UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of ~~January~~March 2016

Commission File Number 001-36575

MACROCURE LTD.

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

25 Hasivim Street

Petach Tikva 4959383, Israel

(Address of Principal Executive Office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F x Form 40-F o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o

CONTENT

~~On January 13, 2016,~~ Macrocure Ltd. ~~(“we~~,” ~~“us”~~ or the “Company”), ~~held~~hereby ~~its~~reports ~~annual~~that ~~general~~on ~~meeting~~March of10, ~~shareholders~~2016, (the ~~“Meeting”).~~United AtStates District Court for the ~~Meeting,~~District ~~our~~of ~~shareholders~~Maryland, ~~voted~~or onthe ~~two~~U.S. ~~proposals~~District Court, ~~which~~dismissed ~~were~~the ~~described~~action inbrought ~~more~~against ~~detail~~the inCompany ~~our~~by ~~proxy~~Cognate ~~statement~~Bioservices, ~~for~~Inc., ~~the~~or ~~Meeting~~Cognate, ~~(the~~and ~~“Proxy~~other ~~Statement”)~~plaintiffs in that ~~was~~court. ~~attached~~As asreported ~~Exhibit~~previously, ~~99.1~~in toMarch ~~our~~2015, ~~Report~~Cognate ofand ~~Foreign~~additional ~~Private~~plaintiffs ~~Issuer~~had onadded ~~Form~~the ~~6-K~~Company ~~that~~as wea ~~furnished~~defendant toin a case in the ~~Securities~~U.S. ~~and~~District ~~Exchange~~Court ~~Commission~~that (they had brought against the ~~“SEC”)~~Company’s onformer ~~December~~employee 16for, ~~2015.~~among ~~The~~other ~~results~~things, misappropriation of ~~the~~trade ~~voting~~secrets. onCognate’s ~~the~~amended ~~proposals~~complaint ~~presented~~had atalleged, ~~the~~among ~~Meeting~~other claims, ~~based~~that on the ~~presence~~Company inhad ~~person~~violated orthe byComputer ~~proxy~~Fraud ofand ~~holders~~Abuse ofAct ~~8,254,162~~and ~~(48.4%)~~had ofmisappropriated ~~our~~products ~~outstanding~~and ~~ordinary~~trade ~~shares,~~secrets ~~were~~of ~~as follows:~~Cognate.

~~Proposal~~In 1:its ~~Re-election~~ruling, tothe U.S. District Court granted the Company’s ~~Board~~Rule of12 ~~Directors~~res judicata motion, ofand ~~each~~converted ofits ~~the~~decision ~~following~~to ~~current~~a ~~directors~~summary ~~(who~~judgment ~~together~~determination, ~~constitute~~and ~~all~~dismissed ~~directors~~Cognate’s ofentire case against the Company ~~who~~and ~~are~~all ~~not~~other ~~External~~defendants. Cognate ~~Directors,~~has asindicated ~~defined~~ (in ~~the~~its ~~Israeli~~briefs ~~Companies~~filed ~~Law,~~in ~~5759-1999~~a ~~(the~~related ~~“Companies~~Israeli ~~Law”)),~~proceeding todescribed ~~serve~~below) ~~for~~that ait ~~one~~will ~~year~~be ~~term,~~appealing ~~until~~ the ~~close~~court’s ofdecision ~~the~~to ~~next~~a ~~annual~~court ~~general~~of ~~meeting~~appeals ofin ~~shareholders~~the ~~and~~United ~~until~~States ~~their~~within ~~successors~~the ~~are~~period ~~duly~~provided ~~elected~~for ~~and~~such ~~qualified:~~appeal.

~~Tomer~~In ~~Kariv:~~light of the foregoing dismissal in the U.S. District Court, the Company has filed a motion for dismissal of the ongoing, related proceeding that had been brought against it in the Israeli Magistrate Court of Rishon Lezion, in which the U.S. District Court had requested that evidence be collected from the Company based on the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (March 18, 1970). Cognate will have the opportunity to reply to the Company’s dismissal motion. In parallel, Cognate has requested from the Israeli District Court (where the Company’s motion for leave to appeal on one matter decided by the Israeli Magistrate Court is pending) that the proceeding in the Israeli District Court be suspended for 30 days in light of its intended appeal of the dismissal in the U.S. District Court.

For		Against		Abstain
8,236,158		12,769		5,235

The Company intends to provide further updates as further material decisions are reached in the U.S. and/or Israeli proceedings on this matter.

David Ben-Ami:

For		Against		Abstain
8,228,139		10,388		15,635

Ze’ev Bronfeld:

For		Against		Abstain
8,223,738		14,789		15,635

Ranan Grobman

For		Against		Abstain
8,225,508		13,019		15,635

Proposal 2: Re-appointment of Somekh Chaikin, Certified Public Accountants (Isr.), a member firm of KPMG International, as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 and for the additional period until the close of the next annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company, and authorization of their remuneration to be fixed, in accordance with the volume and nature of their services, by the Audit Committee and/or the Board of Directors:

For		Against		Abstain
8,232,587		10,230		11,345

Based on the above results and the majority requirements achieved under the Companies Law and our Articles of Association, the above proposals were approved at the Meeting.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MACROCURE LTD.
Date: January 13, 2016	By:	/s/ Shai Lankry
Date: March 16, 2016	By:	/s/ Shai Lankry
		Name: Shai Lankry
		Title: CFO
		Title: Chief Financial Officer

Filing Compare · Macrocure Ltd.