UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010)



x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to ____________

Commission File No. 000-33251

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Formerly INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.)



NEVADA	33-0903004
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification)



620 Newport Center Drive Suite 570, Newport Beach, CA	92660
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (949) ~~903~~219-~~1792~~0530

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: none

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: 389,570,001 common shares par value $0.001 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the ~~Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x~~

~~Indicate~~ bySecurities ~~check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the~~ Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d)

of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.




Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of ~~October~~June 530, ~~2009~~2010 was approximately $322,~~815~~805,~~113~~000based ~~based~~ upon the closing price of $0.~~038~~0051 reported for such date on The OTC Bulletin Board.

As of ~~October~~June 530, ~~2009~~2010 the registrant had 1,~~389~~390,~~570~~302,001 outstanding shares of Common Stock.

Documents incorporated by reference: None.

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Page~~PAGE PART I Item 1. Business 3 Item 1A. Risk Factors 912 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 1114 Item 2. Properties 1214 Item 3. Legal Proceedings. 1215 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. 1215 PART II Item 5. Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 1315 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 1416 Item 7. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 1417 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures ~~About~~about Market Risk 1720 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ~~F-1~~20 Item 9. Item 8A.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. 1820 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 1833 Item 9B. Other Information 1933 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance. 1934 Item 11. Executive Compensation. 2135 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. 2136 Item 13. Certain Relationships ~~and~~And Related Transactions, and Director Independence 2237 Item 14. Principal ~~Accountant~~Accounting Fees ~~and~~And Services 2237 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules. 2237 ~~Signatures~~SIGNATURES 2338

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Information included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. This information typically involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.

Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, assumptions that we will be able to successfully obtain additional capital on commercially reasonable terms sufficient to implement our business plan, develop and market products and services which achieve market acceptance and generate sales revenues at reasonable margins, and ultimately increase income streams from sales of products and services. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

~~whether~~Whether we will continue as a going concern;

~~whether~~Whether we will obtain sufficient additional capital, in the form or debt or equity or some combination, and on commercially reasonable terms, such that we can carry out our business plan.;

~~whether~~Whether we will be able to consummate favorable agreements with or strategic partners for the marketing and distribution of products and services which have viable markets and good margins..;

~~whether~~ Whether our products and services will be received favorably in the market place, and generate significant sales revenues, and reasonable margins which allow us to generate income and cash flow, permit us to grow our business, and ultimately achieve profitability.

Given such uncertainties, among others, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake, and the Company specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences, developments, events or circumstances after the date of such statement.

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business

OVERVIEW

The registrant (sometimes referred to the "Company" or "NDT") during the past year has continued to develop broaden ~~its scope of business, discontinuing all food company operations, and devoting all of its resources and attention to developing~~ a technology marketing and distribution business. As a result, it should be considered a development stage company, and has yet to realize revenues in its ~~redirected~~ business.

The Company has underway the development, positioning and initial marketing of several different innovative wireless technology solutions which it hopes to sell to Fortune 500 companies and their clients. The Company has developed through strategic alliances with other companies, a portfolio of competencies in the following wireless technologies: (1) RFID (radio frequency identification); (2) WiMax; (3) Digital Signage/LED lighting; and (4) Security & Surveillance solutions. However, in the past year the Company has elected to narrow its initial focus on marketing and distributing only RFID and Digital Signage/LED lighting solutions and will hold off on initiating sales and marketing efforts on it WiMax and Security & Surveillance solutions.

HISTORY

Newport Digital Technologies, Inc. (“NDT” or the “Company”), formerly Golden Choice Foods Corporation dba Golden Choice Foods, was incorporated in April 1996 pursuant to the laws of the state of Delaware and commenced a business in the marketing and distribution of consumer products, with an emphasis on food products.

On June 1, 2000, the Company re-domiciled in the state of Nevada. In April, 2001 the Company changed ~~it’s~~its name to International Food Products Group, Inc. and became a fully reporting Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pursuant to Section (g) thereof. In October of 2001, NDT filed with the NASD its application for a listing symbol on the OTC Bulletin Board and initiated trading thereafter of its common shares under the symbol “IFDG”, on the OTCBB.

In 2008, the Company underwent a significant restructuring of its business, and now focuses its business on the marketing and distribution of high technology products.

As a result, on May 5, 2009 the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to change the Company’s name from International Food Products Group, Inc., to Newport Digital Technologies, Inc. On April 17, 2009, the Company was issued a new CUSIP number under its new name, Newport Digital Technologies, Inc., and subsequently commenced trading under its new symbol “NPDT”, on the OTCBB.

DEFINITIONS

Electronic Product Code (EPC) – EPC is a family of coding schemes, created as a low-cost method for tracking goods using RFID technology. It is designed to meet the needs of various industries, while guaranteeing that all EPC-compliant tags have a unique serial number. EPC tags are designed to identify each item manufactured, as opposed to just its manufacturer and product class, as bar codes do today. The EPC accommodates existing coding schemes and defines new schemes where necessary.

The Electronic Product Code promises to become the standard for global RFID usage. EPCglobal, in conjunction with various industries, is also developing standards for sharing data over the EPCglobal Network®. Together, these technologies will enable companies to automate the tracking of goods through the supply chain, as well as reduce inventory, cut shipping errors and increase sales by making sure products are where they need to be when customers want to buy them. Many companies are already achieving these benefits.

RFID tags - RFID tags are devices used for Radio-frequency identification (RFID). RFID is the process or method of automatically identifying radio frequencies. The RFID tag consists of mainly a microchip that is combined with an antenna or coil. The antenna picks up signals from an RFID reader and then returns the signal with additional information. The chip or integrated circuit is used to store the information that is collected from the signals picked up. The chip can also be used to process this information or to modulate and demodulate the tracked signal. However, some RFID tags are chip-less. This means that it does not make use of any integrated circuit to store information. The RFID tag instead uses fiber or materials that reflect a portion of the reader's signal back; the unique return signal can be used as an identifier. Its advantage over traditional RFID tags is that they can be used in several different environments and are also less sensitive to temperature changes and radio frequency interference.

The size of the RFID tag can vary. It can be very small like a grain of sand or large enough to compare with a small book. The RFID tag can be applied to a product, an animal or a human being for the purposes of identification. It does this by tracking the information needed using radio waves and thus can be read from a long distance off even when there is no direct line of sight. RFID data can therefore be read through the human body, clothing and non-metallic materials.

RFID tags can either be active, passive or semi-passive. Active RFID tags require an internal power source to power the integrated circuit and then broadcast the response signal to the reader. The power source can be a replaceable battery or a sealed unit or can be connected to an external power source. Passive RFID tags on the other hand do not contain an internal power source. When radio waves are encountered, an electrical current is induced in the antenna to form a magnetic field. This power is what is used to power up the passive RFID tag. Semi-passive RFID tags have their own internal power source which powers the chip but not the broadcasting of the signal. The response is powered when the energy is reflected back to the reader.

EPC Global RFID readability criteria – EPCglobal is leading the development of industry-driven standards for the Electronic Product Code™ (EPC) to support the use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) in today’s fast-moving, information rich, trading networks. EPC Global sets industry standards and criteria for how RFID tags and readers read.

POS checkout - Point of sales (POS) or checkout refers to both a checkout counter in a shop, and the location where a transaction occurs. Colloquially, a "checkout" refers to a POS terminal or more generally to the hardware and software used for checkouts, the equivalent of an electronic cash register. A POS terminal manages the selling process by a salesperson accessible interface. The same system allows the creation and printing of the voucher.

3G cellular data communication - 3G is the third generation of wireless technologies. It comes with enhancements over previous wireless technologies, like high-speed transmission, advanced multimedia access and global roaming. 3G is mostly used with mobile phones and handsets as a means to connect the phone to the Internet or other IP networks in order to make voice and video calls, to download and upload data and to surf the net.

EPC Class 1 Gen 2 Passive Reader Module - Commonly known as the "Gen 2" standard, this standard defines the physical and logical requirements for a passive-backscatter, Interrogator-talks-first (ITF), radio-frequency identification (RFID) system operating in the 860 MHz - 960 MHz frequency range. The system comprises Interrogators (also known as Readers), and Tags (also known as Labels).

The UHF Class-1 Generation-2 air interface protocol V1.2.0 extends the item-level tagging capabilities of UHF Gen 2. In this protocol, 3 optional features have been added. An indicator is now available to show when there is formatted data in user memory. Addition of permalocking on a block level in user memory now protects contents that have already been written. Recommissioning of a tag after POS operations is now available. The recommissioned action is indicated through the inclusion of extended protocol control bits.

EPC Gen 2 UHF Protocol V.1.0.9 Certification – This is an EPC Global Certification Standard that tests both conformance and interoperability for UHF (Ultra high Frequency) RFID readers/tags. Its operating frequency range is 902MHZ -- 928MHZ on 50 channels with one or two antenna options.

WiMAX, meaning Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access, is a telecommunications technology that provides wireless transmission of data using a variety of transmission modes, from point-to-multipoint links to portable and fully mobile internet access. The technology provides broadband speed without the need for cables. The name "WiMAX" was created by the WiMAX Forum, which was formed in June 2001 to promote conformity and interoperability of the standard. The forum describes WiMAX as "a standards-based technology enabling the delivery of last mile wireless broadband access as an alternative to cable and DSL.

Radio-frequency identification (RFID). This is the use of an RFID tag applied to or incorporated into a product, animal, or person for the purpose of identification and tracking using radio waves. Most RFID tags contain at 4 parts, 1) CPU for processing data, 2) Memory to store information, 3) Power supply to provide power to the tag, 4) Antenna system to allow the reader and tag to communicate wirelessly. There are generally two types of RFID tags: active RFID tags, which contain a battery and can transmit signals autonomously, and passive RFID tags, which have no battery and require an external source to invoke signal transmission. The tags are read by specialized RFID readers. The Company and III/ITRI’s RFID readers and tags are intended for enterprise supply chain management and asset tracking to improve the efficiency of inventory tracking and management.

VOIP. Voice Over Internet Protocol or VOIP VoIP is an IP telephony term for a set of facilities used to manage the delivery of voice information over the Internet. VoIP involves sending voice information in digital form in discrete packets rather than by using the traditional circuit-committed protocols of the public switched telephone network (PSTN). A major advantage of VoIP and Internet telephony is that it avoids the tolls charged by ordinary telephone service.

THE COMPANY’S STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

The Company ~~plans~~has toidentified ~~identify~~ and plans to commercialize customer-driven technology solutions in its identified competencies through a strategic alliance with two Taiwan technology research and development (R&D) incubators, the Institute Information Industry (III) and Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI.). III and ITRI were established in 1979 as non-governmental organizations, jointly sponsored by the Taiwan government and prominent private enterprises, for the purpose of strengthening the developments of information industry in Taiwan. These alliances give us the opportunity to develop, license and sell technology and products developed by III and ITRI, which we can customized to our customers’ specifications for sale into the U.S. and international markets.

The Company’s strategic partner, ITRI, has significant experience in industrial RFID technologies from asset tracking to global container tracking systems. ITRI managed the first EPC Global Certified Performance and Conformance Laboratories in Asia and has developed a range of RFID tags, devices and solutions which have been developed, tested and certified.

Through III, ITRI and The Company's own resources, the Company has access to many IT engineers, manufacturers and suppliers in Taiwan, China, and Japan. Our target markets include medium to large business to business enterprises. Our manufacturing strategy is a demand pull system, where commercial production commences only after customers place orders, thereby mitigating some of the inventory costs and risks to ~~The~~the Company.

ANTICIPATED PRODUCTS TO BY MARKETED AND SOLD BY THE COMPANY

5The Company, in conjunction with III and ITRI, is working toward commercializing a number of what it considers leading edge RFID technology solutions. These include a comprehensive line of mobile computing products and solutions targeted toward RFID field applications for asset tracking, inventory management and point-of-sale for various vertical business to business markets. The Company had expected that these RFID products will include Electronic Product Code (EPC) Global certification laboratories, ruggedized, military/commercial-grade RFID enabled, mobile handheld/tablet computers, RFID Forklifts, RFID tags, but in the past 12 months has decided to forego the risk and expense of developing the EPC Global certification laboratories and will instead focus on selling it RFID enabled hand held devises as well as RFID tags.

The Company, in conjunction with III and ITRI, is working toward commercializing a number of what it considers leading edge RFID technology solutions. These include a comprehensive line of mobile computing products and solutions targeted toward RFID field applications for asset tracking, inventory management and point-of-sale for various vertical business to business markets. The Company expects that these RFID products will include Electronic Product Code (EPC) Global certification laboratories, ruggedized, military/commercial-grade RFID enabled, mobile handheld/tablet computers, RFID Forklifts, RFID tags.7

The Company is working with ITRI in collaboration with several technology partners to develop an end-to-end RFID solution in three phases. First, it plans to ~~develop~~work with a third party company to gain access to an EPC Global Certification Lab that will “certify” supplier’s products as compliant with EPC global RFID readability criteria; second, it plans to initiate sales of RFID hardware and software systems to ~~retailers~~customers who will use RFID for inventory, asset tracking and POS checkout activities; and third, the Company plans to initiate RFID tag sales.

RFID Reader Chip. The Company has reached an agreement with ITRI to distribute an RFID reader system that is integrated to work with an RFID chip with a patented 5-layer security. This reader is being packaged together with the Company’s N37B military grade (ruggedized) handheld mobile computer with RFID reader, GPS and 3G cellular data communication options which will be marketed through global channel distributors. The Company ~~intends~~had intended to negotiate a distribution agreement with AT&T to market and distribute an AT&T version of the N37B to its Special Vertical Market (SVM) channel for industrial, military and supply chain markets. Instead, the Company chose to develop a distribution agreement with Ingram Micro, the world’s largest technology distributor, to channel the N37B military grade (ruggedized) handheld computer with RFID, 3G wireless, and GPS product line to systems integrators and value added resellers. In the past six months the company has gained full product listing within Ingram Micro’s inventory system, has commenced conducting sales training activities with Ingram Micro sales and marketing team, and has gained access to the data base of Ingram Micro clients who have purchased similar products in the past 18 months. The Company is now actively pursuing revenue from these clients through the relationship with Ingram Micro.

Handheld RFID Field Computer. The Company has entered into a distribution agreement with Ingram Micro, one of the larger technology distribution and SI companies in the world, contemplating the launch of its version of the N37B military grade (ruggedized) handheld computer with RFID, 3G wireless, and GPS. The Company plans to work with Ingram Micro to sell this computing solution to their vertical market space which includes petro-chemical, military, and supply chain distribution/logistics. The agreement provides that Ingram Micro will provide future support for the Company with sales and marketing efforts to help promote the Company’s products to its customer base.

Portable RFID Readers. The Company has entered into an agreement with III and ITRI to distribute what III and ITRI call the world's smallest EPC Gen 2 Class 1 Passive Reader Module. The miniaturized RFID reader module is a lower cost front-end device designed for a portable RFID reader. The reader module incorporates an R1000 chip set and will be the smallest RFID reader on the market and the only one which will pass the EPC Gen 2 UHF Protocol V.1.0.9 Certification which includes Conformance Test and Interoperability Test. Its operating frequency will range from 902MHZ -- 928MHZ on 50 channels with one or two antenna options. There are plans for integration into this reader module of a very unique security protocol that is capable of reading under the EPC Global Gen 2 layer, an enhanced tag reading protocol on specific Gen 2 RFID readers allowing for a more dense reader, thereby allowing improved reading performance when many RFID tags are present in a close proximity to one another. This RFID reader module is anticipated to read not only the EPC Global Gen 2 layer RFID define tags but also five layer encrypted secure layers, one layer for each section of a supply chain (Manufacturing, Transportation, Distribution, Warehouse and Retail), or for such other data gathering and tracking purposes as the user may designate Both the RFID reader and the RFID tag are expected to be manufactured in Taiwan and the Company plans to distribute both through the sales channel partnerships that it is currently in the process of developing.

Digital Signage. Through its relationship with III, The Company has entered into a strategic relationship with FormoLight Technologies, Inc., a Taiwan-based professional manufacturer specializing in LED Display Systems for both indoors and outdoors and LED Street Lighting Systems. FormoLight also provides proficient integral services in project management, customized software, installations, testing, and maintenance. FormoLight has installed large scale projects in high profile sports arena and stadiums around the world The Company’s intent is to assist FormoLight in expanding its LED Digital Signage capability into large scale, customized Digital Signage solutions that the Company will then market and sell through strategic sales channel partners in the United States. The Company has secured non-exclusive worldwide marketing and distribution rights to Formolight’s products and solutions. Additionally, for any technology or solution that The Company and FormoLight “jointly develop”, the Company will have exclusive global marketing and distribution rights.

The Company plans to market and sell customized digital signage solutions through collaboration with AT&T, integrating AT&T’s wireless network capabilities into the Digital Signage solution thereby enabling content to be sent to the signage over the wireless network and eliminating the need for direct cable connectivity. This will enable Digital signage to be ubiquitous in many locations, such as on the sides of city buses, trains or taxis as well as in more traditional signage locations.

~~Surveillance.~~In ~~III~~June, 2010, the Company formally launched its sales and ~~ITRI~~marketing ~~have~~efforts ~~developed~~for ~~Security~~its digital signage and ~~Surveillance~~LED ~~Technologies~~lighting ~~which~~solutions at the ~~Company~~Infocomm ~~intends~~trade show in Las Vegas. The response to ~~market~~the ~~and~~product ~~sell,~~line was strong and ~~which~~the ~~management~~Company ~~believes~~is ~~will~~now ~~have~~actively ~~abroad~~pursuing ~~application~~revenue ~~and~~with ~~provide~~a ~~advanced~~number ~~security~~of ~~solutions~~clients ~~for~~and ~~national~~anticipates ~~border,~~digital ~~port,~~signage ~~home,~~revenue ~~business~~in ~~and~~the ~~public~~current ~~environments~~fiscal year. The Company is also establishing a distribution arrangement with Ingram Micro to sell its digital signage solutions through to Ingram Micro’s clients.

Surveillance. III and ITRI have developed Security and Surveillance Technologies which the Company intends to market and sell, and which management believes will have abroad application and provide advanced security solutions for national border, port, home, business and public environments. But as mentioned above, the Company will delay the sales and marketing of any surveillance products until it has successfully launched its RFID and digital signage products.

VOIP. The Company has entered a strategic relationship with Tecom, a telecommunications giant based in Taiwan, to develop VOIP solutions including a wireless VOIP consumer handset and commercial grade non-KSU VOIP phone system for business. But because VoIP technology has become a commodity product, the Company has elected to forego this business.

The Company had signed an agreement with the III and GIL Technologies of Taiwan to sell and install WiMax technology in Northern Italy. Due to capital constraints, the Company has not yet launched its marketing and sales with Gil, but management is in the process of renegotiating and finalizing the development of the Gil sales channel, and the Company intends to implement marketing and sales efforts once and if the Company is able to obtain sufficient capital resources to proceed with this program, and provided certain terms of the Gil agreement can be successfully renegotiated.

TECHNOLOGY LICENSED

WIMAX. The Company has signed a licensing agreement for Microsoft’s mobile operating platform, for use in telecommunications products including the Company’s N37B handheld computer with advanced RFID capability.

MARKETING

~~Since June of 2008,~~ The Company has been developing business strategies to market its anticipated products, services and technologies through systems integrators and large companies and government agencies in the U.S. and international markets. The end user target market planned by management for The Company’s products and solutions are medium to large business -to -business customers in Information Technology, Retail, Telecommunications, Medical, Logistics, and Defense markets.

The Company has commenced discussions with a major retailer for the development of RFID solutions for its inventory management systems.

COMPETITION

RFID. Our primary competitor in the RFID handheld is Motorola. Motorola has been developing RFID handhelds for about 10 years and has a well developed line of RFID handheld products to meet many RFID scanning applications. Motorola is well entrenched with in large Fortune 500 companies. Other RFID handheld competitors include, Unitech, Advantech, and USI.

In the RFID tag space, the primary competitors are Avery Dennison and Raflatac. Avery Dennison and Raflatac are part of very large group of paper manufacturers and have the ability to ramp up production on an RFID tag very quickly. Avery Dennison and Raflatac’s RFID chip sets are some of the best in the market. Avery Dennison is using the Monza 3 RFID chip (manufactured by impinj) and Raflatac has the Higgs 3 RFID chip (manufactured by Alien).

Security and Surveillance. Our primary competitors in the security surveillance space is BRS Labs, 3VR, Aventura Technologies and Sarnoff Corporation. BRS Labs has some of the most sophisticated video analytics software in the market that includes basic Artificial Intelligence (AI) to monitor video anomalies. 3VR has a DVR/video analytics all-in-one solution that has advanced biometric and a easy to use event or person recall function.

Digital Signage

NDT’s competitors in the digital signage space are Panasonic, LG, Samsung, Vizio, Sharp, Toshiba. Each of these companies is substantially larger, better capitalized, with more employees, well funded, R & D programs, a strong and loyal customer base, and years of experience in the market place.

WiMax

NDT’s competitors for WiMax Base Stations are Alvarion, Tecom, and Fujitsu.

Each of these companies is substantially larger, better capitalized, with more employees, well funded, R & D programs, a strong and loyal customer base, and years of experience in the market place.

VOIP

NDT’s competitors for VOIP market space are Belkin, Vertical, AT&T, and Verizon.

Each of these companies is substantially larger, better capitalized, with more employees, well funded, R & D programs, a strong and loyal customer base, and years of experience in the market place.

EMPLOYEES

Many of NDT's operations are conducted through the use of independent contractors. Independent contractors perform such duties as selling, manufacturing, shipping and computer services. Because of this policy, NDT currently has 125 full time employees.

GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS

The Company may be subject to certain import/export regulations but the Company is not certain as to which regulations will pertain to its business.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We are the subject of a going concern opinion by our independent auditors who have raised substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. We have experienced recurring net losses from operations, which losses have caused an accumulated deficit of approximately $15(11,~~261~~485,~~120~~411) ofat June 30, ~~2009~~2010. In addition, we ~~have~~had noa working capital deficit as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 of $(1,522,395. We had net losses of $3(6,~~775~~593,~~709~~233) and $1(3,~~329~~775,~~337~~ 709)for the years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Assurances cannot be given that adequate financing can be obtained to meet our capital needs. If we are unable to generate profits and are unable to continue to obtain financing to meet our working capital requirements, we may have to curtail our business sharply or cease operations altogether. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate additional debt or equity financing, and thereafter establish sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis to retain such financing, to obtain additional financing, and, ultimately, to attain profitability. Should any of these events not occur, we will be adversely affected and we may have to cease operations.

We May Not Be Able to Generate Sales Or Otherwise Successfully Implement Our Business Plan, Which Could Have a Significant Negative Impact on Our Financial Condition.

Our business plan calls for development, marketing and sale of cutting edge technology based products and services, developed based on the technology of our strategic partners. If we are unable negotiate favorable contracts for such technology with our partners, or if the products and services we choose to develop and market are not favorably received in the market place and do not generate significant sales and revenues at reasonable profit margins to us, we will not be able to generate enough revenue to achieve and maintain profitability or to continue our operations..

We are Currently Dependent on External Financing

Currently, we are dependent upon external financing to fund our operations. It is imperative that we receive this external financing to implement our business plan and to finance ongoing operations. New capital may not be available and adequate funds may not be sufficient for our operations, and may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to our management. Our failure to obtain adequate additional financing would require us to delay, curtail or scale back some or all of our operations and would hinder our ability to implement our business plan or continue our business.

We Do Not Own or Operate a R&D (RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT) Engineering Team to Develop New Technology or Products

We do not own or operate a research facility or RSD team, nor do we develop new technology or products. We must rely on the research and development activities or our strategic partners. If our agreements without Strategic partners were to terminate for any reason, we would likely find it difficult to find comparable services and relationships with new strategic partners on comparable terms. This would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, and our efforts to implement our business plan.

We Expect Our Targeted Markets to Become Increasingly Competitive and, in the Event We are Unable to Compete against Larger Competitors, Our Business Could Be Adversely Affected

We expect our business to faces competition from other companies developing products and services competitive with our targeted products and services. Competitors with greater access to financial resources may enter our markets and compete with us. We expect that many of our competitors will have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, longer relationships with customers, and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and public relations resources than we do. Established companies with competing products or services who have substantially greater financial resources and longer operating histories than us could have a significant adverse impact on our ability to implement our business plan and generate revenues, cash flows and ultimately profitability for our Company.

We Could Fail to Attract or Retain Key Personnel, Which Could Be Detrimental to Our Operations

Our success largely depends on the efforts and abilities of our key executive officers. The loss of the services of any of them could materially harm our business because of the cost and time necessary to find a successor. Such a loss would also divert management’s attention away from operational issues. We do not presently maintain key-man life insurance policies on our key executive officers. We also have other key employees who manage our operations and if we were to lose their services, senior management would be required to expend time and energy to find and train their replacements. To the extent that we are smaller than our competitors and have fewer resources, we may not be able to attract sufficient number and quality of staff.

Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 2. Property

Third party contractors produce and ship the products of NDT. Accordingly we do not maintain manufacturing or warehouse space. Our US Corporate facilities are 3,000 square feet of office space located 620 Newport Center Drive Suite 570, Newport Beach, California 92660. NDT occupies the space pursuant to a month to month lease at a rent of $8,000 per month. NDT believes that if it should ever lose or not be able to renew the lease, it would not be difficult to obtain a comparable and satisfactory office location on similar terms. NDT also occupies a lab testing office with 1,000 square feet located at 304 SW 16^th St., Suite 10, Bentonville, AR 72756. NDT occupies the space pursuant to a yearly lease at a rent of $1200 per month. NDT believes that if it should ever lose or not be able to renew the lease, it would not be difficult to obtain a comparable and satisfactory office location.

NDT has offshore facilities located globally as follows:

Newport Digital Technologies, Ltd. with 3,250 square feet of office space located at 12F, No 866-7 Zhongzheng Rd, Zhonghe City, Taipei County, 235, Taiwan, R.O.C., at a rent of $3000 per month, under a lease with a 12 month remaining term.

Newport Digital Technologies, Inc with 500 square feet of office space located at No. 1-21-4, Taihei, Sumida-Ku, Tokyo, 130-0012, Japan, at no rent to the Company.

Newport Digital Technologies, Pty Ltd., with 500 square feet of office space ABN/ACN 57 111 453 500/111 453 500, 104 Auburn Road, Hawthorn 3122 VIC Australia, at no rent to the Company.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company has stipulated to a judgment against the Company in favor of Flair Packaging in the amount of $130,000. The Company and Flair Packaging have not reached a satisfactory agreement on the payment terms.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

OnThere ~~March~~were ~~30,~~no ~~2009,~~matters ~~NDT~~submitted ~~amended its Articles of Incorporation~~ to ~~change~~a ~~the~~vote ~~name~~ of the ~~Company~~share toholders ~~“Newport~~during ~~Digital Technologies, Inc.”, and to increase~~ the ~~number~~fiscal ofyear ~~authorized~~ended ~~shares~~June ~~of Capital stock ($.001 par value) of the Company from 600~~30,~~000,000~~ ~~shares to 1,800,000,000 shares~~2009. These amendments were approved by five shareholders acting by written consent and holding in the aggregate, shares representing more then 50% of the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting of the Company’s shareholders, and by the Company’s Board of Directors.

There were no other matters submitted to a vote of the share holders during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.

Part II

MARKET INFORMATION

The common shares of the Company are listed on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol ~~IFDGE~~NPDT.OB. Following is the high and low sales prices for each of the two years in the period ending June 30, 2009. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

~~UPDATE~~15

Quarter	High	Low
Jul - Sep 2007	.~~013~~0125	.~~0057~~006
Oct - Dec 2007	.010 11	.002
Jan - Mar 2008	.0065	.~~003~~0031
Apr - Jun 2008	.04	.~~0031~~0045
Jul - Sep 2008	.019	.~~004~~0065
Oct - Dec 2008	.~~009~~041	.~~001~~0022
Jan -Mar 2009	.~~016~~0285	.~~0075~~00121
Apr - Jun 2009	.~~048~~018	0.~~026~~005

At ~~October~~June 530, ~~2009~~2010 there were approximately ~~300~~311 record holders of NDT's Common Stock.

NDT has not previously declared or paid any dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that restrict us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

(1) We would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or

(2) Our total assets would be less that the sum of our total liabilities.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company issued a total of 29215,~~000~~601,~~000~~500 restricted shares of its common stock to consultants for business consulting services rendered. The Company also issues a total of 43235,~~750~~950,000 shares of its restricted common stock to a limited number of accredited shareholders for cash, at prices ranging between $0.~~014~~39and ~~and~~ $0.04005 per share. The transactions were deemed transactions exempt from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on section 4(2) of that Act. (See the Company’s reports filed under the Securities And Exchange Act of 1934, which are incorporated herein by reference)

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Not Required.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

THE FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF OUR MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT.

A Note about Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are based on current management's expectations. Statements that are not historical facts are identified as “forward-looking statements”. The words “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “believe,” “plan,” and similar expressions, particularly when used in the “future tense”, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release. These forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates, reflecting the best judgment of senior management that rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events, many of which are outside of NDT’s control, and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements.

These uncertainties, among others, include the success of NDT in obtaining sufficient equity and debt capital on commercially reasonable terms to carry out its business plan, whether advantageous contracts can be negotiated on specific products with NDT’s strategic partners, whether new products will find acceptance in the market place and generate significant sales and profits, the status of US and World economies, and various other factors. No assurance can be given that any of the assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements specified in the following information are accurate, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

The Company is a development stage company, and has yet to realize revenues in its business, which is that of developing, marketing and selling cutting edge technology products and services.

~~NDT~~The ~~formalized~~Company’s ~~its~~initial technology offerings toinclude RFID, ~~Broadband~~handheld ~~that~~readers ~~included~~and ~~Untethered~~RFID ~~Digital~~tags ~~Signage, WiMax~~ and ~~eLearning,~~untethered ~~VOIP~~digital ~~and Security/Surveillance~~signage. ~~NDT~~In early 2009 the Company commenced the development of the N37B, a military rugged handheld mobile computer with a host of options including RFID reader, GPS and 3.5G. ~~This~~The ~~product~~Company ~~will be~~ launched ~~into~~ the ~~market~~product in Q4 of 2009 but because of a long sales cycle, as of June 30, 2010, had not yet shipped any units. ~~NDT~~The Company has signed a distribution agreement with Ingram Micro, one of the largest IT distributors in the world to support sales, marketing and distribution of the N37B product~~. NDT~~ ~~also~~and ~~expects~~is toactively ~~sign~~marketing athrough ~~Distribution~~this ~~Agreement~~sales ~~with~~channel ~~AT&T~~as towell ~~distribute~~as aselling ~~special~~directly ~~version~~to ofend ~~the~~users ~~N37B~~through inthe Q4Company’s ofdirect ~~2009~~sales team. ~~The~~ Additionally, the N37B ~~will also be~~ was submitted to the University of Arkansas (UARK) for handheld testing for consideration in becoming part of WalMart’s RFID POS and Supply Chain solutions in March of 2010 but the Company has no guarantee that it will be used by Wal-Mart.

NDT commenced the development of the N5816 WiMax Fixed Site Base Station which is planned to be launch into the market through Ingram Micro in Q4 2009. NDT commenced marketing studies on VOIP based telecommunications systems and solutions as well as security surveillance video analytics/DVR systems. NDT plans to develop and deliver these products to the market in Q2 2010. 17

NDT opened it Bentonville, AR office to commence hethe development of RFID static lab testing to support RFID solutions for University of Arkansas and Wal-Mart. ~~NDT~~The ~~project~~Company ~~that~~has since decided not to develop the lab, ~~will~~but beto ~~operational~~instead byutilize Q1the ~~2010~~resources ~~providing~~of ~~for-fee~~the ~~testing~~existing ~~and~~RFID ~~consultation~~lab ~~services.~~at The University of Arkansas.

Results of Operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009.

Net Sales: Net sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, was $0.~~00. The prior year’s sales of $1,386,000 were reversed because the product could not be made.~~ Fiscal ~~year~~years 2010 and 2009 ~~was~~were a development ~~year~~years for the company as it charted a new direction in its business model. The Company was focused on developing new relationships and developing new product lines for distribution.

~~Cost~~At ofJune ~~Sales:~~30, ~~The~~2008, ~~Cost~~the Company had an accounts receivable balance totaling $1,386,000 resulting from an international sale of ~~Sales~~technology ~~for~~products. ~~fiscal~~under ~~year~~a ~~ended~~binding ~~June~~contract 30with a fixed price, ~~209~~delivery had been made, and collection was reasonably certain. Subsequently during January, 2009 the buyer backed out of the sale and returned the product to the Company. The Company had related accounts payable to a vendor for the purchase of the technology products. The Company returned the product in full satisfaction of the balance due in the amount of $01,366,095.0 The Company recorded a bad debt in the amount of $19,905 which represented the original net profit on the transaction. The bad debt is included in general and administrative expense at June 30, 2009.

~~Selling~~Cost ~~Expenses~~of Sales: ~~Selling~~The ~~expenses~~Cost ~~for~~of ~~the~~Sales ~~fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 was $0.0 as compared to $297,110~~ for fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2008. As stated above~~2010, ~~the Company~~ was ~~not in the selling phase of its business model in fiscal year ended June 30, 2009~~ $0.

~~Research~~Selling ~~and Development~~ Expenses: ~~R&D~~Selling expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 was $~~733,045~~0 as compared to $0.0 for fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2009. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~As ~~placed~~stated above, the ~~majority~~Company ofwas ~~its~~not ~~efforts~~ in ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~selling ~~ended~~phase ~~June~~of ~~30,~~its ~~2009~~business model in ~~the~~fiscal ~~development~~years 2010 ofand ~~new products~~2009.

15Research and Development Expenses: R&D expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 was $547,929 as compared to $733,045for fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The Company placed the majority of its efforts in both fiscal years ended in the development of new products. General and Administrative expense: General and Administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 was $6,005,844 as compared to $3,296,447 for fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Officer’s Salaries were $1,513,518 in 2009 as a result of incentives to hire professionals to manage the new business environment, but were cut back in 2010 to $383,735. Consulting expenses rose to $4,844,960 in 2010 from $1,713,157 in 2009 as the Company increased its efforts to develop cutting edge technologies and products. Shareholder expenses rose to $830,380 in 2010 from $686,867 in 2009 as the company increased its awareness to the investment community to raise investor capital and to increase awareness regarding its stock to attract new shareholders to its existing base of shareholders.

General and Administrative expense: General and Administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 was $3,296,447 as compared to $1,338,784 for fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. Officers Salaries increased to $1,513,558 as a result of incentives to hire professionals to manage the new business environment. Consulting expenses rose to $972,828 as the Company increased its efforts to develop cutting edge technologies and products. Shareholder expenses rose to $344,665 as the company decided to increase its awareness to the investment community to raise investor capital and to increase awareness regarding its stock to attract new shareholders to its existing base of shareholders.18

Liquidity and Capital Resource: Since its inception, we have financed our cash requirements from cash generated from operations, the sale of equity securities, vendor lines of credit and short-term debt. The Company ~~expects~~is currently attempting to raise ~~an additional~~ $31,000,000 ~~prior to December 31, 2009~~. This new capital is expected to provide ~~the~~additional bridge financing needed in order for the company to ~~become~~reach ~~profitable.~~the point of commercial sales of its products, and then to increase such sales to the point of profitability

Going Concern

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. We had a net loss of approximately $3(6,~~775~~593,~~709for~~233)for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010. We had an accumulated deficit of approximately $15(11,~~261~~485,~~120~~ 411)and noa working capital deficit of $(1,522,395)as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Assurances cannot be given that adequate financing can be obtained to meet our capital needs. If we are unable to generate profits and unable to continue to obtain financing to meet our working capital requirements, we may not be able to implement our business plan, or we may have to curtail our business activities sharply or cease operations altogether. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional financing on reasonable terms, and in the longer term, to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis to retain financing, to obtain additional financing, and, ultimately, to attain profitability. Should any of these events not occur, the accompanying financial statements will be adversely effected and we may have to curtail or cease operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosure in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Results of operations could be impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on these policies.

Material events and uncertainties: We anticipate that we will begin to be profitable ~~during~~in the ~~third~~fourth quarter ~~2009~~of fiscal year 2011, but there is no assurance that this will occur.. For this to happen, we must gain financing and deliver a very successful product.

16While we believe that these statements are accurate, our business is dependent upon general economic conditions and various conditions specific to the technological industry. Accordingly, future trends and results cannot be predicted with certainty.

While we believe that these statements are accurate, our business is dependent upon general economic conditions and various conditions specific to the technological industry.. Accordingly, future trends and results cannot be predicted with certainty.19

Under current operating conditions, management believes that our sources of cash are insufficient to last through the next year. For NDT continue to operate and to grow its sales it will need to raise additional capital and have profitable revenue.

Certain Trends and Uncertainties:

NDT has in the past and may in the future make forward-looking statements. Certain of the statements contained in this document involve risks and uncertainties. The future results of NDT could differ materially from those statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed in this document. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to the following:

NDT relies heavily on the technology expertise of Taiwan’s Institute for Information Industry (III). III is one of the world’s leading information technology institutes, established in 1979. III is sponsored by jointly by the Taiwanese government and private industry. Without III’s involvement, NDT would most likely not be able to become a leader in WIMAX and RFID technologies.

NDT and III have announced their collaboration to develop and deliver an e-learning solution to the America’s and the South Pacific. This solution is the sale of a small notebook computer for children. Under the direction and guidance of NDT and III, ViewSonic Corporation and Quanta have come together to produce a “Lite Bird” computer for distribution and sale through the efforts of NDT. Without the above mentioned companies this project would not be able proceed.

In general the computer, software, and high technology industries are very competitive and new and improved methodologies and technologies always pose a threat to existing operations. At anytime those standards utilized by NDT could become obsolete causing sales to drop in its product lines.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk and Supplementary Data.

Not Required.

Item 8. Financial Statements

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
F/K/A International Food Products Group, Inc.

Financial Statements

June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and

For Each of the Two Years in the Period Ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	8
Financial Statements of Newport Digital Technologies, Inc.
Balance Sheet, June 30, 2009 & 2008	9
Statements of Operations For Each of the Two Years in the Period Ended June 30, 2009	10
Statements of Shareholders' Deficit For Each of the Two Years in the Period Ended June 30, 2009	11
Statements of Cash Flows For Each of the Two Years in the Period Ended June 30, 2009	12
Notes to the Financial Statements	14

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To: THE BOARD OF INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Newport Digital Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a International Food Products Group, Inc.) (a development stage company) as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, and ~~2008~~2009 and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from July 1, 2008 (beginning of development stage) through June 30, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Newport Digital Technologies, Inc. as at June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 and the results of its’ operations and its’ stockholders equity and cash flows for the periods then ended and for the period from July 1, 2008 (beginning of development stage) through June 30, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has difficulties generating sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations and sustain its operations, and has a working capital deficit, that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Gruber & Company, LLC

Gruber & Company, LLC

Saint Louis, Missouri

October 10, ~~2009~~2010

~~F-1~~21

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
F/K/A International Food Products Group, Inc.

(a Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheet

June 30, ~~2009~~2010

	2009		2008
	2010		2009
Current Assets
Cash	$	~~209~~2,~~475~~965	$	1209,~~752~~475
Accounts Receivable		--		1,386,000
Inventory		101,636		--
Prepaid expenses and deposits		~~935~~179,~~000~~448		40935,~~833~~000
Total Current Assets		1284,~~144,475~~049		1,~~428~~144,~~585~~475
Total assets	$	1284,~~144,475~~049	$	1,~~428~~144,~~585~~475
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable	$	~~141~~133,~~282~~334	$	1141,~~572,382~~282
Other accrued expenses		--287,825		~~111,152~~--
Notes payable – related parties		~~417~~1,~~876~~069,240		~~159~~417,~~448~~876
Note payable – third party		50316,~~000~~045		8050,~~500~~000
Total current liabilities		~~609~~1,~~158~~806,444		1609,~~923,482~~158
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred Stock $.001 par value, 16,000,000 authorized and issued @.001 par value		16,000		16,000
Common stock: $.001 par value; 1,800,000,000 shares authorized;
554,718,501and 481,968,501, issued and outstanding		554,719		481,969
1,390,302,001 and 554,718,501, issued and outstanding		1,390,303		554,719
Common stock subscribed		21,~~957~~255,~~500~~274		--2,957,500
Additional paid-in capital		1217,~~268~~670,~~217~~381		1012,~~492~~268,~~545~~217
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(310,~~775~~368,~~709~~942)		--(3,775,709)
Accumulated deficit		(11,485,411)		(11,485,411)
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)		~~535~~(1,~~317~~522,395)		~~(494~~535,~~897)~~317
Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit	$	1284,~~144,475~~049	$	1,~~428~~144,~~585~~475

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

~~F-2~~22

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
F/K/A International Food Products Group, Inc.

(a Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

For Each of the Two Years in the Period Ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

						July 1, 2008
						(inception of
						development
		For the years ended June 30,				stage through
		2009		2008		June 30, 2009
		2010		2009		June 30, 2010
Gross sales	$	--	$	--	$	--
Less: returns, discounts and allowances		--		--		--
Net sales		--		--		--
Cost of goods sold		--		--		--
Gross profit		--		--		--
Selling expenses		--		--		--
Research and development		~~733~~547,~~045~~929		--733,045		~~733~~1,~~045~~280,974
General and administrative expenses		36,~~296~~005,~~447~~844		--3,296,447		39,~~296~~302,~~447~~291
Total operating expenses		46,~~029~~553,~~492~~773		--4,029,492		410,~~029~~583,~~492~~265
Loss from continuing operations		(46,~~029~~553,~~492~~773)		--(4,029,492)		(410,~~029~~583,~~492~~265)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(439,~~965~~460)		(104,~~458~~965)		(444,~~965~~425)
Debt forgiveness		~~258,748~~--		--258,748		258,748
Total other income (expense)		~~253~~(39,~~783~~460)		~~(10~~253,~~458)~~783		~~253~~214,~~783~~323
Loss before provision for income taxes		(36,~~775~~593,~~709~~233)		(103,~~458~~775,709)		(310,~~775~~368,~~709~~942)
Loss from discontinued operations		--		(1,318,879)
Provision for income taxes		--		--		--
Net loss	$	(36,~~775~~593,~~709~~233)	$	(13,~~329~~775,~~337~~709)	$	(310,~~775~~368,~~709~~942)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted:
From continuing operations	$	(0.01)	$	--(0.01)
From discontinued operations		--		(0.00)
Shares used in per-share calculation, basic
and diluted		~~509~~1,151,223,~~980~~126		~~453~~509,~~537~~223,~~501~~980
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

~~F-3~~23

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
F/K/A International Food Products Group, Inc.

(a Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

For Each of the Two Years in the Period Ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

						July 1, 2008
						(inception of
						development
		For the years ended June 30,				stage through
		2009		2008		June 30, 2009)
		2010		2009		June 30, 2010)
Cash flows (used by ) operating activities:	$	~~(3,775,709)~~	$	~~(1,329,337)~~	$	~~(3,775,709)~~
Net loss	$	(6,593,233)	$	(3,775,709)	$	(10,368,942)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used by operating activities
Shares issued for services and debt		~~382~~3,~~250~~213,248		~~545~~382,~~600~~250		~~382~~3,~~250~~595,498
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Accounts receivable		--		(1,386,000)		--
Inventory		(101,636)		--		(101,636)
Prepaid expenses		40755,~~833~~552		~~554~~40,~~143~~833		40796,~~833~~385
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		(457,~~100~~948)		1(45,~~268,024~~100)		(4553,~~100~~048)
Accrued expenses		~~(104~~287,~~275)~~825		~~111~~(104,~~152~~275		~~(104~~183,~~275)~~550
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities		(32,~~502~~446,~~001~~192)		(~~236~~502,~~418~~001)		(315,~~502~~948,~~001~~193)
Cash flows provided by financing activities
Proceeds from related party		~~251~~651,~~552~~364		~~159~~251,~~448~~552		~~251~~902,~~552~~916
Payment on notes payable		(30,500)		--		(30,500)
Proceeds from notes payable		266,045		(30,500)		253,545)
Proceeds from subscribed common stock		21,~~957~~322,~~500~~274		122,~~852~~957,500		1279,~~472,500~~774
Proceeds from sale of common stock		~~531,172~~--		64531,~~000~~172		531,172
Net cash provided by financing activities		32,~~709~~239,~~724~~683		~~236~~3,~~300~~709,724		35,~~709~~949,~~724~~407
Net increase (decrease) in cash		~~207~~(206,~~723~~510)		~~(118)~~207,723		~~207~~1,~~723~~214
Cash at beginning of year		1209,~~752~~475		1,~~870~~752		1,752
Cash at end of year		~~209~~2,~~475~~965		1209,~~752~~475		~~209~~2,~~475~~965
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Interest paid to third parties	$	--	$	--	$	--
Income taxes paid		--		--		--
Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash investing and financing Activities
Issuance of common shares for prepaid services	$	~~935,000~~	$	--935,000	$	935,000
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

~~F-4~~24

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ~~F/K/A International Food Products Group, Inc.~~

F/K/A International Food Products Group, Inc.

(a Development Stage Company)

Statement of Shareholders’ Deficit

								Deficit						~~Deficit~~
								Accumulated						~~Accumulated~~
					Common	Additional		~~Common~~During		~~Additional~~				~~During~~
	Preferred stock		Common stock	~~Common stock~~	Common Stock	Paid-in	Accumulated	~~Stock~~Development		~~Paid-in~~		~~Accumulated~~		~~Development~~
	Shares	Amount	~~Amount~~Shares	~~Shares~~Amount	Subscribed	~~Amount~~Capital	Deficit	~~Subscribed~~Stage	Total	~~Capital~~		~~Deficit~~		~~Stage~~		~~Total~~
Balance, June 30, 2007	--	$	--	414,363,501	$	414,364	$	--	$	9,966,550	$	(10,156,074)	$	--	$	224,840
		$		$		$	$	$	$
Shares issued for cash	--		--	8,405,000		8,405		--		55,595				--		64,000
	--	--	414,363,501	414,364	--	9,966,550	-10,156,074	--	224,840
Shares issued for services	--		--	59,200,000		59,200		--		406,400				--		465,600
Balance, June 30, 2007
Preferred stock issued	16,000,000		16,000							64,000						80,000
Shares issued for cash		--	8,405,000	8,405	--	55,595		--	64,000
Net loss for the year	--		--	--		--		--		--		(1,329,337)		--		(1,329,337)
Shares issued for cash		--	59,200,000	59,200	--	406,400		--	465,600
Balance, June 30, 2008	16,000,000		16,000	481,968,501		481,969		--		10,492,545		(11,485,411)		--		(494,897)
Preferred stock issued	16,000,000	16,000				64,000			80,000
Shares issued for cash				29,000,000		29,000				502,172						531,172
Net loss for the year	--	--	--	--	--	--	-1,329,337	--	-1,329,337
Shares issued for services				43,750,000		43,750				1,273,500						1,317,250
Balance, June 30, 2008	16,000,000	16,000	481,968,501	481,969	--	10,492,545	-11,485,411	--	-494,897
Cash received for stock subscription								2,957,500								2,957,500
Shares issued for cash			29,000,000	29,000		502,172			531,172
Net loss for the year	--		--	--		--		--		--		--		(3,775,709)		(3,775,709)
Shares issued for services			43,750,000	43,750		1,273,500			1,317,250
Balance, June 30, 2009	16,000,000	$	16,000	554,718,501	$	554,719	$	2,957,500	$	12,268,217	$	(11,485,411)	$	(3,775,709)	$	535,317
Cash received for stock subscription					2,957,500				2,957,500
Net loss for the year	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	-3,775,709	-3,775,709
Balance, June 30, 2009	16,000,000	16,000	554,718,501	554,719	2,957,500	12,268,217	-11,485,411	-3,775,709	535,317
Shares issued for services			325,782,000	325,782		2,887,466			3,213,248
Cash received for stock subscription					1,322,274				1,322,274
Shares issued for subscriptions received			509,801,500	509,802	(3,024,500)	2,514,698
Net loss for the year								(6,593,233)	(6,593,233)
Balance, June 30, 2010	16,000,000	16,000	1,390,302,001	1,390,303	1,255,274	17,670,381	(11,485,411)	(10,368,942)	(1,522,395)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

~~F-5~~25

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
F/K/A International Food Products Group, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and

For Each of the Two Years in the Period Ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Company Overview

On March 30, 2009 a Special Meeting of the Company’s shareholders was held and a majority vote of shareholders approved a name change of the Company to Newport Digital Technologies, Inc. In addition, the number of authorized shares of the Company’s $.001 par value common stock was increased from 600,000,000 shares to 1,800,000,000 shares.

~~par~~The ~~value~~Company ~~common~~during ~~stock~~the ~~was~~past ~~increased~~two ~~from~~years ~~600~~has continued to broaden its scope of business,~~000~~ leaving the food processing business behind,~~000~~ ~~shares~~and devoting all of its resources and attention to 1developing a technology marketing and distribution business. As a result,~~800~~ it should be considered a development stage company,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~and has yet to realize revenues in its redirected business.

The Company during the past year has continued to broaden its scope of business, leaving the food processing business behind, and devoting all of its resources and attention to developing a technology marketing and distribution business. As a result, it should be considered a development stage company, and has yet to realize revenues in its redirected business.

Revenue Recognition

~~Product~~The ~~revenues~~Company ~~are~~recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition. SAB No. 104 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized. (1) ~~upon~~persuasive ~~shipment~~evidence toof an arrangement exists; (2) title has transferred; (3) the ~~customers.~~fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related revenues are recorded.

Cash

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

The Company has no requirement for compensating balances.

Trade Accounts Receivable

The Company intends and has the ability to hold trade accounts receivable until they are paid. Trade accounts receivable are reported at their outstanding principal amount less any chargeoffs and an allowance for doubtful accounts. When a trade account receivable is deemed uncollectible, the balance is charged off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company's historical loss experience. Recoveries of trade accounts receivable that have been previously charged off are recorded when received as a reduction in bad debt expense in the year of collection. The Company determines trade accounts receivable delinquency based on contractual terms of the specific trade account receivable. The Company's policy for determining past due is 60 days past agreed upon payment terms. As of June 30, ~~2008~~2010, the Company ~~had~~has ~~one~~no ~~customer and did no8 establish an allowance for doubtful~~ accounts receivable.

~~F-6~~At June 30, 2008, the Company had an accounts receivable balance totaling $1,386,000 resulting from an international sale of technology products. under a binding contract with a fixed price, delivery had been made, and collection was reasonably certain. Subsequently during January, 2009 the buyer backed out of the sale and returned the product to the Company. The Company had related accounts payable to a vendor for the purchase of the technology products. The Company returned the product in full satisfaction of the balance due in the amount of $1,366,095. The Company recorded a bad debt in the amount of $19,905 which represented the original net profit on the transaction. The bad debt is included in general and administrative expense at June 30, 2009.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Market is defined as sales price less cost to dispose and a normal profit margin. Inventory consists of finished products.

Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses represent expenses paid prior to the receipt of the related goods or services and consist primarily of prepaid ~~rent and~~ legal fees.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses for new products are expensed as they are incurred. Expenses for new product development totaled $~~733~~547,~~045~~929 for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and $~~-0-~~733,045 for the year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2009.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 825, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 107: Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments , requires management to disclose the estimated fair value of certain assets and liabilities defined ~~by SFAS No. 107~~ as financial instruments. Financial instruments are generally defined by ~~SFAS No. 107~~ as cash and cash equivalents, evidence of ownership interest in equity, or a contractual obligation that both conveys to one entity a right to receive cash or other financial instruments from another entity and imposes on the other entity the obligation to deliver cash or other financial instruments to the first entity.

orAt aJune ~~contractual~~30, ~~obligation~~2010 ~~that~~and ~~both~~2009, ~~conveys~~the toCompany’s ~~one~~financial ~~entity~~instruments aare ~~right~~cash toand ~~receive~~ cash orequivalents, ~~other~~accounts ~~financial~~payable-trade, ~~instruments~~accrued ~~from~~liabilities ~~another~~and ~~entity~~notes payable. The recorded values of cash and ~~imposes~~cash onequivalents ~~the~~and ~~other~~accounts ~~entity~~payable ~~the~~and ~~obligation~~accrued toliabilities ~~deliver~~approximate ~~cash~~their orfair ~~other~~values ~~financial~~based ~~instruments~~on totheir short-term nature. The recorded value of the ~~first~~notes ~~entity~~payable approximates the fair value, as interest approximates market rates.

At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s financial instruments are cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable-trade, accrued liabilities and notes payable. The recorded values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. The recorded value of the notes payable approximates the fair value, as interest approximates market rates.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) represents the change during the reporting period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. Deferred tax assets and/or liabilities are classified as current and noncurrent based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting purposes, or based on the expected reversal date for deferred taxes that are not related to an asset or liability. Deferred tax assets include tax loss and credit ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards and are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company currently has net operating loss ("NOL") ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards that can be utilized to offset future income for federal and state tax purposes. The NOL's generate a significant deferred tax asset. However, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance against this deferred tax asset as it has been determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will not generate future income that the NOL's could offset.

Stock~~-based~~ ~~compensation~~Based Compensation

InWe ~~December~~account ~~2004,~~for ~~the~~stock-based ~~Financial~~compensation ~~Accounting~~in ~~Standards~~accordance ~~Board~~with (FASB) ~~issued~~ASC ~~SFAS No. 123(R)~~718, ~~Share-Based~~Compensation ~~Payment.~~– ~~This pronouncement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for~~ Stock~~-Based~~ Compensation, ~~and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R)~~ which requires that companies account for awards of equity instruments issued to employees under the fair value method of accounting and recognize such amounts in their statements of operations. Under ~~SFAS~~FASB ~~No.~~ASC ~~123(R),~~718 we are required to measure compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognize compensation expense in our consolidated statements of operations over the service period that the awards are expected to vest.

~~F-7~~27

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ~~SFAS~~FASB ~~123(R)~~ASC ~~and~~718 ~~the Emerging Issues Task Force consensus in Issue No. 96-18 ("EITF 96-18")~~, "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services". ~~Common~~If ~~stock~~the fair value of goods or services received in a share-based payment transaction with nonemployees is more reliably measurable than the fair value of the equity instruments issued, the fair value of the goods or services received shall be used to ~~non-employees~~measure the transaction. In contrast, if the fair value of the equity instruments issued in ~~exchange~~a ~~for~~share-based ~~services~~payment transaction with nonemployees is ~~accounted~~more ~~for~~reliably measurable than the fair value of the consideration received, the transaction shall be measured based on the fair value of the ~~services~~equity ~~received~~instruments issued.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. There were no advertising costs during ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009.

Interest Expense

Interest expense, including loan fees paid through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, relate to borrowings, the proceeds of which were used to acquire ~~products~~inventory ~~sold~~and topay ~~others~~operating expenses.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. The most significant assumption that has been made by management with regards to the preparation of their financial statements is the valuation allowance that has been established for the deferred income tax asset and the valuation of share-based compensation. Changes in this and other estimates as well as the assumptions involved in the preparation of the financial statements are considered reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the financial statement

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (~~Recently~~Topic ~~adopted~~855); Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, effective upon issuance, which removed the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements.

In ~~September~~June ~~2006~~2009, the FASB issued ~~Statement~~the ~~of Financial~~ Accounting ~~Standard~~Standards ~~(“SFAS”)~~Codification ~~No. 157, Fair Value Measurements~~ (“~~SFAS~~FASB ~~No. 157~~ASC”). ~~The~~as ~~standard defines fair value, outlines a framework for measuring fair value, and details~~ the ~~required~~sole ~~disclosures~~source about fair value measurements. The standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 (our fiscal 2009). In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-1, Application of ~~FASB~~authoritative ~~Statement No~~U. ~~157 to FASB Statement No~~S. 13generally ~~and~~accepted ~~Other~~accounting ~~Accounting~~principles ~~Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13~~ (~~“FSP 157-1”~~GAAP) ~~and~~recognized ~~157-2,~~by ~~Effective~~the ~~Date of~~ FASB ~~Statement No. 157 (“FSP 157-2”). FSP157-1 amends SFAS No. 157~~ to ~~exclude~~be ~~FASB~~applied ~~Statement~~by ~~No.~~nongovernmental ~~13,~~entities ~~Accounting~~in ~~for Leases, and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements of leases from~~ the ~~provisions~~preparation of ~~SFAS~~financial ~~No.~~statements, ~~157. FSP 157-2 delays the~~ effective ~~date of SFAS No. 157~~ for ~~most~~interim ~~nonfinancial assets~~ and ~~nonfinancial~~annual ~~liabilities~~periods toending ~~fiscal years beginning~~ after ~~November~~ September 15, ~~2008~~2009. ~~(our~~FASB ~~fiscal~~ASC ~~2010). As~~does anot ~~result~~change GAAP, ~~the~~but ~~application~~changes of the ~~definition~~way ofaccounting ~~fair~~principles ~~value~~are ~~and~~referenced ~~related~~in ~~disclosures~~financial ofstatements ~~SFAS~~and ~~No. 157~~notes ~~(as~~to ~~impacted~~financial ~~by these FSPs) was effective for our Company beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2009~~statements. ~~This~~ ~~adoption~~As ~~did~~required, ~~not~~we ~~have~~adopted aFASB ~~material~~ASC ~~impact~~in ~~on our results of operations or financial condition for~~ the first quarter of ~~our~~ fiscal ~~2009. We~~2010 ~~have~~and, ~~not~~other ~~completed~~than ~~our~~accounting ~~evaluation~~principle ofresource ~~the potential impact~~referencing, ifFASB ~~any,~~ASC ~~from~~had ~~the~~no ~~remaining~~impact ~~aspects of SFAS No. 157 for which the effective date was deferred under FSP 157-2,~~ on our ~~consolidated~~ financial ~~position,~~statements ~~results~~as of ~~operations~~ and ~~cash~~for ~~flows. On October 10, 2008,~~ the ~~FASB~~years ~~issued~~ended ~~FSP 157-3, Fair Value Measurements (“FSP 157-3”), which clarifies the application of SFAS No.~~June 157 in an inactive market and provides an example to demonstrate how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance30, ~~including prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued~~2010. ~~The adoption of this standard as of October 25, 2008 did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial positions.~~

FIn December 2007, the FASB issued changes in accounting requirements for business combinations that are contained in FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (“FASB ASC 805”). The requirements retain the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but require a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized in purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-8process research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. The above provisions for changes in accounting requirements prescribed by FASB ASC 805, effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009, were adopted in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 with no impact on our financial statements as of and for the years ended June 30, 2010.

~~In February 2007, the~~ FASB ~~issued~~ASC ~~SFAS No. 159~~820, ~~The~~ Fair Value ~~Option~~Measurements ~~for Financial Assets~~ and ~~Financial~~Disclosures ~~Liabilities~~ (“~~SFAS~~FASB ~~No.~~ASC ~~159~~820”)~~. SFAS~~ ~~No. 159~~includes ~~permits~~guidance anthat ~~entity~~establishes toa ~~choose,~~standard atdefinition ~~specified~~of ~~election~~fair ~~dates,~~value ~~to measure eligible financial instruments~~ and ~~certain~~a ~~other~~framework ~~items~~under atgenerally ~~fair~~accepted ~~value~~accounting ~~that~~principles ~~are not currently required~~ to bemeasure ~~measured at~~ fair value. ~~An entity reports unrealized gains~~ and ~~losses~~expands ondisclosure ~~items~~requirements for ~~which the~~ fair value ~~option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date~~measurements. ~~Upfront~~ ~~costs~~On ~~and~~July 1, ~~fees~~2008, ~~related~~we toadopted ~~items for which~~ the ~~fair~~provisions ~~value~~of ~~option~~FASB isASC ~~elected~~820 are recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred. SFAS No. 159 also established presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for ~~similar types of~~ assets and liabilities~~. As~~ ameasured ~~result,~~or ~~the~~disclosed ~~application~~at ~~of the~~ fair value ~~option~~on ~~for~~a ~~financial~~recurring ~~assets and financial liabilities of SFAS No~~basis. ~~159~~The ~~was~~provisions ~~effective for our Company beginning with the first quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~FASB ~~2009. At~~ASC ~~the~~820 ~~effective~~were ~~date,~~adopted ~~an entity could elect the fair value option~~ for ~~eligible~~nonfinancial ~~items~~assets ~~that existed at that date~~ and isliabilities ~~required~~measured toon ~~report the effect of the first remeasurement to fair value as~~ a ~~cumulative~~non-~~effect~~recurring ~~adjustment~~basis toon ~~the~~July 1, ~~opening~~2009 ~~balance~~and ofhad ~~retained~~no ~~earnings.~~impact Weon ~~chose not to elect the fair value option for~~ our financial ~~assets~~statements ~~and~~at ~~liabilities existing on July~~ June 30, ~~2008~~2010, ~~and~~as ~~did~~we ~~not~~currently ~~elect~~have ~~the~~no ~~fair~~nonfinancial ~~value option for any financial~~ assets and liabilities ~~transacted~~measured ~~during~~on ~~the~~a ~~twelve~~non-recurring ~~months~~basis ~~ended~~at ~~July~~fair ~~30, 2009~~value.

In ~~April 2009~~June 2008, the FASB issued ~~FSP~~revisions ~~No. FAS 157-4,~~to ~~Determining~~FASB ~~Fair~~ASC ~~Value~~260, ~~When~~Earnings ~~the~~Per ~~Volume~~Share ~~and~~(“FASB ~~Level~~ASC of260”) ~~Activity~~that ~~for~~prescribe ~~the~~guidelines ~~Asset~~on ordetermining ~~Liability~~whether ~~Have~~instruments ~~Significantly~~granted ~~Decreased~~in ~~and~~share-based ~~Identifying~~payment ~~Transactions~~transactions ~~That~~are ~~Are~~participating ~~Not~~securities ~~Orderly~~prior ~~(“FSP~~to ~~FAS 157-4”). This~~vesting ~~FSP~~and, ~~clarifies~~therefore, ~~the~~need ~~application~~to ofbe ~~SFAS No.~~included ~~157~~in ~~when~~the ~~there~~earnings isallocation noin ~~active~~computing ~~market~~earnings orper ~~where~~share. Further, the ~~price~~revisions ~~inputs~~clarify ~~being~~that ~~used~~unvested ~~represent~~share-based ~~distressed~~payment ~~sales. Additional~~awards ~~guidance~~that iscontain ~~provided~~non-forfeitable ~~regarding~~rights ~~estimating~~to ~~the~~dividends ~~fair~~or ~~value~~dividend ofequivalents an(whether ~~asset~~paid or ~~liability (financial and nonfinancial~~unpaid) ~~when~~are ~~the~~participating ~~volume~~securities and ~~level~~shall ofbe ~~activity~~included ~~for~~in the ~~asset~~computation orof ~~liability~~earnings ~~have~~per ~~significantly~~share ~~decreased~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~identifying~~the ~~transactions~~two ~~that~~class ~~are not orderly~~method. ~~FSP~~As ~~FAS~~required, ~~157-4~~we isadopted ~~effective~~these ~~for~~revisions ~~interim~~to ~~and~~FASB ~~annual~~ASC ~~periods~~260 ~~ending~~effective ~~after June~~July 151, 2009. ~~The~~ ~~adoption of SFAS 157-4 did not impact our results of operations, cash flows or financial positions.~~

InWe ~~April~~have ~~2009,~~determined ~~the~~that ~~FASB~~all issued FSP No. FAS 115-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FSP FAS 115-2”). This FSP provides additional guidance to provide greater clarity about the credit and noncredit component of an other~~-than-temporary~~ ~~impairment~~recently ~~event~~issued ~~and~~accounting tostandards ~~more effectively communicate when an other-than-temporary impairment event has occurred. This FSP applies to debt securities. FSP FAS 115-2~~ will benot ~~effective~~have ~~for~~a ~~interim~~material ~~and~~impact ~~annual~~on ~~periods~~our ~~ending~~consolidated ~~after~~financial ~~June 15~~statements, ~~2009. The~~or ~~adoption~~do ~~of FSP FAS 115-2 did~~ not ~~impact~~apply to our ~~results of~~ operations~~, cash flows or financial positions~~.

~~In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB~~ 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in all interim financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not impact our results of operations, cash flows or financial positions.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”). SFAS No. 165 was issued in order to establish principles and requirements for reviewing and reporting subsequent events and requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events are evaluated and whether the date corresponds with the time at which the financial statements were available for issue (as defined) or were issued. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not impact our results of operations, cash flows or financial positions. We have evaluated events and transactions that occurred after July 30, 2009 through October 7, 2009, the date we issued these financial statements. During this period, we did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141R”), which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141R was issued to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 141R-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (“FSP 141 R-1”). FSP 141 R-1 was issued to deal with the initial recognition and measurement of an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency provided the asset or liability’s fair value on the date of acquisition can be determined. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (our fiscal 2010).

F-9

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No.160 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (our fiscal 2010). The adoption of SFAS No. 160 will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 (our fiscal 2010), with early application encouraged. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”). The objective of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141R, and other generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). FSP 142-3 applies to all intangible assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise, and shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (our fiscal 2010), and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. We are in the process of evaluating FSP 142-3 and do not expect it to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“SFAS No. 166”) . SFAS No. 166 improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets, the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows, and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. Additionally, SFAS No. 166 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from Statement 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, and removes the exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, to qualifying special-purpose entities. SFAS No. 166 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009 (our fiscal 2011). We have not completed our evaluation of the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on our financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”). This statement amends Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009 (our fiscal 2011). Earlier application is prohibited. We have not completed our evaluation of the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on our financial statements.

F-10

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS No. 168”). SFAS No. 168 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. With limited exceptions, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 168 will be effective in the first quarter of fiscal

2. Equipment

Equipment consisted of the following as of June 30, 2009:
Equipment consisted of the following as of June 30, 2010:
Computer equipment	$	35,090
Computer Equipment	$	35,090
Furniture and fixtures		2,424
		37,514
Less: accumulated depreciation		(37,514	)
Total equipment		-

Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 was $0. Equipment was fully depreciated at June 30, 2006.

3. Accounts Payable

Included in Accounts Payable is a payable to a vendor of the Company who supplied packaging for the Company's products during the period from fiscal year 2000 through fiscal year 2002 and obtained a judgment in the California Superior Court against the Company for the amounts due for the products that were provided and court-awarded attorney’s fees. This judgment awarded by the court to the vendor has been recorded, and a lien has been filed in the approximate amount of $130,000.

4. Notes Payable

Note payable to related party who is an officer, director and major shareholder; the note is uncollateralized with interest. @ 10% due on demand, including interest	$	~~417~~1,~~876~~069,240
Note payable to a third party, uncollateralized with interest @10% due on demand, including interest	$	50,000
Note payable to an individual dated November 1, 2009, uncollateralized with interest due at 5% per month with a maturity date of October 31, 2011. The note may be converted to common stock at a later date agreeable to by both borrower and lender.		25,000
Note payable to an individual dated November 1, 2009, uncollateralized with interest due at 5% per month with a maturity date of October 31, 2012. The note may be converted to common stock at a later date agreeable to by both borrower and lender.		2,295
Note payable to an individual dated November 10, 2009, uncollateralized with interest due at 5% per month with a maturity date of November 11, 2011. The note may be converted to common stock at a later date agreeable to by both borrower and lender.		113,750
Note payable to an individual dated December 24, 2009, uncollateralized with interest due at 5% per month with a maturity date of December 23, 2011. The note may be converted to common stock at a later date agreeable to by both borrower and lender.		125,000
	$	316,045

~~F-11~~29

5. Deferred Income Taxes

The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
	2010		2009
Current tax expense:
Federal		--		-
State		--		-
		--		-
Deferred tax expense:
Federal				-
State		--		-
-		--
Total provision	$	--	$	-

Significant components of the Company's deferred income tax assets and liabilities at June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 are as follows:

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
	2010		2009
Deferred income tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forward	$	46,~~273~~119,~~113~~219	$	34,~~301~~273,~~684~~113
Allowance and reserves		--		-
Other		--		-
Total deferred income tax asset		46,~~273~~119,~~113~~219		34,~~301~~273,~~684~~113)
Valuation allowance		-4(6,~~273~~119,~~113~~219)		(34,~~301~~273,~~684~~113)
Net deferred income tax asset		-		-

The Company, based upon its history of losses and management's assessment of when operations are anticipated to generate taxable income, has concluded that it is more likely than not that none of the net deferred income tax assets will be realized through future taxable earnings and has established a valuation allowance for them.

Reconciliation of the effective tax rate to the U.S. statutory rate is as follows:

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate		(34.0)	%		(34.0.)	%
State tax provision		-			-
Other					-
Stock-based compensation		16.86			2916.98
Change in valuation allowance		17.24			417.02
Effective income tax rate		--	%		0.10	%

The Company also has federal and state net operating loss ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards of approximately $1521,~~000~~854,000. The federal net operating loss ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards will begin to expire in the years 2018.

~~F-12~~30

6. Commitments

The Company rents its corporate office on a month to month basis.

7. Going Concern -

The Company has incurred net losses for the year of $36,~~775~~593,~~709~~233, and has a retained deficit of $1521,~~261~~854,~~119~~353, is in the development stage, and has no revenues. Our business plan calls for development, marketing and sale of cutting edge technology based products and services, developed based on the technology of our strategic partners. If we are unable negotiate favorable contracts for such technology with our partners, or if the products and services we choose to develop and market are not favorably received in the market place and do not generate significant sales and revenues at reasonable profit margins to us, we will not be able to generate enough revenue to achieve and maintain profitability or to continue our operations.. No assurances can be given that the Company will be able to raise the capital required to implement its business plan.. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the company is unable to continue as a going concern.

8. Share-Based Compensation

In prior years, the Company granted options to its officers and certain consultants. No options were granted during either of the two years in the period ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010. The Company does not have a formal plan for granting options.

Stock options granted and outstanding at June 30, ~~2009~~2010. There were no changes during the years then ended June 30, ~~2000~~2010 and ~~2008~~ 2009. All options granted are fully vested at June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and are exercisable, upon proper notice, in whole or in part at any time. The options granted have contractual lives ranging from ten to sixteen years.

~~F-13~~Summary information about the Company's options outstanding all of which are exercisable at June 30, 2010:

Summary information about the Company's options outstanding all of which are exercisable at June 30, 2009:



			Weighted Average
	Shares		Exercise Price
Balance, June 30, 2007		16,650,000	$	0.133
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Canceled		-		-
Balance, June 30, 2008		16,650,000		0.133
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Canceled		-		-
Balance, June 30, 2009 and 2010		16,650,000	$	0.133
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 and 2009		16,650,000	$	0.133

Summary information about the Company's options outstanding all of which are exercisable at June 30, 2010:

			Weighted Average
	Shares		Exercise Price
Balance, June 30, 2007		16,650,000	$	0.133
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Canceled		-		-
Balance, June 30, 2008		16,650,000		0.133
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Canceled		-		-
Balance, June 30, 2009		16,650,000	$	0.133
Exercisable at June 30, 2008		16,650,000	$	0.133
Exercisable at June 30, 2009		16,650,000	$	0.133
Summary information about the Company's options outstanding all of which are exercisable at June 30, 2009:


Stock Options Outstanding

		Weighted Average
Average Option		Remaining	Average
Exercise	Number	Contractual	Exercise
Price	Outstanding	Life	Price
$0.08	11,250,000	3.5	0.083
$0.25	5,400,000	6.2	0.25
	16,650,000	4.4	0.133

The Company issues shares of its common stock to non -employees in payment for services provided, and issued shares to employees in satisfaction of accrued compensation. ~~The~~If ~~Company~~the ~~records~~fair value of goods or services received in a share-based payment transaction with nonemployees is more reliably measurable than the fair value of the ~~shares~~equity instruments issued, the fair value of the goods or services received shall be used to measure the ~~cost~~transaction. In contrast, if the fair value of the ~~transactions~~equity instruments issued in a share-based payment transaction with ~~both~~nonemployees ~~non~~is ~~employees~~more ~~and~~reliably ~~employees.~~measurable ~~The~~than ~~Company~~the ~~does~~fair ~~not~~value ~~have~~of athe ~~formal~~consideration ~~share~~received, the transaction shall be measured based ~~compensation~~on ~~plan~~the fair value of the equity instruments issued.

F The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur in accordance with guidance of section 505-1450-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

The fair value of unrestricted shares is determined by the quoted market price at the measurement date of each issuance. The fair value of restricted shares is estimated at the measurement date of each issuance using the Black-Scholes Option Model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the measurement date.31

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Volatility	360%		175% to 736%
Expected dividends
Risk-free rate	2.66% to3.87%		2.18% to 3.66%
Expected life of the options	1.0 to 2.0 years		1.0 to 2.0 years
A summary of share activity follows.
	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Shares issued to non employees for services:
Number of shares issued		33,750,000		59,200,000
Estimated fair value	$	1,267,250	$	465,600-
Shares issued to employees in satisfaction of accrued payroll:
Number of shares issued - Common		10,000,000		-
Number of shares issued - Preferred		-		16,000,000
Estimated fair value – Common	$	50,000	$	-
Estimated fair value – Preferred	$	-	$	80,000

9. Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted loss per common share ~~have~~has been computed by dividing the loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares.

The computations of basic and diluted loss per common share are as follows:

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
	2010		2009
Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
Numerator:
Net loss available to common shareholders	$	3(6,~~775~~593,~~709~~233)	$	(13,~~329~~775,~~337~~709)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares - basic and diluted		~~509~~1,151,223,~~980~~126		~~453~~509,~~547~~223,~~501~~980
Loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.0001)	$	(0.0001)

F-15

The effect of the potentially dilutive securities listed below was not included in the computation of diluted loss per share, because to do so would have been antidilutive for the two years presented.

Common shares reserved for future issuance are as follows:

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2009	2008
	2010	2009
Shares of common stock issuable under:
Employee stock options	15,150,000	15,150,000
Nonemployee stock options	1,500,000	1,500,000
Total shares of common stock issuable	16,650,000	16,650,000

10. ~~Discontinued~~Stock ~~Operations~~Transactions

~~The~~During the year ended June 30, 2010 the Company ~~has~~issued ~~discontinued~~565,782,000 shares of its ~~previous~~common ~~business~~stock ~~plan~~to ~~that~~consultants ~~was~~for inservices ~~effect~~valued inat $3,213,248. In addition during the year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2009, ~~and~~the ~~has~~Company ~~reported~~received ~~those~~cash ~~operations~~proceeds astotaling ~~discontinued~~$1,322,274 ~~operations~~for oncommon ~~the~~stock ~~statement of operations~~subscriptions.

11During the year ended June 30, 2009 the Company issued 565,782,000 shares of its common stock to consultants for services valued at $1,317,250 and 29,000,000 shares for cash proceeds of $531,172. ~~Stock~~ ~~Transactions~~In addition during the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received cash proceeds totaling $2,957,500 for common stock subscriptions.

During the year ended June 30, 2009 the Company issued 59,200,000 shares of its common stock to consultants for services valued at $1,317,250 and 29,000,000 shares for cash proceeds of $531,172. In addition during the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received cash proceeds totaling $2,957,500 for common stock subscriptions.

During the year ended June 30, 2008 the Company issued 67,605,000 shares of its common stock, 59,200,000 to consultants for services, and 8,405,000 for cash of $64,000 The shares were valued at their value at the date of issuance. The Company also issued 16,000,000 preferred shares to its President , a related party for accrued salary of $80,000.

12. Related Party Transactions

Note payable to related party who is an officer, director and major shareholder; the note is uncollateralized with interest at 10% due on demand, including interest. The note payable balance was $~~417~~1,~~876~~069,240 and $~~159~~417,~~448~~876 at June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 respectively.

During the year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2010 the Company issued 16120,~~000~~732,000 ~~preferred~~common shares to anit’s ~~officer,~~board ~~director~~of ~~and~~directors ~~major~~as ~~shareholder~~compensation for ~~accrued~~services ~~salary~~rendered. The ~~preferred~~ common shares were valued at $802,~~000~~414,640.

~~F-16~~32

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to be effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “ SEC”), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives. Also, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.9

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, ~~2008~~2009 to cause the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Evaluation of and Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The ~~management~~Management of ~~International~~Newport ~~Food~~Digital ~~Products~~Technologies, ~~Group~~Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:



	−	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

	−	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

	−	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

18Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the requisite evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions with NPDT for each of the directors and officers of NPDT.

Name	Age Position (1)
Richard Damion	6667
Chairman, CEO, CFO, Secretary, Treasurer and Director since 1996
Robert George, Director since 2001	7475
Michael Lutton, President, Director since 2009	52
Michael Lutton, Vice Chairman , Director since 2009	53
Gary DeMel, CEO since 2009	52
Donald Danks, CEO since 2010	53
Wei Ling (Spelling), COO and CTO since 2009	52
Weiling Tsao, President since 2010	53

(1) All executive officers are elected by the Board and hold office until the next Annual Meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and agree to serve.

Richard Damion has been chairman of NDT since it began operations in 1996. From 1992 through 1996 he was the president and CEO of Pacific Snax Corporation, a snack food company where he was in charge of general operations and product

~~development~~Development.

Robert George has been a director of the Company since August 2001. He was owner and operator of RGA, Inc., at one time the largest Health Food Brokerage Company in America which he sold after 18 years. In 1999 he came out of retirement to become the Vice President of Sales and part owner of Dr Soy Nutrition, an Energy bar company that has Distribution in over 12,000 outlets in the U.S. including Wal-Mart, Sam’s Clubs and all U.S. Military Commissaries to name a few.

Michael T. Lutton, age 5253, has a long and varied business career dealing with global banks and investors. Mr. Lutton served as President of both The Irvine Industrial Company and the Irvine Office Company, subsidiaries of the Irvine Company, Orange County, California, from 1984 to 1993. In this position, he was responsible for the development of commercial buildings, leasing and sales of commercial buildings, and asset management for the companies. These subsidiaries were responsible for all development and asset management of The Irvine Company's "on and off ranch" portfolios. Mr. Lutton served as Chairman and CEO of PM Realty Group, a large asset management company, holding that position from 1993 to 2000. PM Realty Group was engaged in leasing, selling and asset and property management of large commercial buildings and properties.. From 2001 to the present, Mr. Lutton has served as a Managing Member of Centurion Partners, a Company engaged in real estate development. In this position Mr. Lutton oversaw the acquisition and development of the 33 story Sapphire Tower Condominium Project in downtown San Diego. Mr. Lutton has a Bachelor of Science from the University of Southern California.

Donald Danks, age 53, is the CEO of the company. Previously, from January 2001 November 2008 Mr. Danks was the CEO for iMergent, Inc., an e-commerce software and services company listed on the American Stock Exchange. Prior to and after his position at iMergent, Mr. Danks was and has been involved in the creation, funding and business development of several early-stage companies. His activities included attracting early stage capital, assisting in the development of business plans, recruitment of senior management, building institutional ownership and overseeing ongoing corporate finance needs. Mr. Danks has a B.S. from U.C.L.A.

Mr. DeMel, age 52, is a twenty-eight year veteran of the semiconductor and high-tech industries, has held several senior management positions within Intel Corp., ATI Inc., and Level One Communications, Inc. and is well know worldwide in leadership circles involved in the development, manufacture and sale of products utilizing wireless, computing, networking, gaming and graphic technologies. 34

Mr. DeMel was President and a director for Micro Imaging Technologies, Inc., a company engaged in developing a laser-based, rapid microbial identification technology business, from January of 2007 to June of 2009. From June 2007, through June of 2008, Mr. DeMel was CEO and President of Earth First Industries, Inc. a company in the business of developing, marketing and distributing the first environmental friendly packaging materials patented from his IP. Mr. DeMel continues to serve as CEO of Environmental Synergy, Inc. Since March 2004, Mr. DeMel has formed ESL and has developed and marketed some of the most leading edge technologies in the wireless, medical and alterative energy markets, while Mr. DeMel continues to drive further advancement in semiconductor development and with associated breakthroughs in software worldwide.

None of our four directors is considered an independent director. The definition the Company uses to determine whether a director is independent is NASDAQ Rule 4200(a)(15).

Section 16(A). Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The following persons have failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year:

Name and principal position	Number of late reports	Transactions not timely reported	Known failures to file a required form
Richard Damion CEO	0	0	0
Richard Damion CFO	0	0	0
Robert George, Director	0	0	0
Donald Danks CEO	0	0	0
Mike Lutton VCOB	0	0	0
Weiling Tsao PRES	0	0	0

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth certain information as to our officers and directors.

Summary Compensation Table
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Total ($)
Richard Damion, COB, CFO	2007	0	0	0
	2008	150,000	80,000	230,000
	2009	0	660,000	660,000
Joseph R. Rodriguez, Jr., Former CFO	2007	0	0	0
	2008	65,000	50,000	115,000
	2009	0	0	0
Robert George, Director	2007	25,000	3,000	28,000
	2008	25,000	25,000	50,000
	2009	14,272	25,000	34,272
Ketan Mehta, Former President	2007	250,000	1,232,500	1,482,500
Gary DeMel, CEO	2009	0	0	0
Mike Lutton, President	2009	150,000	600,000	750,000
Wei Ling(Spelling)	2009	0	0	0

None of the stock awards to executives included unexercised options, stock that has not vested or equity incentive plan awards.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table provides the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock outstanding as of October 5, 2009 and by the officers and directors of NPDT as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.

	Common	Percent of	Preferred	Percent of
Name and Address	Shares	Class (1)	Shares	Class
Richard Damion (2)	189,643,457	10.54%	16,000,000	100%
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Gary Demel (3)	120,000,000	6.67%
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100
Michael Lutton	120,000,000	6.67%
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Robert George	16,384,998	0.91%
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Ketan Mehta	80,040,000	4.45%
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100
All executive officers, directors, and outside individuals as a group (five)	526,068,455	29.23%

(1) All percentages are calculated by giving effect to the potential exercise of options held by the applicable person, entity or group, but without giving effect to the potential exercise of options held by any other person, entity or group.

(2) Of the ~~189~~319,643,~~457~~000 common shares held by Mr. Damion, ~~183~~319,~~643~~637,~~457~~000 shares are owned outright. The remaining 6,000,000 shares are shares which can be acquired by Mr. Damion through the exercise of options.

(3) Of the 120,000,000 common shares held by Mr. DeMel, 120,000,000 shares are shares which can be acquired by Mr. DeMel through the exercise of options.

There have been no transactions by the company within last two years where either the company as an issuer, or a director, officer or shareholder of the company, had an indirect or direct interest except as follows:



·	Receipt of stock compensation by the officers and directors of NPDT for the dollar amount set forth in the executive compensation table;

· The receipt of 899,182 shares of common stock by Joseph R. Rodriguez, Jr., for cancellation of approximately $27,000 in debt owed to Mr. Rodriguez by NPDT. The stock was issued at the trading value on the date of settlement which is the same transaction given to third parties for the cancellation of debt.

· The receipt of 362,371 shares of common stock by Richard Damion for cancellation of approximately $10,800 in debt owed to Mr. Damion by NPDT. The stock was issued at the trading value on the date of settlement which is the same transaction given to third parties for the cancellation of debt.

PART IV

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 ~~was~~were approximately $1550,000.

Audit-~~related~~Related Fees. Our auditors did not bill any additional fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements.

Tax /Fees. The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009

All ~~other~~Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for all other non-audit services, such as attending meetings and other miscellaneous financial consulting, for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 were $0 and $0 respectively.

Item 15. Exhibits

Exhibits


Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

			Statement
	2	Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession	Not applicable

	3(i)	Articles of Incorporation	Incorporated by Reference

	3(ii)	Bylaws	Incorporated by Reference

	4	Instruments defining the righs of security holders, including indentures	Not applicable

	9	Voting Trust agreement	Not applicable

	12	Statements re computation of ratios	Not applicable

	13	Annual report to Security holders	Not applicable

14.1	Code of Ethics (included with Form 10-KSB filing on Nov. 16, 2004.)
31.1	Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(c) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002.
99.01	Definitions of an Independent Director



14	Code of Ethics	Incorporated by Reference

15	letter re unaudited interim financial information	Not Applicable

16	Letter re change in certifying accountant	Not applicable

18	Letter re change in accounting principles	Not applicable

19	Report furnished to Security holders	Not applicable

21	subsidiaries of the registrant	None

22	Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders	Not applicable

23	consents of experts and counsel	Not applicable

24	Power of attorney	Not applicable

31	31 (i) and (ii)	Included

32	32 Section 1350 Certs	Included

33	Report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset backed issuers	Not applicable

34	Attestation report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset backed securities	Not applicable

35	Service compliance statement	Not applicable

99	Additional Exhibits	None

100	XBRL related documents	Not applicable

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

~~By:~~(Formerly ~~/s/~~International ~~Gary~~Food ~~DeMel~~Products Group, Inc.)

~~Chief~~SIGNATURES ~~Executive Officer~~

~~Date:~~Pursuant ~~10/~~to the requirements of Section 13~~/2009~~ or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



Newport Digital Technologies, Inc.

By:		/s/ Donald Danks
Name:		Chief Executive officer
Title:		Principal Executive Officer
Date: October 12, 2010

~~By:~~Pursuant ~~/s/~~to ~~Richard~~the ~~Damion~~requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities stated and on the dates indicated.

Richard Damion, Director and



/s/ Donald Danks	Director and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)	October 12, 2010
Donald Danks

/s/ Weiling Tsao	Director and President	October 12, 2010
Weiling Tsao

/s/ Richard Damion	Director, Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Chief Financial officer (principal accounting officer)	October 12, 2010
Richard Damion

/s/ Mike Lutton	Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors	October 12, 2010
Mike Lutton

/s/ Robert George	Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer	October 12, 2010
Robert George

~~Principal Financial Officer~~38

Principal Accounting Officer

Date: 10/13/2009

By: /s/ Robert George

Robert George, Director

Date: 10/13/2009

By: /s/ Mike Lutten

President and Director

Date: 10/13/2009

Filing Compare · NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.