UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

____________________________

FORM 10-Q

X . QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: March ~~September 30~~31, ~~2014~~2015

. TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ~~__________~~___ to ~~__________~~____

Commission File Number 001-09327

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY ~~(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)~~

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


California		95-2746949
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

340 North Camden Drive, Suite 302 Beverly Hills, California		90210
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number: (310) 248-3655

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes . No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer .	Accelerated filer .
Non-accelerated filer . (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes . No X .

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015, there were 1,500,~~536~~326 shares of common stock outstanding.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

			Page No.	~~Page No.~~
PART I.	Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited) :	3	3
		Notes to Financial Statements	6	7
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12	13
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	16	18
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	16	18
PART II.	Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	17	19
	Item 1A	Risk Factors	17	19
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	17	19
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	17	19
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	17	20
	Item 5.	Other Information	18	20
	Item 6.	Exhibits	18	20
SIGNATURES			19	22

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2013~~2015 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2012~~2014

(UNAUDITED)

	As of
	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~2,165~~100	$	~~2,074~~$	100
Accounts Receivable, net		1,099		~~1,099~~	1,099
Other Receivable		~~20,836~~-		~~22,500~~	-
Inventory		5158,~~879~~887		~~999~~	58,887
Total current assets		7560,~~979~~086		~~26,672~~	60,086
Deposits		21,300		~~21,300~~	21,300
Equipment, net		2,262		~~2,485~~	2,262
Total assets	$	9983,~~541~~648	$	~~50,457~~$	83,648
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable, trade	$	1,~~155~~332,~~843~~269	$	~~1,219,614~~$	1,319,744
Accrued liabilities		~~660~~653,~~730~~873		~~619,981~~	653,873
Unearned revenue		~~7,530~~-		~~5,075~~	-
Accrued payroll - officers		~~829~~883,~~037~~259		~~775,481~~	873,259
Notes payable - related party		~~117~~135,~~389~~432		~~11,867~~	135,432
Notes payable		~~308~~500,~~615~~097		~~550,375~~	500,097
Accrued interest expense		12,~~887~~016,~~407~~783		~~1,898,153~~	1,991,781
Total current liabilities		45,~~966~~521,~~551~~713		~~5,080,546~~	5,474,186
Long term notes payable		~~481~~167,~~500~~175		~~167,175~~	167,175
Total liabilities		5,~~448~~688,~~051~~888		~~5,247,721~~	5,641,361
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued and outstanding		−-		−	-
Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000,000 shares authorized,1,500,326 and 1,222,954 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		39,742,528		39,590,889
Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000,000 shares authorized, 1,500,326 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		39,742,528			39,742,528
Additional paid-in-capital		5,~~631~~613,089		~~5,613,089~~	5,613,089
Accumulated deficit		(50,~~722~~960,~~127~~857)		~~(50,401,242)~~	(50,913,300)
Total stockholders' deficit		(5,~~348~~605,~~510~~240)		~~(5,197,264)~~	(5,557,713)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	9983,~~541~~648	$	~~50,457~~$	83,648

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2013~~2015 AND ~~2012~~2014

(UNAUDITED)

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	For the three months ended March 31,
	2013		2012
	2015			2014
REVENUE, NET	$	~~87,927~~-	$	~~70,716~~$	1,883
COST OF GOODS SOLD		~~7,352~~-		~~56,299~~	-
GROSS PROFIT		~~80,575~~-		~~14,417~~	1,883
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative		~~214~~22,~~047~~525		~~939,083~~	24,519
Marketing		−-		~~9,470~~	-
Depreciation and amortization		~~668~~-		~~3,059~~	222
Total operating expenses		~~214~~22,~~047~~525		~~951,612~~	24,741
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(~~134~~22,~~140~~525)		~~(973,195)~~	(22,858)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense		(7525,~~006~~002)		~~(116,506)~~	(25,002)
Other income		−-		−	-
Loss on settlement of debt		~~(111,739)~~-		~~(110,446)~~	-
Total other expenses		(~~186~~25,~~745~~002)		~~(226,952)~~	(25,002)
NET LOSS	$	(~~320~~47,~~885~~527)	$	~~(1,164,147)~~$	(47860)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:	$	(0.~~2138~~3168)	$	~~(1.381)~~$	(0.3189)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING		1,500,~~536~~326		~~217,079~~	1,500,326

Weighted average number of dilutive securities has not been calculated as the effect of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012

(UNAUDITED)

	For the three months ended September 30,
	2013		2012
REVENUE, NET	$	51,053	$	14,532
COST OF GOODS SOLD		3,312		11,154
GROSS PROFIT		47,741		3,378
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative		71,382		348,928
Marketing		−		−
Depreciation and amortization		223		2,641
Total operating expenses		71,605		351,569
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(23,864)		(348,191)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense		(25,002)		(49,818)
Other income		−		−
Loss on settlement of debt		−		−
Total other expenses		(25,002)		(49,818)
NET LOSS	$	(48,866)	$	(398,009)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:	$	(0.0326)	$	(0.4187)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING		1,500,536		950,471

Weighted average number of dilutive securities has not been calculated as the effect of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2013~~2015 AND ~~2012~~2014

(UNAUDITED)

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	For the three months ended March 31,
	2013		2012
	2015			2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(~~320~~47,~~885~~527)	$	~~(1,164,347)~~$	(47,860)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Stocks issued for services		−-		~~397,321~~	-
Loss on settlement of debt		−-		~~110,446~~	-
Depreciation		~~667~~-		~~667~~	222
Amortization of note discount and loan fees		−-		~~15,954~~	-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Inventory		~~(100)~~-		~~27,491~~	-
Unearned Revenue		~~2,455~~-		~~(6,803)~~	(1,883)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		~~176~~47,~~196~~527		~~376,716~~	44,426
Net cash used in operating activities		~~(141,667)~~-		~~(242,555)~~	(5,095)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment		−-		−	-
Net cash used in investing activities		−-		−	-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes with beneficial conversion and warrants				100,000
Common stock subscriptions		-			-
Proceeds from notes payable-related party		~~146,453~~-		~~212,934~~	-
(Payments on)/proceeds from notes payable		~~(4,683)~~-		~~290,000~~	-
Payments on notes payable - related party		−-		~~(359,804)~~	-
Net cash provided by financing activities		~~141,770~~-		~~243,130~~	-
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		103		575
NET INCREASE/DECREASE IN CASH		-			(5,095)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		~~2,062~~100		~~2,062~~	5,195
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	~~2,165~~100	$	~~2,637~~$	100
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income tax	$	−-	$	−$	-
Interest Paid	$	−-	$	~~1,769~~$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES FOR NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Shares issued for settlement of debt and accrued interest	$	−-	$	~~141,071~~$	-
Shares issued for settlement of debt and accrued payroll - related party	$	−-	$	~~770,000~~$	-
Shares issued for loan fees	$	−-	$	~~19,136~~$	-

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Universal Detection Technology, a California corporation, primarily designs, manufactures and markets air pollution monitoring instruments. Beginning in 2002, the Company has focused its research and development efforts in developing a real time biological weapon detection device. To accelerate development of its initial biological weapon detection device, the Company has developed and is implementing a collaborative partnering strategy. Under this strategy, the Company identifies and partners with researchers and developers. The Company has expanded its services to include security related consulting, event security and counterterrorism training.

The Company is a reseller of a range of products, which include rapid anthrax detection test kits, training courses for first responders, event security, threat evaluation and consulting, radiation detection systems, anti-microbial products, and DVDs aimed at providing information and training regarding combating terrorism and managing emergency situations.

NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Principles

In the opinion of management, the accompanying balance sheets and related interim statements of income, and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with information included in the Company’s ~~2012~~2013 Form 10-K filed on February 20, 2015 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of Universal Detection Technology and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Nutek, Inc. (“Nutek”) and Logan Medical Devices, Inc. (“Logan”). The two subsidiaries are currently inactive. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current year presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued amended standards to simplify how entities test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment which improve consistency in impairment testing requirements among long-lived asset categories. These amended standards permit an assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. For assets in which this assessment concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value is more than its carrying value, these amended standards eliminate the requirement to perform quantitative impairment testing as outlined in the previously issued standards. These amended standards are effective for us beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012; however, early adoption is permitted. We do not expect these new standards to significantly impact our consolidated condensed financial statements.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. The new guidance provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that this is the case, it is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit (if any). If an entity determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. The new guidance will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2012. We do not expect the adoption will have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Instead, an entity will be required to present either a continuous statement of net income and other comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2012 and will have financial statement presentation changes only. We do not expect the adoption will have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.

NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $50,~~722~~960,~~127~~857 as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015, including a net loss of $~~320~~47,~~885~~527 during the ~~nine~~three-month ~~months~~ period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to develop additional sources of capital and ultimately achieve profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

Management has taken certain steps to provide the Company with necessary capital to continue its operations. These steps include: 1) actively seeking additional funding in the form of unsecured indebtedness and 2) seeking to increase revenues from product sales.

NOTE 4. NOTES PAYABLE

~~During~~As ~~the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, the Company borrowed an aggregate~~ of ~~$178,883~~March ~~from third parties under various promissory note agreements. The promissory notes all bear interest at 12.0% per annum~~31, ~~and are due on or before February 21,~~ 2015. ~~No principal or interest payments have been made on these notes. As of September 30, 2013~~ and December 31, ~~2012~~2014, the Company had total notes payable amounting to $~~971~~802,~~882~~704 and $~~753~~802,~~139~~704 respectively~~, net of loan fees of $56,693 and $0 respectively~~.

The interest expense on these notes payable for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2015 and ~~the year ended~~ December 31, ~~2012~~2014 amounted to $7525,~~006~~002 and $~~116~~100,~~506~~008, respectively.

~~NOTE 5. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS~~7

Issuance of Common Stock

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 277,552 shares of common stock to Asher Enterprises under terms of convertible notes held by Asher Enterprises, Inc.

During 2012, the Company entered into various agreements to convert $28,125 of principal and $2,500 of accrued interest into 35,268 shares of common stock. The fair market value of the stock on the dates of agreement and issuance was $141,071. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $110,446.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

~~During~~NOTE ~~the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 196,110 shares of its common stock to various employees of the Company as compensation~~5. EQUITY The shares were valued at a total of $390,815. A total of 225,000 shares of its common stock were issued to the Company’s president and CEO. The fair market value of the shares issued to the Company’s president and CEO was $450,000.TRANSACTIONS

~~During~~Issuance the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company entered into various agreements for strategic business planning, financial advisory, investor relations, and professional and public relations services. As compensation for the services rendered, the Company issued 158,225 shares of ~~common~~Common ~~stock, valued at $112,905, the fair market value of the stock on the day of issuance.~~Stock

InDuring ~~addition to~~ the ~~above~~three-month ~~issuances,~~period ~~the~~ended ~~Company~~March ~~also~~31, ~~issued~~2015 ~~160,000~~and ~~shares~~for ofthe ~~common~~three ~~stock~~period toended ~~its~~March ~~president~~31, ~~and~~2014, ~~CEO~~the ~~for~~Company ~~payment~~did ofnot ~~outstanding~~issue ~~debt,~~any ~~during~~shares ~~2012,~~of ~~valued~~its atcommon ~~$320,000~~stock.

Stock Split

A majority of shareholders approved a resolution providing the Company’s Board of Directors with the authority to effect a one-for-twenty-thousand (1:20,000) reverse stock split for stockholders of record as of March 13, 2012. The reverse took effect July 5, 2012 which resulted in 919,173 shares outstanding.

Stock Options

On February 11, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 15,000 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 15,000 shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On April 29, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-2 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 16,500 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 16,342 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On July 1, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-3 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 125 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 125 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On September 2, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-4 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 190 shares of common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 190 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

9On February 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan.”) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are no it connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transactions. The company initially reserved 500 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 500 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On May 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009-2 Equity Incentive Plan (The “Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 3,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 2,980 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

On February 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan.”) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are no it connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transactions. The company initially reserved 500 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 500 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On November 6, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009-3 Equity Incentive Plan (The “Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 10,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 10,000 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

On May 6, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (The “Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 30,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 30,000 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

On October 27, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (The “2011-II Plan”.) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 60,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 60,000 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES

Our effective tax rates were approximately (0.0)% and (0.0)% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2015 and ~~2011~~2014, respectively. Our effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate due to, net operating loss carry-forwards available to offset current and future taxable income.

109

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company was involved in the following litigations:

a) On May 15, 2002, Walt Disney World Co. commenced action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company and a former wholly-owned subsidiary (WALT DISNEY WORLD CO. V. POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORP. AND DASIBI ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. (Case No. BC 274013 Los Angeles Superior Court) for amounts due in connection with unpaid rent. A judgment was entered for $411,500. No amounts have been paid in connection with the judgment. As of June 30, 2012, $411,500 has been accrued. b) A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose and Mark Rose v. Universal Detection Technology, Pollution Research and Control Corporation (Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, North Central District, Case No. EC042040) On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the Company (Case No. EC 038824) for amounts allegedly due pursuant to four unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the “Agreement”). On December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced the above-referenced action against the Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and seeking approximately $205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11, 2006. The Company has accrued for this settlement. The Company entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these three parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, the Company was required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. The Company did not make this payment and are in default of these notes. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has $668,183 and $661,929, respectively, accrued for including interest relating to this matter which is part of notes payable and accrued interest in the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. c) On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (Trilogy Capital Partners v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. SC089929) against the Company. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleged damages against UDT for breach of an engagement letter in the amount of $93,449. Also, Plaintiff alleged that UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written agreement. After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting extensive mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000 until a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was fully paid. In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against UDT. As of September 30, 2011, $28,098 was due under the agreement and is included in the accounts payable in the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2012. d) On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. BC361979) against the Company. NBGI, Inc.’s Complaint alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of $111,014 plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. No payments have been made on this judgment and no actions to enforce the judgment have been taken against UDT. e) On June 24, 2010, Plaintiff Meyers Associates, L.P. commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled Meyers Associates, L.P. v. Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"), case No. 108321/10. The complaint alleges breach of contract and damages related to performance by Meyers Associates, L.P. ("Meyers") of an investment banking services agreement dated December 22, 2005 and UDT's alleged failure to compensate Meyers for such services under the terms of the agreement. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of approximately $116,000 plus an award of court costs and attorneys’ fees. In October 2010, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion for Default Judgment against UDT and filed a Request for Judicial Intervention in connection therewith. The Company has not received any further communication regarding this action and does not know if a default judgment was granted.

On May 15, 2002, Walt Disney World Co. commenced action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company and a former wholly-owned subsidiary (WALT DISNEY WORLD CO. V. POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORP. AND DASIBI ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. (Case No. BC 274013 Los Angeles Superior Court) for amounts due in connection with unpaid rent. A judgment was entered for $411,500. No amounts have been paid in connection with the judgment. As of June 30, 2012, $411,500 has been accrued.10

A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose and Mark Rose v. Universal Detection Technology, Pollution Research and Control Corporation (Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, North Central District, Case No. EC042040)

On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the Company (Case No. EC 038824) for amounts allegedly due pursuant to four unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the “Agreement”). On December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced the above-referenced action against the Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and seeking approximately $205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11, 2006. The Company has accrued for this settlement. The Company entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these three parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, the Company was required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. The Company did not make this payment and are in default of these notes. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company has $636,275 and $610,621, respectively, accrued for including interest relating to this matter which is part of notes payable and accrued interest in the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (Trilogy Capital Partners v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. SC089929) against the Company. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleged damages against UDT for breach of an engagement letter in the amount of $93,449. Also, Plaintiff alleged that UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written agreement. After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting extensive mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000 until a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was fully paid. In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against UDT. As of September 30, 2011, $28,098 was due under the agreement and is included in the accounts payable in the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2012.

On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. BC361979) against the Company. NBGI, Inc.’s Complaint alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of $111,014 plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. No payments have been made on this judgment and no actions to enforce the judgment have been taken against UDT.

On June 24, 2010, Plaintiff Meyers Associates, L.P. commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled Meyers Associates, L.P. v. Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"), case No. 108321/10. The complaint alleges breach of contract and damages related to performance by Meyers Associates, L.P. ("Meyers") of an investment banking services agreement dated December 22, 2005 and UDT's alleged failure to compensate Meyers for such services under the terms of the agreement. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of approximately $116,000 plus an award of court costs and attorneys fees. In October 2010, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion for Default Judgment against UDT and filed a Request for Judicial Intervention in connection therewith. The Company has not received any further communication regarding this action and does not know if a default judgment was granted.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

f) On November 1, 2010 the accounting firm of A.J. Robbins, P.C. filed a lawsuit in the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado, seeking recovery of fees allegedly owed for accounting services performed during 2004 to 2008. The claims have been asserted against the Company, a second corporate defendant, and our CEO, as a result of a personal guarantee. On December 15, 2010, Defendants filed an Answer which asserted several defenses. The parties have exchanged initial disclosures, and the matter has been set for trial commencing on December 5, 2011. On August 3, 2011 the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Defendants in the case will jointly pay $85,000 to the plaintiffs and the Company will issue $45,000 of the Company’s stock to the plaintiffs. The cash payments will be made in equal monthly payments over 7 months commencing on August 31, 2011. In consideration of the settlement, the parties have executed a mutual release and have agreed to withdraw the lawsuit. The releases and withdrawal are contingent upon the Company's full performance of the settlement agreement terms. The Company issued stock with a fair market value of $36,000 on the date of the agreement in full payment of the stock portion of the settlement agreement. As of March 31, 2015, out of the cash payments that the Company was responsible for under the settlement agreement, $8,520.82 is still owed and unpaid. This balance due is for part of the February 28, 2012 payment. Plaintiff has the right to get a judgment for $175,000 minus the payments that were made, if we fail to perform under the terms of the settlement agreement and if they serve us with a notice of default, which they have not.

On November 1, 2010 the accounting firm of A.J. Robbins, P.C. filed a lawsuit in the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado, seeking recovery of fees allegedly owed for accounting services performed during 2004 to 2008. The claims have been asserted against the Company, a second corporate defendant, and our CEO, as a result of a personal guarantee. On December 15, 2010, Defendants filed an Answer which asserted several defenses. The parties have exchanged initial disclosures, and the matter has been set for trial commencing on December 5, 2011. On August 3, 2011 the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Defendants in the case will jointly pay $85,000 to the plaintiffs and the Company will issue $45,000 of the Company’s stock to the plaintiffs. The cash payments will be made in equal monthly payments over 7 months commencing on August 31, 2011. In consideration of the settlement, the parties have executed a mutual release and have agreed to withdraw the lawsuit. The releases and withdrawal are contingent upon the Company's full performance of the settlement agreement terms. The Company issued stock with a fair market value of $36,000 on the date of the agreement in full payment of the stock portion of the settlement agreement.11

As of November 16, 2012, out of the cash payments that the Company was responsible for under the settlement agreement, $8,520.82 is still owed and unpaid. This balance due is for part of the February 28, 2012 payment. Plaintiff has the right to get a judgment for $175,000 minus the payments that were made, if we fail to perform under the terms of the settlement agreement and if they serve us with a notice of default, which they have not.

NOTE 8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 225,000 shares of common stock to its president and CEO to convert $450,000 of accrued but unpaid salary to him.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $212,934 in principal with no interest due and repaid $679,804 in principal and $1,768 in interest payments to its president and CEO. A total of $359,804 was repaid in cash and $320,000 was repaid through the issuance of 160,000 shares of its common stock. As of September 30, 2012, no principal and in interest were due.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the following management’s discussion and analysis, and other reports filed by the registrant from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (collectively the “filings”) contain forward-looking statements which are intended to convey our expectations or predictions regarding the occurrence of possible future events or the existence of trends and factors that may impact our future plans and operating results. These forward-looking statements are derived, in part, from various assumptions and analyses we have made in the context of our current business plan and information currently available to us and in light of our experience and perceptions of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate in the circumstances. You can generally identify forward-looking statements through words and phrases such as “seek”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “budget”, “project”, “may be”, “may continue”, “may likely result”, and similar expressions. When reading any forward-looking statement you should remain mindful that all forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain as they are based on current expectations and assumptions concerning future events or future performance of our company, and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors relating to our industry and results of operations.

Each forward-looking statement should be read in context with, and with an understanding of, the various other disclosures concerning our company and our business made in our filings. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a prediction of actual results or developments. We are not obligated to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this report to reflect new events or circumstances unless and to the extent required by applicable law.

OVERVIEW

Universal Detection Technology (the "Company," “UDT” or "We") is engaged in the marketing and resale of detection devices for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) threats. Through agreements with various third parties we supply bioterrorism detection kits capable of detecting anthrax, ricin, botulinum, plague, and SEBs, mold detection kits, chemical detection equipment, radiation detection systems, and counter-terrorism training references.

We have entered into supply and distribution agreements with various parties enabling us to supply a host of products and services for detection of hazardous materials and training references. By combining our in-house experience and knowledge and outside expertise offered by various consultants and third parties, we have added threat evaluation and consulting services, and training courses to our services. We sell and market security and counter-terrorism products including bioterrorism detection kits, chemical detectors, radiation detection systems, and training references. Some of the products and services we offer have not been sold to date and there is no guarantee that any of them will be demanded and sold in the market in the future. We plan to continue expanding our product base and intend to sell products to more users inside and outside the U.S. Our strategy is to generate sales by enhancing our web presence and marketing the Company as a supplier of complete CBRNE detection equipment. We plan to attend various industry trade shows and to offer products in certain training scenarios so that first responders can become more familiar with our products. Our target customer markets primarily consist of first responders with some emphasis on the bioterror and military defense market. Our geographical customer focus is on the U.S., Europe, and Asia. There is no guarantee that we will succeed in implementing this strategy or if implemented, that this strategy will be successful.

Subsequent to the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan, we saw an increased demand in our radiation detection equipment. In response we formed new alliances with manufacturers of dosimeters and survey meters to supply the Japanese market. We witnessed increased sales of these systems and have shipped several units to Japanese customers since the disaster.

In late 2011 we started research and development on a new line of radiation detectors that can monitor the environment and surfaces for radiation and communicate the results with a smartphone enabling the user to save and share the test results instantaneously. In December 2011 we announced entering into an agreement with Honeywell India (a unit of Honeywell International) to develop a radiation detector which would display radiation data collected via Bluetooth to a smartphone. The product is designed to detect radiation levels on surfaces and food and to automatically send the collected data to a smartphone. According to the agreement with Honeywell, any and all intellectual property including any patents which may be filed will be the sole property of Universal Detection Technology.

1312

We named this product RadSmart and we expect to bring it to the market in 2012. In March 2012, we applied for a Federal Trademark for RadSmart with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). We have received confirmation that the USPTO has received our application and has subsequently assigned a serial number to our submission. In March 2012, the USPTO has informed us that in approximately 3 months, an examining attorney will review our application to determine if all legal requirements are met. Currently our mark is not registered and is considered a “pending” application. The overall process from the time of initial filing to registration or final refusal can take 13-18 months or even longer.

RadSmart utilizes a Hamamatsu Cesium Iodide (CsI) scintillator for the detection of Gamma rays. Cs(I) scintillators are the most sensitive detection mechanisms for detecting Gamma radiation. The instrument will be sensitive enough to measure normal radiation levels to 100 to 200 times that intensity. With the planned detection range of 0.001 to 9.999 uSv/h the device is expected to be capable of detecting traces of radiation on surfaces, clothing and in particular food contamination, which has become an increasing concern globally after the Fukushima disaster in Japan.

InFor the ~~third~~three ~~quarter~~month ofperiod ~~2012~~ended weMarch ~~realized~~31, 2015 our revenues of $~~14,532~~ nil from sales. We have incurred losses for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2015 and ~~2011~~2014 in the approximate amounts of $~~397~~47,~~982~~527 and $~~506~~47,~~995~~860, respectively, and have an accumulated deficit of $4950.29 million as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2015. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2015, we were in default on certain debt obligations totaling approximately $~~328~~802,~~240~~704 in addition to accumulated interest of approximately $~~844,000~~2.0 million. We require up to approximately $35.70 million in the next 12 months to repay debt obligations. We do not anticipate that our cash on hand is adequate to meet our operating expenses over the next 12 months. In addition, we do not have adequate capital to repay all of our debt currently due and becoming due in the next 12 months. We principally expect to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities. During the past 12 months, management spent the substantial majority of its time on sales and marketing of the Company’s products and services. These activities diverted management from capital raising activities. We will actively continue to pursue additional equity or debt financing in the coming months, but cannot provide any assurances that it will be successful or on terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to pay our debts as they become due and are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, we will not be able to accomplish any or all of our initiatives and will be forced to consider other alternatives including suspending our business operations.

General and Administrative Expenses; Selling Expenses

During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2015 we spent an aggregate of $~~348~~22,~~928~~525 on ~~selling,~~ general and administrative expenses ~~and marketing expenses~~. This amount represents a ~~22%~~nominal ~~increase~~decrease over the comparable prior year period. The ~~increase~~decrease is principally attributable to ana ~~increase~~decrease in office expenses ~~and professional fees~~.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 we spent an aggregate of $948,553 on selling, general and administrative expenses and marketing expenses. This amount represents a 15% increase over the comparable prior year period. The increase is principally attributable to an increase in office expenses and professional fees.

Working Capital Deficit

Our working ~~capital~~ deficit at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015, was $45,~~890~~461,~~572~~627. This deficit and questions as to our ability to obtain capital raises substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. We will require up to approximately $5.50 million to repay indebtedness in the next 12 months. We can make no assurances that such amount will be available to the Company.

Results of Operations

The following discussion is included to describe our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contain detailed information that should be referred to in conjunction with this discussion.

Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015 Compared to the Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2014.

Revenue. Total revenue for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015 was $51nil,~~053,~~ as compared to revenue of $141,~~532~~883 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, ana ~~increase~~decrease of $361,~~521~~883. The ~~increase~~decrease is primarily due to ~~efforts~~a ~~made~~decrease toin ~~improve~~captured ~~sales~~unearned ~~conditions~~revenue for the comparative periods.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015 were $7122,~~605~~525, as compared to total operating expenses of $~~351~~24,~~569~~741 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2014, representing a decrease of $~~279~~2,~~964~~216. This ~~These~~decrease ~~decreases~~was ~~are principally~~ due to a ~~reduction~~decrease in ~~staff costs,~~ office administrative expenses ~~and professional fees~~.

14Other income (expense). Total other expense amounted to $25,002 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and for the corresponding period of the prior year, which consisted of interest expense for the periods.

~~Other~~Net ~~income (expense)~~loss. Net ~~Total~~loss ~~other expense amounted to $25,002~~ for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015 aswas ~~compared to~~ $4947,~~818~~527, ~~for~~as ~~the~~compared ~~corresponding~~to ~~period of the prior year, representing~~ a ~~decrease~~net loss of $2447,~~816.~~680 ~~The~~for ~~decreased expense is principally related to~~ the ~~loss~~same ~~recognized~~period onin the ~~settlement~~prior offiscal ~~shares issued for debt for the period ended September 30~~year, ~~2012~~representing ~~that~~a ~~did~~nominal ~~not reoccur in the current period~~change.

Net loss. Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $48,866, as compared to a net loss of $398,009 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, representing a decrease in loss of $349,143. The primary reason for this change is a reduction in overall expenses for the Company and a slight increase in sales.13

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012.

Revenue. Total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $87,927, as compared to revenue of $70,716 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, an increase of $17,211. The increase is primarily due to efforts made to improve sales conditions.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $214,047, as compared to total operating expenses of $951,612 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, representing a decrease of $737,565. These decreases are principally due to staff, office administration expense and professional fee reductions.

Other income (expense). Total other expense amounted to $186.745 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to $226,952 for the corresponding period of the prior year, representing a decrease of $40,207. The decreased expense is principally related to the loss recognized on the settlement of shares issued for debt during the nine month period ended September 30, 2012.

Net loss. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $320,885, as compared to a net loss of $1,164,147 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, representing a decrease in loss of $843,2621. The primary reason for this change is a decrease in staff costs, office administrative expenses, professional fees and elimination of loss recognized on the settlement of shares issued for debt.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We require up to approximately $5.50 million to repay indebtedness including interest in the next 12 months. We do not anticipate that our cash on hand or anticipated revenues from operations will be adequate to meet our operating expenses over the next 12 months. Also, we do not believe we have adequate capital to repay all of our debt currently due and becoming due in the next 12 months. We anticipate that our available capital during the next 12 months principally will be used for:

·*

administrative expenses, including salaries of officers and other employees we plan to hire;

·*

repayment of debt;

·*

sales and marketing;

·*

product development, testing and manufacturing; and

·*

expenses of professionals, including accountants and attorneys.

Our accumulated deficit at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015 was $50,~~722~~960,~~127~~857. There is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, due to our working capital deficit at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015.

The following provides principal terms of our outstanding debt as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015:

·o One loan from three family members, each of whom is an unaffiliated party, evidenced by four promissory notes in the aggregate principal amounts of $100,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $100,000, each due September 24, 2001 with interest rates ranging from 11% to 12%. We entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, we were required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. We did not make this payment and are in default of these notes. As of March 31, 2015, we have $699,102 accrued for including interest relating to this matter.

o One loan from ~~three~~an ~~family~~unaffiliated ~~members,~~party ~~each~~in ofthe ~~whom~~aggregate isprincipal anamount ~~unaffiliated~~of ~~party~~$195,000 ~~evidenced~~with byinterest ~~four~~at ~~promissory~~a ~~notes~~rate inof ~~the~~12% ~~aggregate~~per ~~principal~~annum. ~~amounts~~Pursuant ofto ~~$100,000,~~a ~~$50,000,~~letter ~~$50,000,~~agreement ~~and~~dated ~~$100~~as of August 10,~~000~~ 2004, ~~each~~we ~~due~~entered ~~September~~into ~~24,~~a ~~2001~~settlement with ~~interest~~this ~~rates~~party ~~ranging~~and ~~from~~agreed ~~11%~~ to ~~12%.~~pay Wea ~~entered~~total ~~into~~of $261,000 pursuant to a ~~settlement~~scheduled ~~agreement~~payment inplan through July 2005. Additionally, the ~~third~~Company, ~~quarter~~in ofSeptember 2004, ~~with~~issued ~~each~~206,250 shares of ~~these~~common ~~parties.~~stock ~~Pursuant~~upon tothe ~~this~~conversion ~~agreement,~~of atunpaid ~~June~~interest ~~30,~~in ~~2005,~~the weaggregate ~~were~~amount ~~required~~of to$33,000. ~~pay~~At anMarch ~~additional~~31, 2015, there was $80161,000 asprincipal ~~full~~amount ~~payment~~remaining ofon ~~our~~this ~~obligations~~note. We did not make ~~this~~our scheduled payment ~~and~~under ~~are~~this note in ~~default~~July of2005, ~~these~~and ~~notes.~~are Asin default of ~~September~~this ~~30,~~note ~~2013,~~and we ~~have~~owed $~~699~~136,~~102~~538 ~~accrued~~in ~~for including~~ interest ~~relating~~on to this ~~matter~~note.

·o One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $98,500, due July 31, 2005, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At March 31, 2015, there was $71,500 and accrued interest of $54,014. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $~~195~~100,000 ~~with~~due ~~interest~~on atMarch a31, 2006 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As ~~Pursuant to a letter agreement dated as~~ of ~~August~~March 1031, ~~2004~~2015, we ~~entered~~owed ~~into a settlement with this party and agreed to pay a total of~~ $~~261~~91,~~000~~500 ~~pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. Additionally, the Company,~~ in ~~September 2004, issued 206,250 shares of common stock upon the conversion of unpaid~~ interest ~~in the aggregate amount of $33,000~~. We Atdid ~~September~~not ~~30,~~make ~~2013,~~our ~~there~~scheduled ~~was~~payment ~~$161,000 principal amount remaining~~ on ~~this~~March ~~note~~31, 2006. We ~~did~~have ~~not~~verbally ~~make~~extended ~~our~~the ~~scheduled~~unpaid ~~payment~~note ~~under~~and ~~this~~the ~~note~~due indate ~~July~~and ~~2005,~~other ~~and~~terms are inbeing ~~default~~renegotiated ofso ~~this~~the note ~~and~~is wenot ~~owed~~considered ~~$136,538~~ in ~~interest on this note~~default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500 due September 27, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $1,735 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on June 27, 2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $9,940 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $9,940 in principal and approximately $6,689 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,638 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $1,638 in principal and approximately $1,183 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,420 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $1,420 in principal and $1,036 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $776 due on September 3, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $951 in principal balance and approximately $496 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on September 3, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on July 25, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $36,500 in principal and approximately $10,293 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on August 8, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $40,000 in principal and $17,600 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $35,000 due on August 16, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $35,000 in principal and $15,015 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 11, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $60,000 in principal and 23,800 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 21, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $60,000 in principal and $23,800 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on December 20, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $50,000 in principal and $19,500 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on January 26, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $50,000 in principal and $ 13,000 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on January 31, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $50,000 in principal and $19,500 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on February 16, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $60,000 in principal and $22,500 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on February 21, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $40,000 in principal and $14,350 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on July 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 5.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $30,000 in principal and $7,300 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $27,500 due on April 24, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $27,500 in principal and $6,600 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $41,623 due on August 14, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $41,623 in principal and $9,536 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $41,848 due on August 21, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $41,848 in principal and $9,749 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $32,500 due on May 27, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $32,500 in principal and $9,749 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $120,435 due on September 24, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, we owed $120,435 in principal and $24,088 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $98,500, due July 31, 2005, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At September 30, 2013, there was $71,500 and accrued interest of $41,144. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 due on March 31, 2006 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $91,500 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2006. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500 due September 27, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $1,250 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on June 27, 2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $9,940 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $9,940 in principal and approximately $4,900 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,638 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $1,638 in principal and approximately $888 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,420 due on March 31, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $1,420 in principal and $786 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $776 due on September 3, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $776 in principal balance and approximately $357 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on September 3, 2010. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on July 25, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $36,500 in principal and approximately $3,723 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on August 8, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $40,000 in principal and $10,400 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $35,000 due on August 16, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $35,000 in principal and $8,925 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 11, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $60,000 in principal and $13,200 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 21, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $60,000 in principal and $13,000 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on December 20, 2014 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $50,000 in principal and $10,500 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on January 26, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $50,000 in principal and $ 4,000 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on January 31, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $50,000 in principal and $10,000 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on February 16, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $60,000 in principal and $11,700 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on February 21, 2015 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $40,000 in principal and $7,800 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on July 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 5.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $30,000 in principal and $2,250 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $27,500 due on April 24, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $27,500 in principal and $3,300 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $41,623 due on August 14, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $41,623 in principal and $4,578 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $41,848 due on August 21, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $41,848 in principal and $4,750 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $32,500 due on May 27, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $32,500 in principal and $3,250 in interest.

One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $120,435 due on September 24, 2013 with an interest rate of 8.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $120,435 in principal and $9,635 in interest.

Management continues to take steps to address the Company's liquidity needs. In the past, management has entered into agreements with some of our note holders to amend the terms of our notes to provide for extended scheduled payment arrangements. Management is engaged in discussions with each holder of debt that is in default and continues to seek extensions with respect to our debt that is past due. In addition, management may endeavor to convert some portion of the principal amount and interest on our debt into shares of common stock.

Historically, we have financed operations through private debt and equity financings. In recent years, financial institutions have been unwilling to lend to us and the cost of obtaining working capital from investors has been high. We principally intend to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities. The more recent price and volume volatility in our common stock has made it more difficult for management to negotiate sales of its securities at a price it believes to be fair to the Company. The Company actively continues to pursue additional equity or debt financings, but cannot provide any assurance that it will be successful. If we are unable to pay our debt as it becomes due and are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, we will not be able to accomplish any or all of our initiatives and will be forced to consider steps that would protect our assets against our creditors.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, and that would be considered material to investors.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide a response to this item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), who is also our Principal Accounting Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report.

Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Additional Disclosure Concerning Controls and Procedures.

We currently believe that the Company has material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures. We will continue to work in the coming weeks and months to address such weaknesses. We believe that the out-of-pocket costs, the diversion of management's attention from running the day-to-day operations and operational changes caused by the need to make changes in our internal control and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) could be significant and still we may not achieve significant improvements in our internal controls and procedures. If the time and costs associated with such compliance exceed our current expectations, our results of operations and the accuracy and timeliness of the filing of our annual and periodic reports may be materially adversely affected and could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

1816

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As previously reported in our ~~Quarterly~~Annual ~~Reports~~Report on Form 10-QK for the ~~quarters~~year ended ~~March~~December 31, ~~2012 and June 30~~2014, ~~2012, on November 1, 2010~~ the accounting firm of A.J. Robbins, P.C. filed a lawsuit in the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado, seeking recovery of fees allegedly owed for accounting services performed during 2004 to 2008. The claims have been asserted against the Company, a second corporate defendant, and our CEO, as a result of a personal guarantee. On December 15, 2010, Defendants filed an Answer which asserted several defenses. The parties exchanged initial disclosures, and the matter was set for trial commencing on December 5, 2011. On August 3, 2011 the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Defendants in the case will jointly pay $85,000 to the plaintiffs and the Company will issue $45,000 of the Company’s stock to the plaintiffs. The Company was responsible to pay 50% of the cash payments, the other 50% of which was the responsibility of a second defendant. The cash payments were scheduled to be made in equal monthly payments over 7 months commencing on August 31, 2011. In consideration of the settlement, the parties have executed a mutual release and have agreed to withdraw the lawsuit. The releases and withdrawal are contingent upon the Company's full performance of the settlement agreement terms. The Company issued stock with a fair market value of $36,000 on the date of the agreement in full payment of the stock portion of the settlement agreement. As of November 11, 2012, the Company and the second corporate defendant have fulfilled all the obligations with respect to this liability and all of the $85,000 has been paid to the plaintiffs.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide a response to this item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

~~During~~These were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012,~~2015. During we issued the following securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We did not employ any form of general solicitation or advertising in connection with the offer and sale of the securities described below. In addition, we believe the purchasers of the securities are "accredited investors" for the purpose of Rule 501 of the Securities Act. For these reasons, among others, the offer and sale of the following securities were made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act:

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

We have defaulted upon the following senior securities:

· One loan from three family members, each of whom is an unaffiliated party, evidenced by four promissory notes in the aggregate principal amounts of $100,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $100,000, each due June 24, 2001 with interest rates ranging from 11% to 12%. We entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, we were required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. We did not make scheduled payments and are in default of these notes.

· One loan from ~~three family members, each of whom is~~ an unaffiliated party, ~~evidenced by four promissory notes~~ in the aggregate principal ~~amounts~~amount of $~~100~~195,000, ~~$50,000,~~with ~~$50,000,~~interest ~~and~~at ~~$100,000,~~a ~~each~~rate ~~due~~of ~~June~~9% ~~24,~~per ~~2001~~annum. ~~with~~Pursuant ~~interest~~to ~~rates~~a ~~ranging~~letter ~~from~~agreement ~~11%~~dated toas ~~12%.~~of WeAugust 10, 2004, we entered into a settlement ~~agreement~~with inthis ~~the~~party ~~third~~and ~~quarter~~agreed ofto ~~2004~~pay ~~with~~a ~~each~~total of ~~these~~$261,000 ~~parties.~~pursuant ~~Pursuant~~ to ~~this~~a ~~agreement,~~scheduled atpayment ~~June~~plan ~~30,~~through July 2005. Additionally, wethe ~~were~~Company, ~~required~~in toSeptember ~~pay~~2004, anissued ~~additional $80~~206,~~000~~250 asshares ~~full payment~~ of ~~our~~common ~~obligations.~~stock Weupon ~~did~~the ~~not~~conversion ~~make~~of ~~scheduled~~unpaid ~~payments~~interest ~~and~~in ~~are~~the inaggregate ~~default~~amount of ~~these notes~~$33,000. AsAt ofMarch ~~September 30~~31, ~~2012~~2015, wethere ~~have~~was $~~699~~161,~~102~~000 ~~accrued~~principal ~~for~~amount ~~including~~remaining ~~interest~~on ~~relating~~this tonote. We did not make our scheduled payment under this ~~matter~~note and are in default.

· One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $98,500, due July 31, 2005 with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At March 31, 2015, there was $71,500 principal amount remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payments under this note and are in default.

One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $195,000 with interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated as of August 10, 2004, we entered into a settlement with this party and agreed to pay a total of $261,000 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. Additionally, the Company, in September 2004, issued 206,250 shares of common stock upon the conversion of unpaid interest in the aggregate amount of $33,000. At September 30, 2012, there was $161,000 principal amount remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note and are in default. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $136,538 in interest on this note.

One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $98,500, due July 31, 2005 with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At September 30, 2012, there was $71,500 principal amount remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payments under this note and are in default. As of September 30, 2013, we owed $41,144 in interest on this note.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

We have no disclosure applicable to this item.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we entered into agreements to issue 35,268 shares of common stock to various notes holders to convert outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately $141,071. See Items 2 with respect to the individual conversion terms and issuances. Such issuances constituted in excess of 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

There were no changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit List

4.18		2011 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-174010) filed on May 6, 2011).
4.19		2011 Equity Incentive Plan II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-177555) filed on October 27, 2011).
10.1		Form of Note Conversion Agreement*
31		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
[101]		Interactive Data Files (to be filed by amendment)

* Filed herewith.

2118

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY


	UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY

Dated: December 31, 2015	By:	/s/ Jacques Tizabi
		Jacques Tizabi,
		President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Acting Principal Financial Officer)

~~Dated: February~~ 19~~, 2015~~

By:

/s/ Jacques Tizabi

Jacques Tizabi,

President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Acting Principal Financial Officer)

Filing Compare · UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY