UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 333-117633

SENECA GAMING CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable		7990		54-2122988
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

310 Fourth Street
Niagara Falls, New York (Seneca Nation Territory) 14303
(716) 299-1100

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,

including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant ~~has~~ (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No x

(Note: As a voluntary filer, not subject to the filing requirements, the registrant filed all reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer x		Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

At ~~May~~ August 76, 2010, the registrant had no outstanding shares of common stock. The registrant is wholly owned by the Seneca Nation of Indians.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	23
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and September 30, 2009	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and September 30, 2009	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income and Changes in Capital for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Changes in Capital for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)	5
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	56
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1620
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3746
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3846
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3948
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4049
Item 6.	Exhibits	4150
	Signatures	4251

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item I. Financial Statements

SENECA GAMING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	March 31,		September 30,
	June 30,		September 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7868,~~291~~963	$	83,230
Short-term investments	—		113
Receivables from the Nation	~~197~~469		6,201
Other receivables, net	2,~~352~~607		2,539
Inventories	3,~~938~~873		4,046
Other current assets	10,~~358~~130		10,369
Total current assets	9586,~~136~~042		106,498
Property and equipment, net	~~668~~661,~~497~~798		670,111
Restricted cash	3347,~~013~~910		—
Other long-term assets	64,~~377~~308		65,319
Total assets	$	~~861~~860,~~023~~058	$	841,928
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities:
Trade payables	$	129,~~255~~173	$	2,328
Construction payables	54,~~352~~624		9,373
Distributions payable to the Nation	311,~~745~~180		3,727
Exclusivity fees payable	119,~~062~~923		8,220
Accrued interest payable	156,~~104~~042		15,104
Accrued regulatory costs	3840,~~498~~433		33,683
Accrued gaming liabilities	15,~~262~~465		15,113
Accrued payroll and related liabilities	97,~~230~~487		9,652
Other current liabilities	6,~~066~~390		6,722
Total current liabilities	~~116~~110,~~574~~717		103,922
Long-term debt	~~497~~498,~~870~~124		497,363
Other long-term liabilities	~~834~~—		834
Total liabilities	~~615~~608,~~278~~841		602,119
Capital:
Retained earnings	~~245~~251,~~745~~217		239,809
Total liabilities and capital	$	~~861~~860,~~023~~058	$	841,928

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SENECA GAMING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~INCOME~~OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN CAPITAL

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Revenues
Gaming	$	~~128~~139,~~904~~932		$	~~128~~137,~~452~~175		$	~~253~~392,~~017~~949		$	~~255~~392,~~439~~615
Food and beverage	1314,~~574~~508			14,~~231~~739			2641,~~829~~337			2843,~~435~~174
Lodging	46,~~640~~389			5,~~577~~928			917,~~844~~885			1117,~~872~~800
Retail, entertainment and other	5,~~066~~842			5,~~825~~353			1016,~~958~~800			1217,~~266~~619
Gross Revenue	~~152~~166,~~184~~671			~~154~~163,~~085~~195			~~300~~468,~~648~~971			~~308~~471,~~012~~208
Less: Promotional allowances	(1214,~~964~~825		)	(14,~~047~~163		)	(2642,~~265~~743		)	(2943,~~255~~419		)
Net revenues	~~139~~151,~~220~~846			~~140~~149,~~038~~032			~~274~~426,~~383~~228			~~278~~427,~~757~~789
Expenses
Gaming	4243,~~487~~913			3638,~~424~~884			78122,~~209~~122			73112,~~650~~534
Food and beverage	10,~~488~~736			1011,~~697~~126			2131,~~088~~824			2133,~~904~~030
Lodging	2,~~866~~896			3,~~128~~084			58,~~851~~747			69,~~159~~243
Retail, entertainment and other	3,~~215~~325			3,~~467~~307			710,~~387~~711			710,~~445~~752
Advertising, general and administrative	45,~~095~~875			4645,~~365~~084			92138,~~195~~071			95140,~~865~~949
Pre-opening costs	20286			78110			92378			~~136~~246
Depreciation	11,~~045~~110			1211,~~583~~668			2132,~~775~~885			2536,~~170~~838
Impairment of property and equipment	~~166~~—			—109,036			221			—109,036
Total operating expenses	~~115~~118,~~382~~141			~~112~~222,~~742~~299			~~226~~344,~~818~~959			~~230~~452,~~329~~628
Operating income	23,838			27,296			47,565			48,428
Operating income (loss)	33,705			(73,267		)	81,269			(24,839		)
Other non-operating expense	—			(5025		)	(113		)	(~~163~~188		)
Interest income	1429			23118			2554			81199
Interest expense	(9,~~530~~628		)	(9,~~674~~500		)	(1928,~~071~~699		)	(1928,~~277~~777		)
Net income	$	14,322		$	17,595		$	28,406		$	29,069
Net income (loss)	$	24,106		$	(82,674	)	$	52,511		$	(53,605	)
Beginning capital balance	$	~~246~~245,~~403~~745		$	~~285~~312,~~814~~676		$	239,809		$	290,846
Net cash distributions (to) from the Nation	(14,980		)	9,267			(22,470		)	(7,239		)
Net cash distributions declared to the Nation	(18,634		)	(12,698		)	(41,103		)	(19,937		)
Ending capital balance	$	~~245~~251,~~745~~217		$	~~312~~217,~~676~~304		$	~~245~~251,~~745~~217		$	~~312~~217,~~676~~304

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SENECA GAMING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Cash flows relating to operating activities:
Net income	$	28,406		$	29,069
Net income (loss)	$	52,511		$	(53,605	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	2132,~~775~~885			2536,~~170~~838
Loss on disposal of assets	9183			7155
Amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount	12,~~633~~455			12,~~621~~432
Other than temporary decline in investments	113			~~150~~175
Provision for bad debts	5132			~~201~~296
Impairment of property and equipment	221			109,036
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Current assets	~~1,158~~943			(12,~~113~~104		)
Current liabilities	6(3,~~318~~836		)	4(8,~~659~~432		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	5985,~~545~~407			5984,~~764~~791
Cash flows relating to investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(1322,~~936~~532		)	(3340,~~786~~137		)
Deposits to restricted cash	(3347,~~013~~910		)	—
Change in long-term deposits	108			5082
Land acquisition costs	(~~115~~612		)	(~~482~~1,022		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(4771,~~054~~046		)	(3441,~~218~~077		)
Cash flows relating to financing activities:
Contribution received from the Nation	5,101			—
Cash paid for deferred financing fees	(79		)	—
Proceeds from senior secured revolving loan agreement	—			20,000
Distributions paid to the Nation	(22,452		)	(33,239		)
Payments on senior secured revolving loan agreement	—			(20,000		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(17,430		)	(13,239		)
Distributions paid to the Nation	(33,650		)	(43,937		)
Net increase(decrease) in cash	(4,939		)	12,307
Net cash used in financing activities	(28,628		)	(43,937		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(14,267		)	(223		)
Cash and cash equivalents balances:
Beginning of period	83,230			53,305
End of period	$	7868,~~291~~963		$	6553,~~612~~082

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SENECA GAMING CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Seneca Gaming Corporation, or SGC, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, or collectively, the Company. In consolidation, all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The accompanying unaudited consolidated ~~financial~~ financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally ~~accepted~~ accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of SGC’s management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for SGC’s fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. For further information, reference is made to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in SGC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, or 2009 Form 10-K, as well as SGC’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

SGC, which was formed on August 1, 2002, is wholly owned by the Seneca Nation of Indians, or the Nation. The Nation is a federally recognized Indian tribe with total territorial land comprising approximately 54,000 acres in the Western New York region. SGC was organized by the Nation to operate and manage its Class III gaming activities on the Nation’s territories pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, or IGRA. Under IGRA, federally recognized Indian tribes are permitted to conduct full-scale casino gaming operations on tribal land, subject to, among other things, the negotiation of a compact with the affected state. Pursuant to IGRA, in August 2002, the Nation entered into the Nation-State Gaming Compact with the State of New York, or the Compact, which has been approved by the Federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior. The Compact became effective in December 2002, expires in December 2016 and automatically renews for an additional seven year period unless either the Nation or the State of New York objects in writing, in which case the parties are required to negotiate in good faith to address the objecting party’s concerns, with only the issue of a party’s good faith subject to third party dispute resolution. The Compact provides that its terms will remain in effect during the pendency of such negotiations. The Compact provides the Nation with the exclusive right to conduct Class III gaming activities at three sites in the western region of the State of New York, subject to certain limited exceptions.

The Nation’s Constitution established the Nation’s Council, or the Council, to act as the Nation’s legislative authority. The Council acts on the Nation’s behalf with respect to SGC, and the Council established the Seneca Gaming Authority, or SGA, to regulate the gaming activities of SGC under the Compact.

The Council, at the request of the SGC Board of Directors, chartered three subsidiary corporations of SGC to operate the three sites authorized by the Compact. In addition, the SGC Board of Directors hired the executive management of SGC to oversee, develop and manage the three sites. The subsidiary corporations that operate the three sites authorized by the Compact are as follows:

· Seneca Niagara Falls Gaming Corporation, or SNFGC;

· Seneca Territory Gaming Corporation, or STGC; and

· Seneca Erie Gaming Corporation, or SEGC.

~~Seneca Niagara Falls Gaming Corporation~~6

SNFGC was formed on August 1, 2002 to operate the Nation’s Class III gaming activities on the Nation’s territory in Niagara Falls, New York. Operations at SNFGC’s casino, or Seneca Niagara Casino, commenced December 31, 2002. On March 31, 2006, SNFGC officially completed the phased opening of its luxury hotel expansion, which included a permanent 147,000 square foot gaming facility (adding 35,000 square feet of gaming space to the original 112,000 square-foot facility), a 604-room luxury hotel with 118 suites of various sizes, a full-service spa, salon, and fitness center, three fine dining restaurants and a 24-hour casual restaurant, three retail stores, and a 24,000 square-

Table of Contents

~~foot multi-purpose room and events center. The luxury hotel is adjacent and connected to the~~ Seneca ~~Niagara~~ ~~Casino. The entire complex, including the luxury hotel and the Seneca~~ Niagara ~~Casino,~~Falls isGaming ~~referred to as the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel.~~Corporation

SNFGC was formed on August 1, 2002 to operate the Nation’s Class III gaming activities on the Nation’s territory in Niagara Falls, New York. Operations at SNFGC’s casino, or Seneca Niagara Casino, commenced December 31, 2002. On March 31, 2006, SNFGC completed the phased opening of its luxury hotel expansion, which included a permanent 147,000 square foot gaming facility (adding 35,000 square feet of gaming space to the original 112,000 square-foot facility), a 604-room luxury hotel with 118 suites of various sizes, a full-service spa, salon and fitness center, three fine dining restaurants and a 24-hour casual restaurant, three retail stores, and a 24,000 square-foot multi-purpose room and events center. The luxury hotel is adjacent and connected to the Seneca Niagara Casino. The entire complex, including the luxury hotel and the Seneca Niagara Casino, is referred to as the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel.

Seneca Territory Gaming Corporation

STGC was formed on September 20, 2003 to operate the Nation’s Class III gaming activities in Salamanca, New York on the Nation’s then-existing territorial land. Operations at STGC’s casino, or Seneca Allegany Casino, commenced May 1, 2004 utilizing an approximately 120,000 square foot temporary structure. On March 30, 2007, the phased opening of the permanent gaming facility and resort hotel was completed, which included a permanent 63,500 square foot gaming facility (adding 12,000 square feet of additional gaming space to the original temporary gaming facility), a 212-room resort hotel, two fine dining restaurants, a 24-hour casual restaurant, a spa and fitness center, and retail and other amenities. In March 2008, STGC completed a conversion of the former approximately 120,000 square foot temporary casino structure into an events center and multi-purpose room with a seating capacity for 2,200 people, along with additional administrative and support space. The entire complex, including the Seneca Allegany Casino, resort hotel, and events center, is referred to as the Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel.

Seneca Erie Gaming Corporation

SEGC was formed on August 9, 2003 to operate the Nation’s Class III gaming activities in Erie County, New York. On October 3, 2005, the ~~Nation~~ Nation acquired approximately nine acres of land in the inner-harbor district of of downtown Buffalo, New York. SEGC commenced construction of its Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino on those nine acres on December 8, 2005, and on July 3, 2007 commenced Class III gaming on such property in a temporary facility, in fulfillment of the requirement set forth in the Nation’s Compact with the State of New York. The facility ~~features~~featured approximately 6,000 10square feet of gaming space,~~600~~ 135 slot machines and a snack bar. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, that facility was expanded to include an additional 109 slot machines. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the existing facility was further expanded to include an additional 4,600 square feet of gaming space and ~~includes~~an additional 213 slot machines. The current facility has approximately 10,600 square feet of gaming space, and features 457 slot machines and a snack bar. Various plaintiffs have filed suit in federal and state court challenging the Nation’s right to conduct Class III gaming on the Nation’s nine acre Buffalo Creek Territory. On July 8, 2008, in a federal suit captioned Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County (CACGEC) v. Hogen, the Court issued a decision and order finding that, although the Nation’s Buffalo Creek Territory is “Indian country,” the determination by the National Indian Gaming Commission, or NIGC, that the Nation’s Buffalo Creek Territory is gaming-eligible land pursuant to the IGRA’s settlement of a land claim exception was “arbitrary, capricious, and not in accordance with the law.” The Court’s decision did not provide for injunctive relief, and SEGC has continued its operations at the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino. Plaintiffs ~~subsequently~~ subsequently filed a motion on July 14, 2008 to force the court to enforce ~~its~~ its judgment.

On January 20, 2009, the NIGC approved an amended Class III Gaming Ordinance that had been submitted by the Nation and concluded that, based upon new Department of the Interior regulations, IGRA’s general prohibition against gaming on after-acquired lands did not apply to lands such as the Buffalo Creek Territory that are held in restricted fee, and that gaming on the Nation’s Buffalo Creek Territory is not precluded by IGRA. Subsequently, on January 30, 2009, the District Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to ~~enforce, and further concluded that the NIGC’s new analysis is presumed valid unless it becomes the subject of a successful legal challenge.~~

On March 31, 2009, plaintiffs in the litigation noted in the foregoing paragraph filed suit to challenge the NIGC’s approval of the amended Class III Gaming Ordinance. On June 15, 2009, the Nation moved to intervene as a defendant in the litigation known as CACGEC III, for certain limited claims. On March 30, 2010, the Court denied the Nation’s motion to intervene, while granting permission to participate as amicus curiae. The Court also dismissed certain secondary claims of the plaintiffs in the proceeding, while allowing other core claims regarding the eligibility of the land for casino gaming to proceed.7

Table of Contents

enforce, and further concluded that the NIGC’s new analysis is presumed valid unless it becomes the subject of a successful legal challenge.

On March 31, 2009, plaintiffs in the litigation noted in the foregoing paragraph filed suit to challenge the NIGC’s approval of the amended Class III Gaming Ordinance. On June 15, 2009, the Nation moved to intervene as a defendant in the litigation known as CACGEC III, for certain limited claims. On March 30, 2010, the Court denied the Nation’s motion to intervene, while granting permission to participate as amicus curiae. The Court also dismissed certain secondary claims of the plaintiffs in the proceeding, while allowing other core claims regarding the eligibility of the land for casino gaming to proceed. On May 18, 2010, the Nation filed a notice of interlocutory appeal with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on the issue of its right to intervene.

If the plaintiffs are successful in any of the Buffalo Creek-related legal proceedings, SEGC may be unable to continue Class III gaming at the existing Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino.

Other

Lewiston Golf Course Corporation

The Nation’s Council has also chartered, at the request of the SGC Board of Directors, an additional subsidiary corporation, Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, or LGCC, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of SNFGC. LGCC was formed on July 18, 2007 by the Nation’s Council to own, develop and operate Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, SNFGC’s ~~tournament~~championship level golf course, in Lewiston, New York. It is located approximately 10 miles from the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel. The golf course opened for public play on July 2, 2010. The golf course will serve as an amenity for SGC’s patrons and is intended to enable SGC to increase its demographic and geographic reach. Designed by world-renowned golf architect Robert Trent Jones II, Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club currently features a scenic, par-72, PGA-style layout and temporary pro shop. The permanent clubhouse is currently under construction and will feature approximately 4,300 square feet of space, including a pro shop, bar and casual dining for 40 patrons. The area around the clubhouse has been designed to accommodate tents and support facilities for large tournaments.

Table of Contents

Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel in the Town of Lewiston. The golf course will serve as an amenity for our patrons enabling SGC to increase its demographic and geographic reach. Designed by world-renowned golf architect Robert Trent Jones II, Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club will feature a scenic, par-72, links-style layout and a 4,300 square foot clubhouse with a pro shop, bar and casual dining for 40 patrons. The golf course is scheduled to open July 1, 2010.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~February~~April 2010, ~~the~~ the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or ~~the~~ FASB, issued an Accounting ~~Standards~~ Standards Update ~~2010-09~~, “~~Subsequent Events~~Entertainment-Casinos (Topic ~~855~~924), —Accruals ~~Amendments~~for toCasino ~~Certain~~Base ~~Recognition~~Jackpot Liabilities, ~~and~~a ~~Disclosure Requirements~~consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force,” or ~~Update~~ ASU 2010-0916. ~~Update~~The objective of ASU 2010-0916 ~~removes~~is to address the ~~requirement~~accounting for casino ~~companies~~base ~~filing~~jackpot ~~periodic~~liabilities. ~~reports~~Specifically, ~~with~~it addresses diversity in practice regarding whether an entity accrues liabilities for a base jackpot before it is won if the ~~SEC,~~entity oris ~~SEC~~not ~~filers,~~required to ~~disclose~~award the base jackpot. Some entities do ~~date~~not ~~through~~accrue ~~which~~liabilities anfor ~~entity~~a ~~has~~base ~~evaluated~~jackpot ~~subsequent~~before ~~events~~it is won because they could avoid the payment. ~~However,~~ Other entities accrue liabilities for a base jackpot ratably over the ~~disclosure~~period ~~exemption~~of ~~does~~play expected to precede payout. ASU 2010-16 clarifies that an entity should not accrue jackpot liabilities (or portions thereof) before a ~~relieve~~jackpot ~~management~~is ofwon if the entity can avoid paying that jackpot. Jackpots should be accrued and charged to revenue when an ~~SEC~~entity ~~filer~~has ~~from~~the ~~its~~obligation ~~responsibility~~to pay the jackpot. This guidance applies to ~~evaluate~~both base and progressive jackpots and is effective ~~subsequent~~for ~~events~~fiscal ~~through~~years, ~~the~~and ~~date~~interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or ~~which~~after ~~financial~~December 15, ~~statements~~2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively ~~issued. Update~~with ~~2010~~a cumulative-09effect ~~became~~adjustment ~~effective~~reflected in retained earnings. The ~~for~~cumulative-effect adjustment is the ~~Company~~difference ~~for~~between the ~~second~~amounts ~~quarter~~recognized in the statement of ~~Fiscal~~financial ~~2010. The~~position ~~adoption~~before initial application of the amendments ~~provisions~~and ofthe amounts recognized in the ~~Update~~statement of financial position at ~~did~~initial ~~not~~application ~~have~~of athose ~~material~~amendments. The Company is currently evaluating the impact implementation of ASU 2010-16 will have on the ~~Company’s~~ consolidated financial statements.

InA ~~April 2010,~~variety ~~the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update, “Entertainment-Casinos (Topic 924), Accruals for Casino Base Jackpot Liabilities, a consensus~~ of ~~the~~proposed ~~FASB Emerging Issues Task Force,”~~ or ~~ASU 2010-16. The objective of ASU 2010-16 is to address~~ ~~the~~otherwise potential accounting ~~for~~standards ~~casino~~are ~~base~~currently ~~jackpot~~under ~~liabilities.~~study ~~Specifically, it addresses~~by diversity in practice regarding whether an entity accrues liabilities for a base jackpot before it is won if the entity is not required to award the base jackpot. Some entities do not accrue liabilities for a base jackpot before it is won because they could avoid the payment. Other entities accrue liabilities for a base jackpot ratably over the period of play expected to precede payout. ASU 2010standard-16setting ~~clarifies~~organizations ~~that an entity should not accrue jackpot liabilities (or portions thereof) before a jackpot is won if the entity can avoid paying that jackpot. Jackpots should be accrued~~ and ~~charged~~certain toregulatory ~~revenue when an entity has the obligation to pay the jackpot~~agencies. ~~This~~Because ~~guidance~~of applies to both base and progressive jackpots and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment reflected in retained earnings. The cumulative-effect adjustment is the ~~difference~~tentative ~~between the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position before initial application of the amendments~~ and ~~the~~preliminary ~~amounts recognized~~nature ~~in the statement~~ of ~~financial position at initial application of those amendments. The Company is currently evaluating the impact implementation of ASU 2010-16 will have on the consolidated financial statements.~~

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard-setting organizations and certain regulatory agencies. Because of the tentative and preliminary nature of such proposed standards, the Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of such proposed standards would have on the consolidated financial statements.8

Table of Contents

such proposed standards, the Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of such proposed standards would have on the consolidated financial statements.

2. Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments ~~are~~ are classified as available for sale as defined in the FASB Accounting ~~Standards~~ Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities. Investments are stated at fair value. The Company evaluates investments for conditions that may indicate that an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred. In conducting this review, numerous factors are considered which, individually or in combination, may indicate that a decline is other-than-temporary. Based on this evaluation, an other-than-temporary loss on one specific investment of $0 and $~~0.1~~25,000 ~~million~~ was recorded in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and an other-than-temporary loss on one specific investment of $0.1 million and $0.2 million was recorded in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as a component of other non-operating expense. The cost basis of this investment has been reduced by the amount of the other-than-temporary loss recorded.

3. Property and Equipment

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the carrying value of the Company’s assets are reviewed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined that an impairment loss has occurred based on current and future levels of income and expected future cash flows as well as other factors, then an impairment loss is recognized as a deduction in determining operating income.

7During the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010, $0 and $221,000 was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment in addition to the $107.6 million impairment recognized as of September 30, 2009.

~~Table~~On August 27, 2008, the construction activities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Hotel were suspended for various reasons including: the economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on the Company’s available cash, such as the Company’s payments to the Nation. As of ~~Contents~~June 30, 2010, due to the continuation of weak economic conditions, adverse credit market conditions and an uncertain economic outlook, construction remains suspended indefinitely. Furthermore, certain master planning efforts related to the future expansion of the Niagara Falls property have been suspended for the foreseeable future for the same reasons. As a result of these circumstances an impairment charge of $107.6 million was recognized during the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009 based upon an estimate of the net realizable value based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows that projected no future benefit. The reported fair value of zero is considered to be Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy as established by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Level 3 inputs are defined as inputs for which significant valuation assumptions are unobservable in a market and therefore value is based on the best available data, some of which is internally developed and considers risk premiums that a market participant would require. Refer to “Note 6 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, for further discussion of the fair value hierarchy.

determining operating income.

During the three months and six months ended March 31, 2010, $166,000 and $221,000 was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment in addition to the $107.6 million impairment recognized during Fiscal 2009.

On August 27, 2008, the construction activities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Hotel were suspended for various reasons including: the economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on our available cash, such as our payments to the Nation. As of March 31, 2010, due to the continuation of weak economic conditions, adverse credit market conditions and an uncertain economic outlook, construction remains suspended indefinitely. Furthermore, certain master planning efforts related to the future expansion of the Niagara Falls property have been suspended for the foreseeable future for the same reasons. As a result of these circumstances an impairment charge of $107.6 million was recognized during the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009 based upon an estimate of the net realizable value based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows that projected no future benefit. The reported fair value of zero is considered to be level three within the fair value hierarchy as established by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Level three inputs are defined as inputs for which significant valuation assumptions are unobservable in a market and therefore value is based on the best available data, some of which is internally developed and considers risk premiums that a market participant would require. Refer to Note 6, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for further discussion of the fair value hierarchy.

4. Restricted Cash

Restricted cash balances of $3347.09 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 represent cash reserved for future repayment of outstanding debt and other accrued liabilities, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, such balances include $1525.95 million of cash reserves for future repayment of of outstanding debt and $1722.14 million for satisfaction of other accrued liabilities.

5. Principal Debt Arrangements

Long-term debt, as described below, consists of the following:

	As of
	March 31, 2010		September 30, 2009
	(In Thousands of Dollars)
2004 7¼% senior notes due 2012	$	300,000	$	300,000
2005 7¼% senior notes due 2012 net of unamortized discount of $2,130 and $2,637, respectively	197,870		197,363
Long-term debt	$	497,870	$	497,363

Table of Contents

	As of
	June 30, 2010		September 30, 2009
	(In Thousands of Dollars)
2004 7¼% senior notes due 2012	$	300,000	$	300,000
2005 7¼% senior notes due 2012 net of unamortized discount of $1,876 and $2,637, respectively	198,124		197,363
Long-term debt	$	498,124	$	497,363

7¼% Senior Notes due 2012

On May 5, 2004, SGC issued $300.0 million in 7¼% senior notes due 2012, or the 2004 senior notes. On May 23, 2005, SGC issued an additional $200.0 million in 7¼% senior notes due 2012, Series B, or the 2005 senior notes, and together with the 2004 senior notes, the Senior Notes.

The 2005 senior notes were issued at a discount of $7.0 million. The discount is being amortized over the term of the 2005 senior notes, which amounted to $0.3 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009 and $0.5 8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009.

The Senior Notes are guaranteed by SNFGC, STGC, SEGC and LGCC. The 2005 senior notes are treated as a single class with the 2004 senior notes and are identical to the 2004 senior notes, except for certain tax attributes, and prior to November 1, 2005, the amount of interest accrued thereon. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1. The Senior Notes are unsecured and rank equally. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and September 30, 2009, aggregate accrued and unpaid interest on the Senior Notes was $6.0 million and $15.1 million, respectively. The Senior Notes, which mature on May 1, 2012, are redeemable at SGC’s option in whole or in part at any time after May 1, 2008 at the redemption prices set forth in the Senior Notes Indenture, are subject to redemption requirements imposed by gaming laws and regulations and are required to be repurchased by SGC at the option of holders upon certain change of control events.

8The Senior Notes Indenture contains certain negative and affirmative covenants. The negative covenants include limitations on restricted payments and the incurrence of indebtedness, while the affirmative covenants include reporting obligations and compliance with laws. As of June 30, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Indenture.

Table of Contents

The Senior Notes Indenture contains certain negative and affirmative covenants. The negative covenants include limitations on restricted payments and the incurrence of indebtedness, while the affirmative covenants include reporting obligations and compliance with laws. As of March 31, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Indenture.

Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement

On December 18, 2009, SGC amended its $50.0 million Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date from December 19, 2009 to December 31, 2011. Amounts borrowed under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to bear interest at either one, three or six-month LIBOR plus one and one quarter percent (1.25%), or the prime rate (as reported in The Wall Street Journal) plus one quarter percent (0.25%), with any outstanding principal balance to be paid by, or on, the new maturity date. The $50.0 million commitment under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement reduces in tandem with any reduction in the letter of credit requirement imposed by the Empire State Development Corporation, or ESDC, (relating to the ESDC’s efforts on behalf of SGC in connection with ongoing condemnation proceedings in Niagara Falls, New York), up to an aggregate reduction of $10.0 million. As of June 30, 2010, the commitment was reduced to $49.2 million in accordance with this provision. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement requires that SGC maintain all of its deposit and investment accounts with the lender, subject to limited exceptions for certain existing accounts.In addition, beginning June 18, 2010 the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement provides for the lender’s restriction of certain SGC deposits maintained with the lender, for commitments in excess of

SGC’s obligations under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to be secured by substantially all gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. SGC’s obligations are guaranteed by SNFGC, STGC, SEGC and LGCC, and the guarantors’ obligations continue to be secured by substantially all of each guarantor’s gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement modifies certain of the financial covenants contained in the Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement, including reducing the minimum consolidated EBITDA covenant from $160 million to $145 million (on a rolling 12 month basis) as well as modifying the total leverage ratio (of total funded debt to EBITDA) to a limit of 3.5 to 1.0. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement also continues to contain additional customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the creation of additional liens and the disposition of assets. As of March 31, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.10

AsTable of ~~March 31,~~ 2010, at SGC’s request, the lender under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement had issued letters of credit totaling $18.3 million, $13.2 million of which may be drawn upon to fund the purchase of certain parcels within the 50 acre “footprint” described in the Compact with New York State and designated for ownership by the Nation (as required by the ESDC), with the remaining $5.1 million issued in connection with worker’s compensation policies and certain other contracts, as required. As of March 31, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding on the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.Contents

$40 million. As of June 30, 2010, the amount restricted under this provision amounts to $9.2 million, and is reported as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.

SGC’s obligations under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to be secured by substantially all gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. SGC’s obligations are guaranteed by SNFGC, STGC, SEGC and LGCC, and the guarantors’ obligations continue to be secured by substantially all of each guarantor’s gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement modifies certain of the financial covenants contained in the Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement, including reducing the minimum consolidated EBITDA covenant from $160 million to $145 million (on a rolling 12 month basis) as well as modifying the total leverage ratio (of total funded debt to EBITDA) to a limit of 3.5 to 1.0. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement also continues to contain additional customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the creation of additional liens and the disposition of assets. As of June 30, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.

As of June 30, 2010, at SGC’s request, the lender under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement had issued letters of credit totaling $17.4 million, $12.3 million of which may be drawn upon to fund the purchase of certain parcels within the 50 acre “footprint” described in the Compact with New York State and designated for ownership by the Nation (as required by the ESDC), with the remaining $5.1 million issued in connection with worker’s compensation policies and certain other contracts, as required. As of June 30, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding on the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.

6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and ~~Disclosures~~ ~~(“Codification Topic 820”)~~ Disclosures does not determine or affect the ~~circumstances~~ circumstances under which fair value measurements are used, but defines fair value, expands disclosure requirements around fair value and specifies a hierarchy of of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation ~~techniques~~ techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

· Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

· Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

· Level 3: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

This hierarchy requires us to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. For some products or in certain market conditions, observable inputs may not be available.

Table of Contents

inputs when determining fair value. For some products or in certain market conditions, observable inputs may not be available.

The fair values of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and other current liabilities, approximate their recorded carrying amounts because of their short-term nature.

The fair value of long term debt is estimated based on current market quotes of SGC’s debt. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the carrying amount and fair value of ~~long~~ long term debt is approximately $498 million and $~~495~~489 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

7. Related-Party Transactions

Distributions

Distributions to the Nation, as described below, consist of the following:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009
	(In Millions of Dollars)
Cash distributions	$	1522.05	$	2633.2
Distribution Agreement distributions	711.52		710.07
	$	2233.57	$	3343.29

Cash Distributions

· SGC paid cash distributions to the Nation in the amount of $2.5 million per month during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, totaling $1522.0 5 million. Additionally, $7.5 million of distributions, declared by the Board of Directors during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and payable to the Nation, are recorded on the unaudited consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2010 as distributions payable.

· SGC paid cash distributions to the Nation in the amount of $4.0 million per month from October 2008 through February 2009, ~~totaling~~$1.0 million in April 2009 and $203.0 million per month from May 2009 through June 2009, totaling $27.0 million. Also, during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, SGC paid $5.0 ~~million~~ million pursuant to distribution declarations made in July 2008. In addition, in November 2008, SGC paid an additional $1.2 million distribution to the Nation.

Distribution Agreement Obligations

· During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 and 2009, SGC distributed $711.52 million and $710.07 million, respectively, to the Nation under the Distribution Agreement, dated April 27, 2007, relating to the Seneca Nation of Indians Capital Improvements Authority’s special obligation bonds. Additionally, $3.7 million of distributions, declared by the Board of Directors during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and payable to the Nation, are recorded on the unaudited consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2010 as distributions payable. See “Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies” for additional ~~information~~ information regarding SGC’s Distribution Agreement obligations.

Contributions

Contributions from the Nation, as described below, consist of the following:

Cash Contributions

· In September 2009, the Nation declared a capital contribution, in the amount of $5.1 million, for the value of land previously purchased for the development of the Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel. This amount was recorded as a receivable from the Nation at September 30, 2009 and payment was received in December 2009.

~~Land and Related Acquisition Costs~~12

SGC has recorded approximately $59.2 million and $59.1 million in land and related acquisition costs as ‘Other long-term assets’ in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, which are expected to be transferred to the Nation.

Table of Contents

Land and Related Acquisition Costs

SGC has recorded approximately $59.7 million and $59.1 million in land and related acquisition costs as ‘Other long-term assets’ in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, which are expected to be transferred to the Nation.

Operating Lease Agreements

Head Leases:

The Nation has entered into operating lease agreements (each, a Head Lease) with each of SNFGC, STGC and SEGC. Due to the related party nature of these Head Leases, which can be effectively modified by the Nation, SGC records monthly Head Lease expense equal to the required payment amount for the respective month. Payment increases under the Head Leases are restricted under the terms of the Indenture governing the Senior Notes and the Distribution Agreement referenced in “Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies.” The Head Leases contain no renewal options or escalation clauses.

Expenses resulting from the above Head Leases were as follows for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(Dollars in Millions)
SNFGC	$	9.0	$	89.80	$	1827.01	$	1827.01
STGC	6.0		56.50		1218.0		1218.0
SEGC	4.0		34.50		811.09		811.09
	$	19.0	$	1719.80	$	3857.0	$	3857.0

SNFGC, STGC and SEGC record the Head Lease costs as a component of advertising, general and administrative costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Seneca Niagara Falls Gaming Corporation

The SNFGC Head Lease (dated October 25, 2002) expires on December 31, 2023 and covers use of the land and certain improvements existing at the commencement of such Head Lease, principally including structures formerly known as the Niagara Falls Convention Center and Lackey Plaza. On August 1, 2008, at the request of the Nation, SGC approved an increase in the SNFGC Head Lease to $3.1 million per month, effective October 1, 2008, and to $3.7 million per month, effective October 1, 2009. On March 19, 2009, SNFGC entered into an amendment to the foregoing Head Lease agreement with the Nation, which reduced payments to $3.0 million per month effective October 1, 2008 and eliminated the increase that would have taken effect as of October 1, 2009.

Seneca Territory Gaming Corporation

The STGC Head Lease (effective as of May 1, 2004) expires on December 31, 2023 and covers use of the land which is currently being used in operating the Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. On August 1, 2008, at the request of the Nation, SGC approved increases in the payments under the STGC Head Lease to $2.1 million per month effective October 1, 2008, and to $2.7 million per month effective October 1, 2009. On March 19, 2009, STGC entered into an amendment to the foregoing Head Lease agreement with the Nation, which reduced payments to $2.0 million per month effective October 1, 2008 and eliminated the increase that would have taken effect as of October 1, 2009.

Table of Contents

Seneca Erie Gaming Corporation

The SEGC Head Lease (effective as of April 1, 2006) expires on December 31, 2023 and covers use of the land which is currently being used in operating the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino. On August 1, 2008, at the request of the Nation, SGC approved an increase in the payments under the SEGC Head Lease to $1.5 million per month effective October 1, 2008 and thereafter. On March 19, 2009, SEGC entered into an amendment to the foregoing Head Lease agreement with the Nation, which reduced payments to $1.3 million per month effective October 1, 2008.

In connection with the March 19, 2009, Head Lease amendments described above, for purposes of compliance with its Indenture governing the Senior Notes and the Distribution Agreement, SGC obtained and delivered to Wells Fargo, N.A. (as trustee under the Indenture governing the Senior Notes) written fair market value rent opinions from an independent financial advisor with regard to the SNFGC and STGC Head Lease amendments (as required by the Indenture). The SEGC Head Lease amendment reflects a 3% per annum (for two years) increase in rent as permitted by the Indenture. SGC also delivered to Wells Fargo, N.A. (as trustee under the indenture governing the Nation’s municipal bonds and a party to the Distribution Agreement) an additional certification required pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. Further or additional increases in rent payable under the Head Lease agreements are restricted under the terms of SGC’s Indenture governing its Senior Notes and the Distribution Agreement, and are subject to compliance with all applicable contractual commitments of SGC and the Nation, such that no increase may contravene, or constitute a default under any agreement, indenture, instrument or other commitment legally binding upon the Nation, SNFGC, STGC or SEGC, respectively, or to which the premises (described in the Head Leases) are subject.

Table of Contents

Indenture). The SEGC Head Lease amendment reflects a 3% per annum (for two years) increase in rent as permitted by the Indenture. SGC also delivered to Wells Fargo, N.A. (as trustee under the indenture governing the Nation’s municipal bonds and a party to the Distribution Agreement) an additional certification required pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. Further or additional increases in rent payable under the Head Lease agreements are restricted under the terms of SGC’s Indenture governing its Senior Notes and the Distribution Agreement, and are subject to compliance with all applicable contractual commitments of SGC and the Nation, such that no increase may contravene, or constitute a default under any agreement, indenture, instrument or other commitment legally binding upon the Nation, SNFGC, STGC or SEGC, respectively, or to which the premises (described in the Head Leases) are subject.

Class II Poker Leases:

As of January 1, 2005, the Company transferred all Class II operations to the Nation, including its poker operations. The Company leases space within Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel to Seneca Gaming and Entertainment, which operates the Nation’s Class II facilities, for operation of the poker room. On November 9, 2009, Seneca Gaming and Entertainment relocated its poker operations in Seneca Allegany Casino to a new facility located within one mile of the Seneca Allegany Casino property. For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, SGC recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of poker room rental income and fees, and for the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, SGC recorded $0.34 million and $0.4 6 million, respectively, of rental income and fees. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and September 30, 2009, SGC recorded $0.24 million and $0.5 million, respectively, as a receivable from the Nation relating to poker room rentals.

Other Related Party Transactions

Construction Services:

SNFGC, STGC, SEGC and ~~SEGC~~LGCC have each entered into construction management agreements ~~with~~ with Seneca Construction Management Corporation, (or SCMC), and SCMC LLC, for ~~certain~~ certain renovations and capital improvements at Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel, Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, ~~and~~ Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, respectively. SCMC and SCMC LLC are wholly owned by the Nation. For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, SNFGC, STGC and SEGC have collectively made payments to SCMC and SCMC LLC for construction management and related fees of $0.3 ~~million~~ and $0.6 2 million, respectively, and for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, SNFGC, STGC and SEGC have collectively made payments to SCMC and SCMC LLC for construction management and related fees of $0.3 million and $1.68 million, respectively. Such fees reflect the amounts earned by SCMC and SCMC LLC for the performance of construction management services related primarily to the recently completed expansion of the Buffalo Creek facility. Additional amounts paid to SCMC and SCMC LLC are passed through and used to pay subcontractors, reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses and similar costs.

~~Regulatory Services:~~14

SGC is charged by the Nation for its costs incurred related to the operation of SGA gaming regulatory services. These include: a) costs incurred solely and directly in connection with regulatory services and oversight of SGC’s gaming operations and which are therefore 100% allocable to SGC; and b) an administration fee, assessed by the Nation for costs indirectly incurred in conjunction with the operation and regulation of SGC, which is fixed as a percentage of direct costs, currently 20%, as determined by the Nation in its performance of administration of the SGA and its oversight of the Company. Such costs were approximately $2.3 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $4.5 million and $5.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

SGC is also charged by the Nation for its costs incurred related to services provided by the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, New York State Police, Seneca Nation of Indians Marshals, Buffalo Police and Cattaraugus County Sheriff Department solely and directly in connection with SGC’s operations, which costs were approximately $2.3 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $6.0 million and $5.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, approximately $38.5 million and $33.7 million, respectively, were recorded as “accrued regulatory costs” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, for the payment of such New York State related regulatory costs. The related expense was recorded as a component of advertising, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

Table of Contents

Regulatory Services:

SGC is charged by the Nation for its costs incurred related to the operation of SGA gaming regulatory services. These include: a) costs incurred solely and directly in connection with regulatory services and oversight of SGC’s gaming operations and which are therefore 100% allocable to SGC; and b) an administration fee, assessed by the Nation for costs indirectly incurred in conjunction with the operation and regulation of SGC, which is fixed as a percentage of direct costs, currently 20%, as determined by the Nation in its performance of administration of the SGA and its oversight of the Company. Such costs were approximately $2.2 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $6.7 million and $7.6 million for the nine months ended June, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

SGC is also charged by the Nation for its costs incurred related to services provided by the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, New York State Police, Seneca Nation of Indians Marshals (through October 1, 2009), Buffalo Police and Cattaraugus County Sheriff Department solely and directly in connection with SGC’s operations, which costs were approximately $2.9 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $8.9 million and $8.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, approximately $40.4 million and $33.7 million, respectively, were recorded as “accrued regulatory costs” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, for the payment of such New York State related regulatory costs. The related expense was recorded as a component of advertising, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Distribution Agreement Obligations

On April 27, 2007, SGC entered into a Distribution Agreement among the Nation, the Seneca Nation of Indians Capital Improvements Authority, or the Authority, SGC and Wells Fargo Bank, as Trustee, in connection with the Authority’s issuance in two series (one tax exempt and the other taxable) of an aggregate principal amount of $159,495,000 special obligation bonds, or the 2007 Nation Bonds. The Distribution Agreement obligates SGC, subject to any contractual restrictions applicable to SGC (including, but not limited to, those contained in the Senior Notes Indenture), to make monthly distributions to the Nation at the times and in the amounts necessary to enable the Authority to pay the debt service on the 2007 Nation Bonds as required under the Authority’s indenture. At the direction of the Nation and the Authority, SGC pays such distributions directly to the Trustee. The Authority’s debt service commenced on June 1, 2007. For the period from June 1, 2007 through November 1, 2007, the Authority’s debt service averaged approximately $0.9 million per month. For the period from December 1, 2007 through June 1, 2008, the Authority’s debt service averaged approximately $1.7 million per month. In June 2008, it was determined that the amortization (debt service) schedule upon which the foregoing $1.7 million monthly payments was made, was incorrect. A corrected amortization schedule was provided and, after giving effect to a resulting credit for amounts overpaid, for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 1, 2023, the Authority’s debt service averages approximately $1.2 million per month. The foregoing debt service averages are based on scheduled payments of interest and principal under the Authority’s indenture and bonds and do not address the effects of any earlier call for redemption, by acceleration or otherwise. The Distribution Agreement provides that neither the Trustee nor the Authority’s bondholders will have any ~~recourse~~ recourse under the Distribution Agreement to any revenues, assets or property of SGC or its subsidiaries should SGC fail to comply with its distribution obligations. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, SGC distributed to the Nation $711.52 million and $710.07 million, respectively, for the Authority’s debt service on the special obligation bonds.

Table of Contents

The Seneca Nation Compact

As part of its Compact, the Nation agrees to contribute to the State of New York a portion of the proceeds from the operation and conduct of each category of Gaming Device (as defined in the Compact) for which exclusivity exists, based on the win of such machines (cash dropped into machines, after payouts but before expenses) and totaled on a cumulative quarterly basis to be adjusted annually at the end of the relevant calendar year. However, beginning in February 2005, the Company began advancing to the Nation on a monthly basis the exclusivity fee due for the prior month. The exclusivity fee to the State of New York for years 1—4 (through December 31, 2006), was 18.0%, payable on an annual basis. Thereafter, the exclusivity fee was 22% for years 5—7 (through December 31, 2009), payable on a semi-annual basis, and is 25.0% for years 8—14 (through December 31, 2016), payable on a quarterly basis.

The following table summarizes the exclusivity fees expense by property:

Three Months Ended

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended

March 31,

June 30,

2010

2009

2010

2009

(Dollars in Thousands)

Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel

1920,~~154~~175

1617,~~625~~617

3555,~~091~~266

3350,~~197~~815

Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel

78,~~330~~176

67,~~593~~515

1321,~~598~~774

1320,~~192~~707

Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino

3,~~084~~670

2,~~243~~397

59,~~449~~119

46,~~153~~549

Total

2932,~~568~~021

2527,~~461~~529

5486,~~138~~159

5078,~~542~~071

Exclusivity fees were recorded as a component of gaming expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Expansion and Development

As described in “Note 1 — Organization and Basis of Presentation,” the Compact provides the Nation with the exclusive right to conduct Class III gaming activities at three sites in the western region of the State of New ~~York. The~~ ~~Company opened its third Class III casino on July 3, 2007 in a temporary facility in Buffalo, New~~ York~~, and commenced construction of a permanent facility later that year~~. ~~The Company also commenced construction in~~

13In August 2008, construction activities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino were suspended indefinitely for reasons including: the economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on available cash, such as payments to the Nation. As of June 30, 2010, construction remained suspended indefinitely. Furthermore, certain planning efforts related to the future expansion of the Seneca Niagara Falls property were suspended for the same reasons. As a result of these circumstances an impairment charge of $107.6 million was recognized during the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $0 and $221,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment. Nonetheless, SGC will continue to explore alternative future expansion and development options.

Table of Contents

April 2008 of a second hotel tower at the Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel.

In August 2008, construction activities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino were suspended indefinitely for reasons including: the economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on available cash, such as payments to the Nation. As of March 31, 2010, construction remained suspended indefinitely. Furthermore, certain planning efforts related to the future expansion of the Seneca Niagara Falls property were suspended for the same reasons. As a result of these circumstances an impairment charge of $107.6 million was recognized during the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an additional $166,000 and $221,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment. Nonetheless, SGC will continue to explore alternative future expansion and development options.

The construction of a permanent casino at the Buffalo Creek site, as well as any expansion by STGC at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel will require significant capital outlays. The ability to recommence these projects will depend on various factors including prevailing economic conditions, cash flow from operations, the availability of external financing with regard to one or more of the projects, certain Nation and governmental approvals, and the effects of legal and/or administrative proceedings.

Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel. In 2006, SNFGC began master planning activities for the remaining approximately 24 acres of undeveloped land contained in the Niagara Falls footprint. During August 2008, these master planning activities were suspended and an impairment charge was recognized related to these activities in the third quarter of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $3.5 million. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an additional $33,000, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. Construction on the next phase of development at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, which was planned to include an additional 200-room hotel tower, and up to 30,000 square feet of additional gaming space and related amenities, for a total estimated cost of approximately $130 million, was suspended and an impairment charge was recognized for costs incurred related to these activities in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $17.1 million. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an adjustment to estimated impairment in the amount of $1,000 and an additional impairment charge of $37,000, respectively, were recognized.16

~~Seneca~~Table ~~Buffalo Creek Casino. Construction on the permanent Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Hotel facility, which was planned to include approximately 90,000 square feet~~ of gaming space; 2,000 slot machines; 45 table games; a 22-story all-suite hotel; four restaurants; a full-service spa and salon; retail and other amenities; and a 2,200-space parking garage, for a total estimated cost of approximately $333 million, was suspended and an impairment charge was recognized related to these activities in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $87.0 million. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an additional $134,000 and $151,000, respectively, were recorded as impairments of property and equipment.Contents

related to these activities in the third quarter of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $3.5 million. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $0 and $33,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. Construction on the next phase of development at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, which was planned to include an additional 200-room hotel tower, and up to 30,000 square feet of additional gaming space and related amenities, for a total estimated cost of approximately $130 million, was suspended and an impairment charge was recognized for costs incurred related to these activities in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $17.1 million. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $0 and $37,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino. Construction on the permanent Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Hotel facility, which was planned to include approximately 90,000 square feet of gaming space; 2,000 slot machines; 45 table games; a 22-story all-suite hotel; four restaurants; a full-service spa and salon; retail and other amenities; and a 2,200-space parking garage, for a total estimated cost of approximately $333 million, was suspended and an impairment charge was recognized related to these activities in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $87.0 million. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $0 and $151,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

On March 5, 2010 SEGC completed an expansion of the existing facility, increasing the number of slot machines to 457 and the total square feet of gaming space to approximately 10,600.

Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club. In July 2007, the Company commenced construction of the Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, anSNFGC’s ~~18-hole~~championship ~~Robert~~level ~~Trent Jones II designed~~ golf course., ~~The golf course is located~~ in Lewiston, New York. ~~and~~It is located approximately ~~ten~~10 miles from the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel. The golf course will serve as an amenity for our patrons and is intended to enable SGC to increase its demographic and geographic reach. Designed by world-renowned golf architect Robert Trent Jones II, Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club ~~will~~currently ~~feature~~features a scenic, par-72, ~~links~~ PGA-style layout and atemporary pro shop. The permanent clubhouse is currently under construction and will feature approximately 4,300 square ~~foot~~feet ~~clubhouse~~of ~~with~~space, including a pro shop, bar and casual dining for 40 patrons. The area around the clubhouse has been designed to accommodate tents and support facilities for large tournaments. The golf course opened isfor ~~scheduled~~public toplay ~~open~~on July 12, 2010. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company has incurred $2324.02 million for the purchase of land and construction, with a total cost to construct the golf course, clubhouse and related amenities estimated to be approximately $25.5 million.

Legal Proceedings

Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Hogen (1:2009-cv-00291 (WDNY)) — CACGEC III

On March 31, 2009, Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County (CACGEC) filed a third action in the United States District Court, Western District of New York against the Chairman of the NIGC, the United States Department of the Interior, the NIGC, the Secretary of the Interior and the President of the United States. The action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the Administrative Procedure Act, the Declaratory Judgments Act, and the IGRA and is principally directed at the decision by the NIGC Chairman, on January 20, 2009, to approve the Seneca Nation’s amendments to its Class III Gaming Ordinance regarding the Nation’s Buffalo Creek Territory. The NIGC Chairman concluded that IGRA’s general prohibition against gaming on lands acquired after its enactment in 1988 does not apply to lands, such as the Buffalo Creek Territory, that are held in restricted fee. The plaintiffs claim that, in approving the Nation’s Class III Gaming ordinance on January 20, 2009, the NIGC Chairman ignored the intention of Congress. The plaintiffs also make several claims that go beyond their prior lawsuits. Most notably, they challenge the constitutionality of the land purchase provisions contained in the Seneca Nation Lands Claim

1417

Table of Contents

~~seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the~~Settlement ~~Administrative Procedure~~ Act, the Declaratory Judgments Act, and the IGRA and is principally directed at the decision by the NIGC Chairman, on January 20, 2009, to approve the Seneca Nation’s amendments to its Class III Gaming Ordinance regarding the Nation’s Buffalo Creek Territory. The NIGC Chairman concluded that IGRA’s general prohibition against gaming on lands acquired after its enactment in 1988 does not apply to lands, such as the Buffalo Creek Territory, that are held in restricted fee. The plaintiffs claim that, in approving the Nation’s Class III Gaming ordinance on January 20, 2009, the NIGC Chairman ignored the intention of Congress. The plaintiffs also make several claims that go beyond their prior lawsuits. Most notably, they challenge the constitutionality of the land purchase provisions contained in the Seneca Nation Lands Claim Settlement Act of 1990 (“SNLCSA”), and attempt to challenge in a more extensive fashion than they had previously the validity of the Nation-State Gaming Compact.

On June 15, 2009, the Nation moved to intervene as a defendant in CACGEC III. The Nation’s proposed intervention and participation as a defendant are expressly restricted to the three claims for relief specified in the plaintiffs’ complaint, namely: (1) whether, as restricted fee lands over which the Nation exerts governmental authority, the Buffalo Creek Territory qualifies as “Indian lands” under IGRA; (2) whether the Buffalo Creek Territory is subject to the general prohibition found in section 2719 of IGRA against gaming on trust lands acquired after IGRA’s effective date even though the Territory consists of restricted fee, rather than trust, lands; and (3) whether, if the Buffalo Creek Territory is subject to Section 2719’s general prohibition, Class III gaming may nevertheless proceed on it because the Buffalo Creek Territory was acquired in settlement of a land claim.

On March 30, 2010, the Court denied the Nation’s motion to intervene, while granting permission for it to participate as amicus curiae. The Court also dismissed certain secondary claims of the plaintiffs in the proceeding, while allowing other core claims regarding the eligibility of the land for casino gaming to proceed. If On May 18, 2010, the Nation filed a notice of interlocutory appeal with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on the issue of its right to intervene. If the plaintiffs ultimately succeed in this action, or in their pending appeals in in the CACGEC I and CACGEC II proceedings (previous suits filed by the ~~plaintiffs~~ plaintiffs and relating to similar claims), the SGC may be unable to conduct ~~any~~ any Class III gaming at its existing properties.

In the matter of the Petition of New York State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation (NYS Supreme Court, Niagara County)

Pursuant to the Compact, the State of New York agreed to assist the Nation in whatever manner appropriate, including through the exercise of its power of eminent domain, to acquire acreage within the approximately 50-acre footprint surrounding the former Niagara Falls Convention Center in the City of Niagara Falls, New York, designated by New York State under the Compact for ownership by the Nation. The amounts paid to condemnees from whom the ESDC has acquired property are deemed to be advance payments, in that property owners are entitled to reserve their rights to challenge the land and improvement values determined by the condemnor’s appraisers.

With respect to approximately 18 acres of land and related fixtures (a former water park) within the above footprint, the ESDC made advanced payments under New York eminent domain procedure law of $18.0 million to Fallsite LLC and Fallsville Splash, LLC, the owners of the water park property. The owners thereafter filed notices of claim seeking, in the aggregate, $40.0 million and $35.0 million for land and trade fixtures, respectively. On April 5, 2010, the New York State Supreme Court determined that no additional compensation was owed to the former property owners for the water park real estate and fixtures. SGC anticipates that the former property owners will appeal the valuation decision. In a related action, on June 21, 2010 the condemnees separately moved to vacate the original 2006 order that vested title to the Splashpark properties in ESDC. The ESDC is vigorously contesting the condemnees’ claims as procedurally improper and substantively without merit. If the claimants are successful, the former Splashpark properties could be returned to the property owners at which point SGC would seek return of the amounts paid for the properties.

Seneca Gaming Corporation v. Harvest Trends, Inc. et al. (NYS Supreme Court, Niagara County)

1518

Table of Contents

customer data, unjust enrichment, unfair competition, breaches of fiduciary duties and duties of loyalty, and breaches of contracts. On July 13, 2010, four of the defendants in the above referenced case filed separate counter-suits against SGC and 20 other parties, including executives and members of SGC’s Board of Directors and personnel employed by the SGA. These suits, brought in the State of New York Supreme Court, County of Niagara, allege defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, product disparagement, unfair competition, tortious interference with prospective business advantage, abuse of process and aiding and abetting these activities. Each of these complaints seeks in excess of $100 million in damages. SGC believes that these actions are without merit, and intends to defend itself against these actions vigorously.

Seneca Niagara Falls Gaming Corporation and Seneca Gaming Corporation v. Toohey, et. al. (NYS Supreme Court, Niagara County)

On April 30, 2010, SNFGC and SGC filed suit in the New York Supreme Court, County of Niagara, against a number of individual defendants (Timothy Toohey, Michael J. Dowd, Bergal Mitchell, Rachel Mitchell, Barry Halftown and Mark Gabriele). SNFGC and SGC subsequently amended their complaint on June 17, 2010. The suit alleges that the defendants, individually and collectively, engaged in fraud with respect to a real estate transaction in which SNFGC purchased land in the Town of Lewiston, New York, for the development of its Seneca Hickory Stick golf course. The suit also alleges that Bergal Mitchell, who had at the pertinent times been a member of the Board of Directors of SNFGC and SGC, breached his fiduciary duties by failing to disclose and concealing certain material information with respect to the transaction. The suit also asserts aiding and abetting claims against various defendants, both with respect to fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims. SGC and SNFGC are suing for compensatory and punitive damages. Several of the defendants have answered the complaint, while others have moved or stated their intention to move to dismiss.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the section titled “Financial Statements” and the accompanying “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. References below to years are to fiscal years of Seneca Gaming Corporation, or SGC, unless otherwise noted. SGC’s fiscal year is from October 1 through September 30.

Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, in our press releases or in our other public communications, the words “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “contemplate,” “may,” “will,” “plan,” “project,” “will continue,” “will be,” “will continue,” “likely will result” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Similarly, statements that ~~describe~~ describe our plans, business, strategy or goals are all forward-looking statements. Statements looking forward in time are included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to ~~differ~~ differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the risk factors contained or referenced herein and in our other reports filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, or the 2009 Form 10-K. In addition to the risk factors described in Item 1A of our 2009 Form 10-K, the following important factors, among others, could affect our future financial condition or results of operations, causing actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements: the local, regional, national, or global economic climate, our substantial indebtedness and ability to meet our financial obligations and operate in accordance with the restrictions pursuant to such indebtedness, our incurrence of any additional indebtedness, the availability of financing, our failure to generate cash flows, increased competition, changes in federal Indian law, issues relating to the Nation-State Gaming Compact, or the Compact, between the Seneca Nation of Indians and New York State, the control of our company by the Seneca Nation of Indians, or the Nation, changes in the membership of the Nation’s Council (the Nation’s legislative body) or Nation policies, changes in gaming laws or regulations, ongoing or future litigation challenging our ability to conduct gaming operations, changes in federal or state tax laws or the administration of such laws, our failure to retain existing management, fill current vacancies, and attract new personnel, our limited experience operating casinos, hotels, and the ~~golf~~recently ~~course~~opened wegolf ~~intend to open~~course, seasonality and weather-related factors, investigative reviews by regulatory authorities relating to our gaming revenues, and acts of war or terrorism.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their respective dates. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after their respective dates.

Overview

SGC is wholly-owned by the Nation and chartered to develop, manage and direct all of the Nation’s Class III gaming operations on the Nation’s territories in Western New York. SGC was chartered by the Nation in August 2002. In August 2002, the Nation entered into the Compact with New York State that provides the Nation with the right to establish and operate three Class III gaming facilities in Western New York. Class III gaming, the most heavily regulated of the gaming classes includes, among other things, slot machines and table games. We currently operate three Class III gaming facilities in Western New York—Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel, which is located in the City of Niagara Falls, New York (Niagara Territory) and operated by Seneca Niagara Falls Gaming Corporation, or SNFGC, approximately 20 miles north of Buffalo, New York; Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, which is located in the City of Salamanca, New York (Allegany Territory) and operated by Seneca Territory Gaming Corporation, or STGC, approximately 75 miles northeast of Erie, Pennsylvania; and Seneca Buffalo ~~Creek Casino, which~~ ~~is located in the inner harbor district of Buffalo, New York (Buffalo~~ Creek ~~Territory)~~ ~~and operated by Seneca Erie Gaming Corporation, or SEGC. Seneca Niagara~~ Casino ~~and Hotel opened on December 31~~, 2002 (initially, as the Seneca Niagara Casino). Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel opened on May 1, 2004 (initially, as the Seneca Allegany Casino). Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino commenced operations on July 3, 2007. Our three casinos are located on land held in restricted fee by the Nation, which, ~~together~~is with the rights under the Compact, allows us to conduct Class III gaming operations at these locations in New York State and are the only casino resort gaming facilities in Western New York State to offer both Class III slot machines and table games.

1620

Table of Contents

located in the inner harbor district of Buffalo, New York (Buffalo Creek Territory) and operated by Seneca Erie Gaming Corporation, or SEGC. Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel opened on December 31, 2002 (initially, as the Seneca Niagara Casino). Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel opened on May 1, 2004 (initially, as the Seneca Allegany Casino). Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino commenced operations on July 3, 2007. Our three casinos are located on land held in restricted fee by the Nation, which, together with the rights under the Compact, allows us to conduct Class III gaming operations at these locations in New York State and are the only casino resort gaming facilities in Western New York State to offer both Class III slot machines and table games.

Executive Summary

Our Current Operations. We currently operate three Class III ~~gaming~~ gaming facilities: Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel, in the City of Niagara Falls, New York (Niagara Territory), featuring over 147,000 square feet of gaming space, 43,~~037~~973 slot machines, 102 table games and 604 hotel rooms; Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, in the City of Salamanca, New York (Allegany Territory), featuring over 63,500 square feet of gaming space, 2,~~171~~144 slot machines, 3233 table games and 212 hotel rooms; and the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino (slots only facility), in the City of Buffalo, New York (Buffalo Creek Territory), featuring ~~457~~approximately 10,600 square feet of gaming space and 457 slot machines. Certain of these operations also include dining, entertainment, retail and spa and salon services. For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, approximately ~~93% and~~ 92%, ~~respectively,~~ of our net revenue was derived from our gaming activities.

Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel. Upon opening on December 31, 2002, Seneca Niagara Casino primarily relied on drive-in and bus patrons from the Buffalo, Niagara Falls and Rochester areas in New York and secondarily from Erie, Pennsylvania, Ohio and other parts of New York.

In March 2006, SNFGC ~~officially~~ completed the phased opening of its luxury hotel expansion, which included a permanent 147,000 square foot gaming facility (providing 35,000 square feet more gaming space than the original 112,000 square feet), a 604-room luxury hotel with 118 suites of various sizes, a full-service spa, salon, and fitness center, three fine dining restaurants and a 24-hour casual restaurant, three retail stores, and a 24,000 square foot multi-purpose room and events center. The expansion of Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel, including the addition of our luxury hotel and other amenities, has enabled us to attract higher-end patrons, increase length of stay, and extend our geographic market penetration and appeal to a more diverse ~~demographic~~ demographic base.

In 2006, we began master planning activities for the ~~remaining~~ remaining approximately 24 acres of undeveloped land contained in the approximately 50 acre Niagara Falls footprint described in the Compact for ownership by the Nation. During August 2008, these master planning activities were suspended due to the then prevailing economic conditions and adverse credit market conditions. An impairment charge of $3.5 million ~~was~~ was recognized during the third quarter of Fiscal 2009 related to these activities. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, an additional $0 and $33,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. Since opening on May 1, 2004, Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel has attracted patrons from the southern portion of Western New York, Erie and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Ohio. As of ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010, approximately 69% of the casino’s patron base is from outside of the State of New York.

In March 2007, we opened a 212-room resort hotel, including two fine dining restaurants, a 24-hour casual restaurant and certain other amenities after officially opening the new permanent gaming floor in December 2006. In March 2008, we completed the conversion of the former approximate 120,000 square foot temporary casino structure into an events center with a seating capacity for 2,200 people, along with additional administrative office space and amenities. We believe the resort hotel, casino and events center provide a first-class gaming experience for our patrons, encouraging longer patron length of stay and helping to maintain the competitive position of the facility in light of our closest and most immediate ~~competition~~ in Pennsylvania, Presque Isle Downs, in Erie, Pennsylvania approximately 80 miles from the Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. Presque Isle Downs has approximately 2,000 slot machines and offers dining and entertainment options that include a steakhouse, a buffet and four lounges, but it does not offer table games or lodging.

Construction on our next phase of development at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, which was planned to include an additional 200 room hotel tower, and up to 30,000 square feet of additional gaming space and related amenities, for a total estimated cost of up to $130 million, was suspended for reasons including: the economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on our available cash, such as our payments and distributions to the Nation. As of March 31, 2010, construction remained suspended indefinitely. As a result of these circumstances, an impairment charge was recognized related to these activities in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $17.1 million. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an adjustment to estimated impairment in the amount of $1,000 and an additional impairment charge of $37,000, respectively, were recognized.21

Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino. On October 3, 2005, the Nation acquired approximately nine acres of land in the inner-harbor district of Buffalo, New York. On July 3, 2007, we began operating a temporary Class III gaming facility (approximately 6,000 square feet) featuring 135 slot machines and a snack bar. During the quarter ended

Table of Contents

~~March 31~~competition, ~~2008, that~~ ~~facility~~Presque ~~was~~Isle ~~expanded~~Downs, toin ~~include~~Erie, anPennsylvania ~~additional~~(approximately ~~109~~80 ~~slot~~miles ~~machines.~~from ~~During~~ the ~~quarter~~Seneca ~~ended~~Allegany ~~March 31,~~Casino ~~2010,~~and ~~the~~Hotel). Presque ~~existing~~Isle ~~facility~~Downs ~~was~~has ~~expanded to~~approximately ~~include an additional 4~~2,~~600~~000 ~~square~~slot ~~feet~~machines ofand ~~gaming~~48 ~~space~~table games and anoffers ~~additional~~dining ~~213~~and entertainment ~~slot~~options ~~machines.~~that ~~The~~include ~~current~~a ~~facility has approximately 10~~steakhouse,~~600~~ ~~square~~a ~~feet~~buffet ~~of gaming space,~~ and ~~features~~four ~~457~~lounges, ~~slot~~but ~~machines~~it ~~and~~does anot offer ~~snack bar~~lodging.

Construction on our next phase of development at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, which was planned to include an additional 200 room hotel tower, and up to 30,000 square feet of additional gaming space and related amenities, for a total estimated cost of up to $130 million, was suspended for reasons including: the economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on our available cash, such as our payments and distributions to the Nation. As of June 30, 2010, construction remained suspended indefinitely. As a result of these circumstances, an impairment charge was recognized related to these activities in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $17.1 million. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $0 and $37,000, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino. On October 3, 2005, the Nation acquired approximately nine acres of land in the inner-harbor district of Buffalo, New York. On July 3, 2007, we began operating a temporary Class III gaming facility (approximately 6,000 square feet) featuring 135 slot machines and a snack bar. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, that facility was expanded to include an additional 109 slot machines. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the existing facility was further expanded to include an additional 4,600 square feet of gaming space and an additional 213 slot machines. The current facility has approximately 10,600 square feet of gaming space, and features 457 slot machines and a snack bar.

On October 3, 2007, we formally announced our plans for a permanent casino and hotel complex on the Buffalo Creek Territory having an estimated cost of $333 million, featuring approximately 90,000 square feet of gaming space; 2,000 slot machines; 45 table games; a 22-story all suite hotel; four restaurants; a full-service spa and salon; retail and other amenities; and a 2,200-space parking garage.

We suspended construction on the permanent Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Hotel in August 2008 for reasons including: the economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on our available cash, such as our payments to the Nation. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, construction remained suspended indefinitely. As a result of these circumstances an impairment charge was recognized related to these activities in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009, in the amount of approximately $87.0 million. During the three and nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, an additional $~~134,000~~0 and $151,000, respectively, ~~were~~was recorded as ~~impairments~~an impairment of property and equipment.

Our ability to continue to operate the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino facility will depend on various factors, including existing legal challenges. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings,” included in our 2009 Form 10-K for a description of the legal proceedings relating to the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino.

Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club — Lewiston, New York. In March 2006, we acquired 257 acres of land with the intent to design and build athe Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, SNFGC’s championship level golf course, in Lewiston, New York,. It is located approximately ~~ten~~10 miles from the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel in the Town of Lewiston. The golf course will serve as an amenity for our patrons intended to enable SGC to increase its demographic and geographic reach. Designed by world-renowned golf architect Robert Trent Jones II, Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club ~~will~~currently ~~feature~~features a scenic, par-72, ~~links~~ PGA-style layout and atemporary pro shop. The permanent clubhouse is currently under construction and will feature approximately 4,300 square ~~foot~~feet ~~clubhouse~~of ~~with~~space, including a pro shop, bar and casual dining for 40 patrons. The area around the clubhouse has been designed to accommodate tents and support facilities for large tournaments. WeThe ~~selected the Robert Trent Jones II firm to design the~~ golf course~~. Construction~~ ofopened ~~the~~for public ~~golf~~play ~~course~~on ~~commenced in~~ July ~~2007 and the golf course is scheduled to open July 1~~2, 2010. LGCC has engaged Kemper Sports Management, Inc. to manage and operate the course. The total cost to construct the golf course, clubhouse and related amenities is estimated to be approximately $25.5 million.

Table of Contents

Key Performance Indicators. Our operating results are dependent on the volume of patrons at our casinos, our ability to attract patrons for repeat visits and our ability to increase patron revenue per trip.

Marketing. We use an integrated marketing strategy to attract and retain our patrons and to brand the Seneca name. We coordinate our marketing events to maximize the quality and length of stay of patron visits and to minimize competition among our gaming facilities. The luxury hotel and related amenities at the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel and the resort hotel and related amenities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel further enhance our marketing initiatives in the region, including areas of New York outside of the Niagara Falls and Salamanca areas, in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Toronto, Canada and in areas outside the region including Michigan, Massachusetts, and Connecticut.

Seasonality. We have generally observed seasonal increases in gaming activity during the spring and summer months and decreases in gaming activity during winter months associated with inclement weather.

Overall Outlook. SGC’s financial performance during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 continues ~~reflects~~to ~~continued~~reflect ~~demonstration~~positively ofon the company’s ~~ability~~ efforts to effectively manage its operations and financial performance in an uncertain economic environment.

For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, operating income was $2333.87 million, a ~~12.7%, or~~ $3107.5 0 million, ~~decrease~~increase when compared to an operating ~~income~~loss of $2773.3 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. This ~~decrease~~increase isresults principally afrom ~~result~~the effects of athe $3109.50 million impairment charge recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2009. A $3.8 million increase in exclusivity fees payable to New York State from 22% to 25%, when comparing the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 to the three months ended June 30, ~~March~~2009, 31slightly offset this increase. Additionally, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, net revenues increased 1.9% when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009.

SGC has also increased cash, ~~and~~ cash equivalents and restricted cash from $9183.2 million as of ~~December~~September 3130, 2009 to $~~111~~116.39 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, $1525.95 million of cash reserves for future repayment of outstanding debt, and/or fees associated with the refinancing thereof, is included in the restricted cash balance reported on the consolidated balance sheets, pursuant to a resolution approved by the Board of Directors, in part, seeking to fund a $125.0 million reserve prior to May 2012 to reduce its outstanding debt and thereby, its future borrowing costs.

Table of Contents

SGC continues to believe that it is the premier gaming operator in Western New York State and in the areas of Northern Pennsylvania and Ohio located within its primary and secondary markets. Since the December 31, 2002 opening of the Seneca Niagara Casino, SGC has invested significantly in the development, expansion and maintenance of its gaming facilities, including the completion of the hotel and gaming expansion projects at Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel and Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, and the opening and expansion of the casino on the Seneca Buffalo Creek Territory. These investments have helped enable SGC to maintain its position as the premier gaming operator in the region described above. To help maintain its current market position, and to provide for expanded opportunities in the convention and tourism markets, SGC intends to continue to explore opportunities for its Niagara Falls, Allegany and Buffalo facilities, subject to the availability of necessary funding. A principal goal is for the facilities to complement each other, offering diverse hotel, entertainment and gaming experiences for our guests.

SGC’s senior management, Board of Directors and its owner, the Nation, monitor and review our financial condition and liquidity needs to help ensure appropriate operating, financial and strategic plans meet ongoing economic challenges and address our ongoing liquidity requirements.

Recent Developments. On October 19, 2009, we broke ground on an expansion of the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino which added approximately 4,600 square feet of gaming space to the existing facility and 213 slot machines. The expansion was opened on March 5, 2010.

Also, during the six months ended March 31, 2010, 577 new slot machines were installed at the Niagara Falls and Allegany properties furthering our goal of providing the best and newest entertainment experiences for our patrons.23

~~Effective December 18,~~Table 2009, SGC amended its $50.0 million Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date from December 19, 2009 to December 31, 2011. Amounts borrowed under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to bear interest at either one, three or six-month LIBOR plus one and one quarter percent (1.25%), or the prime rate (as reported in The Wall Street Journal) plus one quarter percent (0.25%), with any outstanding principal balance to be paid by, or on, the new maturity date. The $50.0 million commitment under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement reduces in tandem with any reduction in the letter of credit requirement imposed by the Empire State Development Corporation, or ESDC (relating to the ESDC’s efforts on behalf of SGC in connection with ongoing condemnation proceedings in Niagara Falls, New York), up to an aggregate reduction of $10.0 million. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement modifies certain of the financial covenants contained in the Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement, including reducing the minimum consolidated EBITDA covenant from $160 million to $145 million (on a rolling 12 month basis) as well as modifying the total leverage ratio (of total funded debt to EBITDA) to a limit of 3.5 to 1.0.Contents

~~On January 11~~Also, ~~2010,~~ ~~the~~during ~~Seneca Gaming Corporation’s Board of Directors appointed Kevin Seneca as~~ the ~~new~~nine ~~Chairman~~months ofended ~~the~~June 30, ~~Board~~2010, ~~and~~685 ~~voted~~new toslot ~~appoint~~machines ~~Richard K. Nephew to fill~~were ~~the~~installed ~~vacancy~~at in the ~~office~~Niagara ofFalls ~~Treasurer created by Mr. Seneca’s appointment. Each will serve in their respective capacities until the Board’s next annual meeting, until their successors are elected, or appointed~~ and ~~qualified,~~Allegany orproperties ~~until~~furthering ~~their~~our ~~earlier resignation~~goal ~~or removal. The appointments did not affect the composition~~ of ~~the~~ ~~Board,~~providing ~~and~~ the ~~Directors~~best ~~each~~and ~~continue~~newest toentertainment ~~serve~~experiences ~~on the Board~~ for ~~their respective~~our ~~terms as designated by the Nation’s Council~~patrons.

~~In January~~Effective December ~~2010~~18, ~~Pennsylvania~~2009, ~~approved~~SGC amended its $50.0 million Senior Secured Revolving ~~legislation~~Loan ~~allowing~~Agreement ~~racinos~~to ~~and~~extend ~~standalone~~the ~~slot~~maturity ~~facilities~~date from December 19, 2009 to December 31, ~~operate~~2011. upAmounts borrowed under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to bear interest at either one, three or ~~250~~six-month ~~tables~~LIBOR ~~per~~plus ~~facility~~one ~~after~~and ~~paying~~one aquarter ~~license~~percent ~~fee~~(1.25%), ofor the prime rate (as reported in The Wall Street Journal) plus one quarter percent (0.25%), with any outstanding principal balance to be paid by, or on, the new maturity date. The $1650.50 million. ~~Smaller~~commitment under the Amended Senior Secured ~~resort~~Revolving ~~casinos~~Loan ~~can~~Agreement ~~obtain~~reduces ~~approval~~in tandem with any reduction in the letter of credit requirement imposed by the Empire State Development Corporation, or ESDC (relating to ~~operate~~the ESDC’s efforts on behalf of SGC in connection with ongoing condemnation proceedings in Niagara Falls, New York), up to 50an ~~tables~~aggregate reduction ~~per~~of ~~facility~~$10.0 ~~for~~million. As of June 30, 2010, the commitment was areduced to $749.52 million ~~license~~in ~~fee~~accordance with this provision. In ~~addition~~The Amended Senior toSecured Revolving Loan Agreement modifies certain of the ~~upfront~~financial ~~license~~covenants contained ~~fee~~in the Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement, including reducing the ~~facilities~~minimum ~~are~~consolidated ~~required~~EBITDA covenant from $160 million to ~~pay~~$145 million (on a ~~tax~~rolling of12 ~~16%~~month ~~of gross~~basis) ~~revenues~~as ~~from~~well as modifying the ~~games,~~total ~~which~~leverage ~~will~~ratio ~~drop~~(of total funded debt to ~~14%~~EBITDA) ~~after~~to ~~two~~a ~~years~~limit of 3.5 to 1.0.

~~In late April~~On June 16, 2010, ~~Presque~~the ~~Isle Downs~~Seneca ~~(in~~Gaming ~~Erie,~~Corporation’s ~~PA)~~Board ~~obtained~~of ~~approval~~Directors held its annual meeting and acted to ~~operate~~reappoint 48Kevin ~~table~~Seneca ~~games,~~as ~~while~~the Chairman of the ~~Meadows~~Board, ~~Racetrack~~ and ~~Casino~~to formally appoint Richard K. Nephew as Audit Committee Chairman (~~outside~~who ofhad ~~Pittsburgh,~~been ~~PA)~~serving ~~obtained~~as ~~approval~~the toActing Chairman). ~~operate~~Other aofficer ~~total~~appointments ofincluded 42Karen ~~banking~~Karsten, ~~games~~Vice (eChair, Richard K.g Nephew, Treasurer and Ina Locke, Secretary. Each will serve in their respective capacities until the Board’s next annual meeting, ~~blackjack~~until their successors are elected, ~~craps~~or appointed and qualified, ~~roulette)~~or inuntil their earlier ~~addition~~resignation or removal. The officer appointments did not affect the composition of the Board, and the Directors each continue to 20serve ~~poker~~on ~~tables~~the Board for their respective terms as designated by the Nation’s Council.

In July 2010, nine Pennsylvania casinos offered table games for the first time in that state. In western Pennsylvania, The Rivers Casino, Meadows Racetrack and Casino and Presque Isle Downs unveiled 85, 68 and 48 table games, respectively. In central Pennsylvania, Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, Mount Airy Resort Casino in the Poconos and Hollywood Casino opened 62, 72 and 52 table games, respectively. In eastern Pennsylvania, Parx Casino, Harrah’s Chester Casino and Racetrack and Sands Bethlehem opened 57, 74 and 89 table games, respectively.

On July 12, 2010, SGC entered into an amended and restated Employment Agreement with Catherine A. Walker, pursuant to which Ms. Walker agreed to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of SGC and its subsidiaries for a period of five years. Ms. Walker had served as Chief Operating Officer since March 16, 2008, and was the principal executive officer of SGC until her most recent appointment as President and CEO.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no changes in critical accounting policies and estimates since the filing of our 2009 Form 10-K.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

19Operating Results - Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009

Table of Contents

Operating Results - Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

Summary of Operating Results

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we own and operate the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel in Niagara Falls, New York; the Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel in Salamanca, New York; and the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino in Buffalo, New York. In addition, Lewiston Golf Course Corporation was established to operate a golf course which ~~is currently~~opened ~~under~~July 2, ~~construction~~2010, in Lewiston, New York. All of our revenues are derived from our operations at our completed facilities.

The following table summarizes our results from operations by corporation and/or facility:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Net revenues:
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	9297,~~515~~899		$	9398,~~954~~591
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	3438,~~098~~956			3539,~~692~~338
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	1214,~~607~~991			1011,~~392~~103
Total	$	~~139~~151,~~220~~846		$	~~140~~149,~~038~~032
Operating expenses:
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	71,~~247~~358		$	6971,~~300~~942
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	3435,~~431~~799			3554,~~322~~104
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	9,~~073~~666			795,~~410~~391
Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club	9284			5396
Seneca Gaming Corporation	~~622~~1,034			~~657~~766
Total	$	~~115~~118,~~382~~141		$	~~112~~222,~~742~~299
Operating income (loss):
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	2126,~~268~~541		$	2426,~~654~~649
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	~~(333~~3,157		)	~~370~~(14,766		)
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	35,~~534~~325			2(84,~~982~~288		)
Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club	(9284		)	(5396		)
Seneca Gaming Corporation	(~~622~~1,034		)	(~~657~~766		)
Total	$	2333,~~838~~705		$	27(73,~~296~~267	)

The most important factors or trends contributing to our operating performance during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 were:

· A Expansion 3%of ~~increase in~~ the ~~exclusivity~~Buffalo ~~fee~~Creek ~~payable to New~~facility, ~~York~~which ~~State,~~opened ~~beginning~~in ~~January~~March 1, 2010, ~~from 22%~~ to ~~25%~~approximately ~~which~~10,600 ~~resulted~~square infeet ~~a $3.5 million increase to our operating expenses during the quarter ($2.3 million~~ of ~~the increase is attributable to Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and~~gaming ~~Hotel,~~space ~~$0.8 million is attributable to Seneca Allegany Casino~~ and ~~Hotel,~~a ~~and $0.4~~total ~~million~~of is457 ~~attributable~~slot ~~to Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino)~~machines;

· ~~The~~ Capital ~~national~~investment ~~recession~~in approximately 108 slot machines, 20 at Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and ~~resulting~~Hotel and 88 at Seneca Allegany ~~impact~~Casino onand ~~discretionary~~Hotel, ~~consumer~~introducing ~~spending~~new gaming content to our gaming floors;

· ~~Extension~~ A of3% ~~hours~~increase ofin ~~operation~~the ofexclusivity ~~the~~fee payable ~~Seneca~~to ~~Buffalo~~New ~~Creek~~York ~~facility~~State, ~~effective~~beginning ~~February~~January ~~2009~~1, ~~and~~2010, ~~subsequent expansion~~from of22% ~~the~~to ~~Buffalo~~25% ~~Creek~~which resulted ~~facility,~~in ~~which~~a ~~opened~~$3.8 inmillion ~~March 2010,~~increase to ~~approximately~~ ~~10,600~~our ~~square~~operating ~~feet~~expenses during the quarter ($2.4 million of ~~gaming~~the ~~space~~increase ~~and~~is aattributable ~~total~~to ofSeneca ~~457~~Niagara ~~slot~~Falls ~~machines;~~Casino and Hotel, $1.0 million

~~· Relatively temperate weather during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009; and~~25

· Capital investment in 577 slot machines, 401 at Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel and 176 at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, introducing new gaming content to our gaming floors.

Table of Contents

is attributable to Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, and $0.4 million is attributable to Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino); and

· The ongoing economic recession and resulting impact on discretionary consumer spending.

Gross Revenues

Gross revenues consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Gaming	$	~~128~~139,~~904~~932	$	~~128~~137,~~452~~175
Food and beverage	1314,~~574~~508		14,~~231~~739
Lodging	46,~~640~~389		5,~~577~~928
Retail, entertainment and other	5,~~066~~842		5,~~825~~353
Total	$	~~152~~166,~~184~~671	$	~~154~~163,~~085~~195

The table below summarizes the percentage of gross revenues from each revenue source:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
Gaming	84.70	%	8384.41	%
Food and beverage	8.97	%	9.20	%
Lodging	3.18	%	3.6	%
Retail, entertainment and other	3.35	%	3.83	%
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%

Gaming Revenue

Our gaming revenue for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 increased from $~~128~~137.52 million to $~~128~~139.9 million when compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the expansion of the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino, partially offset by the ongoing impact of adverse economic conditions on consumer demand for gaming and entertainment offerings.

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel’s net gaming revenue decreased $0.75 million, or 1%; Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel’s net gaming revenue decreased $1.0.5 million, or 31%; and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino’s net gaming revenue increased $23.17 million, or 2135% when comparing these same periods.

Revenues from slot machines are the largest component of our gaming revenues. The following table presents data related to slot revenues (in thousands, except where noted):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010			2009
Slot handle	$	1,506,117		$	1,520,560
Gross slot revenue	$	118,768		$	116,715
Net slot revenue	$	116,642		$	113,885
Free promotional slot plays (1)	$	9,872		$	12,867
Weighted average number of slot machines (in units)	6,517			6,664
Gross slot hold percentage	7.9		%	7.7		%
Gross slot win per unit per day (in dollars)	$	202		$	195

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Slot handle	$	1,637,391		$	1,616,272
Gross slot revenue	$	128,626		$	126,019
Net slot revenue	$	126,598		$	122,711
Free promotional slot plays (1)	$	12,356		$	15,986
Weighted average number of slot machines (in units)	6,624			6,653
Gross slot hold percentage	7.9		%	7.8		%
Gross slot win per unit per day (in dollars)	$	213		$	208

(1) Free promotional slot plays are included in slot handle, but not reflected in slot revenues.

Net slot revenue increased $23.89 million, or 23%, when comparing the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, primarily due to the factors ~~previously~~ discussed above.

The following table presents data related to table game revenues (in thousands, except where noted):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Table games drop	$	90,799		$	91,845
Net table games revenue	$	13,264		$	14,345
Weighted average number of table games (in units)	134			145
Table games hold percentage	14.7		%	15.2		%
Gross table games revenue per unit per day (in dollars)	$	1,094		$	1,056

~~Table~~Net table games revenue decreased $1.0 million, or 8%, when comparing the three months ended June 30, 2010 to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was principally due to decreases in the average number of ~~Contents~~table games and the table games hold percentage, coupled with the economic and related factors previously noted, when comparing these same periods.

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010			2009
Table games drop	$	82,214		$	90,649
Net table games revenue	$	12,175		$	14,455
Weighted average number of table games (in units)	134			143
Table games hold percentage	14.7		%	16.0		%
Gross table games revenue per unit per day (in dollars)	$	1,006		$	1,130

Net table games revenue decreased $2.3 million, or 16%, when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2010 to the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was principally due to the economic and related factors previously noted, coupled with decreases in the average number of table games and the table games hold percentage when comparing these same periods.

Food and Beverage Revenue

The following table presents data related to food and beverage revenue (in thousands, except where noted):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
Covers	~~933~~977		~~956~~1,013
Average check (in dollars)	$	14.5485	$	14.8855

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our consolidated food and beverage revenue decreased $0.72 million, or 52% when compared to the same period in 2009, due primarily to the ongoing economic conditions causing a decrease in overall consumer spending for leisure and entertainment purposes. Seneca ~~Niagara Casino and Hotel’s food and beverage revenue accounted for $0.1 million of the decrease; Seneca~~ Allegany Casino and Hotel’s and food and beverage revenue accounted for ~~$0.6~~substantially all ~~million~~ of the decrease~~; and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino’s food and beverage revenue approximated the revenue for the same quarter in the prior year~~. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, 5350% and 52%, respectively, of our food and beverage revenue were the result of Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

Table of Contents

Lodging Revenue

The following table presents data related to lodging revenue:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Occupied rooms	6271,~~983~~689			6871,~~946~~603
Average daily room rate (ADR)	$	7389.6713		$	8082.8878
Occupancy rate	8997.1		%	9496.57		%
Revenue per available room (REVPAR)	$	6586.6156		$	7680.4407

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our lodging revenue ~~decreased~~increased by $0.95 million, or 17 8%, when compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, due primarily to ~~a decrease~~increases in the ~~number of occupied rooms and~~ average rate per occupied room ~~resulting~~ ~~from~~and ~~ongoing~~the number ~~economic~~of ~~conditions~~occupied rooms. Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel’s lodging revenue accounted for $0.84 million of the ~~decrease~~increase and Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel’s lodging revenue accounted for $0.1 million of the ~~decrease~~ increase. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, 8182% and 7975%, respectively, of our lodging revenue were the result of Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

Retail, Entertainment and Other Revenue

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our retail revenue ~~approximated~~increased ~~that~~by ~~from~~$0.3 million, or 10%, when compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel’s retail revenue accounted for substantially all of this increase, due primarily to the February 2010 opening of its newest retail outlet, “Ten”, which features various pieces of merchandise, each for the retail price of ten dollars. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, 7170% and 7772%, respectively, of our retail revenue was attributable to Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our entertainment revenue ~~decreased~~increased $0.51 million, or 4117%, when compared to the same period in 2009. ~~Seneca~~A decrease in Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel’s entertainment revenue ~~accounted~~of ~~for~~$0.1 million was offset by an increase in Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel’s entertainment revenue of $0.42 million. The increase in average ticket price at the Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel (as shown in the table, below) is primarily due to the limited number of shows offered in the three months ended June 30, 2009, featuring lesser known headline entertainers. During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, 59% and 52% of our entertainment revenue, respectively, was attributable to Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

22The following table presents data related to entertainment revenue:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010						2009
	SNFGC			STGC			SNFGC			STGC
Number of shows	16			5			10			2
Number of tickets sold	11,565			7,901			12,809			3,534
Occupancy percentage	76		%	66		%	85		%	74		%
Average ticket price	$	47.36		$	42.65		$	53.50		$	19.85

During the three months ended June 30, 2010, other revenue increased $0.1 million, or 5%, when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

million of the decrease due to an entertainment product mix including more shows in the Bear’s Den (a smaller venue compared to the Seneca Niagara Events Center) during the three months ended March 31, 2010, coupled with lower average ticket prices, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel’s entertainment revenue accounted for $0.1 million of the decrease. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 58% and 41% of our entertainment revenue, respectively, was attributable to Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, other revenue decreased $0.3 million, or 13%, when compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to the impact of non-recurring negotiated supplier refunds received during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Promotional Allowances

SGC operates a complimentary program in which food and beverage, retail, entertainment, and other services are provided to patrons based on points earned through the Seneca Link Player’s Card. The retail value of these complimentary items is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances to arrive at net revenues.

The retail value of providing such promotional allowances was included in revenues as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Food and beverage	7,~~175~~212		7,~~393~~640
Lodging	35,~~755~~246		4,~~417~~432
Retail, entertainment and other	2,~~034~~367		2,~~237~~091
Total	$	1214,~~964~~825	$	14,~~047~~163

The estimated cost of providing such promotional allowances was as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Food and beverage	$	5,~~386~~201	$	5,~~418~~586
Lodging	2,~~293~~331		2,~~354~~245
Retail, entertainment and other	1,~~625~~790		1,~~825~~851
Total	$	9,~~304~~322	$	9,~~597~~682

Promotional allowances as a percentage of gaming revenue were 10.16% and 10.93% during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Promotional allowances ~~decreased~~increased $10.1 7 million, or 85%, when comparing the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 to the same period in 2009. As shown in the table above, ~~food and beverage,~~ lodging, and retail, entertainment and other promotional allowances ~~decreased~~ increased $0.2 8 million, and $0.73 million, respectively, while food and beverage promotional allowances decreased $0.24 million~~, respectively~~.

Detailed Operating Expense Information

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Operating expenses:
Gaming	$	4243,~~487~~913	$	3638,~~424~~884
Food and beverage	10,~~488~~736		1011,~~697~~126
Lodging	2,~~866~~896		3,~~128~~084
Retail, entertainment and other	3,~~215~~325		3,~~467~~307
Advertising, general and administrative	45,~~095~~875		4645,~~365~~084
Pre-opening costs	20286		78110
Depreciation	11,~~045~~110		1211,~~583~~668
Impairment of property and equipment	~~166~~—		¾109,036
Total operating expenses	$	~~115~~118,~~382~~141	$	~~112~~222,~~742~~299

2329

Table of Contents

Gaming Expenses

Gaming expenses principally consist of costs incurred from operating our table games and slot machines, of which the primary components are payroll and payroll related costs and the slot exclusivity fee paid to New York State pursuant to the Compact.

The following table summarizes the exclusivity fees expense by property:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	1920,~~154~~175	$	1617,~~625~~617
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	78,~~330~~176		67,~~593~~515
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	3,~~084~~670		2,~~243~~397
Total	$	2932,~~568~~021	$	2527,~~461~~529

The slot exclusivity fee increased $4.15 million, from $2527.5 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 to $2932.60 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, due primarily to a 3% increase in the exclusivity fee percentage which became effective January 1, 2010, and resulted in a $3.5 8 million increase during the quarter, compared to the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2009. Gaming expenses as a percentage of gross ~~gaming~~ gaming revenues were 3031.64% and 2528.83% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gaming expenses prior to exclusivity fees expense, as a percentage of gross gaming revenues were 108.05% and 8.53% for those same periods.

Food and Beverage Expenses

Food and beverage expenses represent those costs incurred for the operation of our restaurants, snack bars and beverage outlets. The primary components of these expenses are the cost of food and beverage products and payroll and payroll related expenses for team members providing the service. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, food and beverage costs decreased $0.24 million, or 24%, when compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to lower volumes, reflected as a decrease in covers (as ~~discussed~~indicated above under “Food and Beverage Revenue”). Food and beverage expenses as a percentage of food and beverage revenues were 7774.30% and 75.25% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Lodging Expenses

Lodging ~~expenses~~ expenses represent those costs incurred for the operation of our luxury hotel at Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel and our resort hotel at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. The components of these expenses include payroll and payroll related expenses, guest amenity supplies, laundry and other expenses. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, lodging expenses decreased approximately $0.3 2 million, or 86% when compared to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. Lodging expenses as a percentage of of lodging revenues were 6145.83% and 5652.10% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in this percentage is due to athe decrease in ~~average~~expense ~~daily~~coupled ~~room~~with ~~rate.~~ the increase in lodging revenues, discussed above. While we continue to monitor efficiencies in the lodging segment, we we seek to maintain the quality of our product and services for the benefit of ~~our~~ our patrons.

~~Retail, Entertainment and Other Expenses~~30

Retail, entertainment and other expenses primarily represent those costs incurred for the operation of our retail shops and spas and our entertainment offerings. The components of these expenses include payroll and payroll related costs, the purchase of products offered for sale in our retail outlets and spas and contract costs for entertainers. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, these costs decreased approximately $0.3 million, or 7%, over the comparable 2009 period, primarily due to a $0.2 million decrease in headline entertainment costs. Retail, entertainment and other expenses as a percentage of retail, entertainment and other revenues were 63.5% and 59.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The prior year percentage includes the effect of $0.3 million of non-recurring negotiated supplier refunds, which resulted in a lower percentage when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

Retail, Entertainment and Other Expenses

Advertising, General and Administrative Expenses

Advertising, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and payroll ~~related~~ related expenses, regulatory fees, advertising and marketing costs, Head Lease expense, insurance, legal and utility costs. For the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010, such costs ~~decreased~~increased $10.38 million, or 32%, from the same period in 2009. The ~~decrease~~ increase was ~~primarily~~ due to aincreases ~~decrease of $2.5 million~~ in ~~payroll and related~~professional ~~expenses~~services ~~due~~expense, topromotional ~~ongoing~~expense ~~efficiency~~and ~~measures~~utilities ~~employed~~expense byof ~~the~~$0.7 ~~Company~~million, ~~and a~~ ~~decrease of~~ $10.24 million inand ~~regulatory~~$0.3 ~~expenses~~million, ~~partially~~respectively, offset by ~~an increase~~a decrease of $10.3 6 million in ~~Head~~payroll ~~Lease~~and ~~expense~~related ~~and~~expenses andue ~~increase~~to ofongoing ~~$1.1~~efficiency ~~million~~measures inemployed ~~all~~by ~~other~~the ~~expenses~~Company. Advertising, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of gross revenues were 2927.65% and 3027.16%, for the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Pre-opening Expenses

Pre-opening expenses are non-recurring costs incurred to support the expected opening of ~~new~~ new facilities. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, pre-opening expenses incurred of $~~20,000~~ 0.3 million and $~~78,000,~~0.1 million, respectively, were primarily related to the preparation of the Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, ~~to be~~ operated by the Lewiston Golf Course Corporation.

Depreciation Expense

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, depreciation expense was $11.01 million and $1211.67 million, respectively, a decrease of $10.6 million, or 12 5%.

Impairment of Property and Equipment

On August 27, 2008, the construction activities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino, as previously described, were suspended for reasons including: prevailing economic conditions; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable interest rates; and operating and other demands on our available cash, such as our payments and distributions to the Nation. Furthermore, certain master planning efforts related to the ~~future~~ future expansion of the Seneca Niagara Falls property were suspended for the ~~same~~ same reasons. As a result of ~~the~~these ~~ongoing suspension~~circumstances, an impairment charge of approximately $~~166,000~~109.0 million was recorded during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010, in addition to the impairment~~ ~~charge of $107.6 million recognized during the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal~~ 2009.

Other Non-Operating Expenses

The following table summarizes information related to other non-operating expenses:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Non-operating expenses	$	¾	$	50

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded an other-than-temporary loss on one specific investment of $0.1 million as other non-operating expense. The cost basis of this investment was reduced by the amount of the other-than-temporary loss recorded.

Interest Income

Interest income was approximately $1429,000 and $23118,000, respectively, for the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 and 2009. The decrease in interest income is due primarily to a $100,000 non-recurring adjustment during the three months ended June 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

The following table summarizes information related to interest on our long-term debt and Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Interest expense	$	9,628	$	9,500

~~Table~~During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, interest expense consisted primarily of ~~Contents~~interest on our $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 7¼% Senior Notes, including $0.8 million of amortization related to financing costs and discount, which was partially offset for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 by $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of capitalized interest primarily related to construction activities for our Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club.

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest expense	$	9,530	$	9,674

During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, interest expense consisted of interest on our $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7¼% senior notes, including $0.8 million of amortization related to financing costs and discount, which was partially offset by $0.4 million of capitalized interest primarily related to construction activities for our Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club.

Net Income

Net income for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 was $1424.31 million, ~~compared~~ compared to a net ~~income~~loss of $1782.67 million for the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2009, aan ~~decrease~~increase of $3106.38 million, for the reasons stated above.

Operating Results - ~~Six Months~~Nine Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 Compared to the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009

Summary of Operating Results

The following table summarizes our results from operations by corporation and/or facility:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Net revenues:
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	~~182~~280,~~561~~460		$	~~188~~286,~~260~~851
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	68107,~~243~~199			71110,~~272~~610
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	2338,~~579~~569			1930,~~225~~328
Total	$	~~274~~426,~~383~~228		$	~~278~~427,~~757~~789
Operating expenses:
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	~~140~~211,~~463~~821		$	~~141~~213,~~437~~379
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	68104,~~203~~003			72126,~~381~~485
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	1726,~~104~~770			15110,~~323~~713
Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club	81364			~~102~~198
Seneca Gaming Corporation	~~967~~2,001			1,~~086~~853
Total	$	~~226~~344,~~818~~959		$	~~230~~452,~~329~~628
Operating income (loss):
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	4268,~~098~~639		$	4673,~~823~~472
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	403,196			(115,~~109~~875		)
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	611,~~475~~799			3(80,~~902~~385		)
Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club	(81364		)	(~~102~~198		)
Seneca Gaming Corporation	(~~967~~2,001		)	(1,~~086~~853		)
Total	$	4781,~~565~~269		$	48(24,~~428~~839	)

~~The most important factors or trends contributing to our operating performance during the six months ended March 31, 2010 were:~~32

· A 3% increase in the exclusivity fee payable to New York State, beginning January 1, 2010, from 22% to 25% which resulted in a $3.5 million increase to our operating expenses during the first six months of Fiscal 2010 ($2.3 million of the increase is attributable to Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel, $0.8 million is attributable to Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, and $0.4 million is attributable to Seneca Buffalo Creek);

Table of Contents

· The most ~~national~~important ~~recession~~factors ~~and~~or ~~resulting~~trends contributing to our operating performance ~~impact~~during onthe ~~discretionary~~nine ~~consumer~~months ~~spending;~~ended June 30, 2010 were:

· Extension of hours of operation of the Seneca Buffalo Creek facility, effective February 2009, and subsequent expansion of the Buffalo Creek facility, which opened in March 2010, to approximately 10,600 square feet of gaming space and a total of 457 slot machines;

· ~~Relatively~~ Capital ~~temperate~~investment ~~weather~~in ~~during~~approximately ~~the~~685 ~~six~~slot machines, ~~months~~421 ~~ended~~at ~~March 31, 2010~~Seneca ~~compared~~Niagara toFalls ~~the~~Casino ~~same~~and ~~period~~Hotel inand ~~2009;~~264 at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, introducing new gaming content to our gaming floors;

· ~~Capital~~ Relatively ~~investment~~temperate inweather ~~approximately~~during ~~577 slot~~the ~~machines, 401 at Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel and 176 at Seneca~~nine ~~Allegany~~months ~~Casino~~ended ~~and Hotel~~June 30, ~~introducing~~2010 ~~new~~compared ~~gaming~~to ~~content~~the tosame ~~our~~period ~~gaming~~in ~~floors.~~2009;

· A 3% increase in the exclusivity fee payable to New York State, beginning January 1, 2010, from 22% to 25% which resulted in a $7.4 million increase to our operating expenses during the first nine months of Fiscal 2010 ($4.7 million of the increase is attributable to Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel, $1.9 million is attributable to Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, and $0.8 million is attributable to Seneca Buffalo Creek);

· The ongoing economic recession and resulting impact on discretionary consumer spending;

Gross Revenues

Gross revenues consisted of the following:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Gaming	$	~~253~~392,~~017~~949	$	~~255~~392,~~439~~615
Food and beverage	2641,~~829~~337		2843,~~435~~174
Lodging	917,~~844~~885		1117,~~872~~800
Retail, entertainment and other	1016,~~958~~800		1217,~~266~~619
Total	$	~~300~~468,~~648~~971	$	~~308~~471,~~012~~208

The table below summarizes the percentage of gross revenues from each revenue source:

	Six Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010		2009
Gaming	84.2	%	82.9	%
Food and beverage	8.9	%	9.2	%
Lodging	3.3	%	3.9	%
Retail, entertainment and other	3.6	%	4.0	%
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%

Table of Contents

	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010		2009
Gaming	83.8	%	83.3	%
Food and beverage	8.8	%	9.2	%
Lodging	3.8	%	3.8	%
Retail, entertainment and other	3.6	%	3.7	%
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%

Gaming Revenue

Our gaming revenue for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 ~~decreased~~increased from $~~255~~392.46 million to $~~253~~392.09 million when compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the expansion of the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino, which has offset the ongoing impact of adverse economic conditions on consumer demand ~~for~~ for gaming and entertainment offerings.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel’s net gaming revenue decreased $4.28 million, or 32%; Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel’s net gaming revenue decreased $2.49 million, or 43%; and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino’s net gaming revenue increased $48.20 million, or 2227%, when comparing these same periods.

Revenues from slot machines are the largest component of our gaming revenues. The following table presents data related to slot revenues (in thousands, except where noted):

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Slot handle	$	24,~~960~~597,~~451~~842		$	24,~~992~~609,~~796~~068
Gross slot revenue	$	~~230~~359,~~985~~611		$	~~231~~357,~~541~~560
Net slot revenue	$	~~226~~352,~~315~~913		$	~~225~~348,~~461~~173
Free promotional slot plays (1)	$	2133,~~136~~492		$	2238,~~904~~890
Weighted average number of slot machines (in units)	6,~~516~~552			6,~~672~~666
Gross slot hold percentage	7.8		%	7.78		%
Gross slot win per unit per day (in dollars)	$	~~195~~201		$	~~191~~196

Table of Contents

(1) Free promotional slot plays are included in slot handle, but not reflected in slot revenues.

Net slot revenue increased $04.97 million, or ~~0.4~~1%, when comparing the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, due primarily to anthe ~~increase in~~expansion ~~slot~~of ~~hold~~the ~~percentage~~Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino.

The following table presents data related to table game revenues (in thousands, except where noted):

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Table games drop	$	~~166~~257,~~879~~678		$	~~183~~274,~~004~~848
Net table games revenue	$	2639,~~523~~787		$	2944,~~753~~098
Weighted average number of table games (in units)	~~138~~136			143
Table games hold percentage	15.95		%	1615.39		%
Gross table games revenue per unit per day (in dollars)	$	1,~~060~~071		$	1,~~152~~119

Net table games revenue decreased $3.2 million, or 11%, when comparing the six months ended March 31, 2010 to the six months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was principally due to the economic and related factors previously noted, coupled with a slight decrease in the average number of table games and the table games hold percentage when comparing these same periods.34

Table of Contents

Net table games revenue decreased $4.3 million, or 10%, when comparing the nine months ended June 30, 2010 to the nine months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was principally due to a decrease in the average number of table games and the table games hold percentage, coupled with the economic and related factors previously noted, when comparing these same periods.

Food and Beverage Revenue

The following table presents data related to food and beverage revenue (in thousands, except where noted):

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
Covers	12,~~835~~812		12,~~891~~904
Average check (in dollars)	$	14.6270	$	1514.0487

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our consolidated food and beverage revenue decreased $1.68 million, or 64% when compared to the same period in 2009, due primarily to the ongoing economic conditions causing a decrease in overall consumer spending for leisure and entertainment purposes. Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel’s food and beverage revenue accounted for $0.9 million of the decrease; Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel’s and food and beverage revenue accounted for $01.70 million of the decrease; and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino’s food and beverage revenue ~~approximated~~increased ~~the~~$0.1 ~~revenue~~million ~~for~~ when compared with the same period ~~quarter~~ in the prior year. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, ~~53% and~~ 52%~~, respectively,~~ of our food and beverage revenue were the result of Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

Lodging Revenue

The following table presents data related to lodging revenue:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Occupied rooms	~~125~~197,~~758~~447			~~137~~208,~~041~~644
Average daily room rate (ADR)	$	7890.2858		$	8685.6331
Occupancy rate	8992.52		%	9394.67		%
Revenue per available room (REVPAR)	$	7083.0948		$	8180.1176

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our lodging revenue ~~decreased~~increased by $2.0 .1 million, or 17 1%, when compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, due primarily to ~~a decrease~~an increase in the ~~number~~average ofrate per occupied ~~rooms~~room, ~~and~~which ~~average~~more ~~rate~~than offset ~~per~~a decrease in the number of occupied ~~room~~ rooms resulting from ongoing economic conditions. Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel’s lodging revenue increased ~~accounted for~~ $10.82 million ofwhile ~~the decrease and~~ Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel’s lodging revenue decreased ~~accounted~~by ~~for~~ $0.21 million ~~of the decrease~~. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, 80% and 76% of our lodging revenue, respectively, was the result of Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

2835

Table of Contents

Retail, Entertainment and Other Revenue

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our retail revenue ~~decreased~~approximated ~~$0.2 million, or~~that ~~11%,~~of ~~when compared to~~ the same period in 2009. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, 7573% and 8077%, respectively, of our retail revenue was attributable to Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our entertainment revenue decreased $0.32 million, or 318%, when compared to the same period in 2009, ~~primarily~~ primarily due to the impact of the entertainment product mix at Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel including more shows in the Bear’s Den (a smaller venue compared to the Seneca Niagara Events Center) during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, coupled with lower average ticket prices, compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, 5355% and 50% of ~~our~~ our entertainment revenue, respectively, was attributable to Seneca Link Player’s Card point redemptions.

~~During the six months~~The ~~ended~~following ~~March 31,~~table ~~2010,~~presents ~~other~~data ~~revenue~~related ~~decreased $0.8 million, or 13%, when compared~~ to ~~the~~entertainment ~~same period in 2009, primarily due to the impact of non-recurring negotiated supplier refunds received during the six months ended March 31, 2009.~~revenue:

	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010						2009
	SNFGC			STGC			SNFGC			STGC
Number of shows	63			14			37			6
Number of tickets sold	35,433			21,784			40,836			12,084
Occupancy percentage	70		%	67		%	84		%	83		%
Average ticket price	$	44.58		$	41.94		$	52.86		$	44.63

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, other revenue decreased $0.6 million, or 8%, when compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to the impact of non-recurring negotiated supplier refunds received during the nine months ended June 30, 2009.

Promotional Allowances

The retail value of providing such promotional allowances was included in revenues as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Food and beverage	1421,~~095~~307		1422,~~889~~529
Lodging	714,~~418~~317		913,~~068~~500
Retail, entertainment and other	47,~~752~~119		57,~~298~~390
Total	$	2642,~~265~~743	$	2943,~~255~~419

The estimated cost of providing such promotional allowances was as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Food and beverage	$	10,760	$	11,198
Lodging	4,392		4,513
Retail, entertainment and other	3,816		4,375
Total	$	18,968	$	20,086

Promotional allowances as a percentage of gaming revenue were 10.4% and 11.5% during the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Promotional allowances decreased $3.0 million, or 10%, when comparing the six months ended March 31, 2010 to the same period in 2009. As shown in the table above, food and beverage, lodging, retail, entertainment and other promotional allowances decreased $0.8 million, $1.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Food and beverage	$	15,949	$	16,782
Lodging	6,856		6,777
Retail, entertainment and other	5,607		6,229
Total	$	28,412	$	29,788

Promotional allowances as a percentage of gaming revenue were 10.9% and 11.1% during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Promotional allowances decreased $0.7 million, or 2%, when comparing the nine months ended June 30, 2010 to the same period in 2009. As shown in the table above, food and beverage and retail, entertainment and other promotional allowances decreased $1.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, while lodging promotional allowances increased $0.8 million.

Detailed Operating Expense Information

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Operating expenses:
Gaming	$	78122,~~209~~122	$	73112,~~650~~534
Food and beverage	2131,~~088~~824		2133,~~904~~030
Lodging	58,~~851~~747		69,~~159~~243
Retail, entertainment and other	710,~~387~~711		710,~~445~~752
Advertising, general and administrative	92138,~~195~~071		95140,~~865~~949
Pre-opening costs	92378		~~136~~246
Depreciation	2132,~~775~~885		2536,~~170~~838
Impairment of property and equipment	221		¾109,036
Total operating expenses	$	~~226~~344,~~818~~959	$	~~230~~452,~~329~~628

Gaming Expenses

The following table summarizes the exclusivity fees expense by property:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel	$	3555,~~091~~266	$	3350,~~197~~815
Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel	1321,~~598~~774		1320,~~192~~707
Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino	59,~~449~~119		46,~~153~~549
Total	$	5486,~~138~~159	$	5078,~~542~~071

The slot exclusivity fee increased $38.61 million, from $5078.51 million for the nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 to $5486.12 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010, due to a 3% increase in the exclusivity fee percentage which became effective January 1, 2010, and resulted in a $3.5 million increase to expense during the six months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2009. Gaming expenses as a percentage of gross gaming revenues were 28.5% and 26.5% for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gaming expenses, prior to exclusivity fees expense, as a percentage of gross gaming revenues were 9.5% and 9.0% for those same periods.

Table of Contents

percentage which became effective January 1, 2010, and resulted in a $7.4 million increase to expense during the nine months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2009. Gaming expenses as a percentage of gross gaming revenues were 31.1% and 28.7% for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gaming expenses, prior to exclusivity fees expense, as a percentage of gross gaming revenues were 9.2% and 8.8% for those same periods.

Food and Beverage Expenses

Food and beverage expenses represent those costs incurred for the operation of our restaurants, snack bars and beverage outlets. The primary components of these expenses are the cost of food and beverage products and payroll and payroll related expenses for team members providing the service. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, food and beverage costs decreased $01.82 million, or 4%, when compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to lower volumes, reflected as a decrease in covers (as ~~discussed~~indicated above under “Food and Beverage Revenue”). Food and beverage expenses as a percentage of food and beverage revenues were 7877.60% and 7776.05% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Lodging Expenses

Lodging ~~expenses~~ expenses represent those costs incurred for the operation of our luxury hotel at Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel and our resort hotel at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. The components of these expenses include payroll and payroll related expenses, guest amenity supplies, laundry and other expenses. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, lodging expenses decreased approximately $0.35 million, or 5%, when compared to the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. Lodging expenses as a percentage of ~~lodging~~ lodging revenues were 5948.49% and 51.9% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ~~The increase in this percentage is due to a decrease in average daily room rate.~~ While we continue to monitor efficiencies in the lodging segment, we seek to maintain the quality of our product and services for the benefit of our patrons.

Table of Contents

Retail, Entertainment and Other Expenses

Retail, entertainment and other expenses primarily represent those costs incurred for the operation of our retail shops and spas and our entertainment offerings. The components of these expenses include payroll and payroll related costs, the purchase of products offered for sale in our retail outlets and spas and contract costs for entertainers. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, these costs approximated those of the comparable 2009 period. Retail, entertainment and other expenses as a percentage of retail, entertainment and other revenues were 6763.48% and 6061.70%, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase over the prior year percentage is in part due to the effect of $0.6 million of non-recurring negotiated supplier refunds.

Advertising, General and Administrative Expenses

Advertising, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and payroll related expenses, regulatory fees, advertising and marketing costs, Head Lease expense, insurance, legal and utility costs. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, such costs decreased $32.79 million, or 4 2%, from the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $45.95 million in payroll and related expenses, due to ongoing efficiency measures employed by the Company and a decrease of $0.4 million in regulatory expense, offset by an ~~increase~~ increases of $1.07 million in professional services expenses; ~~and~~$0.5 amillion ~~net~~in special ~~increase~~events ofexpense; $0.25 million in ~~all~~advertising ~~other~~expense; ~~expenses~~and $0.3 million in promotional expense. Advertising, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of gross revenues were 3029.74% and 3129.19%, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Pre-opening Expenses

Pre-opening expenses are non-recurring costs incurred to support the expected opening of ~~new~~ new facilities. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, $0.14 million ofand ~~pre-opening~~$0.2 ~~expenses~~million, ~~were incurred~~respectively, ~~primarily related to the preparation~~ of ~~the Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, to be operated by the Lewiston Golf Course Corporation.~~pre-

Table of Contents

opening expenses were incurred, primarily related to the preparation of the Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, operated by the Lewiston Golf Course Corporation.

Depreciation Expense

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, depreciation expense was $2132.89 million and $2536.28 million, respectively, a decrease of $3.49 million, or 14 11%.

Impairment of Property and Equipment

On August 27, 2008, the construction activities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino, as previously described, were suspended for reasons described above in the Executive Summary. As a result of the ongoing suspension and reassessment of estimated impairment charges, approximately $221,000 was recorded during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, in addition to the impairment charge of $107.6 million recognized during the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009.

Other Non-Operating ~~Expenses~~Expense

The following table summarizes information related to other non-operating ~~expenses~~expense:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Non-operating expenses	$	113	$	163
Other non-operating expense	$	113	$	188

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 and 2009, we recorded an other-than-temporary loss on ~~one~~ one specific investment of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, as ~~other~~ other non-operating expense. The cost basis of this investment has been reduced by by the amount of the other-than-temporary loss recorded.

Interest Income

Interest income was approximately $~~25,000~~0.1 million and $810.2 million,~~000,~~ respectively, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009. The decrease in interest income ~~can~~is bedue primarily ~~attributed~~ to ~~the decrease~~a in$0.1 ~~the~~million ~~average~~non-recurring ~~cash~~adjustment ~~balance~~during onthe ~~deposit~~three ~~with financial institutions in~~months ~~interest~~ended ~~bearing~~June 30, ~~accounts when comparing these periods~~2009.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

The following table summarizes information related to interest on our long-term debt and Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest expense	$	1928,~~071~~699	$	1928,~~277~~777

During the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, interest expense consisted of interest on our $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7¼% senior notes, including $1.6 million of amortization related to financing costs and discount, which was partially offset by $0.7 million of capitalized interest primarily related to construction activities for our Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club.39

Table of Contents

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, interest expense consisted of interest on our Senior Notes, including $2.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of amortization related to financing costs and discount, which was partially offset by $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of capitalized interest primarily related to construction activities for our Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club.

Net Income

Net income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 was $2852.4 5 million, compared to a net ~~income~~loss of $2953.16 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, aan increase ~~decrease~~ of $0106.71 million, for the reasons stated above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In addition, we intend to continue to work closely with the Nation to help ensure cash generated from our operations, available cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments and cash available under our Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement are sufficient to service our debt, satisfy our other financial obligations and commitments and to meet our working capital requirements for the remainder of the current fiscal year. In October 2009, the Nation reduced anticipated Fiscal 2010 monthly distributions, exclusive of amounts required under the Distribution Agreement to $30.0 million, compared to $42.0 million for Fiscal 2009. As a result of these efforts, in conjunction with our efforts to create additional ~~operating~~ operating efficiencies, SGC’s depository cash balances increased to approximately $8291.7 8 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 (including $3347.09 million of restricted cash) from $1861.87 million, ~~net of the $20.0 million proceeds drawn under the Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement,~~ as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2009.

Our ability to fund our operations, make planned capital expenditures, service our debt and satisfy our other financial obligations and commitments depends on our future operating performance and cash flow, which are in turn subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. Additionally, unlike traditional corporations, we are prohibited by law from obtaining capital through an offering of equity securities and our ability to incur additional indebtedness is limited under the terms of the Indenture governing the ~~senior~~Senior ~~notes~~Notes, the Distribution Agreement and the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.

We ~~are~~ are leveraged, have significant interest payment requirements under the ~~Indenture~~ Indenture governing the Senior Notes, distribution obligations under the ~~Distribution~~ Distribution Agreement and other commitments from time to time to the Nation. We make distributions to the Nation pursuant to declarations by our Board of Directors. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, we distributed $1522.05 million and $2633.2 million, respectively, to the Nation pursuant to such declarations. We distributed an additional $711.52 million and $710.07 million to the Nation during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, respectively, pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. As such, limitations on our capital resources could force us to further delay or abandon capital projects including the construction and development of ~~expansion~~ expansion projects currently suspended.

3240

Table of Contents

Cash Flows

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Net cash provided by operations	$	5985,~~545~~407		$	5984,~~764~~791
Cash flows relating to investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(1322,~~936~~532		)	(3340,~~786~~137		)
Deposits to restricted cash	(3347,~~013~~910		)	¾—
Change in long-term deposits	108			5082
Land acquisition costs	(~~115~~612		)	(~~482~~1,022		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(4771,~~054~~046		)	(3441,~~218~~077		)
Cash flows relating to financing activities
Contribution received from the Nation	5,101			¾—
Cash paid for deferred financing fees	(79		)	¾—
Proceeds from senior secured revolving loan agreement	¾—			20,000
Distributions paid to the Nation	(22,452		)	(33,239		)
Payments on senior secured revolving loan agreement	—			(20,000		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(17,430		)	(13,239		)
Distributions paid to the Nation	(33,650		)	(43,937		)
Net increase(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(4,939	)	$	12,307
Net cash used in financing activities	(28,628		)	(43,937		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(14,267	)	$	(223	)

Cash Flows—Operating Activities

The $0.26 million ~~decrease~~increase in cash flows from operations during the ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ ~~March~~ended June 3130, 2010 as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 was due to ~~lower~~higher ~~depreciation~~net ~~expense~~income of $3106.1 million; a decrease in cash payments of current liabilities of $4.6 million and ~~lower~~a ~~net~~decrease ~~income~~in cash paid for current assets of $03.7 0 million, offset by ana ~~increase~~decrease in ~~cash~~impairment ~~inflows~~of ~~from~~property and ~~the~~equipment ~~change~~of $108.8 million; a decrease in ~~current liabilities~~depreciation expense of $14.6 0 million and a decrease in ~~cash~~bad ~~outflows~~debt ~~for~~expense ~~current assets~~ of $20.3 million.

Cash Flows—Investing Activities

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, cash flows used in investing activities were approximately $4771.10 million, compared to $3441.21 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. The increase of $1229.89 million was due primarily to an increase in restricted cash of $3347.09 million, partly offset by a decrease in cash paid for property and equipment and land acquisition costs of $1917.96 million and 0.4 million, respectively.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~capital~~purchases ~~expenditures~~of property and equipment were $1322.9 5 million and consisted of: $23.47 million related to construction of the Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club; ~~and~~ $5.6.9 million for the expansion of the ~~existing~~ existing gaming facility at the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino~~. The~~; ~~remaining~~and $511.9 million ~~in capital expenditures were principally~~ for the acquisition of equipment for existing casino operations, principally, the purchase of slot machines. ~~Our~~Land ~~land~~ acquisitions of $0.16 million include legal expenses and other acquisition costs related to certain parcels within the 50 acre “footprint” described in the Compact with New York State and designated for ownership by the Nation.

Cash Flows—Financing Activities

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, net cash used in financing activities was $1728.46 million, compared to $1343.29 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009, ana ~~increase~~decrease of $415.2 3 million. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 these activities included cash distributions paid to the Nation of $2233.57 million, partially offset by a cash contribution received from the Nation of $5.1 million. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 these activities consisted of cash distributions to the Nation of $3343.29 million ~~offset by proceeds from borrowings under the senior secured revolving loan agreement of $20~~.~~0 million.~~

Table of Contents

Principal Debt Arrangements

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our debt instruments and facilities consisted of the ~~2004 and 2005 senior~~ ~~notes~~Senior Notes on which we pay a fixed interest rate of 7¼%, and the ~~$50.0 million~~ Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement, which matures on December 31, 2011. Following is a summary of certain material terms of the ~~senior~~Senior Notes ~~notes~~ and the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.

The Senior Notes. On May 5, 2004 and May 23, 2005, SGC issued $300.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively, in senior ~~notes~~ notes with fixed interest payable at a rate of 7¼% per annum due 2012, which we ~~refer~~ refer to collectively as the Senior Notes, under the Indenture. The Senior Notes are currently guaranteed by SNFGC, STGC, SEGC, and LGCC. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1. The Senior Notes mature on May 1, 2012. The Senior Notes are unsecured general obligations. As of June 30, 2010, accrued interest on the Senior Notes was $6.0 million. The Indenture contains certain covenants, including limitations on restricted payments and the incurrence of indebtedness, and reporting obligations. As of June 30, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Indenture.

33Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement. On December 18, 2009, SGC amended its $50.0 million Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date from December 19, 2009 to December 31, 2011. Amounts borrowed under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to bear interest at either one, three or six-month LIBOR plus one and one quarter percent (1.25%), or the prime rate (as reported in The Wall Street Journal) plus one quarter percent (0.25%), with any outstanding principal balance to be paid by, or on, the new maturity date. The $50.0 million commitment under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement reduces in tandem with any reduction in the letter of credit requirement imposed by the ESDC (relating to the ESDC’s efforts on behalf of SGC in connection with ongoing condemnation proceedings in Niagara Falls, New York) up to an aggregate reduction of $10.0 million. As of June 30, 2010, the commitment was reduced to $49.2 million in accordance with this provision. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement requires that SGC maintain all of its deposit and investment accounts with the lender, subject to limited exceptions for certain existing accounts. In addition, beginning June 18, 2010 the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement provides for the lender’s restriction of certain SGC deposits maintained with the lender, for commitments in excess of $40 million. As of June 30, 2010, the amount restricted under this provision amounts to $9.2 million, and is reported as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.

SGC’s obligations under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to be secured by substantially all gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. SGC’s obligations are guaranteed by SNFGC, STGC, SEGC and LGCC, and the guarantors’ obligations continue to be secured by substantially all of each guarantor’s gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement modifies certain of the financial covenants contained in the Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement, including reducing the minimum consolidated EBITDA covenant from $160 million to $145 million (on a rolling 12-month basis) as well as modifying the total leverage ratio (of total funded debt to EBITDA) to a limit of 3.5 to 1.0. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement also continues to contain additional customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the creation of additional liens and the disposition of assets. As of June 30, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.

As of June 30, 2010, at SGC’s request, the lender under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement had issued letters of credit totaling $17.4 million, $12.3 million (as required by the ESDC) of which may be drawn upon to fund the purchase of certain parcels within the 50 acre “footprint” described in the Compact with New York State and designated for ownership by the Nation, with the remaining $5.1 million issued in connection with worker’s compensation policies and certain other contracts, as required.

Table of Contents

SEGC, and LGCC. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1. The Senior Notes mature on May 1, 2012. The Senior Notes are unsecured general obligations. As of March 31, 2010, accrued interest on the Senior Notes was $15.1 million. The indenture contains certain covenants, including limitations on restricted payments and the incurrence of indebtedness, and reporting obligations. As of March 31, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Indenture.

Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement. On December 18, 2009, SGC amended its $50.0 million Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date from December 19, 2009 to December 31, 2011. Amounts borrowed under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to bear interest at either one, three or six-month LIBOR plus one and one quarter percent (1.25%), or the prime rate (as reported in The Wall Street Journal) plus one quarter percent (0.25%), with any outstanding principal balance to be paid by, or on, the new maturity date. The $50.0 million commitment under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement reduces in tandem with any reduction in the letter of credit requirement imposed by the ESDC (relating to the ESDC’s efforts on behalf of SGC in connection with ongoing condemnation proceedings in Niagara Falls, New York) up to an aggregate reduction of $10.0 million. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement requires that SGC maintain all of its deposit and investment accounts with the lender, subject to limited exceptions for certain existing accounts.

SGC’s obligations under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement continue to be secured by substantially all gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. SGC’s obligations are guaranteed by SNFGC, STGC, SEGC and LGCC, and the guarantors’ obligations continue to be secured by substantially all of each guarantor’s gaming and related assets (including substantially all gaming revenues) not constituting real property or improvements. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement modifies certain of the financial covenants contained in the Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement, including reducing the minimum consolidated EBITDA covenant from $160 million to $145 million (on a rolling 12-month basis) as well as modifying the total leverage ratio (of total funded debt to EBITDA) to a limit of 3.5 to 1.0. The Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement also continues to contain additional customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the creation of additional liens and the disposition of assets. As of March 31, 2010, SGC was in compliance with all covenants in the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement.

As of March 31, 2010, at SGC’s request, the lender under the Amended Senior Secured Revolving Loan Agreement had issued letters of credit totaling $18.3 million, $13.2 million (as required by the ESDC) of which may be drawn upon to fund the purchase of certain parcels within the 50 acre “footprint” described in the Compact with New York State and designated for ownership by the Nation, with the remaining $5.1 million issued in connection with worker’s compensation policies and certain other contracts, as required.

Distribution Agreement Obligations

On April 27, 2007, SGC entered into a Distribution Agreement among the Nation, the Seneca Nation of Indians Capital Improvements Authority, or the Authority, SGC and Wells Fargo Bank, as Trustee, in connection with the Authority’s issuance in two series (one tax exempt and the other taxable) of an aggregate ~~principal~~ principal amount of $159,495,000 special obligation bonds, or the 2007 Nation Bonds. The Distribution Agreement obligates SGC, subject to any contractual restrictions applicable to SGC (including, but not limited to, those contained in the Senior Notes Indenture) to make monthly distributions to the Nation at the times and in the amounts necessary to enable the Authority to pay the debt service on the 2007 Nation Bonds as required under the Authority’s indenture. At the direction of the Nation and the Authority, SGC pays such distributions directly to the Trustee. The Authority’s debt ~~service~~ service commenced on June 1, 2007. For the period from June 1, 2007 through November 1, 2007, the Authority’s debt service averaged approximately $0.9 million per month. For the period December 1, 2007 through June 1, 2008, the Authority’s debt service ~~averaged~~ averaged approximately $1.7 million per month. In June 2008, it was determined that the amortization (debt service) schedule provided, upon which the foregoing $1.7 million monthly payments was made, was incorrect. A corrected amortization schedule was provided and, after giving effect to a resulting credit for amounts overpaid, for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 1, 2023, the Authority’s debt service averages approximately $1.2 million per month. The foregoing debt service averages are based on scheduled payments of interest and principal under the Authority’s indenture and bonds and do not address the effects of any earlier call for redemption, by acceleration or otherwise. The Distribution Agreement provides that neither the Trustee nor the Authority’s bondholders will have any recourse under the Distribution Agreement to any revenues, assets or property of SGC or its subsidiaries should SGC fail to comply with our ~~distribution~~ distribution obligations. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010 and 2009, SGC distributed to the Nation $711.52 million and $710.07 million, respectively, for the Authority’s debt service on the special obligation bonds.

Table of Contents

respectively, for the Authority’s debt service on the special obligation bonds.

Other Commitments

In 2002 and pursuant to the Compact, the Nation acquired from the State of New York approximately 24 acres of land and related improvements in the City of Niagara Falls, New York, including the then-Niagara Falls Convention Center. The State of New York further agreed in the Compact to assist the Nation in whatever manner appropriate, including through the exercise of its power of eminent domain, to acquire the remaining acreage within the approximate 50-acre footprint in the City of Niagara Falls, New York, designated by New York State under the Compact for ownership by the Nation. The Compact specifically excluded approximately 1.5 acres of land within the footprint owned by a Roman Catholic Church. Additionally, in July 2006, the Nation agreed to waive its right to acquire approximately one half acre of additional land within the footprint owned by End Time Handmaidens, Inc., a religious organization. In return for the waiver, the Nation obtained a right of first negotiation and refusal with respect to the future sale of the parcels. As a result of the carve-out relating to the parcels owned by the Roman Catholic Church, and the Nation’s agreement with End Time Handmaidens, the total acreage of the Niagara Territory upon completion of the condemnation process is anticipated to be approximately 48 acres.

We have obtained possession of, either through eminent domain proceedings or private purchase, substantially all of the remaining acreage within the footprint, other than certain streets and alleys owned by the City of Niagara Falls providing access to the above church parcels, and a bicycle path owned by the New York State Department of Transportation, or NYSDOT. We expect to acquire the above Niagara Falls city street and alley parcels during the ~~third~~fourth quarter of Fiscal 2010, with acquisition of the NYSDOT bike path requiring further dialogue with New York State.

Substantially all of the post-2002 real property acquisitions in Niagara Falls, New York have been pursuant to New York State Eminent Domain Procedure Law, or EDPL, using the State’s power of eminent domain (through the ESDC). The amounts paid to condemnees from whom the ESDC has acquired property are deemed to be advance payments, in that property owners are entitled to reserve their rights to challenge the land and improvement values determined by the condemnor’s appraisers. The ESDC has made advanced payments under the EDPL of approximately $31.5 million for the condemned parcels within the ~~footprint~~ footprint including, in particular, approximately 18 acres of land and related ~~fixtures~~ fixtures (a former water park) for an ~~aggregate advanced payment of $18.0 million, and another hotel property for an aggregate advanced payment of $8.2 million (excluding fixtures).~~

Pursuant to the EDPL, New York state courts will determine the final purchase price to be paid to condemnees who elect to challenge the initial appraised value of their property. To date, all record owners from whom property was acquired pursuant to the EDPL have reserved rights to claim additional compensation. Most record owners have filed notices of claim to initiate proceedings challenging the fair market value appraisals utilized by ESDC. The most significant valuation proceedings were those involving Fallsite LLC and Fallsville Splash, LLC, which have filed notices of claim in the amounts of $40.0 million and $35.0 million for land and trade fixtures, respectively, relating to a former water park within the footprint. ESDC’s fair market appraisal value for the foregoing was approximately $17.0 million. On April 5, 2010, the New York State Supreme Court determined that no additional compensation was owed to either Fallsite LLC or Fallsville Splash for the water park real estate and fixtures. SGC anticipates that the former property owners will appeal.43

Intertrust Development had filed a notice of claim for $15.8 million for land and trade fixtures associated with a former Holiday Inn hotel within the footprint. ESDC’s fair market appraisal value for the foregoing was $8.2 million (excluding fixtures). We agreed to a settlement of this matter with Intertrust, whereby Intertrust has received an additional $3.8 million in addition to the appraisal value of $8.2 million, and whereby we have agreed to purchase, for business promotional use, tickets to Fallsview Waterpark, an affiliate of Intertrust, for $2.5 million to be paid in three installments over three years.

Another former landowner, JFD Holdings has filed a notice of claim for $1.1 million for a parcel of land at 621 Niagara Street within the footprint. ESDC’s fair market appraisal for the foregoing is approximately $550,000. No trial date has yet been set. Also, three individuals have filed notices of claim with respect to four parcels within the footprint seeking $955,000, in aggregate, for the four parcels. ESDC’s fair-market appraisal for the four properties, in aggregate, is $185,000. No trial dates have been set.

Table of Contents

~~additional~~aggregate ~~costs~~advanced ~~and~~payment ~~payments to the condemnee, such as attorneys’ fees. As~~ of ~~March 31, 2010,~~ $118.70 million, ~~of the~~and ~~previously~~another ~~recorded~~hotel ~~reserve~~property ~~of $6.4 million remained~~ for ~~such~~an ~~matters and~~aggregate isadvanced ~~included~~payment inof ~~the other current and long-term liabilities sections on SGC’s consolidated balance sheet~~$8. ~~Should~~2 ~~the liability~~million be(excluding ~~greater than our reserve for such matters, it could have a negative impact on income and financial condition~~fixtures).

Another former landowner, JFD Holdings, has filed a notice of claim for $1.1 million for a parcel of land at 621 Niagara Street within the footprint. ESDC’s fair market appraisal for the foregoing is approximately $550,000. No trial date has yet been set. Also, three individuals have filed notices of claim with respect to four parcels within the footprint seeking $955,000, in aggregate, for the four parcels. ESDC’s fair-market appraisal for the four properties, in aggregate, is $185,000. No trial dates have been set.

If a court determines that the value for the land and improvements is higher than the appraised value paid to a condemnee, then SGC may be liable to the condemnee for the difference and potentially also responsible for certain additional costs and payments to the condemnee, such as attorneys’ fees. As of June 30, 2010, $0.8 million of the previously recorded reserve of $6.4 million remained for such matters and is included in the other current liabilities section on SGC’s consolidated balance sheet. Should the liability be greater than our reserve for such matters, it could have a negative impact on income and financial condition.

Expansion and Development Plans

On August 27, 2008, the construction activities at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel and Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino, each described below, were suspended for reasons including: the ~~economic~~ economic recession; inability to obtain construction financing at reasonable ~~interest~~ interest rates; and operating and other demands on available cash, such as payments to the Nation. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, construction remained suspended indefinitely. Furthermore, certain planning efforts related to the future expansion of the Seneca Niagara Falls property were suspended for the same reasons. As a result of these circumstances an impairment charge of $107.6 million was recognized during the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010, an additional $~~166,000~~0 and $221,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment. Nonetheless, SGC will continue to explore alternative future expansion and development options.

Seneca Niagara Falls Casino and Hotel. In 2006, we began master planning activities for the remaining approximately 24 acres of undeveloped land contained in the Niagara Falls footprint. During August 2008, ~~these~~ master planning activities were suspended and an impairment charge was recognized in the third quarter of Fiscal 2009 related to these activities, in the amount of approximately $3.5 million. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an additional $33,000, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel. Construction on the next phase of development at Seneca Allegany Casino and Hotel, which was planned to include an additional 200-room hotel tower, and up to 30,000 square feet of additional gaming space and related amenities, for a total estimated cost of approximately $130 million, was suspended and an impairment charge was recognized in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009 related to these activities, in the amount of approximately $17.1 million. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an adjustment to estimated impairment in the amount of $1,000 and an additional impairment charge of $37,000, respectively, were recognized.44

~~Seneca~~Table ~~Buffalo Creek Casino. Construction on the next phase~~ of ~~development~~ at Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Hotel, which was planned to include approximately 90,000 square feet of gaming space; 2,000 slot machines; 45 table games; a 22-story all-suite hotel; four restaurants; a full-service spa and salon; retail and other amenities; and a 2,200-space parking garage, for a total estimated cost of approximately $333 million, was suspended and an impairment charge was recognized in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009 related to these activities, in the amount of approximately $87.0 million. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, an additional $134,000 and $151,000, respectively, were recorded as impairments of property and equipment.Contents

these master planning activities were suspended and an impairment charge was recognized in the third quarter of Fiscal 2009 related to these activities, in the amount of approximately $3.5 million. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $0 and $33,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino. Construction on the next phase of development at Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino and Hotel, which was planned to include approximately 90,000 square feet of gaming space; 2,000 slot machines; 45 table games; a 22-story all-suite hotel; four restaurants; a full-service spa and salon; retail and other amenities; and a 2,200-space parking garage, for a total estimated cost of approximately $333 million, was suspended and an impairment charge was recognized in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2009 related to these activities, in the amount of approximately $87.0 million. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $0 and $151,000, respectively, was recorded as an impairment of property and equipment.

On March 5, 2010 SEGC completed an expansion of the existing facility, increasing the number of slot machines to 457 and the total square feet of gaming space to approximately 10,600.

Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club. In July 2007, the Company commenced construction of the Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club, ~~an 18-hole~~SNFGC’s ~~Robert~~championship ~~Trent~~level ~~Jones II designed~~ golf course., ~~The golf course is located~~ in Lewiston, New York. ~~and~~It is located approximately ~~ten~~10 miles from the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel. The golf course will serve as an amenity for our patrons intended to enable SGC to increase its demographic and geographic reach. Designed by world-renowned golf architect Robert Trent Jones II, Seneca Hickory Stick Golf Club ~~will~~currently features ~~feature~~ a scenic, ~~Par~~par-72, ~~links~~ PGA-style layout and temporary pro shop. ~~There~~The permanent ~~will~~clubhouse beis acurrently under construction and will feature ~~simple~~approximately 4,300 square ~~foot~~feet ~~clubhouse~~of ~~with~~space, including a pro shop, bar and casual dining for 40 patrons. The area around the clubhouse has been designed to ~~accommodate~~ accommodate tents and support facilities for large tournaments. The golf course opened isfor ~~scheduled~~public ~~to open~~play on July 12, 2010. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company has incurred $2324.02 million for the purchase of land and construction, with a total cost to construct the golf course, clubhouse and related amenities estimated to be approximately $25.5 million.

Table of Contents

Regulation

Our operations are regulated by Nation laws, the Compact and federal statutes, most notably the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or IGRA. Several bills were proposed during past sessions of Congress that would have affected Indian gaming but were not enacted into law. While bills may be introduced that are relevant to Indian gaming in the 111th Congress, leaders from the committees that have jurisdiction over the IGRA have not made any indications that gaming regulation will be an agenda item for the 111th Congress. It remains unclear whether the administration will pursue legislative initiatives related to the topic of Indian gaming.

Table of Contents

The Department of the Interior published final regulations effective August 25, 2008 governing the conduct of gaming on lands taken into trust after October 17, 1988. The regulations on their face do not purport to impair the ability of the Nation and SGC to expand its gaming operations. Future gaming legislation or court decisions construing the new regulations could adversely impact expansion of SGC gaming operations and the future growth of the Nation’s revenue base. In addition, from time to time, various government officials have proposed taxing Indian casino gaming or otherwise limiting or restricting the conduct of gaming operations by Indian tribes. No assurance can be given that such legislation, if and when enacted by Congress, would not have a material adverse effect on the operations of SGC. If Congress were to enact comprehensive amendments to the IGRA, such legislation could have a material adverse effect on the operations of SGC. In addition, under federal law, gaming on the Nation’s lands may be dependent upon the permissibility under New York law of certain forms of gaming or similar activities. If New York State were to make various forms of gaming illegal or against public policy (or the courts were to similarly rule), or otherwise to take a legal position adverse to SGC, such actions could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our gaming operations as currently conducted. Moreover, a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision may permit a state to avoid or refuse to negotiate amendments to existing compacts such as the Compact.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~February~~ April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or ~~the~~ FASB, issued ~~Accounting~~an Accounting Standards Update ~~2010-09~~, “~~Subsequent Events~~Entertainment-Casinos (Topic ~~855~~924), —Accruals ~~Amendments~~for Casino toBase ~~Certain~~Jackpot ~~Recognition~~Liabilities, ~~and~~a ~~Disclosure~~consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task ~~Requirements~~Force,” or ~~Update~~ASU 2010-0916. ~~Update~~ The objective of ASU 2010-0916 ~~removes~~is to address the accounting ~~requirement~~for casino base jackpot liabilities. Specifically, it addresses diversity in practice regarding whether an entity accrues liabilities for ~~companies~~a base ~~filing~~jackpot ~~periodic~~before ~~reports~~it ~~with~~is won if the ~~SEC,~~ orentity ~~SEC~~is ~~filers,~~not required to ~~disclose~~award the ~~date~~base jackpot. ~~through~~Some ~~which~~entities ando ~~entity~~not ~~has~~accrue ~~evaluated~~liabilities for a base jackpot before it ~~subsequent~~is ~~events. However,~~won because they could avoid the payment. Other entities accrue liabilities ~~disclosure~~for ~~exemption~~a ~~does~~base ~~not~~jackpot ~~relieve~~ratably ~~management~~over the period of play expected to precede payout. ASU 2010-16 clarifies that an ~~SEC~~entity ~~filer~~should ~~from~~not ~~its~~accrue jackpot liabilities (or ~~responsibility~~portions tothereof) ~~evaluate~~before ~~subsequent~~a ~~events~~jackpot ~~through~~is won if the ~~date~~entity oncan ~~which~~avoid paying that ~~financial~~jackpot. ~~statements~~Jackpots ~~are~~should ~~issued. Update~~be accrued and charged to revenue when an entity has ~~2010-09~~the ~~became~~obligation ~~effective~~to ~~for~~pay the ~~Company~~jackpot. This guidance applies to both base and progressive jackpots and is effective for ~~the~~fiscal ~~second~~years, ~~quarter~~and ofinterim ~~Fiscal~~periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments ~~adoption~~are ofto be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment reflected in retained earnings. The cumulative-effect adjustment is the difference ~~provisions~~between the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position before initial application of the ~~Update~~amendments ~~did~~and ~~not~~the ~~have~~amounts recognized ain ~~material~~the statement of financial position at initial application of those amendments. The Company is currently evaluating the impact implementation of ASU 2010-16 will have on the ~~Company’s~~ consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update, “Entertainment-Casinos (Topic 924), Accruals for Casino Base Jackpot Liabilities, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force,” or ASU 2010-16. The objective of ASU 2010-16 is to address the accounting for casino base jackpot liabilities. Specifically, it addresses diversity in practice regarding whether an entity accrues liabilities for a base jackpot before it is won if the entity is not required to award the base jackpot. Some entities do not accrue liabilities for a base jackpot before it is won because they could avoid the payment. Other entities accrue liabilities for a base jackpot ratably over the period of play expected to precede payout. ASU 2010-16 clarifies that an entity should not accrue jackpot liabilities (or portions thereof) before a jackpot is won if the entity can avoid paying that jackpot. Jackpots should be accrued and charged to revenue when an entity has the obligation to pay the jackpot. This guidance applies to both base and progressive jackpots and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment reflected in retained earnings. The cumulative-effect adjustment is the difference between the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position before initial application of the amendments and the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position at initial application of those amendments. The Company is currently evaluating the impact implementation of ASU 2010-16 will have on the consolidated financial statements.

Other proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard-setting organizations and certain regulatory agencies. Because of the tentative and preliminary nature of such proposed standards, the Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of such proposed standards would have on the consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes in our market risk exposures since September 30, 2009. For more information, refer to “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included in our 2009 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

refer to “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included in our 2009 Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the financial statements and other disclosures contained in this report. The Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls as of the end of the period covered in this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Table of Contents

reliability of the financial statements and other disclosures contained in this report. The Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls as of the end of the period covered in this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

3847

Table of Contents

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Other than as described below, there have been no material changes in our legal ~~proceedings~~ proceedings since ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010. For more information, refer to “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in our 2009 Form 10-K.

Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Hogen (1:2009-cv-00291 (WDNY)) — CACGEC III

On March 31, 2009, Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County (CACGEC) filed a third action in the United States District Court, Western District of New York against the Chairman of the ~~National~~ ~~Indian Gaming Commission, or~~ NIGC, the United States Department of the Interior, the NIGC, the Secretary of the Interior and the President of the United States. The action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the Administrative Procedure Act, the Declaratory Judgments Act, and the IGRA and is principally directed at the decision by the NIGC Chairman, on January 20, 2009, to approve the Seneca Nation’s amendments to its Class III Gaming Ordinance regarding the Nation’s Buffalo Creek Territory. The NIGC Chairman concluded that IGRA’s general prohibition against gaming on lands acquired after its enactment in 1988 does not apply to lands, such as the Buffalo Creek Territory, that are held in restricted fee. The plaintiffs claim that, in approving the Nation’s Class III Gaming ordinance on January 20, 2009, the NIGC ~~Chairman~~ Chairman ignored the intention of Congress. The plaintiffs also make several claims that go beyond their prior lawsuits. Most notably, they challenge the constitutionality of the land purchase provisions contained in the Seneca Nation Lands Claim Settlement Act of 1990, or (“SNLCSA”), and attempt to challenge in a more extensive fashion than they had previously the validity of the Nation-State Gaming Compact.

On March 30, 2010, the Court denied the Nation’s motion to intervene, while granting permission for it to participate as amicus curiae. The Court also dismissed certain secondary claims of the plaintiffs in the proceeding, while allowing other core claims regarding the eligibility of the land for casino gaming to proceed. If On May 18, 2010, the Nation filed a notice of interlocutory appeal with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on the issue of its right to intervene. If the plaintiffs ultimately succeed in this action, or in their pending appeals in the CACGEC I and CACGEC II proceedings (previous suits filed by the plaintiffs and relating to similar claims), the SGC may be unable to conduct any Class III gaming at its existing properties.

In the matter of the Petition of New York State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation (NYS Supreme Court, Niagara County)

Table of Contents

Seneca Gaming Corporation v. Harvest Trends, Inc. et al. (NYS Supreme Court, Niagara County)

On April 1, 2010, SGC filed suit in the State of New York Supreme Court, County of Niagara, against Harvest Trends, Inc., Harvest Trends LLP, River Lee International, Inc., and several individuals who are former employees of SGC. The suit alleges that these former employees and a vendor, who had been hired and paid to assist SGC in creating an enterprise data warehouse, used SGC time and SGC resources to develop Harvest Trends, an entity created to market a similar product to SGC’s competitors. SGC is suing for damages in in an amount to be determined and for injunctive relief for the ~~misappropriation~~ misappropriation of trade secret customer data, unjust enrichment, unfair competition, breaches of fiduciary duties and duties of loyalty, and breaches of contracts. In On ~~addition, on May~~July 613, 2010, ~~SGC initiated~~four aof ~~proceeding~~the defendants in ~~Niagara~~the ~~Falls~~above ~~seeking~~referenced ~~binding~~case ~~arbitration~~filed separate counter-suits against ~~Rajat~~ ~~Shah~~SGC and 20 other parties, including executives and members of SGC’s ~~former~~Board ~~Senior~~of ~~Vice~~Directors ~~President~~and ofpersonnel ~~Corporate~~employed ~~Development~~by ~~and~~the SGA. ~~General~~These ~~Counsel~~suits, brought in ~~connection~~the ~~with~~State ~~his~~of ~~alleged~~New ~~involvement~~York ~~with~~Supreme ~~the~~Court, ~~employees~~County of Niagara, ~~and~~allege ~~entities~~defamation, ~~involved~~intentional ininfliction ~~the~~of ~~lawsuit~~emotional ~~described~~distress, ~~above~~product disparagement, ~~seeking~~unfair ~~damages~~competition, intortious aninterference with prospective ~~amount~~business toadvantage, beabuse ~~determined~~of process and ~~injunctive~~aiding ~~relief~~and ~~for~~abetting ~~breach~~these activities. Each of ~~his~~these ~~employment agreement,~~complaints ~~breaches~~seeks in excess of ~~fiduciary~~$100 ~~duty~~million ~~and~~in damages. SGC ~~duty~~believes ofthat ~~loyalty~~these actions are without merit, and ~~diversion~~intends to ofdefend ~~corporate opportunity~~itself against these actions vigorously.

Seneca Niagara Falls Gaming Corporation and Seneca Gaming Corporation v. Toohey, et. al. (NYS Supreme Court, Niagara County)

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our results of operations and financial condition are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our 2009 Form 10-K. The risk factors identified therein have not materially changed.

4049

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)		Exhibits (listed according to the number assigned in the table in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Certification of Catherine Walker, principal executive officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
31.2		Certification of David Sheridan, principal financial officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
32.1		Certification of Catherine Walker, principal executive officer, and David Sheridan, principal financial officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

(a)

Exhibits (listed according to the number assigned in the table in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

Exhibit No.		Description

10.1		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2010, by and between Seneca Gaming Corporation and Lee K. Shannon (filed herewith).

31.1		Certification of Catherine Walker, principal executive officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).

31.2		Certification of David Sheridan, principal financial officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).

32.1		Certification of Catherine Walker, principal executive officer, and David Sheridan, principal financial officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	SENECA GAMING CORPORATION
Date: May 7, 2010	/s/ Catherine Walker
Date: August 6, 2010	/s/ Catherine Walker
	Catherine Walker
	Chief Operating Officer
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 7, 2010	/s/ David Sheridan
Date: August 6, 2010	/s/ David Sheridan
	David Sheridan
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

4251

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description
10.1		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2010, by and between Seneca Gaming Corporation and Lee K. Shannon (filed herewith).
31.1		Certification of Catherine Walker, principal executive officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
31.2		Certification of David Sheridan, principal financial officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
32.1		Certification of Catherine Walker, principal executive officer, and David Sheridan, principal financial officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

4352

Filing Compare · Seneca Gaming Corp