~~UNITED~~ U.S. ~~STATES~~Securities and Exchange Commission

~~SECURITIES~~Washington, D.C. ~~AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~20549

~~Washington, DC 20549~~____________________

FORM 10-Q

____________________

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report ~~pursuant~~Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of ~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~

~~For~~ the Securities ~~quarterly~~Exchange ~~period~~Act ~~ended~~of ~~November 30, 2011~~1934

~~¨ Transition~~For ~~Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of~~ the ~~Securities~~quarterly ~~Exchange~~period ~~Act~~ended ofMay ~~1934~~31, 2012

~~For~~Transition Report ~~the~~Pursuant ~~transition period~~ to Section 13 or 15(d)

~~Commission~~of the ~~File~~Securities ~~Number~~Exchange ~~0-29901~~Act

For the transition period from N/A to N/A

____________________

Commission File No. 0-29901

____________________

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

(~~Exact~~Name ~~name~~ of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Delaware	98-4802535	~~98-4802535~~
(State or other jurisdiction of		(IRS Employer
State of Incorporation	IRS Employer Identification No.
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

4000 Bridgeway, Ste. #~~400~~401, Sausalito, CA 94965

Sausalito, CA 94965

(Address of principal executive offices)

(415) ~~331~~524-~~7700~~5967

(Issuer’s telephone number~~, including area code~~)

~~(Former~~Securities ~~address~~registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

~~2330 Marinship Way, Ste. #300~~None

~~Sausalito,~~Securities CAregistered ~~94965~~under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

~~Check~~Common whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports)Stock, ~~and~~$0.0001 ~~(2)~~par ~~has~~value ~~been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days YES x NO ¨~~per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (~~§232.405~~Title of ~~this chapter~~Class) ~~during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ¨ NO x~~

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~registrant~~Registrant is(1) has afiled ~~shell~~all ~~company~~reports ~~(as~~required ~~defined~~by inSection 13 ~~Rule~~or ~~12b-2~~15(d) of the ~~Exchange~~Securities Exchange Act. of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports)~~: YES~~ and ~~¨ NO~~(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨

OnIndicate by ~~January~~check 4,mark ~~2012,~~whether the registrant ~~had~~has ~~outstanding~~submitted 38electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,~~315~~ if any,~~615~~ ~~shares~~every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of ~~Common~~Regulation ~~Stock,~~S-T ~~which~~(§232.405 isof this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant’s ~~only~~was ~~class~~required ofto ~~common~~submit ~~equity~~and post such files). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-–accelerated filer~~, or a smaller reporting Company~~. See ~~definitions~~definition of “~~large~~ accelerated filer,” large “accelerated filer” and “~~smaller~~Smaller reporting ~~Company~~company” in Rule 12b-–2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non ~~accelerated~~ –Accelerated filer ¨ ~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~ Smaller reporting company x

~~Transitional~~Indicate by ~~Small~~check ~~Business~~mark ~~Disclosure~~whether ~~Format~~the registrant is a shell company (~~Check~~as ~~one): YES~~defined ~~¨ NO~~in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at July 9, 2012
Common stock, $0.0001 par value		63,315,615

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

~~Form~~INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FILING

~~For~~FOR THE ~~the~~THREE ~~Three~~MONTHS ~~and~~ENDED ~~Nine~~MAY ~~Months~~31, ~~Ended~~2012

November 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
		Page Numbers
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		3
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and February 28, 2011		3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended November 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three and Nine Months ended November 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
Item 2.	Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	16
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		16
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	16
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		17
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		17
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	17
Item 1A. Risk Factors		17
Item 1A	Risk Factors	17
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		17
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	20
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		18
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	20
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)		18
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	20
Item 5. Other Information		18
Item 5.	Other information	20
Item 6. Exhibits		18
Item 6.	Exhibits	20
Signatures		18
CERTIFICATIONS
Exhibit 31 – Management certification
Exhibit 32 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act

2PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~PART~~Item I1. Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

~~Condensed~~CONDENSED ~~Consolidated~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Balance~~BALANCE ~~Sheets~~SHEET

	November 30,			February 28,
	May 31,			February 29,
	2011			2011
	2012			2012
	(Unaudited)
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	~~25,233~~—		$	~~385,888~~—
Accounts receivable, net		—			6,561
Prepaid expenses and other assets		2,000			2,000
Inventory		—			61,564
Total current assets		2,000			2,000
Prepaid expenses and other assets		2,000			346,728
Total assets	$	2,000		$	2,000
Total current assets		27,233			800,741
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Deposits on kiosks		—			394,206
Other assets		—			11,485
Total assets	$	27,233		$	1,206,432
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accrued liabilities-post petition	$	1823,~~480~~852		$	—19,002
Convertible note-post petition		2550,000			—50,000
Total liabilities not subject to compromise		4373,~~480~~852			—69,002
Liabilities subject to compromise		1,032,254			1,~~167~~032,~~837~~254
Total liabilities		1,~~075~~106,~~734~~106			1,~~167~~101,~~837~~256
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Stockholders’ deficit
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized 38,315,615 and 30,208,459 issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2011 and February 28, 2011, respectively		3,832			3,021
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized 63,315,615 issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2012 and February 29, 2012		6,332			6,332
Additional paid-in capital		18,~~295~~376,~~520~~863			1218,~~901~~376,~~495~~863
Subscriptions receivable		—			(30,000	)
Accumulated deficit		(19,487,301	)		(19,482,451	)
Accumulated deficit		(19,347,853	)		(12,835,921	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,104,106	)		(1,099,256	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(1,048,501	)		38,595
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	2,000		$	2,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	27,233		$	1,206,432

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements.

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

~~Condensed~~CONDENSED ~~Consolidated~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Statements~~STATEMENT ~~of Operations (Unaudited)~~OF OPERATIONS

	Three months ended November 30,						Nine months ended November 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Revenue	$	—		$	239		$	39,117		$	578
Expenses
Direct operating expenses		—			—			169,605			—
General and administrative expenses		37,042			3,195,491			4,359,821			4,955,264
Total expenses		37,042			3,195,491			4,529,426			4,955,264
Loss from operations		(37,042	)		(3,195,252	)		(4,490,309	)		(4,954,686	)
Other expenses:
Interest		27,436			16,207			52,487			260,726
Loss on conversion of debt to equity		—			—			1,478,693			46,550
Loss on sale of assets		71,370			20,354			71,370			20,354
Depreciation		—			1,384			48,996			15,957
Equipment impairment		—			—			370,077			—
Total other expenses		98,806			37,945			2,021,623			343,587
Loss before income taxes		(135,848	)		(3,233,197	)		(6,511,932	)		(5,298,273	)
Provision for income taxes		—			—			—			—
Net loss	$	(135,848	)	$	(3,233,197	)	$	(6,511,932	)	$	(5,298,273	)
Net loss per common share – basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.33	)
Weighted average number of shares – basic and diluted		38,315,615			20,576,892			35,794,596			16,029,953

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2012			2011
Revenue	$	—		$	20,236
Cost of revenue		—			63,713
Gross loss		—			(43,477	)
Operating expenses		1,400			2,837,145
Loss from operations		1,400			(2,880,622	)

Interest expense		—			15,091

Loss before reorganization items and income taxes		1,400			(2,895,713	)
Reorganization items		3,450			—
Loss before income taxes		(4,850	)		(2,895,713	)
Provision for income taxes		—			—
Net loss	$	(4,850	)	$	(2,895,713	)

Net loss per common share – basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.09	)

Weighted average number of shares – basic and diluted		63,315,615			32,223,740

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC. (Debtor-in-Possession)

~~(Debtor-in-Possession)~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows~~ (Unaudited)

	Nine months ended			Nine months ended
	Three Months Ended May 31,
	November 30, 2011			November 30, 2010
	2012			2011
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(64,~~511,932~~850	)	$	(52,~~298~~895,~~273~~713	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		~~48,996~~—			519,~~422~~598
Amortization		~~110,551~~—			—43,926
Impairment of equipment		370,077			—
Interest expense accrued but unpaid on convertible of debt		—			15,091
Interest expense accrued but unpaid on convertible of debt		27,488			166,079
Share based compensation		—			2,369,664
Share based compensation		3,529,191			4,385,652
Warrants issued for services		—			11,086
Warrants issued for services		11,086			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:		—
Loss on conversion of debt to equity		1,478,693			46,550
Accounts receivable		—			(2,001	)
Bad debt expense		7,794			—
Prepaid expenses and other assets		—			(13,982	)
Shares issued to settle dispute		—			132,509
Inventory		—			(76,738	)
Debt discount		25,000			—
Accrued liabilities-post petition		4,850			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and accrued interest		—			235,635
Accounts receivable		(1,233	)		—
Net cash used in operating activities		—			(293,434	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		35,111			(1,316,809	)
Inventory		(84,460	)		—
Other assets		10,125			(9,448	)
Payables and accrued liabilities-post petition		18,480			—
Deposit on Kiosk		—			(10,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and accrued interest		228,502			290,140
Net cash used in operating activities		(696,531	)		(1,608,178	)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of equipment		—			20,355
Purchase of equipment		—			(199,741	)
Purchase of equipment		(139,034	)		(49,482	)
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(199,741	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(139,034	)		(29,127	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock for cash		~~216,000~~—			179,~~438,394~~000
Subscriptions receivable		~~30,000~~—			—30,000
Due to stockholders		~~166,000~~—			7813,~~636~~000
Payments on note payable		~~(27,090~~—	)		—(12,090	)
Convertible note-post petition		25,000			—
Net cash provided by financing activities		—			109,910
Notes payable-Short term		65,000			32,697
Net decrease in cash		—			(383,265	)
Proceeds from notes payable to stockholders		—			145,481
Cash – beginning of period		—			385,888
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		474,910			1,695,208
Cash – end of period	$	—		$	2,623
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(360,655	)		57,903
Cash - beginning of period		385,888			44
Cash – end of period	$	25,233		$	57,947
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Common stock issued upon reverse merger	$	—		$	1,171
Common stock issued for consulting services	$	—		$	378,125
Conversion of accounts payable to convertible promissory note	$	—		$	50,000
Common stock issued to directors, officers and advisors	$	—		$	275,000
Cancellation of common shares	$	—		$	338
Conversion of notes payable and interest to equity	$	—		$	250,000
Common stock issued for consulting services	$	468,125		$	1,698,500
Common stock issued to directors, officers and advisors	$	275,000		$	1,779,500
Conversion of notes payable and interest to equity	$	831,758		$	—
Common stock issued as prepayment on kiosks	$	100,000		$	—
Sale of assets to pay down secured note	$	145,000		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements.

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

~~(Debtor-in-Possession)~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL~~MAY ~~STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~31, 2012

~~November 30, 2011~~(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. ~~Basis~~– ofBUSINESS ~~Presentation~~AND &NATURE ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies~~OF OPERATIONS

Public Media Works, Inc. (formerly Burnam Management, Inc.) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 3, 2000. The Company was originally engaged in the development, production, marketing and distribution of film, music and television entertainment media. On August 30, 2003, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with EntertainmentXpress, Inc., a private company formed to pursue opportunities in the film/TV and entertainment industry. The share exchange agreement is essentially a reverse merger with Public Media Works, Inc., the surviving company.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Public Media Works, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, EntertainmentXpress, Inc. (Collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has a working capital deficit, has no cash on hand, is in default of its outstanding debt agreements and has not generated revenues since September 23, 2011, the date the Company filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Bankruptcy Filing

OnThe ~~September 23, 2011, the~~ Company filed a voluntary petition on ~~for~~September 23, ~~relief~~2011 under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code inwith the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Riverside Division (the "“Bankruptcy Court"”). ~~The~~We ~~Chapter 11 Case~~will ~~Number~~continue ~~is: 6:11-bk-40137-MJ.~~to ~~The~~operate ~~purpose~~our business as "debtor-in-possession" ~~filing~~under the ~~Chapter 11~~jurisdiction ~~Case~~of ~~is to give~~ the ~~Company~~Court ~~time to restructure its debt obligations to its secured~~ and ~~unsecured~~in ~~creditors.~~accordance ~~Thereafter,~~with wethe ~~will~~applicable ~~prepare~~provisions ~~a Disclosure Statement and a Plan~~ of ~~Reorganization that describes our plan to emerge from Chapter 11as a viable company. We will file those documents with~~ the Bankruptcy ~~Court~~Code and ~~submit~~the ~~them~~order toof ~~all creditors for their approval with a view towards obtaining an Order from~~ the ~~Bankruptcy~~ Court, ~~confirming~~as ~~our~~we ~~Plan~~devote ofrenewed ~~Reorganization~~efforts soto ~~that~~resolve weour ~~may~~liquidity ~~successfully~~problems ~~exit~~and ~~from~~develop ~~Court~~a ~~protection~~reorganization plan.

~~The~~Pursuant ~~consolidated~~to ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~provisions as of ~~November~~the 30Bankruptcy Code, ~~2011~~we ~~and~~are ~~for~~not ~~the~~permitted ~~three~~to ~~and~~pay ~~nine~~any ~~months~~claims ~~then~~or ~~ended~~obligations ~~were~~which ~~prepared~~arose inprior ~~accordance~~to ~~with~~the ~~ASC~~filing ~~852~~date ~~“reorganizations”,~~(prepetition ~~which~~claims) ~~does~~unless ~~not~~specifically authorized ~~change~~by the ~~application~~Court ofor USas ~~GAAP~~may ~~with~~ultimately ~~respect~~be toprovided ~~the~~in ~~preparation~~a plan of ~~our financial statements~~reorganization. As ~~such~~Similarly, ~~the~~claimants ~~financial~~may ~~statements~~not ~~for~~enforce ~~the~~any claims ~~three~~against ~~and~~us ~~nine~~that ~~months~~arose ~~ended~~prior ~~November~~to ~~30,~~the ~~2011~~date ~~reflect~~of the ~~estimated~~filing. ~~realizable~~In ~~values~~addition, ofas ~~our~~a ~~assets~~debtor-in-possession, ~~and~~we ~~estimated~~have ~~fair~~the ~~value of our liabilities~~right, ~~and~~subject to ~~are~~the ~~therefore~~Court's ~~not~~approval, ~~comparable~~ to ~~the~~assume ~~financial~~or ~~statements~~reject ~~for~~any ~~the~~executory ~~three~~contracts and ~~nine~~unexpired ~~months~~leases ~~ended~~in ~~November~~existence ~~30,~~at ~~2010.~~the Asdate ~~part~~ of the ~~Chapter 11~~ filing,. Parties wehaving ~~anticipate~~claims ~~the~~as ~~development~~a ~~and~~result ~~implementation~~ of aany ~~plan~~such ofrejection ~~reorganization~~may tofile ~~restructure~~claims ~~our~~with ~~debt~~the ~~obligations~~Court ~~and~~which ~~business~~will ~~operations.~~be ~~Confirmation~~dealt ofwith aas ~~plan~~part of ~~reorganization would likely materially alter~~ the Chapter ~~classifications~~11 ~~and amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements~~case.

~~The~~It ~~condensed~~is ~~consolidated~~our ~~balance~~intention ~~sheet~~to asaddress all of our ~~February~~prepetition ~~28,~~claims ~~2011,~~in ~~which~~a ~~was~~plan ~~derived~~of ~~from~~reorganization ~~audited~~in ~~financial~~our ~~statements~~Chapter ~~has~~11 ~~been~~case. ~~prepared~~At ~~pursuant~~this juncture, it is impossible to predict with any degree of certainty how such a plan will treat such claims and the ~~rules~~impact that our Chapter 11 cases and ~~regulations~~any ofreorganization plan will have on the ~~Securities~~trading ~~and~~market ~~Exchange~~for ~~Commission~~our stock. ~~Certain~~Generally, ~~information~~under ~~and~~the ~~note~~provisions ~~disclosures~~of ~~normally~~the ~~included~~Bankruptcy inCode, ~~annual~~holders ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~equity interests ~~prepared~~may innot ~~accordance~~participate ~~with~~under ~~accounting~~a ~~principles~~plan ~~generally~~of ~~accepted~~reorganization inunless the ~~United~~claims ~~States~~of ~~have~~creditors ~~been~~are ~~condensed~~satisfied in full under the plan or ~~omitted~~unless ~~pursuant~~creditors accept a reorganization plan which permits holders of equity interests to ~~those~~participate. ~~rules~~The formulation and implementation ~~regulations,~~of ~~although~~a ~~the~~plan ~~Company~~of ~~believes~~reorganization ~~that~~in the ~~disclosures~~Chapter ~~made~~11 ~~are~~cases ~~adequate~~could totake ~~make~~a ~~the~~significant ~~information~~period ~~not~~of ~~misleading~~time.

InThe ~~the~~Chapter ~~opinion~~11 ofcase ~~management,~~is ~~all~~in ~~adjustments~~good ~~(consisting~~standing with ofthe ~~normal~~court ~~and~~having ~~recurring~~filed ~~adjustments~~all ~~as well as adjustments~~ required ~~for~~Monthly ~~entities~~Operating inReports ~~reorganization~~along ~~under~~with ~~the~~its ~~Bankruptcy~~Statement ~~Code) necessary for a fair presentation~~ of ~~the~~Liability ~~results of operations have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements~~Insurance. ~~These~~The ~~condensed~~Company requested ~~consolidated~~an ~~financial~~extension ~~statements~~to ~~should~~file beits ~~read~~Disclosure inStatement ~~conjunction with the consolidated financial statements~~ and ~~accompanying~~Plan ~~notes~~of ~~thereto~~Reorganization, ~~included~~accordingly, in the ~~“Company‘s~~ ~~Annual~~Bankruptcy ~~Report~~Court onagreed ~~Form~~to extend ~~10-K~~the asfiling ofdate ~~and~~ for the ~~year~~Disclosure ~~ended~~Statement ~~February~~and ~~28,~~Plan ~~2011,~~of asReorganization ~~filed~~to ~~with~~August ~~the~~20, ~~Securities Exchange Commission~~2012.

~~Use of Estimates~~6

The ~~preparation~~Company was required to apply the FASB’s provisions of ~~condensed~~reorganizations ~~consolidated~~effective on September 23, 2011, which is applicable to companies in Chapter 11 and generally does not change the manner in which financial statements inare ~~conformity~~prepared. ~~with~~However, ~~GAAP~~it ~~requires~~does ~~management~~require that the financial statements for periods subsequent to ~~make~~the ~~estimates~~filing of the bankruptcy filing petition distinguish transactions and ~~assumptions~~events that ~~affect~~are directly associated with the ~~reported~~reorganization ~~amounts~~from the ongoing operations of ~~assets~~the business. Revenues, expenses, realized gains and ~~liabilities~~losses, and ~~disclosure~~provisions for oflosses ~~contingent~~that ~~assets~~can ~~and~~be ~~liabilities~~directly atassociated with the ~~date~~reorganization and restructuring of the ~~condensed~~business ~~consolidated~~must ~~financial~~be reported separately as reorganization items in the consolidated statements ~~and~~of operations beginning in the year ended February 29, 2012. The balance sheet must distinguish pre-bankruptcy filing liabilities subject to compromise from both those pre-bankruptcy filing liabilities that are not subject to compromise and from post-bankruptcy filing liabilities. The Company continues to evaluate creditors' claims for other claims that may also have priority over unsecured creditors. Liabilities that may be affected by a plan of reorganization must be reported at the amounts ofexpected ~~revenues~~to ~~and~~be ~~expenses~~approved ~~during~~by the ~~reporting~~bankruptcy ~~period~~court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts as a result of the plan of reorganization. ~~Actual~~In ~~results~~addition, ~~could~~cash ~~differ~~used ~~from~~in ~~those~~reorganization ~~estimates~~items must be disclosed separately in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

NOTE 2 –SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant accounting policies are as follows:

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements as of May 31, 2012 and for the three months then ended were prepared in accordance with ASC 852 “reorganizations”, which does not change the application of US GAAP with respect to the preparation of our financial statements. As such, the financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 reflect the estimated realizable values of our assets and estimated fair value of our liabilities, and are therefore not comparable to the financial statements for the three months ended May 31, 2011. As part of the Chapter 11 filing, we anticipate the development and implementation of a plan of reorganization to restructure our debt obligations and business operations. Confirmation of a plan of reorganization would likely materially alter the classifications and amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2012, which was derived from audited financial statements, has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments as well as adjustments required for entities in reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included in the “Company‘s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended February 29, 2012, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net sales and expenses recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Going Concern and Liquidity Matters

On September 23, 2011, the Company filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and as such, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities during the normal course of business. Historically, the Company has incurred significant losses, and has not demonstrated the ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to satisfy its liabilities and sustain operations.

~~Inventory~~The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern; however, the above conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to do so. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

~~Inventory~~Management ~~was~~may ~~mainly~~seek comprised of our DVD and Blu-ray rental library and merchandise inventories held for rental and resale. Inventory, mainly consisted of finished goods, was stated at the lower of cost or market. Our DVD and Blu-ray library was capitalized and amortized to ~~estimated~~raise ~~salvage~~additional ~~value~~working ~~(sales~~capital ~~value~~through various offinancing ~~used~~sources ~~DVDs~~subject ~~and Blu-ray discs) on a straight-line basis~~ to ~~direct~~bankruptcy ~~operating~~court ~~expense~~approval, ~~over~~including the ~~average~~sale ~~estimated high usage periods~~ of the ~~DVDs~~Company’s equity and ~~Blu-rays~~debt securities, which ismay ~~typically~~not ~~four~~be ~~months.~~available ~~Inventory~~on ~~also~~commercially ~~included~~reasonable ~~a small amount of DVD cases and radio frequency identification devices (RFID tags). Due to our removing our kiosks from operation and the filing of the bankruptcy petition~~terms, ~~the~~if ~~Company~~at ~~wrote~~ all ~~inventories down to its estimated net realizable value and took a charge of approximately $26,000~~. OnIf ~~November~~such ~~22,~~financing ~~2011,~~is ~~the~~not ~~bankruptcy~~available ~~court approved the sale of majority of the Company’s assets and accordingly~~ on ~~November~~satisfactory 30terms, we ~~2011,~~may ~~the~~be ~~Company~~unable ~~executed~~to ~~the~~continue ~~Asset~~our ~~Purchase~~business ~~Agreement~~as ~~whereby majority of Company’s assets including its inventory were sold for an amount of $145,000~~desired.

6Income Taxes

~~PUBLIC~~Deferred ~~MEDIA~~income ~~WORKS,~~taxes ~~INC~~are provided to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

~~(Debtor-in-Possession)~~7

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL~~The ~~STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~Company follows the two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating the Company's tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments. At May 31, 2012, the Company did not record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

~~November~~Share-Based ~~30,~~Payment ~~2011~~Arrangements

~~Equipment~~Generally, all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights are measured at their fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable. The expenses resulting from share-based payments are recorded in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

At February 28, 2011, equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Due to the filing of the bankruptcy petition, at November 30, 2011, the Company wrote all equipment down to its estimated net realizable value and in the three and nine months ended November 30, 2011, the Company took a charge of approximately $370,000.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs were charged to expense as incurred. Included in the cost of the kiosk is the cost to deliver and install the kiosk as well as applicable sales tax. Items of property and equipment with costs greater than $1,000 were capitalized and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, as follows:

Description		Estimated Useful Life
Office equipment and furniture		2 to 5 years
Kiosks		5 years

Net Loss per Common Share – Basic and Diluted

Net loss per common share – basic and diluted is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued. As of ~~November~~May 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and February 2829, ~~2011~~2012, the Company had 11,595,~~791~~791warrants ~~and 8,497,291 warrants~~ outstanding~~, respectively~~. As of ~~November~~May 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and February 2829, ~~2011~~2012, the Company had 1,025,000 ~~and 4,005,000~~ stock options outstanding~~, respectively~~. Neither was included in the net loss per common share due to the options and warrants being anti-dilutive. Additionally, there were no adjustments to net loss to determine net loss available to common stockholders. As such, basic and diluted net loss per common share equals net loss, as reported, divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the respective periods.

~~Recent Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements~~Reclassifications

InCertain ~~January~~prior ~~2010,~~period ~~the~~amounts ~~Financial~~have ~~Accounting~~been reclassified ~~Standards~~to ~~Board~~conform ~~(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-19 (“ASU 2010-19”), New and Enhanced Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 provides amendments~~ to ~~FASB~~current ~~ASC~~period ~~820-10 that requires new fair value disclosures and clarifies existing fair value disclosures required under FASB ASC 820-10~~presentations. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for certain disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the new provisions within ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

InRecent ~~May~~Accounting 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Under the amendments of this ASU will result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This ASU is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.Pronouncements

2.Adopted ~~Proceedings Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code~~-

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Under the amendments of this ASU will result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This ASU is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Not Adopted -

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this update require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. This update will enhance disclosures required by U.S. GAAP by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments. The requirements of this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Entities should provide the disclosures required retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2011-11 on the consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s management does not believe that any recently issued effective pronouncements, or pronouncements issued but not yet effective, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 – PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

On September 23, 2011 (the "Petition Date"), the Company filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court. The petition was filed in order to enable the Company to pursue reorganization efforts under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company continues to operate its business as debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. In general, as debtor-in-possession, the Company is authorized under Chapter 11 to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside of the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

No assurance can be provided as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the bankruptcy proceedings to the Company's prepetition liabilities, common stock and other securities. Based upon the status of the Company's plan of reorganization, it is uncertain whether holders of our securities will receive any payment in respect of such securities.

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

November 30, 2011

Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Filing automatically enjoins, or stays, the continuation of any judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions against the Company or its property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, creditor actions to obtain possession of property from the Company, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against the property of the Company, or to collect on or otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a Prepetition claim are enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay.

In order to successfully exit Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the Company will need to propose, and obtain Bankruptcy Court confirmation of, a plan of reorganization that satisfies the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. A plan of reorganization would, among other things, resolve the Debtors' prepetition obligations, set forth the revised capital structure of the newly reorganized entity, and provide for corporate governance subsequent to exit from bankruptcy.

Under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Company may assume, assume and assign, or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases, including real property and equipment leases, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. Rejection constitutes a court-authorized breach of the lease or contract in question and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves the Company of its future obligations under such lease or contract but creates a deemed prepetition claim for damages caused by such breach or rejection. Parties whose contracts or leases are rejected may file claims against the Company for damages.

The Company sold substantially all of its assets effective November 30, 2011 and the currently proposed plan of reorganization restricts the Company's management to liquidating the Company's assets and making distributions on allowed claims until all allowed claims are satisfied and reserves are established for disputed claims. When and if all allowed claims are satisfied or fully reserved for, it is not known at this time whether the Company will commence new business opportunities or liquidate, and the mechanism for making this determination has yet to be established. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, (i) acquiring assets; (ii) the ability of the Company to generate cash from operations; (iii) the ability of the Company to maintain adequate cash on hand; (iv) the ability of the Company to obtain confirmation of and to consummate a plan of reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code; and, (v) the cost, duration and outcome of the reorganization process. Uncertainty as to the outcome of these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is currently evaluating various courses of action to address the operational issues it is facing. There can be no assurance that any of these efforts will be successful. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

As a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities are subject to uncertainty. While operating as a debtor-in-possession under the protection of Chapter 11, and subject to Bankruptcy Court approval or otherwise as permitted in the normal course of business, the Company may sell or otherwise dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities for amounts other than those reflected in the financial statements. No adjustments to liabilities were recognized during the ~~nine~~twelve months ended ~~November~~February 3029, ~~2011~~2012.

Further, a plan of reorganization could materially change the amounts and classifications reported in our financial statements. Our historical financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments to the carrying value of assets or amounts of liabilities that might be necessary as a consequence of confirmation of a plan of reorganization.

Under the priority scheme established by the Bankruptcy Code, unless creditors agree otherwise, post-petition liabilities and prepetition liabilities must be satisfied or reserved for in full before shareholders of the Company are entitled to receive any distribution or retain any property under a plan of reorganization. The ultimate recovery, if any, to creditors and shareholders of the Company will not be determined until confirmation and consummation of a plan of reorganization. No assurance can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the Bankruptcy to each of these constituencies or what types or amounts of distributions, if any, they would receive. Accordingly, the Company urges that extreme caution be exercised with respect to existing and future investments in any of the Company's liabilities and/or securities.

Reorganization Items

Reorganization items represent the direct and incremental costs related to the Company’s Chapter 11 case, such as professional fees incurred, net of interest income earned on accumulated cash, if any, during the Chapter 11 process. These restructuring activities may result in additional charges and other adjustments for expected allowed claims (including claims that have been allowed by the Court) and other reorganization items that could be material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations in any given period. Total reorganization items amounted to $3,450 and $0 for the three months period ended May 31, 2012 and 2011.

3.NOTE ~~Prepaid Expenses~~4 ~~and~~– ~~Other~~LIABILITIES ~~Assets~~SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE

~~Prepaid~~As ~~expenses~~a ~~principally~~result ~~consisted~~of the bankruptcy filing, the payment of ~~deferred~~pre-petition ~~costs~~indebtedness ~~related~~is subject to ~~stock~~compromise ~~compensation~~or other treatment under a plan of reorganization. Generally, actions to ~~vendors~~enforce ~~where~~or ~~stock~~otherwise ~~has~~effect ~~been~~payment ~~issued~~of ~~for~~pre-bankruptcy ~~services~~filing liabilities are stayed. Although payment of pre-petition claims generally is not permitted, the bankruptcy court granted the Debtors authority to bepay ~~rendered~~certain pre-petition claims in designated categories and subject to certain terms and conditions. This relief generally was designed to preserve the ~~future~~value of the Company’s businesses and assets. ~~Stock~~Among isother ~~subject~~things, the bankruptcy court authorized us to ~~repurchase~~pay ifcertain ~~services~~pre-petition ~~are~~claims ~~not~~relating ~~rendered~~to wages and benefits and professional fees.

	November 30, 2011		February 28, 2011
Investor relations fees	$	—	$	316,667
Deposits		—		2,500
Insurance		—		4,182
Rent		—		8,621
Legal retainer		—		5,983
Other		2,000		8,775
Total prepaid expenses and deposits	$	2,000	$	346,728

We have been paying and intend to continue to pay undisputed post-petition claims in the ordinary course of business. In addition, we may reject pre-petition executory contracts and unexpired leases with respect to our operations, with the approval of the bankruptcy court. Any damages resulting from rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases are treated as general unsecured claims and will be classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” in our consolidated balance sheets. We previously notified all known claimants subject to the bar date of their need to file a proof of claim with the bankruptcy court. A bar date is the date by which claims against the Company must be filed if the claimants disagree with the amounts included in our schedule of assets and liabilities filed with the bankruptcy court and wish to receive any distribution in the bankruptcy filing. The Company and our retained professionals are continuing to review and analyze the proofs of claim submitted by claimants and will investigate any material differences between these claims and liability amounts estimated by the Company. If necessary, in the event of a claims dispute, the bankruptcy court will make a final determination whether such claims should be allowed and, if so, the appropriate amount of such allowed claims. The ultimate amount of such liabilities is not determinable at this time.

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

November 30, 2011

The Company had a four to eight week lead time between when it orders a kiosk and when it is delivered for deployment. Upon order and again prior to shipment, the Company had to make partial payment for the cost of the kiosk. As the manufacturer retains ownership until the kiosk is deployed, these up-front payments were treated as deposits until the kiosks are received. As of November 30, 2011, the Company had no kiosks on order compared to 25 at February 28, 2011.

4. Equipment and Asset Purchase Agreement

On November 22, 2011, the bankruptcy court approved the sale of majority of the Company’s assets and accordingly on November 30, 2011, the Company executed the Asset Purchase Agreement whereby majority of Company’s assets including its inventory were sold for an amount of $145,000 to an unrelated party. Accordingly, as of November 30, 2011 and February 28, 2011 the Company did not have any assets in place. In relation to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company recorded approximately $71,000 as loss on sale of assets.

Depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2011 amounted to $0 and $48,996, respectively. During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2011, and right before the consummation of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company wrote its equipment down to estimated net realizable value and took a charge of approximately $370,000.

5. Liabilities Subject to Compromise

Liabilities subject to compromise at November 30, 2011 and February 28, 2011 include the following pre-petition liabilities:

	November 30,		February 28,
	2011		2011
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	448,531	$	271,562
Due to stockholders		180,000		14,000
Note payable		65,000		27,090
8% Note to George Mainas/Mainas Development Corporation		48,687		465,409
9% Line of Credit to George Mainas/Mainas Development Corporation		207,307		310,835
7% Note payable to Steve Davis		27,423		26,441
10% Note due to Niesar Vestal, LLP		55,306		52,500
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	1,032,254	$	1,167,837

On November 30, 2011 and in relation to the Asset Purchase Agreement mentioned above, the court approved the sale of majority of Company’s assets and concurrently using the funds from the sale to partially pay down the 8% Note to George Mainas which was the only secured note. Accordingly, the balance of this note was re-classified to liabilities subject to compromise as no more assets are available to satisfy the secured credit obligation.

~~PUBLIC~~Pre-petition ~~MEDIA~~liabilities ~~WORKS~~that are subject to compromise are required to be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, ~~INC~~even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. The amounts currently classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” may be subject to future adjustments depending on bankruptcy court actions, further developments with respect to disputed claims, determinations of the secured status of certain claims, the values of any collateral securing such claims, or other events. We expect that certain amounts currently classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” may in fact be paid in the ordinary course as they come due. Any resulting changes in classification will be reflected in subsequent financial statements.

~~(Debtor-in-Possession)~~Liabilities subject to compromise consist of the following as of May 31, 2012 and February 29, 2012:

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	448,531
Due to stockholders		180,000
Note payable		65,000
8% Note to George Mainas/Mainas Development Corporation		48,687
9% Line of Credit to George Mainas/Mainas Development Corporation		207,307
7% Note payable to Steve Davis		27,423
10% Note due to Niesar Vestal, LLP		55,306
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	1,032,254

~~November~~With 30the bankruptcy filing on September 23, 2011, the Company ceased accruing interest on its outstanding debt based upon its belief it will not be an allowed priority, secured or unsecured claim.

6.On ~~Convertible~~November 30, 2011 and in relation to an Asset Purchase Agreement, the court approved the sale of majority of Company’s assets and concurrently using the funds from the sale to partially pay down the 8% Note to George Mainas which was the only secured note. Accordingly, the balance of this note was re-~~Post~~classified to ~~Petition~~liabilities subject to compromise as no more assets are available to satisfy the secured credit obligation.

OnNOTE November 9, 2011, the Company issued an unsecured convertible note for an amount of $25,000 and bears interest at 8% per year. The term of the note is one year from the date where the Company obtains the Bankruptcy Court approval for the financing; the Company obtained such approval on November 22, 2011. The outstanding principal and interest on this note is convertible at any time on or after the date of Bankruptcy Court approval into Company’s shares of common stock on the basis of five (5) ~~shares~~– ~~for~~Convertible Note-Post each $0.01. In accordance with the applicable guidance in GAAP, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) for an amount of $25,000 on date of issuance. The BCF amount was calculated as the difference between the market price and conversion price on date of issuance and was charged to operations on such date.Petition

7During the twelve months ended February 29, 2012, the Company issued two unsecured convertible notes for a total amount of $50,000 (first note was dated November 9, 2011 for $25,000 and second note was dated December 14, 2011 for an amount of $25,000) and bears interest at 8% per year. ~~Common Stock~~The term of the notes is one year from the date where the Company obtains the Bankruptcy Court approval for the financing; the Company obtained such approval on November 22, 2011. The outstanding principal and interest on these notes are convertible at any time on or after the date of Bankruptcy Court approval into Company’s shares of common stock on the basis of five (5) shares for each $0.01. In accordance with the applicable guidance in GAAP, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) for an amount of $25,000 on date of issuance. The BCF amount was calculated as the difference between the market price and conversion price on date of issuance and was charged to operations on such date.

On March 7, 2011, the board of directors accelerated the vesting on 583,335 shares due Martin W. Greenwald, CEO and Chairman under an employment agreement between Mr. Greenwald and the Company. The Board also authorized an additional 500,000 fully vested shares to be issued to Mr. Greenwald. The Company recorded $695,646 in expense related to these issuances in the nine months ended November 30, 2011.

On March 7, 2011, the Company issued 687,500 shares to four consultants for services rendered. The Company recorded $378,125 in consulting expense in the three months ended May 31, 2011 as the grants were for past services and vested immediately to the holder.

On March 7, 2011, the Company executed a common stock and warrant agreement with an accredited investor for $79,000 in cash. The accredited investor received 316,000 common stock and 316,000 warrants to purchase an additional share of the Company at $0.40 within three years. As of November 30, 2011, the accredited investor held 316,000 warrants related to this purchase.

In May and June 2011, the Company agreed to convert $400,000 of long-term debt and related interest by issuing 1,600,000 common shares and 1,600,000 warrants. The investors were granted piggyback registration rights for the shares of common stock and shares underlying the warrants. The shares of the Company’s common stock are freely trading securities, under SEC Rule 144. The warrants have a life of three years and are convertible at $0.40 per share.

In June 2011, one consultant made a cashless exercise of a stock option and 128,571 shares were issued.

In June 2011, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock to a supplier. In return, the supplier agreed to give the Company a discount on future purchases of kiosks.

On August 2, 2011, the Company issued 600,000 shares to Salzwedel Financial Services for services to be rendered. The Company expensed this amount in the period ended November 30, 2011.

In August 2011, one creditor elected to convert $7,408 of accounts payable into 74,085 shares of common stock of the Company.

In the quarter ending August 31, 2011, the Company executed common stock agreements with five accredited investors for $137,000 in cash. The accredited investors received 1,370,000 shares of common stock and one investor received 750,000 warrants to purchase an additional share of the Company at $0.10 within three years. These sales triggered an anti-dilution clause in the aforementioned $400,000 conversion of debt to equity and an additional 2,121,750 shares of common stock were issued.

~~PUBLIC~~NOTE ~~MEDIA~~6 ~~WORKS,~~– ~~INC.~~SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

~~(Debtor-in-Possession)~~Stock Option Plans

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL~~The ~~STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~Company has 2007 and 2010 Equity Incentive Plans. The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which permits the grant of awards in the form of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards and stock units to its key employees for up to 1 million shares of common stock. There were no new stock options granted, exercised or expired during the quarter ended May 31, 2012.

~~November~~The 30Company has the following options outstanding and exercisable as of May 31, ~~2011~~2012.

8. Share Based Compensation

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Aggregate

Exercise

Contractual

Intrinsic

Options

Price

Life (Years)

Value

Outstanding and Exercisable at May 31, 2012

1,025,000

0.83

3.47

—

The Company has 2007 and 2010 Equity Incentive Plans. The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which permits the grant of awards in the form of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards and stock units to its key employees for up to 1 million shares of common stock. The Company believes that such awards promote the long-term success of the Company and the creation of stockholder value by offering key employees an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the success of the Company, or to increase such interest, and to encourage such key employees to continue to provide services to the Company and to attract new individuals with outstanding qualifications. Awards are generally granted with an exercise price that approximates the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Because the Black-Scholes option valuation model incorporate ranges of assumptions for inputs, those ranges are disclosed. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is derived from estimates and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

	Nine months ended November 30,
	2011			2010
Expected Volatility		70	%		697.86	%
Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
Expected terms (in years)	1 to 3				5.0
Risk-free rate	0.25% to 1.22		%		1.47	%
Forfeiture rate		20	%		0	%

A summary of option activity as of November 30, 2011, and changes during the period then ended is presented below:

				Weighted-		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Options			Price		Life (Years)		Value
Outstanding at February, 2011		4,005,000		$	0.99		3.67	$	205,000
Granted		3,015,000			0.62
Exercised		(200,000	)		0.10		—		—
Forfeited or expired		(5,795,000	)		0.96		—		—
Outstanding at November 30, 2011		1,025,000			0.83		0.65		—
Exercisable at November 30, 2011		892,123		$	0.88		3.92		—

During the nine months ended November 30, 2011, 128,571 shares were issued in connection with the cashless exercise of 200,000 options.

The Company has an additional $33,843 to expense in future periods for unvested stock options. There was no unvested compensation as of November 30, 2010. During the nine months ended November 30, 2011, 3,015,000 stock options were granted. The Company has recorded a stock option expense of $2,006 and $878,126 in three and nine months ended November 30, 2011, respectively, in general and administrative expenses. Due to the Company filing for bankruptcy and termination of almost all employees, an additional 4,345,000 option were forfeited during the quarter ended November 30, 2011 which represent the number of options that were not exercised within 90 days of termination for the respective employees.

Warrants

~~The~~There ~~fair~~were ~~value~~no ofnew ~~each~~warrants ~~warrant~~granted, isexercised ~~estimated~~or onexpired during the ~~date~~quarter ofended ~~grant~~May ~~using the Black-Scholes valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Because the Black-Scholes valuation model incorporates ranges of assumptions for inputs~~31, ~~those ranges are disclosed~~2012. ~~Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock.~~ The Company ~~uses~~has ~~historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination and forfeiture rates within~~ the ~~valuation~~following ~~model. The expected term of~~ warrants ~~granted~~outstanding ~~is derived from estimates~~ and ~~represents~~exercisable ~~the~~as ~~period~~ of ~~time~~May ~~that~~31, ~~warrants granted are expected to be outstanding~~2012. ~~The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the warrant is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.~~

	November 30,
	Warrants			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	2011
Outstanding and Exercisable at May 31, 2012		11,595,791		$	0.32		1.68		—
Expected volatility		70	%
Expected dividends		—
Expected terms (in years)		3
Risk-free rate		0.79	%
Forfeiture rate		0	%

11NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

November 30, 2011

A summary of warrant activity for the nine months ended November 30, 2011, is presented below:

	Warrants			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at February 28, 2011		8,497,291		$	0.36		2.81	$	2,379,427
Granted		3,316,000		$	0.26		2.59
Exercised		—		$	—		—		—
Forfeited or expired		(217,500	)	$	1.25		—		—
Outstanding at November 30, 2011		11,595,791		$	0.32		2.18		—
Exercisable at November 30, 2011		11,595,791		$	0.32		2.18		—

There were no warrants exercised during the nine months ended November 30, 2011 or 2010. There were no unvested warrants as of November 30, 2011. During the nine months ended November 30, 2011, the Company issued 3,316,000 warrants to six investors at an average exercise price $0.26. In relation to 1,600,000 of these warrants, using the Black-Scholes valuation model the Company then recorded a loss on conversion of debt of $392,468.

9. Income Taxes

The Company has commenced analyzing filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions (California) where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The last tax return filed by the Company was for the year ended February 28, 2007.

Due to the existence of a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, future changes in our unrecognized tax benefits will not impact the Company’s effective tax rate.

As a corporation, the Company is primarily subject to U.S. federal and state income tax. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of ~~November~~May 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~November 30~~2011, ~~2010,~~ the Company had no accruals for interest or penalties related to income tax matters.

12* * * * * *

~~Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.~~11

~~The~~ITEM ~~following~~2 ~~discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with its condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes. This discussion contains forward~~-~~looking~~ ~~statements~~MANAGEMENT’S ~~based~~DISCUSSION ~~upon~~AND ~~current~~ANALYSIS ~~expectations~~OF ~~that~~FINANCIAL CONDITION ~~involve~~AND ~~risks~~RESULTS ~~and~~OF uncertainties, such as its plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Its actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.OPERATIONS

~~Overview~~CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

~~The~~This discussion may contain forward-looking statements about the future performance of our Company, and ~~its~~is ~~wholly~~based on our assumptions and beliefs in light of information currently available. We assume no obligation to update this information. These forward-~~owned~~looking ~~subsidiary~~statements are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements, ~~EntertainmentXpress~~including, ~~Inc.~~but not limited to: the ability of the Debtors to continue as going concerns; the ability of the Debtors to obtain Bankruptcy Court approval with respect to motions in the Chapter 11 cases; the ability of the Debtors to prosecute, adevelop ~~California~~and ~~corporation~~consummate ~~(“EntertainmentXpress”)~~one or more plans of reorganization with respect to the Chapter 11 cases; the effects of the Bankruptcy Filing on the Debtors and the interests of various creditors, ~~were~~equity ~~engaged~~holders and other constituents; Bankruptcy Court rulings in the ~~business~~Chapter 11 cases and the outcome of ~~offering~~the ~~self~~cases in general; the length of time the Debtors will operate under the Chapter 11 cases; risks associated with third-~~service~~party motions ~~Kiosks~~in the Chapter 11 cases, which ~~deliver~~may ~~DVD~~interfere with the ability of the Debtors to develop and ~~Blu-ray~~consummate ~~movies~~one or more plans of reorganization once such plans are developed; the potential adverse effects of the Chapter 11 proceedings on the Debtors’ liquidity or results of operations; the ability to execute Debtors’ business and restructuring plan and to timely and effectively implement the turnaround strategy; increased legal costs related to the Bankruptcy Filing and other ~~potentially~~litigation; the costs and other ~~products~~effects of lawsuits and administrative proceedings; changes in the capital markets which may affect our cost of capital or the ability to ~~consumers~~access capital; regulatory compliance. Refer to Risk Factors included in this quarterly report. Factors and risks that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those identified in the section titled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2012, as well as other factors that we are currently unable to identify or quantify, but that may exist in the future.

In addition, the foregoing factors may affect generally our business, results of operations and financial position. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Except for historical information contained herein, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future events and the Company’s plans and expectations. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q or incorporated herein by reference, including those set forth in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In order to maintain clarity in this report, references to the business of the Company’s subsidiary EntertainmentXpress will be indicated as “EntertainmentXpress”; and references to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to the combined businesses of Public Media Works, Inc. and EntertainmentXpress after May 4, 2010.

~~Proceedings Under Chapter 11~~Overview

The Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, EntertainmentXpress, Inc., a California corporation (“EntertainmentXpress”), were engaged in the business of offering self-service Kiosks which deliver DVD and Blu-ray movies and other potentially other products to consumers. We are no longer in this business.

Corporate History

Prior to May 2010, the Company was historically engaged in the development, production, marketing and distribution of film, music and television entertainment titles. The Company has an ownership interest in several film and television projects. As of May 4, 2010 with the acquisition of Entertainment Xpress, Inc., the Company focused exclusively on its kiosk business. In March 2011, the Company installed its first 25 kiosks under the DBA of “Spot. The difference™”.

The Company completed its share exchange of EntertainmentXpress on May 4, 2010. The Company owns 100% of the outstanding shares of EntertainmentXpress, which is a subsidiary of the Company. The EntertainmentXpress subsidiary is currently inactive. While our initial test marketing in mid-2010 was under the EntertainmentXpress brand, with the beta test of our new kiosks in March 2011, we began using the brand “Spot Rentals™” and “Spot. The difference™” tag line. In August 2011, the Company discontinued its kiosk operations due to having insufficient operating capital.

We are now an entity with no operations. As of the date hereof, we have not been successful in any of our prior business operations.

Historically, we were able to raise a limited amount of capital through private placements of our equity stock, but we are uncertain about our continued ability to raise funds privately.

Our management has been analyzing the various alternatives available to us to ensure our survival and to preserve our shareholder's investment in our common shares. This analysis has included sourcing additional forms of financing to continue our business as is, or mergers and/or acquisitions. At this stage in our operations, we believe either course is acceptable, as our operations have not been profitable and our future prospects for our business are not good without further financing.

We are focusing our preliminary merger/acquisition activities on potential business opportunities with established business entities for the merger of a target business with our company. In certain instances, a target business may wish to become a subsidiary of our company or may wish to contribute assets to our company rather than merge. We anticipate that any new acquisition or business opportunities by our company will require additional financing. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to acquire the financing necessary to enable us to pursue our plan of operation. If our company requires additional financing and we are unable to acquire such funds, our business may fail.

In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition or opportunity, we may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. We may also acquire stock or assets of an existing business. Upon the consummation of a transaction, it is likely that our present management will no longer be in control of our company and our existing business will close down. In addition, it is likely that our officers and directors will, as part of the terms of the acquisition transaction, resign and be replaced by one or more new officers and directors.

We anticipate that the selection of a business opportunity in which to participate will be complex and without certainty of success. Management believes that there are numerous firms in various industries seeking the perceived benefits of being a publicly registered corporation. Business opportunities may be available in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

We may seek a business opportunity with entities that have recently commenced operations, or entities that wish to utilize the public marketplace in order to raise additional capital in order to expand business development activities, to develop a new product or service, or for other corporate purposes. We may acquire assets and establish wholly-owned subsidiaries in various businesses or acquire existing businesses as subsidiaries.

At this stage, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to locate compatible business opportunities, what additional financing we will require to complete a combination or merger with another business opportunity or whether the opportunity's operations will be profitable.

If we are unable to secure adequate capital to continue our business or alternatively, complete a merger or acquisition, our shareholders will lose some or all of their investment and our business will likely fail.

The Company filed a voluntary petition on September 23, 2011 under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Riverside Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”). We will continue to operate our business as "debtor-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the order of the Court, as we devote renewed efforts to resolve our liquidity problems and develop a reorganization plan.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, we are not permitted to pay any claims or obligations which arose prior to the filing date (prepetition claims) unless specifically authorized by the Court or as may ultimately be provided in a plan of reorganization. Similarly, claimants may not enforce any claims against us that arose prior to the date of the filing. In addition, as a debtor-in-possession, we have the right, subject to the Court's approval, to assume or reject any executory contracts and unexpired leases in existence at the date of the filing. Parties having claims as a result of any such rejection may file claims with the Court which will be dealt with as part of the Chapter 11 case.

It is our intention to address all of our prepetition claims in a plan of reorganization in our Chapter 11 case. At this juncture, it is impossible to predict with any degree of certainty how such a plan will treat such claims and the impact that our Chapter 11 cases and any reorganization plan will have on the trading market for our stock. Generally, under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, holders of equity interests may not participate under a plan of reorganization unless the claims of creditors are satisfied in full under the plan or unless creditors accept a reorganization plan which permits holders of equity interests to participate. The formulation and implementation of a plan of reorganization in the Chapter 11 cases could take a significant period of time.

13The Chapter 11 case is in good standing with the court having filed all required Monthly Operating Reports along with its Statement of Liability Insurance. The Company requested an extension to file its Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization, accordingly, the Bankruptcy Court agreed to extend the filing date for the Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization to August 20, 2012.

~~Results~~In November, 2011, Debtor reached an agreement with ELO Media ("ELO") regarding a reverse merger and started to prepare the necessary documents, including a Share Exchange Agreement and a Disclosure Statement. At a hearing on May 2, 2012 on the United States Trustee's Motion to Convert/Dismiss, Debtor represented that the documents were nearing completion and that Debtor anticipated filing its Disclosure Statement in the near future. The Court, at that hearing set a hearing on the Disclosure Statement for July 25, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. On or about May 24, 2012, ELO advised the Debtor that it had decided to withdraw from the transaction and would not be proceeding with the Share Exchange Agreement. Since then, Debtor sought other companies with which to merge, ultimately reaching a Memorandum of ~~Operations~~Understanding with a Private Company on June 12, 2012.

~~Revenue~~Debtor is in the process of negotiating a new Share Exchange Agreement with a Private Company and believes that it will be in a position to file its Disclosure Statement within approximately Thirty (30) days.

InTHERE ~~early~~CAN ~~2011,~~BE ~~the~~NO ~~Company~~ASSURANCES ~~entered~~THAT ~~the~~NEGOTIATIONS WITH ~~start-up~~ANY ~~phase~~PROSPECTIVE ~~of operation. In the three and nine months ended November 30~~BUSINESS, ~~2011~~INCLUDING itBUT ~~generated~~NOT $0LIMITED ~~and~~TO ~~$39,116~~THE inENTITIES ~~revenue~~DISCUSSED ~~as compared to $239 and $578 in revenues for the three and nine months ended November 30~~ABOVE, ~~2010.~~WILL ~~Revenue~~RESULT inIN ~~the~~A ~~nine~~MERGER ~~months~~WITH ~~ended~~OUR ~~November~~COMPANY OR ~~30,~~THAT ~~2011~~SUCH ~~came~~MERGER ~~principally~~WILL ~~from~~RESULT 25IN ~~kiosks placed in operation in March 2011 and going through beta testing~~PROFITABILITY. The Company was using a newly manufactured kiosk and operating software. As the Company was unable to raise additional equity to continue operating the kiosks, in early September, 2011, the Company removed the kiosks and placed them in storage until they were sold on November 30, 2011. The remainder of revenue during periods came from a joint venture in Canada. No future revenue is expected from this joint venture.

For the three and nine months ended November 30, 2011, the Company’s operating expenses were $37,042 and $4,529,425 respectively, compared to operating expenses of $3,195,491 and $4,955,264, respectively, for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2010.

	Three months ended November 30,				Nine months ended November 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Direct operating expenses		—		—		169,604		—
General and administrative expenses		37,042		3,195,491		4,359,821		4,955,264
Total expenses		37,042		3,195,491		4,529,425		4,955,264

The increase in the direct operating expenses is a direct result of placing the kiosks in operations. Direct operating expenses principally include: amortization of our DVD and Blu-Ray movie inventory; commissions or fees to retailers; credit card fees and field operations support, such as loading and cleaning the kiosks and monitoring the kiosks. In addition, in the three and nine months ended November 30, 2011, the Company wrote off $16,117 of prepaid support due to its removing the kiosks from retail locations.

General and administrative expenses during the nine months period ending November 30, 2011 amounted to $4,359,821consisted primarily of $3,429,275 non-cash charges related to issuance of stock, restricted stock and stock options to officers and consultants. General and administrative expenses decreased significantly during the three months ended November 30, 2011 to $37,042 due to entering into bankruptcy proceedings on September 23, 2011 accordingly departure of all employees and discontinuing our operating activities, this amount consisted primarily of $25,000 related to the beneficial conversion feature for the convertible note issued in November 2011.

General and administrative expenses during the three and nine month periods ending November 30, 2010, was primarily due to a Company restructuring during the first quarter of May 31, 2010. Included in the general and administrative expenses above for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2010 is stock compensation expense of $1,647,215 and $2,365,198, respectively. Also included are stock option and warrant expense of $754,364 and $1,588,219, respectively.

~~Liquidity~~Critical ~~and~~Accounting ~~Capital Resources~~Policies

InUse ~~September~~of ~~2011,~~Estimates ~~the Company decided to cease operating the kiosks~~ and ~~place~~Critical ~~the~~Accounting kiosks in a safe warehouse location while it reorganized under a voluntary bankruptcy filing (Chapter 11). The Company is seeking $150,000 to allow it to operate under the protection of the U.S. bankruptcy laws while it converts most of its non-secured debt, including accounts payable, to equity as well as renegotiating its agreements with its secured creditor. Finally, it will need to raise additional equity to continue to fund its operations beyond the three to four months it believes it will take it to go through the bankruptcy process. However, there can be no assurance as to whether, when, or upon what terms the Company will be able to consummate any additional financing.Policies

~~USE~~The OFpreparation ~~ESTIMATES~~of ~~AND~~financial ~~CRITICAL~~statements in ~~ACCOUNTING~~conformity ~~POLICIES~~with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net sales and expenses recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

~~Our~~These ~~discussion~~estimates and ~~analysis~~assumptions ofalso ~~our~~affect ~~financial~~the ~~condition~~reported ~~and results~~ amounts of ~~operations~~revenues, ~~are~~costs ~~based~~and onexpenses ~~our~~during ~~condensed~~the ~~consolidated~~reporting ~~financial~~period. Management ~~statements,~~evaluates ~~which~~these ~~have~~estimates ~~been~~and ~~prepared~~assumptions inon a ~~accordance~~regular ~~with~~basis. Actual ~~accounting~~results ~~principles~~could ~~generally~~differ ~~accepted~~from inthose ~~the United States (“US GAAP”)~~estimates.

Management believes the most critical accounting policies, among others, will affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements are discussed in Note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We presently have no operations but our plan of operation is to identify and merge with a potential merger candidate/candidates to create new shareholder value and reestablish the Company going forward.

Three Months Ended May 31, 2012, Compared to Three Months Ended May 31, 2011

Compared to no revenue generated in the three months ended May 31, 2012, the Company entered the start-up phase of operation during the first quarter ended May 31, 2011 and generated $20,236 in revenue. Those revenues in fiscal 2011 came principally from 25 kiosks placed in operation in March 2011 and going through beta testing. The Company was using a newly manufactured kiosk and operating software.

During the three months ended May 31, 2012, the Company’s cost of revenue (direct operating expenses) was $0, compared to $63,713 in the three months ended May 31, 2011. Cost incurred in fiscal 2011 was a direct result of placing the kiosks in operations. Direct operating expenses principally include: amortization of our DVD and Blu-Ray movie inventory; commissions or fees to retailers; credit card fees and field operations support, such as loading and cleaning the kiosks and monitoring the kiosks.

General and administrative expenses (“G&A”) totaled $1,400 for the three months ended May 31, 2012, compared to $2,837,145 in the 2011 period. General and administrative expenses decreased significantly compared to fiscal 2011 due to entering into bankruptcy proceedings on September 23, 2011, accordingly departure of all employees and discontinuing our operating activities.

Reorganization items represent the direct and incremental costs related to the Company’s Chapter 11 case, including professional fees incurred, net of interest income earned on accumulated cash, if any, during the Chapter 11 process. Total reorganization items amounted to $3,450 and $0 for the three months period ended May 31, 2012 and 2011.

Interest expense was $0 for May 31, 2012 and $15,091 for 2011. Interest expense includes accrued and unpaid interest on our debt.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We currently have a total accumulated deficit of $19,487,301 as of May 31, 2012, current assets of $2,000, and current liabilities of $1,106,106 as of May 31, 2012. We are currently in default on all of our debt and have been unable to raise the capital to pay such notes. Should the note holders call their notes, we would be unable to pay them.

~~The~~We ~~preparation~~do ofnot ~~these~~presently ~~condensed~~generate ~~consolidated~~any ~~financial~~revenue to ~~statements~~fund ~~requires~~the ~~management~~planned todevelopment ~~make~~of ~~estimates~~our ~~and~~business. ~~judgments~~In ~~that~~order ~~affect~~to ~~the~~develop ~~reported~~our ~~amounts~~business ofplan, ~~assets~~we ~~liabilities~~will ~~and~~require ~~the~~funds ~~disclosure~~for ofworking ~~contingent~~capital. We ~~assets~~do ~~and~~not ~~liabilities~~presently athave ~~the~~any ~~date~~firm ofcommitments ~~the~~for ~~condensed~~additional ~~consolidated~~working ~~financial~~capital ~~statements~~ and ~~the~~there ~~reported~~are ~~amounts~~no ofassurances ~~revenues~~that ~~and~~such ~~expenses~~capital ~~during~~will be ~~each~~available ~~reporting~~to ~~period.~~us Onwhen anneeded ~~ongoing~~or ~~basis,~~upon ~~management~~terms ~~evaluates its estimates~~ and ~~assumptions,~~conditions ~~including~~which ~~those~~are ~~related~~acceptable to ~~income~~us. ~~taxes,~~If ~~long~~we ~~lived~~are ~~asset~~able ~~valuation,~~to ~~and~~secure ~~stock~~additional ~~based~~working capital ~~compensation.~~through ~~Management~~the ~~bases~~sale ~~its~~of ~~estimates~~equity ~~and~~securities, ~~judgments~~the onownership ~~historical~~interests ~~experience~~ of ~~operations~~our ~~and~~current onstockholders ~~various~~will ~~other~~be ~~factors~~diluted. ~~that~~If ~~are~~we ~~believed~~raise additional toworking becapital ~~reasonable~~through ~~under~~ the ~~circumstances,~~issuance ~~the~~of ~~results~~debt ofour ~~which~~future ~~form~~interest ~~the~~expense ~~basis~~will ~~for~~increase. ~~making~~We ~~judgments~~are ~~about~~currently ~~the~~in ~~carrying~~default on ~~value~~our all of ~~assets~~our outstanding debt and ~~liabilities~~have ~~that~~been ~~are~~unable ~~not~~to ~~readily~~raise ~~apparent~~the ~~from~~capital ~~other~~to ~~sources~~pay such notes. ~~Actual~~Should ~~results~~the ~~may~~debt ~~differ~~holders ~~from~~call ~~these~~their notes, ~~estimates~~we ~~under~~would ~~different~~be ~~assumptions~~unable orto ~~conditions~~pay them.

~~Recent~~The ~~Accounting~~accompanying ~~Pronouncements~~consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplate continuation of our company as a going concern. However, we have a working capital deficit and have not generated revenues since we filed for bankruptcy. During the three months ended May 31, 2012, we incurred a net loss of $4,850 and at May 31, 2012 have an accumulated deficit of $19,487,301. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of our company to continue as a going concern. We are dependent upon funds from private investors and the support of certain stockholders. Management is proposing to raise any necessary additional funds through loans and additional sales of its common stock. There is no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional capital. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. On September 23, 2011, the Company filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Riverside Division (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The Chapter 11 Case Number is: 6:11-bk-40137-MJ.

InWe ~~January~~are ~~2010,~~currently ~~the~~operating ~~Financial~~as ~~Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010~~debtors-19in-possession pursuant ~~(“ASU~~to ~~2010-19”),~~Bankruptcy ~~New~~Filing and ~~Enhanced~~continuation ~~Disclosures~~of ~~about~~our ~~Fair~~Company ~~Value~~as ~~Measurements.~~a ~~ASU 2010~~going-06concern ~~provides~~is ~~amendments~~contingent toupon, ~~FASB~~among ~~ASC~~other ~~820-10~~things, ~~that~~the ~~requires~~Debtors’ ability ~~new~~(i) to ~~fair~~comply ~~value~~with ~~disclosures~~the terms and ~~clarifies~~conditions ~~existing~~of ~~fair~~any ~~value~~DIP ~~disclosures~~Credit ~~required~~Agreement; ~~under~~(ii) to ~~FASB~~develop ~~ASC~~a ~~820-10.~~plan ~~The new disclosures and clarifications~~ of ~~existing disclosures are effective for interim~~ reorganization and ~~annual~~obtain ~~reporting~~confirmation ~~periods~~of ~~beginning~~that ~~after~~plan ~~December~~under ~~15,~~the ~~2009,~~Bankruptcy ~~except~~Code; ~~for~~(iii) to ~~certain~~reduce ~~disclosures~~debt ~~about purchases, sales, issuances,~~ and ~~settlements~~other inliabilities through the ~~roll~~bankruptcy process; ~~forward~~(iv) to ~~activity~~return into ~~Level~~profitability; 3(v) to ~~fair~~generate ~~value~~sufficient ~~measurements.~~cash ~~Those~~flow ~~disclosures~~from ~~are~~future ~~effective~~operations ~~for~~through ~~fiscal~~a ~~years~~merger candidate; ~~beginning~~and ~~after~~(vi) to ~~December~~obtain ~~15,~~financing ~~2010,~~sources ~~and~~to ~~for~~meet ~~interim~~our ~~periods~~future ~~within those fiscal years~~obligations. The ~~adoption~~uncertainty ofregarding ~~the~~these matters ~~new~~raises ~~provisions~~substantial ~~within~~doubt ~~ASU~~about ~~2010-06 did not have a material impact on~~ our ~~consolidated~~ability ~~financial~~to ~~position,~~continue ~~results~~as ofa ~~operations,~~going ~~cash flows, or disclosures~~concern.

~~In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011~~OFF-~~04,~~BALANCE ~~Fair~~SHEETS Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Under the amendments of this ASU will result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This ASU is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.ARRANGEMENTS

~~Off~~We do not have any significant off-~~Balance~~balance sheet ~~Sheet~~arrangements ~~Arrangements~~that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our balance sheet, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

~~The~~Additional ~~Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.~~Information

~~Item~~We 3file reports and other materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These ~~Quantitative~~documents may be inspected and ~~Qualitative~~copied ~~Disclosures~~at ~~About~~the ~~Market~~Securities ~~Risk~~and Exchange Commission, Judiciary Plaza, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, and Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also get copies of documents that the Company files with the Commission through the Commission’s Internet site at www.sec.gov .

~~Intentionally omitted pursuant~~ITEM ~~to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K~~3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

~~Item~~We 4.do ~~Controls~~not hold any derivative instruments and ~~Procedures~~do not engage in any hedging activities. We have no business activity as of the three month period ended May 31, 2012.

~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures . We~~ITEM conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act4. ~~The~~CONTROLS ~~term~~AND “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of November 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that the information required to be filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, presented, summarized and reported as specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We believe, however, that the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this Form10-Q fairly present the financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated.PROCEDURES

~~The~~Evaluation ~~identified~~of ~~material~~Disclosure ~~weaknesses~~Controls inand ~~our internal control over financial reporting relate to the following matters:~~Procedures.

• We ~~identified~~conducted aan ~~lack~~evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of ~~sufficient~~our ~~segregation~~management, including our Chief Executive Officer, who is also our Chief Financial Officer, of ~~duties~~the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” ~~particularly~~as defined in ~~cash~~Rules ~~disbursements.~~13a-15(e) ~~Specifically~~and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, ~~this~~means ~~material~~controls ~~weakness~~and isother ~~such~~procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the ~~design~~company ~~over~~in the ~~areas~~reports ofit ~~cash~~files ~~disbursements~~or ~~relies~~submits ~~primarily~~under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on ~~detective~~this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, who is also our Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that, as of May 31, 2012, our disclosure controls and ~~could~~procedures were not effective in ensuring that the information required to be ~~strengthened~~filed byor ~~adding~~submitted ~~preventative~~under ~~controls~~the Exchange Act is recorded, presented, summarized and reported as specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to ~~properly~~our management, ~~safeguard~~including ~~company~~our ~~assets~~Chief Executive Officer, also our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We believe, however, that the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this Form10-Q fairly present the financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated.

• Management has identified a lack of sufficient personnel in the accounting function due to the limited resources of the Company with appropriate skills, training and experience to perform the review of processes to ensure the complete and proper application of generally accepted accounting principles, particularly as it relates to taxes, valuation of share based payments, consolidation of entities, and equity transactions. Specifically, this material weakness lead to segregation of duties issues and resulted in audit adjustments to the annual consolidated financial statements and revisions to related disclosures, share based payments, consolidation of various entities, and other equity transactions.16

~~Our~~The ~~plan~~identified ~~to remediate those~~ material weaknesses ~~remaining~~in asour ofinternal ~~November~~control over ~~30,~~financial ~~2011~~reporting ~~will~~relate ~~depend~~to on the ~~outcome~~following ~~of our Bankruptcy filing.~~matters:

~~CHANGES~~• INWe ~~CONTROLS~~identified ~~AND~~a ~~PROCEDURES~~lack of sufficient segregation of duties, particularly in cash disbursements. Specifically, this material weakness is such that the design over the areas of cash disbursements relies primarily on detective controls and could be strengthened by adding preventative controls to properly safeguard company assets.

As• ~~required~~Management byhas ~~Rule~~identified ~~13-15(d)~~a lack of sufficient personnel in the ~~Exchange~~accounting ~~Act,~~function due to the ~~Company,~~limited ~~under~~resources of the ~~supervision~~Company with appropriate skills, training and ~~with~~experience to perform the ~~participation~~review of processes to ensure the ~~Company’s~~complete ~~management~~and proper application of generally accepted accounting principles, ~~including~~particularly ~~the~~as ~~Chief~~it ~~Executive~~relates ~~Officer~~to ~~and~~taxes, ~~Chief~~valuation ~~Financial~~of ~~Officer~~share ~~(principal~~based ~~financial~~payments, ~~officer)~~consolidation of entities, ~~also~~and ~~evaluated~~equity ~~whether~~transactions. ~~any~~Specifically, ~~changes~~this ~~have~~material ~~occurred~~weakness lead to ~~the~~segregation ~~Company’s~~of ~~internal~~duties ~~control~~issues ~~over~~and ~~financial~~resulted ~~reporting~~in ~~during~~audit adjustments to the ~~period~~annual ~~covered~~consolidated byfinancial ~~this~~statements ~~report~~and ~~that~~revisions ~~have~~to ~~materially~~related ~~affected~~disclosures, orshare ~~are~~based ~~reasonably~~payments, ~~likely~~consolidation toof ~~materially~~various ~~affect~~entities, ~~such~~and ~~control~~other equity transactions.

16Our plan to remediate those material weaknesses remaining as of May 31, 2012 will depend on the outcome of our Bankruptcy filing.

~~During~~PART ~~the~~II ~~second~~– ~~quarter,~~OTHER ~~Joseph Merhi and Edward Frumkes resigned directors. In September 2011, Mr. Martin W. Greenwald resigned as Chief Executive Officer and John Hackett joined as Chief Executive Officer.~~INFORMATION

OnITEM ~~October 13, 2011 John Hackett resigned as Chief Executive Officer and Garrett Cecchini joined as Chief Executive Officer~~1. ~~Garrett~~LEGAL Cecchini resigned as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer effective as of October 28, 2011 Effective October 31, 2011 the Company named Martin W. Greenwald its Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Greenwald is currently Chairman of the Board of the Company.PROCEEDINGS

~~PART~~The Company filed a voluntary petition on September ~~II - OTHER INFORMATION~~23, 2011 under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Riverside Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”).

~~Item~~There 1are no other material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of the Company’s property is subject as of the date of this report. ~~Legal~~Further, ~~Proceedings~~as of the date of this report, the Company is not aware of any legal proceedings against the Company, or its property contemplated by any governmental authority.

~~The~~ITEM ~~Company~~1A. ~~filed~~- aRISK voluntary petition on September 23, 2011 under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Riverside Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”).FACTORS

~~There~~In ~~are~~addition noto the other ~~material~~information ~~pending~~set ~~legal~~forth ~~proceedings~~in tothis ~~which~~ report, the ~~Company~~factors isdiscussed ain ~~party~~"Part orI of— ~~which~~Item ~~any~~1A of— ~~the~~Risk ~~Company’s~~Factors" ~~property~~in isour ~~subject~~Annual asReport ofon Form 10-K for the ~~date~~fiscal year ofended ~~this~~February ~~report.~~29, ~~Further~~2012, ascould ofmaterially ~~the~~affect ~~date~~our ofbusiness, ~~this~~financial ~~report~~condition, or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our subsequent SEC reports are not the ~~Company~~only isrisks facing us. There are additional risks and uncertainties not ~~aware~~currently ofknown ~~any~~to ~~legal~~us ~~proceedings~~or ~~against~~that ~~the~~we ~~Company~~currently deem to be immaterial that may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or ~~its~~operating ~~property~~results. ~~contemplated~~While bynot ~~any~~required ~~governmental~~for ~~authority.~~smaller reporting companies, we include the following risk factors in addition to the risk factors previously provided:

InFailure ~~addition~~ to ~~the~~execute ~~other~~on ~~information~~our ~~set~~turnaround ~~forth~~strategy incould ~~this~~adversely affect ~~report,~~our ~~you should carefully consider the factors discussed in “Part II, Item 6— Management~~Company’s ~~Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28~~liquidity, ~~2011 which was filed with the SEC on June 3, 2011 (the “Form 10K”). These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business,~~ financial condition, ~~results~~and ~~of operations, cash flows, projected~~ results ~~and future prospects. As~~ of ~~the date of this report, we believe that the previously discussed bankruptcy filing is a material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10K.~~operations

~~Item~~We 1Aare currently operating our business as debtors-in-possession in Chapter 11. ~~Risk~~The ~~Factors~~continuation of our Company as a going-concern is contingent upon, among other things, the Debtors’ ability (i) to comply with the terms and conditions of any DIP Credit Agreement; (ii) to develop a plan of reorganization and obtain confirmation of that plan under the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) to reduce debt and other liabilities through the bankruptcy process; (iv) to return to profitability through merger with a prospective business; (v) to subsequently generate sufficient cash flow from operations; and (vi) to obtain financing sources to meet our future obligations. The uncertainty regarding these matters raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

There has been one material change from risk factors as previously disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report Form on 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2011 and the Quarterly Report Form 10Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011.17

~~Chapter~~As ~~11 Bankruptcy . The Company filed~~ a ~~voluntary~~result ~~petition on September 23, 2011 (the “Petition Date”), for reorganization under Chapter 11~~ of the ~~United States Code (the “~~Bankruptcy ~~Code”)~~Filing, our ~~with~~historical ~~the~~financial ~~United~~information ~~States~~may ~~Bankruptcy~~not ~~Court~~be ~~for~~indicative ~~the Central District~~ of ~~California~~our ~~(the~~future ~~“Bankruptcy~~financial ~~Court”)~~performance. The Company is seeking debtor in Possession financing. There can be no assurance that such financing will be forthcoming, in which case the Company would need to amend its filing to a Chapter 7 filing for liquidation.

~~Item~~Our 2capital structure may be significantly altered through the Chapter 11 process. ~~Unregistered~~Under ~~Sales~~fresh-start reporting rules that may apply to the Debtors upon the effective date of ~~Equity~~a ~~Securities~~plan of reorganization, our assets and ~~Use~~liabilities would be adjusted to fair values and our accumulated deficit would be restated to zero. Accordingly, if fresh-start reporting rules apply, our financial condition and results of ~~Proceeds~~operations following our emergence from the bankruptcy would not be comparable to the financial condition and results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements. In connection with the Bankruptcy Filing and the development of a plan of reorganization, it is also possible that additional restructuring and related charges may be identified and recorded in future periods. Such charges could be material to our consolidated financial position and results of operations in any given period.

InOperating ~~June~~during ~~2011, one consultant made a cashless exercise of a stock option and 128,571 shares were issued. The securities were offered and sold in reliance on~~ the ~~exemption~~Bankruptcy ~~from~~Filing ~~registration~~may ~~under~~restrict ~~Section~~our ability ~~4(2)~~to ofpursue ~~the~~our ~~Act~~strategic and~~/or~~ ~~Rule~~operational ~~506 of Regulation D under the Act~~initiatives. ~~The offering was not conducted in connection with a public offering, and no public solicitation or advertisement was made or relied upon by the individual in connection with the offering.~~

InAs ~~June~~a ~~2011,~~result of the ~~Company~~Bankruptcy ~~issued 200~~Filing,~~000~~ transactions ~~shares~~outside the ordinary course of ~~common~~business ~~stock~~are subject to athe ~~supplier. In~~prior ~~return,~~approval of the ~~supplier~~Bankruptcy ~~agreed~~Court, towhich ~~give~~may ~~the~~limit our ~~Company~~ability to respond in a ~~discount~~timely onmanner ~~future~~to ~~purchases~~certain events or take advantage of ~~kiosks~~certain opportunities. ~~The~~Additionally, ~~Company~~the ~~recorded~~terms of ~~$100,000~~any inDIP ~~expenses~~Credit ~~related~~Agreement limit our ability to ~~this~~undertake ~~transaction~~certain business initiatives. These limitations include, among other things, our ability to:

In· ~~July~~incur ~~2011, the Company issued 2,121,750 shares related to an anti-dilution clause in $400,000 of previously reported debt converted to equity.~~indebtedness;

On· ~~August~~incur 2,or ~~2011,~~create ~~the Company issued 600,000 shares to Salzwedel Financial Services for services to be rendered. The Company recorded $90,000 in expense related to this transaction.~~liens;

In· ~~August~~dispose ~~2011, one creditor elected to convert $7,408~~ of ~~accounts payable into 74,085 shares of common stock of the Company.~~assets;

In· ~~the~~enter ~~quarter~~into ~~ending~~merger ~~August 31, 2011, the Company executed common stock~~ agreements with five accredited investors for $137,000 in cash. The accredited investors received 1,370,000 shares of common stock and one investor received 750,000 warrants to purchase an additional share of the Company at $0.10 within three years.;

17· prepay certain indebtedness and make other restricted payments;

~~Item~~· ~~3. Defaults~~enter ~~Upon~~into ~~Senior~~sale ~~Securities.~~and leaseback transactions; and

~~None~~· modify the terms of certain indebtedness and certain material contracts.

~~Item~~The ~~4. (Removed~~Bankruptcy Filing may have an adverse effect on our business and ~~Reserved).~~results of operations

~~None~~The requirements of the Bankruptcy Filing have consumed and will continue to consume a substantial portion of our corporate management’s time and attention and leave them with less time to devote to the procuring a new business. This diversion of attention may materially and adversely affect the development of our business strategy, and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations, particularly if the bankruptcy cases are protracted.

~~Item~~Furthermore, ~~5. Other~~we ~~Information~~have incurred and will continue to incur during the pendency of the Bankruptcy Filing substantial costs for professional fees and other expenses associated with the administration of the bankruptcy cases.

~~None~~If we are unable to implement a plan of reorganization, we may not be able to restructure our Company’s debts and continue as a going concern.

~~Item 6. Exhibits~~18

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

There can be no assurance that we will be able to confirm a plan of reorganization that will permit our Company to emerge from bankruptcy and continue operations. For example, we may be unable to secure sufficient exit financing to fund a confirmable Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or we may fall out of compliance with the covenants in any DIP Credit Agreement, which could result in the DIP Lenders’ exercise of remedies forcing us to liquidate unless we could refinance our obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will successfully reorganize.

~~SIGNATURES~~As a result of approval and implementation of a proposed plan, should such occur, certain changes in ownership of our Company could occur, which could adversely affect our ability to utilize our significant net operating loss carry-forwards upon our emergence from the Bankruptcy Filing.

~~Pursuant~~There toare certain tax attributes, such as net operating loss carry-forwards, that may be limited or lost altogether in the ~~requirements~~event of ~~the~~an ~~Securities~~ownership ~~Exchange~~change ~~Act~~as ofdefined ~~1934,~~under Section 382 of the ~~Registrant~~Internal ~~has~~Revenue ~~duly~~Code. ~~caused~~If ~~this~~a ~~report~~change of ownership were to beoccur ~~signed~~as ona ~~its~~result ~~behalf~~of bythe implementation of the proposed ~~undersigned~~plan, ~~thereunto~~upon ~~duly~~our ~~authorized~~emergence from the Bankruptcy Filing there could be significant valuation allowances placed on deferred tax assets.

		Public Media Works, Inc. (Registrant)
Date: January 19, 2012		/s/ Martin W. Greenwald
	By:	Martin W. Greenwald
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer

Trading in our securities during the pendency of the Bankruptcy Filing is highly speculative and poses substantial risks. Our common stock may be cancelled and holders of such common stock may not receive any distribution with respect to, or be able to recover any portion of, their investments.

18Although we cannot say for certain whether holders of our common stock will be eligible to receive any distributions on account of those holdings under a plan of reorganization or, if applicable, in a liquidation, it is exceedingly likely that these equity interests will be cancelled and extinguished in connection with confirmation of a plan of reorganization by the Bankruptcy Court and the holders thereof would not be entitled to receive, and would not receive or retain, any property or interest in property on account of such equity interests. In the event of cancellation of these equity interests, amounts invested by such holders in our outstanding equity securities will not be recoverable. As a result, our currently outstanding common stock would have no value. Trading prices for our common stock may bear little or no relationship to the actual recovery, if any, by the holders thereof in the Bankruptcy Filing. Accordingly, we urge extreme caution with respect to existing and future investments in our equity securities and any of our other securities.

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012 or JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. An “emerging growth company” can therefore delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.

We will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations that affect public companies, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects.

As a public company and particularly after we cease to be an “emerging growth company,” we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting and corporate governance requirements. These requirements include compliance with Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC.

The increased costs associated with operating as a public company will decrease our net income or increase our net loss, and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business. Additionally, if these requirements divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects.

However, for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”

If the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any August 30, we would cease to be an “emerging growth company” as of the following August 30, or if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three-year period, we would cease to be an “emerging growth company” immediately.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS SECURITIES

No common shares were issued during the three months ended May 31, 2012.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the quarter ended May 31, 2012.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

There is no information with respect to which information is not otherwise called for by this form.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant		PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC
Date: July 18, 2012		By: /s/ Martin W. Greenwald
		Martin W. Greenwald
		Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial Officer)

Filing Compare · PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS INC