UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2011~~ 2012

Commission file number: 000-53191

MATTMAR MINERALS, INC

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware		20-4718599
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

133 Summit Avenue

Suite 22

Summit, NJ 07901

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (973) 635-4047

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes £ ¨ No Tx

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes £ ¨ No Tx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~Yes T No £~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes £ x No £¨

Indicate by check mark ifwhether ~~disclosure~~the ofregistrant has ~~delinquent~~submitted ~~filers~~electronically inand ~~response~~posted toon ~~Item~~its ~~405~~corporate ofWeb ~~Regulation~~site, ~~S-K~~if isany, ~~not~~every ~~contained~~Interactive ~~herein,~~Data ~~and~~File ~~will~~required ~~not~~to be ~~contained,~~submitted and posted pursuant to ~~the~~Rule ~~best~~405 of ~~registrant's~~Regulation ~~knowledge,~~S-T in(§232.405 ~~definitive~~of ~~proxy~~this orchapter) ~~information~~during ~~statements~~the ~~incorporated~~preceding by12 ~~reference~~months in(or ~~Part~~for ~~III~~such shorter ofperiod ~~this~~that ~~Form~~the ~~10-K~~registrant orwas ~~any~~required ~~amendment~~ to ~~this~~submit ~~Form~~and ~~10-K~~post such files). £

Yes x No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company.

Large accelerated filer £¨ Accelerated filer £¨ Non-accelerated filer £¨ Smaller reporting company Tx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ~~Yes x No £~~

AsYes ofx No November 30, 2010, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, no aggregate market value of the voting or non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates has been computed based on the fact that no active trading market had been established.¨

As of ~~August~~November 130, 2011, ~~1,333,334~~the ~~shares~~last business day of the registrant'’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, no aggregate market value of the voting or non-voting common ~~stock~~equity ~~were~~held ~~outstanding~~by non-affiliates has been computed based on the fact that no active trading market had been established.

As of September 7, 2012, 1,333,334 shares of the registrant's common stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

NONE.

MATTMAR MINERALS, INC

Form 10-K Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	9
Item 2.	Properties	9
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	9
Item 4.	~~[Removed~~Mine ~~and~~Safety ~~Reserved]~~Disclosure	9
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters ~~and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities~~	9
	and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	9
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	10
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	12
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	12
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting ~~and Financial Disclosure~~	12
	and Financial Disclosure	12
Item 9A.	Controls And Procedures	12
Item 9B.	Other Information	1213
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	13
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	14
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and ~~Related Stockholder Matters~~	15
	Related Stockholder Matters.	15
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	15
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	16
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.	16

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT INFORMATION

Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements” regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth herein under the headings “Business,” “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors”. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. The terms “we”, “our”, “us”, or any derivative thereof, as used herein refer to Mattmar Minerals, Inc

(ii)

PART 1

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS.

THE COMPANY’S HISTORY

Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “us,” “Mattmar” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on April 18, 2006. We were an exploration stage company that owned certain mineral rights in Canada. The rights were deemed to have limited value during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008. In May 2008, there was a change in control, as detailed below and we ceased our exploration activities and became a development stage company. Accordingly, our financial statements reflect our results in accordance with the disclosure requirements for a development stage company.

On September 19, 2008 (the “Reincorporation Date”), we reincorporated in the state of Delaware by merger with and into Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (“Mattmar Delaware”), a corporation we organized under the laws of the state of Delaware (the “Delaware Merger”). On the Reincorporation Date, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes and the Delaware General Corporate Laws, Mattmar was merged with and into Mattmar Delaware which became the surviving corporation and the officers, directors and shareholders of Mattmar became the officers, directors and stockholders of Mattmar Delaware without any change to their officership and/or directorship position(s), or beneficial ownership percentage, as may be applicable.

On the Reincorporation Date, we adopted the capital structure of Mattmar Delaware consisting of 100,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 99,000,000 shares are common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share and 1,000,000 shares are preferred stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. All issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock were automatically converted into the same number of shares of Mattmar Delaware common stock.

On July 30, 2009, the Company put into effect a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), on the basis of one (1) new share of Common Stock for each 10 shares of Common Stock outstanding. All references in these financial statements and notes to financial statements to number of shares, price per share and weighted average number of shares outstanding of Common Stock prior to this reverse stock split have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive basis unless otherwise noted.

CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP TRANSACTIONS

On May 9, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into two Securities Purchase Agreements. The first agreement (the "Company Agreement") was with Moyo Partners, LLC ("Moyo") and Kirk M. Warshaw ("Warshaw") as purchasers (each a "Purchaser" and collectively the "Purchasers"). The second agreement (the "Selling Stockholder Agreement") was by and among the Company, Sean Mitchell and R&R Biotech Partners, LLC ("R&R"). The two agreements are referred to collectively in this report as the "Agreements".

The closing of the transactions set forth in the Agreements was completed on May 12, 2008. Pursuant to the Company Agreement, Moyo and Warshaw purchased an aggregate of 246,667 shares of Common Stock for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $12,000.

Pursuant to the Selling Stockholder Agreement, Sean Mitchell, who immediately before the closing was our sole director, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and the owner of approximately 77% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, sold to R&R Biotech Partners, LLC, 786,667 shares of Common Stock for a price of $138,000 and returned to the Company for cancellation his remaining 213,333 shares of Common Stock.

Concurrently with the Agreements, Sean Mitchell, former shareholder and sole officer of the Company, forgave accounts payable due him in the amount of $7,794. Because Mr. Mitchell was no longer a stockholder or officer of the Company at the time of the debt forgiveness, the Company accounted for the debt forgiveness as a gain for the year ended May 31, 2008.

Also pursuant to the terms of the Agreements, on the Effective Date, Mr. Mitchell (i) elected Arnold P. Kling as the sole director of the Company and (ii) resigned as sole director and from all his positions with the Company. At the same time, Arnold P. Kling was appointed as President and Secretary of the Company, and Kirk Warshaw was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In September 2008, Mr. Warshaw replaced Mr. Kling as our Secretary.

Prior to the Closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreements, none of R&R, Moyo, nor Warshaw were affiliated with the Company. However, one or more of them may now be deemed affiliates of the Company as a result of stock ownership interests and director or officer elections made pursuant to the Agreements.

As of May 31, ~~2011~~2012, we had issued and outstanding 1,333,334 shares of Common Stock and no shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share (“Preferred Stock”). All issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

THE COMPANY TODAY

The Company is currently a development stage company reporting under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("FASB") No. 7, "Accounting and Reporting for Development Stage Enterprises."

Since May 9, 2008, our purpose has been to serve as a vehicle to acquire an operating business and we are currently considered a “shell” company inasmuch as we are not generating revenues, do not own an operating business, and have no specific plan other than to engage in a merger or acquisition transaction with a yet-to-be identified operating company or business. We have no employees and no material assets.

We currently have no definitive agreements or understandings with any prospective business combination candidates and there are no assurances that we will find a suitable business with which to combine. The implementation of our business objectives is wholly contingent upon a business combination and/or the successful sale of our securities. We intend to utilize the proceeds of any offering, any sales of equity securities or debt securities, bank and other borrowings or a combination of those sources to effect a business combination with a target business which we believe may have significant growth potential. While we may, under certain circumstances, seek to effect business combinations with more than one target business, unless additional financing is obtained, we will not have sufficient proceeds remaining after an initial business combination to undertake additional business combinations.

A common reason for a target company to enter into a merger with a shell company is the desire to establish a public trading market for its shares. Such a company would hope to avoid the perceived adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself, such as the time delays and significant expenses incurred to comply with the various federal and state securities law that regulate initial public offerings.

As a result of our limited resources, unless and until additional financing is obtained we expect to have sufficient proceeds to effect only a single business combination. Accordingly, the prospects for our success will be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business. Unlike certain entities that have the resources to consummate several business combinations or entities operating in multiple industries or multiple segments of a single industry, we will not have the resources to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses. A target business may be dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services, in which case there will be an even higher risk that the target business will not prove to be commercially viable.

Our officers are only required to devote a very small portion of their time (less than 10%) to our affairs on a part-time or as-needed basis. Our officers may be entitled to receive compensation from a target company they identify or provide services in connection with a business combination. We expect to use outside consultants, advisors, attorneys and accountants as necessary, none of which will be hired on a retainer basis. We do not anticipate hiring any full-time employees so long as we are seeking and evaluating business opportunities.

We do not expect our present management to play any managerial role for us following a business combination. Although we intend to scrutinize closely the management of a prospective target business in connection with our evaluation of a business combination with a target business, our assessment of management may be incorrect.

In evaluating a prospective target business, we will consider several factors, including the following:

experience and skill of management and availability of additional personnel of the target business;

costs associated with effecting the business combination;

equity interest retained by our stockholders in the merged entity;

growth potential of the target business;

capital requirements of the target business;

capital available to the target business;

stage of development of the target business;

proprietary features and degree of intellectual property or other protection of the target business;

the financial statements of the target business; and

the regulatory environment in which the target business operates.

The foregoing criteria are not intended to be exhaustive and any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular target business will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors, as well as other considerations we deem relevant. In connection with our evaluation of a prospective target business, we anticipate that we will conduct a due diligence review which will encompass, among other things, meeting with incumbent management as well as a review of financial, legal and other information.

The time and costs required to select and evaluate a target business (including conducting a due diligence review) and to structure and consummate the business combination (including negotiating and documenting relevant agreements and preparing requisite documents for filing pursuant to applicable corporate and securities laws) cannot be determined at this time. Our president intends to devote only a very small portion of his time to our affairs, and, accordingly, the consummation of a business combination may require a longer time than if he devoted his full time to our affairs. However, he will devote such time as he deems reasonably necessary to carry out our business and affairs. The amount of time devoted to our business and affairs may vary significantly depending upon, among other things, whether we have identified a target business or are engaged in active negotiation of a business combination.

We anticipate that various prospective target businesses will be brought to our attention from various sources, including securities broker-dealers, investment bankers, venture capitalists, bankers and other members of the financial community, including, possibly, the executive officers and our affiliates.

As a general rule, federal and state tax laws and regulations have a significant impact upon the structuring of business combinations. We will evaluate the possible tax consequences of any prospective business combination and will endeavor to structure a business combination so as to achieve the most favorable tax treatment to our company, the target business and our respective stockholders. There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service or relevant state tax authorities will ultimately assent to our tax treatment of a particular consummated business combination. To the extent the Internal Revenue Service or any relevant state tax authorities ultimately prevail in recharacterizing the tax treatment of a business combination, there may be adverse tax consequences to our company, the target business, and our respective stockholders.

We may acquire a company or business by purchasing the securities of such company or business. However, we do not intend to engage primarily in such activities. Specifically, we intend to conduct our activities so as to avoid being classified as an "investment company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Act”) and therefore avoid application of the costly and restrictive registration and other provisions of the Investment Company Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act excepts from the definition of an "investment company" an entity which does not engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, or which does not engage in the business of investing, owning, holding or trading "investment securities" (defined as "all securities other than government securities or securities of majority-owned subsidiaries") the value of which exceed 40% of the value of its total assets (excluding government securities, cash or cash items). We intend to operate any business in the future in a manner which will result in the availability of this exception from the definition of an investment company. Consequently, our acquisition of a company or business through the purchase and sale of investment securities will be limited. Although we intend to act to avoid classification as an investment company, the provisions of the Investment Company Act are extremely complex and it is possible that we may be classified as an inadvertent investment company. We intend to vigorously resist classification as an investment company, and to take advantage of any exemptions or exceptions from application of the Investment Company Act, which allows an entity a one-time option during any three-year period to claim an exemption as a "transient" investment company. The necessity of asserting any such resistance, or making any claim of exemption, could be time consuming and costly, or even prohibitive, given our limited resources.

Various impediments to a business combination may arise, such as appraisal rights afforded the stockholders of a target business under the laws of its state of organization. This may prove to be deterrent to a particular combination.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING FACTORS IN EVALUATING OUR BUSINESS, OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION. ADDITIONAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN TO US, THAT WE CURRENTLY DEEM IMMATERIAL OR THAT ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FACED BY OTHER COMPANIES IN OUR INDUSTRY OR BUSINESS IN GENERAL, SUCH AS COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS, MAY ALSO IMPAIR OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS. THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

WE HAVE NO RECENT OPERATING HISTORY OR BASIS FOR EVALUATING PROSPECTS.

Since the Effective Date, we have no operating business or plans to develop one. We are currently seeking to enter into a merger or business combination with another company. To date, our efforts have been limited to meeting our regulatory filing requirements and searching for a merger target.

WEWe Have ~~HAVE~~Limited ~~LIMITED~~Resources ~~RESOURCES~~and ~~AND~~No NORevenues ~~REVENUES~~From ~~FROM OPERATIONS~~Operations, ~~AND~~and WILL ~~NEED~~Need ~~ADDITIONAL~~Additional ~~FINANCING~~Financing INin ~~ORDER~~Order TOto ~~EXECUTE~~Execute ANY ~~BUSINESS~~Business ~~PLAN~~Plan.

We have limited resources, no revenues from operations to date and our cash on hand may not be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements during the next twelve months. In addition, we will not achieve any revenues (other than insignificant investment income) until, at the earliest, the consummation of a merger and we cannot ascertain our capital requirements until such time. Further limiting our abilities to achieve revenues, in order to avoid status as an "Investment Company" under the Investment Company Act, we can only invest our funds prior to a merger in limited investments which do not invoke Investment Company status. There can be no assurance that determinations ultimately made by us will permit us to achieve our business objectives.

WEWe Will ~~WILL~~Be BEAble ~~ABLE~~to TOEffect ~~EFFECT~~At ATMost ~~MOST~~One ~~ONE MERGER~~Merger, ~~AND~~and ~~THUS~~Thus ~~MAY~~May ~~NOT~~Not ~~HAVE~~Have Aa ~~DIVERSIFIED~~Diversified ~~BUSINESS~~Business.

Our resources are limited and we will most likely have the ability to effect only a single merger. This probable lack of diversification will subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a material adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to the consummation of a merger. We will become dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

WEWe Depend ~~DEPEND~~ SUBSTANTIALLY ~~UPON~~upon OUR PRESIDENT, ~~WHOSE~~Whose ~~EXPERIENCE~~Experience ISIs ~~LIMITED~~Limited, TOto ~~MAKE~~Make ~~ALL~~All ~~MANAGEMENT~~Management ~~DECISIONS~~Decisions.

Our ability to effect a merger will be dependent upon the efforts of our president, Arnold Kling. Notwithstanding the importance of Mr. Kling, we have not entered into any employment agreement or other understanding with Mr. Kling concerning compensation or obtained any "key man" life insurance on any of his life. The loss of the services of Mr. Kling will have a material adverse effect on our business objectives and success. We rely upon the expertise of Mr. Kling and do not anticipate that we will hire additional personnel.

THERE MAY BE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN OUR MANAGEMENT AND OUR NON-MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS.

Conflicts of interest create the risk that management may have an incentive to act adversely to the interests of other investors. Our officers may be entitled to receive compensation from a target company they identify or provide services to in connection with a business combination. A conflict of interest may arise between our management’s personal pecuniary interest and their fiduciary duty to our stockholders. Further, our management’s own pecuniary interest may at some point compromise their fiduciary duty to our stockholders. In addition, Mr. Kling, our president and sole director, and Mr. Warshaw, our chief financial officer, are currently involved with other blank check offerings and conflicts in the pursuit of business combinations with such other blank check companies with which they and affiliates of our majority stockholder are, and may in the future be affiliated with, may arise. If we and the other blank check companies that our officers and directors are affiliated with desire to take advantage of the same opportunity, then those officers and directors that are affiliated with both companies would abstain from voting upon the opportunity. Further, Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, a registered broker-dealer and affiliate of our majority stockholder (“Rodman & Renshaw”), may act as investment banker, placement agent or financial consultant to us in connection with a potential business combination transaction and may receive a fee and/or securities for such services. We cannot assure you that conflicts of interest among us, our management, Rodman & Renshaw and our stockholders will not develop.

THERE IS COMPETITION FOR THOSE PRIVATE COMPANIES SUITABLE FOR A MERGER TRANSACTION OF THE TYPE CONTEMPLATED BY MANAGEMENT.

We are in a highly competitive market for a small number of business opportunities which could reduce the likelihood of consummating a successful business combination. We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures with and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including small public companies and venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be desirable target candidates for us. Nearly all these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we do; consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. These competitive factors may reduce the likelihood of our identifying and consummating a successful business combination.

FUTURE SUCCESS IS HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON THE ABILITY OF MANAGEMENT TO LOCATE AND ATTRACT A SUITABLE ACQUISITION.

The nature of our operations is highly speculative. The success of our plan of operation will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the identified business opportunity. While management intends to seek business combination(s) with entities having established operating histories, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in locating candidates meeting that criterion. In the event we complete a business combination, the success of our operations may be dependent upon management of the successor firm or venture partner firm and numerous other factors beyond our control.

WE HAVE NO AGREEMENT FOR A BUSINESS COMBINATION OR OTHER TRANSACTION.

We have no agreement with respect to engaging in a merger with, joint venture with or acquisition of, a private or public entity. No assurances can be given that we will successfully identify and evaluate suitable business opportunities or that we will conclude a business combination. Management has not identified any particular industry or specific business within an industry for evaluation. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to negotiate a business combination on favorable terms, and there is consequently a risk that funds allocated to the purchase of our shares will not be invested in a company with active business operations.

MANAGEMENT WILL CHANGE UPON THE CONSUMMATION OF A MERGER.

After the closing of a merger or business combination, it is likely our current management will not retain any control or managerial responsibilities. Upon such event, Mr. Kling and Mr. Warshaw intend to resign from their positions with us.

CURRENT STOCKHOLDERS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY AND SUBSTANTIALLY DILUTED UPON A MERGER OR BUSINESS COMBINATION.

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 99,000,000 shares of Common Stock and a maximum of 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. Any merger or acquisition effected by us may result in the issuance of additional securities without shareholder approval and may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our Common Stock held by our then existing shareholders. Moreover, the Common Stock issued in any such merger or acquisition transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm’s-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of Common Stock held by our then existing shareholders. Our Board of Directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without shareholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock are issued in connection with a business combination or otherwise, dilution to the interests of our shareholders will occur and the rights of the holders of Common Stock might be materially adversely affected.

CONTROL BY EXISTING STOCKHOLDER.

R&R beneficially owns 59% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. As a result, this stockholder is able to exercise control over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, and the approval of mergers, consolidations and sales of all or substantially all of our assets.

OUR COMMON STOCK IS A "PENNY STOCK" WHICH MAY RESTRICT THE ABILITY OF STOCKHOLDERS TO SELL OUR COMMON STOCK IN THE SECONDARY MARKET.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted regulations which generally define "penny stock" to be an equity security that has a market price, as defined, of less than $5.00 per share, or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions, including an exception of an equity security that is quoted on a national securities exchange. Our Common Stock is not now quoted on a national exchange but is traded on Nasdaq’s OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”). Thus, they are subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell these securities. For example, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser of such securities and have received the purchaser's written consent to the transactions prior to the purchase. Additionally, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered underwriter, and current quotations for the securities, and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer's presumed control over the market. Finally, among other requirements, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. The "penny stock" rules, may restrict the ability of our stockholders to sell our Common Stock and warrants in the secondary market.

OUR COMMON STOCK HAS BEEN THINLY TRADED, LIQUIDITY IS LIMITED, AND WE MAY BE UNABLE TO OBTAIN LISTING OF OUR COMMON STOCK ON A MORE LIQUID MARKET.

Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTCBB, which provides significantly less liquidity than a securities exchange such as the NYSE ~~Amex~~MKT, New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq Global Market or Capital Market. There is uncertainty that we will ever be accepted for a listing on a national securities exchange.

Often there is currently a limited volume of trading in our Common Stock, and on many days there has been no trading activity at all. The purchasers of shares of our Common Stock may find it difficult to resell their shares at prices quoted in the market or at all.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES.

Our principal offices are located at 133 Summit Avenue, Suite 22, Summit, New Jersey which are owned by Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC (the “LLC”), an affiliated company of Kirk Warshaw, our chief financial officer and secretary. We occupy our principal offices on a month to month basis. On January 1, 2009, we began paying a quarterly fee of $500 to the LLC for the use and occupancy, and administrative services, related to our principal offices. We do not own or intend to invest in any real property. We currently have no policy with respect to investments or interests in real estate, real estate mortgages or securities of, or interests in, persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

None.

ITEM 4. ~~[REMOVED~~ MINE SAFETY ~~AND RESERVED~~DISCLOSURE.]

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR OUR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

(a) Market Information. Our Common Stock is traded on the OTCBB market under the symbol "~~MTTM~~MTMS". To date, there has not been an active trading market.

(b) Holders. As of ~~July~~September 181, ~~2011~~2012, there were 25 record holders of all of our issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.

(c) Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of the Board and will depend on our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial condition and such other factors as the Board may consider.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

As a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we are not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

GENERAL

We are a development stage corporation with limited operations and have very limited revenues from our business operations since our incorporation in April 2006. We were an exploration stage company that owned certain mineral rights in Canada. The rights were deemed to have limited value during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008. In May 2008, there was a change in control, as detailed below and we ceased our exploration activities and became a development stage company. Accordingly, our financial statements reflect our results in accordance with the disclosure requirements for a development stage company.

As of May 2008, we discontinued our mining efforts, we have no employees and our main purpose has been to effect a business combination with an operating business which we believe has significant growth potential. As of yet, we have no definitive agreements or understandings with any prospective business combination candidates and there are no assurances that we will find a suitable business with which to combine. The implementation of our business objectives is wholly contingent upon a business combination and/or the successful sale of our securities. We intend to utilize the proceeds of any offering, any sales of equity securities or debt securities, bank and other borrowings or a combination of those sources to effect a business combination with a target business which we believe has significant growth potential. While we may, under certain circumstances, seek to effect business combinations with more than one target business, unless and until additional financing is obtained, we will not have sufficient proceeds remaining after an initial business combination to undertake additional business combinations.

A common reason for a target company to enter into a merger with us is the desire to establish a public trading market for its shares. Such a company would hope to avoid the perceived adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself, such as the time delays and significant expenses incurred to comply with the various Federal and state securities law that regulate initial public offerings.

As a result of our limited resources, we expect to have sufficient proceeds to effect only a single business combination. Accordingly, the prospects for our success will be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business. Unlike certain entities that have the resources to consummate several business combinations or entities operating in multiple industries or multiple segments of a single industry, we will not have the resources to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses. A target business may be dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services, in which case there will be an even higher risk that the target business will not prove to be commercially viable.

Our officers are only required to devote a small portion of their time (less than 10%) to our affairs on a part-time or as-needed basis. We expect to use outside consultants, advisors, attorneys and accountants as necessary. We do not anticipate hiring any full-time employees so long as we are seeking and evaluating business opportunities.

We expect our present management to play no managerial role in our company following a business combination. Although we intend to scrutinize closely the management of a prospective target business in connection with our evaluation of a business combination with a target business, our assessment of management may be incorrect. We cannot assure you that we will find a suitable business with which to combine.

Our principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with an operating business. We will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business. The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of our officers and directors.

EQUIPMENT AND EMPLOYEES

As of May 31, ~~2011~~2012, we had no operating business, no equipment, and no employees. We do not intend to develop our own operating business but instead plan to merge with another operating company.

Results of Operations

Continuing Operating Expenses for the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, ~~2011~~2012 Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, ~~2010~~2011

We are a development stage corporation with limited operations and did not have any revenues during the fiscal years ended May 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively.

Total expenses from Continuing Operations for the fiscal years ended May 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 were $1524,~~875~~568 and $3015,~~750~~875, respectively. These expenses primarily constituted general and administrative expenses related to accounting and compliance with the Exchange Act. The increase ~~decrease~~ in expenses in ~~2011~~2012 is due to a general ~~decrease~~increase in professional and administrative fees.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At May 31, ~~2011~~2012, we did not have any revenues from operations. Our principal source of operating capital recently has been provided in the form of loans and capital contributions from our stockholders. Absent a merger or other combination with an operating company, we do not expect to have any revenues from operations. No assurance can be given that such a merger or other combination will occur or that we can engage in any public or private sales of our equity or debt securities to raise working capital. We are dependent upon future loans or capital contributions from our present stockholders and/or management and there can be no assurances that our present stockholders or management will make any loans or capital contributions to us. At May 31, ~~2011~~2012, we had cash of $1214,~~404~~345 and working capital of $811,~~239~~671.

Our present material commitments are professional and administrative fees and expenses associated with the preparation of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and other regulatory requirements. In the event that we engage in any merger or other combination with an operating company, it is likely that we will have additional material commitments.

Commitments

We do not have any commitments which are required to be disclosed in tabular form as of May 31, ~~2011~~2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of May 31, ~~2011~~2012, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements such as guarantees, retained or contingent interest in assets transferred, obligation under a derivative instrument and obligation arising out of or a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

See the index to the Financial Statements below, beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our president and chief financial officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, the president and chief financial officer concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, including our president and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, management’s evaluation of controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Mattmar have been detected.

(b) Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, ~~2011~~2012. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of May 31, ~~2011~~2012, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

~~PART~~ITEM ~~III~~9B. OTHER INFORMATION

~~ITEM 10~~None. ~~DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.~~

~~The following table sets forth information concerning our officers and directors as of August 1, 2011:~~PART III

Name	Age	Title
Arnold P. Kling	53	President and director
Kirk M. Warshaw	53	Chief financial officer and secretary

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

~~Arnold~~The P.following ~~Kling. Mr.~~table ~~Kling~~sets ~~has~~forth ~~served~~information concerning as our ~~president~~officers and adirectors ~~director since May 2008. Mr. Kling is currently a Managing Director of GH Venture Partners, LLC, a private equity and merchant banking boutique for which he also served~~ as ~~a Managing Director and General Counsel from 1995 to 1999. From 1999 through August 2005, Mr. Kling was the President~~ of ~~Adelphia~~September ~~Holdings~~1, LLC, a merchant-banking firm, as well as the managing member of several private investment funds. From 1993 to 1995 he was a senior executive and general counsel of a Nasdaq listed licensing and multimedia company. From 1990 through 1993, Mr. Kling was an associate and partner in the corporate and financial services department of Tannenbaum, Helpern, Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP, a mid-size New York law firm. Mr. Kling received a Bachelor of Science degree from New York University in International Business in 1980 and a Juris Doctor degree from Benjamin Cardozo School of Law in 1983. During the past five years, Mr. Kling was a Director of Enthrust Financial Services, Inc., n/k/a Rodman & Renshaw Capital Group, Inc. (NASDAQ2012: RODM). Mr. Kling currently also serves as a Director and President of R&R Acquisition, VI, Inc., R&R Acquisition, VII, Inc., R&R Acquisition, VIII, Inc., Rodman International Enterprises I, Ltd., and Rodman International Enterprise II, Ltd., (each a publicly reporting, non-trading company), 24Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB:TWFH) and Protalex, Inc. (OTCBB: PRTX). Mr. Kling’s professional experience and background with other companies and with us, as our president and director since 2007, have given him the expertise needed to serve as our director.

Kirk M. Warshaw. Mr. Warshaw has served as our chief financial officer since May 2008 and secretary since September 2008. Mr. Warshaw is a financial professional who, since 1990, has provided clients in a multitude of different industries with advice on accounting, corporate finance, and general business matters. Prior to starting his own consulting firm, from 1983 to 1990, he held the various titles of Controller, Chief Financial Officer, President, and Chief Executive Officer at three separate financial institutions in New Jersey. From 1980 through 1983, Mr. Warshaw was a Senior Accountant at the public accounting firm of Deloitte, Haskins & Sells. Mr. Warshaw is a 1980 graduate of Lehigh University and has been a CPA in New Jersey since 1982. During the past five years, Mr. Warshaw was a Director of Empire Financial Holding Company, n/k/a Jesup & Lamont, Inc. (OTC Pink: JLIC). Mr. Warshaw is currently also the Chief Financial Officer of R&R Acquisition, VI, Inc., R&R Acquisition, VII, Inc., R&R Acquisition, VIII, Inc., Rodman International Enterprises I, Ltd., and Rodman International Enterprise II, Ltd. (each a publicly reporting, non-trading company) and Protalex, Inc. (OTCBB: PRTX), and a Director and the Chief Financial Officer of 24Holdings Inc. (OTCBB: TWFH).

Name	Age	Title
Arnold P. Kling	54	President and director
Kirk M. Warshaw	54	Chief financial officer and secretary

Arnold P. Kling. Mr. Kling has served as our president and a director since May 2008. Mr. ~~Warshaw~~Kling ~~are~~is ~~not~~currently ~~required~~a Managing Director of GH Venture Partners, LLC, a private equity boutique for which he also served as a Managing Director and General Counsel from 1995 to ~~commit~~1999. ~~their~~From ~~full~~1999 ~~time~~through August 2005, Mr. Kling was the President of Adelphia Holdings, LLC, a merchant-banking firm, as well as the managing member of several private investment funds. From 1993 to ~~our~~1995 ~~business~~he ~~affairs~~was a senior executive and ~~they~~general ~~will~~counsel ~~not~~of a ~~devote~~Nasdaq listed licensing and multimedia company. From 1990 through 1993, Mr. Kling was an associate and partner in the corporate and financial services department of Tannenbaum, Helpern, Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP, a ~~substantial~~mid-size ~~amount~~New York law firm. Mr. Kling received a Bachelor of ~~time~~Science todegree from New York University in International Business in 1980 and a Juris Doctor degree from Benjamin Cardozo School of Law in 1983. During the past five years, Mr. Kling was a director of Enthrust Financial Services, Inc., n/k/a Direct Markets Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: MKTS). Mr. Kling currently also serves as a Director and President of 24Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB:TWFH), Newtown Lane Marketing, Incorporated (OTCBB: NTWN) and Protalex, Inc. (OTCQB: PRTX). Mr. Kling’s professional experience and background with other companies and with us, as our president ~~business~~and ~~affairs~~director since 2007, have given him the expertise needed to serve as our director.

~~Compensation~~Kirk M. Warshaw. Mr. Warshaw has served as our chief financial officer since May 2008 and ~~Audit~~secretary ~~Committees~~since September 2008. Mr. Warshaw is a financial professional who, since 1990, has provided clients in a multitude of different industries with advice on accounting, corporate finance, and general business matters. Prior to starting his own consulting firm, from 1983 to 1990, he held the various titles of controller, Chief Financial Officer, President, and chief executive officer at three separate financial institutions in New Jersey. From 1980 through 1983, Mr. Warshaw was a Senior Accountant at the public accounting firm of Deloitte, Haskins & Sells. Mr. Warshaw is a 1980 graduate of Lehigh University and has been a CPA in New Jersey since 1982. During the past five years, Mr. Warshaw was a director of Empire Financial Holding Company, n/k/a Jesup & Lamont, Inc. (OTC Pink: JLIC). Mr. Warshaw is currently also the Chief Financial Officer of Newtown Lane Marketing, Incorporated (OTCBB: NTWN), and a Director and the Chief Financial Officer of 24Holdings Inc. (OTCBB: TWFH) and Protalex, Inc. (OTCQB: PRTX).

AsMr. weKling ~~only have one Board member~~ and ~~given~~Mr. ~~our~~Warshaw ~~limited~~are ~~operations, we do~~ not ~~have~~required to ~~separate~~commit ortheir ~~independent~~full ~~audit~~time orto ~~compensation~~our ~~committees. Our~~business ~~Board~~affairs ~~has~~and ~~determined~~they ~~that~~will ~~it does~~ not ~~have~~devote ana ~~"audit~~substantial ~~committee~~amount ~~financial expert," as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)~~ of ~~Regulation~~time ~~S-K. In addition, we have not adopted any procedures by which our stockholders may recommend nominees~~ to our ~~Board~~business affairs.

13Compensation and Audit Committees

~~Section~~As 16we only have one Board member and given our limited operations, we do not have separate or independent audit or compensation committees. Our Board has determined that it does not have an "audit committee financial expert," as that term is defined in Item 407(ad)(5) ~~Beneficial~~of ~~Ownership~~Regulation ~~Reporting~~S-K. In ~~Compliance~~addition, we have not adopted any procedures by which our stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our Common Stock (collectively, the "Reporting Persons") to report their ownership of and transactions in our Common Stock to the SEC. Copies of these reports are also required to be supplied to us. To our knowledge, during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 the Reporting Persons complied with all applicable Section 16(a) reporting requirements.13

~~Code~~Section of16(a) ~~Ethics~~Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

WeSection ~~have~~16(a) ~~not~~of ~~adopted~~the aExchange ~~Code~~Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of ~~Ethics~~our ~~given~~Common Stock (collectively, the "Reporting Persons") to report their ownership of and transactions in our ~~limited~~Common ~~operations~~Stock to the SEC. WeCopies ~~expect~~of ~~that~~these reports ~~following~~are aalso ~~merger~~required orto ~~other~~be ~~acquisition~~supplied ~~transaction,~~to us. To our ~~Board~~knowledge, ~~will~~during ~~adopt~~the afiscal ~~Code~~year ofended ~~Ethics~~May 31, 2012 the Reporting Persons complied with all applicable Section 16(a) reporting requirements.

~~ITEM~~Code ~~11. EXECUTIVE~~of ~~COMPENSATION.~~Ethics

~~Messrs.~~We ~~Kling~~have ~~and~~not ~~Warshaw~~adopted ~~are~~a ~~our~~Code ~~sole~~of ~~officers~~Ethics ~~and Mr. Kling is~~ given our ~~sole~~limited ~~director~~operations. ~~Neither~~ ~~receives~~We ~~any~~expect ~~regular~~that ~~compensation~~following ~~for~~a ~~their~~merger ~~services~~or ~~rendered~~other onacquisition ~~our behalf. Neither Mr. Kling nor Mr. Warshaw received any compensation during the years ended May 31~~transaction, ~~2011~~our ~~and~~Board ~~2010. No~~will ~~officer~~adopt ora ~~director~~Code ~~is required to make any specific amount or percentage~~ of ~~his business time available to us~~Ethics.

~~While~~ITEM we do not presently anticipate engaging the services of professional firms that specialize in finding business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may engage such firms in the future, in which event we may be required to pay a finder's fee or other compensation11. InEXECUTIVE ~~no event, however, will we pay a finder's fee or commission to any of our officers and directors or any entity with which an officer or director is affiliated~~COMPENSATION. ~~We do not have any incentive or stock option plan in effect.~~

~~Director~~Messrs. ~~Compensation~~Kling and Warshaw are our sole officers and Mr. Kling is our sole director. Neither receives any regular compensation for their services rendered on our behalf. Neither Mr. Kling nor Mr. Warshaw received any compensation during the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. No officer or director is required to make any specific amount or percentage of his business time available to us.

WeWhile we do not ~~currently~~presently ~~pay~~anticipate engaging the services of professional firms that specialize in finding business acquisitions on any ~~cash~~formal ~~fees~~basis, we may engage such firms in the future, in which event we may be required to ~~our~~pay ~~sole~~a ~~director~~finder's fee or other compensation. In no event, ~~nor~~however, dowill we pay a ~~director’~~finder's ~~expenses~~fee inor ~~attending~~commission ~~Board~~to ~~meetings~~any of our officers and directors or any entity with which an officer or director is affiliated. We do not have any incentive or stock option plan in effect.

~~Employment~~Director ~~Agreements~~Compensation

We ~~are~~do not acurrently ~~party~~pay any cash fees to ~~any~~our ~~employment~~sole ~~agreements~~director, nor do we pay director’s expenses in attending Board meetings.

14Employment Agreements

~~ITEM~~We ~~12.~~are ~~SECURITY~~not ~~OWNERSHIP~~a OFparty ~~CERTAIN~~to ~~BENEFICIAL~~any ~~OWNERS~~employment ~~AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS~~agreements.

The following table sets forth certain information as of August 1, 2011 regarding the number and percentage of our Common Stock (being our only voting securities) beneficially owned by each officer and the sole director, each person (including any "group" as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known by us to own 5% or more of our Common Stock, and all officers and the sole director as a group.14

Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)		Percentage of Ownership
R&R Biotech Partners, LLC 1251 Avenue of the Americas – 20th Floor New York, NY 10020 Attention: David Horin, CFO		786,667		59.0	%
Moyo Partners, LLC (2) c/o Arnold P. Kling 410 Park Avenue - Suite 1710 New York, NY 10022		193,334		14.5	%
Arnold P. Kling (3) 410 Park Avenue - Suite 1710 New York, NY 10022		193,334		14.5	%
Kirk M. Warshaw (4) 133 Summit Avenue, Suite 22 Summit, NJ 07901		53,333		4.0	%
All Directors and Officers (2 persons) as a group		246,667		18.5	%

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

~~(1)~~The ~~Unless~~following ~~otherwise~~table ~~indicated,~~sets weforth ~~have~~certain information ~~been~~as ~~advised~~of ~~that~~September ~~all~~1, ~~individuals~~2012 orregarding ~~entities listed have~~ the ~~sole~~number ~~power to vote~~ and ~~dispose~~percentage of ~~the~~our ~~number~~Common ofStock ~~shares~~(being ~~set~~our ~~forth~~only ~~opposite~~voting ~~their names. For purposes of computing the number and percentage of shares~~ securities) beneficially owned by aeach ~~security~~officer ~~holder,~~and ~~any~~the ~~shares~~sole ~~which~~director, ~~such~~each person ~~has~~(including ~~the~~any ~~right~~"group" toas ~~acquire~~that ~~within~~term 60is ~~days~~used ofin Section ~~August~~13(d)(3) 1,of ~~2011~~the ~~are~~Exchange ~~deemed~~Act) toknown beby ~~outstanding,~~us ~~but~~to ~~those~~own ~~shares~~5% ~~are~~or ~~not~~more ~~deemed~~of toour beCommon ~~outstanding~~Stock, ~~for~~and ~~the~~all ~~purpose~~officers ofand ~~computing~~ the ~~percentage~~sole ~~ownership~~director as ofa ~~any other security holder~~group.

(2) Arnold P. Kling, our president and sole director, controls Moyo Partners, LLC and therefore is the beneficial owner of the shares held by this entity.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)		Percentage of Ownership
R&R Biotech Partners, LLC 1251 Avenue of the Americas – 20^thFloor New York, NY 10020 Attention: David Horin, CFO		786,667		59.0	%

Moyo Partners, LLC (2) c/o Arnold P. Kling 410 Park Avenue - Suite 1710 New York, NY 10022		193,334		14.5	%

Arnold P. Kling (3) 410 Park Avenue - Suite 1710 New York, NY 10022		193,334		14.5	%

Kirk M. Warshaw (4) 133 Summit Avenue, Suite 22 Summit, NJ 07901		53,333		4.0	%

All Directors and Officers (2 persons) as a group		246,667		18.5	%

(31) ~~Includes~~Unless otherwise indicated, we have been advised that all individuals or entities listed have the sole power to vote and dispose of the number of shares ~~held~~set forth opposite their names. For purposes of computing the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by ~~Moyo~~a ~~Partners~~security holder, ~~LLC~~any shares which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of September 1, 2012 are deemed to be outstanding, but those shares are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other security holder.

(42) MrArnold P. ~~Warshaw~~Kling, is our ~~chief~~president and ~~financial~~sole ~~officer~~director, controls Moyo Partners, LLC and ~~secretary~~therefore is the beneficial owner of the shares held by this entity.

We(3) ~~currently~~Includes doall ~~not~~the ~~have~~shares ~~any~~held ~~equity~~by ~~compensation~~Moyo ~~plans~~Partners, LLC.

~~ITEM~~(4) 13Mr. ~~CERTAIN~~Warshaw ~~RELATIONSHIPS~~is ~~AND~~our ~~RELATED~~chief ~~TRANSACTIONS,~~financial ~~AND~~officer ~~DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE~~and secretary.

~~Our~~We ~~Board~~currently ~~consists~~do ~~solely of Arnold Kling. He is~~ not ~~independent~~have asany ~~such~~equity ~~term~~compensation ~~is defined by a national securities exchange or an inter-dealer quotation system~~plans. ~~During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011, R&R Biotech Partners, LLC contributed capital to us in the amount of $21,000.~~

OnITEM ~~January 29, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Kirk M~~13. ~~Warshaw,~~CERTAIN ~~LLC~~RELATIONSHIPS ~~(the~~AND ~~“LLC”)~~RELATED ~~for the use and occupancy~~TRANSACTIONS, ~~and~~AND ~~administrative~~DIRECTOR ~~services, related to our principal offices~~INDEPENDENCE. The agreement provides for quarterly payments from us to the LLC of $500. The effective date of the agreement is January 1, 2009. Kirk Warshaw, our chief financial officer, is a managing member of the LLC.

~~ITEM~~Our 14Board consists solely of Arnold Kling. ~~PRINCIPAL~~ ~~ACCOUNTANT~~He ~~FEES~~is ~~AND~~not ~~SERVICES~~independent as such term is defined by a national securities exchange or an inter-dealer quotation system. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, R&R Biotech Partners, LLC contributed capital to us in the amount of $28,000.

~~AUDIT~~On ~~FEES:~~January 29, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC (the “LLC”) for the use and occupancy, and administrative services, related to our principal offices. The agreement provides for quarterly payments from us to the LLC of $500. The effective date of the agreement is January 1, 2009. Kirk Warshaw, our chief financial officer, is a managing member of the LLC.

WeITEM ~~incurred~~14. ~~audit~~PRINCIPAL ~~and~~ACCOUNTANT ~~financial~~FEES ~~statement~~AND ~~review fees totaling $8,500 and $8,500 to De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC, our current independent accountants, for the years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively~~SERVICES.

~~AUDIT-RELATED~~Effective ~~FEES:~~on June 25, 2012, we dismissed De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC (“De Joya”) from serving as our independent registered public accounting firm and engaged Sherb & Co., LLP (“Sherb”) as our new independent registered public accounting firm. The Board unanimously approved and authorized the change, directed the process of review of candidate firms to replace De Joya and made the final decision to engage Sherb. There were no disagreements, adverse opinions or disclaimer of opinion by De Joya at the time of the change or during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012.

~~None.~~The aggregate fees billed by our principal accounting firm for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

TAX FEES:

	2012		2011
Audit fees*	$	14,000	$	9,000
Audit related fees		-		-
Tax fees		-		-
All other fees		-		-
Total fees	$	14,000	$	9,000

~~None~~*For the year ended May 31, 2012, we were billed $7,500 by Sherb, for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and $6,500 by De Joya for the review of financial statements included in our reports on Form 10-Q for the first, second and third quarters or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. For the year ended May 31, 2011, we were billed $9,000 by De Joya, for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

~~ALL~~AUDIT ~~OTHER~~COMMITTEE ~~FEES~~POLICIES AND PROCEDURES:

~~None~~We do not currently have a standing audit committee. The above services were approved by the Board.

~~AUDIT~~PART ~~COMMITTEE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES:~~IV

WeItem ~~do not currently have a standing audit committee~~15. ~~The~~Exhibits ~~above~~and ~~services~~Financial ~~were~~Statement ~~approved by the Board.~~Schedules

~~PART~~(a) IVThe following documents are filed as part of this Report:

~~Item~~1. 15Financial Statements. ~~Exhibits~~ The following financial statements and ~~Financial~~the ~~Statement~~report ~~Schedules~~of our independent registered public accounting firm, are filed herewith.

~~(a)~~· ~~The~~Report ~~following~~of ~~documents~~Independent ~~are~~Registered ~~filed~~Public asAccounting ~~part of this Report:~~Firm

1.· ~~Financial~~Balance ~~Statements. The~~Sheets ~~following~~at ~~financial~~May ~~statements and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm~~31, ~~are~~2012 ~~filed~~and ~~herewith.~~2011

~~· Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~16

· ~~Balance~~Statements ~~Sheets~~of atOperations for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 and ~~2010~~for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) to May 31, 2012

· ~~Statements~~Statement of ~~Operations~~Stockholders’ ~~for~~Equity ~~the years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 and~~ for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) to May 31, ~~2011~~2012

· ~~Statement~~Statements of ~~Stockholders’~~Cash ~~Equity~~Flows for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) to May 31, ~~2011~~2012

· ~~Statements~~Notes ~~of Cash Flows for the years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006)~~ to ~~May~~Financial ~~31, 2011~~Statements

·2. ~~Notes to~~ Financial ~~Statements~~Statement Schedules.

2.Schedules ~~Financial~~are ~~Statement~~omitted ~~Schedules~~because the information required is not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

~~Schedules~~3. ~~are~~Exhibits ~~omitted~~Incorporated ~~because~~by ~~the~~Reference ~~information required is not applicable~~ or ~~the~~Filed ~~required~~with ~~information~~this ~~is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto~~Report.

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of July 9, 2008(2)
3.2		By-Laws (2)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of July 30, 2009 (2)
3.4		Certificate of Correction of the Certificate of Amendment (2)
10.1		Occupancy Agreement between Mattmar and Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC (1)
31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

~~3. Exhibits Incorporated by Reference or Filed with this Report.~~____________________________

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of July 9, 2008(2)
3.2		By-Laws (2)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of July 30, 2009 (2)
3.4		Certificate of Correction of the Certificate of Amendment (2)
10.1		Occupancy Agreement between Mattmar and Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC (1)
31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

*Included herewith

*~~Included~~*Filed ~~herewith~~with this report in accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

(1)

Previously filed as an Exhibit in the company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)

Previously filed as an Exhibit in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MATTMAR MINERALS, INC
Date: August 1, 2011
Date: September 10, 2012
	By: /s/Arnold P. Kling
	By:	/s/Arnold P. Kling
	Arnold P. Kling, President

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: August 1, 2011

Date: September 10, 2012

	/s/Arnold P. Kling
	Arnold P. Kling, President and Sole Director
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: September 10, 2012

	/s/Kirk M. Warshaw	.
	Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

~~/s/Arnold P. Kling Arnold P. Kling, President and Sole Director (Principal Executive Officer)~~18

~~Date:~~MATTMAR ~~August 1~~MINERALS, ~~2011~~INC

~~/s/Kirk M. Warshaw Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer~~ (~~Principal~~A ~~Financial~~Development ~~and Accounting Officer~~Stage Company)

18INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MATTMAR MINERALS, INC

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Financial Statements:

Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 (Audited)	F-3

Statements of Operations for the Years Ended May 31, 2012 and 2011(Audited) and for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) through May 31, 2012 (Unaudited)	F-4

Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) through May 31, 2012 (Unaudited)	F-5

Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 (Audited) and for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) to May 31, 2012 (Unaudited)	F-6

Notes to Financial Statements	F-7 to F-12

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~F-1

~~INDEX~~REPORT TOOF ~~FINANCIAL~~INDEPENDENT ~~STATEMENTS~~REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2011 and 2010		F-3
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) through May 31, 2011		F-4
Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) through May 31, 2011		F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from Inception (April 18, 2006) to May 31, 2011		F-6
Notes to Financial Statements		F-7 to F-12

Stockholders and Directors

~~F-1~~Mattmar Minerals, Inc.

De(A ~~Joya~~Development ~~Griffith~~Stage & Company~~, LLC~~)

~~CERTIFIED~~Summit, ~~PUBLIC~~New ~~ACCOUNTANTS & CONSULTANTS~~Jersey

~~Report~~We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ~~Independent~~Mattmar Minerals, ~~Registered~~Inc. ~~Public~~(A ~~Accounting~~Development ~~Firm~~Stage Company) as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity ( deficit ) , and cash flows for each of the years then ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

ToWe conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of ~~Directors~~material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and ~~Stockholders~~disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mattmar Minerals, Inc. as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

WeThe ~~have~~accompanying ~~audited~~financial ~~the~~statements ~~accompanying~~have ~~balance~~been ~~sheets~~prepared ofassuming that Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (Awill ~~Development~~continue ~~Stage~~as ~~Company)~~a asgoing ofconcern. ~~May~~As ~~31,~~more ~~2011~~fully ~~and~~described ~~2010,~~in ~~and~~Note 1, the ~~related~~Company ~~statements~~has ofincurred ~~operations,~~recurring operating ~~stockholders’~~losses ~~equity,~~ and ~~cash~~will ~~flows~~have ~~for~~to ~~the~~obtain ~~years~~additional ~~then~~capital ~~ended~~to ~~and~~sustain ~~from~~operations. ~~inception~~These ~~(April~~conditions ~~18,~~raise ~~2006)~~substantial todoubt ~~May~~about the ~~31,~~Company’s ~~2011.~~ability ~~Mattmar~~to ~~Minerals,~~continue ~~Inc~~as a going concern. ~~management~~Management’s isplans ~~responsible~~in ~~for~~regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements. ~~Our~~do ~~responsibility~~not isinclude any adjustments to ~~express~~reflect anthe ~~opinion~~possible effects on ~~these~~the ~~financial~~recoverability ~~statements~~and ~~based~~classification of onassets ~~our~~or ~~audits~~the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’/s/SHERB ~~internal~~& ~~control over the financial reporting. Accordingly~~CO, weLLP ~~express~~Certified noPublic such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.Accountants

InNew ~~our opinion~~York, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of May 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and from inception (April 18, 2006) to May 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.NY

~~The~~August ~~accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements~~31, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.2012

~~De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC~~F-2

~~/s/~~MATTMAR ~~De Joya Griffith & Company~~MINERALS, ~~LLC~~INC

~~Henderson,~~(A ~~Nevada~~Development Stage Company)

~~July~~BALANCE ~~25, 2011~~SHEETS

~~F-2~~(Audited)

MATTMAR MINERALS, INC

	May 31,			May 31,
	2012			2011

ASSETS

Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,345		$	12,404
Prepaid expense		-			-

Total current assets		14,345			12,404

TOTAL ASSETS	$	14,345		$	12,404

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	1,841		$	3,332
Accounts payable - related party		833			833
Total current liabilities		2,674			4,165

TOTAL LIABILITIES		2,674			4,165

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 99,000,000 shares authorized, 1,333,334 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		1,334			1,334
Additional paid-in capital		211,666			186,666
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(201,329	)		(176,761	)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		11,671			8,239

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	14,345		$	12,404

(AThe ~~Development~~accompanying ~~Stage~~notes ~~Company)~~are an integral part of these financial statements.

~~BALANCE SHEETS~~F-3

~~(Audited)~~MATTMAR MINERALS, INC

	May 31,			May 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,404		$	11,576
Prepaid expense		-			-
Total current assets		12,404			11,576
TOTAL ASSETS	$	12,404		$	11,576
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	3,332		$	7,629
Accounts payable - related party		833			833
Total current liabilities		4,165			8,462
TOTAL LIABILITIES		4,165			8,462
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 99,000,000 shares authorized, 1,333,334 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		1,334			1,334
Additional paid-in capital		183,666			162,666
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(176,761	)		(160,886	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		8,239			3,114
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	12,404		$	11,576

(A Development Stage Company)

~~The~~STATEMENTS ~~accompanying~~OF ~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements.~~OPERATIONS

F-3

							For the period from April 18, 2006
	Year Ended						(Date of Inception)
	May 31,			May 31,			Through
	2012			2011			May 31, 2012
							(Unaudited)
Expenses
Professional fees	$	17,410		$	11,485		$	164,866
Regulatory and filing fees		5,100			2,260			19,537
Other expenses		2,058			2,130			24,720
Total operating expenses		24,568			15,875			209,123

Other income
Debt forgiveness		-			-			7,794
Total other income		-			-			7,794
Net loss	$	(24,568	)	$	(15,875	)	$	(201,329	)

Net loss per share – basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		1,333,334			1,333,334

~~MATTMAR~~The ~~MINERALS,~~accompanying ~~INC~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~F-4

~~STATEMENTS~~MATTMAR OFMINERALS, ~~OPERATIONS~~INC

(~~Audited~~A Development Stage Company)

							For the period from April 18, 2006
	Year Ended						(Date of Inception)
	May 31,			May 31,			Through
	2011			2010			May 31, 2011
Expenses
Professional fees	$	11,485		$	25,545		$	147,456
Regulatory and filing fees		2,260			3,033			14,437
Other expenses		2,130			2,172			22,662
Total operating expenses		15,875			30,750			184,555
Other income
Debt forgiveness		-			-			7,794
Total other income		-			-			7,794
Net loss	$	(15,875	)	$	(30,750	)	$	(176,761	)
Net loss per share – basic	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		1,333,334			1,333,334

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

~~The~~For ~~accompanying~~the ~~notes~~Period ~~are~~from anApril ~~integral~~18, ~~part~~2006 (Date of ~~these~~Inception) ~~financial~~through ~~statements.~~May 31, 2012

F-4

													Deficit
													Accumulated
											Additional		During the			Total
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						Paid-in		Development			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital		Stage			Equity
Balance at April 18, 2006 (Inception)		-	$	-		-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-
Common shares issued		-		-		1,000,000			1,000			9,000		-			10,000
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		(5,539	)		(5,539	)
Balance at May 31, 2006 (Unaudited)		-		-		1,000,000			1,000			9,000		(5,539	)		4,461
Common shares issued		-		-		300,000			300			29,700		-			30,000
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		(16,165	)		(16,165	)
Balance at May 31, 2007 (Unaudited)		-		-		1,300,000			1,300			38,700		(21,704	)		18,296
Common shares cancelled		-		-		(213,333	)		(213	)		213		-			-
Common shares issued		-		-		246,667			247			11,753		-			12,000
Contributed capital		-		-		-			-			72,000		-			72,000
Net Loss		-		-		-			-			-		(67,871	)		(67,871	)
Balance at May 31, 2008 (Unaudited)		-		-		1,333,334			1,334			122,666		(89,575	)		34,425
Contributed capital		-		-		-			-			8,000		-			8,000
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		(40,561	)		(40,561	)
Balance at May 31, 2009 (Unaudited)		-		-		1,333,334			1,334			130,666		(130,136	)		1,864
Contributed capital		-		-		-			-			32,000		-			32,000
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		(30,750	)		(30,750	)
Balance at May 31, 2010 (Unaudited)		-		-		1,333,334			1,334			162,666		(160,886	)		3,114
Contributed capital		-		-		-			-			21,000		-			21,000
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		(15,875	)		(15,875	)
Balance at May 31, 2011		-		-		1,333,334			1,334			183,666		(176,761	)		8,239
Contributed capital		-		-		-			-			28,000		-			28,000
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		(24,568	)		(24,568	)
Balance at May 31, 2012		-	$	-		1,333,334		$	1,334		$	211,666	$	(201,329	)	$	11,671

~~MATTMAR~~The ~~MINERALS,~~accompanying ~~INC~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~F-5

~~STATEMENT~~MATTMAR OFMINERALS, ~~STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY~~INC

~~For the Period from April 18, 2006~~ (~~Date~~A ofDevelopment ~~Inception)~~Stage ~~through May 31, 2011~~Company)

~~(Audited)~~STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

															Deficit
							For the period from April 18, 2006
															Accumulated
	Year Ended						(Date of Inception)
													Additional		During the			Total
	May 31,			May 31,			To
	Preferred Stock						Common Stock						Paid-in		Development			Stockholders’
	2012			2011			May 31, 2012
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Capital		Stage			Equity
							(Unaudited)
Balance at April 18, 2006 (Inception)		-		$	-			-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Common shares issued		-			-			1,000,000			1,000			9,000		-			10,000
Net loss	$	(24,568	)	$	(15,875	)	$	(201,329	)
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-		(5,539	)		(5,539	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Balance at May 31, 2006		-			-			1,000,000			1,000			9,000		(5,539	)		4,461
Debt forgiveness		-			-			(7,794	)
Common shares issued		-			-			300,000			300			29,700		-			30,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-		(16,165	)		(16,165	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		(1,491	)		(4,297	)		9,635
Balance at May 31, 2007		-			-			1,300,000			1,300			38,700		(21,704	)		18,296
Increase in accounts payable – related party		-			-			833
Common shares cancelled		-			-			(213,333	)		(213	)		213		-			-
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(26,059	)		(20,172	)		(198,655	)
Common shares issued		-			-			246,667			247			11,753		-			12,000
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Contributed capital		-			-			-			-			72,000		-			72,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock		-			-			52,000
Net Loss		-			-			-			-			-		(67,871	)		(67,871	)
Contributed capital		28,000			21,000			161,000
Balance at May 31, 2008		-			-			1,333,334			1,334			122,666		(89,575	)		34,425
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		28,000			21,000			213,000
Contributed capital		-			-			-			-			8,000		-			8,000
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		1,941			828			14,345
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-		(40,561	)		(40,561	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		12,404			11,576			-
Balance at May 31, 2009		-			-			1,333,334			1,334			130,666		(130,136	)		1,864
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	14,345		$	12,404		$	14,345
Contributed capital		-			-			-			-			32,000		-			32,000
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-		(30,750	)		(30,750	)
INFORMATION
Balance at May 31, 2010		-			-			1,333,334			1,334			162,666		(160,886	)		3,114
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Contributed capital		-			-			-			-			21,000		-			21,000
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-		(15,875	)		(15,875	)
Balance at May 31, 2011		-		$	-			1,333,334		$	1,334		$	183,666	$	(176,761	)	$	8,239

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-56

MATTMAR MINERALS, INC

(A Development Stage Company)

~~STATEMENTS~~NOTES OFTO ~~CASH~~FINANCIAL ~~FLOWS~~STATEMENTS

~~(Audited)~~Years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011

							For the period from April 18, 2006
	Year Ended						(Date of Inception)
	May 31,			May 31,			To
	2011			2010			May 31, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(15,875	)	$	(30,750	)	$	(176,761	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Debt forgiveness		-			-			(7,794	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in prepaids		-			167			-
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		(4,297	)		(25	)		11,126
Increase in accounts payable – related party		-			833			833
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(20,172	)		(29,775	)		(172,596	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of common stock		-			-			52,000
Contributed capital		21,000			32,000			133,000
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		21,000			32,000			185,000
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		828			2,225			12,404
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		11,576			9,351			-
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	12,404		$	11,576		$	12,404
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY

~~The~~THE ~~accompanying~~COMPANY’S ~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements.~~HISTORY

~~F-6~~Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “us,” “Mattmar” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on April 18, 2006. We were an exploration stage company that owned certain mineral rights in Canada. The rights were deemed to have limited value during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008. In May 2008, there was a change in control, as detailed below and we ceased our exploration activities and became a development stage company. Accordingly, our financial statements reflect our results in accordance with the disclosure requirements for a development stage company.

~~MATTMAR~~On ~~MINERALS~~September 19, ~~INC~~2008 (the “Reincorporation Date”), we reincorporated in the state of Delaware by merger with and into Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (“Mattmar Delaware”), a corporation we organized under the laws of the state of Delaware (the “Delaware Merger”). On the Reincorporation Date, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes and the Delaware General Corporate Laws, Mattmar was merged with and into Mattmar Delaware which became the surviving corporation and the officers, directors and shareholders of Mattmar became the officers, directors and stockholders of Mattmar Delaware without any change to their officership and/or directorship position(s), or beneficial ownership percentage, as may be applicable.

(AOn ~~Development~~the ~~Stage~~Reincorporation ~~Company)~~Date, we adopted the capital structure of Mattmar Delaware consisting of 100,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 99,000,000 shares are common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share and 1,000,000 shares are preferred stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. All issued and outstanding shares of common stock were automatically converted into the same number of shares of Mattmar Delaware common stock.

~~NOTES~~On TOJuly ~~FINANCIAL~~30, ~~STATEMENTS~~2009, the Company put into effect a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), on the basis of one (1) new share of Common Stock for each 10 shares of Common Stock outstanding. All references in these financial statements and notes to financial statements to number of shares, price per share and weighted average number of shares outstanding of Common Stock prior to this reverse stock split have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive basis unless otherwise noted.

~~Years~~CHANGE ~~ended~~OF ~~May~~OWNERSHIP ~~31, 2011 and 2010~~TRANSACTIONS

~~NOTE~~On 1May -9, ~~DESCRIPTION~~2008 OF(the ~~COMPANY~~“Effective Date”), the Company entered into two Securities Purchase Agreements. The first agreement (the "Company Agreement") was with Moyo Partners, LLC ("Moyo") and Kirk M. Warshaw ("Warshaw") as purchasers (each a "Purchaser" and collectively the "Purchasers"). The second agreement (the "Selling Stockholder Agreement") was by and among the Company, Sean Mitchell and R&R Biotech Partners, LLC ("R&R"). The two agreements are referred to collectively in this report as the "Agreements".

~~THE~~The ~~COMPANY’S~~closing ~~HISTORY~~of the transactions set forth in the Agreements was completed on May 12, 2008. Pursuant to the Company Agreement, Moyo and Warshaw purchased an aggregate of 246,667 shares of Common Stock for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $12,000.

OnMATTMAR ~~September 19~~MINERALS, 2008 (the “Reincorporation Date”), we reincorporated in the state of Delaware by merger with and into Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (“Mattmar Delaware”), a corporation we organized under the laws of the state of Delaware (the “Delaware Merger”). On the Reincorporation Date, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes and the Delaware General Corporate Laws, Mattmar was merged with and into Mattmar Delaware which became the surviving corporation and the officers, directors and shareholders of Mattmar became the officers, directors and stockholders of Mattmar Delaware without any change to their officership and/or directorship position(s), or beneficial ownership percentage, as may be applicable.INC

On(A ~~the~~Development ~~Reincorporation~~Stage Date, we adopted the capital structure of Mattmar Delaware consisting of 100,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 99,000,000 shares are common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share and 1,000,000 shares are preferred stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. All issued and outstanding shares of common stock were automatically converted into the same number of shares of Mattmar Delaware common stock.Company)

OnNOTES ~~July~~TO ~~30,~~FINANCIAL 2009, the Company put into effect a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), on the basis of one (1) new share of Common Stock for each 10 shares of Common Stock outstanding. All references in these financial statements and notes to financial statements to number of shares, price per share and weighted average number of shares outstanding of Common Stock prior to this reverse stock split have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive basis unless otherwise noted.STATEMENTS

~~CHANGE~~Years OFended ~~OWNERSHIP~~May ~~TRANSACTIONS~~31, 2012 and 2011

OnNOTE ~~May~~1 9,- ~~2008~~DESCRIPTION ~~(the~~OF ~~“Effective~~COMPANY ~~Date”), the Company entered into two Securities Purchase Agreements. The first agreement~~ (~~the "Company Agreement"~~continued) was with Moyo Partners, LLC ("Moyo") and Kirk M. Warshaw ("Warshaw") as purchasers (each a "Purchaser" and collectively the "Purchasers"). The second agreement (the "Selling Stockholder Agreement") was by and among the Company, Sean Mitchell and R&R Biotech Partners, LLC ("R&R"). The two agreements are referred to collectively in this report as the "Agreements".:

~~The~~Pursuant ~~closing~~to of the ~~transactions~~Selling ~~set~~Stockholder ~~forth~~Agreement, Sean inMitchell, who immediately before the ~~Agreements~~closing was ~~completed~~our onsole ~~May~~director, 12President, ~~2008.~~Chief ~~Pursuant~~Financial toOfficer, Secretary and Treasurer and the ~~Company~~owner ~~Agreement,~~of ~~Moyo~~approximately 77% of our issued and ~~Warshaw~~outstanding ~~purchased~~Common anStock, ~~aggregate~~sold ofto ~~246~~R&R Biotech Partners,~~667~~ LLC, 786,667 shares of Common Stock for ~~aggregate~~a ~~gross~~price ~~proceeds~~of $138,000 and returned to the Company offor ~~$12~~cancellation his remaining 213,~~000~~333 shares of Common Stock.

F-Concurrently with the Agreements, Sean Mitchell, former shareholder and sole officer of the Company, forgave accounts payable due him in the amount of $7,794. Because Mr. Mitchell was no longer a stockholder or officer of the Company at the time of the debt forgiveness, the Company accounted for the debt forgiveness as a gain for the year ended May 31, 2008.

~~MATTMAR~~Also ~~MINERALS~~pursuant to the terms of the Agreements, on ~~INC~~the Effective Date, Mr. Mitchell (i) elected Arnold P. Kling as the sole director of the Company and (ii) resigned as sole director and from all his positions with the Company. At the same time, Arnold P. Kling was appointed as President and Secretary of the Company, and Kirk Warshaw was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In September 2008, Mr. Warshaw replaced Mr. Kling as our Secretary.

(APrior ~~Development~~to ~~Stage~~the Closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreements, R&R, Moyo, nor Warshaw were affiliated with the Company). However, one or more of them may now be deemed affiliates of the Company as a result of stock ownership interests and director or officer elections made pursuant to the Agreements.

~~NOTES~~As TOof ~~FINANCIAL~~May ~~STATEMENTS~~31, 2012, we had issued and outstanding 1,333,334 shares of Common Stock and no shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share (“Preferred Stock”). All issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

~~Years~~THE ~~ended~~COMPANY ~~May 31, 2011 and 2010~~TODAY

~~NOTE~~The 1Company -is ~~DESCRIPTION~~currently OFa ~~COMPANY~~development stage ~~(continued):~~company reporting under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard Accounting Standards Codification FASB ASC 915-205 "Development-Stage Entities".

~~Pursuant~~Since toMay ~~the Selling Stockholder Agreement~~9, ~~Sean Mitchell~~2008, ~~who~~our ~~immediately~~purpose ~~before~~has ~~the~~been to ~~closing~~serve ~~was~~as ~~our~~a ~~sole~~vehicle ~~director,~~to ~~President,~~acquire ~~Chief~~an ~~Financial~~operating ~~Officer,~~business ~~Secretary~~ and ~~Treasurer~~we ~~and~~are ~~the~~currently ~~owner~~considered ofa ~~approximately~~“shell” ~~77%~~company ofinasmuch as ~~our~~we ~~issued~~are ~~and~~not ~~outstanding~~generating ~~Common Stock~~revenues, ~~sold~~do tonot ~~R&R~~own ~~Biotech~~an ~~Partners,~~operating ~~LLC~~business, ~~786,667~~and ~~shares~~have ofno ~~Common~~specific ~~Stock~~plan ~~for~~other than to engage in a ~~price~~merger or ofacquisition ~~$138,000~~transaction ~~and~~with ~~returned~~a yet-to-be ~~the~~identified ~~Company~~operating ~~for~~company ~~cancellation~~or ~~his~~business. ~~remaining~~We ~~213,333~~have ~~shares~~no ofemployees ~~Common~~and ~~Stock.~~no material assets

~~Concurrently~~GOING with the Agreements, Sean Mitchell, former shareholder and sole officer of the Company, forgave accounts payable due him in the amount of $7,794. Because Mr. Mitchell was no longer a stockholder or officer of the Company at the time of the debt forgiveness, the Company accounted for the debt forgiveness as a gain for the year ended May 31, 2008.CONCERN

~~Also~~The ~~pursuant~~accompanying tofinancial statements have been prepared for the ~~terms~~Company ofas a going concern. As shown in the ~~Agreements,~~accompanying onfinancial statements, the ~~Effective~~Company ~~Date~~has accumulated losses of $201,329 ~~Mr.~~and ~~Mitchell~~has no sales from inception (i)April ~~elected~~18, ~~Arnold~~2006) P.to ~~Kling~~May as31, ~~the~~2012. ~~sole~~The ~~director~~future of the Company ~~and~~is ~~(ii)~~dependent ~~resigned~~upon its asability ~~sole~~to ~~director~~find a merger partner, obtain financing and ~~from~~upon ~~all~~future ~~his~~profitable ~~positions~~operations. ~~with~~Management expects to incur additional losses in the ~~Company.~~foreseeable Atfuture and recognizes the ~~same~~need ~~time,~~to ~~Arnold~~raise Pcapital to remain viable. ~~Kling~~These ~~was~~conditions ~~appointed~~raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as ~~President~~a ~~and~~going ~~Secretary~~concern. ofThe financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the ~~Company,~~recoverability and ~~Kirk~~classification ~~Warshaw~~of ~~was~~recorded ~~appointed~~assets, asor ~~Chief~~the ~~Financial~~amounts ~~Officer~~of and classification of ~~the~~liabilities ~~Company. In~~that ~~September~~might ~~2008,~~be necessary ~~Mr.~~in ~~Warshaw~~the ~~replaced~~event ~~Mr.~~the ~~Kling~~Company ascannot ~~our~~continue ~~Secretary~~in existence.

Prior to the Closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreements, R&R, Moyo, nor Warshaw were affiliated with the Company. However, one or more of them may now be deemed affiliates of the Company as a result of stock ownership interests and director or officer elections made pursuant to the Agreements.F-8

AsMATTMAR ~~of May 31~~MINERALS, 2011, we had issued and outstanding 1,333,334 shares of Common Stock and no shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share (“Preferred Stock”). All issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.INC

~~THE~~(A ~~COMPANY~~Development ~~TODAY~~Stage Company)

~~The~~NOTES ~~Company~~TO isFINANCIAL ~~currently a development stage company reporting under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard Accounting Standards Codification FASB ASC 915-205 "Development-Stage Entities".~~STATEMENTS

~~Since~~Years ended May 931, ~~2008,~~2012 ~~our purpose has been to serve as a vehicle to acquire an operating business~~ and we are currently considered a “shell” company inasmuch as we are not generating revenues, do not own an operating business, and have no specific plan other than to engage in a merger or acquisition transaction with a yet-to-be identified operating company or business. We have no employees and no material assets2011

~~GOING~~NOTE ~~CONCERN~~2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

~~The~~Mattmar's ~~accompanying~~accounting ~~financial~~policies ~~statements~~are ~~have~~in ~~been~~accordance with ~~prepared~~accounting ~~for~~principles ~~the~~generally ~~Company~~accepted ~~as a going concern. As shown~~ in the ~~accompanying~~United ~~financial~~States ~~statements, the Company has accumulated losses~~ of ~~$176,761 and has no sales from inception (April 18, 2006) to May 31, 2011~~America. ~~The~~Outlined ~~future~~below ofare ~~the~~those ~~Company~~policies isconsidered ~~dependent upon its ability to find a merger partner, obtain financing and upon future profitable operations~~particularly significant. Management expects to incur additional losses in the foreseeable future and recognizes the need to raise capital to remain viable. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

FUse of Estimates -8 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~MATTMAR~~Fair ~~MINERALS,~~Value ~~INC~~of Financial Instruments – In accordance with accounting guidance we are required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on our balance sheet. We consider the carrying value of accrued expenses in the financial statements to approximate their fair value because of their short term nature.

(AStatements ~~Development~~of ~~Stage~~Cash ~~Company)~~Flows - For purposes of the statements of cash flows we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

~~NOTES~~Income TOTaxes ~~FINANCIAL~~- ~~STATEMENTS~~The asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not, that such assets will be realized.

~~Years~~Equity ~~ended~~Based ~~May~~Compensation ~~31,~~– ~~2011~~The accounting guidance for share based payments requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and ~~2010~~similar awards and applies to all outstanding and vested stock-based awards.

~~NOTE~~Net 2Loss per Share - ~~SUMMARY~~Net OFloss ~~SIGNIFICANT~~per ~~ACCOUNTING~~share is ~~POLICIES:~~calculated in accordance with the guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board for "Earnings Per Share". The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic loss per share. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted averaged number of shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of employee stock options, warrants, and restricted stock, and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation in periods where the Company has incurred a net loss.

~~Mattmar's accounting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Outlined below are those policies considered particularly significant.~~F-9

~~Use~~MATTMAR ofMINERALS, Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.INC

~~Fair~~(A ~~Value~~Development ofStage Financial Instruments – In accordance with accounting guidance we are required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on our balance sheet. We consider the carrying value of accrued expenses in the financial statements to approximate their fair value because of their short term nature.Company)

~~Statements~~NOTES ofTO ~~Cash~~FINANCIAL ~~Flows - For purposes of the statements of cash flows we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.~~STATEMENTS

~~Income~~Years ~~Taxes~~ended -May ~~The asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method~~31, ~~deferred~~2012 ~~tax assets~~ and liabilities are recognized for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not, that such assets will be realized.2011

~~Equity~~NOTE ~~Based~~2 ~~Compensation~~- –SUMMARY ~~The~~OF ~~accounting~~SIGNIFICANT ~~guidance~~ACCOUNTING ~~for~~POLICIES ~~share based payments requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and similar awards and applies to all outstanding and vested stock-based awards.~~(Continued):

~~Net~~New ~~Loss per Share - Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with the guidance issued by the Financial~~ Accounting Standards Board for "Earnings Per Share". The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic loss per share. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted averaged number of shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of employee stock options, warrants, and restricted stock, and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation in periods where the Company has incurred a net loss.Pronouncements

~~F-9~~All new accounting pronouncements issued but not yet effective have been reviewed and determined to be not applicable. As a result, the adoption of such new accounting pronouncements, when effective, is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position of the Company.

~~MATTMAR~~NOTE ~~MINERALS,~~3 ~~INC~~- STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(AOn ~~Development~~July ~~Stage~~30, 2009, the Company put into effect a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its Common Stock on the basis of one (1) new share of Common Stock for each 10 shares of Common Stock outstanding. All references in these financial statements and notes to financial statements to number of shares, price per share and weighted average number of shares outstanding of Common Stock prior to this reverse stock split have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive basis unless otherwise noted.

~~NOTES~~On TOApril ~~FINANCIAL~~20, ~~STATEMENTS~~2006, a total of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to the founding and sole director of the Company pursuant to a stock subscription agreement at $0.01 per share for total proceeds of $10,000.

~~Years~~Effective ~~ended~~September ~~May~~18, 312006, ~~2011~~a ~~and~~total of ~~2010~~300,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to 22 shareholders pursuant to stock subscription agreements at $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $30,000.

~~NOTE~~On 2May -9, ~~SUMMARY~~2008, OFwe ~~SIGNIFICANT~~entered ~~ACCOUNTING~~into ~~POLICIES~~two ~~(Continued):~~Securities Purchase Agreements. The closing of the transactions set forth in the Agreements was completed on May 12, 2008. Pursuant to the Company Agreement, Moyo and Warshaw purchased an aggregate of 246,667 shares of Common Stock for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $12,000.

~~New~~Pursuant ~~Accounting~~to ~~Pronouncements~~the Selling Stockholder Agreement, Sean Mitchell, who immediately before the closing was our sole director, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and the owner of approximately 77% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, sold to R&R 786,667 shares of Common Stock for a price of $138,000 and returned to the Company for cancellation his remaining 213,333 shares of Common Stock.

~~All~~During ~~new~~the ~~accounting~~year ~~pronouncements~~ended ~~issued~~May ~~but~~31, ~~not~~2012 ~~yet~~and ~~effective~~the ~~have~~year ~~been~~ended ~~reviewed~~May ~~and~~31, 2011, ~~determined~~R&R tocontributed be$28,000 ~~not~~and ~~applicable. As~~$21,000, ~~a result~~respectively, to the ~~adoption~~Company ofas ~~such~~Additional ~~new~~Paid ~~accounting~~in ~~pronouncements,~~Capital. ~~when~~R&R ~~effective,~~ is ~~not~~a ~~expected~~majority stockholder toof ~~have~~the aCompany ~~material~~and ~~impact~~as onsuch, ~~the~~is ~~financial~~able ~~position~~to ofexercise ~~the~~control ~~Company~~over matters requiring stockholder approval.

~~NOTE~~As 3of -May ~~STOCKHOLDERS’~~31, ~~EQUITY~~2012, as a result of the Delaware Merger, our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of which 99,000,000 shares are Common Stock per share and 1,000,000 shares are Preferred Stock. 1,333,334 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding, all of which are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

~~On July 30, 2009, the Company put into effect a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of its Common Stock on the basis of one (1) new share of Common Stock for each~~ F-10 shares of Common Stock outstanding. All references in these financial statements and notes to financial statements to number of shares, price per share and weighted average number of shares outstanding of Common Stock prior to this reverse stock split have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive basis unless otherwise noted.

OnMATTMAR ~~April 20~~MINERALS, 2006, a total of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to the founding and sole director of the Company pursuant to a stock subscription agreement at $0.01 per share for total proceeds of $10,000.INC

~~Effective~~(A ~~September~~Development ~~18,~~Stage ~~2006, a total of 300,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to 22 shareholders pursuant to stock subscription agreements at $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $30,000.~~Company)

OnNOTES ~~May~~TO 9,FINANCIAL 2008, we entered into two Securities Purchase Agreements. The closing of the transactions set forth in the Agreements was completed on May 12, 2008. Pursuant to the Company Agreement, Moyo and Warshaw purchased an aggregate of 246,667 shares of Common Stock for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $12,000.STATEMENTS

~~Pursuant~~Years toended ~~the~~May ~~Selling Stockholder Agreement~~31, ~~Sean~~2012 ~~Mitchell, who immediately before the closing was our sole director, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary~~ and Treasurer and the owner of approximately 77% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, sold to R&R 786,667 shares of Common Stock for a price of $138,000 and returned to the Company for cancellation his remaining 213,333 shares of Common Stock.2011

~~During~~NOTE ~~the~~4 ~~year~~– ~~ended~~INCOME May 31, 2011 and the year ended May 31, 2010, R&R contributed $21,000 and $32,000, respectively, to the Company as Additional Paid in Capital. R&R is a majority stockholder of the Company and as such, is able to exercise control over matters requiring stockholder approval.TAXES

AsThe ofCompany ~~May~~accounts ~~31,~~for ~~2011,~~income astaxes using ~~a result of~~ the ~~Delaware~~liability ~~Merger~~method, ~~our~~under ~~authorized~~which ~~capital~~deferred ~~stock~~tax ~~consists~~liabilities ofand ~~100,000,000~~assets ~~shares~~are ofdetermined ~~which~~based ~~99,000,000~~on ~~shares~~the ~~are~~difference ~~Common~~between ~~Stock~~the financial ~~per~~statement ~~share~~carrying amounts and ~~1,000,000~~the ~~shares~~tax ~~are~~basis ~~Preferred~~of ~~Stock. 1,333,334~~assets ~~shares~~and ofliabilities ~~Common~~using ~~Stock~~enacted ~~were~~tax ~~issued~~rates ~~and~~in ~~outstanding,~~effect ~~all~~in ofthe years in which ~~are~~the ~~validly~~differences ~~issued,~~are ~~fully~~expected ~~paid~~to ~~and non-assessable~~reverse.

FAs of May 31, 2012, the Company had net operating loss carry-10forwards of approximately $201,000 which expire in varying amounts between 2026 and 2031. Realization of this potential future tax benefit is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the loss carry-forward. The deferred tax asset related to this potential future tax benefit has been offset by a valuation allowance in the same amount. The amount of the deferred tax asset ultimately realizable could be increased in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carry-forward period are revised.

~~MATTMAR~~Deferred ~~MINERALS~~income tax assets of $82,000 ~~INC~~and $72,000 at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively were offset in full by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was increased by $10,000 in the year ended May 31, 2012.

(AThe ~~Development~~components ~~Stage~~of the Company)’s net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows:

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	As of May 31, 2012			As of May 31, 2011
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry-forwards	$	201,000		$	177,000

Total deferred tax assets		82,000			72,000

Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance		82,000			72,000
Less: Valuation allowance		(82,000	)		(72,000	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

~~Years~~A ~~ended~~reconciliation ~~May~~between ~~31,~~the ~~2011~~amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and ~~2010~~State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:

NOTE 4 – INCOME TAXES

	As of May 31, 2012			As of May 31, 2011
Statutory federal income tax		(35.0	)%		(35.0	)%
Statutory state income tax		(5.9	)%		(5.9	)%

Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		40.9	%		40.9	%

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method, under which deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.F-11

AsMATTMAR ~~of May 31~~MINERALS, 2011, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $177,000 which expire in varying amounts between 2026 and 2031. Realization of this potential future tax benefit is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the loss carry-forward. The deferred tax asset related to this potential future tax benefit has been offset by a valuation allowance in the same amount. The amount of the deferred tax asset ultimately realizable could be increased in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carry-forward period are revised.INC

~~Deferred~~(A ~~income~~Development ~~tax~~Stage ~~assets of $77,349 and $70,357 at May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively were offset in full by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was increased by $6,992 in the year ended May 31, 2011.~~Company)

~~The~~NOTES ~~components~~TO ofFINANCIAL ~~the Company’s net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows:~~ STATEMENTS

	As of May 31,			As of May 31,
	2011			2010
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry-forwards	$	177,000		$	161,000
Total deferred tax assets		77,349			70,357
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance		77,349			70,357
Less: Valuation allowance		(77,349	)		(70,357	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

Years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011

ANOTE ~~reconciliation~~5 ~~between~~– ~~the~~COMMITMENTS ~~amounts~~AND ~~of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:~~CONTINGENCIES

	As of May 31,			As of May 31,
	2011			2010
Statutory federal income tax		(35.0	)%		(35.0	)%
Statutory state income tax		(8.7	)%		(8.7	)%
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		43.7	%		43.7	%

On January 29, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC (the “LLC”) for the use and occupancy, and administrative services, related to its principal offices. The agreement provides for quarterly payments from the Company to the LLC of $500. The effective date of the agreement is January 1, 2009.

~~F-11~~NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

~~MATTMAR~~The ~~MINERALS~~Company pays the LLC rent payments of $500 per quarter. Kirk Warshaw, ~~INC~~our chief financial officer, is a managing member of the LLC. For the year ended May 31, 2012, the Company has paid the LLC $1,167 in rent expense and as of May 31, 2012, has a related party account payable amount of $833.

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~F-12

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company pays the LLC rent payments of $500 per quarter. Kirk Warshaw, our chief financial officer, is a managing member of the LLC. For the year ended May 31, 2011, the Company has paid the LLC $1,167 in rent expense and as of May 31, 2011, has a related party account payable amount of $833.

During the year ended May 31, 2011 and the year ended May 31, 2010, R&R contributed $21,000 and $32,000, respectively, to the Company as Additional Paid in Capital. R&R is a majority stockholder of the Company and as such, is able to exercise control over matters requiring stockholder approval.

F-12

Filing Compare · MATTMAR MINERALS INC