UNITED ~~STATES~~STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

~~SECURITIES~~Form ~~AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~10-Q

~~Washington~~(Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, ~~D.C.~~2010 ~~20549~~

~~FORM~~or ~~10-Q~~

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2010
OR
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______________ to _______________

Commission ~~file~~File ~~number~~Number 000-53692

HELI ELECTRONICS CORP.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada N/A (~~Formerly~~State ~~Dong~~or ~~Fang~~other ~~Minerals,~~jurisdiction ~~Inc~~of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)

~~(Exact~~No. ~~name~~50 ofFengxiang ~~registrant~~South asRoad, ~~specified~~Jinaggao inTown, ~~its~~Baiyun District, ~~charter~~Guangzhou, P.R. China(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

~~NEVADA~~(86) 020-36356228(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A(~~State~~Former orname, ~~other~~former ~~jurisdiction~~address ofand ~~incorporation~~former fiscal oryear, ~~organization~~if changed since last report)

~~Room~~Indicate ~~A606,~~by ~~Dacheng~~check ~~International~~mark ~~Centre~~whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.[ X ] YES [ ] NO

78Indicate ~~Dongsihuanzhonglu~~by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act

~~Chaoyang~~Large ~~District,~~accelerated ~~Beijing,~~filer ~~P.R.~~[ ~~China~~] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (~~Address~~as defined in Rule 12b-2 of ~~principal~~the ~~executive~~Exchange ~~offices,~~Act[ ~~including~~] ~~zip~~YES ~~code.)~~[ X ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (86§232.405 of this chapter) ~~010-5962~~during ~~5606~~the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).[ ] YES [ ] NO

~~(Registrant’s~~APPLICABLE ~~telephone~~ONLY ~~number,~~TO ~~including~~ISSUERS ~~area~~INVOLVED ~~code)~~IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

~~Indicate~~Check ~~by check mark~~ whether the ~~issuer~~registrant ~~(1)~~ has filed all ~~reports~~documents and reports required to be filed by ~~Section~~Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act ~~during~~after the distribution ~~preceding~~of 12securities ~~months~~under ~~(or~~a ~~for~~plan ~~such~~confirmed ~~shorter~~by ~~period~~a ~~that~~court.[ ~~the~~] ~~registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.~~ YES [~~X] NO~~ [ ] NO

~~Indicate~~APPLICABLE byONLY ~~check~~TO ~~mark~~CORPORATE whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (SS 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [ ] NO [ X ]ISSUERS

Indicate ~~by check mark whether~~ the ~~registrant~~number isof ashares ~~large~~outstanding ~~accelerated~~of ~~filer,~~each anof ~~accelerated~~the issuer’s ~~filer,~~classes aof ~~non-accelerated~~common ~~filer~~stock, oras aof ~~smaller reporting company. See~~ the ~~definitions~~latest ofpracticable ~~“large~~date. ~~accelerated filer~~266, ~~“accelerated filer~~000,”000 common ~~“non-accelerated~~shares ~~filer,”~~issued and ~~“smaller~~outstanding ~~reporting~~as ~~company” in Rule 12b-2~~ of ~~the~~August ~~Exchange~~10, ~~Act. (Check one):~~2010

~~Large~~Table ~~Accelerated~~of ~~Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ] Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller Reporting Company [X] (Do not check if smaller reporting company)~~Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES [X] NO [ ]

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	14
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	14
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		14
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	14
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	14
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	14
Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	15
Item 5.	Other Information	15
Item 6.	Exhibits	15

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicated the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 720,720,000 as of May 28, 2010.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Heli Electronics Corp.
(Formerly Dong Fang Minerals, Inc.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
(Expressed in US Dollars)
				April 30,		January 31,
				2010		2010
				(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	30,362	$	43,922
Total current assets				30,362		43,922
Mineral property acquisition costs, less reserve for
	impairment of $4,625 and $4,625, respectively			-		-
Total Assets			$	30,362	$	43,922
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	19,062	$	5,685
	Due to related party			35,505		35,505
Total current liabilities				54,567		41,190
Stockholders' Equity
	Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value;
		authorized 100,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding		-		-
	Common Stock, $0.00001 par value;
		authorized 12,000,000,000 shares,
		issued and outstanding 720,720,000 and 720,720,000 shares, respectively,		9,207		9,207
	Additional paid-in capital			93,443		93,443
	Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage			(124,855)		(97,918)
Total stockholders' equity				(22,205)		4,732
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity			$	32,362	$	45,922
See notes to financial statements.

F-1

Heli Electronics Corp.
(Formerly Dong Fang Minerals, Inc.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
(Expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)
			Three Months Ended April 30, 2010		Three Months Ended April 30, 2009		Period from November 7, 2007 (Date of Inception) to April 30, 2010
Revenue		$	-	$	-	$	-
Costs and expenses
	Mineral property exploration and carrying costs		-		-		3,668
	General and administrative		460		295		35,022
	Professional fees		26,477		5,789		81,540
	Impairment of mineral property acquisition costs		-		-		4,625
Total costs and expenses			26,937		6,084		124,855
Net Loss		$	(26,937)	$	(6,084)	$	(124,855)
Net loss per share
	Basic and diluted	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
	Basic and diluted		720,720,000		720,720,000
See notes to financial statements.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~F-2~~Item 1. Financial Statements

Heli Electronics Corp.
(Formerly Dong Fang Minerals, Inc.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
For the Period November 7, 2007 (Inception) to April 30, 2010
(Expressed in US Dollars)
		Common Stock, $0.00001 par value				Additional Paid-in		Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration		Total Stockholders' Equity
		Shares		Amount		Capital		Stage		(Deficiency)
Common stock issued
November 2007		600,000,000	$	6,000	$	(5,950)	$	-	$	50
Net loss		-		-		-		(20,958)		(20,958)
Balance - January 31, 2008		600,000,000		6,000		(5,950)		(20,958)		(20,908)
Sale of shares in public
	offering at $0.000833 per share	120,720,000		1,207		99,393		-		100,600
Net loss		-		-		-		(44,285)		(44,285)
Balance -January 31, 2009		720,720,000		7,207		93,443		(65,243)		35,407
Net loss								(32,675)		(32,675)
Balance -January 31, 2010		720,720,000		7,207		93,443		(97,918)		2,732
Unaudited:
Net loss		-		-		-		(26,937)		(26,937)
Balance - April 30, 2010		720,720,000	$	7,207	$	93,443	$	(124,855)	$	(24,205)
See notes to financial statements.

Heli Electronics Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

F-3

		June 30,		December 31,
		2010		2009
		(Unaudited)

Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	682,054	$	270,775
Accounts receivable, net		11,916,057		3,335,423
VAT receivable		277,477		-
Inventories, net		3,649,152		1,084,061
Advance to suppliers		734,926		183,661
Total current assets		17,259,666		4,873,920
Property and equipment, net		20,677		15,338
Total Assets	$	17,280,343	$	4,889,258

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	8,372,331	$	1,782,663
Accrued liabilities		133,682		62,868
Income tax payable		-		742,959
Total current liabilities		8,506,013		2,588,490
Due to related parties		2,963,559		-
Total Liabilities		11,469,572		2,588,490

Shareholders' Equity
Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		-		-
Common Stock $0.0001 par value, 12,000,000,000 shares authorized, 266,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and 144,280,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009, respectively		2,660		1,443
Additional paid-in capital		47,340		70,632
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		18,662		(4,129	)
Statutory reserve fund		223,421		223,421
Retained earnings		5,518,688		2,009,401
Total shareholders' equity		5,810,771		2,300,768
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	17,280,343	$	4,889,258

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Heli Electronics Corp.
(Formerly Dong Fang Minerals, Inc.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)
				Three Months Ended April 30, 2010		Three Months Ended April 30,2009		Period from November 7, 2007 (Date of Inception) to April 30, 2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
	Net loss		$	(26,937)	$	(6,084)	$	(124,855)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss
		to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
		Impairment of mineral property acquisition costs		-		-		4,625
	Change in operating assets and liabilities:
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		13,377		4,480		19,062
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities				(13,560)		(1,604)		(101,168)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
	Acquisition of mineral property			-		-		(4,625)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities				-		-		(4,625)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
	Increase (decrease) in due to related party			-		-		35,505
	Proceeds from sales of common stock			-		-		100,650
Net cash provided by financing activities				-		-		136,155
Increase (decrease) in cash				(13,560)		(1,604)		30,362
Cash - beginning of period				43,922		77,556		-
Cash - end of period			$	30,362	$	75,952	$	30,362
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
	Interest paid		$	-	$	-	$	-
	Income taxes paid		$	-	$	-	$	-
See notes to financial statements.

Heli Electronics Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

F-4

		Three Months ended						Six Months ended
		June 30,						June 30,
		2010			2009			2010			2009
		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)


Revenue	$	24,852,753		$	7,617,186		$	43,693,579		$	14,023,300
Cost of Goods Sold		(21,756,454	)		(6,618,793	)		(38,229,970	)		(12,246,822	)
Gross Profit		3,096,299			998,393			5,463,609			1,776,478

General and administrative
Selling Expenses		219,175			82,405			403,751			152,920
General and administrative		227,614			103,319			373,417			211,435
Depreciation		1,126			631			2,036			988
Total operating expenses		447,915			186,355			779,204			365,343

Income before income taxes		2,648,384			812,038			4,684,405			1,411,135
Income taxes		(664,872	)		(203,010	)		(1,175,118	)		(355,037	)

Net income	$	1,983,512		$	609,028		$	3,509,287		$	1,056,098

Other Comprehensive Income
Foreign currency translation adjustment		11,222			(3,617	)		22,791			(3,275	)
Comprehensive Income	$	1,994,734		$	605,411		$	3,532,078		$	1,052,823

Earnings per share - basic and diluted	$	0.01		$	0.00		$	0.02		$	0.01

Weighed-average shares outstanding - basic and diluted		187,082,637			144,280,000			165,799,558			144,280,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Heli Electronics Corp. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity For the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Formerly Dong Fang Minerals, Inc.)

										Accumulated
	Common Stock				Additional			Statutory		Other			Retained		Total
					Paid-in			Reserve		Comprehensive			Earnings		Shareholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Fund		Income			(Unrestricted)		Equity



Balances, December 31, 2009	144,280,000		1,443		70,632			223,421		(4,129	)		2,009,401		2,300,768
Retain of 121,720,000 shares by original Dong Fang shareholders	121,720,000		1,217		(23,292	)		-		-			-		(22,075	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment					-			-		22,791			-		22,791
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)					-			-		-			3,509,287		3,509,287
Balance at June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)	266,000,000	$	2,660	$	47,340		$	223,421	$	18,662		$	5,518,688	$	5,810,771

~~(An~~The ~~Exploration~~accompanying ~~Stage~~notes ~~Company)~~are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

April 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 1 Organization and Business Operations

Heli Electronics Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 7, 2007 as Dong Fang Minerals, Inc. The Company is an Exploration Stage Company as defined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915. On November 17, 2007, the Company acquired a mineral property claim located in the Province of British Columbia, Canada; on April 8, 2010, the claim was forfeited due to nonpayment.

On March 18, 2010, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of a British Virgin Island corporation to be formed in the future in consideration of 144,280,000 (after a 120 for 1 forward stock split) restricted shares of our common stock. The BVI corporation will, prior thereto, have acquired all of Guangzhou Heli Information Technology Co., Ltd., a People’s Republic of China corporation (“Heli”). Further, the Company’s chief executive officer and former chief executive officer are to cancel a total of 600,000,000 (after a 120 for 1 forward stock split) shares of Company common stock prior to closing. The letter of intent is not binding upon any parties thereto and is subject to the execution of a definitive agreement.

On March 29, 2010, Heli Electronics Corp., formerly known as Dong Fang Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”), filed Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State to effect a merger with its wholly owned subsidiary, Heli Electronics Corp. and assume the subsidiary’s name. The subsidiary was incorporated entirely for the purpose of effecting this name change and the merger did not affect the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or corporate structure in any other way.

On April 5, 2010, we increased our authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 to 12,000,000,000 shares and authorized a 120 for 1 forward stock split to increase our issued and outstanding shares from 6,006,000 to 720,720,000 shares. Effective May 13, 2010, the stock split occurred. Share information and per share amounts in the accompanying financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this stock split.

Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements have been prepared on a “going concern” basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, as of April 30, 2010, the Company had negative working capital and a stockholders’ deficiency of $24,205. Further, since inception, the Company has incurred a net loss of $124,855. These factors create substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company plans to improve its financial condition by obtaining new financing. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing this objective. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

F-5

Heli Electronics Corp. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Formerly Dong Fang Minerals, Inc.)

		Three Months ended
		June 30,
		2010			2009
		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)

Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net Income	$	3,509,287		$	1,056,098
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		2,036			988
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(8,566,723	)		(3,326,028	)
VAT Receivable		(277,477	)		47,407
Advance to suppliers		(550,499	)		-
Inventories, net		(2,560,570	)		(802,614	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		6,652,785			4,768,870
Customer deposit		-			(125,395	)
Corporate tax payable		(746,058	)		353,898
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(2,537,219	)		1,973,224

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchase of equipment		(7,284	)		(11,491	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(7,284	)		(11,491	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net proceeds of share issuance		(22,075	)
Due to related parties		2,963,559
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,941,484			-

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		14,298			(3,269	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		411,279			1,958,464
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		270,775			60,753

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	682,054		$	2,019,217


Supplemental disclosure information:
Income taxes paid	$	1,486,670		$	-
Interest paid	$	-		$	-

~~(An~~The ~~Exploration~~accompanying ~~Stage~~notes ~~Company)~~are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

April 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

Interim Financial Statements

The unaudited financial statements as of April 30, 2010, for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, and for the period November 7, 2007 (inception) to April 30, 2010, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position as of April 30, 2010 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended April 30, 2010 and 2009. The financial data and other information disclosed in these notes to the interim financial statements related to these periods are unaudited. The results for the three months period ended April 30, 2010 is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter of the entire year ending January 31, 2011. The balance sheet at January 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended January 31, 2010 as included in our report on Form 10-K filed May 3, 2010.

Mineral Property Costs

The Company has been in the exploration stage since its incorporation and inception on November 7, 2007 and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized and are charged to operations as the value is impaired. Exploration costs are expensed until proven and probable reserves are established. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property are capitalized. Such costs are amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserves.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar.

F-6

Heli Electronics Corp. Notes to Financial Statements and disclosures For six months ended June 30, 2010

~~(Formerly~~NOTE ~~Dong~~1. ~~Fang~~ORGANIZATION ~~Minerals,~~AND ~~Inc.)~~BUSINESS OPERATION

~~(An~~On ~~Exploration~~June ~~Stage~~14, ~~Company)~~2010, the Heli and Heli BVI entered into a Share Exchange Agreement whereby, Heli agreed to acquire all of the share capital in Heli BVI in exchange for 144,280,000 shares of Heli’s common stock. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger and recapitalization whereby the Heli BVI was considered the accounting acquirer.

~~NOTES~~Prior TOto ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS~~consummation of the share exchange and the issuances and cancellations contemplated therein, Heli Electronics had 720,720,000 shares common stock issued and outstanding following a 120 for 1 forward split. Upon the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement Heli Electronics issued 144,280,000 shares of common stock to the Heli Shareholders and cancelled an aggregate of 599,000,000 shares of common stock held by its former director and officers. Upon completion, Heli Electronics had 266,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Of the 266,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of the closing of the share exchange, 121,720,000 were held by the former shareholders of Heli Electronics, 144,280,000 shares were held by the equity owners of Heli Guangzhou. Upon closing, liabilities of Heli Electronics assumed by the Company were less than $10,000.

~~April~~The 30Company became a wholly owned subsidiary of Heli Electronics upon the closing of the share exchange on June 15, 2010.

~~(Unaudited)~~NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~Financial~~ a. ~~Instruments~~Basis of presentation

The ~~carrying~~accounting ~~values~~policies and methods followed in preparing these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are those used by Company as described in Note 2 of the ~~Company’s~~notes to consolidated financial ~~instruments,~~statements included ~~consisting~~in ofthe ~~cash~~Annual Report on Form 8K. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three- and ~~cash~~six-month ~~equivalents~~periods ended June 30, ~~accounts~~2010 and ~~payable~~2009 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and ~~accrued~~the ~~liabilities,~~rules of the Securities and Exchange ~~due~~Commission and do not conform in all respects to ~~related~~the ~~party~~disclosure and information that is required for annual consolidated financial statements. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, ~~approximate~~but ~~their~~does ~~fair~~not ~~values~~include ~~due~~all todisclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~short~~United ~~maturity~~States of ~~these~~America. These ~~instruments~~interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the most recent annual consolidated financial statements of the Company.

~~Environmental~~In ~~Costs~~the opinion of management, all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary for fair statement have been included in these interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.

~~Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are charged to operations or capitalized as appropriate~~b. ~~Expenditures~~Basis that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are charged to operations. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of consolidation ~~these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or the Company’s commitment to a plan of action based on the then known facts.~~

~~Income~~The consolidated ~~Taxes~~financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries Heli Guangzhou and Xinde. All significant inter-company transactions and balance have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Income taxes are accounted for under the assets and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, "Earnings per Share". ASC Topic 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS excludes potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Share Based Payment”. To date, the Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

F-7

Heli Electronics Corp. Notes to Financial Statements and disclosures For six months ended June 30, 2010

~~(Formerly~~ c. ~~Dong~~Use ~~Fang~~of ~~Minerals,~~estimates ~~Inc.)~~

~~(An~~The preparation ~~Exploration~~of ~~Stage~~financial ~~Company)~~statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~NOTES~~d. TOForeign ~~FINANCIAL~~currency ~~STATEMENTS~~translation

~~April~~The ~~30,~~exchange ~~2010~~rates used for foreign currency translation were as follows (USD$1 = HKD):

(Unaudited)

Period Covered	Balance Sheet Date Rates	Average Rates

Year ended December 31, 2009	7.8000	7.8000
Six months ended June 30, 2009	7.8000	7.8000
Six months ended June 30, 2010	7.8000	7.8000

~~Note~~The ~~3 Mineral~~exchange ~~Property~~rates used for foreign currency translation were as follows (USD$1 = RMB):

Pursuant to a mineral property purchase agreement dated November 17, 2007, the Company acquired a 100% undivided right, title and interest in the Dong Fang minerals claim, located 15 miles northwest of Penticton, British Columbia, Canada, for $4,625. The Tenure Number ID is 555886, which expired April 8, 2010. The property was in the name of Liu Jian Hong held by him in trust for the Company.

Period Covered	Balance Sheet Date Rates	Average Rates

Year ended December 31, 2009	6.8540	6.9372
Six months ended June 30, 2009	6.8446	6.8227
Six months ended June 30, 2010	6.8087	6.8171

~~On November 17, 2007, the Company received an evaluation report from a third party consulting firm recommending an exploration program with a total estimated cost of $92,500~~e. ~~Due~~Recently toissued ~~lack~~accounting ~~of working capital, the Company never completed this program. At January 31, 2008, the Company provided a $4,625 reserve for impairment of the mining property acquisition costs.~~pronouncements

OnWe ~~November~~do ~~12,~~not ~~2009,~~expect the ~~first~~adoption ~~phase~~ of ~~the~~recently ~~exploration~~issued ~~program~~accounting pronouncements ~~described in the report dated November 17, 2007 was completed in part. Samples were taken from four locations~~ to ~~determine~~have ~~the~~a ~~progressive~~significant ~~sequence~~impact toon ~~the~~our ~~continuance~~results of ~~the~~operations, financial ~~fulfillment~~position ofor ~~the~~cash ~~Phase I recommendations~~flow.

~~The~~NOTE ~~Phase I samples were taken from the granitic host rock of the quartz veins which were reported to contain significant mineral values~~3. ~~The~~INVENTORY purpose of the sampling program was to determine the potential for potential economic mineral values in the granitic host rock. Based on the results of the Phase I exploration program, the consulting firm advised the Company on November 12, 2009 that there was no surficial indication that the granitic host rocks to the mineralized quartz veins have potential to hosting economic mineralization and that any additional exploration work on the Property was not recommended.

~~Note~~Inventory ~~4 Due~~includes tofinished ~~Related~~goods ~~Party~~purchased from third party suppliers. Inventory consists of the following:

The $35,505 amount due to Jiang Hong Liu at April 30, 2010 is due the former chief executive officer of the Company (to November 2, 2009), is non-interest bearing, and is due on demand.

		June 30,		December31
		2010		2009
DVD	$	57,955	$	47,654
Stereo		3,591,197		1,036,407
Inventory, net	$	3,649,152	$	1,084,061

~~Note~~NOTE ~~5 Common~~4. ~~Stock~~INCOME TAX

InHeli ~~November~~Information ~~2007~~Tech. (Guangzhou) Co., ~~the~~Ltd. ~~Company~~was ~~issued~~established in Guangzhou, PRC and was entitled to a ~~total~~preferential ofEnterprise ~~600~~Income Tax (”EIT”) rate. Heli Information Tech. (Guangzhou) Go.,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~Ltd. is governed by the Income Tax Law of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~PRC concerning the private-run enterprises, which are generally subject to ~~two~~tax ~~directors~~at ~~for~~a ~~total~~statutory ~~cash~~rate ~~proceeds~~of 25% on income reported in the statutory financial statements after appropriate tax adjustments in 2010 and 2009. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had tax payable of $500 and $742,959, respectively.

On September 30, 2008, the Company sold a total of 120,720,000 shares of common stock to 45 investors at $0.000833 per share for total cash proceeds of $100,600 and closed its public offering.

At April 30, 2010, there are no outstanding stock options or warrants.

F-8

Heli Electronics Corp. Notes to Financial Statements and disclosures For six months ended June 30, 2010

~~(Formerly~~The ~~Dong~~provision ~~Fang~~for ~~Minerals,~~taxes ~~Inc.)~~on earnings consisted of:

(An Exploration Stage Company)

		Six months ended June 30,
		2010		2009
Current income taxes expenses:
PRC Enterprises Income Taxes:	$	1,175,118	$	355,037
United States Federal Income Taxes		-		-
Total	$	1,175,118	$	355,037

~~NOTES~~A TOreconciliation ~~FINANCIAL~~between ~~STATEMENTS~~the income tax computed at the U.S. statutory rate and the Company’s provision for income tax is as follows:

April 30, 2010

	Six Months ended June 30,
	2010	2009
U.S. statutory rate	34%	34%
Foreign income not recognized in the U.S.	-34%	-34%
PRC preferential enterprise income tax rate	25%	25%
Permanent differences related to other expenses	0%	0%
Provision for income tax	25%	25%

~~(Unaudited)~~Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

~~Note~~The ~~6 Income~~Company ~~Taxes~~accounts for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with applicable accounting standards, which prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. These accounting standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

NoBased ~~provisions~~on ~~for income taxes have been recorded since~~ the Company ~~has incurred net losses since inception. Based on management~~’s ~~present assessment~~evaluation, the Company has ~~not~~concluded that ~~yet~~there ~~determined~~are itno tosignificant beuncertain ~~more likely than not that a deferred~~ tax ~~asset~~positions ofrequiring ~~$42,451~~recognition ~~attributable to the future utilization of the net operating loss carryforward of $124,855 as of April 30, 2010 will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has maintained~~ in its ~~100% allowance against the deferred tax asset in the~~ financial statements. The Company will continue to review this valuation allowance and make adjustments as appropriate. The $124,855 net operating loss carryforward expires $20,958 in 2028, $44,285 in 2029, $32,675 in 2030 and $26,937 in 2031.

~~Current~~The ~~United~~Company ~~States~~may ~~income~~from ~~tax~~time ~~laws~~to ~~limit~~time ~~the~~be ~~amount~~assessed ofinterest ~~loss~~or penalties ~~available~~by tomajor betax ~~offset~~jurisdictions. ~~against~~In ~~future~~the ~~taxable~~event ~~income~~it ~~when~~receives aan ~~substantial~~assessment ~~change~~for interest inand/or ~~ownership occurs. Therefore~~penalties, ~~the~~it ~~amount~~will ~~available~~be toclassified ~~offset~~in ~~future~~the ~~taxable~~financial ~~income~~statements ~~may~~as tax ~~be limited~~expense.

~~F-9~~NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY BALANCE AND TRANSCATION

On 9th May of 2010, Mr. Qiu, Xin, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company loaned approximately $2.9 million to the Company. This loan is non-interest bearing and has no maturity date.

~~ITEM~~Item 2. ~~MANAGEMENT'S~~ ~~DISCUSSION~~Management’s ~~AND~~Discussion ~~ANALYSIS~~and ORAnalysis ~~PLAN~~of OFFinancial ~~OPERATION.~~Condition and Results of Operations

~~This section of the report includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance.~~ Forward~~-looking~~ ~~statements~~Looking ~~are~~Statements often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this report. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions.

~~Plan~~This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology including "could", "may", "will", "should", "expect", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "predict", "potential" and the negative of ~~Operation~~these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

~~For~~While ~~all~~these ~~intents~~forward-looking statements, and ~~purposes,~~any weassumptions upon which they are abased, ~~start-up~~are ~~company. We~~made ~~discontinued~~in ~~mining~~good ~~operations~~faith onand ~~April~~reflect 8,our ~~2010~~current judgment ~~when~~regarding the ~~claim~~direction weof ~~had~~our ~~the~~business, ~~right~~actual toresults ~~explore~~will ~~was~~almost always ~~forfeited~~vary, ~~due~~sometimes tomaterially, ~~nonpayment. We~~from ~~have~~any ~~not~~estimates, ~~generated~~predictions, projections, assumptions or ~~realized~~other ~~any~~future ~~revenues~~performance ~~from~~suggested ~~our~~in ~~business~~this ~~operations~~report.

~~Our~~Results ~~auditor~~of ~~has~~Operations ~~issued~~– aThree ~~going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve~~ months ~~unless~~Ended weJune ~~obtain~~30, ~~additional~~2010 ~~capital to pay our bills.~~and 2009

~~Our~~The ~~officer~~following ~~and~~summary ~~sole~~of ~~director~~our ~~are~~results ~~unwilling~~of tooperations ~~make~~should ~~any~~be read ~~commitment~~in toconjunction ~~loan~~with usour ~~any~~financial ~~money~~statements atfor ~~this time. At~~ the ~~present~~three ~~time,~~month weperiod ended ~~have~~June ~~not made any arrangements to raise additional cash. If we need additional cash and can't raise it~~30, we2010 ~~will~~which ~~either~~are ~~have~~included ~~to suspend activities until we do raise the cash, or cease activities entirely~~herein. ~~Other than as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing plans. Our success or failure will be determined by what we find under the ground.~~

OnOur ~~March~~operating ~~18,~~results ~~2010,~~for ~~we entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire all of~~ the ~~issued~~three ~~and~~months ~~outstanding~~ended ~~shares~~June ~~of a British Virgin Island (“BVI”) corporation to be formed in the future in consideration of 144~~30,~~280,000~~ ~~restricted shares of our common stock. The BVI corporation is to~~2010, for ~~prior~~the ~~thereto,~~three ~~acquire~~months ~~Guangzhou~~ended ~~Heli~~June ~~Information Technology Co.~~30, ~~Ltd.,~~2009 ~~a People’s Republic of China corporation (“Heli”). The letter of intent also contains other provisions relating to the cancellation of common shares held by Company related parties~~ and the ~~proposed~~changes ~~change~~between ofthose ~~control~~periods for of the ~~Company. The~~respective ~~letter~~items ofare ~~intent~~summarized isas not binding upon any parties thereto and is subject to the execution of a definitive agreement. As of the date of this report, we have not executed a definitive agreement and there is no assurance we will do so in the future.follows:

Ms. Lu has agreed to advance funds to pay the costs of filing reports with the SEC in the event the Company does not have the funds to do so. Ms. Lu’s commitment to paying such costs is oral and not in writing. At the present time, we have not made any arrangements to raise additional cash. If we need additional cash and can’t raise it, we will either have to suspend operations until we do raise the cash, or cease operations entirely. Other than as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing plans.

	Three months Ended June 30, 2010 $	Three months Ended June 30, 2009 $	Change Between Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 $
Revenue	24,852,753	7,617,186	17,235,567
Cost of Goods Sold	21,756,454	6,618,793	15,137,661
Selling expenses	219,175	82,405	136,770
General and administrative	227,614	103,319	124,295
Depreciation	1,126	631	495
Net income for the period	1,983,512	609,028	1,374,484

Revenues

We had revenues of $24,852,753 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to revenues of $7,617,186 during the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase is a result of higher market demand for existing customers and the development of ten new customers during the period.

Cost of Sales

Our cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were $21,756,454 compared to $6,618,793 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in our cost of sales is mainly due to the increase in sales and our gross margin was relatively consistent with the prior year.

~~Results~~Selling ~~of Operations~~Expenses

~~From~~We ~~Inception~~had onselling ~~November~~expenses 7of $219,175 ~~2007~~during tothe ~~April~~three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to selling expenses of $82,405 during the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase is mainly due to an expansion of sales personnel, an increase in transportation expenses and quarterly bonuses.

InGeneral ~~November~~and ~~2007, the Company acquired one mineral claim in British Columbia, Canada (which was forfeited in April 2010).~~Administrative

We ~~have~~had nogeneral ~~revenues~~and administrative expenses of $227,614 ~~have~~during the ~~had~~three ~~losses~~months ~~since~~ended ~~inception~~June 30, 2010 compared to general and ~~rely~~administrative expenses ~~upon~~of $103,319 during the ~~sale~~three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase is mainly due to the expansion of our ~~securities~~business ~~and~~to ~~loans~~keep ~~from~~up with the increased demand of our ~~officers~~products. In addition, we incurred additional administrative expenses, such as embankment protection cost levied by the local government and ~~directors~~stamp tax, which are due to ~~fund~~the ~~operations~~increase in sales.

OnResults ~~September 30, 2008, we issued 120,720,000 shares~~ of ~~our~~Operations ~~common~~– ~~stock~~Six ~~pursuant~~months toEnded aJune ~~public offering. The offering was set at $0.000833 per share and the Company raised $100~~30,~~600~~ in2010 ~~the offering.~~and 2009

~~Since~~The ~~inception,~~following wesummary ~~have~~of ~~used~~our ~~the~~results ~~proceeds~~of ~~from~~operations ~~the~~should ~~public~~be read ~~offering~~in ~~and~~conjunction ~~loans~~with ~~from~~our ~~related~~financial ~~party~~statements tofor ~~fund~~the ~~our~~Six ~~operations~~month period ended June 30, 2010 which are included herein.

OnOur ~~March~~operating ~~18,~~results ~~2010,~~for ~~we entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire all of~~ the ~~issued~~Six ~~and~~months ~~outstanding~~ended ~~shares~~June ~~of a British Virgin Island (“BVI”) corporation to be formed in the future in consideration of 144~~30,~~280,000~~ ~~restricted shares of our common stock. The BVI corporation is to~~2010, for ~~prior~~the ~~thereto,~~Six ~~acquire~~months ~~Guangzhou~~ended ~~Heli~~June ~~Information Technology Co.~~30, ~~Ltd.,~~2009 ~~a People’s Republic of China Corporation (“Heli”). The letter of intent also contains other provisions relating to the cancellation of common shares held by Company related parties~~ and the ~~proposed~~changes ~~change~~between ofthose ~~control~~periods of for the ~~Company. The~~respective ~~letter~~items ofare ~~intent~~summarized isas ~~not binding upon any parties thereto and is subject to the execution of a definitive agreement.~~follows:

We currently do not own any properties or have the right to conduct exploration activities on any property.

	Six months Ended June 30, 2010 $	Six months Ended June 30, 2009 $	Change Between Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 $
Revenue	43,693,579	14,023,300	29,670,279
Cost of Goods Sold	38,229,970	12,246,822	25,983,148
Selling expenses	403,751	152,920	250,831
General and administrative	373,417	211,435	161,982
Depreciation	2,036	988	1,048
Net income for the period	3,509,287	1,056,098	2,453,189

~~Limited Operating History; Need for Additional Capital~~Revenues

~~There~~We ishad norevenues ~~historical~~of ~~financial~~$43,693,579 ~~information~~during ~~about~~the ussix ~~upon~~months ~~which~~ended toJune 30, ~~base~~2010 anas ~~evaluation~~compared ofto ~~our~~revenues ~~performance. We~~of ~~are~~$14,023,300 anduring ~~exploration~~the ~~stage~~three ~~corporation~~months ~~and~~ended June ~~have~~30, ~~not generated any revenues from operations~~2009. We ~~cannot~~The ~~guarantee~~increase weis ~~will~~a beresult ~~successful~~of inhigher ~~our~~market ~~business~~demand ~~operations. Our~~for ~~business~~existing customers isand ~~subject to risks inherent in~~ the ~~establishment~~development of a17 new ~~business~~customers ~~enterprise,~~during ~~including~~the ~~limited capital resources~~period.

WeCost ~~have~~of no assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.Sales

Our cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $38,229,970, compared to our cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009, which were $12,246,822. The increase in our cost of sales is mainly due to the increase in sales and our gross margin was relatively consistent with the prior year.

Selling Expenses

We had selling expenses of $403,751 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to selling expenses of $152,920 during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase is a result of: 1) more sales persons were hired thus more wages and benefit costs. 2) more sales results in more cost for carrier and delivery. 3) higher commission expenses were paid to sales persons due to rapid growth of sales revenue.

~~Liquidity~~General and ~~Capital Resources~~Administrative

AsWe had general and administrative expenses of $373,417 during the ~~date~~six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to general and administrative expenses of ~~this~~$211,435 ~~report~~during the six months ended June 30, we2009. ~~have~~The ~~yet~~increase tois mainly ~~generate~~due ~~any~~to ~~revenues~~the ~~from~~expansion of our business ~~operations~~to keep up with the increased demand of our products. In addition, we incurred additional administrative expenses, such as embankment protection cost levied by the local government and stamp tax, which are due to the increase in sales.

OnLiquidity ~~April~~and 5,Financial ~~2010,~~Condition ~~we split our shares of common stock on the basis of 120 for 1. All of the figures in this report reflect this stock split.~~

OnWorking ~~September 30, 2008, we issued 120,720,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to a public offering. The offering was set at $0.000833 per share and the Company raised $100,600 in the offering.~~Capital

In November 2007, we issued 600,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exemption from registration continued in Section S of the Securities Act of 1933. The purchase price of the shares was $50. This was accounted for as an acquisition of shares. Through April 30, 2010, Jian Hong Liu, our former chief executive officer, loaned us a total of $35,505 to help finance operations. The amount owed to Mr. Liu is non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand. Further the agreement with Mr. Liu is oral and there is no written document evidencing the agreement.

		At		At
		June 30, 2010		December 31,
				2009
Current assets	$	17,259,666	$	4,873,920
Current liabilities		8,506,013		2,588,490
Working capital	$	8,753,653	$	2,285,430

AsCash ~~of April 30, 2010, our total assets were $30,362 and our total liabilities were $ 54,567.~~Flows

The Company currently has approximately $30,362 of cash on hand.

		Six months Ended
		June 30
		2010			2009
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(2,537,219	)	$	1,973,224
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities		(7,284	)		(11,491	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		2,941,484			Nil
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		14,298			(3,269	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	411,279		$	1,958,464

~~Recent~~Operating ~~accounting pronouncements~~Activities

InNet ~~June 2009,~~cash ~~the~~used ~~Financial~~by ~~Accounting~~operating ~~Standards~~activities ~~Board~~was ~~(FASB)~~$2,537,219 ~~issued~~for ~~a standard that established~~ the six ~~FASB~~months ~~Accounting~~ended ~~Standards~~June ~~Codification~~30, ~~(ASC)~~2010 ~~and~~compared ~~amended~~with ~~the~~cash ~~hierarchy~~provided ofby ~~generally~~operating activities ~~accepted accounting principles (ASC) and amended the hierarchy~~ of ~~generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) such that the ASC became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. The ASC did not change current U.S. GAAP~~$1,973,224 ~~but~~in ~~was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all~~ the ~~authoritative~~same ~~literature~~period ~~related to a particular topic~~ in one place. All previously existing accounting standard documents were superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New accounting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 ~~are communicated by the FASB through Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs)~~. The ~~Company~~difference ~~adopted~~was ~~the~~largely due ~~ASC~~to onincreased ~~July 1,~~purchases ~~2009. This standard did not have an impact on the Company’s results~~ of ~~operations~~inventory orduring ~~financial condition. However~~2010, ~~throughout~~and ~~the~~our ~~notes~~accounts toreceivable balance ~~the~~increased ~~financial~~significantly ~~statements~~in ~~references that were previously made to various former authoritative U~~2010.~~S. GAAP pronouncements have been changed to coincide with the appropriate section of the ASC.~~

InInvesting December 2007, the FASB issued and, in April 2009, amended a new business combinations standard codified within ASC 805, which changed the accounting for business acquisitions. Accounting for business combinations under this standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Certain provisions of this standard impact the determination of acquisition-date fair value of consideration paid in a business combination (including contingent consideration); exclude transaction costs from acquisition accounting; and change accounting practices for acquisition-related restructuring costs, in-process research and development, indemnification assets, and tax benefits. Through April 30, 2010, this standard has had no impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $7,284 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $11,491 in the same period in 2009.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $2,941,484 compared to $Nil for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was mainly attributable to a $2,941,484 loan from shareholder in 2010.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

InCritical ~~April 2009,~~Accounting the FASB issued an accounting standard which provides guidance on (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly declined and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly. The standard also amended certain disclosure provisions for fair value measurements and disclosures in ASC 820 to require, among other things, disclosures in interim periods of the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value as well as disclosure of the hierarchy of the source of underlying fair value information on a disaggregated basis by specific major category of investment. For the Company, this standard was effective prospectively beginning July 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.Policies

InRevenue April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which modifies the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities and changes the existing impairment model for such securities. The standard also requires additional disclosures for both annual and interim periods with respect to both debt and equity securities. Under the standard, impairment of debt securities will be considered other-than-temporary if an entity (1) intends to sell the security, (2) more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost, or (3) does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis (even if the entity does not intend to sell). The standard further indicates that, depending on which of the above factor(s) causes the impairment to be considered other-than-temporary, (1) the entire shortfall of the security’s fair value versus its amortized cost basis or (2) only the credit loss portion would be recognized in earnings while the remaining shortfall (if any) would be recorded in other comprehensive income. The standard requires entities to initially apply its provisions to previously other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities existing as of the date of initial adoption by making a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The cumulative-effect adjustment potentially reclassifies the noncredit portion of a previously other-than-temporarily impaired debt security held as of the date of initial adoption from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.Recognition

InOur ~~April 2009,~~company ~~the~~generates ~~FASB~~revenues ~~issued~~from anthe ~~accounting~~sales ~~standard~~of ~~regarding~~audio ~~interim~~and video ~~disclosures~~electronic ~~about fair value of financial instruments~~products. ~~The~~Sales ~~standard~~are ~~essentially~~recognized ~~expands~~when the ~~disclosure~~following ~~about~~four ~~fair~~revenue criteria ~~value~~are ofmet: ~~financial~~persuasive ~~instruments~~evidence ~~that~~of ~~were~~an ~~previously~~arrangement ~~required~~exists, ~~only~~delivery ~~annually to also be required for interim period reporting. In addition~~has occurred, the ~~standard~~selling ~~requires~~price ~~certain~~is ~~additional~~fixed ~~disclosures~~or ~~regarding~~determinable, ~~the methods~~ and ~~significant~~collectability ~~assumptions~~is reasonably ~~used~~assured. toSales ~~estimate~~are ~~the~~presented ~~fair~~net of value ofadded ~~financial~~tax ~~instruments~~(VAT). ~~The~~No ~~adoption~~return allowance ofis ~~this~~made ~~standard~~as ~~did~~product ~~not~~returns ~~have~~are ainsignificant ~~material~~based ~~impact~~ on ~~the Company’s results of operations or financial condition~~historical experience.

InItem ~~May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard regarding subsequent events~~3. ~~This~~Quantitative ~~standard incorporates into authoritative accounting literature certain guidance that already existed within generally accepted auditing standards, with the requirements concerning recognition~~ and ~~disclosure~~Qualitative ofDisclosures ~~subsequent~~About ~~events~~Market remaining essentially unchanged. This guidance addresses events which occur after the balance sheet date but before the issuance of financial statements. Under the new standard, as under previous practice, an entity must record the effects of subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date and must disclose but not record the effects of subsequent events which provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date. This standard added an additional required disclosure relative to the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that is the date on which the financial statements were issued. For the Company, this standard was effective beginning July 1, 2009.Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president (also our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2010, the end of our second quarter covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our president (also our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president (also our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance in the reliability of our financial reports as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We are not aware of any legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which our property is the subject. None of our directors, officers, affiliates, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of our voting securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder are (i) a party adverse to us in any legal proceedings, or (ii) have a material interest adverse to us in any legal proceedings. We are not aware of any other legal proceedings that have been threatened against us.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

In June 2009, the FASB issued a new standard regarding the accounting for transfers of financial assets amending the existing guidance on transfers of financial assets to, among other things, eliminate the qualifying special-purpose entity concept, include a new unit of account definition that must be met for transfers of portions of financial assets to be eligible for sale accounting, clarify and change the derecognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for as a sale, and require significant additional disclosure. The standard is effective for new transfers of financial assets beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]

Item 5.	Other Information

~~In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard that revised the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities~~None. The modifications include the elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, a new approach for determining who should consolidate a variable-interest entity, and changes to when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity. The standard is effective January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard, but would not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

InItem ~~August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No~~6. ~~2009-05,~~ Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides additional guidance on how companies should measure liabilities at fair value under ASC 820. The ASU clarifies that the quoted price for an identical liability should be used. However, if such information is not available, a entity may use, the quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities traded as assets, or another valuation technique (such as the market or income approach). The ASU also indicates that the fair value of a liability is not adjusted to reflect the impact of contractual restrictions that prevent its transfer and indicates circumstances in which quoted prices for an identical liability or quoted price for an identical liability traded as an asset may be considered level 1 fair value. This ASU is effective October 1, 2009. This standard has not had a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.Exhibits

In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-12, Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent), that amends ASC 820 to provide guidance on measuring the fair value of certain alternative investments such as hedge funds, private equity funds and venture capital funds. The ASU indicates that, under certain circumstance, the fair value of such investments may be determined using net asset value (NAV) as a practical expedient, unless it is probable the investment will be sold at something other than NAV. In those situations, the practical expedient cannot be used and disclosure of the remaining actions necessary to complete the sale is required. The ASU also requires additional disclosures of the attributes of all investments within the scope of the new guidance, regardless of whether an entity used the practical expedient to measure the fair value of any of its investments. This ASU is effective October 1, 2009. This standard has not had a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Exhibit	Exhibit
Number	Description

31.1	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, that provides amendments to the criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. As a result of these amendments, multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements will be separated in more circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. The ASU does this by establishing a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available. A vendor will be required to determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. This ASU also eliminates the residual method of allocation and will require that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the overall arrangement proportionally to each deliverable based on its relative selling price. Expanded disclosures of qualitative and quantitative information regarding application of the multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement guidance are also required under the ASU. The ASU does not apply to arrangements for which industry specific allocation and measurement guidance exists, such as long-term construction contracts and software transactions. The ASU is effective beginning January 1, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, that reduces the types of transactions that fall within the current scope of software revenue recognition guidance. Existing software revenue recognition guidance requires that its provisions be applied to an entire arrangement when the sale of any products or services containing or utilizing software when the software is considered more than incidental to the product or service. As a result of the amendments included in ASU No. 2009-14, many tangible products and services that rely on software will be accounted for under the multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance rather than under the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the ASU, the following components would be excluded from the scope of software revenue recognition guidance: the tangible element of the product, software products bundled with tangible products where the software components and non-software components function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, and undelivered components that relate to software that is essential to the tangible product’s functionality. The ASU also provides guidance on how to allocate transaction consideration when an arrangement contains both deliverables within the scope of software revenue guidance (software deliverables) and deliverables not within the scope of that guidance (non-software deliverables). The ASU is effective beginning January 1, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended October 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

On May 20, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared our Form S-1 Registration Statement effective (File number 333-150192) permitting us to offer up to 240,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.000833 per share. There was no underwriter involved in our public offering.

On September 30, 2008, we sold a total of 120,720,000 shares of common stock and received cash proceeds of $100,600.

Since then we have spent the proceeds as follows:

Transfer Agent and Filing Fees	$	12,320
Professional Fees	$	43,992
Total Expenses	$	56,312

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

The following documents are included herein:

Exhibit No.	Document Description
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934~~, ~~this~~the registrant ~~report~~ has ~~been~~duly ~~signed~~caused ~~below~~this byreport ~~the~~to ~~following~~be ~~person~~signed on its behalf ofby the undersigned, ~~Registrant~~thereunto ~~and~~duly ~~in the capacities on this 28th day of May, 2010~~authorized.

HELI ELECTRONICS CORP. (Registrant) BY: LU LU Lu Lu President, Principal Executive Officer, Treasurer, Secretary, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and sole member of the Board of Directors

	HELI ELECTRONICS CORP.
	(Registrant)

	/s/ Xin Qiu
Date: August 13, 2010	Xin Qiu
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
	(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
	and Principal Accounting Officer)

1816

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Document Description
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Filing Compare · HELI ELECTRONICS CORP.