue from affiliate sales and services.

OPERATING EXPENSES

(Dollars in Millions)

COST OF SERVICES AND SALES

2003-2002		Increase

Six Months		$60.4 13.3%

Cost of services and sales includes the following costs directly attributable to a service or product: salaries and wages, benefits, materials and supplies, contracted services, network access and transport costs, customer provisioning costs, computer systems support and cost of products sold. Aggregate customer care costs, which include billing and service provisioning, are allocated between cost of services and sales and selling, general and administrative expense.

The increase in cost of services and sales in the first six months of 2003 was mainly driven by lower net pension and other post-retirement benefit income and higher costs allocated from affiliates. The company participates in Verizon Communications Inc.’s (Verizon) defined pension plan and postretirement healthcare and life insurance plans. As of December 31, 2002, Verizon changed key employee benefit plan assumptions in response to current conditions in the securities markets and medical and prescription drug costs trends. The expected rate of return on pension plan assets has been changed from 9.25% in 2002 to 8.50% in 2003 and the expected rate of return on other postretirement benefit plan assets has been changed from 9.10% in 2002 to 8.50% in 2003. The discount rate assumption has been lowered from 7.25% in 2002 to 6.75% in 2003 and the medical cost trend rate assumption has been increased from 10.00% in 2002 to 11.00% in 2003. For the six month period ended June 30, 2003, the company recorded pension income, net of postretirement benefit expenses (after consideration of capitalized costs) of $56.6 million, compared to $106.9 million for the same period in 2002.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

These cost increases were partially offset by lower access and transport costs. As part of our ongoing review of local interconnection expense charged by CLECs, we determined that selected charges from CLECs, previously recorded as expense but not paid, were no longer required and, accordingly, we adjusted our first quarter 2003 operating expenses. In addition, we recognize as local interconnection expense no more than the amount payable under the April 27, 2001 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) order addressing intercarrier compensation for dial-up connections for Internet-bound traffic.

See “Other Matters – Compensation for Internet Traffic” for additional information on FCC rulemakings and other court decisions addressing intercarrier compensation for dial-up connections for Internet-bound traffic.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE

2003-2002		Increase

Six Months		$21.1 5.2%

Selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A) includes salaries and wages and benefits not directly attributable to a service or product, bad debt charges, taxes other than income, advertising and sales commission costs, customer billing, call center and information technology costs, professional service fees, and rent for administrative space. Aggregate customer care costs, which include billing and service provisioning, are allocated between cost of services and sales and selling, general and administrative expense.

The increase in SG&A expense in the first six months of 2003 was primarily driven by higher general and administrative costs allocated from affiliates. In addition, SG&A expense increased due to the effect of a pension settlement gain recorded in the second quarter of 2002 and by higher charges in connection with pension enhancements and other employee benefit expenses. These increases were partially offset by lower bad debt expense principally due to a reduction in uncollectible accounts receivable, improved collections and additional customer deposit requirements. In the second quarter of 2002, we recorded an impairment charge of $53.6 million driven by our financial statement exposure to WorldCom. Gross receipts and property taxes also were lower in the first six months of 2003, as compared to the same period last year.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

2003-2002		(Decrease)

Six Months		$(42.6) (9.7)%

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased principally due to the effect of lower rates of depreciation, as well as the favorable impact of adopting SFAS No. 143, effective January 1, 2003. Under SFAS No. 143, we began expensing costs of removal in excess of salvage for outside plant assets as incurred. Previously, we had included costs of removal for these assets in our depreciation rates. These decreases were partially offset by growth in depreciable telephone plant.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

OTHER RESULTS

(Dollars in Millions)

OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE), NET

	Six Months Ended June 30,						% Change
	2003			2002			% Change

Interest income	$	.9		$	4.3		(79.1	)%
Equity loss		—			(32.6	)	100.0
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(18.1	)		(1.5	)	nm
Other, net		.1			.6		(83.3	)

Total	$	(17.1	)	$	(29.2	)	41.4

nm — Not meaningful

The increase in other income and (expense), net was primarily attributable to the effect of equity losses recognized in the first six months of 2002 from our investment in Verizon Ventures III Inc. (Ventures III), an affiliated company. As a result of the reintegration of Ventures III completed on June 1, 2002, we no longer recognize equity income (loss) from this investment. This increase was partially offset by higher losses on the early extinguishment of debt.

INTEREST EXPENSE

	Six Months Ended June 30,				% Change
	2003		2002		% Change

Interest expense	$	56.2	$	67.3	(16.5	)%
Capitalized interest costs		3.8		3.4	11.8

Total interest costs on debt balances	$	60.0	$	70.7	(15.1	)

Debt outstanding	$	2,308.7	$	2,321.0	(.5	)%

Interest expense decreased in the first six months of 2003, over the same period in 2002, primarily due to changes in the mix of short- and long-term interest rates and changes in the levels of debt during each period.

See Note 4 to the condensed financial statements for additional information.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

	Six Months Ended June 30,						% Change
	2003			2002			% Change

Provision for income taxes	$	134.0		$	174.7		(23.3	)%
Effective income tax rate		41.2	%		45.0	%

The effective income tax rate is the provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. Our effective income tax rate was lower for the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared to the same period in 2002, primarily due to the effect of equity losses associated with our investment in Ventures III, which were recorded in the first six months of 2002, for which we did not recognize income tax benefits.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

OTHER MATTERS

In-Region Long Distance

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act), our ability to offer in-region long distance services (that is, services originating in the state where we operate as a local exchange carrier) was largely dependent on satisfying specified requirements. The requirements included a 14-point “competitive checklist” of steps which we must take to help competitors offer local services through resale, through purchase of UNEs, or by interconnecting their own networks to ours. We were required to demonstrate to the FCC that entry into the in-region long distance market would be in the public interest.

On September 19, 2001, the FCC released an order approving our application for permission to enter the in-region long distance market in Pennsylvania. In the second quarter of 2003, the appeal of the order granting our application has been resolved in our favor and withdrawn. Since October 23, 2001, in-region long distance service is being offered by a separate non-regulated subsidiary of Verizon as required by law.

FCC Regulation and Interstate Rates

We are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC with respect to interstate services and related matters. In 2002, the FCC continued to implement reforms to the interstate access charge system and to implement the “universal service” and other requirements of the 1996 Act.

Access Charges and Universal Service

On May 31, 2000, the FCC adopted the Coalition for Affordable Local and Long Distance Services (CALLS) plan as a comprehensive five-year plan for regulation of interstate access charges. The CALLS plan has three main components. First, it establishes a portable interstate access universal service support of $650 million for the industry. This explicit support replaces implicit support embedded in interstate access charges. Second, the plan simplifies the patchwork of common line charges into one subscriber line charge (SLC) and provides for de-averaging of the SLC by zones and class of customers in a manner that will not undermine comparable and affordable universal service. Third, the plan sets into place a mechanism to transition to a set target of $0.0055 per minute for switched access services. Once that target rate is reached, local exchange carriers are no longer required to make further annual price cap reductions to their switched access prices. The annual reductions leading to the target rate, as well as annual reductions for the subset of special access services that remain subject to price cap regulation was set at 6.5% per year.

On September 10, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled on an appeal of the FCC order adopting the plan. The court upheld the FCC on several challenges to the order, but remanded two aspects of the decision back to the FCC on the grounds that they lacked sufficient justification. The court remanded back to the FCC for further consideration its decision setting the annual reduction factor at 6.5% minus an inflation factor and the size of the new universal service fund at $650 million. The entire plan continued in effect pending the FCC’s further consideration of its justification of these components. On July 10, 2003, the FCC released an order on remand reaffirming these aspects of its plan. As a result of tariff adjustments which became effective in July 2003, we reached the $0.0055 benchmark.

The FCC has adopted rules for special access services that provide for pricing flexibility and ultimately the removal of services from price regulation when prescribed competitive thresholds are met. In order to use these rules, carriers must forego the ability to take advantage of provisions in the current rules that provide relief in the event earnings fall below prescribed thresholds. Verizon has been authorized to remove special access and dedicated transport services from price caps in 56 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). In addition, the FCC has found that in 24 MSAs Verizon has met the stricter standards to remove special access connections to end-user customers from price caps.

In November 1999, the FCC adopted a new mechanism for providing universal service support to high cost areas served by large local telephone companies. This funding mechanism provides additional support for local telephone services in several states served by Verizon’s telephone operations. This system has been supplemented by the new FCC access charge plan described above. On July 31, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed and remanded to the FCC for further proceedings. The court concluded that the FCC had failed to adequately explain some aspects of its decision and had failed to address any need for a state universal service mechanism. The current universal service mechanism remains in place pending the outcome of any FCC review as a result of these appeals. The FCC also has proceedings underway to evaluate

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

possible changes to its current rules for assessing contributions to the universal service fund. Any change in the current assessment mechanism could result in a change in the contribution that local telephone companies must make and that would have to be collected from customers.

Unbundling of Network Elements

In November 1999, the FCC announced its decision setting forth new unbundling requirements, eliminating elements that it had previously required to be unbundled, limiting the obligation to provide others and adding new elements.

In addition to the unbundling requirements released in November 1999, the FCC released an order in a separate proceeding in December 1999, requiring incumbent local exchange companies also to unbundle and provide to competitors the higher frequency portion of their local loop. This provides competitors with the ability to provision data services on top of incumbent carriers’ voice services.

On May 24, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit released an order that overturned the most recent FCC decision establishing which network elements were required to be unbundled. In particular, the court found that the FCC did not adequately consider the limitations of the “necessary and impair” standards of the 1996 Act when it chose national rules for unbundling and that it failed to consider the relevance of competition from other types of service providers, including cable and satellite. The court also vacated a separate order that had authorized an unbundling requirement for “line sharing” where a competing carrier purchases only a portion of the copper connection to the end-user in order to provide high-speed broadband services using DSL technology. The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently declined to review that decision.

On October 25, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit released an order upholding the FCC’s decisions that established interim limits on the availability of combinations of UNEs known as enhanced extended links or “EELs.” EELs consist of unbundled loops and transport elements. The FCC decisions limited access to EELs to carriers that would use them to provide a significant amount of local traffic, and not just use them as substitutes for special access services.

Prior to the issuance of these orders from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the FCC had already begun a review of the scope of its unbundling requirement through a rulemaking referred to as the triennial review of UNEs. This rulemaking reopened the question of what network elements must be made available on an unbundled basis under the 1996 Act, and will address the impact of the order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturning its previous rules, as well as other pending issues relating to unbundled elements, including the question of whether competing carriers may substitute combinations of unbundled loops and transport for already competitive special access services. On February 20, 2003, the FCC announced a decision in its triennial review, but the order has not yet been released.

Compensation for Internet Traffic

On April 27, 2001, the FCC released an order addressing intercarrier compensation for dial-up connections for Internet-bound traffic. The FCC found that Internet-bound traffic is interstate and subject to the FCC’s jurisdiction. Moreover, the FCC again found that Internet-bound traffic is not subject to reciprocal compensation under Section 251(b)(5) of the 1996 Act. Instead, the FCC established federal rates per minute for this traffic that decline from $0.0015 to $0.0007 over a three-year period. The FCC order also sets caps on the total minutes of this traffic that may be subject to any intercarrier compensation and requires that incumbent local exchange carriers must offer to both bill and pay reciprocal compensation for local traffic at the same rate as they are required to pay on Internet-bound traffic. On May 3, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected part of the FCC’s rationale for its April 27, 2001 order, but declined to vacate the order while it is on remand.

Several parties requested rehearing, asking the court to vacate the underlying order. Those requests were denied in a series of orders released on September 24, 2002 and September 25, 2002. The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review that denial. In the meantime, pending further action by the FCC, the FCC’s underlying order remains in effect.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

State Regulation of Rates and Services

In May 2002, the PPUC found that the Alternative Regulation Plan required us to deploy a broadband network capable of providing 45 megabits per second service within 5 days of a customer request. We requested reconsideration of this ruling and filed a petition to clarify our network deployment commitments. In March 2003, an Administrative Law Judge recommended that our network modernization plan be amended to require us to deploy a broadband network capable of providing services at 1.544 megabits per second within 5 days of request, and 45 megabits per second within a commercially reasonable time frame, by 2010. We excepted to this decision. In July 2003, the PPUC adopted a motion clarifying that we are required to deploy a broadband capable network by 2015 – 1.544 megabits per second within 5 days of the request, and 45 megabits per second within a commercially reasonable timeframe – and setting interim targets for deployment. Specifics of the PPUC approved network modernization plan will be contained in a written order which is expected in August 2003.

Collective Bargaining Agreement

Associate employees wages, pension and other benefits are determined under contract with unions representing our associate employees. Approximately 86% of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. On August 2, 2003, the collective bargaining agreement with the unions representing our employees expired. As of 8:00 a.m. on August 12, 2003, those employees have worked without a new contract since the previous contract expired and we continued to negotiate a new agreement with the unions. Once a proposed settlement is reached, it is subject to ratification by the unions’ members.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, that ensure that information relating to the registrant which is required to be disclosed in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within required time periods. They have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report was being prepared.

(b)

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this quarterly report, nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in these controls requiring corrective actions.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)	Exhibits:

	Exhibit Number

	12	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32	Officer Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b)	There were no Current Reports on Form 8-K filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

Date:	August 12, 2003	By:	/s/ EDWIN F. HALL
			Edwin F. Hall Controller

UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL INFORMATION IS AS OF AUGUST 7, 2003.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number

12		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32		Officer Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA INC 10-Q