UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-D

ASSET-BACKED ISSUER

DISTRIBUTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly distribution period from

~~August~~November 1, 2023 to ~~October~~January 31, ~~2023~~2024

Commission File Number of issuing entity: 333-164557-01

Central Index Key Number of issuing entity: 0001493611

SLC STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2010-1

(Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Commission File Number of depositor: 333-164557

Central Index Key Number of depositor: 0001164019

SLC STUDENT LOAN RECEIVABLES I, INC.

(Exact name of depositor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor: 0000893955

THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION

(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Delaware		04-3598719
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of the issuing entity)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization of the
4000 Regent Boulevard C2B-260 Irving, Texas (Address of principal executive offices of the issuing entity)		75063 (Zip Code)
issuing entity)

4000 Regent Boulevard		75063
C2B-260		(Zip Code)
Irving, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices
of the issuing entity)

(469) 220-4928

(Telephone number including area code)

Registered/reporting pursuant to (check one)

Title of class	Section 12(b)	Section 12(g)	Section 15(d)	Name of exchange (If Section 12(b))

Class A Student Loan Asset Backed Notes	☐	☐	☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☑ No ☐

PART I — DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION

Item 1.

Distribution and Pool Performance Information.

On February ~~November 27~~26, ~~2023~~2024, SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1 (the “Trust”) made its regular quarterly distribution of funds to holders of its Student Loan Asset Backed Notes for the distribution period commencing on ~~August~~November 1, 2023 and ending on ~~October~~January 31, ~~2023~~2024. There is no activity to report under Rule 15Ga-1(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the Trust for the distribution period referred to in the preceding sentence. The depositor filed its most recent report on Form ABS-15G on February 1412, ~~2023~~2024 (such report is available at www.sec.gov under the depositor’s CIK No. 0001164019). The sponsor filed its most recent report on Form ABS-15G on February 8, ~~2023~~2024 (such report is available at www.sec.gov under the sponsor’s CIK No. 0000893955). The related Quarterly Distribution Report is attached as Exhibit 99.1.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2.

Legal Proceedings.

The following four paragraphs are disclosure received from Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.) (“Navient Solutions”), the successor subservicer for this transaction.

Navient Corporation (“Navient”) has been named as defendant in a number of putative class action and other cases alleging violations of various state and federal consumer protection laws including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the ~~Consumer~~ Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), in adversarial proceedings under the United States Bankruptcy Code, and various state consumer protection laws. At ~~this~~ this point in time, Navient is unable to anticipate the timing of a resolution or the impact that these legal proceedings may have on its consolidated financial position, liquidity, results of operation or cash flows. As a result, it is not possible at at this time to estimate a range of potential exposure, if any, for amounts that may be payable in connection with these matters and loss contingency accruals have not been established. It is possible that an adverse ruling or rulings may have a material adverse impact on Navient, Navient Solutions and/or their affiliates or on the financial ability of the depositor, the servicer or a seller to fulfill an obligation to purchase or repurchase trust student loans in connection with a breach of representation, warranty or covenant. In January 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the CFPB) and Attorneys General for the State of Illinois and the State of Washington initiated civil actions naming Navient and several of its subsidiaries (including Navient Solutions) as defendants alleging violations of certain Federal and State consumer protection statutes, including the CFPA, FCRA, FDCPA and various state consumer protection laws. The Attorneys General for the States of Pennsylvania, California, Mississippi, and New Jersey also initiated actions against Navient and certain subsidiaries alleging violations of various state and federal consumer protection laws based upon similar alleged acts or failures to act. In addition to these matters, a number of lawsuits have been filed by nongovernmental parties or, in the future, may be filed by additional governmental or nongovernmental parties seeking damages or other remedies related to similar issues raised by the CFPB and the State Attorneys General. In January 2022, Navient entered into a series of Consent Judgment and Orders (the “Agreements”) with 40 State Attorneys General to resolve all matters in dispute related to the State Attorneys General cases as well as the related investigations, subpoenas, civil investigative demands and inquiries from various other state regulators. These Agreements do not resolve the litigation involving Navient and the CFPB. Navient has cancelled the loan balance of approximately 66,000 borrowers with qualifying Private Education Loans that were originated largely between 2002 and 2010 and later defaulted and charged off. The loans cancelled have aggregate outstanding balances of approximately $1.7 billion. The expense to Navient to cancel these loans was approximately $50 million which represents the amount of expected future recoveries of these charged-off loans on the balance sheet. In addition, Navient agreed to make a one-time payment of approximately $145 million to the states. In the fourth quarter of 2021 when such loss became probable, Navient recognized total regulatory expenses of approximately $205 million related to this matter. As Navient has previously stated, Navient believes the allegations in the CFPB suit are false and that they improperly seek to impose penalties on Navient based on new, previously unannounced servicing standards applied retroactively against only one servicer. Navient therefore has denied these allegations and is vigorously defending against the allegations in that case. Due to recent developments in connection with the CFPB case, Navient increased its accrual for probable incurred loss in this matter to $72.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. The litigation process is not predictable and can lead to unexpected results and therefore it is reasonably possible that Navient’s exposure to loss may exceed any amounts accrued. On April 12, 2023, Navient reached an agreement in principle (“Settlement”) with certain plaintiffs for a nationwide settlement of claims raised in the following bankruptcy adversary actions: Coyle v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 22-80018 (Bankr. W.D. Mich.); Homaidan v. SLM Corp., No. 1:17-ap-01085 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.); Mazloom v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 20-80033-6 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y.); and Woodard v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 08-81442 (Bankr. D. Neb.) collectively referred to as the “Bankruptcy Cases.” The Settlement has received final court approval. Under the Settlement, Navient will forego the collection of defined balances for borrowers or co-borrowers of certain private loans — all of which were originated prior to Navient’s separation — who have received a discharge in bankruptcy during the periods covered by the agreements. As a result, Navient recorded a $23 million additional private loan provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2023 related to the estimated future charge offs that are expected to occur. Navient has also agreed to fund settlement funds. Navient anticipates that any cash contribution it will be required to make to these funds will not exceed $44 million in the aggregate and will be fully covered by insurance. The net impact to operating expense for this element of the settlement for the first quarter of 2023 was $0 due to the accrual of the offsetting insurance reimbursements.

InThe ~~January~~following ~~2017,~~two ~~the~~paragraphs ~~Consumer~~are ~~Financial~~disclosure ~~Protection~~received ~~Bureau~~from ~~(the~~Deutsche ~~“CFPB”)~~Bank ~~and~~National ~~the~~Trust ~~Attorneys~~Company ~~General for the State of Illinois~~ and ~~the~~Deutsche ~~State~~Bank ofTrust ~~Washington~~Company Americas. ~~initiated~~Deutsche ~~civil~~Bank ~~actions~~National ~~naming~~Trust ~~Navient~~Company ~~and several of its subsidiaries~~ (~~including Navient Solutions~~“DBNTC”) ~~as defendants alleging violations of certain Federal~~ and ~~State~~Deutsche ~~consumer~~Bank ~~protection~~Trust ~~statutes,~~Company ~~including~~Americas ~~the~~(“DBTCA”) CFPA, the FCRA, the FDCPA and various state consumer protection laws. The Attorneys General for the States of Pennsylvania, California, Mississippi, and New Jersey also initiated actions against Navient and certain subsidiaries alleging violations of various state and federal consumer protection laws based upon similar alleged acts or failures to act. In addition to these matters, a number of lawsuits have been ~~filed~~sued by ~~nongovernmental~~investors ~~parties or,~~ in ~~the~~civil ~~future,~~litigation ~~may~~concerning betheir ~~filed~~role byas ~~additional~~trustees governmental or nongovernmental parties seeking damages or other remedies related to similar issues raised by the CFPB and the State Attorneys General. In January 2022, Navient entered into a series of ~~Consent~~certain ~~Judgment~~residential ~~and~~mortgage-backed ~~Orders~~securities (~~the~~ “~~Agreements~~RMBS”) ~~with 40 State Attorneys General to resolve all matters in dispute related to the State Attorneys General cases as well as the~~ ~~related investigations, subpoenas, civil investigative demands and inquiries from various other state regulators~~ trusts. ~~These Agreements do not resolve the litigation involving Navient and the CFPB.~~

~~Navient~~On ~~believes~~December ~~the~~30, ~~allegations~~2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the ~~CFPB~~Supreme ~~suit~~Court ~~are~~of ~~false~~the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that ~~they~~DBNTC ~~improperly~~and ~~seek~~DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to ~~impose~~dismiss. On ~~penalties~~January on6, ~~Navient~~2017 ~~based~~and onJune ~~new~~20, ~~previously~~2017, ~~unannounced~~IKB ~~servicing~~voluntarily ~~standards~~dismissed ~~applied~~with ~~retroactively~~prejudice ~~against~~all ~~only~~claims ~~one~~as ~~servicer~~to seven trusts. On ~~Navient~~January ~~therefore~~27, 2021, the court ~~has~~ granted in part and denied ~~these~~in ~~allegations~~part DBNTC and isDBTCA’s ~~vigorously~~motion ~~defending~~to ~~against~~dismiss. The court granted the ~~allegations~~motion into ~~that~~dismiss ~~case~~with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the TIA. The ~~Due~~court denied the remainder of the motion to ~~recent~~dismiss. IKB’s ~~developments~~remaining inclaims ~~connection~~for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed. On May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the ~~CFPB~~New ~~case~~York Supreme Court Appellate Division, ~~Navient~~First ~~accrued~~Department, regarding certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a ~~probable~~notice ~~incurred~~of ~~loss~~cross appeal with respect to other aspects of ~~$45~~that ~~million~~order. On August 30, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department affirmed in part and reversed in part the ~~third~~court’s ~~quarter~~order ofon ~~2023~~the motion to dismiss. ~~The~~After DBNTC and DBTCA appealed the First Department’s decision, on June 15, 2023, the New York Court of Appeals reversed the First Department’s decision in part, dismissing ~~litigation~~ certain ~~process~~additional iscontract ~~not~~claims, ~~predictable~~as well as IKB’s claims for breach of fiduciary duty and ~~can~~breach ~~lead~~of duty to ~~unexpected~~avoid ~~results~~conflicts ~~and~~of ~~therefore~~interest. On itJune is2, ~~reasonably~~2021, ~~possible~~IKB ~~that~~filed ~~Navient~~a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects of the court’s ~~exposure~~order on the motion to ~~loss~~dismiss, ~~may~~which ~~exceed~~the ~~any~~court ~~amounts~~denied ~~accrued~~on August 3, 2021. On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint. On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional trusts. On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additional trust. On April 22, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to 17 certificates at issue, including all claims as to 5 trusts. On February 28, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to two trusts, leaving 15 trusts at issue. On November 21, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to three trusts, leaving 12 trusts at issue. Discovery is ongoing.

OnIt ~~April~~is ~~12,~~DBTCA’s 2023, Navient reached an agreement in principle (“Settlement”) with certain plaintiffs for a nationwide settlement of claims raised in the following bankruptcy adversary actions: Coyle v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 22-80018 (Bankr. W.D. Mich.); Homaidan v. SLM Corp., No. 1:17-ap-01085 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.); Mazloom v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 20-80033-6 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y.); and ~~Woodard~~DBNTC’s v.belief ~~Navient Solutions,~~that ~~LLC,~~they ~~No.~~have ~~08-81442~~no ~~(Bankr.~~pending D.legal ~~Neb.) collectively referred to as the “Bankruptcy Cases.” This settlement in principle is subject~~proceedings, ~~among other things~~including, tobased ~~final~~on ~~documentation~~DBTCA’s and final court approval. Under the Settlement, Navient will forego the collection of defined balances for borrowers or co-borrowers of certain private loans — all of which were originated prior to NavientDBNTC’s ~~separation — who have received a discharge in bankruptcy during the periods covered by the~~present ~~agreements. As a result~~evaluation, ~~Navient~~the ~~recorded~~litigation adisclosed ~~$23 million additional private loan provision for loan losses~~ in the ~~first~~immediately ~~quarter~~preceding ofparagraphs ~~2023 related to the estimated future charge offs~~ that ~~are~~would ~~expected~~materially toaffect ~~occur.~~their ~~Navient~~ability ~~has also agreed~~ to ~~fund settlement~~perform ~~funds.~~their ~~Navient~~duties ~~anticipates~~as ~~that~~Trustee ~~any~~under ~~cash contribution it will be required to make to these funds will not exceed $44 million in~~ the ~~aggregate~~Indenture ~~and will be fully covered by insurance. The net impact to operating expense~~ for this ~~element of the settlement for the first quarter of 2023 was $0 due to the accrual of the offsetting insurance reimbursements~~transaction.

Item 10.

Exhibits.

(a) 99.1 Quarterly Distribution Report for SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1 in relation to the distribution on ~~November~~February 2726, ~~2023~~2024.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number		Exhibit
99.1		Quarterly Distribution Report for SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1 in relation to the distribution on ~~November~~February 2726, ~~2023~~2024.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	SLC STUDENT LOAN RECEIVABLES I, INC.
Dated: December 8, 2023	By:	/s/ Charles Jacques
Dated: March 8, 2024	By:	/s/ Charles Jacques
	Name:	Charles Jacques
	Title:	President

Filing Compare · SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1