UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to ________________

Commission File Number: 000-09751

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	83-0242652
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

3000 Lakeside Drive, Suite 300 South, Bannockburn, IL 60015

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(847) 604-5366

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) ~~Yes ¨ No x~~

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at ~~January~~July 31, ~~2009~~2010
Common Stock, $.01 par value		2428,~~945~~903,~~807~~112

FORM 10-Q

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page(s)	~~Page(s)~~
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 (unaudited) and March 31, 2009		3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and March 31, 2010	1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income/(Operations) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Deficiency for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Deficiency for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009 (unaudited)		6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)		7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	18
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		21
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		28
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.	24
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.		28
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.	25
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.		29
Item 1A. Risk Factors	25
Item 1A. Risk Factors		29
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	25
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		29
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	25
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.		29
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.	25
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.		30
Item 5. Other Information.	25
Item 5. Other Information.		30
Item 6. Exhibits.	26
Item 6. Exhibits.		31
SIGNATURES	27
SIGNATURES		32
Exhibits
Exhibits		33
Certifications
Certifications

Item 1. Financial Statements.

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			March 31,
	June 30,			March 31,
	2009			2009
	2010			2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	1,901		$	1,000
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $13,813	$	714,374		$	436,013
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $13,813 and $31,000, respectively		162,015			171,924
Inventories		21,101			39,485
Inventories		36,117			140,384
Prepaid expense and other current assets		438,655			77,154
Prepaid expense and other current assets		44,781			17,214
Total Current Assets		1,174,130			552,652
Total Current Assets		244,814			330,522
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $226,822 and $211,003, repectively		141,624			157,443
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $195,225 and $150,517 repectively		149,721			194,429
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $54,157, respectively		-			8,871
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $258,949 and $458,229 repectively		63,697			206,002
Security deposits and other assets		50,959			50,959
Total Assets	$	~~509~~1,~~191~~366,713		$	~~781~~769,~~912~~925
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable (including $450,000 and $200,000 due to a related party, respectively), net of debt discount of $19,333 and $0, respectively	$	1,081,917		$	601,250
Notes payable (including $450,000 due to a related party), net of debt discount of $0 and $8,034, respectively	$	1,101,250		$	1,093,216
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $408,345 and $696,575, respectively		2,104,655			803,425
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $149,956 and $150,345, respectively		2,341,544			2,012,655
Accounts payable		1,~~354~~062,~~444~~061			1,~~120~~275,~~820~~245
Accrued expenses		~~213~~219,~~578~~204			~~263~~584,~~426~~230
Accrued compensation, taxes and interest		1,782,470			1,209,735
Accrued compensation and payroll taxes		2,108,239			1,924,210
Interest payable (including $45,059 and $39,480 due to related party, respectively)		287,250			235,165
Interest payable (including $57,271 and $53,713 due to related party, respectively)		347,853			303,749
Deferred revenue		~~414~~388,~~034~~256			~~387~~453,~~281~~326
Derivative liability		32,~~761~~568,000			-3,885,000
Total Current Liabilities		10,~~999~~136,~~348~~407			411,~~621~~531,~~102~~631
Long-term Liabilities:
Notes payable (including $0 and $250,000 due to related party), net of debt discount of $0 and $53,856, respectively		-			446,144
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $554,820 and $609,316, respectively		114,360			192,404
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $290,469 and $643,600, respectively		135,531			394,401
Total Liabilities		10,250,767			11,724,035
Total Liabilities		11,134,879			5,461,647
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficiency:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 24,201,447 and 23,807,474 issued and outstanding, respectively		242,014			238,074
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 28,903,112 and 25,745,447 issued and outstanding, respectively		289,031			257,454
Additional paid-in capital		1617,~~450~~917,~~281~~906			1917,~~026~~068,~~089~~256
Accumulated deficit		(27,~~317~~090,~~983~~991	)		(2328,~~943~~279,~~898~~820	)
Total Stockholders' Deficiency		(108,~~625~~884,~~688~~054	)		(410,~~679~~954,~~735~~110	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency	$	~~509~~1,~~191~~366,713		$	~~781~~769,~~912~~925

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME/(OPERATIONS)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended December 31,
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Revenue	$	~~791~~1,~~646~~164,276		$	~~444~~530,~~933~~692
Cost of Sales		6168,~~863~~115			7861,~~122~~804
Gross Profit		~~729~~1,~~783~~096,161			~~366~~468,~~811~~888
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses		871,963			1,046,743
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (including stock-based compensation of $101,250 and $34,000, repectively)		922,933			1,042,026
Operating Loss		(142,180	)		(679,932	)
Operating Income/(Loss)		173,228			(573,138	)
Other Expense:
Other (Income)/Expense:
Interest (including $13,750 and $13,712 to related parties for 2009 and 2008 periods, respectively)		64,191			161,049
Interest (including $13,750 to related parties for 2010 and 2009 periods, respectively)		137,297			52,814
Common stock and warrants issued in association with debt		2,925			4,500
Interest expense related to warrants and conversion features issued in association with debt		203,351			810,475
Amortization of debt discount		384,411			328,477
Interest expense related to change in fair value of warrants and conversion features granted for ratchet provisions		-			5,936,000
Amortization of deferred financing costs		40,331			135,123
Amortization of debt discount		258,880			361,386
Gain on change in fair value of derivatives		(281,000	)		-
Amortization of deferred financing costs		8,871			93,143
Total Other Expense		210,858			629,149
Gain on change in fair value of derivatives		(1,624,000	)		(4,260,000	)
NET LOSS	$	(353,038	)	$	(1,309,081	)
Total Other (Income)/Expense		(1,015,601	)		2,993,818
NET LOSS PER SHARE - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.06	)
Net Income/(Loss)	$	1,188,829		$	(3,566,956	)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding -
Net Income/(Loss) Per Share - Basic	$	0.04		$	(0.15	)
Basic and Diluted		24,646,892			23,795,064
Net Income/(Loss) Per Share - Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.15	)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding - Basic		29,066,610			23,813,628
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted		41,709,330			23,813,628

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2009			2008
Revenue	$	1,963,370		$	2,496,291
Cost of Sales		184,054			353,298
Gross Profit		1,779,316			2,142,993
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses		2,983,678			3,390,505
Operating Loss		(1,204,362	)		(1,247,512	)
Other Expense:
Interest (including $41,250 and $54,654 to related parties for 2009 and 2008 periods, respectively)		161,495			251,792
Common stock and warrants issued in association with debt		6,799,300			25,425
Amortization of debt discount		1,121,629			889,623
Amortization of deferred financing costs		166,305			367,769
Gain on change in fair value of derivatives		(5,588,000	)		-
Total Other Expense		2,660,729			1,534,609
NET LOSS	$	(3,865,091	)	$	(2,782,121	)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.12	)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding -
Basic and Diluted		24,321,988			23,728,733

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

					Additional						Total
	Common Stock				paid-in			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		capital			deficit			Deficiency
Balance, April 1, 2009		23,807,474	$	238,074	$	19,026,089		$	(23,943,898	)	$	(4,679,735	)
Balance, April 1, 2010		25,745,447	$	257,454	$	17,068,256		$	(28,279,820	)	$	(10,954,110	)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle - reclassification of equity-linked financial instruments to derivative liabilities		-		-		(2,600,261	)		491,006			(2,109,255	)
Issuance of common stock for investment advisory services		1,800,000		18,000		468,000			-			486,000
Warrant Exercise		160,000		1,600		-			-			1,600
Issuance of common stock for extension agreement		1,341,665		13,417		375,665			-			389,082
Conversion of Convertible Debentures		100,000		1,000		24,000			-			25,000
Warrant exercise		16,000		160		-			-			160
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity		-		-		15,000			-			15,000
Issuance of debt related penalty warrants		-		-		2,985			-			2,985
Reclassification of equity to derivative liability		-		-		(107,000	)		-			(107,000	)
Reclassification of warrants from liabilities		-		-		3,000			-			3,000
Stock-based compensation		-		-		34,000			-			34,000
Net Income		-		-		-			1,188,829			1,188,829
Issuance of debt related penalty warrants		-		-		10,800			-			10,800
Balance, June 30, 2010		28,903,112	$	289,031	$	17,917,906		$	(27,090,991	)	$	(8,884,054	)
Issuance of warrants related to a settlement agreement		-		-		15,500			-			15,500
Issuance of common stock for interest		133,973		1,340		32,153						33,493
Net Loss									(3,865,091	)		(3,865,091	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		24,201,447	$	242,014	$	16,450,281		$	(27,317,983	)	$	(10,625,688	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended December 31,
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	2010			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(3,865,091	)	$	(2,782,121	)
Net income/(loss)	$	1,188,829		$	(3,566,956	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		4415,~~708~~819			4414,~~666~~993
Common stock and warrants issued in association with debt		6,799,300			25,425
Interest expense related to warrants and conversion features issued in association with debt and ratchet provisions		203,351			6,746,475
Common stock issued for interest		33,493			17,646
Common stock issued for investment advisory services		101,250			-
Provision for doubtful accounts		~~10,000~~-			-10,000
Gain on change in fair value of derivatives		(51,~~588~~624,000	)		-(4,260,000	)
Amortization of debt discount		1258,~~121,629~~880			~~889~~361,~~623~~386
Amortization of deferred financing costs		~~166~~8,~~305~~871			~~367~~93,~~768~~143
Deferred rent expense		(5912,~~849~~997	)		(2817,~~940~~086	)
Non-cash stock based compensation charge		34,000			53,250
Stock based compensation		-			34,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(91278,361	)		~~227~~31,~~422~~390
Inventories		~~104~~18,~~267~~384			~~(133~~41,~~550~~527	)
Prepaid expense and other current assets		~~(27~~23,~~567~~249	)		~~125,005~~174
Security deposits and other assets		-			~~22,175~~-
Accounts payable		~~233~~(213,~~624~~184	)		2425,~~601~~852
Accrued expenses		10(16,~~000~~614	)		~~206,536~~-
Accrued compensation		572,735			101,291
Accrued compensation and payroll taxes		184,029			225,385
Interest payable		5244,~~085~~104			5928,~~020~~726
Deferred revenue		26(65,~~753~~070	)		(49,~~930~~358	)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(~~331~~163,~~699~~460	)		(~~730~~280,~~253~~349	)
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(12,702	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from convertible notes payable		~~355~~163,~~000~~300			~~865~~303,~~000~~750
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		~~1,600~~160			-800
Repayment of notes payable		-			(50,750	)
Deferred financing costs		-			(24,000	)
Deferred financing costs		(24,000	)		(143,026	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		163,460			280,550
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		332,600			671,224
NET INCREASE IN CASH		-			201
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		901			(71,731	)
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		-			1,000
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		1,000			73,076
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	-		$	1,201
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	1,901		$	1,345
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	4914,~~297~~734		$	~~22,603~~-

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended December 31,
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	2010			2009
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal on accumulated deficit	$	491,006		$	-
Issuance of common stock to investment advisors debentures	$	486,000		$	-
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal on paid in capital	$	(2,600,261	)	$	-
Issuance of common stock for extension agreement	$	389,082		$	-
Issuance of common stock for conversion of convertible debentures	$	25,000		$	-
Reclassification of warrants from liabilities	$	3,000		$	-
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity	$	15,000
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal on accumulated deficit	$	-		$	491,006
Reclassification of warrants to derivative liability	$	(107,000	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal on paid in capital	$	-		$	(2,600,261	)
Issuance of warrants related to debt acquisition	$	-		$	397,997
Issuance of common stock and warrants to financial advisors	$	-		$	284,086
Issuance of warrants to placement agents	$	-		$	31,500
Beneficial conversion related to convertible debentures	$	-		$	427,564

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

~~STATMON~~NOTES ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~TO ~~CORP.~~THE ~~AND~~CONDENSED ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

1.	BUSINESS DESCRIPTION, GOING CONCERN AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Company Overview

Statmon Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) is a wireless and fiber infrastructure network management solution provider. “Axess”, our proprietary flagship software application, and our supporting integration products are deployed in telecommunications, media broadcast and navigation aid transmission networks to optimize operations and keep them fully functional 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year. A typical infrastructure network comprises a network operations center (“NOC” or “Master Control”) plus a network of remote transmission sites incorporating a wide range of devices, facilities management and environmental control systems.

The Statmon Platform is designed to self heal or preempt transmission failure by automating the integration of all the different devices and disparate technologies under a single control system, or permit corrective action at the NOC. A tiered severity level alarm system at every site, down to the device level, reports back to the NOC permitting manual adjustment or corrective action without having to visit the site. An authorized operator can drill down and make manual adjustments to an individual device at a remote site from any connected location including a wireless device such as a laptop or Blackberry.

Architecturally designed as a universal “Manager of Technologies” (“MOT”) application or platform, wide scale network operations, regardless of disparate equipment brands or incompatible technologies deployed at a NOC or remote site, can automatically interact with each other while being managed from a single point of control or “dashboard” style computer screen. In real time, a ~~proactive~~ proactive alarm system reports to a NOC or designated wireless device for ~~appropriate~~ appropriate attention or action. Adjusting the HVAC, the health of the uninterrupted power supply (“UPS”) and diesel generator and the level of the fuel tank, as well as disaster recovery, emergency power management, and redundancy are all proactive management capabilities of the Statmon Platform. The Statmon Platform will keep remote sites operating even when part or all of the entire network are down, automatically bringing the remote sites back on line when network operations are restored.

The marketing and distribution of our products are primarily facilitated by value-added resellers (“VAR’s”), sales channel strategic partners and original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) collaborations. Sales channel partners are developed and managed by an internal business development team and supported by a direct sales force. The Company is seeking additional partners with appropriate credentials for large scale implementations.

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries, Statmon-eBI Solutions, LLC and STC Software Corp. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. These financial statements reflect all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature that, in the opinion of management, are necessary in order to make the financial statements not misleading. The results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.

~~STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP~~1. BUSINESS DESCRIPTION, GOING CONCERN AND ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

~~NOTES~~These financial TOstatements ~~CONDENSED~~should ~~CONSOLIDATED~~be ~~FINANCIAL~~read ~~STATEMENTS~~in conjunction with the audited financial ~~(UNAUDITED)~~statements and the notes thereto of all the entities included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

1. BUSINESS DESCRIPTION, GOING CONCERN AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto of all the entities included in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

Going Concern

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America ("US GAAP") for interim financial statement information. The Company has incurred net losses of approximately $27.~~3 million~~1 million since inception. Additionally, the Company had a net working capital ~~deficiency~~ deficiency of approximately $109.80 million at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As ~~more~~of ~~fully~~June ~~described~~30, in2010, the ~~Notes~~Company ~~below~~has $2,491,500 ~~the~~of ~~Company~~Convertible ~~funded~~Debentures ~~its~~due ~~operations~~before June ~~during~~30, ~~the nine~~2011 ~~months~~of ~~ended~~which ~~December~~$1,125,000 became due on May 31, ~~2009~~2010 byand ~~raising~~$648,000 anbecame due ~~additional~~on June 30, 2010. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, $~~355~~562,~~000~~500 was paid to the holders of the debentures that became due on May 31, 2010. The Company ~~proceeds~~is ~~through~~currently in negotiations to extend the ~~sale~~due date or to obtain additional financing to settle the outstanding debentures. The Company also has $1,101,250 in unsecured notes payable that are in default and has accrued payroll tax obligations of ~~Senior~~$2,108,239 ~~Secured~~including ~~Convertible~~penalties ~~Debentures~~and interest.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As more fully described in the Notes below, the Company funded its operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 by raising an additional $163,300 of proceeds through the sale of Senior Secured Convertible Debentures.

Management Plans

In order to reduce debt and simultaneously maximize growth and expansion of operations, the Company has required capital infusions to augment its total capital needs. ~~While~~The Company had operating income for the ~~Company~~quarter ended June 30, 2010 and anticipates its future operations will be cash flow positive. However, ~~delays~~ inDelays in customer’s implementation timelines, payment schedules and delivery roll outs directly impact short-term cash flow expectations ~~causing~~and may cause the Company to to increase its borrowings. The Company and its sales channel partners have developed a pipeline of qualified sales opportunities. The revenues from such prospective sales pipelines are expected to grow as the existing and new sales channel partner relationships develop.

During the first ~~nine~~three months of Fiscal ~~2010~~2011, the Company has raised $~~355~~163,~~000~~300 of proceeds related to the third tranche of Convertible Debentures, ~~the~~and ~~net~~produced ~~proceeds~~operating ~~were~~income of $173,228 which was used to reduce ~~certain~~ outstanding obligations.

AsThere ofcan ~~December~~be ~~31,~~no ~~2009,~~assurances that the Company ~~has~~will ~~$1,475,000~~be ofsuccessful ~~Convertible~~in ~~Debentures~~obtaining ~~due on~~the ~~March~~aforementioned 5,operating ~~2010 and $1~~results,~~038,000~~ ~~due~~financing ~~before~~or ~~December 31~~refinancing, ~~2010. Since~~converting ~~the~~and/or ~~Company’s~~extending ~~stock~~its ~~price~~notes ~~is presently higher than the $0~~payable.25 ~~conversion~~If ~~price~~not ~~of the Convertible Debentures~~successful, the Company ~~expects~~would ~~these~~seek ~~Convertible Debentures~~ to be ~~converted~~negotiate ~~into~~other ~~Common~~terms ~~Stock~~for ~~before~~ the ~~Convertible~~issuance ~~Debentures~~of ~~become due. However~~debt, ~~the~~and/or ~~Company~~pursue isbridge ~~presently~~financing, negotiate inwith ~~discussions~~suppliers tofor ~~obtain necessary~~a ~~financing~~reduction toof ~~satisfy~~debt ~~the~~through ~~obligations~~issuance ifof ~~the~~stock, ~~Convertible~~and seek ~~Debentures~~to ~~are presented~~raise ~~for~~equity ~~cash~~through ~~payment~~the onsale ~~their~~of ~~respective~~its ~~due~~common ~~dates~~stock. As ~~of February~~At ~~22,~~this ~~2010~~time, management ~~$250,000~~cannot ofassess the ~~Convertible~~likelihood ~~Debentures~~of ~~due~~achieving ~~March~~these 5,objectives. ~~2010~~If ~~have~~the ~~been~~Company ~~converted~~is ~~into~~unable ~~common~~to ~~stock. The~~achieve ~~Company~~these ~~also~~objectives ~~has~~or ~~$601,250~~amounts ~~in unsecured~~due ~~notes~~for ~~payable~~debentures ~~that are~~and payroll intaxes ~~default~~are ~~and~~unable ~~has accrued~~to ~~payroll~~be ~~tax~~paid, ~~obligations~~it ofmay ~~$1,782,000~~be ~~including~~forced ~~penalties~~to ~~and~~cease business ~~interest~~operations.

There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in obtaining the aforementioned operating results, financing or refinancing, converting and/or extending its notes payable. If not successful, the Company would seek to negotiate other terms for the issuance of debt, and/or pursue bridge financing, negotiate with suppliers for a reduction of debt through issuance of stock, and seek to raise equity through the sale of its common stock. At this time, management cannot assess the likelihood of achieving these objectives. If the Company is unable to achieve these objectives or is not able to file payroll tax returns and amounts due are unable to be paid it may be forced to cease business operations.7

101. BUSINESS DESCRIPTION, GOING CONCERN AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

1. BUSINESS DESCRIPTION, GOING CONCERN AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Revenue Recognition

Product revenues from the sale of software licenses are recognized when evidence of a license agreement exists, the fees are fixed and determinable, collectability is probable and vendor specific objective evidence exists to allocate the total fee to elements of the arrangements. The Company's software license agreement entitles licensees limited rights for upgrades and enhancements for the version they have licensed.

The Company requires its software product sales to be supported by a written contract or other evidence of a sale transaction, which generally consists of a customer purchase order or on-line authorization. These forms of evidence clearly indicate the selling price to the customer, shipping terms, payment terms (generally 30 days) and refund policy, if any. The selling prices of these products are fixed at the time the sale is consummated.

Deferred revenue represents revenue billed or collected for services not yet rendered.

Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events or transactions occurring through February 22, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued. The Company is not aware of any additional subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) updated topic 605 on Revenue Recognition authoritative guidance on revenue recognition that became ~~will become~~ effective for us beginning April 1, 2010, with earlier adoption permitted. Under the new guidance on arrangements that include ~~software~~ software elements, tangible products that have software components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product will no longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software- enabled products will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor specific ~~objective~~ objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to ~~separate~~ separate deliverables and allocate arrangement consideration using the relative ~~selling~~ selling price method. The new guidance includes new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition. The ~~We believe~~ adoption of this new guidance ~~will~~did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB has issued ~~new~~Accounting ~~accounting~~Standards ~~guidance~~Update (ASU) 2009-16, ~~under~~Transfers ~~SFAS~~and ~~No. 166~~Servicing (Topic 860) “- Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets ~~— an amendment of FASB Statement No~~. ~~140”.~~ ~~This~~ASU ~~standard~~2009-16 ~~has~~will ~~not yet been integrated into the Codification.~~require ~~This~~more ~~guidance~~information ~~requires~~about ~~additional~~transfers ~~disclosures~~of ~~concerning a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred~~ financial assets, including securitization transactions, eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. ~~This~~ASU ~~guidance~~2009-16 is effective ~~for~~at ~~fiscal~~the ~~years beginning~~start ~~after~~of ~~November 15,~~a ~~2009.~~reporting ~~The~~entity’s ~~Company~~first isfiscal ~~currently~~year ~~evaluating~~beginning ~~the~~after ~~impact~~November ~~that~~15, ~~the~~2009. The adoption of this new guidance ~~will~~did not have ona material ~~its~~impact ~~condensed consolidated~~on our financial statements.

11In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), “Consolidation (Topic 810).” The amendments to the consolidation requirements of Topic 810 resulting from the issuance of Statement 167 are deferred for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity (1) that has all the attributes of an investment company or (2) for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. An entity that qualifies for the deferral will continue to be assessed under the overall guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities in Subtopic 810-10 (before the Statement 167 amendments) or other applicable consolidation guidance, such as the guidance for the consolidation of partnerships in Subtopic 810- 20. The deferral is effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, which coincides with the effective date of Statement 167. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

~~STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~8

~~NOTES~~1. TOBUSINESS ~~CONDENSED~~DESCRIPTION, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~GOING ~~FINANCIAL~~CONCERN ~~STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

~~DECEMBER~~In January 312010, the FASB issued a standard pertaining to fair value disclosures (ASU No. 2010-6) that requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2, to describe the reasons for the transfers, and to disclose separately certain additional information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of Level 3 items. This standard also requires an entity to provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and Level 3 items. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the ~~AND~~Level 3 ~~2008~~disclosure of activity, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. We adopted the effective portions of this standard as of April 1, 2010. The adoption of the effective portions of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and management is currently evaluating the effect of the impact of the separate disclosure requirements of Level 3 items.

1.In February ~~BUSINESS DESCRIPTION~~2010, ~~GOING~~the ~~CONCERN~~FASB ~~AND~~issued ~~ACCOUNTING~~a ~~POLICIES~~standard that removed the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements (~~CONTINUED~~ASU No. 2010-09). Generally, this standard was effective immediately upon issuance. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance, under SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, which changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. This standard has not yet been integrated into the Codification. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance. An ongoing reassessment is required of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statementsReclassification

~~Recently~~Certain ~~Adopted~~prior ~~Accounting~~amounts ~~Pronouncements~~have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on operating income (loss) for any of the periods presented.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, ("Codification" or “ASC”) as the single source of authoritative GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities, except for the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve to update the Codification. These changes and the Codification itself do not change GAAP. This new guidance became effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is referenced, the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

1. BUSINESS DESCRIPTION, GOING CONCERN AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

In June 2008, the FASB updated the ASC Topic 815 on Derivatives and Hedging. The update provides guidance on how to determine if certain instruments (or embedded features) are considered indexed to our own stock. It requires companies to use a two-step approach to evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and settlement provisions in determining whether the instrument is considered to be indexed to its own stock and thus exempt from the application of derivative accounting. Although this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, any outstanding instrument at the date of adoption requires retrospective application of the accounting through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption. The adoption of this topic update has affected the accounting for (i) certain freestanding warrants that contain exercise price adjustment features and (ii) conversion features that also contain price adjustment features. Our warrants and conversion features with these features are no longer deemed to be indexed to the company’s own stock and are no longer classified as equity. Instead, these warrants and conversion features were reclassified as a derivative liability on April 1, 2009 as a result of this updated ASC. The fair value of the derivative liability as of April 1, 2009 was $2,109,000 and was recorded as a cumulative adjustment to our stockholders’ deficiency.

In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance, under ASC Topic 855 on Subsequent Events, which sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

2.	SENIOR SECURED ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

On March 5, 2008, the Company issued and sold debentures in a total principal amount of $1,500,000, due March 5, 2010 (the “Debentures”) to accredited investors in a private placement pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”). The Debentures are the first tranche of up to an aggregate of $4,038,000 of Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Debentures (for an aggregate cash subscription amount of up to $3,365,000). The Debentures have an effective interest rate of approximately 10% per annum. After deducting the expenses of the private placement, including prepaid interest, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $1,190,000 related to Tranche I.

During the six months ended September 30, 2008, the Company issued and sold the second tranche (“Tranche II”) of debentures in total principal amount of $1,038,000, due two years from the issuance of the securities, under the same debenture facility. The terms are substantially the same and the Company received net proceeds after deducting the expenses of the private placement of approximately $865,000 related to Tranche II.

In connection with the private placement, the investors also initially received warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to 2,583,474 shares of the Company’s common stock, which terminate five years from the closing date (the “Termination Date”) and initially had an exercise price of $1.20 per share. Based on the terms of the agreement, the Warrants may also be exercised by means of a cashless exercise. On the Termination Date, the Warrant shall be automatically exercised via cashless exercise. Based on the reduced exercise price of the warrants issued in conjunction with Tranche III (See below), the exercise price of the Warrants were reduced to $0.50 and by the terms of the original agreement, the investors were issued an additional 73,~~568~~616,~~526~~864 warrants tobased ~~obtain~~on the ~~same~~terms ~~warrant~~of ~~coverage as~~ the original Tranche ~~III~~I ~~agreement. The additional warrants that were issued had a fair value of $3,289,000~~ and ~~were recorded~~II ~~as interest expense during the nine months ended December 31, 2009~~agreements.

139

~~STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP~~2. SENIOR SECURED ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES, continued

~~NOTES~~From April TO1, ~~CONDENSED~~2009 ~~CONSOLIDATED~~through ~~FINANCIAL~~June ~~STATEMENTS~~30, 2010 , the Company issued and sold a portion of the third tranche (~~UNAUDITED~~“Tranche III”)of debentures in total principal amount of $997,680, due two years from the issuance of the securities, under the same debenture facility. In connection with the private placement, the investors also received warrants to purchase up to 3,990,720 shares of the Company’s common stock, which terminate in five years and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share. Based on the terms of the agreement, the Warrants may also be exercised by means of a cashless exercise.

~~DECEMBER~~The initial 31conversion price (“Initial Conversion Price”) of both Tranche I and Tranche II of Debentures was $0.9824 per share. The conversion price of Tranche III was $0.25. Based on the reduced conversion price of the Debentures issued in conjunction with Tranche III, ~~2009~~the conversion price of the ~~AND~~Debentures ~~2008~~from Tranches I and II were reduced to $0.25 based on the terms of the original agreement governing their issuance. To record the change in the fair value of the conversion price reduction and the warrant exercise price reduction, the Company recorded a $5,936,000 interest charge which is recorded in “Interest expense related to change in fair value of warrants and conversion features issued in association with debt” on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the 3 months ended June 30, 2009.

2. SENIOR SECURED ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES (CONTINUED)

During the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued and sold a portion of the third tranche (“Tranche III”)of debentures in total principal amount of $426,000, due two years from the issuance of the securities, under the same debenture facility. In connection with the private placement, the investors also received warrants to purchase up to 1,704,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which terminate in five years and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share. Based on the terms of the agreement, the Warrants may also be exercised by means of a cashless exercise.

The initial conversion price (“Initial Conversion Price”) of both Tranche I and Tranche II of Debentures was $0.9824 per share. The conversion price of Tranche III was $0.25. Based on the reduced conversion price of the Debentures issued in conjunction with Tranche III, the conversion price of the Debentures from Tranches I and II were reduced to $0.25 based on the terms of the original agreement governing their issuance. The modification of the conversion feature resulted in an increase in the value of the instrument of $2,647,000 and was recorded as interest expense during the nine months ended December 31, 2009.

The Company adopted the provisions of an update on ASC Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging on April 1, 2009 and the warrants and convertible features on the debentures, which were previously classified as equity, are now classified as liabilities and are recorded at fair value. The Company used a Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the value of the warrants and conversion features. The model uses sourced inputs such as interest rates, stock price and volatility, the selection of which requires management judgment and requires that the fair value of these liabilities be remeasured at the end of every reporting period with the change in fair value reported in the statement of operations.

On Tranche I and II, the gross redemption value of $2,538,000 ~~were~~was recorded net of a a discount of $2,526,000. The debt discount consisted of $423,000 related to to the original issue discount, $1,815,000 related to the allocated fair value of of the warrants, $1,323,000 relates to the beneficial conversion feature of the note ~~mitigated~~reduced by deemed interest of $1,035,000 due to the fact that the ~~proceeds~~ proceeds in some of the issuances were less than the fair value issued in the transaction. The debt discount is charged to interest expense ratably over the life of the loan. Amortization related to the debt discount on Tranche I and II totaled $1,166,079 through March 31, 2009. This amortization as well as the deemed interest is recorded as part of the cumulative adjustment in the accumulated deficit. During the ~~nine~~ three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, the Company amortized $~~951~~127,~~575~~899 and $314,885 respectively of debt discount related to Tranches I and II.

The gross proceeds of $~~426~~1,~~000~~033,680 related to Tranche III were recorded net of a discount of $~~426~~1,~~000~~033,680. The debt discount consisted of $71172,~~000~~280 related to the original issue discount, $~~636~~1,673,000 related to the fair value of the warrants ~~and~~ and $~~556~~593,000 related to the fair value of the conversion feature of the note ~~mitigated~~reduced by $~~837~~1,~~000~~404,600 of deemed interest that was expensed immediately. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, the Company amortized $122,947 and $~~135~~33,~~531~~077 respectively of debt discount related to Tranche III.

1410

~~STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP~~2. SENIOR SECURED ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES, continued

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

2. SENIOR SECURED ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES (CONTINUED)

The derivative liabilities were valued using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions.

	December 31,			Tranche III			March 31,			Tranche I & II
	June 30,			Tranche III			March 31,			Tranche I & II
	2009			Inception			2009			Inception
	2010			Inception			2010			Inception
Conversion Feature:
Risk-free interest rate		0.4732	%		0.88%-1.26	%		0.8343	%		2.0% -4.25	%
Expected volatility		~~175~~183.2958	%		154.9%-167.2	%		~~155~~176.0279	%		106.7%-112.0	%
Expected life (in years)		0.1808-1.75			2.0			0.9302-12.5000			2.0
Expected dividend yield		-			-			-			-
Warrants:
Risk-free interest rate		1.7000%-1.79	%		1.74%-2.75	%		1.65%-2.60	%		0.50%-2.50	%
Expected volatility		~~175~~183.2958	%		154.9%-167.2	%		~~155~~176.0279	%		105.1%-155.1	%
Expected life (in years)		32.1868-4.75			5.00			32.93-45.5000			5.00
Expected dividend yield		-			-			-			-

Under additional provisions of the securities purchase agreements related to such Debentures, the Company was required to meet certain revenue minimums in fiscal year 2009 which were not met. Based on not meeting the revenue minimums, the Company was required to issue to each investor, on a pro-rata basis, additional warrants (the “Additional Warrants”) to purchase up to, in the aggregate, 676,800 shares of the Company’s common stock related to Tranches I and II. The Additional Warrants are in the same form as the Warrants described above, have a term of exercise equal to five (5) years following their issuance, and shall have an exercise price of $0.01 per share. During the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010, The Company has issued 400,000 and 276,800 ~~shares~~ of penalty warrants to the debenture holders in Tranche I and Tranche II, ~~respectively~~ respectively related to this penalty. The fair value of these warrants is $124,743 based on a Black Scholes model and The Company recorded this penalty during the year ended March 31, 2009 as that is the period when the revenue shortfall occurred. The Company also failed to meet revenue minimums in Fiscal 2010 and in the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and is required to issue to certain Tranche III investors 145,800 and 21,000 penalty warrants valued at $38,000 and $4,000, respectively based on a Black Scholes model and The Company recorded $38,000 of this penalty during the year ended March 31, 2010 and $4,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as that is the period when the revenue shortfalls occurred. Tranche III has similar provisions to receive up to ~~113~~ 246,~~600~~072 similar warrants based on the existing Tranche III issuance if the Company fails to meet revenue minimums ~~for~~twelve ~~the~~month ~~year~~periods ~~ended~~through March 31, ~~2010~~ 2011.

~~The~~On ~~gross~~March ~~amount~~5, 2010, $1,125,000 of ~~maturities~~Tranche ~~under~~I ~~the~~debentures ~~Secured~~became ~~Senior~~due. We ~~Secured~~entered negotiations ~~Original~~with ~~Issue~~the ~~Discount Convertible~~Tranche ~~Debentures~~I ~~(not~~holders ~~netted~~and obtained an extension to ~~include~~May ~~the~~31, 2010 ~~debt~~by ~~discount~~issuing ~~and~~1,341,665 ~~assuming that~~shares ~~the~~of ~~debenture~~our iscommon ~~not~~stock ~~converted~~as ~~into~~an extension fee. The common stock) iswas valued at $~~3,038,000~~0.29 and we recorded $~~426~~389,~~000~~082 ~~for~~related to this issuance as interest expense in the year ended ~~December~~March 31, 2010. ~~and~~Subsequent ~~2011~~to June 30, 2010, $562,500 was paid to the holders of the debentures that became ~~respectively~~due on May 31, 2010 and we are in the process of raising additional capital through the issuance of additional debentures or by cash flows from operations to settle the remaining balance.

15On June 30, 2010, $648,000 of Tranche II debentures became due. We have not yet settled these debentures and are presently negotiating an extension or another method of settlement.

~~STATMON~~The gross ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~amount ~~CORP.~~of ~~AND~~maturities ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~under the Secured Senior Secured Original Issue Discount Convertible Debentures (not netted to include the debt discount and assuming that the debenture is not converted into common stock) is $2,491,500 and $669,180 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~11

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

3.	NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable at June 30, 2010 and 2009 consist of the following:

		December 31, 2009
		As of
		(unaudited)		March 31, 2009
		June 30, 2010		March 31, 2010
Notes Payable - Delis - related party	[a]	$	200,000	$	200,000
Notes Payable - various	[b]		401,250		401,250
Senior Subordinated Notes Payable - Thieme Consulting, Inc. - related party	[c]		250,000		250,000
Senior Subordinated Notes Payable - Thieme	[c]		250,000		250,000
Senior Subordinated Notes Payable, net of debt discount of $19,333 and $53,856, respectively	[d]		230,667		196,144
Consulting, Inc. - related party
		$	1,081,917	$	1,047,394
Senior Subordinated Notes Payable, net of debt discount of $0 and $8,034, respectively	[d]		250,000		241,966
Less: Current Maturities			1,081,917		601,250
Short-Term Notes Payable		$	1,101,250	$	1,093,216
Long-Term Notes Payable		$	-	$	446,144

[a] On April 27, 2007, the Company sold a unit consisting of (i) a $200,000 principal amount secured promissory note bearing interest at 10% per annum and due 180 days from the date of issuance, (ii) 150,000 shares of common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock exercisable at a price of $1.00 per share for a term of five years. This note matured on October 24, 2007. ~~Per~~ ~~the~~Since ~~default terms of~~ the ~~note, since the~~ Company did not repay the note by the maturity date, itper the default terms of the note, the Company issued an additional 100,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share with a term of five years as consideration for aan ~~new~~extension ~~note with a maturity~~ of ~~October 24, 2008. The Company is negotiating a new note or conversion to shares of common stock that would supersede such new note agreement subject approval from~~ the ~~majority~~due ofdate ~~the secured debenture holders. There can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain a new note or approval from the majority~~ of the ~~debenture holders. This~~ note isto ~~secured~~October by24, ~~a second lien on all of the assets of the Company~~2008.

~~[b] These~~The ~~units~~Company ~~generally~~is ~~consisted~~negotiating an extension ofor ~~(i)~~conversion ato ~~promissory~~shares ~~note~~of ~~bearing interest generally at~~common ~~10%~~stock ~~per~~that ~~annum,~~would ~~(ii)~~supersede asuch ~~share~~extension ofagreement ~~the~~subject ~~Company’s~~to ~~common~~approval ~~stock~~from ~~and~~the majority ~~(iii)~~of ~~three~~the ~~or five-year~~secured ~~warrant~~debenture toholders. There ~~purchase~~can ~~shares~~be ofno ~~common~~assurance ~~stock~~that it atwill anbe ~~exercise~~able ~~price between~~to ~~$1.00~~obtain ~~and~~such ~~$2.00~~an ~~per~~extension ~~share. The~~or ~~total~~approval ~~principal~~from ~~amount~~the majority of the ~~these~~debenture ~~notes~~holders. This note is ~~$401,250~~secured ~~and~~by ~~represents~~a ~~eight~~second ~~notes~~lien ~~with~~on ~~initial~~all ~~maturity~~of ~~dates~~the ~~between~~assets ~~November~~of ~~19,~~the ~~2002 and October 21, 2008~~Company.

~~At December~~[b] ~~31,~~These ~~2009,~~Units ~~all~~generally ofconsisted ~~these notes are in default, plus interest~~ of ~~$241,376. Upon~~(i) ~~default,~~a ~~most~~promissory ~~notes~~note ~~accrue~~bearing interest generally at 1510% per annum, ~~and~~(ii) ~~provide~~a ~~for~~share of the ~~issuance~~ ofCompany’s ~~monthly~~common ~~warrants,~~stock ~~exercisable~~and at(iii) ~~the~~three ~~same~~or ~~price~~five-year aswarrant ~~the~~to ~~original warrants~~purchase ~~granted~~shares ~~with~~of ~~the~~common ~~unit,~~stock asat aan ~~penalty~~exercise ~~until~~price ~~the~~between ~~repayment~~$1.00 ofand ~~the~~$2.00 ~~notes~~per ~~in full~~share. The ~~Company~~total ~~accrued~~amount ~~$58,763~~ of ~~interest~~these ~~and~~notes ~~granted~~is ~~67,500 penalty warrants, valued at~~ $10401,~~800~~250 ~~related~~and torepresents ~~such~~eight notes ~~during~~with ~~the~~initial ~~nine~~maturity ~~months~~dates ~~ended December~~between 31November 19, ~~2009.~~2002 ~~The~~and ~~Company~~October ~~continues to grant 7~~21,~~500~~ ~~penalty warrants per month related to such notes in default until the notes are repaid~~2008.

~~[c]~~At AnJune ~~existing~~30, ~~note~~2010, inall ~~the~~these ~~amount~~notes ofare ~~$250~~in default,~~000~~ ~~has~~plus ~~matured~~interest ~~and~~of ~~on March 5~~$256,832. ~~2008~~Upon default, ~~the Company~~most ~~entered~~notes ~~into~~accrue ainterest ~~new~~at ~~promissory~~15% ~~note~~per ~~with~~annum ~~Thieme~~and ~~Consulting,~~provide ~~Inc.~~ for the ~~$250,000. This~~issuance ~~new~~of ~~note~~monthly iswarrants, ~~subordinated~~exercisable toat the ~~Debentures~~same ~~described in~~price ~~Note~~as 2the ~~above. The~~original warrants ~~new~~granted ~~note~~with ~~has~~the aunit, ~~maturity~~as ~~date~~a ofpenalty ~~June~~until 4,the ~~2010~~repayment ~~and bears~~of ~~interest~~the atnotes ~~10% per annum~~in full. In The ~~consideration~~Company ~~for~~accrued ~~entering~~$11,338 ~~into the~~of ~~new~~interest ~~note~~ and ~~subordinating~~granted ~~its~~22,500 ~~first~~penalty warrants, ~~security~~valued ~~position~~at $2,985 ~~the~~related ~~Company~~to ~~repaid all~~such ofnotes during the ~~accrued~~three ~~interest~~months ~~due~~ended June on30, ~~the~~2010. The ~~October~~Company ~~2001~~will ~~notes~~continue ofto ~~$243~~grant 7,~~896.~~500 ~~For~~penalty ~~the~~warrants ~~nine~~per ~~months~~month ~~ended~~related ~~December~~to ~~31,~~such ~~2009,~~notes ~~the~~in ~~Company~~default ~~accrued~~until ~~$18,750~~the ofnotes ~~interest due~~are ~~on this note~~repaid.

16[c] An existing note in the amount of $250,000 matured and on March 5, 2008, the Company entered into a new promissory note with Thieme Consulting, Inc. for $250,000. This new note is subordinated to the Debentures described in Note 5 above. The new note had a maturity date of June 4, 2010 and bears interest at 10% per annum. The Company is presently in discussions to extend the due date of the note. In consideration for entering into the new note and subordinating its first security position, the Company repaid all of the accrued interest due on the October 2001 notes of $243,896. At June 30, 2010, the Company has accrued $58,374 of interest due on this note.

~~STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~12

3. NOTES TOPAYABLE, ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~continued

~~DECEMBER~~[d] An existing note in the amount of $250,000 matured and on March 5, 2008, the Company entered into a new promissory note with a secured promissory note holder. This new note is subordinated to the notes in Note 5 and [c] above. The new note had a maturity date of June 4, 2010 and bears interest at 10% per annum. The Company is presently in discussions to extend the due date of the note. In consideration for entering into the new note, the Company converted all of the accrued interest due on the August 2004 note of $125,445 into shares of restricted common stock at $1.00 per share, issued 703,871 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for 1,759,676 warrants and issued a new warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock exercisable for a five-year term at $1.20 per share which expire on March 5, 2013. The fair value of the instruments issued in the exchange agreement approximated the instruments that were exchanged for and no gain or loss was recorded related to this transaction during the year ended March 31, 2008. During the year ended March 31, 2009 ~~AND~~, ~~2008~~the Company issued 22,917 shares of common stock valued at $12,147 in lieu of interest through February 2009. On October 20, 2009, the Company issued 133,973 shares of common stock valued at $0.25 per share in lieu of cash interest payments for $15,959 of accrued interest on the note through October 20, 2009 as well as to prepay $17,534 for future interest on the note through maturity.

34. ~~NOTES~~STOCKHOLDERS’ ~~PAYABLE (CONTINUED)~~EQUITY

~~[d]~~During ~~An existing~~the ~~note~~three inmonths ~~the~~ended ~~amount~~June of30, ~~$250~~2010,~~000~~ ~~had~~the ~~matured~~Company ~~and~~issued ~~on March 5~~1, ~~2008~~800,000 ~~the Company~~shares ~~entered~~of ~~into~~common astock ~~new~~valued ~~promissory~~at ~~note~~$0.27 ~~with~~for afinancial ~~secured~~advisory ~~promissory~~services. ~~note~~The ~~holder for~~term ~~$250,000. This~~of ~~new~~the ~~note~~agreement is ~~subordinated~~for toone ~~the~~year ~~notes~~beginning inApril ~~Note~~15, 2 2010 and ~~[c]~~the ~~above.~~Company ~~The~~recorded ~~new~~the ~~note~~fair ~~has~~value aof ~~maturity~~the ~~date~~common ofstock ~~June~~issued 4,for ~~2010~~future ~~and~~consulting ~~bears interest~~services atas ~~10%~~a ~~per~~prepaid ~~annum. In~~expense ~~consideration~~and ~~for~~will ~~entering~~be ~~into~~recording the ~~new note,~~expense over the ~~Company~~life ~~converted all~~ of the ~~accrued~~contract. ~~interest~~The ~~due~~Company onalso ~~the~~issued ~~August 2004 note of $125~~1,~~445~~341,665 ~~into~~ shares of ~~restricted~~ common stock valued at $10.0029 ~~per~~as ~~share, issued~~an ~~703,871~~extension ~~shares~~fee ofto ~~restricted~~Tranche ~~common~~I ~~stock~~holders into ~~exchange~~extend ~~for~~the ~~1,759,676 warrants~~due ~~and~~date ~~issued~~of atheir ~~new~~debentures ~~warrant~~from toMarch ~~purchase 250~~5,~~000~~ ~~shares~~2010 ofto ~~common~~May ~~stock exercisable~~31, ~~for a five-year term at $1~~2010.20 ~~per~~We ~~share,~~recorded ~~which~~this ~~warrant~~expense ~~expires~~as ~~on March~~interest 5,expense ~~2013. For~~during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009, the Company accrued $18,750 of interest due on this note~~2010. On ~~October~~The ~~20, 2009, the~~ Company also issued ~~133~~16,~~973~~000 shares of common stock ~~valued~~to ata ~~$0.25~~Tranche ~~per share~~II indebenture ~~lieu~~holder ofupon ~~cash~~the ~~interest~~exercise ~~payments for $15,959~~ of ~~accrued interest on the note through October 20, 2009 as well as to prepay~~ $~~17,534~~0.01 ~~for~~penalty ~~future interest on the note through maturity~~warrants.

45. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

[a] ~~Legal~~ ~~Proceedings. On~~Payroll Taxes - ~~May~~During ~~17,~~the ~~2007,~~years an2001 ~~action~~through ~~was~~2008, ~~filed~~The inCompany ~~Los~~considered ~~Angeles~~its ~~Superior~~Chief ~~Court~~Executive ~~for~~Officer ~~breach of contract~~ and ~~similar~~its ~~causes~~Chief ofTechnology ~~action~~Officer ~~by the Epstein Family Trust against the Company in relation~~ to ~~two~~be ~~outstanding~~consultants ~~promissory~~of ~~notes issued by~~ the Company ~~totaling~~rather ~~$75,000~~than ~~($25~~employees,~~000~~ ~~and~~as ~~$50,000) plus~~a ~~accrued~~result ~~interest.~~of ~~The~~the ~~Epstein Family Trust is seeking attorney~~Company’s ~~fees and~~ ~~costs~~non-compliance inwith ~~addition to~~ the ~~principal~~terms ~~and~~of ~~interest. These~~their ~~notes~~original ~~were guaranteed~~employment ~~by Mr~~agreements. ~~Geoffrey~~If ~~Talbot,~~ the Chief ~~Company's~~Executive ~~CEO,~~Officer ~~for up to $25,000,~~ and ~~therefore~~ ~~Mr.~~the ~~Talbot~~Chief ~~was~~Technology ~~joined~~Officer inwere ~~the~~classified ~~legal action~~ as ~~a third-party~~ ~~defendant. The~~employees ~~case~~during ~~number is BC 371 276. The parties have reached a settlement agreement where~~ the ~~plaintiff~~above ~~has agreed to convert all principal and interest into shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share effective February 28~~period, ~~2008 where~~ the Company ~~will~~would ~~pay~~have ~~legal~~been ~~fees~~required ~~of approximately $12,000~~ to withhold ~~plaintiff~~and ~~which~~remit ispayroll ~~still~~taxes ~~outstanding.~~to ~~This~~the ~~obligation~~respective ~~is recorded as accounts~~taxing ~~payable at December 31, 2009~~authorities.

On December 18, 2008 Ira J. Gaines filed an action for breach of contract and unjust enrichment against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, Maricopa County, case number CV2008-032043. The action is based on a promissory note and seeks a principal balance of $145,200 plus additional accrued interest, costs and attorneys' fees totaling $215,996. The settlement called for two payments of $5,000 to be applied against accrued interest, first on dismissal and second on November 1, 2009. The remainder of the debt was to be paid in 24 equal payments of $12,183 beginning June 1, 2011. The Company is in default of the payment plan because it has not made its November 1, 2009 payment. As provided for in the settlement agreement, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s stock at $0.50 per share valued at $15,000 based on a Black–Scholes model. This matter has been finalized and the first payment made on May 18, 2009. This obligation is recorded as notes payable and accrued interest at December 31, 2009.

[b] Product Liability Insurance - The manufacture and sale of the Company’s products involve the risk of product liability claims. It does not carry product liability insurance. Pursuant to its software licensing agreements and contracts, the Company makes every effort to limit any product liability to the dollar value of the transaction, however, a successful claim brought against it could require it to pay substantial damages and result in harm to its business reputation, remove its products from the market or otherwise adversely affect its business and operations.

STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

[c] Payroll Taxes The Company considers its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Technology Officer to be consultants of the Company rather than employees, as a result of the Company’s non compliance with the terms of their original employment agreements. If the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Technology Officer were classified as employees, the Company would be required to withhold and remit payroll taxes to the respective taxing authorities.

This position may be subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service and other state and local taxing authorities, which, upon review, could result in an unfavorable outcome if it is determined that such individuals’ compensation should have been reported on the basis of an employee rather than a consultant.

The Company has recorded charges of approximately $942,000 for additional compensation (including penalties and interest) on behalf of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Technology Officer should the Company be challenged by the taxing authorities and it is determined their position is without merit. 13

In addition, the Company is delinquent in filing certain of its payroll returns (including the remittance of taxes) totaling approximately $585,000 and related penalties and interest approximated $257,000 (for other employees), computed through December 31, 20095. ~~The Company~~ ~~plans~~COMMITMENTS toAND ~~file these tax returns before March 31~~CONTINGENCIES, 2010 and expects to have these outstanding amounts paid or have an agreement in place to pay these amounts by June 30, 2010. However, should such returns not be filed and/or payments not remitted, the Company will be subject to additional interest and penalties by the taxing authorities.continued

5.The Company ~~FAIR~~has ~~VALUE~~recorded ~~MEASUREMENTS~~charges of approximately $1,012,000 for additional compensation (including penalties and interest) on behalf of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Technology Officer should the Company be challenged by the taxing authorities and it is determined their position is without merit.

In addition, the Company was delinquent in filing certain of its payroll returns (including the remittance of taxes) totaling approximately $837,000 and related penalties and interest approximated $259,000 computed through June 30, 2010. The Company filed these tax returns on July 7, 2010, is current with its payroll tax filing obligations and expects to have an agreement in place to pay these amounts as soon as possible. Based on the results of a review of these tax filings, the Company may be subject to additional interest and penalties.

6.	FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

On April 1, 2008, the Company implemented ASC 850 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures which provides a single definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosures concerning fair value and clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the measurement date and emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and not an entity-specific measurement.

It also established the following hierarchy used in fair value measurements and expanded the required disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value:

•

Level 1 – Inputs use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

•

Level 2 – Inputs use other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets as well as other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

•

Level 3 – Inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are available in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the related asset or liability.

In instances where inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels in the above fair value hierarchy, fair value measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the valuation. The Company’s assessment of the significance of particular inputs to these fair measurements requires judgment and considers factors specific to each asset or liability.

1814

~~STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP~~6. ~~AND~~FAIR ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~VALUE MEASUREMENTS, continued

~~NOTES~~Liabilities TOmeasured ~~CONDENSED~~at ~~CONSOLIDATED~~fair ~~FINANCIAL~~value ~~STATEMENTS~~on a ~~(UNAUDITED)~~recurring basis at June 30, 2010 are as follows:

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at June 30, 2010
Conversion Features	$	-	$	-	$	599,000	$	599,000
Warrant liability	$	-	$	-	$	1,969,000	$	1,969,000
	$	-	$	-	$	2,568,000	$	2,568,000

5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)

Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2009 are as follows:

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at December 31, 2009
Conversion Features	$	-	$	-	$	1,168,000	$	1,168,000
Warrant liability	$	-	$	-	$	2,593,000	$	2,593,000
	$	-	$	-	$	3,761,000	$	3,761,000

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Our Level 3 liabilities consist of derivative liabilities associated with the debentures and warrants that contain exercise price reset provisions.

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs during the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010.

	Conversion			Warrant
	Feature			Liability			Total
Balance April, 1, 2009	$	904,000		$	1,225,000		$	2,129,000
Balance April, 1, 2010	$	1,445,000		$	2,440,000		$	3,885,000
Total realized/unrealized (gains) or losses
Included in other income (expense)		(2987,~~924,~~000	)		(2637,~~664,~~000	)		(51,~~588~~624,000	)
Included in stockholder's equity		-			-			-
Purchases, issuances or settlements		3141,~~188,~~000			4166,~~032,~~000			7307,~~220,~~000
Transfers in and /or out of Level 3		-			-			-
Balance December 31, 2009	$	1,168,000		$	2,593,000		$	3,761,000
Balance June 30, 2010	$	599,000		$	1,969,000		$	2,568,000

The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for purposes of risk management nor speculation. However, the Company has entered into agreements whose terms require that we classify certain freestanding warrants and embedded conversion features as liabilities for accounting purposes. Our derivatives are classified as derivative liabilities in short-term liabilities on the balance sheet and the change in their fair value is recorded in other (income) expense on the statement of operations.

67. NET INCOME/LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net income/loss per share is computed by dividing the net income/loss applicable to ~~common~~ common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income/loss per share reflects potential dilution of securities by adding other potential common shares, including stock warrants and shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible notes payable, to the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for a period, if dilutive.

The Company’s computation of weighted average per share includes ~~676~~667,~~800~~600 and 0 shares exercisable at $0.01 per share at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively.

1915

~~STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP~~7. NET ~~AND~~INCOME/LOSS ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~PER SHARE, continued

~~NOTES~~The following TOtable ~~CONDENSED~~sets ~~CONSOLIDATED~~forth ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS~~components used in the computation of basic and ~~(UNAUDITED)~~diluted income per share:

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

	For the Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010*			2009**
Numerator:
Net Income/(Loss)	$	1,188,829		$	(3,566,956	)
Amortization of debt discount due to conversion features and related warrants		284,595			-
(Gain)/Loss on change in fair value of conversion features		(987,000	)		-
Net Income/(Loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	486,424		$	(3,566,956	)

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic		29,066,610			23,813,628
Common shares issued upon conversion of debentures		12,642,720			-
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted		41,709,330			23,813,628

Net Income/(Loss) per share - Basic	$	0.04		$	(0.15	)
Net Income/(Loss) per share - Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.15	)

6.* ~~NET~~Potential ~~LOSS~~common ~~PER~~shares ~~SHARE~~of ~~(CONTINUED)~~13,426,756 were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock during the period.

~~Securities~~** ~~that~~Potential ~~could~~common ~~potentially~~shares ~~dilute basic earnings per share (“EPS”), that were outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were not included in the computation~~ of ~~diluted EPS because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for that period. As of December 31~~26, ~~2009~~915,198 ~~The Company has~~ (outstanding warrants that can be exercised into 1415,~~778~~305,~~698~~198 shares of common stock and outstanding ~~convertible~~ convertible debentures that can converted into 11,~~756~~610,000 shares of common stock~~. As~~) ofwere excluded ~~December~~from ~~31, 2008,~~ the ~~Company~~computation ~~had outstanding warrants to purchase 8,828,646 shares~~ of ~~common~~diluted ~~stock~~earnings ~~and~~per ~~outstanding~~share ~~convertible~~as ~~debentures~~their ~~that could have~~inclusion ~~been~~would ~~converted~~be ~~into 2,583,474 shares of common stock~~anti-dilutive.

78. CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION

The Company sold a substantial portion of its product and services to ~~three customers~~two customers during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009. Sales to these customers were approximately 5475%~~, 14%~~ and 1215% of total sales, respectively ~~for~~ ~~the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 64%, 0% and 0% of total sales, respectively~~ for the ~~nine months ended December 31, 2008. Sales to~~ ~~these customers was approximately 40%, 34% and 0% of total sales, respectively for the~~ three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~47%,~~ 0% and 073% of total sales, respectively for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009.

Accounts receivable balance for these ~~three~~ customers was approximately $~~112~~554,000, $0 and $0105, 400, respectively at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~none~~$0 ofand ~~the~~$58,000, ~~customers~~respectively ~~had a balance~~ at ~~December~~ ~~31,~~June ~~2008~~30, ~~respectively~~ 2009.

89. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Research and development expenditures were approximately $~~953~~325,000 and $1355,~~086,~~000 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008, respectively. Research and development expenditures were approximately $287,000 and $368,000 for the three months ended December 31,~~ 2009 ~~and 2008~~, respectively.

~~9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS~~16

~~From January~~10. 1,SUBSEQUENT 2010 through February 22, 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock related to the conversion of $250,000 of debentures that are due in March 2010 and issued 144,000 shares of common stock related to the conversion of $36,000 of debentures that are due in June 2011.EVENTS

In ~~January~~ July 2010, the Company, ~~the Company~~ issued and sold debentures in a total principal amount of $66690,000, due two years from the date of closing to an accredited ~~investors~~investor in a private placement pursuant to a securities purchase agreement. In connection with the private placement, the investor also received warrants to purchase up to 2,760,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which terminate in five years and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The debentures are part of Tranche III financing ~~(See~~and ~~Note~~are from an 2)existing debenture holder for the explicit purpose of paying down the Tranche I debentures. The Company received net proceeds of $55575,000.

20On March 5, 2010, $1,125,000 of Tranche I debentures became due. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, $578,312 ($562,500 of principal and $15,812 of interest) was paid to the Tranche I holders and we are in the process of raising additional capital through the issuance of additional debentures or by cash flows from operations to settle the remaining balance.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “will,” “plan,” “future,” “continue,” and other expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and that do not relate to historical matters identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations or forecasts of future events, can be affected by inaccurate assumptions, and are subject to various business risks and known and unknown uncertainties, a number of which are beyond our control. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this document, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. A wide variety of factors could cause or contribute to such differences and could adversely impact revenues, profitability, cash flows and capital needs. There can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this document will, in fact, transpire or prove to be accurate.

Factors that could cause or contribute to our actual results differing materially from those discussed herein or for our stock price to be adversely affected include, but are not limited to: (i) our limited operating history; (ii) our history of net losses and inability to achieve or maintain profitability; (iii) our auditors’ expression of a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern; (iv) ~~Concentration~~concentration of ~~Our~~our ~~Business~~business in ~~One~~one ~~Customer~~customer; (v) our need for additional capital and the uncertainty of obtaining it; (vi) substantially all of our assets are pledged to secure our indebtedness; (vii) the possibility of undetected errors or failures in our software; (viii) the risk of products liability claims; (ix) industry resistance to change; (x) fluctuations in our quarterly operating results; (xi) ~~failure~~the inability to settle our outstanding payroll obligations could harm our business (xii) failure to manage growth; (~~xii~~xiii) dependence on Microsoft Windows platform; (~~xiii~~xiv) our ability to keep pace with rapidly changing technologies; (~~xiv~~xv) our ability to compete effectively; (xvxvi) difficulties in integrating businesses, products and technologies that we may acquire; (~~xvi~~xvii) loss of key personnel; (~~xvii~~xviii) enactment of new laws or changes in government regulations could adversely affect our business; (~~xviii~~xix) our products could infringe on the intellectual property rights of others; (~~xix~~xx) our inability to obtain patent and copyright protection for our technology or misappropriation of our software and intellectual property; (xxxxi) our failure to successfully introduce new products; (~~xxi~~xxii) obsolescence of our technologies; (~~xxii~~xxiii) our ability to attract customers who will embrace our new products and technologies; (~~xxiii~~xxiv) our stock price is likely to be highly volatile; (~~xxiv~~xxv) our common stock is considered a penny stock and is considered to be a high-risk investment and subject to restrictions on marketability; (~~xxv~~xxvi) the risk that the Company may be ineligible for quotation by a NASD member due to the Company having been late on two filings with the SEC, (~~xxvi~~xxvii) control by certain stockholders~~; and (xxvii) our increasing dependence on a single customer~~. For a more detailed description of these and other cautionary factors that may affect our future results, please refer to our Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2009~~2010 filed with the SEC.

Recent Developments for the Company

Statmon Technologies Corp. is a wireless and fiber infrastructure network management solution provider. “Axess”, our proprietary flagship software application, and our supporting integration products are deployed in telecommunications, media broadcast, building management and navigation aid transmission networks to optimize operations and ensure they remain healthy and fully operational 24/7. A typical infrastructure network comprises a network operations center or master control plus a network of remote transmission sites that incorporate a wide range of communication devices, building, facilities management and environmental control systems.

The Statmon Platform is designed to self heal or preempt transmission failure by automating the integration of all the different devices and disparate technologies under a single umbrella control system and permit manual corrective action at the network operations center or from any connected computer including a wireless device such as a laptop or Blackberry. A tiered severity level alarm system at every site, down to the device level, reports back to the network operations center logging automated adjustments or permitting manual adjustment or corrective action without a field technician having to physically travel to the network operations center facility or remote site. Any authorized operator can drill down through the Axess software screens to observe exactly what is taking place with an individual device or system at a remote site and make further adjustments as required.

The optimization of network performance and the preemption of failure eliminates or minimizes network or individual site malfunction or downtime. Transmission downtime typically has a mission critical or direct financial impact on the customers’ top line revenue generation, operating profit and customer satisfaction. Investment payback periods relative to the purchase cost of the Statmon Platform compared to the operators loss of revenue or costs of being “off the air” typically make the return of investment very attractive. Advertisers do not pay for commercials that do not go to air and cell phone users cannot make calls or download video when a base station or cell site is off the air. Geographically, the Statmon Platform streamlines the network engineering and remote site field trips and maintenance process, reducing operating and outsourcing costs and facilitating the reallocation of resources. The Statmon Platform can dramatically facilitate the green policies being implemented by all levels of corporate and government entities. Architecturally designed as a universal “Manager of Technologies” application or platform, wide scale network operations, regardless of disparate equipment brands or incompatible technologies deployed at a network operations center or remote site, can automatically interact with each other while being managed from a single point of control or “dashboard” style computer screen. In real time, a proactive alarm system reports to a network operations center or designated wireless device for appropriate attention or action. Adjusting the HVAC, the health of the uninterrupted power supply and diesel generator and the level of the fuel tank, as well as disaster recovery, emergency power management, and redundancy are all proactive management capabilities of the Statmon Platform. The Statmon Platform will keep remote sites operating even when part or all of the entire network are down, automatically bringing the remote back on line when network operations are restored.

Telecommunications infrastructure and high speed networks in both developed and developing countries around the world are being aggressively upgraded to meet the growing subscriber demand for communication services. In developing countries, wireless networks provide an affordable alternative to the more expensive hardwire or landline infrastructure. Notable are the third generation, or 3G, wireless and infrastructure transmission networks which are being upgraded to handle the rapid traffic increase, wireless broadband and convergence of digital media delivery and additional data services for the wireless and IPTV fiber markets. Cable systems are offering telecommunication and broadband services to their customers and upgrading their networks including deploying Statmon’s proprietary “Accurate” Local People Meter monitoring platform which interfaces with directly with Nielsen. Statmon’s unique radio frequency background and know how in the mainstream media broadcast industry places us in a strategic position to provide high end solutions for the enhanced telecommunications networks offering video and enriched multimedia content.

The marketing and distribution of our products is primarily facilitated by third party sales channel partners, value added resellers, black label and original equipment manufacturer collaborations (“Channel Partners” or “Strategic Partners”). Channel Partners are developed and managed by an internal business development team and supported by a direct sales and engineering support force. We have a history as an innovative technology leader for remote site facilities management, transmission remote control and monitoring in the traditional television, radio, satellite and cable broadcast industries. The traditional network television market is undergoing a resurgence of activity and reformatting as the digital and high definition (“HD”) television, cable and satellite delivery systems realign their operating and business models post the analog switch off including offering additional digital channels that individually focus on HD programming, continuous news coverage and weather reporting, sports and special interest coverage. Now that analog broadcasting has officially been turned off the digital HD network broadcast operations are being streamlined or rationalized with central casting, regional hubs and stations and unmanned remote site transmission operations. The traditional radio markets are retrofitting to multi band digital transmission in order to remain competitive with satellite radio, mobile TV, multimedia and music content direct to cell phone or mobile device offerings for automobiles, trucks, public transport and the military.

We successfully entered the telecom wireless infrastructure vertical market via a contract with the Qualcomm wholly owned subsidiary, FLO TV to deploy our Axess software and related integration products for the control and monitoring of their national mobile TV network rollout. This is the largest transmission network of its type in the world based on the Qualcomm developed “FLO” encoding and compression technology for multiple channels of live TV and multimedia content directly to cell phone and mobile wireless devices.

At this point, FLO TV is providing the “FLO” mobile TV and multimedia platform (the “FLO Platform”) directly to the Verizon and AT&T cellular subscriber base as well as FLO TV’s portable touchscreen television. From the FLO TV network operations center in San Diego, our Platform controls and manages all the remote sites throughout the USA to optimize the FLO Platform transmission performance and customer satisfaction. We anticipate that the FLO mobile TV platform will be adopted by additional wireless operators around the world, although we can offer no assurance in this regard.

Under our agreement with FLO TV we are licensing our Axess software and supplying interface components for the FLO TV San Diego Network Operation Center and the national rollout of wireless transmission sites. Under such agreement, Qualcomm and/or FLO TV periodically issue purchase orders to us. From ~~September~~inception ~~7, 2006~~ to ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010, Qualcomm and/or FLO TV has jointly purchased $7,~~069~~702,~~969~~009 from us. The FLO agreement is ~~dated~~ dated September 7, 2006 and specifies no minimum or maximum number of purchase ~~orders~~ orders and is for an initial term of three years with extensions predicated on ~~the~~ the annual support agreements remaining current. The number of FLO TV sites is expected to increase to as many as 1,200 remote as the network expands. We also provide support and maintenance to FLO TV renewable on an annual basis.

We have commenced penetrating and with adequate operating capital are poised to pursue rapid expansion into additional vertical markets, including the wireless telecommunications (cell phone), mobile TV, IPTV over fiber networks, microwave telecommunications, multimedia, gaming, grid and emergency power management, government infrastructure management, homeland security, military communications, surveillance and other markets where centrally controlled network management, embedded industrial systems and wide scale remote monitoring and control solutions are being implemented.

We believe our products have broad application in the wireless, landline and fiber segments of the telecommunications industries providing network management, alarm monitoring and remote site control, transmission, buildings and facilities management solutions for many of the new planned networks, as well as the upgrades and wide scale infrastructure enhancements. In developing countries, wireless infrastructure networks are being developed as viable alternatives to wired networks. Economic remote site management is vital for viable carrier operations.

We expect the wireless and infrastructure markets to experience sustained growth over the next ten to twenty years as the carriers and infrastructure service providers compete to provide superior and additional wide-ranging services, including enriched video and high quality content to mobile devices, wireless broadband and other related mobile data delivery services customers expect. We believe that our background in the mainstream broadcast transmission industry at the highest TV and radio network levels plus our three year involvement with wireless technology leader Qualcomm places us in a credible position to satisfy the operational needs of the mainstream telecommunications, wireless and infrastructure providers for RF and content delivery, as well as overall communications network, building and remote site management and control.

Our significant clients in the present and in the past include Qualcomm - FLO TV; General Electric – NBC Universal & Telemundo Television Networks; CBS Corporation Television and Radio Networks; The Walt Disney Company - ABC Television and Radio Networks; Turner Broadcast Systems; Cox Communications; Belo Corp. Television; Australian Government owned Air Services of Australia (the Australian equivalent to the FAA); Tribune Company Television; and Univision Communications Television and Radio Network. Some of our current sales channel and integration partners include Sealevel Systems, InfraCell, Harris Broadcast, Pixelmetrix, Nautel Navigation, BTS Ireland and Sound Broadcast Services, Ltd.20

Our significant clients in the present and in the past include Qualcomm - FLO TV; General Electric – NBC Universal & Telemundo Television Networks; CBS Corporation Television and Radio Networks; The Walt Disney Company - ABC Television and Radio Networks; News Corp – Fox Television; Turner Broadcast Systems; Cox Communications; Belo Corp. Television; Australian Government owned Air Services of Australia (the Australian equivalent to the FAA); Tribune Company Television; and Univision Communications Television and Radio Network. Some of our current sales channel and integration partners include Sealevel Systems, InfraCell, Harris Broadcast, Pixelmetrix, Nautel Navigation, BTS Ireland and Sound Broadcast Services, Ltd.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet debt nor did we have any transactions, arrangements, obligations (including contingent obligations) or other relationships with any unconsolidated entities or other persons that may have material current or future effect on financial conditions, changes in the financial conditions, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources, or significant components of revenue or expenses.

For the Three Months Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009

Results From Operations

Revenues - Revenues were $~~791~~1,~~646~~164,276 and $~~444~~530,~~933~~692 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. The increase in revenues of approximately $~~347~~634,000 is primarily due to ~~increased~~an approximately $875,000 national monitoring solution in 2010 mitigated by a decrease in revenues ~~associated~~of approximately $213,000 associated with FLO TV due to the timing of the staggered national rollout of their high-powered wireless transmission sites. Revenues due to the national monitoring solution represented 75% and 0% of the revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Revenues to FLO TV were 4015% and 4773% for the three months ended ~~December~~ 31June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively

Cost of Sales - Cost of sales were $6168,~~863~~115 and $7861,~~122~~804 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. Overall gross profit percentage increased to 9294% in the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 compared to 8288% in ~~the~~ the comparable prior year period due to an increase, as a percentage of sales, in in software sales and support services during the quarter.

24Selling, General and Administrative Expenses - Selling, general and administrative expenses were $922,933 and $1,042,026 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decrease of approximately $126,000. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is attributed to a decrease in payroll costs of approximately $165,000 which is primarily based on headcount reductions.

~~Selling, General~~Other ~~and~~Income/(Expense ~~Administrative Expenses~~ )- ~~Selling,~~Other ~~general~~Income/(Expense) ~~and~~was ~~administrative expenses were~~ $~~871~~1,~~963~~015,601 ~~and~~of income and $12,~~046~~993,~~743~~818 of expense for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~ 2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively,. The ~~a decrease of~~ approximately $~~175~~4,009,000~~. The~~ income increase can be ~~decrease~~attributed to the reduction in ~~selling,~~interest ~~general~~expense related to change in fair value of warrants and ~~administrative~~conversion ~~expenses~~features isgranted ~~attributed~~for toratchet aprovisions of $5,936,000 ~~decrease~~which was due to the expense that we incurred in ~~payroll~~the ~~costs~~three ofmonths ~~approximately~~ended ~~$130~~June 30,~~000~~ 2009 ~~which~~related isto ~~primarily~~the ~~based~~additional onwarrants and conversion features that we were ~~headcount~~required ~~reductions~~to issue due to repricing provisions in our debenture agreements.

~~Other~~We ~~Expense~~recorded -a ~~Other~~gain ~~Expense~~on ~~was~~a change in the fair value of derivatives of $~~210~~1,~~858~~624,000 and $~~629~~4,~~149~~260,000 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. ~~The~~This ~~approximately $418,000~~gain ~~decrease~~is ~~can~~primarily bedue ~~attributed~~ to the ~~adoption~~fact ofthat ~~new~~our ~~accounting rules in~~stock ~~the~~price ~~first~~decreased ~~quarter~~during ofthe ~~2009~~three inmonths ~~which~~ended ~~we’re~~June ~~required~~30, to2010 ~~value~~and ~~the~~2009 ~~fair~~which ~~value of~~made our outstanding warrants and conversion features ~~for~~less ~~certain outstanding equity instruments and recognize the change in fair value~~valuable.

We recorded a gain on a change in the fair value of derivatives of $281,000. This gain is primarily due to the fact that our stock price decreased during the three months ended December 31, 2009 which made our outstanding warrants and conversion features less valuable.21

Net Income/(Loss) - As a result of the above, for the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a net ~~loss~~income of $~~353~~1,~~038~~118,829 compared to a net loss of $13,~~309~~566,~~081~~956 for the same period the previous year.

For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

Results From Operations

Revenues - Revenues were $1,963,370 and $2,496,291 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in revenues of approximately $533,000 is primarily due to decreased revenues associated with FLO TV due to the timing of the staggered national rollout of their high-powered wireless transmission sites and the delay of the analog to HD TV switchover. Revenues to FLO TV were 54% and 64% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively

Cost of Sales - Cost of sales were $184,054 and $353,298 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Overall gross profit percentage increased to 91% in the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 86% in the comparable prior year period due to an increase, as a percentage of sales, in software sales and support services during the period.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses - Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2,983,678 and $3,390,505 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of approximately $407,000. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily attributed to an approximately $175,000 decrease in marketing expenses due to having a smaller presence at the National Association of Broadcasters (“NAB”) trade show in 2009 and an approximately $270,000 decrease in payroll costs based on headcount reductions.

Other Expense - Other Expense was $2,660,729 and $1,534,609 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The approximately $1,126,000 increase can be attributed to $5,936,000 in expense due to the issuance of additional warrants and a reduction in the conversion price of the notes held by our Tranche I and II debenture holders. Based on the terms of the debentures, the conversion price of the debentures and the amount and exercise price of their warrants would be reduced if the Company issued any new stock or debt at terms more beneficial than their terms. When we issued our Tranche III debentures in the first quarter of 2010 with a lower conversion price and warrant exercise price, we had to reprice the Tranche I and II instruments. This expense was mitigated by adoption of new accounting rules in the first quarter of 2009 in which we’re required to value the fair value of warrants and conversion features for certain outstanding equity instruments and record the change in fair value in Other Expense. We recorded a gain on a change in the fair value of derivatives of $5,588,000. This gain is primarily due to the fact that our stock price decreased during the nine months ended December 31, 2009 which made our outstanding warrants and conversion features less valuable.

Net Loss - As a result of the above, for the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a net loss of $3,865,091 compared to a net loss of $2,782,121 for the same period the previous year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~Cash~~The cash ~~balances~~balance ~~totaled~~was $~~1,901~~0 as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 ~~compared~~and ~~to $1,345 at December 31, 2008~~2009.

Net cash used in operating activities was $~~331~~163,~~699~~460 and $~~730~~280,~~253~~349 for the ~~nine~~three months ~~ended~~ ~~December~~ended 31June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. The use of cash in ~~2009~~2010 is primarily the result of paying down certain payables and ~~2008~~ in 2009 is the primarily the result of funding the net operating loss of $3,~~865~~566,~~091~~ 956 (which included non-cash expenses of $2,~~561~~982,~~586~~911) ~~and $2,782,121 (which included non-cash expenses of $1,369,438) for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively~~.

Net cash ~~used~~provided inby ~~investing~~financing activities was $0163,460 and $12280,~~702~~550 ~~and~~ for the ~~nine~~three months ~~ended~~ ~~December~~ended 31June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. ~~The~~ Net ~~primary~~cash ~~use~~provided ofby ~~cash in~~financing ~~2008~~activities was primarily the result of related to ~~computer~~the ~~and~~Tranche ~~equipment~~III ~~purchases~~of the Company’s private placement of such debentures.

~~Net~~As ~~cash~~of ~~provided~~June ~~by financing activities was $332~~30,~~600~~ ~~and $671~~2010,~~224~~ ~~for~~ the ~~nine~~Company ~~months ended~~had ~~December~~a ~~31,~~working ~~2009~~capital ~~and~~deficiency ~~2008,~~of ~~respectively~~approximately $9. ~~Net~~0 ~~cash~~Million ~~provided~~including ~~by financing~~short-term ~~activities~~notes inpayable, ~~fiscal~~convertible ~~2009~~notes ~~was~~payable ~~the~~and accrued ~~result~~interest of ~~net~~approximately ~~proceeds of~~ $~~355~~3,791,000 ~~related~~, tonet ~~the~~of ~~issuance~~applicable debt discount of approximately $~~426~~150,000. We ~~principal~~also ~~amount~~have oflong-term ~~Debentures~~convertible ~~related to~~debentures ~~the~~of ~~Tranche~~approximately ~~III~~$114,000, net of ~~the~~an ~~Company’s~~applicable ~~private~~debt ~~placement~~discount of ~~such~~approximately ~~Debentures~~$555,000. ~~Net~~In ~~cash~~addition, ~~provided~~the byCompany ~~financing~~is ~~activities~~delinquent in ~~the~~remitting ~~nine~~paytoll ~~months~~taxes ~~ended~~totaling ~~December~~approximately 31$837,000 ~~2008~~and ~~was~~related ~~the~~penalties ~~result~~and ofinterest ~~proceeds from issuance~~ of approximately $~~865~~258,000 ~~from~~and ~~the~~also ~~issuance~~has ofaccrued $1,~~038~~012,000 ~~principal~~as ~~amount of Debentures in~~additional ~~Tranche~~compensation II(including ofpenalties ~~the~~and ~~Company’s~~interest) ~~private~~on ~~placement~~behalf of ~~such Debentures. Financing~~the ~~costs~~Chief ofExecutive Officer ~~$24,000~~ and ~~$143,026 were incurred related to~~ the ~~raising~~Chief ofTechnology ~~capital~~Officer ~~for~~related ~~the~~to ~~nine~~their ~~months~~classification ~~ended December 31, 2009~~as ~~and~~consultants ~~2008,~~of ~~respectively~~the Company.

AsIn oforder ~~December~~to ~~31,~~continue ~~2009,~~its ~~the~~operations ~~Company~~through ~~had~~and abeyond ~~working~~June ~~capital deficiency of approximately $10.8 Million including short-term notes payable~~2011, ~~convertible~~the ~~notes~~Company ~~payable~~will ~~and~~need ~~accrued~~to ~~interest~~increase ~~of approximately $3~~revenue,~~474,000,~~ ~~net~~repay ofor ~~applicable~~obtain ~~debt~~extensions ~~discount~~on ~~of approximately~~its ~~$428,000. We~~existing ~~also have long~~short-term ~~convertible debentures of approximately $135,000, net of an applicable~~ debt ~~discount of approximately~~ ~~$290,000. In addition,~~and ~~the~~possibly ~~Company~~raise isadditional ~~delinquent~~working incapital ~~filing~~through ~~certain of its payroll returns (including~~ the ~~remittance~~sale of ~~taxes)~~debt ~~totaling~~or ~~approximately $585,000 and related~~equity ~~penalties~~securities ~~and~~in ~~interest~~addition ofto ~~approximately~~the ~~$257,000~~completion ~~and also has accrued $942,000 as additional compensation (including penalties and interest) on behalf~~ of ~~the Chief~~its ~~Executive~~placement ~~Officer and the Chief Technology officer related to their classification as consultants~~ of ~~the Company~~ debentures.

InThere ~~order~~can tobe ~~continue~~no ~~its~~assurance ~~operations~~that ~~through~~the ~~and~~Company ~~beyond~~will ~~December~~be ~~2010,~~able to raise the ~~Company~~capital it requires in this time frame or at all or that it will be able to raise the capital on ~~need~~terms acceptable to ~~increase~~it. ~~revenue~~In addition, ~~repay~~there orcan ~~obtain~~be no assurances that the Company will be successful in obtaining extensions onof its ~~existing~~notes, ~~short-term~~if required or be able ~~debt~~to ~~and~~pay ~~possibly~~amounts ~~raise~~due ~~additional~~on ~~working~~payroll ~~capital~~tax ~~through~~returns. If it is not successful, the ~~sale~~Company would seek to negotiate other terms for the issuance of debt, orpursue bridge ~~equity~~financing, ~~securities~~negotiate inwith ~~addition~~suppliers for a reduction of debt through issuance of stock, and/or seek to raise equity through the ~~completion~~sale of its ~~placement~~common stock. At this time management cannot assess the likelihood of achieving these objectives. If ~~Debentures~~the Company is unable to achieve these objectives, the Company may be forced to cease its business operations, sell its assets and/or seek further protection under applicable bankruptcy laws.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the capital it requires in this time frame or at all or that it will be able to raise the capital on terms acceptable to it. In addition, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in obtaining extensions of its notes, if required or be able to file payroll tax returns and pay amounts due. If it is not successful, the Company would seek to negotiate other terms for the issuance of debt, pursue bridge financing, negotiate with suppliers for a reduction of debt through issuance of stock, and/or seek to raise equity through the sale of its common stock. At this time management cannot assess the likelihood of achieving these objectives. If the Company is unable to achieve these objectives, the Company may be forced to cease its business operations, sell its assets and/or seek further protection under applicable bankruptcy laws.

Except as provided above, the Company has no present commitment that is likely to result in its liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. In addition, except as noted above, the Company knows of no trend, additional demand, event or uncertainty that will result in, or that is reasonably likely to result in, the Company’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. The Company has no material commitments for capital expenditures. The Company knows of no material trends, favorable or unfavorable, in its capital resources.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and assume that the Company will continue as a going concern.

Going Concern

The Company has incurred net losses of approximately $27.31 million since inception. Additionally, the Company had a net working capital deficiency of approximately $109.80 million at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010. These conditions raise substantial doubt ~~about~~ about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying ~~financial~~ financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Primarily as a result of its recurring losses and its lack of liquidity, the Company has received a report from its independent ~~registered~~ registered public accountants, included with its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, ~~2009~~2010, that included an explanatory paragraph describing ~~the~~ the conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to ~~continue~~ continue as a going concern. ~~The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.~~

Inflation and Seasonality

Inflation has not materially affected the Company during the past fiscal year. The Company’s business is not seasonal in nature.

2723

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

(Not Applicable)

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation and Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's "disclosure controls and procedures," as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15e promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report due to a material weakness identified by management relating to the lack of sufficient accounting resources.

Based upon its evaluation, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has concluded there ~~is a~~are material ~~weakness~~weaknesses with respect to its internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(e).

The material ~~weakness~~weaknesses identified by management relates to the lack of sufficient accounting resources~~. Historically,~~ Weand ~~have~~the ~~only~~lack ~~had~~of ~~one~~documentation ~~full-time employee~~of inthe ~~our~~performance ~~accounting~~of ~~department (Chief Operating Officer) to perform~~key ~~routine~~controls ~~record keeping~~ and ~~his~~document ~~resignation~~retention. inWe ~~January~~have ~~2009~~engaged ~~has~~outside ~~caused~~consultants ~~many~~to ~~key~~perform ~~controls~~financial toreporting befunctions ~~performed~~and ~~by,~~perform orroutine ~~at the direction of our CEO and~~record ~~CFO~~keeping. Consequently, our financial reporting function is ~~limited. In~~ ~~order to correct this material weakness, the Company has~~limited ~~hired~~which ~~outside~~makes ~~consultants~~it difficult to ~~assist~~report ~~with~~our financial ~~statement~~information ~~preparation~~with ~~and reporting needs of~~ the ~~Company~~SEC timely and ~~intends~~our tocontrol ~~assist~~environment ~~internal~~does ~~accounting personnel~~not ~~with consultants as needed to ensure that management will have adequate resources in order to attain complete reporting of financial information in a timely manner and~~ provide aan ~~further~~appropriate ~~level of~~ segregation of ~~financial~~duties ~~responsibilities~~or asdocumentation of the ~~Company~~performance ~~continues~~of tokey ~~expand~~controls.

In order to correct this material weakness, the Company has hired outside consultants to assist with financial statement preparation and reporting needs and plans to hire internal full-time accounting personnel in the third calendar quarter of 2010. We also intend to augment internal accounting personnel with consultants as needed to ensure that management will have adequate resources in order to attain complete reporting of financial information in a timely manner and provide a further level of segregation of financial responsibilities..

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected. Such limitations include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures, such as simple errors or mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established process.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes to the internal controls during the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~ 2010 that have materially affected or that are reasonably likely to materially ~~affect~~ affect the internal controls over financial reporting.

2824

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

OnNot May 17, 2007, an action was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court for breach of contract and similar causes of action by the Epstein Family Trust against the Company in relation to two outstanding promissory notes issued by the Company totaling $75,000 ($25,000 and $50,000) plus accrued interest. The Epstein Family Trust is seeking attorney’s fees and costs in addition to the principal and interest. These notes were guaranteed by Mr. Geoffrey Talbot, the Company's CEO, for up to $25,000, and therefore Mr. Talbot was joined in the legal action as a third-party defendant. The case number is BC 371 276. The parties have reached a settlement agreement where the plaintiff has agreed to convert all principal and interest into shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share effective February 28, 2008 where the Company will pay legal fees of approximately $12,000 to plaintiff which is still outstanding. . This obligation is recorded as accounts payable at December 31, 2009Applicable

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Not Applicable

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Between April 1 and ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010, the Company sold Debentures to investors as follows:

• The Company issued an additional $~~426~~195,~~000~~960 principal amount of the Debentures and received net proceeds of $~~355~~163,~~000~~300 related to Tranche III of the private placement of such Debentures. In connection with the Debentures, the Company issued five-year warrants to purchase 1783,~~704,000~~840 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. The Debentures are convertible into common stock at $0.25 per share.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

AtNot ~~December 31, 2009, $601,250 principal amount of short-term promissory notes are in default and $241,376 of interest had accrued on all outstanding short-term promissory notes as of such date.~~Applicable

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not Applicable

Item 5.

Other Information.

Not Applicable

3025

Item 6. Exhibits

Item 6.	Exhibits

(a)	Exhibits
	31.1	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

~~(a) Exhibits~~26

31.1 Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 22, 2010	/s/Geoffrey P. Talbot/s/
Date: August 18, 2010	/s/Geoffrey P. Talbot/s/
	Name: Geoffrey P. Talbot
	Title: Chief Financial Officer

3227

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit	Description
31.1	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certificate of Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

3328

Filing Compare · STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP