As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 2011

Registration No. 333-_____________

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

FIRST SURGICAL PARTNERS INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	8060	51-0383940
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(Primary Standard Industrial	(IRS Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Classification Code Number)	Identification No.)

Anthony F. Rotondo, CEO and President

First Surgical Partners Inc.

411 First Street

Bellaire, Texas 77401

713-665-1111

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Anthony F. Rotondo, CEO and President

First Surgical Partners Inc.

411 First Street

Bellaire, Texas 77401

713-665-1111

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Please send a copy of all communications to:

Stephen M. Fleming, Esq.

Fleming PLLC

49 Front Street, Suite 206

Rockville Centre, New York 11570

Phone: (516) 833-5034

Fax: (516) 977-1209

Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of each class of securities to be registered		Amount to be registered				Proposed maximum offering price per unit (1)				Proposed maximum aggregate offering price (1)				Amount of registration fee
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share (2)			7,878,128			$	15.00			$	118,171,919			$	13,719.76

(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based on the average of the bid and asked price as of June 20, 2011 of $15.00.

(2) Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act, the shares of common stock offered hereby also include an indeterminate number of additional shares of common stock as may from time to time become issuable by reason of stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations or other similar transactions

The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the securities act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the commission, acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED AUGUST 19, 2011

7,878,128 Shares

FIRST SURGICAL PARTNERS INC.

Common Stock

OTC Bulletin Board trading symbol: FSPI

This prospectus relates to the public offering of an aggregate of 7,878,128 shares of common stock which may be sold from time to time by the selling shareholders named in this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling shareholders of their shares of common stock. We will pay the cost of the preparation of this prospectus, which is estimated at $90,000.

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol FSPI. On June 20, 2011, the last reported sales price per share of our common stock as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board was $15.00.

Investing in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase our common stock only if you can afford to lose your entire investment. See “Risk Factors,” which begins on page 8.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined whether this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling shareholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

The selling shareholders have not engaged any underwriter in connection with the sale of their shares of common stock. The selling shareholders may sell their shares of common stock in the public market based on the market price at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. The selling shareholders may also sell their shares in transaction that are not in the public market in the manner set forth under “Plan of Distribution.”

The date of this Prospectus is _______, 2011

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide you with information concerning us, except for the information contained in this prospectus. The information contained in this prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date on the front cover page of this prospectus, regardless when the time of delivery of this prospectus or the sale of any common stock. This prospectus is not an offer to sell, nor is it a solicitation of an offer to buy, our common stock in any jurisdiction in which the offer or sale is not permitted.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Prospectus Summary		3
Risk Factors		7
Forward-Looking Statements		15
Use of Proceeds		15
Selling Stockholders		16
Plan of Distribution		21
Market for Common Stock and Shareholder Matters		23
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25
Business		37
Management		49
Executive Compensation		52
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		54
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		55
Description of Securities		56
Change of Independent Accounting Firm		57
Legal Matters		58
How to Get More Information		58
Financial Statements		F-1

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary does not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read the entire prospectus, including the Risk Factors and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus before making an investment decision.

Summary

Through our wholly owned subsidiary, First Surgical Texas, Inc. (“First Surgical Texas”), a Nevada corporation, we operate two ambulatory surgery centers (“ASC”) and a general acute care hospital in the Houston area. First Surgical Texas partners with top surgeons in the local medical community to perform non life-threatening surgeries at these locations. A portion of the surgeons that utilize our facilities also own securities in our company (“affiliated surgeons”). However, there is no restriction mandating that only affiliated surgeons utilize our facilities. As such, non-affiliated surgeons continue to utilize our facilities for the reasons described below which are focused on providing our surgeons with the ability to operate in a manner whereby their time and profit is maximized. All surgeons bill for their professional component separately and none of that revenue is reported by First Surgical. The main source of revenue for First Surgical is the facility fee component which is billed and collected under each facility upon completion of surgery.

For the year ended December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, with a total count of 90 surgeons utilizing our facilities, 33.7% represent affiliated surgeons and 66.3% represent non-affiliated surgeons. Affiliated surgeons generated 57.8% and 62.2% of First Surgical’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The remaining balance of the revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, or 42.2% and 37.8%, respecively, was generated by non-affiliated surgeons. We expect the mix of non-affiliated surgeons and affiliated surgeons and the percentage of revenue generated by each of these groups to continue in the near future.

As described below, we intend to further develop our business and generate additional revenue:

·	through the expansion of our non-affiliated surgeon base by introducing new technical innovations;

·	the expansion of our affiliated surgeon base through the adoption of a physician stock purchase plan if feasible; and

·	the startup and development of surgical centers and the acquisition of hospitals in competitive markets.

We plan on expanding the revenue generated by non-affiliated surgeons by introducing new technical innovations in spine, bariatrics, orthopedics and reconstructive surgery, which we believe will attract non-affiliated surgeons.

In order to expand the revenue generated by affiliated surgeons, we are currently evaluating the adoption of a physician stock purchase plan, which will allow physicians to purchase equity in our company. We have engaged various experts to advise on the legality of such plan in light of the Stark and Anti-kickback regulations. As a result, until such analysis is finalized, we are uncertain if we will be able to adopt such plan in the near future or ever.

In addition, the startup and development of surgical centers and the acquisition of hospitals in competitive markets we believe will allow for our company’s growth and expansion of our business through the addition of non-affiliated surgeons and affiliated surgeons.

The risks associated with our plan to grow our business include surgeons’ practices stagnating or even slowing down and competition for surgeons to join other facilities in the market, which would limit our facility fees. Our inability to acquire existing facilities for business reasons or our inability to start or acquire new facilities as a result of various government regulations will also limit our plan of operations. Further, the lack of interest in new and innovative technology utilized by our facilities may have a negative impact on our operations including the facility fees generated by both the affiliated surgeons and non-affiliated surgeons. Finally, if we are unable to adopt a physician stock purchase plan, we will be unable to expand our pool of affiliated surgeons. As affiliated surgeons have historically generated a significant portion of our revenue, any future revenue growth will be substantially limited if we do not implement such plan.

Organization

We are a Delaware corporation organized in October 2008. We are the sole shareholder of First Surgical Texas. First Surgical Texas is the sole limited partner of First Street Hospital, L.P. (“FSH”), First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. (“FSW”) and First Street Surgical Center, L.P. (“FSSC”). First Surgical Partners Texas LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of First Surgical Texas, serves as the general partner for FSH, FSW and FSSC.

Contribution Acquisition

On November 4, 2010, we entered into a Contribution Agreement with the shareholders of First Surgical Texas, each of which are accredited investors (“First Surgical Texas Shareholders”), pursuant to which the First Surgical Texas Shareholders agreed to contribute 100% of the outstanding securities of First Surgical Texas in exchange for 39,964,346 shares of our common stock (the “First Surgical Texas Contribution”). The First Surgical Texas Contribution closed on December 31, 2010. Considering that, following the contribution, the First Surgical Texas Shareholders control the majority of our outstanding common stock and we effectively succeeded our otherwise minimal operations to those that are theirs, First Surgical Texas is considered the accounting acquirer in this reverse-merger transaction. A reverse-merger transaction is considered, and accounted for as, a capital transaction in substance; it is equivalent to the issuance of First Surgical Texas securities for our net monetary assets, which are deminimus, accompanied by a recapitalization. Accordingly, we have not recognized any goodwill or other intangible assets in connection with this transaction. We are the surviving and continuing entity and the historical financials following the reverse merger transaction will be those of First Surgical Texas. We were a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) immediately prior to our acquisition of First Surgical Texas pursuant to the terms of the Contribution Agreement. As a result of such acquisition, our operations our now focused on the ownership and operation of two ASCs and a general acute care hospital. Consequently, we believe that acquisition has caused us to cease to be a shell company as we no longer have nominal operations.

Other Pertinent Information

References to “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words refer to the First Surgical Partners Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. Our corporate headquarters are located at First Surgical Partners Inc., 411 First Street, Bellaire, Texas 77401. Our telephone number is 713-665-1111. Our website is http://www.firstsurgical.com. Information on our website or any other website does not constitute a part of this prospectus.

The Offering

Common Stock Offered:		The selling shareholders are offering a total of 7,878,128 shares of common stock, which are presently outstanding.

Outstanding Shares of Common Stock:		40,650,006 shares

Use of Proceeds:		We will receive no proceeds from the sale of any shares by the selling shareholders.

Risk Factors:		The purchase of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully review and consider "Risk Factors" beginning on page 7.

Summary Financial Information

(in thousands, except per share information)

The following information at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended and June 30, 2011 and the six months then ended has been derived from our consolidated financial statements which appear elsewhere in this prospectus.

Statement of Operations Information:

				Year Ended December 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			2010			2009
Net Revenue	$	24,773		$	46,165		$	44,555
Operating Expenses		21,595			35,115			33,448
Other Income and Expenses		(613	)		(864	)		(1,022	)
Net Income		1,646			5,708			10,084

Balance Sheet Information:

				December 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			2010			2009
Total Assets	$	43,501		$	39,863		$	30,092
Total Current Liabilities		17,245			14,968			10,438
Total Long Term Liabilities		17,059			17,056			9,187
Retained Earnings/(Accumulated Deficit)		(2,236	)		(3,881	)		7,587
Total Shareholders’ Equity		9,198			7,838			10,466

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before making an investment decision, and you should only consider an investment in our common stock if you can afford to sustain the loss of your entire investment. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Competition for staffing, shortages of qualified personnel, and union activity may increase our labor costs and reduce profitability.

Our operations are dependent on the efforts, abilities, and experience of our management and medical support personnel, such as, nurses and other healthcare professionals. We compete with other healthcare providers in recruiting and retaining qualified management and support personnel responsible for the daily operations of each of our hospitals. In some markets, the lack of availability of nurses and other medical support personnel has become a significant operating issue to healthcare providers. This shortage may require us to continue to enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain qualified personnel or to hire more expensive temporary personnel. We also depend on the available labor pool of semi-skilled and unskilled employees in each of the markets in which we operate.

If our labor costs increase, we may not be able to raise rates to offset these increased costs. Union activity is another factor that contributes to increased labor costs. Various federal legislative proposals, including the proposed Employee Free Choice Act or “card check” bill, would likely result in increased union activity in general. We cannot, however, predict the form or effect of final legislation, if any, that might promote union activity. Our failure to recruit and retain qualified management, nurses and other medical support personnel, or to control our labor costs, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

If we fail to comply with the extensive laws and government regulations applicable to healthcare providers, we could suffer penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations.

As a healthcare provider, we are required to comply with extensive and complex laws and regulations at the federal, state, and local government levels. These laws and regulations relate to, among other things:

■

licensure, certification, and accreditation;

■

coding and billing for services;

■

relationships with physicians and other referral sources, including physician self-referral and anti-kickback laws;

■

quality of medical care;

■

use and maintenance of medical supplies and equipment;

■

maintenance and security of medical records;

■

acquisition and dispensing of pharmaceuticals and controlled substances; and

■

disposal of medical and hazardous waste.

In the future, changes in these laws and regulations could subject our current or past practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality or could require us to make changes in our investment structure, hospitals, equipment, personnel, services, capital expenditure programs, operating procedures, or contractual arrangements.

Although we have invested substantial time, effort, and expense in implementing internal controls and procedures designed to ensure regulatory compliance, if we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations we could be subjected to liabilities, including (1) criminal penalties, (2) civil penalties, including monetary penalties and the loss of our licenses to operate one or more of our hospitals, and (3) exclusion or suspension of one or more of our hospitals from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal and state healthcare programs. Substantial damages and other remedies assessed against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Future acquisitions may use significant resources, may be unsuccessful and could expose us to unforeseen liabilities.

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue acquisitions of existing surgical facilities. Acquisitions may involve significant cash expenditures, potential debt incurrence and operational losses, dilutive issuances of equity securities and expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:

■

the difficulty and expense of integrating acquired personnel into our business;

■

the diversion of management’s time from existing operations;

■

the potential loss of key employees of acquired companies;

■

the difficulty of assignment and/or procurement of managed care contractual arrangements; and

■

the assumption of the liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies, including liabilities for failure to comply with healthcare regulations.

We may not be successful in obtaining financing for acquisitions at a reasonable cost, or such financing may contain restrictive covenants that limit our operating flexibility. We also may be unable to surgical facilities, or successfully operate such facilities, following their acquisition.

We depend on payments from third party payors, including government healthcare programs. If these payments are reduced, our revenue will decrease.

We are dependent upon private and governmental third party sources of payment for the services provided to patients in our surgery centers and surgical hospital. The amount of payment a surgical facility receives for its services may be adversely affected by market and cost factors as well as other factors over which we have no control, including Medicare and Medicaid regulations and the cost containment and utilization decisions of third party payors.

If we are unable to acquire and develop additional surgical facilities on favorable terms, are not successful in integrating operations of acquired surgical facilities, or are unable to manage growth, we may be unable to execute our acquisition and development strategy, which could limit our future growth.

Our strategy is to increase our revenues and earnings by acquiring and developing additional surgical facilities. Our efforts to execute our acquisition and development strategy may be affected by our ability to identify suitable candidates and negotiate and close acquisition and development transactions. We are currently evaluating potential acquisitions and development projects and expect to continue to evaluate acquisitions and development projects in the foreseeable future. The surgical facilities we develop typically incur losses in their early months of operation (more so in the case of surgical hospitals) and, until their case loads grow, they generally experience lower total revenues and operating margins than established surgical facilities, and we expect this trend to continue. We may not be successful in acquiring surgical facilities, developing surgical facilities or achieving satisfactory operating results at acquired or newly developed facilities. Further, the companies or assets we acquire in the future may not ultimately produce returns that justify our related investment. If we are not able to execute our acquisition and development strategy, our ability to increase revenues and earnings through future growth would be impaired.

If we are not successful in integrating newly acquired surgical facilities, we may not realize the potential benefits of such acquisitions. Likewise, if we are not able to integrate acquired facilities’ operations and personnel with ours in a timely and efficient manner, then the potential benefits of the transaction may not be realized. Further, any delays or unexpected costs incurred in connection with integration could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow. In particular, if we experience the loss of key personnel or if the effort devoted to the integration of acquired facilities diverts significant management attention or other resources from other operational activities, our operations could be impaired.

If we incur material liabilities as a result of acquiring surgical facilities, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Although we conduct extensive due diligence prior to the acquisition of surgical facilities and seek indemnification from prospective sellers covering unknown or contingent liabilities, we may acquire surgical facilities that have material liabilities for failure to comply with healthcare laws and regulations or other past activities. Although we maintain professional and general liability insurance, we do not currently maintain insurance specifically covering any unknown or contingent liabilities that may have occurred prior to the acquisition of surgical facilities. If we incur these liabilities and are not indemnified or insured for them, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

We depend on our relationships with the physicians who use our facilities. Our ability to provide medical services at our facilities would be impaired and our revenues reduced if we are not able to maintain these relationships.

Our business depends upon the efforts and success of the physicians who provide medical and surgical services at our facilities and the strength of our relationships with these physicians. Our revenues would be reduced if we lost our relationship with one or more key physicians or group of physicians or such physicians or groups reduce their use of our facilities. In addition, any failure of these physicians to maintain the quality of medical care provided, or to otherwise adhere to professional guidelines at our surgical facilities, or any damage to the reputation of a key physician or group of physicians, could damage our reputation, subject us to liability and significantly reduce our revenues.

Our surgical facilities face competition for patients from other health care providers.

The health care business is highly competitive, and competition among hospitals and other health care providers for patients has intensified in recent years. Generally, other facilities in the local communities served by our facilities provide services similar to those offered by our surgery centers and surgical hospital. In addition, the number of freestanding surgical hospitals and surgery centers in Texas has increased significantly. As a result, our facilities operate in a highly competitive environment. Some of the hospitals that compete with our facilities are owned by governmental agencies or not-for-profit corporations supported by endowments, charitable contributions and/or tax revenues and can finance capital expenditures and operations on a tax-exempt basis. Our surgery centers and surgical hospital are facing increasing competition from unaffiliated physician-owned surgery centers and surgical hospitals for market share in high margin services and for quality physicians and personnel. If our competitors are better able to attract patients, recruit physicians, expand services or obtain favorable managed care contracts at their facilities than our surgery centers and surgical hospital, we may experience an overall decline in patient volume.

Current economic conditions may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The current economic conditions will likely have an impact on our business. We regularly monitor quantitative as well as qualitative measures to identify changes in our business in order to react accordingly. Although we have not seen any significant trends as it relates to our case volume through December 2010, there can be no assurance that we will not be negatively impacted. The most likely impact on us will be lower case volumes as elective procedures may be deferred or cancelled, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our revenues may be reduced by changes in payment methods or rates under the Medicare or Medicaid programs.

The Department of Health and Human Services and the states in which we perform surgical procedures for Medicaid patients may revise the Medicare and Medicaid payment methods or rates in the future. Any such changes could have a negative impact on the reimbursements we receive for our surgical services from the Medicare program and the state Medicaid programs. Notably, as part of a Congressional mandate to revise the Medicare payment system for procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services published proposed rules revising the payment system for ambulatory surgery centers in August 2006. The final rule expanded the number of procedures that are covered in ambulatory surgery centers and, among other things, set the payment rate at approximately 65% of the payment for the same procedure when performed in a hospital outpatient department. The final rule is being phased in over a four-year period which began in 2008.

Efforts to regulate the construction, acquisition or expansion of healthcare facilities could prevent us from acquiring additional surgical facilities, renovating our existing facilities or expanding the breadth of services we offer.

In several states, you must obtain prior approval for the construction, acquisition or expansion of healthcare facilities or expansion of the services they offer. When considering whether to approve such projects, these states take into account the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. Although we have not previously been required to obtain a certificate in the State of Texas, we may not be able to obtain the certificates we need or other required approvals for additional or expanded facilities or services in the future. In addition, at the time we acquire a facility, we may agree to replace or expand the acquired facility. Further, over the last several years, changes in federal regulations regarding hospitals, specifically physician-owned hospitals, have created additional challenges from an operation perspective. Many of these changes have resulted in limitations, including moratoriums on physician-owned start-up hospitals. Although the moratorium on physician-owned start-up hospitals may prevent us from developing start up hospitals, we will be able to acquire existing hospitals as well as develop surgical centers. If we are unable to obtain the required approvals, or if the moratorium is not lifted, we may not be able to acquire additional surgery centers or surgical hospitals, expand the healthcare services provided at these facilities, replace or expand acquired facilities or develop new start up hospitals, each of which could have a negative impact on our potential growth prospects, if any.

Failure to comply with federal and state statutes and regulations relating to patient privacy and electronic data security could negatively impact our financial results.

There are currently numerous federal and state statutes and regulations that address patient privacy concerns and federal standards that address the maintenance of the security of electronically maintained or transmitted electronic health information and the format of transmission of such information in common health care financing information exchanges. These provisions are intended to enhance patient privacy and the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare claims and payment transactions. In particular, the Administrative Simplification Provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 required us to implement new systems and to adopt business procedures for transmitting health care information and for protecting the privacy and security of individually identifiable information.

We believe that we are in material compliance with existing state and federal regulations relating to patient privacy, security and with respect to the format for electronic health care transactions. However, if we fail to comply with the federal privacy, security and transactions and code sets regulations, we could incur significant civil and criminal penalties. Failure to comply with state laws related to privacy could, in some cases, also result in civil fines and criminal penalties.

If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations.

We are subject to many laws and regulations at the federal, state and local government levels in the jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws and regulations require that our healthcare facilities meet various licensing, certification and other requirements, including those relating to:

■

physician ownership;

■

the adequacy of medical care, equipment, personnel, operating policies and procedures;

■

building codes;

■

licensure, certification and accreditation;

■

billing for services;

■

handling of medication;

■

maintenance and protection of records; and

■

environmental protection

We believe that we are in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations. However, if we fail or have failed to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer civil or criminal penalties, including the loss of our licenses to operate and our ability to participate in Medicare, Medicaid and other government sponsored healthcare programs. A number of initiatives have been proposed during the past several years to reform various aspects of the healthcare system. In the future, different interpretations or enforcement of existing or new laws and regulations could subject our current practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality, or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services, capital expenditure programs and operating expenses. Current or future legislative initiatives or government regulation may have a material adverse effect on our operations or reduce the demand for our services.

In pursuing our growth strategy, we may expand our presence into new geographic markets. In entering a new geographic market, we will be required to comply with laws and regulations of jurisdictions that may differ from those applicable to our current operations. If we are unable to comply with these legal requirements in a cost-effective manner, we may be unable to enter new geographic markets.

If a federal or state agency asserts a different position or enacts new laws or regulations regarding illegal remuneration under the Medicare or Medicaid programs, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties, experience a significant reduction in our revenues or be excluded from participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

The federal anti-kickback statute prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for referrals for items or services payable by Medicare, Medicaid, or any other federally funded healthcare program. Additionally, the anti-kickback statute prohibits any form of remuneration in return for purchasing, leasing or ordering, or arranging for or recommending the purchasing, leasing or ordering of items or services payable by Medicare, Medicaid or any other federally funded healthcare program. The anti-kickback statute is very broad in scope and many of its provisions have not been uniformly or definitively interpreted by existing case law or regulations. Moreover, several federal courts have held that the anti-kickback statute can be violated if only one purpose (not necessarily the primary purpose) of a transaction is to induce or reward a referral of business, notwithstanding other legitimate purposes. Violations of the anti-kickback statute may result in substantial civil or criminal penalties, including up to five years imprisonment and criminal fines of up to $25,000 and civil penalties of up to $50,000 for each violation, plus three times the remuneration involved or the amount claimed and exclusion from participation in all federally funded healthcare programs. An exclusion, if applied to our surgery centers or surgical hospitals, could result in significant reductions in our revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Although we believe that our business arrangements do not violate the anti-kickback statute, a government agency or a private party may assert a contrary position. Additionally, new domestic federal or state laws may be enacted that would cause our relationships with the physician investors to become illegal or result in the imposition of penalties against us or our facilities. If any of our business arrangements with physician investors were deemed to violate the anti-kickback statute or similar laws, or if new domestic federal or state laws were enacted rendering these arrangements illegal, our business could be adversely affected.

Also, most of the states in which we operate have adopted anti-kickback laws, many of which apply more broadly to all third-party payors, not just to federal or state healthcare programs. Many of the state laws do not have regulatory safe harbors comparable to the federal provisions and have only rarely been interpreted by the courts or other governmental agencies. We believe that our business arrangements do not violate these state laws. Nonetheless, if our arrangements were found to violate any of these anti-kickback laws, we could be subject to significant civil and criminal penalties that could adversely affect our business.

If physician self-referral laws are interpreted differently or if other legislative restrictions are issued, we could incur significant sanctions and loss of reimbursement revenues.

The U.S. federal physician self-referral law, commonly referred to as the Stark law, prohibits a physician from making a referral for a “designated health service” to an entity to furnish an item or service payable under Medicare if the physician or a member of the physician’s immediate family has a financial relationship with the entity such as an ownership interest or compensation arrangement, unless an exception applies. The list of designated health services under the Stark law does not include ambulatory surgery services as such. However, some of the designated health services are among the types of services furnished by our facilities.

The Department of Health and Human Services, acting through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has promulgated regulations implementing the Stark law. These regulations exclude health services provided by an ambulatory surgery center from the definition of “designated health services” if the services are included in the facility’s composite Medicare payment rate. Therefore, the Stark law’s self-referral prohibition generally does not apply to health services provided by a surgery center. However, if the surgery center is separately billing Medicare for designated health services that are not covered under the surgery center’s composite Medicare payment rate, or if either the surgery center or an affiliated physician is performing (and billing Medicare) for procedures that involve designated health services that Medicare has not designated as an ambulatory surgery center service, the Stark law’s self-referral prohibition would apply and such services could implicate the Stark law. We believe that our operations do not violate the Stark Law, as currently interpreted.

Companies within the healthcare industry continue to be the subject of federal and state audits and investigations, which increases the risk that we may become subject to investigations in the future.

Both federal and state government agencies, as well as private payors, have heightened and coordinated audits and administrative, civil and criminal enforcement efforts as part of numerous ongoing investigations of healthcare organizations. These investigations relate to a wide variety of topics, including the following:

■

cost reporting and billing practices;

■

quality of care;

■

financial reporting;

■

financial relationships with referral sources; and

■

medical necessity of services provided.

In addition, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice have, from time to time, undertaken national enforcement initiatives that focus on specific billing practices or other suspected areas of abuse. Moreover, another trend impacting healthcare providers is the increased use of the federal False Claims Act, particularly by individuals who bring actions under that law. Such “qui tam” or “whistleblower” actions allow private individuals to bring actions on behalf of the government alleging that a healthcare provider has defrauded the federal government. If the government intervenes and prevails in the action, the defendant may be required to pay three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus mandatory civil monetary penalties of between $5,500 and $11,000 for each false claim submitted to the government. As part of the resolution of a qui tam case, the party filing the initial complaint may share in a portion of any settlement or judgment. If the government does not intervene in the action, the qui tam plaintiff may pursue the action independently. Additionally, some states have adopted similar whistleblower and false claims provisions. Although companies in the healthcare industry have been, and may continue to be, subject to qui tam actions, we are unable to predict the impact of such actions on our business, financial position or results of operations.

If we become subject to significant legal actions, we could be subject to substantial uninsured liabilities.

In recent years, physicians, surgery centers, hospitals and other healthcare providers have become subject to an increasing number of legal actions alleging malpractice or related legal theories. Many of these actions involve large monetary claims and significant defense costs. We do not employ any of the physicians who conduct surgical procedures at our facilities and the governing documents of each of our facilities require physicians who conduct surgical procedures at our facilities to maintain stated amounts of insurance. Additionally, to protect us from the cost of these claims, we maintain professional malpractice liability insurance and general liability insurance coverage in amounts and with deductibles that we believe to be appropriate for our operations. If we become subject to claims, however, our insurance coverage may not cover all claims against us or continue to be available at adequate levels of insurance. If one or more successful claims against us were not covered by or exceeded the coverage of our insurance, we could be adversely affected.

If we are unable to effectively compete for physicians, strategic relationships, acquisitions and managed care contracts, our business could be adversely affected.

The healthcare business is highly competitive. We compete with other healthcare providers, primarily other surgery centers and hospitals, in recruiting physicians and contracting with managed care payors. There are major unaffiliated hospitals in each market in which we operate. These hospitals have established relationships with physicians and payors. In addition, other companies either are currently in the same or similar business of developing, acquiring and operating surgery centers and surgical hospitals or may decide to enter our business. Many of these companies have greater financial, research, marketing and staff resources than we do. We may also compete with some of these companies for entry into strategic relationships with not-for-profit healthcare systems and healthcare professionals. If we are unable to compete effectively with any of these entities, we may be unable to implement our business strategies successfully and our business could be adversely affected.

Because our senior management has been key to our growth and success, we may be adversely affected if we lose any member of our senior management.

We are highly dependent on our senior management, including Dr. Jacob Varon, who is our chairman, and Mr. Anthony Rotondo, who is our chief executive officer and president. We presently do not have employment agreements with Dr. Varon or Mr. Rotondo and we do not maintain “key man” life insurance policies on any of our officers. Because our senior management has contributed greatly to our growth since inception, the loss of key management personnel or our inability to attract, retain and motivate sufficient numbers of qualified management or other personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.

A small number of existing shareholders own a significant amount of our Common Stock, which could limit your ability to influence the outcome of any shareholder vote.

Our executive officers, directors and shareholders holding in excess of 5% of our issued and outstanding shares, beneficially own over 43% of our Common Stock. Under our Articles of Incorporation and Delaware law, the vote of a majority of the shares outstanding is generally required to approve most shareholder action. As a result, these individuals will be able to significantly influence the outcome of shareholder votes for the foreseeable future, including votes concerning the election of directors, amendments to our Articles of Incorporation or proposed mergers or other significant corporate transactions.

Our stock price and trading volume may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for our stockholders.

The equity trading markets may experience periods of volatility, which could result in highly variable and unpredictable pricing of equity securities. The market price of our common stock could change in ways that may or may not be related to our business, our industry or our operating performance and financial condition. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. We have experienced significant volatility in the price of our stock over the past few years. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. In addition, the stock markets in general can experience considerable price and volume fluctuations.

We have not voluntary implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which; shareholders may have more limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

Recent Federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets. Some of these measures have been adopted in response to legal requirements. Others have been adopted by companies in response to the requirements of national securities exchanges, such as the NYSE or the NASDAQ Stock Market, on which their securities are listed. Among the corporate governance measures that are required under the rules of national securities exchanges are those that address board of directors' independence, audit committee oversight, and the adoption of a code of ethics. While we intend to adopt certain corporate governance measures such as a code of ethics and establish an Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Compensation Committee of our board of directors, we presently do not have any independent directors. We intend to expand our board membership in future periods to include independent directors. It is possible that if we were to have independent directors on our board, stockholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. For example, in the absence of Audit, Nominating and Compensation Committees comprised of at least a majority of independent directors, decisions concerning matters such as compensation packages to our senior officers and recommendations for director nominees may be made by our existing Board of Directors who have an interest in the outcome of the matters being decided. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of both corporate governance measures and independent directors in formulating their investment decisions.

If a public market for our common stock develops, trading may be limited under the SEC’s penny stock regulations, which may adversely affect the liquidity of our common stock.

The trading price of our common stock may be less than $5.00 per share and, as a result, our common stock would be considered a "penny stock," and trading in our common stock would be subject to the requirements of Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act. Under this rule, broker/dealers who recommend low-priced securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must satisfy special sales practice requirements. Generally, the broker/dealer must make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written consent prior to the transaction.

SEC regulations also require additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a "penny stock," including the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and its associated risks. These requirements severely limit the liquidity of securities in the secondary market because few broker or dealers are likely to undertake these compliance activities. In addition to the applicability of the penny stock rules, other risks associated with trading in penny stocks could also be price fluctuations and the lack of a liquid market. An active and liquid market in our common stock may never develop due to these factors.

The potential sale of 7,878,128 shares pursuant to this prospectus may have a depressive effect on the price and market for our common stock.

The potential sale of 7,878,128 shares of common stock pursuant to this prospectus may have a depressive effect on our stock price and make it more difficult for us to raise any significant funds in the equity market if our business requires additional funding.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this prospectus may be “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that express our intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies, predictions or any other statements relating to our future activities or other future events or conditions. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business based, in part, on assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and are likely to, differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including those described above and those risks discussed from time to time in this prospectus, including the risks described under “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this prospectus and in our Form 8-K Current Report (Super 8K). In addition, such statements could be affected by risks and uncertainties related to the healthcare industry as a whole, changes in regulation on the state or federal level, delays in payments from third party payors, our ability to raise any financing which we may require for our operations, our ability to make acquisitions and successfully integrate those acquisitions with our business, as well as general industry and market conditions and growth rates, and general economic conditions. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this prospectus.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling shareholders of their common stock.

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

The table below sets forth information concerning the resale of the shares of common stock by the selling stockholders. We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the common stock by the selling stockholders.

The following table also sets forth the name of each person who is offering the resale of shares of common stock by this prospectus, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person, the number of shares of common stock that may be sold in this offering and the number of shares of common stock each person will own after the offering, assuming they sell all of the shares offered.

Name of Selling Stockholder	Common Shares owned by the selling Stockholder (1)		Total Shares Registered Pursuant to this Offering		% of Total Issued and Outstanding Shares before Offering			Number of Shares Owned by Selling Stockholder After Offering and Percent of Total Issued and Outstanding (2)
								# of Shares		% of Class
James R. Anderson		67,000		67,000		*			0		*

Robert T. Benz		152,500		152,500		*			0		*

Timothy Betts		333,333		333,333		*			0		*

David Blumfield		599,331		89,900		1.47	%		509,431		1.25	%

Ronald F. Bratek		4,000		4,000		*			0		*

Denise Brathwaite		10,000		10,000		*			0		*

Taylor Brown		78,480		11,772		*			68,708		*

Ron Buczek		1,594,692		239,204		3.92	%		1,355,488		3.33	%

Michael Ciaravino		756,291		113,444		1.86	%		642,847		1.58	%

SJS 2006 Gift Trust (3)		803,271		120,491		1.98	%		682,780		1.68	%

Geoffrey Cragg		2,000		2,000		*			0		*

Thomas W. Davis Jr.		1,000		1,000		*			0		*

James C. Dees		1,000		1,000		*			0		*

Tannie G. Dees		9,000		9,000		*			0		*

Robert E. and Rosalie T. Dettle Living Trust U/A 02/29/80 (4)		2,500		2,500		*			0		*

Ephraim H. Dockstader	10,600	10,600	*		0	*

Mark Elg	2,000	2,000	*		0	*

ELG Family Trust (5)	27,000	27,000	*		0	*

Leon Etter	199,191	29,879	*		169,312	*

FYM Partners LLP (6)	706,320	105,948	1.74	%	600,372	1.48	%

Robert T. Firebaugh	4,000	4,000	*		0	*

Stephen M. Fleming	170,000	170,000	*		0	*

Nick Fredrick	4,000	4,000	*		0	*

Abdel Fustock	618,951	92,843	1.52	%	526,108	1.29	%

Dorthea Hardin	40,000	40,000	*		0	*

Sean Harrison	63,334	63,334	*		0	*

Paul Heisey Trust (6A)	2,000	2,000	*		0	*

Paul A. Hill	3,000	3,000	*		0	*

Eric Horton	30,333	30,333	*		0	*

Richard Hung	78,480	11,772	*		66,708	*

David Jenson	1,014,804	152,221	2.50	%	869,583	2.12	%

JM Assets LP (7)	103,000	103,000	*		0	*

Joel Kaplan	2,700	2,700	*		0	*

Paul A Kaye Family Trust (8)	1,000	1,000	*		0	*

Lawrence M. Kellner	3,333	3,333	*		0	*

Klar Family Trust U/A/D 11/21/2006 (9)	17,000	17,000	*		0	*

Paul Kobza	1,594,692	239,204	3.92	%	1,355,488	3.33	%

Karre Kolstad KBK 2006 Gift Trust (10)	803,271	120,491	1.98	%	682,780	1.68	%

Audrey M. Krauss	4,000	4,000	*		0	*

Kreuzer Family Partnership Ltd.	803,271	120,491	1.98	%	682,780	1.68	%

Ajay Kwatra	289,944	43,492	*		246,452	*

Marc Labbe	557,100	83,565	1.37	%	473,535	1.16	%

Ken Lee	803,271	120,491	1.98	%	682,780	1.68	%

David Lo	11,112	11,112	*		0	*

Jerry I. Maine	2,000	2,000	*		0	*

Chandler Mann	434,916	65,237	1.07	%	369,279	*

Patrick C. McCulloch 2007 Gift Trust (11)	478,620	71,793	1.18	%	406,827	1.00	%

Jeffrey McKellips	20,000	20,000	*		0	*

Meador Trust (12)	82,000	82,000	*		0	*

Robert Mehl	80,000	80,000	*		0	*

Jose Luis Mendez	40,000	40,000	*		0	*

Phil Mitchell	10,000	10,000	*		0	*

Kevin Mohan	40,000	40,000	*		0	*

William E. Morgan	2,500	2,500	*		0	*

Ron Moses	78,480	11,772	*		66,708	*

Jerry Neugebauer	40,000	40,000	*		0	*

Bonaventure Ngu	289,944	43,492	*		246,452	*

Richard Nixon	920,991	138,149	2.27	%	782,842	1.93	%

Nobis Capital Advisors, Inc. (13)	1,615,048	1,615,048	3.97	%	0	*

Eric Pack	869,832	130,475	2.14	%	739,357	1.82	%

Eric Powitzky	78,480	11,772	*		66,708	*

Eric Price	724,860	108,729	1.78	%	616,131	1.52	%

Jose Reyes	144,972	21,746	*		123,226	*

Roeth Living Trust DTD 4/25/1979 (14)	30,000	30,000	*		0	*

Franklin Rose	1,674,291	251,144	4.12	%	1,423,147	3.50	%

Anthony F. Rotondo Irrevocable Trust dated July 23, 2010 (15)	1,000,000	629,373	2.46	%	370,627	*

John A. Rowell	23,000	23,000	*		0	*

RTK Partners (16)	1,000	1,000	*		0	*

Joel Shapiro	5,000	5,000	*		0	*

Limabr Ltd.(16A)	557,100	83,565	1.37	%	473,535	1.16	%

A B Southall III	120,000	120,000	*		0	*

Barbara J. Stubblefield	6,000	6,000	*		0	*

David E. Tomaszek Irrevocable Trust dated July 20, 2010 (17)	390,000	390,000	*		0	*

Leonard Trahan	434,916	65,237	1.07	%	369,679	*

Dennis Trainor	40,000	40,000	*		0	*

KV 2006 Gift Trust (18)	803,271	120,491	1.98	%	682,780	1.68	%

The Jacob Varon Irrevocable Trust Dated May 18, 2011 (19)	692,157	692,157	1.70	%	0	*

Bertram H. Witham	41,000	41,000	*		0	*

Gerald Yanowitz	1,500	1,500	*		0	*

Joel Yanowitz	28,000	28,000	*		0	*

* Less than one percent.

(1) The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the selling stockholders has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares, which the selling stockholders has the right to acquire within 60 days. The Total Shares Registered Pursuant to this Offering reflects shares outstanding. Based on 40,650,006 shares of common stock outstanding.

(2) Assumes that all securities registered will be sold.

(3) Evan Collins, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(4) Robert E. Dettle, an executive of the selling shareholder, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(5) Fred Elg, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(6) Kaare Kolsted, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(6A) Paul W. Heisey, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(7) John Muhich, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(8) Paul Kaye, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(9) Lawrence R. Klar and Junelle M. Klar, the trustees of the trust, have voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(10) Kaare Kolsted, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(10A) Stefan Kreuzer, the trustee of the family partnership, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(11) Patrick C. McCulloch, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(12) J. Douglas Meador, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(13) Tim M. Betts, an executive of the selling shareholder, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(14) Theodore E. Roeth, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(15) Mark E. Tomaszek, trustee of the Anthony F. Rotando Irrevocable trust dated July 23, 2010, has voting and dispositive control over the shares.

(16) John W. Russell, an executive of the selling shareholder, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(16A) Todd Siff, an executive of Limabr Ltd., has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(17) Mark E. Tomaszek, trustee of the David E Tomaszek Irrevocable Trust Dated July 20, 2010, has voting and dispositive control over the shares.

(18) Kevin Varner, the trustee of the trust, has voting and dispositive power over the shares.

(19) Albert Varon, trustee of the Jacob Varon Irrevocable Trust dated May 18, 2011, has voting and dispositive control over the shares.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Selling Stockholders

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The selling shareholders and any of their pledgees, donees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions or by gift. These sales may be made at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling shareholders cannot predict the extent to which a market will develop or, if a market develops, what the price of our common stock will be. If a public market develops for the common stock, the selling shareholders may sell their shares of common stock in the public market based on the market price at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. Subject to the foregoing, the selling shareholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling or otherwise transferring shares:

•	ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

•	block trades in which a broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

•	sales to a broker-dealer as principal and the resale by the broker-dealer of the shares for its account;

•	an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

•	privately negotiated transactions, including gifts;

•	covering short sales made after the date of this prospectus;

•	pursuant to an arrangement or agreement with a broker-dealer to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;

•	a combination of any such methods of sale; and

•	any other method of sale permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The selling shareholders may also sell shares pursuant to Rule 144 or Rule 144A under the Securities Act, if available, rather than pursuant to this prospectus.

Broker-dealers engaged by the selling shareholders may arrange for other brokers dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling shareholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated. The selling shareholders do not expect these commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved. None of the other selling shareholders are affiliates of broker-dealers.

A selling shareholder may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares of common stock owned by them and, if the selling shareholder defaults in the performance of the secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus, or under an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling shareholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling shareholders under this prospectus.

In connection with the sale of our common stock or interests therein, the selling shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which may in turn engage in short sales of our common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The selling shareholders may, after the date of this prospectus, also sell shares of our common stock short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge their common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The selling shareholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

The selling shareholders also may transfer the shares of common stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus. In the event of a transfer by a selling shareholder other than a transfer pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 of the SEC, we may be required to amend or supplement this prospectus in order to name the transferee as a selling shareholder.

The selling shareholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. The selling shareholders have informed us that they do not have any agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the common stock.

Because the selling shareholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, they will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. Federal securities laws, including Regulation M, may restrict the timing of purchases and sales of our common stock by the selling shareholders and any other persons who are involved in the distribution of the shares of common stock pursuant to this prospectus.

We may be required to amend or supplement this prospectus in the event that (a) a selling shareholder transfers securities under conditions which require the purchaser or transferee to be named in the prospectus as a selling shareholder, in which case we will be required to amend or supplement this prospectus to name the selling shareholder, or (b) any one or more selling shareholders sells stock to an underwriter, in which case we will be required to amend or supplement this prospectus to name the underwriter and the method of sale.

We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the registration of the shares.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $0.0001 per share and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $0.0001 per share. As of July 28, 2011, there were 40,650,006 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding that are held by approximately 219 stockholders of record and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. Therefore, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors. Holders of the Company’s common stock representing a majority of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, are necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of stockholders. A vote by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation.

Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock.

The Board of Directors may later determine to issue our preferred stock. If issued, the preferred stock may be created and issued in one or more series and with such designations, rights, preferences and restrictions as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution(s) providing for the creation and issuance of such preferred stock. If preferred stock is issued and we are subsequently liquidated or dissolved, the preferred stockholders would have preferential rights to receive a liquidating distribution for their shares prior to any distribution to common shareholders. Although we have no present intent to do so, we could issue shares of preferred stock with such terms and privileges that a third party acquisition of our company could be difficult or impossible, thus entrenching our existing management in control of our company indefinitely.

Our shares of common stock are quoted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol FSPI. Our transfer agent is Interwest Transfer Agent, P.O. Box 17136, Salt Lake City, UT 84117. On June 20, 2011, the closing bid price for our common stock was $15.00.

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

OTC Bulletin Board
Quarter Ended	High		Low
June 30, 2011	$	15.00	$	10.25
March 31, 2011	$	30.00	$	4.00
December 31, 2010	$	0.30	$	0.30
September 30, 2010	$	0.30	$	0.30
June 30, 2010	$	0.30	$	0.30
March 31, 2010	$	0.30	$	0.30
December 31, 2009	$	0.30	$	0.30
September 30, 2009	$	0.30	$	0.30
June 30, 2009	$	3.00	$	3.00
March 31, 2009	$	3.00	$	3.00

Dividend Policy

On February 23, 2011, we declared a Special Dividend of $0.0125 per share payable to all shareholders of record on March 7, 2011. The dividend was paid on March 8, 2011. On April 7, 2011, we declared a Quarterly Dividend of $0.025 per share payable to all shareholders of record April 25, 2011. The quarterly dividend was paid at the end of April 2011. On July 27, 2011, we declared a Quarterly Dividend of $0.0275 per share payable to all shareholders of record as of August 11, 2011. The quarterly dividend was paid in August 2011.

Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors. There is no guarantee that we will declare or pay dividends in the future.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We currently do not have an equity compensation plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

On December 31, 2010, the Company closed a Contribution Agreement with the First Surgical Texas Shareholders pursuant to which we acquired 100% of the outstanding securities of First Surgical Texas in exchange for 39,964,346 shares of our common stock. Each of the shareholders are accredited investors as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.

On March 23, 2011, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to Don Knight, the Company’s Vice President, Finance for services rendered. Mr. Knight assigned 41,979 of these shares of common stock to Emma Haley Knight 2011 Irrevocable Trust, 36,631 of these shares of common stock to Erin Mackenzie Knight 2011 Irrevocable Trust and 21,390 of these shares of common stock to Brayden Dane Knight 2011 Irrevocable Trust. Mr. Knight is the trustee of each of these trusts.

On April 29, 2011, we issued 400,000 shares to RC Capital Group, LLC in connection with an Agreement entered with RJR Consulting Group, LLC and RJR Consulting Group, LLC (collectively “RJR Parties”) whereby the RJR Parties released our company in consideration of the shares.

This issuance of these above securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Rule 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and/or Rule 506 as promulgated under Regulation D. Each of the shareholders are accredited investors as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On December 31, 2010, subsequent to the acquisition of First Surgical Texas, the Company entered into an Agreement and Release with David Roff, a significant shareholder of the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Roff agreed to return 36,111 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company for cancellation and has provided a full release of the Company in consideration of $300,000 less the repayment of any shareholder loans or accounts payable.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the two years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related notes thereto, and our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011, and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related notes thereto. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. The operating results for the periods presented were not significantly affected by inflation.

Overview

We, along with our subsidiaries, own and operate two ambulatory surgery centers (“ASC”), First Street Surgical Center, L.P. (“FSSC”), and First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. (“FSW”), and a general acute care hospital, First Street Hospital, L.P. (“FSH”), all located in the greater Houston, Texas metropolitan area. Procedures performed include non life-threatening surgeries, such as bariatrics, reconstructive and cosmetic plastics, orthopedics, pain management, neurosurgery and podiatry, which are often completed on an outpatient or short stay basis.

Executive Summary

We operate two ambulatory surgery centers and a general acute hospital that provide treatment on both an inpatient and outpatient basis. We are a Texas-based organization with plans to expand to other areas of the country that make economic sense. Our ASC and hospital based procedures vary, ranging from orthopedics, bariatrics, spine, general surgery, pain management, podiatry, and otolaryngology (ENT). Our team of highly skilled physicians, nurses, radiology techs, scrub techs, physical therapists, dietitians, utilize the latest in equipment and technology to give our patients successful outcomes. All patient care is provided by the previously mentioned experts, and all care is directed by a physician order. We have an internal case manager that monitors each hospital patient’s progress; each patient's progress is documented with a progress note, achievement of goals, functional outcomes and a thorough discussion of a discharge plan. This interdisciplinary approach leads to a higher, more personal level of care with excellent clinical outcomes.

We have over 30 affiliated physicians, which are shareholders of the company who provide medical care and surgical services to our patients. In addition, there are an additional 60 non-affiliated physicians that use our locations for surgical procedures, many with great frequency. With the total count of surgeons exceeding ninety, 33.7% are shareholders or affiliated surgeons and 66.3% are non-owners or non-affiliates for both the year ended December 31, 2010 and as of the six months ended June 30, 2011. We believe surgeons choose to perform surgeries at First Surgical because of (1) the input and control they have over the facilities’ operations, (2) the quality of the facilities, (3) the well trained staff, (4) the reputations of the other surgeons using the facilities, and (5) the well respected, financially disciplined management team. Since our formation in 2002, we have partnered with the best surgeons in their specialties covering the greater Houston area. Since inception, these physicians (affiliated and non-affiliated) have performed nearly 41.200 procedures and the number of procedures performed each year continues to grow.

For the year ended December 31, 2010 and as of June 30, 2011, with a total count of 90 surgeons utilizing our facilities, 33.7% represent affiliated surgeons and 66.3% represent non-affiliated surgeons. Affiliated surgeons generated 57.8% and 62.2% of First Surgical’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The remaining balance of the revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, or 42.2% and 37.8%, respectively, was generated by non-affiliated surgeons. We expect the mix of non-affiliated surgeons and affiliated surgeons and the percentage of revenue generated by each of these groups to continue in the near future.

We expect the mix of unaffiliated and affiliated surgeons and the percentage of revenue generated by each of these groups to continue in the near future. All surgeons bill for their professional component separately and none of that revenue is reported by First Surgical. The main source of revenue for First Surgical is the facility fee component which is billed and collected under each facility upon completion of surgery. We plan on expanding the revenue generated by non-affiliated surgeons by introducing new technical innovations in spine, bariatrics, orthopedics and reconstructive surgery, which we believe will attract non-affiliated surgeons. We are also currently evaluating the adoption of a physician stock purchase plan, which will allow physicians to purchase equity in our company. We have engaged various experts to advise on the legality of such plan in light of the Stark and Anti-kickback regulations. As a result, until such analysis is finalized, we are uncertain if we will be able to adopt such plan in the near future or ever. In addition, the startup and development of surgical centers and the acquisition of hospitals in competitive markets we believe will allow for our company’s growth and expansion of business through the addition of non-affiliated and affiliated surgeons. The risks associated with this aspect include surgeons’ practices not growing or even slowing down, competition for surgeons to join other facilities in the market, our inability to acquire existing facilities for business reasons, our inability to start or acquire new facilities as a result of various government regulations and the lack of interest in the new and innovative technology, which all may have a negative impact on our operations including the facility fees generated by both the affiliated and non-affiliated surgeons. Further, if we are unable to adopt a physician stock purchase plan, we will be unable to expand our pool of affiliated surgeons. As affiliated surgeons have historically generated a significant portion of our revenue, any future revenue growth will be limited if we do not implement such plan.

During 2009, given increased demand for services requiring overnight stays, we determined that we needed to expand our general acute care hospital. Construction of the expansion commenced in March 2010, and the project was completed and passed inspection with the Texas Department of State Health Services during November 2010. Surgical cases were scheduled and performed on December 15, 2010. The expansion increased the hospital from 17,000 to 40,000 square feet. Bed capacity increased to nineteen, from five, and the operating rooms doubled from two to four.

Key Challenges

The following represent the challenges facing our company going forward:

●

Declining reimbursements - Third party payors are reimbursing less and less for our services. We will continue to negotiate for favorable managed care contracts, as well as looking at alternative methods of reimbursements, such as direct contracting with self-insured employers and/or unions.

●

Highly regulated industry - Over the last several years, changes in regulations regarding hospitals, specifically physician-owned hospitals, have created additional challenges from an operation perspective. Many of these changes have resulted in limitations, including moratoriums on physician-owned start-up hospitals. We have analyzed the aspects of Medicare reimbursements, and the changes in Medicare reimbursements may have a slightly harmful effect on our revenues. Although the moratorium on physician-owned start-up hospitals may prevent us from developing start up hospitals, which could have a negative impact on our growth strategy, we will be able to acquire existing hospitals as well as develop surgical centers.

●

Healthcare Reform - President Obama has identified healthcare reform as a priority. The future of healthcare reform to our book of business is concerning, yet out business model of looking at existing facilities to acquire is still advantageous. We will continue to look at hospitals that would benefit from our leadership and model going forward.

●

Accountable Care Organizations - Known as ACO's, this model of bundling payments to the facility, physician, and all other healthcare providers is concerning. Major healthcare reform bills being contemplated now by Congress include, at the very least, consideration of this model. At this time, it is difficult, if not impossible to determinate how the adoption of ACO’s may impact our operations, if at all. If adopted, the ACO model may require our company to engage additional accounting and billing personnel to coordinate payments, which, in turn, could have a negative impact on our net income.

Business Outlook

Outpatient surgical procedures, which incorporate both hospital and surgical cases, continue to increase. Due to technology, patients are going home quicker, and the availability for certain procedures just five years ago necessitating a two night stay in a hospital are now done the same day. We believe we differentiate ourselves from competitors by offering surgeons and physicians that are best of class, superior outcomes, and competitive management efficiencies. We believe we will deliver shareholder value by focusing on the key items discussed.

Payor Mix

We bill payors for professional services provided by our affiliated and non-affiliated physicians to our patients based upon rates for specific services provided. Our billed charges are substantially the same for all parties regardless of the party responsible for paying the bill for our services. We determine our net patient service revenue based upon the difference between our gross fees for services and our estimated ultimate collections from payors. Net patient service revenue differs from gross fees due to (i) managed care payments at contracted rates, (ii) government-sponsored healthcare program reimbursements at government-established rates, (iii) various reimbursement plans and negotiated reimbursements from other third-parties, and (iv) discounted and uncollectible accounts of private-pay patients.

Our payor mix is composed of contracted managed care, government, principally Medicare, other third-parties and private-pay patients.

The following is a summary of our payor mix, expressed as a percentage of net patient service revenue, exclusive of administrative fees, for the periods indicated:

	For the Year Ended
	December 31,
	2010			2009

Medicare		6.69	%		4.14	%

Worker's Compensation		3.40	%		3.80	%

Commercial Carriers		79.17	%		83.85	%

Other (self pays, hardships, etc.)		10.74	%		8.21	%

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Medicare		4.77	%		6.20	%		5.99	%		6.72	%

Worker's Compensation		4.76	%		2.12	%		4.63	%		2.25	%

Commercial Carriers		78.33	%		82.06	%		75.76	%		81.70	%

Other (self pays, hardships, etc.)		12.14	%		9.62	%		13.62	%		9.33	%

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Note 2 to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the two years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and to our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of the six months ended June 30, 2011, provide a summary of our significant accounting policies, which are all in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Certain of our accounting policies are critical to understanding our Consolidated Financial Statements because their application requires management to make assumptions about future results and depends to a large extent on management’s judgment, because past results have fluctuated and are expected to continue to do so in the future. We believe that the application of the accounting policies described in the following paragraphs is highly dependent on critical estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and highly susceptible to change. For all of these policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as estimated, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those discussed below.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired , as additional information is obtained, and as our operating environment changes. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to: (1) allowance for contractual revenue adjustments; (2) depreciable lives of assets; (3) economic lives and fair values of leased assets; (4) uncertain tax positions; and (5) contingency and litigation reserves. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on a regular basis and may employ outside experts to assist in our evaluation, as considered necessary. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of its financial statements and changes in these estimates are recorded when known.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues consist primarily of net patient service revenues that are recorded based upon established billing rates less allowances for contractual adjustments. Revenues are recorded during the period the healthcare services are provided, based upon the estimated amounts due from the patients and third-party payors, including federal and state agencies (under the Medicare and Medicaid programs), managed care health plans, commercial insurance companies, and employers. Estimates of contractual allowances under third-party payor arrangements are based upon the payment terms specified in the related contractual agreements. Third-party payor contractual payment terms are generally based upon predetermined rates per diagnosis, per diem rates, or discounted fee-for-service rates. The Company does not expect material changes in the estimate of prior period allowances for contractual and other adjustments. Further, we do not foresee changes in our estimate of unsettled amounts from third party payors as of the latest balance sheet date that could have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Laws and regulations governing the Medicare and Medicaid programs are complex, subject to interpretation, and are routinely modified for provider reimbursement. All healthcare providers participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs are required to meet certain financial reporting requirements. Federal regulations require submission of annual cost reports covering medical costs and expenses associated with the services provided by each hospital to program beneficiaries. Annual cost reports required under the Medicare and Medicaid programs are subject to routine audits, which may result in adjustments to the amounts ultimately determined to be due to the Company under these reimbursement programs. These audits often require several years to reach the final determination of amounts earned under the programs. As a result, there is at least a reasonable possibility that recorded estimates will change by a material amount in the near term. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company, upon filing the required annual CMS (Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services) cost report, received notices of final determination for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, resulting in adjustments totaling $770,000 and $148,000, respectively. These amounts were based solely on the cost report filings and are not a result of an audit. In addition, these amounts were recorded as reductions of the Company’s net revenue.

We provide care to patients who are financially unable to pay for the healthcare services they receive, and because we do not pursue collection of amounts determined to qualify as charity care, such amounts are not recorded as revenues.

Income Taxes

We provide for income taxes using the asset and liability method. This approach recognizes the amount of federal, state, and local taxes payable or refundable for the current year, as well as deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequence of events recognized in the consolidated financial statements and income tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are adjusted to recognize the effects of changes in tax laws or enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Realization is dependent on generating sufficient future taxable income. We evaluate our tax positions and establish assets and liabilities in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance on uncertainty in income taxes. We review these tax uncertainties in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, and adjust them accordingly. The Company and its corporate subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Some subsidiaries consolidated for financial reporting purposes are not part of the consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and file separate federal income tax returns. State income tax returns are filed on a separate, combined, or consolidated basis in accordance with relevant state laws and regulations. Partnerships, limited liability partnerships, limited liability companies, and other pass-through entities that we consolidate or account for using the equity method of accounting file separate federal and state income tax returns. We include the allocable portion of each pass-through entity’s income or loss in our federal income tax return. We allocate the remaining income or loss of each pass-through entity to the other partners or members who are responsible for their portion of the taxes.

Other Matters

Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same level of measurement uncertainties as those discussed above, are nevertheless important to an understanding of our Consolidated Financial Statements. All of our significant accounting policies are further described in Note 2 to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the two years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and to our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of the six months ended June 30, 2011, in this prospectus. The policies described in Note 2 often require difficult judgments on complex matters that are often subject to multiple sources of authoritative guidance and are frequently reexamined by accounting standards setters and regulators.

Results of Operations – June 30, 2011 as compared to June 30, 2010

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our operations expressed as a percentage of our net patient service revenue:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net Revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Operating Expenses
Salaries and Benefits		27.7	%		22.1	%		27.8	%		21.3	%
Medical Supplies		19.5	%		19.4	%		20.7	%		16.9	%
Bariatric Program Sponsorship		9.9	%		9.4	%		9.7	%		9.6	%
Management Fees		3.7	%		3.6	%		3.7	%		3.8	%
Rent		3.7	%		3.5	%		4.1	%		3.6	%
Depreciation and Amortization		4.5	%		3.6	%		4.3	%		2.8	%
Other Operating Expenses		20.0	%		10.8	%		16.8	%		11.4	%

Total Operating Expenses		89.0	%		72.3	%		105.1	%		70.3	%

Other Income and Expenses
Interest Expense, net		(2.6	)%		(1.7	)%		(2.5	)%		(1.8	)%

Total Other Income and Expenses		(2.6	)%		(1.7	)%		(2.5	)%		(1.8	)%

Income Before Income Taxes		8.4	%		26.0	%		10.4	%		28.8	%

Income Taxes		3.1	%		0.0	%		3.7	%		0.0	%

Net Income		5.3	%		26.0	%		6.6	%		28.8	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011, as Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

Our net revenue decreased $559,375 or 4.4%, to $12,149,557 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $12,708,932 for the comparable period in the prior year. Although our total cases increased to 1,659 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 1,616 for the three months ended June 30, 2010; and specifically our hospital cases increased by 112 from 469 cases during the three months ended June 30, 2010, to 581 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, the nature of our mix of specialty procedures performed between the two periods (e.g. podiatry, orthopedic, general surgery) caused the overall decline in revenue. For example, during the three months ended June 30, 2011, podiatry cases increased 114.2%, to 105 from 49 during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Podiatry cases have a lower net revenue per case then orthopedic and/ or neurosurgical cases.

Salaries and benefits increased $561,720 or 20.0%, to $3,365,197 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $2,803,477 for 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to: (i) the aforementioned higher case volume under the hospital; (ii) the need for new hospital clinical and administrative staffing to assist in accommodating the hospital expansion of two additional operating rooms and 14 additional beds; (iii) the need to hire additional support staff for the accounting department, and (iv) increased premium expense for the Company’s employee health insurance.

Medical supplies decreased $89,179, or 3.6%, to $2,374,480 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $2,463,659 for 2010. This slight decrease was attributable to ordering efficiency and monitoring of on-hand supplies.

Our Bariatric Program Sponsorship fees were unchanged between the two periods, at $1,200,000 per quarter.

During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, both First Street Hospital, L.P. and First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. held management agreements with First Surgical Partners, LLC (the former General Partner of the Company’s limited partnerships and the owners of which are shareholders of the Company) where we retained the services of First Surgical Partners, LLC to assist us in managing and conducting day-to-day business and services. Each agreement calls for the payment by the partnerships to First Surgical Partners, LLC a monthly fee equal to 5% of the net monthly collected revenues from the partnership’s cash collections. These fees were comparable between the two quarters.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $88,053, or 19.3%, to $543,837 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $455,784 for 2010. This increase was attributable primarily to the hospital expansion leasehold improvements and equipment, furniture and fixtures needed to complete the expansion and open it for its intended use. Those fixed assets were placed in service December 2010.

Our other operating expenses increased by $1,052,672, or 76.4%, to $2,429,615 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $1,376,943 for 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to a $750,262 charge associated with 400,000 shares of our Common Stock issued to settle all disputes we had with a provider of capital markets consulting and investor relations services. The remainder of the increase was attributable to legal and professional fees associated with our public company filings.

We recorded net interest expense of $316,727 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $213,696 for 2010, or an increase of 48.2%. The total increase of $102,918 in interest cost, or 48.1% was primarily a result of additional debt incurred in our hospital expansion.

Prior to the Company’s acquisition by Piper, on December 1, 2010, all of the net income from the Company’s subsidiaries, First Street Surgical Center, L.P., First Surgical Woodlands, L.P., and First Street Hospital, L.P. passed through to the then-limited partners of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and the Company, therefore, had no corporate tax obligation to record. Had the acquisition by Piper occurred on January 1, 2009, the Company would have incurred the following pro-forma income tax expense:

	Pro Forma for the
	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2010
Current Taxes	$	1,155,466

Deferred Taxes		-

Total	$	1,155,466

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011, as Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

Our net revenue decreased $215,796 or 0.9%, to $24,773,454 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $24,989,250 for the comparable period in the prior year. As noted above with respect to the three month period ended June 30, 2011, although total cases increased to 3,137 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 3,043 for the six months ended June 30, 2010; and specifically our hospital cases increased by 190 from 876 cases for the six months ended June 30, 2010, to 1,066 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, the nature of our mix of specialty procedures performed between the two periods (e.g. podiatry, orthopedic, general surgery) caused the overall decline in revenue.

Salaries and benefits increased $1,569,157 or 29.4%, to $6,898,257 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $5,329,100 for 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 250,000 shares of our Common Stock to our Vice President, Finance for services rendered. These shares were valued at $468,914, based on the Company’s estimate of the fair market value of its Common Shares on that date, and included as a component of our 2011 salaries and benefit expense. The balance of the increase was primarily attributable to: (i) the aforementioned higher case volume under the hospital; (ii) the need for new hospital clinical and administrative staffing to assist in accommodating the hospital expansion of two additional operating rooms and 14 additional beds; (iii) the need to hire additional support staff for the accounting department, and (iv) increased premium expense for the Company’s employee health insurance.

Medical supplies increased $905,347, or 21.4%, to $5,135,649 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $4,230,302 for 2010. This increase was attributable to the increased volume resulting from the expansion.

Our Bariatric Program Sponsorship fees were unchanged at $2,400,000 for each period.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, both First Street Hospital, L.P. and First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. held management agreements with First Surgical Partners, LLC (the former General Partner of the Company’s limited partnerships and the owners of which are shareholders of the Company) where we retained the services of First Surgical Partners, LLC to assist us in managing and conducting day-to-day business and services. Each agreement calls for the payment by the partnerships to First Surgical Partners, LLC a monthly fee equal to 5% of the net monthly collected revenues from the partnership’s cash collections. These fees decreased $39,696, or 4.1%, to $920,068 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $959,764 for 2010, as a direct result in corresponding decreases in cash collections in these two entities. The management agreements are currently in effect and we will continue to pay such fees under the agreed upon terms set forth therein.

Our rent increased $111,039, or 12.4%, to $1,009,813 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $898,774 for 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to operating medical equipment rentals that were necessary to meet the demand for equipment supporting the overall increased case volume.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $378,555, or 54.5%, to $1,072,806 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $694,251 for 2010. This increase was attributable primarily to the hospital expansion leasehold improvements and equipment, furniture and fixtures needed to complete the expansion and open it for its intended use. Those fixed assets were placed in service December 2010.

Our other operating expenses increased by $1,314,653, or 46.2%, to $4,158,201 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $2,843,548 for 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to a $750,262 charge associated with 400,000 shares of our Common Stock issued to settle all disputes we had with a provider of capital markets consulting and investor relations services. The remainder of the increase was attributable to legal and professional fees associated with our public company filings.

We recorded net interest expense of $612,587 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $438,968 for 2010, or an increase of 39.6%. The total increase of $173,398 in interest cost, or 39.4 % was a result of additional debt incurred in our hospital expansion.

	Pro Forma for the		Pro Forma for the
	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2010
Current Taxes	$	1,155,466	$	2,518,090

Deferred Taxes		-		-

Total	$	1,155,466	$	2,518,090

We anticipate that our effective tax rate will be approximately 35% for 2011.

Results of Operations – December 31, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our operations expressed as a percentage of our net patient service revenue:

	For the Years Ended
	December 31,
	2010			2009
Net Revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%

Operating Expenses
Salaries and Benefits		24.2	%		23.2	%
Medical Supplies		17.4	%		17.9	%
Bariatric Program Sponsorship		10.4	%		10.8	%
Management Fees		3.9	%		3.9	%
Rent		4.1	%		4.1	%
Depreciation and Amortization		3.4	%		3.2	%
Other Operating Expenses		12.8	%		12.0	%

Total Operating Expenses		76.1	%		75.1	%

Other Income and Expenses
Interest Expense, net		(1.9	)%		(2.3	)%

Total Other Income and Expenses		(1.9	)%		(2.3	)%

Income Before Income Taxes		22.1	%		22.6	%

Income Taxes		9.7	%		0.0	%

Net Income		12.4	%		22.6	%

Our net revenue increased $1,609,830 or 3.6%, to $46,165,361 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $44,555,531 for 2009. For all of our facilities, total cases decreased to 6,033 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to 6,081 for 2009; however, hospital cases increased by 236 from 1,551 cases to 1,789 respectively. This increase was primarily attributable to the addition of two physicians as hospital utilizers during 2010.

Salaries and benefits increased $821,130, or 7.9%, to $11,157,253, for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $10,336,123 for 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to: (i) the aforementioned higher case volume under the hospital; (ii) the need for new hospital clinical and administrative staffing to assist in accommodating the hospital expansion of two additional operating rooms and 14 additional beds in advance of the expansion opening in December 2010; (iii) the need to hire additional support staff for the accounting department, and (iv) increased premium expense for the Company’s employee health insurance.

Medical supplies increased $60,861, or 0.8%, to $8,022,665 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $7,961,804 for 2009. This slight increase was attributable to the increased level of management involvement for monitoring the purchasing and use of medical supplies.

Our Bariatric Program Sponsorship fees were unchanged between the two years ended December 31, 2010, at $4,800,000 per year.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, both First Street Hospital, L.P. and First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. held management agreements with First Surgical Partners, LLC (the former General Partner of the Company’s limited partnerships and the owners of which are shareholders of the Company) where we retained the services of First Surgical Partners, LLC to assist us in managing and conducting day-to-day business and services. Under each agreement, the facility appoints First Surgical Partners, LLC to act as exclusive agent to handle all day to day affairs but reserves the right to make all final policy decisions that will impact the overall performance or value of the facility. First Surgical Partners, LLC shall render all services, direction advice, supervision and assistance necessary to assure the facility adequately performs its ordinary and usual day-to-day services including, but are not limited to, acting as general agent on behalf of the facility and designing and implementing a marketing program including preparation of marketing materials such as brochures, media advertising materials, direct mail and press releases. The marketing efforts of First Surgical Partners, LLC shall include active solicitation of appropriate third party managed care contracts, such as PPO's and HMO's. Further, First Surgical Partners, LLC is required to maintain all licenses for each facility, coordinate all accounting functions acquire and maintain all insurance and manage all bank accounts, billing, information systems and vendor contracts. Each agreement calls for the payment by the partnerships to First Surgical Partners, LLC a monthly fee equal to 5% of the net monthly collected revenues from the partnership’s cash collections. These fees increased $54,129 , or 3.1%, to $1,802,084 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1,747,955 for 2009, as a direct result in corresponding increases in cash collections in these two entities. The management agreements are currently in effect and we will continue to pay such fees under the agreed upon terms set forth therein. The First Surgical Woodlands LP agreement was executed on February 1, 2005 with a term of five years and automatically renews for one additional two year period unless otherwise terminated in writing by either party. The First Street Hospital LP agreement was executed on July 25, 2006 with a term of ten years and automatically renews for an additional two year period unless otherwise terminated unless otherwise terminated in writing by either party. Further, both management agreements automatically terminate if either party shall file or have filed against it a petition in bankruptcy or any petition seeking reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or relief under the present or any future federal bankruptcy act or any similar present or future applicable federal, state or other statute or law, or seeking or consenting to acquiescing in the appointment of any trustee, receiver, or liquidation of all or any substantial part of its properties and such filing remains unresolved or is not dismissed within 90 days. Further, if there shall be a change in laws, regulations or general instructions, the adoption of new legislation, or a change in any third party reimbursement system, any of which materially affects the manner in which either party may perform or be compensated for its services under the agreement, the parties shall immediately propose a new service arrangement or basis for compensation for the services furnished pursuant to the agreement. If, within 30 days thereafter, the parties cannot agree upon a new service arrangement or basis for compensation, either party may terminate the agreement by providing the other party with written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the specified termination date. The agreement may be terminated immediately by either party if either party or the physicians using the facility commit a material breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement involving the Company's property or assets; commit an intentional wrongful act which materially impairs the goodwill or business of the Company or causes material damage to the Company's property, goodwill or business; commits a criminal act; or acts with gross negligence; or if any party is excluded or suspended from participation in the Medicare and/or Medicaid program.

Our rent increased $60,653, or 3.3%, to $1,872,290 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1,811,637 for 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to operating medical equipment rentals that were necessary to meet the demand for equipment supporting the increased hospital volume.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $86,604, or 5.9%, to $1,550,788 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1,464,184 for 2009. This increase was attributable primarily to the hospital expansion leasehold improvements and equipment, furniture and fixtures needed to complete the expansion and open it for its intended use. Those fixed assets were placed in service December 2010 resulting in only one partial month of depreciation.

Our other operating expenses increased by $584,525, or 11.0%, to $5,910,858 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $5,326,333 for 2009. This increase is mainly attributable to the need for a patient valet service expense initial year cost of $153,454, office supplies and utilities expense increase of $80,193, repairs and maintenance increase of $74,737, hospital dietary meals expense increase of $36,902 due to the increase in hospital cases, and professional fee increases of $114,387 .

We recorded net interest expense of $865,592 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1,025,518 for 2009, or a decrease of 15.6%. We also capitalized $63,533 and $81,498 of interest related to borrowings for projects under construction during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total decrease of $177,891 in interest cost, or 16.1%, after considering the changes in both expensed and capitalized interest, was a result of a similar decrease in weighted average borrowings during 2010 as compared to 2009.

Prior to the Company’s acquisition by Piper, on December 1, 2010, all of the net income from the Company’s subsidiaries, First Street Surgical Center, L.P., First Surgical Woodlands, L.P., and First Street Hospital, L.P. passed through to the then-limited partners of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and the Company, therefore, had no corporate tax obligation to record. Therefore, the Company’s income tax provision for 2010 only represents the tax obligation of the Company from the date of acquisition by Piper, December 1, 2010. Had the acquisition by Piper occurred on January 1, 2009, the Company would have incurred the following pro-forma income tax expense:

	Pro Forma
	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009

Current Taxes	$	4,032,277	$	3,529,631

Deferred Taxes		3,282,622		-

Total	$	7,314,899	$	3,529,631

Our 2010 deferred tax provision consisted primarily of an adjustment necessary to reflect the Company’s tax liability on the accrual basis upon the Company’s three limited partnership subsidiaries (who were all cash basis tax payers) entering into the Contribution Agreement with Piper.

We anticipate that our effective tax rate will be approximately 35% for 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash flows from operations, and borrowings under our credit lines and long-term debt.

As of June 30, 2011, we had $662,618 of cash and cash equivalents on hand as compared to $266,708 at December 31, 2010. Additionally, we had net working capital of $11,648,452 at June 30, 2011, an increase of $1,764,353 from our net working capital balance of $9,884,099 at December 31, 2010.

We were provided $229,519 of cash in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $5,640,858 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to our decrease in net income between the periods.

We used $669,435 and $625,508 of cash for investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These expenditures were primarily related to leasehold improvements and equipment purchases associated with our hospital expansion project.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we were provided $835,826 in cash from financing activities as advances under our lines of credit and long term debt were partially offset by partial repayments on those borrowing as well as our special and first quarter 2011 dividend. During the six months ended June, 2010, we used $4,991,047. Of this amount, $4,502,625 related to former limited partner distributions during the period. The balance related to net repayments on our outstanding debt obligations.

As of June 30, 2011, we had $517,701 available to us under our various credit lines. We monitor the financial strength of our depositories, creditors, insurance carriers, and other counterparties using publicly available information, as well as qualitative inputs. Based on our current borrowing capacity and compliance with the financial covenants under our credit agreements, we do not believe there is significant risk in our ability to make draws under our various credit lines, if needed. However, no such assurances can be provided.

As of June 30, 2011, we have scheduled principal payments of $1,217,456 during the next twelve months, related to long-term debt and capital lease obligations (see Note 5, Long-term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations , in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011). We do not face near-term refinancing risk. Our credit agreements governing the vast majority of our secured borrowings contain financial covenants that include a leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the covenants under our various credit agreements. If we anticipated a potential covenant violation, we would seek relief from our lenders, which would have some cost to us, and such relief might not be on terms favorable to those in our existing credit agreements. Under such circumstances, there is also the potential our lenders would not grant relief to us which, among other things, would depend on the state of the credit markets at that time.

Contractual Obligations

Long Term Debt

At June 30, 2011, our long-term debt consisted of the following:

First Street Hospital, L.P. issued a secured promissory note in the original amount of $7,822,256 on January 8, 2008, to a financial institution (the “2008 FSH Note Payable”). The 2008 FSH Note Payable bears interest at 7.70% per annum and matures on January 8, 2013. The note calls for monthly interest and principal payments of $73,747, with a balloon payment due on January 8, 2013, of $6,162,583. As of June 30, 2011, the Company owed $6,700,969 on the 2008 FSH Note Payable.

On May 4, 2010, First Street Hospital, L.P. entered into a secured construction loan agreement (the “2010 Construction Loan”) with a financial institution. Total advances under the loan agreement were $4,439,150, of which $4,410,158 remained outstanding at June 30, 2011. The note calls for monthly interest and principal payments ranging from approximately $24,507 to $38,907, with a balloon payment due on May 4, 2013, of $4,099,241. The note bears interest at 6.50% per annum.

In connection with the issuance of the 2010 Construction Loan facility, on November 30, 2010, First Street Hospital, L.P. entered into a secured promissory note (the “2010 Equipment Loan”) providing for a total principal amount of $1,863,062 with a financial institution. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $1,863,062 outstanding on the 2010 Equipment Loan. The note calls for monthly interest and principal payments ranging from approximately $9,419 to $27,753, with a balloon payment due on November 30, 2013, of $1,442,988. The note bears interest at 6.50% per annum.

First Street Surgical Center, L.P. issued a secured promissory note in the original amount of $1,652,030 on January 8, 2008, to a financial institution. The note bears interest at 7.70% per annum and matures on January 8, 2013. The note calls for monthly interest and principal payments of $15,502.88, with a balloon payment due on January 8, 2013, of $1,301,513. As of June 30, 2011, the Company owed $1,415,229 on the note.

Bariatric Program Sponsorship Agreement

We entered into a Bariatric Program Sponsorship Agreement on March 22, 2006, but effective May 1, 2006, with Vital Weight Control, Inc., d/b/a NeWeigh (‘Vital’). Per the agreement, we are sponsoring, in part, a gastroplasty program involving surgical intervention for morbid obesity. Under the sponsorship, we make available our facility for surgeries on prospective patients that are participants in the bariatric program as well as for surgeries on other prospective patients that meet criteria for eligibility for bariatric surgery. Vital is responsible for managing the bariatric program including coordinating the use of our facilities, nutritionists, other medical professionals, insurance professionals and other clinicians. Vital is also responsible for marketing, advertising and promoting the bariatric program. We are responsible for providing hospital services and making all required payments under the agreement.

In addition to the above, at all times during the term of the agreement, we shall either furnish, at our expense, or reimburse Vital amounts Vital expends for operation of the program, including office space, facilities, equipment, utilities, furniture, fixtures, office supplies, postage, courier services, and other outside services as may be reasonably required to operate the program. The original term of the agreement commenced on May 1, 2006, for a period of 36 months. As compensation for the services rendered by Vital, the Company was obligated to pay a program sponsorship fee of $200,000 per month.

On February 13, 2008, we amended the existing contract with Vital to operate a second facility in The Woodlands. The amendment further extended the term of the contract for a period of one year, thus the new termination date of the agreement became May 1, 2010. The payment of $200,000 per month continued on the existing facility as well as an additional $200,000 per month for the new facility.

On January 13, 2009, Vital terminated our agreement as a result of a breach of contract and demanded payment of $6,200,000. On February 9, 2009, we entered a Reinstatement of Contract Agreement reinstating the contract and providing a payment to Vital of $400,000 representing payments due for January 15, 2009 and February 1, 2009. Further, the Reinstatement provided that Vital, and not the Company, may terminate the agreement going forward. Further, we entered into a Grant of Exclusivity Agreement providing Vital with the exclusive right to negotiate and tender contracts for the operation and management of emergency services.

On December 10, 2009, we extended and renewed the agreement for an additional two years. Program payments for both facilities are now set to expire April 30, 2012.

Management Fees

Both First Street Hospital, L.P. and First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. hold management agreements with First Surgical Partners, LLC (the former General Partner of the Company’s limited partnerships and the owners of which are shareholders of the Company) where we retained the services of First Surgical Partners, LLC to assist us in managing and conducting day-to-day business and services. Each agreement calls for the payment by the partnerships to First Surgical Partners, LLC a monthly fee equal to 5% of the net monthly collected revenues from the partnership’s cash collections. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, these fees totaled $454,416 and $920,068, respectively. The management agreements are currently in effect and we will continue to pay such fees under the agreed upon terms set forth therein. The First Surgical Woodlands LP agreement was executed on February 1, 2005 with a term of five years and automatically renews for one additional two year period unless otherwise terminated in writing by either party. The First Street Hospital LP agreement was executed on July 25, 2006 with a term of ten years and automatically renews for an additional two year period unless otherwise terminated unless otherwise terminated in writing by either party.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At June 30, 2011, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

BUSINESS

General Overview

We were incorporated on October 2, 1998 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company intended to engage in the manufacture and sale of a broad range of proprietary natural health food supplement products. The Company began to negotiate licenses with developers of natural health food supplements approximately one month after incorporation. However, no such licenses or contracts materialized. As a result of the Company's failure to generate licenses, contracts, or sales it operated at a loss. By June 2001, virtually all funds raised by the sale of shares had been expended, and the Company thereafter became dormant. From July 1, 2001 until December 31, 2010, it was inactive and could be deemed to be a so-called "shell" company, an entity which is generally described as having no or nominal operations and with no or nominal assets or assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents.

On November 4, 2010, we entered into a Contribution Agreement with the shareholders of First Surgical Texas, Inc. (f/k/a Piper Acquisition III, Inc.), a Nevada corporation (“First Surgical Texas”), each of which are accredited investors (“First Surgical Texas Shareholders”) pursuant to which the First Surgical Texas Shareholders agreed to contribute 100% of the outstanding securities of First Surgical Texas in exchange for 39,964,346 shares of our common stock (the “First Surgical Texas Contribution”). On November 24, 2010, we entered an agreement with First Surgical Texas to extend the closing date to December 31, 2010, in consideration of a payment of $7,500. The First Surgical Texas Contribution closed on December 31, 2010. First Surgical Texas was incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 26, 2008.

Considering that, following the contribution, the First Surgical Texas Shareholders controlled the majority of our outstanding common stock and we effectively succeeded our otherwise minimal operations to those that are theirs, First Surgical Texas was considered the accounting acquirer in this reverse-merger transaction. A reverse-merger transaction is considered, and accounted for as, a capital transaction in substance; it is equivalent to the issuance of First Surgical Texas securities for our net monetary assets, which were deminimus, accompanied by a recapitalization. Accordingly, we have not recognized any goodwill or other intangible assets in connection with this transaction. First Surgical Texas is the surviving and continuing entity and the historical financials following the reverse merger transaction are those of First Surgical Texas.

We were a "shell company" (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) immediately prior to our acquisition of First Surgical Texas. As a result of such acquisition, our operations our now focused on the ownership and operation of two ambulatory surgery centers (“ASC”) and a general acute care hospital. Consequently, we believe that acquisition has caused us to cease to be a shell company as we no longer have nominal operations.

Prior to the closing of the First Surgical Texas contribution on December 31, 2010, First Surgical Texas acquired First Street Surgical Center, L.P. (“FSSC”), First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. (“FSW”), and First Street Hospital, L.P. (“FSH”) (collectively, the “Subsidiaries”) from the former partners of the Subsidiaries (the “Former Partners”) pursuant to the Contribution Agreement entered between First Surgical Texas, the Subsidiaries and the Former Partners on December 1, 2010. The Subsidiary Contribution closed on December 1, 2010, pursuant to which First Surgical Texas issued 36,000,002 shares of Common Stock in consideration of a 100% interest in the Subsidiaries. In expectation of First Surgical Texas acquiring the Subsidiaries, and in order to expedite the closing, the Company elected to enter the Contribution Agreement with First Surgical Texas prior to First Surgical Texas acquiring the Subsidiaries. First Surgical Texas subsequently acquired the Subsidiaries on December 1, 2010, and the Company then acquired First Surgical Texas on December 31, 2010. FSSC, FSW and FSH are each limited partnerships formed in the State of Texas on December 6, 2002, April 1, 2005, and March 17, 2006, respectively.

On December 31, 2010, the Company entered into an Agreement and Release with David Roff, a shareholder of the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Roff returned 36,111 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for cancellation and has provided a full release of the Company in consideration of $300,000 less the repayment of any shareholder loans or accounts payable.

Effective February 18, 2011, the Company changed its name to “First Surgical Partners Inc.” In addition, effective February 22, 2011, the Company’s quotation symbol on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board was changed from AKSN to FSPI. The new CUSIP number is 337139109.

We have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceeding.

Our Current Business

Overview

First Surgical Texas operates two ambulatory surgery centers (“ASC”) and a general acute care hospital in the Houston area. First Surgical Texas partners with top surgeons in the local medical community to perform non life-threatening surgeries at these locations. A portion of the surgeons that utilize our facilities also own securities in our company (“affiliated surgeons”). However, there is no restriction mandating that only affiliated surgeons utilize our facilities. As such, non-affiliated surgeons continue to utilize our facilities for the reasons described below which are focused on providing our surgeons with the ability to operate in a manner whereby their time and profit is maximized. All surgeons bill for their professional component separately and none of that revenue is reported by First Surgical. The main source of revenue for First Surgical is the facility fee component which is billed and collected under each facility upon completion of surgery.

As described below, we intend to further develop our business and generate additional revenue:

through the expansion of our non-affiliated surgeon base by introducing new technical innovations;

the expansion of our affiliated surgeon base through the adoption of a physician stock purchase plan if feasible; and

the startup and development of surgical centers and the acquisition of hospitals in competitive markets.

The procedures performed include bariatric, reconstructive and cosmetic plastics, orthopedics, pain management, neurosurgery and podiatry, all of which are often completed on an outpatient or short stay basis. Each of our facilities resides within its own limited partnership, which we wholly own. Since inception, the surgeons utilizing our facilities have performed nearly 41,200 procedures. Our subsidiaries, FSSC, FSW and FSH commenced operations in the State of Texas in 2003, 2005 and 2006, respectively.

Our primary goal is to become the leading provider of outpatient and short-stay surgeries in the Houston metropolitan area. We provide a comprehensive list of outpatient and short-stay surgical procedures performed by the surgeons at each site. We believe we offer a premier level of patient care as well as a highly desirable outpatient facility for surgeons to perform procedures. We compete for new surgeons through word-of-mouth marketing and our strong reputation within the healthcare community of a commitment to excellence, experienced management teams and our streamlined business model. We believe top surgeons choose to operate in this environment because it allows them to exercise a higher degree of control over their cases, staff, facilities and schedules. A surgeon, operating in our facilities, has control over and is able to select their staff and the appropriate operating forum, and freely schedule such surgeries. The flexibility in staffing, operating forum and schedule is not provided in a typical large non-specialized hospital environment. Further, the surgeons also have input on equipment to be purchased, staffing to be implemented and new specialties to be offered. The surgeons utilizing our facilities assist in the efficiency by giving constant feedback to administration, and more importantly, participating in the operations of each facility. Accordingly, we believe the ASC business model also allows surgeons that utilize our facilities to operate more efficiently compared to a typical large non-specialized hospital environment, enabling the surgeons to perform more surgeries per day, thereby optimizing time and profit.

Our goal is to continue to grow our revenues by attracting top quality surgeons, expanding our presence in the state of Texas, expand into additional markets selectively and enhance operating efficiencies.

Industry Background

We believe many physicians prefer surgery centers and general acute care hospitals. We believe that this is due to the non-emergency nature of the procedures performed at our surgery centers and surgical hospitals, which allow physicians to schedule their time more efficiently and therefore, increase the number of surgeries they can perform in a given amount of time. In addition, outpatient facilities usually provide physicians with greater scheduling flexibility, more consistent nurse staffing and faster turnaround time between cases. While surgery centers and surgical hospitals generally perform scheduled surgeries, acute care hospitals and national health service facilities generally provide a broad range of services, including high priority and emergency procedures. Medical emergencies often demand the unplanned use of operating rooms and result in the postponement or delay of scheduled surgeries, disrupting physicians’ practices and inconveniencing patients. Surgery centers and surgical hospitals in the United States are designed to improve physician work environments and improve physician efficiency. In addition, many physicians choose to perform surgery in facilities like ours because their patients prefer the comfort of a less institutional atmosphere and the convenience of simplified admissions and discharge procedures.

New surgical techniques and technology, as well as advances in anesthesia, have significantly expanded the types of surgical procedures that are being performed in surgery centers and have helped drive the growth in outpatient surgery. Lasers, arthroscopy, enhanced endoscopic techniques and fiber optics have reduced the trauma and recovery time associated with many surgical procedures. Improved anesthesia has shortened recovery time by minimizing post-operative side effects such as nausea and drowsiness, thereby avoiding the need for overnight hospitalization in many cases.

In addition to these technological and other clinical advancements, a changing payor environment has contributed to the rapid growth in outpatient surgery in recent years. Government programs, private insurance companies, managed care organizations and self-insured employers have implemented cost containment measures to limit increases in healthcare expenditures, including procedure reimbursement. We believe these cost containment measures have contributed to the significant shift in the delivery of healthcare services away from traditional inpatient hospitals to more cost-effective alternate sites, including surgery centers. We believe that surgery performed at a surgery center is generally less expensive than hospital-based outpatient surgery because of lower facility development costs, more efficient staffing and space utilization and a specialized operating environment focused on quality of care and cost containment.

Our two ambulatory surgery centers and the general acute care hospital are licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services Regulatory Licensing Unit. Further, our ambulatory surgery centers are licensed to provide prescriptions and medications, use radiation equipment and provide outpatient surgery services in the State of Texas by the Department of Health Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Board of Pharmacy, Department of Public Safety and Department of Health-Bureau of Radiation Control. In addition, all of our facilities are CMS certified, allowing them to be reimbursed by the Medicare.

Our Business Strategy

Our goal is to steadily increase our revenues and cash flows. The key elements of our business strategy are to:

●

attract top quality surgeons and other physicians to utilize our facilities;

●

expand our presence in the State of Texas, initially;

●

expand selectively in new markets; and

●

enhance operating efficiencies

Attract and retain top quality surgeons and other physicians

Prior to the acquisition of our subsidiaries, each of the limited partners of those partnerships had acquired their limited partnership interests for cash at such time they commenced using our facilities. Upon acquiring such facilities, the limited partners contributed their interest to First Surgical Texas and, in turn, the shareholders of First Surgical Texas, contributed their shares to the Company in exchange for shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Management, through their extensive contacts in the Houston, Texas medical community, will continue to market its facilities for use by additional surgeons and physicians.

Since physicians are critical to the direction of healthcare, we believe our operating model and quality of our facilities will encourage physicians to use our facilities as an extension of their practices. We believe we attract physicians because we design our facilities, structure our strategic relationships and adopt staffing, scheduling and clinical systems and protocols to increase physician productivity and promote their professional and financial success. We believe this focus on physicians, combined with providing high quality healthcare in a friendly and convenient environment for patients, will continue to increase case volume at our facilities.

Expand our presence in the State of Texas

Our primary strategy is to grow selectively in the State of Texas. We believe that selective acquisitions and development of new facilities in existing markets allow us to leverage our existing knowledge of these markets and to improve operating efficiencies.

Expand selectively in new markets

We may continue to enter targeted markets by acquiring and developing surgical facilities. Although there is no guarantee, we intend to target the acquisition or development of multi-specialty centers that perform high volume, non-emergency, lower risk procedures requiring lower capital and operating costs than hospitals. In addition, we will also consider the acquisition of multi-facility companies. In determining whether to enter a new market, we will examine numerous criteria, including:

●

the potential to achieve strong increases in revenues and cash flows;

●

whether the physicians, healthcare systems and payors in the market are receptive to surgery centers and/or surgical hospitals;

●

the demographics of the market;

●

the number of surgical facilities in the market;

●

the number and nature of outpatient surgical procedures performed in the market;

●

the case mix of the facilities to be acquired or developed;

●

whether the facility is or will be well-positioned to negotiate agreements with insurers and other payors; and

●

licensing and other regulatory considerations.

Upon identifying a target facility, we will conduct financial, legal and compliance, operational, technology and systems reviews of the facility and conduct interviews with the facility’s management, affiliated physicians and staff. Once we acquire or develop a facility, we focus on upgrading systems and protocols, including implementing our proprietary methodology of defined processes and information systems, to increase case volume and improve operating efficiencies.

Enhance operating efficiencies

Once we acquire a new facility, we will integrate it into our existing network by implementing a specific action plan to support the local management team and incorporate the new facility into our group purchasing contracts.

Bariatric Program Sponsorship Agreement

On January 13, 2009, Vital terminated our agreement as a result of a breach of contract and demanded payment of $6,200,000. The breach was the result of our failure to make the January 15, 2009 payment in the amount of $200,000 as called for under the terms of the agreement . On February 9, 2009, the parties entered a Reinstatement of Contract Agreement reinstating the contract and providing a payment to Vital of $400,000 representing the payments for January 15, 2009 and February 1, 2009. Further, the Reinstatement provided that Vital and not the Company may terminate the agreement going forward. Further, we entered into a Grant of Exclusivity Agreement providing Vital with the exclusive right to negotiate and tender contracts for the operation and management of emergency services. As consideration for providing such services, Vital is entitled to receive any amounts in excess of 4% received by the Company in connection with the provision of emergency room services.

On December 10, 2009, we extended and renewed the agreement for an additional two years. Program payments for both facilities are now set to expire April 30, 2012.

Case Mix

The following table sets forth the percentage of the internally reported case volume of our facilities from each of the following specialties for the year ended December 31, 2010:

Specialty	Percentage

Bariatric and General Surgery		21.93	%

Reconstructive and Cosmetic Plastics		22.92	%

Orthopedics		24.88	%

Pain Management		10.71	%

Neurosurgery		10.89	%

Podiatry		3.98	%

Gynecology and Urology		2.47	%

ENT		2.22	%

Payor Mix

The following table sets forth the percentage of the internally reported case volume for the year ended December 31, 2010, from each of the following payors and the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:

Payor	Percentage

Medicare		16.63	%

Workers' Compensation		5.70	%

Commercial Carriers		55.07	%

Other (self pays, hardships, etc.)		22.60	%

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Medicare		4.77	%		6.20	%		5.99	%		6.72	%

Worker's Compensation		4.76	%		2.12	%		4.63	%		2.25	%

Commercial Carriers		78.33	%		82.06	%		75.76	%		81.70	%

Other (self pays, hardships, etc.)		12.14	%		9.62	%		13.62	%		9.33	%

Competition

We have three primary competitors in the greater Houston area:

· North Cypress Medical Center;

· United Surgical Partners International; and

· Foundation Surgery Affiliates

In all of our markets, our facilities compete with other providers, including major acute care hospitals and other surgery centers. Hospitals have various competitive advantages over us, including their established managed care contracts, community position, physician loyalty and geographical convenience for physicians’ inpatient and outpatient practices.

We compete with other providers in each of our markets for patients, physicians and for contracts with insurers or managed care payors. Competition for managed care contracts with other providers is focused on the pricing, number of facilities in the market and affiliation with key physician groups in a particular market.

There are several companies, both public and private, that acquire and develop freestanding multi-specialty surgery centers and surgical hospitals. Some of these competitors have greater resources than we do. The principal competitive factors that affect our ability and the ability of our competitors to acquire surgery centers and surgical hospitals are price, experience, reputation and access to capital. Further, many physician groups develop surgery centers without a corporate partner, and this presents a competitive threat to us.

The healthcare industry, including the outpatient and short-stay surgical segment, is highly competitive and undergoes continual changes in the manner in which services are delivered and providers are selected. Competitive factors affecting our business include quality of care, cost, treatment outcomes, convenience of location, relationships with the payor, and ability to meet the needs of the patient.

Government Regulation

Medicare and Medicaid Participation in Short Stay Surgical Facilities

Medicare is a federally funded and administered health insurance program, primarily for individuals entitled to social security benefits who are 65 or older or who are disabled. Medicaid is a health insurance program jointly funded by state and federal governments that provides medical assistance to qualifying low income persons. Each state Medicaid program has the option to determine coverage for ambulatory surgery center services and to determine payment rates for those services. The State of Texas covers Medicaid short stay surgical facility services; however, it may not continue to cover short stay surgical facility services and states into which we expand our operations may not cover or continue to cover short stay surgical facility services.

Medicare payments for procedures performed at short stay surgical facilities are not based on costs or reasonable charges. Instead, Medicare prospectively determines fixed payment amounts for procedures performed at short stay surgical facilities. These amounts are adjusted for regional wage variations. A portion of our revenues, representing less than 8% of our revenue, are attributable to payments received from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

In order to participate in the Medicare program, our short stay surgical facilities must satisfy a set of regulations known as “Conditions of Participation.” Each facility can individually meet this requirement through accreditation with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations or other CMS-approved accreditation organizations, or through direct surveys at the direction of CMS. All of our short stay surgical facilities are certified to participate in the Medicare program. We have established ongoing quality assurance activities to monitor and ensure our facilities’ compliance with these conditions of participation. Any failure by a facility to maintain compliance with these Conditions of Participation as determined by a survey could result in the loss of the facility’s provider agreement with CMS, which would prohibit reimbursement for services rendered to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries until such time as the facility is found to be back in compliance with the Conditions of Participation.

The Department of Health and Human Services and the states in which we perform surgical procedures for Medicaid patients may revise the Medicare and Medicaid payments methods or rates in the future. Any such changes could have a negative impact on the reimbursements we receive for our surgical services from the Medicare program and the state Medicaid programs. We do not know at this time if any such changes will be made, when any changes will occur, and to what extent revisions to such payment methodologies will be implemented.

As with most government programs, the Medicare and Medicaid programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, possible retroactive and prospective rate adjustments, administrative rulings, freezes and funding reductions, all of which may adversely affect the level of payments to our short stay surgical facilities. In late 2005, Congress enacted legislation that limited reimbursement for certain ambulatory surgery center procedures, to the lower of the rate for ambulatory surgery centers or the rate for hospital outpatient departments. CMS implemented this legislative change effective January 1, 2007, resulting in decreased payments for approximately 280 procedures, primarily ophthalmology, dermatology and urology procedures. As part of a Congressional mandate to revise the Medicare payment system for procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers, CMS, in November 2007, issued a revised payment methodology for services performed in ambulatory surgery centers. The revised system was implemented on January 1, 2008, and is phased in over a four-year period. The revised system expanded the number of procedures that are covered in ambulatory surgery centers and, among other things, set the payment rate at approximately 65% of the payment for procedures that are performed in a hospital outpatient department. We cannot predict at this time whether additional healthcare reform initiatives will be implemented or whether there will be other changes in the administration of government healthcare programs or the interpretation of government policies that would adversely affect our business.

Federal Anti-Kickback Law

State and federal laws regulate relationships among providers of healthcare services, including employment or service contracts and investment relationships. These restrictions include a federal criminal law, referred to herein as the anti-kickback statute, which prohibits offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any form of remuneration in return for:

●

referring patients for services or items payable under a federal healthcare program, including Medicare or Medicaid; or

●

purchasing, leasing or ordering, or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing or ordering, any good, facility, service or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part by a federal healthcare program.

A violation of the anti-kickback statute constitutes a felony. Potential sanctions include imprisonment of up to five years, criminal fines of up to $25,000, civil money penalties of up to $50,000 per act plus three times the remuneration offered or three times the amount claimed and exclusion from all federally funded healthcare programs. The applicability of these provisions to some forms of business transactions in the healthcare industry has not yet been subject to judicial or regulatory interpretation. Moreover, several federal courts have held that the anti-kickback statute can be violated if only one purpose (not necessarily the primary purpose) of the transaction is to induce or reward a referral of business, notwithstanding other legitimate purposes.

Pursuant to the anti-kickback statute, and in an effort to reduce potential fraud and abuse relating to federal healthcare programs, the federal government has announced a policy of a high level of scrutiny of joint ventures and other transactions among healthcare providers. The Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services closely scrutinizes healthcare joint ventures involving physicians and other referral sources.

The anti-kickback statute contains provisions that insulate certain transactions from liability. In addition, pursuant to the provisions of the anti-kickback statute, the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General has also published regulations that exempt additional practices from enforcement under the anti-kickback statute. These statutory exceptions and regulations, known as “safe harbors,” if fully complied with, assure participants in particular types of arrangements that the Office of the Inspector General will not treat their participation in that arrangement as a violation of the anti-kickback statute. The statutory exceptions and safe harbor regulations do not expand the scope of activities that the anti-kickback statute prohibits, nor do they provide that failure to satisfy the terms of a safe harbor constitutes a violation of the anti-kickback statute. The Office of the Inspector General has, however, indicated that failure to satisfy the terms of an exception or a safe harbor may subject an arrangement to increased scrutiny. Therefore, if a transaction or relationship does not fit within an exception or safe harbor, the facts and circumstances as well as intent of the parties related to a specific transaction or relationship must be examined to determine whether or not any illegal conduct has occurred.

Our subsidiaries that are providers of services under the Medicare and Medicaid programs are subject to the anti-kickback statute.

The Office of the Inspector General has promulgated regulations setting forth certain safe harbors under the anti-kickback statute, including a safe harbor applicable to surgery centers. The surgery center safe harbor generally protects ownership or investment interests in a center by physicians who are in a position to refer patients directly to the center and perform procedures at the center on referred patients, if certain conditions are met including that the surgery center must be Medicare Certified and the operating and recovery rooms must be devoted exclusively to the Ambulatory Surgery Center, patients must be informed of the financial interest that the referring provider has with the surgery center and Federal health care program beneficiaries must be treated in a non-discriminatory fashion. Further, the terms that the investment is offered to referring providers must not be different from terms offered to non-referring providers, distributions must be in relation to the investment capital and not in relation to the volume or value of referrals made to the entity and at least one-third of each surgeon investor’s medical practice income from all sources for the previous fiscal year or previous 12-month period must be derived from the surgeon’s performance of those procedures on the list of Medicare-covered procedures for ASCs. More specifically, the surgery center safe harbor protects any payment that is a return on an ownership or investment interest to an investor if certain standards are met in one of four categories of ambulatory surgery centers (1) surgeon-owned surgery centers, (2) single-specialty surgery centers, (3) multi-specialty surgery centers, and (4) hospital/physician surgery centers.

While several federal court decisions have aggressively applied the restrictions of the anti-kickback statute, they provide little guidance regarding the application of the anti-kickback statute to our partnerships and limited liability companies. We believe that our operations do not violate the anti-kickback statute. However, a federal agency charged with enforcement of the anti-kickback statute might assert a contrary position. Further, new federal laws, or new interpretations of existing laws, might adversely affect relationships we have established with physicians or other healthcare providers or result in the imposition of penalties on us or some of our facilities. Even the assertion of a violation could have a material adverse effect upon us.

Federal Physician Self-Referral Law

Section 1877 of the Social Security Act, commonly known as the “Stark Law,” prohibits any physician from referring patients to any entity for the furnishing of certain “designated health services” otherwise payable by Medicare or Medicaid, if the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship such as an ownership interest or compensation arrangement with the entity that furnishes services to Medicare beneficiaries, unless an exception applies. Persons who violate the Stark Law are subject to potential civil money penalties of up to $15,000 for each bill or claim submitted in violation of the Stark Law and up to $100,000 for each “circumvention scheme” they are found to have entered into, and potential exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In addition, the Stark Law requires the denial (or, refund, as the case may be) of any Medicare and Medicaid payments received for designated health services that result from a prohibited referral.

The list of designated health services under the Stark Law does not include ambulatory surgery services as such. However, some of the designated health services are among the types of services furnished by our ambulatory surgery centers. The Department of Health and Human Services, acting through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has promulgated regulations implementing the Stark Law. These regulations exclude health services provided by an ambulatory surgery center from the definition of “designated health services” if the services are included in the surgery center’s composite Medicare payment rate. Therefore, the Stark Law’s self-referral prohibition generally does not apply to health services provided by an ambulatory surgery center. However, if the ambulatory surgery center is separately billing Medicare for designated health services that are not covered under the ambulatory surgery center’s composite Medicare payment rate, or if either the ambulatory surgery center or an affiliated physician is performing (and billing Medicare) for procedures that involve designated health services that Medicare has not designated as an ambulatory surgery center service, the Stark Law’s self-referral prohibition would apply and such services could implicate the Stark Law. We believe that our operations do not violate the Stark Law, as currently interpreted. However, it is possible that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will further address the exception relating to services provided by an ambulatory surgery center in the future. Therefore, we cannot assure you that future regulatory changes will not result in our ambulatory surgery centers becoming subject to the Stark Law’s self-referral prohibition.

Regulations Governing the Acquisition of Expansion of Facilities

In several states, you must obtain prior approval for the construction, acquisition or expansion of healthcare facilities or expansion of the services they offer. When considering whether to approve such projects, these states take into account the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. Currently, Texas does not require a certificate of need for construction of a new health care facility; there is no guarantee that Texas will not require such certificates or other approvals for addition of expanded facilities or service in the future. Further, many other states require a certificate of need, which could restrict the development or expansion of health care facilities in these states. Further, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) places several restrictions on existing physician owned hospitals and prohibits any new ones in the future from participating in government funded healthcare programs. Any physician owned hospital that was not certified for Medicare participation on or before December 31, 2010 is subject to that prohibition. PPACA also froze the number of operating rooms, procedure rooms and beds for which a physician owned hospital is licensed to the number of operating rooms, procedure rooms and beds that were existing on March 23, 2010, the date PPACA was enacted. Likewise, PPACA limits the percentage of physician ownership of a physician owned hospital to that percentage that existed on March 23, 2010. Therefore, any acquisitions of any physician owned hospital cannot result in a higher physician ownership percentage following the acquisition than existed with the acquired hospital on March 23, 2010.

All of these PPACA restrictions will not apply if the Company becomes “publicly traded” (as that term is defined in the federal prohibition against physician self referrals, commonly called the “Stark law”) and has at least seventy-five million dollars in shareholder equity because the Company would satisfy a different exception to the Stark law at that point. Until that seventy-five million (and publicly traded) threshold is met, the PPACA restrictions will significantly restrict our ability to acquire existing hospitals, but it does not restrict our ability to acquire or develop ambulatory surgical centers

False and Other Improper Claims

The federal government is authorized to impose criminal, civil and administrative penalties on any person or entity that files a false claim for payment from the Medicare or Medicaid programs. Claims filed with private insurers can also lead to criminal and civil penalties, including, but not limited to, penalties relating to violations of federal mail and wire fraud statutes. While the criminal statutes are generally reserved for instances of fraudulent intent, the government is applying its criminal, civil and administrative penalty statutes in an ever-expanding range of circumstances. For example, the government has taken the position that a pattern of claiming reimbursement for unnecessary services violates these statutes if the claimant merely should have known the services were unnecessary, even if the government cannot demonstrate actual knowledge. The government has also taken the position that claiming payment for low-quality services is a violation of these statutes if the claimant should have known that the care was substandard.

Over the past several years, the government has accused an increasing number of healthcare providers of violating the federal False Claims Act. The False Claims Act prohibits a person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. government. The statute defines “knowingly” to include not only actual knowledge of a claim’s falsity, but also reckless disregard for or intentional ignorance of the truth or falsity of a claim. Because our facilities perform hundreds of similar procedures a year for which they are paid by Medicare, and there is a relatively long statute of limitations, a billing error or cost reporting error could result in significant penalties. Additionally, anti-kickback or Stark Law claims can be “bootstrapped” to claims under the False Claims Act on the theory that, when a provider submits a claim to a federal health care program, the claim includes an implicit certification that the provider is in compliance with the Medicare Act, which would require compliance with other laws, including the anti-kickback statute and the Stark Law. As a result of this “bootstrap” theory, the U.S. government can collect additional civil penalties under the False Claims Act for claims that have been “tainted” by the anti-kickback or Stark Law violation.

Under the “qui tam,” or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, private parties may bring actions on behalf of the federal government. Such private parties, often referred to as relators, are entitled to share in any amounts recovered by the government through trial or settlement. Both direct enforcement activity by the government and whistleblower lawsuits have increased significantly in recent years and have increased the risk that a healthcare company, like us, will have to defend a false claims action, pay fines or be excluded from the Medicare and Medicaid programs as a result of an investigation resulting from a whistleblower case. Although we believe that our operations materially comply with both federal and state laws, they may nevertheless be the subject of a whistleblower lawsuit, or may otherwise be challenged or scrutinized by governmental authorities. A determination that we have violated these laws could have a material adverse effect on us.

Health Information Security and Privacy Practices

The regulations promulgated under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) contain, among other measures, provisions that require many organizations, including us, to employ systems and procedures designed to protect the privacy and security of each patient’s individual healthcare information. Among the standards that the Department of Health and Human Services has adopted pursuant to HIPAA are standards for the following:

· electronic transactions and code sets;

· unique identifiers for providers, employers, health plans and individuals;

· security and electronic signatures;

· privacy; and

· enforcement

In August 2000, the Department of Health and Human Services finalized the transaction standards, which we comply with. The transaction standards require us to use standard code sets established by the rule when transmitting health information in connection with some transactions, including health claims and health payment and remittance advices.

The Department of Health and Human Services has also published a rule establishing standards for the privacy of individually identifiable health information, which we comply with. These privacy standards apply to all health plans, all healthcare clearinghouses and many healthcare providers, including healthcare providers that transmit health information in an electronic form in connection with certain standard transactions. We are a covered entity under the final rule. The privacy standards protect individually identifiable health information held or disclosed by a covered entity in any form, whether communicated electronically, on paper or orally. These standards not only require our compliance with rules governing the use and disclosure of protected health information, but they also require us to impose those rules, by contract, on any business associate to whom such information is disclosed. A violation of the privacy standards could result in civil money penalties of $100 per incident, up to a maximum of $25,000 per person per year per standard. The final rule also provides for criminal penalties of up to $50,000 and one year in prison for knowingly and improperly obtaining or disclosing protected health information, up to $100,000 and five years in prison for obtaining protected health information under false pretenses, and up to $250,000 and ten years in prison for obtaining or disclosing protected health information with the intent to sell, transfer or use such information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm.

Finally, the Department of Health and Human Services has also issued a rule establishing, in part, standards for the security of health information by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers that maintain or transmit any health information in electronic form, regardless of format. We are an affected entity under the rule. These security standards require affected entities to establish and maintain reasonable and appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure integrity, confidentiality and the availability of the information. The security standards were designed to protect the health information against reasonably anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of the information and to protect the information against unauthorized use or disclosure. Although the security standards do not reference or advocate a specific technology, and affected entities have the flexibility to choose their own technical solutions, the security standards required us to implement significant systems and protocols. We also comply with these regulations.

Signed into law on February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) broadened the scope of the HIPAA privacy and security regulations. Among other things, the ARRA extends the application of certain provisions of the security and privacy regulations to business associates (entities that handle identifiable health information on behalf of covered entities) and subjects business associates to civil and criminal penalties for violation of the regulations. Violations of the HIPPA privacy and security regulations may result in civil and criminal penalties, and the ARRA has strengthened the enforcement provisions of HIPAA, which may result in increased enforcement activity. The ARRA increased the amount of civil penalties, with penalties now ranging up to $50,000 per violation for a maximum civil penalty of $1,500,000 in a calendar year for violations of the same requirement. In addition, the ARRA authorized state attorneys general to bring civil actions seeking either injunction or damages in response to violations of HIPAA privacy and security regulations that threaten the privacy of state residents.

In addition to HIPAA, many states have enacted their own security and privacy provisions concerning a patient’s health information. These state privacy provisions will control whenever they provide more stringent privacy protections than HIPAA. Therefore, a health care facility could be required to meet both federal and state privacy provisions if it is located in a state with strict privacy protections.

Number of Employees

As of December 31, 2010, we had 196 employees, of which 125 were full-time employees. We consider relations with our employees to be good.

Environmental Matters

We are unaware of any environmental matters pending or threatened related to our operations or our facilities.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Except as set forth below, the Company is not currently aware of any legal proceedings or claims that it believes will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on its business, financial condition or operating results.

On January 7, 2011, Aetna Health Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company filed a petition in the District Court of Harris County, Texas (Case Number 201101291) against First Street Hospital, L.P. (“FSH”) and St. Michael’s Emergency Center LLC (“SMEC”) primarily claiming fraud/fraudulent non-disclosure and negligent misrepresentation and seeking damages, expenses and attorneys’ fees in connection with the billing practices associated with the affiliation agreement between FSH and SMEC whereby FSH’s off-campus emergency departments are improperly submitting facility fee claims under FSH’s tax identification number. Aetna is claiming that FSH and SMEC are not properly or sufficiently integrated and affiliated and, as a result, such facility fee claims are fraudulent when submitted under FSH’s tax identification number. On February 14, 2011, FSH filed its original answer denying all allegations. Further, on March 2, 2011, FSH filed a Motion to Dismiss arguing that only federal courts have jurisdiction over ERISA matters. In response to the Motion to Dismiss, on April 7, 2011, Aetna Life Insurance Company segregated its claims and filed an additional lawsuit with the United States District of Texas Houston Division (Case Number 4:11-cv-01341) against FSH and SMEC primarily claiming fraud/fraudulent non-disclosure and negligent misrepresentation and seeking damages, expenses and attorneys’ fees in connection with the billing practices associated with the affiliation agreement between FSH and SMEC. On April 29, 2011, FSH filed a Motion to Dismiss the United States District of Texas Houston Division seeking to dismiss all claims based on state law as such claims are preempted by Federal law and seeking to dismiss all claims based on fraud and negligent misrepresentation as the claimant had not specifically plead facts supporting fraudulent knowledge and intent. In April 2011, Aetna Health Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company filed a First Amended Petition in the District Court of Harris County, Texas. Discovery in these matters is ongoing. An estimate of the amount or range of loss or possible loss cannot be made at this time. Although the lawsuits as currently pled are not clear regarding damages, the Original Petition filed by Aetna Health Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company in District Court of Harris County, Texas alleged total damages of $16.0 million in wrongfully submitted insurance claims, excluding punitive damages and attorney fees. FSH has denied all claims and intends to continue to vigorously defend these claims.

Properties

We maintain a strategy of building desirable, high quality facilities with smaller sized footprints, in order to optimize operational efficiencies, ensure high profitability per square foot, and reduce the risk of underutilization. The facilities typically have two to five operating rooms and ancillary areas for reception, preparation, recovery, and administration.

We operate two ASCs and a general acute care hospital in the Houston area. FSSC and FSW comprise the two ASC facilities. FSH is the general acute care location.

FSSC is located in Bellaire, Texas. FSSC is our flagship facility with the first procedures being performed on February 14, 2003. The FSSC facility contains approximately 12,000 square feet and consists of four operating rooms and 10 pre-operating and recovery rooms. On April 1, 2003, we entered into a building lease with Dr. Jacob Varon, a former partner of FSSC, who is also one of our Company’s current shareholders and a member of our Board of Directors. The building lease is for an initial term of ten years from commencement date followed by an option to extend the initial ten year term by two consecutive five year terms. The lease agreement calls for minimum monthly lease payments of $23,000 per month, subject to escalation to reflect increases in the consumer price index.

FSH is also located in Bellaire, Texas, directly adjacent to FSSC. FSH is our inaugural general acute care hospital. The FSH facility contains approximately 40,000 square feet and consists of four operating rooms, nineteen beds and an emergency room, upon completion of the Company’s hospital expansion project in 2010. The FSH facility is staffed by physicians at all times. On September 17, 2006, we also entered into a building lease with Dr. Jacob Varon for this facility. The building lease is for an initial term of ten years from commencement date followed by an option to extend the initial ten year term by two consecutive ten year terms. The lease agreement calls for minimum monthly lease payments of $39,400 per month, subject to escalation to reflect increases in the consumer price index. Our current lease has not been amended to reflect the hospital expansion project we completed in December 2010 as we incurred all the costs related to such expansion and have reflected such as leasehold improvements in our consolidated financial statements.

FSW is located in Woodlands, Texas. The FSW facility contains approximately 12,000 square feet and consists of five operating rooms and ten pre-operating and recovery rooms. We entered into a building lease with a non-related entity on September 1, 2005, which expires on the last day of August 2012. Base rent is as follows: $28,741 for the months of September 2005 through August 2007, $29,891 for the months of September 2007 through August 2010, and $30,783 for the months of September 2010 through August 2012.

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers and Directors

All directors of our Company hold office until the next annual meeting of the security holders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers of our Company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:

Name	Age	Position
Dr. Jacob Varon	58	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Anthony F. Rotondo	44	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Dr. David E. Tomaszek	56	Director
Don Knight	42	Vice President of Finance

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during at least the past five years of each director, executive officer and key employee of our Company, indicating the person’s principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.

Dr. Jacob Varon, Chairman of the Board

Dr. Varon is a plastic and reconstructive surgeon and has been practicing in the Houston area for more than 20 years. Dr. Varon has served as the President of the Texas Chapter of the International College of Surgeons (“ICS”), the National Chairman of Plastic Surgery for ICS since 1994 and the President and Chief Executive Officer of Jeval Laboratories Ltd. since 1993. Dr. Varon has served as the Chairman of First Surgical Partners, L.L.C. since 2002. Dr. Varon received his medical degree from Universidad Nacional de Mexico – Escuela de Medicina in 1973. Dr. Varon has been a practicing surgeon for more than 20 years and has developed and operated multiple business enterprises including the development and structuring of surgery centers with First Surgical Partners, L.L.C. Dr. Varon’s knowledge of our industry from a medical and business standpoint provides him with a deep knowledge of our business affairs and provides our company with profound insight with respect to its affairs.

Anthony F. Rotondo, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mr. Rotondo has worked exclusively in the healthcare industry for his entire career and has more than a decade of experience within the Ambulatory Surgery Center (“ASC”) segment. Mr. Rotondo served as an area manager with HealthSouth from September 1997 to December 1998, as Regional Operations Officer of Physicians Surgical Care, as Vice President of Operations of Foundation Surgical Affiliates from March 2000 to August 2000, Vice President of Operations for Surgicare from August 2000 to September 2002 and as CEO and co-founder of First Surgical Partners, L.L.C. from 2002 to present. Mr. Rotondo holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from Texas Tech University and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of St. Thomas. As a founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of First Surgical Partners, L.L.C., the former general partner of our subsidiaries, Mr. Rotondo has unparalleled knowledge of the Company’s history, strategies, technologies and culture. Mr. Rotondo has been a key component in developing our subsidiaries prior to our acquisition.

Dr. David E. Tomaszek, Director

For the last five years, Dr. Tomaszek has served as the President of Tomaszek Neurosurgical Associates PA. Dr. Tomaszek received a B.A. from Williams College in 1977 and his medical degree from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine in 1980. As a distinguished surgeon in the field of neurosurgery and a surgeon that utilizes our facilities, Dr. Tomaszek brings a unique perspective to our Board of Directors. He understands the needs of our surgeons and the healthcare industry as a whole.

Don Knight, Vice President of Finance

Mr. Knight served as an outsourced controller from 2002 through July 2007 for First Surgical Partners LLC (“FSP”), the former general partner of our subsidiaries. During this period he assisted with each facility opening, maintaining their financial needs, and reporting the financial results. Mr. Knight, as a CPA, has over twelve years of public accounting experience with various industries, but more specifically real estate enterprises, healthcare facilities and physician private practices. He specialized in accounting system setup and implementation, financial statement reporting and tax compliance. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from Texas A&M University. In July 2007, Mr. Knight was appointed, and currently serves, as the Vice President of Finance for our Company

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our directors, executive officers and proposed directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

1.	any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.	any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations and other minor offences;

3.	being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4.	being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.

Code of Ethics

As of the date hereof, the Company has not adopted a code of ethics. The Board of Directors is presently developing a code of ethics and intends to adopt such code in the near future.

Director Independence

We currently do not have any independent directors. However, our board is considering the appointment of independent directors within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules and the rules promulgated by the SEC.

Board Committees

We presently do not have an audit committee, compensation committee or nominating committee or committees performing similar functions, as our management believes that until this point it has been premature at the early stage of our management and business development to form an audit, compensation or nominating committee. However, our new management plans to form an audit, compensation and nominating committee in the near future. The audit committee will be primarily responsible for reviewing the services performed by our independent auditors and evaluating our accounting policies and system of internal controls. We intend that the audit committee will be comprised solely of independent directors and will have an audit committee financial expert as required by the rules and regulations of the SEC.

The compensation committee will be primarily responsible for reviewing and approving our salary and benefits policies (including stock options) and other compensation of our executive officers.

The nominating committee will be primarily responsible for nominating directors and setting policies and procedures for the nomination of directors. The nominating committee will also be responsible for overseeing the creation and implementation of our corporate governance policies and procedures. Until these committees are established, these decisions will continue to be made by our board of directors. Although our board of directors has not yet established any minimum qualifications for director candidates, when considering potential director candidates, our board of directors considers the candidate’s character, judgment, skills and experience in the context of the needs of our Company and our board of directors.

We do not have a charter governing the nominating process. The members of our board of directors, who perform the functions of a nominating committee, are not independent because they are also our officers. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nominations for directors. Our board of directors does not believe that a defined policy with regard to the consideration of candidates recommended by shareholders is necessary at this time because, given the early stages of our development, a specific nominating policy would be premature and of little assistance until our business operations are at a more advanced level.

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

our principal executive officer;

each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009; and

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our Company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		(5) Stock Awards ($)		(6) Stock Options ($)		Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)			Total ($)

Dr. Jacob Varon,	2010		—		—		—		—		—		—		793,604	(1)		793,604
Chairman	2009		—		—		—		—		—		—		473,470	(1)		473,470

Tony Rotondo,	2010		104,988		—		—		—		—		—		793,604	(1)		898,592
CEO	2009		104,988		—		—		—		—		—		473,470	(1)		578,458

Dr. David Tomaszek,	2010		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			—
Director	2009		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			—

Don Knight,	2010		145,002		—		—		—		—		—		—			145,002
VP of Finance	2009		145,002		—		—		—		—		—		—			145,002

(1) Payments represent funds received pursuant to the management agreements between First Surgical Partners, LLC and both First Street Hospital, L.P. and First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, both First Street Hospital, L.P. and First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. held management agreements with First Surgical Partners, LLC (the former General Partner of the Company’s limited partnerships and the owners of which are shareholders of the Company) where the Company retained the services of First Surgical Partners, LLC to assist the Company in managing and conducting day-to-day business and services. Dr. Varon and Tony Rotondo, executive officers and directors of the Company, are the owners of First Surgical Partners, LLC. The First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. agreement was executed on February 1, 2005, with a term of five years and shall automatically renew for one additional two year period unless otherwise terminated. The First Street Hospital, L.P. agreement was executed on July 25, 2006, with a term of ten years and shall automatically renew for one additional two year period unless otherwise terminated. Each agreement calls for the payment by the partnerships to First Surgical Partners, LLC a monthly fee equal to 5% of the net monthly collected revenues from the partnership’s cash collections. For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the partnerships paid a total of $1,587,208 and $946,941in management fees to First Surgical Partners, LLC. Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo are equal owners in First Surgical Partners LLC, and, as a result, half of the amount paid to First Surgical Partners, LLC was applied to Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo each. The management agreements are continuing in operation following the acquisition of First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. and First Street Hospital, L.P. by our company.

Employment Agreements

As of the date hereof, the Company has not entered into employment agreements with any of its executive officers. However, we have an at-will employment arrangement with Messrs. Rotondo and Knight pursuant to which we verbally agreed to pay the officers approximately $105,000 and $145,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011, respectively. Mr. Rotondo negotiated his salary with Board of Directors in an arms-length transaction. Mr. Knight negotiated his salary with Mr. Rotondo in an arms-length transaction as well.

2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The Company made no plan-based equity and non-equity awards grants to named executives in 2010.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The Company had no unexercised options, stock that had not vested or equity incentive plan awards for any of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2010.

Option Exercises

During our Fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 there were no options exercised by our named officers.

Compensation of Directors

Our directors have not received compensation for rendering services as directors since inception.

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directors or a committee thereof.

Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers and Other Management

None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our Company during the last two fiscal years is or has been indebted to our Company by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

The Company’s directors and executive officers are indemnified as provided by the Delaware Corporation law and its Bylaws. These provisions state that the Company’s directors may cause the Company to indemnify a director or former director against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by him as a result of him acting as a director. The indemnification of costs can include an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment. Such indemnification is at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors and is subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s policy regarding indemnification.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, The Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our directors have not received compensation for rendering services as directors since inception.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

On December 31, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Release with David Roff, a shareholder of our company, pursuant to which Mr. Roff returned 36,111 shares of common stock for cancellation and has provided a full release of the Company in consideration of $300,000 less the repayment of any shareholder loans or accounts payable.

On June 1, 2006, First Street Surgical Center, L.P. entered into a $700,000 long-term line of credit with one of its former partners, who is a current shareholder of the Company. The line of credit bears interest at 6.0% per annum and is unsecured. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company owed $321,365 and $316,592, respectively on the line of credit. The Company recognized total interest expense of $18,670 and $17,585 during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

On September 17, 2006, First Street Hospital, LP entered into a building lease with Dr. Jacob Varon, who is a current shareholder of the Company as well as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The building lease is for an initial term of 10 years from commencement date followed by an option to extend the initial ten year term by two consecutive ten year terms. The lease agreement calls for minimum monthly lease payments of $39,400 per month, subject to escalation to reflect increases in the consumer price index. During 2010, the hospital expanded its square footage by 23,000, adding 14 beds and two operating rooms. The expansion was opened for surgical procedures on December 15, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, a lease document or an amendment to the original lease had not been finalized or signed. A fair market valuation and assessment of rent is being performed in order to assess the new rental terms. The expansion project was funded 100% by First Street Hospital for $5,502,660 of which $4,436,150 was financed under long-term notes. For each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, First Street Hospital, LP paid $510,517 in lease payments to Dr. Varon.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $604,637 due from First Surgical Memorial Village LP, and entity managed by the former general partner of the Company’s three operating partnerships. This amount was repaid in 2010.

On April 1, 2003, First Street Surgical Center, LP entered into a building lease with Dr. Jacob Varon, who is a current shareholder of the Company as well as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The building lease is for an initial term of 10 years from commencement date followed by an option to extend the initial ten year term by two consecutive five year terms. The lease agreement calls for minimum monthly lease payments of $23,000 per month, subject to escalation to reflect increases in the consumer price index. In each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, First Street Surgical Center, LP paid $320,640 in lease payments to Dr. Varon.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of August 16, 2011, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares, as well as by each of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.

Name of Beneficial Owner (1)	Common Stock Beneficially Owned		Shares of Common Stock Subject to Voting Agreement(6)		Percentage of Common Stock (3)

Dr. Jacob Varon (2) (6)(9)		6,921,577		36,000,002		89.44	%

Anthony F. Rotondo (2)(4)(6)		6,293,737		36,000,002		89.44	%

Dr. David E. Tomaszek (2)(5)(7)		3,992,655		0		9.92	%

Don Knight (2)(8)		250,000		0		*

All officers and directors as a group (4 people)		17,457,969		36,000,002		89.44	%

* Less than 1%

	(1)	Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o First Surgical Partners, L.L.C., 411 First Street, Bellaire, Texas 77401.
	(2)	Executive officer and/or director of the Company.
	(3)	Applicable percentage ownership is based on 40,650,006 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 16, 2011, together with securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of August 16, 2011 for each stockholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 16, 2011 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
	(4)	Includes 5,293,737 shares of common stock held by Anthony F. Rotondo and 1,000,000 shares of common stock held by The Anthony F. Rotondo Irrevocable Trust dated July 23, 2010.. Mr. Rotondo is the beneficiary of such trust but does not serve as the trustee and, as a result, does not have voting or dispositive control over such securities.
	(5)	Includes 3,532,655 shares of common stock held by David E. Tomaszek and 390,000 shares of common stock held by The David E. Tomaszek Irrevocable Trust dated July 20, 2010. Dr. Tomaszek is the beneficiary of such trust but does not serve as the trustee and, as a result, does not have voting or dispositive control over such securities.
	(6)	On November 4, 2010, we entered into a Contribution Agreement with the shareholders of First Surgical Texas, Inc. (f/k/a Piper Acquisition III, Inc.), a Nevada corporation (“First Surgical Texas”), each of which are accredited investors (“First Surgical Texas Shareholders”) pursuant to which the First Surgical Texas Shareholders agreed to contribute 100% of the outstanding securities of First Surgical Texas in exchange for 39,964,346 shares of our common stock (the “First Surgical Texas Contribution”). On November 24, 2010, we entered an agreement with First Surgical Texas to extend the closing date to December 31, 2010 in consideration of a payment of $7,500. The First Surgical Texas Contribution closed on December 31, 2010. Prior to the closing of the First Surgical Texas contribution, First Surgical Texas acquired First Street Surgical Center, L.P. (“FSSC”), First Surgical Woodlands, L.P. (“FSW”), and First Street Hospital, L.P. (“FSH”) (collectively, the “Subsidiaries”) from the former partners. Pursuant to that certain voting agreement executed in connection with the acquisition of FSSC, FSW and FSH by First Surgical Texas, each of the former owners of the Subsidiaries granted Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo, affiliates of the Company, the authority to vote their shares of the Subsidiaries or such successor of the Subsidiaries as Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo deem appropriate in their sole discretion. Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares governed by the Voting Agreement.
	(7)	Dr. Tomaszek, a director of our company, entered a voting agreement in connection with the acquisition of the Subsidiaries by First Surgical Texas, whereby he granted Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo, affiliates of the Company, the authority to vote his shares of the Subsidiaries or such successor of the Subsidiaries as Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo deem appropriate in their sole discretion. Dr. Varon and Mr. Rotondo disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares governed by the Voting Agreement. The Voting Agreement terminates on December 31, 2011.
	(8)	Represents 150,000 shares of common held by Mr. Knight, 41,979 shares of common stock held by the Emma Haley Knight 2011 Irrevocable Trust, 36,631 shares of common stock held by the Erin Mackenzie Knight 2011 Irrevocable Trust and 21,390 shares of common stock held by the Brayden Dane Knight 2011 Irrevocable Trust. Mr. Knight is the trustee of each of these trusts and has dispositive and voting control over such shares. Mr. Knight disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities held by the trusts.
	(9)	Includes 6,229,420 shares of common stock held by Dr. Jacob Varon and 692,157 shares of common stock held by The Jacob Varon Irrevocable Trust dated May 18, 2011.. Dr. Varon is the beneficiary of such trust but does not serve as the trustee and, as a result, does not have voting or dispositive control over such securities.

Changes in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our Company.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

Our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $0.0001 per share and 50,000,00 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $0.0001 per share. As of August 16, 2011, there are 40,650,006 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding that are held by approximately 220 stockholders of record and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. Therefore, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors. Holders of our common stock representing a majority of the voting power of our capital stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, are necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of stockholders. A vote by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock.

CHANGE OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

On December 31, 2010, we closed a Contribution Agreement with the shareholders (“First Surgical Texas Shareholders”) of First Surgical Texas Inc., a Nevada corporation (“First Surgical Texas”), each of which are accredited investors pursuant to which the First Surgical Texas Shareholders contributed 100% of the outstanding securities of First Surgical Texas in exchange for 39,964,346 shares of our common stock (the “First Surgical Texas Contribution”). Considering that, following the contribution, the First Surgical Texas Shareholders control the majority of our outstanding common stock and we effectively succeeded our otherwise minimal operations to those that are theirs, First Surgical Texas is considered the accounting acquirer in this reverse-merger transaction. At the time of the First Surgical Contribution, Kabani & Company, Inc. (the “New Auditor”) was the independent auditor of record for First Surgical Texas. Accordingly, on December 31, 2010 (the “Engagement Date”), by reason of the First Surgical Texas Contribution, the New Auditor became the principal independent accountant for the Company. Therefore, on January 12, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company dismissed Stan J.H. Lee, CPA (the “Former Auditor”) from its position as the principal independent accountant for the Company. On January 12, 2011 (the “Dismissal Date”), the Company advised the Former Auditor that it was dismissed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to dismiss the Former Auditor as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on January 10, 2011. Except as noted in the paragraph immediately below, the reports of the Former Auditor on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and such reports were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle.

The reports of the Former Auditor on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 contained an explanatory paragraph which noted that there was substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of our results of operations and lack of liquidity.

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and through the Dismissal Date, we have not had any disagreements with the Former Auditor on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the Former Auditor’s satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for such years.

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and through the Dismissal Date, there were no reportable events, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

We requested that Former Auditor furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the above statements. A copy of this letter was attached as exhibit 16.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2011.

As explained above, on the Engagement Date, the New Auditor assumed the position of the principal independent accountant for the Company. During the two most recent fiscal years and through the Engagement Date, we have not consulted with the New Auditor regarding either:

application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that the New Auditor concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or

2.	any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and the related instructions) or reportable event (as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(v)).

EXPERTS

Our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended have been audited by Kabani & Company, Inc. and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of such firm as an expert in accounting and auditing in giving such report.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of common stock offered through this prospectus will be passed on by Fleming PLLC, 49 Front Street, Suite #206, Rockville Centre, New York 11570. Stephen M. Fleming, the managing member was a shareholder of First Surgical Texas and received 170,000 shares of common stock upon closing of the Contribution on December 31, 2010.

HOW TO GET MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarter and periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission using the Commission’s EDGAR system. You may inspect these documents and copy information from them at the Commission’s offices at public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. The address of such site is http//www.sec.gov.

We have filed a registration statement with the Commission relating to the offering of the shares. The registration statement contains information which is not included in this prospectus. You may inspect or copy the registration statement at the Commission’s public reference facilities or its website.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any person to provide you with any information that is different.

FIRST SURGICAL PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009			F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended as at December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders ’ Equity for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended as at December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			F-7
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010			F-19
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and 2010 (unaudited)			F-20
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and 2010 (unaudited)			F-21
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements			F-22

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

First Surgical Partners Inc. (f/k/a Arkson Nutraceuticals Corp.)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Surgical Partners Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of First Surgical Partners Inc. at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Kabani & Company

KABANI & COMPANY

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Los Angeles, CA

June 16, 2011

F-2

FIRST SURGICAL PARTNERS INC.

(FORMERLY, ARKSON NUTRACEUTICALS, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	As of December 31,
	2010			2009

Assets

Current Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	266,708		$	261,594
Accounts Receivable, net		22,874,493			20,141,436
Due From Affiliates		-			604,637
Inventory		1,413,275			742,780
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets		298,104			233,597

Total Current Assets		24,852,579			21,984,044

Property and Equipment, net		14,946,782			8,039,404

Other Assets, net		64,379			68,620

Total Assets	$	39,863,740		$	30,092,068

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	9,634,602		$	6,906,807
Accrued Expenses		1,380,223			503,454
Lines of Credit		1,521,250			1,289,801
Current Taxes Payable		1,194,128			-
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt
and Capital Lease Obligations		1,238,277			1,737,985

Total Current Liabilities		14,968,480			10,438,047

Long-Term Liabilities
Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations, Net
of Current Portion		13,699,670			8,999,346
Deferred Taxes Payable		3,282,622			-
Other Long-Term Liabilities		74,130			188,452

Total Long-Term Liabilities		17,056,422			9,187,798

Commitments and Contingencies

Shareholders' Equity
Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, zero issued and outstanding, respectively		-			-
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized,
40,000,005 and 39,964,346 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		4,000			3,996
Additional Paid-In Capital		11,716,594			2,874,410
Retained Earnings/(Accumulated Deficit)		(3,881,756	)		7,587,817

Total Shareholders' Equity		7,838,838			10,466,223

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	39,863,740		$	30,092,068

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

FIRST SURGICAL PARTNERS INC.

(FORMERLY, ARKSON NUTRACEUTICALS, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

Net Revenue	$	46,165,361		$	44,555,531

Operating Expenses
Salaries and Benefits		11,157,253			10,336,123
Medical Supplies		8,022,665			7,961,804
Bariatric Program Sponsorship		4,800,000			4,800,000
Management Fees		1,802,084			1,747,955
Rent		1,872,290			1,811,637
Depreciation and Amortization		1,550,788			1,464,184
Other Operating Expenses		5,910,858			5,326,333

Total Operating Expenses		35,115,938			33,448,036

Other Income and Expenses
Interest Income		1,235			2,682
Interest Expense		(865,592	)		(1,025,518	)

Total Other Income and Expenses		(864,357	)		(1,022,836	)

Income Before Income Taxes		10,185,066			10,084,659

Income Taxes		4,476,750			-

Net Income	$	5,708,316		$	10,084,659

Basic and Diluted Income
per Common Share	$	0.14		$	0.25

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic and fully diluted		39,964,444			39,964,346

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

FIRST SURGICAL PARTNERS INC.

(FORMERLY, ARKSON NUTRACEUTICALS, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	5,708,316		$	10,084,659
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		1,550,788			1,464,184
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable		(2,061,927	)		(1,510,399	)
Inventory		(670,494	)		(140,287	)
Other Current Assets		(64,506	)		108,117
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses		3,465,488			1,294,218
Current and Deferred Taxes Payable		4,476,750			-

First Surgical Partners Inc. S-1