UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012.

o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________.

Commission File Number 001-10255

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		94-2904044
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6900 Paseo Padre Parkway Fremont, CA		94555-3660
(Address of principal executive office)		(ZIP Code)

(510) 713-7300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes ¨o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

xYes ¨o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨o Accelerated filer xo Non-accelerated filer ¨x Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

¨o Yes x No

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01, as of ~~January~~July 27, 2012 was 30,~~507~~587,000.

Page 1 of 24

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 30, 2011 and March 25, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 29, 2012 and March 30, 2012	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss – Three and Nine Months Ended December 30, 2011 and December 24, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss – Three Months Ended June 29, 2012 and June 24, 2011	4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine Months Ended December 30, 2011 and December 24, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three Months Ended June 29, 2012 and June 24, 2011	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6	~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~
	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	21
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	22
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1	Legal Proceedings
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	22
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors
Item 1A. Risk Factors	22
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	23
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	23
	Item 5.	Other Information
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure	23
	Item 6.	Exhibits
Item 5. Other Information	24
SIGNATURES
Item 6. Exhibits	24
SIGNATURES	24

Page 2 of 24

Index

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited — in thousands, except par value)

	December 30, 2011			March 25, 2011
	June 29, 2012			March 30, 2012
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	35,~~832~~888		$	26,~~367~~897
Short-term investments		3122,~~104~~383			5626,~~860~~245
Restricted cash		1,~~942~~941			21,~~192~~940
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $235 at December 30, 2011 and $234 at March 25, 2011		11,637			8,701
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $263 at June 29, 2012 and $212 at March 30, 2012		8,096			7,525
Inventories		32,~~639~~263			23,~~991~~093
Prepaid expenses and other assets		43,~~150~~974			53,~~860~~636
Total current assets		5644,~~304~~545			7849,~~971~~336
Property and equipment, net		3,~~728~~047			43,~~435~~344
Other assets		43,~~777~~217			53,~~965~~139
Total assets	$	6450,809		$	8955,~~371~~819
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	34,~~940~~763		$	54,~~496~~009
Accrued liabilities		98,~~338~~996			109,~~262~~462
Total current liabilities		13,278			15,758
Current portion of 7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures		1,204			—
Total current liabilities		14,963			13,471
Long-term liabilities:
3¾% convertible senior notes		10,500			10,500
7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures		2322,~~704~~500			23,704
Capital lease obligation, less current portion		8263			~~137~~73
Other long-term liabilities		1,~~474~~089			1,~~097~~129
Total long-term liabilities		3534,~~760~~152			35,~~438~~406
Commitments and contingencies – See Notes 7 and 10
Commitments and contingencies – See Note 8
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none outstanding)		—			—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 75,000 shares authorized; 30,507 and 30,389 shares outstanding at December 30, 2011 and March 25, 2011)		305			303
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 75,000 shares authorized; 30,587 and 30,550 shares outstanding at June 29, 2012 and March 30, 2012)		306			305
Additional paid-in capital		~~260~~262,~~783~~246			~~258~~261,~~339~~563
Treasury stock, at cost		(11,~~783~~811	)		(11,~~532~~811	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,~~388~~071	)		(2,~~108~~145	)
Accumulated deficit		(~~231~~246,~~146~~976	)		(~~206~~240,~~827~~970	)
Total stockholders’ equity		151,~~771~~694			386,~~175~~942
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6450,809		$	8955,~~371~~819

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Page 3 of 24

Index

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited — in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended						~~Nine Months Ended~~
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Revenue:
Product	$	7,~~094~~509		$	107,~~553~~699		$	~~27,744~~		$	~~37,281~~
Service and other		43,~~112~~907			3,~~368~~614			~~11,203~~			~~10,351~~
Total revenue		11,~~206~~416			1311,~~921~~313			~~38,947~~			~~47,632~~
Costs of revenue:
Cost of product		5,~~233~~118			65,~~163~~353			~~18,845~~			~~19,090~~
Cost of service and other		21,~~043~~556			2,~~699~~112			~~6,251~~			~~8,828~~
Total cost of revenue		76,~~276~~674			87,~~862~~465			~~25,096~~			~~27,918~~
Gross margin		34,~~930~~742			53,~~059~~848			~~13,851~~			~~19,714~~
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		43,~~736~~501			54,~~320~~464			~~14,408~~			~~15,076~~
Research and development		43,~~640~~601			4,~~803~~821			~~14,597~~			~~14,457~~
General and administrative		2,~~305~~972			2,~~237~~498			~~7,426~~			~~8,149~~
Restructure and other costs		—121			~~297~~—			—			~~297~~
Total operating expenses		1110,~~681~~195			1211,~~657~~783			~~36,431~~			~~37,979~~
Loss from operations		(75,~~751~~453	)		(7,~~598~~935	)		~~(22,580~~	)		~~(18,265~~	)
Interest income		7442			~~298~~106			~~277~~			~~731~~
Interest expense		(~~552~~551	)		(~~554~~553	)		~~(1,658~~	)		~~(1,661~~	)
Other income (expense), net		(785	)		6534			~~(82~~	)		7
Loss before taxes		(85,~~307~~967	)		(78,~~789~~348	)		~~(24,043~~	)		~~(19,188~~	)
Income tax provision		5738			3372			~~276~~			~~238~~
Net loss	$	(86,~~364~~005	)	$	(78,~~822~~420	)	$	~~(24,319~~	)	$	~~(19,426~~	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.2720	)	$	(0.2628	)	$	~~(0.80~~	)	$	~~(0.65~~	)
Common and common equivalent shares, basic and diluted		30,~~483~~573			2930,~~848~~316			~~30,374~~			~~29,814~~
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss:
Net loss	$	(86,~~364~~005	)	$	(78,~~822~~420	)	$	~~(24,319~~	)	$	~~(19,426~~	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		3191			~~(23~~83	)		~~(152~~	)		~~(284~~	)
Gross unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities		(4	)		(168	)		(67	)		(71	)
Gross unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities		(22	)		80
Less: Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net loss		6			(57	)		(61	)		(147	)
Less: Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net loss		5			(36	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(85,~~331~~931	)	$	(8,~~070~~293	)	$	~~(24,599~~	)	$	~~(19,928~~	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Page 4 of 24

Index

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited — in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	Three Months Ended
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	$	26,~~367~~897		$	42,~~953~~367
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		(246,~~319~~005	)		(198,~~426~~420	)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion		~~1,601~~534			~~1,946~~560
Stock-based compensation expense		~~2,454~~703			~~4,504~~883
Loss on disposition of property and equipment		—			28
Provision for deferred income taxes		28			62
Provision for deferred income taxes		275			203
Other		—			(1	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(~~2,936~~571	)		41,~~196~~333
Inventories		~~(648~~830	)		~~1,018~~(257	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		~~2,487~~(533	)		~~2,092~~885
Accounts payable		~~(1,555~~756	)		(~~1,344~~862	)
Accrued liabilities		(~~605~~480	)		(41,~~611~~315	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(234,~~246~~738	)		(117,~~395~~131	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of short-term investments		(232,~~469~~774	)		(335,~~405~~385	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments		496,~~097~~619			4815,~~929~~499
Purchases of property and equipment		(~~680~~134	)		(~~1,284~~204	)
Change in restricted cash		250			(1,637	)
Changes in restricted cash		(1	)		—
Net cash provided by investing activities		253,~~198~~710			129,~~603~~910
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock		1			~~289~~1
Repurchase of common stock		(~~253~~21	)		(~~863~~113	)
Payments under capital lease and note payable obligations		(~~101~~35	)		(4733	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~353~~55	)		(~~621~~145	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		~~(134~~74	)		~~(281~~79	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1,465			306
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,009	)		2,713
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	35,~~832~~888		$	5,~~259~~080
Other cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	21,~~122~~058		$	21,~~112~~060
Non-cash investing activities:
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities		(128	)		(218	)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities		(17	)		44
Assets acquired under capital lease		—			47

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Page 5 of 24

Index

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business: Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company or NET) provides network and VoIP solutions to enterprises and government agencies that seek to reduce the cost to deploy next generation unified and secure communications applications. For over a quarter of a century, NET has delivered solutions for multi-service networks requiring high degrees of versatility, security and performance. Today, the Company’s broad family of products enables interoperability and integration with existing networks for migration to secure IP-based communications. Broadening NET’s voice solutions, Quintum Technologies (Quintum), now a part of NET, is a VoIP innovator whose applications bring the reliability and clarity of public telephone networks to Internet telephony and unified communications. NET was founded in 1983.

~~Liquidity: With~~Merger ~~the~~Agreement exception of fiscal 2008, the Company has incurred net losses since fiscal 1998. The Company believes that existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months. However, if the effects of the restructuring that the Company commenced in January 2012 are not materially consistent with ~~management’s~~Sonus ~~expectations~~Networks, the Company may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues during that period, which may require the Company to evaluate alternatives and take appropriate steps to address such issues, either by further reducing cash consumption, raising additional capital, or a combination of measuresInc. If such steps are needed the Company cannot be assured that it will be able either to sufficiently reduce cash consumption without adverse effects on its business or to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, if at all.:

~~Significant~~On ~~Accounting~~June ~~Policies: The~~18, ~~unaudited~~2012, ~~condensed~~Network ~~consolidated~~Equipment ~~financial~~Technologies, ~~statements~~Inc. of(“NET”) ~~the~~entered ~~Company~~into ~~included~~an ~~herein~~Agreement ~~have~~and ~~been~~Plan ~~prepared~~of inMerger ~~accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in~~ (the ~~United~~“Merger ~~States~~Agreement”) ofwith ~~America~~Sonus ~~for~~Networks, ~~interim~~Inc. ~~financial~~(“Sonus”), ~~information~~ and ~~pursuant~~Navy toAcquisition ~~the~~Subsidiary, ~~rules~~Inc., ~~and~~a ~~regulations~~direct ofwholly-owned ~~the~~subsidiary ~~Securities~~of ~~and~~Sonus ~~Exchange Commission~~ (~~SEC).~~“Merger ~~Accordingly~~Sub”), ~~they~~pursuant doto ~~not~~which, ~~contain~~subject ~~all~~to of the ~~information~~satisfaction ~~and~~or ~~footnotes~~waiver ~~required~~of bycertain ~~accounting~~conditions, ~~principles~~Merger ~~generally~~Sub ~~accepted~~will inmerge ~~the~~with ~~United~~and ~~States~~into ofNET ~~America~~and ~~for~~NET ~~complete~~will ~~financial~~become ~~statements.~~a ~~The~~direct ~~condensed~~wholly-owned ~~consolidated~~subsidiary ~~balance sheet as~~ of ~~March~~Sonus ~~25, 2011 was derived from~~ (the ~~Company’s audited consolidated financial statements~~“Merger”).

~~These~~On ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~terms ~~should~~and besubject ~~read~~to inthe ~~conjunction~~conditions ~~with~~of the ~~March~~Merger 25Agreement, ~~2011~~at ~~audited~~the ~~consolidated~~effective ~~financial~~time ~~statements~~of ~~and~~the ~~notes~~Merger ~~thereto~~(the ~~included~~“Effective inTime”), ~~the~~each ~~Company’s~~share ~~Form~~of ~~10-K~~common ~~for~~stock, ~~fiscal~~par ~~year~~value ~~2011,~~$0.01 asper ~~filed~~share, ~~with~~of NET (the ~~SEC.~~“NET ~~The~~Common ~~results~~Stock”) ofissued ~~operations~~and ~~for~~outstanding immediately prior to the ~~three~~Effective ~~and~~Time ~~nine~~(other ~~months~~than ~~ended~~shares ~~December~~owned 30by (i) Sonus, ~~2011~~Merger ~~are~~Sub ~~not~~or ~~necessarily~~any ~~indicative~~other direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ~~the~~Sonus, ~~results~~(ii) toNET or any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of NET or (iii) stockholders who have properly exercised and perfected appraisal rights under Delaware law) will be ~~expected~~converted ~~for~~automatically into the ~~fiscal~~right ~~year~~to ~~ending~~receive ~~March~~$1.35 ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~cash or(the ~~any~~“Merger ~~future~~Consideration”), ~~period~~without interest.

The ~~Company’s~~Merger ~~fiscal~~Agreement ~~year~~provides ~~ends~~that, onat the ~~last~~Effective ~~Friday~~Time, ineach ~~March.~~(i) InNET ~~most~~stock ~~years~~option that is unexpired, unexercised and outstanding as of the ~~fiscal~~Effective ~~year~~Time, whether vested or unvested, and that has an exercise price per share that is 52less ~~weeks~~than the Merger Consideration, ~~with~~and ~~each~~(ii) ~~quarter~~NET ~~comprised~~restricted stock unit (“RSU”) that is outstanding as of ~~thirteen~~the ~~weeks~~Effective Time, ~~which~~will ~~allows~~be ~~comparability~~assumed ofby ~~quarter~~Sonus ~~over~~and ~~quarter~~will ~~results~~become exercisable to acquire Sonus stock. ~~Fiscal~~The ~~year~~vesting ~~2012~~of ~~includes~~such assumed options and RSUs will not be accelerated as a ~~53rd~~result ~~week,~~of ~~with~~the consummation of the ~~extra~~Merger, ~~week~~provided ~~included~~that inif the ~~three~~service ~~month~~of ~~period~~the ~~ended~~holder ~~September~~of ~~30,~~such ~~2011.~~assumed Inoption or RSU to the ~~opinion~~surviving corporation of ~~management~~the Merger, ~~the~~Sonus ~~accompanying~~or ~~condensed~~any ~~consolidated~~other ~~financial~~affiliate ~~statements~~of ~~contain~~Sonus ~~all~~is ~~adjustments~~terminated by such entity (~~consisting~~and ~~only~~in ofconnection ~~normal~~therewith ~~recurring~~such ~~adjustments)~~holder ~~considered~~does ~~necessary~~not tothereafter ~~present~~commence ~~fairly~~service ~~the~~with ~~financial~~Sonus ~~position~~or asan affiliate of Sonus such that vesting of such assumed option or RSU would continue) on or before December 3031, ~~2011,~~2012 for a reason other than (i) a willful act by such holder that constitutes misconduct or fraud and has a material adverse effect on the ~~results~~entity terminating such holder or (ii) a conviction of ~~operations~~such ~~for~~holder ~~the~~of ~~three~~a felony crime, such assumed option or RSU shall upon such termination vest and ~~nine~~become ~~months~~exercisable ~~ended~~in ~~December~~full. 30The Merger Agreement provides further that, ~~2011~~immediately ~~and~~prior ~~December~~to 24the Effective Time, ~~2010~~each NET stock option that is unexpired, ~~respectively~~unexercised and ~~the~~outstanding ~~cash~~and ~~flows~~that ~~for~~has ~~the~~an ~~nine~~exercise ~~months~~price ~~ended~~per ~~December~~share ~~30,~~that ~~2011~~is greater than or equal to the Merger Consideration shall vest and ~~December~~become 24exercisable in full and will, ~~2010~~to the extent not exercised, ~~respectively~~terminate and cease to be outstanding without consideration at the Effective Time.

~~Revenue Recognition:~~ The ~~Company~~Merger ~~derives~~Agreement ~~revenue~~provides ~~primarily~~that, ~~from~~prior to the ~~sales~~closing of ~~hardware~~the Merger, ~~software~~in accordance with the respective terms and requirements of the existing indentures referred to below, ~~services~~the Company will prepare supplemental indentures for each of (i) the 7 1/4 % Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2014 issued by NET under the Indenture, ~~post-contract~~dated ~~support~~as of May 15, 1989 (~~PCS~~“1989 Debentures” and the “1989 Indenture,” respectively), between NET and ~~professional~~U.S. ~~services~~Bank National Association (“U.S. ~~PCS~~Bank”), ~~typically~~successor ~~includes~~to ~~unspecified~~Morgan ~~software~~Guaranty ~~updates~~Trust Company of New York, and ~~upgrades~~(ii) onthe an3 ~~if-~~3/4% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 issued by NET under the Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2007 (“2007 Notes” and~~-when~~ ~~available~~the ~~basis~~“2007 Indenture,” respectively), between NET and ~~telephone~~U.S. Bank, which supplemental indentures shall provide, among other things, that, from and ~~internet~~after ~~access~~the toEffective ~~technical~~Time, ~~support~~in ~~personnel~~lieu of being convertible into shares of NET Common Stock, the 1989 Debentures and the 2007 Notes will be convertible into the kind and amount of Merger Consideration that would have been receivable upon the consummation of the Merger by a holder of the number of shares of NET Common Stock issuable on conversion of such 1989 Debentures or 2007 Notes, respectively, as of the Effective Time. At the closing of the Merger, the supplemental indentures will be executed and delivered to U.S. Bank.

InPage ~~October~~6 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition to remove tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality from the scope of ~~industry specific software revenue recognition guidance. In October 2009, the FASB also amended the standards for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements to:~~24

(i) provide updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and how the arrangement consideration should be allocated among its elements;

(ii) require an entity to allocate the revenue using estimated selling prices (ESP) of the deliverables if there is no vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) or third party evidence of selling price (TPE); and

(iii) eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method.

This new accounting guidance became applicable to the Company beginning the first quarter of its fiscal 2012. The Company adopted this guidance for transactions that were entered into or materially modified on or after March 26, 2011 using the prospective basis of adoption.

Product revenue is recognized when the Company has a contract with its customer, the product has been shipped as required by the contract and risk of loss has passed to its customer, the price is fixed or determinable, and the collectability of the related receivable is probable. If the customer has a right of acceptance and the Company has not yet obtained acceptance, revenue is deferred until the terms of acceptance are satisfied. When product revenue is deferred, the Company also defers the associated cost of goods until the revenue is recognized. The Company recognizes service revenue upon completion of the service or, for ongoing services such as PCS, ratably over the period of the contract.

Index

~~NETWORK~~NET ~~EQUIPMENT~~and ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~Sonus’ respective obligations to complete the Merger are subject to customary conditions, ~~INC~~including (i) the approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the NET Common Stock entitled to vote on the Merger (the “Stockholder Approval”) and (ii) the absence of any injunction, judgment or ruling prohibiting the Merger. Moreover, each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger is subject to certain other conditions, including (i) the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties (subject to materiality exceptions) and (ii) the other party’s compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to materiality exceptions). The consummation of the Merger is not subject to a financing condition. NET has made customary representations and warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including covenants regarding: (i) the conduct of NET’s business prior to the consummation of the Merger and (ii) the calling and holding of a meeting of NET’s stockholders for the purpose of obtaining the Stockholder Approval. In addition, under the terms of the Merger Agreement, NET agreed not to solicit or support any alternative acquisition proposals, subject to specified exceptions for the Company to respond to and support unsolicited proposals in the exercise of the fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors. NET will be obligated to pay a termination fee of $1,250,000 to Sonus upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including if NET terminates the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms to accept a unsolicited superior proposal.

~~Notes~~The Merger is expected to ~~Condensed~~close ~~Consolidated~~in ~~Financial~~the ~~Statements~~third quarter of calendar year 2012.

~~(Continued)~~Liquidity: With the exception of fiscal 2008, the Company has incurred net losses since fiscal 1998. The Company believes that existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months. However, if the effects of the restructuring that the Company commenced in January 2012 and continued in March 2012 are not materially consistent with management’s expectations, the Company may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues during that period, which may require the Company to evaluate alternatives and take appropriate steps to address such issues, either by further reducing cash consumption, raising additional capital, or a combination of measures. If such steps are needed the Company cannot be assured that it will be able either to sufficiently reduce cash consumption without adverse effects on its business or to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, if at all.

~~Revenue~~Significant onAccounting ~~sales~~Policies: The ~~through~~unaudited ~~resellers~~condensed isconsolidated ~~recognized~~financial ~~upon~~statements ~~transfer~~ of ~~title to~~ the ~~reseller. Many of the sales to the~~ Company’s ~~resellers~~included ~~are~~herein ~~based~~have ~~upon~~been ~~firm~~prepared ~~commitments~~in ~~from~~accordance ~~their~~with ~~end~~accounting ~~customer;~~principles asgenerally aaccepted ~~result,~~in ~~these~~the ~~resellers~~United ~~carry~~States ~~little or no inventory~~ of ~~NET~~America ~~products.~~for ~~For~~interim ~~the~~financial ~~Company’s~~information ~~Promina, VX, NX~~ and UXpursuant ~~products, NET’s customers generally do not have the right~~ to ~~return~~ the ~~equipment.~~rules ~~For~~and ~~the~~regulations ~~Company’s Tenor product line, NET customers are subject to agreements allowing for limited rights~~ of ~~return~~the Securities and ~~price~~Exchange ~~protection~~Commission (SEC). Accordingly, ~~revenues~~they ~~are~~do ~~reduced~~not ~~for~~contain ~~the~~all ~~Company’s estimates~~ of ~~liability~~the ~~related~~information toand ~~these~~footnotes ~~rights.~~required ~~The~~by ~~estimate~~accounting ~~for~~principles ~~returns~~generally isaccepted ~~recorded~~in at the ~~time~~United ~~the~~States ~~related sale is recognized and is adjusted periodically based on historical rates~~ of ~~returns~~America ~~and~~for ~~other~~complete ~~related~~financial ~~factors~~statements. The ~~reserves~~condensed ~~for~~consolidated ~~price~~balance ~~protection~~sheet ~~are~~as ~~recorded~~of atMarch ~~the~~30, ~~time~~2012 ~~these~~was ~~programs~~derived ~~are~~from ~~offered.~~the ~~Price~~Company’s ~~protection~~audited isconsolidated ~~estimated~~financial ~~based on specific programs, expected usage and historical experience~~statements.

~~The~~These ~~new~~financial ~~revenue~~statements ~~recognition~~should ~~guidance~~be ~~does~~read ~~not~~in ~~generally~~conjunction ~~change~~with the ~~units~~March of30, ~~accounting~~2012 ~~for~~audited ~~the~~consolidated ~~Company’s~~financial ~~revenue~~statements ~~transactions. All of the products~~ and ~~services~~notes ~~continue~~thereto toincluded ~~qualify~~in asthe ~~separate units of accounting. The~~ Company’s ~~analyzes~~Form ~~all~~10-K offor ~~its~~fiscal ~~products~~year 2012, ~~software~~as ~~and~~filed ~~services~~with ~~and considers~~ the ~~features~~SEC. ~~and~~The ~~functionalities~~results of ~~the~~operations ~~individual~~for ~~elements and~~ the ~~stand-alone~~three ~~sales~~months ofended ~~those~~June ~~individual components among other factors~~29, to2012 ~~determine which elements~~ are ~~essential~~not ornecessarily ~~non-essential~~indicative ~~to the overall functionality~~ of the ~~networking~~results ~~equipment. The Company’s core software (herein after referred~~ to asbe ~~‘essential~~expected ~~software’)~~for ~~is integrated with hardware and is essential to~~ the ~~functionality~~fiscal ofyear ~~the~~ending ~~networking~~March ~~equipment. The Company’s sale of additional software provides increased features and functions~~29, ~~but~~2013 isor ~~not~~any ~~essential~~future ~~to the overall functionality of the networking equipment (herein after referred to as ‘non-essential software’)~~period.

~~For~~The ~~transactions~~Company’s ~~entered into prior to the first quarter of~~ fiscal ~~2012,~~year ~~the~~ends ~~Company recognized revenue based~~ on ~~ASC~~the ~~985-605~~last ~~(formerly~~Friday ~~referred~~in ~~to as SOP No~~March. ~~97-2, Software Revenue Recognition).~~ In ~~accordance~~most ~~with ASC 985-605~~years, the ~~Company~~fiscal ~~utilized~~year ~~the~~is ~~residual~~52 ~~method~~weeks, towith ~~determine~~each ~~the~~quarter ~~amount~~comprised of ~~product~~thirteen ~~revenue~~weeks, towhich beallows ~~recognized.~~comparability ~~Under~~of ~~the~~quarter ~~residual~~over ~~method,~~quarter ~~the~~results. ~~fair~~Fiscal ~~value~~year of2012 ~~the~~included ~~undelivered~~a ~~elements,~~53rd ~~such as PCS~~week, iswith ~~deferred and~~ the ~~remaining~~extra ~~portion~~week ofincluded in the ~~arrangement~~three ~~consideration~~month isperiod ~~recognized~~ended asSeptember ~~product~~30, ~~revenue~~2011. ~~VSOE~~In ofthe ~~fair~~opinion ~~value~~of ismanagement, ~~limited to~~ the ~~price~~accompanying ~~charged~~condensed ~~when~~consolidated ~~the~~financial ~~same~~statements ~~element~~contain isall ~~sold~~adjustments ~~separately.~~(consisting ~~VSOE~~only of ~~fair~~normal ~~value~~recurring isadjustments) ~~established~~considered ~~for~~necessary ~~PCS~~to ~~and~~present ~~professional~~fairly ~~services based on~~ the ~~volume~~financial ~~and~~position ~~pricing~~as of ~~the~~June ~~stand-alone~~29, ~~sales~~2012, ~~within~~the aresults ~~narrow~~of ~~range.~~operations ~~The~~for ~~fair~~the ~~value~~three ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~post-contractual~~June ~~support~~29, is2012 ~~recognized~~and onJune a24, ~~straight-line~~2011, ~~basis~~respectively ~~over~~and the ~~term~~cash offlows for the ~~related~~three ~~support~~months ~~period,~~ended ~~which~~June is29, ~~typically~~2012 ~~one~~and ~~month~~June to24, ~~three~~2011, ~~years~~respectively.

~~For~~There ~~transactions~~have ~~entered~~been ~~into~~no ormaterial ~~materially~~changes ~~modified on or after the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the total arrangement fees were allocated~~ to ~~all~~ the ~~deliverables based on their respective relative selling prices. The relative selling price is determined using VSOE when available. When VSOE cannot be established, the~~ Company ~~attempts to determine the TPE for the deliverables. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately by the competitors. Generally the Company~~’s ~~product~~significant ~~offerings~~accounting ~~differ~~policies ~~from~~during ~~those~~the ofthree ~~its~~months ~~competitors~~ended ~~and~~June ~~comparable~~29, ~~pricing of its competitors is often not available. Therefore~~2012, ~~the~~as ~~Company~~compared ~~is typically not able~~ to ~~determine TPE. When~~ the ~~Company~~significant isaccounting ~~unable~~policies todisclosed ~~establish~~in ~~selling~~Note ~~price~~1 ~~using~~of ~~VSOE or TPE,~~ the ~~Company~~Consolidated ~~uses~~Financial ~~ESP~~Statements in ~~its~~the ~~allocation~~Company’s ofAnnual ~~arrangement~~Report ~~fees.~~on ~~The~~Form ~~ESP~~10-K ~~for a deliverable is determined~~ (as ~~the~~amended) ~~price~~for ~~at which~~ the ~~Company~~year ~~would~~ended ~~transact~~March if30, ~~the products or services were sold on a stand-alone basis~~2012.

~~The~~Recently ~~Company~~Issued ~~has~~Accounting ~~been~~Standards: In ~~able~~June to2011, ~~establish~~the ~~VSOE~~FASB ~~for~~issued ~~its~~Accounting ~~PCS~~Standards ~~and~~Update ~~professional~~(“ASU”) ~~services~~No. ~~based~~2011-05, onComprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This ASU amends ASC 220 to allow an entity the ~~volume~~option to present income and comprehensive income, the ~~pricing~~components of net income, and the ~~stand~~components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-~~alone~~05 ~~sales~~eliminates ~~for~~the ~~these~~option ~~services~~to ~~within~~present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance which indefinitely defers the guidance related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. As the Company has historically presented a ~~narrow~~separate ~~range~~statement of comprehensive income (loss), the adoption of this ASU did not have any effect upon its financial statement presentation.

~~The~~Page ~~Company~~7 ~~has determined the ESP~~ of its products and services for which VSOE has not been established based on an analysis of (i) the list price, which represents a component of the Company’s current go-to market strategy, as established by senior management taking into consideration factors such as geography and the competitive and economic environment and (ii) an analysis of the historical pricing with respect to both the Company’s bundled and stand-alone sales of each product or service.24

The Company’s multiple element arrangements may include non-essential software deliverables that are subject to the industry specific software revenue recognition guidance. The revenue for these multiple element arrangements is allocated to the non-essential software deliverables and the non-software deliverables based on the relative selling prices of all of the deliverables in the arrangement using the hierarchy in the new revenue accounting guidance. As the Company has not been able to obtain VSOE for all of the non-essential software deliverables in the arrangement, revenue allocated to such non-essential software elements is recognized using the residual method in accordance with industry specific software revenue recognition guidance as the Company was able to obtain VSOE for the undelivered elements bundled with such non-essential software elements. Under the residual method, the amount of revenue recognized for the delivered non-essential software elements equaled the total allocated consideration less the VSOE of any undelivered elements bundled with such non-essential software elements.

Index

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Continued)

The change from the residual to the relative selling price method did not have a material impact on the allocation of revenue to the arrangement deliverables, nor did the Company change its assessment of the deliverables contained within its revenue arrangements. The adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance was not material to the Company’s financial results for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards: In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This ASU amends the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (Codification) to allow an entity the option to present income and comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance which indefinitely defers the guidance related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. The Company will adopt this new guidance on the mandatory adoption date of March 31, 2012, the beginning of the Company’s fiscal 2013. We do not anticipate the adoption of this ASU will have any effect upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This ASU represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the IASB (the Boards) on fair value measurement. The Company will adopt this new guidance, on a prospective basis, on December 31, 2011, the beginning of the fourth quarter of the Company’s fiscal 2012. We do not anticipate the adoption of this ASU will have a material effect upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to amend and clarify existing guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures: ASU No. 2010-06 — Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This guidance requires entities to separately present purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in their reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements (i.e., to present such items on a gross basis rather than on a net basis), and clarifies existing disclosure requirements regarding the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for measurements that fall within either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance effective March 27, 2010, except for the requirement to disclose purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements related to Level 3 measurements, which the Company adopted on March 26, 2011, the beginning of the Company’s fiscal 2012.

The adoption of ASU 2010-06 was not material to the Company’s financial results for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011.

Index

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Continued)

Note 2.

Financial Instruments

Short-term investments at ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 and March 2530, ~~2011~~2012 consisted of the following:

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
December 30, 2011
June 29, 2012
U.S. Treasury notes	$	3,~~324~~003	$	3—	$	(41	)	$	3,~~323~~002
U.S. government agencies		67,~~400~~892		127		(41	)		67,~~408~~898
Corporate notes and bonds		149,~~798~~053		1315		(352	)		149,~~776~~066
Asset backed securities		51,~~581~~914		143		(31	)		51,~~592~~916
Other debt securities		~~1,005~~501		—		—			~~1,005~~501
	$	3122,~~108~~363	$	4225	$	(465	)	$	3122,~~104~~383
March 25, 2011
March 30, 2012
U.S. Treasury notes	$	3,~~222~~953	$	102	$	(13	)	$	3,~~231~~952
U.S. government agencies		177,~~297~~465		3410		~~(15~~—	)		177,~~316~~475
Corporate notes and bonds		2010,~~507~~757		6624		(133	)		2010,~~560~~778
Asset backed securities		143,~~187~~530		619		(212	)		143,~~227~~537
Other debt securities		~~1,523~~503		4—		(1—	)		~~1,526~~503
	$	5626,~~736~~208	$	~~175~~45	$	(518	)	$	5626,~~860~~245

The maturities of short-term investments at ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 are as follows:

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Estimated Market Value
Maturing in one year	$	78,~~299~~472	$	78,~~291~~480
Maturing in one to five years		2313,~~809~~890		2313,~~813~~903
Total	$	3122,~~108~~362	$	3122,~~104~~383

Page 8 of 24

Index

~~NETWORK~~The ~~EQUIPMENT~~following ~~TECHNOLOGIES,~~table ~~INC.~~summarizes the financial assets and liabilities of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at June 29, 2012, using
	Balance as of June 29, 2012		Level 1		Level 2
Assets:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	3,002	$	3,002	$	—
U.S. government agencies		7,898		—		7,898
Corporate notes and bonds		9,066		—		9,066
Asset backed securities		1,916		—		1,916
Other debt securities		501		—		501
Total(1)	$	22,383	$	3,002	$	19,381

(Continued)

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at March 30, 2012, using
	Balance as of March 30, 2012		Level 1		Level 2
Assets:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	3,952	$	3,952	$	—
U.S. government agencies		7,475		—		7,475
Corporate notes and bonds		10,778		—		10,778
Asset backed securities		3,537		—		3,537
Other debt securities		503		—		503
Total(1)	$	26,245	$	3,952	$	22,293

The following table summarizes the financial assets of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 30, 2011, using
	Balance as of December 30, 2011		Level 1		Level 2
Assets:
U.S. Treasury notes(1)	$	3,323	$	3,323	$	—
U.S. government agencies(1)		6,408		—		6,408
Corporate notes and bonds(1)		14,776		—		14,776
Asset backed securities(1)		5,592		—		5,592
Foreign debt issues(1)		1,005		—		1,005
Total	$	31,104	$	3,323	$	27,781

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at March 25, 2011, using
	Balance as of March 25, 2011		Level 1		Level 2
Assets:
U.S. Treasury notes(1)	$	3,231	$	3,231	$	—
U.S. government agencies(1)		17,316		—		17,316
Corporate notes and bonds(1)		20,560		—		20,560
Asset backed securities(1)		14,227		—		14,227
Foreign debt issues(1)		1,526		—		1,526
		56,860		3,231		53,629
Foreign currency derivatives(2)		31		—		31
Total	$	56,891	$	3,231	$	53,660

(1)

Included in short-term investments on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.

(2) Included in accounts receivable on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

~~Derivative~~The ~~financial~~valuation ~~instruments~~techniques ~~are~~used ~~limited~~ to ~~foreign~~measure ~~exchange contracts which~~ the ~~Company~~fair ~~enters~~value ~~into~~of tofinancial ~~hedge certain balance sheet exposures and intercompany balances against future movement in foreign exchange rates. The Company’s primary net foreign currency exposures are in Japanese yen~~instruments, ~~Euros,~~all ~~and British pounds. The fair value~~ of ~~the~~which ~~Company’s~~have ~~derivative~~counterparties ~~instruments~~with ishigh ~~determined~~credit ~~using~~ratings, ~~pricing~~were ~~models~~valued based on ~~current~~quoted market ~~rates.~~prices ~~Gains~~or ~~and~~model ~~losses~~driven onvaluations ~~foreign~~using ~~exchange~~significant ~~contracts~~inputs ~~are~~derived ~~included~~from inor ~~other~~corroborated ~~income~~by ~~and~~observable ~~expense,~~market ~~net, and were not material for any period presented~~data. ~~As of December 30, 2011, the Company had no outstanding foreign exchange contracts.~~

Investments are classified within Level 1 if quoted prices are available in active markets.

Page 9 of 24

Index

~~NETWORK~~Items ~~EQUIPMENT~~are ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~classified in Level 2 if the investments are valued using quoted prices for identical assets in markets that are not active, ~~INC~~using quoted prices for similar assets in an active market, or using model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets.

~~Notes~~The toCompany ~~Condensed~~did ~~Consolidated~~not ~~Financial~~hold ~~Statements~~financial assets or liabilities which were recorded at fair value using inputs in the Level 3 category as of June 29, 2012 and March 30, 2012.

~~(Continued)~~Derivative financial instruments are limited to foreign exchange contracts which the Company enters into to hedge certain balance sheet exposures and intercompany balances against future movement in foreign exchange rates. The Company’s primary net foreign currency exposures are in Japanese yen, Euros, and British pounds. The fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments is determined using pricing models based on current market rates. Gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts are included in other income and expense, net, and were not material for any period presented. As of June 29, 2012, the Company had no outstanding foreign exchange contracts.

Note 3.

Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

(in thousands)	~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012		March 2530, ~~2011~~2012
Purchased components	$	~~2,248~~947	$	1,~~368~~811
Finished goods		1,~~391~~316		1,~~623~~282
	$	32,~~639~~263	$	23,~~991~~093

Certain inventories, not expected to be consumed within the next 12 months, are included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as non-current assets. These inventories were $~~1.6~~674,000 ~~million~~ and $~~2.5 million~~622,000, respectively, at ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 and March 2530, ~~2011~~2012.

~~Subsequent~~Under tothe Company’s agreement with its primary contract manufacturer, Plexus Corp. (Plexus), the ~~issuance~~Company maintains a level of ~~the~~control ~~fiscal~~over ~~2011~~parts ~~consolidated~~procurement, ~~financial~~design, ~~statements~~documentation, ~~management~~and ~~determined~~selection ~~that~~of ~~certain~~approved ~~inventories~~suppliers. The Company is generally liable for any termination or cancellation of product orders, ~~not~~as ~~expected~~well as excess and obsolete material, which can result, for example, from an engineering change, product obsolescence, or inaccurate component forecasting. Under the agreement, Plexus is to beprocure ~~consumed~~raw ~~within~~materials and begin manufacturing of products in accordance with the ~~next~~Company’s 12forecasts. ~~months~~If ~~were~~certain ~~reflected~~purchased raw materials or certain work-in-process items are held for greater than 90 days, the ~~consolidated~~Company ~~balance~~must ~~sheet~~make asdeposits ~~current~~on ~~assets~~the ~~within~~aging ~~inventories~~inventory, although Plexus must make efforts to minimize the Company’s liability for the aging inventory, including returning materials to suppliers, canceling orders with suppliers, or using materials to manufacture product for its other customers. ~~These~~If raw material or in-process inventories ~~should~~are still unused and have been ~~reflected~~held asfor ~~noncurrent~~more than nine months, the Company must take ownership and ~~included~~pay ~~within~~for ~~other~~the ~~assets~~aged inventory. ~~Management~~Alternatively, ~~has~~if ~~corrected~~there ~~this~~is ~~error~~forecasted bydemand ~~reclassifying~~for $1such inventory, the Company must pay a management fee for Plexus to retain such inventory.7 ~~million of~~If the forecasted demand does not materialize the Company must take ownership and pay for such inventory. This activity may increase the Company’s owned inventories. asThe ~~follows:~~term of our agreement with Plexus currently runs to December 31, 2012, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless either party gives notice of intent not to renew, and subject to either party’s right to terminate upon six months notice.

·At ~~Inventories~~June ~~for~~29, ~~fiscal~~2012, ~~year~~the ~~2011~~Company’s ~~originally~~deposit ~~reported~~on ofinventory held by Plexus was $42.7 million, ~~were~~of ~~corrected~~which to $31.03 million had been charged to a reserve for excess inventory. The deposit, including the related reserve, is included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

·The ~~Other~~Company ~~assets~~regularly performs evaluations of inventory for ~~fiscal~~excess ~~year~~and ~~2011~~obsolete ~~originally~~items, ~~reported~~and for lower of $4cost or market valuation.3 ~~million~~These ~~were~~evaluations ~~corrected~~are applied to $6inventory, inventory classified as non-current assets, and the amount of the Company’s deposit on inventory held by Plexus.0 ~~million~~As a result of these evaluations, the Company recorded charges of $628,000 and $247,000, respectively, to cost of revenue in the three months ended June 29, 2012 and June 24, 2011.

~~The~~Page ~~corrections~~10 ~~did~~of ~~not affect the total assets previously reported. In addition, management has corrected the following:~~24

· Long term inventory for fiscal year 2011 previously disclosed in footnote 4 and 5 has been increased from $805,000 to $2.5 million.

· Change in inventories in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended December 24, 2010 originally reported of $(407,000) was corrected to $1.0 million.

· Change in prepaid expenses and other assets in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended December 24, 2010 originally reported of $3.5 million was corrected to $2.1 million.

The corrections did not affect the net cash used in operating activities.

The foregoing corrections are not considered material by management.

Under the Company’s agreement with its primary contract manufacturer, Plexus Corp. (Plexus), the Company maintains a level of control over parts procurement, design, documentation, and selection of approved suppliers. The Company is generally liable for any termination or cancellation of product orders, as well as excess and obsolete material, which can result, for example, from an engineering change, product obsolescence, or inaccurate component forecasting. Under the agreement, Plexus is to procure raw materials and begin manufacturing of products in accordance with the Company’s forecasts. If certain purchased raw materials or certain work-in-process items are held for greater than 90 days, the Company must make deposits on the aging inventory, although Plexus must make efforts to minimize the Company’s liability for the aging inventory, including returning materials to suppliers, canceling orders with suppliers, or using materials to manufacture product for its other customers. If raw material or in-process inventories are still unused and have been held for more than nine months, the Company must take ownership and pay for the aged inventory. Alternatively, if there is forecasted demand for such inventory, the Company must pay a management fee for Plexus to retain such inventory. If the forecasted demand does not materialize the Company must take ownership and pay for such inventory. This activity may increase the Company’s owned inventories. The term of the Company’s agreement with Plexus currently runs to December 31, 2012, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless either party gives notice of intent not to renew, and subject to either party’s right to terminate upon six month’s notice.

At December 30, 2011, the Company’s deposit on inventory held by Plexus was $2.7 million, of which $1.2 million had been charged to a reserve for excess inventory. The deposit, including the related reserve, is included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company regularly evaluates its inventory for lower of cost or market valuation, including inventory held by Plexus and the amount on deposit with Plexus as well as inventory classified as non-current assets. If the Company believes that demand no longer allows it to sell its inventory above cost, or at all, then the Company writes down that inventory to market or writes off excess inventory. As a result of these evaluations, the Company recorded charges of $359,000 and $686,000, respectively, to cost of revenue in the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011 and $53,000 and $386,000, respectively, for the comparable periods ended December 24, 2010.

Index

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Continued)

Note 4.

Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:

(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Three Months Ended						~~Nine Months Ended~~
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(86,~~364~~005	)	$	(78,~~822~~420	)	$	~~(24,319~~	)	$	~~(19,426~~	)
Denominator-weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share		30,~~483~~573			2930,~~848~~316			~~30,374~~			~~29,814~~
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.2720	)	$	(0.2628	)	$	~~(0.80~~	)	$	~~(0.65~~	)

The denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share is the weighted average number of unrestricted common shares outstanding for the periods presented. In periods of net income, the denominator for diluted net income per share also includes potentially dilutive shares, which consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of dilutive stock options and contingently issuable shares. These shares are excluded from the computations of diluted net loss per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~December~~June 24, ~~2010~~2011 as they are anti-dilutive and would therefore reduce the loss per share. The total amount of such anti-dilutive shares was 9255,000 and ~~117~~132,000, ~~respectively,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~181,000~~June ~~and 212~~24,~~000,~~ ~~respectively~~2011, ~~for the comparable periods ended December 24, 2010~~respectively.

At ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012, there ~~were~~are 770,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the 3¾% convertible senior notes and 753,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the 7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures. For all periods presented, these shares and the related effect of the accrued interest are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Note 5. ~~Restructure~~ ~~and~~Warranty ~~Other Costs~~Accruals

~~There~~The ~~were~~warranty noaccrual, ~~charges~~which ~~for~~is ~~restructuring~~included ~~costs~~in accrued liabilities in the ~~three~~accompanying ~~and~~consolidated ~~nine~~balance ~~months~~sheets, ~~ended~~was ~~December~~$174,000 30at June 29, ~~2011.~~2012, ~~Restructuring~~as ~~costs~~shown ofin ~~$297,000~~the ~~for~~table below. Components of the ~~three~~warranty accrual and ~~nine~~changes in accrued amounts related to the warranty accrual during the three months ended ~~December~~June 2429, ~~2010~~2012 ~~related~~and toJune ~~net~~24, ~~charges~~2011 ~~for~~were ~~employee~~as ~~separation costs.~~follows:

Changes in accrued amounts related to restructuring during fiscal 2012 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(in thousands)	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Balance at beginning of period	$	232		$	85
Charges to costs of revenue		25			29
Charges to warranty accrual		(55	)		(64	)
Other adjustments (1)		(28	)		53
Balance at end of period	$	174		$	103

(in thousands)		Restructure Accrual
Balance at March 25, 2011	$	915
Payments		(948	)
Other (1)		33
Balance at December 30, 2011	$	—

(1)

Adjustments resulted from changes in warranty cost estimates, relating primarily to hourly costs of labor to repair products and frequency of warranty claims.

~~(1)~~Page ~~Consists~~11 ~~primarily~~ of accretion of implied interest on the remaining liability for lease and other exit costs associated with the Company’s former manufacturing facility which is reflected in general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. As the lease term for the Company’s former manufacturing facility ended in December 2011, there is no remaining liability related to that facility at December 30, 2011.24

In January 2012, the Company implemented a workforce reduction as part of an effort to bring the Company’s operating expenses more in line with revenues and preserve capital resources. See Note 11.

Note 6. Income Taxes

The Company recorded tax provisions of $57,000 and $276,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011 and $33,000 and $238,000, respectively, for the comparable periods ended December 24, 2010. Provisions for income tax are primarily related to the Company’s international operations.

Index

~~NETWORK~~Note ~~EQUIPMENT~~6. ~~TECHNOLOGIES,~~Restructure ~~INC.~~and Other Costs

~~Notes~~Restructuring costs for the three months ended June 29, 2012 reflected net charges for employee separation costs related to ~~Condensed~~corporate ~~Consolidated~~restructuring ~~Financial~~activities ~~Statements~~and facility exit costs. There were no restructuring costs for the three months ended June 24, 2011.

~~(Continued)~~In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company announced implementation of a restructuring plan to reduce operating expenses, and preserve capital resources. The combined total of restructure and other cost of $1.5 million recognized in fiscal 2012 and in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 represents the total expected cost of the fiscal 2012 restructuring plan and consists principally of costs relating to severance and termination benefits. The Company anticipates payments of amounts relating to the fiscal 2012 restructuring will be substantially completed by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2013.

~~Note~~The ~~7. Contractual~~liability ~~Obligations~~for restructuring was $70,000 at June 29, 2012 and ~~Commercial~~consisted ~~Contingencies~~solely of accrued costs relating to employee separations. Changes in accrued amounts related to restructuring during fiscal 2013 were as follows:

3¾% Convertible Senior Notes: In December 2007, the Company issued $85.0 million of 3¾% convertible senior notes due December 15, 2014, in a private placement, of which $10.5 million remained outstanding at December 30, 2011. A note may be converted by a holder, at its option, into shares of the Company’s common stock initially at a conversion rate of 73.3689 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $13.63 per share of common stock (subject to adjustment in certain events), at any time on or prior to December 15, 2014, unless the notes were previously repurchased. If a holder elects to convert its notes in connection with certain fundamental changes, in certain circumstances the conversion rate will increase by a number of additional shares of common stock upon conversion. Upon conversion, a holder generally will not receive any cash payment representing accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The notes are not redeemable by the Company prior to the stated maturity.

(in thousands)	Restructure Accrual
Balance at March 30, 2012	$	837
Provision		121
Payments		(790	)
Other(1)		(98	)
Balance at June 29, 2012	$	70

~~Upon~~(1) ~~the~~Consists ~~occurrence~~primarily of ~~certain~~adjustments ~~fundamental~~to ~~changes~~employee ~~including,~~separation ~~without~~costs ~~limitation,~~and anfacility ~~acquisition~~exit ofcosts ~~voting~~which ~~control~~are ofreflected ~~the~~in ~~Company,~~general ~~the~~and ~~liquidation~~administrative orexpense ~~dissolution~~in of the ~~Company,~~condensed orconsolidated ~~the~~statement ~~Company’s common stock ceasing to be traded on a U.S. national securities exchange, a holder may require the Company to purchase for cash all or any part~~ of ~~its~~operations ~~notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus any accrued~~ and ~~unpaid~~comprehensive ~~interest (including additional interest, if any) up until, but not including, the fundamental change date~~loss.

~~The~~Note notes are unsecured senior obligations, ranking equal in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness, and senior in right of payment to any existing and future subordinated indebtedness7. ~~The~~Income notes are effectively subordinated to existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing such indebtedness and structurally subordinated to the claims of all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.Taxes

~~7¼%~~The ~~Redeemable Convertible Subordinated Debentures: In May 1989, the~~ Company ~~issued~~recorded ~~$75.0~~tax ~~million~~provisions of ~~7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures due May 15, 2014, of which~~ $~~23.7 million remained outstanding at December 30~~38,000 ~~2011. Each debenture is convertible at the option of the holder into common stock at $31.50 per share~~ and ~~is redeemable at the option of the Company. The debenture holders are entitled to a sinking fund which began May 15~~$72,000 ~~2000~~respectively, offor ~~14 annual payments of 5% of~~ the ~~aggregate~~three ~~principal~~months ~~amount~~ended ofJune ~~debentures issued ($3.8 million annually)~~29, ~~reduced~~2012 byand ~~any~~June ~~redemption or conversion of the debentures. As a result of previous redemptions~~24, ~~the total remaining sinking fund requirement is $1~~2011.2 ~~million,~~Provisions ~~which,~~for ~~assuming~~income notax ~~further~~are ~~redemptions,~~primarily ~~will~~related beto ~~due~~the asCompany’s ainternational ~~final sinking fund payment on May 15, 2013~~operations.

~~License~~Note and Development Agreement: The Company is a party to a license and development agreement with a third-party technology supplier, under which the Company acquired a license to manufacture and distribute the supplier’s high-speed networking platform8. ~~The~~Contractual ~~Company~~Obligations ~~agreed to pay an additional $5.0 million in four equal installments to the supplier for the advanced platform~~ and anCommercial extended exclusive right to market. The first two installments were paid in fiscal 2008 and the Company does not believe that the remaining two installments, which were to be due upon delivery of future enhancements, will ever become due.Contingencies

~~Unearned~~3¾% ~~income~~Convertible Senior Notes: ~~Deferred~~In ~~revenue~~December 2007, ~~relating~~the toCompany ~~both~~issued ~~product~~$85.0 ~~and~~million ~~service~~of ~~revenues~~3¾% convertible senior notes (the “2007 Notes”) due December 15, ~~was~~2014, in a private placement, of which $410.15 million remained outstanding at ~~December~~June 3024, 2011. A 2007 Note may be converted by a holder, at its option, into shares of the Company’s common stock initially at a conversion rate of 73.3689 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $13.63 per share of common stock (subject to adjustment in certain events), at any time on or prior to December 15, 2014, unless the 2007 Notes were previously repurchased. If a holder elects to convert its 2007 Notes in connection with certain fundamental changes, in certain circumstances the conversion rate will increase by a number of additional shares of common stock upon conversion. Upon conversion, a holder generally will not receive any cash payment representing accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The 2007 Notes are not redeemable by the Company prior to the stated maturity.

~~Contingencies: In~~Upon the ~~normal~~occurrence ~~course~~of certain fundamental changes including, without limitation, an acquisition of ~~business~~voting control of the Company, the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, ~~enters~~or ~~into~~the ~~contractual~~Company’s ~~commitments~~common stock ceasing to be traded on a U.S. national securities exchange, a holder may require the Company to purchase ~~services~~for cash all or any part of its 2007 Notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, ~~materials~~if any) up until, ~~components~~but not including, ~~and~~the ~~finished~~fundamental ~~goods~~change ~~from~~purchase ~~suppliers~~date. The 2007 Notes are unsecured senior obligations, ~~mainly~~ranking ~~its~~equal ~~primary~~in ~~contract~~right ~~manufacturer~~of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness, ~~Plexus~~and senior in right of payment to any existing and future subordinated indebtedness. ~~Under~~The 2007 Notes are effectively subordinated to existing and future secured indebtedness to the ~~agreement~~extent ~~with~~of ~~Plexus,~~the assets securing such indebtedness and structurally subordinated to the ~~Company~~claims ~~may~~of ~~incur~~all ~~certain~~existing ~~liabilities,~~and asfuture ~~described~~indebtedness inand ~~Note~~other 3liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.

~~Contractual~~The ~~obligations~~consummation ~~and~~of ~~contingencies~~the ~~decreased~~Merger ~~from~~will ~~$52~~constitute a “fundamental change” under the 2007 Indenture.5 ~~million~~As atrequired ~~March~~by 25the 2007 Indenture and as provided in the merger agreement, ~~2011~~within 10 business days after the closing date of the Merger, Sonus will deliver, or cause to ~~$47.3~~be ~~million~~delivered, a fundamental change notice to each holder of 2007 Notes indicating that each such holder has the right to have all or a portion of its 2007 Notes purchased at ~~December~~a 30price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2007 Notes (or portion thereof), ~~2011~~plus any accrued and unpaid interest. ~~This~~Any ~~decrease~~2007 ~~resulted~~Notes ~~principally~~tendered asfor purchase in response to the fundamental change notice will be purchased on a ~~result~~date ofto ~~ongoing~~be ~~interest~~selected ~~and~~by ~~operating~~Sonus ~~lease~~that ~~payments~~shall be no later than 35 business days after the date of the fundamental change notice.

In ~~2010,~~accordance ~~the~~with ~~Company learned that some of its products may have been exported or re-exported in violation of U.S. export laws. Consequently,~~ the ~~Company~~2007 ~~performed an internal investigation of its export-related activities~~Indenture, ~~which~~on ~~was~~August ~~conducted by outside counsel. Early in fiscal 2011~~3, 2012 the Company notified ~~reported a limited portion of~~ the ~~matter,~~registered ~~regarding~~holders ~~export~~ of ~~encryption items that may have required an export license prior to shipment, to~~ the ~~U.S.~~2007 ~~Department~~Notes of ~~Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security (“BIS”). That portion has been closed with~~ the ~~issuance~~proposed ~~of a warning letter and no penalty. In September 2011~~Merger, the ~~Company~~supplemental ~~reported~~indenture ~~the results of the rest of the internal investigation~~ to BIS and to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). The disclosure relates to (i) a number of Tenor gateways that were sold to foreign distributors or resellers in non-sanctioned countries and subsequently came within the possession of persons located in sanctioned countries, (ii) related technical support, and (iii) certain e-mail referrals. These transactions all relate to the Quintum Tenor product line and largely relate to activity that occurred prior to NET’s December 2007 acquisition of Quintum. If the U.S. government finds the Company has violated one or more export control laws or trade sanctions, the Company could be ~~subject~~entered tointo ~~various penalties. By statute, these penalties can include but are not limited to fines of up to $250,000 for each violation, denial of export privileges, and debarment from participation~~ in ~~U.S. government~~connection ~~contracts. The Company believes, however, that its cooperation~~ with the ~~U.S. government~~Merger, ~~its immediate attention to rectifying the issues,~~ and ~~other factors provide a basis for mitigating any penalty that might be imposed. Although it is reasonably possible~~ the ~~Company~~anticipated ~~could~~fundamental ~~incur~~change anotice ~~loss as a result of penalties relating~~ to ~~these events, the Company cannot at this time determine an estimated cost, if any, or range of costs, for any such penalties or fines that may~~ be ~~incurred~~delivered ~~upon~~by ~~resolution of this matter~~Sonus. ~~Accordingly, the Company has not made a provision for this matter.~~

Page 12 of 24

Index

~~NETWORK~~7¼% ~~EQUIPMENT~~Redeemable ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~Convertible Subordinated Debentures: In May 1989, ~~INC~~the Company issued $75.0 million of 7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures due May 15, 2014 (the “1989 Debentures”), of which $23.7 million remained outstanding at June 24, 2011. Each 1989 Debenture is convertible at the option of the holder into common stock at $31.50 per share and is redeemable at the option of the Company. The 1989 Debenture holders are entitled to a sinking fund which began May 15, 2000, of 14 annual payments of 5% of the aggregate principal amount of 1989 Debentures issued ($3.8 million annually), reduced by any redemption or conversion of the 1989 Debentures. As a result of previous redemptions, the total remaining sinking fund requirement is $1.2 million, which, assuming no further redemptions, will be due as a final sinking fund payment on May 15, 2013.

~~Notes~~In accordance with the 1989 Indenture, on August 3, 2012 the Company notified the registered holders of the 1989 Debentures of the proposed Merger and the supplemental indenture to ~~Condensed~~be ~~Consolidated~~entered ~~Financial~~into ~~Statements~~in connection with the Merger.

~~(Continued)~~License and Development Agreement: The Company is a party to a license and development agreement with a third-party technology supplier, under which the Company acquired a license to manufacture and distribute the supplier’s high-speed networking platform. The Company agreed to pay an additional $5.0 million in four equal installments to the supplier for the advanced platform and an extended exclusive right to market. The first two installments were paid in fiscal 2008 and the remaining two will be due at separate future dates dependent upon the supplier’s delivery of future enhancements of the advanced platform. The Company believes it is unlikely the remaining two installments will become due or be paid.

~~Litigation~~Unearned income: ~~See~~ Deferred ~~Note~~revenue, 10relating to both product and service revenues, was $3.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively at June 29, 2012 and March 30, 2012.

~~Note~~Contingencies: In 8the normal course of business, the Company enters into contractual commitments to purchase services, materials, components, and finished goods from suppliers, mainly its primary contract manufacturer, Plexus. ~~Stock-based~~ ~~Compensation~~Under the agreement with Plexus, the Company may incur certain liabilities, as described in Note 3.

Contractual obligations and contingencies decreased from $46.7 million at March 30, 2012 to $45.1 million at June 29, 2012. This decrease resulted principally as a result of ongoing interest and operating lease payments.

Note 9.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock Option and Award Plans: The Company grants options to purchase shares of its common stock and is authorized to award restricted shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of its 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, its 1993 Stock Option Plan and its 1997 Stock Option Program. Upon stockholder approval of the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan in August 2008, the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Stock Option Program were terminated, and all shares available for future grants of awards under the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Stock Option Program were terminated.

Stock options generally become exercisable ratably over a four-year period and expire after seven to ten years. Options may be granted to officers, employees, directors and independent contractors to purchase common stock at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value at the date of grant. There were no stock option ~~exercises~~grants inor ~~the~~stock ~~three and nine months ended December 30, 2011. Stock~~ option exercises ~~were none and 10,041 shares, respectively,~~ in the ~~comparable~~three ~~periods~~months ended ~~December~~June 2429, ~~2010~~2012.

Restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) granted under the equity plans are independent of option grants and are subject to restrictions. RSAs, which have been issued since fiscal 2007, are subject to forfeiture if employment or services are terminated prior to the release of restrictions, which generally occurs on a ratable basis over one to two years from the date of grant. Until the restriction is released, the shares cannot be transferred. These shares ~~are~~have ~~considered~~the assame ~~issued~~cash dividend and ~~outstanding~~voting atrights ~~the time of grant,~~ as ~~the~~other common stock ~~award~~and ~~holders~~ are ~~entitled~~considered toas ~~many~~issued ~~of the rights of a stockholder, including cash dividend~~ and ~~voting rights~~outstanding. The cost of the awards, determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, is expensed ratably over the period the restrictions lapse.

Restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”) granted under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan are also independent of option grants and are subject to restrictions. RSUs are subject to forfeiture if employment or services are terminated prior to the release of restrictions, which generally occurs on a ratable basis over periods ranging from one day to two years from the date of grant. Until the restriction is released, the shares cannot be transferred. These shares are not considered as issued and outstanding until the release of restrictions. The cost of the awards, determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, is expensed ratably over the period the restrictions lapse.

Upon the release of restriction, a portion of the released shares are repurchased from employees by the Company to satisfy withholding-tax obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock awards. The Company repurchased 2921,~~803~~232 shares from employees in the three months ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 for a total price of $6021,000. ~~For the nine months ended December 30, 2011, the Company repurchased 101,129 shares from employees for a total price of $251,000.~~

~~Stock~~Page ~~Compensation~~13 ~~Expense:~~of ~~Stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011 and December~~ 24~~, 2010, was as follows:~~

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	December 30, 2011		December 24, 2010		December 30, 2011		December 24, 2010
Cost of revenue	$	133	$	220	$	398	$	622
Sales and marketing		179		473		623		1,270
Research and development		230		562		846		1,566
General and administrative		172		336		587		1,046
	$	714	$	1,591	$	2,454	$	4,504

Index

~~NETWORK~~Stock ~~EQUIPMENT~~Compensation ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~Expense: Stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 29, ~~INC.~~2012 and June 24, 2011, was as follows:

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	June 29, 2012		June 24, 2011
Cost of revenue	$	135	$	125
Sales and marketing		177		227
Research and development		217		317
General and administrative		174		214
	$	703	$	883

~~(Continued)~~Note 10. Financial Instruments Fair Value Disclosure

The estimated fair ~~value~~values of the Company’s ~~stock~~financial ~~option~~instruments ~~awards~~at ~~granted~~June to29, ~~employees~~2012 ~~was~~and ~~estimated~~March ~~using~~30, ~~the~~2012 ~~following~~were ~~weighted-average~~as ~~assumptions~~follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)	June 29, 2012						March 30, 2012
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
	Carrying Amount			Estimated Fair Value			Carrying Amount			Estimated Fair Value
Expected term, in years		4.97			4.94			4.97			4.94
Assets:
Expected volatility		79.67	%		75.99	%		77.68	%		73.31	%
Short-term investments	$	22,383		$	22,383		$	26,245		$	26,245
Risk-free interest rate		0.83	%		2.09	%		1.07	%		1.80	%
Liabilities:
Expected dividends		—			—			—			—
3¾% Convertible senior notes	$	10,500		$	2,560		$	10,500		$	1,537
Weighted-average fair value	$	1.20		$	2.28		$	1.61		$	2.73
7¼% Redeemable convertible subordinated debentures	$	23,704		$	11,852		$	23,704		$	8,178

AtThe ~~December~~gross ~~30,~~unrealized ~~2011,~~holding ~~the~~gains ~~total~~(losses) ~~compensation~~on ~~cost related to unvested stock~~available-~~based~~for-sale ~~awards~~securities ~~not~~for ~~yet~~short ~~recognized,~~term ~~net~~investments ofrecorded ~~estimated~~in ~~forfeitures,~~accumulated ~~was~~other ~~approximately~~comprehensive ~~$3.5~~loss ~~million,~~were ~~which~~not ~~will~~material beas ~~adjusted~~of ~~for~~June ~~subsequent~~29, ~~changes~~2012 inand ~~estimated~~March ~~forfeitures.~~30, ~~The~~2012 ~~weighted-average period during which the cost will be amortized was approximately 2~~respectively.~~0 years.~~

Note 9. Financial Instruments Fair Value Disclosure

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 30, 2011 and March 25, 2011 were as follows:

(in thousands)	December 30, 2011				March 25, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Assets:
Short-term investments	$	31,104	$	31,104	$	56,860	$	56,860
Liabilities:
3¾% Convertible senior notes	$	10,500	$	5,490	$	10,500	$	8,709
7¼% Redeemable convertible subordinated debentures	$	23,704	$	15,955	$	23,704	$	21,334

The gross unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities for short term investments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss were not material as of December 30, 2011 and March 25, 2011 respectively.

The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair values of financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximate their estimated fair values due to their short maturities.

Short-term investments: Fair values are based on quoted market prices and observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. See Note 2.

Restricted cash: The carrying value approximates fair value.

Accounts receivable: The carrying value approximates fair value.

Accounts payable: The carrying value approximates fair value.

Accrued liabilities: The carrying value approximates fair value.

Convertible debt: The Company has estimated the approximate fair value of these securities using ~~the~~ quoted market ~~price~~prices or ~~trade~~trades closest to ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012. The Company has determined that its convertible debt should be classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. ~~See~~(see Note 2).

~~Foreign~~Page ~~exchange~~14 contracts: The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. At times, the Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain balance sheet exposures and intercompany balances against future movement in foreign exchange rates. Gains and losses on the foreign exchange contracts are included in other income and expense, net, which offset foreign exchange gains or losses from revaluation of ~~foreign currency-denominated balance sheet items and intercompany balances.~~24

The foreign exchange forward contracts require the Company to exchange foreign currencies to U.S. dollars or vice versa, and generally mature in one month or less. As of December 30, 2011, the Company had no outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts. As of March 25, 2011, the Company had outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts with aggregate notional amounts of $5.9 million, which had remaining maturities of one month or less. The amounts recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations for foreign exchange contracts are not material.

Index

~~NETWORK~~Note ~~EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC~~11. Litigation

~~Notes~~On June 21, 2012, a purported shareholder of the Company filed a class action complaint against the Company, our directors and an executive officer of the Company, Sonus and Sonus Merger Subsidiary in connection with the proposed merger. The action is captioned Bruno v. Network Equipment Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 7643, and is pending in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. On July 10, 2012, a purported shareholder of the company filed a class action complaint against our company, our directors, Sonus and Sonus Merger Subsidiary in connection with the proposed merger. The action is captioned Rogers v. Keating, et al., Case No. RG12638516, and is pending in the Superior Court of California for Alameda County. The Bruno and Rogers complaints allege that the defendants breached and/or aided and abetted the breach of their fiduciary duties to ~~Condensed~~our ~~Consolidated~~shareholders, ~~Financial~~by ~~Statements~~seeking to sell the company through an allegedly unfair process and allegedly for an unfair price and on unfair terms. The complaints seek, among other things, equitable relief that would enjoin the merger, damages, and attorney’s fees and costs. As is common in this type of litigation, additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations concerning the proposed merger may be filed in the future, in the same or other courts. The Company believes the complaints’ allegations have no merit, and intends to defend against them vigorously. However, all litigation is inherently uncertain, and there can be no assurance that the Company’s defense of these or similar actions will be successful. The Company has not accrued any amounts related to these complaints, as it believes that a negative outcome is not probable.

A subsidiary of the Company, Quintum Technologies, LLC (~~Continued~~Quintum), was party, by interpleader, to three related lawsuits in Greece filed by Lexis SA, a former distributor of Quintum products in Greece. The underlying lawsuits, the first of which was filed in 2006, were cancelled due to the fact that the originating plaintiffs waived their rights against Lexis. Since a negative outcome is therefore not probable, the Company has not accrued any amounts related to this matter. As Lexis has not yet formally waived its rights against Quintum, hearings on the matter between Lexis and Quintum remain on calendar and are scheduled for January 2015, but the Company believes the scheduled hearings may not ever occur.

~~Note~~The 10Company is the subject of a complaint filed on June 7, 2012, by AIM-IP LLC in the U. ~~Litigation~~S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleges infringement of a patent relating to the G.729 audio data compression algorithm. The Company believes that it has various defenses to the complaint, although legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur. The Company has not accrued an amount relating to this matter as the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated.

A subsidiary of the Company, Quintum Technologies, LLC (Quintum), is party, by interpleader, to three related lawsuits in Greece filed by Lexis SA, a former distributor of Quintum products in Greece. The initial interpleader lawsuit was filed October 26, 2006, at the Multimember First Instance Court of Athens. The first two of these lawsuits were initially filed against Lexis by one of its customers, Advanced Telecom Systems (“ATS”), alleging that a set of hardware and software products acquired for ATS by Lexis failed to perform as a system. The products include Quintum’s hardware product and a software product by another vendor, Ipercom. In ~~these~~addition ~~first two lawsuits, the customer (ATS) seeks damages from the distributor (Lexis), and the distributor has interpleaded the product vendors, Quintum and Ipercom, asking them~~ to ~~pay any amounts that Lexis may be ordered to pay to ATS, who seeks a refund of amounts paid for~~ the ~~purchase of the hardware and software~~above, totaling €78,215, and compensation for real and moral damages, totaling €3,480,309. The third lawsuit was initiated by one of ATS’s customers for non delivery of services, which were to be delivered through the ~~system~~Company ~~ATS~~is ~~purchased~~involved ~~from~~in ~~Lexis. In this lawsuit, the ATS customer seeks~~ various ~~monetary~~legal ~~damages~~proceedings ~~totaling~~from ~~€2,859,847.~~time ~~ATS filed an interpleader lawsuit against Lexis and Lexis has filed the same against Quintum and Ipercom. Hearings on all the lawsuits and interpleader lawsuits are currently scheduled~~ to ~~occur~~time in ~~early 2015. The Company believes that no reasonable estimate of~~ the ~~possible~~normal ~~loss~~course ~~or range~~ of ~~loss~~its can be made as (i) the claims stated in the lawsuits are vague, (ii) the claims as to the responsibility of Quintum do not seem to be founded on a proper substantive basis, (iii) the damages claimed by the plaintiff include moral damages and monetary penalties, which are rarely awarded by the Greek courts without restriction on the amounts of such awards, and (iv) the Company was interpleaded into the lawsuit by other primary defendants such that any potential liability might be apportioned among multiple defendantsbusiness. Accordingly, the Company is unable to provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss, other than the amounts claimed, which total €6,418,372. Any awarded sum would bear interest from the date the lawsuits were served, which was February 12, 2009. As no reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss can be made, the Company has not accrued any amounts related to the claim.

In addition to the above, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings from time to time in the normal course of business. As of December 30, 2011, the Company has made no accruals relating to legal contingencies.

Note 11. Subsequent Event

On January 5, 2012 the Company implemented a workforce reduction as part of an effort to bring the Company’s operating expenses more in line with revenues and preserve capital resources.

In connection with this workforce reduction, the Company estimates that it will incur charges in an amount not to exceed $1.0 million (in cash expenditures) for severance and termination benefits for affected employees, who represented approximately 15% of the existing workforce. Substantially all of this amount will be incurred in the Company’s fiscal fourth quarter, which ends March 30, 2012.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q and Part II of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2530, ~~2011~~2012 (as amended). Statements contained in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that relate to future events or our future financial performance. A forward-looking statement may contain words such as “plans,” “hopes,” “believes,” “estimates,” “will,” “continue to,” “expect to,” “anticipate that,” “to be,” or “can affect.” Forward-looking statements are based upon management expectations, forecasts and assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Many factors may cause actual results to vary including, but not limited to, the factors discussed in this Form 10-Q and our most recently filed Form 10-K (as amended). The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to revise or publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained in this Form 10-Q except as required by law. Investors should carefully review any risk factors described in this Form 10-Q and our most recently filed Form 10-K (as amended), along with other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

References to “fiscal ~~2012~~2013” or “fiscal ~~2011~~2012” generally refer to the specific periods presented in this discussion.

Merger Agreement with Sonus Inc.

On June 18, 2012, Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (“NET”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Sonus Networks, Inc. (“Sonus”), and Navy Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sonus (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into NET and NET will become a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sonus (the “Merger”). See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our Business

Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (“NET”), founded in 1983, develops and sells high performance networking equipment optimized for real-time communications. For more than a quarter of a century, NET has delivered solutions for multi-service networks requiring high degrees of versatility, security and performance. Today, the company is focused on providing secure real-time communications for unified communications (“UC”), session-initiation protocol (“SIP”) trunking, enterprise mobility, and IP-based multi-service networking. In 2007, in order to enhance our lineup of voice over IP (“VoIP”) offerings, we acquired Quintum Technologies and its Tenor product line.

Our enterprise customer base includes large enterprises adopting UC and small- to mid-sized businesses (“SMBs”) implementing real-time communications. Our government customers include a variety of federal and international agencies and organizations, including civilian and defense agencies and resellers to such entities. In addition to our direct sales capabilities, we have developed relationships with integrators, resellers, and vendors of related technologies in order to help drive our enterprise business. Our global support and service organization, along with third-party service organizations, provides installation and other professional services, a variety of maintenance programs, technical assistance, and customer training.

~~Today,~~Page ~~our~~15 solutions are focused on enabling our enterprise and government customers to cost-effectively migrate to next-generation IP networks utilizing real-time communications, including unified communications platforms, cloud-based voice, secure voice applications, and high-speed multiservice wide area networking (“WAN”) transport networks. Our newest product offering, the UX Series, was purpose-built for the unified communications and enterprise “session border controller” markets to enable adoption of new communication technologies and services. Although sales of the UX Series product line to date still comprise but a small amount of our overall sales, we continue to expand the suite of UX Series products. Our voice solutions include the VX Series and the Tenor lines of switching media gateways. Our legacy multi-service solutions include the Promina platform and the NX Series high speed multi-service network exchange platform.24

The UX Series is an enhanced gateway with an embedded server that acts a survivable branch appliance, which is a key component for remote-site survivability. The UX Series interoperates with our VX Series and Tenor products and was specifically designed to support upstream deployments with advanced features that give customers high levels of flexibility, scalability, quality of experience, and investment protection through interoperability. The VX Series and Tenor product lines provide enterprise customers with voice interoperability solutions that enable existing private branch exchange (“PBX”) and IP-PBX systems to work together with new UC platforms and IP-based service provider networks offering SIP trunking services. The VX Series also provides IP-based solutions to government agencies requiring high bandwidth efficiency and call performance for secure voice communications. The Tenor product line also provides traditional VoIP switching gateway solutions for SMBs and smaller branch offices within large enterprises.

Our legacy multi-service solutions include the Promina, NX1000 and NX5010 platforms. The Promina product line has been serving government agencies and large enterprises for many years, providing industry-leading network reliability and security. The NX Series products are high-performance networking platforms that provide high-grade data transfer and enable secure grid computing. Our NX1000 platform provides an extensive, compact, WAN switching solution that enables applications to integrate and aggregate into IP-based networks. The NX5010 platform enables high-speed, secure interconnection and extension of geographically distributed grid computing clusters and storage area networks.

Index

Today, our solutions are focused on enabling our enterprise and government customers to cost-effectively migrate to next-generation IP networks utilizing real-time communications, including unified communications platforms, cloud-based voice, secure voice applications, and high-speed multiservice wide area networking (WAN) transport networks. Our newest product offering, the UX Series, was purpose-built for the unified communications and enterprise session border controller (E-SBC) markets to enable adoption of new communication technologies and services. Our voice solutions include the VX Series and the Tenor product lines of switching media gateways. Our legacy multi-service solutions include the Promina platform and the NX Series high speed multi-service network exchange platform.

The UX Series is an enhanced gateway with an embedded server that acts as a survivable branch appliance (SBA), which is a key component for remote-site survivability. The UX Series interoperates with our VX Series and Tenor products and was specifically designed to support upstream deployments with advanced features that give customers high levels of flexibility, scalability, quality of experience, and investment protection through interoperability. The VX Series and Tenor product lines provide enterprise customers with voice interoperability solutions that enable existing private branch exchange (PBX) and IP-PBX systems to work together with new UC platforms and IP-based service provider networks offering SIP trunking services. The VX Series also provides IP-based solutions to government agencies requiring high bandwidth efficiency and call performance for secure voice communications. The Tenor product line also provides traditional VoIP switching gateway solutions for SMBs and smaller branch offices within large enterprises.

Our legacy multi-service solutions include the Promina, NX1000 and NX5010 platforms. The Promina product line has been serving government agencies and large enterprises for many years, providing industry-leading network reliability and security. The NX Series products are high-performance networking platforms that provide high-grade data transfer and enable secure grid computing. Our NX1000 platform provides an extensive, compact, wide-area network (WAN) switching solution that enables applications to integrate and aggregate into IP-based networks. The NX5010 platform enables high-speed, secure interconnection and extension of geographically distributed grid computing clusters and SANs.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates and assumptions, which we evaluate on an on-going basis, include, but are not limited to: assumptions related to contracts that have multiple elements, the allowances for sales returns and potentially uncollectible accounts receivable, the valuation of inventory, warranty costs, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, certain reserves and accruals, estimated lives of depreciable assets, and assumptions related to stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

There have been no significant changes to our policies and estimates, as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2530, ~~2011~~2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on our consolidated financial statements.

Page 16 of 24

Index

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth selected data derived from our condensed consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of revenue for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended						~~Nine Months Ended~~
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Percent of revenue
Product		6365.38	%		7568.81	%		~~71.2~~	%		~~78.3~~	%
Service and other		3634.72			2431.29			~~28.8~~			~~21.7~~
Total revenue		100.0			100.0			~~100.0~~			~~100.0~~
Product gross margin		2631.28			4130.65			~~32.1~~			~~48.8~~
Service and other gross margin		5060.32			1941.96			~~44.2~~			~~14.7~~
Total gross margin		3541.15			3634.30			~~35.6~~			~~41.4~~
Sales and marketing		4230.37			3839.25			~~37.0~~			~~31.7~~
Research and development		4131.45			3442.56			~~37.5~~			~~30.4~~
General and administrative		2026.60			1622.0			~~19.1~~			~~17.0~~
Restructure and other costs		—1.1			~~2.1~~—			—			~~0.6~~
Total operating expenses		~~104~~89.3			90104.81			~~93.6~~			~~79.7~~
Loss from operations		(6947.28	)		(5470.51	)		~~(58.0~~	)		~~(38.3~~	)
Interest expense, net		(4.35	)		(24.0	)		~~(3.4~~	)		~~(2.0~~	)
Other income (expense), net		~~(0.7~~—	)		0.53			~~(0.2~~	)		—
Loss before taxes		(7452.23	)		(5673.08	)		~~(61.6~~	)		~~(40.3~~	)
Income tax provision		0.53			0.26			~~0.7~~			~~0.5~~
Net loss		(7452.76	) %		(5674.24	) %		~~(62.3~~	)%		~~(40.8~~	)%

Overview and Highlights

~~Note:~~· ~~Unless~~Total ~~otherwise~~revenue ~~stated,~~increased ~~all~~slightly ~~references~~in tothe ~~“fiscal~~first ~~2012”~~quarter ~~refer~~of tofiscal ~~the~~2013 ~~three~~due ~~and~~to ~~nine~~higher ~~months~~service ~~ended~~revenues. ~~December~~Product 30revenue declined, ~~2011;~~as ~~all~~increased ~~references~~sales to ~~“fiscal~~commercial ~~2011”~~customers orwere ~~“the~~offset ~~prior~~by ~~fiscal~~reduced ~~year”~~sales ~~refer~~ to ~~the~~government ~~comparable~~customers. ~~prior~~Our ~~year~~legacy ~~periods,~~products ~~that~~have ~~is,~~seen ~~the~~sales ~~three~~declines and ~~nine~~our ~~months~~newer ~~ended~~products ~~December~~are ~~24,~~targeted ~~2010;~~for ~~and~~different ~~all~~solutions ~~comparative~~and ~~references,~~will ~~such~~require asmarketing ~~“increases”~~ and ~~“decreases”~~further ordevelopment ~~“higher”~~towards ~~and~~these ~~“lower”,~~new ~~refer~~solutions toin ~~the~~order ~~current~~to ~~fiscal~~achieve ~~2012~~broader ~~period~~adoption asin ~~compared to~~ the ~~comparable~~government ~~fiscal 2011 period~~sector.

●· ~~Total~~We ~~revenue~~are ~~decreased~~transitioning inour ~~fiscal~~product ~~2012~~line ~~due~~to ~~mostly~~address tounified ~~lower~~communications ~~sales~~and toother ~~government~~new ~~customers~~telecommunications opportunities. Sales toof ~~the government sector have declined substantially in recent quarters, as demand for~~ our ~~Promina~~UX ~~and VX~~ Series ~~products~~product, ~~has~~which ~~waned~~was ~~and~~introduced ~~our~~in ~~newest products are not currently targeted to~~ the ~~government.~~third ~~Certain~~quarter ~~features~~of ~~required~~fiscal by2011, ~~the government~~ are ~~not planned for the UX Series until 2013~~increasing, ~~and~~but sales ofhave ~~the~~declined UXfor ~~Series~~our toPromina ~~the~~and ~~government~~other ~~will~~multi-service ~~require~~products, ~~marketing~~as ofwell ~~the~~as ~~product~~ for ~~new~~our ~~solutions~~VoIP-based ~~within~~VX ~~the~~Series ~~government that were not targeted by our prior products~~product.

Our sector mix and our mix of product sales fluctuate quarter to quarter. Our newer products have not achieved broad market acceptance, so large individual sales can have a significant effect on our mix of product sales. Also, spending by government customers fluctuates based on budget allocations, the timely passage of the annual federal budget, and the timing of specific programs and purchasing for those programs. The following table shows elements of our sector mix and our mix of product sales:

Page 17 of 24

Index

● We are transitioning our product line to address unified communications and other new telecommunications opportunities. Sales of our UX Series platform, including the UX1000, which was introduced in the third quarter of fiscal 2012, have been slowly increasing, but not quickly enough to offset the decline in sales of our Promina and other multi-service products and our VoIP-based VX Series product. As noted above, these declines are primarily due to reduced government sales.

(in thousands, except percentages)	Three Months Ended
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Sector mix:
Revenue from government customers	$	4,664		$	5,965
% of total revenue		40.9	%		52.7	%
Revenue from commercial customers	$	6,752		$	5,348
% of total revenue		59.1	%		47.3	%
Mix of product sales:
Promina product revenue	$	1,405		$	1,936
% of product revenue		18.7	%		25.1	%
VoIP-based product revenue	$	5,878		$	4,825
% of product revenue		78.3	%		62.7	%
Other product revenue	$	174		$	863
% of product revenue		2.3	%		11.2	%

●· ~~Our~~Product ~~sector~~margin ~~mix~~ and ~~our~~service ~~mix~~margin ofboth ~~product sales fluctuate quarter to quarter~~increased. ~~Our~~The ~~newer~~increase ~~products~~in ~~have~~product ~~not~~margin ~~achieved~~was ~~broad market acceptance, so large individual sales can have~~ a ~~significant~~result ~~effect on our mix~~ of ~~product~~reduced ~~sales.~~employee ~~Also~~compensation costs, ~~spending~~due byto ~~government~~lower ~~customers~~headcount ~~fluctuates~~and ~~based~~related oncosts ~~budget~~allocated ~~allocations,~~to ~~the~~cost ~~timely passage~~ of ~~the annual federal budget~~products, ~~and~~partially ~~the~~offset ~~timing~~by ofreserve ~~specific~~charges ~~programs and purchasing~~ for ~~those~~legacy ~~programs~~products. InThe ~~the~~increase ~~third~~in ~~quarter,~~service ~~more~~margin ~~than~~was ~~three-fourths~~also ofa ~~our~~result ~~product~~of ~~revenue~~reduced ~~came~~employee ~~from~~compensation ~~our~~costs, ~~next~~due ~~generation~~to ~~switching~~lower ~~platforms~~headcount ~~(the UX Series, VX Series~~ and ~~Tenor~~related ~~products),~~costs ~~which~~allocated ~~are~~to ~~designed~~cost ~~primarily for enterprise customers. The following table shows elements~~ of ~~our sector mix and our mix of product sales:~~service.

(in thousands, except percentages)	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
Sector mix:
Revenue from government customers	$	5,656		$	9,149		$	19,654		$	34,269
% of total revenue		50.5	%		65.7	%		50.5	%		71.9	%
Mix of product sales:
Promina product revenue	$	1,182		$	2,762		$	7,377		$	12,267
% of product revenue		16.7	%		26.2	%		26.6	%		32.9	%
VoIP-based product revenue	$	5,801		$	6,860		$	17,468		$	21,221
% of product revenue		81.8	%		65.0	%		63.0	%		56.9	%
Other product revenue	$	44		$	882		$	2,666		$	3,559
% of product revenue		0.6	%		8.4	%		9.6	%		9.5	%

Expense levels were lower than in prior periods. Operating expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 decreased 13.5% from the prior year, despite substantial expenses for outside services relating the pending acquisition by Sonus. This decrease was achieved largely as a result of reduced employee compensation costs following organizational restructurings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

· Product margin was down as a result of reduced sales and a changing mix of products. With reduced sales, we are unable to take advantage of economies of scale, and have also had to take reserves for excess or obsolete inventory. In addition, we had achieved a higher gross margin on our legacy products, which make up a declining portion of our revenue mix, compared to the gross margin for our more recently introduced products. In part, this is because the more recently introduced products have not yet benefitted from on-going cost reduction efforts or volume purchasing.

· Service margin was up due to higher service revenue and changes in service delivery arrangements. Our arrangement with CACI International Inc. (“CACI”) for the sharing of maintenance and other services expired in December, 2010. We now perform these services ourselves, with a relatively small increase in cost, and no longer have the cost of remitting to CACI any payment based on the revenue associated with these services.

· Expense levels were generally consistent with prior periods. We continue to manage expenses and cash closely. Operating expense in the first nine months of fiscal 2012 decreased 4.1% from the prior year, due largely to reduced charges for our headquarters facility lease. In the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we executed a five-year extension of our headquarters facility lease at rates favorable to those in the original lease. In January 2012 (subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2012), we implemented a workforce reduction as part of an effort to bring the Company’s operating expenses more in line with revenues and preserve capital resources.

Revenue

(in thousands, except percentages)

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

Three Months Ended

December 30, 2011

December 24, 2010

Change

December 30, 2011

December 24, 2010

Change

(in thousands, except percentages)

June 29, 2012

June 24, 2011

Change

Product

7,~~094~~509

107,~~553~~699

(322.85

~~27,744~~

~~37,281~~

~~(25.6~~

Service and other

43,~~112~~907

3,~~368~~614

228.1

~~11,203~~

~~10,351~~

~~8.2~~

Total revenue

11,~~206~~416

1311,~~921~~313

~~(19~~0.59

~~38,947~~

~~47,632~~

~~(18.2~~

~~The~~Total ~~third~~revenue ~~quarter~~increased ofin fiscal ~~2012~~2013, ~~compared~~due to ~~the~~an ~~third~~increase ~~quarter~~in ofservice ~~fiscal~~revenue, ~~2011~~partially offset by a decline in product revenue.

On a sector basis, product revenue from commercial customers increased by $942,000, while product revenue from government customers declined by $1.1 million.

We expect our mix of product sales and our sector mix to fluctuate quarter to quarter, and we expect commercial sales to continue to increase as a percentage of our total sales. Sales to our government customers can fluctuate based upon passage of the annual budget and the timing of specific government programs.

Service and other revenue increased slightly in fiscal 2013, due to increased service activities. Significant fluctuations in our service and other revenue can occur as a result of factors affecting the timing of the recognition of revenue, including customer deployment schedules, contractual acceptance provisions and renewal of annual support agreements.

Page 18 of 24

Index

Total revenue decreased, due to a decline in product revenue, partially offset by higher service and other revenue.

On a sector basis, product revenue from government customers declined $4.2 million, offset in part by a $741,000 increase in sales to commercial customers. On a product-line basis, the decrease in product revenue was mostly due to reduced sales of our Promina and VX Series products, offset somewhat by increased sales of UX series products. Basic VoIP application product sales have remained essentially flat as we shift our focus to more-advanced unified communications, SIP trunking, and other applications supported by our VX Series product and now by our UX Series product.

We expect our mix of product sales and our sector mix to fluctuate quarter to quarter, with commercial sales expected to outpace government sales in fiscal 2012. Sales to our government customers can fluctuate based upon passage of the annual budget and the timing of specific government programs.

Service and other revenue increased, in part due to completion of professional service projects delivered in prior quarters that became billable in the current quarter and in part due to maintenance contracts sold with new products. Fluctuations in our service and other revenue can occur as a result of factors affecting the timing of the recognition of revenue, including customer deployment schedules, contractual acceptance provisions and renewal of annual support agreements.

The nine months ended December 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended December 24, 2010

Total revenue decreased, due to a decline in product revenue, partially offset by higher service and other revenue.

On a sector basis, product revenue from government customers declined $15.3 million, offset in part by a $5.7 million increase in sales to commercial customers. On a product-line basis, the decrease in product revenue was mostly due to reduced sales of our Promina and VX Series products, although international sales of VX Series products were up slightly. Sales of UX series products, which were introduced in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, increased. Basic VoIP application product sales remained essentially flat.

Service and other revenue increased in part due to completion of professional service projects delivered in prior periods that became billable in the current period and in part due to maintenance contracts sold with new products.

Gross Margin

	Three Months Ended						~~Nine Months Ended~~
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Product gross margin		2631.28	%		4130.65	%		~~32.1~~	%		~~48.8~~	%
Service and other gross margin		5060.32			1941.96			~~44.2~~			~~14.7~~
Total gross margin		3541.15	%		3634.30	%		~~35.6~~	%		~~41.4~~	%

~~The~~Total ~~third~~gross ~~quarter~~margin ofincreased in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 ~~compared~~due principally to ~~the~~higher ~~third~~service ~~quarter~~and ofother ~~fiscal 2011~~margin.

~~Total~~Product ~~gross~~ margin ~~decreased~~was slightly ashigher ~~lower~~in ~~product~~fiscal ~~margin~~2013. ~~outweighed~~This ~~improvements~~increase inwas ~~service~~primarily ~~and~~due ~~other~~to ~~margin~~the effect of lower employee compensation costs resulting from the restructurings.

~~Product~~Service ~~margin~~and ~~was~~other down primarily due to a lower amount of product revenues available to absorb manufacturing overhead. In addition, lower sales of Promina products contributed to lower product margin, as Promina products have higher gross margin ~~than~~improved ~~our~~due ~~more~~largely ~~recently~~to ~~introduced~~reduced ~~products,~~employee incompensation ~~part~~and ~~because~~facilities ~~the~~costs ~~more~~resulting ~~recently introduced products have not yet benefitted~~ from ~~on-going cost reduction efforts or volume purchasing. Product margin can also be affected by inventory reserve charges. As part of our arrangement with our principal contract manufacturer,~~ the ~~manufacturer~~restructurings ~~holds significant amounts of raw materials, components~~ and ~~product~~cost ~~inventory~~savings onresulting ~~our~~from ~~behalf.~~closures Under certain circumstances, we may be required to make deposits on the inventory, and if the inventory continues to remain on hand, to purchase the inventory underlying the deposit. We may subsequently need to write down or write off the inventory. Inventory reserve charges for the third quarters of ~~fiscal~~service ~~2012 and fiscal 2011 were $359,000 and $53,000, respectively~~facilities. ~~The increase in inventory reserve charges in fiscal 2012 is attributable to charges for our Promina products.~~

Service and other gross margin improved due largely to the termination of the revenue sharing arrangement with our former service partner, CACI, in December 2010. We now perform these services ourselves, with a relatively small increase in cost, and no longer have the cost of remitting to CACI any payment based on the revenue associated with these services. This cost reduction was partially offset by relatively small increases in costs relating to an expansion of our support staff, through increased headcount and by re-assigning some existing personnel from our sales organization.

The nine months ended December 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended December 24, 2010

Total gross margin decreased as lower product margin outweighed improvements in service and other margin.

Product margin was down primarily due to a lower amount of product revenues available to absorb manufacturing overhead.

Index

In addition, lower sales of Promina products contributed to lower product margin, as Promina products have higher gross margin than our more recently introduced products. Product margin can also be affected by inventory reserve charges which for the nine months ended December 30, 2011 and December 24, 2010 were $686,000 and $386,000, respectively. The increase in inventory reserve charges in fiscal 2012 is attributable to charges for our Promina products.

Service and other gross margin improved due largely to the termination of the revenue sharing arrangement with our former service partner, CACI, in December 2010.

Operating Expenses

(in thousands, except percentages)	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended
	Three Months Ended
	December 30, 2011		December 24, 2010		Change			December 30, 2011		December 24, 2010		Change
(in thousands, except percentages)	June 29, 2012		June 24, 2011		Change
Sales and marketing	$	43,~~736~~501	$	54,~~320~~464		(1121.06	)%	$	~~14,408~~	$	~~15,076~~		~~(4.4~~	)%
Research and development		43,~~640~~601		4,~~803~~821		(325.43	)		~~14,597~~		~~14,457~~		~~1.0~~
General and administrative		2,~~305~~972		2,~~237~~498		319.0			~~7,426~~		~~8,149~~		~~(8.9~~	)
Restructure and other costs		—		297		(100.0	)		—		297		(100.0	)
Restructure costs		121		—		100.0
Total operating expenses	$	1110,~~681~~195	$	1211,~~657~~783		(713.75	)%	$	~~36,431~~	$	~~37,979~~		~~(4.1~~	)%

~~Total~~Operating ~~operating~~expense ~~expenses~~ in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 ~~were~~decreased ~~less than those recorded in fiscal 2011. Facilities costs were lower~~ due principally to ~~reduced~~the ~~charges~~effect ~~for~~of ~~our headquarters facility lease following~~ the ~~extension,~~restructurings. inIn the ~~second~~fourth quarter of fiscal ~~2011~~2012, ofthe ~~our~~Company ~~headquarters~~reduced ~~facility~~headcount ~~lease~~by atapproximately ~~rates~~90 ~~favorable to those in the original lease~~employees. ~~Stock~~Employee compensation ~~expense~~costs ~~was~~were significantly lower in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 ~~primarily~~and ~~because,~~other atoperating ~~the~~expenses ~~end~~were ofalso ~~fiscal~~generally ~~2011,~~lower ~~the~~in ~~Company~~fiscal ~~ended~~2013 ~~its~~reflecting ~~program~~the ofreduced ~~granting restricted stock to offset salary reductions~~headcount.

~~The~~Sales ~~third~~and ~~quarter~~marketing ofexpense was lower in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 ~~compared~~by $1.0 million. This decrease was due principally to the ~~third~~effect of headcount reductions, and related expense reductions, that have occurred since the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal ~~2011~~2012.

~~Sales~~Research and ~~marketing~~development expense: was lower in fiscal 2013 by $1.2 million. This decrease was due principally to the effect of headcount reductions that have occurred since the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal 2012.

~~Sales~~General and ~~marketing~~administrative expense ~~decreased~~was higher in fiscal 2013 by $~~584~~472,000. ~~Payroll~~Acquisition-related ~~costs~~activities were ~~lower~~principally byresponsible ~~$555,000,~~for ~~due~~increases toin ~~lower~~legal ~~stock~~costs ~~compensation~~of ~~expense~~$479,000 ~~lower sales commissions,~~ and ~~the~~increases ~~effect of the re-assignment of some technical sales support staff to our service organization~~ in ~~December~~outside ~~2010.~~services ~~Allocated facilities~~ costs ~~were~~of ~~lower by~~ $80309,000. These ~~cost~~increases ~~decreases~~ were partially offset by ~~other~~lower ~~marketing~~employee ~~costs,~~compensation ~~which were higher by $50,000 due to~~ costs ~~relating to deployments~~, inreflecting ~~the~~headcount ~~third quarter of fiscal 2012~~reductions, ofand ~~UX1000~~by ~~field~~lower ~~trial~~audit ~~products for sales and marketing purposes~~fees.

~~Research~~Restructure and ~~development~~other ~~expense:~~costs of $121,000 for fiscal 2013 reflected charges for employee separation costs related to corporate restructuring activities and a change in our estimate of the cost to vacate certain facilities.

Research and development expense decreased by $164,000. Payroll related costs were approximately equal to those incurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 as the effect of increased research and development headcount was largely offset by lower stock compensation expense. Other research and development costs were lower by $92,000, principally due to costs related to UX1000 development activities incurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 but not in fiscal 2012. Allocated facilities costs were lower by $60,000.

General and administrative expense:

General and administrative expense was higher by $66,000. Consulting costs increased by $161,000 and outside services fees, principally for audit and tax services increased by $225,000. These cost increases were partially offset by payroll related costs, which were lower by $116,000 due primarily to lower stock compensation expense. Legal costs were lower by $170,000 as costs were incurred in fiscal 2011 but not fiscal 2012 for an internal investigation of export-related activities. Allocated facilities costs were lower by $38,000.

The nine months ended December 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended December 24, 2010

Sales and marketing expense:

Sales and marketing expense was lower by $668,000. Payroll-related costs were lower by $654,000 due to lower stock compensation expense and the effect of the re-assignment of some technical sales support staff to our service organization in December 2010. Allocated facilities costs were lower by $253,000. Consulting costs were lower by $124,000 due to the effect of conversions of certain consultants to employees. These cost increases were partially offset by higher sales commissions, which were up by $212,000. Costs relating to consignment reserves increased by $75,000 and administrative costs relating to foreign sales offices increased by $65,000.

Index

Research and development expense:

Research and development expense was higher by $139,000. Payroll costs were higher by $699,000 due to increased headcount and the extra week in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. Consulting costs increased by $507,000 due to UX1000 development activities. Recruiting and relocation costs were higher by $77,000 due to recruiting costs for new hires. Engineering related expenses, which consisted principally of UX1000 development activities, were $84,000 higher. These cost increases were partially offset by lower stock compensation expense, which decreased by $688,000. Allocated facilities costs decreased by $424,000. Depreciation expense decreased by $107,000 as many capital assets came to the end of their depreciation lives over the past two years.

General and administrative expense:

General and administrative expense was lower by $724,000. Legal costs were lower by $1.3 million as costs were incurred in fiscal 2011 but not fiscal 2012 for an internal investigation of export-related activities. Stock compensation expense was lower by $440,000. Allocated facilities costs were lower by $174,000. These cost decreases were partially offset by a $623,000 increase in consulting costs and an increase of $523,000 in outside services fees, principally due to changes in the timing of recognition for costs related to audit and tax services. Payroll-related costs were higher by $140,000 due to the effect of the extra week in the second quarter of fiscal 2012.

Non-Operating Items

(in thousands, except percentages)	Three Months Ended									~~Nine Months Ended~~
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			Change			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			Change
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011				Change
Interest income	$	7442		$	~~298~~106			(7560.24	)%	$	~~277~~		$	~~731~~			~~(62.1~~	)%
Interest expense	$	(~~552~~551	)	$	(~~554~~553	)		(0.4	)	$	~~(1,658~~	)	$	~~(1,661~~	)		~~(0.2~~	)
Other income (expense), net	$	(785	)	$	6534			~~(220~~823.05	)%	$	~~(82~~	)	$	7			~~(1,271.4~~	)

Interest income was lower in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 due to lower average cash and investment balances, and to a lesser extent, lower average interest earned on investments. Average cash and investment balances were lower primarily due to the effect of operating losses inthroughout ~~the full~~ fiscal ~~year~~2012 ~~2011~~ and in the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2012~~2013.

~~Interest~~Page ~~expense~~19 ~~in fiscal 2012 and 2011 was essentially equivalent, primarily because the balance~~ of ~~long-term debt was identical throughout each of the two periods.~~24

Index

Interest expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was virtually equivalent, as the balance of long-term debt was identical throughout each of the two periods.

Other income (expense), net, consisted of:

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended						~~Nine Months Ended~~
	December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010			December 30, 2011			December 24, 2010
	June 29, 2012			June 24, 2011
Gain (loss) on foreign exchange	$	(72125	)	$	82		$	~~(137~~	)	$	~~(136~~	)
Realized gain (loss) on investments		(6	)		57			61			147
Realized gain on investments		6			36
Other		—114			—(4	)		(6	)		(4	)
	$	(785	)	$	6534		$	~~(82~~	)	$	7

Income Tax Provision

Income tax provisions were $5738,000 and $~~276~~72,000, respectively, ~~for~~in the ~~three~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~nine~~of ~~months~~fiscal ~~ended~~2013 ~~December 30, 2011~~ and ~~$33,000 and $238,000, respectively, for the comparable periods ended December 24, 2010~~2012. Provisions for income tax are primarily related to ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ international operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been our cash and investment balances, cash provided by operating activities and debt financing activities.

Cash balances: As of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012, cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash were $3630.92 million, as compared to $6135.41 million as of March 2530, ~~2011~~2012. At ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012, these amounts were invested 4262% in U.S. Treasury notes and government agency investments and cash equivalents.

Cash flow from operating activities:

Net cash used by operating activities was $234.27 million in ~~the~~fiscal ~~first~~2013 ~~nine~~compared ~~months~~to of$7.1 million in fiscal 2012. ~~compared~~The todecrease ~~$11.4~~in ~~million~~net cash used in operating activities in fiscal 2013 resulted principally from the ~~comparable~~reduction ~~prior~~in ~~year~~net ~~period~~loss in fiscal 2013 of $2.4 million, compared to fiscal 2012.

Index

The increase in net cash used in operating activities resulted principally from changes in asset and liability balances, the greater net loss in fiscal 2012, and, to a lesser extent, by changes in non-cash activities.

Changes in asset and liability balances contributed $4.6 million to the increase in cash used in operating activities. This was principally due to accounts receivable balances, which declined in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 but increased in the first nine months of fiscal 2012. The effect of the greater net loss in fiscal 2012 contributed an additional $4.9 million. Changes in non-cash activities, principally stock compensation expense, contributed another $2.4 million. Stock compensation expense was lower in fiscal 2012 primarily because, at the end of fiscal 2011, the Company ended its program of granting restricted stock to offset salary reductions.

Cash flow from investing activities:

Net cash provided by investing activities was $253.27 million in ~~the first nine months of~~ fiscal ~~2012~~2013 compared to $129.69 million in ~~the~~fiscal ~~comparable prior year period~~2012. The principal reason for this change was the net effect upon cash of purchases, sales and maturities of short-term investments. These activities provided net cash of $253.68 million and $1510.51 million in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012, respectively.

We used the cash provided by investing activities in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 principally to fund operating activities.

Cash flow from financing activities:

Net cash used in financing activities was $~~353~~55,000 in fiscal ~~2012~~2013 compared to $~~621~~145,000 in fiscal ~~2011~~2012.

Financing activities in fiscal 2013 consisted of payments for leased equipment as well as repurchases of common stock from employees to satisfy withholding tax requirements. The principal financing activity in ~~both~~ fiscal 2012 ~~and fiscal 2011~~ was repurchases of common stock from employees to satisfy withholding-tax ~~obligations~~requirements.

~~Contractual~~Our contractual obligations and contingencies decreased by $1.7 million from March 30, 2012. This decrease was principally due to ongoing interest and operating lease payments. The following table provides a summary of our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of June 29, 2012:

~~Our~~Page ~~contractual~~20 ~~obligations and contingencies decreased by $5.1 million from March 25, 2011. This decrease was principally due to ongoing interest and operating lease payments. The following table provides a summary~~ of ~~our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 30, 2011:~~24

(in thousands)		Total		2012		2013 to 2014		2015 to 2016		After 2016
Long-term debt	$	34,204	$	—	$	1,204	$	33,000	$	—
Interest on long-term debt		5,478		—		4,225		1,253		—
Operating leases		7,497		579		3,391		2,551		976
Capital leases		169		24		99		46		—
Total contractual obligations	$	47,348	$	603	$	8,919	$	36,850	$	976

We have a contract with a third-party technology supplier that calls for payments by us totaling $2.5 million upon receipt of deliverables meeting certain conditions. We believe it is unlikely these payments will become due or be paid.

We have a long-term income tax liability for uncertain tax positions amounting to $650,000 at December 30, 2011. We cannot currently predict the date of settlement or payment, as the timing of resolution of our liability is highly uncertain.

In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual commitments to purchase services, materials, components, and finished goods from suppliers, mainly our primary contract manufacturer, Plexus. Under our agreement with Plexus, we maintain a level of control over parts procurement, design, documentation, and selection of approved suppliers. We are generally liable for any termination or cancellation of product orders, as well as excess and obsolete material, which can result, for example, from an engineering change, product obsolescence, or inaccurate component forecasting. Under the agreement, Plexus is to procure raw materials and begin manufacturing of products in accordance with our forecasts. If certain purchased raw materials or certain work-in-process items are held for greater than 90 days, we must make deposits on the aging inventory, although Plexus must make efforts to minimize our liability for the aging inventory, including returning materials to suppliers, canceling orders with suppliers, or using materials to manufacture product for its other customers. If raw material or in-process inventories are still unused and have been held for more than nine months, we must take ownership and pay for the aged inventory. Alternatively, if there is forecasted demand for such inventory, we must pay a management fee for Plexus to retain such inventory. If the forecasted demand does not materialize we must take ownership and pay for such inventory. This activity may increase our owned inventories. The term of our agreement with Plexus currently runs to December 31, 2012, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless either party gives notice of intent not to renew, and subject to either party’s right to terminate upon six month’s notice.

At December 30, 2011, Plexus held inventory related to our products. Our deposit relating to this inventory was $2.7 million and reserves relating to this deposit were $1.2 million. Both the deposit and the related reserves are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additional deposits may be required under the terms of the agreement.

Index

Other contingencies: In 2010, we learned that some of our products may have been exported or re-exported in violation of U.S. export laws. Consequently, we performed an internal investigation of our export-related activities, which was conducted by outside counsel. Early in fiscal 2011, we reported a limited portion of the matter, regarding export of encryption items that may have required an export license prior to shipment, to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security (“BIS”). That portion has been closed with the issuance of a warning letter and no penalty. In September 2011, we reported the results of the rest of the internal investigation to BIS and to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). The disclosure relates to (i) a number of Tenor gateways that were sold to foreign distributors or resellers in non-sanctioned countries and subsequently came within the possession of persons located in sanctioned countries, (ii) related technical support, and (iii) certain e-mail referrals. These transactions all relate to the Quintum Tenor product line and largely relate to activity that occurred prior to NET’s December 2007 acquisition of Quintum. The Company has never had any agreement, commercial arrangement, or other contacts with the governments of sanctioned countries; has no current contacts with sanctioned countries; and has procedures and processes to ensure that no such contact occurs in the future. As a result of the discovery of the events subject to the internal investigation, we have enhanced our export compliance program and implemented more stringent export control procedures. If the U.S. government finds that we have violated one or more export control laws or trade sanctions, we could be subject to various penalties. By statute, these penalties can include but are not limited to fines of up to $250,000 for each violation, denial of export privileges, and debarment from participation in U.S. government contracts; and any assessment of penalties could also hurt the Company’s reputation, create negative investor sentiment, and affect the Company’s share value. We believe, however, that our cooperation with the U.S. government, our immediate attention to rectifying the issues, and other factors provide a basis for mitigating any penalty that might be imposed. Although it is reasonably possible that we could incur a loss as a result of penalties relating to these events, we cannot at this time determine an estimated cost, if any, or range of costs, for any such penalties or fines that may be incurred upon resolution of this matter. Accordingly, we have not made a provision for this matter.

Contractual obligations (in thousands)	Total		2013		2014 to 2015		2016 to 2017		After 2017
Current portion of long-term debt	$	1,204	$	—	$	1,204	$	—	$	—
Long-term debt		33,000		—		33,000		—		—
Interest on long-term debt		4,421		1,056		3,365		—		—
Operating leases		6,350		1,501		2,588		2,261		—
Capital leases		121		45		55		21		—
Total contractual obligations	$	45,096	$	2,602	$	40,212	$	2,282	$	—

~~Liquidity:~~ We ~~believe~~have ~~that~~a ~~our~~contract ~~existing~~with ~~cash,~~a ~~cash equivalents and short~~third-~~term~~party ~~investments~~technology ~~will~~supplier bethat ~~sufficient~~calls ~~to fund operations~~ for atpayments ~~least~~by ~~the~~us totaling ~~next twelve months~~$2.5 ~~However,~~million ifupon ~~the~~receipt ~~effects~~ of ~~our~~deliverables ~~restructuring commenced~~meeting incertain ~~January 2012 are not materially consistent with our expectations, we may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues during that period~~conditions. We ~~will~~believe ~~continue to assess our cash consumption, and our liquidity position. At any time, if we determine that~~ it is ~~necessary,~~unlikely wethese payments will ~~evaluate~~become ~~our~~due ~~alternatives and take appropriate steps to address liquidity issues, either by further reducing cash consumption, raising additional capital,~~ or ~~a combination of measures. If additional capital is needed we cannot~~ be assured that it will be available to us and, if we are unable to raise it or raise it on acceptable terms, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate some or all of our research and development programs or other operations, which may include delaying further development of our products; or reduce marketing, customer support or other resources devoted to our products or operationspaid. ~~Any of these developments could harm our business, results of operations, or financial condition.~~

~~Off-balance~~We ~~sheet~~have ~~arrangements:~~a ~~Other~~long-term ~~than~~income ~~the~~tax ~~commitments~~liability ~~described~~for ~~above,~~uncertain ~~there~~tax ~~are~~positions noamounting ~~other~~to ~~off-balance~~$371,000 ~~sheet~~at ~~arrangements~~June ~~that~~29, ~~are~~2012. ~~reasonably~~We ~~likely~~cannot tocurrently ~~materially~~predict ~~affect~~the ~~our~~date ~~financial~~of ~~condition,~~settlement ~~revenues~~ or ~~expenses~~payment, ~~results~~as the timing of ~~operations,~~resolution ~~liquidity,~~of ~~capital~~our ~~expenditures~~liability oris ~~capital~~highly ~~resources~~uncertain.

At June 29, 2012, Plexus held inventory related to our products. Our deposit relating to this inventory was $2.7 million and reserves relating to this deposit were $1.3 million. Both the deposit and the related reserves are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additional deposits may be required under the terms of the agreement.

Liquidity: We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months. However, if the effects of our restructuring commenced in January 2012 and continued in March 2012 are not materially consistent with our expectations, we may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues during that period. We will continue to assess our cash consumption, and our liquidity position. At any time, if we determine that it is necessary, we will evaluate our alternatives and take appropriate steps to address liquidity issues, either by further reducing cash consumption, raising additional capital, or a combination of measures. If additional capital is needed we cannot be assured that it will be available to us and, if we are unable to raise it or raise it on acceptable terms, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate some or all of our research and development programs or other operations, which may include delaying further development of our products; or reduce marketing, customer support or other resources devoted to our products or operations. Any of these developments could harm our business, results of operations, or financial condition.

Off-balance sheet arrangements: Other than the commitments described above, there are no other off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to materially affect our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The following are the material changes for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 from the information reported under Part II, Item 7A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2530, ~~2011~~2012:

APage ~~10%~~21 ~~change in market interest rates would change the fair value~~ of ~~our investment portfolio by $23,000, as compared to a change of $44,000 as of March 25, 2011.~~24

The fair market values of our 3¾% convertible senior notes and our 7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures are sensitive to changes in interest rates and to the price of our common stock into which they can be converted, as well as our financial stability. The yield to maturity on the notes and the debentures is fixed, therefore the interest expense on our debt does not fluctuate with interest rates.

The fair value of the 3¾% convertible senior notes was $5.5 million at December 30, 2011 and $8.7 million at March 25, 2011. The fair value of the 7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures was $16.0 million at December 30, 2011 and $21.3 million at March 25, 2011.

Index

A 10% change in market interest rates would change the fair value of our investment portfolio by $6,000, as compared to a change of $15,000 as of March 30, 2012.

The fair value of the 3¾% convertible senior notes was $2.6 million at June 29, 2012 and $1.5 million at March 30, 2012. The fair value of the 7¼% redeemable convertible subordinated debentures was $11.9 million at June 29, 2012 and $8.2 million at March 30, 2012.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 13(a) ~~through~~or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, management, under the supervision and with the participation of the chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) at the end of the period covered by this report as well as any changes in disclosure controls and procedures that occurred during the period covered by this report. Our management, including our CEO and CFO, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012.

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~There have been no material changes in disclosure controls and procedures since the filing of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2011.~~ We intend to review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures on an ongoing basis and correct any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. Our goal is to ensure that our senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning our business. While we believe the present design of our disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve our goal, future events affecting our business may cause us to significantly modify our disclosure controls and procedures.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~There~~On ~~have~~June ~~been~~21, no2012, ~~material~~a ~~developments~~purported inshareholder of the ~~three~~Company ~~related~~filed ~~lawsuits~~a inclass ~~Greece~~action ~~filed~~complaint byagainst ~~Lexis~~the SACompany, ~~against~~our adirectors ~~subsidiary~~and an executive officer of the Company, ~~Quintum~~Sonus and Sonus Merger Subsidiary in connection with the proposed merger. The action is captioned Bruno v. Network Equipment Technologies, ~~LLC~~Inc., ~~since~~et ~~the~~al., ~~disclosure~~Case ~~provided~~No. 7643, and is pending in the ~~Company’s~~Court ~~Report~~of onChancery ~~Form~~of the State of Delaware. On July 10-Q, 2012, a purported shareholder of the company filed ~~November~~a 8class action complaint against our company, ~~2011~~our directors, Sonus and Sonus Merger Subsidiary in connection with the proposed merger. ~~(See~~The ~~Note~~action 10is tocaptioned Rogers v. Keating, et al., Case No. RG12638516, and is pending in the ~~condensed~~Superior ~~consolidated~~Court ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~California for Alameda County.) InThe ~~addition~~Bruno and Rogers complaints allege that the defendants breached and/or aided and abetted the breach of their fiduciary duties to our shareholders, by seeking to sell the company through an allegedly unfair process and allegedly for an unfair price and on unfair terms. The complaints seek, among other things, equitable relief that would enjoin the merger, damages, and attorney’s fees and costs. As is common in this type of litigation, additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations concerning the proposed merger may be filed byin ~~Lexis~~the SAfuture, wein ~~are~~the ~~involved~~same inor ~~various~~other ~~legal~~courts. ~~proceedings~~The ~~from~~Company ~~time~~believes the complaints’ allegations have no merit, and intends to ~~time~~defend inagainst them vigorously. However, all litigation is inherently uncertain, and there can be no assurance that the ~~normal~~Company’s ~~course~~defense of ~~business~~these or similar actions will be successful. We have not accrued any amounts related to these complaints, as we believe that a negative outcome is not probable.

A subsidiary of the Company, Quintum Technologies, LLC (Quintum), was party, by interpleader, to three related lawsuits in Greece filed by Lexis SA, a former distributor of Quintum products in Greece. The underlying lawsuits, the first of which was filed in 2006, were cancelled due to the fact that the originating plaintiffs waived their rights against Lexis. Since a negative outcome is therefore not probable, we have not accrued any amounts related to this matter. As Lexis has not yet formally waived its rights against Quintum, hearings on the matter between Lexis and Quintum remain on calendar and are scheduled for January 2015, but we believe the scheduled hearings may not ever occur.

The Company is the subject of a complaint filed on June 7, 2012, by AIM-IP LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleges infringement of a patent relating to the G.729 audio data compression algorithm. We believe that we have various defenses to the complaint, although legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur. We have not accrued an amount relating to this matter as the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to the risks and uncertainties described in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K (as amended) and as set forth below. There may be additional risks that have not yet been identified and risks that are not material now but could become material. Any one of these risks could hurt our business, results of operations or financial condition. Investors should carefully review the risk factors described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and ~~our~~any ~~subsequently~~amendments ~~filed~~thereto, ~~reports~~and ~~on Form 10-Q. There are no changes to~~ the ~~risk factors included in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K.~~following:

Page 22 of 24

Index

The potential merger with Sonus subjects us to a number of potential material risks.

Our entrance into the merger agreement with Sonus subjects us to a number of potential material risks. In particular, we have incurred and will incur significant costs in connection with the merger. In addition, the announcement and pursuit of the merger may have a negative effect upon our management and other resources available for the continued operation of our business in the ordinary course, our ability to attract and retain key personnel, and our ability to retain and attract customers and to maintain and grow sales, any of which could negatively impact our operating results and stock price. The merger agreement contains restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the consummation of the acquisition, generally requiring us to conduct our business in the ordinary course and preventing us from taking certain specified actions, subject to specific limitations, all of which may delay or prevent us from undertaking business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger and could adversely affect us if the merger is not completed and we remain independent.

If the merger with Sonus is not consummated for any reason, including the failure of our stockholders to adopt the merger agreement or the failure to receive the required regulatory approvals, or if there is a delay in the consummation of the merger, we could be subject to a number of material risks, including potentially negative effects on our operating results and stock price, our ability to attract and retain key personnel, our ability to retain and attract customers and to maintain and grow sales, and the progress of certain projects under development. In addition, under certain circumstances, we could be required to pay a termination fee of $1.25 million to Sonus in order to terminate our merger agreement with Sonus and accept a superior acquisition proposal from a third party, which may discourage third parties from making a competing proposal to acquire NET and could negatively impact our operating results and stock price.

If the merger with Sonus is consummated, our stockholders will cease to participate in our future earnings growth or benefit from any future increase in our value following the merger, and will not be able to realize any benefit from possibility that the price of the shares might have increased in the future to a price greater than $1.35 per share.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Common Stock

The following table reflects purchases made by the Company of its common stock during the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012:

Fiscal Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
October 1 – October 28, 2011		—		—		—	$	—
March 31 – April 27, 2012		—		—		—	$	—
October 29 – November 25, 2011		29,803	$	2.02		—	$	—
April 28 – May 25, 2012		21,232	$	1.00		—	$	—
November 26 – December 30, 2011		—		—		—	$	—
May 26 – June 29, 2012		—		—		—	$	—
		29,803	$	2.02		—	$	—
		21,232	$	1.00		—	$	—

(1) During the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012, 2921,~~803~~232 shares were acquired directly from employees as payment of tax withholding obligations upon vesting of restricted stock awards.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

Page 23 of 24

Index

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a)

Exhibits

	31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (CEO).
	31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (CFO).
	32.1*	Section 1350 Certification (CEO).
	32.2*	Section 1350 Certification (CFO).
	101**	The following materials from Network Equipment Technologies, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2011~~2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
	*	Filed herewith
	**	Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

	*	Filed herewith
	**	Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 7, 2012	NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Dated: August 10, 2012	NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	By: /s/ C. NICHOLAS KEATING, JR.
	By:	/s/DAVID WAGENSELLER
	C. Nicholas Keating, Jr.
	David Wagenseller
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	Chief Executive Officer
	By: /s/ DAVID WAGENSELLER
	By:	/s/ KAREN C. CARTE
	David Wagenseller
	Karen C. Carte
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	By: /s/ KAREN CARTE
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
	Karen Carte
	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

Page 24 of 24

Filing Compare · NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC