UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x		Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
		For the year ended December 31, 2017
		For the year ended December 31, 2018
o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
		For the transition period from to

Commission File number 000-53618

ATEL 12, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


California		20-8712853
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 989-8800

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Liability Company Units

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes o No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934. Yes o No x

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company x

Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

State the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: Not applicable

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Not applicable

The number of Limited Liability Company Units outstanding as of February 28, ~~2018~~2019 was 2,992,482

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on January 25, 2007 (“Date of Inception”) for the purpose of equipment financing and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. From its inception into the third quarter of 2013, the Company’s Managing Member was ATEL Associates 12, LLC (“AA12”), a Nevada limited liability company. Effective September 30, 2013, AA12 was merged into ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS” or “Managing Member” or “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group. The Fund may continue until December 31, 2030. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member.

The Company conducted a public offering of 20,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. As of January 24, 2008, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1.2 million), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations and continued in its development stage activities until transitioning to an operating enterprise during the second quarter of 2008. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and are released to the Fund only when aggregate subscriptions for all investors equal to at least $7.5 million. Total contributions to the Fund exceeded $7.5 million on July 15, 2008, at which time a request was processed to release the Pennsylvania escrowed amounts. The offering was terminated on September 25, 2009.

As of December 31, ~~2017~~2018, cumulative gross contributions, less rescissions and repurchases (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs, as applicable), totaling $29.9 million (inclusive of the $500 initial Member’s capital investment) have been received. As of the same date, 2,992,482 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Company’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unitholders, with any balance remaining after required minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional investments during the Reinvestment Period (ending six calendar years after the completion of the Company’s public offering of Units) and (iii) provide additional cash distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all investment portfolio assets has been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by the ATEL 12, LLC amended and restated Limited Liability Company Operating agreement dated April 3, 2007 (the “Operating Agreement”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, the Managing Member and/or its affiliates receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 6, Related party transactions, as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of the Managing Member.

On January 1, 2016, the Company commenced liquidation phase activities pursuant to the guidelines of the Operating Agreement. Prior thereto, the Company was in its acquisition phase and was making distributions on a monthly and quarterly basis. During the liquidation phase, periodic distributions are paid at the discretion of the Managing Member.

Narrative Description of Business

The Company had acquired various types of new and used equipment subject to leases and made loans secured by equipment acquired by its borrowers. The Company’s primary investment objective was to acquire investments primarily in low-technology, low-obsolescence equipment such as the core operating equipment used by companies in the manufacturing, mining and transportation industries. A portion of the portfolio would include some more technology-dependent equipment such as certain types of communications equipment, medical equipment, manufacturing equipment and office equipment. The Company sought investments in equipment or financing of equipment and business involving “green technologies” such as those involved in the following activities: materials recycling, water purification, sewage treatment pollution radiation, gas and other emission treatment, solid waste management, renewable energy generation, as well as many other similar industries and activities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Company purchased equipment under pre-existing leases or for which a lease was entered into concurrently at the time of the purchase. Through December 31, ~~2017~~2018, the Company had purchased equipment with a total acquisition price of $28.6 million. The Company had also funded investments in notes receivable totaling $5.4 million through December 31, ~~2017~~2018.

The Company’s objective was to have at least 60% of its investment portfolio (by cost) consist of equipment leased to lessees that the Manager deems to be high quality corporate credits and/or leases guaranteed by such high quality corporate credits. High quality corporate credits were lessees or guarantors who have a credit rating by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. of “Baa” or better, or the credit equivalent as determined by the Manager, or were public and private corporations with substantial revenues and histories of profitable operations, as well as established hospitals with histories of profitability or municipalities. The remaining 40% of the initial investment portfolio would include equipment lease transactions, real property single tenant net leases and other financing for companies which, although deemed creditworthy by the Manager, would not satisfy the specific credit criteria for the portfolio described above. Included in this 40% of the portfolio may be growth capital financing investments. No more than 20% of the initial portfolio, by cost, would consist of these growth capital financing investments and no more than 20% of the portfolio, by cost, would consist of real estate investments. The Company’s objective was to invest approximately 25% of its capital in assets that involve “green” technologies or applications as discussed above.

The equipment financing industry is highly competitive. Equipment manufacturers, corporations, partnerships and others offer users an alternative to the purchase of most types of equipment with payment terms that vary widely depending on the type of financing, the lease or loan term and type of equipment. The ability of the Company to keep the equipment leased and the terms of purchase, lease and sale of equipment depends on various factors (many of which neither the Managing Member nor the Company can control), such as general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation or recession, and fluctuations in supply and demand for various types of equipment resulting from, among other things, technological and economic obsolescence.

The Managing Member will use its best efforts to diversify lessees by geography and industry and to maintain an appropriate balance and diversity in the types of equipment acquired and the types of leases entered into by the Company, and will apply the following policies: (i) The Managing Member will seek to limit the amount invested in equipment or property leased to any single lessee to not more than 20% of the aggregate purchase price of investments as of the final commitment of net offering proceeds; (ii) in no event will the Company’s equity investment in equipment or property leased to a single lessee exceed an amount equal to 20% of the maximum capital from the sale of Units (or $30,000,000); and (iii) the Managing Member will seek to invest not more than 20% of the aggregate purchase price of equipment in equipment acquired from a single manufacturer. However, this last limitation is a general guideline only, and the Company may acquire equipment from a single manufacturer in excess of the stated percentage during the offering period and before the offering proceeds are fully invested, or if the Managing Member deems such a course of action to be in the Company’s best interest.

The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks leasing opportunities is North America. All of the Company’s current operating revenues and long-lived assets relate to customers domiciled in United States.

The business of the Company is not seasonal. The Company has no full time employees. Employees of the Managing Member and affiliates provide the services the Company requires to effectively operate. The cost of these services is reimbursed by the Company to the Managing Member and affiliates per the Operating Agreement.

For further information refer to the financial statements and footnotes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Equipment Leasing Activities

The Company ~~has~~had acquired a diversified portfolio of equipment. The equipment, all currently located in the United States, ~~has~~had been leased to lessees in various industries. The following tables set forth the types of equipment acquired by the Company through December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and the industries to which the assets have been leased (dollars in thousands):


Asset Types	Purchase Price Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Acquisitions
Materials handling	$	7,801		27.24	%
Transportation		4,934		17.23	%
Research		3,963		13.84	%
Manufacturing		3,518		12.29	%
Construction		2,989		10.44	%
Mining		2,893		10.10	%
Aviation		2,167		7.57	%
Other		370		1.29	%
	$	28,635		100.00	%


Industry of Lessee	Purchase Price Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Acquisitions
Business services	$	6,569		22.94	%
Gas/Coal products		4,684		16.36	%
Retail		2,903		10.14	%
Food products		2,877		10.05	%
Rubber/Miscellaneous plastics		2,764		9.65	%
Air transportation		2,167		7.57	%
Lumber/Wood products		1,680		5.87	%
Transportation services		1,644		5.74	%
Manufacturing		895		3.13	%
Chemical products		863		3.01	%
Industrial machinery		783		2.73	%
Other		806		2.81	%
	$	28,635		100.00	%

From inception to December 31, ~~2017~~2018, the Company ~~has~~had disposed of certain leased assets as set forth below (in thousands):

Asset Types	Original Equipment Cost Excluding Acquisition Fees		Sale Price		Gross Rents
Materials handling	$	6,977	$	1,375	$	7,906
Research		3,964		713		3,425
Mining		2,893		1,908		2,517
Manufacturing		12,~~780~~443		1,~~185~~258		1,~~345~~956
Construction		~~833~~2,375		~~112~~325		~~979~~2,947
Transportation		~~388~~509		~~123~~166		~~403~~529
Aviation		90		8		97
Other		227		69		440
	$	1719,~~152~~478	$	5,~~493~~822	$	1719,~~112~~817

For further information regarding the Company’s equipment lease portfolio as of December 31, ~~2017~~2018, see Note 4, Investments in equipment and leases, net, as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Notes Receivable Activities

The Company finances assets in diverse industries. The following tables set forth the types of assets financed by the Company through December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and the industries to which the assets ~~have~~had been financed (dollars in thousands):


Asset Types	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Fundings
Miscellaneous office equipment	$	3,484		65.05	%
Research		804		15.01	%
Computers		599		11.18	%
Manufacturing		400		7.47	%
Other		69		1.29	%
	$	5,356		100.00	%


Industry of Borrower	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Fundings
Health services	$	1,569		29.29	%
Electronics		1,055		19.70	%
Manufacturing		805		15.03	%
Engineering/Management		750		14.00	%
Business services		578		10.79	%
Lab equipment		399		7.45	%
Chemicals/Allied products		200		3.74	%
	$	5,356		100.00	%

From inception to December 31, ~~2017~~2018, assets financed by the Company that ~~are~~were associated with terminated loans are as follows (in thousands):


Asset Types	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Early Termination of Notes Proceeds		Total Payments Received
Miscellaneous office equipment	$	3,484	$	606	$	3,040
Research		804		258		716
Computers		599		—		760
Manufacturing		400		—		498
Other		69		53		28
	$	5,356	$	917	$	5,042

As of December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, the Company had no notes receivable.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Company does not own or lease any real property, plant or material physical properties other than the equipment held for lease as set forth in Item 1.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Company. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. No material legal proceedings are currently pending against the Company or against any of its assets.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

Item 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There are certain material conditions and restrictions on the transfer of Units imposed by the terms of the Operating Agreement. Consequently, there is no public market for Units and it is not anticipated that a public market for Units will develop. In the absence of a public market for the Units, there is no currently ascertainable fair market value for the Units.

Holders

As of December 31, 2018, a total of 912 investors were Unitholders of record in the Company.

Fund Valuation

Background to Fund Valuation

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) updated rules for the presentation of account statement values relative to pricing of Direct Placement Program (“DPP”) shares. Under FINRA Notice 15-02 (the “Notice”) the SEC approved amendments to National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) Rule 2340, Customer Account Statements, and FINRA rule 2310, which address a FINRA member firm’s participation in a public offering of a DPP. In summary, the amendments require a FINRA member firm to include in the account statements for customers holding DPP securities a per share value for the DPP. This per share value must be prepared by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service. The results of this valuation must be disclosed in the issuer’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A valuation in compliance with the Notice must be undertaken and published on at least an annual basis.

The effective date of the Notice was April 11, 2016.

Methodologies

Broker dealers are required to provide a per share estimated value on the customer account statements for each non-listed DPP security held by their customers. Such estimated value must have been developed in a manner reasonably designed to provide a reliable value. Two valuation methodologies have been defined by FINRA, which by such designation are presumed to be reliable.

Net Investment Methodology

The amendments to NASD Rule 2340(c)(1)(A) require “net investment” to be based on the “amount available for investment” percentage disclosed in the “Estimated Use of Proceeds” section of the issuer’s offering prospectus. In essence, such value is equal to the offering price less selling commissions, other offering and organization expenses, and capital reserves. This method may be used for up to 150 days following the second anniversary of a Fund breaking escrow.

Appraised Value Methodology

As amended, Rule NASD 2340(c)(1)(B) requires that the per share estimated value disclosed in an issuer’s most recent periodic or current report be based upon an appraisal of the assets and liabilities of the program by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service, in conformity with standard industry valuation practice as it relates to both the aforementioned assets and liabilities. No later than 150 days following the second anniversary of the issuer’s break of escrow for its minimum offering, this methodology must be used to establish the required estimated values.

Unit Valuation

The per Unit valuation estimate for ATEL 12, LLC has been conducted, and the results disclosed herein, in compliance with the mandates of the Notice.

For ATEL 12, LLC, its estimated value per Unit reflects the Manager’s estimate of current portfolio valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Fund, calculated on a per Unit basis, and as such, does not represent a market value for the Units and may not accurately reflect the value of the Fund Units to the Unit holders if held over time to Fund maturity.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For ATEL 12, LLC, its estimated value per Unit reflects the Manager’s estimate of current portfolio valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Fund, calculated on a per Unit basis, and as such, does not represent a market value for the Units and may not accurately reflect the value of the Fund Units to the Unit holders if held over time to Fund maturity.

In connection with any estimate of per Unit value, Unit holders and all parties are reminded that no public market for the Units exists. Additionally, in order to preserve the Fund’s pass-through status for federal income tax purposes, the Fund will not permit a secondary market or the substantial equivalent of a secondary market for the Units. In the absence of a public market for the Units, there is no currently ascertainable fair market value for the Units.

The estimate of per Unit value does not take into account any extraordinary potential future business activity of the Fund; rather the valuation represents a snapshot view of the Fund’s portfolio as of the valuation date. In addition, the Fund does not include any analysis of the distributions that have already been paid by the Fund, nor the anticipated returns to Unit holder over the full course of the Fund life cycle, which will be dependent on many factors.

Disclosure

The estimated value per Unit reported in this Form 10-K has been calculated using the “Appraised Value Methodology” described above under “Methodologies” above, as of December 31, ~~2017~~2018.

ATEL 12, LLC, will satisfy the disclosure requirements for providing estimated per Unit values pursuant to the Notice as follows:

For these disclosures, subsequent to the Fund's initial compliance with FINRA 15-02, annual disclosures of estimated per Unit values, through the termination of the Fund; will be accomplished and included on an annual basis in a document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission available to the public.

Specifics Underlying Valuation Methodology:

Notes and Explanation of Valuation Components and Calculation

Fund Assets and Liabilities (other than as specifically identified below): The estimated values for non-interest bearing items such as current assets and liabilities are assumed to equal their reported GAAP balances as an appropriate approximation of their fair values. Debt (interest bearing) is assumed to equal the fair values of the debt as disclosed in the footnotes of the financial statements.

Investments in Leases (net of fees and expenses): The estimated values for Investments in Leases are based on calculating the present value of the projected future cash flows. Projected future cash flows include both the remaining contractual lease payments, plus assumptions on lease renewals and sale value of the residuals. Projected future cash flows are net of projected future fees and expenses including:

•

management fees applicable for the Fund (4.00% of revenue)

•

carried interest applicable for the Fund (7.50% of distributions)

•

operating expenses which are assumed to be 3% of original equipment costs for the Fund

Projected future cash flows have been discounted back to present value at discount rates based on like-term U.S. Treasury yields (as of the valuation date) plus a 400 basis point spread, to account for the credit risk differentials between the instrument being valued and U.S. Treasury security yields.

Residual values assumptions used in the cash flow projections are as follows:

For On-Lease and Month-to-Month Lease: Considers realized residual as a percent of book residual of ~~165.9~~166%, based on ATEL’s historical track record as of December 31, ~~2017~~2018.

For Off-Lease: A fair value of off-lease equipment is based on estimates from ATEL’s seasoned Asset Management Group.

Special Situation Leases: The valuation of certain leases has been performed outside of the above noted protocol based upon specific lease assumptions different than the macro assumptions above, due to the specific situations of those leases.

C. Investments in Notes Receivable: The estimated values for Investments in Notes Receivable are assumed to approximate the reported GAAP balances.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

D.Special ~~Investments~~Situation ~~in Securities~~Leases: The ~~estimated~~valuation ~~values~~of ~~for~~certain ~~Investments~~leases inhas ~~Securities have~~ been ~~based~~performed onoutside ~~the estimated net book value as~~ of the ~~valuation~~above ~~date~~noted ~~(with~~protocol ~~impairment adjustments), plus any unrealized gain on equity. The unrealized gain on equity is~~ based onupon ~~either:~~specific a)lease ~~the~~assumptions ~~most~~different ~~recent~~than ~~round of financing, b)~~ the ~~most~~macro ~~recent~~assumptions ~~409A valuation provided by the underlying companies of the warrants~~above, ordue c)to the ~~Manager’s~~specific ~~estimate~~situations of ~~the~~those ~~company valuations based on all available information, including company financials, company valuation reports, public press releases, and other sources~~leases.

EC. ~~Warrants~~Investments ~~Outstanding~~in Securities: The estimated values for ~~Warrants~~Investments ~~Outstanding~~in ~~considers~~Securities have been based on the ~~reported~~estimated ~~GAAP~~net ~~balances~~book tovalue beas anof ~~appropriate~~the ~~approximation~~valuation date (with impairment adjustments), plus any unrealized gain on equity. The unrealized gain on equity is based on either: a) the most recent round of ~~their~~financing, ~~fair~~b) ~~values~~the most recent 409A valuation provided by the underlying companies of the warrants, or c) the Manager’s estimate of the company valuations based on all available information, including company financials, company valuation reports, public press releases, and other sources.

FD. ~~Syndication~~Warrants ~~Costs~~Outstanding: ~~Syndication~~The ~~costs~~estimated values for ~~the~~Warrants ~~Fund~~Outstanding ~~have~~considers ~~been added to~~ the ~~value,~~reported ~~estimated~~GAAP ~~based~~balances ~~on 15% of gross equity raised, and are assumed~~ to be ~~amortized~~an ~~over~~appropriate ~~the~~approximation ~~expected 12-year life~~ of ~~the~~their ~~Fund.~~fair ~~The remaining unamortized portion has been added to the Fund’s balance sheet as an asset~~values.

GE. ~~Accrued~~Syndication ~~distributions~~Costs: ~~Accrued~~Syndication ~~distributions,~~costs ~~which~~for ~~are~~the ~~payable~~Fund have been added to the ~~Unit~~value, ~~holders~~estimated ~~have~~based ~~been~~on ~~removed~~15% ~~from~~of gross equity raised, and are assumed to be amortized over the ~~balance~~expected ~~sheet~~12-year ~~liability~~life ~~section~~of ~~because~~the ~~they~~Fund. ~~are~~The ~~not~~remaining aunamortized ~~liability~~portion has been added to athe ~~third~~Fund’s ~~party~~balance sheet as an asset.

Accrued distributions: Accrued distributions, which are payable to the Unit holders have been removed from the balance sheet liability section because they are not a liability to a third party.

ATEL 12, LLC Unit Valuation

The Manager’s estimated per Unit value of ATEL 12, LLC at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 as determined, and derived under the guidelines of the Appraised Value Methodology, and pursuant to the above specific enumerated component valuation methodologies and calculations, equals $1.6336. An independent national public accounting firm with valuation expertise was retained to examine, attest and confirm ATEL 12, LLC’s per Unit valuation and its component methodologies and calculation as it relates to compliance with the regulatory mandate defined in the Notice. In this regard, they examined the components of the valuation methodologies and determined them to be reasonable and within industry standards. Other component attributes, including the bases and related key assumptions of the calculation were tested for their completeness, underlying documentation support and mathematical accuracy. Upon completion of their efforts, their attestation report confirmed that the per unit valuation of ATEL 12, LLC, and the related notes, in all material respects, was based upon industry practice as described in the Manager’s valuation approach.

Disclaimer

The foregoing Fund per Unit valuation has been performed solely for the purpose of providing an estimated value per Unit in accordance with a regulatory mandate, in order to provide the broker dealer and custodian community with a valuation on a reasonable and attested basis for use in assigning an estimation of a Unit holder’s account value. Any report or disclosure of such estimated per Unit valuation is to be accompanied by statements that the value does not represent an estimate of the amount a Unit holder would receive if the Unit holder were to seek to sell the Units, and that the Fund intends to liquidate its assets in the ordinary course of its business and over the Fund’s term. Further, each statement of the Fund’s estimated per Unit valuation is to be accompanied by a disclosure that there can be no assurance as to (1) when the Fund will be fully liquidated, (2) the amount the Fund may actually receive if and when the Fund seeks to liquidate its assets, (3) the amount of lease or loan payments the Fund will actually receive over the remaining term, (4) the amount of asset disposition proceeds the Fund will actually receive over the remaining term, and (5) the amounts that may actually be received in distributions by Unit holders over the course of the remaining term.

Distributions

The Unitholders of record are entitled to certain distributions as provided under the Operating Agreement. The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of February 2008. Additional distributions have been consistently made through ~~December~~July 31, 2017. There was no distribution in 2018.

Cash distributions were paid by the Fund to Unitholders of record as of November 30, 2017, and paid through December 31, 2017. Distributions may be characterized for tax, accounting and economic purposes as a return of capital, a return on capital (including escrow interest) or a portion of each. Generally, the portion of each cash distribution by a company which exceeds its net income for the fiscal period would constitute a return of capital. The Fund is required by the terms of its Operating Agreement to distribute the net cash flow generated by its investments in certain minimum amounts during the Reinvestment Period before it can reinvest its operating cash flow in additional portfolio assets. See the discussion in the ATEL 12, LLC Prospectus dated September 26, 2007 (“Prospectus”) under “Income, Losses and Distributions — Reinvestment.” Accordingly, the amount of cash flow from Fund investments distributed to Unitholders will not be available for reinvestment in additional portfolio assets.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

portfolio assets. See the discussion in the ATEL 12, LLC Prospectus dated September 26, 2007 (“Prospectus”) under “Income, Losses and Distributions — Reinvestment.” Accordingly, the amount of cash flow from Fund investments distributed to Unitholders will not be available for reinvestment in additional portfolio assets.

Cash distributions were based on current and anticipated gross revenues from the leases and loans acquired. During the Fund’s acquisition and operating stages, the Fund may incur short term borrowing to fund regular distributions of such gross revenues to be generated by newly acquired transactions during their respective initial fixed terms. As such, all Fund periodic cash distributions made during these stages have been, and are expected in the future to be, based on the Fund’s actual and anticipated gross revenues to be generated from the binding initial terms of the leases and loans acquired.

The following table presents summarized information regarding distributions to other members:

	2017			~~2016~~
Net (loss) income per Unit, based on weighted average Units outstanding	$	(0.02	)	$	0.12
Net income (loss) per Unit, based on weighted average Units outstanding	$	(0.09	)
Return of investment		0.29			~~0.78~~
Distributions declared per Unit, based on weighted average Other Member Units outstanding		0.2720			~~0.90~~
Differences due to timing of distributions		—			—
Actual distributions paid per Unit	$	0.20
Actual distributions paid per Unit	$	0.27		$	0.90

Item 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

A smaller reporting company is not required to present selected financial data in accordance with item 301(c) of Regulation S-K.

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements contained in this Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in investment and reinvestment, delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During 2009, the Company completed its initial acquisition stage with the investment of the net proceeds from the public offering of Units. Subsequently, during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), the Company has reinvested cash flow in excess of certain amounts required to be distributed to the members and/or utilized its credit facilities to acquire additional equipment. Throughout the Reinvestment Period, which ended December 31, 2015, the Company reinvested cash flow in excess of minimum distributions and other obligations. The Company is governed by its Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (“Operating Agreement”), as amended.

The Company may continue until December 31, 2030. However, pursuant to the guidelines of the Operating Agreement, the Company commenced liquidation phase activities on January 1, 2016. Periodic distributions are paid at the discretion of the Managing Member.

Results of Operations

It is the Company’s objective to maintain a 100% utilization rate for all equipment purchased in any given year. All equipment transactions are acquired subject to binding lease commitments, so equipment utilization is expected to remain high during the funding period and throughout the reinvestment stage. Initial lease terms of these leases are generally from 36 to 120 months, and as they expire, the Company will attempt to re-lease or sell the equipment. All of the Company’s equipment on lease was purchased in the years 2008 through 2013. The utilization percentage of existing assets under lease was both 99% ~~and 98%~~ at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016, respectively~~2017.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member and/or affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred.

20172018 versus 20162017

The Company had net ~~loss~~income of $~~192~~889 thousand and net ~~income~~loss of $~~583~~192 thousand for the years ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, respectively. ~~The~~Results ~~net results~~ for ~~2017~~2018 reflect aan ~~decrease~~increase in total ~~revenue~~revenues and ana ~~increase~~decrease in total operating expenses when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for ~~2017~~2018 ~~declined~~increased by $~~181~~57 thousand, or 114%, as compared to the prior year period. Such ~~decrease~~increase was largely due to a $~~349~~153 thousand, or ~~21%~~7 times, ~~reduction~~increase in ~~operating~~gain ~~lease~~on ~~revenues,~~sales ~~mainly the result~~ of ~~dispositions of~~ lease assets~~; a $114 thousand~~, ormainly ~~90%,~~the ~~decrease~~result inof ~~other~~the ~~revenue~~change ~~related to deferred maintenance fees previously collected on certain returned equipment~~ in the ~~prior~~volume ~~period;~~ and amix ~~$15~~of ~~thousand~~assets ~~decrease~~sold; ~~in interest on notes receivable,~~ offset, in part, by a $~~158~~64 thousand, or 9485%, ~~favorable~~decrease ~~change~~due to gain on ~~the~~sales ~~fair~~or ~~value~~dispositions ~~adjustment~~of ~~for~~investment ~~warrants~~in securities; a $~~128~~65 thousand, or ~~121~~5% decrease, ~~favorable~~in ~~change~~operating ~~on the gain on sales of~~ lease ~~assets~~revenue, ~~and~~the ~~early~~result ~~termination~~ of ~~notes~~portfolio ~~receivable;~~runoff and adisposition ~~$13 thousand, or 21%, increase in gain on sales~~ of ~~investment~~lease ~~in securities~~assets.

Expenses

Total expenses for ~~2017~~2018 ~~increased~~decreased by $~~594~~1 ~~thousand~~million, or 5863%, as compared to the prior year period. ~~Such~~The ~~increase~~decrease in total expenses was primarily the result of a $~~281~~341 thousand, ~~increase~~or 60%, decrease in ~~impairment~~depreciation ~~losses~~of ~~recognized~~operating onlease ~~equipment;~~assets, a ~~$219~~result ~~thousand~~of ~~increase~~lease inportfolio ~~impairment~~runoff ~~losses~~and ondisposition ~~investment~~of inlease ~~securities during the current year period~~assets; a $37281 thousand, or 88100%, ~~increase~~decrease inrelated ~~outside~~to ~~services,~~certain ~~indicative~~impairment oflosses ~~additional~~on ~~efforts~~equipment ~~required~~only torecognized ~~comply~~in ~~with~~and ~~certain~~attributable ~~regulatory~~to ~~requirements~~the prior year period; a $32219 thousand, ~~increase~~or 100%, decrease in animpairment ~~adjustment~~losses ~~for~~on ~~provision~~investment ~~for~~in ~~credit~~securities ~~losses,~~that ~~due~~were toalso ~~increased~~recorded ~~delinquent~~during ~~accounts~~the prior year period; a $2070 thousand, or ~~16%~~two times, ~~increase~~decrease in ~~professional~~provision ~~fees~~for ~~related~~credit tolosses, a ~~year~~result ~~over~~of ~~year~~customers’ ~~difference~~payments inon ~~timing~~their ~~and~~account ~~related billings for professional audit and tax services~~balances; ana $1847 thousand, or 328%, ~~increase~~decrease in ~~depreciation~~cost ~~expense,~~reimbursements ~~mainly~~to ~~the~~Managing ~~result~~Member ofand affiliates, a ~~lease~~result ~~contract~~of ~~renewal and~~ a ~~reduction~~net incost ~~residual~~allocation ~~value on certain equipment~~adjustment; ~~offset~~and ina ~~part, by an~~ $1144 thousand, or 2330%, decrease in ~~asset~~professional ~~management~~ fees related to ~~the~~a ~~managing~~year ~~member,~~over year difference in timing and related tobillings ~~lower~~for ~~revenue~~professional ~~from~~audit ~~leases~~and tax services.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

At December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $~~479~~1.5 ~~thousand~~million and $~~1.0~~479 ~~million~~thousand, respectively. The liquidity of the Company varies, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as lease assets are acquired, as distributions are made to the Members and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Company currently believes it has adequate reserves available to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Company would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. The Managing Member envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth summary cash flow data (in thousands):

	2017			2016
	2018			2017
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	~~812~~810		$	~~1,424~~812
Investing activities		~~230~~338			~~635~~230
Financing activities		(~~1,596~~103	)		(31,~~366~~596	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(554	)	$	(1,307	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	1,045		$	(554	)

20172018 versus 20162017

During ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, the Company’s primary sources of liquidity were cash flows from its portfolio of operating ~~and direct financing~~ lease contracts~~, and its investments in notes receivable~~. InThe ~~addition, the~~ Company ~~realized~~received $~~229~~10 thousand and $~~319~~99 thousand of proceeds from the sales or dispositions of investment in securities ~~and~~during ~~sales~~2018 ~~of lease assets~~ and~~/or~~ ~~the early termination of notes receivable~~2017, ~~in 2017 and 2016~~ respectively. ~~Principal~~Proceeds ~~payments~~from ~~received~~sales onof ~~notes~~lease ~~receivable~~assets were $0328 thousand and $~~309~~130 thousand for the years ended ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, respectively.

~~During~~Cash ~~the same comparative years, cash~~ was ~~primarily~~ used to pay distributions ~~and repay debt. Distributions paid~~ to ~~both~~the ~~other~~Other ~~members~~Members and ~~the~~ Managing Member, ~~totaled~~totaling $1.1 million ~~and~~in $22017.9 ~~million~~There ~~for~~was ~~2017~~no ~~and~~distribution ~~2016,~~paid ~~respectively;~~in ~~while cash used to repay non-recourse debt totaled $463 thousand and $455 thousand, respectively~~2018.

Cash was used to pay down non-recourse debt totaling $103 thousand and $463 thousand during 2018 and 2017, respectively.

In addition, cash was used to pay invoices related to management fees and expenses, and other payables.

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

As of December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, the Company had non-recourse long-term debt totaling $~~103~~0 thousand and $~~566~~103 thousand, respectively. Such non-recourse notes payable do not contain any material financial covenants. The notes ~~are~~were secured by a specific lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders ~~have~~had recourse only to the following collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items.

For detailed information on the Company’s debt obligations, see Note 7 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Distributions

The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of February 2008. Additional distributions have been consistently made through December 31, ~~2017~~2018. See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities, for additional information regarding the distributions.

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, ~~2017~~2018, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets and fund investments in notes receivable.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements attached hereto at pages 11 through 30.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Members
ATEL 12, LLC

WeOpinion haveon audited the accompanyingFinancial balance sheets of ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related statements of operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Statements

~~Basis~~We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related statements of operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for ~~Opinion~~the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

TheseBasis financialfor statements are the responsibility of the Management of the Company’s Managing Member. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.Opinion

WeThese ~~conducted~~financial ~~our~~statements ~~audits~~are inthe ~~accordance~~responsibility ~~with~~of the ~~standards~~Management of the ~~PCAOB.~~Company’s ~~Those~~Managing ~~standards~~Member. ~~require~~Our ~~that~~responsibility weis ~~plan and perform the audits~~ to ~~obtain~~express ~~reasonable~~an ~~assurance~~opinion ~~about~~on ~~whether~~ the Company’s financial statements ~~are~~based ~~free~~on ofour ~~material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud~~audits. ~~The~~We ~~Company~~are isa ~~not~~public ~~required~~accounting tofirm ~~have,~~registered ~~nor~~with ~~were~~the wePublic ~~engaged~~Company toAccounting ~~perform,~~Oversight anBoard ~~audit~~(United ofStates) ~~its~~(“PCAOB”) ~~internal~~and ~~control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we~~ are required to ~~obtain~~be anindependent ~~understanding~~with ofrespect ~~internal~~to ~~control~~the ~~over~~Company ~~financial~~in ~~reporting~~accordance ~~but~~with ~~not~~the ~~for~~U.S. ~~the~~federal ~~purpose~~securities oflaws ~~expressing~~and anthe ~~opinion~~applicable onrules ~~the~~and ~~effectiveness~~regulations of the ~~Company’s~~Securities ~~internal~~and ~~control~~Exchange ~~over~~Commission ~~financial reporting.~~and ~~Accordingly,~~the ~~we express no such opinion~~PCAOB.

~~Our~~We ~~audits~~conducted ~~included~~our ~~performing~~audits ~~procedures~~in toaccordance ~~assess~~with the ~~risks~~standards of ~~material~~the ~~misstatement~~PCAOB. ofThose standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud,. ~~and~~The ~~performing~~Company ~~procedures~~is tonot ~~respond~~required to ~~those~~have, ~~risks.~~nor ~~Such~~were ~~procedures~~we ~~included~~engaged ~~examining~~to perform, onan aaudit ~~test~~of ~~basis,~~its ~~evidence~~internal ~~regarding~~control ~~the~~over ~~amounts~~financial ~~and~~reporting. ~~disclosures~~As inpart ~~the~~of ~~financial~~our ~~statements.~~audits ~~Our~~we ~~audits~~are ~~also~~required ~~included~~to ~~evaluating~~obtain ~~the~~an ~~accounting~~understanding ~~principles~~of ~~used~~internal ~~and~~control ~~significant~~over ~~estimates~~financial ~~made~~reporting bybut ~~management,~~not asfor ~~well~~the aspurpose ~~evaluating~~of ~~the~~expressing ~~overall~~an ~~presentation~~opinion ofon the ~~financial~~effectiveness ~~statements.~~of Wethe ~~believe~~Company’s ~~that~~internal ~~our~~control ~~audits~~over ~~provide~~financial reporting. aAccordingly, ~~reasonable~~we ~~basis~~express ~~for~~no ~~our~~such opinion.

~~/s/~~Our ~~Moss~~audits ~~Adams~~included ~~LLP~~performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~San~~/s/ ~~Francisco,~~Moss ~~CaliforniaMarch~~Adams ~~26, 2018~~LLP

WeSan ~~have~~Francisco, ~~served~~CaliforniaMarch as15, ~~the Company’s auditor since 2007.~~ 2019

11We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~11

~~ATEL~~TABLE ~~12,~~OF ~~LLC BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND DECEMBER 31, 2016 (In Thousands)~~CONTENTS

	2017		2016
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	479	$	1,033
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $37 at December 31, 2017 and $4 at December 31, 2016		42		78
Investment in securities		27		272
Warrants, fair value		149		159
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $8,417 at December 31, 2017 and $8,230 at December 31, 2016		1,924		2,885
Due from Managing Member		10		—
Prepaid expenses and other assets		25		26
Total assets	$	2,656	$	4,453
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Managing Member	$	—	$	70
Affiliates		36		—
Accrued distributions to Other Members		—		230
Other		257		266
Non-recourse debt		103		566
Unearned operating lease income		37		22
Total liabilities		433		1,154
Commitments and contingencies
Members’ capital:
Managing Member		—		—
Other Members		2,223		3,299
Total Members’ capital		2,223		3,299
Total liabilities and Members’ capital	$	2,656	$	4,453

ATEL 12, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Thousands)

See accompanying notes.


	2018		2017
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,524	$	479
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 at December 31, 2018, and $37 at December 31, 2017		10		42
Due from Managing Member		46		10
Investment in securities		33		27
Warrants, fair value		153		149
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $6,692 at December 31, 2018 and $8,417 at December 31, 2017		1,542		1,924
Prepaid expenses and other assets		27		25
Total assets	$	3,335	$	2,656
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Affiliates	$	—	$	36
Other		206		257
Non-recourse debt		—		103
Unearned operating lease income		17		37
Total liabilities		223		433
Commitments and contingencies
Members’ capital:
Other Members		3,112		2,223
Total Members’ capital		3,112		2,223
Total liabilities and Members’ capital	$	3,335	$	2,656

12See accompanying notes.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~12

~~ATEL~~TABLE ~~12, LLC STATEMENTS~~ OF ~~OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)~~CONTENTS

	2017			2016
Revenues:
Leasing and lending activities:
Operating leases	$	1,328		$	1,677
Direct financing leases		—			2
Interest on notes receivable		—			15
Gain (loss) on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		22			(106	)
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		75			62
Unrealized loss on fair value adjustment for warrants		(10	)		(168	)
Other		13			127
Total revenues		1,428			1,609
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		570			552
Asset management fees to Managing Member		37			48
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates		169			160
Provision for credit losses		33			1
Impairment losses on equipment		281			—
Impairment losses on investment in securities		219			—
Amortization of initial direct costs		1			1
Interest expense		7			17
Professional fees		145			125
Outside services		79			42
Taxes on income and franchise fees		38			27
Printing and photocopying		16			15
Other		25			38
Total expenses		1,620			1,026
Net (loss) income	$	(192	)	$	583
Net income (loss):
Managing Member	$	66		$	218
Other Members		(258	)		365
	$	(192	)	$	583
Net (loss) income per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.12
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482			2,992,482

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

See accompanying notes.


	2018			2017
Revenues:
Leasing activities:
Operating leases	$	1,263		$	1,328
Gain on sales of lease assets		175			22
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		11			75
Unrealized gain on fair value adjustment for investment in securities		5			—
Unrealized gain (loss) on fair value adjustment for warrants		4			(10	)
Other		27			13
Total revenues		1,485			1,428
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		229			570
Asset management fees to Managing Member		50			37
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates		122			169
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses		(37	)		33
Impairment losses on equipment		—			281
Impairment losses on investment in securities		—			219
Amortization of initial direct costs		—			1
Interest expense		—			7
Professional fees		101			145
Outside services		88			79
Taxes on income and franchise fees		18			38
Printing and photocopying		11			16
Other		14			25
Total expenses		596			1,620
Net income (loss)	$	889		$	(192	)
Net income (loss):
Managing Member	$	—		$	66
Other Members		889			(258	)
		889			(192	)
Net income (loss) per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	$	0.30		$	(0.09	)
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482			2,992,482

13See accompanying notes.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~13

~~ATEL~~TABLE ~~12, LLC STATEMENTS~~ OF ~~CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 (In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)~~CONTENTS

			Amount
	Units		Other Members			Managing Member			Total
Balance December 31, 2015		2,992,482	$	5,627		$	—		$	5,627
Distributions to Other Members ($0.90 per Unit)		—		(2,693	)		—			(2,693	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—		—			(218	)		(218	)
Net income		—		365			218			583
Balance December 31, 2016		2,992,482		3,299			—			3,299
Distributions to Other Members ($0.27 per Unit)		—		(818	)		—			(818	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—		—			(66	)		(66	)
Net (loss) income		—		(258	)		66			(192	)
Balance December 31, 2017		2,992,482	$	2,223		$	—		$	2,223

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

See accompanying notes.


			Amount
	Units		Other Members			Managing Member			Total
Balance December 31, 2016		2,992,482	$	3,299		$	—		$	3,299
Distributions to Other Members ($0.27 per Unit)		—		(818	)		—			(818	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—		—			(66	)		(66	)
Net ( loss ) income		—		(258	)		66			(192	)
Balance December 31, 2017		2,992,482		2,223			—			2,223
Net income		—		889			—			889
Balance December 31, 2018		2,992,482	$	3,112		$	—		$	3,112

14See accompanying notes.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~14

~~ATEL~~TABLE ~~12, LLC STATEMENTS~~ OF ~~CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016(In Thousands)~~CONTENTS

	2017			2016
Operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(192	)	$	583
Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:
(Gain) loss on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		(22	)		106
Depreciation of operating lease assets		570			552
Amortization of initial direct costs		1			1
Provision for credit losses		33			1
Provision for losses on investment in securities		219			—
Impairment losses on equipment		281			—
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		(75	)		(62	)
Unrealized loss on fair value adjustment for warrants		10			168
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		3			(38	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1			—
Accounts payable, Managing Member		(61	)		49
Accounts payable, other		(7	)		82
Accrued liabilities, affiliates		36			—
Unearned operating lease income		15			(18	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		812			1,424
Investing activities:
Purchase of investment in securities		—			(9	)
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		130			220
Proceeds from sales or dispositions of investment in securities		99			99
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		1			16
Principal payments received on notes receivable		—			309
Net cash provided by investing activities		230			635
Financing activities:
Repayments under non-recourse debt		(463	)		(455	)
Distributions to Other Members		(1,048	)		(2,693	)
Distributions to Managing Member		(85	)		(218	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,596	)		(3,366	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(554	)		(1,307	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		1,033			2,340
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	479		$	1,033
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	7		$	17
Cash paid during the year for taxes	$	29		$	35
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Distributions payable to Other Members at year-end	$	—		$	230
Distributions payable to Managing Member at year-end	$	—		$	19

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
(In Thousands)

See accompanying notes.


	2018			2017
Operating activities:
Net income ( loss )	$	889		$	(192	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of lease assets		(175	)		(22	)
Depreciation of operating lease assets		229			570
Amortization of initial direct costs		—			1
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses		(37	)		33
Provision for losses on investment in securities		—			219
Impairment losses on equipment		—			281
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		(11	)		(75	)
Unrealized gain on fair value adjustment for investment in securities		(5	)		—
Unrealized (gain) loss on fair value adjustment for warrants		(4	)		10
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		69			3
Due from Managing Member and affiliates		(36	)		—
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(2	)		1
Accounts payable, Managing Member and affiliates		(36	)		(25	)
Accounts payable, other		(51	)		(7	)
Unearned operating lease income		(20	)		15
Net cash provided by operating activities		810			812
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of lease assets		328			130
Proceeds from sales or dispositions of investment in securities		10			99
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		—			1
Net cash provided by investing activities		338			230
Financing activities:
Repayments under non-recourse debt		(103	)		(463	)
Distributions to Other Members		—			(1,048	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—			(85	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(103	)		(1,596	)
Net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents		1,045			(554	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		479			1,033
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	1,524		$	479
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	—		$	7
Cash paid during the year for taxes	$	19		$	29

15See accompanying notes.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on January 25, 2007 (“Date of Inception”) for the purpose of equipment financing and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. From its inception into the third quarter of 2013, the Managing Member was ATEL Associates 12, (“AA12”), a Nevada limited liability company. Effective September 30, 2013, AA12 was merged into ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS” or “Managing Member” or “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group. The Fund may continue until December 31, 2030. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member.

The Company’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unitholders, with any balance remaining after required minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional investments during the Reinvestment Period (ending six calendar years after the completion of the Company’s public offering of Units) and (iii) provide additional cash distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all investment portfolio assets has been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by the ATEL 12, LLC amended and restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement dated April 3, 2007 (the “Operating Agreement”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, the Managing Member and/or its affiliates receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 6, Related party transactions). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of the Managing Member.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, and the related statements of operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain prior year amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results from operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after December 31, ~~2017~~2018, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require additional disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements, and adjustments thereto.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasury instruments with original and/or purchased maturities of ninety days or less.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and for determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for credit losses on notes receivable.

Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company. Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based on historical charge off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Credit risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents, operating and direct financing lease receivables, notes receivable and accounts receivable. The Company places the majority of its cash deposits in noninterest-bearing accounts with financial institutions that have no less than $10 billion in assets. Such deposits are insured up to $250 thousand. The remainder of the Funds’ cash is temporarily invested in U.S. Treasury denominated instruments. The concentration of such deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Company. Accounts and notes receivable represent amounts due from lessees or borrowers in various industries, related to equipment on operating and direct financing leases or notes receivable.

Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. The Company depreciates all lease assets, in accordance with guidelines consistent with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 840-20-35-3, over the periods of the lease terms contained in each asset’s respective lease contract to the estimated residual value at the end of the lease contract. All lease assets were purchased only concurrent with the execution of a lease commitment by the lessee. Thus, the original depreciation period corresponds with the term of the original lease. Once the term of an original lease contract is completed, the subject property is typically sold to the existing user, re-leased to the existing user, or, when off-lease, is held for sale. Assets which are re-leased continue to be depreciated using the terms of the new lease agreements and the estimated residual values at the end of the new lease terms, adjusted downward as necessary. Assets classified as held-for-sale are carried at the lower of carrying amount, or the fair value less cost to sell.

The Company does not use the equipment held in its portfolio, but holds it solely for lease and ultimate sale. In the course of marketing equipment that has come off-lease, management may determine at some point that re-leasing the assets may provide a superior return for investors and would then execute another lease. Upon entering into a new lease contract, management will estimate the residual value once again and resume depreciation. If, and when, the Company, at any time, determines that depreciation in value may have occurred with respect to an asset held-for-sale, the Company would review the value to determine whether a material reduction in value had occurred and recognize

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

any appropriate impairment. All lease assets, including off-lease assets, are subject to the Company’s quarterly impairment analysis, as described below. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.

Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms will vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms to be negotiated, but initial leases are generally on terms from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet.

Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.

Direct financing leases and related revenue recognition:

Income from direct financing lease transactions is reported using the financing method of accounting, in which the Company’s investment in the leased property is reported as a receivable from the lessee to be recovered through future rentals. The interest income portion of each rental payment is calculated so as to generate a constant rate of return on the net receivable outstanding.

Allowances for losses on direct financing leases are typically established based on historical charge-off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified lessees and billed and unbilled receivables. Direct financing leases are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

Direct financing leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) and deemed impaired when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of all direct finance lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related direct financing leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, all payments received are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Notes receivable, unearned interest income and related revenue recognition:

The Company records all future payments of principal and interest on notes as notes receivable, which are then offset by the amount of any related unearned interest income. For financial statement purposes, the Company reports only the net amount of principal due on the balance sheet. The unearned interest is recognized over the term of the note and the income portion of each note payment is calculated so as to generate a constant rate of return on the net balance outstanding. Any fees or costs related to notes receivable are recorded as part of the net investment in notes receivable and amortized over the term of the loan.

Allowances for losses on notes receivable are typically established based on historical charge off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified borrowers and billed and unbilled receivables. Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Notes receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related notes may be placed on non-accrual status. Notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, all payments received are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Initial direct costs:

The Company capitalizes initial direct costs (“IDC”) associated with the origination and funding of lease assets and investments in notes receivable. IDC includes both internal costs (e.g., the costs of employees’ activities in connection with successful lease and loan originations) and external broker fees incurred with such originations. The costs are amortized on a lease by lease (or note by note) basis based on actual lease term using a straight-line method for operating leases and the effective interest rate method for direct financing leases and notes receivable. Upon disposal of the underlying lease assets and notes receivable, both the initial direct costs and the associated accumulated amortization are relieved. Costs related to leases or notes receivable that are not consummated are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs and are expensed as acquisition expense.

Acquisition expense:

Acquisition expense represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses and miscellaneous expenses related to the selection and acquisition of equipment which are reimbursable to the Managing Member under the terms of the Operating Agreement. As the costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred.

Asset valuation:

Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than the net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances.

~~Segment reporting:~~18

~~The~~TABLE ~~Company~~OF is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States. CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

leasingSegment transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment lease financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas. reporting:

The ~~primary geographic region in which the~~ Company ~~seeks leasing opportunities~~ is ~~North~~organized ~~America.~~into Asone ofoperating ~~and~~segment for the ~~years~~purpose ~~ended~~of ~~December~~making ~~31,~~operating ~~2017~~decisions ~~and~~or ~~2016,~~assessing ~~all~~performance. ofAccordingly, the Company’s ~~current~~operates ~~operating~~in ~~revenues~~one ~~and~~reportable ~~long-lived~~operating ~~assets~~segment ~~relate to customers domiciled~~ in the United States.

The Company’s principal decision makers are the Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Company believes that its equipment leasing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Company measures profit and loss at the equipment portfolio level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment leasing transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment lease financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas.

The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks leasing opportunities is North America. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, all of the Company’s current operating revenues and long-lived assets relate to customers domiciled in the United States.

Investment in securities:

From time to time, the Company may purchase securities of its borrowers or receive warrants to purchase securities in connection with its lending arrangements.

Purchased securities

~~Purchased~~The ~~securities~~Company’s ~~are~~investment ~~generally~~securities ~~not~~ registered for public sale ~~and~~ are carried at ~~cost.~~fair ~~Such~~value ~~securities~~with ~~are~~any ~~adjusted~~changes toin fair value ifrecognized in the ~~fair~~Company’s ~~value~~results isof ~~less~~operations. ~~than~~The ~~the~~Company’s ~~carrying~~investment ~~value~~securities ~~and~~that ~~such~~do ~~impairment~~not ishave ~~deemed~~readily bydeterminable ~~the~~fair ~~Managing~~values ~~Member~~are tomeasured beat ~~other~~cost ~~than~~minus ~~temporary~~impairment, and adjusted for changes in observable prices. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. The Company had $2733 thousand and $~~272~~27 thousand of purchased securities at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, respectively. Based upon the Company’s review of its portfolio, the Company recorded fair value adjustments on investment in securities totaling $~~219~~5 thousand and $0 during 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recorded an impairment loss on investment in securities of $0 and ~~2016~~$219 thousand during 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recognized gains of $7511 thousand and $6275 thousand on sales of investment in securities during the years ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, respectively.

Warrants

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are reflected at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet as determined by the Managing Member. The Company recorded unrealized ~~losses~~gain of $104 thousand and unrealized loss of $~~168~~10 thousand on fair value adjustment of its warrants during ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, respectively. The unrealized ~~losses~~gain recorded during ~~2017~~2018 ~~reduced~~increased the estimated fair value of the Company’s portfolio of warrants to $~~149~~153 thousand at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 from $~~159~~149 thousand at December 31, ~~2016~~2017. ~~The~~There ~~Company~~were ~~realized~~no ~~gains of $2 thousand on the net~~ exercise of ~~certain~~ warrants, ~~in 2017.~~net ~~The Company realized no gains~~ or ~~losses~~otherwise, ~~from~~in ~~the net exercise of warrants during 2016~~2018.

Unearned operating lease income:

The Company records prepayments on operating leases as a liability under the caption of unearned operating lease income. The liability is recorded when prepayments are received and recognized as operating lease revenue over the period to which the prepayments relate using a straight-line method.

~~Income Taxes:~~19

~~The~~TABLE ~~Company~~OF is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 701 of the Internal Revenue Code, a partnership is not subject to federal income taxes. Accordingly, the Company has provided current franchise income taxes for only those states which levy income taxes on partnerships. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related provision for state income taxes was approximately $38 thousand and $27 thousand, respectively. The Company does not have any entity level uncertain tax positions. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions and is generally subject to examination by U.S. federal (or state and local) income tax authorities for three years from the filing of a tax return. CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

TheIncome tax bases of the Company’s net assets and liabilities vary from the amounts presented in these financial statements at December 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands)Taxes:

	2017			2016
Financial statement basis of net assets	$	2,223		$	3,299
Tax basis of net assets (unaudited)		5,672			5,854
Difference (unaudited)	$	(3,449	)	$	(2,555	)

The Company is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 701 of the Internal Revenue Code, a partnership is not subject to federal income taxes. Accordingly, the Company has provided current franchise income taxes for only those states which levy income taxes on partnerships. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related provision for state income taxes was approximately $18 thousand and $38 thousand, respectively. The Company does not have any entity level uncertain tax positions. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions and is generally subject to examination by U.S. federal (or state and local) income tax authorities for three years from the filing of a tax return.

The ~~primary differences between the~~ tax bases of the Company’s net assets and liabilities vary from the amounts ~~recorded~~presented in ~~the~~these financial statements ~~are~~at ~~the~~December ~~result~~31, of2018 ~~differences in accounting for syndication costs~~ and ~~differences~~2017 ~~between~~as ~~the~~follows ~~depreciation methods used~~ (in ~~the~~thousands): ~~financial statements and the Company’s tax returns.~~

The following reconciles the net (loss) income reported in these financial statements to the income reported on the Company’s federal tax return (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):


	2018			2017
Financial statement basis of net assets	$	3,112		$	2,223
Tax basis of net assets (unaudited)		6,760			5,672
Difference (unaudited)	$	(3,648	)	$	(3,449	)

	2017			2016
Net (loss) income per financial statements	$	(192	)	$	583
Tax adjustments (unaudited):
Adjustment to depreciation expense		466			(6	)
Provision for losses and doubtful accounts		33			1
Adjustments to revenues/other expenses		26			68
Adjustments to gain on sales of assets		105			297
Other		300			(3	)
Income per federal tax return (unaudited)	$	738		$	940

The primary differences between the tax bases of net assets and the amounts recorded in the financial statements are the result of differences in accounting for syndication costs and differences between the depreciation methods used in the financial statements and the Company’s tax returns.

The following reconciles the net income (loss) reported in these financial statements to the income reported on the Company’s federal tax return (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):


	2018			2017
Net income (loss) per financial statements	$	889		$	(192	)
Tax adjustments (unaudited):
Adjustment to depreciation expense		221			466
Provision for losses and doubtful accounts		(37	)		33
Adjustments to revenues/other expenses		(23	)		26
Adjustments to gain on sales of assets		38			105
Other		—			300
Income per federal tax return (unaudited)	$	1,088		$	738

Per Unit data:

Net income and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding during the year.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In ~~August~~November ~~2016~~2018, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“~~FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ~~2016~~2018-~~15 — Statement~~19, ofCodification ~~Cash~~Improvements ~~Flows~~to (Topic ~~230~~326, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (“ASU 2018-19”):. ~~Classification~~The new standard clarifies certain aspects of ~~Certain~~the ~~Cash~~new ~~Receipts~~current ~~and~~expected ~~Cash~~credit ~~Payments~~losses (“CECL) impairment model in ASU 2016-~~15”)~~13. ~~ASU~~The ~~2016-15~~amendment ~~addresses~~clarifies ~~specific~~that ~~cash~~receivables ~~flow~~arising ~~issues~~from ~~with~~operating leases are within the ~~objective~~scope of ~~reducing~~ASC ~~the~~842, ~~existing~~rather ~~diversity~~than inASC ~~practice~~326. The ~~amendments~~effective date and transition requirements in this Update are the same as the effective dates and transition requirements in Update 2016-13, as amended by this Update, which is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017~~2019, ~~and~~including interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~This~~Management ~~guidance~~ is ~~effective~~currently ~~for~~evaluating the ~~Company~~impact ~~beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption~~ of ~~ASU~~the ~~2016-15~~standard ~~did not have a material impact~~ on ~~its~~the financial statements and ~~disclosures~~related disclosure requirements.

In ~~June~~August ~~2016~~2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ~~2016~~2018-13, ~~Financial~~Fair ~~Instruments — Credit~~Value ~~Losses~~Measurement (~~Topic 326) (~~“ASU ~~2016~~2018-13”)., ~~The~~which ~~main~~amends ~~objective of this Update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about~~ the ~~expected~~disclosure ~~credit~~requirements ~~losses~~ on ~~financial~~fair ~~instruments~~value ~~and~~measurements ~~other~~in ~~commitments~~Topic to820, ~~extend~~Fair ~~credit~~Value ~~held~~Measurement. byThis aASU ~~reporting~~modifies ~~entity~~disclosure atrequirements ~~each~~for ~~reporting~~fair ~~date.~~value Tomeasurements ~~achieve~~by ~~this objective~~removing, ~~the~~modifying ~~amendments~~or inadding ~~this~~certain Update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimatesdisclosures. The amendments ~~affect entities holding financial assets and net investment~~ in ~~leases~~this ~~that~~Update are ~~not~~effective ~~accounted~~ for atall ~~fair~~entities value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years ~~beginning after December 15~~, ~~2019,~~and ~~including~~ interim periods within those fiscal years., ~~Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2018~~2019. ~~Management~~The isamendments ~~currently~~on ~~evaluating~~changes ~~the standard and expects the Update may potentially result~~ in anunrealized ~~increase~~gains inand ~~the allowance for credit~~ losses, ~~given~~ the ~~change to estimated losses over the contractual life adjusted for expected prepayments.~~

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard will require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases with lease 20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

~~terms~~range ~~greater~~and ~~than~~weighted 12average ~~months in the statement~~ of ~~financial~~significant ~~position.~~unobservable ~~Lessor~~inputs ~~accounting~~used ~~per~~to ~~ASU~~develop ~~2016-02~~Level is3 ~~mostly~~fair ~~unchanged~~value ~~from~~measurements, ~~the~~and ~~previous lease accounting under GAAP. Certain changes were made to~~ the ~~lessor~~narrative ~~accounting~~description ~~guidance~~of inmeasurement ~~order~~uncertainty toshould ~~align~~be ~~the~~applied ~~lessor~~prospectively ~~accounting~~for ~~with~~only the ~~lessee~~most ~~accounting~~recent ~~model~~interim ~~and~~or ~~Topic~~annual ~~606,~~period ~~Revenue~~presented ~~from~~in ~~Contracts with Customers. Similar to~~ the ~~previous~~initial ~~guidance,~~fiscal ~~lessors~~year ~~will~~of ~~classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type~~adoption. ~~Lessors~~All inother ~~operating~~amendments ~~leases~~should ~~will~~be ~~continue~~applied retrospectively to ~~recognize~~all ~~the~~periods ~~underlying~~presented ~~asset~~upon ~~and~~their ~~recognize~~effective ~~income on a straight-line basis~~date. ~~Lessors~~Early ~~determine~~adoption ~~whether a lease~~ is apermitted ~~sale of~~upon ~~the~~issuance ~~underlying asset based on whether the lessee effectively obtains control~~ of ~~the~~this ~~underlying assets~~Update. ~~ASU~~An ~~2016-02~~entity is ~~effective~~permitted ~~for~~to ~~fiscal~~early ~~years~~adopt ~~beginning~~any ~~after~~removed ~~December~~or ~~15,~~modified ~~2018,~~disclosures ~~including~~upon ~~interim~~issuance ~~periods~~of ~~within~~this ~~those~~Update ~~fiscal~~and ~~years.~~delay ~~While early~~ adoption isof ~~permitted,~~ the ~~Company~~additional ~~does~~disclosures ~~not~~until ~~expect~~their effective ~~to elect that option~~date. ~~The~~Management ~~Company~~is ~~expects~~currently toevaluating ~~adopt~~ the ~~guidance~~impact inof ~~the~~this ~~first~~standard ~~quarter~~on ~~2019~~the ~~using~~financial ~~the~~statements ~~modified~~and ~~retrospective~~related ~~method~~disclosure requirements.

~~Management~~In isAugust ~~currently~~2016, ~~evaluating~~ the ~~impact~~FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-15 — Statement of ~~this~~Cash ~~standard~~Flows on(Topic ~~the~~230): ~~financial~~Classification ~~statements~~of ~~and~~Certain ~~its~~Cash ~~operational~~Receipts and ~~related~~Cash ~~disclosure~~Payments ~~requirements,~~(“ASU ~~including~~2016-15”). ~~the~~ASU ~~impact~~2016-15 onaddresses specific cash flow issues with the ~~Company’s~~objective ~~current~~of ~~lease~~reducing ~~portfolio~~the ~~from~~existing adiversity ~~lessor~~in ~~perspective~~practice. ~~Given~~The ~~the~~amendments ~~limited~~in ~~changes~~this toUpdate ~~lessor~~are ~~accounting~~effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~Management~~2017, ~~does~~and ~~not~~interim ~~expect~~periods ~~material~~within ~~changes~~those tofiscal ~~recognition~~years. orThis ~~measurement,~~guidance ~~but~~is effective for the Company isbeginning ~~early~~on inJanuary ~~the~~1, ~~implementation~~2018. ~~process~~The ~~and~~adoption ~~will~~of ~~continue~~ASU to2016-15 ~~evaluate~~did ~~the~~not have a material impact on its financial statements and disclosures.

In ~~January~~June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-0113, Financial Instruments — ~~Overall~~ Credit Losses (~~Subtopic~~Topic ~~825-10~~326): ~~Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~ (“ASU 2016-0113”). The ~~new~~main ~~standard~~objective ~~provides~~of ~~guidance~~this ~~related~~Update is to ~~accounting~~provide ~~for equity investments and~~ financial ~~liabilities~~statement ~~under~~users ~~the~~with ~~fair~~more ~~value~~decision-useful ~~option,~~information ~~and~~about the ~~presentation~~expected ~~and~~credit ~~disclosure~~losses ~~requirements~~on ~~for~~ financial instruments. ~~ASU~~and ~~2016-01, among~~ other ~~things,~~commitments ~~(i)~~to ~~requires~~extend ~~equity~~credit ~~investments,~~held ~~with~~by ~~certain~~a ~~exceptions,~~reporting toentity ~~be measured~~ at ~~fair~~each ~~value~~reporting ~~with~~date. ~~changes~~To inachieve ~~fair~~this ~~value~~objective, ~~recognized~~the amendments in ~~net~~this ~~income,~~Update ~~(ii) simplifies~~replace the ~~impairment~~incurred ~~assessment~~loss ofimpairment ~~equity~~methodology ~~investments~~in ~~without~~current ~~readily~~GAAP ~~determinable~~with ~~fair values by requiring~~ a ~~qualitative~~methodology ~~assessment~~that toreflects ~~identify~~expected ~~impairment,~~credit ~~(iii)~~losses ~~eliminates~~and ~~the~~requires ~~requirement~~consideration ~~for~~of ~~public~~a ~~business~~broader ~~entities~~range toof reasonable ~~disclose the method(s)~~ and ~~significant~~supportable ~~assumptions~~information ~~used~~ to ~~estimate~~inform ~~the~~credit ~~fair~~loss ~~value~~estimates. ~~that~~The isamendments ~~required~~affect toentities beholding ~~disclosed for~~ financial ~~instruments~~assets ~~measured~~and atnet ~~amortized~~investment ~~cost~~in onleases ~~the~~that ~~balance~~are ~~sheet,~~not ~~(iv)~~accounted ~~requires~~for ~~public~~at ~~business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the~~ fair value ofthrough ~~financial~~net ~~instruments~~income. ~~for~~The ~~disclosure~~amendments ~~purposes~~affect loans, ~~and~~debt ~~(v)~~securities, ~~requires~~trade ~~separate~~receivables, ~~presentation~~net ofinvestments ~~financial~~in ~~assets~~leases, ~~and~~off-balance-sheet ~~financial~~credit ~~liabilities~~exposures, byreinsurance ~~measurement~~receivables, ~~category~~ and ~~form~~any ofother financial ~~asset~~assets onnot excluded from the ~~balance~~scope ~~sheet~~that orhave the ~~accompanying~~contractual ~~notes~~right to ~~the~~receive ~~financial statements~~cash. ASU 2016-0113 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017~~2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~This~~Early ~~guidance~~adoption is ~~effective~~permitted for ~~the~~fiscal ~~Company~~years beginning onafter ~~January~~December 115, 2018. ~~The~~Management ~~adoption~~is ~~of ASU~~currently ~~2016-01~~evaluating ~~did~~the ~~not~~standard ~~have~~and aexpects ~~material~~the ~~impact~~Update onmay ~~its~~potentially ~~financial~~result ~~statements~~in ~~and~~an ~~disclosures~~increase in the allowance for credit losses given the change to estimated losses over the contractual life adjusted for expected prepayments.

In ~~May~~February ~~2014~~2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ~~2014~~2016-0902, ~~Revenue~~Leases ~~from~~(Topic ~~Contracts~~842) ~~with Customers~~ (“ASU ~~2014~~2016-0902”),. ~~which~~The ~~amends~~new ~~the~~standard ~~existing~~will ~~accounting~~require ~~standards~~lessees ~~for~~to ~~revenue~~recognize ~~recognition.~~lease ~~ASU~~assets ~~2014-09~~and islease ~~based~~liabilities onarising ~~principles~~from ~~that~~operating ~~govern~~leases ~~the~~with ~~recognition~~lease ofterms ~~revenue~~greater atthan an12 ~~amount~~months anin ~~entity~~the ~~expects~~statement toof befinancial ~~entitled~~position. ~~when~~Lessor ~~products~~accounting ~~are~~per ~~transferred~~ASU to2016-02 ~~customers.~~is Onmostly ~~July~~unchanged 9,from ~~2015,~~ the ~~FASB~~previous ~~approved~~lease ~~the~~accounting ~~deferral~~under ofGAAP. ~~the~~Certain ~~effective~~changes ~~date~~were ofmade ~~ASU~~to ~~2014-09~~the bylessor ~~one~~accounting ~~year~~guidance ~~and~~ in ~~August~~order ~~2015,~~to ~~issued~~align ~~Revenue~~the ~~from~~lessor ~~Contracts~~accounting with ~~Customers~~the ~~(Topic~~lessee ~~606):~~accounting ~~Deferral~~model ofand ~~the~~Topic ~~Effective~~606, ~~Date~~Revenue ~~(“ASU~~from ~~2015-14”).~~Contracts ~~ASU~~with ~~2015-14~~Customers. isSimilar ~~effective~~to ~~for~~the ~~annual~~previous guidance, ~~reporting~~lessors ~~periods~~will ~~beginning~~classify ~~after~~leases ~~December~~as 15operating, ~~2017~~direct financing, ~~including~~or ~~interim periods within that reporting period~~sales-type. ~~Earlier~~Lessors ~~application~~in isoperating ~~permitted~~leases ~~only~~will ascontinue ofto ~~annual~~recognize ~~reporting~~the ~~periods~~underlying ~~beginning~~asset ~~after~~and ~~December~~recognize ~~31,~~income ~~2016,~~on ~~including~~a ~~interim~~straight-line ~~reporting periods within that reporting period~~basis. ~~The~~Lessors ~~new~~determine ~~revenue~~whether ~~standard~~a ~~may~~lease beis ~~applied~~a ~~retrospectively~~sale toof ~~each~~the ~~prior~~underlying ~~period~~asset ~~presented~~based oron ~~retrospectively~~whether ~~with~~ the ~~cumulative~~lessee ~~effect~~effectively ~~recognized~~obtains ascontrol of the ~~date~~underlying ~~of adoption~~assets. ~~This~~ASU ~~guidance~~2016-02 is effective for ~~the~~fiscal ~~Company~~years beginning onafter ~~January~~December 115, 2018., ~~Management’s~~including ~~evaluation~~interim ofperiods ~~the~~within ~~impact~~those offiscal ~~such~~years. ~~adoption~~While onearly ~~the~~adoption ~~financial~~is ~~statements~~permitted, of the ~~Fund~~Company ~~indicates~~does ~~that~~not ~~such~~expect ~~impact~~to iselect ~~non-material~~that asoption. ~~the~~The ~~new~~Company ~~revenue~~expects ~~guideline~~to ~~does~~adopt ~~not~~the ~~affect~~guidance ~~revenues~~in ~~from~~the ~~leases~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~loans,~~2019 ~~which~~using ~~comprise~~ the ~~majority~~modified ofretrospective ~~the Company’s revenues~~method.

Management is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the financial statements and its operational and related disclosure requirements, including the impact on the Company’s current lease portfolio from a lessor perspective. As part of the adoption of the standard, the Company has selected and is in the process of implementing new lease accounting software. The Company is in the process of identifying and designing appropriate changes to its business processes, systems and controls to support the new standard. Given the limited changes to lessor accounting, Management does not expect material changes to recognition or measurement.

In July 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements (“ASU 2018-11”). The new standard provides a new transition method and practical expedient to simplify the application of the new leasing standard. Under the new transition method, comparative periods presented in the financial statements in the period of adoption will not need to be restated. Instead, a Company would initially apply the new lease requirements at the effective date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

retained earnings in the period of adoption. The Company would continue to report comparative periods presented in the financial statements in the period of adoption under current GAAP and provide the applicable required disclosures for such periods. The new practical expedient allows lessors to avoid separating lease and associated nonlease components within a contract if certain criteria are met. If elected, lessors will be able to aggregate nonlease components that otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue standard with the associated lease component if the following conditions are met (1) the timing and pattern of transfer of the nonlease component and the associated lease component are the same and (2) the stand-alone lease component would be classified as an operating lease if accounted for separately. For entities that have not adopted Topic 842 before the issuance of this Update, the effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update related to separating components of a contract are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Update 2016-02. The practical expedient may be elected either in the first reporting period following the issuance of this Update or at the original effective date of Topic 842 for that entity. The practical expedient may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on the financial statements and related disclosure requirements. The Company plans to adopt this guidance on January 1, 2019 and will prospectively apply the new lease requirements and recognize a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption. As part of the adoption, the Company has elected to apply the package of transitional practical expedients under which the Company will not reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification, and initial direct costs of existing leases as of the date of adoption. Under Topic 842, initial direct costs include only those incremental costs of a lease that would not have been incurred if the lease had not been executed. Therefore, only certain costs that the Company capitalized as initial direct costs under ASC Topic 840: Leases may be expensed as incurred under Topic 842. The Company expects an immaterial cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption. The Company plans to elect the lessor practical expedient to combine the lease and non-lease components. The Company expects that the lease components are the predominant component in the majority of its leasing arrangements and will account for the combined component as an operating lease under Topic 842. The Company currently does not believe the adoption will significantly affect the timing of the recognition of its combined lease and non-lease components.

In December 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors (“ASU 2018-20”). The new standard includes amendments related to sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from lessees, lessor costs paid by a lessee and recognition of variable payments for contracts with lease and non-lease components. The effective date in this Update is the same as that of ASU 2016-02, which is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2018-20 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016- 01”). The new standard provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01, among other things, (i) requires equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (ii) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment, (iii) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (iv) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, and (v) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 did have an impact on its financial statements and disclosures. The Company’s investment securities registered for public sale with readily determinable fair values are measured at fair value with any changes in fair value recognized in the Company's results of operations. The Company elected to record equity investments without readily determinable fair values at cost, less impairment, and adjusted for changes in observable prices. Any changes in the basis of these equity investments are reported in current earnings.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and in August 2015, issued Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. This guidance was effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures as revenues calculated under the new guidelines were substantially the same as had previously been determined.

3. Concentration of credit risk and major customers:

The Company leases equipment to lessees and provides debt financing to borrowers in diversified industries. Leases and notes receivable are subject to the Managing Member’s credit committee review. The leases and notes receivable provide for the return of the equipment to the Company upon default.

As of December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, there were concentrations (greater than or equal to 10% as a percentage of total equipment cost) of equipment leased to lessees and/or financed for borrowers in certain industries as follows:

Industry	~~2017~~2018			~~2016~~2017
Air transportation		2325	%		1923	%
Retail		22	%		19	%
Food products		25	%		18	%
Food products		18	%		14	%
Retail		22	%		22	%
Gas/Coal		17*	%		1417	%
Business services		*			10	%
Business Services		13	%		*

*During ~~Less~~2018 and 2017, certain lessees and/or financial borrowers generated significant portions (defined as greater than or equal to 10%) of the Company’s total leasing and lending revenues, excluding gains or losses on disposition of assets, as follows:

During 2017 and 2016, certain lessees and/or financial borrowers generated significant portions (defined as greater than or equal to 10%) of the Company’s total leasing and lending revenues, excluding gains or losses on disposition of assets, as follows:


			Percentage of Total Leasing Revenues
Aircraft Service International, Inc. Lessee	Type of Equipment		2018			2017
Aircraft Service International, Inc.		Aviation		25	%		25	%
Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC		Transportation		21	%		21	%
Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc.		Trucks and Trailers		15	%		15	%

			Percentage of Total Leasing and Lending Revenues
Lessee	Type of Equipment		2017			2016
Aircraft Service International, Inc.		Aviation		25	%		20	%
Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC		Transportation		21	%		17	%
Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc.		Transportation		15	%		12	%
IBM Corporation		Research		*			13	%

* Less than 10%

These percentages are not expected to be comparable in future periods due to anticipated changes in the mix of investments and/or lessees as a result of normal business activities.

4. Investments in equipment and leases, net:

	Balance December 31, 2016		Reclassifications, Additions/ Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance December 31, 2017
Net investment in operating leases	$	2,583	$	(361	)	$	(570	)	$	1,652
Net investment in direct financing leases		1		—			(1	)		—
Assets held for sale or lease, net		300		(28	)		—			272
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3 at December 31, 2017 and $4 at December 31, 2016		1		—			(1	)		—
Total	$	2,885	$	(389	)	$	(572	)	$	1,924

The Company’s investment in equipment and leases consists of the following (in thousands):


	Balance December 31, 2017		Reclassifications, Additions/ Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance December 31, 2018
Net investment in operating leases	$	1,652	$	(81	)	$	(229	)	$	1,342
Assets held for sale or lease, net		272		(72	)		—			200
Total	$	1,924	$	(153	)	$	(229	)	$	1,542

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. Investments in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

Impairment of investments in leases:

There was no fair value adjustment for impairment losses on investment in equipment and leases during 2018. The Company recorded $281 thousand ~~and $0~~ of fair value adjustments for impairment losses on its investments in equipment and leases during 2017 ~~and 2016, respectively~~.

~~Recorded~~The ~~values~~Company utilizes a straight line depreciation method over the term of the ~~Company’s~~equipment ~~leased~~lease ~~asset~~for ~~portfolio~~equipment ~~are~~on ~~reviewed~~operating ~~each~~leases ~~quarter~~currently toin ~~confirm~~its ~~the~~portfolio. ~~reasonableness~~Depreciation ofexpense ~~established~~on ~~residual~~the ~~values~~Company’s ~~and~~equipment tototaled ~~determine~~$229 ~~whether~~thousand ~~there~~and is$570 ~~indication~~thousand ~~that~~for anthe ~~asset~~years ~~impairment~~ended ~~might~~December ~~have~~31, ~~taken~~2018 ~~place~~and 2017, respectively.

The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than the net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances. As a result of these reviews, management determined that a $281 thousand impairment loss on equipment was deemed necessary for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded no fair value adjustments for impairment losses on its investments in equipment and leases during 2016.

The Company utilizes a straight line depreciation method over the term of the equipment lease for equipment on operating leases currently in its portfolio. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment totaled $570 thousand and $552 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

All of the Company’s lease asset purchases and capital improvements were made during the years from 2008 through 2013.

Operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2016			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance December 31, 2017
	Balance December 31, 2017			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance December 31, 2018
Transportation	$	3,963		$	—		$	—(121	)	$	3,~~963~~842
Construction		2,~~740~~741			—			(1,542	)		21,~~741~~199
Aviation		2,~~167~~077			—			~~(90~~—	)		2,077
Materials handling		254			—			(196	)		58
Other		104			—			—			104
Computer		87			—			(41	)		46
		8,885			—			(1,663	)		7,222
Manufacturing		664			—			(664	)		—
Less accumulated depreciation		(7,233	)		(229	)		1,582			(5,880	)
Other		1			—			(1	)		—
Total	$	1,652		$	(229	)	$	(81	)	$	1,342
		9,876			—			(991	)		8,885
Less accumulated depreciation		(7,293	)		(570	)		630			(7,233	)
Total	$	2,583		$	(570	)	$	(361	)	$	1,652

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 1916% and 2219% of the assets’ original cost at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, respectively. There were no operating leases in non-accrual status at both December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017.

24The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Equipment category	Useful Life
Aviation		15 – 20
Construction		7 – 10
Materials handling		7 – 10
Transportation		7 – 10
Computer		3 – 5

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. Investments in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

Direct financing leases:

As of December 31, 2016, investment in direct financing leases consisted of various types of materials handling equipment.

The components of the Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

	2016
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	1
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		—
Investment in direct financing leases		1
Less unearned income		—
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	1

As of December 31, 2016, there were no investments in direct financing leases in non-accrual status.

At December 31, 2017, the aggregate amounts of future minimum operating lease payments receivable are $313 thousand, all of which are due and receivable during 2018.

The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):

Equipment category	Useful Life
Aviation		15 – 20
Manufacturing		10 – 15
Construction		7 – 10
Materials handling		7 – 10
Transportation		7 – 10
Computer		3 – 5

5. Allowance for credit losses:

There was no allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2018. The Company's allowance for credit losses totaled $37 thousand ~~and $4 thousand~~ at December 31, 2017 ~~and December 31, 2016, respectively~~. All of such allowance were related to delinquent operating lease receivables.

The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments. 24

Each of AFS and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group, Inc. and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member or its affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Managing Member believes that the costs reimbursed are the lower of (i) actual costs incurred on behalf of the Company or (ii) the amount the Company would be required to pay independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates ~~earned~~for ~~fees~~providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and ~~billed~~lease and equipment documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for ~~reimbursements,~~services ~~pursuant~~whereby toit ~~the~~is ~~Operating~~entitled ~~Agreement,~~to ~~during~~receive ~~the~~a ~~years~~separate ~~ended~~fee ~~December~~as ~~31,~~compensation ~~2017~~for ~~and~~such ~~2016~~services, such as ~~follows~~management ~~(in~~of ~~thousands):~~investments.

	2017		2016
Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	169	$	160
Asset management fees to Managing Member		37		48
	$	206	$	208

The Fund’s Operating Agreement places an annual and cumulative limit for cost reimbursements to AFS and/or its affiliates. Any reimbursable costs incurred by AFS and/or affiliates during the year exceeding the annual and/or cumulative limits cannot be reimbursed in the current year, though such costs may be reimbursable in future years to the extent such amounts may be payable if within the annual and cumulative limits in such future years. The Fund is a finite life and self-liquidating entity, and AFS and its affiliates have no recourse against the Fund for the amount of any unpaid excess reimbursable administrative expenses. The Fund will continue to require administrative services from AFS and its affiliates through the end of its term, and will therefore continue to incur reimbursable administrative expenses in each year. The Fund has determined that payment of any amounts in excess of the annual and cumulative limits is not probable, and the date any portion of such amount may be paid, if ever, is uncertain. When the Fund completes its liquidation stage and terminates, any unpaid amount will expire unpaid, with no claim by AFS or its affiliates against any liquidation proceeds or any party for the unpaid balance. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company has not exceeded the annual and/or cumulative limitations discussed above.

The Managing Member and/or affiliates earned fees and billed for reimbursements, pursuant to the Operating Agreement, during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 as follows (in thousands):


	2018		2017
Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	122	$	169
Asset management fees to Managing Member		50		37
	$	172	$	206

7. Non-recourse debt:

At December 31, ~~2017~~2018, the non-recourse debt ~~consists~~was ofpaid ~~notes payable to financial institutions~~off. The notes are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes is at fixed rates ranging from 1.97% to 2.39% per annum. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At December 31, 2017, gross operating lease rentals totaled approximately $109 thousand over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $657 thousand. The notes mature at various dates in 2018.

~~The~~At December 31, 2017, non-recourse debt ~~does~~consisted ~~not~~of ~~contain~~notes ~~any~~payable ~~material~~to financial ~~covenants~~institutions. The ~~debt~~notes iswere ~~secured~~due byin amonthly ~~specific~~installments. ~~lien~~Interest ~~granted~~on by the ~~Company~~notes towas ~~the~~at ~~non-recourse~~fixed ~~lender~~rates onranging ~~(and~~from ~~only on) the discounted lease transactions~~1.97% ~~The lender has recourse only~~ to ~~the~~2.39% ~~following~~per ~~collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items~~annum. The ~~non-recourse~~notes ~~obligation~~were issecured ~~payable~~by ~~solely~~assignments ~~out~~ of ~~the~~lease ~~respective~~payments ~~specific security~~ and ~~the~~pledges ~~Company does not guarantee (nor is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment~~ of ~~the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company~~assets. ~~Although~~At ~~the~~December ~~Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted~~31, ~~the Company is directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations~~2017, ~~warranties,~~gross ~~and~~operating ~~covenants~~lease ~~made~~rentals tototaled ~~the~~approximately ~~lender,~~$109 ~~such~~thousand asover ~~warranties as to genuineness of~~ the ~~transaction~~remaining ~~parties’ signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective~~ lease ~~chattel~~terms; ~~paper~~and or the ~~transaction~~carrying asvalue aof ~~whole, or as to~~ the ~~Company’s~~pledged ~~good~~assets ~~title~~was to$657 or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and are viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligationsthousand. ~~Accordingly,~~The asnotes ~~there~~matured ~~are~~at novarious ~~financial~~dates ~~covenants or ratios imposed on the Company~~ in ~~connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure~~2018.

The ~~remaining~~non-recourse ~~future~~debt ~~minimum~~did ~~payments~~not ofcontain any material financial covenants. The debt was secured by a specific lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse ~~debt~~lender ~~total~~on ~~$104~~(and ~~thousand,~~only ~~all~~on) ofthe ~~which~~discounted ~~are~~lease ~~due~~transactions. The lender had recourse only to the following collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and ~~payable~~proceeds ~~during~~of ~~2018~~the foregoing items. The ~~payments~~non-recourse ~~are~~obligation ~~comprised~~was ofpayable ~~principal~~solely ~~payments~~out ~~totaling~~of ~~$103~~the ~~thousand~~respective specific security and ~~interest~~the ~~payments~~Company ~~totaling~~did $1not ~~thousand~~guarantee (nor was the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company did not

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. Non-recourse debt: - (continued)

have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted, the Company was directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to the lender, such as warranties as to genuineness of the transaction parties’ signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company’s good title to or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and were viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly, as there were no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company in connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company had determined that there were no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warranted footnote disclosure. At December 31, 2017, the remaining future minimum payments of non-recourse debt totaled $104 thousand, all of which were due and payable during 2018. The payments were comprised of principal payments totaling $103 thousand and interest payments totaling $1 thousand.

8. Commitments:

At December 31, ~~2017~~2018, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets and fund investments in notes receivable.

9. Guarantees:

The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The Managing Member knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Company’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Company believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Company’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Company would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. Members’ capital:

A total of 2,992,482 Units were issued and outstanding at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Member (Managing Member). The Fund was authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial Member.

The Company has the right, exercisable at the Managing Member’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Company is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the Managing Member on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the Managing Member deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Company; provided, the Company is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs. No units were repurchased during ~~2017~~2018 or ~~2016~~2017.

The Fund’s net income or net losses are to be allocated 100% to the Members. From the commencement of the Fund until the initial closing date, net income and net loss were allocated 99% to the Managing Member and 1% to the initial members. Commencing with the initial closing date, net income and net loss are to be allocated 92.5% to the Other Members and 7.5% to the Managing Member.

Fund distributions are to be allocated 7.5% to the Managing Member and 92.5% to the Other Members. The Company commenced periodic distributions in December 2008.

~~Distributions to the Other Members for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands except Units and per Unit data):~~ 26

	2017		2016
Distributions	$	818	$	2,693
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482		2,992,482
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	0.27	$	0.90

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. Members’ capital: - (continued)

Distributions to the Other Members for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in thousands except Units and per Unit data):


	2018		2017
Distributions	$	—	$	818
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482		2,992,482
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	—	$	0.27

11. Fair value measurements:

Under applicable accounting standards, fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

At December 31, 2018, the Company’s investment in securities and warrants were measured on a recurring basis. At December 31, 2017 only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis.

Fair value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, generally on a national exchange.

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

~~At December 31, 2017 and 2016, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis.~~ During 2017 ~~and 2016~~, the Company had non-recurring adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain assets deemed impaired.

The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

The fair value adjustments utilized the following methodology:

Warrants (recurring)

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $153 thousand and $149 thousand, respectively. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

Such fair value adjustments utilized the following methodology:

Warrants (recurring)

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $149 thousand and $159 thousand, respectively. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 recurring assets (in thousands):

	2017			2016
	2018			2017
Fair value of warrants at beginning of year	$	~~159~~149		$	~~327~~159
Unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants		(10	)		(168	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on fair valuation of warrants		4			(10	)
Fair value of warrants at end of year	$	~~149~~153		$	~~159~~149

ImpairedInvestment investment securities (non-recurring)

The Company’s investment securities ~~are not~~ registered for public sale, ~~and~~which are ~~carried~~recurring, atwith ~~cost.~~readily ~~The~~determinable ~~investment~~fair ~~securities~~values are ~~adjusted~~measured ~~for~~at ~~impairment,~~fair ifvalue with any, ~~based~~changes ~~upon~~in ~~factors~~fair ~~which~~value ~~include,~~recognized ~~but~~in ~~are not limited to, available financial information,~~ the ~~issuer~~Company’s ~~ability~~results ~~to meet its current obligations and indications~~ of ~~the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital~~operations.

~~During~~Factors ~~2017~~considered ~~and~~by ~~2016,~~ the ~~Company~~Managing ~~recorded~~Member ain determining fair value ~~adjustment~~include, ofbut ~~$219~~are ~~thousand~~not ~~and~~limited $0 to ~~reduce the cost basis of an impaired investment security~~, ~~respectively.~~available ~~The~~financial ~~reduction in value was based on a market approach technique and uses inputs that reflect qualitative and quantitative~~ information, ~~provided by~~ the ~~management~~issuer’s ofability ~~the~~to ~~investee.~~meet ~~Such~~its ~~information~~current ~~indicated~~obligations ~~reduced growth opportunity~~ and ~~eventual~~indications ~~reduction in cash flows and revenues. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic~~ of the ~~FASB~~issuer’s ~~Accounting~~subsequent ~~Standards~~ability ~~Codification,~~to ~~the~~raise ~~fair value of the aforementioned impaired investment securities were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy~~capital.

The fair value of investment securities that were accounted for on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and classified as Level 1 are as follows (in thousands):


	2018
Fair value of investment in securities at beginning of year	$	22
Unrealized gain on fair valuation of investment in securities		5
Fair value of investment in securities at end of year	$	27

Impaired off-lease equipment (non-recurring)

During 2017, the Company deemed certain off-lease equipment (assets) to be impaired and recorded fair value adjustments of $281 thousand to reduce the cost basis of the equipment. ~~During 2016, the Company had no fair value adjustments relative to impaired equipment.~~

The aforementioned adjustments were non-recurring. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair values of such impaired equipment are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy as the data sources utilized for the valuation of the assets reflect significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Such valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs that reflect the sales price of similar assets sold by affiliates and/or information from third party remarketing agents not readily available in the market.

The table below presents the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2017 (in thousands):


	December 31, 2017		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
Impaired off-lease equipment	$	273	$	—	$	—	$	273

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

The ~~table~~following ~~below~~tables ~~presents~~summarize the ~~fair~~valuation ~~value~~techniques ~~measurement~~and ofsignificant ~~assets~~unobservable ~~and~~inputs ~~liabilities~~used ~~measured~~for atthe ~~fair~~Company’s ~~value~~recurring onand a non-recurring ~~basis~~fair ~~and~~value ~~the~~calculation/adjustments ~~level~~categorized ~~within~~as ~~the~~Level ~~hierarchy~~3 in ~~which~~ the fair value ~~measurements~~hierarchy ~~fall~~ at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 ~~(in~~and ~~thousands)~~2017:

December 31, 2017

Level 1 Estimated Fair Value

Level 2 Estimated Fair Value

Level 3 Estimated Fair Value

December 31, 2018

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

Name

Valuation Frequency

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs

Range of Input Values

Impaired off-lease equipment

273

—

273

Warrants

Recurring

Black-Scholes formulation

Stock price

$0.05 – $9.98

Impaired investment securities

219

—

219

Exercise price

$0.36 – $38.64

Time to maturity (in years)

1.99 – 4.84

Risk-free interest rate

2.47% – 2.51%

Annualized volatility

47.58% – 70.27%

The following tables summarize the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s recurring and non-recurring fair value calculation/adjustments categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2017 and 2016:


December 31, 2017
Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes formulation	Stock price	$0.02 – $14.75
			Exercise price	$0.36 – $25.76
			Time to maturity (in years)	0.75 – 5.84
			Risk-free interest rate	1.65% – 2.25%
			Annualized volatility	48.32% – 83.30%
Impaired off-lease equipment	Non-recurring	Market Approach	Third Party Agents’ pricing Quotes – Per Equipment	$72,525 – $200,000 (total of $610,000)
			Equipment Condition	Good

December 31, 2017
Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes formulation	Stock price	$0.02 – $14.75
			Exercise price	$0.36 – $25.76
			Time to maturity (in years)	0.75 – 5.84
			Risk-free interest rate	1.65% – 2.25%
			Annualized volatility	48.32% – 83.30%
Impaired off-lease equipment	Non-recurring	Market Approach	Third Party Agents’ pricing Quotes – Per Equipment	$72,525 – $200,000
			Equipment Condition	Good
Investment Securities	Non-recurring	Market Approach	Qualitative and quantitative	Not Applicable

December 31, 2016
Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes formulation	Stock price	$0.01 – $14.75
			Exercise price	$0.14 – $25.76
			Time to maturity (in years)	0.13 – 6.84
			Risk-free interest rate	0.48% – 2.22%
			Annualized volatility	49.69% – 103.87%

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company determines the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is generally estimated based upon various methodologies deployed by financial and credit management including, but not limited to, credit analysis, third party appraisal and/or discounted cash flow analysis based upon current market valuation techniques and market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, which may consider adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary.

Investment in securities

The Company’s ~~investment~~purchased securities ~~are not~~ registered for public sale ~~and~~with readily determinable fair value are carried at ~~cost~~fair ~~which~~value. ~~management~~These ~~believes~~investment ~~approximates~~securities ~~fair~~are ~~value,~~valued asbased ~~appropriately~~on ~~adjusted~~their ~~for~~quoted ~~impairment~~market price.

Non-recourse and Long-term debt

The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse and long-term debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Commitments and Contingencies

Management has determined that no recognition for the fair value of the Company’s loan commitments is necessary because their terms are made on a market rate basis and require borrowers to be in compliance with the Company’s credit requirements at the time of funding.

The fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred. 29

The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	479	$	479	$	—	$	—	$	479
Investment in securities		27		—		—		27		27
Warrants, fair value		149		—		—		149		149
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		103		—		—		102		102

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,033	$	1,033	$	—	$	—	$	1,033
Investment in securities		272		—		—		272		272
Warrants, fair value		159		—		—		159		159
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		566		—		—		566		566

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ItemATEL 9.12, CHANGESLLC INNOTES ANDTO DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURESSTATEMENTS

None11. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

~~Item~~The ~~9A.~~fair ~~CONTROLS~~value ~~AND~~of ~~PROCEDURES~~contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred.


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,524	$	1,524	$	—	$	—	$	1,524
Investment in securities		27		27		—		—		27
Warrants, fair value		153		—		—		153		153


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	479	$	479	$	—	$	—	$	479
Warrants, fair value		149		—		—		149		149
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		103		—		—		102		102

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

Item 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company’s Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the Managing Member, who is responsible for providing the Company with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Managing Member’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Company, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Management of the Managing Member is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) for the Company, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2017~~2018. The internal control process of the Managing Member, as it is applicable to the Company, was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of the Management of the Managing Member; and

(2)

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All internal control processes, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those processes determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management of the Managing Member assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, as of December 31, ~~2017~~2018. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment, Management of the Managing Member concluded that the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, was effective as of December 31, ~~2017~~2018.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This annual report does not include an audit report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s internal control over financial reporting was not subject to audit by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which exempts non-accelerated filers from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, during the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III

Item 10.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

The registrant is a Limited Liability Company and has no officers or directors.

ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS” or “Managing Member” or “Manager”) is the Company’s Managing Member, and is, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group (“ACG” or “ATEL”). The outstanding voting capital stock of ATEL is owned 100% by Dean L. Cash.

Each of AFS and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ACG and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations and communications services, and general administrative services are performed by AFS. ATEL Securities Corporation (“ASC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AFS, performs distribution services in connection with the Company’s public offering of its Units.

The officers and directors of ATEL and its affiliates are as follows:


Dean L. Cash		Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
Paritosh K. Choksi		Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
Vasco H. Morais		Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

Dean L. Cash, age 6768, became chairman, president and chief executive officer of ATEL in April 2001. Mr. Cash joined ATEL as director of marketing in 1980 and served as a vice president since 1981, executive vice president since 1983 and a director since 1984. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Cash was a senior marketing representative for Martin Marietta Corporation, data systems division, from 1979 to 1980. From 1977 to 1979, he was employed by General Electric Corporation, where he was an applications specialist in the medical systems division and a marketing representative in the information services division. Mr. Cash was a systems engineer with Electronic Data Systems from 1975 to 1977, and was involved in maintaining and developing software for commercial applications. Mr. Cash received a B.S. degree in psychology and mathematics in 1972 and an M.B.A. degree with a concentration in finance in 1975 from Florida State University. Mr. Cash is an arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association and is qualified as a registered principal with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Paritosh K. Choksi, age 6465, joined ATEL in 1999 as a director, senior vice president and its chief financial officer. He became its executive vice president and CFO/COO in April 2001. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Choksi was chief financial officer at Wink Communications, Inc. from 1997 to 1999. From 1977 to 1997, Mr. Choksi was with Phoenix American Incorporated, a financial services and management company, where he held various positions during his tenure, and was senior vice president, chief financial officer and director when he left the company. Mr. Choksi was involved in all corporate matters at Phoenix and was responsible for Phoenix’s capital market needs. He also served on the credit committee overseeing all corporate investments, including its venture lease portfolio. Mr. Choksi was a part of the executive management team which caused Phoenix’s portfolio to increase from $50 million in assets to over $2 billion. Mr. Choksi is a member of the board of directors of Syntel, Inc. Mr. Choksi received a bachelor of technology degree in mechanical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay; and an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

Vasco H. Morais, age 5960, joined ATEL in 1989 as general counsel. Mr. Morais manages ATEL’s legal department, which provides legal and contractual support in the negotiating, documenting, drafting, reviewing and funding of lease transactions. In addition, Mr. Morais advises on general corporate law matters, and assists on securities law issues. From 1986 to 1989, Mr. Morais was employed by the BankAmeriLease Companies, Bank of America’s equipment leasing subsidiaries, providing in-house legal support on the documentation of tax-oriented and non-tax oriented direct and leveraged lease transactions, vendor leasing programs and general corporate matters. Prior to the BankAmeriLease Companies, Mr. Morais was with the Consolidated Capital Companies in the Corporate and Securities Legal Department involved in drafting and reviewing contracts, advising on corporate law matters and securities law issues. Mr. Morais received a B.A. degree in 1982 from the University of California in Berkeley, a J.D. degree in 1986 from

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golden Gate University Law School; and an M.B.A. (Finance) degree from Golden Gate University in 1997. Mr. Morais, an active member of the State Bar of California since 1986, served as co-chair of the Uniform Business Law Section of the State Bar of California and was inducted as a fellow of the American College of Commercial Finance Lawyers in 2010.

Audit Committee

The board of directors of the Managing Member acts as the audit committee of the Company. Dean L. Cash and Paritosh K. Choksi are members of the board of directors of the Managing Member and are deemed to be financial experts. They are not independent of the Company.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5, the Company is not aware of any failures to file reports of beneficial ownership required to be filed during or for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018.

Code of Ethics

A Code of Ethics that is applicable to the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of its Manager, ATEL Financial Services, LLC, or persons acting in such capacity on behalf of the Company, is included as Exhibit 14.1 to this report.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The registrant has no officers or directors.

Set forth hereinafter is a description of the nature of remuneration paid and to be paid to the Manager and its affiliates. The amount of such remuneration paid for the years ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 is set forth in Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions,” at Note 7 thereof, which information is hereby incorporated by reference.

Asset Management Fee and Carried Interest

The Company pays the Manager an annual Asset Management Fee in an amount equal to 4% of Gross Operating Lease Revenues and Cash from Sales or Refinancing. The Asset Management Fee is paid on a monthly basis. The amount of the Asset Management Fee payable in any year is reduced for that year to the extent it would otherwise exceed the Asset Management Fee Limit, as described below. The Asset Management Fee is paid for services rendered by the Manager and its affiliates in determining portfolio and investment strategies and generally managing or supervising the management of the investment portfolio.

The Manager supervises performance of all management activities, including, among other activities: the acquisition and financing of the investment portfolio, collection of lease and loan revenues, monitoring compliance by lessees borrowers with their contract terms, assuring that investment assets are being used in accordance with all operative contractual arrangements, paying operating expenses and arranging for necessary maintenance and repair of equipment and property in the event a lessee fails to do so, monitoring property, sales and use tax compliance and preparation of operating financial data. The Manager intends to delegate all or a portion of its duties and the Asset Management Fee to one or more of its affiliates who are in the business of providing such services.

The Manager also receives, as its Carried Interest, an amount equal to 7.5% of all Company Distributions.

Limitations on Fees

The Fund has adopted a single Asset Management Fee plus the Carried Interest as a means of compensating the Manager for sponsoring the Fund and managing its operations. While this compensation structure is intended to simplify management compensation for purposes of investor’s understanding, state securities administrators use a more complicated compensation structure in their review of equipment program offerings in order to assure that those offerings are fair under the states’ merit review guidelines. The total of all Front End Fees, the Carried Interest and the Asset Management Fee will be subject to the Asset Management Fee Limit in order to assure these state administrators that the Fund will not bear greater fees than permitted under the state merit review guidelines. The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (“NASAA”) is an organization of state securities administrators, those state government agencies responsible for qualifying securities offerings in their respective states. NASAA has established

TABLE OF CONTENTS

standards for the qualification of a number of different types of securities offerings and investment products, including its Statement of Policy on Equipment Programs (the “NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines”). Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines establish the standards for payment of reasonable carried interests, promotional interests and fees for equipment acquisition, management, resale and releasing services to equipment leasing program sponsors. Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines set the maximum compensation payable to the sponsor and its affiliates from an equipment leasing program such as the Fund. The Asset Management Fee Limit will equal the maximum compensation payable under Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines as in effect on the date of the Fund’s prospectus (the “NASAA Fee Limitation”). Under the Asset Management Fee Limit, the Fund will calculate the maximum fees payable under the NASAA Fee Limitation and guarantee that the Asset Management Fee it will pay the Manager and its Affiliates, when added to its Carried Interest, will never exceed the fees and interest payable to a sponsor and its affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation.

Asset Management Fee Limit. The Asset Management Fee Limit will be calculated each year during the Fund’s term by calculating the total fees that would be paid to the Manager if the Manager were to be compensated on the basis of the maximum compensation payable under the NASAA Fee Limitation, including the Manager’s Carried Interest, as described below. To the extent that the amount paid as Front End Fees, the Asset Management Fee, and the Carried Interest for any year would cause the total fees to exceed the aggregate amount of fees calculated under the NASAA Fee Limitation for the year, the Asset Management Fee and/or Carried Interest for that year will be reduced to equal the maximum aggregate fees under the NASAA Fee Limitation. To the extent any such fees are reduced, the amount of such reduction will be accrued and deferred, and such accrued and deferred compensation would be paid to the Manager in a subsequent period, but only to the extent that the deferred compensation would be within the Asset Management Fee Limit for that later period. Any deferred fees that cannot be paid under the applicable limitations through the date of liquidation would be forfeited by the Manager at liquidation.

Under the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines, the Fund is required to commit a minimum percentage of the Gross Proceeds to Investment in Equipment, calculated as the greater of: (i) 80% of the Gross Proceeds reduced by 0.0625% for each 1% of indebtedness encumbering the Fund’s equipment; or (ii) 75% of such Gross Proceeds. The Fund intends to incur total indebtedness equal to 50% of the aggregate cost of its equipment. The Operating Agreement requires the Fund to commit at least 85.875% of the Gross Proceeds to Investment in Equipment. Based on the formula in the NASAA Guidelines, the Fund’s minimum Investment in Equipment would equal 76.875% of Gross Proceeds (80% - [50% × .0625%] = 76.875%), and the Fund’s minimum Investment in Equipment would therefore exceed the NASAA Fee Limitation minimum by 9%.

The amount of the Carried Interest permitted the Manager under the NASAA Fee Limitation will be dependent on the amount by which the percentage of Gross Proceeds the Fund ultimately commits to Investment in Equipment exceeds the minimum Investment in Equipment under the NASAA Fee Limitation. The NASAA Fee Limitation permits the Manager and its Affiliates to receive compensation in the form of a carried interest in Fund Net Income, Net Loss and Distributions equal to 1% for the first 2.5% of excess Investment in Equipment over the NASAA Guidelines minimum, 1% for the next 2% of such excess, and 1% for each additional 1% of excess Investment in Equipment. With a minimum Investment in Equipment of 85.875%, the Manager and its Affiliates may receive an additional carried interest equal to 6.5% of Net Profit, Net Loss and Distributions under the foregoing formula (2.5% + 2% + 4.5% = 9%; 1% + 1% + 4.5% = 6.5%). At the lowest permitted level of Investment in Equipment, the NASAA Guidelines would permit the Manager and its Affiliates to receive a promotional interest equal to 5% of Distributions of Cash from Operations and 1% of Distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds until Members have received total Distributions equal to their Original Invested Capital plus an 8% per annum cumulative return on their Adjusted Invested Capital, and, thereafter, the promotional interest may increase to 15% of all Distributions.

With the additional carried interest calculated as described above, the maximum aggregate fees payable to the Manager and Affiliates under the NASAA Guidelines as carried interest and promotional interest would equal 11.5% of Distributions of Cash from Operations (6.5% + 5% = 11.5%), and 7.5% of Distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds (6.5% + 1% = 7.5%), before the subordination level was reached, and 21.5% of all Distributions thereafter. The maximum amounts to be paid under the terms of the Operating Agreement are subject to the application of the Asset Management Fee Limit provided in Section 8.3 of the Agreement, which limits the annual amount payable to the Manager and its Affiliates as the Asset Management Fee and the Carried Interest to an aggregate not to exceed the total amount of fees that would be payable to the Manager and its Affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation.

Upon completion of the offering of Units, final commitment of offering proceeds to acquisition of equipment and establishment of final levels of permanent portfolio debt, the Manager will calculate the maximum carried interest and promotional interest payable to the Manager and its Affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation and compare such total permitted fees to the total of the Asset Management Fee and Manager’s Carried Interest. If and to the extent that the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Asset Management Fee and Manager’s Carried Interest would exceed the fees calculated under the NASAA Fee Limitation, the fees payable to the Manager and its Affiliates will be reduced by an amount sufficient to cause the total of such compensation to comply with the NASAA Fee Limitation. The adjusted Asset Management Fee Limit will then be applied to the Asset Management Fee and Carried Interest as described above. A comparison of the Front End Fees actually paid by the Fund and the NASAA Fee Limitation maximums will be repeated, and any required adjustments will be made, at least annually thereafter.

See Note 6 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for amounts paid.

Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

At December 31, ~~2017~~2018, no investor is known to hold beneficially more than 5% of the issued and outstanding Units.

Security Ownership of Management

The parent of ATEL Financial Services, LLC is the beneficial owner of Limited Liability Company Units as follows:


(1) Title of Class	(2) Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	(3) Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	(4) Percent of Class
Limited Liability Company Units	ATEL Capital Group The Transamerica Pyramid 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111	Initial Limited Liability Company Units 50 Units ($500)	0.0017%

See Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions” at Note 6 thereof.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

During the years ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, the Company incurred audit fees with its principal auditors totaling $9753 thousand and $8297 thousand, respectively.

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees and expenses billed in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

The board of directors of the Managing Member acts as the audit committee of the registrant. Engagements for audit services, audit related services and tax services are approved in advance by the Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Member acting on behalf of the board of directors of the Managing Member in its role as the audit committee of the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

Financial Statements and Schedules

Financial Statements

Included in Part II of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			11
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016			12
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017			12
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016			13
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017			13
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016			14
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017			14
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016			15
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017			15
Notes to Financial Statements			16

Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

(b)

Exhibits

(3) and (4) Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement, included as exhibit B to the Prospectus effective September 26, 2007 as filed on October 2, 2007 (File Number 333-142034) is hereby incorporated herein by reference

(14.1)		Code of Ethics
(31.1)		Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(31.2)		Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(32.1)		Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
(32.2)		Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
(101.INS)		XBRL Instance Document
(101.SCH)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
(101.CAL)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
(101.DEF)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
(101.LAB)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
(101.PRE)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
(101.DEF)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 2615, ~~2018~~2019

ATEL 12, LLC (Registrant)

By:

ATEL Financial Services, LLC
Managing Member of Registrant

By:

/s/ Dean L. Cash

Dean L. Cash,
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, (Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi

Paritosh K. Choksi,
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Samuel Schussler

Samuel Schussler,
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE	CAPACITIES	DATE
/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, (Managing Member)	March 2615, ~~2018~~2019
/s/ Paritosh K. ChoksiParitosh K. Choksi	Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)	March 2615, ~~2018~~2019
/s/ Samuel SchusslerSamuel Schussler	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)	March 2615, ~~2018~~2019

No proxy materials have been or will be sent to security holders. An annual report will be furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing of this report on Form 10-K, and copies thereof will be furnished supplementally to the Commission when forwarded to the security holders.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission File number 000-53618

ATEL 12, LLC

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

Narrative Description of Business

Equipment Leasing Activities

Notes Receivable Activities

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

PART II

Market Information

Holders

Fund Valuation

Background to Fund Valuation

Methodologies

Net Investment Methodology

Appraised Value Methodology

Unit Valuation

Disclosure

Specifics Underlying Valuation Methodology:

Notes and Explanation of Valuation Components and Calculation

ATEL 12, LLC Unit Valuation

Disclaimer

Distributions

Overview

Results of Operations

20172018 versus 20162017

Revenues

Expenses

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Cash Flows

20172018 versus 20162017

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

Distributions

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ATEL 12, LLC BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, 2017 (In Thousands)

ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017 (In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017(In Thousands)

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Use of Estimates:

Accounts receivable:

Credit risk:

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Direct financing leases and related revenue recognition:

Notes receivable, unearned interest income and related revenue recognition:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Initial direct costs:

Acquisition expense:

Asset valuation:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Investment in securities:

Purchased securities

Warrants

Unearned operating lease income:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

TheIncome tax bases of the Company’s net assets and liabilities vary from the amounts presented in these financial statements at December 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands)Taxes:

Per Unit data:

Recent accounting pronouncements:

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

ATEL 12, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Thousands)

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
(In Thousands)

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Filing Compare · ATEL 12, LLC