UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One):

X .

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _________

Commission File Number 001-09327

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California

95-2746949

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


340 North Camden Drive, Suite 302, Beverly Hills, CA		90210
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 248-3655

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, no par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes . No X .

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes . No X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes . No X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer .	Accelerated filer .
Non-accelerated filer . (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes . No X .

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of March 31, 2016, there were 1,500,326 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents


		Page
Part I
Item 1	Business	4
Item 1A	Risk Factors	8
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	13
Item 2	Properties	13
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	13
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	14

Part II
Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	14
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	15
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20
Item 8	Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	20
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	21
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	21
Item 9B	Other Information	23

Part III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	23
Item 11	Executive Compensation	25
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	27
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	30
Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	31

Part IV
Item 15	Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules	31
Signatures		35

PART 1

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to in this annual report as the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to in this annual report as the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact but rather reflect our current expectations, estimates and predictions about future results and events. These statements may use words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "predict," "project" and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management. When we make forward-looking statements, we are basing them on our management's beliefs and assumptions, using information currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including but not limited to, risks, uncertainties and assumptions discussed in this annual report. Factors that can cause or contribute to these differences include those described under the headings "Risk Factors" and "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward-looking statement you read in this annual report reflects our current views with respect to future events and is subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or individuals acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. You should specifically consider the factors identified in this annual report which would cause actual results to differ before making an investment decision. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report or to conform these statements to actual results.

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

Universal Detection Technology (the "Company," “UDT” or "We") is engaged in the marketing and resale of detection devices for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats. Through agreements with various third parties we supply bioterrorism detection kits capable of detecting anthrax, ricin, botulinum, plague, and SEBs, mold detection kits, chemical detection equipment, radiation detection systems, and counter-terrorism training references.

We have entered into supply and distribution agreements with various parties enabling us to supply a host of products and services for detection of hazardous materials and training references. By combining our in-house experience and knowledge and outside expertise offered by various consultants and third parties, we have added threat evaluation and consulting services, and training courses to our services. We sell and market security and counter-terrorism products including bioterrorism detection kits, chemical detectors, radiation detection systems, and training references. Some of the products and services we offer have not been sold to date and there is no guarantee that any of them will generate any interest or be sold in the market in the future. We plan to continue expanding our product base and intend to sell products to more users inside and outside the U.S. Our strategy is to generate sales by enhancing our web presence and marketing the Company as a supplier of complete CBRN detection equipment. We plan to attend various industry trade shows and to offer products in certain training scenarios so that first responders can become more familiar with our products. Our target customer markets primarily consist of first responders with some emphasis on the bioterror and military defense market. Our geographical customer focus is on the U.S., Europe, and Asia. There is no guarantee that we will succeed in implementing this strategy or if implemented, that this strategy will be successful.

Subsequent to the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan, we saw an increased demand in our radiation detection equipment. In response we formed new alliances with manufacturers of dosimeters and survey meters to supply the Japanese market. We witnessed increased sales of these systems and have shipped several units to Japanese customers since the disaster.

In late 2011 we started research and development on a new line of radiation detectors that can monitor the environment and surfaces for radiation and communicate the results with a smartphone enabling the user to save and share the test results instantaneously. In December 2011 we announced entering into an agreement with Honeywell India (a unit of Honeywell International) to develop a radiation detector which would display radiation data collected via Bluetooth to a smartphone. The product is designed to detect radiation levels on surfaces and food and to automatically send the collected data to a smartphone. According to the agreement with Honeywell, any and all intellectual property including any patents which may be filed will be the sole property of Universal Detection Technology.

We named this product RadSmart and while we expected to bring it to the market in 2012, technical and funding problems have postponed the release. We now anticipate the market release of RadSmart to be in 2013. In March 2012, we applied for a Federal Trademark for RadSmart with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). On October 16, 2012 our trademark was registered under registration number 4,225,651 with the USPTO. The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font, style, or color and it is for radiation detectors, in class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 AND 38).

RadSmart utilizes a Hamamatsu Cesium Iodide (CsI) scintillator for the detection of Gamma rays. Cs(I) scintillators are the most sensitive detection mechanisms for detecting Gamma radiation. The instrument will be sensitive enough to measure normal radiation levels to 100 to 200 times that intensity. With the planned detection range of 0.001 to 9.999 uSv/h the device is expected to be capable of detecting traces of radiation on surfaces, clothing and in particular food contamination, which has become an increasing concern globally after the Fukushima disaster in Japan.

We have incurred losses for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 in the approximate amounts of $175 thousand and $58 thousand, respectively, and have an accumulated deficit of $51 million as of December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2015, we were in default on certain debt obligations totaling approximately $800 thousand in addition to accumulated interest of approximately $2.1 million. We require approximately $1.3 million in the next 12 months to repay debt obligations. We do not anticipate that our cash on hand is adequate to meet our operating expenses over the next 12 months. In addition, we do not have adequate capital to repay all of our debt currently due and becoming due in the next 12 months. We principally expect to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities. During the past 12 months, management spent the substantial majority of its time on sales and marketing of the Company’s products and services. These activities diverted management from capital raising activities. We will actively continue to pursue additional equity or debt financing in the coming months, but cannot provide any assurances that it will be successful or on terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to pay our debts as they become due and are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, we will not be able to accomplish any or all of our initiatives and will be forced to consider other alternatives including suspending our business operations.

INDUSTRY BACKGROUND

The tragic events of September 11, 2001 redefined a new age of public safety and security, not only for the United States, but also for the entire world. In the wake of the tragedy, the world was shocked to learn of another nontraditional, deadly asymmetric weapon that was being deployed: lethal bioagents. A week after 9/11, envelopes containing anthrax, delivered by the U.S. Postal Service, were sent to five news media outlets, and on October 9th, two U.S. Senate offices. By November 2001, 22 people in four states and the District of Columbia contracted anthrax, many of them through the tainting of letters via the postal sorting machines. In all, the bioterrorism attacks claimed six lives.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, led by an independent U.S. congressional committee, asserts that a large scale biological attack, expected to hit somewhere in the world by the end of 2013, has yet to be seen.

Along with the grave predictions in the December 2008 report, World at Risk, the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, led by an independent U.S. congressional committee, listed recommendations on how the government can reduce the risk of a biological attack. In January 2010, the commission issued a report card following up on those recommendations. For its efforts to “enhance the nation’s capabilities for rapid response to prevent biological attacks from inflicting mass casualties,” the government received an “F” letter grade.

The United States Department of Homeland Security was formed to consolidate the federal government's efforts to secure the U.S. homeland, with the primary goal being an America that is stronger, safer, and more secure. The private sector also has responded to the need for preparedness against bioterrorism by developing numerous anti-terror products and services. As a result a market for anti-terror products and counter-attack products in the bioagent, nuclear, physical and radiological spheres has developed and continues to expand.

In 2011 a tragedy took place in Japan that changed the dynamic, size, and requirements of the market for equipment used to detect radiation and identify radioactive isotopes. On March 11, 2011 an earthquake sent a tsunami barreling into the coast, sparking a nuclear crisis at Fukushima, Japan. The tsunami caused massive damage to nuclear reactors causing unsafe levels of radioactive material to be spread over residential areas, agricultural land, and other surroundings. The people of Japan have since conducted widespread detection and decontamination efforts to repair the damages caused by the disaster. The tragedy, however, has opened the eyes of the public and experts alike to the hazards of radiation dissemination. The market for radiation detection systems has changed drastically. Not only the size of the market has increased but also there is a need for smarter, more accurate, smaller, and more user friendly systems.

OUR SOLUTIONS

Universal Detection Technology is a supplier of equipment and services used for detection of:

Chemical threats

Biological threats

Radiological and Nuclear threats

Mold

The chemical detection kits we offer serve to equip first responders and military personnel with tools that rapidly identify the presence of a chemical agent threat, such as extreme levels of acidity or basicity, chlorine/fluoride, hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide. Designed for use in the field for first responders or military personnel, the "Chameleon" detection system offers hands-free detection for harmful chemical agents and eliminates the need for a liquid sample. Users wear a portable chemical detection kit on their forearm. Each armband has a cassette holder containing up to ten (10) small cassettes, each of which can detect a unique chemical agent and identify its presence through a clear color-changing indicator. The Chameleon armband is fully functioning in extreme temperatures (-30 C to 50 C or -22 F to 122 F), and can operate while fully immersed in water. The Chameleon armband is a handheld chemical detection device which we market and sell to first responders. We purchase and distribute the Chameleon device from Morphix Technologies under an open-ended supply and distribution agreement. To date, we have sold a nominal number of such units resulting in insignificant revenue amounts. We have no exclusive rights under the distribution agreement and the agreement may be terminated upon 30 days prior notice by either party, or immediately upon a breach of the agreement. Under the terms of the Agreement, we are permitted to sell these products within the United States only.

The Company also supplies a handheld gas and vapor detector called ChemPro100i used for detection and classification of toxic industrial chemicals (TICs) and chemical warfare agents (CWAs). ChemPro100i’s multi-sensor detection array has 10 sensing channels, with a unique open-loop Ion Mobility Spectroscopy (IMS) sensor at its heart, to provide CWA sensitivity below military action levels, quick response and industry-leading false alarm rejection even to low vapor pressure threats like VX. We purchase and distribute the ChemPro100i device from Environics under an open-ended supply and distribution agreement. To date, we have not sold any ChemPro100i units resulting in no revenue. We have no exclusive rights under the distribution agreement and the agreement may be terminated upon 30 days prior notice by either party, or immediately upon a breach of the agreement. Under the terms of the Agreement, we are permitted to sell these products within the United States only.

The Company’s biological detection equipment gives first responders the ability to immediately identify the presence of deadly agents in a sample. These biological detection kits are handheld assays capable of detecting anthrax, ricin toxin, botulinum, plague, SEBs, and tularemia. The Company is in the process of adding more biological agents to the list of the threats that these handheld kits can identify. The detection kits are sold as TS-10-5, TS-10-T-5, ANT-12, RIC-12, BOT-12, PLA-12, SEB-12, TUL-12. We purchase and distribute these kits from Advnt Biotechnologies, LLC under a one year VAR and distribution agreement. We have no exclusive rights under the distribution agreement. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 60 days prior notice by either party or immediately upon a breach of the agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, we are permitted to sell these products throughout the world with no geographic restrictions.

In February 2011, the Company entered into a reseller agreement with Mirion Technologies Inc. (“Mirion Technologies”). Through the agreement, the Company offered nuclear detection and monitoring devices created and made by Mirion Technologies that include electronic dosimetry and teledosimetry devices. We had no exclusive rights under the distribution agreement. Under the terms of the original agreement, we were permitted to sell these products in the United States only. However, we amended the agreement via various items of correspondence with Mirion such that we can also sell these products in Japan. In April 2011, Mirion Technologies informed us that we could no longer purchase products directly from them to fill our orders and sales to Japan and the US. Through their referral and our own efforts, we have found several alternative suppliers of Mirion Technologies’ products, from whom we have been able to procure inventory and meet the demand of our customers thus far. As of April 2011, we no longer consider Mirion Technologies a supplier and do not rely on direct purchase of products from them.

In 2011 we initiated research and development efforts to design and produce a unique scintillator based radiation detection survey meter that would communicate its readings with a smartphone wirelessly via a Bluetooth module. We believe that using the computing power of the smart phone and new detection technologies will allow us to produce a much smaller and more accurate unit that will be more capable in terms of mapping, saving, and sharing the results over communication networks. We expected to unveil the first prototype of this device in 2012. However, due to lack of funding and a few technical difficulties with testing the technology that has been pushed back. We anticipate to unveil a prototype of RadSmart in 2013.

UDT’s Mold detection kit utilizes a highly accurate testing technology called immunochromatographic assay, also known as a rapid test or Hand-Held Assay (HHA). These devices have been used for over 30 years in the medical field for detecting disease, fertility, drugs of abuse and respiratory disorders. Designed to rapidly detect the presence of specific substances in field-collected samples, HHA’s have proven to be an indispensable tool for saving countless lives while reducing the time it takes to acquire results. Unlike the ATP test which detects any and all living cells, regardless of what those cells are, UDT’s kits detect only specific species of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Stachybotrys such as Stachybotrys chlorohalonata, Stachybotrys microspora, Stachybotrys echinata and Stachybotrys chartarum, in addition to certain Aspergillus and Penicillium sub-species. Each kit is individually packaged and includes everything necessary to run the test. No additional collection kits, readers or electronics are required. The Mold detection kit is sold as the MDK-2. We purchase and distribute MDK-2 from Advnt Biotechnologies LLC under the agreement described above. During 2012, we sold a nominal number of MDK-2 units.

Universal Detection Technology has also situated itself to provide various counter-terrorism services. Such services include training courses for first responders, event security, threat evaluation & consulting, and DVDs aimed at providing information and training regarding combating terrorism and managing emergency situations. Through a reseller agreement with Detrick Lawrence Corporation and its division, the Emergency Film Group, we market and sell a series of DVD’s related to combating terrorism and handling emergency situations and first response. To date, we have sold only a nominal amount of these services and products and the resulting revenue for 2012 was insignificant.

MARKETING AND SALES

Our sales and marketing plan includes strategic partnership agreements and retention of our in-house staff and outside consultants. The Company has retained the services of consultants to market its products in the United States and internationally. In the United States, we plan to continue presenting our technologies at industry events and trade shows. We also retain domestic distributors and consultants to arrange meetings with and presentations to building owners and operators, government officials in charge of decisions for safety and security of government and private venues and buildings, homeland security officials, and security companies. In 2015 we continued to use the internet to market and promote Universal Detection Technology and its products and services to the public. This strategy includes creation of an interactive and informational presence through our website and use of various third parties to bring traffic to our website. We intend to do more internet marketing and search engine optimization activities in future periods.

We also plan to develop brand recognition for our Company and for our products through attendance at national and international defense related exhibitions, use of print and video promotional materials, and by granting interviews to national and international news media.

We currently sell and plan to sell our products through a combination of unsolicited telephone orders, electronically generated sales via our website and in follow up to customer meetings or tradeshows.

MANUFACTURING

Currently, we do not have any manufacturing capabilities. In the past we have used original equipment manufacturers to manufacture our products. In addition to our own brands we also market third party brands that are related to our field of business. We are not obligated to continue to work with any of our current suppliers. As such, we may choose to work with other suppliers in the future. Should any of our supply and distribution agreements be terminated, we believe we can source adequate replacement supply parties and products without causing any material disruption to our business.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2015, we had one employee. We also employ outside consultants from time to time to provide various services. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We consider our employee relations to be good.

COMPETITION

We face intense competition from a number of companies that offer products in our targeted application areas. Our competitors may offer or be developing products superior to ours. Our competitors may be significantly better financed than us. There are various technological approaches available to our competitors and us that may be applicable to the detection of pathogens in the air or on surfaces, and the feasibility and effectiveness of these techniques has yet to be fully evaluated or demonstrated.

Several companies provide or are in the process of developing instruments for detection of bioterrorism agents. The biodetection kits we sell are small handheld assays that work based on sandwich immunoassay technology. We expect to encounter intense competition from a number of new development-stage companies that continue to enter the bioterrorism detection device market. Our competitors may succeed in developing or marketing technologies and products that are more effective or commercially attractive than our potential products or that render our technologies and potential products obsolete. As these companies develop their technologies, they may develop proprietary positions that prevent us from successfully commercializing our products.

There are many multinational and established manufacturers of radiation detection equipment. We will face intense competition from these manufacturers for marketing and selling our radiation detectors. Such competition will limit our ability to achieve market share and can affect our sales and revenues.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Company does not own any intellectual property rights with respect to the products it markets and sells. As such, the Company may be at a competitive disadvantage with respect to protecting its ability to continue to market and sell any particular device, even if such a device is in high demand. In contrast, many of the Company's competitors develop proprietary technologies and devices which compete with the products marketed by and sold by the Company. As such, such competitors can control the marketing, sales and further development of their product offerings in a manner that the Company cannot. Because the Company is a re-seller of products developed by other parties, it cannot control its product offerings as well as its competitors may be able to.

In December 2011 we announced entering into an agreement with Honeywell India (a unit of Honeywell International) to develop a radiation detector which would display radiation data collected via Bluetooth to a smartphone. We named this product RadSmart and we expect to bring it to the market. In March 2012, we applied for a Federal Trademark for RadSmart with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). On October 16, 2012 our trademark was registered under registration number 4,225,651 with the USPTO. The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font, style, or color and it is for radiation detectors, in class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 AND 38).

GENERAL

The Company was formed on December 24, 1971 in the State of California under the name Pollution Research and Control Corporation. It has operated continuously since that date. In August, 2003 the Company changed its name to Universal Detection Technology.

On July 5, 2012 the Company completed a one-for-twenty-thousand (1:20,000) reverse stock split for stockholders of record as of March 13, 2012 (the “Reverse Stock Split”) which resulted in 919,219 shares outstanding as of that date. All share and per share amounts discussed in this Annual Report give effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS TOGETHER WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT. SOME OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR SET FORTH ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT, INCLUDING INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO OUR PLANS AND STRATEGIES FOR OUR BUSINESS, INCLUDES FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. YOU SHOULD REVIEW THE "RISK FACTORS" SECTION OF THIS REPORT FOR A DISCUSSION OF IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE RESULTS DESCRIBED IN OR IMPLIED BY THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS ACTUALLY OCCUR, OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD SUFFER.

THERE IS DOUBT ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN.

Our financial statement for the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 includes an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, due to our working capital deficit at December 31, 2015. We have experienced operating losses since the year end. We may be impeded our ability to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, we will not be able to accomplish any or all of our initiatives and will be forced to consider steps that would protect our assets against our creditors. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, your entire investment in us could be lost.

WE ARE IN DEFAULT OF A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF OUR DEBT AND DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE CASH TO FUND OUR WORKING CAPITAL NEEDS. OUR FAILURE TIMELY TO PAY OUR INDEBTEDNESS MAY REQUIRE US TO CONSIDER STEPS THAT WOULD PROTECT OUR ASSETS AGAINST OUR CREDITORS.

If we cannot raise additional capital, we will not be able to repay our debt or pursue our business strategies as scheduled, or at all, and we may cease operations. We have been unable to pay all of our creditors and certain other obligations in accordance with their terms, and as a result, at December 31, 2015 we are in default on a portion of our debt totaling approximately $800 thousand excluding accumulated interest of approximately $2.1 million. In the aggregate, as of December 31, 2015, we have approximately $5.8 million in debt obligations, including interest, owing within the next 12 months. We cannot assure you that any of these note-holders will agree to extend payment of these debt obligations or ultimately agree to revise the terms of this debt to allow us to make scheduled payments over an extended period of time.

We have nominal cash on hand and short-term investments and we do not expect to generate material cash from operations within the next 12 months. We have attempted to raise additional capital through debt or equity financings and to date have had limited success. The downtrend in the financial markets has made it extremely difficult for us to raise additional capital. If we are unable to raise capital successfully, or reduce our debt through other means, we may be unable to continue operations.

THE COMPANY DOES NOT OWN ANY PROPRIETARY OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE PRODUCTS IT MARKETS AND SELLS

Other than the U.S. trademark the Company received on RadSmart branded product in October 2012, the Company does not own any intellectual property rights with respect to the products it markets and sells. The Company is a "reseller" of products available to it under supply and distribution agreements. As such, the Company may be at a competitive disadvantage with respect to protecting its ability to continue to market and sell any particular device, even if such device is in high demand. The Company cannot assure the availability of the products it sells or any improvements on such products. In addition, should such products become the subject of infringement claims by third parties, the Company may be unable to continue selling such products while such claims are unresolved. The Company would be forced to rely on the efforts of the owners of the products and underlying technologies to defend such suits should they arise. Such legal challenges, should they arise, would be detrimental to our operations. The Company believes it could source other suppliers of products should any of its suppliers become unable to sell product for any reason, however there can be no assurance that such replacement suppliers can be found timely or upon terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.

WE HAVE NO ABILITY TO FINANCE SIGNFICANT ORDERS OF OUR PRODUCTS OR TO PREPAY FOR ORDERS THAT MAY REQUIRE SUCH PAYMENT; WE MAY BE UNABLE TO TIMELY FULFILL ORDERS, IF AT ALL

The Company is a "reseller" of products available to it under supply and distribution agreements.

When we obtain products for resale to our customers, we must be able to finance the purchase of such products. When the quantities and/or unit prices are low or nominal, we can finance that acquisition through existing cash, or require pre-payment from our customers, or request that the supply invoices be payable at a point in the future subsequent to the collection of the purchase price from our customers. The products we offer vary in price from several hundred dollars per unit to several thousand dollars per unit. From time to time, our management has made loans to the Company the proceeds of which are used for general operations including the acquisition of limited amount of product for demonstration and resale. Currently, we believe that none of our accounts receivable would be attractive to commercial finance lenders or factors as a means to finance product acquisition. Should we be successful in generating significant purchase requests for the products we market and sell, we may be unable to process those orders due to a lack of financing opportunities and a lack of cash on hand. While we may attempt to structure such orders, should they arise, in a way that provides for payment in advance from customers, or payment of invoices after customer collection, or upon a factoring or other finance arrangement, there can be no assurance that we can structure the financing terms in a manner that supports product acquisition in large quantities, if at all. In addition, we have no control over how quickly our suppliers will make product available to us. Even assuming we can finance orders of all sizes, we must rely upon our suppliers to provide product and ship product in a timely manner. However, we cannot control the timing and shipment of the products that we resell. If we are able to generate purchase orders, we may be unable to fulfill them timely and upon financing terms acceptable to us or our suppliers and customers, which would be detrimental to our operations.

WE HAVE A HISTORY OF LOSSES AND WE DO NOT ANTICIPATE THAT WE WILL BE PROFITABLE IN FISCAL 2012.

We do not anticipate generating significant sales. We have not been profitable in the past years and had an accumulated deficit of approximately $51.09 million at December 31, 2015. We have had little revenues from sales of our products since the beginning of fiscal 2002, the commencement of our entry in the counter terrorism market. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had losses of $175,284 and $57,550, respectively. During fiscal 2015, we did not generate any gross revenue. Achieving profitability depends upon numerous factors, including our ability to develop, market, and sell commercially accepted products timely and cost-efficiently. We do not anticipate that we will be profitable in the immediate or near future.

IF WE OBTAIN FINANCING, EXISTING SHAREHOLDER INTERESTS MAY BE DILUTED.

If we raise additional funds by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our shareholders will be diluted. In addition, any convertible securities issued may not contain a minimum conversion price, which may make it more difficult for us to raise financing and may cause the market price of our common stock to decline because of the indeterminable overhang that is created by the discount to market conversion feature. In addition, any new securities could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common stock. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that additional financing will be available when and to the extent we require or that, if available, it will be on acceptable terms.

MANAGEMENT HAS LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN SALES AND DISTRIBUTION. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MARKET AND DISTRIBUTE PRODUCTS EFFECTIVELY, WHICH COULD HARM OUR FUTURE PROSPECTS.

If we are unable to establish a successful sales, marketing, and distribution operation, we will not be able to generate sufficient revenue in order to maintain operations. We have limited experience in marketing or distributing new products. We have limited experience in developing, training, or managing a sales force. If we choose to establish a direct sales force, we will incur substantial additional expense. We may not be able to build a sales force on a cost effective basis or at all. Any direct or internet marketing and sales efforts may prove to be unsuccessful. In addition, our marketing and sales efforts may be unable to compete with the extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations of some of our competitors. We also may be unable to engage qualified distributors. Even if engaged, they may fail to satisfy financial or contractual obligations to us, or adequately market our products.

OUR PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE COMMERCIALLY ACCEPTED WHICH WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUES AND PROFITABILITY.

Our ability to enter into the CBRN detection device market, establish brand recognition and compete effectively depends upon many factors, including broad commercial acceptance of our products. If our products are not commercially accepted, we will not recognize meaningful revenue and may not continue to operate. The success of our products will depend in large part on the breadth of information these products capture and the timeliness of delivery of that information. The commercial success of our products also depends upon the quality and acceptance of other competing products, general economic and political conditions and other factors, all of which can change and cannot be predicted with certainty. We cannot assure you that our new products will achieve market acceptance or will generate significant revenue.

EXISTING AND DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGIES MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS.

Our industry is subject to rapid and substantial technological change. Developments by others may render our technologies and planned products noncompetitive or obsolete, or we may be unable to keep pace with technological developments or other market factors. Competition from other companies, universities, governmental research organizations and others diversifying into our field is intense and is expected to increase.

SHARES ISSUED UPON THE EXERCISE OF OUR OUTSTANDING OPTIONS AND WARRANTS, OR UPON THE CONVERSION OF PROMISSORY NOTES, MAY DILUTE YOUR STOCK HOLDINGS AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE.

If exercised, our outstanding options and warrants will cause immediate and substantial dilution to our stockholders. We have issued options and warrants to acquire our common stock to our employees, consultants, and investors at various prices, some of which are or may in the future be below the market price of our stock. As of December 31, 2015, we had outstanding options and warrants to purchase a total of 120,002 shares of common stock. Of these options and warrants, all have exercise prices at or above the recent market price of $0.24 per share (as of April 15, 2013) and none have exercise prices at or below this price. In addition, because of our financial condition and substantial indebtedness and our need to raise capital, from time to time we have converted outstanding debt obligations into common stock. During 2012, we converted debt at conversion prices at $4 per share. Our conversion of outstanding debt obligations to common stock, as well as the exercise of outstanding options and warrants to purchase common stock, which the Board of Directors may authorize and undertake from time to time, may dilute the stockholdings of current shareholders.

THE LOSS OF OUR PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER WOULD DISRUPT OUR BUSINESS.

Our success depends in substantial part upon the services of Jacques Tizabi, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. The loss of or the failure to retain the services of Mr. Tizabi would adversely affect the development of our business and our ability to realize profitable operations. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on Mr. Tizabi and have no present plans to obtain this insurance.

WE MAY BE SUED BY THIRD PARTIES WHO CLAIM THE PRODUCTS WE SELL INFRINGE ON THEIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. DEFENDING AN INFRINGEMENT LAWSUIT IS COSTLY AND WE MAY NOT HAVE ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO DEFEND OURSELVES.

We may be exposed to future litigation by third parties based on claims that the products we sell infringe on the intellectual property rights of others or that we have misappropriated the trade secrets of others. This may be true even if we do not own the technologies embedded in the products we sell. This risk is compounded by the fact that the validity and breadth of claims covered in technology patents in general and the breadth and scope of trade secret protection involves complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles are unresolved. Any litigation or claims against us, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs, could place a significant strain on our financial and managerial resources, and could harm our reputation.

CURRENCY RISK

Some of our sales come from sales in Japan and that leaves us open to the risk associated with the valuation of the Japanese Yen. If the Japanese Yen becomes less valuable our products will be relatively more expensive and can therefore lose their competitive advantage. Our margins as a reseller are very thin and a currency devaluation in Japan can diminish our ability to compete or sell in that market.

HEAVY RELIANCE ON THE JAPANESE MARKET

Our sales are predominantly in Japan and have peaked since the March 11, 2011 disaster in Fukushima that resulted in damage to nuclear reactors and release of radioactive material in the ground and in the atmosphere. There is no assurance that the demand for radiation detection equipment will remain high in Japan and if such demand fades, we will recognize lower revenues.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

We are spending resources on research and development related to a smartphone compatible radiation detector, RadSmart. Development of new products is inherently risky and there is no assurance that RadSmart will perform as well as it is designed to perform. Furthermore, the market for RadSmart might shrink in size or cease to exist by the time the product is ready and available for purchase. The market might not accept RadSmart as a reliable detection device and as such, our sales of RadSmart might be zero or very limited.

WE HAVE NOT PAID ANY CASH DIVIDENDS AND NO CASH DIVIDENDS WILL BE PAID IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, and we cannot assure an investor that funds will be legally available to pay a dividend or that even if the funds are legally available, that a dividend will be paid.

THE APPLICATION OF THE “PENNY STOCK” RULES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND INCREASE YOUR TRANSACTION COSTS TO SELL THOSE STOCK.

As long as the trading price of our common stock is below $5 per share, the open-market trading of our common stock will be subject to the “penny stock” rules. The “penny stock” rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of securities and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction before the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the broker-dealer must deliver, before the transaction, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information on the limited market in penny stocks. These additional burdens imposed on broker-dealers may restrict the ability or decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to sell our common stock, and may result in decreased liquidity for our common stock and increased transaction costs for sales and purchases of our common stock as compared to other securities.

A DTC “CHILL” ON ELECTRONIC CLEARING OF TRADES IN OUR COMMON STOCK MAY AFFECT THE LIQUIDITY OF OUR STOCK AND OUR ABILITY TO RAISE CAPITAL.

In September 2011, The Depositary Trust Company (DTCC) placed a "chill" on the electronic clearing of trades in our shares which led to some firms being unwilling to accept certificates of our stock and also some will not accept trades in our shares altogether. The Company has sought advice from third parties on removal of the DTC chill. On February 1, 2013 the DTCC lifted the deposit chill and resumed accepting deposits of our stock and book-entry transfer services. A DTC chill affects the liquidity in our shares which, if reinstated, may make it difficult to purchase or sell shares.

OUR STOCK PRICE IS VOLATILE.

The trading price of our common stock fluctuates widely and in the future may be subject to similar fluctuations in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general conditions in the terrorism detection device industry in which we compete and other events or factors. In addition, in recent years, broad stock market indices, in general, and the securities of technology companies, in particular, have experienced substantial price fluctuations. These broad market fluctuations also may adversely affect the future trading price of our common stock.

OUR STOCK HISTORICALLY FLUCTUATES WIDELY IN TRADING VOLUME AND PRICE. THEREFORE, SHAREHOLDERS MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SELL THEIR SHARES FREELY OR AT PRICES AND AT TIMES THAT THEY DESIRE TO SELL SHARES.

The volume of trading in our common stock historically has fluctuated and a limited market presently exists for the shares. We have no analyst coverage of our securities. The lack of analyst reports about our stock may make it difficult for potential investors to make decisions about whether to purchase our stock and may make it less likely that investors will purchase our stock. Our stock trades in a wide fluctuation of volume that we cannot predict or control. We cannot assure you that our trading volume will increase, or that our historically light trading volume or any trading volume whatsoever will be sustained in the future. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our shareholders will be able to sell their shares of our common stock at the time or at the price that they desire, or at all.

POTENTIAL ANTI-TAKEOVER TACTICS AND RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES GRANTED THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK RIGHTS MAY BE DETRIMENTAL TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS.

We are authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The issuance of preferred stock does not require approval by the shareholders of our common stock. Our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, has the power to issue preferred stock in one or more series and establish the dividend rates and preferences, liquidation preferences, voting rights, redemption and conversion terms and conditions and any other relative rights and preferences with respect to any series of preferred stock. Holders of preferred stock may have the right to receive dividends, certain preferences in liquidation and conversion and other rights, any of which rights and preferences may operate to the detriment of the shareholders of our common stock. Further, the issuance of any preferred stock having rights superior to those of our common stock may result in a decrease in the market price of the common stock and, additionally, could be used by our Board of Directors as an anti-takeover measure or device to prevent a change in our control.

IF WE FAIL TO MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ACCURATELY REPORT OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS. AS A RESULT, CURRENT AND POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS COULD LOSE CONFIDENCE IN OUR FINANCIAL REPORTING, WHICH WOULD HARM OUR BUSINESS AND THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR STOCK.

Our management has determined that as of December 31, 2015, we did not maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework as a result of identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as described later in this Report in Part II – Item 9A – Controls and Procedures. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. If the result of our remediation of the identified material weaknesses described in this Report are not successful, or if additional material weaknesses are identified in our internal control over financial reporting, our management will be unable to report favorably as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and/or our disclosure controls and procedures, and we could be required to further implement expensive and time-consuming remedial measures and potentially lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports which could have an adverse effect on our stock price and potentially subject us to litigation.

OUR ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL COMMON STOCK, OR OPTIONS TO PURCHASE OUR STOCK, WOULD DILUTE YOUR PROPORTIONATE OWNERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS.

We are entitled under our articles of incorporation to issue up to 20,020,000,000 shares of capital stock which includes 20,000,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. Our Preferred Stock may be designated in a senior position to our common stock. After giving effect to our July 2012 Reverse Stock Split, we are authorized to issue up to 20,000,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock as of May 1, 2013. Our board of directors may generally issue stock, or options or warrants to purchase those shares, without further approval by our stockholders based upon such factors as our board of directors may deem relevant at that time. It is likely that we will be required to issue a large amount of additional securities to raise capital to further our development or convert outstanding indebtedness to equity. It is also likely that we will be required to issue a large amount of additional securities to directors, officers, employees and consultants as compensatory grants in connection with their services, both in the form of stand-alone grants or under our stock plans. We cannot give you any assurance that we will not issue additional common stock, or options or warrants to purchase those shares, under circumstances we may deem appropriate at the time.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable for Smaller Reporting Companies.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

We currently do not own any real property. Our corporate headquarters are located at 340 N. Camden Drive, Suite 302, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, USA. We lease this office on a month-to-month term. The base monthly rent is $500. We believe this operating space is adequate for the Company's needs for the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. (Case No. BC 274013 Los Angeles Superior Court) for amounts due in connection with unpaid rent. A judgment was entered for $411,500. No amounts have been paid in connection with the judgment. As of December 31, 2012, $411,500 has been accrued.

On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose, and Mark Rose commenced an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company (A. SEAN ROSE, CLAIRE F. ROSE AND MARK ROSE V. UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, FKA POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORPORATION) for amounts allegedly due pursuant to four unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the “Agreement”). On December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and sought approximately $205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11, 2006 for $209,277.58. The Company has previously accrued for this settlement. As of December 31, 2012, we have accrued $661,929 for this settlement including principal and interest.

On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (TRILOGY CAPITAL PARTNERS V. UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, ET. AL., Case No. SC089929) against the Company. Plaintiff's Complaint alleged damages against UDT for breach of an engagement letter in the amount of $93,448.54. Also, Plaintiff alleged that UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written agreement. After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting extensive mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000 until a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was fully paid. In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against UDT. UDT has not been current on all of its agreed payments to Plaintiff. As of December 31 2012, $28,098 was due under the agreement.

On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. BC361979) against UDT. NBGI, Inc.'s Complaint alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of $111,014.34 plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. A Motion for Summary Judgment was set for September 11, 2007. The Summary Judgment was granted in NBGI’s favor and judgment has been entered. No payments have been made on this judgment and no actions to enforce the judgment have been taken against UDT.

On November 1, 2010 the accounting firm of A.J. Robbins, P.C. filed a lawsuit in the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado, seeking recovery of fees allegedly owed for accounting services performed during 2004 to 2008. The claims have been asserted against the Company, a second corporate defendant, and our CEO, as a result of a personal guarantee. On December 15, 2010, Defendants filed an Answer which asserted several defenses. The parties exchanged initial disclosures, and the matter was set for trial commencing on December 5, 2011. On August 3, 2011 the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Defendants in the case will jointly pay $85,000 to the plaintiffs and the Company will issue $45,000 of the Company’s stock to the plaintiffs. The Company was responsible to pay 50% of the cash payments, the other 50% of which was the responsibility of a second defendant. The cash payments were scheduled to be made in equal monthly payments over 7 months commencing on August 31, 2011. In consideration of the settlement, the parties have executed a mutual release and have agreed to withdraw the lawsuit. The releases and withdrawal are contingent upon the Company's full performance of the settlement agreement terms. The Company issued stock with a fair market value of $36,000 on the date of the agreement in full payment of the stock portion of the settlement agreement. As of November 11, 2012, the Company and the second corporate defendant have fulfilled all the obligations with respect to this liability and all of the $85,000 has been paid to the plaintiffs.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

This item is not applicable to the Company’s business.

PART II

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “UNDT.” The following table sets forth the high and low bid information of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board for each quarter during the last two fiscal years, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board. This information reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.


Year	Period
		High Bid	Low Bid
2014	First Quarter	0.18	0.03
	Second Quarter	0.18	0.06
	Third Quarter	0.1949	0.0007
	Fourth Quarter	0.1787	0.0297

2015	First Quarter	0.09	0.0316
	Second Quarter	0.10	0.04
	Third Quarter	0.10	0.022
	Fourth Quarter	0.18	0.03

HOLDERS OF RECORD

As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately 2,600 shareholders of record of our common stock. Our Transfer Agent is Worldwide Stock Transfer, LLC located at 433 Hackensack Avenue, Level L, Hackensack, NJ 07601. Worldwide Stock Transfer’s phone number is (201) 820-2010.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We do not currently pay any dividends on our common stock, and we currently intend to retain any future earnings for use in our business. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors including the General Corporation Law of the State of California, which provides that dividends are only payable out of retained earnings or if certain minimum ratios of assets to liabilities are satisfied. The declaration of dividends on our common stock also may be restricted by the provisions of credit agreements that we may enter into from time to time.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

None

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable for Smaller Reporting Companies.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements provided in this annual report on Form 10-K. Certain statements contained herein may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, as discussed more fully herein.

The forward-looking information set forth in this annual report is as of the date of this filing, and we undertake no duty to update this information. More information about potential factors that could affect our business and financial results is included in the section of this annual report entitled "Risk Factors."

OVERVIEW

We are engaged in the marketing and resale of detection devices for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats. Through agreements with various third parties we seek to supply bioterrorism detection kits capable of detecting anthrax, ricin, botulinum, plague, and SEBs, mold detection kits, chemical detection equipment, radiation detection systems, and counter-terrorism training references.

We have entered into supply and distribution agreements with various parties enabling us to supply a host of products and services for detection of hazardous materials and training references. By combining our in-house experience and knowledge and outside expertise offered by various consultants and third parties, we have added threat evaluation and consulting services, and training courses to our services. We sell and market security and counter-terrorism products including bioterrorism detection kits, chemical detectors, radiation detection systems, and training references. Some of the products and services we offer have not been sold to date and there is no guarantee that any of them will be demanded and sold in the market in the future. We plan to continue expanding our product base and intend to sell products to more users inside and outside the U.S. Our strategy is to generate sales by enhancing our web presence and marketing the Company as a supplier of complete CBRN detection equipment. We plan to attend various industry trade shows and to offer products in certain training scenarios so that first responders can become more familiar with our products. Our target customer markets primarily consist of first responders with some emphasis on the bioterror and military defense market. Our geographical customer focus is on the U.S., Europe, and Asia. There is no guarantee that we will succeed in implementing this strategy or if implemented, that this strategy will be successful.

Our business operations are more fully described under "Description Business" in Item 1 of Part I of this Report.

Results of Operations

The following discussion is included to describe our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contain detailed information that should be referred to in conjunction with this discussion.

Revenue – Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $-0- as compared to $7,531 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease derived from a significant reduction in marketing outreach while the company evaluates new capital opportunities.

Operating Expenses –Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $75,046. Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $99,930 representing a decrease of $24,884. The decrease is primarily attributable to an extensive reduction if our overall operation.

Other expenses. Other expenses amounted to $100,238 for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $100,008, primarily interest expense offset by a gain in other income of $134,847 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The change is principally related to the reduction in loss recognized on the settlement of shares issued for debt and the increase in interest expense for accrued interest on judgments and other outstanding debt.

Net loss. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $175,284, as compared to a net loss of $57,550 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, representing a loss increase of $117,734. The primary reason for this is a decrease is a reduction in other income (expense) and revenues partially offset by operating expenses all as discussed above.

PLAN OF OPERATION

We supply chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear (CBRN), and mold detection equipment. We plan to continue expanding our product base and to sell our products to more users inside and outside the U.S. There is no guarantee that we will succeed in implementing this strategy or if implemented, that this strategy will be successful.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We require up to approximately $5.1 million to repay indebtedness including interest in the next 12 months. We do not anticipate that our cash on hand or anticipated revenues from operations will be adequate to meet our operating expenses over the next 12 months. Also, we do not believe we have adequate capital to repay all of our debt currently due and becoming due in the next 12 months. We anticipate that our available capital during the next 12 months principally will be used for:

administrative expenses, including salaries of officers and other employees we plan to hire;

repayment of debt;

sales and marketing;

product development, testing and manufacturing; and

expenses of professionals, including accountants and attorneys.

Our accumulated deficit at December 31, 2015 was $51,087,820. There is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, due to our working capital deficit at December 31, 2015.

The following provides principal terms of our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2015:

One loan from three family members, each of whom is an unaffiliated party, evidenced by four promissory notes in the aggregate principal amounts of $100,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $100,000, each due September 24, 2001 with interest rates ranging from 11% to 12%. We entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, we were required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. We did not make this payment and are in default of these notes. As of December 31, 2015, we have $699,102 accrued for including interest relating to this matter.

One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $195,000 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated as of August 10, 2004, we entered into a settlement with this party and agreed to pay a total of $261,000 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. Additionally, the Company, in September 2004, issued 206,250 shares of common stock upon the conversion of unpaid interest in the aggregate amount of $33,000. At December 31, 2015, there was $161,000 principal amount remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note and we owed $136,538 in interest on this note.

One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $98,500, due July 31, 2005, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At December 31, 2015, there was $71,500 and accrued interest of $58,304. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 due on March 31, 2006 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $91,500 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2006. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500 due September 27, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $1,892 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on June 27, 2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $9,940 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $9,940 in principal and approximately $7,285 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,638 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $1,638 in principal and approximately $1,281 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,420 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $1,420 in principal and $1,122 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $776 due on September 3, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $951 in principal balance and approximately $543 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on September 3, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from Scarborough Limited, an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note dated June 6, 2012, in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on July 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 5.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $30,000 in principal and approximately $5,241 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on July 25, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $36,500 in principal and approximately $12,483 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on August 8, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $40,000 in principal and $20,000 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $35,000 due on August 16, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $35,000 in principal and $17,115 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 11, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $60,000 in principal and 27,400 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 21, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $60,000 in principal and $27,400 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on December 20, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $50,000 in principal and $22,500 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on January 26, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $50,000 in principal and $ 16,000 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on January 31, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, we owed $50,000 in principal and $22,000 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on February 16, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $60,000 in principal and $26,100 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on February 21, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $40,000 in principal and $16,750 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on July 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 5.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $30,000 in principal and $9,100 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $27,500 due on April 24, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $27,500 in principal and $7,700 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $41,623 due on August 14, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $41,623 in principal and $11,187 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $41,848 due on August 21, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $41,848 in principal and $11,414 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $32,500 due on May 27, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $32,500 in principal and $10,967 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $120,435 due on September 24, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, we owed $120,435 in principal and $28,905 in interest.

Cash Requirements

We expect to incur losses in the development of our business and will require:

administrative expenses, including salaries of officers and other employees we plan to hire;

repayment of debt;

sales and marketing;

product testing or manufacturing; and

expenses of professionals, including accountants and attorneys.

These requirements cast substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from business operations when they come due.

Management continues to take steps to address the Company's liquidity needs. In the past, management has entered into agreements with some of our note holders to amend the terms of our notes to provide for extended scheduled payment arrangements. Management is engaged in discussions with each holder of debt that is in default and continues to seek extensions with respect to our debt that is past due. In addition, management may endeavor to convert some portion of the principal amount and interest on our debt into shares of common stock.

Historically, we have financed operations through private debt and equity financings. In recent years, financial institutions have been unwilling to lend to us and the cost of obtaining working capital from investors has been high. We principally intend to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities. The more recent price and volume volatility in our common stock has made it more difficult for management to negotiate sales of its securities at a price it believes to be fair to the Company. The Company actively continues to pursue additional equity or debt financings, but cannot provide any assurance that it will be successful. If we are unable to pay our debt as it becomes due and are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, we will not be able to accomplish any or all of our initiatives and will be forced to consider steps that would protect our assets against our creditors.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, and that would be considered material to investors.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future events, however, may differ markedly from our current expectations and assumptions. While there are a number of significant accounting policies affecting our financial statements; we believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most complex, difficult and subjective estimates and judgments:

USE OF ESTIMATES

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, accordingly, require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

GOING CONCERN

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, and do not reflect any adjustments related to the uncertainty surrounding our recurring losses or accumulated deficit.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Sales revenue is recognized at the date of shipment to customers when a formal arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as unearned revenue. Service revenue is recognized when services are performed and amounts are due.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Our short-term financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and other liabilities, consist primarily of instruments without extended maturities, the fair value of which, based on management’s estimates, reasonably approximate their book value. The fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments is determined using option pricing models.

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION TO OTHER THAN EMPLOYEES

Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably determinable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earlier of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable for Smaller Reporting Companies.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our financial statements and related notes are set forth at pages F-1 through F-7 below.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Balance Sheets	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-4

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-5

F-1

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND DECEMBER 31, 2014

(UNAUDITED)


	As of
	December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	100	$	100
Accounts Receivable, net		1,099		1,099
Other Receivable		-		-
Inventory		58,887		58,887
Total current assets		60,086		60,086

Deposits		21,300		21,300
Equipment, net		2,262		2,262
Total assets	$	83,648	$	83,648


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable, trade	$	1,352,780	$	1,319,744
Accrued liabilities		653,873		653,873
Unearned revenue		-		-
Accrued payroll - officers		915,759		873,259
Notes payable - related party		135,432		135,432
Notes payable		667,272		500,097
Accrued interest expense		2,091,789		1,991,781
Total current liabilities		5,816,905		5,474,186

Long term notes payable		-		167,175
Total liabilities		5,816,905		5,641,361

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued and outstanding		-		-
Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000,000 shares authorized, 1,500,326 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		39,742,528		39,742,528
Additional paid-in-capital		5,613,089		5,613,089
Accumulated deficit		(51,087,820)		(50,913,300)
Total stockholders' deficit		(5,733,257)		(5,557,713)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	83,648	$	83,648

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

F-2

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31, 2015 AND 2014

(UNAUDITED)


	For the years December 31,
	2015		2014

REVENUE, NET	$	-	$	7,531
COST OF GOODS SOLD		-		-
GROSS PROFIT		-		7,531

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative		75,046		98,664
Marketing		-		375
Depreciation and amortization		-		891
Total operating expenses		75,046		99,930

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(75,046)		(92,399)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense		(100,008)		(100,008)
Other income		(230)		134,847
Loss on settlement of debt		-		-
Total other expenses		(100,238)		34,839)

NET LOSS	$	(175,284)	$	(57,550)

NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:	$	(0.117)	$	(0.038)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING		1,500,326		1,500,326

Weighted average number of dilutive securities has not been calculated as the effect of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

F-3

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

(UNAUDITED)


	For the year ended December 31,
	2015		2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(175,284)	$	(57,550)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Stocks issued for services		-		-
Loss on settlement of debt		-		-
Depreciation		-		889
Amortization of note discount and loan fees		-		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Inventory		-		-
Unearned Revenue				-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		175,284		54,677
Net cash used in operating activities		-		(1,974)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment		-		-
Net cash used in investing activities		-		-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock subscriptions		-		-
Proceeds from notes payable-related party		-		-
(Payments on)/proceeds from notes payable		-		-
Payments on notes payable - related party		-		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		-		-

NET INCREASE/DECREASE IN CASH				(1,974)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		100		2,074

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	100	$	100

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income tax	$	-	$	-
Interest Paid	$	-	$	-

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES FOR NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Shares issued for settlement of debt and accrued interest	$	-	$	-
Shares issued for settlement of debt and accrued payroll - related party	$	-	$	-
Shares issued for loan fees	$	-	$	-

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-4

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Universal Detection Technology, a California corporation, primarily designs, manufactures and markets air pollution monitoring instruments. Beginning in 2002, the Company has focused its research and development efforts in developing a real time biological weapon detection device. To accelerate development of its initial biological weapon detection device, the Company has developed and is implementing a collaborative partnering strategy. Under this strategy, the Company identifies and partners with researchers and developers. The Company has expanded its services to include security related consulting, event security and counterterrorism training.

The Company is a reseller of a range of products, which include rapid anthrax detection test kits, training courses for first responders, event security, threat evaluation and consulting, radiation detection systems, anti-microbial products, and DVDs aimed at providing information and training regarding combating terrorism and managing emergency situations.

NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Principles

In the opinion of management, the accompanying balance sheets and related interim statements of income, and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with information included in the Company’s 2014 Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of Universal Detection Technology and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Nutek, Inc. (“Nutek”) and Logan Medical Devices, Inc. (“Logan”). The two subsidiaries are currently inactive. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current year presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued amended standards to simplify how entities test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment which improve consistency in impairment testing requirements among long-lived asset categories. These amended standards permit an assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. For assets in which this assessment concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value is more than its carrying value, these amended standards eliminate the requirement to perform quantitative impairment testing as outlined in the previously issued standards. These amended standards are effective for us beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012; however, early adoption is permitted. We do not expect these new standards to significantly impact our consolidated condensed financial statements.

F-5

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. The new guidance provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that this is the case, it is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit (if any). If an entity determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. The new guidance will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2012. We do not expect the adoption will have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Instead, an entity will be required to present either a continuous statement of net income and other comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2012 and will have financial statement presentation changes only. We do not expect the adoption will have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.

NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $51,087,820 as of December 31, 2015, including a net loss of $175,284 during the year ended December 31, 2015.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to develop additional sources of capital and ultimately achieve profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

Management has taken certain steps to provide the Company with necessary capital to continue its operations. These steps include: 1) actively seeking additional funding in the form of unsecured indebtedness and 2) seeking to increase revenues from product sales.

NOTE 4. NOTES PAYABLE

As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had total notes payable amounting to $802,704 and $802,704 respectively.

The interest expense on these notes payable for the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 amounted to $100,008 and $100,008, respectively.

NOTE 5. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

Issuance of Common Stock

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company did not issue any shares of its common stock.

Stock Options

On February 11, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 15,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 15,000 shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

F-6

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

On April 29, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-2 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 16,500 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 16,342 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On July 1, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-3 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 125 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 125 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On September 2, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-4 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 190 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 190 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On February 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan.”) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are no it connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transactions. The company initially reserved 500 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 500 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On May 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009-2 Equity Incentive Plan (The “Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 3,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 2,980 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

On November 6, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009-3 Equity Incentive Plan (The “Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 10,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 10,000 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

On May 6, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (The “Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 30,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 30,000 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

On October 27, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (The “2011-II Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 60,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 60,000 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

F-7

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES

Our effective tax rates were approximately (0.0)% and (0.0)% for the nine-months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Our effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate due to, net operating loss carry-forwards available to offset current and future taxable income.

NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company was involved in the following litigations:

On May 15, 2002, Walt Disney World Co. commenced action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company and a former wholly-owned subsidiary (WALT DISNEY WORLD CO. V. POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORP. AND DASIBI ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. (Case No. BC 274013 Los Angeles Superior Court) for amounts due in connection with unpaid rent. A judgment was entered for $411,500. No amounts have been paid in connection with the judgment. As of June 30, 2012, $411,500 has been accrued.

A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose and Mark Rose v. Universal Detection Technology, Pollution Research and Control Corporation (Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, North Central District, Case No. EC042040)

On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the Company (Case No. EC 038824) for amounts allegedly due pursuant to four unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the “Agreement”). On December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced the above-referenced action against the Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and seeking approximately $205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11, 2006. The Company has accrued for this settlement. The Company entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these three parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, the Company was required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. The Company did not make this payment and are in default of these notes. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has $668,183 and $661,929, respectively, accrued for including interest relating to this matter which is part of notes payable and accrued interest in the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (Trilogy Capital Partners v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. SC089929) against the Company. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleged damages against UDT for breach of an engagement letter in the amount of $93,449. Also, Plaintiff alleged that UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written agreement. After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting extensive mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000 until a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was fully paid. In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against UDT. As of September 30, 2011, $28,098 was due under the agreement and is included in the accounts payable in the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2012.

On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. BC361979) against the Company. NBGI, Inc.’s Complaint alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of $111,014 plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. No payments have been made on this judgment and no actions to enforce the judgment have been taken against UDT.

On June 24, 2010, Plaintiff Meyers Associates, L.P. commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled Meyers Associates, L.P. v. Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"), case No. 108321/10. The complaint alleges breach of contract and damages related to performance by Meyers Associates, L.P. ("Meyers") of an investment banking services agreement dated December 22, 2005 and UDT's alleged failure to compensate Meyers for such services under the terms of the agreement. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of approximately $116,000 plus an award of court costs and attorneys fees. In October 2010, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion for Default Judgment against UDT and filed a Request for Judicial Intervention in connection therewith. The Company has not received any further communication regarding this action and does not know if a default judgment was granted.

F-8

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

On November 1, 2010 the accounting firm of A.J. Robbins, P.C. filed a lawsuit in the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado, seeking recovery of fees allegedly owed for accounting services performed during 2004 to 2008. The claims have been asserted against the Company, a second corporate defendant, and our CEO, as a result of a personal guarantee. On December 15, 2010, Defendants filed an Answer which asserted several defenses. The parties have exchanged initial disclosures, and the matter has been set for trial commencing on December 5, 2011. On August 3, 2011 the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Defendants in the case will jointly pay $85,000 to the plaintiffs and the Company will issue $45,000 of the Company’s stock to the plaintiffs. The cash payments will be made in equal monthly payments over 7 months commencing on August 31, 2011. In consideration of the settlement, the parties have executed a mutual release and have agreed to withdraw the lawsuit. The releases and withdrawal are contingent upon the Company's full performance of the settlement agreement terms. The Company issued stock with a fair market value of $36,000 on the date of the agreement in full payment of the stock portion of the settlement agreement.

As of December 31, 2015, out of the cash payments that the Company was responsible for under the settlement agreement, $8,520.82 is still owed and unpaid. This balance due is for part of the February 28, 2012 payment. Plaintiff has the right to get a judgment for $175,000 minus the payments that were made, if we fail to perform under the terms of the settlement agreement and if they serve us with a notice of default, which they have not.

F-9

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), who is also our acting Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of a date as of the end of the reporting period covered by the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, December 31, 2014. For purposes of this section, the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

* Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

* Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

* Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of December 31, 2015 Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, such internal controls over financial reporting were not effective to control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affect our internal controls and that may be considered to be a material weakness. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the registrant's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The matters involving internal controls over financial reporting that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board included the lack of a fully functioning audit committee resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer identified a lack of sufficient internal accounting and book keeping staff and accountability. Because of the Company's severe cash constraints, there are no employees or contractors dedicated solely to the functions of book keeping or accounting. In addition, the Company's current personnel lack sufficient skills, training and experience in the review process in order to ensure the complete and proper application of generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the Company can only afford to retain its outside accountants to review the books and records of the Company on a quarterly basis and in connection with the annual audit of financial statements, whereas more timely and increased periodic reviews would be beneficial to the Company's internal controls over financial reporting pending development of an internal accounting staff. These material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer in connection with the audit of our financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and continue to exist.

In addition, Management has identified the following internal control deficiencies:

We did not have formal policies governing accounting transactions and financial reporting processes;

We did not have a consistent process involving the entry of transactions into the Company's financial recordation system by dedicated personnel;

We did not perform adequate oversight by management of certain accounting functions of our employees and maintained inadequate documentation of management review and approval of accounting transactions and financial reporting processes.

Management is in the process of developing and implementing remediation plans to address its material weaknesses. Management has identified specific remedial actions to address the material weaknesses described above which include:

Augment existing Company resources with additional consultants or employees to improve the recording of accounting transactions. The Company plans to hire additional personnel once the Company has achieved further commercialization of its products and is generating more revenue, or has raised significant additional working capital;

Improve oversight by management by creating a system of periodic and monthly reviews of financial transactions and the recordation of transactions into the Company's financial recordation system;

Adopt an audit committee charter delineating the committee’s duties with respect to the review and oversight of the Company's financial statements, auditors and audit process; and

Retain the services of the Company's outside accountants for periodic and intermittent review of the Company's financial data outside of the quarterly and annual procedures for the preparation of quarterly and annual reports and financial statements, upon the Company obtaining capital or generating additional revenue.

Until such time as we have implemented these remediation plans, there are no assurances that the material weaknesses will not result in errors in our financial statements which could lead to a restatement of those financial statements.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Set forth below are the names, ages, positions and business experience of our directors, executive officers, and key employees as of April 8, 2016:


Name	Age	Position
Jacques Tizabi	44	President, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer, Director, and Secretary

Matin Emouna (1)	45	Director

Tom Sepenzis	45	Director

(1) Member of Audit and Compensation Committees.

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen as our directors or executive officers.

Business Experience

JACQUES TIZABI has been the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of our Company since October 2001, Acting Chief Financial Officer since May 2003 and Secretary since May 2008. Mr. Tizabi spends on average 40-50 hours per week providing services to us. He oversees all material aspects of the Company’s operations.

MATIN EMOUNA has served as a director of our Company since October 2001. Since 1997, Mr. Emouna has maintained his own law practice in New York, where he represents foreign and domestic clients in a broad range of real estate transactions, with emphasis on new constructions, commercial real estate transactions, shopping center development, financing, international business matters, and commercial leasing. He holds B.S. degrees in Business Administration and Spanish from New York State University at Albany and a J.D. from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. His experience in both law and international trade are helpful to the Company.

TOM SEPENZIS became a director of our Company in April of 2009. Mr. Sepenzis worked for over a decade on Wall Street, becoming one of the most highly respected telecommunications analysts, earning the #1 ranking by Forbes magazine one week before his departure. Starting his career as an equities trader at Punk, Ziegel in 1993 he later moved to the firms Soundview Financial (1996), Piper Jaffrey (1998), CIBC World Markets (2000), and Think Equity (2002) as a telecommunications analyst. Switching careers to the entertainment business, he now is the CEO and founder of Ascension Pictures, in which capacity he produces and directs commercials, music videos, documentaries and full length feature films.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Except as set forth below, none of the directors or executive officers have, during the past ten years:

Had any petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law filed by or against, or had a receiver, fiscal agent, or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

Been convicted in a criminal proceeding or a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

Been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

(i)

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

(ii)

Engaging in any type of business practice; or

(iii)

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodities laws;

Been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending, or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in (i) above, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

Been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any federal or state securities law, where the judgment in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

Been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, where the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

(i)

Any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or

(ii)

Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

(iii)

Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

Been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

In May 2005 and in October 2005, respectively the NASD notified Mr. Tizabi that he was suspended and subsequently permanently barred from registering with a broker-dealer.

In 2004, our CEO, Mr. Jacques Tizabi, was a registered representative and principal in an NASD registered broker dealer. In November 2004, Mr. Tizabi decided to leave the brokerage business at which time the broker-dealer filed a Form U-5, Uniform Termination Notice for Securities Industry Registration. Contemporaneously therewith, the NASD was conducting its routine examination of the broker-dealer pursuant to which Mr. Tizabi cooperated by responding to the NASD requests for information. Mr. Tizabi and the broker-dealer were never accused of any wrongdoing and after terminating his relationship with the broker-dealer and leaving the brokerage industry, Mr. Tizabi notified the NASD that he no longer would respond to the NASD in a representative capacity of the broker-dealer. Mr. Tizabi was made aware that his actions could be a violation of Rule 8210 and result in a suspension or bar from further registering with a broker dealer. Mr. Tizabi was suspended and barred because he failed to continue to respond to the NASD’s investigation; not because of any substantive securities violation.

COMMITTEES

Our Audit Committee currently consists of Mr. Matin Emouna. Mr. Emouna is independent within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ listing standards and applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Audit Committee currently does not have a financial expert within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules as management does not believe one is necessary in light of the Company's current stage of product development and sales volume.

Our Compensation Committee determines matters pertaining to the compensation and expense reporting of certain of our executive officers, and administers our stock option, incentive compensation, and employee stock purchase plans. Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Matin Emouna.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which is designed to set the standards of business conduct and ethics and help directors and employees resolve ethical issues. The Code applies to all directors and employees, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and other persons performing similar functions. The Code covers topics including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of information, fair dealing with customers, supplies and competitors, and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The purpose of the Code is to ensure to the greatest possible extent that our business is conducted in a consistently legal and ethical manner. Upon written request to the Company, we will provide a copy of the Code free of charge. Any such request should be directed to the Company at the address set forth on the cover page of this annual report.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership, and reports of changes in ownership, of our common stock and other equity securities of ours. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of copies of the Section 16(a) reports filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we believe our executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following executive compensation disclosure reflects all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the executive officers below for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The following table summarizes all compensation for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 received by our Chief Executive Officer. No executive officer earned in excess of $100,000 in fiscal year 2015.


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compen-sation Earnings ($)	All Other Compen-sation ($)	Total ($)
Jacques Tizabi, President, CEO, Acting CFO	2015	$60,000	--	--	--	--	--	--	$60,000

Jacques Tizabi, President, CEO, Acting CFO	2014	$87,943	--	--	--	--	--	--	$87,943

The salary amounts listed in the table above were not paid, but are accrued.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding as of December 31, 2015:


Option Awards Stock Awards
Name	Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Exercisable	Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Unexercisable	Equity incentive plan awards: number of securities underlying unexercised earned options (#)	Option exercise price ($)	Option expiration date	Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)	Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($)	Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units, or other rights that have not vested (#)	Equity incentive plan awards: market or payout value of unearned shares, units, or other rights that have not vested ($)
-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

All option awards listed above were fully vested as of December 31, 2010.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes the compensation paid by us to our directors during fiscal 2015.

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2014


Name	Fees earned or paid in cash ($)	Stock awards ($)	Option awards ($)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)	Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)	All other compensation ($)	Total ($)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)
Jacques Tizabi (1)
Matin Emouna
Tom Sepenzis (2)

1) All compensation received by Mr. Tizabi in fiscal year 2015 is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above. Mr. Tizabi received no compensation as a director in fiscal year 2015.

2) Mr. Sepenzis received no compensation as a director in fiscal year 2015.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

We have an employment agreement with Jacques Tizabi. Mr. Tizabi's employment agreement, dated as of September 24, 2001, and amended August 23, 2004, provides for Mr. Tizabi to serve as our Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President until December 31, 2010, unless otherwise extended. We have agreed to extend Mr. Tizabi’s employment agreement until December 31, 2015. The employment agreement provides for Mr. Tizabi to receive an annual base salary of $250,000, which is presently suspended, subject to salary increases of 5% per year commencing January 1, 2006. Mr. Tizabi also is entitled to specified perquisites, including participation in any group life, medical, disability and other insurance plans provided by us, use of a luxury automobile approved by the compensation committee (with a maximum cost of $2,500 per month), monthly dues for club memberships not to exceed $1,500 per month, and reimbursement of entertainment expenses provided to our customers, vendors, and strategic partners. To date, Mr. Tizabi has not received any of these specified perquisites.

If Mr. Tizabi's employment is terminated due to his death, the employment agreement provides that we will pay Mr. Tizabi's estate his remaining base salary during the remaining scheduled term of the employment agreement, accelerate the vesting of his options and continue to provide family medical benefits. If Mr. Tizabi's employment is terminated due to his disability, the employment agreement provides that we will pay Mr. Tizabi his remaining base salary during the remaining scheduled term of the employment agreement (reduced by any amounts paid under long-term disability insurance policy maintained by us for the benefit of Mr. Tizabi).

If Mr. Tizabi terminates the employment agreement for cause, if we terminate the employment agreement without cause or in the event of a change of control, in which event the employment of Mr. Tizabi terminates automatically, we will pay Mr. Tizabi his remaining base salary during the remaining scheduled term of the employment agreement and an amount based on his past bonuses and continue to provide specified benefits and perquisites.

If Mr. Tizabi terminates the employment agreement without cause or we terminate the employment agreement for cause, Mr. Tizabi is entitled to receive all accrued and unpaid salary and other compensation and all accrued and unused vacation and sick pay.

If any of the payments due Mr. Tizabi upon termination qualifies as "excess parachute payments" under the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Tizabi also is entitled to an additional payment to cover the tax consequences associated with these excess parachute payments.

Mr. Tizabi has agreed that he will defer payment of all accrued but unpaid bonus or salary, or other compensation payable to him in excess of $150,000 per year, beginning in 2005 until future years. In 2009, Mr. Tizabi received the following as a reduction of the accrual of his unpaid bonus or salary since 2005: 6,369 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of $392,160 on the date of issuance along with cash payments or payments made by the Company on behalf of Mr. Tizabi totaling $158,257. On August 1, 2011, we issued 25,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Tizabi in exchange for the conversion and in-full satisfaction of previously accrued but unpaid salary owed to Mr. Tizabi in the amount of $200,000. On February 13, 2012, we issued 385,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Tizabi in exchange for the conversion and in-full satisfaction of (i) previously accrued but unpaid salary owed to Mr. Tizabi in the amount of $450,000 and (ii) $320,000 in principal and interest outstanding under certain notes payable by the Company to Mr. Tizabi.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2015, relating to the ownership of our common and preferred stock, by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of each class of our capital stock, (ii) each of our directors and nominees, (iii) each of our named executive officers and (iv) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Except as may be indicated in the footnotes to the table and subject to applicable community property laws, each person has the sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares owned. The address of each person listed is in care of Universal Detection Technology, 340 N. Camden Drive, Suite 302, Beverly Hills, California 90210.


Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)	Percent of Class (1)

Jacques Tizabi, President, CEO, Acting CFO, Director	802,372 (2)	53.4%
Matin Emouna, Director	30,030	2.0%
Tom Sepenzis, Director	0	0
All directors and executive officers as a group (3 members)	832,402	55.4%

(1) Under Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by that person (and only that person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership with respect to the number of shares of our common stock actually outstanding at April 15, 2013. As of May 1, 2013, we had 1,502,284 common shares, no par value, outstanding.

(2) Includes 2 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of fully vested options.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

Set forth in the table below is information regarding awards made through equity compensation plans through December 31, 2015.


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercises of outstanding options, warrants, and rights (a)	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights (b)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	N/A	N/A	N/A

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
2006 Stock Compensation Plan	2 (2)	N/A	0
2006 Consultant Stock Plan	6 (2)	N/A	0
2006-II Consultant Stock Plan	9(2)	N/A	0
2007 Consultant Stock Plan	19	N/A	0
2007 Equity Incentive Plan II&III	15 (2)(3)	N/A	0
2007 Equity Incentive Plan IV	22	N/A	0
2007 Equity Incentive Plan V & VI	67(4)	N/A	0
2008 Equity Incentive Plan	75	N/A	0
2008 Equity Incentive Plan II	33	N/A	0
2008 Equity Incentive Plan III	125	N/A	0
2008 Equity Incentive Plan IV	190	N/A	0
2009 Equity Incentive Plan	500	N/A	0
2009 Equity Incentive Plan II	3,000	N/A	20
2009 Equity Incentive Plan III	10,000	N/A	0
2011 Equity Incentive Plan	30.000	N/A	0
2011 Equity Incentive Plan II	60	N/A	0

1) The Company has individual compensation arrangements with Messrs. Amir Ettehadieh and Nima Montazeri. Under these arrangements Messrs. Ettehadieh and Montazeri help the company with matters related to research, business development, and administration. For their services, Messrs. Ettehadieh and Montazeri receive the equivalent of $10,000 worth of common shares of the Company per month, which shares are issued under the then-current equity incentive plan, including those plans listed above.

2) Represents total number of shares of common stock originally authorized for stock grants. Stock option grants were not authorized.

3) Consists of the second and third plans.

4) Consists of the fifth and sixth plans.

On February 13, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan authorizes common stock grants to our non-executive employees, professional advisors and consultants. We reserved 7,500,000 shares of our common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. The Plan is to be administered by our Board of Directors, or by any committee to which such duties are delegated by the Board.

On June 29, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Consultant Stock Plan (the "2006 Plan"). The 2006 Plan authorizes common stock grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. We reserved 25,000,000 shares of our common stock for awards to be made under the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan is to be administered by a committee of one or more members of our Board of Directors.

On November 22, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006-II Consultant Stock Plan (the "2006-II Plan"). The 2006-II Plan authorizes common stock grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. We reserved 37,500,000 shares of our common stock for awards to be made under the 2006-II Plan. The 2006-II Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On April 17, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Consultant Stock Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. We reserved 375,000 shares of our common stock for awards to be made under the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On June 5, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007-II Plan”). The 2007-II Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 150,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the 2007-II Plan. The 2007-II Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or members of the Board of Directors.

On June 27, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007-III Plan”). The 2007-III Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 145,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the 2007-III Plan. The 2007-III Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or members of the Board of Directors.

On July 13, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007-2 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007-IV Plan”). The 2007-IV Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 450,000 shares of our common stock for awards to be made under the 2007-IV Plan. The 2007-IV Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors.

On October 10, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007-3 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007-V Plan”). The 2007-V Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 600,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2007-V Plan. The 2007-V Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On November 1, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007-4 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007-VI Plan”). The 2007-VI Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 750,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2007-VI Plan. The 2007-VI Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On February 11, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”). The 2008 Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 1,500,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2008 Plan. The 2008 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On April 29, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan II (the “2008-II Plan”). The 2008-II Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 1,650,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2008-III Plan. The 2008-II Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On July 1, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan III (the “2008-III Plan”). The 2008-III Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 2,500,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2008-III Plan. The 2008-III Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On September 2, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan IV (the “2008-IV Plan”). The 2008-IV Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 3,800,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2008-IV Plan. The 2008-IV Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On February 22, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). The 2009 Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 10,000,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On May 14, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan II (the “2009-II Plan”). The 2009-II Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 60,000,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2009-II Plan. The 2009-II Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On November 5, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan III (the “2009-III Plan”). The 2009-III Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 200,000,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2009-III Plan. The 2009-III Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On May 6, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”). The 2011 Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 600,000,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

On October 27, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan II (the “2011-II Plan”). The 2011-II Plan grants to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 1,200,000,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the 2011-II Plan. The 2011-II Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of our Board of Directors.

With respect to each of the above Plans, and subject to the provisions of each Plan, the Board and/or committee shall have authority to (a) grant, in its discretion, stock awards; (b) determine in good faith the fair market value of the stock covered by any grant; (c) determine which eligible persons shall receive grants and the number of shares, restrictions, terms and conditions to be included in such grants; (d) construe and interpret the Plans; (e) promulgate, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to its administration, and correct defects, omissions and inconsistencies in the Plans or any grants; (f) consistent with the Plans and with the consent of the participant, amend any outstanding grant; and (g) make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the Plans’ administration. The interpretation and construction by the Board of any provisions of the Plans shall be conclusive and final.

CHANGE IN CONTROL

We are not aware of any arrangement that might result in a change in control in the future.

Described below are certain transactions or series of transactions since January 1, 2010 between us and our executive officers, directors and the beneficial owners of five percent or more of our common stock, on an as converted basis, and certain persons affiliated with or related to these persons, including family members, in which they had or will have a direct or indirect material interest in an amount that exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, other than compensation arrangements that are otherwise required to be described under “Executive Compensation.”

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company borrowed a total of $-0- and $135,432 respectively from Mr. Tizabi, its president and chief executive officer, under various written and oral promissory note agreements executed by the Company. The notes had interest rates of 0%.

Director Independence

Mr. Matin Emouna and Mr. Tom Sepenzis are independent directors as that term is defined by NYSE Rule 303A.02(a). The Company currently does not have a nominating/corporate governance committee. Of the members of the Company’s board of directors, Messrs. Matin Emouna and Tom Sepenzis meet the NYSE’s independence standards for members of such committees and Mr. Jacques Tizabi does not meet the NYSE’s independence requirements for members of such committees.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional audit services and other services renin the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.


	Year Ended December 31, 2015		Year Ended December 31, 2014

Audit Fees	$	-		-
Audit-Related Fees (quarterly reports)		-		-
Tax Fees		-		-
All Other Fees		-		-
	$	-		-

Audit Fees — This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees — This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” The services for the fees disclosed under this category include consultation regarding our correspondence with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other accounting consulting.

Tax Fees — This category consists of professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice. The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.

All Other Fees — This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.

Our Board of Directors has adopted a procedure for pre-approval of all fees charged by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the procedure, the Board approves the engagement letter with respect to audit, tax and review services. Other fees are subject to pre-approval by the Board, or, in the period between meetings, by a designated member of Board. Any such approval by the designated member is disclosed to the entire Board at the next meeting. The audit and tax fees paid to the auditors with respect to 2012 were pre-approved by the Board of Directors.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(a) Documents filed as a part of this report:

Financial Statements

Financial Statement Schedules

Not required.

(b) Exhibits:

Exhibit

No.

Description

3.1(a)

Articles of Incorporation of Universal Detection Technology (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2011).

3.1(b)

June 29, 2012 Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 11, 2012).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on May 10, 2012).

4.1+

Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005).

4.2+

2006 Stock Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on February 13, 2006).

4.3+

2006 Consultant Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on June 30, 2006).

4.4+

2006-II Consultant Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on November 22, 2006).

4.5+

2007 Consultant Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on April 17, 2007).

4.6+

2007 Equity Incentive Plan (effective May 30, 2007) (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on June 6, 2007).

4.7+

2007 Equity Incentive Plan (effective June 21, 2007) (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on June 27, 2007).

4.8+

2007-2 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on July 13, 2007).

4.9+

2007-3 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on October 2, 2007).

4.10+

2007-4 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on November 2, 2007).

4.11+

2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on February 11, 2008).

4.12+

2008 Equity Incentive Plan II (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on May 27, 2008).

4.13+

2008 Equity Incentive Plan III (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on July 11, 2008).

4.14+

2008 Equity Incentive Plan IV (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on September 8, 2008).

4.15+

2009 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on February 23, 2009).

4.16+

2009 Equity Incentive Plan II (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on May 15, 2009).

4.17+

2009 Equity Incentive Plan III (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on November 6, 2009).

4.18+

2011 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-174010) filed on May 6, 2011).

4.19+

2011 Equity Incentive Plan II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-177555) filed on October 27, 2011

10.1+

Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Jacques Tizabi dated September 25, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2002, filed on May 20, 2002).

10.2+

Amendment to Employment Agreement of Jacques Tizabi, dated August 23, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004, filed on November 22, 2004).

10.3

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 20, 2009)

10.4

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009)

10.5

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2009)

10.6

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2010)

10.7

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 24, 2010)

10.8

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 23, 2010)

10.9

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 19, 2010)

10.10

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on April 15, 2011).

10.11

Commercial Property Lease dated June 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Company’s Amended Annual Report on form 10-K/A filed on November 17, 2010)

10.12

Agreement with Morphix Technologies dated March 8, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on April 15, 2011).

10.13

Agreement with Mirion Technologies (MPGI), Inc. dated February 22, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on April 15, 2011).

10.14

Agreement Advnt Biotechnologies, LLC Value Added Reseller (VAR) Agreement dated September 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on April 15, 2011).

10.15

Agreement with Detrick Lawrence Corporation dated April 7, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on April 15, 2011).

10.16

Agency Agreement with APP Systems Services PTE LTD dated March 15, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on April 15, 2011).

10.17

Form of Debt Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, filed on May 20, 2011).

10.18

Form of Note Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2011).

10.19

Form of Note Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, filed on August 22, 2011).

10.20

Form of Note Conversion Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, filed on November 16, 2011).

14.1

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics*.

21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 31, 2004).

31.1

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*.

32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*.

101.INS

XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT**

101.SCH

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA**

101.CAL

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE**

101.DEF

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE**

101.LAB

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE**

101.PRE

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE**

----------------------------

+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

* Filed herewith.

** In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-formatted interactive data files that comprise Exhibit 101 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed”.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: April 8, 2016	UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY

By:	/s/ Jacques Tizabi
	Jacques Tizabi, President, Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jacques Tizabi, his attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming said attorney-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Date: April 8, 2016	/s/ Jacques Tizabi
	Jacques Tizabi, President, Chief Executive
	Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer)

Date: April 8, 2016	/s/ Tom Sepenzis
	Tom Sepenzis, Director

Date: April 8, 2016	/s/ Matin Emouna
	Matin Emouna, Director

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY 10-K