UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x		Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
		For the year ended December 31, 2016
		For the year ended December 31, 2017
o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
		For the transition period from to

Commission File number 333000-14203453618

ATEL 12, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


California		20-8712853
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 989-8800

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Liability Company Units

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes o No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934. Yes o No x

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company x

Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

State the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: Not applicable

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Not applicable

The number of Limited Liability Company Units outstanding as of February 28, ~~2017~~2018 was 2,992,482

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on January 25, 2007 (“Date of Inception”) for the purpose of equipment financing and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. From its inception into the third quarter of 2013, the Company’s Managing Member was ATEL Associates 12, LLC (“AA12”), a Nevada limited liability company. Effective September 30, 2013, AA12 was merged into ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS” or “Managing Member” or “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group. The Fund may continue until December 31, 2030. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member.

The Company conducted a public offering of 20,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. As of January 24, 2008, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1.2 million), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations and continued in its development stage activities until transitioning to an operating enterprise during the second quarter of 2008. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and are released to the Fund only when aggregate subscriptions for all investors equal to at least $7.5 million. Total contributions to the Fund exceeded $7.5 million on July 15, 2008, at which time a request was processed to release the Pennsylvania escrowed amounts. The offering was terminated on September 25, 2009.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, cumulative gross contributions, less rescissions and repurchases (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs, as applicable), totaling $29.9 million (inclusive of the $500 initial Member’s capital investment) have been received. As of the same date, 2,992,482 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Company’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unitholders, with any balance remaining after required minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional investments during the Reinvestment Period (ending six calendar years after the completion of the Company’s public offering of Units) and (iii) provide additional cash distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all investment portfolio assets has been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by the ATEL 12, LLC amended and restated Limited Liability Company Operating agreement dated April 3, 2007 (the “Operating Agreement”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, the Managing Member and/or its affiliates receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 76, Related party transactions, as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of the Managing Member.

On January 1, 2016, the Company commenced liquidation phase activities pursuant to the guidelines of the Operating Agreement. Prior thereto, the Company was in its acquisition phase and was making distributions on a monthly and quarterly basis. During the liquidation phase, periodic distributions are paid at the discretion of the Managing Member.

Narrative Description of Business

The Company had acquired various types of new and used equipment subject to leases and made loans secured by equipment acquired by its borrowers. The Company’s primary investment objective was to acquire investments primarily in low-technology, low-obsolescence equipment such as the core operating equipment used by companies in the manufacturing, mining and transportation industries. A portion of the portfolio would include some more technology-dependent equipment such as certain types of communications equipment, medical equipment, manufacturing equipment and office equipment. The Company sought investments in equipment or financing of equipment and business involving “green technologies” such as those involved in the following activities: materials recycling, water purification, sewage treatment pollution radiation, gas and other emission treatment, solid waste management, renewable energy generation, as well as many other similar industries and activities.

~~The~~TABLE ~~Company~~OF purchased equipment under pre-existing leases or for which a lease was entered into concurrently at the time of the purchase. Through December 31, 2016, the Company had purchased equipment with a total acquisition price of $28.6 million. The Company had also funded investments in notes receivable totaling $5.4 million through December 31, 2016. CONTENTS

The Company purchased equipment under pre-existing leases or for which a lease was entered into concurrently at the time of the purchase. Through December 31, 2017, the Company had purchased equipment with a total acquisition price of $28.6 million. The Company had also funded investments in notes receivable totaling $5.4 million through December 31, 2017.

The Company’s objective was to have at least 60% of its investment portfolio (by cost) consist of equipment leased to lessees that the Manager deems to be high quality corporate credits and/or leases guaranteed by such high quality corporate credits. High quality corporate credits were lessees or guarantors who have a credit rating by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. of “Baa” or better, or the credit equivalent as determined by the Manager, or were public and private corporations with substantial revenues and histories of profitable operations, as well as established hospitals with histories of profitability or municipalities. The remaining 40% of the initial investment portfolio would include equipment lease transactions, real property single tenant net leases and other financing for companies which, although deemed creditworthy by the Manager, would not satisfy the specific credit criteria for the portfolio described above. Included in this 40% of the portfolio may be growth capital financing investments. No more than 20% of the initial portfolio, by cost, would consist of these growth capital financing investments and no more than 20% of the portfolio, by cost, would consist of real estate investments. The Company’s objective was to invest approximately 25% of its capital in assets that involve “green” technologies or applications as discussed above.

The equipment financing industry is highly competitive. Equipment manufacturers, corporations, partnerships and others offer users an alternative to the purchase of most types of equipment with payment terms that vary widely depending on the type of financing, the lease or loan term and type of equipment. The ability of the Company to keep the equipment leased and the terms of purchase, lease and sale of equipment depends on various factors (many of which neither the Managing Member nor the Company can control), such as general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation or recession, and fluctuations in supply and demand for various types of equipment resulting from, among other things, technological and economic obsolescence.

The Managing Member will use its best efforts to diversify lessees by geography and industry and to maintain an appropriate balance and diversity in the types of equipment acquired and the types of leases entered into by the Company, and will apply the following policies: (i) The Managing Member will seek to limit the amount invested in equipment or property leased to any single lessee to not more than 20% of the aggregate purchase price of investments as of the final commitment of net offering proceeds; (ii) in no event will the Company’s equity investment in equipment or property leased to a single lessee exceed an amount equal to 20% of the maximum capital from the sale of Units (or $30,000,000); and (iii) the Managing Member will seek to invest not more than 20% of the aggregate purchase price of equipment in equipment acquired from a single manufacturer. However, this last limitation is a general guideline only, and the Company may acquire equipment from a single manufacturer in excess of the stated percentage during the offering period and before the offering proceeds are fully invested, or if the Managing Member deems such a course of action to be in the Company’s best interest.

The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks leasing opportunities is North America. All of the Company’s current operating revenues and long-lived assets relate to customers domiciled in United States.

The business of the Company is not seasonal. The Company has no full time employees. Employees of the Managing Member and affiliates provide the services the Company requires to effectively operate. The cost of these services is reimbursed by the Company to the Managing Member and affiliates per the Operating Agreement.

For further information refer to the financial statements and footnotes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Equipment Leasing Activities

The Company has acquired a diversified portfolio of equipment. The equipment, all currently located in the United States, has been leased to lessees in various industries. The following tables set forth the types of equipment acquired by the Company through December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and the industries to which the assets have been leased (dollars in thousands):


Asset Types	Purchase Price Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Acquisitions
Materials handling	$	7,801		27.24	%
Transportation		4,934		17.23	%
Research		3,963		13.84	%
Manufacturing		3,518		12.29	%
Construction		2,989		10.44	%
Mining		2,893		10.10	%
Aviation		2,167		7.57	%
Other		370		1.29	%
	$	28,635		100.00	%

Industry of Lessee	Purchase Price ~~ExcludingAcquisition~~Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of ~~TotalAcquisitions~~Total Acquisitions
Business services	$	6,569		22.94	%
Gas/Coal products		4,684		16.36	%
Retail		2,903		10.14	%
Food products		2,877		10.05	%
Rubber/Miscellaneous plastics		2,764		9.65	%
Air transportation		2,167		7.57	%
Lumber/Wood products		1,680		5.87	%
Transportation services		1,644		5.74	%
Manufacturing		895		3.13	%
Chemical products		863		3.01	%
Industrial machinery		783		2.73	%
Other		806		2.81	%
	$	28,635		100.00	%

From inception to December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company has disposed of certain leased assets as set forth below (in thousands):

Asset Types	Original Equipment Cost ~~ExcludingAcquisition~~Excluding Acquisition Fees		Sale Price		Gross Rents
Materials handling	$	6,~~684~~977	$	1,~~293~~375	$	7,~~459~~906
Research		3,964		713		3,425
Mining		2,893		1,908		2,517
Manufacturing		1,780		1,185		1,345
Construction		833		112		979
Transportation		~~249~~388		90123		~~231~~403
Other		186		62		240
Aviation		90		8		97
	$	16,589	$	5,363	$	16,196
Other		227		69		440
	$	17,152	$	5,493	$	17,112

For further information regarding the Company’s equipment lease portfolio as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, see Note 54, Investments in equipment and leases, net, as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Notes Receivable Activities

The Company finances assets in diverse industries. The following tables set forth the types of assets financed by the Company through December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and the industries to which the assets have been financed (dollars in thousands):


Asset Types	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Fundings
Miscellaneous office equipment	$	3,484		65.05	%
Research		804		15.01	%
Computers		599		11.18	%
Manufacturing		400		7.47	%
Other		69		1.29	%
	$	5,356		100.00	%


Industry of Borrower	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Fundings
Health services	$	1,569		29.29	%
Electronics		1,055		19.70	%
Manufacturing		805		15.03	%
Engineering/Management		750		14.00	%
Business services		578		10.79	%
Lab equipment		399		7.45	%
Chemicals/Allied products		200		3.74	%
	$	5,356		100.00	%

From inception to December 31, ~~2016~~2017, assets financed by the Company that are associated with terminated loans are as follows (in thousands):

Asset Types	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		~~Disposition~~Early Termination of Notes Proceeds		Total Payments Received
Miscellaneous office equipment	$	23,~~983~~484	$	606	$	23,~~448~~040
Research		804		258		716
Computers		599		—		760
Manufacturing		400		—		498
Other		69		53		28
	$	45,~~855~~356	$	917	$	45,~~450~~042

~~For~~As ~~further information regarding the Company’s notes receivable portfolio as~~ of December 31, ~~2016,~~2017 ~~see~~and ~~Note 4~~2016, ~~Notes~~the ~~receivable,~~Company ~~net,~~had asno ~~set~~notes ~~forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data~~receivable.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Company does not own or lease any real property, plant or material physical properties other than the equipment held for lease as set forth in Item 1.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Company. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. No material legal proceedings are currently pending against the Company or against any of its assets.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

Item 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There are certain material conditions and restrictions on the transfer of Units imposed by the terms of the Operating Agreement. Consequently, there is no public market for Units and it is not anticipated that a public market for Units will develop. In the absence of a public market for the Units, there is no currently ascertainable fair market value for the Units.

Fund Valuation

Background to Fund Valuation

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) updated rules for the presentation of account statement values relative to pricing of Direct Placement Program (“DPP”) shares. Under FINRA Notice 15-02 (the “Notice”) the SEC approved amendments to National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) Rule 2340, Customer Account Statements, and FINRA rule 2310, which address a FINRA member firm’s participation in a public offering of a DPP. In summary, the amendments require a FINRA member firm to include in the account statements for customers holding DPP securities a per share value for the DPP. This per share value must be prepared by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service. The results of this valuation must be disclosed in the issuer’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A valuation in compliance with the Notice must be undertaken and published on at least an annual basis.

The effective date of the Notice was April 11, 2016.

Methodologies

Broker dealers are required to provide a per share estimated value on the customer account statements for each non-listed DPP security held by their customers. Such estimated value must have been developed in a manner reasonably designed to provide a reliable value. Two valuation methodologies have been defined by FINRA, which by such designation are presumed to be reliable.

Net Investment Methodology

The amendments to NASD Rule 2340(c)(1)(A) require “net investment” to be based on the “amount available for investment” percentage disclosed in the “Estimated Use of Proceeds” section of the issuer’s offering prospectus. In essence, such value is equal to the offering price less selling commissions, other offering and organization expenses, and capital reserves. This method may be used for up to 150 days following the second anniversary of a Fund breaking escrow.

Appraised Value Methodology

As amended, Rule NASD 2340(c)(1)(B) requires that the per share estimated value disclosed in an issuer’s most recent periodic or current report be based upon an appraisal of the assets and liabilities of the program by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service, in conformity with standard industry valuation practice as it relates to both the aforementioned assets and liabilities. No later than 150 days following the second anniversary of the issuer’s break of escrow for its minimum offering, this methodology must be used to establish the required estimated values.

Unit Valuation

The per Unit valuation estimate for ATEL 12, LLC has been conducted, and the results disclosed herein, in compliance with the mandates of the Notice.

For ATEL 12, LLC, its estimated value per Unit reflects the Manager’s estimate of current portfolio valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Fund, calculated on a per Unit basis, and as such, does not represent a market value for the Units and may not accurately reflect the value of the Fund Units to the Unit holders if held over time to Fund maturity.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In connection with any estimate of per Unit value, Unit holders and all parties are reminded that no public market for the Units exists. Additionally, in order to preserve the Fund’s pass-through status for federal income tax purposes, the Fund will not permit a secondary market or the substantial equivalent of a secondary market for the Units. In the absence of a public market for the Units, there is no currently ascertainable fair market value for the Units.

The estimate of per Unit value does not take into account any extraordinary potential future business activity of the Fund; rather the valuation represents a snapshot view of the Fund’s portfolio as of the valuation date. In addition, the Fund does not include any analysis of the distributions that have already been paid by the Fund, nor the anticipated returns to Unit holder over the full course of the Fund life cycle, which will be dependent on many factors.

Disclosure

The estimated value per Unit reported in this Form 10-K has been calculated using the “Appraised Value Methodology” described above under “Methodologies” above, as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

ATEL 12, LLC, will satisfy the disclosure requirements for providing estimated per Unit values pursuant to the Notice as follows:

For these disclosures, subsequent to the Fund's initial compliance with FINRA 15-02, annual disclosures of estimated per Unit values, through the termination of the Fund; will be accomplished and included on an annual basis in a document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission available to the public.

Specifics Underlying Valuation Methodology:

Notes and Explanation of Valuation Components and Calculation

A. Fund Assets and Liabilities (other than as specifically identified below): The estimated values for non-interest bearing items such as current assets and liabilities are assumed to equal their reported GAAP balances as an appropriate approximation of their fair values. Debt (interest bearing) is assumed to equal the fair values of the debt as disclosed in the footnotes of the ~~10-K~~financial statements.

Investments in Leases (net of fees and expenses): The estimated values for Investments in Leases are based on calculating the present value of the projected future cash flows. Projected future cash flows include both the remaining contractual lease payments, plus assumptions on lease renewals and sale value of the residuals. Projected future cash flows are net of projected future fees and expenses including:

•

management fees applicable for the Fund (4.00% of revenue)

•

carried interest applicable for the Fund (7.50% of distributions)

• operating expenses which are assumed to be ~~2.50~~3% of original equipment costs for the Fund

Projected future cash flows have been discounted back to present value at discount rates based on like-term U.S. Treasury yields (as of the valuation date) plus a ~~300~~400 basis point spread, to account for the credit risk differentials between the instrument being valued and U.S. Treasury security yields.

Residual values assumptions used in the cash flow projections are as follows:

For On-Lease and Month-to-Month Lease: Considers realized residual as a percent of book residual of ~~162~~165.89%, based on ATEL’s historical track record as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. ~~In addition, an annual inflation rate of 2.50% has been assumed.~~

For Off-Lease: A fair value of off-lease equipment is based on estimates from ATEL’s seasoned Asset Management Group.

Special Situation Leases: The valuation of certain leases has been performed outside of the above noted protocol based upon specific lease assumptions different than the macro assumptions above, due to the specific situations of those leases.

Investments in Notes Receivable: The estimated values for Investments in Notes Receivable are assumed to approximate the reported GAAP balances.

D.TABLE ~~Investments~~OF in Marketable Securities: The estimated values for Marketable Securities have been based on the estimated net book value as of the valuation date (with impairment adjustments), plus any unrealized gain on equity. The unrealized gain on equity is based on either: a) the most recent round of financing, b) the most recent 409A valuation provided by the underlying companies of the warrants, or c) the Manager’s estimate of the company valuations based on all available information, including company financials, company valuation reports, public press releases, and other sources.CONTENTS

Investments in Securities: The estimated values for Investments in Securities have been based on the estimated net book value as of the valuation date (with impairment adjustments), plus any unrealized gain on equity. The unrealized gain on equity is based on either: a) the most recent round of financing, b) the most recent 409A valuation provided by the underlying companies of the warrants, or c) the Manager’s estimate of the company valuations based on all available information, including company financials, company valuation reports, public press releases, and other sources.

Warrants Outstanding: The estimated values for Warrants Outstanding considers the reported GAAP balances to be an appropriate approximation of their fair values.

Syndication Costs: Syndication costs for the Fund have been added to the value, estimated based on 15% of gross equity raised, and are assumed to be amortized over the expected 12-year life of the Fund. The remaining unamortized portion has been added to the Fund’s balance sheet as an asset.

Accrued distributions: Accrued distributions, which are payable to the Unit holders have been removed from the balance sheet liability section because they are not a liability to a third party.

ATEL 12, LLC Unit Valuation

The Manager’s estimated per Unit value of ATEL 12, LLC at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 as determined, and derived under the guidelines of the Appraised Value Methodology, and pursuant to the above specific enumerated component valuation methodologies and calculations, equals $21.0663. An independent national public accounting firm with valuation expertise was retained to examine, attest and confirm ATEL 12, LLC’s per Unit valuation and its component methodologies and calculation as it relates to compliance with the regulatory mandate defined in the Notice. In this regard, they examined the components of the valuation methodologies and determined them to be reasonable and within industry standards. Other component attributes, including the bases and related key assumptions of the calculation were tested for their completeness, underlying documentation support and mathematical accuracy. Upon completion of their efforts, their attestation report confirmed that the per unit valuation of ATEL 12, LLC, and the related notes, in all material respects, was based upon industry practice as described in the Manager’s valuation approach.

Disclaimer

The foregoing Fund per Unit valuation has been performed solely for the purpose of providing an estimated value per Unit in accordance with a regulatory mandate, in order to provide the broker dealer and custodian community with a valuation on a reasonable and attested basis for use in assigning an estimation of a Unit holder’s account value. Any report or disclosure of such estimated per Unit valuation is to be accompanied by statements that the value does not represent an estimate of the amount a Unit holder would receive if the Unit holder were to seek to sell the Units, and that the Fund intends to liquidate its assets in the ordinary course of its business and over the Fund’s term. Further, each statement of the Fund’s estimated per Unit valuation is to be accompanied by a disclosure that there can be no assurance as to (1) when the Fund will be fully liquidated, (2) the amount the Fund may actually receive if and when the Fund seeks to liquidate its assets, (3) the amount of lease or loan payments the Fund will actually receive over the remaining term, (4) the amount of asset disposition proceeds the Fund will actually receive over the remaining term, and (5) the amounts that may actually be received in distributions by Unit holders over the course of the remaining term.

Distributions

The Unitholders of record are entitled to certain distributions as provided under the Operating Agreement. The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of February 2008. Additional distributions have been consistently made through December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

Cash distributions were paid by the Fund to Unitholders of record as of November 30, ~~2016~~2017, and paid through December 31, ~~2016~~2017. Distributions may be characterized for tax, accounting and economic purposes as a return of capital, a return on capital (including escrow interest) or a portion of each. Generally, the portion of each cash distribution by a company which exceeds its net income for the fiscal period would constitute a return of capital. The Fund is required by the terms of its Operating Agreement to distribute the net cash flow generated by its investments in certain minimum amounts during the Reinvestment Period before it can reinvest its operating cash flow in additional portfolio assets. See the discussion in the ATEL 12, LLC Prospectus dated September 26, 2007 (“Prospectus”) under “Income, Losses and Distributions — Reinvestment.” Accordingly, the amount of cash flow from Fund investments distributed to Unitholders will not be available for reinvestment in additional portfolio assets.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cash distributions were based on current and anticipated gross revenues from the leases and loans acquired. During the Fund’s acquisition and operating stages, the Fund may incur short term borrowing to fund regular distributions of such gross revenues to be generated by newly acquired transactions during their respective initial fixed terms. As such, all Fund periodic cash distributions made during these stages have been, and are expected in the future to be, based on the Fund’s actual and anticipated gross revenues to be generated from the binding initial terms of the leases and loans acquired.

The following table presents summarized information regarding distributions to other members:

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Net income per Unit, based on weighted average Units outstanding	$	0.12		$	0.26
Net (loss) income per Unit, based on weighted average Units outstanding	$	(0.02	)	$	0.12
Return of investment		0.7829			0.6478
Distributions declared per Unit, based on weighted average Other Member Units outstanding		0.9027			0.90
Differences due to timing of distributions		—			—
Actual distributions paid per Unit	$	0.9027		$	0.90

Item 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

A smaller reporting company is not required to present selected financial data in accordance with item 301(c) of Regulation S-K.

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements contained in this Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in investment and reinvestment, delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

During 2009, the Company completed its initial acquisition stage with the investment of the net proceeds from the public offering of Units. Subsequently, during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), the Company has reinvested cash flow in excess of certain

TABLE OF CONTENTS

amounts required to be distributed to the members and/or utilized its credit facilities to acquire additional equipment. Throughout the Reinvestment Period, which ended December 31, 2015, the Company reinvested cash flow in excess of minimum distributions and other obligations. The Company is governed by its Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (“Operating Agreement”), as amended.

The Company may continue until December 31, 2030. However, pursuant to the guidelines of the Operating Agreement, the Company commenced liquidation phase activities on January 1, 2016. Periodic distributions are paid at the discretion of the Managing Member.

Results of Operations

It is the Company’s objective to maintain a 100% utilization rate for all equipment purchased in any given year. All equipment transactions are acquired subject to binding lease commitments, so equipment utilization is expected to remain high during the funding period and throughout the reinvestment stage. Initial lease terms of these leases are generally from 36 to 120 months, and as they expire, the Company will attempt to re-lease or sell the equipment. All of the Company’s equipment on lease was purchased in the years 2008 through 2013. The utilization percentage of existing assets under lease was 9899% and ~~100~~98% at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member and/or affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred.

20162017 versus 20152016

The Company had net ~~income~~loss of $~~583~~192 thousand, and net income of $~~988~~583 thousand, for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. The net results for ~~2016~~2017 reflect ~~decreases~~a decrease in ~~both~~ total ~~revenues~~revenue and an increase in total operating expenses when compared to the prior year.

Revenues

Total revenues for ~~2016~~2017 ~~decreased~~declined by $~~1.2~~181 ~~million~~thousand, or 4211%, as compared to the prior year period. Such decrease was largely due to a $~~526~~349 thousand, or 2421%, reduction in operating lease revenues, mainly the result of ~~run-off and~~ dispositions of lease assets; a $~~467~~114 thousand, or ~~129~~90%, ~~unfavorable~~decrease ~~turn~~in toother ~~net~~revenue ~~loss~~related ~~from~~to ~~net~~deferred ~~gain~~maintenance offees ~~$361~~previously ~~million~~collected on ~~sales~~certain ofreturned ~~lease~~equipment ~~assets~~in ~~and~~the ~~early~~prior ~~termination~~period; ofand ~~notes~~a ~~resulting~~$15 ~~from~~thousand adecrease ~~change~~ in ~~mix~~interest ofon ~~and~~notes areceivable, ~~diminished~~offset, ~~volume~~ in ~~sale~~part, ~~activities~~by ~~in 2016;~~ a ~~58% lesser gain to~~ $62158 thousand, ~~reflected~~or as94%, ~~gains~~favorable ~~realized~~change on ~~sales~~the offair ~~securities,~~value ~~mainly~~adjustment ~~attributable~~for towarrants; a ~~lower~~$128 ~~volume~~thousand, ofor ~~sales~~121%, ~~activities~~favorable ~~during~~change ~~2016;~~on ~~and~~the again ~~78% decrease interest~~ on ~~notes receivable~~ sales of ~~$53~~lease ~~thousand~~assets ~~largely~~and ~~due~~early totermination ~~scheduled run-off~~ of ~~the~~notes ~~loan portfolio~~receivable; and ~~was partially offset by~~ a $9613 thousand, or ~~310~~21%, increase in ~~other~~gain ~~revenue,~~on ~~related~~sales toof investment in ~~deferred maintenance fees and other fees charged to certain lessees~~securities.

Expenses

Total expenses for ~~2016~~2017 ~~decreased~~increased by $~~760~~594 thousand, or 4358%, as compared to the prior year period. ~~The~~Such ~~decrease~~increase in ~~total~~ expenses was ~~largely~~primarily athe result of a $~~644~~281 thousand increase in impairment losses recognized on equipment; a $219 thousand increase in impairment losses on investment in securities during the current year period; a $37 thousand, or 5488%, ~~reduction~~increase in ~~depreciation~~outside ~~expense~~services, ~~mostly~~indicative ~~the~~of ~~result~~additional ofefforts ~~run-off~~required ~~and~~to ~~sales~~comply ofwith ~~lease~~certain ~~assets~~regulatory requirements; a $6032 thousand increase in an adjustment for provision for credit losses, due to increased delinquent accounts; a $20 thousand or 2716%, ~~decline~~increase in ~~cost~~professional fees ~~reimbursements~~related to ~~the~~a ~~Manager~~year ~~and/or~~over ~~affiliates,~~year ~~directly~~difference ~~attributable~~in totiming aand ~~reduced~~related ~~level~~billings offor ~~fund~~professional ~~assets~~audit ~~under~~and ~~management~~tax services; aan $3718 thousand, or 583%, ~~decrease~~increase in ~~franchise~~depreciation ~~fees~~expense, mainly the result of a lease contract renewal and ~~taxes~~a reduction in residual value on certain equipment; offset in part, ~~which~~by ~~can~~an be$11 ~~attributed~~thousand, toor ~~both~~23%, adecrease ~~diminishing~~in ~~tax~~asset ~~base~~management ~~and~~fees to the ~~timing~~managing ofmember, ~~tax~~related ~~payments~~ to ~~various~~lower ~~jurisdictions~~revenue from leases.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $~~1.0~~479 ~~million~~thousand and $21.30 million, respectively. The liquidity of the Company varies, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as lease assets are acquired, as distributions are made to the Members and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

The Company currently believes it has adequate reserves available to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Company would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. The Managing Member envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth summary cash flow data (in thousands):

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	~~1,424~~812		$	1,~~786~~424
Investing activities		~~635~~230			~~2,061~~635
Financing activities		(31,~~366~~596	)		(3,~~784~~366	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(1,307	)	$	63
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(554	)	$	(1,307	)

20162017 versus 20152016

During ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the Company’s primary sources of liquidity were cash flows from its portfolio of operating and direct financing lease contracts, and its investments in notes receivable. In addition, the Company realized $~~220~~229 thousand and $~~1.5~~319 ~~million~~thousand of proceeds from sales or dispositions of investment in securities and sales of lease assets and/or the early termination of notes receivable, in ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 respectively. Principal payments received on notes receivable were $~~309~~0 ~~thousand~~ and $~~401~~309 thousand for the years ended ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

During the same comparative years, cash was primarily used to pay distributions and repay debt. Distributions paid to both other members and the Managing Member totaled $21.91 million and $2.9 million for ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively; while cash used to repay non-recourse debt totaled $~~455~~463 thousand and $~~873~~455 thousand, respectively.

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the Company had non-recourse long-term debt totaling $~~566~~103 thousand and $~~1.0~~566 ~~million~~thousand, respectively. Such non-recourse notes payable do not contain any material financial covenants. The notes are secured by a specific lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items.

For detailed information on the Company’s debt obligations, see Note 87 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Distributions

The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of February 2008. Additional distributions have been consistently made through December 31, ~~2016~~2017. See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities, for additional information regarding the distributions.

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets and fund investments in notes receivable.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements attached hereto at pages 11 through 3230.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The ~~Members~~MembersATEL ~~ATEL~~ 12, LLC

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company”) as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, ~~and~~ the related statements of ~~income~~operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). ~~These~~In our opinion, the financial statements ~~are~~present fairly, in all material respects, the ~~responsibility~~financial position of the ~~Management~~Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the ~~Company’s~~results ~~Managing~~of ~~Member.~~its ~~Our~~operations ~~responsibility~~and isits tocash ~~express~~flows anfor ~~opinion~~the onyears ~~these~~then ~~financial~~ended, ~~statements~~in ~~based~~conformity onwith ~~our~~accounting ~~audits~~principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

WeBasis conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Opinion

InThese ~~our~~financial ~~opinion,~~statements are the ~~financial~~responsibility ~~statements~~of ~~referred~~the toManagement ~~above~~of ~~present~~the ~~fairly,~~Company’s inManaging ~~all~~Member. ~~material~~Our ~~respects,~~responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial ~~position~~statements ofbased ~~ATEL~~on ~~12,~~our ~~LLC~~audits. asWe ofare ~~December~~a ~~31,~~public ~~2016~~accounting ~~and~~firm ~~2015,~~registered ~~and~~with the ~~results~~Public ofCompany ~~its~~Accounting ~~operations~~Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and ~~its~~are ~~cash~~required ~~flows~~to ~~for~~be ~~the~~independent ~~years~~with ~~then~~respect ~~ended,~~to the Company in ~~conformity~~accordance with ~~accounting~~the ~~principles~~U.S. ~~generally~~federal ~~accepted~~securities inlaws and the ~~United~~applicable ~~States~~rules and regulations of ~~America.~~the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

/We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s/ ~~Moss~~internal ~~Adams~~control ~~LLP~~over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

~~San~~Our ~~Francisco~~audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, ~~California~~whether ~~March~~due 17to error or fraud, ~~2017~~and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

11/s/ Moss Adams LLP

~~ATEL~~San 12Francisco, ~~LLC~~CaliforniaMarch ~~BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31~~26, ~~2016 AND 2015(In Thousands)~~2018

	2016		2015
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,033	$	2,340
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 at December 31, 2016 and $3 at December 31, 2015		78		41
Notes receivable, net of unearned interest income of $15 as of December 31, 2015		—		309
Investment in securities		272		300
Warrants, fair value		159		327
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $8,230 at December 31, 2016 and $8,753 at December 31, 2015		2,885		3,780
Prepaid expenses and other assets		26		26
Total assets	$	4,453	$	7,123
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Managing Member	$	70	$	21
Accrued distributions to Other Members		230		230
Other		266		184
Non-recourse debt		566		1,021
Unearned operating lease income		22		40
Total liabilities		1,154		1,496
Commitments and contingencies
Members’ capital:
Managing Member		—		—
Other Members		3,299		5,627
Total Members’ capital		3,299		5,627
Total liabilities and Members’ capital	$	4,453	$	7,123

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

~~See accompanying notes.~~ 11

12TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTSBALANCE OFSHEETS INCOMEDECEMBER FOR31, THE2017 YEARSAND ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Revenues:
ASSETS
Leasing and lending activities:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	479		$	1,033
Operating leases	$	1,677		$	2,203
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $37 at December 31, 2017 and $4 at December 31, 2016		42			78
Direct financing leases		2			30
Investment in securities		27			272
Interest on notes receivable		15			68
Warrants, fair value		149			159
(Loss) gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		(106	)		361
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $8,417 at December 31, 2017 and $8,230 at December 31, 2016		1,924			2,885
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		62			147
Due from Managing Member		10			—
Unrealized loss on fair value adjustment for warrants		(168	)		(66	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		25			26
Other		127			31
Total assets	$	2,656		$	4,453
Total revenues		1,609			2,774
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Expenses:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		552			1,196
Managing Member	$	—		$	70
Asset management fees to Managing Member		48			69
Affiliates		36			—
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates		160			220
Accrued distributions to Other Members		—			230
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		1			(12	)
Other		257			266
Amortization of initial direct costs		1			9
Non-recourse debt		103			566
Provision for losses on investment securities		—			6
Unearned operating lease income		37			22
Interest expense		17			30
Total liabilities		433			1,154
Professional fees		125			110
Commitments and contingencies
Outside services		42			33
Members’ capital:
Taxes on income and franchise fees		27			64
Managing Member		—			—
Other		53			61
Other Members		2,223			3,299
Total expenses		1,026			1,786
Total Members’ capital		2,223			3,299
Net income	$	583		$	988
Total liabilities and Members’ capital	$	2,656		$	4,453
Net income:
Managing Member	$	218		$	218
Other Members		365			770
	$	583		$	988
Net income per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	$	0.12		$	0.26
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482			2,992,482

See accompanying notes.

1312

~~ATEL~~TABLE ~~12, LLC STATEMENTS~~ OF ~~CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)~~CONTENTS

	Other Members					ManagingMember			Total
	Units		Amount
Balance December 31, 2014		2,992,482	$	7,551		$	—		$	7,551
Distributions to Other Members ($0.90 per Unit)		—		(2,694	)		—			(2,694	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—		—			(218	)		(218	)
Net income		—		770			218			988
Balance December 31, 2015		2,992,482		5,627			—			5,627
Distributions to Other Members ($0.90 per Unit)		—		(2,693	)		—			(2,693	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—		—			(218	)		(218	)
Net income		—		365			218			583
Balance December 31, 2016		2,992,482	$	3,299		$	—		$	3,299

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

See accompanying notes.


	2017			2016
Revenues:
Leasing and lending activities:
Operating leases	$	1,328		$	1,677
Direct financing leases		—			2
Interest on notes receivable		—			15
Gain (loss) on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		22			(106	)
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		75			62
Unrealized loss on fair value adjustment for warrants		(10	)		(168	)
Other		13			127
Total revenues		1,428			1,609
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		570			552
Asset management fees to Managing Member		37			48
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates		169			160
Provision for credit losses		33			1
Impairment losses on equipment		281			—
Impairment losses on investment in securities		219			—
Amortization of initial direct costs		1			1
Interest expense		7			17
Professional fees		145			125
Outside services		79			42
Taxes on income and franchise fees		38			27
Printing and photocopying		16			15
Other		25			38
Total expenses		1,620			1,026
Net (loss) income	$	(192	)	$	583
Net income (loss):
Managing Member	$	66		$	218
Other Members		(258	)		365
	$	(192	)	$	583
Net (loss) income per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.12
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482			2,992,482

14See accompanying notes.

~~ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015(In Thousands)~~13

	2016			2015
Operating activities:
Net income	$	583		$	988
Adjustment to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Loss (gain) on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		106			(361	)
Depreciation of operating lease assets		552			1,196
Amortization of initial direct costs		1			9
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		1			(12	)
Provision for losses on investment in securities		—			6
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		(62	)		(147	)
Unrealized loss on fair value adjustment for warrants		168			66
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(38	)		155
Prepaid expenses and other assets		—			3
Accounts payable, Managing Member		49			25
Accounts payable, other		82			(92	)
Unearned operating lease income		(18	)		(50	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,424			1,786
Investing activities:
Purchase of securities		(9	)		(14	)
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes		220			1,472
Proceeds from sales or dispositions of investment in securities		99			113
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		16			89
Principal payments received on notes receivable		309			401
Net cash provided by investing activities		635			2,061
Financing activities:
Repayments under non-recourse debt		(455	)		(873	)
Distributions to Other Members		(2,693	)		(2,693	)
Distributions to Managing Member		(218	)		(218	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(3,366	)		(3,784	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,307	)		63
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		2,340			2,277
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	1,033		$	2,340
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	17		$	30
Cash paid during the year for taxes	$	35		$	40
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Distributions payable to Other Members at year-end	$	230		$	230
Distributions payable to Managing Member at year-end	$	19		$	19
Securities acquired through net exercise of warrants	$	—		$	34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SeeATEL accompanying12, notes.LLC STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 (In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)


			Amount
	Units		Other Members			Managing Member			Total
Balance December 31, 2015		2,992,482	$	5,627		$	—		$	5,627
Distributions to Other Members ($0.90 per Unit)		—		(2,693	)		—			(2,693	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—		—			(218	)		(218	)
Net income		—		365			218			583
Balance December 31, 2016		2,992,482		3,299			—			3,299
Distributions to Other Members ($0.27 per Unit)		—		(818	)		—			(818	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—		—			(66	)		(66	)
Net (loss) income		—		(258	)		66			(192	)
Balance December 31, 2017		2,992,482	$	2,223		$	—		$	2,223

See accompanying notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
(In Thousands)


	2017			2016
Operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(192	)	$	583
Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:
(Gain) loss on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		(22	)		106
Depreciation of operating lease assets		570			552
Amortization of initial direct costs		1			1
Provision for credit losses		33			1
Provision for losses on investment in securities		219			—
Impairment losses on equipment		281			—
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		(75	)		(62	)
Unrealized loss on fair value adjustment for warrants		10			168
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		3			(38	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1			—
Accounts payable, Managing Member		(61	)		49
Accounts payable, other		(7	)		82
Accrued liabilities, affiliates		36			—
Unearned operating lease income		15			(18	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		812			1,424
Investing activities:
Purchase of investment in securities		—			(9	)
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		130			220
Proceeds from sales or dispositions of investment in securities		99			99
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		1			16
Principal payments received on notes receivable		—			309
Net cash provided by investing activities		230			635
Financing activities:
Repayments under non-recourse debt		(463	)		(455	)
Distributions to Other Members		(1,048	)		(2,693	)
Distributions to Managing Member		(85	)		(218	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,596	)		(3,366	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(554	)		(1,307	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		1,033			2,340
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	479		$	1,033
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	7		$	17
Cash paid during the year for taxes	$	29		$	35
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Distributions payable to Other Members at year-end	$	—		$	230
Distributions payable to Managing Member at year-end	$	—		$	19

See accompanying notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on January 25, 2007 (“Date of Inception”) for the purpose of equipment financing and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. From its inception into the third quarter of 2013, the Managing Member was ATEL Associates 12, (“AA12”), a Nevada limited liability company. Effective September 30, 2013, AA12 was merged into ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS” or “Managing Member” or “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group. The Fund may continue until December 31, 2030. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member.

The Company’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unitholders, with any balance remaining after required minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional investments during the Reinvestment Period (ending six calendar years after the completion of the Company’s public offering of Units) and (iii) provide additional cash distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all investment portfolio assets has been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by the ATEL 12, LLC amended and restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement dated April 3, 2007 (the “Operating Agreement”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, the Managing Member and/or its affiliates receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 76, Related party transactions). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of the Managing Member.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, and the related statements of ~~income~~operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain prior year amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results from operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after December 31, ~~2016~~2017, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require additional disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements, and adjustments thereto.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasury instruments with original and/or purchased maturities of ninety days or less.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and for determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for credit losses on notes receivable.

Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company. Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based on historical charge off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Credit risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents, operating and direct financing lease receivables, notes receivable and accounts receivable. The Company places the majority of its cash deposits in noninterest-bearing accounts with financial institutions that have no less than $10 billion in assets. Such deposits are insured up to $250 thousand. The remainder of the Funds’ cash is temporarily invested in U.S. Treasury denominated instruments. The concentration of such deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Company. Accounts and notes receivable represent amounts due from lessees or borrowers in various industries, related to equipment on operating and direct financing leases or notes receivable.

Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. The Company depreciates all lease assets, in accordance with guidelines consistent with ASC 840-20-35-3, over the periods of the lease terms contained in each asset’s respective lease contract to the estimated residual value at the end of the lease contract. All lease assets were purchased only concurrent with the execution of a lease commitment by the lessee. Thus, the original depreciation period corresponds with the term of the original lease. Once the term of an original lease contract is completed, the subject property is typically sold to the existing user, re-leased to the existing user, or, when off-lease, is held for sale. Assets which are re-leased continue to be depreciated using the terms of the new lease agreements and the estimated residual values at the end of the new lease terms, adjusted downward as necessary. Assets classified as held-for-sale are carried at the lower of carrying amount, or the fair value less cost to sell ~~(ASC 360-10-35-43)~~.

The Company does not use the equipment held in its portfolio, but holds it solely for lease and ultimate sale. In the course of marketing equipment that has come off-lease, management may determine at some point that re-leasing the assets may provide a superior return for investors and would then execute another lease. Upon entering into a new lease contract, management will estimate the residual value once again and resume depreciation. If, and when, the Company, at any time, determines that depreciation in value may have occurred with respect to an asset held-for-sale, the Company would review the value to determine whether a material reduction in value had occurred and recognize

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

any appropriate impairment. All lease assets, including off-lease assets, are subject to the Company’s quarterly impairment analysis, as described below. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.

Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms will vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms to be negotiated, but initial leases are generally on terms from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet.

Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.

Income from direct financing lease transactions is reported using the financing method of accounting, in which the Company’s investment in the leased property is reported as a receivable from the lessee to be recovered through future rentals. The interest income portion of each rental payment is calculated so as to generate a constant rate of return on the net receivable outstanding.

Allowances for losses on direct financing leases are typically established based on historical charge-off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified lessees and billed and unbilled receivables. Direct financing leases are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

Direct financing leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) and deemed impaired when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of all direct finance lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related direct financing leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, all payments received are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

The Company records all future payments of principal and interest on notes as notes receivable, which are then offset by the amount of any related unearned interest income. For financial statement purposes, the Company reports only the net amount of principal due on the balance sheet. The unearned interest is recognized over the term of the note and the income portion of each note payment is calculated so as to generate a constant rate of return on the net balance outstanding. Any fees or costs related to notes receivable are recorded as part of the net investment in notes receivable and amortized over the term of the loan.

Allowances for losses on notes receivable are typically established based on historical charge off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified borrowers and billed and unbilled receivables. Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Notes receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related notes may be placed on non-accrual status. Notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, all payments received are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Initial direct costs:

The Company capitalizes initial direct costs (“IDC”) associated with the origination and funding of lease assets and investments in notes receivable. IDC includes both internal costs (e.g., the costs of employees’ activities in connection with successful lease and loan originations) and external broker fees incurred with such originations. The costs are amortized on a lease by lease (or note by note) basis based on actual lease term using a straight-line method for operating leases and the effective interest rate method for direct financing leases and notes receivable. Upon disposal of the underlying lease assets and notes receivable, both the initial direct costs and the associated accumulated amortization are relieved. Costs related to leases or notes receivable that are not consummated are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs and are expensed as acquisition expense.

Acquisition expense:

Acquisition expense represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses and miscellaneous expenses related to the selection and acquisition of equipment which are reimbursable to the Managing Member under the terms of the Operating Agreement. As the costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred.

Asset valuation:

Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the ~~company~~Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than ~~their~~the net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments ~~recognized~~ recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances.

Segment reporting:

The Company is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The Company’s principal decision makers are the Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Company believes that its equipment leasing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Company measures profit and loss at the equipment portfolio level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

leasing transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment lease financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas.

The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks leasing opportunities is North America. As of and for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, all of the Company’s current operating revenues and long-lived assets relate to customers domiciled in the United States.

Investment in securities:

From time to time, the Company may purchase securities of its borrowers or receive warrants to purchase securities in connection with its lending arrangements.

Purchased securities

Purchased securities are generally not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. Such securities are adjusted to fair value if the fair value is less than the carrying value and such impairment is deemed by the Managing Member to be other than temporary. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. The Company had $~~272~~27 thousand and $~~300~~272 thousand of purchased securities at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. Based upon the Company’s review of its portfolio, nothe Company recorded fair value ~~adjustment~~adjustments ~~was~~on ~~deemed~~investment ~~necessary~~in ~~for~~securities totaling $219 thousand and $0 during 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognized gains of $75 thousand and ~~2015~~$62 thousand on sales of investment in securities during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Warrants

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are reflected at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet as determined by the Managing Member. The Company recorded unrealized losses of $~~168~~10 thousand and $66168 thousand on fair value adjustment of its warrants during ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. The unrealized losses recorded during ~~2016~~2017 reduced the estimated fair value of the Company’s portfolio of warrants to $~~159~~149 thousand at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 from $~~327~~159 thousand at December 31, ~~2015~~2016. The Company realized no gains orof ~~losses~~$2 ~~from~~thousand on the net exercise of certain warrants ~~during~~in ~~2016~~2017. The Company realized no gains ofor ~~$147~~losses ~~thousand~~from on the net exercise of ~~certain~~ warrants induring ~~2015~~2016.

Unearned operating lease income:

The Company records prepayments on operating leases as a liability under the caption of unearned operating lease income. The liability is recorded when prepayments are received and recognized as operating lease revenue over the period to which the prepayments relate using a straight-line method.

Income Taxes:

The Company is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 701 of the Internal Revenue Code, a partnership is not subject to federal income taxes. Accordingly, the Company has provided current franchise income taxes for only those states which levy income taxes on partnerships. For the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the related provision for state income taxes was approximately $2738 thousand and $6427 thousand, respectively. The Company does not have any entity level uncertain tax positions. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions and is generally subject to examination by U.S. federal (or state and local) income tax authorities for three years from the filing of a tax return.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

The tax bases of the Company’s net assets and liabilities vary from the amounts presented in these financial statements at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 as follows (in thousands):

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Financial statement basis of net assets	$	32,~~299~~223		$	53,~~627~~299
Tax basis of net assets (unaudited)		5,~~854~~672			75,~~728~~854
Difference (unaudited)	$	(23,~~555~~449	)	$	(2,~~101~~555	)

The primary differences between the tax bases of net assets and the amounts recorded in the financial statements are the result of differences in accounting for syndication costs and differences between the depreciation methods used in the financial statements and the Company’s tax returns.

The following reconciles the net (loss) income reported in these financial statements to the income reported on the Company’s federal tax return (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):

	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Net income per financial statements	$	583		$	988
Net (loss) income per financial statements	$	(192	)	$	583
Tax adjustments (unaudited):
Adjustment to depreciation expense		(6466	)		~~175~~(6	)
Provision for losses and doubtful accounts		133			~~(12~~1	)
Adjustments to revenues/other expenses		6826			3568
Adjustments to gain on sales of assets		~~297~~105			~~797~~297
Other		(3300	)		82(3	)
Gain per federal tax return (unaudited)	$	940		$	2,065
Income per federal tax return (unaudited)	$	738		$	940

Per Unit data:

Net income and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding during the year.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-15 — Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 addresses specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~Early~~This ~~adoption~~guidance is ~~permitted~~effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. ~~Management~~The isadoption ~~currently~~of ~~evaluating~~ASU ~~the~~2016-15 ~~standard~~did ~~and~~not ~~its~~have a material impact on ~~operations~~its ~~and~~ financial ~~reporting~~statements and disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). The main objective of this Update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this Update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments affect entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the standard and ~~its~~expects ~~operational~~the ~~and~~Update ~~related~~may ~~disclosure~~potentially ~~requirements.~~result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses given the change to estimated losses over the contractual life adjusted for expected prepayments.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard will require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases with lease ~~terms greater than 12 months in the statement of financial position. Lessor accounting per ASU 2016-02 is mostly~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

terms greater than 12 months in the statement of financial position. Lessor accounting per ASU 2016-02 is mostly unchanged from the previous lease accounting under GAAP. Certain changes were made to the lessor accounting guidance in order to align the lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Similar to the previous guidance, lessors will classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type. Lessors in operating leases will continue to recognize the underlying asset and recognize income on a straight-line basis. Lessors determine whether a lease is a sale of the underlying asset based on whether the lessee effectively obtains control of the underlying assets. ASU- 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~Early~~While early adoption is permitted., ~~Management~~the ~~will~~Company ~~adopt~~does ~~the~~not ~~standard~~expect ~~and~~to iselect ~~currently~~that ~~evaluating~~option. The Company expects to adopt the ~~standard~~guidance ~~and~~in ~~its~~the ~~operational~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~related~~2019 ~~disclosure~~using ~~requirements~~the modified retrospective method.

InManagement ~~January~~is ~~2016,~~currently evaluating the ~~FASB~~impact ~~issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement~~ of ~~Financial~~this ~~Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). The new~~ standard ~~provides~~on ~~guidance~~the ~~related to accounting for equity investments and~~ financial ~~liabilities~~statements ~~under the fair value option,~~ and ~~the~~its ~~presentation~~operational and related disclosure requirements ~~for financial instruments. In addition~~, including the ~~FASB~~impact ~~clarified~~on ~~guidance related to~~ the ~~valuation~~Company’s ~~allowance~~current ~~assessment~~lease ~~when~~portfolio ~~recognizing deferred tax assets resulting~~ from ~~unrealized~~a ~~losses~~lessor ~~on available-for-sale debt securities~~perspective. ~~ASU~~Given ~~2016-01~~the islimited ~~effective~~changes ~~for~~to ~~fiscal~~lessor ~~years beginning after December 15~~accounting, ~~2017,~~Management ~~including~~does ~~interim~~not ~~periods~~expect ~~within~~material ~~those~~changes ~~fiscal~~to ~~years.~~recognition ~~Management~~or ~~will~~measurement, ~~adopt~~but the ~~standard~~Company ~~and~~ is ~~currently~~early ~~evaluating~~in the ~~standard~~implementation process and ~~its~~will ~~operational~~continue ~~and~~to ~~related~~evaluate ~~disclosure~~the ~~requirements~~impact.

In ~~August~~January ~~2014~~2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ~~2014~~2016-1501, ~~Presentation of~~ Financial ~~Statements~~Instruments — ~~Going~~ Overall ~~Concern~~ (Subtopic ~~205~~825-4010): ~~Disclosure~~Recognition ofand ~~Uncertainties~~Measurement ~~about~~of anFinancial ~~Entity’s~~Assets ~~Ability~~and toFinancial ~~Continue~~Liabilities ~~as a Going Concern~~ (“ASU 2016-~~2014-15~~01”). The new standard provides guidance ~~relative~~related to ~~management’~~accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01, among other things, (i) requires equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (ii) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment, (iii) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) ~~responsibility~~and significant assumptions used to ~~evaluate~~estimate ~~whether~~the ~~there~~fair value that is ~~substantial~~required ~~doubt~~to ~~about~~be andisclosed ~~entity’s~~for ~~ability~~financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (iv) requires public business entities to ~~continue~~use asthe aexit ~~going~~price ~~concern~~notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, and to(v) ~~provide~~requires ~~related~~separate ~~footnote~~presentation ~~disclosures.~~of ~~The~~financial ~~new~~assets ~~standard~~and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~and~~2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years,. ~~beginning~~This ~~after~~guidance ~~December~~is ~~15, 2016.~~effective ~~Early~~for ~~adoption~~the isCompany ~~permitted.~~beginning ~~Management~~on ~~does~~January ~~not~~1, ~~expect~~2018. ~~the~~The adoption of ASU ~~2014~~2016-1501 todid not have a material impact on ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~ financial statements orand ~~related~~ disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and in August 2015, issued Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. ~~The~~This ~~Company~~guidance ~~evaluated~~is effective for the ~~impact~~Company beginning on January 1, 2018. Management’s evaluation of the ~~new~~impact ~~standard~~of such adoption on ~~its~~the financial statements ~~and~~of ~~has~~the ~~determined~~Fund indicates that such impact is ~~virtually~~ non-~~existent~~material as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. Concentration of credit risk and major customers:

The Company leases equipment to lessees and provides debt financing to borrowers in diversified industries. Leases and notes receivable are subject to the Managing Member’s credit committee review. The leases and notes receivable provide for the return of the equipment to the Company upon default.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, there were concentrations (greater than or equal to 10% as a percentage of total equipment cost) of equipment leased to lessees and/or financed for borrowers in certain industries as follows:

Industry	~~2016~~2017			~~2015~~2016
Retail		19	%		23	%
Air transportation		23	%		19	%
Air transportation		19	%		17	%
Retail		22	%		19	%
Food products		1418	%		1314	%
Gas/Coal		1417	%		1214	%
Business services		10*	%		*10	%

Less than 10%

22During 2017 and 2016, certain lessees and/or financial borrowers generated significant portions (defined as greater than or equal to 10%) of the Company’s total leasing and lending revenues, excluding gains or losses on disposition of assets, as follows:


			Percentage of Total Leasing and Lending Revenues
Lessee	Type of Equipment		2017			2016
Aircraft Service International, Inc.		Aviation		25	%		20	%
Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC		Transportation		21	%		17	%
Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc.		Transportation		15	%		12	%
IBM Corporation		Research		*			13	%

Less than 10%

These percentages are not expected to be comparable in future periods due to anticipated changes in the mix of investments and/or lessees as a result of normal business activities.

4. Investments in equipment and leases, net:


	Balance December 31, 2016		Reclassifications, Additions/ Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance December 31, 2017
Net investment in operating leases	$	2,583	$	(361	)	$	(570	)	$	1,652
Net investment in direct financing leases		1		—			(1	)		—
Assets held for sale or lease, net		300		(28	)		—			272
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3 at December 31, 2017 and $4 at December 31, 2016		1		—			(1	)		—
Total	$	2,885	$	(389	)	$	(572	)	$	1,924

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

34. ConcentrationInvestments ofin creditequipment risk and majorleases, customersnet: - (continued)

DuringImpairment 2016 and 2015, certain lessees and/or financial borrowers generated significant portions (defined as greater than or equal to 10%) of theinvestments Company’sin total leasing and lending revenues, excluding gains or losses on disposition of assets, as followsleases:

Lessee	Type of Equipment		Percentage of Total Leasing and Lending Revenues
			2016			2015
Aircraft Service International, Inc.		Aviation		20	%		15	%
Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC		Transportation		17	%		17	%
IBM Corporation		Research		13	%		*
Nomac Drilling, LLC		Mining		12	%		*

The Company recorded $281 thousand and $0 of fair value adjustments for impairment losses on its investments in equipment and leases during 2017 and 2016, respectively.

*Recorded ~~Less~~values ~~than~~of ~~10%~~the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place.

~~These~~The ~~percentages~~Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are ~~not~~appropriate. ~~expected~~In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to becontinue ~~comparable~~to inmake payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future ~~periods~~cash ~~due~~flows toof ~~anticipated~~the ~~changes~~asset inare less than the ~~mix~~net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of ~~investments~~the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and/ undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or ~~lessees~~to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances. As a result of ~~normal~~these ~~business~~reviews, ~~activities~~management determined that a $281 thousand impairment loss on equipment was deemed necessary for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded no fair value adjustments for impairment losses on its investments in equipment and leases during 2016.

4The Company utilizes a straight line depreciation method over the term of the equipment lease for equipment on operating leases currently in its portfolio. ~~Notes~~Depreciation ~~receivable~~expense on the Company’s equipment totaled $570 thousand and $552 thousand for the years ended December 31, ~~net:~~2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~The~~All ~~Company had various notes receivable from borrowers who had financed the purchase~~ of ~~equipment through~~ the Company.’s Aslease ofasset ~~December~~purchases ~~31,~~and ~~2016,~~capital ~~the~~improvements ~~Company~~were ~~had~~made noduring ~~notes receivable. As of December 31, 2015,~~ the ~~original~~years ~~terms of the notes were~~ from 362008 tothrough ~~42 months with interest at rates ranging from 11~~2013.~~88%~~ ~~to 14.30% per annum. The notes were secured by the equipment financed and had matured in 2016.~~

TheOperating Company had neither notes in non-accrued status nor impaired notes at both December 31, 2016 and 2015.leases:

~~IDC~~Property ~~amortization~~on ~~expense related to notes receivable and the Company’s~~ operating ~~and direct finance~~ leases ~~for~~consists of the ~~years~~following ~~ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows~~ (in thousands):

	2016			2015
	Balance December 31, 2016			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance December 31, 2017
IDC amortization – notes receivable	$	—		$	3
Transportation	$	3,963		$	—		$	—		$	3,963
IDC amortization – lease assets		1			6
Construction		2,740			—			1			2,741
Total	$	1		$	9
Aviation		2,167			—			(90	)		2,077
Materials handling		254			—			(196	)		58
Computer		87			—			(41	)		46
Manufacturing		664			—			(664	)		—
Other		1			—			(1	)		—
		9,876			—			(991	)		8,885
Less accumulated depreciation		(7,293	)		(570	)		630			(7,233	)
Total	$	2,583		$	(570	)	$	(361	)	$	1,652

5.The ~~Investments~~average inestimated ~~equipment~~residual value for assets on operating leases was 19% and 22% of the assets’ original cost at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. There were no operating leases in non-accrual status at both December 31, ~~net:~~2017 and 2016.

~~The Company’s investment in leases consists of the following (in thousands):~~ 24

	Balance December 31, 2015		Reclassifications, Additions/ Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance December 31, 2016
Net investment in operating leases	$	3,499	$	(364	)	$	(552	)	$	2,583
Net investment in direct financing leases		17		—			(16	)		1
Assets held for sale or lease, net		262		38			—			300
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4 at December 31, 2016 and $3 at December 31, 2015		2		—			(1	)		1
Total	$	3,780	$	(326	)	$	(569	)	$	2,885

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Impairment of investments in leases:

The Company recorded no fair value adjustments for impairment losses on its investments in equipment and leases during 2016 and 2015.

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

54. Investments in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

TheDirect Companyfinancing utilizes a straight line depreciation method over the term of the equipment lease for equipment on operating leases currently in its portfolio. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment totaled $552 thousand and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. :

~~All~~As of ~~the~~December ~~Company’s~~31, ~~lease~~2016, ~~asset~~investment ~~purchases~~in ~~and~~direct ~~capital~~financing ~~improvements~~leases ~~were~~consisted ~~made~~of ~~during~~various ~~the~~types ~~years~~of ~~from~~materials ~~2008~~handling ~~through 2013~~equipment.

~~Operating~~The components of the Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):


	2016
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	1
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		—
Investment in direct financing leases		1
Less unearned income		—
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	1

	Balance December 31, 2015			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance December 31, 2016
Transportation	$	4,866		$	—		$	(903	)	$	3,963
Construction		2,740			—			—			2,740
Aviation		2,167			—			—			2,167
Materials handling		916			—			(662	)		254
Manufacturing		664			—			—			664
Computer		87			—			—			87
Other		1			—			—			1
		11,441			—			(1,565	)		9,876
Less accumulated depreciation		(7,942	)		(552	)		1,201			(7,293	)
Total	$	3,499		$	(552	)	$	(364	)	$	2,583

As of December 31, 2016, there were no investments in direct financing leases in non-accrual status.

~~The~~At ~~average~~December ~~estimated~~31, ~~residual~~2017, ~~value~~the ~~for~~aggregate ~~assets~~amounts ~~on operating leases was 22% and 24%~~ of ~~the~~future ~~assets’~~minimum ~~original~~operating ~~cost~~lease atpayments ~~December~~receivable ~~31,~~are ~~2016~~$313 ~~and 2015~~thousand, ~~respectively.~~all ~~There~~of ~~were~~which noare ~~operating~~due ~~leases~~and inreceivable ~~non-accrual~~during ~~status at both December 31, 2016 and 2015~~2018.

~~Direct~~The ~~financing~~useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, investment in direct financing leases consists of various types of materials handling equipment.


Equipment category	Useful Life
Aviation		15 – 20
Manufacturing		10 – 15
Construction		7 – 10
Materials handling		7 – 10
Transportation		7 – 10
Computer		3 – 5

The5. componentsAllowance offor thecredit Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands)losses:

	2016		2015
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	1	$	18
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		—		1
Investment in direct financing leases		1		19
Less unearned income		—		(2	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	1	$	17

The Company's allowance for credit losses totaled $37 thousand and $4 thousand at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. All of such allowance were related to delinquent operating lease receivables.

24The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments.

Each of AFS and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group, Inc. and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member or its affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Managing Member believes that the costs reimbursed are the lower of (i) actual costs incurred on behalf of the Company or (ii) the amount the Company would be required to pay independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AtThe ~~December~~Managing ~~31,~~Member ~~2016~~and/or affiliates earned fees and billed for reimbursements, pursuant to the ~~aggregate~~Operating ~~amounts~~Agreement, ofduring ~~future~~the ~~minimum~~years ~~lease~~ended ~~payments~~December ~~receivable~~31, ~~are~~2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases		Total
	2017		2016
Year ending December 31, 2017	$	818	$	1	$	819
Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	169	$	160
2018		311		—		311
Asset management fees to Managing Member		37		48
	$	~~1,129~~206	$	1208	$	~~1,130~~

The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter7. AsNon-recourse of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years)debt:

Equipment category	Useful Life
Aviation		15 – 20
Manufacturing		10 – 15
Construction		7 – 10
Materials handling		7 – 10
Transportation		7 – 10
Computer		3 – 5

At December 31, 2017, non-recourse debt consists of notes payable to financial institutions. The notes are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes is at fixed rates ranging from 1.97% to 2.39% per annum. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At December 31, 2017, gross operating lease rentals totaled approximately $109 thousand over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $657 thousand. The notes mature at various dates in 2018.

6The non-recourse debt does not contain any material financial covenants. ~~Allowance~~The ~~for~~debt ~~credit~~is ~~losses~~secured by a specific lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lender on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lender has recourse only to the following collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items. The non-recourse obligation is payable solely out of the respective specific security and the Company does not guarantee (nor is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted, the Company is directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to the lender, such as warranties as to genuineness of the transaction parties’ signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company’s good title to or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and are viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly, as there are no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company in connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure.

The ~~Company’s~~remaining ~~allowance~~future ~~for~~minimum ~~credit~~payments ~~losses~~of non-recourse debt total $104 thousand, all of which are asdue ~~follows~~and ~~(in~~payable ~~thousands):~~during 2018. The payments are comprised of principal payments totaling $103 thousand and interest payments totaling $1 thousand.

	Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts								Total Allowance for Credit Losses
	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases			Operating Leases
Balance December 31, 2014	$	—	$	1		$	14		$	15
Reversal of provision for credit losses		—		(1	)		(11	)		(12	)
Balance December 31, 2015		—		—			3			3
Provision for credit losses		—		—			1			1
Balance December 31, 2016	$	—	$	—		$	4		$	4

8. Commitments:

25At December 31, 2017, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets and fund investments in notes receivable.

9. Guarantees:

The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The Managing Member knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Company’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Company believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Company’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Company would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

610. AllowanceMembers’ for credit lossescapital: - (continued)

AsA total of 2,992,482 Units were issued and outstanding at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, including the ~~Company~~50 ~~had~~Units noissued ~~allowance~~to ~~for~~the ~~credit~~initial ~~losses~~Member (~~related~~Managing ~~solely~~Member). toThe ~~financing~~Fund ~~receivables)~~was ~~and~~authorized ~~its~~to ~~recorded~~issue ~~investment~~up to 20,000,000 Units in ~~financing~~addition ~~receivables~~to ~~were~~the asUnits ~~follows~~issued ~~(in~~to ~~thousands):~~the initial Member.

December 31, 2016	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	—	$	1
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	1
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—

The Company has the right, exercisable at the Managing Member’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Company is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the Managing Member on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the Managing Member deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Company; provided, the Company is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs. No units were repurchased during 2017 or 2016.

December 31, 2015	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	3091	$	17
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	309	$	17
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—

The Fund’s net income or net losses are to be allocated 100% to the Members. From the commencement of the Fund until the initial closing date, net income and net loss were allocated 99% to the Managing Member and 1% to the initial members. Commencing with the initial closing date, net income and net loss are to be allocated 92.5% to the Other Members and 7.5% to the Managing Member.

1Fund ~~Includes~~distributions $1are ofto ~~unamortized~~be ~~initial~~allocated ~~direct~~7.5% ~~costs~~to the Managing Member and 92.5% to the Other Members. The Company commenced periodic distributions in December 2008.

~~The~~Distributions ~~Company~~to ~~evaluates~~ the ~~credit~~Other ~~quality~~Members offor ~~its~~the ~~financing~~years ~~receivables~~ended onDecember a31, ~~scale~~2017 ~~equivalent~~and to2016 ~~the~~were ~~following~~as ~~quality~~follows ~~indicators~~(in ~~related~~thousands toexcept ~~corporate~~Units ~~risk~~and ~~profiles~~per Unit data):

Pass — Any account whose lessee/debtor, co-lessee/debtor or any guarantor has a credit rating on publicly traded or privately placed debt issues as rated by Moody’s or S&P for either Senior Unsecured debt, Long Term Issuer rating or Issuer rating that are in the tiers of ratings generally recognized by the investment community as constituting an Investment Grade credit rating; or, has been determined by the Manager to be an Investment Grade Equivalent or High Quality Corporate Credit per its Credit Policy or has a Not Rated internal rating by the Manager and the account is not considered by the Chief Credit Officer of the manager to fall into one of the three risk profiles below.


	2017		2016
Distributions	$	818	$	2,693
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482		2,992,482
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	0.27	$	0.90

Special Mention — Any traditional corporate type account with potential weaknesses (e11.g. largeFair netvalue losses or major industry downturns) or, any growth capital account that has less than three months of cash as of the end of the calendar quarter to fund their continuing operations. These accounts deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the Fund’s receivable at some future date. measurements:

~~Substandard — Any~~Fair ~~account~~value ~~that~~measurements ~~is inadequately protected by the current worth~~ and ~~paying~~disclosures ~~capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Accounts that~~ are sobased ~~classified~~on ~~have~~ a ~~well-defined~~fair ~~weakness~~value orhierarchy ~~weaknesses~~as ~~that~~determined ~~jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized~~ by ~~the~~significant ~~distinct~~inputs ~~possibility~~used ~~that~~to ~~the~~measure ~~Fund~~fair ~~will~~value. ~~sustain~~The ~~some~~three ~~loss~~levels ~~as the likelihood~~ of ~~fully~~inputs ~~collecting~~within ~~all receivables may be questionable if~~ the ~~deficiencies~~fair ~~are~~value ~~not~~hierarchy ~~corrected. Such accounts~~ are ondefined ~~the~~as ~~Manager’s~~follows: ~~Credit Watch List.~~

~~Doubtful~~Level 1 — ~~Any~~Quoted ~~account~~prices ~~where the weaknesses make collection or liquidation~~ in ~~full,~~active onmarkets ~~the~~for ~~basis~~identical ofassets ~~currently~~or ~~existing~~liabilities. ~~facts,~~An ~~conditions,~~active ~~and~~market ~~values,~~for ~~highly~~the ~~questionable~~asset ~~and~~or ~~improbable.~~liability ~~Accordingly,~~is ana ~~account~~market ~~that~~in iswhich sotransactions ~~classified~~for ~~is on~~ the ~~Manager’s~~asset ~~Credit~~or ~~Watch~~liability ~~List,~~occur ~~and~~with ~~has~~sufficient ~~been~~frequency ~~declared in default~~ and ~~the~~volume ~~Manager~~to ~~has~~provide ~~repossessed,~~pricing orinformation ison ~~attempting~~an toongoing ~~repossess~~basis, ~~the~~generally ~~equipment~~on ita ~~financed.~~national ~~This category includes impaired notes and leases as applicable~~exchange.

AtLevel ~~December~~2 — Quoted ~~31,~~prices ~~2016~~for ~~and~~similar ~~2015~~instruments in active markets, ~~the~~quoted ~~Company’s~~prices ~~financing~~for ~~receivables~~identical byor ~~credit~~similar ~~quality~~instruments ~~indicator~~in ~~and~~markets bythat ~~class~~are ofnot ~~financing~~active, ~~receivables~~and ~~are~~model-based asvaluations ~~follows~~in ~~(excludes~~which ~~initial~~all ~~direct~~significant ~~costs)~~inputs (are observable in ~~thousands):~~the market.

	Notes Receivable				Finance Leases
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Pass	$	—	$	308	$	1	$	17
Special mention		—		—		—		—
Substandard		—		—		—		—
Doubtful		—		—		—		—
Total	$	—	$	308	$	1	$	17

Level 3 — Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

26At December 31, 2017 and 2016, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis. During 2017 and 2016, the Company had non-recurring adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain assets deemed impaired.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

611. AllowanceFair forvalue credit lossesmeasurements: - (continued)

~~There~~estimated ~~were~~using nodiscounted ~~impaired~~cash ~~loans~~flow asanalyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of ~~December~~collateral 31and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, ~~2016~~including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and ~~2015~~credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

AtSuch ~~December~~fair ~~31,~~value ~~2016~~adjustments ~~and~~utilized ~~2015,~~ the ~~investment~~following ~~in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands)~~methodology:

December 31, 2016	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment>90 Days and Accruing
Finance leases	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	1	$	—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	1	$	—

Warrants (recurring)

December 31, 2015	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment>90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	308	$	308	$	—
Finance leases		—		—		5		5		12		17		5
Total	$	—	$	—	$	5	$	5	$	320	$	325	$	5

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $149 thousand and $159 thousand, respectively. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

7.The ~~Related~~following ~~party~~table ~~transactions~~reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 recurring assets (in thousands):

The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.


	2017			2016
Fair value of warrants at beginning of year	$	159		$	327
Unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants		(10	)		(168	)
Fair value of warrants at end of year	$	149		$	159

TheImpaired Operatinginvestment Agreementsecurities allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments. (non-recurring)

~~Each~~The ofCompany’s ~~AFS~~investment ~~and~~securities ~~ATEL~~are ~~Leasing~~not ~~Corporation~~registered ~~(“ALC”)~~for ispublic asale ~~wholly-owned~~and ~~subsidiary~~are ofcarried ~~ATEL~~at ~~Capital~~cost. ~~Group,~~The ~~Inc.~~investment ~~and~~securities ~~performs~~are ~~services~~adjusted for ~~the~~impairment, ~~Company~~if onany, ~~behalf~~based ofupon ~~the~~factors ~~Managing~~which ~~Member.~~include, ~~Acquisition~~but ~~services,~~are ~~equipment~~not ~~management~~limited to, ~~lease~~available ~~administration~~financial ~~and~~information, ~~asset~~the ~~disposition~~issuer’s ~~services~~ability ~~are~~to ~~performed~~meet byits ~~ALC;~~current ~~investor~~obligations ~~relations,~~and ~~communications~~indications ~~and~~of ~~general~~the ~~administrative~~issuer’s ~~services~~subsequent ~~are~~ability ~~performed~~to byraise ~~AFS~~capital.

~~Cost~~During ~~reimbursements~~2017 toand 2016, the ~~Managing~~Company ~~Member~~recorded ora ~~its~~fair ~~affiliates~~value ~~are~~adjustment ~~based~~of on$219 ~~its~~thousand ~~costs~~and ~~incurred~~$0 into ~~performing~~reduce ~~administrative~~the ~~services~~cost ~~for~~basis ~~the~~of ~~Company.~~an ~~These~~impaired ~~costs~~investment ~~are~~security, ~~allocated~~respectively. toThe ~~each~~reduction ~~managed~~in ~~entity~~value was based on ~~certain~~a ~~criteria~~market ~~such~~approach astechnique ~~total~~and ~~assets,~~uses ~~number~~inputs ofthat ~~investors~~reflect orqualitative ~~contributed~~and ~~capital~~quantitative ~~based~~information ~~upon~~provided by the ~~type~~management of ~~cost~~the ~~incurred~~investee. ~~The~~Such ~~Managing~~information ~~Member~~indicated ~~believes~~reduced ~~that~~growth ~~the~~opportunity ~~costs~~and ~~reimbursed~~eventual ~~are~~reduction ~~the~~in ~~lower~~cash offlows ~~(i)~~and ~~actual~~revenues. ~~costs~~Under ~~incurred~~the onFair ~~behalf~~Value Measurements Topic of the ~~Company~~FASB orAccounting ~~(ii)~~Standards ~~the~~Codification, ~~amount~~ the ~~Company~~fair ~~would~~value beof ~~required~~the toaforementioned ~~pay~~impaired ~~independent~~investment ~~parties~~securities ~~for~~were ~~comparable~~classified ~~administrative~~within ~~services~~Level in3 of the ~~same~~valuation ~~geographic location~~hierarchy.

TheImpaired Managingoff-lease Memberequipment and/or affiliates earned fees and billed for reimbursements, pursuant to the Operating Agreement, during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 as follows (in thousandsnon-recurring):

	2016		2015
Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	160	$	220
Asset management fees to Managing Member		48		69
	$	208	$	289

During 2017, the Company deemed certain off-lease equipment (assets) to be impaired and recorded fair value adjustments of $281 thousand to reduce the cost basis of the equipment. During 2016, the Company had no fair value adjustments relative to impaired equipment.

8.The ~~Non~~aforementioned adjustments were non-~~recourse~~recurring. ~~debt:~~Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair values of such impaired equipment are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy as the data sources utilized for the valuation of the assets reflect significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Such valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs that reflect the sales price of similar assets sold by affiliates and/or information from third party remarketing agents not readily available in the market.

At December 31, 2016, non-recourse debt consists of notes payable to financial institutions. The notes are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes is at fixed rates ranging from 1.97% to 2.39% per annum. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At December 31, 2016, gross operating lease rentals totaled approximately $581 thousand over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $1.4 million. The notes mature at various dates from 2017 through 2018. 28

27TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

811. Non-recourseFair debtvalue measurements: - (continued)

The ~~non-recourse~~table ~~debt~~below ~~does~~presents ~~not contain any material financial covenants. The debt is secured by a specific lien granted by~~ the ~~Company~~fair tovalue ~~the~~measurement non-recourse lender on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lender has recourse only to the following collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of ~~the~~assets ~~foregoing items. The non-recourse obligation is payable solely out of the respective specific security~~ and ~~the~~liabilities ~~Company~~measured ~~does~~at ~~not~~fair ~~guarantee~~value ~~(nor~~on ~~is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as~~ a ~~general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the~~ non-~~recourse~~recurring ~~debt~~basis ~~apart from the security granted, the Company is directly~~ and ~~generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to~~ the ~~lender,~~level ~~such~~within ~~as warranties as to genuineness of~~ the ~~transaction~~hierarchy ~~parties’ signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company’s good title to or perfected interest~~ in ~~the~~which ~~secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in~~ the ~~equipment~~fair ~~finance~~value ~~industry,~~measurements ~~and~~fall ~~are~~at ~~viewed~~December ~~by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly~~31, as2017 ~~there are no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company~~ (in ~~connection~~thousands): ~~with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure.~~

Future minimum payments of non-recourse debt are as follows (in thousands):


	December 31, 2017		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
Impaired off-lease equipment	$	273	$	—	$	—	$	273
Impaired investment securities	$	219	$	—	$	—	$	219

	Principal		Interest		Total
Year ending December 31, 2017	$	464	$	7	$	471
2018		102		1		103
	$	566	$	8	$	574

The following tables summarize the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s recurring and non-recurring fair value calculation/adjustments categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

9. Commitments:


December 31, 2017
Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes formulation	Stock price	$0.02 – $14.75
			Exercise price	$0.36 – $25.76
			Time to maturity (in years)	0.75 – 5.84
			Risk-free interest rate	1.65% – 2.25%
			Annualized volatility	48.32% – 83.30%
Impaired off-lease equipment	Non-recurring	Market Approach	Third Party Agents’ pricing Quotes – Per Equipment	$72,525 – $200,000
			Equipment Condition	Good
Investment Securities	Non-recurring	Market Approach	Qualitative and quantitative	Not Applicable

At December 31, 2016, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets and fund investments in notes receivable.


December 31, 2016
Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes formulation	Stock price	$0.01 – $14.75
			Exercise price	$0.14 – $25.76
			Time to maturity (in years)	0.13 – 6.84
			Risk-free interest rate	0.48% – 2.22%
			Annualized volatility	49.69% – 103.87%

10The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. ~~Guarantees:~~Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company ~~enters~~determines ~~into~~the ~~contracts~~estimated ~~that~~fair ~~contain~~value aamounts ~~variety~~by ofusing ~~indemnifications.~~market ~~The~~information ~~Company’s~~and ~~maximum~~valuation ~~exposure~~methodologies ~~under~~that ~~these~~it ~~arrangements~~considers isappropriate ~~unknown.~~and ~~However,~~consistent with the ~~Company~~fair ~~has~~value ~~not~~accounting ~~had~~guidance. ~~prior~~Considerable ~~claims~~judgment oris ~~losses~~required ~~pursuant~~ to ~~these~~interpret ~~contracts~~market ~~and~~data ~~expects~~to develop the ~~risk~~estimates of ~~loss~~fair tovalue. beThe ~~remote~~use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

TheCash Managing Member knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Company’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Company believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industrycash practice, and that any potential liability under the Company’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Company would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP. equivalents

~~11.~~The ~~Members~~recorded amounts of the Company’s ~~capital:~~cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

A total of 2,992,482 Units were issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Member (Managing Member). The Fund was authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial Member. 29

~~The~~TABLE ~~Company~~OF has the right, exercisable at the Managing Member’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Company is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the Managing Member on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the Managing Member deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Company; provided, the Company is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the CONTENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11. Members’Fair capitalvalue measurements: - (continued)

Units.Notes All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs. No units were repurchased during 2016 or 2015. receivable

The ~~Fund’s~~fair ~~net~~value ~~income~~of orthe ~~net~~Company’s ~~losses~~notes ~~are~~receivable tois begenerally ~~allocated~~estimated ~~100%~~based toupon ~~the~~various ~~Members.~~methodologies ~~From~~deployed ~~the~~by ~~commencement~~financial ofand ~~the~~credit ~~Fund~~management ~~until~~including, ~~the~~but ~~initial~~not ~~closing~~limited ~~date~~to, ~~net~~credit ~~income~~analysis, ~~and~~third ~~net~~party ~~loss~~appraisal ~~were allocated 99% to the Managing Member~~ and/or 1%discounted tocash ~~the~~flow ~~initial~~analysis ~~members.~~based ~~Commencing~~upon ~~with~~current ~~the~~market ~~initial~~valuation ~~closing~~techniques ~~date, net income~~ and ~~net~~market ~~loss~~rates ~~are~~for tosimilar betypes ~~allocated~~of ~~92.5%~~lending toarrangements, ~~the~~which ~~Other~~may ~~Members~~consider ~~and~~adjustments ~~7.5%~~for toimpaired ~~the~~loans ~~Managing~~as ~~Member~~deemed necessary.

FundInvestment distributions are to be allocated 7.5% to the Managing Member and 92.5% to the Other Members. The Company commenced periodic distributions in December 2008. securities

~~Distributions~~The toCompany’s ~~the~~investment ~~Other~~securities ~~Members~~are ~~for~~not ~~the~~registered ~~years~~for ~~ended~~public ~~December~~sale ~~31,~~and ~~2016~~are ~~and~~carried ~~2015~~at ~~were~~cost aswhich ~~follows~~management ~~(in~~believes ~~thousands~~approximates ~~except~~fair ~~Units~~value, ~~and~~as ~~per~~appropriately ~~Unit~~adjusted ~~data):~~for impairment.

	2016		2015
Distributions	$	2,693	$	2,694
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		2,992,482		2,992,482
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	0.90	$	0.90

Non-recourse and Long-term debt

~~12.~~The ~~Fair~~fair value ~~measurements:~~of the Company’s non-recourse and long-term debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

FairCommitments value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows: Contingencies

~~Level~~Management ~~1 — Quoted~~has ~~prices~~determined inthat ~~active~~no ~~markets~~recognition for ~~identical~~the ~~assets~~fair orvalue ~~liabilities.~~of ~~An active market for~~ the ~~asset~~Company’s orloan ~~liability~~commitments is anecessary ~~market~~because intheir ~~which~~terms ~~transactions~~are ~~for~~made ~~the~~on ~~asset~~a ormarket ~~liability~~rate ~~occur~~basis ~~with sufficient frequency~~ and ~~volume~~require borrowers to ~~provide~~be ~~pricing~~in ~~information~~compliance onwith anthe ~~ongoing~~Company’s ~~basis,~~credit ~~generally~~requirements onat athe ~~national~~time ~~exchange~~of funding.

~~Level~~The ~~2 — Quoted~~fair ~~prices~~value ~~for~~of ~~similar~~contingent ~~instruments~~liabilities in(or ~~active~~guarantees) ~~markets,~~is ~~quoted~~not ~~prices~~considered ~~for~~material ~~identical~~because ormanagement ~~similar~~believes ~~instruments~~there inhas ~~markets~~been ~~that~~no ~~are~~event ~~not~~that ~~active,~~has ~~and~~occurred ~~model-based~~wherein ~~valuations~~a inguarantee ~~which~~liability ~~all~~has ~~significant~~been ~~inputs~~incurred ~~are~~or ~~observable~~will inlikely ~~the~~be ~~market~~incurred.

~~Level~~The ~~3 — Valuation~~following istables ~~modeled~~present ~~using~~estimated ~~significant~~fair ~~inputs~~values ~~that~~of ~~are~~the ~~unobservable~~Company’s financial instruments in ~~the~~accordance ~~market.~~with ~~These~~the ~~unobservable~~guidance ~~inputs~~provided ~~reflect~~by the ~~Company’s~~Financial ~~own~~Instruments ~~estimates~~Topic of ~~assumptions~~the ~~that~~FASB ~~market~~Accounting ~~participants~~Standards ~~would~~Codification ~~use~~at inDecember ~~pricing~~31, ~~the~~2017 ~~asset~~and or2016 ~~liability.~~(in thousands):

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis. During 2016, the Company had no non-recurring adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain assets deemed impaired. During 2015, the Company recorded non-recurring adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain investment in securities deemed impaired in 2015.


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	479	$	479	$	—	$	—	$	479
Investment in securities		27		—		—		27		27
Warrants, fair value		149		—		—		149		149
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		103		—		—		102		102

The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,033	$	1,033	$	—	$	—	$	1,033
Investment in securities		272		—		—		272		272
Warrants, fair value		159		—		—		159		159
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		566		—		—		566		566

2930

~~ATEL~~TABLE ~~12,~~OF ~~LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~CONTENTS

12Item 9. ~~Fair~~CHANGES ~~value~~IN ~~measurements:~~AND -DISAGREEMENTS ~~(continued)~~WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

~~Such~~None. ~~fair value adjustments utilized the following methodology:~~

~~Warrants~~Item ~~(recurring)~~9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $159 thousand and $327 thousand, respectively. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 recurring assets (in thousands):

	Level 3 Assets
	2016			2015
Balance at beginning of period	$	327		$	393
Unrealized loss on warrants, net recorded during the year		(168	)		(66	)
Balance at end of period	$	159		$	327

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had no notes receivable. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $309 thousand in notes receivable and no impairment adjustment was recorded.

Impaired investment securities (non-recurring)

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. The investment securities are adjusted for impairment, if any, based upon factors which include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital.

During 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded no fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of investment securities. A majority of the reduction in value was based on a market approach technique and uses inputs that reflect qualitative and quantitative information provided by the management of the investee, which indicated reduced growth opportunity and eventual reduction in cash flows and revenues. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair value of impaired assets is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table presents the fair value measurements of impaired investment securities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

		December 31, 2015				Level 1 Estimated Fair Value				Level 2 Estimated Fair Value				Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Impaired investment in securities		$	4			$	—			$	—			$	4

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

December 31, 2016
Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes formulation	Stock price	$0.01 – $14.75
			Exercise price	$0.14 – $25.76
			Time to maturity (in years)	0.13 – 6.84
			Risk-free interest rate	0.48% – 2.22%
			Annualized volatility	49.69% – 103.87%

December 31, 2015
Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes formulation	Stock price	$0.10 – $25.76
			Exercise price	$0.14 – $25.76
			Time to maturity (in years)	1.13 – 7.84
			Risk-free interest rate	0.72% – 2.14%
			Annualized volatility	100.00%
Impaired Investment in Securities	Non-recurring	Market Approach	Qualitative and quantitative information (Investee Management)	Not Applicable

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company determines the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

Notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is generally estimated based upon various methodologies deployed by financial and credit management including, but not limited to, credit analysis, third party appraisal and/or discounted cash flow analysis based upon current market valuation techniques and market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, which may consider adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary.

Investment in securities

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost which management believes approximates fair value, as appropriately adjusted for impairment.

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Non-recourse and Long-term debt

The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse and long-term debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Commitments and Contingencies

Management has determined that no recognition for the fair value of the Company’s loan commitments is necessary because their terms are made on a market rate basis and require borrowers to be in compliance with the Company’s credit requirements at the time of funding.

The fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred.

The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,033	$	1,033	$	—	$	—	$	1,033
Investment in securities		272		—		—		272		272
Warrants, fair value		159		—		—		159		159
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		566		—		—		566		566

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,340	$	2,340	$	—	$	—	$	2,340
Notes receivable, net		309		—		—		309		309
Investment in securities		300		—		—		300		300
Warrants, fair value		327		—		—		327		327
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		1,021		—		—		1,017		1,017

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company’s Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the Managing Member, who is responsible for providing the Company with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Managing Member’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Company, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Management of the Managing Member is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) for the Company, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. The internal control process of the Managing Member, as it is applicable to the Company, was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of the Management of the Managing Member; and

(2)

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All internal control processes, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those processes determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management of the Managing Member assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment, Management of the Managing Member concluded that the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, was effective as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

3331

~~This~~TABLE ~~annual~~OF report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which exempts non-accelerated filers from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. CONTENTS

This annual report does not include an audit report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s internal control over financial reporting was not subject to audit by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which exempts non-accelerated filers from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, during the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company.

3432

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III

Item 10.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

The registrant is a Limited Liability Company and has no officers or directors.

ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS” or “Managing Member” or “Manager”) is the Company’s Managing Member, and is, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group (“ACG” or “ATEL”). The outstanding voting capital stock of ATEL is owned 100% by Dean L. Cash.

Each of AFS and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ACG and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations and communications services, and general administrative services are performed by AFS. ATEL Securities Corporation (“ASC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AFS, performs distribution services in connection with the Company’s public offering of its Units.

The officers and directors of ATEL and its affiliates are as follows:


Dean L. Cash		Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
Paritosh K. Choksi		Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
Vasco H. Morais		Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

Dean L. Cash, age 6667, became chairman, president and chief executive officer of ATEL in April 2001. Mr. Cash joined ATEL as director of marketing in 1980 and served as a vice president since 1981, executive vice president since 1983 and a director since 1984. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Cash was a senior marketing representative for Martin Marietta Corporation, data systems division, from 1979 to 1980. From 1977 to 1979, he was employed by General Electric Corporation, where he was an applications specialist in the medical systems division and a marketing representative in the information services division. Mr. Cash was a systems engineer with Electronic Data Systems from 1975 to 1977, and was involved in maintaining and developing software for commercial applications. Mr. Cash received a B.S. degree in psychology and mathematics in 1972 and an M.B.A. degree with a concentration in finance in 1975 from Florida State University. Mr. Cash is an arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association and is qualified as a registered principal with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Paritosh K. Choksi, age 6364, joined ATEL in 1999 as a director, senior vice president and its chief financial officer. He became its executive vice president and CFO/COO in April 2001. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Choksi was chief financial officer at Wink Communications, Inc. from 1997 to 1999. From 1977 to 1997, Mr. Choksi was with Phoenix American Incorporated, a financial services and management company, where he held various positions during his tenure, and was senior vice president, chief financial officer and director when he left the company. Mr. Choksi was involved in all corporate matters at Phoenix and was responsible for Phoenix’s capital market needs. He also served on the credit committee overseeing all corporate investments, including its venture lease portfolio. Mr. Choksi was a part of the executive management team which caused Phoenix’s portfolio to increase from $50 million in assets to over $2 billion. Mr. Choksi is a member of the board of directors of Syntel, Inc. Mr. Choksi received a bachelor of technology degree in mechanical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay; and an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

Vasco H. Morais, age 5859, joined ATEL in 1989 as general counsel. Mr. Morais manages ATEL’s legal department, which provides legal and contractual support in the negotiating, documenting, drafting, reviewing and funding of lease transactions. In addition, Mr. Morais advises on general corporate law matters, and assists on securities law issues. From 1986 to 1989, Mr. Morais was employed by the BankAmeriLease Companies, Bank of America’s equipment leasing subsidiaries, providing in-house legal support on the documentation of tax-oriented and non-tax oriented direct and leveraged lease transactions, vendor leasing programs and general corporate matters. Prior to the BankAmeriLease Companies, Mr. Morais was with the Consolidated Capital Companies in the Corporate and Securities Legal Department involved in drafting and reviewing contracts, advising on corporate law matters and securities law issues. Mr. Morais received a B.A. degree in 1982 from the University of California in Berkeley, a J.D. degree in 1986 from

3533

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golden Gate University Law School; and an M.B.A. (Finance) degree from Golden Gate University in 1997. Mr. Morais, an active member of the State Bar of California since 1986, served as co-chair of the Uniform Business Law Section of the State Bar of California and was inducted as a fellow of the American College of Commercial Finance Lawyers in 2010.

Audit Committee

The board of directors of the Managing Member acts as the audit committee of the Company. Dean L. Cash and Paritosh K. Choksi are members of the board of directors of the Managing Member and are deemed to be financial experts. They are not independent of the Company.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5, the Company is not aware of any failures to file reports of beneficial ownership required to be filed during or for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

Code of Ethics

A Code of Ethics that is applicable to the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of its Manager, ATEL Financial Services, LLC, or persons acting in such capacity on behalf of the Company, is included as Exhibit 14.1 to this report.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The registrant has no officers or directors.

Set forth hereinafter is a description of the nature of remuneration paid and to be paid to the Manager and its affiliates. The amount of such remuneration paid for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 is set forth in Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions,” at Note 7 thereof, which information is hereby incorporated by reference.

Asset Management Fee and Carried Interest

The Company pays the Manager an annual Asset Management Fee in an amount equal to 4% of Gross Operating Lease Revenues and Cash from Sales or Refinancing. The Asset Management Fee is paid on a monthly basis. The amount of the Asset Management Fee payable in any year is reduced for that year to the extent it would otherwise exceed the Asset Management Fee Limit, as described below. The Asset Management Fee is paid for services rendered by the Manager and its affiliates in determining portfolio and investment strategies and generally managing or supervising the management of the investment portfolio.

The Manager supervises performance of all management activities, including, among other activities: the acquisition and financing of the investment portfolio, collection of lease and loan revenues, monitoring compliance by lessees borrowers with their contract terms, assuring that investment assets are being used in accordance with all operative contractual arrangements, paying operating expenses and arranging for necessary maintenance and repair of equipment and property in the event a lessee fails to do so, monitoring property, sales and use tax compliance and preparation of operating financial data. The Manager intends to delegate all or a portion of its duties and the Asset Management Fee to one or more of its affiliates who are in the business of providing such services.

The Manager also receives, as its Carried Interest, an amount equal to 7.5% of all Company Distributions.

Limitations on Fees

The Fund has adopted a single Asset Management Fee plus the Carried Interest as a means of compensating the Manager for sponsoring the Fund and managing its operations. While this compensation structure is intended to simplify management compensation for purposes of investor’s understanding, state securities administrators use a more complicated compensation structure in their review of equipment program offerings in order to assure that those offerings are fair under the states’ merit review guidelines. The total of all Front End Fees, the Carried Interest and the Asset Management Fee will be subject to the Asset Management Fee Limit in order to assure these state administrators that the Fund will not bear greater fees than permitted under the state merit review guidelines. The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (“NASAA”) is an organization of state securities administrators, those state government agencies responsible for qualifying securities offerings in their respective states. NASAA has established

3634

TABLE OF CONTENTS

standards for the qualification of a number of different types of securities offerings and investment products, including its Statement of Policy on Equipment Programs (the “NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines”). Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines establish the standards for payment of reasonable carried interests, promotional interests and fees for equipment acquisition, management, resale and releasing services to equipment leasing program sponsors. Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines set the maximum compensation payable to the sponsor and its affiliates from an equipment leasing program such as the Fund. The Asset Management Fee Limit will equal the maximum compensation payable under Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines as in effect on the date of the Fund’s prospectus (the “NASAA Fee Limitation”). Under the Asset Management Fee Limit, the Fund will calculate the maximum fees payable under the NASAA Fee Limitation and guarantee that the Asset Management Fee it will pay the Manager and its Affiliates, when added to its Carried Interest, will never exceed the fees and interest payable to a sponsor and its affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation.

Asset Management Fee Limit. The Asset Management Fee Limit will be calculated each year during the Fund’s term by calculating the total fees that would be paid to the Manager if the Manager were to be compensated on the basis of the maximum compensation payable under the NASAA Fee Limitation, including the Manager’s Carried Interest, as described below. To the extent that the amount paid as Front End Fees, the Asset Management Fee, and the Carried Interest for any year would cause the total fees to exceed the aggregate amount of fees calculated under the NASAA Fee Limitation for the year, the Asset Management Fee and/or Carried Interest for that year will be reduced to equal the maximum aggregate fees under the NASAA Fee Limitation. To the extent any such fees are reduced, the amount of such reduction will be accrued and deferred, and such accrued and deferred compensation would be paid to the Manager in a subsequent period, but only to the extent that the deferred compensation would be within the Asset Management Fee Limit for that later period. Any deferred fees that cannot be paid under the applicable limitations through the date of liquidation would be forfeited by the Manager at liquidation.

Under the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines, the Fund is required to commit a minimum percentage of the Gross Proceeds to Investment in Equipment, calculated as the greater of: (i) 80% of the Gross Proceeds reduced by 0.0625% for each 1% of indebtedness encumbering the Fund’s equipment; or (ii) 75% of such Gross Proceeds. The Fund intends to incur total indebtedness equal to 50% of the aggregate cost of its equipment. The Operating Agreement requires the Fund to commit at least 85.875% of the Gross Proceeds to Investment in Equipment. Based on the formula in the NASAA Guidelines, the Fund’s minimum Investment in Equipment would equal 76.875% of Gross Proceeds (80% - [50% × .0625%] = 76.875%), and the Fund’s minimum Investment in Equipment would therefore exceed the NASAA Fee Limitation minimum by 9%.

The amount of the Carried Interest permitted the Manager under the NASAA Fee Limitation will be dependent on the amount by which the percentage of Gross Proceeds the Fund ultimately commits to Investment in Equipment exceeds the minimum Investment in Equipment under the NASAA Fee Limitation. The NASAA Fee Limitation permits the Manager and its Affiliates to receive compensation in the form of a carried interest in Fund Net Income, Net Loss and Distributions equal to 1% for the first 2.5% of excess Investment in Equipment over the NASAA Guidelines minimum, 1% for the next 2% of such excess, and 1% for each additional 1% of excess Investment in Equipment. With a minimum Investment in Equipment of 85.875%, the Manager and its Affiliates may receive an additional carried interest equal to 6.5% of Net Profit, Net Loss and Distributions under the foregoing formula (2.5% + 2% + 4.5% = 9%; 1% + 1% + 4.5% = 6.5%). At the lowest permitted level of Investment in Equipment, the NASAA Guidelines would permit the Manager and its Affiliates to receive a promotional interest equal to 5% of Distributions of Cash from Operations and 1% of Distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds until Members have received total Distributions equal to their Original Invested Capital plus an 8% per annum cumulative return on their Adjusted Invested Capital, and, thereafter, the promotional interest may increase to 15% of all Distributions.

With the additional carried interest calculated as described above, the maximum aggregate fees payable to the Manager and Affiliates under the NASAA Guidelines as carried interest and promotional interest would equal 11.5% of Distributions of Cash from Operations (6.5% + 5% = 11.5%), and 7.5% of Distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds (6.5% + 1% = 7.5%), before the subordination level was reached, and 21.5% of all Distributions thereafter. The maximum amounts to be paid under the terms of the Operating Agreement are subject to the application of the Asset Management Fee Limit provided in Section 8.3 of the Agreement, which limits the annual amount payable to the Manager and its Affiliates as the Asset Management Fee and the Carried Interest to an aggregate not to exceed the total amount of fees that would be payable to the Manager and its Affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation.

Upon completion of the offering of Units, final commitment of offering proceeds to acquisition of equipment and establishment of final levels of permanent portfolio debt, the Manager will calculate the maximum carried interest and promotional interest payable to the Manager and its Affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation and compare such total permitted fees to the total of the Asset Management Fee and Manager’s Carried Interest. If and to the extent that the

3735

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Asset Management Fee and Manager’s Carried Interest would exceed the fees calculated under the NASAA Fee Limitation, the fees payable to the Manager and its Affiliates will be reduced by an amount sufficient to cause the total of such compensation to comply with the NASAA Fee Limitation. The adjusted Asset Management Fee Limit will then be applied to the Asset Management Fee and Carried Interest as described above. A comparison of the Front End Fees actually paid by the Fund and the NASAA Fee Limitation maximums will be repeated, and any required adjustments will be made, at least annually thereafter.

See Note 76 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for amounts paid.

Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, no investor is known to hold beneficially more than 5% of the issued and outstanding Units.

Security Ownership of Management

The parent of ATEL Financial Services, LLC is the beneficial owner of Limited Liability Company Units as follows:


(1) Title of Class	(2) Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	(3) Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	(4) Percent of Class
Limited Liability Company Units	ATEL Capital Group The Transamerica Pyramid 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111	Initial Limited Liability Company Units 50 Units ($500)	0.0017%

See Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions” at Note 76 thereof.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

During the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the Company incurred audit fees with its principal auditors totaling $8297 thousand and $7182 thousand, respectively.

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees and expenses billed in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

The board of directors of the Managing Member acts as the audit committee of the registrant. Engagements for audit services, audit related services and tax services are approved in advance by the Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Member acting on behalf of the board of directors of the Managing Member in its role as the audit committee of the Company.

3836

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

Financial Statements and Schedules

Financial Statements

Included in Part II of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			11
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015			12
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016			12
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015			13
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016			13
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015			14
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016			14
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015			15
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016			15
Notes to Financial Statements			16

Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

(b)

Exhibits

(3) and (4) Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement, included as exhibit B to the Prospectus effective September 26, 2007 as filed on October 2, 2007 (File Number 333-142034) is hereby incorporated herein by reference

(14.1) Code of Ethics


(14.1)		Code of Ethics
(31.1)		Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(31.2)		Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(32.1)		Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
(32.2)		Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
(101.INS)		XBRL Instance Document
(101.SCH)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
(101.CAL)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
(101.LAB)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
(101.PRE)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
(101.DEF)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

~~(31.1) Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)~~37

~~(31.2)~~TABLE ~~Certification~~OF ~~of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)~~CONTENTS

(32.1) Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350

(32.2) Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350

(101.INS) XBRL Instance Document

(101.SCH) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

(101.CAL) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

(101.LAB) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

(101.PRE) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(101.DEF) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 1726, ~~2017~~2018

ATEL 12, LLC (Registrant)

By:

ATEL Financial Services, LLC
Managing Member of Registrant

By:

/s/ Dean L. Cash

Dean L. Cash,
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, (Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi

Paritosh K. Choksi,
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Samuel Schussler

Samuel Schussler,
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE	CAPACITIES	DATE
/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, (Managing Member)	March 1726, ~~2017~~2018
/s/ Paritosh K. ChoksiParitosh K. Choksi	Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)	March 1726, ~~2017~~2018
/s/ Samuel SchusslerSamuel Schussler	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)	March 1726, ~~2017~~2018

No proxy materials have been or will be sent to security holders. An annual report will be furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing of this report on Form 10-K, and copies thereof will be furnished supplementally to the Commission when forwarded to the security holders.

4038

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission File number 333000-14203453618

ATEL 12, LLC

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

Narrative Description of Business

Equipment Leasing Activities

Notes Receivable Activities

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

PART II

Market Information

Fund Valuation

Background to Fund Valuation

Methodologies

Net Investment Methodology

Appraised Value Methodology

Unit Valuation

Disclosure

Specifics Underlying Valuation Methodology:

Notes and Explanation of Valuation Components and Calculation

ATEL 12, LLC Unit Valuation

Disclaimer

Distributions

Overview

Results of Operations

20162017 versus 20152016

Revenues

Expenses

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Cash Flows

20162017 versus 20152016

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

Distributions

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTSBALANCE OFSHEETS INCOMEDECEMBER FOR31, THE2017 YEARSAND ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

SeeATEL accompanying12, notes.LLC STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 (In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 12, LLC STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016(In Thousands)

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Use of Estimates:

Accounts receivable:

Credit risk:

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Direct financing leases and related revenue recognition:

Notes receivable, unearned interest income and related revenue recognition:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Initial direct costs:

Acquisition expense:

Asset valuation:

Segment reporting:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Investment in securities:

Purchased securities

Warrants

Unearned operating lease income:

Income Taxes:

ATEL 12, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Per Unit data:

Recent accounting pronouncements:

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 12, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
(In Thousands)

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 12, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Filing Compare · ATEL 12, LLC