Filing Compare · PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG

FORM 6-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 under

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of ~~June~~September 2003

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

Berliner Strasse 43
D-35614 Asslar
Federal Republic of Germany
(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of form 20-F or Form 40-F.


Form 20-F		x		Form 40-F		o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (1):


Yes		o		No		x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (7):


Yes		o		No		x

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Yes		o		No		x

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ___________

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (in thousands, unaudited) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands, unaudited) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SIGNATURES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Basis of Presentation
	Business Overview
	Listing
	New U.S. Legislation
	Controls and Procedures
	Auditors
	Management Board
	Adoption of New Accounting Rules
	Inventories
	Stock-Based Compensation — Convertible Bonds
		Employee Participation Program, Term: 2000 through 2005
		Employee Participation Program, Term: 2002 through 2007
		Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
	Derivatives and Hedging Transactions
	Earnings per Ordinary and Diluted Share and ADR
	Share Ownership
	Employees
	Goodwill
	Segment Information
	Income Tax Expense
	Acquisition
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATION

Table of Contents

			Page
Consolidated Statements of Income for the periods ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002				3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the periods ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002				3
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002				4
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002				4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the periods ended June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002 and 2001				5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the periods ended September 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002 and 2001				5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the periods ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002				6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the periods ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002				6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements				7
	Basis of Presentation			7
	Business Overview			7
	Listing			7
	New. U.S. Legislation			8
	New U.S. Legislation			8
	Controls and Procedures			8
	Auditors			9
	Management Board			9
	Adoption of New Accounting Rules			9
	Inventories			10
	Stock-Based Compensation — Convertible Bonds			10
		Employee Participation-Program, Term: 2000 through 2005		10
		Employee Participation-Program, Term: 2002 through 2007		11
		Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation		12
	Derivative and Hedging Transactions			12
	Earnings per Ordinary and Diluted Share and ADR			13
	Share Ownership			14
	Employees			14
	Goodwill			15
	Segment Information			15
	Income Tax Expense			16
	Acquisition			16
Management’s Discussion and Analyses of Financial Condition and Results of Operations				17
Signatures				24
Certification				25

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(in thousands other than per share amounts)
(unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2003			2002			2003			2002
	€			€			€			€
Net sales		3135,~~499~~639			3637,~~496~~356			66102,~~637~~276			73110,~~497~~853
Cost of sales		(1820,~~454~~140	)		(20,~~144~~483	)		(3858,~~371~~511	)		(4060,~~373~~856	)
Gross profit		1315,~~045~~499			16,~~352~~873			2843,~~266~~765			3349,~~124~~997
Selling and marketing expenses		(54,~~037~~775	)		(5,~~929~~987	)		(1015,~~356~~131	)		(1117,~~349~~336	)
General and administrative expenses		(32,~~165~~739	)		(2,~~545~~949	)		(69,~~267~~006	)		(58,~~682~~631	)
Research and development expenses		(21,~~447~~991	)		(2,~~551~~497	)		(46,~~806~~797	)		(57,~~043~~540	)
Depreciation		(~~1,048~~960	)		(1,~~183~~195	)		(23,~~097~~057	)		(23,~~356~~551	)
Operating profit		15,~~348~~034			4,~~144~~245			49,~~740~~774			812,~~694~~939
Interest expense		(906	)		(~~106~~120	)		(~~200~~206	)		(~~225~~345	)
Interest income		~~433~~336			~~459~~588			~~850~~1,186			~~897~~1,485
Foreign exchange gain (loss)		915			(151	)		1,410			(201	)
Foreign exchange gain		424			380			1,834			179
Income before taxes		25,~~606~~788			45,~~346~~093			612,~~800~~588			914,~~165~~258
Income taxes		(12,~~728~~720	)		(1,~~695~~987	)		(35,~~196~~916	)		(35,~~574~~561	)
Net income		~~878~~3,068			23,~~651~~106			36,~~604~~672			58,~~591~~697
Net income per ordinary share and ADR (in €):
Basic		0.1035			0.3035			0.4176			0.6499
Diluted		0.1035			0.3035			0.4176			0.6499

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2003			2002
	€			€
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		68,~~092~~890			72,264
Trade accounts receivable — net		1820,~~033~~941			21,937
Other accounts receivable		1,~~531~~496			3,164
Inventories — net		22,~~380~~782			22,403
Prepaid expenses		~~484~~537			562
Deferred tax assets — net		~~808~~845			775
Other current assets		~~632~~738			713
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		~~111~~116,~~960~~229			121,818
Property, plant and equipment — net		2625,~~745~~932			28,434
Deferred tax assets — net		2,~~627~~609			2,731
Goodwill		1,037			1,037
Other assets		1,~~602~~488			1,476
TOTAL LONG-TERM ASSETS		3231,~~011~~066			33,678
TOTAL ASSETS		~~143~~147,~~971~~295			155,496
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current portion of long-term debt		—			1,291
Trade accounts payable		78,~~969~~137			5,752
Accrued other liabilities		78,~~903~~074			9,188
Income tax liabilities		2,~~283~~555			2,317
Customer deposits		~~796~~1,295			1,938
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		1820,~~951~~061			20,486
Long-term debt		—			7,746
Convertible bonds		~~947~~845			1,011
Accrued pension		35,~~093~~806			33,615
Minority interests		~~130~~—			130
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES		36,~~170~~651			42,502
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share capital (8,754,974 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and 8,790,600 at December 31, 2002, respectively)		22,504			22,504
Share capital (8,715,464 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2003 and 8,790,600 at December 31, 2002, respectively)		22,504			22,504
Additional paid-in-capital		2,821			2,821
Treasury stock		(~~805~~1,792	)		—
Retained earnings		6467,~~571~~639			65,870
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(~~241~~589	)		1,313
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		8890,~~850~~583			92,508
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		~~143~~147,~~971~~295			155,496

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, unaudited)

								Accumulated other
								comprehensive income (loss)
			Additional					Minimum			Cumulative			Unrealized			Share			Total
	Share		paid-in		Retained			pension			translation			gain/(loss)			buy back			shareholders’
	capital		capital		earnings			liability			adjustment			on hedges			Program			equity
	€		€		€			€			€			€			€			€
Balance at January 1, 2001		22,065		2,184		38,706			(19	)		3,540			631			—			67,107
Dividends paid						(4,319	)														(4,319	)
Bonds converted		439		637																	1,076
Net income						18,871															18,871
Components of other comprehensive income (loss)									19			1,088			(440	)					667
Comprehensive income																					19,538
Balance at December 31, 2001		22,504		2,821		53,258			—			4,628			191			—			83,402
Dividends paid						(4,923	)														(4,923	)
Net income						17,535															17,535
Components of other comprehensive income (loss)									(656	)		(3,068	)		218						(3,506	)
Comprehensive income																					14,029
Balance at December 31, 2002		22,504		2,821		65,870			(656	)		1,560			409			—			92,508
Dividends paid						(4,903	)														(4,903	)
Share buy back																		(~~805~~1,792	)		(~~805~~1,792	)
Net income six months of 2003						3,604															3,604
Net income nine months of 2003						6,672															6,672
Components of other comprehensive income (loss)									—			(1,~~521~~936	)		~~(33~~34	)					(1,~~554~~902	)
Comprehensive income																					24,~~050~~770
Balance at June 30, 2003		22,504		2,821		64,571			(656	)		39			376			(805	)		88,850
Balance at September 30, 2003		22,504		2,821		67,639			(656	)		(376	)		443			(1,792	)		90,583

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)

			Six months ended June 30,
		Nine months ended September 30,
		2003	~~2003~~			2002	~~2002~~
		€	€			€	€
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income			6,672	~~3,604~~			8,697	~~5,591~~
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Depreciation		3,057	~~2,097~~			3,551	~~2,356~~
	Gain on disposal of fixed assets		(98	~~(71~~)	)		(18	~~(15~~)	)
	Provision for doubtful accounts		574	~~457~~			509	~~400~~
Effects of changes in assets and liabilities:
	Trade accounts receivable		422	~~3,447~~			856	~~2,236~~
	Other accounts receivable		1,668	~~1,633~~			(901	~~(1,148~~)	)
	Inventories		(379	23)			(1,773	~~(1,210~~)	)
	Prepaid expenses		25	78			521	~~223~~
	Other short-term assets			48				(752	)
	Other current assets		(95	)			(218	)
	Other long-term assets		(43	~~(73~~)	)		243	~~282~~
	Accrued pension liabilities		2,191	~~1,478~~			2,170	~~1,422~~
	Accounts payable trade		2,385	~~2,217~~			(453	~~(998~~)	)
	Income tax liabilities		238	~~(34~~	)		(1,985	~~(2,235~~)	)
	Accrued other liabilities		(1,114	~~(1,285~~)	)		(117	22)
	Customer deposits		(643	~~(1,142~~)	)		(381	~~(263~~)	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			14,860	~~12,477~~			10,701	~~5,911~~
Cash flow from investing activities:
	Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets		170	~~136~~			159	~~100~~
	Capital expenditures		(627	~~(473~~)	)		(2,106	~~(1,484~~)	)
	Acquisition of business assets			—				(2,403	)
	Purchase of business assets		—				(2,403	)
Net cash used in investing activities				(337	)			(3,787	)
	Minority interests		(130	)			—
Cash flow from financing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities			(587	)			(4,350	)
	Dividend payment			(4,903	)			(4,923	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
	Repayment of loan			(9,037	)			(645	)
	Dividend payment		(4,903	)			(4,923	)
	Share buy back			(805	)			—
	Repayment of loan		(9,037	)			(1,291	)
	Bonds payable converted (repayments)			(13	)			—
	Share buy back		(1,792	)			—
Net cash used in financing activities				(14,758	)			(5,568	)
	Bonds payable converted — issuance/(repayments)		(13	)			90
Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income adjustments				(1,554	)			(686	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(15,745	)			(6,124	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents				(4,172	)			(4,130	)
Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income adjustments			(1,902	)			(857	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year				72,264				65,035
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(3,374	)			(630	)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period				68,092				60,905
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year			72,264				65,035
Non-cash transactions:
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			68,890				64,405
	Repayments of convertible bonds and employee loans			51				25
Non-cash transactions:
	Convertible bonds and employee loans		(153	)			499

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

~~June~~September 30, 2003

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG and its subsidiaries (herein called “the Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations have been included. Operating results for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2003. All amounts in the accompanying ~~unaudited~~ unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in euros (“€”). For ~~further~~ further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and ~~footnotes~~ footnotes thereto included in the Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Business Overview

The Company develops, manufactures, sells and services a broad range of turbomolecular pumps, backing pumps, such as rotary vane, Roots and dry pumps, complete pumping stations, as well as customized vacuum systems. Its product portfolio also includes digital pressure gauges, complementary vacuum components and vacuum instruments, as well as components and systems for the production of ~~prerecorded~~pre-recorded and ~~rewritable~~re-writable DVDs.

Pfeiffer possesses a global sales and service network, comprising its own sales offices, subsidiaries and exclusive marketing agents. Moreover, there are also service support points in all major industrial locations throughout the world. The Company’s primary markets are located in Europe, the United States and Asia.

Listing

Since July 16, 1996 the Company’s American Depositary Receipts, each representing one Ordinary Share, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trade under the symbol PV. The depository for the ADRs was until March 12, 2002 the Bank of New York, since March 13, 2002 it is the Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas in New York. The ADRs also trade on the Berliner Freiverkehr, the Stuttgart Freiverkehr, the Frankfurt Freiverkehr, the Düsseldorf Freiverkehr and the Hamburg Freiverkehr in Germany.

The Company’s Ordinary Shares have been listed and principally traded on the Neuer Markt of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since April 15, 1998. The Neuer Markt iswas a segment of Deutsche Börse AG. OnDeutsche ~~July 1,~~Börse ~~1999~~reorganized the ~~Neuer Markt~~stock ~~introduced~~exchange ~~the~~segments in 2003 and differentiated it by a “~~NEMAX~~General 50Standard” ~~index,~~and ~~which~~a “Prime ~~contains~~Standard.” ~~fifty~~The ~~selected~~General ~~companies~~Standard ~~from~~is subject to the requirements prescribed under German law; the ~~Neuer~~Prime ~~Markt~~Standard additionally includes internationally customary transparency requirements (quarterly reporting, IAS/IFRS or U.S. ~~The~~GAAP ~~shares~~international accounting standards, presentation of ~~Pfeiffer~~a corporate ~~Vacuum~~calendar, ~~Technology~~at AGleast ~~have~~one ~~been~~analyst ~~included~~conference per year, as well as ad-hoc press releases in ~~this~~German ~~index~~and ~~since~~English). ~~its~~The ~~introduction~~Deutsche Börse AG confirmed the Company’s inclusion in the Prime Standard beginning January 1, 2003.

~~Deutsche~~In ~~Börse~~June ~~reorganized~~2003, ~~the~~all ~~stock~~previously ~~exchange~~at ~~segments~~Neuer inMarkt ~~2003~~listed ~~and differenciated~~companies itwere byintegrated ain the ~~“General~~new ~~Standard”~~segments ~~and a~~ “Prime Standard.” ~~The~~or “General ~~Standard~~ ~~is subject to the requirements prescribed under German law; the Prime~~ Standard” ~~additionally includes internationally customary transparency requirements (quarterly reporting, IAS or U.S. GAAP international accounting standards, presentation~~ of ~~a corporate calendar, at least one analyst conference per year, as well as ad-hoc press releases in German and English). The~~ Deutsche Börse AG. Consequently, ~~confirmed~~Neuer ~~the~~Markt ~~Company’s~~was ~~inclusion~~closed inon ~~the Prime Standard beginning January~~June 15, 2003.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

InAdditionally, in 2003, Deutsche Börse ~~additionally~~ introduced a new index system that was specifically tailored to the needs of investors. As of March 24, 2003 the Company belongs to the newly created TecDax Index, which includes the 30 most important technology companies. ~~It is anticipated that the NEMAX 50 Index will~~ ~~continue to be calculated in parallel until year-end 2004 in order to assure~~ ~~the continuity of financial instruments issued on this basis.~~

All ordinary shares have been issued in bearer form.

New U.S. Legislation

As a result of the Company’s listing at New York Stock Exchange, it is subject not only to the provisions of German law (corporation, codetermination and capital market legislation) and of its own Articles of Association but also to the licensing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. American capital market legislation — specifically the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — also apply to Pfeiffer.

The Company established in March 2003 an Audit Committee. The following individuals are members of the Audit Committee:

Götz Timmerbeil, Gummersbach, Certified Public Accountant and Tax Consultant (Chairman and Financial Expert), Dr. Michael Oltmanns, Frankfurt/M., Lawyer and Tax Consultant, ~~Dr.~~ Michael Anderson, New York, Managing Director.

All members of the Audit ~~Commitee~~Committee are members of the Company’s Supervisory Board. The Company did not enter into any other service contract with the members of the Audit Committee.

Controls and Procedures

On February 26, 2002, a German government commission adopted the “German Corporate Governance Code” (“DCGK”). The corresponding legislation went into force on July 26, 2002. The DCGK governs the publication of annual and quarterly reports, defines the Management Board’s information and reporting obligations to the Supervisory Board and governs the formation of audit committees dealing with accounting, risk management, the issuance of auditing commissions to independent auditors, conflicts of interest of Supervisory Board members and other matters. The Company has incorporated the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code into its corporate strategy. More detailed information about DCGK is published on the Company’s internet-homepage (www: .pfeiffer-vacuum.de).

The Company has a risk management system in place that enables existing risks to be identified and correctly treated early on. Methods of avoiding, reducing and securing risks are developed and implemented. The risk early warning system is regularly reviewed for its fundamental suitability for identifying developments that could endanger the continued existence of the Company. The Company’s risk coordinator is responsible for compiling timely risk reports and forwarding them to the risk committee, comprising the Management Board, department heads and the risk coordinator. The risk coordinator is also responsible for monitoring the adopted measures. The respective department heads bear the responsibility for instituted measures. The department heads are required to comment on risk development on a quarterly basis.

In 2002, the Company’s Reporting Manual was revised and provided to the ~~managements~~management of the consolidated companies.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

All annual and quarterly reports are reviewed by the Company’s Management Board prior to publication. In accordance with German law, the members of the Management Board confirm through their signatures that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, all required information is contained therein and that they have no knowledge of any material irregularities that could negatively impact the Company’s operating or financial results. All annual and quarterly reports are also provided to all members of the Supervisory Board and the Audit Committee prior to publication. Furthermore, all members of the Supervisory Board receive comprehensive information about all material business transactions, the order situation and the results of all consolidated companies in the form of a detailed monthly reporting system.

Auditors

In the annual general meeting of the Company the Supervisory Board proposed and the shareholders elected KPMG Deutsche Treuhandgesellschaft AG, Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, located Frankfurt/M., to its auditing company for the year 2003.

Management Board

Effective April 1, 2003, the Supervisory Board appointed Amandus Waterkamp, Rheinbreitbach/Germany as member of the Management Board, in accordance with the German Stock Corporation Law (Aktiengesetz) and the Articles of Association of the Company.

A. Waterkamp is 50 years old and holds a Master degree in Telecommunication Engineering and a further Master degree in Business Administration and Finance. With an active career that spans more than 25 years, A. Waterkamp has held executive business functions with international responsibility at various German companies, most recently as the member of the management board responsible for finance, controlling and IT at an internationally operating corporate group. In addition to the customary responsibilities in finance and controlling — including cost and profitability control — A. Waterkamp enjoys a broad range of experience in the fields of equity investment management, corporate acquisitions and sales, risk management, internal auditing and information technology.

Wilfried Glaum, member of the Management Board and Chief Financial Officer, retired end of June 2003. He served more than 31 years for the Company.

Beginning July 1, 2003 Mr. Waterkamp assumed Mr. Glaum’s duties as Chief Financial Officer of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG.

Adoption of New Accounting Rules

In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS No. 143”), which addresses the financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs.

The provisions of this Statement are effective for the Company beginning June 2002. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, was issued in July 2002. SFAS No. 146 replaces current accounting literature and requires the recognition of costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The provisions of the Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002.

The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

~~SFAS~~In ~~No. 146,~~May ~~“Accounting~~2003 ~~for~~the ~~Costs~~Financial ~~Associated~~Accounting ~~with~~Standards ~~Exit~~Board ~~or Disposal Activities”, was~~ issued ~~in July 2002.~~ SFAS No. ~~146 replaces current accounting~~150 ~~literature~~“Accounting ~~and~~for ~~requires~~Certain ~~the~~Financial ~~recognition~~Instruments ~~of costs associated~~ with ~~exit~~Characteristics orof both ~~disposal~~Liabilities ~~activities~~and ~~when~~Equity”. ~~they~~This ~~are~~statement ~~incurred~~establishes ~~rather~~standards ~~than~~for athow ~~the~~an ~~date of~~issuer ~~commitment~~classifies toand anmeasures ~~exit~~certain orfinancial ~~disposal~~instruments ~~plan.~~with ~~The~~characteristics ~~provisions~~ of ~~the Statement are~~ ~~effective~~both ~~for~~liabilities ~~exit~~and ~~or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002~~equity. The adoption of this ~~statement~~Statement did not have a material ~~effect~~impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2003			2002
	(€ in thousands)
Raw materials		78,~~935~~106			7,078
Work-in-process		109,~~079~~762			10,018
Finished products		910,~~544~~113			10,501
Reserves		(5,~~178~~199	)		(5,194	)
Total inventories — net		22,~~380~~782			22,403

The total inventories ~~are~~as ~~flat~~at toSeptember 30, ~~the~~2003 ~~prior~~increased ~~year’s~~slightly ~~amount.~~compared Anto the ~~increase~~previous inyear. ~~the~~ Increased raw materials ~~was~~were offset by decreased work-in-process and finished products.

Stock-Based Compensation — Convertible Bonds

SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure”, was issued on December 31, 2002. Statement 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, to provide alternative methods of transition to Statement 123’s fair-value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Statement 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of Statement 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”. Statement 148’s amendment of the transition and annual disclosure requirements of Statement 123 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, with earlier application permitted. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

As permitted under SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, the Company applies the intrinsic value-based method in accordance with APB 25 for its employee convertible bonds stock-based compensation plans. Under APB 25, the Company records no expenses relating to the convertible bonds since the conversion price is equal to or greater than the market price of the Company’s ordinary share on the date of grant.

Employee Participation Program, Term: 2000 through 2005

Within the scope of an employee participation program, in July 2000 the Company issued 4,400 convertible bonds valued at € 0.6 million at an issue price of 100% to members of management and salaried employees of the Company and its subsidiaries in Germany and other countries. The conversion feature entitles the bearer to convert each bond into 50 non-par value shares of the Company.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

The conversion price is based upon 110% of the average closing price on the Frankfurt Stock exchange for the last ten trading days prior to the resolution by the Management Board to issue the convertible bonds. Accordingly, the conversion price for the July 2000 issue was set at € 48.03 per share and includes the bond par value per equivalent share of € 2.56. There were ~~160~~120,000 option shares, related to convertible bonds for the 2000 issue, outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2003. Fair value at the date of grant was € 10.64 per common ~~share~~ share option.

Beginning in July 2002, each holder of convertible bonds can convert up to 30% of such bonds to common stock, in July 2003 up to 60% and in July 2004 up to 100%. The final conversion date is December 9, 2005. Conversion is only possible during specific periods of time. The convertible bonds bear interest at 6% p.a. and are redeemable at par on December 10, 2005, unless previously converted. The bonds are to be returned at par upon termination of employment.

Employees were given the opportunity to finance the purchase of the convertible bonds with interest-bearing employee loans. These loans are classified as other long-term assets in the balance sheet and are repayable upon conversion or return.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2003, employees had returned 1,200 of these convertible ~~bonds~~ bonds having a par value of € 153,600 and correspondingly repaid the related ~~employee~~ employee loans.

Employee Participation Program, Term: 2002 through 2007

Within the scope of a further employee participation program, in July 2002, the Company issued 4,600 convertible bonds valued at € 0.6 million at an issue price of 100% to members of management and salaried employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The conversion feature entitles the bearer to convert each bond into 50 non-par shares of Company stock. The conversion price is based on 110% of the average closing price on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange for the last ten trading days prior to issuance. The conversion price for the July 2002 issue was set at € 42.86 per share and includes the bond par value per equivalent share of € 2.56. There were 210,000 option shares, related to the convertible bonds for the 2002 issue, outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2003. ~~Fair~~ Fair value at the date of grant was € 10.35 per common share option.

Each holder of convertible bonds can convert up to 30% of such bonds to common stock for the first time following the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2004, up to 60% following the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2005 and up to 100% following the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2006. The final conversion date is December 9, 2007. Conversion is only possible during specific periods of time.

The convertible bonds bear interest at 6% p.a. and are redeemable at par on December 10, 2007, unless previously converted. The bonds are to be returned at par upon termination of employment. Employees were given the opportunity to finance the purchase of the convertible bonds with an interest-bearing employee loan. These loans are classified as other long-term assets in the balance sheet and are repayable upon conversion or return.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2003, employees had returned ~~400~~100 of these convertible bonds having a par value of € 5112,~~200~~800 and correspondingly repaid the related employee loans.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Accounting for Stock Based Compensation

A summary of option shares related to the convertible bonds is as follows:

				Weighted
				Weighted Average
	Number of Shares			~~Average~~ Exercise Price
	Outstanding			~~Price~~ per Share
				€
Convertible shares outstanding January 1, 2002		220,000			48.03
Granted		230,000			42.86
Exercised		0			0
Forfeited		(55,000	)		46.62
Convertible shares outstanding December 31, 2002		395,000			45.22
Granted		0			0
Exercised		0			0
Forfeited		(2565,000	)		47.0063
Convertible shares outstanding June 30, 2003		370,000			45.10
Convertible shares outstanding September 30, 2003		330,000			44.74

Shares exercisable at ~~June~~September 30, 2003 totaled 4872,000.

SFAS 123 requires disclosure of pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share as if the Company had accounted for its stock-based compensation to employees using the fair value method.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in 2002 and 2000: Risk-free interest rates ranging from 4% to 5%; expected lives ranging from 4.5 to 6 years; expected dividend yield of 1% to 2%; and expected volatility ranging from 30% to 40%.

For pro forma purposes, the estimated fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards is amortized over the vesting period. For the years 2003 and 2002, the fair value method did not materially impact net income or earnings per share.

Derivatives and Hedging Transactions

Effective January 1, 1999, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 133 issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in accounting for its forward currency hedging activities as cash flow hedges. SFAS No. 133 requires the Company to recognize derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities at their fair values. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through current income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in fair value are either offset against current income or recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair market value of the derivative transactions (hedging contracts) will continue to be recognized in the corresponding asset or liability items of the balance sheet until the forecasted transaction is recognized in earnings.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the exposure of its forecasted sales to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These forward contracts are limited to currencies in which the Company has significant sales that are denominated in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollars ~~and British pounds~~) and are designed to protect specifically against the impact of changes in exchange rates on these sales.

The Company has assessed these contracts to be highly effective hedges of the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on its sales. The Company does not engage in speculative hedging for investment purposes. The maturities for all forward contracts are aligned with the date the sales are anticipated to occur. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2003 no contracts held by the Company had a maturity date greater than ~~twelve~~fifteen months from the contract dates. The Company’s derivative contracts result in little to no ineffectiveness due to the nature of the foreign currency forward hedging activities.

All of the Company’s contracts are marked to market at period end using quoted forward rates. The fair value recorded in other assets at ~~June~~September 30, 2003 ~~was~~ was approximately € ~~616~~ 726,000. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2003 the notional amount of the forward contracts was approximately € 10 11.02 million. All realized gains and losses upon settlement of foreign currency forward contracts are recorded in the income statement as foreign exchange gains/(losses). The Company performs ~~ongoing~~ ongoing credit evaluations of the parties to these contracts and enters into ~~contracts~~ contracts only with well-established financial institutions.

Earnings per Ordinary and Diluted Share and ADR

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share and ADR:

	Three months ended				~~Six~~Nine months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	September 30,				September 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
Numerator:
Net income (in thousands €)		~~878~~3,068		23,~~651~~106		36,~~604~~672		58,~~591~~697
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted-average shares		8,772,928		8,790,600		8,781,764		8,790,600
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted average shares		8,742,158		8,790,600		8,769,003		8,790,600
Effect of dilutive securities:
Convertible bonds		—		—		—		—
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions		8,~~772~~742,~~928~~158		8,790,600		8,~~781~~769,~~764~~003		8,790,600
Basic earnings per share and ADR (€)		0.1035		0.3035		0.4176		0.6499
Diluted earnings per share and ADR (€)		0.1035		0.3035		0.4176		0.6499

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Share Ownership

The following table shows (known to the Company) the number of Ordinary Shares, ADR and Convertible Bonds of the Company as of ~~June~~September 30, 2003 by ~~all~~ all members of the Supervisory Board and the Management Board:

	Ordinary				Convertible
Members of the Supervisory Board	Shares		ADRs		Bonds
Dr. Michael Oltmanns		100		0		0
Michael J. Anderson		0		0		0
Prof. Dr. Klaus Jürgen Kügler		0		0		0
Prof. Dr. Klaus-Jürgen Kügler		0		0		0
Götz Timmerbeil		0		0		0
Edgar Keller		0		0		0
Günter Schneider		80		0		0

Employees

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2003 the Company employed ~~778~~771 people, ~~584~~585 of which are in in Germany and ~~194~~186 of which are in other countries.

Headcount	~~June~~September 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
	Germany				Foreign Countries
Production		~~288~~293		~~305~~310		57		5859
Research and Development		8493		88101		32		4
Selling and Marketing		46116		55129		9893		~~107~~106
Administration		~~166~~83		~~172~~81		3634		3533
Total		~~584~~585		~~620~~621		~~194~~186		~~204~~202

The Company’s manpower dropped in 2003 by 5.6.3%. ~~primary~~This ~~due~~was toprimarily the consequence of fluctuation and reorganization, ~~like~~ termination of temporary personnel contracts, ~~reorganizations~~ and retirements without hiring of new staff.

~~Additionally,~~Beginning ~~beginning~~ January 2003 the Company introduced in its German factories a new flexible working hours model, to retain its qualified personal. The basis of the flexitime model is to decrease or increase the working time depending on the rate of capacity utilisation using the time spread of the whole year.

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Additionally, in August 2003 the Management Board and the Works Council of the Asslar facility agreed to reduce the working time by 2.5 hours weekly and the corresponding salaries of the pay scale employees. Those staff members to whom the regular pay scale does not apply accepted weekly 2.5 hours overtime without compensation. Both agreements are limited in time for 6 months, beginning September 01, 2003.

Goodwill

The Company adopted the Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in the first quarter of 2002. During the end of the second quarter 2003, the Company performed the second of the required impairment tests of goodwill using the fair value based test; no impairment of goodwill resulted from this test.

Segment Information

The Company evaluates the success and performance of its subsidiaries on the basis of their income before income tax. The accounting principles used in regional reporting are identical to those described in the Basis of Presentation.

The Company’s business activities include the development, manufacture, sale and service of vacuum pumps, vacuum components and instruments, as well as vacuum systems and production equipment used in the manufacturing of DVDs. The subsidiaries in the individual countries are independent legal entities with their own management. Consequently, segment reporting is therefore country-based.

Information concerning the Company’s geographic locations is summarized as follows:

		Three months ended						~~Six~~Nine months ended
		June 30,						June 30,
		September 30,						September 30,
		2003			2002			2003			2002
		(in thousands €)						(in thousands €)
Net Sales
Germany
	Unaffiliated		1416,~~415~~734			1617,~~074~~664			3047,~~349~~083			3148,~~237~~901
	Intercompany		810,~~759~~469			1211,~~356~~824			1930,~~966~~435			2335,~~589~~413
			23,174			28,430			50,315			54,826
			27,203			29,488			77,518			84,314
Europe excluding Germany			9,~~560~~871			10,~~234~~227			2030,~~925~~796			2232,~~435~~662
United States			78,~~200~~468			98,~~398~~875			1423,~~616~~084			1827,~~649~~524
Rest of World			~~718~~901			~~1,163~~935			12,~~549~~450			12,~~774~~709
			40,652			49,225			87,405			97,684
			46,443			49,525			133,848			147,209
Intercompany eliminations			(910,~~153~~804	)		(12,~~729~~169	)		(2031,~~768~~572	)		(2436,~~187~~356	)
Total			3135,~~499~~639			3637,~~496~~356			66102,~~637~~276			73110,~~497~~853
Operating profit
Germany			160			3,068			2,273			5,983
Europe excluding Germany			472			425			1,142			1,028
United States			492			500			1,040			1,302
Rest of World			110			338			309			350
			1,234			4,331			4,764			8,663
Intercompany eliminations			114			(187	)		(24	)		31
Total			1,348			4,144			4,740			8,694

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)


	Three months ended					Nine months ended
	September 30,					September 30,

	2003		2002			2003		2002

	(in thousands €)					(in thousands €)
*Operating profit*
Germany		3,238		3,129			5,511		9,112
Europe excluding Germany		712		256			1,854		1,284
United States		910		1,033			1,950		2,335
Rest of World		64		166			373		516

		4,924		4,584			9,688		13,247
Intercompany eliminations		110		(339	)		86		(308	)

Total		5,034		4,245			9,774		12,939

Income Tax Expense

Under German corporate tax law, taxes on income are composed of corporate taxes, trade taxes and an additional surtax. ~~The Company estimates its German~~ ~~statutory tax rate within the year 2003 at 39%.~~

Effective January 1, 2002, a corporation and trade tax entity with corresponding profit and loss transfer agreements was established for the consolidated German companies. Additionally, the Company had a claim to a tax credit on distributed earnings in 2003 for the fiscal year 2002. In conformity to the German Tax Legislation this claim reduced the income tax expense and the income tax rate for the year 2002.

On April 11, 2003 the German Tax Authorities passed a resolution — effective April 12, 2003 — regarding the refund of corporation tax credits resulting from distributed earnings to the shareholders. The Company’s dividend payment for the year 2002 (within 2003) is no longer eligible for tax relief. Subsequently, the Company’s rights of claim for the year 2002 are invalidated. The Company deleted the refund of the corporation tax for 2002 amounting to approximately € 0.9 million in 2003 and consequently the Company’s combined tax rate of the year 2003 is burdened with this amount and increased to approximately 47.0%. Additionally there is no claim for reimbursement of the corporation tax 2003 due to an eventually expected dividend payment for the year 2003 within 2004.

Due to this new legislation the Company’s expected effective tax rate in Germany for years beginning 2004 will be approximately the statutory rate of 39.0%, only reduced by the benefits in consequence of the trade tax entity and the profit and loss transfer agreements in Germany.

Beginning December 31, 2005 under the new tax legislation it is possible, to claim a ~~partly~~partial reimbursement of the corporation tax depending on future dividend payments.

The effective tax rate for the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 was 39.0%.

Acquisition

At July 31, 2003 the Company acquired 250 registered shares of Pfeiffer Vacuum Systems International AG in Zuzwil/Swiss. The purchase price was 1 Swiss Franc. The Company owns now 100% of the share capital. The proforma effect of this acquisition is not significant to the Company’s operational and financial condition.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 (Percentages calculated based on amounts in thousands €)

Net Sales

The following table summarizes the Company’s net sales by geographical area:

Three months ended

June 30, 2003

June 30, 2002

September 30, 2003

September 30, 2002

(in thousands €)

Net Sales

Germany

811,~~581~~238

2731.25

912,~~521~~607

2633.17

Europe excluding Germany

10,~~550~~483

3329.54

11,~~587~~782

31.75

United States

78,~~225~~458

2223.97

98,~~335~~745

2523.64

Rest of World

5,~~143~~460

1615.4

64,~~053~~222

1611.64

Total

3135,~~499~~639

100.0

3637,~~496~~356

100.0

~~Total~~The ~~net~~Company ~~sales~~recorded ~~decreased~~in bythe €third ~~5.0 million,~~quarter or2003 ~~13.7%,~~net ~~from~~sales €revenues ~~36.5 million~~amounting into ~~the~~€ ~~three months ended June~~35.6 30million, ~~2002~~compared to € 3137.54 million in the ~~three~~prior ~~months ended~~year’s ~~June 30, 2003~~period. ~~The major part of this decrease amounting to € 2.1 million~~Net ~~was~~sales ~~recorded~~decreased in ~~the~~Germany ~~U.S.~~by ~~from~~ € 91.34 million, in ~~the~~Europe ~~second~~excluding ~~quarter~~Germany ofby ~~2002 to~~ € 71.23 million ~~in the second quarter of 2003~~. In consequence of the weakness of the U.S. dollar against the euro the Company’s net sales were adversely impacted by the effect of changes in these exchange rates., ~~The~~amounting ~~exchange~~to ~~rate accounted for~~ approximately € 1.72 million, oralthough ~~34.0% of~~ the Company’s ~~total~~net sales ~~decrease~~ revenue in the U.S. increased by U.S. dollar 0.6 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003. In ~~fact,~~ the ~~decrease~~rest of ~~the~~world ~~Company’s net~~(mainly ~~sales revenue~~ in Asia) the ~~U.S.~~Company ~~was~~increased ~~primarily~~its ~~due~~sales toby ~~exchange~~€ ~~rate differences~~1. ~~Additionally~~2 million ~~the~~or ~~worldwide~~29.3%. ~~economic~~The ~~slow down led to decreased sales in the~~ Company’s expects ~~primary~~these ~~markets.~~first Inpositive ~~Europe~~factors ~~including~~are ~~Germany~~an ~~the~~indication ~~sales~~for ~~decreased~~a bypotential €economic 2upturn.~~0 million in the current quarter.~~

InSales ~~most~~in ofvacuum ~~the~~instruments ~~Company’s~~and ~~product~~components ~~groups sales droppings were accounted. Turbo pump sales~~ decreased by € 02.70 million. Increased ~~from~~sales €were ~~13.5 million~~recorded in ~~the~~fore ~~second~~vacuum ~~quarter 2002~~pumps to by € 12 0.85 million inand ~~the second quarter 2003. Sales~~ in ~~fore vacuum pumps~~ ~~decreased~~systems by € 0.75 million,. ~~sales~~The inservice ~~vacuum~~revenues ~~instruments and vacuum components~~ decreased byfrom € 16.15 million ~~and sales~~ in the ~~systems~~third ~~decreased~~quarter 2002 by € 10.1 to € 6.4 million~~. Additionally,~~ in ~~this~~the ~~quarter~~current aperiod; compared ~~decline~~to inthe ~~service~~second ~~revenue~~quarter by2003 an increase of € 0.94 million was ~~recorded,~~ ~~contrary to the trend in prior periods~~recorded.

The Company was not able to withdraw the worldwide negative trends characterized by a slowdown in the economy, dropping sales and increasing or stagnating costs.

Order intake and Order backlog

Orders received amounted to € 3536.2 million in the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2003 and ~~decreased~~increased by € 41.28 million, from € 39 34.4 million in the ~~three~~ three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002. ~~The~~Order ~~main~~intake ~~part~~ of ~~the~~turbo ~~decrease~~pumps ~~was~~increased ~~recorded in turbo~~by ~~pumps (~~€ 34.81 million). ~~and~~Order ~~vacuum~~intake ~~components~~of systems and vacuum instruments (€and ~~1.9 million),~~components ~~partly~~decreased ~~offset~~ by ~~an increase of orders in vacuum systems (~~€ 12.91 million). ~~The order~~Service ~~intake~~orders ~~was~~received ~~adversely~~are ~~effected~~flat bycompared ~~changes~~to of the previous ~~exchange~~year’s ~~rate~~quarter. The weakness of the U.S. dollar against the euro. impacted ~~This~~adversely ~~decrease~~the ~~accounted~~order ~~for~~intake by approximately € 1.75 million ~~or 40~~.~~5% of~~ ~~the total decrease in orders received.~~

The Company’s backlog decreased from € 25.2 million in the third quarter of 2002 by € 0.8 million to € 24.4 million in 2003. Compared to the second quarter of 2003 a small increase in orders received (by € 0.5 million) indicate a slightly positive trend.

Contracts are included in backlog only if they represent firm orders and include firm shipping schedules. Generally, the backlog position at any particular time should not be construed to represent future levels of sales and orders.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company’s backlog decreased from € 27.9 million in 2002 by € 4.0 million to € 23.9 million in 2003 and was also adversely impacted by € 0.6 million exchange rate differences due to the strong euro against the U.S. dollar.

Contracts are included in backlog only if they represent firm orders and include firm shipping schedules. The backlog position at any particular time should not be construed to represent future levels of sales and orders generally.

Gross Profit

Gross profit decreased by € 31.4 million or 208.21% from € 16.49 million in ~~the~~ the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 to € 1315.05 million in the comparable period in 2003. The Company’s gross margin decreased from 4445.82% in 2002 to 4143.45% in 2003. An essential part of this decrease (€ 0.9 million) is due to ~~negative exchange~~the ~~rate~~weakness ~~differences~~of ~~between~~ the ~~strong euro against the~~ U.S. dollar ~~and~~against ~~accounted for~~the ~~approximately € 1~~euro.~~4 million.~~ Additionally the ~~slightly~~slight ~~declining~~ decline in the plant utilization rate due to the weakening of the economy led to a lower gross profit.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expenses decreased from € 56.90 million in the ~~second~~third quarter 2002 to € 54.08 million in the ~~second~~third quarter 2003. As a percentage of sales, selling and marketing expenses decreased from 16.30% to 1613.04%. The manpower of the sales and marketing force ~~decreased~~dropped in 2003 by 11.1% and led to a decrease in selling and marketing expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses ~~amount~~amounted to € 3.2.7 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003 and ~~increased~~decreased by € € 0.72 million from € 2.5 9 million in the prior year’s period. As a percentage of sales, general and ~~administrative~~ administrative expenses ~~increased~~decreased from 7.09% in 2002 to 107.17% in 2003. The ~~general and~~ ~~administrative~~availment ~~expenses~~of inservices ~~the~~by ~~second~~third ~~quarter~~parties ~~2003~~(temporary ~~turned~~work) ~~back~~decreased toand ~~the~~led ~~normal~~to ~~level. The Company payed within the second quarter 2002 employees profit sharings/benefits which were~~ lower ~~than~~general ~~the estimated~~ and ~~accrued~~administrative ~~amounts, due to its economic situation~~expenses. ~~The retransfer of the provisions led to a positive~~ ~~effect.~~

Research and Development

Research and development expenses decreased from € 2.65 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2002 to € 2.40 million in the ~~second~~third quarter 2003. ~~Due~~The ~~to the~~research ~~lower~~and ~~net~~development ~~sales~~expenses ~~revenue~~as inpercentage ~~2003,~~of the ~~percentage~~net of sales ~~was~~revenue 7decreased from 6.07% in 2002 ~~and increased~~ to 75.86% in ~~2003. Nevertheless,~~ the ~~Company~~current ~~depends~~period. toThe aCompany’s ~~significant extent~~intention onis ~~continuing technological advances in vacuum pump design and~~to ~~manufacturing~~invest ~~and has invested~~ in the needs of future markets, ~~improving~~to ~~its market~~hold ~~position~~it’s ~~and~~technical ~~entering~~advantages, ~~new markets. The Company has also been investing~~to inimprove ~~products~~it’s tomarket beposition ~~used in the manufacturing of prerecorded~~ and ~~rewritable~~to ~~DVDs (coating~~enter ~~under~~new ~~vacuum)~~markets. It expects research and development expenses in future will correspond to the current level, approximately. The Company expenses all research and development costs as they are incurred.

Operating Profit

Operating profit ~~decreased~~increased from € 4.12 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 to € 15.30 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003. As a percentage of sales the operating profit ~~decreased~~increased from 11.4% to 4 14.31%, primarily as the result of the factors discussed above. The operating profit is burdened with the negative effect of the exchange rate changes due to the strong euro against the U.S. dollar amounting to approximately € 0.7 million.

Foreign exchange gain/loss

The Company recorded in both, the third quarter 2002 and the third quarter 2003, exchange gains amounting to approximately € 0.4 million.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The operating profit is also burdened with a negative effect of the exchange rate changes due to the strong euro against the U.S. dollar amounting to approximately € 1.0 million or 35.7% of the total decrease in operating profit.

Foreign exchange gain/loss

The Company recorded in the second quarter 2002 exchange losses amounting to € 0.2 million and in the second quarter of 2003 foreign exchange gains amounting to € 0.9 million. According to U.S. GAAP unrealised exchange gains amounting to € 0.5 million are included in the three months period ended June 30, 2003, due to the strengthening of the euro against the U.S. dollar.

Income Tax Expense

In the item “Income Tax Expense” (page 16) the Company defined the effects of the new German tax legislation.

The claim of the tax reimbursement for the dividend payment to the ~~shareholders~~ shareholders for the year 2002, paid in June 2003, is invalidated. The Company has to expense an amount of approximately € 0.9 million corporation tax within ~~the~~ the year 2003. Consequently, the effective tax rate of the ~~second~~third quarter of 2003 is burdened with this records and increased to 6647.30%. The effective tax rate for the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 was 39.0%.

Net income

~~Net~~With ~~income decreased by~~ € 13.81 million, ~~from~~the €net ~~2.7 million~~income in the three ~~months~~ month period ended ~~June~~ September 30, ~~2002~~2003 towas €at ~~0.9 million~~the same level as in the ~~current~~previous ~~period~~year, ~~due~~despite the increased income tax rate. As a result of higher sales and reduced costs the Company was able to increase it’s income in the ~~factors~~third ~~discussed~~quarter ~~above~~2003 compared to the second quarter 2003 by € 2.2 million.

Net income per Ordinary Share and ADR was € 0.1035 (basic) and € 0.1035 (diluted) in both, the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003 ~~compared~~and ~~to € 0.30 (basic) as well as € 0.30 (diluted)~~ in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 (Percentages calculated based on amounts in thousands €)

Net Sales

The following table summarizes the Company’s net sales by geographical area:

Six months ended

Nine months ended

June 30, 2003

June 30, 2002

September 30, 2003

September 30, 2002

(in thousands €)

Net Sales

Germany

1729,~~855~~093

2628.84

1932,~~686~~293

2629.81

Europe excluding Germany

2333,~~146~~629

3432.79

2436,~~527~~309

3332.48

United States

1423,~~609~~067

2122.96

1827,~~536~~281

2524.26

Rest of World

1116,~~027~~487

16.61

1014,~~748~~970

1413.65

Total

66102,~~637~~276

100.0

73110,~~497~~853

100.0

Total net sales revenues decreased by € 68.96 million or 97.37% from € 73110.5 9 million in the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 to € 66 102.63 million in the nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2003. ~~The~~Sales ~~major~~in ~~part~~Germany ofdecreased by € 3.2 million from € 32.3 million in the ~~sales~~year 2002 to € 29.1 million in the year 2003. Also in Europe (excluding Germany) a decrease ~~amounting~~in tonet sales by € 2.7 million from € 36.3 million in the three quarters of 2002 to € 33.96 million ~~was~~in three quarters of 2003 was recorded. The net sales in the U.S. accounted for € 23.1 million and is€ 27.3 million ~~primarily~~in ~~due~~the tonine months ended September 2003 and September 2002, respectively. The revenue of the sales subsidiary in the U.S. increased in U.S. dollar, but the weakness of the U.S. dollar against the euro. led ~~The~~to ~~adversely~~an ~~impact~~adverse ~~accounted~~currency ~~for~~exchange difference amounting to approximately € 3.4 .6 million. ~~and~~This effect reflects 49 approximately 53.15% of the total sales decrease. Sales in the ~~total~~rest ~~net~~of ~~sales~~world ~~revenue~~(mainly Asia) increased by € 1.5 million or 10.1% from € 15.0 million in 2002 to € 16.5 in 2003.

~~Sales~~In inmost ~~Germany~~of the Company’s product groups decreased sales were accounted. Turbo pump sales decreased by € 13.87 million ~~or 9.3%~~ from € 1941.70 million in the ~~first~~ ~~half~~nine ~~year~~months ended September 30, 2002 to € 1737.92 million in the ~~first~~respective ~~half~~period ~~year~~in 2003. Sales ~~Also~~ in ~~Europe~~ ~~(excluding~~fore ~~Germany)~~vacuum apumps ~~decrease~~decreased ~~in net sales~~ by € 1 0.46 million, ~~from~~sales €in ~~24.5~~vacuum ~~million~~instruments inand ~~the~~vacuum ~~first~~components ~~six~~decreased ~~months~~by ~~of 2002 to~~ € 23 4.18 million, sales in ~~the first six~~service ~~months~~decreased ofby ~~2003~~€ ~~was recorded~~0. ~~However~~7 million, ~~sales~~partly inoffset ~~the~~by ~~rest~~increased ofsales ~~world~~in ~~increased slightly~~systems by € 0 1.32 million ~~in the respective periods~~.

InThe ~~most of the~~ Company’s ~~product~~opinion ~~groups~~is ~~decreased~~that ~~sales~~there ~~were~~are ~~accounted.~~first ~~Turbo pump~~indications ~~sales~~for ~~decreased by € 3.2 million from € 27.9 million in the six months~~potential ~~ended~~economic ~~June 30, 2002 to € 24~~upturn.~~7 million in the respective period in 2003. Sales~~ ~~in fore vacuum pumps decreased by € 1.1 million, sales in vacuum instrument and~~ vacuum components decreased by € 2.8 million, partly offset by increased sales in systems by € 0.8 million. Additionally, in the six month period ended June 30, 2003 a decline in service revenue by € 0.5 million was recorded, contrary the trend in prior periods.

The Company was not able to withdraw the worldwide negative trends characterized by a slowdown in the economy, dropping sales and increasing or stagnating costs.

Order-intake and Order-backlog

Orders received decreased by € 5.3.5 million or 73.12%, from € 74109.82 million in in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 to € 69105.57 million in the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2003. Approximately € 35.61 million ~~(or 67.9%)~~ of ~~this~~the decrease in orders received are due to an ~~adversely~~adverse impact of exchange rate differences between the strong euro against the weak U.S. dollar.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company’s backlog shows a decrease in the comparative periods by € 4.0.8 million or ~~14.~~3.2%, from € 2725.92 million to € 2324.94 million for the periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The changes in the exchange rates of ~~the~~ the strong euro against the weak U.S. dollar accounted for approximately € 01.~~6 million~~1 million and ~~effected~~had ~~the~~a ~~backlog~~negative ~~amounts~~effect ~~negatively~~on the backlog.

Gross Profit

Gross profit decreased by € 46.82 million or 1412.75% from € 3350.10 million in the ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 to € 2843.38 million in the ~~six~~nine month ~~months~~period ended ~~June 30,~~ September 2003. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (“gross margin”) decreased from 45.1% to 42.48% in the respective periods. Declining sales and rising cost of sales led to the lower margin ~~in the period ended June 30, 2003~~. An essential part of this decrease is due to negative exchange rate differences between the strong euro against the U.S. dollar ~~and~~which accounted for approximately € 23.6 5 million. Additionally the ~~slightly~~slight ~~declining~~decline in the plant utilization rate due to the weakening of the economy led to a lower gross profit.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expenses decreased by € 02.92 million from € 1117.3 million in the first ~~half~~nine months of the year 2002 to € 1015.41 million in the first ~~half~~nine ~~year~~ months of 2003. The manpower of the sales and marketing force decreased in 2003 by 11.1% and led to a decrease in selling and marketing expenses. As a percentage of sales, selling and marketing expenses ~~increased slightly~~ decreased from 15.46% to 1514.58%. ~~The~~ ~~increase in the percentage of sales is primarily due to lower net sales~~ ~~revenues.~~

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses amount to € 69.30 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003 and increased by € 0.64 million from € 5 8.7 6 million in the prior year’s period. As a percentage of sales, general and ~~administrative~~ administrative expenses increased from 7.78% in 2002 to 98.48% in 2003~~. The general and administrative expenses in the six months ended June 30~~, ~~2003~~due ~~turned back~~ to ~~the~~ ~~normal level. The Company payed within~~ the ~~second quarter 2002 employees~~ ~~profit sharings/benefits which were~~ lower ~~than~~net ~~the~~sales ~~estimated and accrued amounts, due to its economic situation~~revenue. ~~The retransfer of the provisions led to~~ ~~a positive effect.~~

Research and Development

Research and development expenses decreased from € 57.05 million in the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 toby € 40.87 million ~~in 2003. Due~~ to ~~the~~€ ~~lower net sales revenue in 2003, the percentage of sales was~~ 6.9%8 million in ~~2002 and increased to 7.2% in~~ 2003. ~~Nevertheless, the Company depends to a significant extent on~~As ~~continuing~~percentage ~~technological advances in vacuum pump design and manufacturing and has invested in the needs~~ of ~~future~~sales ~~markets, improving its market position and entering new markets. The Company has also been investing in products to be used in~~ the ~~manufacturing of prerecorded and rewritable DVDs (coating under vacuum). It expects~~ research and development expenses indecreased ~~future~~from ~~will correspond~~6.8% toin ~~the~~2002 ~~current~~to ~~level, approximately~~6.7% ~~The~~in ~~Company expenses all research and development costs as they are incurred~~2003.

The Company’s intention is to invest in the needs of future markets, to hold it’s technical advantages, to improve it’s market position and to enter new markets.

The Company expenses all research and development costs as they are incurred. It expects research and development expenses in future will correspond to the current level, approximately.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating Profit

Operating profit decreased ~~significantly~~ by € 43.02 million or 4524.5% from € 8 12.79 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 to € 49.78 million in the ~~six months~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003. As a percentage of sales, the operating profit decreased from 11.87% to 79.16%, as the result of the factors discussed above. The operating profit is ~~also~~ burdened with a negative effect of the exchange rate changes due to the strong euro against the U.S. dollar amounting to approximately € 12.85 million or 4579.58% of the total decrease in operating profit.

Interest income and interest expense

The interest income ~~and expense~~ in the ~~six~~first nine months ~~ended~~of ~~June 30,~~the year 2003 ~~are flat~~amounted to € ~~the~~1.0 million ~~prior~~and ~~year~~decreased slightly from € 1.1 million in 2002. In June 2003 the Company repaid the loan of Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau totaling approximately € 9.0 million, using its high cash position.

Foreign exchange gain/loss

The Company recorded in the ~~six~~nine month period 2002 foreign exchange ~~losses~~gains amounting to € 0.2 million and in the ~~six~~nine month period 2003 foreign exchange gains amounting to € 1.48 million. According to U.S. GAAP unrealised exchange gains amounting to € 0.89 million are included in 2003, due to the strengthening of the euro against the U.S. dollar.

Income Tax Expense

In the item “Income Tax Expense” (page 16) the Company defined the effects of the new German tax legislation.

The claim of the tax reimbursement for the dividend payment to the ~~shareholders~~ shareholders for the year 2002, paid in June 2003, is invalidated. The Company has to expense an amount of approximately € 0.9 million corporation tax within ~~the~~ the year 2003. Consequently, the effective tax rate of the ~~first~~nine ~~half~~months ~~year of~~ended September 30, 2003 is burdened with this records and increased to 47.0%. The effective tax rate for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 was 39.0%.

Net Income

Net income decreased by € 2.0 million, or 3523.53% from € 58.67 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 to € 3.6.7 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2003, primarily as a result of the factors discussed above.

Net income per Ordinary Share and ADR was € 0.4176 (basic) and € 0.4176 (diluted) in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2003 compared to € 0.6499 (basic) as well as € 0.6499 (diluted) in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s business continues to generate sufficient cash to fund its operations, including its working capital and capital expenditure requirements. In the six months ended June 30, 2003 net cash provided by operating activities totaled € 12.5 million as compared to € 5.9 million for the same period in the prior year.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~The~~Liquidity ~~increase in net cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to a decrease in trade accounts receivable, an increase in trade accounts payable to the normal level~~ and ~~the~~Capital ~~payment of income tax liabilities, offset by the~~Resources ~~decreased net income of the Company.~~

The Company’s ~~use~~business ofcontinues to generate sufficient cash into ~~investing~~fund ~~activities~~its operations, ~~decreased~~including byits €working 3capital and capital expenditure requirements.4 In the nine months ended September ~~million~~30, ~~primarily~~ ~~due~~2003 tonet ~~the~~cash ~~purchase~~provided ofby ~~selected~~operating activities ~~assets~~totaled (€ 214.49 million) inas ~~the~~compared ~~prior year,~~to ~~and lower capital expenditures (~~€ 0 10.57 million) for the same period in ~~2003~~the prior year.

The increase in net cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to the balancing of income tax receivables, an increase in trade accounts payable to the normal level and the decreased net income of the Company.

The Company’s use of cash in investing activities decreased by € 3.8 million, primarily due to the purchase of selected assets (€ 2.4 million) in the prior year, and lower capital expenditures (€ 0.6 million) in 2003.

The investments have been financed by the Company’s cash reserves.

The increase in cash flow used by financing activities, amounting to approximately € 915.27 million, (in 2002 € 6.1 million) is primarily a result of the ~~the~~ repayment of the long-term debt totaling € 9.0 million. The Company used its high cash position, to repay its loan due to Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau. Additionally the Company started a share buy back program. The treasury stock accounted for approximately € 01.8 million and included the buy back of 3575.~~626~~136 non par value ordinary shares of the Company.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~June ~~paid~~2003, inthe ~~June~~Company ~~2003~~paid dividends to its shareholders amounting to € 4,902,785.44 for the fiscal year 2002.

The Company had no long-term debt as at ~~June~~September 30, 2003.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

~~August~~November 13, 2003

PFEIFFER VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AG

byBy: /s/ Wolfgang Dondorf Wolfgang Dondorf Chief Executive Officer By: /s/ Amandus Waterkamp Amandus Waterkamp Chief Financial Officer

by: /s/ Amandus Waterkamp

I, Wolfgang Dondorf, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this annual report on Form 6-K of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG;

2.		Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

	a)		designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

	b)		evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date”); and

	c)		presented this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation date;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

	a)		all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

	b)		any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.

~~August~~November 13, 2003

By: /s/ Wolfgang Dondorf Wolfgang Dondorf Chief Executive Officer

I, Amandus Waterkamp, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this annual report on Form 6-K of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG;

2.		Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

	a)		designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

	b)		evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date”); and

	c)		presented this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation date;

	a)		all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

	b)		any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

~~August~~November 13, 2003

By: /s/ Amandus Waterkamp Amandus Waterkamp Chief Financial Officer

Ordinary

Convertible

Members of the Management Board

Shares

Wolfgang Dondorf

Amandus Waterkamp