UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

o¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 0-12991

PC GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		11-2239561
(State or other jurisdiction		(I.R.S. employer
of incorporation or organization)		identification number)

419 Park Avenue South, Suite 500, New York, New York 10016

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 687-3260

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES o ¨ NO o ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer ¨o Accelerated filer ¨o Non-accelerated filer ¨o Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES o ¨ NO x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, Par Value $.02— 7,848,774 shares as of ~~May~~August 49, 2010.

INDEX

PC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets As of March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets As of June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Three month period ended March 31, 2010	5
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Six month period ended June 30, 2010	5
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	6
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	6
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	2224
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2224
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2425
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2425
Item 5.	Other Information	2425
Item 6.	Exhibits	26
Signatures		27
Exhibit Index		28

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

	March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2009
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,~~178~~051,~~557~~629		$	4,599,940
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts and returns and allowances aggregating $89,531 and $314,440, respectively		6,255,956			4,394,180
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts and returns and allowances aggregating $114,749 and $314,440, respectively		6,531,597			4,394,180
Inventories, net		67,~~745~~128,~~827~~328			5,988,209
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,~~031~~063,~~600~~728			1,190,081
Total current assets		17,~~211~~775,~~940~~282			16,172,410
Property and equipment, net		8,~~353~~190,~~064~~691			8,490,229
Identifiable intangible assets, net		7,~~781~~546,~~682~~287			8,017,568
Goodwill		11,175,637			11,175,637
Other assets		~~380~~275,~~119~~476			426,073
Total assets	$	44,~~902~~963,~~442~~373		$	44,281,917
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	3,~~217~~928,~~999~~449		$	2,422,003
Obligation under capital lease—current portion		130,240			81,011
Obligation under capital lease – current portion		180,759			81,011
Other current liabilities		32,~~061~~905,~~760~~558			2,299,920
Total current liabilities		67,~~409~~014,~~999~~766			4,802,934
Long-term debt:
5% Convertible Notes, net of debt discount of $750,000 at March 31, 2010 and $862,500 at December 31, 2009		28,130,000			28,017,500
5% Convertible Notes, net of debt discount of $637,500 at June 30, 2010 and $862,500 at December 31, 2009		28,242,500			28,017,500
Obligation under capital lease		2,~~569~~519,~~760~~241			2,618,989
Deferred income taxes payable		698,010			698,010
Other liabilities		21,~~150~~000			1,210
Total liabilities		3738,~~809~~475,~~919~~517			36,138,643
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 250,000 shares; no shares issued		—			—
Common stock, $.02 par value; authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 11,648,512 shares		232,971			232,971
Additional paid in capital		53,~~738~~790,~~787~~298			53,686,944
Accumulated deficit		(4445,~~428~~062,~~539~~476	)		(43,354,339	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		~~511~~489,~~353~~112			539,747
		10,054,572			11,105,323
		9,449,905			11,105,323
Treasury stock at cost, 3,799,738 shares		(2,962,049	)		(2,962,049	)
Total stockholders’ equity		76,~~092~~487,~~523~~856			8,143,274
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	44,~~902~~963,~~442~~373		$	44,281,917

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

PC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net sales	$	1011,~~457~~726,~~979~~135		$	911,~~064~~734,~~923~~101		$	22,184,114		$	20,799,024
Cost of sales		78,~~416~~364,~~318~~897			68,~~911~~121,~~697~~603			15,781,215			15,033,300
Gross profit		3,~~041~~361,~~661~~238			23,~~153~~612,~~226~~498			6,402,899			5,765,724
General and administrative expenses		1,~~912~~810,~~482~~883			21,~~054~~680,~~241~~535			3,723,365			3,734,776
Selling expenses		1,~~331~~350,~~458~~478			1,~~176~~074,~~318~~882			2,681,936			2,251,200
Research and development expenses		~~245~~209,~~821~~823			~~234~~204,~~905~~267			455,644			439,172
Operating loss		(448,100	)		(1,312,238	)
Operating income (loss)		(9,946	)		652,814			(458,046	)		(659,424	)
Other expense, net:
Interest income		1513,~~162~~994			812,~~704~~713			29,156			21,417
Interest expense		(~~640~~639,~~157~~075	)		(~~645~~643,~~288~~538	)		(1,279,232	)		(1,288,826	)
Other		(1,~~105~~090	)		24(11,~~714~~001	)		(15	)		13,713
Other expense, net		(~~626~~623,~~100~~991	)		(~~611~~641,~~870~~826	)		(1,250,091	)		(1,253,696	)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(1,074,200	)		(1,924,108	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(633,937	)		10,988			(1,708,137	)		(1,913,120	)
Benefit from income taxes		—			~~1,075,200~~—			—			1,075,200
Loss from continuing operations		(1,074,200	)		(848,908	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(633,937	)		10,988			(1,708,137	)		(837,920	)
Discontinued Operations: Loss from operations of discontinued subsidiaries		—			(75,876	)
Discontinued Operations:
Provision for income taxes		—			—
Income from operations of discontinued subsidiaries (including gain on sales of subsidiaries of $77,550 and $1,674 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009)		—			77,550			—			1,674
Loss from discontinued operations		—			(75,876	)
Benefit from income taxes		—			—			—			—
Net Loss	$	(1,074,200	)	$	(924,784	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			77,550			—			1,674
Net Loss per common share:
Net income (loss)	$	(633,937	)	$	88,538		$	(1,708,137	)	$	(836,246	)
Basic and diluted:
Net income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.10	)
Basic and diluted
Loss from discontinued operations		—			(0.01	)
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.08	)	$	—		$	(0.22	)	$	(0.10	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.11	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			0.01			—			—
Weighted average number of common shares used in computation of net (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	(0.08	)	$	0.01		$	(0.22	)	$	(0.10	)
Basic and diluted		7,848,774			8,659,474
Weighted average number of common shares used in computation of net income (loss) per share:
Basic		7,848,774			7,838,260			7,848,774			8,246,598
Diluted		7,848,774			7,898,260			7,848,774			8,246,598

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

PC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

													Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
								Additional					Foreign						Total
	Common Stock				Treasury			Paid-in		Accumulated			Currency			Comprehensive			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Stock			Capital		Deficit			Translation			Income (Loss)			Equity
Balance at January 1, 2010		11,648,512	$	232,971	$	(2,962,049	)	$	53,686,944	$	(43,354,339	)	$	539,747					$	8,143,274
Net loss											(1,~~074~~708,~~200~~137	)				$	(1,~~074~~708,~~200~~137	)
Foreign currency adjustment														(2850,~~394~~635	)		(2850,~~394~~635	)
Total comprehensive loss																$	(1,~~102~~758,~~594~~772	)		(1,~~102~~758,~~594~~772	)
Stock-based compensation expense									51103,~~843~~354											51103,~~843~~354
Balance March 31, 2010		11,648,512	$	232,971	$	(2,962,049	)	$	53,738,787	$	(44,428,539	)	$	511,353					$	(7,092,523	)
Balance at June 30, 2010		11,648,512	$	232,971	$	(2,962,049	)	$	53,790,298	$	(45,062,476	)	$	489,112					$	6,487,856

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

PC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended March 31,
	For the six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(1,~~074~~708,~~200~~137	)	$	(~~924~~836,~~784~~246	)
Loss from discontinued operations		—			75,876
Income from discontinued operations		—			(1,674	)
Loss from continuing operations		(1,~~074~~708,~~200~~137	)		(~~848~~837,~~908~~920	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of identifiable intangible assets		~~588~~1,~~676~~168,175			~~673~~1,~~721~~290,013
Amortization of debt acquisition costs		90180,~~080~~160			90180,~~081~~161
Amortization of debt discount		~~112~~225,~~500~~000			~~112~~225,~~500~~000
Stock-based compensation expense		51103,~~843~~354			50102,~~106~~236
Increase (decrease) in fair value of derivative		940			(25,000	)
Reduction in fair value of derivative liability		(210	)		(14,000	)
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts receivable		(65,771	)		9,011
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts receivable		(199,691	)		36,353
Deferred income tax benefit		—			(1,075,200	)
Deferred income tax (benefit)		—			(1,075,200	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(1,~~878~~987,~~677~~477	)		~~247~~(55,~~655~~488	)
Inventories		(~~772~~1,~~206~~160,120	)		~~196~~1,~~315~~289,953
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(11130,~~602~~214	)		(4128,~~165~~498	)
Other assets		(446,~~125~~501	)		~~739~~586
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		12,~~564~~122,~~919~~418			~~639~~(164,~~062~~625	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations		(1,~~437~~393,~~623~~243	)		28948,~~917~~571
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations		—			―
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(1,~~437~~393,~~623~~243	)		28948,~~917~~571
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(~~215~~397,~~625~~356	)		(~~350~~513,~~846~~277	)
Net proceeds from sale of subsidiary		237,500			116,418
Net proceeds from sales of subsidiaries		237,500			353,918
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities for continuing operations		21,875			(234,428	)
Net cash used in investing activities for continuing operations		(159,856	)		(159,359	)
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations		—			―—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		21,875			(234,428	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(159,856	)		(159,359	)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

PC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended March 31,
	For the six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(92494,~~856~~881	)
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations		—			(92,856	)
Repayment of Note Receivable		19,065			—
Net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations		—			―
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations		19,065			(494,881	)
Net cash used in financing activities		—			(92,856	)
Net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations		—			—
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(5,635	)		(6,184	)
Net cash used in financing activities		19,065			(494,881	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,421,383	)		(304,551	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(14,277	)		875
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,548,311	)		295,206
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		4,599,940			4,003,460
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,~~178~~051,~~557~~629		$	34,~~698~~298,~~909~~666
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	721,~~077~~362,915		$	~~110~~1,~~753~~359,453
Income Taxes	$	250		$	4,600
Income taxes	$	250		$	4,600
Supplemental Disclosures of Non Cash Investing Activities:
Supplemental Disclosures of Non Cash Financing Activities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities relating to property and equipment	$	—		$	~~101~~24,~~295~~280

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

PC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Other Matters

(a) ~~Name~~Basis ~~Change~~of Presentation

OnThe accompanying ~~July~~unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been ~~23,~~prepared ~~2009,~~in ~~the~~accordance ~~Company~~with ~~changed~~generally ~~its~~accepted ~~name~~accounting ~~from~~principles ~~Langer,~~for ~~Inc.~~interim financial information and with the instructions to PCForm 10-Q ~~Group,~~and ~~Inc~~Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. ~~The~~ ~~name~~Accordingly, ~~change~~they ~~was~~do ~~approved~~not atinclude all of the information ~~Company’s~~and ~~2009~~footnotes ~~Annual~~required by accounting principles generally accepted ~~Meeting~~in the United States of ~~Stockholders~~America ~~held~~for oncomplete ~~July~~financial 14statements. In the opinion of management, ~~2009~~all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals), other than the purchases and sales of affiliates discussed herein, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~These ~~also~~unaudited ~~changed~~condensed ~~its~~consolidated ~~stock~~financial ~~ticker~~statements ~~symbol~~should onbe ~~NASDAQ~~read ~~from~~in ~~“GAIT”~~conjunction towith the ~~“PCGR”~~related ~~effective~~financial atstatements and consolidated notes, included in the ~~commencement~~Company’s ofannual ~~trading~~report on ~~July~~Form 10-K 24for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

~~The new~~Operating ~~name~~results isfor ~~intended to more accurately reflect~~ the ~~Company’s~~three ~~current business model~~ and ~~scope~~six ofmonths ~~its~~ended ~~product~~June ~~offerings. The Company has historically designed~~30, ~~manufactured~~2010 ~~and~~are ~~distributed~~not anecessarily indicative ~~broad range~~ of ~~medical products targeting~~ the ~~orthopedic,~~results ~~orthotic,~~that ~~and~~may ~~prosthetic~~be ~~markets. Today, the~~expected ~~Company offers a more diverse line of personal care products~~ for the ~~private label~~year ~~retail~~ending December 31, ~~medical and therapeutic markets and the name PC Group, Inc~~2010. ~~better conveys this broader scope of products.~~

~~(b)~~The Company ~~Basis~~classifies as discontinued operations for all periods presented any component of ~~Presentation~~its business that is probable of being sold or has been sold that has operations and cash flows that are clearly distinguishable operationally and for financial reporting purposes. For those components, the Company has no significant continuing involvement after disposal, and their operations and cash flows are eliminated from ongoing operations. Sales of significant components of the Company’s business not classified as discontinued operations are reported as a component of income from continuing operations.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (~~consisting of normal recurring accruals~~b), ~~other than the purchases and sale of affiliates discussed herein~~Non-Recurring, ~~considered~~ necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the related financial statements and consolidated notes, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10Non-KCash ~~for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.~~Benefit

~~Operating results~~In ~~for~~ the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2009, ~~are~~the ~~not~~Company ~~necessarily~~realized ~~indicative~~a non-recurring, non-cash benefit from income taxes of ~~the~~approximately $1,075,000. This benefit results ~~that~~from ~~may~~the bereversal ~~expected~~of ~~for~~a previously established tax valuation allowance which is no longer required as a result of a change in the ~~year~~estimated ~~ending~~useful ~~December 31,~~life ~~2010~~of the Silipos tradename from an indefinite life to a useful life of 18 years effective January 1, 2009.

~~The Company~~(c) classifies as discontinued operations for all periods presented any component of our business that is probable of being sold or has been sold that has operations and cash flows that are clearly distinguishable operationally and for financial reporting purposes. For those components, the Company has no significant continuing involvement after disposal, and their operations and cash flows are eliminated from ongoing operations. Sales of significant components of our business not classified as discontinued operations are reported as a component of income from continuing operations.Seasonality

~~(c)~~Factors ~~Non-recurring~~which can result in quarterly variations include the timing and amount of new business generated by the Company, ~~non-cash~~the ~~benefit~~timing of new product introductions, revenue mix, and the competitive and fluctuating economic conditions in the medical and skincare industries.

In(d) ~~the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company realized a non~~Stock-~~recurring, non-cash~~Based benefit from income taxes of approximately $1,075,000. This benefit results from the reversal of a previously established tax valuation allowance which is no longer required as a result of a change in the estimated useful life of the Silipos tradename from an indefinite life to a useful life of 18 years effective January 1, 2009.Compensation

~~(d)~~The ~~Seasonality~~total stock compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $51,511 and $103,354, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $52,220 and $102,326, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

~~Factors~~The Company ~~which~~accounts ~~can~~for ~~result~~share-based compensation cost in ~~quarterly~~accordance with FASB ASC ~~variations~~718-10 ~~include~~(prior ~~the~~authoritative ~~timing~~literature: ~~and~~SFAS ~~amount~~No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”). The fair value of ~~new~~each ~~business~~option ~~generated~~award byis estimated on the date of ~~Company,~~the grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The compensation cost is recognized over the ~~timing~~service period which is usually the vesting period of ~~new~~the ~~product~~award. Expected ~~introductions,~~volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Company’s ~~revenue~~stock. The ~~mix,~~risk-free ~~and~~interest rate is based on Treasury issues with a term equal to the ~~competitive~~expected life of the option. The Company uses historical data to estimate expected dividend yield, expected life and ~~fluctuating~~forfeiture ~~economic~~rates. For ~~conditions~~stock options granted as consideration for services rendered by non-employees, the Company recognizes compensation expense in accordance with the ~~medical~~requirements of EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods and ~~skincare~~Services” and FASB ASC 505-50 (prior ~~industries~~authoritative literature: EITF No. 00-18 “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees,”).

(e) ~~Stock-Based~~Fair ~~Compensation~~Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820-10 (prior authoritative literature: SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”), was adopted January 1, 2008 and provides guidance related to estimating fair value and requires expanded disclosures. The ~~total~~standard applies ~~stock~~whenever ~~compensation~~other ~~expense~~standards ~~for~~require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the ~~three~~use ~~months~~of ~~ended~~fair ~~March~~value 31in any new circumstances. In February 2008, ~~2010~~the FASB provided a one-year deferral for the implementation of FASB ASC 820-10 for non-financial assets and liabilities ~~2009~~recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on ~~was~~a ~~$51,843~~non-recurring basis. The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 for non-financial assets and ~~$50~~liabilities as of January 1,~~106,~~ ~~respectively~~2009 which did not have a material impact on the results of operations. On a nonrecurring basis, ~~and~~the isCompany ~~included~~uses fair value measures when analyzing asset impairment. Long-lived tangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in ~~general~~circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be ~~administrative~~fully ~~expenses~~recoverable, inbased on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the ~~consolidated~~remaining amortization ~~statements~~periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value. During the fourth quarter of each year, the Company evaluates goodwill and ~~operations~~indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment at the reporting unit level.

The Company accounts for share-based compensation cost in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10 (prior authoritative literature: SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The compensation cost is recognized over the service period which is usually the vesting period of the award. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Company’s stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option. The Company uses historical data to estimate expected dividend yield, expected life and forfeiture rates. For stock options granted as consideration for services rendered by non-employees, the Company recognizes compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC 505-50 (prior authoritative literature: EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods and Services” and EITF 00-18 “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees”).

(f) Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820-10 (prior authoritative literature: SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”), was adopted January 1, 2008, and provides guidance related to estimating fair value and requires expanded disclosures. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. In February 2008, the FASB provided a one year deferral for the implementation of FASB ASC 820-10 for non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 for non-financial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2009, which did not have a material impact on the results of operations. On a nonrecurring basis, the Company uses fair value measures when analyzing asset impairment. Long-lived tangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value. During the fourth quarter of each year, the Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment at the reporting unit level.

The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

Level one— Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level two— Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

Level three— Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

The following table identifies the financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value by level at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

	March 31, 2010						December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010 Fair Value Measurements Using						December 31, 2009 Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value Measurements Using						Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Money Markets	$	2,~~718~~923,~~470~~242	$	—	$	—	$	4,314,514	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative	$	—	$	—	$	21,~~150~~000	$	—	$	—	$	1,210

A level 3 unobservable input is used when little or no market data is available. The derivative liability is valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using various assumptions. These assumptions are more fully discussed below.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities valued using significant unobservable inputs (level 3):

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2010		Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Derivative liability:
Beginning balance	$	1,210	$	30,000
Total (gains) losses included in earnings		940		(25,000	)
Ending balance	$	2,150	$	5,000

Total gains and losses included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are reported as other income in the consolidated statements of operations.

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)					Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009		June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009
Derivative liability:
Beginning balance	$	2,150		$	5,000	$	1,210		$	30,000
Total (gains) losses included in earnings		(1,150	)		11,000		(210	)		(14,000	)
Ending balance	$	1,000		$	16,000	$	1,000		$	16,000

~~Although~~Total ~~there~~gains ~~were~~and nolosses ~~fair~~included ~~value~~in ~~adjustments~~earnings tofor ~~non-financial assets,~~ the ~~following table~~three ~~identifies~~and ~~the~~six ~~non-financial~~months ~~assets~~ended ~~that~~June 30, 2010 are ~~measured~~reported atas ~~fair~~other ~~value~~income ~~by level~~in atthe ~~March~~consolidated ~~31,~~statements ~~2010:~~of operations.

	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Gains (Losses)
Identifiable Intangible Assets	$	—	$	—	$	7,781,682	$	—
Goodwill		—		—		11,175,637		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	18,957,319	$	—

Although there were no fair value adjustments to non-financial assets, the following table identifies the non-financial assets that are measured at fair value by level at June 30, 2010:

	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Gains (Losses)
Identifiable Intangible Assets	$	—	$	—	$	7,546,287	$	—
Goodwill		—		—		11,175,637		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	18,721,924	$	—

As prescribed under adopted FASB ASC 360-10 (prior authoritative literature: FAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,”) the Company tests annually for possible impairment to goodwill. The Company performs its test as of October 1st each year using a discounted cash flow analysis that requires that certain assumptions and estimates be made regarding industry economic factors and future growth and profitability at each of our reporting units. The Company also incorporates market participant assumptions to estimate fair value for impairment testing. The Company’s definite lived intangible assets are tested under FASB ASC 350-30 (prior authoritative literature: FAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”) when impairment indicators are present. An undiscounted model is used to determine if the carrying value of the asset is recoverable. If not, a discounted analysis is done to determine the fair value. The Company engages a valuation analysis expert to prepare the models and calculations used to perform the tests, and the Company provides them with estimates regarding our reporting units’ expected growth and performance for future years.

At ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010, the carrying amount of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximated fair value because of their short-term maturity. The carrying value of long-term debt, net of discount, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $28,~~130~~242,~~000~~500 and $28,017,500, respectively. The approximated fair value of long-term debt based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms was $27,~~942~~765,~~691~~142 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow model.

(f)	Discount on Convertible Debt

In June 2008, the FASB published FASB ASC 815-40 (prior authoritative literature: EITF No. 07-5 “Determining Whether an Instrument is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock”) to address concerns regarding the meaning of “indexed to an entity’s own stock” contained in FASB ASC 815-10 (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”) FASB ASC 815-40 addresses the issue of the determination of whether a free-standing equity-linked instrument should be classified as equity or debt. If an instrument is classified as debt, it is valued at fair value, and this value is remeasured on an ongoing basis, with changes recorded in earnings in each reporting period. FASB ASC 815-40 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2008 and earlier adoption was not permitted. Although FASB ASC 815-40 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, any outstanding instrument at the date of adoption required a retrospective application of the accounting principle through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption. The Company has completed an analysis as it pertains to the conversion option in its convertible debt, which was triggered by the reset provision, and has determined that the fair value of the derivative liability was $30,000 and the debt discount was $1,312,500 at January 1, 2009. The Company estimates the fair value of the derivative liability using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:

(g) Discount on Convertible Debt

	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Annual dividend yield		—			—
Expected life (years)		1.19			1.94
Risk-free interest rate		1.00	%		1.70	%
Expected volatility		80	%		80	%

InExpected ~~June 2008,~~volatility ~~the~~is ~~FASB~~based ~~published~~upon ~~FASB~~the Company’s ~~ASC~~review ~~815-40~~of ~~(prior~~historical ~~authoritative~~volatility. The ~~literature:~~Company ~~EITF~~believes this ~~Issue~~method ~~07-5~~produces ~~“Determining Whether~~ an ~~Instrument~~estimate that is ~~Indexed~~representative toof anthe ~~Entity~~Company’s ~~Own~~expectations ~~Stock”)~~of tofuture ~~address~~volatility ~~concerns~~over ~~regarding~~ the ~~meaning~~expected term of ~~“indexed~~the toderivative anliability. The ~~entity’s~~Company ~~own stock”~~currently ~~contained~~has inno ~~FASB~~reason ~~ASC~~to ~~815-10~~believe ~~(prior~~future ~~authoritative~~volatility over the ~~literature: “Accounting~~expected ~~for~~remaining ~~Derivative~~life ~~Instruments~~of ~~and~~this ~~Hedging~~conversion option is likely to differ materially ~~Activities”). FASB~~from ~~ASC~~historical ~~815-40~~volatility. The ~~addresses~~expected ~~the~~life ~~issue~~is ofbased on the remaining ~~determination~~term of ~~whether~~the aconversion ~~free-standing~~option. The ~~equity~~risk-~~linked~~free ~~instrument~~interest ~~should~~rate ~~be classified~~is asbased ~~equity~~on three-year ~~or debt~~U. IfS. anTreasury ~~instrument~~securities. The isCompany ~~classified~~recorded asan ~~debt,~~adjustment to itretained isearnings ~~valued~~in atthe ~~fair~~amount ~~value~~of $1,459,109, ~~and~~which ~~this~~represents ~~value~~the iscumulative change ~~remeasured~~in onthe anfair ~~ongoing~~value ~~basis~~of the conversion option, ~~with~~ ~~changes~~net ~~recorded~~of inthe ~~earnings~~impact inof amortization ~~each~~of ~~reporting~~the ~~period. FASB~~additional ~~ASC 815-40~~debt isdiscount ~~effective~~from ~~for~~date ~~years~~of ~~beginning~~issuance ~~after~~of the notes (December 158, ~~2008.~~2006) ~~Earlier~~ through adoption ~~was~~of ~~not~~this ~~permitted~~pronouncement. ~~Although~~ In addition, as required by FASB ASC 815-40, isthe ~~effective~~Company ~~for fiscal~~recorded ~~years~~an ~~beginning~~adjustment ~~after~~to ~~December~~reduce additional ~~15,~~paid ~~2008,~~in ~~any~~capital ~~outstanding~~in ~~instrument at~~ the ~~date~~amount of ~~adoption~~$467,873, ~~requires~~which arepresents ~~retrospective~~the reversal ~~application~~ of the ~~accounting principle~~value ~~through~~of athe ~~cumulative~~debt ~~effect~~discount ~~adjustment~~that towas ~~retained~~recorded ~~earnings~~in ~~upon adoption. The~~paid ~~Company~~in ~~completed~~capital in anconnection ~~analysis~~with asa itreset ~~pertains~~of to the bond conversion ~~option~~price in ~~its~~January ~~convertible~~2007. The debt, ~~which~~discount ~~was~~will ~~triggered~~be byamortized over the ~~reset~~remaining life of the debt ~~provision,~~resulting ~~and~~in ~~determined~~greater ~~that~~interest ~~the~~expense. Interest ~~fair~~expense ~~value~~related ofto the discount ~~derivative~~amounted ~~liability~~to ~~was~~ $30112,~~000~~500 ~~and~~for ~~the~~each ~~debt~~of ~~discount~~the ~~was~~three ~~$1,312,500~~months atended ~~January~~June 130, ~~2009. The~~2010 ~~Company~~and ~~estimates~~2009, ~~the~~and ~~fair~~$225,000 ~~value~~for each of the ~~derivative~~six ~~liability~~months ~~using~~ended ~~the Black-Scholes~~June ~~option~~30, ~~pricing~~2010 ~~model using the following assumptions:~~and 2009.

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
Annual dividend yield		—			—
Expected life (years)		1.69			1.94
Risk-free interest rate		1.60	%		1.70	%
Expected volatility		80	%		80	%

Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility. The Company believes this method produces an estimate that is representative of the Company’s expectations of future volatility over the expected term of the derivative liability. The Company currently has no reason to believe future volatility over the expected remaining life of this conversion option is likely to differ materially from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining term of the conversion option. The risk-free interest rate is based on three-year U.S. Treasury securities. The Company recorded an adjustment to retained earnings in the amount of $1,459,109, which represents the cumulative change in the fair value of the conversion option, net of the impact of amortization of the additional debt discount from date of issuance of the notes (December 8, 2006) through adoption of this pronouncement. In addition, as required by FASB ASC 815-40, the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce additional paid in capital in the amount of $476,873, which represents the reversal of the value of the debt discount that was recorded in paid in capital in connection with a reset of the bond conversion price in January 2007. The debt discount is being amortized over the remaining life of the debt resulting in greater interest expense. Interest related to the discount amounted to $112,500 in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(2) Discontinued Operations

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of Langer UK on January 18, 2008, Regal on June 11, 2008, Bi-Op on July 31, 2008 and substantially all of the operating assets and liabilities related to the Langer branded custom orthotics and related products business on October 24, 2008. For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, the operating results of these wholly owned subsidiaries and businesses, which were formerly included in the medical products and Regal segments, represent an adjustment to ~~increase~~ ~~the~~decrease the loss on the sale of Regal in the amount of $2,550 and an adjustment to decrease the loss on the Langer branded custom orthotics and related products business of $75,~~876~~000. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the operating results of these wholly owned subsidiaries and businesses represent adjustments to increase the loss on the sale of Regal of $73,326 and an adjustment to decrease the loss on the sale of the Langer branded custom orthotics and related products business of $75,000.

(3) Identifiable Intangible Assets

Identifiable intangible assets at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 consisted of:

Assets	Estimated Useful Life (Years)		Adjusted Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Trade names – Silipos		18	$	2,688,000	$	~~186~~224,~~667~~000	$	2,~~501~~464,~~333~~000
Repeat customer base – Silipos		7		1,680,000		1,~~500~~568,~~484~~782		~~179~~111,~~516~~218
License agreements and related technology – Silipos		9.5		1,364,000		~~789~~825,~~684~~579		~~574~~538,~~316~~421
Repeat customer base – Twincraft		19		3,814,500		1,~~555~~620,~~278~~566		2,~~259~~193,~~222~~934
Trade names – Twincraft		23		2,629,300		~~362~~390,~~005~~586		2,~~267~~238,~~295~~714
			$	12,175,800	$	4,~~394~~629,~~118~~513	$	7,~~781~~546,~~682~~287

Identifiable intangible assets at December 31, 2009 consisted of:

Assets	Estimated Useful Life (Years)		Adjusted Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Trade names—Silipos		18	$	2,688,000	$	149,334	$	2,538,666
Repeat customer base—Silipos		7		1,680,000		1,432,186		247,814
License agreements and related technology—Silipos		9.5		1,364,000		753,790		610,210
Repeat customer base—Twincraft		19		3,814,500		1,489,496		2,325,004
Trade names—Twincraft		23		2,629,300		333,426		2,295,874
			$	12,175,800	$	4,158,232	$	8,017,568

Identifiable intangible assets at December 31, 2009 consisted of:

As of December 31, 2009, it was determined that the carrying value of the Twincraft customer base was not recoverable and, accordingly, was written down to its fair value resulting in an impairment of $1,000,000. Also, effective January 1, 2009, the Company changed the estimated useful life of the Silipos tradename from an indefinite life to a useful life of 18 years.

Assets	Estimated Useful Life (Years)		Adjusted Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Trade names – Silipos		18	$	2,688,000	$	149,334	$	2,538,666
Repeat customer base – Silipos		7		1,680,000		1,432,186		247,814
License agreements and related technology – Silipos		9.5		1,364,000		753,790		610,210
Repeat customer base – Twincraft		19		3,814,500		1,489,496		2,325,004
Trade names – Twincraft		23		2,629,300		333,426		2,295,874
			$	12,175,800	$	4,158,232	$	8,017,568

~~Aggregate~~As of ~~amortization~~December ~~expense~~31, ~~relating~~2009, to the ~~above~~Company ~~identifiable~~determined ~~intangible~~that ~~assets~~the ~~for~~ carrying value of the Twincraft ~~three~~customer ~~months~~base ~~ended~~was ~~March~~not 31recoverable and, ~~2010~~accordingly, ~~and~~such ~~2009~~value was written ~~$235,886~~down ~~and~~to its fair value resulting in an impairment of $~~265~~1,~~158~~000, ~~respectively~~000. As Also, ofeffective ~~March~~January 311, ~~2010~~2009, the ~~estimated~~Company ~~future~~changed ~~amortization expense~~the isestimated ~~$680,805~~useful ~~for~~life of the ~~remainder~~Silipos oftradename ~~2010,~~from ~~$657,256~~an ~~for~~indefinite ~~2011,~~life ~~$748,775~~to ~~for 2012,~~a ~~$699,396~~useful ~~for~~life ~~2013,~~of ~~$535,961 for 2014 and $4,459,489~~18 ~~thereafter~~years.

Aggregate amortization expense relating to the above identifiable intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $235,394 and $265,591, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $471,281 and $530,749, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the estimated future amortization expense is $445,411 for the last six months of 2010, $657,256 for 2011, $748,775 for 2012, $699,396 for 2013, $535,961 for 2014 and $4,459,488 thereafter.

(4) Inventories, net

Inventories, net, consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Raw materials	$	4,~~208~~808,~~543~~201		$	3,752,980
Work-in-process		~~431~~329,~~889~~465			277,372
Finished goods		2,~~740~~570,~~908~~836			2,572,236
		7,381,340			6,602,588
		7,708,502			6,602,588
Less: Allowance for excess and obsolescence		(~~635~~580,~~513~~174	)		(614,379	)
	$	67,~~745~~128,~~827~~328		$	5,988,209

(5) Credit Facility

On May 11, 2007, the Company entered into a secured revolving credit facility agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Wachovia”), expiring on September 30, 2011. During 2008, the Company entered two amendments that decreased the maximum amount that the Company may borrow. The Credit Facility, as amended, provides an aggregate maximum availability, if and when the Company has the requisite levels of assets, in the amount of $12 million, and is subject to a sub-limit of $5 million for the issuance of letter of credit obligations, another sub-limit of $3 million for term loans, and a sub-limit of $4 million on loans against inventory. ~~Loans~~ The ~~under the~~ Credit Facility bears ~~will bear~~ interest at 0.5 percent above the lender’s prime rate or, at the Company’s election, at 2.5 percentage points above an Adjusted Eurodollar Rate, as defined in the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is collateralized by a first ~~priority~~ priority security interest in inventory, accounts receivables and all other assets and is guaranteed on a full and unconditional basis by the Company and each of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries (Silipos and Twincraft) and any other company or person that hereafter becomes a borrower or owner of any property in which the lender has a security interest under the Credit Facility. As of ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010, the Company had no outstanding advances under the Credit Facility and has approximately $6.5 million available under the Credit Facility related to eligible accounts receivable and inventory. In addition, the Company has approximately $1.8 million of availability related to property and equipment for term loans.

If the Company’s availability under the Credit Facility drops below $3 million or borrowings under the ~~facility~~Credit Facility exceed $10 million, the Company is required ~~under~~ under the Credit Facility to deposit all cash received from customers into a ~~blocked~~ blocked bank account that will be swept daily to directly pay down any amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. In such event, the Company ~~would~~ would not have any control over the blocked bank account.

The Company’s borrowing availabilities under the Credit Facility are limited to 85% of eligible accounts receivable and 60% of eligible inventory, and are subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Term loans shall be secured by equipment or real estate hereafter acquired. The Company is required to submit monthly unaudited financial statements to Wachovia.

If the Company’s availability is less than $3 ~~million~~,000,000, the Credit Facility requires compliance with various covenants, including, but not limited to, a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. Availability under the ~~Credit~~ Credit Facility is reduced by 40% of the outstanding letters of credit related to the purchase of eligible inventory, as defined, and 100% of all other ~~outstanding~~ outstanding letters of credit. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit related to the purchase of eligible inventory of approximately $~~332~~457,000 .

To ~~the~~ the extent that amounts under the Credit Facility remain unused, while the ~~Credit~~ Credit Facility is in effect and for so long thereafter as any of the obligations under the Credit Facility are outstanding, the Company will pay a monthly commitment fee of three-eighths ~~eights~~ of one percent (0.375%) on the unused portion of the loan commitment. The Company paid Wachovia a closing fee in the amount of $75,000 in August 2007. In addition, the Company paid legal and other costs associated with obtaining the Credit Facility of $319,556 in 2007. In April 2008, the Company paid a $20,000 fee to Wachovia related to an amendment of the Credit Facility, which has been recorded as a deferred financing cost and is being amortized over the remaining term of the Credit Facility. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company had unamortized deferred financing costs in connection with the Credit Facility of $~~191~~119,~~147~~467. Amortization expense for each of the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 was $23,893, and for each of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $47,787.

(6) Segment Information

AsAt ofJune ~~March 31~~30, 2010, the Company operated in two segments (medical products and personal care). ~~Our~~ The Company’s medical products segment, ~~includes~~which used to include Langer UK, Bi-Op and the ~~Silipos~~Langer branded custom orthotics and related ~~medical~~products business., ~~Our~~includes the orthopedic and prosthetic products of Silipos. The personal care segment includes ~~Twincraft~~the operations of Twincraft and the personal care products of Silipos. Regal operated in its own ~~skincare~~segment ~~business~~until its sale in 2008. Assets and expenses related to the Company’s corporate offices are reported under “other” as they do not relate to any of the operating segments. Intersegment sales are recorded at cost.

Segment information for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as follows:

Three months ended March 31, 2010	Medical Products		Personal Care		Other			Total
Three months ended June 30, 2010	Medical Products		Personal Care		Other			Total
Net sales	$	2,~~570~~032,~~060~~329	$	79,~~887~~693,~~919~~806	$	—		$	1011,~~457~~726,~~979~~135
Gross profit		1896,~~350,636~~678		12,~~691~~464,~~025~~560		—			3,~~041~~361,~~661~~238
Operating (loss) income		205,351		81,607		(735,058	)		(448,100	)
Operating income (loss)		171,167		611,153		(792,266	)		(9,946	)
Total assets as of March 31, 2010		17,697,732		22,912,376		4,292,334			44,902,442
Total assets as of June 30, 2010		15,891,150		24,825,028		4,247,195			44,963,373

Three months ended March 31, 2009	Medical Products			Personal Care			Other			Total
Three months ended June 30, 2009	Medical Products			Personal Care			Other			Total
Net sales	$	2,~~096~~168,~~443~~479		$	69,~~968~~565,~~480~~622		$	—		$	911,~~064~~734,~~923~~101
Gross profit		~~935~~1,~~300~~175,529			12,~~217~~436,~~926~~969			—			23,~~153~~612,~~226~~498
Operating loss		(76,926	)		(348,275	)		(887,037	)		(1,312,238	)
Operating income (loss)		233,699			1,018,296			(599,181	)		652,814
Total assets as of March 31, 2009		17,786,424			29,070,955			6,035,853			52,893,232
Total assets as of June 30, 2009		17,251,516			28,616,297			6,044,632			51,912,445

Geographical segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as follows:

Three months ended March 31, 2010,	United States			Canada		Europe			Other			Consolidated Total
Six months ended June 30, 2010	Medical Products			Personal Care		Other			Total
Net sales to external customers	$	7,875,163		$	818,412	$	856,692		$	907,712		$	10,457,979
Net sales	$	4,602,389		$	17,581,725	$	—		$	22,184,114
Gross profit		12,~~952~~204,~~035~~860			~~171~~4,~~988~~198,039		~~440,853~~—			~~476~~6,~~785~~402,899			~~3,041,661~~
Operating (loss) income		(688,000	)		19,247		105,709			114,944			(448,100	)
Operating income (loss)		378,331			597,078		(1,433,455	)		(458,046	)
Total assets as of March 31, 2010		44,632,649			—		269,793			—			44,902,442
Total assets as of June 30, 2010		15,891,150			24,825,028		4,247,195			44,963,373

Three months ended March 31, 2009,	United States			Canada			Europe			Other			Consolidated Total
Six months ended June 30, 2009	Medical Products			Personal Care			Other			Total
Net sales to external customers	$	7,506,762		$	171,342		$	1,036,425		$	350,394		$	9,064,923
Net sales	$	4,265,300		$	16,533,724		$	—		$	20,799,024
Gross profit		12,~~572~~117,~~010~~316			303,~~521~~648,408			~~394,499~~—			~~156~~5,~~196~~765,724			~~2,153,226~~
Operating (loss) income		(1,324,502	)		(4,943	)		9,646			7,561			(1,312,238	)
Operating income (loss)		270,255			556,538			(1,486,217	)		(659,424	)
Total assets as of March 31, 2009		52,568,810			—			324,422			—			52,893,232
Total assets as of June 30, 2009		17,251,516			28,616,297			6,044,632			51,912,445

Geographical segment information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as follows:

Three months ended June 30, 2010	United States			Canada		Europe		Other		Consolidated Total
Net sales to external customers	$	9,381,198		$	450,432	$	615,279	$	1,279,226	$	11,726,135
Gross profit		2,427,256			116,351		246,964		570,667		3,361,238
Operating income (loss)		(278,826	)		39,190		72,357		157,333		(9,946	)
Total assets as of June 30, 2010		44,642,553			—		320,820		—		44,963,373

Three months ended June 30, 2009	United States		Canada		Europe		Other		Consolidated Total
Net sales to external customers	$	9,092,956	$	1,740,262	$	254,819	$	646,064	$	11,734,101
Gross profit		2,769,807		396,586		177,908		268,197		3,612,498
Operating income (loss)		327,467		104,575		127,068		93,704		652,814
Total assets as of June 30, 2009		51,538,203		—		374,242		—		51,912,445

Six months ended June 30, 2010	United States			Canada		Europe		Other		Consolidated Total
Net sales to external customers	$	17,256,361		$	1,268,844	$	1,471,971	$	2,186,938	$	22,184,114
Gross profit		4,379,292			288,339		687,817		1,047,452		6,402,899
Operating income (loss)		(966,826	)		58,437		178,066		272,276		(458,046	)
Total assets as of June 30, 2010		44,642,553			—		320,820		—		44,963,373

Six months ended June 30, 2009	United States			Canada		Europe		Other		Consolidated Total
Net sales to external customers	$	16,599,718		$	1,911,604	$	1,291,244	$	996,458	$	20,799,024
Gross profit		4,341,817			427,107		572,407		424,393		5,765,724
Operating income (loss)		(997,035	)		99,632		136,714		101,265		(659,424	)
Total assets as of June 30, 2009		51,538,203			—		374,242		—		51,912,445

(7) Comprehensive Loss

The Company’s comprehensive ~~losses were~~income (loss) was as follows:

	Three months ended March 31,
	Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009
Net loss	$	(1,~~074~~708,~~200~~137	)	$	(~~924~~836,~~784~~246	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in equity resulting from translation of financial statements into U.S. dollars		(2850,~~394~~635	)		~~(23~~10,~~513~~497	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(1,~~102~~758,~~594~~772	)	$	(~~948~~825,~~297~~749	)

(8) Loss per share

Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares, after giving effect to dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. The diluted loss per share computations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 exclude approximately 1,728,000 shares each, related to employee stock options because the effect of including them would be anti-dilutive. The impact of the 5% Convertible Notes (as hereinafter defined) on the calculation of the fully-diluted EPS was anti-dilutive and is therefore not included in the computation for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, each.

The following table provides the basic and diluted loss EPS:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2010								2009
	Loss			Shares		Per Share			Loss			Shares		Per Share
Basic and diluted EPS	$	(1,074,200	)		7,848,774	$	(0.14	)	$	(924,784	)		8,659,474	$	(0.11	)

(9) Related Party Transactions

5% Convertible Subordinated Notes. On December 8, 2006, the Company sold $28,880,000 of the Company’s 5% Convertible Notes due December 7, 2011 (the “5% Convertible Notes”) in a private placement. The number of shares of common stock issuable on conversion of the 5% Convertible Notes, as of March 31, 2010, was 6,195,165, and the conversion price as of such date was $4.6617. The number of shares and conversion price are subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, and largest beneficial shareholder, Warren B. Kanders, purchased $3,250,000, President and CEO, W. Gray Hudkins, and CFO and COO, Kathleen P. Bloch, each purchased $250,000 of the Company’s 5% Convertible Notes from certain previous debt holders. Mr. Kanders and trusts controlled by Mr. Kanders (as trustee for members of his family) own $5,250,000 of the 5% Convertible Notes, and one director, Stuart P. Greenspon, owns $150,000 of the 5% Convertible Notes. On September 29, 2008, an affiliate of Mr. Kanders entered into letter agreements with Mr. Hudkins and Ms. Bloch pursuant to which they agreed (i) not to sell, transfer, pledge, or otherwise dispose of or convert into common stock, any portion of the 5% Convertible Notes respectively owned by them, and (ii) to cast all votes which they respectively may cast with respect to any shares of common stock underlying the 5% Convertible Notes in the same manner and proportion as shares of common stock voted by Mr. Kanders and his affiliates.

(8) Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per common share are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares, after giving effect to dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. The diluted loss per share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 exclude approximately 1,728,000 shares each, related to employee stock options because the effect of including them would be anti-dilutive. The impact of the 5% Convertible Notes on the calculation of the fully-diluted earnings per share was anti-dilutive and is therefore not included in the computation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The following table provides a reconciliation between basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share:

	Six months ended June 30,
	2010								2009
	Loss			Shares		Per Share			Loss			Shares		Per Share
Basic and diluted EPS	$	(1,708,137	)		7,848,774	$	(0.22	)	$	(836,246	)		8,246,598	$	(0.10	)

	Three months ended June 30,
	2010								2009
	Loss			Shares		Per Share			Income		Shares		Per Share
Basic	$	(633,937	)		7,848,774	$	(0.01	)	$	88,538		7,838,260	$	(0.26	)
Diluted	$	(633,937	)		7,848,774	$	(0.01	)	$	88,538		7,898,260	$	(0.26	)

(9) Related Party Transactions

5% Convertible Subordinated Notes. On December 8, 2006, the Company sold $28,880,000 of the Company’s 5% Convertible Notes due December 7, 2011 in a private placement. The number of shares of common stock issuable on conversion of the notes, as of June 30, 2010, is 6,195,165, and the conversion price as of such date was $4.6617. The number of shares and conversion price are subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and largest beneficial stockholder, Warren B. Kanders, purchased $3,250,000, President and CEO, W. Gray Hudkins, and CFO and COO, Kathleen P. Bloch, each purchased $250,000 of the Company’s 5% Convertible Notes from certain previous debt holders. Mr. Kanders and trusts controlled by Mr. Kanders (as a trustee for members of his family) own $5,250,000 of the 5% Convertible Notes, and one director, Stuart P. Greenspon, owns $150,000 of the 5% Convertible Notes. On September 29, 2008, an affiliate of Mr. Kanders entered into letter agreements with Mr. Hudkins and Ms. Bloch pursuant to which they agreed (i) not to sell, transfer, pledge, or otherwise dispose of or convert into Common Stock, any portion of the 5% Convertible Notes respectively owned by them, and (ii) to cast all votes which they respectively may cast with respect to any shares of Common Stock underlying the 5% Convertible Notes in the same manner and proportion as shares of Common Stock voted by Mr. Kanders and his affiliates.

Lease Agreement – Essex, Vermont. On August 4, 2010, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Twincraft, Inc. (“Twincraft”), entered into a third amendment (the “Amendment”) to its existing sublease agreement dated October 1, 2003 (as amended, the “Essex Lease”) with Asch Enterprises, LLC (“Asch Enterprises”), a Vermont limited liability company, the principal of which is Peter A. Asch, a director of the Company and President of Twincraft. Pursuant to the Essex Lease, Twincraft leases approximately 76,000 squre feet in Essex, Vermont, for use as a warehouse facility. The term of the Essex Lease was scheduled to expire on October 1, 2010. The Amendment extends the term of the Essex Lease for a period commencing on October 1, 2010 and expiring on September 30, 2015 (the “Extended Term”). Pursuant to the Amendment, Twincraft has the right to terminate the Essex Lease during the Extended Term upon two months’ prior written notice to Asch Enterprises, effective at any time following the first year of the Extended Term. In the event of such a termination, in addition to any rent owing to Asch Enterprises, Twincraft will pay Asch Enterprises a termination fee of $104,362.50 prior to the effective date of such termination.

(10) Litigation

~~The Company~~In ~~received a letter from Langer Biomechanics, Inc. f/k/a Langer Acquisition Corp. (“Langer Biomechanics”) dated September 17, 2009, alleging~~ the ~~breach~~normal bycourse ~~the Company~~ of ~~certain representations and warranties contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 24~~business, ~~2008 between~~ the Company ~~and~~may ~~Langer Biomechanics~~be ~~(the~~subject ~~“Asset Purchase Agreement”), related~~ to ~~the~~claims ~~sale of the assets~~ and ~~liabilities of the Company’s former Langer branded custom orthotics and~~litigation ~~related~~in ~~products business. No damages were alleged by Langer Biomechanics at~~ the ~~time. As~~areas ~~a result~~ of ~~Langer~~general ~~Biomechanics’ allegation~~liability, aincluding ~~receivable~~claims ~~in the amount~~ of ~~$237~~employees,~~500~~ ~~that~~and ~~was scheduled to be~~claims, ~~released~~litigation toor ~~the~~other ~~Company~~liabilities ~~from~~as ~~escrow~~a onresult ~~October~~of ~~24,~~acquisitions ~~2009,~~completed. ~~continued to be held in~~The ~~escrow~~results ~~in accordance with the terms~~ of ~~the~~legal ~~Escrow~~proceedings ~~Agreement~~are ~~dated~~difficult ~~October~~to ~~24, 2008,~~predict by and ~~among~~ the Company, ~~Langer Biomechanics, and The Bank of New York~~cannot ~~Mellon. On~~provide ~~February~~any ~~18,~~assurance ~~2010,~~that ~~Langer~~an ~~Biomechanics~~action ~~filed~~or aproceeding ~~formal claim~~will ofnot ~~indemnification. However,~~be ~~since~~commenced ~~the alleged damages were~~against ~~below~~ the ~~alleged~~Company ~~indemnification~~or ~~threshold~~that in the ~~Asset~~Company ~~Purchase~~will ~~Agreement, Langer~~prevail ~~Biomechanics agreed to release the remaining amount being held~~ in ~~escrow. On~~ ~~March~~any 1,such ~~2010,~~action ~~the remaining escrow balance was released~~or ~~and received by the Company~~proceeding.

Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to claims and litigation in the areas of general liability, including claims of employees, and claims, litigation or other liabilities as a result of acquisitions completed. The results of legal proceedings are difficult to predict and the Company cannot provide any assurance that an action or proceeding will not be commenced against the Company or that the Company will prevail in any such action or proceeding.

An unfavorable resolution of any legal action or proceeding could materially adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock and its business, results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Twincraft and Silipos, we offer a diverse line of personal care products for the private label retail, medical, and therapeutic markets. In addition, at Silipos, we design and manufacture high quality gel-based medical products targeting the orthopedic and prosthetic markets. We sell our medical products primarily in the United States and Canada, as well as in more than 30 other countries, to national, regional, and international distributors. We sell our personal care products primarily in North America to branded marketers of such products, specialty and mass market retailers, direct marketing companies, and companies that service various amenities markets.

Our broad range of gel-based orthopedic and prosthetics products are designed to protect, heal, and provide comfort for the patient. Our line of personal care products includes bar soap, gel-based therapeutic gloves and socks, scar management products, and other products that are designed to cleanse and moisturize specific areas of the body, often incorporating essential oils, vitamins, and nutrients to improve the appearance and condition of the skin.

Twincraft, a manufacturer of bar soap, focuses on the health and beauty, direct marketing, amenities, and mass market channels, was acquired in January 2007, and Silipos, which offers gel-based personal care and medical products, was acquired in September 2004.

Recent Developments:

~~Name~~Notice ~~Change~~of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing

OnAs ~~July 23~~previously disclosed, ~~2009~~on January 11, 2010, wethe ~~changed~~Office ~~our~~of ~~name~~General ~~from~~Counsel ~~Langer,~~(the ~~Inc.~~“Staff”) toof the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) informed PC Group, Inc. ~~The name~~ ~~change~~(the ~~was~~“Company”) ~~approved~~that atthe ~~our~~Nasdaq ~~2009~~Hearings Panel ~~Annual~~(the ~~Meeting~~“Panel”) ofreviewing ~~Stockholders~~the ~~held~~Company’s onlisting ~~July~~had granted the Company 14until July 19, ~~2009. We~~2010 ~~also~~to ~~changed~~achieve ~~our~~a ~~stock~~minimum ~~ticker~~bid ~~symbol~~price onof ~~NASDAQ~~$1.00 ~~from~~or more for at least ~~“GAIT”~~ten toconsecutive ~~“PCGR”~~trading ~~effective~~days atas ~~the~~required ~~commencement~~by ofListing ~~trading~~Rule on5550(a)(2) ~~July~~(the ~~24,~~“Bid ~~2009~~Price Rule”), which has not occurred.

~~The~~On ~~new~~July ~~name~~20, is2010, ~~intended~~the toCompany ~~more~~received ~~accurately~~a ~~reflect~~letter ~~our~~from ~~current~~the ~~business~~Staff ~~model~~indicating ~~and~~that ~~scope~~the ofCompany ~~our~~had ~~product~~not ~~offerings. We~~regained ~~have~~compliance ~~historically~~with ~~designed,~~the ~~manufactured~~ Bid Price Rule and ~~distributed~~that athe ~~broad~~Panel had ~~range~~made ofa ~~medical~~determination ~~products~~to ~~targeting~~delist the ~~orthopedic~~Company’s common stock, ~~orthotic,~~ ~~and~~par ~~prosthetic~~value ~~markets~~$0. ~~Today,~~02 per weshare ~~offer~~(trading asymbol: ~~more~~PCGR), ~~diverse~~from ~~line~~Nasdaq. The Company’s common stock ofwas ~~personal~~suspended ~~care~~from ~~products~~trading ~~for~~on the ~~private~~Nasdaq ~~label~~Capital ~~retail,~~Market ~~medical~~effective ~~and~~at ~~therapeutic~~the opening ~~markets~~of business on July 22, 2010 and the ~~name~~Company PCunderstands ~~Group,~~that ~~Inc.~~Nasdaq iswill subsequently ~~designed~~file toa ~~better~~notification ~~convey~~of ~~this~~removal ~~broader~~from listing on Form 25 with the ~~scope~~Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), with the delisting of ~~products~~the Company’s common stock effective 10 days after such filing.

~~NASDAQ~~The ~~Stock~~Company’s ~~Market~~common ~~Listing~~stock began to be quoted on the OTCQBTM marketplace of the Pink OTC Markets Inc. commencing on July 22, 2010 and it is presently expected that the Company will continue to meet its reporting obligations with the SEC.

On January 11, 2010, we received notice from the Office of General Counsel of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) that our request to transfer the listing of our common stock from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market had been approved by the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”) reviewing our listing. The transfer became effective at the opening of the market on January 13, 2010. Our common stock continues to trade under the symbol “PCGR.” The Panel also granted us until July 19, 2010 to meet the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement of the Nasdaq Capital Market under Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).

We submitted our request to the Panel to transfer to the Nasdaq Capital Market in response to the letter we received from Nasdaq, previously disclosed on the Form 8-K we filed on October 28, 2009, informing us that for 30 consecutive business days our common stock had not maintained the minimum market value of publicly held shares of $5,000,000 for continued inclusion on the Nasdaq Global Market under Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(C).

The Nasdaq Capital Market is a continuous trading market that operates in substantially the same manner as the Nasdaq Global Market. Companies listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market must meet certain financial requirements and adhere to Nasdaq’s corporate governance standards.

Segment Information

We currently operate in two segments, medical products and personal care products. The medical products segment includes the medical, orthopedic and prosthetic gel-based products of Silipos. The operations of Twincraft and the personal care products of Silipos are included in the personal care segment. ~~The medical products segment includes the medical, orthopedic and prosthetic gel-based products of Silipos.~~

For the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, we derived approximately 2420.68% ~~and~~ 23and 20.15%, respectively, of our revenues from continuing operations from our ~~medical~~ medical products segment and approximately 7579.42% and 7679.95%, respectively, from ~~our~~ our personal care products segment. For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010 and 2009, we derived approximately 83.15% and 8489.70%, respectively, of ~~our~~ our revenues from continuing operations from North America, and approximately 16.95% and 1511.30%, ~~of our revenues~~ respectively, from outside North America. Of our revenue derived from North America, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, and 2009, approximately 9093.62% and ~~approximately 97~~89.87%, respectively, was generated in the United States and approximately 96.48% and ~~approximately 2~~10.23%, respectively, was generated from Canada.

For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we derived approximately 17.3% and 18.5%, respectively, of our revenues from continuing operations from our medical products segment and approximately 82.7% and 81.5%, respectively, from our personal care segment. For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we derived approximately 83.8% and 92.3%, respectively, of our revenues from North America, and approximately 16.2% and 7.7%, respectively, of our revenues from outside North America. Of our revenue derived from North America for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately 95.4% and 83.9%, respectively, was generated in the United States and approximately 4.6% and 16.1%, respectively, was generated from Canada.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets comprise a substantial portion (4241.26% at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 43.3% at December 31, 2009) of our total assets. As prescribed under FASB ASC 350-10 (prior authoritative literature: ~~SFAS~~FAS ~~No.~~ 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”), we test annually for possible impairment to goodwill. We engage a valuation analysis expert to prepare the models and calculations used to perform the tests, and we provide them with information regarding our reporting units’ expected growth and performance for future years. The method to compute the amount of impairment incorporates quantitative data and qualitative criteria including new information that can dramatically change the decision about the valuation of an intangible asset in a very short period of time. The Company continually monitors the expected cash flows of its reporting units for the purpose of assessing the carrying values of its goodwill and its other intangible assets. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s reported financial position and results of operations for any particular quarterly or ~~annual~~ annual period. At June 30, 2010 the Company believes its goodwill is not impaired.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company’s market capitalization was approximately $3,~~532~~218,000, which is substantially lower than the Company’s estimated combined fair values of its three reporting units. The Company has completed a ~~reconciliation~~ reconciliation of the sum of the estimated fair values of its reporting units as of October 1, 2009 (the annual testing date) to its market value (based upon its stock price at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010), which included the quantification of a controlling interest premium. The Company has $28.8 million of convertible notes at the corporate level that are not allocated to the reporting units. This was done because this financing was raised for corporate strategic alternatives and not to fund the operations of the individual reporting units. Also, the Company’s corporate-level expenses are not allocated to the individual reporting units as they do not relate to their operations. In addition, the Company considers the following qualitative items that cannot be accurately quantified and are based upon the beliefs of management, but provide additional support for the explanation of the remaining difference between the estimated fair value of the Company’s report units and its market capitalization:

The Company’s stock is thinly traded;

The decline in the Company’s stock price is not correlated to a change in the overall operating performance of the Company; and

Previously unseen pressures are in place given the global financial and economic crisis.

There can be no assurances that the Company’s estimated fair value of its reporting units will be reflected in the Company’s market capitalization in the future.

~~Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009~~17

~~The~~Six ~~Company’s loss from continuing operations before income taxes was approximately $(1,074,000) for the three~~ months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010, compared to a net loss from continuing operations before income taxes of approximately $(1,924,000) for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in the Company’s net loss from continuing operations before income taxes is primarily due to an increase in gross profit of approximately $888,000 due to higher net sales and ~~a higher margin percentage in the three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to the three months ended March 31,~~ 2009. These factors are more fully discussed below. Net loss from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $(1,074,000) or $(0.14) per share on a fully diluted basis, compared to a net loss from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of approximately $(848,908) or $(0.10) per share on a fully diluted basis. The operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 include a non-recurring, non-cash deferred tax benefit of approximately $1,075,000. This benefit results from the reversal of a previously established tax valuation allowance which is no longer required as a result of a change in the estimated useful life of the Silipos tradename from an indefinite life to a useful life of approximately 18 years effective January 1, 2009.

~~Net sales~~The ~~for~~Company’s ~~the~~net ~~three~~loss ~~months~~from ~~ended~~continuing ~~March~~operations ~~31,~~before ~~2010~~income ~~were~~taxes ~~approximately $10,458,000~~was ~~compared to~~ approximately $9(1,~~065~~708,000) for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010, compared to a annet ~~increase~~loss from continuing operations before income taxes of approximately $(1,~~393~~913,000,) orfor 15the six months ended June 30, 2009.~~4%. Twincraft~~ The decrease in the Company’s net ~~sales~~ ~~for~~loss ~~the~~from ~~three~~continuing ~~months~~operations ~~ended~~before ~~March~~income ~~31,~~taxes ~~2010~~was ~~were~~due to an increase in sales of approximately $71,~~464~~385,000, which produced an increase in gross profit of approximately $~~826~~637,000, oroffset ~~12.4%~~by asincreases ~~compared~~in toselling ~~net sales of~~expenses of approximately $6431,~~638,~~000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2009. This~~ ~~increase~~2010 isas ~~attributable~~compared to the ~~new~~six ~~customers~~months ~~obtained~~ended inJune ~~the national~~30, ~~brand-equivalent~~2009 ~~products~~and ~~business~~are asmore ~~well~~fully asdiscussed ~~increases in sales to~~below. Net ~~existing~~loss ~~customers. Silipos’~~from ~~net~~continuing ~~sales~~operations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~ 31June 30, 2010 ~~were~~ was approximately $2(1,~~994~~708,000) or $(0.22) per share on a fully diluted basis, compared anto ~~increase~~a loss from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of approximately $~~568~~(838,000,) or 23$(0.4%10) asper ~~compared~~share toon ~~net~~a ~~sales~~fully ofdiluted basis. The ~~approximately~~operating ~~$2,426,000~~results for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 include a non-recurring, non-cash deferred tax benefit of approximately $1,075,000. This ~~increase~~benefit isresulted ~~primarily~~from the reversal of a previously ~~attributable~~established totax anvaluation ~~increase~~allowance which was no longer required as a result of a change in the ~~volume~~estimated useful life of ~~orders~~the Silipos tradename from ~~certain~~an indefinite ~~existing~~life to a useful life of approximately 18 years effective January 1, ~~customers~~2009.

~~Twincraft’s~~ Net sales for ~~are~~the ~~reported~~six inmonths ~~the~~ended ~~personal~~June ~~care~~30, ~~products~~2010 ~~segment. Also~~were approximately $22,184,000 compared ~~included~~to inapproximately $20,799,000 for the ~~personal~~six ~~care~~months ~~products~~ended ~~segment~~June ~~are~~30, ~~the~~2009, an increase of approximately $1,385,000, or 6.7%, which increase was due to an increase in net sales of Silipos, partially offset by a decrease in net sales of ~~personal~~Twincraft. Twincraft’s ~~care~~net ~~products~~sales ~~which~~for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were approximately $~~424~~15,516,000, ina decline of approximately $183,000 or 1.2% as compared to net sales of approximately $15,699,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, 2009. In the six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, Twincraft experienced a $1.2 million boost to net sales due to an initial order related to one large retailer that did not recur during the six months ended June 30, 2010. In 2010, Twincraft experienced increases in sales to other customers, particularly in the national brand-equivalent market. Silipos’ net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were approximately $6,668,000, an increase of approximately $941,568,000 or 2830.57% as compared to ~~Silipos’~~ net sales of ~~personal~~approximately $5,100,000 ~~care~~for ~~products~~the ofsix ~~approximately~~months ended June 30, 2009. Approximately $~~330~~751,000 of ~~for~~this increase is attributable to one large order received from a new customer, and the ~~three~~remainder is primarily due to an increase in the volume of orders from existing customers during the six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2009~~ 2010.

~~Net~~ Twincraft’s sales are reported in the personal care products segment. Also included in this segment are the net sales of ~~medical~~Silipos personal care products ~~were~~which were approximately $2,~~570~~066,000 in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~ 31June 30, 2010, ~~compared~~an toincrease of approximately $21,~~096~~231,000 inor ~~the~~147.4% ~~three~~as ~~months~~compared ~~ended March~~to ~~31,~~Silipos’ ~~2009,~~net ansales ~~increase~~of personal care products of approximately $~~474~~835,000 orfor 22the six months ended June 30, 2009.6% This aschange was primarily a result of ~~the~~ ~~factors~~one ~~discussed~~large ~~above~~order received from a new customer.

~~Cost~~Net of sales, of onmedical aproducts ~~consolidated~~were ~~basis, increased~~ approximately $~~504~~4,~~000~~602, ~~or 7.3%, to approximately $7,416,~~000 ~~for~~in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010, compared to approximately $64,~~912~~265,000 ~~for~~in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009~~. Cost~~, ofan ~~sales~~increase ~~as a percentage~~ of ~~net~~approximately ~~sales~~$337,000 ~~was 70~~or 7.9% ~~for the~~. The ~~three~~increase ~~months~~was ~~ended~~primarily ~~March~~due ~~31, 2010, as compared~~ to ~~76.2%~~increases ~~for~~in the ~~three~~volume ~~months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in cost~~ of ~~goods~~orders asfrom ~~a percentage~~certain ofexisting ~~net~~customers ~~sales is attributable to a decrease~~ in ~~raw material prices at Twincraft in~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as compared to the ~~three months ended~~six ~~March 31, 2009. In addition, due to higher sales, production levels at Silipos increased in the three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010 as compared to the same period in~~ 2009~~, which resulted in increases to overhead absorption~~.

Cost of sales, inon ~~the~~a ~~medical~~consolidated ~~products~~basis, ~~segment~~increased ~~were~~ approximately $1748,~~219,~~000, or 475.40%, ofto ~~medical~~approximately ~~products~~$15,781,000 ~~net~~for ~~sales in~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to approximately $115,~~162~~033,000 orfor 55the six months ended June 30, 2009.4% Cost of sales ~~medical~~as ~~products~~a percentage of net sales inwas 71.1% for the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to 72.3% for the six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales is primarily attributable to a decrease in raw material prices at Twincraft in the six months ended June 30, ~~largely~~2010 ~~due~~as compared to ~~higher~~the ~~production levels~~six months ended June 30, 2009. ~~which~~This ~~resulted~~was partially offset by an increase in cost of sales as a percentage of net sales at Silipos due to the shipment of a large order to a new customer at a higher ~~manufacturing~~than ~~overhead~~normal ~~absorption~~cost.

Cost of sales ~~for~~in the ~~personal~~medical ~~care~~ products segment were approximately $62,~~197~~398,000, or 7852.61% of medical products net sales ~~of personal care products~~ in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to approximately $52,~~750~~148,000, or 8250.54% of medical products net sales ~~of personal care products~~ in the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, ~~primarily~~largely asdue ato ~~result~~increases ofin ~~the factors~~certain ~~discussed~~raw ~~above~~material prices.

Cost of sales for the personal care products were approximately $13,385,000, or 76.1% of net sales of personal care products in the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to approximately $12,885,000, or 77.9% of net sales of personal care products in the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily as a result of the factors discussed above.

Consolidated gross profit increased approximately $~~888~~637,000, or 4111.31%, to approximately $36,~~041~~403,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to approximately $25,~~153~~766,000 in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. Consolidated ~~gross~~ gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 was 29 28.19%, compared to 2327.87% for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. Increases in net sales, and reductions in raw material prices at Twincraft ~~and~~both ~~higher~~contributed ~~overhead~~to the ~~absorption~~increase ~~all~~in ~~contributed~~consolidated togross profits. These were offset by a change in the ~~increase~~sales mix at Silipos. A greater proportion of Silipos’ net sales were in the personal care market during the six months ended June 30, 2010, ~~consolidated~~which have a lower gross profit percentage than the Silipos medical products.

General and administrative expenses for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 were approximately $13,~~912~~723,000, or 1816.08% of net sales, compared to approximately $23,~~054~~735,000, or 2218.70% of net sales for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, representing a decrease of approximately $~~142~~12,000. ~~Approximately $90,000~~ The ~~of the~~ decrease is comprised ~~related~~of to reductions in salaries and rents of approximately $88,000 as a result of our continuing efforts to reduce our corporate overhead ~~structure. In~~ ~~addition~~structure, reductions in legal fees ~~decreased~~of by approximately $4544,000 , and amortization of intangible ~~intangibles~~assets isof approximately $2959,000 ~~lower in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009~~. These ~~decreases~~reductions were offset by anincreases ~~increase~~ in ~~other professional~~insurance of approximately $40,000, recruiting fees of approximately $3676,000, ~~related~~and toforeign ~~the~~currency ~~search~~exchange ~~for~~expense aof ~~new~~approximately ~~CEO~~$37,000.

Selling expenses increased approximately $~~155~~431,000, or 1319.21%, to approximately $12,~~331~~682,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to approximately $12,~~176~~251,000 ~~for~~ for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales were 12.71% in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to 1310.08% in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. The principal reasons for the increase were an increase in sales salaries and related travel and entertainment expenses at Silipos of approximately $~~104~~272,000 related to the hiring of additional personnel, including the vice- president of sales and marketing in 2009, ~~and~~ an increase in advertising expenses of approximately $90,000 and an increase in royalties of approximately $2046,000.

Research and development expenses increased from approximately $~~235~~439,000 in the ~~three months~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, to approximately $~~246~~456,000 in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~ ~~31,~~June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $1117,000, or 43.79%. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in clinical study costs at Silipos of approximately $5366,000,. This ~~which~~increase was offset by areductions ~~reduction~~ in salaries of approximately $18,000 and supplies of approximately $3632,000.

Interest expense was approximately $~~640~~1,279,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to approximately $~~645~~1,289,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, a decrease of approximately $510,000 as a result of lower interest expense ~~on the~~related ~~capital~~to ~~lease of~~ the Silipos ~~facility~~capital lease obligation.

~~Liquidity~~Three ~~and~~months ~~Capital~~ended ~~Resources~~June 30, 2010 and 2009

~~Working~~The ~~capital~~Company’s asloss offrom ~~March~~continuing ~~31,~~operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately $10(634,~~800,~~000), or $(0.08) per share on a fully diluted basis, compared to income from continuing operations of approximately $11,~~369,~~000, or asless ofthan ~~December~~$0.01 ~~31,~~per ~~2009,~~share on a ~~decrease~~fully ofdiluted ~~approximately~~basis for the three months ended ~~$568~~June 30,~~000~~ 2009. ~~This~~ ~~reduction~~The isprincipal ~~primarily~~reasons for the ~~result~~decrease ofin ~~increases~~income infrom continuing ~~accounts~~operations ~~payable~~for ~~and~~the ~~accrued~~three ~~expenses~~months ofended ~~approximately~~June $130,~~547,000,~~ ~~coupled~~2010 ~~with a~~as ~~decrease~~compared into ~~cash~~the ofthree months ~~approximately~~ended 1June 30,~~421,000,~~ ~~offset~~2009 bywas ~~increases~~a decrease in ~~accounts receivable~~gross profit of approximately $1251,~~862,~~000, increases in general and ~~inventories~~administrative expenses of approximately $~~758~~130,000~~. Unrestricted~~, ~~cash~~and ~~balances~~increases ~~were~~in selling expenses of approximately $3276,~~179,~~000 at. ~~March~~These ~~31,~~changes ~~2010,~~are asmore ~~compared~~fully todiscussed ~~approximately $4,600,000 at December 31, 2009~~below.

Net ~~cash~~sales ~~used~~for inthe ~~operating~~three ~~activities~~months ofended ~~continuing~~June ~~operations~~30, ~~was~~2010 were approximately $11,726,000, compared to approximately $111,~~438~~734,000 infor the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2009, a decrease of approximately $8,000, or 0. ~~The~~1%. ~~cash~~Twincraft’s ~~used~~net ~~is attributable~~sales tofor ~~our~~the ~~loss~~three months ~~from~~ended ~~continuing~~June ~~operations~~30, of2010 were approximately $18,~~074~~052,000, ~~net~~ a decrease of approximately ~~depreciation~~$1, ~~amortization~~008,000 ~~and~~or ~~other~~11.1% ~~non-cash~~as ~~expenses~~compared to net sales of approximately $~~844~~9,060,000 ~~and~~for ~~changes~~the inthree ~~our~~months ~~current~~ended ~~assets~~June ~~and~~30, ~~liabilities~~2009. ofIn ~~approximately~~the six months ended $1June 30,~~207~~ 2009,~~000~~ Twincraft experienced a $1. ~~Net~~2 ~~cash~~million ~~provided~~boost byto ~~operating~~net ~~activities~~sales ofdue ~~continuing~~to an ~~operations~~initial ~~was~~order ~~approximately~~related ~~$29,000~~to ~~for~~one ~~the~~large ~~three~~retailer ~~months~~that ~~ended~~did ~~March~~not ~~31,~~recur ~~2009. The~~in ~~net~~the ~~cash~~six ~~used~~months ended inJune ~~operating~~30, ~~activities~~2010. ofSilipos’ ~~continuing~~net ~~operations~~sales for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010 were isapproximately ~~attributable~~$3,674,000, toan ~~our~~increase ~~loss from continuing operations~~ of approximately $~~(849~~1,000),000 ~~and~~or ~~non-cash~~37.4% as ~~deferred~~compared ~~tax~~to ~~benefit~~net sales of approximately $12,~~075~~674,000, ~~which~~for ~~was~~the ~~offset~~three bymonths ~~non-cash~~ended June ~~depreciation~~30, ~~amortization~~2009. Approximately $751,000 ~~and~~of ~~other~~this increase is due to one large order ~~non-cash~~received ~~expenses~~from ofa ~~approximately~~new ~~$875,000~~customer and ~~changes~~the inremainder ~~the~~is ~~balances~~primarily as a result of ~~current~~increases ~~assets~~in ~~and~~the ~~liabilities~~volume of ~~approximately~~orders ~~$1,078,000~~received from existing customers.

Net cash provided by investing activities was approximately $22,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $234,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2009. Cash flows provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were as a result of cash released from escrow which was related to the sale of Langer Branded Orthotics of approximately $238,000, offset by approximately $216,000 of cash used to purchase equipment. Net cash used in investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2009 reflects the net cash proceeds from the sale of Langer Branded Orthotics of approximately $116,000, offset by purchases of property and equipment of approximately $350,000.

~~The~~Twincraft’s ~~Company~~sales ~~did~~are ~~not~~reported ~~have~~in ~~any~~the ~~cash~~personal ~~flows~~care ~~from~~products ~~financing~~segment. Also ~~activities~~included in the personal care products segment are the ~~three months~~net ~~ended~~sales ~~March~~of 31Silipos personal care products, ~~2010. Cash~~which ~~used~~were inapproximately ~~financing~~$1,641,000 ~~activities~~in ~~for~~ the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~2009~~an ~~was~~increase of approximately $931,136,000 ~~and~~or ~~represents amounts~~225.0% ~~used~~as compared to ~~purchase~~Silipos’ net ~~treasury~~sales ~~stock~~of personal care products of approximately $505,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This change is primarily the result of the factors discussed above.

InNet ~~the~~sales ~~three~~of ~~months~~medical ~~ended~~products ~~March~~were ~~31,~~approximately ~~2010~~$2,032,000 wein ~~generated~~the athree ~~net~~months ~~loss~~ended ~~of approximately~~June ~~$(1~~30,~~074~~ 2010,~~000),~~ compared to ~~a net loss of~~ approximately $~~(925~~2,168,000) ~~for~~in the three months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2009, ana ~~increase~~decrease ~~in net loss~~ of approximately $~~149~~136,000~~. There~~, ~~can~~or be6.3%. This nodecrease ~~assurance that our business will generate~~is ~~cash~~primarily ~~flow~~due ~~from operations sufficient~~ to ~~enable~~a uslower todemand ~~fund~~for our ~~liquidity needs. We~~prosthetic ~~may~~related ~~finance~~products ~~acquisitions~~during ~~of other companies or product~~the ~~lines~~three inmonths ~~the~~ended ~~future~~June ~~from existing cash balances~~30, ~~through~~2010 ~~borrowings~~as ~~from~~compared ~~banks or~~to ~~other institutional lenders, and/or~~ the ~~public~~three ormonths ~~private~~ended ~~offerings~~June ~~of debt~~30, ~~or equity securities~~2009. ~~We cannot make any assurances that any such funds will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all.~~

~~Our~~Cost of ~~Credit~~sales, ~~Facility~~on ~~with~~a ~~Wachovia~~consolidated ~~Bank~~basis, ~~expires~~increased onapproximately ~~September 30~~$243, ~~2011. During 2008~~000, ~~the~~or ~~Company~~3.0%, ~~entered~~to approximately ~~into~~$8,365,000 ~~two~~for ~~amendments that decreased~~ the ~~maximum~~three ~~amount~~months ~~that~~ended ~~the~~June ~~Company~~30, ~~may~~2010, ~~borrow. The~~compared ~~Credit~~to ~~Facility~~approximately $8,122,000 asfor ~~amended,~~the ~~provides~~three anmonths ~~aggregate~~ended ~~maximum~~June ~~availability~~30, if2009. Cost ~~and when~~of ~~the~~sales ~~Company~~as ~~has~~a ~~the~~percentage ~~requisite levels~~ of ~~assets,~~net insales ~~the~~was ~~amount of $12 million~~71. ~~The~~3% ~~Credit~~for ~~Facility~~the ~~bears~~three ~~interest~~months atended ~~0.5~~June ~~percent above the~~30, ~~lender’s~~2010, ~~prime~~as ~~rate~~compared ~~or,~~to atcost ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~sales ~~election,~~as ata ~~2.5~~ percentage ~~points above~~of annet ~~Adjusted~~sales ~~Eurodollar~~of ~~Rate, as defined~~69. ~~The~~2% ~~obligations~~for ~~under~~ the three ~~Credit~~months ~~Facility~~ended ~~are~~June ~~guaranteed~~30, by2009. At ~~the~~Twincraft, ~~Company’s~~cost ~~domestic~~of ~~subsidiaries~~sales ~~and are~~as ~~secured by~~ a percentage ~~first~~of ~~priority~~net ~~security~~sales ~~interest~~was in78.4% ~~all~~for the ~~assets~~three ofmonths ~~the Company~~ended ~~and~~June ~~its~~30, ~~subsidiaries. The~~2010, ~~Credit~~as compared ~~Facility~~to ~~requires~~cost ~~compliance with~~of ~~various~~sales ~~covenants~~as ~~including~~a ~~but~~percentage ~~not~~of ~~limited~~net tosales afor ~~Fixed~~the ~~Charge~~three ~~Coverage~~months ~~Ratio~~ended ofJune ~~not~~30, ~~less~~2009 ~~than~~of 176.~~0 to~~ 1%.0 This atincrease ~~all~~in ~~times~~cost ~~when~~of ~~excess~~sales ~~availability~~as ~~is less~~a ~~than~~percentage ~~$3 million. As~~ of ~~March~~net ~~31,~~sales ~~2010,~~was primarily the ~~Company~~result ~~does~~of ~~not~~increases ~~have~~in ~~any~~labor and ~~outstanding~~shipping ~~advances~~costs ~~under~~that ~~the~~were ~~Credit~~due ~~Facility~~to ~~and~~changes ~~has~~in ~~approximately~~the ~~$8.3 million~~sales ~~(which includes approximately $1~~mix.8 ~~million~~At inSilipos, ~~term~~cost ~~loans~~of sales ~~based~~as ~~upon~~a ~~the value~~percentage of ~~Twincraft’s~~net ~~machinery~~sales ~~and~~was ~~equipment)~~55.9% ~~available~~for ~~under~~ the ~~Credit Facility. Availability~~three ~~under~~months ~~the~~ended ~~Credit~~June ~~Facility~~30, 2010, isas ~~reduced~~compared byto 4045.8% of for the ~~outstanding~~three ~~letters~~months ofended ~~credit~~June ~~related~~30, to2009. This increase ~~the~~in ~~purchase~~cost of ~~eligible~~sales ~~inventory,~~ as ~~defined,~~a ~~and~~percentage ~~100%~~ of ~~all~~net ~~other~~sales ~~outstanding~~was ~~letters~~primarily ofthe ~~credit. At~~result ~~March~~of ~~31,~~a ~~2010,~~greater ~~the~~proportion ~~Company had outstanding letters~~ of ~~credit~~sales ~~related~~in to the ~~purchase~~ ofpersonal ~~eligible~~care ~~inventory~~market ofin ~~approximately~~the ~~$332,000,~~three ~~and no other~~months ~~outstanding~~ended ~~letters~~June of30, ~~credit~~2010.

~~Long-Term~~Cost of ~~Debt~~sales in the personal care products segment were approximately $7,229,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to approximately $7,129,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2009, primarily as a result of the factors discussed above.

OnCost of ~~December~~sales 8,in ~~2006,~~ the ~~Company~~medical ~~entered~~products ~~into~~segment awere ~~note~~approximately ~~purchase agreement for the sale of~~ $281,~~880~~136,000 ~~of 5% convertible subordinated notes due December 7~~, ~~2011 (the~~or ~~“5% Convertible Notes”)~~55. ~~The 5~~9% ~~Convertible Notes are not registered under the Securities Act~~ of ~~1933, as amended. The Company filed a~~ ~~registration~~medical ~~statement~~products ~~with~~net ~~respect~~sales to the shares acquirable upon conversion of the 5% Convertible Notes, including an additional number of shares of common stock issuable on account of adjustments of the conversion price under the 5% Convertible Notes, (collectively, the “Underlying Shares”) in ~~January, 2007, and filed Amendment No. 1 to~~ the registration statement in November, 2007, Amendment No. 2 in April 2008, and Amendments No. 3 and 4 in June 2008; the registration statement was declared effective on June 18, 2008. The 5% Convertible Notes bear interest at the rate of 5% per annum, payable in cash semiannually on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing June 30, 2007. For each of the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~and~~compared ~~2009 the Company recorded interest expense related~~ to ~~the 5% Convertible Notes of approximately~~ ~~$361,000. At~~approximately ~~the date of issuance, the 5% Convertible Notes were convertible at the rate of~~ $~~4.75 per share~~993, ~~subject to certain reset provisions. At the original conversion price at December 31, 2006, the number of Underlying Shares was 6,080,~~000~~. Since the conversion price was above the market price on the date of issuance and there were no warrants attached~~, ~~there~~or ~~was no beneficial conversion~~45. Subsequent to December 31, 2006, on January 8, 2007 and January 23, 2007, in conjunction with common stock issuances related to two acquisitions, the conversion price was adjusted to $4.6706, and the number of Underlying Shares was thereby increased to 6~~,183,359, pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions applicable to the 5~~% ~~Convertible Notes. On May 15, 2007, as a result~~ of ~~the~~medical ~~issuance~~products ofnet ansales additional 68,981 shares of common stock to the Twincraft sellers on account of upward adjustments to the Twincraft purchase price, and the surrender to the Company of 45,684 shares of common stock on account of downward adjustments in the ~~Regal purchase price, the~~three ~~conversion~~months ~~price~~ended ~~under~~June ~~the 5% Convertible Notes was reduced to $4.6617~~30, ~~and the number of Underlying Shares was increased to 6,195,165 shares. This adjustment to the conversion price resulted in an original debt discount of $476,873. Effective January 1,~~ 2009, ~~the~~also ~~Company~~due ~~adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 815-40 which required a retrospective adjustment~~ to the ~~debt~~ ~~discount. At~~factors ~~January 1, 2009, the debt discount was adjusted to~~discussed ~~$1,312,500~~above. This amount will be amortized over the remaining term of the 5% Convertible Notes and be recorded as interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The charge to interest expense relating to the debt discount for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $112,500.

Consolidated gross profit decreased approximately $251,000, or 7.0%, to approximately $3,361,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to approximately $3,612,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2009. Consolidated gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 28.7%, compared to 30.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. At Twincraft, gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 21.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to 23.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The primary reason for the decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was the change in the sales mix at Twincraft. At Silipos, gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 44.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to 54.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The principal reason for the decrease in gross profit is due to a greater proportion of Silipos sales being in the personal care market in the three months ended June 30, 2010.

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were approximately $1,811,000, or 15.4% of net sales, compared to approximately $1,681,000, or 14.3% of net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $130,000. The principal reason for this increase was an increase in salary costs of approximately $70,000 due to the reversal of an accrual related to the Company’s incentive plan in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and an increase in insurance expense of approximately $91,000 due to insurance refunds received in the three months ended June 30, 2009. In addition, our amortization of intangible assets was approximately $30,000 lower in the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009.

Selling expenses increased approximately $275,000, or 25.6%, to approximately $1,350,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to approximately $1,075,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales were 11.5% in the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to 9.2% in the three months ended June 30, 2009. The principal reasons for the increase were an increase in sales salaries and related travel and entertainment expenses at Silipos of approximately $156,000 related to the hiring of additional personnel, an increase in advertising expenses of approximately $62,000 and an increase in royalties of approximately $27,000.

Research and development expenses increased from approximately $204,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2009, to approximately $210,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $6,000, or 2.9%, which was primarily attributable to increases in clinical study costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working capital as of June 30, 2010 was approximately $10,761,000, compared to approximately $11,369,000 as of December 31, 2009. This reduction is primarily the result of increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $2,122,000, coupled with a decrease in cash of approximately $1,548,000, offset by increases in accounts receivable of approximately $2,187,000 and inventories of approximately $1,160,000. Unrestricted cash balances were approximately $3,052,000 at June 30, 2010, as compared to approximately $4,600,000 at December 31, 2009.

Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations was approximately $(1,393,000) in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The cash used is attributable to our loss from continuing operations of approximately $(1,708,000), net of depreciation, amortization, and other non-cash expenses of approximately $1,676,000 and changes in our current assets and liabilities of approximately $(1,361,000). Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was approximately $949,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is attributable to our loss from continuing operations of $(836,000), which was offset by non-cash depreciation, amortization, and other non-cash expenses of approximately $708,000 and changes in the balances of current assets and liabilities of approximately $1,077,000.

Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was approximately $(160,000) in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was approximately $(159,000) in the six months ended June 30, 2009. Cash flows used in investing activities of continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were as a result of cash received from escrow that was related to the sale of th Langer branded custom orthotics and related products business of approximately $238,000, offset by approximately $397,000 of cash used to purchase equipment. Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations in the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects the net cash proceeds from the sale of Langer branded custom orthotics and related products business of approximately $353,000, offset by purchases of property and equipment of approximately $513,000.

Net cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately $19,065 and was attributable to cash received on our note receivable related to our sale of Langer UK. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $(495,000) and was primarily related to the Company’s purchase of treasury stock.

In the six months ended June 30, 2010, we generated a net loss of approximately $(1,708,000), compared to a net loss of approximately $(836,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase in net loss of approximately $872,000. There can be no assurance that our business will generate cash flow from operations sufficient to enable us to fund our liquidity needs. We may finance acquisitions of other companies or product lines in the future from existing cash balances, through borrowings from banks or other institutional lenders, and/or the public or private offerings of debt or equity securities. We cannot make any assurances that any such funds will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all.

Our Credit Facility with Wachovia Bank expires on September 30, 2011. During 2008, the Company entered into two amendments that decreased the maximum amount that the Company may borrow. The Credit Facility, as amended, provides an aggregate maximum availability, if and when the Company has the requisite levels of assets, in the amount of $12 million. The Credit Facility bears interest at 0.5 percent above the lender’s prime rate or, at the Company’s election, at 2.5 percentage points above an Adjusted Eurodollar Rate, as defined. The obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority security interest in all the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Credit Facility requires compliance with various covenants including but not limited to a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 at all times when excess availability is less than $3 million. As of June 30, 2010, the Company does not have any outstanding advances under the Credit Facility and has approximately $8.3 million (which includes approximately $1.8 million in term loans based upon the value of Twincraft’s machinery and equipment) available under the Credit Facility. Availability under the Credit Facility is reduced by 40% of the outstanding letters of credit related to the purchase of eligible inventory, as defined, and 100% of all other outstanding letters of credit. At June 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit related to the purchase of eligible inventory of approximately $457,000 and no other outstanding letters of credit.

Long-Term Debt

On December 8, 2006, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement for the sale of $28,880,000 of 5% convertible subordinated notes due December 7, 2011 (the “5% Convertible Notes”). The 5% Convertible Notes are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company filed a registration statement with respect to the shares acquirable upon conversion of the 5% Convertible Notes, including an additional number of shares of common stock issuable on account of adjustments of the conversion price under the 5% Convertible Notes, (collectively, the “Underlying Shares”) in January, 2007, and filed Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement in November, 2007, Amendment No. 2 in April 2008, and Amendments No. 3 and 4 in June 2008; the registration statement was declared effective on June 18, 2008. The 5% Convertible Notes bear interest at the rate of 5% per annum, payable in cash semiannually on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing June 30, 2007. For each of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2008 the Company recorded interest expense related to the 5% Convertible Notes of approximately $722,000. At the date of issuance, the 5% Convertible Notes were convertible at the rate of $4.75 per share, subject to certain reset provisions. At the original conversion price at December 31, 2006, the number of Underlying Shares was 6,080,000. Since the conversion price was above the market price on the date of issuance and there were no warrants attached, there was no beneficial conversion. Subsequent to December 31, 2006, on January 8, 2007 and January 23, 2007, in conjunction with common stock issuances related to two acquisitions, the conversion price was adjusted to $4.6706, and the number of Underlying Shares was thereby increased to 6,183,359, pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions applicable to the 5% Convertible Notes. On May 15, 2007, as a result of the issuance of an additional 68,981 shares of common stock to the Twincraft sellers on account of upward adjustments to the Twincraft purchase price, and the surrender to the Company of 45,684 shares of common stock on account of downward adjustments in the Regal purchase price, the conversion price under the 5% Convertible Notes was reduced to $4.6617, and the number of Underlying Shares was increased to 6,195,165 shares. The adjustment to the conversion price resulted in an original debt discount of $476,873. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 815-40 which required a retrospective adjustment to the debt discount. At January 1, 2009, the debt discount was adjusted to $1,312,500. This amount will be amortized over the remaining term of the 5% Convertible Notes and be recorded as interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The charge to interest expense relating to the debt discount for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately $112,500 and $225,000, respectively.

The principal of the 5% Convertible Notes is due on December 7, 2011, subject to the earlier call of the 5% Convertible Notes by the Company, as follows: (i) the 5% Convertible Notes could not be called prior to December 7, 2007; (ii) from December 7, 2007, through December 7, 2009, the 5% Convertible Notes may be called and redeemed for cash, in the amount of 105% of the principal amount of the 5% Convertible Notes (plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, through the call date); (iii) after December 7, 2009, the 5% Convertible Notes may be called and redeemed for cash in the amount of 100% of the principal amount of the 5% Convertible Notes (plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, through the call date); and (iv) at any time after December 7, 2007, if the closing price of the common stock of the Company on the NASDAQ (or any other exchange on which the Company’s common stock is then traded or quoted) has been equal to or greater than $7.00 per share for 20 of the preceding 30 trading days immediately prior to the Company’s issuing a call notice, then the 5% Convertible Notes shall be mandatorily converted into common stock at the conversion price then applicable. The Company had a Special Meeting of Stockholders on April 19, 2007, at which the Company’s stockholders approved the issuance by the Company of the shares acquirable on conversion of the 5% Convertible Notes.

In the event of a default on the 5% Convertible Notes, the due date of the 5% Convertible Notes may be accelerated if demanded by holders of at least 40% of the 5% Convertible Notes, subject to a waiver by holders of 51% of the 5% Convertible Notes if the Company pays all arrearages of interest on the 5% Convertible Notes. Events of default are defined to include change in control of the Company.22

~~The~~In the ~~payment~~event of ~~interest~~a ~~and~~default ~~principal~~on of the 5% Convertible Notes, isthe ~~subordinate~~due to date of the ~~Company’s~~5% Convertible ~~presently~~Notes ~~existing~~may ~~capital~~be ~~lease~~accelerated ~~obligations,~~if indemanded ~~the~~by ~~amount~~holders of at least 40% of ~~approximately~~the $25% Convertible Notes,~~700,000~~ assubject to a waiver by holders of ~~March~~51% ~~31,~~of ~~2010,~~the ~~and~~5% Convertible Notes if the Company’s ~~obligations under~~pays ~~its~~all ~~Credit~~arrearages ~~Facility.~~of ~~The~~interest on the 5% Convertible Notes. Events ~~would~~of ~~also~~default beare ~~subordinated~~ defined to ~~any~~include ~~additional~~change ~~debt~~in control ~~which~~of the Company. The ~~may~~Company ~~incur~~anticipates ~~hereafter~~needing ~~for~~to ~~borrowed~~refinance ~~money,~~all or ~~under~~a ~~additional~~portion ~~capital~~of ~~lease~~the ~~obligations~~5% Convertible Notes, ~~obligations~~as ~~under~~the ~~letters~~Company ofdoes not expect to have ~~credit,~~sufficient ~~bankers’~~cash ~~acceptances~~from oroperations ~~similar~~to ~~credit~~repay ~~transactions~~such indebtedness in full at maturity. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to refinance such indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

InThe ~~connection~~payment ~~with~~of ~~the~~interest ~~sale~~and principal of the 5% Convertible Notes, ~~the~~is ~~Company~~subordinate ~~paid a~~to ~~commission~~the ofCompany’s ~~$1,338,018~~presently ~~based~~existing oncapital alease ~~rate~~obligations, ofin ~~4% of~~ the amount of ~~5% Convertible~~ ~~Notes~~approximately ~~sold~~$2,700,000 ~~excluding~~as ~~the 5% Convertible Notes sold to members~~ of ~~the~~June ~~Board of Directors and their affiliates~~30, ~~to Wm. Smith & Co.~~2010, ~~who~~and ~~served~~the asCompany’s ~~placement~~obligations ~~agent~~under inits ~~the~~Credit ~~sale~~Facility. ofThe ~~the~~ 5% Convertible Notes. ~~The~~would ~~total~~also ~~cost~~be ~~of raising these~~subordinated ~~proceeds~~to ~~was~~any ~~$1,338,018,~~additional debt which ~~will~~the beCompany ~~amortized~~may ~~through~~incur ~~December~~hereafter 7,for ~~2011,~~borrowed ~~the~~money, ~~due~~or ~~date~~under ~~for~~additional ~~the~~capital ~~payment~~lease ofobligations, ~~principal~~obligations onunder ~~the~~letters ~~5% Convertible Notes. The~~of ~~amortization~~credit, ofbankers’ ~~these~~acceptances ~~costs~~or ~~for~~similar ~~the~~credit ~~three months ended March 31, 2010 was $66,187~~transactions.

In connection with the ~~acquisition~~sale of ~~Silipos~~the 5% Convertible Notes, the Company ~~assumed~~paid ~~the obligation~~a ~~under~~commission of $1,338,018 based on a ~~capital~~rate ~~lease~~of ~~covering~~4% of the ~~land~~amount ~~and~~of ~~building~~5% atConvertible Notes sold, excluding the ~~Silipos~~5% ~~facility~~Convertible inNotes sold to members of the Board of ~~Niagara~~Directors ~~Falls~~and their affiliates, Nto Wm.Y Smith & Co., ~~that~~who ~~expires~~served as placement agent in ~~2018~~the sale of the 5% Convertible Notes. ~~This~~The ~~lease~~total ~~also~~cost ~~contains~~of ~~two~~raising ~~five-year~~these ~~renewal~~proceeds ~~options.~~was As$1,338,018, ofwhich ~~March~~will 31be amortized through December 7, ~~2010~~2011, the due ~~Company’s~~date ~~obligation~~for ~~under~~the payment of principal on the 5% Convertible Notes. The ~~capital~~amortization ~~lease~~of isthese costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $266,~~700~~187 and $132,~~000~~373, respectively.

Pursuant to the acquisition of Silipos, the Company is obligated under a capital lease covering the land and building at the Silipos facility in Niagara Falls, N.Y. that expires in 2018. This lease also contains two five-year renewal options. As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s obligation under capital lease is $2,700,000.

Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results

Information contained or incorporated by reference in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, in other SEC filings by the Company, in press releases, and in presentations by the Company or its management, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which can be identified by the Company of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof, other variations thereon or comparable terminology or by discussions of strategy. No assurance can be given that future results covered by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. Such forward- looking statements include, but are not limited to, those relating to the Company’s financial and operating prospects, future opportunities, the Company’s acquisition strategy and ability to integrate acquired companies and assets, outlook and financial health of customers, and reception of new products, technologies, and pricing. In addition, such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, the delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market and actions taken by holders of our common stock in response to this announcement; the willingness of market makers to trade the Company's common stock on the Pink Sheets; the history of net losses and the possibility of continuing net losses during and beyond 2010,; the current economic downturn and its effect on the credit and capital markets as well as the industries and customers that utilize our products,; the risk that any intangibles on our balance sheet may be deemed impaired resulting in substantial write-offs,; the risk that ~~the Company may not be able to maintain a listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market, the risk that~~ we may not be able to raise adequate financing to fund ~~our~~ our operations and growth prospects,; ~~the~~risks ~~risk~~associated ~~that~~with ~~the~~our ~~clinical~~ability ~~study related~~ to ~~our~~ ~~gel-care~~repay ~~scar~~debt ~~management~~obligations, ~~products~~including ~~will~~the ~~not~~risk bethat ~~positive,~~the ~~risks~~Company ~~associated~~is ~~with our~~unable ~~ability~~ to ~~repay~~finance its ~~debt~~5% ~~obligations,~~Convertible Notes; the cost and expense of complying with ~~government~~ government regulations which affect the research, development and formulation of ~~our~~ our products,; changes in our relationships with customers,; declines in the ~~business~~ business of our customers,; the loss of major customers,; risks associated with ~~the~~ the acquisition and integration of businesses we may acquire,; and other factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’'s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’'s latest annual report on Form 10-K and most recently filed Forms 8-K and 10-Q. Also, the Company’s business could be materially adversely affected and the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline if any such risks and uncertainties develop into actual events. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

2123

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The following discussion about the Company’s market rate risk involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

In general, business enterprises can be exposed to market risks, including fluctuation in commodity and raw material prices, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates that can adversely affect the cost and results of operating, investing, and financing. In seeking to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with such activities, the Company manages exposure to changes in commodities and raw material prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates through its regular operating and financing activities. The Company does not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, nor does the Company utilize leveraged financial instruments or other derivatives.

The Company’s exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s short-term monetary investments. There is a market rate risk for changes in interest rates earned on short-term money market instruments. There is inherent rollover risk in the short-term money instruments as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and business financing requirements. However, there is no risk of loss of principal in the short-term money market instruments, only a risk related to a potential reduction in future interest income. Derivative instruments are not presently used to adjust the Company’s interest rate risk profile.

The majority of the Company’s business is denominated in United States dollars. There are costs associated with the Company’s operations in foreign countries, primarily the United Kingdom and Canada that require payments in the local currency, and payments received from customers for goods sold in these countries are typically in the local currency. The Company partially manages its foreign currency risk related to those payments by maintaining operating accounts in these foreign countries and by having customers pay the Company in those same currencies.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who are, respectively, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

2324

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. This section supplements and updates that discussion and you should read both together. The risks described below and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Our common stock is traded on the Pink OTC Markets Inc. which may adversely affect our stock.

The Company’s common stock began to be quoted on the OTCQBTM marketplace of the Pink OTC Markets Inc. (or Pink Sheets) commencing on July 22, 2010. The Pink OTC Markets are viewed by most investors as a less desirable, and less liquid, marketplace than Nasdaq. As a result, there could be an adverse impact on the price of our shares of common stock, the volatility of the price of our shares could increase and/or the liquidity in our common stock could decrease as investors may find it more difficult to purchase, dispose of or obtain accurate quotations as to the value of our common stock.

Additionally, as a result of delisting from Nasdaq, our common stock may be subject to the SEC’s so-called “penny stock” rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions, including suitability determinations for investors other than established customers of the broker and “accredited investors”. If our common stock is determined to be a penny stock, a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock on the secondary market.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

~~Consulting~~On ~~Agreement~~August 4, 2010, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Twincraft, Inc. (“Twincraft”), entered into a third amendment (the “Amendment”) to its existing sublease agreement dated October 1, 2003 (as amended, the “Essex Lease”) with Asch Enterprises, LLC (“Asch Enterprises”), a Vermont limited liability ~~Kanders &~~company, the principal of which is ~~Company~~Peter A. Asch, a director of the Company and President of Twincraft. ~~Inc~~ Pursuant to the Essex Lease, Twincraft leases approximately 76,000 square feet in Essex, Vermont, for use as a warehouse facility. The term of the Essex Lease was scheduled to expire on October 1, 2010. The Amendment extends the term of the Essex Lease for a period commencing on October 1, 2010 and expiring on September 30, 2015 (the “Extended Term”). Pursuant to the Amendment, Twincraft has the right to terminate the Essex Lease during the Extended Term upon two months’ prior written notice to Asch Enterprises, effective at any time following the first year of the Extended Term. In the event of such a termination, in addition to any rent owing to Asch Enterprises, Twincraft will pay Asch Enterprises a termination fee of $104,362.50 prior to the effective date of such termination. The foregoing summary of the terms of the Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amendment, which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this report.

On May 5, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Kanders & Company, Inc. (“Kanders & Company”), the sole stockholder of which is Warren B. Kanders, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, and who is the sole manager and voting member of Langer Partners, LLC, the Company’s largest stockholder. The Consulting Agreement provides that Kanders & Company will act as the Company's non-exclusive consultant to provide the Company with strategic consulting and corporate development services for a term of one year. Kanders & Company will receive, pursuant to the agreement, an annual fee of $300,000 in addition to separate compensation for assistance, at the Company’s request, with certain transactions. The Company has also agreed to provide Kanders & Company with indemnification protection which survives the termination of the Consulting Agreement for six years, and extends to any actual or wrongfully attempted breach of duty, neglect, error or misstatement by Kanders & Company alleged by any claimant. The Consulting Agreement replaces a previous agreement for similar consulting services (the “Prior Agreement”), pursuant to which Kanders & Company received an annual fee of $300,000 and the indemnification protection described above. The Prior Agreement expired on November 12, 2007, but during 2008 and 2009, Kanders & Company continued to render consulting services to the Company and the Company continued to pay for such services in accordance with the terms of the expired Prior Agreement, as approved by the Board of Directors. The foregoing summary of the terms of the Consulting Agreement between the Company and Kanders & Company is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Consulting Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this report.

Agreement with W. Gray Hudkins

On May 5, 2010, in recognition of the agreement of W. Gray Hudkins’, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, to forego $200,000 of the $300,000 base compensation for fiscal year 2010 to which he is entitled under his Employment Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2007 (the “Employment Agreement”), between Mr. Hudkins and the Company, the Company agreed to waive for 2010 the requirement of the Employment Agreement that Mr. Hudkins devote his full business time and energies to the business and affairs of the Company. Instead, during 2010, Mr. Hudkins agrees to devote such business time and energies to the business and affairs of the Company as the Company and Mr. Hudkins will agree upon, from time to time, as necessary and appropriate. The foregoing summary of the terms of the agreement between the Company and Mr. Hudkins is qualified in its entirety by reference to the agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to this report.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description
10.1		~~Consulting~~Third ~~Agreement~~Amendment, dated ~~May~~August 54, 2010, ~~between~~to ~~the~~Lease ~~Company~~dated ~~and~~October ~~Kanders~~1, &2003, ~~Company~~as amended, between Twincraft, Inc. and Asch Enterprises, LLC.
10.2		Agreement, dated May 5, 2010, between the Company and W. Gray Hudkins.
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	PC GROUP, INC.
Date: May 5, 2010	By:	/s/ W. GRAY HUDKINS
Date: August 10, 2010	By:	/s/ W. GRAY HUDKINS
		W. Gray Hudkins
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 5, 2010	By:	/s/ KATHLEEN P. BLOCH
Date: August 10, 2010	By:	/s/ KATHLEEN P. BLOCH
		Kathleen P. Bloch
		Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
		Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description
10.1		~~Consulting~~Third ~~Agreement~~Amendment, dated ~~May~~August 54, 2010, ~~between~~to ~~the~~Lease ~~Company~~dated ~~and~~October ~~Kanders~~1, &2003, ~~Company~~as amended, between Twincraft, Inc. and Asch Enterprises, LLC.
10.2		Agreement, dated May 5, 2010, between the Company and W. Gray Hudkins.
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

Filing Compare · PC GROUP, INC.