UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

X .	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
X	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2012
	For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014
.	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
	For the Transition Period from ________ to _________
	For the Transition Period from to

~~FUTURE~~MARILYNJEAN ~~ENERGY~~INTERACTIVE ~~CORP~~INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada	000-54870	41-2281199
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)

Nevada	333-170201	41-2281199
(State or other jurisdiction	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer
of Incorporation)		Identification Number)
	840 23rd Street St. Georges, Quebec G5Y 4N6 Canada
	(Address of principal executive offices)
	(418) 263-2272
	(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

2360 Corporate Circle, Suite 400, Henderson, NV 89074-7722

(Address of principal executive offices)

~~Indicate~~(702) ~~by check mark if the registrant is a well~~425-~~known~~6951 ~~seasoned~~(Registrant’s ~~issuer,~~Telephone ~~as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.~~ Number)

~~Yes .~~Securities ~~No X .~~registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

~~Indicate~~Title byof ~~check~~Each ~~mark~~Class ifName ~~the~~of ~~registrant~~each isexchange ~~not~~on ~~required~~which ~~to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.~~ registered

~~Yes .~~Securities ~~No X~~ registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: common stock with a par value of $0.001

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.	Yes No X

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.	Yes No X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.	Yes X No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).	Yes No X

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	.	Accelerated filer	.
Non-accelerated filer	. (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes . No X .

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of ~~January~~December 31, ~~2012~~2014 was $Nil based upon the price ($Nil) at which the common stock was last sold as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter, multiplied by the approximate number of shares of common stock held by persons other than executive officers, directors and five percent stockholders of the registrant without conceding that any such person is an “affiliate” of the registrant for purposes of the federal securities laws.

AsIndicate ofthe ~~October~~number ~~31,~~of ~~2012,~~shares ~~there~~outstanding ~~were~~of ~~119,528,352 shares~~each of the ~~registrant~~issuer’s ~~$0.001~~classes ~~par~~of ~~value~~ common stock, ~~issued~~as ~~and~~of ~~outstanding.~~the latest practicable date:

194,528,352 common shares issued and outstanding as at March 30, 2015.

Does not include the 106,651,250 common shares of the Company that are reserved for issuance and issuable upon the redemption at any time by the holders of 106,651,250 Class B Exchangeable Preferred shares (the “Exchangeable Preferred Shares”) in the capital of MarilynJean Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Each Exchangeable Preferred Share is convertible into one common share in the capital of the Company on a one-for-one basis.

Documents incorporated by reference: None

Table of Contents

		Page
	PAGE
	PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	4
Item 1	Business	5
PART I	4
Item 1A	Risk Factors	9
Item 1. Business	4
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	9
Additional Information	6
Item 2	Properties	9
Item 1A. Risk Factors	6
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	9
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	8
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	9
Item 2. Properties	8
	PART II
Item 3. Legal Proceedings	8
Item 5	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	10
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	9
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	10
PART II	9
Item 7	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
ITEM 5. Market for the Company’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	9
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	12
Item 6. Selected Financial Data	10
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	F-1
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	13
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	13
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	13
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	13
Item 9B	Other Information	14
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	14
	PART III
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures	14
Item 10	Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	15
Item 9B. Other Information	15
Item 11	Executive Compensation	19
PART III	16
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	20
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	16
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	21
Item 11. Executive Compensation	20
Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	22
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	22
	PART IV
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	23
Item 15	Exhibits	23
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services	24
PART IV	26
Item 15. Exhibits	26
SIGNATURES	27

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This ~~Annual~~annual ~~Report~~report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. These risks and uncertainties include the following:

The availability and adequacy of our cash flow to meet our requirements;

Economic, competitive, demographic, business and other conditions in our local and regional markets;

Changes or developments in laws, regulations or taxes in our industry;

Actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties including our suppliers and competitors, as well as legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities;

Competition in our industry;

The loss of or failure to obtain any license or permit necessary or desirable in the operation of our business;

Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;

The availability of additional capital to support capital improvements and development; and

Other risks identified in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ~~or the SEC~~.

This report should be read completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this ~~Report~~report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Use of Term

~~Except~~All asamounts ~~otherwise~~in ~~indicated~~this byannual ~~the~~report ~~context,~~are ~~references~~stated in United States dollars unless otherwise indicated. In this annual report, tothe terms “~~Company~~we”, “~~FEC~~us”, “~~we,~~our”, “usthe Company” and “~~our~~MarilynJean” ~~are~~mean ~~references~~MarilynJean toInteractive ~~Future Energy Corp~~Inc. ~~All~~and ~~references~~its ~~to “USD” or United States Dollars refer to the legal currency of the United States of America~~subsidiary.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

~~BUSINESS~~Description of our Business

~~DESCRIPTION~~Corporate ~~OF OUR BUSINESS~~Overview

~~Corporate~~We ~~History~~were incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 6, 2010. Following incorporation, we were engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of prospective resource properties. However, we were not successful in developing our oil and gas interests and thus began to investigate other business opportunities in order to maximize shareholder value. As a result, on March 25, 2013, we entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with MarilynJean Media Inc. (“MJM”), a private company incorporated under the laws of British Columbia. The Share Exchange Agreement closed on March 28, 2013.

WeFollowing ~~were incorporated in~~ the ~~state~~closing of ~~Nevada~~the onShare ~~April~~Exchange 6Agreement, ~~2010 and~~ our ~~principal~~company ~~business~~decided ~~address~~to isfocus ~~840~~on ~~23rd~~MJM’s ~~Street~~business, ~~St.~~which ~~Georges,~~is ~~Quebec,~~the ~~G5Y~~business ~~4N6,~~of ~~Canada.~~operating Wea ~~are~~members-only ~~currently~~private ansale ~~exploration~~ecommerce ~~stage~~website ~~company~~providing ~~engaged~~reduced inretail ~~the~~prices ~~acquisition,~~on ~~exploration,~~baby and ~~development~~children’s brands of ~~prospective~~apparel, ~~resource~~toys ~~properties~~and accessories. With ~~Our current business focus is to implement~~ the ~~terms~~commencement of ~~our~~the ~~assignment~~new ~~agreements~~business ~~with~~operated ~~Tim~~through ~~Cooksey Oil~~MJM, ~~LLC~~our ~~(“Tim~~board ~~Cooksey~~of ~~Oil”)~~directors ~~pursuant~~decided to ~~which~~seek weout ~~acquired~~opportunities ato ~~1.57%~~divest ~~working~~our ~~interest~~company inof ~~two~~all ~~wells~~assets ~~identified~~related asto ~~Charles~~our ~~Prior~~oil ~~#1A~~ and ~~#2A~~gas ~~located~~business. inAlthough ~~Franklin~~our ~~County,~~company ~~Illinois~~has ~~(the~~not ~~“Charles~~entered ~~Prior~~into ~~Project”)~~any innegotiations ~~consideration~~or ofagreements arelated ~~payment~~to ofsuch ~~$25~~divestiture,~~000,~~ ~~and~~our ~~with~~board ~~CJT.JKV~~of ~~Oil~~directors ~~Development,~~has ~~LLC~~instructed ~~(“JKV~~management ~~Oil Development”), pursuant~~ to ~~which~~seek weout ~~acquired~~viable aoptions 3%related ~~working~~to ~~interest in five wells collectively identified as~~ the ~~Sesser~~sale ~~Wells~~and ~~located~~disposition ~~in Franklin County, Illinois (the “Sesser Wells”) in consideration~~ of asuch ~~payment of $25,000~~assets.

Mr. and Ms. Paquet first became interested in the prospect of working interests in oil wells through online research. After conducting research, they determined that oil and gas investments could be an excellent long term strategy. Mr. and Ms. Paquet first became affiliated with Tim Cooksey Oil through an online posting whereby JKV Management Consulting, LLC (“JKV Consulting”) was presenting interests in various oil wells, including ones from Tim Cooksey Oil. JKV Consulting, of which Mr. Villines is the President, maintains an online posting of wells in which Mr. Villines, or one of his companies, owns a working interest because as an owner of such interests it is in Mr. Villines best interest to sell the remaining working interests since the sale of working interests to additional owners thereby amounts to a smaller proportion of operating and pumping expenses that Mr. Villines and other owners have to pay for the wells. Mr. Paquet initiated contact with the President of JKV Consulting, Mr. Jefferson Villines (“Mr. Villines”), which ultimately led to the purchase of the working interest in the Charles Prior Project, with Tim Cooksey (“Mr. Cooksey”) acting as the operator (the “Operator”) of the wells. Further research led to the decision that taking the Company public would provide the best opportunity to facilitate future financing. Mr. and Ms. Paquet did not agree to form the Company or to serve as an officer or director of the Company in any part due to a plan, agreement, or understanding that they would solicit, participate in, or facilitate the sale of the enterprise to (or a business combination with) a third party looking to obtain or become a public reporting entity. Further Mr. and Ms. Paquet have no such intention to do so.4

~~Mr.~~During ~~Villines~~the ~~has~~first afew ~~retained~~months aof 52015, ~~percent~~management ~~(5%) interest in the Charles Prior Project~~ and ~~a fifteen percent (15%) interest in~~ the ~~Sesser~~board ~~Wells~~has ~~(with~~decided ~~both projects hereinafter referred~~ to aspursue ~~the~~and ~~“Well~~identify ~~Projects”),~~other ~~with~~business ~~both~~opportunities ~~interests~~to ~~held~~benefit ~~through~~our ~~JKV~~company ~~Oil Development. Through JKV Consulting, Mr. Villines coordinates with Mr. Cooksey,~~ and ~~the~~bring ~~Company’s~~value ~~consulting geologist, Mr. James Eader (“Mr. Eader”),~~ to ~~oversee the drilling of the Well Projects~~shareholders. The ~~drilling~~business ofoperated ~~the Well Projects is being conducted~~ by ~~George~~MJM ~~Mitchell~~has ~~Drilling,~~not anresulted ~~unaffiliated~~in ~~third party. Neither Mr. Villines nor his affiliated companies, JKV Consulting, and JKV Oil Development (collectively~~ the ~~“Affiliated~~sales ~~Companies”), have received any compensation~~ or ~~commission~~growth inintended ~~conjunction~~by ~~with the assignment of either of the Wells Projects in which the Company owns working interests~~management. As ~~Other~~a ~~than~~result, ~~the~~management ~~interests Mr. Cooksey has retained in the Charles Prior Project~~ and the ~~Sesser~~board ~~Wells,~~are ~~and~~looking ~~Mr.~~weighing ~~Cooksey’s~~all ~~role~~options aswith ~~Operator~~respect ofto ~~the~~business ~~Well Projects, Mr~~opportunities. Cooksey and Mr. Villines and his Affiliated Companies do not have any related affiliations or written agreements or contracts; however, they hold working interests in other non-affiliated wells together.

WeAcquisition ~~entered into operating agreements with Tim Cooksey Oil on July 25, 2010 for the Charles Prior Project and on September 1, 2010, for the Sesser Wells. Pursuant to the terms~~ of ~~our~~MarilynJean ~~agreements~~Media ~~with Tim Cooksey Oil, Mr~~Inc. Cooksey agreed to act as the Operator for the drilling, testing and completion of the subject wells and we agreed to share the proportionate ongoing operating fees and pumping expenses of the Charles Prior Project as such fees were waived for the Sesser Wells as part of our negotiations for acquiring the working interest in the Sesser Wells; however, we are not responsible for any additional Operator expenses such as drilling, testing, or completion of the wells. If the wells are viable and can be developed, we will receive a pro-rata share of any revenues equivalent to our working interest in the wells. If the wells are not viable, we expect the Operator to plug the wells; however, we will not be responsible for any portion of the costs related to plugging the wells. Additionally, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements with Tim Cooksey Oil, LLC, we are severally liable for environmental and any other liabilities with regards to the Well Projects; however, we are only liable to the extent of our working interest in such Well Projects; therefore, our percentage of liability may be small as compared to the percentage of liability for the entire working interest, but such liability could still pose a material risk to our investment.

5On March 28, 2013, we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of MJM (the “Transaction”). MJM operates a members-only private sale ecommerce website providing reduced retail prices on baby and children’s brands of apparel, toys and accessories. Pursuant to the Transaction, we issued a total of 75,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to the former shareholders of MJM, equating to one share of common stock in the capital of our company for every issued common share of MJM.

~~There~~Pursuant ~~are~~to ~~leases underlying~~ the ~~wells~~Transaction, ~~in which we own working interests; however we are not~~ the ~~holder~~Canadian ofshareholders ~~any~~ of ~~these~~MJM ~~leases~~sold ~~and~~106,651,250 ~~therefore~~common weshares ~~are~~in ~~not responsible for~~ the ~~payment~~capital ~~or evaluation~~ of ~~any~~MJM ~~obligations~~to ~~under~~MarilynJean ~~such~~Holdings ~~leases~~Inc., ~~Tim~~our ~~Cooksey~~wholly-owned ~~Oil~~subsidiary, isin ~~responsible~~consideration for ~~paying and maintaining~~ the ~~leases~~issuance ~~and~~of ~~has~~106,651,250 ~~informed~~Exchangeable ~~the~~Preferred ~~Company~~Shares ~~that~~to ~~the~~such ~~amount~~Canadian ofshareholders ~~work done~~ on ~~both~~a ofone-for-one ~~the leases has far exceeded the amount of work necessary to maintain the leases~~basis. The ~~lessee~~Exchangeable ~~may~~Preferred ~~lose~~Shares ~~substantial~~are ~~portions~~redeemable orby ~~all of~~ the ~~entire~~holders ~~property underlying our Well Projects due to operating~~ and ~~environmental hazards~~, ~~which either have not been insured against or cannot be insured against. This could result~~ in acertain ~~potential~~circumstances, ~~reduction~~by of our ~~working interests in the Well Projects~~company, orinto ~~even~~common ~~losing~~shares ~~such interests in their entirety. Additionally, government regulations could either increase the cost~~ of ~~operations~~our company on ~~the~~a ~~Well~~one-for-one ~~Projects~~basis ~~or require alteration or cessation of operations~~ in ~~certain~~accordance ~~areas~~with of the ~~properties~~terms ~~underlying~~of ~~the~~a ~~Well~~share ~~Projects.~~exchange ~~Further~~agreement, wetrust ~~may~~agreement beand ~~subject~~support ~~to partial payment for such liabilities according to our working interests in the Well Projects~~agreement. The ~~payment~~Exchangeable ofPreferred ~~such~~Shares ~~liabilities~~were ~~could~~issued ~~reduce the funds available~~ to usMJM orshareholders ~~could~~resident ~~result~~ in aCanada ~~total~~in ~~loss~~order ofto ~~our~~minimize ~~working interests. The occurrence of~~ any ofadverse ~~these~~tax ~~events~~consequences ~~could~~for ~~significantly~~such ~~reduce our revenues, cause substantial losses or impair our future operating results and liquidity as our working interests in the Well Projects are the only assets we currently have~~shareholders.

~~The~~Additionally, ~~Charles~~on ~~Prior Project is located in~~ the ~~Illinois~~closing ~~Basin~~date ~~approximately 100 miles southeast~~ of ~~St. Louis, Missouri. The authorized work program under~~ the ~~joint venture includes drilling~~Transaction, ~~testing and completion of~~ the ~~two~~non-Canadian ~~wells~~shareholders ~~to a total depth~~ of ~~3,800~~MJM ~~+/- to check the Rosiclare Sandstone and Salem formation for hydrocarbons to be abstracted and~~ sold. ~~The Sesser Wells are also located in the Illinois Basin approximately 100 miles southeast of St. Louis~~75, ~~Missouri. The authorized work program under the joint venture includes drilling~~000,000 ~~testing~~common ~~and~~shares ~~completion~~in of the ~~two~~capital ~~wells to a total depth~~ of ~~3,800~~MJM ~~+/-~~ to ~~check~~our ~~the~~company Stin ~~Louis~~consideration ~~formations~~ for ~~hydrocarbons to be abstracted and sold. The work program on~~ the ~~Sesser~~issuance ~~Wells commenced in August~~ of ~~2010. If we are successful in generating revenues from our joint ventures~~75,000,000 wecommon ~~intend~~shares ~~to acquire working interests~~ in ~~additional wells in~~ the ~~project~~capital ~~area.~~of ~~Subject~~our tocompany ~~obtaining~~on ~~additional~~a ~~financing~~one-for-one ~~we intend to acquire further resource or mineral projects~~basis.

~~Although~~Finally, weon ~~are~~the ~~currently~~closing ~~focused~~of onthe ~~projects~~Transaction, ~~located~~we inissued ~~certain geographic regions~~106,651,250 weSeries ~~continually~~A ~~evaluate~~Special ~~attractive~~Voting ~~resource~~shares ~~opportunities~~(the in“Special ~~other~~Voting ~~geographic~~Shares”) ~~areas.~~to ~~Our~~Chester ~~current~~Ku, ~~focus~~a isformer ondirector ~~acquiring~~of ~~working~~our ~~interests~~company, inas ~~oil~~a ~~and/or~~trustee ~~gas~~(the ~~wells~~“Trustee”) in accordance with the ~~states~~terms of ~~Texas,~~a ~~Illinois,~~share ~~California,~~exchange agreement and intrust agreement. Pursuant to the ~~province~~terms of ~~Alberta,~~the ~~Canada.~~trust ~~However~~agreement, wethe ~~have~~parties ~~not~~created ~~entered~~the ~~into~~trust ~~negotiations~~for orthe ~~discussions~~benefit ~~for~~of ~~any~~the holders of ~~these~~the ~~purchases~~Exchangeable asPreferred weShares ~~are~~to ~~merely~~enable ~~exploring~~the Trustee to exercise the ~~areas~~voting ~~for~~rights ~~potential~~of ~~opportunities.~~such ~~Further,~~shareholders weuntil dosuch ~~not~~time ~~have~~as ~~any~~they ~~reserves~~choose onto ~~any~~redeem their Exchangeable Preferred Shares and receive common shares of our ~~wells~~company ason ~~there~~such ~~has~~redemption, ~~not~~and ~~been~~to ~~any~~allow ~~reserve~~the ~~reports~~Trustee ~~conducted~~to onhold ~~the~~certain ~~properties~~exchange ~~underlying~~rights in respect of the ~~wells~~Exchangeable Preferred Shares. WeThe ~~have~~Special ~~limited~~Voting ~~operating~~Shares ~~income~~entitle ~~and,~~the asTrustee ato ~~result~~exercise one vote per Special Voting Share, ~~depend~~with ~~upon~~the ~~funding~~number ~~from~~of ~~various~~Special ~~sources~~Voting toShares ~~continue~~outstanding ~~operations~~being ~~and~~equal to ~~implement~~the ~~our~~number ~~growth~~of ~~strategy~~Exchangeable Preferred Shares outstanding during the term of the agreement.

~~Mr.~~Intellectual ~~and~~Property Ms. Paquet, our executive officers, currently reside in Quebec, Canada and while neither has technical training or prior experiences in the oil and gas industry, Mr. Paquet has prior project management, and business experience. Additionally, Mr. Andersen, who serves solely as a director of the Company, is a licensed geologist with experience in mineral and petroleum exploration, and he has verbally agreed to devote 10-11 hours per week to the Company. Further Mr. Villines, who also serves solely as a director of the Company, has years of experience in the oil and gas industry as the President of both JKV Consulting, a consulting Company located in Texas, which focuses on development and exploration of oil and gas projects and JKV Oil Development, an asset holding company which focuses on oil and gas interests. In addition, Mr. Villines has managed the promotion of developmental and exploratory oil and gas projects to private and institutional bodies, as well as providing private consulting services to a number of independent oil and gas companies. These experiences have given him the skills necessary to evaluate acquisitions, to direct drilling projects and to manage all aspects of extracting oil and gas, including selling the output. Mr. Villines has verbally agreed to devote 2 hours per week to the Company.

~~While~~We ~~neither Mr. nor Ms. Paquet has visited the subject property, one of the Company’s directors, Mr. Villines has visited both of the properties in which the Company~~ currently ~~owns~~own ~~working interests on two occasions. Specifically, Mr. Villines visited~~ the ~~properties once in May of 2010 and once in November of 2010~~MarilynJean.com ~~Additionally,~~domain ~~during~~name ~~the~~associated ~~negotiations to purchase the Well Projects and subsequent to the purchase, JKV Consulting, of which Mr. Villines is the President, provided the Company~~ with ~~photos~~our ~~and videos of the properties and the associated drilling work~~brand.

ToResearch ~~date, we have earned $2,304 revenues, have cash on hand of $409,546~~ and have incurred a net loss of $(100,042) in the period from inception through July 31, 2012. We do not anticipate earning substantial revenues until such time as we enter into commercial production of our working interests in our Well Projects. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The continuation of our company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from our shareholders, the ability of our company to obtain necessary equity financing to achieve our operating objectives, and the attainment of profitable operations from our working interests in oil wells. Development

6We have not incurred expenditures in research and development activities from inception.

~~Charles~~Government ~~Prior Project~~Regulations

OnWe ~~July~~are ~~29,~~not ~~2010,~~aware we entered into an assignment agreement (the “CP Assignment Agreement”) with Tim Cooksey Oil pursuant to which we acquired a 1.57% working interest in the following two wells located in Franklin County, Illinois in consideration of aany ~~payment~~government ofregulations ~~$25,000.~~that ~~Tim~~materially ~~Cooksey~~affects ~~Oil is responsible for paying and maintaining~~ the ~~lease~~operation ~~and the Charles Prior lease encompasses 80 acres. As granted by the Charles Prior Lease agreement between Tim Cooksey Oil and the owner~~ of the Charles Prior Project, Tim Cooksey Oil holds an 80% lease net revenue interest in the two wells, pursuant to the Charles Prior Project underlying lease, which is further documented in the CP Assignment Agreement. This results in the Company having a net revenue interest of approximately 1.26% in the Charles Prior Project. JKV Oil Development, of which our ~~director, Mr~~business. ~~Villines, is the President, owns a five percent (5%) working interest in the Charles Prior Project.~~

~~Charles Prior #1A:~~Subsidiaries

InWe ~~August~~currently ofhold ~~2010, drilling operations were commenced. Charles Prior #1A (“CP 1”) was drilled to a total depth of approximately 3,500 feet. CP 1 had a high volume of gas and had to put~~ the ~~well~~following on a choke. The well was choked back and put online averaging 40 to 50 BOPD. CP 1 had drilling mud come up the well bore, which restricted the oil production, and this was resolved this with acid treatments. Prior to acidizing, the Operator swabbed the well to determine the type of chemical combination needed to dissolve all of the mud to make the acidizing process more efficient. Due to tight rock formations in the well bore, on or about June 27, 2011 the Operator decided to drill 2 legs on the well. This involved using a tool deep underground to drill out twenty feet in two different directions so that the oil would flow in at a higher level from both sides. This has caused the oil to flow at a faster pace, but the Operator will continually evaluate CP 1 to see if any additional steps need to be taken to increase production. subsidiaries:

~~Charles Prior #2A:~~·

~~The~~MarilynJean ~~well~~Holdings ~~has~~Inc. ~~been~~(referred ~~perforated~~to ~~and~~in ~~acidized.~~this ~~Charles~~Form ~~Prior~~10-K ~~#2A~~as (“~~CP 2~~Exchangeco”) ~~will be producing from three pay zones, which will be on the pump jack~~. Exchangeco ~~The~~is ~~well~~a ~~was~~British ~~fraced~~Columbia ~~using~~corporation asolely ~~water~~incorporated ~~frac,~~to ~~which~~facilitate ~~had~~ the ~~objective~~closing of ~~breaking up~~ the ~~rock~~Share inExchange ~~the~~Agreement ~~formation~~on ~~to allow the oil to flow more easily. During~~ a ~~water~~tax ~~frac,~~deferred ~~water~~basis ~~and~~for ~~sand~~former ~~are~~Canadian ~~pumped~~shareholders ~~down the well at high pressure over the course~~ of ~~one~~MarilynJean ~~day.~~Media ~~This fluid is then pumped out of the well over an extended time period~~Inc. Our ~~The~~company ~~frac~~holds ~~took~~100% ~~place in early November and used over 1,400 barrels~~ of ~~fluid, composed primarily of water and sand~~Exchangeco. Following ~~The~~consummation ~~pumping~~ of the ~~fluid~~Share ~~resulting~~Exchange ~~from the frac took place from approximately November 18~~Agreement, ~~2010~~Exchangeco toheld ~~January 18~~106, ~~2011. Over this time period~~651,250 ~~the~~common ~~well~~shares ~~pumped out an average of 100 barrels of fluid per day~~(58. ~~The pumped fluid was composed primarily of water and sand with approximately 6~~7%) ~~oil. The Operator intends to determine the effect drilling 2 legs has had on the CP 1 well, and based on the outcome, may perform the same procedure with the CP 2 well to increase the flow~~ of ~~fluid.~~MarilynJean AsMedia ~~of November 30, 2011, there has not been any additional testing or treatments performed on the CP 2 well~~Inc. The Operator does not have any plans to conduct testing on CP 2 as the well has already been drilled, and the Operator does not have any immediate plans to conduct treating on the wells, but he may decide to do so after re-evaluating the production of the well.

~~Fees and Revenue for the Charles Prior Project:~~ ·

~~The~~ MarilynJean ~~operating~~Media ~~and~~Inc. ~~pumping~~(referred ~~fees~~to onin ~~the~~this ~~Charles~~Form ~~Prior~~10-K ~~Project~~as ~~are~~“MJM”). MJM ~~estimated~~is toa beBritish ~~approximately~~Columbia ~~$1,500~~corporation ~~per~~acquired ~~month.~~by ~~Due~~our tocompany upon the ~~Company’s~~closing ~~1.57%~~of ~~working interest,~~ the ~~Company~~Share ~~anticipates~~Exchange ~~paying $23~~Agreement.55 Our ~~per~~company ~~month~~holds in75,000,000 ~~operating~~common ~~expenses~~shares ~~for~~(41.3%) ~~the~~of ~~Charles~~MJM ~~Prior~~and ~~Project,~~Exchangeco ~~not~~holds ~~including~~the ~~any~~remaining ~~saltwater disposal fees~~106,651,250 ~~which~~common ~~have~~shares ~~not~~(58.7%) ~~been incurred by the Company as~~ of ~~yet~~MJM.

Since November of 2010, division orders were being processed by the Operator, Tim Cooksey Oil. Countrymark Cooperative, LLP (“Countrymark”) has purchased the oil from the Operator. Other than these division orders, the Company does not have any delivery commitments and enters into purchase orders as the oil becomes available. The Operator will be performing daily maintenance on the wells, but there will be no more drilling on the Charles Prior Project. 5

~~Sesser Wells~~Employees

OnWe ~~December~~have ~~17,~~no ~~2010,~~significant weemployees ~~entered~~other ~~into~~than anPeter ~~assignment~~Janosi, ~~agreement~~our ~~(the~~President, ~~“Sesser~~Chief ~~Assignment~~Executive ~~Agreement”)~~Officer, ~~with~~Chief ~~JKV~~Financial ~~Oil Development pursuant to which we acquired a 3% working interest in the following wells located in Franklin County~~Officer, ~~Illinois in consideration of a payment of $25~~Secretary,~~000.~~ ~~Tim~~Treasurer ~~Cooksey Oil is responsible for paying~~ and ~~maintaining the lease and the Sesser lease encompasses 500 acres~~Director. We Asbelieve ~~granted~~that byuntil ~~the~~such ~~Sesser~~time ~~Lease~~that ~~Agreement~~we ~~between~~have ~~Tim~~fully ~~Cooksey~~developed ~~Oil~~our ~~and~~plan ~~the owner~~ of ~~the~~operations ~~Sesser~~we ~~Wells,~~will ~~Tim~~not ~~Cooksey~~have ~~Oil~~any ~~holds~~employees anand ~~80%~~that ~~lease~~we ~~net~~will ~~revenue~~frequently ~~interest~~use inconsultants ~~the Sesser Wells, pursuant~~ to ~~the~~assist ~~Sesser Wells underlying lease, which is further documented~~ in the ~~Sesser~~completion ~~Assignment Agreement. This results in the Company having a net revenue interest~~ of ~~2.4%~~various ~~in the Sesser Wells~~projects. ~~JKV Oil Development, of which our director, Mr. Villines, is the President, retained a fifteen percent (15%) working interest in the Sesser Wells.~~

~~The~~Additional Sesser Wells consist of (i) three exploratory wells, (ii) one new well referred to as the Illinois Minerals #1-A (the “Illinois Well”), and (i) one injection well. The three exploratory wells have previously been drilled, and have produced oil in the past; however, as they are older wells they could be entirely depleted. We are using the injection well primarily to inject water into the exploratory wells to bring any remaining oil to the surface. This is accomplished by recharging the formation of the wells to produce a higher volume of oil from the past producing wells. Additionally, drilling was commenced on the Illinois Well in August of 2010.Opportunities

7We have not been as successful as originally anticipated with respect to our current business of operating a members-only private sale ecommerce website that provides reduced retail prices on baby and children’s brands of apparel, toys and accessories. We are currently seeking alternative and suitable business opportunities. As of the date hereof, management has not entered into any formal written agreements for a business combination or business opportunity. If and when any such agreement is reached, we intend to disclose such an agreement by filing a current report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

AsADDITIONAL of February 7, 2011, the final well reports indicated that the Illinois Well had been drilled to a total depth of 3,500 feet. Around July 14, 2011, the Operator injected water into the water injection well in order for the water to push the oil over to the Illinois Well to increase production. In the event this does not increase production, the operator may decide to treat the wells with chemicals if there is paraffin, or a waxy buildup, caking the perforations of the well bore, but the operator has no immediate plans to do this as he would like to continually re-evaluate how much oil is being produced from the Illinois Well. INFORMATION

~~The~~We ~~aggregate~~file ~~operating and pumping fees on the Sesser Wells are estimated to be approximately $750.00 per month; however~~annual, asquarterly ~~part~~and ofcurrent ~~the negotiations for receiving the working interest~~reports, ~~the~~proxy ~~Company~~statements isand ~~currently~~other ~~not~~information ~~responsible~~with ~~for any operating fees for~~ the ~~Sesser Wells~~SEC. You ~~The~~may ~~Operator~~read ~~has~~and ~~informed~~copy ~~the~~our ~~Company~~reports ~~that~~or ~~operating~~other ~~fees~~filings ~~will~~made bewith ~~assessed against~~ the ~~Company~~SEC ~~once~~at the ~~division orders are processed. Due to the Company~~SEC’s 3%Public ~~working~~Reference ~~interest in the Sesser Wells~~Room, ~~once~~located ~~the~~at ~~Company is responsible for the operating fees for the Sesser Wells~~100 F Street, ~~the Company anticipates its share of the operating fees shall be approximately $22~~N.~~50 per month~~W., ~~not including any saltwater disposal fees~~Washington, ~~which~~DC ~~have not been incurred by the Company as of yet~~20549. You ~~The~~can ~~Sesser~~obtain ~~Wells~~information ~~were being refitted for new drilling equipment, but there will be no more drilling~~ on the ~~wells~~operation inof the ~~near~~Public ~~future.~~Reference ~~However,~~Room ~~the~~by ~~Operator~~calling ~~may decide to perform new drillings on~~ the ~~production~~SEC ~~wells~~at ~~if needed~~1-800-SEC-0330. You ~~The~~can ~~Company~~also ~~does~~access ~~not~~these ~~have~~reports ~~any delivery commitments~~ and ~~enters~~other ~~into~~filings ~~purchase~~electronically ~~orders~~on as the ~~oil~~SEC’s ~~becomes~~web ~~available; therefore~~site, ~~the level of oil in tanks fluctuates~~www. sec.gov.

~~The~~ITEM ~~hydrocarbons being extracted and produced from the Well Projects are comprised of the oil itself and a small amount of natural gas~~1A. ~~The~~RISK oil being extracted and produced from the Well Projects is the only hydrocarbon currently being sold, and thus the only hydrocarbon currently generating revenue for the Company. While there is natural gas being produced from the Well Projects, it is an insufficient amount to be viable for sale; therefore, the natural gas is not generating revenue for the Company and it is solely being used to power the pump jacks to further extract oil from the Well Projects.FACTORS

~~Corporate~~Risks ~~Developments~~Related to our Business

OnIf ~~June~~we 1,do ~~2012,~~not ~~Future~~obtain ~~Energy,~~additional ~~Corp.~~financing, awe ~~Nevada~~will ~~corporation~~not ~~(the~~be ~~“Company”)~~able ~~appointed~~to ~~Mr.~~conduct ~~Chester~~our Kubusiness ~~(“Mr.~~operations ~~Ku”)~~to ~~as a director of~~ the ~~Company.~~extent ~~Mr.~~that Kuwe ~~accepted~~become ~~such appointment~~profitable.

OnOur orcurrent ~~about~~operating ~~June~~funds 4,will ~~2012,~~cover the ~~Company~~initial ~~filed~~stages ~~with~~of ~~the~~our ~~Secretary~~business ofplan; ~~State~~however, ofwe ~~Nevada~~only arecently ~~Certificate~~commenced ofoperations ~~Change~~and have generated limited revenue to ~~its~~date. ~~Articles~~We ofwill ~~Incorporation~~require ~~(the~~significant ~~“Certificate~~additional offunds ~~Change”).~~to Asexecute and grow our business and we will incur significant legal and accounting costs necessary to maintain a ~~result~~public ofcorporation. ~~the~~We ~~Certificate~~currently ofdo ~~Change,~~not ~~the~~have ~~Company~~any ~~has~~arrangements ~~increased~~for ~~the~~financing ~~authorized~~in ~~number~~place ofand ~~shares~~we ofmay ~~common~~not ~~stock~~be able to ~~five~~obtain ~~hundred~~financing ~~million~~when ~~(500,000,000)~~required. ~~and~~We ~~increased~~believe the ~~authorized~~only ~~number~~source of ~~shares~~funds ofthat ~~preferred~~would ~~stock~~be torealistic ~~two~~is ~~hundred~~through ~~million~~a ~~(200,000,000).~~loan from our directors and officers and the sale of equity capital.

~~Government~~We ~~Regulations~~cannot offer any assurance as to our future financial results. You may lose your entire investment.

~~The~~We ~~production~~have ~~and~~not ~~sale~~received ofsubstantial ~~oil~~income from operations to date and ~~gas~~future isfinancial ~~subject~~results toare ~~regulation~~uncertain. byWe ~~state,~~cannot ~~federal~~assure you that we can operate in a profitable manner. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $634,259 ~~and~~from ~~local~~inception ~~authorities~~to December 31, 2014. InEven ~~most~~if ~~areas~~we ~~there~~obtain ~~are~~future ~~statutory~~revenues ~~provisions~~sufficient ~~regulating~~to ~~the~~expand ~~production~~operations, increased cost of ~~oil~~goods sold and ~~natural~~marketing ~~gas~~expenses ~~under~~will ~~which~~impair ~~administrative~~or ~~agencies~~prevent ~~may~~us ~~set~~from ~~allowable~~generating ~~rates~~profitable ofreturns. ~~production~~We ~~and~~recognize ~~promulgate~~that ~~rules~~if inwe ~~connection~~are ~~with~~unable ~~the~~to ~~operation~~generate ~~and~~significant ~~production~~revenues offrom ~~such~~our ~~wells~~business development, ~~ascertain~~we ~~and~~will ~~determine~~not ~~the~~be ~~reasonable~~able ~~market~~to ~~demand~~earn ofprofits ~~oil~~or ~~and~~continue ~~gas~~operations. There is limited history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will prove successful, and ~~adjust~~we ~~allowable~~may ~~rates~~not ~~with~~be ~~respect~~able ~~thereto~~to generate significant revenues or ever achieve profitability. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will most likely fail.

~~The~~Our ~~sale~~independent ofauditor ~~liquid~~has ~~hydrocarbons~~indicated ~~was~~that ~~subject~~there to federal regulation under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, which amended various acts, including the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973. These regulations and controls included mandatory restrictions upon the prices at which most domestic crude oil and various petroleum products could be sold. All price controls and restrictions on the sale of crude oil at the wellhead have been withdrawn. It is ~~possible,~~substantial ~~however,~~doubt ~~that~~about ~~such~~our ~~controls~~ability ~~may~~to becontinue ~~reimposed~~as ina ~~the~~going ~~future but when~~concern, if ~~ever~~true, ~~such~~you ~~re-imposition~~could ~~might~~lose ~~occur~~your ~~and the effect thereof on us cannot be predicted~~investment.

~~The~~Our ~~sale~~independent ofauditor ~~certain~~has ~~categories~~expressed ofsubstantial ~~natural~~doubt ~~gas~~about inour ~~interstate~~ability ~~commerce is subject~~ to ~~regulation~~continue ~~under~~as ~~the~~a ~~Natural~~going ~~Gas~~concern ~~Act~~given ~~and~~our ~~the~~limited ~~Natural~~operating ~~Gas~~history, ~~Policy~~working ~~Act~~capital ofdeficiency ~~1978~~and ~~(“NGPA”). Under~~ the ~~NGPA,~~fact athat ~~comprehensive~~we ~~set~~have ofgenerated ~~statutory~~only ~~ceiling~~limited ~~prices~~revenues ~~applies~~ to ~~all~~date. ~~first~~Potential ~~sales~~investors ofshould ~~natural~~be ~~gas~~aware ~~unless~~that ~~the~~there ~~gas~~are isdifficulties ~~specifically~~associated ~~exempt~~with ~~from~~operating ~~regulation~~a ~~(i.e.~~new business, ~~unless~~and the ~~gas~~high israte ~~“deregulated”). Administration and enforcement~~ of ~~the~~failure ~~NGPA~~associated ~~ceiling~~with ~~prices~~this ~~are~~fact. ~~delegated~~We tohave ~~the~~incurred ~~Federal~~a ~~Energy~~net ~~Regulatory~~loss ~~Commission~~of ~~(“FERC”). In June 1986~~$138,001 ~~FERC~~for ~~issued~~the ~~Order~~year ~~No.~~ended ~~451~~December 31, ~~which,~~2014. inOur ~~general,~~future is ~~designed~~dependent toupon ~~provide~~our aability ~~higher~~to ~~NGPA~~obtain ~~ceiling~~financing ~~price~~and ~~for~~upon ~~certain~~future ~~vintages~~profitable ofoperations ~~old~~from ~~gas~~our website. ItThese isfactors ~~possible~~raise substantial doubt that we ~~may~~will inbe ~~the~~able ~~future acquire significant amounts of natural gas subject~~ to ~~NGPA~~continue ~~price~~as ~~regulations~~a ~~and/or~~going ~~FERC Order No~~concern. ~~451.~~

The operations related to the Well Projects are subject to extensive and continually changing regulation because legislation affecting the oil and natural gas industry is under constant review for amendment and expansion. Many departments and agencies, both federal and state, are authorized by statute to issue and have issued rules and regulations binding on the oil and natural gas industry and its individual participants. The failure to comply with such rules and regulations can result in large penalties. The regulatory burden on this industry could increase our share of operating expenses and, therefore, affect our profitability. However, we do not believe that these regulations will have a significant negative impact on our limited operations with respect to the Well Projects.6

8Our limited operating experience and limited brand recognition in new markets may limit our expansion strategy and cause our business and growth to suffer.

~~Employees~~Our future growth depends, to an extent, on our expansion efforts. We have limited experience with regulatory environments and market practices outside of Canada, and we may not be able to penetrate or successfully operate in any new market. We may also encounter difficulty expanding into new markets because of limited brand recognition leading to delayed acceptance of products distributed by our company by customers in these new markets. Our failure to develop new markets or disappointing growth outside of existing markets will harm our business and results of operations.

We ~~have~~will norely ~~significant~~on ~~employees~~a ~~other~~third-party ~~than~~for ~~Georges~~hosting ~~Paquet, our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer~~ and ~~Director,~~maintenance ~~and~~of ~~Melany Paquet~~ our ~~Vice President and Director~~website. We ~~believe~~Any ~~that~~mismanagement ~~until~~or ~~such~~service ~~time~~interruptions ~~that~~could wesignificantly ~~have~~harm ~~fully developed~~ our ~~plan of operations we will not have any employees and that we will frequently use consultants to assist in the completion of various projects.~~ business

~~WHERE~~Our ~~YOU~~website ~~CAN~~is ~~GET~~hosted ~~ADDITIONAL~~and ~~INFORMATION~~maintained by a third party hosting service. Any mismanagement, service interruptions, or damage to the data of our company or our customers, could result in the loss of customers, or other harm to our business.

We ~~file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You~~ may ~~read~~be ~~and~~exposed ~~copy~~to ~~our~~liability ~~reports~~for orinfringing ~~other~~intellectual ~~filings~~property ~~made~~rights ~~with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain information on the operation~~ of ~~the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also access these reports and~~ other ~~filings electronically on the SEC’s web site, www.sec.gov.~~companies

~~ITEM~~Our 1Asuccess will, in part, depend on our ability to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. Although we have conducted searches and are not aware of any trademarks which our company might infringe, we cannot be certain that infringement has not or will not occur. We could incur substantial costs, in addition to the great amount of time lost, in defending any trademark infringement suits or in asserting any trademark rights, in suit with another party.

~~RISK~~Risks ~~FACTORS~~Related to our Common Stock

WeBecause ~~are~~we acan ~~smaller~~issue ~~reporting~~additional ~~company~~shares ~~as defined by Rule 12b-2~~ of ~~the~~common ~~Securities~~stock, ~~Exchange~~purchasers ~~Act~~ of ~~1934~~our ~~and~~common ~~are~~stock ~~not~~may ~~required~~incur toimmediate ~~provide~~dilution ~~the~~and ~~information~~may ~~under~~experience ~~this~~further ~~item~~dilution.

~~ITEM~~We 1Bare authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 194,528,352 common shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014. Our board of directors has the authority to cause us to issue additional shares of common stock, and to determine the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, without consent of any of our shareholders. Consequently, our shareholders may experience more dilution in their ownership of our stock in the future.

~~UNRESOLVED~~Trading ~~STAFF~~on ~~COMMENTS~~the OTC QB Marketplace may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our shareholders to resell their shares.

~~None~~Our common stock is quoted on the OTC QB Marketplace quotation system. Trading in stock quoted on the OTC QB Marketplace is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTC QB Marketplace is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTC QB Marketplace is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like NASDAQ or a stock exchange like the NYSE. Accordingly, shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of their shares.

~~ITEM~~Our 2common stock is illiquid and shareholders may be unable to sell their shares.

~~PROPERTIES~~There is currently no market for our common stock and we can provide no assurance to investors that a market will develop. If a market for our common stock does not develop, our shareholders may not be able to re-sell the shares of our common stock that they have purchased and they may lose all of their investment. Public announcements regarding our company, changes in government regulations, conditions in our market segment or changes in earnings estimates by analysts may cause the price of our common shares to fluctuate substantially. In addition, stock prices for start-up internet based companies fluctuate widely for reasons that may be unrelated to their operating results. These fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common shares.

~~Principal Executive Offices~~7

~~Our~~Penny ~~principal~~stock ~~executive~~rules ~~offices~~will ~~are~~limit ~~located at 840 23rd Street, St. Georges, Quebec, G5Y 4N6, Canada. Mr. Paquet provides~~ the ~~office~~ability ~~space~~of ~~to us at no cost. We believe~~ our ~~current~~stockholders ~~premises~~to ~~are~~sell ~~adequate~~their ~~for our current operations~~stock.

~~Oil~~The Securities and ~~Gas~~Exchange ~~Properties~~Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

OnThe ~~July~~Financial ~~25,~~Industry ~~2010,~~Regulatory ~~the Company entered into an Assignment of Oil and Gas Leases with Tim Cooksey Oil~~Authority, ~~whereby~~or ~~the Company was assigned a 1.57% working interest in and to certain oil and gas leases located in Franklin County~~FINRA, ~~Illinois~~has ~~and~~adopted ~~owned~~sales bypractice ~~Tim~~requirements ~~Cooksey Oil. The working interests were acquired for an aggregate total of $25,000,~~ which ~~covered~~may ~~the~~also ~~following~~limit ~~leases~~a asshareholder’s ~~specifically~~ability described as: (i) Charles Prior #1A, West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Franklin County, Illinois; (ii) Charles Prior #2A, West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Franklin County, Illinois; (the foregoing leased properties are referred to ~~herein~~buy as the "Charles Prior Project"). These properties are located in the Illinois Basin approximately 100 miles southeast of St. Louis, Missouri. Local production is predominantly from the Aux Vases Sandston and ~~the~~sell ~~St.~~our ~~Genevieve Limestone at a depth less than 3300 feet~~stock.

OnIn ~~November~~addition ~~17,~~to ~~2010~~the “penny stock” rules described above, ~~the~~FINRA ~~Company~~has ~~entered~~adopted ~~into~~rules that require that in recommending an ~~Assignment~~investment ofto ~~Oil~~a ~~and~~customer, ~~Gas~~a ~~Leases~~broker-dealer ~~with~~must ~~JKV~~have ~~Oil~~reasonable ~~Development,~~grounds ~~whereby~~for ~~the~~believing ~~Company~~that ~~was~~the ~~assigned~~investment ais 3%suitable ~~working~~for ~~interest~~that incustomer. ~~and~~Prior to arecommending ~~certain~~speculative ~~oil~~low ~~and~~priced ~~gas~~securities ~~lease~~to ~~located~~their innon-institutional ~~Franklin County~~customers, ~~Illinois~~broker-dealers ~~and~~must ~~owned~~make byreasonable ~~JKV~~efforts ~~Oil~~to ~~Development.~~obtain ~~The~~information ~~working~~about ~~interest~~the ~~was~~customer’s ~~acquired~~financial ~~for~~status, antax ~~aggregate~~status, ~~total~~investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of ~~$25~~these rules,~~000,~~ ~~which~~FINRA ~~covered~~believes ~~the~~that ~~following~~there ~~lease~~is asa ~~specifically~~high ~~described~~probability asthat ~~the~~speculative ~~Sesser~~low ~~Wells~~priced ~~located~~securities atwill ~~Section~~not 20be ofsuitable ~~the~~for ~~Northeast~~at ~~Quarter~~least ~~and~~some ~~the~~customers. ~~Southwest~~FINRA ~~Quarter~~requirements ofmake ~~the~~it ~~Northeast~~more ~~Quarter~~difficult offor ~~the~~broker-dealers ~~East~~to ~~One~~recommend ~~Half~~that oftheir ~~the~~customers ~~Southeast~~buy ~~Quarter~~our ofcommon ~~the~~stock, ~~Northeast~~which ~~Quarter~~may ~~(Sec.~~limit 20your ~~T5S,~~ability ~~R2E),~~to ~~(the~~buy ~~foregoing~~and ~~leased~~sell ~~property~~our isstock ~~referred~~and tohave ~~herein~~an asadverse effect on the ~~"Sesser~~market ~~Wells").~~for its shares

ITEM 31B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

~~LEGAL~~Not ~~PROCEEDINGS~~required.

WeITEM ~~know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our Company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation~~2. ~~There~~ ~~are no proceedings in which our director, officer or any affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.~~PROPERTIES

~~ITEM~~Principal 4.Executive Offices

~~MINE~~Our ~~SAFETY~~principal ~~DISCLOSURES~~executive offices are administered out of 2360 Corporate Circle, Suite 400, Henderson, Nevada. Concurrent with our change in directors, we have closed our Surrey office and distribution location, and all of our company’s operations are now administered outside of Canada. We currently do not have an office location. We pay approximately $240 per year for web hosting services.

~~Not~~Our ~~applicable~~registered agent for service is Incorp Services, Inc., 2360 Corporate Circle, Ste 400, Henderson, NV 89074-7739.

9Intellectual Property

~~PART~~The IIdescription of our intellectual property rights is under the section entitled “Intellectual Property”.

ITEM 53. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~MARKET~~We ~~FOR~~know ~~THE~~of ~~COMPANY’S~~no ~~COMMON~~material, ~~EQUITY~~existing or pending legal proceedings against our Company, ~~RELATED~~nor ~~STOCKHOLDER~~are ~~MATTERS~~we ~~AND~~involved ~~ISSUER~~as ~~PURCHASES~~a OFplaintiff ~~EQUITY~~in ~~SECURITIES~~any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which our director, officer or any affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

~~Common Stock~~ 8

AsITEM ~~of October 24, 2012, there is no public market for our Common Stock~~4. WeMINE ~~intend~~SAFETY ~~to contact an authorized OTC Bulletin Board market-maker for sponsorship of our securities on the OTC Bulletin Board.~~ DISCLOSURES

~~Record~~Not ~~Holders~~applicable.

AsPART of October 24, 2012, there were 119,528,352 shares of the registrant’s $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding and were owned by approximately 44 holders of record, based on information provided by our transfer agent.II

~~None.~~Common Stock

~~Re-Purchases~~Our ofcommon ~~Equity~~stock ~~Securities~~is not traded on any exchange. Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC QB Marketplace under the trading symbol “MJMI”. Trading in stocks quoted on the OTC QB Marketplace is often thin and is characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may have little to do with a company’s operations or business prospects. We cannot assure you that there will be a market for our common stock in the future.

~~None~~OTC QB Marketplace securities are not listed or traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC QB Marketplace securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks. OTC QB Marketplace issuers are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a regional or national stock exchange.

~~Dividends~~During the year ended December 31, 2013, no shares of our common stock traded.

OnSet ~~May~~forth ~~29,~~below ~~2012,~~are the ~~Board~~range of ~~Directors~~high ofand ~~the~~low ~~Company~~bid ~~authorized~~quotations ~~the~~for ~~issuance of a dividend (~~the ~~“Forward~~periods ~~Split”)~~indicated ~~to its shareholders, payable~~ as areported ~~12-for-1~~by ~~forward split of~~ the ~~issued~~Yahoo! ~~and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company for all shareholders of record on the close of business on May 25, 2012~~Finance. AsThe amarket ~~result~~quotations ofreflect ~~the~~inter-dealer ~~Forward Split~~prices, ~~the~~without ~~issued~~retail ~~and outstanding shares of common stock increased from 6~~mark-up,~~428,571~~ tomark-down ~~77,142,852.~~or ~~The~~commissions ~~Forward~~and ~~Split~~may ~~shares~~not ~~are~~necessarily ~~payable~~represent ~~upon~~actual ~~surrender of certificates to the Company’s transfer agent~~transactions.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock since inception and presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our business and that no dividends on our Common Stock will be declared in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and other pertinent facts. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on our Common Stock will be paid in the future.


Quarter Ended	Bid High	Bid Low	Volume
September 30, 2014	$0.26	$0.10	3,800
December 31, 2014	$0.40	$0.11	300

~~Securities~~Transfer ~~Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans~~Agent

~~None~~The shares of our common stock are issued in registered form. The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Action Stock Transfer located at 2469 E Fort Union Blvd, Suite 214, Salt Lake City, UT 84121.

~~ITEM~~Record 6.Holders

~~SELECTED~~As ~~FINANCIAL~~of ~~DATA~~March 30, 2015, there were 194,528,352 shares of the registrant’s $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding and were owned by approximately 55 holders of record, based on information provided by our transfer agent.

WeRecent ~~are~~Sales ~~a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2~~ of ~~the~~Unregistered Securities ~~Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.~~

10Our company has sold the following securities within the last three fiscal years on an unregistered basis:

~~ITEM 7.~~a)

~~MANAGEMENT'~~Effective March 28, 2013, we issued 75,000,000 shares of our common stock to MJM shareholders pursuant to Regulation S ~~DISCUSSION~~of ~~AND~~the ~~ANALYSIS~~1933 OFAct, ~~FINANCIAL~~each ~~CONDITION~~of ~~AND~~whom ~~RESULTS~~represented OFthat ~~OPERATIONS~~they were not a “U.S. person” as such term is defined in Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

~~This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”~~b) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

~~RESULTS~~Effective OFMarch ~~OPERATIONS~~28, 2013, we issued 106,651,250 Special Voting Shares to the Trustee pursuant to Regulation S of the 1933 Act, and the Trustee represented he was not a “U.S. person” as such term is defined in Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

~~Working~~Issuer ~~Capital~~Purchases of Equity Securities

	July 31, 2012 $	July 31, 2011 $
Current Assets	414,546	11,005
Current Liabilities	95,733	61,695
Working Capital (Deficit)	318,813	(50,690)

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, we did not purchase any of our equity securities.

~~Cash Flows~~9

	Year ended July 31, 2012 $	Year ended July 31, 2011 $
Cash Flows from used in Operating Activities	(44,814)	(18,980)
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities	-	(25,000)
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities	443,355	45,000
Net Increase in Cash During Period	398,541	1,020

Dividends

~~Operating~~We ~~Revenues~~have never declared or paid any cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to support operations and to finance expansion and therefore we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

~~Operating~~Securities ~~revenues~~Authorized for ~~the~~Issuance ~~period~~Under ~~ended~~Equity ~~July~~Compensation ~~31, 2012 was $(1,411).~~Plans

~~Operating~~As ~~revenues~~at ~~for~~ the ~~period~~date ~~ended~~of ~~July~~this 31report, ~~2011~~we ~~was~~did ~~$(893)~~not have any equity compensation plans in place.

~~Operating~~ITEM ~~Expenses~~6. ~~and~~SELECTED ~~Net~~FINANCIAL ~~Loss~~DATA

~~Operating~~We ~~expenses~~are ~~for~~a ~~the~~smaller ~~years~~reporting ~~ended~~company ~~July~~as ~~31,~~defined ~~2012~~by ~~and~~Rule ~~2011~~12b-2 ~~was~~of ~~$54,110~~the ~~and~~Securities ~~$36,656~~Exchange ~~and~~Act isof ~~comprised~~1934 ofand ~~expenses~~are ~~related~~not required to ~~mineral~~provide ~~claims~~the ~~and~~information ~~general~~under ~~and~~this ~~administrative expenses~~item.

~~Net~~ITEM ~~loss~~7. ~~for~~MANAGEMENT'S ~~the~~DISCUSSION ~~years~~AND ~~ended~~ANALYSIS ~~July~~OF ~~31,~~FINANCIAL ~~2012~~CONDITION ~~and~~AND ~~2011~~RESULTS ~~was~~OF ~~$(54,352) and $(36,162) is comprised of expenses related to mineral claims and general and administrative expenses.~~OPERATIONS

~~Liquidity~~This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and ~~Capital~~Section ~~Resources~~21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

AsResults atof July 31, 2012, the Company’s cash and total current asset balance was $414,546 compared to $11,005 as at July 31, 2011. The increase in total assets is attributed to increased share capital investments from shareholders. Operations

AsThe atfollowing ~~July~~summary ~~31, 2012, the Company had total liabilities~~ of ~~$95,733~~our ~~compared~~results ~~with total liabilities~~ of ~~$61,695~~operations asshould atbe ~~July~~read ~~31,~~in ~~2011. The~~conjunction ~~increase~~with inour ~~total~~audited ~~liabilities~~consolidated ~~was~~financial ~~attributed~~statements tofor ~~increased~~the ~~funding~~fiscal ~~received~~year byended aDecember ~~related~~30, ~~party~~2014, ofwhich ~~the~~are ~~Company~~included herein.


	Year Ended	Year Ended
	December 31,	December 31,
	2014	2013
	$	$
Revenue	–	1,704
Cost of Goods Sold	–	1,954
Gross Profit	–	(250)
Total Operating Expenses	132,821	283,977
Interest Expense	(5,180)	(5,814)
Net Loss	(138,001)	(290,041)

AsRevenues ~~at July 31, 2012, the Company had a working capital of $318,813 compared with a working capital deficit of 50,690 as at July 31, 2011.~~

~~Cashflow~~We ~~from~~recorded ~~Operating~~a ~~Activities~~net loss of $138,001 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and have an accumulated deficit of $634,259 since inception. We have had $nil in operating revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

During the period ended July 31, 2012, the Company used $44,814 of cash for operating activities compared to the use of $18,980 of cash for operating activities during the period ended July 31, 2011. The change in net cash used in operating activities is attributed to increase in operating expenses. 10

~~Cashflow from Investing Activities~~Expenses

NoOur ~~cash~~operating ~~was~~expenses ~~used~~for ~~in investing activities during~~ the fiscal year ended ~~July~~December 31, ~~2012~~2014 asand ~~compared~~2013 toare ~~$25,000~~outlined ~~used during the year ended July 31, 2011.~~below:

Cashflow from Financing Activities


	Year Ended December 31, 2014 $	Year Ended December 31, 2013 $
Operating Expenses
Advertising and promotion	979	53,018
Automotive	81	3,224
Consulting	13,000	–
Foreign exchange loss	20,533	16,483
General and administrative	14,395	55,819
Impairment of oil and gas properties	50,000	–
Management fees	2,445	54,376
Professional fees	30,774	67,322
Rent	–	7,035
Travel	–	6,778
Website costs	614	19,922
Total Operating Expenses	132,821	283,977

~~During~~Fiscal ~~the~~year ~~period~~ ended ~~July~~December 31, ~~2012,~~2014 ~~the Company received $443,355 of cash from financing activities~~ compared to ~~$45,000~~Fiscal ~~for~~year ~~the period~~ ended ~~July~~December 31, ~~2011. The change in financing activities is attributed to additional equity financing~~2013

~~Going~~Advertising ~~Concern~~and promotion costs decreased to $979 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $53,018 for the year ended December 31, 2013, due to decreased marketing and advertising expenditures.

WeGeneral ~~have not attained profitable operations~~ and ~~are~~administrative ~~dependent~~costs ~~upon~~decreased ~~obtaining financing~~ to ~~pursue~~$14,395 ~~any~~for ~~extensive~~the ~~acquisitions~~year ~~and~~ended ~~activities. For~~December ~~these reasons~~31, ~~our~~2014 ~~auditors~~from ~~stated~~$55,819 infor ~~their~~the ~~report~~year onended ~~our~~December 31, ~~audited~~2013, ~~financial~~due ~~statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able~~ to ~~continue~~decreased asadministrative aand ~~going~~office ~~concern without further financing~~costs.

~~Off-Balance~~Professional ~~Sheet~~fees ~~Arrangements~~decreased to $30,774 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $67,322 for the year ended December 31, 2013, due to more legal expenses incurred in the prior fiscal year in connection with our acquisition of MJM.

WeManagement ~~have~~fees nodecreased ~~significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely~~ to ~~have~~$2,445 afor ~~current~~the oryear ~~future~~ended ~~effect~~December ~~on our financial condition~~31, ~~changes~~2014 infrom ~~financial condition~~$54,376 ~~revenues~~for orthe ~~expenses,~~year ~~results~~ended ofDecember ~~operations~~31, ~~liquidity~~2013, ~~capital~~to ~~expenditures~~reflect ordecreased ~~capital resources that are material to stockholders~~operations.

~~Future~~Website ~~Financings~~costs decreased to $614 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $19,922 for the year ended December 31, 2013, due to decreased website maintenance costs.

WeLiquidity will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our operations and ~~other~~Capital ~~activities.~~Resources

~~Critical~~We ~~Accounting~~are ~~Policies~~in the early stages of our business and we are not self-sustainable from a cash perspective. We are required to fund our operating activities from the generation of financing activities, and we rely on a combination of equity and debt financings.

Our financial ~~statements~~condition ~~and~~as ~~accompanying~~at ~~notes~~December ~~have~~31, ~~been~~2014 prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and ~~assumptions~~2013 ~~that affect the reported amounts of assets~~ and ~~liabilities,~~ the ~~disclosure~~changes ofbetween ~~contingent~~those ~~assets~~periods ~~and~~for ~~liabilities at~~ the ~~date~~respective ofitems ~~the~~are ~~financial~~summarized ~~statements~~as ~~and~~follows: ~~the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.~~

WeWorking ~~regularly~~Capital evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in the notes to our financial statements. In general, management's estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

Contractual Obligations


	Year Ended December 31, 2014 $	Year Ended December 31, 2013 $
Total Current Assets	8,510	59,365
Total Liabilities	188,866	181,437
Working Capital (Deficit)	(180,356)	(122,072)

~~We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.~~11

~~Recently~~Our ~~Issued~~current ~~Accounting~~assets ~~Pronouncements~~decreased by 86% primarily due to operating expenses incurred in the current fiscal quarter. The net working capital deficit position increased by 48% because of expenditures undertaken during the current fiscal year, and increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

~~The~~Cash Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial statements. Flows

ITEM 7A.


	Year Ended December 31, 2014 $	Year Ended December 31, 2013 $
Net Loss For the Year	(138,001)	(290,041)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(75,682)	(242,243)
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities	2,351	269,733
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash	22,694	11,494
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash	(50,637)	38,984
Cash, End of Year	6,078	56,715

~~QUANTITATIVE~~During ~~AND~~the ~~QUALITATIVE~~year ~~DISCLOSURES~~ended ~~ABOUT~~December ~~MARKET~~31, ~~RISK~~2014, we used net cash in operating activities in the amount of $75,682 compared to $242,243 used during the year ended December 31, 2013. The cash used in the current period by our operating activities decreased because of decreased operating expenditures . The cash used in the current period by our operating activities was primarily represented by professional fees and our administrative costs.

We During ~~are~~the ayear ~~smaller~~ended ~~reporting~~December ~~company~~31, as2014, ~~defined~~investing byactivities ~~Rule~~provided ~~12b-2~~cash in the amount of $2,351 compared to $269,733 provided during the ~~Securities~~year ~~Exchange~~ended ~~Act~~December of31, ~~1934~~2013. The cash provided in the current period represent restricted cash. Cash flows provided by investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013 represent restricted cash and ~~are~~net ~~not~~cash ~~required~~acquired toon ~~provide~~recapitalization, following the ~~information~~closing ~~under~~of ~~this~~the ~~item~~Share Exchange Agreement on March 28, 2013.

12Disclosure of Outstanding Share Data

~~ITEM~~Exchangeable 8.Preferred Shares

~~FINANCIAL~~Pursuant ~~STATEMENTS~~to ~~AND~~the ~~SUPPLEMENTARY~~Transaction, ~~DATA~~we issued 106,651,250 Exchangeable Preferred Shares in the capital of MarilynJean Holdings Inc., a private British Columbia corporation wholly-owned by us to certain former shareholders of MJM. Each Exchangeable Preferred Share can be exchanged for one common share of our company subject to the rights and restrictions of the Exchangeable Preferred Shares.

~~Future~~Additional ~~Energy~~Disclosure ~~Corp.~~for Venture Issuers Without Significant Revenue

(An Exploration Stage Company)


	Year Ended	Year Ended
	December 31, 2014	December 31, 2013
General and administrative	14,395	55,819

~~July~~Going ~~31, 2012~~Concern

Index
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F–2
Balance Sheets	F–3
Statements of Operations	F–4
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	F–5
Statements of Cash Flows	F–6
Notes to the Financial Statements	F–7

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that our company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Our company has not generated substantial revenues since inception and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate future. The continuation of our company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from our shareholders, the ability of our company to obtain necessary equity financing to achieve our operating objectives, and the attainment of profitable operations. As of December 31, 2014, we had cash of $ 6,078, a working capital deficit of 180,356, and an accumulated deficit of $634,259. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the explanatory paragraph to our independent auditors’ report on our most recent audited financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

~~F-1~~The continuation of our business is dependent upon us raising additional financial support. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

~~REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~12

ToFuture ~~the Board of Directors~~Financings

~~Future~~We ~~Energy~~recorded a net loss of $138,001 ~~Corp~~for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and have an accumulated deficit of $634,259 since inception. As of December 31, 2014, we had cash of $6,078 (December 31, 2013 - $56,715). We anticipate continuing to rely on equity sales of our common shares or shareholder loans in order to continue to fund our business operations and/or exercises of the warrants comprising a portion of the units we previously registered. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to our existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our planned activities.

~~(An~~Off ~~Exploration~~Balance ~~Stage~~Sheet ~~Company)~~Arrangements

~~Canada~~We ~~G5Y~~have ~~4N6~~no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

WeCritical ~~have~~Accounting audited the accompanying balance sheets of Future Energy Corporation (an exploration stage company) (the “Company”) as of July 31, 2012 and July 31, 2011 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 and the period from April 6, 2010 (inception) through July 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.Policies

WeOur ~~conducted~~consolidated ~~our~~financial ~~audits~~statements inand ~~accordance~~accompanying ~~with~~notes ~~standards~~have ofbeen ~~the~~prepared ~~Public~~in ~~Company~~accordance ~~Accounting~~with ~~Oversight Board (~~United States). ~~Those~~generally ~~standards~~accepted ~~require~~accounting ~~that~~principles weapplied ~~plan~~on ~~and~~a ~~perform~~consistent ~~the~~basis. The ~~audit~~preparation toof ~~obtain reasonable assurance about whether the~~ financial statements ~~are~~in ~~free~~conformity ofwith ~~material misstatements~~U.S. ~~The~~generally ~~Company~~accepted isaccounting ~~not~~principles ~~required~~requires tomanagement ~~have, nor were we engaged~~ to ~~perform,~~make anestimates ~~audit~~and ofassumptions ~~its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures~~ that ~~are~~affect ~~appropriate in~~ the ~~circumstances,~~reported ~~but~~amounts ~~not for the purpose~~ of ~~expressing~~assets anand ~~opinion~~liabilities, on the ~~effectiveness~~disclosure of ~~the~~contingent ~~Company’s~~assets ~~internal~~and ~~control~~liabilities ~~over~~at ~~financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting~~ the ~~amounts~~date ~~and~~of ~~disclosures in~~ the financial statements. Anand ~~audit also includes assessing~~ the ~~accounting~~reported ~~principles~~amounts ~~used~~of revenues and ~~significant~~expenses ~~estimates~~during ~~made by management, as well as evaluating~~ the ~~overall~~reporting ~~financial statement presentation~~periods. ~~We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.~~

InWe ~~our~~regularly ~~opinion,~~evaluate the ~~financial~~accounting ~~statements~~policies ~~referred~~and toestimates ~~above~~that ~~present~~we ~~fairly,~~use into ~~all~~prepare ~~material~~our ~~respects,~~consolidated ~~the~~ financial ~~position~~statements. A ofcomplete ~~the~~summary ~~Company as~~ of ~~July~~these ~~31,~~policies ~~2012~~is ~~and~~included ~~July~~in ~~31,~~the ~~2011~~notes ~~and~~to ~~the~~our ~~related~~financial ~~results~~statements. In ofgeneral, ~~its~~management's ~~operations~~estimates ~~and~~are ~~its~~based ~~cash~~on ~~flows~~historical ~~for~~experience, ~~the~~on ~~year~~information ~~ended~~from ~~July~~third 31party professionals, ~~2012~~ and ~~the~~on ~~period~~various ~~from~~other ~~April~~assumptions 6,that ~~2010~~are ~~(inception)~~believed ~~through~~to ~~July~~be ~~31,~~reasonable ~~2012~~under inthe ~~conformity~~facts ~~with~~and ~~accounting~~circumstances. Actual ~~principles~~results ~~generally~~could ~~accepted~~differ infrom ~~the~~those ~~United~~estimates ~~States~~made ofby ~~America~~management.

~~The~~Contractual accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred losses from operation since inception. This factor raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.Obligations

~~/s/~~We ~~MaloneBailey,~~are ~~LLP~~a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

~~www.malone-bailey.com~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

~~Houston~~ The Company has limited operations and is considered to be in the development stage. In the year ended December 31, ~~Texas~~2014, the Company elected to early adopt Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements”. The adoption of this ASU allows the Company to remove the inception to date information and all references to development stage.

~~October~~The ~~29,~~Company ~~2012~~has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial statements.

~~F-2~~ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

~~Future~~We ~~Energy~~are ~~Corp~~a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

~~(An~~ITEM ~~Exploration~~8. ~~Stage~~FINANCIAL ~~Company)~~STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

~~Balance Sheets~~13

ASSETS		July 31, 2012		July 31, 2011
Current Assets
Cash	$	409,546	$	11,005
Subscription Receivable		5,000		-
Total Current Assets		414,546		11,005
Oil and gas properties
Unproved property		50,000		50,000
Total Assets	$	464,546	$	61,005
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	12,919	$	14,069
Accrued Liabilities		17,798		7,110
Due to related parties		516		516
Total Current Liabilities		31,233		21,695
Loan payable to related party		64,500		40,000
Total Liabilities		95,733		61,695
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Preferred stock Authorized: 200,000,000 shares, par value $0.001 none shares issued and outstanding		-		-
Common stock Authorized: 500,000,000 shares, par value $0.001 119,528,352 and 77,142,852 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		119,528		77,143
Additional Paid-in Capital		349,327		(32,143)
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(100,042)		(45,690)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		368,813		(690)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	464,546	$	61,005

MARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.

~~(The~~Consolidated ~~accompanying~~Financial ~~notes are an integral part of these audited financial statements)~~Statements

~~F-3~~December 31, 2014

~~Future~~(Expressed ~~Energy~~in ~~Corp.~~US dollars)

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~ Index

~~Statement~~Report of ~~Operations~~Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

		Year Ended July 31, 2012		Year Ended July 31, 2011		April 6, 2010 (Inception) to July 31, 2012
Revenue	$	1,411	$	893	$	2,304
Lease Operating Expense		-		138		138
General and administrative		54,110		36,518		100,156
Total Operating Expenses		54,110		36,656		100,294
Total Operating Loss Before Interest		(52,699)		(35,763)		(97,990)
Interest expense		(1,653)		(399)		(2,052)
Net Loss	$	(54,352)	$	(36,162)	$	(100,042)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		7,459,000		7,142,852

F–2

~~(The~~Consolidated ~~accompanying~~Balance ~~notes are an integral part of these audited financial statements)~~Sheets

F-4–3

~~Future~~Consolidated ~~Energy~~Statements ~~Corp.~~of Operations

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~F–4

~~Statement~~Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

~~For the period from April 6, 2010 (Inception) to July 31, 2012~~F–5

									Deficit
									Accumulated
					Additional				During the
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Subscription		Development
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Receivable		Stage		Total
Balance, April 6, 2010 (Date of Inception)	–	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	–
Common stock issued for cash	68,571,432		68,572		(28,572)		–		–		40,000
Subscription receivable related to common stock	8,571,420		8,571		(3,571)		(5,000)		–		–
Net loss	–		–		–		–		(9,528)		(9,528)
Balance - July 31, 2010	77,142,852		77,143		(32,143)		(5,000)		(9,528)		30,472
Collection of subscription receivable	–		–		–		5,000		–		5,000
Net loss	–		–		–		–		(36,162)		(36,162)
Balance – July 31, 2011	77,142,852	$	77,143	$	(32,143)	$	–	$	(45,690)	$	(690)
Common stock issued for cash	41,885,500		41,885		376,970		–		–		418,855
Subscription receivable related to common stock	500,000		500		4,500		–		–		5,000
Net loss	–		–		–		–		(54,352)		(54,352)
Balance – July 31, 2012	119,528,352	$	119,528	$	349,327	$	–	$	(100,042)	$	368,813

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F-5–6

~~Future~~Notes ~~Energy~~to the Consolidated Financial Statements

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~F–7

~~Statement of Cash Flows~~F-1

~~(Unaudited)~~To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

		Year Ended July 31, 2012		Year Ended July 31, 2011		April 6, 2010 (Inception) to July 31, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(54,352)	$	(36,162)	$	(100,042)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		-		1,073		-
Accounts payable		(1,150)		14,069		12,919
Accrued expenses		10,688		2,040		17,798
Net cash used in operating activities		(44,814)		(18,980)		(69,325)
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of property		-		(25,000)		(50,000)
Net cash used in investing activities		-		(25,000)		(50,000)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		418,855		5,000		463,855
Proceeds from loan payable to related party		24,500		40,000		64,500
Due to related parties		-		-		516
Net cash provided by financing activities		443,355		45,000		528,871
Net increase in cash		398,541		1,020		409,546
Cash, beginning of period		11,005		9,985		-
Cash, end of period		409,546		11,005		409,546
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Subscription receivable	$	5,000	$	-	$	5,000
Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid	$	-	$	-	$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-	$	-

MarilynJean Interactive Inc. (the “Company”)

~~F-6~~We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MarilynJean Interactive Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

~~Future~~We ~~Energy~~conducted ~~Corp~~our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~(An~~In ~~Exploration~~our ~~Stage~~opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

~~Notes~~The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the ~~Financial~~consolidated ~~Statements~~financial statements, the Company has not generated significant revenues, has a working capital deficiency, and has incurred operating losses since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

1./s/ Saturna Group Chartered Accountants LLP

~~Nature~~Saturna ofGroup ~~Operations~~Chartered ~~and~~Accountants ~~Continuance of Business~~LLP

~~Future Energy Corp. (“we”~~Vancouver, “our”, the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on April 6, 2010. The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and has not commenced business operations. The company complies with statements of Financial Accounting Standard ASC 915-15 and the Securities and Exchange Commission Exchange Act 7 for its characterization of the company as an exploration stage company.Canada

2.March 30, 2014

~~Going Concern~~F-2

~~These~~MARILYNJEAN ~~financial~~INTERACTIVE ~~statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize it assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business~~INC. During the period ended July 31, 2012, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $100,042. The Company is in the business of exploiting and developing natural resources. The Company participates in and invests in development projects with other companies across a wide range of natural resources. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

3.Consolidated Balance Sheets

~~Summary~~(Expressed ofin ~~Significant~~US ~~Accounting Policies~~dollars)


	December 31, 2014 $	December 31, 2013 $

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash	6,078	56,715
Amounts receivable	2,432	2,650

Total Current Assets	8,510	59,365

Restricted cash (Note 4)	–	2,351
Oil and gas properties (Note 5)	–	50,000

Total Assets	8,510	111,716

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities

Accounts payable	51,452	46,897
Accrued liabilities	20,896	13,350
Loans payable (Note 6)	51,502	56,174
Due to related parties (Note 7)	65,016	65,016

Total Liabilities	188,866	181,437

Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business (Note 1)

Stockholders’ Deficit

Preferred stock Authorized: 200,000,000 shares, par value $0.001 Issued and outstanding: nil	–	–

Common stock Authorized: 500,000,000 shares, par value $0.001 Issued and outstanding: 194,528,352 shares	194,528	194,528

Additional paid-in capital	216,444	216,444

Share subscriptions receivable (Note 8)	(1,038)	(1,038)

Accumulated other comprehensive income	43,969	16,603

Deficit	(634,259)	(496,258)

Total Stockholders’ Deficit	(180,356)	(69,721)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	8,510	111,716

~~Basis of Presentation~~F-3

~~These~~MARILYNJEAN ~~financial~~INTERACTIVE ~~statements and notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States~~INC. ~~The Company’s fiscal year end is July 31.~~

b)Consolidated Statements of Operations

~~Use~~(Expressed ofin ~~Estimates~~US dollars)

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States necessarily requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. We regularly evaluate estimates and judgments based on historical experience and other relevant facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


	Year Ended December 31, 2014 $	Year Ended December 31, 2013 $

Revenue	–	1,704

Cost of goods sold	–	1,954

Gross Profit (Loss)	–	(250)

Operating Expenses

Advertising and promotion	979	53,018
Automotive	81	3,224
Consulting	13,000	–
Foreign exchange loss	20,533	16,483
General and administrative	14,395	55,819
Impairment of oil and gas properties (Note 5)	50,000	–
Management fees (Note 7)	2,445	54,376
Professional fees	30,774	67,322
Rent	–	7,035
Travel	–	6,778
Website costs	614	19,922

Total Operating Expenses	132,821	283,977

Loss Before Other Expense	(132,821)	(284,227)

Other Expense

Interest expense	(5,180)	(5,814)

Net Loss	(138,001)	(290,041)

Net Loss Per Share, Basic and Diluted	–	–

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding	194,528,352	174,033,019

c)F-4

~~Cash~~MARILYNJEAN ~~and~~INTERACTIVE ~~Cash Equivalents~~INC.

~~The~~Consolidated ~~Company~~Statements ~~considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity~~ of ~~three~~Stockholders’ ~~months~~Equity ~~or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.~~ (Deficit)

d(Expressed in US dollars)

Oil and Gas Properties


	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital	Share Subscriptions Receivable	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	Deficit	Total
		Amount		Amount	Additional Paid-in Capital	Share Subscriptions Receivable	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	Deficit	Total
	#	$	#	$	$	$	$	$	$

Balance, December 31, 2012	–	–	74,999,250	74,999	(954)	–	99	(206,217)	(132,073)

Shares issued for cash	-	-	106,652,000	106,652	(105,614)	(1,038)	–	–	–

March 25, 2013 – recapitalization transactions

Shares of Future Energy Corp.	–	–	119,528,352	119,528	(119,528)	–	–	–	–

Shares exchanged for exchangeable preferred shares in MarilynJean Holdings Inc. (Note 3)	–	–	(106,651,250)	(106,651)	106,651	–	–	–	–

Net assets acquired on reverse merger	–	–	–	–	335,889	–	–	–	335,889

Foreign exchange translation	–	–	–	–	–	–	16,504	–	16,504

Net loss for the year	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(290,041)	(290,041)

Balance, December 31, 2013	–	–	194,528,352	194,528	216,444	(1,038)	16,603	(496,258)	(69,721)

Foreign exchange translation gain	–	–	–	–	–	–	27,366	–	27,366

Net loss for the year	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(138,001)	(138,001)

Balance, December 31, 2014	–	–	194,528,352	194,528	216,444	(1,038)	43,969	(634,259)	(180,356)

The Company applies the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Under the successful efforts method, exploration costs such as exploratory geological and geophysical costs, delay rentals and exploration overhead are charged against earnings as incurred. Acquisition costs and costs of drilling exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether proved reserves can be attributed to the area as a result of drilling the well. If management determines that commercial quantities of hydrocarbons have not been discovered, capitalized costs associated with exploratory wells are charged to exploration expense. Acquisition costs of unproved leaseholds are assessed for impairment during the holding period and transferred to proved oil and gas properties to the extent associated with successful exploration activities. Significant undeveloped leases are assessed individually for impairment, based on the Company’s current exploration plans, and a valuation allowance is provided if impairment is indicated.F-5

~~Depreciation,~~MARILYNJEAN ~~depletion~~INTERACTIVE ~~and amortization of the cost of proved oil and gas properties are calculated using the unit-of-production method~~INC. The reserve base used to calculate depreciation, depletion and amortization is the sum of proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves for leasehold acquisition costs and the cost to acquire proved properties. With respect to lease and well equipment costs, which include development costs and successful exploration drilling costs, the reserve base includes only proved developed reserves. Estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, are taken into account. Our current properties have minimal production and are considered unproved as of July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2012 and as such are not subject to depletion until such time they are further developed and determined to be proved or impaired.

~~F-7~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

~~Future~~(Expressed ~~Energy~~in ~~Corp.~~US dollars)

(An Exploration Stage Company)


	Year Ended December 31, 2014 $	Year Ended December 31, 2013 $

Operating Activities

Net loss for the year	(138,001)	(290,041)

Items not involving cash:

Impairment of oil and gas properties	50,000	–

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable	218	10,996
Accounts payable	4,555	26,495
Accrued liabilities	7,546	10,307

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(75,682)	(242,243)

Investing Activities

Restricted cash	2,351	2,675
Net cash acquired on recapitalization	–	267,058

Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities	2,351	269,733

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash	22,694	11,494

Increase (Decrease) in Cash	(50,637)	38,984

Cash, Beginning of Year	56,715	17,731

Cash, End of Year	6,078	56,715

Supplemental Disclosures:

Interest paid	–	–
Income taxes paid	–	–

~~Notes to the Financial Statements~~F-6

3MARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.

~~Summary~~Notes ofto ~~Significant~~the ~~Accounting~~consolidated ~~Policies~~financial ~~(continued)~~statements

~~Amortization~~December ~~rates are updated to reflect: 1) the addition of capital costs~~31, ~~2) reserve revisions (upwards or downwards) and additions, 3) property acquisitions and/or property dispositions and 4) impairments.~~2014

~~The~~(Expressed ~~Company reviews its proved properties~~ in ~~accordance~~US ~~with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC~~dollars) 932-360, Extractive Activities Oil & Gas, Property, Plant, and Equipment (ASC 360). ASC 360 requires the Company to evaluate property and equipment as an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the property and equipment below the carrying amount. If the carrying amount of property and equipment is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, then the Company would recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the discounted cash flow. Unproved properties are also evaluated under ASC 932-360 periodically by management to determine whether they have been impaired. A property would likely be impaired, for example, if a dry hole has been drilled on it and the entity has no firm plans to continue drilling. Also, the likelihood of partial or total impairment of a property increases as the expiration of the lease term approaches if drilling activity has not commenced on the property or on nearby properties. If the results of the assessment indicate impairment, a loss shall be recognized by providing a valuation allowance.

~~In fiscal year ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 there was no impairment of our oil and gas properties~~1.

e)Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business

~~Asset~~Future ~~Retirement~~Energy ~~Obligations~~Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 6, 2010. The name was changed to MarilynJean Interactive Inc. on April 4, 2013.

InThe ~~August~~Company ~~2001,~~had previously been in the ~~FASB~~exploration ~~issued~~stage ~~ASC~~since ~~410-20,~~its ~~“Accounting~~formation ~~for~~and ~~Asset~~had ~~Retirement~~not ~~Obligations”~~commenced ~~(ASC~~any ~~410-20)~~exploration activities. ~~ASC~~ ~~410-20~~On ~~requires~~March ~~that~~25, 2013, the ~~fair~~Company ~~value~~entered ofinto ana ~~asset~~share ~~retirement~~exchange ~~cost,~~agreement ~~and~~with ~~corresponding~~MarilynJean ~~liability,~~Media ~~should~~Inc. be(“MJM") ~~recorded~~which asis ~~part~~in of the ~~cost~~business of ~~the~~selling ~~related~~children’s ~~long-lived~~products ~~asset~~via ~~and~~the ~~subsequently~~internet. ~~allocated~~Refer to ~~expense~~Note ~~using a systematic and rational method~~3.

f)These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize it assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company has not generated significant revenues, has a working capital deficit of $180,356, and has an accumulated deficit of $634,259. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

~~Impairment of Long-lived Assets~~2.

InSummary ~~accordance~~of ~~with~~Significant ~~ASC 360-10,~~ Accounting ~~for~~Principles Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount of the fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

g(a)

~~Foreign~~Basis ~~Currency~~of ~~Translation~~Presentation

~~The~~These consolidated financial statements ~~are~~of ~~presented~~the inCompany ~~United~~have ~~States~~been ~~dollars. In~~prepared in accordance with ~~ASC~~accounting ~~830“Foreign~~principles ~~Currency~~generally ~~Translation”,~~accepted ~~foreign~~in ~~denominated~~the ~~monetary~~United ~~assets~~States and ~~liabilities~~ are ~~translated~~expressed ~~into~~in ~~United~~US ~~States~~ dollars. atThese ~~rates~~consolidated offinancial ~~exchange~~statements ininclude ~~effect~~the ataccounts of the ~~balance~~Company ~~sheet~~and ~~date. Non~~its wholly-~~monetary~~owned ~~items~~subsidiaries, ~~including~~MarilynJean ~~equity,~~Holdings ~~are translated at the historical rate of exchange~~Inc. ~~Revenues~~ and ~~expenses~~MarilynJean ~~are~~Media ~~translated at the average rates of exchange during the year~~Inc. ~~During~~All ~~the year ended July 31, 2012, the~~ inter-company ~~had~~accounts ~~immaterial~~and ~~translation~~transactions ~~loss~~have ~~due~~been ~~to cash translation which was deemed to be irrelevant~~eliminated.

~~F-8~~(b)

~~Future~~Use ~~Energy~~of ~~Corp.~~Estimates

~~(An~~The ~~Exploration~~preparation ~~Stage~~of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company) regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to impairment of oil and gas properties and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

~~Notes to the Financial Statements~~(c)

3.Cash and Cash Equivalents

~~Summary~~The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of ~~Significant~~three ~~Accounting~~months ~~Policies~~or ~~(continued)~~less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

h)F-7

~~Loss per Share~~2.

~~The~~Summary ~~Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 740 "Earnings per Share". ASC 260 requires presentation~~ of ~~both~~Significant ~~basic~~Accounting ~~and~~Principles ~~diluted earnings per share~~ (~~“EPS”~~continued) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended July 31, 2012 are the same as any incremental common stock equivalent would be anti-dilutive.

i(d)

~~Income~~Foreign ~~Taxes~~Currency Translation

The Company’s ~~accounts~~functional ~~for~~and ~~income~~reporting ~~taxes~~currency ~~using~~is the ~~asset~~US ~~and liability approach~~dollar. ~~Deferred~~ ~~tax~~Foreign ~~assets~~exchange ~~and~~items ~~liabilities~~ are ~~recognized~~translated ~~for~~to ~~the~~US ~~future~~dollars ~~tax~~in ~~consequences~~accordance ~~attributable~~with toASC ~~differences~~830, ~~between~~“Foreign ~~the~~Currency ~~financial~~Translation ~~statement~~Matters”, ~~carrying~~using ~~amounts~~the ofexchange ~~existing~~rate ~~assets~~prevailing ~~and~~at ~~liabilities~~the ~~and~~balance ~~their~~sheet ~~respective tax bases~~date. ~~Deferred~~Monetary ~~tax~~ assets and liabilities are ~~measured~~translated using ~~enacted~~the ~~tax~~exchange ~~rates~~rate ~~expected~~at ~~to apply to taxable income in~~ the ~~years~~balance insheet ~~which~~date. ~~those~~Non-monetary ~~temporary~~assets ~~differences~~and liabilities are ~~expected~~translated toat behistorical ~~recovered or settled~~rates. ~~The~~Revenues ~~effect on deferred tax assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~expenses ofare atranslated ~~change~~at inaverage ~~tax~~ rates isfor ~~recognized in income in~~ the period. ~~that~~Gains ~~includes~~and ~~the~~losses ~~enactment~~arising ~~date.~~on ~~Valuation~~translation ~~allowances~~or ~~are~~settlement ~~established,~~of ~~when~~foreign ~~necessary,~~currency todenominated ~~reduce~~transactions ~~deferred~~or ~~tax~~balances ~~assets~~are toincluded in the ~~mounts~~determination ~~expected~~of ~~to be realized~~income.

j)The subsidiaries’ accounts are translated to US dollars using the current rate method. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are translated into US dollars at the period-end exchange rate while revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. Related exchange gains and losses are included in a separate component of stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income.

~~Revenue Recognition~~(e)

~~The~~Financial Company uses the sales method to account for sales of crude oil and natural gas. Under this method, revenues are recognized based on actual volumes of oil and gas sold to purchasers. The volumes sold may differ from the volumes to which the Company is entitled based on the interest in the properties. These differences create imbalances which are recognized as a liability only when the imbalance exceeds the estimate of remaining reserves. We had no production, limited revenue and no imbalances as of July 31, 2011. Costs associated with production are expensed in the period incurred.Instruments

k)Pursuant to ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

~~Recent~~Level ~~Accounting Pronouncements~~1

WeLevel do1 ~~not~~applies ~~expect~~to ~~the~~assets ~~adoption~~or ofliabilities ~~recently~~for ~~issued~~which ~~accounting~~there ~~pronouncements~~are toquoted ~~have~~prices ain ~~significant~~active ~~impact~~markets onfor ~~our~~identical ~~results~~assets ~~of operations, financial position~~ or ~~cash flow~~liabilities.

4.Level 2

~~Oil~~Level ~~Well~~2 ~~Properties~~applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

OnLevel July 25, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party (Tim Cooksey Oil, LLC) to purchase a 1.57% working interest in unproved property located in Franklin County, Illinois for $25,000.3

OnLevel ~~December~~3 ~~17,~~applies ~~2010,~~to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the ~~Company~~valuation ~~purchased~~methodology athat 3%are ~~working~~significant ~~interest~~to inthe ~~unproved~~measurement ~~property~~of ~~located~~the infair ~~Franklin~~value ~~County,~~of ~~Illinois~~the ~~for~~assets ~~$25,000~~or liabilities.

~~F-9~~The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, amounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, loans payable, and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

~~Future Energy Corp.~~(f)

~~(An~~Oil ~~Exploration~~and ~~Stage~~Gas ~~Company)~~Properties

~~Notes~~The Company applies the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Under the successful efforts method, exploration costs such as exploratory geological and geophysical costs, delay rentals and exploration overhead are charged against earnings as incurred. Acquisition costs and costs of drilling exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether proved reserves can be attributed to the ~~Financial~~area ~~Statements~~as a result of drilling the well. If management determines that commercial quantities of hydrocarbons have not been discovered, capitalized costs associated with exploratory wells are charged to exploration expense. Acquisition costs of unproved leaseholds are assessed for impairment during the holding period and transferred to proved oil and gas properties to the extent associated with successful exploration activities. Significant undeveloped leases are assessed individually for impairment, based on the Company’s current exploration plans, and a valuation allowance is provided if impairment is indicated.

5.F-8

~~Promissory~~MARILYNJEAN ~~Note~~INTERACTIVE ~~– Related Party~~INC.

OnNotes ~~December~~to ~~8, 2010,~~ the ~~Company~~consolidated ~~entered~~financial into an unsecured promissory note with the President of the Company whereby the Company borrowed $25,000. The note is interest bearing at 2% per annum commencing December 8, 2010, and repayable on December 8, 2012.statements

OnDecember ~~May 16~~31, 2011, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with the President of the Company whereby the Company borrowed $5,000. The note is interest bearing at the rate of Royal Bank of Canada prime Interest rate plus 2% per annum commencing May 16, 2011, and repayable on May 16, 20122014

On(Expressed ~~July~~in ~~13,~~US 2011, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with the President of the Company whereby the Company borrowed $10,000. The note is interest bearing at the rate of Royal Bank of Canada prime Interest rate plus 2% per annum commencing July 13, 2011, and repayable on July 13, 2012dollars)

On December 14, 2011, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with the President of the Company whereby the Company borrowed $10,000. The note is interest bearing at the rate of Royal Bank of Canada prime interest rate plus 2~~% per annum commencing December 14, 2011, and repayable on December 14, 2012~~.

OnSummary ~~April 23, 2012, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with the President~~ of ~~the~~Significant ~~Company~~Accounting ~~whereby~~Principles ~~the Company borrowed $5,000. The note is interest bearing at the rate of Royal Bank of Canada prime interest rate plus 2% per annum commencing April 23, 2012, and repayable on April 23, 2013.~~ (continued)

On July 8, 2012, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with the President of the Company whereby the Company borrowed $9,500. The note is interest bearing at the rate of Royal Bank of Canada prime interest rate plus 2% per annum commencing July 8, 2012, and repayable on July 8, 2013. (f)

6.Oil and Gas Properties (continued)

~~Other~~Depreciation, ~~Related~~depletion ~~Party~~and ~~Transactions~~amortization of the cost of proved oil and gas properties are calculated using the unit-of-production method. The reserve base used to calculate depreciation, depletion and amortization is the sum of proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves for leasehold acquisition costs and the cost to acquire proved properties. With respect to lease and well equipment costs, which include development costs and successful exploration drilling costs, the reserve base includes only proved developed reserves. Estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, are taken into account. Our current properties have minimal production and are considered unproved as of December 31, 2014 and as such are not subject to depletion until such time they are further developed and determined to be proved or impaired.

aAmortization rates are updated to reflect: 1) the addition of capital costs, 2) reserve revisions (upwards or downwards) and additions, 3) property acquisitions and/or property dispositions and 4) impairments.

AsThe atCompany ~~July~~reviews 31its proved properties in accordance with ASC 932-360, ~~2012~~Extractive Activities Oil & Gas, Property, Plant, and Equipment (“ASC 360”). ASC 360 requires the Company ~~was~~to ~~indebted~~evaluate toproperty and equipment as an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the ~~President~~fair value of the ~~Company~~property inand equipment below the carrying amount. If the carrying amount of ~~$516,~~property ~~which~~and equipment is ~~non~~not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, then the Company would recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the discounted cash flow. Unproved properties are also evaluated under ASC 932-~~interest~~360 ~~bearing~~periodically by management to determine whether they have been impaired. A property would likely be impaired, ~~unsecured~~for example, if a dry hole has been drilled on it and ~~due~~the entity has no firm plans to continue drilling. Also, the likelihood of partial or total impairment of a property increases as the expiration of the lease term approaches if drilling activity has not commenced on ~~demand~~the property or on nearby properties. If the results of the assessment indicate impairment, a loss shall be recognized by providing a valuation allowance.

b(g)

~~Our~~Asset ~~principal~~Retirement ~~executive office space is provided by the President at no cost to the Company.~~Obligations

7The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations in accordance with the provisions of ASC 440, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” which requires the Company to record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the assets.

~~Income Taxes~~(h)

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes wherein deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting purposes at rates expected to be in effect when the differences are realized. During fiscal 2012, the Company incurred net losses and therefore has no current tax liability. The net deferred tax asset generated by the Company’s net operating loss carryLong-~~forwards~~lived has been fully reserved. The cumulative net operating loss carry-forward is approximately $100,042 as at July 31, 2012. Under current tax laws, the net operating loss is set to expire on July 31, 2032.Assets

AtIn ~~July31~~accordance with ASC 360-10, ~~2012~~Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and ~~July~~used 31is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, ~~2012~~an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount of the fair value less costs to sell, ~~deferred~~and ~~tax~~are no longer depreciated. The assets ~~consisted~~and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the ~~following:~~appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

	2012	2011
Deferred tax assets	34,014	15,535
Less: valuation allowance	(34,014)	(15,535)
Net deferred tax assets	-	-

F-9

~~F-10~~MARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.

~~Future~~Notes ~~Energy~~to ~~Corp.~~the consolidated financial statements

~~(An~~December ~~Exploration~~31, ~~Stage Company)~~2014

~~Notes~~(Expressed toin ~~the~~US ~~Financial Statements~~dollars)

82.

~~Common~~Summary ~~Stock~~of ~~and~~Significant ~~warrants~~Accounting Principles (continued)

~~On June 4, 2012, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada a Certificate of Change to its Articles of Incorporation~~ (~~the “Certificate of Change”). As a result of the Certificate of Change, the Company has: (~~i) increased the authorized number of shares of common stock to five hundred million (500,000,000), with a par value of $0.001 per share and increased the authorized number of shares of preferred stock to two hundred million (200,000,000), with a par value of $0.001 per share, and (ii ) effectuated a 12-for-1 forward split (the “Forward Split”) of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company for all shareholders of record on the close of business on May 25, 2012. We have accounted for the stock split retroactively and have updated the outstanding common shares on the balance sheet.

OnIncome July 11, 2012, the company issued 42,385,500 units at $0.01 per share for total proceeds of $423,855. Each unit consists of one common share and one fourth of one common shares warrant exercisable at $0.50 and one half of a common share warrant with an exercise price of $1.00. Of the total proceeds, the company received $5,000 subsequent to year-end. The company has shown subscription receivable as current asset on balance sheet.Taxes

~~Warrants~~The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. The asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.

~~The~~As ~~Company~~of ~~issued~~December 31,~~789,125~~ ~~warrants~~2014 inand ~~conjunction~~2013, ~~with~~ the ~~issuance~~Company ofdid ~~shares.~~not ~~The~~have ~~warrants~~any ~~had~~amounts anrecorded ~~aggregate~~pertaining ~~intrinsic~~to ~~value~~uncertain oftax ~~$0 at July 31, 2012~~positions.

The ~~following~~Company isfiles federal and provincial income tax returns in Canada and federal, state, and local taxes in the ~~summary~~US, as applicable. The Company may be subject to a reassessment of ~~warrant~~federal ~~transactions~~and provincial income taxes by Canadian tax authorities for a period of three years from the date of the original notice of assessment in respect of any particular taxation year. ~~ended~~In ~~July~~certain 31circumstances, ~~2012:~~the US federal statute of limitations can reach beyond the standard three year period. US state statutes of limitations for income tax assessments vary from state to state. Tax authorities of Canada and US have not audited any of the Company’s, or its subsidiaries’, income tax returns for the open taxation years.

	Number	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at July 31, 2011	-	-
Issued	31,789,125	$0.83
Exercised	-	-
Expired	-	-
Outstanding at July 31, 2012	31,789,125	$0.83

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no charges for interest or penalties.

~~The warrants that are issued, outstanding, and exercisable as of July 31, 2012 are as follows:~~(j)

Number of Warrants	Exercise Price	Expiration Date
10,596,375	$ 0.50	July 31,2014
21,192,750	$1.00	July 31,2014

Revenue Recognition

9The Company earns revenue from the sale of children’s products. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition”. Revenue is recognized when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the goods have been shipped, and collectability is reasonably assured.

~~Subsequent Event~~(k)

OnStock-based August 17, 2012, the company issued a note receivable for a total of $50,000 to third party, payable after one year from the issuance date. The note accrues interest at prime rate of Canada plus 2% interest rate.Compensation

OnThe ~~October~~Company 1,records ~~2012,~~stock-based ~~the~~compensation ~~company~~in ~~issued~~accordance awith ~~note~~ASC ~~receivable~~718, ~~for~~“Compensation a– ~~total~~Stock ofBased ~~$50,000~~Compensation” toand ~~third~~ASC ~~party~~505, ~~payable~~“Equity ~~after~~Based ~~one~~Payments ~~year~~to ~~from~~Non-Employees”, which requires the ~~issuance~~measurement ~~date.~~and ~~The~~recognition ~~note~~of ~~accrues~~compensation ~~interest~~expense atbased ~~prime~~on ~~rate~~estimated offair ~~Canada~~values ~~plus~~for 2%all ~~interest~~share-based ~~rate~~awards made to employees and directors, including stock options.

FASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-11based awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model as its method of determining fair value. This model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These subjective variables include, but are not limited to the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviours. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense in the statement of operations over the requisite service period.

~~ITEM~~All 9transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

~~CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.~~F-10

~~None~~MARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.

~~ITEM~~Notes ~~9A.~~to the consolidated financial statements

~~CONTROLS~~December ~~AND~~31, ~~PROCEDURES.~~ 2014

~~Disclosure~~(Expressed ~~Controls~~in ~~and~~US ~~Procedures~~dollars)

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure2.

WeSummary ~~carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation~~ of ~~our~~Significant ~~management,~~Accounting ~~including~~Principles our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 31, 2012. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.(continued)

~~Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting~~ (l)

~~Management~~Loss isPer ~~responsible~~Share for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~Because~~The ofCompany ~~its~~computes ~~inherent~~net ~~limitations,~~loss ~~internal~~per ~~control~~share ~~over~~in ~~financial~~accordance ~~reporting~~with ~~may~~ASC ~~not~~260, ~~prevent~~“Earnings orper ~~detect misstatements~~Share”. ~~Also,~~ ~~projections~~ASC 260 requires presentation of ~~any~~both ~~evaluation~~basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of ~~effectiveness~~the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to ~~future~~common ~~periods~~shareholders ~~are~~(numerator) ~~subject~~by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the ~~risk~~period ~~that~~using ~~controls~~the ~~may~~treasury ~~become~~stock ~~inadequate~~method ~~because~~and ofconvertible ~~changes~~preferred instock ~~conditions~~using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, orthe ~~that~~average stock price for the ~~degree~~period is used in determining the number of ~~compliance~~shares ~~with~~assumed to be purchased from the ~~policies~~exercise of stock options or ~~procedures~~warrants. ~~may~~Diluted ~~deteriorate~~EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As at December 31, 2014, the Company had 106,651,250 (2013 – 138,440,375) potential dilutive shares outstanding.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2012, using the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (~~"COSO"~~m).

AComprehensive material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2012, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.Loss

1.ASC ~~We do not have an Audit Committee – While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee~~220, it“Comprehensive ~~is the management’s view that such a committee~~Income”, ~~including~~establishes astandards ~~financial~~for ~~expert member, is an utmost important entity level control over~~ the Company’s financial statement. Currently the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of the Audit Committee. 2. We did not maintain appropriate cash controls – As of July 31, 2012, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting ~~for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling~~ and ~~accounting~~display ~~functions, and did not require dual signature on the Company’s bank accounts. Alternatively, the effects~~ of ~~poor~~comprehensive ~~cash~~loss ~~controls~~and ~~were~~its ~~mitigated~~components ~~by the fact that the Company had limited transactions~~ in their bank accounts. 3. Lack of segregation of duties. We have an inadequate number of personnel to properly implement control procedures. 4. Lack of a formal review process that includes multiple levels of review from adequate personnel with requisite expertise. We do not have a functioning audit committee of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the ~~establishment~~financial ~~and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures~~statements. 5.The ~~We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at July 31, 2012, the~~ Company ~~retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company~~’s ~~data~~only orcomponent ~~off-site storage~~ of ~~the~~comprehensive ~~data~~loss inis ~~the~~unrealized ~~event~~gains ofand ~~theft,~~losses ~~misplacement,~~on orforeign ~~loss~~exchange ~~due to unmitigated factors~~translation.

13(n)

~~Accordingly,~~Recent ~~the~~Accounting Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls.Pronouncements

AsThe aCompany ~~result~~has oflimited operations and is considered to be in the ~~material~~development ~~weaknesses~~stage. ~~described~~In ~~above,~~the ~~management~~year ~~has~~ended ~~concluded~~December ~~that~~31, 2014, the Company ~~did~~elected ~~not~~to ~~maintain~~early ~~effective~~adopt ~~internal~~Accounting ~~control~~Standards ~~over~~Update ~~financial~~No. ~~reporting~~2014-10, as“Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of ~~July~~Certain ~~31,~~Financial ~~2012,~~Reporting ~~based~~Requirements”. onThe ~~criteria~~adoption ~~established~~of inthis ~~Internal~~ASU ~~Control—Integrated~~allows ~~Framework~~the ~~issued~~Company byto ~~COSO~~remove the inception to date information and all references to development stage.

~~Changes~~The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in ~~Internal~~effect. ~~Control~~These ~~over~~pronouncements ~~Financial~~did ~~Reporting~~not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation we conducted of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2012, that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting3.

~~This~~Acquisition ~~annual report does not include an attestation report~~ of ~~the~~MarilynJean ~~Company’s~~Media ~~registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting~~Inc. ~~Managements~~ ~~report~~and was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.Recapitalization

~~Continuing~~On ~~Remediation~~March ~~Efforts~~25, to2013, ~~address~~the ~~deficiencies~~“Company entered into a share exchange agreement with MJM. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company, together with its wholly-owned subsidiary, MarilynJean Holdings Inc., acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of MJM in exchange for 75,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company’s ~~Internal~~and ~~Control~~106,651,250 ~~over~~exchangeable ~~Financial~~preferred ~~Reporting~~stock of MarilynJean Holdings Inc. The exchangeable shares of preferred stock are redeemable by the holders into shares of common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis. The share exchange agreement closed on March 28, 2013.

~~Once~~After the ~~Company~~close isof ~~engaged~~the inshare aexchange ~~business~~agreement, the Company has 194,528,352 shares of ~~merit~~common ~~and~~stock ~~has~~issued ~~sufficient~~and ~~personnel~~outstanding ~~available~~and 106,651,250 ~~then~~shares ~~our~~of ~~Board~~common stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of ~~Directors~~106,651,250 exchangeable shares of preferred stock outstanding. The acquisition was a capital transaction in ~~particular~~substance and intherefore ~~connection~~has ~~with~~been accounted for as a recapitalization, which is outside the ~~aforementioned~~scope ~~deficiencies~~ASC 805, ~~will~~“Business ~~establish~~Combinations”. Under recapitalization accounting, MJM is considered the ~~following~~acquirer ~~remediation~~for ~~measures:~~accounting and financial reporting purposes, and acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities of the Company. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are reported at their historical amounts. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company since the effective date of the recapitalization and the historical accounts of the business of MJM since its inception on September 1, 2011.

	1.	Our Board of Directors will nominate an audit committee or a financial expert on our Board of Directors in the next fiscal year.
	2.	We will appoint additional personnel to assist with the preparation of the Company’s monthly financial reporting, including preparation of the monthly bank reconciliations.

F-11

~~ITEM~~MARILYNJEAN 9BINTERACTIVE INC.

~~OTHER~~Notes ~~INFORMATION~~to the consolidated financial statements

OnDecember ~~July 8~~31, 2012, the Company issued a one-year Promissory Note, in the principal amount of $9,500 to Georges Paquet, the President of the Company to evidence funds previously loaned by Mr. Paquet to the Company. The $9,500 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is due and payable on or before July 8, 2013 and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Rate plus 2% per annum.2014

~~On August 17, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement~~ (~~the~~Expressed ~~“August Loan”) with Marilyn Jean Media Inc. (“MJM”), whereby the Company lent MJM funds~~ in ~~the~~US principal amount of $50,000. The $50,000 principal amount underlying the August Loan is due and payable on or before August 17, 2013 and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Rate plus 2% per annum.dollars)

~~On October 1, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “October Loan”) with MJM, whereby the Company lent MJM funds in the principal amount of $50,000~~3. ~~The $50,000 principal amount underlying the October Loan is due and payable on or before October 1, 2013 and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Rate plus 2% per annum.~~

14Acquisition of MarilynJean Media Inc. and Recapitalization (continued)

~~PART~~The ~~III~~assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows:

ITEM 10.


	$

Cash	267,058
Amounts receivable	1,979
Loan receivable	100,000
Oil and gas properties	50,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(18,132)
Due to related parties	(65,016)

Net assets acquired	335,889

~~DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~ 4.

~~Identification~~Restricted ~~of Directors and Executive Officers~~Cash

~~The~~Restricted ~~following~~cash ~~table~~represented ~~sets~~cash ~~forth~~pledged ~~the~~as ~~names~~security ~~and~~for ~~ages~~the ofCompany’s ~~our~~credit ~~current directors and executive officers:~~cards.

Name	Age	Position with the Company	Date of Appointment
Georges Paquet	62	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director	April 6, 2010
Melany Paquet	37	Vice President and Director	April 6, 2010
Mike Anderson	42	Director	September 10, 2010
Jefferson K. Villines	35	Director	December 5, 2010
Chester Ku	38	Director	June 1, 2012

~~The~~Oil ~~board~~and ofGas ~~directors has no nominating, audit or compensation committee at this time.~~Properties

~~Term of Office~~(a)

~~Each~~On ofJuly ~~our~~25, ~~officers~~2010, ~~is elected by~~ the Company’s ~~Board~~purchased ofa ~~Directors and their terms of office are at the discretion of the Board~~1.57% ~~Our~~working ~~officers~~interest ~~serve~~in ~~until~~an ~~the~~unproved ~~earlier~~property ~~occurrence~~located ofin ~~the~~Franklin ~~election~~County, ofIllinois ~~his~~for or$25,000. ~~her~~During ~~successor at~~ the ~~next~~year ~~meeting~~ended ofDecember ~~stockholders~~31, ~~death~~2014, ~~resignation~~the orCompany ~~removal~~recorded byan ~~the~~impairment ~~Board~~ of ~~Directors. All~~$25,000 ofdue ~~our~~to ~~directors hold office until~~ the ~~next~~uncertainty ~~annual~~of ~~general~~recovery ~~meeting~~ of ~~the~~its ~~shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified~~cost.

~~Background and Business Experience~~(b)

~~The~~On ~~following~~December is17, a2010, ~~brief account of~~ the ~~education~~Company ~~and~~purchased ~~business~~a ~~experience~~3% ofworking ~~our~~interest ~~directors~~in ~~and~~an ~~executive~~unproved ~~officers~~property ~~during~~located atin ~~least~~Franklin ~~the~~County, ~~past~~Illinois ~~five~~for ~~years~~$25,000. ~~indicating~~During ~~their~~the ~~principal~~year ~~occupations~~ended ~~and~~December ~~employment~~31, ~~during the period~~2014, ~~and~~ the ~~name~~Company ~~and~~recorded ~~principal~~an ~~business~~impairment of ~~the~~$25,000 ~~organization~~due into ~~which~~the ~~such~~uncertainty ~~occupations~~of orrecovery ~~employment~~of ~~were~~its ~~carried on~~cost.

~~Georges Paquet, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director~~6.

~~Mr.~~Loans Paquet has a background in accounting. Mr. Paquet worked for Caisse Populaire St. Georges as both a teller and manager from 1966 to 1972. From 1984 to 1986, Mr. Paquet served as a project manager for Rock Lessard Inc, a building contractor working on behalf of a multimillion dollar Hydro Quebec construction project in the James Bay area of Quebec. From 1998 to 2004 Mr. Paquet served as an export, sales and public relations representative for Beauce Windows & Doors Inc., a manufacturing company focussed on windows and doors. In this capacity his primary function was expanding the company’s business into the United States as well as liaising with the Federal Government of Canada for related grants. Mr. Paquet has been retired since 2004 and thus currently provides services only to the Company. He currently spends approximately 25 hours per week providing services to the Company, which represents approximately 100% of his working hours. Mr. Paquet’s time commitment and devotion to the Company’s operations, coupled with his diverse business experiences has led the Company to the determination that he is a good fit as an executive officer and director of the Company. Payable

~~Melany Paquet, Vice President and Director~~(a)

~~Ms.~~As ~~Paquet~~at ~~attended~~December ~~LaSalle~~31, ~~College~~2014, ~~in St. Georges from 1989-1992. From 2003 until~~ the ~~present,~~Company ~~Ms. Paquet~~ has ~~operated~~ a ~~care~~loan ~~facility~~payable ~~out~~ of ~~her~~$22,211 ~~home.~~(Cdn$25,767) ~~Ms.~~(2013 ~~Paquet~~- ~~currently~~$24,226 ~~spends approximately 5 hours per week providing services to our company~~(Cdn$25,767)) which ~~represents~~bears ~~approximately~~interest ~~10%~~at ~~of her working hours. Ms. Paquet is~~ the ~~daughter~~Bank of ~~Mr.~~Canada ~~Paquet.~~prime ~~Ms.~~rate ~~Paquet’s~~plus ~~relationship~~2% asper ~~daughter~~annum, ofdue ~~the~~on ~~President~~April ~~of the Company~~17, ~~her efforts in acquiring our current working interests~~2014, and ~~her~~is ~~dedication~~secured toby ~~the Company led the Company to determine she would be~~ a ~~good~~general ~~fit~~security ~~as an officer and director of the Company~~agreement.

15(b)

~~Mike~~As ~~Anderson~~at December 31, ~~Director~~2014, the Company has a loan payable of $20,671 (Cdn$23,980) (2013 - $22,546 (Cdn$23,980)) which bears interest at Bank of Canada prime rate plus 2% per annum, is unsecured, and due on May 28, 2014.

Mr. Anderson obtained a double major in geology and physics from Dalhousie University in 1993. During his time at Dalhousie, Mr. Anderson interned with Amoco Petroleum Canada in the summer of 1991. In the summer of 1992, Mr. Anderson worked with the Geological Survey of Canada at the Bedford Institute of Oceanography. Both appointments provided Mr. Anderson with valuable training from experienced senior scientists. Following graduation, Mr. Anderson spent several years in both North and South America performing geophysical surveys ranging from 3-D seismic exploration in the Gulf of Mexico (~~1993-1995~~c) to airborne surveys over the jungles of Brazil (1995-2000). From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Anderson was employed by Tetra Tech, a provider of consulting, engineering, and technical services worldwide, as Lead Geophysicist on environmental remediation projects where his duties included field management, unexploded ordnance (UXO) detection and documentation of UXO investigation studies. Mr. Anderson was employed by Risk Reduction Resources Inc (RRR) from February 2006 to December 2010. RRR is a geophysical company specializing in ground-based geophysics. As Senior Geophysicist, his responsibilities included business development, data processing, analysis and interpretation of mineral and oil exploration airborne and ground geophysical data. In January 2011, Mr. Anderson joined Mine-EOD, an environmental remediation company. As Senior Geophysicist, his responsibilities there include business development, geophysical data processing and analysis and field management and airborne geophysical surveys for mineral exploration. The Company decided Mr. Anderson would be a good director because he has more than 15 years experience in the areas of gravity, magnetic, electromagnetic, and radiometric applications in mineral exploration, petroleum exploration, and UXO detection as shown by his various work experiences.

~~Jefferson~~As K.at ~~Villines~~December ~~III~~31, ~~Director~~2014, the Company has a loan payable of $8,620 (Cdn$10,000) (2013 - $9,402 (Cdn$10,000)) which bears interest at the Bank of Canada prime rate plus 2% per annum, is unsecured, and due on December 7, 2014.

Mr7. Villines has been the President and Owner of JKV Management Consulting, LLC, (“JKV Consulting”) a management consulting company which markets interests in oil and gas projects, since March of 2006. As President of JKV Consulting. Mr. Villines’ role consists of project evaluation, management of direct marketing and supervision of day-to-day operations. His responsibilities in this position include assessing all potential investments, visiting all properties in which the company invests, and negotiating with suppliers. He has also been the President of CJT.JKV Oil Development, LLC (“JKV Oil Development”), an asset holding company, which focuses on oil and gas interests, since its inception in February 2010. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Villines worked at ESPN in Dallas, as an account executive in the marketing and advertising dept. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Villines worked as VP of Sales and Marketing for Northstar Energy Inc. (“Northstar”), in Dallas, and from 2004 to 2005, he worked as VP of Sales and Marketing for Gulftex Operating, Inc. (“Gulftex”) in Dallas. Both Northstar and Gulftex are independent energy companies which operate and manage oil and gas leases, and in his positions as VP of Sales and Marketing for both companies, Mr. Villines assisted in project management, project evaluation, marketing, and sales of oil and gas leases. Mr. Villines studied Business Administration at Texas A&M University (1998-1999) and Oklahoma State University (1996-1997). In addition, Mr. Villines has over five years managing the promotion of developmental and exploratory oil and gas projects to private and institutional bodies, as well as providing private consultancy services to a number of independent oil and gas companies, specifically, in the field of direct marketing of working interest programs. Although his family has been involved in the oil and gas industry for over 75 years, each generation has taken a different path into the industry; thus, Mr. Villines’ hands on expertise is invaluable in being able to ascertain and evaluate the best possible opportunities to proactively move the company forward. Mr. Villines’ extensive experience with oil and gas companies and his ability to manage projects led the Company to the determination that he would be invaluable as a director of the Company.

~~Chester~~Related ~~Ku,~~Party ~~Director~~Transactions

~~Over the past fifteen years, Mr. Ku has gained significant experience in several different industries and has held various positions as~~ (a software developer, manager, business owner and consultant. From May 1995 to September 1996, Mr. Ku headed the technical support team at ADP Systems Informatiques and was responsible for software development of custom accounting and payroll software. In April 1997, Mr. Ku joined CIBC VISA as a customer service representative working with the “help desk”, providing second-level support and resolving escalated calls. In June of 1999, he completed the Canadian Securities Course and joined CIBC Wealth Management working as a Registered Representative. As a Registered Representative, his primary role was providing order execution for online brokerage clients. He also obtained his Derivatives Fundamentals, Options Licensing, Professional Financial Planning and Technical Analysis certificates during that time. Mr. Ku left CIBC in 2002 and in 2004, formed Astronutrition, a company that sells vitamins and supplements online at www.astronutrition.com. During that time, Mr. Ku managed all aspects of the business including overseeing technical development, marketing, sales and product selection. In 2012, Mr. Ku sold Astronutrition and now works as an independent consultant to start-up businesses. The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Ku as a Director of the Company on account of his diverse business experiences.)

16As at December 31, 2014, the Company was indebted to a significant shareholder of the Company in the amount of $65,016 (2013 - $65,016), which is non-interest bearing, unsecured, and due on demand.

~~Identification of Significant Employees~~(b)

WeDuring ~~have~~the noyear ~~significant~~ended ~~employees~~December ~~other than Georges Paquet~~31, ~~our President~~2014, ~~Chief~~the ~~Executive~~Company ~~Officer,~~incurred ~~Chief~~management ~~Financial~~fees ~~Officer,~~of ~~Principal Accounting Officer~~$2,445 ~~Secretary,~~(2013 ~~Treasurer~~- ~~and Director~~$27,674) ~~and~~to ~~Melany~~the ~~Paquet~~former ~~our~~Chief ~~Vice~~Executive ~~President~~Officer ~~and Director. We believe that until such time that we have fully developed our plan~~ of ~~operations we will not have any employees and that we will frequently use consultants to assist in~~ the ~~completion of various projects~~Company.

~~Family Relationships~~(c)

WeDuring ~~currently~~the doyear ~~not~~ended ~~have~~December ~~any~~31, ~~officers~~2014, orthe ~~directors~~Company ofincurred ~~our~~management ~~company~~fees ~~who~~of ~~are~~$nil ~~related~~(2013 - $26,702) to ~~each~~the ~~other.~~former Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

~~Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings~~F-12

~~During~~MARILYNJEAN ~~the~~INTERACTIVE ~~past ten years no director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Company has been involved in the following:~~INC.

~~(1)~~Notes to the consolidated financial statements

ADecember ~~petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law which was filed by or against~~31, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;2014

(2Expressed in US dollars)

~~Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);~~8.

i.Common Stock

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:(a)

iiOn March 1, 2013, the MJM issued 106,652,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share for proceeds of $1,038 which had not yet been received as at December 31, 2014.

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;(b)

~~iii.~~On March 22, 2013, the MJM effected a stock split for its issued and outstanding common shares, on the following basis:

~~Engaging in any type of business practice; or~~·

~~iv.~~6,750 Class A common shares for 1 Class A common share

~~Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;~~·

~~(3)~~100,000 Class B common shares for 1 Class B common share

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;·

~~(4)~~6,750 Class C common shares for 1 Class C common share

~~Such~~All ~~person~~MJM ~~was~~share ~~found~~amounts ~~by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to~~ have ~~violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not~~ been ~~subsequently~~retroactively ~~reversed,~~restated ~~suspended,~~for orall ~~vacated;~~periods presented.

(5c)

~~Such~~On ~~person~~March ~~was~~28, ~~found~~2013, bythe aCompany ~~court~~issued of75,000,000 ~~competent~~shares ~~jurisdiction~~of incommon astock ~~civil~~and ~~action~~its orwholly-owned bysubsidiary, ~~the~~Marilyn ~~Commodity~~Jean ~~Futures~~Holdings ~~Trading~~Inc., ~~Commission~~issued to106,651,250 ~~have~~exchangeable ~~violated~~shares ~~any~~of ~~Federal~~preferred ~~commodities~~stock ~~law,~~to ~~and~~ the ~~judgment~~shareholders inof ~~such~~MJM ~~civil~~to ~~action~~acquire or100% ~~finding~~of by the ~~Commodity~~issued ~~Futures~~and ~~Trading~~outstanding ~~Commission~~shares ~~has~~of ~~not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;~~MJM.

179.

~~(6)~~Share Purchase Warrants

~~Such~~The ~~person~~following ~~was~~table summarizes the ~~subject~~continuity of, orshare apurchase ~~party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of~~warrants:


	Number of warrants	Weighted average exercise price $

Balance, December 31, 2012	–	–

Outstanding warrants of the Company prior to reverse merger	31,789,125	0.83

Balance, December 31, 2013	31,789,125	0.83

Expired	(31,789,125)	0.83

Balance, December 31, 2014	–	–

~~Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or~~F-13

iiMARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.

~~Any~~Notes ~~law~~to orthe ~~regulation~~consolidated ~~respecting~~ financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; orstatements

~~iii.~~December 31, 2014

~~Any~~(Expressed ~~law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud~~ in ~~connection~~US ~~with any business entity; or~~dollars)

~~(7)~~10.

~~Such~~Income person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. Taxes

~~Code~~The Company has $765,497 of ~~Ethics~~net operating losses carried forward to offset taxable income in future years which expire commencing in fiscal 2031. The income tax benefit differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate to net loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 as a result of the following:

Our board of directors has not adopted a code of ethics due to the fact that we presently are in the exploration stage of our operations and we do not have any employees who are not also officers of the Company. We anticipate that we will adopt a code of ethics when we increase the number of our employees.


	2014 $	2013 $

Net loss before taxes	(138,001)	(290,041)
Statutory rate	34%	34%

Expected tax recovery	(46,921)	(98,614)

Permanent differences and other	77	(7,624)
Change in tax rates	–	(2,062)
Tax rate difference for foreign jurisdiction	2,738	18,559
Losses of legal parent upon merger	–	(39,126)
Change in valuation allowance	44,106	128,867

Income tax provision	–	–

~~Audit~~The ~~Committee~~significant components of deferred income tax assets and ~~Audit~~liabilities ~~Committee~~as ~~Financial~~at ~~Expert~~December 31, 2014 and 2013 after applying enacted corporate income tax rates are as follows:

The Company does not have an audit committee or an audit committee financial expert (as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) serving on its Board of Directors. All current members of the Board of Directors lack sufficient financial expertise for overseeing financial reporting responsibilities. The Company has not yet employed an audit committee financial expert on its Board due to the inability to attract such a person.


	2014 $	2013 $

Net operating losses carried forward	224,527	180,421
Valuation allowance	(224,527)	(180,421)

Net deferred income tax asset	–	–

~~The~~As ~~Company~~at ~~intends~~December to31, ~~establish an audit committee of the board of directors~~2014, ~~which will consist of independent directors. The audit committee’s duties will be to recommend to~~ the Company’s ~~board~~is ofin ~~directors~~arrears ~~the~~on ~~engagement~~filing ofits anstatutory ~~independent~~corporate ~~registered~~income ~~public~~tax ~~accounting~~returns ~~firm to audit the Company’s financial statements~~ and ~~to review~~ the ~~Company’s~~amounts ~~accounting~~presented ~~and~~above ~~auditing~~are ~~principles. The~~based ~~audit~~on committee will review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controlsestimates. The ~~audit~~actual ~~committee~~losses ~~will~~available atcould ~~all~~differ ~~times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, free~~ from ~~any~~these ~~relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles~~estimates.

~~Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act~~F-14

WeITEM ~~do not yet have a class of equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended~~9. ~~Hence,~~CHANGES ~~compliance~~IN ~~with~~AND ~~Section~~DISAGREEMENTS ~~16(a)~~WITH ~~thereof~~ACCOUNTANTS byON ~~our~~ACCOUNTING ~~officers~~AND ~~and~~FINANCIAL ~~directors is not required~~DISCLOSURE.

18None.

ITEM 119A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

~~EXECUTIVE~~Disclosure ~~COMPENSATION~~controls and procedures

~~Summary~~We ~~Compensation~~maintain ~~Table~~“disclosure controls and procedures”, as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e), promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~The~~As ~~following~~required ~~table~~by ~~sets~~paragraph ~~forth~~(b) of Rules 13a-15 under the ~~compensation~~Securities ~~paid~~Exchange toAct of 1934, our management, with the participation of our principal executive ~~officers~~officer ~~during~~and principal financial officer, evaluated our company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the ~~twelve~~end ~~month~~of ~~periods~~the ~~ended~~period ~~July~~covered 31by this annual report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, ~~2012~~and in light of the weaknesses identified below, the principal executive officer and ~~2011:~~ principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

~~Summary~~Management’s ~~Compensation~~annual ~~Table~~report on internal control over financial reporting

Name And Principal Position	Fiscal Year Ended 12/31	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Georges Paquet	2012	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2011	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Melany Paquet	2012	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2011	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

Under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, our Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 using the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1“COSO”).

~~Georges~~A ~~Paquet~~material ~~was~~weakness ~~appointed~~is asa ~~our~~deficiency ~~president,~~or ~~chief~~a ~~executive~~combination ~~officer,~~of ~~chief~~control deficiencies in internal control over financial ~~officer,~~reporting ~~secretary,~~such ~~treasurer~~that ~~and~~there ~~one~~is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our ~~directors~~annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on ~~April~~a 6timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2010~~2014, the Company determined that there were significant deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

~~(2)~~ 1.

~~Melany~~We ~~Paquet~~did ~~was~~not ~~appointed~~maintain asappropriate ~~our~~cash ~~vice-president~~controls – The Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and ~~director~~accounting functions, and did not require dual signature on ~~April~~the 6,Company’s ~~2010~~bank accounts.

~~Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table~~2.

~~There~~Lack ~~are~~of nosegregation ~~employment contracts, compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from the Company with respect to any executive officer, that would result in payments to such person because~~ of ~~his~~duties. orWe ~~her~~have ~~resignation,~~an ~~retirement~~inadequate ornumber ~~other termination~~ of ~~employment~~personnel ~~with~~to ~~the~~properly ~~Company,~~implement ~~or its subsidiaries, any change in~~ control, ~~or a change in the person’s responsibilities following a change in control of the Company~~procedures.

~~Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End~~ 3.

NoLack ~~named~~of ~~executive~~a ~~officer~~formal orreview ~~director~~process ~~received~~that ~~any~~includes ~~equity~~multiple ~~awards,~~levels orof ~~holds~~review ~~exercisable~~from oradequate ~~unexercisable~~personnel ~~options,~~with asrequisite expertise. We do not have a functioning audit committee of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the ~~years~~establishment ~~ended~~and ~~July~~monitoring ~~31,~~of ~~2012~~required internal controls and ~~2011~~procedures.

~~Compensation of Directors~~4.

~~Our~~We ~~directors~~did ~~receive~~not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at December 31, 2014, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no ~~extra~~formal ~~compensation~~procedure ~~for~~or ~~their~~evidence ~~service~~of onnormal ~~our~~backup ~~board~~of the Company’s data or off-site storage of ~~directors~~the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.

~~Long-Term Incentive Plans~~ 5.

~~There~~ Lack ~~are~~of noa ~~arrangements~~functioning oraudit ~~plans~~committee inand ~~which~~outside wedirectors ~~provide~~– ~~pension,~~We ~~retirement~~only orhave ~~similar~~one ~~benefits~~person ~~for~~acting ~~directors~~as orthe ~~executive~~sole ~~officers~~officer and director of the Company.

~~Compensation~~In ~~Committee~~light of the existence of these control deficiencies, management concluded that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls. As a result, management has concluded that our company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 based on criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

~~We currently do not have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors as a whole determines executive compensation.~~14

19Saturna Group Chartered Accountants LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, was not required to and has not issued a report concerning the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.

~~ITEM~~Limitations ~~12.~~on Effectiveness of Controls

~~SECURITY~~Our ~~OWNERSHIP~~principal OFexecutive ~~CERTAIN~~officer ~~BENEFICIAL~~and ~~OWNERS~~principal ~~AND~~financial ~~MANAGEMENT~~officer ~~AND~~do ~~RELATED~~not ~~STOCKHOLDER~~expect ~~MATTERS~~that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additional controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

~~Security~~Changes ~~Ownership~~in ofinternal ~~Certain~~control ~~Beneficial~~over ~~Owners~~financial reporting

~~The~~Except ~~following~~as ~~table~~disclosed ~~sets~~above, ~~forth~~there ~~the~~were ~~amount~~no ~~certain~~changes ~~information~~in ~~concerning the number of shares of~~ our ~~common~~internal ~~stock~~control ~~owned beneficially~~ as of ~~October~~December 2431, ~~2012~~2014, ~~by:~~that ~~(i)~~have ~~each~~materially ofaffected, ~~our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) each person~~ or ~~group~~are ~~known~~reasonably bylikely us to ~~beneficially~~materially ~~own~~affect ~~more than 5% of~~ our ~~outstanding~~internal ~~shares~~control ofover ~~common~~financial ~~stock~~reporting. ~~Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares they own.~~

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title of Class	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		Percentage of Class(1)
Georges Paquet 840 – 23rd Street, St. Georges de Beauce, Quebec, Canada G5Y 4N6	Common Stock	60,000,000	Direct	50.2%
Melany Paquet 1784 – 87th Street, St. Georges de Beauce, Quebec, Canada G6A 1L8	Common Stock	17,142,852	Direct	14.34%
Mike Anderson 840 – 23rd Street, St. Georges de Beauce, Quebec, Canada G5Y 4N6	Common Stock	-	-	-
Jefferson K. Villines III 840 – 23rd Street, St. Georges de Beauce, Quebec, Canada G5Y 4N6	Common Stock	-	-	-
Chester Ku 840 – 23rd Street, St. Georges de Beauce, Quebec, Canada G5Y 4N6	Common Stock	-	-	-
Directors and Executive Officers (5 – as a group)	Common Stock	77,142,852		64.54%
5% Stockholders
Georges Paquet 840 – 23rd Street, St. Georges de Beauce, Quebec, Canada G5Y 4N6	Common Stock	60,000,000	Direct		50.2%
Melany Paquet 1784 – 87th Street, St. Georges de Beauce, Quebec, Canada G6A 1L8	Common Stock	17,142,852	Direct		14.34%

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

~~(1)~~On April 11, 2014 Jason Carvalho resigned as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director. Also on April 11, 2014, Peter Janosi was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and sole director. There was no disagreement between MarilynJean and Mr. Carvalho on any matter relating to MarilynJean’s operations, policies or practices.

~~Based~~Mr. onJanosi ~~119~~received his Bachelor of Economics from the Zrinyi Miklós University in Budapest,~~528~~ Hungary and from 2006 to 2013 served as a police officer with the Budapest Police Services.~~352~~ ~~shares~~Since of2010, ~~our~~concurrent ~~common~~with ~~stock~~his ~~outstanding~~employment as ofa ~~October~~police 24officer, ~~2012~~Mr. Janosi has been mining and investing in Bitcoins and managing an online retail operation through E-bay. In 2013, Mr. Janosi left the police department to pursue this business full time. Mr. Janosi’s background in economics as well as experience in both online retail and marketing, as well as the early days of Bitcoin growth make him qualified to help lead our company in a new direction.

~~Changes~~Mr. Janosi may terminate our existing business while leveraging our online presence into a new business which will likely be in ~~Control~~the Bitcoin space. Concurrent with our change in directors, we have closed our Surrey office and distribution location. All of our company’s operations are now administered outside of Canada.

~~There are no present arrangements or pledges of the Company’s securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.~~15

20PART III

ITEM 1310. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

~~CERTAIN~~Identification ~~RELATIONSHIPS~~of ~~AND~~Directors ~~RELATED~~and ~~TRANSACTIONS,~~Executive ~~AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE~~Officers

~~Director~~The ~~Independence~~following table sets forth the name and age of our sole director and executive officer:

For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set out in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2). The OTCBB on which shares of common stock are quoted does not have any director independence requirements. The NASDAQ definition of “Independent Officer” means a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.


Name	Age	Position with the Company	Date of Appointment
Peter Janosi	33	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director	April 11, 2014

~~According~~Peter toJanosi is the ~~NASDAQ~~sole ~~definition,~~member ~~Mr. Andersen, Mr. Villines, and Mr. Ku are all independent directors because they are not officers~~ of the Company’s ~~and~~audit ~~they are not beneficial owners of the Common Stock of the Company~~committee.

~~Related~~Term ~~Party~~of ~~Transactions~~Office

1Our officers are appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors and their terms of office are at the discretion of the Board. Our officers serve until the earlier occurrence of the appointment of his or her successor at the next meeting of stockholders, death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. All of our directors hold office until the next annual general meeting of the shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified.

OnBackground ~~June 30, 2010 we issued 4,285,714 (post-split) shares of our common stock to our President, Georges Paquet, at a price of $0.001~~ and ~~1,428,571~~Business (post-split) shares of our common stock to Melany Paquet at a price of $0.001 per share. The shares were issued to both subscribers pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 on the basis that the subscribers represented to us that they were not a “US Person” as such term is defined in Regulation S. Experience

2The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of our sole director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating his principal occupations and employment during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupations or employment were carried on.

OnPeter ~~July~~Janosi, 15President, ~~2010~~Chief weExecutive ~~issued 714~~Officer,~~285~~ ~~(post-split)~~Chief ~~shares~~Financial ofOfficer, ~~our common stock to our President~~Secretary, ~~Georges Paquet~~Treasurer, ~~at a price of $0.001 per share. The shares were issued to Mr. Paquet pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933~~ and~~/or~~ ~~Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 on the basis that Mr. Paquet represented to us that he was not a “US Person” as such term is defined in Regulation S.~~ Director

3Peter Janosi was appointed as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of our company on April 11, 2014. Mr. Jasnosi received his Bachelor of Economics from the Zrinyi Miklós University in Budapest, Hungary and from 2006 to 2013 served as a police officer with the Budapest Police Services. Since 2010, concurrent with his employment as a police officer, Mr. Janosi has been mining and investing in Bitcoins and managing an online retail operation through E-bay. In 2013, Mr. Janosi left the police department to pursue this business full time. Mr. Janosi’s background in economics as well as experience in both online retail and marketing, as well as the early days of Bitcoin growth make him qualified to help lead our company in a new direction.

OnWe ~~December~~believe 8,Mr. ~~2010,~~Janosi ~~the~~is ~~Company~~qualified ~~issued a two year Promissory Note in the principal amount of $25,000~~ to ~~Georges~~serve ~~Paquet,~~on our ~~President.~~board ~~The~~of ~~$25,000~~directors ~~principal~~because ~~amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the two year anniversary~~ of ~~the~~his ~~Note~~education and ~~accrues~~business ~~interest~~experiences atdescribed ~~the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2% per annum~~above.

4.Family Relationships

OnWe ~~July~~currently ~~29,~~do ~~2010,~~not wehave ~~entered~~any ~~into~~officers anor ~~assignment~~directors ~~agreement with Tim Cooksey Oil pursuant to which we acquired a 1.57% working interest in the Charles Prior Project, located in Franklin County, Illinois in consideration~~ of ~~a payment of $25,000. JKV Oil Development, of which~~ our ~~director,~~company ~~Mr.~~who ~~Villines,~~are isrelated ~~the~~to ~~President,~~each ~~owns a five percent (5%) working interest in the Charles Prior Project~~other.

5.Identification of Significant Employees

OnWe ~~December~~have ~~17,~~no ~~2010,~~significant weemployees ~~entered~~other ~~into~~than anPeter ~~assignment~~Janosi, ~~agreement~~our ~~with~~President, ~~JKV~~Chief ~~Oil~~Executive ~~Development~~Officer, ~~pursuant~~Chief toFinancial ~~which~~Officer, weSecretary, ~~acquired~~Treasurer aand 3%Director. We ~~working~~believe ~~interest~~that inuntil ~~wells~~such ~~located~~time inthat ~~Franklin~~we ~~County,~~have ~~Illinois~~fully indeveloped ~~consideration~~our ofplan ~~a payment~~ of ~~$25,000.~~operations ~~JKV~~we ~~Oil~~will ~~Development,~~not ofhave ~~which~~any ~~our~~employees ~~director,~~and ~~Mr.~~that ~~Villines,~~we iswill ~~the~~frequently ~~President,~~use ~~retained~~consultants ato ~~fifteen~~assist ~~percent (15%) working interest~~ in the ~~Sesser~~completion ~~Wells~~of various projects.

6.16

OnInvolvement ~~May 16, 2011, the Company issued a one year Promissory Note~~ in ~~the~~Certain ~~principal~~Legal amount of $5,000 to Georges Paquet, our President. The $5,000 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the one year anniversary of the Note and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2% per annum. Proceedings

7.During the past 10 years no director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Company has been involved in the following:

~~On July 13, 2011, the Company issued a one year Promissory Note in the principal amount of $10,000 to Georges Paquet, our President~~1. The $10,000 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the one year anniversary of the Note and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2% per annum.

8.A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law which was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

On December 14, 2011, the Company issued a one year Promissory Note in the principal amount of $10,000 to Georges Paquet, our President. The $10,000 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the one year anniversary of the Note and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2~~% per annum~~.

~~Other~~Such ~~than the foregoing, none of the directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any~~ person ~~who owned of record or~~ was ~~known~~convicted toin ~~own~~a ~~beneficially~~criminal ~~more~~proceeding ~~than~~or 5%is ofa ~~the~~named ~~Company’s~~subject ~~outstanding shares~~ of ~~its~~a ~~Common~~pending ~~Stock,~~criminal ~~nor~~proceeding ~~any~~(excluding ~~associate~~traffic orviolations ~~affiliate~~and ofother ~~such~~minor persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect the Company. offenses);

21i.

~~With~~Such ~~regard~~person towas the subject of any ~~future~~order, ~~related~~judgment, ~~party~~or ~~transaction~~decree, wenot ~~plan~~subsequently toreversed, ~~fully~~suspended ~~disclose~~or vacated, of any ~~and~~court ~~all~~of ~~related~~competent ~~party~~jurisdiction, ~~transactions~~permanently inor temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following ~~manner~~activities:

·ii.

~~disclosing~~Acting ~~such~~as ~~transactions~~a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in ~~reports~~securities, ~~where~~or ~~required~~as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

·iii.

~~disclosing~~Engaging in any ~~and~~type ~~all~~of ~~filings~~business ~~with the SEC, where required~~practice; or

·iv.

~~obtaining~~Engaging ~~disinterested~~in ~~directors~~any ~~consent;~~activity ~~and~~in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

·3.

~~obtaining~~Such ~~shareholder~~person ~~consent~~was ~~where~~the ~~required.~~subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (2)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

~~Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons~~4.

WeSuch ~~are~~person was found by a ~~smaller~~court ~~reporting~~of ~~company~~competent asjurisdiction ~~defined~~in bya ~~Rule~~civil ~~12b-2~~action ofor by the ~~Securities~~Commission ~~Exchange~~to ~~Act~~have ofviolated ~~1934~~any Federal or State securities law, and ~~are~~the ~~not~~judgment ~~required~~in tosuch ~~provide~~civil action or finding by the ~~information~~Commission ~~under~~has ~~this~~not ~~item.~~been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

~~ITEM 14~~5.

~~PRINCIPAL~~Such ~~ACCOUNTING~~person ~~FEES~~was ~~AND~~found ~~SERVICES~~by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

	Year Ended July 31, 2012	Year Ended July 31, 2011
Audit fees	$12,500	$7,150
Audit-related fees	$0	$0
Tax fees	$0	$0
All other fees	$0	$0
Total	$12,500	$7,150

~~Audit~~Such ~~Fees~~person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2012, we incurred approximately $12,500 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended July 31, 2012i.

~~During~~Any ~~the~~Federal ~~fiscal~~or ~~year~~State ~~ended~~securities ~~July~~or ~~31,~~commodities ~~2011,~~law weor ~~incurred~~regulation; approximately $7,150 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended July 31, 2011. or

~~Audit-Related Fees~~ii.

~~The~~Any ~~aggregate~~law ~~fees~~or ~~billed~~regulation ~~during~~respecting ~~the~~financial ~~fiscal~~institutions ~~years~~or ~~ended~~insurance ~~July~~companies 31including, ~~2012~~but ~~and~~not ~~2011~~limited ~~for~~to, ~~assurance~~a ~~and~~temporary ~~related~~or ~~services~~permanent byinjunction, ~~our~~order ~~principal~~of ~~independent~~disgorgement ~~accountants~~or ~~that~~restitution, ~~are~~civil ~~reasonably~~money ~~related~~penalty toor ~~the~~temporary ~~performance of the audit~~ or ~~review~~permanent ~~of our financial statements (~~cease-and-desist ~~are~~order, ~~not~~or ~~reported~~removal ~~under~~or ~~Item 9(e)(1)~~prohibition oforder; ~~Schedule 14A) was $0 and $0, respectively.~~ or

~~Tax Fees~~iii.

~~The~~Any ~~aggregate~~law ~~fees~~or ~~billed~~regulation ~~during~~prohibiting ~~the~~mail ~~fiscal~~or ~~years~~wire ~~ended~~fraud ~~July~~or ~~31,~~fraud ~~2012~~in ~~and~~connection ~~2011~~with ~~for~~any ~~professional~~business ~~services~~entity; ~~rendered by our principal accountant tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $0 and $0, respectively.~~ or

~~All Other Fees~~7.

~~The~~Such ~~aggregate~~person ~~fees~~was ~~billed~~the ~~during~~subject ~~the~~of, ~~fiscal~~or ~~years~~a ~~ended~~party ~~July~~to, 31any sanction or order, ~~2012~~not ~~and~~subsequently ~~2011~~reversed, ~~for~~suspended ~~products~~or ~~and~~vacated, ~~services~~of ~~provided~~any byself-regulatory ~~our~~organization ~~principal~~(as ~~independent~~defined ~~accountants~~in Section 3(~~other~~a)(26) ~~than~~of the ~~services~~Exchange ~~reported~~Act in(15 ~~Items~~U.S.C. 978c(ea)(126), ~~through~~any 9registered entity (eas defined in Section 1(a)(329) of ~~Schedule~~the ~~14A~~Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29), ~~was~~or $0any ~~and~~equivalent $0exchange, ~~respectively~~association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

2217

~~PART~~Code IVof Ethics

~~ITEM~~Our 15board of directors has not adopted a code of ethics due to the fact that we presently are in the early stage of our operations and we do not have any employees who are not also officers of the Company. We anticipate that we will adopt a code of ethics when we increase the number of our employees.

~~EXHIBITS.~~Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit	Filing
3.01	Articles of Incorporation	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
3.01a	Certificate of Amendment dated October 5, 2010	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
3.01b	Certificate of Change	Filed with the SEC on June 4, 2012 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
3.02	Bylaws	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
10.01	Assignment Agreement dated July 25, 2010 between the Company and Tim Cooksey Oil	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
10.02	Operating Agreement dated July 14, 2010 between the Company and Tim Cooksey Oil	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
10.03	Assignment Agreement dated December 17, 2010 between the Company and JKV Oil Development	Filed with the SEC on April 6, 2011 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A.
10.04	Promissory Note between the Company and Georges Paquet dated December 8, 2010	Filed with the SEC on April 6, 2011, as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A.
10.05	Promissory Note between the Company and Georges Paquet dated May 16, 2011	Filed with the SEC on August 22, 2011 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A.
10.06	Promissory Note between the Company and Georges Paquet dated July 13, 2011	Filed with the SEC on August 22, 2011 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A.
10.07	Promissory Note between the Company and Georges Paquet dated December 14, 2011.	Filed with the SEC on February 6, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A.
10.08	Promissory Note between the Company and Georges Paquet dated April 23, 2012.	Filed with the SEC on May 1, 2012 as part of our Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.
10.09	Promissory Note between the Company and Georges Paquet dated July 8, 2012.	Filed herewith.
10.10	Loan Agreement between the Company and Marilyn Jean Media, Inc. dated August 17, 2012.	Filed herewith.
10.11	Loan Agreement between the Company and Marilyn Jean Media, Inc. dated October 1, 2012.	Filed herewith.
31.01	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14	Filed herewith.
31.02	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14	Filed herewith.
32.01	CEO and CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	Filed herewith.
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith.
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Filed herewith.
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.

We do not yet have a class of equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Hence, compliance with Section 16(a) thereof by our officers and directors is not required.

*PursuantAudit toCommittee Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.Disclosure

23Under Canadian National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”) reporting issuers are required to provide disclosure with respect to its Audit Committee including the text of the Audit Committee’s Charter, composition of the Committee, and the fees paid to the external auditor. We provide the following disclosure with respect to our Audit Committee:

~~SIGNATURES~~Audit Committee Charter

~~Pursuant~~Our toaudit ~~the~~committee ~~requirements~~charter ofwas ~~Section 13~~filed oras ~~15(d)~~Exhibit of99.1 ~~the~~to ~~Securities~~our ~~Exchange~~December ~~Act~~31, of2013 ~~1934,~~annual ~~the~~report ~~Registrant~~on ~~caused~~Form ~~this~~10-K, ~~report~~filed towith bethe ~~signed~~SEC on ~~its~~April ~~behalf~~15, by2014 ~~the~~and ~~undersigned,~~incorporated ~~thereunto~~by ~~duly authorized~~reference.

			FUTURE ENERGY, CORP.
Dated: November 2, 2012			/s/ Georges Paquet
			By: Georges Paquet
			Its: President, CEO, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Director
Dated: November 2, 2012			/s/ Melany Paquet
			By: Melany Paquet
			Its: Vice President and Director

Composition of Audit Committee

~~Pursuant~~The tosole ~~the~~member ~~requirement~~ of ~~the~~our ~~Securities~~Audit ~~Exchange~~Committee ~~Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:~~ is

Dated: November 2, 2012	/s/ Mike Anderson
	By: Mike Anderson Its: Director
Dated: November 2, 2012	/s/Jefferson K. Villines
	By: Jefferson K. Villines
	Its: Director
Dated: November 2, 2012	/s/ Chester Ku
	By: Chester Ku
	Its: Director
Dated: November 2, 2012	/s/ Georges Paquet
	By: Georges Paquet Its: President, CEO, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Director
Dated: November 2, 2012	/s/Melany Paquet
	By: Melany Paquet
	Its: Vice President and Director


Member	Independent⁽¹⁾	Financially Literate⁽²⁾
Peter Janosi	No	Yes

⁽¹⁾

A member of an audit committee is independent if the member has no direct or indirect material relationship with our company, which could, in the view of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a member’s independent judgment.

⁽²⁾

An individual is financially literate if he has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by our financial statements.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that while Mr. Janosi qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, he does not qualify as an "independent" as the term is used by NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2).

Audit Committee Oversight

At no time since the commencement of our most recently completed financial year was a recommendation of the Audit Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor not adopted by the Board.

Reliance on Certain Exemptions

At no time since the commencement of our most recently completed financial year have we relied on the exemption in Section 2.4 of NI 52-110 (De Minimis Non-audit Services), or an exemption from NI 52-110, in whole or in part, granted under Part 8 of NI 52-110.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee is authorized by the Board to review the performance of our external auditors and approve in advance provision of services other than auditing and to consider the independence of the external auditors, including a review of the range of services provided in the context of all consulting services bought by us.

Exemption

We are relying on the exemption provided by section 6.1 of NI 52-110 which provides that we, as a venture issuer, are not required to comply with Part 3 (Composition of the Audit Committee) and Part 5 (Reporting Obligations) of NI 52-110.

Corporate Governance

General

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of our company believes that good corporate governance improves corporate performance and benefits all shareholders. Canadian National Policy 58-201 Corporate Governance Guidelines provides non-prescriptive guidelines on corporate governance practices for reporting issuers such as the Company. In addition, Canadian National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices prescribes certain disclosure by our company of its corporate governance practices. This disclosure is presented below.

Board of Directors

Our sole director is Peter Janosi who is not independent as Mr. Janosi also acts as an officer of the Company.

Directorships

Our sole director is not nor has been a director of any other reporting issuers or equivalent

Orientation and Continuing Education

New Board members receive an orientation package which includes reports on operations and results, and any public disclosure filings by our company, as may be applicable. The Board does not take any steps to provide continuing education for directors.

Ethical Business Conduct

The Board has found that the fiduciary duties placed on individual directors by our governing corporate legislation and the common law and the restrictions placed by applicable corporate legislation on an individual director’s participation in decisions of the Board in which the director has an interest have been sufficient to ensure that the Board operates in the best interests of our company.

Nomination of Directors

The Board considers its size each year when it considers the number of directors to recommend to the shareholders for election at the annual meeting of shareholders, taking into account the number required to carry out the Board’s duties effectively and to maintain a diversity of view and experience.

The Board does not have a nominating committee, and these functions are currently performed by the Board as a whole. However, if there is a change in the number of directors required by our company, this policy will be reviewed.

Compensation

The Board is responsible for determining compensation for the directors of our company to ensure it reflects the responsibilities and risks of being a director of a public company.

Other Board Committees

The Board has no committees other than the Audit Committee.

Assessments

The Board has no formal policy to monitor the effectiveness of the directors, the Board and its committees.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our Bylaws do not restrict our ability to indemnify, to the greatest allowable extent permitted under the General Corporate Laws of Nevada, each director, executive officer, employee and agent and all other persons whom our company is authorized to indemnify under the provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes to the fullest extent of the law (i) against all the expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the individual in connection with any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative, or in connection with any appeal therein, or otherwise, and (ii) against all expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by the individual in connection with the defense or settlement of any action or suit by or in the right of the company, or in connection with any appeal therein, or otherwise, if the individual acted in good faith and in a manner that they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of our company, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that such conduct was unlawful. Our company may, in our discretion, pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred in defending any proceeding in advance of any final disposition, provided, however, that the payment of expenses incurred by a director or executive officer in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by the director or executive officer to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that the director or executive officer is not entitled to be indemnified under our Bylaws or otherwise. Such expenses incurred by other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as our board of directors deems appropriate.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, executive officers and controlling persons of our company under Nevada law or otherwise, our company has been advised that the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission is that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our executive officers during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

Summary Compensation Table


Name And Principal Position	Fiscal Year Ended	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)

Peter Janosi President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer, Secretary & Director ¹	2014 2013	- N/A	- N/A	- N/A	- N/A	- N/A	- N/A	- N/A	- N/A

Jason Carvalho ²	2014 2013	2,445 27,674	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	2,445 27,674

Filip Stoj ³	2014 2013	N/A 26,702	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A 26,702

Georges Paquet ⁴	2014 2013	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -	N/A -

Mr. Janosi was appointed as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and director on April 11, 2014.

Jason Carvalho resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and director on April 11, 2014.

Filip Stoj resigned as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and a director effective November 13, 2013.

⁴

Georges Paquet resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and one of our directors on March 28, 2013.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

Other than noted below, there are no employment contracts, compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from our company with respect to any executive officer, that would result in payments to such person because of his or her resignation, retirement or other termination of employment with our company, or our subsidiaries, any change in control, or a change in the person’s responsibilities following a change in control of our company.

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

No named executive officer or director received any equity awards, or holds exercisable or unexercisable options, as of the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide retirement or similar benefits for our directors or executive officers.

Resignation, Retirement, Other Termination, or Change in Control Arrangements

We have no contract, agreement, plan or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that provides for payments to our directors or executive officers at, following, or in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination of our directors or executive officers, or a change in control of our company or a change in our directors’ or executive officers’ responsibilities following a change in control.

Compensation of Directors

Our directors receive no extra compensation for their service on our board of directors.

Long-Term Incentive Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers.

Compensation Committee

We currently do not have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors as a whole determines executive compensation.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth the amount certain information concerning the number of shares of our common stock owned beneficially as of March 30, 2015 by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) each person or group known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares they own.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title of Class	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		Percentage of Class⁽¹⁾
Peter Janosi Director and Officer 1170 Budapest, Bihari út3/a VIII/26	Common Stock	Nil		Nil
Directors and Executive Officers (1–as a group)	Common Stock	Nil		Nil
Jason Carvalho 5% Stockholder 104-12877 - 76th Avenue Surrey, BC V3W 1E6	Common Stock	22,950,000	Direct ⁽²⁾	11.8%
George Paquet 840–23rd Street St. Georges de Beauce, QC G5Y 4N6	Common Stock	60,000,000	Direct	30.8%
Melany Paquet 1784–87th Street St. Georges de Beauce, QC G6A 1L8	Common Stock	17,142,852	Direct	8.8%
5% Stockholder (1–as a group)	Common Stock

Based on 194,528,352 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 30, 2015.

These shares represent Exchangeable Preferred Shares and are redeemable by the holders into common stock of our company on a one-for-one basis at any time by the holder in accordance with the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, Trust Agreement and Support Agreement. The percentage total is on an undiluted basis.

Changes in Control

There are no present arrangements or pledges of the Company’s securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.

Director Independence

According to the NASDAQ definition, we currently have no independent directors because our sole director is currently an officer of the Company.

Related Party Transactions

Other than as disclosed below, there has been no transaction, since our inception on May 19, 2004, or currently proposed transaction, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of our total assets at year end for the last completed fiscal year, and in which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

Any director or executive officer of our company;

ii.

Any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock;

iii.

Any of our promoters and control persons; and

iv.

Any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in- laws) of any of the foregoing persons.

The following constituted related transactions with our company since inception:

On June 30, 2010 we issued 4,285,714 (post-split) shares of our common stock to our President, Georges Paquet, at a price of $0.001 and 1,428,571 (post-split) shares of our common stock to Melany Paquet at a price of $0.001 per share. The shares were issued to both subscribers pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 on the basis that the subscribers represented to us that they were not a “US Person” as such term is defined in Regulation S.

On July 15, 2010 we issued 714,285 (post-split) shares of our common stock to our President, Georges Paquet, at a price of $0.001 per share. The shares were issued to Mr. Paquet pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 on the basis that Mr. Paquet represented to us that he was not a “US Person” as such term is defined in Regulation S.

On December 8, 2010, our company issued a two year Promissory Note in the principal amount of $25,000 to Georges Paquet, our President. The $25,000 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the two year anniversary of the Note and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2% per annum.

On July 29, 2010, we entered into an assignment agreement with Tim Cooksey Oil pursuant to which we acquired a 1.57% working interest in the Charles Prior Project, located in Franklin County, Illinois in consideration of a payment of $25,000. JKV Oil Development, of which our director, Mr. Villines, is the President, owns a five percent (5%) working interest in the Charles Prior Project.

On December 17, 2010, we entered into an assignment agreement with JKV Oil Development, pursuant to which we acquired a 3% working interest in wells located in Franklin County, Illinois in consideration of a payment of $25,000. JKV Oil Development, of which our director, Mr. Villines, is the President, retained a fifteen percent (15%) working interest in the Sesser Wells.

On May 16, 2011, our company issued a one year Promissory Note in the principal amount of $5,000 to Georges Paquet, our President. The $5,000 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the one year anniversary of the Note and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2% per annum.

On July 13, 2011, our company issued a one year Promissory Note in the principal amount of $10,000 to Georges Paquet, our President. The $10,000 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the one year anniversary of the Note and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2% per annum.

On December 14, 2011, our company issued a one year Promissory Note in the principal amount of $10,000 to Georges Paquet, our President. The $10,000 principal amount underlying the Promissory Note is payable on or before the one year anniversary of the Note and accrues interest at the rate of the Royal Bank of Canada Prime Interest Rate plus 2% per annum.

The following constituted related party transactions with MJM since inception:

During the year ended December 31, 2013, MJM incurred management fees of Cdn$27,674 (2012 - $7,500) to Jason Carvalho the Chief Executive Officer of MJM.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, MJM incurred management fees of Cdn$26,702 (2012 - $7,500) to Filip Stoj, the former Chief Financial Officer of MJM.

Other than the foregoing, none of the directors or executive officers of our company, nor any person who owned of record or was known to own beneficially more than 5% of our company’s outstanding shares of our common stock, nor any associate or affiliate of such persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect our company.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES


	Year Ended December 31, 2014	Year Ended December 31, 2013
Audit fees	$9,500	Cdn $13,600
Audit-related fees	Nil	Cdn $1,200
Tax fees	Nil	Nil
All other fees	Nil	Nil
Total	$9,500	Cdn$14,800

Audit Fees

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, we incurred $9,500 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we incurred Cdn$13,600 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for audit-related services by our principal independent accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements (and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule 14A) was $nil and Cdn$1,200, respectively.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for professional services rendered by our principal accountant tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $nil and $nil, respectively.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for products and services provided by our principal independent accountants (other than the services reported in Items 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A) was $nil and $nil, respectively.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS.


Exhibit No.	Description	Filing
(3)	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.01	Articles of Incorporation	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
3.01a	Certificate of Amendment dated October 5, 2010	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
3.01b	Certificate of Change	Filed with the SEC on June 4, 2012 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
3.01c	Certificate of Designation dated March 26, 2013	Filed with the SEC on March 26, 2013 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K
3.02	Bylaws	Filed with the SEC on October 28, 2010 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
3.03	Articles of Merger dated April 4, 2013	Filed with the SEC on April 8, 2013 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K
(10)	Material Contracts
10.01	Share Exchange Agreement with Marilyn Jean Media, Inc. dated March 25, 2013	Filed with the SEC on March 26, 2013 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K
10.02	Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement dated March 28, 2013 among our company, MarilynJean Holdings Inc. and Chester Ku	Filed with the SEC on April 3, 2013 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K
10.03	Exchangeable Share Support Agreement dated March 28, 2013 between our company and MarilynJean Holdings Inc.	Filed with the SEC on April 3, 2013 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K
(21)	Subsidiaries
21.1	MarilynJean Holdings Inc. (British Columbia)
(31)	Section 302 Certification
31.1*	Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Peter Janosi
(32)	Section 906 Certification
32.1*	Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1	Audit Committee Charter	Filed with the SEC on April 15, 2014 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
(101)	XBRL
101.INS**	XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
101.SCH**	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
101.CAL**	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
101.DEF**	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
101.LAB**	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
101.PRE**	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

Filed herewith

^**

Pursuant to Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	MARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.


	By: /s/Peter Janosi
	Its: President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Director
	Dated April 15, 2015

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:


	MARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.


	By: /s/Peter Janosi
	Its: President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Director
	Dated April 15, 2015

Filing Compare · MARILYNJEAN INTERACTIVE INC.