UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to _______________

Commission File No. 0-50529

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Federal		56-2423720
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization )		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number )

3723 Glenmore Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45211
(Address of principal executive office)

Federal			56-2423720
(State or other jurisdiction of			(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)			Identification Number)

3723 Glenmore Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45211 (Address of principal executive office)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (513) 661-0457

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant ishas asubmitted ~~large~~electronically ~~accelerated~~and ~~filer,~~posted anon ~~accelerated~~its ~~filer~~corporate Web site, orif aany, ~~non-accelerated~~every ~~filer. See~~Interactive ~~definition~~Data ofFile ~~“accelerated~~required ~~filer~~to ~~and~~be ~~large~~submitted ~~accelerated~~and ~~filer”~~posted inpursuant to Rule ~~12b-2~~405 of Regulation S-T during the ~~Exchange~~preceding ~~Act.~~ 12 months (~~Check~~or ~~one.~~for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

~~Large~~Yes ~~accelerated~~x No ~~filer~~ o ~~Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Small business issuer x~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one.)

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of ~~May~~August 12, 2011, the latest practicable date, 8,~~864~~861,~~908~~110 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, were issued and outstanding.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Page 1 of 46

INDEX

			Page
PART I	-–	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
		Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	3
		Consolidated Statements of Earnings	4
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	5
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8
		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3233
		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4043
		Controls and Procedures	4043
PART II	-–	OTHER INFORMATION	4144
SIGNATURES			4246

Cheviot Financial Corp.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(In thousands, except share data)

ASSETS	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	June 30,			December 31,
ASSETS	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)
Cash and due from banks	$	58,~~505~~006		$	5,776
Federal funds sold		516,~~229~~573			5,924
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions		129,~~944~~421			6,449
Cash and cash equivalents		2334,~~678~~000			18,149
Investment securities available for sale – at fair value		99,523			88,382
Investment securities available for sale - at fair value		88,016			88,382
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale - at fair value		8,~~609~~358			4,279
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity - at cost, approximate market value of $5,128 and $4,916 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		4,619			4,779
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity - at cost, approximate market value of $4,633 and $4,916 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		4,488			4,779
Loans receivable - net		~~409~~406,~~230~~699			220,998
Loans held for sale - at lower of cost or market		~~5,148~~954			4,440
Real estate acquired through foreclosure - net		43,~~519~~682			2,007
Office premises and equipment - at depreciated cost		9,~~569~~995			4,610
Federal Home Loan Bank stock - at cost		8,366			3,375
Accrued interest receivable on loans		1,~~784~~754			925
Accrued interest receivable on mortgage-backed securities		3735			23
Accrued interest receivable on investments and interest-earning deposits		~~463~~480			392
Goodwill		10,~~244~~309			-
Core deposit intangible		1,298			-
Core deposit intangible - net		1,208			-
Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,~~731~~073			1,510
Bank-owned life insurance		10,~~079~~163			3,791
Prepaid federal income taxes		~~749~~1,001			409
Deferred federal income taxes		43,~~790~~547			-
Total assets	$	~~607~~597,~~436~~128		$	358,069
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits	$	~~481~~474,~~052~~888		$	257,852
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		4644,~~997~~245			27,300
Other borrowings		~~1,490~~35			-
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		21,~~217~~146			1,440
Accrued interest payable		~~195~~179			99
Accounts payable and other liabilities		5,~~725~~295			1,955
Deferred federal income taxes		-			4
Total liabilities		~~537~~525,~~676~~788			288,650
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock - authorized 5,000,000 shares, $.01 par value; none issued		-			-
Common stock - authorized 30,000,000 shares, $.01 par value; 9,918,751 shares issued at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010		99			99
Common stock - authorized 30,000,000 shares, $.01 par value; 9,918,751 shares issued at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		99			99
Additional paid-in capital		43,~~875~~873			43,878
Shares acquired by stock benefit plans		(1,~~302~~270	)		(1,302	)
Treasury stock - at cost, 1,053,843 shares at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010		(12,859	)		(12,860	)
Treasury stock - at cost, 1,053,843 shares at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		(12,859	)		(12,860	)
Retained earnings - restricted		4041,~~798~~294			40,655
Accumulated comprehensive loss, unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of related tax benefits		(851	)		(1,051	)
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss), unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of related tax effects		203			(1,051	)
Total shareholders’ equity		6971,~~760~~340			69,419
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	~~607~~597,~~436~~128		$	358,069

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS ~~(UNAUDITED)~~

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

(In thousands, except per share data)

	2011			2010
	Six months ended						Three months ended
Interest income
	June 30,						June 30,
Loans	$	3,390		$	3,508
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Mortgage-backed securities		50			86
	(Unaudited)
Investment securities		457			373
Interest income
Interest-earning deposits and other		50			40
Loans	$	8,853		$	6,913		$	5,463		$	3,405
Total interest income		3,947			4,007
Mortgage-backed securities		137			162			87			76
Interest expense
Investment securities		1,033			848			576			475
Deposits		926			915
Interest-earning deposits and other		137			77			86			37
Borrowings		279			366
Total interest income		10,160			8,000			6,212			3,993
Total interest expense		1,205			1,281
Interest expense
Net interest income		2,742			2,726
Deposits		2,217			1,784			1,291			869
Provision for losses on loans		150			40
Borrowings		615			718			335			352
Net interest income after provision for
Total interest expense		2,832			2,502			1,626			1,221
losses on loans		2,592			2,686
Net interest income		7,328			5,498			4,586			2,772
Other income
Provision for losses on loans		200			100			50			60
Rental		20			16
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		7,128			5,398			4,536			2,712
Loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		(12	)		-
Other income (expense)
Gain on sale of loans		46			36
Rental		58			32			38			16
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		39			35
Gain on sale of loans		226			82			180			46
Other operating		167			95
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		122			(22	)		135			(22	)
Total other income		260			182
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		124			69			84			35
General, administrative and other expense
Other operating		657			208			490			112
Employee compensation and benefits		1,135			1,160
Total other income		1,187			369			927			187
Occupancy and equipment		162			164
General, administrative and other expense
Property, payroll and other taxes		278			245
Employee compensation and benefits		3,122			2,251			1,988			1,091
Data processing		79			61
Occupancy and equipment		535			323			373			159
Legal and professional		223			129
Property, payroll and other taxes		598			499			320			254
Advertising		77			50
Data processing		219			112			140			51
FDIC expense		127			71
Legal and professional		542			236			319			107
Other operating		219			218
Advertising		280			100			203			50
Total general, administrative and other expense		2,300			2,098
FDIC expense		305			147			178			76
Earnings before federal income taxes		552			770
Other operating		969			396			749			178
Federal income taxes
Total general, administrative and other expense		6,570			4,064			4,270			1,966
Current		166			302
Earnings before income taxes		1,745			1,703			1,193			933
Deferred		(166	)		(35	)
Federal income taxes
Total federal income taxes		-			267
Current		(411	)		531			(438	)		229
NET EARNINGS	$	552		$	503
Deferred		701			91			728			126
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Total federal income taxes		290			622			290			355
Basic	$	.06		$	.06
NET EARNINGS	$	1,455		$	1,081		$	903		$	578
Diluted	$	.06		$	.06
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Dividends declared per share	$	.12		$	.11
Basic	$	.17		$	.12		$	.10		$	.06
Diluted	$	.17		$	.12		$	.10		$	.06
Dividends per common share	$	.24		$	.22		$	.12		$	.11

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ~~(UNAUDITED)~~

For the six and three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

(In thousands)

	2011			2010
	For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended June 30,
Net earnings for the period	$	552		$	503
	2011			2010			2011		2010
Other comprehensive income, net of related tax expense:
	(Unaudited)
Unrealized holding gains on securities during the period, net of tax expense of $103 and $86 for the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively		200			167
Net earnings for the period	$	1,455		$	1,081		$	903	$	578
Comprehensive income	$	752		$	670
Other comprehensive income, net of tax expense:
Accumulated comprehensive loss	$	(851	)	$	(213	)
Unrealized holding gains on securities during the period, net of tax expense of $646 and $317 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $543 and $231 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively		1,254			615			1,054		448
Comprehensive income	$	2,709		$	1,696		$	1,957	$	1,026
Accumulated comprehensive income	$	203		$	235		$	203	$	235

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS ~~(UNAUDITED)~~

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

(In thousands)

	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings for the period	$	~~552~~1,455		$	~~503~~1,081
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment and mortgage-backed securities, net		5(8	)		1019
Depreciation		69219			80158
Amortization of deferred loan origination costs (fees) - net		55			(3	)
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees - net		59			(4	)
Proceeds from sale of loans in the secondary market		9,524			2,756
Amortization of intangible assets		90			-
Loans originated for sale in the secondary market		(5,925	)		(2,720	)
Amortization of fair value adjustments		(240	)		-
Gain on sale of loans		(46	)		(36	)
Proceeds from sale of loans in the secondary market		18,796			5,194
Amortization of expense related to stock benefit plans		(8	)		(11	)
Loans originated for sale in the secondary market		(23,032	)		(5,112	)
Provision for losses on loans		150			40
Gain on sale of loans		(226	)		(82	)
(Gain) Loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		(122	)		22
Impairment on real estate acquired through foreclosure		138			100
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		-			(6	)
Loss on real estate acquired through foreclosure		12			-
Net increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance		(124	)		(69	)
Impairment on real estate acquired through foreclosure		-			81
Provision for losses on loans		200			100
Net increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance, net of acquisition		(39	)		(34	)
Amortization of expense related to stock benefit plans		18			390
Increase (decrease) in cash, net of acquisition, due to changes in:
Accrued interest receivable on loans		(~~142~~113	)		(127	)
Accrued interest receivable on mortgage-backed securities		1113			37
Accrued interest receivable on investments and interest-earning deposits		5741			(95147	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		~~(151~~506	)		(~~268~~363	)
Accrued interest payable		(~~660~~676	)		3(8	)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(~~828~~2,713	)		6528
Federal income taxes
Current		~~831~~445			~~207~~5
Deferred		~~(166~~701	)		~~(35~~91	)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		3,301			539
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(4,573	)		1,431
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Principal repayments on loans		1129,~~522~~839			1020,~~112~~729
Loan disbursements		(812,~~038~~270	)		(516,~~697~~054	)
Purchase of investment securities – available for sale		-(5,000	)		(3247,~~196~~191	)
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities – available for sale		523,~~000~~050			1440,901
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities – available for sale		~~337~~655			~~151~~415
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities – held to maturity		~~159~~290			~~261~~515
Proceeds from the sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		314			-
Proceeds from sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		1,878			461
Purchase of office premises and equipment		(102	)		-
Additions to real estate acquired through foreclosure		(100	)		(64	)
Purchase of office premises and equipment		(677	)		(1	)
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash received		(4,200	)		-
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities		4,992			(12,468	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		33,465			(289	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Cash flows provided by financing activities:
Net increase in deposits, net of acquisition		1,673			3,046
Net increase (decrease) in deposits – net of acquisition		(4,491	)		6,116
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		11,000			10,000
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances – net of acquisition		11,000			10,000
Repayments on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(1417,~~519~~158	)		(57,~~451~~802	)
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance, net of acquisition		(515	)		(493	)
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance – net of acquisition		(1,586	)		(948	)
Stock option expense, net		5			62
Treasury stock repurchases		-			(31	)
Dividends paid on common stock		(408	)		(374	)
Stock option expense, net		10			86
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		(2,764	)		6,790
Dividends paid on common stock		(816	)		(748	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,529			(5,139	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(13,041	)		6,673
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		15,851			7,815
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		18,149			11,283
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2334,~~678~~000		$	619,~~144~~098

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (~~UNAUDITED) (~~CONTINUED)

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

(In thousands)

	2011		2010
	(Unaudited)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Federal income taxes	$	~~120~~185	$	95524
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	12,~~109~~752	$	12,~~279~~494
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing activities:
Transfer from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure	$	435	$	23
Transfer of loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure	$	1,065	$	94
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights	$	62	$	22
Loans originated upon sales of real estate acquired through foreclosure	$	102	$	-
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights	$	83	$	38

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

1. Basis of Presentation

Cheviot Financial Corp. (“Cheviot Financial” or the “Corporation”) is a ~~financial~~savings and loan holding company, the principal asset of which consists of its ownership of Cheviot Savings Bank (the “Savings Bank”). The Savings Bank conducts a general banking business in southwestern Ohio which consists of attracting deposits and applying those funds ~~primarily~~ to the origination of primarily real estate loans. The Corporation is 62% owned by Cheviot Mutual Holding Company. Earnings per share is reported including all shares held by Cheviot Mutual Holding Company. Cheviot Mutual Holding Company has ~~to date~~ waived the receipt of dividends declared by the Corporation since incorporation. Cheviot Savings’ profitability is significantly dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by the relative amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest received or paid on these balances.

On March 16, 2011, the Corporation completed the acquisition of First Franklin Corporation (“First Franklin”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Franklin Savings and Loan Company (“Franklin Savings”). Accordingly, the Corporation’s unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three ~~months~~and six month periods ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 includes the accounts of First Franklin for the period March 17, 2011 to ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

~~The~~On ~~accompanying~~July ~~unaudited~~12, ~~consolidated~~2011 ~~financial~~Cheviot ~~statements~~Mutual ~~were~~Holding ~~prepared~~Company ~~in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q~~ and, ~~therefore,~~the doCorporation ~~not~~adopted ~~include information or footnotes necessary for~~ a ~~complete~~Plan ~~presentation~~ of ~~financial~~Conversion ~~position,~~whereby ~~results~~the ofmutual ~~operations~~holding ~~and~~company ~~cash~~would ~~flows~~convert infrom ~~conformity~~mutual ~~with~~to ~~accounting~~stock ~~principles~~form. As ~~generally~~part ~~accepted~~of in the ~~United~~Plan ~~States~~ of ~~America. Accordingly,~~Conversion ~~these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with~~ the ~~consolidated~~pro ~~financial~~forma ~~statements~~value ~~and notes thereto~~ of ~~Cheviot Financial included in~~ the ~~Annual~~62% ~~Report~~of ~~on Form 10-K for~~ the ~~year~~Corporation ~~ended~~owed ~~December~~by ~~31, 2010. However, in~~ the ~~opinion~~Mutual ofHolding ~~management,~~Company ~~all~~would ~~adjustments~~be ~~(consisting~~sold ofin ~~only~~a ~~normal~~subscription ~~recurring~~and ~~accruals)~~community ~~which~~offering ~~are~~and, if necessary, ~~for~~ a ~~fair~~syndicated ~~presentation~~community ~~of the consolidated financial statements have been included~~offering. The ~~results~~Plan of ~~operations~~Conversion ~~for~~is ~~the~~subject ~~three~~to ~~month~~regulatory ~~period~~approval ~~ended~~as ~~March~~well ~~31,~~as ~~2011~~the ~~are~~approval ~~not necessarily indicative~~ of the ~~results~~Mutual ~~which~~Holding ~~may~~Company’s bemembers ~~expected~~and ~~for~~ the ~~entire~~Corporation’s ~~year~~stockholders.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Cheviot Financial included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) which are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.

Cheviot Financial evaluates subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~and 2010~~ include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Savings Bank. All significant intercompany items have been eliminated.

3. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers and to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage-backed securities, maturities and calls of securities and funds provided by our operations. In addition, we may borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $4744.02 million and $27.3 million, respectively, in outstanding borrowings ~~from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati and had the capacity to increase such borrowings at those dates by approximately $125.0 million and $115.3 million, respectively.~~

Loan repayments and maturing securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of securities and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of these sources of funds.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

3. Liquidity and Capital Resources (continued)

~~Our~~from ~~primary~~the ~~investing~~Federal ~~activities~~Home ~~are~~Loan ~~the~~Bank ~~origination~~ of ~~one-~~Cincinnati ~~to four-family real estate loans, commercial real estate, construction~~ and ~~consumer~~had ~~loans, and~~ the ~~purchase~~capacity ofto ~~securities. For~~increase ~~the~~such ~~three~~borrowings ~~months~~at ~~ended~~those ~~March~~dates ~~31,~~by ~~2011,~~approximately ~~loan originations totaled~~ $14159.05 million, ~~compared~~and to $8115.43 million ~~for the three months ended March 31~~, ~~2010~~respectively.

~~Total~~Loan ~~deposits~~repayments ~~increased~~and ~~$223.2~~maturing ~~million~~securities ~~and~~are ~~$3.0~~a ~~million~~relatively ~~during~~predictable ~~the~~source ~~three~~of ~~months~~funds. However, ~~ended~~deposit ~~March 31~~flows, ~~2011~~calls of securities and ~~2010,~~prepayments ~~respectively. Deposit~~of ~~flows~~loans ~~are~~and ~~affected~~mortgage-backed bysecurities ~~the~~are ~~level~~strongly ofinfluenced by interest rates, ~~the~~general ~~interest~~and ~~rates~~local ~~and~~economic ~~products~~conditions ~~offered~~and bycompetition ~~competitors~~in ~~and~~the ~~other~~marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of these sources of funds.

~~The~~Our ~~following~~primary ~~table~~investing ~~sets~~activities ~~forth~~are ~~information~~the ~~regarding~~origination ~~the~~of ~~Corporation’s~~one- ~~obligations~~to ~~and~~four-family ~~commitments~~real toestate ~~make~~loans, ~~future~~commercial ~~payments~~real ~~under~~estate, ~~contracts~~construction asand consumer loans, and the purchase of ~~March~~securities. For 31the six months ended June 30, 2011, loan originations totaled $35.3 million, compared to $21.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

	Payments due by period
	Less than 1 year		More than 1-3 years		More than 4-5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	(In thousands)
Contractual obligations:
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	$	9,758	$	2,662	$	8,505	$	26,072	$	46,997
Certificates of deposit		153,177		69,691		59,653		9		282,530
Amount of loan commitments and expiration per period:
Commitments to originate one- to four-family loans		516		-		-		-		516
Home equity lines of credit		32,450		-		-		-		32,450
Commercial lines of credit		526		-		-		-		526
Undisbursed loans in process		3,029		-		-		-		3,029
Lease obligations		132		276		290		1,518		2,216
Total contractual obligations	$	199,588	$	72,629	$	68,448	$	27,599	$	368,264

Total deposits increased $217.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and increased $6.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The increase during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is due to the purchase of First Franklin. Deposit flows are affected by the level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by competitors and other factors.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Corporation’s obligations and commitments to make future payments under contract as of June 30, 2011.

			Payments due by period
	Less		More than		More than		More
	than			1-3		4-5	than
	1 year		years		years		5 years		Total
	(In thousands)

Contractual obligations:
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	$	10,005	$	2,129	$	7,774	$	24,337	$	44,245
Certificates of deposit		144,079		71,413		64,388		722		280,602

Amount of loan commitments and expiration per period:

Commitments to originate one- to four-family loans		1,592		-		-		-		1,592
Home equity lines of credit		31,918		-		-		-		31,918
Commercial lines of credit		404		-		-		-		404
Undisbursed loans in process		3,994		-		-		-		3,994

Total contractual obligations	$	191,992	$	73,542	$	72,162	$	25,059	$	362,755

We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position. We monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. Based on our deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion of maturing time deposits will be retained.

At March 31, 2011 and 2010, we exceeded all of the applicable regulatory capital requirements. Our core (Tier 1) capital was $56.6 million and $55.2 million, or 9.5% and 16.0% of total assets at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In order to be classified as “well-capitalized” under federal banking regulations, we were required to have core capital of at least $36.4 million, or 6.0% of assets as of March 31, 2011. To be classified as a well-capitalized bank, we must also have a ratio of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 10.0%. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, we had a total risk-based capital ratio of 17.3% and 33.2%, respectively.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

3. Liquidity and Capital Resources (continued)

At June 30, 2011 and 2010, we exceeded all of the applicable regulatory capital requirements. Our core (Tier 1) capital was $57.6 million and $56.2 million, or 9.8% and 16.5% of total assets at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In order to be classified as “well-capitalized” under federal banking regulations, we were required to have core capital of at least $35.8 million, or 6.0% of assets as of June 30, 2011. To be classified as a well-capitalized bank, we must also have a ratio of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 10.0%. At June 30, 2011 and 2010, we had a total risk-based capital ratio of 17.8% and 34.0%, respectively.

4. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed based upon the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period, less shares in the ESOP that are unallocated and not committed to be released plus shares in the ESOP that have been allocated. The weighted average common shares outstanding includes 5,455,313 shares held by Cheviot Mutual Holding Company. Weighted-average common shares deemed outstanding gives effect to 107,126 and 142,833 unallocated shares held by the ESOP for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

	For the three months ended March 31,
	For the six months ended				For the three months ended
	2011		2010
	June 30,				June 30,
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic)		8,757,782		8,725,873
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Dilutive effect of assumed exercise of stock options		7,927		7,919
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic)		8,757,782		8,724,677		8,757,782		8,723,494
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (diluted)		8,765,709		8,733,792
Dilutive effect of assumed exercise of stock options		9,661		9,486		10,187		9,456
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (diluted)		8,767,443		8,734,163		8,767,969		8,732,950

5. Stock ~~Option~~Incentive Plan

On April 26, 2005, the Corporation approved a Stock Incentive Plan that provides for grants of up to 486,018 stock options. During 2011, 2010, ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2009 approximately 84,~~860~~400, 8,~~060~~860, and 8,060 ~~stock~~option ~~options~~awards for shares were granted, all of which are subject to a five year vesting ~~period~~.

The Corporation follows Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 (ASC 718), “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” for its stock option plans, and accordingly, the Corporation recognizes the expense of these grants as required. Stock-based employee compensation costs pertaining to stock options ishave been reflected as a net increase in shareholders’ equity, for both any new grants, as well as for all unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005, in both cases using the fair values established by usage of the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and are expensed over the vesting period of the underlying option.

The Corporation elected the modified prospective transition method in applying ASC 718. Under this method, the ~~provisions of ASC 718 apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption, as well as for all unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005. The~~ compensation cost recorded for unvested equity-based awards is based on their grant-date fair value. For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31~~June, 2011, the Corporation recorded $510,000 in after-tax compensation cost for equity-based awards that vested during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. The Corporation has $6279,~~000~~500 unrecognized pre-tax compensation cost related to non-vested equity-based awards granted under its stock incentive plan as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of approximately 0.2 years.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

5. Stock Option Plan (continued)

A summary of the status of the Corporation’s stock option plan as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, and the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as the changes during the ~~period~~periods then ended isare presented below:

	Three months ended March 31, 2011				Year ended December 31, 2010
	Six months ended				Year ended
	Shares		Weighted- average exercise price		Shares		Weighted- average exercise price
	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
			Weighted-				Weighted-
			average				average
			exercise				exercise
	Shares		price		Shares		price
Outstanding at beginning of period		421,200	$	11.05		412,340	$	11.17
Granted		-4,400		-9.04		8,860		8.07
Exercised		-		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-		-
Outstanding at end of period		~~421~~425,~~200~~600	$	11.0502		421,200	$	11.05
Options exercisable at period-end		~~397~~404,~~260~~760	$	11.1614		397,260	$	11.16
Options expected to be exercisable at year-end
Fair value of options granted			$	5.30			$	4.83
Fair value of options granted			NA				$	4.83
The following information applies to options outstanding at March 31, 2011:
Number outstanding								421,200
Exercise price								$8.07 - $13.63
Weighted-average exercise price								$11.05
Weighted-average remaining contractual life							4.4 years

The ~~expected~~following ~~term~~information ofapplies options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise behavior. The risk free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to ~~the~~options ~~expected~~outstanding ~~life~~ at ~~the~~June ~~grant~~30, ~~date. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock.~~2011:

The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2010: dividend yield of 5.45%, expected volatility of 44.55%, risk-free interest rate of 3.38% and an expected life of 10 years for each grant.

Number outstanding	425,600
Exercise price	$8.07 - $13.63
Weighted-average exercise price	$11.14
Weighted-average remaining contractual life	4.3 years

The expected term of options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life at grant date. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock.

The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2011: dividend yield of 5.22%, expected volatility of 44.17%, risk-free interest rate of 2.98% and an expected life of 10 years for each grant.

The effects of expensing stock options are reported in “cash provided by financing activities” in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

6. Investment and Mortgage-backed Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of investment securities at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are shown below.

	March 31, 2011
					June 30, 2011
	Amortized cost			Gross unrealized gains			Gross unrealized losses			Estimated fair value
					Gross			Gross			Estimated
	(In thousands)
		Amortized			unrealized			unrealized			fair
		cost			gains			losses			value
		(In thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agency securities		$	9784,~~818~~795		$	~~112~~315		$	~~1,430~~223		$	9684,~~500~~887
Municipal obligations			3,~~143~~142			4164			~~161~~77			3,~~023~~129
		$	~~100~~87,~~961~~937		$	~~153~~379		$	~~1,591~~300		$	9988,~~523~~016
	December 31, 2010
	Amortized cost			Gross unrealized gains			Gross unrealized losses			Estimated fair value
	(In thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agency securities		$	88,529		$	102		$	1,622		$	87,009
Municipal obligations			1,545			5			177			1,373
		$	90,074		$	107		$	1,799		$	88,382

The amortized cost of investment securities at March 31, 2011, by contractual term to maturity, are shown below.

			December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		fair
	cost		gains		losses		value
	(In thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agency securities	$	88,529	$	102	$	1,622	$	87,009
Municipal obligations		1,545		5		177		1,373

	$	90,074	$	107	$	1,799	$	88,382

	March 31,
	2011
	(In thousands)
Less than one year	$	24,136
One to five years		49,245
Five to ten years		15,684
More than ten years		11,896
	$	100,961

The amortized cost of investment securities at June 30, 2011, by contractual term to maturity, are shown below.

	June 30,
	2011
	(In thousands)
Less than one year	$	53,019
One to five years		19,329
Five to ten years		9,122
More than ten years		6,467

	$	87,937

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

6. Investment and Mortgage-backed Securities (continued)

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of mortgage-backed securities at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are shown below.

	March 31, 2011
			June 30, 2011
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		fair
	cost		gains		losses		value
	(In thousands)
Available for sale:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates	$	1,~~276~~230	$	3286	$	-1	$	1,~~308~~315
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		3,~~305~~109		1549		32		3,~~317~~156
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		3,~~878~~791		~~106~~101		-5		3,~~984~~887
	$	8,~~459~~130	$	~~153~~236	$	38	$	8,~~609~~358
Held to maturity:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates	$	~~441~~425	$	576	$	-1	$	~~498~~430
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		~~489~~465		627		-		~~551~~472
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		3,~~689~~598		~~395~~133		5-		43,~~079~~731
	$	4,~~619~~488	$	~~514~~146	$	51	$	54,~~128~~633

	December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		fair
	cost		gains		losses		value
	(In thousands)
Available for sale:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates	$	723	$	13	$	-	$	736
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		548		17		-		565
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		2,908		70		-		2,978
	$	4,179	$	100	$	-	$	4,279

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

6. Investment and Mortgage-backed Securities (continued)

	~~December 31, 2010~~		December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		fair
	cost		gains		losses		value
	(In thousands)
Available for sale:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates	$	723	$	13	$	-	$	736
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		548		17		-		565
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		2,908		70		-		2,978
	$	4,179	$	100	$	-	$	4,279
Held to maturity:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates	$	464	$	10	$	1	$	473
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		515		7		-		522
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		3,800		121		-		3,921
	$	4,779	$	138	$	1	$	4,916

The amortized cost of mortgage-backed securities, including those designated as available for sale, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, by contractual terms to maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may generally prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.

	March 31,
	June 30,
	2011
	(In thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	~~526~~570
Due in one year through five years		2,~~287~~433
Due in five years through ten years		3,~~312~~421
Due in more than ten years		6,~~953~~194
	$	1312,~~078~~618

	Less than 12 months						12 months or longer						Total
Description of	Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized
securities	investments		value		losses		investments		value		losses		investments		value		losses
	(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Government agency securities		28	$	71,375	$	1,430		-	$	-	$	-		28	$	71,375	$	1,430
Municipal obligations		6		659		21		2		1,095		140		8		1,754		161
Mortgage-backed securities		25		360		8		-		-		-		25		360		8
Total temporarily impaired securities		59	$	72,394	$	1,459		2	$	1,095	$	140		61	$	73,489	$	1,599

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

6. Investment and Mortgage-backed Securities (continued)

~~Management~~The ~~does~~table ~~not~~below ~~intend~~indicates tothe ~~sell~~length ~~any~~ of ~~the~~time ~~debt~~individual securities ~~with~~have anbeen ~~unrealized~~in ~~loss and does not believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell~~ a ~~security~~continuous ~~in an~~ unrealized loss position ~~prior~~at toJune a30, recovery in value. The decline in the fair value is primarily due to an increase in market interest rates. The fair values are expected to recover as securities approach maturity dates. The Company has evaluated these securities and has determined that the decline in their values is temporary.2011:

	Less than 12 months						12 months or longer								Total
Description of	Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized
securities	investments		value		losses		investments		value		losses		investments		value		losses
	(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Government agency securities		6	$	19,774	$	223		-	$	-	$	-		6	$	19,774	$	223
Municipal obligations		3		443		3		2		1,161		74		5		1,604		77
Mortgage-backed securities		13		452		8		4		164		1		17		616		9

Total temporarily impaired securities		22	$	20,669	$	234		6	$	1,325	$	75		28	$	21,994	$	309

Management does not intend to sell any of the debt securities with an unrealized loss and does not believe that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position prior to a recovery in value. The fair values are expected to recover as securities approach maturity dates. The Corporation has evaluated these securities and has determined that the decline in their values is temporary.

7. Income Taxes

The Corporation uses an asset and liability approach to accounting for income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not that a future benefit will be realized. The Corporation accounts for income taxes in accordance with ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“~~ FASB”) ~~Accounting Standards Codification (“~~ASC”) 740, Income Taxes, which prescribes the recognition and measurement criteria related to tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.

The Corporation’s principal temporary differences between financial income and taxable income result mainly from different methods of accounting for ~~deferred loan origination fees and costs,~~ Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends, the general loan loss allowance, deferred compensation, stock benefit plans, ~~goodwill~~ and ~~intangible~~fair ~~assets~~value adjustments arising from the First Franklin acquisition. The Corporation has approximately $86.34 million of ~~net~~ operating losses to carryforward for the next 20 years. These ~~losses~~loss carryforwards are subject to the Internal Revenue Code section 382 limitations which allow approximately $1.1 million of the losses on an annual basis to offset current year taxable income.

The Corporation recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. AtThe ~~adoption date, January 1, 2007 the~~ Corporation has applied ~~the~~this standard to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remained open. ~~and~~The Corporation was not required to record any liability for unrecognized tax benefits as ~~that~~of ~~date. There~~June ~~have been no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits since January 1~~30, ~~2007~~2011. The known tax attributes which can influence the Corporation’s effective tax rate is the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards subject to the limitations under Internal Revenue Code section 382.

The Corporation is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the Corporation is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2008.

The Corporation will recognize, if applicable, interest accrued related to unrecognized tax liabilities in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

7. Income Taxes (continued)

~~Federal~~The Corporation is subject to income ~~tax~~taxes onin ~~earnings~~the ~~differs~~United ~~from~~States. Tax ~~that~~regulations ~~computed~~are atsubject to the ~~statutory~~interpretation ~~corporate~~of the related tax ~~rate~~laws ~~for~~and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the ~~periods~~Corporation ~~ended~~is ~~March~~no 31longer subject to U.S. federal, ~~2011~~or state and ~~2010:~~local, tax examinations for years before 2008.

	2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
Federal income taxes at statutory rate of 34%	$	188		$	262
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting primarily from:
Stock compensation		(4	)		23
Nontaxable interest income		(6	)		(5	)
Cash surrender value of life insurance		(13	)		(12	)
Utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, previously reserved		(166	)		-
Other		1			(1	)
Federal income taxes per financial statements	$	-		$	267
Effective tax rate		0	%		34.7	%

The Corporation will recognize, if applicable, interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

~~8. Disclosures~~Federal ~~About~~income ~~Fair~~tax ~~Value~~on ofearnings ~~Assets~~differs from that computed at the statutory corporate tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and ~~Liabilities~~2010:

	2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands)

Federal income taxes at statutory rate of 34%	$	593		$	579
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting primarily from:
Stock compensation		(8	)		74
Nontaxable interest income		(16	)		(10	)
Cash surrender value of life insurance		(42	)		(24	)
Utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, previously reserved		(241	)		-
Other		4			3

Federal income taxes per consolidated financial statements	$	290		$	622

Effective tax rate		16.6	%		36.5	%

8. Disclosures about Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy exists for fair value measurements based upon the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability.

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Fair value methods and assumptions are set forth below for each type of financial instrument.

Securities available for sale: Fair value on available for sale securities were based upon a market approach. Securities which are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets, are valued using prices obtained from our custodian, which used third party data service providers. Available for sale securities includes U.S. agency securities, municipal bonds and mortgage-backed agency securities.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

8. Disclosures ~~About~~about Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

Securities available for sale: Fair ~~Value~~values ~~Measurements~~on atavailable ~~March~~for 31sale securities were based upon a market approach. Securities which are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, ~~2011~~but ~~and~~are ~~December~~traded 31in active markets, ~~2010~~are valued using prices obtained from our custodian, which used third party data service providers.

	Quoted prices
	in active	Significant		Significant
	markets for	other		other
	identical	observable		unobservable
	assets	inputs		inputs
	(Level 1)	(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Securities available for sale at March 31, 2011:
U.S. Government agency securities	-	$	96,500	-
Municipal obligations	-	$	3,023	-
Mortgage-backed securities	-	$	8,609	-
Securities available for sale at December 31, 2010:
U.S. Government agency securities	-	$	87,009	-
Municipal obligations	-	$	1,373	-
Mortgage-backed securities	-	$	4,279	-

Available for sale securities include U.S. agency securities, municipal bonds and mortgage-backed agency securities.

~~The~~ Fair ~~Corporation~~Value isMeasurements ~~predominately an asset-based lender with real estate serving as collateral on a substantial majority of loans. Loans which are deemed to be impaired are primarily valued on a nonrecurring basis~~ at ~~the~~June fair values of the underlying real estate collateral. In addition, on the acquisition date the Corporation independently fair valued $25.0 million of First Franklin’s impaired loans, as well as $173.2 million of performing loans. First Franklin’s impaired loans subject to fair value write-downs are not included in Cheviot Financial’s non-performing loan totals. Such loans are considered performing under Topic ASC 310-30, ~~even~~2011 ~~though the loans are contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the periodic re-estimation of expected cash flows~~ and the resulting loss provisions or future period yield adjustments. The fair values were obtained using independent appraisals, which the Corporation considers to be Level 2 inputs. The aggregate carrying amount of the Corporation’s impaired loans at March 31, 2011 was approximately $4.3 million, compared to approximately $4.9 million at December 31, 2010.

The Corporation has real estate acquired through foreclosure totaling $4.5 million and $2.0 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at the lower of the cost or fair value less estimated selling expenses at the date of acquisition. Fair values are obtained using independent appraisals, based on comparable sales which the Corporation considers to be Level 2 inputs. The aggregate amount of real estate acquired through foreclosure that is carried at fair value was approximately $3.7 million at March 31, 2011 and $1.1 million at December 31, 2010. The aggregate amount of real estate acquired through foreclosure which is carried at historic cost totaled $834,000 at March 31, 2011.

	Quoted prices
	in active		Significant		Significant
	markets for		other		other
	identical		observable		unobservable
	assets		inputs		inputs
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Securities available for sale at June 30, 2011:

U.S. Government agency securities		-	$	84,887		-
Municipal obligations		-	$	3,129		-
Mortgage-backed securities		-	$	8,358		-

Securities available for sale at December 31, 2010:

U.S. Government agency securities		-	$	87,009		-
Municipal obligations		-	$	1,373		-
Mortgage-backed securities		-	$	4,279		-

The Corporation is predominately an asset-based lender with real estate serving as collateral on a substantial majority of loans. Loans which are deemed to be impaired are primarily valued on a nonrecurring basis at the fair values of the underlying real estate collateral. In addition, on the acquisition date the Corporation independently fair valued $25.0 million of First Franklin’s impaired loans, as well as $173.2 million of performing loans. First Franklin’s impaired loans subject to fair value adjustments are not included in Cheviot Financial’s non-performing loan totals. Such loans are considered performing under Topic ASC 310-30, even though the loans are contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the periodic re-estimation of expected cash flows and the resulting loss provisions or future period yield adjustments. The fair values were obtained using independent appraisals, which the Corporation considers to be Level 2 inputs. The aggregate carrying amount of the Corporation’s impaired loans at June 30, 2011 was $5.2 million, compared to $4.9 million at December 31, 2010.

The Corporation has real estate acquired through foreclosure totaling $3.7 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $2.0 million at December 31, 2010. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at the lower of the cost or fair value less estimated selling expenses at the date of acquisition. Fair values are obtained using independent appraisals, based on comparable sales which the Corporation considers to be Level 2 inputs. The aggregate amount of real estate acquired through foreclosure that is carried at fair value was $2.7 million at June 30, 2011 and $1.1 million at December 31, 2010. The aggregate amount of real estate acquired through foreclosure that is carried at cost was $936,000 at June 30, 2011.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

9. Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We adopted the following accounting guidance in 2011, none of which had a material effect, if any, on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures ~~About~~about Fair Value Measurements,” which amends the guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures. The guidance in ASU 2010-06 requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. Furthermore, ASU 2010-06 requires a reporting entity to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs; clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value; and amends guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets to require that disclosures be provided by classes of assets instead of by major categories of assets. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective January 1, 2011 and for interim periods thereafter. In the period of initial adoption, entities ~~will~~are not be required to provide the amended disclosures for any previous periods presented for comparative purposes. ~~Early adoption is permitted.~~ The adoption of this guidance did not have a ~~significantly~~material impact our annual and interim financial statement disclosures and did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, “When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” This ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal year, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2011 did not have a material effect on the Corporation’s results of operation or financial position.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” The amendments in this update specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the current and comparable prior annual reporting period. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Management has provided the required pro forma disclosures ~~related~~in to the period of acquisition of First Franklin ~~acquisition~~for inthe ~~Note~~quarter 11ended ~~herein~~March 31, 2011.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

9. ~~Effect~~Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In April 2011, the FASB ASU No. 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) - A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” ASU 2011-02 clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings and is intended to assist creditors in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure of troubled debt restructurings. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor must separately conclude, under the guidance clarified by ASU 2011-02, that both of the following exist: (a) the restructuring constitutes a concession; and (b) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. ASU 2011-02 will be effective for the Corporation on July 1, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011. Adoption of ASU 2011-02 is not expected to have a ~~significant~~material impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-4, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.” This Update provides guidance which is expected to result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. It changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. It is not intended for this Update to result in a change in the application of the requirements in Topic 820. Some of the amendments clarify the Board’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. We do not anticipate any material impact from this Update.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-5, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).” In this Update, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The amendments in this Update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. They also do not change the presentation of related tax effects, before related tax effects, or the portrayal or calculation of earnings per share. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively. The amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures. We do not anticipate any material impact from this Update.

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate the value, is based upon the characteristics of the instruments and relevant market information. Financial instruments include cash, evidence of ownership in an entity or contracts that convey or impose on an entity the contractual right or obligation to either receive or deliver cash for another financial instrument. These fair value estimates are based on relevant market information and information about the financial instruments. Fair value estimates are intended to represent the price for which an asset could be sold or liability could be settled. However, given there is no active market or observable market transactions for many of the Corporation’s financial instruments, it has made estimates of many of these fair values which are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with ~~precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimated values.~~

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments at March 31, 2011:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents are deemed to approximate fair value.

Investment and mortgage-backed securities: For investment and mortgage-backed securities, fair value is deemed to equal the quoted market price.

Loans receivable: The loan portfolio was segregated into categories with similar characteristics, such as one-to four-family residential, multi-family residential and commercial real estate. These loan categories were further delineated into fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans. The fair values for the resultant loan categories were computed via discounted cash flow analysis, using current interest rates offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. For loans on deposit accounts, fair values were deemed to equal the historic carrying values. The historical carrying amount of accrued interest on loans is deemed to approximate fair value.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock: The carrying amount presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition is deemed to approximate fair value.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

~~Deposits:~~precision. ~~The~~Changes ~~fair~~in ~~value~~assumptions ofcould ~~NOW~~significantly ~~accounts,~~affect ~~passbook accounts, and money market demand deposits is deemed to approximate~~ the ~~amount~~estimated ~~payable on demand at March 31, 2011~~values. ~~Fair~~The ~~values~~fair ~~for~~value ~~fixed-rate~~estimates ~~certificates~~are ofdetermined ~~deposit~~in ~~have~~accordance ~~been~~with ~~estimated~~SFAS ~~using a discounted cash flow calculation using the interest rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities~~No. 157.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments at June 30, 2011:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents are deemed to approximate fair value.

Investment and mortgage-backed securities: For investment and mortgage-backed securities, fair value is deemed to equal the quoted market price.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock: The carrying amount presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition is deemed to approximate fair value.

Deposits: The fair value of NOW accounts, passbook accounts, and money market demand deposits is deemed to approximate the amount payable on demand at June 30, 2011. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit have been estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation using the interest rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair value of these advances is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar advances of similar remaining maturities or, when available, quoted market prices.

Advances by Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance: The carrying amount of advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance is deemed to approximate fair value.

Commitments to extend credit: For fixed-rate loan commitments, the fair value estimate considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and committed rates. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the fair value of the derivative loan commitments was not material.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,678	$	23,678	$	18,149	$	18,149
Investment securities		99,523		99,523		88,382		88,382
Mortgage-backed securities		13,228		13,737		9,058		9,195
Loans receivable - net		414,378		422,727		225,438		233,272
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		8,366		8,366		3,375		3,375
	$	559,173	$	568,031	$	344,402	$	352,373
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	481,052	$	481,304	$	257,852	$	257,672
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		46,997		48,323		27,300		30,597
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		2,217		2,217		1,440		1,440
	$	530,266	$	531,844	$	286,592	$	289,709

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:


	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	34,000	$	34,000	$	18,149	$	18,149
Investment securities		88,016		88,016		88,382		88,382
Mortgage-backed securities		12,846		12,991		9,058		9,195
Loans receivable - net		407,653		420,930		225,438		233,272
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		8,366		8,366		3,375		3,375

	$	550,881	$	564,303	$	344,402	$	352,373

Financial liabilities Deposits	$	474,888	$	475,027	$	257,852	$	257,672
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		44,245		46,266		27,300		30,597
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		1,146		1,146		1,440		1,440

	$	520,279	$	522,439	$	286,592	$	289,709

11. Acquisition Activity

First Franklin Corporation

As previously stated, on March 16, 2011, Cheviot Financial, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cheviot Savings Bank, completed the acquisition of First Franklin and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Franklin Savings. The acquisition was consummated in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of October 12, 2010, by and among Cheviot Financial Corp., Cheviot Savings Bank, Cheviot Merger Subsidiary, Inc., First Franklin and Franklin Savings.

At the effective time of the acquisition, each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of First Franklin (other than shares owned by First Franklin, Cheviot Financial, Cheviot Savings Bank and Merger Subsidiary) was converted into the right to receive $14.50 in cash. Each First Franklin stock option outstanding at the time of the closing was converted into an amount of cash equal to the positive difference, if any, between $14.50 and the exercise price of such stock option. The aggregate cash consideration paid in the acquisition (including the cancellation of stock options) was approximately $24.7 million.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities were measured at estimated fair values, as required by FASB under Business Combinations. Management made significant estimates and exercised significant judgment in accounting for the acquisition. Management measured loan fair values based on loan file reviews (including borrower financial statements or tax returns), appraised collateral values, expected cash flows and historical loss factors of Franklin Savings. Real estate acquired through foreclosure was primarily valued based on appraised collateral values. The Company also recorded an identifiable intangible asset representing the core deposit base of Franklin Savings based on management’s evaluation of the cost of such deposits relative to alternative funding sources. Management used significant estimates including the average lives of depository accounts, future interest rate levels and the cost of servicing various depository products. Management used market quotations to fair value investment securities and FHLB advances.

The business combination resulted in the acquisition of loans with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration. First Franklin’s loans were deemed impaired at the acquisition date if Cheviot Financial did not expect to receive all contractually required cash flows due to concerns about credit quality. Such loans were fair valued and the difference between contractually required payments at the acquisition date and cash flows expected to be collected was recorded as a nonaccretable difference. At the acquisition date, Cheviot Financial recorded $25.0 million of purchased credit-impaired loans subject to a nonaccretable difference of $5.5 million. The method of measuring carrying value of purchased loans differs from loans originated by the Company (originated loans), and as such, the Company identifies purchased loans and purchased loans with a credit quality discount and originated loans at amortized cost.

First Franklin's loans without evidence of credit deterioration were fair valued by discounting both expected principal and interest cash flows using an observable discount rate for similar instruments that a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Additionally, consideration was given to management’s best estimates of default rates and payment speeds. At acquisition, First Franklin’s loan portfolio without evidence of deterioration totaled $173.2 million and was recorded at a fair value of $171.6 million.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

11. Acquisition Activity (continued)

The ~~following~~acquired ~~table~~assets ~~summarizes~~and assumed liabilities were measured at estimated fair values, as required by the ~~purchase~~FASB under Business Combinations. Management made significant estimates and exercised significant judgment in accounting for the acquisition. Management measured loan fair values based on loan file reviews (including borrower financial statements or tax returns), appraised collateral values, expected cash flows and historical loss factors of ~~First~~Franklin Savings. Real estate acquired through foreclosure was primarily valued based on appraised collateral values. The Corporation also recorded an identifiable intangible asset representing the core deposit base of Franklin asSavings based on management’s evaluation of ~~March~~the 16cost of such deposits relative to alternative funding sources. Management used significant estimates including the average lives of depository accounts, ~~2011:~~future interest rate levels and the cost of servicing various depository products. Management used market quotations to fair value investment securities and FHLB advances.

Purchase Price
First Franklin common shares outstanding (in millions)		1,693
Purchase price per share of First Franklin’s common stock	$	14.50
Total value of the First Franklin’s common stock	$	24,549
Fair value of outstanding employee stock awards		131
Total purchase price	$	24,680
Allocation of purchase price
Stockholders’ equity	$	16,365
Pre-tax adjustments to reflect acquired assets and liabilities at fair value:
Loans receivable		2,365
Real estate owned		750
Office premises and equipment		(1,970	)
Core deposit intangible		(1,298	)
Certificates of deposit		2,718
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		838
Other assets/liabilities		(427	)
Pre-tax total adjustments		2,976
Deferred income taxes		(1,047	)
After-tax total adjustments		1,929
Fair value of net assets acquired		14,436
Goodwill resulting from the First Franklin acquisition	$	10,244

The business combination resulted in the acquisition of loans with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration. First Franklin’s loans were deemed impaired at the acquisition date if Cheviot Financial did not expect to receive all contractually required cash flows due to concerns about credit quality. Such loans were fair valued and the difference between contractually required payments at the acquisition date and cash flows expected to be collected was recorded as a nonaccretable difference. At the acquisition date, Cheviot Financial recorded $25.0 million of purchased credit-impaired loans subject to a nonaccretable difference of $5.5 million. The method of measuring carrying value of purchased loans differs from loans originated by the Corporation (originated loans), and as such, the Corporation identifies purchased loans and purchased loans with a credit quality discount and originated loans at amortized cost.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

11. Acquisition Activity (continued)

The following ~~condensed~~table ~~statement~~summarizes ~~reflects~~ the ~~values~~purchase ~~assigned~~of to First Franklin’s ~~net assets~~ as of ~~the~~March ~~acquisition~~16, ~~date~~2011:

	March 16, 2011
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,480
Investment securities		15,618
Mortgage-backed securities		4,497
Loans receivable – net		196,618
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		2,404
Office premises and equipment		4,927
Goodwill and intangible assets		11,542
Other assets		21,475
Total Assets	$	277,561
Liabilities:
Deposits	$	221,528
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		23,216
Other borrowings		1,490
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		6,647
Total liabilities		252,881
Fair value of net assets acquired	$	24,680

Purchase price

Identifiable intangibles are amortized to their estimated residual values over the expected useful lives. Such lives are also periodically reassessed to determine if any amortization period adjustments are required. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, no such adjustments were recorded. The identifiable intangible asset consists of a core deposit intangible which is being amortized on an accelerated basis over the useful life of such asset. The gross carrying amount of the core deposit intangible at March 31, 2011 was $1.3 million with no accumulated amortization as of that date.


Purchase price
First Franklin common shares outstanding (in thousands)		1,693
Purchase price per share of First Franklin’s common stock	$	14.50
Total value of the First Franklin’s common stock	$	24,549
Fair value of outstanding employee stock awards, net of tax		131

Total purchase price	$	24,680

Allocation of purchase price
Stockholders’ equity	$	20,755

Pre-tax adjustments to reflect acquired assets and liabilities at fair value:
Loans receivable		(2,462	)
Real estate owned		(750	)
Office premises and equipment		1,970
Core deposit intangible		1,298
Certificates of deposit		(2,718	)
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		(838	)
Contractual obligations		(4,390	)
Other assets/liabilities		427
Pre-tax total adjustments		(7,463	)

Deferred income tax benefits, net of valuation allowance		1,079
After-tax total adjustments		(6,384	)
Fair value of net assets acquired		14,371

Goodwill resulting from the First Franklin acquisition	$	10,309

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

11. Acquisition Activity (continued)

AsThe offollowing ~~March~~condensed ~~31,~~statement ~~2011,~~reflects the ~~current~~values ~~year~~assigned ~~and~~to ~~estimated~~First ~~future~~Franklin’s ~~amortization~~net ~~expense~~assets ~~for~~as of the ~~core~~acquisition ~~deposit intangible was~~date:

	2011		$	270
		March 16, 2011
	2012			282
		(in thousands)
	2013			206
Assets:
	2014			149
Cash and cash equivalents		$	20,480
	2015			116
Investment securities			15,618
	2016			110
Mortgage-backed securities			4,497
	2017			110
Loans receivable – net			196,519
	2018			55
Real estate acquired through foreclosure			2,404
Total			$	1,298
Office premises and equipment			4,927
Goodwill and intangible assets			11,607
Other assets			21,509
Total Assets		$	277,561
Liabilities:
Deposits		$	221,528
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank			23,216
Other borrowings			1,490
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			6,647
Total liabilities			252,881
Fair value of net assets acquired		$	24,680

The ~~following~~Corporation ~~pro~~recorded ~~forma~~goodwill ~~financial~~and ~~information~~other ~~reflects~~intangibles ~~Cheviot~~associated ~~Financial’s~~with ~~revenue~~the ~~and~~purchase ~~results~~ of ~~operations as if the~~ First Franklin ~~acquisition~~and ~~had~~Franklin ~~occurred~~Savings astotaling of$11.6 ~~January 1, 2011 and 2010~~million. ~~The~~Goodwill ~~pro forma information~~ is ~~presented~~not ~~for~~amortized, ~~information~~but ~~purposes only and~~ is ~~not~~periodically ~~indicative~~evaluated offor ~~results~~impairment. The ofCorporation ~~operations~~did ~~that~~not ~~would~~recognize ~~have~~any ~~been~~impairment ~~achieved~~during if the ~~acquisition~~quarter ~~had~~ended ~~taken~~June ~~place as of January 1~~30, 2011. The ~~and~~carrying ~~January~~amount 1,of ~~2010,~~the ~~respectively,~~goodwill ~~nor~~at isJune ~~such~~30, ~~information~~2011 ~~indicative~~was of$10.3 ~~any future results~~million.

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands)
	Cheviot Financial			First Franklin				Pro-Forma(1) Adjustments				Pro Forma Combined
Revenue		$	4,207		$	3,270			$	-			$	7,477
Net earnings (loss)		$	552		$	(1,846	)		$	(2,508	)		$	(3,802	)
Basic and diluted loss per share													$	(.43	)

Identifiable intangibles are amortized to their estimated residual values over the expected useful lives. Such lives are also periodically reassessed to determine if any amortization period adjustments are required. During the quarter ended June, 2011, no such adjustments were recorded. The identifiable intangible asset consists of a core deposit intangible which is being amortized on an accelerated basis over the useful life of such asset. The gross carrying amount of the core deposit intangible at June 30, 2011 was $1.2 million with $90,000 in accumulated amortization as of that date.

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands)
	Cheviot Financial			First Franklin				Pro-Forma(1) Adjustments				Pro Forma Combined
Revenue		$	4,189		$	4,301			$	-			$	8,490
Net earnings (loss)		$	503		$	(82	)		$	(2,508	)		$	(2,087	)
Basic and diluted loss per share													$	(.24	)

(1)The pro-forma adjustments relate to the First Franklin’s pre-tax payment of $3.4 million in contractual liabilities for change in control and 407,000 in pre-tax transaction costs as if the transaction occurred on January 1, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

11. Acquisition Activity (continued)

As of June 30, 2011, the current year and estimated future amortization expense for the core deposit intangible was:

2011	$	180
2012		282
2013		206
2014		149
2015		116
2016		110
2017		110
2018		55
Total	$	1,208

12. Financing Receivables

The recorded investment in loans was as follows as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011:

	One-to four Family Residential			Multi-family Residential			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
Purchased loans	$	~~136~~135,~~691~~387		$	1513,~~537~~338		$	-—		$	4443,~~887~~607		$	54,~~263~~164		$	~~202~~196,~~378~~496
Credit quality discount		(2,~~737~~524	)		(208	)		-—			(2,~~370~~451	)		(1,~~808~~804	)		(76,~~123~~987	)
Purchased loans book value		133,954			15,329			-			42,517			3,455			195,255
Purchased loans book value (3)		132,863			13,130			—			41,156			2,360			189,509
Originated loans (1)		~~188~~184,~~572~~418			810,~~255~~353			57,~~609~~406	(2 )		1920,~~650~~796			~~237~~276			~~222~~223,~~323~~249
Ending balance	$	~~322~~317,~~526~~281		$	23,~~584~~483		$	57,~~609~~406		$	6261,~~167~~952		$	32,~~692~~636		$	~~417~~412,~~578~~758

(1)	Includes loans held for sale

(2)	Before consideration of undisbursed Loans-in-process

~~The~~(3) ~~carrying~~Loans ~~amount of~~ purchased ~~loans consisting of credit-impaired purchased loans and non-impaired purchased loans is shown~~ in ~~the~~acquisition ~~following table as~~ of ~~March~~First ~~31, 2011.~~Franklin

	Non-impaired Purchased Loans		Credit Impaired Purchased Loans
One-to-four family residential	$	125,777	$	8,177
Multi-family residential		14,219		1,110
Construction		-		-
Commercial		33,602		8,915
Consumer		2,178		1,277
Total	$	175,776	$	19,479

The carrying amount of purchased loans consisting of credit-impaired purchased loans and non-impaired purchased loans is shown in the following table as of June 30, 2011.

The following summarizes activity in the allowance for credit losses:


	Non-impaired Purchased Loans		Credit Impaired Purchased Loans
One-to-four family residential	$	126,915	$	5,948
Multi-family residential		11,963		1,167
Construction		—		—
Commercial		32,322		8,834
Consumer		1,058		1,302
Total	$	172,258	$	17,251

	March 31, 2011
	One-to four Family Residential			Multi-family Residential		Construction			Commercial		Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	979		$	49	$	33		$	180	$	1	$	1,242
Provision		49			73		-			26		2		150
Charge-offs		(26	)		-		(21	)		-		-		(47	)
Recoveries		-			-		-			-		-		-
Ending balance	$	1,002		$	122	$	12		$	206	$	3	$	1,345
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	356		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	356
Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	646		$	122	$	12		$	206	$	3	$	989
Loans receivable:
Ending balance	$	322,526		$	23,584	$	5,609		$	62,167	$	3,692	$	417,578
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment (1)	$	131,209		$	14,219	$	-		$	33,824	$	2,178	$	181,430
Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	183,140		$	8,255	$	5,609		$	19,428	$	237	$	216,669
Ending balance:
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	8,177		$	1,110	$	-		$	8,915	$	1,277	$	19,479

(1) Includes loans acquired from First Franklin of $175,776

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

12. Financing ~~receivables~~Receivables (continued)

	December 31, 2010
	One-to four Family Residential			Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial			Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	892		$	30	$	28	$	75		$	-	$	1,025
Provision		364			19		5		161			1		550
Charge-offs		(277	)		-		-		(56	)		-		(333	)
Recoveries		-			-		-		-			-		-
Ending balance	$	979		$	49	$	33	$	180		$	1	$	1,242
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	217		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	217
Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	762		$	49	$	33	$	180		$	1	$	1,025
Ending balance:
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-

The following summarizes activity in the allowance for credit losses:

	June 30, 2011
	One-to four Family Residential			Multi-family Residential		Construction			Commercial		Consumer		Total

Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	979		$	49	$	33		$	180	$	1	$	1,242
Provision		56			104		4			21		15		200
Charge-offs		(35	)		—		(21	)		—		—		(56	)
Recoveries		—			—		—			—		13		13

Ending balance	$	1,000		$	153	$	16		$	201	$	29	$	1,399

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	364		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	364
Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	636		$	153	$	16		$	201	$	29	$	1,035

Loans receivable:

Ending balance	$	317,281		$	23,483	$	7,406		$	61,952	$	2,636	$	412,758
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment (1)	$	131,728		$	11,963	$	—		$	32,528	$	1,058	$	177,277
Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	179,605		$	10,353	$	7,406		$	20,590	$	276	$	218,230
Ending balance:
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	5,948		$	1,167	$	—		$	8,834	$	1,302	$	17,251

(1) Includes loans acquired from First Franklin of $171,709

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

12. Financing receivables (continued)

	December 31, 2010
	One-to four Family Residential			Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial			Consumer		Total
Loans receivable:
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance	$	195,801		$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,329		$	207	$	231,012
Beginning balance	$	892		$	30	$	28	$	75		$	—	$	1,025
Provision		364			19		5		161			1		550
Charge-offs		(277	)		—		—		(56	)		—		(333	)
Recoveries		—			—		—		—			—		—
Ending balance	$	979		$	49	$	33	$	180		$	1	$	1,242
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	~~4,989~~217		$	-—	$	-—	$	~~222~~—		$	-—	$	~~5,211~~217
Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	~~190,812~~762		$	~~8,594~~49	$	~~7,081~~33	$	~~19,107~~180		$	~~207~~1	$	~~225~~1,~~801~~025
Ending balance:
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	-—		$	-—	$	-—	$	-—		$	-—	$	-—

The Company assigns credit risk grades to evaluated loans using grading standards employed by regulatory agencies. Loans judged to carry lower-risk attributes assigned a “pass” grade, with a minimal likelihood of loss. Loans judged to carry a higher-risk attributes are referred to as “classified loans” and are further disaggregated, with increasing expectations for loss recognition, as “substandard”, “doubtful”, and “loss”. The Loan Classification of Assets committee assigns the credit risk grades to loans and reports to the board on a monthly basis the “classified asset” report.


	December 31, 2010
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Loans receivable:

Ending balance	$	195,801	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,329	$	207	$	231,012

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,989	$	—	$	—	$	222	$	—	$	5,211

Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	190,812	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,107	$	207	$	225,801

Ending balance:
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		—		—

The following table summarizes the credit risk profile by internally assigned grade:

	Originated Loans at March 31, 2011
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	183,140	$	8,255	$	5,609	$	19,428	$	237	$	216,669
Special mention		-		-		-		-		-		-
Substandard		5,432		-		-		222		-		5,654
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	188,572	$	8,255	$	5,609	$	19,650	$	237	$	222,323

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

12. Financing receivables (continued)

	Loans Receivable at December 31, 2010
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	190,812	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,107	$	207	$	225,801
Special mention		-		-		-		-		-		-
Substandard		4,989		-		-		222		-		5,211
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	195,801	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,329	$	207	$	231,012

The Corporation assigns credit risk grades to evaluated loans using grading standards employed by regulatory agencies. Loans judged to carry lower-risk attributes assigned a “pass” grade, with a minimal likelihood of loss. Loans judged to carry a higher-risk attributes are referred to as “classified loans” and are further disaggregated, with increasing expectations for loss recognition, as “substandard,” “doubtful,” and “loss.” The Corporation’s Loan Classification of Assets committee assigns the credit risk grades to loans and reports to the board on a monthly basis the “classified asset” report.

	Purchased Loans at March 31, 2011
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	120,862	$	15,007	$	-	$	32,983	$	5,207	$	174,059
Special mention		2,685		107		-		7,670		30		10,492
Substandard		6,066		424		-		4,235		406		11,131
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	129,613	$	15,538	$	-	$	44,888	$	5,643	$	195,682

The following table summarizes the credit risk profile by internally assigned grade:

The following tables summarizes loans by delinquency, nonaccrual status and impaired loans:


	Originated Loans at June 30, 2011
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	179,056	$	10,353	$	7,406	$	20,590	$	276	$	217,681
Special mention		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard		5,362		—		—		206		—		5,568
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	184,418	$	10,353	$	7,406	$	20,796	$	276	$	223,249

Age Analysis of Past Due Originated Loans Receivable


	Loans Receivable at December 31, 2010
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	190,812	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,107	$	207	$	225,801
Special mention		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard		4,989		—		—		222		—		5,211
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	195,801	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,329	$	207	$	231,012

As of March 31, 2011


	Purchased Loans at June 30, 2011
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	124,890	$	12,737	$	—	$	36,047	$	1,961	$	175,635
Special mention		259		353		—		1,057		—		1,669
Substandard		7,714		40		—		4,052		399		12,205
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	132,863	$	13,130	$	—	$	41,156	$	2,360	$	189,509

	30-89 Days Past Due		Over 90 days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current and Accruing		Nonaccrual		Total Loans		Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	670	$	4,104	$	4,774	$	184,468	$	4,104	$	188,572		-
Multi-family Residential		-		-		-		8,255		-		8,255		-
Construction		-		-		-		5,609		-		5,609		-
Commercial		54		205		259		19,445		205		19,650		-
Consumer		-		-		-		237		-		237		-
Total	$	724	$	4,309	$	5,033	$	218,014	$	4,309	$	222,323		-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

12. Financing receivables (continued)

~~Age~~The ~~Analysis~~following oftable ~~Past~~summarizes ~~Due~~loans ~~Originated~~by ~~Loans~~delinquency, ~~Receivable~~nonaccrual status and impaired loans:

As of December 31, 2010

	Age Analysis of Past Due Originated Loans Receivable As of June 30, 2011
	30-89 Days Past Due		Over 90 days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current and Accruing		Nonaccrual		Total Loans		Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing
Real Estate:
1-4 family
Residential	$	729	$	5,041	$	5,770	$	179,377	$	5,041	$	184,418		—
Multi-family
Residential		—		—		—		10,353		—		10,353		—
Construction		—		—		—		7,406		—		7,406		—
Commercial		—		207		207		20,589		207		20,796		—
Consumer		—		—		—		276		—		276		—
Total	$	729	$	5,248	$	5,977	$	218,001	$	5,248	$	223,249		—

	Age Analysis of Past Due Originated Loans Receivable As of December 31, 2010
	30-89 Days Past Due		Over 90 days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current and accruing		Nonaccrual		Total Loans		Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	1,017	$	4,695	$	5,712	$	191,106	$	4,695	$	195,801		-
1-4 family
Multi-family Residential		-		-		-		8,594		-		8,594		-
Residential	$	1,017	$	4,695	$	5,712	$	191,106	$	4,695	$	195,801		—
Construction		-		-		-		7,081		-		7,081		-
Multi-family
Commercial		46		160		206		19,169		160		19,329		-
Residential		—		—		—		8,594		—		8,594		—
Consumer		-		-		-		207		-		207		-
Construction		—		—		—		7,081		—		7,081		—
Total	$	1,063	$	4,855	$	5,918	$	226,157	$	4,855	$	231,012		-
Commercial		46		160		206		19,169		160		19,329		—
Consumer		—		—		—		207		—		207		—
Total	$	1,063	$	4,855	$	5,918	$	226,157	$	4,855	$	231,012		—

Age Analysis of Past Due Purchased Loans Receivable


	Age Analysis of Past Due Purchased Loans Receivable As of June 30, 2011
	30-89 Days Past Due		Over 90 days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current and Accruing		Nonaccrual		Total Loans		Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing
Real Estate:
1-4 family
Residential	$	2,679	$	3,734	$	6,413	$	129,129	$	3,734	$	132,863		—
Multi-family
Residential		—		488		488		12,642		488		13,130		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial		329		638		967		40,518		638		41,156		—
Consumer		—		56		56		2,304		56		2,360		—
Total	$	3,008	$	4,916	$	7,924	$	184,593	$	4,916	$	189,509		—

As of March 31, 2011

	30-89 Days Past Due		Over 90 days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current and Accruing		Nonaccrual		Total Loans		Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	873	$	4,790	$	5,663	$	129,164	$	4,790	$	133,954		-
Multi-family Residential		-		14		14		15,315		14		15,329		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		1,917		1,917		40,600		1,917		42,517		-
Consumer		9		22		31		3,433		22		3,455		-
Total	$	882	$	6,743	$	7,625	$	188,512	$	6,743	$	195,255		-

Impaired Loans

As of March 31, 2011

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Purchased loans with no related allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	8,177	$	8,177	$	-	$	102	$	10
Multi-family Residential		1,110		1,110		-		185		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		8,915		8,915		-		469		5
Consumer		1,277		1,277		-		40		3
Total	$	19,479	$	19,479	$	-	$	796	$	18

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

12. Financing receivables (continued)

	Impaired Loans As of March 31, 2011
	Impaired Loans As of June 30, 2011
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
Purchased loans with no related allowance recorded:
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
Originated loans with no related allowance recorded
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	45,~~775~~948	$	45,~~775~~948	$	-—	$	~~104~~83	$	854
Commercial		222		222		-		111		-
Multi-family Residential		1,167		1,167		—		195		—
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	4,997	$	4,997	$	-	$	215	$	8
Commercial		8,834		8,834		—		442		6
Originated loans with an allowance recorded:
Consumer		1,302		1,302		—		41		—
Real Estate:
Total	$	17,251	$	17,251	$	—	$	133	$	60
1-4 family Residential	$	465	$	821	$	356	$	39	$	-
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	465	$	821	$	356	$	39	$	-
Total:
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	13,417	$	13,773	$	356	$	245	$	18
Multi-family Residential		1,110		1,110		-		185		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		9,137		9,137		-		580		5
Consumer		1,277		1,277		-		40		3
Total	$	24,941	$	25,297	$	356	$	1,050	$	26

	Impaired Loans As of December 31, 2010
	Impaired Loans As of June 30, 2011
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
Originated loans with no related allowance recorded
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
Originated loans
with no related
allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	4,~~038~~985	$	4,~~038~~985	$	-—	$	104	$	~~126~~40
Residential
Commercial		46		46		—		46		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	5,031	$	5,031	$	—	$	114	$	40
Originated loans with an allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	284	$	640	$	356	$	29	$	—
Residential
Commercial		152		160		8		151
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	436	$	800	$	364	$	180	$	—
Total:
Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	11,217	$	11,573	$	356	$	87	$	94
Residential
Multi-family
Residential		-1,167		-1,167		-—		-195		-—
Construction		-—		-—		-—		-—		-—
Commercial		~~222~~9,032		~~222~~9,040		-—		~~111~~411		26
Consumer		-1,302		-1,302		-8		-41		-—
Total	$	422,~~260~~718	$	423,~~260~~082	$	-364	$	~~215~~120	$	~~128~~100

Cheviot Financial Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010

12. Financing receivables (continued)

	Impaired Loans
	Impaired Loans As of December 31, 2010
	As of December 31, 2010
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance			Related Allowance			Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
				Unpaid							Average		Interest
Originated loans with no related allowance recorded: Real Estate:
	Recorded			Principal				Related			Recorded		Income
1-4 family Residential	$	4,038	$	4,038		$	—		$	104	$	126
	Investment			Balance				Allowance			Investment		Recognized
Multi-family Residential		—		—			—			—		—
Originated with
Construction		—		—			—			—		—
an allowance recorded:
Commercial		222		222			—			111		2
Real Estate:
Consumer		—		—			—			—		—
1-4 family Residential	$	734		$	951			$	217		$	56	$	9
Total	$	4,260	$	4,260		$	—		$	215	$	128
Multi-family Residential		-			-				-			-		-
Construction		-			-				-			-		-
Commercial		-			-				-			-		-
Consumer		-			-				-			-		-
Total	$	734		$	951			$	217		$	56	$	9
Total:
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	4,772		$	4,989			$	217		$	160	$	135
Multi-family Residential		-			-				-			-		-
Construction		-			-				-			-		-
Commercial		222			222				-			111		2
Consumer		-			-				-			-		-
Total	$	4,994		$	5,211			$	217		$	203	$	137

13. Sale-leaseback Transaction


	Impaired Loans As of December 31, 2010
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Originated with an allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
1-4 family Residential	$	734	$	951	$	217	$	56	$	9
Multi-family Residential		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	734	$	951	$	217	$	56	$	9
Total:
Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	4,772	$	4,989	$	217	$	160	$	135
Residential
Multi-family
Residential		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial		222		222		—		111		2
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	4,994	$	5,211	$	217	$	203	$	137

The Corporation assumed a sales-leaseback liability of First Franklin in the acquisition totaling $1.2 million. First Franklin’s main office was sold in 2010 to an unrelated party and leased back under a 15 year lease that requires annual lease payments of approximately $132,000. Future minimum payments under the finance obligation are as follows:

	(in thousands)
2011	$	99
2012		136
2013		139
2014		143
2015		146
Thereafter		1,553
	$	2,216

Cheviot Financial Corp.

~~ITEM~~NOTES ~~2. MANAGEMENT’S~~TO ~~DISCUSSION~~CONSOLIDATED ~~AND ANALYSIS OF~~ FINANCIAL ~~CONDITION~~STATEMENTS ~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~(CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

13. Subsequent Events

Adoption of Plan of Conversion

On July 12, 2011 Cheviot Mutual Holding Company and the Corporation adopted a Plan of Conversion whereby the mutual holding company would convert from mutual to stock form. As part of the Plan of Conversion the pro forma value of the 62% of the Corporation owed by the Mutual Holding Company would be sold in a subscription and community offering and, if necessary, a syndicated community offering. The Plan of Conversion is subject to regulatory approval as well as the approval of the Mutual Holding Company’s members and the Corporation’s stockholders.

Subsequent Event – Sunset of Office of Thrift Supervision

Effective July 21, 2011 Cheviot Financial Corp. became subject to regulation and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Savings Bank became regulated by the FDIC, in each case, instead of the Office of Thrift Supervision. Compliance with new regulations and being supervised by one or more new regulatory agencies could increase our expenses.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

ITEM 2.

Forward Looking Statements

This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of such words as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could affect the actual outcome of future events. Because of these uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements.

Recent Developments

Adoption of Plan of Conversion

Acquisition of First Franklin Corporation

On March 16, 2011, Cheviot Financial, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cheviot Savings Bank, completed the acquisition of First Franklin and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Franklin Savings. The acquisition was consummated in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of October 12, 2010, by and among Cheviot Financial Corp., Cheviot Savings Bank, Cheviot Merger Subsidiary, Inc., First Franklin and Franklin Savings.

The business combination resulted in the acquisition of loans with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration. First Franklin’s loans were deemed impaired at the acquisition date if Cheviot Financial did not expect to receive all contractually required cash flows due to concerns about credit quality. Such loans were fair valued and the difference between contractually required payments at the acquisition date and cash flows expected to be collected was recorded as a nonaccretable difference. At the acquisition date, Cheviot Financial recorded $25.0 million of purchased credit-impaired loans subject to a ~~nonaccretable~~fair ~~difference~~value adjustment of $5.5 million. The method of measuring carrying value of purchased loans differs from loans originated by the ~~Company~~Corporation (originated loans), and as such, the ~~Company~~Corporation identifies purchased loans and purchased loans with a credit quality discount and originated loans at amortized cost.

As a result of the acquisition, the Corporation now has a total of 13 branches located in Hamilton County. One branch is expected to be closed in May 2011. At acquisition, First Franklin had total assets of $265.8 million, deposits of $218.8 million and stockholders’ equity of $16.4 million. We recognize that components of our non-interest expense will increase as we integrate the personnel and operations of First Franklin. We believe however that these costs will more than be offset by the synergies which can be expected from a larger financial institution and the enhanced profitability potential we will have operating as an institution with over $600 million in assets.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF ~~FINANCIAL CONDITION~~

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Recent Developments (continued)

First Franklin's loans without evidence of credit deterioration were fair valued by discounting both expected principal and interest cash flows using an observable discount rate for similar instruments that a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Additionally, consideration was given to management’s best estimates of default rates and payment speeds. At acquisition, First Franklin’s loan portfolio without evidence of credit deterioration totaled $173.2 million and was recorded at a fair value of $171.6 million.

As a result of the acquisition, the Corporation now has a total of 12 branches located in Hamilton County. At acquisition, First Franklin had total assets of $265.8 million, deposits of $218.8 million and stockholders’ equity of $16.4 million. We recognize that components of our non-interest expense will increase as we integrate the personnel and operations of First Franklin. We believe however that these costs will more than be offset by the synergies which can be expected from a larger financial institution and the enhanced profitability potential we will have operating as an institution with approximately $600 million in assets.

Legislative Developments

OnEffective July 21, ~~2010,~~2011 ~~President~~Cheviot ~~Obama~~Financial ~~signed~~Corp. ~~into~~became ~~law~~subject to regulation and supervision by the ~~financial~~Board ~~regulatory~~of ~~reform~~Governors ~~act~~of ~~entitled~~the Federal Reserve System and the ~~“Dodd-Frank~~Savings ~~Wall~~Bank ~~Street~~became ~~Reform~~regulated ~~and~~by ~~Consumer~~the ~~Protection~~FDIC, ~~Act”~~in ~~that~~each ~~implements~~case, ~~changes~~instead toof the ~~regulation~~Office of ~~the~~Thrift ~~financial~~Supervision. Compliance ~~services~~with ~~industry,~~new ~~including~~regulations ~~provisions~~and ~~that,~~being ~~among~~supervised ~~other~~by ~~things:~~one or more new regulatory agencies could increase our expenses.

o Centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws. o Apply the same leverage and risk-based capital requirements that apply to insured depository institutions to bank holding companies. o Require the FDIC to seek to make its capital requirements for banks countercyclical so that the amount of capital required to be maintained increases in times of economic expansion and decreases in times of economic contraction. o Change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible capital. o Implement corporate governance revisions, including with regard to executive compensation and proxy access by shareholders that apply to all public companies, not just financial institutions. o Make permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and increase the cash limit of Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection from $100,000 to $250,000, and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013, for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions. o Repeal the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on business transaction and other accounts. o Increase the authority of the Federal Reserve to examine the Corporation and its non-bank subsidiaries.

Cheviot Financial Corp. will become a bank holding company subject to regulation and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Savings Bank will be regulated by the FDIC, in each case, instead of the Office of Thrift Supervision. As a bank holding company, Cheviot Financial Corp. will become subject to regulatory capital requirements it is not currently subject to as a savings and loan holding company and certain additional restrictions on its activities. In addition, compliance with new regulations and being supervised by one or more new regulatory agencies could increase our expenses.

Many aspects of the act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on the Corporation, its customers or the financial industry. Provisions in the legislation that affect deposit insurance assessments and payment of interest on demand deposits could increase the costs associated with deposits as well as place limitations on certain revenues those deposits may generate.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the accounting method used for the allowance for loan losses and the estimation of fair value of assets to be a critical accounting ~~policy~~policies.

The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover inherent, but unconfirmed credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for losses on loans which is charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, management makes significant estimates and has identified this policy as one of the most critical for Cheviot Financial.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the allowance for loan losses. Consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlining collateral, the financial strength of the borrower, results of internal loan ~~review~~reviews and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.

The analysis has two components, specific and general allocations. Specific percentage allocations ~~are~~can be made for unconfirmed losses related to loans that are determined to be impaired. Impairment is measured by determining the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses. If the fair value of the loan is less than the loan’s carrying value, a charge-off is recorded for the difference. The general allocation is determined by segregating the remaining loans by type of loan, risk weighting (if applicable) and payment history. We also analyze historical loss experience, delinquency trends, general economic conditions and geographic and industry concentrations. ~~This~~ This analysis establishes factors that are applied to the loan groups to determine the amount of the general ~~allowance~~ reserve. Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowances we have established which could result in a material negative effect on our financial results.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities of First Franklin were measured at estimated fair values, as required by FASB under Business Combinations. Management made significant estimates and exercised significant judgment in accounting for the acquisition. Management measured loan fair values based on loan file reviews (including borrower financial statements or tax returns), appraised collateral values, expected cash flows and historical loss factors of Franklin Savings. Real estate acquired through foreclosure was primarily valued based on appraised collateral values. The Corporation also recorded an identifiable intangible asset representing the core deposit base of Franklin Savings based on management’s evaluation of the cost of such deposits relative to alternative funding sources. Management used significant estimates including the average lives of depository accounts, future interest rate levels, the cost of servicing various depository products and other significant estimates. Management used market quotations to determine the fair value of investment securities and FHLB advances.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Critical Accounting Policies (continued)

The acquired assets of First Franklin and Franklin Savings include loans receivable. Loans receivable acquired with a deteriorated credit quality amounted to $25.0 million with a related credit quality discount of $5.5 million. The method of measuring carrying value of purchased loans differs from loans originated by the Corporation, and as such, the Corporation identifies purchased loans and purchased loans with a credit quality discount.

We classify our investments in debt and equity securities as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Securities classified as held-to maturity are recorded at cost or amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. We obtain our estimated fair values from a third party service. This service’s fair value calculations are based on quoted market prices when such prices are available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimates of fair value are computed using a variety of techniques, including extrapolation from the quoted prices of similar instruments or recent trades for thinly traded securities, fundamental analysis, or through obtaining purchase quotes. Due to the subjective nature of the valuation process, it is possible that the actual fair values of these investments could differ from the estimated amounts, thereby affecting our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. If the estimated value of investments is less than the cost or amortized cost, we evaluate whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. If such an event or change has occurred and we determine that the impairment is other-than-temporary, we expense the impairment of the investment in the period in which the event or change occurred. We also consider how long a security has been in a loss position in determining if it is other than temporarily impaired. Management also assesses the nature of the unrealized losses taking into consideration factors such as changes in risk -free interest rates, general credit spread widening, market supply and demand, creditworthiness of the issuer, and quality of the underlying collateral.

Discussion of Financial Condition Changes at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 and at ~~March~~December 31, ~~2011~~2010

Total assets increased $~~249~~239.41 million, or 6966.68%, to $~~607~~597.41 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, from $358.1 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in total assets is primarily the result of the First Franklin acquisition. As a result of the acquisition, Cheviot Financial Corp. recorded increases in cash and cash equivalents, ~~investment securities,~~ mortgage-backed securities and loans receivable.

Cash, federal funds and interest-earning deposits increased $5.5 million, or 30.5% to $23.7 million at March 31, 2011. The increase in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2011 was due to a $6.5 million increase in interest-earning deposits, which was partially offset by a decrease in cash and due from banks of $271,000 and a decrease in federal funds sold of $695,000. Investment securities increased $11.1 million, or 12.6%, to $99.5 million at March 31, 2011. The increase in investment securities is primarily the result of $15.6 million in investment securities acquired from First Franklin, offset by approximately $5.0 million of investments securities maturities. At March 31, 2011, all investment securities were classified as available for sale.

Mortgage-backed securities increased $4.2 million, or 46.0%, to $13.2 million at March 31, 2011, from $9.1 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in mortgage-backed securities was due primarily to $4.5 million of mortgage-backed securities designated as available for sale acquired from First Franklin. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were principal prepayments and repayments totaling approximately $496,000. At March 31, 2011, $8.6 million of mortgage-backed securities were classified as available for sale, while $4.6 million were classified as held to maturity. As of March 31, 2011, none of the mortgage-backed securities were considered other than temporarily impaired.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Discussion of Financial Condition Changes at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 and at ~~March~~December 31, ~~2011~~2010 (continued)

~~Loans receivable~~Cash, ~~including~~federal ~~loans~~funds ~~held~~sold ~~for~~and ~~sale,~~interest-earning deposits increased $~~188~~15.9 million, or 8387.83%, to $~~414~~34.40 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, from $~~225~~18.41 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in ~~loans~~cash ~~receivable~~and iscash ~~the~~equivalents ~~result~~at ofJune ~~acquiring~~30, ~~approximately~~2011 was due to a $~~198~~10.7 million inincrease ~~net loans receivable~~ in ~~the~~federal ~~First~~funds ~~Franklin~~sold, ~~acquisition~~a $3. In0 ~~addition,~~million ~~the~~increase ~~change~~ in ~~net~~interest-earning ~~loans~~deposits ~~receivable~~and ~~reflects~~a ~~loan sales totaling~~ $92.52 million increase in cash and ~~loan~~due ~~principal~~from ~~repayments~~banks. We ofacquired $1120.5 million, ~~which~~in ~~were~~cash ~~partially~~and ~~offset~~cash byequivalents ~~loan~~in ~~originations~~the ofFirst ~~$14.0~~Franklin ~~million~~acquisition. Investment ~~The~~securities ~~change~~decreased in$366,000 ~~the~~to ~~composition~~$88.0 ofmillion ~~the~~at ~~Corporation’s~~June ~~assets~~30, ~~reflects~~2011. ~~management’s~~At ~~decision~~June to30, ~~take~~2011, ~~advantage~~all ofinvestment ~~opportunities~~securities towere ~~obtain~~classified aas ~~higher~~available ~~rate~~for ofsale. ~~return~~As byof ~~selling~~June ~~certain~~30, ~~mortgage~~2011, ~~loans~~none ~~and~~of ~~recording~~our ~~gains,~~investment ~~while~~securities ~~simultaneously~~are ~~mitigating~~considered ~~interest rate risk~~impaired.

~~The~~Mortgage-backed ~~allowance~~securities ~~for~~increased ~~loan losses totaled~~ $13.48 million, ~~and~~or 41.8%, to $112.28 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~and December 31~~, ~~2010,~~from ~~respectively~~$9. In1 ~~determining~~million ~~the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses~~ at ~~any~~December ~~point in time~~31, ~~management and the board of directors apply a systematic process focusing on the risk of loss in the portfolio~~2010. ~~First,~~The ~~the~~increase ~~loan~~in ~~portfolio~~mortgage-backed issecurities ~~segregated~~was bydue ~~loan~~primarily ~~types~~ to be$4.5 ~~evaluated~~million ~~collectively~~of ~~and loan types to be evaluated individually. Delinquent multi~~mortgage-~~family~~backed ~~and~~securities ~~commercial~~designated ~~loans~~as ~~are~~available ~~evaluated individually~~ for ~~potential~~sale ~~impairments~~acquired infrom ~~their~~First ~~carrying value~~Franklin. ~~Second,~~During the ~~allowance~~six ~~for~~months loan losses entails utilizing our historic loss experience by applying such loss percentage to the loan types to be collectively evaluated in the portfolio. The $150,000 provision for losses on loans during the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~is a reflection of these factors~~, ~~weaker~~there ~~economic~~were ~~conditions~~principal inprepayments ~~the greater Cincinnati area,~~ and ~~the~~repayments ~~need~~totaling ~~to provide~~ approximately $~~131~~945,000. At inJune ~~specific~~30, ~~reserves~~2011, ~~for four residential properties with principal balances totaling~~ $~~202,000~~4. ~~The~~5 ~~analysis~~million of ~~the~~mortgage-backed ~~allowance~~securities ~~for~~were ~~loan~~classified ~~losses~~as ~~requires~~held ~~an element of judgment and is subject~~ to ~~the possibility that the allowance may need to be increased~~maturity, ~~with~~while ~~a corresponding reduction in earnings~~$8.4 Asmillion ~~stated~~were ~~previously,~~classified ~~Cheviot~~as ~~Financial’s~~available ~~allowance~~for ~~at March 31, 2011 does not include any credit quality discount related to loans acquired from First Franklin~~sale. ToAs ~~the best~~ of ~~management’s~~June ~~knowledge~~30, ~~all~~2011, ~~known~~none ~~and~~of ~~inherent~~the ~~losses~~mortgage-backed ~~that~~securities are ~~probable~~considered ~~and~~other ~~that~~than ~~can~~temporarily ~~be reasonably estimated have been recorded at March 31, 2011~~impaired.

~~Non-performing~~Loans ~~and~~receivable, ~~impaired~~including loans ~~totaled~~held for sale, increased $4182.32 million, ~~and~~or 80.8%, to $4407.97 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~and~~from $225.4 million at December 31, 2010~~, respectively~~. AtThe ~~March~~increase ~~31,~~in ~~2011,~~loans ~~non-performing~~receivable ~~and~~is ~~impaired~~the ~~loans~~result ~~were comprised~~ of ~~eighty-nine~~acquiring ~~loans~~approximately ~~secured~~$198.7 bymillion ~~one-~~in tonet ~~four-family~~loans ~~residential~~receivable ~~real~~in ~~estate~~the ~~and~~First $2Franklin acquisition.0 In ~~million~~addition, the change in ~~non-residential~~net loans. Atreceivable ~~March~~reflects ~~31,~~loan ~~2011~~sales ~~and~~of ~~December~~15 ~~31,~~or ~~2010~~30 ~~real~~year ~~estate~~fixed ~~acquired~~rate ~~through~~mortgage ~~foreclosure~~loans ~~was~~totaling $418.58 million and loan principal repayments of $229.08 million, ~~respectively. The~~which ~~allowance~~were ~~for~~partially offset by loan ~~losses~~originations ~~represented~~of 20$35.8%3 ~~and 25~~million.6% The acquisition of ~~Cheviot~~First ~~Financial’s~~Franklin ~~non-performing~~resulted ~~and~~in ~~impaired~~changes ~~loans~~to atthe ~~March~~overall ~~31,~~composition ~~2011~~of ~~and~~the ~~December~~loan ~~31, 2010, respectively~~portfolio. ~~Although~~The ~~management~~portfolio ~~believes~~is ~~that~~currently ~~the~~comprised ~~Corporation’s~~of ~~allowance~~approximately ~~for~~48% ~~loan~~in ~~losses~~fixed ~~conforms~~rate ~~with~~mortgages ~~generally~~and ~~accepted~~52% ~~accounting~~in ~~principles~~variable ~~based~~rate ~~upon~~mortgages. In ~~the~~addition, ~~available~~as ~~facts~~a ~~and~~result ~~circumstances,~~of ~~there~~the ~~can~~acquisition, bethe noCompany ~~assurance~~increased ~~that~~the ~~additions~~amount toof ~~the~~commercial ~~allowance~~loans ~~will~~to ~~not~~15.0% beof ~~necessary~~total inloans ~~future~~compared ~~periods,~~to ~~which~~8.4% ~~would~~of ~~adversely~~total ~~affect~~loans ~~our~~at ~~results~~December of31, ~~operations~~2010.

~~Deposits~~The ~~increased~~allowance ~~$223.2~~for ~~million~~loan orlosses 86totaled $1.~~6%,~~4 tomillion and $~~481.~~1.2 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~from~~and ~~$257.9 million at~~ December 31, 2010, respectively. ~~The~~In ~~increase~~determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at any point in ~~deposits~~time, asmanagement aand ~~result~~the board of directors apply a systematic process focusing on the ~~acquisition~~risk ~~was~~of ~~approximately~~loss ~~$218.8~~in ~~million~~the portfolio. ~~Advances~~First, ~~from~~ the ~~Federal~~loan ~~Home~~portfolio ~~Loan~~is ~~Bank~~segregated ofby ~~Cincinnati~~loan ~~increased~~types byto ~~$19.7~~be ~~million,~~evaluated orcollectively ~~72.2%,~~and loan types to ~~$47~~be evaluated individually.0 Delinquent ~~million~~multi-family atand ~~March~~commercial ~~31,~~loans ~~2011,~~are ~~from~~evaluated ~~$27.3~~individually ~~million~~for atpotential ~~December~~impairments ~~31,~~in ~~2010~~their carrying value. ~~The~~Second, ~~increase~~the isallowance afor ~~result~~loan oflosses ~~assuming~~entails ~~$22.4~~utilizing ~~million~~our inhistoric ~~advances~~loss asexperience aby ~~result~~applying ofsuch loss percentage to the ~~acquisition~~loan ~~with~~types ~~First~~to ~~Franklin~~be ~~Corporation~~collectively evaluated in the portfolio. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the Corporation ~~had~~recorded ~~proceeds~~a ~~from~~$200,000 ~~Federal~~provision ~~Home~~for ~~Loan~~loan ~~Bank~~losses ~~advances~~reflecting these factors as well as replenishing the allowance for charge-offs. The analysis of ~~$11~~the allowance for loan losses requires an element of judgment and is subject to the possibility that the allowance may need to be increased, with a corresponding reduction in earnings.0 Under ~~million~~applicable accounting guidelines, ~~which~~loans acquired in the acquisition were ~~partially~~marked ~~offset~~to byfair ~~repayments~~value. Therefore, as of ~~$14~~June 30, 2011, the Company has not provided loan losses for the loans acquired in the acquisition.5 To ~~million~~the best of management’s knowledge, all known and inherent losses that are probable and that can be reasonably estimated have been recorded at June 30, 2011.

Shareholders’ equity increased $341,000, or 0.5%, from December 31, 2010. The increase primarily resulted from net earnings of $552,000 and a decrease in unrealized losses on securities of $200,000, which was partially offset by dividends paid of $408,000. Dividends declared by the Corporation were waived by the Corporation’s mutual holding company parent. At March 31, 2011, Cheviot Financial had the ability to purchase an additional 360,818 shares under its announced stock repurchase plan.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Discussion of Financial Condition Changes at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 and at ~~March~~December 31, ~~2011~~2010 (continued)

Non-performing and impaired loans totaled $5.5 million and $4.9 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. At June 30, 2011, non-performing and impaired loans were comprised of 43 loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate and two loans secured by nonresidential real estate. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, real estate acquired through foreclosure totaled $3.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The allowance for loan losses represented 25.6% and 24.9% of non-performing and impaired loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Although management believes that the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses conforms to generally accepted accounting principles based upon the available facts and circumstances, there can be no assurance that additions to the allowance will not be necessary in future periods, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Deposits increased $217.0 million, or 84.2%, to $474.8 million at June 30, 2011, from $257.9 million at December 31, 2010. Deposits assumed at the time of the acquisition were approximately $218.8 million, net of a fair value adjustment of $2.7 million. Deposits acquired include savings deposits totaling approximately $77.7 million and time deposits of approximately $141.1 million with an overall average rate of 1.90%. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati increased by $16.9 million, or 62.1%, to $44.2 million at June 30, 2011, from $27.3 million at December 31, 2010. The increase is a result of assuming $22.4 million in advances as a result of the acquisition of First Franklin. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation had proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $11.0 million, which was partially offset by repayments of $17.2 million.

Shareholders’ equity increased $1.9 million, or 2.8%, to $71.3 million at June 30, 2011, from $69.4 million at December 31, 2010. The increase primarily resulted from net earnings of $1.5 million and amortization of stock benefit plans of $18,000, which were partially offset by dividends paid of $816,000. Dividends declared by the Corporation were waived by the Corporation’s mutual holding parent company. At June 30, 2011, Cheviot Financial had the ability to purchase an additional 360,818 shares under its announced stock repurchase plan. The repurchase plan has been suspended as a result of Cheviot Mutual Holding Company’s adoption of a Plan of Conversion providing for the conversion of our mutual holding company to stock form and the related stock offering.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis using reports that recap all deposit activity and loan commitments. A significant portion of our deposit base is ~~comprised~~made up of time deposits. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, $~~153~~143.27 million of time deposits are due to mature within ~~one~~twelve ~~year~~months. The daily deposit activity report allows us to price our time deposits competitively. Because of this and our deposit retention experience, we anticipate that a significant portion of maturing time deposits will be retained. ~~At March 31, 2011, we had loan commitments of $537,000. Our loan commitments are funded or expire within 45 days from the date of the commitment.~~

Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati increased $1916.79 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. We have the ability to increase such borrowings by approximately $~~125~~159.5 million. The additional borrowings can be used to offset any decrease in customer deposits or to fund loan commitments. ~~The Corporation’s other borrowings were primarily limited to $1.4 million of lease obligations.~~

~~Comparison of Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010~~37

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

General

Net earnings for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 totaled $~~552~~1.5 million,~~000,~~ a $49374,000 increase from the $~~503,000~~1.1 inmillion of net earnings reported for the ~~March~~same ~~2010~~ period in 2010. The increase in net earnings reflects ana ~~increase~~growth in net interest income of $161.8 million,~~000,~~ an increase in other income of $78818,000, and a ~~decline~~decrease in the provision for federal income taxes of $~~267~~332,000, ~~all of~~ which were partially offset by an increase of $100,000 in the provision for losses on loans ~~of $110,000~~ and an increase of $2.5 million in general, administrative and other expense ~~of $202,000~~.

Net Interest Income

Total interest income ~~decreased~~increased $602.2 million,~~000,~~ or 127.50%, to $310.92 million for the ~~three~~six-months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, from the comparable ~~quarter~~period in 2010. Interest income on loans ~~decreased~~increased $~~118~~1.9 million,~~000,~~ or 328.41%, to $38.49 million during the 2011 period ~~from $3~~.~~5 million for the 2010 period.~~ This ~~decrease~~increase was due primarily to aan 47increase ~~basis~~of ~~point~~$91.6 ~~decrease~~million, inor ~~the weighted-average yield to 5~~37.255%, ~~from~~in ~~5.72%~~average loans outstanding, which was partially offset by ana ~~increase~~decrease in the average ~~balance~~yield ofon loans ~~outstanding~~to ~~of $12~~5.727% ~~million,~~for orthe 2011 period from 5.266% infor the ~~2011~~2010 ~~quarter~~period.

Interest income on mortgage-backed securities decreased $3625,000, or 4115.94%, to $50137,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, from $86162,000 for the ~~2010~~same ~~quarter~~period in 2010, due primarily to a ~~126~~78 basis point decrease in the average yield, ~~and~~which was partially offset by a $~~651,000~~1.2 ~~decrease~~million increase in the average balance of securities ~~outstanding period to period~~. Interest income on investment securities increased $84185,000, or 2221.58%, to $~~457,000~~1.0 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to $~~373~~848,000 for the same ~~quarter~~period in 2010, due primarily to an increase of $2629.56 million, or 4145.98%, increase in the average balance of investment securities outstanding, which was partially offset by a ~~32 basis point~~ decrease in the average yield of 43 basis points to 2.0420% in the 2011 ~~quarter~~period. Interest income on other interest-earning deposits increased $1060,000, or 2577.09%, to $50137,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010.

Interest expense ~~decreased~~increased $76330,000, or 513.92%, to $1.2.8 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, from $12.35 million for the same period in 2010. Interest expense on deposits increased by $11433,000, or 124.23%, to $~~926~~2.2 million for the six months ended June 30,~~000~~ 2011, from $~~915,000,~~1.8 million for the same period in 2010 due primarily to a ~~$64.6~~40 ~~million~~basis point decrease in the ~~weighted-~~average ~~balance~~cost ~~outstanding~~of deposits to 1.14% during the 2011 period, which was partially offset by 33a ~~basis~~$155.4 ~~point~~million, ~~decrease~~or 67.0%, increase in the ~~weighted~~average balances outstanding. The decrease in the average ~~costs~~cost of deposits is due to ~~1.26%~~the ~~during~~overall changes in the ~~2011~~deposit composition and lower market rates for the period. Interest expense on borrowings decreased by $87103,000, or 2314.83%, due primarily to a ~~$5.4~~69 ~~million,~~basis orpoint ~~14.6%,~~ decrease in the average ~~balance~~cost ~~outstanding~~of ~~and~~borrowings, awhich 42was ~~basis~~partially ~~point~~offset ~~decrease~~by an increase of $1.6 million, or 4.2% in the average ~~cost~~balance ~~of borrowings~~outstanding.

37As a result of the foregoing changes in interest income and interest expense, net interest income increased by $1.8 million, or 33.3%, to $7.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The average interest rate spread increased to 3.17% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 3.07% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The net interest margin decreased to 3.24% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 3.39% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Comparison of Operating Results for the ~~Three~~Six-Month Periods Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 (continued)

As a result of the foregoing changes in interest income and interest expense, net interest income increased by $16,000, or 0.6%, to $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The average interest rate spread decreased 20 basis points to 2.83% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from 3.03% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The net interest margin decreased to 3.00% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from 3.37% for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Provision for Losses on Loans

As a result of an analysis of historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Savings Bank, the status of past due principal and interest payments, general economic conditions, particularly as such conditions relate to the Savings Bank’s market area, and other factors related to the collectability of the Savings Bank’s loan portfolio, management recorded a $~~150~~200,000 provision for losses on loans for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to a $40100,000 provision for losses on loans for the ~~same~~six ~~period~~months inended June 30, 2010. ~~The~~Non-performing loans were 2.4% and 1.1% of total originated loans at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively. The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 reflects the amount necessary to maintain an adequate allowance based on ~~our~~the Corporation’s historical loss experience, ~~and~~as well as consideration of other external factors. These other external factors, economic conditions, and collateral value changes, have had a negative impact on non-owner-occupied loans in the portfolio. There can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be sufficient to cover losses on non-performing loans in the future; however, management believes they have identified all known and inherent losses that are probable and that can be reasonably estimated within the loan portfolio, and that the allowance is adequate to absorb such losses.

Other Income

Other income increased $78818,000, or 42221.97%, to $~~260,000~~1.2 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to the same ~~quarter~~period in 2010, due primarily to an increase in other operating income of $72449,000, ~~and~~ an increase in the gain on sale of loans of $10144,000, ~~which were partially offset by~~ an increase of $12144,000 in the ~~loss~~gain on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure and an increase of $55,000 in earnings on bank-owned life insurance. The increase in other operating income is a result of increased service fees on deposit accounts and an increase in service fees received from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a result of increased loan sales in the secondary market. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation sold 16 real estate owned properties resulting in proceeds of $1.9 million.

General, Administrative and Other Expense

General, administrative and other expense increased $~~202~~2.5 million,~~000,~~ or 961.67%, to $26.36 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, from $24.1 million for the comparable ~~quarter~~period in 2010. The increase is a result of $871,000 in employee compensation and benefits, an increase of $94306,000 in legal and professional ~~expenses~~expense, an increase of $56158,000 in ~~Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“~~FDIC”) expense and a $33573,000 increase in ~~property,~~other ~~payroll~~operating expense. The increase in employee compensation and ~~other~~benefits ~~taxes~~is a result of the additional employees and related costs resulting from the acquisition of First Franklin. The increase in legal and professional expenses is ~~primarily~~a ~~the~~ result of merger related costs ofand ~~approximately~~expenses ~~$127,000~~related ~~recognized~~to ~~during~~resolving ~~the~~real ~~2011~~estate ~~quarter~~owned properties. The increase in FDIC expense is a result of ~~the~~an ~~increased~~increase ~~rates~~in ~~imposed~~deposit byinsurance due to the ~~FDIC.~~First Franklin merger. The increase in ~~property, payroll and~~ other ~~taxes~~operating expense is a result of anmaintenance ~~increase~~expense, inreal ~~franchise~~estate tax expense and the fair market value adjustments on real estate owned property.

~~FDIC Premiums~~39

The FDIC imposes an assessment against institutions for deposit insurance. This assessment is based on the risk category of the institution and currently ranges from 5 to 43 basis points of the institution's deposits. Federal law requires that the designated reserve ratio for the deposit insurance fund be established by the FDIC at 1.15% to 1.50% of estimated insured deposits. If this reserve ratio drops below 1.15% or the FDIC expects that it to do so within six months, the FDIC must, within 90 days, establish and implement a plan to restore the designated reserve ratio to 1.15% of estimated insured deposits within five years (absent extraordinary circumstances).

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Comparison of Operating Results for the ~~Three~~Six-Month Periods Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 (continued)

~~These actions increased our~~ FDIC ~~insurance premiums in the first quarter of 2011 to $127,000 from $71,000 for the same period in 2010.~~Premiums

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") imposes an assessment against institutions for deposit insurance. This assessment is based on the risk category of the institution and currently ranges from 5 to 43 basis points of the institution's deposits. Federal law requires that the designated reserve ratio for the deposit insurance fund be established by the FDIC at 1.15% to 1.50% of estimated insured deposits. If this reserve ratio drops below 1.15% or the FDIC expects that it to do so within six months, the FDIC must, within 90 days, establish and implement a plan to restore the designated reserve ratio to 1.15% of estimated insured deposits within five years (absent extraordinary circumstances). In addition, the increase in our level of deposits following the First Franklin acquisition resulted in higher assessments.

These actions increased our FDIC insurance premiums for the first six months of 2011 to $305,000 from $147,000 for the same period in 2010.

Federal Income Taxes

The provision for federal income taxes decreased $~~267~~332,000, or ~~100~~53.04%, to $290,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011., from $622,000 for the same period in 2010. The effective tax rate was 16.6% and 36.5% for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 the Corporation was able to ~~utilize~~reverse approximately $~~488~~709,000 in ~~net~~valuation ~~operating~~allowance ~~loss carryforwards~~ previously reserved for as a result of the acquisition of First Franklin. The amount of deferred federal income taxes recorded in the First Franklin acquisition approximated the amount includable in regulatory capital. Cheviot Financial has approximately $86.34 million in remaining operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income for 20 years. These losses are subject to the annual allowable Internal Revenue Code Section 382 net operating loss limitations of $1.1 million ~~allowed on an annual basis~~. ~~The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 34.7%.~~

39Comparison of Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

General

Net earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $903,000, a $325,000 increase from the $578,000 earnings reported in the June 2010 period. The increase in net earnings reflects an increase in net interest income of $1.8 million, an increase of $740,000 in other operating income, a decrease of $65,000 in federal income taxes for the 2011 quarter end and a decrease in the provision for losses on loans of $10,000, which were partially offset by an increase of $2.3 million in general, administrative and other expenses. The results for the entire three month period ended June 30, 2011 include operations acquired in the First Franklin acquisition.

Net Interest Income

Total interest income increased $2.2 million, or 55.6%, to $6.2 million for the three-months ended June 30, 2011, from the comparable quarter in 2010. Interest income on loans increased $2.1 million, or 60.4%, to $5.5 million during the 2011 quarter from $3.4 million for the 2010 quarter. This increase was due primarily to a $169.7 million, or 69.9%, increase in the average balance of loans outstanding, which was partially offset by a 31 basis point decrease in the average yield on loans to 5.30% for the 2011 quarter from 5.61% for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (continued)

Net Interest Income (continued)

Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased $11,000, or 14.5%, to $87,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $76,000 for the comparable 2010 quarter, due primarily to a $3.1 million, or 31.2% increase in the average balance of securities outstanding, which was partially offset by a 39 basis point decrease in the average yield. Interest income on investment securities increased $101,000, or 21.3%, to $576,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $475,000 for the same quarter in 2010, due primarily to an increase of $32.6 million, or 49.5% in the average balance of investment securities outstanding, which was partially offset by a 54 basis point decrease in the average yield to 2.34% in the 2011 quarter. Interest income on other interest-earning deposits increased $49,000, or 132.4% to $86,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Interest expense increased $405,000, or 33.2% to $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $1.2 million for the same quarter in 2010. Interest expense on deposits increased by $422,000, or 48.6%, to $1.3 million, from $869,000, due primarily to a $245.2 million, or 104.7% increase in the average balance of deposits outstanding, which was partially offset by a 40 basis point decrease in the average costs of deposits to 1.08%. The decrease in the average cost of deposits is due to the overall changes in the deposit composition and lower market rates for the period. Interest expense on borrowings decreased by $17,000, or 4.8%, due primarily to an 85 basis point decrease in the average cost of borrowings, which was partially offset by a $8.4 million increase in the average balance outstanding.

As a result of the foregoing changes in interest income and interest expense, net interest income increased by $1.8 million, or 65.4%, to $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same quarter in 2010. The average interest rate spread increased to 3.39% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 3.10% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The net interest margin increased slightly to 3.42% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 3.40% for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Provision for Losses on Loans

Management recorded a $50,000 provision for losses on loans for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to a $60,000 provision for losses on loans for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The provision for loan losses during the three months ended June 30, 2011 reflects the amount necessary to maintain an adequate allowance based on the historical loss experience and other external factors. There can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be sufficient to cover losses on non-performing loans in the future, however management believes they have identified all known and inherent losses that are probable and that can be reasonably estimated within the loan portfolio, and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb such losses.

Other Income

Other income increased $740,000, or 395.7%, to $927,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same quarter in 2010, due primarily to an increase in the gain on the sale of loans of $134,000, an increase of $157,000 in the gain on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure and an increase in other operating income of $378,000. The increase in other operating income is a result of increased service fees on deposit accounts and an increase in service fees received from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a result of increased loan sales in the secondary market.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (continued)

General, Administrative and Other Expense

General, administrative and other expense increased $2.3 million, or 117.2%, to $4.3 million for of the three months ended June 30, 2011. This increase is a result of an increase in employee compensation and benefits of $897,000, an increase of $212,000 in legal and professional expenses, an increase of $102,000 in FDIC expense and an increase of $571,000 in other operating expenses. The increase in employee compensation and benefits is a result of the additional employees and related costs resulting from the acquisition of First Franklin. The increase in legal and professional expenses is a result of merger related costs and expenses related to resolving real estate owned properties. The increase in FDIC expense is a result of an increase in deposit insurance due to the First Franklin merger. The increase in other operating expense is a result of maintenance expense, real estate tax expense and the fair market value adjustments on real estate owned property.

Federal Income Taxes

The provision for federal income taxes decreased $65,000, or 18.3%, to $290,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $355,000 for the same quarter in 2010. The effective tax rate was 24.3% and 38.0% for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation was able to reverse approximately $221,000 in valuation allowance previously reserved for as a result of the acquisition of First Franklin. The amount of deferred federal income taxes recorded in the acquisition approximated the amount of deferred taxes recorded in regulatory capital. Cheviot Financial has approximately $6.4 million in remaining operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income for 20 years. These losses are subject to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 net operating loss limitations of $1.1 million allowed on an annual basis.

ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has been no material change in the Corporation’s market risk since the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 4T 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There were no changes in the Corporation’s internal controls ~~or in other factors~~ that could materially affect, or could reasonably be likely to materially affect, these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation by the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

4043

Cheviot Financial Corp.

PART II

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings

	None.

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors

	Not applicable.

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

	The Corporation announced a repurchase plan on January 16, 2008 which provides for the repurchase of 5% or 447,584 shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2011, the Corporation had purchased 86,766 shares pursuant to the program.

NONE

Period	Total # of shares purchased		Average price paid per share		Total # of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs
April 1-30, 2011		-	$	-		86,766
May 1-31, 2011		-	$	-		86,766
June 1-30, 2011		-	$	-		86,766

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities

	Not applicable.

ITEM 4.	Removed and reserved

ITEM 5.	Other information

	None.

ITEM 6.	Exhibits

	31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

~~Not applicable, as the Company is a smaller reporting company.~~44

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Corporation announced a repurchase plan on January 16, 2008 which provides for the repurchase of 5% or 447,584 shares of our common stock. As of March 31, 2011, the Corporation had purchased 86,766 shares at an average price of $9.09 pursuant to the program. There were no repurchases during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

				Total # of
				shares purchased
	Total	Average		as part of publicly
	# of shares	price paid		announced plans
Period	purchased	per share		or programs
January 1-31, 2011	-	$	-		86,766
February 1-28, 2011	-	$	-		86,766
March 1 – 31, 2011	-	$	-		86,766

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. Removed and reserved

ITEM 5. Other Information

None.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Cheviot Financial Corp.

PART II (continued)

ITEM 6.

Exhibits (continued)

101	The following financial statements from Cheviot Financial Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, filed on May 10, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

	101.INS	Interactive datafile	XBRL Instance Document
	101.SCH	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	101.CAL	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
	101.DEF	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	101.LAB	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
	101.PRE	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Cheviot Financial Corp.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:	~~May~~August 12, 2011	By:	/s/ Thomas J. Linneman
			Thomas J. Linneman
			President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	~~May~~August 12, 2011	By:	/s/ Scott T. Smith
			Scott T. Smith
			Chief Financial Officer

4246

Filing Compare · CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP