UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File No.: 000-20698

BROOKTROUT, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

MASSACHUSETTS		04-2814792
(State or Other Jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation or Organization)		Identification No.)

250 FIRST AVENUE, NEEDHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 02494

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (781) 449-4100

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for other such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o

As of July 29, 2005, 12,752,143 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

BROOKTROUT, INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Overview
	Application of Critical Accounting Policies
	Results of Operations
	Liquidity and Capital Resources
	Recent Accounting Pronouncement
	Factors That May Affect Future Results
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2.	Unregistred Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 6.	Exhibits
	Signatures
	Exhibit Index

“BROOKTROUT” and the “NEW NETWORK” are trademarks or registered trademarks of Brooktrout, Inc.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

BROOKTROUT, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,721		$	18,452
Marketable debt securities	36,269			34,250
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns of $749 at June 30, 2005 and $1,048 at December 31, 2004	9,284			10,346
Inventory	5,413			4,118
Income tax receivable	236			810
Deferred tax assets	3,289			3,286
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,674			2,096

Total current assets	70,886			73,358

Equipment and furniture, less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $17,235 at June 30, 2005 and $16,799 at December 31, 2004	2,545			2,477
Deferred tax assets	16,033			15,492
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $10,666 at June 30, 2005 and $9,986 at December 31, 2004	4,979			5,658
Other assets, less accumulated amortization of $2,907 at June 30, 2005 and $2,622 at December 31, 2004	2,169			2,092

Total assets	$	96,612		$	99,077

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	6,707		$	5,776
Accrued expenses	5,493			6,369
Accrued compensation and commissions	2,081			3,093
Accrued warranty costs	1,270			1,248
Customer deposits	658			709

Total current liabilities	16,209			17,195

Long-term liabilities	142			192

Total liabilities	16,351			17,387

Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding, none	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 80,000,000 shares; issued 12,751,490 at June 30, 2005 and 12,786,604 at December 31, 2004	128			128
Additional paid-in capital	64,745			66,065
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(237		)	(143		)
Notes receivable — officers	(9,845		)	(9,845		)
Retained earnings	25,470			25,485

Total stockholders’ equity	80,261			81,690

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	96,612		$	99,077

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROOKTROUT, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Revenue	$	18,654		$	19,193		$	36,504		$	37,886
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product sold	5,895			6,306			11,378			12,274
Research and development	4,265			4,847			9,129			9,332
In-process research and development	—			2,490			—			2,490
Selling, general and administrative	8,452			8,711			16,961			16,829
Total costs and expenses	18,612			22,354			37,468			40,925

Operating income (loss)	42			(3,161		)	(964		)	(3,039		)
Other income, net	325			117			645			299

Income (loss) before income taxes	367			(3,044		)	(319		)	(2,740		)
Income tax (benefit) provision	(106		)	(117		)	(304		)	5

Net income (loss)	$	473		$	(2,927	)	$	(15	)	$	(2,745	)

Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted	$	0.04		$	(0.22	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.21	)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic	12,709			13,020			12,737			12,937
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted	13,428			13,020			12,737			12,937

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROOKTROUT, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Net income (loss)	$	473		$	(2,927	)	$	(15	)	$	(2,745	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable debt securities, net of tax	37			(109		)	(17		)	(112		)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(33		)	(15		)	(77		)	(12		)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)	4			(124		)	(94		)	(124		)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	477		$	(3,051	)	$	(109	)	$	(2,869	)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROOKTROUT, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(15	)	$	(2,745	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	1,357			1,260
Amortization of acquired and licensed software	285			349
Tax benefit from stock option activity	404			—
Inventory obsolescence expense	129			275
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns	117			33
Deferred income taxes	(158		)	(50		)
In-process research and development	—			2,490
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in:
Accounts receivable	945			1,188
Inventory	(1,424		)	(142		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	678			365
Current and long-term liabilities	(1,036		)	(1,083		)

Cash flows from operating activities	1,282			1,940

Cash flows from investing activities:
Maturities of marketable debt securities	13,617			7,652
Sales of marketable debt securities	1,749			6,811
Purchases of marketable debt securities	(17,413		)	(15,698		)
Expenditures for equipment and furniture	(746		)	(678		)
Expenditures for purchased and licensed software	(496		)	(599		)
Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired	—			(8,255		)

Cash flows from investing activities	(3,289		)	(10,767		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Exercises of stock options, net of common stock received	978			2,982
Repurchase of the Company’s common stock	(2,702		)	(854		)

Cash flows from financing activities	(1,724		)	2,128

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(3,731		)	(6,699		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	18,452			28,081

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	14,721		$	21,382

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Tax payments	$	60		$	43
Tax refunds received	$	619		$	323

Non-cash activities:
Common stock received for exercise of stock options	$	—		$	37

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROOKTROUT, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices

(a) Description of Business

Brooktrout, Inc. (the “Company” or “Brooktrout”) develops, manufactures and sells software and hardware products that enable the development of communications systems and services. The Company sells its products to system vendors, service providers, enterprise customers, original equipment manufacturers, and value-added resellers, both domestically and internationally, through a direct sales force and a two-tiered distribution system.

(b) Use of Estimates

Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and are based upon management’s current judgments. These policies, methods, and estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. The judgments made by management are based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and assumptions about future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company’s management evaluates these estimates and assumptions and adjusts them if expectations concerning events, including future events, affecting them differ markedly from management’s current judgments.

(c) Principles of Consolidation

The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of interim periods presented. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that could be expected for the full year.

(d) Revenue Recognition

Revenue from product sales is recognized when the risk of loss and title pass to the customer, generally at the time of shipment, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. To the extent that one or more of these conditions are not met, which has occurred from time-to-time, revenue is deferred until such time as all four criteria are met. Revenue from sales to certain distributors is recognized on a “sell-through” basis, that is, when the distributors report to the Company that resale of the product to the ultimate customer of the distributor has occurred. If the Company receives a payment from a customer prior to meeting all of the revenue recognition criteria, the payment is recorded as a customer deposit or deferred revenue. In addition, customers are offered the option to enter into maintenance contracts on selected products that are renewable. Prepaid maintenance fees on these contracts are deferred and recognized evenly over the term of the maintenance contract.

The Company records a provision for estimated sales returns and allowances as a deduction from sales in the same period that the related revenue is recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data and other known factors. In addition, the Company periodically offers rebate programs to customers that require the Company to estimate the cost of the program. The Company records a provision for the estimated cost of the program as a deduction from sales based on or upon the results of previous rebate programs and other known factors.

(e) Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company holds its temporary cash, cash equivalents, and marketable debt securities in highly rated financial instruments and with highly rated financial institutions. In addition, the Company’s investment policy limits its exposure to concentrations of credit risk by requiring diversification of investments in debt securities.

The Company sells its products to various customers in the high technology industry. The Company generally requires no collateral. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs credit evaluations of its customers. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from its customers’ inability to make required payments. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 14% and 19%, respectively, of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer. A second customer represented 14% and 9% of the Company’s accounts receivable at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

The Company has one customer that generates more than 10% of total revenue. This customer accounted for approximately 19% and 15% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, this same customer accounted for approximately 18% and 16% of revenue, respectively.

(f) Stock-Based Compensation

The Company uses the intrinsic value method to measure compensation expense associated with the grants of stock options or awards to employees. The Company accounts for stock options and awards to non-employees using the fair value method.

Under the intrinsic value method, compensation associated with stock awards to employees is determined as the excess, if any, of the current fair value of the underlying common stock on the date compensation is measured over the price an employee must pay to exercise the award. The measurement date for employee awards is generally the date of grant. Under the fair value method, compensation associated with stock awards to non-employees is determined based on the estimated fair value of the award itself, measured using either current market data or an established option pricing model. The measurement date for non-employee awards is generally the date that performance of certain services is complete.

Had the Company used the fair value method to measure compensation related to stock awards to employees, reported net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common share would have been as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(in thousands, except per share data)

Net income (loss), as reported	$	473		$	(2,927	)	$	(15	)	$	(2,745	)
Stock-based compensation recorded	—			—			—			—
Pro forma stock-based compensation, net of tax	(995		)	(1,094		)	(2,000		)	(2,481		)

Net loss, pro forma	$	(522	)	$	(4,021	)	$	(2,015	)	$	(5,226	)

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted pro forma	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.40	)

Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted as reported	$	0.04		$	(0.22	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.21	)

Basic weighted average shares outstanding were used in calculating the pro forma net loss per common share in each of the periods presented since the use of diluted weighted average shares outstanding would have had an anti-dilutive effect.

For purposes of determining the disclosures provided above, the fair value of options from the Company’s stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan on their grant date, considered to be the measurement date, was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Key assumptions used to apply this pricing model were as follows:

	2005				2004
	Stock Option Plans		Employee Stock Purchase Plan		Stock Option Plans		Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Risk-free interest rate	3.6	%	3.3	%	4.1	%	1.6	%
Expected life of option grants (years)	5.2		0.5		5.6		0.5
Expected volatility of underlying stock	79	%	42	%	87	%	84	%
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%	0	%	0	%

The estimated weighted average fair value of option grants made from the Company’s stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan, per option, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004

Stock option plans	$	6.79	$	8.03	$	7.76	$	8.54
Employee stock purchase plan	$	1.20	$	2.42	$	1.20	$	2.42

(g) Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive securities had been issued, using the treasury method, if such shares have a dilutive effect.

A reconciliation of weighted average shares used for the basic and diluted computations is as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005	2004	2005	2004
	(in thousands)

Weighted average shares for basic	12,709	13,020	12,737	12,937
Dilutive effect of stock options	719	—	—	—

Weighted average shares for diluted	13,428	13,020	12,737	12,937

Stock options to purchase approximately 1,509,000 shares and 4,026,000 shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, certain stock options were excluded because the exercise price of the stock options exceeds the average market price of the Company’s common stock and, as a result, would have had an anti-dilutive effect. As a result of the net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2005, all outstanding stock options were excluded because of their anti-dilutive effect.

Stock options to purchase approximately 3,626,000 shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. As a result of the net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, all outstanding stock options were excluded because of their anti-dilutive effect.

(h) New Accounting Standard

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), which revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supercedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and its related interpretations. In April 2005, the SEC announced the adoption of a rule that defers the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application method. Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will increase stock compensation expense. The actual impact on future years will be dependant on a number of factors, including the Company’s stock price and the level of future grants and awards made from the Company’s stock-based compensation plans. The pro forma effect on the Company’s financial results using a fair value based approach is disclosed in Note 1(f), “Stock-Based Compensation.” The pro forma effects disclosed are not necessarily representative of the effects on the results of operations in the future for the reasons provided above.

2. Marketable Debt Securities

Marketable debt securities consisted of the following:

	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Market Value
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2005:
U.S. government notes and bonds	$	11,957	$	3	$	(73	)	$	11,887
Corporate debt securities	24,492		3		(113		)	24,382

Total	$	36,449	$	6	$	(186	)	$	36,269

December 31, 2004:
U.S. government notes and bonds	$	12,864	$	—	$	(61	)	$	12,803
Corporate debt securities	20,783		—		(90		)	20,693
Foreign investments	755		—		(1		)	754

Total	$	34,402	$	—	$	(152	)	$	34,250

The unrealized losses related to these securities at June 30, 2005 are not material to the Company’s financial position or results from operations and is not considered to be a permanent decline in the market value of such securities.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of marketable debt securities at June 30, 2005, by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to repay the obligations without prepayment penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Market Value
	(in thousands)
Marketable debt securities:
Due in one year or less	$	22,527	$	22,420
Due after one year through five years	13,922		13,849

Total	$	36,449	$	36,269

Realized gains and losses from the sale of marketable debt securities were not material to the Company’s results from operations in any of the periods presented.

3. Inventory

The components of inventory, net of reserves, are as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2005		2004
	(in thousands)

Raw materials	$	955	$	724
Work in process	465		537
Finished goods	3,993		2,857

Total	$	5,413	$	4,118

The following is a rollforward of reserves provided for inventory obsolescence:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(in thousands)

Balance, beginning of period	$	2,943		$	4,379
Provisions	129			275
Write offs	(658		)	(1,059		)
Other	—			29

Balance, end of period	$	2,414		$	3,624

4. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns:

The following is a rollforward of allowances provided for doubtful accounts and sales returns:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(in thousands)

Balance, beginning of period	$	1,048		$	843
Provisions	117			33
Write-offs	(1		)	(27		)
Recoveries	9			42
Rebate payments to customers	(424		)	(118		)
Other	—			74

Balance, end of period	$	749		$	847

Accrued warranty costs:

The following is a rollforward of accrued warranty costs:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(in thousands)

Balance, beginning of period	$	1,248		$	1,138
Provisions for claims	257			164
Claims incurred	(235		)	(117		)
Other	—			12

Balance, end of period	$	1,270		$	1,197

5. Stockholders’ Equity

On October 20, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a program for the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Under this program, shares may be repurchased prior to October 19, 2005 and in such amounts as market conditions warrant, and subject to regulatory and other considerations. The Company plans to use the shares repurchased under these programs for general corporate purposes, including the Company’s stock option plans, employee stock purchase plan and other stock benefit plans. The Company repurchased 211,530 shares for approximately $2.7 million under these programs during the six months ended June 30, 2005.

6. Segment Reporting

The Company develops, manufactures and sells software and hardware products that enable the development of communications systems and services. The Company sells its products to system vendors, service providers, enterprise customers, original equipment manufacturers, and value-added resellers, both domestically and internationally, through a direct sales force and a two-tiered distribution system. The Company has one operating segment. The Company’s products, while designed for different customers and different principal markets, otherwise have similar economic characteristics.

Geographic Information – Revenues are derived from the following geographic areas; international sales are principally exports from the United States:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004

United States	80	%	81	%	79	%	79	%
International	20		19		21		21

	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

Substantially all of our assets are located within the United States.

7. Commitments and Contingencies

From time-to-time, the Company is a party to legal and other actions, which may include allegations of patent infringement made against us and/or our customers, which arise in the normal course of business. The Company, taking into account advice of counsel, does not currently believe the eventual outcome of any such pending or potential matters, including matters in which we may have an obligation on behalf of our customers, will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including those set forth below under “Factors That May Affect Future Results.”

Overview

We develop software and hardware platforms that original equipment manufacturers, developers, network operators and corporate information technology managers build into their communications systems. Customers incorporate our products into applications, systems and services that allow voice, fax and data to be distributed over both IP packet-based networks, which we refer to as the New Network, and the traditional circuit-switched telephone network. We supply products for media processing, network interface, call control and signal processing, including protocols that allow Internet and traditional telephony systems to communicate. Our strategy is to partner with our customers and collaborate closely with them to accelerate their delivery of new applications and services to end-users, help increase their existing business, and expand into new markets. In April 2004, we completed our acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock of SnowShore Networks, Inc., or SnowShore, a provider of voice over IP, or VOIP, communications infrastructure products for the media server market.

We measure our operating success using both financial and market metrics. The financial metrics include revenue, gross profit, operating expenses, operating income and net income, as well as working capital and cash flows from operating activities. Key market metrics include the total number of customers, the number of customers whose purchases exceed $100,000, and the portion of our revenue that is generated by the sales of products to enterprise and service provider customers. Our long-term business model stresses our commitment to establishing and maintaining close customer relationships, increasing penetration of the telecommunications markets that we serve and continuing to develop innovative products.

The most significant trend that has impacted our business during the past few years has been the unfavorable economic conditions affecting the communications industry. During the past few years we continued to invest in developing products that we believe our customers will need when the economy recovers. We are now seeing signs that the economic conditions in our industry may be improving with modest revenue growth from 2002 to 2003 and further growth from 2003 to 2004. Many companies that had reduced their capital expenditures during the recent economic downturn have begun to invest again in their communications networks. The evolution and acceptance of the New Network is contributing to these infrastructure investments as enterprises and service providers begin to use the IP networks for fax and VOIP transmissions.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We make estimates and assumptions in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We consider the following to be the critical accounting policies and areas where significant judgment is applied, which we believe an investor should understand when assessing our financial reporting and performance:

• Revenue recognition;

• Allowances for doubtful accounts;

• Inventory allowances;

• Intangible assets;

• Income taxes; and

• Accrued warranty costs.

This listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our significant accounting policies. For further information on our critical accounting policies, and on our significant accounting policies in general, we refer the reader to the discussion of those policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and to Note 1 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Results of Operations

The following discussion focuses on our results of operations. The table below sets forth certain unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations data as percentages of total revenue for the periods presented.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004

Revenue	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

Cost of product sold	32		33		31		32
Gross profit	68		67		69		68

Operating expenses:
Research and development	23		25		25		25
In-process research and development	—		13		—		7
Selling, general and administrative	45		45		47		44
Total operating expenses	68		83		72		76

Operating income (loss)	—		(16	)	(3	)	(8	)
Other income, net	2		—		2		1

Income (loss) before income taxes	2		(16	)	(1	)	(7	)
Income tax (benefit) provision	(1	)	(1	)	(1	)	—

Net income (loss)	3	%	(15	)%	—	%	(7	)%

Revenue

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our domestic and international revenue:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005				2004
	(dollars in thousands)

United States	$	14,852	80	%	$	15,606	81	%
International, principally exports	3,802		20		3,587		19

Total revenue	$	18,654	100	%	$	19,193	100	%

Revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $18.7 million compared to $19.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $0.5 million or approximately 3%. The decrease in the second quarter of 2005, compared with the second quarter of 2004 was due to lower sales to original equipment manufacturers and service providers, primarily in North America. The reduction in these sales was offset, in part, by higher sales to value-added resellers and enterprise customers. The decrease in sales to original equipment manufacturers and service providers was primarily the result of weakness in our traditional circuit-switched telephone networks, or TDM, voice and data products that we believe was caused by fewer implementations of this older technology as our customers are anticipating a migration to IP-based technology in the future. In comparison to the three months ended June 30, 2004, international revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased by $0.2 million due primarily to higher sales to Japanese customers of $0.4 million offset, in part, by lower sales to European customers of $0.3 million.

In the three months ended June 30, 2005, revenue from enterprise customers accounted for approximately 85% of total revenue, as compared to 83% of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The remaining revenue in each quarter was attributable to service provider customers. Revenue from Captaris, Inc. accounted for 19% of total revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 15% in the three months ended June 30, 2004. We expect that revenue from Captaris, Inc. will be greater than 10% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005.

In the three months ended June 30, 2005, 28 of our customers each purchased over $100,000 of products, in aggregate representing 78% of total revenue for the quarter. In the three months ended June 30, 2004, 31 of our customers each purchased over $100,000 of products, in aggregate representing 75% of total revenue for the quarter. Total customers in the second quarter of 2005 increased to approximately 325 from approximately 315 in the second quarter of 2004.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our domestic and international revenue:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005				2004
	(dollars in thousands)

United States	$	28,685	79	%	$	29,941	79	%
International, principally exports	7,819		21		7,945		21

Total revenue	$	36,504	100	%	$	37,886	100	%

Revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $36.5 million compared to $37.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $1.4 million, or approximately 4%. The decrease in the first half of 2005, compared with the first half of 2004 was due to lower sales to original equipment manufacturers and service providers, primarily in North America. The reduction in these sales was offset, in part, by higher sales to value-added resellers and enterprise customers. The decrease in sales to original equipment manufacturers and service providers was primarily the result of the weakness in our TDM voice and data products described above. In comparison to the six months ended June 30, 2004, international revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased by $0.1 million due primarily to lower sales to European customers of $0.8 million. The decreases in sales to European customers were offset, in part, by higher sales to Japanese customers of $0.4 million and to Central and Latin American customers of $0.2 million.

In the six months ended June 30, 2005, revenue from enterprise customers accounted for approximately 86% of total revenue, as compared to 84% of total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The remaining revenue in each period was attributable to service provider customers. Revenue from Captaris, Inc. accounted for 18% of total revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 16% in the six months ended June 30, 2004.

In the six months ended June 30, 2005, 51 of our customers each purchased over $100,000 of products, in aggregate representing 82% of total revenue for the period. In the six months ended June 30, 2004, 59 of our customers each purchased over $100,000 of products, in aggregate representing 84% of total revenue for the period. Total customers in both the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 were approximately 440.

Cost of Product Sold and Gross Profit

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents cost of product sold and gross profit information:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(dollars in thousands)

Cost of product sold	$	5,895		$	6,306
Gross profit	$	12,759		$	12,887
Gross profit as a percentage of total revenue	68		%	67		%

The decrease in cost of product sold in the three months ended June 30, 2005, compared with the three months ended June 30, 2004 was due primarily to the lower sales of TDM voice and data products described above. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2004 is a result of changes in product mix. Gross profit for the third quarter of 2005 is expected to be approximately 68% to 70% of total revenue.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents cost of product sold and gross profit information:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(dollars in thousands)

Cost of product sold	$	11,378		$	12,274
Gross profit	$	25,126		$	25,612
Gross profit as a percentage of total revenue	69		%	68		%

The decrease in cost of product sold in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with the six months ended June 30, 2004 was due primarily to the lower sales of TDM voice and data products described above. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2004 is a result of changes in product mix.

Operating Expenses

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our operating expenses:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004
	(in thousands)

Research and development	$	4,265	$	4,847
In-process research and development	—		2,490
Selling, general and administrative	8,452		8,711

Total operating expenses	$	12,717	$	16,048

Research and development expense

Research and development expense represented 23% of revenue in the second quarter of 2005, compared with 25% in the second quarter of 2004. The $0.6 million decrease in research and development expenses in the second quarter of 2005 compared with the second quarter of 2004 was due primarily to lower consulting expenses of $0.4 million and lower salary related expenses of $0.2 million. Our continuing development efforts are focused on software and hardware for traditional circuit-switched telephone networks and IP media processing products (voice, video, fax and data), network interface products, call control products and signal processing products. Research and development expense for the third quarter of 2005 is expected to be approximately 22% to 25% of revenue.

In-process research and development

We recorded a one-time charge of $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2004 for purchased in-process technology related to SnowShore development projects that had not yet reached technological feasibility, had no alternative future use, and for which successful development was uncertain at the date of acquisition. The value of the purchased in-process research and development was computed by determining the present value of the project’s future economic benefits from future revenues net of anticipated costs and expenses. At the time of the acquisition, the projects were approximately 40% complete. As of June 30, 2005, these projects were substantially complete.

Selling, general and administrative expense

Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 45% of revenue in the second quarters of 2005 and 2004. The $0.3 million decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2005 compared with the second quarter of 2004 was due primarily to lower salary related expenses of $0.4 million and lower consulting expenses of $0.2 million offset, in part, by increased legal, audit and other professional fees of $0.3 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2005 are expected to be approximately 38% to 40% of revenue.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our operating expenses:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004
	(in thousands)

Research and development	$	9,129	$	9,332
In-process research and development	—		2,490
Selling, general and administrative	16,961		16,829

Total operating expenses	$	26,090	$	28,651

Research and development expense

Research and development expense represented 25% of revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004. The $0.2 million decrease in research and development expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2004 was due primarily to lower salary related expenses of $0.5 million and reduced spending on product prototypes of $0.1 million offset, in part, by an increase in consulting expenses of $0.3 million.

In-process research and development

We recorded a one-time charge of $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2004 related to the purchase of in-process technology described above.

Selling, general and administrative expense

Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 47% of revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with 44% in the six months ended June 30, 2004. The $0.1 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2004 was due primarily to increased legal, audit and other professional fees of $0.6 million, an increase in bad debt expense of $0.2 million and an increase in depreciation expense of $0.1 million. The increases in selling, general and administrative expenses were offset, in part, by lower salary related expenses of $0.3 million, lower consulting expenses of $0.3 million and lower facility-related expenses of $0.2 million.

Other income, net

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our other income, net:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004
	(in thousands)

Other income, net	$	325	$	117

The change in other income, net from the three months ended June 30, 2004 to the three months ended June 30, 2005 was due primarily to an increase in interest income. The increase in interest income related to higher average interest rates on our marketable debt securities offset, in part, by lower average cash, cash equivalents and marketable debt securities.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our other income, net:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004
	(in thousands)

Other income, net	$	645	$	299

The change in other income, net from the six months ended June 30, 2004 to the six months ended June 30, 2005 was due primarily to an increase in interest income. The increase in interest income related to higher average interest rates on our marketable debt securities offset, in part, by lower average cash, cash equivalents and marketable debt securities.

Income tax (benefit) provision

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our income tax (benefit) provision and effective tax rate:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(dollars in thousands)

Income tax (benefit) provision	$	(106	)	$	(117	)
Effective tax rate	(29		)%	4		%

The tax benefit in the three months ended June 30, 2005 differed from the statutory tax rate as a result of a favorable settlement related to state tax obligations from prior periods and the release of related reserves. Excluding the impact of this item, the effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was 41%. The annual effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2005 is expected to be approximately 41% to 43%.

The tax benefit in the three months ended June 30, 2004 differed from the statutory tax rate as a result of the disproportionate relationship between permanent taxable items and our forecasted pre-tax income (loss). Excluding the impact of the in-process research and development charge recorded in the second quarter of 2004, which is not deductible for tax purposes due to the nature of the SnowShore acquisition, the effective tax rate was 21%.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

The following table presents our income tax (benefit) provision and effective tax rate:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(dollars in thousands)

Income tax (benefit) provision	$	(304	)	$	5
Effective tax rate	95		%	0		%

The tax benefit in the six months ended June 30, 2005 differed from the statutory tax rate as a result of the settlement described above offset by additional tax expense recorded in the first quarter of 2005 that resulted from the filing of amended tax returns associated with prior periods. Excluding the impact of these items, the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 42%.

The tax provision in the six months ended June 30, 2004 differed from the statutory tax rate as a result of the disproportionate relationship between permanent taxable items and our forecasted pre-tax income (loss). Excluding the impact of the in-process research and development charge recorded in the second quarter of 2004, which is not deductible for tax purposes due to the nature of the SnowShore acquisition, the effective tax rate was 2%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

Cash from operating activities was $1.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. This resulted primarily from our net loss adjusted for non-cash expenses, such as depreciation and amortization, that do not require current expenditures of cash and a decrease in accounts receivable offset, in part, by an increase in inventory. Cash flows from operating activities were $1.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004. This resulted primarily from our net loss adjusted for non-cash expenses and a decrease in accounts receivable offset, in part, by a decrease in current liabilities.

Cash used in investing activities was $3.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. This resulted from net purchases of marketable debt securities of $2.0 million, expenditures for capital equipment of $0.7 million and the purchase and license of technology for $0.5 million. Cash flows used in investing activities were $10.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004. This resulted from a net decrease in cash of $8.3 million as a result of the SnowShore acquisition, net purchases of marketable debt securities of $1.2 million, expenditures for capital equipment of $0.7 million and the purchase and license of technology for $0.6 million.

Cash used in financing activities was $1.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. This resulted from $2.7 million used to repurchase shares of our common stock offset, in part, by $1.0 million of proceeds received from the sale of common stock to our employees under stock option and employee stock purchase plans. Cash flows from financing activities were $2.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004. This resulted from $3.0 million of proceeds received from the sale of common stock to our employees under stock option and employee stock purchase plans offset, in part, by $0.9 million used to repurchase shares of our common stock.

Cash and Cash Liquidity Position

The following table presents our cash and liquidity position as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2005		2004
	(dollars in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,721	$	18,452
Marketable debt securities	36,269		34,250

Total	$	50,990	$	52,702

Working capital	$	54,677	$	56,163
Quick ratio	3.7		3.7
Maximum available line of credit	$	5,000	$	5,000

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable debt securities decreased to $51.0 million as of June 30, 2005 from $52.7 million as of December 31, 2004. This resulted primarily from the use of $2.7 million to repurchase shares of our common stock offset, in part, by $1.0 million of proceeds received from the sale of common stock to our employees under stock option and employee stock purchase plans. Working capital decreased by $1.5 million from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005 for the same reasons.

Our quick ratio was 3.7 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The quick ratio is generally considered to be an indicator of a company’s ability to meet its short-term financial obligations. Quick ratio is computed as cash and cash equivalents, marketable debt securities and accounts receivable divided by current liabilities.

Our line of credit was with a commercial bank and provided for a maximum commitment of $5.0 million through July 29, 2005. Borrowings under the line of credit would have borne interest at the lender’s prime rate and we paid a commitment fee on unused commitments. Borrowings under the line of credit were collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of our assets and the availability of funds under the line of credit was subject to compliance with certain financial covenants relating to our quick ratio, minimum tangible net worth and other standard reporting requirements. We are currently in the process of renewing the line of credit and based on this process we expect to complete the renewal in August 2005 on substantially the same terms as outlined above. There were no borrowings outstanding under the line of credit on July 29, 2005, June 30, 2005 or at December 31, 2004. At June 30, 2005, approximately $0.1 million of the line of credit was pledged as security for certain forward currency contracts.

On October 20, 2004, our board of directors authorized a program for the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. Under this program, shares may be repurchased prior to October 19, 2005 and in such amounts as market conditions warrant, subject to regulatory and other considerations. We plan to use the shares repurchased under this program for general corporate purposes, including our stock option plans, employee stock purchase plan and other stock benefit plans. We repurchased 211,530 shares for approximately $2.7 million under this program during the first six months of 2005. We repurchased 368,100 shares for approximately $3.4 million under stock repurchase programs during the year ended December 31, 2004.

We expect that our cash and cash equivalents and marketable debt securities will meet our needs for at least the next twelve months; however, we are always looking for opportunities to expand our business, which could include acquisitions or organic expansion into new markets. If we find that our cash and cash equivalent and marketable debt securities are not sufficient, we may choose to utilize or to seek other sources of financing. If we were to seek future equity financings, the terms may be dilutive to our stockholders and may contain restrictive covenants, which could limit our ability to pursue certain courses of action. It is possible that, should the need arise, we will not be able to obtain additional financing, or that the financing made available to us will not be on acceptable terms.

Contractual Obligations and Capital Expenditures

The following table presents our future contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2005:

	Total		Remainder of 2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		Thereafter
	(in thousands)

Operating leases	$	3,606	$	1,325	$	1,110	$	389	$	389	$	275	$	118

We have operating lease commitments for our primary office and manufacturing facilities that expire in 2006. We have operating lease commitments for our sales and support functions that expire at various dates between 2006 and 2010. Some of these leases contain renewal options ranging from three to ten years. Certain lease agreements require us to pay all of the building’s taxes, insurance and maintenance costs.

We purchased $0.7 million of capital equipment in both the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004. We expect to purchase approximately $0.5 million of capital equipment in the remainder of 2005. In addition, our leases for certain properties in Needham, Massachusetts will expire in March 2006, and we are currently assessing alternatives for leasing various available facilities, including our current facilities. Depending on the facility and arrangements that we ultimately select, we may be required to expend funds for capital improvements beginning in the second half of 2005. We do not expect that our funding of any such capital improvements will have a material effect on our cash position.

We have certain inventory purchase commitments that are part of our ordinary course of business. The term of these inventory purchase commitments typically do not exceed six months. We do not expect these short-term commitments to have a material impact on our financial results.

Inflation

The pricing of our products and the costs of our goods can be significantly affected by current market conditions. Market conditions can be impacted by inflation; however, we believe that inflation has not had a significant effect on our operations to date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” or SFAS No. 123(R), which revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supercedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and its related interpretations. In April 2005, the SEC announced the adoption of a rule that defers the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We expect to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application method. Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will increase stock compensation expense. The actual impact on future years will depend on a number of factors, including our stock price and the level of future grants and awards made from our stock-based compensation plans. We disclose the pro forma effect on our financial results using a fair value based approach in Note 1(f), “Stock-Based Compensation,” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The pro forma effects disclosed are not necessarily representative of the effects on the results of operations in the future for the reasons provided above.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect us. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these factors. You should also refer to the other information in this report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may become important factors that affect us.

Risks Related to Our Business

Downturns in the economy generally, and in sectors of the telecommunications industry in particular, make it difficult to anticipate or expand sales.

As a result of the uncertain economic conditions that have affected most technology sectors and the telecommunications sector in particular, over the past few years many of our customers have aggressively sought to increase efficiency in their supply chains and reduce their inventory levels. Additionally, the slowdown in the telecommunications industry and the resulting decrease in spending by companies in our target markets have limited the rate of growth of data traffic and the use of the Internet, which are driving the convergence of data and telephony that we expect will give rise to demand for New Network applications. The economic downturn adversely affected our business and operating results for the first two quarters of 2003, and even more so for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. While economic conditions have improved somewhat, if current economic conditions do not continue to improve or if they worsen, we may experience additional adverse effects on our revenue, net income and cash flow. For example, if the rate at which our customers order product decreases, it becomes more likely that our current inventories would be exposed to technological obsolescence, which would require us to reduce the value of those inventories on our balance sheet.

If we fail to compete successfully in the highly competitive telecommunications market, our revenue and profitability will suffer.

The market for telecommunications equipment is highly competitive. If we are unable to differentiate our products from existing and future offerings of our competitors, and thereby effectively compete in the market for telecommunications equipment, our operating results could be materially adversely affected. Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater selling and marketing, technical, manufacturing, financial and other resources than we have. We expect our current competitors to continue to improve the design and performance of their existing products and to introduce new products and enhancements with improved price and performance characteristics. New technologies, products or market trends may threaten our product sales, and we may have to reduce the prices of our products to stay competitive or we may not have the resources required to respond to the new technologies, products or market trends. In addition, new competitors may emerge in the markets we serve. An acquisition of, or by, one of our competitors may result in a substantially strengthened competitor with greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, marketing and customer service and support resources than we have. If our current or future competitors enter into strategic relationships with leading manufacturers covering products similar to those sold or being developed by us, our ability to sell products to those manufacturers may be adversely affected.

Capitalizing on our technology will require a continued high level of investment in research and development, marketing and customer service and support. We may be unable, or otherwise fail, to allocate sufficient resources to achieve the technological advances necessary to compete successfully with existing competitors or new entrants.

Internal development efforts by our customers may adversely affect demand for our products.

Many of our customers and partners, including the large original equipment manufacturers on which we focus a significant portion of our sales and marketing efforts, have the technical and financial ability to design and produce components replicating or improving on the functionality of most of our products. These customers often consider in-house development of technologies and products as an alternative to doing business with us. We cannot guarantee that our existing or potential customers will do business with us, rather than attempting to develop similar technology and products internally or obtaining technology or products through acquisitions. We cannot be certain that we will be able to find customers to replace the revenue lost as a result of customers developing technologies or products in-house. Any such occurrence could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

If we fail to develop and sell new or enhanced products for the telecommunications hardware and software market, we will not be able to compete effectively.

The telecommunications hardware and software market is characterized by:

• rapid technological advances;

• evolving industry standards;

• changes in customer requirements;

• changes in product life cycles, including the shortening life cycle of products in the market;

• frequent new product introductions or innovations;

• declining prices;

• intense competition; and

• evolving offerings by telecommunications service providers.

Our future success depends in large part on our ability to offer products that address the sophisticated and varied needs of our current and prospective customers and to respond to technological advances and evolving industry standards on a timely and cost-effective basis.

The timely development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process. We intend to continue to invest significantly in product and technology development. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing and other difficulties that could delay or prevent our development, introduction or commercialization of any new and enhanced products. In particular, development of new products may require different engineering skills and experience, which our current employees may not possess. We also may not be able to incorporate new technologies on a cost-effective or timely basis, which may result in unexpected expenses. We may not anticipate technological or market trends accurately or manage long development cycles successfully. We may be required to collaborate with third parties to develop products and may not be able to do so on a timely and cost-effective basis, if at all.

The introduction of new or enhanced products also requires that we manage the transition from older products so as to minimize the disruption to customers and ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be delivered to meet anticipated customer demand. If we are unable to develop new products or enhancements on a timely and cost-effective basis, or if the new products or enhancements that we introduce fail to achieve market acceptance, our ability to grow our business would be harmed and competitors could achieve greater market share.

Our future success will depend in part on the continued migration to IP-based networks.

We develop core technology that connects the traditional telephone network, or TDM, to the data network in the fax, enterprise voice and carrier enhanced service markets. In the first half of 2005, we have seen a decline in our traditional TDM voice and data business that we believe was the result of our customers anticipating a migration to IP-based technology. We anticipate that the migration to VOIP will generate the need for new enterprise voice application systems that connect to VOIP networks. We also expect that demand for new fax systems will be driven in part by the transition of many voice networks to VOIP. Moreover, telecommunications carriers are now migrating their infrastructure toward IP-based technologies. As a result, our future success may depend on the timing and extent of the continued migration of our target markets to VOIP and other IP-based networks. This migration is still in a relatively early stage, and the continued migration to VOIP and other IP-based networks depends on various factors that are outside of our control, including concerns of enterprises and carriers regarding capital outlay requirements as well as competitive and regulatory issues. If the migration to IP-based networks does not occur for these or other reasons, or if it occurs more slowly than we expect, our operating results may be harmed.

Our revenue could decline significantly if we lose a major customer or if a major customer cancels, reduces or delays an order.

One customer accounted for 18% of our revenue in the first six months of 2005 and 18% of our revenue in fiscal 2004. We expect this customer to continue to account for more than 10% of our total revenue. The loss of this or any other major customer or the cancellation, reduction or delay of significant orders from such customers, even if only temporary, could significantly reduce our revenue and cash flow and could harm our reputation in the industry.

Our products typically have long sales cycles, causing us to expend significant resources before recognizing revenue.

The length of our sales cycle typically ranges from six to eighteen months and varies substantially from customer to customer. Prospective customers generally must commit significant resources to test and evaluate our products and integrate them into larger systems. This evaluation period is often prolonged due to delays associated with approval processes that typically accompany the design and testing of new communications equipment by our customers.

In addition, the rapidly emerging and evolving nature of the markets in which we and our customers compete may cause prospective customers to delay their purchase decisions as they evaluate new technologies and develop and implement new systems. During the period in which our customers are evaluating whether to place an order with us, we often incur substantial sales and marketing expenses, without any assurance of future orders or their timing. Even after a customer places an order, the timing of the development and introduction of the customer’s product, and in particular the timing of implementation of our product into the customer’s product, are controlled by, and can vary significantly with the needs of, the customer. In some circumstances, the customer will not require the product for several months. This continuing uncertainty can complicate our planning processes and reduce the predictability of our earnings and cash flows.

Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by downturns in economic conditions in countries outside the United States and other risks associated with international operations.

Sales of our products to customers outside the United States accounted for 21% of our revenue in the six months of 2005 and 20% of our revenue in fiscal 2004. We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenue. We are subject to a number of risks as a result of our international sales, including:

• volatility in currency exchange rates;

• political and economic instability in other countries;

• the imposition of trade restrictions, trade barriers, and tariff regulations by foreign governments;

• difficulties in accounts receivable collections;

• extended payment terms beyond those customarily offered in the United States;

• compliance with statutory requirements in many foreign countries;

• potentially adverse tax consequences;

• difficulties in managing and/or expanding operations across disparate geographic areas; and

• interruption in the delivery of our products.

In addition, most countries require technical approvals from their telecommunications regulatory agencies for products that operate in conjunction with the local telephone system. Obtaining these approvals is generally a prerequisite for sales in a given jurisdiction. Obtaining requisite approvals takes from two months to a year or more depending on the product and the jurisdiction. In addition, obtaining these requisite approvals may require modifications to our products. These or other factors may limit our ability to sell our products in other countries, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our dependence on sole and single source suppliers and independent manufacturers could result in increased costs or delays in the manufacture and delivery of our products.

Although we generally use standard parts and components for our products, some key components are purchased from sole or single source vendors for which alternative sources are not currently available or are difficult to obtain. Our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of these components may result in future delays or reductions in product shipments that could cause us to lose sales, incur additional costs and suffer harm to our reputation. We currently purchase proprietary components from a number of suppliers for which there are no direct substitutes.

These components could be replaced with alternatives from other suppliers, but that might require redesign of our products. If such a redesign were required, we would incur considerable delay and expenses. We currently enter into purchase orders with our suppliers for materials based on forecasts of need, but have no guaranteed supply arrangements with these suppliers.

In addition, we currently use independent manufacturers to manufacture printed circuit boards, chassis and subassemblies in accordance with our design and specification. Our reliance on independent manufacturers involves a number of risks, including the potential for inadequate capacity of, unavailability of, or interruptions in access to, process technologies and reduced control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields and costs. If our manufacturers are unable or unwilling to continue manufacturing our components in required quantities or to our quality expectations, we will have to transfer manufacturing to acceptable alternative manufacturers that we identify, which could result in significant delays in shipment of products to customers. Moreover, the manufacture of these components is extremely complex, and our reliance on the suppliers of these components exposes us to potential production difficulties and quality variations, which could negatively affect the cost and timely delivery of our products. We currently enter into purchase orders with independent manufacturers of materials based on forecasts of need, but have no guaranteed capacity arrangements with these manufacturers. Any significant interruption in the supply, or degradation in the quality, of any component could cause us to lose sales, incur additional costs and suffer harm to our reputation.

Defects in our products or problems arising from the use of our products may seriously harm our business and reputation.

Products as complex as ours may contain known and undetected errors, bugs, or other performance problems. Defects are frequently found during the period immediately following introduction and initial implementation of new products or enhancements to existing products. Although it is our objective to resolve all bugs that we believe would be considered serious by our customers before implementation, our products may not be bug-free. We also provide warranties against defects in materials and workmanship on our hardware products for up to five years. Errors, bugs or performance problems could result in lost revenue or customer relationships and could be detrimental to our business and reputation generally. In addition, our customers generally use our products together with their own products and products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. These problems may cause us to incur significant warranty and repair costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts and cause significant customer relations problems.

Changes to regulations affecting the telecommunications or Internet industries could reduce demand for our products or increase our costs.

Laws and regulations governing telecommunications, electronic commerce and the Internet are emerging, but remain largely unsettled, even in the areas where there has been some legislative action. Regulation may focus on, among other things, assessing access or settlement charges, or imposing tariffs or regulations based on the characteristics and quality of products, either of which could restrict our business or increase our cost of doing business. Any changes to existing laws or the adoption of new regulations by federal or state regulatory authorities or any legal challenges to existing laws or regulations relating to the telecommunications industry could materially adversely affect the market for our products. Moreover, our value-added resellers or other customers may require us, or we may otherwise deem it necessary or advisable, to alter our products to address actual or anticipated changes in the regulatory environment. Our inability to alter our products or address any regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Changes in stock option accounting rules may have a significant adverse affect on our operating results.

We have a history of using broad based employee stock option programs to hire, incentivize and retain our workforce in a competitive marketplace. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” allows companies the choice of either using a fair value method of accounting for options that would result in expense recognition for all options granted, or using an intrinsic value method, as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” or APB No. 25, with pro forma disclosure of the impact on net income (loss) of using the fair value option exercise recognition method. We have previously elected to apply APB No. 25 and accordingly, we have not recognized any compensation expense with respect to employee stock options as long as such options are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair value of our common stock on the grant date.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123(R), which would require all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments, including employee stock options, at fair value. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will increase stock compensation expense. The actual impact on future years will depend on a number of factors, including our stock price and the level of future grants and awards made from our stock-based compensation plans. If we had used the fair value method to measure compensation related to stock awards to employees, we would have incurred additional stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, of $2.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and $5.4 million in fiscal 2004. The pro forma effects for 2005 and 2004 are not necessarily representative of the effects on the results of operations in the future.

Limitations on our ability to adequately protect our proprietary rights may prevent us from retaining our competitive advantage and negatively affect our future operating results.

Our success and ability to compete are dependent, in part, upon our proprietary technology. Taken as a whole, we believe our intellectual property rights are significant and any failure to adequately protect the unauthorized use of our proprietary rights could result in our competitors offering similar products, potentially resulting in loss of a competitive advantage and decreased revenue. We rely upon a combination of patents, trademark law, trade secret protections, copyright law and confidentiality agreements with consultants and third parties to protect our proprietary rights. In addition, we generally require each of our employees to execute a proprietary information agreement designed to protect our trade secrets, our inventions created in the course of employment with us and other proprietary information of our company. Notwithstanding our efforts, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary rights. Moreover, effective patent, trademark, copyright or trade secret protections may not be available in every country in which we operate or intend to operate to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Also, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy or reverse engineer aspects of our products, develop similar technology independently or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Furthermore, detecting unauthorized use of our proprietary rights is difficult. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our proprietary rights. Such litigation could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources and could have a material adverse effect on our future operating results.

Intellectual property claims against us can be costly and negatively affect our business.

In the telecommunications business, there is frequent litigation based on allegations of patent infringement. As the number of entrants in our market increases and the functionality of our products is enhanced and overlaps with the products of other companies, we may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others. As a result, from time-to-time, third parties may claim exclusive patent or other intellectual property rights to technologies that we use. Although we believe that we do not face material liability related to infringement of the intellectual property of others, any claims asserting that our products infringe or may infringe proprietary rights of third parties, if determined adversely to us, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. Any claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert the efforts of our engineering and management personnel, cause delays in product shipments or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon our operating results. In any legal action claiming patent infringement commenced against us, we cannot assure you that we would prevail given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in patent litigation. In the event a claim against us was successful, and we could not obtain a license on acceptable terms or license a substitute technology or redesign to avoid infringement, we may be unable to market our affected products. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Certain of our products depend upon the continued availability of licensed technology from third parties.

We currently license and will continue to license from third parties certain technology integral to certain of our products. For example, we have obtained licenses from third parties for software for certain of our voice and fax products. While we believe that much of this technology is available from multiple sources, any difficulties in acquiring third-party technology licenses, or integrating the related third-party technology into our products, could result in delays in product development or upgrades until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed and integrated.

We may require new licenses in the future as our business grows and technology evolves. We cannot assure you that these licenses will continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may enter into acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value or divert management attention.

We intend to pursue acquisitions of businesses, technologies and products that will complement our existing operations. We cannot assure you that any acquisition we make in the future will provide us with the benefits we anticipated in entering into the transaction. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including:

• difficulties in integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired companies;

• maintenance of acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies;

• potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of management;

• impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of any integration of new management or other personnel;

• inability to maintain relationships with customers of the acquired business;

• difficulties in incorporating acquired technology and rights into products and services;

• failure to achieve the expected benefits of the acquisition;

• unexpected expenses resulting from the acquisition;

• potential unknown liabilities associated with the acquired businesses; and

• unanticipated expenses related to acquired technology and its integration into existing technology.

In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, restructuring charges and large one-time write-offs, such as write-offs for acquired in-process research and development costs. Acquisitions may also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to impairment tests, which could result in future impairment charges. Furthermore, if we finance acquisitions by issuing convertible debt or equity securities, our existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease.

From time-to-time, we may enter into negotiations for acquisitions that are not ultimately consummated. Those negotiations could result in diversion of management time and significant out-of-pocket costs. If we fail to evaluate and execute acquisitions properly, we may not be able to achieve our anticipated level of growth and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Recent compliance initiatives will cause us to incur significant increased costs and will require substantial time of our management.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the Nasdaq National Market, have imposed various new requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these new compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations are increasing our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal controls for financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Our ongoing compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management efforts. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the Nasdaq, SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial resources and management resources.

If we are unable to attract or retain key personnel, we may be unable to operate our business successfully.

Our success depends in large part upon the continued contributions of our key management, sales, marketing and engineering personnel, many of whom perform important functions and would be difficult to replace. If we lose one or more members of our senior management team our business and operating results would be harmed. We do not have employment contracts with our key personnel. There has been significant competition in our industry for qualified personnel, and, at times, we have experienced difficulty in recruiting qualified personnel. We may not be able to attract and retain the necessary personnel to accomplish our business objectives, and we may experience constraints that will adversely affect our ability to satisfy customer demand in a timely fashion or to support our customers and operations. Our inability to hire qualified personnel on a timely basis, or to retain our key personnel, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We are subject to environmental and occupational health and safety regulations that can increase the costs of operations or limit our activities.

We are subject to environmental and occupational health and safety regulations relating to matters such as reductions in the use of harmful substances, comprehensive risk management in manufacturing activities and final products, the use of lead-free soldering, and the recycling of products and packaging materials. On February 13, 2003 the European Parliament and the Counsel of the European Union published directives on waste electrical and electronic equipment and on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. These directives will generally require electronics producers after August 2005 to bear the cost of collection, treatment, recovery and safe disposal of past and future products from end-users and to ensure after June 2006 that new electrical and electronic equipment does not contain specified hazardous substances. While the cost of these directives to us cannot be determined before regulations are adopted in individual member states of the European Union, it may be substantial and may divert resources, which could detract from our ability to develop new products. We may not be able to comply in all cases with applicable environmental and other regulations, and if we do not, we may incur remediation costs or we may not be able to offer our products for sale in certain countries, which could adversely affect our results.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our operating results could fluctuate significantly and cause our stock price to be volatile, which may cause the value of your investment to decline.

Our operating results could fluctuate in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. If our operating results do not meet the expectations of securities analysts, the trading price of our common stock could significantly decline. This may cause the value of your investment in our company to decline. In addition, the value of your investment could be affected by investor perception of our industry or our prospects generally, independent of our operating performance. Some of the factors that could affect our operating results or the market price of our common stock include:

• our ability to cope with difficult conditions in the economy in general, and the telecommunications market in particular;

• our ability to formulate and implement effective strategies to respond to changing market requirements and conditions;

• cancellation or rescheduling of orders for our products;

• our ability to collect accounts receivable from customers that have been adversely affected by the difficult economic conditions;

• our ability to develop, manufacture, market and support our products and product enhancements;

• the timing and number of orders for our products, which have historically been weighted more heavily toward the last month of each quarter and the second and fourth quarters of each year;

• quarterly fluctuations in our revenue, which typically is lower in the third quarter due to customer summer vacation schedules, particularly in Europe, and to a lesser extent in the first quarter of each year;

• our ability to hire, train and retain key management, sales, marketing and engineering personnel;

• announcements or technological innovations by our competitors or in competing technologies;

• our ability to obtain sufficient supplies of sole or limited source components for our products;

• a decrease in the average selling prices of our products;

• changes in costs of components that we include in our products;

• the mix of products that we sell; and

• any interruptions in the flow of our products through our resellers or our two-tiered distribution system.

Because of quarterly fluctuations, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful. Moreover, our operating results may not meet our announced guidance or expectations of equity research analysts or investors, in which case the price of our common stock could decrease significantly.

In addition, our expense levels are based, in significant part, on our expectations as to future revenue and are largely fixed in the short term. As a result, we may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in revenue. Furthermore, we intend to increase our operating expenses as we expand our product development, sales and marketing, and administrative organizations. The timing of these increases and the rate at which new personnel become productive will affect our operating results, and, in particular, we may incur operating losses in the event of an unexpected delay in the rate at which development or sales personnel become productive. Any such revenue shortfall, and the resulting decrease in operating income or increase in operating loss, could lead to volatility in the price of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could lead to losses for individual investors.

Stock markets in general, and the market for technology stocks, including our common stock, in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated, or disproportionate, to the operating performance of those companies. The market for our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. Many factors could cause the trading price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially, including the following:

• future announcements concerning our business, technology, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, management, customers or competitors;

• introduction of new products or changes in product pricing policies by us, our competitors or our customers;

• changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or announcements of results of operations that are not aligned with the expectations of analysts and investors;

• changes in market valuations of similar companies;

• reduced spending for telecommunications hardware and software;

• the economic and competitive conditions in the telecommunications sectors in which our customers operate; and

• general economic conditions and stock market trends.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Many technology companies have been subject to this type of litigation. This type of litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Our corporate documents may prevent a change in control or management that stockholders consider desirable.

Our charter and by-laws contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a takeover of our company. In addition, we have implemented a shareholder rights plan. These provisions and our shareholder rights plan could have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of Brooktrout or a change in our management that stockholders consider favorable or beneficial. They could discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. They also could limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

We may need additional financing in the future, and any additional financing may result in restrictions on our operations or substantial dilution to our stockholders.

We may need to raise additional funds in the future, for example, to develop new technologies, support our expansion, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or respond to unanticipated situations. We may decide to raise additional funds through public or private financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements. Our ability to obtain debt or equity funding will depend on a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance and investor interest. Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to revise our business plan to reduce expenditures, including curtailing our growth strategies, foregoing acquisitions or reducing our product development efforts. If we succeed in raising additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible securities, the issuance could result in substantial dilution to existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities or preferred stock, these new securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. The terms of these securities, as well as any borrowings under our bank line of credit agreement, could impose restrictions on our operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may affect us due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure results primarily from fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risks

We invest cash balances in excess of operating requirements in short-term securities, generally with maturities of 90 days or less on the date of purchase. These securities consist of U.S. government notes and bonds, commercial paper, and certificates of deposit. We also invest in marketable debt securities that consist of notes and bonds issued by various federal agencies of the United States, as well as corporate commercial paper, with maturities greater than 90 days on the date of purchase. If we were to experience a 1% increase in the effective interest rate, the effect on the carrying value of marketable debt securities as of June 30, 2005 would be a decrease of approximately $0.2 million. Changes in interest rates and the related impact on the carrying value of marketable debt securities do not generally affect our net income or loss because our securities are considered available-for-sale for accounting purposes and any unrealized gain or loss is deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risks

We generally conduct business in U.S. dollars; however, some of our international sales are denominated in foreign currencies. We also operate sales and support offices located outside of the United States and we incur expenses that are denominated in foreign currencies. As a result of these activities, we are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates can be positive or negative in any period. We manage our exposure to foreign currency market risks through regular operating and financing activities. We also make use of foreign currency forward exchange contracts to minimize the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts for trading purposes. As of June 30, 2005, a 10% appreciation or depreciation in foreign currency exchange rates from the prevailing market rates would not have had a material impact on our results for the three or six months ended June 30, 2005.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2005. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our management necessarily applied its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to our company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Our repurchases of equity securities for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 were as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)	Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

April 1 – April 30, 2005	—	—	—	506,370
May 1 – May 31, 2005	—	—	—	506,370
June 1 – June 30, 2005	—	—	—	506,370

Total	—	—	—	506,370

(1) - In October 2004, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock from time-to-time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The program expires in October 2005. From the inception of this program in October 2004 through the date of this report, the Company has repurchased 493,630 shares for approximately $5.2 million.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

We held our 2005 annual meeting of stockholders on May 5, 2005. At the annual meeting, our stockholders were asked to consider proposals to:

• Elect two class I directors to serve for three-year terms;

• approve an amendment to our 2001 stock option and incentive plan increasing the number of shares of common stock issuable under such plan by 400,000 shares, from 1,500,000 shares to 1,900,000 shares;

• ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2005 fiscal year; and

• transact any other business properly presented at the meeting.

With regard to the election of two class I directors, David L. Chapman and David W. Duehren were nominated to serve until the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. Our other directors whose terms of office continued after the annual meeting are as follows: W. Brook Tunstall (class II director), Robert G. Barrett (class III director) and Eric R. Giler (class III director).

At the annual meeting, David L. Chapman was elected as a class I director by a vote of 11,180,352 shares of common stock in favor of Mr. Chapman, which was a plurality of the eligible votes, and 710,881 withheld for Mr. Chapman. David W. Duehren was elected as a class I director by a vote of 11,031,329 shares of common stock in favor of Mr. Duehren, which was a plurality of the eligible votes, and 859,904 withheld for Mr. Duehren.

In addition, at the annual meeting, the amendment to our 2001 stock option and incentive plan to increase the number of shares of common stock issuable under such plan by 400,000 shares, from 1,500,000 shares to 1,900,000 shares, was approved by a vote of 4,468,035 shares of common stock in favor, 3,599,377 against, 26,576 abstaining, and 3,797,245 broker non-votes.

The selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2005 fiscal year was ratified at the annual meeting by a vote of 11,798,741 shares of common stock in favor, 72,629 against, and 19,863 abstaining.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Exhibit

10.1		Brooktrout, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on March 30, 2005 (File No. 000-20698).

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		BROOKTROUT, INC.

Date:	August 9, 2005	By:	/s/ ERIC R. GILER
			Eric R. Giler
			President
			(Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	August 9, 2005	By:	/s/ ROBERT C. LEAHY
			Robert C. Leahy
			Vice President of Finance and Operations
			(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Exhibit

10.1		Brooktrout, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended by Amendment No.1 thereto, is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on March 30, 2005 (File No. 000-20698).

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed herewith.

BROOKTROUT INC 10-Q