UNITED ~~STATESSECURITIES~~STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2014~~ 2014

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number: 000-27195

DLD GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA	98-0117139
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employee Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

25 Fordham Drive Buffalo, New York ~~14216~~ 14216(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(716) 868-6789 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [X] No [ ]

The registrant had 100,184 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, outstanding as of ~~August~~November 56, 2014.

DLD GROUP, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q September 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q June 30, 2014

	PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5

	PART II— OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	6
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	6
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	6
Item 5.	Other Information	6
Item 6.	Exhibits	7

	SIGNATURES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	6
	PART II— OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	6
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	7
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	7
Item 5.	Other Information	7
Item 6.	Exhibits	7
	SIGNATURES

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

We cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, such information should not be regarded as representations that the results or conditions described in such statements or that our objectives and plans will be achieved and we do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about potential acquisition or merger targets; business strategies; future cash flows; financing plans; plans and objectives of management; any other statements regarding future acquisitions, future cash needs, future operations, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.

These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

DLD Group, Inc.

~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013

Index to the Financial Statements

Contents	Page(s)
Balance sheets at June 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013	F-2
Balance sheets at September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013	F-2
Statements of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)	F-3
Statements of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)	F-3
Statement of stockholders’ deficit for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period ended June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)	F-4
Statement of stockholders’ deficit for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the interim period ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)	F-4
Statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)	F-5
Statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)	F-5
Notes to the financial statements (Unaudited)	F-6

F-1

DLD Group, Inc. Balance Sheets

Balance Sheets

		September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash	$	15,258		$	569
Prepaid legal fees		10,000			-

Total Current Assets		25,258			569

Furniture and equipment
Furniture and equipment		3,982			3,982
Accumulated depreciation		(2,107	)		(1,428	)

Furniture and equipment, net		1,875			2,554

Total Assets	$	27,133		$	3,123

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	9,288		$	5,935
Advances from a related party		60,000			-
Total Current Liabilities		69,288			5,935

Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock par value $0.01: 500,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock par value $0.001: 200,000,000 shares authorized; 100,215 shares issued and outstanding		100			100
Additional paid - in capital		8,356,435			8,299,396
Accumulated deficit		(8,398,690	)		(8,302,308	)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(42,155	)		(2,812	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	27,133		$	3,123

		June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	24,986		$	569
Prepaid legal fees		10,000			-
Total Current Assets		34,986			569
Furniture and equipment
Furniture and equipment		3,982			3,982
Accumulated depreciation		(1,880	)		(1,428	)
Furniture and equipment, net		2,102			2,554
Total Assets	$	37,088		$	3,123
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	9,359		$	5,935
Advances from related party		60,000			-
Total Liabilities		69,359			5,935
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share: 500,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized; 100,184 shares issued and outstanding		100			100
Additional paid - in capital		8,338,435			8,299,396
Accumulated deficit		(8,370,806	)		(8,302,308	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(32,271	)		(2,812	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	37,088		$	3,123

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-2

DLD Group, Inc. Statements of Operations

Statements of Operations

		For the Three Months						For the Nine Months
		Ended						Ended
		September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013			September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating Expenses
In-kind services		18,000			18,000			54,000			54,000
Professional fees		4,530			5,369			19,992			29,433
General and administrative expenses		5,202			5,217			21,957			16,360

Total Operating Expenses		27,732			28,586			95,949			99,793

Loss from operations		(27,732	)		(28,586	)		(95,949	)		(99,793	)

Other (Income) Expense
Interest expense		152			-			433			-

Other Income (Expenses) , net		152			-			433			-
Loss Before Income Tax Provision		(27,884	)		(28,586	)		(96,382	)		(99,793	)

Income Tax Provision		-			-			-			-

Net Loss	$	(27,884	)	$	(28,586	)	$	(96,382	)	$	(99,793	)

Net loss per common share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.96	)	$	(1.00	)

Weighted average common shares oustanding - Basic and Diluted		100,215			100,215			100,215			100,215

		For the Three Months						For the Six Months
		Ended						Ended
		June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Operating Expenses
In-kind services		18,000			18,000			36,000			36,000
Professional fees		8,423			8,006			15,462			24,064
General and administrative expenses		16,529			4,909			16,755			11,143
Total Operating Expenses		42,952			30,915			68,217			71,207
Loss from operations		(42,952	)		(30,915	)		(68,217	)		(71,207	)
Other (Income) Expense
Interest expense		281			-			281			-
Other Income (Expenses) , net		281			-			281			-
Loss Before Income Tax Provision		(42,233	)		(30,915	)		(68,498	)		(71,207	)
Income Tax Provision		-			-			-			-
Net Loss	$	(42,233	)	$	(30,915	)	$	(68,498	)	$	(71,207	)
Net loss per common share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.71	)
Weighted average common shares oustanding - Basic and Diluted		100,184			100,184			100,184			100,184

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-3

DLD Group, Inc. Statement of Stockholders' Deficit For the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the Interim Period Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)

	Common stock $0.001 par value				Additional					Total
	Number of				Paid-in		Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2012	100,~~184~~215	$	100	$	8,170,529	$	(8,173,838	)	$	(3,209	)
In kind contribution - services	-		-		72,000		-			72,000
Contributed capital by former officer	-		-		1,000		-			1,000
Contributed capital by director	-		-		55,867		-			55,867
Net loss	-		-				(128,470	)		(128,470	)
Balance, December 31, 2013	100,~~184~~215		100		8,299,396		(8,302,308	)		(2,812	)
In kind contribution - services	-		-		3654,000		-			3654,000
Contributed capital by director					3,039					3,039
Contributed capital by a director	-		-		3,039		-			3,039
Net loss	-		-				(6896,~~498~~382	)		(6896,~~498~~382	)
Balance, June 30, 2014	100,184	$	100	$	8,338,435	$	(8,370,806	)	$	(32,271	)
Balance, September 30, 2014	100,215	$	100	$	8,356,435	$	(8,398,690	)	$	(42,155	)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-4

DLD Group, Inc. Statements of Cash Flows

Statements of Cash Flows

		For the Nine Months
		Ended
		September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(96,382	)	$	(99,793	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation expense		679			678
In-kind contribution services		54,000			54,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Prepaid legal fees		(10,000	)		-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		3,353			1,624
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(48,351	)		(43,491	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Advances from a related party		60,000			-
Capital contribution		3,039			44,060
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		63,039			44,060

Net change in cash		14,689			569

Cash, beginning of period		569			-

Cash, end of period	$	15,258		$	569

Supplemental Information:

Interest paid	$	433		$	-

Income tax paid	$	-		$	-

		For the Six Months
		Ended
		June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(68,498	)	$	(71,207	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation expense		452			452
In-kind contribution services		36,000			36,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Prepaid legal fees		(10,000	)		-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		3,424			(675	)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(38,622	)		(35,430	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Advances from (repayments to) related party		60,000			-
Capital contribution		3,039			35,999
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		63,039			35,999
Net change in cash		24,417			569
Cash, beginning of period		569			-
Cash, end of period	$	24,986		$	569
Supplemental Information:
Interest paid	$	281		$	-
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-

See accompanying unaudited notes to financial statements

F-5

DLD Group, Inc. ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Operations

DLD Group, Inc.

Europa Resources Inc. ("Europa") was incorporated on June 25, 1997 under the laws of the State of Nevada.

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation on May 14, 1999

On May 14, 1999, the Board of the Directors of the Company unanimously adopted resolutions declaring the advisability of, and recommended that Stockholders approve the amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize the Company to file a certificate of amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to (1) change the name of the Company from Europa Resources Inc. to EWRX Internet Systems, Inc. (“EWRX”) and (2) increase the number of authorized shares of common stock par value $0.001 from Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares to One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares. In connection with the adoption of these resolutions, the board elected to seek the written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. On May 14, 2009, stockholders owning ~~approximately~~ more than 50% of the common stock, consented in writing to the adoption of these resolutions. The amendment became effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of ~~the~~ State of ~~the State of~~ Nevada on May 18, 1999.

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation on August 5, 2012

On August 5, 2012, the board of directors of the Company approved, subject to receiving the approval of the holders of a majority of its outstanding common stock, an amendment of its articles of incorporation to change its name from EWRX Internet Systems, Inc. to DLD Group, Inc. (“the Company”) to better identify its future business endeavors. On August 23, 2012, a stockholder holding approximately 65% of its outstanding shares approved the amendment pursuant to written consent. The amendment effectuating the change of its corporate name became effective upon filing the certificate of amendment with the Secretary of State of ~~the State of~~ Nevada on October 9, 2012.

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation – Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for the interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014.

Development Stage Company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Company is devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company's development stage activities.

F-6

The Company ~~is considered a development stage company. The Company~~ has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. Upon adoption, the Company no longer presents or discloses inception-to-date information and other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i) Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business; (ii) Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events. (iii) Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

F-7

Level 1	Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2	Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3	Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid legal fees, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted ~~paragraph~~Section 360-10-35~~-17~~ of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. ~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company’s~~to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived ~~assets,~~asset ~~which~~(asset ~~include~~group) ~~furniture~~is not recoverable and exceeds ~~equipment,~~its ~~are~~fair ~~reviewed~~value. ~~for~~The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) ~~impairment~~is ~~whenever~~not ~~events~~recoverable orif ~~changes~~it inexceeds ~~circumstances~~the ~~indicate~~sum ~~that~~of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset ~~may~~shall ~~not~~be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be ~~recoverable~~depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.

~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~assesses~~ASC ~~the~~Paragraph ~~recoverability~~360-10-35-21 ofthe ~~its~~Company’s long-lived ~~assets~~asset by(asset ~~comparing~~group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the ~~projected~~following ~~undiscounted~~to ~~net~~be ~~cash~~some ~~flows~~examples ~~associated~~of ~~with~~such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the ~~related~~market price of a long-lived asset or(asset group); of(b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived ~~assets~~asset ~~over~~(asset ~~their~~group) ~~remaining~~is ~~estimated~~being ~~useful~~used ~~lives~~or ~~against~~in ~~their~~its ~~respective~~physical ~~carrying~~condition; ~~amounts.~~(c) ~~Impairment,~~A ifsignificant adverse change in ~~any,~~legal isfactors ~~based~~or onin the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the ~~carrying~~ amount originally ~~over~~expected for the ~~fair~~acquisition ~~value~~or construction of ~~those~~a long-lived asset ~~assets.~~(asset ~~Fair~~group); ~~value~~(e) isA ~~generally~~current-period ~~determined~~operating ~~using~~or ~~the~~cash ~~asset’s~~flow ~~expected~~loss ~~future~~combined with a ~~discounted~~history of operating or cash ~~flows~~flow losses or ~~market~~a ~~value,~~projection ifor ~~readily~~forecast ~~determinable.~~that demonstrates Ifcontinuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset ~~assets~~(asset ~~are~~group); ~~determined~~and to(f) beA ~~recoverable~~current expectation that, ~~but~~more ~~the~~likely ~~newly~~than ~~determined~~not, ~~remaining~~a ~~estimated~~long-lived ~~useful~~asset ~~lives~~(asset ~~are~~group) ~~shorter~~will ~~than~~be ~~originally~~sold ~~estimated,~~or ~~the~~otherwise ~~net~~disposed ~~book~~of ~~values~~significantly ofbefore the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets ~~are~~for ~~depreciated~~potential ~~over~~impairment ~~the~~indicators ~~newly~~at ~~determined~~least ~~remaining~~annually ~~estimated~~and ~~useful~~more ~~lives~~frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~considers~~ASC ~~the~~Paragraphs ~~following~~360-10-45-4 toand be360-10-45-5 ~~some examples of~~an ~~important~~impairment ~~indicators~~loss ~~that~~recognized ~~may~~for ~~trigger~~a anlong-lived ~~impairment~~asset ~~review:~~ (iasset group) ~~significant under-performance or losses of assets relative~~ to ~~expected~~be ~~historical~~held orand ~~projected~~used ~~future~~shall ~~operating~~be ~~results;~~included ~~(ii)~~in ~~significant~~income ~~changes~~from incontinuing ~~the~~operations ~~manner~~before orincome taxes ~~use~~in ofthe ~~assets~~income orstatement inof ~~the~~a ~~Company’s~~business ~~overall~~entity. ~~strategy~~If ~~with~~a ~~respect~~subtotal tosuch ~~the~~as ~~manner~~income orfrom ~~use~~operations ofis ~~the~~presented, ~~acquired~~it ~~assets~~shall orinclude ~~changes~~the inamount ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~that ~~overall~~loss. ~~business~~A gain or ~~strategy;~~loss ~~(iii)~~recognized ~~significant~~on ~~negative~~the ~~industry~~sale orof ~~economic~~a ~~trends;~~long-lived asset (ivdisposal group) ~~increased~~that is not a ~~competitive~~component ~~pressures;~~of ~~(v)~~an aentity ~~significant~~shall ~~decline~~be included in ~~the~~income ~~Company’s~~from ~~stock~~continuing ~~price~~operations ~~for~~before aincome ~~sustained~~taxes ~~period~~in ofthe ~~time;~~income ~~and~~statement ~~(vi)~~of ~~regulatory~~a ~~changes~~business entity. ~~The~~If ~~Company~~a subtotal ~~evaluates~~such ~~acquired~~as ~~assets~~income ~~for~~from ~~potential~~operations ~~impairment~~is ~~indicators~~presented, atit ~~least~~shall ~~annually and~~include ~~more frequently upon~~ the ~~occurrence~~amounts of those ~~such~~gains ~~events~~or losses.

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

F-8

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the declining balance method as follow:

Computer equipment	30%	~~30%~~
Furniture and fixture		20%
Furniture and fixtures	20%

F-8

Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of(“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate ~~separate~~ interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitment and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

F-9

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

F-9

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

~~Uncertain~~ Tax years that remain subject to ~~Positions~~examination by major tax jurisdictions

The Company ~~did~~discloses ~~not take any uncertain~~ tax ~~positions~~years ~~and~~that ~~had~~remain nosubject to ~~adjustments~~examination toby ~~its~~major ~~income~~ tax ~~liabilities~~jurisdictions ~~or benefits~~ pursuant to the ~~provisions~~ASC Paragraph ~~of Section~~ 740-10-~~25 for the reporting period ended June 30, 2014 or 2013~~50-15.

~~Net~~Earnings ~~Income (Loss)~~ per ~~Common~~ Share

~~Net~~Earnings ~~income~~per share (~~loss~~"EPS") ~~per~~is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section ~~section~~ 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. ~~Basic~~Pursuant ~~net~~to ASC ~~income~~Paragraphs ~~(loss)~~260-10-45-10 ~~per~~through ~~common~~260-10-45-16 ~~share~~Basic isEPS shall be computed by dividing ~~net~~ income available to common stockholders (~~loss~~the numerator) by the weighted -average number of ~~shares of~~ common ~~stock~~shares outstanding ~~during~~(the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by ~~Diluted~~deducting ~~net~~both ~~income~~the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (~~loss~~whether or not paid) ~~per~~and ~~common~~the ~~share~~dividends isaccumulated ~~computed~~for bythe ~~dividing~~period ~~net~~on ~~income~~cumulative preferred stock (~~loss~~whether or not earned) byfrom income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the ~~weighted~~income ~~average~~statement) ~~number~~and also from net income. The computation of ~~shares~~diluted EPS is similar to the computation of ~~common~~basic ~~stock~~EPS ~~and~~except that ~~potentially~~the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common ~~dilutive~~shares that would have been outstanding ~~shares~~if ofthe dilutive potential common ~~stock~~shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent ~~share~~shares ~~arrangements~~issuance arrangement, stock options ~~and~~or warrants.

~~There~~Pursuant ~~were~~to noASC ~~potentially~~Paragraphs ~~dilutive~~260-10-45-45-21 ~~common~~through 260-10-45-45-23 ~~shares~~Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued ~~for~~by the reporting ~~period~~entity ~~ended~~shall ~~June~~be 30reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, ~~2014~~stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or ~~2013~~at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.

F-10

There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 or 2013.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

F-10

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.

Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.

The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.

The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.

In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)

This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

1. Identify the contract(s) with the customer 2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3. Determine the transaction price 4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations

The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

1. Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations) 2. Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations 3. Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.

The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.

F-11

The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations.

Finally, the amendments remove paragraph 810-10-15-16. Paragraph 810-10-15-16 states that a development stage entity does not meet the condition in paragraph 810-10-15-14(a) to be a variable interest entity if (1) the entity can demonstrate that the equity invested in the legal entity is sufficient to permit it to finance the activities that it is currently engaged in and (2) the entity’s governing documents and contractual arrangements allow additional equity investments.

The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage.

The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.

F-11

Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915.

In ~~June~~August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-1215 “~~Compensation—Stock~~Presentation ~~Compensation~~of Financial Statements—Going Concern (~~Topic~~Subtopic ~~718~~205-40) : ~~Accounting~~Disclosure ~~for Share-Based~~of ~~Payments~~Uncertainties ~~When~~about ~~the Terms of~~ an ~~Award~~Entity’s ~~Provide~~Ability ~~That a Performance~~to ~~Target~~ Continue ~~Could~~as Bea ~~Achieved~~Going ~~after~~Concern ~~the Requisite Service Period”~~ (“ASU 2014-1215”).

~~The~~In ~~amendments~~connection ~~clarify~~with ~~the~~preparing ~~proper~~financial ~~method~~statements offor ~~accounting~~each annual ~~for~~and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate ~~share-based~~whether ~~payments~~there ~~when~~are ~~the~~conditions ~~terms~~or ofevents, anconsidered ~~award~~in ~~provide~~the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a ~~performance~~going concern ~~target~~within ~~could~~one beyear ~~achieved~~after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the ~~requisite~~date ~~service~~that ~~period~~the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). ~~The~~Management’s ~~Update~~evaluation ~~requires~~should be ~~that~~based aon ~~performance~~relevant ~~target~~conditions and events that ~~affects~~are ~~vesting~~known and reasonably knowable at the date that ~~could~~the befinancial ~~achieved~~statements ~~after~~are issued (or at the date that the ~~requisite~~financial ~~service~~statements ~~period~~are beavailable ~~treated~~to asbe aissued ~~performance~~when ~~condition~~applicable). ~~The~~ ~~performance~~Substantial ~~target~~doubt ~~should~~about ~~not~~an beentity’s ~~reflected~~ability into ~~estimating~~continue ~~the~~as ~~grant-date~~a ~~fair~~going concern ~~value~~exists ofwhen ~~the~~relevant ~~award.~~conditions ~~Compensation~~and ~~cost~~events, ~~should~~considered ~~be recognized~~ in the ~~period in~~aggregate, ~~which~~indicate that it ~~becomes~~is probable that the ~~performance~~entity ~~target~~ will be ~~achieved~~unable ~~and~~to meet its ~~should~~obligations ~~represent~~as ~~the~~they ~~compensation~~become ~~cost~~due ~~attributable~~within toone year after the ~~period~~date that the financial statements are issued (sor available to be issued). ~~for~~The ~~which~~term probable is ~~the~~used ~~requisite~~consistently ~~service~~with ~~has~~its ~~already~~use ~~been~~in ~~rendered~~Topic 450, Contingencies.

~~The~~When ~~amendments~~management inidentifies ~~this~~conditions ~~Update~~or ~~are~~events ~~effective~~that ~~for~~raise substantial ~~annual~~doubt ~~periods~~about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, ~~and~~management ~~interim~~should ~~periods~~consider ~~within~~whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant ~~annual~~conditions ~~periods~~or ~~beginning~~events ~~after~~will ~~December~~alleviate 15the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if ~~2015.~~so, ~~Earlier~~(2) ~~adoption~~it is ~~permitted~~probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

~~Management~~If ~~does~~conditions ~~not~~or ~~believe~~events ~~that~~raise ~~any~~substantial ~~other~~doubt ~~recently~~about ~~issued~~an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is ~~not~~alleviated ~~yet~~as ~~effective~~a ~~accounting~~result ~~pronouncements,~~of ifconsideration ~~adopted,~~of ~~would~~management’s ~~have~~plans, athe ~~material~~entity should ~~effect~~disclose oninformation ~~the~~that ~~accompanying~~enables users of the financial statements. to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):

	a.	Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

	a.	Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The ~~financial~~Company ~~statements~~has ~~have~~elected ~~been~~to ~~prepared~~adopt ~~assuming~~early ~~that~~application ~~the~~of ~~Company~~Accounting ~~will~~Standards ~~continue~~Update asNo. a2014-15, ~~going~~“Presentation ~~concern,~~of ~~which~~Financial Statements—Going ~~contemplates~~Concern ~~continuity~~(Subtopic ~~of operations,~~205-40): ~~realization~~Disclosure of ~~assets,~~Uncertainties ~~and~~about ~~liquidation~~an Entity’s ofAbility ~~liabilities~~to inContinue ~~the~~as ~~normal course~~a ofGoing ~~business~~Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

AsThe ~~reflected~~Company's ~~in the~~ financial statements, ~~the~~have ~~Company~~been ~~had~~prepared anassuming ~~accumulated~~that ~~deficit~~it atwill ~~June~~continue ~~30,~~as ~~2014,~~ a ~~net~~going ~~loss~~concern, ~~and~~which ~~net~~contemplates ~~cash~~continuity ~~used in operating~~of ~~activities~~operations, ~~for~~realization ~~the~~of ~~reporting~~assets, ~~period~~and ~~then~~liquidation ~~ended.~~of ~~These~~liabilities ~~factors~~in ~~raise~~the ~~substantial~~normal ~~doubt~~course ~~about~~of ~~the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern~~business.

The Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

F-12

As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Property and Equipment

(i) Impairment

The Company completed the annual impairment test of property and equipment and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of property and equipment, substantially exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2013.

(ii) Depreciation Expense

Depreciation expense was $~~452~~678 ~~each~~per period for the ~~reporting~~nine ~~period~~months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note 5 6– Stockholders’ Deficit

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Fifty Million and Five Hundred Thousand (50,500,000) shares of which Five Hundred Thousand (500,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share.

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation on May 14, 1999

On May 14, 1999, the Board of the Directors of the Company unanimously adopted resolutions declaring the advisability of, and recommended that Stockholders approve the amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize the Company to file a certificate of amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to ~~(1) change the name of the Company from Europa Resources Inc. to EWRX Internet Systems, Inc. (“EWRX”) and (2)~~ increase the number of authorized shares of common stock par value $0.001 from Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares to One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares. In connection with the adoption of ~~these~~ the resolutions, the board elected to seek the written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. On May 14, 2009, stockholders owning ~~approximately~~ more than 50% of the common stock, consented in writing to the adoption of ~~these~~ the resolutions. The amendment became effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of ~~the~~ State of ~~the State of~~ Nevada on May 18, 1999.

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation on November 5, 2009

On November 5, 2009, the Board of the Directors of the Company unanimously adopted resolutions declaring the advisability of, and recommended that Stockholders approve the amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize the Company to file a certificate of amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock par value $0.001 from One Hundred Ten Million (100,000,000) shares to Two Hundred Million (200,000,000) shares. In connection with the adoption of ~~these~~the resolutions, the board elected to seek the written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. On November 5, 2009, stockholders owning approximately 72% of the common stock, consented in writing to the adoption of ~~these~~ the resolutions. The amendment became effective upon the filing of the ~~Certificate~~ Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of ~~the State of~~ ~~the~~ State of Nevada on November 5, 1999.

F-13

Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporations Authorizing 1-for-1,000 Reverse Stock Split

On January 10, 2014, the Board of the Directors of the Company unanimously adopted resolutions declaring the advisability of, and recommended that Stockholders approve the amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize a reverse split of one-for-one thousand of its shares of ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock. In connection with the adoption of ~~these~~the resolutions, the board elected to seek the written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. On January 10, 2014, Mr. Fenglin Wang, who ~~owns~~owned 65.84% of common stock then, consented in writing to the reverse stock split. The reverse ~~stock~~ stock split became effective on May 2, 2014.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the reverse stock split.

F-13

Additional Paid-in Capital

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company ~~recorded~~ recorded as additional paid-in capital $3654,000 of in-kind services provided to ~~the~~ the Company by its chairman and chief executive officer.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Chairman and CEO of the Company paid $3,039 in expenses on behalf of the Company which ~~was~~ was recorded as additional paid in capital.

Note 6 7– Related Party Transactions

Related Parties

Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:

Related Parties Relationship DLD International Group Limited (“DLD International”) An entity controlled by Chairman and CEO Fenglin Wang Chairman, CEO, significant stockholder and director

Advances from a Related Party

From time to time, a related party advances funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

ADLD ~~related~~International ~~party~~ advanced $60,000 for the reporting period ~~ended~~ ~~June~~ended September 30, 2014, none of which ~~had~~has been repaid. The advance is interest free, due on demand and without collateral.

Note 7 8– Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed.

F-14

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results, expectations and plans discussed in these forward-looking statements.

Overview

The Company engaged in limited operations of software development. The Company has ceased such operations and has had no operations or business.

The current management, appointed upon the consummation of a change of control occurred in ~~July~~August 2012, is presently working to acquire a company that focuses on exporting products made in the United States to China via an online shopping service platform. As of the date of this filing, the acquisition of this Company has not been consummated.

The Company does not currently engage in any business activity that provides cash flow. During the next twelve months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

	(i)	filing Exchange Act reports; and
	(ii)	consummating an acquisition.

We have historically financed our operations through funds advanced from related parties. Prior to the anticipated acquisition, we plan to continue to rely upon the issuance of common stock and loans from related parties to fund administrative expenses. However, no related parties are contractually obligated to provide such funding. There is no assurance that additional funding will be available to us.

We presently have no employees apart from our management. We expect no significant changes in the number of our employees other than such changes, if any, incident to a business combination.

Recent Development

Reverse Split

On January 10, 2014, the Company’s board and majority stockholders approved a ~~1000~~reverse ~~for~~split of 1- for-1000 reverse split of all of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company (the “Reverse Split”). On April 14, 2014, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation regarding the Reverse Split. On May 2, 2014, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced the Reverse Split. Immediately following the effectiveness of the Reverse Split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock was 100,~~184~~215.

Change in Control

Effective as of May 6, 2014, Wenyi Yu and Wenyong Wang each resigned as a member of the board of directors. Mr. Yu and Mr. Wang’s resignations were not due to any disagreements with us or any of our operations, policies or practices. Immediately following Mr. Yu and Mr. Wang’s resignations, the board of directors appointed Keren Zhao, our Chief Executive Officer, as a member of our board of directors.

On June 11, 2014, certain of our stockholders, including Fenglin Wang, Wenyong Wang, Fang Wang, and Jihua Bao, sold a total of 71,500 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 71.4% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock to Marcel A. Willoughby pursuant to a stock purchase agreement dated June 11, 2014. As a result, Marcel A. Willoughby became the principal stockholder of the Company, holding 71.4% of the outstanding common stock.

Results of Operations

We have not had any revenue since we re-entered into the development stage on January 1, 2002. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2014~~ 2014 and 2013 we incurred a net loss of $4227,~~671~~884 and $3028,~~915,~~586 respectively. For ~~the~~ ~~six~~the Nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 we incurred a net loss of $6896,~~498~~382 and $7199,~~207,~~793 respectively. Expenses for these periods were comprised of costs mainly associated with legal, accounting and office expense.

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit at ~~June~~September 30, 2014, a net loss and cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors ~~raise~~ raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ~~ability~~ ability of the Company to continue as a going concern has been, and remains, ~~dependent~~ dependent on advances from related parties and the Company's ability to raise ~~additional~~ additional capital. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had $2415,~~986~~258 of cash on hand. ~~The~~ The Company requires additional funding to meet its ongoing obligations and to ~~fund~~ fund anticipated operating losses. Historically the Company had successfully obtained additional capital from advances from certain related parties. We plan to continue to rely upon advances from related parties to fund our administrative expenses. However, no related parties are contractually obligated to provide such funding. There is no assurance that additional funding will be available to us.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company's financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to U.S. GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our condensed financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Principal Executive Officer and interim Principal Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and interim Principal Accounting Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Company's Principal Executive Officer and interim Principal Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls

No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1+	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Schedule
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase

+In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and not filed.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DLD GROUP, INC.
Date: August 8, 2014	By: /s/ Keren Zhao
Date: November 6, 2014	By: /s/ Keren Zhao
	Keren Zhao
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Executive
	Officer and interim Principal Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · DLD Group, Inc.