UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 Commission File No. 0-22750

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

(Name of registrant in its charter)

California		33-0224120
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1870 Cordell Court

El Cajon, CA 92020

(Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer'’s telephone number: 619-383-6600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, no par value per share

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best or registrant'’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or aan emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company.,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller Reporting Company ☒ Emerging growth company ☐

~~Non-accelerated~~If ~~filer~~an ~~☐ Smaller~~emerging ~~Reporting~~growth ~~Company~~company, ☒indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

At June 30, ~~2016~~2017, the end of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter; the aggregate market value of common equity held by non-affiliates was $57,~~395~~161,~~938~~166.

At ~~March~~February 2427, ~~2017~~2018, 21,~~836~~850,~~033~~185 shares of registrant'’s Common Stock were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
	Item 1	Description of Business	1
		Plan of Business	2
		Competition, Markets and Regulation	3
	Item 1A	Risk Factors
	Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments
	Item 2	Description of Property	4
		Northern California	4
		Developed and Undeveloped Leasehold Acreage	4
		Gross and Net Productive Wells	4
		Drilling Activities	5
		Production	5
		Net Proved Oil and Natural Gas Reserves	6
	Item 3	Legal Proceedings	6
	Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	6
PART II
	Item 5	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters	7
		Dividends	7
		Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities	7
	Item 6	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of financial Condition and Results of Operations	7
		Critical Accounting Policies	8
		Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015, as Compared to the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2014	10
		Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017, as Compared to the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016	10
		Capital Resources and Liquidity	1211
		Changes in Reserve Estimates	1312
	Item 7	Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk	13
	Item 8	Financial Statements	13
	Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	1413
	Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	1413
		Disclosure Controls	1413
		Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	1413
		Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting	1514
		Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls	1514
PART III
	Item 10	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	1615
	Item 11	Executive Compensation	1617
	Item 12	Security ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	1620
	Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	1621
	Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	1622
PART IV
	Item 15	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	1723
SIGNATURES			1824
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			F-1

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

PART I

Item 1 Description of Business

Royale Energy Funds, Inc. ("“Royale ~~Energy~~” or the “Company"”) is an independent oil and natural gas producer incorporated under the laws of California. Royale ~~Energy'~~’s principal lines of business are the production and sale of natural gas, acquisition of oil and gas lease interests and proved reserves, drilling of both exploratory and development wells, and sales of fractional working interests in wells to be drilled by Royale ~~Energy~~. Royale ~~Energy~~ was incorporated in California in 1986 and began operations in 1988. ~~Royale Energy's common stock is traded on the Over-The-Counter QB (OTCQB) Market System (symbol ROYL).~~ On December 31, ~~2016~~2017, Royale ~~Energy~~ had 11 full time employees.

Merger with Matrix Oil Management Corporation

InOn ~~July~~March ~~2016~~7, we2018, ~~entered~~Royale ~~into~~Energy aHoldings, ~~letter~~Inc. of(“New ~~intent~~Royale”), ~~with~~Royale, and Matrix Oil Management Corporation (“Matrix”) toand ~~merge~~its ~~Royale~~affiliates ~~Energy~~were ~~and~~notified ~~Matrix~~by inthe aCalifornia ~~combined~~Secretary ~~stock~~of State of the filing and ~~assumption~~acceptance of ~~debt~~agreements ~~transaction~~of merger by the California Secretary of State, to complete the previously announced merger between the companies (the “Merger”). OnIn ~~November~~the 30Merger, ~~2016~~Royale was merged into a newly formed subsidiary of New Royale, weand ~~entered~~Matrix was merged into ana second newly formed subsidiary of New Royale pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger ~~and~~among ~~Reorganization~~Royale, ~~dated~~New ~~November~~Royale, 30Royale Merger Sub, ~~2016~~Inc., ~~among~~ (“Royale Merger Sub”), ~~Royale~~Matrix ~~Energy~~Merger ~~Holdings~~Sub, Inc., a(“Matrix ~~Delaware~~Merger ~~corporation~~Sub”) and Matrix (the “~~Parent~~Merger Agreement”). Additionally, ~~Royale~~in ~~Merger~~connection ~~Sub,~~with ~~Inc.~~the merger, aall ~~California~~limited ~~corporation~~partnership ~~and~~interest ~~wholly-owned~~of ~~subsidiary~~two limited partnership affiliates of ~~Parent~~Matrix (Matrix Permian Investments, LP, and Matrix ~~Merger~~Las ~~Sub~~Cienegas Limited Partnership), ~~Inc~~were exchanged for New Royale common stock using conversion ratios according to the relative values of each partnership. All Class A limited partnership interests of another Matrix affiliate, aMatrix ~~California~~Investments, ~~corporation~~LP ~~and~~(“Matrix ~~wholly-owned~~Investments”) ~~subsidiary~~were exchanged for New Royale Common stock using conversion ratios according to the relative value of ~~Parent~~the Class A limited partnership interests, and $20,124,000 of Matrix Investments preferred limited partnership interests were converted into 2,012,400 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of New Royale. ~~The~~Another ~~Merger~~Matrix ~~Agreement~~affiliate, Matrix Oil Corporation (“Matrix Operator”), was ~~subsequently~~acquired ~~amended~~by ~~and~~New ~~restated~~Royale asby exchanging New Royale common stock for the outstanding common stock of ~~December~~Matrix 31Oil Corporation using a conversion ratio according to the relative value of the Matrix Oil Corporation common stock. Matrix, ~~2016~~Matrix (Oil Corporation and the three limited partnership affiliates of Matrix called the “~~Merger~~Matrix ~~Agreement”)~~Entities.”

The Merger ~~Agreement~~had isbeen ~~part~~previously ofapproved aby ~~series~~the respective holders of ~~related~~all ~~transactions~~outstanding incapital ~~which~~stock ~~the~~of ~~Parent~~Royale, ~~will~~Matrix, ~~(i)~~New ~~issue~~Royale, ~~its~~Matrix ~~common~~Merger ~~stock~~Sub toand ~~acquire~~Royale ~~all~~Merger ofSub ~~(A)~~on ~~the~~November ~~common~~16, ~~stock~~2017, ofas ~~Royale~~previously ~~Energy,~~reported ~~Matrix~~in ~~and~~our ~~Matrix’s~~Current ~~affiliate,~~Report ~~Matrix~~on ~~Oil~~Form ~~Corporation,~~8-K adated ~~California~~November ~~corporation~~16, ~~and~~2017. The ~~(B)~~Merger ~~the~~and ~~partnership~~related ~~interests~~transactions ofare ~~three~~described ~~limited~~in ~~partnerships~~detail ~~affiliated~~in ~~with~~our ~~Matrix~~Current ~~and~~Report ~~(ii)~~on ~~issue~~Form ~~newly~~8-K ~~created~~dated ~~Series~~March B7, ~~3.5%~~2018, ~~Convertible~~and ~~Preferred~~in ~~Stock~~New inRoyale’s ~~exchange~~Current ~~for~~Report ~~approximately~~on ~~$20,124,000~~Form of8-K ~~subordinated~~dated ~~debt~~March ~~issued~~7, by2018 ~~Matrix~~(SEC ~~and~~File ~~its~~No. ~~affiliates~~000-55912).

~~Immediately~~As ~~after~~a ~~the~~result ~~mergers~~of ~~and~~ the ~~related transactions~~Merger, itRoyale isbecame ~~expected~~a ~~that~~wholly ~~(i)~~owned ~~former~~subsidiary ~~holders~~ of ~~Matrix~~New ~~common stock~~Royale, ~~Matrix Oil Corporation capital stock~~ and ~~the~~each ~~three~~outstanding ~~limited~~share ~~partnerships affiliated with Matrix will collectively own 50% of the Parent’s~~ common stock ~~then outstanding, (ii) former holders~~ of Royale ~~Energy~~at ~~common~~the ~~stock~~time ~~will collectively own 50%~~ of the ~~Parent’s~~Merger ~~common~~was ~~stock~~converted ~~then~~into ~~outstanding,~~one inshare ~~each case giving effect to the number~~ of ~~shares of the Parent’s~~ common stock ~~issuable under all options and warrants outstanding immediately after the mergers other than shares issuable on exercise~~ of ~~certain~~New ~~options and warrants issued by~~ Royale. The ~~Energy~~common ~~and~~stock ~~(iii) former holders~~ of ~~subordinated~~New ~~debt~~Royale ~~issued~~is bytraded ~~Matrix~~on ~~and its affiliates will collectively own 100% of all of~~ the ~~Parent’s~~Over-The-Counter ~~Series~~QB B(OTCQB) ~~Convertible~~Market ~~Preferred~~System ~~Stock~~(symbol ~~then outstanding~~ROYL).

~~The~~In ~~merger~~this Annual Report, “Royale” and ~~related~~the ~~transactions~~“Company” ~~will~~refer ~~require~~to ~~the~~Royale ~~approval~~Energy ofFunds, Inc., the ~~shareholders~~California ofcorporation ~~each~~formerly ~~company~~known ~~and~~as ~~registration~~Royale ofEnergy, Inc. In connection with the Merger, the California Articles of Incorporation of Royale Energy, ~~equity~~Inc., ~~securities~~was amended to bechange ~~issued~~the inname of the ~~merger~~Company ~~under~~to Royale Energy Funds, Inc. This Annual Report describes the ~~Securities~~business ~~Act~~and affairs of ~~1933~~Royale, prior to ~~completion~~the ofMerger, for the ~~transaction~~year ended December 31, 2017.

~~Matrix~~Royale isEnergy ~~an independent oil and natural gas producer based in Santa Barbara~~Funds, ~~California~~Inc. ~~Matrix and its affiliates are privately held by fewer than ten equity holders and partners.~~

Royale ~~Energy~~owns wells and leases located mainly in the Sacramento Basin and San Joaquin Basin in California as well as in Utah, ~~Inc~~Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana. Royale usually sells a portion of the working interest in each well it drills or participates in to third party investors and retains a portion of the prospect for its own account. Selling part of the working interest to others allows Royale to reduce its drilling risk by owning a diversified inventory of properties with less of its own funds invested in each drilling prospect, than if Royale owned all the working interest and paid all drilling and development costs of each prospect itself. Royale generally sells working interests in its prospects to accredited investors in exempt securities offerings. The prospects are bundled into multi-well investments, which permit the third party investors to diversify their investments by investing in several wells at once instead of investing in single well prospects.

Royale Energy owns wells and leases located mainly in the Sacramento Basin and San Joaquin Basin in California as well as in Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana. Royale Energy usually sells a portion of the working interest in each well it drills or participates in to third party investors and retains a portion of the prospect for its own account. Selling part of the working interest to others allows Royale Energy to reduce its drilling risk by owning a diversified inventory of properties with less of its own funds invested in each drilling prospect, than if Royale Energy owned all the working interest and paid all drilling and development costs of each prospect itself. Royale Energy generally sells working interests in its prospects to accredited investors in exempt securities offerings. The prospects are bundled into multi-well investments, which permit the third party investors to diversify their investments by investing in several wells at once instead of investing in single well prospects.

During its fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, Royale Energy continued to explore and develop natural gas properties with a concentration in California. Additionally, we own proved developed producing and non-producing reserves of oil and natural gas in Utah, Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana, as well as holding an overriding royalty interest in a discovery in Alaska. In 2016, Royale Energy drilled three wells in northern California; which were all commercially productive. Royale Energy's estimated total reserves were approximately 2.1 and 2.5 BCFE (billion cubic feet equivalent) at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. According to the reserve reports furnished by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., Royale Energy's independent petroleum engineers, the undiscounted net reserve value of its proved developed and undeveloped reserves was approximately $3.0 million at December 31, 2016, based on the natural gas average PG&E city-gate spot price of $2.76 per MCF. Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. supplied reserve value estimates for the Company’s California, Texas, Oklahoma, Utah and Louisiana properties.

Table of Contents

During its fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, Royale continued to explore and develop natural gas properties with a concentration in California. Additionally, we own proved developed producing and non-producing reserves of oil and natural gas in Utah, Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana, as well as holding an overriding royalty interest in a discovery in Alaska. In 2017, Royale drilled three natural gas wells in northern California, two of which were commercially productive, and participated in the drilling of an additional oil well in the Sansinena field in Los Angeles County, which was commercially productive. Royale’s estimated total reserves were approximately 2.1 and 2.1 BCFE (billion cubic feet equivalent) at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. According to the reserve reports furnished by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., Royale’s independent petroleum engineers, the undiscounted net reserve value of its proved developed and undeveloped reserves was approximately $3.4 million at December 31, 2017, based on the natural gas average PG&E city-gate spot price of $3.26 per MCF. Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. supplied reserve value estimates for the Company’s California, Texas, Oklahoma, Utah and Louisiana properties.

Of course, net reserve value does not represent the fair market value of our reserves on that date, and we cannot be sure what return we will eventually receive on our reserves. Net reserve value of proved developed and undeveloped reserves was calculated by subtracting estimated future development costs, future production costs and other operating expenses from estimated net future cash flows from our developed and undeveloped reserves.

Our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at December 31, ~~2016~~2017, was estimated to be $1,~~483~~644,~~272~~688. This figure was calculated by subtracting our estimated future income tax expense from the net reserve value of proved developed and undeveloped reserves, and by further applying a 10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows. A detailed calculation of our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow is contained in Supplemental Information about Oil and Gas Producing Activities – Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flow from Proved Reserve Quantities, page F-24.

Royale ~~Energy~~ reported a gain on turnkey drilling in connection with the drilling of wells on a "“turnkey contract"” basis in the amount of $~~460~~1,~~210~~487,824 and $2460,~~330,969~~210 for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

In addition to Royale ~~Energy'~~’s own staff, Royale ~~Energy~~ hires independent contractors to drill, test, complete and equip the wells that it drills. Approximately 4455.40% of Royale ~~Energy'~~’s total revenue for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, came from sales of oil and natural gas from production of its wells in the amount of $~~538~~554,~~631~~235. In ~~2015~~2016, this amount was $1538,~~018~~631,~~928,~~ which represented 5944.54% of Royale ~~Energy'~~’s total revenues.

Plan of Business

Royale ~~Energy~~ acquires interests in oil and natural gas reserves and sponsors private joint ventures. Royale ~~Energy~~ believes that its stockholders are better served by diversification of its investments among individual drilling prospects. Through its sale of joint ventures, Royale ~~Energy~~ can acquire interests and develop oil and natural gas properties with greater diversification of risk and still receive an interest in the revenues and reserves produced from these properties. By selling some of its working interest in most projects, Royale ~~Energy~~ decreases the amount of its investment in the projects and diversifies its oil and gas property holdings, to reduce the risk of concentrating a large amount of its capital in a few projects that may not be successful.

After acquiring the leases or lease participation, Royale ~~Energy~~ drills or participates in the drilling of development and exploratory oil and natural gas wells on its property. Royale ~~Energy~~ pays its proportionate share of the actual cost of drilling, testing, and completing the project to the extent that it retains all or any portion of the working interest.

Royale ~~Energy~~ also may sell fractional working interests in undeveloped wells to finance part of the drilling cost. A drilling contract that calls for a company to drill a well, for a fixed price, to a specified depth or geological formation is called a "“turnkey contract."” When Royale ~~Energy~~ sells fractional working interests in unproved property to raise capital to drill oil and natural gas wells, generally it agrees to drill these wells on a turnkey contract basis, so that the holders of the fractional interests prepay a fixed amount for the drilling and completion of a specified number of wells. Under a turnkey contract, Royale ~~Energy~~ may record a gain if total funds received to drill a well were more than the actual cost to drill those wells including costs incurred on behalf of the participants and costs incurred for its own account.

Although Royale ~~Energy~~’s operating agreements do not usually address whether investors have a right to participate in subsequent wells in the same area of interest as a proposed well, it is the Company’s policy to offer to investors in a successful well the right to participate in subsequent wells at the same percentage level as their working interest investment in the prior successful well.

Our policy for turnkey drilling agreements is to recognize a gain on turnkey drilling programs after our obligations have been fulfilled, and a gain is only recorded when funds received from participants are in excess of all costs Royale incurs during the drilling programs (e.g., lease acquisition, exploration and development costs), including costs incurred on behalf of participants and costs incurred for its own account. See Note 1 to our Financial Statements, at page F-8.

Once drilling has commenced, it is generally completed within 10-30 days. See Note 1 to Royale Energy's Financial Statements, at page F-8. Royale Energy maintains internal records of the expenditure of each investor's funds for drilling projects.

Royale Energy generally operates the wells it completes. As operator, it receives fees set by industry standards from the owners of fractional interests in the wells and from expense reimbursements. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Royale Energy earned gross revenues from operation of the wells in the amount of $406,560 representing 33.5% of its total revenues for the year. In 2015, the amount was $503,441, which represented about 29.4% of total revenues. At December 31, 2016, Royale Energy operated 31 natural gas wells in California. Royale also has non-operating interests in three natural gas wells in Utah, four oil and gas wells in Texas, two in Oklahoma, four in California, and two in Louisiana.

Table of Contents

~~Royale~~Once ~~Energy~~drilling ~~currently~~has ~~sells~~commenced, ~~most~~it ofis ~~its~~generally ~~California~~completed ~~natural~~within ~~gas~~10-30 ~~production~~days. See ~~through~~Note ~~PG&E~~1 ~~pipelines~~ to ~~independent~~Royale’s ~~customers~~Financial ~~on a monthly contract basis~~Statements, ~~while~~at ~~some~~page ~~gas is delivered through privately owned pipelines to independent customers~~F-8. Royale ~~Since~~maintains ~~many~~internal ~~users~~records ~~are~~of ~~willing to make such purchase arrangements,~~ the ~~loss~~expenditure of ~~any~~each ~~one~~investor’s ~~customer~~funds ~~would~~for ~~not~~drilling ~~affect our overall sales operations~~projects.

~~All~~Royale ~~oil~~generally ~~and~~operates ~~natural~~the ~~gas~~wells ~~properties~~it ~~are~~completes. As ~~depleting~~operator, ~~assets~~it inreceives ~~which~~fees ~~production~~set ~~naturally~~by ~~decreases~~industry ~~over~~standards ~~time~~from as the ~~finite~~owners ~~amount~~ of ~~existing~~fractional ~~reserves~~interests ~~are~~in ~~produced~~the wells and ~~sold~~from expense reimbursements. ItFor isthe year ended December 31, 2017, Royale ~~Energy’s~~earned ~~business~~gross asrevenues anfrom ~~oil~~operation ~~and~~of ~~natural~~the ~~gas~~wells ~~exploration~~in ~~and~~the ~~production~~amount ~~company~~of to$197,020 ~~continually~~representing ~~search~~19.6% ~~for~~of ~~new~~its ~~development~~total ~~properties~~revenues for the year. ~~The~~In ~~Company’s~~2016, ~~success~~the ~~will~~amount ~~ultimately~~was ~~depend~~$406,560, onwhich ~~its~~represented ~~ability~~about to33.5% of ~~continue~~total ~~locating~~revenues. At ~~and~~December ~~developing~~31, ~~new~~2017, ~~oil~~Royale ~~and~~operated 24 natural gas ~~resources. Natural~~wells ~~gas~~in ~~demand~~California. ~~and~~Royale ~~the~~also ~~prices~~has ~~paid~~non-operating ~~for~~interests ~~gas~~in seven ~~are~~oil ~~seasonal.~~and Ingas ~~recent~~wells ~~years~~in California, three natural gas ~~demand~~wells in Utah, four oil and ~~prices~~gas wells in ~~Northern~~Texas, ~~California~~two ~~have~~in ~~fluctuated~~Oklahoma ~~unpredictably~~and ~~throughout~~one ~~the~~in ~~year~~Louisiana.

InRoyale ~~2016,~~currently ~~Royale~~sells ~~Energy~~most ~~formed~~of aits ~~wholly~~California ~~owned~~natural ~~subsidiary,~~gas ~~Royale~~production ~~DWI~~through ~~Investors,~~PG&E ~~LLC,~~pipelines ato ~~California~~independent ~~limited~~customers ~~liability~~on ~~company~~a monthly contract basis, towhile ~~hold~~some ~~legal~~gas ~~title~~is delivered through privately owned pipelines to ~~certain~~independent ~~oil~~customers. ~~and~~Since ~~gas~~many ~~working~~users ~~interests~~are ~~which~~willing ~~Royale~~to ~~Energy~~make ~~owns~~such ~~for~~purchase arrangements, the ~~benefit~~loss of ~~its~~any ~~working~~one ~~interest~~customer ~~investors. Royale~~would ~~Energy~~not ~~had~~affect noour ~~subsidiaries~~overall insales ~~2015~~operations.

All oil and natural gas properties are depleting assets in which production naturally decreases over time as the finite amount of existing reserves are produced and sold. It is Royale’s business as an oil and natural gas exploration and production company to continually search for new development properties. The Company’s success will ultimately depend on its ability to continue locating and developing new oil and natural gas resources. Natural gas demand and the prices paid for gas are seasonal. In recent years, natural gas demand and prices in Northern California have fluctuated unpredictably throughout the year.

In 2017, Royale had one wholly owned subsidiary, Royale DWI Investors, LLC, a California limited liability company, to hold legal title to certain oil and gas working interests which Royale owns for the benefit of its working interest investors.

Competition, Markets and Regulation

Competition

The exploration and production of oil and natural gas is an intensely competitive industry. The sale of interests in oil and gas projects, like those Royale ~~Energy~~ sells, is also very competitive. Royale ~~Energy~~ encounters competition from other oil and natural gas producers, as well as from other entities that invest in oil and gas for their own account or for others, and many of these companies are substantially larger than Royale ~~Energy~~.

Markets

Market factors affect the quantities of oil and natural gas production and the price Royale ~~Energy~~ can obtain for the production from its oil and natural gas properties. Such factors include: the extent of domestic production; the level of imports of foreign oil and natural gas; the general level of market demand on a regional, national and worldwide basis; domestic and foreign economic conditions that determine levels of industrial production; political events in foreign oil-producing regions; and variations in governmental regulations including environmental, energy conservation, and tax laws or the imposition of new regulatory requirements upon the oil and natural gas industry.

Regulation

Federal and state laws and regulations affect, to some degree, the production, transportation, and sale of oil and natural gas from Royale ~~Energy~~’s operations. States in which Royale ~~Energy~~ operates have statutory provisions regulating the production and sale of oil and natural gas, including provisions regarding deliverability. These statutes, along with the regulations interpreting the statutes, generally are intended to prevent waste of oil and natural gas, and to protect correlative rights to produce oil and natural gas by assigning allowable rates of production to each well or proration unit.

The exploration, development, production and processing of oil and natural gas are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations to protect the environment. Various federal and state agencies are considering, and some have adopted, other laws and regulations regarding environmental controls that could increase the cost of doing business. These laws and regulations may require: the acquisition of permits by operators before drilling commences; the prohibition of drilling activities on certain lands lying within wilderness areas or where pollution arises; and the imposition of substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from drilling operations, particularly operations in offshore waters or on submerged lands. The cost of oil and natural gas development and production also may increase because of the cost of compliance with such legislation and regulations, together with any penalties resulting from failing to comply with the legislation and regulations. Ultimately, Royale ~~Energy~~ may bear some of these costs.

Presently, Royale Energy does not anticipate that compliance with federal, state and local environmental regulations will have a material adverse effect on capital expenditures, earnings, or its competitive position in the oil and natural gas industry; however, changes in the laws, rules or regulations, or the interpretation thereof, could have a materially adverse effect on Royale Energy’s financial condition or results of operation.

Table of Contents

Presently, Royale ~~Energy~~does ~~files~~not ~~quarterly,~~anticipate ~~yearly~~that ~~and~~compliance ~~other~~with ~~reports~~federal, ~~with~~state ~~the~~and ~~Securities~~local ~~Exchange~~environmental ~~Commission. You~~regulations ~~may~~will ~~obtain~~have a ~~copy~~material ofadverse ~~any~~effect ~~materials~~on ~~filed~~capital ~~by Royale Energy with the SEC at 100 F Street~~expenditures, ~~N.W.~~earnings, ~~Washington,~~or ~~D.C.~~its ~~20549,~~competitive byposition ~~calling~~in ~~1-800-SEC-0300. The~~the ~~SEC~~oil ~~also~~and ~~maintains~~natural angas ~~Internet~~industry; ~~site that contains reports~~however, ~~proxy~~changes ~~and~~in ~~information~~the ~~statements~~laws, ~~and~~rules ~~other~~or ~~information~~regulations, ~~regarding~~or ~~issuers that file electronically with~~ the ~~SEC~~interpretation atthereof, ~~http://www.sec.gov. Royale~~could ~~Energy~~have ~~also~~a ~~provides~~materially ~~access~~adverse toeffect ~~its~~on ~~SEC~~Royale’s ~~reports~~financial ~~and~~condition ~~other~~or ~~public~~results ~~announcements~~of ~~on its website, http://www~~operation.~~royl.com.~~

Royale has filed quarterly, yearly and other reports with the Securities Exchange Commission, and New Royale will continue filing these reports as Royale’s successor in interest. You may obtain a copy of any materials filed by Royale with the SEC at 100 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling 1-800-SEC-0300. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Royale also provides access to its SEC reports and other public announcements on its website, http://www.royl.com.

Item 2 Description of Property

Since 1993, Royale ~~Energy~~ has concentrated on development of properties in the Sacramento Basin and the San Joaquin Basin of Northern and Central California. In ~~2016~~2017, Royale ~~Energy~~ drilled three developmental natural gas wells in northern California, ~~two~~and ~~exploratory~~participated ~~producing~~in ~~wells~~the ~~and~~drilling ~~one~~of a developmental ~~producing~~oil well in Los Angeles County, California.

Following industry standards, Royale ~~Energy~~ generally acquires oil and natural gas acreage without warranty of title except as to claims made by, though, or under the transferor. In these cases, Royale ~~Energy~~ attempts to conduct due diligence as to title before the acquisition, but it cannot assure that there will be no losses resulting from title defects or from defects in the assignment of leasehold rights. Title to property most often carries encumbrances, such as royalties, overriding royalties, carried and other similar interests, and contractual obligations, all of which are customary within the oil and natural gas industry.

Following is a discussion of Royale ~~Energy'~~’s significant oil and natural gas properties. Reserves at December 31, ~~2016~~2017, for each property discussed below, have been determined by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., registered professional petroleum engineers, in accordance with reports submitted to Royale ~~Energy~~ on February 2214, ~~2017~~2018.

Northern California

Royale ~~Energy~~ owns lease interests in nine gas fields with locations ranging from Glenn County in the north to Madera County in the south, in the Sacramento Basin in California. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, Royale operated 3124 wells in California with estimated total proven, developed, and undeveloped reserves at approximately 2.01 BCF, according to Royale’s independently prepared reserve report as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

Developed and Undeveloped Leasehold Acreage

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, Royale ~~Energy~~ owned leasehold interests in the following developed and undeveloped properties in both gross and net acreage.

Developed

Undeveloped

Gross Acres

Net Acres

Gross Acres

Net Acres

California

5,092.76

3,778.97

11,432.00

3,308.42

All Other States

32,~~083~~947.1289

1,~~634~~600.5878

7,~~721~~121.00

6,~~859~~609.00

Total

8,~~175~~040.8865

5,~~413~~379.5574

1918,~~153~~553.00

109,~~167~~917.42

Gross and Net Productive Wells

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, Royale ~~Energy~~ owned interests in the following oil and gas wells in both gross and net acreage:

	Gross Wells		Net Wells
Natural Gas		4136.00		1815.2436
Oil		5.00		.3626
Total		4641.00		1815.6062

Table of Contents

Drilling Activities

The following table sets forth Royale ~~Energy'~~’s drilling activities during the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2016~~2017. All wells are located in the Continental U.S., in California, Texas, Louisiana and Utah.

Year	Type of Well(a)			Gross Wells(b)				Net Wells(e)
		Total		Producing(c)		Dry(d)		Producing(c)		Dry(d)
2015	Exploratory		2		1		1		0.5172		0.5243
	Developmental		2		1		1		0.3933		0.4725
2016	Exploratory		2		2		-		0.3613		-
	Developmental		1		1		-		0.2097		-
2017	Exploratory		-		-		-		-		-
	Developmental		4		3		1		0.0028		0.0000

An exploratory well is one that is drilled in search of new oil and natural gas reservoirs, or to test the boundary limits of a previously discovered reservoir. A developmental well is one drilled on a previously known productive area of an oil and natural gas reservoir with the objective of completing that reservoir.

b) Gross wells represent the number of actual wells in which Royale ~~Energy~~ owns an interest. Royale ~~Energy'~~’s interest in these wells may range from 1% to 100%.

c)	A producing well is one that produces oil and/or natural gas that is being purchased on the market.

d)	A dry well is a well that is not deemed capable of producing hydrocarbons in paying quantities.

e) One "“net well"” is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross wells or acres equals one. The number of net wells is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross wells expressed as a whole number or a fraction.

Production

The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, Royale ~~Energy'~~’s net share of oil and natural gas production, average sales price per barrel (BBL), per thousand cubic feet (MCF) of natural gas, and the MCF equivalent (MCFE) for the barrels of oil based on a 6 to 1 ratio of the price per barrel of oil to the price per MCF of natural gas. "“Net"” production is production that Royale ~~Energy~~ owns either directly or indirectly through partnership or joint venture interests produced to its interest after deducting royalty, limited partner or other similar interests. Royale ~~Energy~~ generally sells its oil and natural gas at prices then prevailing on the "“spot market"” and does not have any material long term contracts for the sale of natural gas at a fixed price.

	2016		2015
	2017		2016
Net volume
Oil (BBL)		~~193~~102		~~403~~193
Gas (MCF)		~~232~~190,~~539~~111		~~363~~232,~~168~~539
MCFE		~~233~~190,~~697~~723		~~365~~233,~~586~~697
Average sales price
Oil (BBL)	$	1246.1107	$	4612.11
Gas (MCF)	$	2.3189	$	2.7531
Net production costs and taxes	$	~~594~~435,~~241~~637	$	1594,~~000,769~~241
Lifting costs (per MCFE)	$	2.5428	$	2.7454

Table of Contents

Net Proved Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, Royale ~~Energy~~ had proved developed reserves of 1,~~700~~799 MMCF and total proved reserves of 2,~~015~~132 MMCF of natural gas on all of the properties Royale ~~Energy~~ leases. For the same period, Royale ~~Energy~~ also had proved developed oil and natural gas liquid combined reserves of 60.2 MBBL and total proved oil and natural gas liquid combined reserves of 60.2 MBBL.

Oil and gas reserve estimates and the discounted present value estimates associated with the reserve estimates are based on numerous engineering, geological and operational assumptions that generally are derived from limited data.

Item 3 ~~Legal~~Defaults ~~Proceedings~~Upon Senior Securities

~~None~~On August 2, 2016, the Company issued two unsecured convertible promissory notes for a total principal amount of $1,580,000 to two investors. See Capital Resources and Liquidity, page 12. On August 2, 2017, the notes became due and payable and remained due and payable on December 31, 2017. On February 28, 2018, one of the notes, for $300,000, was converted to 750,000 shares of common stock immediately prior to the Merger (a conversion price of $0.40 per share). Also on February 28, 2018, Royale reached a settlement of a dispute with the second investor regarding his advance of $1.28 million. In the settlement, Royale has agreed to pay $1.9 million to the investor, who in turn did not receive shares of the Company’s common stock on conversion of this investment. In the settlement, Royale also cancelled a two year warrant issued to the second investor to purchase 1,066,667 of Royale common stock at $0.80 per share.

Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5 Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Royale ~~Energy~~’s Common Stock is traded under the symbol “ROYL”. Since January 21, 2016, Royale ~~Energy~~’s Common Stock has been traded on the OTC QB Market. Prior to that, Royale ~~energy~~’s Common Stock was traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market. As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, 21,~~836~~850,~~033~~185 shares of Royale ~~Energy~~’s Common Stock were held by approximately 64,~~008~~928 stockholders. The following table reflects the high and low quarterly closing sales prices on the Nasdaq Stock Market and OTC QB Market from January ~~2015~~2016 through December ~~2016~~2017.

	1st Qtr				2nd Qtr				3rd Qtr				4th Qtr
	High		Low		High		Low		High		Low		High		Low
2015		2.16		1.55		1.82		1.15		1.27		0.63		0.81		0.30
2016		0.57		0.07		0.47		0.34		0.80		0.43		0.74		0.58
2017		0.65		0.50		0.50		0.32		0.44		0.33		0.45		0.34

Dividends

The Board of Directors did not issue cash or stock dividends in ~~2016~~2017 or ~~2015~~2016.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Item 6 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Royale ~~Energy~~’s Financial Statements and Notes thereto and other financial information relating to Royale ~~Energy~~ included elsewhere in this document.

Since 1993, Royale ~~Energy~~ has primarily acquired and developed producing and non-producing natural gas properties in California. In 2004, Royale ~~Energy~~ began developing leases in Utah and in 2012 began acquiring leases in Alaska. The most significant factors affecting the results of operations are (i) the change in commodities price of natural gas and oil reserves owned by Royale ~~Energy~~, (ii) changes in oil and natural gas production levels and reserves, and (iii) turnkey drilling activities and (iv) the impairment of our Alaska leases.

Merger with Matrix Oil Management Corporation

~~Royale~~On ~~Energy~~March ~~has entered into an amended and restated merger agreement dated as of December 31~~7, ~~2016~~2018, ~~among~~New Royale ~~Energy~~, Royale ~~Energy Holdings~~, ~~Inc.,~~and ~~a Delaware corporation (the “Parent”), Royale Merger Sub, Inc.,~~ Matrix ~~Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent,~~ and ~~Matrix~~its ~~Oil~~affiliates ~~Management~~were ~~Corporation~~notified ~~(“Matrix”). The~~by ~~Merger~~the ~~Agreement~~California isSecretary ~~part~~ of aState ~~series~~ of ~~related transactions in which~~ the ~~Parent~~filing ~~will~~and ~~(i)~~acceptance ~~issue~~of ~~its~~agreements ~~common stock to acquire all~~ of ~~(A)~~merger by the ~~common~~California ~~stock~~Secretary of ~~Royale Energy~~State, ~~Matrix~~to ~~and~~complete ~~Matrix’s~~the ~~affiliate,~~previously ~~Matrix~~announced ~~Oil~~merger ~~Corporation,~~between ~~and (B)~~ the ~~partnership~~companies ~~interests of three limited partnerships affiliated with Matrix and~~ (iithe “Merger”), ~~issue~~as ~~newly~~described ~~created Series B 3.5% Convertible Preferred Stock~~ in ~~exchange~~Item ~~for~~1 ~~approximately~~– ~~$20,124,000~~Description of ~~subordinated~~Business ~~debt~~– ~~issued~~Merger bywith Matrix ~~and~~Oil ~~its~~Management ~~affiliates~~Corporation.

Immediately after the mergers and the related transactions, it is expected that (i) former holders of Matrix common stock, Matrix Oil Corporation capital stock and the three limited partnerships affiliated with Matrix will collectively own 50% of the Parent’s common stock then outstanding, (ii) former holders of Royale Energy common stock will collectively own 50% of the Parent’s common stock then outstanding, in each case giving effect to the number of shares of the Parent’s common stock issuable under all options and warrants outstanding immediately after the mergers other than shares issuable on exercise of certain options and warrants issued by Royale Energy and (iii) former holders of subordinated debt issued by Matrix and its affiliates will collectively own 100% of all of the Parent’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock then outstanding.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Royale’s primary business is oil and gas production. Natural gas flows from the wells into gathering line systems, which are equipped occasionally with compressor systems, which in turn flow into metered transportation and customer pipelines. Monthly, price data and daily production are used to invoice customers for amounts due to Royale ~~Energy~~ and other working interest owners. Royale ~~Energy~~ operates most of its own wells and receives industry standard operator fees.

Royale ~~Energy~~ generally sells crude oil and natural gas under short-term agreements at prevailing market prices. Revenues are recognized when the products are delivered, which occurs when the customer has taken title and has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, prices are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenues from the production of oil and natural gas properties in which the Royale ~~Energy~~ has an interest with other producers are recognized on the basis of Royale ~~Energy~~’s net working interest. Differences between actual production and net working interest volumes are not significant.

Royale ~~Energy~~’s financial statements include its pro rata ownership of wells. Royale ~~Energy~~ usually sells a portion of the working interest in each well it drills or participates in to third party investors and retains a portion of the prospect for its own account. Royale ~~Energy~~ generally retains about a 50% working interest. All results, successful or not, are included at its pro rata ownership amounts: revenue, expenses, assets, and liabilities as defined in FASB ASC 932-323-25 and 932-360.

Table of Contents

Oil and Gas Property and Equipment

Depreciation, depletion and amortization, based on cost less estimated salvage value of the asset, are primarily determined under either the unit-of-production method or the straight-line method, which is based on estimated asset service life taking obsolescence into consideration. Maintenance and repairs, including planned major maintenance, are expensed as incurred. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized and the assets replaced are retired.

The project construction phase commences with the development of the detailed engineering design and ends when the constructed assets are ready for their intended use. Interest costs, to the extent they are incurred to finance expenditures during the construction phase, are included in property, plant and equipment and are depreciated over the service life of the related assets.

Royale ~~Energy~~ uses the “successful efforts” method to account for its exploration and production activities. Under this method, Royale ~~Energy~~ accumulates its proportionate share of costs on a well-by-well basis with certain exploratory expenditures and exploratory dry holes being expensed as incurred, and capitalizes expenditures for productive wells. Royale ~~Energy~~ amortizes the costs of productive wells under the unit-of-production method.

Royale ~~Energy~~ carries, as an asset, exploratory well costs when the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and where Royale ~~Energy~~ is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Exploratory well costs not meeting these criteria are charged to expense. Other exploratory expenditures, including geophysical costs and annual lease rentals, are expensed as incurred.

Acquisition costs of proved properties are amortized using a unit-of-production method, computed on the basis of total proved oil and gas reserves.

Capitalized exploratory drilling and development costs associated with productive depletable extractive properties are amortized using unit-of-production rates based on the amount of proved developed reserves of oil and gas that are estimated to be recoverable from existing facilities using current operating methods. Under the unit-of-production method, oil and gas volumes are considered produced once they have been measured through meters at custody transfer or sales transaction points at the outlet valve on the lease or field storage tank.

Production costs are expensed as incurred. Production involves lifting the oil and gas to the surface and gathering, treating, field processing and field storage of the oil and gas. The production function normally terminates at the outlet valve on the lease or field production storage tank. Production costs are those incurred to operate and maintain Royale ~~Energy~~’s wells and related equipment and facilities. They become part of the cost of oil and gas produced. These costs, sometimes referred to as lifting costs, include such items as labor costs to operate the wells and related equipment; repair and maintenance costs on the wells and equipment; materials, supplies and energy costs required to operate the wells and related equipment; and administrative expenses related to the production activity. Proved oil and gas properties held and used by Royale are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

Royale estimates the future undiscounted cash flows of the affected properties to judge the recoverability of carrying amounts. Cash flows used in impairment evaluations are developed using annually updated evaluation assumptions for crude oil commodity prices. Annual volumes are based on field production profiles, which are also updated annually. Prices for natural gas and other products are based on assumptions developed annually for evaluation purposes.

Impairment analyses are generally based on proved reserves. An asset group would be impaired if the undiscounted cash flows were less than its carrying value. Impairments are measured by the amount the carrying value exceeds fair value. During 2017 and 2016, impairment losses of $289,775 and $2,071,849, respectively, were recorded on various capitalized lease and land costs where the carrying value exceeded the fair value or where the leases were no longer viable.

Significant unproved properties are assessed for impairment individually, and valuation allowances against the capitalized costs are recorded based on the estimated economic chance of success and the length of time that Royale expects to hold the properties. The valuation allowances are reviewed at least annually.

Upon the sale or retirement of a complete field of a proved property, Royale eliminates the cost from its books, and the resultant gain or loss is recorded to Royale’s Statement of Operations. Upon the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property where the property has been assessed for impairment individually, a gain or loss is recognized in Royale’s Statement of Operations. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, any funds received are accounted for as a recovery of the cost in the interest retained with any excess funds recognized as a gain. Should Royale’s turnkey drilling agreements include unproved property, total drilling costs incurred to satisfy its obligations are recovered by the total funds received under the agreements. Any excess funds are recorded as a Gain on Turnkey Drilling Programs, and any costs not recovered are capitalized and accounted for under the “successful efforts” method.

Table of Contents

~~Proved~~Royale sponsors ~~oil~~turnkey ~~and~~drilling ~~gas~~agreement arrangements in unproved properties ~~held~~as a pooling of assets in a joint undertaking, whereby proceeds from participants are reported as Deferred Drilling Obligations, and ~~used~~then byreduced ~~Royale~~as ~~Energy~~costs to complete its obligations are ~~reviewed~~incurred ~~for~~with ~~impairment~~any ~~whenever~~excess ~~events~~booked oragainst ~~changes~~its property account to reduce any basis in ~~circumstances~~its ~~indicate~~own ~~that~~interest. Gains on Turnkey Drilling Programs represent funds received from turnkey drilling participants in excess of all costs Royale incurs during the ~~carrying~~drilling ~~amounts~~programs ~~may~~(e.g., ~~not~~lease beacquisition, ~~recoverable~~exploration and development costs), including costs incurred on behalf of participants and costs incurred for its own account; and are recognized only upon making this determination after Royale’s obligations have been fulfilled.

~~Royale~~The ~~Energy~~contracts ~~estimates~~require the ~~future~~participants ~~undiscounted~~pay ~~cash~~Royale ~~flows of~~ the ~~affected~~full ~~properties~~contract toprice ~~judge~~upon ~~the~~execution ~~recoverability~~ of ~~carrying~~the ~~amounts~~agreement. Royale ~~Cash~~completes ~~flows~~the ~~used~~drilling inactivities ~~impairment~~typically ~~evaluations~~between ~~are~~10 ~~developed~~and ~~using~~30 ~~annually~~days ~~updated~~after ~~evaluation~~drilling ~~assumptions~~begins. The ~~for~~participant ~~crude~~retains ~~oil~~an ~~commodity~~undivided ~~prices. Annual~~or ~~volumes~~proportional ~~are~~beneficial ~~based~~interest onin ~~field~~the ~~production profiles~~property, ~~which~~and ~~are~~is also ~~updated~~responsible ~~annually~~for its proportionate share of operating costs. Royale ~~Prices~~retains ~~for~~legal ~~natural~~title ~~gas~~to ~~and~~the ~~other~~lease. The ~~products~~participants ~~are~~purchase ~~based~~a onworking ~~assumptions~~interest ~~developed~~directly ~~annually~~in ~~for~~the ~~evaluation~~well ~~purposes~~bore.

Impairment analyses are generally based on proved reserves. An asset group would be impaired if the undiscounted cash flows were less than its carrying value. Impairments are measured by the amount the carrying value exceeds fair value. During 2016 and 2015, impairment losses of $2,071,849 and $424,163, respectively, were recorded on various capitalized lease and land costs where the carrying value exceeded the fair value or where the leases were no longer viable.

Significant unproved properties are assessed for impairment individually, and valuation allowances against the capitalized costs are recorded based on the estimated economic chance of success and the length of time that Royale Energy expects to hold the properties. The valuation allowances are reviewed at least annually.

Upon the sale or retirement of a complete field of a proved property, Royale Energy eliminates the cost from its books, and the resultant gain or loss is recorded to Royale Energy’s Statement of Operations. Upon the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property where the property has been assessed for impairment individually, a gain or loss is recognized in Royale Energy’s Statement of Operations. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, any funds received are accounted for as a recovery of the cost in the interest retained with any excess funds recognized as a gain. Should Royale Energy’s turnkey drilling agreements include unproved property, total drilling costs incurred to satisfy its obligations are recovered by the total funds received under the agreements. Any excess funds are recorded as a Gain on Turnkey Drilling Programs, and any costs not recovered are capitalized and accounted for under the “successful efforts” method.

Royale Energy sponsors turnkey drilling agreement arrangements in unproved properties as a pooling of assets in a joint undertaking, whereby proceeds from participants are reported as Deferred Drilling Obligations, and then reduced as costs to complete its obligations are incurred with any excess booked against its property account to reduce any basis in its own interest. Gains on Turnkey Drilling Programs represent funds received from turnkey drilling participants in excess of all costs Royale incurs during the drilling programs (e.g., lease acquisition, exploration and development costs), including costs incurred on behalf of participants and costs incurred for its own account; and are recognized only upon making this determination after Royale’s obligations have been fulfilled.

The contracts require the participants pay Royale Energy the full contract price upon execution of the agreement. Royale Energy completes the drilling activities typically between 10 and 30 days after drilling begins. The participant retains an undivided or proportional beneficial interest in the property, and is also responsible for its proportionate share of operating costs. Royale Energy retains legal title to the lease. The participants purchase a working interest directly in the well bore.

In these working interest arrangements, the participants are responsible for sharing in the risk of development, but also sharing in a proportional interest in rights to revenues and proportional liability for the cost of operations after drilling is completed.

Since the participant’s interest in the prospect is limited to the well, and not the lease, the investor does not have a legal right to participate in additional wells drilled within the same lease. However, it is the Company’s policy to offer to participants in a successful well the right to participate in subsequent wells at the same percentage level as their working interest investment in the prior successful well with similar turnkey drilling agreement terms.

A certain portion of the turnkey drilling participant’s funds received are non-refundable. The company records a liability for all funds invested as deferred drilling obligations until each individual well is complete. Occasionally, drilling is delayed for various reasons such as weather, permitting, drilling rig availability and/or contractual obligations. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, Royale ~~Energy~~ had deferred drilling obligations of $75,~~894~~891,~~001~~898 and $87,~~415~~894,~~528~~001 respectively.

If Royale ~~Energy~~ is unable to drill the wells, and a suitable replacement well is not found, Royale would retain the non-refundable portion of the contract and return the remaining funds to the participant. Included in cash and cash equivalents are amounts for use in completion of turnkey drilling programs in progress.

Losses on properties sold are recognized when incurred or when the properties are held for sale and the fair value of the properties is less than the carrying value.

Table of Contents

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates pertain to proved oil, plant products and gas reserve volumes and the future development costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects, calculated at currently enacted rates, of (a) future deductible/taxable amounts attributable to events that have been recognized on a cumulative basis in the financial statements or income tax returns, and (b) operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. All available evidence, both positive and negative, must be considered to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is needed. The Company uses information about the Company’s financial position and its results of operations for the current and preceding years.

The Company must use its judgment in considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence. The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. The more negative evidence that exists, the more positive evidence is necessary and the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed for some portion or all of the deferred tax asset. A cumulative loss in recent years is a significant piece of negative evidence that is difficult to overcome.

Future realization of a tax benefit sometimes will be expected for a portion, but not all, of a deferred tax asset, and the dividing line between the two portions may be unclear. In those circumstances, application of judgment based on a careful assessment of all available evidence is required to determine the portion of a deferred tax asset for which it is more likely than not a tax benefit will not be realized.

Table of Contents

Going Concern

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $4548,~~778~~205,~~521~~690, a working capital deficiency of $57,~~905~~752,~~165~~695 and a stockholders’ deficit of $46,~~513~~940,~~072~~241. As a result, our financial statements include a “going concern qualification” reflecting substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. See Note 1 to our audited financial statements. We ~~are~~have ~~seeking~~merged ~~to merge~~ with Matrix to increase efficiency and reduce costs to both companies, thereby allowing a return to positive cash flow. We ~~have~~are noexploring commitments to provide ~~any~~ additional financing, ~~and~~but there is no guarantee that we will be able to secure additional financing on acceptable terms, or at all, if needed to fully fund our ~~2017~~2018 drilling budget and to support future operations.

Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, as Compared to the Twelve Months Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016

For the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we recorded a net loss of $42,~~144~~427,~~462~~169, compared to net loss of $24,~~010~~144,~~816~~462 during ~~2015~~2016. Total revenues from operations in ~~2016~~2017 were $1,~~213~~007,~~839~~379, a decrease of $~~499~~206,~~249~~460, or 2917.10% from the total revenues of $1,~~713~~213,~~088~~839 in ~~2015~~2016, due to lower ~~natural~~lease ~~gas~~operating ~~production~~overhead ~~and~~receipts ~~commodity~~due ~~prices~~mainly ~~during~~to the sale of our Victor Ranch field interests in 2016. Total expenses for operations in ~~2016~~2017 were $64,~~505~~836,~~716~~429, a decrease of $~~432~~1,~~025~~669,287, or 625.27%, from the total expenses of $6,~~937~~505,~~741~~716 in ~~2015~~2016, mainly due to ~~cost~~the ~~reduction~~impairment ~~measures~~loss in ~~most~~2016 due to termination of our ~~operating~~remaining ~~expense~~Alaska ~~categories~~leases.

In ~~2016~~2017, revenues from oil and gas production ~~decreased~~increased by 472.19% to $~~538~~554,~~631~~235 from $1538,~~018,928~~631 in ~~2015~~2016. This ~~decrease~~increase was due to ~~lower~~higher ~~production volumes and lower~~ natural gas commodity prices received ~~during~~in ~~2016~~2017. The net sales volume of natural gas for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, was approximately ~~232~~190,~~539~~111 MCF with an average price of $2.3189 per MCF, versus ~~363~~232,~~168~~539 MCF with an average price of $2.7531 per MCF for ~~2015~~2016. This represents a decrease in net sales volume of ~~130~~42,~~629~~428 MCF or 3618.2%. This decrease in production volume was mainly due to the natural declines in our wells, and the sale of our Victor Ranch field interests which had an effective date of September 1, 2016. Additionally in 2017, our operated wells were temporarily offline in November and December 2017 due to new pipeline equipment requirements by Pacific Gas & Electric. The net sales volume for oil and condensate (natural gas liquids) production was approximately ~~193~~102 barrels with an average price of $1246.1107 per barrel, ~~which was lower due to the inclusion of oil byproducts in the barrel count,~~ for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, compared to ~~403~~193 barrels at an average price of $4612.11 per barrel, which was lower due to the inclusion of oil byproducts in the barrel count, for the year in ~~2015~~2016. This represents a decrease in net sales volume of ~~210~~91 barrels, or 5247.12%, also due to the natural declines on existing oil and condensate wells. Northern and central California accounted for approximately 9791% of the Company’s successful natural gas production in ~~2016~~2017.

Oil and natural gas lease operating expenses decreased by $158,604, or 26.7% to $435,637 for the year ended December 31, 2017, from $594,241 for the year in 2016. This decrease was due to the sale of our Victor Ranch field interests in 2016 which reduced overhead, pumping and compression costs during 2017. When measuring lease operating costs on a production or lifting cost basis, in 2017, the $435,637 equates to a $2.28 per MCFE lifting cost versus a $2.54 per MCFE lifting cost in 2016, a 10.2% decrease, due to lower production volumes in 2017.

At December 31, 2017, Royale had a deferred drilling obligation of $5,891,898. During 2017, we disposed of $5,934,604 of obligations relating to 2016, upon completing the drilling of three developmental natural gas wells and participating in the drilling of an additional developmental oil well, while incurring expenses of $4,446,780. This resulted in a gain of $1,487,824. During 2016, we disposed of $4,502,026 of obligations relating to 2015, upon completing the drilling of three wells, two exploratory and one developmental, while incurring expenses of $4,041,816, resulting in a gain of $460,210. Royale expects to dispose of approximately $2.3 million of its deferred drilling obligation in the first six months of 2018 with $2.1 million of its deferred drilling obligation disposed of by the end of 2018.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded gains of $73,325 and $341,751, respectively, on the settlement of accounts payable. During the years in 2017 and 2016, we also recorded write downs of $16,375 and $19,151, respectively, on certain oil and gas well equipment that were either no longer useable or written down to their current market value. During 2016, we recorded a gain of $284,419 on the sale of interests in our Victor Ranch field wells and leases. During 2016, we also recorded a gain of $198,975 on the sale of our Company owned office building located in El Cajon, California. In 2016, we recorded a loss on disposal of assets of $23,781, on fixed assets that were no longer viable.

Impairment losses of $289,775 and $2,071,849 were recorded in 2017 and 2016, respectively. We periodically review our proved properties for impairment on a field-by-field basis and charge impairments of value to the expense. In 2017, the impairments were on various capitalized leases that were no longer viable. In 2016, $2,025,546 of the impairment loss was due to termination of our remaining Alaska leases which were not renewed due to nonpayment of the delay rental payments. Also in 2016, $46,303 of the impairment loss was due to capitalized lease and land costs on a Texas lease that was no longer viable.

Table of Contents

~~Oil~~Bad ~~and~~debt ~~natural~~expense ~~gas~~for ~~lease~~2017 ~~operating~~and ~~expenses~~2016 ~~decreased~~were by $~~406~~164,~~528,~~145 orand ~~40.6% to~~ $~~594~~0,~~241~~ ~~for~~respectively. The ~~the~~expenses ~~year~~in ~~ended~~2017 ~~December~~arose ~~31, 2016,~~ from ~~$1,000,769~~identified ~~for~~uncollectable ~~the~~receivables ~~year~~relating into ~~2015. This~~our ~~decrease~~oil ~~was~~and ~~due~~natural togas ~~lower~~properties ~~production~~either ~~volumes~~plugged and toabandoned ~~cost~~or ~~reduction~~scheduled ~~measures~~for ~~especially~~plugging inand ~~lower~~abandonment ~~workover costs~~ and ~~operating~~our ~~costs~~year-end ~~for~~oil ~~non-operated~~and ~~wells~~natural ~~during~~gas ~~2016~~reserve values. ~~When~~We ~~measuring~~periodically ~~lease~~review ~~operating~~our ~~costs~~accounts onreceivable afrom ~~production~~working orinterest ~~lifting~~owners ~~cost~~to ~~basis,~~determine inwhether ~~2016,~~collection ~~the~~of ~~$594,241~~any ~~equates~~of tothese acharges $2appears doubtful.54 By ~~per~~contract, ~~MCFE~~the ~~lifting~~Company ~~cost~~may ~~versus~~not acollect ~~$2.74~~some ~~per~~charges ~~MCFE~~from ~~lifting~~its ~~cost~~Direct inWorking ~~2015,~~Interest aowners ~~7.3%~~for ~~decrease,~~certain ~~due~~wells tothat ~~lower~~ceased production ~~volumes~~or inhad ~~2016. For~~been ~~the~~sold ~~year~~during ~~ended~~the ~~December 31~~year, ~~2016,~~to ~~delay~~the ~~rental~~extent ~~costs~~that ~~decreased~~these bycharges ~~$448,313,~~exceed asproduction ~~there were no delay rental costs paid in 2016~~revenue.

AtThe ~~December~~aggregate ~~31,~~of ~~2016,~~supervisory ~~Royale~~fees ~~Energy~~and ~~had~~other aincome ~~deferred~~was ~~drilling obligation of~~ $7453,~~894,001. During~~144 ~~2016,~~for wethe ~~disposed~~year ofended $4December 31,~~502,026~~ ~~of obligations relating to 2015~~2017, ~~upon~~a ~~completing the~~decrease ~~drilling~~ of ~~three wells~~$222,064 ~~two~~or ~~exploratory and one developmental~~32. ~~This~~9% ~~resulted~~from ~~in a gain of~~ $~~460~~675,~~210. During~~208 ~~2015,~~during wethe ~~disposed~~year ofin ~~$4,955,734~~2016. This ofdecrease ~~obligations~~was ~~relating~~due to ~~2014,~~lower ~~upon~~operations ~~completing the~~and drilling ofoverhead ~~four~~and ~~wells,~~pipeline ~~two~~fees ~~exploratory~~due ~~and~~to ~~two~~lower ~~developmental. Additionally~~production wevolumes ~~purchased~~during anthe ~~interest~~period in an2017 ~~existing~~mainly ~~well~~due ~~from~~to anthe ~~industry~~sale ~~partner. In~~of ~~2015,~~our weVictor ~~also~~Ranch ~~recorded~~field ainterests ~~gain~~in of2016. Supervisory ~~$564,346~~fees onare ~~accounts~~charged ~~payable invoices~~ in ~~dispute~~accordance aswith the ~~vendor~~Council ~~went~~for ~~into~~Petroleum ~~bankruptcy,~~Accountants ~~and~~Societies ~~under~~(COPAS) ~~the~~policy ~~opinion~~for reimbursement of ~~legal~~expenses ~~counsel,~~associated ~~these~~with ~~invoices~~the ~~were~~joint ~~deemed~~accounting nofor ~~longer~~billing, ~~payable. This~~revenue ~~resulted~~disbursement, inand apayment ~~gain~~ of ~~$2,330,969. The~~taxes ~~three~~and ~~wells~~royalties. These ~~drilled~~charges inare ~~2016~~reevaluated ~~were~~each ~~higher~~year inand ~~costs~~adjusted ~~than~~up ~~those~~or ~~drilled~~down inas ~~2015,~~deemed ~~due~~appropriate toby ~~their~~a ~~locations,~~published ~~depths~~report ~~completion~~to ~~costs~~the ~~and~~industry ~~additional~~by ~~directional~~Ernst ~~costs~~& ~~associated~~Young, ~~with~~LLP, ~~one~~Certified ofPublic ~~the wells~~Accountants. ~~Royale~~ Supervisory ~~Energy~~fees ~~expects~~decreased to$209,540 ~~dispose~~or ~~of approximately $3~~51.5%, ~~million~~to of$197,020 ~~its deferred drilling obligation~~ in ~~the first six months of~~ 2017 ~~with~~from $~~6.4~~406,560 ~~million~~in ~~of its deferred drilling obligation disposed of by the end of 2017~~2016.

~~During 2016~~Depreciation, wedepletion ~~recorded a gain of $284,419 on the sale of interests in our Victor Ranch field wells~~ and ~~leases. During~~amortization ~~2016,~~expense wedecreased ~~also~~to ~~recorded a gain of~~ $~~198~~116,~~975~~017 onfrom ~~the sale of our Company owned office building located in El Cajon~~$283,874 ~~California. During the year in 2016, we recorded~~ a ~~gain~~decrease of $~~341~~167,~~751~~857 onor ~~the settlement of accounts payable~~59. In1% ~~2016,~~for wethe ~~recorded~~year aended ~~loss~~December ~~on disposal of assets of $23~~31,~~781,~~ ~~on fixed assets that were no longer viable. During 2016~~2017, weas ~~also~~compared ~~recorded a write down of $19,151 on certain oil and gas well equipment~~ to ~~its current estimated market value~~2016. ~~During~~ The ~~2015,~~depletion werate ~~recorded~~is acalculated ~~gain~~using ofproduction ~~$468,759~~as ~~related to the sale of~~ a ~~portion~~percentage of ~~our western block oil and gas lease acreage in Alaska~~reserves. ~~During~~This ~~this~~decrease ~~period,~~in wedepreciation ~~also~~expense ~~recorded~~was ~~a gain of $87,127 on the settlement of accounts payable~~ due to ~~vendors. In~~a ~~2015,~~lower wedepletion ~~also~~rate ~~recorded~~as areserve ~~gain~~volumes ofwere ~~$403,000~~higher onat the ~~sale~~end of a2017 ~~license~~and ~~agreement to our Alaska seismic survey. Additionally in 2015, we recorded~~ a ~~gain~~lower ofasset ~~$10,070~~base ondue to the sale of aour ~~Company~~Victor ~~owned~~Ranch ~~condominium~~field ~~located~~interests ~~in San Diego, California. During 2015, we recorded a write down of $60,960 on certain oil~~ and ~~gas~~our ~~well~~office ~~equipment~~building toin ~~its current estimated market value~~2016.

~~Impairment~~General ~~losses of $2,071,849~~ and ~~$424,163~~administrative ~~were~~expenses ~~recorded~~decreased inby ~~2016 and 2015~~$608,872 ~~respectively. In~~or ~~2016~~23.3%, to $2,~~025~~005,~~546~~630 offor the ~~impairment~~year ~~loss~~ended ~~was~~December ~~due~~31, to2017, ~~termination~~from of$2,614,502 ~~our~~for ~~remaining~~the ~~Alaska~~year ~~leases~~in ~~which~~2016. This ~~were~~decrease ~~not~~was ~~renewed~~primarily due to ~~nonpayment~~reductions ofin ~~the~~outside ~~delay~~consulting ~~rental~~services ~~payments~~in 2017. ~~Also~~Legal inand ~~2016,~~accounting expense increased to $461,~~303~~540,190 offor the ~~impairment~~year, ~~loss~~compared ~~was due~~ to ~~capitalized~~$627,577 ~~lease~~for ~~and~~2016, ~~land costs on~~ a ~~Texas~~$912,613 ~~lease~~or ~~that~~145.4% ~~was no longer viable~~increase. In The ~~2015,~~increase ~~$327,727~~in of2017 ~~the impairment loss~~ was mainly due to ~~two~~legal ~~Utah wells, one Louisiana well,~~ and ~~our~~accounting ~~Alaska~~expenses ~~acreage~~related ~~where~~to the ~~carrying~~Matrix ~~value~~merger ~~exceeded~~and the ~~fair~~legal ~~value. For~~settlement ~~the~~discussed ~~balance~~previously ~~of the loss~~ in ~~2015,~~Item ~~we recorded impairments on various capitalized lease and land costs that were no longer viable~~3.

~~Bad~~Marketing ~~debt~~ expense for ~~2016~~the ~~and~~year ~~2015~~ended ~~were~~December $031, ~~and~~2017, decreased $~~536~~25,~~538,~~862 ~~respectively~~or 8. ~~The~~8%, ~~expenses~~to in$268,660, ~~2015~~compared ~~arose from identified uncollectable receivables relating~~ to ~~our~~$294,522 ~~oil and natural gas properties either plugged and abandoned or scheduled~~ for ~~plugging~~the ~~and abandonment and our~~ year~~-end~~ ~~oil~~in ~~and natural gas reserve values~~2016. WeMarketing ~~periodically~~expense ~~review~~varies ~~our accounts receivable~~ from ~~working~~period ~~interest owners~~ to ~~determine~~period ~~whether~~according ~~collection~~to ofthe ~~any~~number of ~~these~~marketing ~~charges~~events ~~appears~~attended ~~doubtful. By~~by ~~contract,~~personnel ~~the~~and ~~Company~~their ~~may~~associated ~~not collect some charges from its Direct Working Interest owners for certain wells that ceased production or had been sold during the year, to the extent that these charges exceed production revenue~~costs.

~~The~~During ~~aggregate~~2017, ofinterest ~~supervisory~~expense ~~fees~~increased ~~and~~to ~~other income was~~ $~~675~~159,~~208~~268 ~~for~~from ~~the year ended December 31~~$114,159 in 2016, a ~~decrease of~~ $1845,~~952~~109 or 239.75% ~~from $694,160 during the year in 2015~~increase. This ~~decrease~~increase ~~was~~resulted ~~mainly~~from ~~due~~interest toaccrued ~~lower~~on ~~operations~~its ~~overhead~~convertible ~~and~~promissory ~~pipeline~~notes ~~fees~~issued ~~during~~in ~~2016,~~August ~~due to lower production volumes~~2016. ~~Supervisory~~Further ~~fees~~details ~~are~~concerning ~~charged~~Royale’s innotes ~~accordance~~payable ~~with~~can ~~the~~be ~~Council~~found ~~for~~in ~~Petroleum~~Capital ~~Accountants~~Resources ~~Societies (COPAS) policy for reimbursement of expenses associated with the joint accounting for billing, revenue disbursement,~~ and ~~payment of taxes and royalties. These charges are reevaluated each year and adjusted up or down as deemed appropriate by a published report to the industry by Ernst & Young~~Liquidity, ~~LLP, Certified Public Accountants~~below. ~~Supervisory fees decreased $96,881 or 19.2%, to $406,560 in 2016 from $503,441 in 2015.~~

~~Depreciation,~~In ~~depletion~~2017 and ~~amortization expense decreased to $283~~2016,~~874~~ ~~from~~we ~~$400,813~~did anot ~~decrease~~have ofan ~~$116,939~~income ortax ~~29.2%~~expense ~~for~~due to the ~~year~~use ~~ended~~of ~~December~~a ~~31,~~percentage ~~2016, as compared to 2015. The~~ depletion ~~rate~~carryover isvaluation ~~calculated~~allowance ~~using~~created ~~production~~from asthe acurrent ~~percentage~~and ofpast ~~reserves. This~~operations ~~decrease~~resulting in ~~depreciation~~an ~~expense~~effective ~~was~~tax ~~due to a lower depletion~~ rate asless ~~reserve~~than ~~volumes~~the ~~were~~normal ~~higher~~federal atrate ~~the end~~ of ~~2016~~34% ~~and~~plus ~~a lower asset base due to~~ the ~~sale~~relevant ofstate ~~our~~rates ~~Victor~~(mostly ~~Ranch~~California, ~~field interests~~8.8%).

~~General~~Capital ~~and~~Resources administrative expenses decreased by $567,069 or 17.8%, to $2,614,502 for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $3,181,571 for the year in 2015. This decrease was primarily due to employee related, salaries, insurance and taxes, cost reduction measures. Legal and accounting expense increased to $627,577 for the year, compared to $558,471 for 2015, a $69,106 or 12.4% increase. The increase in 2016 was mainly due to legal and accounting expenses related to the proposed merger.Liquidity

At December 31, 2017, Royale had current assets totaling $4,358,082 and current liabilities totaling $12,110,777, a $7,752,695 working capital deficit. We had cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2017 of $3,338,693 compared to $4,994,598 at December 31, 2016.

Ordinarily, we fund our operations and cash needs from our available credit and cash flows generated from operations. We believe that consummation of the Merger will enable the combined companies to meet their liquidity demands. However, because the Merger results in different liquidity needs than Royale had before the Merger, there is doubt as to the ability to meet liquidity demands through cash flow or ongoing operations. In that event, the Company will seek alternative capital sources through additional sales of equity or debt securities, or the sale of property.

At December 31, 2017, our other receivables, which consist of receivables from direct working interest investors and industry partners, totaled $764,015, compared to $676,647 at December 31, 2016, a $87,368 or 12.9% increase. This increase was mainly due to receivables from investors for workovers on a non-operated well. Royale’s revenue receivable at the end of 2017 was $106,007, a decrease of $197,521 or 65.1%, compared to $303,528 at the end of 2016, due to lower oil and gas production volumes when compared to year end 2016 due to our operated wells being offline in November and December 2017. At December 31, 2017, our accounts payable and accrued expenses totaled $4,638,879, an increase of $2,169,634 or 87.9% over the accounts payable at the end of 2016 of $2,469,245, mainly due to year end drilling activities, merger related trade accounts payable and non-operated workover costs.

Table of Contents

~~Marketing~~In ~~expense~~July ~~for~~2016, ~~the~~we ~~year~~received ~~ended~~a ~~December~~cash ~~31,~~investment ~~2016,~~of ~~decreased~~ $311,~~621~~580,000 orfrom ~~9.7%,~~two investors to purchase convertible promissory notes with principal amounts of $~~294~~1,~~522~~280,000 ~~compared~~and to$300,000, with a conversion price of $~~326~~0.40 per share,~~143~~ with warrants to purchase one share of common stock for every three shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes. The notes originally matured on August 2, 2017, one year infrom ~~2015~~the date of issuance, and carried a 10% interest rate, with a default rate of 25%. ~~Marketing~~ Shortly ~~expense~~before ~~varies~~completion ~~from~~of ~~period~~the toMerger, ~~period~~the ~~according~~$300,000 note was converted into 750,000 shares of Royale common stock, and Royale agreed to a cash settlement with the ~~number~~holder of ~~marketing~~the ~~events~~$1,280,000 ~~attended~~note byfor ~~personnel~~$1,900,000. See ~~and~~Item ~~their~~3, ~~associated~~Defaults ~~costs~~upon Senior Securities.

~~During~~In ~~2016~~December of 2013, ~~interest~~Royale ~~expense~~purchased ~~increased~~an tooffice building for $~~114~~2,~~159~~000,000, ~~from~~of which $86500,~~088~~000 was paid in ~~2015~~cash on the date of purchase, aand $281,~~071~~500,000 orwas ~~32.6%~~borrowed ~~increase~~from AmericanWest Bank, with a note secured by the property being purchased. ~~This~~The ~~increase~~note ~~resulted~~carried ~~from~~an interest ~~accrued~~rate onof ~~its~~5.75% ~~convertible~~until ~~promissory~~paid ~~notes issued~~ in ~~August~~full. In February 2016, Royale entered into a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of the office building for $2.5 million. ~~Further~~In ~~details~~June ~~concerning~~2016, ~~Royale’s~~the ~~notes~~sale ~~payable~~of ~~can~~the bebuilding ~~found~~was completed which resulted in ~~Capital~~a ~~Resources~~gain ~~and~~of ~~Liquidity~~$198,975 ~~below~~and the related principal and interest payments were paid in full.

InWe ~~2016~~have ~~and 2015, we did~~ not ~~have~~engaged anin ~~income~~hedging ~~tax~~activities ~~expense~~or ~~due to the~~ use ofderivative ainstruments ~~percentage~~to ~~depletion~~manage ~~carryover~~market ~~valuation allowance created from the current and past operations resulting in an effective tax rate less than the normal federal rate of 34% plus the relevant state rates (mostly California, 8~~risks.~~8%).~~

~~Capital~~The ~~Resources~~following schedule summarizes our known contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2017, and ~~Liquidity~~the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

At December 31, 2016, Royale Energy had current assets totaling $6,038,081 and current liabilities totaling $11,943,246, a $5,905,165 working capital deficit. We had cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2016 of $4,994,598 compared to $3,763,819 at December 31, 2015.

	Total Obligations		2018			2019-2020		2021	Beyond

Office Lease	$	515,296	$	119,286	$	250,606	$	131,602	$	13,802

~~Ordinarily,~~Operating weActivities. For ~~fund~~the ~~our~~years ~~operations~~ended ~~and~~December ~~cash~~31, ~~needs~~2017 ~~from our available credit~~ and 2016, cash ~~flows~~used ~~generated~~by ~~from~~operating ~~operations. We~~activities ~~believe~~totaled ~~that~~$1,199,439 ~~should~~and ~~the~~$3,271,631, ~~merger~~respectively. This ~~be consummated~~$2,072,192 ~~for~~or ~~the~~63.3% ~~foreseeable~~decrease ~~future~~in wecash ~~will~~used bewas ~~able~~mainly due to ~~meet~~higher ~~our~~accounts ~~liquidity~~payable ~~demands. However,~~and ~~should~~accrued ~~the~~expenses ~~merger~~mainly ~~fail~~related to ~~close,~~both ~~there~~drilling isactivities ~~doubt~~at asyear toend ~~the~~2017 ~~ability~~and tomerger ~~meet~~related ~~liquidity~~costs ~~demands~~during ~~through~~2017. During ~~cash~~the ~~flow~~year orin ~~ongoing operations. In that event~~2016, ~~the~~executive ~~Company~~management ~~will~~and ~~seek~~directors ~~alternative~~received ~~capital~~2,335,461 ~~sources~~compensatory ~~through~~shares ~~additional~~of ~~sales~~the ofCompany’s ~~equity~~common orstock ~~debt~~valued ~~securities~~at $645,986.

AtInvesting ~~December~~Activities. Net ~~31,~~cash ~~2016,~~used ~~our~~by ~~other~~investing ~~receivables~~activities totaled $456,466 ~~which~~for ~~consist~~the ofyear ~~receivables~~ended ~~from~~December ~~direct~~31, ~~working~~2017. Net ~~interest~~cash ~~investors~~provided ~~and~~by ~~industry~~investing ~~partners,~~activities totaled $~~676~~3,~~647~~208,378 ~~compared~~for tothe ~~$381,192~~nine atmonths ~~December~~ended ~~31,~~September ~~2015~~30, a2016. This $~~295~~3,~~455~~664,844 ordifference ~~77.5%~~in ~~decrease. This~~net ~~increase~~cash ~~was~~can ~~mainly~~be ~~due~~attributed to ~~new well placed into production during~~ the ~~year~~sale ~~whose~~of ~~operating~~our ~~costs~~office ~~were~~building ~~not~~and ~~yet recovered. Royale’s revenue receivable at~~ the ~~end~~proceeds received of ~~2016~~approximately ~~was~~ $~~303~~936,~~528~~000, aalong ~~decrease~~with of $~~155~~350,~~592~~000 orreceived ~~105.2%,~~from ~~compared to $147,936 at~~ the ~~end~~sale of ~~2015,~~our ~~due~~interests toin ~~higher oil and gas production from two new wells which began production during~~ the ~~fourth~~Victor ~~quarter~~Ranch ~~of 2016~~leases Additionally, ~~and higher natural gas commodity prices. At December 31, 2016,~~ our ~~accounts~~turnkey ~~payable~~drilling ~~and~~expenditures ~~accrued~~were ~~expenses~~higher ~~totaled~~in $22017,~~469,245,~~ awhere ~~decrease~~we ofdrilled ~~$467,981~~three ornatural ~~15.9%~~gas ~~over~~wells ~~the~~and ~~accounts~~participated ~~payable~~in at the ~~end~~drilling of ~~2015~~an ofadditional $2oil well,~~937,226,~~ ~~mainly~~while ~~due~~in to2016 ~~payments~~we ~~and~~drilled ~~settlements~~three ofnatural ~~trade~~gas ~~accounts payable during the year in 2016~~wells.

InFinancing ~~July~~Activities. No ~~2016,~~net wecash ~~entered~~was provided or used in ~~negotiations~~financing ~~with~~activities ~~two~~during ~~separate~~the ~~investors~~year toin ~~issue~~2017. Net ~~convertible~~cash ~~promissory~~provided ~~notes~~by offinancing ~~$1,280,000~~activities ~~and~~totaled $~~300~~1,~~000~~294,032 ~~with~~in a2016. During ~~conversion~~the ~~price~~year ofin ~~$0.40~~2016, ~~per share~~$1,580,000 ~~with~~was ~~warrants~~provided toby ~~purchase~~the ~~one~~Cash ~~share~~Advances offrom ~~common~~Pending ~~stock~~Transactions, ~~for~~mentioned ~~every~~earlier ~~three~~and ~~shares~~$1,446,853 ofwas ~~common~~used ~~stock~~for ~~issuable~~principal ~~upon~~payments ~~conversion~~on of the ~~notes. The~~Company’s ~~notes~~note ~~mature~~payable ~~one~~in ~~year from~~ the ~~date~~sale of ~~issuance~~its ~~and~~office ~~carry~~building. Also ain ~~10% interest rate~~2016, ~~which~~we isissued ~~due~~3,027,070 atrestricted ~~maturity. The~~common ~~conversion of the notes to~~ shares isand ~~subject to shareholder approval. The funds from these transactions is to be used to continue drilling activities~~789,658 ~~fund~~additional ~~expenses~~warrants toand bereceived ~~incurred~~cash inproceeds ~~connection with completion~~ of ~~Royale~~$1,160,885 ~~Energy’s~~under ~~proposed~~private ~~merger~~placement ~~with~~stock ~~Matrix Oil Corporation and for general corporate purposes~~sales. ~~Both~~In of2016, ~~these~~cash ~~negotiations~~used ~~are~~from ~~expected~~financing toactivities ~~conclude~~were inadded ~~the~~to ~~first~~working ~~quarter~~capital ~~of 2017~~ and asused ~~such~~for ~~were~~ordinary ~~included~~operating ~~as Cash Advances on Pending Transactions as December 31, 2016~~expenses.

InChanges ~~December of 2013, Royale purchased an office building for $2,000,000, of which $500,000 was paid~~ in ~~cash~~Reserve on the date of purchase, and $1,500,000 was borrowed from AmericanWest Bank, with a note secured by the property being purchased. The note carried an interest rate of 5.75% until paid in full. In February 2016, Royale Energy entered into a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of the office building for $2.5 million. In June 2016, the sale of the building was completed which resulted in a gain of $198,975 and the related principal and interest payments were paid in full.Estimates

InDuring ~~May 2015~~2017, weour ~~entered~~overall ~~into~~proved adeveloped ~~sales~~and ~~agreement~~undeveloped ~~with~~reserves ~~Roth~~increased ~~Capital,~~by ~~LLC~~4% ~~(Roth)~~and ~~relating~~our topreviously ~~the~~estimated ~~sale~~proved ofdeveloped ~~shares~~and ofundeveloped ~~our~~reserve ~~common~~quantities ~~stock~~were revised upward by approximately .31 million cubic feet of natural gas. ~~Pursuant~~This toupward ~~the~~revision ~~sales~~reflected ~~agreement,~~higher wethan ~~sold~~previously ~~701,397~~estimated ~~shares~~proved ofproducing ~~common~~and ~~stock~~non-producing tonatural ~~the~~gas ~~public~~reserves ~~for~~at ~~$556,123~~eight inCalifornia ~~2015. In~~wells ~~October~~and ~~2015,~~one weUtah ~~discontinued~~well. See ~~such~~Supplemental ~~sales~~Information about Oil and ~~the~~Gas ~~sales~~Producing ~~agreement~~Activities ~~was~~(Unaudited), ~~terminated~~page F-23.

OnDuring ~~November 25~~2016, ~~2015,~~our weoverall ~~entered~~proved ~~into~~developed ~~a securities purchase agreement~~ and ~~related~~undeveloped ~~agreements~~reserves ~~with~~decreased aby ~~group~~19% ofand ~~individual~~our ~~investors~~previously ~~pursuant~~estimated toproved adeveloped ~~registered~~and ~~direct~~undeveloped ~~offering. Under~~reserve ~~the~~quantities ~~terms~~were ofrevised ~~the~~upward ~~agreements,~~by ~~the~~approximately ~~investors~~.07 ~~purchased~~million ~~497,948~~cubic ~~shares~~feet of ~~Royale’s~~natural ~~common stock at $0~~gas.~~408~~ This ~~per~~upward ~~share,~~revision ~~and~~reflected ~~received~~higher ~~warrants~~than topreviously ~~purchase~~estimated upproved toproducing ~~248,973~~and ~~shares~~non-producing ~~(the~~natural ~~“Warrants’)~~gas ofreserves ~~stock~~ at ~~$1.00~~eight ~~per~~California ~~share~~wells ~~for~~and ~~three (3) years, for a total of $203,165 in gross proceeds,. Each Warrant becomes exercisable~~ one ~~year~~Louisiana ~~from the date of issuance~~well. ~~Each~~See ~~Warrant~~Supplemental ~~contains~~Information ~~customary~~about ~~adjustments~~Oil ~~for~~and ~~corporate~~Gas ~~events~~Producing ~~such~~Activities ~~as reorganizations~~(Unaudited), ~~splits,~~page ~~and dividends~~F-23.

We do not engage in hedging activities or use derivative instruments to manage market risks.

Table of Contents

The following schedule summarizes our known contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2016, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

		Total Obligations				2017				2018-2019				2020				Beyond
Office Lease		$	612,562			$	97,266			$	242,537			$	127,355			$	145,404

Operating Activities. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, cash used by operating activities totaled $3,271,631 and $3,973,180, respectively. This $701,549 or 17.7% decrease in cash used was mainly due to cost reduction measures and higher stock based compensation as executive management and members of the board of directors received common stock in lieu of cash compensation. During the year in 2016, executive management and directors received 2,335,461 compensatory shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $645,986.

Investing Activities. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, cash provided by investing activities was $3,208,378 and $4,014,879, respectively. This $806,501 or 20.1% decrease in cash provided in 2016 was primarily due to the sale of a portion of our leases in Alaska in 2015, from which we received proceeds of approximately $1.4 million. In 2015, we also received approximately $400,000 from the sale of a license agreement to our Alaska seismic survey and we received proceeds of approximately $500,000 from the sale of the company owned condominium located in San Diego, California. During 2016, approximately $936,000 was received from the sale of our office building and $350,000 was received from the sale of our interests in the Victor Ranch leases. Additionally, our turnkey drilling program proceeds and expenditures were higher in 2015, when we drilled four wells and purchased an interest in an existing well, while in 2016 we drilled three wells. The wells drilled in 2015 were higher in costs due to their locations and depths.

Financing Activities. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, cash provided by financing activities was $1,294,032 and $660,279, respectively. During 2016, $1,580,000 was provided by the Cash Advances from Investors, mentioned earlier and $1,446,853 was used for principal payments on the Company’s note payable in the sale of its office building. Also in 2016, we issued 3,027,070 restricted common shares and 789,658 additional warrants and received cash proceeds of $1,160,884 under private placement stock sales. During 2015, Royale issued 701,397 shares of its common stock and received net proceeds of $534,274 in a registered market equity offering program. Also in 2015, we received net proceeds of $153,876 and issued 485,486 shares of its common stock and 242,746 additional warrants in a registered direct offering. During the period in 2015, $29,031 was used for principal payments on the Company’s note payable. In 2016 and 2015, cash used from financing activities were added to working capital and used for ordinary operating expenses.

Changes in Reserve Estimates

During 2016, our overall proved developed and undeveloped reserves decreased by 19% and our previously estimated proved developed and undeveloped reserve quantities were revised upward by approximately .07 million cubic feet of natural gas. This upward revision reflected higher than previously estimated proved producing and non-producing natural gas reserves at eight California wells and one Louisiana well. See Supplemental Information about Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited), page F-20.

During 2015, our overall proved developed and undeveloped reserves decreased by 39% and our previously estimated proved developed and undeveloped reserve quantities were revised downward by approximately 1.3 million cubic feet of natural gas. This downward revision reflected lower than previously estimated proved producing and non-producing natural gas reserves at seven California wells and one Utah well. See Supplemental Information about Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited), page F-20.

Item 7 Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Royale ~~Energy~~ is exposed to market risk from changes in commodity prices and in interest rates. In ~~2016~~2017, we sold a majority of our natural gas at the daily market rate through the Pacific Gas & Electric pipeline. In ~~2016~~2017, our natural gas revenues were approximately $~~536~~550,000 with an average price of $2.3189 per MCF. At current production levels, a 10% per MCF increase or decrease in our average price received could potentially increase or decrease our natural gas revenues by approximately $5055,000. We currently do not sell any of our natural gas or oil through hedging contracts.

Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See pages F-1, et seq., included herein.

Table of Contents

Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls

Disclosure controls are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to insure that the information required to be filed is accumulated and communicated to our management in a manner designed to enable them to make timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our executive officers, Jonathan Gregory, Chief Executive Officer, Donald H. Hosmer, President of Business Development and Stephen M. Hosmer, President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness or our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the ~~2016~~2017 fiscal year. Based on their evaluation, they concluded that our disclosure controls are effective as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, which was the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in the SEC Commission Guidance Regarding Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The guidance sets forth an approach by which management can conduct a top-down, risk-based evaluation of internal control over financial reporting. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of risks to reliable financial reporting, whether controls exist to address those risks and evaluated evidence about the operation of the controls included in the evaluation based on its assessment of risk.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management identified an internal control deficiency that represents a material weakness in or internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, in that, certain legal documents, such as debt and equity financing transactions, during the fiscal year were not supported by fully executed agreements.

The control deficiency that gave rise to the material weakness did not result in a material misstatement of our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

Because of the material weakness described above, our management was unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the fiscal year to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management is seeking written acknowledgement of the note transactions from the note holders in order to remediate the material weakness described above and will require written acknowledgement from counterparties of all similar future transactions.13

Except for the actions described above that were taken to address the material weaknesses, there were no changes in our internal controls during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

Table of Contents

~~This~~Because ~~annual~~of ~~report~~the ~~does~~material ~~not~~weakness ~~include~~described anabove, ~~attestation~~our ~~report~~management ofwas ~~the~~unable ~~company's~~to ~~registered~~conclude ~~public~~that ~~accounting~~our ~~firm regarding~~ internal control over financial reporting. ~~Management's~~was ~~report~~effective ~~was~~as ~~not~~of ~~subject~~the end of the fiscal year to ~~attestation~~provide byreasonable assurance regarding the ~~company's~~reliability ~~registered~~of ~~public~~financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting ~~firm~~principles. ~~pursuant~~Management tois ~~temporary~~seeking ~~rules~~written acknowledgement of the ~~Securities~~note ~~and~~transactions ~~Exchange~~from ~~Commission~~the ~~that~~note ~~permit~~holders ~~the~~in ~~company~~order to ~~provide~~remediate ~~only~~the ~~management's~~material ~~report~~weakness indescribed ~~this~~above ~~annual~~and ~~report~~will require written acknowledgement from counterparties of all similar future transactions.

Except for the actions described above that were taken to address the material weaknesses, there were no changes in our internal controls during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the last fiscal quarter of ~~2016~~2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Any control system contains limitations imposed by resources and relevant cost considerations. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been addressed. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. In addition, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of a control. Our control system design is also based on assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot be sure that we have considered all possible future circumstances and events.

1514

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

~~Pursuant~~All toof ~~General~~our ~~Instruction~~directors Gserve toone ~~Form~~year ~~10-K,~~terms wefrom ~~incorporate~~the bytime ~~reference~~of ~~into~~their ~~this~~election ~~Item~~to the time their successor is elected and qualified. The following information is furnished with respect to beeach ~~disclosed~~director inand ~~our~~executive ~~definitive~~officer ~~proxy~~who ~~statement/prospectus~~served ~~for~~as ~~our~~such ~~2016~~during ~~Annual~~the ~~Meeting~~fiscal ofyear ~~Shareholders.~~ended December 31, 2017:

Name	Age	First Became Director or Executive Officer	Positions Held

Harry E. Hosmer	87	1986	Chairman of the Board
Donald H. Hosmer	63	1986	President of Business Development and Director
Stephen M. Hosmer	51	1996	President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Director
Ronald B Verdier (1) (3)	76	2015	Director
Jonathan Gregory	53	2014	Chief Executive Officer and Director
Gary Grinsfelder (1) (2) (3)	68	2007	Director
Ronald Buck (1) (2) (3)	82	2015	Director

(1) Member of the audit committee.

(2) Member of the compensation committee.

(3) Member of the nominations committee.

The board has determined that directors Gary Grinsfelder, Ronald Buck, and Ronald Verdier qualify as independent directors.

The following summarizes the business experience of each director and executive officer for the past six years.

Harry E. Hosmer – Chairman of the Board

Harry E. Hosmer has served as chairman since Royale began in 1986, and from inception in 1986 until June 1995, he also served as president and chief executive officer.

Jonathan Gregory – Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mr. Gregory was appointed Royale’s chief executive officer on September 10, 2015. Mr. Gregory has previously served as chief financial officer for private independent exploration and production companies, where he was actively engaged in multiple debt and equity financings, and overseeing acquisition and development activities. Mr. Gregory has over 20 years of oil and gas reserve based lending experience. Mr. Gregory is a member of Houston Energy Finance Group; and ADAM Houston Energy Network. He is also a Co-Founder of Bread of Life, Inc., a non-profit organization committed to empowering homeless Houstonians; and a past director of Small Steps Nurturing Center, a non-profit Christian organization that provides early childhood education for economically at-risk children in the inner-city of Houston, Texas. Mr. Gregory graduated from Lamar University in 1986 with a Bachelors degree in Finance.

Donald H. Hosmer – President of Business Development and Director

Donald H. Hosmer has served as an executive officer and director of Royale since its inception in 1986. In June 1995 he became president and chief executive officer. In October 2008, he became co-president and co-chief executive officer, with primary responsibility for marketing and investor/shareholder relations for the company. Donald H. Hosmer is the son of Harry E. Hosmer and brother of Stephen M. Hosmer.

Table of Contents

Stephen M. Hosmer – President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Director

Stephen M. Hosmer joined Royale as the management information systems manager in May 1988, responsible for developing and maintaining Royale’s computer software. Mr. Hosmer developed programs and software systems used by Royale. From 1991 to 1995, he served as president of Royale Operating Company, Royale’s operating subsidiary. In 1995, he became chief financial officer of Royale. In 1996, he was elected to the board of directors of Royale. In 2003, he was elected executive vice president. In October 2008, he became co-president and co-chief executive officer with primary responsibility for oil and gas exploration operations. Mr. Hosmer served three years on the board of directors of Exile International, a charitable organization based in Nashville, Tennessee. Mr. Hosmer served seven years on the board of directors of Youth for Christ, a charitable organization in San Diego, California. He currently serves on the board of Venture Expeditions (www.ventureexpeditions.org), a charitable organization based in Minneapolis MN. Stephen M. Hosmer is the son of Harry E. Hosmer and brother of Donald H. Hosmer. Mr. Hosmer holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as well as earning his MBA degree via the prestigious President/Key Executive program at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California.

Gary Grinsfelder – Director

Mr. Grinsfelder is a geologist and manager with 38 years’ experience in oil and gas exploration, exploitation and property evaluation. Currently Mr. Grinsfelder is an independent industry consultant. Previously, Mr. Grinsfelder was Vice President of Exploration at LeFrak Energy and President of TXCO Resources. He has also served in geologic and management roles for Output Exploration, LLC, Araxas Exploration, Inc., Triad Energy Corporation, Spartan Petroleum Corporation, American Petrofina Company of Texas, Union Oil Company of California and Degolyer and MacNaughton. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in 1972 from Southern Methodist University and has performed graduate studies at the University of Puerto Rico Department of Marine Science and University of Houston Department of Geology.

Ronald B Verdier

Mr. Verdier was appointed to the board in 2015 following the resignation of Tony Hall. Mr. Verdier is a retired banker who began his career in banking in 1968. He served as an employee and officer of Mercantile Trust & Savings Bank, Quincy, Illinois, for thirty-three years, ending as Senior Vice President. In 2002, Mr. Verdier retired from Mercantile Trust & Savings Bank and became President of Hannibal National Bank, Hannibal Missouri, where he served until his retirement in 2012. Mr. Verdier is a graduate of the School of Banking at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and of the School of Banking at the University of Oklahoma. Based on his qualifications, the board of directors has designated Mr. Verdier as an audit committee financial expert.

Ronald L. Buck

Mr. Buck was elected to the board in 2015. Mr. Buck received a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing and a Minor in Geology and Economics from Northwestern University. After building his business into a large scale distribution company, he sold the company to his two sons in 1992. Since 1992 he has been in finance and managing family assets including oil and gas wells and oil gathering pipeline investments. In this capacity, he also travels extensively to financial meetings and is a member of the National Association of Financial Advisors.

Audit Committee

The board has appointed an audit committee to assist the board of directors in carrying out its responsibility as to the independence and competence of the Company’s independent public accountants. All members of the audit committee are independent members of the board of directors. The audit committee operates pursuant to an audit committee charger, which has been adopted by the board of directors to define the committee’s responsibilities. A copy of the audit committee charter is posted on our website, www.royl.com The board has determined that Ronald Verdier qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

At the end of 2017, the members of the audit committee were Ronald Verdier, chair, Ronald Buck and Gary Grinsfelder.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for our directors and executive officers. The code is posted on our website, www.royl.com.

Table of Contents

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission regulations require that Royale’s directors, certain officers, and greater than 10 percent shareholders file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NASD and furnish Royale with copies of all such reports they file. Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to Royale, or representations from certain reporting persons that no reports were required, Royale believes that no persons failed to file required reports on a timely basis for 2017.

Item 11 Executive Compensation

~~Pursuant~~The tofollowing ~~General~~table ~~Instruction~~summarizes Gthe tocompensation ~~Form~~of ~~10-K~~the chief executive officer, wechief ~~incorporate~~financial byofficer ~~reference~~and ~~into~~the ~~this~~one ~~Item~~other most highly non-executive employees (the ~~information~~“named toexecutives beand ~~disclosed~~employees”) inof ~~our~~Royale ~~definitive~~and ~~proxy~~its ~~statement/prospectus~~subsidiaries ~~for~~during ~~our~~the ~~2016~~past ~~Annual~~year. No ~~Meeting~~stock ofoptions, ~~Shareholders~~stock awards or other plan based compensation awards were made during 2017.

						Option Awards (1)	All Other
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary (4)		Bonus		Option Awards (1)	Compensation (2)		Total

Jonathan Gregory, CEO (3) (4)	2017	$	242,469	$	-		$	-	$	242,469
	2016	$	242,469	$	-		$	-	$	242,469
	2015	$	70,823	$	-		$	-	$	70,823

Donald H. Hosmer	2017	$	236,331	$	-		$	19,090	$	255,421
President	2016	$	282,533	$	-		$	18,339	$	300,872
	2015	$	177,084	$	-		$	18,063	$	195,147

Stephen M. Hosmer (4)	2017	$	230,192	$	-		$	18,906	$	249,098
President, & CFO	2016	$	207,693	$	-		$	18,231	$	225,924
	2015	$	230,192	$	-		$	17,968	$	248,160

(1)

In October 2014, Donald Hosmer and Stephen Hosmer (together with the other members of the board of directors) were each granted 20,000 options to purchase common stock at an exercise or base price of $5.00 per shares, which vested during 2015. These options were granted for a period of 3 years and will expire on December 31, 2017. At December 29, 2017, Royale’s stock price, $0.36, was less than the weighted average exercise price, and as such the outstanding and exercisable stock options had no intrinsic value.

(2)

All other compensation consists of matching contributions to the Company’s simple IRA plan, except for Donald H. Hosmer and Stephen M. Hosmer, who also received a $12,000 car allowance.

(3)

During 2016 and 2015, Jonathan Gregory, Donald and Stephen Hosmer received a portion of their compensation in shares of common stock, valued at the closing market price on the date of grant, instead of cash. In 2016, of the $242,469 paid to Jonathan Gregory, $141,814 was paid in cash and 386,178 shares of common stock were issued, valued at $100,655. Of the $282,533 paid to Donald Hosmer, $190,595 was paid in cash and 609,702 shares of common stock were issued, valued at $91,938. Of the $207,693 paid to Stephen Hosmer, $165,742 was paid in cash and 101,630 shares of common stock were issued, valued at $41,951. In 2015, of the $70,823 paid to Jonathan Gregory, $21,581 was paid in cash and 108,644 shares of common stock were issued, valued at $49,242. Of the $230,192 paid to Stephen Hosmer, $173,945 was paid in cash and 200,564 shares of common stock were issued, valued at $56,247.

(4)

Mr. Gregory was appointed CEO (principal executive officer) in 2015.

Table of Contents

Stock Options and Equity Compensation; Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table presents the number of unexercised options at the 2017 year end for each named executive officer. No unvested stock awards were outstanding at the end of 2017.

Options
Name	Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable			Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable		Option exercise price ($)			Option expiration date

Jonathan Gregory		20,000	(1)		-		$	5.00	12/31/2017
Donald H. Hosmer		20,000	(1)		-		$	5.00	12/31/2017
Stephen M. Hosmer		20,000	(1)		-		$	5.00	12/31/2017

(1)	At the October 10, 2014 Board of Directors meeting, directors of Royale were granted 20,000 options each to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. These options expired on December 31, 2017.

Compensation Committee Report

Our executive compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on its discussion and review, has recommended that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Members of the Compensation Committee:

Ronald Buck and Gary Grinsfelder

All members of the compensation committee are independent members of the board of directors.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Our executive compensation policy is designed to motivate, reward and retain the key executive talent necessary to achieve our business objectives and contribute to our long-term success. Our compensation policy for our executive officers focuses primarily on determining appropriate salary levels and performance-based cash bonuses.

The elements of executive compensation at Royale consist mainly of cash salary and, if appropriate, a cash bonus at year end. The compensation committee makes recommendations to the board of directors annually on the compensation of the three top executives: Jonathan Gregory, Chief Executive Officer, Donald H. Hosmer, President of Business Development and Stephen M. Hosmer, President and Chief Financial Officer. We do not have employment contracts with either of our executive officers.

Royale also does not provide extensive personal benefits to its executives beyond those benefits, such as health insurance, that are provided to all employees. Donald Hosmer and Stephen Hosmer each receive an annual car allowance.

Table of Contents

Policy

The compensation committee’s primary responsibility is making recommendations to the board of directors relating to compensation of our officers. The committee also makes recommendations to the board of directors regarding employee benefits, our defined benefit plans, defined contribution plans, and stock based plans.

Determination

To determine executive compensation, the committee, in December each year, meets with our officers to review our compensation programs, discuss the performance of the company, the duties and responsibilities of each of the officers pay levels and business results compared to others similarly situated within the industry. The committee then makes recommendations to the board of directors for any adjustment to the officers’ compensation levels. The committee does not employ compensation consultants to make recommendations on executive compensation.

Compensation Elements

Base. Base salaries for our executive officers are established based on the scope of their responsibilities, taking into account competitive market compensation paid by our peers. Base salaries are reviewed annually. The salaries we paid to our most highly paid executive officers for the last three years are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table included under Executive Compensation.

Bonus. The compensation committee meets annually to determine the quantity, if any, of the cash bonuses of executive officers. The amount granted is based, subjectively, upon the company’s stock price performance, earnings, revenue, reserves and production. The committee does not use quantifiable metrics for these criteria; but rather uses each in balance to assess the strength of the company’s performance. The committee believes that formulaic approaches to cash incentives can foster an unhealthy balance between short-term and long-term goals. No bonuses were paid to executive officers in 2017 or 2016.

Compensation of Directors

In 2017, board members or committee member accrued or received fees for attendance at board meetings or committee meetings during the year. In addition to cash payments, common stock was issued in lieu of compensation or reimbursements. Royale also reimbursed directors for the expenses incurred for their services.

The following table describes the compensation paid to our directors who are not also named executives for their services in 2017.

Name	Fees earned or paid in cash or Common Stock		Stock awards		Option awards		All Other Compensation		Total
	($)		($)		($)		($)		($)
Harry E. Hosmer	$	25,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	25,000
Gary Grinsfelder	$	25,000	$	-	$	-		-	$	25,000
Ronald Buck	$	25,000	$	-	$	-		-	$	25,000
Ronald Verdier	$	25,000	$	-	$	-		-	$	25,000

Table of Contents

Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

~~Pursuant~~Common to General Instruction G to Form 10-K, we incorporate by reference into this Item the information to be disclosed in our definitive proxy statement/prospectus for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Stock

On February 27, 2018 (prior to the Merger), 21,850,185 shares of Royale’s common stock were outstanding.

The following table contains information regarding the ownership of Royale’s common stock as February 27, 2018, by:

i)	each person who is known by Royale to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of each class of equity securities;

ii)	each director and executive officer of Royale, and

iii)

all directors and officers of Royale as a group. Except pursuant to applicable community property laws and except as otherwise indicated, each shareholder identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to its or his shares. The holdings reported are based on reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Company by the officers, directors and 5% shareholders pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Stockholder (1)	Number		Percent

Harry E. Hosmer, (2) (3)		1,549,319		7.09	%

Donald H. Hosmer, (2)		1,475,864		6.75	%

Stephen M. Hosmer, (2) (4)		1,358,229		6.22	%

Ronald L. Buck (5)		84,688		*

Jonathan Gregory (6),		440,267		2.01	%

Gary Grinsfelder, (7)		126,093		*

Ronald Verdier		51,257		*

All officers and directors as a group		5,085,717		22.26	%

* Less than 1%

(1) The mailing address of each listed stockholder is 1870 Cordell Court, Suite 210, El Cajon, California 92020.

(2) Donald H. Hosmer and Stephen M. Hosmer are sons of Harry E. Hosmer, chairman of the board.

(3) Shares are owned by family trust.

(4) Includes 12,000 shares owned by Stephen M. Hosmer’s minor children.

(5) Includes 83,688 shares owned by a retirement trust.

(6) Includes 35,000 shares owned by Mr. Gregory’s son.

(7) Includes 49,257 shares owned by a retirement trust.

Table of Contents

Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

~~Pursuant~~In to1989, ~~General~~the ~~Instruction~~board Gof directors adopted a policy (the “1989 policy”) that permits each director and officer of Royale to ~~Form~~purchase ~~10-K~~from Royale, weat ~~incorporate~~its cost, up to one percent (1%) fractional interest in any well to be drilled by ~~reference~~Royale. When ~~into~~an ~~this~~officer ~~Item~~or director elects to make such a purchase, the ~~information~~amount charged per each percentage working interest is equal to beRoyale’s ~~disclosed~~actual inpro ~~our~~rata ~~definitive~~cost ~~proxy~~of ~~statement/prospectus~~drilling ~~for~~and ~~our~~completion, ~~2016~~rather ~~Annual~~than ~~Meeting~~the higher amount that Royale charges to working interest holders for the purchase of ~~Shareholders~~a percentage working interest in a well. Of the current officers and directors, Donald Hosmer, Stephen Hosmer and Harry E. Hosmer at various times have elected under the 1989 policy to purchase interests in certain wells Royale has drilled.

Under the 1989 policy, officers and directors may elect to participate in wells at any time up until drilling of the prospect begins. Participants are required to pay all direct costs and expenses through completion of a well, whether or not the well drilling and completion expenses exceed Royale’s cost estimates, instead of paying a set, turnkey price (as do outside investors who purchase undivided working interests from Royale). Thus, they participate on terms similar to other oil and gas industry participants or joint venturers. Participants are invoiced in advance for their share of estimated direct costs of drilling and completion and later actual costs are reconciled, as Royale incurs expenses and participants make further payments as necessary.

Officer and director participants under this program do not pay some expenses paid by outside, retail investors in working interests, such as sales commissions, if any, or marketing expenses. The outside, turnkey drilling agreement investors, on the other hand, are not obligated to pay additional costs if a drilling project experiences cost overruns or unanticipated expenses in the drilling and completion stage. Accordingly, Royale’s management believes that its officers and directors who participate in wells under the board of directors’ policy do so on terms the same as could be obtained by unaffiliated oil and gas industry participants in arms-length transactions, albeit those terms are different than the turnkey agreement under which outside investors purchase fractional undivided working interests from Royale.

Donald and Stephen Hosmer each have participated individually in 179 wells each under the 1989 policy. The Hosmer Trust, a trust for the benefit of family members of Harry E. Hosmer, has participated in 178 wells.

Investments in wells under the 1989 policy for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 are as follows:

	Year	# of fractional interests		Amount
Donald Hosmer	2017		-	$	-
	2016		1	$	1,556
	2015		2	$	3,143
Stephen Hosmer	2017		-	$	-
	2016		1	$	1,556
	2015		4	$	4,389
Hosmer Trust	2017		-	$	-
	2016		1	$	1,556
	2015		4	$	5,633

Prior to July 2016, Royale’s chairman of the board and former president, Harry E. Hosmer, rendered management consulting services to Royale. Royale compensated Mr. Hosmer $96,635 and $165,660 for his consulting services in 2016 and 2015, respectively, and paid his medical insurance costs. Mr. Hosmer’s still serves on the board of directors, for which he receives reimbursement of expenses to attend meetings.

Table of Contents

Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services

~~Pursuant~~SingerLewak toLLP ~~General~~served ~~Instruction~~as Gthe independent auditors to ~~Form~~audit ~~10-K,~~the weCompany’s ~~incorporate~~financial bystatements ~~reference~~for ~~into~~the ~~this~~fiscal ~~Item~~year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. This is the ~~information~~fourth toannual beaudit ~~disclosed~~performed inby ~~our~~SingerLewak ~~definitive~~LLP. The ~~proxy~~aggregate ~~statement/prospectus~~fees billed by SingerLewak LLP for ~~our~~the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~Annual~~are ~~Meeting~~as offollows, ~~Shareholders.~~respectively:

	2017		2016
Audit fees (1)	$	184,352	$	139,413
Tax fees (2)	$	-	$	-
All other fees (3)	$	113,387	$	18,638
Total	$	297,739	$	158,051

(1) Audit fees are fees for professional services rendered for the audit of Royale Energy’s annual financial statements, reviews of financial statements included in the company’s Forms 10-Q, and reviews of documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

(2) Tax fees consist of tax planning, consulting and tax return reviews.

(3) Other fees consist of work on registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933.

The audit committee of Royale Energy has adopted policies for the pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by the company’s independent auditor. The policy requires pre-approval by the audit committee of specifically defined audit and non-audit services. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to that year, the audit committee must approve the permitted service before the independent auditor is engaged to perform it.

No representatives of SingerLewak LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting. Although the audit committee has the sole responsibility to appoint the auditors as required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the committee welcomes any comments from shareholders on auditor selection or performance. Comments may be sent to the audit committee chair, Ronald Verdier, care of Royale Energy’s executive office, 1870 Cordell Court, Suite 210, El Cajon, California 92020.

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

The agreements included as exhibits to this report are included to provide information about their terms and not to provide any other factual or disclosure information about Royale ~~Energy~~ or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement that were made solely for the benefit of the other agreement parties and:

· should not be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk among the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; · have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; · may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from the way investors may view materiality; and · were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

·	have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

·	may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from the way investors may view materiality; and

·	were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

1.	Financial Statements. See Index to Financial Statements, page F-1

2. Schedules. Supplemental Information About Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited) begins on page F-2023.

3.	Exhibits. Certain of the exhibits listed in the following index are incorporated by reference.

2.1	Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger among Royale Energy, Inc., Royale Energy Holdings, Inc., Royale Merger Sub, Inc., Matrix Merger Sub, Inc., and Matrix Oil Management Corporation, ~~incorporated~~filed byas ~~reference to~~ Exhibit 2.1, Annex A to ~~Royale~~the ~~Energy’s Registration Statement on~~ Form S-4/A of Royale Energy Holdings, Inc., filed ~~February~~July 1421, 2017.
2.2	~~Form~~Amendment ofNo. ~~Preferred~~7 ~~Exchange~~to ~~Agreement~~the ~~with~~Amended ~~the~~and ~~holders~~Restated ofAgreement ~~all~~and Plan of Merger among Royale Energy, Inc., the Company, Royale Merger Sub, Inc., Matrix ~~Preferred~~Merger ~~Interests~~Sub, ~~incorporated~~Inc., byand ~~reference~~Matrix toOil Management Corporation, filed as Exhibit 2.2, ~~Annex~~to Bthe toForm 8-A of Royale Energy’s ~~Registration~~Holdings, ~~Statement~~Inc. on(Commission ~~Form~~File SNo. 000-455912), filed ~~February~~March 148, ~~2017.~~2018
2.3	~~Form~~Joint Waiver of LPClosing ~~Exchange~~Conditions ~~Agreement~~ between ~~Royale~~Matrix ~~Energy,~~Oil ~~Inc.~~Management Corporation, ~~Royale~~on ~~Energy~~behalf ~~Holdings,~~of ~~Inc.,~~itself and ~~holders~~as ofgeneral LPpartner ~~Interests~~ of Matrix Investments, L.P., ~~other~~Matrix ~~than~~Permian ~~Preferred~~Investments, LP, ~~Interests~~, ~~incorporated~~Matrix byLas ~~reference~~Cienegas toLimited Partnership, Matrix Oil Corporation, and all of the holders of preferred limited partnership interests of Matrix Investments (February 28, 2018), filed as Exhibit 2.3,6 ~~Annex~~to Cthe toForm 8-A of Royale Energy’s ~~Registration~~Holdings, ~~Statement~~Inc. on(Commission ~~Form~~File SNo. 000-455912), filed ~~February~~March 148, ~~2017.~~2018
2.4	Form of LP Exchange Agreement between Royale Energy, Inc., Royale Energy Holdings, Inc., and holders of LP Interests of Matrix Las Cienegas Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4, Annex D to Royale Energy’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed February 14, 2017.
2.5	Form of LP Exchange Agreement between Royale Energy, Inc., Royale Energy Holdings, Inc., and holders of all LP Interests of Matrix Permian Investments, L.P. , incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5, Annex E to Royale Energy’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed February 14, 2017.
2.6	Form of Matrix Operator Stock Exchange Agreement between Royale Energy, Inc., Royale Energy Holdings, Inc., and the holders of all outstanding common stock of Matrix Oil Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6, Annex F to Royale Energy’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed February 14, 2017.
2.7	Form of Section 351 Plan of Merger and Exchange, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.7, Annex G to Royale Energy’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed February 14, 2017.
2.8	This Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 30, 2017, filed herewith.
3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation of Royale Energy, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Royale Energy’s Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2009.
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Royale Energy, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23 of Royale Energy’s Form 10-K filed March 27, 2009.
3.3	Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Royale Energy, Inc., a California corporation (March 7, 2018), filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2018, filed March 12, 2018
10.1	Consent To Merger, Joinder, Waiver And Fourth Amendment To Term Loan Agreement between Matrix Oil Corporation, Matrix Pipeline LP, Matrix Oil Management Corporation, Matrix Las Cienegas Limited Partnership, Matrix Investments, L.P., Matrix Permian Investments, LP, Matrix Royalty, LP, Royale Energy Holdings, Inc., Royale Energy, Inc., Arena Limited SPV, LLC, Arena Limited SPV, LLC, , and Cargill Incorporated (February 28, 2018), filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2018, filed March 12, 2018
10.2	Pledge Agreement by Royale Energy, Inc., in favor of Arena Limited SPV, LLC (February 28, 2018) ), filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2018, filed March 12, 2018
21.1	Subsidiaries, filed herewith.
23.1	Consent of SingerLewak L.L.P., filed herewith.
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a), 115d-14(a) Certification, filed herewith.
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a), 115d-14(a) Certification, filed herewith.
31.3	Rule 13a-14(a), 115d-14(a) Certification, filed herewith.
32.1	Section 1350 Certification, filed herewith.
32.2	Section 1350 Certification, filed herewith.
32.3	Section 1350 Certification, filed herewith.
99.1	Report of Netherland Sewell & Associates, Inc., filed herewith.
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

1723

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		Royale Energy, Inc.
		Royale Energy Funds, Inc.
Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Jonathan Gregory
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Jonathan Gregory
		Jonathan Gregory
		Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Harry E. Hosmer
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Harry E. Hosmer
		Harry E. Hosmer
		Chairman of the Board of Directors
Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Donald H. Hosmer
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Donald H. Hosmer
		Donald H. Hosmer
		Director, and President of Business Development
Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Stephen M. Hosmer
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Stephen M. Hosmer
		Stephen M. Hosmer
		Director, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Ronald Buck
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Ronald Buck
		Ronald Buck
		Director
Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Ronald Verdier
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Ronald Verdier
		Ronald Verdier
		Director
Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Gary Grinsfelder
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Gary Grinsfelder
		Gary Grinsfelder
		Director
Date: March 31, 2017		/s/ Jonathan Gregory
Date: March 23, 2018		/s/ Jonathan Gregory
		Jonathan Gregory
		Director, Chief Executive Officer

1824

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

(Formerly known as Royale Energy, Inc.)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF SINGERLEWAK LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	F-2
BALANCE SHEETS	F-34
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	F-56
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	F-67
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	F-78
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-89
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ABOUT OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES	F-2223

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Royale Energy Funds, Inc.

~~Royale~~Opinion ~~Energy,~~on ~~Inc.~~the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Royale Energy Funds, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and ~~2015~~2017, ~~and~~ the related statements of comprehensive loss, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements (collectively, the “financial statements”). ~~These~~In our opinion, the financial statements ~~are~~present fairly, in all material respects, the ~~responsibility~~financial position of the Company's ~~management.~~as ~~Our~~of ~~responsibility~~December is31, to2016 ~~express~~and an2017, ~~opinion~~and onthe ~~these~~results ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~its ~~based~~operations onand ~~our~~its ~~audits~~cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

WeGoing conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.Concern

InThe ~~our~~accompanying ~~opinion,~~financial statements have been prepared assuming that the ~~financial~~Company ~~statements~~will ~~referred~~continue toas ~~above~~a ~~present~~going ~~fairly,~~concern. As discussed in ~~all~~Note ~~material~~1 ~~respects,~~to the financial ~~position~~statements, ofthe ~~Royale~~Company ~~Energy~~has ~~Inc.~~suffered asrecurring oflosses ~~December~~from 31operations, ~~2016~~its ~~and~~total ~~2015~~liabilities exceed its total assets, and ~~the~~it ~~results~~has ofan ~~its~~accumulated ~~operations~~stockholders’ ~~and~~deficit. ~~its~~This ~~cash~~raises ~~flows~~substantial ~~for~~doubt about the ~~years~~Company's ~~then~~ability ~~ended,~~to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in ~~conformity~~regard ~~with~~to Uthese matters also are described in Note 1.S. ~~generally~~The ~~accepted~~financial ~~accounting~~statements ~~principles~~do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~The~~Basis ~~accompanying~~for financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, its total liabilities exceed its total assets and it has an accumulated stockholders’ deficit. This raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

F-2

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Royale Energy Funds, Inc.

Page Two

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

SingerLewak LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Los Angeles, California

March 3123, ~~2017~~ 2018

F-2

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

	2016		2015
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	4,994,598	$	3,763,819
Other Receivables, net		676,647		381,192
Revenue Receivables		303,528		147,936
Prepaid Expenses		63,308		114,036
Total Current Assets		6,038,081		4,406,983
Other Assets		610,779		730,844
Oil And Gas Properties (Successful Efforts Basis), Real Property and Equipment and Fixtures, net		1,733,424		6,532,478
Total Assets	$	8,382,284	$	11,670,305

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017 AND ~~2015~~2016

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
ASSETS
Current Liabilities:
Current Assets:
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses	$	2,469,245		$	2,937,226
Cash	$	3,338,693		$	4,994,598
Cash Advances on Pending Transactions		1,580,000			-
Other Receivables, net		764,015			676,647
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt		-			30,528
Revenue Receivables		106,007			303,528
Deferred Drilling Obligations		7,894,001			8,415,528
Prepaid Expenses		149,367			63,308
Total Current Liabilities		11,943,246			11,383,282
Total Current Assets		4,358,082			6,038,081
Noncurrent Liabilities:
Other Assets		511,120			610,779
Asset Retirement Obligation		952,110			1,096,179
Oil And Gas Properties (Successful Efforts Basis), Real Property and Equipment and Fixtures, net		1,302,242			1,733,424
Note Payable, less current portion		-			1,416,325
Total Assets	$	6,171,444		$	8,382,284
Total Noncurrent Liabilities		952,110			2,512,504
Total Liabilities		12,895,356			13,895,786
Stockholders' Deficit:
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series AA, No Par Value, 147,500 Shares Authorized; 0 and 46,662 Shares Issued and Outstanding, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, Respectively		-			136,149
Common Stock, No Par Value, 30,000,000 Shares Authorized; 21,836,033 and 16,396,579 Shares Issued and Outstanding, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		41,265,449			39,272,429
Accumulated Deficit		(45,778,521	)		(41,634,059	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(4,513,072	)		(2,225,481	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	8,382,284		$	11,670,305

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

~~STATEMENTS~~BALANCE ~~OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS~~SHEETS

~~FOR THE YEARS ENDED~~ DECEMBER 31, ~~2016,~~2017 AND ~~2015~~2016

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Revenues:
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Sale of Oil and Gas	$	538,631		$	1,018,928
Current Liabilities:
Supervisory Fees and Other		675,208			694,160
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses	$	4,638,879		$	2,469,245
Total Revenues		1,213,839			1,713,088
Cash Advances on Pending Transactions		1,580,000			1,580,000
Costs and Expenses:
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt		-			-
General and Administrative		2,614,502			3,181,571
Deferred Drilling Obligations		5,891,898			7,894,001
Lease Operating		594,241			1,000,769
Total Current Liabilities		12,110,777			11,943,246
Delay Rentals		-			448,313
Noncurrent Liabilities:
Lease Impairment		2,071,849			424,163
Asset Retirement Obligation		1,000,908			952,110
Well Equipment Write Down		19,151			60,960
Note Payable, less current portion		-			-
Bad Debt Expense		-			536,538
Total Noncurrent Liabilities		1,000,908			952,110
Legal and Accounting		627,577			558,471
Total Liabilities		13,111,685			12,895,356
Marketing		294,522			326,143
Stockholders’ Deficit:
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization		283,874			400,813
Common Stock, No Par Value, 30,000,000 Shares Authorized; 21,850,185 and 21,836,033 Shares Issued and Outstanding, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		41,265,449			41,265,449
Total Costs and Expenses		6,505,716			6,937,741
Accumulated Deficit		(48,205,690	)		(45,778,521	)
Gain on Turnkey Drilling Programs		460,210			2,330,969
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(6,940,241	)		(4,513,072	)
Loss from Operations		(4,831,667	)		(2,893,684	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	6,171,444		$	8,382,284
Other Income (Expense):
Interest Expense		(114,159	)		(86,088	)
Gain on Sale of Assets		483,394			968,956
Gain on Settlement of Accounts Payable		341,751			-
Loss on Disposal of Assets		(23,781	)		-
Loss Before Income Tax Expense		(4,144,462	)		(2,010,816	)
Provision for Income Taxes		-			-
Net Loss		(4,144,462	)		(2,010,816	)
Basic Loss Per Share		(0.22	)		(0.13	)
Diluted Loss Per Share		(0.22	)		(0.13	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unrealized Loss on Equity Securities		-			-
Less: Reclassification Adjustment for Losses Included in Net Income		-			(6,503	)
Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss) before tax		-			6,503
Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss), net of tax		-			6,503
Comprehensive Loss		(4,144,462	)		(2,004,313	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF ~~STOCKHOLDERS'~~COMPREHENSIVE ~~DEFICIT~~LOSS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017, ~~and~~AND ~~2015~~2016

							Preferred Stock
	2017			2016
	Common Stock						Series AA									Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Revenues:
	Number of Shares Issued and Outstanding						Number of Shares Issued and Outstanding
Sale of Oil and Gas	$	554,235		$	538,631
													Accumulated Deficit
Supervisory Fees and Other		453,144			675,208
				Amount						Amount									Total
Total Revenues		1,007,379			1,213,839
Balance, December 31, 2014		14,945,789		$	38,352,370			46,662		$	136,149		$	(39,623,243	)	$	(6,503	)	$	(1,141,227	)
Costs and Expenses:
Common Stock Private Placement Sale		701,397		$	490,116															490,116
Lease Operating		435,637			594,241
Director’s Stock Option Grant					86,877															86,877
Lease Impairment		289,775			2,071,849
Common Stock RDO Private Placement Sale		485,486			199,195															199,195
Well Equipment Write Down		16,375			19,151
Common Stock Issued to Executives in lieu of Compensation		263,907			143,871															143,871
Bad Debt Expense		164,145			-
Available for Sale Securities – Reclassification Adjustment for Losses Included in Net Income																	6,503			6,503
General and Administrative		2,005,630			2,614,502
Net Loss														(2,010,816	)					(2,010,816	)
Legal and Accounting		1,540,190			627,577
Balance, December 31, 2015		16,396,579		$	39,272,429			46,662		$	136,149		$	(41,634,059	)	$	-		$	(2,225,481	)
Marketing		268,660			294,522
Common Stock Private Placement Sale		3,027,070			1,160,885															1,160,885
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization		116,017			283,874
Common Stock Issued to Executives in lieu of Compensation		2,335,461			645,986															645,986
Total Costs and Expenses		4,836,429			6,505,716
Issuance of Common Stock in Settlement of AP		76,923			50,000															50,000
Gain on Turnkey Drilling Programs		1,487,824			460,210
Preferred Series AA Converted to Common Stock		23,331			136,149			(46,662	)		(136,149	)								-
Loss from Operations		(2,341,226	)		(4,831,667	)
Net Loss														(4,144,462	)					(4,144,462	)
Other Income (Expense):
Balance, December 31, 2016		21,859,364		$	41,265,449			-		$	-		$	(45,778,521	)	$	-		$	(4,513,072	)
Interest Expense		(159,268	)		(114,159	)
Gain on Sale of Assets		-			483,394
Gain on Settlement of Accounts Payable		73,325			341,751
Loss on Disposal of Assets		-			(23,781	)
Loss Before Income Tax Expense		(2,427,169	)		(4,144,462	)
Provision for Income Taxes		-			-
Net Loss		(2,427,169	)		(4,144,462	)
Basic Loss Per Share		(0.11	)		(0.22	)
Diluted Loss Per Share		(0.11	)		(0.22	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unrealized Loss on Equity Securities		-			-
Less: Reclassification Adjustment for Losses Included in Net Income		-			-
Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss) before tax		-			-
Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss), net of tax		-			-
Comprehensive Loss		(2,427,169	)		(4,144,462	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF ~~CASH~~STOCKHOLDERS’ ~~FLOWS~~DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	2016			2015
							Preferred Stock
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Common Stock						Series AA									Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net (Loss)	$	(4,144,462	)	$	(2,010,816	)
	Number of Shares Issued and Outstanding						Number of Shares Issued and Outstanding
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used by Operating Activities:
													Accumulated Deficit
Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization		283,874			400,813
				Amount						Amount								Total
Lease Impairment		2,071,849			424,163
Balance, December 31, 2015		16,396,579		$	39,272,429			46,662		$	136,149		$	(41,634,959	)	$	-	$	(2,225,481	)
Gain on Sale of Assets		(483,394	)		(968,956	)
Common Stock Private Placement Sale		3,027,070		$	1,160,885														1,160,885
Gain on Turnkey Drilling Programs		(460,210	)		(2,330,969	)
Issuance of Common Stock in Settlement of AP		76,923			50,000														50,000
Gain on Settlement of Accounts Payable		(341,751	)		-
Common Stock RDO Private Placement Sale
Loss on Disposal of Assets		23,781			-
Common Stock Issued to Executives in lieu of Compensation		2,335,461			645,986														645,986
Bad Debt Expense		-			536,538
Preferred Series AA Converted to Common Stock		-			136,149			(46,662	)		(136,149	)							-
Stock-Based Compensation		645,986			230,749
Net Loss														(4,144,462	)				(4,144,462	)
Realized Loss on Equity Securities		-			6,503
Balance, December 31, 2016		21,836,033		$	41,265,449			-		$	-		$	(45,778,521	)	$	-	$	(4,513,072	)
Well Equipment and Other Assets Write Down		19,151			60,960
Common Stock Private Placement Sale		-			-														-
(Increase) Decrease in:
Common Stock Issued to Executives in lieu of Compensation		52,613			25,000														25,000
Other & Revenue Receivables		(451,047	)		1,187,810
Issuance of Common Stock in Settlement of AP - Adjustment		(38,461	)		(25,000	)													(25,000	)
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		151,642			(236,615	)
Preferred Series AA Converted to Common Stock		-			-														-
Increase (Decrease) in:
Net Loss														(2,427,169	)				(2,427,169	)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses		(587,050	)		(1,273,360	)
Balance, December 31, 2017		21,850,185		$	41,265,449			-		$	-		$	(48,205,690	)	$	-	$	(6,940,241	)
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities		(3,271,631	)		(3,973,180	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Expenditures for Oil And Gas Properties		(2,058,357	)		(3,753,134	)
Proceeds from Turnkey Drilling Programs		3,980,499			5,433,476
Proceeds from Sale of Assets		1,286,236			2,334,537
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities		3,208,378			4,014,879
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash Advances From Investors		1,580,000			-
Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt		(1,446,853	)		(29,031	)
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock		1,160,885			689,310
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		1,294,032			660,279
Net Increase in Cash		1,230,779			701,978
Cash at Beginning of Year		3,763,819			3,061,841
Cash at End of Year	$	4,994,598		$	3,763,819
Cash Paid for Interest	$	48,325			86,088
Cash Paid for Taxes	$	2,100			1,000
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Transactions:
Conversion of Series AA Stock to Common Stock	$	136,149		$	-
Reclassification Adjustment for Losses Included in Net Income	$	-		$	(6,503	)
Warrants Issued with Common Stock	$	156,205		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-7

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 and 2016

	2017			2016

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (Loss)	$	(2,427,169	)	$	(4,144,462	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used by Operating Activities:
Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization		116,017			283,874
Lease Impairment		289,775			2,071,849
Gain on Sale of Assets		-			(483,394	)
Gain on Turnkey Drilling Programs		(1,487,824	)		(460,210	)
Gain on Settlement of Accounts Payable		(73,325	)		(341,751	)
Loss on Disposal of Assets		-			23,781
Bad Debt Expense		164,145			-
Stock-Based Compensation		-			645,986
Realized Loss on Equity Securities		-			-
Well Equipment and Other Assets Write Down		16,375			19,151
(Increase) Decrease in:
Other & Revenue Receivables		(53,992	)		(451,047	)
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		13,600			151,642
Increase (Decrease) in:
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses		2,242,959			(587,050	)
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities		(1,199,439	)		(3,271,631	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Expenditures for Oil And Gas Properties		(4,388,967	)		(2,058,357	)
Proceeds from Turnkey Drilling Programs		3,932,501			3,980,499
Proceeds from Sale of Assets		-			1,286,236
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities		(456,466	)		3,208,378

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash Advances From Investors		-			1,580,000
Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt		-			(1,446,853	)
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock		-			1,160,885

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		-			1,294,032
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(1,655,905	)		1,230,779

Cash at Beginning of Year		4,994,598			3,763,819

Cash at End of Year	$	3,338,693		$	4,994,598

Cash Paid for Interest	$	1,268			48,325

Cash Paid for Taxes	$	1,539			2,100

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Transactions:
Conversion of Series AA Stock to Common Stock	$	-		$	136,149
Asset Retirement Obligation Addition	$	65,461		$	-
Issuance of Common Stock for Accrued Compensation Expense	$	25,000			-
Warrants Issued with Common Stock	$	-		$	156,205

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-8

Table of Contents

ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies of Royale Energy Funds, Inc. (formerly known as Royale Energy, Inc., and in these notes sometimes called “Royale Energy,” “Royale,” or the “Company”) is presented to assist in understanding Royale Energy'’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of Royale Energy'’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Description of Business

Royale Energy is an independent oil and gas producer which also has operations in the area of turnkey drilling. Royale Energy owns wells and leases in major geological basins located primarily in California, Texas, Oklahoma and Utah. Royale Energy offers fractional working interests and seeks to minimize the risks of oil and gas drilling by selling multiple well drilling projects which do not include the use of debt financing.

Use of Estimates

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has negative working capital, losses from operations and negative cash flows from operations.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the estimate of Company oil and gas reserves prepared by an independent engineering consultant. Such estimates are subject to numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proven reserves. Estimated reserves are used in the calculation of depletion, depreciation and amortization, unevaluated property costs, impairment of oil and natural gas properties, estimated future net cash flows, taxes, and contingencies.

Liquidity and going concern

The primary sources of liquidity have historically been issuances of common stock and operations. We believe that the completion of the contemplated merger with will enable us to return to positive cash flow. There is some doubt about the company’s ability to meet liquidity demands, and we anticipate that our primary sources of liquidity will be from the issuance of debt and/or equity, and the sale of oil and natural gas property participation interest.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements reflect an accumulated deficit of $4548,~~778~~205,~~521~~690, a working capital deficiency of $57,~~905~~752,~~165~~695 and a stockholders’ deficit of $46,~~513~~940,~~072~~241. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management’s plans to alleviate the going concern include the proposed merger with Matrix and additional financing through issuances of common stock and the reduction of overhead costs. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed or that management will be able to obtain financing on terms acceptable to the Company and whether the Company will become profitable and generate positive operating cash flow. If the Company is unable to raise sufficient additional funds, it will have to develop and implement a plan to further extend payables, attempt to extend note repayments, and reduce overhead until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operations. There can be no assurance that such a plan will be successful.

Revenue Recognition

Royale’s primary business is oil and gas production. Natural gas flows from the wells into gathering line systems, which are equipped occasionally with compressor systems, which in turn flow into metered transportation and customer pipelines. Monthly, price data and daily production are used to invoice customers for amounts due to Royale Energy and other working interest owners. Royale Energy operates virtually all of its own wells and receives industry standard operator fees.

Royale Energy generally sells crude oil and natural gas under short-term agreements at prevailing market prices. Revenues are recognized when the products are delivered, which occurs when the customer has taken title and has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, prices are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

F-89

Table of Contents

Revenues from the production of oil and natural gas properties in which the Royale Energy has an interest with other producers are recognized on the basis of Royale Energy’s net working interest. Differences between actual production and net working interest volumes are not significant.

Royale Energy’s financial statements include its pro rata ownership of wells. Royale Energy usually sells a portion of the working interest in each well it drills or participates in to third party investors and retains a portion of the prospect for its own account. Royale Energy generally retains about a 50% working interest. All results, successful or not, are included at its pro rata ownership amounts: revenue, expenses, assets, and liabilities as defined in FASB ASC 932-323-25 and 932-360.

Oil and Gas Property and Equipment

Royale Energy uses the “successful efforts” method to account for its exploration and production activities. Under this method, Royale Energy accumulates its proportionate share of costs on a well-by-well basis with certain exploratory expenditures and exploratory dry holes being expensed as incurred, and capitalizes expenditures for productive wells. Royale Energy amortizes the costs of productive wells under the unit-of-production method.

Royale Energy carries, as an asset, exploratory well costs when the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and where Royale Energy is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Exploratory well costs not meeting these criteria are charged to expense. Other exploratory expenditures, including geophysical costs and annual lease rentals, are expensed as incurred.

Acquisition costs of proved properties are amortized using a unit-of-production method, computed on the basis of total proved oil and gas reserves.

Production costs are expensed as incurred. Production involves lifting the oil and gas to the surface and gathering, treating, field processing and field storage of the oil and gas. The production function normally terminates at the outlet valve on the lease or field production storage tank. Production costs are those incurred to operate and maintain Royale Energy’s wells and related equipment and facilities. They become part of the cost of oil and gas produced. These costs, sometimes referred to as lifting costs, include such items as labor costs to operate the wells and related equipment; repair and maintenance costs on the wells and equipment; materials, supplies and energy costs required to operate the wells and related equipment; and administrative expenses related to the production activity.

Proved oil and gas properties held and used by Royale Energy are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

Royale Energy estimates the future undiscounted cash flows of the affected properties to judge the recoverability of carrying amounts. Cash flows used in impairment evaluations are developed using annually updated evaluation assumptions for crude oil commodity prices. Annual volumes are based on field production profiles, which are also updated annually. Prices for natural gas and other products are based on assumptions developed annually for evaluation purposes.

Impairment analyses are generally based on proved reserves. An asset group would be impaired if the undiscounted cash flows were less than its carrying value. Impairments are measured by the amount the carrying value exceeds fair value. During ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, impairment losses of $2289,~~071,849~~775 and $~~424~~2,~~163~~071,849, respectively, were recorded on various capitalized lease and land costs that were no longer viable.

Significant unproved properties are assessed for impairment individually, and valuation allowances against the capitalized costs are recorded based on the estimated economic chance of success and the length of time that Royale Energy expects to hold the properties. The valuation allowances are reviewed at least annually.F-10

F-9

Table of Contents

Significant unproved properties are assessed for impairment individually, and valuation allowances against the capitalized costs are recorded based on the estimated economic chance of success and the length of time that Royale Energy expects to hold the properties. The valuation allowances are reviewed at least annually.

A certain portion of the turnkey drilling participant’s funds received are non-refundable. The company holds all funds invested as Deferred Drilling Obligations until drilling is complete. Occasionally, drilling is delayed for various reasons such as weather, permitting, drilling rig availability and/or contractual obligations. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, Royale Energy had Deferred Drilling Obligations of $75,~~894~~891,~~001~~898 and $87,~~415~~894,~~528~~001, respectively.

If Royale Energy is unable to drill the wells, and a suitable replacement well is not found, Royale would retain the non-refundable portion of the contact and return the remaining funds to the participant. Included in cash and cash equivalents are amounts for use in completion of turnkey drilling programs in progress.

Losses on properties sold are recognized when incurred or when the properties are held for sale and the fair value of the properties is less than the carrying value.

Other Receivables

Our other receivables consists of receivables from direct working interest investors and industry partners. We provide for uncollectible accounts receivable using the allowance method of accounting for bad debts. Under this method of accounting, a provision for uncollectible accounts is charged directly to bad debt expense when it becomes probable the receivable will not be collected. The allowance account is increased or decreased based on past collection history and management’s evaluation of accounts receivable. All amounts considered uncollectible are charged against the allowance account and recoveries of previously charged off accounts are added to the allowance. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the Company established an allowance for uncollectable accounts of $21,~~270~~975,~~773~~660 and $2,270,773, respectively, for receivables from direct working interest investors whose expenses on non-producing wells were unlikely to be collected from revenue.

Revenue Receivables

Our revenue receivables consists of receivables related to the sale of our natural gas and oil. Once a production month is completed we receive payment approximately 15 to 30 days later.

F-1011

Table of Contents

Equipment and Fixtures

Equipment and fixtures are stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years, using the straight-line method. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in income. Maintenance and repairs, which neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life, are charged to expense as incurred. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment, other than oil and gas, are reflected in operations.

Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic and diluted losses per share are calculated as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
	For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
	Loss (Numerator)			Shares (Denominator)		Per-Share Amount
Basic Loss Per Share:
Net loss available to common stock	$	(42,~~144~~427,~~462~~169	)		1921,~~185~~836,~~896~~975	$	(0.2211	)
Loss Per Share:
Effect of dilutive securities and stock options					-	$	-
Net loss available to common stock	$	(42,~~144~~427,~~462~~169	)		1921,~~185~~836,~~896~~975	$	(0.2211	)

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
	For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
	Loss (Numerator)			Shares (Denominator)		Per-Share Amount
Basic Loss Per Share:
Net income available to common stock	$	(24,~~010~~144,~~816~~462	)		1519,~~194~~185,~~534~~896	$	(0.1322	)
Loss Per Share:
Effect of dilutive securities and stock options					-	$	-
Net loss available to common stock	$	(24,~~010~~144,~~816~~462	)		1519,~~194~~185,~~534~~896	$	(0.1322	)

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, Royale Energy had dilutive securities of 0 and 23,331, respectively. These securities were not included in the dilutive loss per share due to their antidilutive nature.

Stock Based Compensation

Royale Energy has a stock-based employee compensation plan, which is more fully described in Note 11. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the Compensation – Stock Compensation Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock-based awards.

Income Taxes

Royale utilizes the asset and liability approach to measure deferred tax assets and liabilities based on temporary differences existing at each balance sheet date using currently enacted tax rates in accordance with the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Under the Topic, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

F-1112

Table of Contents

The provision for income taxes is based on pretax financial accounting income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported net amounts.

Fair Value Measurements

According to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis in period subsequent to initial recognition, the reporting entity shall disclose information that enable users of its financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements and for recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, the effect of the measurements on earnings for the period.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value. Carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair values as of the balance sheet dates because of their generally short maturities.

The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Directly or indirectly observable inputs as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, Royale Energy does not have any financial assets measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company estimates asset retirement obligations pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 410, "“Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations"” ("“FASB ASC 410"”). The initial measurement of asset retirement obligations at fair value is calculated using discounted cash flow techniques and based on internal estimates of future retirement costs associated with oil and gas properties. Given the unobservable nature of the inputs, including plugging costs and reserve lives, the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation liability is deemed to use Level 3 inputs. See Note 3 for further discussion of the Company'’s asset retirement obligations.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the components of accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of $12,~~205~~392,~~740~~755 in trade accounts payable due to various vendors, $~~699~~688,~~068~~002 in payables and accruals related to direct working interest investors revenues and operating costs, $98483,~~172~~734 in accrued expenses related to current drilling efforts, $438,667 in legal settlement payables related to Cash Advances on Pending Transactions, $266,110 for accrued liabilities for amounts set aside mainly for the plugging and abandonment of certain wells, $~~103~~93,~~212~~619 for employee related taxes and accruals, $65223,833 related to interest payable on cash advances ~~from~~on ~~investors~~pending transactions, $35,036 in deferred rent and $1817,~~662~~123 in federal and state income taxes payable. At December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the components of accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of $21,~~167~~205,~~809~~740 in trade accounts payable due to various vendors, $~~238~~699,~~320~~068 in payables and accruals related to direct working interest investors revenues and operating costs, $~~369~~98,~~837~~172 in accrued expenses related to current drilling efforts, $266,110 for accrued liabilities for amounts set aside mainly for the plugging and abandonment of certain wells, $~~140~~103,~~798~~212 for employee related taxes and accruals, $65,833 related to interest payable on cash advances on pending transactions, $12,446 in deferred rent and $2018,~~462~~662 in federal and state income taxes payable.

F-1213

Table of Contents

Cash Advances on Pending Transactions

In July 2016, ~~Royale~~we ~~entered~~received ~~into~~a ~~negotiations~~cash ~~for~~investment ~~certain~~of ~~equity~~$1,580,000 ~~and~~from ~~debt~~two ~~financing~~investors ~~transactions~~to purchase convertible promissory notes of $1,280,000 ~~described~~and ~~below~~$300,000, with a conversion price of $0.40 per share, with warrants to purchase one share of common stock for every three shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes. The funds from these transactions iswere ~~to be~~ used to continue drilling activities, fund expenses ~~to be~~ incurred in connection with the completion of Royale Energy’s ~~proposed~~ merger with Matrix Oil Corporation and for general corporate purposes. AtThe ~~December~~notes 31originally matured on August 2, ~~2016~~2017, one year from the ~~paperwork~~date ~~for~~of ~~these~~issuance, ~~transactions~~and ~~had~~carried ~~not~~a ~~been~~10% ~~finalized~~interest rate, with a default rate of 25%. Shortly before completion of the Merger, the $300,000 note was converted into 750,000 shares of Royale common stock, and asRoyale ~~such~~agreed ~~have~~to ~~been~~a ~~included~~cash assettlement ~~Cash~~with ~~Advances~~the ~~from~~holder ~~Investors:~~of the $1,280,000 note for $1,900,000.

The Company entered in negotiations with two separate investors for convertible promissory notes of $1,280,000 and $300,000, with a conversion price of $0.40 per share, with warrants to purchase one share of common stock for every three shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes. The notes mature one year from the date of issuance and carry a 10% interest rate, which is due at maturity. The conversion of the notes to shares is subject to shareholder approval.

Reclassifications

Certain items in the financial statements have been reclassified to maintain consistency and comparability for all periods presented herein.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has reviewed the updates issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) during the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

ASU 2017-09: Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Scope of Modification Accounting - In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment awarded require an entity to apply modification accounting. ASU 2017-09 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 are to be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date, consequently the impact will be dependent on the modification of any share-based payment awards and the nature of such modifications. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-09 on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2017-01: Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Clarifying the Definition of a Business - In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-01. The objective of ASU 2017-01 is to clarify the definition of a business by adding guidance on how entities should evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods in the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company is in the process of determining the impact that the implementation of ASU 2017-01 will have on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2016-09: Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting -

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09 which amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. If early adopted, an entity must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The adoption of this guidance has no impact on our results of operations or cash flows.

ASU 2015-17: Income Taxes (Topic740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes – In November 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-17 which eliminates the requirement to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent amounts in a classified balance sheet. The new standard requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent. The amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period and may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. In 2016, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-17 and has classified all of its deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on its balance sheet. The adoption of this guidance has no impact on our results of operations or cash flows.

~~ASU 2016~~F-01: Financial Instruments – Overall – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10) In January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-01 which requires an entity to: (i) measure equity investments at fair value through net income, with certain exceptions; (ii) present in Other Comprehensive Income the changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured using the fair value option; (iii) present financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset; (iv) calculate the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes based on an exit price and; (v) assess a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses of AFS debt securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. The Update provides an election to subsequently measure certain nonmarketable equity investments at cost less any impairment and adjusted for certain observable price changes. The Update also requires a qualitative impairment assessment of such equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. The new standard becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is only permitted for the provision related to instrument-specific credit risk and the fair value disclosure exemption provided to nonpublic entities. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting ASU 2016-01 on its consolidated financial statements but the adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 14

ASU No. 2016-02: Leases (Topic 842). In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02 which aims to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requiring disclosure of key information about leasing agreements. Entities are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements but the adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2016-09: Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share- Based Payment Accounting. In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09 which amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. If early adopted, an entity must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on the Company’s financial statements.

F-13

Table of Contents

ASU 2016-1301: Financial Instruments – ~~Credit~~Overall ~~Losses~~– ~~(Topic~~Recognition ~~326):~~and Measurement of ~~Credit~~Financial ~~Losses~~Assets onand Financial ~~Instruments.~~Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10) In ~~June~~January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-1301 which ~~was~~requires ~~issued~~an entity to: ~~provide~~(i) ~~more~~measure ~~decision-useful~~equity ~~information~~investments ~~about~~at ~~the~~fair ~~expected~~value ~~credit~~through ~~losses~~net onincome, ~~financial~~with ~~instruments~~certain ~~and~~exceptions; ~~changes~~(ii) ~~the~~present ~~loss~~in ~~impairment~~Other ~~methodology.~~Comprehensive ToIncome ~~achieve~~the ~~this~~changes ~~objective,~~in ~~the~~instrument-specific ~~amendments~~credit inrisk ~~ASU~~for ~~2016-13~~financial ~~replace~~liabilities ~~the~~measured ~~incurred~~using ~~loss~~the ~~impairment~~fair ~~methodology~~value inoption; ~~current~~(iii) ~~GAAP~~present ~~with~~financial aassets ~~methodology~~and ~~that~~financial ~~reflects~~liabilities ~~expected~~by ~~credit~~measurement ~~losses~~category and ~~requires~~form ~~consideration~~ of afinancial ~~broader~~asset; ~~range~~(iv) calculate the fair value of ~~reasonable~~financial ~~and~~instruments ~~supportable~~for ~~information~~disclosure topurposes ~~inform~~based ~~credit~~on ~~loss~~an ~~estimates.~~exit ~~The~~price ~~amendments~~and; ~~affect~~(v) ~~entities~~assess ~~holding~~a ~~financial~~valuation ~~assets~~allowance ~~and~~on ~~net~~deferred ~~investment~~tax inassets ~~leases~~related ~~that~~to ~~are~~unrealized ~~not~~losses ~~accounted~~of ~~for~~AFS atdebt ~~fair~~securities ~~value~~in ~~through~~combination ~~net~~with ~~income~~other deferred tax assets. The ~~amendments~~Update ~~affect~~provides ~~loans,~~an ~~debt~~election ~~securities,~~to ~~trade~~subsequently ~~receivables,~~measure ~~net~~certain ~~investments~~nonmarketable inequity ~~leases,~~investments ~~off-balance-sheet~~at ~~credit~~cost ~~exposures,~~less ~~reinsurance~~any ~~receivables,~~impairment and ~~any~~adjusted ~~other~~for ~~financial~~certain ~~assets~~observable ~~not~~price ~~excluded~~changes. ~~from~~The ~~the~~Update ~~scope~~also ~~that~~requires ~~have~~a ~~the~~qualitative ~~contractual~~impairment ~~right~~assessment toof ~~receive~~such ~~cash~~equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. ~~This~~ ~~pronouncement~~The isnew standard becomes effective for ~~reporting~~fiscal ~~periods~~years beginning after December 15, ~~2019~~2017. ~~using~~Early ~~a modified retrospective~~ adoption ~~method.~~is Aonly ~~prospective~~permitted ~~transition~~for ~~approach~~the isprovision ~~required~~related ~~for~~to ~~debt~~instrument-specific ~~securities~~credit ~~for~~risk ~~which~~and anthe ~~other-than-temporary~~fair ~~impairment~~value ~~had~~disclosure ~~been~~exemption ~~recognized~~provided ~~before~~to ~~the~~nonpublic ~~effective date~~entities. The Company is currently evaluating the ~~impact~~effects of adopting ASU 2016-01 on its consolidated financial statements but the adoption ofis ~~ASU~~not ~~2016-13~~expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2016-1502: ~~Statement~~Leases ~~of Cash Flows~~ (Topic ~~230~~842)~~: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments~~. In ~~August~~February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-1502 which ~~addresses~~aims ~~several~~to ~~specific~~increase ~~cash~~transparency ~~flow~~and ~~issues~~comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requiring disclosure of key information about leasing agreements. Entities are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. ASU 2016-1502 is effective for ~~annual~~fiscal ~~and~~years ~~interim periods~~ beginning ~~January~~after 1December 15, 2018, ~~with~~including ~~early~~interim ~~adoption~~periods ~~permitted,~~within ~~and~~those ~~requires~~fiscal ~~full~~years. ~~retrospective~~Early ~~application~~adoption onis ~~adoption~~permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting ASU 2016-1502 on its consolidated financial statements, but the adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2014-15: Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) - Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The Company adopted ASU 2014-15 as of December 31, 2016. This ASU requires management to assess a company's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related disclosures in certain circumstances.

NOTE 2 - OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES, EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES

Oil and gas properties, equipment and fixtures consist of the following at December 31:

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Oil and Gas
Producing properties, including intangible drilling costs	$	3,755,705		$	53,~~217~~755,~~637~~705
Undeveloped properties		~~307~~1,~~158~~435			2307,~~381,564~~158
Lease and well equipment		4,~~128~~119,~~178~~802			4,~~339~~128,~~122~~178
		8,191,041			11,938,323
		7,876,942			8,191,041
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization		(6,~~468~~582,~~279~~648	)		(76,~~656~~468,~~731~~279	)
	$	1,~~722~~294,~~762~~294		$	41,~~281~~722,~~592~~762

Commercial and Other	~~2016~~2017			~~2015~~2016
Real estate, including furniture and fixtures	$	-		$	~~2,266,050~~-
Vehicles		40,061			~~118~~40,061
Furniture and equipment		1,~~089~~092,~~648~~926			1,~~120~~089,~~760~~648
		1,129,709			3,504,871
		1,132,987			1,129,709
Accumulated depreciation		(1,~~119~~125,~~047~~039	)		(1,~~253~~119,~~985~~047	)
		10,662			2,250,886
		7,948			10,662
	$	1,~~733~~302,~~424~~242		$	61,~~532~~733,~~478~~424

F-1415

Table of Contents

The following sets forth costs incurred for oil and gas property acquisition and development activities, whether capitalized or expensed:

	2016		2015
	2017		2016
Acquisition - Proved	$	-		~~69,446~~-
Acquisition- Unproved	$	-		~~113,749~~-
Development	$	14,~~210~~525,~~261~~452		~~672~~1,~~651~~210,261
Exploration	$	~~2,603,209~~-		12,~~845~~603,~~585~~209

The guidance set forth in the Continued Capitalization of Exploratory Well Costs paragraph of the Extractive Activities Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification requires that we evaluate all existing capitalized exploratory well costs and disclose the extent to which any such capitalized costs have become impaired and are expensed or reclassified during a fiscal period. We did not make any additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending a determination of proved reserves during ~~2016~~2017 or ~~2015~~2016. We did not charge any previously capitalized exploratory well costs to expense upon adoption of Topic. Undeveloped properties are not subject to depletion, depreciation or amortization.

	12 Months Ended December 31,
	2016		2015
	2017		2016
Beginning balance at January 1	$	-	$	-
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending the determination of proved reserves	$	-	$	~~85,640~~-
Reclassifications to wells, facilities, and equipment based on the determination of proved reserves	$	-	$	~~(85,640~~-	)
Ending balance at December 31	$	-	$	-

Results of Operations from Oil and Gas Producing and Exploration Activities

The results of operations from oil and gas producing and exploration activities (excluding corporate overhead and interest costs) for the two years ended December 31, are as follows:

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Oil and gas sales	$	~~538~~554,~~631~~235			1538,~~018,928~~631
Production related costs		(~~594~~435,~~241~~637	)		(1594,~~449,082~~241	)
Lease Impairment		(2289,~~071,849~~775	)		(~~424~~2,~~163~~071,849	)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		(~~283~~116,~~874~~017	)		(~~400~~283,~~813~~874	)
Results of operations from producing and exploration activities	$	(2287,~~411,333~~194	)		(12,~~255~~411,~~130~~333	)
Income Taxes (Benefit)		-			-
Net Results	$	(2287,~~411,333~~194	)		(12,~~255~~411,~~130~~333	)

F-1516

Table of Contents

NOTE 3 - ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

The Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification requires that an asset retirement obligation (ARO) associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period in which it is incurred or becomes determinable (as defined by the standard), with an associated increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The cost of the tangible asset, including the initially recognized asset retirement cost, is depreciated over the useful life of the asset. The ARO is recorded at fair value, and accretion expense will be recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO is measured using expected future cash outflows discounted at the Company’s credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate. The provisions of this Topic apply to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, development, and operation of a long-lived asset.

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Asset retirement obligation, Beginning of the year	$	1952,~~096,179~~110		$	~~804~~1,~~206~~096,179
Liabilities incurred during the period		9053,~~000~~142			~~321~~90,~~560~~000
Settlements		~~(10,498~~-	)		(6810,~~360~~498	)
Sales		~~(229,465~~-	)		-(229,465	)
Accretion expense		5(4,~~894~~344	)		385,~~773~~894
Asset retirement obligation, End of year	$	~~952~~1,~~110~~000,908		$	1952,~~096,179~~110

NOTE 4 - TURNKEY DRILLING OBLIGATION

Royale Energy receives funds under turnkey drilling contracts, which require Royale Energy to drill oil and gas wells within a reasonable time period from the date of receipt of the funds. As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, Royale Energy had recorded deferred turnkey drilling associated with undrilled wells of $75,~~894~~891,~~001~~898 and $87,~~415~~894,~~528~~001, respectively, as a current liability.

NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT

	2016		2015
	2017		2016
On December 24, 2013, Royale Energy, Inc. entered into an agreement between the Company, as buyer, and North Island Financial Credit Union as seller, for the purchase of commercial property in San Diego, California, for a purchase price of $2,000,000, of which $500,000 was paid in cash on the date of purchase, and $1,500,000 was borrowed from AmericanWest Bank, NA, with a note secured by the property being purchased. The note carries an interest rate of 5.75% until paid in full. Royale will pay this loan in 119 regular payments of $9,525 each and one balloon payment estimated at $1,150,435. Royale’s first payment was due February 1, 2014, and all subsequent payments are due on the same day of each month after that. Royale’s final payment will be due on January 1, 2024, and will be for all principal and all accrued interest not yet paid. Payments include principal and interest. Stephen M Hosmer, President, CFO is named as a personal guarantor of the loan. The loan agreement contains certain covenants that, among other things, Royale must maintain a ratio of EBITDA-Debt Service Coverage in excess of 1.50 to 1.00. At December 31, 2015, Royale was not in compliance with this covenant, but obtained a forbearance from the bank from terms of that covenant to May 26, 2016. In June 2016, the sale of the building was completed and the related principal and interest payments were paid in full.	$	-	$	1,446,853
	$	-	$	-
Total Long Term Debt	$	-	$	~~1,446,853~~-
Less Current Maturity		-	$	~~30,528~~-
Long Term Debt Less Current Portion	$	-	$	~~1,416,325~~-

F-16

Table of Contents

NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES

Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and amounts used for income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. In 2016, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-17 and has classified all of its deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on its balance sheet.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred assets and liabilities at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are as follows:

	2016			2015
Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities):
Statutory Depletion Carry Forward	$	474,250		$	555,093
Net Operating Loss		5,392,208			4,651,428
Other		1,255,372			1,247,829
Share-Based Compensation		104,388			96,536
Capital Loss / AMT Credit Carry Forward		18,915			18,915
Charitable Contributions Carry Forward		13,102			21,644
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts		886,056			887,418
Oil and Gas Properties and Fixed Assets		5,922,031			4,980,324
	$	14,066,322		$	12,459,187
Valuation Allowance		(14,066,322	)		(12,459,187	)
Net Deferred Tax Asset	$	-		$	-

At the end of 2015, management reviewed the realizability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets. Due to the Company’s cumulative losses in recent years, Royale and its management concluded that it is not “more-likely-than-not” its deferred tax assets will be realized. As a result, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets in 2015. At the end of 2016, management reviewed the reliability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets, and due to the Company’s continued cumulative losses in recent years, Royale and its management concluded it is not “more-likely-than-not” its deferred tax assets will be realized. As a result, the Company will continue to record a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets in 2016. The Company will assess the realizability of the deferred tax assets at least yearly and make appropriate updates as needed. The Company had statutory percentage depletion carry forwards of approximately $1.2 million at December 31, 2016. The depletion has no expiration date. The Company also has a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $13.5 million at December 31, 2016, which will begin to expire in 2027.

A reconciliation of Royale Energy's provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rates at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to pretax income is as follows:

	2016			2015
Tax (benefit) computed at statutory rate of 34%	$	(1,400,617	)	$	(683,678	)
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
State tax / percentage depletion / other		937			957
Other non-deductible expenses		624			1,478
Change in valuation allowance		1,399,056			681,243
Provision (benefit)	$	-		$	-

F-17

Table of Contents

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted significant changes to U.S. tax law following the passage and signing of H.R.1, “An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018 (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act permanently reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from a maximum 35% to 21%, eliminated corporate Alternative Minimum Tax, modified rules for expensing capital investment, and limits the deduction of interest expense for certain companies. Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 740 requires filers to record the effect of tax law changes in the period enacted. However, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), that permits filers to record provisional amounts during a measurement period ending no later than one year from the date of enactment. For the period ending December 31, 2017, the Company re-measured the applicable deferred tax assets based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse. The gross deferred tax assets and liabilities have been adjusted and a corresponding offset has been recorded to the full valuation allowance against the Company’s net deferred tax assets, which resulted in no net effect to its provision for income taxes and effective tax rate. No other provisional adjustments have been made as a result of the Act.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are as follows:

	2017			2016
Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities):
Statutory Depletion Carry Forward	$	369,591		$	474,250
Net Operating Loss		3,130,841			5,392,208
Other		1,013,329			1,255,372
Share-Based Compensation		69,609			104,388
Capital Loss / AMT Credit Carry Forward		18,915			18,915
Charitable Contributions Carry Forward		10,025			13,102
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts		514,067			886,056
Oil and Gas Properties and Fixed Assets		4,839,823			5,922,031
	$	9,966,200		$	14,066,322
Valuation Allowance		(9,966,200	)		(14,066,322	)
Net Deferred Tax Asset	$	-		$	-

At the end of 2016, management reviewed the realizability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets. Due to the Company’s cumulative losses in recent years, Royale and its management concluded that it is not “more-likely-than-not” its deferred tax assets will be realized. As a result, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets in 2016. At the end of 2017, management reviewed the reliability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets, and due to the Company’s continued cumulative losses in recent years, Royale and its management concluded it is not “more-likely-than-not” its deferred tax assets will be realized. As a result, the Company will continue to record a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets in 2017. The Company will assess the realizability of the deferred tax assets at least yearly and make appropriate updates as needed. The Company had statutory percentage depletion carry forwards of approximately $1.4 million at December 31, 2017. The depletion has no expiration date. The Company also has a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $12.0 million at December 31, 2017, which will begin to expire in 2027.

A reconciliation of Royale Energy’s provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rates at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, to pretax income is as follows:

	2017			2016

Tax (benefit) computed at statutory rate of 34%	$	(825,237	)	$	(1,400,617	)

Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:

State tax / percentage depletion / other		990			937
Other non-deductible expenses		403			624
Change in valuation allowance		823,844			1,399,056
Provision (benefit)	$	-		$	-

F-18

Table of Contents

The components of the Company’s tax provision are as follows:

	2016		2015
	2017		2016
Current tax provision (benefit) – federal	$	-		-
Current tax provision (benefit) – state		-		-
Deferred tax provision (benefit) – federal		-		-
Deferred tax provision (benefit) – state		-		-
Total provision (benefit)	$	-		-

In January 2007, Royale adopted additional provisions from the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. As a result of our implementation of the Topic at the time of adoption and at December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company did not recognize a liability for uncertain tax positions. Currently, the only differences between our financial statements and our income tax returns relate to normal timing differences such as depreciation, depletion and amortization, which are recorded as deferred taxes on our balance sheets. We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months. The tax years ~~2011~~2012 through ~~2015~~2016 remain open to examination by the taxing jurisdictions in which we file income tax returns.

NOTE 7 - SERIES AA PREFERRED STOCK

In April 1992, Royale Energy'’s Board of Directors authorized the sale of 147,500 shares of Series AA Convertible Preferred Stock. The resolution authorizing the Series AA Convertible Preferred Stock provided for a stated value of $4 per share. The Series AA Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the security holder at the rate of one share of common stock for two shares of Series AA Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series AA Preferred Stock has never been registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and no market exists for the shares. No shares of Series AA Preferred Stock have been issued since the original shares were issued in 1992.

As of September 30, 2016, Royale Energy’s transfer records reflected that certificates representing 46,662 shares of Series AA Preferred stock remained outstanding, but Royale Energy has lost contact with the registered holders of the Series AA Preferred Stock and does not have a means to communicate with them concerning the status of their shares.

In November 2016, Royale entered into a securities purchase agreement with one vendor for the settlement an outstanding accounts payable of $25,000. Under the terms of the agreement, Royale issued 76,923 shares of its Series AA convertible preferred stock at $0.325 per share. On the basis of a resolution by the Board of Directors’, these Series AA shares were immediately converted to common stock on a one to one basis.

In late 2016, Royale Energy learned that the records of the Secretary of State of California do not reflect that a certificate of determination, amendment to the company’s articles of incorporation, or any other document had ever been filed with the Secretary of State authorizing the issuance of the Series AA Preferred Stock. Royale Energy has reserved 23,331 shares of its common stock (the amount of common stock into which the Series AA Preferred shares would be convertible) for issuance to holders of the outstanding certificates for Series AA Preferred Stock at such time as Royale Energy is able to make contact with the Series AA Preferred shareholders.

NOTE 8 - COMMON STOCK

In April 2016, Royale entered in a securities purchase agreement and related agreements with one investor. Under the terms of the agreement, the investor purchased 622,316 shares of Royale’s common stock at $0.3214 per share, and received warrants to purchase up to 311,158 shares (the “Warrants’) of stock at $0.5356 per share for three (3) years, for a total of $200,000 in gross proceeds. In July 2016, Royale entered in securities purchase agreements and related agreements with three investors. Under the terms of the agreement, the investors purchased 2,392,500 shares of Royale’s common stock at $0.40 per share, and received warrants to purchase up to 478,500 shares (the “Warrants’) of stock at $0.80 per share for two (2) years, for a total of $957,000 in gross proceeds.

F-1819

Table of Contents

InOn ~~May~~November ~~2015~~25, ~~and April 2014~~2015, Royale Energy entered into ~~Sales~~a ~~Agreements~~securities purchase agreement and related agreements with ~~Roth~~a ~~Capital~~group ~~Partners,~~of ~~LLC~~individual ~~(Roth),~~investors ~~under~~pursuant ~~which~~to a registered direct offering. Under the ~~Company~~terms ~~had~~of the ~~ability~~agreements, tothe ~~issue~~investors ~~and~~purchased ~~sell~~497,948 shares of ~~its~~Royale’s common stock ~~from~~at ~~time~~$0.408 per share, and received warrants to ~~time~~purchase inup anto at248,973 shares (the ~~market~~“Warrants’) ~~equity~~of ~~offering~~stock ~~program~~at ~~with~~$1.00 ~~Roth~~per ~~acting~~share asfor three (3) years, for a total of $203,165 in gross proceeds, Each Warrant becomes exercisable one year from the ~~Company’s~~date ~~sales~~of ~~agent~~issuance. ~~Royale~~Each ~~Energy~~Warrant ~~sold~~contains ~~701~~customary adjustments for corporate events such as reorganizations,~~397~~ ~~shares~~splits, and dividends. The fair value of ~~common~~each ~~stock~~warrant was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model incorporates certain assumptions for ~~total~~inputs ~~consideration~~including ofa ~~$556~~risk-free market interest rate,~~123~~ ~~under~~expected dividend yield of the ~~2015~~underlying ~~Sales~~common ~~Agreement~~stock, expected warrant life and noexpected ~~shares~~volatility in the market value of the underlying common stock. For ~~under~~these warrants, the ~~2014~~value ~~Sales~~was ~~Agreement~~calculated with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 78. ~~Both~~96%, ~~agreements~~risk-free ~~have~~market ~~been~~interest ~~terminated~~rate asof 1.13%, an expected term of ~~December~~1,460 31days, ~~2015~~and an exercise price of $1.00.

On November 25, 2015, Royale Energy entered into a securities purchase agreement and related agreements with a group of individual investors pursuant to a registered direct offering. Under the terms of the agreements, the investors purchased 497,948 shares of Royale’s common stock at $0.408 per share, and received warrants to purchase up to 248,973 shares (the “Warrants’) of stock at $1.00 per share for three (3) years, for a total of $203,165 in gross proceeds,. Each Warrant becomes exercisable one year from the date of issuance. Each Warrant contains customary adjustments for corporate events such as reorganizations, splits, and dividends. The fair value of each warrant was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model incorporates certain assumptions for inputs including a risk-free market interest rate, expected dividend yield of the underlying common stock, expected warrant life and expected volatility in the market value of the underlying common stock. For these warrants, the value was calculated with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 78.96%, risk-free market interest rate of 1.13%, an expected term of 1,460 days, and an exercise price of $1.00.

NOTE 9 - OPERATING LEASES

Royale Energy occupies office space through the use of two leases, one for their office in El Cajon, CA and one for an office and yard in Woodland, CA. The El Cajon lease is under a 62 month lease contract, with a yearly increase of 3.5%, which expires in January 2020. The El Cajon lease calls for monthly payments ranging from $6,148 to $10,801, and the Woodland lease calls for monthly payments of $500. Royale rents an office and yard in Woodland, CA on a month-to-month basis that currently calls for monthly payments of $500. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 was $63110,~~733~~909 and $1063,~~400~~733 respectively.

Year Ended
December 31,
2017	$	97,266
2018	$	119,286
2019	$	123,251
2020	$	127,355
2021	$	131,602
Thereafter	$	13,802
2022	$	13,802
Total	$	~~612~~515,~~562~~296

NOTE 10 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Significant Ownership Interests

Harry E. Hosmer, Royale Energy’s chairman of the board of directors, is the father of Royale Energy executives Donald H. Hosmer, president of business development and director; and Stephen M. Hosmer, chief financial officer and director.

As of ~~March~~February 2027, ~~2017~~2018, Donald H. Hosmer owned 6.8475% of Royale Energy common stock (as calculated under SEC Rule 13d-3). Donald Hosmer has participated individually in 179 wells under the 1989 policy. During ~~2016~~2017, Donald ~~participated~~did not participate in fractional interests ~~of one well in the amount of $1,556~~ and in ~~2015~~2016 participated in fractional interests of ~~two~~one ~~wells~~well in the amount of $31,~~143~~556. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, Royale had a ~~receivable~~payable balance of $~~2,318~~340 due ~~from~~to Donald Hosmer for normal drilling and lease operating expenses.

As of ~~March~~February 2027, ~~2017~~2018, Stephen M. Hosmer owned 6.3132% of Royale Energy common stock (as calculated under SEC Rule 13d-3). Stephen Hosmer has participated individually in 179 wells under the 1989 policy. During ~~2016~~2017, Stephen ~~participated~~did not participate in fractional interests ~~of one well in the amount of $1,556~~ and in ~~2015~~2016 participated in fractional interests of ~~four~~one ~~wells~~well in the amount of $41,~~389~~556. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, Royale had a receivable balance of $1211,~~912~~817 due from Stephen Hosmer for normal drilling and lease operating expenses.

FAs of February 27, 2018, Harry E. Hosmer owned 7.09% of Royale Energy common stock (as calculated under SEC Rule 13d-193). During 2017, Harry Hosmer did not participate in fractional interests and in 2016 participated in fractional interests of one well in the amount of $1,556. At December 31, 2017, Royale had a receivable balance of $3,999 due from Harry Hosmer for normal drilling and lease operating expenses.

Table of Contents

As of March 20, 2017, Harry E. Hosmer owned 7.18% of Royale Energy common stock (as calculated under SEC Rule 13d-3). During 2016, Harry Hosmer participated in fractional interests of one well in the amount of $1,556 and in 2015 participated in fractional interests of four wells in the amount of $5,633. At December 31, 2016, Royale had a receivable balance of $6,459 due from Harry Hosmer for normal drilling and lease operating expenses.

NOTE 11 - STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

A summary of the status of Royale Energy's stock option plan as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:

	2016				2015
			Weighted-					Weighted-
			Average					Average
			Exercise					Exercise
	Shares		Price		Shares			Price
Options
Outstanding and Exercisable at Beginning of Year		100,000	$	5.00		281,308		$	3.25
Granted or Vested		-		-		100,000			5.00
Exercised		-		-		-			-
Forfeited		-		-		(281,308	)		-
Options Outstanding and Exercisable at Year End		100,000	$	5.00		100,000		$	5.00
Weighted-average Fair Value of Options Granted During the Year	$	-			$	-

At December 31, 2016, Royale Energy’s stock price, $0.62, was less than the weighted average exercise price, and as such the outstanding and exercisable stock options had no intrinsic value. The remaining outstanding stock options have a weighted-average remaining contractual term of one year as of December 31, 2016. There were no stock options granted during 2016.

A summary of the status of Royale Energy's non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:

	2016				2015
			Weighted-				Weighted-
			Average				Average
			Grant-Date				Grant-Date
	Shares		Fair Value		Shares		Fair Value
Non-vested Stock Options
Non-vested at Beginning of Year		-	$	-		105,000	$	0.97
Granted		-		-		-		-
Reinstated		-		-		-		-
Vested		-		-		90,000		0.97
Expired or Forfeited		-		-		15,000		0.97
Non-vested at End of Year		-	$	-		-	$	-

During 2016 and 2015, we recognized $0 and $86,877, respectively, in compensation costs for the vested stock options. The company will incur no future expense related to these options.

F-20

Table of Contents

NOTE 11 - STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

A summary of the status of Royale Energy’s stock option plan as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:

	2017					2016
				Weighted-				Weighted-
				Average				Average
				Exercise				Exercise
	Shares			Price		Shares		Price

Options
Outstanding and Exercisable at Beginning of Year		100,000		$	5.00		100,000	$	5.00
Granted or Vested		-			-		-		-
Exercised		-			-		-		-
Forfeited		(100,000	)		-		-		-

Options Outstanding and Exercisable at Year End		-		$	-		100,000	$	5.00

Weighted-average Fair Value of Options Granted During the Year		-					-

A summary of the status of Royale Energy’s non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:

	2017				2016
			Weighted-				Weighted-
			Average				Average
			Grant-Date				Grant-Date
	Shares		Fair Value		Shares		Fair Value

Non-vested Stock Options
Non-vested at Beginning of Year		-	$	-		-	$	-
Granted		-		-		-		-
Reinstated		-		-		-		-
Vested		-		-		-		-
Expired or Forfeited		-		-		-		-

Non-vested at End of Year		-	$	-		-	$	-

During 2017 and 2016, we recognized $0 and $0, respectively, in compensation costs for the vested stock options. The company will incur no future expense related to these options.

NOTE 12 - SIMPLE IRA PLAN

In April 1998, the Company established a Simple IRA pension plan covering all employees. The Company will contribute a matching contribution to each eligible employee’s Simple IRA equal to the employee’s salary reduction contributions up to a limit of 3% of the employee’s compensation for the year. The employer contribution for the years ending December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, were $2928,~~011,~~967 and $4329,~~001~~011 respectively.

F-21

Table of Contents

NOTE 13 - ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Royale Energy has established procedures for the continuing evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and assure compliance with regulatory policies and procedures. Management monitors these laws and regulations and periodically assesses the propriety of its operational and accounting policies related to environmental issues. The nature of Royale Energy'’s business requires routine day-to-day compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Royale Energy incurred no material environmental investigation, compliance and remediation costs in ~~2016~~2017 or ~~2015~~2016.

Royale Energy is unable to predict whether its future operations will be materially affected by these laws and regulations. It is believed that legislation and regulations relating to environmental protection will not materially affect the results of operations of Royale Energy.

NOTE 14 - CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

The Company bids its gas sales on a month to month basis and generally sells to a single customer without commitment to future gas sales to any particular customer. The Company normally sells approximately 6932% of its monthly natural gas production to one customer on a month to month basis. Since we are able to sell our natural gas to other readily available customers, the loss of any one customer would not have an adverse effect on our overall sales operations.

The Company maintains cash in depository institutions that are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000 per institution for our interest bearing accounts in the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, and ~~2015~~2016. At December 31, 2016, and 2015, the Company’s non-interest bearing accounts were fully insured by the FDIC. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, cash in banks exceeded the FDIC limits by approximately $42.58 million and $3.4.5 million, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses on deposits.

NOTE 15 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company may become involved from time to time in litigation on various matters, which are routine to the conduct of its business. The Company believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations, though any adverse decision in these cases or the costs of defending or settling such claims could have a material effect on its business.

NOTE 16 - CHANGE IN ESTIMATE

During the year 2016, the Company changed the process by which it analyzed the collectability of its other receivables, mainly from direct working interest investors. See Note 1, Other Receivables. Prior to 2016, the Company estimated the collectability of its receivables on a well by well basis, based on its reserve report furnished by the Company’s independent petroleum engineers. The reserve report provided an estimate of future revenues to be recovered from existing wells which was then compared to the receivables from those wells. An allowance for doubtful accounts was established if the receivables exceeded the future revenues. In 2016, the Company applied its reserve report values proportionally to its direct working interest investors to determine the potentially uncollectable amount on a per investor basis.

NOTE 17 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On ~~November~~August 302, 2016, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~two anunsecured ~~Agreement~~convertible ~~and~~promissory ~~Plan~~notes offor ~~Merger~~a ~~and~~total ~~Reorganization~~principal ~~(the~~amount ~~“Merger~~of ~~Agreement”)~~$1,580,000 ~~among~~to ~~the~~two ~~Company,~~investors. See ~~Royale~~Capital ~~Energy~~Resources ~~Holdings,~~and ~~Inc.~~Liquidity, ~~Royale~~page ~~Merger~~12. On ~~Sub~~August 2, ~~Inc.~~2017, the notes became due and ~~Matrix~~payable ~~Merger~~and ~~Sub~~remained due and payable on December 31, ~~Inc~~2017. On February 28, ~~and~~2018, ~~Matrix~~one ~~Oil~~of ~~Management~~the ~~Corporation The~~notes, ~~Merger~~for ~~Agreement~~$300,000, was ~~subsequently~~converted ~~amended~~to ~~and~~750,000 ~~restated~~shares asof common stock immediately prior to the Merger (a conversion price of ~~December~~$0.40 ~~31,~~per ~~2016~~share). ~~The~~Also ~~amended~~on ~~and~~February ~~restated~~28, ~~Merger~~2018, ~~Agreement~~Royale ~~provided~~reached ~~that~~a itsettlement ~~may~~of bea ~~terminated~~dispute bywith the ~~Company~~second orinvestor ~~Matrix~~regarding ~~Oil~~his ~~Management~~advance ~~Corporation~~of if$1.28 million. In the settlement, Royale has agreed to pay $1.9 million to the investor, who in turn did not ~~consummated~~receive onshares orof ~~before~~the anCompany’s ~~outside~~common ~~termination~~stock ~~date~~on conversion of ~~March~~this investment. At December 31, 2017~~. On~~, ~~March~~Legal 30and Accounting expense includes a $438,667 ~~2017~~litigation settlement, the ~~parties~~difference ~~agreed~~between tothe ~~extend~~$1.9 million settlement and the ~~outside~~original ~~termination~~note ~~date~~of $1.28 million and accrued interest of $181,333. In the ~~Merger~~settlement, ~~Agreement~~Royale ~~until~~also ~~June~~cancelled 30a two year warrant issued to the second investor to purchase 1,066,667 ~~2017~~of Royale common stock at $0.80 per share.

~~F-21~~On March 7, 2018, New Royale, Royale, and Matrix and its affiliates were notified by the California Secretary of State of the filing and acceptance of agreements of merger by the California Secretary of State, to complete the previously announced merger between the companies (the “Merger”), as described in Item 1 – Description of Business – Merger with Matrix Oil Management Corporation.

F-22

Table of Contents

NOTE 18 - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ABOUT OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

The following estimates of proved oil and gas reserves, both developed and undeveloped, represent interests owned by Royale Energy which are located solely in the United States. Proved reserves represent estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate to be reasonably certain to be recoverable in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells, with existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells for which relatively major expenditures are required for completion.

Disclosures of oil and gas reserves, which follow, are based on estimates prepared by independent petroleum engineering consultant Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., the net reserve value of its proved developed and undeveloped reserves was approximately $3.0 million at December 31, 2016, based on the average PG&E city-gate natural gas price spot price of $2.76 per MCF and for oil volumes, the average West Texas Intermediate price of $39.25 per barrel as applied on a field-by-field basis. Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. provided reserve value information for the Company’s California, Texas, Oklahoma, Utah and Louisiana properties. Such estimates are subject to numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proved reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. These estimates do not include probable or possible reserves.

The technical persons responsible for preparing the reserves estimates presented in the report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., meet the requirements regarding qualifications, independence, objectivity, and confidentiality set forth in the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. is a firm of independent petroleum engineers, geologists, geophysicists, and petrophysicists; and do not own an interest in our properties and are not employed on a contingent basis. All activities and reports performed and completed by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. with regards to our reserve valuation estimates are reviewed Royale’s management.

These estimates are furnished and calculated in accordance with requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Because of unpredictable variances in expenses and capital forecasts, crude oil and natural gas price changes, largely influenced and controlled by U.S. and foreign government actions, and the fact that the bases for such estimates vary significantly, management believes the usefulness of these projections is limited. Estimates of future net cash flows presented do not represent management'’s assessment of future profitability or future cash flows to Royale Energy. Management'’s investment and operating decisions are based upon reserve estimates that include proved reserves prescribed by the SEC as well as probable reserves, and upon different price and cost assumptions from those used here.

It should be recognized that applying current costs and prices and a 10 percent standard discount rate does not convey absolute value. The discounted amounts arrived at are only one measure of the value of proved reserves.

F-2223

Table of Contents

Changes in Estimated Reserve Quantities

The net interest in estimated quantities of proved developed reserves of crude oil and natural gas at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, and changes in such quantities during each of the years then ended, were as follows:

2016

2015

2017

2016

Oil (BBL)

Gas (MCF)

Oil (BBL)

Gas (MCF)

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves:

Beginning of period

35,~~600~~853

2,~~510~~014,~~700~~921

13,~~781~~600

42,~~131~~510,~~806~~700

Revisions of previous estimates

2(5,~~446~~549

)

74307,~~983~~371

~~(178~~2,446

)

(174,~~323,750~~983

)

Production

(~~193~~102

)

(~~232~~190,~~539~~111

)

(~~403~~193

)

(~~363~~232,~~168~~539

)

Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery

~~112,265~~40

48112,~~912~~265

Purchase of minerals in place

~~2,400~~-

~~16,900~~-

Sales of minerals in place

~~(450,488~~-

)

-(450,488

)

Proved reserves end of period

~~5,853~~202

2,~~014~~132,~~921~~221

35,~~600~~853

2,~~510~~014,~~700~~921

2016

2015

2017

2016

Oil (BBL)

Gas (MCF)

Oil (BBL)

Gas (MCF)

Proved developed reserves:

Beginning of period

-5,823

21,~~174~~699,~~100~~997

~~587~~-

32,~~786~~174,~~785~~100

End of period

~~5,823~~202

1,~~699~~798,~~997~~697

-5,823

21,~~174~~699,~~100~~997

2016

2015

2017

2016

Oil (BBL)

Gas (MCF)

Oil (BBL)

Gas (MCF)

Proved undeveloped reserves:

Beginning of period

~~3,600~~-

~~336~~314,~~600~~925

13,~~194~~600

~~345~~336,~~021~~600

End of period

~~314~~333,~~925~~524

~~3,600~~-

~~336~~314,~~600~~925

For December 31, 2017, our previously estimated proved developed and undeveloped reserve quantities were revised upward by approximately 307,371 MCF of natural gas. This upward revision reflected higher than previously estimated proved producing and non-producing natural gas reserves at eight California wells and one Utah well. A location which had 63,350 MCF in proved developed reserves at December 31, 2016, was drilled and began in 2011, was revised upward 122,998 MCF at December 31, 2017. Two locations which had 128,165 MCF in proved developed reserves at December 31, 2016, were drilled and began producing prior to 2000, were revised upward 118,006 MCF at December 31, 2017. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2010, which had proved developed reserves of 618,709 was revised upward 15,227 MCF at December 31, 2017. A location in Utah which was drilled and began producing in 2006, was revised upward 14,688 MCF at December 31, 2017. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2012, had no proved developed reserves at December 31, 2016, was revised upward 10,994 MCF at December 31, 2017. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2008, had proved developed reserves of 13,878 at December 31, 2016, was revised upward 6,084 MCF at December 31, 2017. A location which had proved undeveloped reserves of 314,925 MCF at December 31, 2016, was revised upward 18,598 MCF at December 31, 2017.

For December 31, 2016, natural gas extensions, discoveries and improved recovery were 112,265 MCF which was added due to the drilling of two new exploratory wells and one new developmental well during 2016. The three new wells consisted of 99,762 MCF of proved developed producing reserves at year end. A location which had 187,500 MCF in proved developed reserves at December 31, 2015, was drilled and began producing prior to 2000, was revised downward 150,609 MCF at December 31, 2016. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2009, which had proved developed reserves of 400,400 was revised upward 71,607 MCF at December 31, 2016. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2015, was revised downward 44,600 MCF at December 31, 2016. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2010, had proved developed reserves of 592,700 at December 31, 2015, was revised upward 31,843 MCF at December 31, 2016. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2015, which had proved undeveloped reserves of 16,900, was revised upward 20,099 MCF at December 31, 2016. Four locations which were drilled prior to 2015, had a total of 249,500 MCF of proved developed reserves at December 31, 2015, were revised upward 37,181 MCF at December 31, 2016. Additionally in 2016, two locations which were drilled prior to 2009, were revised upward 44,175 MCF at December 31, 2016.

For December 31, 2015, natural gas extensions, discoveries and improved recovery were 48,912 MCF which was added due to the drilling one new exploratory well during 2015. This new well consisted of 4,312 MCF of proved developed producing reserves and 44,600 proved developed nonF-producing reserves. A location which had 658,894 MCF in proved developed reserves at December 31, 2014, was drilled and began producing in 2014, was revised downward 566,405 MCF at December 31, 2015. A location which was drilled in 2011 and began producing in 2013, was revised downward 135,729 MCF at December 31, 2015. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2012, had proved developed producing reserves of 229,287 at December 31, 2014, was revised downward 184,436 MCF at December 31, 2015. A location which was drilled and began producing in 2013, had proved developed producing reserves of 111,445 at December 31, 2014, was revised downward 80,486 MCF at December 31, 2015. Additionally in 2015, four locations which were drilled prior to 2011, had a total of 905,646 MCF of proved developed reserves at December 31, 2014, were revised downward 306,366 MCF at December 31, 2015.24

F-23

Table of Contents

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is presented below for the two years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

The future net cash inflows are developed as follows:

• Estimates are made of quantities of proved reserves and the future periods during which they are expected to be produced based on year-end economic conditions. • The estimated future production of proved reserves is priced on the basis of year-end prices. • The resulting future gross revenue streams are reduced by estimated future costs to develop and to produce proved reserves, based on year-end estimates. Estimated future development costs by year are as follows:

2017	$	467,400
2018		-
2019		34,000
Thereafter		55,100
Total	$	556,500

•	The estimated future production of proved reserves is priced on the basis of year-end prices.

•	The resulting future gross revenue streams are reduced by estimated future costs to develop and to produce proved reserves, based on year-end estimates. Estimated future development costs by year are as follows:

2018	$	103,300
2019		342,700
2020		-
Thereafter		134,800

Total	$	580,800

The resulting future net revenue streams are reduced to present value amounts by applying a ten percent discount.

Disclosure of principal components of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows provides information concerning the factors involved in making the calculation. In addition, the disclosure of both undiscounted and discounted net cash flows provides a measure of comparing proved oil and gas reserves both with and without an estimate of production timing. The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow relating to proved reserves reflects estimated income taxes.

Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow from proved reserve quantities

This statement discloses the sources of changes in the standardized measure from year to year. The amount reported as “Net changes in prices and production costs” represents the present value of changes in prices and production costs multiplied by estimates of proved reserves as of the beginning of the year. The “accretion of discount” was computed by multiplying the ten percent discount factor by the standardized measure on a pretax basis as of the beginning of the year. The “Sales of oil and gas produced, net of production costs” are expressed in actual dollar amounts. “Revisions of previous quantity estimates” is expressed at year-end prices. The “Net change in income taxes” is computed as the change in present value of future income taxes.

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Future cash inflows	$	56,~~270~~065,~~400~~500			65,~~962~~270,~~900~~400
Future production costs		(12,~~744~~117,~~200~~900	)		(31,~~066~~744,200	)
Future development costs		(~~556~~580,~~500~~800	)		(~~662~~556,~~800~~500	)
Future income tax expense		(~~890~~1,~~910~~010,040	)		(~~970~~890,~~170~~910	)
Future net cash flows		2,~~078~~356,~~790~~760			2,~~263~~078,~~730~~790
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows		(~~595~~712,~~518~~072	)		(~~704~~595,~~014~~518	)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows	$	1,~~483~~644,~~272~~688			1,~~559~~483,~~716~~272
Sales of oil and gas produced, net of production costs	$	(55161,~~272~~139	)		(~~155~~55,~~847~~272	)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates		~~120~~87,~~833~~956			(5120,~~089,087~~833	)
Net changes in prices and production costs		~~(253~~106,~~313~~303	)		(2253,~~238,956~~313	)
Sales of minerals in place		~~(402,900~~-	)		-(402,900	)
Purchases of minerals in place		-			~~6,000~~-
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery		~~184,476~~74			36184,~~000~~476
Accretion of discount		~~296~~197,~~970~~400			~~220~~296,~~000~~970
Net change in income tax		32(69,~~762~~178	)		232,~~166,567~~762
Net increase (decrease)	$	~~(76~~161,~~444~~416	)		(576,~~055,323~~444	)

F-2425

Table of Contents

Future Development Costs

In order to realize future revenues from our proved reserves estimated in our reserve report, it will be necessary to incur future costs to develop and produce the proved reserves. The following table estimates the costs to develop and produce our proved reserves in the years ~~2017~~2018 through ~~2019~~2020.

Future development cost of:	~~2017~~2018		~~2018~~2019		~~2019~~2020
Proved developed reserves	$	-	$	-	$	-
Proved non-producing reserves		~~124~~103,~~700~~300		-		~~34,000~~-
Proved undeveloped reserves		~~342,700~~-		-342,700		-
Total	$	~~467~~103,~~400~~300	$	-342,700	$	~~34,000~~-

Common assumptions include such matters as the real extent and average thickness of a particular reservoir, the average porosity and permeability of the reservoir, the anticipated future production from existing and future wells, future development and production costs and the ultimate hydrocarbon recovery percentage. As a result, oil and gas reserve estimates and discounted present value estimates are frequently revised in subsequent periods to reflect production data obtained after the date of the original estimate. If the reserve estimates are inaccurate, production rates may decline more rapidly than anticipated, and future production revenues may be less than estimated.

Additional data relating to Royale Energy'’s oil and natural gas properties is disclosed in Supplemental Information About Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited), attached to Royale Energy'’s Financial Statements, beginning on page F-1.

Historic Development Costs for Proved Reserves

In each year we expend funds to drill and develop some of our proved undeveloped reserves. The following table summarizes our historic costs incurred in each of the past three fiscal years to drill and develop reserves that were classified as proved undeveloped reserves as of December 31 of the immediately preceding year:

2017	$	-
2016	$	243,583
2015	$	-
2014	$	549,236

F-2526

Filing Compare · ROYALE ENERGY FUNDS, INC