U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)


[X]	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Fiscal Year Ended: April 30, ~~2015~~2016


[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission file number: 000-54493

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada	80-0385523
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
Building B, #439, Jinyuan Ba Lu,
World Trade Center, 999 Canada Place, Suite 404, Vancouver, B.C. V6C 3E2
Jiangqiao Town, Jiading District,
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Shanghai, China		201812
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Postal Code)

~~Issuer's~~+1 ~~telephone number: 86~~604-~~181~~641-~~01819011~~1228

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer [ ]

Accelerated Filer [ ]

Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]

Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

As of October 31, ~~2014~~2015, there were 3349,~~438~~594,~~333~~832 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding. Of these, 1920,~~725~~425,~~000~~552 shares were held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $71,~~890~~531,~~000,~~916 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the OTC Markets on that date. As of November 25, 2016, there were 63,928,163 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding.

As of April 30, 2015, there were 34,791,666 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

If the following documents are incorporated by reference, briefly describe them and identify the part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) any annual report to security holders; (2) any proxy or information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”).

Not Applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item Number and Caption

Page

Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Item 1 Description Of Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

Mine Safety Disclosures

Part II

Item 5.

Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

1011

Item 8 Financial S tatements And Supplementary Data

Item 9.

Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure

3334

Item 9B.

Other Information

3335

Part III

3436

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, And Corporate Governance

3436

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

3739

Item 12.

Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management And Related
Stockholder Matters

3840

Item 13.

Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director Independence

3941

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees And Services

4043

Part IV

4244

Item 15.

Exhibits And Financial Statement Schedules

4244

Signatures

4345

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

All references in this Report to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” are to DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. and its 100% owned subsidiary DTS8 Holdings Co. Ltd. (“DTS8 Holdings”), which owns 100% of DTS8 Coffee (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“DTS8 Coffee”) which owns 100% of DTS8 Coffee (Huzhou) Co., Ltd. (“DTS8 Huzhou”).

This Report contains “forward-looking statements” that involve risk and uncertainties. We use forward-looking statements that you can identify by words or terminology such as "may", "should", "could", "predict", "potential", "continue", "expect", "anticipate", "future", "intend", "plan", "believe", "estimate" and similar expressions (or the negative of these expressions). Except for historical information, this Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and statements regarding our expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report, including, without limitation, statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, and future product demand, supply, costs, marketing, transportation and pricing factors, are forward-looking statements. Actual results, levels of activity, performance, achievements and events may vary materially from those implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions. Any such statements should be considered in light of various risks and uncertainties that could cause results to differ materially from expectations, estimates or forecasts expressed. The various risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: changes in general economic conditions; changes in business conditions in the coffee industry; fluctuations in consumer demand for coffee products; the availability and costs of green beans; increased competition within the green bean and roasted coffee businesses; our lack of successful operating history; our history of continued losses; our inability to successfully implement our business plan; fluctuations in the price of green coffee; concentration of single product and sales; lack of significant experience in the coffee industry of our employees; inability to hire, train and retain qualified personnel; inability to acquire customers; natural disasters, adverse weather conditions, diseases, political and social instability in countries where we source for green coffee beans; weak consumer demand for our roasted coffee; and the fact that we own only one roasting plant and interruption to our only roasting plant may cause significant disruption to our roasting operation. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date of this Report. Readers should carefully review this Report in its entirety, including but not limited to our financial statements and the notes thereto. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events.

ITEM 1

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Business Development

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 27, 2009. Effective January 22, 2013, we changed our name from Berkeley Coffee & Tea, Inc. to DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. Our articles of incorporation authorized the issuance of 75,000,000 shares of common stock each at a par value of $0.001. As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, 3452,~~791~~336,~~666~~499 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.

On April 30, 2012, we acquired one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding capital stock of DTS8 Holdings, a corporation organized and existing, since June 2008, under the laws of Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China, and which owns DTS8 Coffee, a wholly owned foreign subsidiary entity (“WOFE”) organized and existing in Shanghai under the laws of the People’s Republic of China. In March 2013, we completed the incorporation and licensing of DTS8 Huzhou, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of DTS8 Coffee Company Limited.

In October 2012, we obtained an exclusive license from Coffee Holdings Company, Inc. to roast, market and sell Don Manuel brand 100% Colombian Coffee in the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Philippines, Myanmar, Indonesia, East Timor, Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei. We pay a license fee for all coffee sold under the Don Manuel brand. The license is valid for five (5) years and will expire November 1, 2017. Don Manuel brand 100% Colombian coffee beans are grown at higher elevations and are artisan

Brunei. We pay a license fee for all coffee sold under the Don Manuel brand. The license is valid for five (5) years and will expire November 1, 2017. Don Manuel brand 100% Colombian coffee beans are grown at higher elevations and are artisan roasted to give a rich smooth-bodied coffee with sweet-toned syrupy notes and chocolate. The coffee has a balanced acidity and a smooth, clean finish.

We are a gourmet coffee roasting, marketing and wholesale distribution company. Our office and coffee storage facility is located in Shanghai, China. Our coffee roasting facility is located in Nanxun Town, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. We market and sell gourmet roasted coffee to our customers in Shanghai, and other parts of China. We sell gourmet roasted coffee under the DTS8 Coffee, Don Manuel and private label brands through distribution channels that reach consumers at restaurants, multi-location coffee shops and offices.

We have never declared bankruptcy or been in receivership.

How to Communicate with Us

Our principal executive office is located at ~~Building~~World B,Trade ~~#439~~Center, ~~Jinyuan~~999 BaCanada LuPlace, ~~Jiangqiao~~Suite ~~Town~~404, ~~Jiading District~~Vancouver, ~~Shanghai,~~B.C. ~~201812,~~V6C ~~China~~3E2, Canada and ~~our~~the telephone number is 1 (604) 641-1228. Our registered office is located at ~~Suite~~2448 ~~H, 2248~~ Meridian Blvd., Suite H, Minden, ~~Nevada~~NV, USA, 89423~~. Our~~ and that telephone number is (775-) 360-3031. orOur sales office is located at 1329 Xikang Road, #110, Putuo District, Shanghai 200060, China and the telephone number is 011-86-18101819011. ~~and~~Our electronic mail address is ~~sean@dts8coffee.com or~~ info@dts8coffee.com.

Our Business

Our core business revenue is derived from our coffee wholesale operations in China. DTS8 Holdings, through its subsidiaries, DTS8 Coffee (Shanghai) Co. Ltd and DTS8 Coffee (Huzhou) Co. Ltd, is in the business of roasting, marketing and selling gourmet roasted coffee to customers in Shanghai and other parts of China. We source coffee beans from around the world. We sell several varieties of gourmet roasted coffee under the “DTS8 Coffee” label through distribution channels such as multi-location coffee shops, restaurants and offices in China. As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, approximately 90% of our revenue was derived from one customer. However, we anticipate that our reliance on one customer will decline in the future as we obtain new customers and increase our revenue.

The Don Manuel brand is widely distributed and sold in the United States, and its addition to our portfolio complements our DTS8 Coffee brand which is roasted, marketed and sold to customers in Shanghai and other parts of China. The combination of the Don Manuel and DTS8 Coffee brands allows for growth opportunities into select channels of distribution in China and different geographic territories and creates potential opportunities for the growth of our business.

We expect that our continuing and expanding revenue growth will come from bulk roasted coffee sales in China which offers opportunities to develop the DTS8 Coffee brand and to penetrate and capture new market segments. More specifically, our objectives are to align our coffee roasting strengths and product innovation capabilities to offer a distinctive “DTS8 Coffee” brand experience. Our expansion strategy will allow us to grow in a controlled manner by developing our own DTS8 Coffee brand and by enhancing our brand's image and reputation for quality across China. The combination of our brand, differentiated roasted coffee positioning based on superior quality, and our strategic expansion into select distribution channels in different geographic territories creates potential opportunities for growth. We believe that our commitment to quality will establish a high degree of repeat business and customer loyalty.

Principal Products

We believe that our products provide flavor and characteristics suited for Chinese consumers. We choose our raw coffee beans for their richness in aroma and flavor from coffee producers throughout the world. Our coffee beans are grown by farmers in Colombia, Brazil, Indonesia, Kenya, Guatemala, Papua New Guinea and Ethiopia. Our coffees are available for sale in standard sizes of 250g, 500g, and 1kg. In addition to our current three signature blends, we also sell Don Manuel and other blends under in-house labels. We market our coffees in two main categories: gourmet whole bean and private label whole bean. We also roast and market specific blends of roasted coffees on a private label basis. These private ~~labels~~label productions are based on individual arrangements with each customer.

Manufacturing

As of the date of this Report, we own and operate a coffee roasting factory in Nanxun Town, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China. We use a Probat coffee roasting machine~~. We~~ ~~use~~along with a profile roasting system to accurately program the coffee roasting curve by modifying heat levels that are applied at various intervals. It enables the coffee’s degree of acidity or bitterness to be accurately controlled, and several taste profiles can also be created from the same green coffee blend. We use packaging bags made with a “Freshness Valve” to allow for a one-way flow of air to ensure that the coffee maintains freshness and remains fresh for a longer period of time.

Coffee Bean Suppliers

Coffee is an agricultural crop that undergoes price fluctuations and quality differences depending on the weather and economic and political conditions in coffee-producing countries. We purchase coffee from coffee brokers who supply us with quality green bean coffees from different countries. We depend upon outside trading companies and exporters for their supply of coffee. WeIn ~~need~~order to maintain our coffee blends, ~~and~~we require a continuous supply of similar ~~coffee in the future~~coffees. Accordingly, we routinely negotiate with the exporters or trading companies to purchase coffee tied to the specific New York “C” futures coffee contract market prices for future deliveries of coffee. The New York “C” futures coffee contract trades on the New York Coffee, Sugar & Cocoa Exchange. The quality of the coffee is determined by testing the grades of coffee and by cup tasting for flavor. We do not depend on any one broker/exporter to supply all of our coffee because a disruption in the supply from one broker/exporter may not be able to be remedied quickly ~~and~~or cost effectively.

Potential Customers in China of Roasted Coffee

The Chinese coffee market is characterized by a gradual shift in demand towards gourmet whole bean and ground coffee products away from instant coffee. The trend towards discovering richer coffee taste can be seen in the current proliferation of coffee café’s across China. The demand for better-quality and richer-tasting coffee is also increasing at home, work and restaurants. China ~~has~~continues ~~experienced~~to experience 15% to 20% annual growth in the consumption of coffee. Led initially by Starbucks, consumers in China are learning to drink and appreciate coffee beverages. As a result, more gourmet coffee cafe chain stores are opening all over China. We offer consumers in China several varieties of gourmet coffees. Our DTS8 Coffee is sold in coffee shops, restaurants and offices in China. We sell high quality gourmet coffee to individual coffee shops which ~~are~~is roasted in small batches on a private label basis.

Pricing and Competition

Our DTS8 Coffee brand of gourmet roasted coffees competes directly against other local and imported coffees sold at coffee retailers, discount stores and a growing number of coffee stores. Many coffee companies, like Starbucks, Costa, Illy, Coffee Beanery and Tea, and Gloria Jean, are operating retail outlets and sell whole bean coffees through these channels. The gourmet specialty market is highly competitive and contains competitors with substantially greater financial, marketing and operating resources than we have. We are targeting the growing segment of coffee drinkers by offering these consumers the opportunity of drinking quality gourmet coffee.

We also compete directly against all other coffee brands in the Chinese marketplace. We face competition from a number of large multi-national consumer product companies like Nestle Inc., as well as local coffee bean companies. Competition in the coffee market is becoming increasingly intense as relatively low barriers to entry encourage new competitors to enter the market. We believe that our customers choose based upon the quality and variety of the coffee. We believe consumers differentiate coffee brands based on freshness as an element of coffee quality. To our knowledge, few significant competitors focus on custom roasting and product freshness in the same manner as we do.

Government Regulations

As of the date of this Report, our management is unaware of any other federal or state laws and regulations in the United States that would apply to our operations and coffee business. We have a Nevada State Business License that expires on March 31, ~~2016~~2017.

In Shanghai and Huzhou, Zhejiang, China, our coffee roasting operations are subject to various governmental laws, regulations and licenses. These governmental authorities include federal, state and local, health, sanitation, and other departments that have jurisdiction over our operations. We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all such laws and regulations and have obtained all material licenses that are required for the operation of our business, including but not limited to the following: Business License, Tax Registration Certificate, National Industrial Products Production License, The People’s Republic of China Consignees and Consignors of Import and Export Goods Customs Declaration Registration Certificate, Certificate of Approval for Establishment of Enterprises with Investment, Financial Registration for Enterprises with Foreign Investment Registration and State Administration of Foreign Exchange License. We are not aware of any environmental regulations that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Customer Service

Our coffees are roasted and packaged in our coffee roasting factory and meet the regulatory requirements for food sanitation and safety in China. We guarantee our coffee quality and allow our customers to exchange any coffee considered unsatisfactory to them.

We own our website, www.dts8coffee.com, which is designed for easy navigation and to provide information on our company and coffee in general.

Employees

As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, we had six (6) full time and ~~seven~~four (74) part-time employees.

Research and Development Activities

We have not incurred any coffee-related research and development expenses and do not plan to incur any research or development expenses in the future.

Subsidiaries

We own 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of DTS8 Holdings Co., Ltd., a corporation organized and existing, since June 2008, under the laws of Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China, and which owns 100% of DTS8 Coffee (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. a WOFE organized and existing in Shanghai under the laws of the People’s Republic of China since January 19, 2009. DTS8 Coffee (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. owns 100% of DTS8 Coffee (Huzhou) Co., Ltd. in Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, the incorporation and licensing of which were completed in March 2013. Huzhou is approximately a two hour drive from Shanghai.

Patents and Trademarks

We do not own, either legally or beneficially, any patent or trademark.

Reports to Security Holders

We are filing this Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and will file reports, including quarterly and annual reports, with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the Exchange Act. These reports and any other materials filed with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We file our reports electronically with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that

~~be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We file our reports electronically with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that~~ contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS

Not applicable.

ITEM 1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2

PROPERTIES

Our ~~registered~~sales office is located at Suite H110, ~~2248~~1379 ~~Meridian~~Xikang ~~Blvd~~Road, ~~Minden~~Putuo District, ~~Nevada~~Shanghai ~~89423~~200060, China. ~~Our~~Lease ~~corporate~~commenced ~~office~~on ~~and~~January ~~coffee storage facility is located at Building B~~16, ~~#439~~2016, ~~Jinyuan~~and Baexpires ~~Lu,~~on ~~Jiangqiao~~January ~~Town~~31, ~~Jiading~~2017. ~~District,~~The ~~Shanghai~~lease ~~201812,~~area ~~China. There~~is ~~are~~ approximately 9221.08 square meters (~~990~~227 square feet) ~~of warehouse space devoted to coffee storage, general corporate use, coffee sales and customer services~~. ~~Our current lease expires on September 30, 2017.~~

~~Our~~A ~~coffee~~corporate ~~roasting~~office and ~~manufacturing~~coffee storage facility is located at ~~2nd~~Building ~~Floor~~B, ~~801~~#439, ~~Jiahe~~Jinyuan ~~Road~~Ba Lu, ~~Nanxun~~Jiangqiao Town, ~~Huzhou~~Jiading ~~City~~District, ~~313009,~~Shanghai ~~Zhejiang~~201812, China. There are approximately ~~1,041~~92 square meters (~~11,205~~990 square feet) of warehouse space ~~for~~devoted ~~manufacturing,~~to coffee storage, ~~and~~ general corporate use~~. The facility is equipped with a Probat coffee roaster~~, a coffee ~~cupping~~sales ~~lab with espresso machine, coffee grinders~~ and ~~coffee~~customer ~~brewers~~services. Our current lease expires on ~~August~~September 1730, ~~2015~~2017. We ~~have entered into negotiations with the landlord to renew the lease and do not anticipate encountering any difficulties in renewing the lease.~~

Our coffee roasting and manufacturing facility is located at 2nd Floor, 801 Jiahe Road, Nanxun Town, Huzhou City, 313009, Zhejiang, China. There are approximately 1,041 square meters (11,205 square feet) of warehouse space for manufacturing, storage and general corporate use. The facility is equipped with a Probat coffee roaster, a coffee cupping lab with espresso machine, coffee grinders and coffee brewers. Our current lease was extended for additional three and half years term and now expires on August 17, 2019.

We do not own any real property and do not have any investments or interests in any real estate.

ITEM 3

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As of the date of this Report, there is no litigation pending or threatened by or against us. However, from time to time we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. Such claims, even if not meritorious, would result in the expenditure by us of significant financial and managerial resources.

ITEM 4

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “BKCT”. Trading in our common stock on the OTCQB has been limited and sporadic and the quotations set forth below are not necessarily indicative of actual market conditions. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions. Our common stock became eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board on September 30, 2011, and became quoted on the OTCQB on January 15, 2013. Set forth below is the range of high and low bid information for each quarter within the last two fiscal years as provided by the OTC Markets website:

Quarter	High	Low
2016 Fourth Quarter	$0.18	$0.03
2016 Third Quarter	$0.25	$0.03
2016 Second Quarter	$0.16	$0.05
201 6 First Quarter	$0.12	$0.05
2015 Fourth Quarter	$0.25	$0.08
2015 Third Quarter	$0.40	$0.09
2015 Second Quarter	$0.59	$0.14
2015 First Quarter	$0.25	$0.09
2014 Fourth Quarter	$0.34	$0.07
2014 Third Quarter	$0.41	$0.17
2014 Second Quarter	$0.23	$0.08
2014 First Quarter	$0.33	$0.14

Holders

As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, we had approximately ~~121~~51 shareholders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends to our shareholders since our inception on March 27, 2009. Future payment of dividends is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other relevant factors. There are no material restrictions limiting, or that are likely to limit, our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock. We have no present intention to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

As of the date of this Report, we do not have a compensation plan under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

InOn ~~April~~October 20, 2015, wethe Company issued ~~800,000~~two ~~restricted~~convertible ~~shares~~promissory ofnotes ~~common~~with ~~stock~~same toterms in a ~~consultant~~total atamount of $210,000 with a ~~fair~~discount ~~market~~of ~~price~~5%. The proceeds of $0200,000 of the note were not received until October 23, 2015.~~085~~ ~~per~~The ~~share~~note asis ~~payment~~due ~~for~~together ~~consulting~~with ~~services~~any interest on April 19, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). ~~Total~~ ~~value~~The ofCompany has to pay interest on the ~~services,~~unpaid ~~valued~~principal balance of the note at the ~~fair~~rate ~~market~~of ~~price,~~10% ~~was~~per ~~$68~~annum from October 23,~~000. For~~ 2015 until the ~~year~~Maturity ~~ended~~Date. ~~April~~The 30outstanding principal and interest at 120% may be redeemed within 90 days of closing and 130% after 90 days. The conversion price shall equal, ~~2015~~subject to equitable adjustments for stock splits, ~~$68~~stock dividends or rights offerings by the Company,~~000~~ ~~was~~61% ~~expensed~~of asthe ~~consulting~~lowest ~~fees.~~daily ~~The~~volume ~~shares~~weighted ~~were~~average ~~issued~~price ~~with~~(“VWAP”) aof ~~restrictive~~the ~~legend~~common ~~and~~stock during the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. The note was issued in reliance on an exemption from the registration ~~under~~requirements ~~Section~~of ~~4(2)~~Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act. The cash proceeds were used for general working capital. In April 2016, the Company issued and 1,041,667 restricted shares of ~~1933~~common stocks of the Company for the conversion of $25,000 asof ~~amended~~the (Note II described in Note 14 of the ~~“Securities~~financial ~~Act”)~~statement.

On March 10, 2015, we issued a convertible note to an accredited investor in the amount of $54,000. The note, together with any interest payable thereon, matures on December 10, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”). We are required to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance of the note at the rate of 8% per annum from March 10, 2015 until the Maturity Date. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid on the Maturity Date shall bear an interest at the rate of 22% per annum from the due date until the note is paid in full. The holder of the note shall have the right from time to time, and at any time during the period beginning on the date

~~which~~In isMarch ~~180~~2016, ~~days following~~ the ~~date~~Company ofissued ~~the~~500,000 ~~note~~share ~~and ending on the later~~ of: ~~(i)~~common ~~the~~stock ~~Maturity~~to ~~Date~~a ~~and~~consultant ~~(ii)~~at ~~the~~fair ~~date~~market ofprice ~~payment~~ of ~~the~~$0.145 ~~note,~~per ~~each~~share inas ~~respect~~for ofconsulting ~~the~~fees. ~~remaining~~Total ~~outstanding~~value ~~principal amount~~ of the ~~note~~services, tovalued ~~convert~~at ~~all or any part of~~ the ~~outstanding~~fair ~~and~~market ~~unpaid~~price, ~~principal~~was ~~and~~$72,500. ~~interest~~For ~~amount of~~ the ~~note~~year ~~into~~ended ~~fully~~April ~~paid~~30, ~~and~~2016, ~~non-assessable~~$72,500 ~~shares~~was ofexpensed ~~our~~as ~~common~~consulting ~~stock~~fees. The ~~conversion~~shares ~~price~~were ~~shall~~issued ~~equal,~~with ~~subject~~a torestrictive ~~equitable adjustments for stock splits~~legend, ~~stock~~and ~~dividends~~the orshares ~~rights~~are ~~offerings,~~exempt ~~61%~~from ~~multiplied~~registration byas ~~the~~contained ~~market~~in ~~price~~Section of4(2) ~~the average~~ of the ~~lowest~~Securities ~~three~~Act ~~trading~~based ~~prices~~upon ~~for our common stock during~~ the 10fact ~~trading~~that ~~days prior to~~ the ~~conversion~~shares ~~date. The~~were ~~note was~~ issued in ~~reliance~~a onprivate antransaction ~~exemption~~to ~~from~~a ~~the~~consultant ~~registration requirements~~ of ~~Rule 506 of Regulation D under~~ the ~~Securities Act~~Company.

In April 2016, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock to the former chairman of the Company at fair market price of $0.042 per share as consulting fees. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price, was $50,400. For the year ended April 30, 2016, $50,400 was expensed as consulting fee. The shares were issued with a restrictive legend, and the shares are exempt from registration as contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act based upon the fact that the shares were issued in a private transaction to a director of the Company.

Stock Repurchase

As of the date of this Report, we do not have any stock repurchase plan.

ITEM 6

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

For the year ended April 30, 2015, our revenue from fresh roasted coffee grew by 19%, which is consistent with growth in revenue we experienced for the year ended April 30, 2014. Chinese consumers now choose coffee more by its original country and flavor instead of the coffee brand which is similar to the trend of coffee consumption habits in Western countries. In China, the improving coffee culture and the popularity of coffee shops in bigger cities is increasing the awareness and ~~sale~~sales of fresh roasted coffee. As a roaster of gourmet coffee from several coffee producing countries, we are well positioned in ~~Shanghai~~, ~~China,~~ with our roasting facility in Huzhou to participate in the development and evolution of ~~the~~this new coffee drinking culture in China. Fresh roasted coffee is ~~only~~ available only at a limited number of premium food service establishments and hotels. The opening of new coffee cafes and fast food restaurants has increased coffee sales in China, due to the adoption of a more modern, ~~lifestyles~~western influenced lifestyle, and affluence within the country. The evolution in the taste and buying habits of Chinese consumers is creating the development of a robust coffee market.

~~During~~For the year, weended ~~opened~~April a30, ~~sales~~2016, ~~office~~our inrevenue ~~Shanghai~~from tofresh ~~assist~~roasted ~~with~~coffee ~~our~~declined ~~increased~~by ~~marketing initiatives~~14. We5%. ~~participated~~This ~~with~~decrease ~~the~~in ~~Canadian~~revenue ~~Chamber~~is ofdue ~~Commerce~~to ofreduced ~~Shanghai~~wholesale sales to ~~celebrate~~our ~~Canada~~customers ~~Day~~during inthe ~~Shanghai~~year. onWe ~~June~~derive ~~27,~~about ~~2015,~~90% asof anrevenue ~~“in-kind”~~from ~~sponsor~~one customer. We ~~plan~~To toreduce ~~begin~~the ~~roasting~~reliance ~~and~~on ~~selling~~one ~~fair~~customer; ~~trade~~we ~~and~~have ~~organic~~initiated ~~certified~~marketing ~~coffees~~efforts ~~in order~~ to ~~take~~attract ~~advantage~~new ofcustomers ~~the growing markets~~ for ~~those~~our ~~products~~roasted incoffee ~~Shanghai~~products. ~~These~~ ~~coffees~~Chinese ~~are~~consumers ~~produced~~now bychoose ~~farmers~~coffee ~~who~~more ~~cultivate~~by ~~less~~its ~~than~~original 3country ~~hectare farms~~ and ~~harvest~~flavor ~~1,000-3,000~~instead ~~pounds~~ of the coffee ~~per~~brand ~~year. During~~which ~~the~~is ~~year,~~similar weto ~~also~~the ~~continued~~trend ~~our~~of ~~strategy~~coffee toconsumption ~~market~~habits ~~the~~in ~~DTS8~~Western ~~Coffee~~countries. ~~brand~~On asMarch ~~fresh~~1, ~~roasted~~2016 ~~premium~~we ~~gourmet~~executed ~~coffee~~a todefinitive ~~customers~~agreement into ~~China. In~~acquire ~~China,~~one ~~the~~hundred ~~country~~percent (100%) of ~~origin~~the ofissued ~~coffee~~and ~~beans~~outstanding isshares ~~receiving~~of ~~increased~~a ~~attention~~private, ~~from~~U.S. coffee ~~drinkers~~roasting company. ~~This~~The ~~bodes~~purchase ~~well~~price for ~~our~~the ~~Don~~acquisition ~~Manuel~~was ~~brand~~$4,500,000 ~~100%~~in ~~Colombian~~cash ~~and~~at ~~other~~closing, ~~premium~~or, ~~roasted~~if ~~gourmet~~the ~~coffee.~~total Weamount ~~are~~is ~~committed~~not topaid ~~high~~in ~~quality~~cash, ~~standards~~$4,700,000 ~~the~~in ~~importance~~cash ~~of origin~~ and ~~respect~~debt ~~for~~at ~~coffee farmers~~closing. ~~Our~~ ~~marketing~~As ~~efforts,~~of ~~combined with~~ the ~~growth~~date of ~~gourmet~~this ~~coffee shop chains in Shanghai~~Report, ~~China,~~the ~~are~~agreement ~~expected~~has toexpired ~~increase~~and the ~~sales~~acquisition ofhas ~~our~~not ~~fresh~~been ~~roasted coffee~~completed. ~~The~~ ~~combination~~On ofMarch ~~the~~30, ~~Don~~2016, ~~Manuel~~we ~~and~~announced that DTS8 Coffee ~~brands~~was ~~allows~~approved for ~~additional~~listing ~~growth~~in ~~opportunities~~the of'Mergent ~~our~~Manuals' ~~business~~and ~~into~~news ~~select~~reports ~~channels~~allowing the trading of ~~distribution~~DTS8 Coffee securities in ~~China~~secondary ~~and~~markets ~~other~~while ~~geographic~~delivering ~~territories~~maximum corporate visibility to the investment community.

ToDuring ~~date~~the year, ~~our~~we ~~core~~moved ~~business~~the ~~revenue~~sales ~~has~~office ~~been~~in ~~derived~~Shanghai ~~from~~to ~~direct~~assist ~~coffee~~with ~~wholesale~~increased inmarketing ~~China. We~~initiatives ~~expect~~and ~~our~~we ~~growth~~again toparticipated ~~result~~with ~~from~~ the ~~sale~~Canadian Chamber of ~~bulk~~Commerce ~~roasted~~of ~~gourmet~~Shanghai ~~coffee, which offers opportunities~~ to ~~develop~~celebrate ~~the~~Canada ~~DTS8~~Day ~~Coffee~~in ~~brand~~Shanghai ~~and~~as toan ~~penetrate~~“in-kind” ~~and capture new market segments~~sponsor. Our ~~market~~marketing ~~penetration~~efforts, ~~strategies~~combined ~~are:~~with ~~(a) consistently selling only~~ the ~~highest~~growth ~~quality~~of ~~roasted~~gourmet ~~Arabica~~ coffee; ~~(b)~~shop ~~providing~~chains ain ~~superior and consistent level of customer service; and (c) strategic expansion into select channels of distribution including hotels~~Shanghai, ~~restaurants~~China, ~~specialty~~are ~~grocery~~expected ~~and~~to ~~gourmet~~increase ~~food~~the ~~stores,~~sales ~~chain~~of ~~supermarkets~~our ~~and~~fresh ~~convenience~~roasted ~~stores, and food and beverage caterers~~coffee. ~~Our~~The ~~expansion~~combination ~~strategy~~of ~~will~~the ~~allow~~Don usManuel toand ~~grow~~DTS8 inCoffee abrands ~~controlled~~allows ~~manner~~for byadditional ~~developing~~growth ~~our~~opportunities ~~own~~of ~~DTS8~~our ~~Coffee~~business ~~brand~~into ~~and~~select bychannels ~~enhancing~~of ~~the~~distribution ~~brand’s~~in ~~image~~China and ~~quality~~other ~~reputation.~~geographic ~~The combination of our brand,~~ territories.

10Review of Operations for the Years Ended April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015

differentiated roasted coffee positioning based on superior quality, and our strategic expansion into select distribution channels in different geographic territories creates potential opportunities for growth. We also believe that our commitment to quality will establish a high degree of repeat business and customer loyalty.

Review of Operations for the Years Ended April 30, 2015 and April 30, 2014

Results of Operations

Revenue for the year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 ~~was~~and ~~$368~~2015,~~977~~ ~~compared~~were to $~~310~~315,~~003~~302 ~~for~~and ~~the year ended April 30~~$368, ~~2014~~977. The ~~increase~~decline in revenue of ~~approximately~~$53,675 19(14.5%) iswas ~~attributable~~due to a general ~~increase~~decrease in sales volume throughout the year to our existing ~~and new wholesale~~ customers. Cost of sales were $~~241~~213,~~316~~710 and $~~184~~241,~~225~~316, respectively, and our gross margins for the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, were $~~127~~101,~~661~~592 (3532.2% of sales) and $~~125~~127,~~778~~661 (41(34.6% of sales). The gross margin decline ~~for~~in ~~the~~2016 ~~2015~~ year was due to the ~~increased~~decreased ~~cost of~~ sales ~~resulting from higher raw coffee prices~~ during the year and andecreased ~~increase~~cost inof ~~occupancy~~sales ~~costs~~ due to ~~the~~lower ~~higher~~level ~~lease~~of ~~cost~~inventory ofon ~~our~~hand ~~roasting~~and ~~factory~~lower raw coffee prices. In ~~2014~~2015, the gross margin was higher resulting from lower cost of sales due to lower raw coffee prices.

Our general and administrative expenses were $~~828~~1,~~430~~203,783 and $1828,~~030,962~~430 during the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015. Our expenses for the year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 ~~were~~increased ~~lower~~ as we ~~issued~~expensed ~~shares~~$743,400 atin aprofessional ~~fair~~fees ~~market~~and ~~value~~management offees ~~$339~~in 2016,~~000~~ ~~for~~being ~~consulting~~the ~~services~~fair ~~compared~~market toprice ~~shares~~for ~~issued~~the atissuance ~~fair market value~~ of ~~$591~~9,~~400~~500,000 ~~for~~shares ~~consulting~~of ~~services~~common ~~during~~stock, ~~the~~whereas ~~prior~~in ~~year. In~~ 2015, we expensed $339,000 in ~~consulting~~professional fees and management fees, being the fair market price for the issuance of 2,220,000 shares of common stock. For the years ended April 30, ~~whereas~~2016 inand ~~2014~~2015, we ~~expensed~~incurred ~~$495,400~~convertible innote ~~consulting~~payable ~~fees~~interest ~~and~~expenses of $96277,~~000~~110 inand ~~legal fees~~$651, ~~being~~respectively. On the ~~fair~~convertible ~~market~~notes ~~price~~payable ~~for the issuance~~ of 2$258,~~185,~~000 ~~shares~~we ofrecorded ~~common~~a ~~stock. A~~derivative ~~goodwill~~liability ~~impairment~~expense ~~adjustment~~ of $3171,~~010,758~~804 ~~was~~and ~~also~~other ~~expensed~~expenses ~~during~~of $19,500. For the year ended April 30, 2015, a goodwill impairment adjustment of $3,010,758 was expensed as we concluded that such a charge was reasonable following the occurrence of events indicating that ~~some~~ goodwill had been impaired. Our ~~goodwill~~marketing ~~impairment~~expenses ~~adjustment~~were $30,490 and $26,498 during the ~~year~~years ended April 30, ~~2014~~2016 ~~was~~and 2015. In 2015, we disposed of fixed assets and realized a gain on disposal of $1,~~391,979~~015. During the year ended April 30, 2015, we terminated our 19% equity interest in a joint venture company, Don

Our marketing expenses were $26,498 and $28,565 during the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014. During the year ended April 30, 2015, we disposed of fixed assets and incurred a loss of $1,015. In 2014, we disposed of a vehicle and realized a gain on disposal of $17,566.

During the year ended April 30, 2015, we terminated our 19% equity interest in a joint venture company, Don Manuel (Shanghai) Investment Management Co. Ltd., incorporated to own, manage and operate Café De La Don Manuel branded coffee cafes throughout China. The $55,000 we paid for the initial investment was written off as loss on investment. In 2015, we incurred convertible note payable interest expenses of $651. Our losses for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 were $3,794,691 and $2,308,163, respectively, and our currency translation adjustments resulted in losses of $1,113 and $2,534, respectively. Consequently, our comprehensive losses for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 were $3,795,804 and $2,310,697. Our net loss per share for those years was $0.12 per share on weighted average with 32,973,473 basic and diluted shares for the most recent year, compared to a loss of $0.09 per share on weighted average with 26,825,155 basic and diluted shares for the prior year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Provided below is selected financial data about us for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014. Our financial statements and notes thereto are included in this Report under “Financial Statements”.

		April 30, 2015		April 30, 2014
Cash	$	85,665	$	33,339
Total assets	$	286,277	$	3,231,147
Total liabilities	$	1,067,286	$	834,852
Stockholders’ equity deficit	$	781,009	$	2,396,295

~~$3,010,758,~~Manuel ~~and~~(Shanghai) ~~the~~Investment ~~net~~Management ~~value~~Co. ~~of our machinery~~Ltd., ~~plant~~incorporated ~~and~~to ~~equipment was $54~~own,~~907. Our~~ ~~paid~~manage ~~in capital was $7,057,409~~ and ~~shareholders’~~operate ~~equity~~Café ~~deficit~~De ~~was~~La ~~$781,009.~~Don ~~Since~~Manuel ~~our~~branded ~~inception~~coffee oncafes ~~March~~throughout ~~27,~~China. ~~2009,~~The ~~we have incurred accumulated losses of~~ $755,~~867,478~~000 ~~and~~we ~~our~~paid ~~other~~for ~~comprehensive~~the ~~loss~~initial ~~from~~investment ~~currency translations~~ was ~~$5,731~~written off as ofloss ~~April~~on ~~30, 2015~~investment.

AsOur oflosses for the years ended April 30, ~~2014,~~2016 weand ~~had~~2015 were $331,~~339 in cash~~607,980 ~~receivables~~and of $693,~~526~~794,691, ~~inventory~~respectively, and our currency translation adjustments resulted in a gain of $3613,~~647~~419 and ~~prepaid~~a ~~expenses~~loss of $81,~~459~~113, ~~while~~respectively. Consequently, our ~~accounts~~comprehensive ~~payable~~losses ~~and~~for ~~accruals~~the ~~were~~years ~~$104,460~~ended ~~and~~April ~~loans~~30, ~~from~~2016 ~~related~~and ~~parties~~2015 were ~~$730~~1,~~460.~~594,561 ~~Goodwill~~and ~~net of impairment was~~ $3,~~010~~795,~~758~~804. For ~~and~~ the ~~net~~year ~~value~~ended ofApril ~~our~~30, ~~machinery~~2016, ~~plant~~our ~~and~~net ~~equipment~~loss ~~was~~per ~~$72,418. Our~~share ~~paid~~for ~~in capital~~ was $~~6,442,992~~0.04 ~~and~~per ~~shareholders’~~share ~~equity~~on ~~was $2~~45,~~396~~413,~~295. Since~~158 ~~our~~weighted ~~inception~~average onbasic ~~March~~and ~~27,~~diluted ~~2009,~~shares wecompared ~~incurred~~to ~~accumulated~~a ~~losses~~loss of $~~4,072,787~~0.12 ~~and~~per ~~our~~share ~~other~~on ~~comprehensive~~32,973,473 ~~loss~~weighted ~~from~~average ~~currency~~basic ~~translations~~and ~~was~~diluted ~~$4,618~~shares asfor ofthe year ended April 30, ~~2014~~2015.

~~During~~Liquidity ~~the year ended April 30, 2015, we financed our operations by selling shares of common stock~~ and aCapital convertible note. Our ability to continue with our business is subject to our ability to continue generating additional revenue and obtaining equity financing to fund our working capital. To fund our ongoing operations, we may be forced to find alternate sources of financing, which at this time cannot be assured. Resources

Provided below is selected financial data about us for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015. Our financial statements and notes thereto are included in this Report under “Financial Statements”.


		April 30, 2016		April 30, 2015
Cash	$	28,866	$	85,665
Total assets	$	142,672	$	286,277
Total liabilities	$	1,263,484	$	1,067,286
Stockholders’ equity deficit	$	1,120,812	$	781,009

As of April 30, 2016, we had $28,866 in cash, receivables of $45,697, inventory of $11,496 and prepaid expenses of $9,761, while our accounts payable and accruals were $89,102, loans from related parties were $622,776 and we had convertible notes payable of $258,000. The net value of our machinery, plant and equipment was $46,852. Our paid in capital was $8,294,622 and shareholders’ equity deficit was $1,120,812. Since our inception on March 27, 2009, we have incurred accumulated losses of $9,475,458 and our other comprehensive income from currency translations was $7,688 as of April 30, 2016.

As of April 30, 2015, we had $85,665 in cash, receivables of $78,551, inventory of $58,150 and prepaid expenses of $9,004, while our accounts payable and accruals were $240,334, loans from related parties were $772,952 and we had a convertible note payable of $54,000. The net value of our machinery, plant and equipment was $54,907. Our paid in capital was $7,057,409 and shareholders’ equity deficit was $781,009. Since our inception on March 27, 2009, we have incurred accumulated losses of $7,867,478 and our other comprehensive loss from currency translations was $5,731 as of April 30, 2015.

During the year ended April 30, 2016, we financed our operations by selling shares of common stock in private transactions and borrowing under the convertible notes. Our ability to continue with our business is subject to our ability to continue generating additional revenue and obtaining additional equity financing to fund our working capital. To fund our ongoing operations, we may be forced to find alternate sources of financing, which at this time cannot be assured.

As of the date of this Report, we have not incurred any coffee related research and development expenses and do not plan to incur any research or development expenses in the future.

Going Concern

Our accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred material recurring losses from operations. As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, we had an accumulated deficit, limited cash and unprofitable operations. These factors, among others, indicate that we may be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is contingent upon our ability to obtain additional financing and to generate revenue and cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis. Any failure to generate revenue and profits will raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We plan to retain any cash we earn in order to develop our business.

financing and to generate revenue and cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis. Any failure to generate revenue and profits will raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We plan to retain any cash we earn in order to develop our business.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies & Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make a variety of estimates and assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and (2) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods covered by the financial statements. Our management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increase, these judgments become even more subjective and complex. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates and assumptions based upon actual results may have a material impact on our results of operation and/or financial condition. We have identified certain accounting policies that we believe are most important to the portrayal of our current financial condition and results of operations. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 4 to the financial statements included in this Report.

Revenue Recognition

We derive our revenue from sale of roasted coffees. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery occurs, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Coffees are considered delivered when title and risk have been transferred to the customer. Retail sales are recorded when payment is tendered at point of sale. Wholesale sales are recorded upon delivery of coffee to the customers.

assured. Coffees are considered delivered when title and risk have been transferred to the customer. Retail sales are recorded when payment is tendered at point of sale. Wholesale sales are recorded upon delivery of coffee to the customers.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line or accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful lives of property, plant and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are five to ten years for equipment. We evaluate the recoverability of property and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. We determine impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations.

Receivables

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the net realizable value and do not bear interest. No allowance for doubtful accounts was made during the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, based on management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable. We evaluate our allowance for doubtful accounts based upon knowledge of our customers and their compliance with credit terms. The evaluation process includes a review of customers' accounts on a regular basis. The review process evaluates all account balances with amounts outstanding 60 days and other specific amounts for which information obtained indicates that the balance may be uncollectible. As at April 30, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts. We do not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to our customers.

Goodwill

Upon the acquisition of DTS8 Holdings on April 30, 2012, we recognised $4,402,737 of goodwill. Goodwill is the excess of the acquisition cost of DTS8 Holdings on April 30, 2012, over the cost of net identifiable assets over the fair value of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment. The test is performed more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Impairment is tested by comparing fair value of the goodwill to its carrying value. Any excess of carrying value over fair value is charged to earnings in the period in which impairment is determined. The Financial Accounting Standard ASU 2011-08 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Testing Goodwill for Impairment” allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. We would not be required to calculate the fair value unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. There are a number of events and circumstances for us to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. Management completed this review by following the steps in ASC 350-20-35-3C to evaluate the fair value of the goodwill. As part of the review of the goodwill and on the understanding that examples included in ASC 350-20-35-3C are not exhaustive lists of items that should be considered, management considered all known events, and circumstances that could trigger an impairment of goodwill. Estimating fair value is performed by utilizing various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow. The impairment review is highly judgmental and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions have a significant impact on the amount of any impairment charge recorded. Discounted cash flow methods are dependent upon assumptions of future sales trends, market conditions and cash flows of each reporting unit over several years. Actual cash flows in the future may differ significantly from those previously forecasted. Other significant assumptions include growth rates and the discount rate applicable to future cash flows.

ITEM 8

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.

AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF APRIL 30, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 30, 2015 and April 30, 2014
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 30, 2016 and 2015
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015
	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd.

Shanghai, China

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders' ~~equity~~deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

~~July~~November 2925, ~~2015~~ 2016

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		April 30, 2015		April 30, 2014
		April 30, 2016		April 30, 2015
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	85$ 28,~~665~~866	$	33$ 85,~~339~~665
Accounts receivable		7845,~~551~~697		6978,~~526~~551
Prepaid expenses		9,~~004~~761		89,~~459~~004
Inventories		5811,~~150~~496		3658,~~647~~150
Total Current Assets		~~231~~95,~~370~~820		~~147~~231,~~971~~370
Property, plant and equipment, net		5446,~~907~~852		7254,~~418~~907
Goodwill, net		-		3,010,758
TOTAL ASSETS	$	$ 142,672	$	$ 286,277
TOTAL ASSETS	$	286,277	$	3,231,147
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accruals	$	~~240~~$ 89,~~334~~102	$	~~104~~$ 240,~~460~~334
Convertible note payable		54,000		-
Convertible notes payable, net		258,000		54,000
Due to related parties		772,952		730,466
Derivative liabilities		293,606	-	-
Total Current Liabilities		1,067,286		834,852
Due to related parties		622,776		772,952
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)
Total Current Liabilities		1,263,484		1,067,286
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,263,484		1,067,286
Common stock, 75,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value; 34,791,666 and 30,708,333 shares issued and outstanding as of April 30, 2015 and April 30, 2014, respectively		34,791		30,708
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Additional paid in capital		7,057,409		6,442,992
Common stock, 75,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value; 52,336,499 and 34,791,666 shares issued and outstanding as of April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively		52,336		34,791
Accumulated deficit		(7,867,478)		(4,072,787)
Additional paid in capital		8,294,622		7,057,409
Accumulated other comprehensive income		(5,731)		(4,618)
Accumulated deficit		(9,475,458)		(7,867,478)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		(781,009)		2,396,295
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		7,688		(5,731)
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	286,277	$	3,231,147
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT		(1,120,812)		(781,009)
TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	$ 142,672	$	$ 286,277

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

		Year Ended April 30, 2015		Year Ended April 30, 2014
		Year Ended April 30, 2016		Year Ended April 30, 2015
REVENUE
Sales	$	~~368~~$ 315,~~977~~302	$	~~310~~$ 368,~~003~~977
Cost of sales		~~241~~213,~~316~~710		~~184~~241,~~225~~316
Gross profit		~~127~~101,~~661~~592		~~125~~127,~~778~~661
OPERATING EXPENSES
Goodwill impairment		~~3,010,758~~-		13,~~391~~010,~~979~~758
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets		1,015		(17,566)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		47		1,015
Marketing expenses		2630,~~498~~490		2826,~~565~~498
General and administrative expenses		~~828~~1,~~430~~203,783		1828,~~030,962~~430
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		31,~~866~~234,~~701~~320		23,~~433~~866,~~941~~701
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(31,~~739~~132,~~040~~728)		(23,~~308~~739,~~163~~040)
Loss on investment in joint venture		~~55,000~~-		-55,000
Interest expense		~~651~~277,110		-651
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES		55,651		-
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		171,804		-
NET LOSS	$	(3,794,691)	$	(2,308,163)
Other expenses		26,338		-
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES		475,252		55,651
Foreign currency translation loss adjustments		(1,113)		(2,534)
NET LOSS	$	(1,607,980)	$	(3,794,691)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	(3,795,804)	$	(2,310,697)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME（LOSS）
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE	$	(0.12)	$	(0.09)
Foreign currency translation loss adjustments		13,419		(1,113)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED		32,973,473		26,825,155
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	$ (1,594,561)	$	$ (3,795,804)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE	$	$ (0.04)	$	$ (0.12)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED		45,413,158		32,973,473

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' ~~EQUITY (~~DEFICIT)

	Common Stock
	Number of Shares		~~Amount~~		~~Additional Paid-In Capital~~Amount		~~Accumulated~~Additional ~~Other~~Paid-In ~~Comprehensive Loss~~Capital		Accumulated ~~Deficit~~Other Comprehensive Loss		~~Total~~Accumulated ~~Stockholders' Equity (~~Deficit)		Total Stockholders' Deficit
Balance as of April 30, 2013	26,273,333	$	26,273	$	5,586,027	$	(2,084)	$	(1,764,624)	$	3,845,592
Balance as of April 30, 2014	30,708,333				$ 30,708		$ 6,442,992		$ (4,618)		$ (4,072,787)		$ 2,396,295
Stock issued for services at $0.20 per share	65,000		65		12,935						13,000
Stock issued for services at $0.16 per share	1,000,000				1,000		159,000						160,000
Stock issued for services at $0.32 per share	900,000		900		287,100						288,000
Stock issued for cash at $0.15 per share	1,863,333				1,863		277,637						279,500
Stock issued for services at $0.36 per share	600,000		600		215,400						216,000
Stock issued for services at $0.31 per share	300,000				300		92,700						93,000
Stock issued for services at $0.12 per share	620,000		620		73,780						74,400
Stock issued for services at $0.15 per share	120,000				120		17,880						18,000
Stock issued for cash at $0.12 per share	1,666,667		1,667		198,333						200,000
Stock issued for services at $0.085 per share	800,000				800		67,200						68.000
Stock issued for payment of debt at $0.12 per share	583,333		583		69,417						70,000
Foreign currency translation adjustment									(1,113)				(1,113)
Foreign currency translation adjustment							(2,534)				(2,534)
Net loss for the year ended April 30, 2015											(3,794,691)		(3,794,691)
Net loss for the year ended April 30, 2014									(2,308,163)		(2,308,163)
Balance as of April 30, 2015	34,791,666				34,791		7,057,409		(5,731)		(7,867,478)		(781,009)
Balance as of April 30, 2014	30,708,333		30,708		6,442,992		(4,618)		(4,072,787)		2,396,295
Shares issued for cash	2,500,000				2,500		47,500		-		-		50,000
Stock issued for services at $0.16 per share	1,000,000		1,000		159,000						160,000
Shares issued for services	9,500,000				9,500		733,900		-		-		743,400
Stock issued for cash at $0.15 per share	1,863,333		1,863		277,637						279,500
Share issued for the settlement of related party debt and payables	3,542,857				3,543		244,457		-		-		248,000
Stock issued for services at $0.31 per share	300,000		300		92,700						93,000
Conversion of convertible notes	2,001,976				2,002		79,158		-				81,160
Stock issued for services at $0.15 per share	120,000		120		17,880						18,000
Net loss for the year ended April 30, 2016	-				-		-		-		(1,607,980)		(1,607,980)
Stock issued for services at $0.085 per share	800,000		800		67,200						68.000
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-				-		-		13,419		-		13,419
Foreign currency translation adjustment							(1,113)				(1,113)
Reclassification of derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital	-				-		132,198		-		-		132,198
Net loss for the year ended April 30, 2015									(3,794,691)		(3,794,691)
Balance as of April 30, 2016	52,336,499			$	$ 52,336	$	$ 8,294,622	$	$ 7,688	$	$ (9,475,458)	$	$ (1,120,812)
Balance as of April 30, 2015	34,791,666	$	34,791	$	7,057,409	$	(5,731)	$	(7,867,478)	$	(781,009)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		Year Ended April 30, 2015		Year Ended April 30, 2014
		Year Ended April 30, 2016		Year Ended April 30, 2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	$ (31,~~794~~607,~~691~~980)	$	$ (23,~~308~~794,~~163~~691)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		1614,~~527~~872		2016,~~031~~527
Shares issued for services		339,000		591,400
Amortization of debt discount		264,000		-
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed asset		1,015		(17,566)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		171,804		-
Loss on investment in joint venture		55,000		-
Stock-based compensation		743,400		339,000
Goodwill impairment		3,010,758		1,391,979
Loss on disposal of fixed asset		47		1,015
Loss on investment in joint venture		-		55,000
Goodwill impairment		-		3,010,758
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(829,~~477)~~145		(158,~~724~~477)
Prepaid expenses		(~~481~~1,259)		(~~5,544~~481)
Inventories		~~(21~~44,~~128)~~290		(521,~~575~~128)
Due to related parties		50143,~~191~~668		-50,191
Accounts payable and accruals		~~134~~(140,~~474~~752)		~~114~~134,~~532~~474
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(~~217~~338,~~812~~765)		(~~234~~217,~~630~~812)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of property and equipment		(~~177~~9,997)		(~~693~~177)
Cash paid for investment in joint venture		~~(55,000)~~-		-(55,000)
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets		-117		~~18,936~~-
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(55,177)		18,243
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(9,880)		(55,177)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Shares issued for cash		~~279~~50,~~500~~000		~~200~~279,~~000~~500
Proceeds from convertible note		54273,000		-54,000
Loans from related parties		-		70,000
Proceeds from related parties		97,381		-
Repayments to related parties		(13122,~~170~~800)		(3713,~~409~~170)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		~~320~~297,~~330~~581		~~232~~320,~~591~~330
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		4(5,~~985~~735)		(24,~~456)~~985
NET INCREASE IN CASH		52,326		13,748
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(56,799)		52,326
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		3385,~~339~~665		1933,~~591~~339
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR	$	85$ 28,~~665~~866	$	33$ 85,~~339~~665
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash paid for interest and income taxes:
Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-
Interest paid	$	-	$	-
Non cash transaction:
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Common stock issued for payment of debt	$	-		70,000
Shares issued for conversion of notes and accrued interests		81,160		-
Shares issued for the settlement of related party debt and payables		248,000		-
Debt discount from derivative liabilities		254,000		-
Reclassification of derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital		132,198

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

APRIL 30, ~~2015~~2016 AND ~~2014~~2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 27, 2009. Effective January 22, 2013, the Company changed its name from Berkeley Coffee & Tea, Inc. to DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. On April 30, 2012, the Company acquired one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding capital stock of DTS8 Holdings Co., Ltd. (“DTS8 Holdings”), a corporation organized and existing since June 2008 under the laws of Hong Kong, and which owns DTS8 Coffee (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“DTS8 Coffee”), a wholly owned foreign subsidiary entity (“WOFE”) corporation organized and existing in Shanghai since January 19, 2009, under the laws of the People’s Republic of China.

In March 2013, the Company established a 100% owned subsidiary of DTS8 Coffee called DTS8 Coffee (Huzhou) Co. Ltd. (“DTS8 Huzhou”) in Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, which is approximately a two hour drive from Shanghai. DTS8 Huzhou is a coffee roaster equipped with the standard procedures to ensure that it meets regulatory requirements for food safety and sanitation in China.

DTS8 Holdings, through its subsidiaries DTS8 Coffee and DTS8 Huzhou, is a gourmet coffee roasting, marketing and wholesale distribution company. The Company’s office and coffee storage facility is located in Shanghai, China, and its coffee roasting facility is located in Nanxun Town, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. The Company is in the business of roasting, marketing and selling ~~gourmet~~artisan roasted coffee to customers in Shanghai and other parts of China. It sells ~~gourmet~~artisan roasted coffee under the “DTS8 Coffee” label and other labels through distribution channels that reach consumers at restaurants, multi-location coffee shops, and offices.

NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying audited ~~annual~~consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-K and Article 8 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In the opinion of management, the financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the results for the years presented.

The accompanying ~~audited~~ consolidated financial statements have been prepared to present the consolidated statements of financial position, the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ ~~equity (~~deficit) and consolidated cash flows of the Company for the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, for inclusion in the Company’s Form 10-K for purposes of complying with the rules and regulations of the SEC as required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X. The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) using Company specific information where available and allocations and estimates where data is not maintained on the Company specific basis within its books and records. Due to the allocations and estimates used to prepare the financial statements, they may not reflect the financial position, cash flows and results of operations of the Company in the future or its operations, cash flows and financial position.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues, goodwill impairment and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. This reclassification has resulted in no changes to the Company’s accumulated deficit or net loss presented.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTY

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of the business. The Company has incurred material losses from operations. At April 30, ~~2015~~2016, the Company had ana ~~accumulated~~working capital deficit of $1,167,664 in addition to limited cash, limited revenue and unprofitable operations. For the ~~years~~fiscal year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016, ~~and April 30, 2014,~~ the Company sustained net losses and generated negative cash flows from operations. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to obtain additional financing and to generate revenue and cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis.

liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to obtain additional financing and to generate revenue and cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis.

NOTE 4 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to US GAAP and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Basis of Preparation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared to present the consolidated statements of financial position, the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive ~~income (~~loss), consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ ~~equity~~deficit and consolidated cash flows of the Company for the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

Basis of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, DTS8 Holdings Co., Ltd., DTS8 Coffee (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, and DTS8 Coffee (Huzhou) Co. Ltd. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with US GAAP, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues, goodwill impairment and expenses during the reporting periods. Management makes these estimates using the best information available at the time the estimates are made. However, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held by major financial institutions located in the People’s Republic of China, which management believes are of high credit quality. With respect to accounts receivable, the Company extends credit based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition. The Company generally does not require collateral for accounts receivable and maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts of accounts receivable if necessary.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents comprise certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. As at April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash only.

Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at net realizable value and do not bear interest. No allowance for doubtful accounts was made during the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, based on management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable. The Company evaluates its allowance for doubtful accounts based upon knowledge of its customers and their compliance with credit terms. The evaluation process includes a review of customers’ accounts on a regular basis. The review process evaluates all account balances with amounts outstanding for more than 60 days and other specific amounts for which information obtained indicates that the balance may be uncollectible. As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost for inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out method. The cost includes all expenditures incurred in bringing the goods to the point of sale and putting them in a sellable condition. In assessing the ultimate realization of inventories, the management makes judgments as to future demand requirements compared to current or committed inventory levels. The Company estimates the demand requirements based on market conditions, forecasts prepared by its customers, sales contracts and orders in hand. In addition, the Company estimates net realizable value based on intended use, current market value and inventory aging analyses. The Company writes down inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventories and their estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventories principally consist of green coffee beans, roasted coffee beans and packing supplies.

current or committed inventory levels. The Company estimates the demand requirements based on market conditions, forecasts prepared by its customers, sales contracts and orders in hand. In addition, the Company estimates net realizable value based on intended use, current market value and inventory aging analyses. The Company writes down inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventories and their estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventories principally consist of green coffee beans, roasted coffee beans and packing supplies.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Cost represents the purchase price of the asset and other costs incurred to bring the asset into its existing use. Depreciation is provided on straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives as set out below. Major remodels and improvements are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are charged to expense as incurred. Upon sale or disposition, the applicable amounts of asset cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the net amount less proceeds from disposal is charged or credited to income.


	Useful life	Residue value
Machinery equipment	10 years	10%
Office equipment	5 years	10%
Production equipment	5 years	10%
Vehicles	4 years	10%
Leasehold Improvements	3 years	0%

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for impairment of property and equipment and amortizable intangible assets in accordance with ASC 360, “Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of”, which requires the Company to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability when there is event or circumstance that indicate the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable (when carrying amount exceeds the gross, undiscounted cash flows from use and disposition) and is measured as the excess of the carrying amount over the asset’s (or asset group’s) fair value. There was no impairment of long-lived assets for the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

Impairment of Goodwill

Upon the acquisition of DTS8 Holdings on April 30, 2012, the Company recognised $4,402,737 of goodwill. Goodwill is the excess of the acquisition cost of DTS8 Holdings on April 30, 2012, over the cost of net identifiable assets over the fair value of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment. The test is performed more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Impairment is tested by comparing fair value of the goodwill to its carrying value. Any excess of carrying value over fair value is charged to earnings in the period in which impairment is determined. The Financial Accounting Standard ASU 2011-08 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Testing Goodwill for Impairment” allows the Company to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company would not be required to calculate the fair value unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. There are a number of events and circumstances for the Company to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. Management must complete this review by following the steps in ASC 350-20-35-3C to evaluate the fair value of the goodwill. As part of the review of the goodwill and on the understanding that examples included in ASC 350-20-35-3C are not exhaustive lists of items that should be considered; management must consider all known events, and circumstances that could trigger an impairment of goodwill. Estimating fair value is performed by utilizing various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow. The impairment review is highly judgmental and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions have a significant impact on the amount of any impairment charge recorded. Discounted cash flow methods are dependent upon assumptions of future sales trends, market conditions and cash flows of each reporting unit over several years. Actual cash flows in the future may differ significantly from those previously forecasted. Other significant assumptions include growth rates and the discount rate applicable to future cash flows.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, adopted January 1, 2008, defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The ~~carrying~~Company’s ~~amounts~~financial ~~reported~~instruments ininclude ~~the~~cash ~~balance~~and ~~sheets~~cash ~~for~~equivalents, current receivables and payables, ~~qualify~~and asderivative ~~financial instruments~~liabilities. ~~Management~~These ~~concluded~~financial ~~the~~instruments ~~carrying values~~ are ameasured ~~reasonable~~at ~~estimate~~their ofrespective fair ~~value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and if applicable, their stated interest rate approximates current rates available~~values. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value. It is management’s opinion that as of April 30, 2015 and 2014, the estimated fair values of the financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values as presented on the balance sheet. This is attributed to the short maturities of the instruments and that interest rates on the borrowings approximate those that would have been available for loans of similar remaining maturity and risk profile at respective balance sheet dates.

The Company has determined that certain convertible notes covered by these financial statements qualifies as derivative financial instruments under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic No. 815-40, “ Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in an Entity’s Own Stock”. See Note 14 for more details.

Estimating the fair value of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. The assumptions used to value the Company’s derivatives will have a direct effect on the fair values. In addition, valuation techniques are sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company’s common stock and its estimated volatility and interest rate changes and other variables or market conditions not within the Company’s control that can significantly affect management’s estimates of fair value and changes in fair value. Because derivative financial instruments are initially and

subsequently carried at fair value, the Company’s net income may include significant charges or credits as these estimates and assumptions change.

The fair value of the derivative liabilities was determined using the Black-Scholes Model with any change in fair value during the period recorded in earnings as “Change in fair value of derivative liabilities”. Significant inputs used to calculate the fair value of the derivative liabilities include expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield.

For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, prepaid expenses, and accounts payable and accruals, it is management’s opinion that the carrying values are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and if applicable, their stated interest rate approximates current rates available.

Management believes it is not practical to estimate the fair value of related party payables because the transactions cannot be assumed to have been consummated at arm’s length, the terms are not deemed to be market terms, there are no quoted values available for these instruments, and an independent valuation would not be practical due to the lack of data regarding similar instruments, if any, and the associated potential costs.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives its revenue from the sale of roasted coffee. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery occurs, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Coffees are considered delivered when title and risk have been transferred to the customer. Retail sales are recorded when payment is tendered at the point of sale. Wholesale sales are recorded upon delivery of coffee to the customers. In the People’s Republic of China, a value added tax (“VAT”) of 17% on invoiced amount is collected on behalf of tax authorities. Revenues represent the invoiced value of goods sold, net of VAT.

Advertising and Promotion Costs

23Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not incur any advertising costs.

Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not incur any advertising costs.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes pursuant to ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. ASC 740 requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes and allows recognition and measurement of deferred tax assets based upon the likelihood of realization of tax benefits in future years. Under the asset and liability approach, deferred taxes are provided for the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefits, or that future deductibility is uncertain. The provision for income taxes represents current taxes payable net of the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Comprehensive Income

The Company has adopted ASC 220, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, which requires inclusion of foreign currency translation adjustments, reported separately in its statement of stockholders’ equity, in other comprehensive income. During the periods presented, other comprehensive income includes cumulative translation adjustment from foreign currency translation.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is United States dollars (“USD”). The functional currency of the Company’s subsidiaries DTS8 Coffee and DTS8 Huzhou in the People’s Republic of China is Chinese currency Renminbi (“RMB”). Since RMB is not freely convertible into foreign currencies, all foreign exchange transactions involving RMB must take place either through the People’s Bank of China (the “PBOC”) or other institutions authorized to buy and sell foreign exchange. The exchange rate adopted for the foreign exchange transactions are the rates of exchange quoted by the PBOC.

The Company maintains its financial statements in the functional currency. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transaction. Exchange gains or losses arising from foreign currency transactions are included in the determination of net income (loss) for the respective periods.

For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries DTS8 Coffee and DTS8 Huzhou in the People’s Republic of China are maintained in RMB and translated into USD. Balance sheet accounts with the exception of equity are translated using the closing exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date, income and expense accounts are translated using the average exchange rate prevailing during the reporting period and the equity accounts were stated at their historical exchange rate.

Adjustments resulting from the translation or RMB to USD, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in ~~shareholder~~stockholders’s ~~equity, were losses of $ 5,731 and $4,618 as of April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively~~deficit.

The exchange rates used for foreign currency translation were as follows (USD$1 = RMB):

Period Covered	Balance Sheet Date Rates	Annual Average Rates
Year ended April 30, 2016	6.4589	6.3504
Year ended April 30, 2015	6.1137	6.1454
Year ended April 30, 2014	6.1580	6.1483

Related Parties

A party is considered to be related to the Company if the party directly or indirectly or through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. A party which can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or if it has an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests is also a related party.

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. If applicable, diluted earnings per share assume the conversion, exercise or issuance of all common stock instruments, such as convertible note payable, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share. The Company had no dilutive securities asfor ~~of April 30, 2015 and 2014. For~~ the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014, basic and diluted loss per share was the same due to the Company’s loss position~~2015.

Stock Issued for Services

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees in accordance with FASB ASC 718 which requires companies to measure the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based upon the grant-date fair value of the award. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Stock-based compensation awards to non-employees are accounted for in accordance with ASC 505-50.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~May~~July ~~2014~~2015, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014~~2015-0911, “~~Revenue~~Inventory ~~from~~(Topic ~~contracts~~330): ~~with~~Simplifying ~~Customers~~the ~~(Topic~~Measurement ~~606)~~of Inventory”. ~~This~~The amendments in ASU ~~affects~~2015-11 ~~any~~require an entity ~~that~~to ~~either~~measure ~~enters~~in ~~into~~scope ~~contracts~~inventory ~~with~~at ~~customers~~the tolower ~~transfer~~of ~~goods~~cost orand ~~services~~net orrealizable ~~enters~~value. ~~into~~Net ~~contracts~~realizable ~~for~~value is the ~~transfer~~estimated ofselling ~~non-financial~~prices ~~assets.~~in ~~This~~the ~~ASU~~ordinary ~~will~~course ~~supersede~~of ~~the~~business, ~~revenue~~less ~~recognition~~reasonably ~~requirements~~predictable incosts ~~Topic~~of ~~605~~completion, ~~Revenue Recognition~~disposal, and ~~most~~transportation. ~~industry-specific~~Subsequent ~~guidance~~measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method. The ~~ASU~~amendments ~~also~~do ~~supersedes~~not ~~some~~apply ~~cost~~to ~~guidance~~inventory ~~included~~that inis ~~Subtopic~~measured ~~605~~using last-35in, ~~Revenue Recognition~~first-~~Construction-Type~~out ~~and~~(LIFO) ~~Production-Type~~or ~~Contracts.~~the ~~The~~retail ~~core~~inventory ~~principle~~method. ofThe ~~the~~amendments ~~guidance~~apply isto ~~that~~all another ~~entity~~inventory, ~~should~~which ~~recognize~~includes ~~revenue~~inventory tothat ~~depict~~is ~~the~~measured ~~transfer~~using offirst-in, ~~promised~~first-out ~~goods~~(FIFO) or ~~services~~average tocost. ~~customers~~The amendments in anthis ~~amount~~ASU ~~that~~are ~~reflects~~effective ~~the~~for ~~consideration~~public tobusiness ~~which~~entities ~~the~~for ~~entity~~fiscal ~~expects~~years tobeginning beafter ~~entitled~~December in15, ~~exchanged~~2016, ~~for~~including ~~those~~interim ~~goods~~periods orwithin ~~services~~those fiscal years. ~~The~~For ~~standard~~all isother entities, the amendments are effective for ~~annual~~fiscal ~~reporting~~years ~~periods~~ beginning after December 15, 2016, ~~including~~and interim periods within ~~that~~fiscal ~~reporting~~years ~~period~~beginning after December 15, 2017. ~~The~~A ~~Company~~reporting isentity ~~currently~~should inapply the ~~process~~amendments ofprospectively ~~evaluating~~with ~~the~~earlier ~~impact~~application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have a material impact on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period”. The amendments in the ASU require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 24

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date”. The amendments in ASU 2015-14 defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. The amendments in ASU 2015-17 eliminates the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments may be applied prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things, requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; Requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; Requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); Eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The new guidance permits early adoption of the own credit provision. In addition, the new guidance permits early adoption of the provision that exempts private companies and not-for-profit organizations from having to disclose fair value information about financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. Among other things, in the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: A lease liability, which is a lessee‘s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all public business entities and all nonpublic business entities upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-03, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350); Business Combinations (Topic 805); Consolidation (Topic 810); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effective Date and Transition Guidance”. The amendments in this ASU make the guidance in ASUs 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-07, and 2014-18 effective immediately by removing their effective dates. The amendments also include transition provisions that provide that private companies are able to forgo a preferability assessment the first time they elect the accounting alternatives within the scope of this ASU. Any subsequent change to an accounting policy election requires justification that the change is preferable under Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. The amendments in this ASU also extend the transition guidance in ASUs 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-07, and 2014-18 indefinitely. While this ASU extends transition guidance for Updates 2014-07 and 2014-18, there is no intention to change how transition is applied for those two ASUs. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016- 10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. The amendments add further guidance on identifying performance obligations and also to improve the operability and understandability of the licensing implementation guidance. The amendments do not change the core principle

of the guidance in Topic 606. Public entities should apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2015~~2017, including interim reporting periods therein. ~~Earlier~~Early ~~adoption~~application for public entities is permitted. ~~The~~only ~~adoption~~as of ~~this~~annual ~~standard~~reporting isperiods ~~not~~beginning ~~expected~~after toDecember ~~have~~15, a2016, ~~material~~including ~~impact~~interim onreporting ~~the~~periods within that reporting period. The Company’s ~~financial~~is ~~position~~currently ~~and~~in ~~results~~the process of ~~operations.~~evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In ~~August~~May ~~2014~~2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014~~2016-1511, “~~Disclosure~~Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of ~~Uncertainties~~SEC ~~about~~Guidance anBecause ~~Entity’s~~of ~~Ability~~Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to ~~Continue~~Staff asAnnouncements aat ~~Going~~the ~~Concern~~March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting”. The amendments inrescinds ~~the~~SEC ~~ASU~~paragraphs ~~provide~~pursuant ~~guidance~~to ontwo ~~determining~~SEC ~~when~~Staff ~~and~~Announcements ~~how~~at tothe ~~disclose~~March ~~going~~3, ~~concern~~2016 ~~uncertainties~~Emerging inIssues ~~the~~Task ~~financial~~Force ~~statements~~(EITF) meeting. ~~The~~Specifically, ~~new~~registrants ~~standard~~should ~~requires~~not ~~management~~rely toon ~~perform~~the ~~interim~~following ~~and~~SEC ~~annual~~Staff ~~assessments~~Observer comments upon adoption of anTopic ~~entity’s~~606: ~~ability~~(1) toRevenue ~~continue~~and asExpense aRecognition ~~going~~for ~~concern~~Freight ~~within~~Services ~~one~~in ~~year~~Process, ofwhich ~~the~~is ~~date~~codified ~~the~~in ~~financial~~paragraph ~~statements~~605-20-S99-2; ~~are~~(2) ~~issued.~~Accounting Anfor ~~entity~~Shipping ~~must~~and ~~provide~~Handling ~~certain~~Fees ~~disclosures~~and ifCosts, ~~conditions~~which oris ~~events~~codified ~~raise~~in ~~substantial~~paragraph ~~doubt~~605-45-S99-1; ~~about~~(3) ~~the~~Accounting ~~entity’s~~for ~~ability~~Consideration toGiven ~~continue~~by asa Vendor to a ~~going~~Customer ~~concern.~~(including ~~The~~Reseller ~~amendments~~of inthe ~~this~~Vendor’s ~~ASU~~Products), ~~are~~which ~~effective~~is ~~for~~codified ~~annual~~in ~~periods~~paragraph 605-50-S99-1; and ~~interim~~(4) ~~periods~~Accounting ~~within~~for ~~those~~Gas-Balancing ~~annual~~Arrangements ~~periods~~(i.e., ~~beginning~~use ~~after~~of ~~December~~the 15“entitlements method”), ~~2016~~which is codified in paragraph 932-10-S99-5. ~~Earlier~~The ~~adoption~~amendment is ~~permitted~~effective upon adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In ~~April~~May ~~2015~~2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2015~~2016-0312, “~~Simplifying~~Revenue ~~the~~from ~~Presentation~~Contracts ofwith ~~Debt~~Customers ~~Issuance~~(Topic ~~Costs~~606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”. The amendments, inamong other things: (1) clarify the ~~ASU~~objective ~~are~~of ~~intended~~the collectibility criterion for applying paragraph 606-10-25-7; (2) permit an entity to ~~simplify~~exclude ~~the~~amounts ~~presentation~~collected offrom ~~debt~~customers ~~issuance~~for ~~costs~~all sales (and ~~require~~other similar) taxes from the transaction price; (3) specify that ~~debt~~the ~~issuance~~measurement ~~costs~~date ~~related~~for tononcash consideration is contract inception; (4) provide a ~~recognized~~practical ~~debt~~expedient ~~liability~~that bepermits an entity to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications that occur before the beginning of the earliest period presented inwhen identifying the ~~balance~~satisfied ~~sheet~~and asunsatisfied aperformance ~~direct~~obligations, ~~deduction~~determining ~~from~~the transaction price, and allocating the ~~carrying~~transaction ~~amount~~price ofto the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations; (5) clarify that ~~debt~~a ~~liability,~~completed ~~consistent~~contract ~~with~~for ~~debt~~purposes ~~discounts.~~of ~~The~~transition ~~recognition~~is a contract for which all (or substantially all) of the revenue was recognized under legacy GAAP before the date of initial application, and ~~measurement~~(6) clarify that an entity that retrospectively applies the guidance ~~for~~in ~~debt~~Topic ~~issuance~~606 ~~costs~~to ~~are~~each prior reporting period is not ~~affected~~required byto disclose the ~~amendments~~effect inof ~~this~~the ~~ASU.~~accounting ~~The~~change ~~amendments~~for inthe ~~this~~period ~~ASU~~of adoption. These amendments are effective for public ~~business~~ entities for ~~financial~~annual ~~statements~~reporting ~~issued~~periods ~~for fiscal years~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2015~~2017, ~~and~~including interim reporting periods ~~within~~therein ~~those fiscal years~~(i.e., ~~Early~~January ~~adoption~~1, is2018, ~~permitted~~ for ~~financial~~a ~~statements~~calendar ~~that~~year ~~have not been previously issued~~entity). The ~~adoption~~Company ~~of this standard~~ is ~~not~~currently ~~expected~~in tothe ~~have~~process aof ~~material~~evaluating the impact onof the ~~Company’s~~adoption ~~financial~~on ~~position~~its ~~and~~consolidated ~~results~~financial ~~of operations~~statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. These amendments provide cash flow statement classification guidance for: (1) Debt Prepayment or Debt Extinguishment Costs; (2) Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments or Other Debt Instruments with Coupon Interest Rates That Are Insignificant in Relation to the Effective Interest Rate of the Borrowing; (3) Contingent Consideration Payments Made after a Business Combination; (4) Proceeds from the Settlement of Insurance Claims; (5) Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Policies, including Bank-Owned Life Insurance Policies; (6) Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees; (7) Beneficial Interests in Securitization Transactions; and (8) Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle. These amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control”. These amendments change the evaluation of whether a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity by changing how a reporting entity that is a single decision maker of a variable interest entity treats indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity. If a reporting entity satisfies the first characteristic of a primary beneficiary (such that it is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity), the amendments require that reporting entity, in determining whether it satisfies the second characteristic of a primary beneficiary, to include all of its direct variable interests in a variable interest entity and, on a proportionate basis, its indirect variable interests in a variable interest entity held through related parties, including related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity adopts the pending content that links to this paragraph in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 5 – INVENTORY

Inventories consist of the following:

		April 30, 2015	April 30, 2014
Raw materials - Green beans	$	45,245	16,280
Finished products - Roasted coffee		7,053	11,560
Packing products		5,852	8,807
Total	$	58,150	36,647


		April 30, 2016	April 30, 2015
Raw materials - Green beans	$	6,770	45,245
Finished products - Roasted coffee		3,551	7,053
Packing products		1,175	5,852
Total	$	11,496	58,150

NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The following is a summary of property and equipment and accumulated depreciation:

		April 30, 2015	April 30, 2014
		April 30, 2016	April 30, 2015
Machinery	$	9792,~~950~~715	97,450
Production equipment		4,~~906~~606	54,~~040~~906
Office equipment		1210,~~424~~212	1512,~~589~~424
Leasehold improvements		1726,~~992~~785	3217,~~316~~992
Less accumulated depreciation		(7887,~~365~~466)	(7778,~~977~~365)
	$	5446,~~907~~852	7254,~~418~~907

Depreciation expenses were $1614,~~527~~872 and $2016,~~031~~527 in the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

NOTE 7 – GOODWILL

On April 30, 2012, the Company’s acquisition of DTS8 Holdings resulted in recording of goodwill of $4,402,737. As detailed in ASC 350 “Intangibles-Goodwill”, the Company tests for goodwill impairment at end of its fiscal year and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets exceeds its fair value and may not be recoverable. On April 30, 2015 ~~and 2014~~, in accordance with ASC 350-20-35-3A, the Company performed a test for goodwill impairment. Management completed a qualitative analysis to determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting entity is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. To complete this review, management followed the steps in ASC 350-20-35-3C to evaluate the fair value of the goodwill. As part of management’s review of the goodwill and on the understanding that examples included in ASC 350-20-35-3C are not exhaustive lists of items that should be considered, management considered all known events, and circumstances that could trigger an impairment of goodwill. Management concluded that events rose indicating impairment of the goodwill during the years ended April 30, 2015. The general economic conditions in Shanghai, China, are considered positive. However, the events indicating impairment included the Company’s inability to raise large public or private equity financing in the United States. The Company’s ability to access capital to fund its business operations remained weak and challenging during the years ended April 30, 2015. The differing cultures, consumer preferences, corruption, anti-Chinese sentiments, diverse uncertain government regulations, tax systems and currency regulations are business risks impacting the Company’s current operations. In addition, there are no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional new license, permits or other approvals on a cost-effective basis or in a timely manner to prevent disruption to its business and operations in Huzhou and Shanghai, China. In addition, the Company has limited revenue and accumulated losses. It requires working capital to fund its business, and be successful in generating increased revenue. Accordingly, based on a qualitative assessment it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount of the goodwill. Management carried the second step of the impairment testing procedure. It included determining the recoverable amount, book value and fair value of the reporting unit. Estimating fair value is performed by utilizing various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow. The impairment review is highly judgmental and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions have a significant impact on the amount of any impairment charge recorded. Discounted cash flow methods are dependent upon assumptions of future sales trends, market conditions and cash flows of each reporting unit over several years. Actual cash flows in the future may differ significantly from those previously forecasted. Other significant assumptions include growth rates and the discount rate applicable to future cash flows. Based on this evaluation, the recorded goodwill value exceeded the implied value of the goodwill. Accordingly, management recognized $3,010,758 of goodwill impairment loss for the year ended April 30, 2015. It is possible that the assumptions used by management related to the evaluation may change or that actual results may vary significantly from management's estimates.

26Changes in the carrying amount of the goodwill for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

of the goodwill. As part of management’s review of the goodwill and on the understanding that examples included in ASC 350-20-35-3C are not exhaustive lists of items that should be considered, management considered all known events, and circumstances that could trigger an impairment of goodwill. Management concluded that events rose indicating impairment of the goodwill during the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014. The general economic conditions in Shanghai, China, are considered positive. However, the events indicating impairment included the Company’s inability to raise large public or private equity financing in the United States. The Company’s ability to access capital to fund its business operations remained weak and challenging during the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014. The differing cultures, consumer preferences, corruption, anti-Chinese sentiments, diverse uncertain government regulations, tax systems and currency regulations are business risks impacting the Company’s current operations. In addition, there are no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional new license, permits or other approvals on a cost-effective basis or in a timely manner to prevent disruption to its business and operations in Huzhou and Shanghai, China. In addition, the Company has limited revenue and accumulated losses. It requires working capital to fund its business, and be successful in generating increased revenue. Accordingly, based on a qualitative assessment it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount of the goodwill. Management carried the second step of the impairment testing procedure. It included determining the recoverable amount, book value and fair value of the reporting unit. Estimating fair value is performed by utilizing various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow. The impairment review is highly judgmental and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions have a significant impact on the amount of any impairment charge recorded. Discounted cash flow methods are dependent upon assumptions of future sales trends, market conditions and cash flows of each reporting unit over several years. Actual cash flows in the future may differ significantly from those previously forecasted. Other significant assumptions include growth rates and the discount rate applicable to future cash flows. Based on this evaluation, the recorded goodwill value exceeded the implied value of the goodwill. Accordingly, management recognized $3,010,758 and $1,391,979 of goodwill impairment loss for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. It is possible that the assumptions used by management related to the evaluation may change or that actual results may vary significantly from management's estimates.


April 30, 2014	Goodwill, net of impairment	$	3,010,758
	Impairment charge for the year ended April 30, 2015		(3,010,758)
April 30, 2015	Goodwill, net of impairment	$	-
	Impairment charge for the year ended April 30, 2016		-
April 30, 2016	Goodwill, net of impairment	$	-

~~Changes in the carrying amount of the goodwill for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:~~27

April 30, 2013	Goodwill, net of impairment	$4,402,737
	Impairment charge for the year ended April 30, 2014	$(1,391,979)
April 30, 2014	Goodwill, net of impairment	$3,010,758
	Impairment charge for the year ended April 30, 2015	$(3,010,758)
April 30, 2015	Goodwill, net of impairment	-

NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related party transactions are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

Upon the acquisition of DTS8 Holdings on April 30, 2012, the Company assumed a loan from Sean Tan to DTS8 Holdings. AsSean ofTan ~~April~~was ~~30,~~the ~~2015~~Company’s ~~and~~Chief ~~April~~Executive ~~30,~~Officer ~~2014,~~and ~~$120,000~~director ~~and~~until ~~$120~~August 10,~~000,~~ ~~respectively~~2015, ~~was~~when ~~recorded~~Sean asTan ~~loan~~resigned ~~from~~and ~~related~~Douglas ~~parties.~~Thomas ~~Sean~~replaced ~~Tan~~his isposition. ~~the~~As ~~Company’s~~of ~~Chief~~April ~~Executive~~30, ~~Officer~~2015, ~~and~~$120,000 ~~director.~~due Noto ~~interest~~Sean ~~payment~~Tan was ~~due.~~included ~~The~~in ~~loan~~due from related parties. The loan bears no interest and has no fixed term of repayment. The Company entered into a debt settlement agreement dated August 28, 2015 with Sean Tan ~~has~~to ~~agreed~~convert ~~not~~$120,000 toof ~~demand~~debt ~~payment~~owed ~~within~~by the ~~next~~Company, ~~fiscal~~at ~~year~~the price of $0.07 per share, being the closing stock price at August 28, 2015, for a total of 1,714,286 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a management agreement with ~~Mr.~~Sean Tan, the Company’s former officer and director, to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. ~~Mr.~~This ~~Tan’s~~contract ~~engagement~~was ~~commenced~~terminated oneffective ~~March~~August 110, ~~2011,~~2015. ~~and~~The ~~shall~~Company ~~continue~~entered oninto a ~~year-to-year~~debt ~~basis~~settlement ~~until~~agreement ~~terminated~~dated byAugust ~~either~~28, ~~party~~2015 ~~upon~~with 60Sean ~~days~~Tan ~~prior~~to ~~written~~convert ~~notice~~the tomanagement ~~the~~fee ~~other~~payment ~~party.~~of ~~The~~$128,000 ~~monthly~~owed ~~management~~by ~~fee~~the ~~payments~~Company, at the price of $60.07 per share,~~000~~ tobeing ~~Mr.~~the ~~Tan~~closing ~~are~~stock ~~paid~~price inat ~~arrears~~August on28, ~~the~~2015, ~~last~~for ~~day~~a total of ~~each~~1,828,571 ~~month~~shares of the Company’s common stock. As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~April 30, ~~$110~~2015,~~000~~ $nil and $99110,000 of management fees was owed to Mr. Tan, respectively.

InOn ~~February~~August 10, 2015, Company entered into a management agreement with Douglas Thomas to serve as the ~~Company~~President, ~~paid~~Chief ~~$13~~Executive Officer,~~170~~ asChief aFinancial ~~full~~Officer and ~~final~~Secretary ~~payment~~of ~~for~~the Company. Mr. Thomas’s engagement commenced on the ~~loan~~August ~~from~~10, 2015, and shall continue on a year-to-year basis until terminated by either party upon sixty days prior written notice to the ~~spouse~~other party. The Company shall make a monthly management fee payment of $6,000 to Mr. ~~Tan~~Thomas, ~~which~~in ~~was~~arrears, ~~recorded~~on asthe ~~loan~~25th ~~from~~day ~~related~~of ~~parties~~each month and 4 million restricted common shares of the Company as engagement bonus remuneration. As of April 30, ~~2014~~2016 and April 30, 2015, the Company owed Mr. Thomas $13118,~~143~~549 and $43,000, respectively. The balance of $43,000 as of April 30, 2015 was ~~owed~~included in accounts payable and accruals due to the ~~spouse~~fact ofthat Mr. ~~Tan~~Thomas was not a related party until August 10, 2015.

27On August 31, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Cherry Cai to serve as the financial controller of the Company commenced on September 1, 2015, and shall continue on a year-to-year basis until terminated by either party upon thirty days prior written notice to the other party. The Company shall make monthly fee payment of $3,000 to Cherry, in arrears, on 25th day of each month and issue 1 million shares of common stock of the Company. 500,000 shares were issued in September 2015 and balance of 500,000 shares was to be issued on September 1, 2016. As of the date of this Report, the Company has deferred the issuance the 500,000 shares to a later date. As of April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, the Company owed Ms. Cai $1,700 and $nil, respectively.

On April 30, 2012, upon its acquisition of DTS8 Holdings, the Company assumed a loan payable of $382,396 owed by DTS8 Coffee to a consultant who provides accounting and financial reporting services to the Company through his company from time to time on a monthly basis. The amounts owed, as loan payable, as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, were $~~382~~251,~~152~~027 and $~~379~~382,~~403~~152, respectively. InDuring ~~May~~the ~~2015~~year ended April 30, 2016, the Company paid $98110,~~140~~700 towards the outstanding loan payable~~, also see Note 16~~. The balance of the amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing, has no fixed term of repayment, and is repayable on demand, and the consultant has agreed not to demand payment within the next fiscal year. In addition, for the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, the Company owed the consultant $~~160~~251,~~800~~500 and $~~118~~160,~~900~~800, respectively, for consulting services provided to the Company. ~~Neither~~Accordingly, as of April 30, 2016 and 2015, the ~~consultant~~total ~~nor~~loans ~~his~~and ~~company~~consulting isfees aowed ~~shareholder~~to ofthis ~~the~~consultant ~~Company~~totaled $502,527 and $542,952.

During the year ended April 30, 2016, the Company made reimbursement to Alex Liang, the Company’s former Chairman and director, $7,503 for the consultant fee and travel expenses incurred for business operation purpose. As of April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, there was $nil due to this related party.

Also see Note 10 for common stock issued to related parties.

NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases its corporate office and coffee distribution and storage facility located at Building B, #439, Jinyuan Ba Lu, Jiangqiao Town, Jiading District, Shanghai 201812, China. A new lease commenced on October 1, 2013, and expires on September 30, 2017. The leased area is approximately 92 square meters (990 square feet).

The Company also leases a warehouse for its coffee roasting and manufacturing at 801 Jiahe Road, 2nd Floor, Nanxun Town, Huzhou City, 313009, Zhejiang, China. The leased area is approximately 1,041 square meters (11,205 square feet). The lease commenced on August 16, 2013, and expires on August 17, 2015.

Total lease payments for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 were $27,534 and $32,637, respectively. Future lease payments required subsequent to April 30, 2015, are as follows:

Years		Amount
April 30, 2016	$	3,920
April 30, 2017	$	4,015
April 30, 2018	$	1,673

NOTE 10 – COMMON STOCK

At April 30, 2015, the Company’s authorized capital was 75,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 34,791,666 shares were issued and outstanding.

In October 2013, the Company issued 65,000 restricted shares of common stock to a consultant at a fair market price of $0.20 per share as payment for consulting services. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price, was $13,000. For the year ended April 30, 2014, $13,000 was expensed as consulting fees.

In January 2014, the Company issued 600,000 restricted shares of common stock to a consultant at a fair market price of $0.36 per share as payment for consulting services. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price, was $216,000. For the year ended April 30, 2014, $216,000 was expensed as consulting fees.

In January 2014, the Company registered 900,000 shares of common stock on Form S-8 for the payment of services and fees in lieu of cash to two consultants for aggregate consideration of $288,000, the estimated fair market value of these shares. It was determined that $0.32 was the fair market value per share. For the year ended April 30, 2014, $192,000 was expensed as consulting fees and $96,000 as legal fees.

In April 2014, the Company issued 120,000 restricted shares of common stock to a consultant at a fair market price of $0.12 per share as payment for consulting services. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price, was $14,400. For the year ended April 30, 2014, $14,400 was expensed as consulting fees.

In April 2014, the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares of common stock to a director for consulting services at a fair market price of $0.12 per share as payment for consulting services. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price, was $60,000. For the year ended April 30, 2014, $60,000 was expensed as consulting fees.

InThe ~~April~~Company ~~2014,~~leases ~~the~~its ~~Company~~corporate ~~issued~~administration ~~583,333~~and ~~restricted~~sales ~~shares~~office ofand ~~common~~coffee ~~stock~~distribution tolocated ~~the~~at ~~spouse~~1379 ofXikang ~~the~~Road, ~~Company’s~~#110, ~~Chief~~Putuo ~~Executive~~District, ~~Officer~~Shanghai ~~and~~200060, ~~director~~China. atLease acommenced ~~price~~on ofJanuary ~~$0.12~~16, ~~per~~2016 ~~share,~~and inexpires ~~lieu~~on ofJanuary ~~cash~~31, to2017. ~~pay~~The ~~the~~lease ~~$70,000~~area ~~promissory~~is ~~note~~approximately ~~issued~~21.08 insquare ~~July~~meters ~~2013~~(227 square feet).

InThe ~~April~~Company ~~2014~~also leases a warehouse for its coffee roasting and manufacturing at 801 Jiahe Road, ~~the~~2nd ~~Company~~Floor, ~~issued~~Nanxun Town, Huzhou City, 313009, Zhejiang, China. The leased area is approximately 1,~~666~~041 square meters (11,~~667~~205 ~~restricted~~square ~~shares~~feet). ofThe ~~common~~lease ~~stock~~commenced aton aAugust ~~price~~18, of2012, $0and expired on August 17, 2015.12 ~~per~~This ~~share~~lease was extended for ~~cash~~additional ~~proceeds~~three ofand ~~$200~~half years expiring on August 17,~~000~~ 2019.

InTotal ~~July~~lease ~~2014,~~payments for the ~~Company~~years ~~issued~~ended 1April 30,~~000,000~~ ~~restricted~~2016 ~~shares~~and of2015 ~~common~~were ~~stock~~$30,795 toand ~~a consultant at a fair market price of~~ $~~0.16~~27,534, ~~per share as payment for consulting services~~respectively. ~~Total~~Future ~~value~~lease ofpayments ~~the~~required ~~services,~~subsequent ~~valued~~to atApril ~~the fair market price~~30, ~~was $160~~2016,~~000~~ ~~which~~are ~~was expensed~~ as ~~consulting fees.~~follows:

In July 2014, the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares of common stock at a price of $0.15 per share for cash proceeds of $75,000.


Years		Amount
April 30, 2017	$	33,718
April 30, 2018	$	31,140
April 30, 2019	$	32,281

InNOTE ~~October~~10 ~~2014,~~– ~~the~~COMMON ~~Company~~STOCK issued 300,000 restricted shares of common stock to a director at a fair market price of $0.31 per share as payment for consulting services. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price, was $93,000 which was expensed as consulting fees.

InAt ~~October~~April ~~2014~~30, 2016, the Company’s ~~issued~~authorized ~~930~~capital was 75,000,000 ~~restricted~~ shares of common stock atwith a ~~price~~par value of $0.15001 ~~per~~and ~~share~~52,336,499 ~~for~~shares ~~cash~~were ~~proceeds~~issued ofand ~~$139,500~~outstanding.

In ~~January~~June 2015, the Company issued ~~433~~2,~~333~~500,000 restricted shares of common stock at a price of $0.1502 per share for cash proceeds of $6550,000.

In ~~January~~August, 2015, the Company issued ~~120~~4,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to athe ~~consultant~~Chief atExecutive aOfficer ~~fair~~of ~~market~~the Company at a price of $0.1506 per share as payment for ~~consulting~~management ~~services~~fees. Total value of the services, valued atusing the ~~fair~~closing ~~market~~stock price on the issuance date, was $18240,000. ~~which~~For ~~was~~the ~~expensed~~year asended ~~consulting~~April ~~fees~~30, 2016, $240,000 was expensed.

In ~~April~~August, 2015, the Company issued ~~800~~1,100,000 restricted shares of common stock atto aAlex ~~fair~~Liang, ~~market~~its former Chairman and director (1,000,000) and to two employees (50,000 each) at a price of $0.~~085~~06 per share as payment for ~~consulting~~engagement ~~services~~bonus remuneration fees. Total value of the services, valued atusing the ~~fair~~closing ~~market~~stock price on the issuance date, was $6866,000,. ~~which~~For ~~was~~the ~~expensed~~year asended ~~consulting~~April ~~fees~~30, 2016, $66,000 was expensed.

~~NOTE~~In 11August –2015, ~~CONTRACTS~~the ~~AND~~Company ~~AGREEMENTS~~in lieu of cash payment issued 3,542,857 shares of the Company’s common stock as payment in full for the outstanding debts of $248,000 owed to the former director and the former Chief Executive Officer. The shares were issued at the price of $0.07 per share, being the closing stock price at August 28, 2015.

OnIn ~~March 31~~September, ~~2011~~2015, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~500,000 arestricted ~~management~~shares ~~agreement~~of ~~with~~common ~~Sean~~stock ~~Tan to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer~~ of the Company. ~~Mr. Tan’s engagement commenced on March 1, 2011, and shall continue on a year-~~to~~-year~~ ~~basis~~its ~~until~~financial ~~terminated~~controller byat ~~either party upon 60 days prior written notice to the other party~~$0.085 ~~The~~per ~~monthly~~share ~~management~~or ~~fee payments of~~ $642,~~000 to Mr~~500. ~~Tan~~For ~~are~~the ~~paid~~year inended ~~arrears~~April on30, ~~the~~2016, ~~last~~$42,500 ~~day~~was ~~of each month~~expensed.

In ~~July~~September, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~amended an agreement with a consultant to provide sales-related services to the Company until April 2015. The Company~~ issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock ~~for~~Company ~~payment~~to ofa ~~the~~consultant ~~consulting~~at ~~fees~~price ~~in lieu~~ of ~~cash~~$0.125 ~~for~~per ~~aggregate~~share ~~consideration~~as ofpayment ~~$160,000,~~for ~~the~~consulting ~~estimated~~fees. ~~fair~~Total ~~market~~ value of ~~these~~the ~~shares.~~services, Itvalued ~~was~~at ~~determined~~the ~~that~~fair ~~$0.16~~market ~~was~~price on the ~~fair~~issuance ~~market~~date, ~~value~~was ~~per share~~$125,000. For the year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016, $~~160~~125,000 was expensed as consulting fees.

In ~~April~~September, 2015, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~1,000,000 anshares ~~agreement~~of ~~with~~common astock ~~consultant~~ to ~~provide investor related services to~~ the Company’s ~~until~~attorney ~~April~~at ~~2016.~~price ~~The~~of ~~Company~~$0.125 ~~issued~~per ~~800,000~~share ~~shares~~as ofpayment ~~common stock~~ for ~~payment~~legal ~~of the~~ fees. inTotal ~~lieu~~value of ~~cash~~the ~~for~~services, ~~aggregate~~valued ~~consideration~~at ~~of $68,000,~~ the ~~estimated~~ fair market ~~value~~price ofon ~~these~~the ~~shares.~~issuance Itdate, was ~~determined that~~ $0125,000.~~085~~ ~~was the fair market value per share.~~ For the year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016, $68125,000 was expensed as ~~consulting~~legal fees.

In ~~October~~September ~~2013~~2015, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~230,769, an260,417 ~~agreement~~and ~~with a consultant to provide investor related services to the Company until April 2014. The Company issued 65~~316,~~000~~456 restricted shares of common stock ~~for payment~~ of the ~~fees~~Company ~~in lieu of cash~~ for anthe ~~aggregate~~conversion ~~consideration~~ of $1312,000, ~~the~~$15,000 ~~estimated~~and ~~fair market value of these shares. It was determined that~~ $0.20,000 ~~was~~of the ~~fair~~Note ~~market~~I ~~value~~described ~~per~~in ~~share.~~Note ~~For the year ended April 30~~14, ~~2014, $13,000 was expensed as consulting fees~~respectively.

On October 5, 2015, the Company issued 152,667 restricted shares of common stock of the Company for the conversion of the remaining principal of $7,000 and the accrued interest in the amount of $2,160 of Note I described in Note 14.

On October 1, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Carter, Terry & Company acting as the Company’s exclusive Financial Advisory Investment Bank and Placement Agent for an initial period of 60 days, and then reverting to a non-exclusive advisor for the next twelve consecutive (12) months. The Company agreed to issue 200,000 restricted shares of common stocks of the Company upon the execution of the agreement. Within two years period, the Company agreed on cash compensation fees subject to: a). 10 % of the amount up to $1,000,000; b). 8% up to 5,000,000 and c). 6% over 5,000,000 for any equity or hybrid

Inequity ~~January~~capital ~~2014,~~raised ~~the~~and ~~Company~~also ~~entered~~agreed ~~into~~to anpay ~~agreement~~restricted ~~with~~shares ~~the~~equal ~~Company’s~~to ~~attorney~~4% toof ~~provide~~capital ~~legal~~raised ~~services~~by tothe closing price of the ~~Company~~stock ~~until~~on ~~December~~the ~~31,~~date ~~2014~~of close. ~~The~~In October 2015, the Company issued ~~300~~200,000 restricted shares of common stock ~~for~~to ~~payment~~Carter, ofTerry ~~the~~& ~~legal~~Company ~~fees~~at inprice ~~lieu~~ of ~~cash~~$0.11 ~~for~~per ~~aggregate~~share ~~consideration~~as ofpayment ~~$96,000,~~for ~~the~~consulting ~~estimated~~fees. ~~fair~~Total ~~market~~ value of ~~these~~the ~~shares.~~services, Itvalued ~~was~~at ~~determined~~the ~~that~~fair ~~$0.32~~market ~~was~~price on the ~~fair~~issuance ~~market~~date, ~~value~~was ~~per share~~$22,000. For the year ended April 30, ~~2014~~2016, $9622,000 was expensed as ~~legal~~consulting fees.

In ~~January~~March ~~2014~~2016, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~500,000 anshare ~~agreement~~of ~~with~~common astock ~~coffee agronomist~~ to ~~provide~~a ~~coffee~~consultant ~~quality~~at ~~related~~price ~~services~~of ~~to the Company until December 31, 2014~~$0.145 ~~The~~per ~~Company~~share ~~issued 600,000 shares of common stock~~ for ~~payment of the~~ consulting fees. inTotal ~~lieu~~value of ~~cash~~the ~~for~~services, ~~aggregate~~valued ~~consideration~~at ~~of $192,000,~~ the ~~estimated~~ fair market ~~value~~price ofon ~~these~~the ~~shares.~~issuance Itdate, was ~~determined that~~ $072,500.32 ~~was the fair market value per share.~~ For the year ended April 30, ~~2014~~2016, $~~192~~72,~~000~~500 was expensed as consulting fees.

In ~~January~~April ~~2014~~2016, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~1,200,000 anshares ~~agreement~~of ~~with~~common astock ~~consultant~~ to ~~provide~~Alex ~~sales-related~~Liang, ~~services to~~ the Company’s ~~until~~former ~~November~~Chairman ~~30,~~and ~~2014.~~director ~~The~~at ~~Company~~price ~~issued~~of ~~600,000~~$0.042 ~~shares~~per ofshare ~~common~~for ~~stock~~previous ~~for~~service ~~payment~~provided ofto the ~~consulting~~Company ~~fees~~before inhis ~~lieu~~resignation. ofTotal ~~cash~~value ~~for~~of anthe ~~aggregate~~services, ~~consideration~~valued ofat ~~$216,000,~~ the ~~estimated~~ fair market ~~value~~price ofon ~~these~~the ~~shares.~~issuance Itdate, was ~~determined that~~ $050,400.36 ~~was the fair market value per share.~~ For the year ended April 30, ~~2014~~2016, $~~216~~50,~~000~~400 was expensed as consulting ~~fees~~fee.

In April ~~2014~~2016, the Company ~~entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor related services to the Company until April 2015. The Company~~ issued ~~120~~1,~~000~~041,667 restricted shares of common stock ~~for payment~~ of the ~~fees~~Company ~~in lieu of cash~~ for anthe ~~aggregate~~conversion ~~consideration~~ of $1425,~~400,~~000 ~~the estimated fair market value~~ of ~~these shares. It was determined that $0.12 was~~ the ~~fair~~Note ~~market~~II ~~value~~described ~~per~~in ~~share.~~Note ~~For the year ended April 30, 2014, $~~14~~,400 was expensed as consulting fees~~.

NOTE 1211 – CONCENTRATION RISK

The Company conducts business in China. Consequently, any political, economic and social unrest and/or instability in China may adversely affect the Company’s business operations. In particular, instability in the supply of raw green beans to China could result in a decrease in the availability of coffee beans needed for the continued operation and growth of the Company’s business. It could also lead to an increase in the purchasing costs and increased operating costs. This may adversely affect the Company’s business.

As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, approximately 90% of the Company’s revenue and 96% of the accounts receivables were derived from one customer. The Company anticipates that the reliance on one customer will decline in the future as it obtains new customers and increases its revenue.

NOTE 1312 – INCOME TAXES

United States

DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. was incorporated in the State of Nevada and is subject to the United States federal income tax. No provision for income taxes in the U.S. has been made as the Company has no U.S. taxable income for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015.

Hong Kong

DTS8 Holdings was incorporated in Hong Kong and, under the current Hong Kong Inland Revenue Ordinance, the Company is subject to 16.5% income tax on its taxable income generated from operations in Hong Kong. For the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, no provision for Hong Kong tax has been made as DTS8 Holdings has no taxable income generated from operations in Hong Kong during the year.

People’s Republic of China

The Company’s subsidiaries DTS8 Coffee, a WOFE corporation organized and existing in Shanghai under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, and DTS8 Huzhou, a corporation organized and existing in Nanxun, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, are governed by the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “EIT Law”). The Company is subject to tax at a statutory rate of 25% on income reported in the statutory financial statements. The EIT Law also imposes a withholding income tax of 10% on dividends distributed by a foreign invested enterprise to its immediate holding company outside of China, if such immediate holding company is considered as a non-resident enterprise without any establishment or place within China or if the received dividends have no connection with the establishment or place of such immediate holding company within China, unless such immediate holding company’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. According to the arrangement between Mainland China and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region on the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Prevention of Fiscal Evasion in August 2006, dividends paid by a foreign-invested enterprise in China to its direct holding company incorporated in Hong Kong will be subject to withholding tax at a rate of no more than 5% (if the foreign investor owns directly at least 25% of the shares of the FIE).

~~Administrative~~As ~~Region on the Avoidance~~ of ~~Double~~April ~~Taxation~~30, 2016 and ~~Prevention~~2015, ofthe ~~Fiscal~~Company ~~Evasion~~was still in ~~August~~loss ~~2006,~~position; ~~dividends~~therefore ~~paid~~no bydeferred atax ~~foreign-invested~~liability ~~enterprise~~was inrecognized ~~China~~related to ~~its~~the ~~direct~~undistributed ~~holding~~earnings ~~company incorporated in Hong Kong will be~~ subject to withholding tax ~~at a rate of no more than 5% (if the foreign investor owns directly at least 25% of the shares of the FIE)~~.

As of April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company was still in loss position; therefore no deferred tax liability was recognized related to the undistributed earnings subject to withholding tax.


	Year Ended April 30,
	2016		2015
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carrying forward	$	9,710	$	51,422
Total deferred tax assets		9,710		51,422
Valuation allowance		(9,710)		(51,422)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-	$	-

	Year Ended April 30,
	2015		2014
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carrying forward	$	51,422	$	58,958
Total deferred tax assets		51,422		58,958
Valuation allowance		(51,422)		(58,958)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-	$	-

Net operating loss carry forward of the Company, amounted to $38,839 and $205,745 for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The net operating loss carry forwards are available to be utilized against future taxable income for years through calendar year 2021. In assessing the reliability of deferred income tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As of April 30, 2016 and 2015, deferred income tax assets represented the operating loss carry forward of the Company’s subsidiaries, DTS8 Coffee and DTS8 Huzhou. Management believes that the Company’s cumulative losses arising from recurring business in recent years constituted significant negative evidence that deferred tax assets would not be realizable and this evidence outweighed the expectations that the Company would generate future taxable income. Therefore, a full valuation allowance has been provided against the Company’s deferred income tax assets as of April 30, 2016 and 2015.

~~Net~~The ~~operating loss carry forward of the~~ Company, ~~amounted~~accumulated tolosses ~~$205,745and $248,819~~ for the years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015; ~~respectively.~~therefore ~~The~~no ~~net operating loss carry forwards are available to be utilized against future taxable income for years through fiscal period 2019. In assessing the reliability of deferred income~~ tax ~~assets,~~provision ~~management~~was ~~considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized~~provided. The ~~ultimate~~reconciliation ~~realization~~between ~~of deferred tax assets is dependent upon~~ the ~~generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible~~U. ~~Management considers the scheduled projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment~~S. Asstatutory ~~of April 30, 2015 and 2014, deferred~~ income tax ~~assets~~rate represented the operating loss carry forward of the Company’s subsidiary, DTS8 Coffee. Management believes that the Company’s cumulative losses arising from recurring business in recent years constituted significant negative evidence that deferred tax assets would not be realizable and ~~this evidence outweighed~~ the ~~expectations that the~~ Company ~~would generate future taxable income. Therefore, a full valuation allowance has been provided against the Company~~’s ~~deferred~~effective ~~income~~ tax ~~assets~~rate is as ~~of April 30, 2015 and 2014.~~below:

The Company accumulated losses for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014; therefore no tax provision was provided. The reconciliation between the U.S. statutory income tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate is as below:


	Year Ended April 30,
	2016		2015

U.S. Federal income tax statutory rate		35%		35%
PRC statutory income tax rate (25%) difference		(10%)		(10%)
Changes in valuation allowance for DTA		(25%)		(25%)
Effective tax rate		0%		0%

	Year Ended April 30,
	2015		2014
U.S. Federal income tax statutory rate		35%		35%
PRC statutory income tax rate (25%) difference		(10%)		(10%)
Changes in valuation allowance for DTA		(25%)		(25%)
Effective tax rate		0%		0%

NOTE 13 – INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE COMPANY

~~NOTE~~Effective 14June –10, ~~INVESTMENT~~2014, INthe ~~JOINT~~Company ~~VENTURE~~owned ~~COMPANY~~a 19% equity interest in a joint venture company, Don Manuel (Shanghai) Investment Management Co. Ltd. (the “JV Company”), established in the Shanghai Tax Free Zone, to own, manage and operate Café De La Don Manuel branded coffee cafes throughout China. The agreement governing the creation and operation of the JV Company was dated May 27, 2014 and was valid until May 27, 2025. The registered capital of the JV Company is RMB 5 million (approximately $830,000). The Company’s share of the cash investment was $162,800 for the 19% equity interest. The Company paid $55,000 and the balance of $107,800 was payable in installments. The first café of the JV Company opened in October 2014 in the Bund area of Shanghai. Effective April 30, 2015, the Company relinquished its 19% equity interest in the JV Company due to disagreement with the JV Company shareholders. In addition, the Company forfeited $55,000 it paid as initial equity contribution. There are no additional payments to be made by the Company. For the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded $Nil and $55,000 as loss on investment in joint venture.

~~Effective~~NOTE ~~June~~14 ~~10,~~– ~~2014,~~CONVERTIBLE ~~the~~NOTE Company owned a 19% equity interest in a joint venture company, Don Manuel (Shanghai) Investment Management Co. Ltd. (the “JV Company”), established in the Shanghai Tax Free Zone, to own, manage and operate Café De La Don Manuel branded coffee cafes throughout China. The agreement governing the creation and operation of the JV Company was dated May 27, 2014, and was valid until May 27, 2025. The registered capital of the JV Company is RMB 5 million (approximately $830,000). The Company’s share of the cash investment was $162,800 for the 19% equity interest. The Company paid $55,000 and the balance of $107,800 was payable in installments. The first café of the JV Company opened in October 2014 in the Bund area of Shanghai. Effective April 30, 2015, the Company relinquished its 19% equity interest in the JV Company due to disagreement with the JV Company shareholders. In addition, the Company forfeited $55,000 it paid as initial equity

On March 6, 2015, the Company issued a convertible note (Note I) in the amount of $54,000. The note is due together with any interest on December 10, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”). The Company has to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance of the note at the rate of 8% per annum from March 10, 2015, until the Maturity Date. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid on the Maturity Date shall bear an interest at the rate of 22% per annum from the due date until the note is paid in full. The holder of the note shall have the right from time to time, and at any time during the period beginning on the date which is 180 days following the date of the note and ending on the later of: (i) the Maturity Date and (ii) the date of payment of the note, each in respect of the remaining outstanding principal amount of the note to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount of the note into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock of the Company. The

~~contribution.~~conversion ~~There~~price ~~are~~shall noequal, ~~additional~~subject ~~payments~~ to beequitable ~~made~~adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights offerings by the Company., ~~For~~61% multiplied by the ~~year~~market ~~ended~~price ~~April~~of ~~30,~~the ~~2015,~~average of the ~~Company~~lowest ~~recorded~~three ~~$55,000~~trading asprices ~~loss~~for onthe ~~investment~~common instock ~~joint~~during ~~venture~~the 10 trading days prior to the conversion date.

~~NOTE~~In accordance with ASC 815-15, –the ~~CONVERTIBLE~~Company ~~NOTE~~analyzed the conversion option of the note for derivative accounting consideration. The Company determined that the conversion option of the note should be classified as a liability once the conversion option becomes effective after 180 days because there is no limit to the number of shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion of the note.

On ~~March~~September 109, 2015, ~~the~~Note ~~Company~~I ~~issued~~became a convertible ~~note in the amount of $54,000~~. ~~The~~On ~~note~~September ~~is due together with any interest on December 10~~18, 2015, (the ~~“Maturity~~debt ~~Date”).~~holder ~~The~~converted ~~Company~~$12,000 ~~has~~of ~~to pay interest on~~ the ~~unpaid~~note ~~principal~~into ~~balance~~230,769 ofcommon ~~the~~shares ~~note~~ at ~~the~~a ~~rate~~conversion price of 8%$0.0520 per ~~annum~~share. ~~from~~On ~~March~~September 1025, 2015, ~~until~~ the ~~Maturity~~debt ~~Date.~~holder ~~Any~~converted ~~amount~~$15,000 of ~~principal or interest on~~ the note ~~which~~into is260,417 ~~not~~common ~~paid~~shares ~~on the Maturity Date shall bear an interest~~ at ~~the~~a ~~rate~~conversion price of ~~22%~~$0.0576 per ~~annum~~share. ~~from~~On ~~the~~September ~~due~~30, ~~date~~2015, ~~until~~ the ~~note~~debt isholder ~~paid~~converted in$20,000 ~~full. The holder~~ of the note ~~shall~~into ~~have the right from time to time~~316,456 ~~and~~common shares at ~~any~~a ~~time~~conversion ~~during~~price ~~the~~of ~~period~~$0.0632 ~~beginning~~per onshare. ~~the~~On ~~date~~October ~~which~~7, is2015, ~~180 days following~~ the ~~date~~debt ofholder ~~the~~converted ~~note and ending on~~ the ~~later~~remaining principal of: ~~(i)~~$7,000 ~~the Maturity Date~~ and ~~(ii)~~ the ~~date~~accrued ofinterest ~~payment of the note, each~~ in ~~respect of~~ the ~~remaining outstanding principal~~ amount of ~~the~~$2,160 ~~note~~into toa ~~convert~~total ~~all~~number ~~or any part~~ of ~~the~~152,667 ~~outstanding~~shares ~~and~~at ~~unpaid~~a ~~principal~~conversion ~~amount~~price of ~~the~~$0.0600. ~~note~~As ~~into fully paid and non-assessable shares~~ of ~~common~~April ~~stock~~30, of2016, the ~~Company.~~Note ~~The~~I ~~conversion~~of ~~price shall equal~~$54,000 ~~subject~~and toaccrued ~~equitable~~interest ~~adjustments~~of ~~for stock splits~~$2,160 ~~stock~~were ~~dividends~~fully orconverted ~~rights~~into ~~offerings by the Company~~960,309 ~~61%~~shares ~~multiplied by the market price~~ of the ~~average~~Company’s ~~of the lowest three trading prices for the~~ common stock ~~during the 10 trading days prior to the conversion date~~.

InOn ~~accordance~~October ~~with~~20, ~~ASC 815-15~~2015, the Company ~~analyzed~~issued ~~the~~two ~~conversion~~convertible ~~option~~promissory notes with same terms in a total amount of $210,000 (collectively, Note II) with a discount of 5%. The proceeds of $200,000 of the note ~~for~~were ~~derivative~~not ~~accounting~~received ~~consideration~~until October 23, 2015. The note is due together with any interest on April 19, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). The Company ~~determined~~has ~~that~~to pay interest on the ~~conversion~~unpaid ~~option~~principal balance of the note ~~should~~at bethe ~~classified~~rate asof a10% ~~liability~~per ~~once~~annum from October 23, 2015 until the ~~conversion~~Maturity ~~option~~Date. ~~becomes~~The ~~effective~~outstanding principal and interest at 120% may be redeemed within 90 days of closing and 130% after ~~180~~90 days. ~~because~~The ~~there~~conversion isprice noshall ~~limit~~equal, subject to equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights offerings by the ~~number~~Company, 61% of ~~shares~~the lowest daily volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the common stock toduring bethe ~~issued~~15 ~~upon~~trading days prior to the conversion ofdate. Upon default, the debt holder shall have the right to convert the note. Asinto shares of ~~April~~common ~~30,~~stock ~~2015,~~at an alternative conversion price equal to 50% of the ~~balance~~lowest ~~payable~~daily onVWAP of the ~~convertible~~common ~~note~~stock ~~was~~during ~~$54,651~~the ~~representing~~20 trading days prior to the ~~principal~~conversion ~~amount~~date. All overdue accrued and unpaid interest to be paid shall entail a late fee at an interest rate equal to the lesser of ~~$54,000~~18% ~~plus~~per ~~accrued~~annum or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law which shall accrue daily from the date such interest is due through and including the date of ~~$651~~actual payment in full.

~~NOTE~~On 16October –20, ~~SUBSEQUENT~~2015, ~~EVENTS~~Note II became convertible. On April 25, 2016, the debt holder converted $25,000 of the note into 1,041,667 common shares at a conversion price of $0.0240 per share. As of April 30, 2016, the balance payable on Note II of $185,000 and accrued interest of $10,897 was convertible.

InAs ~~May~~described ~~2015~~in Note 4, the embedded conversion feature for both Note I and Note II qualified for liability classification at fair value. As a result, the Company ~~paid~~recorded debt discounts resulting from derivative liabilities of $9854,~~140~~000 ofto anNote ~~outstanding~~I ~~loan~~and ~~payable~~$200,000 to aNote ~~consultant~~II at the dates the notes became convertible. ~~The~~Due ~~amount~~to ~~owed~~the asexcess of ~~April~~the 30fair value of derivative liabilities over the principal of the notes on the day when the notes became convertible, ~~2015~~the Company recorded loss on derivative liabilities in the amount of $292,718. This amount was included in change in fair value of derivative liabilities. In addition, the Company amortized the balance of debt discount of $~~382~~54,~~152~~000 associated to the exercise of the conversion option of Note I, and ~~after~~amortized the ~~payment,~~balance of debt discount of $~~284~~200,~~012~~000 ~~remained~~over ~~outstanding,~~the ~~also~~life ~~see~~of Note 8II.

Amortization of the debt discounts was recorded as a component of interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Amortization of debt discounts amounted to $254,000 and $0 for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Contractual interest expense for the two convertible notes amounted to $13,110 and $651 for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

On March 2, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note (Note III) in the amount of $73,000. The Note III is due together with any interest on December 4, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). The Company has to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance of the note at the rate of 8% per annum from March 2, 2016 until the Maturity Date. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid on the Maturity Date shall bear an interest at the rate of 22% per annum from the due date until the note is paid in full. The holder of the note shall have the right from time to time, and at any time during the period beginning on the date which is 180 days following the date of the note and ending on the later of: (i) the Maturity Date and (ii) the date of payment of the note, each in respect of the remaining outstanding principal amount of the note to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount of the note into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock of the Company. The conversion price shall equal, subject to equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights offerings by the Company, 63% multiplied by the market price of the average of the lowest three trading prices for the common stock during the 10 trading days prior to the conversion date. The note became convertible 180 days after its issuance on March 2, 2016 which was August 29, 2016.

As of April 30, 2016, the balance payable on the convertible notes was $258,000 representing the amounts owed for Note II of $185,000 and Note III of $73,000, respectively. The debt discount was nil as of April 30, 2016.

NOTE 15 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND THE FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company issued convertible notes and the conversion option embedded in the convertible notes contains no explicit limit to the number of shares to be issued upon settlement and as a result is classified as a liability under ASC 815 (see Note 15). The Company accounted for the embedded conversion option in accordance with ASC 815-40, which requires the Company to bifurcate the embedded conversion options as liability at the date when it becomes effective and to record changes in fair value relating to the conversion option liability in the statement of operations and comprehensive income as of each subsequent balance sheet date. The debt discount related to the convertible note is amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method.

The following table sets forth the Company’s consolidated financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy as of April 30, 2016. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of inputs that is significant to the fair value measurement.


		Total	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
LIABILITIES
Conversion option liability	$	293,606	-	-	293,606

The following is a reconciliation of the conversion option liability for which Level 3 inputs were used in determining the fair value:


Balance as of April 30, 2015		-
Fair value of embedded conversion option derivative liabilities at issuance charged to debt discounts	$	254,000
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		171,804
Reclassification of derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital due to conversions		(132,198)
Balance as of April 30, 2016	$	293,606

The Company’s conversion option liabilities are valued using pricing models and the Company generally uses similar models to value similar instruments. Where possible, the Company verifies the values produced by its pricing models to market prices. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, measures of volatility and correlations of such inputs. These consolidated financial liabilities do not trade in liquid markets, and as such, model inputs cannot generally be verified and do involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value at the commitment and re-measurement dates for convertible notes that are treated as derivative liabilities with embedded conversion features were based upon the following management assumptions for the nine months ended April 30, 2016:


	Commitment Date	Re-measurement Date
Exercise price	$0.0328 - $0.0645	$0.0285 - $0.0632
Expected dividends	0%	0%
Expected volatility	197.12% - 203.24%	197.30% - 270.20%
Expected term	5 months - 9 months	5 months - 9 months
Risk free interest rate	0.13% - 0.26%	0.07% - 0.32%

NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On March 1, 2016, the Company entered into a definitive Purchase and Sale Agreement to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of a coffee roasting and wholesale company located in the United States. Closing of the transaction is expected on or before August 1, 2016, which is defined as closing date in the agreement, subject to financing and receipt of 2015 audited financial statements and a number of conditions from the target company. The purchase price

for the acquisition is $4,500,000, in cash at closing, or, if the total amount is not paid in cash, $4,700,000 in cash and debt at closing. As of the filing date of this report, the Company has not closed on the transaction.

In May 2016, the Company issued 2,591,664 shares of common stock of the Company for the conversion of $50,000 of the Note II as described in Note 14 above. Under Note II a total of $75,000 was converted into 3,633,331 common shares of the Company. The remaining balance of Note II of $184,275 including accrued interest was paid in cash on May 24, 2016.

On May 23, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Thomas Prasil Trust U/A/D November 26, 2003, in the principal amount of $185,000, due and payable in full on November 20, 2016. The loan bears an annual interest rate of 20%. The Company paid a loan fee of 3,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company which was issued on May 25, 2016.

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a financial consultant agreement with a consultant and agreed to pay a fee of 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company based on the agreement, which were issued on June 1, 2016.

On August 5, 2016, the Company entered into a marketing service agreement with Emerging Markets Consulting and agreed to pay a fee of 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company based on the agreement, which were issued on August 6, 2016.

On September 21, 2016, the Company entered into a second loan agreement with Thomas Prasil Trust U/A/D November 26, 2003 in principal of $50,000, due and payable in full on December 31, 2016. The loan bears an annual interest rate of 20%. The Company agreed to pay a loan fee of 800,000 shares of common stock of the Company which was not issued as of the date of this Report.

ITEM 9

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls

Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, April 30, ~~2015~~2016 (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information relating to us required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control process has been designed, under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. Based on this assessment, management has determined that due to the material weaknesses described below, our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016 was not effective. Our management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (~~“COSO”~~i) ~~in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.~~

Inadequate segregation of duties;

(ii)

Lack of a functioning audit committee and outside directors on the Company's board of directors

prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, the systems can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.

This Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~There~~Except ~~have~~as ~~been~~noted above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the ~~quarter~~year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B

OTHER INFORMATION

~~None~~As of October 24, 2016, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control of financial reporting established in SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on this evaluation our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting has material weaknesses mainly due to the fact we have a sole director.

33The matter involving internal controls and procedures that the Company’s’ management considered to be a material weakness under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board was the lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls.

We have established a formal review process of significant accounting transactions that includes participation of the Chief Executive Officer, the Financial Controller and the Company’s corporate legal counsel and will form an Audit Committee made up of independent directors to be appointed when funding permits. We will then establish policies and procedures that will provide the Board of Directors a formal review process that will among other things, assure that management controls and procedures are in place and being maintained consistently.

The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by the Company's Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of April 30, 2016. Management believes that the material weakness identified above did not influence the Company's financial results. However, management believes that inadequate segregation of duties and lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's board of directors could result in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures in the Company's determination to its financial statements for future years.

We are committed to improving internal control over financial reporting. As part of this commitment, we will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to the Company.

In addition, we will appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to the audit committee of the Board of Directors, resulting in a fully functioning audit committee which will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures.

Management believes that the appointment of outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's Board.

In addition, management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the material weakness. This coupled with the appointment of additional outside directors will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues the company may encounter in the future.

We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary.

PART III

ITEM 10

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons

Set forth below is the name and age of each of our directors and executive officers as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, together with all positions and offices held by them, the term of office and the period during which they have served. All directors hold office for one year or until their successors are elected or appointed at the next annual meeting of our shareholders. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their resignation or removal from office. The names, ages and positions of our directors and executive officers as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, are as follows:

NAME	AGE	POSITION	APPOINTED	TERM
Sean Tan	48	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, Director	March 27, 2009 (inception)	One year
Doug Thomas	62	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officers, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officers, Director	August 10, 2015	One year
Alexander Liang	49	Chairman. Director	January 20, 2012	One year
Sean Tan	50	Former President, Former Chief Executive Officer, Former Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Former Principal Accounting Officer, Director	March 27, 2009 (inception)	Resigned August 10, 2015
Alexander Liang	51	Former Chairman and Director	January 20, 2012	Resigned February 22, 2016

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during the past five years of our directors and officers, indicating their principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.

~~Sean~~Douglas ~~Tan~~Thomas, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, Director

As our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer, Mr. ~~Tan~~Thomas is responsible for the general direction of our business development including day-to-day management of business affairs.

Mr. ~~Tan~~Thomas ~~graduated~~has ~~with~~worked afor ~~Bachelor’s~~the ~~degree~~past intwenty-five ~~Economics~~years ~~and~~as ~~Political~~an ~~Science~~independent ~~from~~marketing ~~Northern~~consultant ~~Illinois~~and ~~University~~brings extensive inworldwide ~~May~~oilfield ~~1987,~~marketing and asales ~~Master’s~~experience ~~degree~~to inthe ~~Public~~Company. Mr. ~~Administration~~Thomas ~~from~~has ~~Pennsylvania~~worked ~~State~~on ~~University~~delivery inof ~~December~~marketing ~~1988. Mr.~~initiatives ~~Tan~~of ~~completed~~manufactured anproducts ~~Investment~~and ~~Funds~~introduced innew ~~Canada~~oilfield ~~program~~products to markets in ~~2002~~North and aSouth ~~Branch~~America, ~~Compliance~~Russia, ~~Officer’s~~China ~~Course~~and inAustralia. From ~~2004~~August, ~~with~~2007 ~~the~~to ~~Institute~~February of2011, ~~Canadian Bankers.~~ Mr. ~~Tan~~Thomas iswas ~~also~~ a ~~graduate~~director, ofPresident ~~the~~and ~~Canadian~~Chief ~~Accredited~~Executive ~~Insurance~~Officer ~~Brokers~~of ~~program~~a inreporting ~~2006~~issuer, ~~with~~Rival ~~the~~Technologies, ~~Insurance~~Inc. ~~Brokers~~Mr. ~~Association~~Thomas ~~and~~was ~~the~~appointed ~~Life~~to ~~Insurance~~the ~~courses~~DTS8 inCoffee ~~2002~~board ~~and~~on ~~2003,~~August ~~respectively~~10, ~~with the Insurance Council of British Columbia~~2015.

Since 1989, Mr. Tan has worked as a financial consultant and advisor. In 1989, Mr. Tan was an Account Officer with the Southern Bank in Malaysia and from 1990 to 1992, he was a financial consultant with KPMG in Malaysia. He worked at the Royal Bank of Canada from 1993 to 1994, and from 1994 to 1998, Mr. Tan was employed at the Business Development Bank of Canada as an Account Manager handling commercial loans for small businesses as well as knowledge-based industries. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Tan was employed with Banca Commerciale Italiana as an Account Manager for Private and Corporate Banking. Since 2002, Mr. Tan has been in the insurance business as an independent licensed insurance agent and a registered mutual funds sales consultant. Mr. Tan became a director and President of Growers Direct Coffee Company Inc. in November 2008. Since February 2008, Mr. Tan has been the Chief Executive Officer of DTS8 Holdings, and in March 2013, he was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of DTS8 Huzhou. Mr. Tan has a wide range of experience in management and finance.

Alexander Liang, Chairman & Director

Alexander Liang was appointed as our director on January 20, 2012 and as our Chairman on May 5, 2014. Since June 2006, Mr. Liang has been a self-employed real estate valuation consultant. From July 2000 to June 2006, Mr. Liang was employed as an insurance representative with RBC Royal Bank and CF Canada Financial. Mr. Liang graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree from Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada in April 1992. Mr. Liang is experienced in real estate and finance.

Significant Employees

As of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, we did not have any employees who are expected to make a significant contribution to our business.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships, ~~except~~among ~~certain~~directors ~~family~~or ~~members~~executive ~~who may become shareholders by purchasing shares of our common stock~~officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Mr. Thomas has not been involved in any legal proceedings that are material to an evaluation of his ability or integrity.

None of our directors or officers has filed any bankruptcy petition.

Mr. Tan became a director and President of Growers Direct Coffee Company Inc. (“Growers Direct”) in November 2008 and in January 2009, Growers Direct filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in Las Vegas, Nevada under the Federal Bankruptcy Code of the United States. Growers Direct, since 2004, was involved in the sale of coffee and owned and operated a coffee roaster, Uncommon Grounds Inc., in San Francisco, California. Mr. Tan was not the founder of Growers Direct and his involvement followed several changes in the management of Growers Direct. However, due to the recession it became impossible to obtain the necessary funding to restructure the debts of Growers Direct. Due to the limited availability of funding and existing recessionary conditions in the United States, Growers Direct did not have sufficient funding to continue its operations prior to Mr. Tan’s appointment as President. Mr. Tan’s primary role after being appointed President in November 2008 was to prepare Growers Direct for bankruptcy protection.

None of our directors or officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding.

None of our directors or officers has been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, them from acting as a futures commission, merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, or any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of such, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities or as an affiliated person, director or employee of an investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity; engaging in any type of business practice; or engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws. None of our directors or officers has been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of securities or banking activities.

None of our directors or officers has been convicted of violating a federal or state securities or commodities law.

None of our directors or officers has been subject or a party to any sanction or order of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act, any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent.

Code of Ethics

Effective March 30, 2010, our board of directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, our President (being our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (being our principal financial and accounting officer and controller), as well as persons performing similar functions. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public communications made by us;

compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and

accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our personnel be accorded full access to our President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to any matter which may arise relating to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Further, all of our personnel are to be accorded full access to our board of directors if any such matter involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by our President or Chief Financial Officer.

In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly managers and/or supervisors, have a responsibility for maintaining our financial integrity, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal, provincial and state securities laws. Any employee who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to his or her immediate supervisor or to our President or Chief Financial Officer. If the incident involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the President or Chief Financial Officer, the incident must be reported to any member of our board of directors. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was filed with the SEC as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-1. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any person without charge, upon request directed to: DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd., ~~Suite~~World HTrade Center, ~~2248~~999 ~~Meridian~~Canada ~~Blvd~~Place, ~~Minden~~Suite 404, ~~Nevada~~Vancouver, ~~89423~~B.C. V6C 3E2 Canada. Our telephone number is ~~775-360-3031~~1 or604 ~~011-86-18101819011~~641 1228 and our electronic mail address is ~~sean@dts8coffee.com or~~ info@dts8coffee.com.

~~Audit Committee~~37

Our board of directors performs the function of an audit committee and includes Sean Tan and Alexander Liang, neither of whom is considered to be independent. We will appoint additional independent directors to our board and committees in the future. We do not have any independent board members on our audit committee who are considered to be financial experts. We do not have an audit committee financial expert, or any committee or person performing a similar function. We currently have limited working capital and revenues. Management does not believe that it would be in our best interests at this time to retain independent directors to sit on an audit committee.

Board of Directors

As of the date of this Report, we have ~~two~~only ~~directors~~one ondirector, ~~our~~Mr. ~~board:~~Douglas ~~Sean~~Thomas, ~~Tan~~on ~~and~~our ~~Alexander Liang~~board. The ~~directors~~director ~~are~~is not considered to be independent as he is also the president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, secretary, treasurer of the Company. We In the future, we plan to appoint additional independent directors to our board and committees ~~in the future~~. Our directors are reimbursed for expenses, if any, for attendance at meetings of the board of directors. Our board of directors may designate from among its members an executive committee and one or more other committees but has not done so to date. We do not have a nominating committee or a nominating committee charter. Further, we do not have a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders. ~~To date, no security holders have made any such recommendations.~~ Our directors perform all functions that would otherwise be performed by committees. Given the present size of our board it is not practical for us to have committees. If we are able to grow our business and increase our operations we intend to expand the size of our board and allocate responsibilities accordingly

Audit Committee

As sole director, Mr. Thomas performs the function of an audit committee and is not considered to be independent. We will appoint additional independent directors to our board and committees in the future. We do not have any independent board members on our audit committee who are financial experts. We do not have an audit committee financial expert, or any committee or person performing a similar function. We currently have limited working capital and revenues. Management does not believe that it would be in our best interests at this time to retain independent directors to sit on an audit committee.

Corporate Governance

As of the date of this Report, no material changes were made to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

To the best of our knowledge based on the available information as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, all our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities filed all Section 16(a) reports with the SEC in a timely manner and provided us with copies of initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities on Forms 3, 4, 5 and amendments thereto respectively in accordance with the requirements of the Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

ITEM 11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our officers, directors and employees' annual and long-term compensation for the fiscal years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015. For the year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016, ~~Sean~~Douglas ~~Tan~~Thomas, our Chief Executive Officer, was paid monthly management fees of $6,000 commencing August 2015. We do not currently have any employment related benefits, such as health or life insurance, available for our officers, directors and employees. Our directors, officers and employees do not currently receive any long-term compensation.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	~~Salary~~Bonus ($)	~~Bonus~~Stock awards($)	Option awards ($)	~~Stock~~Non-equity ~~awards~~incentive plan compensation ($)	Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)	~~Option~~All ~~awards~~other compensation ($)	Total ($)	~~Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)~~		~~Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)~~		~~All other compensation ($)~~		~~Total ($)~~
(a)	(b)	(c)	(cd)	(de)	(f)	(eg)	(h)	(fi)	(j)	~~(g)~~		~~(h)~~		~~(i)~~		~~(j)~~
Sean Tan President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer, Director	2015 2014	$72,000 $72,000			0 0		0 0	0 0	0 0		0 0		0 0		$72,000 $72,000
Douglas Thomas, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and Director	2016 2015	$24,000 $24,000	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 $240,000 (1)	$24,000 $264,000
Sean Tan Former President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and Director	2016 2015	0 $24,000	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	$0 $24,000

⁽¹⁾

In August 2015, we issued 4,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Thomas at a fair market price of $0.06 per share as payment for management fees. Total value of the fees, valued at the fair market price, was $240,000.

There are no annuity, pension or retirement benefits proposed to be paid to our officers, directors or employees in the event of retirement at normal retirement date.

No remuneration is proposed to be paid in the future either directly or indirectly by us to any officer or director.

Employment Agreements

On ~~March~~August 3110, ~~2011~~2015, wethe Company entered into a management agreement with ~~Sean~~Douglas ~~Tan~~Thomas to serve as ~~our~~the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company. Mr. Thomas will perform such duties customarily performed by the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and such other duties as reasonably requested by the Chairman or the Board of Directors of the Company. These duties will include, but not be limited to, signing SEC filings and certifications required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It is understood that Mr. ~~Tan~~Thomas has other business interests and responsibilities, but that he does not anticipate any significant time conflicts. Mr. Thomas will not accept any significant new engagements and will devote the time and attention necessary to fulfill these duties to the Company. Mr. Thomas’s engagement ~~commenced~~commences on ~~March~~the 1August 10, ~~2011~~2015, and shall continue on a year-to-year basis until terminated by either party upon 60sixty days prior written notice to the other party. WeThe Company shall make monthly management fee ~~payments~~payment of six thousand dollars ($6,000) to ~~Mr. Tan~~Thomas, in arrears, on the ~~last~~25th day of each month and four million (4 million) common shares of the Company as engagement bonus remuneration. In August 2015, we issued 4,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Thomas at a fair market price of $0.06 per share as payment for management fees. Total value of the fees, valued at the fair market price, was $240,000.

3739

Compensation of Directors

The members of our board of directors do not receive compensation, as such, at this time, but are paid consulting fees for specific services as incurred. As of the date of this Report, there are no other agreements or arrangements in place for the amount of annual compensation that our directors will receive in the future.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
(a)	(b)	( c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)
Sean Tan	$ 0	0	0	0	0	0	$ 0
Douglas Thomas	$ 0	0	0	0	0	0	$ 0
Alexander Liang	$ 0	0	0	0	0	93,000 (1)	$93,000
Alexander Liang (former Chairman and Director)	$ 0	0	0	0	0	50,400 (1)	$50,400

⁽¹⁾

In ~~October~~April ~~2014~~2016, we issued ~~300~~1,200,000 restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Liang at a fair market price of $0.31042 per share as payment for consulting services. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price, was $9350,~~000~~400.

Stock Option Grants

As of the date of this Report, we have not granted any stock options. We have not adopted any equity compensation plans since our inception.

Compensation Committee

As of the date of this Report, we have not established a compensation committee which is responsible for setting and administering the policies and programs that govern both annual compensation and stock option programs for our directors, executive officers and employees.

Indemnification

Under our bylaws, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding, including a lawsuit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in our best interest. We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in a proceeding as to which he is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney’s fees. With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or director is judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada. Regarding indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act, which may be permitted to directors or officers under Nevada law, we are informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

ITEM 12

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (1) each director, (2) each executive officer, (3) each significant employee, (4) our directors and officers as a group, (5) and each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock. Under relevant provisions of the Exchange Act, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if he or she has, or shares, the power to vote or direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of the security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. More than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities. The percentage ownership of each stockholder is calculated based on 3452,~~791~~336,~~666~~499 outstanding shares of our common stock as of April 30, ~~2015~~2016.

3840

Class of Stock	Name of Beneficial Owner ~~(1)~~	Number of Common Shares	Percentage of Class
Common shares	~~Sean~~Douglas ~~Tan~~ Thomas(13), President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, Director	135,~~713~~000,~~333~~000 (13)	399.4256%
Common shares	~~Alexander~~Sean ~~Liang~~Tan (21) ~~Chairman~~Former President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, Director	~~800~~3,~~000~~542,857 (21)	26.3077%
	Officers and Directors as a Group	14,513,133	41.72%
Common shares	Alexander Liang (2) Former Chairman, Director	3,000,000 (2)	5.73%
	Officers and Directors as a Group	11,542,857	22.06%

(1)

Sean Tan, Building B, #439, Jinyuan Ba Lu, Jiangqiao Town, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201812, China, . ~~Mr. Tan owns 13,130,000 shares of our common stock directly and 583,333 shares of our common stock indirectly through his spouse.~~

(2)

Alexander Liang, c/o DTS8 Coffee Company Ltd. Suite H, 2248 Meridian Blvd., Minden, Nevada 89423.

(3)

Douglas Thomas, #304, 5158 – 48 Avenue, Delta, B.C. V4K 5B6

Changes in Control

As of the date of this Report, our management is unaware of any existing or anticipated contract or arrangement, the operation of which may, at a subsequent date, result in a changes in our control.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We have not adopted any equity compensation plans since our inception.

ITEM 13

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions with Related Persons

Related party transactions are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

Upon the acquisition of DTS8 Holdings on April 30, 2012, wethe Company assumed a loan from Sean Tan to DTS8 Holdings. As ofSean ~~April~~Tan ~~30,~~was ~~2015~~the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and ~~April~~director ~~30,~~until ~~2014~~August 10, ~~$120~~2015,~~000~~ when Sean Tan resigned and ~~$120,000,~~Douglas ~~respectively,~~Thomas ~~was~~replaced ~~recorded~~his asposition. The loan from related parties. ~~Mr.~~bears ~~Tan~~no isinterest ~~our~~and ~~Chief~~has ~~Executive~~no ~~Officer~~fixed ~~and~~term ~~director~~of repayment. NoThe ~~interest~~Company ~~payment~~entered ~~was~~into ~~due.~~a ~~The~~debt ~~loan~~settlement ~~bears~~agreement nodated ~~interest~~August ~~and~~28, ~~has~~2015 nowith ~~fixed~~Sean ~~term~~Tan to convert $120,000 of ~~repayment.~~debt Mrowed by the Company, at the fair market price of $0.07 ~~Tan~~per ~~has~~share, ~~agreed~~being ~~not~~the toclosing ~~demand~~stock ~~payment~~price ~~within~~at August 28, 2015, for a total of 1,714,286 shares of the ~~next~~Company’s ~~fiscal~~common ~~year~~stock. As of April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, $nil and $120,000, respectively, was recorded as due to related parties.

On March 31, 2011, wethe Company entered into a management agreement with ~~Mr.~~Sean Tan, the Company’s former officer and director, to serve as ~~our~~the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. ~~Mr.~~ ~~Tan’s~~This ~~engagement~~contract ~~commenced~~was onterminated ~~March~~effective 1,August ~~2011~~10, ~~and~~2015. ~~shall~~The ~~continue~~Company onentered into a ~~year-to-year~~debt ~~basis~~settlement ~~until~~agreement ~~terminated~~dated byAugust ~~either~~28, ~~party~~2015 ~~upon~~with 60Sean ~~days~~Tan ~~prior~~to ~~written~~convert ~~notice~~the tomanagement fee payment of $128,000 owed by the ~~other~~Company, ~~party. The~~at ~~monthly~~the ~~management~~fair ~~fee~~market ~~payments~~price of $60.07 per share,~~000~~ tobeing ~~Mr.~~the ~~Tan~~closing ~~are~~stock ~~paid~~price inat ~~arrears~~August on28, ~~the~~2015, ~~last~~for ~~day~~a total of ~~each~~1,828,571 ~~month~~shares of the Company’s common stock. As of April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, $nil and $110,000 of management fees was owed to Mr. Tan, respectively.

InOn ~~February~~August 10, 2015, weCompany ~~paid~~entered ~~$13,438~~into a management agreement with Douglas Thomas to serve as athe ~~full~~President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and ~~final~~Secretary ~~payment~~of ~~for~~the Company. Mr. Thomas’s engagement commenced on the August 10, 2015, and shall continue on a ~~loan~~year-to-year ~~from~~basis until terminated by either party upon sixty days prior written notice to the ~~spouse~~other party. The Company shall make a monthly management fee payment of ~~Mr.~~six ~~Tan~~thousand dollars ($6,000) ~~which~~to ~~was~~Thomas, ~~recorded~~in asarrears, ~~loan~~on ~~from~~the ~~related~~25th ~~parties~~day of each month and four million (4 million) restricted common shares of the Company as engagement bonus remuneration. As of April 30, ~~2014~~2016 and April 30, 2015, the Company owed Mr. Thomas $13118,~~143~~549 and $43,000, respectively. The balance of $43,000 as of April 30, 2015 was ~~owed~~included in accounts payable and accruals due to the ~~spouse~~fact ofthat Mr. ~~Tan~~Thomas was not a related party until August 10, 2015.

On ~~April~~August 3031, ~~2012~~2015, ~~upon~~the ~~our~~Company ~~acquisition~~entered ofinto ~~DTS8~~an ~~Holdings,~~agreement wewith ~~assumed~~Cherry aCai ~~loan payable of $382,396 owed by DTS8 Coffee~~ to aserve ~~consultant~~as ~~who~~the ~~provides accounting and~~ financial ~~reporting~~controller ~~services~~of tothe usCompany ~~through~~commenced ~~his~~on ~~company~~September ~~from~~1, ~~time~~2015, toand ~~time~~shall continue on a ~~monthly~~year-to-year basis~~. The~~ ~~amounts~~until ~~owed,~~terminated asby ~~loan~~either ~~payable,~~party asupon ofthirty ~~April~~days ~~30,~~prior ~~2015~~written ~~and~~notice ~~April~~to ~~30,~~the ~~2014,~~other ~~were $ 382,152 and $375,572, respectively~~party. In ~~May~~The ~~2015,~~Company weshall ~~paid~~make ~~$98,140~~monthly ~~towards~~fee ~~the~~payment ~~outstanding~~of ~~loan~~three ~~payable. The~~thousand ~~amount~~dollars ~~is unsecured~~($3,000) ~~non-interest~~to ~~bearing~~Cherry, ~~has~~in ~~no fixed term of repayment~~arrears, ~~and~~on is25th ~~repayable~~day onof ~~demand,~~each month and ~~the~~issue ~~consultant~~one ~~has~~million ~~agreed~~shares ~~not~~of tocommon ~~demand~~stock ~~payment~~of ~~within~~ the ~~next~~Company; ~~fiscal year. In addition~~500,000 ~~for~~shares ~~the~~were ~~years~~issued ~~ended~~in ~~April~~September ~~30,~~ 2015 and ~~2014,~~balance weof ~~owed the consultant $160~~500,~~800~~000 ~~and~~shares ~~$118,900,~~was ~~respectively,~~to ~~for~~be ~~the~~issued ~~consulting~~on ~~services~~September ~~provided~~1, ~~by the consultant~~2016. As ~~Neither~~of the ~~consultant~~date ~~nor his company is a shareholder~~ of ~~the~~this ~~Company.~~Report,

3941

the Company has differed the issuance the 500,000 shares to a later date. As of April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, the Company owed Ms. Cai $1,700 and $nil, respectively.

On April 30, 2012, upon its acquisition of DTS8 Holdings, the Company assumed a loan payable of $382,396 owed by DTS8 Coffee to a consultant who provides accounting and financial reporting services to the Company through his company from time to time on a monthly basis. The amounts owed, as loan payable, as of April 30, 2016, and 2015, were $251,027 and $382,152, respectively. During the year ended April 30, 2016, the Company paid $110,700 towards the outstanding loan payable. The balance of the amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing, has no fixed term of repayment, and is repayable on demand, and the consultant has agreed not to demand payment within the next fiscal year. In addition, for the years ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company owed the consultant $251,500 and $160,800 respectively for consulting services provided to the Company. Accordingly, as of April 30, 2016 and 2015, the total loans and consulting fees owed to the consultant totaled $502,527 and $542,952.

During the year ended April 30, 2016, the Company made reimbursement to Alex Liang, the Company’s former Chairman and director, $7,503 for the consultant fee and travel expenses incurred for business operation purposes. As of April 30, 2016, and April 30, 2015, there was $nil due to this related party.

On August 10, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to Alex Liang, the Company’s former Chairman and director at a price of $0.06 per share for service rendered to the Company. Total value of the services, valued using the closing stock price on the issuance date, was $60,000. For the year ended April 30, 2016, $66,000 was expensed as consulting fee.

On April 15, 2016, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock to Alex Liang, the Company’s former Chairman and director at price of $0.042 per share for previous service provided to the Company before his resignation. Total value of the services, valued at the fair market price on the issuance date, was $50,400. For the year ended April 30, 2016, $50,400 was expensed as consulting fee.

As of the date of this Report, there have been no other transactions or proposed transactions in the past two years in which we were or are a party to a transaction which has materially affected or will materially affect us in which any director, promoter, executive officer or beneficial holder of more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, or any of their respective relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates, has had or will have any direct or indirect material interest.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

We do not currently have any conflicts of interest by or among our current officers, director or advisors. We have established a Conflicts of Interest policy in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requiring officers and directors to take certain precautions and actions to protect us from potential risks that may arise from conflicts of interests between future officers, directors, vendors or customers. However, the Conflicts of Interest Policy contemplates a corporate structure that is not currently applicable to us and therefore is currently ineffective. In the future, we intend to appoint additional independent directors to our board of directors. Accordingly, conflicts of interest may arise which could influence these persons on evaluating possible acquisitions or in generally acting on our behalf as a result of their respective outside business interests. Directors are to act honestly and in good faith with a view to our best interests. In addition, directors in a conflict of interest position are required to disclose certain conflicts to us and to abstain from voting in connection with the matter.

To assist us in minimizing future conflicts of interest, related-person transactions must be approved by our board of directors composed of independent directors, who will approve the transaction only if they determine that it is in our best interests. In considering the transaction, the board of directors will consider various factors, including, as applicable: (i) the related person’s interest in the transaction; (ii) the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction; (iii) the approximate dollar value of the amount of the related person’s interest in the transaction without regard to the amount of any profit or loss; (iv) our business rationale for entering into the transaction; (v) the alternatives to entering into a related-person transaction; (vi) whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable to us than terms that could have been reached with an unrelated third party; (vii) the potential for the transaction to lead to an actual or apparent conflict of interest and any safeguards imposed to prevent such actual or apparent conflicts; (viii) the overall fairness of the transaction to us; (ix) valuations generated by independent third-party coffee brokers, if any, where the transaction in question is the purchase of coffee from a related party; and (x) any other information regarding the transaction or the related person in the context of the proposed transaction that would be material to investors in light of the circumstances of the particular transaction.

Director Independence

As of the date of this Report, we have ~~two~~one ~~directors~~director on our board, ~~Sean~~Douglas ~~Tan and Alexander Liang~~Thomas, ~~neither of~~ whom is not considered to be independent. We plan to appoint additional independent directors to our board and committees in the future. We do not have any independent board members onor ~~our~~an audit committee ~~who are~~ considered to be financial experts.

ITEM 14

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us by our auditor for services rendered during the fiscal years ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, are set forth in the table below:

Fee Category	Fiscal year ended April 30, ~~2015~~2016	Fiscal year ended April 30, ~~2014~~2015
Audit fees (1)	$42,000	$4042,000
Audit-related fees (2)	$2427,000	$24,000
Tax fees (3)
All other fees (4)	-$4,928	~~$1,000~~-
Total fees	$6673,~~000~~928	$6566,000

⁽¹⁾

Audit fees consist of fees incurred for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements, for reviews of our interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.

⁽²⁾

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, but are not reported under “Audit fees.”

⁽³⁾

Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.

⁽⁴⁾

All other fees consist of fees billed for all other services.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Practice

Our board of directors performs the function of an audit committee. Section 10A(i) of the Exchange Act prohibits our auditors from performing audit services for us as well as any services not considered to be audit services unless such services are pre-approved by our audit committee or, in cases where no such committee exists, by our board of directors (in lieu of an audit committee) or unless the services meet certain minimum standards.

4143

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibits

The following exhibits are included as part of this Report:


Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Articles of Incorporation ⁽¹⁾

3.2		By-Laws ⁽¹⁾

31.1		Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer

32.1		Rule 1350 Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer

101.INS ⁽²⁾		XBRL Instance

101.SCH ⁽²⁾		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL ⁽²⁾		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF ⁽²⁾		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB ⁽²⁾		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE ⁽²⁾		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

⁽¹⁾

Filed with the SEC on August 17, 2010, as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168911), which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

⁽²⁾

XBRL Information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

4244

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: ~~July~~November 2725, ~~2015~~2016

DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.

By /s/ ~~Sean~~Douglas ~~Tan~~Thomas

Name: ~~Sean~~Douglas ~~Tan~~Thomas

Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer, Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Sean Tan	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, Director	July 27, 2015
/s/ Douglas Thomas	Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, Director	November 25, 2016
Sean Tan
Douglas Thomas
/s/ Alexander Liang
Alexander Liang	Chairman, Director	July 27, 2015

Filing Compare · DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.