UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ______________

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ______________

Commission file number 000-18731

FORLINK SOFTWARE CORPORATION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 98-0398666 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Nevada	98-0398666
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

9F Shenzhou Mansion, No. 31 ZhongGuanCun South Road Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China (Address of principal executive offices) N/A (Zip Code)

9/F Shenzhou Mansion	N/A
No. 31, ZhongGuanCun South Street	(Zip Code)
Haidian District Beijing, 100081 P.R. China
(Address of principal executive offices)

(0086) 10 6811 8866 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class None	Name of each exchange on which registered None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Class Common Stock, $.001 par value

(0086) 10 6811 8866

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of Class

Common Stock, $.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨		Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨		Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, ~~2011~~2012 was $1918,~~395~~192,~~352,~~ based on a closing price of our common stock as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board of $0.3042.

The number of shares of the registrant's common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding on March 2325, ~~2012~~2013 was 4,651,173 shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011

		Page
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
PART I
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	910
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	1011
Item 2.	Properties	11
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	11
Item 4.	~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~Reserved	11
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	11
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	12
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2019
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	20
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	21
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	21
Item 9B.	Other Information	21
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	22
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	23
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	24
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	25
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	25
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	26
SIGNATURES		2728

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Readers of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) are advised that this document may contain statements of historical facts and forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements usually contain the words “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” or similar expressions, and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, (i) projections of revenues, income or loss, earning or loss per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure, and other financial items, (ii) statements of the plans and objectives of the Company or our management or board of directors, including the introduction of new products, or estimates or predictions of actions by customers, suppliers, competitors, or regulatory authorities, (iii) statements of future economic performance, and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying other statements and statements about the Company or our business.

This cautionary note should not be construed as exhaustive or as any admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures made by the Company. Forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control, and, in many cases, we cannot predict what factors will cause results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not undertake, and we specifically disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences, developments, or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of this report.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. (the “Company” or the “Registrant” or “Forlink” or “we” or “us”) provides e-business application solutions and IT outsourcing services in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC” or “China”) through our subsidiaries. We offer clients business information management consulting and planning, application software design, agency and integrated application services for third party software, and other online application services. We also offer the “For”-series of software products.

Our clients are mainly in the telecom and logistics industries or are government agencies.

We have also invested in companies in the logistics, finance, and information technology (IT) industries. The application platforms used by these companies are supported by our integrated application systems, software, and IT outsourcing services.

We are headquartered in Beijing, China and have a branch office in Chengdu, China. Our research and development center is also located in Chengdu.

Company History

We are a Nevada corporation originally incorporated in 1986 as Why Not?, Inc. in Utah. In 1993, we reorganized in Nevada. From 1996 until 1999, we were an unfunded venture in search of a suitable business acquisition or business combination. In 1999, we began our current operations with the acquisition of our major operating subsidiary, Forlink Technologies Co. Ltd. (“FTCL”).

Organization and Subsidiaries

FTCL is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and is our major operating subsidiary located in China. FTCL provides computer software consultancy and engineering services, develops and sells computer software, and sells computer hardware

We have 2 wholly owned subsidiaries, Forlink Technologies (Hong Kong) Limited (“FTHK”) and Beijing Forlink Hua Xin Technology Co. Ltd. (“BFHX”).

FTHK was formed in 2003 in Hong Kong as a limited liability company and serves as a holding company. Because of Hong Kong’s favorable business environment, we can simplify and speed up investment transactions through this subsidiary. FTHK directly imports from overseas companies certain hardware needed for product integration, which allows us to improve our hardware pass-through profit margin.

BFHX was formed in 2003 in the PRC as a limited liability company. Through BFHX, we conduct our telecom value-added services and application integration services for government organizations in China. Our CEO, Mr. Yi He, and FTCL’s administration manager, Mr. Wei Li, are the nominee owners of BFHX, and, as such, hold 70% and 30%, respectively, of the fully paid up capital of BFHX on behalf of the Company as the primary beneficiary. BFHX is considered a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”), and, because we are the primary beneficiary, our consolidated financial statements include BFHX. Upon our request, Mr. Yi He and Mr. Wei Li are required to transfer their ownership in BFHX to us or our designee at any time for the amount of the fully paid registered capital of BFHX.

Following is a diagram illustrating our entire corporate structure:

~~Recent~~ Major Business Developments

On February 8, 2010, we transferred all of our ownership interests in FTCL to BFHX in exchange for FTCL’s 100% fully paid up capital. As a result, FTCL is no longer our direct subsidiary, but BFHX’s wholly owned direct subsidiary.

On August 20, 2010, we sold our 22.73% ownership interests in Guangxi Caexpo International Trade and Logistics Co., Ltd. (“Guangxi Caexpo”), a PRC limited liability company, to Guangxi Sanqi Investment Co., Ltd in exchange for Guangxi Caexpo’s 22.73% fully paid up capital and cash consideration of $3,024,355 (RMB 20,000,000).

On October 8, 2010, we, through BFHX, invested $151,213 (RMB 1,000,000) in Shanghai Shipping Freight Exchange Co., LTD (“SSFE”), a PRC limited liability company, for a 5% equity interest.

Employees

We have ~~177~~203 employees, all of whom are full-time. Approximately ~~123~~137 of these employees are software and information technology specialists engaged in R&D, maintenance and support activities. The remaining employees are sales, marketing, and administrative personnel.

Products and Solutions

Our application solutions are developed on Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) platforms. Our product offerings include:

· For-EAI: For-EAI is an e-business application integration platform based on service-oriented architecture (SOA), including basic components (SSO, workflow, etc.), product components (For-Mail, ForCRM, ForOA, etc.), and mobile-commerce application technologies. All of our industry application solutions are developed on For-EAI. · For-Online: For-Online is a SaaS operating platform designed to deliver application services over the internet. The applications that can be delivered over the internet include many of our flagship products such as ForOA and ForCRM. · For-eMarket: This is a Forlink bulk stock electronic transaction system and is an online exchange system designed to facilitate the matching of vendors and sellers on an electronic trading market. · ForOSS: The Forlink Operation Support System is our solution for Business & Operation Support Systems (BSS/OSS) for e-business carriers and telecom carriers, and consists of software products designed to support existing and expanding business operations for these companies. ForOSS supports billing, customer care, customer relation management, accounting, decision support, and other internal functionalities.

We· ~~released~~ For-~~eTrade V1.0~~Online: ~~and~~ For-~~WMS~~Online ~~V2.0 in January 2011 and SMS Gateway Management Platform V2.0 in November 2011. For-eTrade~~ is ana ~~exchange~~SaaS ~~market~~operating ~~management~~ platform ~~based~~designed onto ~~For-eMarket,~~deliver ~~which~~application isservices ~~designed~~over ~~for~~the ~~spot exchange market~~internet. ~~For-WMS is~~The aapplications ~~subsidiary~~that ~~system~~can ofbe ~~For-Online,~~delivered ~~which~~over ~~meets~~ the ~~needs~~internet ofinclude ~~existing~~many ~~storage~~of ~~system~~our ~~software~~flagship ~~market as the core~~ products ~~and logistics~~such ~~solutions,~~as ~~reduces~~ForOA ~~warehouse management project development costs,~~ and ~~reduces project delivery time~~ForCRM. ~~SMS Gateway Management Platform is an application integration management platform for exchanging SMS in different telecom system providers.~~

~~Distribution~~· ~~Methods~~For-eMarket: ofThis ~~our~~is ~~Products~~a Forlink bulk stock electronic transaction system and ~~Services~~is an online exchange system designed to facilitate the matching of vendors and sellers on an electronic trading market.

We· ~~primarily~~ForOSS: ~~sell~~The ~~our~~Forlink ~~products~~Operation ~~and~~Support ~~services~~System ~~directly~~is to our ~~customers.~~ Wesolution ~~utilize~~for ~~distribution~~Business ~~partners~~& toOperation ~~sell~~Support ~~For~~Systems (BSS/OSS) for e-~~Online~~business carriers and telecom carriers, ~~but~~and ~~this~~consists ~~distribution~~of ~~method~~software ~~accounts~~products designed to support existing and expanding business operations for athese ~~small~~companies. ~~portion~~ForOSS ofsupports ~~our overall~~billing, ~~sales~~customer ~~method~~care, customer relation management, accounting, decision support, and other internal functionalities.

~~Research~~We released For-eTrade V1.0 and ~~Development~~For-WMS V2.0 in January 2011 and SMS Gateway Management Platform V2.0 in November 2011. For-eTrade is an exchange market management platform based on For-eMarket, which is designed for spot exchange market. For-WMS is a subsidiary system of For-Online, which meets the needs of existing storage system software market as the core products and logistics solutions, reduces warehouse management project development costs, and reduces project delivery time. SMS Gateway Management Platform is an application integration management platform for exchanging SMS in different telecom system providers.

WeDistribution ~~are~~Methods ~~committed to continually research, design, and develop information technology solutions and software products that meet the needs~~ of our ~~customers.~~Products ~~We established our Chengdu R&D center in February 1998. We have 51 employees at this R&D center. Our R&D expenses in 2011~~ and ~~2010 were $724,014 and $743,845, respectively.~~Services

6We primarily sell our products and services directly to our customers. We utilize distribution partners to sell For-Online, but this distribution method accounts for a small portion of our overall sales method.

~~Market Opportunities~~6

~~Based~~Research ~~on market research~~ and industry insights, we believe our major markets include the following: industry application integration; industry SaaS (software-as-a-Service); and mobile-commerce applications. We have entered these markets but believe we are in the early stages of taking advantage of the opportunities these markets present to our business.Development

We are committed to continually research, design, and develop information technology solutions and software products that meet the needs of our customers. We established our Chengdu R&D center in February 1998. We have 51 employees at this R&D center. Our ~~Strategy~~R&D expenses in 2012 and 2011 were $935,869 and $723,754, respectively.

~~Our~~Market business objective is to become a leading e-business application solutions and online application services provider in China. Our operating strategy is to use shared core technologies and management systems to identify potential clients, and, through consistent long-term technology supports, build tight strategic partnerships with our clients.Opportunities

~~The~~Based ~~key~~on ~~aspects~~market ofresearch and industry insights, we believe our major ~~strategy~~markets include the following: industry application integration; industry SaaS (software-as-a-Service); and mobile-commerce applications. We have entered these markets but believe we are in the early stages of taking advantage of the opportunities these markets present to our business.

·Our Establish a unified and standard software engineering and project management system to provide assurance for designing high-quality software products and services. As an important milestone, we have achieved Level 3 (Managed Level of Software Process Maturity) of Capability Maturity Model® Integration (CMMI), which was certified by the Software Engineering Institution. · Establish a unified e-business application platform and online services platform. We provide support for e-business application technologies and platforms in different industries, and strive to make available to our clients’ high-quality IT outsourcing services that are cost-effective. To that end, we have made gradual improvements to the power and reliability of our For-Online platform since 2004, culminating with the launch in August 2007 of For-Online 4.0. · Participate in our clients’ e-business application operations to become their strategic partner. We have invested in several companies in the logistics, finance, and IT industries, whose application platforms are supported by our integrated application systems, software, and IT outsourcing services.Strategy

~~Competitive~~Our ~~Strengths~~business objective is to become a leading e-business application solutions and online application services provider in China. Our operating strategy is to use shared core technologies and management systems to identify potential clients, and, through consistent long-term technology supports, build tight strategic partnerships with our clients.

· Professional Software Development and Services System. Our professional software development and services system has substantially strengthened our competitive advantages by ensuring that we are in compliance with all relevant international standards and regulations for business. We passed the ISO9001:2000 international quality assurance system certification and the CMMI Level 3 certification certifying that our software development and services system is in compliance with international standards. We also passed system integration Level 2 certification. · 18 Years of Experience in Industry Applications with Proven Solutions and Products. We have developed core application software products based on standardized application integration technologies. Our customers, strategic partners, and suppliers recognize Forlink as a dependable provider of high quality services, solutions, and products, and frequently recommend us to their business contacts. · Established Customer Relationships. Because of our successful track record, we have established relationships with leading companies in telecom, logistic, finance, government, and other industry verticals in China. Our in-depth understanding of their requirements allows us to successfully deliver customized solutions. Moreover, we have strong customer service and R&D teams based in China, which allow us to respond quickly and efficiently to our clients’ needs. · A Strong and Stable Management Team. The ~~current~~key management team has been with Forlink since we commenced business and includes pioneers of enterprise application integration (EAI) technologies in China. The backgrounds of these individuals offer a breadth of knowledge and experience that covers all aspects ~~relating to the control and development~~ of ~~EAI~~our ~~systems.~~strategy ~~Beyond~~include ~~expertise in~~ the ~~field, their close working relationships with major long-term clients demonstrate a proven ability to sustain and cultivate a successful business.~~following:

7· Establish a unified and standard software engineering and project management system to provide assurance for designing high-quality software products and services. As an important milestone, we have achieved Level 3 (Managed Level of Software Process Maturity) of Capability Maturity Model® Integration (CMMI), which was certified by the Software Engineering Institution.

~~Strategic~~· ~~Partners~~Establish a unified e-business application platform and online services platform. We provide support for e-business application technologies and platforms in different industries, and strive to make available to our clients’ high-quality IT outsourcing services that are cost-effective. To that end, we have made gradual improvements to the power and reliability of our For-Online platform since 2004, culminating with the launch in August 2007 of For-Online 4.0.

~~Strategic~~· ~~partnerships~~Participate ~~are~~in anour ~~essential~~clients’ ~~element~~e-business ofapplication ~~our~~operations ~~business model.~~to Atbecome ~~this~~their ~~time,~~strategic wepartner. We have ~~three~~invested ~~types~~in ofseveral ~~partners~~companies ~~that~~in ~~contribute~~the tologistics, ~~the~~finance, ~~continuing~~and ~~success~~IT ofindustries, whose application platforms are supported by our ~~business~~integrated application systems, software, and IT outsourcing services.

·Competitive Technology Development Partners. These partners provide technology (through licensing or other arrangements) for our solutions or for joint development. Our major technology development partners include HP, Oracle, BEA, IONA, Redhat, and Redflag-linux. · Marketing and Product Partners. These partners provide products and/or technology that are bundled with our solutions and products for marketing purposes. Our marketing and product partners include HP, Intel, IBM, Oracle, Lenovo, and Digital China. · Distribution Partners. These partners distribute our solutions and products to our customers. Our current distribution partner is Beijing Federal.Strengths

~~Competitive~~· ~~Conditions~~Professional Software Development and Services System. Our professional software development and services system has substantially strengthened our competitive advantages by ensuring that we are in compliance with all relevant international standards and regulations for business. We passed the ISO9001:2000 international quality assurance system certification and the CMMI Level 3 certification certifying that our software development and services system is in compliance with international standards. We also passed system integration Level 2 certification.

~~The~~· ~~market~~19 ~~for~~Years ~~information~~of ~~technology~~Experience ~~services~~ in ~~China~~Industry isApplications ~~rapidly growing~~with Proven Solutions and ~~changing~~Products. We ~~compete~~have ~~with~~developed ~~many~~core ~~domestic~~application ~~companies.~~software ~~Our~~products ~~principal~~based ~~competitors~~on instandardized application integration ~~services~~technologies. ~~include AsiaInfo~~Our ~~and~~customers, ~~Digital~~strategic ~~China.~~partners, ~~Our~~and ~~principal~~suppliers ~~competitors~~recognize inForlink ~~the~~as ~~SaaS~~a ~~field~~dependable ~~include~~provider ~~UFSOFT~~of ~~and~~high ~~MYCRM.~~quality ~~All~~services, ofsolutions, ~~these~~and ~~companies~~products, ~~are~~and ~~leading companies~~frequently inrecommend ~~the~~us ~~Chinese~~to ITtheir ~~industry~~business contacts.

~~Government~~· ~~Regulations~~Established Customer Relationships. Because of our successful track record, we have established relationships with leading companies in telecom, logistic, finance, government, and other industry verticals in China. Our in-depth understanding of their requirements allows us to successfully deliver customized solutions. Moreover, we have strong customer service and R&D teams based in China, which allow us to respond quickly and efficiently to our clients’ needs.

· A Strong and Stable Management Team. The ~~Chinese~~current ~~government~~management team has ~~generally~~been ~~encouraged~~with ~~the~~Forlink ~~development~~ since we commenced business and includes pioneers of ~~the~~enterprise ~~information~~application ~~technology~~integration ~~industry,~~(EAI) technologies in China. The backgrounds of these individuals offer a breadth of knowledge and experience that covers all aspects relating to the ~~products~~control and ~~services~~development weof ~~offer~~EAI ~~are~~systems. ~~currently~~Beyond ~~subject~~expertise in the field, their close working relationships with major long-term clients demonstrate a proven ability to ~~PRC~~sustain ~~government~~and ~~regulations~~cultivate a successful business.

The State Council of the PRC promulgated the Regulations on the Protection of Computer Software (the “Software Protection Regulations”) in December 2001, which became effective in January 2002. The Software Protection Regulations were promulgated, among other things, to protect the copyright of computer software in China. According to the Software Protection Regulations, computer software that is independently developed and exists in a physical form or is attached to physical goods will be protected. Such protection, however, does not apply to ideas, mathematical concepts, processing, and operation methods used in the development of software solutions.7

~~Under~~Strategic the Software Protection Regulations, PRC citizens, legal persons, and organizations enjoy copyright protection over computer software they have developed regardless of whether the software has been published. Other developers may enjoy PRC copyright protection over computer software they have developed if such computer software was first distributed in China, or in accordance with a bilateral agreement between China and the developer’s country of citizenship or residence, or in accordance with an international treaty to which China is a party.Partners

~~Under~~Strategic ~~the~~partnerships ~~Software~~are ~~Protection~~an ~~Regulations,~~essential ~~owners~~element of ~~software~~our business ~~copyright~~model. ~~protection~~At ~~enjoy~~this ~~rights of publication~~time, ~~authorship,~~we ~~modification,~~have ~~duplication,~~three ~~issuance,~~types ~~lease,~~of ~~transmission~~partners onthat ~~the~~contribute ~~information network,~~to ~~translation, licensing, and transfer. Software copyright protection takes effect on~~ the ~~day~~continuing ofsuccess ~~completion~~ of ~~the~~our ~~software’s development~~business.

~~For~~· ~~software~~Technology ~~developed~~Development ~~by legal persons and other organizations, software protection extends until December 31 of the 15th year from the date the software solution was first published~~Partners. ~~The~~ ~~Software~~These ~~Protection~~partners ~~Regulations,~~provide ~~however,~~technology ~~will~~(through ~~not~~licensing ~~protect~~or ~~the~~other ~~software~~arrangements) ~~unless~~for itour issolutions ~~published~~or ~~within~~for ~~50 years~~joint ~~of the completion of its~~ development. ~~Licensing~~Our ~~agreements~~major ~~may~~technology ~~allow~~development ~~others~~partners toinclude ~~exploit~~HP, ~~the~~Oracle, ~~software~~BEA, ~~copyright~~IONA, ~~but~~Redhat, ~~exclusive~~and ~~licenses must be in writing~~Redflag-linux. ~~A written contract is also required to transfer any software copyright.~~

~~Civil~~· ~~remedies~~Marketing ~~available under the Software Protection Regulations against infringements of copyright include cessation of the infringement~~ and ~~elimination~~Product ofPartners. ~~its~~These ~~effects,~~partners anprovide ~~apology,~~products and/or ~~compensation for~~technology ~~losses.~~that ~~The~~are ~~administrative~~bundled ~~department~~with ofour ~~copyright~~solutions ~~may~~and ~~order~~products ~~the~~for ~~infringer~~marketing ofpurposes. aOur ~~software~~marketing ~~copyright~~and toproduct ~~stop~~partners ~~all~~include ~~infringing acts~~HP, ~~confiscate~~ ~~illegal gains~~Intel, ~~confiscate and destroy infringing copies~~IBM, ~~and impose a fine on the infringer under certain circumstances. Disputes regarding infringements of software copyright may be settled through mediation~~Oracle, ~~arbitration~~Lenovo, orand ~~the~~Digital ~~PRC courts directly~~China.

8· Distribution Partners. These partners distribute our solutions and products to our customers. Our current distribution partner is Beijing Federal.

~~Dependence~~Competitive onConditions ~~Major Customers~~

~~For~~The ~~the~~market ~~year~~for ~~ended~~information ~~December~~technology ~~31,~~services ~~2011,~~in ~~approximately~~China ~~42%~~is ~~of our~~rapidly ~~total~~growing ~~net~~and ~~revenues~~changing. ~~were~~We ~~generated~~compete bywith ~~two~~many ~~customers,~~domestic ~~Beijing~~companies. ~~Mobile~~Our ~~Communication~~principal ~~Company~~competitors in application integration services include AsiaInfo and HPDigital CoChina., ~~Ltd.~~Our ~~The~~principal ~~loss~~competitors ofin ~~any~~the orSaaS ~~both of~~field ~~these~~include ~~customers~~UFSOFT ~~could~~and ~~have~~MYCRM. aAll ~~material~~of ~~adverse~~these ~~effect~~companies onare ~~our~~leading companies ~~business~~in the Chinese IT industry.

~~During~~Government ~~the~~Regulations year ended December 31, 2011, sales to Beijing Mobile totaled $1,060,918, which accounted for 32% of our total revenue for the period. Since 1998, we have been developing and maintaining Beijing Mobile’s BOSS. BOSS is an integrated software platform, and it is developed in stages to accommodate the carrier’s increasing subscribers and service offerings. We completed phase one in 2002, phrase two in 2006, and phrase three in 2007. We continue to maintain these 3 phases.

~~Patents,~~The ~~Intellectual~~Chinese ~~Property,~~government has generally encouraged the development of the information technology industry, and ~~Licensing~~the products and services we offer are currently subject to PRC government regulations.

WeThe ~~rely~~State onCouncil aof ~~combination~~the ofPRC ~~patents,~~promulgated the Regulations on ~~copyrights,~~the ~~trademarks,~~Protection ~~trade~~of ~~secrets,~~Computer ~~confidentiality~~Software ~~agreements,~~(the ~~and~~“Software ~~other~~Protection ~~contractual~~Regulations”) ~~restrictions~~in ~~with~~December 2001, ~~employees~~which ~~and~~became ~~third~~effective ~~parties~~in toJanuary 2002. ~~establish~~The ~~and~~Software Protection Regulations were promulgated, among other things, to protect ~~our~~the ~~proprietary~~copyright ~~rights~~of computer software in China. ~~Despite~~According ~~these~~to ~~precautions~~the Software Protection Regulations, ~~the~~computer ~~measures~~software wethat ~~undertake~~is ~~may~~independently ~~not~~developed ~~prevent~~and ~~misappropriation~~exists in a physical form or ~~infringement~~is ofattached ~~our~~to ~~proprietary~~physical ~~technology~~goods will be protected. ~~These~~Such ~~measures~~protection, ~~may~~however, does not ~~preclude~~apply ~~competitors~~to ~~from~~ideas, ~~independently~~mathematical concepts, ~~developing~~processing, ~~products with~~and ~~functionality~~operation ormethods ~~features~~used ~~similar~~in tothe ~~our~~development ~~products~~of software solutions.

WeUnder ~~have been issued 61 patents in~~ the ~~PRC~~ ~~that~~Software ~~are~~Protection ~~currently~~Regulations, ~~in force. The normal expiration dates of our issued patents in the~~ PRC ~~range~~citizens, ~~from 2026 to 2030. We also~~legal ~~have~~persons, 2and ~~patent~~organizations ~~applications~~enjoy ~~submitted~~copyright ~~for~~protection ~~review~~over ~~and~~computer ~~approval.~~software Itthey ishave ~~possible~~developed ~~that~~regardless weof ~~will~~whether ~~not~~the ~~receive patents for these applications~~software orhas ~~those~~been ~~that we plan to file in the future~~published. ~~Additionally,~~Other ~~our~~developers ~~issued patents~~ may ~~not~~enjoy ~~adequately~~PRC ~~protect~~copyright ~~our~~protection ~~technology~~over ~~from~~computer ~~infringement or~~software ~~prevent~~they ~~others~~have ~~from~~developed ~~claiming~~if ~~that~~such ~~our products infringe the patents of those third parties. Our failure to protect our intellectual~~computer ~~property~~software ~~could~~was ~~materially~~first ~~harm~~distributed ~~our~~in ~~business. Furthermore~~China, ~~our competitors may independently develop similar~~ or ~~superior technology, duplicate our products, or design around our patents. It is possible that litigation may be necessary~~ in ~~the~~accordance ~~future~~with toa ~~enforce our~~bilateral ~~intellectual~~agreement ~~property~~between ~~rights,~~China ~~to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity~~ and ~~scope of~~ the ~~proprietary~~developer’s ~~rights~~country of ~~others.~~citizenship ~~Litigation~~or ~~could~~residence, ~~result~~or in ~~substantial~~accordance ~~costs~~with ~~and~~an ~~diversion~~international oftreaty ~~resources~~to ~~and~~which ~~could~~China ~~materially~~is ~~harm~~a ~~our business~~party.

~~Some~~Under ofthe ~~our~~Software ~~products~~Protection ~~are~~Regulations, ~~designed~~owners ~~to include~~of software copyright orprotection ~~other~~enjoy ~~intellectual~~rights ~~property~~of ~~licensed~~publication, ~~from~~authorship, ~~third~~modification, ~~parties.~~duplication, ~~While~~issuance, itlease, ~~may~~transmission beon ~~necessary in~~ the ~~future to seek or~~information ~~renew~~network, ~~licenses~~translation, ~~relating to various aspects of our products~~licensing, weand ~~believe that such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms~~transfer. ~~Failure~~Software tocopyright ~~obtain~~protection ~~such~~takes ~~licenses~~effect on ~~commercially~~the ~~reasonable~~day ~~terms~~of ~~could~~completion ~~materially~~of ~~harm~~the ~~our business~~software’s development.

For software developed by legal persons and other organizations, software protection extends until December 31 of the 15^th year from the date the software solution was first published. The Software Protection Regulations, however, will not protect the software unless it is published within 50 years of the completion of its development. Licensing agreements may allow others to exploit the software copyright, but exclusive licenses must be in writing. A written contract is also required to transfer any software copyright.

Civil remedies available under the Software Protection Regulations against infringements of copyright include cessation of the infringement and elimination of its effects, an apology, and compensation for losses. The administrative department of copyright may order the infringer of a software copyright to stop all infringing acts, confiscate illegal gains, confiscate and destroy infringing copies, and impose a fine on the infringer under certain circumstances. Disputes regarding infringements of software copyright may be settled through mediation, arbitration, or the PRC courts directly.

In July 2012, the China State Council issued amendments to the current rules and regulations applicable to China's electronic and online trading markets. The amendments restricted the bulk-commodities forward-trade exchange markets, which has directly led to an overall decrease in the demand for electronic trading software.

In China’s twelfth Five-Year-Plan (2011—2015), the government reiterated the importance of developing and strengthening the IT and telecommunications industry in China. The PRC government’s encouragement of more sophisticated and integrated software systems with enhanced security could prove favorable to the growth of our business. Moreover, the PRC government has stated its support for the convergence of telecom, Internet and cable industries and improvements to the applications of the Internet. These trends may have a positive impact on our business operations.

Dependence on Major Customers

For the year ended December 31, 2012, approximately 44% of our total net revenues were generated by two customers, Beijing Mobile Communication Company and Hebei Steel International Logistics Co., Ltd. The loss of any or both of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, sales to Beijing Mobile totaled $1,001,781, which accounted for 34% of our total revenue for the period. Since 1998, we have been developing and maintaining Beijing Mobile’s BOSS. BOSS is an integrated software platform, and it is developed in stages to accommodate the carrier’s increasing subscribers and service offerings. We completed phase one in 2002, phrase two in 2006, and phrase three in 2007. We continue to maintain these 3 phases.

Patents, Intellectual Property, and Licensing

We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements, and other contractual restrictions with employees and third parties to establish and protect our proprietary rights. Despite these precautions, the measures we undertake may not prevent misappropriation or infringement of our proprietary technology. These measures may not preclude competitors from independently developing products with functionality or features similar to our products.

We have been issued 61 patents in the PRC that are currently in force. The normal expiration dates of our issued patents in the PRC range from 2026 to 2030. We also have 2 patent applications submitted for review and approval. It is possible that we will not receive patents for these applications or those that we plan to file in the future. Additionally, our issued patents may not adequately protect our technology from infringement or prevent others from claiming that our products infringe the patents of those third parties. Our failure to protect our intellectual property could materially harm our business. Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop similar or superior technology, duplicate our products, or design around our patents. It is possible that litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could materially harm our business.

Some of our products are designed to include software or other intellectual property licensed from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of our products, we believe that such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Failure to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms could materially harm our business.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information in this Form 10-K, the following factors should be considered in evaluating our business and our future prospects:

POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC POLICIES OF THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT COULD AFFECT OUR INDUSTRY IN GENERAL AND OUR COMPETITIVE POSITION IN PARTICULAR

Since the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the Communist Party has been the governing political party in the PRC. The highest bodies of leadership are the Politburo of the Communist Party, the Central Committee, and the National People's Congress. The State Council, which is the highest institution of government administration, reports to the National People's Congress and has under its supervision various commissions, agencies, and ministries, including The Ministry of Information Industry and the telecommunications regulatory body of the Chinese government. Since the late 1970s, the Chinese government has been reforming the Chinese economic system. Although we believe that economic reforms and the macroeconomic measures adopted by the Chinese government have had and will continue to have a positive effect on economic development in China, there can be no assurance that the economic reform strategy will not from time to time be modified or revised. Such modifications or revisions, if any, could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China and investment in the internet and telecommunications industries in China. Such developments could reduce, perhaps significantly, the demand for our products and services. There is no guarantee that the Chinese government will not impose other economic or regulatory controls that would have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, changes in political, economic, and social conditions in China, adjustments in policies of the Chinese government, or changes in laws and regulations could affect our industry in general and our competitive position in particular.

THE GROWTH OF OUR BUSINESS IS DEPENDENT ON GOVERNMENT TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUDGETARY POLICY, PARTICULARLY THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO SUSTAIN THE GROWTH OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IN CHINA

Virtually all of our large customers are directly or indirectly owned or controlled by the government of China. Accordingly, their business strategies, capital expenditure budgets, and spending plans are largely decided in accordance with government policies, which, in turn, are determined on a centralized basis at the highest level by the National Development and Reform Commission of China. As a result, the growth of our business is heavily dependent on government policies for telecommunications and internet infrastructure. Insufficient government allocation of funds to sustain the growth of China's telecommunications industries in the future could reduce the demand for our products and services and have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow our business.

CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK DUE TO FLUCTUATIONS IN THE EXCHANGE RATE BETWEEN U.S. DOLLARS AND RENMINBI

The functional currency of our operations is Renminbi (“RMB”), and our financial statements are expressed in U.S. dollars (“USD”). As a result, we are subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations between these currencies. In July 2005, the Chinese government announced that it would no longer peg its currency exclusively to USD but instead would switch to a managed floating exchange rate based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies determined by the People’s Bank of China. The exchange rate of RMB to USD changed from RMB 86.2830 in late December 2011 to RMB 7.8229 in late December ~~2006~~2012. Any future devaluation of the RMB against the USD may have an adverse effect on our reported net income. As our operations are conducted in the PRC, substantially all our revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities are denominated in RMB. In general, our exposure to foreign exchange risks should be limited. The value in our shares, however, may be affected by the foreign exchange rate between the USD and the RMB because the value of our business is effectively denominated in RMB while our shares are traded in USD. Furthermore, a decline in the value of RMB could reduce the USD equivalent of the value of the earnings from, and our investment in, our subsidiaries in the PRC, while an increase in the value of the RMB may require us to exchange more USD into RMB to meet the working capital requirements of our subsidiaries in China. Depreciation of the value of the USD will also reduce the value of the cash we hold in USD, which we may use for purposes of future acquisitions or other business expansion. We actively monitor our exposure to these risks and adjust our cash position in RMB and USD when we believe such adjustments will reduce risks.

GENERAL RISK OF FINANCING

In order for the Company to meet its continuing cash requirements and to successfully implement its growth strategy, we will need to rely on increased future revenues or will require additional financing. In the event additional financing is required, no assurances can be given that such financing will be available in the amount required or, if available, that it can be on terms satisfactory to the Company.

RISK OF SLOW CHINESE ECONOMIC RECOVERY

The Chinese economy is continuing the recovery from the recent global crisis in the financial services and credit markets, which resulted in significant volatility and dislocation in the global capital markets and particularly in China’s growth rate. The road to recovery remains uncertain and may be slow, and the impact of a slow economic recovery in China could result in slowing growth for China’s major telecommunications carriers, which are our major customers, as well as slowing growth for enterprises and government entities that buy our IT software products and services. Any such adverse conditions for our customers could reduce their demand for our software and services and therefore reduce our revenues.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

10Item 2. Properties

~~Item~~We 2have an office in Chengdu, PRC, which houses FTCD. ~~Properties~~The building is located at B-16B, Wangfujing Business Mansion, No.5 Huaxingzheng Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PRC.

We ~~have~~rent an office inspace ~~Chengdu,~~of ~~PRC~~approximately 2,027 ~~which~~square ~~houses~~meters ~~FTCD.~~that serves ~~The~~as ~~building is~~our ~~located~~headquarters at ~~B-16B,~~9/F ~~Wangfujing~~Shenzhou ~~Business~~ Mansion, No.5 ~~Huaxingzheng~~31 Zhongguancun Street, ~~Chengdu~~Haidian District, ~~Sichuan~~Beijing, ~~Province~~China. We have a renewable lease agreement for these premises until March 29, 2011. Both the Company and the landlord intend to renew the lease. The parties ~~PRC~~are in the process of negotiating a new lease agreement and the Company anticipates a new lease by April 2013. The total rent from March 30, 2011 to March 29, 2013 is $864,764 (RMB 5,539,680).

WeIn ~~rent office space of approximately 2~~addition,~~027~~ ~~square~~we ~~meters~~have ~~that serves~~one asregional ~~our~~field ~~headquarters~~support atoffice ~~9/F~~in ~~Shenzhou Mansion~~Chengdu, No PRC. 31The ~~Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China. We have a renewable~~ lease ~~agreement~~term for ~~these~~this ~~premises~~office ~~until March 29, 2011. The total rent from March 30, 2011 to March 29, 2013~~ is ~~$864,764~~as ~~(RMB 5,539,680).~~follow:

In addition, we have one regional field support office in Chengdu, PRC. The lease term for this office is as follow:

Name

Rent Period

Size (in m²)

Annual Rent

Chengdu R&D Center

11/22/2012 – 11/21/2013

602.59

35,927 (RMB 248,400)

Name		Rent Period		Size (in m2)		Annual Rent
Chengdu R&D Center		11/22/2011 – 11/21/2012		602.59		$35,927 (RMB 248,400)

We believe that our current facilities occupied are adequate to meet our current operational needs.

WeItem ~~believe~~3. ~~that~~Legal ~~our current facilities occupied are adequate to meet our current operational needs.~~Proceedings

~~Item 3~~None. ~~Legal Proceedings~~

~~None.~~PART II

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, is quoted on the ~~Over-the-Counter~~OTCQB ~~Bulletin Board~~ system under the symbol “FLSW.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid prices for our common stock for each quarterly period indicated, as reported by the ~~OTCBB~~OTC Markets. Quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown, or commissions, and may not represent actual trades.

Common Stock

Quarter Ended	High Bid		Low Bid
December 31, 2012	$	0.18	$	0.01
September 30, 2012	$	0.15	$	0.0115
June 30, 2012	$	0.20	$	0.027
March 31, 2012	$	0.35	$	0.20
December 31, 2011		—		—
September 30, 2011		—		—
June 30, 2011		—		—
March 31, 2011	$	0.00	$	0.00
December 31, 2010		—		—
September 30, 2010	$	0.14	$	0.00
June 30, 2010	$	0.35	$	0.03
March 31, 2010	$	0.25	$	0.13

Holders

As of March 2325, ~~2012~~2013, we have ~~486~~471 stockholders of record.

Dividends

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to do so in the foreseeable future. We retain any earnings for the operation and expansion of our business.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Please see the discussion in Item 12 titled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” below.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-K should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Form 10-K. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements for any reason. Please see the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information” section above for more information regarding forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a professional software development and technology service company. We are also a leading provider of industry e-business application solutions in China. Our main business is providing application development and maintenance services for companies in the telecom, logistics, and government industries. We are inputting our efforts to develop our new products and services on on-line trading platform, SaaS platform (For-Online), the internet of things (“IOT”) application solutions, and mobile business application solutions.

In addition to our core business, we believe that there are opportunities for us to expand into new areas and to grow our business not only internally but through acquisitions and investments. Please see the “Business” section above for more information about our operations and recent developments to our business.

~~Revenues~~12

Our business includes the Forlink branded "For-"series software system sales such as ForOSS, ForRMS, and For-Mail and their copyright licensing, and For-series related system integration, which consists of hardware sales and other related services rendered to customers. The following table shows our revenue breakdown by business line:Revenues

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010
Sales of For-series software	$	3,287,638		$	4,624,918
as a percentage of net sales		96	%		92	%
For-series related system integration	$	120,927		$	402,789
as a percentage of net sales		4	%		8	%

AsGenerally, ~~indicated~~we inoffer ~~the~~our ~~foregoing~~products ~~table,~~and ~~sales~~services ofto ~~For-series~~our ~~software~~customers ason a ~~percentage of net sales increased from 92% in 2010 to 96% in 2011 while sales of For~~total-~~series~~solutions ~~related system integration as a percentage of net sales decreased from 8% in 2010 to 4% in 2011~~basis. ~~The~~Most ~~decrease in our sales~~ of ~~system~~the ~~integration was attributable to a decrease in customer sales~~ contracts ~~due~~we toundertake ~~lower~~for ~~customer~~our ~~demand.~~customers ~~Our~~include ~~strategy,~~revenue ~~however,~~from ishardware toand ~~increase~~ software sales as ~~such~~and ~~sales~~professional ~~carry higher profit margins~~services.

12Sources of Revenue

~~Generally,~~· weHardware ~~offer~~Revenue: ~~our~~Revenues ~~products~~from ~~and~~sales ~~services~~of toproducts ~~our~~are ~~customers on~~mainly aderived ~~total-solutions~~from ~~basis.~~sales ~~Most~~ of ~~the~~hardware. ~~contracts~~Normally, wethe ~~undertake~~hardware ~~for~~that ~~our~~we ~~customers~~procure ~~include~~is ~~revenue~~in ~~from~~connection ~~hardware~~with ~~and~~total-solutions ~~software~~basis ~~sales and~~system ~~professional~~integration ~~services~~contracts.

~~Sources~~· ofService Revenue: Service revenue consists of revenue for the professional services we provide to our customers for network planning, design and systems integration, software development, modification and installation, and related training services.

· Hardware Revenue: Revenues from sales of products are mainly derived from sales of hardware. Normally, the hardware that we procure is in connection with total-solutions basis system integration contracts. · Service Revenue: Service revenue consists of revenue for the professional services we provide to our customers for network planning, design and systems integration, software development, modification and installation, and related training services. · Software License Revenue: We generate revenue in the form of fees received from customers to whom we issue licenses for the use of our software products over an agreed period of time.

Costs of Revenue

Our costs of revenue include hardware costs, software-related costs, and compensation and travel expenses for the professionals involved with relevant projects. Hardware costs consist primarily of third-party hardware costs. We recognize hardware costs in full upon delivery of the hardware to our customers. Software-related costs consist primarily of packaging and written manual expenses for our proprietary software products and software license fees paid to third-party software providers for the right to sublicense their products to our customers as part of our solutions offerings. The costs associated with designing and modifying our proprietary software are classified as research and development expenses as such costs are incurred.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses are comprised of selling expenses, research and development expenses, and general and administrative expenses.

Selling expenses include compensation expenses for employees in our sales and marketing departments, third party advertising expenses, and sales commissions and sales agency fees.

Research and development expenses relate to the development of new software and the modification of existing software. We expense such costs as they are incurred.

Taxes

According to relevant PRC tax rules and regulations, FTCL and BFHX, both of which are recognized as New Technology Enterprises operating within a New and High Technology Development Zone, are entitled to an Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”) rate of 15%.

Pursuant to approval documents dated September 23, 1999 and August 2, 2000 issued by the Beijing Tax Bureau and the State Tax Bureau respectively, FTCL received full exemption from the EIT for fiscal years 1999 through 2002 and a 50% EIT reduction at the rate of 7.5% for fiscal years 2003 through 2005. As of December, 31, ~~2011~~2012, FTCL was entitled to an EIT rate of 15%.

Pursuant to an approval document dated January 19, 2004 issued by the State Tax Bureau, BFHX received full exemption from EIT for fiscal years 2004 through 2006. As of December 31, 2011, BFHX was entitled to an EIT rate of 25%.13

~~The~~Pursuant ~~Hong~~to ~~Kong~~an ~~profits~~approval ~~tax~~document isdated ~~calculated~~January at19, ~~16.5%~~2004 onissued by the ~~estimated assessable~~State ~~profits~~Tax ofBureau, ~~FTHK.~~BFHX ~~The~~received ~~EIT~~full ~~rates~~exemption ~~for~~from ~~FTCD~~EIT ~~and NNBCE are 25%. No provision~~ for ~~EIT~~fiscal ~~and~~years ~~Hong~~2004 ~~Kong~~through ~~profits~~2006. ~~tax~~As ~~were~~of ~~made for~~December ~~FTCL~~31, ~~BFHX~~2012, ~~FTCD,~~BFHX was ~~FTGX,~~entitled ~~NNBCE,~~to ~~and~~an ~~FTHK~~EIT asrate ~~they~~of ~~did not have taxable income during relevant periods~~25%.

13The Hong Kong profits tax is calculated at 16.5% on the estimated assessable profits of FTHK. The EIT rates for FTCD and NNBCE are 25%. No provision for EIT and Hong Kong profits tax were made for FTCL, BFHX, FTCD, FTGX, NNBCE, and FTHK as they did not have taxable income during relevant periods.

Revenue from the sale of hardware procured in China together with the related system integration is subject to a 17% value added tax (“VAT”). But companies that develop their own software and have the software registered are generally entitled to a VAT refund. If the net amount of the VAT payable exceeds 3% of software sales, the excess portion of the VAT is refundable upon our application to the tax authority. This policy is effective until ~~2012~~2013. Changes in Chinese tax laws may adversely affect our future operations.

Foreign Exchange

Our functional currency is United States Dollars (“USD”), and our financial records are maintained, and the financial statements prepared, in USD. The functional currency of FTHK is Hong Kong Dollars (“HKD”), and the financial records are maintained, and the financial statements prepared, in HKD. The functional currency of FTCL, BFHX, FTGX, and FTCD is Renminbi (“RMB”), and the financial records are maintained, and the financial statements prepared, in RMB.

Foreign currency transactions during the year are translated into each company’s denominated currency at the exchange rates at the transaction dates. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statement of operations. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated into each company’s denominated currency at year-end exchange rates. All exchange differences are dealt with in the consolidated statements of operations.

The financial statements of our operations based outside of the United States have been translated into USD in accordance with ASC 830. Management has determined that the functional currency for each of our foreign operations is its applicable local currency. When translating functional currency financial statements into USD, year-end exchange rates are applied to the consolidated balance sheets while average period rates are applied to consolidated statements of operations. Translation gains and losses are recorded in translation reserve as a component of stockholders’ equity.

The value of the RMB is subject to changes in China’s central government policies and to international economic and political developments affecting supply and demand in the China Foreign Exchange Trading System market. Since 1994, the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies, including USD, has been based on rates set by the People’s Bank of China, which are set daily based on the previous day’s interbank foreign exchange market rates and current exchange rates on the world financial markets. Since 1994, the official exchange rate generally has been stable. In July 2005, the Chinese government announced that it will no longer peg its currency exclusively to USD but will switch to a managed floating exchange rate based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies.

The following table shows the exchange rates and the weighted average rates for the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011:

		~~USD~~	USD	~~HKD~~	HKD	~~RMB~~	RMB
Exchange rate as of December 31,	~~2011~~2012		1		7.8075		6.30
	2010		1		7.82		6.61
	2011		1		7.77		6.35
Weighted average rates ruling for	~~2011~~2012		1		7.8075		6.4031
	2010		1		7.80		6.69
	2011		1		7.80		6.40

~~Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates~~14

WeCritical ~~prepare~~Accounting ~~our~~Policies consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenues and cost of revenues under customer contracts, bad debts, income taxes, investment in affiliate, long-lived assets and goodwill. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, we believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.Estimates

14We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenues and cost of revenues under customer contracts, bad debts, income taxes, investment in affiliate, long-lived assets and goodwill. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, we believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

We generally provide services under multiple element arrangements, which include software license fees, hardware and software sales, provision of system integration services including consulting, implementation, and software maintenance. We evaluate revenue recognition on a contract-by-contract basis as the terms of each arrangement vary. The evaluation of the contractual arrangements often requires judgments and estimates that affect the timing of revenue recognized in the statements of operations. Specifically, we may be required to make judgments about:

· whether the fees associated with our products and services are fixed or determinable; · whether collection of our fees is reasonably assured; · whether professional services are essential to the functionality of the related software product; · whether we have the ability to make reasonably dependable estimates in the application of the percentage-of-completion method; and · whether we have verifiable objective evidence of fair value for our products and services.

We· ~~recognize~~whether ~~revenues~~collection ~~in accordance with the provisions~~ of ~~ASC 985,~~our ~~“Software~~fees ~~Revenue Recognition.” ASC 985 requires among other matters, that there be a signed contract evidencing an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee~~ is ~~fixed~~reasonably ~~or determinable, and collectability is probable.~~assured;

~~Software~~· ~~license~~whether ~~revenue~~professional isservices ~~recognized~~are ~~over~~essential ~~the~~to ~~accounting periods contained in~~ the ~~terms~~functionality of the ~~relevant~~related ~~agreements, commencing upon the delivery of the~~ software ~~provided that (1) there is evidence of an arrangement, (2) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (3) collection of the fee is considered probable.~~product;

~~Revenue~~· ~~from~~whether ~~non-software, multiple-element arrangements is recognized in accordance with ASC 605-25, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” Under ASC 605-25,~~ we ~~recognize revenue~~have ~~from~~ the ~~multiple-deliverables~~ability ~~that has value~~ to ~~the~~make ~~customer~~reasonably ondependable aestimates ~~stand-alone basis. Deliverables~~ in anthe ~~arrangement~~application ~~that do~~of ~~not meet~~ the ~~separation criteria in ASC 605~~percentage-~~25 are treated as one unit~~ of-completion ~~accounting~~method; ~~for purposes of revenue recognition.~~and

In· ~~the~~whether ~~case~~we ofhave ~~maintenance~~verifiable ~~revenues, vendor-specific~~ objective evidence, ~~or VSOE,~~ of fair value isfor ~~based~~our onproducts ~~substantive renewal prices,~~ and ~~the revenues are recognized ratably over the maintenance period~~services.

InWe recognize revenues in accordance with the ~~case~~provisions of ~~consulting~~ASC 985, ~~and~~“Software ~~implementation~~Revenue ~~services~~Recognition.” ~~revenues~~ASC 985 requires among other matters, ~~where~~ ~~VSOE~~that isthere ~~based~~be ona ~~prices~~signed ~~from~~contract ~~stand-alone~~evidencing an ~~sale~~arrangement ~~transactions~~exists, ~~the~~delivery ~~revenues~~has ~~are~~occurred, ~~recognized~~the asfee ~~services~~is ~~that~~fixed ~~are~~or ~~performed~~determinable, ~~pursuant to~~and ~~ASC~~collectability ~~985-605-25~~is probable.

~~For~~Software ~~hardware~~license ~~transactions~~revenue ~~where software~~ is ~~incidental, we do not~~recognized ~~apply~~over ~~separate~~the accounting ~~guidance~~periods contained toin the ~~hardware~~terms ~~and~~of ~~software elements. We apply~~ the ~~provisions~~relevant ofagreements, ~~ASC~~commencing ~~985-605-15. Per~~upon ~~ASC~~the ~~985-605-15,~~delivery ifof the software isprovided ~~considered~~that ~~non-essential~~(1) tothere ~~the~~is ~~functionality~~ evidence of ~~the~~an ~~hardware~~arrangement, ~~then~~(2) the ~~hardware~~fee is ~~not considered~~fixed ~~“software~~or ~~related”~~determinable, and is(3) ~~excluded~~collection ~~from~~of the ~~scope~~fee ~~of ASC 985-605-15. Such sale of computer hardware~~ is ~~recognized as~~considered ~~revenue on the transfer of risks and rewards of ownership, which generally coincides with the time when the goods are delivered to customers and title has passed~~probable.

~~Remote~~Revenue ~~hosting~~from ~~services~~non-software, ~~where~~multiple-element ~~VSOE~~arrangements is ~~based upon consistent~~ ~~pricing~~recognized ~~charged~~in toaccordance ~~customers~~with ~~based~~ASC on605-25, ~~volumes~~“Revenue ~~and~~Arrangements ~~performance~~with ~~requirements~~Multiple onDeliverables.” aUnder ~~stand~~ASC 605-~~alone~~25, ~~basis~~we ~~and substantive renewal terms,~~recognize ~~are~~revenue ~~recognized~~from ~~ratably over~~ the ~~contract~~multiple-deliverables ~~term~~that ashas ~~the~~value ~~services~~to ~~are performed. The remote hosting arrangements generally require~~ the ~~Company~~customer toon ~~perform one-time set-up activities and include~~ a ~~one~~stand-~~time~~alone ~~set-up fee~~basis. ~~This~~Deliverables ~~one-time~~in ~~set-up~~an ~~fee~~arrangement ~~is generally paid~~that bydo ~~the~~not ~~customer~~meet at the ~~time~~separation ~~the~~criteria ~~contract~~in isASC ~~executed. We have determined that these set~~605-up25 ~~activities~~are dotreated ~~not~~as ~~constitute~~one ~~a separate~~ unit of accounting, ~~and~~for ~~accordingly,~~purposes ~~the related set-up fees are recognized protractedly over the term~~ of ~~the~~revenue ~~contract~~recognition.

WeIn ~~are considering~~ the ~~applicability~~case of ~~ASC~~maintenance ~~985-605-55~~revenues, ~~“Application~~vendor-specific objective ofevidence, ~~AICPA~~or ~~Statement~~VSOE, of ~~SOP~~fair ~~97-2~~value tois ~~Arrangements~~based ~~That Include the Right to Use Software Stored~~ on ~~Another~~substantive ~~Entity’s~~renewal ~~Hardware~~prices,~~” to~~ ~~the~~and ~~hosting services arrangements on a contract-by-contract basis. If we determine that~~ the ~~customer~~revenues ~~does~~are ~~not~~recognized ~~have~~ratably ~~the~~over ~~contractual right to take possession of our software at any time during~~ the ~~hosting period without significant penalty, ASC 985-605 would not~~maintenance ~~apply to these contracts in accordance with ASC 985-605-55~~period.

15In the case of consulting and implementation services revenues, where VSOE is based on prices from stand-alone sale transactions, the revenues are recognized as services that are performed pursuant to ASC 985-605-25.

~~Income~~For ~~Taxes~~hardware transactions where software is incidental, we do not apply separate accounting guidance to the hardware and software elements. We apply the provisions of ASC 985-605-15. Per ASC 985-605-15, if the software is considered non-essential to the functionality of the hardware, then the hardware is not considered “software related” and is excluded from the scope of ASC 985-605-15. Such sale of computer hardware is recognized as revenue on the transfer of risks and rewards of ownership, which generally coincides with the time when the goods are delivered to customers and title has passed.

WeRemote ~~account~~hosting ~~for~~services, ~~income~~where ~~taxes~~VSOE inis ~~accordance~~based ~~with~~upon ~~ASC~~consistent pricing ~~740~~charged ~~“Accounting for~~to ~~Income~~customers ~~Taxes.”~~based ~~Under~~on ~~ASC~~volumes ~~740,~~and ~~deferred~~performance ~~tax~~requirements ~~liabilities~~on ora ~~assets~~stand-alone atbasis and substantive renewal terms, are recognized ratably over the ~~end~~contract ofterm ~~each~~as ~~period~~the services are ~~determined~~performed. ~~using~~The ~~the~~remote ~~tax~~hosting arrangements generally require ~~rate~~the ~~expected~~Company to beperform inone-time ~~effect~~set-up ~~when~~activities ~~taxes~~and ~~are~~include ~~actually~~a ~~paid~~one-time orset-up ~~recovered~~fee. ~~Valuation~~This ~~allowances~~one-time ~~are~~set-up ~~established~~fee ~~when~~is itgenerally paid by the customer at the time the contract is ~~more~~executed. ~~likely than~~We ~~not~~have determined that ~~some~~these orset-up ~~all~~activities do not constitute a separate unit of accounting, and accordingly, the ~~deferred~~related ~~tax~~set-up ~~assets~~fees ~~not~~are berecognized ~~realized~~protractedly over the term of the contract.

In July 2006, the FASB ASC 740-10-25, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” This interpretation provides guidance for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions, as defined in ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” ASC 740-10-25 prescribes a threshold condition that a tax position must meet for any of the benefit of the uncertain tax position to be recognized in the financial statements. Guidance is also provided regarding derecognition, classification, and disclosure of these uncertain tax positions.15

~~Allowance~~We ~~for~~are ~~Doubtful~~considering ~~Accounts~~the applicability of ASC 985-605-55, “Application of AICPA Statement of SOP 97-2 to Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware,” to the hosting services arrangements on a contract-by-contract basis. If we determine that the customer does not have the contractual right to take possession of our software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty, ASC 985-605 would not apply to these contracts in accordance with ASC 985-605-55.

WeIncome record an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts that the Company believes to be uncollectible. We have a limited number of customers with individually large amounts due at any given balance sheet date. Any unanticipated change in one of those customers’ credit worthiness or other matters affecting the collectability of amounts due from such customers could have a material effect on the results of operations in the period in which such changes or events occur. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.Taxes

~~Recent~~We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 “Accounting for ~~Pronouncements~~Income Taxes.” Under ASC 740, deferred tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets not be realized.

In ~~May~~July ~~2011~~2006, the FASB ~~issued~~ASC an740-10-25, ~~authoritative~~“Accounting for ~~pronouncement~~Uncertainty onin ~~fair~~Income ~~value~~Taxes-an ~~measurement~~interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” This ~~The~~interpretation provides guidance for isrecognizing ~~the~~and ~~result~~measuring ofuncertain ~~joint~~tax ~~efforts~~positions, byas ~~the~~defined ~~FASB~~in ~~and~~ASC ~~the~~740, ~~International~~ “Accounting ~~Standards~~ ~~Board~~for toIncome ~~develop~~Taxes.” ASC 740-10-25 prescribes a ~~single,~~threshold ~~converged~~condition ~~fair~~that ~~value~~a ~~framework.~~tax ~~The~~position ~~guidance~~must ismeet ~~largely~~for ~~consistent~~any ~~with~~of ~~existing~~the ~~fair~~benefit ~~value measurement~~of ~~principles~~the inuncertain ~~GAAP.~~tax ~~The~~position ~~guidance~~to ~~expands~~be recognized in the ~~existing~~financial ~~disclosure~~statements. ~~requirements~~Guidance ~~for~~is ~~fair~~also ~~value~~provided ~~measurements~~regarding derecognition, classification, and ~~makes other~~disclosure ~~amendments,~~of ~~mainly~~these ~~including:~~uncertain tax positions.

·Allowance ~~Highest-and-best-use and valuation-premise concepts~~ for ~~nonfinancial~~Doubtful ~~assets—the guidance indicates that the highest-and-best-use and valuation-premise concepts only apply to measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets.~~Accounts

·We ~~Application~~record toan ~~financial~~allowance ~~assets~~for ~~and~~doubtful ~~financial~~accounts ~~liabilities~~based ~~with~~on ~~offsetting~~specifically identified ~~positions~~amounts inthat ~~market~~the ~~risks~~Company orbelieves ~~counterparty~~to ~~credit~~be ~~risk—the~~uncollectible. ~~guidance~~We ~~permits~~have ana ~~exception~~limited tonumber ~~fair~~of ~~value~~customers ~~measurement~~with ~~principles~~individually ~~for~~large amounts ~~financial~~due ~~assets~~at ~~and~~any ~~financial~~given ~~liabilities~~balance ~~(and~~sheet ~~derivatives)~~date. ~~with~~Any ~~offsetting~~unanticipated ~~positions~~change in ~~market~~one ~~risks~~of orthose ~~counterparty~~customers’ credit ~~risk~~worthiness ~~when~~or ~~several~~other matters ~~criteria~~affecting ~~are~~the ~~met.~~collectability ~~When~~of ~~the~~amounts ~~criteria~~due ~~are~~from ~~met,~~such ancustomers ~~entity~~could ~~can~~have ~~measure~~a ~~the~~material ~~fair~~effect ~~value~~on the results of operations in the ~~net~~period ~~risk~~in ~~position~~which such changes or events occur. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.

·Recent ~~Premiums~~Accounting orPronouncements discounts in fair value measure—the guidance provides that premiums or discounts that reflect size as a characteristic of the reporting entity’s holding (specifically, a blockage factor that adjusts the quoted price of an asset or a liability because the market’s normal daily trading volume is not sufficient to absorb the quantity held by the entity) rather than as a characteristic of the asset or liability (for example, a control premium when measuring the fair value of a controlling interest) are not permitted in a fair value measurement.

·In ~~Fair~~May ~~value~~2011, ofthe anFASB ~~instrument~~issued ~~classified~~ASU 2011-04 into provide a ~~reporting~~consistent definition ~~entity’s~~of ~~stockholders’~~fair ~~equity—~~value (“FV”) and ensure that the ~~guidance~~FV ~~prescribes~~measurement aand ~~model~~disclosure ~~for~~requirements ~~measuring~~are similar between accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~fair~~United ~~value~~States of anAmerica ~~instrument~~(“US ~~classified~~GAAP”) inand ~~stockholders’~~IFRS. ~~equity;~~ASU ~~this~~2011-04 ~~model~~changes certain isFV ~~consistent~~measurement ~~with~~principles and enhances the ~~guidance~~disclosure onrequirements ~~measuring~~particularly ~~the~~for ~~fair~~Level ~~value~~3 FV measurements. The adoption of ~~liabilities~~ASU 2011-04 did not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

·In ~~Disclosures~~July ~~about~~2012, the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement related to testing indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, for impairment. Under the guidance, an entity testing an indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment has the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value ~~measurements—~~of the asset. If the entity determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is not more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) impaired, the entity would not need to calculate the fair value of the asset. The guidance ~~expands~~does ~~disclosure~~not ~~requirements~~revise the requirement to test indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment. In addition, ~~particularly~~the guidance does not amend the requirement to test these assets for ~~Level~~impairment 3between ~~inputs~~annual tests if there is a change in events or circumstances; however, it does revise the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider in interim periods. ~~Required~~The ~~disclosures~~guidance ~~include:~~was effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.

~~(i)~~In ~~For~~February, ~~fair~~2013, ~~value~~the ~~measurements~~FASB ~~categorized~~issued inASU ~~Level~~2013-02 3that addresses the reporting of ~~the~~reclassifications ~~fair~~out ~~value~~of ~~hierarchy:~~accumulated ~~(1)~~other acomprehensive ~~quantitative~~income. ~~disclosure~~This ofASU ~~the~~clarifies ~~unobservable~~FASB ~~inputs~~Codification Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, and ~~assumptions~~requires ~~used~~an inentity to report the ~~measurement,~~effect ~~(2)~~of asignificant ~~description~~reclassifications out of ~~the~~accumulated ~~valuation~~other ~~process~~comprehensive income inon ~~place~~the ~~(e.g.,~~net ~~how~~income ~~the~~line ~~entity~~items ~~decides~~affected ~~its~~if ~~valuation~~the ~~policies~~amount ~~and~~is ~~procedures,~~required asunder ~~well~~US asGAAP ~~changes~~to be reclassified in its ~~analyses~~entirety ofto ~~fair~~net income ~~value~~in ~~measurements,~~the ~~from~~same reporting period. Amounts not required to ~~period),~~be ~~and~~reclassified ~~(3)~~in atheir ~~narrative~~entirety ~~description~~to ofnet income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. These amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. Because the ~~sensitivity~~only ofsignificant amounts in the ~~fair~~Company’s ~~value~~accumulated other comprehensive income relate to ~~changes~~foreign inexchange ~~unobservable~~translations, ~~inputs~~the ~~and~~Company ~~interrelationships~~does ~~between~~not ~~those~~expect ~~inputs~~significant impact by this standard in the foreseeable future.

~~(ii)~~Other ~~The~~accounting ~~level~~standards inthat have been issued or proposed by the ~~fair~~FASB ~~value~~or ~~hierarchy~~other ofstandards-setting ~~items~~bodies that ~~are~~do not ~~measured~~require atadoption ~~fair~~until ~~value~~a infuture ~~the~~date ~~statement~~are ofnot ~~financial~~expected ~~position~~to ~~but~~have ~~whose~~a ~~fair~~significant impact ~~value~~on ~~must~~the beCompany’s ~~disclosed~~consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

~~The~~Consolidated ~~guidance~~Results is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for public entities. Early application by public entities is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ~~this guidance to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.~~Operations

InYear ~~June~~Ended ~~2011,~~December ~~the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income~~31, ~~the~~2012 ~~components~~Compared of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to ~~present~~Year ~~each~~Ended component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The guidance does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The guidance should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December ~~15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.~~ ~~In December 2011~~31, the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement related to deferral of the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This guidance allows the FASB to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the FASB is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before the pronouncement updated was issued in June 2011~~. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In September 2011, the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement related to testing goodwill for impairment.~~ The ~~guidance~~following istable ~~intended~~sets toforth simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. The guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that the ~~fair~~results ~~value~~ of aour ~~reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a~~operations ~~basis~~ for ~~determining whether it is necessary to perform~~ the ~~two-step~~periods goodwill impairment test. The guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011 if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.indicated:

In December 2011, the FASB has issued an authoritative pronouncement related to Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The guidance requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. We are in the process of evaluating the effect of adoption of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

	Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
Net Sales	$	2,929,699		$	3,408,565
Cost of Sales		(1,579,517	)		(1,658,765	)
Gross Profit		1,350,182			1,749,800
Selling Expenses		(1,001,135	)		(1,109,193	)
Research and Development Expenses		(935,869	)		(723,754	)
General and Administrative Expenses		(1,319,988	)		(4,957,735	)
Operating Profit (Loss)		(1,906,810	)		(5,040,882	)
Other Income		7,792			25,561
Net Profit (Loss)		(1,948,885	)		(4,944,011	)
Gain/Loss Per Share		(0.42	)		(1.06	)
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		4,651,173			4,651,173
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		4,651,173			4,651,173

17Net Sales.

~~Consolidated~~Our ~~Results~~net sales decreased 14% from $3,408,565 in 2011 to $2,929,699 in 2012. Sales of ~~Operations~~For-series software decreased 29% from $3,287,638 in 2011 to $2,341,185 in 2012. The decrease in net sales was mainly attributable to a significant decrease in software sales from $3,287,638 in 2011 to $2,341,185 in 2012, a decrease of 29%. In July 2012, the China State Council issued amendments to the current rules and regulations applicable to China's electronic and online trading markets. The amendments restricted the bulk-commodities forward-trade exchange markets, which has directly led to an overall decrease in the demand for electronic trading software. The following table shows our revenue breakdown by business line as a percentage of net sales:

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011

Sales of For-series software	$	2,341,185		$	3,287,638
as a percentage of net sales		80	%		96	%

For-series related system integration	$	255,996		$	120,927
as a percentage of net sales		9	%		4	%

Consulting Services	$	332,518			-
as a percentage of net sales		11	%		-

~~The following table sets forth the results of our operations for the periods indicated:~~17

	Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
Net Sales	$	3,408,565		$	5,027,707
Cost of Sales		(1,658,765	)		(2,038,463	)
Gross Profit		1,749,800			2,989,244
Selling Expenses		(1,109,193	)		(1,050,740	)
Research and Development Expenses		(723,754	)		(743,845	)
General and Administrative Expenses		(4,957,735	)		(1,626,102	)
Operating Profit (Loss)		(5,040,882	)		(431,443	)
Other Income		25,561			728,107
Net Profit (Loss)		(4,944,011	)		(330,428	)
Gain/Loss Per Share		(1.06	)		(0.07	)
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		4,651,173			4,651,173
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		4,651,173			4,651,173

As indicated in the foregoing table, sales of For-series software as a percentage of net sales increased from 96% in 2011 to 80% in 2012 while sales of For-series related system integration as a percentage of net sales increased from 4% in 2011 to 9% in 2012. The increase in our sales of system integration was attributable to an increase in customer sales contracts due to our customer demand. Consulting services as a percentage of net sales increased from 0 in 2011 to 11% in 2012. Due to our experience with bulk commodities electronic trading applications, we began providing consulting services to our potential customers in 2012. Our strategy, however, is to increase software sales as such sales carry higher profit margins.

~~Net~~Cost of Sales.

Our ~~net~~cost of sales decreased 325% from $51,~~027~~658,~~707~~765 in ~~2010 to $3,408,565 in~~ 2011. ~~Sales of For-series software decreased 29% from $4,624,918 in 2010~~ to $31,~~287~~579,~~638~~517 in ~~2011~~2012. ~~The~~This decrease in ~~net sales~~ was ~~mainly~~in ~~attributable~~line towith athe ~~significant~~ decrease in ~~software~~ sales. ~~from~~Cost ~~$4,624,918~~of ~~in 2010 to $3~~sales,~~287,638~~ inas ~~2011,~~ a ~~decrease~~percentage of ~~29%.~~net ~~We recognized significant~~ sales, was ~~from~~54% ~~Guangxi~~and ~~Caexpo~~49% in ~~2010~~2012 ~~but~~and ~~no comparable sales to this customer or another customer in~~ 2011.

~~Cost~~Gross ~~of Sales~~Profit.

~~Our~~Gross ~~cost~~profit ~~of sales~~ decreased 1923% from $21,~~038~~749,~~463~~800 in ~~2010~~2011 to $1,~~658~~350,~~765~~182 in ~~2011~~2012. This decrease was inattributable ~~line~~to ~~with~~ the decrease in net sales. ~~Cost~~The ofgross ~~sales~~profit margin, ~~as a percentage of net sales~~however, was 46% ~~approximately~~and 4251% in ~~both~~2012 ~~2010~~ and 2011 separately.

~~Gross Profit~~Operating Expenses.

~~Gross~~Total ~~profit~~operating ~~decreased~~expenses ~~41%~~increased from $26,~~989~~790,~~244~~682 in ~~2010~~2011 to $13,~~749~~256,~~800~~992 in ~~2011~~2012. This ~~decrease~~increase was ~~attributable~~mainly due to ~~the~~a ~~decrease~~significant inincrease ~~net sales. The gross profit margin, however, remained at approximately 58%~~ in ~~both~~general ~~2010~~ and ~~2011~~administrative expenses.

~~Operating~~Selling expenses decreased 10% from $1,109,193 ~~Expenses~~in 2011 to $1,001,135 in 2012 as a result of a slight decrease in marketing in 2012.

~~Total~~Research ~~operating~~and ~~expenses~~development expenses increased 29% from $3723,~~420,687~~ 754 in ~~2010~~2011 to $6935,~~790,682~~869 in ~~2011~~2012. This increase was ~~mainly~~ due to aan ~~significant~~ increase in ~~general~~expenses ~~and~~from ~~administrative~~the ~~expenses~~Company’s internal research projects.

~~Selling~~General and administrative expenses ~~increased~~decreased 673% from $14,~~050~~957,~~740~~735 in ~~2010~~2011 to $1,~~109~~319,~~193~~988 in ~~2011~~2012. asThe adecrease ~~result~~was ofprimarily anattributable ~~increase~~to $3,650,000 in ~~marketing~~bad debt expense recorded in 2011. Without such non-recurring expense, the general and administrative expense would have increased by .1% or $12,253 from $1,307,735 to $1,319,988.

~~Research~~Operating ~~and~~Profit ~~development expenses decreased 2% from $743,845 in 2010 to $723,754 in 2011~~(Loss).

~~General~~We ~~and~~recorded ~~administrative~~an ~~expenses~~operating ~~increased 205%~~loss ~~from~~of $1,~~626~~906,~~102~~810 in ~~2010~~2012 as compared to an operating loss of $45,~~957~~040,~~735~~882 in 2011, a decrease of 62%. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating loss was ~~primarily~~largely due to athe ~~provision~~higher ~~for~~general and ~~bad~~administrative ~~debts~~expense in 2011.

~~Operating~~Other ~~Profit (Loss)~~Income.

WeOur ~~recorded~~other anincome ~~operating~~decreased ~~loss~~96% offrom $525,~~040,882~~561 in 2011 ~~as compared~~ to ~~an operating loss of~~ $~~431~~7,~~443~~792 in ~~2010,~~2012 anas ~~increase~~a result of ~~1068%.~~a ~~The~~decrease ~~increase~~in ~~was~~our ~~largely~~VAT ~~due~~refund. toOur another ~~increase in~~income ~~provision~~is ~~for~~derived ~~bad~~entirely ~~debts~~from ofVAT ~~$3,719,713~~refund inassociated with ~~2011~~our software sales.

18Net Profit (Loss).

~~Other~~We ~~Income~~recorded a net loss of $1,948,885 in 2012, or basic and diluted loss of $0.42 per share, as compared to a net loss of $4,944,011 in 2011, or basic and diluted loss of $1.06 per share.

~~Our~~Liquidity ~~other~~and ~~income~~Capital ~~decreased 96% from $728,107 in 2010 to $25,561 in 2011 as a result of a decrease in our VAT refund. Our other income is derived entirely from VAT refund associated with our software sales.~~Resources

~~Net~~The ~~Profit~~net cash used in operating activities was $1,016,637 in 2012 as compared to $2,331,803 in 2011. The decrease in net cash used was due to the net loss of $1,948,885 in 2012. The cash flow from investing activities was (~~Loss~~$606,002) in 2012, compared to $50,370 in 2011. The significant decrease in cash used in investing activities was because, on February 2, 2012, Wuxi Exchange increased its registered capital to RMB 50,000,000, and since we invested additional funds, $365,922 (RMB 2,300,000), into Wuxi Exchange, our holding remained a 10% equity interest. The decrease in cash flow from financing activities from $313,232 in 2011 to $18,139 in 2012 was due to no increase of the balance of short-term borrowings in 2012.

~~We recorded a net loss of $4,944,011 in 2011, or basic and diluted loss of $1.06 per share, as compared to a net loss of $330,428 in 2010, or basic and diluted loss of $0.07 per share.~~18

~~Liquidity~~Our accounts ~~and~~receivable ~~Capital~~balance ~~Resources~~at December 31, 2012 was $132,892, as compared to $$203,910 at the end of 2011. The decrease of $71,018 was due to the collection of accounts receivable from one of our major customers. Our inventory position at the end of 2012 was $1,554,868 as compared to $1,157,934 at the beginning of the year. At the end of 2012, we had several inventory items in the process of delivery to two of our major customers.

~~Our~~We ~~capital~~ended ~~requirements~~the ~~are primarily working~~year ~~capital requirements related to costs of hardware for network solution projects and costs associated~~ with the expansion of our business. In order to minimize our working capital requirements, we generally obtain from our hardware vendors payment terms that are timed to permit us to receive payment from our customers for the hardware before our payments to our hardware vendors are due. But we sometimes obtain less favorable payment terms from our customers, thereby increasing our working capital requirements. We have historically financed our working capital and other financing requirements through careful management of our billing cycle and, to a ~~limited extent, bank loans. The net~~ cash ~~used~~position ~~in operating activities was $2,331,803 in 2011 as compared to $2,037,642 in 2010. The increase in net cash used was net loss~~ of $4103,~~944,011 in 2011~~578. ~~The~~We ~~cash~~had ~~flow~~negative ~~from~~operating ~~investing activities was $50,370 in 2011, compared to $2,974,215 in 2010. The significant decrease in~~ cash ~~used in investing activities was because we did not transfer a long-term investment in 2011 as we did in 2010. The increase in cash~~ flow ~~from~~of ~~financing activities from~~ $~~(10~~1,~~458) in 2010 to $313~~016,~~232~~637 inprimarily ~~2011 was~~ due to ~~an increase in~~ the ~~balance~~operating ofloss ~~short-term~~in ~~borrowings~~2012.

~~Our~~Although ~~accounts~~our ~~receivable~~revenues and operating results ~~balance~~for atany ~~December~~period ~~31,~~are ~~2011~~not ~~was~~necessarily ~~$203~~indicative of future periods,~~910,~~ aswe ~~compared~~anticipate tothat ~~$3,778,529~~our atavailable ~~the~~funds ~~end~~and ofcash ~~2010.~~flows ~~The~~generated ~~decrease~~from isoperations ~~mainly~~will ~~attributable~~be sufficient to ~~one~~meet ~~customer~~our anticipated needs for working capital, ~~Guangxi~~capital ~~Caexpo~~expenditures, and business expansion through 2013. ~~The~~In ~~balance~~June of2012, ~~Guangxi~~we ~~Caexpo’s accounts~~signed ~~receivable~~a ~~decreased~~bank toloan $0finance atcontract ~~December~~with ~~31,~~China ~~2011~~Mingsheng ~~from~~Bank ~~$1,901,562~~Ltd. (We received a credit of RMB 122,~~170~~000,000) to atmeet ~~December~~our ~~31,~~working ~~2010~~capital. ~~All~~As ~~accounts~~of ~~receivable from~~the ~~Guangxi~~end ~~Caexpo~~of inDecember ~~2011~~31, ~~were~~2012, ~~accounted~~the ~~for~~balance asof aour ~~provision~~bank ~~for~~loans ~~bad~~was ~~debts~~RMB 2,000,000. ~~Our~~We ~~inventory~~may ~~position~~need atto raise additional funds in the ~~end~~future ofin ~~2011~~order ~~was~~to $1fund acquisitions,~~157~~ develop new or enhanced services or products,~~934 as~~ ~~compared~~respond to ~~$633,998~~competitive pressures atto ~~the~~compete ~~beginning~~successfully offor ~~the~~larger ~~year.~~projects Atinvolving ~~the~~higher ~~end~~levels of ~~2011~~hardware purchases, or if our business otherwise grows more rapidly than we ~~had~~currently ~~several~~predict. ~~inventory~~If ~~items~~we indo ~~the~~need ~~process~~to ofraise ~~delivery~~ additional funds, we expect to ~~two~~raise those funds through new issuances of our ~~major~~equity ~~customers.~~securities through one or more public offerings or private placements, or through credit facilities extended by lending institutions.

WeOur ~~ended~~primary ~~the~~capital ~~year~~requirements relate to capital expenditures associated with ahardware ~~cash~~for ~~position~~network ofsolution $1projects and additional costs incurred to expand our business. In order to minimize our working capital requirements,~~692,449~~ we generally negotiate payment terms from our hardware vendors that allow us to receive payments from our customers prior to our hardware vendor payables becoming due. We ~~had~~have ~~negative~~historically ~~operating~~financed ~~cash~~our ~~flow~~working ofcapital ~~$1,887,820~~and ~~primarily~~other ~~due~~financing torequirements ~~the~~through ~~increase~~careful inmanagement ~~operating~~of ~~loss~~our inbilling ~~2011~~cycle and, to a limited extent, bank loans.

~~Although~~Off-Balance ~~our~~Sheet revenues and operating results for any period are not necessarily indicative of future periods, we anticipate that our available funds and cash flows generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital, capital expenditures, and business expansion through 2012. In October 2011, we signed a bank loan finance contract with China Mingsheng Bank Ltd. We received a credit of RMB 2,000,000 to meet our working capital. As of the end of December 31, 2011, the balance of our bank loans was RMB 2,000,000. We may need to raise additional funds in the future in order to fund acquisitions, develop new or enhanced services or products, respond to competitive pressures to compete successfully for larger projects involving higher levels of hardware purchases, or if our business otherwise grows more rapidly than we currently predict. If we do need to raise additional funds, we expect to raise those funds through new issuances of our equity securities through one or more public offerings or private placements, or through credit facilities extended by lending institutions.Arrangements

~~Off~~There are no off-~~Balance~~balance ~~Sheet~~sheet ~~Arrangements~~arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

~~There~~Contractual are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.Obligations

19As of December 31, 2012, we had commitments under non-cancelable operating leases requiring annual minimum rental payments as follows:

Contractual Obligations

	December 31, 2012

January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012	$	541,481
January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013		203,028
January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014		5,042

	$	749,551

AsItem of7A. ~~December 31, 2011, we had commitments~~Quantitative ~~under~~and ~~non-cancelable~~Qualitative ~~operating~~Disclosures ~~leases~~About ~~requiring~~Market ~~annual minimum rental payments as follows:~~Risk

	December 31, 2011
January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011	$	528,762
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012		522,201
January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013		167,527
	$	1,218,490

Not applicable.

~~Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~19

Not applicable.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The information required by Item 8 begins on page F-1 following this page. Below is an index to the consolidated financial statements.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

	~~Pages~~	Pages
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6 - F-2023

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors and ~~stockholders~~Stockholders of

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ~~Forlink~~Sunrise ~~Software~~Real ~~Corporation~~Estate Group, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, and the related consolidated statements of ~~income~~ operations, stockholders’' ~~equity~~deficit and ~~comprehensive income, and~~ cash flows for the years then ended. ~~Forlink~~These ~~Software~~financial ~~Corporation,~~statements ~~Inc.’s~~are ~~management~~the isresponsibility ~~responsible~~of the ~~for~~Company's ~~these financial statements~~management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audit~~audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The ~~company~~Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the ~~company’~~Company's internal control over ~~financial~~ financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit ~~also~~ includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates ~~made~~ made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the ~~financial~~consolidated ~~statements~~financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial ~~position~~positions of Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010,~~2011 and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~/s/~~The ~~Kenne~~accompanying ~~Ruan,~~financial ~~CPA~~statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, Pthe Company has significant accumulated losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.C Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~Woodbridge~~/s/Kenne Ruan, ~~Connecticut~~CPA, P.C.

Woodbridge. CT, USA, March 1628, ~~2012~~2013

F-1

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Expressed in US Dollars)

	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	2012			2011
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1103,~~692,449~~578		$	31,~~580~~692,~~269~~449
Accounts receivable		~~203~~132,~~910~~892			3203,~~778,529~~910
Other receivables, deposit and prepayments		~~530~~672,~~018~~476			~~563~~530,~~568~~018
Inventories		1,~~157~~554,~~934~~868			~~633~~1,~~998~~157,934
Deferred Taxes Assets		66134,~~001~~119			-66,001
Total current assets		32,~~650~~597,~~312~~933			83,~~556~~650,~~364~~312
Property, plant and equipment		~~262~~225,~~340~~757			~~370~~262,~~409~~340
Long term investments		1,~~074~~363,~~531~~623			1,~~183~~074,~~585~~531
Total assets	$	4,~~987~~187,~~183~~313		$	104,~~110~~987,~~358~~183
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings	$	~~317~~318,~~496~~193		$	317,496
Accounts payable		5616,~~311~~629		$	156,~~027,862~~311
Amounts due to shareholders		260,470			524,668
Amounts due to related party		383,486			260,470
Customer deposits		12,~~811~~631,~~937~~583			1,~~206~~811,~~267~~937
Other payables and accrued expenses		~~451~~864,~~464~~052			~~370~~451,~~318~~464
Other tax payable		-			~~21,531~~-
Deferred Taxes Debt		-			~~32,736~~-
Total current liabilities	$	24,~~897~~213,~~678~~943		$	32,~~183~~897,~~382~~678
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 200,000,000 and 200,000,000 shares authorized; 4,966,173 and 4,966,173 shares issued and 4,651,173 and 4,651,173 shares outstanding, respectively	$	99,322		$	99,322
Treasury stock		(163,800	)		(163,800	)
Additional paid-in capital		10,~~195~~040,~~693~~675			10,195,693
Accumulated losses		(911,~~488~~437,~~659~~544	)		(49,~~544~~488,~~648~~659	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,~~397~~434,~~824~~717			1,~~240~~397,~~849~~824
Non-controlling interest		~~49,125~~-			9949,~~560~~125
Total stockholders' equity	$	2(26,~~089,505~~630	)	$	62,~~926~~089,~~976~~505
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	4,~~987~~187,~~183~~313		$	104,~~110~~987,~~358~~183

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Expressed in US Dollars)

	Year ended December 31, 2011			Year ended December 31, 2010
	Year ended December 31, 2012			Year ended December 31, 2011
Net sales	$	32,~~408~~929,~~565~~699		$	53,~~027~~408,~~707~~565
Cost of sales		(1,~~658~~579,~~765~~517	)		(21,~~038~~658,~~463~~765	)
Gross profit		1,~~749~~350,~~800~~182			21,~~989~~749,~~244~~800
Selling expenses		(1,~~109~~001,~~193~~135	)		(1,~~050~~109,~~740~~193	)
Research and development expenses		(~~723~~935,~~754~~869	)		(~~743~~723,~~845~~754	)
General and administrative expenses		(41,~~957~~319,~~735~~988	)		(14,~~626~~957,~~102~~735	)
Operating profit / (loss)		(51,~~040~~906,~~882~~810	)		(~~431~~5,~~443~~040,882	)
Investment loss		~~(41,233~~-	)		(~~650~~41,~~717~~233	)
Interest income		62,~~584~~242			6,~~550~~584
Interest expenses		(422,~~264~~412	)		(104,~~458~~264	)
Impairment loss on assets		-			(24,692	)
Impairment of assets		(97,449	)		-
Loss from cost method investee		~~(33,718~~-	)		0(33,718	)
Other income, net		257,~~561~~792			~~728~~25,~~107~~561
Profit before income taxes		(51,~~087~~948,~~952~~885	)		(~~382~~5,~~653~~087,952	)
Income tax		93,506			0
Provision for income tax		67,752			93,506
Consolidated profit		(41,~~994~~948,~~446~~885	)		(~~382~~4,~~653~~994,446	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		~~(50,435~~-	)		(5250,~~225~~435	)
Net consolidated profit (loss)	$	(41,~~944~~948,~~011~~885	)	$	(~~330~~4,~~428~~944,011	)
Gain/Loss per share	$	(10.0642	)	$	(01.0706	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		4,651,173			4,651,173

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(Expressed in US Dollars)

	Common Stock
	Number of shares issued		Amount		Number of Treasury Stock		Amount		Treasury Stock			Additional paid-in capital			Accumulated other comprehensive income		Non-~~controllinginterest~~controlling interest			Retained Profits/ (Accumulated Losses)			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Comprehensive Income/ (Losses)
Balance, December 31, 2009		4,966,173		4,651,173		315,000	$	99,322	($	163,800	)	$	10,195,693		$	1,088,745	$	151,785		($	4,214,220	)	$	7,157,525
Balance, December 31, 2010		4,966,173		4,651,173		315,000	$	99,322	$	(163,800	)	$	10,195,693		$	1,240,849	$	99,560		$	(4,544,648	)	$	6,926,976
Shares issued
Net profit for the year																	($	52(50,~~225~~435	)	($	~~330~~(4,~~428~~944,011	)	($	~~382~~(4,~~653~~994,446	)	($	~~382~~(4,~~653~~994,446	)
Translation of foreign operations															$	152,104							$	152,104		$	152,104
Comprehensive income																										($	230,549	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		4,966,173		4,651,173		315,000	$	99,322	($	163,800	)	$	10,195,693		$	1,240,849	$	99,560		($	4,544,648	)	$	6,926,976
Shares issued
Net profit for the year																	($	50,435	)	($	4,944,011	)	($	4,994,446	)	($	4,994,446	)
Translation of foreign operations															$	156,975							$	156,975		$	156,975
Comprehensive income																										($	(4,837,471	)
Balance, December 31, 2011		4,966,173		4,651,173		315,000	$	99,322	($	(163,800	)	$	10,195,693		$	1,397,824	$	49,125		($	(9,488,659	)	$	2,089,505
Shares issued
Net profit for the year																				$	(1,948,885	)	$	(1,948,885	)	$	(1,948,885	)
Translation of foreign operations															$	69,336							$	69,336		$	69,336
Comprehensive income												$	(155,018	)			$	(49,125	)				$	(204,143	)	$	(1,947,301	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		4,966,173		4,651,173		315,000	$	99,322	$	(163,800	)	$	10,040,675		$	1,467,160	$	0		$	(11,505,296	)	$	(61,939	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Decrease)/Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

(Expressed in US Dollars)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income		(41,~~944~~948,~~011~~885	)		(~~330~~4,~~428~~944,011	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Non-controlling interest		~~(50,435~~-	)		(5250,~~225~~435	)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment		7976,~~062~~878			~~143~~79,~~415~~062
Interest expenses		~~4,264~~-			104,~~458~~264
Loss from equity method investee		~~41,233~~-			~~650~~41,~~717~~233
Dividend from cost method investee		~~33,718~~-			-33,718
Impairment of assets		-97,449			~~24,692~~-
Effect of deferred taxes		(~~100~~68,~~368~~118	)		(7100,~~587~~368	)
Charge in:
Account receivables		371,~~762,907~~466			(13,~~260~~762,~~847~~907	)
Other receivables, deposits & prepayments		61(141,~~633~~293	)		~~147~~61,~~316~~633
Inventories		(~~492~~394,~~343~~392	)		~~333~~(492,~~512~~343	)
Account payable		(139,~~022,770~~806	)		(~~709~~1,~~731~~022,770	)
Amounts due to stockholders		(290,343	)		95,418
Amounts due to related party		122,444			(290,343	)
Customers deposits		~~545~~815,~~561~~668			~~(168~~545,~~320~~561	)
Other payables & accrued expenses		62411,~~693~~597			~~(183~~62,~~640~~693	)
Other taxes payable / recoverable		~~(22,604~~-	)		(~~730~~22,~~392~~604	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(2996,~~331,803~~993	)		(2,~~037~~331,~~642~~803	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of long term investment		-(365,922	)		~~(151,213~~-	)
Acquisition of property, plant & equipments		(4935,~~600~~488	)		(1049,~~505~~600	)
Proceeds from disposal of long term investment		15,199			3,024,255
Buyout of Non-controlling interest		(204,592	)		-
Cash dividend from cost method investee		84,771			111,678
Proceeds from disposal of long term investment		-			15,199
Net cash generated from investing activities		50,370			2,974,215
Cash dividend from cost method investee		-			84,771
Net cash generated from investing activities		(606,002	)		50,370
Cash flow from financing activities
Proceeds from short term borrowings		~~(4,264~~-	)		(104,~~458~~264	)
Bank loan obtained		317,496
Loans payments to bank		(318,193	)		-
Net cash generated from financing activities		313,232			(10,458	)
Bank loan obtained		318,193			317,496
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		80,381			413,291
Net cash generated from financing activities		-			313,232
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,887,820	)		1,339,406
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		14,124			80,381
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year		3,580,269			2,240,863
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,588,871	)		(1,887,820	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year		1,692,449			3,580,269
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year		1,692,449			3,580,269
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year		103,578			1,692,449
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Income tax paid	$	~~5,278~~-		$	-5,278
Interest paid	$	-22,462		$	-

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. (the "Company" or the "Registrant" or "Forlink" or “we” or “us”), is a Nevada corporation originally incorporated on January 7, 1986 as "Why Not?, Inc. " under the laws of the State of Utah and subsequently reorganized under the laws of Nevada on December 30, 1993. From 1996 until 1999, the Company was an unfunded venture in search of a suitable business acquisition or business combination.

On November 3, 1999, the Company entered into a Plan of Reorganization with Beijing Forlink Software Technology Co., Ltd., (hereinafter "BFSTC"), a limited liability company organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”), under the terms of which BFSTC gained control of the Company. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Company acquired 100% of the registered and fully paid-up capital of BFSTC in exchange for 20,000,000 shares of the Company's authorized, but unissued, common stock. BFSTC is engaged in the provision of computer software consultancy and engineering services and the development and sale of computer software in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). As a part of its computer consultancy and engineering services, BFSTC is also engaged in the sale of computer hardware. In June 2001, BFSTC changed its name to Forlink Technologies Co. Ltd. (“FTCL”). FTCL is the Company’s major operating subsidiary in China.

In August 2001, the Company acquired Beijing Slait Science & Technology Development Limited Co. (“SLAIT”) pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization dated January 11, 2001. The Company issued 59,430,000 shares of its common stock to SLAIT’s original beneficial owners in exchange for 100% of the outstanding equity of SLAIT. As a result of the share exchange, the former beneficial owners of SLAIT own approximately 70% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company, and SLAIT became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company also agreed to transfer 1,085,000 Renminbi (“RMB”) (approximately US$131,039) to the former owners of SLAIT. A change in control occurred in which all but one of the officers and directors of the Company resigned and two former directors (also former owners) of SLAIT became officers and directors of the Company. Prior to its dissolution 2004, SLAIT provided application system integration technology and specializes in large volume transaction processing software for networks such as mobile phone billing and band operation. Subsequent to the acquisition, the principal activities of SLAIT were gradually shifted to those of FTCL. On February 13, 2004, SLAIT was officially dissolved in accordance with relevant PRC regulations.

On June 18, 2003, Forlink Technologies (Hong Kong) Limited (“FTHK”) was incorporated in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as a limited liability company. In December 2003, FTHK became a wholly owned subsidiary of Forlink. FTHK is an investment holding company set up to take advantage of the favorable business environment in Hong Kong and to facilitate the Company’s investment transactions. Through FTHK, on December 18, 2003, the Company invested $760,870 in All China Logistics Online Co., Ltd. ("All China Logistics"), a privately held PRC company providing logistic services in China, in exchange for a 17.8% equity interest.

On June 14, 2004, Forlink Technologies (Chengdu) Limited ("FTCD") was established as a limited liability company in Chengdu, PRC and subsequently became a wholly owned subsidiary of FTHK in September 2004. FTCD is in the business of providing software outsourcing services and software development. The registered capital of FTCD is $5,000,000 and the fully paid up capital was $750,000 as of December 31, 2005. In April 2006, FTHK further invested $130,000 in FTCD. FTCD commenced operations in late 2005. The registered capital of FTCD was reduced to $200,000 in December 2007, which amount was fully paid as of December 2007.

F-6

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (continued)

In compliance with China’s foreign investment restrictions on telecom value-added services and other laws and regulations, the Company conducts telecom value-added services and application integration services for government organizations in China via Beijing Forlink Hua Xin Technology Co. Ltd. ("BFHX"). BFHX was established in the PRC on September 19, 2003 as a limited liability company. The registered capital of BFHX is $120,733 (RMB 1,000,000) and was fully paid up as of March 31, 2005. Mr. Yi He and Mr. Wei Li have been entrusted as nominee owners of BFHX to hold 70% and 30%, respectively, of the fully paid up capital of BFHX on behalf of the Company as the primary beneficiary. BFHX is considered a Variable Interest Entity ("VIE"), and because the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company’s consolidated financial statements include BFHX. Upon the request of the Company, Mr. Yi He and Mr. Wei Li are required to transfer their ownership interests in BFHX to the Company or its designees at any time for the amount of the fully paid registered capital of BFHX. Mr. Yi He is the Chief Executive Officer, a director and a major stockholder of the Company. Mr. Wei Li is the administration manager of FTCL.

On October 24, 2005, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a 17.5% equity interest of China Liquid Chemical Exchange Company Limited (“CLCE”), a PRC limited liability company, in exchange for deployment of the Company’s For-online Electronic Trading System. In early 2007, CLCE increased its share capital to $1,708,526 (RMB 13,000,000). As the Company did not subscribe the new shares, the Company’s shareholding of CLCE was diluted and as of December 31 2007 was 13.46%. CLCE commenced operations fully in early 2007. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company’s share of the joint venture’s profit (loss) was ($41,931) and $7,793, respectively. China Liquid Chemical Exchange Company Limited paused its operations as of December 31, 2011. The value of the investment was $0 at the end of 2011.

On October 3, 2006, the Company entered into a Transfer of Right to Invest and Project Cooperation Agreement (“Statelink Agreement”) with Statelink International Group, Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company (“Statelink”), pursuant to which the Company acquired 22.73% registered capital in Guangxi Caexpo International Trade and Logistics Co., Ltd. (“Guangxi Caexpo”), a PRC limited liability company in the businesses of real estate development, advertising and computer distribution for cash consideration of $2,557,545 (RMB 20,000,000) from BFHX and stock consideration of 13,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock. On October 26, 2006, BFHX established Forlink Technologies (Guangxi) Limited (“FTGX”), a PRC limited liability company, to carry out a contract from Guangxi Caexpo to build an “Electronic Trade and Logistics Information Platform and Call Center” (the “Project”). At the time of incorporation, BFHX injected RMB 20,000,000 (approximately US$2,557,545) as registered capital to FTGX. On August 20, 2010, the Company transferred all its ownership interests in Guangxi Caexpo to Guangxi Sanqi Investment Co., Ltd for an amount equivalent to 22.73% of Guangxi Caexpo’s fully paid up capital. The Company received a cash payment of $3,024,355 (RMB 20,000,000).

On October 12, 2006, the Company invested $31,969 (RMB 250,000) in Wuxi Stainless Steel Exchange Co., Ltd. (“Wuxi Exchange”), a PRC limited liability company, for a 12.5% equity interest. On January 14, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with a major shareholder of Wuxi Exchange to transfer 2.5% of the Company’s interest in Wuxi Exchange to the major shareholder for a cash payment of RMB 500,000. After this transfer, the Company continues to hold a 10% equity interest in Wuxi Exchange.

On January 25, 2007, the board of directors and the majority holders of the Company’s common stock jointly approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation by written consent, to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 to 200,000,000. The Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to effect the increase of the number of the Company’s authorized common shares was filed with Nevada’s Secretary of State on April 4, 2007.

On April 29, 2007, the Company invested, through BFHX, $138,158 (RMB 1,050,000) in Beijing GuoXin Forlink Internet Technologies Limited (“BGXF”), a privately held PRC company that operates a finance study website, for a 35% equity interest. The investment in BGXF is accounted for under the equity method of accounting due to the Company’s significant influence over the operational and financial policies of BGXF. BGXF commenced operations on March 9 2008. On October 14, 2008, the registered capital of BGXF was increased to RMB 4,285,700, and since the ~~Company~~ Company did not invest additional funds into BGFX, the ratio of its holding was diluted to a 24.5% equity interest. On March 15, ~~2011~~ 2011, the Company transferred all its ownership interests in BGXF to Beijing Guo Xin XinChuang Investment Co., Ltd. for the amount of of BGXF’s 24.5% fully paid up capital. The Company received a cash payment in the amount of $15,232 (RMB 95,741).

F-7

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (continued)

On July 12, 2007, the Company invested through FTGX, $1,063,830 (RMB 8,000,000) in Nanning Bulk Commodities Exchange Corporation Limited (“NNBCE”), a privately held PRC company, for an 80% equity interest. NNBCE became a subsidiary of FTGX. NNBCE, set up on April 29, 2007, commenced operations on March 28, 2008, and provides logistical e-commerce service. On February 2, 2012, the Company acquired all the equity interests of NNBCE for $203,884 (RMB 1,285,960).

On September 5, 2007, the Company invested $465,425 (RMB 3,500,000), through NNBCE, in Guangxi Bulk Sugar & Ethanol Exchange Corporation Limited (“GBSEE”), a PRC limited liability company established on September 12, 2007, for a 35% equity interest. Concurrently, All China Logistics was entrusted as nominee owner of GBSEE to hold 20% of the fully paid up capital of GBSEE on behalf of NNBCE as the primary beneficiary. Upon the request of NNBCE, All China Logistics is required to transfer its ownership interests in GBSEE to NNBCE or its designees at any time for the amount of the 20% fully paid up capital. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - An Interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN 46R”), NNBCE is deemed to hold the primary beneficial interest of 55% equity interest in GBSEE. GBSEE was established to provide logistical e-commerce service, but it was dissolved on December 16, 2007 before it commenced any operations and NNBCE received payments back of its investment in GBSEE of $410,397 (RMB 3,000,000) in December 2007; $66,211 (RMB 484,000) in February 2008, and $2,189 (RMB 16,000) in September 2008.

On December 24, 2007, the board of directors and the majority holders of the Company’s common stock jointly approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation by written consent, to effect a 1-for-20 reverse stock split. The Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to effect the reverse split was filed with Nevada’s Secretary of State on February 21, 2008.

On March 20, 2008, the Company invested $71,124 (RMB 500,000), through BFHX, in Shandong LongDong Internet Technologies Limited (“SDLD”), a PRC limited liability company established on October 24, 2007, for a 5% equity interest. SDLD, which commenced operations in December 2007, is in the business of providing of providing primary products e-commerce services. The purpose of this investment is to gain cash dividends from SDLD.

On February 8, 2010, the Company transferred all its ownership interests in FTCL to BFHX for the amount of FTCL’s 100% fully paid up capital.

The principal activities of the Company are the development and sale of network software systems and the provision of enterprise application system integration services in the PRC. The Company is also engaged in the sale of computer hardware. Set forth below is a diagram illustrating our corporate structure as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012:

F-8

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (continued)

F-9

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Accounting and Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America that include the financial statements of Forlink and its subsidiaries and VIE, namely, FTCL, FTHK, BFHX, FTCD, FTGX, and NNBCE. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Non-controlling interests at the balance sheet date, being the portion of the net assets of subsidiaries attributable to equity interests that are not owned by Forlink, whether directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, are presented in the consolidated balance sheet separately from liabilities and the shareholders’ equity. Non-controlling interests in the results of the Company for the years are also separately presented in the income statement.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

The functional currency of Forlink is US Dollar (“US$”) and the financial records are maintained and the financial statements prepared in US$. The functional currency of FTHK is HK Dollar (“HK$”) and its financial records are maintained, and its financial statements prepared, in HK$. The functional currency of FTCL, BFHX, FTCD, FTGX, and NNBCE is RENMINBI (“RMB”) and their financial records are maintained, and their financial statements are prepared, in RMB.

Foreign currency transactions during the period are translated into each company’s denominated currency at the exchange rates at the transaction dates. Gain and loss resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statement of operations. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated into each company’s denominated currency at the yearend exchange rates. All exchange differences are dealt with in the consolidated statements of operations.

The financial statements of the Company’s operations based outside of the United States have been translated into US$ in accordance with ASC 830. Management has determined that the functional currency for each of the Company’s foreign operations is its applicable local currency. When translating functional currency financial statements into US$, year-end exchange rates are applied to the consolidated balance sheets, while average period rates are applied to consolidated statements of operations. Translation gains and losses are recorded in translation reserve as a component of stockholders’ equity.

The value of the RMB is subject to changes in China’s central government policies and to international economic and political developments affecting supply and demand in the China Foreign Exchange Trading System market. Since 1994, the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies, including US$, has been based on rates set by the People’s Bank of China, which are set daily based on the previous day’s inter-bank foreign exchange market rates and current exchange rates on the world financial markets. Since 1994, the official exchange rate generally has been stable. In July 2005, the Chinese government announced that it will no longer peg its currency exclusively to US$ but will switch to a managed floating exchange rate based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies.

The exchange rates used as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 are US$1:HK$7.8075:RMB6.30 and US$1:HK$7.8277:RMB6.6135, respectively. The weighted average rates ruling for the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 are US$1:HK$7.8075:RMB6.4031, and US$1:HK$7.80:RMB6.6940, respectively.

F-10

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Foreign Currency Risk

The RMB is not a freely convertible currency. The State Administration for Foreign Exchange, under the authority of the People’s Bank of China, controls the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies. The value of the RMB is subject to changes in central government policies and to international economic and political developments affecting supply and demand in the China Foreign Exchange Trading System market.

The PRC subsidiaries conduct their business substantially in the PRC, and their financial performance and position are measured in terms of RMB. Any devaluation of the RMB against the US$ would consequently have an adverse effect on the financial performance and asset values of the Company when measured in terms of US$. The PRC subsidiaries’ products are primarily procured, sold, and delivered in the PRC for RMB. Thus, their revenues and profits are predominantly denominated in RMB. Should the RMB devalue against US$, such devaluation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s profits and the foreign currency equivalent of such profits repatriated by the PRC entities to the Company.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We record an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts that the Company believes to be uncollectible. We have a limited number of customers with individually large amounts due at any given balance sheet date. Any unanticipated change in one of those customers’ credit worthiness or other matters affecting the collectability of amounts due from such customers could have a material effect on the results of operations in the period in which such changes or events occur. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. For inventory used in system integration services, cost is calculated using the specific identification method. For the sale of computer hardware, cost is calculated using first-in, first-out method. Cost includes all costs of purchase, cost of conversion, and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Market value is determined by reference to the sales proceeds of items sold in the ordinary course of business after the balance sheet date or to management estimates based on prevailing market conditions.

Property, Plant, Equipment and Depreciation

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of depreciable assets over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

	Estimated useful life (in years)

Building	20
Computer equipment	3
Office equipment	5
Motor vehicle	10

F-11

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Major improvements of property, plant and equipment are capitalized, while expenditures for repair and maintenance and minor renewals and betterments are charged directly to the statements of operations as incurred. When assets are disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation thereon are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statement of operations.

Computer Software Development Costs

In accordance with ASC 985-20 “Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed,” software development costs are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility in the form of a working model has been established. Deferred software development costs will be amortized over the estimated economic life of the software once the product is available for general release to customers. For the current software products, the Company determined that technological feasibility was reached at the point in time it was available for general distribution. Therefore, no costs were capitalized.

Long Term Investments

The Company’s long term investments consist of (1) equity investments that are accounted for in accordance with the equity method and (2) cost investments that are accounted for under the cost method. Under the equity method, each such investment is reported at cost plus the Company’s proportionate share of the income or loss or other changes in stockholders’ equity of each such investee since its acquisition. The consolidated results of operations include such proportionate share of income or loss. See Note 8.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable, and accounts payable) approximate their fair values as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 because of the relatively short-term maturity of these instruments.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generally provides services under multiple element arrangements, which include software license fees, hardware and software sales, and the provision of system integration services including consulting, implementation, and software maintenance. The Company evaluates revenue recognition on a contract-by-contract basis as the terms of each arrangement vary. The evaluation of the contractual arrangements often requires judgments and estimates that affect the timing of revenue recognized in the statements of operations. Specifically, the Company may be required to make judgments about:

whether the fees associated with our products and services are fixed or determinable;

whether collection of our fees is reasonably assured;

whether professional services are essential to the functionality of the related software product;

whether we have the ability to make reasonably dependable estimates in the application of the percentage-of-completion method; and

whether we have verifiable objective evidence of fair value for our products and services.

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with the provisions of ASC 985, “Software Revenue Recognition.” ASC 985 requires among other matters, that there be a signed contract evidencing an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable.

F-12

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Software license revenue is recognized over the accounting periods contained in the terms of the relevant agreements, commencing upon the delivery of the software provided that (1) there is evidence of an arrangement, (2) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (3) collection of the fee is considered probable.

Revenue from non-software, multiple-element arrangements is recognized in accordance with ASC 605-25, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” Under ASC 605-25, the Company recognizes revenue from the multiple-deliverables that has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Deliverables in an arrangement that do not meet the separation criteria in ASC 605-25 are treated as one unit of accounting for purposes of revenue recognition.

In the case of maintenance revenues, vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of fair value is based on substantive renewal prices, and the revenues are recognized ratably over the maintenance period.

In the case of consulting and implementation services revenues, where VSOE is based on prices from stand-alone sale transactions, the revenues are recognized as services that are performed pursuant to ASC 985-605-25.

For hardware transactions where software is incidental, the Company does not apply separate accounting guidance to the hardware and software elements. The Company applies the provisions of ASC 985-605-15. Per ASC 985-605-15, if the software is considered non-essential to the functionality of the hardware, then the hardware is not considered “software related” and is excluded from the scope of ASC 985-605-15. Such sale of computer hardware is recognized as revenue on the transfer of risks and rewards of ownership, which generally coincides with the time when the goods are delivered to customers and title has passed.

Remote hosting services, where VSOE is based upon consistent pricing charged to customers based on volumes and performance requirements on a stand-alone basis and substantive renewal terms, are recognized ratably over the contract term as the services are performed. The remote hosting arrangements generally require the Company to perform one-time set-up activities and include a one-time set-up fee. This one-time set-up fee is generally paid by the customer at the time the contract is executed. The Company has determined that these set-up activities do not constitute a separate unit of accounting, and accordingly, the related set-up fees are recognized protractedly over the term of the contract.

The Company is considering the applicability of ASC 985-605-55, “Application of AICPA Statement of SOP 97-2 to Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware,” to the hosting services arrangements on a contract-by-contract basis. If the Company determines that the customer does not have the contractual right to take possession of the Company’s software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty, ASC 985-605 would not apply to these contracts in accordance with ASC 985-605-55.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted “Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 718, Share-Based Payment,” using the modified prospective application transition method. Before we adopted ASC 718, we accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with “Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.”

ASC 718 requires the Company to record the cost of stock options and other equity-based compensation in its income statement based upon the estimated fair value of those rewards. The Company elected to use the modified prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other equity-based compensation beginning in the first quarter of adoption. Accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to reflect stock-based compensation. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted ASC 718 using the modified prospective method. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements because most of the Company’s outstanding stock options were vested as of December 31, 2005, and the unvested portion of the stock options was considered immaterial.

F-13

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

ASC 718 also requires the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense relating to stock-based compensation as opposed to recognizing forfeitures as an expense reduction as they incur. The adjustment to apply estimated forfeitures to previously stock-based compensation was considered immaterial by the Company and as such was not classified as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. As of January 1, 2006, the Company had no unrecognized compensation cost remaining associated with existing stock option grants. Also, the Company made no modifications to outstanding stock option grants prior to the adoption of ASC 718, and there were no changes in valuation methodologies or assumptions compared to those used by the Company prior to January 1, 2006.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FSP No. 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.” The Company adopted the alternative transition method provided in the FSP for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. The alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the Additional Paid-in Capital (“APIC”) pool related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of ASC 718. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

In February 2006, the FASB issued FASB ASC 718-10-35, “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event.” This position amended ASC 718 to incorporate that a cash settlement feature that can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control does not meet certain conditions in ASC 718 until it becomes probable that the event will occur. The guidance in this FASB Staff Position was required to be applied upon initial adoption of ASC 718. The Company does not have any option grants that allow for cash settlement.

The Company did not adopt any new stock-based compensation plans in 2010. 200,000 stock options issued under the Company’s 2002 Stock Plan were exercised during the 2008 year.

Advertising Costs

All advertising costs incurred in the promotion of the Company’s products and services are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses were insignificant for ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under ASC 740, deferred tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets not be realized.

F-14

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Earnings per Common Share

The Company computes net earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 98 (“SAB 98”). Under the provisions of ASC 260 and SAB 98, basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing the net earnings available to common shareholders for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted net earnings per share gives effect to common stock equivalents, however, potential common stock in the diluted EPS computation are excluded in net loss periods, as their effect is anti-dilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued anASU 2011-04 ~~authoritative~~to provide a consistent ~~pronouncement~~definition onof fair value ~~measurement.~~(“FV”) ~~The~~and ~~guidance~~ensure isthat the ~~result~~FV ofmeasurement ~~joint~~and ~~efforts~~disclosure byrequirements ~~the~~are ~~FASB~~similar ~~and the International Accounting~~between ~~Standards~~accounting ~~Board~~principles togenerally ~~develop~~accepted ain ~~single,~~the ~~converged~~United ~~fair~~States ~~value~~of ~~framework.~~America ~~The~~(“US ~~guidance~~GAAP”) isand ~~largely~~IFRS. ~~consistent~~ASU ~~with~~2011-04 ~~existing~~changes certain ~~fair~~FV ~~value~~ measurement principles inand ~~GAAP.~~enhances ~~The guidance expands~~ the ~~existing~~ disclosure requirements particularly for ~~fair~~Level ~~value~~3 FV measurements. ~~and~~The ~~makes~~adoption ~~other~~of ~~amendments,~~ASU ~~mainly~~2011-04 ~~including:~~did not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

·In ~~Highest-and-best-use~~July ~~and~~2012, ~~valuation~~the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement related to testing indefinite-~~premise~~lived ~~concepts~~intangible assets, other than goodwill, for ~~nonfinancial~~impairment. ~~assets—~~Under the guidance, ~~indicates~~an entity testing an indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment has the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the asset. If the entity determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the ~~highest-and-best-use~~fair ~~and~~value ~~valuation~~of the indefinite-~~premise~~lived intangible ~~concepts~~asset ~~only~~is ~~apply~~not tomore ~~measuring~~likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) impaired, the entity would not need to calculate the fair value of ~~nonfinancial~~the asset. The guidance does not revise the requirement to test indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment. In addition, the guidance does not amend the requirement to test these assets for impairment between annual tests if there is a change in events or circumstances; however, it does revise the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider in interim periods. The guidance was effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.

·In ~~Application~~February, to2013, ~~financial~~the ~~assets~~FASB issued ASU 2013-02 that addresses the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This ASU clarifies FASB Codification Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, and ~~financial~~requires ~~liabilities~~an ~~with~~entity ~~offsetting~~to ~~positions~~report inthe ~~market~~effect ~~risks~~of orsignificant ~~counterparty~~reclassifications ~~credit~~out ~~risk—~~of accumulated other comprehensive income on the ~~guidance~~net ~~permits~~income anline ~~exception~~items affected if the amount is required under US GAAP to ~~fair~~be ~~value~~reclassified ~~measurement~~in ~~principles~~its ~~for~~entirety ~~financial~~to ~~assets~~net income ~~and~~in ~~financial~~the ~~liabilities~~same ~~(and~~reporting ~~derivatives)~~period. ~~with~~Amounts ~~offsetting~~not ~~positions~~required to be reclassified in ~~market~~their ~~risks~~entirety orto ~~counterparty~~net ~~credit~~income ~~risk~~must ~~when~~be ~~several~~cross-referenced to ~~criteria~~other ~~are~~disclosures ~~met.~~that ~~When~~provide ~~the~~additional ~~criteria~~detail about those amounts. These amendments are ~~met~~effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, an2013. ~~entity~~Because ~~can~~the ~~measure~~only significant amounts in the ~~fair~~Company’s ~~value~~accumulated ofother comprehensive income relate to foreign exchange translations, the ~~net~~Company ~~risk~~does ~~position~~not expect significant impact by this standard in the foreseeable future.

·Other ~~Premiums~~accounting orstandards ~~discounts~~that inhave ~~fair~~been ~~value~~issued ~~measure—the guidance provides that premiums~~ or ~~discounts~~proposed by ~~that reflect size as a characteristic of~~ the ~~reporting~~FASB ~~entity’s~~or ~~holding~~other ~~(specifically,~~standards-setting abodies ~~blockage factor~~ that ~~adjusts~~do ~~the~~not ~~quoted~~require ~~price~~adoption ofuntil ~~an asset or~~ a ~~liability~~future ~~because~~date ~~the~~are ~~market’s normal daily trading volume is~~ not ~~sufficient~~expected to ~~absorb~~have ~~the quantity held by the entity) rather than as~~ a ~~characteristic~~significant impact ofon the ~~asset~~Company’s orconsolidated ~~liability~~financial ~~(for~~statements ~~example,~~upon ~~a control premium when measuring the fair value of a controlling interest) are not permitted in a fair value measurement~~adoption.

· Fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity’s stockholders’ equity—the guidance prescribes a model for measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in stockholders’ equity; this model is consistent with the guidance on measuring the fair value of liabilities.

· Disclosures about fair value measurements—the guidance expands disclosure requirements, particularly for Level 3 inputs. Required disclosures include:

(i) For fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: (1) a quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the measurement, (2) a description of the valuation process in place (e.g., how the entity decides its valuation policies and procedures, as well as changes in its analyses of fair value measurements, from period to period), and (3) a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs.

(ii) The level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed.

F-15

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

~~The~~Going guidance is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for public entities. Early application by public entities is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.Concern

InThe ~~June~~Company’s ~~2011,~~financial ~~the FASB issued an authoritative~~statements ~~pronouncement~~are toprepared ~~require~~according ~~an entity~~ to ~~present~~ the ~~total~~accounting ofprinciples ~~comprehensive~~generally ~~income,~~accepted ~~the~~in ~~components of net income, and~~ the ~~components of~~United ~~other~~States ~~comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement~~ of ~~comprehensive~~America ~~income~~applicable ~~or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required~~ to ~~present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with~~ a ~~total~~going ~~for other comprehensive income~~concern, ~~and a total amount for comprehensive income. The~~ ~~guidance~~which ~~eliminates~~contemplates the ~~option~~realization ~~to present the components~~ of ~~other~~assets ~~comprehensive~~and ~~income~~liquidation ~~as part~~ of ~~the~~liabilities ~~statement of changes~~ in ~~stockholders’ equity. The guidance does not change~~ the ~~items~~normal ~~that~~course ~~must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item~~ of ~~other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income~~business. The ~~guidance~~Company ~~should~~has ~~be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the guidance is~~accumulated ~~effective~~losses ~~for~~of ~~fiscal years and interim periods within those years~~$11, ~~beginning after December 15~~437,544 ~~2011.~~as ~~Early~~of ~~adoption is permitted. In~~ December ~~2011~~31, ~~the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement related to deferral of the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income~~2012. ~~This~~The ~~guidance~~Company’s ~~allows the FASB to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of~~ net ~~income~~working ~~and~~capital ~~other~~deficiency ~~comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the FASB is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments~~ and ~~the~~significant ~~needs~~accumulated ~~of financial statement~~losses ~~users~~raise ~~for~~substantial ~~additional~~doubt ~~information~~ about ~~reclassification~~its ~~adjustments,~~ability ~~entities~~to ~~should~~ continue toas report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before the pronouncement update was issued in June 2011. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a ~~significant~~going ~~effect on our consolidated financial statements~~concern.

~~In September 2011~~However, ~~the~~management ~~FASB~~believes ~~issued~~that the anCompany ~~authoritative~~is ~~pronouncement~~able ~~related~~ to ~~testing~~generate ~~goodwill~~sufficient ~~for~~cash ~~impairment.~~flow ~~The~~to ~~guidance~~meet isits ~~intended~~obligations toon ~~simplify~~a ~~how~~timely ~~entities,~~basis ~~both public~~ and ~~nonpublic,~~ultimately ~~test goodwill for impairment. The guidance permits an entity~~ to ~~first~~attain ~~assess qualitative factors to determine~~successful ~~whether~~operations itin isrespect ~~“more likely than not” that the fair value~~ of ~~a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform~~ the ~~two-step~~agency ~~goodwill~~sales ~~impairment test. The guidance is effective for annual~~ and ~~interim~~property ~~goodwill~~management ~~impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011~~operations. ~~Early adoption is permitted~~Accordingly, ~~including~~ ~~for~~the ~~annual~~accompanying ~~and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011 if a public entity’s~~ financial statements do ~~for the most recent annual or interim period have~~ not ~~yet~~include ~~been~~any ~~issued.~~adjustments Wethat domay ~~not~~be ~~expect~~necessary if the ~~adoption~~Company ofis ~~this pronouncement~~unable to ~~have~~continue as a ~~significant~~going ~~effect on our consolidated financial statements~~concern.

F-16

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 3 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of the customers’ financial conditions and the Company generally does not require collateral.

Senior management reviews accounts receivable from time to ~~time~~ time to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible. The Company included any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible in the allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. For the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the ~~Company’s~~balances ~~management determined,~~of ~~after~~Accounts ~~numerous~~Receivable were ~~failed~~$132,892 ~~attempts~~and to$203,910, ~~collect~~respectively, toat ~~write~~December ~~off~~31, as2012 ~~bad~~and ~~debt two major accounts from Accounts Receivable~~2011.

NOTE 4 - OTHER RECEIVABLES, DEPOSITS AND PREPAYMENTS

	December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	2012		2011
Other receivables	$	~~487~~282,~~330~~942	$	~~490~~487,~~760~~330
Deposits		8267,~~247~~481		68,~~033~~247
Prepayments		34122,~~441~~053		6634,~~775~~441
	$	~~530~~672,~~018~~476	$	~~563~~530,~~568~~018

Other receivables include deposits for operating leases and advances to employee for traveling outlays.

NOTE 5 - INVENTORIES

	December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	2012		2011
Computer hardware and software	$	9056,~~851~~415	$	4790,~~014~~851
Work-in-progress		1,~~067~~498,~~083~~453		~~586~~1,~~984~~067,083
	$	1,~~157~~554,~~934~~868	$	~~633~~1,~~998~~157,934

All the inventories were purchased for identified system integration contracts.

Work-in-progress includes payroll and other operating expenses associated with various contracts in progress.

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY

The Company has had, and expects to have in the future, transactions in the ordinary course of business with its stockholders, directors, senior officers, and other affiliates (and their associates) on substantially the same terms as those prevailing for comparable transactions with others. Listed below is a summary of material relationships or transactions with the Company’s stockholders, directors, senior officers, and other affiliates:

Amounts Due to ~~Stockholders~~Related Party

The Company, from time to time, received from or made repayment to one major stockholder who is also a member of management. The amounts due to stockholders do not bear any interest and do not have clearly defined terms of repayment.

F-17

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY (continued)

As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the amounts due to stockholders represented advances from stockholders with the amount of $~~260~~369,~~470~~166 and $~~524~~260,~~668~~470, respectively.

Related Party Transactions

Sales

Receivable

Customer Deposit

Year Ended December 31,

As of December 31,

Related party

~~2011~~2012

~~2010~~2011

~~2011~~2012

~~2010~~2011

~~2011~~2012

~~2010~~2011

All China

~~7,474~~-

~~158,748~~-

~~151~~158,~~213~~748

14,~~287~~319

1314,~~609~~287

Guangxi Caexpo

~~1,683,246~~-

~~3,543,155~~-

SDLD

~~29,894~~-

Total

~~1,720,614~~-

~~158,748~~-

3158,~~694,368~~748

14,~~287~~319

1314,~~609~~287

NOTE 7 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	2012			2011
Building	$	180,137		$	~~213~~180,~~705~~137
Computer and office equipment		1,~~066~~107,~~908~~203			1,~~221~~066,~~478~~908
Motor vehicles		149,657			~~211~~149,~~698~~657
		1,396,702			1,646,881
		1,436,997			1,396,702
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(1,~~134~~211,~~362~~240	)		(1,~~276~~134,~~472~~362	)
	$	~~262~~225,~~340~~757			~~370~~262,~~409~~340

The building is located in Chengdu, PRC and was purchased on behalf of the Company by Mr. Yi He, the CEO and a director and stockholder. By a stockholders’ resolution passed on March 8, 1999, it was ratified that the title to the building belonged to the Company. In 2005, the title to the building was transferred to the Company.

NOTE 8 - LONG TERM INVESTMENTS

	December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	2012		2011
Equity investments	$	-	$	~~54,418~~-
Cost investments		1,~~074~~363,~~531~~623		1,~~129~~074,~~167~~531
	$	1,~~074~~363,~~531~~623		1,~~183~~074,~~585~~531

In December 2003, the Company invested $760,870 in a privately held PRC company, All China Logistics Online Co., Ltd., for a 17.8% equity interest. The Company recorded the investment at cost because it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee.

F-18

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 8 - LONG TERM INVESTMENTS (continued)

On October 24, 2005, the Company set up China Liquid Chemical Exchange Company Limited, a limited liability company in PRC, and shares the risk and rewards up to the equity interest of 13.46%. The consideration is made in form of the Company-developed “For-Online Electronic Trading System” without any cash outflow. Therefore, the Company recorded the contribution of software at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value, and accounted for under the equity method under SOP 78-9. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Company’s share of the joint venture’s profit (loss) was 0 and ($41,931) ~~and $7~~,~~793,~~ respectively. China Liquid Chemical Exchange Company Limited paused its operations as of December 31, 2011. The value of the investment was $0 at the end of ~~2011~~2012.

On October 12, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire 12.5% of registered capital in Wuxi Stainless Steel Exchange Co., Ltd. (“Wuxi”), a private held PRC company. In exchange for the 12.5% registered capital, the Company was to deploy a proprietary, integrated software solution (“software”), estimated at RMB 1,000,000, by reference to the similar products sold to third parties in 2006, to support Wuxi’s operations, plus RMB 250,000 cash payment to Wuxi. In 2006, the Company contributed cash of $31,969 (RMB 250,000), the software been deployed to Wuxi in December 2006. The Company recorded the investment at cost because it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over Wuxi. On January 14, 2007, the Company entered into a Share Transfer Agreement with a major shareholder of Wuxi to transfer 2.5% interest in Wuxi held by the Company to the major shareholder for a cash payment of RMB 500,000. After this transfer, the Company continues to hold a 10% equity interest in Wuxi.

On April 29, 2007, the Company invested $138,158 in a privately held PRC company, Beijing GuoXin Forlink Internet Technologies Limited (“BGXF”), for a 35% equity interest. The Company’s investment was made through BFHX. The investment in BGXF is accounted for under the equity method of the accounting due to the Company’s significant influence over the operational and financial policies of BGXF. On March 15, 2011, the Company transferred all its ownership interests in BGXF to Beijing Guo Xin XinChuang Investment Co., Ltd. for the amount of BGXF’s 24.5% fully paid up capital. The Company ~~received~~got a cash payment of RMB 95,741. ~~On March 9, 2008, BGXF commenced operations.~~

On September 17, 2007, the Company invested $99,734 in a privately held PRC Company, Ningbo Bulk Commodities Exchange Corporation Limited (“NBBCE”), for a 25% equity interest. The Company’s investment was made through BFHX. The Company recorded the investment at cost as the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over NBBCE because NBBCE’s strategic and business decisions are dominated by another major shareholder. NBBCE paused its operations as of December 31, 2011. The value of the investment was $0 at the end of ~~2011~~2012.

On March 20, 2008, Forlink invested $71,124 (500,000 RMB), through BFHX, in Shandong LongDong Internet Technologies Limited (“SDLD”), a PRC limited liability company, established on October 24, 2007, for a 5% equity interest. SDLD, which commenced operations in December 2007, is in the ~~business~~ business of providing of providing primary products e-commerce services. The ~~purpose~~Company's share of ~~this~~joint venture's loss was (79,374) in 2012. The value of the investment iswas to$0 ~~gain~~at ~~cash~~the ~~dividends~~end ~~from~~of ~~SDLD~~2012.

On October 8, 2010, the Company invested $151,213 (RMB 1,000,000), through BFHX, in Shanghai Shipping Freight Exchange Co., LTD (“SSFE”), a PRC limited liability company, established on October 8, 2010, for a 5% equity interest. SSFE has commenced operations on March 25, 2011. The Company has recorded the investment at cost because it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee.

F-19

~~Forlink~~On ~~Software~~October ~~Corporation~~8, ~~Inc~~2010, the Company invested $151,213 (RMB 1,000,000), through BFHX, in Shanghai Shipping Freight Exchange Co., LTD (“SSFE”), a PRC limited liability company, established on October 8, 2010, for a 5% equity interest. SSFE has commenced operations on March 25, 2011. The Company has recorded the investment at cost because it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee.

~~Notes~~NOTE to9- ~~Consolidated~~SHORT_TERM ~~Financial Statements~~BORROWINGS

~~NOTE~~On 9June –4 ~~SHORT~~2012, ~~TERM~~we ~~BORROWINGS~~signed a bank loan finance contract with China Mingsheng Bank Ltd. We received a credit of $317,496 (RMB 2,000,000) to meet our working capital. The bank loan had a period of 12 months, at an annual rate of 8.528%. As of the end of December 31, 2012, the balance of our bank loans was $317,496 (RMB 2,000,000).

On October 20, 2011, the Company signed a bank loan finance contract with China Mingsheng Bank Ltd. The Company received a credit of $317,496 (RMB 2,000,000) to meet its working capital. The bank loan has a term of 6 months and an annual rate of 7.93%. As of December 31, 2011, the balance of this loan was $317,496 (RMB 2,000,000).

NOTE 10 - OTHER PAYABLES AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

	December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	2012		2011
Other payables	$	~~258~~672,~~912~~086	$	~~196~~258,~~412~~912
Accrued salaries & wages		~~192~~191,~~552~~966		~~173~~192,~~906~~552
Other accrued expenses		-		-
	$	~~451~~864,~~464~~052	$	~~370~~451,~~318~~464

NOTE 11 ~~– NON~~-~~CONTROLLING~~ ~~INTEREST~~INCOME TAX

The non-controlling interest balance of $49,125 represents cash provided by minority shareholders of NNBCE.

NOTE 12 - INCOME TAX

According to relevant PRC tax rules and regulations, FTCL, which is recognized as a New Technology Enterprise operating within a New and High Technology Development Zone, is entitled to an Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”) rate of 15%.

Pursuant to approval documents dated September 23, 1999 and August 2, 2000 issued by the Beijing Tax Bureau and State Tax Bureau respectively, FTCL was fully exempted from the EIT for fiscal years 1999 through 2002. FTCL received a 50% EIT reduction at the rate of 7.5% for fiscal years 2003 through 2005. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, FTCL was entitled to an EIT rate of 15%.

Pursuant to an approval document dated January 19, 2004 issued by the State Tax Bureau, BFHX was fully exempted from EIT for fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, BFHX was entitled to an EIT rate of 25%.

The Hong Kong profits tax is calculated at 16.5% on the estimated assessable profits of FTHK. The EIT rate for FTCD, FTGX and NNBCE is 25%. No provision for EIT and Hong Kong profits tax were made for FTCL, FTCD, FTGX, NNBCE, and FTHK as they did not have taxable income during relevant periods.

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). This interpretation provides guidance for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions, as defined in ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a threshold condition that a tax position must meet for any of the benefits of the uncertain tax position to be recognized in the financial statements. Guidance is also provided regarding derecognition, classification, and disclosure of these uncertain tax positions. The Company classified all interest and penalties related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. The Company’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties which relate to tax years still subject to review by taxing authorities. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to our liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the Company’s results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Company does not have any liability for uncertain tax positions. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results operations, financial position, or liquidity.

F-20

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1211 - INCOME TAX (continued)

On March 16, 2007, the 5th Plenary Session of the 10th National People's Congress passed the Corporate Income Tax Law of the PRC ("the New Corporate Income Tax Law"), which took effect on January 1, 2008. Beginning on that date, the EIT rate is expected to gradually increase to the standard rate of 25% over a five-year transition period. The New Corporate Income Tax Law, however, does not specify how the existing preferential tax rate will gradually increase to the standard rate of 25%. Also, under the New Corporate Income Tax Law, certain high technology enterprises will continue to be entitled to a reduced tax rate of 15%. But the implementation rules regarding the preferential tax policies (e.g. the details on how the taxpayer can qualify as a high-tech enterprise under the New Corporate Income Tax Law) have yet to be made public. Consequently, the Company is not able to make an estimate of the expected financial effect of the New Corporate Income Tax Law on its deferred tax assets and liabilities. The enactment of the New Corporate Income Tax Law did not have any financial effect on the provision for income tax for the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and on the amounts accrued in the balance sheet in respect of current tax payable.

Reconciliation between the provision for income taxes computed by applying the statutory tax rate in China to income before income taxes and the actual provision for income taxes is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2011			Year Ended December 31, 2010
	Year Ended December 31, 2012			Year Ended December 31, 2011
	USD			USD
Provision of income taxes at statutory tax rate of 15%	$	~~(5,190~~-	)	$	(~~299~~5,~~985~~190	)
Tax holidays and concessions		-			-
Effect of different tax rate of a subsidiary operating in Hong Kong		-		$	~~(103,851~~-	)
Permanent difference		-		$	~~436,195~~-
Increase in valuation allowance		-			-
Timing different on revenue recognition & FA, etc.	$	9867,~~696~~752		$	~~(32~~98,~~359~~696	)
Others		-			-
Effective tax	$	9367,~~506~~752		$	-93,506

NOTE 1312 - OTHER TAXES RECOVERABLE/(PAYABLE)

Other taxes payable comprise mainly of the Valued-Added Tax (“VAT”) and Business Tax (“BT”). The Company is subject to output VAT levied at the rate of 17% of its operating revenue. The input VAT paid on purchases of materials and other direct inputs can be used to offset the output VAT levied on operating revenue to determine the net VAT payable or recoverable. BT is charged at a rate of 5% on the revenue from other services.

As part of the PRC government’s policy of encouraging software development in the PRC, companies that fulfill certain criteria set by the relevant authorities and that develop their own software products and have the software products registered with the relevant authorities in the PRC are entitled to a refund of VAT equivalent to the excess over 3% of revenue paid in the month when output VAT exceeds input VAT (excluding export sales). The excess portion of the VAT is refundable and is recorded by the Company on an accrual basis. The VAT rebate included in other income was $25(71,~~561~~498) and $~~728~~25,~~107~~561 for the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively.

F-21

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1413 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Lease Commitment

During the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Company incurred lease expenses amounting to $~~528~~532,~~762~~021 and $~~472~~528,~~277~~762, respectively. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Company had commitments under non-cancelable operating leases requiring annual minimum rentals as follows:

	December 31,2011		December 31, 2010
	December 31,2012		December 31, 2011
January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011	$	528,762	$	472,277
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012	$	541,481	$	506,088
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012		506,088		130,580
January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013		203,028		167,527
January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013		167,527		-
January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014		5,042		-
	$	1749,~~202,377~~551	$	~~602~~673,~~857~~615

NOTE 1514 - ~~STOCK~~CONCENTRATION ~~PLAN~~OF CUSTOMERS

On August 16, 2002, the Company established the “Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan” (the “2002 Plan”), and reserved 8,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2002 Plan either directly as stock awards or underlying options. The board of directors would determine the terms and conditions of each option granted under the 2002 Plan, which terms and conditions would be in writing and may vary from one eligible participant to another. On August 15, 2007, the 2002 Plan expired pursuant to its terms.

The following table summarizes the activities of stock options granted under the 2002 Plan prior to its expiration:

	Number of shares			Weighted average exercise price
Granted on September 7, 2004		3,315,000		$	0.10
Exercised		(15,000	)	$	(0.10	)
Forfeited or Cancelled		0		$	0.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2004		3,300,000		$	0.10
Exercised		(136,500	)	$	(0.10	)
Forfeited or Cancelled		(132,500	)	$	(0.10	)
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		3,031,000		$	0.10
Exercised		0		$	0.00
Forfeited or Cancelled		(1,734,000	)	$	(0.10	)
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		1,297,000		$	0.10
Exercised		(897,000	)	$	(0.10	)
Forfeited or Cancelled		0		$	0.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2007		400,000		$	0.10
Exercised		200,000			0.00
Forfeited or Cancelled		200,000			0.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2008		0			0.10
Fully vested and exercisable at December 31, 2011		0		$	0.10

F-22

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 15 - STOCK PLAN (continued)

On September 7, 2004, 3,315,000 options were granted to the Company’s employees to purchase the Company’s shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. Of the 3,315,000 options, 800,000 options with a 5-year vesting period were granted to an employee, and 2,515,000 options with a 3-year vesting period were granted to selected employees. Of the 2,515,000 options with the 3-year vesting period, 2,385,000 options was to expire on December 30, 2006 (the “December 2006 Options”), while the remaining 130,000 options expired on June 30, 2007 (the “June 2007 Options”). The expiration date for 800,000 options with the 5-year vesting period is June 30, 2009 (the “June 2009 Options”). On September 7, 2004, January 1, 2005, January 1, 2006 and January 1, 2007, 854,500 (the “December 2006 Options”), 904,500, 1,156,000 (400,000 of “June 2009 Options”; 130,000 of “June 2007 Options”; and 626,000 of “December 2006 Options”) and 200,000 (the “June 2009 Options”) options were vested to employees, respectively. The market price of the stock as of September 7, 2004 and January 1, 2005 was $0.10 per share. In December 2006, the Company extended the expiration date of the December 2006 Options by one month to the end of January 2007, but there was no additional compensation expense as the Company considered the amount was immaterial. On January 29, 2007, 367,000 options of the “December 2006 Options” and 400,000 of the “June 2009 options” were exercised. On July 6, 2007, 130,000 options of the “June 2007 Options” were exercised.

The following table summarizes the cumulative activities up to December 31, 2011 of the options issued under the 2002 Plan with different expiration dates:

	Granted		Exercised		Forfeited or Cancelled		Outstanding at December 31, 2011
December 2006 Options		2,385,000		518,500		1,866,500		0
June 2007 Options		130,000		130,000		0		0
June 2009 Options		800,000		600,000		200,000		0
		3,315,000		1,248,500		2,066,500		0

The weighted average fair value of the December 2006 Options, the June 2007 Options, and the June 2009 Options granted on the date of grant were $0.042, $0.046, and $0.058 per option, respectively. At December 31, 2011, all future compensation expenses were recognized.

There was no aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the intrinsic value, based on options with an exercise price less than the market value of the Company’s stock on December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which would have been received by the option holders had those option holders exercised those options at of that date.

The Company calculated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following assumptions were used for each respective option.

	The Value of Options
	December 2006 Options			June 2007 Options			June 2009 Options
Risk-free interest rate		2.17	%		2.28	%		2.66	%
Expected lives (in years)		1.167			1.417			2.417
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%
Expected volatility		100	%		100	%		100	%

F-23

Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 16 - CONCENTRATION OF CUSTOMERS

For the periods presented below, the following customers accounted for more than 10% of total sales:

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2011			2010
	2012			2011
Net sales derived from - Customer A		1,~~060~~001,~~918~~781			1,~~083~~060,~~241~~918
- Customer B		*303,195			~~1,683,246~~*
- Customer C		~~338,360~~*			*
-Customer D		481,190			*
- Customer D		*			481,190
- Customer E		*			*
% to total net sales - Customer A		31	%		2231	%
- Customer B		10	%		33*	%
- Customer C		14	%		*
-Customer D		*			*
- Customer E		*			*
Account receivable from - Customer A		*			*
- Customer B		*			*
- Customer C		*			*
-Customer D		*			*
- Customer D		*			*
- Customer E		~~126,998~~*			*14	%
% to total accounts receivable- Customer A		*			*
Account receivable from - Customer A		50,911			*
- Customer B		*17,819			*
- Customer C		*15,910			*
-Customer D		*			*
- Customer D		*			*
- Customer E		62*	%		*
% to total accounts receivable- Customer A		38	%		*
- Customer B		13	%		*
- Customer C		12	%		*
- Customer D		*			*
- Customer E		*			*

* less than 10%

~~NOTE 17 – GAIN (LOSS) PER SHARE~~F-22

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company~~15 ~~reported~~– aGAIN ~~loss of $~~(~~1.06~~LOSS) ~~per~~PER ~~share for the 2011 year compared with a loss of $(0.07) per share for the 2010 year.~~SHARE

~~NOTE~~The 18Company –reported ~~SUBSEQUENT~~a ~~EVENT~~loss of $(0.42) per share for the 2012 year compared with a loss of $(1.06) per share for the 2011 year.

~~None.~~NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT

~~F-24~~On February 28, 2013, the Company received $1,787,699 (RMB 11,261,250) from one of its major customers for a former debt that was written off as bad debt in 2011.

F-23

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) and internal control over financial reporting. The evaluation was conducted, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with internal control policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Management’s assessment included evaluating the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the criteria issued by COSO in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal control over ~~financial~~ financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the year ~~quarter~~ ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our international control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions with the Company, dates of their initial election or appointment as a director or executive officer, and the expiration of the Board terms (if applicable) are as follows:

Name	Age	Position	Since
Yi He	4546	Chief Executive Officer ~~Chairman of the board of directors~~	May 2003 ~~August 2001~~
Hongkeung Lam	60	Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary and Director	August 2001
		Chairman of the board of directors	August 2001
Guoliang Tian	72	Director	May 2003
Hongkeung Lam	61	Chief Financial Officer, Chief	August 2001
Yu Fang	65	Director	May 2003
		Accounting Officer, Secretary and
		Director
Guoliang Tian	73	Director	May 2003
Yu Fang	66	Director	May 2003

Set forth below is a summary of our executive officers’ and directors’ business experience for the past 5 years. The experience and background of each of the directors, as summarized below, were significant factors in their previously being nominated as directors of the Company. Our directors hold office until their successors are elected and qualified. Our officers are appointed annually by the board of directors.

Yi He has been a director of the Company since August 2001, and the Chief Executive Officer since May 2003. Mr. He is the founder of Beijing SLAIT Science & Technology Development Limited Co., where he served as Chairman and President from January 1998 to August of 2001. From March 1993 to January 1998, Mr. He was the President of Beijing Sunny Computer System Engineering Co. Mr. He has a Master Degree in Computer Science from Peking University.

Hongkeung Lam has been the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary and a director of the Company since August 2001. From July 2000 to August 2001, Mr. Lam was the Chairman of Beijing Hi Sun In Soft Information Technology Ltd. From June 1998 to June 2000, Mr. Lam was the Chairman and President of Beijing Jinshili Information Technology Ltd. From 1992 to February 1998, Mr. Lam was the Manager of the Beijing office of Taiwan Acer Computer (Far East) Co.

Guoliang Tian has been a director of the Company since May 2003. Mr. Tian is a professor with the Institute of Remote Sensing Applications at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, where he has been employed since 1986, and he heads the study of natural disaster monitoring and assessment. His areas of expertise and studies involve the use of remote sensing data to research and monitor geographic and atmospheric changes. He has published 105 papers and 4 books. In 1965, Mr. Tian received a degree in physics from Jilin University of China.

Yu Fang has been a director of the Company since May 2003. Mr. Fang is a professor at Peking University, where he has been employed since 1987. He has served as the Vice Director of the Institute of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System at Peking University since 2001. From 1982 until 2000, he worked in the Department of Computer Science & Technology at Peking University, and served as Vice Chairman of the Department of Computer Science & Technology at Peking University from 1987 to 1999. His areas of expertise and studies are software engineering, geographic information systems, management information systems, and parallel processing and distribution systems. He has written 68 articles and 5 books. In 1982, Mr. Fang received a Masters Degree in Computer Science at Peking University after graduating from the Department of Mathematics at Peking University in 1968.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert Disclosure

We do not have a separately designated standing audit committee or an audit committee financial expert. The entire board of directors acts as our audit committee.

Code of Ethics

On August 3, 2004, the board of directors established a written code of ethics that applies to our senior executive and financial officers. A copy of the code of ethics is posted on our website at www.forlink.com.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Commission. Reporting persons are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on review of copies of such reports received or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that, during the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors, and 10% shareholders were timely filed, except the current officers and directors have inadvertently not timely filed their Form 3 filings.

Diversity

While we do not have a policy regarding diversity of its board members, diversity is one of a number of factors that is typically taken into account in identifying board nominees. We believe that we have a diverse board of directors in terms of previous business experience and educational and personal background of the members of our board.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The following summary compensation table indicates the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 by (i) our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), (ii) our Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), (iii) the three most highly compensated executive officers other than our CEO and CFO who were serving as executive officers at the end of our last completed fiscal year, whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during such fiscal year ends, and (iv) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at the end of our last completed fiscal year, whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during such fiscal year ends.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	~~Year~~	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		Option Awards ($)(2)		Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Yi He,		~~2011~~2012	$	43,924	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	43,924
CEO		~~2010~~2011	$	43,924	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	43,924
Hongkeung Lam,		~~2011~~2012	$	14,789	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	14,789
CFO		~~2010~~2011	$	14,789	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	14,789

Compensation of Directors

The Company paid no compensation to its directors for any services provided as a director during the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012. There are no other formal or informal understandings or arrangements relating to compensation, but the directors may be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred by them in conducting company business. These expenses would include out-of-pocket expenses for such items as travel, telephone, and postage. For the fiscal year ~~2011~~2012, none of the directors received reimbursement payments from the Company.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

We are a Nevada corporation, and we are subject to the corporate laws under the Nevada Revised Statutes. Article XII of our articles of incorporation contains the following indemnification provision for our directors and officers:

No director or officer of the Corporation shall be personally liable to the Corporation or any of its stockholders for damage for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer involving any act or omission of any such director or officer provided, however, that the foregoing provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer for acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, or the payment of dividends in violation of Section 78.300 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Any repeal or modification of this Article by the stockholders of the Corporation shall be prospective only, and shall not adversely affect any limitation on the personal liability of a director or officer of the Corporation to acts or omissions prior to such repeal or modification.

Such indemnification provision may be sufficiently broad to permit indemnification of our executive officers and directors for liabilities (including reimbursement of expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provision, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. No pending material litigation or proceeding involving our directors, executive officers, employees or other agents as to which indemnification is being sought exists, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened material litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any of our directors or executive officers.

We do not currently carry directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering our directors and officers, nor do we have plans to do so. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons controlling the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 2225, ~~2012~~2013, by: (i) each person known to beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock; (ii) each of our officers and directors; and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each director or executive officer is determined under rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under the SEC rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has the sole or shared voting power or investment power. In addition, beneficial ownership includes any shares that the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, each person listed below has sole investment and voting power (or shares such powers with his or her spouse). In certain instances, the number of shares listed includes (in addition to shares owned directly), shares held by the spouse or children of the person, or by a trust or estate of which the person is a trustee or an executor or in which the person may have a beneficial interest.

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership3			Percentage Owned Beneficially5
Common Stock	Yi He1		1,290,001			27.8	%
Common Stock	Hongkeung Lam1		525,000			11.3	%
Common Stock	Guoliang Tian1		0			—
Common Stock	Yu Fang1		0			—
Common Stock	Jing Zeng2		288,000			6.2	%
Common Stock	Statelink International Group, Ltd.2		650,~~000~~0004	4		14.0	%
Common Stock	All officers and directors of the Company as a group (4 persons)		21,~~465~~815,001			39.0	%

__________

¹ An officer and/or director of the Company. The address for each officer and director is in care of the Company at 9/F Shenzhou Mansion, No. 31 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

2 A beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock. The address for each such beneficial owner is in care of the Company at 9/F Shenzhou Mansion, No. 31 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

²A beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock. The address for each such beneficial owner is in care of the Company at 9/F Shenzhou Mansion, No. 31 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

³Unless otherwise indicated, all shares are directly owned and investing power is held by the persons named in the table.

⁴These shares of common stock are held directly by Statelink International Group, Ltd., of which Ms. Zhenying Sun is the controlling person and has both voting and dispositive power over these shares.

5 Based upon 4,651,173 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 2325, ~~2012~~2013.

Transactions with Related Person

The Company, from time to time, received from or made repayments to Mr. Yi He, who is a major stockholder and our Chief Executive Officer. The amounts due from/to stockholders do not bear any interest and do not have clearly defined terms of repayment. The amounts due to stockholders as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, which were $~~524~~369,~~668~~166 and $~~415~~260,~~078~~470, respectively, represented advances from stockholders.

Other than the transactions described above, we have not entered into any transactions with our officers, directors, persons nominated for these positions, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock, or family members of these persons since the beginning of our last fiscal year wherein the amount involved in the transaction or a series of similar transactions exceeded $120,000.

Director Independence

We have determined that Guoliang Tian and Yu Fang are independent directors under Nasdaq listing rules. In determining independence, the board reviews and determines whether directors have any material relationship with the Company, direct or indirect, that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Kenne Ruan, CPA, P.C. (“Kenne Ruan”) for the audit of our ~~2011~~2012 annual financial statements and the reviews of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the ~~2011~~2012 fiscal year was $91,737. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Kenne Ruan for the audit of our ~~2010~~2012 annual financial statements and the reviews of the financial statements included in our Form 10-Q for ~~2010~~2012 fiscal year was $100,000.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no other fees billed by Kenne Ruan during the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and not reported under “Audit Fees” above.

Tax Fees

There were no fees billed for professional services rendered by Kenne Ruan for tax compliance services during the last two fiscal years.

All Other Fees

There were no other fees billed by Kenne Ruan during the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by Kenne Ruan.

Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures

Our board reviews and approves audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our auditors, as well as the fees charged for such services. In reviewing the non-audit service fees and appointment of our auditors, the board considered whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence. All of the services provided and fees charged by our auditors were pre-approved by the board.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Financial Statements; Schedules

Our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 begin on page F-1 of this annual report. We are not required to file any financial statement schedules.

Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 of the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, and filed on May 15, 2000.)
3.2		Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.2 of the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, and filed on May 15, 2000.)
3.3		Text of Amendment to Bylaws of Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2007.)
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to Increase Number of Authorized Shares of Common Stock as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 4, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.2 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and filed on March 30, 2009.)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to Effect a 1-for-20 Reverse Stock Split as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on February 21, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.3 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and filed on March 30, 2009.)
10.1		Loan Agreement by and between the Company and China Mingsheng Bank Corp., Ltd., dated June 4, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, and filed on August 14, 2012).
14.1		Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 14 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and filed on March 30, 2009.)
21.1		List of Subsidiaries (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 21.1 of the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, and filed on April 2, 2007.)
24.1		Power of Attorney (see signature page)
31.1		Section 302 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. (Filed herewith.)
31.2		Section 302 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer. (Filed herewith.)
32.1		Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. (Filed herewith.)
32.2		Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer. (Filed herewith.)

SIGNATURES

32.1		Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. (Filed herewith.)

32.2		Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer. (Filed herewith.)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

	FORLINK SOFTWARE CORPORATION, INC.
	(Registrant)
Date: March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ Yi He
		Yi He
		Chief Executive Officer

* In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Date: March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ Hongkeung Lam
		Hongkeung Lam
		Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.SIGNATURES

Date: March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ Yi He
		Yi He, Chief Executive Officer
		(principal executive officer), Director

Date: March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ Hongkeung Lam
	FORLINK SOFTWARE CORPORATION, INC.
		Hongkeung Lam, Chief Financial
	(Registrant)
		and Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial and accounting officer), Director
Date: April 11, 2013	By:	/s/ Yi He
		Yi He
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ Guoliang Tian
Date: April 11, 2013	By:	/s/ Hongkeung Lam
		Guoliang Tian, Director
		Hongkeung Lam
		Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ Yu Fang
		Yu Fang, Director

POWER OF ATTORNEY

27KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Yi He and Hongkeung Lam and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, each with power to act alone, to sign and execute on behalf of the undersigned any and all amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to perform any acts necessary in order to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requested and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or their or his or her substitutes, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Date: April 11, 2013	By:	/s/ Yi He
		Yi He, Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer), Director

Date: April 11, 2013	By:	/s/ Hongkeung Lam
		Hongkeung Lam, Chief Financial
		and Chief Accounting Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), Director

Date: April 11, 2013	By:	/s/ Guoliang Tian
		Guoliang Tian, Director

Date: April 11, 2013	By:	/s/ Yu Fang
		Yu Fang, Director

Filing Compare · FORLINK SOFTWARE CORP INC