SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10 - Q

(Mark One)

ý		Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
		For the quarterly period ended: SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
		For the quarterly period ended: SEPTEMBER 24, 2004
o		Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
		For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-8101
Commission File Number: 1-08101

SMTEK INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Exact Name of Registrant as as Specified in Its Charter:

DELAWARE	33-0213512	~~33-0213512~~
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization:	I.R.S. Employer Identification No.	~~I.R.S. Employer Identification No.~~
Address of Principal Executive Offices:		200 Science Drive
		Moorpark, CA 93021
Registrant’s Telephone Number:		(805) 532-2800

200 Science Drive, Moorpark, CA 93021

(805) 532-2800

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including

area code, of registrant’s principal. Executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes o No ý

The registrant had 2,~~284~~700,~~343~~ 745 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 28 22, ~~2003~~2004.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SMTEK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands except share amounts)

	September 30, 2003			June 30, 2003
	September 30, 2004			June 30, 2004
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~846~~522		$	~~583~~406
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $660 and $657, as of September 30, 2003 and June 30, 2003, respectively	12,403			11,096
Marketable securities	253			210
Inventories, net	10,190			9,377
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $407 and $406, as of September 30, 2004 and June 30, 2004, respectively	18,148			13,734
Prepaid expenses	1,004			446
Inventories	14,496			12,971
Total current assets	24,443			21,502
Prepaid expenses	734			608
Property, equipment and improvements, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization	5,205			5,541
Total current assets	34,153			27,929
Other assets	763			763
Property, equipment and improvements, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization	6,014			6,103
	$	30,411		$	27,806
Other assets, net	442			471
	$	40,609		$	34,503
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	1,~~697~~486		$	21,~~495~~371
Accounts payable	1016,~~948~~113			913,~~598~~536
Other accrued liabilities	32,~~717~~869			32,~~708~~943
Total current liabilities	1620,~~362~~468			1517,~~801~~850
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term bank lines of credit payable	6,681			5,452
Long-term bank line of credit payable	10,569			8,648
Long-term debt	4,651			5,675
Long-term debt and other	3,288			3,264
Total liabilities	2734,~~694~~325			2629,~~928~~762
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 250,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2003	475			—
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 250,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2004	—			475
Common stock, $.01 par value; 3,750,000 shares authorized; 2,284,343 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2003 and June 30, 2003	23			23
Common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 2,695,995 and 2,386,016 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2004 and June 30, 2004, respectively	27			24
Additional paid-in capital	3738,~~028~~164			37,~~028~~465
Accumulated deficit	(3431,~~918~~942		)	(3633,~~232~~279		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	~~109~~35			5956
Total stockholders’ equity	26,~~717~~284			~~878~~4,741
	$	3040,~~411~~609		$	2734,~~806~~503

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

SMTEK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~ ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)~~SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)

(In thousands except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Revenues	$	2029,~~692~~855		$	1720,~~587~~692
Cost of goods sold	1826,~~007~~192			1618,~~050~~007
Gross profit	23,~~685~~663			12,~~537~~685
Operating expenses:
Administrative and selling	2,~~027~~009			12,~~931~~027
Total operating expenses	2,~~027~~009			12,~~931~~027
Operating income (loss)	658			(394		)
Operating income	1,654			658
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest expense, net	(~~215~~213		)	(~~254~~215		)
Other income, net	~~908~~25			4908
Total non-operating income (expense), net	693			(250		)
Total non-operating (expense) income, net	(188		)	693
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	1,351			(644		)
Income before income taxes	1,466			1,351
Income tax provision	37129			537
Income (loss) from continuing operations	1,314			(649		)
Net income	$	1,337		$	1,314
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	—			(134		)
Net income per share - basic	$	0.50		$	0.58
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	1,314			(783		)
Net income per share - diluted	$	0.45		$	0.56
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	—			(420		)
Shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share:
Net income (loss)	$	1,314		$	(1,203	)
Basic	2,671			2,284
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Diluted	3,001			2,362
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.58		$	(0.29	)
Loss from discontinued operations	—			(0.06		)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	—			(0.18		)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.58		$	(0.53	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.56		$	(0.29	)
Loss from discontinued operations	—			(0.06		)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	—			(0.18		)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.56		$	(0.53	)
Shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	2,284			2,284
Diluted	2,362			2,284

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

SMTEK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1,314		$	(649	)
Income from continuing operations	$	1,337		$	1,314
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	~~454~~480			~~518~~454
Gain on extinguishment of debt	(817		)	—
Unrealized gain on marketable securities	(43		)	—
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable	(1,307		)	209
Expense of warrants issued for professional services	48			—
(Increase) decrease in inventories	(813		)	786
Gain on retirement of debt	—			(817		)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	1,350			(43		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities	(16		)	(317		)
Accounts receivable	(4,414		)	(1,307		)
Increase in prepaid expense	(424		)	(70		)
Inventories	(1,524		)	(813		)
Cash used in operating activities - discontinued operations	—			(185		)
Accounts payable	2,577			1,350
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(259		)	249
Accrued liabilities	(38		)	(16		)
Prepaid expense	(89		)	(424		)
Net cash used in operating activities	(1,666		)	(259		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(~~118~~391		)	(~~543~~118		)
Capital expenditures - discontinued operations	—			(168		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(391		)	(118		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(118		)	(711		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from bank lines of credit	1,~~229~~921			~~418~~1,229
Payments of short-term debt	(398		)	—
Proceeds from equipment line of credit	407			—
Payments of long-term debt	(607		)	(338		)
Repayments of short-term debt	—			(398		)
Proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock	500			—
Repayments of long-term debt	(268		)	(607		)
Costs related to new credit facility	(134		)	—
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options	135			—
Cash inflows from financing activities - discontinued operations	—			343
Proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock	—			500
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	590			423
Costs related to new credit facility	—			(134		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	50			(30		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	2,195			590
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	263			(69		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(22		)	50
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	583			816
Increase in cash and cash equivalents	116			263
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	846		$	747
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	406			583
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	522		$	846
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	~~136~~202		$	~~298~~136

250,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and accrued dividends of $36,000 were converted into an aggregate of 268,369 shares of common stock.

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

SMTEK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES ~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002~~

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

SMTEK International, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is an electronics manufacturing services (“EMS”) provider to serving original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) ~~primarily~~ in the medical, industrial ~~controls and~~ instrumentation, telecommunications, security, financial services automation and aerospace and defense industries. We ~~provide~~ provide integrated solutions to OEMs across the entire product life cycle, from ~~design~~ design to manufacturing to end-of-life services, for the worldwide ~~low-to-medium~~high ~~volume~~criticality, high reliability, high complexity segment of the EMS industry.

We have ~~five wholly~~four wholly-owned subsidiaries: SMTEK, Inc. (dba SMTEK Moorpark), located in Moorpark, California; ~~Jolt Technology, Inc. (aka~~ SMTEK ~~Fort Lauderdale), located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida; SMTEK~~ New England, located in Marlborough, Massachusetts; SMTEK Santa Clara, located in Santa Clara, California; and SMTEK International Thailand Limited, located in Ayutthya, Thailand.

On ~~November~~January 199, ~~2002~~2004, we ~~announced~~ ~~that~~sold weour ~~were~~subsidiary ~~consolidating~~Jolt Technology, ~~our~~Inc. ~~San~~(aka ~~Diego~~SMTEK ~~facility~~Fort ~~into~~Lauderdale), ~~our~~located ~~other~~in Fort Lauderdale, ~~California~~Florida, ~~operations~~for approximately $940,000 in ~~Moorpark~~cash to the president of Jolt and ~~Santa~~an affiliated ~~Clara~~investor of the Company. ~~This~~The loss ~~transition~~on the sale of Jolt was ~~completed~~approximately $85,000 and was recognized in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as a non-operating expense. The results of ~~March~~operations 31of Jolt are included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 ended September 30, 2003. For further discussion, see Note 2.

On April 9, 2003, we sold our facility in Northern Ireland. This is shown in our unaudited condensed financial statements as a discontinued operation. For further discussion, see Note 3.

The unaudited consolidated financial information furnished herein has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management, are necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods presented.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, ~~2003~~ 2004 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, ~~2004~~2005.

~~Certain~~As ~~notes~~permitted under applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain notes and other information are condensed or omitted from the interim financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Therefore, these condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with our ~~2003~~2004 Annual Report on Form 10-—K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 252, 2004 and the amendment ~~2003~~thereto on form 10-K/A as filed on October 22,2004.

Marketable Securities

Our marketable securities consist of an investment in common stock of a public company which, for accounting purposes, is classified as trading securities. Accordingly, the investment is marked to market quarterly with the change in value being recorded in the statement of operations. For the three months ended September 30, 2004, we recognized an unrealized gain on

marketable securities of approximately $43,000 that was recorded as non-operating income in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Management’s intention is to sell off the shares of such public company as the market allows. At September 24, 2004, the last business day of our first quarter of fiscal 2005, we held 168,500 shares with a fair market value of $1.50 per share.

Restructuring Costs

In connection with the closure and transition of the Company’s San Diego facility in the second quarter of 2003, we incurred approximately $1.6 million in expenses consisting of severance costs of $287,000, write-off of leasehold improvements of $370,000 and accrual of remaining lease obligation of $4,011,000 less sublease income of $3,038,000. All severance costs were paid out and, of the $973,000 lease-related commitments, $473,000 has been paid out, resulting in a reserve at September 30, 2004 of $500,000 of which $150,000 is recorded in accrued liabilities and $350,000 is recorded in long-term debt.

Revenue Recognition

All of our subsidiaries recognize revenues once all of the following conditions have been met: a) an authorized purchase order has been received in writing, b) the customer’s credit worthiness has been established, c) shipment of the product has occurred, d) title and risk of ownership has transferred, e) if stipulated by the contract, customer acceptance has occurred and f) all significant vendor obligations, if any, have been satisfied. We ship products FOB shipping point and, accordingly, title and risk of ownership pass to the customer upon shipment.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SMTEK International, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Stock Based Compensation

SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for stock-based awards as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations, compensation expense would generally be recorded for fixed option grants only if, on the date of grant, the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. We have elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for our employee stock option plans and award of options to non-employee directors. Had compensation expense for stock-based awards been determined consistent with SFAS No.123, our results of operation would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2003			2002
Net income (loss) as reported	$	1,314		$	(1,203	)
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value-based method for all awards, net of tax	(65		)	(88		)
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	1,249		$	(1,291	)
Pro forma earnings (loss) per share - basic	$	0.55		$	(0.57	)
Pro forma earnings (loss) per share - diluted	$	0.53		$	(0.57	)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” This standard requires that certain financial instruments embodying an obligation to transfer assets or to issue equity securities be classified as liabilities. This standard is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - an Interpretation of ARB No. 51”. The Interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The provisions of the Interpretation are effective for all enterprises with variable interests in variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and is effective October 9, 2003. The adoption of this Interpretation is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004			2003

Net income as reported	$	1,337		$	1,314
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value-based method for all awards, net of tax	(46		)	(65		)
Pro forma net income	$	1,291		$	1,249

Pro forma earnings per share - basic	$	0.48		$	0.55
Pro forma earnings per share - diluted	$	0.43		$	0.53

Accounting Period

We utilize a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to June 30, which for fiscal year ~~2003~~2004 fell on June 2725, ~~2003.~~ 2004. In the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the ~~2003~~ 2004 fiscal year end is shown as June 30 and the interim period end for both years is shown as September 30 for clarity of presentation. The actual interim periods ended on September 2624, ~~2003~~2004 and September 2726, ~~2002~~2003.

NOTE 2 - ~~CHANGE~~SALE INOF ~~ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE~~SUBSIDIARY

WeOn ~~adopted Statement~~January of9, ~~Financial~~2004, ~~Accounting~~we ~~Standards~~sold ~~(“SFAS”)~~our ~~No.~~subsidiary ~~142, “Goodwill and~~Jolt ~~Other Intangible Assets~~Technology,” ~~as of July 1, 2002~~Inc. ~~SFAS~~ ~~No.~~(aka ~~142~~SMTEK ~~requires~~Fort ~~that~~Lauderdale), ~~goodwill~~located ~~and~~in ~~intangible~~Fort ~~assets with~~Lauderdale, ~~indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized~~Florida, ~~but instead tested~~ for ~~impairment,~~ atapproximately ~~least annually~~$940,000 in ~~accordance~~cash ~~with~~to the ~~provisions~~president of ~~SFAS~~Jolt ~~No. 142. SFAS~~and ~~No. 142 also requires that~~an ~~intangible~~affiliated ~~assets~~investor ~~with~~of ~~definite~~the ~~useful lives be amortized over their respective~~Company. The ~~estimated~~loss ~~useful~~on ~~lives~~the tosale ~~their~~of ~~estimated~~Jolt ~~residual~~was ~~values~~approximately $85,000 and ~~reviewed~~was ~~for impairment~~recognized in ~~accordance~~the second ~~with~~quarter ~~SFAS~~of ~~No.~~fiscal ~~144,~~2004 ~~“Accounting~~ended ~~for~~December ~~the~~31, ~~Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets~~2003.” ~~In accordance~~Jolt’s ~~with SFAS No. 142~~revenues, ~~during~~cost ~~the~~of ~~December~~goods ~~2002~~sold ~~quarter we completed our~~and ~~initial~~operating ~~assessment~~income of ~~impairment~~$839,000, ~~and~~$619,000 ~~determined that our goodwill was fully impaired~~ and ~~have recognized an impairment loss of~~ $~~420~~62,000, ~~net of taxes~~respectively, in and the results ~~condensed consolidated statement~~ of operations asof aJolt ~~change~~for inthe ~~accounting principle,~~three ~~effective~~months ~~July~~ended 1September 30, ~~2002. The~~2003 ~~effect~~were ofincluded ~~the change~~ in ~~accounting principle to~~ the ~~quarter~~accompanying ~~ended~~unaudited ~~September~~Condensed ~~30,~~Consolidated Statements ~~2002~~of isOperations asand ~~follows~~Other ~~(dollars~~Comprehensive inIncome ~~thousands except per share amounts~~(Loss):.

	Three months ended September 30, 2002
Net loss from continuing operations, as originally reported	$	(649	)
Loss from discontinued operations	(134		)
Change in accounting principle, net of taxes	(420		)
Net loss as restated	$	(1,203	)
Basic and diluted loss per share:
Net loss from continuing operations, as originally reported	$	(0.29	)
Loss from discontinued operations	(0.06		)
Change in accounting principle	(0.18		)
Net loss as restated	$	(0.53	)

Net assets of Jolt as of the sale date of January 9, 2004 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Current assets	$	1,026
Property, equipment and improvements	58
Other assets	20
Current liabilities	(79		)
Net assets	$	1,025

There were no results of operations for Jolt in the current quarter ended September 30, 2004.

NOTE 3 - ~~DISCONTINUED~~EARNINGS ~~OPERATIONS~~PER SHARE

OnBasic ~~April~~earnings 9,per share is computed by dividing net ~~2003,~~income weavailable ~~sold~~to ~~100%~~common ofstockholders by the ~~outstanding~~weighted ~~stock~~average number of common ~~our~~shares ~~Northern~~outstanding ~~Ireland~~during ~~facility, SMTEK~~the ~~Europe~~period. ~~The~~ Diluted ~~purchaser~~earnings ~~also~~per share reflects the potential dilution that could ~~assumed~~occur ~~all~~if ~~liabilities~~convertible ofsecurities ~~SMTEK~~or ~~Europe.~~ other contracts to issue common stock were ~~The~~exercised ~~purchaser~~or ~~was~~converted ainto ~~Northern~~common ~~Ireland~~stock ~~investor~~or ~~group,~~resulted ~~which~~in ~~included~~the aissuance of common ~~director~~stock ~~from~~that ~~SMTEK~~then ~~Europe~~shared in our earnings.

~~Accordingly~~Common stock equivalents used in the determination of diluted earnings per share include the effect, ~~operating~~when such effect is dilutive, of ~~results~~our ~~for~~outstanding ~~SMTEK~~employee ~~Europe~~stock ~~for~~options, the ~~three~~8-1/2% ~~months~~Convertible ~~ended~~Subordinated Debentures ~~September~~(which 30are convertible into 4,988 ~~2002~~shares ~~have~~of common stock at $212.50 ~~been~~per ~~presented~~share inof ~~the~~common ~~accompanying~~stock), warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at $7.95 per share (see Note 8 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and, for September 30, 2003 only, the Series A Preferred Stock (which is convertible into 250,000 shares of ~~Operations~~common ~~and~~stock ~~Other~~at ~~Comprehensive~~$2.00 ~~Income~~per share ~~(Loss~~of common stock, see Note 7 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The asfollowing is a ~~discontinued operation,~~summary of the calculation of basic and ~~are~~diluted ~~summarized~~earnings asper ~~follows~~share (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2002
	Three Months Ended September 30,
Net sales	$	3,149
	2004			2003
Cost of goods sold	(2,989		)
Net income	$	1,337		$	1,314
Operating expenses	(191		)
Weighted average shares:
Other income (expense), net	(103		)
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding	2,671,037			2,284,343
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(134	)
Dilutive effect of outstanding common stock equivalents	329,999			77,254
Diluted weighed average number of common shares outstanding	3,001,036			2,361,597
Earnings per share - basic	$	0.50		$	0.58
Earnings per share - diluted	$	0.45		$	0.56

~~Net~~Options ~~assets~~to purchase approximately 13,092 shares of ~~SMTEK~~common ~~Europe~~stock at prices ranging from $9.75 to ~~consisted~~$10.00 which were outstanding at September 30, 2004, are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the ~~following~~three (months ended September 30, 2004, because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of our common stock and the effect would be antidilutive. Options to purchase approximately 325,992 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $1.50 to $10.00 which were outstanding at September 30, 2003, are not included in ~~thousands):~~the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2003, because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of our common stock and the effect would be antidilutive.

	As of September 30, 2002
Current assets	$	6,531
Property, equipment and improvements	1,643
Current liabilities	(6,720		)
Long-term debt	(760		)
Net assets	$	694

NOTE 4 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in our earnings (losses).

Common stock equivalents used in the determination of diluted earnings per share include the effect, when such effect is dilutive, of our outstanding employee stock options, the 8-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures (which are convertible into 4,988 shares of common stock at $212.50 per share of common stock) and the Series A Preferred Stock (which is convertible into 250,000 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share of common stock). The following is a summary of the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2003		2002
Net income (loss)	$	1,314	$	(1,203	)
Weighted average shares:
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding	2,284,343		2,284,343
Dilutive effect of outstanding common stock equivalents	77,254		—
Diluted weighed average number of common shares outstanding	2,361,597		2,284,343
Earnings (loss) per share - basic	$	0.58	$	(0.53	)
Earnings (loss) per share - diluted	$	0.56	$	(0.53	)

~~Options~~NOTE to4 ~~purchase approximately~~- 325,992 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $1.50 to $10.00 which were outstanding at September 30, 2003, are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2003, because the exercise price of these options were greater than the average market price of our common stock. Options to purchase approximately 22,100 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $1.21 to $10.00 which were outstanding at September 30, 2002, would not have been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2002, because the exercise price of these options and warrants were greater than the average market price of our common stock.INVENTORIES

Convertible subordinated debentures aggregating $1,060,000, due in 2008 and convertible at a price of $212.50 per share at any time prior to maturity were outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2003 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the conversion price was greater than the average market price of the common stock. Convertible subordinated debentures aggregating $1,580,000, due in 2008 and convertible at a price of $212.50 per share at any time prior to maturity were outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2002 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive.

The shares of the Series A Preferred Stock which are initially convertible into 250,000 shares of common stock at a price of $2.00 per share and outstanding at September 30, 2003 are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2003 because the conversion price was greater than the average market price of our common stock.

NOTE 5 - INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30, 2004		June 30, 2004
Raw materials	$	8,235	$	7,209
Work in process	5,832		5,285
Finished goods	429		477
Total inventories	$	14,496	$	12,971

	September 30, 2003		June 30, 2003
Raw materials	$	6,232	$	5,810
Work in process	3,512		3,298
Finished goods	446		269
Total inventories	$	10,190	$	9,377

Note 5 - PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS

Note 6 - PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS

Property, equipment and improvements consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30, 2003			June 30, 2003
	September 30, 2004			June 30, 2004
Buildings and improvements	$	1,450		$	1,450
Land	$	491		$	498
Plant equipment	13,157			13,075
Buildings and improvements	1,965			1,835
Office and other equipment	1,616			1,581
Plant equipment	13,480			13,265
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(11,018		)	(10,565		)
Office and other equipment	1,757			1,704
Total property, equipment and improvements	$	5,205		$	5,541
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(11,679		)	(11,199		)
Total property, equipment and improvements	$	6,014		$	6,103

NOTE 76 - ~~CREDIT~~FINANCING ~~AGREEMENTS AND DEBT RESTRUCTURING~~ARRANGEMENTS

InAt September ~~2003~~ 30, we2004, ~~entered~~as ~~into~~one acomponent ~~new~~of ~~credit~~our credit facility, ~~which~~we ~~consists~~have of a $1015 million working capital line, acollateralized ~~term~~by ~~credit~~accounts receivable, ~~facility~~inventory inand ~~the~~equipment ~~amount~~for ofour updomestic tooperating ~~$1.0~~units that ~~million~~matures ~~and~~September a30, ~~capital expenditure facility of $1 million~~2007. ~~The~~Borrowings under ~~$10~~the ~~million~~ working capital line ~~is collateralized~~bear ~~by accounts receivable~~interest, ~~inventory~~at ~~and~~our ~~equipment. Borrowings~~option, ~~under the credit agreement bear interest~~ at either the bank’s prime rate (4.075% at September 30, ~~2003~~2004) plus 1.0.75% or a Libor-base rate (1.1284% at September 30, ~~2003~~2004) plus 3.7550%. ~~The~~At September ~~credit~~30, ~~facility~~2004, ~~contains~~borrowings ~~certain~~under our working capital line amounted to $10.6 ~~financial~~million, ~~covenants~~the effective interest rate was 5.5% and ~~matures~~our ~~September~~borrowing ~~19,~~capacity ~~2006~~was approximately $4.4 million. ~~Accordingly,~~Borrowings under ~~amounts~~our ~~outstanding~~working capital line at September 30, ~~2003~~2004 ~~under our credit facility~~ have been classified as long-term. In addition, in September 2003 we borrowed $1 million on our term credit facility, the second component of our credit facility. This advance has a maturity date of September 19, 2006 and bears interest, at our option, at either the bank’s prime rate (4.075% at September 30, ~~2003~~2004) plus 1.0.75% or a Libor-base rate (1.1284% at September 30, ~~2003~~ 2004) plus 3.7550%. At September 30, ~~2003~~ 2004, the balance outstanding was $1667,000 ~~million~~ and the effective interest rate was 5.05%. The third component of our credit facility, the capital expenditure credit facility of $12.5 million, ~~will~~is bebeing used to finance our capital expenditures. Each advance under the capital expenditure credit facility will have a three year term at either the Bank’s prime rate ~~or at a fixed rate equal to the Libor rate~~ plus 30.75%~~. We~~ ~~were~~or, inat ~~compliance~~our ~~with~~option, ~~all covenants~~ at ~~September~~ ~~30,~~a ~~2003.~~fixed rate

Also during the three months ended September 30, 2003, we settled obligations to former officers, employees and directors under consulting and deferred fee agreements by paying an aggregate of $430,000 to fully retire an aggregate of $889,000 in debt resulting in an aggregate $459,000 recognition of gain from extinguishment of debt. We also reached settlement with certain sub-debt holders by paying an aggregate of $172,000 to fully retire an aggregate of $520,000 in debt resulting in an aggregate $348,000 gain from extinguishment of debt. The approximately $800,000 gain on extinguishment of debt is a component of Other income, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.9

equal to the Libor-base rate plus 3.50%. Borrowings under the capital expenditure credit facility were $547,000 as of September 30, 2004 and the effective interest rate was 4.75%. Our bank covenants include requirements related to net income, stockholders’ equity and debt service ratio. We were in compliance with all covenants on the above credit facilities at September 30, 2004.

On May 6, 2004, we finalized a Credit Facility Agreement between SMTEK International Thailand Limited (our Thailand subsidiary) and BankThai Public Company Limited and an unconditional guarantee by SMTEK International, Inc. for the purpose of funding the growth and expansion of our Thailand facility. The credit facility includes a $678,000 mortgage loan for the purchase of the building and land at our Thailand facility. The mortgage has a seven year term with an initial interest rate of 5.75%, based on Thailand Prime Rate (5.75% at September 30, 2004) and a monthly payment of approximately $9,000. The Credit Facility Agreement also includes a $440,000 construction loan for the expansion of the Thailand facility. The construction loan has a 78 month term with interest at Thailand Prime Rate and will have a monthly payment of approximately $5,000 starting after the completion of construction which is presently scheduled for November 2004. The Credit Facility Agreement also includes a working capital line of approximately $500,000 with interest at Thailand Prime Rate, a one year term and it is secured by all the assets of the Thailand facility. All liabilities and obligations under the Credit Facility are denominated in Baht, the currency of Thailand. As of September 30, 2004, we have a mortgage note of $678,000 for the purchase of the land and building and have accrued $185,000 for construction in progress on the new building.

NOTE 7 - PREFERRED STOCK

In September 2003, we sold in a private placement 250,000 shares of convertible Series A Preferred Stock at $2.00 per share for gross offering proceeds of $500,000. The shares were convertible into common stock initially on a one-to-one basis and are redeemable, solely at the Company’s option, at 1.5 times the purchase price after 180 days from the date of issuance. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock have voting rights equal to holders of common stock on an as converted basis and enjoy a liquidation preference to any junior stock whereby preferred holders receive 1.5 times their initial investment plus any accrued dividends before any distributions to junior stockholders. Preferred holders are entitled to receive, on January 1 of each year, out of any assets legally available therefor, payable when, as and if declared by the Board, prior and in preference to any declaration or payment of any dividend on Junior Securities, dividends at the rate of 9% of the Purchase Price per annum plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. Such dividends accrue annually in arrears whether or not declared by the Board of Directors and shall be cumulative. If the Company declares and pays dividends or distributions on common stock then the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to share in such dividends or distributions on a pro rata basis as if their shares had been converted into shares of common stock. Dividends accrued on the preferred stock amounted to $36,000 at June 30, 2004.

In July 2004, the 250,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and accrued dividends of approximately $36,000 were converted into an aggregate of 268,369 shares of common stock.

NOTE 8 - ~~PREFERRED STOCK~~WARRANTS

InDuring ~~September~~fiscal ~~2003~~2004, we ~~sold~~issued inwarrants ~~a private~~to ~~placement 250~~purchase 15,000 shares of ~~non-redeemable, convertible Series A Preferred Stock for $500,000. The shares are convertible into~~ common stock ~~initially on a one-to-one basis and are redeemable, solely~~ at ~~the~~$7.95 ~~Company’s~~per ~~option,~~share atin ~~1.5~~exchange ~~times~~for ~~the purchase price~~professional ~~after~~services ~~180~~to ~~days~~be ~~from~~rendered ~~the~~over ~~date~~a of14-month ~~issuance~~period. ~~Holders~~The offair ~~Series~~value Aof ~~Preferred~~the ~~Stock~~warrants, ~~have~~which ~~voting~~amounted ~~rights~~to ~~equal~~$147,000 toat ~~holders~~September of30, ~~common~~2004, ~~stock~~is onrecorded an as ~~converted~~prepaid ~~basis~~expense and ~~enjoy~~amortized ato ~~liquidation~~expense ~~preference~~over tothe ~~any~~14-month ~~junior~~service ~~stock whereby preferred holders receive 1~~period.5 In ~~times~~the ~~their initial~~three ~~investment~~month ~~plus~~period ~~any~~ended ~~accrued~~September ~~dividends~~30, ~~before~~2004, ~~any~~$48,000 ~~distributions~~was charged to ~~junior~~administrative ~~stockholders~~and selling expense.

NOTE 9 - ~~BUSINESS SEGMENT AND~~ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

We operate in a single business segment - the EMS industry. Our revenues and long-lived assets, net of accumulated depreciation, by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2003		2002
	2004		2003
Revenues:
United States	$	1826,~~742~~325	$	1618,~~832~~742
Thailand	13,~~950~~530		~~755~~1,950
Total revenues	$	2029,~~692~~855	$	1720,~~587~~692

	September 30, 2003			June 30, 2003
	September 30, 2004				June 30, 2004
Long-lived assets:
United States	$	~~4,993~~	4,281	$	~~5,324~~$	4,448
Thailand	~~212~~1,733			~~217~~	1,655
Total long-lived assets	$	56,~~205~~014		$	~~5,541~~$	6,103

NOTE 10 - FOREIGN CURRENCY FORWARD CONTRACTS

It is our policy not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. We may, from time to time, enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts in an effort to protect us from adverse currency rate fluctuations on foreign currency commitments entered into in the ordinary course of business. These commitments are generally for terms of less than one year. The foreign currency forward exchange contracts are executed with banks believed to be creditworthy and are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” all derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is dependent upon whether or not a derivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge and, if so, the type of hedge. Changes in fair value are recognized in current results of operations for fair value hedges and in other comprehensive income for cash flow hedges. Derivative financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 are recognized as assets or liabilities with gains or losses recognized in current results of operations. At September 30, 2003 and 2002, we did not have any open forward foreign currency contracts.

NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Environmental Matters

Since the early 1990s, we continue to be involved in certain remediation and investigative studies regarding soil and groundwater contamination at the site of a former printed circuit board manufacturing plant in Anaheim, California. One of our former subsidiaries, Aeroscientific Corp., leased the Anaheim facility. Under the terms of a cost sharing agreement, the remaining remediation costs are currently being shared on a 50-50 basis with the landlord. There is no environmental insurance coverage for this remediation. At September 30, 2003, we had a reserve of $416,000 for future remediation costs. Management, based in part on consultations with outside environmental engineers and scientists, believes that this reserve is adequate to cover its share of future remediation costs at this site. However, the future actual remediation costs could differ significantly from the estimates. Further, our portion could potentially exceed the amount of our reserve. Our liability for remediation in excess of our reserve could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~THIS~~References ~~QUARTERLY~~in ~~REPORT~~this ~~ON FORM~~report ~~10-Q,~~to ~~INCLUDING~~“the ~~THE DISCLOSURES BELOW~~Company”, ~~CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. WHEN USED HEREIN, THE TERMS~~ “~~ANTICIPATES,~~SMTEK”, “~~EXPECTS,~~we”, “~~ESTIMATES,~~our” ~~“BELIEVES~~,” or “~~WILL~~us” ~~AND~~mean ~~SIMILAR~~SMTEK ~~EXPRESSIONS~~International, ASInc. ~~THEY~~together ~~RELATE~~with TOits USsubsidiaries, ORexcept ~~OUR~~where ~~MANAGEMENT,~~the ~~ARE~~context ~~INTENDED~~otherwise TOrequires. ~~IDENTIFY~~This ~~SUCH~~Quarterly ~~FORWARD~~Report on Form 10-~~LOOKING~~Q ~~STATEMENTS. FORWARD-LOOKING~~contains ~~STATEMENTS IN~~certain ~~THIS~~statements ~~REPORT~~that ORare, ~~HEREAFTER~~or ~~INCLUDED~~may INbe ~~OTHER~~deemed ~~PUBLICLY~~to ~~AVAILABLE~~be, ~~DOCUMENTS~~forward-looking ~~FILED~~statements ~~WITH~~within ~~THE~~the ~~SECURITIES~~meaning ~~AND~~of ~~EXCHANGE~~Section ~~COMMISSION~~27A ~~(“SEC”),~~of ~~REPORTS~~the TOSecurities ~~OUR STOCKHOLDERS~~Act ~~AND~~of ~~OTHER~~1933 ~~PUBLICLY~~and Section ~~AVAILABLE~~21E ~~STATEMENTS~~of ~~ISSUED~~the ORSecurities ~~RELEASED~~Exchange BYAct ~~US INVOLVE~~of ~~KNOWN~~1934, ~~AND~~and ~~UNKNOWN~~are ~~RISKS,~~made ~~UNCERTAINTIES~~in ~~AND~~reliance upon ~~OTHER~~the ~~FACTORS~~protections ~~WHICH~~provided ~~COULD CAUSE~~by ~~OUR~~such ~~ACTUAL~~acts ~~RESULTS,~~for ~~PERFORMANCE~~forward-looking ~~(FINANCIAL~~statements. These ORforward-looking ~~OPERATING)~~statements OR(such ~~ACHIEVEMENTS TO~~as ~~DIFFER~~when ~~FROM~~we ~~THE~~describe ~~FUTURE~~what ~~RESULTS~~“will,” ~~PERFORMANCE~~“may” or ~~(FINANCIAL~~“should” ORoccur, ~~OPERATING)~~what ~~OR ACHIEVEMENTS~~we ~~EXPRESSED~~“plan,” OR“intend,” ~~IMPLIED~~“estimate,” BY“believe,” ~~FORWARD-LOOKING~~“expect” ~~STATEMENTS. THESE~~or “anticipate” ~~RISKS~~will ~~INCLUDE~~occur, ~~BUT~~and ~~ARE~~other ~~NOT~~similar ~~LIMITED~~statements) TOinclude, ~~THE~~ ~~RISKS~~but ~~SET~~are ~~FORTH~~not ~~HEREIN~~limited to, ~~AND~~statements INregarding ~~OTHER~~future ~~DOCUMENTS~~sales ~~FILED~~and ~~WITH~~operating ~~THE SEC~~results, ~~EACH~~future OFprospects, ~~WHICH~~anticipated ~~COULD~~benefits ~~ADVERSELY~~of ~~AFFECT~~proposed ~~OUR~~(or ~~BUSINESS~~future) ~~AND~~acquisitions ~~THE~~and ~~ACCURACY~~new ~~OF THE~~facilities, ~~FORWARD-LOOKING~~growth, ~~STATEMENTS~~the ~~CONTAINED~~capabilities ~~HEREIN. FUTURE~~and ~~EXPECTED~~capacities ~~RESULTS~~of ~~ARE~~business ~~BASED~~operations, ~~UPON~~any ~~MANAGEMENT’S~~financial or ~~BEST~~other ~~ESTIMATES, CURRENT~~guidance ~~CONDITIONS~~and ~~AND~~all ~~THE~~statements ~~MOST~~that ~~RECENT~~are ~~RESULTS~~not OFbased ~~OPERATIONS. OUR~~on ~~ACTUAL~~historical ~~RESULTS~~fact, ~~PERFORMANCE OR~~but ~~ACHIEVEMENTS~~rather ~~MAY~~reflect ~~DIFFER~~our ~~MATERIALLY~~current ~~FROM~~expectations ~~THOSE~~concerning ~~EXPRESSED~~future ORresults ~~IMPLIED~~and BYevents. We ~~SUCH~~make ~~FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. WE~~certain DOassumptions ~~NOT~~when ~~UNDERTAKE~~making forward-looking statements, ~~AND~~any of ~~SPECIFICALLY~~which ~~DISCLAIM,~~could ~~ANY~~prove ~~OBLIGATION~~inaccurate, TOincluding, ~~UPDATE~~but ~~THESE~~not ~~FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.~~limited

~~THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT.~~11

~~UPDATE~~to, statements about our future operating results and business plans. OFThe ~~RISK~~ultimate ~~FACTORS~~correctness of these forward-looking statements is dependent upon a number of known and unknown risks and events, and is subject to various uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements.

The following ~~risk~~ important factors, ~~update~~among ~~certain~~others, ~~risk~~could affect ~~factors~~future ~~identified~~results and events, causing those results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our ~~2003~~forward-looking ~~Annual~~statements: business ~~Report~~conditions onand growth in our customers’ industries, the electronic ~~Form~~manufacturing ~~10-K~~services ~~which~~industry ~~was~~and ~~filed~~the ~~with~~general economy, variability of operating results, our dependence on a limited number of major customers, the potential ~~SEC~~consolidation of our customer base, availability of components, dependence on ~~September~~certain 25industries, ~~2003. Readers~~seasonality, ~~are~~variability ~~referred~~of customer requirements, our ability to ~~the~~successfully ~~documents~~negotiate ~~filed~~definitive agreements and byconsummate usacquisitions, ~~with~~and ~~the~~to ~~SEC~~integrate operations following consummation of acquisitions, ~~including~~our ability to take advantage of our ~~most~~restructuring ~~recent~~to ~~Reports~~improve utilization onand ~~Forms~~realize ~~10-K~~savings, ~~10-Q~~other economic, business and competitive ~~8-K~~factors affecting our customers, ~~each~~our asindustry itand business generally and other factors that we may benot ~~amended~~have ~~from~~currently ~~time~~identified toor ~~time,~~quantified. ~~for~~For a ~~more complete~~further list and description of ~~important~~various ~~risk~~risks, relevant factors and uncertainties that could cause future results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements, see “Factors that May Affect our Results” below, as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as amended, any subsequent Reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

12All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we do not intend to publicly update or correct any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that subsequently occur or of which we hereafter become aware. You should read this document and the documents, if any, that we incorporate by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We may not update these forward-looking statements, even if our situation changes in the future. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

~~General~~The ~~Industry~~following discussion ~~Conditions~~and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and ~~Competition~~related notes included elsewhere in this report.

~~The~~RISK ~~markets~~FACTORS ~~in which~~THAT ~~the~~MAY ~~EMS~~AFFECT ~~industry~~OUR ~~operates~~BUSINESS ~~are intensely competitive. Competition in the EMS industry is primarily~~AND ~~driven~~RESULTS byOF price with secondary factors including product quality, technical capability and the ability to deliver products on schedule. Both the price of, and the demand for, EMS are sensitive to economic conditions, changing technologies and other factors. The technology used in EMS is widely available, and there are a large number of domestic and foreign competitors. Many of these firms are larger than we are and have significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources.OPERATIONS

~~Many~~The offollowing ~~our~~factors ~~competitors~~update ~~have~~certain ~~also~~risk ~~made~~factors ~~substantial~~identified ~~capital expenditures~~ in ~~recent~~our ~~years~~2004 ~~and operate~~Annual ~~technologically~~Report ~~advanced~~on ~~EMS~~Form ~~facilities. Further, some of our customers have substantial in~~10-~~house EMS~~K ~~capabilities. There~~which iswas afiled ~~risk~~with ~~that,~~the ~~in periods~~SEC ~~when~~on ~~these~~September ~~customers~~2, ~~are~~2004. We ~~operating~~direct atreaders ~~less~~to ~~than~~the ~~full~~documents ~~capacity,~~we ~~they~~file ~~will~~with ~~use~~the ~~their~~SEC, ~~own~~including ~~facilities~~our ~~rather~~most ~~than~~recent ~~contract~~Reports ~~with~~on ~~us. Despite~~Forms ~~this risk~~10-K, we10-Q ~~believe~~and ~~we have not~~8-K, ~~recently~~each ~~experienced~~as ait ~~significant~~may ~~loss~~be ofamended ~~business~~from time to ~~OEMs’~~time, ~~captive~~for ~~assembly operations. However,~~a ~~there~~more ~~can~~complete bedescription noof ~~assurance~~important ~~that~~risk ~~future~~factors ~~losses~~affecting inour ~~this regard will not occur~~Company.

Another factor that presents a continuing risk is the inability of EMS providers to require that their customers take back excess inventories that have no current or known future use in production. (See the risk factor below dealing with “If Our Customers Vary Their Requirements, Our Results and Our Financial Condition May Be Affected”). This factor has also affected us and may occur more frequently if the current electronic industry production slowdown does not appreciably improve. We can provide no assurance that we will not be forced to sell excess inventory. Further, if we sell such excess inventory, we may have to sell all or portions of the inventory for a loss, which may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our Domestic Line of Credit Agreement Contains Certain Financial Covenants That Must Be Met.

In September 2003, we entered into a new credit facility (See Note 7 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a more detailed discussion of the new credit facility). This new credit facility matures September 19, 2006 and includes certain covenants that we are required to comply with. In the event of default under our line of credit agreement, any and all outstanding borrowings could become immediately due and payable which would likely create significant operating and financial restrictions on us, further causing an adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our Industry is Characterized by Low Profit Margins.

Competition in the EMS industry is primarily driven by price often resulting in lower profit margins for EMS providers. In this regard, customers have sought and continue to seek price reductions. ~~Unless~~In ~~we successfully achieve further material cost reductions~~addition, ~~efficiencies~~designing and manufacturing ~~productivity~~products ~~gains,~~for wenew ~~may~~customers ~~experience~~can aresult ~~material~~in ~~adverse~~higher ~~effect~~costs ~~on our operating results~~ and ~~our~~lower ~~financial~~profit ~~condition.~~ margins ~~There~~than ~~can~~we betypically noexperience ~~assurance,~~with ~~however,~~our ~~whether~~established ~~reductions~~customers insince ~~materials~~initial ~~costs~~production ~~will~~runs bedo ~~effective~~not orreflect ~~adequate~~full toproduction ~~compensate~~efficiencies. Unless ~~for~~we ~~such~~successfully ~~price~~achieve ~~reductions or~~further ~~that~~material wecost ~~will~~reductions, ~~be successful in furthering~~ efficiencies ~~and productivity gains.~~

1312

and productivity gains, we may experience a material adverse effect on our operating results and our financial condition. There can be no assurance, however, that reductions in material costs will be effective or adequate to compensate for such price reductions or that we will be successful in furthering efficiencies and productivity gains.

The Loss of Any One of Our Larger Customers May Adversely Affect Our Results and Financial Condition.

WeSales ~~had sales~~ to ~~three~~four customers ~~which~~were greater than 10% of total sales and accounted for 1614.81%, 13.8% 11.16% and 811.81% of revenues in the three ~~fiscal~~months ~~2003~~ended September 30, 2004. The loss of one or more of our larger customers, or a significant reduction in sales to any of our major customers, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our Operating Results Fluctuate and May Continue to Materially Fluctuate.

Our operating results fluctuate and may continue to materially fluctuate from period to period. Our operating results may vary significantly depending on a number of factors, several of which are beyond our control. These include:

• the timing of orders from and shipments to major customers,

• the availability and cost of materials and components,

• the volume of orders relative to our capacity,

• the timing of expenditures in anticipation of future sales,

• the gain or loss of significant customers,

• variations in the mix between consignment and turnkey arrangements with customers,

• variations in the demand for products in the industries we serve,

• quality issues and general economic conditions, and

• the development and introduction of new products and technologies by our customers and our customers’ competitors.

In addition to fluctuations from day to day operations, our operating results will also be affected by the following risks:

• excess capacity at the various subsidiary plants, which may entail attempts to limit liabilities of leases, selling or subleasing equipment, and other measures of that nature for which we might not be successful,

• our debt load, though recently decreased, could rise to a point that over-extends our cash-flow capacity, and

• our inability to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants in our domestic line of credit agreement. (See risk factor entitled “Our Domestic Line of Credit Agreement Contains Certain Financial Covenants That Must Be Met”).

A significant portion of our expenses are relatively fixed in nature and planned expenditures are based in part on anticipated orders. Our inability to timely adjust expenditures to compensate for a decline in net sales may magnify the adverse impact of a decline in our results of operations.

Our Stock Price Has Been And Continues To Be Volatile. Based Upon A Number of Factors, We May Face Delisting Proceedings From Nasdaq.

The market price for our common stock continues to be volatile due to various factors. These factors include, but are not limited to:

• the public float being relatively small and thinly traded;

• announcements by us or our competitors of new contracts or technological innovations;

• fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results;

• acquisition-related announcements; and

• general market conditions.

In addition, our stock price in recent years has experienced significant price fluctuations for a variety of reasons, including conditions that are both internal and external to us.

On June 27, 2003, we received notice from Nasdaq of its decision to continue listing our common stock on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market via an exception to a number of listing requirements. The terms of this temporary exception require that we satisfy a number of conditions for continued listing. On October 3, 2003, Nasdaq notified us that we had met the requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Nonetheless, Nasdaq notified us that its Listing Qualifications Panel would continue to monitor our compliance with Nasdaq’s shareholders’ equity requirement and, in this regard, we must file this quarterly report on Form 10-Q on or before November 14, 2003 reporting shareholders’ equity of at least $2,500,000.

Although we believe that we have currently satisfied Nasdaq’s conditions for continued listing on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, there can be no assurance that our common stock will continue to be currently listed on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market or, if it continues to be listed, that we will be able to maintain such listing in the future. If our common stock were delisted from The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, it may become eligible immediately thereafter for quotation on the Over-The-Counter Market on the NASD Electronic Bulletin Board or in the “pink sheets” maintained by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc., which are generally considered to be less efficient systems than markets such as Nasdaq or other national exchanges, and which may also cause difficulty in conducting trades and difficulty in obtaining future financing. Further, for companies whose securities are traded in the Over-The-Counter Market, it is more difficult: (i) to obtain accurate quotations, (ii) to obtain coverage for significant news events because major wire services, such as the Dow Jones News Service, generally do not publish press releases about such companies, and (iii) to obtain needed capital.

The Availability and Expense of Components and Materials May Affect Our Operations.

For our surface mount assemblies and turnkey operations, we purchase components and materials from approved suppliers. Any failure on the part of these suppliers to deliver required components to us or any failure of such components to meet performance requirements could impair our ability to meet scheduled shipment dates. This in turn could delay consummating sales and receipt of payment, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, we have experienced, and may in the future experience, shortages of certain types of electronic

components. These shortages may increase our costs and may also cause us to experience delays in deliveries to our customers.

In addition, our customers may specify that we purchase parts or materials from particular component manufacturers for use in the assembly process. Certain components used in a number of our customer programs are obtained from sole source suppliers. To the extent these components are not available on a timely basis or are in short supply because of allocations imposed by the component manufacturer, and the customer is unwilling to accept a substitute component, delays may occur. Such delays are experienced in the EMS business from time to time and have caused sales and inventory fluctuations in our business.

To the extent our customers do not absorb the costs associated with parts or materials shortages or price increases, whether by agreement or to maintain a business relationship with a customer, we could suffer a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If Our Customers’ Vary Their Requirements, Our Results And Our Financial Condition May Be Affected.

The level and timing of purchase orders placed by our customers are affected by a number of factors, including variation in demand for the customer’s products, customer attempts to manage inventory and changes in the customer’s manufacturing strategies. Many of these factors are outside of our control. Generally, customers may cancel, reduce or delay purchase orders and commitments without penalty, except for payment for services rendered, materials purchased or procured and, in certain circumstances, charges associated with such cancellation, reduction or delay. The current economic conditions, however, may adversely affect our ability to recover such costs, penalties and charges.

Significant or numerous cancellations, reductions or delays in orders by customers, or inability by customers to pay for services rendered or to pay for components and materials purchased on such customer’s behalf, have in the past adversely affected our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such events or conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future.

Our Liquidity is Currently Limited and Our Debt Profile May Change and May Affect Our Operations and Financial Condition.

Our ~~cash~~liquidity is currently limited, and, at September 30, ~~2003~~2004, our debt-to-equity ratio, excluding bank line of credit classified as long-term, was 20.376 to 1.00. Although our debt load recently decreased and we have ~~taken~~reduced ~~certain cost reduction measures~~costs, several factors, including but not limited to, a ~~continued~~ continued prolonged economic downturn, capital investment to increase production, acquisitions of other EMS companies or our inability to ~~move~~remain ~~the Company toward profitability~~profitable, may significantly change our debt profile, resulting in an increase in debt to a point that over-extends our cash-flow capacity. Also, under such circumstances, we may have future capital requirements and our ability to obtain additional financing will be subject to a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance and investor sentiment. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of additional financing unavailable or unattractive to us. Any of these events or conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

16Our Domestic Line of Credit Agreement and our Thailand Credit Facility Contain Certain Financial Covenants That Must Be Met And Failure To Do So Could Negatively Affect our Financial Condition.

Our domestic credit facility, which matures September 30, 2007, includes certain covenants that we are required to comply with. Our bank covenants include requirements related to our net income, stockholders’ equity and debt service ratio. On May 6, 2004, we entered into a new Thailand credit facility (See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Thailand Credit Facility”). In the event of default under these credit agreements, any and all outstanding borrowings could become immediately due and payable which would likely create significant operating and financial restrictions on us, further causing an adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

Adverse Changes in the Availability and Expense of Components and Materials May Materially Adversely Affect Our Operations.

For our surface mount assemblies and turnkey operations, we purchase components and material from approved suppliers. Any failure on the part of these suppliers to deliver required components to us or any failure of such components to meet performance requirements could impair our ability to meet scheduled shipment dates. This in turn could delay completing our sales and receipt of payment, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, we have experienced, and may in the future experience, shortages of certain types of electronic components. These shortages may increase our costs and may also cause us to experience delays in deliveries to our customers.

In addition, our customers may specify that we purchase parts or materials from particular manufacturers of components for use in the assembly process. Certain components used in a number of our customer programs are obtained from sole source suppliers. To the extent these components are not available on a timely basis or are in short supply because of allocations imposed by the component manufacturer, and the customer is unwilling to accept a substitute component, delays may occur. Such delays are experienced in the EMS business from time to time and have caused sales and inventory fluctuations in our business.

The Reserve Established for the Closure and Transition of Our San Diego Facility (Poway) Was Based on Estimates and, Therefore, May Not Fully Represent All Future Costs For That Facility.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we established a reserve for future costs related to the closure and transition to Moorpark of our San Diego (Poway) facility. In estimating these future costs, we considered the cost of our lease obligation net of estimated future proceeds from subleasing the facility. The facility is currently vacant and if the facility were to remain vacant for an extended period of time during the remaining term of the lease, we may be required to increase the reserve and this could negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

WeSMTEK ~~are~~International, anInc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is an electronics manufacturing services (“EMS”) provider to serving original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) ~~primarily~~ in the medical, industrial ~~controls and~~ instrumentation, telecommunications, security, financial services automation and aerospace and defense industries. We provide integrated solutions to OEMs across the entire product life cycle, from design to manufacturing to end-of-life services, for the worldwide high ~~low-to-medium~~criticality, ~~volume~~high reliability, high complexity segment of the EMS industry.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The following information describes our accounting policies in regards to risks, estimates and subjective assessments whose application may have an impact on our reported results of operations and financial condition.

REVENUE RECOGNITION—All of our subsidiaries recognize revenues once all of the following conditions have been met: a) an authorized purchase order has been received in writing, b) the customer’s credit worthiness has been established, c) shipment of the product has occurred, d) title and risk of ownership has transferred, e) if stipulated by the contract, customer acceptance has occurred and f) all significant vendor obligations, if any, have been satisfied. The majority of our products ship FOB shipping point and, accordingly, in these cases title and risk of ownership pass to the customer upon shipment.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE—We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon each customer’s payment history and current credit worthiness, as determined by credit information available at that time. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and we maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

INVENTORIES—Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined by use of the first-in, first-out method. We write down inventory for slow-moving and obsolete inventory based on assessments of future demands, market conditions and customers which may be experiencing financial difficulties. If these factors are less favorable than those projected, additional inventory write downs may be required.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS—Property, equipment and improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line method. The principal estimated useful lives are: buildings - 20 years; improvements — 5 to 10 years; and plant, office and other equipment - 3 to 7 years. The recoverability of long-lived assets is evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of such assets are believed insufficient to recover the carrying value of the asset, the carrying value is written down to fair value in the period the impairment is identified. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, the following:

• the asset’s ability to continue to generate income;

• loss of legal ownership or title to the asset;

• significant changes in our strategic business objectives and utilization of the asset;

• the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends; or

• a significant decrease in the market value of the asset

ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK OPTIONS— SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended by SFAS No. 148, allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for stock-based awards as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations, compensation expense would generally be recorded for fixed option grants only if, on the date of grant, the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. We have elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for our employee stock option plans and award of options to non-employee directors. See Note 1 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for detail regarding pro forma results, had compensation expense for stock-based awards been determined consistent with SFAS No.123.

VALUATION ALLOWANCE AGAINST DEFERRED TAX ASSETS— In assessing the realizability of net deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of net deferred tax assets is

dependent upon the generation of future income. Based on the level of historical losses, management believes that it does not have the basis to conclude that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized, and therefore, has recorded a 100% valuation allowance to offset the net deferred tax assets.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2003 were $20.7 million compared to $17.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of approximately 17.6%. The increase in revenues was primarily due to the continued shipment of product for existing customers.Revenues

~~Consolidated gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was $2.7 million~~ (~~13.0%~~dollars ~~of sales) compared to $1.5 million (8.7% of sales) for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease~~ in excess capacity which resulted from the closure of the San Diego and European manufacturing facilities in fiscal 2003 was a significant factor in the increase in gross profit. There can be no assurance that capacity utilization will remain at its current level and any decrease in revenues with the resultant under-utilization of capacity could negatively impact our gross profit margin.thousands)

Administrative and selling expenses increased 5% to $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as a parallel to the increase in the Company’s revenues. As a percentage of sales, administrative and selling expense decreased to 9.8% of sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to 11.0% of sales in the same period in fiscal 2003 as we continue to closely monitor our expenditures.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004		2003
Revenues	$	29,855	$	20,692
Percentage Increase	44.3%

~~Total~~More ~~net non-operating~~than ~~income~~48% ~~was~~of ~~$693,000 for~~ the ~~three~~increase ~~months~~in ~~ended~~revenues ~~September 30,~~was ~~2003. This~~attributable ~~non-operating~~to ~~income includes~~new ~~$817,000 gain on extinguishment of debt and currency translation gain of $70,000~~customers. ~~Without these two items,~~The ~~the~~remainder ~~net non-operating expense for the first quarter~~ of ~~fiscal 2004 would have been $194,000 as compared to a net non-operating expense of $250,000 for~~ the ~~three~~ ~~months~~increase ~~ended~~was ~~September 30, 2002. The decrease, on this basis, is primarily~~ attributable to aalready ~~decrease~~established incustomers ~~interest~~increasing ~~expense~~demand ~~reflecting~~for ~~the~~existing ~~decreased debt load~~products.

WeGross had an income tax provision of $37,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to $5,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The income tax provision is primarily related to the State ofprofit

(dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004			2003
Gross Profit	$	3,663		$	2,685
Gross Margin	12.3		%	13.0		%

The decrease in gross margin was primarily related to increased material cost related to product mix. Indirect costs decreased as a percentage of sales. We now operate in four facilities, a decrease from seven throughout much of fiscal 2003 and five through the first two quarters of fiscal 2004. The reduction in excess capacity and the more efficient utilization in the remaining facilities has allowed us to spread fixed costs and apply variable costs over a larger production volume. This factor did not offset the increases in material costs that we have experienced. We cannot be sure that our capacity utilization will remain at its current level and any decrease in revenues with the resultant under-utilization of capacity could negatively impact our gross profit margin.

Administrative and selling expenses

(dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004			2003
Administrative and selling expenses	$	2,009		$	2,027
Percent of sales	6.7		%	9.8		%

Administrative and selling expenses have decreased as a percentage of sales as we continue to closely control our expenditures despite sales volume increases, such control includes limiting increases in staffing.

Interest expense, net

(dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004		2003
Interest expense, net	$	213	$	215

Interest expense is comparable in the comparable periods. Even though we have increased the use of our bank lines of credit to fund production growth and capital expenditures, we have also reduced other debt including the accelerated payoff in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 of several equipment notes aggregating approximately $190,000 and the payment in June 2004 of approximately $2.0 million to fully retire our obligation with the IRS.

Other income, net

(dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004		2003
Other income, net	$	25	$	908

Other income, net of $25,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 consists primarily of an unrealized gain on marketable securities classified as trading securities of $43,000 offset by currency transaction losses in our Thailand facility. Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2003 included $817,000 gain on extinguishment of debt and currency translation gain of $70,000.

Income tax provision

(dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004		2003
Income tax provision	$	129	$	37

~~California~~The ~~which~~income ~~has~~tax ~~suspended~~provision ~~the~~is ~~use~~primarily related to state franchise taxes. The State of ~~net~~California ~~operating~~does ~~losses~~not asallow ~~carryforwards~~us ~~against~~to ~~current~~carry ~~taxable~~forward our net ~~income~~operating losses.

Net income was $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003, or $0.56 per diluted share, compared to net loss of $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, or ($0.53) per diluted share, due mainly to higher revenues, better gross profit and gains as a component of non-operating income. The gains are non-recurring. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will maintain the current levels of revenue or the improved gross profit margin.

(dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30
	2004		2003
Net income	$	1,337	$	1,314

The increase in net income is primarily attributable to higher revenues and control of our expenses. As discussed above under the heading “Other income, net”, there were also certain non-recurring items contributing to net income for the three months ended September 30, 2003, most significantly, a non-recurring $817,000 gain on extinguishment of debt. We cannot assure that we will maintain our current revenue and gross profit margin levels.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents, which amounted to $~~846~~522,000 at September 30, ~~2003~~2004, and amounts available under our bank lines of credit, which provided approximately $24.34 million of availability in excess of ~~current~~ current borrowings at September 30, ~~2003~~2004. During the three months ended September 30, 2003, cash and cash equivalents increased by $263,000. This increase resulted from cash provided by financing activities of $590,000 offset by cash used in operating activities of $259,000 and capital expenditures of $118,000.

~~Net~~Current ~~cash used in operating activities of $259~~assets,~~000~~ ~~for~~current ~~the~~liabilities ~~three months ended September 30, 2003 was attributable primarily to the income from continuing operations before depreciation of $1.8 million reduced by the $817,000 gain from extinguishment of debt~~ and ~~offset by an increase in inventories of $0.8 million and an~~long-term increase in prepaid expenses, of $0.4 million. There were also offsetting increases of $1.3 million in accounts receivable and accounts payable. The increase in working capital accounts was primarily attributable to increased revenue and associated increased cost.debt

~~Net~~The ~~cash~~following ~~used in~~table ~~investing~~sets ~~activities~~forth ~~was~~certain ~~$118,000~~debt ~~for~~and ~~the~~liquidity ~~three months ended September 30,~~measurements ~~2003~~(dollars ~~compared~~in ~~to $711,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The cash used was for the purchase of capital expenditures, primarily for IT infrastructure and software.~~thousands):

Net cash provided by financing activities was $590,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $423,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The borrowings on the line of credit to finance inventory and the proceeds from the sale of preferred stock were partially offset by cash used to retire debt at a discount, as discussed in more detail in Note 7 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

	At September 30, 2004		At June 30, 2004

Working capital	$	13,685	$	10,079
Long-term borrowings, including current portion	$	4,774	$	4,635
Borrowings under bank line of credit	$	10,569	$	8,648
Ratio of current assets to current liabilities	1.67		1.56

InThe ~~September 2003,~~increase ~~we entered into a new long-term credit facility. This new credit facility consists of a $10 million working capital line, a term credit facility~~ in the ~~amount of up to~~ ~~$1.0 million and a capital expenditure facility of $1.0 million. The $10 million~~ working capital ~~line~~ is ~~collateralized~~ byrelated ~~accounts~~primarily ~~receivable,~~to ~~inventory~~our ~~and~~improved ~~equipment~~earnings. ~~Borrowings~~The ~~under~~outstanding ~~the~~balance ~~credit~~of ~~agreement~~our ~~bear interest at either the~~ bank’s ~~prime~~line ~~rate (4.0% at September 26, 2003) plus 1.0%~~of ~~or a Libor-base rate (1.12 at September 26, 2003) plus 3.75%. The working capital~~ credit ~~facility contains various financial covenants and matures September 19~~, ~~2006.~~classified Inas ~~addition~~long-term, ~~in September,~~has ~~2003~~increased weby ~~borrowed~~ $1.9 million onto ~~our term credit facility~~$10. ~~This~~6 ~~advance has a maturity date of~~million ~~September~~in ~~19, 2006 and bears interest at either~~ the ~~bank’s~~first ~~prime~~quarter ~~rate~~of ~~(4.0%~~fiscal ~~at September~~2005 ~~30,~~as ~~2003)~~we ~~plus~~have ~~1.0%~~funded orour aincreased ~~Libor-base rate (1.12% at September 30,~~production ~~2003) plus 3~~levels.~~75%.~~ AtOur ~~September~~availability ~~30, 2003,~~in ~~the~~excess ~~balance~~of borrowings ~~outstanding~~on ~~was $1 million and~~ the ~~effective~~working ~~interest~~capital ~~rate was~~line ~~5.0%. The~~of ~~capital expenditure~~ credit ~~facility~~increased ofby $2.1 million ~~will be used~~ to ~~finance our capital expenditures~~ $4. ~~Each~~4 ~~advance under the capital expenditure credit facility will have a three year term at either the Bank’s prime rate or at a~~million.

~~fixed~~Cash ~~rate~~flows ~~equal~~provided toby ~~the~~(used ~~Libor rate plus 3.75%. We were~~ in ~~compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2003.~~)

WeThe ~~anticipate that~~following ~~additional~~table ~~expenditures~~sets offorth, asfor ~~much~~the asperiods ~~$2.0 million may be incurred during fiscal 2004~~indicated, ~~primarily to improve production efficiency at all our~~selected ~~subsidiaries. A~~consolidated ~~substantial~~cash ~~portion~~flow ~~of these~~information ~~capital~~(dollars ~~expenditures~~in ~~are expected to be financed by our new line of credit or other notes/leases payable.~~thousands):

At September 30, 2003, the ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 1.5 to 1.0 compared to 1.4 to 1.0 at June 30, 2003. At September 30, 2003, we had $8.1 million of working capital compared to $5.7 million at June 30, 2003. At September 30, 2003, we had long-term borrowings of $6.3 million compared to $8.2 million at June 30, 2003. The increase in the working capital and decrease in debt are related to the settlement of certain debt obligations as described below. Related to the decrease in debt, the outstanding balance of our line of credit, classified as long-term, increased by $1.2 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2004			2003
Operating Activities	$	(1,666	)	$	(259	)
Investing Activities	(391		)	(118		)
Financing Activities	2,195			590
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(22		)	50

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	116		$	263

~~During~~The ~~the three~~increase ~~month~~in ~~period~~sales, ~~ending~~particularly ~~September~~in ~~30,~~the ~~2003,~~last wehalf of ~~settled~~the ~~notes~~quarter ~~payable~~ended ~~to former~~September ~~officers~~30, ~~employees~~2004, ~~and~~has ~~directors~~resulted byin ~~paying~~ an ~~aggregate~~increase ofin accounts ~~$430~~receivables,~~000~~ ~~to fully~~as ~~retire~~compared anto ~~aggregate~~the ofsame ~~$889,000~~quarter in ~~debt~~fiscal 2003. In Weaddition, ~~also~~inventory ~~reached~~increased ~~settlement with~~in ~~certain~~preparation ~~sub-debt~~for ~~holders~~a bysecond ~~paying~~quarter anproduction ~~aggregate~~plan ofmore ~~$172,000~~weighted totoward ~~fully~~the ~~retire an~~first ~~aggregate~~half of ~~$520,000~~the insecond ~~debt~~quarter. ~~Also~~An increase ~~during~~in ~~the~~accounts ~~first~~payable ~~quarter~~did ofnot ~~fiscal~~entirely ~~2004,~~compensate wefor ~~sold~~these inuses ~~a private placement 250,000 shares~~ of ~~non-redeemable, convertible Series A Preferred Stock for~~operating ~~$500,000~~funds. ~~The~~Although ~~shares~~inventory ~~are~~levels ~~initially~~are ~~convertible~~higher ~~into~~compared ~~Common Stock on a one~~ to ~~one~~the ~~basis~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~are~~of ~~redeemable,~~fiscal ~~solely at the Company’s option~~2003, atinventory 1½turns ~~times the purchase price after 180 days from~~have ~~issuance~~improved.

OnNet ~~June~~cash ~~27, 2003,~~used wein ~~received~~investing ~~notice~~activities ~~from~~for ~~Nasdaq~~the ~~of its decision to continue listing our~~three ~~common~~months ~~stock~~ended onSeptember ~~The~~30, ~~Nasdaq~~2004 ~~SmallCap~~consists ~~Market via an exception to a number~~ of ~~listing~~ ~~requirements. The~~capital ~~terms~~expenditures of ~~this temporary exception require that~~ ~~we satisfy a number of conditions for continued listing. On October 3~~$391, ~~2003, Nasdaq notified us that we had met the requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market~~000. ~~Nonetheless,~~In ~~Nasdaq~~addition ~~notified~~to usongoing ~~that~~upgrades ~~its Listing Qualifications Panel would continue~~ to ~~monitor~~manufacturing ~~our~~and ~~compliance with~~computer ~~Nasdaq’s shareholders’ equity requirement and~~equipment, inapproximately ~~this regard~~$66,000 ~~we must~~of ~~file~~construction ~~this~~in ~~quarterly~~progress ~~report~~was onrecorded ~~Form 10-Q~~relating onto orthe ~~before~~Thailand ~~November 14, 2003~~facility ~~reporting shareholders’ equity of at least $2,500,000~~expansion.

~~Although~~The ~~we believe~~most ~~that we have currently satisfied Nasdaq’s conditions for continued~~significant ~~listing~~source onof ~~The~~cash ~~Nasdaq~~from ~~SmallCap~~financing ~~Market,~~activities ~~there~~was ~~can~~use beof ~~no assurance that~~ our ~~common~~ ~~stock~~bank ~~will~~line ~~continue~~of tocredit ~~be currently listed on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market or, if it continues~~ to ~~be listed, that we will be able to maintain such listing~~ infund the ~~future~~increasing production. ~~If our common stock were~~Other ~~delisted~~proceeds from ~~The~~financing ~~Nasdaq~~activities ~~SmallCap~~included ~~Market,~~borrowing itagainst ~~may~~our ~~become~~bank ~~eligible immediately~~capital ~~thereafter~~expenditure ~~for~~line ~~quotation~~of oncredit ~~the~~and ~~Over-The-Counter~~proceeds ~~Market~~from on the ~~NASD~~exercise ~~Electronic Bulletin~~of ~~Board or in the “pink sheets” maintained by the National Quotation~~stock ~~Bureau, Inc~~options., which are generally considered to be less efficient systems than markets such as Nasdaq or other national exchanges, and which may also cause difficulty in conducting trades and difficulty in obtaining future financing. ~~Further,~~Cash ~~for~~was ~~companies~~used ~~whose securities are traded in the Over-The-Counter Market, it is more difficult: (i)~~ to ~~obtain~~make ~~accurate quotations, (ii) to obtain coverage for significant news~~recurring ~~events~~payments ~~because~~on ~~major wire services, such as the Dow Jones News Service, generally do not publish press releases about such companies, and (iii) to obtain needed capital~~debt.

WeThailand ~~previously recorded~~credit ~~a liability for a federal tax assessment, including accrued interest, of $2.5 million per a December 2001 settlement with the Appeals division of the IRS. We finalized a payment plan in~~facility

In May 2004, we finalized a Credit Facility Agreement between our subsidiary SMTEK International Thailand Limited (“SMTEK Thailand”) and BankThai Public Company Limited and we unconditionally guaranteed SMTEK Thailand’s liabilities and obligations under the Credit Facility Agreement for the purpose of funding the growth and expansion of our Thailand facility. The credit facility includes a $678,000 mortgage loan for the purchase of the building and land at our Thailand facility. The mortgage has a seven year term with an initial interest rate of 5.75%, based on Thailand Prime Rate, and a monthly payment of approximately $9,000. The Credit Facility Agreement also includes a $440,000 construction loan for the expansion of the Thailand facility. The construction loan has a 78 month term with interest at Thailand Prime Rate and a monthly payment of approximately $5,000. The Credit Facility Agreement also includes a working capital line of approximately $500,000 with interest at Thailand Prime Rate, a one year term and it is collateralized by all the assets of the Thailand facility. All liabilities and obligations under the Credit Facility are denominated in Baht, the currency of Thailand, and therefore the above estimates fluctuate with changes in the Baht to U.S. dollar exchange rate.

~~July 2003~~Wells ~~and~~Fargo atcredit ~~September 30,~~facility ~~2003~~and ~~have~~other ~~a total liability, including accrued interest, of $2.3 million to~~liquidity beand ~~paid~~capital inresources ~~monthly installment payments of $45,000 through July 2008.~~issues

WeIn ~~may~~September ~~experience~~2003, we entered into a new long-term ancredit ~~adverse~~facility with Wells Fargo Business Credit to replace a credit facility with Comerica Bank that had been in effect onat ~~our~~June 30, 2003. In June 2004 the Wells Fargo credit facility was amended to the form under which we are operating ~~results~~as ~~and~~of September 30, 2004. This new credit facility consists of a $15 million working capital line, a term credit facility in ~~our~~the ~~financial~~amount ~~condition~~of up to $1.0 million and a capital expenditure facility of $2.5 million. The $15 million working capital line is collateralized by accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at either the bank’s prime rate (4.75% at September 30, 2004) plus 0.75% ~~our~~or ~~operating~~a ~~subsidiaries~~Libor rate (1.84% at September 30, 2004) plus 3.50%. ~~For~~The ~~further~~working capital credit facility contains ~~discussion~~various financial covenants and matures September 30, ~~see~~2007. The ~~section~~financial ~~entitled~~covenants ~~“Company~~include ~~Risk~~requirements related ~~Factors”~~to net income, stockholders’ equity and debt service ratio. We believe we were in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2004. The term credit facility has a three year term and was used to repay the outstanding balance on our ~~2003~~equipment ~~Form~~line ~~10-K~~of credit. asThe ~~well~~capital asexpenditure credit facility of $2.5 million will be used to finance our capital expenditures. Each advance under the ~~updated~~capital ~~risk~~expenditure ~~factors~~credit ~~set~~facility ~~forth~~will ~~herein~~have a three year term at either the Bank’s prime rate plus 0.75% or, at our option, at a fixed rate equal to the Libor-base rate plus 3.50%.

We ~~may~~anticipate that ~~continue~~additional tocapital ~~experience~~expenditures anof ~~adverse~~as ~~effect~~much onas ~~our~~$2.3 ~~operating~~million ~~results~~may ~~and~~be ~~our~~incurred ~~financial~~during ~~condition~~fiscal ~~if current economic conditions continue for an extended period of time~~2005, ~~despite~~primarily ~~our~~to ~~cost~~improve ~~reduction~~production ~~measures and~~ efficiency ~~improvements made~~ at ~~our~~all ~~operating~~ our subsidiaries. ~~For further~~A ~~discussion,~~substantial ~~see~~portion ~~section~~of these ~~entitled~~capital ~~“Risk~~expenditures ~~Factors~~are ~~That~~expected ~~May Affect Your Decision~~ to ~~Invest~~be infinanced ~~Us”~~by in our ~~2003~~new ~~Form~~line ~~10-K, which was filed with the SEC~~of oncredit ~~September~~or ~~25,~~other ~~2003~~notes/leases payable.

Management believes that our cash resources, cash from operations and available borrowing capacity on our working capital lines of credit are sufficient to fund operations for at least the next 12 months. Long term, however, ~~if current economic conditions continue for an extended period of time,~~ despite our cost reduction measures and efficiency improvements, or if we are unable to continue to increase sales and maintain profitability, we may have to obtain additional debt or equity financing. There can be no assurance that ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing, if and when needed, on terms acceptable to ~~the~~ ~~Company~~us.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Since the early 1990s, we continue to be involved in certain remediation and investigative studies regarding soil and groundwater contamination at the site of a former printed circuit board manufacturing plant in Anaheim, California. One of our former subsidiaries, Aeroscientific Corp., leased the Anaheim facility. Under the terms of a cost sharing agreement entered into several years ago, the remaining remediation costs are currently being shared on a 50-50 basis with the landlord. There is no environmental insurance coverage for this remediation. At September 30, ~~2003~~ 2004, we had a reserve of $~~416~~419,000 for future remediation costs. Management, based in part on consultations with outside environmental engineers and scientists, believes that this reserve is adequate to cover its share of future remediation costs at this site. However, the future actual remediation costs could differ significantly from the estimates. Further, our portion could potentially exceed the amount of our reserve. Our liability for remediation in excess of our reserve could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

that this reserve is adequate to cover its share of future remediation costs at this site. However, the future actual remediation costs could differ significantly from the estimates. Further, our portion could potentially exceed the amount of our reserve. Our liability for remediation in excess of our reserve could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and short-term and long-term debt. At September 30, ~~2003~~2004, the carrying amount of long-term debt (including current portion thereof but excluding bank ~~lines~~line of credit) was $64.38 million and the fair value was $54.83 million. The carrying values of our other financial instruments approximated their fair values. The fair value of our financial instruments is estimated based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. A change in interest rates of one percent would result in an annual impact on interest expense of approximately $60130,000.

It is our policy not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. We may, from time to time, enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts in an effort to protect us from adverse currency rate fluctuations on foreign currency commitments entered into in the ordinary course of business. These commitments are generally for terms of less than one year. The foreign currency forward exchange contracts are executed with banks believed to be creditworthy and are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” all derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is dependent upon whether or not a derivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge and, if so, the type of hedge. Changes in fair value are recognized in current results of operations for fair value hedges and in other ~~comprehensive~~ comprehensive income for cash flow hedges. Derivative financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133, as amended by FAS 149, are recognized as assets or liabilities with gains or losses recognized in current results of operations. At September 30, ~~2003~~2004, we had no forward foreign currency contracts.

Our operations include investments in a foreign operating unit. Our foreign subsidiary represents approximately 912% of our revenues and 9% of our total assets. As a result, our financial results have been and may continue to be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Based on on management’s evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive ~~officer~~ and ~~principal~~ financial officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and ~~principal~~ financial officer ~~have~~ has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and regulations.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our first ~~fiscal~~ fiscal quarter of ~~2004~~2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitation on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our President and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Revised Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals for the 2004 Annual Meeting

We will hold our 2004 Annual Meeting of stockholders on January 26, 2005. Stockholder proposals that are intended to be presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting and included in the Company’s proxy materials relating to the 2004 Annual Meeting must be received by the company no later than November 16, 2004. All stockholder proposals must be in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in order to be considered for possible inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2004 Annual Meeting.

If a stockholder wishes to present a proposal at the Company’s 2004 Annual Meeting and the proposal is not intended to be included in the Company’s proxy statement relating to the 2004 Annual Meeting, the stockholder must give advance notice to the Company prior to the deadline for the annual meeting determined in accordance with the Company’s bylaws (the “Bylaw Deadline”). Stockholder proposals intended for presentation at the 2004 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company’s Secretary no later than the 90th day prior to the annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. If a stockholder gives notice of such proposal after the Bylaw Deadline, the stockholder will not be permitted to present the proposal to the stockholders for a vote at the meeting. All stockholder proposals must be in the form required by the Company’s bylaws.

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, we experience various types of claims which sometimes result in litigation or other legal proceedings. We do not anticipate that any of these claims or proceedings that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on us.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

~~Sale~~Conversion of ~~Unregistered~~Series ~~Securities~~A Preferred Stock

OnIn ~~September 8,~~July ~~2003~~2004, ~~we sold~~ 250,000 shares of ~~our~~preferred ~~Series~~stock Aand accrued ~~Preferred~~dividends ~~Stock~~of ~~for~~approximately $~~500~~36,000 ~~to The~~were ~~Gene~~converted ~~Haas~~by ~~Trust in a private placement transaction. The proceeds from~~ the ~~sale~~holder ~~of the Series A~~into ~~Preferred~~268,369 ~~Stock is expected to be used for general corporate purposes. The~~ shares of ~~the Series A Preferred Stock are convertible into our~~ common stock ~~initially~~(see onNote a7 ~~one-~~to~~-one~~ ~~basis and are redeemable, solely at our option, at 1.5 times~~ the ~~purchase~~unaudited ~~price after 180~~Condensed ~~days~~Consolidated ~~from~~Financial ~~the date of issuance~~Statements). ~~The issuance of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock was exempt from registration pursuant to Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.~~

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On August 25, 2003 we held a special meeting of stockholders to approve an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to decrease the number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock by means of a reverse stock split with a ratio of not less than two-for-three and not more than one-for-two.NONE

The total number of shares voting on the proposed reverse stock split was 2,142,887, of which 975,634 shares were voted for the proposal, 1,166,185 shares were voted against the proposal and 1,068 abstained. A primary purpose behind the reverse stock split proposal was to maintain the eligibility of our common stock for continued listing on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, in seeking to comply with Nasdaq’s $1.00 minimum bid price requirement. Despite the vote against the reverse stock split proposal, Nasdaq has since notified us that the price of our common stock currently complies with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirements.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

a.	Exhibits:
a. Exhibits:
4.1			Certificate of Designations (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2003).
31.1+		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
10.1			Credit and security Agreement dated September 19, 2003, by and among Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc., SMTEK International, Inc., Jolt Technology, Inc., SMTEK New England, Inc., SMTEK Santa Clara, Inc. and Technetics, Inc.
31.2+		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
10.2			Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2003 by and between the Company and The Gene Haas Trust
32.1+		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
32.2+		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.

22+ Filed herewith

		(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s current report on From 8-K filed on September 8, 2003).
10.3		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2003, by and between the Company and The Gene Haas Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2003).
31.1		Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
31.2		Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
32.1		Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
32.2		Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.

b. Current reports on Form 8-K:

On July 1, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K announcing that we had received notice from the Nasdaq Qualifications Hearings Panel of its decision to continue listing our common stock on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market via a temporary exception to a number of listing requirements.

On September 8, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K announcing that we had met the requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the ~~regis-trant~~registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

October 31, 2003		/s/ Kirk A. Waldron
November 8, 2004	/s/ Kirk A. Waldron
Date	Kirk A. Waldron	~~Kirk A. Waldron~~
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
	Interim President,
	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer

Filing Compare · SMTEK INTERNATIONAL INC