UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

______________

FORM 8-K

______________

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 830, 2013

Teletouch Communications, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

______________

Delaware	001-13436	75-2556090
(State or Other Jurisdiction	(Commission	(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation)	File Number)	Identification No.)

5718 Airport Freeway, Fort Worth, Texas 76117

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(800) 232-3888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 51.0201 ~~Departure~~Entry ofinto ~~Directors~~a orMaterial ~~Principal~~Definitive ~~Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers~~Agreement

The information set forth under Item 52.0304 in this Form 8-K is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 52.0304 ~~Amendment~~Triggering toEvents ~~Articles~~That ofAccelerate ~~Incorporation~~or Increase a Direct Financial Obligation or ~~Bylaws;~~an ~~Change~~Obligation inunder ~~Fiscal~~an ~~Year~~Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement

AsExit previously disclosed in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 28, 2013 (the “March 28 8-K”), on March 22, 2013, Teletouch Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), received a written communication on behalf of ~~Stratford Capital~~Wholesale ~~Partners,~~Distribution ~~L.P. (“Stratford”) and Retail & Restaurant Growth Capital, L.P. (“RRGC”, together,~~Line ~~”Stratford/RRGC”), submitting written consents~~ of certain shareholders of the Company (the “Consent of Shareholders”) relating to certain shareholder proposals (as set forth in the March 28 8-K and incorporated by reference herein). Such shareholder proposals included, among other things, appointment of Joseph L. Harberg, Raymond C. Hemmig, Scott M. Kleberg, David W. Knickel and Charles Daniel Yost (collectively, the “Board Appointees”), to serve as directors of the Company. Stratford/RRGC voted 17,610,000 and 11,740,000 shares of the Company’s common stock each entity beneficially owns on each of the shareholder proposals above, respectively, and Lazarus Investment Capital Partners LLLP (“Lazarus”) voted 5,285,397 shares of the Company’s common stock on the same proposals, which, in toto, represent approximately 70.3% of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of March 22, 2013Business; asUpdate of the same date, the Company had 49,272,733 shares of common stock outstanding (there appears to be a difference of approximately 19,092 shares between the number of shares voted by Lazarus and Lazarus’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s securities as reflected in its public filings with the SEC; in reporting the events subject hereof, the Company will rely on ~~Lazarus’ representations as to~~ the ~~extent~~Financial ~~of its ownership of the Company’s outstanding securities as set in the Consent of Shareholders).~~Status

InAs ~~the~~previously disclosed, ~~process~~during its 4th quarter of ~~verifying common~~fiscal ~~stock~~year ~~record~~2012, ~~ownership~~Teletouch ofCommunications, ~~each~~Inc., ofa Delaware corporation (the “Company”), ~~shareholders~~determined ~~that~~to ~~executed~~concentrate ~~the~~its ~~Consent~~efforts ofon ~~Shareholders~~growing ~~and,~~its ~~specifically,~~wholesale ofdistribution ~~reconciling~~business to offset the ~~Lazarus’s~~declining ~~share~~revenues ~~ownership~~and ~~set~~loss ~~forth~~of operating margins in its ~~Consent~~cellular ofbusiness. ~~Shareholders~~Over ~~with~~the ~~its~~past ~~public~~twelve ~~filings~~months, ~~with~~the Company has attempted to address the ~~SEC~~lagging sales and ~~with~~margin figures through more direct involvement by the Company’s senior ~~list~~management ofteam ~~record~~with ~~holders~~the manufacturers, itpotential ~~came~~customers toand ~~the~~wholesale division personnel. Namely, by June 2012, the Company’s ~~attention~~had ~~that~~completed negotiations relating to several new distribution agreements to provide additional products for the wholesale ~~consent~~business ofand ~~Lazarus~~had ~~was~~hired a management and sales team to execute upon its anticipated growth plan. However, these additional efforts have not ~~executed~~shown byto be successful and the ~~broker~~Company ~~listed~~sustained significant losses in its efforts to grow this assegment of its business. Through the ~~record~~nine-month ~~holder~~period ofended February 28, 2013, the ~~shares~~wholesale business has incurred an operating loss of $697,000 and these losses have continued through the ~~Company’s~~4th ~~outstanding~~quarter ~~common~~ended ~~stock~~May ~~purported~~31, 2013 due to increasingly below ~~beneficially~~sales. ~~owned~~As bya ~~Lazarus as~~result of the ~~time~~challenges ofto this effort and the ~~execution~~inability of ~~its~~the ~~Consent~~Company ofto ~~Shareholders~~sustain ~~(the~~further losses, ~~“Lazarus~~on ~~Shares”)~~May 29, ~~which~~2013, ~~called~~the ~~into~~Company ~~question~~decided ~~whether~~to exit this line of business, effective as of ~~March~~June 227, 2013. As a result, the Company ~~Board~~terminated ~~Appointees~~all ~~had~~sales ~~been~~and ~~properly~~management ~~appointed~~personnel related to the ~~Board~~wholesale ~~under~~business, ~~Delaware~~notified ~~law~~all of its customers that the Company was exiting this line of business and began the process of liquidating all remaining excess inventory. To date, the Company incurred approximately $33,000 of severance costs related to the foregoing exit efforts.

OnAs ~~April~~a 8,consequence ~~2013~~of the Company’s losses from sustaining the wholesale distribution operations, the ~~foregoing~~ ~~deficiency~~Company ~~was~~is ~~remedied~~now byexperiencing significant liquidity challenges. Furthermore, the ~~delivery~~Company byhas ~~Stratford/RRGC~~been and remains unable to meet its consolidated financial projections that were made to its senior lender, DCP (as ~~re-executed~~defined bybelow), ~~Lazarus~~ and, ~~executed~~DCP byhas been notified that the ~~record~~Company ~~holder~~failed to meet its financial covenants ofunder the ~~shares~~DCP ~~beneficially~~Loan ~~owned~~Agreement, bydescribed ~~Lazarus)~~below. The remaining cellular operations of athe ~~shareholder~~business ~~consent~~are ~~representing~~continuing to decline, as anticipated, so the ~~Lazarus~~Company ~~Shares~~is ~~dated~~currently evaluating its options to improve its liquidity, including, without limitation, further cost reduction plans as well as capital raising opportunities. Pursuant to the DCP Loan Agreement, the Company is required to provide a plan that is acceptable to DCP. In the absence of ~~April~~such 8plan or in the event DCP does not accept such plan when presented, ~~2013~~DCP could seek to avail itself of remedies under the DCP Loan Agreement, including, among others, foreclosing on the assets of the Company or by directing the Company to liquidate substantially all of its assets in an orderly manner to satisfy this debt.

OnDCP ~~April~~Revolving ~~11,~~Facility ~~2013, the~~– ~~Board, including the Board Appointees, convened a special meeting (the “April 11 Meeting”) to approve, authorize~~Events ~~and ratify all~~ of the actions that had been taken by them during the time period from March 22, 2013 to April 8, 2013. The actions approved, ratified and adopted at the April 11 Meeting included those described below in this Item 5.03.Default

~~Board~~As ~~Committee~~previously ~~Appointments;~~disclosed, on ~~Lead~~February ~~Independent~~8, 2013, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “DCP Loan Agreement”) with DCP, Teletouch ~~Director~~Lender, ~~Designation~~LLC (“DCP”), a New York based private lender. Under the terms of the DCP Loan Agreement, the Company had the ability to borrow up to $6 million under the DCP Loan Agreement’s revolving credit facility. The term of the loan initially matures on January 31, 2015 and may be extended for an additional year at the Company’s sole election. The DCP Loan Agreement contains events of default and remedy provisions customary for loan transaction documents of this nature. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, in some cases following a notice and cure period, DCP may accelerate the maturity of the loan and require the full and immediate repayment of all borrowings under the DCP Loan Agreement.

At the closing of the DCP Loan Agreement on February 8, 2013, the Company had an initial draw-down of funds under the revolving credit facility of $4.3 million, of which $400,000 was considered a temporary supplemental advance to help pay certain closing fees. The ~~Board~~supplemental ~~has~~advance ~~appointed~~was ~~directors~~intended to ~~Board~~be ~~committees~~ repaid from proceeds generated by the Company’s efforts to recover Texas sales tax amounts that were not billed to its current and ~~designated~~former customers. During the ~~chairman~~process of ~~each~~closing ~~committee~~the loan with DCP, and as ~~follows:~~previously disclosed, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the State of Texas requiring the Company to pay $1,414,000 in sales and use tax that was assessed following a tax audit of the Company covering 2006 through 2009. Through the date of this Current Report, the Company has repaid approximately $757,000 of this obligation and is continuing with its efforts to recover a portion of these sales taxes from its customers. However, to date, these sales tax recovery efforts have not generated the proceeds as expected and, therefore, the Company has not been able to meet the repayment terms related to the supplemental advance from DCP. Among other requirements under the DCP Loan Agreement, the Company was required to pay the supplemental advance down to $300,000 by May 9, 2013, to $200,000 - by June 8, 2013 and in full by July 8, 2013. The Company was unable to meet its obligation to meet the May 9, 2013 supplemental advance by May 9, 2013, and, on May 1, 2013, the Company and DCP agreed to extend the payment date on the first supplemental advance payment to June 1, 2013. However, the Company was not able to meet the extended payment date either; nor was it able to make the subsequent payment dates in June or July and, therefore, may be deemed in default of one of the financial covenants under the DCP Loan Agreement.

~~(i)~~On ~~Audit~~June ~~Committee~~15, ~~membership:~~2013, ~~Scott~~the Company M.also ~~Kleberg~~may ~~(Chairman)~~be deemed to have triggered a non-payment default provision under the DCP Loan Agreement when the loan amount was overadvanced, ~~Charles~~as ~~Daniel~~the ~~Yost~~term is defined under the DCP Loan Agreement. ~~(ii)~~The ~~Compensation~~overadvancement ~~Committee~~in ~~membership:~~the ~~Charles~~amount ~~Daniel~~of ~~Yost~~approximately ~~(Chairman)~~$164,000 resulted ~~David~~in W.the ~~Knickel~~Company ~~and~~not ~~Joseph~~having L.sufficient ~~Harberg.~~cash ~~(iii)~~on ~~Nominating~~hand to repay the principal obligations due and ~~Corporate~~payable ~~Governance~~under ~~Raymond~~the C.DCP ~~Hemmig~~Loan Agreement ~~(Chairman)~~within 48 hours, ~~Scott~~which Mdefault was then cured on June 19, 2013 by adding additional assets to the borrowing base thereby remedying the alleged event of default. ~~Kleberg~~However, on June 24, 2013 the Company again became overadvanced under the DCP Loan Agreement and ~~Committee~~this ~~membership:~~situation ~~David~~continued W.through ~~Knickel~~the remainder of the month of June 2013 and is continuing through the date of this Current Report.

~~Also~~In addition, ~~Raymond~~the CCompany may be deemed by DCP to have triggered defaults under certain additional financial covenants under the DCP Loan Agreement. ~~Hemmig~~Namely, ~~was~~pursuant ~~designated~~to asa lease agreement with the ~~Lead~~Dallas ~~Independent~~Cowboys ~~Director~~for ofan annual stadium suite, the ~~Board~~Company was obligated to make a payment which was due March 1, 2013. ~~The~~As ~~Board~~of ~~designated~~April ~~this~~30, ~~new~~2013, ~~position~~the Company’s obligation to ~~serve~~make inthe arequired ~~lead~~payment ~~capacity~~was more than 60 todays ~~coordinate~~past due. The Company was noticed by the ~~activities~~lessor offor the ~~other~~full ~~non-employee~~lease payment in the amount of $200,000, ~~independent~~plus ~~directors~~$10,000 ~~and~~late fees, which is due in full by July 15, 2013. In the event of the Company’s inability to ~~perform~~make such ~~other~~payment, ~~duties~~the ~~and~~matter ~~responsibilities~~will be subject asto collections under the ~~Board~~terms ~~may~~of ~~determine~~the lease agreement. ~~The~~In ~~duties~~addition, ~~and~~in ~~responsibilities~~the event of default under the ~~Lead~~lease ~~Independent~~agreement, ~~Director~~the ~~will~~full extent beof ~~governed~~the byCompany’s aobligation ~~written~~under ~~charter to~~the beforegoing ~~adopted~~lease byof ~~the~~approximately ~~Board~~$3.6 million will become immediately due and payable.

~~The~~Further, ~~Board~~under ~~also established~~the terms of the DCP Loan Agreement, the Company must meet certain quarterly financial covenants, including minimum earnings and a debt ~~fully~~service ~~empowered~~coverage ~~Special~~ratio ~~Committee~~that toranges ~~investigate~~between ~~alleged~~1.10 ~~violations~~and of1.25 ~~Section~~over ~~16(b)~~the life of the ~~Securities~~revolving ~~Exchange~~credit ~~Act~~facility. ofIf ~~1934,~~the Company does asnot ~~amended~~meet the quarterly financial covenants, it may be subject to the default interest rate of 20% and/or possible acceleration of the promissory note executed in connection with ~~certain~~the ~~transactions~~DCP inLoan ~~August~~Agreement. ~~2011~~On ~~and~~June 27, 2013, following ~~such~~the ~~date~~completion ~~involving~~of ~~certain~~its ~~affiliated~~preliminary close ~~persons~~of its 4th quarter financials, the Company notified DCP that it would not meet the earnings or debt service coverage ~~and~~financial ~~entities.~~covenants ~~The~~for ~~committee~~the is4th ~~comprised~~fiscal quarter thereby triggering an “event of ~~Scott~~default” Munder the DCP Loan Agreement. ~~Kleberg~~DCP notified the Company that the default interest will be applied to the loan amount beginning June 1, 2013 and ~~Charles~~that DCP ~~Daniel~~would ~~Yost~~need to determine whether it would be willing to modify the DCP Loan Agreement to allow the Company to regain compliance with the terms of such agreement. The ~~Special~~DCP ~~Committee~~Loan isAgreement ~~delegated~~allows DCP to immediately accelerate all amounts due under the ~~unlimited~~loan to ~~authority~~the Company; however, ~~without~~as ~~further~~of ~~authorization~~the ~~from~~date hereof, the ~~Board~~Company has not been notified of any such acceleration by DCP. On June 27, 2013, the Company agreed to ~~consider~~make ~~any~~a ~~and~~$500,000 ~~all~~payment ~~matters~~against ~~that~~the itoutstanding ~~may~~balance ~~consider~~of ~~relevant~~the orloan ~~related~~in consideration for DCP’s agreeing not to retain all of the ~~foregoing~~Company’s ~~Section~~cash ~~16(b)~~on ~~related~~hand ~~matters~~and future collections and require daily borrowing requests to fund operating costs. DCP has reserved all rights and remedies available to it as a result of the foregoing alleged defaults.

~~CFO~~On ~~Severance~~July ~~Related~~8, 2013, the Company received a demand from DCP to make a $300,000 payment against the overadvance. Following this repayment, the Company is left with less than $200,000 of cash remaining in its operating accounts. DCP has continued to reserve all rights available to it under the DCP Loan Agreement and as of the date of this filing has not acted on its right to take control of all of the Company’s cash while the overadvance continues. DCP has communicated to the Company that it was in the process of formally noticing the Company of the default under the DCP Loan Agreement and will continue to evaluate its intent to continue funding the overadvance to allow the Company to continue to operate. As of the date of this filing, such notice from DCP has not been received and to the best of the Company’s knowledge, DCP has not commenced any other actions against the Company at this time.

InReal ~~order~~Estate to encourage Douglas E. Sloan’s (the Chief Financial Officer of the Company) retention and continued employment at the Company, the Board determined that in the event of a not for cause termination of his employment by the Company, he will be entitled to receive and the Company will be obligated to pay him a severance amount equal to one half (1/2) of his base salary in effect immediately prior to the date of such termination. The Board also instructed the Compensation Committee to consider and recommend terms for Mr. Sloan’s employment at the Company going forward.Loans

~~Non-Renewal~~As previously disclosed, the Company’s real estate loan agreements with East West Bank and Jardine Capital Corporation, with the outstanding balances of ~~Executive~~approximately ~~Employment~~$1,984,400 and $525,900 as of the date of this filing, respectively, initially matured on May 3, 2012. Subsequently, ~~Agreements~~Jardine Capital Corporation has granted several extensions of the maturity of the loan balance and has recently granted another extension of the maturity of the loan through May 31, 2013 for a 1% extension fee (approximately $5,350) with no changes in the terms under the original agreement. Prior to the May 31, 2013 maturity of the Jardine Bank debt, the Company requested another loan extension, but as of the date hereof, no such extension has been granted.

On ~~December~~May 3123, ~~2008~~2013, ~~the~~ ~~Board of Directors (~~the Company ~~“Board”)~~amended ofits ~~Teletouch~~previously ~~Communications,~~disclosed ~~Inc.~~loan ~~(the “Company”) approved an executive employment~~ agreement with anEast ~~effective~~West ~~date~~Bank ofto ~~June~~extend ~~1, 2008, by and between~~ the ~~Company~~maturity ~~and~~date ~~Robert~~under M.from ~~McMurrey~~February ~~(the “McMurrey Agreement”)~~3, ~~as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The McMurrey Agreement had an initial term commencing~~ on2013 ~~June~~to 1,August ~~2008 and ending May~~ 31, ~~2011,~~2013. ~~and~~In byconsideration ~~its~~of ~~terms~~such ~~automatically renewed for successive additional one year term(s)~~extension, ~~unless either~~ the Company ormade ~~Mr.~~a ~~McMurrey~~principal ~~gave~~payment ~~the~~in ~~other party an advance written notice not to renew~~ the ~~McMurrey~~amount ~~Agreement.~~of ~~By its terms~~$50, on000 ~~May 31, 2012, the McMurrey Agreement automatically renewed for~~ and an ~~additional~~extension ~~one~~fee ~~year~~of ~~term ending May 31~~$5, ~~2013~~159.

~~Also,~~The onCompany ~~December~~is ~~31,~~investigating ~~2008,~~refinancing ~~the~~opportunities ~~Board~~ of the ~~Company~~real ~~approved~~estate ansubject ~~executive~~to ~~employment~~the ~~agreement~~foregoing ~~with~~loan anagreements. ~~effective~~If ~~date~~the ofreal ~~June~~estate 1,that ~~2008,~~is bysubject ~~and~~of ~~between~~ the above-referenced ~~Company~~real ~~and~~estate ~~Thomas~~loan A.agreements ~~“Kip”~~is ~~Hyde~~sold, ~~Jr. (~~the ~~“Hyde~~Company ~~Agreement”),~~may asreceive sufficient proceeds to pay the ~~Company’s~~balance ~~President~~due ~~and~~on all ~~Chief~~of ~~Operating~~its ~~Officer.~~current ~~The~~real ~~Hyde~~estate ~~Agreement~~debt. ~~provided~~However, ~~for~~that anthe ~~initial~~Company ~~term~~can ~~commencing~~provide onno ~~June~~assurance 1,it ~~2008~~will ~~and~~be ~~ending~~successful ~~May~~in ~~31,~~securing ~~2011,~~new ~~and~~real ~~automatically~~estate ~~renewed~~financing, ~~for~~or ~~successive~~that ~~additional~~the ~~one~~proceeds ~~year~~of ~~term(s),~~the ~~unless~~sale ~~either~~or the ~~Company~~real orestate ~~Mr.~~will ~~Hyde~~be ~~gave~~sufficient to pay the ~~other~~outstanding ~~party~~indebtedness ansecured ~~advance~~thereby, ~~written~~or ~~notice~~that ~~not~~Jardine toBank ~~renew~~will extend the ~~Hyde~~current ~~Agreement.~~maturity Bydate ~~its~~of ~~terms,~~the onloan ~~May~~or ~~31,~~that ~~2012,~~any ~~the~~such ~~Hyde~~extensions ~~Agreement~~will ~~automatically~~allow ~~renewed~~a sufficient amount of time for anthe ~~additional~~Company ~~one~~to ~~year~~secure ~~term~~the ~~ending~~new ~~May~~real ~~31,~~estate ~~2013~~financing.

OnItem ~~April 1, 2013, the Board Appointees gave written notices to each of Messrs~~2.05 ~~McMurrey~~Costs ~~and~~Associated ~~Hyde~~with ~~that~~Exit the McMurrey Agreement and the Hyde Agreement would not be renewed and would therefore expire on May 31, 2013. Said notices were notices of non-renewal of such employment agreements, and did not terminate Messrs. McMurrey’s or ~~Hyde’s~~Disposal respective employment with the Company. The notices stated, in respective parts, that the Board desires that Messrs. McMurrey and Hyde remain employed by the Company, with the future terms of such employment to be determined after the Company’s Compensation Committee recommends and the Board adopts policies for the employment of executives of the Company. Messrs. McMurrey and Hyde have notified the Company that they dispute the legal effect of the above-described notices, and they believe that their respective employment agreements have automatically renewed for an additional one year term ending May 31, 2014.Activities

~~Bylaw~~The ~~Amendment~~information set forth under Item 2.04 in this Form 8-K is incorporated herein by reference.

~~Effective~~Item ~~as of April 11, 2013, the Board, by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of its members, voted to amend Article II, Section 2~~9.5.01 ~~Special Meetings of the Company’s Bylaws, as amended to date (the “Bylaws”) to read in its entirety as follows:~~Exhibits

~~“Section 2~~None.5. Special Meeting. Special meetings of the Board for any purpose or purposes may be called at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the chief executive officer, the secretary or any two directors then in office.

~~Notice of the time and place of special meetings shall be:~~SIGNATURES

~~(i)~~Pursuant ~~delivered~~to ~~personally~~the requirements of the Securities byExchange ~~hand~~Act of 1934, bythe ~~courier~~Registrant orhas duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by ~~telephone;~~the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

~~(ii)~~Teletouch ~~sent~~Communications, byInc. ~~United States~~By: ~~first-class~~/s/ ~~mail,~~Douglas ~~postage~~E. ~~prepaid;~~Sloan Title: Chief Financial Officer

~~(iii)~~Date: ~~sent~~July by10, ~~facsimile; or~~2013

(iv) sent by electronic mail,

directed to each director at that director's address, telephone number, facsimile number or electronic mail address, as the case may be, as shown on the corporation's records.

If the notice is (i) delivered personally by hand, by courier or by telephone, (ii) sent by facsimile or (iii) sent by electronic mail, it shall be delivered or sent at least twenty-four (24) hours before the time of the holding of the meeting. If the notice is sent by United States mail, it shall be deposited in the United States mail at least four days before the time of the holding of the meeting. Any oral notice may be communicated either to the director or to a person at the office of the director who the person giving notice has reason to believe will promptly communicate such notice to the director. The notice need not specify the place of the meeting if the meeting is to be held at the corporation's principal executive office nor the purpose of the meeting. At any meeting at which every director shall be present, even though without any notice, any business may be transacted.”

The same provision, prior to the foregoing amendment, read, in its entirety, as follows:

“Section 2.5. Special Meeting. Special meetings of the board of directors shall be held whenever called by direction of the chairman or vice-chairman of the board, the president, an executive vice president or two-thirds of the directors then in office.

The secretary shall give notice of each special meeting, stating the date, hour and place thereof, by mailing, telecopying, telegraphing or hand delivering the same, at least forty-eight (48) hours before the meeting, to each director; but such notice may be waived by any director. If mailed, notice shall be deemed to be delivered when deposited in the United States mail or with any private express mail service, postage or delivery fee prepaid. Unless otherwise indicated in the notice thereof, any and all business may be transacted at a special meeting. At any meeting at which every director shall be present, even though without any notice, any business may be transacted.”

Item 9.01 Exhibits

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

Teletouch Communications, Inc. By: /s/ Douglas E. Sloan Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 12, 2013

Filing Compare · TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS INC