UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________

FORM 10-Q

þ	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010
	or
¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number 001-31434

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas	75-1458323
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. employer Identification No.)
1301 S. Capital of Texas Highway, Suite C-300, Austin, Texas 78746
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(512) 328-0888
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Texas	75-1458323
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. employer Identification No.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Title of Each Class Common Stock, $.10 par value	Number of Shares Outstanding At July 30, 2010 6,834,369

1301 S. Capital of Texas Highway, Suite C-300, Austin, Texas 78746

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(512) 328-0888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Title of Each Class Common Stock, $.10 par value	Number of Shares Outstanding At November 1, 2010 6,827,481

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.

Table of Contents to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

		Page
	Part I Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009	3
	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009	3
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	5
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	5
	Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Six Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	7
	Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	7
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	9
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	9
	Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	4742
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4944
	Part II Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	5045
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5045
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	5046
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	5146
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	5146
Item 5.	Other Information	5146
Item 6.	Exhibits	5246

PART 1
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)	~~June~~September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Assets	(Unaudited)
Investments:
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value	$	~~235~~241,~~401~~112	$	226,583
Equity securities available for sale, at fair value		10,~~934~~835		12,944
Other invested assets		1,~~703~~590		1,534
Total investments		~~248~~253,~~038~~537		241,061
Cash and cash equivalents		15,~~781~~330		18,277
Accrued investment income		1,~~735~~824		1,700
Premiums receivable		1716,~~543~~817		15,678
Reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses		6,~~590~~416		8,897
Other amounts receivable under reinsurance contracts		-		785
Deferred policy acquisition costs		2,~~369~~426		2,335
Income tax receivable		24,~~484~~178		623
Deferred tax assets		53,~~488~~117		6,015
Property and equipment, net		~~436~~378		406
Intangible assets		2,~~535~~527		2,563
Other assets		41,~~237~~320		1,432
Total assets	$	307,~~236~~870	$	299,772

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)	~~June 30,~~		~~December 31,~~
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Liabilities	(Unaudited)
Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expense	$	8785,~~721~~842	$	88,668
Unearned premiums		3638,~~988~~385		36,341
Reinsurance premiums payable		1529		30
Funds held under reinsurance treaties		2,~~700~~410		2,379
Trade payables		12,~~922~~116		94
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,~~724~~255		6,371
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		~~5,576~~-		6,679
Total liabilities		~~140~~134,~~646~~037		140,562
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 6,807,369 and 6,876,215 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		681		688
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 6,827,481 and 6,876,215 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		683		688
Additional paid-in capital		81,~~391~~915		81,784
Accumulated other comprehensive income		57,~~660~~570		5,345
Retained earnings		7883,~~858~~665		71,393
Total shareholders' equity		~~166~~173,~~590~~833		159,210
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity	$	307,~~236~~870	$	299,772

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended September 30,
	June 30,				June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
REVENUES
Gross premiums written	$	1417,~~456~~782	$	1421,~~682~~446	$	3350,~~080~~862	$	3253,~~222~~668
Premiums ceded		(~~104~~243)		~~335~~676		(~~253~~496)		~~663~~1,339
Change in unearned premiums		(1,~~719~~397)		1(4,~~808~~527)		(~~647~~2,044)		~~397~~(4,130)
Net premiums earned		16,~~071~~142		1617,~~825~~595		3248,~~180~~322		3350,~~282~~877
Investment income, net of investment expense		2,~~454~~268		2,~~666~~351		46,~~954~~989		57,~~217~~358
Realized capital gains (losses), net		~~185~~347		~~(142)~~150		~~136~~526		(~~517~~352)
Other-than-temporary impairments		(59457)		(~~1,100~~238)		(~~100~~557)		(2,~~007~~245)
Financial services		2,074		1,827		3,514		3,275
Other revenue		33		70		105		172
Other revenue		16		45		72		102
Total revenues		18,333		19,928		55,385		55,810
Total revenues		20,741		20,121		40,756		39,352
EXPENSES
Losses and loss adjustment expenses		4,~~874~~228		6,~~797~~421		1116,~~815~~043		1219,~~918~~339
Other underwriting expenses		2,~~529~~804		23,~~510~~079		58,~~688~~541		58,~~731~~866
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs		61(57)		~~264~~(331)		(3491)		83(248)
Financial services expenses		2,363		1,747		4,055		3,375
General and administrative expenses		2,864		1,358		5,914		3,788
General and administrative expenses		1,538		1,164		3,004		2,388
Total expenses		9,839		10,527		30,407		31,745
Total expenses		11,365		12,482		24,528		24,495
Income from continuing operations		8,494		9,401		24,978		24,065
Income from operations		9,376		7,639		16,228		14,857
Income tax expense		3,392		3,139		8,981		8,270
Income tax expense		3,176		2,718		5,500		5,206
Net income from continuing operations		5,102		6,262		15,997		15,795
Net income	$	6,200	$	4,921	$	10,728	$	9,651
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		(200)		180		(367)		298
Net income	$	4,902	$	6,442	$	15,630	$	16,093

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)	Three Months Ended September 30,				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended September 30,
	June 30,				June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Net income per common share
Basic:
Net Income	$	0.91	$	0.71	$	1.57	$	1.39
Income from continuing operations	$	0.75	$	0.91	$	2.35	$	2.28
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(0.03)		0.02		(0.06)		0.04
Net Income	$	0.72	$	0.93	$	2.29	$	2.32
Diluted:
Net Income	$	0.90	$	0.70	$	1.54	$	1.36
Income from continuing operations	$	0.74	$	0.90	$	2.30	$	2.23
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		6,813		6,923		6,835		6,958
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(0.03)		0.02		(0.05)		0.05
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		6,923		7,007		6,950		7,089
Net Income	$	0.71	$	0.92	$	2.25	$	2.28
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		6,782		6,891		6,817		6,936
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		6,936		6,989		6,950		7,073

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Six Months ended June 30, 2010
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)										~~Accumulated~~
										Accumulated
				Additional						Other				Total
	Shares	Common		Paid-In		Retained		Comprehensive		Comprehensive		Treasury		Shareholders'
	Outstanding	Stock		Capital		Earnings		Income		Income		Stock		Equity
Balance December 31, 2009	6,876,215	$	688	$	81,784	$	71,393			$	5,345	$	-	$	159,210
Comprehensive income:
Net income	-		-		-		415,~~528~~630		415,~~528~~630		-		-		415,~~528~~630
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities, (net of reclassification adjustment)	-		-		-		-		~~507~~2,225		~~507~~2,225		-		~~507~~2,225
Comprehensive income:								$	517,~~035~~855
Stock options expensed	-		-		~~112~~365		-				-		-		~~112~~365
Stock options exercised- proceeds	1857,000		26		~~230~~693		-				-		-		~~232~~699
Stock options exercised- exchanged	514,~~200~~900		-1		81198		-				-		-		81199
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options	-		-		87314		-				-		-		87314
Treasury stock purchases	-		-		-		-				-		(~~608~~2,797)		(~~608~~2,797)
Cancelled treasury stock - purchased	(23111,~~608~~196)		(211)		(~~281~~1,327)		(~~237~~1,219)				-		~~520~~2,557		-
Cancelled treasury stock - exchanged	(39,~~350~~438)		-(1)		(40112)		(48127)				-		88240		-(0)
Balance March 31, 2010	6,872,457	$	687	$	81,973	$	75,635			$	5,852	$	-	$	164,147
Comprehensive income:
Net income	-		-		-		6,200		6,200		-		-		6,200
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized loss on securities, (net of reclassification adjustment)	-		-		-		-		(192)		(192)		-		(192)
Comprehensive income:								$	6,009
Stock options expensed	-		-		114		-				-		-		114
Stock options exercised- proceeds	10,000		1		115		-				-		-		116
Stock options exercised- exchanged	9,700		1		117		-				-		-		118
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options	-		-		85		-				-		-		85
Treasury stock purchases	-		-		-		-				-		(1,987)		(1,987)
Cancelled treasury stock - purchased	(78,700)		(8)		(940)		(887)				-		1,835		-
Cancelled treasury stock - exchanged	(6,088)		-		(73)		(79)				-		152		-
Dividends paid	-		-		-		(2,011)				-		-		(2,011)
Balance June 30, 2010	6,807,369	$	681	$	81,391	$	78,858			$	5,660	$	-	$	166,590
Balance September 30, 2010	6,827,481	$	683	$	81,915	$	83,665			$	7,570	$	-	$	173,833

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (CONTINUED)
For the Six Months ended June 30, 2009
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)										~~Accumulated~~
										Accumulated
				Additional						Other				Total
	Shares	Common		Paid-In		Retained		Comprehensive		Comprehensive		Treasury		Shareholders'
	Outstanding	Stock		Capital		Earnings		Income		Income		Stock		Equity
Balance December 31, 2008	7,014,386	$	701	$	82,329	$	53,067			$	368	$	-	$	136,465
Comprehensive income:
Net income	-		-		-		416,~~730~~093		416,~~730~~093		-		-		416,~~730~~093
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities, (net of reclassification adjustment)	-		-		-		-		1,821		1,821		-		1,821
Unrealized gain on securities, (net of reclassification adjustment (Note 15))	-		-		-		-		5,287		5,287		-		5,287
Comprehensive income:								$	621,~~551~~380
Stock options expensed	-		-		~~161~~359		-				-		-		~~161~~359
Stock options exercised- exchanged	30119,~~000~~050		311		~~415~~1,576		-				-		-		~~418~~1,587
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options	-		-		5206		-				-		-		5206
Treasury stock purchases	-		-		-		-				-		(14,~~506~~997)		(14,~~506~~997)
Cancelled treasury stock - purchased	(55159,~~082~~406)		(515)		(~~648~~1,878)		(~~435~~1,325)				-		13,~~088~~218		-
Cancelled treasury stock - exchanged	(2082,~~480~~957)		(28)		(~~241~~979)		(~~175~~792)				-		~~418~~1,779		-
Deferred compensation granted	2,300		-		45		-				-		-		45
Balance March 31, 2009	6,971,124	$	697	$	82,066	$	57,187			$	2,189	$	-	$	142,139
Comprehensive income:
Net income	-		-		-		4,921		4,921		-		-		4,921
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities, (net of reclassification adjustment)	-		-		-		-		754		754		-		754
Comprehensive income:								$	5,675
Stock options expensed	-		-		121		-				-		-		121
Stock options exercised- exchanged	70,450		7		860		-				-		-		867
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options	-		-		181		-				-		-		181
Treasury stock purchases	-		-		-		-				-		(2,709)		(2,709)
Cancelled treasury stock - purchased	(84,020)		(8)		(990)		(685)				-		1,683		-
Cancelled treasury stock - exchanged	(48,073)		(5)		(568)		(453)				-		1,026		-
Dividends paid ($0.30 per share)	-		-		-		(2,028)				-		-		(2,028)
Balance June 30, 2009	6,909,481	$	691	$	81,670	$	58,942			$	2,943	$	-	$	144,246
Balance September 30, 2009	6,893,373	$	689	$	81,658	$	65,015			$	5,655	$	-	$	153,017

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
	Six Months Ended
(in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	June 30,
	2010		2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Income	$	1015,~~728~~630	$	916,~~651~~093
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and accretion of investments		~~261~~840		(98127)
Depreciation and amortization		~~222~~317		~~377~~549
Realized (gains) losses on investments		(~~136~~526)		~~517~~357
Other than temporary impairments		~~100~~557		2,~~007~~245
Change in deferred acquisition costs		(3491)		83(248)
Common stock awarded		-		45
Stock options expensed		~~226~~365		~~282~~359
Deferred income tax benefit		~~357~~1,700		~~(802)~~994
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		(~~172~~314)		(~~186~~206)
Other non-cash items		-		~~125~~(13)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisition:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
Premium receivables, net		(1,~~865~~139)		(~~230~~2,249)
Other amounts receivable under reinsurance contracts		785		1,~~497~~310
Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid and paid loss expenses		2,~~307~~481		3,~~274~~943
Funds held under reinsurance treaties		~~321~~31		~~286~~(723)
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses		(~~947~~2,826)		(~~1,738~~748)
Unearned premiums		~~647~~2,044		~~(396)~~4,131
Other receivables and assets		~~136~~(12)		~~409~~261
Federal income tax receivable/payable		(13,~~689~~241)		(~~100~~2,259)
Accrued expenses & other liabilities		(385)		184
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		26		(1,011)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1016,~~862~~627		1522,~~187~~703
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(~~222~~251)		(~~170~~242)
Proceeds from the sale and maturities of available-for-sale equity and fixed maturity securities		3552,~~657~~868		6486,~~794~~081
Purchase of available-for-sale equity and fixed maturity securities		(4361,~~687~~331)		(67107,~~343~~798)
Collection of notes receivable and other		-		125
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,~~252~~714)		(221,~~594~~834)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		~~172~~314		~~186~~206
Exercise of stock options		~~348~~699		-
Repurchases of common stock		(2,~~355~~557)		(23,~~771~~218)
Dividend paid		(2,011)		(2,028)
Preferred stock redemption		(17,~~260~~305)		(1,209)
Net cash used in financing activities		(510,~~106~~860)		(56,~~822~~249)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(2,~~496~~947)		6(5,~~771~~380)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		18,277		22,060
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	15,~~781~~330	$	2816,~~831~~680

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~June~~September 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The ~~consolidated~~ unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 reflect all adjustments which are, in our opinion , necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. These consolidated financial statements have not been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. The operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year.

During August 2010, we ceased all operations within our Financial Services segment. As such, in accordance with ASC 205 Discontinued Operations and ASC 420 Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, all financial results relating to that segment have been reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented within the statements of operations herein (see Note 14. Discontinued Operations and Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies)

The notes to consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Management’s Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including our most significant estimates related to: reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses; death, disability and retirement reserves; reinsurance premiums recoverable/payable; premiums ceded; deferred policy acquisition costs; impairment of assets including the fair value of investments; bad debts; income taxes; and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Although considerable judgment is inherent in these estimates, we believe that the current estimates are reasonable in all material respects. The estimates are reviewed regularly and adjusted, as necessary. Adjustments related to changes in estimates are reflected in our results of operations, or other comprehensive income (OCI), in the period in which those estimates are changed.

32.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (subtopic ASC 820-10). ASC 820-10 provides guidance as to how the fair value of a security may be measured, and describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. This update requires new disclosures regarding transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. A reporting entity shall disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. We did not have any transfers in or out of Level 1. We ~~and~~had ~~Level~~a 2net ~~fair~~of ~~value~~$420,000 ~~measurements~~transferred ~~for~~into ~~the~~Level ~~three~~3 orfrom ~~six~~Level ~~months~~2 ~~periods~~during the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. With respect to Level 3 fair value measurements, activity in the reconciliation for these fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs now requires the reporting entity to separately present information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis instead of as a net number. This update also clarifies existing disclosures with respect to the level of aggregation disclosed and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. Specifically, a reporting entity shall provide fair value measurements for each class of assets and liabilities. A reporting entity shall also provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements, which are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 1 or Level 2. The new disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward in Level 3 activity. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the requirements of the Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 effective January 1, 2010.

43.

Investments

Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturities. Of the total $~~235~~241,~~401~~112,000 portfolio balance in available-for-sale fixed income maturities at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, all but $2,~~271~~997,000 are considered investment grade securities.

Our entire fixed income portfolio consists of investment grade securities rated “BBB” or higher by Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s or Fitch rating agencies with the exception of ~~one~~two corporate ~~bond~~bonds and six collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) with a combined fair market value of approximately $2,~~271~~997,000. The following table reflects the composition of our fixed income portfolio by security rating category of the issuer as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010. In cases where the rating agencies had a different rating assigned to a security, the classification in the table is the lower rating.

	Fair Value (in thousands)
	Fair Value
Rating Category	(in thousands)		Percentage
AAA / Aaa	$	~~156~~150,~~872~~525	6763%
AA / Aa		2729,~~340~~054	1112%
A / A		3343,~~249~~067	1418%
BBB		15,~~669~~469	76%
Non-investment grade		2,~~271~~997	1%
Total	$	~~235~~241,~~401~~112	100%

Available-For-Sale Equity Securities. We account for equity securities as available-for-sale. Our equity portfolio totals $10,~~934~~835,000 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments in fixed income and equity securities at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

	Cost or						Estimated
June 30, 2010	Amortized		Gross Unrealized				Fair
September 30, 2010	Amortized		Gross Unrealized				Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Fixed Maturities:
U.S. treasury notes / bills	$	16,~~776~~731	$	~~889~~872	$	-	$	17,~~665~~603
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed bonds		1817,~~886~~504		1,~~738~~491		-		2018,~~624~~995
U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations		3936,~~219~~118		21,~~065~~927		6-		4138,~~278~~045
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Prime CMOs		21,~~057~~816		~~148~~103		-		21,~~205~~919
Alt A CMOs		21,~~158~~827		~~125~~206		-		2,~~283~~033
U.S. government agency bonds / notes		1713,~~512~~003		~~207~~146		-		1713,~~719~~149
Government tax-exempt bonds		3234,~~264~~325		12,~~811~~701		-7		3437,~~075~~019
Corporate bonds		98109,~~046~~281		23,~~165~~182		~~659~~114		99112,~~552~~349
Total fixed maturities		~~226~~230,~~918~~605		910,~~148~~628		~~665~~121		~~235~~241,~~401~~112
Equity securities		109,~~708~~696		~~697~~1,325		~~471~~186		10,~~934~~835
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	~~237~~240,~~626~~301	$	911,~~845~~953	$	~~1,136~~307	$	~~246~~251,~~335~~947

	Cost or		Gross		Gross		Estimated
December 31, 2009	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Fixed Maturities:
U.S. treasury notes / bills	$	19,098	$	897	$	-	$	19,995
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed bonds		22,525		1,419		-		23,944
U.S. government agency mortage-backed bonds		22,525		1,419		-		23,944
U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations		42,762		2,169		-		44,931
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Alt A CMOs		2,287		114		-		2,401
Prime CMOs		2,375		25		-		2,400
U.S. government agency bonds / notes		22,052		274		64		22,262
Government tax-exempt bonds		35,212		1,584		1		36,795
Corporate bonds		72,910		983		38		73,855
Total fixed maturities		219,221		7,465		103		226,583
Equity securities		12,081		1,013		150		12,944
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	231,302	$	8,478	$	253	$	239,527

Of our entire invested assets at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, including cash and cash equivalents:

2321% is comprised of agency-backed mortgage obligations, with underlying collateral consisting of GNMA, FHLMC, or FNMA loans;

2% is comprised of non-agency CMOs;

6467% is comprised of U.S. Treasury, government agency bonds and notes, municipal tax exempt bonds and corporate bonds; and

1110% is comprised of cash, equities and other invested assets.

We regularly review our fixed maturity and equity securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”). For an equity security, if we do not have the ability and intent to hold the security for a sufficient period of time to allow for a recovery in value, we conclude that an OTTI has occurred, and the cost of the equity security is written down to the current fair value, with a corresponding charge to realized loss in our consolidated statements of operations. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we evaluated our equity portfolio for OTTI of certain securities. We based our review on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the severity and duration of the decline in fair value of the equity security as well as the cause of the decline, the length of time we have held the equity security, any third party research reports or analysis, and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the security’s issuer, taking into consideration the economic prospects of the issuer’s industry and geographical location. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there were no$105,000 write-downs in equity securities.

Within our portfolio at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there were seven CMO securities classified as “Alternative-A” or “Alt-A”. These Alt-A securities are generally considered to have underlying mortgages with underwriting characteristics that are stronger than “subprime” mortgages but less stringent than “prime” mortgages. None of our CMOs have underlying mortgages classified as “subprime.” Also, all underlying mortgages of our CMOs have fixed rates.

~~Beginning~~While ~~with the three months ended September 30, 2007,~~ we ~~saw~~have ~~a significant and rapid decline in~~ the ~~market~~ability ~~value~~to ofhold our remaining non-agency CMOs to maturity, ~~specifically~~we ~~our~~have ~~Alt-A~~concluded ~~securities.~~that Wewe have ~~considered~~ the ~~deepening~~intent ~~national~~to ~~housing~~sell ~~crisis~~these ~~and~~securities ~~its~~which ~~potential~~will ~~effects~~further onreduce ~~the~~our ~~underlying~~exposure ~~collateral~~to ina ~~evaluating~~continued ~~this~~deterioration ~~decline,~~of ~~and~~the ~~concluded~~housing ~~that~~sector ~~the~~provided ~~continued~~we ~~decreases~~can inobtain ~~value~~an ofappropriate ~~our~~price. ~~Alt-A~~For ~~securities~~the ~~should~~nine bemonths ~~considered~~ended toSeptember be30, ~~OTTI.~~2010, ~~Beginning~~we inrecognized ~~the~~a ~~fourth~~loss ~~quarter~~on our non-agency CMOs of ~~2008~~$452,000, webeing ~~also~~the ~~began~~difference tobetween ~~observe~~the anbook ~~increase~~value inand ~~the~~their ~~market-reported~~fair ~~delinquency~~value ~~rates~~as ~~for~~of ~~not~~September ~~only~~30, ~~our~~2010. There ~~Alt-A~~were ~~CMOs,~~no ~~but~~sales ~~also~~of our non-agency CMOs ~~backed~~during bythe ~~prime~~nine ~~loans.~~months ~~The~~ending ~~delinquency~~September ~~data~~30, ~~suggests~~2010, ~~that continuing home price declines~~ and ~~growth~~the infair ~~unemployment~~market ~~are~~value ~~now~~of ~~affecting~~our ~~the~~non-agency ~~behavior~~CMOs byis a$3,952,000 ~~broader~~as ~~sector~~ of ~~mortgage~~September ~~borrowers~~30, ~~particularly~~2010. ~~those~~We ~~mortgages~~sold ~~originated~~non-agency ~~subsequent~~CMOs towith ~~2005.~~a ~~Rising~~book ~~unemployment,~~value ~~housing~~of ~~price declines~~$17,035,000 ~~tight~~during ~~credit~~the ~~conditions,~~first ~~volatility~~nine inmonths ~~interest~~of ~~rates~~2009 and ~~weakening~~recognized ~~consumer~~a ~~confidence~~net ~~not~~realized ~~only~~loss ~~contributed~~of ~~to rising delinquencies~~$161,000 ~~but~~on ~~also~~the ~~significantly~~sale ~~impacted our expectations regarding future performance, both~~ of ~~which~~these ~~are critical to assessing our OTTI~~securities.

~~While~~The wepretax ~~have~~charges ~~the~~taken ~~ability~~as ~~to hold our remaining non-agency CMOs to maturity, we have concluded that we have the intent to sell these securities which will further reduce our exposure to~~ a ~~continued~~result ~~deterioration~~ of ~~the~~OTTIs ~~housing~~that ~~sector~~were ~~provided~~recognized wein ~~can~~earnings ~~obtain~~and anincluded ~~appropriate~~in ~~price.~~realized ~~For~~capital ~~the~~gains ~~six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a~~ (loss) onfor ~~our non-agency CMOs of $100,000, being~~ the ~~difference~~three ~~between the book value~~ and ~~their~~nine ~~fair value as of June 30, 2010. There were no sales of our non-agency CMOs during the six~~ months ~~ending~~ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, and ~~the~~2009 ~~fair~~were ~~market value of our non-agency CMOs is $4,488,000~~ as offollows ~~June~~(in ~~30,~~thousands): ~~2010.~~

The pretax charges taken as a result of OTTIs that were recognized in earnings and included in realized loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2010		September 30, 2009		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2009
Fixed Maturities:

Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Prime	$	30	$	183	$	30	$	1,334
Alt-A		322		55		422		558
Total fixed maturities		352		238		452		1,892

Equity securities		105		-		105		353

Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	457	$	238	$	557	$	2,245

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009
Fixed Maturities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Prime	$	-	$	867	$	-	$	1,151
Alt-A		59		233		100		504
Total fixed maturities		59		1,100		100		1,655
Equity securities		-		-		-		352
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	59	$	1,100	$	100	$	2,007

The aggregate write-down on the Alt-A securities beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2007 through September 30, 2010 is $11,425,000 and the book value of all the Alt-A securities is $2,033,000 as of September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, outside of our Alt-A and prime CMOs as shown in the table above, no other fixed maturities were deemed to have an OTTI.

~~The~~Gross ~~aggregate~~realized ~~write-down~~gains onand ~~the~~losses ~~Alt-A~~as ~~securities~~a ~~beginning~~result ~~with~~of ~~the~~both ~~quarter~~sales ~~ended~~and ~~September~~OTTI ~~30,~~write-downs ~~2007~~included ~~through~~in ~~June~~net ~~30,~~realized ~~2010~~loss isin ~~$11,103,000 and~~ the ~~book~~consolidated ~~value~~statements of ~~all~~operations for the ~~Alt-A~~three ~~securities~~and isnine ~~$2,158,000~~month asperiods ofended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. ~~As of June 30, 2010, outside of our Alt-A~~ and ~~prime~~2009 ~~CMOs~~were as ~~shown~~follows (in ~~the~~thousands): ~~table above, no other fixed maturities were deemed to have an OTTI.~~

Gross realized gains and losses as a result of both sales and OTTI write-downs included in net realized loss in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Realized gains (losses):

Fixed maturities:
Gross realized gain	$	21	$	119	$	101	$	392
Gross realized loss		-		(37)		(4)		(472)
Other-than-temporary losses		(352)		(238)		(452)		(1,892)
Net realized loss		(331)		(156)		(355)		(1,972)

Equities:
Gross realized gain		373		179		628		272
Gross realized loss		(47)		(111)		(199)		(544)
Other-than-temporary losses		(105)		-		(105)		(353)
Net realized loss		221		68		324		(625)

Total net realized loss	$	(110)	$	(88)	$	(31)	$	(2,597)

	Three Months				Six Months
	Ended				Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Realized gains (losses):
Fixed maturities:
Gross realized gain	$	73	$	40	$	80	$	273
Gross realized loss		(43)		(139)		(47)		(435)
Other-than-temporary losses		(59)		(1,100)		(100)		(1,655)
Net realized loss		(29)		(1,199)		(67)		(1,817)
Equities:
Gross realized gain		174		82		255		93
Gross realized loss		(19)		(125)		(152)		(448)
Other-than-temporary losses		-		-		-		(352)
Net realized loss		155		(43)		103		(707)
Total net realized loss	$	126	$	(1,242)	$	36	$	(2,524)

A summary of the amortized cost and fair market value of the Company’s investments in fixed maturities as of September 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, is as follows (in thousands):

A summary of the amortized cost and fair market value of the Company’s investments in fixed maturities as of June 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, is as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2010
	Cost or		Estimated
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Fixed maturity securities:
Due one year or less	$	45,974	$	46,319
Due after one year through five years		71,959		74,369
Due after five years through ten years		35,004		37,423
Due after ten years		20,403		22,009

		173,340		180,120
Mortgage backed securities		57,265		60,992
Total	$	230,605	$	241,112

	June 30, 2010
	Cost or		Estimated
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Fixed maturity securities:
Due one year or less	$	14,041	$	14,097
Due after one year through five years		97,740		99,542
Due after five years through ten years		29,003		30,445
Due after ten years		23,813		24,927
		164,597		169,011
Mortgage backed securities		62,321		66,390
Total	$	226,918	$	235,401

The following two tables reflect securities whose fair values were lower than the related cost basis at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively (in thousands). However, these declines in value were not deemed to constitute OTTIs. The tables show the fair value and the unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and category of duration, of individual securities in a continuous unrealized loss position.

	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
June 30, 2010	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
September 30, 2010	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss
U.S. government agency bonds / notes	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Government tax-exempt bonds	$	1,241	$	7	$	-	$	-	$	1,241	$	7
U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations		507		6		-		-		507		6
Corporate bonds		7,147		114		-		-		7,147		114
Corporate bonds		9,252		659		-		-		9,252		659
Total fixed maturities	$	8,388	$	121	$	-	$	-	$	8,388	$	121
Total fixed maturities	$	9,759	$	665	$	-	$	-	$	9,759	$	665
Equity securities	$	484	$	43	$	1,212	$	143	$	1,696	$	186
Equity securities	$	2,093	$	152	$	2,647	$	319	$	4,740	$	471
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	8,872	$	164	$	1,212	$	143	$	10,084	$	307
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	11,852	$	817	$	2,647	$	319	$	14,499	$	1,136


	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
December 31, 2009	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss
U.S. government agency bonds / notes	$	5,925	$	64	$	-	$	-	$	5,925	$	64
Government tax-exempt bonds		1,106		1		-		-		1,106		1
Corporate bonds		12,312		35		205		3		12,517		38
Total fixed maturities	$	19,343	$	100	$	205	$	3	$	19,548	$	103

Equity securities	$	388	$	20	$	2,584	$	130	$	2,972	$	150
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	19,731	$	120	$	2,789	$	133	$	22,520	$	253

The unrealized losses are primarily due to market fluctuations resulting from cyclical and other economic pressures including the recent economic crisis and market dislocation. All fixed maturities with an unrealized loss of 12 months or more are investment grade securities. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we believe that these unrealized losses are temporary and that the fair value will recover to a level equal to or greater than the cost basis. In addition, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we had the ability to hold all of our fixed maturity securities to maturity and, except for our investments in non-agency CMOs; we do not have the intent to sell these investments until there is a recovery in fair value, or until maturity. In the future, circumstances may change that would cause us to record an OTTI or sell fixed maturity or equity securities and possibly, incur a realized loss.

The major categories of net investment income included in the consolidated statements of operations are summarized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Investment income:
Fixed Maturities	$	2,260	$	2,300	$	6,922	$	7,230
Equity Securities		100		119		296		297
Short-term investments and other		53		30		102		194
Finance charges on premiums receivable		25		40		81		99
Structured annuity		19		18		57		55

Total investment income		2,457		2,507		7,458		7,875

Investment expense		189		156		469		517

Net investment income	$	2,268	$	2,351	$	6,989	$	7,358

~~The~~In ~~major~~connection ~~categories~~with our acquisition of ~~net~~our ~~investment~~insurance ~~income~~subsidiary, ~~included~~the Texas Department of Insurance (“TDI”) required that funds be set aside in an escrow account with a bank to remain until the ~~consolidated~~aggregate ~~statements~~remaining redemption obligation of ~~operations~~our ~~are~~Series ~~summarized~~A ~~for~~redeemable preferred stock (our “redeemable preferred stock”) is less than the ~~three~~amount ~~and~~of ~~six~~the ~~months~~escrow ~~ended~~balance, ~~June~~with 30no withdrawals to be made from this escrow account without prior approval from TDI or until the redeemable preferred stock is redeemed in its entirety. To satisfy this requirement, we have maintained a fixed income security in escrow in the amount of $2,500,000. This security is included in fixed maturities, available-for-sale. On September 24, 2010, we redeemed all issued and ~~2009~~outstanding shares of the redeemable preferred stock, as ~~follows~~described (more fully in ~~thousands):~~Note 9 Redeemable Preferred Stock. As a result, we have requested that TDI eliminate the escrow requirement and we anticipate they will approve this request.

(in thousands)	Three Months				Six Months
	Ended				Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Investment income:
Fixed Maturities	$	2,306	$	2,544	$	4,663	$	4,930
Equity Securities		99		95		195		179
Short-term investments and other		50		65		89		151
Finance charges on premiums receivable		24		26		57		61
Structured annuity		19		18		37		36
Total investment income		2,498		2,748		5,041		5,357
Investment expense		44		82		87		140
Net investment income	$	2,454	$	2,666	$	4,954	$	5,217

At September 30, 2010, investments with a fair market value of $4,002,000 were on deposit with state insurance departments to satisfy regulatory requirements and these securities are included in fixed maturities, available-for-sale.

In connection with our acquisition of our insurance subsidiary, the Texas Department of Insurance (“TDI”) required that funds be set aside in an escrow account with a bank to remain until the aggregate remaining redemption obligation of our Series A redeemable preferred stock is less than the amount of the escrow balance, with no withdrawals to be made from this escrow account without prior approval from TDI4. ~~To satisfy this requirement, we maintain a fixed income security in escrow in the amount of $2,500,000. This security is included in fixed maturities, available-for-sale.~~

At June 30, 2010, investments with a fair market value of $3,924,000 were on deposit with state insurance departments to satisfy regulatory requirements and these securities are included in fixed maturities, available-for-sale.

Other Comprehensive Income

Other comprehensive income (loss) shown in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity is comprised of net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of taxes. The components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	June 30,				June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Unrealized holdings (losses) gains before taxes	$	(25)	$	911	$	779	$	3,726
Unrealized holdings gains before taxes	$	3,079	$	4,207	$	3,915	$	7,229
Tax expense		9(1,078)		(~~319~~1,472)		(~~273~~1,370)		(12,~~304~~530)
Net gain after tax		~~(16)~~2,001		~~592~~2,735		~~506~~2,545		24,~~422~~699
Less reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) included in net income		~~270~~141		~~(249)~~35		~~294~~493		(~~236~~906)
Tax (expense) benefit		(9449)		87(12)		(~~103~~173)		83318
Other comprehensive income—net of tax	$	~~(192)~~1,909	$	~~754~~2,712	$	~~315~~2,225	$	25,~~575~~287

165.

Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value is used on a recurring basis for our equity and fixed maturity, available-for-sale securities in which fair value is the primary basis of accounting. We measure fair value for each security depending on whether we have Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 inputs, as described below.

~~The following table presents the estimated fair value of our financial instruments measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:~~16

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2010 Using:
			Quoted prices		Significant		Significant
	Total		in active markets		other ob-		other unob-
	June 30,		for identical assets		servable inputs		servable inputs
Description	2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Fixed Maturities:
U.S. treasury notes / bills	$	17,665	$	17,665	$	-	$	-
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed bonds		20,624				20,624		-
U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations		41,278				41,278		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Alt-A CMOs		2,283				320		1,963
Prime CMOs		2,205				1,777		428
U.S. government agency bonds / notes		17,719				17,719		-
Government tax-exempt bonds		34,075				34,075		-
Corporate bonds		99,552				99,552		-
Total fixed maturities	$	235,401	$	17,665	$	215,345	$	2,391
Equity securities		10,934		10,879		-		55
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	246,335	$	28,544	$	215,345	$	2,446

The following table presents the estimated fair value of our financial instruments measured on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010:

Level 1 consists of instruments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets. We receive quoted market prices from a third party, independent, nationally recognized pricing service. We utilize the pricing service, both for market values obtained based on quoted, actively traded market prices (Level 1) and for quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or market prices obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or comparable assets (Level 2). As of June 30, 2010, approximately 99% of our fixed income securities are priced either as Level 1 or Level 2. The fair value estimate for our equity portfolio of $10,879,000 and our U.S. Treasury fixed income securities of $17,665,000 are based on Level 1 pricing provided by the pricing service since there is an active, readily tradable market value based on quoted prices, as of June 30, 2010, or the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions occur in significant frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an on-going basis. Valuation of Level 1 securities does not entail a significant degree of judgment since an active market exists and quoted prices are readily and regularly available.


			Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 Using:
(in thousands)			Quoted prices		Significant		Significant
	Total		in active markets		other ob-		other unob-
	September 30,		for identical assets		servable inputs		servable inputs
Description	2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Fixed Maturities:
U.S. treasury notes / bills	$	17,603	$	17,603	$	-	$	-
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed bonds		18,995		-		18,995		-
U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations		38,045		-		38,045		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Alt-A CMOs		2,033		-		202		1,831
Prime CMOs		1,919		-		1,618		301
U.S. government agency bonds / notes		13,149		-		13,149		-
Government tax-exempt bonds		37,019		-		37,019		-
Corporate bonds		112,349		-		112,349		-
Total fixed maturities	$	241,112	$	17,603	$	221,377	$	2,132

Equity securities		10,835		10,835		-		-

Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	251,947	$	28,438	$	221,377	$	2,132

~~With~~Level ~~the~~1 ~~exception~~consists of Uinstruments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets.S. ~~Treasury~~We ~~securities,~~receive ~~very~~quoted ~~few~~market ofprices ~~our~~from ~~fixed~~a ~~income~~third ~~securities~~party, ~~are~~independent, ~~actively~~nationally ~~traded.~~recognized ~~Most~~pricing ofservice. ~~our~~We ~~fixed~~utilize ~~income~~the ~~securities~~pricing service, ~~such~~both asfor ~~government~~market orvalues ~~agency~~obtained ~~mortgage~~based ~~backed~~on ~~securities~~quoted, ~~tax-exempt~~actively ~~municipal~~traded ~~securities~~market prices (Level 1) and ~~corporate~~for ~~securities~~quoted ~~are~~prices ~~valued~~for ~~using~~similar aassets ~~pricing~~in ~~service~~active ~~and~~markets ~~fall~~or ~~within~~market ~~Level~~prices 2.obtained ~~Level~~from 2third-party pricing inservices ~~our~~for ~~fair~~identical ~~value~~or ~~hierarchy~~comparable ~~comprises~~assets ~~$215,345,000~~(Level or2). ~~87%~~As of ~~our~~September ~~investment~~30, ~~portfolio~~2010, ~~which~~approximately as99% of ~~June~~our ~~30,~~fixed ~~2010~~income ~~includes~~securities ~~U.S.~~are ~~Government~~priced ~~agency~~either ~~bonds/notes~~as ofLevel ~~$17,719,000;~~1 Uor Level 2.S ~~Government~~The ~~agency~~fair ~~mortgage~~value ~~backed~~estimate ~~bonds~~for our equity portfolio of $2010,~~624~~835,000; and our U.S. ~~Government~~Treasury ~~agency~~fixed ~~CMOs~~income securities of $4117,~~278~~603,000; ~~Government~~are ~~tax-exempt~~based ~~bonds~~on ofLevel ~~$34~~1 pricing provided by the pricing service since there is an active,~~075,000;~~ ~~corporate~~readily ~~bonds~~tradable market value based on quoted prices, as of ~~$99~~September 30,~~552~~ 2010,~~000;~~ ~~“prime”~~or ~~non~~the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions occur in significant frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an on-~~agency~~going ~~CMOs~~basis. Valuation of $Level 1~~,777,000;~~ ~~and~~securities ~~“Alt-A”~~does ~~non-agency~~not ~~CMOs~~entail a significant degree of ~~$320,000~~judgment since an active market exists and quoted prices are readily and regularly available.

With the exception of U.S. Treasury securities, very few of our fixed income securities are actively traded. Most of our fixed income securities, such as government or agency mortgage backed securities, tax-exempt municipal securities and corporate securities are valued using a pricing service and fall within Level 2. Level 2 pricing in our fair value hierarchy comprises $221,377,000 or 88% of our investment portfolio, which as of September 30, 2010 includes U.S. Government agency bonds/notes of $13,149,000; U.S Government agency mortgage backed bonds of $18,995,000; U.S. Government agency CMOs of $38,045,000; Government tax-exempt bonds of $37,019,000; corporate bonds of $112,349,000; “prime” non-agency CMOs of $1,618,000; and “Alt-A” non-agency CMOs of $202,000.

In ~~regards~~regard to Level 2 pricing, fair values are based on the market prices from the pricing service where valuations are based on quoted market prices for identical or similar assets and/or valuations using industry-standard models such as matrix pricing. The pricing service evaluates each asset based on relevant market information, credit information, perceived market movements and sector news. The market inputs utilized in the pricing evaluation include, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets benchmark securities, bids and offers, quoted forward prices, time value, volatility factors, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instrument, and industry news and economic events. For mortgage related products, the pricing service uses an Option Adjusted Spread model to develop prepayment and interest rate scenarios. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of inputs may change or some market inputs may not be relevant. We utilize ~~our subsidiary,~~ APS Asset Management, Inc., to review the estimates and assumptions of fair value of each security provided by the pricing service for Level 1 and Level 2 pricing and compare these estimates to our custodial bank statement, which also provides a fair market value for the securities we hold, to determine if the estimates are representative of the prices in the market. Comparing our fair value pricing obtained from our custodial bank statement serves as a cross-check to the validity of the information provided from the pricing service. Valuations are reviewed for reasonableness based upon the specifics of the security, including class, maturity, credit rating, durations, collateral and comparable markets for similar securities. We may adjust the valuation of securities from the independent pricing service when we believe its pricing does not fairly represent the market value of the investment. For example, a significant decrease in volume and level of activity for a security is an indication that transactions or quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value because in such market conditions there may be increased instances of transactions that are not orderly. In those circumstances, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and a significant adjustment to the transaction or quoted price may be necessary to determine fair value. We evaluate the following factors to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the securities we hold when compared to the normal activity for those securities (or similar securities):

there are few recent transactions;

price quotations are not based on current information;

price quotations vary substantially either over time or amount market makers (for example, broker markets);

indexes that were previously highly correlated with the fair values of the security are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent indications of fair value for that security;

there is a significant increase in the implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or performance indicators (such as delinquency rates or loss severities) for observed transactions or quoted prices when compared with the reporting entity’s estimate of expected cash flows, considering all available market data about credit or nonperformance risk for the security;

there is wide bid-ask spread or significant increase in the bid-ask spread;

there is a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuances (that is, a primary market) for the security or similar securities; and

little information is available publicly.

When market observable data is not as readily available as a result of a significant decrease in volume or level of activity for a security, the valuation of these financial instruments becomes more subjective and could involve substantial judgment, resulting in Level 3 pricing. Under Level 3 pricing, fair values are based on inputs that are considered unobservable where there is little, if any, market activity for a security. In this circumstance, we evaluate fair values derived from our internal pricing models, as well as values derived from the independent pricing service and non-binding indications received from dealers.

~~The~~Consistent ~~national~~with ~~housing~~our ~~crisis~~approach ~~and~~to ~~its~~pricing ~~impact~~our orentire ~~potential~~portfolio, ~~impact~~we initially receive market pricing on these securities from the ~~underlying~~pricing ~~collateral~~service. ofWe ~~our~~also ~~non-agency~~generally ~~CMOs~~obtain two to three indications from dealers who actively trade in these or similar securities, ~~specifically~~but ~~our~~are ~~Alt~~not binding offers. We then review the pricing on these non-Aagency CMO securities based on the market environment and ~~2006~~the ~~origination~~specific ~~year~~characteristics, ~~prime~~including: ~~non~~the overall structure of the instrument; 60-~~agency~~day ~~CMOs~~delinquencies, ~~resulted~~loss inseverities aand ~~significant~~default rates; demographic and ~~rapid~~geographic ~~decline~~characteristics of the ~~fair~~underlying ~~market~~mortgages; support levels; and loan to value ofratios. ~~these~~We ~~securities,~~also ~~especially~~utilize ininternal ~~relation~~pricing models to ~~the~~assist ~~market~~us ~~prices~~in ~~provided~~determining byestimated ~~the~~fair ~~outside~~values. Our internal pricing ~~service.~~model ~~Beginning~~incorporates ascash ~~early~~flows asfor each security based on projected losses discounted using a liquidity risk premium that market participant would demand because of the ~~third~~inherent ~~quarter~~uncertainty in the cash flows. The risk premium is reflective of ~~2007~~an ~~for~~orderly ~~Alt-A~~transaction ~~securities~~between ~~and~~market participants at the ~~fourth~~measurement ~~quarter~~date ofunder ~~2008~~current ~~for~~market ~~certain~~conditions. ofDetermining ~~our~~the ~~prime~~price ~~non-agency~~at ~~CMOs,~~which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market ~~became~~conditions ~~increasingly~~if ~~inactive~~there ~~based~~has been a significant decrease in volume or level of activity for these securities depends on: the ~~limited~~facts ~~number~~and circumstances and requires the use of ~~transactions;~~significant ~~varying~~judgment. ~~market~~We ~~prices~~weigh ~~provided~~the byindications ~~dealers;~~of ~~significant~~fair ~~increases~~value inresulting ~~implied~~from ~~liquidity~~multiple ~~risk~~valuation ~~premiums~~techniques, ~~yields,~~considering orboth ~~performance~~an ~~indicators~~income (approach such as ~~delinquency~~our ~~rates~~internal orpricing ~~loss~~model ~~severities)~~and ~~for~~a ~~observed~~market ~~transactions~~approach orthat ~~quoted~~provides ~~prices;~~estimates ~~significant~~of ~~declines~~fair orvalue ~~absence~~from ofthe apricing service and non-binding quotes from market ~~for~~participants. ~~new~~Based ~~issuances;~~on ~~and~~these indications, we consider the ~~limited~~reasonableness ~~availability~~of the range of ~~market~~estimates ~~data~~to ~~for~~determine ~~these~~the ~~securities~~point within the range that is more representative of fair value under current market conditions. ~~The~~We ~~inactivity~~select ~~was~~a ~~also~~fair ~~evidenced~~value byestimate based on professional judgment utilizing a ~~significant~~weighting ~~widening~~or blending of ~~the~~internal ~~bid~~pricing ~~and~~models, ~~ask~~the ~~spread~~fair invalue provided by the ~~dealer~~pricing ~~markets~~service inand ~~which~~non-binding ~~these~~indications. ~~securities~~This ~~trade~~is ~~and~~consistent awith ~~significant~~FASB ~~decrease~~ASC 820-10 and is appropriate in determining the fair value when the volume or level of ~~trades~~activity ~~relative~~has todecreased ~~historical~~in ~~levels~~markets that are not orderly.

~~Consistent~~As ~~with~~a ~~our~~result ~~approach~~of tothis ~~pricing our entire portfolio~~review, weas ~~initially~~of ~~received~~September ~~market~~30, ~~pricing on these securities from the pricing service. We also generally obtain two to three indications from dealers who actively trade in these or similar securities~~2010, ~~but~~we ~~are~~have ~~not~~classified ~~binding~~as ~~offers.~~Level We3 ~~then reviewed the~~ pricing onfive ~~these~~ non-agency ~~CMO~~CMOs ~~securities~~(4 ~~based~~Alt-A onCMOs ~~the market environment~~ and ~~the~~1 ~~specific characteristics, including: the overall structure of the instrument; 60~~non-~~day~~agency ~~delinquencies,~~CMO ~~loss~~with ~~severities~~2006 ~~and~~origination ~~default rates; demographic and geographic characteristics of the underlying mortgages; support levels; and loan to value ratios~~years). WeThe ~~also~~total ~~utilized internal pricing models to assist us in determining estimated~~ fair ~~values. Our internal pricing model incorporates cash flows for each security based on projected losses discounted using a liquidity risk premium that~~ market ~~participant~~value ~~would demand because~~ of the inherent uncertainty in the cash flows. The risk premium is reflective of an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. Determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions if there has been a significant decrease in volume or level of activity for these securities ~~depends~~is ~~on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. We weigh the indications of fair value resulting from multiple valuation techniques~~$2, considering both an income approach such as our internal pricing model and a market approach that provides estimates of fair value from the pricing service and non-binding quotes from market participants. Based on these indications132, we consider the reasonableness of the range of estimates to determine the point within the range that is more representative of fair value under current market conditions. We select a fair value estimate based on professional judgment utilizing a weighting or blending of internal pricing models000, ~~the~~which ~~fair~~represents ~~value~~approximately ~~provided~~1% ~~by the pricing service and non-binding indications. This is consistent with FASB ASC 820-10 and is appropriate in determining the fair value when the volume or level~~ of ~~activity~~our ~~has~~investment ~~decreased in markets that are not orderly~~portfolio.

As a result of this review, as of June 30, 2010, we have classified as Level 3 pricing five non-agency CMOs (4 Alt-A CMOs and 1 non-agency CMO with 2006 origination years) and one non-publicly traded equity security. The total fair market value of these securities is $2,446,000, which represents approximately 1% of our investment portfolio.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our financial instruments for fair value measurements made using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2010
	September 30, 2010		September 30, 2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,~~549~~446	$	2,106
Total gains or losses realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)		70(281)		~~112~~(169)
Included in other comprehensive income		~~(36)~~23		3962
Purchases, issuances, and settlements		(~~137~~56)		(~~231~~287)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-		420
Balance at end of period	$	2,~~446~~132	$	2,~~446~~132
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2010	$	(2)	$	(3)
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at September 30, 2010	$	(337)	$	(340)
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the period are reported in net realized investment gains (losses) as follows:
Total gains or losses included in earnings for the period (above)	$	(2337)	$	(3340)
Change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets held at end of period	$	~~(36)~~23	$	326

AsIncluded ~~included~~ in the table above, a net of $420,000 was transferred into Level 3 from Level 2 during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. This is the result of one transfer with a fair value of $690,000 and one transfer out with a fair value of $270,000. These transfers are the result of changes in pricing due to market data becoming more or less observable since December 31, 2009. The updated pricing information is based on a current review as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 of all the various methods described above for Levels 2 and 3.

We attempt to apply consistent methods and techniques utilized to determine fair value for these securities; however, assumptions regarding delinquency levels and default rates, realized losses and projected timing of those losses and prepayment speeds may vary significantly, especially over time, an could materially impact valuations. For example, we recognized a realized loss of $2,000 and $3,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as a result of valuing these securities based on Level 3 pricing assumptions. However, had we selected our pricing based on Level 2 pricing assumptions, we would have recorded no realized losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and we would have increased our fixed maturities, available-for-sale and accumulated, OCI by $1,027,000 as of June 30, 2010 based on higher pricing assumptions.19

InWe ~~addition~~attempt to ~~the~~apply ~~above~~consistent ~~assets,~~methods weand ~~also~~techniques ~~have~~utilized ~~other~~to ~~financial~~determine ~~assets,~~fair ~~including~~value afor ~~structured~~these ~~annuity~~securities; ~~classified~~however, asassumptions ~~other~~regarding ~~invested~~delinquency ~~assets~~levels and adefault ~~financial~~rates, ~~liability~~realized ~~for~~losses ~~our~~and ~~mandatorily~~projected ~~redeemable~~timing ~~preferred~~of ~~stock,~~those ~~that~~losses ~~are~~and ~~not~~prepayment ~~carried~~speeds atmay ~~fair~~vary ~~market~~significantly, ~~value.~~especially Atover ~~June 30~~time, ~~2010,~~and ~~the~~could ~~structured~~materially ~~annuity~~impact ~~has~~valuations. For example, we recognized a ~~book~~realized ~~value~~loss of $1337,~~570~~000 and $340,000 for the three and anine ~~fair~~months ~~market~~ended ~~value~~September of30, $12010,~~732~~ respectively,~~000~~ as a result of valuing these securities based on Level 3 pricing assumptions. ~~The~~However, ~~mandatorily~~had ~~redeemable~~we ~~preferred~~selected ~~stock~~our ~~has~~pricing abased ~~book~~on ~~value~~Level of2 pricing assumptions, we would have recorded $5430,~~576~~000 and $433,000 realized losses for the three and anine ~~fair~~months ~~market~~ended ~~value~~September of30, $52010,~~086,000.~~ ~~The~~respectively ~~fair~~and ~~market~~we ~~estimates~~would ~~were~~have ~~based~~increased onour anfixed ~~evaluation~~maturities, ofavailable-for-sale ~~similar~~and ~~securities~~accumulated, ~~with~~OCI ~~like~~by ~~terms~~$998,000 ~~and~~as ~~estimated~~of ~~credit~~September ~~risk~~30, 2010 based on higher pricing assumptions.

7In addition to the above assets, we also have other financial assets, including a structured annuity classified as other invested assets that is not carried at fair market value. At September 30, 2010, the structured annuity has a book value of $1,590,000 and a fair market value of $1,750,000. The fair market value estimate is based on an evaluation of similar securities with like terms and estimated credit risk.

Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense

The reserve for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses represents the estimated liability for unpaid claims reported to us, plus claims incurred but not reported and the related estimated loss adjustment expenses. The reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses is determined based on our actual experience, available industry data and projections as to future claims frequency, severity, inflationary trends and settlement patterns.

We write medical malpractice insurance policies which have a lengthy period for reporting a claim (long-tail) and a long process of litigating a claim through the courts and whose risk factors expose its reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses to significant variability. These conditions subject our insurance subsidiary’s open reported claims and incurred but not reported claims to increases due to inflation, changes in legal proceedings and changes in the law. While the anticipated effects of inflation is implicitly considered when estimating reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, an increase in average severity of claims is caused by a number of factors. Future average severities are projected based on historical trends adjusted for changes in underwriting standards, policy provisions and general economic trends. Those anticipated trends are monitored based on actual experience and are modified as necessary to reflect any changes in the development of ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses. These specific risks, combined with the variability that is inherent in any reserve estimate, could result in significant adverse deviation from our carried reserve amounts. The ultimate resolution of claims is subject to considerable uncertainty. Actual developments will likely vary, perhaps significantly, from the current estimated amounts reflected in the accompanying financial statements. We believe the reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses are reasonably stated as of September 30, 2010.

We recorded $16,043,000 for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, which included $35,870,000 for the current accident year and was reduced by $19,827,000 of favorable development for prior report years. The favorable development was the result of reductions in our estimates of ultimate loss costs for the 2006 through 2009 accident years as compared to prior period estimates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded $19,339,000 for losses and loss adjustment expenses, which included $33,699,000 for the 2009 accident year, reduced by $14,360,000 of favorable development for prior accident years. The favorable development was the result of reductions in ultimate loss costs for the 2002 through 2008 accident years as compared to prior period estimates. The favorable development experienced during these periods noted above was the result of better than expected trends in paid loss severity (i.e. the expected average cost of claims) and a lower number of claims actually closed with indemnity than anticipated. The 2010 accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses increased by $2,171,000 to $35,870,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $33,699,000 for the 2009 accident year due to a 3% increase in policyholder headcount from 6,401 as of September 30, 2009 to 6,619 as of September 30, 2010 resulting in additional loss exposures over this time period and our recent entry into new geographic markets with a shift to higher policy limits.

We write medical malpractice insurance policies which have a lengthy period for reporting a claim (long-tail) and a long process of litigating a claim through the courts and whose risk factors expose its reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses to significant variability7. These conditions subject our insurance subsidiary’s open reported claims and incurred but not reported claims to increases due to inflation, changes in legal proceedings and changes in the law. While the anticipated effects of inflation is implicitly considered when estimating reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, an increase in average severity of claims is caused by a number of factors. Future average severities are projected based on historical trends adjusted for changes in underwriting standards, policy provisions and general economic trends. Those anticipated trends are monitored based on actual experience and are modified as necessary to reflect any changes in the development of ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses. These specific risks, combined with the variability that is inherent in any reserve estimate, could result in significant adverse deviation from our carried reserve amounts. The ultimate resolution of claims is subject to considerable uncertainty. Actual developments will likely vary, perhaps significantly, from the current estimated amounts reflected in the accompanying financial statements. We believe the reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses are reasonably stated as of June 30, 2010.

We recorded $11,815,000 for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010, which included $24,558,000 for the current accident year and was reduced by $12,743,000 of favorable development for prior report years. The favorable development was the result of reductions in our estimates of ultimate loss costs for the 2006 through 2009 accident years as compared to prior period estimates. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded $12,918,000 for losses and loss adjustment expenses, which included $22,516,000 for the 2009 accident year, reduced by $9,598,000 of favorable development for prior accident years. The favorable development was the result of reductions in ultimate loss costs for the 2002 through 2008 accident years as compared to prior period estimates. The favorable development experienced during these periods noted above was the result of better than expected trends in paid loss severity (i.e. the expected average cost of claims) and a lower number of claims actually closed with indemnity than anticipated. The 2010 accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses increased by $2,042,000 to $24,558,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $22,516,000 for the 2009 accident year due to an 8% increase in policyholder headcount from 6,268 as of June 30, 2009 to 6,783 as of June 30, 2010 resulting in additional loss exposures over this time period; higher reinsurance retention levels; and our recent entry into new geographic markets with a shift to higher policy limits.

Reinsurance

Reinsurance Premiums Ceded. Certain premiums are ceded to other insurance companies under reinsurance agreements. These reinsurance contracts provide us with increased capacity to write additional risk and the ability to write specific risks within our capital resources and underwriting guidelines. The 2010 reinsurance agreement is a fixed-rated treaty and provides 100% coverage in excess of our retention of $750,000 up to $1,000,000 with an additional retention of 10% of claims for policy limits that are greater than $1,000,000 with no aggregate limit. The 2009 reinsurance agreement is a fixed-rated treaty and provides 100% coverage in excess of our retention of $1,000,000 with a $5,000,000 aggregate limit. Prior to 2009, our insurance subsidiary, American Physicians Insurance Company (“API”) entered into reinsurance contracts, which provided for losses in excess of the retention of $250,000 on individual claims and beginning in 2002 through 2005, $350,000 on multiple insured claims related to a single occurrence. The 2006, 2007 and 2008 reinsurance treaties provide for these same terms with API retaining an additional 10%, 20% and 40% of the risk above the aforementioned retention levels for 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

21The reinsurance contracts for 2002 through 2008 contain variable premium ceding rates based on loss experience. The ceded premium charged under these contracts is dependent upon the development of ultimate losses ceded to the reinsurers under their retrospective treaties. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded favorable development to ceded premiums of $290,000 and $1,067,000, respectively, primarily due to adjustments to treaty years 2002 through 2003 and 2006 through 2008. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded favorable development to ceded premiums of $1,197,000 and $2,877,000, respectively, primarily due to adjustments to treaty years 2002, 2006 and 2007. These adjustments reflect reductions in our estimates of ultimate claims severity and loss experience as a result of claims closures at less than reserved amounts driven by better than expected trends in claims severity coupled with relatively stable payment patterns in the reinsurance layer.

~~The~~In ~~reinsurance~~addition ~~contracts~~to ~~for~~an ~~2002~~adjustment ~~through~~to ~~2008~~premiums ~~contain~~ceded, ~~variable~~estimates ~~premium~~of ~~ceding~~ultimate ~~rates~~reinsurance ~~based~~ceded onpremium ~~loss~~amounts ~~experience.~~compared ~~The~~to ~~ceded~~the ~~premium~~amounts ~~charged~~paid ~~under~~on ~~these~~a ~~contracts~~provisional isbasis ~~dependent~~for ~~upon~~ the ~~development~~2002 ofthrough ~~ultimate~~2008 ~~losses~~reinsurance ~~ceded~~treaties togive ~~the~~rise ~~reinsurers~~to ~~under~~a ~~their~~balance ~~retrospective~~sheet ~~treaties.~~asset ~~For~~classified ~~the~~as ~~three~~“Other ~~and~~Amounts ~~six~~Receivable ~~months~~Under ~~ended~~Reinsurance ~~June~~Contracts” ~~30,~~or ~~2010,~~a webalance ~~recorded~~sheet ~~favorable~~liability ~~development~~classified toas ~~ceded~~“Funds ~~premiums~~Held ofUnder ~~$413,000~~Reinsurance ~~and~~Treaties.” ~~$777~~Furthermore,~~000,~~ ~~respectively,~~each ~~primarily~~retrospective ~~due~~treaty torequires ~~adjustments~~a to24 ~~treaty~~or ~~years~~36 ~~2002~~month ~~through~~holding ~~2003~~period ~~and~~before ~~2006~~any ~~through~~premium ~~2008.~~adjustments ~~For~~or ~~the~~cash ~~three~~can ~~and~~be ~~six~~returned ~~months~~or ~~ended~~paid. ~~June~~The ~~30,~~ultimate ~~2009,~~settlement weamount ~~recorded~~is ~~favorable~~not ~~development~~determined tountil ~~ceded~~all ~~premiums~~losses ofhave ~~$848,000~~been ~~and~~settled ~~$1,680,000,~~under ~~respectively,~~the ~~primarily~~respective ~~due~~treaties. toAs ~~adjustments~~of toSeptember ~~treaty~~30, ~~years 2003~~2010, ~~2006~~we ~~and~~recorded ~~2008.~~a ~~These~~balance ~~adjustments~~sheet ~~reflect~~liability, ~~reductions~~“Funds inHeld ~~our~~Under ~~estimates~~Reinsurance Treaties” of ~~ultimate~~$2,410,000, ~~claims~~which ~~severity~~represents ~~and~~the ~~loss~~difference ~~experience~~between asthe aestimates ~~result~~ of ~~claims~~ultimate ~~closures~~reinsurance atpremiums ~~less~~ceded ~~than reserved~~ amounts ~~driven~~for bythe ~~better~~2002 ~~than~~through ~~expected~~2008 ~~trends~~treaty inyears ~~claims~~and ~~severity~~the ~~coupled~~amounts ~~with~~paid ~~relatively~~on ~~stable~~a ~~payment~~provisional ~~patterns in the reinsurance layer~~basis.

InReinsurance ~~addition~~Recoverables. toCeded anreserves ~~adjustment~~for toloss ~~premiums~~and ~~ceded,~~loss ~~estimates~~adjustment ofexpenses ~~ultimate~~are ~~reinsurance~~recorded ~~ceded~~as ~~premium~~reinsurance ~~amounts~~recoverables. ~~compared~~Reinsurance torecoverables are the ~~amounts~~estimated ~~paid~~amount onof afuture ~~provisional~~loss ~~basis~~payments ~~for~~that ~~the~~will ~~2002~~be ~~through~~recovered ~~2008~~from ~~reinsurance~~reinsurers, ~~treaties~~and ~~give~~represent ~~rise~~the toportion aof ~~balance~~losses ~~sheet~~incurred ~~asset~~during ~~classified~~the asperiod ~~“Other~~that ~~Amounts~~are ~~Receivable~~estimated ~~Under~~to ~~Reinsurance~~be ~~Contracts”~~allocable orto areinsurers. ~~balance~~There ~~sheet~~are ~~liability~~several ~~classified~~factors asthat ~~“Funds~~can ~~Held~~directly ~~Under~~affect ~~Reinsurance~~the ~~Treaties.”~~ability ~~Furthermore,~~to ~~each~~accurately ~~retrospective~~forecast ~~treaty~~the ~~requires~~reinsurance arecoverables. ~~24-~~Many orof ~~36-month~~the ~~holding~~factors ~~period~~discussed ~~before~~in ~~any~~Note ~~premium~~6 ~~adjustments~~related orto ~~cash~~the ~~can~~sensitivities beof ~~returned~~forecasting ortotal ~~paid.~~loss ~~The~~and ~~ultimate~~loss ~~settlement~~adjustment ~~amount~~expense isreserves ~~not~~also ~~determined~~apply ~~until~~when ~~all~~analyzing ~~losses~~reinsurance ~~have~~recoverables. ~~been~~Since ~~settled~~we ~~under~~cede ~~the~~excess ~~respective~~losses ~~treaties.~~above As$250,000 ofon ~~June~~individual ~~30,~~claims ~~2010~~and $350,000 weon ~~recorded~~multiple ainsured ~~balance~~claims ~~sheet~~for ~~liability,~~treaty ~~“Funds~~years ~~Held~~2002 ~~Under~~through ~~Reinsurance~~2008, ~~Treaties”~~the oftrends ~~$2,700,000,~~related ~~which~~to ~~represents~~severity ~~the~~significantly ~~difference~~affect ~~between~~this ~~the~~estimate. ~~estimates~~Current ofindividual ~~ultimate~~claims ~~reinsurance~~severity ~~premiums~~can ~~ceded~~be ~~amounts~~above ~~for~~or ~~the~~fall ~~2002~~below ~~through~~our ~~2008~~retention ~~treaty~~level ~~years~~over ~~and~~ the ~~amounts~~period ~~paid~~it ontakes ato ~~provisional~~resolve ~~basis.~~a claim.

Reinsurance Recoverables. Ceded reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses are recorded as reinsurance recoverables. Reinsurance recoverables are the estimated amount of future loss payments that will be recovered from reinsurers, and represent the portion of losses incurred during the period that are estimated to be allocable to reinsurers. There are several factors that can directly affect the ability to accurately forecast the reinsurance recoverables. Many of the factors discussed in Note 7 related to the sensitivities of forecasting total loss and loss adjustment expense reserves also apply when analyzing reinsurance recoverables. Since we cede excess losses above $250,000 on individual claims and $350,000 on multiple insured claims for treaty years 2002 through 2008, the trends related to severity significantly affect this estimate. Current individual claims severity can be above or fall below our retention level over the period it takes to resolve a claim.

Similar to the estimate for reserves, due to the long-tailed nature of the medical professional liability line of insurance, relatively small changes in the actuarial assumptions for trends, inflation, severity and frequency for projected ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense reserves can have a greater impact on the recorded balance for reinsurance recoverables than with most other property and casualty insurance lines. While we believe that our estimate for ultimate projected losses related to loss and loss adjustment expense is adequate based on reported and open claim counts, there can be no assurance that additional significant reserve enhancements will not be necessary in the future given the many variables inherent in such estimates and the extended period of time that it can take for claim patterns to emerge.

Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us from our obligations to policyholders. We continually monitor our reinsurers to minimize our exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies. Any amount found to be uncollectible is written off in the period in which the uncollectible amount is identified.

~~Unsecured reinsurance recoverables at June 30, 2010 that exceeded 10% of total reinsurance paid and unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses are summarized below (in thousands):~~21

Company Name	June 30, 2010
Swiss Reinsurance	$	1,825
Transatlantic Reinsurance		1,759
ACE Tempest Re USA		1,311
Hannover Ruckversicherrungs		826
General Reinsurance Corp		773

Unsecured reinsurance recoverables at September 30, 2010 that exceeded 10% of total reinsurance paid and unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses are summarized below (in thousands):


Company Name	September 30, 2010
Swiss Reinsurance	$	1,782
Transatlantic Reinsurance		1,613
ACE Tempest Re USA		1,124
General Reinsurance Corp		1,058
Hannover Ruckversicherrungs		789

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ACE Tempest Re USA was A.M. Best rated “A+” (Superior). Swiss Reinsurance (“Swiss Re”), Transatlantic Reinsurance (“Transatlantic”) and Hannover Ruckversicherrungs (“Hannover”) were A.M. Best rated “A” (Excellent). To date, all of our reinsurers have continued to reimburse us for paid claims in a manner consistent with past practices and contractual obligations.

The reinsurers on the 2010 treaty include Hannover, Transatlantic and General Reinsurance Corporation (“General Re”). General Re is A.M. Best rated “A++” (Superior) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, all of API’s reinsurance contracts were with companies in adequate financial condition and we believe there was not any need to establish an allowance for doubtful reinsurance recoverable. We have not experienced any ~~material~~ problems collecting from our reinsurers.

98.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is based on amounts reported in the statements of income after exclusion of nontaxable income such as interest on state and municipal securities. Also, certain items of income and expenses are recognized in different time periods for financial statement purposes than for income tax purposes. Thus, provisions for deferred taxes are recorded in recognition of such temporary differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Consolidated income tax expense is allocated on the basis of each company's income adjusted for permanent differences.

Our effective income tax rate for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was approximately 3339.9% and 36.0%, respectively. Our effective income tax rate for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 was approximately 3533.64% and 3534.04%, respectively. The increase in our effective tax rate for 2010 is due to non-deductible costs related to the proposed merger with ProAssurance.

Redeemable Preferred Stock

In conjunction with the acquisition of API we issued 10,198 shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock (the “redeemable preferred stock”), par value $1.00 per share, from the 10,500 shares authorized. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement we have entered into with ProAssurance Corporation, as described more fully below in Note 15. Business Combination, we agreed to redeem all issued and outstanding shares of the redeemable preferred stock. On September 24, 2010, all issued and outstanding shares of the redeemable preferred stock were redeemed. The redemption price for each share of redeemable preferred stock was $1,000 per share, plus a dividend of $16.11 per share for the period from March 12, 2010 through September 24, 2010.

Prior to the September 24, 2010 redemption of the redeemable preferred stock, holders of redeemable preferred shares were entitled to cumulative dividends thereon at the rate of three percent (3%) per annum payable on the remaining redemption value per share, in priority to the payments of dividends on the common shares. Holders of redeemable preferred shares had no preemptive rights and had the same voting rights as the holders of our common stock. The shares were non-certificated and mandatorily redeemable. Prior to the September 24, 2010 redemption, they were redeemed ratably at not less than $1,000,000 per year, with all remaining outstanding shares being required to be redeemed by December 31, 2016. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, 1,075, 1,104 and 1,019 shares of redeemable preferred stock were redeemed for $1,230,000, $1,368,000 and $1,058,000, which included dividends of $177,000, $297,000 and $40,000, respectively. Prior to the September 24, 2010 redemption, in the event of any liquidation, the holders of redeemable preferred stock would have received an amount equal to the remaining redemption value before any distribution is made to the holders of our common stock.

Prior to the September 24, 2010 redemption, we classified our redeemable preferred stock as a liability because it constituted an unconditional obligation that required us to redeem the shares at a specified or determinable date and therefore, the redeemable preferred stock dividend had been classified as interest expense.

10.

Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock

In conjunction with the acquisition of API we issued 10,198 shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, from the 10,500 shares authorized. Holders of Series A redeemable preferred stock are entitled to cumulative dividends thereon at the rate of three percent (3%) per annum payable on the remaining redemption value per share, in priority to the payments of dividends on the common shares. Holders of our Series A redeemable preferred stock have no preemptive rights and have the same voting rights as the holders of our common stock. The shares are non-certificated and mandatorily redeemable. They will be redeemed ratably at not less than $1,000,000 per year, with all remaining outstanding shares being redeemed by December 31, 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, 1,050 shares of our Series A redeemable preferred stock were redeemed from our preferred shareholders for $1,260,000, which included accrued dividends of $209,000. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, 1,075, 1,104 and 1,019 shares of our Series A redeemable preferred stock were redeemed for $1,230,000, $1,368,000 and $1,058,000, which included dividends of $177,000, $297,000 and $40,000, respectively. In the event of any liquidation, the holders of our Series A redeemable preferred stock receive an amount equal to the remaining redemption value before any distribution is made to the holders of our common stock.

We classify our redeemable preferred stock as a liability because it constitutes an unconditional obligation that requires us to redeem the shares at a specified or determinable date and therefore, the preferred stock dividend has been classified as interest expense.

11.

Stock-Based Compensation

We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock-based awards. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we recorded compensation cost related to stock options of $~~115~~139,000 and $~~226~~365,000, respectively, and a related reduction in income taxes of $4049,000 and $79128,000, respectively. The compensation cost is the total fair value, at date of grant, of stock options that vested during the period. No compensation costs were capitalized in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, 2029,000 options were exercised with an intrinsic value of $~~244~~426,000. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, 4372,000 options were exercised with an intrinsic value of $~~527~~953,000. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we received cash proceeds of $~~115~~352,000 and $~~347~~699,000, respectively, and we received $~~118,000~~0 and $199,000, respectively, in value through cashless exercises/exchanges for the options exercised. Also, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there was $~~830~~691,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested shares under our 2005 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"), which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.43 years.

The Stock Option Plan provides for the issuance of up to 1,250,000 shares of common stock to our employees, including officers and directors and non-employee directors. A total of 1,052,000 of these options have been granted as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 198,000 are available for grants. Of those granted, ~~171~~200,000 shares have been exercised, ~~503~~529,000 options are exercisable and ~~378~~323,000 are not yet exercisable.

~~The~~No ~~exercise~~stock ~~price~~options ~~for~~were ~~each~~granted ~~non-qualified~~during ~~option share is determined by~~ the ~~Compensation~~three ~~Committee~~months ofended ~~the~~September ~~Board of Directors (the “Committee”). Under the Stock Option Plan~~30, ~~option grants are limited to a maximum of ten-year terms; however, the Committee has issued all currently outstanding grants with five-year terms~~2010. ~~The Committee also determines vesting for each option grant and traditionally has had options vest in two to three approximately equal annual installments beginning one year from the date of grant.~~ Presented below is a summary of the stock options held by our employees and our directors and the related transactions for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010				Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price			Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance at April 1	751,000	$	18.01	Balance at January 1	774,000	$	17.87
Balance at July 1	881,000	$	19.20	Balance at January 1	774,000	$	17.87
Options granted	~~150,000~~-		~~24.15~~-	Options granted	150,000		24.15
Options exercised	2029,000		1112.8313	Options exercised	4372,000		12.7445
Options forfeited/expired	-		-	Options forfeited/expired	-		-
Balance at June 30	881,000		19.20	Balance at June 30	881,000		19.20
Balance at September 30	852,000		19.44	Balance at September 30	852,000		19.44
Options exercisable	~~503~~529,000		1617.5519	Options exercisable	~~503~~529,000		1617.5519

The following table summarizes our outstanding and exercisable options at ~~June~~September 30, 2010:

Stock Options Outstanding						Stock Options Exercisable
Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)		Average Remaining Contractual Life	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)		Average Remaining Contractual Life
881,000	$	19.20	$	4,629,000	2.9	503,000	$	16.55	$	3,973,000	1.8
852,000	$	19.44	$	11,002,000	2.7	529,000	$	17.19	$	8,017,000	1.8
(1) Based on the $24.45 closing price of our stock at June 30, 2010.
(1) Based on the $32.35 closing price of our stock at September 30, 2010.

2411.

12.

Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

We are obligated under certain operating lease arrangements for our office space. The leases expire in 2011. The remaining contractual obligations for these leases are $~~353~~181,000 and $~~692~~702,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

Discontinued Operations

We ceased all operations within our Financial Services segment during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. In connection with the exit from this business segment, we have ongoing lease and early termination costs and other contractual obligations for which we will be responsible. In accordance with ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, we have accrued a fair value estimate of these anticipated costs of approximately $315,000 within our unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet presented herein. Please see Note 14 below for a more detailed discussion of our discontinued operations.

Litigation and Regulatory Inquiries

We are involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory inquiries that have arisen out of the conduct of our business.

~~During~~As ~~the~~previously ~~second~~disclosed, in the quarter ended September 30, 2010, APS Financial Corporation (“APS Financial”), the ~~Company’s~~ broker-dealer subsidiary of American Physicians Service Group, ~~received~~Inc., asettled ~~notice~~an ~~from~~ongoing investigation by the staff of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) ~~indicating~~concerning ~~that the FINRA staff had made a preliminary determination to recommend disciplinary action against the broker-dealer. The~~ allegations ~~were~~ that, in 2005 and 2006, APS Financial charged excessive markups in 6059 transactions, out of approximately 2,000 transactions conducted during the time period. FINRA’s allegations were that approximately $1.27 million of excessive markups were charged on these 59 transactions. WeTo ~~are~~resolve ~~currently~~the ininvestigation, ~~discussions~~APS ~~with~~Financial and FINRA toentered ~~resolve~~into ~~this~~a ~~proposed~~Letter ~~disciplinary~~of ~~action~~Acceptance, Waiver and doConsent, ~~not~~effective ~~anticipate~~August ~~this~~26, ~~will~~2010 ~~have~~(the a“FINRA ~~material~~Consent ~~impact~~Order”), onpursuant ~~our~~to ~~consolidated~~which ~~financial~~APS ~~position~~Financial, ~~results~~without admitting any allegation against it, agreed to permanently surrender its license to conduct business as a broker-dealer in exchange for termination of ~~operation~~the proposed disciplinary action. APS Financial was not required to pay any fines, penalties or ~~cash~~other ~~flows~~amounts as a result of the settlement.

~~Certain~~As ofpreviously ~~our~~disclosed ~~financial~~in ~~services~~the ~~subsidiaries~~Company’s ~~are~~Quarterly ~~also~~Report ~~parties~~on toForm a10-Q ~~FINRA~~for ~~arbitration~~the ~~proceeding~~quarter ~~initiated~~ended byJune ~~family~~30, ~~members~~2010, ofprior ato ~~former~~receiving ~~client~~the ofFINRA ~~APS~~Consent ~~Financial~~Order, ~~and~~the ~~another~~company ~~financial~~had ~~services~~already ~~subsidiary,~~begun ~~APS~~making ~~Capital~~plans ~~Corp.~~to ~~(“APS~~discontinue ~~Capital”),~~the ~~who~~operations ~~allege~~of ~~that~~ APS Financial ~~made unsuitable investment recommendations to the former client~~. The ~~allegations~~cessation ~~also~~of ~~name~~operations ~~the~~of ~~parent~~our ~~companies~~Financial ~~and~~Services ansegment ~~employee~~is ofnot ~~APS~~expected ~~Financial. This~~to ~~matter~~have isa ~~still~~material ineffect ~~the~~on ~~preliminary~~our ~~stages. We~~consolidated ~~intend~~financial toposition, ~~vigorously~~results ~~defend~~of ~~our~~operation ~~position~~or incash ~~this case~~flows.

Certain of our Financial Services subsidiaries are also parties to a FINRA arbitration proceeding initiated by family members of a former client of APS Financial and another Financial Services subsidiary, APS Capital Corp. (“APS Capital”), who allege that APS Financial made unsuitable investment recommendations to the former client. The allegations also name the parent companies and an employee of APS Financial. This matter is still in the preliminary stages. We intend to vigorously defend our position in this case.

APS Capital is currently party to litigation regarding a disputed bankruptcy trade claim.

The Company, ProAssurance Corporation, CA Bridge Corporation and certain of the Company’s officers and directors are party to a shareholder derivative action filed in reaction to the announcement of our proposed merger with ProAssurance Corporation. We believe this lawsuit is entirely without merit and we intend to vigorously defend our position in this case.

While we cannot predict the outcome of any pending or future claim, legal action or regulatory inquiry or enforcement action, and although no assurances can be given, we do not believe that any pending matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

2524

1312.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average shares outstanding without any dilutive effects considered. Diluted earnings per share reflect dilution from all contingently issuable shares, such as options. A reconciliation of income and weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted income per share from operations follows:

(in thousands except share data)	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands except per share data)	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Numerator for basic and diluted income per common share:
Net income	$	6,200	$	4,921	$	10,728	$	9,651
Net income from continuing operations	$	5,102	$	6,262	$	15,997	$	15,795
Net income (loss)from discontinued operations		(200)		180		(367)		298
Net income	$	4,902	$	6,442	$	15,630	$	16,093
Denominator:
Denominator for basic income per common share - weighted average shares outstanding		6,~~813~~782		6,~~923~~891		6,~~835~~817		6,~~958~~936
Effect of dilutive stock options and awards		~~110~~154		8498		~~115~~133		~~131~~137
Denominator for diluted income per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding		6,~~923~~936		76,~~007~~989		6,950		7,~~089~~073
Net income - basic	$	0.91	$	0.71	$	1.57	$	1.39
Net income from continuing operations- basic	$	0.75	$	0.91	$	2.35	$	2.28
Net income - diluted	$	0.90	$	0.70	$	1.54	$	1.36
Net income (loss)from discontinued operations- basic		(0.03)		0.02		(0.06)		0.04
Net income - basic	$	0.72	$	0.93	$	2.29	$	2.32
Net income from continuing operations- diluted	$	0.74	$	0.90	$	2.30	$	2.23
Net income (loss)from discontinued operations- diluted		(0.03)		0.02		(0.05)		0.05
Net income - diluted	$	0.71	$	0.92	$	2.25	$	2.28

13.

Segment Information

The Company’s segments are distinct by type of service provided. Comparative financial data for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Operating Revenues from Continuing Operations
Insurance services	$	17,880	$	19,526	$	54,251	$	54,618
All other		3,669		2,345		9,524		7,927
Total segment revenues	$	21,549	$	21,871	$	63,775	$	62,545

Reconciliation to Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Total segment revenues	$	21,549	$	21,871	$	63,775	$	62,545
Less: intercompany interest and dividends		(3,216)		(1,943)		(8,390)		(6,735)
Total revenues	$	18,333	$	19,928	$	55,385	$	55,810

Operating Income:
Insurance services	$	10,905	$	10,356	$	29,758	$	26,660
All other		(2,411)		(955)		(4,780)		(2,595)
Total segment operating income	$	8,494	$	9,401	$	24,978	$	24,065

Income tax expense (benefit):
Insurance services	$	3,773	$	3,423	$	10,149	$	9,173
All other		(381)		(284)		(1,168)		(903)
Total segment income tax expense (benefit)	$	3,392	$	3,139	$	8,981	$	8,270

Capital expenditures:
Insurance services	$	50	$	68	$	200	$	232
All other		-		3		52		7
Total segment capital expenditures	$	50	$	71	$	252	$	239

Depreciation/amortization expenses:
Insurance services	$	72	$	63	$	213	$	264
All other		34		42		101		96
Total segment depreciation/amortization expenses:	$	106	$	105	$	314	$	360

Discontinued Operations:
Financial services revenues		996		2,439		4,700		5,909
Financial services operating income (loss)		(309)		280		(565)		474
Financial services income tax expense (benefit)		(109)		100		(198)		176
Financial services capital expenditures		(19)		1		(1)		3
Financial services depreciation/amortization		(12)		13		1		24


Balance sheet data:	September 30,		December 31,
		2010		2009
Identifiable assets
Insurance services	$	256,916	$	247,358
All other		50,954		52,414
Total segment assets	$	307,870	$	299,772

14.

~~Segment~~Discontinued ~~Information~~ Operations

As discussed in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, we discontinued all operations within our Financial Services segment during the current quarter ended September 30, 2010. The ~~Company’s~~discontinuation ~~segments~~occurred ~~are~~in ~~distinct~~connection with APS Financial entering into the FINRA Consent Order, pursuant to which APS Financial, without admitting any allegation against it, agreed to permanently surrender its license to conduct business as a broker-dealer in exchange for termination of the proposed disciplinary action. The FINRA Consent Order became effective on August 26, 2010, at which time we discontinued our APS Financial operations as a licensed broker-dealer. The broker-dealer operation conducted by ~~type~~APS Financial constituted a significant majority of ~~service~~our ~~provided~~Financial Services business. Accordingly, ~~Comparative~~on ~~financial~~August ~~data~~26, ~~for~~2010, we also discontinued the ~~three~~day-to-day operations of our bank debt and ~~six~~trade ~~month~~claims ~~periods~~subsidiary, ~~ended~~APS ~~June~~Capital 30Corp. (“APS Capital”). Separately, on August 12, 2010, our remaining Financial Services subsidiary, APS Asset Management, Inc. (“APSAM”) was sold and ~~2009~~our ~~are~~asset ~~shown~~management business was discontinued as ~~follows:~~a result.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Operating Revenues
Insurance services	$	18,246	$	17,813	$	36,371	$	35,092
Financial services		2,147		1,922		3,704		3,470
All other		5,464		5,117		5,855		5,582
Total segment revenues	$	25,857	$	24,852	$	45,930	$	44,144
Reconciliation to Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Total segment revenues	$	25,857	$	24,852	$	45,930	$	44,144
Less: intercompany interest and dividends		(5,116)		(4,731)		(5,174)		(4,792)
Total revenues	$	20,741	$	20,121	$	40,756	$	39,352
Operating Income:
Insurance services	$	10,782	$	8,242	$	18,902	$	16,360
Financial services		(216)		175		(351)		95
All other		(1,190)		(778)		(2,323)		(1,598)
Total segment operating income	$	9,376	$	7,639	$	16,228	$	14,857
Income tax expense (benefit):
Insurance services	$	3,628	$	2,969	$	6,376	$	5,750
Financial services		(74)		67		(122)		41
All other		(378)		(318)		(754)		(585)
Total segment income tax expense (benefit)	$	3,176	$	2,718	$	5,500	$	5,206
Capital expenditures:
Insurance services	$	99	$	87	$	150	$	164
Financial services		8		-		19		2
All other		22		3		52		4
Total segment capital expenditures	$	129	$	90	$	221	$	170
Depreciation/amortization expenses:
Insurance services	$	72	$	85	$	141	$	184
Financial services		6		8		13		16
All other		34		32		67		65
Total segment depreciation/amortization expenses:	$	112	$	125	$	221	$	265
Balance sheet data:	June 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Identifiable assets
Insurance services	$	255,144	$	247,358
Financial services		2,550		4,830
All other		49,542		47,584
Total segment assets	$	307,236	$	299,772

In connection with our exit from the Financial Services business, we have ongoing lease, and early termination costs and other contractual obligations for which we will continue to be responsible. We expect to be able to offset some of these costs and obligations by subleasing the office space formerly occupied by the Financial Services subsidiaries, assigning certain contracts to an unrelated broker-dealer and negotiating with vendors for the early termination of certain other contracts. However, there can be no assurances as to the extent that we will be successful in doing so.

The cessation of operations of our Financial Services business is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In accordance with ASC 205, Discontinued Operations, effective August 26, 2010, the date APS Financial and APS Capital were discontinued, the results of operations are reported as discontinued since the operations of this business segment are eliminated from ongoing operations. Furthermore, on August 12, 2010, APS sold APSAM and, as a result of this sale, the results and operations for the period January 1, 2010 through August 11, 2010 are reported as discontinued operations. For comparative purposes, all prior year reporting periods (three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009) were reclassified to report the results of the Financial Services operations as discontinued as well.

In accordance with ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, a liability for the cost associated with the exit of our Financial Services segment was recorded at fair value as of September 30, 2010. While no one-time termination benefits exist as a result of the exit this business segment, a liability should be recorded for costs to terminate certain contracts before the end of its terms and for costs that will continue to be incurred under certain contracts for the remaining term without economic benefit to APS Financial or APS Capital. In accordance with this guidance, the liability for exiting our Financial Services business shall be measured at its fair value at the cease-use-date for costs that will continue to be incurred under a contract (i.e. run-off costs with future economic benefit) and for costs to terminate a contract before the end of its term (i.e. penalties or other costs for early termination) when an entity gives written notice to the counterparty or has otherwise negotiated a termination with the counterparty. This liability will be recorded based on the estimated remaining lease and other contractual obligations, adjusted for the effects of any prepaid or deferred items recognized, reduced by sublease rentals that can be reasonably obtained even if the entity does not intend to sublease. We recorded an estimated fair value of this liability for discontinued operations of approximately $315,000.

The following table provides operating results from the discontinued operations of our Financial Services segment for the periods indicated:


(in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
REVENUES
Broker dealer	$	801	$	2,233	$	3,843	$	5,333
Bank debt - trade claims		-		76		350		218
Management fees and other income		195		130		507		358
Total revenues		996		2,439		4,700		5,909
EXPENSES
Commissions		516		1,341		2,513		3,109
Payroll related		136		482		952		1,485
Information services		233		126		505		350
Legal and professional		120		38		748		166
Other expenses		300		172		547		325

Total expenses		1,305		2,159		5,265		5,435

Operating income (loss)		(309)		280		(565)		474

Income taxes (benefit)		(109)		100		(198)		176

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(200)	$	180	$	(367)	$	298

15.

~~Subsequent~~Business ~~Events~~Combination

On ~~July~~August 2931, 2010, ~~APS~~we ~~Financial~~entered ~~and~~into ~~its~~an ~~parent,~~Agreement ~~APS~~and ~~Investment~~Plan ~~Services,~~of ~~Inc.~~Merger (the “~~APS~~Merger ~~Investment Services~~Agreement”), ~~entered~~with ~~into~~ProAssurance anCorporation ~~agreement~~(“ProAssurance”) ~~with~~and anCA ~~unaffiliated~~Bridge ~~broker~~Corporation, a wholly-~~dealer~~owned subsidiary of ProAssurance (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which ~~the~~Merger ~~unaffiliated~~Sub ~~broker-dealer~~will ~~agreed~~merge towith ~~hire~~and ~~most~~into ofthe ~~APS~~Company ~~Financial’s~~(the ~~employees~~“Merger”) and ~~assume~~the ~~certain~~Company ~~contractual~~will ~~obligations~~survive ofas ~~APS~~a ~~Financial~~wholly-owned subsidiary of ProAssurance. InAt ~~return~~the effective time of the Merger, ~~APS~~each ~~Financial~~outstanding ~~and~~share ~~APS~~of ~~Investment~~Company ~~Services~~common stock will ~~receive~~be ~~certain~~canceled ~~payments~~and ~~tied~~converted tointo the ~~contractual~~right ~~obligations~~to ~~assumed~~receive ~~and~~payment of $32.50 in cash. The completion of the ~~unaffiliated~~Merger ~~broker-dealer’s~~is ~~future~~subject ~~financial~~to ~~performance~~customary conditions, ~~and~~including, ~~APS~~without ~~Financial~~limitation, ~~plans~~regulatory toand ~~cease~~APS ~~operations~~shareholder asapproval aof ~~broker-dealer~~the Merger.

Prior to entering into this transaction, we had made a preliminary decision to exit our Financial Services business and had been actively marketing the segment for sale. That decision was based on the weak financial performance of our Financial Services business in recent years and concerns that a return to materially improved, sustained financial performance would require more capital than could be produced from the Financial Services segment’s operations. We also plan to discontinue the day-to–day operations of our bank debt and trade claim subsidiary, APS Capital Corp. Our remaining Financial Services subsidiary, APS Asset Management, Inc., will continue to operate until it can be sold or appropriately discontinued.

The cessation of operations of our Financial Services business is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For purposes of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), “APS,” “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to American Physicians Service Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise. The following MD&A should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, included in Part I, Item 1, as well as the audited, consolidated financial statements and notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 3, 2010.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not materialize or prove correct, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including statements: of our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; concerning new products, services or developments; regarding future economic conditions, performance or outlook; as to the outcome of contingencies; of beliefs or expectations; and of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “projects” and similar words or expressions. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation, other than that imposed by law, to update forward-looking statements to reflect further developments or information obtained after the date of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document.

The following important factors, in addition to those referenced under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A and Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2010, could affect the future results of our operations and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements:

•

general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, that are worse than expected;

•

changes in the healthcare industry;

•

regulatory and legislative actions or decisions that adversely affect our business plans or operations;

•

inflation and changes in the interest rate environment, and/or changes in the securities markets including the performance of financial markets affecting the fair value of our investments or making it difficult to determine the value of our investments;

•

uncertainties inherent in the estimate of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves and reinsurance;

•

significantly increased competition among insurance providers;

•

changes in the availability or cost of reinsurance including our ability to renew our existing reinsurance treaty or obtain new reinsurance;

•

failure or inability of our reinsurers to pay claims or amounts due us in a timely manner;

•

loss of key executives, personnel, accounts or customers; ~~and~~

•

potential losses, ~~regulatory enforcement~~ and litigation risk associated with our Financial Services businesses.;

•

any significant delay in the expected completion of the Merger or the failure of the Merger to close for any reason;

•

the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the Merger; and

•

business uncertainty and contractual restrictions that may exist during the pendency of the Merger.

The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and we caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. In addition to any risks and uncertainties specifically identified in the text surrounding forward-looking statements, you should consult our other filings under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented.

Business Overview

We provide ~~(1)~~ insurance services, specifically medical professional liability insurance in Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Colorado ~~and (2) financial services, including brokerage and investment services to individuals and institutions~~.

Insurance Services. We provide medical professional liability insurance primarily in Texas, where our insurance subsidiary has written business for over 33 years. Our insurance subsidiary is authorized to do business in the States of Texas, Arkansas and Oklahoma and was recently also licensed to write business in Colorado. Our insurance subsidiary specializes in writing medical professional liability insurance for physicians and other healthcare providers, including physician extenders and clinical staff. Our insurance subsidiary currently insures over 6,~~700~~600 physicians, dentists, and other healthcare providers, the majority of whom are located in Texas. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, approximately 9091%, 86% and 23% of our premiums were written in Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas, respectively. Colorado written premiums amounted to less than 1% of our total premiums written.

Financial Services. We ~~provide~~discontinued all our Financial Services segment operations during the current quarter ended September 30, 2010. Prior to exiting this business the Financial Services segment provided investment and investment advisory services to institutions and individuals throughout the United States through the following subsidiaries:

APS Financial. APS Financial Corporation (“APS Financial”) iswas a fully licensed broker-dealer that ~~provides~~provided brokerage and investment services primarily to institutional and high net worth individual clients. APS Financial also ~~provides~~provided portfolio accounting, analysis and other services to insurance companies, banks and public funds. We ~~recognize~~recognized commission revenue, and the related compensation expense, on a trade date basis. This business ceased operations in August 2010 and the broker-dealer license was surrendered to FINRA.

APS Capital. APS Capital Corp. iswas dedicated to the clearing and settlement of trades involving non-securities including syndicated bank loans, trade claims and distressed private loan portfolios. We ~~seek~~developed ~~to develop~~ business with clients who ~~trade~~traded in distressed markets. We ~~recognize~~recognized commission revenue, and the related compensation expense, when the transaction iswas complete and fully funded. This business ceased operations in August 2010.

APS Asset Management. APS Asset Management, Inc., was a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, ~~manages~~and managed fixed income and equity assets for institutional and individual clients on a fee basis. We ~~recognize~~recognized fee revenues monthly based on the amount of funds under management. This business was sold in August 2010.

The current and historical financial operations of all three of the Financial Services entities have been recorded as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements included in this current report on Form 10-Q.

Business Combination

On August 31, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with ProAssurance Corporation (“ProAssurance”) and CA Bridge Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ProAssurance (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”) and the Company will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ProAssurance. At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of Company common stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive payment of $32.50 in cash. The completion of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, without limitation, regulatory and APS shareholder approval of the Merger.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. These estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an on-going basis based on historical developments, market conditions, industry trends and other information we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will conform to our estimates and assumptions, or that reported results of operations will not be materially adversely affected by the need to make accounting adjustments to reflect changes in these estimates and assumptions from time to time. Adjustments related to changes in estimates are reflected in our results of operations in the period in which those estimates changed.

Our “critical” accounting policies are those policies that we believe to be most sensitive to estimates and judgments. These policies are more fully described in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in that report. There have been no material changes to these policies since the most recent year end.

Results of Operations

Despite continued pricing pressure in our Insurance Services segment over the last several years, improvements in the terms of our reinsurance contracts coupled with continued favorable prior year reserve development allowed us to deliver solid results from this operating segment for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. As a result of continued favorable development in the claim environment post-tort reform and increased competition, we lowered our rates on renewing business approximately 3% on average during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to approximately 64% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The 2010 reductions were the result of negotiated discounts to retain certain group practices with favorable loss histories. Policyholder retention ~~was~~declined ~~strong~~during the current quarter ended September 30, 2010 as a result of competitive pricing. Policyholder retention for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010 atwas approximately 9186% as compared to 9391% during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009. We have seen continued competition by existing professional liability carriers. Many of these carriers have been aggressive in seeking new business and are willing to compete on price. As a result of this increased competition, we continue to be faced with price pressure on both existing renewals and new business. As a result of these market forces, we expect to continue to face extensive competition throughout the remainder of 2010 and continuing into 2011, but will continue to price insurance products at rates we believe are adequate for the risks assumed.

Furthermore, even though reported claims remain at historically low levels and claim severity payment patterns have been better than anticipated, we increased loss and loss adjustment expenses by $2,~~042~~171,000 to $2435,~~558~~870,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 for the 2010 accident year as compared to $2233,~~516~~699,000 for the 2009 accident year for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. This increase reflects additional policyholders from 6,~~268~~401 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 to 6,~~783~~619 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 resulting in additional loss exposures over this time period; higher reinsurance retention levels; and our recent entry into new geographic markets with a shift to higher policy limits.

Our Financial Services segment, which had returned to profitability in 2009, experienced a loss in the first six months of 2010 even though financial service revenues increased 7% for the six months of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Driving this loss was an increase in expenses primarily related to on-going legal and regulatory disputes. See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein for information about subsequent events affecting our Financial Services business.

The following table sets forth selected historical financial and operating data for the Company. The selected income statement data below for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 is derived from our consolidated unaudited financial statements included herein which management believes incorporate all of the adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for such periods and have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Actual financial results through ~~June~~September 30, 2010 may not be indicative of future financial performance.

Selected Consolidated Financial and

Operating Data of American Physicians Service Group, Inc.

(in thousands, except per share and ratio data)	Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30,				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Income Statement Data:
Gross premiums written	$	1417,~~456~~782	$	1421,~~682~~446	$	3350,~~080~~862	$	3253,~~222~~668
Premiums ceded		(~~104~~243)		~~335~~676		(~~253~~496)		~~663~~1,339
Net premiums written		1417,~~352~~539		1522,~~017~~122		3250,~~827~~366		3255,~~885~~007
Net premiums earned		16,~~071~~142		1617,~~825~~595		3248,~~180~~322		3350,~~282~~877
Investment income, net of investment expenses		2,~~454~~268		2,~~666~~351		46,~~954~~989		57,~~217~~358
Net realized capital gains (losses) and OTTI		~~126~~(110)		(~~1,242~~88)		36(31)		(2,~~524~~597)
Financial services		2,074		1,827		3,514		3,275
Other revenue		33		70		105		172
Other revenue		16		45		72		102
Total revenues		18,333		19,928		55,385		55,810
Total revenues		20,741		20,121		40,756		39,352
Losses and loss adjustment expenses		4,228		6,421		16,043		19,339
Losses and loss adjustment expenses		4,874		6,797		11,815		12,918
Other underwriting expenses		2,804		3,079		8,541		8,866
Other underwriting expenses		2,529		2,510		5,688		5,731
Change in deferred acquisition costs		(57)		(331)		(91)		(248)
Change in deferred acquisition costs		61		264		(34)		83
General and administrative expenses		2,864		1,358		5,914		3,788
Financial services expenses		2,363		1,747		4,055		3,375
Total expenses		9,839		10,527		30,407		31,745
General and administrative expenses		1,538		1,164		3,004		2,388
Income from continuing operations		8,494		9,401		24,978		24,065
Total expenses		11,365		12,482		24,528		24,495
Income tax expense		3,392		3,139		8,981		8,270
Income from operations		9,376		7,639		16,228		14,857
Net income from continuing operations		5,102		6,262		15,997		15,795
Income tax expense		3,176		2,718		5,500		5,206
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		(200)		180		(367)		298
Net income	$	64,~~200~~902	$	46,~~921~~442	$	1015,~~728~~630	$	916,~~651~~093
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		6,~~923~~936		76,~~007~~989		6,950		7,~~089~~073
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.9071	$	0.7092	$	12.5425	$	12.3628
Underwriting Ratios:
Loss ratio (1)
Current accident year		8370%		6863%		7674%		6866%
Prior accident years		-5344%		-2827%		-3941%		-2928%
Calendar year		3026%		4036%		3733%		3938%
Expense ratio (2)		1617%		16%		1817%		17%
Combined ratio (3)		4643%		5651%		5451%		5655%

(1) Loss ratio is defined as the ratio of losses and loss adjustment expenses to net premiums earned.

(2) Expense ratio is defined as the ratio of other underwriting expenses and net change in deferred acquisition costs to net premiums earned.

(3) Combined ratio is the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio.

(in thousands)	~~June~~September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents and investments	$	~~263~~268,~~819~~867	$	259,338
Premiums receivable		1716,~~543~~817		15,678
Reinsurance recoverables		6,~~590~~416		9,682
All other assets		1915,~~284~~770		15,074
Total Assets	$	307,~~236~~870	$	299,772
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	8785,~~721~~842	$	88,668
Unearned premiums		3638,~~988~~385		36,341
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		5,576		6,679
Manditorily redeemable preferred stock		-		6,679
All other liabilities		109,~~361~~810		8,874
Total Liabilities		~~140~~134,~~646~~037		140,562
Total Stockholders' Equity		~~166~~173,~~590~~833		159,210
Total Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity	$	307,~~236~~870	$	299,772

The discussion that follows should be read in connection with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

Condensed income statement data for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

(in thousands except per share data and percentages)	Three Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Revenues	$	2018,~~741~~333	$	2019,~~121~~928	$	~~620~~(1,595)	3-8%
Income from Operations		9,376		7,639		1,737	23%
Net income from continuing operations		5,102		6,262		(1,160)	-19%
Net Income		6,200		4,921		1,279	26%
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		(200)		180		(380)	-211%
Diluted Net Income Per Share	$	0.90	$	0.70	$	0.20	29%
Net Income		4,902		6,442		(1,540)	-24%
Diluted Net Income Per Share	$	0.71	$	0.92	$	(0.21)	-23%

Further explanation for the quarter over quarter variances are described below.

Premium related income statement data for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Gross premiums written	$	1417,~~456~~782	$	1421,~~682~~446	$	(~~226~~3,664)	-217%
Premium ceded:
Current year		(~~517~~533)		(~~513~~521)		(412)	12%
Prior year		~~413~~290		~~848~~1,197		(~~435~~907)	-5176%
Net premiums ceded		(~~104~~243)		~~335~~676		(~~439~~919)	-~~131~~136%
Net premiums earned	$	16,~~071~~142	$	1617,~~825~~595	$	(~~754~~1,453)	-48%

Gross Premiums Written

Gross premiums written decreased $~~226~~3,664,000 (217%) to $1417,~~456~~782,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $1421,~~682~~446,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The primary ~~cause~~causes for this decrease ~~was~~were due to continued rate decreases on renewal business which, on average decreased 3% for the current quarter as a result of competitive pricing pressures, ~~and~~ lower new written business of $~~693~~941,000 for the current year quarter as compared to $~~741~~1,410,000 of new business for the prior year quarter. ~~Policyholder~~and policyholder retention ~~was~~of approximately 9278% for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to 88% for the prior year quarter. We anticipate that we will continue to experience competitive pricing pressures.

Premiums Ceded

Premiums ceded increased $~~439~~919,000 (~~131~~136%) to $(~~104~~243,000) for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $~~335~~676,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The reinsurance contracts we utilized from 2002 through 2008 were variable premium treaties that have various minimum and maximum rates. The actual premium rate is dependent upon the ultimate losses ceded to the reinsurer under the related treaty. The increase in premiums ceded of $~~439~~919,000 is primarily the result of recognizing $~~413~~290,000 in favorable development on these variable premium treaties during the current year quarter as compared to recognizing $~~848~~1,197,000 in favorable development during the prior year quarter. The favorable development reflects reductions in our estimates of claim severity and loss experience as a result of claim closures at less than reserved amounts driven by better than expected trends in claims severity coupled with relatively stable payment patterns in the reinsurance layer. Effective January 1, 2009, we changed our reinsurance treaty such that we retained the first $1,000,000 of any loss occurrence. The 2009 reinsurance contract is a fixed-rated treaty and provides 100% coverage in excess of our retention of $1,000,000 with a $5,000,000 aggregate limit. The 2010 reinsurance agreement is a fixed-rated treaty and provides 100% coverage in excess of our retention of $750,000 up to $1,000,000 with an additional retention of 10% of claims for policy limits that are greater than $1,000,000 with no aggregate limit. We are retaining this additional risk in the reinsurance layer in order to lower our ceding costs based on decreases in claims. Due to the increased retention, the 2009 and 2010 ceded premium rates are lower which resulted in $~~517~~533,000 in 2010 treaty year ceded premiums versus $~~513~~521,000 for the same period in 2009. The 2009 and 2010 treaties provide us with coverage against large losses and multiple claims arising from a single event, as well as excess policy limit coverage. While we anticipate that the 2009 and 2010 treaties will reduce our ceded premiums as a percentage of direct premiums ~~written~~earned, thus resulting in a relative increase in net premiums written and earned, the overall impact on earnings is uncertain as the frequency and severity of losses in future periods is not yet known.

Net Premiums Earned

Net premiums earned decreased by $~~754~~1,453,000 (48%) to $16,~~071~~142,000 from $1617,~~825~~595,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Net earned premiums were lower primarily due to lower favorable development recognized on the 2002 through 2008 variable premium reinsurance treaties during the current quarter as compared to the prior year quarter as well as continued rate decreases, ~~and~~ lower new business written and lower policyholder retention.

Investment Income

Investment income statement data for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Investment income:
Fixed Maturities	$	2,~~306~~260	$	2,~~544~~300	$	(~~238~~40)	-92%
Equity Securities		99100		95119		4(19)	4-16%
Short-term investments and other		5053		6530		~~(15)~~23	~~-23~~77%
Finance charges on premiums receivable		2425		2640		(215)	-838%
Structured annuity		19		18		1	6%
Total investment income	$	2,~~498~~457	$	2,~~748~~507	$	(~~250~~50)	-92%
Investment expense		44189		82156		~~(38)~~33	~~-46~~21%
Net investment income	$	2,~~454~~268	$	2,~~666~~351	$	(~~212~~83)	-84%

Investment income, net of investment expenses, decreased by $~~212~~83,000 (84%) to $2,~~454~~268,000 from $2,~~666~~351,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period for 2009. The proceeds from the sale of approximately $17,288,000 of non-agency CMOs in 2009 and additional cash generated from operations have been reinvested generally in high quality investment grade fixed income securities with short maturity dates and lower yields. We shortened maturities to continue to focus on preservation of principal over yield during the economic crisis. In addition, interest rates on money market funds continue to remain at historically low levels. This rebalancing of our fixed income investment portfolio resulted in a corresponding decrease in investment income for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 even though our investment portfolio continues to grow.

Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses) and Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

~~Realized~~Net realized capital gains and losses ~~income statement~~ data for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Gross realized gains	$	~~247~~394	$	~~122~~298	$	~~125~~96	~~102~~32%
Gross realized (losses)		(6247)		(~~264~~148)		~~202~~101	7768%
Other -than-temporary impairment (losses)		(59457)		(~~1,100~~238)		~~1,041~~(219)	95-92%
Net realized gains (losses) and OTTI	$	~~126~~(110)	$	(~~1,242~~88)	$	~~1,368~~(22)	~~110~~-25%

Net realized capital ~~gains~~losses ~~and~~including other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”) were $~~126~~110,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, as compared to a net loss of $188,~~242,~~000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. OTTI losses ~~decreased~~increased $1219,~~041,~~000 primarily due to ~~the~~additional ~~lower~~ write-downs in OTTI for the current quarter as a result of ~~our~~further ~~reduced~~declines ~~position~~ in non-agency CMOs. ~~and~~The ~~improved~~increase ~~performance~~ in ~~the~~gross ~~equity~~realized ~~markets.~~gains ~~The~~of ~~changes~~$96,000 inand ~~realized~~the ~~gains~~decrease ~~and~~in gross realized losses isof $101,000 are primarily attributable to ~~lower~~improved ~~trading~~performance ~~activity~~in the equity markets for the three months ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. ~~In the first quarter of 2009 trading activity increased as we reduced our position in non-agency CMOs and selected equities which resulted in additional gains and losses.~~

Financial Services Revenues

Financial Services revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Broker/dealer commissions	$	1,804	$	1,669	$	135	8%
Bank debt/Trade claims		172		142		30	21%
Management fees and other		98		16		82	513%
Total financial services revenues	$	2,074	$	1,827	$	247	14%

Our Financial Services revenue increased $247,000 (14%) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. APS Financial, our broker-dealer, derives most of its revenue from transactions in the fixed income market, in both investment and non-investment grade securities. As the table above shows, commission revenue at APS Financial was up $135,000 (8%) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 resulting primarily from the hiring of additional experienced brokers. Our bank debt/trade claim revenues increased $30,000 (21%) in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This revenue stream is often irregular and generally is characterized by longer lead times to close a transaction compared to our traditional broker-dealer transactions. The increase in 2010 is due to a combination of an increase in bankruptcy default rates over the last twelve months as well as from a timing issue of closing these lengthy transactions. The $82,000 (513%) increase in management fees and other revenues is primarily the result of higher investment banking fees in the current period. Though we no longer actively seek investment banking business, we will on occasion participate in private placements if the right opportunity is presented to us, as was the case in the current period.

Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses

Loss and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Losses and loss adjustment expenses:
Current accident year	$	1311,~~309~~312	$	11,~~496~~183	$	~~1,813~~129	161%
Prior accident years		(87,~~435~~084)		(4,~~699~~762)		(32,~~736~~322)	8049%
Calendar year	$	4,~~874~~228	$	6,~~797~~421	$	(12,~~923~~193)	-2834%

36Loss and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by $2,193,000 (34%) to $4,228,000 from $6,421,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease of $2,193,000 is primarily the result of higher favorable development of $2,322,000 (49%) on prior year losses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses totaled $11,312,000, an increase of $129,000 (1%) over the prior current year comparable quarter. We increased the current accident year estimated losses based on 85 new claims reported during the current quarter for the 2010 accident year and the increase in loss exposures associated with the growth in policyholders at September 30, 2010 and our recent entry into new geographic markets with a shift to higher policy limits. Prior year losses developed favorably by $7,084,000 as a result of reductions in our estimates of claims severity, principally the 2002 through 2009 accident years, driven by closure of 97 claims during the period. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses were $11,183,000 based on 100 claims reported and a policyholder head count of 6,401 and there was $4,762,000 of favorable development on prior years’ claims. The favorable development experienced during these periods, is the result of better than expected trends in paid loss severity and a lower number of claims closed with indemnity than anticipated. The positive effects of tort reform in Texas on average claim severity has resulted in continued favorable development of reserves and improved claim development patterns. During the quarter we continued to favorably settle a significant number of post-tort reform claims at below the reserved amounts. The historically low levels of reported claims in recent years would typically be indicative that those claims still being reported are of a more meritorious nature. Accordingly, the actuarial projection of ultimate losses includes an assumption that those claims closed in future periods with damages should be increasing. However, the trend of increasing paid claim frequency has not materialized. As a result, the actuarial projection of ultimate losses pertaining to prior accident years has decreased, resulting in favorable prior year development.

Loss and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $1,923,000 (28%) to $4,874,000 from $6,797,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease of $1,923,000 is primarily the result of higher favorable development of $3,736,000 (80%) on prior year losses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses totaled $13,309,000, an increase of $1,813,000 (16%) over the prior current year comparable quarter. We increased the current accident year estimated losses based on 105 new claims reported during the current quarter for the 2010 accident year and the increase in loss exposures associated with the growth in policyholders at June 30, 2010; higher reinsurance retention levels; and our recent entry into new geographic markets with a shift to higher policy limits. Prior year losses developed favorably by $8,435,000 as a result of reductions in our estimates of claims severity, principally the 2002 and the 2006 through 2009 accident years, driven by closure of 108 claims during the period. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses were $11,496,000 based on 100 claims reported and a policyholder head count of 6,268 and there was $4,699,000 of favorable development on prior years’ claims. The favorable development experienced during these periods, is the result of better than expected trends in paid loss severity and a lower number of claims closed with indemnity than anticipated. The positive effects of tort reform in Texas on average claim severity has resulted in continued favorable development of reserves and improved claim development patterns. During the quarter we continued to favorably settle a significant number of post-tort reform claims at below the reserved amounts. The historically low levels of reported claims in recent years would typically be indicative that those claims still being reported are of a more meritorious nature. Accordingly, the actuarial projection of ultimate losses includes an assumption that those claims closed in future periods with damages should be increasing. However, the trend of increasing paid claim frequency has not materialized. As a result, the actuarial projection of ultimate losses pertaining to prior accident years has decreased, resulting in favorable prior year development. 35

Other Underwriting Expenses and Net Change in Deferred Acquisition Costs

Other underwriting expenses and net change in deferred acquisition costs for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Salaries and related benefits	$	~~871~~729	$	~~926~~577	$	~~(55)~~152	-626%
Commission expense		974		656		318	48%
Incentive compensation		326		(95)		421	443%
Premium taxes		255		256		(1)	0%
Commission expense		858		1,394		(536)	-38%
Professional fees		82		84		(2)	-2%
Premium taxes		198		366		(168)	-46%
Other expenses		347		588		(241)	-41%
Professional fees		35		143		(108)	-76%
Total other underwriting expenses		2,529		2,510		19	1%
Other expenses		658		694		(36)	-5%
Change in deferred acquisition costs		61		264		(203)	-77%
Total other underwriting expenses		2,804		3,079		(275)	-9%
Total	$	2,590	$	2,774	$	(184)	-7%
Change in deferred acquisition costs		(57)		(331)		274	-83%
Total	$	2,747	$	2,748	$	(1)	0%

Other underwriting expenses ~~increased~~decreased by $19275,000 (19%) to $2,~~529~~804,000 from $23,~~510~~079,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Other underwriting expenses consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, commissions to agents, premium taxes and other general underwriting expenses related to managing our Insurance Services segment. Salaries ~~decreased~~and related benefits increased $55152,000 primarily due to the ~~departure~~addition of annew ~~officer~~managerial personnel and annual merit pay increases. The increase in incentive compensation of ~~our~~$421,000 ~~Insurance~~is ~~Services~~due ~~division~~to additional accrued incentive compensation for 2010, and in ~~July~~the prior quarter for 2009., ~~Those~~approximately ~~responsibilities~~$342,000 ~~were~~was ~~assumed~~reclassified byfrom ~~other~~underwriting ~~employees~~expenses ofto ~~the~~general ~~segment~~and administrative expenses. ~~Commissions~~Commission expense to agents ~~increased~~decreased $~~318~~536,000 ~~even~~due ~~though~~to lower written ~~premiums~~premium ~~decreased~~of $3,664,000 and also due to certain policyholders paying the agents on a direct basis as opposed to API paying the agents. ~~during~~Premium taxes decreased $168,000 due to lower written premium and a refund received from the ~~2009~~Texas ~~quarter~~Department of Insurance for unused guaranty funds. Professional fees ~~were~~which ~~incurred~~consists primarily ~~for~~of actuarial and accounting services decreased $108,000. The prior year actuarial fees included rate studies which were not incurred during the current year quarter. The net change in deferred acquisition costs, which is comprised of the change in deferred and amortized commissions paid to agents on new and renewal business and deferred and amortized premium taxes, ~~decreased~~increased for three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 by $~~203~~274,000 to $61(57,000) from $~~264~~(331,000) for the comparable period in 2009 due to ~~new costs capitalized exceeding~~ the amortization of prior deferred expenses exceeding new costs capitalized.

Financial Services Expenses

Financial Services expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Broker Commissions	$	1,200	$	992	$	208	21%
Payroll and Benefits		360		442		(82)	-19%
Information Services		140		115		25	22%
Legal and Professional Fees		442		53		389	734%
Other		221		145		76	52%
Total Financial Services Expenses	$	2,363	$	1,747	$	616	35%

Our Financial Services expenses increased $616,000 (35%) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This increase is primarily due to a $389,000 (734%) increase in legal and professional fees which is primarily the result of fees related to ongoing legal disputes and regulatory enforcement activities. See Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein for more information. In addition, broker commissions were $208,000 (21%) higher in the current period as a result of higher commission revenues mentioned above. Information services increased $25,000 (22%) in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 as a result of an increase in the number of brokers. Partially offsetting these expense increases was an $82,000 (19%) decrease in payroll and benefits in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. These cuts were a continuation of the cost reductions begun in 2008.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Payroll and Benefits	$	~~408~~534	$	~~397~~405	$	11129	332%
Incentive Compensation		~~463~~777		~~300~~600		~~163~~177	5430%
Board Compensation and Fees		~~128~~320		~~108~~64		20256	19400%
Options and Other Compensation		2025		1819		26	1132%
Legal and Professional Fees		~~333~~702		~~152~~76		~~181~~626	~~119~~824%
Interest and Dividends		73463		8087		~~(7)~~376	-9432%
Other		~~113~~43		~~109~~107		4(64)	4-60%
Total General & Administrative Expenses	$	1,538	$	1,164	$	375	32%
Total General and Administrative Expenses	$	2,864	$	1,358	$	1,507	111%

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 increased $~~375~~1,507,000 (32111%) compared to the same period in 2009. ~~Legal~~Payroll and ~~professional~~benefits ~~fees~~ increased $~~181~~129,000 (~~119~~32%) in the current period due primarily to ~~fees~~non-recurring ~~associated~~healthcare ~~with~~benefit ~~one-time~~reimbursements ~~projects~~for an officer of the Company. Incentive compensation expenses and board compensation expenses increased $~~163~~177,000 (5430%) and $256,000 (400%), respectively, for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 due to ~~accruals for~~ cash incentive compensation in lieu of deferred stock awards for 2010. ~~Payroll~~Legal and ~~benefits~~professional fees increased $11626,000 (3824%) indue ~~the~~primarily ~~current~~to ~~period~~fees ~~due~~associated towith ~~normal~~the ~~annual~~pending ~~merit~~merger ~~raises~~with ProAssurance. ~~In addition~~Finally, ~~board~~interest ~~compensation~~and ~~costs~~dividends increased ~~$20~~376,000 (19432%) in the ~~current~~ three ~~month~~months ~~period~~ended ~~due~~September in30, ~~part~~2010 compared to ~~annual committee chair stipends as well as an increase in~~ the ~~number~~same ~~of board-related meetings in the current~~ period. ~~Partially offsetting these expense increases was a $7,000 (9%) decrease~~ in ~~interest~~2009 ~~and dividends in the current quarter~~ as a result of ~~lower~~the ~~interest~~redemption ~~expense~~of ~~on a lower balance for~~ our ~~mandatorily~~ redeemable preferred stock.

3836

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

Condensed income statement data for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

(in thousands except per share data and percentages)	~~Six~~Nine Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Revenues	$	4055,~~756~~385	$	3955,~~352~~810	$	~~1,404~~(425)	4-1%
Income from Operations		16,228		14,857		1,371	9%
Net income from continuing operations		15,997		15,795		202	1%
Net Income		10,728		9,651		1,077	11%
Net income (loss)from discontinued operations		(367)		298		(665)	-223%
Diluted Net Income Per Share	$	1.54	$	1.36	$	0.18	13%
Net income		15,630		16,093		(463)	-3%
Diluted net Income Per Share	$	2.25	$	2.28	$	(0.03)	-1%

Further explanation for the ~~six~~nine months over ~~six~~nine months variances are described below.

Premium related income statement data for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	~~Six~~Nine Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Gross premiums written	$	3350,~~080~~862	$	3253,~~222~~668	$	~~858~~(2,806)	3-5%
Premium ceded:
Current year		(1,~~030~~563)		(1,~~017~~538)		(1325)	12%
Prior year		~~777~~1,067		12,~~680~~877		(~~903~~1,810)	-5463%
Net premiums ceded		(~~253~~496)		~~663~~1,339		(~~916~~1,835)	-~~138~~137%
Net premiums earned	$	3248,~~180~~322	$	3350,~~282~~877	$	(12,~~102~~555)	-35%

Gross Premiums Written

Gross premiums ~~and maintenance fees~~ written ~~increased~~decreased $~~858~~2,806,000 (35%) to $3350,~~080~~862,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $3253,~~222~~668,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. ~~primarily~~The ~~due~~primary tocauses ~~the~~for ~~increase~~this ofdecrease ~~policyholders.~~were ~~API~~due ~~increased its number of policyholders~~ to ~~6,783~~continued atrate ~~June~~decreases ~~30,~~on ~~2010~~renewal ~~from~~business 6which,~~268~~ aton ~~June~~average ~~30,~~decreased ~~2009.~~3% ~~Included~~for in the ~~6,783~~current ~~policyholder~~nine ~~headcount~~month ~~were~~period as a ~~number~~result of ~~physician~~competitive ~~groups~~pricing ~~written~~pressures, ~~which~~lower ~~also~~new ~~included~~written ~~coverage~~business ~~for~~of ~~other~~$4,505,000 ~~healthcare~~for ~~providers~~the ~~including~~current ~~physician~~nine ~~extenders~~month ~~and~~period ~~other~~as ~~clinical~~compared ~~support staff. Due~~ to a$6,233,000 ~~much~~of ~~lower~~new ~~risk~~business ~~profile,~~for the ~~premiums~~prior ~~for~~year ~~these~~nine ~~additional~~month ~~clinical~~period ~~support~~and ~~personnel~~policyholder ~~are~~retention ~~substantially~~of ~~lower~~approximately ~~than~~86% for the ~~premiums~~nine ~~charged~~months toended ~~physicians.~~September ~~New~~30, ~~written~~2010 ~~business~~as ~~was~~compared ~~approximately~~to ~~$3,564,000~~91% for the ~~current~~prior year ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month asperiod. ~~compared~~While API increased its number of policyholders to $46,~~823,000~~619 ofat ~~new~~September ~~business~~30, ~~for~~2010 ~~the~~from ~~prior~~6,401 ~~year~~at ~~six~~September ~~months.~~30, ~~Partially~~2009, ~~offsetting~~included ~~premium~~in ~~increases~~the ~~were~~6,619 ~~continuing~~policyholder ~~rate~~headcount ~~decreases~~were ~~which~~a ~~averaged~~number 3%of ~~for~~physician ~~the~~groups ~~current~~written ~~six~~which ~~months~~also asincluded ~~compared~~coverage tofor ~~average~~other ~~rate~~healthcare ~~decreases~~providers ofincluding 6%physician ~~for~~extenders ~~the~~and ~~first~~other ~~six~~clinical ~~months~~support ofstaff. ~~2009~~Due asto a ~~result~~much oflower ~~competitive~~risk ~~pricing~~profile, ~~pressures.~~the ~~Policyholder~~premiums ~~retention~~for ~~continued~~these toadditional beclinical ~~strong~~support atpersonnel ~~approximately~~are ~~91%~~substantially ~~for~~lower than the ~~six~~premiums ~~months~~charged ~~ended~~to ~~June 30, 2010~~physicians.

Premiums Ceded

Premiums ceded expenses increased $~~916~~1,835,000 from $~~663~~1,339,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 to $(~~253~~496,000) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily the result of lower prior year development under the 2002 through 2008 reinsurance treaties. The reinsurance contracts we utilized from 2002 through 2008 are variable premium treaties that have various minimum and maximum rates. The actual premium rate is dependent upon the ultimate losses ceded to the reinsurer under the related treaty. We recognized $~~777~~1,067,000 in favorable prior year development for the current ~~six~~nine month period as compared to recognizing $12,~~680~~877,000 in favorable development in the 2009 ~~six~~nine month period under these treaties driven by better than expected trends in claims severity coupled with relatively stable payment patterns in the reinsurance layer. Current year reinsurance premiums increased $1325,000 (12%) to $1,~~030~~563,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to $1,~~017~~538,000 for the comparable period in 2009. Effective January 1, 2009, we changed our reinsurance treaty such that we retained the first $1,000,000 of any loss occurrence. The 2010 reinsurance agreement provides for us to retain the first $750,000 of any loss occurrence. The 2009 and 2010 treaties are fixed-rate as opposed to the reinsurance contracts we utilized from 2002 through 2008 which were variable premium treaties. While we anticipate that the 2009 and 2010 treaties will reduce our ceded premiums as a percentage of direct premiums ~~written~~earned, thus resulting in a relative increase in net premiums written and earned, the overall impact on earnings is uncertain as the frequency and severity of losses in future periods is not yet known.

Net Premiums Earned

Net premiums ~~and maintenance fees~~ earned decreased by $12,~~102~~555,000 (35%) to $3248,~~180~~322,000 from $3350,~~282~~877,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The decrease in net earned premiums ~~and maintenance fees~~ was primarily due to lower favorable development recognized on the 2002 through 2008 variable premium reinsurance treaties during the ~~six~~nine month period as compared to the prior year comparable period. We recognized $~~777~~1,067,000 and $12,~~680~~877,000 in favorable reinsurance development for the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ~~The increase in gross written premiums will be recognized in future periods as they earn out over the term of the policies.~~

Investment Income

Investment income ~~statement~~ data for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Investment income:
Fixed Maturities	$	46,~~663~~922	$	47,~~930~~230	$	(~~267~~308)	-54%
Equity Securities		~~195~~296		~~179~~297		16(1)	90%
Short-term investments and other		89102		~~151~~194		(6292)	-4147%
Finance charges on premiums receivable		5781		6199		(418)	-718%
Structured annuity		3757		3655		12	34%
Total investment income	$	57,~~041~~458	$	57,~~357~~875	$	(~~316~~417)	-65%
Investment expense		87469		~~140~~517		(5348)	-389%
Net investment income	$	46,~~954~~989	$	57,~~217~~358	$	(~~263~~369)	-5%

40Investment income, net of investment expenses, decreased by $369,000 (5%) to $6,989,000 from $7,358,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period for 2009. The proceeds from the sale of approximately $17,288,000 of non-agency CMOs in 2009 and additional cash generated from operations have been reinvested generally in high quality investment grade fixed income securities with short maturity dates and lower yields. We shortened maturities to continue to focus on preservation of principal over yield during the current economic crisis. In addition, interest rates on money market funds continue to remain at historically low levels. This rebalancing of our fixed income investment portfolio resulted in a corresponding decrease in investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 even though our investment portfolio continues to grow.

Investment income, net of investment expenses, decreased by $263,000 (5%) to $4,954,000 from $5,217,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period for 2009. The proceeds from the sale of approximately $17,288,000 of non-agency CMOs in 2009 and additional cash generated from operations have been reinvested generally in high quality investment grade fixed income securities with short maturity dates and lower yields. We shortened maturities to continue to focus on preservation of principal over yield during the current economic crisis. In addition, interest rates on money market funds continue to remain at historically low levels. This rebalancing of our fixed income investment portfolio resulted in a corresponding decrease in investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 even though our investment portfolio continues to grow.

Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses) and Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

Realized capital gains and losses ~~income statement~~ data for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	~~Six~~Nine Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Gross realized gains	$	~~335~~729	$	~~366~~664	$	~~(31)~~65	-810%
Gross realized (losses)		(~~199~~203)		(~~883~~1,016)		~~684~~813	7780%
Other -than-temporary impairment (losses)		(~~100~~557)		(2,~~007~~245)		1,~~907~~688	9575%
Net realized gains (losses) and OTTI	$	36(31)	$	(2,~~524~~597)	$	2,~~560~~566	~~101~~99%

Net realized capital ~~gains~~losses were $3631,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to net capital losses of $2,~~524~~597,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Net realized losses decreased primarily as a result of lower OTTI losses incurred in our investments in non-agency CMOs of $452,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to $1,892,000 for the same period in 2009. ~~The~~Gross realized losses decreased by $~~100~~813,000 ofmainly ~~OTTI~~due ~~for~~to ~~the~~our ~~six~~decision ~~months~~to ~~ended~~lower ~~June~~our ~~30,~~portfolio ~~2010~~risk isin ~~related~~non-agency toCMOs ~~the~~through ~~write-down~~sales ~~based~~of onapproximately ~~our~~$16.6 ~~intent~~million toof ~~sell~~these ~~our~~securities ~~entire~~during ~~non-agency~~the ~~CMO~~prior ~~portfolio. Provided~~nine wemonths ~~can~~ending ~~obtain~~September an30, ~~appropriate~~2009 ~~price~~incurring onrealized ~~these~~losses ~~securities~~of $437,000 wewith ~~will~~no ~~further~~comparable ~~reduce~~losses ~~our~~during ~~exposure~~the tonine ~~continued~~months ~~deterioration~~ended ofSeptember ~~the~~30, ~~housing sector~~2010.

~~Financial Services Revenues~~ 38

Financial Services revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Six Months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Broker/dealer commissions	$	3,041	$	3,100	$	(59)	-2%
Bank debt/Trade claims		350		142		208	146%
Management fees and other		123		33		90	273%
Total financial services revenues	$	3,514	$	3,275	$	239	7%

Our Financial Services revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased $239,000 (7%) compared to the same period in 2009. APS Financial, our broker-dealer subsidiary, derives most of its revenue from transactions in the fixed income market, in both investment and non-investment grade securities. As the table above shows, commission revenue at APS Financial was down 59,000 (2%) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily as a result of a lower trading activity in the first quarter of 2010. Our bank debt and trade claim revenues were higher by $208,000 (146%) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. While this line of business is irregular with longer lead times to close a transaction than our traditional broker-dealer transactions, the increase is due to more than just timing differences. An increase in bankruptcies resulting from the economic downturn has resulted in increased product availability and greater opportunity to broker deals. Our management fees and other revenue, which includes investment banking fees, increased $90,000 (273%). Though we no longer actively seek investment banking business, we will on occasion participate in private placements if the right opportunity is presented to us, as was the case in 2010.

Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses

Loss and loss adjustment expenses for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	~~Six~~Nine Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Losses and loss adjustment expenses:
Current accident year	$	2435,~~558~~870	$	2233,~~516~~699	$	2,~~042~~171	96%
Prior accident years		(1219,~~743~~827)		(914,~~598~~360)		(35,~~145~~467)	3338%
Calendar year	$	1116,~~815~~043	$	1219,~~918~~339	$	(13,~~103~~296)	-917%

Loss and loss adjustment expenses for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased by $13,~~103~~296,000 (917%) to $1116,~~815~~043,000 from $1219,~~918~~339,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. We increased the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses by $2,~~042~~171,000 or 96% to $2435,~~558~~870,000 as compared to $2233,~~516~~699,000 for the 2009 period. This increase was based on continued growth in loss exposures of an additional ~~515~~218 policyholders from 6,~~268~~401 at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 to 6,~~783~~619 at ~~June~~September 30, 2010; ~~higher reinsurance retention levels;~~ and our recent entry into new geographic markets with a shift to higher policy limits. In addition, our prior year’s positive claim development increased by $35,~~145~~467,000 from $914,~~598~~360,000 of favorable development for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 to $1219,~~743~~827,000 of favorable development for the current year ~~six~~nine month period. The favorable development experienced during these periods, is the result of better than expected trends in paid loss severity and a lower number of claims closed with indemnity payments than anticipated. ~~We also continue to reserve at the upper end of the reserve range, in all periods including the current accident year.~~

Other Underwriting Expenses and Net Change in Deferred Acquisition Costs

Other underwriting expenses and net change in deferred acquisition costs for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	~~Six~~Nine Months ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		Change		% Change
Salaries and related benefits	$	12,~~811~~232	$	1,~~776~~927	$	35305	216%
Commission expense		2,223		2,015		208	10%
Incentive compensation		634		331		303	92%
Premium taxes		571		540		31	6%
Commission expense		3,081		3,409		(328)	-10%
Professional fees		154		156		(2)	-1%
Premium taxes		769		906		(137)	-15%
Other expenses		929		1,244		(315)	-25%
Professional fees		189		299		(110)	-37%
Total other underwriting expenses		5,688		5,731		(43)	-1%
Other expenses		1,636		1,994		(358)	-18%
Change in deferred acquisition costs		(34)		83		(117)	-141%
Total other underwriting expenses		8,541		8,866		(325)	-4%
Total	$	5,654	$	5,814	$	(160)	-3%
Change in deferred acquisition costs		(91)		(248)		157	-63%
Total	$	8,450	$	8,618	$	(168)	-2%

Other underwriting expenses decreased by $43325,000 (14%) to $58,~~688~~541,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $58,~~731~~866,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Other underwriting expenses consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, commissions to agents, premium taxes and other general underwriting expenses related to managing our Insurance Services segment. Salaries and related benefits increased $35305,000 due to the addition of ~~sales~~managerial personnel and merit pay increases. ~~Commissions~~The increase in incentive compensation of $303,000 is related to ~~agents~~the ~~and~~additional ~~premium~~accrual ~~taxes~~for ~~increased~~2010. Commission expense to agents decreased by $~~208~~328,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the prior year ~~six~~nine month period due to ~~increased~~decreased premiums written. Premium taxes decreased $137,000 due to decreased premiums written and ~~higher~~a ~~commission~~refund ~~rates~~for ~~paid~~unused onguaranty ~~new~~funds ~~business~~previously ~~than~~paid ~~renewal~~to ~~business~~the state of Texas. ~~Premium~~Professional ~~taxes~~fees ~~increased~~decreased $31110,000 due to ~~increased~~less ~~premiums~~work ~~written~~performed for rate studies in 2010 as compared to 2009. Other expenses decreased based on reductions in various expense categories such as lower travel and entertainment, printing, office supplies and recruiting expenses. The net change in deferred acquisition costs, which is comprised of the change in deferred and amortized commissions paid to agents on new and renewal business and deferred and amortized premium taxes, ~~decreased~~increased for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 by $~~117~~157,000 to $(3491,000) from $83(248,000) for the comparable period in 2009 due to ~~new costs capitalized exceeding~~ the amortization of prior deferred expenses exceeding new costs capitalized.

~~Financial Services Expenses~~39

Financial Services expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	Six Months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Broker Commissions	$	1,997	$	1,765	$	232	13%
Payroll and Benefits		738		951		(213)	-22%
Information Services		273		224		49	22%
Legal and Professional Fees		629		128		501	391%
Other		418		307		111	36%
Total Financial Services Expenses	$	4,055	$	3,375	$	680	20%

Our Financial Services expenses increased $680,000 (20%) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The primary reason for this current year increase is a $501,000 (391%) increase in legal and professional fees. This increase is due to fees associated to ongoing legal and regulatory disputes. See Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein for more information. Broker commission expenses increased $232,000 (13%) in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 as a result of the increase in commission revenues associated with our bank debt/trade claims division mentioned above. In addition, brokers were hired during the past several months with higher percentage commission structures. Higher commission rates can be paid to contract brokers since the overhead associated with their employment is considerably lower than those costs required for employee brokers. Partially offsetting these expense increases is a $213,000 (22%) decrease in payroll and benefits. This decrease in the result of ongoing cost cutting measures implemented beginning in 2008.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 are included in the following table:

($ in thousands)	~~Six~~Nine Months ~~Ended~~ended ~~June~~September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Payroll and Benefits	$	~~841~~1,402	$	~~830~~1,265	$	11137	111%
Incentive Compensation		~~974~~1,751		~~524~~1,124		~~450~~627	8656%
Board Compensation and Fees		~~250~~570		~~316~~380		~~(66)~~190	~~-21~~50%
Options and Other Compensation		4166		4462		~~(3)~~4	-76%
Legal and Professional Fees		~~484~~1,186		~~255~~331		~~229~~855	90258%
Interest and Dividends		~~157~~620		~~178~~265		~~(21)~~355	~~-12~~134%
Other		~~257~~319		~~241~~361		16(42)	7-12%
Total General & Administrative Expenses	$	35,~~004~~914	$	23,~~388~~788	$	~~617~~2,127	2656%

General and administrative expenses increased $~~617~~2,127,000 (2656%) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Payroll and Benefits increased $137,000 (11%) due primarily to non-recurring healthcare benefit reimbursements for an officer of the Company. Incentive compensation expenses increased $~~450~~627,000 (8656%) and board compensation and fees increased $190,000 (50%), respectively, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 due to accruals for cash incentive compensation ~~to be paid~~ in lieu of deferred stock for 2010. Legal and professional fees increased $~~229~~855,000 (90258%) due to fees associated with ~~one-time~~the ~~projects.~~proposed ~~Partially~~merger ~~offsetting these increases was a $66,000 (21%) decrease in board compensation costs due primarily to lower stock options expense associated~~ with ~~members of the board of directors as the larger stock grants resulting from the acquisition of our insurance subsidiary became fully vested and thus fully expensed in 2009~~ProAssurance. ~~Also,~~ ~~interest~~Interest and dividends ~~were~~increased $21355,000 (12134%) ~~lower~~due into the ~~current~~redemption ~~period as a result~~ of ~~lower~~our ~~interest expense on a lower balance for mandatorily~~ redeemable preferred stock.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The primary sources of our liquidity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 were funds provided by insurance premiums collected, net investment income, recoveries from reinsurers and proceeds from the maturity and sale of invested assets. The primary uses of cash are losses from insurance claims, loss adjustment expenses, operating expenses, the acquisition of invested and fixed assets, reinsurance premiums, stock repurchases and dividends to shareholders.

44Cash Flows. Our total cash and cash equivalents balance at September 30, 2010 was $15,330,000, a decrease of $2,947,000 (16%) in the current nine month period as net cash provided by operating activities was primarily utilized to increase our investment portfolio. Our cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $16,627,000 at September 30, 2010 on the strength of $15,630,000 in net income. Our Insurance Services segment generated the bulk of the cash received from operating activities, the result of increased premium receipts and decreased claims payouts. Our cash flows used in investing activities totaled $8,714,000 in the current nine month period primarily as a result of purchases of available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities in excess of proceeds from the sale of these securities. Cash used in financing activities totaled $10,860,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily as a result of a cash dividend to shareholders, the redemption of all issued and outstanding shares of our redeemable preferred stock and repurchases of our common stock under our share repurchase program. For details of the amounts described above, refer to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of this Form 10-Q.

~~Cash~~Historically, ~~Flows.~~we ~~Our~~have ~~total~~maintained ~~cash~~a ~~and~~strong ~~cash~~liquidity ~~equivalents~~position ~~balance at June 30~~and, ~~2010~~as ~~was~~a ~~$15~~result,~~781,000,~~ awe ~~decrease~~have ofbeen ~~$2,496,000~~able ~~(14%)~~to insatisfy ~~the~~our ~~current~~operational ~~six~~and ~~month~~capital ~~period~~expenditure asrequirements ~~net~~with cash ~~provided~~generated byfrom our operating ~~activities~~and ~~was~~investing ~~primarily utilized to increase our investment portfolio~~activities. ~~Our~~These ~~cash~~same ~~flows~~sources ~~provided~~of byfunds ~~operating~~have ~~activities~~also ~~totaled~~allowed ~~$10,862,000~~us atto ~~June~~pursue ~~30,~~investment ~~2010~~and onexpansion ~~the~~opportunities ~~strength~~consistent ofwith ~~$10,728,000~~our ingrowth ~~net income~~plans. ~~Our~~Although ~~Insurance~~there ~~Services~~can ~~segment~~be ~~generated~~no ~~the~~assurance ~~bulk~~our ~~of the cash received from~~ operating activities, ~~the~~will ~~result~~provide ofpositive ~~increased premium receipts and decreased claims payouts. Our~~ cash ~~flows~~flow ~~used~~ in ~~investing~~the ~~activities totaled $8~~future,~~252,000~~ inwe ~~the~~are ~~current~~optimistic ~~six~~that ~~month~~our ~~period~~working ~~primarily~~capital asrequirements awill ~~result~~be ofmet ~~purchases~~for ofthe ~~available-for-sale~~foreseeable ~~fixed~~future ~~maturity~~because ~~and~~our ~~equity~~current ~~securities~~cash inposition ~~excess~~is ofvery ~~proceeds~~strong, ~~from~~with ~~the~~a ~~sale~~balance of ~~these~~approximately ~~securities. Cash used in financing activities totaled~~ $515,~~106~~330,000 ~~for the six months ended June 30~~, ~~2010~~and ~~primarily as~~ a ~~result~~large ofportion ~~a cash dividend to shareholders, preferred share redemptions and repurchases~~ of our ~~common~~approximate ~~stock~~$253,537,000 ~~under~~investment ~~our~~portfolio ~~share~~is ~~repurchase~~in ~~program. For details of the amounts described above~~short-term, ~~refer~~highly toliquid ~~the~~bonds ~~Consolidated~~and ~~Statements~~other offixed ~~Cash~~income ~~Flows of this Form 10-Q~~securities.

~~Historically,~~Capital weExpenditures. ~~have~~In ~~maintained~~April a2007 ~~strong~~we ~~liquidity~~entered ~~position~~into ~~and, as~~ a ~~result,~~contract wewith ~~have~~a ~~been~~vendor ~~able~~ to ~~satisfy~~provide ~~our~~us ~~operational~~with and ~~capital~~implement ~~expenditure~~an ~~requirements~~integrated ~~with~~policy ~~cash generated from our operating~~ and ~~investing~~claims ~~activities~~administration system. ~~These~~The ~~same~~total ~~sources~~capitalized ofexpenditures ~~funds~~for ~~have~~the ~~also~~project ~~allowed~~are usanticipated to ~~pursue~~be ~~investment~~approximately ~~and~~$2,500,000. ~~expansion~~Our ~~opportunities~~capital ~~consistent~~expenditures ~~with~~for ~~our~~the ~~growth~~nine ~~plans.~~months ~~Although~~ended ~~there~~September ~~can~~30, be2010 nowere ~~assurance~~$177,000 ~~our~~of ~~operating~~which ~~activities~~$120,000 ~~will~~were ~~provide~~related ~~positive~~to ~~cash~~this ~~flow~~software ininstallation. ~~the~~We ~~future,~~have wecapitalized ~~are~~a ~~optimistic~~total ~~that~~of ~~our~~$1,893,000 ~~working~~since ~~capital~~the ~~requirements~~inception ~~will~~of bethis ~~met~~project ~~for~~through ~~the~~September ~~foreseeable~~30, ~~future~~2010. ~~because~~We ~~our~~expect ~~current~~to ~~cash~~incur ~~position~~additional iscapitalized ~~very~~expenditures ~~strong, with a balance~~ of approximately $15498,~~781,~~000, ~~and~~for athe ~~large~~remainder ~~portion~~ of this ~~our~~project, ~~approximate~~which ~~$248,038,000~~are ~~investment~~expected ~~portfolio~~to isbe infunded ~~short-term,~~from ~~highly~~cash ~~liquid~~on ~~bonds~~hand ~~and~~over ~~other~~the ~~fixed~~remainder ~~income~~of ~~securities~~2010.

Capital Expenditures. In April 2007 we entered into a contract with a vendor to provide us with and implement an integrated policy and claims administration system. The total capitalized expenditures for the project are anticipated to be approximately $2,400,000. Our capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $133,000 of which $76,000 were related to this software installation. We have capitalized a total of $1,953,000 since the inception of this project through June 30, 2010. We expect to incur additional capitalized expenditures of approximately $447,000 for the remainder of this project, which are expected to be funded from cash on hand over the remainder of 2010.40

Restrictions on Dividends by API. In addition to restrictions on dividends and distributions applicable to all Texas stock insurance companies, for so long as any ~~Series A~~ redeemable preferred stock is outstanding, the Texas Department of Insurance prohibits API from paying dividends to us in any calendar year unless and until we have complied with our redemption and dividend payment obligations to the holders of our ~~Series A~~ redeemable preferred stock for that year. Our agreement with the Texas Department of Insurance also provides that, until all of the ~~Series A~~ redeemable preferred stock has been fully redeemed and all dividends have paid, API will not make aggregate annual dividends to us with respect to API’s capital stock in excess of the lesser of 10% of API’s prior year-end policyholder statutory surplus or API’s prior year statutory net income, and in no event may such distributions exceed API’s statutory earned surplus. Accordingly our subsidiaries may not be able to pay funds to us and, even if paid such funds may not be sufficient to enable us to meet our obligations. The dividend restriction for 2008 and 2009, based on 10% of API’s prior year ended statutory surplus, was $7,717,000 and $8,804,000, respectively, and for those respective years dividends paid to us were $7,377,000 and $8,804,000. On September 24, 2010, we redeemed all issued and outstanding shares of our redeemable preferred stock and as such we have requested that the TDI remove these restrictions and believe TDI will grant the request. For 2010, the anticipated annual dividend restriction is $10,324,000, based on 10% of 2009 year-end statutory surplus, and, through ~~June~~the ~~30,~~date ~~2010~~of the redemption, $69,~~175~~324,000 of dividends ~~have~~were ~~been~~ paid to us.

Other Significant Balance Sheet Items

We maintain a portion of our investment portfolio in short-term securities and cash to meet short-term operating liquidity requirements, including the payment of losses and loss expenses. We also invest a substantial part of our cash flow from operations principally in bonds/fixed maturities securities. We plan to continue our emphasis on fixed maturities investments.

45Cash and cash equivalents and invested assets totaled $268,867,000 and $259,338,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents and invested assets represent 87% and 86% of our total assets for the same respective periods. We believe that a majority of our short-term and fixed maturity securities are readily marketable, and that our invested assets have scheduled maturities in line with our projected cash needs.

~~Cash~~Reinsurance ~~and~~recoverables ~~cash~~decreased ~~equivalents~~by ~~and invested assets totaled~~ $~~263~~2,~~819~~481,000 ~~and~~(28%) to $~~259~~6,~~338~~416,000 at ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 ~~and~~from ~~December 31~~$8, ~~2009~~897,000 ~~respectively.~~primarily ~~Cash~~as ~~and~~a ~~cash~~result ~~equivalents and invested assets represent 86% and 87%~~ of ~~our~~increased ~~total~~retention ~~assets~~levels ~~for~~in ~~the same respective periods. We believe that a majority of~~ our ~~short-term~~2009 and ~~fixed~~2010 ~~maturity~~reinsurance ~~securities~~contracts ~~are~~as ~~readily~~discussed ~~marketable,~~in ~~and~~Note ~~that~~7 ~~our~~to ~~invested~~the ~~assets~~consolidated ~~have~~financial ~~scheduled~~statements ~~maturities~~included ~~in line with our projected cash needs~~herein.

~~Reinsurance~~In ~~recoverables~~addition ~~decreased~~to byan $2adjustment to premiums ceded,~~307,000~~ ~~(26%)~~estimates of ultimate reinsurance ceded premium amounts compared to $6the amounts paid on a provisional basis give rise to a balance sheet asset classified as “Other Amounts Receivable Under Reinsurance Contracts” or a balance sheet liability classified as “Funds Held Under Reinsurance Treaties.” Furthermore,~~590,000~~ ateach ~~June~~retrospective treaty requires a 24 or 36 month holding period before any premium adjustments or cash can be returned or paid. The ultimate settlement amount is not determined until all losses have been settled under the respective treaties. As of September 30, 2010, ~~from~~we have recorded a balance sheet liability, “Funds Held Under Reinsurance Treaties” of $82,~~897~~410,000, ~~primarily~~which asrepresent athe ~~result~~differences ofbetween ~~increased~~the ~~retention~~estimates ~~levels~~of inultimate ~~our~~reinsurance ~~2009~~premiums ~~and~~ceded ~~2010~~amounts ~~reinsurance~~for ~~contracts~~the as2002 ~~discussed~~through in2008 ~~Note~~treaty 8years as compared to the ~~consolidated~~amounts ~~financial~~paid ~~statements~~on ~~included~~a ~~herein.~~provisional basis.

InFederal ~~addition~~income totax anreceivable ~~adjustment~~increased ~~to premiums ceded~~$3,555,000 ~~estimates of ultimate reinsurance ceded premium amounts compared~~ to ~~the~~$4,178,000 ~~amounts~~at ~~paid~~September on30, a2010 ~~provisional~~from ~~basis~~$623,000 ~~give~~at ~~rise~~December ~~to a balance sheet asset classified as “Other Amounts Receivable Under Reinsurance Contracts” or a balance sheet liability classified as “Funds Held Under Reinsurance Treaties.” Furthermore~~31, ~~each retrospective treaty requires a 24 or 36 month holding period before any premium adjustments or cash can be returned or paid~~2009. The ~~ultimate~~increase ~~settlement~~reflects ~~amount~~payments isfor ~~not~~2010 ~~determined~~taxes ~~until~~in ~~all~~excess ~~losses have been settled under the respective treaties. As~~ of ~~June~~our ~~30,~~current ~~2010,~~accrued wetax ~~have recorded a balance sheet~~ liability, ~~“Funds~~and ~~Held Under Reinsurance Treaties” of $2,700,000, which represent the differences between the estimates of ultimate reinsurance premiums ceded~~ amounts receivable for ~~the~~a ~~2002~~bad ~~through~~debt ~~2008~~deduction ~~treaty~~related ~~years as compared~~ to ~~the~~credit ~~amounts~~impairments ~~paid~~ on acertain ~~provisional~~non-agency ~~basis~~CMOs.

~~Federal~~Deferred ~~income~~ tax ~~receivable~~assets ~~increased~~decreased $12,~~861~~898,000 (48%) to $23,~~484~~117,000 at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $~~623~~6,015,000 at December 31, 2009. ~~The~~primarily ~~increase~~due ~~reflects~~to ~~payments~~an ~~for~~increase ~~2010~~in ~~taxes~~the intax ~~excess~~effect of ~~our~~net ~~current~~unrealized ~~accrued~~gains ~~tax~~in ~~liability,~~our ~~and~~investment ~~amounts~~portfolio. ~~due~~The ~~for~~change ain ~~bad~~unrealized ~~debt~~gains, ~~deduction~~net ~~related~~of tolosses ~~credit~~was ~~impairments~~primarily ondue ~~certain~~to ~~non-agency~~improvements ~~CMOs~~in market conditions.

~~Deferred~~Trade ~~tax~~payables ~~assets~~increased ~~decreased~~ $~~527~~2,022,000 (92,151%) to $52,~~488~~116,000 at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $694,~~015,~~000 at December 31, 2009 primarily due to ~~an increase in~~ the ~~tax~~purchase ~~effect~~ of ~~net~~available-for-sale ~~unrealized~~securities ~~gains~~at inthe ~~our~~end ~~investment portfolio. The change in unrealized gains, net~~ of ~~losses~~August ~~was~~but ~~primarily~~which ~~due~~did tonot ~~improvements~~settle inuntil ~~market~~early ~~conditions~~October 2010.

~~Other~~Accrued ~~assets~~expenses ~~increased~~and other liabilities decreased $21,~~805~~116,000 (~~195~~18%) to $45,~~237~~255,000 at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 from $16,~~432~~371,000 at December 31, 2009., ~~The~~as ~~increase~~a isresult ~~primarily~~of ~~due~~a todecrease in the ~~sale~~amount of ~~$2,900,000~~advance ofpremiums ~~securities~~received atduring the ~~end~~September ofquarter ~~June~~as ~~but~~compared ~~which~~to ~~did~~the ~~not~~December ~~settle until July 2010~~quarter. ~~Until~~January ~~cash~~ is ~~received,~~normally ~~these~~a ~~transactions~~much ~~are~~larger ~~treated~~month for renewals as ~~securities~~compared ~~receivable~~to ~~and~~October, ~~included~~therefore resulting in ~~other~~a ~~assets~~lower ~~for~~amount ~~presentation~~of ~~purposes.~~advance premium receipts in September.

Trade payables increased $1,828,000 (1,945%) to $1,922,000 at June 30, 2010 from $94,000 at December 31, 2009 due to the purchase of available-for-sale securities at the end of June but which did not settle until early July 2010.

Accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased $647,000 (10%) to $5,724,000 at June 30, 2010 from $6,371,000 at December 31, 2009, primarily as a result of payment of accrued 2009 incentive compensation in March 2010 in excess of additional accruals for 2010 incentive compensation.

Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The effects of new accounting pronouncements are described in Note 32 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are principally exposed to three types of market risk related to our investment operations, including credit risk, interest rate risk, and equity price risk. The term market risk refers to the risk of a loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices such as interest rates, credit risk, equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates.

We invest our assets primarily in fixed maturity securities, which as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 comprised approximately 8990% and 87%, respectively, of total investments, including unrestricted cash balances, at market value. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of investments in fixed maturity securities was $~~235~~241,~~401~~112,000 and $226,583,000, respectively. The increase in fixed income maturities is primarily the result of the purchase of additional fixed maturity securities through cash received from operations. Our intent is to continue to focus on preservation of principal over yield during the current economic crisis.

The fixed income maturities consist predominately of investment grade U.S. government agency and non-agency CMOs and U.S. government agency mortgage-backed bonds for the purpose of generating ample cash flow to meet claim funding requirements while maintaining a reasonable investment yield.

We have exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of fixed income securities. We control this exposure by emphasizing investment grade quality in the fixed income securities we purchase. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, substantially all of our fixed income portfolio consisted of investment grade securities. We believe that this concentration of investment grade securities limits our exposure to credit risk on our fixed income investments. The financial environment globally and in the United States has recently experienced significant volatility. While we experienced recent increases in the fair market value of our investment portfolio, our investment holdings have been affected by these current poor economic conditions and recent changes in the financial and credit markets, and we rely on the investment income produced by our investment portfolio to contribute to our profitability. Future changes in interest rates and credit quality caused by a continued market downturn will likely result in fluctuations in the income derived from, the valuation of, and in the case of declines in credit quality, payment defaults on, our fixed maturities securities, which could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

Our investment portfolio is also subject to credit and cash flow risk, including risks associated with our investments in mortgage-backed securities. Because our investment portfolio is the largest component of our consolidated balance sheet, further deterioration of the economy and the financial and credit markets could result in additional other-than-temporary-impairments (“OTTI”) that could be material to our financial condition and operating results. For examples, such economic changes could arise from overall changes in the financial markets or specific changes to industries, companies or municipalities in which we maintain our investment holdings. Also, in periods of market illiquidity and instability such as the current financial crisis, the fair value of our investments is more difficult to estimate, could result in assessments of fair value greater or less than amounts received in actual transactions and may have unforeseen consequences that we are currently unable to predict. Volatile or illiquid markets increase the likelihood that such assumptions may not behave in historically predictable manners, resulting in fair value estimates that are overstated compared with actual amounts that could be realized upon disposition or maturity of the security. For additional discussion of our fixed maturities securities including our non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) and related OTTI as well as our fair value measurements, see Notes 43 and 65 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein.

The value of the fixed income maturities are also subject to interest rate risk. As market interest rates decrease, the fair value of our fixed maturity portfolio increases with the opposite holding true in rising interest rate environments. All of our fixed maturities securities are designated as available-for-sale and, accordingly, are presented at fair value on our balance sheets. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely affected due to a rise in interest rates, and we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. We believe we are in a position to hold our fixed income investments until maturity if we elect to do so.

47Equity securities comprised approximately 4% and 5% of total investments, including unrestricted cash, at market value as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of investments in equity securities was $10,835,000 and $12,944,000, respectively.

Changes in interest rates as well as continued market instability due to a prolonged economic crisis continue to have an impact in our Financial Services segment. The general level of interest rates may trend higher or lower in 2010 and this move may impact our level of business in different fixed income sectors. Since revenues are primarily recorded as commissions earned on the trading of fixed income securities, a volatile interest rate environment or continued poor economic conditions in 2010 could lead to investor uncertainty and an unwillingness to invest, thus negatively affecting our commission revenues. 42

Equity securities ~~comprised~~are ~~approximately~~subject 4%to ~~and~~equity 5%price ofrisk, ~~total~~which ~~investments,~~is ~~including~~defined ~~unrestricted~~as ~~cash,~~the at potential for loss in market value asdue to a decline in equity prices. The value of ~~June~~common ~~30,~~stock ~~2010~~equity investments is dependent upon the general conditions in the securities markets and ~~December~~the ~~31,~~business ~~2009,~~and ~~respectively~~financial performance of the individual companies in the portfolio. AsValues are typically based on future economic prospects as perceived by investors in the equity markets. We regularly review the carrying value of ~~June~~our ~~30,~~investments ~~2010~~and identify and ~~December~~record ~~31,~~losses ~~2009,~~when events and circumstances indicate that such declines in the fair value of ~~investments~~such inassets ~~equity~~below ~~securities~~our ~~was~~accounting basis are other-than-temporary. We recorded $10105,~~934,~~000 ~~and~~in ~~$12~~write-downs on equity securities for the nine months ended September 30,~~944,000,~~ ~~respectively~~2010 as a result of these equities having OTTI.

Equity securities are subject to equity price risk, which is defined as the potential for loss in market value due to a decline in equity prices. The value of common stock equity investments is dependent upon the general conditions in the securities markets and the business and financial performance of the individual companies in the portfolio. Values are typically based on future economic prospects as perceived by investors in the equity markets. We regularly review the carrying value of our investments and identify and record losses when events and circumstances indicate that such declines in the fair value of such assets below our accounting basis are other-than-temporary. We did not record any write-downs on equity securities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as a result of these equities having OTTI.

The remainder of the investment portfolio consists of cash, money market funds and highly liquid short-term investments.

As mentioned above, our invested assets are subject to interest rate risk and equity price risk. The following table presents the effect as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 on current estimated fair values of the fixed maturity securities available-for-sale and equity securities assuming a 100-basis point (1%) increase in market interest rates and a 10% decline in equity prices.

	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value at Current Market Rates/Prices		Estimated Fair Value at Adjusted Market Rates/Prices (1)
			(in thousands)
Interest rate risk:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale	$	~~235~~241,~~401~~112	$	~~235~~241,~~401~~112	$	~~228~~234,~~873~~602
Equity price risk:
Equity securities	$	10,~~934~~835	$	10,~~934~~835	$	9,~~841~~752
(1) Adjusted rates assume a 1% increase in market rates for fixed rate securities and a 10% decline in equity market values.

(1)

Adjusted rates assume a 1% increase in market rates for fixed rate securities and a 10% decline in equity market values.

For all our financial assets and liabilities, we seek to maintain reasonable average durations, consistent with maximizing income, without sacrificing investment quality and providing for liquidity and diversification.

The estimated fair values at current market rates for financial instruments subject to interest rate risk and equity price risk in the table above are the same as those included elsewhere herein. The estimated fair values are calculated using simulation modeling based on the most likely outcome, assuming a 1% shift in interest rates.

This sensitivity analysis provides only a limited, point-in-time view of the market risk sensitivity of certain of our financial instruments. The actual impact of market interest rate and price changes on the financial instruments may differ significantly from those shown in the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis is further limited, as it does not consider any actions that we could take in response to actual and/or anticipated changes in interest rates and equity prices.

We are also subject to credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. Although our reinsurers are liable to us to the extent we cede risk to them, we are ultimately liable to our policyholders on all risks we have reinsured. As a result, reinsurance agreements do not limit our ultimate obligations to pay claims to policyholders and we may not recover claims made to our reinsurers. The ultimate effects of the recent market volatility, credit crises, and overall economic downturn may have unforeseen consequences on the credit quality, liquidity and financial stability of the reinsurers with which we do business. As recent market experience indicates, such deteriorations in financial condition can occur rapidly, leaving us unable to react to such a scenario in a prudent manner consistent with orderly markets. This in turn could adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. For additional discussion of our reinsurers and related reinsurance recoverable, see Note 87 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure material information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognized that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

4944

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory inquiries that have arisen out of the conduct of our business. See a further discussion of litigation matters in Note 1211 of the Notes to our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

InOn ~~addition~~August 31, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with ProAssurance Corporation (“ProAssurance”) and CA Bridge Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ProAssurance (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”) and the Company will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ProAssurance. As a result of the proposed Merger, there are a number of factors, many beyond our control, which may cause results to differ significantly from our expectations. You should consider carefully these risks together with all of the other information ~~set~~included ~~forth~~ in this report, ~~you~~and ~~should~~the ~~carefully~~documents ~~consider~~that we have incorporated by reference, and the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There may be significant delays in the expected completion of the Merger, or the Merger may not close at all.

The completion of the proposed Merger with ProAssurance is subject to customary conditions, including, without limitation, regulatory and APS shareholder approval of the Merger. Required governmental approvals of the Merger, including approval by the Texas Department of Insurance, may not be obtained, or adverse regulatory conditions may be imposed in connection with governmental approvals of the Merger. Further, our shareholders may fail to approve the Merger. In addition, developments in or the outcome of any legal proceedings instituted against us and others in connection with the proposed Merger could delay the expected completion of the Merger. It is possible that factors outside of our control could require the parties to complete the proposed Merger at a later time or not to complete it at all. There is no assurance that all of the various conditions to closing will be satisfied so that the Merger closes.

There are significant costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the Merger, and failure to complete the Merger could result in the incurrence of additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the proposed Merger is not completed for any reason, we will still be obligated to pay the expenses incurred in connection with the Merger, including the fees and expenses of our legal advisors, financial advisors and proxy solicitor, and printing fees and expenses. Also, if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, we could have to pay an $8,500,000 termination fee to ProAssurance. Further, if the Merger is not completed, the trading price of our common stock may decline, to the extent that the current market prices reflect a market assumption that the Merger will be completed. Also, Company management may be focused on completing the Merger instead of pursuing other opportunities that could have been beneficial to the Company or focusing on the day-to-day management of the Company. Any of these events could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition and could adversely affect the price of its common stock.

Business uncertainty and contractual restrictions that exist during the pendency of the Merger could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The effect of the announcement of the Merger on our customer relationships, operating results and business generally is uncertain. Our businesses and operations may be harmed to the extent that third parties, such as customers, brokers and agents, do not support the Merger, believe that the level of service they expect from us could change as a result of the Merger, are uncertain about the future direction or strategy of the Company or are uncertain about the future of management or employees at the Company with whom they have relationships. Any of these uncertainties could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition and could adversely affect the price of its common stock.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Items 2(a) and (b) are ~~inapplicable~~not applicable.

Period	Total Number of shares Purchased (1)	~~Average Price Paid Per Share~~	Average Price Paid Per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	~~Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (2)~~	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (2)
April 2010	-	$	-	-	$	2,374,000
July 2010	-	$	-	-	$	5,539,000
May 2010	55,578	$	23.44	55,578	$	1,072,000
August 2010	-	$	-	-	$	5,539,000
June 2010	23,122	$	23.04	23,122	$	5,539,000
September 2010	-	$	-	-	$	5,539,000
(1) All of the shares were purchased in open market transactions. (2) Our original $2,000,000 stock repurchase program was announced August 17, 2004 and was increased on seven subsequent occasions, most recently increased by $5,000,000 on June 3, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, we had a maximum dollar value of $5,539,000 remaining for the future purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program.

50(1)

No shares were purchased during the quarter.

(2)

Our original $2,000,000 stock repurchase program was announced August 17, 2004 and was increased on seven subsequent occasions, most recently increased by $5,000,000 on June 3, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, we had a maximum dollar value of $5,539,000 remaining for the future purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program.

Our open market stock repurchases are made in reliance upon Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act safe harbor from certain market manipulation claims for purchases by an issuer of its own common stock. Under this rule, we may not open trading in our shares, may not trade in the last thirty minutes of the trading session, may bid no more than the current bid or last trade, and may purchase no more in a single day than 25% of the average daily trading volume for the last four calendar weeks, unless certain rules for larger block trades are followed. Our stock option plan allows us to accept shares owned by an optionee immediately prior to the exercise of an option in payment for the option exercise. Additionally, we consider unsolicited offers to sell shares back to us and make a decision on purchasing them based on the price and our business needs at the time of the offer. We give priority in our repurchases to shares offered in option exercises, followed by open market purchases and finally unsolicited offers from shareholders. We do not reissue any shares acquired in repurchases, instead canceling them upon acquisition.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not Applicable

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

OnNot July 29, 2010, APS Financial and its parent, APS Investment Services, Inc. (“APS Investment Services”), entered into an agreement with an unaffiliated broker-dealer pursuant to which the unaffiliated broker-dealer agreed to hire most of APS Financial’s employees and assume certain contractual obligations of APS Financial. In return, APS Financial and APS Investment Services will receive certain payments tied to the contractual obligations assumed and the unaffiliated broker-dealer’s future financial performance, and APS Financial plans to cease operations as a broker-dealer. Applicable

The cessation of operations of our Financial Services business is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

102.1*

~~Deferred~~Agreement ~~Compensation~~and ~~Master~~ Plan ~~(as~~of ~~amended~~Merger by and ~~restated)~~among ProAssurance Corporation, CA Bridge Corporation and American Physicians Service Group, Inc., dated August 31, 2010 (1)

10.2*

Form of Indemnification Agreement between American Physicians Service Group, Inc. and each of the following named executive officers and directors of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. (1):

Kenneth S. Shifrin Timothy L. LaFrey Marc J. Zimmermann Norris C. Knight, Jr., M.D. Lew N. Little, Jr. Jackie Majors William J. Peche, M.D. William A. Searles Cheryl Williams

10.3*

Executive Employment Agreement between American Physicians Service Group, Inc. and Kenneth S. Shifrin (1)

10.4*

Executive Employment Agreement between American Physicians Service Group, Inc. and Timothy L. LaFrey (1)

10.5*

Executive Employment Agreement between American Physicians Service Group, Inc. and Marc J. Zimmermann (1)

31.1

Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (12)

31.2

Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (12)

32.1

Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (12)

32.2

Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (12)

99.1

Investment Holdings Listing as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 (12)

____________

(*)

Denotes Executive Compensation plans and arrangements.

(1)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company dated September 1, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)

Filed herewith.

5246

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	American Physicians Service Group, Inc.
Date: August 3, 2010	/s/ Marc J. Zimmermann
Date: November 3, 2010	/s/ Marc J. Zimmermann
	Marc J. Zimmermann, Chief Financial Officer

5347

Filing Compare · AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP INC