UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from ~~____________to~~ to ____________

Commission File Number: 0-17619

American Tax Credit Properties L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	13-3458875
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Identification No.)
Organization)	Identification No.)

Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.
340 Pemberwick Road
Greenwich, Connecticut	06831
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (203) 869-0900

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ~~___~~

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No ~~___~~

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ~~___~~ o Accelerated Filer ~~___~~ o Non-Accelerated Filer ~~___Smaller~~o Smaller Reporting Company X x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ~~___~~ No X

As of ~~February~~August 812, 2013, there are 41,286 units of limited partnership interest outstanding.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Table of Contents
		~~Page~~	Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements.
Balance Sheets		3	3
Statements of Operations		4
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)			4
Statements of Cash Flows		5	5
Notes to Financial Statements		7	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	10	9
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.	14	12
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	14	12

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	December 30,			March 30,
	June 29,			March 30,
	2012			2012
	2013			2013
ASSETS
Cash and liquid investments
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,258,531		$	2,286,126
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,298,859		$	29,291
Investment in Pemberwick Fund - a short duration bond fund		925,473			928,287
Investment in Pemberwick Fund - a short duration bond fund		924,641			1,164,251
	$	3,184,004		$	3,214,413
Total cash and liquid investments		3,223,500			1,193,542
Due from local partnerships					87,500
Investment in local partnerships					568,392
	$	3,223,500		$	1,849,434
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	5339,~~675~~450		$	9754,~~253~~630
Payable to general partner and affiliates		656,~~573~~773			8427,~~235~~088
		60,248			181,488
		96,223			81,718
Commitments and contingencies
Partners' equity (deficit)
General partner		(334,~~163~~871	)		(~~349~~334,~~034~~477	)
Limited partners (41,286 units of limited partnership interest outstanding)		3,~~488~~417,~~021~~857			23,~~015~~456,~~746~~864
Accumulated other comprehensive income		94,~~394~~795			110,~~234~~308
		3,163,252			1,667,946
		3,087,781			3,132,695
	$	3,~~223~~184,~~500~~004		$	13,~~849~~214,~~434~~413

See Notes to Financial Statements.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

THREE ~~AND~~MONTHS ~~NINE MONTH PERIODS~~ ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3029, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended December 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended December 30, 2012			Three Months Ended December 30, 2011			Nine Months Ended December 30, 2011
	2013			2012
REVENUE
Interest	$	52,~~884~~976		$	123,~~821~~434		$	~~4,442~~		$	~~11,197~~
Other income from local partnerships								2,500			2,500
TOTAL REVENUE		2,976			3,434
TOTAL REVENUE		5,884			12,821			6,942			13,697
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
Administration fees		16,808			19,541
Administration fees		17,393			54,722			30,591			95,060
Management fee		16,053			18,663
Management fee		16,611			52,262			29,216			90,787
Professional fees		7,679			14,978
Professional fees		15,380			47,184			7,686			46,043
State of New Jersey filing fee					17,840
State of New Jersey filing fee		17,840			53,520			11,545			34,633
Printing, postage and other		1,837			3,535
Printing, postage and other		5,440			12,935			1,205			10,537
TOTAL EXPENSES		42,377			74,557
TOTAL EXPENSES		72,664			220,623			80,243			277,060
		(39,401	)		(71,123	)
		(66,780	)		(207,802	)		(73,301	)		(263,363	)
Equity in income of investment in local partnerships					5,981
Equity in income (loss) of investment in local partnerships					(10,295	)		55,092			144,463
LOSS PRIOR TO GAIN ON SALE OF LIMITED PARTNER INTERESTS/LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROPERTIES		(39,401	)		(65,142	)
Loss prior to gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties		(66,780	)		(218,097	)		(18,209	)		(118,900	)
GAIN ON SALE OF LIMITED PARTNER INTERESTS/ LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROPERTIES					1,658,428
Gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties		30,539			1,705,243						358,750
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(39,401	)		1,593,286
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(36,241	)		1,487,146			(18,209	)		239,850
Other comprehensive income (loss) - Pemberwick Fund		(5,513	)		1,002
Other comprehensive income (loss) - Pemberwick Fund		(1,794	)		8,160			(1,155	)		(29,936	)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	(44,914	)	$	1,594,288
Reclassification of unrealized gain on investment in bond											(2,730	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	(38,035	)	$	1,495,306		$	(19,364	)	$	207,184
General partner	$	(394	)	$	15,933
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO
Limited partners		(39,007	)		1,577,353
General partner	$	(363	)	$	14,871		$	(182	)	$	2,399
	$	(39,401	)	$	1,593,286
Limited partners		(35,878	)		1,472,275			(18,027	)		237,451
NET INCOME (LOSS) per unit of limited partnership interest (41,286 units of limited partnership interest)	$	(0.94	)	$	38.21
	$	(36,241	)	$	1,487,146		$	(18,209	)	$	239,850
NET INCOME (LOSS) per unit of limited partnership interest (41,286 units of limited partnership interest)	$	(.87	)	$	35.66		$	(.44	)	$	5.75

See Notes to Financial Statements.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3029, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(UNAUDITED)

	2012			2011
	2013			2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Interest received	$	122,~~821~~976		$	173,~~462~~434
Cash paid for
Administration fees		(843,~~335~~176	)		(~~160~~3,~~726~~217	)
Management fees		(100,311	)		(150,000	)
Professional fees		(15,779	)		(47,998	)
Professional fees		(58,294	)		(57,997	)
State of New Jersey filing fee		(1,438	)		(83,950	)
State of New Jersey filing fee		(83,950	)		(62,475	)
Printing, postage and other expenses		(7,479	)		(5,573	)
Printing, postage and other expenses		(14,973	)		(16,632	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(24,896	)		(137,304	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(329,042	)		(430,368	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investments in Pemberwick Fund		(102,~~661~~699	)		(123,~~795~~353	)
Redemptions from Pemberwick Fund		~~258,431~~			84,922
Distributions received from local partnerships		~~87,500~~			237,500
Proceeds in connection with sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties		~~2,263,340~~			~~308~~2,~~750~~232,801
Proceeds from redemption of investment in bond					91,000
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(2,699	)		2,351,870
Net cash provided by investing activities		2,598,610			389,455
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(27,595	)		2,214,566
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,286,126			29,291
Distributions to partners					(64,097	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	2,258,531		$	2,243,857
Net cash used in financing activities					(64,097	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,269,568			(105,010	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		29,291			154,743
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	2,298,859		$	49,733
SIGNIFICANT NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment in Pemberwick Fund	$	8(5,~~160~~513	)	$	~~(29~~1,~~936~~002	)
Reclassification of unrealized gain on investment in bond				$	(2,730	)
Decrease in deferred revenue in connection with sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties				$	50,000

See reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities on page 6.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED

~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3029, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(UNAUDITED)

	2012			2011
	2013			2012
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,487,146		$	239,850
Net income (loss)	$	(39,401	)	$	1,593,286
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities
Equity in loss (income) of investment in local partnerships		10,295			(144,463	)
Equity in income of investment in local partnerships					(5,981	)
Gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties		~~(1,705,243~~	)		(~~358~~1,~~750~~658,428	)
Other income from local partnerships					(2,500	)
Increase in prepaid expenses					(17,840	)
Amortization of premium on investment in bond					1,228
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(15,180	)		(83,328	)
Loss on redemption of investment in bond					4,914
Increase in due to general partner and affiliates		29,685			34,987
Decrease in interest receivable					123
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	(24,896	)	$	(137,304	)
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(43,578	)		(45,891	)
Decrease in due to general partner and affiliates		(77,662	)		(124,879	)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	(329,042	)	$	(430,368	)

See Notes to Financial Statements.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3029, ~~2012~~2013

(UNAUDITED)

1.	Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the “Partnership”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. They do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The results of operations are impacted, in part, by the combined results of operations of the Partnership’s investee partnerships (the “Local Partnerships”), which are provided by the general partners of the Local Partnerships (the “Local General Partners”) on an unaudited basis during interim periods. Accordingly, the accompanying unaudited financial statements are dependent on such unaudited information. In the opinion of the general partner of the Partnership (the “General Partner”), the accompanying unaudited financial statements include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013 and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

The accompanying unaudited statement of cash flows for the nine months ended December 30, 2011 reflects distributions to partners of $64,097. Such amount was re-characterized as an expense in the Partnership’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended March 30, 2012.

2.	Investment in Local Partnerships

The Partnership initially acquired limited partner equity interests (the “Local Partnership Interests”) in nineteen partnerships (the “Local Partnerships”) representing capital contributions in the aggregate amount of $36,228,149, which includes voluntary advances (the “Advances”) made to certain Local Partnerships and all of which has been paid. As of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013, the Partnership holds a Local Partnership Interest in three Local Partnerships (see discussion below regarding the ~~proposed~~ ~~sales~~potential sale of the Partnership’s ~~three~~ remaining Local Partnership Interests). The Partnership has no legal obligation to fund any operating deficits of the Local Partnerships. The results of operations of the Local Partnerships are provided by the general partners of the Local Partnerships (the “Local General Partners”) on an unaudited basis during interim periods.

~~For~~In the ~~nine~~event ~~months~~the ~~ended~~operations ~~December~~of 30a Local Partnership result in a loss, ~~2012~~equity in loss of each investment in Local Partnership allocated to the Partnership is recognized to the extent of the Partnership’s investment balance in each Local Partnership. Equity in loss in excess of the Partnership’s investment balance in a Local Partnership is allocated to other partners’ capital in any such Local Partnership. As a result of cumulative equity losses and distributions, and the sales of certain Local Partnerships’ Properties and/or the Partnership’s Local Partnership Interests, the Partnership’s investment in local partnerships ~~activity~~reached ~~consists~~a ofzero balance during the ~~following:~~year ended March 30, 2013.

Investment in local partnerships as of March 30, 2012	$	568,392
Equity in loss of investment in local partnerships		(10,295	) *
Distributions from local partnerships		(2,263,340	)
Gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties		1,705,243
Investment in local partnerships as of December 30, 2012	$	--

During the year ended March 30, 2013, the Partnership entered into contracts to sell its Local Partnership Interests in Santa Juanita Limited Dividend Partnership L.P. (“Santa Juanita”) and Vista del Mar Limited Dividend Partnership L.P. (“Vista del Mar”) to an affiliate of the Local General Partners of Santa Juanita and Vista del Mar; there will be no proceeds in connection with the proposed sales. Such Local Partnerships have the same Local General Partner. The proposed sales are subject to the approval of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”); there can be no assurance that HUD will approve either or both of the contracts. After accounting for its share of cumulative income, losses and distributions, the Partnership’s investment in Santa Juanita and Vista del Mar reached a zero balance in a prior year.

*InDuring the ~~event~~year ended March 30, 2013, the ~~operations~~Partnership ofentered into a contract to sell its Local Partnership ~~result~~Interest in aCobbet ~~loss,~~Hill ~~equity~~Associates inLimited ~~loss~~Partnership of(“Cobbet”) ~~each~~to ~~investment~~one inof the Local ~~Partnership~~General ~~allocated~~Partners toof Cobbet; there will be no proceeds in connection with the ~~Partnership~~proposed issale. ~~recognized~~One toof the ~~extent~~Local General Partners of Cobbet is an affiliate of the ~~Partnership’s~~General ~~investment~~Partner; ~~balance~~such Local General Partner is not involved in ~~each~~the ~~Local~~proposed ~~Partnership~~sale. ~~Equity~~The inproposed ~~loss~~sale inis ~~excess~~subject ofto the ~~Partnership~~approval of Cobbet’s ~~investment~~mortgage ~~balance~~lender, inthe aMassachusetts ~~Local~~Housing ~~Partnership~~Finance isAgency ~~allocated~~(“MHFA”); tothere ~~other~~can ~~partners~~be no assurance that MHFA will approve the contract. After accounting for its share of cumulative income, losses and distributions, the Partnership’s ~~capital~~investment in ~~any~~Cobbet ~~such~~reached ~~Local~~a ~~Partnership~~zero balance in a prior year.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3029, ~~2012~~2013

(UNAUDITED)

2.	Investment in Local Partnerships (Continued)

InCobbet ~~May~~was ~~2012,~~originally ~~Madison-Bellefield~~financed ~~Associates~~with a first mortgage with mandatory monthly payment terms with MHFA and a second mortgage with MHFA under the State Housing Assistance for Rental Production Program (the “~~Madison-Bellefield~~SHARP Operating Loan”) ~~sold~~whereby ~~its~~proceeds ~~underlying~~would ~~Property~~be toadvanced monthly as an ~~affiliate~~operating ofsubsidy (the ~~Local~~“Operating ~~General~~Subsidy ~~Partners~~Payments”). The terms of ~~Madison-Bellefield,~~the inSHARP ~~connection~~Operating ~~with~~Loan ~~which~~called ~~the~~for ~~Partnership~~declining ~~received~~Operating ~~$2,263,340~~Subsidy Payments over its term (not more than 15 years). ~~After~~However, ~~accounting~~due ~~for~~to ~~its~~the ~~share~~economic condition of ~~cumulative~~the ~~income,~~Northeast ~~losses~~region ~~and~~in ~~distributions~~the early 1990’s, MHFA instituted an operating deficit loan (the ~~Partnership~~“ODL”) ~~recognized~~program athat ~~gain~~supplemented ofthe $scheduled reduction in the Operating Subsidy Payments. Effective October 1,~~705~~ 1997,~~243~~ inMHFA ~~connection~~announced ~~with~~its intention to eliminate the ~~sale~~ODL program, ~~which~~such ~~amount~~that isCobbet ~~reflected~~no aslonger ~~gain~~receives onthe ~~sale~~ODL, ofwithout ~~limited~~which ~~partner~~Cobbet ~~interests/local~~has ~~partnership~~been ~~properties~~unable into make the ~~accompanying~~full ~~unaudited~~mandatory ~~statement~~debt service payments on its first mortgage. MHFA issued a formal notice of ~~operations~~default ~~for~~dated February 2, 2004. Since the ~~nine~~date ~~months~~MHFA ~~ended~~ceased funding the ODL through December 3031, 2012., ~~Madison-Bellefield~~Cobbet has ~~since~~accumulated ~~been~~over ~~dissolved.~~$13,134,000 ~~After~~of ~~such~~arrearages ~~sale~~ and other charges on the first mortgage; as a result of ~~cumulative~~the ~~equity losses~~default, ~~distributions~~ principal and ~~the~~accrued ~~sale~~interest ofin ~~certain~~excess ~~Local~~of ~~Partnerships’~~$26,000,000 ~~Properties~~in ~~and/or~~connection with the ~~Partnership’s~~first ~~Local Partnership Interests~~mortgage, the ~~Partnership’s~~SHARP ~~investment~~Operating inLoan ~~local~~and ~~partnerships~~the ~~reached~~ODL aare ~~zero~~considered ~~balance~~currently due.

In August 2012, the Partnership sold its Local Partnership Interest in Gulf Shores Apartments Ltd. (“Gulf Shores”) to the Local General Partner of Gulf Shores; no proceeds were received in connection with the sale. The Partnership’s investment balance in Gulf Shores, after cumulative equity losses and distributions, became zero during the year ended March 30, 1996.

In December 2012, the Partnership entered into contracts to sell its Local Partnership Interests in Santa Juanita Limited Dividend Partnership (“Santa Juanita”) and Vista del Mar Limited Dividend Partnership (“Vista del Mar”) to an affiliate of the Local General Partners of Santa Juanita and Vista del Mar; there will be no proceeds in connection with the proposed sales. Such Local Partnerships have the same Local General Partner. The proposed sales are subject to the approval of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”); there can be no assurance that HUD will approve either or both of the contracts. The Partnership’s investment balance in Santa Juanita and Vista del Mar, after cumulative equity losses and distributions, became zero during the years ended March 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

In December 2012, the Partnership entered into a contract to sell its Local Partnership Interest in Cobbet Hill Associates Limited Partnership (“Cobbet”) to one of the Local General Partners of Cobbet; there will be no proceeds in connection with the proposed sale. One of the Local General Partners of Cobbet is an affiliate of the General Partner; such Local General Partner was not involved in the proposed sale. The proposed sale is subject to the approval of Cobbet’s mortgage lender, the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency (“MHFA”); there can be no assurance that MHFA will approve the contract. The Partnership’s investment balance in Cobbet, after cumulative equity losses and distributions, became zero during the year ended March 30, 1994.

Cobbet was originally financed with a first mortgage with mandatory monthly payment terms with MHFA and a second mortgage with MHFA under the State Housing Assistance for Rental Production Program (the “SHARP Operating Loan”) whereby proceeds would be advanced monthly as an operating subsidy (the “Operating Subsidy Payments”). The terms of the SHARP Operating Loan called for declining Operating Subsidy Payments over its term (not more than 15 years). However, due to the economic condition of the Northeast region in the early 1990’s, MHFA instituted an operating deficit loan (the “ODL”) program that supplemented the scheduled reduction in the Operating Subsidy Payments. Effective October 1, 1997, MHFA announced its intention to eliminate the ODL program, such that Cobbet no longer receives the ODL, without which Cobbet has been unable to make the full mandatory debt service payments on its first mortgage. MHFA issued a formal notice of default dated February 2, 2004. Since the date MHFA ceased funding the ODL through December 31, 2011, Cobbet has accumulated over $11,685,000 of arrearages and other charges on the first mortgage; as a result of the default, principal and accrued interest in excess of $25,000,000 in connection with the first mortgage, the SHARP Operating Loan and the ODL are considered currently due. Cumulative Advances made by the Partnership to Cobbet as of December 30, 2012 total $392,829, none of which were made during the nine months then ended. Such Advances were recorded as investment in local partnerships and were written off as additional equity in loss of investment in local partnerships.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

DECEMBER 30, 2012

(UNAUDITED)

3.	Investment in Pemberwick Fund

The Partnership carries its investment in Pemberwick Fund, a short duration bond fund (“Pemberwick”) at estimated fair value. The fair value of the Partnership’s investment in Pemberwick is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy of the guidance on Fair Value Measurements as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820. Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the ability to access. Pemberwick’s net asset value (“NAV”) is $10.1106 per share as of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013. An unrealized gain of $94,~~394~~795 is reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying unaudited balance sheet as of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013. As of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013, the Partnership has earned $4955,~~821~~252 of interest revenue from its investment in Pemberwick.

4.	Additional Information

Additional information, including the audited March 30, ~~2012~~2013 Financial Statements and the Organization, Purpose and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, is included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, ~~2012~~2013 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Material Changes in Financial Condition

As of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013, American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the “Registrant”) has not experienced a significant change in financial condition as compared to March 30, ~~2012,~~2013. ~~primarily~~Principal aschanges ~~the result of proceeds received~~ in ~~connection~~assets ~~with~~are ~~Madison-Bellefield~~comprised ~~Associates’ (“Madison-Bellefield”) sale~~ of ~~its~~periodic ~~underlying~~transactions ~~operating property (see discussion below under Results of Operations~~ and ~~Local Partnership Matters)~~adjustments. Registrant owns a limited partner equity interest (the “Local Partnership Interests”) in ~~operating~~ partnerships (the “Local Partnerships”), which own low-income multifamily residential complexes (the “Properties”) that qualified for the low-income housing tax credit (the “Low-income Housing Tax Credit”) in accordance with Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. ~~Principal changes in assets are comprised of periodic transactions and adjustments and equity in income (loss) from operations of the Local Partnerships.~~ During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013, Registrant received cash from interest revenue, ~~proceeds~~and inutilized ~~connection~~cash ~~with~~for ~~Madison-Bellefield’s~~operating ~~sale~~expenses ofand ~~its~~investments ~~underlying~~in ~~Property, redemptions from~~ Pemberwick Fund, a short duration bond fund (“Pemberwick”) ~~and distributions from Local Partnerships and utilized cash for operating expenses and investments in Pemberwick~~. Cash and cash equivalents and investment in Pemberwick ~~increased~~decreased, in the aggregate, by approximately $230,~~030,~~000 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013 (which includes an unrealized ~~gain~~loss on investment in Pemberwick of approximately $86,000). During the nine months ended December 30, 2012, investment in local partnerships decreased as a result of Madison-Bellefield’s sale of its underlying Property. Madison-Bellefield was the only Local Partnership in which Registrant continued to have an investment balance (see discussion below under Results of Operations and Local Partnership Matters). After such sale, and as a result of cumulative equity losses, distributions and the sale of certain Local Partnerships’ Properties and/or Registrant’s Local Partnership Interests, Registrant’s investment in local partnerships reached a zero balance. Payable to general partner and affiliates represents accrued administration and management fees in the accompanying unaudited balance sheet as of ~~December~~June 3029, ~~2012~~2013.

Results of Operations

Registrant’s operating results are dependent, in part, upon the operating results of the Local Partnerships and are impacted by the Local Partnerships’ policies. In addition, the operating results herein are not necessarily the same for tax reporting. Registrant accounts for its investment in local partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the investment is carried at cost and is adjusted for Registrant’s share of each Local Partnership’s results of operations and by cash distributions received. In the event the operations of a Local Partnership result in a loss, equity in loss of each investment in Local Partnership allocated to Registrant is recognized to the extent of Registrant’s investment balance in each Local Partnership. Equity in loss in excess of Registrant’s investment balance in a Local Partnership is allocated to other partners’ capital in any such Local Partnership. As a result of ~~Madison-Bellefield’s sale of its underlying Property (see discussion below under Local Partnership Matters), and as a result of~~ cumulative equity losses, and distributions, and the ~~sale~~sales of certain Local Partnerships’ Properties and/or Registrant’s Local Partnership Interests, Registrant’s investment in local partnerships reached a zero balance during the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended ~~December~~March 30, ~~2012~~2013.

Cumulative losses and cash distributions in excess of investment in local partnerships may result from a variety of circumstances, including a Local Partnership's accounting policies, subsidy structure, debt structure and operating deficits, among other things. Accordingly, cumulative losses and cash distributions in excess of the investment are not necessarily indicative of adverse operating results of a Local Partnership.

10Registrant’s operations for the three months ended June 29, 2013 and 2012 resulted in net income (loss) of $(39,401) and $1,593,286, respectively. The decrease in net income is primarily attributable to (i) gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties of approximately $1,658,000 recognized in fiscal 2012 resulting from a Local Partnership’s sale of its underlying Property, partially offset by a decrease in operating expenses of approximately $32,000. Other comprehensive loss for the three months ended June 29, 2013 resulted from an unrealized loss on investment in Pemberwick of $5,513.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued).

Registrant’s operations for the three months ended December 30, 2012 and 2011 resulted in net losses of $36,241 and $18,209, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in equity in income of investment in local partnerships of approximately $55,000, which is attributable to a decrease in the net operating income of the Local Partnership in which Registrant continued to have an investment balance, partially offset by an increase in gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties of approximately $31,000 in connection with Madison-Bellefield’s sale of its underlying Property (see discussion below under Local Partnership Matters). Other comprehensive loss for the three months ended December 30, 2012 resulted from an unrealized loss on investment in Pemberwick of $1,794.

Registrant’s operations for the nine months ended December 30, 2012 and 2011 resulted in net income of $1,487,146 and $239,850, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to (i) an increase in gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties of approximately $1,346,000 in connection with Madison-Bellefield’s sale of its underlying Property (see discussion below under Local Partnership Matters) and (ii) a decrease in administration and management fees in the aggregate of approximately $79,000, all partially offset by a decrease in equity in income of investment in local partnerships of approximately $155,000, which is attributable to a decrease in the net operating income of the Local Partnership in which Registrant continued to have an investment balance. Other comprehensive income for the nine months ended December 30, 2012 resulted from an unrealized gain on investment in Pemberwick of $8,160.

Local Partnership Matters

Registrant's primary objective, to provide Low-income Housing Tax Credits to its limited partners (the “Limited Partners”), has been completed. The relevant state tax credit agency allocated each of the Local Partnerships an amount of Low-income Housing Tax Credits, which are generally available for a ten year period from the year the Property is placed in service (the “Ten Year Credit Period”). The Ten Year Credit Period was fully exhausted with respect to all of the Properties as of December 31, 2003. The required holding period of each Property, in order to avoid Low-income Housing Tax Credit recapture, is fifteen years from the year in which the Low-income Housing Tax Credits commence on the last building of the Property (the "Compliance Period"). The Compliance Period of all of the Local Partnerships had expired as of December 31, 2004. In addition, certain of the Local Partnerships entered into agreements with the relevant state tax credit agencies whereby the Local Partnerships must maintain the low-income nature of the Properties for a period which exceeds the Compliance Period (in certain circumstances, up to 50 years from when the Property is placed in service, but commonly 30 years from the date any such Property is placed in service), regardless of a sale of the Properties by the Local Partnerships after the Compliance Period (the “Extended Use Provisions”). Although the Extended Use Provisions do not extend the Compliance Period of the respective Local Partnerships, such provisions may limit the number and availability of potential purchasers of the Properties. Accordingly, a sale of a Property may happen well after the expiration of the Compliance Period and/or may be significantly discounted. Registrant is in the process of disposing of its remaining Local Partnership Interests. As of ~~February~~August 2013, Registrant owns three of the nineteen Local Partnership Interests initially acquired. ~~See~~(see discussion below regarding the ~~proposed~~potential ~~sales~~sale of Registrant’s ~~three~~ remaining Local Partnership Interests). In a prior year, Registrant served a demand on the general partners of all then remaining Local Partnerships (the “Local General Partners”) to commence a sale process to dispose of the Properties. In the event a sale cannot be consummated, it is the General Partner’s intention to sell or assign Registrant’s remaining Local Partnership Interests. ~~Following~~It ~~the~~is ~~final~~uncertain ~~disposition~~as ofto ~~its~~the ~~Local Partnership~~amount, ~~Interests~~if any, that Registrant ~~intends~~will toreceive ~~dissolve.~~with ~~There~~respect ~~can~~to beeach nospecific ~~assurance~~Property asfrom tosuch ~~when~~sales or assignments. Registrant ~~will~~intends ~~dispose~~to ofdissolve after the ~~Local~~final ~~Partnership~~disposition ~~Interests,~~of ~~when~~its ~~the~~remaining Local ~~Partnerships~~Partnership ~~will~~Interests; ~~dispose~~there ofcan ~~the~~be ~~Properties,~~no orassurance ~~the~~as ~~amount~~to ofwhen ~~proceeds~~Registrant ~~which~~will ~~may~~dispose beof ~~received~~its inremaining ~~such~~Local ~~dispositions~~Partnership Interests.

11The three remaining Properties are principally comprised of subsidized and leveraged low-income multifamily residential complexes located in Massachusetts and Puerto Rico. The three remaining Local Partnerships receive rental subsidy payments under Section 8 of Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 ("Section 8”). The Section 8 contracts expire at various times. Since October 1997, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) has issued a series of directives related to project based Section 8 contracts that define owners’ notification responsibilities, advise owners of project based Section 8 properties of what their options are regarding the renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide guidance and procedures to owners, management agents, contract administrators and HUD staff concerning renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide policies and procedures on setting renewal rents and handling renewal rent adjustments and provide the requirements and procedures for opting-out of a Section 8 project based contract. Registrant cannot reasonably predict legislative initiatives and governmental budget negotiations, the outcome of which could result in a reduction in funds available for the Section 8 program. Such changes could adversely affect the future net operating income before debt service (“NOI”) and debt structure of any or all of the remaining Local Partnerships. The remaining Local Partnerships’ Section 8 contracts are currently subject to renewal under applicable HUD guidelines. Two of the three remaining Local Partnerships entered into restructuring agreements in a prior year, resulting in a change to both rent subsidy and mandatory debt service.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued).

The remaining Properties are comprised of subsidized and leveraged low-income multifamily residential complexes located in Massachusetts and Puerto Rico. The remaining Local Partnerships receive rental subsidy payments under Section 8 of Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 ("Section 8”). Since October 1997, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) has issued a series of directives related to project based Section 8 contracts that define owners’ notification responsibilities, advise owners of project based Section 8 properties of what their options are regarding the renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide guidance and procedures to owners, management agents, contract administrators and HUD staff concerning renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide policies and procedures on setting renewal rents and handling renewal rent adjustments and provide the requirements and procedures for opting-out of a Section 8 project based contract. Registrant cannot reasonably predict legislative initiatives and governmental budget negotiations, the outcome of which could result in a reduction in funds available for the Section 8 program. Such changes could adversely affect the future net operating income before debt service (“NOI”) and debt structure of the remaining Local Partnerships. The remaining Local Partnerships’ Section 8 contracts are currently subject to renewal under applicable HUD guidelines. Two of the remaining Local Partnerships entered into restructuring agreements in a prior year, resulting in a change to both rent subsidy and mandatory debt service.

The Local Partnerships have various financing structures which include (i) required debt service payments ("Mandatory Debt Service") and (ii) debt service payments that are payable only from available cash flow subject to the terms and conditions of the notes, which may be subject to specific laws, regulations and agreements with appropriate federal and state agencies ("Non-Mandatory Debt Service or Interest"). Registrant has no legal obligation to fund any operating deficits of the Local Partnerships.

InDuring ~~May~~the ~~2012~~year ended March 30, ~~Madison-Bellefield~~2013, ~~sold~~Registrant ~~its~~entered ~~underlying~~into ~~Property~~contracts to ansell ~~affiliate~~its ofLocal ~~the~~Partnership ~~Local~~Interests ~~General~~in ~~Partners~~Santa ofJuanita ~~Madison-Bellefield,~~Limited inDividend ~~connection~~Partnership ~~with~~(“Santa ~~which~~Juanita”) ~~Registrant~~and ~~received~~Vista ~~$2,263,340.~~del ~~After~~Mar ~~accounting~~Limited ~~for~~Dividend ~~its~~Partnership ~~share~~(“Vista ofdel ~~cumulative~~Mar”) ~~income,~~to ~~losses~~an ~~and~~affiliate ~~distributions,~~of ~~Registrant~~the ~~recognized~~Local aGeneral ~~gain~~Partners of ~~$1,705,243~~Santa inJuanita ~~connection~~and ~~with~~Vista ~~the~~del ~~sale,~~Mar; ~~which~~there ~~amount~~will isbe ~~reflected~~no asproceeds ~~gain~~in onconnection ~~sale~~with ofthe ~~limited~~proposed ~~partner~~sales. ~~interests/local~~Such ~~partnership~~Local ~~properties~~Partnerships inhave the ~~accompanying~~same ~~unaudited~~Local ~~statement~~General ofPartner. ~~operations~~The ~~for~~proposed ~~the~~sales ~~nine~~are ~~months~~subject ~~ended~~to ~~December~~the ~~30,~~approval ~~2012.~~of ~~Madison-Bellefield~~HUD; ~~has~~there ~~since~~can ~~been~~be ~~dissolved.~~no ~~After~~assurance ~~such~~that ~~sale~~HUD ~~and~~will asapprove aeither ~~result~~or both of ~~cumulative~~the ~~equity~~contracts. ~~losses,~~After ~~distributions~~accounting ~~and~~for ~~the~~its ~~sale~~share of ~~certain~~cumulative ~~Local Partnerships’~~income, ~~Properties~~losses and~~/or~~ ~~Registrant’s Local Partnership Interests~~distributions, Registrant’s investment in ~~local~~Santa ~~partnerships~~Juanita and Vista del Mar reached a zero balance in a prior year.

InDuring ~~August~~the ~~2012~~year ended March 30, 2013, Registrant ~~sold~~entered into a contract to sell its Local Partnership Interest in ~~Gulf~~Cobbet ~~Shores~~Hill ~~Apartments~~Associates ~~Ltd.~~Limited Partnership (“~~Gulf Shores~~Cobbet”) to one of the Local General ~~Partner~~Partners of ~~Gulf Shores~~Cobbet; nothere ~~proceeds~~will ~~were~~be ~~received~~no proceeds in connection with the proposed sale. ~~Registrant’s~~One ~~investment~~of ~~balance~~the Local General Partners of Cobbet is an affiliate of the General Partner; such Local General Partner is not involved in ~~Gulf~~the ~~Shores~~proposed sale. The proposed sale is subject to the approval of Cobbet’s mortgage lender, ~~after~~the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency (“MHFA”); there can be no assurance that MHFA will approve the contract. After accounting for its share of cumulative ~~equity~~income, losses and distributions, ~~became~~Registrant’s ~~zero~~investment ~~during~~in ~~the~~Cobbet ~~year~~reached ~~ended~~a ~~March~~zero ~~30,~~balance ~~1996~~in a prior year.

InCobbet ~~December~~was ~~2012,~~originally ~~Registrant entered~~financed ~~into~~with ~~contracts~~a tofirst ~~sell~~mortgage ~~its~~with ~~Local~~mandatory ~~Partnership~~monthly ~~Interests~~payment interms ~~Santa~~with ~~Juanita~~MHFA ~~Limited~~and ~~Dividend~~a ~~Partnership~~second mortgage with MHFA under the State Housing Assistance for Rental Production Program (the “~~Santa~~SHARP ~~Juanita~~Operating Loan”) ~~and~~whereby ~~Vista~~proceeds ~~del~~would ~~Mar~~be ~~Limited~~advanced ~~Dividend~~monthly ~~Partnership~~as an operating subsidy (the “~~Vista~~Operating ~~del~~Subsidy ~~Mar~~Payments”). The terms of the SHARP Operating Loan called for declining Operating Subsidy Payments over its term (not more than 15 years). However, due to anthe ~~affiliate~~economic condition of the ~~Local~~Northeast ~~General~~region ~~Partners~~in ofthe ~~Santa~~early ~~Juanita~~1990’s, ~~and~~MHFA ~~Vista~~instituted ~~del~~an ~~Mar;~~operating ~~there will~~deficit beloan ~~no proceeds~~(the in“ODL”) ~~connection~~program ~~with~~that supplemented the ~~proposed~~scheduled ~~sales~~reduction in the Operating Subsidy Payments. ~~Such~~Effective ~~Local~~October ~~Partnerships~~1, ~~have~~1997, MHFA announced its intention to eliminate the ~~same~~ODL ~~Local~~program, ~~General~~such ~~Partner.~~that ~~The~~Cobbet ~~proposed~~no ~~sales~~longer ~~are~~receives ~~subject~~the ODL, without which Cobbet has been unable to make the ~~approval~~full ofmandatory ~~HUD;~~debt ~~there~~service ~~can~~payments beon noits ~~assurance~~first ~~that~~mortgage. ~~HUD~~MHFA ~~will~~issued ~~approve~~a ~~either~~formal ornotice ~~both~~ of ~~the~~default ~~contracts~~dated February 2, 2004. ~~Registrant’s~~Since ~~investment~~the ~~balance~~date inMHFA ~~Santa~~ceased ~~Juanita~~funding ~~and~~the ~~Vista~~ODL ~~del~~through ~~Mar~~December 31, ~~after~~2012, ~~cumulative equity~~Cobbet ~~losses~~has ~~and~~accumulated ~~distributions~~over $13,134,000 ~~became~~of ~~zero~~arrearages ~~during~~and other charges on the ~~years~~first ~~ended~~mortgage; ~~March~~as 30a result of the default, ~~2003~~principal and ~~2002~~accrued interest in excess of $26,000,000 ~~respectively~~in connection with the first mortgage, the SHARP Operating Loan and the ODL are considered currently due.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued).

In December 2012, Registrant entered into a contract to sell its Local Partnership Interest in Cobbet Hill Associates Limited Partnership (“Cobbet”) to one of the Local General Partners of Cobbet; there will be no proceeds in connection with the proposed sale. One of the Local General Partners of Cobbet is an affiliate of the General Partner; such Local General Partner was not involved in the proposed sale. The proposed sale is subject to the approval of Cobbet’s mortgage lender, the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency (“MHFA”); there can be no assurance that MHFA will approve the contract. Registrant’s investment balance in Cobbet, after cumulative equity losses and distributions, became zero during the year ended March 30, 1994.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accompanying unaudited financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which requires Registrant to make certain estimates and assumptions. The following section is a summary of certain aspects of those accounting policies that may require subjective or complex judgments and are most important to the portrayal of Registrant’s financial condition and results of operations. Registrant believes that there is a low probability that the use of different estimates or assumptions in making these judgments would result in materially different amounts being reported in the accompanying unaudited financial statements.

●· Registrant accounts for its investment in local partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting.

● Registrant does not consolidate the accounts and activities of the Local Partnerships, which are considered Variable Interest Entities as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810; Subtopic 10 because Registrant is not considered the primary beneficiary. Registrant’s balance in investment in local partnerships represents the maximum exposure to loss in connection with such investments. Registrant’s exposure to loss on the Local Partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying Properties as well as the financial strength of the Local General Partners. In addition, the Local Partnerships’ partnership agreements grant the Local General Partners the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Local Partnerships’ economic success. As a result of cumulative equity losses and distributions and the sale of certain Local Partnerships’ Properties and/or Registrant’s Local Partnership Interests, Registrant’s investment in local partnerships reached a zero balance during the nine months ended December 30, 2012.11

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued).

Registrant does not consolidate the accounts and activities of the Local Partnerships, which are considered Variable Interest Entities as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810; Subtopic 10 because Registrant is not considered the primary beneficiary. Registrant’s balance in investment in local partnerships represents the maximum exposure to loss in connection with such investments. Registrant’s exposure to loss on the Local Partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying Properties as well as the financial strength of the Local General Partners. In addition, the Local Partnerships’ partnership agreements grant the Local General Partners the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Local Partnerships’ economic success. As a result of cumulative equity losses and distributions, and the sale of certain Local Partnerships’ Properties and/or Registrant’s Local Partnership Interests, Registrant’s investment in local partnerships reached a zero balance during the year ended March 30, 2013.

Forward-Looking Information

As a cautionary note, with the exception of historical facts, the matters discussed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, current expectations, forecasts of future events, future actions, future performance generally, business development activities, capital expenditures, strategies, the outcome of contingencies, future financial results, financing sources and availability and the effects of regulation and competition. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “estimate” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with discussions of future operating or financial performance signify forward-looking statements. Registrant may also provide written forward-looking statements in other materials released to the public. Such statements are made in good faith by Registrant pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the Reform Act. Registrant undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Such forward-looking statements involve known risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Registrant’s actual results of operations or actions to be materially different from future results of operations or actions expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

Registrant’s ~~investment in Pemberwick~~ is ~~subject~~a tosmaller ~~certain~~reporting ~~risk.~~company The fixed income securities in which Pemberwick invests are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk, prepayment risk, counterparty risk, liquidity risk, management risk, government security risk and valuation risk. Typically, when interest rates rise, the market prices of fixed income securities go down. Pemberwick is classified as ~~“non-diversified,”~~defined ~~and thus may invest most of its assets in securities issued~~ by orRule ~~representing~~12b-2 ~~a small number~~ of ~~issuers. As a result, Pemberwick may be more susceptible to~~ the ~~risks~~Exchange ~~associated~~Act ~~with these particular issuers, or to a single economic, political or regulatory occurrence affecting these issuers. These risks could adversely affect Pemberwick’s net asset value (“NAV”), yield~~ and ~~total return. An unrealized gain of $9,394~~ is ~~reflected~~not asrequired ~~accumulated~~to ~~other~~provide ~~comprehensive income in~~ the ~~accompanying~~information ~~unaudited~~required ~~balance~~under ~~sheet~~this ~~as of December 30, 2012~~Item. ~~As of December 30, 2012, Registrant has earned $49,821 of interest revenue from its investment in Pemberwick.~~

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Registrant in reports that Registrant files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and timely reported as provided in SEC rules and forms. Registrant periodically reviews the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, including compliance with various laws and regulations that apply to its operations. Registrant makes modifications to improve the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, and may take other corrective action, if its reviews identify a need for such modifications or actions. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, Registrant recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

Registrant has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the General Partner, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the three months ended December 30, 2012. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the General Partner concluded that Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 30, 2012.12

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Continued).

~~There~~Registrant ~~were~~has nocarried ~~changes~~out an evaluation, under the supervision and the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the General Partner, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ~~Registrant’s~~Rule 13a-15(e) and ~~internal~~15d-15(e) under ~~control~~the ~~over~~Exchange ~~financial~~Act), ~~reporting~~as ~~during~~of the three months ended ~~December~~ 30June 29, ~~2012~~2013. ~~that~~Based ~~have~~upon ~~materially~~that ~~affected~~evaluation, orthe ~~are~~Chief ~~reasonably~~Executive ~~likely~~Officer toand ~~materially~~Chief ~~affect,~~Financial Officer of the general partner of the General Partner concluded that Registrant’s ~~internal~~disclosure ~~control~~controls ~~over~~and ~~financial~~procedures ~~reporting~~were effective as of June 29, 2013.

15There were no changes in Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 29, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.
	None.
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.
	In connection with the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2012, Registrant has disposed of its then remaining four Local Partnership Interests, although three such interests have been sold pending lender and/or agency approval (see Item 2 of Part I for further disclosure).
	There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2013.
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
	None.
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
	None; see Item 2 of Part I regarding the mortgage default of a certain Local Partnership.
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.
	Not applicable.
Item 5.	Other Information.
	None.
Item 6.	Exhibits.
	Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
	Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
	Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
	Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
	Exhibit 101.ins - XBRL Instance.*
	Exhibit 101.xsd - XBRL Schema.*
	Exhibit 101.cal - XBRL Calculation.*
	Exhibit 101.def - XBRL Definition.*
	Exhibit 101.lab - XBRL Label.*
	Exhibit 101.pre - XBRL Presentation.*
	*The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shallnot be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

	Exhibit 31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

	Exhibit 31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

	Exhibit 32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

	Exhibit 32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

	Exhibit 101.ins	XBRL Instance.*

	Exhibit 101.xsd	XBRL Schema.*

	Exhibit 101.cal	XBRL Calculation.*

	Exhibit 101.def	XBRL Definition.*

	Exhibit 101.lab	XBRL Label.*

	Exhibit 101.pre	XBRL Presentation.*

*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
		(a Delaware limited partnership)
		By: Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
		By:Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
		General Partner
		By: Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
		By:Richman Tax Credit Properties, Inc.,
		general partner
Dated: February 8, 2013		/s/David Salzman
Dated: August 12, 2013		/s/David Salzman
		By: David Salzman
		Chief Executive Officer
Dated: February 8, 2013		/s/James Hussey
Dated: August 12, 2013		/s/James Hussey
		By: James Hussey
		By:James Hussey
		Chief Financial Officer
Dated: February 8, 2013		/s/Richard Paul Richman
Dated: August 12, 2013		/s/Richard Paul Richman
		By: Richard Paul Richman
		By:Richard Paul Richman
		Sole Director

1715

Filing Compare · AMERICAN TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES LP