U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One) x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 ¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act For the transition period from N/A to N/AFORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
	the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
	of the Securities Exchange Act

For the transition period from N/A to N/A

Commission File No. 000-53013

Pro-Tech Industries, Inc.

(Name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada		20-8758875
State of Incorporation		IRS Employer Identification No.

8550 Younger Creek DR, #2

Sacramento, CA 95828

(Address of principal executive offices)

(916) 388-0255

(Issuer’s telephone number)

(Meltdown Massage & Body Works, Inc.)

(Former name or Former Address if Changes Since Last Report)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No ox

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non–accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer large accelerated filer” and “Smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer ¨

Non–Accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes o ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at ~~May~~August 2413, 2010
Common stock, $0.001 par value		18,~~074~~532,~~852~~808

PRO-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FILING

~~MARCH~~June 3130, 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		~~Page Numbers~~	Page Numbers
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)~~	3Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
Item 2.		Management Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	5
Item 3		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows	6
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures	28
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2.	Management Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
Item1		Legal Proceedings	29
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item1A		Risk Factors	29
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32
Item1	Legal Proceedings	27
Item 4.		Removed and Reserved	32
Item1A	Risk Factors	27
Item 5		Other information	32
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30
Item 6.		Exhibits	32
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	30
		Signature	34
Item 4.	Removed and Reserved	30
Item 5	Other information	30
Item 6.	Exhibits	30
	Signature	32
CERTIFICATIONS
Exhibit 31 – Management certification
Exhibit 32 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act

CERTIFICATIONS

	Exhibit 31 – Management certification		35-36

	Exhibit 32 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act		37-38

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Interim Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Interim Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Pro-Tech Industries, Inc.

(Formerly Meltdown Massage and Body Works, Inc.)

General

The accompanying reviewed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Therefore, ~~they~~ they do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and stockholders'’ equity in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Except as disclosed herein, there has been no material ~~change~~ change in the information disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company'’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. In the opinion of management, all ~~adjustments~~ adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.

Index to Financial Statements

	~~Page~~	Page
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	4
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009		4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	5
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		5
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	6
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		6-7
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	~~8 ~20~~	8 ~20

PRO-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010 (unaudited)			December 31, 2009
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~152~~551,~~210~~615		$	~~172~~186,~~490~~894
Contract receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, of $110,000 and $60,000, respectively		3,720,887			3,850,051
Contract receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, of $100,000 and $50,000, respectively		2,620,959			2,659,979
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings		~~396~~322,~~230~~976			~~306~~123,~~073~~185
Note receivable – related party		~~77,000~~-			77,000
Inventory		~~248~~188,~~968~~014			~~273~~200,~~968~~238
Other current assets		~~158~~321,~~537~~668			~~155~~154,386
Total current assets		4,753,832			4,834,968
Discontinued operations		1,234,446			1,433,283
Property and equipment:		874,041			874,041
Total current assets		5,239,678			4,834,965
Less: accumulated depreciation		600,578			571,394
Property plant and equipment, net		245,479			298,141
Net property and equipment		273,463			302,647
Other Assets:
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, of $228,761 and $181,431, respectively		55,218			102,548
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, of $276,091 and $181,431, respectively		7,888			102,548
Goodwill		331,075			331,075
Deposits		10,856			10,856
Total assets	$	5,424,444		$	5,582,094
Discontinued Operations		3,252			4,509
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Total assets	$	5,838,228		$	5,582,094
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	32,~~519~~778,~~602~~930		$	2,~~713~~249,~~840~~449
Notes payable – others –current portion		216,728			213,394
Notes payable – current portion		233,809			184,512
Accruals on uncompleted contracts		~~445~~223,~~781~~559			~~244~~197,~~763~~514
Reserve for loss on uncompleted contracts		-			9087,~~514~~431
Deferred tax liability		-			80,490
Line of credit		1,000,000			900,000
Total current liabilities		5,182,111			4,243,000
Warrant and derivative liability		249,884			-
Discontinued operations		667,049			579,094
Total current liabilities		5,153,231			4,243,000
Long -Term Liabilities:
Notes payable- others – long term portion		~~358~~235,~~527~~132			~~414~~332,~~071~~580
LT Deferred tax liability		-			-
Discontinued Operations		67,050			81,491
Commitments and contingencies		-			-
Total Long Term Liabilities		302,182			414,071
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Series A 10% convertible redeemable preferred stock, no par value, 40,000 shares authorized; 23,000 and 0 issued and outstanding, (net) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		226,387			-
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 18,074,852 and 17,997,213 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		18,594			18,594
Stockholders’ Equity:
Paid in capital		1,432,866			1,421,467
Preferred stock, undesignated, no par value; 1,960,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Accumulated deficit		(1,567,654	)		(515,038	)
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 18,532,808 and 18,593,880 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		18,533			18,594
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(116,194	)		925,023
Paid in capital		1,404,374			1,421,467
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	5,424,444		$	5,582,094
Accumulated deficit		(1,266,479	)		(515,038	)
Total stockholders’ equity		156,428			925,023
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	5,838,228		$	5,582,094

~~The~~See accompanying notes ~~are~~to ~~an integral part of~~ these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

PRO-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2010			Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010			Three Months Ended June 30, 2009			Six MonthsEnded June 30, 2010			Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net revenue	$	43,~~109~~707,~~946~~399		$	43,~~405~~597,~~174~~993		$	7,159,939		$	7,632,638
Cost of sales		32,~~724~~132,~~156~~062			2,~~592~~332,~~028~~862			5,041,027			4,678,465
Gross profit		~~385~~1,~~790~~575,337			1,~~813~~265,~~146~~131			2,118,912			2,954,174
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		1,403,193			1,571,857
Depreciation and amortization (Note G & H)		97,120			42,507			173,007			79,130
Depreciation and amortization		76,514			36,623
Selling, general and administrative		1,149,096			1,663,455			2,424,933			3,227,361
Total Operating Expenses		1,~~479~~246,~~707~~216			1,~~608~~705,~~480~~962			2,597,940			3,306,491
(Loss) Income from Operations		(1,093,917	)		204,666
Income (Loss) from Operations		329,121			(440,831	)		(479,028	)		(352,317	)
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income(expense), net		(39,190	)		(22,020	)
Gain on change in fair value of derivative liability		203,827			-			203,827			-
Total Other Expenses		(39,190	)		(22,020	)
Interest expense, net		(22,941	)		(28,543	)		(56,678	)		(46,060	)
(Loss) Income before income taxes		(1,133,107	)		182,646
Total Other Income (Expense)		180,886			(28,543	)		147,149			(46,060	)
Income taxes (benefit)		(80,490	)		60,316
Income (loss) income before income taxes		510,007			(469,374	)		(331,879	)		(398,377	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,052,617	)	$	122,330
Income tax benefit (expense)		-			89,792			80,490			29,476
Net income (loss) per common share
Income(loss) from continuing operations		510,007			(379,582	)		(251,389	)		(368,901	)
Basic	$	(0.06	)	$	0.01
Income(loss) from discontinued operations		(196,962	)		154,519			(488,182	)		266,168
Diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	0.01
Net Income(Loss)		313,045			(225,063	)		(739,571	)		(102,733	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		18,022,600			17,933,333
Preferred stock dividends and amortized discount		105,098			-			105,098			-
Net Income(loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	207,947		$	(225,063	)	$	(844,669	)	$	(102,733	)
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations:
Basic	$	0.03		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Diluted		0.02			(0.02	)		(0.01	)		(0.02	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.02		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted		0.01			(0.01	)		(0.04	)		(0.01	)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholder:
Basic	$	0.01		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted		0.01			(0.01	)		(0.05	)		(0.01	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding (Note A)		18,473,871			17,772,107			18,382,232			17,486,713

~~The~~See accompanying notes ~~are~~to ~~an integral part of~~ these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

PRO-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

(UNAUDITED)

	Six months endedJune 30,
	2010			2009
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) from operations	$	(1739,~~052,617~~571	)	$	~~122~~(102,~~330~~733	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(488,182	)		266,168
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(251,389	)		(368,901	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		76151,~~514~~689			3679,~~623~~130
Bad debt write off		35,314			4,828
Amortization of deferred financing costs		21,318			-
Accrual for bad debt allowance		50,000			-
Bad debt write off		47,664			35,512
Deferred tax liability, net		(80,490	)		(21,363	)
Accrual for bad debt allowance		50,000			(76,000	)
Stock issued to employees and board of directors		11,400			-
Change in fair value of warrant liability and reset derivative		(203,827	)		-
Stock issued for services		-			12,000
Amortization of deferred compensation		24,200			72,750
Accruals (reversal) of loss against uncompleted contracts		(9087,~~514~~431	)		(620,~~576~~995	)
Deferred tax liability (asset)		(80,490	)		(63,780	)
(Increase) decrease in:
Contract receivable		43(58,~~851~~644	)		~~(147~~838,~~928~~603	)
Inventory		2512,~~000~~225			-
Other current assets, net		(359,~~152~~726	)		~~130~~131,~~862~~341
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings		(90199,~~157~~791	)		4653,~~826~~856
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings		~~201~~26,~~018~~045			(~~122~~466,~~581~~275	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net		~~809~~571,~~097~~768			(~~261~~311,~~231~~845	)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(64,736	)		(206,210	)
Net Cash Used in Continuing Operating Activities		(36,387	)		(96,604	)
Net Cash Used in Discontinued Operating Activities		(200,133	)		(106,822	)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(236,520	)		(203,426	)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Cash received on purchase of subsidiary		-			9,043
Purchase of property and equipment		(4,367	)		(12,820	)
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(10,520	)
Net Cash Used In Continuing Investing Activities		(4,367	)		(12,820	)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities		-			(1,477	)
Net Cash Provided by Discontinued Investing Activities		-			9,043
Net Cash Used In Continuing Investing Activities		(4,367	)		(3,777	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Payments of long term debt		(55,544	)		(45,205	)
Proceeds from short term borrowings		42,500			-
Net proceeds from line of credit		100,000			181,227
Proceeds from sale of convertible redeemable preferred stock		575,000			-
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		44,456			136,023
Payments of long term debt		(97,448	)		(124,759	)
Net Decrease in Cash And Cash Equivalents		(20,280	)		(71,664	)
Proceeds from line of credit		100,000			294,500
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		172,490			86,895
Net Cash Provided by Continuing Financing Activities		620,052			169,741
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period	$	152,210		$	15,232
Net Cash Provided by Discontinued Financing Activities		(14,441	)		(38,790	)
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		605,611			130,952
Cash paid during period for interest	$	30,808		$	20,936
Net increase (decrease) in Cash And Cash Equivalents		364,721			(76,251	)
Cash paid during period for taxes	$	-		$	-
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		186,894			86,895
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period	$	551,615		$	10,645

~~The~~See accompanying notes ~~are~~to ~~an integral part of~~ these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

PRO-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(~~UNAUDITED~~unaudited)

(continued)

	Six months endedJune 30,
	2010		2009
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during period for interest	$	56,678	$	46,060
Cash paid during period for taxes	$	-	$	-
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Shares issued for compensation	$	11,400	$	12,000
Acquisition:
Current assets acquired	$	-	$	338,435
Equipment and other assets acquired		-		6,505
Intangible assets acquired		-		615,054
Liabilities assumed		-		(578,994	)
Shares issued as consideration	$	-	$	381,000
Fair value of warrants issued with series A redeemable preferred stock	$	204,786	$	-
Beneficial conversion feature of series A redeemable preferred stock	$	453,711	$	-
Preferred stock dividend – non-cash	$	11,870	$	-
Amortization of BCF transferred to additional paid in capital	$	93,228	$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

PRO-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~March~~June 3130, 2010

(~~Unaudited~~UNAUDITED)

NOTE A - ~~SUMMARY~~BUSINESS ~~OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~DESCRIPTION

~~A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements follows.~~General

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. However, the results from operations for the six months period ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2010. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated December 31, 2009 financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Business and Basis of Presentation

The Company was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 4, 2007 under the name Meltdown Massage and Body Works, Inc. (“Meltdown”) and formerly operated as a development stage company. On December 31, 2008, Meltdown merged with and into Pro-Tech Fire Protection Systems Corp. (“Pro-Tech”). On ~~was~~May ~~incorporated~~8, on2009, ~~May~~the 4,Company’s ~~1995~~stockholders ~~under~~approved a ~~the~~name ~~laws~~change offrom ~~the~~Meltdown ~~State~~Massage ofand ~~California~~Body Works, Inc. to ~~engage~~Pro-Tech inIndustries, Inc. ~~any~~which ~~lawful~~became ~~corporate undertaking,~~effective ~~including,~~with ~~but~~the ~~not~~filing ~~limited~~of ~~to;~~an ~~installation,~~amendment ~~repair~~to ~~and~~the ~~inspections~~Company Articles of ~~fire~~Incorporation ~~protection~~on ~~systems~~May in11, ~~commercial~~2009. The Company is now known as Pro-Tech Industries, ~~military~~Inc. and ~~industrial settings~~the new ticker symbol is PTCK.

~~Pro-Tech~~The ~~Fire~~unaudited ~~Protection~~condensed ~~Systems~~consolidated isfinancial astatements ~~full-service~~include ~~contractor serving~~ the ~~western~~accounts ~~United~~of ~~States~~Meltdown, ~~with~~Pro-Tech ~~offices in California~~ and ~~Nevada. Services include estimating~~Conesco, ~~designing,~~ ~~fabricating~~Inc., ~~and~~the ~~installing~~operating ~~all~~subsidiaries ~~types of standard and specialty water-based fire protection systems. In addition~~(collectively, the ~~company offers~~ “~~Day Work~~Company” ~~services, including inspecting, testing, repairing and servicing of same~~).

The Company’s ~~serves~~operating subsidiary, Pro-Tech, was incorporated under the ~~new~~laws ~~construction~~of ~~market~~the State of California on May 4, as1995. ~~well~~Pro-Tech asis ~~customers~~a ~~retro~~full-~~fitting,~~service contractor ~~upgrading~~serving orthe ~~repairing~~western ~~their~~United ~~existing facilities~~States, ~~bringing~~with ~~existing~~offices ~~facilities~~in California and Nevada. toServices ~~current~~include ~~standards~~estimating, ~~(for~~designing, ~~example~~fabricating, and installing ~~sprinklers~~all attypes aof standard ~~customer’s~~and specialty water-based fire protection systems. In addition, the ~~expanded~~company ~~storage~~offers ~~warehouse~~“Day Work” services, ~~etc~~including inspecting, testing, repairing and servicing of same.).

~~NOTE~~On BJanuary 16, 2009, the Company acquired Conesco, Inc. (“Conesco”) in a stock for stock exchange. Conesco, Inc has been a provider of commercial flooring products, installation, maintenance and design consultation services to businesses throughout Northern California since 1993. Conesco’s work graces some of the most prestigious properties in Northern California and beyond. Conesco’s award-winning ~~MERGER~~team ~~AND~~(30 ~~CORPORATE~~employees) ~~RESTRUCTURE~~approach has earned the company a reputation for leading-edge flooring expertise, great service and first-class products.

On ~~December~~ July 31, ~~2008~~2010, the ~~stockholders~~Company entered into a letter of ~~Pro-Tech~~intent ~~Fire~~to ~~Protection~~sell ~~Systems~~the ~~Corp.~~stock of ~~(“Pro-Tech”)~~Conesco, ~~entered~~Inc. ~~into~~to anits ~~agreement~~prior ~~for~~owner upon the ~~exchange~~terms and subject to the conditions of a ~~common~~definitive ~~stock~~agreement. The final terms of the definitive agreement ~~(“Acquisition~~are ~~Agreements”,~~in “the ~~Transaction”,~~process orof ~~“Merger”)~~being ~~with~~finalized and management projects the ~~Company.~~completion ~~The~~of ~~Company~~the ~~had~~sale aon ~~total~~or ofabout 70August 31,~~000,000~~ ~~authorized~~2010. The ~~shares~~letter ~~with~~of aintent ~~par~~is non-binding ~~value~~and ofeither $0side may terminate with written notice.~~001~~ These ~~per~~unaudited ~~share~~condensed ~~and~~consolidated ~~3,500,000~~financial ~~shares~~statements ~~issued~~include ~~and~~disclosure ~~outstanding~~of asthe results of ~~December~~operations 31for Conesco, for all periods presented, as discontinued ~~2008~~operations.

~~The~~All ~~Company’s~~significant ~~year~~intercompany ~~end~~balances ~~for~~and ~~accounting~~transactions ~~purposes~~have ~~was~~been ~~December~~eliminated ~~31, 2008. As a result of the Merger, there was a change~~ in ~~control of the public entity. In accordance~~ ~~with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 141, Pro-Tech is deemed to be the acquiring entity~~consolidation. ~~While the transaction is accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, in substance the Merger is a recapitalization of Pro-Tech’s capital structure~~

~~For~~NOTE ~~accounting~~B ~~purposes,~~– ~~the~~REVERSE ~~Company~~MERGER ~~accounted~~AND ~~for~~CORPORATE the transaction as a reverse acquisition and Pro-Tech is the surviving entity. The total purchase price and carrying value of net assets acquired was $3,500. The Company did not recognize goodwill or any intangible assets in connection with the transaction. As of the date of the Agreement, the Company was an inactive corporation with no significant assets and liabilities.RESTRUCTURE

~~Effective~~On ~~with~~December 31, 2008, the ~~Acquisition~~Company ~~Agreements,~~consummated ~~all~~a ~~previously~~reverse ~~outstanding~~merger ~~common~~by ~~stock~~entering ~~owned~~into a byshare exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange”) with the stockholders of Pro-Tech’s, pursuant ~~stockholders~~to ~~were~~which ~~exchanged~~the ~~for~~stockholders ~~an aggregate~~ of ~~10,100,000~~Pro-Tech exchanged ~~shares~~all of the ~~Company’s~~issued ~~common~~and outstanding capital stock, ~~$0.001~~of ~~par~~Pro-Tech ~~value~~for ~~(“the~~10,100,000 ~~Common~~shares ~~Stock”). As~~of ~~part~~common stock of the ~~Transaction~~Company itrepresenting ~~was~~approximately ~~agreed~~74% of ~~that,~~the Company’s ~~all~~ outstanding ~~shares~~capital ~~would~~stock, ~~remain outstanding.~~Meltdown ~~The~~shareholders ~~effect~~retained of the ~~Transaction was that~~ 3,500,000 shares of ~~Common Stock~~previously ~~would~~issued beshares ~~retained~~of common stock.

The value of the stock issued was the historical cost of the Company's net tangible assets of $3,500, which did not differ materially from their fair value. The total consideration paid of $3,500 is summarized further below.

	December 31, 2008
Common stock retained	$	3,500
Assets acquired		(-	)
Liabilities assumed		-
Total consideration paid	$	3,500

As a result of the Share Exchange, there was a change in control of the Company. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, the Company was the acquiring entity. In substance, the Share Exchange is a recapitalization of the Company’s capital structure rather than a business combination.

For accounting purposes, the Company accounted for the transaction as a reverse acquisition with the Pro-Tech as the surviving entity. The total purchase price and carrying value of net assets acquired was $-0-. The Company did not recognize goodwill or any intangible assets in connection with the transaction. Prior to the Share Exchange, the Company was an inactive corporation with no significant assets and liabilities.

All reference to Common Stock shares and per share amounts have been retroactively restated to effect the reverse acquisition as if the transaction had taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.

The total consideration paid was $3,500 and the significant components of the transaction are as follows:

	December 31, 2008
Common stock retained	$	3,500
Assets acquired		(-	)
Liabilities assumed		-
Total consideration paid	$	3,500

In accordance with Statement of Position 98-5 (“SOP 98-5”), the Company expensed $3,500 as organization costs.

On ~~May 8,~~July ~~2009~~31, 2010, the Company’s ~~stockholders~~has ~~approved~~entered into a letter ~~name~~of ~~change~~intent ~~from~~with ~~Meltdown~~the ~~Massage~~former ~~and~~owner ~~Body~~of ~~Works~~Conesco, Inc. to ~~Pro-Tech~~buy ~~Industries,~~all ~~Inc.~~of ~~which became effective with~~ the ~~filing~~outstanding shares of anConesco ~~amendment~~(see footnote U tobelow). The ~~the~~accompanying unaudited ~~our~~condensed consolidated financial ~~Articles~~statements ofinclude ~~Incorporation~~the onhistorical ~~May 11,~~financial ~~2009. The~~condition, ~~Company~~results isof ~~now~~operations ~~known~~and ascash flows of Pro-Tech ~~Industries,~~showing ~~Inc.~~Conesco ~~and~~as ~~the new~~a ~~ticker~~discontinued ~~symbol is PTCK~~operation.

NOTE C - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues from fixed-price and modified fixed-price construction contracts on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of cost incurred to date to estimated total cost for each contract. That method is used because management considers total cost to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts. Because of inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the near term. The Company also recognizes revenue from non-fixed price (time and materials) contracts. The revenue from these contracts is billed monthly and is based on actual time and material costs which have occurred on the job for the billing period.

Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation. Selling, general, and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability may result in revisions to costs and income, which are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Changes in estimated job profitability resulting from job performance, job conditions, contract penalty provisions, claims, change orders, and settlements, are accounted for as changes in estimates in the current period.

Revenue on contracts can be derived from different disciplines and is accounted for on a consolidated basis by job to see overall performance, as well as the ability to break the job down by discipline to see how each contributes to the overall performance of the job.

The asset, “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts”, represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The liability, “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts,” or “accruals on uncompleted contracts” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

Contract Receivables

Contract receivables are recorded when invoices are issued and are presented in the balance sheet net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Contract receivables are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on the Company’s historical losses, the existing economic conditions in the construction industry, and the financial stability of its customers.

Inventory

The Company maintains an inventory which primarily consists of small parts such as sprinkler heads, gaskets, pipe joints, junction boxes, outlets, etc. which comes from closed jobs or economical buying opportunities. They get used ~~for~~ for repair work or filler when jobs run short. The inventory on hand was $~~248~~188,~~968~~ 014 and $~~273~~200,~~968~~238 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Advertising

The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expenses incurred. The Company incurred $1013,~~166~~541 and $1017,~~997~~548, of advertising costs for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Income Taxes

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”) deferred income taxes are the result of the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Generally, deferred income taxes are classified as current or non-current in accordance with the classification of the related asset or liability. Items that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided against deferred income tax assets in circumstances where management believes the recoverability of a portion of the assets is not reasonably assured. Losses incurred, if any, are carried forward as applicable Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”) and the Internal Revenue Code and potentially may be used to offset taxable net income generated in the future. The Company had previously elected to be treated as a subchapter “S” corporation for federal tax purposes. The reverse merger caused the Company to lose its subchapter “S” corporation status. The Company became responsible for $849,628 in deferred income that carried forward from 2007 when Pro-Tech was forced to change from cash to accrual based taxpayer. Pro-Tech took a 481a election to spread the acceleration over 4 years. The Company provides for income taxes based on pre-tax earnings reported in the consolidated financial statements. Certain items such as depreciation are recognized for tax purposes in periods other than the period they are reported in the consolidated financial statements. Following the reverse merger status, beginning, January 1, 2009, the Company became a C-Corp and subject to standard quarterly taxes provisions. Results of operations may not be comparable to prior results.

Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years using the straight-line method as follows:

Construction equipment	5-~~7years~~7 years
Automobiles	5 years
Computer Software	3 years
Office equipment and furniture	3-~~7years~~7 years
Leasehold improvements	life of the lease agreement where appropriate

Maintenance and repairs to automobiles, equipment, furniture and computers is expensed as incurred. There is no ~~re-evaluation~~reevaluation of useful life as most of the ~~assets~~ assets are short term in nature and the repairs or maintenance are in the normal ~~course~~ course of the operating life of the asset. Upon disposal of assets, the Company reduces the asset account and the accumulated depreciation account for the balances at that point in time. The difference between the ~~amounts~~ amounts received greater than the book value is recognized as a gain and if the amount is less than the book value is recognized as a loss. Depreciation is not included in cost of goods sold.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted ~~Accounting~~ASC ~~Standards Codification subtopic~~ 360-10,-15-3 ~~Property, Plant~~“Impairment ~~and~~of ~~Equipment~~Disposal ~~(“ASC~~of ~~360~~long-10lived Assets”). ~~ASC~~The ~~360-10~~Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undiscounted cash flows. Should any impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 360-10 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company periodically reviews its contract receivables in determining its allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $110,000 and $60,000 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company periodically reviews its contract receivables in determining its allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $100,000 and $50,000 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic and diluted income or loss per common share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010 and 2009, under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ~~subtopic~~ subtopic 260-10, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260-10”), “Earnings Per Share” and as amended/superseded in “Compensation” (“ASC 718-10”). As the Company ~~had~~reported a net loss for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2009 and ~~net income for~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010 and 2009., ~~The~~the ~~Company~~effects ~~did~~of ~~not~~the ~~have~~shares ~~any~~issuable ~~common~~upon ~~stock~~exercise ~~equivalents~~of ~~issued~~outstanding orwarrants, ~~outstanding~~options and convertible securities as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 orand 2009 ~~for~~have ~~any~~not ~~other~~been ~~earlier~~considered in the diluted net loss per common share since ~~period~~these dilutive securities would reduce the loss per common share and become anti-dilutive. Non-vested shares have been excluded as common stock ~~equivalents~~ equivalents in the diluted earnings per share because they are either anti-dilutive, or their effect is not material.

The following reconciliation of net income and share amounts used in the computation of income (loss) per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2010

Net income from continuing operations used in computing basic net income	$	510,007

Less: Gain on derivative/warrant liability marked to fair value		(203,827	)

Net loss from continuing operations in computing diluted net loss per share:	$	306,180

The weighted average shares outstanding used in the basic net income per share computations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 18,473,871. In determining the number of shares used in computing diluted loss per share, the Company added approximately 1,725,000 potentially dilutive securities for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The potentially dilutive securities added were mostly attributable to the warrants, and convertible preferred shares outstanding. As a result, the diluted income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.02.

Derivative financial instruments

On October 1, 2001, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815-10”), which requires that all derivative instruments be recognized in the financial statements at fair value. The adoption of ASC 815-10 did not have a significant impact on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments for trading purposes also. Credit risk related to the derivative financial instrument is managed by periodic settlements. Changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments are recorded as adjustments to the assets or liabilities being hedged in the statement of operations or in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether the derivative is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting, the type of hedge transaction represented and the effectiveness of the hedge.

Effect of Related Prospective Accounting Pronouncement

Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging,; Contracts in Entity’s own Equity (“ASC 815-40”) became effective for the Company on October 1, 2009. The Company’s Series A (convertible) Preferred Stock has certain reset provisions that require the Company to reduce the conversion price of the Series A (convertible) Preferred Stock if the Company issues equity at a price less than the conversion price. Upon the effective date, the provisions of ASC 815-40 required a reclassification to liability based on the reset feature of the agreements if the Company sells equity at a price below the conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock.

Therefore, in accordance with ASC 815-40, the Company determined the fair value of the initial reset provision of $453,711 at April 15, 2010 using the Black-Scholes formula assuming no dividends, a risk-free interest rate of 4.00%, expected volatility of 176.1%, and expected life of 1 years. The net value of the reset provision at the date of adoption of ASC 815-40 was recorded as a reset derivative liability on the balance sheet in the amount of $453,711 and a reduction to series A convertible redeemable preferred stock. Changes in fair value are recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date.

The fair value of the reset provision of $249,884 at June 30, 2010 was determined using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

Dividend yield:	-0-	%
Volatility	176.1	%
Risk free rate:	4.00	%

The change in fair value of the reset derivative and warrant liability resulted in a current period non operating charge to operations of $203,827.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company adopted ~~Accounting~~the ~~Standards~~fair value recognition provisions Accounting Standard Codification ~~subtopic~~sub-topic 718-10, ~~Compensation~~ (“ASC 718-10”), ~~Accounting for Stock-Based~~ Compensation, to account for compensation costs under our stock option plans. In adopting ~~ASC~~SFAS ~~718-10~~No. 123(R), ~~company~~we elected to use the modified prospective method to account for the transition from the intrinsic value method to the fair value recognition method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized from the adoption date forward for all new stock options granted and for any outstanding unvested awards as if the fair value method had been applied to those awards as of the date of grant. We had no outstanding unvested awards at the adoption date or earlier period. The Company uses the fair value method for equity ~~instruments~~ instruments granted to non-employees and uses the Black Scholes model for measuring the fair value. The stock based fair value compensation is determined as of the date of the grant or the date at which the performance of the services is completed (measurement date) and is recognized over the periods in which the ~~related~~ related services are rendered.

Comprehensive Income

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 220-10, Comprehensive Income (“ASC 220-10”). ASC 220-10 establishes standards for the reporting and displaying of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owners sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. ASC 220-10 requires other comprehensive income (loss) to include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities.

Segment Information

Accounting Standards Codification subtopic Segment Reporting 280-10 (“ASC 280-10”) establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information for those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. ASC 280-10 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance. The information disclosed herein materially represents all of the financial information related to the Company’s principal operating segment.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value

In January 2008, the Company adopted the Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”) which defines fair value for accounting purposes, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. The Company’s adoption of ASC 825-10 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. Fair value is defined as an exit price, which is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial assets and liabilities with readily available, actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and require less judgment in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial assets and liabilities that are rarely traded or not quoted have less price observability and are generally measured at fair value using valuation models that require more judgment. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency of the asset, liability or market and the nature of the asset or liability. AtThe ~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the~~ Company did ~~not~~ have ~~any~~ financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis refer note T.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period data to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported income.

New Accounting Pronouncements

OnIn March ~~February 24~~2010, ~~2010~~the FASB issued new accounting guidance, ~~Financial~~under ~~Accounting~~ASC ~~Standards~~Topic ~~Board (“FASB”)~~605 on Revenue Recognition. This standard provides that the ~~FASB~~milestone ~~issued~~method is ~~guidance~~a invalid application of the ~~“Subsequent~~proportional ~~Events”~~performance ~~topic~~model offor revenue recognition if the ~~FASC~~milestones toare ~~provide~~substantive and there is substantive ~~updates~~uncertainty ~~including:~~about ~~(1) requiring~~whether the ~~company~~milestones towill ~~evaluate~~be achieved. Determining ~~subsequent~~whether ~~events~~a milestone is substantive requires ~~through~~judgment that should be made at the ~~date~~inception inof ~~which~~the arrangement. To meet the ~~financial~~definition ~~statements~~of ~~are~~a ~~issued;~~substantive ~~(2) amending~~milestone, the consideration earned by achieving the ~~glossary~~milestone of(1) would have to be commensurate with either the ~~“Subsequent~~level of ~~Events”~~effort ~~topic~~required to ~~include~~achieve the ~~definition~~milestone ofor ~~“SEC filer”~~the ~~and~~enhancement ~~exclude~~in the ~~definition~~value of the ~~“Public~~item ~~entity”;~~delivered, (2) would have to relate solely to past performance, and (3) ~~eliminating~~ ~~the~~should ~~requirement~~be reasonable relative to ~~disclose~~all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement. No ~~date~~bifurcation ~~through~~of ~~which~~an ~~subsequent~~individual ~~events~~milestone ~~have~~is ~~been~~allowed and ~~evaluated.~~there ~~This~~can ~~guidance~~be ~~was~~more ~~prospectively~~than ~~effective~~one ~~upon~~milestone ~~issuance.~~in an arrangement. The ~~adoption~~standard ofis ~~this~~effective ~~guidance~~for ~~did~~interim ~~not~~and ~~impact~~annual ~~the~~periods beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company’s ~~results~~is ofcurrently ~~operations~~evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial ~~condition~~ statements.

In ~~January~~ February 2010, the FASB issued ~~FASB~~ ASU No. 2010-0609, ~~“Improving~~which ~~Disclosures~~updates ~~about Fair Value Measurements”, FASB to amend~~ the ~~disclosure requirements related to~~ ~~recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The~~ guidance ~~requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 (quoted prices~~ in ~~active~~ASC ~~market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2~~855, ~~(significant~~Subsequent ~~other observable inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy~~Events, ~~including~~ ~~the~~such ~~reasons~~that ~~and~~companies ~~the~~that ~~timing~~file ofwith the ~~transfers. Additionally,~~SEC ~~the~~will no ~~guidance~~longer ~~requires~~be arequired ~~roll~~to ~~forward~~indicate ~~of activities on purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of~~ the ~~assets~~date ~~and~~through ~~liabilities~~which ~~measured~~they ~~using~~have ~~significant~~analyzed ~~unobservable~~subsequent ~~inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements)~~events. ~~The~~This updated guidance became effective ~~for~~immediately ~~us with the reporting period beginning January 1, 2010,~~upon ~~except~~issuance ~~for~~and ~~the~~was ~~disclosure~~adopted onas ~~the~~of ~~roll forward activities for Level 3 fair value measurements, which will become effective for us with~~ the ~~reporting~~first ~~period beginning~~quarter ~~July 1, 2011. Other than requiring additional disclosures, adoption~~ of ~~this new guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements~~2010.

In ~~October~~February ~~2009,~~2010 the FASB issued ~~FASB~~Update ~~ASU~~ No. ~~2009~~2010-~~13,~~08 ~~Revenue~~Technical ~~Recognition~~Corrections ~~(Topic 605):~~to ~~“Multiple Deliverable~~Various ~~Revenue~~Topics ~~Arrangements – A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.~~(“2010-08”). ~~This~~2010-08 ~~standard~~represents ~~provides~~technical ~~application~~corrections ~~guidance~~to ~~on whether multiple~~SEC ~~deliverables~~paragraphs ~~exist,~~within ~~how~~various ~~the~~sections ~~deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units~~ of ~~accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining~~ the ~~selling price of a deliverable~~Codification. ~~The~~Management ~~selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence~~ is ~~not available, or estimated selling price~~currently ifevaluating ~~neither~~whether ~~vendor-specific~~these orchanges ~~third-party~~will ~~evidence~~have isany ~~available.~~material ASU 2009-13 may be applied retrospectively or prospectively for new or materially modified arrangements in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its ~~consolidated~~ financial position, ~~and~~ results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures—Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“2010-06”). 2010-06 requires new disclosures regarding significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and disclosures regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, on a gross basis, for Level 3 fair value measurements. 2010-06 also calls for further disaggregation of all assets and liabilities based on line items shown in the statement of financial position. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating whether adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-05 Compensation—Stock Compensation—Escrowed Share Arrangements and Presumption of Compensation (“2010-05”). 2010-05 re-asserts that the Staff of the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC Staff”) has stated the presumption that for certain shareholders escrowed share represent a compensatory arrangement. 2010-05 further clarifies the criteria required to be met to establish a position different from the SEC Staff’s position. The Company does not believe this pronouncement will have any material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-04 Accounting for Various Topics—Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs (“2010-04”). 2010-04 represents technical corrections to SEC paragraphs within various sections of the Codification. Management is currently evaluating whether these changes will have any material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-02 Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary—a Scope Clarification (“2010-02”) an update of ASC 810 Consolidation . 2010-02 clarifies the scope of ASC 810 with respect to decreases in ownership in a subsidiary to those of a subsidiary or group of assets that are a business or nonprofit, a subsidiary that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture, and an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity to a non-controlling interest including an equity method investee or a joint venture. Management does not expect adoption of this standard to have any material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or operating cash flows. Management does not intend to decrease its ownership in any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-01 Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“2010-03”) an update of ASC 505 Equity . 2010-03 clarifies the treatment of stock distributions as dividends to shareholders and their affect on the computation of earnings per shares. Management does not expect adoption of this standard to have any material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or operating cash flows.

On February 24, 2010, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) the FASB issued guidance in the “Subsequent Events” topic of the FASC to provide updates including: (1) requiring the company to evaluate subsequent events through the date in which the financial statements are issued; (2) amending the glossary of the “Subsequent Events” topic to include the definition of “SEC filer” and exclude the definition of “Public entity”; and (3) eliminating the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This guidance was prospectively effective upon issuance. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the Company’s results of operations of financial condition.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

NOTE D – CONTRACT RECEIVABLES

Contract receivables at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consist of the followings:

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Contracts receivables	$	32,~~250~~277,~~537~~794		$	32,~~245~~396,~~701~~783
Retention receivables		~~580~~443,~~349~~165			~~664~~313,~~350~~196
Less: Allowance for doubtful Accts		(110,000	)		(60,000	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(100,000	)		(50,000	)
	$	32,~~720~~620,~~886~~959		$	32,~~850~~659,~~051~~979

NOTE E – UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, costs, estimated earnings, and billings on uncompleted contracts are summarized as follows:

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Costs incurred to date on uncompleted contracts	$	85,~~153~~304,~~160~~567		$	1916,~~169~~495,~~775~~273
Estimated earnings		1789,~~176,529~~902			32,~~422~~760,~~931~~852
		9,329,689			22,592,706
		6,094,469			19,256,125
Less: billed revenue to date		(95,~~379~~995,~~240~~052	)		~~(22~~19,~~531~~330,~~396~~455	)
Net	$	(49,551	)	$	61,310
Under (over) billings, net	$	99,417		$	(74,329	)
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings	$	~~396~~322,~~230~~976		$	~~306~~123,~~073~~185
Less: accruals on uncompleted contracts		(~~445~~223,~~781~~559	)		(~~244~~197,~~763~~514	)
Net	$	(49,551	)	$	61,310
Under (over) billings, net	$	99,417		$	(74,329	)

NOTE F – BACKLOG

The following schedule summarizes changes in backlog on contracts from January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010. Backlog represents the amount of revenue the Company expects to realize from work to be performed on uncompleted contracts in progress at year end and from contractual agreements on which work has not yet begun.

Backlog balance at January 1, 2009	$	4,089,892
New contracts for the year ended December 31, 2009		23,556,981
Add: contract adjustments		1,672,307
Less: revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009		(18,609,920	)
Backlog balance at December 31, 2009	$	10,709,260
New contracts for the quarter ended March 31, 2010		2,454,515
Add: contract adjustments		373,413
Less: revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2010		(4,109,946	)
Backlog balance at March 31, 2010	$	9,427,242

NOTE F – BACKLOG

The following schedule summarizes changes in backlog on contracts from January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. Backlog represents the amount of revenue the Company expects to realize from work to be performed on uncompleted contracts in progress at year end and from contractual agreements on which work has not yet begun. The Conesco figure are not included in below table refer note A and note U.

Backlog balance at January 1, 2009	$	4,089,892
New contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2009		5,522,483
Add: contract adjustments		83,245
Less: revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009		(7,632,638	)
Backlog balance at June 30, 2009	$	2,062,982

Backlog balance at January 1, 2010	$	8,324,093
New contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2010		3,553,470
Add: contract adjustments		235,367
Less: revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010		(7,159,939	)
Backlog balance at June 30, 2010	$	4,952,991

NOTE G – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Major classes of property and equipment at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009 ~~consist~~ consist of the followings:

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Vehicles	$	196,948		$	196,~~948~~949
Leasehold improvements		~~232~~237,~~629~~013			232,~~629~~628
Office equipments		~~215~~208,~~792~~279			~~215~~208,~~792~~279
Tools and other equipment		228,672			228,672
		874,041			874,041
		870,912			866,528
Less: accumulated depreciation		~~(600~~625,~~578~~433	)		~~(571~~568,~~394~~387	)
Net Property and Equipment	$	~~273~~245,~~463~~479		$	~~302~~298,~~647~~141

Depreciation expense was $2957,~~184~~029 and $1022,~~998~~755 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $28,472 and $11,757 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

NOTE H – – INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

~~Total~~Intangibles ~~identifiable~~consist ~~intangible~~of ~~assets~~a ~~acquired~~non-compete agreement and ~~their~~the ~~carrying~~customer ~~values at March 31, 2010 are:~~list.

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization/ Impairment			Net		Residual Value		Weighted Average Amortization Period (Years)
Amortized Identifiable Intangible Assets: Jones Fire non compete	$	20,000	$	(20,000	)	$	-		-		5.0
Total Amortized identifiable Intangible Assets		20,000		(20,000	)		-				5.0
Total	$	20,000	$	(20,000	)	$	-	$	-

The following summarizes intangible assets at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired and their carrying values at March 31, 2010 are:

	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Goodwill	$	331,075	$	331,075
Intangibles: Customer List		283,979		283,979
Less: accumulated amortization		276,091		181,431
Net Intangibles	$	338,963	$	433,623

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization/ Impairment			Net		Residual Value		Weighted Average Amortization Period (Years)
Intangible Assets and Goodwill:
Amortized Identifiable Intangible Assets: Conesco backlog, customer lists	$	283,979	$	(228,761	)	$	55,218	$	-		1.5
Total Amortized identifiable Intangible Assets		283,979		(228,761	)		55,218				1.5
Goodwill - Conesco		331,075		-			331,075		-
Total	$	615,054	$	(228,761	)	$	386,293	$	-

Total amortization expense charged to operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $47,330 and $25,625, respectively. Estimated amortization expense as of March 31, 2010 is as follows:

Period Ended December 31, 2010		$	55,218
Total		$	55,218

The Company does not amortize goodwill. The Company recorded goodwill in the amount of $331,075 as a result of the acquisitions of Conesco, Inc. during the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment based on the fair value of the operating business units to which this goodwill relates at least once a year. The Company generally determines the fair value of a reporting unit using a combination of the income approach, which is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, and the market approach, which compares the business unit's multiples to its competitors. At March 31, 2010, the Company has determined that the value of Conesco’s goodwill is fairly valued.

The estimated fair value of our goodwill could change if the Company is unable to achieve operating results at the levels that have been forecasted, the market valuation of our business decreases based on transactions involving similar companies, or there is a permanent, negative change in the market demand for the services offered by the Company. These changes could result in a further impairment of the existing goodwill balance that could require a material non-cash charge to our results of operations.

On January 16, 2009, the Company entered in to an agreement for the exchange of common stock (“merger”) with the shareholders of Conesco (“Conesco Shareholders”) and Conesco, Inc. (“Conesco”). The Company issued 3,000,000 restricted shares of its common stock valued at $381,000 in exchange for all outstanding shares of Conesco. Conesco became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

The total purchase price and carrying value of net assets acquired was $381,000. The Company recognized customer list as intangible assets in connection with the transaction. At the time of the acquisition, there was no active market for the Company’s common stock. As a result, the Company’s management estimated the fair value of the shares issued based on a valuation model, which management believes approximates the fair value of the net assets acquired.

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations, the total purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The estimate of fair value of the assets acquired was based on management’s estimates. The Company plans to utilize a valuation specialist to re-estimate these values in the near future and accordingly, these value estimates may change in the near future. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired as follows:14

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 805-10, Business Combinations (ASC 805-10), the total purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The estimate of fair value of the assets acquired was based on management’s estimates. The Company plans to utilize a valuation specialist to re-estimate these values in the near future and accordingly, these value estimates may change in the near future. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired as follows:

Cash and other current assets	$	338,435
Equipment and other assets		6,505
Intangible assets		615,054
Liabilities		(578,994	)
Total purchase price	$	381,000

Intangibles of $615,054 represented the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired. The Company will amortize the intangibles over 5 years and will review the value of the intangibles to ~~account~~ account for any possible impairment as per guidance in ~~SFAS~~ASC ~~142~~350 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and beyond until the value of the asset is ~~deemed~~ deemed impaired. Also refer to note U for discontinued operating relating to Conesco.

The following data presents unaudited pro forma revenues, net loss and basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock for the Company as if the acquisitions discussed above, had occurred on January 1, 2008. The Company has prepared these pro forma financial results for comparative purposes only. These pro forma financial results may not be indicative of the results that would have occurred if the Company had completed these acquisitions at the beginning of the periods shown below or the results that will be attained in the future.

	Year Ended December 31, 2008
	As Reported		Pro Forma Adjustments			Pro Forma
Revenues	$	16,487,525	$	1,016,187		$	17,503,712
Net income (loss)	$	6,578	$	(123,681	)	$	(117,103	)
Net loss per common share outstanding - basic & diluted	$	.00	$	.00		$	(.01	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic & diluted		10,100,000					10,100,000

NOTE I – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Accounts payable	$	32,~~372~~555,~~694~~161		$	2,~~674~~170,~~443~~134
Accrued payroll and vacation		(721,~~999~~171	)		(1611,~~343~~915	)
Accrued payroll taxes		63,~~851~~457			74
Other liabilities		91139,~~056~~141			55,666
Total	$	32,~~519~~778,~~602~~930		$	2,~~713~~213,~~840~~959

NOTE J – BANK ~~LINE~~LINES OF CREDIT

The Company has a line of credit with Westamerica Bank in the amount of $1,000,000. The line of credit is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and guaranteed by the Company’s principal stockholders. In addition, entities owned and controlled by the Company’s principal stockholders are co-makers of the line of credit and have pledged substantially all of the assets as security for the line of credit (see Note NO). The line of credit bears interest at the Bank rate minus 0.5%, per annum, with interest due and payable monthly and expires on June 30, 2010. The balance outstanding under the line of credit at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009 amounted to $1,000,000 and $900,000 respectively, leaving a balance available on the line of $0 and $100,000, respectively. The Company is required to maintain certain bank loan covenants. At ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company was not in compliance with certain bank loan covenants. The Company received a 60 day extension on the line of credit as paperwork is updated for renewal of the line.

NOTE K – NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Note payable to Bank, interest at 7.76% per annum; secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets; with monthly principal and interest payments of $13,133.99, due February, 2012. The Note is guaranteed by the Company’s principal stockholders. In addition, entities owned and controlled by the Company’s principal stockholders are co-makers of the Note and have pledged substantially all of their assets as security for the Note (see Note N).	$	278,583		$	312,009
Note payable to Bank, interest at 7.76% per annum; secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets; with monthly principal and interest payments of $13,133.99, due February, 2012. The Note is guaranteed by the Company’s principal stockholders. In addition, entities owned and controlled by the Company’s principal stockholders are co-makers of the Note and have pledged substantially all of their assets as security for the Note (see Note O).	$	244,612		$	312,009
Note payable to Bank, interest at 5.5% per annum; secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets; with monthly principal and interest payments of $4,785.24, due December, 2013. The Note is guaranteed by the Company’s principal stockholders. In addition, entities owned and controlled by the Company’s principal stockholders are co-makers of the Note and have pledged substantially all of their assets as security for the Note (see Note N).		193,519			205,083
Note payable to Bank, interest at 5.5% per annum; secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets; with monthly principal and interest payments of $4,785.24, due December, 2013. The Note is guaranteed by the Company’s principal stockholders. In addition, entities owned and controlled by the Company’s principal stockholders are co-makers of the Note and have pledged substantially all of their assets as security for the Note (see Note O).		181,829			205,083
Note payable to Bank, interest at 8.0% per annum; secured by substantially all of the Conesco assets; with monthly principal and interest payments of $3,766.86, due August, 2012. The Note is guaranteed by the Company’s principal stockholders.		103,152			110,373
Note payable to three individuals, interest at 9.0% per annum, the Notes Unsecured, with principal and interest due on or about June 30, 2010		42,500			—
Total note payable		575,254			627,465
Total notes payable		468,941			517,092
Less: current portion		~~(216~~233,~~728~~809	)		~~(213~~184,~~394~~512	)
Notes payable – long term	$	~~358~~235,~~526~~132		$	~~414~~332,~~071~~580

Aggregate maturities of long-term debt as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 are as follows:

Year ended	Amount
March 31, 2011	$	216,728
June 30, 2011	$	233,809
March 31, 2012		217,791
June 30, 2012		152,846
March 31, 2013		98,732
June 30, 2013		54,090
March 31, 2014		42,003
June 30, 2014		28,196
Total	$	~~575~~468,~~254~~941

NOTE L – ~~CAPITAL~~PREFERRED STOCK

~~The~~We have ~~Company~~designated ~~is authorized to issue 70~~40,000~~,000~~ shares of ~~common~~preferred stock ~~with~~as ~~$0.001~~Series ~~par value~~A ~~per~~convertible ~~share.~~redeemable preferred Asstock ofno ~~March~~par 31value, ~~2010~~which ~~and~~may ~~December~~be ~~31,~~issued ~~2009~~in one or more sub-series, and have authorized the ~~Company~~issuance ~~had 18~~of 23,~~074,852~~000 shares of ~~common~~Series ~~stock~~A ~~issued~~convertible ~~and~~redeemable preferred ~~outstanding~~stock. ~~During~~ ~~the three~~The ~~months~~Series ~~ended~~A ~~March~~Preferred ~~31,~~Stock ~~2010,~~is ~~the~~convertible ~~Company~~into ~~recorded~~shares ~~compensation~~of ~~cost~~our common stock at a conversion price of ~~approximately~~ $110.50 per share,~~400~~ ~~relating~~subject to ~~shares~~adjustment ~~issued~~for customary ~~during~~anti-dilution provisions. Holder may redeem the ~~year~~Series ~~ended~~A ~~December~~Preferred ~~31,~~Stock ~~2009~~partially ~~and~~or ~~vested~~in ~~during~~full at the ~~quarter~~purchase ~~ended~~price ~~March~~subject 31to the holder’s conversion rights or redemption rights. The Series A Preferred Stock accrues dividends at an annual rate of 10% per annum, ~~2010~~payable quarterly, ~~after~~either ~~adjustments~~in cash ~~for~~or, ~~the~~at ~~termination~~our ~~and~~election, ~~service~~shares ~~changes~~of ~~etc~~our common stock.

~~NOTE~~During MApril -2010, ~~RELATED~~we ~~PARTY~~sold 23,000 ~~TRANSACTIONS~~shares in a private placement at a price of $25 per share. The total purchase price was $575,000 and the proceeds to our company, net of commissions paid to our investment advisor, were approximately $523,125. The investors received $287,500 in warrants to purchase common stock. Each warrant is exercisable for a period of five years, with an exercise price of $0.50. Since the Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock may ultimately be redeemed at the option of the holder, the carrying value of the preferred stock, net of discount and accumulated dividends, has been classified as temporary equity on the balance sheet at June 30, 2010.

~~Two primary~~In ~~stockholders of the Company are co-owners of an entity that provides~~July ~~charter air services~~2010, ~~and on occasion,~~ the Company ~~utilizes~~amended ~~this~~the ~~entity~~purchase ~~for~~and ~~air travel~~warrant ~~services~~agreement into ~~connection~~amend ~~with~~ the ~~Company’s contracting. During~~strike ~~the three~~price ~~months ended~~on ~~March 31, 2010 and 2009,~~ the ~~Company~~warrants ~~incurred and~~from ~~charged~~$0.50 to ~~operations~~ $~~2,311~~0.35 ~~and~~per ~~$23,457, respectively, in connection with air travel services provided by the entities to the Company~~share. All ~~There~~other ~~were no~~terms ~~payables~~remained ~~owed to~~ the ~~entities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively~~same.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No.00-27, “Application of EITF Issue No. 98-5, ‘Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Rates’, to Certain Convertible Instruments “, a portion of the proceeds were allocated to the warrants based on their relative fair value, which totaled $204,786 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. Further, we attributed a beneficial conversion feature of $453,710 to the Series A preferred shares based upon the difference between the effective conversion price of those shares and the closing price of our common shares on the date of issuance. The assumptions used in the Black Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 176.1%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 4%, and (4) expected life of 1 year as the conversion feature and warrants are immediately exercisable. The expected term of the warrants represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards and giving consideration to the contractual terms. The amounts attributable to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature, aggregating $453,710, have been recorded as a discount and deducted from the face value of the preferred stock. Since the preferred stock is classified as temporary equity, we are amortizing the discount over the period of one year (the initial redemption date) as a charge to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings). The charge to additional paid in capital for 2010 was $93,228.

NOTE M – CAPITAL STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 70,000,000 shares of common stock with $0.001 par value per share. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had 18,532,808 and 18,593,880 shares of common stock issued and outstanding respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded compensation cost of approximately $24,200 relating to shares issued during the year ended December 31, 2009 and vested during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, after adjustments for the termination and service changes etc.

In April 2010, the Company sold 23,000 shares of Series A 10% Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value, for $575,000 to two accredited investors. The investors also received 575,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. The warrants expire five years from date of issuance, April 2015.

NOTE N – WARRANTS

Transactions involving our warrant issuances are summarized as follows:

	2010				2009
	Number		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of the period		-	$	-		-	$	-
Granted during the period		575,000		0.50		-		-
Exercised during the period		-		-		-		-
Terminated during the period		-		-		-		-
Outstanding at end of the period		575,000	$	0.50		-	$	-
Exercisable at end of the period		575,000	$	0.50		-	$	-

The number and weighted average exercise prices of our options and warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2010 is as follows:

Range of Exercise Prices		Remaining Number Outstanding			Weighted Average Contractual Life (Years)			Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.50			575,000			4.75		$	0.50

NOTE O - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Two primary stockholders of the Company are co-owners of an entity that provides charter air services, and on occasion, the Company utilizes this entity for air travel services in connection with the Company’s contracting. During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred and charged to operations $1,848 and $24,502, respectively, in connection with air travel services provided by the entities to the Company. There were no payables owed to the entities at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

The entities are co-makers of a line of credit and a note payable and have pledged substantiality all of their assets to secure the line of credit (See Note J) and note payable (see Note K).

~~NOTE N - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES~~17

NOTE P - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Lease Commitments

The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating leases that expire through ~~November~~December 2011. The Company also leases vehicles from Enterprise Fleet Services under non-cancelable operating leases expiring through March 2013.

The Company also leases vehicles from Enterprise Fleet Services under non-cancelable operating leases expiring through March 2013.

Future minimum lease payments for the above leases over the next four years are as follows:

2010	$	268,608
	Amount
2011	$	~~139~~237,~~112~~688
2012		1693,~~495~~269
2013		412,~~489~~133
Total	$	428,704
2014		2,993
Total	$	346,083

For the ~~three~~six ~~months~~month ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, rent expense was $4089,~~332~~630 and $4064,~~837~~164, respectively. For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, vehicle lease expense was $5594,~~444~~419 and $7597,~~024~~478, respectively.

Litigation

The Company is not currently in any litigation.

~~Surety~~NOTE ~~Bonds~~Q – SEGMENT INFORMATION

~~A certain~~The ~~number~~Company is managed by specific lines of ~~our~~business ~~construction~~including ~~projects~~fire ~~require~~protection usand alarm toand ~~maintain~~detection, aelectrical, ~~surety~~telecommunications ~~bond~~and flooring. The ~~bond~~Company’s management ~~surety~~makes ~~company~~financial ~~requires~~decisions ~~additional~~and ~~guarantees~~allocates ~~for~~resources ~~issuance~~based ofon the ~~bonds. The~~information ~~two~~it ~~officers~~receives ~~(former~~from ~~owners)~~its internal management system on each of ~~Pro-Tech~~its ~~have~~lines of ~~both~~business. ~~personally~~Certain other expenses associated with the public company status ~~guaranteed~~are ~~these~~reported ~~bonds. There~~at isthe ~~currently~~Meltdown parent company level, not ~~remuneration~~within tothe subsidiaries. These expenses are reported separately in this footnote. The Company’s management relies on the internal management system to provide sales and cost ~~officers~~information ~~for~~by ~~these~~line ~~guarantees~~of business (refer to note A and note U).

~~NOTE~~Summarized Ofinancial –information ~~SEGMENT~~by ~~INFORMATION~~line of business for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, as taken from the internal management system previously discussed, is listed below. Information for the six months ended June 30, 2009 does not include any data from electrical, telecommunications or flooring, as those acquisitions/startups were not completed by those dates.

The Company is managed by specific lines of business including fire protection and alarm and detection, electrical, telecommunications and flooring. The Company’s management makes financial decisions and allocates resources based on the information it receives from its internal management system on each of its lines of business. Certain other expenses associated with the public company status are reported at the Meltdown parent company level, not within the subsidiaries. These expenses are reported separately in this footnote. The Company’s management relies on the internal management system to provide sales and cost information by line of business.

	Three months ended				Six months ended
Revenue	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	2,790,000	$	2,203,000	$	4,352,000	$	5,398,000
Telecommunications		742,000		1,313,000		1,987,000		2,025,000
Electrical		176,000		82,000		821,000		210,000
Total	$	3,708,000	$	3,598,000	$	7,160,000	$	7,633,000

Summarized financial information by line of business for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, as taken from the internal management system previously discussed, is listed below.

	Three months ended					Six months ended
Gross Profit	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	1,355,000	$	998,000		$	1,906,000		$	2,446,000
Telecommunications		113,000		286,000			371,000			550,000
Electrical		107,000		(19,000	)		(158,000	)		(42,000	)
Total	$	1,575,000	$	1,265,000		$	2,119,000		$	2,954,000

Revenue
	Three months ended						Six months ended
	March 31, 2010			March 31, 2009
Operating Income (Loss)	June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	1767,~~563,~~000		$	3256,~~238,~~000		$	603,000		$	708,000
Telecommunications		142,~~245,~~000			~~712~~110,000			182,000			239,000
Flooring		657,000			327,000
Electrical		63,000			(65,000	)		(305,000	)		(115,000	)
Electrical		645,000			128,000
Corporate		(543,000	)		(742,000	)		(959,000	)		(1,184,000	)
Total	$	4329,~~110,~~000		$	4(441,~~405,~~000	)	$	(479,000	)	$	(352,000	)

Gross Profit
	March 31, 2010			March 31, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	553,000		$	1,446,000
Telecommunications		258,000			219,000
Flooring		(158,000	)		142,000
Electrical		(265,000	)		6,000
Total	$	388,000		$	1,813,000

Operating Income (Loss)
	March 31, 2010			March 31, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	(149,000	)	$	453,000
Telecommunications		139,000			130,000
Flooring		(278,000	)		99,000
Electrical		(367,000	)		(50,000	)
Corporate		(440,000	)		(427,000	)
Total	$	(1,095,000	)	$	205,000

Depreciation/Amortization
	March 31, 2010		March 31, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	7,000	$	7,000
Telecommunications		5,000		-
Flooring		1,000		-
Electrical		-		-
Corporate		64,000		30,000
Total	$	77,000	$	37,000

Interest
	March 31, 2010		March 31, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	-	$	-
Telecommunications		-		-
Flooring		5,000		5,000
Electrical		-		-
Corporate		34,000		17,000
Total	$	39,000	$	22,000

Assets	As of		As of
	March 31, 2010		December 31, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	2,978,000	$	2,435,000
Telecommunications		883,000		609,000
Flooring		787,000		1,059,000
Electrical		323,000		721,000
Corporate		453,000		758,000
TOTAL	$	5,424,000	$	5,582,000

Capital Expenditures	As of		As of
	March 31, 2010		December 31, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	-	$	11,000
Telecommunications		-		-
Flooring		-		-
Electrical		-		-
Corporate		-		11,000
TOTAL	$	-	$	11,000

NOTE P- MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS

The Company had one customer who accounted for $1,236,367 or 30% of the billings for the three months ended March 31, 2010 two customers who accounted for $1,168,954 or 27% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

The Company had two vendors who accounted for $416,293 or 33% of the materials purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and two vendors who accounted for $390,574 or 44% of material costs for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

NOTE Q – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN

	Three months ended				Six months ended
Depreciation/Amortization	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	7,000	$	7,000	$	14,000	$	14,000
Telecommunications		5,000		-		9,000		-
Electrical		-		-		-		-
Corporate		85,000		36,000		150,000		65,000
Total	$	97,000	$	43,000	$	173,000	$	79,000

The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering substantially all full-time employees, which provides for the Company matching the participant's elective deferral up to 3% of their annual gross income. The Company's expense for the plan was $13,298 and $20,122, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

	Three months ended					Six months ended
Interest (Income)Expense	June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009		June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	(3,000	)	$	-	$	(3,000	)	$	-
Telecommunications		-			-		-			-
Electrical		-			-		-			-
Corporate		(178,000	)		29,000		(144,000	)		46,000
Total	$	(181,000	)	$	29,000	$	(147,000	)	$	46,000

NOTE R - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Assets	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	2,516,000	$	2,435,000
Telecommunications		458,000		609,000
Electrical		133,000		721,000
Corporate		1,494,000		758,000
Discontinued Operations		1,237,000		1,059,000
TOTAL	$	5,838,000	$	5,582,000

NONE

Capital Expenditures	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009
Fire Protection/Alarm & Detection	$	-	$	13,900
Telecommunications		-		-
Electrical		-		-
Corporate		4,367		-
TOTAL	$	4,367	$	13,900

NOTE R - MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS

The Company had two customers accounting for 41% of the total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and two customers which accounted for 26% of the total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company had two customers accounting for 35% of the total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and two jobs which accounted for 46% of the total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The Company often has multiple jobs running under some customers, but the jobs will have different owners and therefore should not necessarily be considered one customer from the standpoint of concentration of risk.

Purchases from the Company’s two major vendors accounted for 57% of materials purchases for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and were approximately 46% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Purchases from the Company’s two major vendors accounted for 85% of purchases for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and were approximately 36% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. There are multiple vendors available to get materials and the Company does not run a risk of shortage due to the loss of any of the vendors.

NOTE S – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN

The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering substantially all full-time employees, which provides for the Company matching the participant’s elective deferral up to 3% of their annual gross income. The Company’s expense for the plan was $13,407 and $40,251, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2008, respectively. In April 2010, the Company suspended the matching portion of the 401(k) plan.

NOTE T — FAIR VALUE

ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Items recorded or measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the accompanying consolidated financial statements consisted of the following items as of June 30, 2010:

	Total			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments Level 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3 (A)
Liabilities
Warrant liability		(133,658	)		-		-		(133,658	)
Reset derivative		(116,226	)		-		-		(116,226	)
Total	$	(249,884	)	$	-	$	-	$	(249,884	)

(A)	Fair value is estimated based on internally-developed models or methodologies utilizing significant inputs that are unobservable from objective sources.

Level 3 Liabilities comprised of our bifurcated reset provision contained within our Series C stock and the fair value of issued warrants with reset provisions.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities as of June 30, 2010:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

	Warrant Liability		Reset Derivative
Balance, December 31, 2009	$	-	$	-
Total (gains) losses
Warrants issued with Redeemable Preferred Series A		204,786		-
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Series A				248,924
Mark-to-market at June 30, 2010:
- Series A Preferred Stock Reset Derivative				(132,698)
- Warrants issued with Convertible Redeemable Preferred Series A		(71,128)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—		—

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	133,658	$	116,225

Total gain for the period included in earnings relating to the liabilities held at June 30, 2010	$	71,128	$	132,698

NOTE U - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 31, 2010, the Company entered into a letter of intent to sell the stock of Conesco, Inc. to its prior owner upon the terms and subject to the conditions of a definitive agreement. The final terms of the definitive agreement are in the process of being finalized and management projects the completion of project to complete the sale on or about August 31, 2010. The letter of intent is non-binding and either side may terminate with written notice.

~~Unless~~In July ~~otherwise~~the ~~noted,~~Company ~~references~~entered ininto ~~this~~an ~~Form~~amendment ~~10-Q~~of tothe ~~“Pro-Tech”,~~Series ~~“we”,~~A ~~“us”,~~Puchase ~~“our”,~~agreement to ~~and~~change the ~~“Company”~~strike ~~means~~price ~~Pro-Tech~~on ~~Industries,~~the ~~Inc.,~~conversion aand ~~Nevada~~warrant ~~corporation~~shares from $0. 50 to ~~Our~~$0.35. This ~~principal~~price ~~place~~reset ofwill ~~business~~increase isthe ~~located~~number atof ~~8550~~warrants ~~Younger~~for ~~Creek~~the financing ~~Drive~~from #2575, ~~Sacramento~~000 to 821,427 CAcommon ~~95828~~shares available to purchase. ~~Our~~ No ~~telephone~~other ~~number~~terms isof ~~(916)~~the ~~388-0255~~agreement were changed.

Subsequent events have been evaluated through August 16, 2010, a date that the financial statements were issued. All appropriate subsequent event disclosures, if any have been made in notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this registration statement. Portions of this document that are not statements of historical or current fact are forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. The cautionary statements made in this registration statement should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this registration statement. From time to time, we may publish forward-looking statements relative to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this section or elsewhere in this report are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: changes in the economy or in specific customer industry sectors; changes in customer procurement policies and practices; changes in product manufacturer sales policies and practices; the availability of product and labor; changes in operating expenses; the effect of price increases or decreases; the variability and timing of business opportunities including acquisitions, alliances, customer agreements and supplier authorizations; our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other business strategies; the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities in connection with acquisitions; changes in accounting policies and practices; the effect of organizational changes within the Company; the emergence of new competitors, including firms with greater financial resources than ours; adverse state and federal regulation and legislation; and the occurrence of extraordinary events, including natural events and acts of God, fires, floods and accidents.

Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors and risks that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those identified in the section titled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as well as other factors that we are currently unable to identify or quantify, but that may exist in the future.

In addition, the foregoing factors may affect generally our business, results of operations and financial position. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

On December 31, 2008, we executed an agreement with Pro-Tech Fire Protection Systems Corp (“Pro-Tech Fire” or “Pro-Tech Fire Protection Systems”), and our company (the "“Agreement"”), whereby pursuant to the terms and conditions of that Agreement, Pro-Tech Fire shareholders acquired ten million one hundred thousand (10,100,000) shares of our common stock, whereby Pro-Tech Fire would become a wholly owned subsidiary of our company. The predecessor to our company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 4, 2007, and was a development stage company with the principal business ~~objective~~ objective of becoming a chain of professional body treatment and skin care ~~service~~ service centers. On May 8, 2009 at our annual meeting, the stockholders ~~and~~ and board of directors approved and officially changed our name to Pro-Tech Industries, Inc.

Pro-Tech Fire was incorporated on May 4, 1995 under the laws of the State of California to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to; installation, repair and inspections of fire protection systems in commercial, military and industrial settings.

PRO-TECH FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS CORP

Pro-Tech Fire Protection Systems is a full-service contractor serving the western United States, with offices in California and Nevada. Services include estimating, designing, fabricating, and installing all types of standard and specialty water-based fire protection systems. In addition, our company offers “Day Work” services, including inspecting, testing, repairing and servicing of same.

We serve the new construction market, as well as customers retro-fitting, upgrading or repairing their existing facilities, bringing existing facilities to current standards (for example, installing sprinklers at a customer’s expanded storage warehouse, etc.).

Pro-Tech Fire services include:

¨· Commercial, Special Hazards, and Industrial Overhead Wet Pipe, Dry Pipe, Pre-Action, Deluge, and Foam · New Installations, Retro-Fits, Upgrades, Repairs, Design, Consultations, and Analysis

¨ New Installations, Retro-Fits, Upgrades, Repairs, Design, Consultations, and Analysis

	·	Pumps, Hydrants, Backflow Preventers, Underground, Design, and Consultation

	·	5 Year Certification, Inspections and Testing

¨ Pumps, Hydrants, Backflow Preventers, Underground, Design, and Consultation

	·	24 Hour Service

	·	Alarm & Detection installation, inspections and repairs, and third party monitoring

¨· 5Electrical ~~Year~~Services ~~Certification~~including design build, ~~Inspections~~new construction, repairs, inspections and ~~Testing~~maintenance · Network cabling, system and structure testing and data networking and design

¨ 24 Hour Service

¨ Alarm & Detection installation, inspections and repairs, and third party monitoring

¨ Electrical Services including design build, new construction, repairs, inspections and maintenance

¨ Network cabling, system and structure testing and data networking and design

Pro-Tech Telecommunications

Pro-Tech Telecommunications provides inside/outside plant installation/implementation services, telecommunications hardware/software deployment (voice systems), maintenance support services, on-site technicians for telecommunications upgrades, and cable system design services. In addition, Pro-Tech Telecommunications also has a full data networking group that can design, configure, and deploy custom data networking solutions based on individual client needs. Pro-Tech Telecommunications provides the following services to commercial, government and other business enterprises.

Services Offered:

Infrastructure Systems/Services

¨· Building Riser and Campus Systems · Cabinet and Rack Installation

¨· ~~Cabinet~~Cable Tagging and ~~Rack~~Documentation ~~Installation~~· Communications Rooms, MDF, IDF

¨· Optical and Copper Cable ~~Tagging~~Installation ~~and~~· ~~Documentation~~Raceway Systems

¨· ~~Communications~~Wireless ~~Rooms,~~Connectivity ~~MDF, IDF~~Solutions

¨ Optical and Copper Cable Installation

¨ Raceway Systems

¨ Wireless Connectivity Solutions

Low Voltage Systems

¨· Security Systems · Fire Alarm

¨· ~~Fire~~Card ~~Alarm~~Access Control · CATV

¨· ~~Card~~Video ~~Access Control~~Surveillance

¨ CATV

¨ Video Surveillance

Network Systems

¨· Enterprise architecture strategy · Systems integration

¨· ~~Systems~~IT ~~integration~~infrastructure, implementation, and support · Network security and remote access solutions

¨· ~~IT infrastructure, implementation, and support~~Authentication

¨ Network security and remote access solutions

¨ Authentication

Voice Systems

¨· PBX · Key system

¨· ~~Key system~~VoIP

¨We differentiate ~~VoIP~~ourselves through our commitment to the highest degree of structure, efficiency and quality practices. We are experts at providing solutions that precisely fit our client’s needs. We do not manufacture equipment and are vendor agnostic when providing equipment solutions (i.e. we will install customer or vendor owned/provided equipment). Our mission is to provide cost-effective, high quality services and solutions to enhance the competitive position of our clients, using creative and innovative approaches.

We differentiate ourselves through our commitment to the highest degree of structure, efficiency and quality practices. We are experts at providing solutions that precisely fit our client's needs. We do not manufacture equipment and are vendor agnostic when providing equipment solutions (i.e. we will install customer or vendor owned/provided equipment). Our mission is to provide cost-effective, high quality services and solutions to enhance the competitive position of our clients, using creative and innovative approaches.22

Pro-Tech Electrical

Pro-Tech Electrical Services Division is a full service Electrical contractor providing reliable and quality workmanship throughout California. Our capacities are not limited to commercial and industrial project but, to a vast range of electrical construction projects. Our primary bid focus has been in the areas of heavy commercial such as large distribution centers, commercial retail (shopping centers, etc.), and institutional work (schools, churches, etc.) Our Management strives to provide competitive pricing for the commercial and industrial bid market. We believe we furnish detailed and competitive pricing, value engineering options, and a team approach to our clients. Pro-Tech Electrical provides the following services to commercial, government and other business enterprises:

Electrical Services

¨· Building riser and campus systems · Underground service upgrades and installation

¨· ~~Underground~~Installation ~~service~~of power switchboards services, Motor Control Centers (MCC) and/or upgrades. · New emergency generators, controls and ~~installation~~transfer switches.

¨· ~~Installation~~UPS of(Uninterruptible ~~power~~Power ~~switchboards~~Systems) ~~services,~~and ~~Motor~~upgrades. ~~Control~~· ~~Centers~~Fuse ~~(MCC)~~and Circuit Breaker upgrade and~~/or~~ ~~upgrades.~~installations

¨· ~~New~~Interior/ ~~emergency~~exterior ~~generators,~~Lighting ~~controls~~ and ~~transfer~~related ~~switches~~controls. · Site lighting installation and upgrades

¨· ~~UPS~~Security ~~(Uninterruptible~~lighting ~~Power~~· ~~Systems)~~Industrial electrical projects including explosion proof equipment and ~~upgrades~~installations.

¨· ~~Fuse~~Building riser and ~~Circuit~~campus ~~Breaker~~systems ~~upgrade~~· ~~and~~Load ~~installations~~analysis

¨· ~~Interior/~~Commercial ~~exterior Lighting~~ and ~~related~~industrial ~~controls.~~maintenance

¨ Site lighting installation and upgrades

¨ Security lighting

¨ Industrial electrical projects including explosion proof equipment and installations.

¨ Building riser and campus systems

¨ Load analysis

¨ Commercial and industrial maintenance

Conesco, Inc.

On January 16, 2009, we issued 3,000,000 shares to shareholders of Conesco, Inc. (“Conesco”), as part of an acquisition, whereby Conesco became our wholly owned subsidiary.

Since 1993, Conesco has been a provider of commercial flooring products, installation, maintenance and design consultation services to businesses throughout Northern California. In management’s opinion, our work graces some of the most prestigious properties in Northern California and beyond. Conesco’s team approach has earned it a reputation, in management’s opinion, for leading-edge flooring expertise, great service and first-class products. Conesco, Inc. offers the following products and services:

¨ Professional design and specification consultation

¨ Material and installation of carpet, resilient, ceramic stone, and wood flooring

¨ Material and installation of raised access/Clean Room flooring

¨ Modular wiring and under-floor HVAC delivery systems

¨ Ongoing maintenance services

¨ Green building consultation

¨ Consultation and expertise in complex/unique flooring installations

We believe Conesco, Inc.’s expertise in the field of commercial and industrial flooring has allowed them to work with the following premier building contractors in Northern California:

¨ Roebbelen Contracting

¨ McCarthy Construction

¨ Howard S. Wright

¨ MP Allen

Competition

The competition is divided among many players in our four markets. The market is highly fragmented and there is not a dominate player in any of the markets. Two of the larger competitors are as follows:

Cosco – Cosco is a multifaceted, full service fire protection contractor, providing design, fabrication, installation service and inspection of a wide variety of automatic fire suppression systems. The company specializes in large construction projects including hospitals, high-rise structures, hotels, large office and manufacturing facilities. The company maintains experienced staff including engineers, designers, project managers and installers. Cosco has offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Fresno, San Diego, and Anchorage.

Tyco/Grinnell (NYSE: TYC) - Tyco International, Ltd. operates as a diversified manufacturing and services company. The company, through its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and distributes electronic security and fire protection systems; electrical and electronic components; and medical devices and supplies, imaging agents, pharmaceuticals, and adult incontinence and infant care products. Tyco’s fire and security products and services include electronic security systems, fire detection systems and suppression systems, as well as fire extinguishers and related products. The company’s electrical and electronic components comprise electronic/electrical connector systems; fiber optic components; and wireless devices, such as private radio systems, heat shrink products, circuit protection devices, and magnetic devices.

Employees

We have approximately 66 full time employees including 1311 executive and administrative staff, 4 in engineering, 7 in sales and marketing, with the balance working in the field as superintendants, foreman, journeyman or apprentices.

Recent Developments

~~None~~On July 31, 2010, we entered into a letter of intent to sell the stock of Conesco, Inc. to its prior owner upon the terms and subject to the conditions of a definitive agreement. The final terms of the definitive agreement are in the process of being finalized and management projects the completion of the sale on or about August 31, 2010. The letter of intent is non-binding and either side may terminate with written notice.

Results of Operations

~~Three~~Six ~~Months~~months ~~Ended~~ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 Compared to ~~Three~~Six ~~Months~~months ~~Ended~~ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009

Revenue

Revenues were $47,~~109~~159,~~946~~939 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, a decrease of $~~295~~472,~~228~~699, or 76.2%, from revenues of $47,~~405~~632,~~174~~638 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2009. This decrease was primarily the results of a slow economy and slower ~~than~~ than expected growth of jobs in our Fire Life Safety division.

Fire Life Safety segment revenue for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $14,~~563~~352,000 or 3561% and $35,~~238~~398,000 or 7371% of total revenue, respectively. The decrease in revenue was due to a slow economy and ~~slower~~ slower than expected growth of jobs. Management believes, but cannot guarantee, that this segment’s revenues will increase steadily in the following quarters.

Telecommunication segment revenue for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $1,~~245~~987,000 or 3028% and $~~712~~2,025,000 or 1627% of total revenue, respectively. The ~~increase~~revenue in ~~revenue~~this segment was ~~due~~relatively flat. The Company is reviewing how to ~~organic~~gain ~~revenue~~traction into areas where ~~growth~~this segment has specialized licensing opportunities that some of the competition does not have at its disposable. Management is exploring the means to leverage these opportunities and relationships in these trying times.

~~Specialty construction~~Electrical segment revenue for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $~~657~~821,000 or 1611% and $~~327~~210,000 or 73% of total revenue, respectively. The increase in revenue was due toprimarily organic growth and recognition of revenue from over billings, under billings and the accrual for losses on projects projected at December 31, 2009.

Electrical segment revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $645,000 or 16% and $129,000 or 3% of total revenue, respectively. The increase in revenue was due primarily to organic growth.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists of direct costs on contracts such as direct labor, design, materials, third party subcontractors, and certain other direct overhead costs. Our cost of revenue was $35,~~724~~041,~~156~~027 or 9170% of revenue for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to $24,~~592~~678,~~027~~465 or 5961% for the same ~~period~~ period of the prior year. The dollar increase in our total cost of revenue is due primarily to the corresponding increase in the percentage of cost of sales during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The increase as a percentage of of revenue is due to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations and cost overruns incurred by our Electrical ~~and Specialty segments~~. The multi-segment history of our company is rather limited since this is only the ~~5th quarter~~ 6th quarter with all of our segments up in operation. The historical trend of the last five quarters has ranged from approximately 59% to 91%. The cost of revenue percentage is expected to vary depending on our mix of project revenue and segment revenue. Our management contends that the completion of the “overrun” jobs in the Electrical ~~and Specialty segments~~ will allow us to get our margins back in line with management’s expectations. These areas will continue to be monitored closely going forward, as will all of our segments.

23Fire Life Safety segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $2,446,000 and 56% and $2,952,000 and 55%, respectively. The dollar decrease in our cost of revenue is due to the corresponding decrease in revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2010. This minor change in cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was due to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations and the more competitive bid environment reducing the margins available on work won.

~~Fire Life~~Telecommunication ~~Safety~~ segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $1,~~010~~616,000 and 6581% and $1,~~792~~475,000 and 5573%, respectively. ~~The~~ This ~~dollar~~increase ~~decrease~~ in ~~our~~ cost of revenue as isa percentage of revenue was due to the ~~corresponding~~blend ~~decrease~~of inproject revenue ~~during the three~~attributable ~~months~~to ~~ended~~our ~~March~~existing 31operations, ~~2010. This~~plus ~~increase~~the in cost of ~~revenue~~initial asexpansion ainto additional ~~percentage~~segments of ~~revenue was due to~~ the ~~blend~~telecommunications ofmarket. Management ~~project~~believes, ~~revenue~~but cannot ~~attributable~~guarantee, ~~to our~~that ~~existing~~some ~~operations~~of ~~and~~these ~~the~~costs ~~more~~should ~~competitive~~be ~~bid~~better ~~environment~~leveraged ~~reducing~~as ~~the~~this ~~margins~~area ~~available~~of ontelecommunications ~~work won~~grows.

~~Wireless~~Electrical ~~communication~~ segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $~~987~~979,000 and 79119% and $~~493~~252,000 and 69120%, respectively. The dollar increase in our cost of revenue is due to the corresponding increase in revenue during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. This ~~increase~~segment inhad issues with cost ofoverruns ~~revenue~~on its asfour primary jobs started in the fourth quarter of 2009. These aoverruns ~~percentage~~continued into the first quarter of ~~revenue~~2010. Management believes ~~was~~it ~~due~~has tosignificantly reduced overhead and other costs and is reviewing the ~~blend~~viability of ~~project~~and/or ~~revenue~~direction ~~attributable~~to take with this segment to insure that it ~~our~~can ~~existing~~contribute ~~operations~~to the overall success of our company.

Specialty construction segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $815,000 and 124% and $185,000 and 57%, respectively. As discussed above, the dollar increase in our total cost of revenue is due to the corresponding increase in revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase as a percentage of revenue is due to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations and certain cost overruns. Management of the Specialty segment is actively seeking change orders and reviewing certain costs for overcharges in relation to these costs. Management believes that all costs have been accounted for and anticipates that closer monitoring of the jobs will facilitate eliminating, removing or decreasing overrun potential from future jobs.

Electrical power segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $910,000 and 141% and $122,000 and 95%, respectively. The dollar increase in our cost of revenue is due to the corresponding increase in revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase as a percentage of revenue is due primarily to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations. This segment had issues with cost overruns on its four primary jobs started in the fourth quarter of 2009. These overruns continued into the first quarter of 2010. Management has significantly reduced overhead and other costs and is reviewing the viability of and/or direction to take with this segment to insure that it can contribute to the overall success of our company.

Selling, general and administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $12,~~403~~424,~~193~~932 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 compared to $13,~~571~~227,~~857~~361 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. ~~The~~ The selling, general and administrative cost related to revenues decreased to ~~34%~~ 33.9% for ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to 3642.3% for the ~~three~~ six months ended June ~~March 31~~30, 2009, despite having a smaller revenue base in 2010. ~~Current year costs drop to 32% if compared to 2009 revenue.~~

The decrease is primarily a result of a decrease in legal and accounting expense of approximately $120,000 due to defense of the union and bank lawsuits, for which the union suit has been settled and decrease in accounting fees associated with review and reporting requirements. We had not previously had audits or reviews done for our quarterly results, causing the reviews of 2009 to add costs. The remainder of the decrease was primarily attributable to salaries and benefits of reduced staffing.24

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $173,007 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $79,130 in the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase came primarily from the intangible amortization related to the Conesco purchase, which was initially set up as a sixty month amortization, but was changed to eighteen months after review and analysis by an independent third party. This amortization will finalize in August 2010. Depreciation expense increased due to leasehold improvements put into the property leased in Sacramento for all of the Sacramento operations. There was also amortization of costs incurred for the sale of preferred stock. These costs are being amortized over twelve months.

Interest

Net interest income increased to $147,149 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared expense of $46,060 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This change was primarily due to the recognition of a gain on the fair value of warrants outstanding at June 30, 2010 offset by an in increase in interest expense due to full use of the line of credit for working capital purposes.

Income Tax

Income tax benefit increased to $80,490 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from a benefit of $29,476 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This is approximately a $51,000 higher benefit due mainly to the movement of the section 481a adjustment of $424,814 from deferred status at June 30, 2009 to current at June 30, 2010. This is offset by the current loss incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010, which eliminates any potential deferred tax asset.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2009

Revenue

Revenues were $3,707,399 for the three months ended June 30, 2010; an increase of $109,406, or 3%, from revenues of $3,597,993 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily driven by increases in the fire protection segment, offset by a decrease in the telecommunications segment. Management is optimistic about the results in the fire segment, but the slow economy is still being watched as we try to increase revenues throughout all of our segments.

Fire Life Safety segment revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $2,790,000 or 75% and $2,203,000 or 61% of total revenue, respectively. The increase in revenue was due to jobs starting that had been waiting in backlog. This segment continues to make headway in garnering contracts and has had a recent increase in bid activity in this segment. Management believes, but cannot guarantee, that this segment’s revenues will increase steadily in the following quarters.

Telecommunication segment revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $742,000 or 20% and $1,313,000 or 36% of total revenue, respectively. The decrease in revenue was due primarily to the winding down of the state project this segment has been working on. Management is reviewing how to gain traction into areas where this segment has specialized licensing opportunities that some of the competition does not have at its disposable. Management hopes, but cannot guarantee, that they will be able to increase revenues for this segment through these means.

Electrical segment revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $176,000 or 5% and $82,000 or 2% of total revenue, respectively. The increase in revenue was due primarily organic growth and recognition of revenue from under billings.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists of direct costs on contracts such as direct labor, design, materials, third party subcontractors, and certain other direct overhead costs. Our cost of revenue was $2,132,062 or 57.5% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $2,332,862 or 64.8% for the same period of the prior year. The decrease as a percentage of revenue is due to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations and the fire protection segment becoming a larger piece of the revenue. All segments of our company are being monitored closely to keep margins in line with management’s expectations.

Fire Life Safety segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $1,435,000 and 51% and $1,205,000 and 55%, respectively. The dollar increase in our cost of revenue is due to the corresponding increase in revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was due to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations.

Telecommunications segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $629,000 and 85% and $1,027,000 and 78%, respectively. The dollar decrease in our cost of revenue is due to the corresponding decrease in revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase in cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was due to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations and the cost of initial expansion into additional segments of the telecommunications market.

Electrical power segment cost of revenue and cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $68,000 and 39% and $101,000 and 123%, respectively. The dollar decrease in our cost of revenue is due primarily to cost savings during the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease as a percentage of revenue is due primarily to the blend of project revenue attributable to our existing operations. Management has significantly reduced overhead and other costs and is reviewing the viability of and/or direction to take with this segment to insure that it can contribute to the overall success of our company.

Selling, general and administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1,149,096 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $1,663,455 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The selling, general and administrative cost related to revenues decreased to 31.0% for three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 46.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, despite having a smaller revenue base in 2010.

The decrease is primarily a result of a decrease in administrative payroll, travel related expenses for vehicles, airfare, fuel and hotels. Management has taken a hard look at these costs and continues to make cuts and adjustments to keep these costs in line as we continue to increase revenue and margin levels.

Management continues to monitor costs in these difficult economic times in order to remove unnecessary overhead.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $7697,~~514~~120 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 compared to $3642,~~623~~507 in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. The increase came primarily from the intangible amortization related to ~~the~~discontinued ~~Conesco purchase~~operations, which was initially set up as a sixty month amortization, but was changed to eighteen months after review and analysis by an independent third party. This amortization will finalize in August 2010. The company also had amortization on fees associated with the sale of preferred stock. The costs will be amortized over twelve months.

Interest

Net interest ~~expense~~income increased to $39180,~~190~~886 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 compared toexpense of $2228,~~020~~543 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. This increase was primarily due to ~~the~~recognition ~~full use~~ of ~~the~~a ~~line~~gain ofon ~~credit~~the ~~for~~fair ~~working~~value ~~capital purposes~~of aswarrants ~~well~~outstanding asat ~~new term loans from the bank for Conesco in~~ June ~~2009~~30, 2010.

Income Tax

~~Income~~There was no income tax benefit ~~increased~~or toexpense ~~$80,490~~ for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 ~~from~~ compared to an expense of $60,316 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. This is ~~approximately~~is ~~a $141,000 higher benefit~~ due ~~mainly~~ to the ~~movement~~net ofloss ~~the section~~position ~~481a adjustment~~ of ~~$424,814~~the ~~from~~Company ~~deferred~~and ~~status~~no atsubsequent ~~March~~realization ~~31, 2009 to~~of ~~current~~any atdeferred ~~March~~tax ~~31,~~assets ~~2010. This~~until ispositive ~~offset~~earnings byare ~~the current loss incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2010, which eliminates any potential deferred tax asset~~gained.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity:

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we experienced a net loss offrom continuing operations of $1251,~~052~~389 and a net loss of $488,~~617~~182 from discontinued operations. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we had $~~152~~551,~~210~~615 in cash. Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts, were $32,~~720~~620,~~887~~959 at ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010. In ~~which~~April, at2010, ~~approximately~~the ~~78%~~Company sold 23,000 shares of ~~current~~its ~~assets~~Series isA ~~comparable~~Convertible Redeemable toPreferred ~~the~~stock ~~80%~~with itnet ~~represented~~proceeds atof ~~December 31~~$523, ~~2009~~125.

At March 31, 2010, we had negative working capital of $428,279, compared to working capital of $591,968 at December 31, 2009. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities decreased to (.92):1 at March 31, 2010 compared to 1.14:1 at December 31, 2009. Cash flow used by operations during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $64,736 as compared to cash used by operations of $206,210 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Management anticipates, but can provide no assurances, that that our existing capital resources will be adequate to satisfy its capital requirements for the foreseeable future.26

~~Our~~At June ~~principal~~30, ~~liquidity~~2010, we had working capital of $86,447, compared to working capital of $591,965 at ~~March~~December 31, ~~2010~~2009. ~~included~~The ~~cash~~ratio of ~~$152~~current assets to current liabilities decreased to 1.01:1 at June 30,~~210~~ ~~and~~2010 $3compared to 1.14:1 at December 31,~~720~~ 2009. Cash used by continuing operations during the six months ended June 30,~~887~~ 2010 was $36,387 as compared to cash used by continuing operations of ~~net~~$96,604 ~~accounts~~for ~~receivable.~~the ~~Our~~six ~~management~~months ~~believes~~ended June 30, 2009. Management anticipates, but can provide no assurances, that that our ~~liquidity~~existing ~~position~~capital resources ~~remains~~will ~~sufficient~~be ~~enough~~adequate to ~~support~~ ~~on-going~~satisfy ~~general~~its ~~administrative~~capital ~~expense,~~requirements ~~strategic~~for ~~positioning, and~~ the ~~garnering~~foreseeable ~~of contracts and relationships~~future.

Our principal liquidity at June 30, 2010 included cash of $551,615 and $2,260,959 of net accounts receivable. Our management believes, but can provide no assurances, that that our liquidity position remains sufficient enough to support on-going general administrative expense, strategic positioning, and the garnering of contracts and relationships.

Cash Flow

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we ~~used~~had ~~net~~ cash used of $6436,~~736~~387 infrom our ~~operating~~continuing operating activities, primarily as a result of our net loss from continuing operations of $1251,~~052~~389,~~617,~~ an increase in costs in excess of billings of $9026,~~157~~045, a decrease in deferred tax liabilities of $80,490 and decrease in accrual for loss ~~against~~ against uncompleted contracts of $9087,~~514~~431, primarily offset by increase in billing in excess of cost of $~~201~~199,~~018~~791, depreciation and amortization of $76151,~~514~~689, bad debt allowance and write offs of $8597,~~314~~664 and by increase in accounts payable of $571,768. Add backs for stock based compensation amounted to $~~809~~24,~~096~~200 offset by reduction for gain on fair value change of warrants. By comparison, net cash used in continuing operating activities ~~was~~ was $~~206~~96,~~210~~604 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009.

There was nolimited investing activity from continuing operations during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The activity consisted of upgrading security monitors at the Sacramento offices. The investing activity during 2009 consisted of the purchase of computers and equipment of approximately $1012,~~520~~820. ~~This was offset by cash of $9,043 acquired in the Conesco acquisition.~~

Financing activity from continuing operations for 2010 consisted of payments on long term debt obligations of $5597,~~544~~ 448 offset by line of credit borrowings of $100,000~~. This~~ ~~was~~and the ~~all~~sale inof ~~the normal~~Series ~~course~~A preferred stock with gross proceeds of ~~business~~$575,000 and ~~note~~short term ~~terms~~notes of $42,500. For 2009, financing activity from continuing operations consisted of payments on long term debt obligations of $45124,~~205~~ 759 offset by line of credit borrowings of $~~181~~294,~~227~~500. ~~This increase in 2010 of principal payments was primarily due to the addition of the Conesco note payable.~~

With recent cuts in corporate and selling, general and administrative costs, management anticipates, but can provide no assurances, that our cash flow will be positive for the remainder of 2010.

Capital Resources:

Line of Credit Facility

The line of credit facility is primarily used to fund short-term changes in working capital. The total capacity of the facility at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 was $1,000,000. ~~Our~~ Our management believes that sufficient liquidity exists but may seek approval to to increase the facility or find other funding sources to increase the facility to to $1.5 million in the future. Our management believes an increased line of credit facility would help to provide adequate liquidity and financial flexibility to support our expected growth beginning in the second quarter of 2010 and beyond.

The facility contains customary financial covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios, including an asset coverage ratio and dollars, debt to equity ratio and a tangible net worth requirement. Non-compliance with any of these ratios or a violation of other covenants could result in an event of default and reduce availability under the facility. We are currently not in compliance with our covenants, but have full availability under the facility.

Effective August 10, 2009, our company executed a new credit facility increasing the line to $1,000,000. The interest rate remains at .5% less than the lender’s index rate, currently 4.5% and the maturity date was reset to June 30, 2010. With the renewal of this credit facility the lender reset ~~customary~~ customary financial covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios, ~~including~~ including an asset coverage ratio and dollars, debt to equity ratio and a tangible net worth requirement. The Company and bank executed a 60 day extension while updated terms for the facility are determined.

Should the current financing arrangements prove to be insufficient for our current needs; we are willing to go to the capital markets to raise the necessary capital to meet these needs.

Long Term Notes

Long term notes with original principal balances totaling $900,000, were issued through our bank on February 3, 2007 ($650,000) and December 31, 2008, ($250,000). The notes were are payable over 5 years and will be paid off on or about February 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013. The notes carry interest rates of 7.76% ~~and~~ and 5.5% respectively. These notes are held by the same bank the Company uses ~~for~~ for its banking and where the line of credit is held. The current balances at ~~March~~ 31June 30, 2010 on these two notes are $~~278~~244,~~583~~612 and $~~193~~181,~~519~~829, respectively.

In June 2009, Conesco’s bank termed out its line of credit, into a three year note. The note is for $120,000 and is due in full in July 2012. The note carries interest of 8%. At March 31, 2010, the outstanding balance on this note was $103,152.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Please refer to Note C to the financial statements.

Inflation

In the opinion of management, inflation will not have an impact on our company’s financial condition and results of its operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, and results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

Other Considerations

There are numerous factors that affect the business and the results of its operations. Sources of these factors include general economic and ~~business~~ business conditions, federal and state regulation of business activities, the level of demand for product services, the level and intensity of competition in the media content industry, and the ability to develop new services based on new or or evolving technology and the market'’s acceptance of those new services, our ability to timely and effectively manage periodic product transitions, the services, customer and geographic sales mix of any particular period, and our ability to continue to improve our infrastructure including personnel and systems to keep pace with our anticipated rapid growth.

Additional Information

We file reports and other materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents may be inspected and copied the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

~~Our~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls ~~principal~~and ~~executive~~Procedures. ~~officer~~Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, ~~principal~~including ~~financial~~our ~~officer~~President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as ~~such term is~~ defined ~~under~~in Rule 13a-15(e) ~~promulgated under~~ and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ~~as amended~~ (the “Exchange Act”), ) as of the ~~last day~~end of the ~~fiscal~~ period covered by this report,. ~~March~~Based 31upon that evaluation, our ~~2010. The~~President, ~~term~~Chief Financial Officer and Secretary concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures ~~means~~as ~~our~~of ~~controls~~the ~~and~~end ~~other~~of ~~procedures~~the ~~that~~period covered by this ~~are~~report ~~designed~~were toeffective ~~ensure~~such that the information required to be disclosed by us in ~~the~~ reports ~~that~~filed ~~we file or submit~~ under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms~~. Disclosure~~ ~~controls~~ and ~~procedures~~(ii) accumulated ~~include,~~and ~~without~~communicated ~~limitation,~~to our ~~controls~~management ~~and~~to ~~procedures~~allow ~~designed~~timely todecisions ~~ensure~~regarding ~~that~~disclosure. ~~information~~A ~~required~~controls ~~to be~~system ~~disclosed~~cannot byprovide usabsolute inassurance, ~~the~~however, ~~reports~~ that wethe ~~file~~objectives orof ~~submit under~~ the ~~Exchange~~controls system ~~Act~~are ~~is accumulated~~met, and ~~communicated~~no toevaluation ~~management,~~of ~~including~~controls ~~our~~can ~~principal~~provide ~~executive~~absolute assurance ~~and~~that ~~principal~~all ~~financial~~control ~~officer,~~issues orand ~~persons~~instances ~~performing~~of ~~similar~~fraud, if ~~functions~~any, ~~as appropriate~~within toa ~~allow~~company have ~~timely~~been ~~decisions regarding required disclosure~~detected.

2628

Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer are required to base their assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on a suitable, recognized control framework, such as the framework developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO). The COSO framework, published in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, is known as the COSO Report. Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, have chosen the COSO framework on which to base their assessment. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2010.

Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in our annual reports on Form 10-K for the annual reporting periods through December 31, 2009.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the Quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any legal proceedings, there are no known judgments against the Company, nor are there any known actions or suits filed or threatened against it or its officers and directors, in their capacities as such. We are not aware of any disputes involving the Company and the Company has no known claim, actions or inquiries from any federal, state or other government agency. We are not aware of any claims against the Company or any reputed claims against it at this time, except as follows:

ITEM 1A - Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risk factors together with the other information contained in this Interim Report on Form 10-Q, and in prior reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. If any of the risks factors actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such cases, the trading price of our common stock could decline. We believe there are no changes that constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the prior reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the Securities Act of 1933 and include or reiterate the following risk factors:

Our Common Stock Is Subject To Penny Stock Regulation

Our shares are subject to the provisions of Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "“Exchange Act"”), commonly referred to as the "“penny stock"” rule. Section 15(g) sets forth certain requirements for transactions in penny stocks and Rule 15g-9(d)(1) incorporates the definition of penny stock as that used in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. The Commission generally defines penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Rule 3a51-1 provides that any equity security is considered to be penny stock unless that security is: registered and traded on a national securities exchange meeting specified criteria set by the Commission; authorized for quotation on the NASDAQ Stock Market; issued by a registered investment company; excluded from the definition on the basis of price (at least $5.00 per share) or the registrant'’s net tangible assets; or exempted from the definition by the Commission. Since our shares are deemed to be "“penny stock"”, trading in the shares will be subject to additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors.

FINRA Sales Practice Requirements May Also Limit A Stockholder'’s Ability To Buy And Sell Our Stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer'’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

We May Not Have Access To Sufficient Capital To Pursue Our Business And Therefore Would Be Unable To Achieve Our Planned Future Growth:

We intend to pursue a growth strategy that includes development of the Company business and technology. Currently we have limited capital which may be insufficient to pursue our plans for development and growth. Our ability to implement our growth plans may depend primarily on our ability to obtain additional private or public equity or debt financing. We are currently seeking additional capital. Such financing may not be available at all, or we may be unable to locate and secure additional capital on terms and conditions that are acceptable to us. Our failure to obtain additional capital may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Nevada Law And Our Articles Of Incorporation Protect Our Directors From Certain Types Of Lawsuits, Which Could Make It Difficult For Us To Recover Damages From Them In The Event Of A Lawsuit.

Nevada law provides that our directors will not be liable to our company or to our stockholders for monetary damages for all but certain types of conduct as directors. Our Articles of Incorporation require us to indemnify our directors and officers against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law. The exculpation provisions may have the effect of preventing stockholders from recovering damages against our directors caused by their negligence, poor judgment or other circumstances. The indemnification provisions may require our company to use our assets to defend our directors and officers against claims, including claims arising out of their negligence, poor judgment, or other circumstances.

Because We Are Quoted On The OTCBB Instead Of An Exchange Or National Quotation System, Our Investors May Have A Tougher Time Selling Their Stock Or Experience Negative Volatility On The Market Price Of Our Stock.

Our common stock is traded on the OTCBB. The OTCBB is often highly illiquid. There is a greater chance of volatility for securities that trade on the OTCBB as compared to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including the lack of readily available price quotations, the absence of consistent administrative supervision of bid and ask quotations, lower trading volume, and market conditions. Investors in our common stock may experience high fluctuations in the market price and volume of the trading market for our securities. These fluctuations, when they occur, have a negative effect on the market price for our securities. Accordingly, our stockholders may not be able to realize a fair price from their shares when they determine to sell them or may have to hold them for a substantial period of time until the market for our common stock improves.

Failure To Achieve And Maintain Effective Internal Controls In Accordance With Section 404 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Could Have A Material Adverse Effect On Our Business And Operating Results.

It may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and implement the additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal auditing and other finance staff in order to develop and implement appropriate additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures. If we are unable to comply with these requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may not be able to obtain the independent accountant certifications that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires of publicly traded companies.

If we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal control over financial reporting or to remedy any material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may identify, such failure could result in material misstatements in our financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and current SEC regulations, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal period ended December 31, 2009, we were required to prepare assessments regarding internal controls over financial reporting and beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal period ended December 31, 2009, furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. There also can be no assurance that our auditors will be able to issue an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting beginning with out annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal period ending December 31, 2010. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

In addition, in connection with our on-going assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may discover “material weaknesses” in our internal controls as defined in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The PCAOB defines “significant deficiency” as a deficiency that results in more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.

In the event that a material weakness is identified, we will employ qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures to address any material weaknesses that we identify. However, the process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company. We cannot assure you that the measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial process and reporting in the future.

Any failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of our internal controls and, in the case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

Operating History And Lack Of Profits Which Could Lead To Wide Fluctuations In Our Share Price. The Price At Which You Purchase Our Common Shares May Not Be Indicative Of The Price That Will Prevail In The Trading Market. You May Be Unable To Sell Your Common Shares At Or Above Your Purchase Price, Which May Result In Substantial Losses To You. The Market Price For Our Common Shares Is Particularly Volatile Given Our Status As A Relatively Unknown Company With A Small And Thinly Traded Public Float, Limited

The market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common shares are sporadically and thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our common shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price. Secondly, we are a speculative or “risky” investment due to our limited operating history and lack of profits to date, and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our potential products. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned issuer. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether our common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common shares for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the volatility of our share price.

Volatility In Our Common Share Price May Subject Us To Securities Litigation, Thereby Diverting Our Resources That May Have A Material Effect On Our Profitability And Results Of Operations.

As discussed in the preceding risk factors, the market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.

COMPLIANCE WITH CHANGING REGULATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL EXPENSES AND POSE CHALLENGES FOR OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC regulations, have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S. public markets. Our management team will need to devote significant time and financial resources to comply with both existing and evolving standards for public companies, which will lead to increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue generating activities to compliance activities.

SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED OR PLANNED.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS SECURITIES

~~There~~In April ~~were~~2010, nothe ~~unregistered~~Company ~~sales~~sold 23,000 shares of ~~securities~~Series ~~during~~A ~~the~~10% ~~three~~Redeemable ~~months~~Convertible Preferred ~~ended~~Stock, ~~March~~no 31par value, for $575,000 to two accredited ~~2010~~investors. The investors also received 575,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. The warrants expire five years from date of issuance, April 2015.

The above offering and sale was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and had such background, education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering; (c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all other information requested with respect to our company; (d) the investors acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, and agreed to transfer such securities only in a transaction registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or exempt from registration under the Securities Act; and (e) a legend was placed on the certificates representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act of 1933or transferred in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended March 31, 2010.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

3.1	~~Certificate of Incorporation (1)~~	Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.2	~~Bylaws of Pro-Tech Industries, Inc. (1)~~	Bylaws of Pro-Tech Industries, Inc. (1)
14.1	~~Code of Ethics (2)~~	Code of Ethics (2)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(3)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.(3)
32.2	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.(3)
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.(3)

~~1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s filing on Form SB-2, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2007.~~32

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(3)

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.(3)

32.2		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.(3)

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.(3)

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s filing on Form SB-2, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2007.

(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s filing on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2009.

(3) Filed herein.

3133

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant	Pro-Tech Industries, Inc.
Date: May 24, 2010	By:	/s/ Donald Gordon
Date: August 16, 2010	By:	/s/ Donald Gordon
	~~Donald Gordon~~	Donald Gordon
	~~Chief Executive Officer~~	Chief Executive Officer

Registrant	Pro-Tech Industries, Inc.
Date: May 24, 2010	By:	/s/ Michael Walsh
Date: August 16, 2010	By:	/s/ Michael Walsh
	~~Michael Walsh~~	Michael Walsh
	~~Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)~~	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

3234

Filing Compare · Pro-Tech Industries, Inc.