UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2010

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2009

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________________to __________________

For the transition period from __________________to __________________

Commission file number: 000-49833

ACRONGENOMICS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	52-2219285
State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization	Identification No.)

Fairfax House, 15 Fulwood Place, London UK WC1V 6AY
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

Registrant'’s telephone number, including area code 30 697 724 3620

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act

Title of Each Class	Name of each Exchange on which registered
Nil	N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X ] No [ X]

- ii -

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
(Not currently applicable to registrant) Yes [ ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $52,~~864~~275,~~166~~449 based on a price of $0.2610 per share, being the ~~average~~closing ~~of the bid and asked~~ price of the registrant’s common stock as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board on June 30, ~~2009~~2010.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes[ ] No[ ] N/A

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 25 28,~~580~~858,481 shares of common stock as of ~~April~~March 712, ~~2010~~2012.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).
Not Applicable

- ii -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I		1
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	1
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	9
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	13
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	13
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	14
ITEM 4.	[REMOVED AND RESERVED]	14
PART II		14
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	14
ITEM 6	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	16
ITEM 7	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION	16
ITEM 7A	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	23
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	24
ITEM 9B	OTHER INFORMATION	27
PART III		28
ITEM 10	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	28
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	32
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.	34
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	36
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	37
PART IV		39
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.	39
SIGNATURES		41

- iii -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I		1
	ITEM 1. BUSINESS	1
	ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	10
	ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	14
	ITEM 2. PROPERTIES	14
	ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	14
	ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]	14

PART II		14
	ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	14
	ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	17
	ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION	17
	ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	24
	ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	24
	ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	26
	ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	26
	ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION	27

PART III		28
	ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	28
	ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	31
	ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	33
	ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	34
	ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	36

PART IV		37
	ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.	37

PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” commencing on page 810 of this report, which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this annual report include statements regarding, by way of example and not in limitation:

~~the~~our plans ofwith ~~Molecular~~respect ~~Vision~~to Vardisto Investments Limited, Halldale Ventures Limited, and Irwingom Ventures Limited;
~~our~~the ~~intention~~plans toof ~~acquire additional shares in~~ Molecular Vision Limited;
our intention to close the share exchange transaction with Vardisto;
our belief that certain products will be classified in certain categories for regulator purposes; and
our cash requirements for the next 12 months.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

In this report, unless otherwise specified, all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares of our capital stock.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, and “our”~~, and~~ ~~“Acrongenomics”~~ refer to Acrongenomics, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Vardisto Investments Limited, Halldale Ventures Limited and Irwingom Ventures Limited, unless otherwise indicated. All references to “£” means the Pound Sterling and to $ means United ~~States~~ States dollars.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Corporate Overview

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 17, 1999 under the name “Cellway Ventures Inc.” On February 25, 2004, we changed the name of our company to “Acrongenomics, Inc.”

We are a development stage company that focuses on investing and commercializing novel technology platforms concerning the life sciences sector. We intend to focus and devote resources and time on our recent acquisition of Vardisto Investments Limited, as described below. We are looking for potential investors or partners that would be interested in completing the development of our point-of-care testing device for diabetes management and cardiovascular testing. Previously, we were engaged solely in the business of the development and commercialization of the BioLED Technology, which combines microfluidics and polymer Light Emitting Diodes (“pLED”) for use in future point-of-care diagnostic devices, under various joint development agreement with ~~Molecular~~ Molecular Vision Limited (“Molecular Vision”). Molecular Vision owns the BioLED ~~technology~~ technology and we had the right to develop and commercialize it in exchange for a royalty. On August 19, 2008, we entered into a new agreement with Molecular Vision. Upon the closing of the new agreement with Molecular Vision, our joint ~~development~~ development agreement was cancelled in exchange for 25% of the issued and outstanding shares of Molecular Vision. As a result of this new arrangement, we have ~~intend~~been ~~to be~~ much less involved with the development of the BioLED technology than we ~~have~~had been in the past and we ~~intend~~have tofocused ~~focus~~ instead on acquiring an interest in ~~another~~ another technology through obtaining ~~approximately 60~~100% of the issued and outstanding ~~shares~~ shares of Vardisto Investments Limited (“Vardisto”). However, we are still ~~interested~~ interested in the BioLED technology and intend to continue to work toward finding ~~more~~investors or ~~uses~~partners ~~for it~~ in the market. In July 2009, we purchased 19,426 preferred shares of Molecular Vision for $275,000 ~~USD~~ (£166.042) . These preferred shares are convertible into Class B common shares of Molecular Vision at the rate of one Class B common share for each preferred share held. As of ~~April~~ 7December 31, 2010, we hold 33,734 shares in the common stock and 19,426 shares in the preferred stock of Molecular Vision., Wewhich ~~hold~~ is approximately 17.2% of the issued and outstanding shares of Molecular Vision.

- 12 -

~~Corporate~~In ~~History~~our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, we wrote-down our investment in Molecular Vision due to minimal cash flow available in Molecular Vision and lack of finding suitable investors or partners interested in developing that technology.

~~Initially,~~On weDecember ~~focused~~29, ~~our~~2010, ~~research~~we ~~and~~completed ~~development efforts in~~ the Inacquisition ~~Vitro~~of ~~Diagnostic~~100% ~~sector. Our first product was the EP-CAM™ Detection Kit~~of (the ~~“EP~~total ~~Kit”),~~outstanding ~~which~~share ~~was~~capital ~~a molecular diagnostic test for micrometastatic cancer~~ of ~~epithelial~~Vardisto ~~origin~~Investments Limited. In consideration ~~connection~~for ~~with our development of~~ the EPtotal ~~Kit~~shares outstanding, we ~~entered~~ ~~into~~issued a ~~strategic~~promissory ~~collaboration~~note ~~with~~to Inter ~~EuroGenet~~Jura ~~Labs~~CY ~~S.A.~~ (~~“EuroGenet”~~Services) Limited, a ~~research~~ ~~laboratory~~Cyprus ~~located~~company inand ~~Athens,~~the ~~Greece,~~previous insole ~~order to explore future~~direct ~~prospects~~shareholder of ~~the~~Vardisto EPInvestments ~~Kit.~~Limited We, ~~estimated that the proprietary molecular diagnostics technology platform still required extensive research costs and experiments~~ for ~~the~~ ~~next two to three years before it reached a stage to attract~~ the ~~interest~~principal ~~of large~~sum ~~pharmaceutical and diagnostics companies. We also felt that the series~~ of ~~experiments~~$2,000,000, ~~required~~together towith ~~advance~~interest ~~the~~thereon ~~proprietary~~at ~~molecular~~a ~~diagnostic technologies~~rate ~~needed~~equal to be4% ~~conducted~~per ~~by highly qualified personnel devoting 100%~~annum ofcompounded ~~their~~annually, ~~efforts~~until to the ~~project.~~balance ~~The development~~ of ~~the~~principal ~~proprietary~~and ~~molecular diagnostics~~interest ~~technology~~outstanding ~~platform would probably require collaborations with~~is ~~international~~paid ~~university~~in ~~research centers equipped with highly trained personnel and appropriate instruments~~full.

InVardisto ~~early~~Investments 2006, our board of directors decided against devoting 100% of our attention and efforts on a single project, such as the molecular diagnostic technology platform, for the next two to three years, as it would involve too much risk and market exposure. Therefore, we decided to diversify our research activities.Limited

OnEffective ~~May~~January 2231, ~~2006~~2009, we ~~signed~~entered into a ~~joint~~share ~~development~~ exchange agreement (the “~~First~~Share ~~Joint~~Exchange ~~Development~~ Agreement”) with ~~Molecular~~Vardisto ~~Vision.~~Investments ~~Molecular Vision has~~Limited ~~developed~~(“Vardisto”), a ~~technology~~private ~~platform~~Cyprus ~~combining~~company. ~~microfluidics~~Pursuant ~~with~~to anthe ~~optical~~Share Exchange ~~detection~~Agreement, ~~system~~we ~~based~~agreed ~~on polymer light emitting diodes (commonly referred~~ to ~~as pLED)~~acquire ~~to deliver potentially affordable~~1,200 ~~intelligent~~shares ~~and readily portable point-~~of~~-care~~ ~~medical~~common ~~diagnostic~~stock ~~devices.~~of ~~The~~Vardisto, ~~technology platform combining~~which ~~microfluidics~~represents ~~and~~60% ~~pLED~~of isthe ~~known~~total asoutstanding ~~“BioLED~~share ~~Technology”~~capital ~~(see~~of ~~“Business~~Vardisto, –in ~~BioLED~~exchange ~~Technology”~~ for athe ~~detailed~~issuance ~~description~~ of ~~the~~9,000,000 ~~technology”).~~shares ~~Under~~of ~~the~~our ~~First Joint~~common ~~Development~~stock ~~Agreement,~~at wea ~~had~~price ~~the~~of ~~exclusive rights to develop and~~$0.40. ~~commercialize~~Such ~~the~~transaction ~~existing~~was ~~intellectual~~never ~~properties~~completed, ~~related~~since to the ~~BioLED Technology~~price ~~and~~of ~~had~~our ~~first~~common ~~refusal~~stock ~~rights~~ failed to ~~develop~~reach ~~any~~the ~~additional~~price ~~applications derived~~of ~~from Molecular Vision’s research and development results~~$0. ~~This agreement was replaced in its entirety by a subsequent agreement~~40.

OnAs ~~February~~a ~~27,~~result ~~2007,~~of werenegotiation ~~began~~of ~~negotiations to amend~~ the ~~First Joint~~initial ~~Development~~Share Exchange Agreement., Oneffective ~~March~~December 829, ~~2007~~2010, ~~Molecular~~we ~~Vision~~acquired 2,000 ~~successfully~~shares of Vardisto, ~~demonstrated~~representing ~~its~~100% ~~BioLED~~ownership ~~“Lab-on-~~of Vardisto in consideration for a~~-Chip~~ promissory note (“the Promissory Note”) ~~technology~~issued ~~using~~to ~~their~~Inter ~~patented~~Jura CY (Services) Limited, ~~organic~~a Cyprus ~~semi-conductor~~company ~~technology~~and inthe aprevious ~~high~~sole ~~sensitivity,~~direct ~~small~~shareholder ~~size,~~of ~~medical~~Vardisto ~~diagnostic~~Investments Limited ~~device~~, ~~that~~for ~~took~~the ~~place~~principal atsum ~~Imperial~~of ~~College~~$2,000,000, intogether ~~London,~~with ~~UK.~~interest ~~The~~thereon ~~device~~at a rate ~~demonstrated~~equal ~~its~~to ~~technological~~4% ~~capability~~per toannum ~~measure~~compounded ~~biomarkers~~annually, ~~with~~until ~~high sensitivity~~the balance of principal and interest atoutstanding ais ~~low~~paid ~~cost.~~in full,

We have the option and right at any time prior to this note being paid to convert any amount outstanding under this Promissory Note (including accrued interest) into shares of our common stock. The conversion will be deemed to occur at the average of the three prior day closing price (the “Average Price”) of our common stock on the OTCBB or any other stock exchange or trading market where our stock is listed for trading. We may deliver a notice of such conversion (the “Conversion Notice”) to Inter Jura CY (Services) Limited at any time before maturity of this note, together with a calculation of the amount converted, the Average Price and the number of common shares to be issued (the “Payment Shares”). Upon issuance and delivery of the Payment Shares to Inter Jura CY (Services) Limited, the amount of this Promissory Note indicated in the Conversion Notice will be deemed satisfied and fully paid.

Vardisto’s assets are its ownership interest in Halldale Ventures Limited (“Halldale”) and Irwingom Ventures Limited (“Irwingom”). Halldale and Irwingom are Cyprus private companies, in which Vardisto holds an 80% and 65% interest respectively. This majority ownership interest in the share capital of Halldale and Irwingom gives Vardisto a majority interest in the intellectual property and the business of Halldale and Irwingom.

As a result of the Share Exchange Agreement, (i) Vardisto became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of our company; (ii) Halldale Ventures Limited became an indirect 80% subsidiary of our company and (iii) Irwingom Ventures Limited became an indirect 65% subsidiary of our company.

Halldale Ventures Limited

Effective January 30, 2009, Halldale entered into an asset purchase agreement with Professor Margarita Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, whereby, Halldale agreed, among other things, to acquire the assets comprised mainly of intellectual properties and research materials from Ms. Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, in exchange for 20% of its issued and outstanding shares of its common stock.

The assets purchased by Halldale pursuant to the asset purchase agreement include research materials and experimental results from the use of a compound referred to as “compound X” as a hypolipidemic agent and development of a potential cholesterol-lowering agent, and main competitor of Statins in combination with essential oil derived from plants to treat effectively hypercholesterolemia.

- 3 -

Irwingom Ventures Limited

Effective January 30, 2009, Irwingom entered into an asset purchase agreement with Mr. Emmanuel Aslanis. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, Irwingom agreed, among other things, to acquire certain assets comprised mainly of intellectual property (Greek patent) and certain research materials from Mr. Emmanuel Aslanis, in exchange for 35% of its issued and outstanding shares of its common stock.

The assets purchased by Irwingom pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement include plans for the development of a system called IKAROS-1000, as a sophisticated and friendly to the environment fire extinguishing system, while its mechanics may also have applications in other sectors.

The IKAROS-1000 aspires to be a pioneering system which aims at changing worldwide the way of extinguishing fires more quickly and effectively. Apart from that, IKAROS-1000 may be used in agriculture, as crop dusting system, watering large rural areas, as well as neutralizing any size of oil spills at seas. The whole idea is based on information technology in conjunction with robotics and nanotechnology of materials.

The system consists of an air-balloon kind of pipeline, with a diameter up to one meter and a reachable length up to 10,000 meters according to the operational needs, and a water pump that can reach pressure up to 600 bars. With one valve each for intake and release helium, the balloon can be inflated or deflated and can be extended to reach the necessary height for each project. Every five meters the balloon is divided into autonomous departments. Each department has separate electronic plaque composed of GPS, IR camera and a 30cm diameter fan operated by compressed air with the ability to a 360º rotation around the axis, allowing the balloon to move right and left and making the whole system flexible in all directions. Under the fans passes a water pipeline with a 5cm diameter. The IKAROS-1000 can be fitted to a specially designed fire vehicle, for terrestrial operations, to an especially designed navigable vehicle for coastal and island operations as well as a tank-type vehicle for off-road and areas with difficult access.

Molecular Vision Limited

On May 22, 2006, we signed a joint development agreement (the “First Joint Development Agreement”) with Molecular Vision. Molecular Vision has developed a technology platform combining microfluidics with an optical detection system based on polymer light emitting diodes (commonly referred to as pLED) to deliver potentially affordable, intelligent and readily portable point-of-care medical diagnostic devices. The technology platform combining microfluidics and pLED is known as “BioLED Technology”. Under the First Joint Development Agreement, we had the exclusive rights to develop and commercialize the existing intellectual properties related to the BioLED Technology and had first refusal rights to develop any additional applications derived from Molecular Vision’s research and development results. This agreement was replaced in its entirety by a subsequent agreement.

On February 27, 2007, we began negotiations to amend the First Joint Development Agreement. On March 8, 2007, Molecular Vision, successfully demonstrated its BioLED “Lab-on-a-Chip” technology using their patented, organic semiconductor technology in a high sensitivity, small size, medical diagnostic device that took place at Imperial College in London, UK. The device demonstrated its technological capability to measure biomarkers with high sensitivity and at a low cost.

On April 17, 2007, we announced that Molecular Vision was successful in winning the £250,000 Royal Society Brian Mercer Award for Innovation. This is a prestigious award from the UK’s Royal Society to develop low-cost, high throughput, reel to reel, manufacturing techniques for plastic electronics.

On May 23, 2007, we signed a second joint development agreement (the “Second Joint Development Agreement”) with Molecular Vision, which replaced the First Joint Development Agreement. The Second Joint Development Agreement reduced our payments due to Molecular Vision by £550,000 to a total of £2,325,000. The Second Joint Development Agreement re-priced the exercise price of 2,000,000 options granted to Molecular Vision from $2.00 to $0.50. The Second Joint Development Agreement was replaced in its entirety by a subsequent agreement.

On October 11, 2007, we demonstrated the successful implementation of a fully functional, portable medical diagnostic demonstrator of Molecular Vision’s Lab-on-a-Chip technology. The demonstrator employs patented, organic semiconductor technology in a high sensitivity, handheld, medical diagnostic device. The successful presentation of the demonstrator device took place at Imperial College in London, UK.

- 4 -

On November 14, 2007, we entered into a letter of intent with Molecular Vision, whereby we would acquire, subject to certain payments, all of the intellectual property and assets of Molecular Vision and retain its founders, Professor Donald Bradley, Professor Andrew De Mello and Professor John De Mello and their technical team to continue to develop point-of-care devices and technology at Molecular Vision’s laboratory at Imperial College in London, UK. On February 1, 2008, we agreed to extend the date to acquire 100% of Molecular Visions to March 14, 2008. However, we did not close on this transaction.

- 2 -

On February 1, 2008, we completed an agreement with Molecular Vision, whereby we purchased 16,566 common shares of Molecular Vision for £549,991.20. The transaction gave us a 13.97% interest in the issued and outstanding shares of Molecular Vision at that time.

On August 19, 2008 we entered into an interim agreement and on November 14, 2008, we entered into a definitive agreement (collectively, the “New Molecular Agreements”), whereby Molecular Vision terminated the Second Joint Development Agreement and we increased our ownership position in Molecular Vision by virtue of receiving an additional 17,168 common shares of Molecular Vision and received a royalty of 0.5% of net sales value and a licensing fee of 5% on all diagnostic products or components falling within the claims of certain patents of Molecular Vision and a royalty of 0.3% of net sales value and a licensing fee of 3% on all other products of Molecular Vision.

As a result of the restructuring of our relationship with Molecular Vision, we will now seek other development opportunities in fields possibly related or complimentary to Molecular Vision’s technology.

On July 22, 2009, we purchased 19,426 preferred shares in Molecular Vision for $275,500.71 (£166,042). These preferred shares are convertible into common shares of Molecular Vision at a rate of one Class B common share for each preferred share held.

As of ~~April~~December 631, 2010, we hold 33,734 shares in the common ~~stock~~ stock and 19,426 shares in the preferred stock of Molecular Vision. We hold approximately 17.2% of the issued and outstanding shares of Molecular Vision.

~~Our~~Throughout ~~Business~~the 2010 year, Molecular Vision has continued to develop the BioLED™ optical detection platform. In the latest phase the company has progressed from a research organization and is now focusing on challenges associated with developing a novel technology into a commercial competitive offering.

~~Overview~~The Kidney prototype detecting creatinine and albumin in urine and the ratio of those two was developed and evaluated successfully as a proof of concept. Molecular Vision has moved on to testing blood in the device. While urine is the easiest to handle bodily fluid with no need of special treatment, blood is more complicated and requires special filters within the device in order to take a measurement. In order for this technology to offer competitive commercial edge, it requires the ability to measure blood directly into the device.

WeThe ~~are~~BioLED unit was integrated into a ~~development~~pre-prototype ~~stage~~instrument and ~~company~~a ~~focusing~~series onof ~~novel~~microfluidic ~~technology platforms~~chips ~~concerning~~were ~~the~~successfully ~~life~~measured ~~sciences~~using ~~sector.~~plasma samples Weof ~~intend~~known toMyoglobin ~~acquire~~concentrations a(Cardiac ~~subsidiary that~~Marker); ~~has~~early anresults ~~interest~~show expected inaccuracy ~~the~~and ~~intellectual~~precision. ~~property~~A ~~rights~~combined toCK-MB/Myoglobin achips ~~potential~~was designed ~~cholesterol-lowering~~and ~~agent~~this ~~that~~dual istest ~~currently~~delivered good correlation of serum concentrations in clinically ~~development.~~relevant levels.

~~Over~~The ~~the~~current ~~next~~focus 12is ~~months,~~to wedemonstrate ~~believe~~analytical ~~that~~performance ~~Molecular Vision will~~of ~~continue~~the totechnology ~~develop~~using a ~~prototype point~~tri-~~of-care~~panel ~~testing~~cardiac ~~device~~test ~~for~~combining ~~diabetes management~~myoglobin, CK-MB and Troponin ~~cardiovascular~~1 ~~testing.~~on Wea ~~intend~~quantitative tosingle-use ~~continue~~device. toMatrix ~~work~~development ~~toward finding more uses~~ for the ~~BioLED Technology in the market an intend to continue~~3 toassays ~~follow~~on the ~~development~~2-channel ofchips ~~the~~has ~~technology.~~made Weprogress, ~~intend~~allowing togood ~~focus~~dose ~~on completing~~response ~~the~~curves ~~acquisition~~for each of ~~Vardisto~~the ~~Investments Limited, as described below~~assays.

~~Share~~Dose ~~Exchange~~response ~~Agreement~~curves for both CK-MB and myoglobin have been run on the 3-channel chips. Signal levels are as expected.

~~Effective~~On ~~January~~February 311, ~~2009~~2011, weImperial ~~entered~~Innovation ~~into~~Business LLP, a leading ~~share~~technology, ~~exchange~~commercialization and investment company, increased its stake in Molecular Vision by committing a further investment of £750,000. Molecular Vision will issue as security loan notes, which are convertible into Class “A” Preferred Shares to Imperial Innovation Business LLP in two tranches as set out in the subscription agreement. (The first tranche being of £500,000 and the ~~“Share~~second ~~Exchange~~tranche ~~Agreement”)~~being ~~with~~of ~~Vardisto~~up ~~Investments~~to ~~Limited~~£250,000. The interest rate on the (convertible promissory note is at 10 percent per annum. The promissory notes are convertible into Class “~~Vardisto~~A”), Preferred Shares which are convertible into Class “B” ordinary shares. The promissory notes are secured by a ~~private~~debenture ~~Cyprus~~which establishes ~~company~~fixed and floating charges over the assets of Molecular Vision.

~~Pursuant~~In toour ~~the~~December ~~Share~~2010 ~~Exchange~~audited ~~Agreement,~~year weend ~~agreed~~financial ~~to acquire 600 shares of common stock of Vardisto~~statements, ~~which represents 60% of the total~~we ~~outstanding~~wrote-off ~~share~~our ~~capital~~investment ~~of Vardisto,~~ in ~~exchange~~Molecular ~~for~~Vision ~~the~~to ~~issuance~~a ofnominal ~~9,000,000 shares~~amount ofdue ~~our~~to ~~common~~minimal cash ~~stock.~~flow Asand atinability ~~April~~to 6,find ~~2010,~~suitable wepartners ~~have~~or ~~not~~investors ~~issued~~to ~~the~~inject ~~9,000,000~~additional ~~shares~~funds into ~~connection~~complete ~~with~~ the ~~acquisition~~development of ~~Vardisto~~our ~~and the transaction has not closed~~technology.

~~Vardisto’s~~- ~~main~~5 ~~asset is its interest in Halldale Ventures Limited (“Halldale”). Halldale is a private Cyprus company, which Vardisto holds an 80% interest.~~ -

-Industry ~~3 -~~Overview

~~Effective January 30, 2009,~~ Halldale ~~entered~~Ventures into an asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Maragrita Hadzopoulou-Cladaras. Pursurant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, Halldale agreed, among other things, to acquire certain assets comprised mainly of intellectual property and certain research materials from Ms. Hadzopoulou-Cladaras in exchange for 20% of its issued and outstanding shares of its common stock. Limited

~~The~~Coronary ~~assets~~heart ~~purchased~~disease by(“CHD”) ~~Halldale~~is ~~pursuant~~the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world. In the United States more than 500,000 deaths per year are attributed to CHD and the ~~Asset~~disease ~~Purchase~~costs more than ~~Agreement~~100 ~~include~~billion ~~research~~USDs ~~materials~~in medical expenses and ~~experimental~~lost ~~results~~income. ~~from~~Hypercholesterolemia is regarded as the ~~use~~major cause of aatherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. The ~~compound~~accumulation ~~referred~~of tolipids, ascholesterol ~~“compound~~and X”triglycerides, aswithin athe ~~hypolipidemic~~intimae ~~agent~~of arterial ~~and~~blood vessels is the principal etiologic factor in the development of CHD. Multiple evidences have established a ~~potential~~strong ~~cholesterol~~causal relationship between CHD and elevated LDL-~~lowering~~cholesterol ~~agent~~which is the major atherogenic lipoprotein. Importantly, reduction of serum cholesterol levels by diet or pharmacological intervention reduces the incidence of CHD. One of the most effective ways of reducing circulating cholesterol levels is to inhibit endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis in ~~combination~~the liver. This is primarily achieved with ~~essential~~Statins, ~~oil~~which ~~derived~~inhibit ~~from~~3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme ~~plants~~A (HMG-CoA) reductase and lower LDL-cholesterol effectively. HMG-CoA reductase catalyzes the rate limiting step of cholesterol biosynthesis and it is a prime target for pharmacological prevention of hypercholesterolemia. Statins have been the most widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. However, for many patients Statins do not reduce LDL-cholesterol to acceptable levels and a significant number of patients do not tolerate Statins well due to side effects. Therefore, we believe that there is a need for the development of new classes of drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

~~The~~Statins ~~Share~~(or ~~Exchange~~HMG-CoA ~~Agreement~~reductase isinhibitors) ~~subject~~are a class of drug used to lower cholesterol levels by inhibiting the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase, which plays a ~~number~~central role in the production of ~~closing~~cholesterol in the ~~conditions~~liver. ~~including~~Increased cholesterol levels have been associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and Statins are therefore used in the ~~following:~~prevention of these diseases. Randomized controlled trials have shown that they are most effective in those already suffering from cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention), but they are also advocated and used extensively in those without previous CVD but with elevated cholesterol levels and other risk factors (such as diabetes and high blood pressure) that increase a person’s risk.

~~(a)~~When ~~the~~it ~~representations~~comes ~~and~~to ~~warranties~~Halldale offor ~~both parties will be true, correct and complete on~~ the ~~closing~~further ~~date;~~development ~~(b) all covenants~~ and ~~obligations~~ usage of ~~the~~compound ~~parties~~X ~~will~~as bea ~~performed~~lowering-cholesterol ~~and~~drug, ~~complied~~we ~~with~~believe inthat ~~all~~compound ~~material~~X ~~respects;~~has ~~(c)~~the potential ~~all documents necessary or reasonably required~~ to ~~consummate the transaction will~~ be ~~executed~~developed ~~and~~into ~~delivered to the other party; (d) we will have received~~ a ~~certificate~~potent ~~from~~hypolipidemic ~~the~~drug ~~Secretary~~with ~~of Vardisto attaching~~ a ~~copy~~mechanism of action ~~Vardisto’s~~that ~~charter~~is ~~documents~~distinct ~~and~~from ~~a copy of~~ the ~~resolutions~~mechanism of ~~the~~action ~~board~~ of directors of Vardisto approving the transaction; (e) we will have received all duly executed copies of all third party consents and approvals contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement; (f) our common stock will continue to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board; and (g) there will be no material adverse change in VardistoStatins.

~~There~~Irwingom isVentures no assurance that the transactions completed under the Share Exchange Agreement will be completed as planned or at all. As of April 6, 2010, the transactions under the share exchange agreement had not been completed. Limited

OnWhen ~~October~~it 1,comes ~~2008,~~to wethe ~~signed~~IKAROS-1000 asystem, ~~two~~we ~~year~~believe ~~management~~that ~~and~~if it ~~operational~~is ~~services~~successfully ~~agreement~~developed ~~with~~as ~~Vardisto~~planned, ~~Investments~~its ~~Limited~~competitors, ~~which~~although ~~includes~~not direct, ~~rental~~would ofbe ~~office~~the ~~space,~~firefighting ~~reception~~helicopters and ~~secretarial~~airplanes ~~services,~~as atwell ~~$5,000~~as ~~per~~the ~~month~~manned ~~and~~firefighting ~~located~~vehicles atused ~~115~~to ~~Ag.~~combat ~~Paraskevis Street, Halandri, Greece~~fires.

~~BioLED~~Molecular ~~Technology~~Vision Limited

Medical Diagnostic Testing – Point-of-Care Diagnostic Devices

The multi-billion dollar point-of-care diagnostic market is set to benefit most from the BioLED technology. BioLED offers a compelling solution to point-of-care diagnostics. The stand-alone devices will generate quantitative lab-quality results at the point-of-care using only small amounts of bodily fluids such as blood and urine. The availability of such devices would directly address key objectives of health providers in the UK, Europe and the US, notably, reducing treatment time, improving quality of treatment, reducing inequality of treatment by extending facilities available to remote surgeries and improving ongoing care via home-based preventative and post-treatment monitoring of at-risk patients. Potential products include:

professional point-of-care devices (cartridge/reader configuration) for use in a physician’s office, clinics and hospitals;
single-use disposable diagnostic devices for home testing.

- 4 -

The current proof-of-concept projects have shown that both immunoassays and colorimetric assays can be successfully implemented on the platform.

We continue to have an interest in the development of the BioLED Technology. Terms such as “Lab-on-a-Chip” or “Point-of-Care Testing” describe the concept of the technology, which is to have specialized, light weight, readily portable and easy to use devices to perform complex biological tests at the site where they are most needed. Traditionally, most of the complex biological tests require specialized laboratories equipped with bulky, expensive equipment and highly trained personnel. The difficulties in creating portable diagnostic devices for point-of-care testing include the lack of suitable miniaturization, low-power consumption and optical detection systems.

- 6 -

By combining the microfluidic technology with the pLED/OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diodes), we believe that BioLED Technology once developed, will offer medical devices at the point-of-care level that will allow the quantitative and qualitative analysis of medical conditions with high sensitivity and functionality at low cost.

Microfluidics refers to fluid flow in a network of microchannels which can be integrated on disposable, low cost Lab-on-a-Chip cartridges, while the flow of liquids or gases is controlled through valves and switches. Microfluidics can automatically guide a test sample through the various stages of an assay, perform multiple functions including sample purification, mixing with analytes, labeling, reaction and separation of products. Microfluidics can also be designed to guide the processed test sample to the integrated detection component of a point-of-care testing device.

Low cost, organic semiconductor polymer Light Emitting Diodes (“pLED”) with tunable optical properties provide BioLED Technology with low-power consumption and optical detectable components in a point-of-care testing device. Under electrical excitation the polymer emits light via radiative combination of injected electrons and holes and therefore may be used as a light source. The same structure can then be used in reverse as a photodetector by illuminating the polymer in order to generate a measurable electrical current.

In a future point-of-care testing device based on the BioLED Technology, reagents of an assay will be mixed with the body fluid (blood, urine) through the microfluidic network. The resulting mixture will be excited by the integrated, battery driven pLED and the resulting light-signal will be detected by the integrated photodetector, which will generate an electrical readout.

A typical assay for disease “markers” comprises two steps. First, specific immobilized antibodies are used to capture the protein markers inside the detection zone. Secondly, fluorescently labeled detection antibodies specific to the protein marker are flowed over the detection zone. The detection antibodies bind to capture protein markers and unbound excess detection antibodies are rinsed away. The labeled antibodies can then be excited with ~~our~~ Molecular Vision’s pLED light sources and any emitted fluorescence is detected with ~~our~~Molecular Vision’s organic photodiodes. Without disease markers no detection antibodies are retained, resulting in zero fluorescence. This format is applicable to most protein based disease markers as long as suitable specific antibodies are available.

Market Potential

Following primary market research, a number of potential point-of-care diagnostic device applications were evaluated in terms of feasibility, market needs, generating revenue, market growth rate and competition. Among these, two disease areas were chosen to be the primary targets for BioLED device development. These point-of-care testing devices will enable on-the-spot quantitative and qualitative diagnosis from a few drops of blood, urine.

Diabetes Management (Kidney Health Markers):

The prevalence of diabetes for all age-groups worldwide was estimated to be 2.8% in 2000 and 4.4% in 2030. The total number of people with diabetes is projected to rise from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030 (Global Prevalence of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:1047-1053, 2004). Microalbuminuria, a well known diabetic nephropathy marker, is defined by increased urinary Human Serum Albumin excretion. The Albumin Blue 580 (AB 580) assay is based on a red emitting fluorophore with specific affinity to human serum albumin. Upon binding to the human serum albumin, the fluorescence efficiency of AB 580 increases by two orders of magnitude. AB 580 shows significant fluorescence only when human serum albumin is present. If diagnosed at an early stage, Microalbuminuria can be treated before its progression to the development of diabetic nephropathy (kidney failure). Approximately 25 – 30% of all diabetics develop evidence of nephropathy.

- 5 -

Cardiovascular Diseases (Cardiac Markers):

Cardiovascular diseases are responsible for the deaths of 17 million people worldwide each year, making them the developed world’s leading cause of death according to the World Health Organization. 32 million heart attacks and strokes per year demonstrate the need for the development of accurate, cost efficient and accessible diagnostics. Conventional diagnostic techniques, however, are costly, time consuming and of limited predictive potential. A smarter diagnostic approach is the in vitro measurement of various cardiac biomarkers of high preventive value, using a point-of-care device. The cardiac biomarker tests are based on a sandwich immunoassay format. The detectable species is the secondary antibody labeled with a fluorescent tag. The antibodies to be used are anti-myoglobin (Myoglobin), CK-MB antibody (creatine kinase), and anti-troponin I (Troponin I).

- 7 -

Compliance with Government Regulation

Halldale Ventures Limited

The Research Phases

Before a drug can be approved for sale to the public there is a set of clinical tests that must be performed. There is the Pre-Clinical Research Stage. Here the drug is synthesized and purified. Animal tests are performed, and institutional review boards assess the studies and make recommendations on how to proceed. If the recommendations are positive, then an application to the FDA occurs and clinical tests begin.

Phase 1 clinical studies in this phase represent the first time that an Introduction to New Drug (IND) is tested on humans either healthy volunteers or sometimes patients. The purpose of these studies is study in a clinical setting the metabolism, structure-reactivity relationships, mechanism of action, and side effects of the drug in humans. If possible, phase 1 studies are used to determine how effective the drug is. Phase 1 studies are usually conducted on 20 to 80 subjects.

The purpose of phase 2 clinical trials is to determine the efficacy of a drug to treat patients with a specific disease or condition, as well as learn about common short-term side effects or risks. These studies are conducted on a larger scale than phase 1 studies and typically involve several hundred patients.

Phase 3 clinical trials provide more information about the effects and safety of the drug and they allow scientists to extrapolate the results of clinical studies to the general population. Phase 3 studies generally involve several hundred to several thousand people.

There are several checks and balances in the process of clinical trials; among them is the use of institutional review boards (IRBs) and advisory committees. IRBs are designed to protect the rights and welfare of people participating in clinical trials both before and during the trials. IRB’s are made up of a group of at least five experts and lay people with diverse backgrounds to provide a complete review of clinical proceedings. The CDER uses advisory committees of various experts in order to obtain outside opinions and advice about a new drug. It also provides new information for a previously approved drug, as well as labeling information about a drug, guidelines for developing particular kinds of drugs, or data showing the adequate safety and effects of the drug.

The Application Process

The sponsor of a drug makes a formal application to the FDA to approve a new drug for use in the United States by submitting a new drug application (NDA). The NDA must include results and analyses from tests of the drug on both animals and humans, as well as a description of how the drug was manufactured. The NDA must provide enough detailed information for FDA reviewers to make several critical decisions. The result of the study must show whether the drug is safe and effective and whether its benefits outweigh its risks. It also decides whether the drug’s labeling information is appropriate, and whether the manufacturing methods used to obtain the drug are adequate for ensuring the purity and integrity of the drug.

The process of developing and testing a new drug is a lengthy one. The FDA estimates that it takes a little over 8 years to test a drug, including early laboratory and animal testing, before there is final approval for use by the general public. Various efforts, however, are underway to reduce the approval time.

Promising Experimental Drugs

Eight years is a long time to review a drug. Some patients, especially terminally ill patients, don’t particularly care if the drug meets high standards of safety. They don’t have the time. Taking any drug, in their view, is better than the alternative. So today’s policies also allow some investigational drugs even before they are approved for marketing.

- 8 -

These new policies called “expanded access” protocols include the Treatment Investigational New Drug (IND) application and the parallel track mechanism. Both tracks allow promising drugs, not yet approved for marketing, to be used in moderately unrestricted studies where the intent is not only to learn more about the drug, especially about its safety, but also to provide treatment for people with no real alternative. But these expanded access protocols still require clinical researchers to formally investigate the drug in well-controlled studies and to supply some evidence that the drug is likely to be helpful.

Final Actions

The FDA’s decision whether to approve a new drug for marketing comes down to answering two questions:

1. Do the results of well-controlled studies provide substantial evidence of its effectiveness?

2. Do the results show that the product is safe under the explicit conditions of use in the proposed labeling? Here “safe” is a relative term; it means that the benefits of the drug appear to outweigh its risks.

When the review is complete, the FDA writes to the applicant to say the drug is either approved for marketing, is “approvable,” provided minor changes are made, or is not approvable because of major problems. In the last case, the applicant can then amend or withdraw the NDA or ask for a hearing. Once its NDA is approved, a drug is on the market as soon as the firm gets its production and distribution systems going.

Status of Compound “X”

We have continued with pre-clinical studies involving small animals for the final determination of the action of the Compound “X” into lowering the cholesterol and the level of the tri-glycerides. We expect that the timeline of the conclusion of the pre-clinical stage will be in the next 12-18 months. At that time, Compound “X” should be ready to follow the clinical study phases as described above according to the FDA.

Status of IKAROS-1000

We do not have any approved procedures that need to be concluded for IKAROS-1000.

Molecular Vision Limited

We are aware that the production and marketing of medical testing devices are subject to the laws and regulations of governmental authorities in the United States and all other countries where the devices will be marketed. Specifically, in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), among other agencies, regulates new product approvals to establish safety and efficacy of these products. Governments in other countries have similar legal bodies handling the requirements for testing and marketing.

The Regulatory Process

The FDA in the United States and Medical Devices Directive in Europe are the official bodies that cover the regulatory requirements for medical devices. Medical devices are classified into Class I, II, and III. Regulatory control increases from Class I to Class III. The device classification regulation defines the regulatory requirements for a general device type. Most Class I devices are exempt from Pre-market Notification 510(k); most Class II devices require Pre-market Notification 510(k); and most Class III devices require Pre-market Approval.

Class I devices are defined as non-life sustaining. These products are the least complicated and their failure poses little risk.

Class II devices are more complicated and present more risk than Class I, though are also non-life sustaining. They are also subject to any specific performance standards.

Class III devices sustain or support life, so that their failure is life threatening.

- 9 -

The basic regulatory requirements that manufacturers of medical devices distributed in the U.S. must comply with are:

Pre-market Notification 510(k), unless exempt, or Pre-market Approval;
Establishment registration on form FDA-2891;
Medical Device Listing on form FDA-2892;
Quality System (QS) regulation;
Labeling requirements; and
Medical Device Reporting (MDR).

We believe that a devices that uses the BioLED Technology will be classified as Class I, as it will be used to diagnose rather than treat medical conditions. Additionally, medical devices that will use the BioLED Technology are non-invasive and the assays that will be used for testing are already existing in the market. BioLED Technology, once developed, will cover a great medical niche and it may undergo fast track review since there is no other such technology available in the market.

-Regardless 6of how the BioLED technology is regulated, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other Federal statutes and regulations govern or influence the research, testing, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, record-keeping, approval, distribution, use, reporting, advertising and promotion of Molecular Vision’s future products. Noncompliance with applicable requirements can result in civil penalties, recall, injunction or seizure of products, refusal of the government to approve or clear product approval applications or to allow Molecular Vision to enter into government supply contracts, withdrawal of previously approved applications and criminal prosecution.

Regardless of how the BioLED technology is regulated, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other Federal statutes and regulations govern or influence the research, testing, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, record-keeping, approval, distribution, use, reporting, advertising and promotion of our future products. Noncompliance with applicable requirements can result in civil penalties, recall, injunction or seizure of products, refusal of the government to approve or clear product approval applications or to allow us to enter into government supply contracts, withdrawal of previously approved applications and criminal prosecution.

Product Approval in the United States

The BioLED Technology is currently in the developmental stage and the process of seeking regulatory approval from the FDA has not begun. There can be no assurance that the BioLED Technology and potential products will ultimately receive regulatory approval.

We believe that BioLED Technology, if successfully developed, may be considered appropriate as part of a medical device and will be then subjected to the requirements of FDA for clinical testing to demonstrate safety and effectiveness prior to the approval.

Product Approval in Europe

If the BioLED Technology is successfully developed and regulatory approval of its use is sought in Europe, we believe that the BioLED Technology may be regulated in Europe as a Class I Sterile, Class IIb or Class III medical device, under the authority of the Medical Device Directives being implemented by European Union member countries. These classifications apply to medical laboratory equipment and supplies including, among other products, many devices that are used for the collection and processing of blood for patient therapy.

The applicable regulations vest the authority to permit affixing of the CE Mark with various notified bodies. These are private and state organizations which operate under license from the member states of the European Union to certify that appropriate quality assurance standards and compliance procedures are followed by developers and manufacturers of medical device products or, alternatively, that a manufactured medical product meets a more limited set of requirements. Notified bodies are also given the responsibility for determination of the appropriate standards to apply to a medical product. Receipt of permission to affix the CE Mark enables a company to sell a medical device or product in all European Union member countries. Other registration requirements may also need to be satisfied in certain countries. Molecular Vision has not received permission from a notified body to affix the CE Mark to the BioLED Technology, nor have they as yet requested such permission.

Status of Product

OnA ~~March 8, 2007, a~~ demonstrator device was presented at Imperial College in London, UK, using MVL'’s patented, organic semiconductor technology in a high sensitivity, small size, medical diagnostic device. The device demonstrated its technological capability to measure biomarkers with high sensitivity and at low cost.

OnMolecular ~~October~~Vision ~~11, 2007, we~~ demonstrated the successful implementation of a fully functional, portable medical diagnostic demonstrator of Molecular Vision’s Lab-on-a-Chip technology. The demonstrator employs patented, organic semiconductor technology in a high sensitivity, handheld, medical diagnostic device. The stand alone two-channel, battery-powered device, complete with digital display and self-referencing capability has demonstrated its capability to measure clinically relevant markers with high sensitivity and at low cost. In particular, the demonstrator device has been used successfully to measure creatinine in urine at physiologically significant concentrations. The results, obtained within seconds, were comparable to those obtained using a bench top spectrometer. The successful presentation of the demonstrator device took place at Imperial College in London, UK.

- 710 -

Throughout the year ended December 31, 2010, Molecular Vision has iscontinued ~~continuing~~ to develop the ~~prototype~~BioLED™ optical detection platform. In the latest ~~point-of-care~~phase ~~testing~~the ~~device~~company ~~for~~has ~~diabetes~~progressed ~~management~~from a research organization and ~~Cardiovascular~~is ~~testing~~now ~~and~~focusing ~~has~~on ~~not~~challenges ~~yet~~associated ~~begun~~with ~~the~~developing ~~regulatory~~a ~~approval~~novel ~~process~~technology into a commercial competitive offering.

The Kidney prototype detecting creatinine and albumin in urine and the ratio of those two was developed and evaluated successfully as proof of concept. While urine is the easiest to handle bodily fluid with no need of special treatment, blood is more complicated and requires special filters within the device in order to take a measurement. In order for this technology to offer competitive commercial edge, it requires the ability to measure blood directly into the device.

The BioLED unit was integrated into a pre-prototype instrument and a series of microfluidic chips were successfully measured using plasma samples of known Myoglobin concentrations (Cardiac Marker); early results show expected accuracy and precision. A combined CK-MB/Myoglobin chip was designed and this dual test delivered good correlation of serum concentrations in clinically relevant levels.

The current focus is to demonstrate analytical performance of the technology using a tri-panel cardiac test combining myoblobin, CK-MB and Troponin 1 on a quantitative single-use device.

Molecular Vision is searching for potential investors or partners to assist with the development of prototype point-of-care testing device for diabetes management and Cardiovascular testing and has not yet begun the regulatory approval process.

Dependence on One or a Few Major Customers

As we are a development stage company, we do not yet have any customers or customer contracts.

Employees and Consultants

~~Our~~We ~~company~~have ~~currently~~two ~~has~~part ~~two~~time ~~employment~~employees, ~~agreements~~who are our President and ~~one~~our ~~consulting~~Chief ~~agreement~~Technology ~~with~~Officer. anEffective ~~independent~~March ~~advisor~~31, 2011 both of their contracts were terminated. We are in the process of reviewing a new compensation package based on a combination of shares and fees. We have also engaged our Chief Financial Officer as a consultant.

Our employment agreement with our President, Mr. Platon Tzouvalis, dated April 1, 2007 was recently renewed and is for a term of three years ending March 31, 2013. Mr. Platon Tzouvalis has agreed to serve as our President and is obligated to perform his duties and responsibilities in good faith and on a best efforts basis. In consideration for his services, we pay him a monthly salary of $7,000. We also compensate Mr. Platon Tzouvalis for any expenses he incurs in carrying out his duties.

Our employment agreement with our Chief Technology Officer, Dr. Manos Topoglidis, dated April 1, 2007 was recently renewed and is for a term of three years ending March 31, 2013. Dr. Manos Topoglidis has agreed to serve as our Chief Technology Officer and is obligated to perform his duties and responsibilities in good faith and on a best efforts basis. In consideration for his services, we pay him a monthly salary of $4,500. We also compensate Dr. Manos Topoglidis for any expenses he incurs in carrying out his duties.

Our consulting agreement with our former President, Mr. Constantine Poulios, dated April 1, 2008 was recently renewed and is for a term of three years ending March 31, 2013. Mr. Constantine Poulios has agreed to serve as an outside independent advisor on all issues as our board of directors may need from time to time. Mr. Constantine Poulios has the obligation to serve the company in good faith and on a best efforts basis. In consideration for his services, we pay him a monthly fee of $10,000. We also compensate Mr. Constantine Poulios for any expenses he incurs in carrying out his duties. Further, in consideration of Mr. Constantine Poulios signing the original consulting agreement dated April 1, 2008, we re-priced 100,000 options exercisable at $2.50 to an exercise price of $0.50 and granted an additional 200,000 options at an exercise price of $0.50. The consulting agreement can be terminated as follows:

by Mr. Constantine Poulios upon a change of control of our company, upon which Mr. Constantine Poulios is entitled to the greater of the amount of compensation payable for the remaining term of the agreement and 12 months of fee payments;

by Mr. Constantine Poulios, upon which Mr. Constantine Poulios will undertake to perform the required tasks until a proper replacement is found and we have the right to terminate all options or benefits accrued under the agreement;

by us without cause, upon which Mr. Constantine Poulios is entitled to the amount of compensation payable for the remaining term of the agreement; and

by us with cause, upon which the agreement is terminated and no payment is made to Mr. Constantine Poulios.

Our Director and CFO, Mr. Ron Lizée has been with us since June of 2004 and is not on a contract. His professional accounting firm invoices us monthly at the same billable rate as other clients.

Reports to Security Holders

We file reports and other information with the SEC. This annual report on Form 10-K, historical information about our company and other information can be inspected and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC located at Room 1580, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of such materials, including copies of any portion of this annual report on Form 10-K, can be obtained from the Public Reference Room of the SEC at prescribed rates.

- 8 -

You can call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 to obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. Such materials may also be accessed electronically by means of the SEC’s home page on the Internet (http://www.sec.gov).

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Much of the information included in this report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements”. Such forward looking statements include any projections and estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein. Such estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements” involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements”.

Shares of our common stock are speculative, especially since we are in the development stage of our new business. We operate in a volatile sector of business that involves numerous risks and uncertainties. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Other risks and uncertainties, including those that we do not currently consider material, may impair our business. If any of the risks discussed below actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. This could cause the trading price of our securities to decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Prospective investors should consider carefully the risk factors set out below.

- 11 -

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

We have not earned any revenues since our incorporation and only have a limited operating history in our current business, which raise doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our company has a limited operating history in our current business and is in the development stage. We have not generated any revenues since our inception and we will, in all likelihood, continue to incur operating expenses without significant revenues until we successfully develop a compound referred to as “compound X” as a hypolipidemic agent and a potential cholesterol-lowering agent or develop a system called IKAROS-1000 as a sophisticated and friendly to the environment fire extinguishing system, or Molecular Vision successfully develops its BioLED Technology and commercializes its future point-of-care testing devices. Our primary source of funds has been the sale of our common stock. We cannot assure that we will be able to generate any significant revenues or income. These circumstances make us dependent on ~~additional~~ additional financial support until profitability is achieved.

Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future financing.

Since our inception, we have accumulated a deficit of $2730,~~570~~528,~~395~~065 as at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $27,570,395) and incurred a net loss ~~of $937,573 during~~ during the year ended December 31, 2010 of $2,957,670 (2009 - $937,573). These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the explanatory paragraph to our independent auditor’s report on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~ 2010, which are included in this annual report on Form 10-K. Although our consolidated financial statements raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, they do not include any adjustments relating to recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts or classifications of liabilities that might be necessary in the event our company cannot continue in existence.

Risks Related to our Business

The global financial crisis has had, and may continue to have, an impact on our business and financial condition.

The ongoing global financial crisis may also limit our ability to access the capital markets at a time when we would like, or need, to raise capital, which could have an impact on our ability to react to changing economic and business conditions. Accordingly, if the global financial crisis and current economic downturn continue or worsen, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

- 9 -

The Share Exchange Agreement with Vardisto may not complete and we may not obtain an interest in the development of the potential cholesterol-lowering agent.

The Share Exchange Agreement may not complete and we may not obtain an interest in the development of the potential cholesterol-lowering agent. Even if we do obtain an interest in the potential cholesterol-lowering agent, there is no assurance that it will ever become commercially viable. The development of life science technology is extremely risky and expensive. It is likely that we will never develop and sell a product that will make us profitable. If we never become profitable, we will go out of business and investors will lose all of the money they have invested in our company.

We need to raise additional financing to support the research and development of future business but we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us when needed. If we are unable to obtain additional financing to meet our needs, our operations may be adversely affected or terminated.

Our ability to develop our business is dependent upon our ability to raise significant additional financing when needed. Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including:

~~the~~investments ~~closing~~in ~~of the Share Exchange Transaction~~Vardisto;
any additional investments in ~~other~~Molecular ~~technologies~~Vision, orincluding ~~technology~~investments required ~~companies~~to maintain our ownership position; and
~~any additional~~ investments in ~~Molecular~~other ~~Vision,~~technologies ~~including~~or ~~investments required~~technology ~~to maintain our ownership position~~companies.

We have limited financial resources and to date, no cash flow from operations and we are dependent for funds on our ability to sell our common stock, primarily on a private placement basis. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on that basis in light of factors such as the market demand for our securities, the state of financial markets generally and other relevant factors. Any sale of our common stock in the future will result in dilution to existing stockholders. Furthermore, there is no assurance that we will not incur debt in the future, that we will have sufficient funds to repay our future indebtedness or that we will not default on our future debts, jeopardizing our business viability. Finally, we may not be able to borrow or raise additional capital in the future to meet our needs or to otherwise provide the capital necessary to conduct the development of our technology, which might result in the loss of some or all of your investment in our common stock.

~~Molecular~~Risks ~~Vision~~Related ~~may be subject~~ to ~~intellectual property litigation such as patent infringement claims, which could adversely affect~~ our ~~business.~~ Business

~~Other~~Substantial ~~patents~~Research ~~could~~on exist or could be filed which would prohibit or limit Molecular Vision’s ability to develop the BioLED Technology. In the event of an intellectual property dispute, we may be forced to litigate. Intellectual property litigation would divert attention away from developing the Bio LED Technology and marketing our ~~potential~~projects ~~products~~is ~~and~~still beneeded ~~very expensive.~~without Anany ~~adverse~~results ~~outcome could take our ability to develop or commercialize a potential product and could prevent us from becoming profitable.~~ guaranteed

~~Because~~Our ~~some~~projects ofinvolve ~~our~~substantial ~~officers~~research ~~and~~with ~~directors~~unpredictable results. ~~are~~There ~~located~~is ~~in non-U.S.~~a ~~jurisdictions,~~high ~~you~~risk ~~may~~that ~~have~~such nofurther ~~effective~~research ~~recourse~~produces ~~against~~results ~~the~~that ~~management~~make ~~for~~our ~~misconduct~~projects ~~and~~unrealistic ~~may~~or ~~not~~too bedifficult ~~able~~ to ~~enforce~~complete ~~judgment~~ and ~~civil liabilities~~that ~~against~~may impair our ~~officers,~~ability ~~directors,~~to ~~experts~~conduct ~~and~~business ~~agents~~operations as currently planned.

~~Most~~- of12 our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any U.S. state.-

-Loss 10of -the inventors could impair our ability to further develop the projects.

IfWe weexpect ~~are~~Dr. ~~deemed~~Margarita toHantzopoulou-Cladaras, bethe aninventor ~~investment~~for the ~~company~~“compound ~~under~~X”, and Mr. Emmanuel Aslanis, the ~~Investment~~ ~~Company~~inventor ~~Act~~for the IKAROS-1000 system, to continue working on their respective projects. If we ~~may~~lose beDr. Hantzopoulou-Cladaras ~~required~~and/or toMr. ~~institute~~Emmanuel ~~burdensome~~Aslanis, ~~compliance~~our business could suffer. ~~requirements~~ Our success is highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. If we were to lose our ~~activities~~inventors, we may beexperience ~~restricted~~difficulties in competing effectively, developing our technology and implementing our business strategies. We do not have key man life insurance in place for any of our key personnel.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”) contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which investment companies are permitted to conduct their business activities. If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our contracts would be voidable and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of and liquidate our business.

In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exemption, we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and that we do not own or acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. The SEC has adopted Rule 3a-1 that provides an exemption from registration as an investment company if a company meets both an asset and an income test and is not otherwise primarily engaged in an investment company business by, among other things, holding itself out to the public as such or by taking controlling interests in companies with a view to realizing profits through subsequent sales of these interests. A company satisfies the asset test of Rule 3a-1 if it has no more than 45% of the value of its total assets (adjusted to exclude U.S. Government securities and cash) in the form of securities other than interests in majority-owned subsidiaries and companies which it primarily and actively controls. A company satisfies the income test of Rule 3a-1 if it has derived no more than 45% of its net income for its last four fiscal quarters combined from securities other than interests in majority owned subsidiaries and primarily controlled companies.

Our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel will be an important factor in the success of our business and a failure to hire and retain key personnel may result in our inability to manage and implement our business plan.

Our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel will be an important factor in the success of our business. In addition, in order to manage growth effectively, we must implement management systems and continue to recruit and train new employees. We may not be able to attract and retain the necessary qualified personnel. If we are unable to retain or to hire qualified personnel as required, we may not be able to adequately manage and implement our business plan.

Molecular Vision or we may be subject to intellectual property litigation such as patent infringement claims, which could adversely affect our business.

Other patents could exist or could be filed which would prohibit or limit our ability to develop “compound X” or the IKAROS-1000 system, or Molecular Vision’s ability to develop the BioLED Technology. In the event of an intellectual property dispute, we may be forced to litigate. Intellectual property litigation would divert attention away from developing the Bio LED Technology and marketing our potential products and be very expensive. An adverse outcome could take our ability to develop or commercialize a potential product and could prevent us from becoming profitable.

Because some of our officers and directors are located in non-U.S. jurisdictions, you may have no effective recourse against the management for misconduct and may not be able to enforce judgment and civil liabilities against our officers, directors, experts and agents.

Most of our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any U.S. state.

Our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting were proven not effective, which may cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.

Our management evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and concluded that as of that date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures was due to a lack of knowledge regarding U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission by responsible people within our company.

InWe ~~addition,~~have ~~our~~not ~~management~~yet ~~evaluated~~remediated ~~our~~these ~~internal~~disclosure ~~control~~weaknesses ~~over~~and we ~~financial~~believe ~~reporting~~that asour ofdisclosure ~~December~~controls ~~31, 2009~~ and ~~concluded~~procedures ~~that~~continue ~~that~~to ~~there~~be ~~were~~ineffective. ~~material~~Until ~~weaknesses~~these inissues ~~our~~are ~~internal~~corrected, ~~control~~our ~~over~~ability ~~financial~~to ~~reporting~~report asquarterly ~~of that date~~ and ~~that our internal control over~~ annual financial ~~reporting~~results ~~was~~or ~~not~~other ~~effective~~information ~~as of~~required ~~that~~to ~~date.~~be Adisclosed ~~material~~on ~~weakness is~~ a ~~deficiency~~timely orand accurate abasis ~~combination~~may ofbe ~~control deficiencies~~adversely inaffected ~~internal~~and ~~control~~our ~~over~~ financial reporting ~~such that there is a~~may ~~reasonable~~continue ~~possibility~~to ~~that~~be aunreliable, ~~material~~which ~~misstatement~~could ofresult ~~our~~in ~~annual~~additional ormisinformation ~~interim~~being ~~financial~~disseminated ~~statements~~to ~~will~~the ~~not~~public. beInvestors ~~prevented~~relying orupon ~~detected~~this onmisinformation amay ~~timely basis. We~~make ~~intend~~an touninformed ~~remedy~~investment ~~these material weaknesses in the 2010 fiscal year~~decision.

We have not yet remediated these material weaknesses and we believe that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting continue to be ineffective. Until these issues are corrected, our ability to report quarterly and annual financial results or other information required to be disclosed on a timely and accurate basis may be adversely affected and our financial reporting may continue to be unreliable, which could result in additional misinformation being disseminated to the public. Investors relying upon this misinformation may make an uninformed investment decision.

- 11 -

Risks Related to our Common Shares

The recent weakening of economic conditions around the world could have harmful effects on our company. If these harmful effects cause us to cease our development of medical technologies, then our shareholders will likely lose their entire investment in our company.

The recent weakening of economic conditions in the U.S. and around the world could have harmful effects on our ability to raise money to fund our planned operations. If this happens, we would likely go out of business and our investors will lose their entire investment in our company.

We believe that recent decreases in value of the common shares of many companies worldwide will make selling shares of our common stock increasingly difficult. If we are not able to sell enough of our shares to meet our financial needs, we will have to consider borrowing the money we need. A tightening of credit conditions has also been experienced in the economy recently. Because of the recent credit crisis, it is possible that we would not be able to borrow adequate amounts to fund our operations on terms and at rates of interest we find acceptable and in the best interests of our company. If we are unable to obtain the amount of money that we need to fund our operations, then we will likely go out of business and investors will lose their entire investment in our company.

Because we do not intend to pay any dividends on our common stock, investors seeking dividend income or liquidity should not purchase shares of our common stock.

We have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception, and we do not anticipate paying any such dividends for the foreseeable future. Investors seeking dividend income or liquidity should not invest in our common stock.

- 13 -

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our ability to continue operations.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because a portion of our continued operations will be financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our operations. Such reductions may force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may have a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If our stock price declines, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital in the future, we may not be able to have the resources to continue our normal operations.

If we issue additional shares in the future, it will result in the dilution of our existing shareholders.

Our ~~certificate~~articles of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to to 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. Our board of directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares to acquire one or more businesses or to provide additional financing in the future. The issuance of any such shares will result in a reduction of the book value and market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuance will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all current shareholders. Further, such issuance may result in a change of control of our corporation.

- 12 -

Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

- 14 -

Our common stock is illiquid and the price of our common stock may be negatively impacted by factors which are unrelated to our operations.

Our common stock currently trades on a limited basis on the OTC ~~Bulletin Board~~Pink. Trading of our stock through the OTC ~~Bulletin~~Pink ~~Board~~ is frequently thin and highly volatile. There is no assurance that a sufficient market will develop in our stock, in which case it could be difficult for shareholders to sell their stock. The market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including market perception of our ability to achieve our planned growth, quarterly operating results of our competitors, trading volume in our common stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting our competitors or us. In addition, the stock market is subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Executive Offices and Resident Agent

Our registered office for mailing services is located at Fairfax House, 15 Fulwood Place, London UK WC1V 6AY, at cost of £705 per year.

- 13 -

Our registered office for service in the State of Nevada is located at Paracorp Incorporated, 318 N Carson St #208, Carson City, NV 89701.

On October 1, 2008, we signed a two year management and operational services agreement with Vardisto Investments Limited, which includes rental of office space, reception and secretarial services, at $5,000 per month and located at 115 Ag. Paraskevis Street, Halandri, Greece.

During 2008, we terminated a month-to-month management agreement for $10,000 per month with CASAD Sarl for office space and administration in Geneva, Switzerland.

In 2008, we terminated a rental agreement with PKL Ltd. for the rental of a flat in London for £488 per week.

We believe our current premises are adequate for our current operations and we do not anticipate that we will require any additional premises in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

PART II

Market information

Our common ~~shares~~stock ~~are~~is quoted on the OTC ~~Bulletin~~Pink ~~Board~~ under the ~~Symbol~~ symbol “AGNM”. ~~Our~~Until ~~stock~~May ~~was~~19, ~~originally~~2011, ~~approved~~our ~~for~~common ~~trading~~stock was quoted on the OTC ~~Bulletin~~ Bulletin Board, onbut ~~July~~effective 15May 20, ~~2003~~2011, ~~under~~our common stock has not been eligible for quotation on the ~~symbol~~OTC ~~“CWYV”~~Bulletin ~~and~~Board ~~was~~because ~~changed~~we failed to timely file our annual ~~“AGNM”~~report on ~~March~~Form 4,10-K ~~2004~~for inthe ~~connection~~year ended December 31, 2010 with athe ~~change~~Securities ofand Exchange ~~name~~Commission.

The following table reflects the high and low bid information for our common stock obtained from the OTC Bulletin Board for the periods indicated below and reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

~~The~~- ~~high~~15 ~~and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:~~ -

Quarter Ended		Bid High		Bid Low		~~Close~~
03/31/2010	$	0.35	$	0.11	$	0.24
03/31/2011	$	0.01	$	0.00
12/31/2009	$	0.20	$	0.09	$	0.12
12/31/2010	$	0.0586	$	0.00
09/30/2009	$	0.34	$	0.12	$	0.20
09/30/2010	$	0.095	$	0.05
06/30/2009	$	0.35	$	0.18	$	0.30
06/30/2010	$	0.20	$	0.08
03/31/2009	$	0.35	$	0.17	$	0.35
03/31/2010	$	0.35	$	0.11
12/31/2008	$	0.28	$	0.21	$	0.27
12/31/2009	$	0.20	$	0.09
09/30/2008	$	0.51	$	0.25	$	0.35
09/30/2009	$	0.34	$	0.12
06/30/2008	$	0.55	$	0.55	$	0.55
06/30/2009	$	0.35	$	0.18
03/31/2008	$	1.08	$	0.55	$	0.60
03/31/2009	$	0.35	$	0.17

-On 14March -9, 2012, the closing price for the common stock as reported on the OTC Pink was $0.099.

On March 31, 2010, the closing price for the common stock as reported by the quotation service operated by the OTC Bulletin Board was $0.24.

Transfer Agent

Our common shares are issued in registered form. The Pacific Stock Transfer Company of 500 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 240, Las Vegas NV 89119, Phone: (702) 361-3033, Fax: (702) 433-1979 is the registrar and transfer agent for our common shares.

Holders of Common Stock

As of ~~April~~March 712, ~~2010~~2012, there were ~~219~~approximately 226 registered holders of record of our common stock. As of such date, 2528,~~580~~858,481 common shares were issued and outstanding.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.

~~Recent~~Securities ~~Sales~~Authorized offor ~~Unregistered~~Issuance ~~Securities;~~Under ~~Use of Proceeds~~Equity ~~from~~Compensation ~~Registered Securities~~ Plans

~~During~~The ~~the~~following ~~fiscal~~table ~~year~~summarizes ~~ended~~certain ~~December~~information ~~31,~~regarding our ~~2009~~equity wecompensation ~~completed~~plan ~~the following~~as ~~sales~~ of ~~unregistered~~December ~~securities~~31, 2010:

On February 6, 2009, we issued 625,000 units to offshore subscribers pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 at price of $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $250,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two years. We paid a commission of $25,000 on this placement.

			Number of securities
			remaining available for
			future issuance under
	Number of securities to	Weighted-average	equity compensation
	be issued upon exercise	exercise price of	plans (excluding
	of outstanding options,	outstanding options,	securities reflected in
Plan category	warrants and rights	warrants and rights	column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	2,600,000	$0.71	Nil
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	Nil	Nil	Nil
Total	2,600,000	$0.71	Nil

OnIn ~~February 6~~May, ~~2009~~2005, we ~~issued~~adopted ~~66,250~~a ~~units~~stock tooption ~~offshore~~plan which provides for ~~subscribers~~the ~~pursuant~~granting of stock options to ~~Regulation~~selected Sdirectors, officers, employees or consultants in an aggregate amount of ~~the~~up ~~Securities~~to ~~Act~~2,600,000 common shares of ~~1933~~our company and, in ~~settlement~~ any case, the number of ashares ~~subscription~~to ~~receivable~~be issued to any one individual pursuant to the exercise of ~~$26,500~~options asmust atnot ~~December~~exceed ~~31,~~10% ~~2008.~~of ~~Each~~the ~~unit~~issued ~~consisted~~and outstanding share capital. The grant of ~~one~~stock ~~share~~options, ~~purchase~~exercise ~~warrant~~prices ~~exercisable~~and terms atare ~~$0.75~~determined ~~for~~by aour ~~period~~board of ~~two years~~directors.

On- May 15, 2009, we issued 525,000 units to offshore subscribers pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 at price of $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $210,000. Each unit consisted of one share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two years. We paid a commission of $16~~,000~~ ~~on this placement.~~-

OnRecent ~~September~~Sales ~~16, 2009, we issued 165,000 units to offshore subscribers pursuant to Regulation S~~ of ~~the~~Unregistered Securities Act of 1933 at price of $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $66,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two years. We paid a commission of $5,900 on this placement.

OnExcept ~~September~~as ~~16,~~disclosed ~~2009~~below, wesince ~~issued~~the ~~105,000~~beginning ~~units~~of tothe ~~offshore~~fiscal ~~subscribers~~year ~~pursuant~~ended toDecember ~~Regulation~~31, S2010, ofwe ~~the~~have ~~Securities~~not ~~Act~~sold ofany ~~1933~~equity atsecurities ~~price~~that ofwere ~~$0.40~~not ~~per~~registered ~~unit~~under ~~for~~the ~~total~~Securities ~~proceeds~~Act of ~~$42,000.~~1933 ~~Each~~that ~~unit~~were ~~consists~~not ~~of one common~~previously ~~share~~reported ~~and~~in ~~one~~a ~~common~~quarterly ~~share~~report ~~purchase~~on ~~warrant~~Form ~~exercisable~~10-Q ator ~~$0.75~~in ~~for~~ a ~~period~~current ~~of two~~report ~~years. The Company paid a commission of $4,200~~ on ~~this placement~~Form 8-K.

On ~~September~~April 3015, ~~2009~~2010, we issued ~~137~~25,~~500~~000 units ~~to offshore subscribers pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933~~ at ~~price of~~ $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $5510,000. Each unit consists of one ~~common~~ share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. We ~~paid~~issued these aunits ~~commission~~to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of ~~$5,500~~the onSecurities Act ~~this~~of ~~placement~~1933.

-On 15May -14, 2010, we issued 175,000 units at $0.20 per unit for total proceeds of $35,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. We issued 50,000 of these units to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 and 125,000 of these units to a U.S. person pursuant to Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933.

On ~~October~~August 299, ~~2009~~2010, we issued 50985,000 ~~units~~shares toat ~~offshore subscribers~~a ~~pursuant~~fair tovalue ~~Regulation S~~ of ~~the Securities Act of 1933 at price of~~ $0.4010 per ~~unit~~share for a total ~~proceeds~~ of $2098,~~000.~~500 ~~Each~~to ~~unit~~nine ~~consists~~(9) ofdifferent ~~one~~consultants ~~common~~of the ~~share~~company ~~and~~for ~~one~~in ~~common~~respect ~~share~~of ~~purchase~~consulting ~~warrant~~services ~~exercisable at $0~~rendered.75 ~~for~~These aconsultants ~~period of~~were ~~two~~all ~~years~~offshore residents. We ~~paid~~issued athese ~~commission~~shares pursuant to Regulation S of ~~$2,000~~the Securities onAct ~~this~~of ~~placement~~1933.

On August 9, 2010, we issued 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. We paid a commission of 10,000 shares. We issued these units to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 9, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of 10% totaling $1,000 cash. We issued these shares to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 24, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $1,000 on this placement. We issued these shares to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On September 22, 2010, we issued 102,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,200. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. We paid a commission of $1,000 on this placement. We issued these units to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On October 13, 2010, we issued 12,500 shares at $0.40 per share for commissions. We issued these shares to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On November 3, 2010, we issued 146,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $14,600. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. We paid a commission of $1,500 on this placement. We issued these units to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On November 11, 2010, we issued 447,500 fully vested common shares at a fair value of $0.07 based on quoted market price for a total of $31,325 for consulting services rendered to our company. We issued these shares to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On February 15, 2011, we issued 75,000 shares at a value of $0.10 per share for a total of $7,500 for services. We issued these shares to an offshore subscriber pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

During May 2011, we received $70,000 for the sale of 700,000 units at $0.10 per unit from two (2) U.S. investors. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of 2 years. We issued these units pursuant to Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933.

- 17 -

During June 2011, we received $30,000 for the sale of 300,000 units at $0.10 per unit from two (2) offshore investors. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. We issued these units pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

During October 2011, we received $20,000 for the sale of 200,000 units at $0.10 per unit from one offshore investor. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years . We issued these units pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010.

ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation provides a narrative about our financial performance and condition that should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in this annual report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward looking statements reflecting our current expectations and estimates and assumptions about events and trends that may affect our future operating results or financial position. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the sections of this Form 10-K titled “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.

~~Plan of Operation~~ Overview

~~Until~~We ~~August~~are ~~19,~~a ~~2008,~~development westage ~~had~~company ~~been~~that ~~operating~~focuses ~~pursuant~~on ~~to a~~investing ~~development~~and ~~agreement~~commercializing ~~with~~novel ~~Molecular~~technology ~~Vision,~~platforms ~~whereby~~concerning ~~we funded~~ the ~~development~~life sciences ofsector. ~~the~~We ~~point-of-care~~intend ~~device~~to offocus ~~Molecular~~and ~~Vision~~devote inresources ~~return~~and ~~for~~time aon ~~license~~our torecent ~~commercialize~~acquisition ~~and~~of ~~sell~~Vardisto ~~the~~Investments ~~device~~Limited. OnIn ~~August 19~~addition, ~~2008,~~over wethe ~~changed~~next ~~our~~12 ~~relationship~~months, ~~with~~we believe that Molecular Vision bywill ~~entering~~continue ~~into~~to ansearch ~~interim~~for ~~agreement, and a~~suitable ~~subsequent~~partners ~~agreement~~or oninvestors ~~November~~to ~~13,~~finalize ~~2008,~~the ~~whereby,~~development weof ~~terminated~~a ~~our~~prototype ~~previous~~point-of-care ~~development~~testing ~~agreement~~device ~~in exchange~~ for adiabetes ~~royalty~~management onand ~~product~~cardiovascular ~~sales~~testing. orWe ~~license~~intend ~~fees~~to ~~received~~continue byto ~~Molecular~~work ~~Vision~~toward ~~for~~finding ~~products~~investors orand ~~licenses~~more ~~based~~uses onfor ~~Molecular~~the BioLED ~~Vision’s~~Technology ~~suite~~in ofthe ~~patents,~~market and weintend ~~received~~to ~~17,168~~continue ~~additional~~to ~~common~~follow ~~shares~~the development of ~~Molecular~~ ~~Vision. These agreements are described further under~~ the ~~heading~~ ~~“Business – Corporate History”~~technology.

Previously, we were engaged solely in the business of the development and commercialization of the BioLED Technology, which combines microfluidics and polymer Light Emitting Diodes (“pLED”) for use in future point-of-care diagnostic devices, under various joint development agreement with Molecular Vision Limited (“Molecular Vision”). Molecular Vision owns the BioLED technology and we had the right to develop and commercialize it in exchange for a royalty. On ~~January~~August 3119, ~~2009~~2008, we entered into a ~~share~~new ~~exchange~~ agreement with Molecular Vision. Upon the closing of the new agreement with ~~Vardisto~~Molecular Vision, ~~whereby~~our wejoint development ~~agreed~~agreement towas ~~acquire~~cancelled ~~600~~in exchange for 25% of the issued and outstanding shares of ~~common~~Molecular ~~stock~~Vision. As a result of ~~Vardisto~~ this new arrangement, ~~representing~~we have ~~60%~~been much less involved with the development of ~~their~~the ~~total~~BioLED ~~outstanding~~technology ~~share~~than we ~~capital~~had been in ~~exchange~~the past and we have focused instead on acquiring an interest in ~~for~~another ~~the~~technology ~~issuance~~through obtaining 100% of ~~9,000,000~~the ~~shares~~issued and outstanding shares of ~~our~~Vardisto ~~common~~Investments ~~stock~~Limited (“Vardisto”). ~~The~~However, ~~share~~we ~~exchange~~are still interested ~~agreement~~in isthe ~~conditional~~BioLED ~~upon~~technology ~~certain~~and ~~events~~intend ~~occurring~~to ~~and~~continue ~~there~~to iswork notoward ~~assurance~~finding potential ~~that~~investors ~~the~~and/or ~~share~~partners ~~exchange~~interested ~~agreement~~in ~~will~~developing ~~close~~this technology in the market. ~~The~~In ~~share~~July ~~exchange~~2009, ~~agreement~~we ~~and~~purchased 19,426 preferred shares of Molecular Vision ~~Vardisto~~for $275,000 (£166.042) . These preferred shares are ~~described~~convertible ~~under~~into Class B common shares of Molecular Vision at the ~~heading~~rate ~~“Business~~of –one ~~Our~~Class ~~Business~~B –common ~~Vardisto”.~~share for each preferred share held. As atof ~~April~~December 631, 2010, we ~~have~~hold ~~not~~33,734 ~~issued~~shares in the common 9stock and 19,~~000,000~~426 ~~share~~shares in ~~connection~~the ~~with~~preferred stock of Molecular Vision, which ~~the~~is ~~acquisition~~approximately 17.2% of ~~Vardisto~~the issued and outstanding shares of Molecular Vision. In our December 31, 2010 audited financial statements, we wrote-down our investment in Molecular Vision to a nominal amount. This was mainly due to the minimal ~~transaction~~cash ~~has~~flow ~~not~~available ~~closed~~to continue with the development costs. However, we continue to search for an investor or partner to assist with the costs of development.

~~Over~~On ~~the~~December ~~next~~29, ~~12 months~~2010, we ~~will~~completed ~~work~~the onacquisition ~~closing~~of 100% of the total outstanding share ~~exchange~~ ~~agreement~~capital ~~with~~of Vardisto Investments Limited. ~~Further~~In consideration for the total shares outstanding, we ~~intend~~issued a promissory note to Inter ~~work~~Jura ~~with~~CY ~~Molecular~~(Services) Limited, a Cyprus company and the previous sole ~~Vision~~direct shareholder of Vardisto Investments Limited , for the principal sum of $2,000,000, together with interest thereon at a rate equal to ~~develop~~4% ~~and~~per ~~commercialize~~annum compounded annually, until the ~~BioLED~~balance ~~Technology~~of principal and interest outstanding is paid in full.

- 1618 -

Halldale’s assets include research materials and experimental results from the use of a compound referred to as “compound X” as a hypolipidemic agent and development of a potential cholesterol-lowering agent, and main competitor of Statins in combination with essential oil derived from plants to treat effectively hypercholesterolemia.

Irwingom’s assets include plans for the development of a system called IKAROS-1000, as a sophisticated and friendly to the environment fire extinguishing system, while its mechanics may also have applications in other sectors.

Cash Requirements

We have not generated any revenues and our operating activities have resulted in a loss of $~~937~~2,~~573~~965,670 for the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~ 2010 (~~2008~~2009: loss of $3937,~~022,005~~ 573). This negative cash flow is attributable to our ~~operating~~ operating expenses, including but not limited to, ~~general~~a ~~and~~write-down ~~administration~~of ~~and~~our ~~the~~investment ~~payment~~in Molecular Vision of ~~our~~$827,400, ~~audit~~and ~~fees~~recording as research and ~~legal~~development expense ~~fees.~~a Wesubstantial ~~anticipate~~amount ~~that~~of our ~~expenses~~acquisition ~~will~~in Vardisto Investment in the ~~increase~~amount asof we$1,349,225, ~~intend~~general toand ~~focus~~administration onand the ~~development~~payment of our ~~new~~audit fees ~~project~~and ~~with Vardisto~~legal fees. We estimate our expenses in the next 12 months will be ~~approximately~~ approximately $1450,~~800,~~000, generally falling in four major categories: research and development, general and administrative expenses, investor relations and professional fees.

We estimate our operating expenses and working capital requirements for the next 12 months to be as follows:

Expense		Amount
Research & Development	$	~~500~~150,000
General & Administrative	$	~~600~~100,000
Investor Relations	$	~~400~~50,000
Professional fees	$	~~300~~150,000
	$	1450,~~800,~~000

Research & Development expenses are expected to include our contributions to the research and development of the potential cholesterol-lowering agent that is currently in development by the subsidiary of Vardisto. ~~If we do not acquire Vardisto, then we intend to seek out and acquire another, as yet unknown, technology and to spend approximately this amount on its research and development.~~

General & Administrative ~~will~~expenses ~~include~~are ~~office~~expected ~~rent,~~to include ~~utilities~~travel, ~~communication~~transfer agents, office ~~equipment~~rent, ~~and~~office supplies, banking fees, ~~insurance,~~ corporate materials, accounting and temporary office assistance.

~~Investor~~- ~~Relations~~19 ~~will include the costs of paying for investor relations representatives, press releases, advertising, and travel expenses related to promoting the company.~~ -

~~Professional~~Investor ~~fees~~Relations ~~will~~expenses ~~include~~are ~~all~~expected ~~payments~~ to ~~our~~include ~~outsourced~~the costs ~~attorney~~of paying for investor relations representatives, press releases, advertising, and ~~independent~~travel ~~auditor~~expenses related to promoting the company.

AsProfessional offees ~~December~~are ~~31,~~expected ~~2009, we had approximately $4,303 in cash. We do not have enough funds~~ to ~~pay~~include ~~for~~all ~~our~~payments ~~estimated operating expenses for the next 12 months and require additional financing~~ to ~~continue~~ our ~~business. We~~ ~~anticipate~~outsourced ~~that we will have to address the cash shortfall through additional equity financings in the future. We can offer no assurance~~attorney, ~~however,~~accountant ~~that such financings will be available on terms acceptable to our company. The recent weakening of economic conditions in the U.S.~~ and ~~around~~independent ~~the world could have harmful effects on our ability to raise money to fund our planned operations~~auditor.

WeAs ~~believe that recent decreases in value~~ of ~~the~~December ~~common~~31, ~~shares of~~2010, ~~many companies worldwide will make selling shares of our common stock increasingly difficult. If~~ we ~~are~~had ~~not~~approximately ~~able to sell enough of our shares to meet our financial needs~~$6,615 wein ~~will have to consider borrowing the money we need~~cash. A ~~tightening~~We ofdo ~~credit conditions has also been experienced in the economy recently. Because of the recent credit crisis, it is possible that we would~~ not be ~~able~~have toenough ~~borrow~~funds ~~adequate amounts~~ to ~~fund~~pay for our ~~operations~~estimated onoperating ~~terms~~expenses ~~and~~for ~~at rates~~the ofnext ~~interest~~12 wemonths ~~find acceptable~~ and inrequire ~~our~~additional ~~the~~financing ~~best interests. If we are unable~~ to ~~obtain~~continue ~~the amount of money that we need to fund~~ our ~~operations, then we will likely go out of~~ business ~~and investors will lose their entire investment in our company~~.

We doanticipate ~~not~~that ~~expect~~we ~~that~~will ~~the~~have ~~difficult~~to ~~economic~~address ~~conditions~~the ~~are~~cash shortfall ~~likely~~through toadditional ~~improve~~equity ~~significantly~~financings in the ~~near~~ future. ~~Further~~We ~~deterioration~~can ofoffer ~~the~~no assurance, ~~economy~~however, ~~and~~that ~~even~~such ~~consumer~~financings ~~fear~~will ~~that~~be ~~the~~available ~~economy~~on ~~will~~terms ~~deteriorate~~acceptable ~~further~~to ~~could~~our ~~intensify~~company. ~~the~~If ~~adverse~~we ~~effects~~are ofable ~~these~~to ~~difficult~~raise ~~market~~additional ~~conditions~~financing by issuing equity securities, our existing stockholders’ ownership will be diluted.

-If 17we -are not able to sell enough of our shares to meet our financial needs, we will have to consider borrowing the money we need. It is possible that we would not be able to borrow adequate amounts to fund our operations on terms and at rates of interest we find acceptable and in our best interests. Obtaining commercial or other loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to delay or scale down some or all of our marketing, business development and product development activities or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.

Purchase of Significant Equipment

We do not intend to purchase any significant equipment.

Personnel Plan

We currently have two executive officers and one consultant, which ~~are~~were engaged pursuant to consulting agreements. As at March 31, 2011 and subsequent to our year end, we have terminated these agreements.

General Administration

We anticipate spending approximately $~~600~~100,000 on general and administration costs in the next 12 months. These costs are expected to consist primarily of travel, office, rent and consulting fees.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our financial condition for the years ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 and the changes between those periods for the respective items are summarized as follows:

Working Capital

		December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
		December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
Current Assets	$	196,~~303~~615		$	3919,~~662~~303
Current Liabilities		1,~~380~~876,~~671~~404			~~906~~1,~~101~~380,671
Working Capital (deficit)	$	(1,~~361~~869,~~368~~789	)	$	(~~866~~1,~~439~~361,368	)

The increase in our working capital deficit of $~~499~~508,~~021~~421 was primarily due to an increase of our accounts payables ~~and~~of ~~from~~$403,584, an increase in the US$ carrying value of our convertible promissory notes payable. of $32,391 and increase of loans payable of $59,758.

On February 14, 2011, subsequent to our December 31, 2010 year end, we entered into a debt agreement with Asher Enterprises, Inc. in exchange for $53,000 in cash financing maturing on November 16, 2011. The convertible note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum to maturity and 22% thereafter. The note is convertible at 61% of the closing price of the common shares on the day prior to the conversion date.

- 20 -

On April 18, 2011, we received a demand letter with respect to a convertible promissory note dated February 14, 2011 issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc. in the principal amount of $53,000 bearing a per annum interest rate of 8%. The letter stated that the convertible promissory note provides that we would be in default if we fail to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on this, the letter stated that we were in default under the convertible promissory note and demanded the immediate payment as provided in the convertible promissory note of $79,500 together with default interest as provided in the convertible promissory note. The letter stated that Asher Enterprises, Inc. would consider waiving this default, provided that we immediately become current in our filing obligations. Asher Enterprises, Inc. agreed to postpone the demand for payment, as long as we provided them with regular updates on our status of our reporting requirements.

Cash Flows

		Year Ended			Year Ended
		December 31,			December 31,
		2009			2008
		2010			2009
Net cash used in Operating Activities	$	(454,998	)	$	(1,307,390	)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	$	(167,724	)	$	(454,998	)
Net cash used in Investing Activities		(289,643	)		(947,845	)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		18,978			(289,643	)
Net cash provided by Financing Activities		726,900			1,933,584
Net cash Provided by Financing Activities		151,058			726,900
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents During the Period	$	~~(17~~2,~~741~~312	)	$	(~~321~~17,~~651~~741	)

Cash Used In Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 we used net cash in operating activities in the amount of $~~454~~167,~~998~~724 primarily towards general and administrative expenses as well as a net change in ~~prepaid~~accounts ~~expenses~~payable and accrued liabilities of $2403,~~618~~795 net change in shares issued for consulting and management fees of $129,825, write-down of Molecular Vision of $827,400, expense of research and adevelopment ~~net~~of ~~change~~$1,349,225, stock-based compensation of $35,352, reduction in ~~accounts~~unrealized ~~payable~~foreign exchange of $29,349 and ~~accrued~~changes ~~liabilities~~in prepaid expenses of $~~210~~15,~~184~~000.

-Cash 18from -Investing Activities

~~Cash~~During ~~Used~~the Inyear ~~Investing~~ended ~~Activities~~December 31, 2010, cash provided by investing activities were primarily from cash acquired in asset acquisition of $4,836 and deposits received in the amount of $14,142.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we acquired 19,426 additional shares in Molecular Vision to maintain our 17.2% ownership for $275,501 and advanced a deposit of $14,142 for net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 of $289,643.

Cash from Financing Activities

We received net cash of $151,058 from financing activities during the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010. Net cash generated by financing activities is attributable to cash received from common share issuances totaling $~~584~~91,~~400~~300, and from the ~~issuance~~loan ofadvances ~~convertible notes~~ totaling $~~150~~59,~~000 less a financing fee of $7,500 for net cash from financing activities totaling $726,900~~758.

Results of Operations

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 which are included in this annual report.

Revenue

We have not earned any revenues since our inception and we do not anticipate earning revenues until such time as we have begun commercial production or royalties from our investment with Molecular Vision. or Vardisto.

~~Income~~- ~~/Expenses~~21 -

~~Our income /expenses for the 12 months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:~~Expenses

	Year Ended		Year Ended
	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
Accounting and audit fees	156,248		187,481
Bank charges	1,981		4,052
Change in fair value of derivative liability	(169,452	)	-
Consulting fees	307,437		759,164
Interest, fees and accretion on notes payable	121,152		506,477
Interest income	(10	)	(202	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	101,806		(7,581	)
Legal fees	82,961		89,614
Management fees	11,647		605,681
Office and miscellaneous	3,717		37,370
Public relations and donation	7,600		5,102
Rent	61,127		59,538
Research and development	-		648,407
Transfer agent and filing fees	7,050		6,363
Travel	4,979		120,539
Write-down of investment in Molecular Vision	239,330		-
	(937,573	)	(3,022,005	)

Our expenses for the 12 months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

Income /expenses for the 12 months ended December 31, 2009 decreased by $2,084,432 compared to the same period in 2008 largely due to a decrease in consulting fees, a decrease in management fees (primarily resulting from a reduction of stock-based compensation) , a decrease of Research and Development resulting from the change in our relationship with Molecular Vision in 2008, decrease in travel, and a decrease in interest, fees and accretion on notes payable.

	Year Ended		Year Ended
	December 31, 2010		December 31, 2009
Accounting and audit fees	171,483		156,248
Bank charges	1,304		1,981
Change in fair value of derivative liability	-		(169,452	)
Consulting fees	468,176		307,437
Interest, fees and accretion on notes payable	61,010		121,152
Interest income	-		(10	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	29,157		101,806
Legal fees	23,516		82,961
Management fees	-		11,647
Office and miscellaneous	2,279		3,717
Investor relations	14,924		7,600
Rent	1,907		61,127
Transfer agent and filing fees	7,289		7,050
Travel	-		4,979
Write-down of investment in Molecular Vision	827,400		239,330
In Process research and development	1,349,225		-
	(2,957,670	)	(937,573	)

-Expenses 19for the 12 months ended December 31, 2010 increased by $2,020,097 compared to the same period in 2009 largely due to an increase of in process research and development charges of $1,349,225, an increase in the write-down of investment in Molecular Vision of $588,070, an increase in consulting fees of $160,739 and an increase in audit and accounting fees of $15,235.

~~Accounting and~~ Audit Fees and accounting fees

Our accounting and audit fees ~~decreased~~increased by $3115,~~233~~235 in the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 due to aan ~~decrease~~increase in audit fees of $35,179 resulting from increased complex GAAP matters and a decrease in accounting fees of $19,944.

Change in fair value of the derivative liability

This amount ~~increased~~decreased by $169,452 for the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 as ~~compared~~ the ~~balance~~calculation of ~~$Nil recorded in~~ the ~~year~~fair ~~ended~~value ~~December~~of ~~31, 2008. The reason for~~ the ~~difference~~embedded ~~was that we were required to bifurcate the~~derivative ~~conversion~~liability ~~feature~~in on our convertible promissory notes inwas ~~accordance~~$Nil toat ~~comply with US GAAP. Moreover, once calculated, these liabilities are re-measured to their fair value~~ each ~~reporting period which resulted in a gain~~ of ~~$169,452 for the year ended~~ December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Consulting Fees

The consulting fees we paid ~~decreased~~increased in the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 by $~~451~~160,~~727~~739 compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009. This was the result of us ~~terminating~~requesting ~~the~~additional services offrom ~~two~~ consultants during the ~~2008~~ 2010 year.

~~Interest~~- on22 ~~Notes Payable~~ -

~~The interest we incurred on notes payable decreased by $417~~Interest,~~198 in~~ ~~the~~fees ~~year~~and ~~ended~~accretion ~~December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. This was the result of us not having to calculate the costs of the conversion feature~~ on ~~convertible~~Notes ~~notes~~Payable ~~in 2009, as we were required to in 2008.~~

The interest we incurred on notes payable decreased by $60,142 in the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. This was the result of us not having to record accretion expense in the current year on the debt discount associated with the convertible promissory note having a principal of $150,000.

Foreign Exchange gain (loss)

We incurred a reduction in foreign exchange ~~loss~~ of $~~101~~72,649 ~~806~~ for the ~~year~~ ~~ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $109,387 from the gain of $7,581 recorded in the~~ year ended December 31, ~~2008.~~2010, ~~The~~due ~~primary~~to ~~for~~changes ~~the increase was as a result of our outstanding convertible promissory notes now being repayable~~ in ~~Canadian~~US ~~dollars~~dollar ~~resulting~~compared ~~in us being required~~ to ~~adjust the notes to their~~Canadian ~~US$ equivalent each reporting period~~dollar.

Interest fees and accretion on Notes Payable

The interest, fees and accretion we incurred on notes payable decreased by $ 385,325 in the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. This was primarily as a result of us having to calculate a beneficial conversion on the issuance of our convertible promissory notes in 2008 in the total amount of $482,124; this amount was charged to income upon the issuance of the notes due to their being repayable on demand. We were not required to calculate a similar charge in our 2009 fiscal year.

Legal Fees

Our legal fees decreased in the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 by $659,~~653~~445 compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009. This was the result of us not requiring as much legal services during the year ~~2009~~2010, because of reduction in activity.

Management Fees

Our management fees decreased in the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 by $~~594~~11,~~034~~647 compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009. ~~This~~Management ~~was~~fees arose in the ~~result~~ ofyear usended ~~not~~December ~~granting~~31, ~~options~~2009 oras a result of issuing shares for management services ~~during~~whereas ~~2009~~no tosuch issuances were incurred in the year ended ~~consultants~~December ~~and~~31, ~~directors~~2010.

-Rent, 20Transfer -Agent and Travel

~~Rent/Public~~Our ~~Relations~~combined rental expenses, transfer agent fees and ~~Transfer~~travel expenses ~~Agent~~decreased in the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 by $63,960. This was mainly the result of the Company acquiring 100% of the outstanding shares of Vardisto Investments during the year, an entity to which we were paying for the rent of office premises.

Our combined rental expenses, public relations and transfer agent fees increased in the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 by $4,774. This was mainly the result of an increase in rental fees for our premises in Athens, Greece.

Office and Bank Charges

Our combined office and bank charges decreased in the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 by $352,~~725~~115 compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009. This was mainly the result of us undertaking less ~~activity and the result of our rental agreement for our office in Athens, Greece including office expense~~activities.

Write-Down of Investment in Molecular Vision

Our expenses increased by $588,070 for the year ended December 31, 2010, because of the write-down in our investment in Molecular Vision to a nominal value of $1.00.

Investor Relations and Public Relations

Our expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2010 by $7,324 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 as we provided shares for services to various investors that assisted the company.

Research and Development

Our ~~expenditures~~expenses onincreased ~~research~~for ~~and development were nil in~~ the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 ~~compared to~~ by $~~648~~1,~~407~~349,225 incompared to the year ended December 31, 2009, as we expensed in ~~2008.~~process ~~This~~research ~~was~~and development charges acquired in the ~~result~~acquisition of usVardisto Investments ~~not~~as ~~having~~required ~~any~~by ~~research~~the ~~and~~guidance ~~development expenditures~~of inUS ~~2009,~~GAAP aswhen wethe ~~are~~acquisition noof ~~longer~~an entity ~~developing~~is determined to be the ~~BioLED~~acquisition ~~Technology~~of assets.

~~Travel~~- 23 -

Our travel expenses decreased by $115,560 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. This was the result of us terminating two consultants in 2008 and we were required to pay their travel expenses.

Going Concern

We have historically incurred losses and have incurred a loss of $~~937~~2,~~573~~957,670 for the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and $3937,~~022,005~~573 for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009. Because of these historical losses, we will require additional working capital to develop our business operations. We intend to raise additional working capital through private placements, public offerings, bank financing and/or advances from related parties or shareholder loans.

The continuation of our business is dependent upon obtaining further financing and achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current or future stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

There are no assurances that we will be able to either (i) achieve a level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; or (ii) obtain additional financing through either private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing necessary to support our working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from operations and any private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing are insufficient, we will have to raise additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to us. If adequate working capital is not available we may cease operations.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.

- 21 -

We base our assumptions and estimates on historical experience and other sources that we believe to be reasonable at the time. Actual results may vary from our estimates due to changes in circumstances, weather, politics, global economics, mechanical problems, general business conditions and other factors. Our significant estimates are related to the valuation of warrants and options.

There are accounting policies that we believe are significant to the presentation of our financial statements. The most significant of these accounting policies relates to the valuation of intellectual property, the accounting for our research and development expenses and stock-based compensation expense.

Investment in Molecular Vision

We have made an equity investment in Molecular Vision, a privately held company incorporated in Great Britain and whose business is complementary to the our business, as described in more detail under the heading “Business – Corporate History”. This investment is accounted for under the cost method of accounting, as we held less than 20% of the voting stock outstanding and did not exert significant influence over this company. We assess the recoverability of this investment by reviewing various indicators of impairment. We also ~~review~~reviewed the sales of Molecular Vision securities to other investors ~~when~~ when that is a more reliable indicator of the fair value of our shareholdings and reviewed cash flow projections prepared by Molecular Vision. As a result of performing a review of the fair value of our investment in the shares of of Molecular Vision for the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded a write-down of the investment in the amount of $239,330 and a further reduction of $827,400 for the year ended December 31, 2010 based on our determination that there was a decline in the value of the investment that was other than temporary.

- 24 -

Stock-based Compensation

We account for all of our stock-based payments and awards under the fair value based method.

Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if the Company had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments. The cost of the stock-based payments to non-employees that are fully vested and non-forfeitable as at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.

We account for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. Share based awards granted to employees with a performance condition are measured based on the probable outcome of that performance condition during the requisite service period. We assess the probability of any performance condition being achieved we accrue the value of the award if it is probable that a performance condition will be achieved. Compensation costs for stock-based payments to employees that do not include performance conditions are recognized on a straight-line basis. The fair value of all share purchase options are expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional capital surplus. Upon exercise of share purchase options, the consideration paid by the option holder, together with the amount previously recognized in additional capital surplus, is recorded as an increase to share capital.

We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility.. ASC 718 does not allow companies to account for option forfeitures as they occur. Instead, estimated option forfeitures must be calculated upfront to reduce the option expense to be recognized over the life of the award and updated upon the receipt of further information as to the amount of options expected to be forfeited.

- 22 -

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

InThere ~~March~~are ~~2008,~~no ~~the~~accounting ~~FASB~~pronouncements ~~issued~~that ~~guidance~~the ~~included in ASC 815-10~~Company ~~“Derivatives~~recently ~~and~~adopted ~~Hedging,”~~or ~~which seeks to enhance disclosure about how and why a company uses derivatives; how derivative instruments~~ are ~~accounted~~pending ~~for and~~the ~~how derivatives affect a company~~Company’s ~~financial~~adoption ~~position,~~that ~~financial~~are ~~performance and~~expected ~~cash~~to ~~flows. This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for~~have ~~fiscal~~a ~~years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 815-10 on January 1, 2009 had no~~ material impact on the Company’s financial ~~statements~~position or results of operations.

In June 2008, the FASB ratified guidance which is now part of ASC 815-40, “Contracts Indexed to the Entity’s Own Equity”. The objective of this issue is to provide guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. This Issue applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded feature that has all the characteristics of a derivative instrument or an instrument which may be potentially settled in an entity’s own stock regardless of whether the instrument possess derivative characteristics. This issue provides a two-step approach to assist in making these determinations and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 815-40 on January 1, 2009 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued additional disclosure requirements related to fair values, which are included in ASC 820, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” The provisions require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The required disclosures were effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the provisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s statements of financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC No. 855, “Subsequent Events,” which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. It sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date and up to the date the financial statements are issued. ASC 855 was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. All other accounting literature not included in the ASC is now non-authoritative. The ASC was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and its adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value,” or ASU 2009-05, which amends ASC 820 to provide clarification of a circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. A reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following methods: 1) a valuation technique that uses a) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or b) quoted prices for similar liabilities (or similar liabilities when traded as assets) and/or 2) a valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of ASC 820. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to adjust to include inputs relating to the existence of transfer restrictions on that liability. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Applicable

- 23 -

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

- 2425 -

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

(A Development Stage Company)

	Tel: 604 688 5421	BDO Canada LLP
	Fax: 604 688 5132	600 Cathedral Place
	www.bdo.ca	925 West Georgia Street
	Vancouver BC V6C 3L2 Canada

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2009 and 2008

(Stated in US Dollars)

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Directors and Stockholders,

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(a Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Acrongenomics, Inc. (the “Company”), (Aa Development Stage Company) as of December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in capital deficit for the years then ended and for the period ~~from~~ from August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, ~~2009~~2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, these financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Acrongenomics, Inc. ~~(A Development Stage Company)~~ as of December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~ 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, ~~2009~~2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $2730,~~570~~528,~~395~~065 at December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and incurred a net loss of $~~937~~2,~~573~~957,670 for the year then ended. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ BDO Canada LLP BDO Canada LLP Chartered Accountants Vancouver, Canada March 9, 2012

~~Chartered~~ACRONGENOMICS, ~~Accountants~~INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

Vancouver, Canada April 14, 2010

ASSETS		December 31,			December 31,
		2010			2009

Current
Cash		6,615		$	4,303
Prepaid expenses and deposit		-			15,000
		6,615			19,303

Deposit		-			14,142
Patent and other intangible assets - Note 4		49,737			-
Investment in Molecular Vision - Note 3		1			827,401
	$	56,353		$	860,846

LIABILITIES

Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities - Note 8	$	1,124,731		$	721,149
Promissory notes payable - Note 6		690,913			658,522
Loans payable - Note 7		60,758			1,000
		1,876,402			1,380,671

Promissory note payable - Notes 4 and 6		1,394,969			-
		3,271,371			1,380,671


CAPITAL DEFICIT

Capital stock - Note 9
Authorized:
100,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001 per share
Issued and outstanding:
27,783,481 common shares (December 31, 2010 - 25,580,481)		27,783			25,580
Additional paid-in capital		27,285,264			27,024,990
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(30,528,065	)		(27,570,395	)
		(3,215,018	)		(519,825	)
	$	56,353		$	860,846

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars)

ASSETS
		2009			2008
Current
Cash	$	4,303		$	22,044
Prepaid expenses and deposit		15,000			17,618
		19,303			39,662
Deposit – Note 13		14,142			-
Investment in Molecular Vision Ltd. – Note 3		827,401			791,230
	$	860,846		$	830,892
LIABILITIES
Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities – Note 7	$	721,149		$	510,965
Convertible promissory notes payable – Note 5		658,522			394,136
Loans payable – Note 6		1,000			1,000
		1,380,671			906,101
CAPITAL DEFICIT
Common stock – Note 8
Par value $0.001 100,000,000 shares authorized 25,580,481 shares issued (2008: 23,906,731)		25,580			23,906
Additional paid-in capital		27,024,990			26,507,207
Share subscriptions		-			26,500
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(27,570,395	)		(26,632,822	)
		(519,825	)		(75,209	)
	$	860,846		$	830,892

Nature of Operations and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern – Note 1 Commitments – Note 10

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

~~F-1~~ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS for the Years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

		Years Ended						August 17,1999
		December 31,						(Date of Inception)
		2010			2009			to December 31, 2010
Expenses
Accounting and audit fees - Note 8	$	171,483		$	156,248		$	898,565
Amortization of patents		-			-			741,430
Appraisals		-			-			14,500
Bank charges		1,304			1,981			20,019
Consulting fees - Notes 8 and 9		468,176			307,437			3,376,681
In-process research and development - Note 4		1,349,225			-			1,349,225
Investor relations		14,924			7,600			602,020
Legal fees		23,516			82,961			452,086
Management fees		-			11,647			3,326,506
Office and miscellaneous		2,279			3,717			142,091
Rent - Note 8		1,907			61,127			171,337
Research and development - Note 8		-			-			9,202,266
Transfer agent and filing fees		7,289			7,050			47,032
Travel		-			4,979			456,587
Write-down of patents					-			8,004,447

Loss before other income (expenses)		(2,040,103	)		(644,747	)		(28,804,792	)

Other income (expenses)
Interest income		-			10			23,150
Interest, fees and accretion on notes payable - Note 8		(61,010	)		(121,152	)		(688,639	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability - Note 5		-			169,452			169,452
Write-down of investment in Molecular Vision - Note 3		(827,400	)		(239,330	)		(1,066,730	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)		(29,157	)		(101,806	)		(118,508	)

Loss from continuing operations	$	(2,957,670	)	$	(937,573	)	$	(30,486,067	)
Loss from discontinued operations		-			-			(41,998	)

Net loss for the period	$	(2,957,670	)	$	(937,573	)	$	(30,528,065	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.04	)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding		26,329,892			24,951,580

								August 17, 1999
								( Date of
								Inception ) to
		For the years ended						December 31,
		December 31						2009
		2009			2008			cumulative
Expenses
Accounting and audit fees – Note 7	$	156,248		$	187,481		$	727,082
Amortization of patents		-			-			741,430
Appraisals		-			-			14,500
Bank charges		1,981			4,052			18,715
Consulting fees – Note 7		307,437			759,164			2,908,505
Legal fees - Note 7		82,961			89,614			428,570
Management fees – Note 7		11,647			605,681			3,326,506
Office and miscellaneous		3,717			37,370			139,812
Public relations and donation		7,600			5,102			587,096
Rent - Note 7		61,127			59,538			169,430
Research and development – Note 7		-			648,407			9,202,266
Transfer agent and filing fees		7,050			6,363			39,743
Travel		4,979			120,539			456,587
Write-down of patents		-			-			8,004,447
Operating loss		(644,747	)		(2,523,311	)		(26,764,689	)
Interest income		10			202			23,150
Interest, fees and accretion on notes payable – Note 7		(121,152	)		(506,477	)		(627,629	)
Write-down of investment in Molecular Vision – Note 3		(239,330	)		-			(239,330	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability – Note		169,452			-			169,452
Foreign exchange gain (loss)		(101,806	)		7,581			(89,351	)
Loss from continuing operations		(937,573	)		(3,022,005	)		(27,528,397	)
Loss from discontinued operations		-			-			(41,998	)
Net loss for the period	$	(937,573	)	$	(3,022,005	)	$	(27,570,395	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.14	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		24,951,580			21,203,764

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

~~F-2~~ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the period from August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS for the Years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

								August 17,1999
		Years ended December 31,						(Date of Inception) to
		2010			2009			December 31, 2010

Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	$	(2,957,670	)	$	(937,573	) $		(30,528,065	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Amortization of patents					-			741,430
Financing fee on convertible promissory note					7,500			7,500
In-process research and development		1,349,225			-			1,349,225
Write-down of investment in Molecular Vision		827,400			239,330			1,066,730
Change in fair value of derivative liability		-			(169,452	)		(169,452	)
Accretion of debt discount					56,138			538,262
Unrealized foreign exchange		29,349			98,141			127,490
Shares issued for consulting and management fees		129,825			-			1,442,325
Loan origination fee - Note 6		-			16,245			16,245
Stock-based compensation		35,352			21,871			1,939,067
Write-down of patents		-			-			8,004,447
Changes in non-cash working capital balances related to operations:
Prepaid expenses and deposit		15,000			2,618			-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		403,795			210,184			2,958,559
Net cash used in operating activities		(167,724	)		(454,998	)		(12,506,237	)

Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities
Issuance of common shares		91,300			584,400			12,855,738
Share purchase warrants		-			-			370,307
Common stock subscriptions		-			-			29,800
Issuance of convertible notes		-			142,500			836,636
Repayment of convertible note		-			-			(300,000	)
Loan payable		59,758			-			60,758
Net cash provided by financing activities		151,058			726,900			13,853,239

Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
Investment in Molecular Vision		-			(275,501	)		(1,373,140	)
Cash acquired in asset acquisition		4,836			-			4,836
Refund on termination of development agreement		-			-			149,794
Deposit		14,142			(14,142	)		-
Patents		-			-			(121,877	)
Net cash used in investing activities		18,978			(289,643	)		(1,340,387	)

Increase (decrease) in cash during the period		2,312			(17,741	)		6,615
Cash, beginning of period		4,303			22,044			-
Cash, end of period	$	6,615		$	4,303		$	6,615

								August 17,
								1999 (Date of
		For the Years Ended						Inception) to
		December 31,						December 31,
		2009			2008			2009
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	$	(937,573	)	$	(3,022,005	)	$	(27,570,395	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of patents		-			-			741,430
Financing fee on convertible promissory note		7,500			-			7,500
Write-down of investment in Molecular Vision		239,330						239,330
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(169,452	)		-			(169,452	)
Accretion of debt discount		56,138			482,124			538,262
Unrealized foreign exchange loss		98,141			-			98,141
Shares issued for consulting and management fees		-			667,500			1,312,500
Loan origination fee – Note 5		16,245			-			16,245
Stock-based compensation		21,871			454,919			1,903,715
Write-down of patents		-			-			8,004,447
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
Prepaid expenses and deposit		2,618			4,662			(15,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		210,184			105,410			2,554,764
Net cash used in operating activities		(454,998	)		(1,307,390	)		(12,338,513	)
Cash Flows used in Investing Activity
Investment in Molecular Vision		(275,501	)		(1,097,639	)		(1,373,140	)
Refund on termination of development agreement with Molecular Vision		-			149,794			149,794
Deposit		(14,142	)		-			(14,142	)
Patents		-			-			(121,877	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(289,643	)		(947,845	)		(1,359,365	)
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities
Common stock issued for cash		584,400			1,509,648			12,764,438
Stock purchase warrants		-			-			370,307
Common stock subscriptions		-			29,800			29,800
Issuance of convertible notes		142,500			694,136			836,636
Repayment of convertible note		-			(300,000	)		(300,000	)
Increase in loan payable		-			-			1,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		726,900			1,933,584			13,702,181
Increase (decrease) in cash during the period		(17,741	)		(321,651	)		4,303
Cash, beginning of period		22,044			343,695			-
Cash, end of period	$	4,303		$	22,044		$	4,303

Supplemental Cash Flow Information - Note 12

Non-cash Transactions – Note 14

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

~~F-3~~ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL DEFICIT for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL DEFICIT for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

											Deficit
		Common Stock									Accumulated
							Additional		Share		During the
							Paid-in		Subscriptions		Development
			Shares		Par Value		Capital		(Receivable)		Stage			Total
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.001		5,000,000	$	5,000	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	5,000
	at $0.01		5,000,000		5,000		45,000		-					50,000
Net loss for the period			-		-		-		-		(2,116	)		(2,116	)

Balance, December 31, 1999			10,000,000		10,000		45,000		-		(2,116	)		52,884
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.20		100,000		100		19,900		-		-			20,000
Net loss for the year			-		-		-		-		(8,176	)		(8,176	)

Balance, December 31, 2000			10,100,000		10,100		64,900		-		(10,292	)		64,708
Net loss for the year			-		-		-		-		(205	)		(205	)

Balance, December 31, 2001			10,100,000		10,100		64,900		-		(10,497	)		64,503
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.20		15,000		15		2,985		-		-			3,000
Net loss for the year			-		-		-		-		(24,818	)		(24,818	)

Balance, December 31, 2002			10,115,000		10,115		67,885		-		(35,315	)		42,685
Net loss for the year			-		-		-		-		(21,576	)		(21,576	)

Balance, December 31, 2003			10,115,000		10,115		67,885		-		(56,891	)		21,109

											Deficit
		Common Stock									Accumulated
						Additional			Share		During the
						Paid-in			Subscriptions		Development
		Shares		Par Value		Capital			(Receivable)		Stage			Total
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.001	5,000,000	$	5,000	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	5,000
	at $0.01	5,000,000		5,000		45,000			-					50,000
Net loss for the period		-		-		-			-		(2,116	)		(2,116	)
Balance, December 31, 1999		10,000,000		10,000		45,000			-		(2,116	)		52,884
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.20	100,000		100		19,900			-		-			20,000
Net loss for the year		-		-		-			-		(8,176	)		(8,176	)
Balance, December 31, 2000		10,100,000		10,100		64,900			-		(10,292	)		64,708
Net loss for the year		-		-		-			-		(205	)		(205	)
Balance, December 31, 2001		10,100,000		10,100		64,900			-		(10,497	)		64,503
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.20	15,000		15		2,985			-		-			3,000
Net loss for the year		-		-		-			-		(24,818	)		(24,818	)
Balance, December 31, 2002		10,115,000		10,115		67,885			-		(35,315	)		42,685
Net loss for the year		-		-		-			-		(21,576	)		(21,576	)
Balance, December 31, 2003		10,115,000		10,115		67,885			-		(56,891	)		21,109
Pursuant to the acquisition of patent	at $1.96	4,000,000		4,000		7,836,000			-		-			7,840,000
Capital stock issued for patent commission	at $1.96	400,000		400		783,600			-		-			784,000
Capital stock issued for cash	at $1.00	420,000		420		419,580			-		-			420,000
Capital stock issued for commission	at $1.00	42,000		42		41,958			-		-			42,000
Less: commission		-		-		(77,000	)		-		-			(77,000	)
Capital stock issued for cash	at $2.30	537,956		538		1,236,761			-		-			1,237,299
Capital stock issued for commission		50,594		50		116,316			-		-			116,366
Less: commission		-		-		(116,366	)		-		-			(116,366	)
Capital contribution		-		-		6,000			-		-			6,000
Stock subscriptions		-		-		-			426,329		-			426,329
Net loss for the year		-		-		-			-		(1,863,376	)		(1,863,376	)
Balance, December 31, 2004		15,565,550	$	15,565	$	10,314,734		$	426,329	$	(1,920,267	)	$	8,836,361

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

~~F-4~~ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDA TED STA TEM ENT OF CHA NGES IN CA PITA L DEFICIT for the period A ugust 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL DEFICIT for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

									Deficit
		Common Stock							A ccumulated
					A dditional		Share		During the
					Paid-in		Subscriptions		Development
			Shares	Par Value	Capital		(Receivable)		Stage		Total

Balance, December 31, 2003 - brought forward			10,115,000	10,115	67,885		-		(56,891	)	21,109
Pursuant to the acquisition of patent	at $1.96		4,000,000	4,000	7,836,000		-		-		7,840,000
Capital stock issued for patent commission	at $1.96		400,000	400	783,600		-		-		784,000
Capital stock issued for cash	at $1.00		420,000	420	419,580		-		-		420,000
Capital stock issued for commission	at $1.00		42,000	42	41,958		-		-		42,000
Less: commission			-	-	(77,000	)	-		-		(77,000	)
Capital stock issued for cash	at $2.30		537,956	538	1,236,761		-		-		1,237,299
Capital stock issued for commission			50,594	50	116,316		-		-		116,366
Less: commission			-	-	(116,366	)	-		-		(116,366	)
Capital contribution			-	-	6,000		-		-		6,000
Stock s ubscriptions			-	-	-		426,329				426,329
Net loss for the year			-	-	-		-		(1,863,376	)	(1,863,376	)

Balance, December 31, 2004 - brought forward			15,565,550	15,565	10,314,734		426,329		(1,920,267	)	8,836,361

Capital stock issued for cash	at $2.30		72,500	73	166,677		-		-		166,750
	at $2.40		108,168	108	259,495		-		-		259,603
	at $3.50		551,443	551	1,929,499		-		-		1,930,050
	at $4.00		915,125	915	3,659,585		(386,329	)	-		3,274,171
Capital stock issued for commission	at $4.00		81,337	82	325,266		-		-		325,348
Less: commission			-	-	(350,248	)	-		-		(350,248	)
Capital stock issued purs uant to the exercise of warrants	at $1.00		420,000	420	419,580		-		-		420,000
Stock-based compensation			-	-	364,000		-		-		364,000
Capital stock issued for consulting s ervices	at $4.68		100,000	100	467,900		-		-		468,000
Net loss from continuing operations			-	-	-		-		(14,152,210	)	(14,152,210	)
Net loss from discontinued operations			-	-	-		-		(1,935	)	(1,935	)
Capital contribution from subsidiary on disposition			-	-	(6,000	)	-		-		(6,000	)
Balance, December 31, 2005			17,814,123	17,814	17,550,488		40,000		(16,074,412	)	1,533,890

															Deficit
			Common Stock												Accumulated
									Additional			Share			During the
									Paid-in			Subscriptions			Development
			Shares			Par Value			Capital			(Receivable)			Stage			Total
Balance, December 31, 2004		$	15,565,550		$	15,565		$	10,314,734		$	426,329		$	(1,920,267	)	$	8,836,361
Capital stock issued for cash	at $2.30		72,500			73			166,677			-			-			166,750
	at $2.40		108,168			108			259,495			-			-			259,603
	at $3.50		551,443			551			1,929,499			-			-			1,930,050
	at $4.00		915,125			915			3,659,585			(386,329	)		-			3,274,171
Capital stock issued for commission	at $4.00		81,337			82			325,266			-			-			325,348
Less: commission			-			-			(325,348	)		-			-			(325,348	)
commission			-			-			(24,900	)		-			-			(24,900	)
Capital stock issued for cash pursuant to exercise of warrants	at $1.00		420,000			420			419,580			-			-			420,000
Stock-based compensation			-			-			364,000			-			-			364,000
Capital stock issued for consulting services	at $4.68		100,000			100			467,900			-			-			468,000
Net loss from continuing operations			-			-			-			-			(14,152,210	)		(14,152,210	)
Net loss from discontinued operations															(1,935	)		(1,935	)
Capital contribution from subsidiary on disposition			-			-			(6,000	)		-			-			(6,000	)
Balance, December 31, 2005			17,814,123			17,814			17,550,488			40,000			(16,074,412	)		1,533,890
Cancellation of shares			(4,000,000	)		(4,000	)		4,000			-			-			-
Stock-based compensation			-			-			529,673			-			-			529,673
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.75		317,334			317			237,683			-			-			238,000
Less: share issue costs			-			-			(6,300	)		-			-			(6,300	)
Net loss for the year			-			-			-			-			(2,480,288	)		(2,480,288	)
Balance, December 31, 2006			14,131,457			14,131			18,315,544			40,000			(18,554,700	)		(185,025	)
Capital stock issued for cash:	at $0.50		220,000			220			109,780			(40,000	)		-			70,000
	at $0.80		250,000			250			199,750			-			-			200,000
	at $1.10		2,230,924			2,231			2,451,785			(3,300	)		-			2,450,716
Capital stock issued for commission			126,090			126			(126	)		-			-			-
Less: commission - cash			-			-			(64,021	)		-			-			(64,021	)
Stock as bonus	at $0.86		750,000			750			644,250			-			-			645,000
Stock issued to settle accounts payable	at $1.00		158,000			158			157,842			-			-			158,000
Stock-based compensation			-			-			533,252			-			-			533,252
Net loss for the year			-			-			-			-			(5,056,117	)		(5,056,117	)
Balance, December 31, 2007		$	17,866,471		$	17,866		$	22,348,056		$	(3,300	)	$	(23,610,817	)	$	(1,248,195	)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

~~F-5~~ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL DEFICIT for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL DEFICIT for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

											Deficit
		Common Stock									Accumulated
							Additional		Share		During the
							Paid-in		Subscriptions		Development
			Shares		Par Value		Capital		(Receivable)		Stage		Total

Balance, December 31, 2005 - brought forward			17,814,123		17,814		17,550,488		40,000		(16,074,412	)	1,533,890
Cancellation of shares			(4,000,000	)	(4,000	)	4,000		-		-		-
Stock-based compensation			-		-		529,673		-		-		529,673
Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.75		317,334		317		237,683		-		-		238,000
Less: share issue costs			-		-		(6,300	)	-		-		(6,300	)
Net loss for the year			-		-		-		-		(2,480,288	)	(2,480,288	)

Balance, December 31, 2006 - brought forward			14,131,457		14,131		18,315,544		40,000		(18,554,700	)	(185,025	)

Capital stock issued for cash:	at $0.50		220,000		220		109,780		(40,000	)	-		70,000
	at $0.80		250,000		250		199,750		-		-		200,000
	at $1.10		2,230,924		2,231		2,451,785		(3,300	)	-		2,450,716
Capital stock issued for commission			126,090		126		(126	)	-		-		-
Less: commission - cash			-		-		(64,021	)	-		-		(64,021	)
Stock as bonus	at $0.86		750,000		750		644,250		-		-		645,000
Stock issued to settle accounts payable	at $1.00		158,000		158		157,842		-		-		158,000
Stock-based compensation			-		-		533,252		-		-		533,252
Net loss for the year			-		-		-		-		(5,056,117	)	(5,056,117	)

Balance, December 31, 2007			17,866,471		17,866		22,348,056		(3,300	)	(23,610,817	)	(1,248,195	)

												Deficit
		Common Stock										Accumulated
						Additional			Share			During the
						Paid-in			Subscriptions			Development
		Shares		Par Value		Capital			(Receivable)			Stage			Total
Balance, December 31, 2007		17,866,471	$	17,866	$	22,348,056		$	(3,300	)	$	(23,610,817	)	$	(1,248,195	)
Stock Subscriptions		-		-		-			29,800			-			29,800
Capital stock issued for cash:	- at $0.80	1,250,010		1,250		998,758			-			-			1,000,008
	- at $1.10	90,000		90		98,910			-			-			99,000
	- at $0.40	1,450,250		1,450		578,650			-			-			580,100
Capital stock issued for consulting and management fees	- at $0.95	150,000		150		142,350			-			-			142,500
	- at $0.53	150,000		150		79,350			-			-			79,500
	- at $0.27	1,650,000		1,650		443,850			-			-			445,500
Less: commission - cash		-		-		(169,460	)		-			-			(169,460	)
Capital stock issued to settle accounts payable:	- at $0.95	150,000		150		142,350			-			-			142,500
	- at $0.79	1,150,000		1,150		907,350			-			-			908,500
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes		-		-		482,124			-			-			482,124
Stock-based compensation		-		-		454,919			-			-			454,919
Net loss for the year		-		-		-			-			(3,022,005	)		(3,022,005	)
Balance, December 31, 2008		23,906,731		23,906		26,507,207			26,500			(26,632,822	)		(75,209	)
Capital stock issued for cash	- at $0.40	1,673,750		1,674		667,826			(26,500	)		-			643,000
Less: commission		-		-		(58,600	)		-			-			(58,600	)
Reclassification of derivative liability – Note 5						(113,314	)								(113,314	)
Stock-based compensation – Note 8		-		-		21,871			-			-			21,871
Net loss for the period		-		-		-			-			(937,573	)		(937,573	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		25,580,481	$	25,580 $		27,024,990		$	-		$	(27,570,395	)	$	(519,825	)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

~~F-6~~ACRONGENOMICS , INC . (A Development Stage Company ) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL DEFICIT for the period August 17, 1999 (Date of Inception ) to December 31, 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars)

													Deficit
		Common Stock											Accumulated
							Additiona l			Share			During the
							Paid-in			Subscriptions			Development
			Shares		Par Valu e		Capital			(Receivable )			Stage			Total

Balance , December 31, 2007 - brought forward			17,866,471		17,866		22,348,056			(3,300	)		(23,610,817	)		(1,248,195	)

Stock Subscriptions			-		-		-			29,800			-			29,800
Capital stock issued for cash:	at $0.80		1,250,010		1,250		998,758			-			-			1,000,008
	at $1.10		90,000		90		98,910			-			-			99,000
	at $0.40		1,450,250		1,450		578,650			-			-			580,100
Capital stock issued for consulting and management fees	at $0.95		150,000		150		142,350			-			-			142,500
	at $0.53		150,000		150		79,350			-			-			79,500
	at $0.27		1,650,000		1,650		443,850			-			-			445,500
Less : commission - cash			-		-		(169,460	)		-			-			(169,460	)
Capital stock issued to settle accounts payable	at $0.95		150,000		150		142,350			-			-			142,500
	at $0.79		1,150,000		1,150		907,350			-			-			908,500
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes			-		-		482,124			-			-			482,124
Stock-based compensation			-		-		454,919			-			-			454,919
Net loss for the year			-		-		-			-			(3,022,005	)		(3,022,005	)

Balance , December 31, 2008			23,906,731		23,906		26,507,207			26,500			(26,632,822	)		(75,209	)

Capital stock issued for cash	at $0.40		1,673,750		1,674		667,826			(26,500	)		-			643,000
Less: commission			-		-		(58,600	)		-			-			(58,600	)
Reclassification of derivative liabilit y			-		-		(113,314	)		-			-			(113,314	)
Stock-based compensation			-		-		21,871			-			-			21,871
Net loss for the year			-		-		-			-			(937,573	)		(937,573	)

Balance , December 31, 2009			25,580,481		25,580		27,024,990			-			(27,570,395	)		(519,825	)

Capital stock issued for cash :	at $0.40		25,000		25		9,975			-			-			10,000
	at $0.20		175,000		175		34,825			-			-			35,000
	at $0.10		548,000		548		54,252			-			-			54,800
Capital stock issued for services :	at $0.10		985,000		985		97,515			-			-			98,500
	at $0.07		447,500		448		30,877			-			-			31,325
Capital stock issued for commission :	at $0.10		10,000		10		990			-			-			1,000
	at $0.40		12,500		12		4,988			-			-			5,000
Less: commission paid			-		-		(8,500	)		-			-			(8,500	)
Stock-based compensatio n			-		-		35,352			-			-			35,352
Net loss for the period			-		-		-			-			(2,957,670	)		(2,957,670	)

Balance, December 31, 2010			27,783,481	$	27,783	$	27,285,264		$	-		$	(30,528,065	)	$	(3,215,018	)

Note 1	Nature of Operations and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
	The Company is in the development stage and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. The Company’s business is research and development in the field of life science including BioLED technology.
	These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its obligations and commitments in the normal course of operations. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2009, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, had an accumulated deficit of $27,570,395 (2008 - $26,632,822) since its inception and incurred a net loss of $937,573 (2008 - $3,022,005) for the year then ended and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management expects the Company’s cash requirement over the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2010 to be $1,800,000 to continue operations. The Company plans to raise necessary cash through equity issuances and/or debt financing. While the Company is expending its best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds for operations.
	The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada, USA on August 17, 1999 as Cellway Ventures Inc. Effective February 25, 2004, the Company changed its name to Acrongenomics, Inc.
Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to deferred income tax asset valuations, asset impairment, stock based compensation and loss contingencies. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

~~F-7~~ACRONGENOMICS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars)

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 2

Note 1	Business Description, Basis of Presentation and Liquidity


	Business

	The Company is a development stage company focusing on commercializing novel technology platforms concerning the life sciences sector. The Company intends to focus its resources on the development of a compound as a potential cholesterol-lowering agent to treat effectively hypercholesterolemia, the research and experimental results of which were acquired in the acquisition of Vardisto Investments Ltd (“Vardisto”). Additionally, the acquisition of Vardisto included the intellectual property associated with the development of a system called IKAROS-1000, a sophisticated and environmentally friendly fire extinguishing system.

	Basis of Presentation and Liquidity

	These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and the instructions to Form 10-K.

	These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its obligations and commitments in the normal course of operations. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2010, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, had an accumulated deficit of $30,528,065 since its inception and incurred a net loss of $2,957,670 for the year then ended and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management has no formal plan in place to address this concern but is considering obtaining additional funds by either debt or equity financing. While the Company is expending its best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds for operations.

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

	a)	Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to deferred income tax asset valuations, asset impairment, conversion features embedded in convertible notes payable, derivative valuations, stock based compensation and loss contingencies.

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
	The financial statements have, in management’s opinion been properly prepared within the framework of the significant accounting principles summarized below:
	a)	Development Stage
		The Company is devoting substantially all of its present efforts to establish a new business and none of its planned principal operations have commenced. All losses accumulated since inception has been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.
	b)	Investment in Molecular Vision Ltd.
		The Company has made an equity investment in Molecular Vision Ltd., a privately held company incorporated in Great Britain and whose business is complementary to the Company’s business. This investment is accounted for under the cost method of accounting, as the Company held less than 20% of the voting stock outstanding and did not exert significant influence over this company. The Company records an impairment write-down to its investment when the cost of the investment exceeds its fair value and when the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary.
	c)	Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
		The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made.
	d)	Financial Instruments
		The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, convertible promissory notes payable and loans payable approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of such instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company is subject to foreign exchange price risk as it periodically incurs expenses and accrues liabilities denominated in Euros. The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates.

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 2

F-8

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

	a)	Use of Estimates – (cont’d)

		The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

	b)	Principles of Consolidation

		These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Acrongenomics, Inc and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vardisto Investments Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of Cyprus. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.

	c)	Segment Reporting

		The Company has determined that it currently operates in only one segment, which is the research and development of novel technology platforms concerning the life sciences sector. Substantially all of the Company’s long-term assets, consisting of patents and other intangible assets, are located in Cyprus.

	d)	Development Stage

		The Company is devoting substantially all of its present efforts to establish a new business and none of its planned principal operations have commenced. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

	e)	Investment in Molecular Vision Ltd.

		The Company has made an equity investment in Molecular Vision Ltd., a privately held company incorporated in Great Britain and whose business is complementary to the Company’s business. This investment is accounted for under the cost method of accounting, as the Company held less than 20% of the voting stock outstanding and did not exert significant influence over this company. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $827,400 (2009 - $239,330) on its investment in Molecular Vision due a decline in the fair value of the investment that was considered other than temporary. ( Note 3)

	f)	Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

		The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made.

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 3

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
	e)	Income Taxes
	g)	Financial Instruments
		The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and loans payable approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of such instruments. The fair value of the Company’s $2,000,000 promissory note is discussed in Note 6. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company is subject to foreign exchange price risk as it periodically incurs expenses and accrues liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates.
	h)	Income Taxes
		The Company has adopted the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
		The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740 "Income Taxes" which changed the framework for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes and provided a comprehensive model to recognize, measure, present, and disclose in our financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. The Company initially recognizes tax positions in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Application requires numerous estimates based on available information. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, and our recognized tax positions and tax benefits may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. As additional information is obtained, there may be a need to periodically adjust the recognized tax positions and tax benefits. These periodic adjustments may have a material impact on the consolidated statements of operations.
	f)	Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
	i)	Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
		The basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is computed similar to basic loss per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2009, loss per share excludes 7,944,680 (December 31, 2008 – 7,328,550) potentially dilutive common shares (related to outstanding options, warrants and shares and warrants issuable on the conversion of convertible promissory notes) as their effect was anti- dilutive.
		The basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is computed similar to basic loss per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2010, loss per share excludes 7,742,430 (December 31, 2009 – 7,944,680) potentially dilutive common shares (related to outstanding options, warrants and shares and warrants issuable on the conversion of convertible promissory notes) as their effect was anti-dilutive.

FAcrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars) -9 Page 4

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 4

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)


	j)	Foreign Currency Translation

		The Company’s functional currency is the United States dollar. The Company uses the United States dollar as its reporting currency for consistency with registrants of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Transactions undertaken in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are translated using the exchange rate in effect as of the transaction date. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in the exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated results in foreign currency transaction gains or losses and are included in the Statement of Operations in the period in which they arise.

	k)	Stock-based Compensation


		The Company accounts for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value based method.

		Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if the Company had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments on an accelerated basis. The cost of the stock-based payments to non-employees that are fully vested and non-forfeitable as at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.

		The Company accounts for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. Share based awards granted to employees with a performance condition are measured based on the probable outcome of that performance condition during the requisite service period. Such an award with a performance condition is accrued if it is probable that a performance condition will be achieved. Compensation costs for stock-based payments to employees that do not include performance conditions are recognized on a straight-line basis. The fair value of all share purchase options is expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional capital surplus. Upon exercise of share purchase options, the consideration paid by the option holder, together with the amount previously recognized in additional capital surplus, is recorded as an increase to share capital

		The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
	g)	Foreign Currency Translation
		The Company’s functional currency is the United States dollar. The Company uses the United States dollar as its reporting currency for consistency with registrants of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Transactions undertaken in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are translated using the exchange rate in effect as of the transaction date. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in the exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated results in foreign currency transaction gains or losses and are included the Statement of Operations in the period in which they arise.
	h)	Stock-based Compensation
		The Company accounts for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value based method.
		Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if the Company had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments on an accelerated basis. The cost of the stock-based payments to non-employees that are fully vested and non-forfeitable as at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.
		The Company accounts for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. Share based awards granted to employees with a performance condition are measured based on the probable outcome of that performance condition during the requisite service period. Such an award with a performance condition is accrued if it is probable that a performance condition will be achieved. Compensation costs for stock-based payments to employees that do not include performance conditions are recognized on a straight-line basis. The fair value of all share purchase options is expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional capital surplus. Upon exercise of share purchase options, the consideration paid by the option holder, together with the amount previously recognized in additional capital surplus, is recorded as an increase to share capital
		The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 5

F-10

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

	l)	Research and Development

		Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. In process research and development costs (“IPR&D”) acquired in a business combination are capitalized; otherwise, IPR&D acquired in asset acquisitions are expensed to operations in the period in which they are acquired.

	m)	Intangible assets

		Finite-lived intangible assets, consisting primarily of patent charges with a remaining statutory life of 20 years, are recorded at cost, net of accumulated amortization and, if applicable, impairment charges. Amortization of finite-lived intangible assets is provided over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. Finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

	n)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements

		There are no accounting pronouncements that the Company recently adopted or are pending the Company’s adoption that are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 3	Investment in Molecular Vision Ltd.

	The Company’s investment in Molecular Vision Ltd. (“Molecular”) is summarized as follows:

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 5

	Number and Class of Molecular
	shares owned
	Class A Preferred	Class A
	Shares	Ordinary Shares		Amount
Balance - December 31, 2008	-	33,734		791,230
Acquisition of Molecular Class A Preferred shares for GBP £166,042	19,426	-		275,501
Less: Write-down of Class A Ordinary shares	-	-		(239,330	)
Balance as at December 31, 2009	19,426	33,734	$	827,401
Less: Write-down of Class A ordinary and Preferred shares	-	-		(827,400	)
Balance as at December 31, 2010	19,426	33,734	$	1

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
	i)	Research and Development
		Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
	j)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
		In March 2008, the FASB issued guidance included in ASC 815-10 “Derivatives and Hedging,” which seeks to enhance disclosure about how and why a company uses derivatives; how derivative instruments are accounted for and how derivatives affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 815-10 on January 1, 2009 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
		In June 2008, the FASB ratified guidance which is now part of ASC 815-40, “Contracts Indexed to the Entity’s Own Equity”. The objective of this issue is to provide guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. This Issue applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded feature that has all the characteristics of a derivative instrument or an instrument which may be potentially settled in an entity’s own stock regardless of whether the instrument possess derivative characteristics. This issue provides a two-step approach to assist in making these determinations and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 815-40 on January 1, 2009 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
		In April 2009, the FASB issued additional disclosure requirements related to fair values, which are included in ASC 820, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” The provisions require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The required disclosures were effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the provisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s statements of financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
		In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC No. 855, “Subsequent Events,” which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. It sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date and up to the date the financial statements are issued. ASC 855 was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 6

F-11

Note 3	Investment in Molecular Vision Ltd. – (cont’d)

	During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $239,330 on its investment in Class A Ordinary Shares of Molecular to an amount equivalent to what other investors paid for these shares. This amount was determined to be more representative of an exit price in accordance with the guidance of ASC 820.

	During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company determined the fair value of its investment in Molecular Vision Ltd. to be impaired due to the inability of Molecular Vision Ltd. to obtain additional financing in order to develop its BioLED technology to the stage of commercial applications. Accordingly, the Company has written down its investment to $1 in recognition thereof.

Note 4	Acquisition of Vardisto Investments Ltd.

	On December 29, 2010, the Company completed a transaction by which it acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Vardisto Investments Limited (“Vardisto”), a private company located in Cyprus for consideration consisting of a promissory note (“the Note”). The promissory note is due on or before December 31, 2013 for the principal sum of $2,000,000, together with interest thereon at a rate equal to four (4%) percent per annum compounded annually.

	The Company will have the option and right at any time until the Note is fully paid to convert any amount outstanding, including accrued interest into common shares at the average closing price of the three days prior to conversion.

	The promissory note has been recorded at its fair value on issuance in the amount of $1,394,969 by determining its present value at inception using a risk-adjusted discount rate of 17.3%. The resulting discount from its face value in the amount of $605,031 will be accreted to income over the term of the note.

	The acquisition of Vardisto Investments Ltd. was not considered to be a business combination primarily because the set of assets and activities of Vardisto Investments did not include the processes requisite to meet the definition of a business. Therefore, the transaction has been accounted for as an acquisition of assets by the Company. The transaction has been measured at fair value with the allocation of the purchase price based on the assets acquired, measured at fair value at the date of the acquisition. The assets of Vardisto include investments in two companies incorporated in Cyprus of which it owns 80% and 65% interests respectively. The Company has not recorded any non-controlling interest in respect of these investments in its consolidated financial statements due to their immateriality.

	The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired is as follows:

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 6

Cash	$	4,836
Patents and other assets		49,737
Accounts payables		(8,829	)
Fair value of net assets acquired	$	45,744
Consideration paid:
Convertible promissory note	$	1,394,969

Note 2	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
	j)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements – (cont’d)
		In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. All other accounting literature not included in the ASC is now non-authoritative. The ASC was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and its adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.
		In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value,” or ASU 2009-05, which amends ASC 820 to provide clarification of a circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. A reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following methods: 1) a valuation technique that uses a) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or b) quoted prices for similar liabilities (or similar liabilities when traded as assets) and/or 2) a valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of ASC 820. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to adjust to include inputs relating to the existence of transfer restrictions on that liability. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The excess of consideration over fair value of net assets acquired totalling $1,349,225 has been included in “In Process Research and Development” expense for the year ended December 31, 2010.

~~Note~~Acrongenomics, 3Inc. ~~Investment~~(A inDevelopment ~~Molecular~~Stage ~~Vision~~Company) ~~Ltd.~~Notes ~~The~~to ~~Company’s~~the ~~investment~~Consolidated inFinancial ~~Molecular~~Statements ~~Vision~~December ~~Ltd.~~31, 2010 and 2009 (~~“Molecular”)~~Stated isin ~~summarized~~US asDollars) ~~follows:~~- Page 7

		Number and Class of Molecular shares owned
Note 5	Fair Value Measurements
		Class A	Class A
	ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:
		Preferred Shares	Ordinary Shares		Amount
	Level 1 -	quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Balance, December 31, 2007		-	-	$	-
	Level 2 -	observable inputs other than Level 1, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived prices whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable; and
Acquisition of Molecular shares for GBP £550,000		-	16,566		1,097,639
	Level 3 -	assets and liabilities whose significant value drivers are unobservable by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Refund of amounts previously advanced on termination of development agreement:
	As at December 31, 2010, the Company has determined that it does not hold any Level 1 assets and its shareholdings in Molecular Vision, which are measured on a non-recurring basis, represent Level 2 assets.
Credit applied to amounts owed Molecular		-	-		(156,615	)
	The fair value changes of the Company’s Level 2 assets are summarized as follows:
Cash refunded		-	-		(149,794	)
Molecular shares received as consideration for termination of development agreement		-	17,168		-
Balance - December 31, 2008		-	33,734		791,230
Acquisition of Molecular Class A Preferred shares for GBP £166,042		19,426	-		275,501
Less: Write-down of Class A Ordinary shares		-	-		(239,330	)
Balance as at December 31, 2009		19,426	33,734	$	827,401

F-12

		Beginning Value							Ending Fair
		of		Shares		Impairment			Value of Level 2
		Level 2 Assets		Acquired		Charge			Assets
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2010	$	827,401	$	-	$	(827,400	)	$	1

For the 12 months ended December 31, 2009	$	791,230	$	275,501	$	(239,330	)	$	827,401

~~Acrongenomics~~The Company’s embedded conversion features in each of the $394,136 ~~Inc.~~and (A$150,000 ~~Development~~convertible ~~Stage~~promissory ~~Company~~notes (Note 6) ~~Notes~~contain toclauses that call for the ~~Financial~~repayment ~~Statements~~of ~~December~~the 31note at a foreign exchange rate of not less than $1US = $CDN1.27. In accordance with ASC 815-40-15, ~~2009~~a ~~and~~conversion ~~2008~~option ~~(Stated~~embedded in USa ~~Dollars)~~convertible debt instrument that is denominated in a currency other than the issuer's functional currency fails the “fixed-for ~~Page~~fixed” 7criteria of that guidance thus requiring bifurcation as a derivative liability. Given the decline in the cumulative fair value of the Company’s shares and warrants to below the conversion prices inherent in these notes, the derivative liability has a fair value of $Nil at December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009: $Nil)

Note 3	Investment in Molecular Vision Ltd. – (cont’d)
	By a development agreement dated February 13, 2007 and amended May 23, 2007, the Company agreed to collaborate with Molecular to acquire the exclusive rights to commercialize certain technology relating to the analysis/diagnostic fields (BioLED Technology), to contract Molecular to complete the research and development necessary to achieve manufacturable prototypes and have first right of refusal to fund the development of additional applications of the technology by agreeing to pay $4,225,700 (GBP£2,325,000) (this sum is in addition to the GBP£575,000 previously paid under the February 13, 2007 agreement) over 3 years and grant 2,000,000 share purchase options entitling the holders thereof the right to purchase one common share of the Company at $0.50 per share. The options were to vest at 50% per milestone and be exercisable within a period of 5 years from the date of vesting. As the vesting of the share purchase options granted were contingent upon the performance milestones, no value was ascribed to them as it was unlikely that they would be vested. These options did not vest and were cancelled pursuant to the termination of the development agreement as noted below.
	Molecular also granted to the Company an exclusive, worldwide, perpetual license to the intellectual property to develop and commercialize it, subject to the payment to the vendor of a royalty of 30% of gross receipts.
	On January 31, 2008, by a Heads of Terms agreement dated in November 2007 and amended February 1, 2008, the Company acquired 16,566 common shares amounting to 13.97 % of the share capital of Molecular at that date for $1,097,639 (GBP£550,000).
	By a letter agreement dated August 19, 2008 and formalized November 12, 2008, the development agreement was terminated. As consideration for the Company’s contributions made under the development agreement and in lieu of certain rights granted under the development agreement, Molecular will pay to the Company royalties of 0.3-0.5% on net product sales and 3% to 5% of licensing fees received by Molecular until patents owned by Molecular expire and issued to the Company 17,168 common shares of Molecular for which no value has been recorded. In addition, the Company received a refund of $306,409 (GBP£200,000) for amounts previously advanced during the year ended December 31, 2008 to Molecular for research and development costs but which had not been utilized. The amount was refunded as follows: $156,615 (GBP£98,500) applied to amounts owing to Molecular and the remaining $149,794 (GBP£101,500) was refunded in cash. The Company was also granted the option to purchase 4,518 shares of Molecular at £33.20 ($60.34) per share from three founders of Molecular on or before December 31, 2008. On December 31, 2008, this option expired unexercised.
	During the year ended December 31, 2009, Molecular undertook additional equity financings and the Company participated in the Molecular offerings by acquiring 19,426 Class A Preferred Shares at a cost of £ 8.55 (US$14.18) per share for a total of £166,093 (US$ 275,501). Each Class A preferred share of Molecular is convertible into one common share at any time. As a result of this additional acquisition, the Company’s ownership in the equity of Molecular represented 17.2% of Molecular’s total outstanding shares (December 31, 2008: 17.2%).

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 8

~~F-13~~Note 5 Fair Value Measurements – (cont’d) The resulting derivatives are required to be measured at their fair value each reporting period and they constitute Level 3 liabilities given that they have no active market and are measured based on information that is unobservable. A summary of the Company’s Level 3 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 8

				Derivative Liabilities
		Beginning Value		bifurcated from		Change in fair			Ending Fair
		of		convertible		value of derivative			Value of Level 3
		Level 3 Liabilities		promissory notes		liabilities			Liabilities
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2010	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-

For the 12 months ended December 31, 2009	$	-	$	169,452	$	(169,452	)	$	-

Note 3	Investment in Molecular Vision Ltd. – (cont’d)
	In addition to its offering of Class A Preferred shares, during its fiscal year ended July 31, 2009, Molecular raised equity financing through additional offerings of its Class A Ordinary shares to other investors at a price of £10.21 per share. Molecular is a private company in the United Kingdom and undertakes infrequent equity offerings and, there is no active market for transactions of its shares. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 820, the Company determined that the price paid by other investors for the Class A Ordinary shares of Molecular was representative of an exit price providing evidence of the fair value of its holding of Molecular Class A Ordinary shares. As a result, the Company wrote-down its shareholdings of Molecular Class A Ordinary shares during the year ended December 31, 2009 to the equivalent of £10.21 per share; this write-down totalled $239,330 (2008: $Nil).
Note 4	Fair Value Measurements
	ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:
	Level 1 -	quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
	Level 2 -	observable inputs other than Level I, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived prices whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable; and
	Level 3 -	assets and liabilities whose significant value drivers are unobservable by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
	As at December 31, 2009, the Company has determined that it does not hold any Level 1 assets and its shareholdings in Molecular Vision, which are measured on a non-recurring basis, represent Level 2 assets.

F-14

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 9

Note 4 Fair Value Measurements – (cont’d) The fair value changes of the Company’s Level 2 assets are summarized as follows:

		Beginning Value				Refund and						Ending Fair
		of		Shares		Credit Applied			Impairment			Value of Level
		Level 2 Assets		Acquired		to Shareholding			Charge			2 Assets
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2009	$	791,230	$	275,501	$	-		$	(239,330	)	$	827,401
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2008	$	-	$	1,097,639	$	(306,409	)	$	-		$	791,230

During the year ended December 31, 2009, in accordance with ASC 815-40-15, the Company determined that the conversion features associated with its convertible promissory notes required bifurcation as derivative liabilities – (Note 5). The resulting derivatives are required to be measured at their fair value each reporting period and they constitute Level 3 liabilities given that they have no active market and are measured based on information that is unobservable. A summary of the Company’s Level 3 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

				Derivative
		Beginning Value		Liabilities		Change in fair
		of		bifurcated from		value of			Ending Fair
		Level 3		convertible		derivative			Value of Level 3
		Liabilities		promissory notes		liabilities			Liabilities
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2009	$	-	$	169,452	$	(169,452	)	$	-
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2008	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-

The Company determined for the fair value of the component of derivative liability represented by the warrants issuable on conversion of the promissory notes by using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions:

Expected life	2 years
	December 31, 2010	December 31, 2009
Expected Volatility	166.94% - 181.45%
Expected life	2 years	2 years
Risk free interest rate	1.00% - 1.70%
Expected Volatility	193.13%	166.94-181.45%
Dividend Yield	0%
Risk free interest rate	0.62%	1.00-1.70%
Dividend Yield	0%	0%

~~F-15~~Note 6 Promissory Notes Payable

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 10

		December 31,		December 31,
		2010		2009

$394,136 convertible promissory note

- principal	$	394,136	$	394,136
- foreign exchange adjustment		106,316		82,674

		500,452		476,810
$150,000 convertible promissory note

- principal		150,000		150,000
- loan origination fee		16,245		16,425
- foreign exchange adjustment		24,216		15,287

		190,461		181,712

Note 5	Convertible Promissory Notes Payable
	$394,136 Convertible Promissory Note
	During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company was loaned $394,136 by a director of the Company by the issuance of a convertible promissory note, payable on demand, with interest accruing on the balance of principal outstanding at 8% per annum, compounded monthly and payable monthly. The note is convertible into units of the Company at a price of $0.40 per unit. Each unit will consist of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 per share for a period of two years from the date of issuance. Upon the issuance of the note, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature totalling $292,124 which was accreted to income in its entirety and included in interest, fees and accretion on notes payable in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
	Effective March 1, 2009, the Company and the lender agreed to modify the terms of the note by increasing the interest rate to 10% per annum and by changing the terms of repayment such that the Company is to repay the note in Canadian dollars at a foreign exchange rate of not less than $1US = $1.27 Canadian. As a result of the Company having to repay the note in a currency other than its functional currency, in accordance with ASC 830-35-1 “Transaction Gains and Losses”, changes in the exchange rate between the US and Canadian dollar will affect the expected amount of the payment upon the settlement of the note requiring the Company to record the change in rate as a transaction gain or loss in the Statement of Operations. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $82,854 (2008: $Nil) on the note resulting in a balance payable as at December 31, 2009 of $476,990.
	Additionally, due to the Company having adopted ASC 815-40 as of the first day of the 2009 fiscal year, the conversion feature of this note failed the two-step evaluation criteria contained in ASC 815-40 and, as a result, it was determined that it was required to be bifurcated from the host contract and recorded as a derivative liability. At March 1, 2009, the Company determined that this liability had a fair value of $113,314 and, in accordance with ASC 815-40, this amount was reclassified from stockholders’ equity to derivative liability. In accordance with the guidance provided by ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, the Company re-measured the fair value of this derivative liability as at December 31, 2009 and determined its fair value then to be $Nil.
	During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company accrued interest of $35,483 (2008: $17,363) on this note.
	$150,000 Promissory Note
	On July 15, 2009, the Company was loaned an additional $150,000 by the same director of the Company by issuance of a convertible promissory note, payable on demand, with interest accruing on the balance of the principal outstanding at 10% per annum compounded monthly and payable monthly. The Company agreed to pay to the lender a 5% fee ($7,500) to cover the cost of obtaining funds. The note contained a similar repayment feature wherein the Company agreed to repay the note in Canadian dollars at a foreign exchange rate of not less than $1US = $1.27 Canadian. When the funds were advanced to the Company, the exchange rate was $1US = $1.1459 Canadian resulting in the loan being recorded at a value of $166,245 at its inception with $16,245 recorded as a loan origination fee. The note is convertible into units of the Company at a price of $0.40 per unit. Each unit will consist of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 per share for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 9

~~F-16~~Note 6 Promissory Notes Payable – (cont’d)

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 11

$2,000,000 promissory note
- principal		2,000,000			-
- debt discount		(605,031	)		-
- accretion		-			-
		1,394,969			-
		2,085,882			658,522
Less: current portion		(690,913	)		(658,522	)
	$	1,394,969		$	-

Note 5	Convertible Promissory Notes Payable – (cont’d)
	$150,000 Promissory Note – (cont’d)
	In accordance with ASC 830-35-1, for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $15,287 (2008: $Nil) on the note resulting in a balance payable as at December 31, 2009 of $181,532.
	The conversion feature of this note failed the two-step evaluation criteria contained in ASC 815-40 and, as a result, it was determined that it was required to be bifurcated from the host contract and recorded as a derivative liability. As at the inception of the note, the Company determined that this liability had a fair value of $56,138. As the note is repayable on demand, the resulting debt discount was accreted in its entirety to the Statement of Operations at the inception of the note. The Company re-measured the fair value of this derivative liability as at December 31, 2009 and determined its fair value then to be $Nil.
	During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company accrued interest of $5,786 (2008: $Nil) on this note.
	$300,000 Promissory Note
	On June 17, 2008 the Company was loaned $300,000 by the issuance of a convertible promissory note, maturing on September 30, 2008, with interest accruing on the balance of principal outstanding at 8% per annum, compounded monthly and payable monthly. The promissory note was convertible into units of the Company at any time and at the option of the lender at the rate of $0.40 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. The note was secured by an interest in all property of the Company and a further guarantee by a third party. Upon the issuance of the note, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature totalling $190,000 which was accreted to income in its entirety and included in interest, fees and accretion on notes payable in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year-ended December 31, 2008, Company repaid the amount owing on this note.
	These notes are collateralized by an interest in all property of the Company.
Note 6	Loans Payable
	Loans payable are unsecured, non-interest bearing and have no specific terms for repayment.

$394,136 Promissory Note

~~F-17~~During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company was loaned $394,136 by a director of the Company by the issuance of a convertible promissory note, payable on demand, with interest accruing on the balance of principal outstanding at 8% per annum, compounded monthly and payable monthly. The note is convertible into units of the Company at a price of $0.40 per unit. Each unit will consist of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 per share for a period of two years from the date of issuance. Upon the issuance of the note, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature totalling $292,124 which was accreted to income in its entirety and included in interest, fees and accretion on notes payable in the financial statements during the year ended December 31, 2008.

~~Acrongenomics~~Effective March 1, ~~Inc~~2009, the Company and the lender agreed to modify the terms of the note by increasing the interest rate to 10% per annum and by changing the terms of repayment such that the Company is to repay the note in Canadian dollars at a foreign exchange rate of not less than $1US = $1.27 (ACanadian. ~~Development~~As ~~Stage~~a result of the Company) ~~Notes~~having to repay the ~~Financial~~note ~~Statements~~in ~~December~~a 31currency other than its functional currency, ~~2009~~in accordance with ASC 830-35-1 “Transaction Gains and ~~2008~~Losses”, ~~(Stated~~changes in the exchange rate between the US ~~Dollars~~and Canadian dollar will affect the expected amount of the payment upon the settlement of the note requiring the Company to record the change in rate as a transaction gain or loss in the Statement of Operations. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $23,642 (2009: $82,674) -on ~~Page~~the 12note resulting in a balance payable as at December 31, 2010 of $500,452 (2009: $476,810).

~~Note~~Additionally, 7the ~~Related~~conversion ~~Party~~feature of ~~Transactions~~this ~~The~~note ~~Company~~failed ~~incurred~~ the ~~following~~two-step ~~charges~~evaluation ~~with~~criteria ~~directors~~contained in ASC 815-40 and, ~~officers~~as a result, ~~companies~~it ~~with~~was adetermined ~~common~~that ~~director~~it ~~and~~was ~~former~~required ~~director,~~to anbe ~~officer~~bifurcated from the host contract and ~~director~~recorded ofas a ~~company~~derivative ofliability. ~~which~~In aaccordance ~~former~~with ~~officer~~ASC 815, ~~and~~the ~~director~~Company is required to re-measure the ~~spouse~~fair value of the ~~Company’s~~derivative ~~president;~~at each ~~the~~reporting ~~research~~period ~~and~~with ~~development~~the ~~expenditures~~change ~~were~~in ~~paid~~fair tovalue recorded as a ~~company~~gain or loss in ~~which~~the aStatement ~~former~~of ~~officer~~Operations. ~~and~~At ~~director~~December of31, 2010, the Company isremeasured the fair ~~spouse~~value of the ~~Company’s~~derivative ~~former~~liability ~~president~~and determined it had a fair value of $nil (2009: $nil).

						August 17, 1999
		For the Years Ended				(Date of Inception)
						to
		December 31,				December 31,
		2009		2008		2009
Accounting fees	$	81,215	$	85,244	$	356,358
Consulting fees		158,000		169,600		724,901
Legal fees		-		-		60,656
Management fees		-		192,750		2,747,128
Rent		-		-		36,000
Research and development		-		-		5,604,189
Interest and accretion and fees on convertible Promissory notes - Note 5		121,152		309,487		430,639
	$	360,367	$	757,081	$	9.959,871

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company accrued interest of $44,697 (2009: $35,483) on this note.

Note 7	Related Party Transactions – (cont’d)
	Research and development expenditures charged by a related company were comprised of testing costs of the molecular diagnostic test products.
	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2009 includes $ 195,037 (December 31, 2008: $149,062) owing to companies with a common director, a former director and a company of which a former officer and director is the spouse of the Company’s former president for accounting, management and consulting services received.
Note 8	Common Stock
	On February 1, 2008, the Company issued 90,000 units at $1.10 per unit for total proceeds of $99,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one half common share purchase warrant exercisable for 18 months at a price of $1.50 per warrant.
	On February 1, 2008, the Company issued a total of 300,000 common shares to two consultants at a quoted market price of $0.95 per share for a total of $285,000 for their consulting services performed for the Company, of which 150,000 common shares were issued in respect of amounts previously accrued in accounts payable.
	On February 14, 2008, the Company issued 1,150,000 common shares to two consultants at a quoted market price of $0.79 per share for a total of $908,500 to settle accounts payable for past consulting services performed for the Company.

This note is secured by an interest in all property of the Company.

FAcrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars) -18 Page 10

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 13

Note 6	Promissory Notes Payable – (cont’d)

	$150,000 Promissory Note

	On July 15, 2009, the Company was loaned an additional $150,000 by the same director of the Company by issuance of a convertible promissory note, payable on demand, with interest accruing on the balance of the principal outstanding at 10% per annum compounded monthly and payable monthly. The note contained a similar repayment feature wherein the Company agreed to repay the note in Canadian dollars at a foreign exchange rate of not less than $1US = $1.27 Canadian. When the funds were advanced to the Company, the exchange rate was $1US = $1.1459 Canadian resulting in the loan being recorded at a value of $166,245 at its inception with $16,245 recorded as a loan origination fee. The note is convertible into units of the Company at a price of $0.40 per unit. Each unit will consist of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 per share for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

	For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $8,929 (2009: 15,287) on the note resulting in a balance payable as at December 31, 2010 of $190,461 (2009: $181,712).

	Additionally, the conversion feature of this note failed the two-step evaluation criteria contained in ASC 815-40 and, as a result, it was determined that it was required to be bifurcated from the host contract and recorded as a derivative liability. In accordance with ASC 815, the Company is required to re-measure the fair value of the derivative at each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded as a gain or loss in the Statement of Operations. At December 31, 2010, the Company re- measured the fair value of the derivative liability and determined it had a fair value of $nil (2009: $nil).

	During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company accrued interest of $16,313 (2009: $5,786) on this note.

	This note is secured by an interest in all property of the Company.

	$2,000,000 Promissory Note

	In conjunction with its acquisition of Vardisto Investments Ltd (Note 4), the Company issued a promissory note (“the Note”) due on or before December 31, 2013 for the principal sum of $US 2,000,000, together with interest thereon at a rate equal to four (4%) percent per annum compounded annually. The Company will have the option and right at any time until the Note is fully paid to convert any amount outstanding, including accrued interest into common shares at the average closing price of the three days prior to conversion. The promissory note has been recorded at its fair value on issuance in the amount of $1,394,969 with the resulting discount from its face value of $605,031 being accreted to income as interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest method. The Company has recorded no interest or accretion on the Note for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Note 7	Loans Payable

	On April 7, 2010, the Company was loaned €25,000 (US $33,090) by issuance of a promissory note, payable on demand, with interest accruing on the balance of the principal outstanding at 8 percent per annum compounding monthly and payable quarterly, maturing on October 1, 2010. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $40 on the note resulting in a balance payable as at December 31, 2010 of $33,130. The Company has negotiated with the holder of the loan to extend the maturity date to January 1, 2011.

Note 8	Common Stock – (cont’d)
	On February 15, 2008, the Company issued 1,250,010 units at $0.80 per unit for total proceeds of $1,000,008. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable for 18 months at a price of $1.60 per warrant.
	Between July 2, 2008 and February 6, 2009, the Company issued 2,141,500 units at $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $856,600 (2008: 1,450,250 units for total proceeds of $580,100). Each unit consisted of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 until April 20, 2009.
	On June 12, 2008, the Company issued 150,000 common shares to two consultants at a quoted market price of $0.53 per share for a total of $79,500 for their consulting services performed for the Company.
	On November 14, 2008, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to one consultant at a quoted market price of $0.27 per share for a total of $54,000 for consulting services rendered to the Company.
	On December 12, 2008, the Company issued 1,450,000 common shares to three consultants at a quoted market price of $0.27 per share for a total of $391,500 for their consulting services rendered to the Company.
	On February 6, 2009, the Company issued 625,000 units pursuant to a private placement at $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $250,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $25,000 on this placement.
	On February 6, 2009, the Company issued 66,250 units pursuant to a subscription received of $26,500 as at December 31, 2008. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years.
	On May 15, 2009, the Company issued 525,000 units pursuant to a private placement at $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $210,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $16,000 on this placement.
	On July 22, 2009, the Company issued 105,000 units pursuant to a private placement at $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $42,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $4,200 on this placement.
	On September 16, 2009, the Company issued 165,000 units pursuant to a private placement at $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $66,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $5,900 on this placement.

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 11

F-19

Note 7	Loans Payable – (cont’d)


	The Company received additional loans from two (2) other Shareholders of the Company in the amount of $8,000.

	During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company received additional unsecured advances from an officer of the Company totalling $18,628. These advances are non-interest bearing and have no specific terms for repayment. Loans payable at December 31, 2010 includes $19,628 (December 31, 2009: $1,000) owing to an officer and director and the spouse of an officer of the company.


Note 8	Related Party Transactions

	The Company incurred the following charges with directors and officers, companies with a common director and former director, an officer and director of a company of which a former officer and director is the spouse of the Company’s president; the research and development expenditures were paid to a company in which a former officer and director of the Company is the spouse of the Company’s former president.

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 14

						August 17, 1999
						(Date of
						Inception)
		For the Years Ended				to
		December 31,				December 31,
		2010		2009		2010
Accounting fees	$	61,271	$	81,215	$	417,629
Consulting fees		175,139		158,000		900,040
Legal fees		-		-		60,656
Management fees		-		-		2,747,128
Rent (Note 11)		-		-		36,000
Research and development		-		-		5,604,189
Interest and accretion and fees on convertible Promissory notes - Note 5		61,010		121,152		491,649
	$	297,420 $		360,367	$	10,257,291

Note 8	Common Stock – (cont’d)
	On September 30, 2009, the Company issued 137,500 units at $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $55,000. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $5,500 on this placement.
	On October 29, 2009, the Company issued 50,000 units @ $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $20,000. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $2,000 on this placement.
	Commitments
	a)	Share Purchase Warrants
		A summary of changes in the Company’s share purchase warrants for the year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 outstanding is presented below:

Research and development expenditures charged by a related company were comprised of testing costs of the molecular diagnostic test products.

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
			Weighted			Weighted
			Average			Average
	Number of		Exercise	Number of		Exercise
	Warrants		Price	Warrants		Price
Outstanding, beginning of year	3,257,870		$1.20	1,548,213		$1.42
Issued	1,673,750		$0.75	2,745,260		$1.15
Expired	(1,807,620	)	$1.57	(1,035,603	)	$1.37
Outstanding, end of year	3,124,000		$0.75	3,257,870		$1.20

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2010 includes $393,917 (December 31, 2009: $195,037) owing to companies with a common director, a former director and a company of which a former officer and director is the spouse of the Company’s former president and a company subject to significant influence for accounting, management, consulting services received and rent.

FDuring the 12 months ended December 31, 2010, the Board of Directors approved the grant of 500,000 options to a director of the company for services rendered. The options vest on a graded vesting schedule where 25% of the options will vest 3 months after the grant date and every 3 months thereafter until fully vested. They have an exercise price of $0.50 per share and are exercisable for a period of 8 years from the date of issue. Of the 500,000 options granted, there were 250,000 that vested during the year ended December 31, 2010 for which the Company recorded stock-20based compensation totalling $31,139 (Note 9).

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 1512

Note 8	Common Stock – (cont’d)
Note 9	Common Stock
	Commitments – (cont’d)
	On February 6, 2009, the Company issued 625,000 units pursuant to a private placement at $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $250,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $25,000 on this placement.
	b)	Share Purchase Warrants – (cont’d)
	On February 6, 2009, the Company issued 66,250 units pursuant to two (2) subscriptions for a total of $26,500. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years.
	The following table summarizes the warrants outstanding as at December 31, 2009:
	On May 15, 2009, the Company issued 525,000 units pursuant to three (3) private placements at $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $210,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid commissions totalling $19,000 consisting of $16,000 cash and 7,500 shares issued at a fair value of $0.40 per share on this placement.
	On July 22, 2009, the Company issued 105,000 units at $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $42,000 received on February 1, 2010. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $4,200 on this placement.
	On September 16, 2009, the Company issued 165,000 units pursuant to four (4) private placements at $0.40 per share for total proceeds of $66,000. Each unit consisted of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $5,900 on this placement.
	On October 29, 2009, the Company issued 137,500 units at $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $55,000. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $5,500 on this placement.
	On October 29, 2009, the Company issued 50,000 units at $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $20,000. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of 5,000 shares for this placement.
	On April 15, 2010, the Company issued 25,000 units at $0.40 per unit for total proceeds of $10,000. Each unit consists of one share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.75 for a period of two (2) years.
	On May 14, 2010, the Company issued 175,000 units at $0.20 per unit for total proceeds of $35,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years.
	On August 9, 2010, the Company issued 985,000 fully vested shares at a fair value of $0.10 per share based on quoted market price for a total of $98,500 in respect of consulting services rendered.
	On August 9, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of 10,000 shares.

Number Outstanding	Exercise
and Exercisable	Price	Expiry Date
290,000	$0.75	July 31,2010
317,750	$0.75	August 31, 2010
120,000	$0.75	September 30,2010
375,000	$0.75	October 31, 2010
347,500	$0.75	December 31, 2010
20,000	$0.75	January 31,2011
671,250	$0.75	February 28, 2011
525,000	$0.75	May 31, 2011
165,000	$0.75	September 30, 2011
187,500	$0.75	October 31, 2011
105,000	$0.75	February 28, 2012
3,124,000

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 13

	c)	Stock Based Compensation Plan
Note 9	Common Stock – (cont’d)
		In May, 2005, the Company adopted a stock option plan which provides for the granting of stock options to selected directors, officers, employees or consultants in an aggregate amount of up to 2,600,000 common shares of the Company and, in any case, the number of shares to be issued to any one individual pursuant to the exercise of options shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding share capital. The grant of stock options, exercise prices and terms are determined by the Company's Board of Directors.
	On August 9, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $1,000.
		A summary of changes in the Company’s stock options for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2009 is presented below:
	On August 24, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $1,000 on this placement.
	On September 22, 2010, the Company issued 102,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $10,200. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $1,000 on this placement.
	On October 13, 2010, the Company issued 12,500 shares at $0.40 per share in respect of commissions.
	On November 3, 2010, the Company issued 146,000 units at $0.10 per unit for total proceeds of $14,600. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $0.50 for a period of two (2) years. The Company paid a commission of $1,500 on this placement.
	On November 11, 2010, the Company issued 447,500 fully vested common shares at a fair value of $0.07 based on quoted market price for a total of $31,325 for consulting services rendered to the Company.
	Commitments
	Share Purchase Warrants
	A summary of changes in the Company’s share purchase warrants for the year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 outstanding is presented below:

	December 31, 2009				December 31, 2008
	December 31, 2010				December 31, 2009
				Weighted				Weighted
				Average				Average
	Number of			Exercise	Number of			Exercise
	Options			Price	Options			Price
	Warrants			Price	Warrants			Price
Outstanding, beginning of period	23,~~100~~124,000		$	$0.8675	3,~~500~~257,~~000~~870		$	$01.7020
Granted	-			-	700,000			$0.57
Issued	748,000		$	0.51	1,673,750		$	0.75
Cancelled	-			-	(2,100,000	)		$0.50
Expired	(1,450,250	)	$	0.75	(1,807,620	)	$	1.57
Outstanding, end of period	2,~~100~~421,~~000~~750		$	$0.8668	23,~~100~~124,000		$	$0.8675
Exercisable, end of period	2,050,000			$0.86	1,800,000			$0.92

FAcrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars) -21 Page 14

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 16

Note 9	Common Stock – (cont’d)

	Commitments – (cont’d)

	Share Purchase Warrants – (cont’d)

	The following table summarizes the warrants outstanding as at December 31, 2010:

Note 8	Common Stock – (cont’d)
	Number Outstanding		Exercise
	Commitments – (cont’d)
	and Exercisable		Price	Expiry Date
	c)	Stock Based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)
	20,000		$0.75	January 31,2011	*
		At December 31, 2009, the following stock options were outstanding:
	671,250		$0.75	February 28, 2011	*
	525,000		$0.75	May 31, 2011	*
	165,000		$0.75	September 30, 2011	*
	187,500		$0.75	October 31, 2011	*
	105,000		$0.75	February 28, 2012	*
	25,000		$0.75	April 15, 2012
	723,000		$0.50	June 15, 2012
	2,421,750

Number of shares
						Aggregate
Total		Number	Exercise	Expiry		Intrinsic
Number		Vested	Price	Date		Value
600,000	(1)	600,000	$1.00	March 22, 2012	$	-
100,000	(2)	100,000	$2.50	May 3, 2016	$	-
600,000	(3)	600,000	$0.50	February 12, 2017	$	-
500,000	(4)	500,000	$0.60	March 31, 2018	$	-
100,000	(5)	100,000	$0.50	April 1, 2018	$	-
200,000	(6)	150,000	$0.50	April 1, 2018	$	-
2,100,000		2,050,000

* subsequent to December 31, 2010, these warrants expired unexercised

	(1)	These options had fully vested in the year ended December 31, 2008. There was no stock- based compensation recognized in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and an amount of $106,521 was recognized and included with management fees in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
	(2)	These options had fully vested at December 31, 2007. There was no stock-based compensation expense recognized in the financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
	(3)	As at December 31, 2009, these options had fully vested. The fair value of these options on their grant date was calculated to be $198,000 which was being amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting term. The Company recognized $11,647 (2008: $99,000) included with management fees in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.
	(4)	These options had fully vested during the year ended December 31, 2008. There was no stock-based compensation recognized in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and an amount of $159,563 was recognized and included with consulting fees in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
	(5)	These options had fully vested as at December 31, 2008. There was no stock-based compensation recognized in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and an amount of $53,410 was recognized and included with management fees in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
	(6)	As at December 31, 2009, 150,000 of these options were fully vested. The remaining 50,000 options vested on April 1, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized stock-based compensation of $10,224 (2008: $36,425) included in consulting fees in the financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation Plan

~~F-22~~In May, 2005, the Company adopted a stock option plan which provides for the granting of stock options to selected directors, officers, employees or consultants in an aggregate amount of up to 2,600,000 common shares of the Company and, in any case, the number of shares to be issued to any one individual pursuant to the exercise of options shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding share capital. The grant of stock options, exercise prices and terms are determined by the Company's Board of Directors.

~~Acrongenomics,~~A ~~Inc.~~summary (Aof ~~Development~~changes ~~Stage~~in the Company)’s stock ~~Notes~~options tofor the ~~Financial~~year ~~Statements~~ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~the ~~(Stated~~year inended USDecember 31, ~~Dollars)~~2009 -is ~~Page~~presented 17below:

Note 8	Common Stock – (cont’d)
			December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	Commitments – (cont’d)
					Weighted			Weighted
	a)	Stock Based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)
					Average			Average
	The fair value of stock options granted has been determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions applied to stock options granted during the years:
			Number of		Exercise	Number of		Exercise
			Options		Price	Options		Price
	Outstanding, beginning of period		2,100,000	$	0.76	2,100,000	$	0.76
	Granted		500,000	$	0.50	-		-
	Outstanding, end of period		2,600,000	$	0.71	2,100,000	$	0.76
	Exercisable, end of period		2,350,000	$	0.73	2,050,000	$	0.77

	2009	2008
Expected dividend yield	-	0.0%
Expected volatility	-	83.0% - 90.8%
Risk-free Interest Rate	-	4.04% - 4.81%
Term in years	-	5.0 - 10.0
Fair value	-	$0.33 - $1.01

Acrongenomics, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(Stated in US Dollars) - Page 15

A summary of changes in the Company’s unvested stock options for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is presented below:

Note 9	Common Stock – (cont’d)

	Commitments – (cont’d)

	Stock-Based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)

	At December 31, 2010 the following stock options were outstanding:

				2009						2008
	Number of shares
				Weighted		Weighted				Weighted	Weighted
									Aggregate
				Average		Average				Average	Average
	Total		Number		Exercise		Expiry		Intrinsic
		Number of		Exercise		Grant Date		Number of		Exercise	Grant Date
	Number		Vested		Price		Date		Value
		Options		Price		Fair Value		Options		Price	Fair Value
	600,000	(1)	600,000	$	1.00		March 22, 2012	$	-
Outstanding, beginning of year		300,000		$0.50		$0.43		2,825,000		$0.55	$0.40
	100,000	(2)	100,000	$	2.50		May 3, 2016	$	-
Granted		-		-		-		700,000		$0.57	$0.53
	600,000	(3)	600,000	$	0.50		February 12, 2017	$	-
Cancelled		-		-		-		(2,050,000	)	$0.50	$0.35
	500,000	(4)	500,000	$	0.60		March 31, 2018	$	-
Vested		(250,000	)	$0.50		$0.43		(1,175,000	)	$0.67	$0.56
	100,000	(5)	100,000	$	0.50		April 1, 2018	$	-
Outstanding, end of year		50,000		$0.50		$0.43		300,000		$0.50	$0.43
	200,000	(6)	200,000	$	0.50		April 1, 2018	$	-
	500,000	(7)	250,000	$	0.50		June 1, 2018	$	-
	2,600,000		2,350,000

As at December 31, 2009, there was a total of $674 of unrecognized compensation cost that is expected to be recognized in 2010 when the remaining options vest.

	(1)	As at December 31, 2010, these options had fully vested and no stock-based compensation was recognized in the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

	(2)	As at December 31, 2010, these options had fully vested and no stock-based compensation was recognized in the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

	(3)	As at December 31, 2010, these options had fully vested and no stock-based compensation was recognized in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009: $11,647).

	(4)	As at December 31, 2010, these options had fully vested and no stock-based compensation was recognized in the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

	(5)	As at December 31, 2010, these options had fully vested and no stock-based compensation was recognized in the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

	(6)	As at December 31, 2010, of these options had fully vested. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized stock-based compensation of $4,213 (2009: $10,224) included in consulting fees in the financial statements.

	(7)	These options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2010 and as that date, a total of 250,000 had fully vested. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized stock-based compensation of $31,139 included in consulting fees in the financial statements.

FAcrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars) -23 Page 16

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 18

Note 9	Common Stock – (cont’d)

	Commitments – (cont’d)

	Stock-Based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)

	The fair value of stock options granted has been determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions applied to stock options granted during the years:

Note 8	Common Stock – (cont’d)
			2010	2009
	Commitments – (cont’d)
	Expected dividend yield		0%	-
	c)	Stock Based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)
	Expected volatility		141.6% - 149.4%	-
	Stock-based compensation amounts, including those related to shares issued for non-cash consideration during the year, are classified in the Company’s Statement of Operations as follows:
	Risk-free Interest Rate		2.21% - 3.09%	-
	Term in years		8	-
	Fair value	$	0.07 - $0.23	-

		2009		2008
Consulting fees	$	10,224	$	863,488
Management fees		11,647		258,931
	$	21,871	$	1,122,419

A summary of changes in the Company’s unvested stock options for the year period ended December 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 is presented below:

Note 9 Income Taxes The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to the Company's estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

	December 31, 2010						December 31, 2009
				Weighted		Weighted				Weighted		Weighted
				Average		Average				Average		Average
	Number of			Exercise		Grant Date	Number of			Exercise		Grant Date
	Options			Price		Fair Value	Options			Price		Fair Value

Outstanding, beginning of period	50,000		$	0.50	$	0.43	300,000		$	0.50	$	0.43
Granted	500,000		$	0.50	$	0.10	-			-		-
Cancelled	-			-		-	-			-		-
Vested	(300,000	)	$	0.50	$	0.13	(250,000	)	$	0.50	$	0.43

Outstanding, end of period	250,000		$	0.50	$	0.08	50,000		$	0.50	$	0.43

		2009			2008
Deferred tax assets
Net operating losses carryforward	$	4,942,000		$	4,835,000
Undeducted accruals		244,000			104,000
Basis difference in convertible promissory notes		33,000			-
Basis difference in investment in Molecular Vision		81,000			-
Less: valuation allowance		(5,280,000	)		(4,939,000	)
Deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

As at December 31, 2010, there remains a total of $15,269 of unrecognized compensation expense that is expected to be recognized in 2011 when the remaining options vest.

~~The~~Stock-based ~~Company's~~compensation ~~income~~amounts, including ~~tax~~those ~~expense~~related to shares issued for ~~the~~ ~~years~~non-cash ~~ended~~consideration ~~December~~during 31the period, ~~2009~~are ~~and~~classified ~~2008~~in ~~differed~~the ~~from~~Company’s ~~the~~Statement ~~United~~of ~~States statutory~~Operations ~~rates~~as follows:

		2009			2008
			2010			2009
Effective tax rate		34%			34%
Consulting fees		$	165,177		$	21,871
Income tax benefit at statutory rate	$	(319,000	)	$	(1,027,000	)
Increase in income taxes resulting from:
Non-deductible expenses		9,000			2,000
Stock-based compensation		8,000			214,000
Effect of reclassification of derivative liability		(39,000	)		-
Research and development		-			221,000
Debt accretion		-			172,000
Change in valuation allowance		341,000			418,000
Income tax expense	$	-		$	-

FAcrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars) -24 Page 17

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 19

Note 10	Income Taxes


	The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to the Company's estimated deferred tax
	assets and liabilities are as follows:

Note 9	Income Taxes – (cont’d)
			2010			2009
	At December 31, 2009, the Company has incurred accumulated net operating losses in the United States of America totalling approximately $14,534,000 which are available to reduce taxable income in future taxation years.
	Deferred tax assets
	These losses expire as follows:
	Net operating losses carryforward	$	2,111,000		$	1,924,000
	Undeducted accruals		280,000			224,000
	Convertible promissory notes		43,000			33,000
	Investment in Molecular Vision		363,000			81,000
	Less: valuation allowance		(2,797,000	)		(2,262,000	)
	Deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

Year of Expiry		Amount
2021	$	10,000
2022		25,000
2023		23,000
2024		1,550,000
2025		5,316,000
2026		1,951,000
2027		4,115,000
2028		1,230,000
2029		314,000
	$	14,534,000

The Company's income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 differed from the United States statutory rates:

The Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future operations. When circumstances change and this causes a change in management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation allowance is reflected in current income. As management of the Company does not currently believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will receive the benefit of this asset, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been established at both December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

		2010			2009
Statutory tax rate		34%			34%

Income tax benefit at statutory rate	$	(1,006,000	)	$	(319,000	)
Increase in income taxes resulting from:
Non-deductible expenses		-			9,000
Effect of reclassification of derivative liability		-			(39,000	)
In process research and development		459,000			-
Stock-based compensation		12,000			8,000
Change in valuation allowance		535,000			341,000
Income tax expense	$	-		$	-

AsAt at December 31, ~~2009~~2010, the Company has isincurred inaccumulated ~~arrears~~net onoperating ~~filing~~losses ~~its~~in ~~statutory~~the ~~income~~United ~~tax~~States ~~returns~~of ~~and~~America totalling ~~the~~approximately ~~amounts presented~~$6,207 ~~above~~which are ~~based~~available onto ~~estimates.~~reduce ~~The~~taxable ~~actual~~income ~~losses~~in future ~~available~~taxation ~~could~~years. ~~differ from~~These ~~these~~losses ~~estimates.~~expire as follows:

Uncertain Tax Positions

Year of Expiry		Amount
2027		4,115,000
2028		1,230,000
2029		314,000
2030		548,000

	$	6,207,000

~~The Company has adopted ASC 740~~Acrongenomics, ~~"Accounting~~ ~~for~~Inc. ~~Uncertainty~~(A inDevelopment ~~Income~~Stage ~~Taxes" ("ASC 740"~~Company). ~~ASC~~Notes ~~740~~to ~~prescribes~~the ~~a recognition~~Consolidated ~~threshold~~Financial ~~and~~Statements ~~measurement~~December ~~attribute~~31, ~~for~~2010 ~~the recognition~~ and ~~measurement~~ of2009 ~~tax~~(Stated ~~positions taken or expected to be taken~~ in ~~income~~US ~~tax returns.~~Dollars) ~~ASC 740 also provides guidance on de~~-~~recognition~~ ofPage ~~income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions.~~18

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s tax returns are subject to tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities, or examinations by foreign tax authorities until the respective statute of limitation. It is subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for all taxation years commencing on or after 1999.

Note 10	Income Taxes – (cont’d)


	The Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future operations. When circumstances change and this causes a change in management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation allowance is reflected in current income. As management of the Company does not currently believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will receive the benefit of this asset, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been established at both December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

	As at December 31, 2010, the Company is in arrears on filing its statutory income tax returns and the amounts presented above are based on estimates. The actual losses available could differ from these estimates.

	Uncertain Tax Positions

	The Company has adopted ASC 740, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("ASC 740"). ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. ASC 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions.

	The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s tax returns are subject to tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities, or examinations by foreign tax authorities until the respective statute of limitation. It is subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for all taxation years commencing on or after 1999.

	Management’s analysis of ASC 740 supports the conclusion that the Company does not have any accruals for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2010. As a result, tabular reconciliation of beginning and ending balances would not be meaningful. If interest and penalties were to be assessed, we would charge interest to interest expense, and penalties to other operating expense. It is not anticipated that unrecognized tax benefits would significantly increase or decrease within 12 months of the reporting date.


Note 11	Commitments

	On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a consulting agreement at $10,000 per month. The agreement was for one year ending March 27, 2009. The agreement was then extended for another year ending March 27, 2010 and further year ended March 27, 2011, except if terminated by the parties. Subsequent to December 31, 2010, this contract was terminated by the Company.

	On October 1, 2008, the Company entered into a rent agreement at $5,000 per month. The agreement was for two years and contained an automatic renewal period for one additional year unless either party gives the other 30 days written notice of its intention not to further renew the agreement. Due to the acquisition of Vardisto Investment the rent agreement terminated September 30, 2010.

FAcrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars) -25 Page 19

Acrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Stated in US Dollars) - Page 20

Note 12	Non-cash Transaction

	Investing and financing activities that do not have a direct impact on current cash flows are excluded from the statements of cash flows.

	During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 1,432,500 (2009 - nil) common shares in respect of consulting fees. The fair value of these share issuances was $129,825 (2009 - nil).

	During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 22,500 (2009 – nil) common shares having a fair value of $6,000 (2009 – nil) in respect of payment of commissions.

	These transactions have been excluded from the statements of cash flows.

Note 13	Subsequent Events

Note 9	Income Taxes – (cont’d)
	1.	Subscription Agreements
	Uncertain Tax Positions – (cont’d)
		Subsequent to December 31, 2010:
	Management’s analysis of ASC 740 supports the conclusion that the Company does not have any accruals for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2009. As a result, tabular reconciliation of beginning and ending balances would not be meaningful. If interest and penalties were to be assessed, we would charge interest to interest expense, and penalties to other operating expense. It is not anticipated that unrecognized tax benefits would significantly increase or decrease within 12 months of the reporting date.
		a)	On February 15, 2011, the Company issued 75,000 shares at a value of $0.10 per share for a total of $7,500 for services.
Note 10	Commitments
		b)	On May 3, 2011, the Company received $10,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement for 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.50 for a period of two (2) years from the month of issue.
	(a)	On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a consulting agreement at $10,000 per month. The agreement was for one year ending March 27, 2009. The agreement was then extended for another year ending March 27, 2010, except if terminated by the parties.
		c)	On May 5, 2011, the Company received $30,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement for 300,000 units at $0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.50 for a period of two (2) years from the month of issue. A commission of $3,000 was paid on this subscription.
	(b)	On October 1, 2008, the Company entered into a rent agreement at $5,000 per month. The agreement is for two years and will renew for an additional one year unless either party gives the other 30 days written notice of its intention not to further renew the agreement. Either party may terminate the agreement by giving 30 days written notice
		d)	On May 11, 2011, the Company received $10,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement for 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.50 for a period of two (2) years from the month of issue.
Note 11	Contingencies
		e)	On May 31, 2011, the Company received $20,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement for 200,000 units at $0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.50 for a period of two (2) years from the month of issue.
	The Company is subject to various amounts claimed arising in the ordinary course of business and which are in dispute. There has not been any material amount accrued in the financial statements with respect to the various amounts claimed due to the Company being unable to make a reasonable estimate of any potential liability resulting from the resolution of these claims.
		f)	On June 10, 2011, the Company received $10,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement for 100,000 units at $0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.50 for a period of two (2) years from the month of issue. A commission of $1,000 was paid on this subscription.
Note 12	Subsequent Events
	Subsequent to December 31, 2009:
	a.	the Company received $10,000 pursuant to subscription agreements for 25,000 units at $0.40 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.75 for a period of two (2) years from the date of issuance. Commissions of 10% were paid in connection with this subscription.
	b.	the Company issued a convertible promissory note for proceeds received in the amount of €25,000 (US$ 33,700). The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is convertible into units of the Company at $0.20 per unit. Each unit will consist of one share and one share purchase warrant exercisable at $US 0.50 for a period of 2 years.

FAcrongenomics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Stated in US Dollars) -26 Page 20

~~Acrongenomics,~~Note ~~Inc.~~13 (ASubsequent ~~Development~~Events ~~Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008~~ (~~Stated in US Dollars~~cont’d) ~~- Page 21~~

Note 13	Deposit
		g)	On June 10, 2011, the Company received $20,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement for 200,000 units at $0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.50 for a period of two (2) years from the month of issue. A commission of $2,000 was paid on this subscription.
	In January 2009, the Company agreed to acquire 60% of the outstanding shares of a private Cyprus company which has beneficial ownership in intellectual property. As consideration for this acquisition, the Company intends to issue 9,000,000 common shares at $0.40 per share to the vendor. This acquisition will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141(R) whereby the Company will recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non- controlling interest at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. The acquisition has not yet closed and is conditional upon various approvals and other events occurring.
		h)	On October 31, 2011, the Company received $20,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement for 200,000 units at $0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share of the Company for $0.50 for a period of two (2) years from the month of issue.
	During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company advanced $14,142 (€10,000) to the vendor as a deposit on the acquisition. The Company intends to complete this transaction in 2010.
	2.	Promissory Notes
Note 14	Non-cash Transaction
		a)	Subsequent to December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a debt agreement in exchange for $53,000 in cash financing maturing on November 16, 2011. The convertible note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum to maturity and 22% thereafter. The note is convertible at 61% of the closing price of the common shares on the day prior to the conversion date. The debtor had sent a request for payment with penalty of 50% of the amount due by Acrongenomics for failure to file the required 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 by June 2011. The debtor postponed any action against Acrongenomics to allow the Company to file the required report.
	Investing and financing activities that do not have a direct impact on current cash flows are excluded from the statements of cash flows.
		b)	On March 25, 2011, subsequent to December 31, 2010, the Company signed a convertible promissory note in the amount of $50,000 USD. The note is convertible into shares of the Company at $0.08 per share.
	During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 1,950,000 common shares in respect of consulting fees. The fair value of these share issuances was $667,500.
	During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 1,300,000 common shares having a fair value of $1,051,000 in respect of settling accounts payable for unpaid consulting fees to two officers of the Company.
	These transactions have been excluded from the statements of cash flows.
Note 15	Comparative Figures
	Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation for the current period.

F-30

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2009. Based on this evaluation, these officers concluded that as of December 31, 2009, these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. These officers determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not adequate to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by our company in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) for our company. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance, not absolute assurance, regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officers, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control —Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, our management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2009, due to the existence of significant deficiencies constituting material weaknesses. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake.

- 25 -

Weaknesses Identified

Management has identified material weaknesses in our internal control processes over procurement and disbursements, primarily related to lack of segregations of duties.

More specifically, management has identified the following weaknesses:

Our company does not have a code of conduct or ethics;

Our company does not have Human Resources policies and Procedures and Function Activities are not clearly defined;

Our company does not have a specific Mission Statement or Key Performance indicators;

Our company's accounting staff does not have sufficient technical accounting knowledge relating to accounting for income taxes and complex US GAAP matters. Management corrected any errors prior to the release of our company's December 31, 2009 financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

We intend to implement remediation measures for the material weaknesses described in this annual report. Such remediation activities include the following:

	(1)	We intend to appoint independent members to our audit committee in the 2010 fiscal year; and
	(2)	We intend to update the documentation of our internal control processes, including formal risk assessment of our financial reporting processes as well as codify a code of conduct and ethics.
	(3)	We intend to update our business plan to include a Mission Statement and document our key performance indicators.
	(4)	We intend to engage the services of an independent consultant with sufficient expertise in complex US GAAP matters to assist us in the preparation of our financial statements

This report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management's report in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Certificates

Certificates with respect to disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting under Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act are attached to this annual report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION

None

- 26 -

~~PART~~ITEM ~~III~~9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

~~ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~None.

~~Directors~~ITEM ~~and~~9A. ~~Executive~~CONTROLS ~~Officers,~~AND ~~Promoters and Control Persons~~ PROCEDURES

AsDisclosure atControls ~~April 12, 2010, our directors~~ and ~~executive~~Procedures ~~officers, their age, positions held, and duration of such, are as follows:~~

Name	Position Held with our Company	Age	Date First Elected or Appointed
Platon Tzouvalis	Vice President & Director President	44	February 14, 2005 October 5, 2006
Ron Lizée	Chief Financial Officer & Director	51	June 4, 2004
Dr. Manos Topoglidis	Chief Technology Officer and Director	36	February 14, 2006
Dr. Evan Manolis	Director Chairman	50	May 8, 2007 September 2, 2008

As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2010.

~~Family~~Disclosure ~~Relationships~~controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~There~~Based ~~are~~on nothis ~~family~~evaluation, ~~relationships~~these ~~between~~officers ~~any~~concluded ~~director~~that oras of ~~executive~~December ~~officer~~31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures were due to material weaknesses described below.

~~Certain~~Management’s ~~Significant~~Report ~~Employees~~on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

AsOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the ~~date~~Securities ofExchange ~~this~~Act ~~annual~~of ~~report,~~1934) for our ~~significant~~company. Our internal ~~employees,~~control ~~their~~over ~~age~~financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance, not ~~positions~~absolute ~~held~~assurance, regarding the reliability of financial reporting and ~~duration~~the preparation of ~~such~~financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as ~~follows:~~necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Name	Position Held with our Company	Age	Date First Appointed
Kailash C. Sharma	Scientific Advisory Board	55	September 2, 2008
Constantine Poulios	General Manager(1)	38	April 1, 2007

~~(1)Mr~~Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. ~~Poulios~~A ~~was~~control ~~previously~~system, ~~President~~no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of ~~our~~the control system are met. Further, ~~company~~the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and ~~resigned~~the onbenefits ~~October~~of 5controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, ~~2006~~no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake.

~~Business~~Our ~~Experience~~management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officers, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control —Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, our management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2010.

~~The~~- ~~following~~27 is a brief account of the education and business experience of directors, executive officers and significant employees during at least the past five years, indicating their principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which they were employed. -

~~Platon~~Weaknesses ~~Tzouvalis~~Identified ~~– President and Director~~

~~Platon~~Management Tzouvalis, M.Sc., was appointed as our Vice President on February 14, 2006 and subsequently as the President on October 5, 2006. As a Biochemist and ex-Abbott Laboratories Associate, he is an experienced pharmaceutical industry professional. He has ~~been~~identified amaterial ~~member~~weaknesses ofin our ~~company’s~~internal ~~Scientific~~control ~~Advisory~~over ~~Board~~financial ~~since~~reporting ~~May~~primarily ~~2004. His expertise lies~~ in the ~~areas~~following of Quality Control, Operational Procedures as well as Pharmaceutical Product and Process Improvement. He received his B.Sc. Degree in Biochemistry from the University of Illinois in 1990 and his Master's Degree in the same field from DePaul University at Chicago in 1995. areas:

-Our 27company’s -accounting staff does not have sufficient technical accounting knowledge relating to accounting for income taxes and complex US GAAP matters. Management corrected any errors prior to the release of our company’s December 31, 2010 financial statements.

~~Mr.~~Because ~~Tzouvalis'~~of ~~earlier~~the ~~career~~inherent ~~includes~~limitations ~~working~~in asour atechnical ~~Research~~accounting ~~Chemist~~knowledge inof ~~collaboration~~US ~~with~~GAAP, ~~the~~no ~~University~~evaluation of ~~Illinois~~controls atcan ~~Chicago,~~provide ~~holding~~absolute ~~the~~assurance ~~position~~that ofall ~~Research~~control ~~and~~issues, ~~Development~~if ~~Chemist at SynQuest~~any, ~~Inc.~~within ~~and~~our ascompany ~~Advanced Quality~~have ~~Assurance~~been ~~Specialist~~detected. ofThese inherent ~~Organic~~limitations ~~Operations~~include ~~and~~the ~~then~~realities ~~Project~~that ~~Manager~~judgments in ~~Bioanalytical~~ ~~Quality~~decision-making ~~Assurance for Abbott Laboratories. Mr. Tzouvalis has also~~can ~~been~~be ~~awarded~~faulty ~~with~~and ~~the~~that ~~Abbott~~breakdowns ~~Diagnostics~~can ~~Division~~occur ~~Science~~because ~~Award~~ of ~~2002~~simple aserror ~~part of~~or ~~the Organic Operation Remediation Team~~mistake.

We ~~believe~~intend ~~Mr. Tzouvalis is qualified~~ to ~~serve~~engage onthe ~~our~~services ~~board~~ of ~~directors~~ ~~because~~an ofindependent ~~his knowledge of our company’s history and current~~consultant ~~operations,~~with ~~which~~sufficient heexpertise ~~gained~~in ~~from~~complex ~~working~~US ~~for~~GAAP ~~our~~matters ~~company~~to asassist ~~described~~us ~~above,~~ in the ~~addition~~preparation toof ~~his~~our ~~education~~financial ~~and~~statements ~~business~~by ~~experiences~~December as31, ~~described above~~2012.

~~Ron~~Changes ~~Lizée~~in –Internal ~~Chief~~Control ~~Financial~~over ~~Officer and Director~~ Financial Reporting

InThere ~~June~~were ~~2004~~no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter ended December 31, ~~Ron~~2010 ~~Lizée~~that ~~was~~have ~~appointed~~materially affected, asor aare ~~director~~reasonably oflikely to materially affect our ~~company~~ ~~and~~internal ~~Chief~~control over ~~Financial~~financial ~~Officer~~reporting.

~~Mr.~~ITEM ~~Lizée~~9B isOTHER the owner/operator of Lizée Gauthier, Certified General Accountants where he has practiced since 1982. Mr. Lizée has over 27 years experience in the fields of Taxation, Accounting and Auditing. He graduated from the University of Saskatchewan, Canada in 1981 with a B. Comm., majoring in Accounting and gained his Certified General Accountant (CGA) designation in 1987, and Certified Financial Planner (CFP) designation in 1993. Mr. Lizée has experience in financial management within public companies having served as a director and Chief Financial Officer during 1995 to 1999. He is also a director and CFO of PreAxia Health Care System Inc. a OTCBB public company. He is the former owner and Chief Executive Officer of a franchise chain operating in several Canadian provinces. Mr. Lizée is also the CEO and President of Gemstar Capital Properties Inc., a private corporation, which is involved in Land and Building Development Projects. INFORMATION

WeOn ~~believe~~February ~~Mr.~~14, ~~Lizée~~2011, iswe ~~qualified~~entered tointo ~~serve~~a ondebt ~~our~~agreement ~~board of~~with ~~directors~~Asher ~~because~~Enterprises, ofInc. ~~his~~in ~~knowledge~~exchange offor ~~our~~$53,000 ~~company’s~~in ~~history~~cash ~~and~~financing ~~current~~maturing on ~~operations~~November 16, ~~which~~2011. heThe ~~gained~~convertible ~~from~~note ~~working~~accrues ~~for~~interest ~~our~~at ~~company~~a asrate ~~described~~of ~~above,~~8% inper ~~addition~~annum to ~~his~~maturity ~~education~~ and ~~business~~22% ~~experiences~~thereafter. asThe ~~described~~note ~~above~~is convertible at 61% of the closing price of the common shares on the day prior to the conversion date.

DrOn April 18, 2011, we received a demand letter with respect to a convertible promissory note dated February 14, 2011 issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc. ~~Evan~~in ~~Manolis~~the –principal ~~Chairman~~amount of $53,000 bearing a per annum interest rate of 8%. The letter stated that the convertible promissory note provides that we would be in default if we fail to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on this, the letter stated that we were in default under the convertible promissory note and demanded ~~Director~~the immediate payment as provided in the convertible promissory note of $79,500 together with default interest as provided in the convertible promissory note. The letter stated that Asher Enterprises, Inc. would consider waiving this default, provided that we immediately become current in our filing obligations. Asher Enterprises, Inc. agreed to postpone the demand for payment, as long as we provided them the periodic status of our reporting requirements.

~~Dr.~~On ~~Manolis~~February ~~was~~2, ~~appointed~~2012, athe ~~director~~board ofreceived ~~our~~a ~~company~~Notice onof ~~May 8,~~Resignation ~~2007.~~from Dr. ~~Manolis~~Manos ~~received~~Topoglidis ~~his~~to ~~B.S.~~be ~~from~~effective ~~the~~March ~~University~~1, of2012. ~~Illinois~~Effective atMarch ~~Chicago~~1, in2012, ~~1987~~Dr. ~~and~~Manos ~~his~~Topoglidis ~~M.D.~~ceased into ~~surgery~~be ~~from~~our ~~Southern~~Chief ~~Illinois~~Technology ~~University~~Officer ~~Medical School~~and indirector. ~~1991~~Dr. HeTopoglidis’s ~~received~~resignation ~~extensive~~was ~~postgraduate~~not ~~training~~as ina ~~general~~result ~~surgery internship~~of ~~and~~any ~~residency~~disagreements with ~~from~~our ~~the~~company ~~Medical~~on ~~College~~any inmatter ~~Ohio.~~relating ~~Dr.~~to ~~Manolis~~our ~~practices surgery in Chicago and Orland Park~~operations, ~~Illinois~~policies ~~and has been in the profession for~~or ~~seventeen years~~practices.

We- ~~believe~~28 Dr. Manolis is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his knowledge of our company’s history and current operations, which he gained from working for our company as described above, in addition to his education and business experiences as described above.-

~~Dr.~~PART ~~Manos Topoglidis – Chief Technology Officer and Director~~ III

~~Dr.~~ITEM ~~Topoglidis~~10 ~~was appointed as Chief Technology Officer~~DIRECTORS, asEXECUTIVE ~~a director~~OFFICERS ofAND ~~our company and to the Scientific Advisory Board on February 24,~~CORPORATE 2006. He received his Bachelor’s of Science from King’s College (University of London) in 1996, his MSc in Biochemistry from Imperial College in London, UK in 1997 and his Ph.D. in Chemistry (Biosensors and Nanomaterials) from Imperial College in London, UK in 2001. His research interests and expertise lie in the areas of Biosensors, Nanomaterials, Biotechnology and Nanotechnology. He has worked in research at the Center of Electronic Materials and Devices of Imperial College in London, UK and as manager of European and National programs of the MESL laboratory of the National Centre for Scientific Research, Demokritos in Athens. He is a member of the Electrochemical and British Biochemical Societies. Dr. Topoglidis has 15 scientific publications during his eight years of research and has presented his work in ten U.S./international conferences. GOVERNANCE

-Directors 28and -Executive Officers

~~Dr.~~Our ~~Topoglidis~~directors ~~has~~and ~~impressive~~executive ~~experience~~officers, ~~leading~~their ~~international research~~age, ~~teams in academia to unlock nanotechnology solutions. He ranks among~~positions ~~the~~held, ~~first~~and toduration ~~extensively research the use~~ of ~~nanoporous~~such, ~~surfaces~~are ~~for~~as ~~biosensing applications and has written numerous original nanotechnology-related publications which have been cited worldwide.~~ follows:

We believe Dr. Topoglidis is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his knowledge of our company’s history and current operations, which he gained from working for our company as described above, in addition to his education and business experiences as described above.

Name	Position Held with our Company	Age	Date First Elected or Appointed
Platon Tzouvalis	Director President	46	February 14, 2005 October 5, 2006
Ron Lizée	Chief Financial Officer & Director	52	June 4, 2004
Dr. Evan Manolis	Director Chairman	53	May 8, 2007 September 2, 2008

~~Dr.~~Business ~~Kailash~~Experience ~~C. Sharma – Scientific Advisory Board~~

~~Dr.~~The ~~Sharma~~following ~~was~~is ~~appointed as~~ a ~~member~~brief account of the ~~Scientific~~education ~~Advisory Board~~and ~~in July of 2008. Dr. Sharma has over 25 years of clinical~~ business experience ~~in the areas~~ of ~~Pulmonary~~directors and ~~Internal~~executive ~~medicine.~~officers Heduring isat aleast ~~medical graduate from~~ the ~~University~~ ofpast ~~Delhi~~five years, ~~India,~~indicating ~~1981,~~their ~~received~~principal ~~his~~occupation ~~fellowships~~during to the ~~Royal~~period, ~~College of Physicians in Ireland~~ and the UKname ~~in 1985~~ and ~~is ABIM certified in the USA for~~ ~~Internal~~principal ~~Medicine,~~business ~~Pulmonary~~of ~~Diseases and Critical Care Medicine with 13 publications to his credit. Dr. Sharma is currently a practicing physician in~~ the ~~areas~~organization ofby ~~Pulmonary/critical~~which ~~care~~they inwere ~~the Chicago area~~employed.

~~Involvement~~Platon inTzouvalis ~~Certain~~– ~~Legal~~President ~~Proceedings~~and Director

~~Our~~Platon ~~directors~~Tzouvalis, ~~executive~~M.Sc., ~~officers~~was appointed as our Vice President on February 14, or2006 ~~control~~and ~~persons~~subsequently ~~have~~as ~~not~~the President on October 5, 2006. As a Biochemist and ex-Abbott Laboratories Associate, he is an experienced pharmaceutical industry professional. He has been ~~involved~~a member of our company’s Scientific Advisory Board since May 2004. His expertise lies in ~~any~~the areas of Quality Control, Operational Procedures as well as Pharmaceutical Product and Process Improvement. He received his B.Sc. Degree in Biochemistry from the University ~~following~~of ~~events~~Illinois ~~during~~in 1990 and his Master’s Degree in the ~~past~~same ~~ten~~field ~~years:~~from DePaul University at Chicago in 1995.

1Mr. ~~any~~Tzouvalis’ ~~bankruptcy~~earlier ~~petition~~career ~~filed~~includes byworking oras ~~against any business of which such person was~~ a ~~general~~Research Chemist ~~partner~~in orcollaboration ~~executive~~with ~~officer either at~~ the ~~time~~University of ~~the~~Illinois ~~bankruptcy~~at or within two years prior to that time; 2. any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences); 3. being subject to any orderChicago, ~~judgment,~~holding orthe position ~~decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated,~~ of ~~any~~Research ~~court~~and ofDevelopment ~~competent~~Chemist ~~jurisdiction,~~at ~~permanently or temporarily enjoining~~SynQuest, ~~barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or 4~~Inc. ~~being~~and ~~found~~as byAdvanced Quality aAssurance ~~court~~Specialist of ~~competent~~Organic ~~jurisdiction~~Operations ~~(in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law,~~ and ~~the~~then ~~judgment~~Project ~~has~~Manager ~~not~~in Bioanalytical ~~been~~Quality ~~reversed,~~Assurance ~~suspended,~~for orAbbott ~~vacated~~Laboratories. 5Mr. ~~being~~Tzouvalis ~~the~~has ~~subject~~also been ~~of,~~awarded or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: (i) any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with ~~any business entity; or 6. being~~ the ~~subject~~Abbott ~~of,~~Diagnostics orDivision aScience ~~party~~Award ~~to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated,~~ of ~~any~~2002 ~~self-regulatory organization (~~as ~~defined in Section 3(a)(26)~~ part of the ~~Securities~~Organic ~~Exchange~~Operation ~~Act~~Remediation of 1934), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a memberTeam.

-We 29believe -Mr. Tzouvalis is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his knowledge of our company’s history and current operations, which he gained from working for our company as described above, in addition to his education and business experiences as described above.

~~Section~~Ron ~~16(a)~~Lizée ~~Beneficial~~– ~~Ownership~~Chief ~~Compliance~~ Financial Officer and Director

~~Section~~In ~~16(a)~~June ~~of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors~~2004, ~~and~~Ron ~~persons~~Lizée ~~who~~was ~~own~~appointed ~~more~~as ~~than~~a ~~10%~~director of our ~~common~~company ~~stock, to file reports regarding ownership of,~~ and ~~transactions~~Chief ~~in,~~Financial ~~our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings~~Officer. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with, with the exception of the following:

Name	Number of Late Reports	Number of Transactions Not Reported on a Timely Basis	Failure to File Requested Forms
Platon Tzouvalis	1	Nil	Nil
Ron Lizée	Nil	Nil	Nil
Dr. Manos Topoglidis	1	Nil	Nil
Dr. Evan Manolis	3	3	Nil

Mr. Lizée is the owner/operator of Lizée Gauthier, Certified General Accountants where he has practiced since 1982. Mr. Lizée has over 29 years experience in the fields of Taxation, Accounting and Auditing. He graduated from the University of Saskatchewan, Canada in 1981 with a B. Comm., majoring in Accounting and gained his Certified General Accountant (CGA) designation in 1987, and Certified Financial Planner (CFP) designation in 1993. Mr. Lizée has experience in financial management within public companies having served as a director and Chief Financial Officer during 1995 to 1999. He is also a director and CFO of PreAxia Health Care Payment Systems Inc. a OTCBB public company. He is the former owner and Chief Executive Officer of a franchise chain operating in several Canadian provinces. Mr. Lizée is also the CEO and President of Gemstar Capital Properties Inc., a private corporation, which is involved in Land and Building Development Projects.

~~Code~~- of29 ~~Ethics~~ -

We ~~have~~believe ~~not~~Mr. ~~yet~~Lizée ~~adopted~~is aqualified ~~Code~~to serve on our board of directors ~~Ethics~~because ~~but~~of ~~intend~~his toknowledge doof soour company’s history and current operations, which he gained from working for our company as described above, in ~~the~~addition ~~near~~to ~~future~~his education and business experiences as described above.

~~Nominating~~Dr. ~~Committee~~Evan Manolis – Chairman and Director

WeDr. doManolis ~~not~~was ~~have~~appointed a ~~Nominating~~director ~~Committee,~~of our ~~entire~~company ~~board~~on ofMay 8, ~~director~~2007. ~~performs~~Dr. Manolis received his B.S. from the ~~functions~~University of aIllinois ~~Nominating~~at ~~Committee~~Chicago in 1987 and ~~oversees~~his ~~the~~M.D. in surgery from Southern Illinois University Medical School ~~process~~in by1991. ~~which~~He ~~individuals~~received ~~may~~extensive bepostgraduate ~~nominated~~training toin ~~our~~general ~~board~~surgery internship ofand ~~directors~~residency from the Medical College in Ohio. Dr. Manolis practices surgery in Chicago and Orland Park, Illinois and has been in the profession for eighteen years.

~~The~~We ~~current~~believe ~~size~~Dr. ofManolis is qualified to serve on our board of directors ~~does~~because ~~not~~of ~~facilitate the~~his ~~establishment~~knowledge of aour ~~separate~~company’s ~~committee.~~history Weand ~~hope~~current operations, towhich ~~establish~~he agained ~~separate Nominating~~from ~~Committee~~working ~~consisting~~for ofour ~~independent~~company ~~directors~~as described above, ifin addition ~~the~~to ~~number~~his ofeducation ~~our directors~~and isbusiness ~~expanded.~~experiences as described above.

~~Compensation~~Term ~~Committee~~of Office

WeEach dodirector ~~not~~of ~~have~~our acompany ~~Compensation~~is ~~Committee~~to serve until his successor is elected and qualified or until his death, resignation or removal. Each officer of our company is to hold office at the pleasure of our board of directors and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until his death, resignation or removal.

~~Audit~~Family ~~Committee~~Relationships ~~and Audit Committee Financial Expert~~

WeThere ~~currently~~are dono ~~not~~family ~~have~~relationships anbetween ~~audit~~any ~~committee.~~director ~~During the year~~or ~~ended~~executive December 31, 2009, our board of directors performed some of the same functions of an audit committee, such as: recommending a firm of independent certified public accountants to audit our annual financial statements; reviewing the independent auditors’ independence, the financial statements and their audit report; and reviewing management’s administration of our system of internal accounting controlsofficer.

~~Our~~Involvement ~~board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of the audit committee that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined~~ in ~~Item~~Certain ~~407(d)(5)(ii)~~Legal ofProceedings ~~Regulation S-K.~~

WeOur ~~believe that our entire board of~~ directors ~~is capable of analyzing~~ and ~~evaluating~~executive ~~financial~~officers ~~statements~~have ~~that~~not ~~present~~been ainvolved ~~breadth and level~~in ofany ~~complexity~~ of ~~accounting issues that are generally comparable to~~ the ~~breadth and~~following ~~complexity~~events ofduring the ~~issues~~past ~~reasonably~~ten ~~expected~~years: to be raised by our company. In addition, our board of directors constantly consults with the financial advisor. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated revenues to date.

-1. 30any -bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

- 30 -

	2.	any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

	3.	being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures

	4.	Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

	5.	being the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: (i) any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

	6.	being the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, all filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with, with the exception of the following:

Name	Number of Late Reports	Number of Transactions Not Reported on a Timely Basis	Failure to File Requested Forms
Dr. Evan Manolis	Nil	1	1

Code of Ethics

We have not yet adopted a Code of Ethics but intend to do so in the near future.

Nominating Committee

We do not have a nominating committee, our entire board of director performs the functions of a Nominating Committee and oversees the process by which individuals may be nominated to our board of directors.

The current size of our board of directors does not facilitate the establishment of a separate committee. We hope to establish a separate Nominating Committee consisting of independent directors, if the number of our directors is expanded.

Compensation Committee

We do not have a compensation committee.

- 31 -

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

We currently do not have an audit committee. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our board of directors performed some of the same functions of an audit committee, such as: recommending a firm of independent certified public accountants to audit our annual financial statements; reviewing the independent auditors’ independence, the financial statements and their audit report; and reviewing management’s administration of our system of internal accounting controls.

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of the audit committee that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

We believe that our entire board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues reasonably expected to be raised by our company. In addition, our board of directors constantly consults with the financial advisor. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated revenues to date.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation

The particulars of compensation paid to the following persons:

(a) our principal executive officer; (b) each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 who had total compensation exceeding $100,000; and (c) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the most recently completed financial year,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers, of our years ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and, ~~2008~~2009, are set out in the following summary compensation table.

Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock awards($)	Option awards ($)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)	Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)	All other compensation ($)	Total ($)
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE – YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock awards ($)	Option awards ($)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)	Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)	All other compensation ($)	Total ($)
Platon Tzouvalis(1)	2009 2008	84,000 84,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	84,000 84,000
Platon Tzouvalis	2010 2009	84,000 84,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	84,000 84,000
Ron Lizée	~~2009~~2010 ~~2008~~2009	8161,~~215~~271 8581,~~244~~215	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	8161,~~215~~271 8581,~~244~~215
Dr. Manos Topoglidis	~~2009~~2010 ~~2008~~2009	54,000 54,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	54,000 54,000
Dr. Evan Manolis(2)	2009 2008	20,000 Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	20,000 Nil

(Our employment agreement with our President, Mr. Platon Tzouvalis, dated April 1), 2007 was renewed over the years till March 31, 2011. Mr. Platon Tzouvalis agreed to serve as our President and ~~Manos~~was ~~Topoglidis~~obligated ~~commenced~~to perform ~~employment~~his ~~April~~duties and responsibilities in good faith and on a best efforts basis. In consideration for his services, ~~2007~~we ~~(2)~~paid ~~Evan~~him ~~Manolis~~a ismonthly ~~chairman~~salary of $7,000. ~~the~~We also compensated Mr. Platon Tzouvalis for any expenses he incurred in carrying out his duties. On March 31, 2011, this employment contract was terminated by mutual consent. Mr. Platon Tzouvalis still acts as our President. The board is in the process of reviewing a new compensation package based on shares and fees.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of December 31 2009.

- 31 -

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDS						STOCK AWARDS
Name (a)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable (b)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (c)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (d)	Option Exercise Price ($) (e)	Option Expiration Date (f)	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (g)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Have Vested ($) (h)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Not HaveVested (#) (i)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Not Vested (#) (j)
Dr. Dimitri Goundis Former	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Platon Tzouvalis	187,500 600,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	0.50 1.00	Feb 12, 2017 Mar 22, 2012	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil
Ron Lizée	112,500 100,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	0.50 2.50	Feb 12, 2017 May 3, 2016	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil
Dr. Manos Topoglidis	150,000	Nil	Nil	0.50	Feb 12, 2017	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil

(1) Dr. Goundis resigned as our Chief Executive Officer on September 2, 2008

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information concerning option exercises and stock vested as of December 31 2009.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS Name (a) Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) (b) Value Realized on Exercise ($) (c) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (d) Value Realized on Vesting ($) (e) Dr. Dimitri Goundis Nil Nil Nil Nil Platon Tzouvalis Nil Nil Nil Nil Ron Lizée Nil Nil Nil Nil Dr. Manos Topoglidis Nil Nil Nil Nil

- 32 -

Our employment agreement with our Chief Technology Officer, Dr. Manos Topoglidis, dated April 1, 2007 was renewed and was for a term of three years ending March 31, 2011. Dr. Manos Topoglidis agreed to serve as our Chief Technology Officer and was obligated to perform his duties and responsibilities in good faith and on a best efforts basis. In consideration for his services, we paid him a monthly salary of $4,500. We also compensated Dr. Manos Topoglidis for any expenses he incurred in carrying out his duties. On March 31, 2011, this employment agreement was terminated. On February 2, 2012, the board received a Notice of Resignation from Dr. Manos Topoglidis to be effective March 1, 2012. Effective March 1, 2012, Dr. Manos Topoglidis ceased to be our Chief Technology Officer and director. Our director and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Ron Lizée has been with us since June of 2004 and is not on a contract. His professional accounting firm invoices our company monthly at the same billable rate as other clients.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2010.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDS						STOCK AWARDS
Name (a)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable (b)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (c)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (d)	Option Exercise Price ($) (e)	Option Expiration Date (f)	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (g)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Have Vested ($) (h)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Not Have Vested (#) (i)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Not Vested (#) (j)
Platon Tzouvalis	250,000 600,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	0.50 1.00	Feb 12, 2017 Mar 22, 2012	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil
Ron Lizée	150,000 100,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	0.50 2.50	Feb 12, 2017 May 3, 2016	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	Nil Nil
Dr. Manos Topoglidis	200,000	Nil	Nil	0.50	Feb 12, 2017	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil

Compensation of Directors

Our directors may be paid for their expenses incurred in attending each meeting of the directors. In addition to expenses, our directors may be paid a sum for attending each meeting of the directors or may receive a stated salary as director. No payment precludes any director from serving our company in any other capacity and being compensated for such service. Members of special or standing committees may be allowed similar reimbursement and compensation for attending committee meetings.

We reimburse our directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending board meetings, but did not pay directors’ fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director in the ~~periods~~year ended December 31, ~~2009 and 2008~~ 2010.

~~Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards ($) Option Awards ($) Non~~-~~Equity~~ ~~Incentive~~33 Plan Compensation ($) Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) All Other Compensation ($) Total ($) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Platon Tzouvalis Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Ron Lizée Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Dr. Manos Topoglidis Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Dr. Evan Manolis Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil-

Long-Term Incentive Plans

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Platon Tzouvalis	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Ron Lizée	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Dr. Manos Topoglidis	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Dr. Evan Manolis	Nil	Nil	$50,000¹	Nil	Nil	Nil	$50,000

¹On June 1, 2010, we granted 1,200,000 options to Dr. Evan Manolis, a director of our company, for the services rendered. The options vest on a graded vesting schedule whereby 25% of the options vest 3 months after the grant date and every 3 months thereafter until fully vested. They have an exercise price of $0.50 per share and are exercisable for a period of 8 years from the date of grant., Subsequent to this grant, the Company determined it was unauthorized as the number of options then outstanding exceeded the amount allowable under our stock option plan. Therefore, the Company amended this award by reducing the amount of options awarded to 500,000 in order to comply with the plan. As of December 31, 2010, Dr. Manolis had 500,000 options outstanding.

Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers, except that our directors and executive officers may receive stock options at the discretion of our board of directors. We do not have any material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of our board of directors.

WeResignation, ~~have~~Retirement, noOther ~~plans~~Termination, or ~~arrangements~~Change in ~~respect of remuneration~~ ~~received~~Control orArrangements that may be received by our executive officers to compensate such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control) or a change of responsibilities following a change of control, where the value of such compensation exceeds $60,000 per executive officer.

We have no contract, agreement, plan or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that provides for payments to our directors or executive officers at, following, or in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination of our directors or executive officers, or a change in control of our company or a change in our directors’ or executive officers’ responsibilities following a change in control.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

We have no long-term incentive plans.

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our equity compensation plan as at December 31, 2009:

- 33 -

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights	Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights	Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	2,100,000	$0.86	500,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	Nil	Nil	Nil
Total	2,100,000	$0.86	500,000

Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management

In the following ~~tables~~table, we have determined the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on information provided to us by our controlling shareholder, executive officers and directors, and this information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. In determining the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we include any shares as to which the person has sole or shared voting power or investment power, as well as any shares subject to warrants or options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days.

Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management

The security ownership of individuals known to us who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock and of our management is set forth in the following table.

(1) Title of class	(2) Name and address of beneficial owner	(3) Amount and nature of beneficial ownership	(4) Percent of class 1
common stock	Ron Lizée c/o Lizeé Gauthier CGA 202-3550 Taylor St. East Saskatoon, SK Canada S7H 5H9	600,000 2 Direct	2.3%
common stock	Evan T. Manolis 15300 West Ave, Suite 310 Orland Park, IL 60462	225,993 Direct	0.9%
common stock	Manos Topoglidis Panagi Tsaldari 5 Marcousi Athens Greece 15122	600,000 3 Direct	2.3%
common stock	Platon Tzouvalis 4 Isminis St. Chalandri Athens, Greece 15232	1,600,000 4 Direct	6.2%
Total	Directors and Officers as a Group (4)	3,025,993	11.8%
5% Stockholders
common stock	Platon Tzouvalis 4 Isminis St. Chalandri Athens, Greece 15232	1,600,000 4 Direct	6.2%

- 34 -

1 Percentage of ownership is based on 25,580,481 common shares issued as of April 7, 2010. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such option or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. 2 Includes 350,000 shares of common stock and 250,000 stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 7, 2010. 3 Includes 400,000 shares of common stock and 200,000 stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 7, 2010.4 Includes 750,000 shares of common stock and 850,000 stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 7, 2010.

Title of class	Name and address of beneficial owner	Amount and nature of beneficial ownership	Percent of class ¹
Management
common stock	Ron Lizée c/o Lizeé Gauthier CGA 202-3550 Taylor St. East Saskatoon, SK Canada S7H 5H9	600,000 ²Direct	2.1%
common stock	Evan T. Manolis 15300 West Ave, Suite 310 Orland Park, IL 60462	725,993 ³Direct	2.5%
common stock	Platon Tzouvalis 4 Isminis St. Chalandri Athens, Greece 15232	1,600,000 ⁴Direct	5.5%
common stock	Manos Topoglidis⁵ Panagi Tsaldari 5 Marcousi Athens Greece 15122	600,000 ⁶Direct	2.1%
Total	Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (3)	2,925,993	10.1%
5% Stockholders
common stock	Platon Tzouvalis 4 Isminis St. Chalandri Athens, Greece 15232	1,600,000 ⁴Direct	5.5%
common stock	Elias Margellos 74 Konstadinoupoleos St 16232 Vironas Greece	2,120,000 Direct	7.3%

¹Percentage of ownership is based on 28,858,481 common shares issued as of March 12, 2012. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such option or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
²Includes 350,000 shares of common stock and 250,000 stock options exercisable within 60 days.
³Includes 225,993 shares of common stock and 500,000 stock options exercisable within 60 days.
⁴Includes 750,000 shares of common stock and 850,000 stock options exercisable within 60 days.
⁵Effective March 1, 2012, Dr. Manos Topoglidis ceased to be our Chief Technology Officer and director.
⁶Includes 400,000 shares of common stock and 200,000 stock options exercisable within 60 days.

Changes in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company.

Transactions with related persons

Except as ~~described~~disclosed below, ~~none~~since ofJanuary ~~the~~1, ~~following~~2009, ~~parties~~there ~~has,~~have ~~since~~been ~~our~~no ~~date of incorporation~~transactions, ~~had~~or ~~any~~currently ~~material~~proposed ~~interest~~transactions, ~~direct~~in which we were or are ~~indirect~~to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 inor ~~any~~one ~~transaction~~percent ~~with~~of usthe oraverage inof ~~any~~our ~~presently~~total ~~proposed~~assets ~~transaction~~at ~~that~~year ~~has~~end ~~or will~~for ~~materially~~the ~~affect~~last ustwo completed fiscal years, ~~other~~and ~~than~~in aswhich ~~noted~~any inof ~~this~~the ~~section~~following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

(i) any of our directors or officers; (ii) any person proposed as a nominee for election as a director; (iii) any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock; (iv) any of our promoters; and (v) any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in- laws) of any of the foregoing persons.

1. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, a total of $81,215 in fees was billed to us by Lizée Gauthier Certified General Accountants, of which our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Lizée, is the proprietor. These fees were invoiced at the same billable rate as other clients of the firm. As at December 31, 2009 $54,936 of the $81,215 was payable to Mr. Lizée. 2. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we issued 350,000 shares to our Chief Financial Officer for past services for a value calculated at $133,500. No shares were issued for the year ended December 31, 2009. 3. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we issued 750,000 shares to our President for past services of which $533,250 was recorded in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and $59,250 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, we also incurred consulting fees to the President of $84,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2008: $84,000). As at December 31, 2009 $84,000 was payable. 4. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we issued 400,000 shares to our Scientific Advisor of which the value of $284,400 was recorded in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and $31,600 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. In addition we also incurred consulting fees of $54,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2008: $54,000) as at December 31, 2009 $56,101 was payable.

- 35 -

	(i)	any director or executive officer of our company;

	(ii)	any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock;

	(iii)	any of our promoters and control persons; and

	(iv)	Any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in- laws) of any of the foregoing persons.

	1.	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, a total of $61,271 (2009: $81,215) in fees was billed to us by Lizée Gauthier Certified General Accountants, of which our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Lizée, is the proprietor. These fees were invoiced at the same billable rate as other clients of the firm. As at December 31, 2010 $109,816 was payable to Mr. Lizée.

	2.	We also incurred consulting fees to the President of $90,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009: $84,000). As at December 31, 2010 $174,000 was payable to our President.

	3.	During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred consulting fees to Dr. Manos Topoglidis, our former Chief Technology Officer, of $54,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009: $54,000) as at December 31, 2010 $110,101 was payable.

	4.	During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred consulting fees to director of $Nil (2009: $20,000). As at December 31, 2010, $Nil was payable to the director.

Our consulting agreement with our former President, Mr. Constantine Poulios, dated April 1, 2008 was renewed and was for a term of three years ending March 31, 2011. Mr. Constantine Poulios agreed to serve as an outside independent advisor on all issues as our board of directors may need from time to time. Mr. Constantine Poulios had the obligation to serve our company in good faith and on a best efforts basis. In consideration for his services, we paid him a monthly fee of $10,000. We also compensated Mr. Constantine Poulios for any expenses he incurred in carrying out his duties. Further, in consideration of Mr. Constantine Poulios signing the original consulting agreement dated April 1, 2008, we re-priced 100,000 options exercisable at $2.50 to an exercise price of $0.50 and granted an additional 200,000 options at an exercise price of $0.50. On March 31, 2011, the consulting agreement was terminated by mutual consent. Mr. Poulios still assists the company on an “as needed” basis.

Employment Contracts

~~Other~~For ~~than~~information asregarding ~~described~~compensation ~~below,~~for weour ~~are not party to any~~executive ~~employment~~officers ~~contracts~~and ~~with~~directors, ~~our~~see ~~directors~~“Item ~~and~~11. ~~officers:~~Executive Compensation”.

We- ~~have~~36 employment contracts with Mr. Platon Tzouvalis, our President and Dr. Manos Topoglidis, our Chief Technology Officer. Their agreements were recently renewed and expire on March 31, 2013 and they are described in detail under the heading “Item 1. Business – Employees and Consultants”.-

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, for the years ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009:

Fees		~~2009~~2010		~~2008~~2009
Audit Fees	$	68106,~~661~~919	$	~~102~~68,~~236~~661
Audit related Fees		Nil		Nil
Tax fees		63,~~371~~293		~~Nil~~6,371
Other fees		Nil		Nil
Total Fees	$	75110,~~032~~212	$	~~102~~75,~~236~~032

Audit Fees. Consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and related comfort letters and other services that are normally provided by BDO Canada LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Tax Fees. Consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local tax compliance and consultation in connection with various transactions and acquisitions.

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Auditors

WeOur doentire ~~not~~board ~~use~~of ~~BDO~~directors ~~Canada~~pre-approves ~~LLP,~~all ~~for financial information system design and implementation. These~~ services~~, which include designing or~~ ~~implementing~~provided aby ~~system~~our ~~that~~independent ~~aggregates~~auditors. ~~source~~All ~~data~~of ~~underlying~~ the ~~financial statements~~above orservices ~~generates~~and ~~information~~fees ~~that is significant to our financial~~were ~~statements,~~reviewed ~~are~~and ~~provided~~approved ~~internally or~~ by ~~other~~our ~~service~~board ~~providers.~~of Wedirectors dobefore ~~not engage~~the ~~BDO~~respective ~~Canada LLP to provide compliance outsourcing~~ services were rendered.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before BDO Canada LLP is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

approved by our audit committee (the functions of which are performed by our entire board of directors); or

entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the board of directors, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the board of directors is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the board of directors' responsibilities to management.

- 36 -

Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by our sole director either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors have considered the nature and amount of fees billed by BDO Canada LLP and believe that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining BDO Canada LLP’s independence.

- 37 -

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

Exhibit No.	Document Name
(3)	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our registration statement on Form 10-SB filed on May 24, 2002, as amended)
3.2	Bylaws, as amended (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our registration statement on Form 10- SB filed on May 24, 2002, as amended)
(10)	Material Contracts
10.1	Agreement for the Sale of Stock between our company and Dr. Leftheris Georgakopoulos dated February 13, 2006 (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2006)
10.2	Development Agreement between our company and Molecular Vision Limited (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2007)
10.3	Employment Agreement dated September 3, 2007 between our company and Dr. Dimitris Goundis (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2007)
10.4	Letter Agreement dated February 1, 2008 with Molecular Vision Limited (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 2008)
10.5	Royalty Agreement dated November 13, 2008 with Molecular Vision Limited (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2008)
10.6	Supplemental Agreement to the Subscription and Shareholders’ Agreement relating to Molecular Vision Limited dated November 13, 2008 (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2008)
10.7	Option Agreement dated November 13, 2008 with Molecular Vision Limited to acquire additional 20,000 shares of Molecular Vision Limited (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2008)
10.8	Deed of Termination and Release dated November 13, 2008 with Molecular Vision Limited (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2008)
10.9	Share Exchange Agreement dated January 31, 2009 between our company, Vardisto Investments Limited and a certain shareholder of Vardisto Investments Limited (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2009)
10.10	Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 30, 2009 between Maragrita Hadzopoulou-Cladaras and Halldale Ventures Limited (~~attached~~incorporated asby reference to an exhibit to an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2009)
10.11	Promissory note dated June 12, 2008 issued to Ron and Johanne Lizée by our company (attached as our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2009)
10.12	Promissory note dated July 15, 2009 issued to Ron and Johanne Lizée by our company (attached as our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009)
10.13*	Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2007 between our company and Platon Tzouvalis
10.14*	Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2007 between our company and Manos Topoglidis
10.15*	Management and Operational Services Agreement dated October 1, 2008 between our company and Vardisto Investments Limited
(31)	Section 302 Certifications
31.1*	Section 302 Certification of Platon Tzouvalis
31.2*	Section 302 Certification of Ron Lizée
(32)	Section 906 Certifications
32.1*	Section 906 Certification of Platon Tzouvalis
32.2*	Section 906 Certification of Ron Lizée

*- ~~Filed~~38 ~~herewith.~~-

- 38 -

10.11	Promissory note dated June 12, 2008 issued to Ron and Johanne Lizée by our company (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2009)
10.12	Promissory note dated July 15, 2009 issued to Ron and Johanne Lizée by our company (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009)
10.13	Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2007 between our company and Platon Tzouvalis (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2010)
10.14	Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2007 between our company and Manos Topoglidis (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2010)
10.15	Management and Operational Services Agreement dated October 1, 2008 between our company and Vardisto Investments Limited (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10- K filed on April 15, 2010)
10.16*	Consulting Agreement dated April 1, 2008 with Constantine Poulios
10.17*	Share Exchange Agreement dated January 31, 2009 with Vardisto Investments Limited and its shareholder
10.18*	Amendment Agreement dated December 29, 2010 to the Share Exchange Agreement dated January 31, 2009 with Vardisto Investments Limited and its shareholder
10.19*	Promissory note dated December 29, 2010 issued to Inter Jura Cy (Services) Ltd.
10.20*	Convertible Promissory Note dated February 14, 2011 issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc.
(31)	Section 302 Certifications
31.1*	Section 302 Certification of Platon Tzouvalis
31.2*	Section 302 Certification of Ron Lizée
(32)	Section 906 Certifications
32.1*	Section 906 Certification of Platon Tzouvalis
32.2*	Section 906 Certification of Ron Lizée

~~SIGNATURES~~* Filed herewith.

~~Pursuant~~SIGNATURES ~~to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~

~~ACRONGENOMICS~~Pursuant ~~INC~~to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ~~By:~~

~~/s/~~ACRONGENOMICS ~~Platon Tzouvalis Platon Tzouvalis President & Director (Principal Executive Officer) Date: April 14, 2010~~INC.

~~/s/ Ron Lizée Ron Lizée Chief Financial Officer & Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Date~~By: ~~April 14, 2010~~

~~Pursuant~~/s/ toPlaton ~~the~~Tzouvalis ~~requirements~~Platon ofTzouvalis ~~the~~President ~~Securities~~& ~~Exchange~~Director ~~Act~~(Principal ~~of 1934,~~Executive ~~this~~Officer) ~~report~~Date: ~~has~~March ~~been~~12, ~~signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.~~2012

~~/s/~~Pursuant ~~Platon~~to ~~Tzouvalis~~the ~~Platon~~requirements ~~Tzouvalis~~of ~~President~~the Securities Exchange Act of &1934, ~~Director~~this ~~(Principal~~report ~~Executive~~has ~~Officer)~~been ~~Date:~~signed ~~April~~below ~~14,~~by ~~2010~~the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Platon Tzouvalis Platon Tzouvalis President & Director (Principal Executive Officer) Date: March 12, 2012 /s/ Ron Lizée Ron Lizée Chief Financial Officer & Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Date: ~~April~~March 1412, ~~2010~~2012 /s/ Dr. Evan Manolis Dr. Evan Manolis Director Date: March 12, 2012

/s/ Dr. Evan Manolis Dr. Evan Manolis Director Date: April 14, 2010

/s/ Dr. Manos Topoglidis Dr. Manos Topoglidis Director Date: April 14, 2010

- 39 -

Filing Compare · ACRONGENOMICS INC