UNITED ~~STATESSECURITIES~~STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ~~COMMISSION Washington~~COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 0R 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 0R 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ~~______________~~[ ] to [ ~~_______________~~ ]

Commission file number 000-52796

~~GURATA~~FORZA ~~GOLD,~~ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Incorporated in the State of Nevada	71-1046926
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
11730 NE 107th Place, Kirkland, Washington	98033
5927 Balfour Court, Suite 112, Carlsbad, CA	92008
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (~~206~~706) ~~779~~931-~~5013~~6789

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

common stock - $0.001 par value (Title of of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.[ ] Yes [ X ] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.[ [ ] Yes [ X ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the last 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [ X ] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such short period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[ ] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Larger accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).[ X [ ] Yes [ X] No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $97,~~350~~160,000.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at ~~November~~August 1830, ~~2009~~2010
common stock - $0.001 par value	3940,~~000~~300,000

Documents incorporated by reference: Exhibit 3.1 (Articles of of Incorporation) and Exhibit 3.2 (By-laws) both filed as exhibits to ~~Gurata~~ to Forza’s registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007; ~~Exhibit~~ Exhibit 10.1 (Property Agreement) filed as an exhibit to ~~Gurata~~Forza’s ~~registration~~ registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007; Exhibit 10.2 (Trust Agreement) filed as an exhibit to ~~Gurata~~Forza’s registration statement on ~~Form~~ Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007; and Exhibit 14 (Financial Code of Ethics) filed as an exhibit to ~~Gurata~~Forza’s registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007.

~~Gurata~~Forza ~~Gold~~Environmental Building Products, Inc. Form 10-K - ~~2009~~2010 Page 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	7

Item 2.	Description of Property	7

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	8

Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	8

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	8

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	10

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	16

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	17

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	30

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	30

Item 9B.	Other Information	32

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.	32

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	34

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	36

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	37

Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	38

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules	38

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 3

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business.

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors”, that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our company”, mean ~~Gurata~~Forza ~~Gold~~Environmental Building Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation, unless otherwise indicated.

Business Development

WeOn ~~were~~January ~~incorporated~~17, 2007, we acquired the Gate 1 Claim, a mineral claim in the ~~state~~Province of ~~Nevada~~British onColumbia. After exploring the claim we decided to change the focus of our company. As of May 2618, ~~2006. Since~~2010, our ~~incorporation~~company intends to provide environmentally sound, weenergy-efficient ~~had~~materials ~~been~~for insafe, ~~the~~sustainable shelter ~~business~~to ~~mineral~~disaster ~~exploration~~replacement housing projects around the world.

OnWe ~~January~~will ~~17,~~be ~~2007,~~immediately pursuing contractual relationships in disaster affected areas around the globe. Our immediate focus is marketing our product to the Federal City Project in Louisiana; we ~~acquired~~hope to play an integral part in the ~~Gate~~rebuilding 1effort ~~Claim,~~as a ~~mineral~~result of Katrina. We will also be pursuing a ~~claim~~contractual relationship in Haiti hoping to provide the ~~Province~~materials that will help rebuild Haiti as a result of ~~British~~the ~~Columbia~~recent earthquake. Investors must keep in mind that these are forward looking statements and contracts may never come to fruition.

~~Management~~We ~~has~~are noalso ~~previous~~targeting ~~experience~~other ~~exploring~~areas ~~for~~of ~~minerals~~the ~~or operating~~globe ato ~~mining~~include ~~company.~~the Middle ~~Even~~East, ifChina, weCentral ~~complete our current exploration program~~ and ~~are~~South ~~successful in identifying a mineral deposit~~America, weas ~~will~~well ~~have~~other toareas ~~spend substantial~~of ~~funds~~the ~~on further drilling and engineering studies before we will~~globe ~~know~~where ifdisaster weresistant ~~have~~building asystem ~~commercially~~materials ~~viable~~are ~~mineral deposit or reserve on the Gate 1 Claim~~needed.

Under the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia), title to British Columbia mineral claims can only be held by individuals or British Columbia corporations. Because of this regulation, Feliberto Gurat, our former chief financial officer, is holding the Gate 1 Claim in trust for our company until we can determine whether there is a commercially viable gold deposit on the Gate 1 Claim. If we determine that there is a commercially viable gold deposit on the Gate 1 Claim we will incorporate a British Columbia subsidiary to hold title to the Gate 1 Claim and Mr. Gurat will transfer the Gate 1 Claim to the subsidiary. The transfer will be at no cost to our company, other than the costs associated with the incorporation of the British Columbia subsidiary.

The cost of the Gate 1 Claim charged to operations by Gurata was $1,000, which represented the cost to acquire the Gate 1 Claim via a property agreement with Kenneth Ralfs. However, Gurata will incur much more significant expenses in order to explore the Gate 1 Claim as described in the Plan of Operation below.

We have no current plans to change our business activities from mineral exploration or to combine with another business. It is possible that beyond the foreseeable future that our mineral exploration efforts fail and for any potential minerals in our property, become uneconomic due to market prices for such minerals, which may require us to change our plan of operations. However, until we encounter such a situation management intends to explore for minerals in British Columbia, Canada or elsewhere.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 3

We have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings. There have been no material reclassifications, mergers, consolidations or purchases or sales of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of our business.

Corporate History

We were incorporated in the state of Nevada on May 26, 2006 under the name Gurata Gold, Inc. On July 19, 2010, we merged with our wholly owned subsidiary and changed our name to Forza Environmental Technology, Inc. Our stock symbol remains “GUGO” and our CUSIP number is 34987E105.

On July 8, 2010, we issued an aggregate of 620,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement, raising gross proceeds of US$130,000, or US$0.20 per share. On July 29, 2010, we issued 280,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement, raising gross proceeds of US$70,000, or US$0.25 per share. On August 2, 2010, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement, raising gross proceeds of US$100,000, or US$0.25 per share. We issued all of the shares to one (1) non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 4

On May 1, 2010, we entered into an executive employment agreement with Paul J. Artzer whereby Mr. Artzer will act as vice president of research development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Artzer will grant our company the exclusive universal (worldwide) right to manufacture, market and distribute the Artzer Z-Panel, described below.

We intend to provide environmentally sound, energy-efficient materials for safe, sustainable shelter to disaster replacement housing projects around the world.

Paul Artzer invented and continues to improve the Artzer Z-Panel™, recognized around the world as the industry standard in structural concrete insulated panels. These panels are earthquake resistant, resistant to hurricane and cyclonic force winds, fire resistant, resistant to water and mold damage, and termite proof. In acquiring the exclusive rights to the Artzer Z-Panel™, Forza Environmental Building Products intends to position itself to become the leader in disaster replacement and resistant housing materials.

On April 29, 2010, Shaun Davis resigned as president, secretary, treasurer, chief executive officer, chief financial officer and as a director of our company. As a result of the resignation of Mr. Davis, we appointed Charles Thompson Slay as president, secretary, chief executive officer, chief financial officer and as a director of our company.

Our Current Business

We are ana ~~exploration~~development stage company, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard “SFAS No.7 Accounting and Reporting for Development Stage Enterprises”. Our principal business is the ~~acquisition~~development ~~and exploration~~ of ~~mineral~~markets ~~resources.~~for Weenvironmentally sound, ~~have~~energy-efficient ~~not~~materials ~~generated~~for ~~any~~safe, ~~revenues~~sustainable ~~from~~shelter ~~our mineral~~to ~~exploration~~disaster ~~activities.~~replacement Wehousing ~~have~~projects ~~not~~around ~~presently determined whether~~ the ~~Gate~~ ~~1 Claim contains mineral reserves that are economically recoverable~~world.

~~We do not have any assets or mineral properties that are~~ ~~currently~~Principal inProducts ~~production or contain a reserve.~~

~~Gate~~ The 1Artzer ~~Claim~~Z-Panel system is a three-dimensional welded wire truss network, and an expanded polystyrene core, covered with cement render. The high resistant steel in the wire network, and the applied render provides exceptional reinforcement characteristics and high resistance to seismic and wind loads. The System is lightweight and reduces foundation requirements and provides insulation and results in energy savings.

In The ~~January~~Artzer ~~2007,~~Z-Panel weSystem ~~retained~~provides ~~Stephen G. Daikow,~~ a ~~member~~building ofsolution ~~the Society~~that ~~of Economic Geologists who~~ is ~~familiar~~25% ~~with~~more ~~the~~energy ~~Atlin~~efficient; ~~area,~~has ~~to develop~~ a ~~report~~ ~~about~~significantly ~~the~~shorter ~~Gate~~construction 1completion ~~Claim.~~time; ~~The~~and ~~report~~is ~~entitled~~pest ~~“Review and Recommendations~~resistant, ~~Gate~~ 1earthquake ~~Claim~~resistant, ~~Mineral~~and ~~Tenure~~wind ~~527388,~~resistant ~~Atlin~~up ~~Mining~~to ~~Division~~180 mph, ~~British~~flood ~~Columbia”~~and mold ~~dated~~resistant ~~January~~buildings ~~26,~~constructed ~~2007~~with ~~describes~~ the ~~Gate~~Artzer 1Z ~~Claim,~~Panel ~~the~~System ~~regional~~have ~~geology,~~a ~~the mineral~~lifespan ~~potential~~significantly oflonger ~~the~~than ~~Gate~~comparative 1traditional ~~Claim~~stick building and ~~recommendations~~the ~~how~~System ~~our~~presents ~~company~~greatly ~~should explore~~reduced ~~the~~Life ~~Gate~~Cycle ~~1 Claim~~Costs.

~~Among other things, the report outlines the potential economic~~ ~~significance~~Markets of the mineral claim. According to the report, the Gate 1 Claim lies in a metamorphic terrain adjacent to the Boundary Ranges of the Coast Mountains and is prospective for gold, gold-silver, massive sulphide, and, possibly, platinum group metal deposits.

~~Location~~ Our panels will be manufactured at plants located in the US and ~~Access~~Mexico and will be shipped by truck or container ship to building sites.

The Gate 1 Claim is located approximately 30 miles west of Atlin, British Columbia, Canada. The coordinates of the center of the Gate 1 Claim is at 59°38’ North and 134°32’ West. The Gate 1 Claim covers an area of 376.49 hectares (approximately 930 acres). The Gate 1 Claim is located on the north side of Fantail Lake, British Columbia.

The town of Atlin is situated on the east shore of Atlin Lake, in northern British Columbia, has a population of about 350 permanent residents and offers most services required in support of mining activities. Fantail Lake can be reached by sea plane from the town of Atlin. The Gate 1 Claim is a short hike from Fantail Lake. For convenience and practical considerations, the claim is best reached by float plane from Atlin.

Summary of the Gate 1 Claim

The Gate 1 Claim is unencumbered, is in good standing and there are no third party conditions that affect the Gate 1 Claim other than conditions defined by the Province of British Columbia described below. The Gate 1 Claim has an area of 376.49 hectares, which is equivalent to approximately 930 acres. We have has no insurance covering the Gate 1 Claim. Management believes that no insurance is necessary since the Gate 1 Claim is unimproved and contains no buildings or improvements. The tenure number, claim name, owner, good to date, status, and area as typically recorded in British Columbia is as follows:

Tenure Number	Claim Name	Owner	Good to Date	Status	Area (Hectares)
527388	Gate 1	204848 (100%)	2012/Feb/10	Good	376.49

There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on the Gate 1 Claim. Further exploration will be required before an evaluation as to the economic feasibility of the Gate 1 Claim can be determined. It is management’s intention to incorporate a British Columbia subsidiary company and record the deed of ownership in the name of the subsidiary if minerals are discovered on the Gate 1 Claim and it appears that it would be economically viable to commercially mine the Gate 1 Claim. Our consulting geological technician has written a report and provided our company with recommendations of how management should explore the Gate 1 Claim. Until we can validate otherwise, the Gate 1 Claim is without known reserves and management is planning a three phase mineral exploration program as recommended by our consulting geological technician.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 4

The Gate 1 Claim has an expiry date of February 10, 2012 and in order to maintain the tenures in good standing it will be necessary for our company to coordinate an agent to perform and record valid exploration work with value of CDN$4 per hectare in anniversary years 1, 2, and 3, and CDN$8 per hectare in subsequent years or pay the equivalent sum to the Province of British Columbia in lieu of work. Failure to perform and record valid exploration work or pay the equivalent sum to the Province of British Columbia on the anniversary dates will result in forfeiture of title to the Gate 1 Claim.

During the year ended May 31, 2008, we paid approximately $1,669 to the Province of British Columbia in lieu of exploration work on the Gate 1 Claim in order to keep the Gate 1 Claim in good standing. We also spent $13,697 on a helicopter-supported magnetic survey on the Gate 1 Claim. $12,000 of the above expenditure was registered with the Government of the Province of British Columbia on December 15, 2008 and the tenure is now in good standing until February 10, 2012.

History of Atlin and the Gate 1 Claim Area

Atlin, British Columbia has always been closely identified with the mining industry, having been established about 1900 as a supply base and winter home for miners and prospectors working in the nearby mines, prospects and placer gold fields. Placer gold fields are areas where gold is found in the gravels of a mineral claim. Placer mining continues to be an important component of the local economy and other mining ventures have become increasingly significant in recent years with several properties either in or approaching the permitting and significant financing phases. Significant mining properties that are located in the Tulesequah River valley, 200 kilometres (120 miles) south of Atlin, are in advanced stages of exploration and approval process and are best accessed from Atlin.

The Gate 1 Claim was originally staked by Kenneth Ralfs of Richmond, British Columbia in February 2006. Our company acquired the Gate Claim from Kenneth Ralfs via a property agreement dated December 15, 2006 and signed on January 17, 2007.

Present Condition of the Gate 1 Claim

Our company has conducted a helicopter-supported magnetic survey on the Gate 1 Claim and has received an exploration report on the results of that survey.

Outcroppings of bedrock are abundant and evergreen forest cover varies with elevation and soil conditions from dense to sparse. The Gate 1 Claim lies between elevations 2,500 and 3,400 feet above sea level.

The Tagish Lake and Atlin districts of northwestern British Columbia experience moderately cold winters and mild summers. Precipitation is strongly influenced by rain shadow effects, where the Coast Mountains receive heavy snowfall whereas the valleys and particularly the town of Atlin are much drier. Summers are warm with frequent rain showers in the mountains. Winters are cold with temperatures as low as minus 40 degrees Celsius (minus 40 degrees Fahrenheit). Periods of cold weather are mitigated by short intervals of warm Chinook conditions.

Currently, there is no equipment, infrastructure or electricity on the Gate 1 Claim.

Geology of the Gate 1 Claim

The Atlin mining district is geologically varied and complex. It is bordered to the west by the precipitous and glacier shrouded Coast Mountains and the attendant Coast Crystalline Complex of granitic terranes. The central portion is a deeply dissected plateau dominated by Mesozoic strata of mixed volcanic and volcanogenic formations. The east sector is a more mature terrain underlain by Cache Creek Group sedimentary rocks of oceanic origin. Farther east the underlying formations belong to the Sylvester Group of low grade metamorphic rocks of mid to late Paleozoic ages. Granitic rocks of the Coast Intrusions are abundantly present as bodies of batholithic proportions and as small stocks. The Atlin intrusions, a complex of greenstones, peridotites, dunite, and serpentinized equivalents, occur close to the Town of Atlin and also in broad belt south and southeast of the town. The ultramafic bodies in the vicinity of the historic gold mining areas are intimately associated with Cache Creek formations and smallish and raggedly irregular in outline whereas the Mount O’Keefe or Nahlin ultramafic body is very large and much less disrupted by fracturing. All bodies are alpine-type ultramafites.

The major structural break in the area is the Llewellyn Fault, which trends roughly north south and runs through the Taku Arm east of the property. On the eastern shore of Tagish Lake, the area is underlain by Laberge Group-Inklin Formation sedimentary rocks, of which include: argillite, greywacke, conglomerate, mudstone, siltstone, shale, and fine clastics. Along the Llewellyn Fault, the area is underlain by the Stuhini Group, and unit calcalkaline volcanics consisting of rhyolites to

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 5

intermediate tuff and breccia. The very north-west of the property is dominated by the Boundary Ranges Metamorphic suite, which consists of Devonian to middle Triassic greenstone and greenshist facies rocks. At the very western edge of the property lies a plug of granitoid rocks from the Sloko-Hyder Plutonic Suite.

Competition

The mineral exploration business is an extremely competitive industry. Our company is competing with many other exploration companies looking for minerals. We are one of the smallest exploration companies and a very small participant in the mineral exploration business. Being a junior mineral exploration company, we compete with other similar mineral exploration companies for financing and joint venture partners. Additionally, we compete for resources such as professional geologists, camp staff, helicopters and mineral exploration supplies.

Source and Availability of Raw Materials

Raw materials for our proposed mineral exploration program will be items including camp equipment, sample bags, first aid supplies, groceries and propane. All of these types of materials are readily available in either the city of Vancouver, British Columbia or the town of Atlin, British Columbia from a variety of suppliers.

Dependence on Major Customers

We do not have any customers, as of May 31, 2010.

Patents/Trade Marks/Licences/Franchises/Concessions/Royalty Agreements or Labour Contracts

We On ~~have~~May no1, ~~intellectual~~2010, ~~property~~we ~~such~~entered into an executive employment agreement with Paul J. Artzer whereby Mr. Artzer will act as ~~patents~~vice orpresident ~~trademarks~~of research development. ~~Additionally~~ Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, weMr. ~~have~~Artzer nowill ~~royalty~~grant ~~agreements~~our orcompany ~~labor~~the ~~contracts~~exclusive universal (worldwide) right to manufacture, market and distribute the Artzer Z-Panel.

Government Controls and Regulations

~~Our~~ The ~~company~~Artzer ~~will~~Z-Panel behas ~~required~~been toapprove ~~comply~~by ~~with all regulations defined in~~ the ~~Mineral~~US ~~Tenure~~and ~~Act~~Mexican ~~(British~~governments ~~Columbia).~~to ~~The~~meet ~~Mineral~~the ~~Tenure Act~~appropriate isbuilding ~~well~~codes. ~~defined~~Other bythan ~~the~~these ~~Province~~codes ofthere ~~British~~are ~~Columbia~~no ~~and~~special isGovernment ~~available~~controls ~~from our~~or ~~company upon request~~regulations.

~~The~~Forza ~~effect~~Environmental ofBuilding ~~these~~Products, ~~existing regulations on our business is that we are able to carry out our exploration program as described in our plan of operation~~Inc. ~~However,~~Form it10-K is- ~~possible~~2010 ~~that~~Page ~~a future government could change the regulations that could limit our ability to explore the Gate 1 Claim, but management believes this is highly unlikely.~~5

Management believes that our company is in substantial compliance with all material current government controls and regulations at the Gate 1 Claim.

Costs and Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws

We currently have no costs to comply with environmental laws concerning our exploration program on the Gate 1 Claim.

Research and Development

We have not incurred any research or development expenditures since our inception on May 26, 2006.

Number of Employees

~~Our~~As ~~only~~at ~~employee~~May is31, ~~our sole officer and director~~2010, ~~Shaun~~we ~~P. Davis.~~have ~~Management~~four ~~has~~employees ~~retained~~ in ~~the~~California ~~past~~ and ~~will continue to retain the~~ ~~services~~two ofin ~~independent geologists, prospectors and consultants on a contract basis as required throughout the course of our exploration program~~Texas.

REPORTS TO SECURITY HOLDERS

We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our filings are available to the public over the internet at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and formation statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, at http://www.sec.gov.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 6

Exchange Commission at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and formation statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, at http://www.sec.gov.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Much of the information included in this annual report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements". Such forward looking statements include any projections or estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Such estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements" involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements".

Our common shares are considered speculative as our business is still in an early growth stage of its development. Prospective investors should consider carefully the risk factors set out below.

Because our auditors have issued a going concern opinion, there is substantial uncertainty we will continue activities in which case you could lose your investment.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business for the next twelve months. As such we may have to cease activities and you could lose your investment.

Because the probability of an individual prospect ever having reserves is extremely remote, any funds spent on exploration will probably be lost.

The probability of an individual prospect ever having reserves is extremely remote. In all probability, the property does not contain any reserves. As such, any funds spent on exploration will probably be lost which will result in a loss of your investment.

We lack an operating history and have losses which we expect to continue into the future. As a result, we may have to suspend or cease activities.

We were incorporated on May 26, 2006 and have not realized any revenues. We have no operating history upon which an evaluation of our future success or failure can be made. Our net loss from inception of development stage to May 31, ~~2009~~2010 is $~~152~~28,~~743~~049. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow is dependent upon:

our ability to ~~locate~~market athe ~~profitable~~Artzer ~~mineral property~~Z-PanelTM
our ability to generate revenues
our ability to ~~reduce~~control ~~exploration~~production costs. of the Artzer Z-PanelTM

Based upon current plans, we expect to incur operating losses in future periods. This will happen because there are expenses associated with the ~~research~~startup ~~and exploration~~ of ~~our~~manufacturing ~~mineral~~and ~~properties~~marketing programs. As a result, we may not generate revenues in the future. Failure to generate revenues will cause us to suspend or cease activities.

~~Because~~Forza weEnvironmental ~~will~~Building ~~have to spend additional funds to determine if we have a reserve~~Products, ifInc. weForm ~~can't~~10-K ~~raise~~- ~~the~~2010 ~~money~~Page ~~we will have to cease operations and you could lose your investment.~~6

~~Even if we complete our current exploration programs and are~~ ~~successful~~Trading in ~~identifying~~our acommon ~~mineral~~shares ~~deposit,~~on wethe ~~will~~OTCQB ~~have~~exchange tois ~~spend~~limited ~~substantial funds on further drilling~~ and ~~engineering~~sporadic ~~studies~~making ~~before~~it wedifficult ~~will~~for ~~know~~our ifshareholders weto ~~have a~~sell ~~commercially~~their ~~viable~~shares ~~mineral~~or ~~deposit,~~liquidate atheir ~~reserve~~investments.

~~Gurata~~ Our ~~Gold~~common shares are currently listed for public trading on the OTCQB exchange. The trading price of our common shares has been subject to wide fluctuations. Trading prices of our common shares may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, ~~Inc~~many of which will be beyond our control. ~~Form~~The ~~10-K~~stock -market ~~2009~~has ~~Page~~generally 7experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with no current business operation. There can be no assurance that trading prices and price earnings ratios previously experienced by our common shares will be matched or maintained. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance.

Because we will have to spend additional funds to determine if we have a reserve, if we cannoot raise the money we will have to cease operations and you could lose your investment.

Even if we complete our current exploration programs and are successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit, a reserve.

Because our management only has limited technical training or experience in exploring for, starting, and operating an exploration program, management's decisions and choices may not take into account standard engineering or managerial approaches mineral exploration companies commonly use. As a result, we may have to suspend or cease activities which will result in the loss of your investment.

Our management has limited experience with exploring for, starting, and operating an exploration program. Further, our management has no direct training or experience in these areas and as a result may not be fully aware of many of the specific requirements related to working within the industry. Management's decisions and choices may not take into account standard engineering or managerial approaches mineral exploration companies commonly use. Consequently our activities, earnings and ultimate financial success could suffer irreparable harm due to management' s lack of experience in this industry. As a result we may have to suspend or cease activities which will result in the loss of your investment.

Because we are small and do not have much capital, we may have to limit our exploration activity which may result in a loss of your investment.

Because we are small and do not have much capital, we must limit our exploration activity. As such we may not be able to complete an exploration program that is as thorough as we would like. In that event, an existing reserve may go undiscovered. Without a reserve, we cannot generate revenues and you will lose your investment.

We may not have access to all of the supplies and materials we need to begin exploration which could cause us to delay or suspend activities.

Competition and unforeseen limited sources of supplies in the industry could result in occasional spot shortages of supplies, such as dynamite, and certain equipment such as bulldozers and excavators that we might need to conduct exploration. We have not attempted to locate or negotiate with any suppliers of products, equipment or materials. If we cannot find the products and equipment we need, we will have to suspend our exploration plans until we do find the products and equipment we need.

Trading in our common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board is limited and sporadic making it difficult for our shareholders to sell their shares or liquidate their investments.

Our common shares are currently listed for public trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. The trading price of our common shares has been subject to wide fluctuations. Trading prices of our common shares may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond our control. The stock market has generally experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with no current business operation. There can be no assurance that trading prices and price earnings ratios previously experienced by our common shares will be matched or maintained. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs for us and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 8

rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may also limit a stockholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the "penny stock" rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

~~None~~ As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Description of Property.

Our executive offices are located at ~~11730~~5927 NEBalfour ~~107th Place~~Court, ~~Kirkland~~Suite 112, ~~Washington~~Carlsbad, ~~98033~~CA 92008. Our ~~president~~CFO, ~~Shaun~~Michael ~~P. Davis~~Lee, currently provides this space to our company ~~free~~at a rate of ~~charge~~$1,700 per month and it is suitable for our purposes. ~~This space may not be available to our company free of charge in the future.~~

WeForza ~~also~~Environmental ~~have~~Building ~~an interest in one mineral claim (Gate 1 Claim) located in the Atlin Mining Division~~Products, ~~British~~Inc. ~~Columbia,~~Form ~~Canada~~10-K as- ~~described~~2010 ~~in more~~Page ~~detail above in “Item 1. Description of Business”.~~7

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company

Item 4. ~~Submission~~[Removed ofand ~~Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.~~Reserved]

NoPART ~~matter~~II ~~was submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.~~

PART II

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 9

Market Information

Our common stock has been quoted on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “GUGO” ~~since~~from February 1, 2008 to present. The table below gives the high and low bid information for each fiscal quarter of trading and for the ~~interim~~ ~~period~~fiscal year ended ~~October~~May 3031, ~~2009~~2010. The bid information was obtained from Pink OTC Markets Inc. and reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

High & Low Bids
Period ended	High	Low
30 October 2009	$N/A	$N/A
31 May 2010	$0.40	$0.21
31 August 2009	$0.022	$0.02
28 February 2010	$0.205	$0.35
31 May 2009	$0.04	$0.02
30 November 2009	$N/A	$N/A
29 February 2009	$N/A	$N/A
31 August 2009	$0.022	$0.02
30 November 2008	$N/A	$N/A
31 May 2009	$0.04	$0.02
31 August 2008	$0.55	$0.30
28 February 2009	$N/A	$N/A
31 May 2008	$0.30	$0.10
30 November 2008	$N/A	$N/A
29 February 2008	none	none
31 August 2008	$0.55	$0.30
31 May 2008	$0.30	$0.10
29 February 2008	none	none

Holders of Record

There were 2417 holders of record of our common stock as of ~~October~~August 3025, ~~2009~~2010 according to a shareholders’ list provided by our transfer ~~agent~~ agent as of that date. The number of registered shareholders does not include ~~any~~ any estimate by our company of the number of beneficial owners of common stock ~~held~~ held in street name. The transfer agent for our common stock is Empire Stock ~~Transfer~~ Transfer Inc., 1859 Whitney Mesa Drive, Henderson, Nevada, 89014 and their ~~telephone~~ telephone number is 702-818-5898.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Subsequent to the year ended May 31, 2010, we issued a total of 1,300,000 shares of our common stock for $300,000.

On August 23, 2006, Forza issued 19,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.001 per share to its former President, Mr. Gurat.

On July 11, 2006, Forza issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.001 per share to its former President, Mr. Gurat.

On November 30, 2007, we issued 17,000,000 shares of our common stock for $85,000.

OnForza ~~July~~Environmental ~~11,~~Building ~~2006~~Products, ~~Gurata issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0~~Inc.~~001~~ ~~per~~Form ~~share~~10-K to- ~~its~~2010 ~~former~~Page ~~President, Feliberto Gurat.~~8

On ~~August~~July 238, ~~2006,~~2010 ~~Gurata~~our company issued 19250,000~~,000~~ shares ~~of common stock~~ at ~~a price of~~ $0.~~001~~20 per share tofor ~~its~~proceeds ~~former~~of ~~President~~$50, Mr000. ~~Gurat.~~

On July 8, 2010 our company issued 250,000 shares at $0.20 per share for proceeds of $50,000.

On July 8, 2010 our company issued 120,000 shares at $0.25 per share for proceeds of $30,000.

On July 29, 2010 our company issued 280,000 shares at $0.25 per share for proceeds of $70,000.

On August 2, 2010 our company issued 400,000 shares at $0.25 per share for proceeds of $100,000.

With respect to all of the above offerings, our company completed the offerings of the common stock pursuant to Rule 903 of Regulation S of the Act on the basis that the sale of the common stock was completed in an “offshore transaction”, as defined in Rule 902(h) of Regulation S. Our company did not engage in any directed selling efforts, as defined in Regulation S, in the United States in connection with the sale of the common stock. Each investor represented to our company that the investor was not a U.S. person, as defined in Regulation S, and was not acquiring the common stock for the account or benefit of a U.S. person. The subscription agreement executed between our company and the investor included statements that the securities had not been registered pursuant to the Act and that the securities may not be offered or sold in the United States unless the securities are registered under the Act or pursuant to an exemption from the Act. The investor agreed by execution of the subscription agreement for the common stock: (i) to resell the securities purchased only in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S, pursuant to registration under the Act or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Act; (ii) that Our company is required to refuse to register any sale of the securities purchased unless the transfer is in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S, pursuant to registration under the Act or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Act; and (iii) not to engage in hedging transactions with regards to the securities purchased unless in compliance with the Act. All securities issued were endorsed with a restrictive legend confirming that the securities had been issued pursuant to Regulation S of the Act and could not be resold without registration under the Act or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Act.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 10

Each investor was given adequate access to sufficient information about our company to make an informed investment decision. None of the securities were sold through an underwriter and accordingly, there were no underwriting discounts or commissions involved. No registration rights were granted to any of the investor.

There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or securities convertible into, shares of our company’s common stock.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010.

Use of Proceeds

On September 6, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared our Form SB-2 Registration Statement effective, file number 333-145498, permitting our company to offer up to 20,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.005 per share. There is no underwriter involved in this public offering. We accepted 27 subscription agreements for a total of $85,000 and issued 17 million shares. The offering period for the public offering expired on March 3, 2008.

Our company spent $12,764 of the proceeds on the offering expenses, which included $4,574 on legal and registration fees, $6,000 on accounting and auditing fees, $1,190 on electronic filing and printing fees, and $1,000 on transfer agent fees. The net proceeds to our company after deducting the offering expenses were $72,236. We also raised $17,000 in advances from an unrelated party.

As of May 31, ~~2009~~2010, our company had spent $13,697 of the net proceeds on a helicopter-supported magnetic survey on the Gate 1 Claim. In addition, our company had also spent a total of $87141,~~000~~900 of the net proceeds on working capital, which included $2760,900 on consulting fees, $1416,~~400~~400in in legal fees, $1939,500 on administration fees, $16,500 in audit fees, $3,400 on mineral title costs, $2,300 in tax preparation fees, and $2,900 in regulatory and filing fees.

The reason for the material change in the use of proceeds from what was described in our company’s Registration Statement was because our company’s consulting geological technician recommended the helicopter-supported magnetic survey on ~~the Gate 1 Claim in order to gather more information on the~~ ~~Gate 1 Claim to identify specific target areas for~~ the ~~rock sampling program in the Phase One Exploration program.~~

~~Penny~~Forza ~~Stock~~Environmental ~~Rules~~Building Products, Inc. Form 10-K - 2010 Page 9

~~Trading~~Gate in1 ~~our~~Claim ~~common~~in ~~stock~~order ~~is subject~~ to ~~the~~gather ~~“penny~~more ~~stock” rules.~~information ~~The~~on ~~SEC~~the ~~has~~Gate ~~adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be~~1 ~~any~~Claim ~~equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject~~ to ~~certain~~identify ~~exceptions.~~specific ~~These~~target ~~rules~~areas ~~require that any broker-dealer who recommends our common stock to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors, must, prior to the sale, make a special written suitability determination~~ for the ~~purchaser~~rock ~~and~~sampling ~~receive~~program the purchaser’s written agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with trading in the ~~penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers must~~ ~~disclose~~Phase ~~commissions~~One ~~payable~~Exploration ~~to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities they offer~~program. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our securities, which could severely limit their market price and liquidity of our securities. The application of the “penny stock” rules may affect your ability to resell our securities.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

~~Overview~~FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

~~You~~This ~~should~~annual ~~read~~report ~~this~~contains ~~discussion~~forward-looking ~~and~~statements. ~~analysis in conjunction~~These ~~with~~are ~~our~~statements ~~audited~~regarding financial ~~statements~~and operating performance and ~~related~~results ~~notes~~and other ~~included~~statements inthat ~~this~~are ~~Form 10-K~~not historical facts. The ~~inclusion~~words of“expect,” ~~supplementary~~“project,” “estimate,” ~~analytical~~“believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “forecast,” and ~~related~~similar expressions ~~information~~are ~~may~~intended to identify forward-looking statements. Certain ~~require~~important usrisks could cause results to ~~make~~differ ~~estimates~~materially ~~and~~from those anticipated by some of the forward-looking statements. Some, but not all, of these risks include, among other things:

~~Gurata~~general ~~Gold~~economic conditions, ~~Inc.~~because ~~Form~~they ~~10-K~~may -affect ~~2009~~our ~~Page~~ability 11to raise money,
~~assumptions~~our toability ~~enable us~~ to ~~fairly~~raise ~~present,~~enough inmoney ~~all~~to ~~material respects,~~continue our ~~analysis of trends and expectations with respect to our results of~~ operations ~~and financial position taken as a whole. Actual results may vary from~~, ~~the estimates and assumptions we make.~~
~~Our~~changes ~~principal~~in ~~business~~regulatory isrequirements ~~the~~that ~~acquisition~~adversely ~~and~~affect ~~exploration~~our ~~of mineral resources in northwestern British Columbia~~business, ~~Canada.~~
Wechanges ~~are~~ in the ~~early~~prices ~~exploration~~for ~~stage.~~minerals Inthat anadversely ~~exploration~~affect ~~stage company, management devotes most of its time to conducting exploratory work and developing its business. Our continuation as a going concern and~~ our ~~ability to emerge from the exploration stage with our planned principal~~ business ~~activity is dependent upon our continued financial support~~, ~~ability to attain profitable~~ ~~operations and ability to raise equity financing.~~
~~“We”,~~political ~~“us”~~changes orin ~~“our” means Gurata Gold~~Canada, ~~Inc.~~which ~~throughout~~could ~~the balance~~affect ofour ~~this~~interests ~~document.~~there, and
Weother ~~were incorporated on May 26~~uncertainties, ~~2006~~all ~~in the state~~ of ~~Nevada. Our~~which ~~principal~~are ~~business~~difficult isto ~~the~~predict ~~acquisition~~ and ~~exploration~~many of ~~mineral resources~~ in which ~~northern British Columbia. We have not presently determined whether our properties contain mineral reserves that~~ are ~~economically~~beyond recoverable. We have not commenced significant operations and are considered an Exploration Stage Company, as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7, and follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.7 Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises, where applicable. We have no operations and if our ~~mineral claims are not successfully developed we will not earn any revenues~~control.

~~Results~~We ofcaution ~~Operations~~you ~~for~~not ~~our~~to ~~Years~~place ~~Ended~~undue ~~May~~reliance 31on these forward-looking statements, ~~2009~~which reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this report. We are not obligated to update these statements or publicly release the results of any revisions to them to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should refer to and ~~2008~~carefully review the information in future documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

~~Our~~In ~~operating~~this ~~results~~annual ~~for~~report, ~~our~~unless ~~years~~otherwise ~~ended~~specified, ~~May~~all ~~31,~~dollar amounts ~~2009,~~are ~~and~~expressed in United States dollars. All references to "US$" refer to ~~2008~~United States dollars and ~~the~~all ~~changes~~references ~~between~~to ~~those~~"common ~~periods~~stock" ~~for~~refer to the ~~respective~~common shares ~~items~~in ~~are summarized~~our ascapital ~~follows:~~stock.

	Year Ended May 31 2009 $	Year Ended May 31, 2008 $	Change Between Year Ended May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2008 $
Administrative fees	10,875	8,624	2,251
Bank charges and interest	179	158	21
Consulting	7,391	20,500	(13,109)
Exploration and Development	1,716	15,366	(13,650)
Office	Nil	123	(123)
Professional fees	36,067	28,698	7,369
Regulatory	2,472	2,616	(144)
Net loss for the period	58,700	76,085	(17,385)

As used in this quarterly report, the terms "we", "us", "our" and "our company" mean Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

General Overview and Business Development over the Last Three Years

We were incorporated in the state of Nevada on May 26, 2006. On January 17, 2007, we acquired the Gate 1 Claim, a mineral claim in the Province of British Columbia. Until May 17, 2010 we were in the business mineral exploration. Significant amounts of mineralization were not found and we decided to change our business focus.

The cost of the Gate 1 Claim charged to operations by Forza was $1,000, which represented the cost to acquire the Gate 1 Claim via a property agreement with Kenneth Ralfs.

On May 18, 2010 we announced that we had acquired the worldwide exclusive rights to manufacture, market and distribute the Artzer Z-Panel building product. The panel will be used for housing projects around the world. Our company intends to provide environmentally sound, energy-efficient materials for safe, sustainable shelter to disaster replacement building projects.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 10

Results of Operations

Years Ended May 31, 2010 and 2009

Our operating results for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 and the changes between those periods for the expenses are summarized as follows:

	Year Ended May 31 2010 $	Year Ended May 31, 2009 $	Change Between Year Ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 $
Administrative fees	3,500	Nil	3,500
Bank charges and interest	95	Nil	95
Consulting	7,313	Nil	7,313
Rent	1,700	Nil	1,700
Office	4,585	Nil	4,585
Wages and salaries	112,615	Nil	112,615
Professional fees	3,241	Nil	3,241
Discontinued operations	69,284	58,700	10,584
Net loss for the period	202,333	58,700	143,633

During the year ended May 31, 2010, our net loss increased by $143,633 an increase of 245% from $58,700 for the year ended May 31, 2009 to $202,333 for the year ended May 31, 2010.

The $143,633 increase in our net loss for the year ended May 31, 2010 was primarily caused by increases in consulting expenses, wages and salaries, office expenses and administrative fees. All of these expenses increased because similar expenses from the prior year were reclassified to discontinued operations. The above expenses represent expenses incurred in the last half of May for setting up our new project of manufacturing, marketing and distributing the Artzer Z-Panel.

The expenses listed under discontinued operations refer to expenses incurred while our focus was on the development of our Gate 1 mineral claim in Northern British Columbia.

Revenues

WeOver ~~have~~the next 12 months, we do not ~~earned~~anticipate generating any significant ~~revenues~~revenue ~~since~~and we expect our ~~inception~~operating losses to be approximately $700,000. We plan to develop our business to market the Artzer Z-Panel worldwide to areas that have been affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and wehurricanes. We do not ~~anticipate~~have ~~earning~~any ~~revenues~~financing inarranged and cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the ~~near~~sale ~~future~~of our shares of common stock or that we will receive private advances.

Operating Expenses

During the year ended May 31, 2009, our net loss decreased by $17,385 a decrease of 23% from $76,085 for the year ended May 31, 2008 to $58,700 for the year ended May 31, 2009.

The $17,385 decrease in our net loss for the year ending May 31, 2009 was primarily caused by a reduction in consulting fees and in exploration and development expenses which were partially offset by increases in professional fees and administrative fees.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 12

Over the next 12 months, we do not anticipate generating any revenue and we expect our operating losses to be approximately $71,000. We plan to continue to fund Phase Two of our mineral exploration program and our operations through equity financing from the sale of our shares of common stock, private advances or through the sale of a part interest in the Gate 1 Claim. We do not have any financing arranged and cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our shares of common stock, that we will receive private advances or that we will be able to sell a part interest in the Gate 1 Claim. Although we have not attempted to locate a joint venture partner, if we enter into a joint venture arrangement, we would assign a percentage of our interest in the Gate 1 Claim to our joint venture.

Sources and Uses of Cash

		For the Year Ended
		May 31, 2009			May 31, 2008
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(28,861	)	$	(70,767	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		-			85,000
Net (decrease) increase in cash during the period	$	(28,861	)	$	14,233

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities during the year ended May 31, 2009 was $28,861. We used cash primarily to pay down our accrued administrative and professional fees by $1,799 and $28 respectively and to cover our net loss of $58,700. These uses of cash were offset primarily by receipt of deposits receivable of $6,199, an increase in accounts payable of $10,359 and an increase in advances payable of $15,108.

Net cash used in operating activities during the year ended May 31, 2008 was $70,767. We used cash primarily to fund our net loss of $76,085, payment of accrued liabilities of $15 and on an increase in deposit receivable from our consulting geologist of $6,303 due to overpayment of a deposit on the helicopter-supported magnetic survey. Included in our net cash used in operations are increases in accounts payable of $7,960 primarily due to an increase in professional fees; accrued administration fees of $3,675; and a $1 increase in the amount due to our former president

Liquidity and Financial Condition

At May 31, ~~2009~~2010, we had a cash balance of $150,~~339~~890 and negative cash flows from operations of $2850,~~861~~449. During the year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010, we funded our operations with cash that we received from the sale of common stock ~~in prior years~~ and from advances from an unrelated party made in prior years.

~~Working~~Forza ~~Capital~~Environmental Building Products, Inc. Form 10-K - 2010 Page 11

		At			At
		May 31,			May 31,
		2009			2008
Current assets	$	1,443		$	36,503
Current liabilities		38,936			15,296
Working capital	$	(37,493	)	$	21,207

Cash Flows

		Year Ended
		As at
		May 31,			~~May 31~~
		2009			2008
		2010			2009
Cash flows used in operating activities	$	(28,861	)	$	(70,767	)
Net Cash (Used In) Operating Activities	$	(50,449	)	$	(28,861	)
Cash flows used in investing activities		Nil			Nil
Net Cash (Used In) Investing Activities	$	Nil		$	Nil
Cash flows provided by financing activities		Nil			85,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	$	100,000		$	Nil
Net increase (decrease) in cash during period	$	(28,861	)	$	14,233
Increase (Decrease) in Cash During the Period	$	49,551		$	(28,861	)

~~Gurata~~Net ~~Gold,~~Cash ~~Inc.~~Used ~~Form~~in ~~10-K~~Operating -Activities ~~2009 Page 13~~

~~Operating~~Net ~~Activities~~cash used in operating activities during the year ended May 31, 2010 was $50,449. We used cash primarily to cover our net loss of $202,333. This use of cash was offset primarily by increases in accounts payable of $24,976, advances payable of $18,075 and accrued administrative fees of $3,124.

Net cash used in operating activities ~~was~~during ~~$28,861~~the ~~for our~~ year ended May 31, 2009 ~~compared~~was ~~with~~$28,861. ~~cash~~We used incash ~~operating~~primarily ~~activities~~to fund our net loss of $7058,~~767 in~~700. ~~the~~Cash ~~same~~was ~~period~~also inused ~~2008.~~due ~~The~~to ~~decrease~~a reduction of ~~$41,906~~accrued inadministrative ~~operating~~fees ~~activities~~of is$1,799 ~~mainly~~and ~~attributable~~a toreduction aof ~~decrease~~accrued inprofessional ~~exploration~~fees ~~activity~~of ~~due~~$28. toThese auses ~~lack~~were ofoffset ~~funds~~by ~~and~~increases ~~our~~in ~~success~~accounts inpayable ~~extending~~of ~~the~~$10,359 ~~expiry~~and ~~date~~a collection of ~~our~~deposits ~~Gate~~receivable of 1$6,199 ~~claim~~and toan ~~February~~increase ~~10, 2012~~in ~~with~~advances ~~our~~payable ~~earlier~~of ~~exploration expenditures~~$15,108.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

~~Net~~We ~~cash~~did ~~used~~not inhave any investing activities ~~was~~during ~~$Nil~~the ~~for~~years ~~our year~~ ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010 ~~compared~~and ~~to net cash used in investing activities of $Nil in the same period in 2008~~2009.

Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities

~~Net~~During ~~cash~~the ~~from financing activities was $Nil for our~~ year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010, ~~compared to~~ $85100,000 incash ~~the~~was ~~same~~provided through ~~period~~the insale ~~2008. The decrease~~ of ~~$85~~ 500,000 inshares ~~financing~~at ~~activities~~$0.20 isper ~~mainly~~share. ~~attributable~~During tothe ayear ~~lack~~ended ~~of interest in~~May ~~the~~31, ~~market~~2009 ~~for~~we ~~new~~did ~~projects~~not ~~such~~have asany ~~ours~~financing ~~due to the current economic conditions~~activities.

~~Contractual~~Working ~~Obligations~~Capital

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

		At			At
		May 31,			May 31,
		2010			2009
Current assets	$	50,999		$	1,443
Current liabilities		(85,825	)		(38,936	)
Working capital	$	(34,826	)	$	(37,493	)

Going Concern

Due to lack of operating history and present inability to generate revenues, there currently exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Even if we complete our current exploration program and we are successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit or reserve.

The notes to our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that we will continue to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business. We have not generated any revenues since inception and have never paid any dividends and we are unlikely to pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from our shareholders, our ability to obtain the necessary equity financing to continue operations, confirmation our interests in the underlying properties, and the attainment of profitable operations. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flows is dependent upon our ability to locate profitable mineral properties, generate revenues from our mineral production and control production costs. Based upon current plans, we expect to incur operating losses in future periods. At May 31, 2009, we had accumulated losses of $152,743 since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. There is no assurance that we will be able to generate revenues in the future. These financial statements do not give any effect to any adjustments that would be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Unproved Mineral Property

Gate 1 Claim

On December 15, 2006 we purchased the Gate 1 Claim near Atlin, British Columbia, Canada, comprising an area of 376.488 hectares for $1,000. ~~The~~ The Gate 1 Claim is registered in the name of a former director and pursuant to a trust agreement is held in trust on our behalf. ~~See Exhibit 10.2 – Trust agreement for more details.~~

~~Gurata~~At ~~Gold~~May 31, ~~Inc.~~2010, ~~Form~~we ~~10-K~~had spent $21,058 on exploration work including a helicopter-supported ~~2009~~magnetic ~~Page~~survey 14on the Gate 1 Claim. On December 15, 2008, our company registered exploration work performed on its unproved mineral property with the Government of British Columbia, which allows our company to retain title to the claim until February 10, 2012.

AtForza ~~May~~Environmental ~~31,~~Building ~~2009~~Products, weInc. ~~had~~Form ~~spent~~10-K ~~$21,058 on exploration work including a helicopter~~-~~supported~~ ~~magnetic~~2010 ~~survey~~Page on the Gate 1 Claim. On December 15, 2008, the Company registered exploration work performed on its unproved mineral property with the Government of British Columbia, which allows the Company to retain title to the claim until February 10, 2012.12

Exploration ~~Plan~~of the property did not find significant mineralization and the claim will be abandoned immediately.

On June 18, 2008, we received an exploration report on a helicopter-supported magnetic survey on the Gate 1 Claim from our consulting geologist. The report recommends prospecting and surveying the Gate 1 Claim. If the prospecting is successful in discovering mineralization the report recommends following up with an IP/resistivity survey in order to verify magnetic anomalies and help determine the depth of the causative source. Management will review the report in 2009 and have discussions with our consulting geologist in order to determine the economic viability of the mineral claim based on the data that was obtained in the helicopter-supported magnetic survey.

Due to our current financial condition we do not have enough cash to start Phase Two in July 2009 as disclosed in previous SEC filings. In light of difficult global financial conditions we will delay our exploration plans for one year.

The following is a brief summary of our four phase exploration program:

1. Management will review the geological report about the helicopter-supported magnetic survey in 2009 and have discussions with our consulting geologist in order to determine the economic viability of the mineral claim based on the data that was obtained in magnetic survey. This phase will be called Phase One. 2. If Phase One is successful, we plan to conduct the second phase of our four phase exploration program starting in July 2010. This Phase Two exploration program is expected to cost approximately $17,200 (CDN$20,000). A two-person field crew will fly to the Gate 1 Claim and will stay for a period of 15 days. During this period the crew will generally survey the Gate 1 Claim seeking any outcroppings and locating streams. An outcropping is a part of a rock formation that appears above the surface of the surrounding land. The crew will use global positioning equipment, take 100 geochemical samples and take 15 rock samples. All samples will be bagged and tagged for location, date and time for later analysis. After this period is over the crew will return to Atlin by float plane. 3. The samples obtained during the Phase Two exploration program will be analyzed at a laboratory and we will review the results of the Phase Two exploration program in the winter of 2010. We will engage our consulting geologist to interpret the results of Phase Two. It is estimated that the analysis and interpretation of results will cost approximately $3,000 (CDN$3,500). If we are able to identify favorable rock formations and structures with elevated metal values we will plan and conduct a Phase Three program. 4. If the Phase Three program were to proceed, our consulting geologist has indicated that we should budget approximately $51,700 (CDN$60,000). If we proceed with our Phase Three program we would do so in July 2011. A small crew will fly to the Gate 1 Claim and will stay for a period of time to be determined. During this period the crew will continue with Phase Two field work including additional sampling and mapping, magnetometer survey, trenching and a small number of diamond drill holes. All samples will be bagged and tagged for location, date and time for later analysis. After this period is over the crew will return to Atlin by float plane. 5. In the case that the Phase Three exploration program takes place, we will review the results in winter 2011. If we are able to continue to confirm elevated metal values at specific hand drilled targets we will consider Phase Three a success and will plan for a Phase Four exploration program. The Phase Four exploration program is expected to cost at least $215,500 (CDN$250,000). At this stage, we would seek to link with a major resource company in a joint venture relationship in recognition of financing requirements. If we proceed with Phase Four of our exploration plan we would commence in July 2012.

Challenges and Risks

On May 31, ~~2009~~2010, we had cash of ~~approximately~~ $150,~~339~~890. We will proceed with the manufacturing and marketing of the Artzer Z-Panel and we will have to raise additional funds to cover ~~our~~the ~~operating~~ costs ~~and~~associated ~~commence~~with ~~Phase Two~~manufacturing and of marketing ~~our~~the ~~mineral exploration program~~panel.

~~During~~Over the next 12 months, we do not anticipate generating any significant revenue and we expect our operating losses to be approximately $700,000. If we require additional funds, we anticipate this additional funding will come from equity financing from the sale of our common stock, private loans or advances. orIf ~~the~~we ~~sale~~are ofsuccessful ~~part~~in completing an equity financing, existing shareholders will experience dilution of ~~our~~their interest. inWe ~~the~~do ~~Gate~~not 1have ~~Claim.~~any financing Ifarranged and cannot provide investors with any assurance that we ~~are~~will ~~successful~~be inable ~~completing~~to anraise ~~equity~~sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or obtain private loans or advances to fund our manufacturing and marketing program. In the absence of such financing, ~~existing~~our ~~shareholders~~business will fail.

~~Gurata~~The ~~Gold~~start-up costs associated with manufacturing the Artzer Z-Panels will initially outpace the revenues received. Our future financial results are also uncertain due to a number of factors, ~~Inc~~some of which are outside our control. ~~Form~~These ~~10-K~~factors -include, ~~2009~~but ~~Page~~are 15not limited to:

experience dilution of their interest. We do not have any financing arranged and cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or obtain private loans or advances to fund our mineral exploration program. In the absence of such financing, our business will fail.

We may consider entering into a joint venture partnership by linking with a major resource company to provide the required funding to complete our Phase Four exploration program. We have not undertaken any efforts to locate a joint venture partner for Phase Four. If we enter into a joint venture arrangement, we will assign a percentage of our interest in the Gate 1 Claim to the joint venture partner.

Based on the nature of our business, we anticipate incurring operating losses in the foreseeable future. We base this expectation, in part, on the fact that very few mineral claims in the exploration stage ultimately develop into producing, profitable mines. Our future financial results are also uncertain due to a number of factors, some of which are outside our control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

our ability to raise additional funding;
~~the~~our ~~market~~ability ~~price~~to find markets for ~~gold~~the Artzer Z-Panel;
~~the~~Our ~~results~~ability ofto ~~our~~control ~~proposed~~the ~~exploration~~costs ~~programs~~in onproduction of the ~~Gate~~Artzer ~~1 Claim~~Z-Panel; ~~and~~

our ability to find joint venture partners for the development of our property interests.

Foreign Exchange

We are subject to foreign exchange risk for transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Foreign currency risk arises from the fluctuation of foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates relative to the United States dollar. We do not believe that we have any material risk due to foreign currency exchange.

Other Trends, Events or Uncertainties that may Impact Results of Operations or Liquidity, Trends, Events, and Uncertainties

The economic crisis in the United States and the resulting economic uncertainty and market instability may make it harder for us to raise capital as and when we need it and have made it difficult for us to assess the impact of the crisis on our operations or liquidity ~~and if the prices we will receive on the sale of minerals will exceed the cost of mineral exploitation~~. If we are unable to raise cash, we may be required to cease our operations. Other than as discussed in this annual report, we know of no other trends, events or uncertainties that have or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our short-term or long-term liquidity.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies our company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. Our company has not generated any revenues since inception and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. The continuation of our company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of our company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, confirmation of our company’s interests in the underlying properties, and the attainment of profitable operations. Our company’s ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flows is dependent upon its ability to manufacture and market the Artzer Z-Panels. Based upon current plans, our company expects to incur operating losses in future periods. At May 31, 2010, our company had an accumulated deficit of $355,076 since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our company’s ability to continue as a going concern. There is no assurance that our company will be able to generate revenues in the future. These financial statements do not give any effect to any adjustments that would be necessary should our company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 13

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Contingencies and Commitments

We had no commitments or contingencies at May 31, ~~2009~~2010.

Internal and External Sources of Liquidity

To date, we have funded our operations from the sale of our common stock and from advances from an unrelated party.

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

We do not expect the adoption of any new accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management's application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our consolidated financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the balance sheet and statement of cash flows, our company considers all amounts on deposit with financial institutions and highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. At May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, our company did not have any cash equivalents.

Financial Instruments

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject our company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~May 31, 2009 our company had approximately $50500 and $3050,~~000,~~ respectively in cash that was not insured. This cash is onbeing ~~deposit~~held ~~with~~by ~~a large chartered Canadian bank. As part of its cash management process,~~ our ~~company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of this financial institution~~CFO. Our company has not experienced any losses in cash balances and does not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Our company is subject to foreign exchange risk for transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Foreign currency risk arises from the fluctuation of foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates relative to the United States dollar. Our company does not believe that it has any material risk due to foreign currency exchange.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 16

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

~~Our~~On June 1, 2007, our company’s adopted Accounting Standard 820 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (AS 820). AS 820 relates to financial ~~instruments~~assets ~~include~~and ~~cash~~financial liabilities. AS 820 defines fair value, establishes ~~deposit~~a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles ~~receivable,~~generally ~~accounts~~accepted ~~payable,~~in ~~accrued~~the ~~liabilities~~United States of America (GAAP), and ~~accrued~~expands disclosures ~~administration~~about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements ofand ~~these~~are ~~financial~~to ~~instruments~~be ~~approximate~~applied ~~their~~prospectively ~~carrying~~with ~~values~~limited exceptions. The ~~due~~adoption of AS 820, as it relates to ~~their~~financial ~~short~~assets ~~maturities~~and financial liabilities, had no impact on our company’s financial statements.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 14

AS 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as defined in ASC 840. AS 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under AS 820 are described below:

Level 1 -	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 -	Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 -	Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Our company’s financial instruments include cash, deposit receivable, accounts payable, accrued administrative fees, professional fees and advances payable. The fair value of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values due to their short maturities.

Foreign Currency Translation

Our company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with ~~SFAS~~Accounting ~~No.~~Standard 52830 Foreign Currency ~~Translation~~Matters (AS 830), using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars. Our company has not to the date of ~~our~~these ~~audited~~ financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Our company’s financial statements are based on a number of estimates, including accruals for estimated administrative and professional fees.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive Income (loss) reflects changes in equity that results from transactions and economic events from non-owner sources. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~May 31, 2009, our company has no items that represent a comprehensive ~~income~~ income (loss) and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive ~~income~~ income (loss) in the financial statements.

Mineral Property Costs

Our company has been in the exploration stage since its inception on May 26, 2006 and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized when incurred using the guidance in the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 04-02, Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets. Our company assesses the carrying costs for impairment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets at each fiscal quarter end. An impairment is recognized when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the mineral property. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the mineral property over its estimated fair value (see Notes 5).

When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs then incurred to develop such property, are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the proven and probable reserves. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to operations.

Asset Retirement Obligations

~~SFAS No. 143 (“SFAS 143”),~~ Accounting ~~for~~Standard 410 Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations (AS 410) addresses financial accounting and reporting for ~~obligations~~ obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the ~~associated~~ associated asset retirement costs. Specifically, ~~SFAS~~AS ~~143~~410 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. In addition, the asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the asset’s carrying value and subsequently allocated to expense over the asset’s ~~useful~~ useful life. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~May 31, 2009, our company did not have any asset retirement obligations.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 15

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share (“EPS”)

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income per common share includes the potential dilution that could occur upon exercise of the options and warrants to acquire common stock computed using the treasury stock method which assumes that the increase in the number of shares is reduced by the number of shares which could have been repurchased by our company with the proceeds from the exercise of the options and warrants (which were assumed to have been made at the average market price of the common shares during the reporting period).

Potential common shares are excluded from the diluted loss per share computation in net loss periods as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

~~Gurata~~ At ~~Gold~~May 31, ~~Inc.~~2010, ~~Form~~our ~~10-K~~company -had ~~2009~~issued ~~Page~~39,000,000 17common shares and had no outstanding options or warrants.

~~At May 31, 2009, our company had issued 39,000,000 common~~ ~~shares~~Common ~~and~~Stock ~~had no outstanding options or warrants.~~

On July 11, 2006 and August 23, 2006, the Company issued 3,000,000 and 19,000,000 common shares respectively, at $0.001 per share for cash of $22,000.

On November 30, 2007, the Company issued 17,000,000 common shares at $0.005 per share for cash of $85,000.

On May 1, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 500,000 common shares valued at $105,000 or $0.21 per share as part of an employment agreement. As of the date of these financials statements, these shares have not been issued.

On May 13, 2010, a deposit of $50,000 was received for 250,000 common shares subscribed for at $0.20 per share. On May 27, 2010, a deposit of $50,000 was received for 250,000 common shares subscribed for at $0.20 per share. On July 8, 2010 our company issued 250,000 shares for the deposit that was received on May 13, 2010.

On July 8, 2010 our company issued 250,000 shares for the deposit that was received on May 27, 2010. On July 8, 2010 our company issued 120,000 shares at $0.25 per share for proceeds of $30,000 On July 19, 2010 our company issued 280,000 shares at $0.25 per share for proceeds of $70,000 On August 2, 2010 our company issued 400,000 shares at $0.25 per share for proceeds of $100,000

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, ~~the Financial~~ Accounting ~~Standards~~Standard ~~Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R)~~718, ~~Share-Based~~Compensation ~~Payment~~– ~~(SFAS 123(R)), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for~~ Stock~~-Based~~ Compensation~~. SFAS~~ ~~123~~(RAS 718) was ~~effective~~brought ~~for~~into ~~public companies for the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005, supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No~~effect. 25AS ~~(APB~~718 ~~25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123(R)~~ eliminates the option to use ~~APB~~the ~~25’s~~ intrinsic value method of accounting and requires recording expense for stock compensation based on a fair value based method.

The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have a material effect on our company’s financial condition or results of operations because since inception our company has not entered into any share-based transactions.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is based on pre-tax financial accounting income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carryforwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are individually classified as current and non-current based on their characteristics. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

On March 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 (SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis, until January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end entities. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which states that SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, (SFAS 13) and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under SFAS 13 are excluded from the provisions of SFAS 157, except for assets and liabilities related to leases assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value under SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, (SFAS 141) or SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, (SFAS 141(R)).

SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. The adoption of SFAS 157, as it relates to financial assets and financial liabilities had no impact on our financial statements.

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as defined in SFAS 13. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 18

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158 (“SFAS 158”), Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). This statement requires an employer to recognize the over funded or under funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity. This statement also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions. We are required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008, or June 1, 2008 for us. We do not have a defined benefit postretirement plan and thus the Adoption of SFAS 158 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (SFAS 159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS 159 permits measurement of certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. If the fair value option is elected, the unrealized gains and losses are reported in earnings at each reporting date. Generally, the fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, as long as it is applied to the instrument in its entirety. The fair value option election is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. SFAS 159 was effective for us on June 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on our financial statements as we did not elect the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities.

(EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3 requires that non-refundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities must be deferred and capitalized. As the related goods are delivered or the services are performed, or when the goods or services are no longer expected to be provided, the deferred amounts must be recognized as an expense. This issue is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and earlier application is not permitted. This consensus is to be applied prospectively for new contracts entered into on or after the effective date. We adopted EITF 07-03 on June 1, 2008. The adoption of EITF 07-03 did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB, affirmed the consensus of FASB Staff Position (FSP) Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 14-1 (APB 14-1), Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which applies to all convertible debt instruments that have a net settlement feature; which means that such convertible debt instruments, by their terms, may be settled either wholly or partially in cash upon conversion. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner reflective of the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. Previous guidance provided for accounting for this type of convertible debt instrument entirely as debt. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of FSP APB 14-1 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May, 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We are currently reviewing the effect, if any, the proposed guidance will have on our financial statement disclosures.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 19

In May, 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60. Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. That diversity results in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because of differing views about when a loss has been incurred under FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. Those clarifications will increase comparability in financial reporting of financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements. SFAS 163 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years; disclosure requirements in paragraphs 30(g) and 31 are effective for the first period (including interim periods) beginning after May 23, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 163 to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

On June 16, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 (FSP No. EITF 03-6-1), Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, to address the question of whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting. FSP EITF 03-6-1 indicates that unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to dividend payments should be included in earnings per share calculations. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the requirements of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 and the impact that its adoption will have on our results of operations and financial position.

In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue 07-5 (EITF 07-5), Determining whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock. EITF No. 07-5 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is not permitted. Paragraph 11(a) of SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities, specifies that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative but is both (a) indexed to our company’s own stock and (b) classified in stockholders’ equity in the statement of financial position would not be considered a derivative financial instrument. EITF 07-5 provides a new two-step model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the SFAS No. 133 paragraph 11(a) scope exception. We are currently evaluating the impact that adoption of EITF 07-5 will have on our financial statements.

In June 2008, FASB released a proposed SFAS, Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 141) (the proposed Statement), for a comment period that ended during August 2008. The proposed Statement would (a) expand the population of loss contingencies that are required to be disclosed, (b) require disclosure of specific quantitative and qualitative information about those loss contingencies, (c) require a tabular reconciliation of recognized loss contingencies and (d) provide an exemption from disclosing certain required information if disclosing that information would be prejudicial to an entity's position in a dispute. The proposed Statement would be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008, and for interim and annual periods in subsequent fiscal years. When and if the proposed Statement is approved in final form by FASB, we will evaluate whether the adoption of the proposed Statement will have any material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide disclosure for this item.

~~Gurata~~Forza ~~Gold~~Environmental Building Products, Inc. Form 10-K - ~~2009~~2010 Page 2016

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

~~GURATA~~Our ~~GOLD,~~audited ~~INC.(AN~~financial ~~EXPLORATION~~statements ~~STAGE COMPANY)~~are ~~FINANCIAL~~stated ~~STATEMENTSFOR~~in ~~THE~~United ~~YEARS~~States dollars ~~ENDED~~(US$) ~~MAY~~and 31are ~~2009~~prepared ~~AND 2008AND~~in ~~THE~~accordance ~~PERIOD~~with ~~FROM~~United ~~MAY~~States ~~26,~~Generally Accepted ~~2006~~Accounting ~~(INCEPTION)~~Principles. ~~TO MAY 31, 2009~~

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	22
BALANCE SHEETS	23
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS	24
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	25
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	26
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	27

The following audited financial statements are filed as part of this annual report:

~~Gurata~~Independent ~~Gold~~Auditor's Report, ~~Inc~~dated September 14, 2010. ~~Form~~Audited ~~10-K~~Consolidated -Balance Sheet as at May 31, 2010. Audited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2010 and for the year ended May 31, 2009. ~~Page~~Audited 21Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the year ended May 31, 2010 and for the year ended May 31, 2009. Audited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended May 31, 2010 and for the year ended May 31, 2009. Notes to the Financial Statements.

ToForza ~~the~~Environmental ~~Board~~Building ofProducts, ~~Directors~~Inc. ~~and~~Form ~~Stockholders~~10-K of- ~~Gurata~~2010 ~~Gold, Inc.~~Page 17

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
(FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC.)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2010 AND 2009
AND THE PERIOD FROM MAY 18, 2010 (INCEPTION OF DEVELOPMENT STAGE) TO MAY 31, 2010

BALANCE SHEETS	F-1

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS	F-2

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	F-3

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-4

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 18

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.
(formerly Gurata Gold, Inc.)

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc. (formerly Gurata Gold, Inc.) (the Company), ana ~~exploration~~Development ~~stage~~Stage ~~company~~Company, as of May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~ 2009 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for ~~the~~each of the years in the two-year period ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010, and ~~2008 and~~ for the period from May ~~inception~~18, 2010 (~~May~~inception ~~26, 2006~~of Development Stage) ~~through~~to May 31, ~~2009~~2010. ~~These~~The ~~financial~~Company’s management ~~statements~~is ~~are~~responsible ~~the~~for ~~responsibility~~these ~~of the~~financial ~~Company’s management~~statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our ~~audits~~audit.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The ~~company~~Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audits~~audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc. (formerly Gurata Gold, Inc.,) ana ~~exploration~~Development Stage ~~stage company~~Company, as of May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ~~then~~in the two-year period ended May 31, 2010, and for the period from ~~inception (~~May 2618, ~~2006~~2010 (inception of Development Stage) ~~through~~to May 31, ~~2009~~ 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company does not have the necessary working capital for its planned activity, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are described in Note 3 to the financial statements. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Madsen & Associates CPA’s, Inc. ~~Salt Lake City, Utah November 24, 2009~~

~~Gurata~~Madsen ~~Gold~~& Associates CPA’s, Inc. ~~Form~~Salt ~~10-K~~Lake -City, ~~2009 Page 22~~Utah

~~GURATA~~September ~~GOLD~~14, ~~INC.~~2010 ~~(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) BALANCE SHEETS~~

		May 31,			May 31,
		2009			2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	1,339		$	30,200
Deposit receivable		104			6,303
Total assets	$	1,443		$	36,503
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)
EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	21,853		$	11,494
Accrued administrative fees		1,876			3,675
Accrued professional fees		99			127
Advances payable		15,108			-
Total liabilities		38,936			15,296
Commitments and contingencies		-			-
Stockholders' (deficit) equity:
Common stock; authorized 75,000,000; $0.001 par value;
39,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at
May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2008		39,000			39,000
Additional paid in capital		76,250			76,250
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(152,743	)		(94,043	)
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity		(37,493	)		21,207
Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit) equity	$	1,443		$	36,503

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
(FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC.)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEETS

		May 31,			May 31,
		2010			2009
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash	$	50,890		$	1,339
Deposit receivable		109			104

Total assets	$	50,999		$	1,443

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	46,829		$	21,853
Accrued administrative fees		5,000			1,876
Accrued professional fees		-			99
Advances payable		33,183			15,108
Due to related parties		813			-


Total liabilities		85,825			38,936

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Stockholders' deficit:
Common stock; authorized 75,000,000; $0.001 par value; 39,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2010 and 2009		39,000			39,000
Additional paid in capital		76,250			76,250
Common stock subscribed		205,000			-
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(327,027	)		(152,743	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(28,049	)		-


Total stockholders' deficit		(134,826	)		(37,493	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	50,999		$	1,443

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

~~Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10~~F-K1 ~~- 2009 Page 23~~

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC.) (ANA ~~EXPLORATION~~DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		Year Ended						From May 26,
								From May 18, 2010
								2006 (Inception) to
								(Inception of
		May 31, 2009			May 31, 2008			May 31, 2009
		Year Ended May 31,						Development Stage)
		2010			2009			to May 31, 2010
Operating Expenses:
Administrative fees	$	103,~~875~~500		$	~~8,624~~-		$	223,~~999~~500
Bank charges and interest		~~179~~95			~~158~~-			~~452~~95
Consulting		7,~~391~~313			~~20,500~~-			277,~~891~~313
Donated rent					-			2,750
Rent		1,700			-			1,700
Donated services					-			5,500
Office		4,585			-			4,585
Exploration and development		1,716			15,366			21,058
Wages and Salaries		112,615			-			7,615
Office		-			123			123
Professional fees		3,241			-			3,241
Professional fees		36,067			28,698			64,907
Net loss from continuing operations		133,049			-			28,049
Regulatory		2,472			2,616			6,063
Discontinued operations		69,284			58,700			-
Impairment loss on mineral property costs		-			-			1,000
Net loss	$	(202,333	)	$	(58,700	)	$	(28,049	)
Net loss for the period	$	58,700		$	76,085		$	152,743
Net loss per share from continuing operations:
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Basic and diluted	$	0.00		$	0.00
Net loss per share from discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted		39,000,000			3239,~~007~~000,~~650~~000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

~~Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10~~F-K2 ~~- 2009 Page 24~~

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC.) (ANA ~~EXPLORATION~~ DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF ~~STOCKHOLDER~~ STOCKHOLDERS'S EQUITY FOR THE ~~YEARS~~ YEAR ENDED ~~MAY~~May 31, ~~2009~~2010 AND ~~2008~~2009 AND ~~FOR~~ THE PERIOD FROM MAY 2631, ~~2006~~2008 ~~(INCEPTION)~~ TO ~~MAY~~May 31, ~~2009~~2010

											~~Deficit~~		Deficit			Deficit
	Common Stock Issued	~~Common Stock Issued~~									~~Accumulated~~		Accumulated			Accumulated
							Additional	~~Additional~~		Common	~~During the~~		During the			During the
	Number of	~~Number of~~					Paid-in	~~Paid-in~~		Stock	~~Exploration~~		Exploration			Development
	Shares	~~Shares~~		Amount	~~Amount~~		Capital	~~Capital~~		Subscribed	~~Stage~~		Stage	~~Total~~		Stage			Total
Balance at May 26, 2006 (Inception)		-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Balance at May 31, 2008	39,000,000		$	39,000		$	76,250		$	-		$	(94,043	)	$	-		$	21,207
Net loss for the period		-			-			-			(500	)		(500	)
Net loss for the Year ended May 31, 2009	-			-			-			-			(58,700	)		-			(58,700	)
Balance at May 31, 2006		-			-			-			(500	)		(500	)
Balance at May 31, 2009	39,000,000			39,000			76,250			-			(152,743	)		-			(37,493	)
Common stock issued for cash		22,000,000			22,000			-			-			22,000
500,000 shares to be issued, at $0.21 per share, per an employment agreement - May 1, 2010	-			-						105,000			-			-			105,000
Donated services		-			-			8,250			-			8,250
Shares subscribed May 13, 2010	-			-						50,000			-			-			50,000
Net loss for the year ended May 31, 2007		-			-			-			(17,458	)		(17,458	)
Shares subscribed May 27, 2010	-			-			-			50,000			-			-			50,000
Balance at May 31, 2007		22,000,000			22,000			8,250			(17,958	)		12,292
Net loss for the Year ended May 31, 2010	-			-			-			-			(174,284	)		(28,049	)		(202,333	)
Common stock issued for cash		17,000,000			17,000			68,000			-			85,000
Balance at May 31, 2010	39,000,000		$	39,000		$	76,250		$	205,000		$	(327,027	)	$	(28,049	)	$	(34,826	)
Net loss for the year ended May 31, 2008		-			-			-			(76,085	)		(76,085	)
Balance at May 31, 2008		39,000,000			39,000			76,250			(94,043	)		21,207
Net loss for the year ended May 31, 2009		-			-			-			(58,700	)		(58,700	)
Balance at May 31, 2009		39,000,000		$	39,000		$	76,250		$	(152,743	)	$	(37,493	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

~~Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10~~F-K3 ~~- 2009 Page 25~~

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC.) (ANA ~~EXPLORATION~~DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

								From May 26,
								From May 18,
								2006
								2010
		Year Ended						(Inception) to
								(Inception of
		May 31, 2009			May 31, 2008			May 31, 2009
								Development
		Year Ended						Stage) to
		May 31, 2010			May 31, 2009			May 31, 2010
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(58202,~~700~~333	)	$	(7658,~~085~~700	)	$	(~~152~~28,~~743~~049	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net low to net cash used in operating activities:
Donated services and rent		-			-			8,250
Compensation expense for shares to be issued under an employment agreement		105,000			-			-
Impairment loss on mineral property costs		-			-			1,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Deposit receivable		~~6,199~~(5	)		~~(6,303~~	)		~~(104~~-	)
Accounts payable		107,~~359~~880			~~7,960~~			217,~~853~~880
Accrued administrative fees		(110,~~799~~651	)		~~(15~~	)		1(10,~~876~~651	)
Accrued professional fees		(2899	)		~~3,675~~			99-
Advances payable		1518,~~108~~075			1			~~15,108~~-
Net cash used in operating activities		(28,861	)		(70,767	)		(104,661	)
Due to related party		488						488
Deposit receivable related to discontinued operations					6,199
Accounts payable related to discontinued operations		17,096			10,359
Accrued administrative fees related to discontinued operations		13,775			(1,799	)
Accrued professional fees related to discontinued operations					(28	)
Advances payable related to discontinued operations					15,108
Due to related party related to discontinued operations		325
Net cash used in operating activities		(50,449	)		(28,861	)		(30,332	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of mineral properties		-			-			~~(1,000~~-	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			~~(1,000~~-	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash from issuance of common stock		-			85,000			107,000
Cash from subscription of common stock		100,000			-			50,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		-100,000			~~85,000~~-			~~107~~50,000
Net (decrease) increase in cash during the period		(28,861	)		14,233			1,339
Net increase (decrease) in cash during the period		49,551			(28,861	)		19,668
Cash, beginning of period		301,~~200~~339			1530,~~967~~200			-31,222
Cash, end of period	$	150,~~339~~890		$	301,~~200~~339		$	150,~~339~~890
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period
Taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

~~Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10~~F-K4 ~~- 2009 Page 26~~

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC. ) (ANA ~~EXPLORATION~~DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, ~~2009~~2010

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Operations

~~Gurata~~Forza ~~Gold~~Environmental Building Products, Inc. (“~~Gurata~~Forza”) was incorporated on May 26, 2006, under the laws of the State of Nevada. ~~Gurata~~Until May 17, 2010, Forza’s principal business iswas the acquisition and exploration of mineral resources in northwestern British Columbia, Canada. ~~Gurata~~On ~~has~~May ~~not~~18, ~~presently~~2010 Forza ~~determined~~announced ~~whether~~a change in its ~~properties~~direction to manufacture, market and distribute ~~contain~~the ~~mineral~~Artzer ~~reserves~~Z-Panel ~~that~~building ~~are~~product. ~~economically~~Accordingly, ~~recoverable~~the Company exited the Exploration Stage and entered the Development Stage on that date. In these notes, the terms “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” mean ~~Gurata~~Forza.

~~Exploration~~Development Stage

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company has not produced any revenues from its principal business and is ana ~~exploration~~development stage company ~~as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7~~, and follows ~~Statement~~Accounting ofStandard ~~Financial~~915 Development ~~Accounting~~Stage ~~Standard~~Entities (~~SFAS)~~AS ~~No. 7~~915), where applicable.

The Company is in the early ~~exploration~~development stage. In ~~an exploration~~a development stage company, management devotes most of its time to conducting ~~exploratory~~ set up work and developing its business. These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. The Company’s continuation as a going concern and its ability to emerge from the ~~exploration~~ development stage with any planned principal business activity is dependent upon ~~the~~ the continued financial support of its shareholders and its ability to obtain ~~the~~ the necessary equity financing and attain profitable operations.

Since the acquisition of the Artzer Z-Panel the Company has determined it will not continue to proceed with its exploration activities.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts in the accompanying financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the results of operations or financial position for any period presented.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the balance sheet and statement of cash flows, the Company considers all amounts on deposit with financial institutions and highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~May 31, 2009, the Company did not have any cash equivalents

Financial Instruments

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 the Company had approximately $50500 and $3050,~~000,~~ respectively in cash that was not insured. This cash is on deposit with a large chartered Canadian bank. As part of its cash management process, the Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of this financial institution. The Company has not experienced any losses in cash balances and does not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 27

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Financial Instruments (continued)

Foreign Exchange Risk

The Company is subject to foreign exchange risk for transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Foreign currency risk arises from the fluctuation of foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates relative to the United States dollar. The Company does not believe that it has any material risk due to foreign currency exchange.

~~Fair~~FORZA ~~Value~~ENVIRONMENTAL ofBUILDING ~~Financial~~PRODUCTS, INC. ~~Instruments~~(FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC. ) (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2010

On June 1, 2007, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 (SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis, until January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end entities. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which states that SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, (SFAS 13) and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under SFAS 13 are excluded from the provisions of SFAS 157, except for assets and liabilities related to leases assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value under SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, (SFAS 141) or SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, (SFAS 141(R)).

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 28

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

~~Level~~Fair 2Value -of ~~Inputs~~Financial other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.Instruments

~~Level~~On 3June -1, ~~Inputs~~2007, ~~that~~the ~~are~~Company ~~both~~adopted ~~significant~~Accounting Standard 820 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (AS 820). AS 820 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. AS 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value ~~measurement~~measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and ~~unobservable~~are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. The adoption of AS 820, as it relates to financial assets and financial liabilities, had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Level 1 -	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 -	Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 -	Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The Company’s financial instruments include cash, deposit receivable, accounts payable, accrued administrative fees, professional fees and advances payable. The fair value of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values due to their short maturities.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with ~~SFAS~~Accounting ~~No.~~Standard 52830 Foreign Currency ~~Translation~~Matters (AS 830), using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars. The Company has not to the date of these financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

Reclassifications

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
(FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC. )
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAY 31, 2010

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Accounting Estimates

The Company’s financial statements are based on a number of estimates, including accruals for estimated administrative and professional fees.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive Income (loss) reflects changes in equity that results from transactions and economic events from non-owner sources. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~May 31, 2009, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive ~~income~~ income (loss) and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive ~~income~~ income (loss) in the financial statements.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 29

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Mineral Property Costs

The Company has been in the exploration stage since its inception on May 26, 2006 and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized when incurred using the guidance in the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 04-02, Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets. The Company assesses the carrying costs for impairment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets at each fiscal quarter end. An impairment is recognized when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the mineral property. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the mineral property over its estimated fair value (see Note 5).

Asset Retirement Obligations

~~SFAS No. 143 (“SFAS 143”),~~ Accounting ~~for~~Standard 410 Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations (AS 410) addresses financial accounting and reporting for ~~obligations~~ obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the ~~associated~~ associated asset retirement costs. Specifically, ~~SFAS~~AS ~~143~~410 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. In addition, the asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the asset’s carrying value and subsequently allocated to expense over the asset’s ~~useful~~ useful life. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~May 31, 2009, the Company did not have any asset retirement obligations.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share (“EPS”)

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income per common share includes the potential dilution that could occur upon exercise of the options and warrants to acquire common stock computed using the treasury stock method which assumes that the increase in the number of shares is reduced by the number of shares which could have been repurchased by the Company with the proceeds from the exercise of the options and warrants (which were assumed to have been made at the average market price of the common shares during the reporting period).

Potential common shares are excluded from the diluted loss per share computation in net loss periods as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

At May 31, ~~2009~~2010, the Company had issued 39,000,000 common shares and had no outstanding options or warrants.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 30

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, ~~the Financial~~ Accounting ~~Standards~~Standard ~~Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R)~~718, ~~Share-Based~~Compensation ~~Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which~~– ~~is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for~~ Stock~~-Based~~ Compensation~~. SFAS~~ ~~123~~(RAS 718) was ~~effective~~brought ~~for~~into ~~public companies for the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005, supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No~~effect. 25AS ~~(APB~~718 ~~25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123(R)~~ eliminates the option to use ~~APB~~the ~~25’s~~ intrinsic value method of accounting and requires recording ~~expense~~ expense for stock compensation based on a fair value based method.

~~The~~FORZA ~~adoption~~ENVIRONMENTAL ofBUILDING ~~SFAS~~PRODUCTS, ~~123~~INC. (R)FORMERLY ~~did~~GURATA ~~not~~GOLD, ~~have~~INC. a) ~~material effect on~~ ~~the~~ (A ~~Company’s~~DEVELOPMENT ~~financial~~STAGE ~~condition~~COMPANY) or NOTES ~~results~~TO ofTHE ~~operations~~FINANCIAL ~~because~~STATEMENTS ~~since~~ ~~inception~~ MAY ~~the~~31, ~~Company~~2010 ~~has not entered into any share-based transactions.~~

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Income Taxes

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158 (“SFAS 158”),~~ ~~Employers’~~We ~~Accounting~~do ~~for~~not ~~Defined~~expect ~~Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). This statement requires an employer to recognize~~ the ~~over~~adoption ~~funded or under funded status~~ of aany ~~defined~~new ~~benefit~~accounting ~~postretirement~~pronouncements ~~plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and~~ to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity. This statement also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions. The Company will be required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008, or June 1, 2008 for the Company. We do not have a ~~defined benefit postretirement plan and thus the Adoption of SFAS 158 did not have a~~ material impact on our financial statements.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 31

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (SFAS 159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS 159 permits measurement of certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. If the fair value option is elected, the unrealized gains and losses are reported in earnings at each reporting date. Generally, the fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, as long as it is applied to the instrument in its entirety. The fair value option election is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. SFAS 159 was effective for the Company on June 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements as the Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its financial assets or liabilities.

In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3 requires that non-refundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities must be deferred and capitalized. As the related goods are delivered or the services are performed, or when the goods or services are no longer expected to be provided, the deferred amounts must be recognized as an expense. This issue is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and earlier application is not permitted. This consensus is to be applied prospectively for new contracts entered into on or after the effective date. The Company adopted EITF 07-03 on June 1, 2008. The adoption of EITF 07-03 did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB, affirmed the consensus of FASB Staff Position (FSP) Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 14-1 (APB 14-1), Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which applies to all convertible debt instruments that have a net settlement feature; which means that such convertible debt instruments, by their terms, may be settled either wholly or partially in cash upon conversion. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner reflective of the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. Previous guidance provided for accounting for this type of convertible debt instrument entirely as debt. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not expect the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May, 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any; the proposed guidance will have on its financial statement disclosures.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 32

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In May, 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60. Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. That diversity results in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because of differing views about when a loss has been incurred under FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. Those clarifications will increase comparability in financial reporting of financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements. SFAS 163 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years; disclosure requirements in paragraphs 30(g) and 31 are effective for the first period (including interim periods) beginning after May 23, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 163 did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

On June 16, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 (FSP No. EITF 03-6-1), Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, to address the question of whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting. FSP EITF 03-6-1 indicates that unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to dividend payments should be included in earnings per share calculations. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 and the impact that its adoption will have on its results of operations and financial position.

In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue 07-5 (EITF 07-5), Determining whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock. EITF No. 07-5 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is not permitted. Paragraph 11(a) of SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities, specifies that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative but is both (a) indexed to the Company’s own stock and (b) classified in stockholders’ equity in the statement of financial position would not be considered a derivative financial instrument. EITF 07-5 provides a new two-step model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the SFAS No. 133 paragraph 11(a) scope exception. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of EITF 07-5 will have on its financial statements.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 33

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued

In June 2008, FASB released a proposed SFAS, Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 141 (the proposed Statement), for a comment period that ended during August 2008. The proposed Statement would (a) expand the population of loss contingencies that are required to be disclosed, (b) require disclosure of specific quantitative and qualitative information about those loss contingencies, (c) require a tabular reconciliation of recognized loss contingencies and (d) provide an exemption from disclosing certain required information if disclosing that information would be prejudicial to an entity's position in a dispute. The proposed Statement would be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008, and for interim and annual periods in subsequent fiscal years. When and if the proposed Statement is approved in final form by FASB, the Company will evaluate whether the adoption of the proposed Statement will have any material impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”), which establishes general standards of accounting for, and requires disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 165 to have a material effect on its financial statements.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not generated any revenues since inception and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, confirmation of the Company’s interests in the underlying properties, and the attainment of profitable operations. The Company’s ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flows is dependent upon its ability to ~~locate profitable mineral properties,~~ generate revenues from its ~~mineral~~manufacturing ~~production~~and distribution business and control production costs. Based upon current plans, the Company expects to incur operating losses in future periods. At May 31, ~~2009~~2010, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $~~152~~355,~~743~~ 076 since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to generate sufficient revenues to cover operating costs in the future. These financial statements do not give any effect to any adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
(FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC. )
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAY 31, 2010

NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

~~All~~The ~~of the~~ Company’s ~~mineral~~paid ~~claims~~monthly ~~are~~rent ~~registered~~for inoffice ~~the~~space ~~name of~~to aour ~~former~~CFO ~~director~~ of $1,700 ~~the~~starting ~~Company and pursuant to a trust agreement are held~~ in ~~trust~~the onmonth ~~behalf~~ of ~~the Company (see Note 5)~~May.

AtNOTE ~~May~~5 ~~31,~~- ~~2009~~COMMON ~~and~~STOCK ~~May 31 2008, the Company was indebted to a former director in the amounts of $59 and $34, respectively. This debt was reclassified to accounts payable at November 30, 2008.~~

At May 31, 2009 and May 31 2008, the Company was indebted to its director in the amounts of $0. This director was paid $4,941 by the Company for consulting services for the year ended May 31, 2009.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 34

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 5 – UNPROVED MINERAL PROPERTY

On December 15, 2006, the Company acquired the Gate 1 mineral claim near Atlin, British Columbia, Canada, comprising an area of 376.49 hectares for $1,000. During the year ended May 31, 2007, the Company determined that the carrying amount of the mineral property was in excess of its estimated fair value and recognized an impairment loss on mineral property costs of $1,000 (see Notes 2 and 4).

The Company is required to incur approximately $2,748 (CDN$3,012) on or before February 10, 2010 and each year thereafter in exploration expenditures or pay the equivalent sum in cash in lieu of work, in order to retain title to the claim.

Due to prior work that was done on the claim the Company’s mineral claim is in good standing until February 10, 2012.

NOTE 6 - COMMON STOCK

On July 11, 2006 and August 23, 2006, the Company issued 3,000,000 and 19,000,000 common shares respectively, at $0.001 per share for cash of $22,000.

On November 30, 2007, the Company issued 17,000,000 common shares at $0.005 per share for cash of $85,000.

Common Stock Subscribed

On May 1, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 500,000 common shares valued at $105,000 or $0.21 per share as part of an employment agreement. The Company recorded the $105,000 as wages expense in these financial statements. As of the date of these financials statements, these shares have not been issued.

On May 13, 2010, a deposit of $50,000 was received for 250,000 common shares at $0.20 per share. (see note 8)

On May 27, 2010, a deposit of $50,000 was received for 250,000 common shares at $0.20 per share. (see note 8)

NOTE 6 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On May 17, 2010 the Company changed its focus from exploration of mineral properties, to manufacturing, marketing and distributing building products. The Company had the following losses from discontinued operations for the years ended May 31, 2009 and 2010.

Discontinued Operations:

	Year Ended May 31 2010	Year Ended May 31, 2009
Administrative fees	$6,125	$10,875
Bank charges and interest	328	179
Consulting	27,374	7,391
Exploration and development	Nil	1,716
Office	683	Nil
Wages and salaries	7,425	Nil
Professional fees	24,856	36,067
Regulatory expenses	2,493	2,472
Discontinued operations	$69,284	$58,700

FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
(FORMERLY GURATA GOLD, INC. )
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAY 31, 2010

NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense has not been recognized for the years ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 and no taxes were payable at May 31, ~~2009~~2010 or ~~2008~~2009, because the Company has incurred net operating losses (NOL’s) since its inception.

The Company’s ~~operating~~net losses for the years ended May 31, ~~2009 and~~2010 ~~2008~~and 2009, were:

	2009		2008
	2010		2009
$	58202,~~700~~333	$	7658,~~085~~700
$	58202,~~700~~333	$	7658,~~085~~700

At May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 the Company had the following deferred tax assets related to NOL’s. A 100% valuation allowance has been established as management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

		2009			2008
		2010			2009
Federal loss carryforwards	$	51120,~~933~~726		$	3151,~~975~~933
Less: valuation allowance		(51120,~~933~~726	)		(3151,~~975~~933	)
	$	-		$	-

~~Gurata~~The ~~Gold,~~Company’s ~~Inc.~~valuation ~~Form~~allowance ~~10-K~~increased -during 2010 and 2009 ~~Page~~by 35$68,793 and $19,958 respectively.

GURATA GOLD, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAY 31, 2009

NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES (continued)

The Company’s valuation allowance increased during 2009 and 2008 by $19,958 and $25,869 respectively.

The Company had the following NOL carryforwards at May 31:

		2009			2008
	2010			2009
$	$355,076	~~152,793~~	$	$152,743	~~94,043~~
$	$355,076	~~152,793~~	$	$152,743	~~94,043~~

The federal NOL’s ~~expire~~begin ~~through~~to ~~May~~expire ~~31,~~in ~~2030~~2026. The Company is a Nevada corporation and is not subject to state taxes.

~~Gurata~~NOTE ~~Gold,~~8 ~~Inc.~~– ~~Form~~SUBSEQUENT ~~10-K~~EVENTS ~~- 2009 Page 36~~

On July 8, 2010, 500,000 common shares were issued from deposits received in May 2010. (see note 6)

On July 8, 2010, 120,000 common shares were issued at $0.25 per share for cash of $30,000.

On July 19, 2010 the company changed its name to Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

On July 29, 2010, 280,000 common shares were issued at $0.25 per share for cash of $70,000.

On August 2, 2010, 400,000 common shares were issued at $0.25 per share for cash of $100,000.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through September 14, 2010, which is the date the financial statements were issued.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Since inception on May 26, 2006, there were no disagreements with our accountants on any matter of accounting principle or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure. In addition, there were no reportable events as described in Item 304(b) of Regulation S-K that occurred within ~~Gurata~~Forza’s two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim periods. ~~Gurata~~Forza’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm from inception to the current date is Madsen & Associates CPA’s, Inc., 684 East Vine Street, #3, Murray, Utah, 84107.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this annual report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer and our principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)) as of May 31, ~~2009~~2010. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer and our principal accounting officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, our management concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and ~~reporting~~ reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and that such information was ~~not~~ accumulated or communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure~~, for the reasons listed below in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting~~.

Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as required by Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404 A. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our Board of Directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of ~~the~~our ~~Company~~company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, ~~2009~~2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control –Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment, management identified ~~material~~ ~~weaknesses~~significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting.

AThe ~~material~~matters ~~weakness~~involving isinternal acontrols ~~control~~and ~~deficiency,~~procedures orthat management considered to be significant deficiencies under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a ~~combination~~functioning audit committee and lack of ~~deficiencies~~a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control ~~over~~objectives; (3) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting ~~such~~with ~~that~~respect ~~there~~to isthe requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (4) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and areporting ~~reasonable~~processes. ~~possibility~~The ~~that~~aforementioned asignificant ~~material~~deficiencies ~~misstatement~~were ofidentified by our ~~annual~~Chief orFinancial ~~interim~~ Officer in connection with the audit of its financial statements ~~will~~as ~~not~~of beMay ~~prevented~~31, or2010 ~~detected~~and onthese amatters ~~timely~~were ~~basis~~communicated to its management.

~~Gurata~~Forza ~~Gold~~Environmental Building Products, Inc. Form 10-K - ~~2009~~2010 Page 3730

~~The~~As ~~matters~~a ~~involving~~result ~~internal controls and procedures that management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards~~ of the ~~Public~~ ~~Company~~significant ~~Accounting~~deficiencies ~~Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting~~ in ~~ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required~~ internal ~~controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with~~ control ~~objectives;~~over ~~(3) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and~~ financial reporting ~~with~~described ~~respect~~above, tomanagement ~~the requirements~~has ~~and~~concluded ~~application~~that, as of USMay ~~GAAP~~31, ~~and~~2010, ~~SEC~~Forza’s ~~disclosure~~internal ~~requirements;~~control ~~and (4) ineffective controls~~ over ~~period end~~ financial ~~disclosure and~~ reporting ~~processes.~~ ~~The aforementioned material weaknesses~~ were ~~identified~~not byeffective ~~our~~based ~~Chief Financial~~on ~~Officer in connection with~~ the ~~audit of its financial statements as of~~ ~~May~~criteria ~~31,~~in ~~2009 and these matters were communicated to its management.~~

~~As a result of the material weaknesses in internal control over~~ ~~financial reporting described above, management has concluded that, as of May 31, 2009, Gurata’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria in~~ Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

~~Management~~ The COO and CFO believes ~~that~~the deficiencies in internal control are mitigated by the ~~material~~limited ~~weaknesses~~number ~~set~~of ~~forth above~~transactions ~~did~~each ~~not~~year ~~have~~and the engagement of an ~~affect~~outside onpublic ~~our~~accounting ~~financial~~firm ~~results.~~to ~~Management~~assist ~~also~~us ~~believes~~with period end financial disclosure and reporting ~~that~~processes and the ~~lack~~preparation of afinancial ~~functioning~~statements. ~~audit~~As ~~committee~~such, our COO and ~~lack~~CFO ofdoes anot ~~majority~~believe ofthe ~~outside directors~~deficiencies have a material effect on ~~our~~the ~~board~~accuracy and completeness of ~~directors~~our ~~caused~~financial reporting and ~~continues~~disclosure toas ~~cause~~included anin ~~ineffective oversight~~this inreport or that the ~~establishment~~deficiencies ~~and~~constitute ~~monitoring~~a material weakness such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the ~~required~~Company’s ~~internal~~annual ~~controls over~~or interim financial ~~reporting~~statements will not be prevented or deterred on a timely basis.

We are committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment and when funds are available, we will create a position within our accounting and finance team to segregate duties consistent with our control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function by: i) appointing one or more outside directors to our board of directors who will also be appointed to the audit committee of our company resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls over financial reporting; and ii) preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists that will set forth procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who will also be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board. In addition, management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the following ~~material~~immaterial weaknesses: (i) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (ii) ineffective controls over period end financial close and reporting processes. Further, management believes that the hiring of additional ~~personnel~~ personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge will result proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. Additional personnel will also provide the cross training needed to support our company if personnel turn-over issues within the department occur. This coupled with the appointment of additional outside directors will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues our company may encounter in the future.

Management will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and is committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

Our independent auditors have not issued an attestation report regarding our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, this annual report does not include such a report. We are not required to have, nor have we, engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform an audit of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit our company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Subsequent to May 31, 2009, management completed its assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting and found the internal controls to be ineffective. As a result of such assessment, in September 2009 management decided that certain changes to our internal controls over financial reporting are required, as discussed above, and those changes should materially affect our internal control over financial reporting in the future when implemented.

~~Gurata~~Forza ~~Gold~~Environmental Building Products, Inc. Form 10-K - ~~2009~~2010 Page 3831

Item 9B. Other Information

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, we reported all information that was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.

All directors of our Company hold office until the next annual meeting of the security holders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers of our Company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:

Name	Position Held with the Company	Age	Date First Elected or Appointed
Shaun P. Davis	President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer, Corporate Secretary and Director	43	August 7, 2008
Charles Thompson Slay	President, COO, Corporate Secretary and Director	64	April 29, 2010
Paul Artzer	Vice President of Research and Development	72	May 1, 2010
Michael Lee	Chief Financial Officer	52	May 10, 2010

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during at least the past five years of each director, executive officer and key employee of our Company, indicating the person’s principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.

~~Shaun~~Charles P.Thompson ~~Davis~~Slay - President, ~~CEO~~COO, ~~CFO, Treasurer,~~ Corporate Secretary and Director

Mr. ~~Davis~~Slay ~~has~~is ~~been~~an ~~the~~international ~~president~~construction ~~and~~executive ~~CEO~~with ~~of our company since~~over ~~August~~thirty ~~2008~~years ~~and~~experience ~~the~~in ~~CFO~~corporate ofmanagement, ~~our~~new ~~company~~business ~~since~~partnerships ~~September~~and organizational ~~2008.~~expansions ~~During~~in the ~~past five~~United ~~years,~~States ~~Mr. Davis has been a realtor~~ and ~~worked~~various inforeign ~~property management since 1990~~countries.

Mr. Slay was International Operations Manager for Ryland Trading, Ltd., a division of The Ryland Group, where he initiated joint ventures and introduced panelized system building on a global scale. He was Vice President of Construction Operations for Port Liberte, a $900,000,000 development in the shadow of the Statue of Liberty. As the Director General of Construction Project Management Oversight, SA., Mr. Slay acted as country manager for Wheeling International, Fuller International Development, and American Homes, SA de CV in Mexico.

Mr. Slay served as Vice President of the US/Mexico Chamber of Commerce and is involved in various civic organizations.

Michael Lee, Chief Financial Officer

Starting with Bell Atlantic Corporation as an audit manager in 1990, Michael Lee rose swiftly through the ranks to Controller, Financial Operations Manager, and finally Chief Financial Officer of the National Telecommunications Alliance for the seven Regional Bell Operating Companies in 1996. Along the way, he administered employee benefits; was responsible for the budgeting and implementation of all accounting methods, procedures and systems for the new Bell Atlantic Long Distance Telephone subsidiary; and developed banking and investor relationships. Mike was with the company from revenues of $0.00 until the sale of the NTA to SAIC for $700 Million. Subsequently, as Vice President of Finance for e.spire Communications, Michael oversaw three private placements and a secondary equity offering with Goldman Sachs. He managed all SEC and IRS reporting and filings for the company. Mike left Virginia in 2002 to start his own CPA firm in Carlsbad, California after a period as Chief Financial Officer for Software AG where he revamped the financial systems and oversaw the financial structuring of three software company mergers totalling $28,000,000.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 32

Mike received his M. S., Taxation and a B. S., in Accounting and Business, from the University of Baltimore. He is a certified Public Accountant in Maryland and California and received his Employee Benefits Certification from the Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania.

Michael Lee is an experienced Chief Financial Officer with a record of success in strategic financial planning/forecasting, business development, equity and debt offerings, venture capital, mergers and acquisitions, road shows, operations, construction, cost reduction, financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and reporting, and auditing.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by ~~Gurata~~Forza to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

1.	any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.	any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations and other minor offences;

3.	being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4.	being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 39

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.

Name	Number of Late Reports	Number of Transactions Not Reported on a Timely Basis	Failure to File Required Forms
Shaun P. Davis	1(1)	1(1)	1(1)

(1) The executive officer, director or holder of 10% or more of our common stock failed to file a Form 5 – Annual Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities.

Nomination Procedure for Directors

We do not have a standing nominating committee; recommendations for candidates to stand for election as directors are made by the board of directors. We have not adopted a policy that permits shareholders to recommend candidates for election as directors or a process for shareholders to send communications to the board of directors.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committee that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is "independent" as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We believe that the members of our board of directors are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our board of directors.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 33

Audit Committee

Currently our audit committee consists of our entire board of directors.

During fiscal ~~2009~~2010 ~~aside from quarterly review teleconferences,~~ there were no meetings held by this committee. The business of the audit committee was conducted though ~~these teleconferences and by~~ resolutions consented to in writing by all the members and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the audit committee.

As of May 31, ~~2009~~2010, our company did not have a written audit committee charter or similar document.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a financial code of ethics that applies to all of our executive officers and employees, including our ~~CEO~~COO and CFO.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 40

As adopted, financial code of ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships.
information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable to ensure full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents that ~~GURATA~~FORZA files with, or submits to, government agencies and in other public communications.
compliance with the rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.
acting in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing one's independent judgment to be subordinated.
respecting the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of one's work, except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of one's work will not be used for personal advantage.
sharing job knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to stakeholders needs.
proactively promote and be an example of ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers, in the work environment and in the community.
responsible use of, and control over, all ~~GURATA~~FORZA assets and resources employed by, or entrusted to yourself, and your department.
full and active support and cooperation of ~~GURATA~~FORZA's Officers, Sr. Staff, and ~~and~~ all employees in the adherence to this Financial Code of Ethics.
prompt reporting to the ~~CEO~~COO or CFO any conduct believed to be in violation of law or business ethics or in violation of any provision of this Code of Ethics, including any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a conflict. Further, to promptly report to the Chair of ~~GURATA~~FORZA's Board of Directors such conduct if by the ~~CEO~~COO or CFO or if they fail to correct such conduct by others in a reasonable period of time.

We undertake to provide any person with a copy of its financial code of ethics free of charge. Please contact ~~Shaun~~Michael ~~Davis~~Lee at ~~206~~706-~~779~~931-~~5013~~6789 to request a copy of our code of ethics.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

(a) our principal executive officer; (b) each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008; and (c) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008,

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 34

	(b)	each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009; and

	(c)	up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 41

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Charles T. Slay(1) President, COO, and Secretary	2010 2009	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	12,000 N/A	12,000 N/A
Michael Lee (2) CFO	2010 2009	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	3,000 N/A	3,000 N/A
Paul Artzer (4) VP Research and Development	2010 2009	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	105,000 N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	6,000 N/A	111,000 N/A
Shaun P. Davis⁽⁵⁾ Former President, CEO, CFO, and Secretary	2010 2009	2010 2009	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	1,148 4,000	1,148 4,000
Filberto Gurat⁽⁶⁾ Former President, CEO and CFO	2010 2009	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A	NIL N/A

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Shaun P. Davis(1) President, CEO, CFO, and Secretary	2009 2008 2007	N/A N/A N/A	N/A N/A N/A	N/A N/A N/A	N/A N/A N/A	N/A N/A N/A	N/A N/A N/A	4,000 N/A N/A	4,000 N/A N/A
Filberto Gurat(2) Former President, CEO and CFO	2009 2008 2007	N/A Nil Nil	N/A Nil Nil	N/A Nil Nil	N/A Nil Nil	N/A Nil Nil	N/A Nil Nil	N/A 5,000 Nil	N/A 5,000 Nil

	1.	Mr. Slay was appointed president, chief operating officer and Chief Financial Officer on April 29, 2010, he resigned as Chief Financial Officer on May 10, 2010.

	2.	Michael Lee was appointed chief financial officer on May 10, 2010.

	3.	Paul Artzer was appointed vice president of research and development on May 1, 2010.

	4.	Mr. Davis was appointed president and chief executive officer on August 7, 2008 and as chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary on September 11, 2008. Mr. Davis resigned as chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary on April 29, 2010.

	5.	Mr. Gurat was appointed president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer on. Mr. Gurat resigned as president and chief financial officer on August 7, 2008 and as chief financial officer on September 11, 2008.

1.2010 ~~Mr.~~Grants ~~Davis~~of ~~was~~Plan-Based ~~appointed president and chief executive officer on August 7, 2008 and as chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary on September 11, 2008.~~Awards

2.No ~~Mr.~~equity ~~Gurat~~or ~~was~~non-equity ~~appointed~~awards ~~president, chief~~were ~~executive~~granted ~~officer~~to ~~and~~the ~~chief~~named executives ~~financial~~in ~~officer on~~ 2010. ~~Mr. Gurat resigned as president and chief financial officer on August 7, 2008 and as chief financial officer on September 11, 2008~~

2009 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

No equity or non-equity awards were granted to the named executives in 2009.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

~~The~~No ~~particulars of unexercised options, stock that has not vested and~~ equity ~~incentive~~awards ~~plan~~were ~~awards~~outstanding ~~for~~as ~~our~~of ~~named~~the ~~executive~~year ~~officers~~ended ~~are~~May ~~set~~31, ~~out~~2010. ~~in the following table:~~

Options Awards Stock Awards Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) Shaun P. Davis President, CEO, CFO, and Secretary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Option Exercises

During our Fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010 there were no options exercised by our named officers.

~~Gurata~~Forza ~~Gold~~Environmental Building Products, Inc. Form 10-K - ~~2009~~2010 Page 4235

Compensation of Directors

WeOther dothan ~~not~~as set out below, we have ~~any~~no ~~agreements~~formal ~~for~~plan for compensating our directors for their ~~services~~service in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase common shares ofas awarded by our ~~common~~board of directors or (as to future stock asoptions) ~~awarded~~a bycompensation committee which may be established. Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. Our board of directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director. No director received and/or accrued any compensation for their services as a director, including committee participation and/or special assignments.

WeOn ~~have~~May ~~determined~~1, ~~that~~2010, ~~none~~we ofentered ~~our~~into ~~directors~~an ~~are~~executive ~~independent~~employment ~~directors,~~agreement aswith ~~that~~Paul ~~term~~J. isArtzer ~~used~~whereby inMr. ~~Item~~Artzer ~~7(d)(3)(iv)(B)~~will ofact ~~Schedule~~as ~~14A~~vice ~~under~~president ~~the~~of ~~Securities~~research ~~Exchange~~development. ~~Act~~Pursuant to the terms of ~~1934~~this agreement, asMr. ~~amended~~Artzer will receive 500,000 ~~and~~restricted asshares ~~defined~~of bycommon ~~Rule 4200(a)(15)~~stock ofand ~~the~~an ~~NASDAQ~~annual ~~Marketplace~~base ~~Rules~~salary of $72,000.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of November 18, 2009, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares, as well as by each of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Class(1)
Shaun P. Davis 11730 NE 107th Place Kirkland, Washington 98033	22,000,000 common stock	56.4%
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group(1)	22,000,000 common stock	56.4%

a)	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners (more than 5%)

(1) Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on November 18, 2009. As of November 18, 2009, there were 39,000,000 shares of our Company’s common stock issued and outstanding

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Class⁽¹⁾
Thomas Macgavok Long P.O. Box 134 Claremont, VA 23899	11,000,000 common stock	27.3%
Charles Thompson Slay Sofia Camarena de Jimenez #35 Cabercera Municipal, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico	11,000,000 common stock	27.3%

b)	Security Ownership of Management

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Class⁽¹⁾
Charles Thompson Slay Sofia Camarena de Jimenez #35 Cabercera Municipal, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico	11,000,000 common stock	27.3%
Paul Artzer⁽²⁾ 415 Honeycomb Circle Driftwood, TX 78619	500,000 common stock	1.2%
Michael Lee 5927 Balfour Court, Suite 112 Carlsbad, CA 92008	Nil	0.0%
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group⁽¹⁾	11,500,000 common stock	28.5%

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 36

(1)	Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on August 30, 2010. As of August 30, 2010, there were 40,300,000 shares of our Company’s common stock issued and outstanding.

(2)	As of the date of this annual report, these shares have not yet been issued.

Changes in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our Company.

Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since the year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the year end for the last three completed fiscal years.

In return for Feliberto Gurat holding the one mineral claim in trust for our company, we have agreed to make payments in lieu of valid exploration work on behalf of Mr. Gurat, if required, to keep the Gate 1 Claim in good standing with the Province of British Columbia. We anticipate the amount of the payments to be made on behalf of Mr. Gurat to be approximately $2,000 for next year and $4,000 annually thereafter.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 43

Feliberto Gurat, a former CFO and director, donated services and rent to our company that are recognized on our financial statements. From inception on May 26, 2006 to May 31, 2009, we recognized a total of $5,500 for donated services at a rate of $500 per month and $2,750 for donated rent at a rate of $250 per month.

Director independence

We currently act with one (1) director, consisting of ~~Shaun~~Charles Thompson PSlay. ~~Davis.~~ We have determined that our director is not an “independent director” as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

Currently our audit committee consists of our entire board of directors. We currently do not have nominating, compensation committees or committees performing similar functions. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors.

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committee who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

From inception to present date, we believe that the members of our audit committee and the board of directors have been and are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

The promoters of our company are our directors and officers.

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 37

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2009~~2010 and for fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2008~~2009 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including tax return preparation and tax compliance for these fiscal periods were as follows:

	Year Ended
	May 31, 2009 $	May 31, 2008 $
	May 31, 2010 $	May 31, 2009 $
Audit Fees	1213,000	1012,~~500~~000
Audit Related Fees	Nil	Nil
Tax Fees	~~1,350~~675	1,~~000~~350
All Other Fees	Nil	Nil
Total	13,~~350~~675	1113,~~500~~350

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our independent auditors are engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

approved by our audit committee (which consists of our entire board of directors); or
entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the board of directors, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the board of directors is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the board of directors' responsibilities to management.

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 44

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules.

(a)	Financial Statements
	(1)	Financial statements for our Company are listed in the index under Item 8 of this document
	(2)	All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not material or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(b)	Exhibits

~~(incorporated~~Forza byEnvironmental ~~reference~~Building ~~to our current report~~Products, onInc. Form 8 10-K ~~filed~~- on2010 ~~January~~Page ~~30, 2009)~~38

Exhibit	Description
(3)	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).
3.2	By-Laws (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16,
	2007).
(10)	Material Contracts
10.1	Property agreement dated December 15, 2006 between Kenneth Ralfs and Feliberto Gurat as Trustee for Gurata (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).
10.2	Trust agreement dated January 17, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).
(14)	Code of Ethics
14	Financial Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).
(31)	Section 302 Certifications
31	Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32)	Section 906 Certification
32	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b)

Exhibits

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 45

Exhibit	Description

(3)	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).

3.2	By-Laws (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).

3.3	Articles of Merger (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2010).

(10)	Material Contracts

10.1	Property agreement dated December 15, 2006 between Kenneth Ralfs and Feliberto Gurat as Trustee for Forza (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).

10.2	Trust agreement dated January 17, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).

10.3	Executive Employment Agreement dated May 1, 2010 between Paul J. Artzer (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2010).

10.4*	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 12, 2010.


(14)	Code of Ethics

14	Financial Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 16, 2007).

(31)	Section 302 Certifications

31.1*	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Charles Thompson Slay.

31.2*	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Michael Lee.

(32)	Section 906 Certification

32.1*	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Charles Thompson Slay.

32.2*	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Michael Lee.

*filed herewith

Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.

Form 10-K - 2010

Page 39

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	GURATA GOLD, INC.
	FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
	(Registrant)
Dated: December 3, 2009	/s/ Shaun P. Davis
Dated: September 14, 2010	/s/ Charles Thompson Slay
	Shaun P. Davis
	Charles Thompson Slay
	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
	President, Secretary and director
	Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	director
Dated: September 14, 2010	/s/ Michael Lee
	(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
	Michael Lee
	Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
	Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated: December 3, 2009	/s/ Shaun P. Davis
Dated: September 14, 2010	/s/ Charles Thompson Slay
	Shaun P. Davis
	Charles Thompson Slay
	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
	President, Secretary and director
	Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	director
	(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
	Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Gurata Gold, Inc. Form 10-K - 2009 Page 46

Filing Compare · FORZA ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.